Admin Section f ,
I
ADMINISTRATIVE SECTION
I
Letter from Robert Lindall dated June 16, 1991.
ILetter from West Hennepin Human Services dated June 20, 1991.
Memo from Scott Harr dated June 24, 1991.
Letter to Barr Engineering dated June. 26, 1991.
Letter to Westwood Professional Services dated June 26, 1991.
Letter to Orr-Schelen-Mayeron and Associates dated June 26, 1991.
ILetter to Short, Elliott, Hendrickson dated June 26, 1991.
Letter to Senator Jim Ramstad dated June 26, 1991.
Letter from Rick Schneider dated June 24, 1991.
ILetter from Johnson Equipment Company received on June 25, 1991.
Letter from Robert Erickson, City of Lakeville, dated July 1, 1991.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CG Paces .- / �-'J Tv,I
west hennepin human services planning board
e sough st. louts ark, minnesota 55416 L
4100 vemon avenu p
wart
bannapin 920-5533 1
human
iarvicat
I
1
FOR RELEASE. CONTACT: Lois Gunderson
June 20, 1991 612-920-5533 (o)
612-926-9457 (h) - I
HENNEPIN COUNTY RESIDENTS DIVIDED
ON TAXES AND SPENDING r
1-
ST LOUIS PARK , MN--Hennepin County residents are evenly split on the
question of increasing taxes to maintain county services versus reducing spending by
providing fewer services, according to a new poll released today by the sponsor of-an
upcoming Citizens Jury on Hennepin County budget priorities.
Hennepin County, which includes the city of Minneapolis, is Minnesota's largest
county and has a $ 1 1 billion budget for 1991. The county is currently considering -i
whether to make permanent a half-cent increase in the state's sales tax to be dedicated to
funding county services. (�
The poll was conducted by the West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board,
an independent planning and coordinating agency formed by area municipalities and
sponsor of the Hennepin County Budget Priorities Citizens Jury. Telephone interviews
were conducted between May 8 and May 31 with 600 county residents selected at
random. The survey is considered to be accurate within plus or minus five percent.
"We're eager to have the Citizens Jury panel provide a fresh perspective on
county spending," said Lois Gunderson, director of the budget priorities project and a I
community planner with the West Hennepin board. "An independent evaluation of
the county's mission and program effectiveness is especially important when residents��r` I,�`�
are divided over turning to fewer services or increased taxes."
JUN 2 0 1991 I 1
MORE
CITY OF CHANHAS$p\
1 1
1 '
Hennepin County Survey
Add 1
The survey also showed that county residents hold their park and library
' services in high regard, while giving the lowest marks to county roads and the court
system. When asked how they would reorder county spending, residents showed a strong
preference for more money for public health and human services and less money for
• maintaining public records and funding jails and detention services.
The survey will be provided to the Budget Priorities Citizens Jury to aid
the panel is developing its agenda for hearings. The Citizens Jury panel will have a
randomly-chosen group of 24 Hennepin County residents review and recommend
spending priorities for the county. The Citizens Jury panel will hold its introductory
session on July 20, conduct hearings on Sept. 6, 13 and 20, and make its
recommendations on Sept. 27.
{ The Hennepin County Citizens Jury project is led by a steering committee
comprised of County Commissioners Mark Andrew and Tad Jude; West Hennepin Planning
IBoard members Pat Meyer Levy and Dale Woodbeck; Peter Hutchinson, an independent
consultant working on a Minneapolis Foundation study of the county's budget; and
1 Gunderson.
The Citizens Jury process was developed by the Minneapolis-based Jefferson
Center, a political research and reform organization, to allow representative groups of
Irandomly selected citizens to evaluate issues and candidates.
In the last year, Citizens Jury panels have been sponsored by the League of
Women Voters of Minnesota to examine candidates in the state's 1990 gubernatorial
campaign; by the Rochester, Minn., Post-Bulletin newspaper to recommend
improvements in low income housing programs; and by the Rochester, Minn., School
District to set priorities for arts education funding.
