The URL can be used to link to this page

Admin Section 1 ADMINISTRATIVE SECTION Letter to Todd Gerhardt dated September 11, 1991. Letter to Bonnie Featherstone dated September 4, 1991. Letter to Gary Brown dated September 5, 1991. Letter to Bonnie Balach dated September 5, 1991. Memo to Moon Valley File dated September 3, 1991. ' Letter to Paul Terry dated September 6, 1991. Letter to Virginia Martelle dated September 9, 1991. ' News Release from St. Francis Regional Medical Center dated September 5, 1991. ' Letter to Steve Willette dated September 13, 1991. Letter to Evan Green dated September 13, 1991. Future City Council Agenda Items from the Engineering Department. Notice to Frontier Trail Property Owners dated September 10, 1991. Memo from Scott Harr dated August 26, 1991. ' Highway 5 Improvement Update from MnDOT dated September, 1991. TH 212 Improvement Update from MnDOT dated September, 1991. ' HRA Accounts Payable dated September 23, 1991. 1 1 -% IUnited Wam Street RECEIVED 404 South Minneapolis,Minnesota 55404-1084 S E P 1 (612)340-7400 3 T991 IFax 340-7675 CITY OF CHANHASSEN General Campaign Chair JarnesJ.Ranier,Ph.D. September 11, 1991 IGeneral Campaign Vice Chairs Karen 0.Bachman James R.Campbell William H.Ellis William F Farley 1991 Campaign Cabinet IChandlee M.Barksdale Todd Gerhardt Mary Ellen Barrett Paul Baszuc Baszuck City of Chanhassen William F Bieber Norman R.Carpenter 690 Coulter Drive William A.Cooper IDonaldPEarly Chanhassen, MN 55317 K.James Ehlen,M.D. Edward L.Finn Ron Lloyd yd P. Dear Todd:: L P.Johnson Cynthia Jurgensen IReatha Clark King,Ph.D David C.Lilly Thank you for your investment of time, effort and David C.Malmberg Y Y LindaL.Maxwell enthusiasm in conducting the 1991 United Way fund-raising Gregory J.Melsen Jackl.Mogelson campaign at the City of Chanhassen. IMichael J.O'Rourke Jeff D.Prouty Richard L.Raymond James R.Rickabaugh,Ph.D. You did a great job, helping to raise $104 . 00. Sally J.Rigler Kristian D.St.Martin Debra K.Sartt Your efforts a' Lynn rtJ.es Swenson kl,D.C. gained the support of your fellow employees, Robert J.Swenson and as a result, will help to provide local residents TobyG.Warson with more than 390 health and human care programs at 138 Jan Watson Raymond E.Wilkinson agencies located throughout Anoka, Carver, Dakota, ii Chair of the Board John E.Pearson Hennepin and Scott counties. Once again, thank you for President investing in people. James C.Colville 340-7585 Director,Resource Development It was a pleasure working with you and congratulations on William A.Schaeffler a successful campaign! 340-7663 1991 Campaign Office 1 340-7564 Sincerely, I %u-ivi._• 6s))\ Sue Wilder United Way Loaned Executive IMinnegasco /dp I I I QUned Way IINVEST IN PEOPLE 1.212. IT'S NEVER MEANT MORE I • CITY OF • i 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147• CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612)937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 September 4, 1991 ' Ms. Bonnie Featherstone I Metropolitan Council - Mears Park Centre 230 East 5th Street St. Paul, MN 55101-1634 Dear Bonnie: I just received a copy of the memorandum from Mary Anderson outlining the Council's upcoming program to update forecasts of population, households and employment. As you are aware, these forecasts have been a major bone of contention for many communities and have certainly been an issue for Chanhassen in the past. I have concerns with not only the process used to develop these ' forecasts, but also fundamental concern with the real world concept that these are not forecasts but have rather become imposed caps on a community's development. However, the point of this memo is to address some concerns I have with the forecasting methodology. Although Mike Munson has from time to time acknowledged that there are a series of community level forecasts that have been seriously ' flawed in the past, I find no evidence of an assessment as to why these errors occurred and what is being done with new methodology to ensure that these problems are minimized in the future. In my opinion, such a self appraisal would be a useful task to undertake before committing to a methodology that may result in similar errors being repeated into the future. .Y My second concern deals with what is termed the "Way and Sector Allocations". As noted in the memo the Council has defined 4 rings subdivided further into a series of sectors radiating out from the central cities. I am fundamentally concerned that the concentric ring theory of development in the Twin Cities no longer has the validity that it once may have held. The central cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul are in many cases no longer the dominant centers of commerce and population that they once were. For example, if one evaluates the employment and .population along the I-494 strip from the airport to Minnetonka, you would find that population and employment levels are quite similar to what is found in Minneapolis and probably in excess of what is found in St. Paul. O OY PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Ms. Bonnie Featherstone • ' September 4, 1991 Page 2 ' To my way of thinking, it makes some sense to take these sort of subregional concentrations into account when one attempts to develop models of where growth is going to occur in the future. ' Similar concentrations have begun to exist in other areas and probably have equal validity in terms of evaluation. I also believe that some of the sectors that are outlined in the ' memo are rather contrived. For example, Chanhassen is clustered in the western sector along with communities such as Watertown, Minnetrista and Hopkins. The City of Eden Prairie, which probably ' most parallels the development situation that is occurring today in Chanhassen, is located in the south Minneapolis sector. Similar dichotomies exist. For example, Burnsville, Eagan and Apple Valley in the 1980s had many similarities in terms of decisions that individuals and firms used when deciding to locate in those communities. However, they are located in two separate sectors. Ultimately, if Mr. Munson and his staff are able to use a better ' crystal ball than they have in the past, this may not prove to be a problem. However, I am concerned that the process that is outlined will result in the development of ring and sector ' allocations with the individual communities left to argue over their piece of the