Loading...
A. Municipal Consent TH 212CITYOF CHAN E 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1 I20 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.i 125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site ~w,w. ci.chanhassen.mn.us ,A MEMORANDUM TO: Paul Oehme, City Engineer/Dir. of Public Works FROM: DATE: Matt Saam, Assistant City Engineer~z~ January 20, 2004 SUBJ: Municipal Consent Public Hearing for TH 212 Project No. 03-09-1 REQUESTED ACTION (No Vote Required) The City Council is requested to hold a public hearing on the Mn/DOT submitted plan layout for TH 212. BACKGROUND On July 28, 2003, the City Council adopted a resolution supporting the accelerated funding of new 212. On November 10, 2003, the City Council approved a consultant contract with Kimley-Horn and Assoc. for municipal consent services on the project. On December 8, 2003, the City Council called a public hearing to be held January 26, 2004 on the project. DISCUSSION As required by State Statute, the City must hold a public hearing on the Mn/DOT submitted layout for new TH 212. The City Council has up to 90 days from the date of the public hearing to either approve or disapprove (by resolution) the layout. City staff and our consultant, Kimley-Horn, have previously reviewed the layout and cost estimate. A list of issues/concerns has also been generated and submitted to Mn/DOT for their review. Mn/DOT's response letter to the City's review comments is attached. Jon Horn, of Kimley-Horn, will update the Council at the public hearing on which issues have been resolved and those that are still of concern. Mn/DOT's cost estimate for City participation on the project has decreased from $3.4 million to $2.1 million. It should be noted that this cost does not include any proposed City water or sanitary sewer cost. These utility costs will be identified with the upcoming feasibility study for the 2005 MUSA area. The City of Chanhassen · A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming dov,,ntov,,n, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. Staff has envisioned the following process for the public hearing: 1. Staff introduces Mn/DOT. 2. MnDOT will give a short project overview and touch on.key issues in Chanhassen. 3. Staff/Consultant will then give an update on any remaining issues. 4. Council questions. 5. Mayor opens public hearing. 6. Due to time constraints, public hearing is continued during regular Council meeting. 7. Staff/MnDOT will answer the public's questions as necessary. 8. Mayor will close public hearing. jms Attachments: 1. Kimley-Horn response letter on Mn/DOT comments. 2. Mn/DOT response letter to City issues. 3. Revised cost estimate. c~ Jon Horn, Kimley-Horn Jon Chiglo, Mn/DOT Lisa Freese, Mn/DOT g:\eng\th 312\municipal consent\public hearing memo.doc JAN, 21, 2004 7'48AM KIMLEY-HORN NO, 688 P. 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc, January 19, 2004 Mr. Matt Saam, P,B- Assistant City Engineer City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 · 8uYm 34~N :Z550 UniYer~ity Avenue Wesl SL Paul, Minnesota ~114 TH 212 Municipal Consent, City Project No. 03-09 Mn/DOT Response to Review Comments Dear Mr. Sram: Mn/DOT has provided responses to the various issues identified ~ our January 6, 2004 comment lett~ for the TH 212 municipal consent process. A copy of the January 16, 2004 Mn/DOT response letter is attached. Mn/DOT has agreed to accept many of the layout changes requested by the City. The following is a summary of the M.u/DOT responses to each of the City's commeats, LAYOUT REVIEW . Bluff Creek PedesttSan Trail Underpass · Design constraints requ/re that the mdc-x-pass structure be constructed as one arch structure rather than two as requested by City staff. The use of one structure is acceptable to City staff. Fox Propea'ty Access · Mn/DOT has agreed to provide access to the Fox property; however, the location of the access has not yet been defined. Future plans for TH 212 should show the location of this Screening Berms · Mn/DOT has agreed to the City's request for screening berms along the corridor. City staff will have the opportunity for additional review of the design/location of the screening berms · TEL 6~1 64.