MORE
1
I
Hennepin County Survey i
Add 2
Here are the survey results: I
1 ) The first questions I have for you are on your feelings about how Hennepin I
County spends the tax dollars it collects. I'm going to read you some of the
services the county provides. I want you to tell me if your impression is that
the service appears to you to be of high quality, average quality or low quality.
I
2 ) Now I'm going to go over the same list of services and I want you to tell me if you
are inclined to want to spend more money, the same amount, or less money on
each of them. e I
Question 1 Question 2 I
Quality Spend
Parks High 68% More 20%
1
Average 27.5 Same 68
Low 1 Less 10
Don't Know 3.5 Don't Know 2
Libraries High 62% More 33% •
Average 30 Same 61
Low 2 Less 5 111 Don't know 6 Don't Know 1
Human Services High 28% More 48%
(prompt-social services that Average 46 Same 35
would be provided to the poor Low 14 Less 13
elderly, mentally ill, abused Don't Know 13 Don't Know ,4
children and other vulnerable I
people)
Jails and Detention Facilities High 12% More 30%
111(prompt-like the workhouse Average 44 Same 45
the downtown jail, and juvenile Low 13 Less 14
detention) Don't Know 32 Don't Know 11
Court System High 16% More 27% I
(prompt-judges, county Average 52 Same 52
attorneys, and public defenders) Low 18 Less 14 I
Don't Know 14 Don't Know 6
Public Health High 41 % More 59%
I
(prompt-community clinics, Average 38 Same 34
Hennepin County Medical Center, Low 14 Less 7
AIDS prevention) Don't Know 7 Don't Know 2
I
MORE
I
I
1 ' .
IHennepin County Survey
Add 3
Question -1 Question 2 .
Quality Spend
I
County Roads High 23% • More 35% .
I (prompt-county roads and
bridges) Average 55 Same 53 .
Low 19 Less 9
- Don't Know 3 Don't Know 2
I Garbage Handling High 33% More 21
(prompt-garbage burner Average 45 Same 62
recycling, and landfills) Low 15 Less 13
IDon't Know 8 Don't Know 4
Maintaining Public Records High 31 % More 5%
(prompt-tax information, Average 48 Same 73
,1 birth certificates) Low 4 Less 14
Don't Know 18 Don't Know 8
1 3) If you were to choose one service as the one that has your highest support for use
Y of your property taxes, which one would it be?
I4) Which service do you support the least for the use of your property tax dollars?
I Question 3 Question 4
Highest Support Least Support
' Parks 15% 9%
r, Libraries 7 4
11 Human Services 32 9
Jails and Detention 5 15
'I Court System 2 9
1 Public Health 24 • 3
1 County Roads 7 10
7:,::1
Garbage Handling 7 8 _ -
Maintaining Public Records 1 28
IOther 2 6
=1 MORE
:1 •
Hennepin County Survey
Add 4
5 ) Some people think Henn epin County y s h ul d pro vi de fewer services in order to
reduce spending. Others feel it is important to provide these services even if it
means an increase in taxes.
If you have to choose one of these statements, which one would you agree with
most? I
Fewer Services 46%
Increased Taxes 48
Refused 3
Don't Know 3
6 ) Do you usually think of yourself as closer to the Republicans or Democrats? '
Republican 39%
Democrat 44
Neither 17
7 ) Would you please tell me in what age category you fall?
18to44 54%
45 and Over 46
8 ) What is the highest level school you have completed? '
Less than High School 5%
High School Graduate 21
Some College/Vo—Tech 34
College Graduate/Plus 40
9 ) Are you a person of color?
No 94%
Yes 6
Refused 1
10) Gender '
Male 44%
Female 56 '
For additional information, please contact Lois Gunderson at the West Hennepin
Human Services Planning Board, 612-920-5533. '
xx sr xr '
I
Hennepin
County Budge
I t t Priorities Citi Zens fury Jury-Timeline
•
r
1. Hennepin Count ■
y t3'opinion Survey. 600 ell ■
I
t'{en polled to create a representative Sable voters in Hennepin ■
I
p P County have 24 ' sample for a 24-member 1 1
Jurors selected Citizens
will be a microcosm Jury panel. V
daily of Hennepin Coun V
' Y stipend to make it possible for �• Jurors will
the broadest s be paid a
spectrum of people to take pan.