pie. Unfortunately, this sounds like the situation that we have had for the past ten years, which I do not believe has proven to be ideal. ' Upon further consideration and discussion, my concerns may well prove to be unwarranted and I acknowledge that my expertise in long ' range demographic forecasting is limited. However, having recently had to spend several years with Metro Council staff trying to make some sense out of what in our case was a flawed prior effort, I ' believe it is not only in Chanhassen's, but the region's best interest to ensure that the most reasonable methodology is utilized. ' I hope you find these comments to be of use. I would be happy to discuss them further with you at your convenience. Thank you again for your continuing efforts on our behalf. ' Sincerely, ' PaulKrauss, AICP Director of Planning PK:v 1 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL I Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, MN 55101-1634 612 291-6359 FAX 612 291-6550 TTY 612 291-0904 I August 23, 1991 • All Twin Cities Metropolitan Area • Local Government Units Dear Government Official: During the next year,the Metropolitan Council will revise its long-range forecasts for the region and for all local government units. The Council regularly prepares forecasts of population, households and employment as an important piece of its long-range planning process. The Council's current forecasts are an integral part of the Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework (MDIF) that was last revised in 1986. Those forecasts in the guide were based upon the 1980 census. The Council's forecasts are used to make important policy decisions about highways, sewer projects and other regional systems. The forecasts are used to review local government plan amendments and often have an impact on other decisions and work carried out by the Council. The revised Council forecasts will use 1990 census counts,more current land use data and an updated analysis of growth trends. Forecasts and sub-area allocations (including those for local government units)will be completed in 1992. Thereafter,the Council intends to revise its forecasts approximately every five years. The Council will also revise the MDIF over the next two years to reflect changes in the forecast as well as any new policy direction. REGIONAL FORECAST METHODOLOGY I The forecast project will consist of two major technical steps resulting in the following products: 1. Forecasts of region-wide population, households and employment through the year 2015. I Forecasts will be prepared for five-year time intervals for the years 1995,2000,2005,2010 and 2015. 2. Allocation of the regional forecast totals, first to rings and sectors (see maps), then to cities and townships and finally, to traffic analysis zones. Region-wide Forecasts The Metropolitan Council will base its region-wide forecast of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area population and employment on national estimates and projections made by the U.S.Census Bureau, the.Bureau of Economic Analysis and others. The Council will analyze projections and underlying assumptions to determine the most likely growth trend during the forecast period. The Council will determine Twin City Area population growth for 1990-2015 by extending the very stable,long-term ratio of Metro Area growth to total U.S.metropolitan area growth for the25 largest metropolitan areas. AUG 20 1:,, • 7 OF CH^.^:H SS I I Local Government Official Aug. 23, 1991 Page 2 ' The Council will convert the Metro Area population forecasts to households based on an analysis of the trends in household size within the Metropolitan Area and the nation and changes in age ' composition. The Council will forecast employment separately from population and households. Since the U.S. economy represents the dominant influence on the Twin Cities' economy, the basis of the forecasts ' will be national employment forecasts. Historically, changes in Metropolitan Area jobs closely track employment changes at the national level. ' Sub-area Allocations Ring and Sector Allocations ' Initially, the Council will analyze long-term growth trends and patterns by ring and sector and use discernable patterns to.allocate regional growth shares to the year 2015. The Council has defined ' four rings: the central cities,inner ring suburbs,developing ring and the outlying area. Sectors divide the region in roughly wedge shaped areas radiating outward from the central cities to the northeast, west, southeast, etc. (see attached maps). Growth in rings and sectors have followed consistent ' patterns over the last 30 years. Minor Civil Division Allocations ' The ring and sector allocations serve as control totals for households in each community. The allocation of households to communities within an overall ring and sector control total will be based on the community's past trends in numbers of households and housing units, remaining supply of ' developable land, location within the region, stage in the development cycle, travel accessibility and local development policies. Household forecasts by minor civil division will be converted to population based on the historical trend in household size in each individual community. ' Employment will be allocated using similar procedures to the household allocation,with emphasis on past trends, community travel accessibility and local policies. ' Traffic Analysis Zone Allocations Population, household and employment forecasts will be further allocated to traffic analysis zones with the assistance of each individual community. Traffic analysis zones are sub-areas within individual cities defined by highways or other physical barriers to auto travel. They are used by transportation planners and highway engineers to simulate current and future travel on roadway segments and interchanges. There are some 1,200 zones in the region. LOCAL GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE FORECAST PROCESS iWe anticipate substantial input by local governments to the forecast process over a six month period. The following briefly outlines the four stages to arrive at the local municipal forecasts and a tentative schedule for involving local government units in the process. I I 1 Local Government Official ' Aug. 23, 1991 Page 3 1. In Nov. 1991,the Council will hold a planners'forum to present,discuss and solicit comments on the overall regional control forecasts of population, households and employment for the period 1990-2015. At the forum,the Council staff will present historic regional growth trends, previous forecasts and the revised forecasts for the Metro Area. The next steps in the process leading to community and transportation analysis zone forecasts will also be described. 