The URL can be used to link to this page

5. South Hwy 101 Project I 5 C I TY OF I -- 1 CHANHASSEN 1-" 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 II (612) 937-1900 • FAX(612) 937-5739 IMEMORANDUM TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager IFROM: Charles Folch, City Engineer IDATE: September 4, 1991 SUBJ: Award of Bids for South Leg Trunk Highway 101 Project No. 90-20 I On Tuesday, August 13, 1991, bids were received and opened for the II South Leg Trunk Highway 101 Realignment Project No. 90-20. The confirmed low bidder is Wm. Mueller & Sons, Inc. at a total contract bid of $402,540.85. This bid was approximately 18% higher I than the revised engineer's estimate. The primary reason for the low bid exceeding the engineer's estimate is due to the cost of the granular borrow which came in at approximately double the estimated cost. It is apparent that the borrow source for this material is I some distance away. In addition, the uncertainties with the fall weather conditions may have also affected the overall bid prices. II As a part of the bid proposal, each bidder was asked to submit an alternate pricing for the postponing of the wearcourse paving until 1992. The alternate bid price from Wm. Mueller & Sons, Inc. for this work if delayed until 1992 will add $4,000 to the total Icontract. As I had mentioned previously in a previous staff report, this road I improvement will function as a temporary road segment of the future new Trunk Highway 101. The two primary benefits for construction of this temporary road segment are the redesignation of Trunk II Highway 101, via Dakota Avenue, Trunk Highway 5 and Market Boulevard south of Trunk Highway 5 out of the downtown area. This, incidentally, is the only route for Trunk Highway 101 which MnDOT would consider for redesignation. More importantly, however, is I the fact that the Trunk Highway 212/Trunk Highway 101 improvement project may not be completed for 10 years or so and delay the redesignation accordingly. Therefore, the City has made a 1 commitment to MnDOT, Carver County and Hennepin County to do this temporary connection thus allowing for the Trunk Highway 101 to be redesignated by MnDOT and relieve some of the traffic burden now IIbeing carried through the downtown roadway system. Pt II %srr PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER I Don Ashworth, City Manager September 4, 1991 Page 2 The majority of the necessary agency permits have been applied for and granted with the exception of MnDOT, Carver County and the DNR. These three remaining agency permits are expected to be received within a week or so. The present construction time schedule calls for a project start-up of September 16, 1991 and a completion by ' December 6, 1991. Any delay in permit approval may impact the project schedule. It is therefore recommended that the City Council award the South Leg Trunk Highway 101 Realignment Improvement Project No. 90-20 to Wm. Mueller & Sons, Inc. at a contract amount of $402,540.85 with an alternate price of $4,000 for paving the wearcourse in 1992, contingent upon receiving the remaining outstanding agency permits (MnDOT, Carver County, DNR) by September 20, 1991. ktm Attachment: 1. Letter of recommendation from project engineer dated August 20, 1991. 2 . Staff report dated June 19, 1991. ' c: Dave Hempel, Sr. Engineering Technician Jon Horn, BRW Gary Ehret, BRW I 1 I I I I Fcb 9v-2 I 1 BRW II August 20, 1991 :.-•r:- 1)°7 irI T•9 �: . T,; %au;..t.'� •�, I I j'.l�In.� .11,. Z sRw INC. Mr. Charles Folch s.i rA w:' w ,:F�c. � h= City Engineer w itul;:: _ + ';L .a City of Chanhassen II 690 Coulter Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: Contract Award II TH 101 Realignment - South Leg CP 90-20 I Planning Dear Mr. Folch: Transportation I Engineering On Tuesday, August 13, 1991, bids were received and opened for the Urban Design above-referenced project. The bids which were received are as follows: II Thresher Square 700 Third Street So Schedule Minneapolis. Modification II MN Bidder Amount Add/(Deduct) 612/370-0700 Fax 612370-1378 1. William Mueller & Sons, Inc. $402,540.85 $4,000.00 I 2. Valley Paving, Inc. $411,499.30 $2,600.00 Minneapolis 3. Hardrives, Inc. $419,862.60 $ 850.00 Phoenix 4. Shafer Contracting Company, Inc. $420,255.61 $1,000.00 Denver 5. Northwest Asphalt, Inc. $430,374.15 $4,000.00 II St.Petersburg 6. Alexander Construction, Inc. $437,184.33 $2,000.00 San Diego 7. Alber Construction $444,428.20 $2,500.00 II Seattle Engineer's Estimate $340,000.00 Donald W Ringrose Richard P Wolsfeld All bids were submitted with proper bid guarantees in the amount of II Peter E.Jarvis ten percent (10%) of the total bid price as required by the project ThomasECarroll specifications. A tabulation was performed to verify the bid Craig A.Amundsen amounts, and an error was found in the bid of Hardrives, Inc. ; II Donald E.Hunt however, the error was small and did not affect the bid order. A JohnB McNamara bid tabulation summary sheet is attached for your information. Richard D Pilgrim ee Dale N.Beckmann Jeffrey L Benson • Ralph C Blum II Gary J.Erickson John C.Lynch Paul N.Bat 11 I . . rMr. Charles Folch August 20, 1991 Page 2 The low bidder is William Mueller and Sons, Inc. , with a total bid price of $402,540.85. The William Mueller and Sons bid is approximately $62,540.00 above our Engineer's Estimate, a difference of approximately eighteen percent (18%). Although the low bid is substantially greater than the Engineer's Estimate, the bids appear fairly competitive within a range of approximately ten percent (10%) of each other. As a part of the bid, each bidder was required to submit alternate ' pricing for the delay of the wear course paving until 1992. Bid alternate pricing for this modification in the project schedule ranged from an addition in the total contract amount of $850.00 to I $4,000.00. The alternate bid price for William Mueller and Sons, Inc. , was a total contract addition of $4,000.00. ' We have reviewed the bids to determine the reason they exceeded the Engineer's Estimate. Based on our review, it appears that approximately $40,000.00 of the overrun is a result of bid prices ' for granular borrow which are significantly higher than anticipated. Our estimated unit price for the granular borrow was $4.00/cubic yard based on pricing received for the recently constructed TH 101/Lake Drive project. Granular borrow pricing received for this project ranged from $5.50 to $9.54/cubic yard with a median price of $8.55/ton. It is also possible that the short schedule and late ' season construction may have affected bid prices. William Mueller and Sons have been involved in some recent projects in the City of Chanhassen; however, they have not recently been a part of any projects with BRW. It is our understanding that they have performed satisfactorily and should be capable of performing the work required by this project. We, therefore, recommend award of the TH 101 Realignment - South Leg Project, CP 90-20, to William Mueller