1d. Plan & Specs for south Hwy 101 irib.. �gJ I T Y O F --
C
ii
11 IV CHANHASSEN
1
- 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739
MEMORANDUM Acts^ fv Cr'', k..-h" -_
II t
TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager � `
F� i
FROM: Charles Foich, City Engineer Dt,��_ o
1 DATE: June 19 , 1991 Ora stbrn`.t .'r
r-
ISUBJ: Approve Plans and Specifications for South Leg ro` '" -,- .' I��Trunk Highway 101; Authorize Advertising for Bids 12 -A4- 9/
Project No. 90-20
IIThe primary impetus for this project is based on the previously
approved relocation of Trunk Highway 101 around the downtown area
1 via Dakota Avenue/Trunk Highway 5/Market Boulevard which resulted
from a TH 101/TH 5 Alignment and Land Use Corridor Study prepared
in September of 1989 by Hoisington Group, Inc . You will recall
1 that the first phase of this program involved the construction of
Market Boulevard from Trunk Highway 5 south to the Rosemount
driveway (Capital Improvement Project No. 88-22A) which was
I completed in 1990 . This proposed project encompasses the
extension of new Trunk Highway 101 from its present terminus at
Market Boulevard south approximately 1400 lineal feet to the
existing Trunk Highway 101. This new segment of roadway will
I function as a temporary road as the ultimate alignment will
likely be constructed in concert with the Trunk Highway 212
improvement project.
1 The improvements associated with this project will involve
clearing and grubbing, grading, construction of a rural roadway
section, ditches, storm sewer and a realignment of the
1
intersection with existing Trunk Highway 101.
The side slope grading for the new roadway will necessitate a
I wetland alteration permit from the City. This item is scheduled
for Planning Commission action on July 17, 1991 and City Council
action on August 12, 1991. All of the other pertinent agency
1 permit applications have been made with the exception of the
MnDOT permit which will be submitted pending approval of the
project plans and specifications . The estimated total project
cost is $320, 000 which has been proposed to be funded via tax
1 increment/special assessments .
As I had mentioned previously, this road improvement will
Ifunction as a temporary road segment of new Trunk Highway 101.
II
1 .
Don Ashworth
June 19 , 1991
Page 2
There are two primary reasons for the City to construct this
temporary road segment. First of all, MnDOT has agreed to
approve a redesignation of Trunk Highway 101 via Dakota Avenue,
Trunk Highway z' and Market Boulevard south of Trunk Highway 5
conditioned that the new Trunk Highway 101 would connect to the
old existing Trunk Highway 101 . This also is the only route
' which MnDOT would consider for redesignation . Secondly, the
Trunk Highway 212/Trunk Highway 101 improvement project may not
be completed for another 10 years or so and would hamper
' redesignation of the current Trunk Highway 101 around the
downtown area . Therefore, the City has made a commitment to
MnDOT, Carver County and Hennepin County to do this temporary
connection thus allowing Trunk Highway 101 to be redesignated by
MnDOT and further relieve some of the traffic burden now being
carried through the downtown roadway system.
' A tentative project —schedule has been submitted by the project
consultant engineer which, pending plans and specifications
approval on Monday night, tonight, would call for awarding the
' contract at the August 12, 1991 City Council meeting and a
project completion by November 15 , 1991 . A copy of the plans and
specifications for this project are available in my office for
review and inspection . I will also have a set available at the
Council meeting on Monday night.
It is therefore recommended that the plans and specifications for
' the South Leg Trunk Highway 101 Improvement Project No. 90-20 be
approved and authorization by given to advertise for bids .
' ktm
Attachments: 1. City Council minutes dated April 24, 1989.
2 . Resolution No. 89-65
3 . Letter from Gary Ehret dated June 20, 1991 .
4 . Project Schedule.
5 . Alignment Figures ( 2) .
c: Gary Ehret, BRW
I
City Council Meet ig - Api 24, 1989
about being forced to develop 37 individual properties with a septic system on
I:-
every one. Looking at the outline of the land around there, there's going to be
more people having that problem as we start having more people dumping into that
soil. That whole thing, in my book, should wait for city water and sewer. It's
not far down the road right now in Eden Prairie- and they're coming this way. If
he wants to wait 10 years, let's let him wait and get the city into it and do it
right instead of making everybody put in water and their wells and their septic
systems and then a couple years all of a sudden you're on city water and sewer.