2. In Jan. 1992, the Council will hold a second planners'forum to present the sub-area(ring and sector) allocations of 1990-2015 forecasts for population,households and employment. Staff will present the ring and sector forecasts and discuss the assumptions underlying this allocation process. The process for review and comment on local forecasts will also be outlined. 3. In April 1992, the minor civil division (community) forecast allocations for the 1990-2015 ' period will be mailed to local governments for their review,comment and input. The mailing will include: the long-range forecasts of population, households and employment for the city; a description of the methodology and major assumptions; an indication of the type of data or information the community would need to present to bring about a change in the allocation; and the time schedule for submitting local comments on the forecasts. The Council forecast staff team will reserve substantial time over a 60-day period to work with representatives of individual cities. 4. In June 1992, the Council will mail to each community a package containing the 1990 Census based population,household and employment data for the community as a whole and for each traffic analysis zone within the community. In addition, each community will be sent the forecast allocation totals for population, households and employment for the 1990-2015 period resulting from the process outlined in number three (3) above. Each city will be requested to allocate these forecasts to the proper traffic analysis zone within their boundaries. The Council staff will assist the communities in allocating local forecasts to traffic analysis zones and review the zonal allocations for consistency with community forecast totals. In early Oct. 1991, the Council will send a notice specifying the date for the first planners'forum in Nov., which will initiate community involvement in the forecast process. We look forward to your participation in revising the region's long-range forecasts. S' rely, , dy8 aziotteit- Mary E. Knderson Chair MEAJkp 1 cc: Metropolitan Council Members 1 1 • GEOGRAPHIC RINGS OF THE TWIN CITIES METROPOLITAN AREA r-----s-pr- - - i( MIL IT PRA»CIS • I -- I rL. I I ,NIROOC Last luRNS ()AA 0110v1 ----..1 1 I I I ' -�'--�- SAMMt ANOKA CO. COWrfVS �„�/„.„7,,,,, AMOOT[f MAY 4R[ / I I IOitft LAKE I NEW SCINO• i la TomEsT LA.E ♦a»•[a LINO �- ran»t' I ; I IM COON RATIOS CENT RVlllt �� SLAIN( may *. NOGG MA»OIIIR 15215010`1 CISCI(PINES WASHINGTON—CO�— ' _OIEENIIELOI CO RCOSUN r•Kt VG ll IvOYN fMOftrltr 27 TARN t OCR/ORO /RIOItT TI Er 12 OAKS ,1 2 1Tlllw+T . ...NTT f[a! / I HENNE�N CO. EfoOKIT» NEr SRS , OR•Nr CENTER 11 RIGM OM• I IIGMTS /j / • I AgglAdii I IploinTO c(TST•L I 0u RDtal ss �� iiT:ar[■; aye' ( is Ilas IlLo+ 1 INOI►[NDL»Ct i/�j r[OINa rLTYOYTM MOI(1 30 S1 LITTLL-; 70' METROPOLITAN I rut[rulm C.. ` I ROSETUIt r 1 sr.lr.0 s COUNCIL • INNER RING L fa•rnrlr 1 GOLDIN r7 %I WOOS [1!X KOAI[ la[t - - - ' ORC laK I 1 I ' �_+ tLrO •NEf Ic-z GmAs AWL. Lamtl.NO .r[Rro.»I ;I °fond / r Z• CENTRAL CITIES ``��/ d //�/ / rINN SAINT PAUL 7 oar I 11 Ista i. /a� fr fora wOLLTwOCO w:rCRrOw.r l ”"`lti 2 •G/// 7 '�r.R[ �I rlrwta►oli� _ 12, Iin / j ►RI»ft. / 1 3T.tR0/i![ACM _ Ist✓'o»l•CNS /% 0OfiTl -1 �eol)wiT 72/ ——— tO1N• TAUS. ♦ITOM ! I r� rAT(f--- / _• •- tilt I•MTN III ■GLLrANY . �//// i 'smarm; 1 r Y»I,IfM VIA M(' •I/ / I wE1C MTS VII c=of1 1•t ib :+rULN I NAM,. �;y taKtfO hh [0[m'MCI ft EL ••CO»1• AR• I ILOONINGTem (EVES OSOTE , I CARVER CO. I aG•a MnGMTS CO1T*O1 OENM•a. I DEVELOPING RING 7e Iron»G ---- ----C1.A1»a DAKOTA CO. / - a�lc• DEVELOPING 1 o �- RORW000 I 43 I Il lac[xON SIOniviELE/ � / %i/ I COLoG»y OTNL0SEN l— fAVA6i 1 j ou.,;..cRlca I SENIOR 1 �, ( �/� ao P1103 ArK( M/M1NOtR •uRG I r- IOWSv4ls LANE 1 MASTIaGf I .. —�� I LO +a -- 7 e -�---- s...IRANusco I ie r J`�—�-- / -+NCOrR I I I I I v(KMILl10N IR•Y(MN I L-_- I 1.155111E �� SAND CRt[R I s/RING 1•K[ I CR(Otf CA NRt I ❑ MaR lM•N i I I RIV(R 41 /clot I T(TIOILL ON I ` SCOTT CO. 1 I I sr.vPR(NctI L I OUTLYING AREA 1 L, _._ PLAIN( i �.�. i��- I I I - I N(w M•Ratf I I Ds1ttr TRILR I I NA ea I T� 1 vat uaRun I K•Iwt I M(L2N• CIGAR LAKE I I CUSENI I 4filt ROC[ Res T w[ Intl I I w•wRTON I DOUGLAS u I I --I— I iaNOCt►M 6/ ' I I • MILES s Lo +j 20 2S l 051 55545.1 lwatIR 010 • i_- J TWIN CITIES METROPOLITAN AREA 1 Political Boundaries, 1988 1 MIRING PASS f swims 17 PULSES sinews 2f Gtr 1451 i 2 stews 10 iota II 20 It AN KA County Boundary 3 AN 11 SPRING LARS PASS IS 11 27 wNIT[5(a* •) A TOK[•IMP 12 Y.S.GOVT 20 GREY:LOUD 2f e1ONO S IJCtU10i a rILLTOP 21 1aMl ALL 20 T 111.51515 Municipal Boundary G GR([NS000 la COIYr nA MEI6NTS 22 SLLL 1000 30 Galt P515 MtIGMTt -a-O(. 7 1S ST .RTMONY 23 PIE[1P.ING1 31 LAKELAa0 SMITH ... O unucts[LASS 10 24 N 32 ST.••ST•S Remy e I L 1T FRANCIS S ORETME/ L1N WOOD I [AST'PETREL !URNS I OAK GROVE NORTH ----- I MINNEAPOLIS METROPOLITAN AREA SECTORS ANOKA CO. % (REVISED) COLUMBUS ,- I RAMSEY ANDOVER MAN LARS LAKE :/ I New SCANO• NORTH FOREST LANE I ST.PAUL , �1-4/— «: SAN *ASTON O NORTHEAST MARINE+ CMAM/LI■ COON RAPIDS CENT 'VILLE 11 ELAINE ST.PAUL MAY WISER NANOVLA NORTHWEST IEKINGTO, 'mg P111(1 WASHINGTON CO. • MINNEAPOLIS / 11 ouN INCSLVILW■ L —___ 0 ILLS COOCONAN I 2117 ITS VI(W MOITN PARR 1 I STILLwAT ER t I 12 OAKS Nlrt Rtu OC KFOAO AIOIET R[ HENNEPIN CO. RROOKUN NEW ' '''./../"7,24 GR•MT HMG ON Vi G«r ,� C fral, f' WATT ■ I❑lOALTTO QU ROES Q2! NEW 14 ILLS LI 1101114 PLYMOUTH OP !0 LITTL . METROPOLITAN / ILLS AMA 1t. .0 COUNCIL MULE PLAIN ,. D.rft:w= 11 H•PLEWNe LAKE 17 LlrO ONE LAK e E I WEST VAT AT I RAMSEY CO. VKEI•MO • ORONO I LABEL 0 or.t •TUTOWNI j % �� MINNETON■A ST LOUIS Y I MI IOTA i PARE SILENT PAUL %'W4/� �-T 4 wRNEILIOYS I NOLLYWOCO NAT OrOwIl - % //j OPNINS 4P ST C1011 SEAL I- ✓/ If 1! WEST 11000RUNT I/'ST --_— `—� oNl=acf us %� . .. 1DINA .