and Sons, Inc., for the low bid price of $402,540.85. William Mueller and Sons propose to use the following subcontractors to perform the work required by the project: William Mueller and Sons - Bituminous Paving Busse Construction - Underground and Grading A & B Electric - Electrical ' Triple A Striping - Striping I I Mr. Charles Folch r August 20, 1991 Page 3 i Subject to City Council approval, we anticipate commencing , construction by September 16, 1991. All work required by the project will be completed by December 6, 1991. It should be noted that this project has required several agency approvals including: o Mn/DOT 1 o Carver County o Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District o Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) o Army Corps of Engineers o City of Chanhassen (Wetland Alteration Permit) I We have obtained Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District, Corps of Engineers and City of Chanhassen approvals. It is anticipated that we will receive DNR approval within the next week. We are currently working with Mn/DOT and Carver County to obtain their approval prior to the scheduled construction start date. Any delay in permit approvals may impact the project schedule. Please call if you have any questions or we can provide any additional information. Sincerely, BRW, INC. on : . Horn, PE Project Engineer ' JBH/srb Attachment cc: File 7-9001 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 s 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 - TRW FILE: 7-9001 BID TAP SUMMARY SHEET CITY OF CHANHASSEN CITY OF CHANHASSEN TH 101 REALIGNMENT (SOUTH LEG) CITY PROJECT NO. 90-20 BID H CONTRACTOR A - ROADWAY P - ELECTRICAL GRAND TOTAL 1 WM. MUELLER $ SONS INC. 397,278.23 5.262.62 402,540.85 VALLEY PAVING INC. 401,822.05 9.677.25 411,499.30 HARDRIVES INC. 410,390.10 9,472.50 419,862.60 4 SHAFER CONTRACTING CO., INC. 411,889.45 8,366.16 420,255.61 5 NORTHWEST ASPHALT. INC. 424,959.40 5,414.75 430.374.15 6 ALEXANDER CONSTRUCTION, INC. 427,774.73 9.409.60 437,184.33 7 ALPER CONSTRUCTION 434.979.20 9.449.00 444,428.20 • HRW FILE: '-9007 8/14/97 1 HIP A - Ri)AI)WAY ITEM NO./ CONTRACT WM. MUELLER & SONS IN -VALLEI' PAVING^INC. HARDRIVES INC. ' MINT UNIT 9UANTITYIMIf_PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 1 SALVAGE TYPE C SIGN EA 5.00 2`+.00 125.00 40.00 200.00 55.00 275.00 2104.523 2 MOBILIZATION LS 1.00 15.000.00 15,000.00 12,500.00 12,500.00 13,000.00 13,000.00 2021.501 • 3 CLEARING ACRE 2.50 2,000.00 5,000.00 2,500.00 6,250.00 2.200.00 5,500.00 , 2101.501 4 GRUBBING ACRE 2.50 1.000.00 2,500.00 1,500.00 3.750.00 1,100.00 2,750.00 2101.506 5 REMOVE GUARDRAIL - . LF 165.00 3.00 495.00 5.00 825.00 4.00 660.00 2104.501 PLATE BEAM 6 REMOVE C.M. PIPE LF 64.00 5.00 320.00 7.00 448.00 5.50 352.00 - 2104.501 7 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & LF 10.00 4.00 40.00 10.00 100.00 5.00 50.00 2104.501 GUTTER 8 REMOVE BITUMINOUS SY 3.330.00 2.00 6.660.00 1.70 5,661.00 2.00 6.660.00 2104.505 PAVEMENT • 9 REMOVE ANCHORAGE ASSEMBLY EA 2.00 150.00 300.00 210.00 420.00 100.00 200.00 2104.509 10 SALVAGE 48" DIAMETER LF 10.50 20.00 210.00 21.00 220.50 22.00 231.00 2104.521 MANHOLE 11 SALVAGE PERMANENT EA 7.00 55.00 385.00 75.00 525.00 60.00 420.00 , 2104.521 BARRICADE 12 SALVAGE CASTING EA 2.00 50.00 100.00 125.00 250.00 55.00 110.00 2104.523 - 13 COMMON`EXCAVATION CY 22,300.00 1.81 40,363.00 1.76 39.248.00 1.85 41,255.00 2105.501 14 MUCK EXCAVATION CY 2,000.00 1.97 3,940.00 1.92 3,840.00 2.00 4,000.00 2105.505 15 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION CY 4,850.00 1.81 8,778.50 1.74 8,439.00 1.85 8.972.50 2105.507 16 SUBORADE PREPARATION RD.STA 18.40 100.00 1,840.00 135.00 2,484.00 110.00 2,024.00 2112.501 17 GRANULAR BORROW (CV) CY 9,100.00 8.52 77.532.00 8.77 79.807.00 9.50 86,450.00 2105.521 18 RELOCATE RILEY CREEK LS 1.00 1,300.00 1,300.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 105.601 r - MB NM MI • MO • MI M • MO • MI • - r - MI 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 BRW F1LE: 7-9001 8/14/91 BID A - ROADWAY ITEM NO./ CONTRACT WM. MUELLER & SONS IN VALLEY,FAVINS INC. HARDRIVES INC. mNppTNo. ITEM ___ _.- UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE Amotimr UNIT PP10E AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 19 WATER r000 8 20.00 1n.00 300.00 18.00 360.00 20.00 400.00 2130.501 20 AGGREGATE BASE PLACED. CY 5.250.00 12.80 67.200.00 13.18 69.195.00 13.00 68,250.00 2211.503 CLASS 5 (100% CRUSHED . LIMESTONE) 21 TYPE 41A WEARING COURSE TON 1.300.00 21.25 27,625.00 20.98 27,274.00 22.95 29,835.00 2331.508 MIXTURE 22 TYPE 31B BASE COURSE TON 1,900.00 20.25 38,475.00 18.74 35,606.00 20.20 38.380.00 2331.514 MIXTURE 23 IRREGULAR WIDTH PAVING SY 425.00 12.00 5,100.00 10.97 4,662.25 5.50 2.337.50 2331.521 (MEDIAN) 24 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR GAL 615.00 1.00 615.00 1.30 799.50 1.00 615.00 2357.502 TACK COAT 25 BITUMINOUS CURB LF 590.00 4.50 2.655.00 2.97 1,752.30 3.00 1.770.00 2535.501 26 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LF 440.00 13.50 5,940.00 10.70 4,708.00 10.50 4.620.00 2531.501 DESIGN 8624 27 CONCRETE MEDIAN $Y 90.00 26.00 2,340.00 21.00 1.890.00 24.00 2.160.00 2531.503 28 CONCRETE MEDIAN NOSE EA 1.00 % 300.00 300.00 500.00 500.00 385.00 385.00 531.602 29 RIPRAP, CLASS II CY 25.00 25.00 625.00 30.00 750.00 27.50 687.50 . 2511.501 30 RIPRAP. CLASS III CY 20.00 28.00 560.00 32.00 640.00 31.00 620.00 2511.501 31 GEOTEXTILE FILTER, SY 80.00 2.00 160.00 2.50 200.00 2.20 176.00 2511.515 TYPE IV 32 12" CS PIPE CULVERT LF 54.00 10.00 540.00 10.70 577.80 11.00 594.00 2501.511 33 12" CS PIPE APRON EA 2.00 65.00 130.00 75.00 150.00 71.00 142.00 2501.515 34 6" PERF. PVC PIPE DRAIN LF 940.00 8.00 7,520.00 8.45 7,943.00 9.00 8,460.00 2502.541 (SDR 35) . 35 33" RC APRON WITH EA 2.00 1,160.00 2,320.00 1,220.00 2,440.00 1,300.00 2,600.00 2501.515 TRASH GUARD 36 33" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN LF 202.00 54.45 10,998.90 57.25 11,564.50 60.00 12,120.00 2503.541 3006 CL III HRW FILE: 7-9001 8/14/91 I HID A - ROADWAY ITEM NO./ CONTRACT WM. MUELLER & SONS IN VALLEI' PAVING INC. HARDRIVES INC. MNDOT NO. ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 37 CONNECT TO EXISTING FA 1.00 250.00 250.00 275.00 275.00 275.00 275.00 503.602 STORM SEWER 3B CONSTRUCT MANHOLE LF 20.50 170.00 2.665.00 145.00 2.972.50 143.00 2,931.50 2506.501 DESIGN 48-4020 39 INSTALL SALVAGED MANHOLE LF 4.00 65.00 260.00 75.00 300.00 71.00 284.00 506.603 40 INSTALL SALVAGED CASTING EA 2.00 65.00 130.00 350.00 700.00 71.00 142.00 506.602 41 12" DIP. CL 52 LF 90.00 28.00 2,520.00 28.85 2,596.50 31.00 2,790.00 504.603 42 CONNECT TO EXISTING EA 1.00 250.00 250.00 300.00 300.00 275.00 275.00 504.602 WATER MAIN 43 FURNISH AND INSTALL SIGN SF 203.50 20.85 4,242.98 21.90 4,456.65 23:00 4,680.50 2564.531 PANEL, TYPE C 44 DETOUR SIGNING LS 1.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 2,850.00 2,850.00 2,800.00 2,800.00 563.601 (PART 1) 45 DETOUR SIGNING LS 1.00 7.,500.00 7,500.00 4.500.