~ 4197 F~ 651 645 5116 JAN, 21, 2004 ?'48AM KIMLEY-HORN NO, 688 P, 3 Kimley-Hern and Associates, Inc, Mr. Matt Saarn, P.E. January 19, 2004 Page 2 of 5 . , 6~ , , and other landscaping along the comdor a~ ~e prehminary and final design of TH 212 proceeds. Fox Property Tra/1 Connector · Mn/DOT has stated that the construction of the future Fox property trail connector w/il need to follow Mn/DOT's traditional permitting process. This will require application for a Limited Use Permit to construct and maintain the trail within Mn/DOT right-of-way. It is recommended that the City initiate ti'tis process ov~ rte next few months so that the Limit Use Permit can be obtained and the trail design/construction can be coordinated with the construction of TH 212. TH 101 Access for Park and Ride Facility · Mn/DOT has agreed to the City's request. TH 101 Access for Curry Property · Mn/DOT has agreed to the City's request; however, the City will incur additional turn lane and signal costs for the addition of this access. The need for this access should be discussed with the property owner since assessments could be used to fund some or all of these additional costs. Lyman Boulevard (CSAH 18) Access for Curry and Klein Properties · MrffDOT has agreed to tiao City's request. TH 101 Access for Klingeihutz Property Mn/DOT ha~ denied the City's request for a right-in/right-out access to TH i 01 for this property. Access to this property will be limited to 86th Street. There is some concern with limiting access to only 86th street considering that the property is nearly 10 acres in size and, depencling upon future development, could generate a fairly si~nificant u'affic volume. Keconstruction of TH 101 North of Lake Susan Drive · Mn/DOT is suggesting that the reconstruction of old TH 101 between Lake Susan Drive and 86t~' Street be addressed as a part of the future reconstruction of TH 101 between TH 212 and Lake Drive (see Item 15 below). Mn/DOT ha~ ~tated that they would be willing to include the reconstruction of this section of TH 101 as a part of the TH 212 project if Mn/DOT JAN, 21. 2004 7:48AM KIMLEY-HORN NO, 688 P, 4 Kimley. Horn and Associates, Inc. Mr. Matt Saam, P.E. January 19, 2004 Page 3 of 5 10, 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. and the City can agree on a scope of work and financing plan before May 1, 2004. City staff and the Council slaould review the need to include th/s work as a part oft. he TI-I 212 project. Lake Susan Drive Access for Curry Prop=try · Mn/DOT has agreed to the City's request; however, the City w-ill incur additional roadway costs for the addition of these accesses. The need for these accesses should be discussed with the property owner since assessments could be used to fund some or all of these additional costs. Excess R.A.L.F. Pdght-of-Way · Mn/DOT w211 dispose of remnant right-of-way after the TH 212 project is complete. Public entities will have first rights to the excess right-of-way, Delete Lyman Boulevard (CSAH 18)/Park and Ride Tra/1 · Mn/DOT has agreed to the City's request. TH 1 O1 Tra/1 Modifications · Mn/DOT has agreed to the City's request. TH 101 Access for Klein, Wilson and Nettesheim Properties · Mn/DOT has agreed to the City's request; howev~, access to the ICIein property will be fight-in/fight-om due to its close proximity to the TH 101/Lyman Boulevard intersection. The proposed design should be acceptable considering that the Klein property will al~o have an access to Lyman Boulevard. TH 101 Reconstruction (Lake Drive to TH 212) Mn/DOT has stated that it is not feasible to include the reconstruct[on of TH 101 between TH 212 and Lake Drive as a part of the TH 212 project. Mn/DOT has programmed the first phase of this project for 2005 wi-rich would include a reali~m~mont of Riley Creek. Funding packages will need to be established for futuro phas~ of the project before they can be programmed. The City will need to continue to work with Mn/DOT on this issue. JAN, 21, 2004 7:49AM KIMLEY-HORN NO. 688 P. 5 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc, Mr. Matt Sa,am, P.E. Januazy 19~ 2004 Page 4 of 5 COST PAK_TICIPATION SUMMAKY REVI~W Mn/DOT has also provided a revised cost participation estimate for Chanhassen's share of the TH 212 project construction. A copy of the updated estimate is attached. A summary of the original and revised estimates is as follows; Improvement ._ Bridge Roadway Turn Lanes Lanes Right-of-Way Trails Construcdon Right-of-Way Signals Subtotal Design Build Costs (25%) Total Estimated Cost Original Revised Estimate Esti_mate $ 426,020 $ 588,560 $ 275,070 $ 391,230 $ 95,220 $ 95,220 $ 54,000 $ 0 $1,171,560 $ 296,800 $ 392,080 $ 0 .