�p� PAUL ' s''''})�� S CUTE SOUTHEAST N[� fIGM11[L0 •IR11. HEIGHTS -IAN IN AUL N(WP ET ST.PAUL ,j ICTORI CAMDEN •CONIA 1A LANETO.N LIEN/AA1f1E ST PAUL SOUTHWEST •LOONINGTN Al ��TwT�w� IMV(R GLOVE 1 �r111TNL.Ar OU$ 4OAR HEIGHTS COTTAO[ DtNMANN , 70YNG ff C«4fNA • DAKOTA CO. "� ■OfWNOi I I2 I 11ACIlfoH RrEMmlu • ST.PAUL. - ;-,/% j� COl06ML OA«LGREN I f4r4GE I j iii ,. YOUNG AMERICA DCNTON II I ' I PRIOR ( APPLE IOf/MNMT NIMINGER �. ( I r LOUISVILLE y■L 1 HAST MGS NAr1UAG – —�� A SAN FRANCISCO I SOUTH.' I «AN COPR I MINNEAPOLIS VERMILLION RA I yK[YILL[ I SAND CREEK I SPRING LAN[ I CREDIT IV RIVER ( EMPIRE ( M I • RIVER FARr1■ TOM t[SIO■ I II •BRIAN SCOTT CO. ( I ST LAWRENCE! I —I 1 1 L L.. y I PLAINS I I maw 14RKET I NA ON DAM TAIEf rIAKELEY I BELLE Kurt I HELENA CEDAR LANE I EUREKA I CASTLE ROCK I jt^Jr rl[3•Ill A[R HAMPTON I DOUGLAS I I I ■r• I I NO N. I I u A•NOOLP« 1 AN °LPN . -•• 4 I MILES S 10 lR 20 2S GREENVALE �WATERFOR O AM i 0 SOOT* I I TWIN CITIES METROPOLITAN AREA Political Boundaries, 1988 1 SPRING PARR 1 17 FALCON NUINTI IS OEM LAKE 2 I1 SONS' IS 2$RIHCNHOOD 4110114 I ■I KS SIRIRS LAKE PAIN 1!uUN6[ 27 WHITE OUR County Boundary 1 4 10114 RAT 12 II I.GOVT. 20 OUT CLOUD 21 OSOWO Municipal Boundary 1(ICILSIOR 13 HI 21 111 el►LLIRI( uE:P '7 4 GRELNWOee 14 COLUNIIA NMONTS 22 DELL 30 OAR PAIR laIOMTI �•��—Townshl Boundary 7 IS ST ANTHONY 23 nit NINNIES 21 LAKILANe Township ry I MEDICINE LAKE 15 IA MANYOMIDI 32 ST.MART'S Pe1NT 1 I CITYOF . 1 . J _:. . , . I " -` ,% �== ,.``_ 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147• CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 4 - 55317 (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 1 September 5, 1991 Certified Letter I 1 Mr. Gary Brown 1831 Koehnen Circle Excelsior, MN 55331 IDear Gary: Staff recently visited your mini-storage site to confirm that it is I in compliance with the conditional use permit issued to you on May 4 , 1987 . The conditional use permit was issued with several conditions (see attached) . A specific condition of approval was 1 that no outside storage is permitted. Upon inspection of your site, staff noticed outside storage of boats, U-Haul trailers, etc. The BF district allows outside storage as a conditional use permit. 1 If you wish to continue to have outside storage at your mini- storage site you must apply for a conditional use permit. You should be made aware that outside storage is required to be I screened and that screening would be a condition of approval. The renting of U-Haul trailers is a separate use from the mini-storage and is not permitted in the BF district. The BF district would I have to be amended to allow the renting of U-Haul trailers. The Planning Commission has been considering rezoning the BF district and may be opposed to adding new uses to the district. I Please contact me within 10 days of receiving this letter to let me know what action you would like to take. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact : e,_.: - . 1 Sincerely, I r #: Jo Ann Olsen L Senior Planner . 1 JO:v 1 pc: Paul Krauss, Planning Director Steve Nelson, Building Inspector Planning Commission City Council 1 .' 4, PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER I CITYOF vspi 1 .t„ i ,y- ii) cHANHAssEN ,.. :41/4,..:. , ._* , ,; it. „. . , , 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147• CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 I (612)937-1900e FAX (612) 937-5739 II September 5, 1991 II Ms. Bonnie Balach Mayor's Office II City of Saint Paul 365 City Hall St. Paul, MN 55102 1 Dear Ms. Balach: The simple answer to your question regarding clean up of polluted I sites is yes, we have had and continue to have problems with development of contaminated sites in the City. While I would hazard a guess that these have not been as significant as what II would be found in more highly developed areas, they have slowed the development process. - From our experience, however, I am not certain that additional 1 public subsidy is called for. I would be reluctant to see public funding take the place of efforts to seek recovery of damages from those who caused the problem. I What is of concern to us is the time that is involved in resolving problems when they do occur. It has been our experience that a protracted period of time is required to develop clean up plans, II undertake the program and ultimately get a clean bill of health from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. The existing law is not necessarily the problem. Rather it seems to be one of too I little staff, too little guidance and inadequate administrative procedures to handle the volume of problems that are being taken to the PCA. If additional public funding is to be appropriated, II perhaps it should be devoted to this area. Sinc rely, a-1-4-Xjg4-a-ete& /7 , , - - C II Paul Krauss, AICP I Director of Planning pc: ty Council Scott Harr, Public Safety Director II Charles Folch, City Engineer Todd Gerhardt, Asst. City Manager t 4, PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER I • I ` CITY OF SAINT PAUL c,.,00 `• OFFICE OF THE MAYOR uutnm �, :nntnu ;:1 �cc 347 CITY BALL JAMES SCHEIBEL SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 55102 MAYOR OR (612) 298-4323 August 12, 1991 I • RECEIVED IMr. Paul Krauss AUG 1 2 1991 Chanhassen City Planner City Hall _'H < LemrEVHASS R° IChanhassen, Minnesota 55317 IDear Mr. Krauss: Nearly every Minnesota city has contaminated sites within its boundaries that remain I undeveloped and polluted because of obstacles preventing local government action. Developers are reluctant to expose themselves to liability as it attaches to purchased land under Superfund laws. Clean-up costs often exceed the value of the land--a disincentive Ifor private sector intervention. Public sector subsidy is critical. The situation is urgent. Until these obstacles are removed, polluted sites will continue to I have a blighting influence on our communities and pose a potential health threat to our citizens. I I have brought this issue before both the League of Minnesota Cities and the Association of Minnesota Municipalities, but I am interested to know if there are problems with undeveloped polluted properties in your jurisdiction. My feeling is that this is a Istatewide problem; we can use this magnitude to our advantage. Please write or call me. Sincerely, I i� c-�'vr�l' ,1 A -(c• C A I Ms. Bonnie Balach Mayor's Office City of Saint Paul I 365 City Hall Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 (612) 298-4736 I I . I . Printed on Recycled Paper *.42%.,s CITY OF .