Loading...
1d. Final Plat Ersbo Addition I CITYOF id.. 111 I 1 CHANHASSEN 1 690 COULTER DRIVE• P.O. BOX 147• CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 1 (612) 937-1900 • FAX(612) 937-5739 IMEMORANDUM 1 TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager I I FROM: Paul Krauss, Planning Director DATE: March 20, 1990 1 ISUBJ: Requested Revisions to the Approved Final Plat of Ersbo 2nd Addition 1 1 PROPOSAL/SUMMARY I On December 18th of last year, the City Council approved the final 1 plat for the Ersbo 2nd Addition.,.. The plat resulted in the creation of 6 single family lots accessed by a new public cul-de-sac. The new street was to be called Arlington Court South and it was to 1 I align with Arlington Court intersection of Lake Lucy Road. This plat itself was a replat of an earlier subdivision that had been _ approved and filed. but not developed. The original plat would have 1 I resulted in the creation of :4 new lots. f .. The Ersbo 2nd Addition has not yet been filed with the County. While staking the new property corners, the applicant's surveyor 1 I became aware of a problem. Apparently, they relied on an underlying survey and based their work. on this document. As a result of an error somewhere in this process, Arlington Court South I I did not align with Arlington Court North as required by a condition of approval but was approximately 30 foot off center. Staff felt that this was an unacceptable situation and would be detrimental to 1 I traffic safety as well as being inconsistent with the original approval. Therefore, the applicant's surveyor has redrafted the final plat of the,Ersbo 2nd Addition to resolve this problem. 1 The revised plat is in most respects quit similar to the one that was approved last year. It also results in the creation of 6 lots accessed by Arlington Court South which is now aligned with I I Arlington Court North, as was the original intent. In several respects, the current plat has advantages over the original one in that it provides larger lots then had originally been the case. On 1 I the earlier plat, access to Lot 7 was via a 30 foot wide neck to Lake Lucy Road. On the current plat that neck has been eliminated. The lot and driveway serving Lot 7 will be accommodated in an easement. In addition, there are only two lots that oriented west 1 1 I I I Mr. Don Ashworth March 20, 1990 II Page 2 I atowards the protected wetland on the current plat versus the 3 on the original proposal. This would have the effect of reducing visual impact on the wetland. II IFrom a technical standpoint, the current proposal raises no new issues. Utility services will be provided as previously I illustrated and drainage considerations will be handled in an appropriate manner. As before, we do not anticipate there being any impacts on the protected wetland and note that development on II II the current proposal is getting no closer to the wetland then had originally been approved. There are no new variances resulting from the current proposal. However, the one variance that had been approved for the previous plat is being modified with this I II proposal. Originally, Lot 7 was served by a 30 foot wide neck to Lake Lucy Road. As indicated above this will be eliminated with access being provided by a permanently recorded easement. This lot II I was originally given a variance to have 30 feet of frontage on Lake Lucy Road. Under the current scenario, the lot will have no frontage on a public right-of-way. Staff continues to support the variance believing that this is only a technical change. The lot I II will continue to be accessed by the same driveway it always has and from an appearance standpoint nothing will change. The easement will be permanently recorded and will provide legitimate access to 1 Lot 7. We also note that access, as proposed herein, is consistent with the draft private driveway ordinance that is currently being reviewed by the City Council. I II COMPLIANCE WITH ORDINANCE - RSF DISTRICT Lot Lot Lot Home Area Width Depth Setback II 1 Ordinance 15,000 90' 125' 30' front/rear 10' sides I 1 Lot 1 16,056 105' 152' N/A Lot 2 16,780 138' 127' N/A ILot 3 16,524 90' 130' N/A ILot 4 15,156 100' 137' N/A Lot 5 23,916 110' 140' N/A I IILot 6 21,780 165' 132' N/A Lot 7 80,486 0 (Variance) 65' front 11 1 80' east 100' west 130' rear II I I 11 11 . L I M • i r. Don Ashworth I March 20, 1990 Page 3 I Variances Required II V1 - Variance to allow 0' frontage on Lot 7 which is to be served II by a permanently recorded driveway easement. I CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION II IStaff recommends the City Council adopt the following motion: The City Council approves the final plat for Ersbo 2nd Addition I #87-36 as shown on the plat dated "March 5, 1990", with a variance Ito allow 0' frontage on public right-of-way for Lot 7, subject to the following conditions: U Ii. Provide final detailed plans of the streets and utility improvements for approval by the City Engineer. Review as II necessary to accommodate revised final plat. 1 2. Provide final erosion control plans acceptable to staff. Type III erosion control will be required along the western I perimeter of the site adjacent to the wetland. Prior to the I initiation of grading, staff will walk the stite with the developer to mark out trees designated for preservation. Staff will modify the plans as required to improve tree II I preservation efforts. Drainage swales are to be provided around each of the homes. The berm located in the Lake Lucy I Road right-of-way is to be relocated onto Lot 1, Block 1. I 3. Provide final drainage plans for approval by city staff. Watershed District approval is required. I I 4. Compliance with the conditions of the Wetland Alteration Permit #88-7. 1 I 5. At such time as a new public street is provided to the south of Lake Lucy Road, the private driveway currently serving the existing home shall be removed and the driveway shall access II to the south off the new public street. I6. Stake off the trees to be saved at the dripline for approval by staff prior to grading the site. I7. All trees 10' or more in caliper that are lost need to be replaced by new trees according to plans approved by staff. II I The applicant should seek to establish a buffer along Lake Lucy Road. Record a permanent access easement over the existing driveway over Lots 5 and 6 in favor of Lot 7. II II II I ' Mr. Don Ashworth March 20, 1990 Page 4 8. A 20 foot wide drainage and utility easement is required ' across Lot 3 for the extension of watermain to the southeast corner of Lot 3. 9. The applicant shall enter into a development contract with the City and provide the City with the necessary financial sureties to guarantee the proper installation of these improvements prior to commencement of any construction or ' grading. 10. Lots 1 and 6 shall not be permitted to gain access from Lake ' Lucy Road. 11. File a permanent 20 foot cross access easement over the ' existing driveway to Lot 7. " ATTACHMENTS 1. Previous staff report with City Council minutes. , ' 2. Memo from Sr. Engineering Technician. 3. Final plat dated March 5, 1990. I 1 r . ) 3a. 44 I I CITYOF . cHANBAssEN 3 n ,SL 1 I w - . _ 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147• CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 --,:_i_ (612)937-1900 • FAX(612) 937-5739 I Action by City Administrator MEMORANDUM I Endorsed • 19 " ITO: Don Ashworth, City Manager Modified FROM: Jo Ann Olsen, Senior Planner ?I,) Rejected /2 �/� /Ff I Date Submitted to Commission DATE: December 11, 1989 SUBJ: Final Plat for Ersbo Addition Date suF-=.'ted to Council II I /2/4rleS On November 20, 1989, the City Council approved the preliminary II II plat for the Ersbo First Addition as shown on the plat dated October 11, 1989 with a variance to allow a 30 foot lot width on Lot 1, Block 2, subject to the fallowing conditions: II 1 1. Provide final detailed plans of the streets and utility improvements. I I2. Lots I and 6 , Block 1 are- to gain access solely by driveway to Eagle Circle. Access:to LakeLucy Road is prohibited. A notice of this limitation should `' e placed in shared title of II I both lots. 3. Provide final erosion control plant acceptable to staff. I Type III erosion control will be required along the western 1 perimeter of the ,site adjacent to the wetland. Prior to the initiation of grading, staff will walk the site with the II developer to mark out trees designated for preservation. I Staff will modify the plans, as required to improve tree pre- servationefforts. '--Drainage-swales are to be provided around II each of the .homes. it he berm.located-;in the ;Lake ,Lucy Road right-Of-,way is to be relocated onto Lot•1",' 'Blockj. 4. Provide final drainage--plans for approvaly ;#4,V.City staff. Watershed District approva1, is required.T i5. Easements to be provided: ; II II a. Right-of-way for Eagle Cirle. b. Request the City Council vacate right-of-way for existing streets and easements approved under the original plat. II Utility easements are required for the proposed watermain IC. and sanitary sewer pipes on Lot 6, Block 1; Lot 1, Block 2; and based upon final engineering design may be II required over an adjacent parcel to the west. 11 II Mr. Don Ashworth II II - December 11, 1989 Page 2 d. Drainage and utility easements are required over the pond I and storm sewer pipes on Lot 6, Block 1; Lot 1, Block 2; and based upon final engineering design may be required II II over an adjacent parcel to the west. e. Standard utility easements around the perimeter of each lot. II II6. Enter into a development contract with the City. II7. Compliance with the conditions of the Wetland Alteration 11 Permit #88-7. 8. Change the street name to Arlington Court. I I9 . At such time as a new public street is provided to teh south of Lake Lucy Road, the private driveway currently serving the I I existing home shall be removed and the driveway shall access to the south off the new public street. 10. Stake off the trees to be saved at the dripline. II 11 11. All trees 10" or more in caliper need to be replaced. I The final plat is consistent with the approved preliminary plat. Conditions #5 a. , b. , and e. , and #8. have been met. Conditions II #1, 3 , 4 , and 6 are in the process of being provided for staff II IIreview and Conditions #2 is part of the development contract. CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION II 1 Staff recommends the City Council adopt the following motion: "The City Council approves the final plat for Ersbo First Addition I I #87-36 as shown on the plat dated December 5, 1989, subject to the following conditions: II 1. Provide final detailed plans of the streets and utility I improvements for approval by the City Engineer. 2. Provide final erosion control plans acceptable to staff. I II Type III erosion control will be required along the western perimeter of the site adjacent to the wetland. Prior to the initiation of grading, staff will walk the site with the I II developer to mark out trees designated for preservation. Staff will modify the plans as required to improve tree pre- servation efforts. Drainage swales are to be provided around I each of the homes. The berm located in the Lake Lucy Road right-of-way is to be relocated onto Lot 1, Block 1. 