Thanks.
Councilman Johnson: I'm at the point of saying, let's have staff come back to 1
us with what the phasing plan was...
• Mayor Chmiel: Let's table it and which was shown previously and go from there.
Councilman Johnson moved, Councilwoman Dimler seconded to table action on the
preliminary plat for Great Plains Golf Estates until the phasing plan is
submitted. All voted in favor and the motion carried.
QsSELECT THE PREFERRED ALTERNATE FOR TH 101 PRELIMINARY ALIGNMENT STUDY (TH 101 TO
eLd' TH 5) .
,t �ary Warren: As the Council may recall, we commissioned a study here to allow
us to obtain land use input as well as alignment input for TH 101. The impetus
for the study was actually the submittal by MiDot of the proposed official map
for the TH 212 corridor of which an intersection was shown with TH 101. Our
initial reaction to the area was that MiDot's plan was showing TH 101 would,
from the intersection, off load traffic onto the current alignment of TH 101
which would then abut onto all the property owners as it currently does along
Lake Susan. That did not seem to be a reasonable proposal although we have
included it in this analysis as the do nothing alternative. As a result, the
City commissioned Fred Hoisington and BRW to look at the alignment and land use
issues. The current information in front of you and Mr. Hoisington is here
tonight to go into the details as you see fit, deals primarily with the
alignment of TH 101 and the four alternates that we looked at. Although in
order to make some sense out of it, we did include some preliminary land use
input so that you could see how the alignment does impact land use options in
the corridor. There is a separate study that is going to be compiled for
approval at a future date dealing specifically with adopting the land use '
alternatives. However, this is strictly to address the preferred alignment for
TH 101 from TH 212 to TH 5. At your discretion, Mr. Hoisington is available
with some charts to go into any details. Likewise we have some of the land
owners and interested parties here. We had a very good, I thought public
information meeting on April 17th and we got some good input there so would you
like Mr. Hoisington to go into any presentation or what's your pleasure?
Mayor. Chmiel: Is there anyone in the audience wishing to take another look see
at what Fred has done previously? I've sat through this probably about 3 times
and I'm sure most of you sitting here have gone through it as many times as
I have and the rest of the Council. Have you seen it? If not hearing any,
we'll dispense with it because of the time that's fleeting.
48
City Council Meetin
g
Afr
- ril 24, 1989
1
Al Klingelhutz: I'd like to take this opportunity to address you. I guess I'm
one of those in favor of leaving the alignment where it is but I don't think
that's going to be possible. I've got neighbors to live with but I prefer
Alternate 1. Some things about it that I don't like too well. You're going to
have single family dwellings with a road i.n front and a road in back and I think
that's something that the Council never did like to see in any development. It
happens to abut and be a good portion of my land that is in that area and I know
it's going to devalue the value of that land inbetween those two roads by a
considerable extent. Looking at the zoning, I see some residential medium
density right along the side of TH 212. I think with the impact of TH 212
coming in there, that maybe that should be a high density residential like
apartments or something like that. Mr. Barts who owns a piece of land just to
the north of my property, he's living down in Kentucky right now and I've been
having quite a little correspondence with him. In fact, I've got his property
for sale and I think it would be sold if it wouldn't be for the fact that these
road alignments were being discussed. Also I would prefer it to stay on the old
alignment down below there but he also prefers Alternate 1. The one thing he
' did talk to me about, in that little center island there where it shows
residential medium density and with the single family to the west of that spur
that comes off of TH 101 going to 86th Street, he thought it should probably be
medium density all the way to that spur instead of that row of single family
there. That would be this piece right in here.
Councilman Johnson: Al? The only thing we're actually deciding on tonight is
TH 101. Where the side streets go. What's it zoned. That's a different issue.
They put it on here as an illustration only. This is a possibility. Any of the
side streets except for of course 86th and Tigua, which are already there, are
just illustrations. This is Fred's dream of what could be there in the future.
Al Klingelhutz: When would we find out about the zoning on this property then?
' Councilman Johnson: That would be taken up with the Planning Commission, I'm
taking over for staff here but I've heard this before. That would be taken up
as comprehensive plan change and zoning ordinance. Is that fairly correct?