- 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147• CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 * FAX (612) 937-5739 MEMORANDUM 1 TO: Moon Valley File FROM: Paul Krauss, Planning Director 1 DATE: September 3, 1991 SUBJ: Moon Valley 1 On Tuesday, August 27, 1991, I was contacted by John Voss, who is the consultant that has been retained by Moon Valley to prepare their permit application documents. Mr. Voss indicated that he would like to meet with me on the following day to discuss plans for Moon Valley that he had developed. He indicated to me that he was not making the full permit submittal but wanted to meet to show that progress had been made. 1 I replied that we were not looking for progress on a plan and that he had personally committed to submitting a complete set of permit application documents by the end of August and he was now indicating that he would be in violation of that agreement. I indicated that I would be in contact with the City Attorney and that we be taking whatever action we believed to be necessary under the circumstances. On Wednesday, August 28, 1991, the City Attorney and I met with Mr. Voss at City Hall. Mr. Voss showed us two completely different plans for the Moon Valley site. The first plan was one which we had reviewed previously. - In my opinion, was ludicrous since it showed making a crater out of the entire property, lowering much of it by as much as 160 feet. Mr. Voss indicated that this was the worse case scenario but that this was the plan which the owner. Tom Zwiers, was permitting him to make for the application. Mr. Voss then revealed an "alternative" plan which he believed was consistent with the outlines of a plan which he described to the City Attorney and myself over one month ago. This plan would save portions of the bluff line with the site being graded ultimately for development into 21 acre lots. I first reviewed the "alternative" plan and made several comments on it. I indicated what I had indicated in the past to Mr. Voss, that it is not within our power to grant 21 acre lots in this area, since this is in violation of Metropolitan Council standards, the Comprehensive Plan Is�• a 11 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER ' Moon Valley File September 3, 1991 Page 2 ' and the Lake Ann Agreement with the Metropolitan Council. At best, we would have to maintain a 1 unit per 10 acre gross density. I also noted that a fairly considerable amount of grading remains and ' that much work would have to be done to refine this plan for it to be acceptable. The City Attorney and I confronted Mr. Voss on his applicant's strategy. In essence, they are submitting a completely inappropriate plan and essentially indicating that the city can earn their alternative plan by being good to Mr. Zwiers. I indicated that it would be my intent to review one plan and if they choose to submit the plan showing the 160 foot cut as the primary document, that in fact is the one that would be reviewed. We ' further indicated that we would not be party to this type of gamesmanship and believed it to be inappropriate. Mr. Voss indicated that he was only in a position to submit the first plan and the alternative. ' pc: City Council Planning Commission Roger Knutson, City Attorney 1 1 I idri/41 5-ec. . 9/23/ 'KI"wOOD Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District O q Engineering Advisor:Barr Engineering Co. 7803 Glenroy Road Minneapolis,MN 55435 . ` d 830-0555 , ``'--L Legal Advisor:Popham,Haik,Schnobrich&Kaufman 3300 Piper Jaffrey Tower Minneapolis,MN 55402 333-4800 • September 6, 1991 ' Mr. Paul Terry 400 Deerfoot Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Mr. Terry: Thank you for the copy of your letter of August 22, 1991, to the Chanhassen City Engineer. It is my understanding that the erosion is caused by surface water drainage after rainfall events . The water comes from undeveloped agricultural property. We have asked the Engineer for the Watershed District to determine whether the resulting problems affect any of the District 's public waters including Lake Riley. If that is the case, the Managers will look at what corrective action may be required of the landowner. Presently, the District does not regulate agricultural land use. If the property were to be developed, the District would impose requirements to insure that adequate detention basins 1 and erosion control facilities are in place. If you will provide more detailed information concerning the location of the property and its present owner, the Watershed District will work with the City of Chanhassen to propose solutions that you and your neighbor can consider. Your question as to who is responsible for the problem , starts with the property owner and the party damaged or impacted by that owner's action. This is a private matter between the two parties and would be governed by the applicable water law principles. The Board of Managers have long been interested in the control of non-point source pollution, particularly run-off from non-urban, agricultural lands. The District had a cooperative project with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the United States Environmental Protection Agency along with the Cities of Chanhassen and Eden Prairie which would have resulted in regulations to control problems of this type. Unfortunately, 1 Mr. Paul Terry September 6, 1991 Page 2 because of undue focus on a very minor aspect of the project, a t public access to a lake, the funds were withdrawn by the MPCA/EPA and the project did not proceed. Thank you for your inquiry and if you have any further questions, please contact the undersigned or our attorney Raymond A. Haik. ' Very truly yours, ' Conrad Fiskness Chairman ' cc: Don Chmiel Paul Nuemann Bob Obermeyer ' 134/98 1 /4, .ce--4-- , , 9 /z3�9 � 1 CITY OF ...„ , 114 ... cc AA al f- -4,-1 , y,:P:-..:-,... _.