3. Provide final drainage plans for approval by City staff. II IIWatershed District approval is required. 1 II 7 R t ) IL `• Mr. Don Ashworth December 11, 1989 1 Page 3 1 4. Compliance with the conditions of the Wetland Alteration II IIPermit #88-7. 5. At such time as a new public street is provided to the south I of Lake Lucy Road, the private driveway currently serving the I existing home shall be removed and the driveway shall access to the south off the new public street. I II6. Stake off the trees to be saved at the dripline. 7. All trees 10" or more in caliper need to be replaced. I I 8. A 20-foot wide drainage and utility easement is required across the easterly 20 feet of Lot 1, Block 1 and also II between Lots 2 and 3, Block 1. II9. The drainage and utility easement located on Lot 6, Block 1 should be extended westerly to the west line of Lot 7, Block Ii. This easement is necessary for an outlet pipe from the sediment pond to the wetland lying west of the plat (see I attached) . II 10. The applicant shall enter into a development contract with the City and provide the City with the necessary financial 1 sureties to guarantee the proper installation of these I improvements prior to commencement of any construction or grading." I 1 VACATION An underlying plat with streets and utility easements for the ori- ginal Ersbo addition has been recorded with Carver County. The II applicant has requested approval for vacation of existing ease- ments and street right-of-ways. The proposed plat, Ersbo First II Addition provides necessary street right-of-ways and utility IIeasements. CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION I IIStaff recommends the City Council adopt the following motion: The City Council approves Vacation Request #89-12 to vacate II I street right-of-ways and utility easements as plat of Ersbo Addition." I IIATTACHMENTS 1. City Council minutes dated November 20, 1989. II 2. Memo from Engineering Department dated December 12, 1989. I3. Final plat dated December 5, 1989. II II T 4 ' city Council Meeting /bvember 20, 1989 ) II .. .. I II Councilman Johnson: The economic consideration would come from some future, ' Illfuture Council. Roman Roos: I understand but as long as that's part of it. II Councilman Johnson: Well yeah. There's always the reasonableness has to be II II brought into it. %bat we're saying is that this is the plan at this time. If in the future it's going to cost you $100,000.00 to do it, obviously they're not going to make you do it. No reasonable Council would and I would assume this town's only going to elect reasonable Councils. II ICary Warren: Maintenance cost savings could equal the cost of a new road over several years too. That's a long driveway. II IRaman Roos: But again, I just wanted to rake that comment ent to your motion. I II understand what you're saying Jay. II Councilman Johnson moved, Councilman Hoyt seconded to rove Subdivision #87-36 6 as presented on the plat stamped "Received October 11,x19 7 1989" with a variance to I I allow a 30 foot lot width on Lot 1, Block 2, subject to the following conditions: r---1. Provide final detailed plans of the streets and utility improvements. II 2. Lots 1 and 6, Block 1 are to gain access solely by driveway to Eagle Circle. r Access to Lake Lucy Road is prohibited. A notice of this limitation should II' be placed in shared title of both lots. 3. Provide final erosion control plans acceptable to staff. Type III erosion I I control will be required along the western perimeter of the site adjacent to the wetland. Prior to the initiation of grading, staff will walk the site with the developer to mark out trees designated for preservation. Staff II will modify the plans as required to I p equ improve tree preservation efforts. Drainage swales are to be provided around each of the homes. The berm located in the Lake Lucy Road right-of-way is to be relocated onto Lot 1, Block 1. - II 4. Provide final drainage plans for approval by City Staff. Watershed District approval is required. II I5. Easements to be provided: a. Right-of-may for Eagle Circle. II b. Request the City Council vacate right-of-way for existing streets and easements approved under the original plat. I IC. Utility easeme is are required for the proposed watermain and sanitary i sewer pipes on Lot 6, Block 1; Lot 1, Block 2; and based upon final II 111 engineering design may be required over an adjacent parcel to the west. d. Drainage and utility easements are required over the pond and storm sewer pipes on Lot 6, Block 1; Lot 1, Block 2; and based upon final II 1 51 Lim.................mm............m........... 1•1 • Ginty ammcil Meeting - No _�r 26, 1989 ) II engineering design may be required over an adjacent parcel to the west. e. Standard utility easements around the perimeter of each lot. 6. Enter into a development contract with the City. 7. Compliance with the conditions of Wetland Alteration Permit #88-7. 1 8. Charge the street name to Arlington Court. 4 1 9. At such time as a new public street is provided to the south of Lake Lucy Road, the private driveway currently serving the existing home shall be removed and the driveway shall access to the south off the new public street. II 10. Stake off the trees to be saved at the dripline. • 11. All trees 10" or more in caliper need to be replaced. All voted in favor and the motion carried. Councilman Johnson: I will move the wetland alteration permit. IICouncilman Boyt: I will second that. I think we should add a skimmer. They talked about a skimmer. They pulled the skimmer out. Councilman Johnson: my don't we have a skimmer? I missed the skimmer. III Roman Roos: We've got a sedimentation pond. A skimmer's cost is not that great 11 but that's really the purpose for a sedimentation pond before it outlets into the Watershed. Councilman Boyt: And that's what the skimmer does isn't it? It ensures that I the sedimentation pond is doing it's job. Roman Roos: Not necessarily. If the skimmer's used on a main outflow into an watershed type situation, all we did was put a sedimentation pond in it's place. II It was a recommendation of Planning Crrmisssion if I recall Paul, but again knowing what they do and how they function and I guess engineering, Gary can address that issue. That skimmer's really not going to perform any real I function as it sets as we've got it laid out on a drainage situation. Gary? Gary Warren: I don't know all the details of a skimmer. I would suggest that II when plans and specs come back, we will definitely be looking at along with the Watershed District to have the appropriate, whether it's a skimmer or not. TO have the appropriate facility put in. - - - I Councilman Boyt: The City has put that in several of it's holding ponds. Gary Warren: And I've been on record, I don't like the wood skimmers because they're going to be, not too far in the distance we're going to have a lot of repairs and maintenance on them but I'd say, the plans and specs phase would be appropriate to work out that detail. I 52 1 r i City Council Meeting bvember 20, 1989 ) II ft II ill' Councilman Johnson: Which Watershed District has this? IIGary Warren: Their boundaries, -we just got, this actually flows, that wetland I flows up ultimately to Christmas Lake so that's Minnehaha Creek but the boundary from what Mr. Quanbeck has told me, doesn't necessarily follow. My gut reaction is that it's Minnehaha but it could be in Riley-Purgatory. I ICouncilman Johnson: So I have same review of the skimmer. IIGary Warren: You may have same influence. I Councilman Johnson moved, Councilman Bout seconded to approve Wetland Alteration I 1 Permit Request #88-7 as presented on the plat stamped "Received October 11, 1989", subject to the following conditions: II1. Acquisition of a drainage easement fran the adjacent property owner. I 2. Approval of a permit from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. II 1 3. Creation of a storm water retention pond in the northwest corner of Lot 6, Block 1. II4. Installation of Type III erosion control between the development and the Class A wetland. 5. Compliance with conditions of the Preliminary Plat #87-36. II All voted in favor and the motion carried. II II CONSIDER PLUMBING PERMIT FEE REVISION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A PIPING FEE. I Councilman Johnson: Can I ask a question? Why aren't we doing this with our normal fee review that we do every January? II I Don Ashworth: This is a new fee schedule. Jim is present. Do you want to go through it Jim? II Councilman Johnson: It seers that that would be a logical time to implement a II II • new fee when we review all our fees. Maybe not. Jim Chaffee: I didn't quite hear your question or what the answer was. This is II 1 a new fee that we're asking be implemented. One is a new fee and another is a revision of the plumbing fee. We've not revised the plumbing fee structure for quite a while. Our plumbing inspector took a look at this several months ago. II 1 Asked if they could come up with a schedule that would be conducive more to what they do and also more in like with what the other cities in our surrounding areas are doing. They have done that and after considerable amount of research, they have revised the plumbing permit fee schedule to reflect more of what we do II and they've also asked that we implement a gas piping fee schedule which we've never had in the City of Chanhassen. We didn't even look at this until we started doing our mechanical inspections ourselves. I think it's a needed area. II II t 53 1 - . ( _ . I i CITYOF 1 1 , 4 . ... . . CHANHASSEN i . .:I _ 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147• CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 • FAX(612) 937-5739 1 IMEMORANDUM TO: Jo Ann Olsen, Senior Planner II 1 FROM: Dave Hempel, Sr. Engineering Technician I I DATE: December 12, 1989 SUBJ: Final Plat Review for Ersbo 1st Addition I File No. 89-17 Land Use Review 1 Upon review of the final plat stamped December 5, 1989, prepared 1 by Demars-Gabriel Land Surveyors, Inc. , I find the plat accep- table with the following conditions or modifications. i 1. A 20-foot wide drainage and utility easement is required 1 across the easterly 20 feet ofg,Lot 1, Block 1 and also bet- ween Lots 2 and 3, Block 1. II 1 2. The drainage and utility easement located on Lot 6, Block 1 should be extended westerly to the west line of Lot 7, Block 1. This easement is necessary for an outlet pipe from the II sediment pond to the wetland lying west of the plat (see attached) . .' 3. The applicant shall enter into a development contract with 1 the City and provide the City with the necessary financial sureties to guarantee the proper installation of these I improvements prior to commencement of any construction or IIgrading F r . II Attachment: Easement Location Detail. . Is. ,;a a I -•gym., -- z. " - c: Gary Warren, City Engineer• , =f 1 I I I I I I i • t , 1 r1 0 ' . _ . ' - L .l E�n P .