2. Introductory Day Jurors will receive a com V
II
nnepin County g over nment spending P r ehensive one day briefing on
T panel will then outline and services. V
ne key sub'
an )ect areas for hearings
V
li
the witnesses it will ask to testify.
f,
• Budget '',^` Y ,c-: Bi,C OP p
S Priority Hearings. �,�J 4.4.E a f # ury-
ngs. The jurors , �� .'MA '; • -4,-.v x yr `
r will conduct r , . . �� soPl ,.. .y� ry
days of hearings; "fi'
4' '� fi_`R
S one day a week for 't,- ;t. 7.
=u 've weeks. three con- V � .
Expert witnesses will be called to V
"y
s key budget areas. Residents will be invited to �' t0 D _� s • ' `
n , F � mot
spending questions. Visits will be made K' IUCQ� ,,-,),--Z .,,4:-,:-.7.-
s
o service programs. ade to s, ` 'S o. 77� . .c `..
�; y
Jurors will work with corn_
x-, � se
rdeIs to
evaluate various spending alternatives. �;.f
f the Citizens
Jury panel sessions i - — -4
will '� ud ER r.,
2. be open to the es Heading `�'
Ce t for ;_ � �,'�.: -�o!iti� � �. Y
P the final deliberations.
�` 1 '`
BER.F,
Priorities .,
Recommendations.
�i deli Following a -
berations 'W nd 7
the panel will issue �'f` 9e %-'pxj ��!� `�� �,_�
e recorn_
ions o " ' . 3l h ,aQC�/l1f11
ri
n budget w ` r z ration
Se priorities for :s rs.��; .
or Henne ,��'�t,"".,.4--,,1` dR,.� � � •� <`�- _, t4
Pin County. ,� : ,,� .B 27 Z99..,.. , 4,1e,....„. -. „
UPDATE/JUNE 1991
he first Budget Priorities and has a 1991 budget of$1.1 Hennepin Planning Board I
Budget Citizens Jury will have a billion. The county includes members Pat MeyerLevy and
Priorities randomly- chosen represen- Minneapolis, Minnesota's Dale Woodbeck,community
tative group of citizens review largest city. planner Lois Gunderson,and
Citizens Jury Slot
and recommend spending independent consultant Peter
priorities for Hennepin The panel is being conducted Hutchinson. The process is
County of Minnesota. The by the West Hennepin Hu- funded jointly by West
Process Citizens Jury will meet later manServicesPlanningBoard, Hennepin Human Services '
this year to provide Hennepin withcounselfromtheJefferson and a private foundation.
County residentsand officials Center of Minneapolis. The Similar Citizens Jury panels
with an independent per- project is led by a steering have been used in Minnesota 1
spective on the county's bud- committee comprised of to evaluate low-income hous-
get for 1992. Hennepin is CountyCommissionersMark ing,agriculturalwaterquality,
Minnesota's largest county Andrew and Tad Jude,West and organ transplant policies.
Charge to the jury
Here is the charge that will be given to the Citizens Jury panel: 1
Hennepin County has set its Levy limit at X%.(This amount will be set later this '
year prior to the Citizens Jury hearings).
r '
Within this fiscal constraint,the jurors are to decide which functions,services,and
other programs are to be funded.
The jury must first define the results it wants the county to achieve. Then it
should designate dollar amounts sufficient to obtain those results. '
1
Benefits to Hennepin County
1. A fresh perspective on county spending,independent from the normal
• pressures of special interests and past practice. _
2. A focus on what the county's essential mission and responsibilities are in a
time of fiscal constraints.
3. A citizens evaluation of the effectiveness of county services,with the
opportunity for public testimony.