„--_---:::,, . CHANHASSEN .,,,s, ,,,,.,. ..,,,,,, 1 'X; ., t� ;„- 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 7”-- (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 I �wa September 9, 1991 I Virginia Martelle, Principal ' St . Hubert ' s Elementary School 306 West 78th Street Chanhassen, MN 5531? I Dear Ms . Martelle, WELCOME BACK TO SCHOOL! I I would like to take this opport-unity to welcome you, faculty and students back for what is sure to ,be a great school year ! I would I like to take this opportunity to offer the services of Chanhassen Public Safety to you and your school . We will be happy to provide any services you may need, including presentations to classes, extra I traffic patrol around your schools , or anything you may think would be helpful . One particular training opporstunity that I would like to recommend is I to have one of our officers come in to;• chat a bit with your school crossing guards to emphasise the importance of their role, and to add pointers that may be helpful . Our experience is that as a year wears I on, crossing guards tend to become a little more relaxed--and it is a very important role they play. Again, here ' s lo -a. great year ! I look forward to talking with you. II ,Y ., . . : 7_7_ -M777---mil_` ",_- .y => Sincere1 Scott Harr ` '`' - ,:a--;; 5,; . II Public Safety Director SH:bk . cc: Dr. Dave Clough, Superintendent *Letters were also sent to: I Principal Duane Udstuen, Minntonka Intermediate School Principal Kathleen Macy, Chanhassen Elementary School I tof PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER I ICC... tec,c/r - /4 I 0 • . St,Francis IREGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER IFor Immediate Release c ' September 5, 1991 Contact: Theresa Johnson, Director of Marketing& Public Relations,496-7585 I St. Francis Studies • dies S><te For New Shakopee Medical Campus I (41) St.Francis Regional Medical Center continues to work towards its goal of developing a new Medical Campus to be located in Shakopee along County Road 17. U I co St.Francis has.petitioned the Shakopee City Council for city water and sanitary service to meet the needs of their proposed new campus. The petition was considered at the City Council's September 3, 1991 meeting and it was decided that the Council staff would review the utility service needs with the Metro- ' politan Council and following these discussions would entertain the request again during the next 2-4 weeks. If the petition is approved,it will be several months before the City Commission will be filing the city's comprehensive land use plan with the Metropolitan Planning Commission,including the new St. I Francis Medical Campus. This is just one of the first steps being taken to secure a potential site for the new medical campus. Other preliminary efforts taken during the month of August involved soil and rnenvironmental hazard testing on the proposed site to determine suitability for a major complex. IThe preliminary plan for the St.Francis Medical Campus,which was originally announced in February, 1990,calls for the construction of a new 70-bed hospital in phase one which includes a Diagnostic and Treatment area conveniently located for outpatients and in close proximity to a Medical Office Complex. I The new location and structure would have the potential for expansion of other health related services and buildings on the campus to meet the projected growth of the area. Don Leiv tm " I e ann,CEO of St.Francis Regional Medical Center,said, "We are moving incrementally towards our vision of a new Medical Campus which will be designed specifically to accommodate the dramatically changing ratios of inpatient and outpatient care. The addition of a new Medical Office I Complex to the campus will allow us to meet the growing need for medical office space to properly support our current medical staff and the increasing number of medical specialists coming to St.Francis." St.Francis is the only hospital in the Twin Cities seven county area that does not have a Medical Office Building on its campus or the room to build such a facility. I Leivermann added, "Our primary goal at St.Francis is to provide the best medical services available to the communities we serve. We feel that the new St.Francis Medical Campus will strategically position us for the future and enhance our ability to do that. The location of the new Medical Campus is the key SEP 09 1991 325 \\est Fifth A\enue, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379(612)445-2322 I4 hrmanre 4cnon Employer A member of the Benedictine Health System. 'ITV OF CHANHASSE 1 I I to the proposed expansion. Our service area projections indicate a 14%growth rate over the next five I years. This growth in population will mean inherent amounts of increased noise and congestion associ- ated with traffic,parking and emergency transports by ambulance and occasionally by helicopter. Our I current landlocked facility is in the center of a residential neighborhood. A new Medical Campus located on the outskirts of the city would greatly benefit the citizens of Shakopee and the surrounding communi- ties we serve." St.Francis Regional Medical Center is a non-profit hospital,owned and sponsored by the Benedictine ' P Po y Health System of Duluth. St.Francis was recognized among the top 3%of all hospitals nationally by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations in 1990. The existing medical center is I licensed for 126 beds and employs 432 people in addition to 224 physicians representing 30 different specialities and is Shakopee's second largest employer. St.Francis serves the communities of Shakopee, Chaska, Chanhassen,Savage,Prior Lake,Jordan,Eden Prairie,Belle Plaine,Carver and the balance of I the Southwestern corridor of the State of Minnesota. St.Francis received over 3,911 inpatient and 33,035 outpatient and emergency visits in fiscal year 1991. <30> I I I I I I I t CITY OF i ' 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147• CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 . FAX(612) 937-5739 ' September 13, 1991 Mr. Steve Willette Lakeshore Equipment 7851 Park Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Steve: The following letter is a result of a site visit to Lakeshore Equipment that occurred on Wednesday, September 11, 1991, between ' yourself, members of the City Council and City Staff. This meeting grew out of the City Council's action at a recent meeting to continue discussion on your request to amend your conditional use permit to allow for a visit and discussion of optional alternatives. Growing out of this meeting, the following conditions were ' generally agreed to by those present. 1. Picket fence sections along the south and east walls of the storage yard should be removed. The existing picket fence sections along the west yard entrance and along the north exposure adjacent to Lakeshore Equipment would be allowed to remain. The transition between the picket fence section along ' the west side and the proposed area along the south where the pickets shall be removed shall be acceptably faired. 