^ \ —1 r' ^ ' = rJ CJ I ... IL, -'. ,A) _ _4 l— -1 K•�. L._ III- \ ■ \ 1 $-: is K I ' So 4/M //'7 'rF L.4.4-'E Z v C Y RC.a 3D5. 77 Eosf� . - - 30.00 ' r `��/37 92 O A% ,J - ' txfE�I . Ur.e Zr,' i. _ ___,L11.4," 4,71, • �---- — 7/-755- 1-,- QO .P�rDD7� x_55.0 y �itMivM.E 1i�'st�'E^' r F,�e r,, ' I,O y �'p-/� prom goof' 1 0 1(0�1 L.OT 6 AzRoSS 'or 7 1 - I , '/,1 of/b/5/cvstrn"�> N ,4 ti I j.l. �s5,1;tt �, N roGj i�v 1 c East fi . .. „ o i � Z n , I r'' `-, ■ '. ^ o i : ' ti I L 1 IN I IL� '— —,378/_"' J ` ��1�— n I -- I _ :N i t� �. L___-::\ // 441 i al 1— ; Eosf � _ ; _iZ _4 I I NI �1- J — , �_ 5 �I ic' Fosr I oI I �-- - - - - - - - =- -= ' a \la- I :�,-t;;µ i : .. `\V t '1 ,.:. '" 1'_�. kt}- , ,•y l I . � ., _ 00 4)/ � ° ei°ti.• Vic;. '9 - -A -- - I tea ' .'y � � A w �ic, N I 0 I :�_ ..- ) V: * , 2 C'I I ' y' ‘rit I n� 1 1--lam .. �p`� ` "I�'.so , ec•0 \it ' I 1 t sp.. 6 ' • • [n \ °`II , � I � II 'Li _ �il �� � 'S 1 r i 1ts\ .c..1" .- 4 �� �0 1 i I L _iiB 34 _ — /s6 (.75 - X I I ; 3'4. g� �c5f - 1 I I I I I �I I 1 Ii O _ 1•- F i. DATE: Nov. 1, 1989 ; 1TY OF —� IL C.C. DATE: Nov. 27, 1989 CUANHAE A •� � CASE NO: 87-36 SUB WAP II �.. _ Prepared - STAFF REPORT 1 1 PROPOSAL: Preliminary Plat to Subdivide 5.06 Acres into 7 Single Family Lots II ti Wetland Alteration Permit for Development Within 200 Feet of a Class A Wetland Q 1 Q LOCATION: 1211 Lake Lucy Road 1 a APPLICANT: Richard Ersbo William Engelhardt Associates Q 1211 Lake Lucy Road 1107 Hazeltine Blvd, Suite 48 ' Chanhassen, MN 55317 Chaska, MN 55318 II PRESENT ZONING: RSF, Residential Single Family Y 1 ACREAGE: 5.06 (gross) acres 4.42 (net) acres It DENSITY: 1.38 lots per acre (net) by 'Adminbtrata 1 ADJACENT ZONING Sidorse Modifier AND LAND USE: N- RSF; single family Re*tett IDirt. //-/S- S- RR; vacant bete Submitted to Commies( ' 1 tic II kt E- RSF; single family , tote Submitted to Council W- RR; Class A wetland 1 I WATER c:1 AND SEWER: Sewer and water is available to the site. imm 1 PHYSICAL CHARAC. : The site contains one single family I residence with a swimming pool and a steep slope from the middle of the site towards 1 Lake Lucy Road. II 2000 LAND USE PLAN: Low Density Residential 1 1 1 • ...u\amirierTmli"::....spist r. 24ai•I 4121-- � R1MONtGK 0 �\ • , lion i, illiCtra 404. $ 1111166. IN tiik /44,„lava iiik • s c2.- kr Van. no -1•421ri• III .......116111111T111W4 a et V ■rte - �t . • 9 fli 11 la I • i ik 1111 (auk , nig gr,-,,... . liti.,.*,,,- . , illi`` 1 t �l ��� ■■ice_ v- v,- E.t ` W. •1 TM STREET L t• rm.! ' mil imili M ,s .% "-- ) W- Prigrar P Vitt( ev• - 4170w fl - st ' . • c 1111.... on °Riv .-1•03••Viii Niiir-I ,' 4i 411111 II II %/Alt Illig b a,us.04 114 A w-7-A! -"11 LAKE LUCY B le �,�� so wi.r�. t- ..76% Nc..� R� �� IN �: 4r.:-.., = :r111ti11111N1� �,: ■� f1 ■ :••i.,4,. .= 1" IN i li. ...,_J,; Iii►� ,.. .... .�� 1 i r • ■ ( A;EANN ' _._ • , D \, . RD . .. . / IL ) 0 • • R I 1111 RR - .. . R 1 Nvf; R12 �, 1 • R12 ■ ■ • - = •_ "• =0U EVAR• ,.. .._K .• . - Pa BG -r II. - u - ) 11* Ersbo Subdivision/WAP November 1, 1989 Page 2 II IIBACKGROUND On June 13, 1988, the City Council approved the preliminary plat II II for Ersbo Addition (Attachments #1 and #2) . The lot con- figuration of the 1988 approved plan contained 4 new single II family lots with a fifth lot containing the existing single I family residence. The site was serviced by a 50 foot wide right- of-way from Lake Lucy Road along the northern half of the pro- perty on the western edge of the site. A full street standard cul-de-sac serviced the four new lots and a 50 foot easement I south of the dedicated 50 foot right-of-way serviced the existing single family residence. The preliminary plat also provided a 50 II foot easement located east of the cul-de-sac which could serve as I a future connection to the property to the east. The approved plat was filed with Carver County and the applicant was in the II process of having the property developed. IPROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicant has submitted a revised preliminary plat for City II II approval. According to the applicant, he is requesting approval of a new plat because the cost to make the necessary improvements II to the previously approved plat was such that he could not afford Ito develop the property. It should also be noted that the origi- nal plan would have created only 4 new homesites while the II current plat will create 6. I The new plat proposes to serve the site with a 300 ft. long cul- de-sac off of Lake Lucy Road directly across from existing II Arlington Court (Curry Farms) . The cul-de-sac will service six II new single family lots. The existing single family residence will be located on the seventh lot and serviced by the existing II bituminous driveway along the westerly edge of the property. All II of the lots meet the minimum requirements for lot area, depth and width, except for Lot 1, Block 2, which contains the existing II single family residence. Lot 1, Block 2 is a flag lot with only 30 feet of street frontage containing the existing bituminous I driveway. Therefore, a variance to the lot width requirement of 90 feet is required for Lot 1, Block 2. The original plat II approved a substandard lot width of 50 feet for the lot with the II existing house. A variance was not required although the lot really had only 50 ft. of paved frontage, the undeveloped II right-of-way ran parallel to the lot. Thus it was technically in compliance with City standards. I Staff supports the variance and revised plat for several reasons. II The original approved plat runs the street right-of-way along the I western edge of the site. A careful review of currently available information indicates that this road could not be II constructed without significantly impacting an adjacent wetland I and requiring the removal of a forested bluff line. The approved alignment also would not have served many potential homesites since the wetland would be on one side and the bluff line on the II other. Staff has also reviewed overall access to surrounding II II Ersbo Subdivision/WAP I 1 November 1, 1989 Page 3 IIproperties and concluded that the original roadway configuration did not adequately provide service for those lots and, in fact, I II raised a number of additional problems that are detailed in the report. Finally, we note that the current layout is not substantively different than the reality of the original, II II approved plan. When we look further at Lot 1, Block 2 we conclude that there is not much opportunity for further sub- divisions that would result in additional homes using the driveway to access Lake Lucy Road. This is due to the location II Iof the existing home and swimming pool and prevailing grades. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposal at the November 1, I II 1989. Most of the discussion was focused on access issues. The discussion focused on means to serve Lot 1, Block 2, the large lot containing the existing home. There was some desire to see the need for two curb cuts for the plat eliminated. This would II I be accomplished by somehow relocating the driveway to enter onto Eagle Circle cul-de-sac rather then directly onto Lake Lucy Road. Staff indicated that this may be possible but is made difficult II I due to prevailing grades in the area. Further discussion covered the potential of Lot 1, Block 2, which contains 92,394 square feet, to be further subdivided and if subdivision were to occur, II 1 how could access be provided? Staff indicated that subdivision potential is limited by the location of the existing home, swimming pool and existing grades. Upon further investigation, we found that there is a potential for serving the lot with a new I II street running along the southern property line. An illustration of this alignment is attached to this report. II The Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend approval I of the Wetland Alteration Permit. They added a 5th condition that requires compliance with conditions of the associated sub- I division approval. They recommended approval of the subdivision on a 3 to 2 vote subject to staff's recommendations. Since the Planning Commission meeting, the developer has revised II the plat to respond to several of the conditions relating to revised engineering design standards for utilities, drainage and the street. I In conclusion, the plat is generally well designed and is in compliance with virtually all applicable standards. It is essen- tially a modification of an approved plat with the primary change II II being revised access that in our opinion results in a more reasonable roadway pattern on this lot and for surrounding par- cels. Since the plat is located within 200 ft. of a Class A I II wetland, an alteration permit is required. We note that the current plat has significantly less potential for impacting the adjacent wetland. Staff is recommending that the plat and I I wetland alteration permit be approved with the variance to allow 30 feet of lot front for Lot 1, Block 2, subject to appropriate conditions. II Ersbo Subdivision/WAP November 1, 1989 II . Page 4 II Access IIThe original plan illustrated a new public street called Arlington Avenue running south from Lake Lucy Road over the II II western 50 ft. of the site. The right-of-way would have only been improved over approximately the northern 160 feet whereupon II it would turn east and end in a cul-de-sac that would serve the four new home sites that were then being proposed. Additional I right-of-way was reserved to extend the cul-de-sac to the east to serve an adjacent property. Arlington Avenue could theoretically II be extended south at some point in the future to accommodate I additional lots. The current plat is considerably different in that the Arlington Avenue right-of-way would be vacated and a new 111 cul-de-sac referred to as Eagle Circle would run south from Lake II Lucy Road and would only serve the six new home sites that would result from the current plat. The existing home would continue II to utilize a driveway to Lake Lucy Road that is contained in a 30 ft. wide "neck". Staff worked with the developer to insure that 1 the Eagle Circle right-of-way is directly in line with the existing Arlington Court right-of-way to provide for a safe four- II way intersection. IStaff supports the new access positions for several reasons, least of which are problems which have become evident with the II original street layout. Based upon data that we currently have, I the Arlington Avenue right-of-way would probably have been dif- ficult to extend to the southern perimeter of the plat to serve II future home sites. It is evident that there is a significant II grading problem in that construction activity to build the street would likely result in serious impact to the adjacent Class A II wetland as well as destruction of a number of trees on a wooded I bluff line through which the alignment runs. The roadway would also be expensive to construct since it could not have any homes II along the