CITIZENS JURY UPDATE/JUNE 1991
CITYOFCL>cc
CHANHASSEN ,Li,
1 �
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739
MEMORANDUM
TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager
Don Chmiel , Mayor
Todd Gerhardt , Assistant City Manager
Todd Hoffman, Park and Recreation Coordinator
Jerry Ruegemer , Recreation Supervisor
FROM : Scott Harr , Public Safety Director
DATE: June 24 , ,•991
SUBJ : Meeting with DNR Regarding This Article Marked
Milfoil Programming
I have scheduled a meeting on Wednesday morning, July 10 at 9 :30 AM
' the in Public Safety Conference Room with DNR Representative Tom Sak
to discuss the status of milfoil treatment . It should come as no
surprise to any of us that the milfoil problem has not lessened. A
' recent example is that we had worked out a joint agreement with the
City of Eden Prairie and the DNR to have approximately two acres of
milfoil treated on Lake Riley, which would have cost each of us
approximately $160 . 00 ( split three ways) ; however , in the short
' period of time between the inspection and the treatment , some 14
acres were found on the lake, costing $811 . 77 for each of the agen-
cies to pay. And this was only one lake.
I would like all of us to meet with the DNR to determine what fund-
ing is available; what the philosophy of treatment is now; and, to
' start taking a look at what direction we will be proceeding.
I hope you can make this meeting. If you have any questions ,
let me know. Thanks .
I
4
CITY OF
14��.y. . . 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
\ ClIANIIASSEN
„ ... „., ., ._ ..,„ .. .
, ._ ,., _.: 4„,,,,,.
,: .,, ,..„:„ .
_ 4 - (612) 937-1900 • FAX(612) 937-5739
June 26, 1991
Mr. Bob Obermeyer
I
Barr Engineering
7803 Glenroy Road
Bloomington, MN 55435
I
Re: Consultant Selection for Chanhassen's Surface Water Quality Program
File No. 7W-207C I
Dear Mr. Obermeyer:
On behalf of the City of Chanhassen I wish to thank you for presenting your I
proposal for the Surface Water Management Program. During this mcnth-long
selection process, the City has benefitted greatly by acquiring a variety of
ideas and information on how to best organize and develop the City's Surface
II
Water Management Program. We are aware of and acknowledge the extensive effort
and time carmitment dedicated by your firm to compete among the five finalists
chosen for this program. All of the presentations and proposals were of high II quality which made the decision process a bit difficult. However, after some
deliberation by the selection catmittee, •,the consulting engineering firm of
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc. joint-ventured with Braun
Intertec Environmental, Inc., has been selected for this program.
II
Again, thank you for your interest in providing services for the City of
Chanhassen.
I
Sincerely,
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
II
les D. Folch II
City Engineer
CDF:ktm II
c: Don Ashworth, City Manager II Todd Gerhardt, Assistant City Manager
Paul Krauss, Planning Director
Dave Hempel, Sr. Engineering Technician
City Council Administrative Packet (7/8/91) I
II
II
1 CITYOF
,u,
ClIANIIASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739
1
June 26, 1991
Mr. Ron Peterson
Westwood Professional Services, Inc.
7101 York Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55435
Re: Consultant Selection for Chanhassen's Surface Water Quality Program
' File No. PW-207C
Dear Mr. Peterson:
On behalf of the City of Chanhassen I wish to thank you for presenting your
proposal for the Surface Water Management Program. During this month-long
' selection process, the City has benefitted greatly by acquiring a variety of
ideas and information on how to best organize and develop the City's Surface
Water Management Program. We are aware of and acknowledge the extensive effort
and time commitment dedicated by your firm to compete among the five finalists
' chosen for this program. All of the presentations and proposals were of high
quality which made the decision process a bit difficult. However, after some
deliberation by the selection committee, the consulting engineering firm of
' Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc. joint-ventured with Braun
Intertec Environmental, Inc., has been selected for this program.
Again, thank you for your interest in providing services for the City of
' Chanhassen.
Sincerely,
CITY OF CHPNHASSEN
,4,0161roo‘
' Charles D. Folch
City Engineer
CDF:ktm
c: Don Ashworth, City Manager -
Todd Gerhardt, Assistant City Manager
Paul Krauss, Planning Director
' Dave Hempel, Sr. Engineering Technician
City Council Administrative Packet (7/8/91)
• 1
CITYOF
I
,4;4-"-,
•
1,1)/ CHANHASSEN
,. ._, ,, , „ . _ ..