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 4.500.00 563.601 (PART 2) 46 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1.00 1 ,000.00 13,000.00 16,200.00 16.200.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 563.601 47 INSTALL SALVAGED SIGN EA 3.00 125.00 375.00 135.00 405.00 140.00 420.00 563.603 PANEL, TYPE C 48 4" SOLID LINE WHITE - LF 3,910.00 0.16 625.60 0.23 899.30 0.20 782.00 564.603 PAINT 49 4" SOLID LINE YELLOW - LF 1,240.00 0.16 198.40 0.23 285.20 0.20 248.00 564.603 PAINT 50 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE LF 2,005.00 0.32 641.60 0.44 882.20 0.40 802.00 564.603 YELLOW - PAINT 51 24" SOLID LINE LF 20.00 1.10 22.00 0.55 11.00 1.30 26.00 564.603 WHITE - PAINT . . 52 24° SOLID LINE LF 640.00 1.10 . 704.00 0.55 352.00 1.30 832.00 564.603 YELLOW - PAINT 53 4" BROKEN LINE LF 90.00 0.16 14.40 0.23 20.70 0.20 18.00 564.603 WHITE - PAINT 54 PAINT BITUMINOUS CURB LF 580.00 0.25 145.00 0.28 162.40 0.30 174.00 564.603 YELLOW - PAINT On MI MS MI MI MI IIIII MI OM IIIIIII MO NM 111. 11111 111111 IIIII 111111 MB all 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 r 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 BPW FILE: 7-9001 8/14/91 BID A - ROADWAY ITEM NO./ CONTRACT WM. MUELLER & SONS IN VALLE!' PAVING INC. HARDRIVES INC. MNDOT NO. /TEM UNIT QUANT;IT'Y UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 55 PAVEMENT MESSAGE EA 2.00 20.00 40.00 35.00 70.00 22.00 44.00 564.602 TYPE 1. LT. TURN 56 TRAFFIC BARRIER - DESIGN LF 453.00 12.95 5.866.35 13.25 6,002.25 14.20 6,432.60 2554.501 B 8307 57 TWISTED END TREATMENT EA 2.00 495.00 990.00 525.00 1,050.00 550.00 1,100.00 - 2554.523 58 SEED. MIXTURE 700 LA 90.00 2.00 180.00 10.00 900.00 9.00 810.00 2575.502 (50 LB./ACRE) 59 SOD, APPROVED TYPE SY 3,800.00 2.00 7.600.00 1.78 6,764.00 1.80 6.840.00 2575.505 60 MULCH MATERIAL. TYPE 5 TON 1.35 900.00 1,215.00 700.00 945.00 660.00 891.00 2575.511 (1500 LB./ACRE) 61 POLYPROPYLENE PLASTIC SY 2,950.00 0.15 442.50 0.85 2,507.50 0.77 2.2271.50 2575.521 NETTING 62 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER TON 0.18 600.00 108.00 625.00 112.50 650.00 117.00 2575.531 ANALYSIS 10-10-10 (200 LB./ACRE) f 63 EROSION CONTROL LF 150.00 1.75 262.50 1.90 285.00 2.00 300.00 575.603 TYPE I 64 EROSION CONTROL LF 1,250.00 2.75 3,437.50 2.83 3,537.50 3.25 4,062.50 575.603 TYPE III • 65 DITCH CHECK EMBANKMENTS LS 3.00 600.00 1,800.00 1,000.00 3.000.00 660.00 1,980.00 . SUBTOTALS: 397,278.23 401,822.05 410,390.10 BID A - ROADWAY ITEM NO./ CONTRACT SHAFER CONTRACTING CO NORTHWEST ASPHALT, IN ALEXANDER CONSTRUCTIO MNDOT NO. ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 1 SALVAGE TYPE C SIGN EA 5.00 150.00 750.00 55.00 275.00 56.00 280.00 2104.523 . 2 MOBILIZATION LS 1.00 27,000.00 27,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 2021.501 3 CLEARING ACRE 2.50 3,000.00 7,500.00 2.100.00 5,250.00 2,240.00 5.600.00 2101.501 4 GRUBBING ACRE 2.50 3.000.00 7,500.00 1.000.00 2,500.00 1.120.00 2.800.00 2101.506 - . PRW FILE: 7-9001 8/14/91 i DID A - ROADWAY ITEM NO./ CON-MAI-1 SHAFER CONIRAC11N6 CO NUR1HWES1 ASPHALT, IN ALEXANDER CONSTRUCTIO mND0T_NP 'gm_ . OMIT OUAN11TY UM( PRICE AMOUNT UN11 PRICE AMOUNT UMW Pk10E AMOUNT 5 REMOVE GUARDRAIL - 1'T 165.00 2.00 330.00 4.00 660.00 3.00 495.00 2104.501 PLA1E DEMI 6 REMOVE C.M. PIPE LF 64.00 10.00 640.00 6.00 384.00 5.60 358.40 2104.501 7 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB 8, LF 10.00 5.00 50.00 10.00 100.00 5.00 50.00 2104.501 GUTTER 8 REMOVE BITUMINOUS SY 3,330.00 2.00 6,660.00 2.90 9,657.00 1.50 4,995.00 2104.505 PAVEMENT 9 REMOVE ANCHORAGE ASSEMBLY EA 2.00 250.00 500.00 200.00 400.00 150.00 300.00 2104.509 10 SALVAGE 48" DIAMETER LF 10.50 50.00 525.00 25.00 262.50 22.40 235.20 2104.521 MANHOLE 11 SALVAGE PERMANENT EA 7.00 200.00 1,400.00 75.00 525.00 61.60 431.20 2104.521 BARRICADE 12 SALVAGE CASTING EA 2.00 150.00 300.00 50.00 100.00 56.00 112.00 2104.523 13 COMMON EXCAVATION CY 22,300.00 2.45 54,635.00 1.70 37,910.00 1.84 41,032.00 2105.501 14 MUCK EXCAVATION CY 2.000.00 '. 2.45 4,900.00 1.85 3,700.00 2.02 4,040.00 2105.505 15 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION CY 4,850.00 2.45 11,882.50 1.70 8,245.00 1.84 8,924.00 2105.507 16 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RD.STA 18.40 150.00 2,760.00 110.00 2,024.00 150.00 2,760.00 2112.501 17 GRANULAR BORROW (CV) CY 9,100.00 5.50 50,050.00 8.75 79,625.00 9.54 86,814.00 2105.521 18 RELOCATE RILEY CREEK LS 1.00 2,500.00 2.500.00 1.350.00 1,350.00 1,456.00 1,456.00 105.601 19 WATER 1000 G 20.00 20.00 400.00 30.00 600.00 20.00 400.00 2130.501 . 20 AGGREGATE BASE PLACED, CY 5,250.00 13.40 70,350.00 14.30 75,075.00 14.70 77,175.00 2211.503 CLASS 5 (100% CRUSHED . LIMESTONE) 21 TYPE 41A WEARING COURSE TON 1,300.00 22.95 29,835.00 24.60 31,980.00 23.50 30.550.00 2331.508 MIXTURE 22 TYPE 31B BASE COURSE TON 1,900.00 20.20 38,380.00 22.00 41,800.00 20.30 38.570.00 2331.514 MIXTURE - • NM • MI • MI MI MN - 11111 • MI MI MN MN I•11 MI .11 1 I °I• -i o0 00 00 00 00 00 ° N °m .4o m o0 00 00 om N° o 1 U21 0 u.JI r:+Ci ..V o n n 0 rm F7 0 0 N IT O• v Q• +•+ Q m t1 0 N nP. 0 c• m• 0 .4 in m i r .; N CO N N N .•■ Z 1 .•1 t 0 W! Ct UI ^1`%i c o 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 ¢ �i o 0 o r. 0 8 r� a N m a o 8 8 o m m :.F-I N .1 r%1 ..I •0 0 CO .1 N .+ N 0 0 .+ 0 r. N N W Hi .. N in N n .• N 0 •o CO U in N C 01 ! .r I I i I Z FI 0 O O O O O O O O O O Q 0 O O 0 0 0 I f O O O O 0 0 O 0 O O O 0 It 0 0 2 0 U) N +C% O 0 0 O• O O O 0 .+, •0 •3 m O N J E! Q Q, Q •0 d F9 N •0 .+ .I N Q F7 N N N m aa1 2 I n N Q .4 N N .+ N I m o l Ct-, i I WI r L1 Hi iiJ iti 0 O O O O O 0 O O O O C O O O O O O 3 Xi T in o VJ O O O O O O N O O O O O 0 2 FV N .1 N O 0 O O O N O O 0 O •0 O r Cl Hi - .+ M r, ., N 0 t .o r� ' I - c ZI n N N .+ o Z n s ~ 1 1 1 I Cl t 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o U�i N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o • !'• 11: O O O O O O O O O O O O O O c Z C; g :-i Ef ! •0 N is NN 0 inn N C co .�1 C O 0 Y ..4 Q N i-a! J i N .-a t•9 N .•a H .r 0• af. m Q I 1 1 Z WI 0 L U Hi CO 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 it Xi f 0 O O O O O o O O O O O O O O O O ill I I 4.I-I 0 .1 n CO O 0 0 0 • af. T ii M 0 VJ V) • N n m c Q O N .4 .. c`o� N 1 I I i->i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O (.J 1-1 0 C Y. O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r: O i c • • c r-i if. in O O O •■ v O O Cr N 0 N N ..1 O Q N • Ti R ' 0. Q 0• N N 0 u; 0' 0 N Cl a1 N ' C I- > • 11. 4. >• C T. ) Y- 4. C LL C IL. C LL Li. a ii 0) O J J m W U U m J W J W J W J J W Di o I 0 Cl CC H H J 1 o Z W W a m Zx F ? .J F N F- A 0 CR Q Q 0. H (Cl Z H 8C W Z W Z a' H W E U it H H W > 0 A. II N 0 W 0 i 2 W .x 2 2 H H F- J aY H H E- H tC a a J Cl i1 A. 3 W H S O (Cl (Cl Cl a Cl H H m m H U a m X Z N a a I H E U CC A A m m LL U Z W CO 3 > 3 C W W a a W W 3 O A W H E Q J J UJ N U N E E J ..J W A. a. Cl. at cc 0.H O W I •C a I Y. Cl)- 0 .0 U U J H H 0.0 HH 1-3 1-m M m i C' OC 0 WO W W H a LL C0 a w UQ JT 1 Z F- F i- .. F> 4.N 7C HU H W Z W W O. LL X H N N aY F7 m UU s.