western side due to the presence of the wetland. Staff is also concerned with the original proposal that the Eagle I Circle cul-de-sac, which was shown off of Arlington Avenue, could ever be extended to the east as indicated. The goal of extending II the street to the east would be to service adjacent lots between I this site and Powers Boulevard in order that the number of curb cuts on both streets could be minimized. However, the alignment that was approved would have resulted in the running of a new II street within 15 feet of an existing home located east of the I Ersbo Addition and would have also resulted in the double fronting of lots between Eagle Circle and its extension and Lake II Lucy Road creating an undesirable residential environment. II During the past week, the City has obtained aerial topographic maps that will be presented to the Planning Commission when this II item is reviewed. From these maps we have concluded that the II best means of serving the area is to allow the Ersbo Addition to be accessed as proposed while working to combine driveways and/or II create a new cul-de-sac to service lots to the east as they are I II r II 1 - , 1 Ersbo Subdivision/WAP 1 II November 1, 1989 Page 5 subdivided. We also believe that when the MUSA Line is extended I II and adjacent properties are subdivided, there may be an oppor- tunity to bring in a new street from Lake Lucy Drive looping east to Powers Boulevard with the alignment dropping down from Lake II 1 Lucy on the west side of the wetland. The proposed new 300 ft. long cul-de-sac uses street grades 1 ranging from 2.2% to 6.6% which are acceptable by City standards. The proposed paved cul-de-sac bubble should be increased from a 40 ft. radius to a 42 ft. radius to meet City standards. Final plans and specs should be developed for staff approval. Existing I 1 street right-of-way granted under the orignal plat will need to be vacated. IUtilities I City water service is available from Lake Lu cy Road. An existing 6 inch line has been installed under Lake Lucy to the northeast II corner of the property and can provide adequate service. Staff is recommending that the water system be looped to serve future developments to the east and to provide adequate levels of ser- II vice. Therefore we are recommending that a watermain extension be stubbed between Lots 2 and 3 to the southeast corner of the plat. Sanitary sewer service is provided by an existing 6 inch II 1 line extending onto the property from Lake Lucy Road. This line is inadequately sized to accommodate the project and needs to be upgraded to an 8 inch size from the existing manhole in Lake Lucy Road. The fire hydrant located at the south end of the cul-de- I Isac needs to be provided with a 10 ft. clear radius. Grading/Drainage I 1 Site grading is quite extensive with the existing hillside being cut back to allow the construction of the cul-de-sac II' and building pads. The amount of disturbance, however, is very closely aligned with the grading plan that was approved with the original plat. Staff is recommending that the grading plans be accepted with a series of modifications as follows: II 1. To construct drainage swales around each of the homes to make sure that water is directed around the house pads. i I2. The plans illustrate a berm in the Lake Lucy Road right-of- way. This berm cannot be allowed in the right-of-way and should be removed from the plans. Staff believes the con- II I cept of a berm along the right-of-way is a valid one, however, and encourages the developer to relocate it onto his property. 1 I3. An erosion control plan acceptable to staff is required before grading work can be initiated. Type 3 erosion I 1 controls must be supplied along the western elevation to pro- tect the adjacent wetland. 1 i II Ersbo Subdivision/WAP II - November 1, 1989 Page 6 11 4. While the grading is virtually identical to the original plan, we note that there is some tree loss that will be I experienced along the hillside. Prior to initiation of grading, staff wants to walk the site with the developer's II engineer to make modifications to the grading plan that may be required to protect trees and to establish a no cut line I for trees that are to remain. Grading plans may be modified by staff in the field to protect trees where possible. I I The site naturally drains to the west into the adjacent wetland. Plans call for utilization of a storm sewer system to perpetuate II the natural flow. Catch basins in Eagle Circle will intercept I the flow directing it into a sedimentation basin on Lot 6. It will then outlet into an additional pipe into the wetland. Staff finds the drainage plan to be adequate, however, there are several modifications that are required. Based upon directives IIof the Planning Commission, staff is recommending: 1. That the sedimentation pond be provided with a skimmer ' Idevice. 2. Plans illustrate the outlet for the sedimentation pond I I running north the Lake Lucy Road right-of-way rather than discharging directly into the wetland. Outlet pipes should II be realigned to directly run water into the wetland. Additional engineering detail is required, however, based I upon current plans it appears as though the applicant may need to obtain a drainage and utility easement for the pipe II and outlet from an adjacent property owner to realign the pipe. II 3. Project approval by the Watershed District is required. II Park Dedication Fees IIThis plat has been reviewed by Park and Recreation staff in a manner consistent with the original approval, a cash dedication is II Irecommended. Wetland Alteration Permit I 1 The subject parcel is located adjacent to a Class A wetland. This wetland is protected by the City and by DNR. The proposed I development directs runoff from the site to the northwest corner l of the property into a holding pond and then discharges runoff into the adjacent wetland. Although a small amount of runoff is II being generated by the development, the proposed pond location ' will benefit in removing sediment from the runoff prior to it entering the Class A wetland. The discharge runoff from the pro- II posed site will occur across the adjacent property into the Class I A wetland. Therefore, a drainage easement shall be necessary from the property owner prior to final plat approval to insure II II II I - Ersbo Subdivision/WAP November 1, 1989 Page 7 I that the proposed drainage plan can be accommodated. In addition, a permit from the DNR will be required for construction to allow runoff 1 IIinto the Class A wetland. The proposed preliminary plat actually decreases impact to the Class I IA wetland over the existing approved plat in that the the improved street is being removed from adjacent to the Class A wetland. Easements IThe following easements and right-of-way should be provided: II1. Right-of-way for Eagle Circle. I 2. Request the City Council vacate right-of-way for existing streets 1 IIand easements approved under the original plat. 3. Utility easements are required for the proposed watermain and sanitary sewer alignments including the watermain stub between ILots 2 and 3 to the eastern property line. 4. Drainage and utility easements are required over the pond and I storm sewer pipes on Lot 6, Block 1; Lot 1, Block 2; and based upon final engineering design may be required over an adjacent parcel to the west. I5. Standard utility easements around the perimeter of each lot. Compliance Table I IICOMPLIANCE WITH THE ORDINANCE II RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT I Lot Lot Lot Home Area Width Depth Setbacks I 15,000 90 125 30' front, 20' rear, 10' side Block 1 II II Lot 1 15,547 117 132 N/A I 2 17,565 140 132 N/A II 3 15,840 105 129 N/A I 4 17,230 106 160 N/A 5 16,800 110 131 N/A 6 16,981 116 137 N/A IIBlock 2 I Lot 1 92,394 30* 257 65' front I I 80' east 100' west 130' rear I * Variances Required - Variance to allow 30' of frontage on Lot 1, Block 2. II II Ersbo Subdivision/WAP II November 1, 1989 Page 8 I IIRECOMMENDATION - WETLAND ALTERATION PERMIT Planning staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the I Ifollowing motion: "The Planning Commission recommends approval of Wetland I Alteration Permit Request #88-7 as presented on the plat stamped II "Received October 11, 1989", subject to the following conditions: 1. Acquisition of a drainage easement from the adjacent property I Iowner. 2. Approval of a permit from the Minnesota Department of Natural I Resources. I3. Creation of a storm water retention pond in the northwest corner of Lot 6, Block 1. I 1 4. Installation of Type III erosion control between the develop- ment and the Class A wetland. II 1 5. Compliance with conditions of Preliminary Plat #87-36." IRECOMMENDATION - PRELIMINARY PLAT Planning staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the II Ifollowing motion: "The Planning Commission recommends approval of Subdivision I I #87-36 as presented on the plat stamped "Received October 11, 1989", with a variance to allow a 30 foot lot width on Lot 1, I Block 2, subject to the following conditions: II 1. Provide final detailed plans of the streets and utility improvements. I I 2. Lots 1 and 6, Block 1 are to gain access solely by driveway to Eagle Circle. Access to Lake Lucy Road is prohibited. A I notice of this limitation should be placed in shared title of both lots. I 3. Provide final erosion control plans acceptable to staff. I Type III erosion control will be required along the western I perimeter of the site adjacent to the wetland. Prior to the initiation of grading, staff will walk the site with the II developer to mark out trees designated for preservation. I Staff will modify the plans as required to improve tree pre- servation efforts. Drainage swales are to be provided around ' each of the homes. The berm located in the Lake Lucy Road right-of-way is to be relocated onto Lot 1, Block 1. I II 1 II I - Ersbo Subdivision/WAP November 1, 1989 Page 9 4. Provide final drainage plans for approval by City Staff. ' Watershed District approval is required. 5. Easements to be provided: a. Right-of-way for Eagle Circle. b. Request the City Council vacate right-of-way for existing ' streets and easements approved under the original plat. c. Utility easements are required for the proposed watermain ' and sanitary sewer alignments including the watermain stub between Lots 2 and 3 to the eastern property line. ' d. Drainage and utility easements are required over the pond and storm sewer pipes on Lot 6 , Block 1; Lot 1, Block 2; and based upon final engineering design may be required over an adjacent parcel to the west. ' e. Standard utility easements around the perimeter of each lot. 6. Enter into a development contract with the City. 7. Compliance with the conditions of Wetland Alteration Permit #88-7." ATTACHMENTS i1. Revised drainage and grading plan dated November 1, 1989. 2. Revised preliminary street grades, sanitary sewer and water- main plans dated October, 1989. I 1 I I • ' - • . 1 1 --r I +.r •• . ' • , • r• :: •••_4_ :iri't_.d. s..•'.— `' I 33'5 S -' , •fmGL fT ,"j•.r. r� • s ?