$ 310.,000 $ 310,000 $2,723,950 $1,681,810 $ 680,990 $ 420,450 $3,404,940 $2,102,260 The revised cost participaQon estimate detailed above includes a City contribution of $532,500 for the w/dening of the Powers Boulevard bridge. Mn/DOT has stated that they will pay for these costs. The revised total estimated City cost with the Powers Boulevard br/dge costs removed is as follows: Total Estimated Cost Less Powers Boulevard Bridge Costs Revised Total Estimated Cost $2,102,260 $ 532.5_00 $1,569,760 It should be noted that this is an estimate only and that the City's actual cost participation will be based upon actual construction costs. It should also be noted that the estimate provided above does not include the cost of any City smzitary sewer or water main utility improvements that may be installed as a part of the project. The scope and costs for any utility improvements will be identified as a part of a future City feasibility study. The primary changes between the original a.nd revised cost participation estimates are as follows: JAN, 21. 2004 7:49AM KIMLEY-HORN NO, 688 P, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Mr. Matt Saam, P.E. January 19, 2004 Page 5 of 5 City participation in right-of-way acquisition costs for roadway and tra/1 improvements has been eliminated[ 2~ The estimated unit cost for trail construction has been reduced from $6.00/square foot to $1.52/square foot. o Mn/DOT has added a City contribution of approximately $203,200 for half the cost ofthe TH 212 bridge over Bluff Creek and the proposed pedestrian trail. Mn/DOT is assuming 50°,/0 of the costs for the creek crossing aud allocating the remhning 50% to the City for the trail crossing. . Mn/DOT has updated the estimated costs for some of the proposed turn lanes resulting in a change in the estimated turn lane costs. An overview of the layout review and cost participation summary information will be provided for Council as a part of thc presentation at the municipal co~sent public hearing on J'anuary 26, 2004. The public hear/rig presentation w/Il include the following: Topic Overview ofMmficipal Con~ent Process and Introduction of Mn/DOT Overview of TH 212 Project Review of City Design I~,ues and Concerns Review of City Cost Participation Presenter .. Kimley-Hom Mu/DOT Kimley-Hom Kimley-Hom Please let me know if you have any questions or you need any add/tional information. Sincerely, KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ]~oj e/t Manager Copy: File 160511000.2/2.1 January 16, 2004 Mr. Matt Saam, P.E. Acting City Engineer/Director of Public Works City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re~ Responses TH 212 Municipal Consent Review Comments Mn/DOT SP 1017-12 City Project No. 03-09 Dear Mr. Saam: The following is a summary of city of Chanhassen issues with a Department response. The issues revolve around the Mn/DOT municipal consent package for the TH 212 design build project. LAYOUT REVIEW 1. Bluff Creek Pedestrian Trail Underpass · It needs to be determined if the pedestrian trail should be built on the east or west side of Bluff Creek. · The City would prefer that the underpass include two arch structures with an open median area rather than one structure. Response: Two arches create a hazard in the median and drainage can be facilitated by other means. The structure will extend under the eastbound and westbound lanes to allow for the possibility of adding a third lane in the future. The location of the trail within the structure will be determined during the completion of the detail design, as part of the Design Build contact. Mn/DOT will work closely with the city of Chanhassen in determining the final location of the trail within the structure. 2. Fox Property Access · Access needs to be provided to the undeveloped Fox property at the southeast comer of the Powers Boulevard (CSAH 17) and Lyman Boulevard (CSAH 18) intersection or Mn/DOT should acquire this property as a part of the TH 212 project. Response: The Department does not anticipate purchasing the southeast corner of the undeveloped Fox property as described above. Therefore, a means of access will be provided. However, additional discussions with January 16, 2004 Page 2 of 8 Carver County will be necessary in determining the final location of access. o Screening Berms · Concerns have been raised regarding the need for berms to screen existing residential development in the project area. The number and location of these berms needs to be reviewed as the project design is further developed. Response: Mn/DOT has worked closely with the City of Chanhassen staff to identify these locations. These locations have been added to the project and will be constructed as material is available. The size of these berms will be restricted to the availability of material and the current Right of Way limits. . Fox Property Trail Connector · The City is requesting that the geometric layout show a future City trail connection in