' Mayorr Chmiel: Yes.
Councilman Johnson: But really we needed some kind of example of what could
happen there and then we'll take in everybody's comments as to what will happen
there because it's their property. Everybody should have a lot of input.
Mayor ChTniel Right. I would say that the property owner should have some
input on that.
Councilman Johnson: Right now it's where does TH 101 sit. You're saying number
1. You're saying Alternate 1.
Mayor Chmi.el: Alternate 1 is your preferred? Right.
Councilman Johnson: Since number 4 you don't think politically would make it?
Just leaving it where it is.
Uli Sacchet: Personally and from the viewpoint of the Hidden Valley
neighborhood, even though I haven't been able to talk to too many about it, I
49
to 4-7
City Council Meeting - Apr_.,. 24, 1989 1
would also recommend Alternate 1. That's all I wanted to say.
Mayor Chmiel: Anyone else wishing to address that issue? If not, we'll bring
it back to the Council. Further discussions?
•
Councilman Workman: I'm disappointed I didn't get to hear Fred talk. I guess
if everybody's excited about number 1 or that seems to be preferable. Yes, I
didn't like some of the offshoots the way they were laid out and maybe had some
zoning questions but if that's not to be brought up this evening, I won't so I'd
go with number 1.
Mayor Chmi.el: I guess from sitting in at the meetings which I've also done, and
• listening to the people for their choice, I too would go for number 1.
Councilman Johnson: I'm going to go with number 1 also because I think the
prize is behind curtain number 1 here.
Councilwoman Dimler: I'm going to go with number 1 too. I listened at the r
Planning Commission and listened to all their counents and I thought they were
very good and they decided number 1 was the best and if the residents agree,
I can't dispute that.
Resolution #89-65: Councilman Johnson moved, Councilwoman Dimler seconded to
select Alternate 1 as the preferred alignment for TH 101 between the proposed
TH 212 alignment and the southerly extension of Market Boulevard and to
undertake the official mapping of that alignment during the month of May. Also,
to call a public hearing for May 22, 1989. All voted in favor and the motion
carried.
ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS:
VERBATIM PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION MINUTES, PUBLIC SAFETY DIRECTOR. r
Jim Chaffee: Just to make this real quick. At the beginning of the year we
started taping our meetings at the Public Safety Commission meetings. Part of
the reason was to be consistent with the other commissions. The other part was
to have a readily available access to the tone, if you will, of the meetings for
us to go back and look at as staff after the meetings occurred. There seemed to
be some controversy within the commission itself on whether or not to provide r
the ver_bati.m Minutes. Some were for. Some were against. It was suggested at
the last Public Safety Commission meeting to bring it back to Council to sea
what your preferences would be.
Councilman Workman: How many for and against?
r
Jim Chaffee: It's about broken right in half. I
Councilman Workman: There's 7 commissioners though right?
Jim Chaffee: That's right. 3 1/2 for and 3 1/2 against.
r
50
r
Dc.-/ - 0
IICITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES , -MINNESOTA
IIDATE: April 24 , 1989 RESOLUTION NO: 89-65 -
IIMOTION BY: Johnson SECONDED BY: Dimler
A RESOLUTION SELECTING THE PREFERRED ALTERNATE FOR TH 101
IPRELIMINARY ALIGNMENT STUDY (TH 101 to TH 5)
WHEREAS, a report was prepared by The Hoisington Group and
I BRW, Inc. , outlining four alternatives for the alignment of Trunk
Highway 101 between the new proposed Trunk Highway 212 and
existing Trunk Highway 5. The report includes input received
I from a public information meeting held on April 17, 1989 at which
over 23 people attended.
' WHEREAS, after inputting the results of the land use poten-
tial for each of the alternates and the roadway geometrics as it
relates to the TH 212 layout, it appears that Alternative No. 1
offers the best compromise in geometrics, land use and property
Iowner concerns.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL
I that Alternate No. 1 contained in The Hoisington Group' s memo
dated April 18 , 1989 is hereby selected as the preferred alter-
native. Further, that a public hearing be scheduled for May 22,
1989 to public input.
IIPassed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this
I24th day of April , 1989.