2. All horizontal boards shall be realigned so that they are fully horizontal and in line with one another. The area receiving the most concern was the southeast corner of the site where boards run at different angles from the balance of the fence. We must also ask that you consider removing the southeast corner gate since there is no apparent purpose for this and it is visually obtrusive. 1 3. All materials stored inside the yard area shall be subject to the original 8 foot height limitation. The exception shall ' dock canopy supports which would be allowed to extend over this height when they are attached to assembled dock sections. The outdoor material storage rack located near the building 1 .t 47 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER I 1 Mr. Steve Willette 1 September 13, 1991 Page 2 must be reduced in height and made to conform to your original conditional use permit approval. 4. Exterior landscaping is generally acceptable on the west and 1 south elevations. East elevations and the southeast corner area should be infilled to replace dead material and to provide ample screening. 5. Remove the piles of wood that is dumped outside of your fence line. 1 As I indicated, these are conditions that were generally agreed to by those who were present but it is not official Council policy until it is acted upon. There was a further request that you remove several sections of the picket fence near the south and southeastern exposures so that the City Council can review the site to ensure that the approach outlined above is the correct one. I am therefore going to pull the Lakeshore item from consideration at the September 23rd meeting and will schedule it for the October 14th meeting. In the interim, I would ask that you remove those sections of fence as soon as possible so that I may notify the City Council and they can visit the site. Thank you for your assistance in this matters 1 Sincerely, Pa-01- / Paul Krauss, AICP Director of Planning PK:fi pc: City Council Planning Commission Don Ashworth, City Manager Sharmin Al-Jaff, Planner I • 1 1 i I CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147• CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-19000 FAX (612) 937-5739 September 13, 1991 ' Mr. Evan Green MnDOT District 5 2055 No. Lilac Drive Golden Valley, MN 55422 Dear Evan: ' I am writing you relative to the future design of the Hwy. 212/101 interchange. I have held discussions with the property owner and ' had an opportunity to look at the alignment of the interchange located north of Hwy. 212. I became somewhat concerned that the proposed alignment does not allow for a free flow of traffic between Hwy. 101 intersection and Lake Susan Drive. Lake Susan Drive is the main street serving a large residential subdivision. I believe that it would be most appropriate for this street to have a direct through an adjoining parcel out to the proposed intersection. I would appreciate your looking into this matter as soon as time permits and would be happy to sit down and discuss this with you further. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, 1 ' Paul Krauss, AICP Director of Planning PK:v pc: Jim Lasher, LSA Design Al Klingelhutz ' Charles Folch , City Council 1 i ti sir PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 3 , • 9/17/91 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FUTURE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS ENGINEERING September 23 , 1991 1 - Accept Utility Improvements in Trappers Pass 4th Addition - Project No. 90-6 1 - Approve Cooperative Construction Agreement for Trunk Highway 5 Frontage Road Improvements at Lone Cedar Lane - Project No. 90-9 - Award of Bids for Trunk Highway 5 Frontage Road Improvements at Lone Cedar Lane - Project No. 90-9 1 October 14, 1991 Establish Fee Schedule for In-House Engineering Services - Receive Feasibility Study for Watermain and Sanitary Sewer Improvements in Section 24 and Lake Riley Hills; Call Public Hearing - Project No. 90-10 - Adopt Assessment Roll for Frontier Trail Improvement Project 1 No. 89-10 (continued from 9/9/91) - Adopt Assessment Roll for Lake Drive East Improvement Project i No. 89-6 (continued from 8/26/91) - Authorize Revision of Sanitary Sewer Connection Charges I October 21, 1991 - Approve Plans and Specifications for Minnewashta Parkway Upgrade; Authorize Advertising for Bids - Project No. 90-15 November 4 . 1991 - Public Hearing on Watermain and Sanitary Sewer Improvements in I Section 24 and Lake Riley Hills; Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications - Project No. 90-10 November 18, 1991 - Award of Bids for Minnewashta Parkway Upgrade - Project No. 90-15 I I ' FUTURE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS ENGINEERING PAGE 2 Future Agenda Items - Accept Utilities in Lake Susan Hills West 6th Addition - Project No. 91-7 ' - Accept Street and Utility Improvements in Reed's Orchard Ridge - Project No. 88-24 - Receive Pavement Management Needs Report • ' - Approve Engineering Services Contract with Barton-Aschman Approve Amended Development Contract for Market Square Storm Sewer - Consider Feasibility Study for Extension of Dell Road from Lake Drive East South to Eden Prairie City Limits - Project ' No. 90-7 (Joint with Eden Prairie) - Approve Plans and Specifications for County Road 17 Upgrade South of Trunk Highway 5; Authorize Advertising for Bids - Project No. 90-4 - Award of Bids; County Road 17 Upgrade South of Trunk Highway ' 5 - Project No. 90-4 - Approve Plans and Specifications for North Leg Trunk Highway ' 101; Authorize Advertising for Bids - Project No. 88-22B (1/92) - Award of Bids; North Leg Trunk Highway 101 - Project No. 88- 22B (4/27/92) - Revision of County State Aid Highway (CSAH) System and ' Transfer of County Highway Jurisdiction - Ordinance Allowing for Restricted Weight Permits During Spring ' Road Restrictions - Establish a Fee for Lot Releases CONSULTANTS PLEASE NOTE: Reports are due in Engineering no later g 9 than 10 days prior to the City Council meeting date, i.e. Friday Copies to: City Hall Department Heads City Council Admin. Packet Consultants • I CITYOF CHANHASSEN e: 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147• CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 September 10, 1991 Re: Notice of Workshop Frontier Trail Improvement Project No. 89-10 Dear Resident: ' You have been previously notified of the public hearing on the assessment roll for the Frontier Trail improvement project. From discussions at the September 9, 1991 City Council meeting, it was decided to hold an informal workshop to allow affected parcel owners the opportunity to discuss any outstanding issues or concerns related to the project or assessment roll . This 1 workshop has been set for Thursday, September 26, 1991 at 7: 00 p.m. in the City Council chambers . The project consultant engineer, Mr . Bill Engelhardt, will be present at the meeting to discuss any relevant questions or concerns that you may have. If you cannot attend this meeting and wish to discuss any issues, please feel free to contact me at 937-1900 or Mr. Engelhardt at 448-8838 and we would be happy to answer any questions. Sincerely, CITY OF CHANHASSEN e.