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 '
7 *-4, -- (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739
June 26, 1991
Mr. Peter Willenbring I
Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates, Inc.
2021 Fast Hennepin Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55413 1
Re: Consultant Selection for Chanhassen's Surface Water Quality Program
File No. PW-207C I
Dear Mr. Willenbring:
On behalf of the City of Chanhassen I wish to thank you for presenting your II
proposal for the Surface Water Management Program. During this month-long
selection process, the City has benefitted greatly by acquiring a variety of
ideas and information on how to best organize and develop the City's Surface
II
Water Management Program. We are aware of and acknowledge the extensive effort
and time commitment dedicated by your firm to compete among the five finalists
chosen for this program. All of the presentations and proposals were of high '
quality which made the decision process a bit difficult. However, after some
deliberation by the selection committee, the consulting engineering firm of
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc. joint-ventured with Braun
Intertec Environmental, Inc., has been selected for this program.
II
Again, thank you for your interest in providing services for the City of
Chanhassen. I
Sincerely,
CITY OF CHANHASSEN I
Charles D. Folch II
City Engineer
CDF:ktm II
c: Don Ashworth, City Manager
Todd Gerhardt, Assistant City Manager II
Paul Krauss, Planning Director
Dave Hempel, Sr. Engineering Technician
City Council Administrative Packet (7/8/91)
II
II
II
CITYOF
. ..: . CIIANIIASSEN
..
1 r
"r'Y 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 -
°" (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739
June 26, 1991
1
Mr. Mark Loebermeier
Short, Elliott, Hendrickson, Inc.
1 3535 Vadnais Center Drive
St. Paul, MN 55110
1 Re: Consultant Selection for Chanhassen's Surface Water Quality Program
File No. 7W-207C
Dear Mr. Loebermeier:
On behalf of the City of Chanhassen I wish to thank you for presenting your
proposal for the Surface Water Management Program. During this month-long
1 selection process, the City has benefitted greatly by acquiring a variety of
ideas and information on how to best organize and develop the City's Surface
Water Management Program. We are aware of and acknowledge the extensive effort
1 and time commitment dedicated by your firm to compete among the five finalists
chosen for this program. All of the presentations and proposals were of high
quality which made the decision process a bit difficult. However, after same
deliberation by the selection committee, the consulting engineering firm of
1 Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc. joint-ventured with Braun
Intertec Environmental, Inc., has been selected for this program.
1 Again, thank you for your interest in providing services for the City of
Chanhassen.
il Sincerely,
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
II
& Folch
1 City Engineer
CDF:ktm
1 c: Don Ashworth, City Manager
Todd Gerhardt, Assistant City Manager
Paul Krauss, Planning Director
1 Dave Heel, Sr. Engineering Technician
City Council Administrative Packet (7/8/91)
1
1
CITYOF
` � s
CH ANHA SSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739
June 26, 1991
Senator Jim Ramstad
8120 Penn Avenue South #152
Bloomington, MN 55431
Dear Senator Ramstad:
As Mayor of the City of Chanhassen, I would like to express my
support for your proposed legislation regarding "Campus Sexual
Assault Victims Bill of Rights Act". I was surprised to read that
90% of rapes go unreported due to shame or victims not knowing
their rights. a I
I agree that the victims should know their rights and options.
However, I would suggest that you also consider including the
responsibility of the colleges in educating our students; ensuring
each student is aware of their rights, options and how to proceed
in exercising these rights if they should ever become a victim of
this criminal act.
I would also like to take this opportunity to thank you for
recognizing this serious problem and devoting your time and
energies into making sure our colleges are a better and safer place
in which to learn.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
/ 44,11
Donald J. Chmiel
Mayor
DJC:TG:k '
1
JIM RAMSTAD .
THIRD DISTRICT, MINNESOTA = = �
JUDICIARY COMMITTEE ` WASHINGTON OFFICE
1M_
504 CANNON HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING
SMALL BUSINESS COMMITTEE WASHINGTON,DC 20515
(202)225-2871
SELECT COMMITTEE ON
NARCOTICS ABUSE AND CONTROL Congret5 of tIje tiniteb 'tateg
DISTRICT OFFICE
DISABILITIES TASK FORCE 8120 PENN AVENUE SOUTH,#152
COCHAIRMAN 3ouge of 3epre5entatibeg BLOOMINGTON,MN 55431
(612)881-4600
Washington, IBC 20515
June, 1991
Dear Friend,
I'd like to bring you up to date on a very serious problem I am currently
working on in Congress and ask for your input and support.