Mn/DOT right-of-way along the south side of the southeast ramp at the Powers Boulevard (CSAH 17)/TH 212 interchange. A drawing is attached illustrating the location of this trail connection. · Response: The construction of this trail will need to be pursued through Mn/DOT's traditional permitting process. . TH 101 Access for Park and Ride Facility · The City is requesting a right-in/right-out access to TH 101 for the proposed park and ride facility in the northeast comer of the TH 101 and Lyman Boulevard (CSAH 18) intersection. We understand that Southwest Metro Transit has also requested an access to TH 101 at this location. Response: This access is acceptable to Mn/DOT. The location of this access will need to be, at least, 50fi. from the existing right turn taper for TH 101. o TH 101 Access for Curry Property · The City is requesting that a full access be provided to TH 101 for the undeveloped Curry property in the northwest comer of the TH 101 and Lyman Boulevard (CSAH 18) intersection. The access would be at the location of the proposed southeast ramp/loop connection to TH 101. The City understands that a January 16, 2004 Page 3 of 8 connection to TH 101 at this location would require that the connecting roadway be dedicated as a public roadway. This access will require the addition of a right mm lane on southbound TH 101 and a left mm lane for northbound TH 101 at the intersection. Response: This access is acceptable to Mn/DOT. The location of the access shall be located at the intersection of TH 101 and the southern ramp termini. In addition, this access shall be a public through street that connects with Lyman Blvd. This access will require additional turn lanes on TH 10!, a center through lane and turn lane on the exit loop and a possible signal. Additional costs shah be addressed in accordance with the Mn/DOT cost participation policy. o Lyman Boulevard (CSAH 18) Access for Curry and Klein Properties · The City is requesting that the proposed Lyman Boulevard (CSAH 18) access to the Curry and Klein properties in the northwest and southwest comers of the Lyman Boulevard (CSAH 18) and TH 101 intersection be moved 50' further to the east. Response: Relocating this intersection 50fi further to the east is acceptable to Mn/DOT. . TH 101 Access for Klingelhutz Property · The City is requesting that a right-in/fight-out access be provided to TH 101 for the undeveloped Klingelhutz property along the east side of TH 101 south of 86th Street. Response: A right-in/right-out from TH 101 is not acceptable to the Department in this location. . Reconstruction of TH 101 North of Lake Susan Drive · TH 101 is being realigned as a part of the proposed TH 212 project and a portion of old TH 101 north of Lake Susan Drive is proposed to become a City street. Old TH 101 is currently in poor condition and the TH 212 project does not currently include the reconstruction of this portion of old TH 101. The City is requesting that Mn/DOT reconstruct old TH 101 in this area as a part of the tumback of the roadway to the City. January 16, 2004 Page 4 of 8 Response: Mn/DOT anticipates the turnback of the section of TH 1 O1 between Lake Susan Drive and 86th Street to be addressed independently of the TH 212 Design Build project and as part of the TH 1 O! gap project. However, if an agreement can be reached between the city of Chanhassen and Mn/DOT on the scope of work and costs necessary to turnback the section of TH 101 between Lake Susan Drive and 86th Street to the City, before May Ist, 2004, the department would reconsider this position and consider adding it to the TH 212 Design Build project. 10. Lake Susan Drive Access for Curry Property · The City is requesting that access be provided to Lake Susan Drive for the undeveloped Curry properties along the north and south sides of Lake Susan Drive west of TH 101. Response: This is acceptable to Mn/DOT. However, all costs associated with the construction of right-in~right-out intersections, including the extended raised median, will be the responsibility of the city of Chanhassen. 11. Excess R.A.L.F. Right-of-Way · The City is interested in the excess R.A.L.F. right-of-way along the north side of TH 212 between TH 101 and the east City border (Parcel 71 excess acquisition as shown on March 27, 2003 right-of-way map, see attached). Additional discussions are needed to determine the best way to facilitate City ownership of this property. Response: Disposition of remnant Right of Way associated with this project will offered in the following order. 1)Public Entities, 2) Previous Owner, and 3)Open Market. Sale of these properties will not take place until the project is complete. 