ATTEST:
II /6/a Cal-L.. .../ 11)
4.._. ..:__. / ig&P„
Don Ashworth, City Manager )(
Donald J. -' miel, Mayor
IYES NO ABSENT
Chmiel None Boyt
I Johnson
Workman
Dimler
II
II
II
,;-,. .t: -^seeray�r�nafvyr.arr..w..sw . _
4 ' '`,!,'`YI:irl 20 '91 1 U;G2 t'T I NC a G�; -A tt•+
I
-
R ,
,: I
,tune 20, 1991 •
1
/3.1%. tic.
I Charles Folch
- City Engineer I City of Chanhassen
• 690 Coulter Drive
Chanhassen, MN 55317
RE: Plans and Specifications A pp roval . '
TH 101/Market Boulevard South Leg .
CP 90-20 ,• II
• Dear Mr. Folch:
• Punning I
Transportation We -are currently completing the plans and specifications for the
Engineering
Urban Design construction of TH 101/Market Boulevard from its current terminus at _
future Lake Drive East -(Rosemount driveway) to existing TH .101 to
the south. This project is a continuation of the phased relocation
Thresher Square of TH 101 from its current designated route (through the downtown)
70l)Third Street So. to its future route on Dakota/TH 5/Market Boulevard. The first II
Minneapolis, phase of this project was the construction of Market Boulevard from
MN 55415
b���s7o•o70o TH 5 to the Rosemount Driveway which was completed in 1990 (CP 88-
Fax b12 13 70-13 7ti 22) . This project can be considered phase two which represents a . '
'temporary connection from Market Boulevard to existing TH 101.
Minneapolis Future phases will include the reconstruction 'of the north leg of
Phoenix: TH 101 (Dakota Avenue) and ultimately the construction of anew TH
D4myer 101 from Lake Drive East (Rosemount driveway) to future TH 212. 11
St.Petersburg ,
•San Diego The scope of this project will include the clearing and grubbing of
Se,atk the roadway right-of-way, roadway grading, the construction of about I
1,200 feet of new rural section roadway (with ditches), the
Donald W'.Ringrose reconstruction of about 600 feet of existing TH 101, and some storm
Richard PWolsteld sewer. ' Existing TH 101 will intersect with this new alignment in a '
' Peter E.Jarvis "T" intersection as shown on the attached exhibit. ,
Thomas F Carroll 11 Craig A..Amundsex Please •note that we have shown a detailed detour for north-and south
Donald E.Hunt TN 101 traffic during the constrwction of the project. The roadway
JohnB McNarnara will be completely closed. .
Richard D.Pilgrim
Tale K Beckmann .
• Jeffrey L.Benson .
Ralph C.EUum , ' . I
Gary J. �i:kson
F. -
John C.Lynch .
Pau!N.bay I
•
• Juil-c6-'91 1G3.77' FplJ INI,o vserverristormtvt
I
IIMr. Charles Foich
June 20, 1991
IPage 2
. The construction of this project will require several agency
approvals including:
1. City of Chanhassen
II 2. Mn/DOT
• 3. Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District
4. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) -
5. Army Corps of Engineers
I The J
ro'ect has been submitted to the Chanhassen Planning Department
P
for a Wetland Alteration Permit which will be in process over the
I next 45 days. The other agency submittals have been made with the
exception of Mn/DOT. Upon approval by the City Council , we will be
making this submittal as well .
I We have completed an Engineer's Estimate for the project based upon
' the completed plans. The estimated construction cost for the
I project is $320,000.00. Administrative and overhead costs will also
be a part of the project costs.
II We recommend that the City Council approve the plans and
specifications and authorize advertisement for bids for this
project. If the Council chooses to proceed, a tentative schedule is .
Ioutlined on the accompanying attachment. .
Please let me know if we can be of further assistance. -
IISincerely,
B' , NC.
y A./ hret, PE .
• Project Manager
I - GAE/srb
Attachments
cc: File 7-9001
I .
• '
I . '
-:. - r•' m°w.+ese�+vass•uM.i x�a , .�q :�1{., ,,a.; i
._�.......,.�.TIJJ`J c�1 ''.J1 b� )✓RlJ II �.7 r 4
II
PROJECT SCHEDULE I
City of Chanhassen • I
TH 101/Market Boulevard South Leg
CP 90-20
Plan Specification Approval June 24
lan and p pp 1991,
Permit Submittals ,
Advertise for Bids July 11, 1991 -
Receive Bids August 2., 1991 .I
Award Contract August 12, "1991 j
Preconstruction Conference August 21, 1991
•Start Construction F August 26, 1991 • I
•
•
Complete Construction November 15, 1991
NOTE; The project has been submitted to the City of Chanhassen for a Wetland •
Alteration Permit. The tentative schedule assumes Planning Commission
approval on July 17, 1991 and City Council approval on August 12, 1991.