-co CCZ J J O i L^H E E CC C7 it it a a W U U W aC Z S I-m C C C E. it1 O 7 Y Cl U H U U CC CL f-W Ca.0: N •0 (04-4 I- F 0 3 W! :C�_+ I-U I- Z N 3 1 A. S O 0. z L. Cl . a s 0.4(3 3 U1 ca 1 N C HI HE Ha H O W Cl 0 H H W>- N CV ' m tr10C Mo 01- OW Z Z aL i- Cl 0 A U U CC S 01- .t .a '0'- mi.- M r•9 um 00 H H i 0: N. Wm 4 •OI .± 0 8 0 M .4 ..1 Ifs .i .4 .e af. .1 .1 J T 1 O ZI N 0 O 0 0 CJ O 0 .+ .1 .y Q .+ Q N 0 47 N H\ Z I N cif, C') •O lr N1• m0 TOO Oafs 41 N1f. MO CO Cali •0N NO MO 0.O 00 U.Q U), N • CV CV • N • N • CV.0 N • 49 • F9 • F9 • F9 • F7 • M • t•7 F9.0 t0 F9.0 Q V) E O, -I N u i .4 .1 .+ .y .-I 4 .i .4 N 0 0 •0 3\ Cl. W AI ti of M F'1 F'1 .. .1 .i .1 it Cv H F Z3 t., F'1 0 o Y. M o I in in 0 0 0 0 tqq9 0 o o 0 Cl H E, CV N N N v N CV N N N N N N ✓. N 1O f. 0 • • I • i I I 0 0 Ti 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I -I Fi C o N o O o 0 CO N CO •0 N N Cr m•'r 2. L.0. N 0 4t 0 0 0 0 Ti Ti 4 Q N 40 N Q m CO 0 Oi 0 m N 0 0 0 N O N N N m .+ NO Cr Y .4 m ii ri 03 Cd N m 0 0 Q N N N N F CI `' O i ~ I O I iJ Wi X UI rT 0 O O 0 m m •0 f•7 Ti CO CO 0 0 0 0 Z ul Ti 0 F7 0 0 0 0 .t .4 to C4 N .'t N Cr 0 Cr 0 X FI .+ O Ti 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .4 ••t 0 0 N ti• V 0• I J Z Ti co C'4 0 0 O .Qi N ¢ N C Q M 0 0 it o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r, o o I +t 1-, O 0 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 O N 0 r � • I C 0 CO O O O n C4 CO C4 fn •o m c o n o N _Iv .a CJ T •0 C•. O . S• i Q Wi I i F Ui U H; In Y, 0 'O 0 In O ill XI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 3 i>� 0 0 0 0 O 0 O N N Q .+ e4 N F7 0 M 0 N Fi 0• O 0• 0 0 0 Y. 0 0 0 .i •• O O if M II m II a Ni N •0 .+ 0 0 0 Y N .t N OX N `0 C�' 0 0 Z Di I 'N e 1 I ! C.1 I ó 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 Fi a o r 0 0 0 0 0 0 o in 0 0 M z:i O 0 t•7 0 0 0 0 N 0 NI 0 0 N p 0 40 0 0 zOI 0 o N 0 0 0 4 N 0 •+ N N .Qi 0 m 0' N 44 .E, N if+ C: Y £15 O Q 0• Ti 0 1.7 L C; .; di I i Z Wi 0 U! Xi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i at 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N In 0 di N N 0 0• 0 0 W H 0 O .t 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .C4 0 m IT �I I•• 0 C, 0 0 0 .�•+ Q L7 Mi N N O .t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • FY)-1 0 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q • ' ' n O O O O N I N 0 • XI. 0' ,� Ti .• .•i .+ Ti M .O•i 0 0 N Q 0• 0 Z Qi E 0• N O •0 r C N I O 0 .t I M Ca 01 I I Fi c . m m m Q w W w w w LL W Q W Q A rf, W J J J W J J J J J J J W J W J , ZI 0. 2 O 1 M M m m Ii1 J h U q E I--t M J J q = W m W 2 I Q O F J W 3 Y 04F W WF W OF Qm W .z n i< X H H F 3U 1 W J2 2F 22 ZF 22 mF- M F W." j 2 OM M2 MM M2 MM m X X J W A W 2 2 2 J W M M m Q J M J Q J M E Q W • tQY A DX U 02 XS O t7 CS J J S Q S Q OS E F C 2 FU I F. Q Y N N U NY W AS A 24. F J W M a F A A J 1 M M I All M I F S F E S .+ C•.I U J M M A J 1 J Y I 1:4 2 . U A •E • M J J J 03 O 03 O 3 W.+ Mn W Aj 0 0 U 4-4J =j F- MF li QJ OF OF OO mW m0 X10 FO E b.0 F •J &)- Q El q 2 W 2 W 0 C 0 C Li. F W m2 m2 AJ I- J MI- 2J WW Wt•7 m 0 3 Wi - 21- 0:2 I-C HC C m2 M M J cm s J H HJ >S CM M WO N C 4Fi! .4 U 3 1.0. As, A� F 12'40. Q0. Qa. Q N (43 i4)- Q3 6 i` 0.)- FF--AG 3 N•' 1 41 \�: .a F7 N 0• CM M N Ti .t •+ .t M 1.7 FY 1. Ti Ti Ti' M Ti N 0 N 0 II .+O NO F7if. '0 in0 •0O n0 m0 0,0 00 •+O NO 1.70 'O 00 ill/ nt4S 0445 i 1,..%. Q rI v -0 C•0 Q • q-0 Q•0 Q•0 V ,0 V-.0 0 'O 10,0 145.0 a5.0 it'..0 Y..0 if+.0 115 in N re: cr Q Q ifi 3\ 0 W 0 O O •0 Ti Ti Ti Ti Q Q Q v Q Q Q 0' n g N C •0 •0 in •0 NO `0 •0 ••0 i0 NO `0 •0 (4 ifs r i a:w -EI 0 0 N Y. ' '0 '0 '0 i0 *4 t0 '0i NO '0 m N N N 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 1 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 . _ BRW FILE'S 7-9001 8/14/91 t . BID A - ROADWAY ITEM NO./ CONTRACT SHAFER CONTRACTING CO NORTHWEST ASPHALT, IN ALEXANDER CONSTRUCTIO MNDOT NO. ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 59 SOD, APPROVED TYPE SY 3,800.00 1.65 6,270.00 1.70 6,460.00 1.05 7,030.00 2575.505 • 60 MULCH MATERIAL, TYPE 5 TON 1.35 600.00 810.00 620.00 837.00 672.00 907.20 2575.511 (1500 LB./ACRE) .. 61 POLYPROPYLENE PLASTIC SY 2,950.00 0.70 2,065.00 0.75 2,212.50 0.78 2,301.00 2575.521 NETTING 62 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER TON 0.18 595.00 107.10 620.00 111.60 670.00 120.60 2575.531 ANALYSIS 10-10-10 (200 LB./ACRE) 63 EROSION CONTROL LF 150.00 3.00 450.00 2.50 375.00 1.96 294.00 575.603 TYPE I . 64 EROSION CONTROL LF 1,250.00 4.00 5,000.00 4.30 5,375.00 3.0S 3,850.00 575.603 TYPE III 65 DITCH CHECK EMBANKMENTS LS 3.00 500.00 . 1,500.00 650.00 1,950.00 672.00 2,016.00 ' SUBTOTALS: 411,889.45 424,959.40 427,774.73 r BID A - ROADWAY ITEM NO./ CONTRACT %ALDER CONSTRUCTION MNDOT NO. ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 1 SALVAGE TYPE C SIGN EA 5.00 55.00 275.00 - - . . 2104.523 2 MOBILIZATION LS 1.00 7,500.00 7,500.00 • 2021.501 3 CLEARING ACRE 2.50 2,200.00 5,500.00 2101.501 4 GRUBBING ACRE 2.50 1,100.00 2,750.00 2101.506 5 REMOVE GUARDRAIL - LF 165.00 5.00 825.00 2104.501 PLATE BEAM • 6 REMOVE C.M. PIPE LF 64.00 5.50 352.00 , . 2104.501 7 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & LF 10.00 3.00 30.00 2104.501 GUTTER 8 REMOVE BITUMINOUS SY 3,330.00 2.50 8,325.00 2104.505 PAVEMENT BRW FILE: 7-9001 8/14/91 DID A - ROADWAY ITEM NO./ CONTRACT ALDER CONS1RUCl/ON MNDOT NO. ITEM UNIT OUANTITY UNlf PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 9 REMOVE ANCHORAGE ASSEMBLY EA 2.00 150.00 :100.00 2104.509 10 SALVAGE 48" DIAMETER LF 10.50 22.00 231.00 2104.521 MANHOLE 11 SALVAGE PERMANENT EA 7.00 60.00 420.00 2104.521 BARRICADE 12 SALVAGE CASTING EA 2.00 55.00 110.00 2104.523 13 COMMON EXCAVATION CY 22,300.00 1.80 40,140.00 2105.501 . 14 MUCK EXCAVATION CY 2.000.00 2.00 4,000.00 2105.505 15 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION CY 4.850.00 1.80 8.730.00 2105.507 16 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RD.STA 18.40 110.00 2,024.00 2112.501 . 17 GRANULAR BORROW (CV) CY 9,100.00 9.30 84,630.00 2105.521 18 RELOCATE RILEY CREEK LS 1.00 '1.500.00 1,500.00 105.601 19 WATER 1000 0 20.00 20.00 400.00 2130.501 20 AGGREGATE BASE PLACED, CY 5,250.00. 16.00 84,000.00 2211.503 CLASS 5 (100% CRUSHED LIMESTONE) 21 TYPE 41A WEARING COURSE TON 1,300.00 26.00 33.800.00 ‘ 2331.508 MIXTURE 22 TYPE 31B BASE COURSE TON 1,900.00 22.25 42,275.00 . 2331.514 MIXTURE 23 IRREGULAR WIDTH PAVING SY 425.00 16.00 6.800.00 * 2331.521 (MEDIAN) 24 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR GAL 615.00 1.25 768.75 2357.502 TACK COAT 25 BITUMINOUS CURB LF 590.00 4.00 2,360.00 2535.501 26 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LF 440.00 10.50. 