12. Delete Lyman Boulevard (CSAH 18)/Park and Ride Trail · The City is requesting that the layout be modified to remove the proposed 10' wide trail shown along the north side of Lyman Boulevard (CSAH 18) east of TH 101. Response: This is acceptable to Mn/DOT. 13. TH 101 Trail Modifications · The City is requesting that the layout be modified to move the proposed 10' wide trail along TH 101 south of Lyman January 16, 2004 Page 5 of 8 Boulevard (CSAH 18) from the west side of the roadway to the east side of the roadway. Response: This is acceptable to Mn/DOT. 14. TH 101 Access for Klein, Wilson and Nettesheim Properties The City is requesting that the layout be modified to show access locations for the Klein and Wilson properties along the west side of TH 101 south of Lyman Boulevard (CSAH 18) and to the Nettesheim property along the east side of TH 101 south of Lyman Boulevard (CSAH 18). Response: This is acceptable to Mn/DOZ Access the Klien property along the west side of TH 101 will be restricted to a right-in/right-out. Access to the Wilson and Nettesheim properties will be full access. 15. TH 101 Reconstruction (Lake Drive to TH 212) TH 101 from TH 5 to Lake Drive is currently a 4-lane section. TH 101 is also proposed to be reconstructed to a 4-lane section as a part of the TH 212 project. The remaining 0.89 mile section of TH 101 between Lake Drive and TH 212 is currently a 2-lane section that needs to be upgraded to a 4-lane design. Mn/DOT has stated that this section of TH 101 is outside of the scope of the TH 212 project. If this section of TH 101 can't be included in the TH 212 project, the City would like to have an understanding from Mn/DOT on the future process/schedule for the reconstruction of this section of TH 101. Response: The addition of this segment of roadway to the New TH212 project is not a feasible option. The Department has programmed stage one of this project consisting ora stream realignment. This is scheduled to be completed during the Summer of 2005. The Department will continue to work with the city of Chanhassen to pursuefundingpackages to complete stage 2 of the TH 101 gap project. Funding packages will most likely include state and local participation. COST PARTICIPATION SUMMARY REVIEW Powers Boulevard Bridge · The cost summary includes a Chanhassen contribution of approximately $532,500 for the widening of the Powers Boulevard (CSAH 17) bridge. The City was of the January 16, 2004 Page 6 of 8 understanding that Mn/DOT would pay the cost for the bridge widening based upon a November 25, 2003 letter from Mn/DOT to the City (see attached). Response: The November 25th, 2003 letter addressed items related to the recent A UAR completed by the city of Chanhassen. The Department will pay for bridge costs justified by the 20 year forecast. The City of Chanhassen will be responsible for costs of roadway approaches exceeding the 2007 volumes. Therefore, the $532,500 for bridge costs at Powers Blvd will become the responsible of Mn/DOZ The roadway approach costs required as a result of the A UAR will be the responsibility of the City of Chanhassen. . County Roadway Costs The cost summary includes a Chanhassen contribution of approximately $788,500 for turn lane, roadway widening, traffic signal, and/or right-of-way costs at Pioneer Trail (CSAH 14), Powers Boulevard (CSAH 17), and Lyman Boulevard (CSAH 18). All of these roadways are under Carver County jurisdiction. Discussions should be initiated with Carver County regarding their participation in these costs based upon the current County cost participation policy. · Additional information is needed from Mn/DOT to review the proposed cost splits for the traffic signal installation along Powers Boulevard (CSAH 17) at the northeast ramp/loop and southeast ramp/loop intersections. · The cost participation summary includes Chanhassen costs to construct a right-turn lane on westbound Lyman Boulevard (CSAH 18) at Lake Susan Drive. Clarification is needed from Mn/DOT on why this is included as a Chanhassen cost when it is a turn lane to serve an existing development. Response: The signals and additional roadway width along Powers Blvd was not originally planned in the 212 Design Build project. The Signals additional roadway width became necessary as a result of the A UAR. Therefore the Department can directly accredit the increase in scope to the city of Chanhassen. Signals were not planned at the north or south ramp and loop termini prior to the A UAR impacts being incorporated into the project scope. Therefore, local costs associated