• Ob e •�` p -i I • • t • • _IS II I D r .....: . 30 . 1 1 - fig— cis, • ii a a wl ,I a • 30 1 •• a 1 0 t 1 10 • ••.•y' t• •.m i ii sy ,�� of r G*, i1 •c I . 1 / , . • {s' ! _ 137 , / • t •. —f,CI I/ .' A . I f 1.--1- 1 ♦ •/• joidef, O► 1 •� 1 i 17 :i { '� o ^10 ' N I 71 Pi 00 • .. _� g ._a 1 11 . -. tw . t • • ` • .' / ; is I ' r— - _■ • • 1 rum •• '. •' "•e', •,! ' % ♦ % \ -,• 1 • • to + , • ///// l , • - .1. _ • • / ' , l u e..7. t ' _ • • :at -- • .. 1 1 r• 1 . I • 1 1 n to 4 • 4 LUCY ROAD • • • • - , - _ . ..... , I. ,. . . _. Ise .P . I I 1 . WET�.ANp : _; ! I , I r iii-71 11.7_-.:Fn o 11 i JOHN CUM Mt10..IIIN . N r�— �. �. 1 . r 1 ( tr -• •I •' N �• ' N too--+• r • r it ACATED /, W �Ir� R CUEY cs• '' i 145 U g W g I I / u `j3h^�• i t it i CC VS 4 a. o .. cr II 31 i •. ai 4 •, 1 �1f_�1 I I ! I I N 41116% .6 W I/4, Nt 1/4, SW V4 4111111V ., IF ..—my .to s'Mil r 1 • 1 or R L. PETE,4SON I • , s� 6K 97,P. 319 a •-Rr HARD ORTENBLAD / r jarp ) Ng 117, P 175 ! is i///%!// /i _ 215 f 1elb4 I I IL i ONES C SAV1" T r ' , 1 }'•0rl N4,0. 1 r -t.~ s -71©A-p CO" CC QT •: x 4 I 5kAT� ,�� q w ';YlVStltt11 To U/ ' ` !�X Orr 140. 0 10 j r " SO I, Po s� Q y GM iF �' 1 as 0 I y C' u; �. I On Wu 1 .- •''"y.,_ 1 ; NS 1aens WWTALLA a1, • Z V ' ... ..). II / 1 • � ; 0K Is, • 16111 •!� • 2 s MS MN III: . INIII NM I•1111 INN NM Ns iiii . NE 'r .I. • e MIS IMO • i,, l3/J s3 ' �' •cote r`prwouc • 1 I �� 1 F——_ 53 j J -LA14E ,.LU^ GY 1,," \- ROAp `` \'Mr�S Jam— �1 1 ,S• 1 1 pp• nom \ 1 16—;—---e`- 11 117.54` N�• '�--.1.IL: .1 1 • s I s *'''''''... I°li i I i /1 ty I; /4 / J 1 1 a 111 .� ; 1 • 1 i : �" ` ~acs}g �I ;•• 1 I I i is �� N . • ; i •' I 1 I ii1 i /• • . 110 QOy 1• f/ • 1 •i IL t __-__•7I_; / •• L// i 1�' I I , • /o•f-- ••' - 1 If1 a • . •+1 . -�- i - ..4-� -1 ii J:/ / :II ;r 1- % \ I .1 1 1 I I / 110 4 I ' O.1 .....• - i 1 * , 1 Ji 1 �• / / !y �9• - ; ' ---.1'�- I --- --- - _ 1 I 1 -•• '• -•--',, • , �`0. =00�-' • 1 s1.- -„r;y.;/ �s. ". �''.• -: We+-lanA .-..-- 1 II I \�\\\ N N \ It - N\■....." ■ ___ P. ,., \ \\4\-\--...... ,\ \N " I Ifi .D ) I a \ N /"7.7>n i a i- ��i—_ Z �� \ '.� /,°-[° / //, . I 1 ) ,...v 11 t i) ---1 i , ,,,,„. / ..- ,\ ,.. ....› I i// 11 , / / P !! \ , , / - \\\ , - / 1 , ' .... , I -_ __ N\ ..„ / ' \ ) 1 / ,_ A 1 cli // ....1 � l 6 II t ` �/, LI � � / / / —. - 1 �= r eoum eae r owes IL I 1 I i P 11 I I su.----(011tro ---- I 1: 111 I CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 1, 1989 I Chairman Conrad called the meeting to order at 7:45 p.m. . MEMBERS PRESENT: Tim Erhart, Steve Emmings, Ladd Conrad, Jim Wildermuth and Brian Batzli MEMBERS ABSENT: Annette Ellson STAFF PRESENT: Paul Krauss, Director of Planning and Jo Ann Olsen, Senior" Planner . PUBLIC HEARING: I PRELIMINARY PLAT TO SUBDIVIDE 5.96 ACRES INTO 7 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON PROPERTY ZONED RSF, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY AND LOCATED EAST OF POWERS BOULEVARD AND JUST SOUTH OF LAKE LUCY ROAD, RICHARD ERSBO. I Paul Krauss presented the staff report. Conrad: Are you the applicants? Richard Ersbo: As far as changing the name, we'll comply with North or II South or whatever you want to call it. Krauss: You can come up with whatever the name is as long as It's Arlington something. Conrad: Any other comments based on the staff report that you have? Erhart moved, Emmings seconded to close the public hearing. All voted in favor and the motion carried. The public hearing was closed. I Wildermuth: After looking at this, I agree with the staff recommendation with the impact on the wetland. . .double frontage issue. . .I have one question. Jo Ann how close is this flag lot driveway coming to the wetland? Olsen: The existing driveway and it's probably about anywhere from 50 feel to the edge. Krauss: Based on the aerial it might even have been at one time... Here'41 the existing driveway as it comes down. You can see the wetland vegetatioll comes quite close to where the driveway is but it's not going to encroach any further. Olsen: They're not doing anything to the existing conditions. Batzli: But they'll be grading on the east side of the driveway? ' Olsen: Yes. 1 Planning Commission Meeting November 1, 1989 - Page 2 Krauss: The grading will take place in this vicinity. Olsen: There will be a holding pond also constructed. Wildermuth: There won't be any new grading? It will be an upgrade of the existing driveway? Krauss: The driveway will remain exactly as it is. Wildermuth: Okay. So nothing will happen there? That's all I have. Batzli: The first time we looked at this, we had some sort of skimmer device didn't we going into the holding pond? . Olsen: Right. That was an added condition and what happens is that it's a DNR protected wetland so it also has to go through a permit process with that. We usually when the plans and specs come in, that's where they add that if it's necessary. If the DNR wants it. If the Watershed District wants it. The engineering department did not feel it was necessary at this time but it's something that we usually add. • Batzli: I guess I was wondering why we wanted it the first time and not this time I guess was my question. Olsen: It seems like that was added at the Planning Commission level last time. nnimings: Isn't it condition 4 under the preliminary plat? Olsen: Yes. Batzli: Okay. I guess I was looking for it in the Wetland Alteration Permit. Sorry. Is it supposed to be in the preliminary plat rather than the wetland alteration permit? Olsen: It's part of the drainage easement that's on the plat also. Krauss: The preliminary plat would have the development agreement attached to it and that's the means by which we are sure that it's installed. Batzli: Do we normally or did we normally kind of start a trend where approval of one was conditioned upon approval of the other and in compliance with each other that we don't have those? Okay. My last question, and I agree pretty much with what Jim said. The drainage easement. Is that to the wetland then? Krauss: Yes. The outlet pipe is supposed to outlet directly into the wetland. Batzli: Should it clarify then which property owner they need the drainage easement from? The adjacent property owner to the west? Krauss: To the west. Planning Commission Meeting November 1, 1989 - Page 7 suggesting which might be to roll off at some point back onto that driveway because that driveway goes up a more gentle grade. Conrad: So that property to the rear Paul, how are we going to service that if it does get split up? Krauss: At this point with the way the ordinance is structured, you don't have to serve it. You are serving it with the existing driveway. You don't have to further subdivide it. It's somewhat difficult to guess at ' the future. I can show you this but unfortunately it just doesn't reproduce very well. If you want to come over and take a look at it. This was the composite that we put together because it really was the only way to see it. What you've got is the home. Here's the top of the hill. t Here's where they're excavating out the top of the bill to put in the cul-de-sac. Here's the grade and you can see how the driveway starts coming up the grade right there and there's a pretty significant bluff overlooking the wetland. This whole area, this corner here is really not part of that hillside and is probably not developable. The home, the swimming pool and the garage are pretty centrally located and against as subdividing it unless they're all removed. Erhart: This is all high ground over here? Krauss: This is all high ground back here. Erhart: How would that be served? Krauss: The MUSA line comes through here right now. What we were thinking, and we haven't had a chance to illustrate this is we were lookinc � at if the MUSA line's expanded and if this property is subdivided bringing in another public street as a cul-de-sac or a thru street and coming back down through here. (The commissioners were carrying on separate coversations at this point during discussion.) Richard Ersbo: I sit up on a hill that would be almost impossible for the cul-de-sac to go there. If you look over the back there, I have a drop down a hole about 40 feet and I'm sitting up higher than that. To put a cul-de-sac from where that. ..I'm sitting on a big hill. It's not flat. We went over this whole thing about 10 times already and this was the most feasible way we could do the whole thing. This is the third time we were going to have this approved. • Krauss: Let me say this. If I thought development was it not emminent but realistic on that parcel, we would try to do something to access it possibly a different way at this point. What we would make that determination is that we respect. . .opinion but what's more important to us if you look at the ground as easily developable. In our opinion, this ground isn't up here for a variety of reasons. The placement of the home %g and the grades being the most significant. Richard Ersbo: It'd be easier to put a ski slope down this. Planning Commission Meeting November 1, 1989 - Page 8 Conrad: My only comment is on the wetland alteration permit. It's more ' the process than this particular application. Normally, are we still having the applicants fill out a form for a wetland alteration permit? ' Olsen: We have that when they're actually going to be affecting or altering the wetland itself. We do give that form out. A lot of times the applicants don't have the knowledge to fill it out. It gets pretty detailed. When it's a larger subdivision that they really are going to be putting ponds within it and they have the services, we do still have them fill that out. This one we did not. Conrad: I guess just as a general point, I think we have to go through that process because Jo Ann you understand it but over the years I think it's been adapted to what kind of works and we don't know what that is. This particular application just triggered the thought again that I'm not seeing the real application. If it requires a permit, I guess I'm interested in seeing the application unless you persuade me, I understand _ what you're doing but I guess I'd like to go back through the mechanics of that process and typically what we had been doing Paul is that we'd have technical documentation, whether it.be DNR or Fish and Wildlife or whatever, accompany it or a report coming back from one of those experts that made us feel good. They were really helping us interpret our ordinance is basically what they were doing. But I'm not seeing that anymore so I'm not sure what we should be doing and maybe Jo Ann, given all her time here, is pretty comfortable but I'm kind of lost again because my ' - first reaction here was what are we doing to the wetland and how does it impact our ordinance and obviously not much but I don't know that. So I guess to our list of things to do, I kind of want to review the process. I don't know that we need to recreate anything but it's more the process sometime so at least I understand where we're going again. I have no other comments on this other than the street name. I guess I'm with Steve. I ' would think a special name called Eagle Circle would be clearer than a Court, Circle, Lane. That seems harder for me. If I were driving a fire truck, I'd rather find the only Eagle Street in town than one that I might be confused on but again, that's not my area of expertise. ' Krauss: I used to drive the fire truck. In a community like ours or others in which I've worked, when it's all said and done. The City's fully developed and you have 400 cul-de-sacs, it's hard to remember where they all are but if you prefer what we can do is just delete any reference to that condition now and we can consult with the fire marshall before it goes to the City Council and get a final reading on that. Conrad: Any more discussion? Is there a motion? ' Batzli: I move that the Planning Commission recommends approval of Wetland Alteration Permit Request #88-7 as presented on the plat stamped Received October 11th? Mine doesn't say October 11th though. I don't think. Is there a different plan for the wetland? My plan's stamped like October 26th or something. Conrad: Yeah, mine too. 1 I 'planning Commission Meeting I • November 1, 1989 - Page 9 Batzli: Was there a separate set of plans? Emmings: It says as presented on the plat and it wouldn't be would it? Batzli: Okay, well October 26th I'll say for now, 1989 subject to the following conditions. Conditions 1 thru 4 with the following added to the" end of condition 1. The words to the west" and a new condition 5 which reads compliance with conditions of Subdivision #87-36. 