4,620.00 2531.501 DESIGN 8624 MI MI In IIIII MI IIIIII NM - IIIIIII ME MI Ma NM MI MI IIIIII OM MI al 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 . . • RRW FILE: 7-9001 8/14/91 DID A - POADWA1 ITEM NO./ CONTRACT ALNEk LoNsTROCTION HIT __OUANFITY UNPJ:KICE _ AMOUNt________UWLYFOCE____OMOVNr_______UNIT_FEaCE____AMOONT_ 27 CONCRETE MEDIAN Si 9o.00 23.00 2,070.00 2531.503 28 CONCRETE MEDIAN NOSE FA 1.00 400.00 400.00 531.602 - 29 RIPRAP. CLASS II CY 25.00 28.00 700.00 2511.501 30 RIPRAP. CLASS III CY 20.00 30.00 600.00 2511.501 31 GEOTEXTILE FILTER. SY 80.00 2.50 200.00 2511.515 TYPE IV -, 12" CS PIPE CULVERT LF 54.00 11.00 594.00 ,_ 2501.511 33 12" CS PIPE APRON EA 2.00 72.00 144.00 2501.515 34 6" PERF. PVC PIPE DRAIN LF 940.00 9.00 8,460.00 • 2502.541 (SDR 35) 35 33" RC APRON WITH EA 2.00 1.300.00 2,600.00 2501.515 TRASH GUARD 36 33" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN LF 202.00 .. 60.00 12.120.00 2503.541 3006 CL III 37 CONNECT TO EXISTING EA 1.00 275.00 275.00 0 • 503.602 STORM SEWER 38 CONSTRUCT MANHOLE LF 20.50 145.00 2,972.50 - 2506.501 DESIGN 48-4020 39 INSTALL SALVAGED MANHOLE LF 4.00 150.00 600.00 506.603 40 INSTALL SALVAGED CASTING EA 2.00 72.00 144.00 506.602 41 12" DIP. CL 52 LF 90.00 30.00 2,700.00 504.603 • - 42 CONNECT TO EXISTING EA 1.00 275.00 275.00 504.602 WATER MAIN 43 FURNISH AND INSTALL SIGN SF 203.50 20.00 4,070.00 2564.531 PANEL. TYPE C 44 DETOUR SIGNING LS 1.00 3.500.00 3.500.00 563.601 (PART 1) DRW TT 1E 7-0001 8/14//1 RJD A -- k( (DWAi TlEM NO./ COLOR:AC; ALWA CONSTRUCTION 111400I.NO, 11411 UNIT WANT311 UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UN11 PRICE AMOUNI UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 45 PETOUI- SIGNING CS 1.00 4.500.00 4.1100.00 563.601 (PART 2) 46 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1.00 15.000.00 15.000.00 563.601 47 INSTALL SALVAGED SIGN EA 3.00 55.00 165.00 563.603 PANEL. TYPE C 48 4" SOLID LINE WHITE - LF 3.910.00 0.18 703.80 564.603 PAINT 49 4" SOLID LINE YELLOW - LF 1,240.00 0.18 223.20 564.603 PAINT 50 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE LF 2,005.00 0.35 701.75 564.603 YELLOW - PAINT 51 24" SOLID LINE LF 20.00 1.20 24.00 564.603 WHITE - PAINT 52 24" SOLID LINE LF 640.00 1.20 768.00 564.603 YELLOW - PAINT 53 4" BROKEN LINE LF 90.00 0.18 16.20 564.603 WHITE - PAINT 54 PAINT BITUMINOUS CURB LF 580.00 0.30 174.00 564.603 YELLOW - PAINT 55 PAVEMENT MESSAGE EA 2.00 25.00 50.00 564.602 TYPE 1. LT. TURN 56 TRAFFIC BARRIER - DESIGN LF 453.00 16.50 7.474.50 2554.501 B 8307 57 TWISTED END TREATMENT EA 2.00 500.00 1,000.00 2554.523 58 SEED, MIXTURE 700 LB 90.00 14.00 1,260.00 2575.502 (50 LB./ACRE) 59 SOD. APPROVED TYPE SY 3.800.00 2.00 7,600.00 2575.505 60 MULCH MATERIAL, TYPE 5 TbN 1.35 900.00 1,215.00 2575.511 (1500 LB./ACRE) ' 61 POLYPROPYLENE PLASTIC SY 2,950.00 1.10 3,245.00 2575.521 NETTING 62 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER TON 0.18 450.00 81.00 2575.531 ANALYSIS 10-10-10 (200 LB./ACRE) MI MB IIIII MI 111111 MI MU OM MS I I . 1 i--! I Z 1 CI 1 LIP IL Hi ■:-. wl I-I I 2: I 1 I . 1 ZI &t: s-1 CI 1 I . 1 1,111 -,i HI 21 I-I wi -,1 ! i I I I 0 I-I 0 2' • N N 0 0 0 0 C‘i Os g E• .i I-1 V 0, Os I- •:.,.1 •• . w I r.1 wi V 111 0 ' X I t- I 01 WI cr 0 Hi 0 2i 0 ill 0 2 I • M i.* _12.1 C.7..1 i CA 0 n 4:1 . .• 0 1-1 0 C HI * 0 0 0 0 I 5 0i Li a i I I . .4 I-I Li. Li. t N HI LI -I -I Z: I 0 I N I- Z W E Y , 2 I -.1 0 X H -I 2 I- C r w z z le o CJ •• L.) LI Lii LO 9, c s z 0- 6:11 u . . ' E MW COW 0 W pw ow r a o r isi ,• I, e k wi- wi- A us :-.. .. w ■ .i I I ....... . . DPW F 1L F 7 ,0.■1 . I OH, i4 -. IPI( (A ITEM NO., t.1 IN I PIA 1 WM. Milli-F. & SORT. HI v.J.I E.,' TOJJNO INT . HAI,DR1VEL INt . mmorNo- rIrm _ __ _ . . MIT_ WIINIIIT . . _ UNI1 fki' E... AMM11.4r _ _ _UNIJ !I IT I, . _AMOUNT .... _PI413 .1.TOCL_ _AMININY 1 COHHLt i TO EXISTING ES 1.00 110.00 110.00 350.00 3".0.00 310.00 310.00 565.001 F1-1 l, POINT 2 LIGHTING UNIT -- TYPE R1 EA 1.00 1,995.00 1,995.00 2.500.00 2,500.00 2.400.00 2,400.00 2545.511 COMPLETE - • 3 2" RIGID STEEL CONDUIT LF 80.00 11.00 880.00 10.20 816.00 10.50 840.00 2545.521 (JACKED) • 4 2" RIGID STEEL CONDUIT LF 54.00 5.28 285.12 9.75 526.50 10.00 540.00 2545.521 5 #6 - 3 WIRE LTG. CKT. LF 985.00 1.70 1,674.50 4.35 4.284.75 4.50 4,432.50 2545.531 6 PVC HANDHOLE - TYPE LD EA 1.00 318.00 318.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 950.00 950.00 2545.553 METAL COVER (COMPLETE) SUBTOTALS: 5.262.62 9,677.25 9,472.50 BID B - ELECTRICAL ITEM NO./ CONTRACT SHAFER CONTRACTING CO NORTHWEST ASPHALT. IN ALEXANDER CONSTRUCTIO . MNDOT NO. ITEM UNIT UUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 1 CONNECT TO EXISTING LS 1.00 285.00 285.00 115.00 115.00 320.00 320.00 565.601 FEED POINI. 2 LIGHTING UNIT - TYPE R1 EA 1.00 2,145.00 2,145.00 2,050.00 2,050.00 2,400.00 2,400.00 2545.511 COMPLETE 3 2" RIGID STEEL CONDUIT LF 80.00 9.47 757.60 11.30 904.00 11.00 880.00 2545.521 (JACKED) 4 2" RIGID STEEL CONDUIT LF 54.00 8.84 477.36 5.50 297.00 9.90 534.60 2545.521 5 H6 - 3 WIRE LTG. CKT. LF 985.00 3.92 3.861.20 1.75 1,723.75 4.40 4,334.00 2545.531 6 PVC HANDHOLE - TYPE LD EA 1.00 840.00 840.00 325.00 325.00 941.00 941.00 2545.553 METAL COVER (COMPLETE) SUBTOTALS: 8.366.16 5,414.75 9,409.60 BID B - ELECTRICAL ITEM NO./ CON7 PAC I AIRES CONbIROCTIUN MNDOI NO. TrEM UN17 00AN1111 HMI 11-TIE AMOUNT mil. 1 put-. Amomr Mir I NTCE AMHHN7 IIIII 11111 MI =I MB • IN MI • MI 1•11 MB MI IIMI IN • ME MI 1111111 MI • MI al MI ININ MB UN NM MB MI MN MI MI INN MI NM all PI W I ILL: 7-90.,L ,1.14 91 (01 D - EL Lri1Li,. I. IIEM NO., CONIRACT (014 Th0C11014 1:INDM__NOt_ITEM UNIT_ _APHOOF U1111 115ICE _OMOUNT _ _ 1 CONNECT 10 EXISTING 1.00 315.00 5A5.601 FEED 1-0110 2 LIGHTING UNIT - TYPE (.0. EA 1.00 2,400.00 2,400.00 2545.511 COMPLETE 3 2" RIGID STEEL CONDUIT LF 80.00 10.50 840.00 2545.521 (JACKED) 4 2" RIGID STEEL CONDUIT LF 54.00 9.75 526.50 2545.521 5 116 - 3 WIRE LTG. CKT. LF 985.00 4.50 4.432.50 2545.531 6 PVC HANDHOLE - TYPE LD EA 1.00 935.00 935.00 2545.553 METAL. COVER (COMPLETE) SUBTOTALS: 9.449.00 • I CITYOF _-- -i 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147• CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 • (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 ' MEMORANDUM Ana, t? tr TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager Mxtc FROM Charles Folch, City Engineer DATE: June 19 , 1991 SUBJ: Approve Plans and Specifications for South Leg ile' -'' � Trunk Highway 101; Authorize Advertising for Bids r° -- q/ Project No. 90-20 The primary impetus for this project is based on the previously approved relocation of Trunk Highway 101 around the downtown area via Dakota Avenue/Trunk Highway 5/Market Boulevard which resulted from a TH 101/TH 5 Alignment and Land Use Corridor Study prepared in September of 1989 by Hoisington Group, Inc. You will recall that the first phase of this program involved the construction of Market Boulevard from Trunk Highway 5 south to the Rosemount driveway (Capital Improvement Project No. 88-22A) which was completed in 1990 . This proposed project encompasses the extension of new Trunk Highway 101 from its present terminus at Market Boulevard south approximately 1400 lineal feet to the existing Trunk Highway 101. This new segment of roadway will function as a temporary road as the ultimate