•
•
•
1
I
II
•
•
•
•
•
•
1
1
I • JUN 20 '91 10:04 ERN INC. F.5_i_r____,m.:__. . _f •
� -� mss- -
J
- !y! Y'I
.stio.0 _ - 1.
I �- 4,--. _°■ �ti�-�:=rte' r
_---� rte=^' -- irr,- °, I:
�yvr_ _�+f- Ir
LAKE DRIVE .7: 7..0 ari.L. _.„.0.......„..,..:: .__..I- '^ '\ - .
sue _ '`. 1-• \\S���./ _ � ;
tM, ..."7-.'•=7-----'
_—b=� ,1`- _- v'r.• I X0 1► i
',,i , i' '_./ !r+/.%,.' —4y.���•_:9.E.:�,- a:` �1jr =:, = Co- -�1
•FUTURE T.H. 101 -..., ,}-- t, \ , ry.,. �♦ " °� - DNS.. ,•
(MARKET BLVD.) lit,- - , !' /), \ ~I 0�J STAGING ti - . L1 ' ffl p��j'
., :"r u ` + 1 I. •t 1
,.A-- , L tF•�,r - / i "' }'t L . % '.. " ;i ryi•∎''. - .JM:;
PHASE 1 ( 1989) � ,�,..?' r, :.�a•` _ �.
I,A' I r =-'....f.,,%....,--.... -=-,;---7,-_..........----..---.,- J �\ fiit^� a'^NY-. O��
• LAKE DRIVE CONSTRUCTED / -':- -• ► .—' ° ;M,,, -' 1
BLVD. CONSTRUCTED ' . .";, -� '
•MARKET .*, * ��` ,-,o
<. (TO LAKE DR. EAST) 1\ ,1 �,�_ r ° _ .r. :-. 11 ,tom
al OLD T.H. 101 REMAINS OPEN - ``'` =�1°� f '`
-- J^. t -r..I ,•~ - =-:,.,...“:7:e'
PHASE 11 ( 1990-or later) , .. 'a,ly., k,- -a_-. .-
414 rr
• NEW T.H. 101 CONSTRUCTED r , •` �. = - _
'..j,----2.1-i--:-?..1:51_,,,
, ) frr'., _h, i:ma y ..
(SOUTH OF LAKE DRIVE EAST) •• ' ''( .. (''``, ,�., _ ' r'"�''::
•OLD T.H. 101 REMAINS OPEN ` ,, •-,,,I„ ,I.., -;� �
(TEMP. CONNECTION, TO NEW T.H. 141) �- .; J;g ;h -- --� N -tom
i PHASE ill (Future) E z> �=7-'-'-77--- �, `' .t
"fir :c:.� � ....:_," �I�
• LAKE DRIVE EAST CONSTRUCTED I j ` '+ j 1`
• OLD T.H. 101 ABANDONED I ` -' Fj; �'�(1� TOY
sus+, w.: ....:t:„_.4/...: .gi i \ 1`. iii
- 40 .,.....-p. ...,...” itif --\ . . ..... _ _
JJ - -' - .-.4,
.JUNE 1991 �� .■ . e* / ,-. -« -y..- ' :--..,,"
R,
I
CM OF Prepared by
\ .lam C}1A1IflAEN. f=igure 1 .2VB E
WW.
T.H. 101 REALIGNMENT SOUTH LEG ''"°'
..
1 r _ 1411 r• e� -_ �_ - 5.�.-- �•.