1 Emmings: Second. Batzli moved, Emmings seconded that the Planning Commission recommend 11 approval of Wetland Alteration Permit Request 088-7 as presented on the plat stamped October 26, 1989 and subject to the following conditions: , 1. Acquisition of a drainage easement from the adjacent property owner to the west. 2. Approval of a permit from the Minnesota Department of Natural 11 Resources. 3. Creation of a storm water retention pond in the northwest corner of Loll 6, Block 1. 4. Installation of Type 3 erosion control between the development and the r Class A wetland. 5. Compliance with the conditions of Subdivision #87-36. 1 All voted in favor and the motion carried. Conrad: Is there a motion on the preliminary plat? Wildermnth: I move the Planning Commission approve Subdivision #87-36 as presented on the plat stamped October 11th with a variance to allow a 30 foot lot width on Lot 1, Block 2 and subject to the conditions 1 thru 6. Batzli: I'll second it. I think the plans are again October 26th, not II October 11th. Wildermuth: I'll make that October 26th. t Batzli: And we don't want to say something like changing the name of the street designated Eagle Circle to something approved by the Public Safety 11 Department. Is that just going to be handled between... Wildermuth: ...check with the Fire Chief. I Conrad: It's not here is it? 1 I II Planning Commission Meeting • November 1, 1989 - Page 10 IIBatzli: No. It would be something they'd do. I Conrad: I'm just happy keeping it out of here unless you want to put it in. Batzli: That's fine as long as they, I remember seeing something actually ' from the Fire Chief or somebody at the Public Safety saying that they didn't want the same names in different locations in the City but I don't recall them saying anything about this instance. Do we want a condition 7 ' indicating compliance with the wetland alteration permit? Emmings: Yeah. ' Wildermuth: It'd probably be a good idea. • • ' Wildermuth moved, Batzli seconded that the Planning Commission recommend approval of Subdivision Request #87-36 as presented on the plat stamped "Received October 26, 1989" with a variance to allow a 30 foot lot width on ' Lot 1, Block 2, subject to the following conditions: 1. Provide final detailed plans of the streets and utility improvements. The plans should be modified as follows: a. Increase the paved cul-de-sac radius to 42 feet. ' b. Replace the existing 6" sanitary sewer to Lake Lucy Road and utilize an 8" line exclusively to serve the plat. c. Extend water main service between Lots 2 and 3 with a stub ending at the east property line. d. The fire hydrant at the end of the cul-de-sac is to be provided Iwith a 10 foot clear radius. 2. Lots 1 and 6, Block 1 are to gain access solely by driveway to Eagle Circle. Access to Lake Lucy Road is prohibited. A notice of this limitation should be placed in shared title of both lots. 3. Provide final erosion control plans acceptable to staff. Type III erosion control will be required along teh western perimeter of teh site adjacent to the wetland. Psios to the initiation of grading, staff will walk the site with the developer to mark out trees designated for preservation. Staff will modify the plans as required to improve tree preservation efforts. Drainage swales are to be provided around eafch of the homes. The berm located in the Lake Lucy ' Road right-of-way is to be relocated onto Lot 1, Block 1. 4. Provide final drainage plans for approval by City Staff. Provide a skimmer device on the sedimentation pond. Redirect the pond outlet ' directly into the wetland providing the City with such easements that may be required to cross an adjacent property. Watershed District approval of the plat is required. • I I Planning Commission Meeting I November 1, 1989 - Page 11 • 5. Easements to be provided: a. Right-of-way for Eagle Circle. • b. Request the City Council vacate right-of-way for existing streets II and easements approved under the original plat. c. Utility easements are required for the proposed watermain and sanitary sewer alignments including the watermain stub between Lots` 2 and 3 to the eastern property line. d. Drainage and utility easements are required over the pond and storm sewer pipes on Lot 6, Block 1; Lot 1, Block 2 and based upon final engineering design may be required over an adjacent parcel to'the west. ' I e. Standard utility easements around the perimeter of each lot. 6. Enter into a development contract with the City. 1 7. Compliance with the conditions of Wetland Alteration Permit #88-7. All voted in favor except Erhart and Emmings who opposed and the motion carried with a vote of 3 to 2. Conrad: And the reasons? Emmings: I think I set them forth enough. It seems to me that this plan II could be modified by moving that cul-de-sac along the contour or something. I think it's short sighted to have the only access to that large lot in the rear come along that existing driveway. I Conrad: Tim, your feelings? Erhart: Pretty much the same reasons. I guess I don't strongly oppose it II but I'd sure like us to try a little harder to find a way to avoid having that driveway between those lots. Lot 6, 5 and 4 and that wetland and also to avoid future problems with access in the Lot 1, Block 2. Conrad: Paul, in terms of future use of that driveway that access the back lot, there's no way that the City has to restrict it's use. ' Krauss: You can't bind the actions of future Councils either. Wildermuth: The topography is going to pretty well restrict the use right?" Conrad: Probably. Emmings: Give me a bulldozer. I I I Planning Commission Meeting - - November 1, 1989 - Page 12 IIKrauss: At this point in time Mr. Chairman, the only way to get additional building back there is to come back and ask for additional variances. The ' way things are structured right now and that's certainly nothing that. you have to automatically have to approve. • Conrad: I think it's imporant and obvious things change and Planning ' Commissions and Councils change but I think it has to be a real clear message that, at least as I voted in favor of this, it was pretty much with the assumption that that back parcel would not be changed. Now you may ' sell and that's obviously your right and that future developer or whatever could do whatever but I just don't, I would not be of mind to allow any increase traffic on the current one driveway going back but there's really ' no way to enforce that posture to my knowledge. Anyway, any other comments? PUBLIC HEARING: 1 ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO AMEND THE CITY CODE WITH REGARD TO ESTABLISHING THE MAXIMUM LOT SIZE FOR CHURCH DEVELOPMENT AT 15 ACRES. Paul Krauss presented the staff report. Conrad: It's a public hearing. It was published. Peter Beck obviously knows that this is an item. I kind of thought he'd be here. Wildermuth: It didn't give any reaction to it which I'm surprised at. Conrad: And he is still under retainer? Olsen: I showed him the ordinance when Roger first had drafted it when it had 25 acres. When he was still involved with Eckankar, with the development contract and such and that didn't concern them. ' Conrad: So the public notice was sent to Peter or was it sent to Eckankar or how? Krauss: I think it was sent to Peter. Conrad: And we would send it to him versus the property owners? ' Olsen: It just was given to him because he happened to be in the office the day I received it actually. Conrad: Are we comfortable that that's... Krauss: Legal notice is published in the official newspaper. Conrad: And there is no other policy stating that we individually identify those that are impacted by the Ordinance? ' Olsen: We've done it in the past. I • • CITYOF 1 CHANHASSEN • " - 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 1 I MEMORANDUM TO: JoAnn Olson FROM: Mark Littfin, Fire Inspector , DATE: August 22, 1989 RE: Ersbo 1 Comments and recommendations: Fire hydrant shall be located at end of cul-de-sac with a ten-foot clear radius around hydrant. ML:l w 1 I I I I I i�' 0 _ I CITYOF _ 1 4 f. li) CHANHASSEN , . 