alignment will likely be constructed in concert with the Trunk Highway 212 improvement project. The improvements associated with this project will involve clearing and grubbing, grading, construction of a rural roadway section, ditches, storm sewer and a realignment of the intersection with existing Trunk Highway 101. The side slope grading for the new roadway will necessitate a wetland alteration permit from the City. This item is scheduled for Planning Commission action on July 17, 1991 and City Council action on August 12, 1991 . All of the other pertinent agency permit applications have been made with the exception of the MnDOT permit which will be submitted pending approval of the project plans and specifications . The estimated total project cost is $320, 000 which has been proposed to be funded via tax increment/special assessments. As I had mentioned previously, this road improvement will function as a temporary road segment of new Trunk Highway 101. I I 11 Don Ashworth June 19 , 1991 Page 2 11 There are two primary reasons for the City to construct this temporary road segment. First of all , MnDOT has agreed to approve a redesignation of Trunk Highway 101 via Dakota Avenue, Trunk Highway 5 and Market Boulevard south of Trunk Highway 5 conditioned that the new Trunk Highway 101 would connect to the old existing Trunk Highway 101 . This also is the only route which MnDOT would consider for redesignation . Secondly, the Trunk Highway 212/Trunk Highway 101 improvement project may not be completed for another 10 years or so and would hamper redesignation of the current Trunk Highway 101 around the downtown area . Therefore, the City has made a commitment to MnDOT, Carver County and Hennepin County to do this temporary connection thus allowing Trunk Highway 101 to be redesignated by MnDOT and further relieve some of the traffic burden now being carried through the downtown roadway system. A tentative project schedule has been submitted by the project - consultant engineer which, pending plans and specifications approval on Monday night, tonight, would call for awarding the contract at the August 12, 1991 City Council meeting and a project completion by November 15 , 1991. A copy of the plans and specifications for this project are available in my office for review and inspection . I will also have a set available at the Council meeting on Monday night. It is therefore recommended that the plans and specifications for the South Leg Trunk Highway 101 Improvement Project No. 90-20 be approved and authorization by given to advertise for bids . ktm Attachments: 1. City Council minutes dated April 24, 1989 . ' 2 . Resolution No. 89-65 3 . Letter from Gary Ehret dated June 20, 1991. 4 . Project Schedule. 5 . Alignment Figures ( 2) . c: Gary Ehret, BRW I I I `-Cxty Council Meeting - Api 24, 1989 I/ about being forced to develop 37 individual properties with a septic system on every one. Looking at the outline of the land around there, there's going to be lir more people having that problem as we start having more people dumping into that soil. That whole thing, in my book, should wait for city water and sewer. It's not far down the road right now in Eden Prairie and they're coming this way. If he wants to wait 10 years, let's let him wait and get the city into it and do it right instead of making everybody put in water and their wells and their septic systems and then a couple years all of a sudden you're on city water and sewer. Thanks. Councilman Johnson: I'm at the point of saying, let's have staff come back to us with what the phasing plan was... Mayor Chmiel: Let's table it and which was shown previously and go from there. Councilman Johnson moved, Councilwoman Dimler seconded to table action on the I preliminary plat for Great Plains Golf Estates until the phasing plan is submitted. All voted in favor and the motion carried. c SELECT THE PREFERRED ALTERNATE FOR TH 101 PRELIMINARY ALIGNMENT STUDY (TH 101 TO eL' TH 5) . �ary Warren: As the Council may recall, we commissioned a study here to allow us to obtain land use input as well as alignment input for TH 101. The impetus for the study was actually the suihni.ttal by MnDot of the proposed official map for the TH 212 corridor of which an intersection was shown with TH 101. Our initial reaction to the area was that MnDot's plan was showing TH 101 would, from the intersection, off load traffic onto the current alignment of TH 101 which would then abut onto all the property owners as it currently does along Lake Susan. That did not seem to be a reasonable proposal although we have included it in this analysis as the do nothing alternative. As a result, the City commissioned Fred Hoi.sington and BRW to look at the alignment and land use issues. The current information in front .of you and Mr. Hoi.si.ngton is here tonight to go into the details as you see fit, deals primarily with the alignment of TH 101 and the four alternates that we looked at. Although in order to make some sense out of it, we did include some preliminary land use input so that you could see how the alignment does impact land use options in the corridor. There is a separate study that is going to be compiled for approval at a future date dealing specifically with adopting the land use alternatives. However, this is strictly to address the preferred alignment for. TH 101 from TH 212 to TH 5. At your discretion, Mr. Hoi.si.ngton is available with some charts to go into any details. Likewise we have some of the land owners and interested parties here. We had a very good, I thought public information meeting on April 17th and we got some good input there so would you like Mr. Hoisi.ngton to go into any presentation or what's your pleasure? I Mayor. Chmi.el: Is there anyone in the audience wishing to take another look see at what Fred has done previously? I've sat.through this probably about 3 times and I'm sure most of you sitting here have gone through it as many times as I have and the rest of the Council. Have you seen it? If not hearing any, we'll dispense with it because of the time that's fleeting. 