' ,� ._-....SL`Y* .- •---- / .—� I -- Ct�„, , cr. n19�t rat p `'t / i - .. �.��.' • lD
a at W !• I two,- et�_ ;3-~-_ii �„� t ! �/ ~ try .-i M '
♦ PAQY. i '. L_1----� ''~~- "ST •I>�`°�,:•� •- -�/.r.• .:a.. ---• cn
' ♦ / . --� �,.• _ I:4 e e 1 1•i /. `it \ 4'4 ttrtRI
♦ - .. ♦ l 111_ J t...OV. a01[I nrl.�' _7 L �T..^ �• —
— — — • 1 • J I c. 7 i w
- �.z_. • !!�J f f• a�•i�r•�ir_.�_. ae• �Y °�'li°•awp"°".'°e�tv''.s
f U i +ii♦i ° _ :, `"a-J V� --, — -,yyJ: � 1ac0 t �':i }/'� �/� I o
1 V� t ' �♦► ! Yz `:° �$ •- -. ... t r-I ...•..=.y.,ac,•'s♦`f!�'?�': '' "�-..-fir' �/%'_ wASaan'ot• 'j
Qd�~ 'I p�\��t r� ti \\\.a♦♦a. '1• inc.. o�i..��. •- �.,:, �' �.V....."sip±..-- ��..i•J- ---1-,'.... �..;. - - ' T : _ - � ,
Il i `� �� l �•�► \ �I �(! �`i �,a 1 0..0•.11 ,La= yam_ _-'; • 's''rJi.jam, ti i- .t .I
0 l—"L) :� •+i�\ -=m1 Y�-� I :,: - ,y R I O c •..••' ix s -... .' .--e ��47 1 n''I Ste
'L� s, � � OF♦� I of§ i /' J,.s�t M ap - yt yam:) t Y - -' l k 1 .'{ `_r;�:./ l ;.
-_t ._ \. A,q \ `. ♦,• ' x^c '-'� , , •�t ▪ / '�_:'- +< •v i`_' --r _Tom. �`._._T<r {5
✓'��_.,__ '11 Q�..� fi L .�4 „ri..,_ ▪ ..A^ _DE r 7J y,- ' i/ ' 6 I J�7 t---^_
l is `. '''� _ TE,oIY�Nrl: / G t a I f�~-%: �.
tea I� 1. r== yT�r .. ♦ • - - `x°' • `s-PARK . '?\\•� /� Y ^�::: ,= ;1- fir' 4',.�. �
' /\_\•�� A J( i//ter (L�• • I ,-c __;i?:'., •
l " •1114 0.101 �.� - �. '+� ,.: q,'_ sq _
i ..--' ..--' S `• ._ ,.. __ :�. - :--311, i /// I• ra,..,,/,•, '., .r_ V••` ,
'1 J Ste" - 1 •e,, P+ r+ s �>-r'^K. •. _ '� %\ 'V';r`�_ �'`
��i ;! off • , �`�.�Jr �• '''""..w., , •/ h c'• /• < '. 1—' F
�,. f, �, `o .n• ' ..4, \ .ice'+- t, c''1 Oa ;l. :e I.�`,i�3r ~;��` `
�' is'f • 4n '.- .I pt ',• % %j, � ,'• _iyii , `%. 1`w` —i.-✓t.: j�
1,AP� r I ; � �.IL I' `. • •1•.411_ • Iv f-.��-J ,
�%`% 1 TEMPO S �.
�t tt IMENT L °' crry of c�ANHASSt l
1F;f \` 1 F` �/ / T.N.10S REALIGNMENT/ I t' y
�U .13R
+ ♦♦ b 11.1140 i- 1 Fla t: LAKE UIRIYE t
�� ♦• wsse.+.�.•.• ttauc+rL �I-fl Ta • �•� FEASIBILITY STUDY
c
' �' 10.10•' • f' \'`• A IGNMENT °_♦ 6e-�s ��:
�� , 1 l ▪r"` STREET "TJ '
;�,:'G ,` �aKE t FI G I R 2 t l STREETS YrALKS/PkIMiS
-ry'• c'° �`W.•.r� \ I i �II�}• .'.� ( ,.. LEt EKISTING ��.EXISTING OWE DATIL•
'if:r- .:.. I _ .R:0,+ , -- , ! '-- •� IILTMIATE RDPOSE6 DIKF PFTN
_ 1 �- 717". ,- I ww+r+aaaa•.w EXISTNO SIDEWALK i
�•-- I I i viY::fP�C°i I ; TEYt40RARY ►a aao as as 1MLDPOSED SIDEWALK
i _ivt.� ,It
�I I .� 1111.....__1;1;_ i F.;.:7'1u - I