with the signals and additional roadway width has been assigned to the City of Chanhassen. The signal costs associated with the Powers Blvd ramp and loop termini intersections are again assigned to the city of Chanhassen as a result of January 16, 2004 Page 7 of 8 the recently completed A UAR. Prior to the A UAR, signals were not required at the northern and southern ramp termini. The A UAR required signalized intersections in both locations and the City was assigned the local share of these signal systems (50% of southern intersection, 60%for northern intersection). Discussion regarding the Carver County cost participation policy should be between the city of Chanhassen and Carver County. o Trail Costs · The cost summary includes a Chanhassen contribution of approximately $1,549,600 for trail costs along Pioneer Trail (CSAH 14), Powers Boulevard (CSAH 17), and Lyman Boulevard (CSAH 18). These estimated trail costs include both construction and right-of-way acquisition costs. Carver County cost participation policy does not include participation in sidewalk/trail costs; however, portions of these trail segments may have some benefit to the overall County trail plan. Discussions should be initiated with Carver County regarding their participation in some of these trail costs. · The cost summary includes a Chanhassen contribution of approximately $105,000 for trail construction within Mn/DOT right-of-way along the north side of TH 212 between Powers Boulevard (CSAH 17) and TH 101. Mn/DOT cost participation policy allows Mn/DOT participation in trails constructed within trunk highway fight-of-way. Discussions should be initiated with Mn/DOT regarding their possible participation in these trail costs. Response: The unit cost per square foot has been modified. Therefore trail costs for the City of Chanhassen have been reduced. At this time, the costs associated with trails requested by the city of Chanhassen will remain the responsibility of the city of Chanhassen in accordance with the Mn/DOT cost participation policy. If the city of Chanhassen would like a meeting between Mn/DOT, Carver County and the City to discuss this further the Department is willing to facilitate such a meeting. The trail located within Mn/DOT Right of Way between Powers Blvd and TH 1 O1 will remain the responsibility of the City of Chanhassen as defined within the Mn/DOT cost participation policy. 4. Right-of-Way Costs January 16, 2004 Page 8 of 8 The cost participation summary includes fight-of-way acquisition costs for turn lanes and trails at numerous locations. In a majority of these locations, Mn/DOT's right-of-way acquisition was not changed as a result of the construction of the turn lanes or trails. Clarification is needed t~om Mn/DOT on why these right-of-way costs have been included as Chanhassen costs. Response: The Department has decided not to charge the Cities or Counties for costs associated with Right of ~/ay. Please contact me at (651) 582-1340 if you have questions concerning these comments. I look forward to working with you and your staff through the development of the TH 212 Design Build documents to ensure that this project is a success. Sincerely, Jon Chiglo Minnesota Department of Transportation Highway 212 Design Build Project Manager ML WB w Bus Shoulders Pioneer TralI(CSAH 14) Existing Pioneer Trail Bridge Powers Boulevard(CSAH 17} Existing(north) Powers Boulevard Bridge Lyman Road(CSAH 18) existing Lyman Road Bridge TH 101 Existing TH 101 Brl'dge LakeSusan Drive Bluff Creek REad Existing TOTALS GRAND TOTAL Revtelon Date width sq ff Brld~e $/eq, ft. 12 2.520 129 Tra~l crossing t~nderpase 50% 14 5012 $8~.00 $162,540.00 $426,020.00 $588,660.00 ~rnlane Sta T~al Length 50+00(rt), 67+00(rlJ 600 6 88+00(It), 2198 12 26+00(rt),, 1200 6 4o+oo(rt,lt) 600 12 Width $ 93100 $31,738.84 $232,538.41 $83,477.27 $63,477.27 $391,231.59 Roadway L~ne~ (width by lenglh) Sta to Sta Length Width Depth EB ramp & WB ranp 300 $1,.681,802.70 DB COSTS +26% $2,102,253.38 $ COST 95100 $95,215.91 $95,215.91 CHANHASSEN Right of Way $ ($2.2.5/sq ft) 2,25 $0,00 Sta to Sta 11 ~5.{.O01o 1149-~0~ 39+001o65-H30 73~501o 123+00 26.tO0 to 46+00 12~.~001o 19+00 13~001o39.~50 Length 1400 4242 9184 1600 700 2400 Trails Width lO $ Cost ($1.52 per Sq ft, 80000per mile) 5.8 $21,280.00 $64,478.40 $139,$96.80 $24,320.00 $10,640.00 '36480 $296,795.20 Right of Way $ Cost (2.25 per Sq Ft) 2.25 $0.00 STA 111+00 (3/5), 97+00 48-{-~0 (1/4) 19+0oi(1/5) Signals Qty 1 1/lO 1/4 $ ($2oo,ooo per signal) 200000 ,$220,000.00 ~7~50,000,00 $40,000.00 $310,000,00 Sta Drainage Cost iRIght of WaW $ Cost (S2.2~ per Sq Ft) 2.25