48 , City Council Meeting II - nil 24, 1989 II Al Klingelhutz: I'd like to take this opportunity to address you. I g uess I'm one of those in favor of leaving the alignment where it is but I don't ' that's going to be possible. I've got neighbors to live with but I prefer Alternate 1. Some things about it that I don't like too well. You're going to I have single family dwellings with a road in front and a road in back and I think that's something that the Council never did like to see in any development. It happens to abut and be a good portion of my land that is in that area and I know II it's going to devalue the value of that land i.nbetween those two roads by a considerable extent. Looking at the zoning, I see some residential medium density right along the side of TH 212. I think with the impact of TH 212 coming in there, that maybe that should be a high density residential like apartments or something like that. Mr. Barts who owns a piece of land just to the north of my property, he's living down in Kentucky right now and I've been having quite a little correspondence with him. In fact, I've got his property II for sale and I think it would be sold if it wouldn't be for the fact that thes road alignments were being discussed. Also I would prefer it to stay on the old alignment down below there but he also prefers Alternate 1. The one thing he I did talk to me about, in that little center island there where it shows residential medium density and with the single family to the west of that spur that comes off of TH 101 going to 86th Street, he thought it should probably be II medium density all the way to that spur instead of that row of single family there. That would be this piece right in here. ill Councilman Johnson: Al? The only thing we're actually deciding on tonight is TH 101. Where the side streets go. What's it zoned. That's a different issue. They put it on here as an illustration only. This is a possibility. Any of the side streets except for of course 86th and Tigua, which are already there, are just illustrations. This is Fred's dream of what could be there in the future. Al Klingelhutz: When would we find out about the zoning on this property then? ICounciLman Johnson: That would be taken up with the Planning Commission, I'm taking II staff but I, nrice That ird be taken up ascomprehens comprehensive plan changeand zon gordnan . Is that fairly correct? Mayor Chmiel: Yes. I Councilman Johnson: But really we needed some kind of example of what could happen there and then we'll take in everybody's comments as to what will happen there because it's their. property. Everybody should have a lot of input. 1 Mayor Chmi.el! Right. I would say that the property owner should have some input on that. I Councilman Johnson: Right now it's where does TH 101 sit. You're saying number 1. You're saying Alternate 1. IMayor Chrniel: Alternate 1 is your preferred? Right. Councilman Johnson: Since number 4 you don't think politically would make it? Just leaving it where it is. li__ Uli Sacchet: Personally and from the viewpoint of the Hidden Valley IIneighborhood, even though I haven't been able to talk to too many about it, I 49 ..1 2 City Council Meeting - AprA., 24, 1989 I/ would also recommend Alternate 1. That's all I wanted to say. :1- Mayor Chmiel: Anyone else wishing to address that issue? If not, we'll bring it back to the Council. Further discussions? Councilman Workman: I'm disappointed I didn't get to hear Fred talk. I guess II if everybody's excited about number 1 or that seems to be preferable. Yes, I didn't like some of the offshoots the way they were laid out and maybe had some zoning questions but if that's not to be brought up this evening, I won't so I'd II go with number 1. E9Mayor Chmi.el: I guess from sitting in at the meetings which I've also done, and - 'listening to the people for their choice, I too would go for number 1. Councilman Johnson: I'm going to go with number 1 also because I think the prize is behind curtain number 1 here. I Councilwoman Dimler: I'm going to go with number 1 too. I listened at the Planning Commission and listened to all their comments and I thought they were very good and they decided number 1 was the best and if the residents agree, II I can't dispute that. Resolution #89-65: Councilman Johnson moved, Councilwoman Dimler seconded to I select Alternate 1 as the preferred alignment for TH 101 between the proposed TH 212 alignment and the southerly extension of Market Boulevard and to undertake the official mapping of that alignment during the month of May. Also, ii to call a public hearing for May 22, 1989. All voted in favor and the motion carried. I ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS: VERBATIM PUBLIC SAFETY COM`1ISSION MINUTES, PUBLIC SAFETY DIRECTOR. 1 Jim Chaffee: Just to make this real quick. At the beginning of the year we started taping our meetings at the Public Safety Commission meetings. Part of I the reason was to be consistent with the other commissions. The other part was to have a readily available access to the tone, if you will, of the meetings for ` us to go back and look at as staff after the meetings occurred. There seemed to II v be some controversy within the commission itself on whether or not to provide the verbatim Minutes. Some were for. Some were against. It was suggested at t, cll the last Public Safety Commission meeting to bring it back to Council to sea II what your preferences would be. Councilman Workman: How many for and against? Jim Chaffee: It's about broken right in half. II Councilman Workman: There's 7 commissioners though right? , - Jim Chaffee: That's right. 3 1/2 for and 3 1/2 against. 50 I il IICITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES , MINNESOTA DATE: April 24 , 1989 RESOLUTION NO: 89-65 IMOTION BY: Johnson SECONDED BY: Dimler II A RESOLUTION SELECTING THE PREFERRED ALTERNATE FOR TH 101 PRELIMINARY ALIGNMENT STUDY (TH 101 to TH 5) WHEREAS, a report was prepared by The Hoisington Group and BRW, Inc. , outlining four alternatives for the alignment of Trunk Highway 101 between the new proposed Trunk Highway 212 and existing Trunk Highway 5. The report includes input received I from a public information meeting held on April 17, 1989 at which over 23 people attended. I WHEREAS, after inputting the results of the land use poten- tial for each of the alternates and the roadway geometrics as it relates to the TH 212 layout, it appears that Alternative No. 1 I offers the best compromise in geometrics, land use and property owner concerns. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL II that Alternate No. 1 contained in The Hoisington Group's memo dated April 18, 1989 is hereby selected as the preferred alter- native. Further, that a public hearing be scheduled for May 22, I1989 to public input. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this II24th day of April , 1989. IATTEST: II ----- --a----(-Q ___ ik__ ...:— ACW- _.01? Don Ashworth, City Manager Donald J. -" miel, Mayor IYES NO ABSENT . I Chmiel Johnson None Hoyt Workman • IDimler I • �` 1'" 4Z�tc. .r. 1-34"7:"r ��nrea✓.•viw • JJ_�N 1O:Oa EF.�. IHC u ' isnx' hfl I 767--- 1 • ,June 20, 1991 I •1 , s.R w INC. Mr. Charles Folch • • City Engineer I City of Chanhassen ' • 690 Coulter Drive • Chanhassen, MN 55317 I RE: Plans and Specifications Approval ' TH 101/Market Boulevard South Leg j. CP 90-20 • . •• l Dear Mr. Folch: I Transportation We are currently completing the plans and specifications for the Engineering construction of TH 101/Market Boulevard from •its current terminus at II_ Urban Design . future Lake Drive East (Rosemount driveway) to existing TH .101 to the south. This project is a continuation of the phased relocation Thresher Square of TH 101 from its current designated route (through the downtown) 1 70C)Thed Street S' to its future route on Dakota/TH 5/Market Boulevard. The first Minnrapulu, phase of this project was the construction of Market Boulevard from . MN 55415 b1:1370•Q900 TH 5 to the Rosemount Driveway which was completed in 1990 (CP 88- Fax b13/i70 1378 22) . This project can be considered phase two which represents a II temporary connection from Market Boulevard to existing " Tti 101. minrkapul„ Future phases will include the reconstruction 'of the north leg of Phoenix TH 101 (Dakota Avenue) and ultimately the construction of a new TH II Denier 101 from Lake Drive East (Rosemount driveway) to future TH 212. Sr.PeternburF ' 'San Diego The.scope of this project will include the clearing and grubbing of Seattle the roadway right-of-way, roadway grading, the construction of about . 