**#°‘ 1 Charles D. Folch, P.E. City Engineer CDF:ktm c: Bill Engelhardt, Engelhardt & Associates Don Ashworth, City Manager City Council Administrative Packet (9/23/91 ) • 1 1 1 -- CITY OF 1 CHANHASSEN )11111' 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Don Chmiel 1 City Council Don Ashworth, City Manager FROM: Scott Harr , Public Safety Director ? 1 DATE: August 26 , 1991 SUBJ: Proposed Noise Ordinance 1 Please recall that after a discussion during the administrative presentation portion of a recent council meeting, the City Council did direct me to develop a draft noise ordinance. I have done this , and it was discussed at the August Public Safety Commission meeting. ' A number of concerns arose, including those that have been expressed in the past . These included concerns on legitimate recreational ' vehicles , home remodeling & repair , etc. I brought the idea of a noise ordinance to the Council to inquire ' whether there was interest in it . Because of concerns that continue to be raised, I am recommending at this point that I table further efforts to develop a noise ordinance, and document problems over the next year to determine what areas of need we have. If a noise 1 ordinance is pursued, we will then have an exact idea of what problems need to be addressed, and can draft the ordinance in the least restrictive manner, If anyone has a disagreement with this , I would ask that they contact me. I would like to thank everyone for their input on this . Ilt 1 1 1 Z«! PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 1 . .1 TRUNK HIGHWAY 5 IMPROVEMENTS 1 H IN CHANHASSEN & EDEN PRAIRIE AREA 1 I . 1 I 1 1 -.-----\1-- ---" \----...\..,.‘, ,,f,_ ,........,_c_ r . O. 1-\\ 4F-7, -7..-"--.'-•-.. ...._________. `\4�0t.` • !+rte ` -�+s" /t.-7n-t'.. - _` - F ``-t'•"_� r" 0 =r te"__ _/' Ha .� itAS 0 / --- - _ -••� ___-_,.:;;;;:.-n--:,_ ,:`.• `7h /' - ( ; ::�.. 1 ,•..- Sir ••; dJ �A ;-__ '� I / _ ..)i• �. \ j i ter= _= ,. 1 .....: r- '�'? � r �a-`+r ,y'� ,r�- •mss`- % 'i.,-•�'. ��, /.. •• • II I -- - ..-''' - -.- w --::- ...---z-..- '/,.4",',. -1',-• 1; t• ikiti, ` s= ue. 3 Y= -::i'J,11.iv/. ' I! ' I �,.,'_ '. rail lfril.� .t' I fif i- iI 1 1 JiI It - - -y.. ..._ocit[r(p _ ,.< , 1 1 11 11'1 '11i''J l..! • 4 1 DISTRICT . MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1 Golden Valley Office . 1 • . SEPTEMBER 1991 I 1 t i _ /� oo uoos 1 ill 1 /o•auup/ z '09 a•• 1a a•ac•:2.T / I .. 101 ' 1� Intent*NitilYNNM9>,ma oa u7rroa a ao{ •NOtaYSOaNr a;msr•r a>un:Na SaaatarV a00oxr7 ssra Ni 02414140,NoraYNYOa.tr 13I6Y -Z ^__\ • • 71YIYYY ..707�� 21 A S . votho.p/V•a•]s A]un07 aol spu•]s 'N•V'S'7 `�/ : n O / \. • cm sa•Ilop)o suolllls ui • $1ib4 O •a'JV•ua u ti N V S J :•0a. - •/.•a+�al •.•p i pulp 1. Nua ussn;aa u0!]>na]su0.11 -_ • ; ].1-+c:1 t T IS N'al root d s : _ !� (soils 0 [) t{{i Alnf • 14V•T J uldauu•N � (fr.' ��/ �� H ,\1 I )�000 tr o] ti N V S a a•N•7.oat buld•aspur7 11 Ilk _ 1•i •a a1 t o Is 'N'a) is-coot d s a[ I I N I 31� _6 1661 at. 'V f, lit / lac0 a.o p•]•l:s] D•oJll•Y w+t oos ilb cola...;:_-. aa]s s•Na•oadG• S 01001 1 41.10 n •av0 t 0 IS •N 1) Ls-c001 • S at ) , YOl1 ']ap > WC% la.idcaa (stir S 1) 4/ 101 ID paisal:s7 .1 A10003 uldauu•N n Dus tl mot/2021.0a 'N'V's 7 a.na.3 u•a..asa uolaanaisuo260 r` 111].pull , • IS 'N al tS-coos d•S [ .. ... \ /. J 1 1661 ml]•ldaaa pla Issue s 11 —1T p•;•ol::l 'N'V T'7 uldwu•N Pt..uil Aaunoa I .i u iuld•uua. N ua•nl.a uot]>na]suouos ' Aa • l 1 { (sslla N S'Y I [ I11 'N 1) St- l0tc d'T i .� fl • "', � 7 SR1Y1f TfOS NOlad IY7L30 lS] 19Y A 11 • V I' 1.1 z �s Q A r Y a .wt` Q �'< n Co ,h I N z s D —1 JI ■_ _ NoY V woos..Ipt V Z: 13 .,C, 1 ..►• mil �`• ' � �\ Nil IIIII /� - ��9 101 1 1 2,L�� a1YIYW N303 /' 1•a. i ova !! � w iC� z �� CD paw n . - gloPirek- -.(-- , .I , 1 a.2"-' rsit) :11111.460% ,_____411,-__,5 . I, 1 , e#;-,4 -wk*7 ,, ,_ '_.. *of .\ ,,,,lob, * 0 Alp - (n \ ). .fip, ,I i r_,___, \ . 1 , r ', 111.,- ' 0 0 ! ..__ ‘.___...,...,„ .11% mit ''s ��wAaY ,�� L—�r ��L 1 rn[oiwl •1✓ • 't.N 1 C. Id,,N �� ` ® 1 ' imil- - i V-�J • • i�1 L. K ‘Ni l l — J ♦ � ' _ it _ �I,-' CHANHASSEN H.R.A. A C C O U N T S P A Y A B L E 09-23-91 PAGE 1 CHECK # A M O U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P O S E 044451 2,230.00 CARVER COUNTY TREASURER OTHER ACQUISITION COSTS 044452 1,664.00 CARVER COUNTY TREASURER OTHER ACQUISITION COSTS 044453 317.00 CARVER COUNTY TREASURER OTHER ACQUISITION COSTS 044454 4,653.00 CARVER COUNTY TREASURER OTHER ACQUISITION COSTS AND-SPL ASSESSMENT PAYMENTS 044455 4,911.00 CARVER COUNTY TREASURER OTHER ACQUISITION COSTS 044456 2,223.00 CARVER COUNTY TREASURER SPL ASSESSMENT PAYMENTS 044457 459,137.45 CITY OF CHANHASSEN SPL ASSESSMENT PAYMENTS 044458 1,663.10 HOISINGTON GROUP, INC. FEES, SERVICE 044459 2,718.59 STRGAR-ROSCOE-FAUSCH INC FEES, SERVICE • 9 479,517.14 CHECKS WRITTEN • I LunDGREn BROS. CONSTRUCTION September 10, 1991 I INC Don Chmiel 1 Mayor City of Chanhassen 7100 Tecumseh Lane Chanhassen, MN 55317 II935 E.Wayzata Blvd. Dear Mayor Chmiel: Wayzata Thank you for considering our PUD proposal on September 9, 1991 for I Minnesota55391 the Ortenblad/Ersbo property on Lake Lucy Road in Chanhassen. Unfortunately because of the numerous items on the Council agenda, (612)473-1231 the meeting ran later than usual and the City Council tabled taking ' action on our proposal until the next Council meetong on September 23, 1991. At the meeting it appeared that each Council member had questions that they would like to have answers to. Please allow me the opportunity to meet with you so I may address your concerns. ' I will call you this week to try and set a time that is convenient for you. Thank you. Very truly yours, LUNDGREN BROS. CONSTRUCTION, INC. ' orbord Vice President TMF:bw 1 1 1 I