As you may know, there has been a growing epidemic of sexual assaults on
our nation's college campuses. Studies show as many as one of four college
women will be the victim of rape or attempted rape during her four years
on a college or university campus.
Many sexual assault victims and their parents have pointed to the way
campus authorities treat allegations of sexual assault as a major problem
in addressing this issue.
Too often, campus authorities have tried to substitute themselves for our
criminal justice system by adjudicating rape cases themselves.
Unfortunately, in many cases, they have put the college's reputation above
the victim's best interest and acted in a way that downplays the crime and
even covers up the incident.
As a result of colleges and universities overstepping their bounds, many
victims are unaware of their legal rights and only 1% of all accused
rapists are ever prosecuted.
To address this problem I have introduced the "Campus Sexual Assault
Victims' Bill of Rights Act. " This legislation ensures that sexual assault
victims know their legal rights and options, and protects them from being
discouraged from exercising their rights.
Among other.provisions, the bill provides sexual assault victims with the
right to be represented at any campus disciplinary proceeding, to have
prompt and full investigation of sexual assaults and assistance in
obtaining evidence, as well as the right to live in campus housing which
guarantees no unwanted contact with alleged assailants.
I've enclosed some information about this legislation which now has 68 co-
sponsors in Congress. I would welcome any comments or suggestions you may
have, as well as your support of this legislation. -
S cerely,
Ji Ramstad
Member of Congress
PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
OHNSON EQUIPMENT CO. j
w li a 794- ,...) 11A. j 7•o
a// O ; 0 <..r +
COMM1.lr.,.• G a7�t •
.; N2..Cers , ;-7 A At01 ovk.- c. i -.3t / 1
City of Chanhassen .. June 24th 1991
690 Coulter Drive
Z tit ; it.sr A ¢ «, / Kz .s arm
P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, Mn. 55317 N :c t rt `c ; , '
CC - Ste,4 / A // ,4 gt c. Se. C4y i
Dear Steve-, Carl, Mark and all,
Just a note to say thanks for all your help on the Happy Garden II d
project. Because of the cooperative spirit of your department the /J
job went smoothly and quickly once started. I really appreciate
the fast and friendly response I always receive. .:XJ:7 i
C)'.,l'Sincerely, p
NI)"-----------1---- 4
_ —
Marie Marvin
Johnson Equipment Co.
firth-tee�-nf i
in o--l y�.- 1
vim,- v/r c
"/ . /c-si . 1
El
RECEIVED
.
JUN 2 5 1991 I
CITY Or t,riMivhASSEN
bl
._._._ 5141 LAKELAND AVE.N.
612-535-5444_J
MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55429 1
Lakevi([er �.- -` 1
41)
i ini
w- oj At--k ,
4,— ---iA
v-t �a
C 'A.
al
IJuly 1, 1991 G c"
1 Mr. Donald W. Ashworth
City Manager
t City of Chanhassen
P.O. Box 147
690 Coulter Drive
IChanhassen, MN 55317
•
IDear Don,
Congratulations on being recognized by ICMA for completing 25 years of service to
local government. Your personal contributions and achievements in the advancement
I of city management/administration are commendable. As you reflect on your years of
service, savor this milestone in your career.
I I hope you will have the opportunity to receive your award in person at the 77th
annual conference in Boston this Fall.
I As a colleague and friend, I just wanted to take this opportunity to acknowledge
this special occasion.
me Regards, __
I
I Robert A. Erickson
City Administrator
RAE:ve
I
RECEIVED
I JUL 02 1991
ICITY 0- Lnrti11rimo tfti
City of Lakeville
I20195 Holyoke Avenue • P.O. Box 957 • Lakeville, MN 55044 • (612) 469-4431 • FAX 469-3815