1,200 feet of new rural section roadway (with ditches), the nonedw.Rrngrase reconstruction of about 600 feet of existing TH 101, and.some storm • . 11 Richard P.Wolsield sewer. Existing TH. 101 wi t l intersect with this new alignment in a Peter E.Jdrvis "T" intersection as shown on the attached exhibit. Thomas F CarroI1 CraigA...Amundsen Please -note that we have shown a detailed detour for north-ind south Donald E.Hunt TH 101 traffic during the construction of the project. The roadway John :McNamara will be completely closed. ",, • ' Richard D.Pilgrim • Hale 1Z.Beckmann JeItrry L.&nsun R:ilph C.blunt . • Crary J.F.ri.kson . John C.Lynch I }Paul N.bay. ' ' JUN 91 10:C.D B�.J INC. '`°' II Mr. Charles Foich II June 20, 1991 Page 2 The construction of this project will require several agency Iapprovals including: . 1, City of Chanhassen . II' 2. Mn/DOT • • 3. Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District . 4. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) • II5. Army Corps of Engineers The project has been submitted to the Chanhassen Planning Department II for a Wetland Alteration Permit which will be in process over.the next 45 days. The other agency submittals have been made with the exception of Mn/DOT. Upon approval by the City Council , we will be IImaking this submittal as well . We have completed an Engineer's Estimate for the project based upon . the completed plans. The estimated construction cost for the II project is $320,000.00. Administrative and overhead costs will also be a part of the project costs. . We recommend that the City Council approve the plans and specifications and authorize advertisement for bids for this I project. If the Council chooses to proceed, a tentative schedule is - II ; outlined on the accompanying attachment. • Please let me know if we can be of further assistance. . IISincerely, II • B• ,, NC. y A./ hret, PE Project Manager • I - GAE/srb . • Attachments . •1 cc: File 7-9001 • ' II . I. . . 1004 BRIJ 11+,0 . • ,-.01~olitsittlEeKU,- I/ PROJECT SCHEDULE City of Chanhassen TH 101/Market Boulevard South Leg CP 90-20 Plan and Specification Approval June 24,1991 Permit Submittals Advertise for Bids •' July 11, 1991 • II Receive Bids August 2, 1991 Award Contract August 12, 1991 • 1 Preconstruction Conference . August 21, 1991 Start Construction August 26, 1991 . II • Complete Construction November 15, 1991 NOTE: The project has been submitted to the City of Chanhassen for a Wetland Alteration Permit. The tentative schedule assumes Planning Commission • approval on July 17, 1991 and City Council approval on August 12, 1991. • I 1 I. • • . . , • , • • • • • • • • ' IJUN 20 '91 10:04 BRW INCo P•5 . I r + ' _ __— ( -►r_ yam/ ..., . *-- C i'L."...4.: .'1,.., ..,_...,,-- ----74.-''4,1'''',41; ! .1„......)i,, ,..inr. .i....._._ :HI 5A ...e....k..,:::::„..... „,....-• ,..,e „.... , _,....1 LAKE DRIVE ��e, -.:_;, \ ,, '�, .. . . I MIK r .1.//,. g• ,,,FUTURE T.H. 101 : 7 ; �` y ■ _ `` —„so- ., 7 •••••■•,.•...:....C..:..-•1 (MARKET BLVD.) v •. .-, ‘ .:•- --.; : .- ) I ICJ.-:T STAGING , ,, 1 :a' _ W. PHASE i x ` 4y fr kW• " 11 1 • LAKE DRIVE CONSTRUCTED ' �-o� • s '" µ *MARKET BLVD. CONSTRUCTED ° '' ',•:' t,`�; ' ` -, , 1 - t ■ ,mot: �� ; `� R. EAST) ` ' (TO LAKE D � ii 4 OLD T.H. 101 REMAINS OPEN �:j= =� -r`, r�=;-#- ` _;�' �"' � '•E 1i 1990-or later) :÷1.- :,; -�# - 't , :%_: ,. •a. PHASE - it NEW T.H. . 1.01 CONSTRUCTED ,,.+r �:, * :y-s. - - --- __,^'`'a (SOUTH OF LAKE DRIVE EAST) . �:=: ,,..7- ..a.. __w�• • %•'r'". •OLD T.H. 101 REMAINS OPEN �.�� --- 0 ' RY (TEMP. CONNECTION' TO NEW T.H. 11) '.'t � i,; #!. '•''J a'( N. - -t •PHASE ill (Future) LL. -- ,,,,;,.:. ., .' • LAKE DRIVE EAST CONSTRUCTED i�' }' j��,�. i ISUSAN•OLD T.H. 101 ABANDONED I w ..: ., _ . ,y).„1!,,-,, ,,, ' • ,:». • • ji - 1,• . : _ ' ' . _ - .!.•'. IJUNE. 1991 -r.! "' �:-..• _.: -w 0.0('• ''. 4,2Z, - 'LI ' ,. _ r i. :(---e--- -.:.,.--::;:-... ‘,4-_,...0,; • I • 1 CITY OF Piepared by EIDE.tELw Figure , T_N 1(11 PFAI IC-INA/IFNT Srm ITN I Fr; '"`"'"'O• , !../.11% II r• .• v.! ,.. . • • • • •.... \ , ,, 1 ... ... _ ". • _,,,,.. „ ,- • . . • .i, ,.._A • ,..•••:. .,... : , ,, . ....,, ,,,,„,.. . . A nos •I .R I , o. E �._^ _' ;ter, ; r%Li Pi • E - _i + ,._• ��`�; i• tM� /ice-:.` ,�• • ', "IN -- - 1 ...wti: ',h,�,- p 1,z f • �c.u.••'.•a.s� 4i"'t��'---,i't ` 1 '1-1 •. •- .: ✓✓�, s e 1-` ,•.., • ■_ t t(�` Jf_�]_ r �`�.. .�� j... '1�'lF_ 1:J C31� a, • h•. / L~-I I ,I y611,,,Id t L , % , .L (p•(—�I1 1:, •-ctmk.- =sF—_ s . ' .' / •-' •�•ti., -• '•• 1 t• kll ,L.rl, ,,. I:1,1.•.tea ,•;,. ./' /'• -1 0 '• ., •�� - ..[[ WINW.nom wN\V.M _•.a . .- - - l:._ fM - --__T� L ._:7--......=`.,,,,•♦ ,,.. ?-_�.-..-_—, ---? —) -ti Ill'';',:.--15;----�/1 -,�;•;.l. .,,,.. ... •'I'`•� %� -' - s , - - _. 1.i.11p`� 1' 4 •`. 1 I , ° •a% { < y• /�'} �/� ., a I1 1 e may♦ t, _ "%% <: : - or,,.. Lz:/r \ \'1� i►�[.. � --t 1 \�•,h��►i 'ell I 1 •`• 1111111/10011 5�--;7 a3e-��-. 7.0.-;_;-_,, 1.t J....._ �.•�'46%;� �i --,.` �,£! - ;:t• •- A �` I' •••. -' k.v i--'-Y Tom. �_• P j. `� ••�� • ` K[rEtoPM£wf ' •!i t-j' r� ---:--,.'-'• F_- < f r •~I 1 •-�,•. `i-� r 1.-----Irk. �S -_• � lam' --.• lj t a ,� a-, >>•.: ��: ♦♦♦ - _ - �PA11R Y.M1- —�`a 1 ,f /�' IY,Z,'.::`..?:?.: 1 =� ',_'..81--I-.:"1.: _• a, \,,,,:. 'L •w.a•r'\/-•••,- -•.:.` __.--,:.:---'=:_,--- \` _•' tat-WYw'4.\ .f • -0 la• . , ,:�. I Ali + -. t;._: _ ,,. I i iii Y { 'C, 1i w�•s ! lay f/ t ■ - a r •--� - t� ��• • r�f 11�./�.!�i-. S M 1 ----____./ ti .+e. i: '� ,t 0,.! /w/� 5 ..+a,''�t1___�1., •:a, >,.•' N f�• �./ ;.. • \? B i • /h! ` •`� J/• •'/ !eta•+. �'�.�'� '�• r �i•�`.�3�`•-+-k `,� f I il.. . Mn i .• :!1 'r• 4 '��I At. Iso •}� i.1 :Y'.`• _-•s-_5.�:,�••-14?,a , •1r, i!,/.‘, ''Y s 1 , _ ''' ( L 1'.•1 1 'i"y` 'd t_.: .-- , ,• •• — --`' ..�' TEMPORARY I �/:.9 iT.H 1 O t .; . • • / �� • 1' �GNMENT .. . � �% r ' cm(of CHANHASS� 1 T.H.101 REALIGNMENT/ • v+arR ` r 'a/a t \\ � LAKE DRIVE ,� •♦• r...v.wu a0•a % T. . 1.O 1 • FEASIBILITY STUDY . f • er :I r 1 A IGNMENT ea-22 • :• = I' STREET•'"fr KE 1 `f : lE9[S WALKS/PAIRS :a ''.+ .• ..r_ ''. L� i FIGURE 2 !i�:' 4 STREETS m • •r1;:$.1*, It �'� `Z,. Z.. 1 I �.%�'` F •i 1 j•Q h•. _—.--.._? SIINO ��..RM ,o EOas+.r Tl*. • r ( 41: I i . •� 11lTIMA1[ ••4�4„••••EXISTING SI°EMLta •t • �•• • I i -.. :7,P;�•< i ; TEM..... • • p seams qa PR°POSED S*D4 NXIK, 1 . ill 111. MN NM IIIII MI Mill MI Mill i \S. -'fie :�1 1 .., .w io