4 ___ _ , . , . ... :, .f. .,,,f_ ,,,k 1 , • _,. , 690 COULTER DRIVE• P.O. BOX 147• CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 -1 \ (612)937-1900• FAX(612)937-5739 I MEMORANDUM I TO: Jo Ann Olsen, Senior Planner FROM: Dave Hempel, Sr. Engineering Technician ; fN I DATE: October 27, 1989 SUBJ: Preliminary Plat Review for Ersbo Addition II File No. 87-36 Subdivision Upon review of the preliminary plat, grading lat, radin plan, street and II utility plans dated October, 1989, submitted by William Engelhardt Associates, INc. , I offer the following comments and II recommendations. : Sanitary Sewer I Plans propose connecting to City sanitary sewer from Lake Lucy Road at the northeast corner : f the plat. An existing 6-inch service line was reviousl extended to the , P y property for a single house hookup. The plans should be modified to include replace- ment of the existing 6-inch line with an 8-inch line from the existing manhole in Laker;.Lucy Road. I Watermain City water serviceAs available from Lake '- .Lucy Road. An existing 6-inch line was 1previously stubbed across _Lake Lucy Road to the northeast corner -of =t.he°=plat-and `will provide adequate water supply for :this -plat:: : :Plans :propose-Approxmately =400::feet of II dead-end watermain. It is desirable to loop the" water-system for future development and improved water service to this sub- division. Therefore, the watermain should .be-extended between II Lots 2 and 3 to the southeast corner -of the plat. Roadway T I he plans propose a 300-foot cul-de-sac off of Lake Lucy Road across from Arlington Court with street grades ranging from 2.2% to 6.6%. The proposed street is a 31-foot wide back-to-back II urban section within a 50-foot right-of-way. The cul-de-sac is designed with a 40-foot radius. To be consistent with the City's standard cul-de-sac design, the 40-foot radius should be II increased to 42 feet. II Jo Ann Olsen I - October 27, 1989 Page 2 Previous plans for this subdivision made allowances for a future street access to the south. However, it is felt due to the ' existing terrain and adjacent wetland, access to the south would not be feasible from this parcel. Grading and Drainage ' The plans propose grading over a majority of the site which will include removal of some trees. The hillside is proposed to be cut approximately 12 feet to provide for house pads. Slopes along this hillside are proposed at 3:1. It is recommended that drainage swales be constructed between all house pads and the ' upstream sides of the lots to help direct drainage around and away from the proposed house pads. Earth berms are proposed along Lake Lucy Road within the proposed ' right-of-way. These berms should be relocated outside the right- of-way. ' Proposed drainage from the development will follow the natural drainage path towards the wetland west of the plat. A storm sewer system will convey storm runoff via pipe into a detention pond located on the northwest corner of Lot 6 which outlets via ' pipe into the adjacent wetland. The outlet pipe should be realigned to direct runoff into the wetland instead of the Lake Lucy Road right-of-way. The applicant may need to acquire a ' drainage easement across the property west of the plat to accomplish this. Due to the small size of this detention pond, staff feels that no skimmer control device is necessary unless ' the DNR or Watershed District requires one. Based on drainage calculations supplied by the applicant, it appears the pond is adequate for maintaining the predeveloped runoff rate and pro- viding adequate storage for a 100-year storm event. ' Erosion Control ' The plans propose erosion control along the north and west peri- meters of the plat. The erosion control type is not specified on the plans. Due to the potention impact on the adjacent wetlands, it is recommended that Type III erosion control be installed. ' Recommended Conditions ' 1. The applicant shall enter into a development contract with the City and provide the City with the necessary financial sureties to guarantee proper installation of the public improvements. 2. The applicant shall pursue acquisition of a drainage easement across the parcel to the west of the proposed plat for drainage purposes. 11 Jo ann Olsen II October 27, 1989 Page 3 3. Drainage swales shall be provided between the proposed house pads and upstream slopes to provide adequate drainage around and away from the house pads. , 4. The plans should be modified to include replacement of the existing 6-inch sanitary sewer service stub with an 8-inch line from the existing manhole in Lake Lucy Road. 5. Lake Lucy Road shall be restored to the pre-existing 9-ton road section (see attached section) including any fabric and/or drain tile which may be present. All pavement markings shall be re-established, i.e. trail. 6. The earth berm shall be relocated outside of the proposed right-of-way. 7. The applicant shall obtain and comply with all conditions of , the Watershed District and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) . 8. Wood-fiber blankets shall be used to stabilize all slopes greater than 3:1. 9. All street and utility construction shall be in accordance with the City 's standard specifications for urban construc- tion. 10. The cul-de-sac radius should be increased to 42 feet ' 11. Erosion control shall be Type III . 12. Construction plans for street and utility installation shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval. , 13. Lot 1 and Lot 6 shall not be allowed driveway access to Lake Lucy Road. 14. Plans shall rovide concrete valley P y gutter across Eagle Circle at Lake Lucy Road. 15. Extend watermain to southeast property corner between Lots 2 and 3 for future looping of system. 11 I I I _ (- C N / $ `.� - - 1 1 '`_ . I x s ' �� In '"D 4 -+ > 4. I 1► s" = % s` - Q m s ) • _ �o .. �1 A • to • =, i I 1 • ! r I b m it I N I NICK r 0..� •••• al • f I A allif . ai .e: al 4 ..I � at in I I F �. Z - Ali R "' xi N • NS � cED .. - pa, T7 S; D =A =1 i w , •I �i 1 • y C� = p ; p C m j ~ � = O CD C N O y ; a N ' • D f* m , " El0 , •- i 0 m n m c -c - _ tD H 2 2 x N 2� Iq 11 Z M IR•„ es ; D° ‘ j G7 •0 N N C \ D ID O N W ` - r !q i p V � 0 w Ili 1 rri ' 0 wa N • D v - i• -- • r=' • ■ I - I 0 • I • • - RE Ei�lly • OFFI AL COPY I APR 191988 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. DEPT. CITY OF CHAN M‘....1._ PRELIMINARY WARY PLAT-NO. -� • DTTED tSi;`•.i iiZ i 4 AFPVDATE .PLANSUBM .CO . �' I .1• ID APPVD.COUNCIL . 111.16,wt. W A �— a �. ,^ 0. f— J — ---4 — 'c':r A-D- ��ri y �' �� '� / / rsrfff• TAE ,, _��♦ ��� N/ s• s� 4. Icy'' _ CC 91rr Y o. = •�1 / t t . . p S 1 I:. 1 vr. x/ -. A I / ./ I 4:7 ; •• 1 I tt.. '1 • 1 I ••• a ' ekr./-:' 4( , %F f 1r y j —syB . .'• .; . ',.;,; ..1,1 . 1.1111.1.-1c; ..ti,.. /., ...........1./. ; IA - r i i/• I Ilair 4-,./. ah;,_-- . ..-r. '1' ,' I Li,— I I i _.q,'"!': ;‘ ,'' II?,r/eggf V . ... t %, • l' .�. r,_ .:, _ ,,,. .. ,„ ....,,,,,, i Ave If:-- IF ! 1 çf I 4 :. ,ti '. y 1 ��1 t : . . 'i 0 . • / 2,--27.004„-e,/,..ti.:._,,, --.:-1.-,,-z-7: ' <ill' ti i. \ \ .: - -.is: //'..,-",,,treevioit:,. .e_‘\,, ,N.t.. i iii' ,c* -, 1 4.41 .' .i ' ..::N.,,---7- .. ; . _ __ i .,.. I ,� -r > , Z 4 _ / i - /,, . le�►"u j I t $ II�// / oo� wt 94 `Q ` .1 I • •�i " I 1 \LZI. l'-‘, - - 07 I . CITYOF 5R6 ... ,,,A , CHANHASSEN I 1 - <_\5r- 4'" - 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 IMarch 20, 1989 1 Mr. Richard Ersbo 1211 Lake Lucy Road i' Chanhassen, MN 5531!71 I . , Re: Ersbo Addition :: IDear Mr. Ersbo: It has come to staff's attention that the final plat for Ersbo II Addition has been filed with_ Carver County prior to specific con- ditions of final plat approval being met. Specifically, the development contract and the financial security must be provided to the city and recorded with Carver County prior to any building 11 permits or construction taking place on the site. Attached is a copy of the development contract which was approbed I by the City Council on July 25, 1988. As you can see there are blanks that need to be filled in which your engineer can help you with. IIPlease contact either me or Gary Warren, City Engineer to fina- lize the development contract and submit the security. Also, note if any property is sold prior to completing the above steps, I the new owners will be required to consent to the recording of the development contract. I Again, the lots will not be able to be developed until these are received and recorded by the city. - Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. ISincerely, Jo Ann Olsen IAssistant City Planner JO:v Icc: Gary Warren Development contract file II II . . - CITY OF CHANHASSEN DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT I (Developer Installed Improvements) SPECIAL PROVISIONS , AGREEMENT dated , 1988, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation, ("City") , and RICHARD ERSBO, a widower and not remarried (the "Developer") . 111 1. Request Ebb Plat Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a plat for ERSBO ADDITION (referred to in this Contract I as the "plat") . The land is legally described on the attached Exhibit "A" 2. Conditions of Plat-Approval. The City hereby approves the 11 plat on condition that the Developer enter into this Contract and furnish the security required by it. 1 3. Development Plans. The plat shall be developed in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to II this Contract. With the exception of Plan A, the plans may be prepared, subject to City approval, after entering the Contract, but before commencement of any work in the plat. If the plans vary from the written I terms of this Contract, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A--Plat dated , 19 , prepared , by Plan B--Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan dated ' , 19 , prepared by Plan C--Plans and Specifications for Improvements dated 19 , prepared by 1 r07/06/88 I I • • (.1) (7) . • , 4. Improvements. The Developer shall install and pay for the following: A. Sanitary Sewer System ' B. Water System . C. Storm Water Drainage System D. Streets ' E. Concrete Curb and Gutter s F. Stree 1 Signs G. Street Lights H. Site Grading I. Underground Utilities (gas, electric, phone, CATV) J. Setting of Lot -and Block Monuments 11 K. Surveying and Staking S. Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required improvements by November 30, 1988. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the ' Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 6. Security. To guarantee compliance with the terms. of this Contract, payment of special assessments, payment of the costs of all public improvements, and construction of all public improvements, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit from a bank, cash escrow, or equivalent ("security") for $ . The amount of the security was calculated as 110% of the following: ' Sanitary sewer $ Watermain $ -2- . .- • • - (7) - 1 . 1 On-site storm sewer $ Streets $ 1 Street lights and signs i Erosion control $ Engineering, sux r i.n , Y� g, and inspection $ TOTAL COST -OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS $ 1 T This breakdown is for Yistorical reference; it is not a restriction on the use of the security. The security shall be subject to the approval 1 of the City. The security shall be for a term ending December 31, 1988. The City may draw down the security, without notice, for any violation 1 of the terms of this Contract. -if the required public improvements are not completed at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the security, the City may also draw it down. If the security is drawn down, the draw shall be used to cure the default. With City approval the security may be reduced from time to time as financial obligations are paid, but in no case shall the security be reduced to a point less than 25% of the original amount until all improvements are complete and accepted by the City. 1 7. Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its 1 employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by registered mail at the following address: 1211 Lake Lucy Road, Chanhassen, Minnesota - 55317. Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by registered mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall, 690 Coulter Drive, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317. -3- I . . (7) - ("/ II8. Other Special Conditions. P itions. A. A berming and landscaping plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to final plat approval providing screening on the two double frontage lots adjacent to Lake ' Lucy Road. B. The Developer shall pursue a utility easement across the parcel to the east of the proposed plat such that a manhole located 20 feet south of Lake Lucy Road may be eliminated. C. Drainage swales shall be provided between the proposed ' house pads and the upstream slopes to provide adequate drainage around and away from the house pads. ' D. The Developer shall maintain the 50 foot right-of-way and driveway as shown 'in Attachment No. 3 until such time as the proposed north/south road is extended to the south as a public roadway. ' E. The watermain shall be jacked under Lake Lucy Road. F. The Developer shall exert all due care to minimize destruction of Lake Lucy Road. All restoration on Lake Lucy Road shall be to the existing 9 ton road section specifications. G. Two 20 foot utility easements shall be provided as described previously as part of the final plat review process. H. The Developer shall provide storm sewer calculations which verify the preservation of the pre-developed runoff rate and all storm sewer system capacities as part of the plans and specifications review process. ' I. The Developer shall obtain and comply with all conditions of the Watershed District. ' J. Wood-fiber blankets or equivalent shall be used to stabilize all disturbed slopes greater than 3:1. K. The Developer shall be responsible for daily on and off site cleanup caused by construction of this site. L. The Developer shall meet the following conditions concerning the wetland alteration permit: 1. Creation of a storm water retention pond on the northwest corner of Lot 1. 2. As part of the plans and specifications for ' utilities, the Developer shall create a culvert drainage solution beyond the holding pond which is acceptable to the property owner to the west and to the City. I -4- . . . II 3. Approval of a permit shall be obtained from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 4. Developer shall comply with the conditions of subdivision approval No. 87-36. 9. General Conditions.. The general provisions of this 1 Contract are attached as Exhibit •B" and incorporated herein. CITY OF CHANHASSEN f i BY: (SEAL) _ 44/em n-iir-44a , Mayor BY: Don Ashworth, City Manager DEVELOPER: 1 RICHARD ERSBO i STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this II of , 1988, by Thomas L. Hamilton, Mayor, and by Don Ashworth, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the. authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC i I 1 r -5- I 1 - • (7) (7) II STATE OF MINNESOTA ) 1 COUNTY OF ( ss.) ' The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of remarried. , 1988, by RICHARD ERSBO, a widower and not NOTARY PUBLIC ' r DRAFTED BY: 1 Grannis, Grannis, Farrell & Knutson, P.A. - 1 403 Norwest Bank Building 161 North Concord Exchange South St. Paul, MN - 55075 (612) 455-1661 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 -6- II CONSENT , fee owners of all or , part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, affirm and consent to the provisions thereof and agree to be bound by the provisions as the II same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by them. Dated this day-=of , 19 ' i STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF - ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this II day of , 19 , by NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: Grannis, Grannis, Farrell ' & Knutson, P.A. 403 Norwest Bank Building 16i North Concord Exchange South St. Paul, MN 55075 (612) 455-1661 1 11 -7- I .177- 0 - . . . CITY OF CHANHASSEN DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Developer Installed Improvements) EXHIBIT "B" GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. Right to Proceed. Within the plat or land to be platted, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove 1 f trees, construct sewertlines, water lines, streets, utilities, public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security has been received by the City, 3) the plat has been recorded with the County Recorder's Office of the County where the plat is located, and 4) the City Engineer has issued a written letter that the foregoing conditions have been satisfied and then the Developer may proceed. 2. Phased Development. If the plat is a phase of a multi- ! phased preliminary plat, the City may refuse to approve final plats of ' subsequent phases if the Developer has breached this Contract -and the breach has not been remedied. Development of subsequent phases may not proceed until Development Contracts for such phases are approved by the City. 3. Effect of Subdivision Approval. For two (2) years from the date of this Contract, no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, except an amendment placing the plat in the current urban service area, ' or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved plat unless I -8- . . . • . (- , IIrequired by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Contract to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, II official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Contract. 4. Improvements. The improvements specified in the Special t Provisions of this Contract shall be installed in accordance with City standards, ordinances;- and plans and specifications which have been I prepared and signed by a competent registered professional engineer furnished to the City and approved by the City Engineer. The Developer 1 shall obtain all necessary permits from the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission and other agencies before proceeding with construction. The Developer shall instruct its engineer to provide adequate field inspection personnel to assure an acceptable level of quality control to the extent that the Developer's engineer will be able to certify that the construction work meets the approved City standards as a condition of City acceptance. In addition, the City may, at the City's discretion and at the Developer's expense, have one or more City inspectors and a soil engineer inspect the work on a full or part-time basis. The Developer or his engineer shall schedule a preconstruction meeting at a Mutually agreeable time at the City Council chambers with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. Within sixty (60) days after the completion of the improvements and before the security is released, the Developer 1 per shall supply the City with the following: (1) a complete set of reproducible t Mylar as-built plans, (2) two complete sets of blue line as-built plans, -9- II . -, II (3) two complete sets of utility tie sheets, 4 ( ) location of buried 11 fabric used for soil stabilization, (5) location stationing of all utility stubs, and (6) bench mark network. 5. License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in 1 conjunction with plat development. r 6. Erosion Control. Before the site is rough graded, and before any utility construction is commenced or building permits are issued, the erosion control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented by the 1 Developer and inspected and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations g p rations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be certified seed to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion at the Developer's expense. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. No development will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless the plat is in full compliance with the erosion control requirements. Erosion control I -10- needs to be maintained until vegetation cover has been restored, even if I/ after construction as been completed and accepted. After completion of construction the City will remove the silt fences. To a for To p ay the removal, before the City signs the final plat the Developer shall pay the City a fee of $1.00 per foot of silt fence that is required to be constructed in accordance with the erosion control plan for the plat, I Plan B. 7. Clean up. The Developer shall daily clean, on and off 11 site, dirt and debris from streets and the surrounding area that has J resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. 8. Acceptance and Ownership of Improvements. Upon completion and acceptance by the City of the work and construction required by this Contract, the improvements lying within public easements shall become City property. After completion of the improvements, a representative of 11 the contractor, and a representative of the Developer's engineer will make a final inspection of the work with the City Engineer. Before the City accepts the improvements, the City Engineer shall be satisfied that all work is satisfactorily completed in accordance with the approved 1 plans and specifications and the Developer and his engineer shall submit a written statement attesting to same with appropriate contractor waivers. Final acceptance of the public improvements shall be by City Council resolution. 9. Claims. In the event that the City receives claims from labor, materialmen, or others that work required by this Contract has been performed, the sums due them have not been paid, and the laborers, materialmen, or others are seeking payment out of the financial I guarantees posted with the City, and if the claims are not resolved at I -11- II least ninety (90) days before the security required by this Contract - will expire, the Developer hereby authorizes the City to commence an 11 Interpleader action pursuant to Rule 22, Minnesota Rules of Civil IIProcedure for the District Courts, to draw upon the letters of credit in an amount up to 125% of the claim(s) and deposit the funds in compliance IIwith the Rule, and upon such deposit, the Developer shall release, discharge, and dismiss the City from any further proceedings as it IIpertains to the letters of credit deposited with the District Court, except that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to determine attorneys' II fees. 11 10. Park and Trail Dedication. Prior to the issuance of building permits for residential construction within the plat, the IIDeveloper, its successors or assigns, shall pay to the City the park and trail dedication fees then in force pursuant to Chanhassen City 1 Ordinances and City Council resolutions. 11 11. Landscaping. Unless the lot already has one tree on it, the Developer shall plant a tree on every lot in the plat. Suitable trees include: Maples Ash _ I Linden Basswood Green Ash Birch Honeylocust Ginko (male only) II Hackberry Kentucky Coffee Tree Oak Other species of trees may be approved by the building inspector. Trees IIwhich can cause a public nuisance, such as cotton producing trees, or IIcan be a public hazard, such as bug infestation or weak bark, are prohibited. The minimum tree size shall be two (2) inches caliper, IIeither bare root in season, or balled and burlapped. The trees may not I -12- 11 (7) (71 IF be planted in the boulevard. The Developer shall sod the front yard, boulevard, side yards to the rear of the structure on every lot, and drainage ways. Weather permitting, the trees, sod, and seed shall be planted before Certificates of Occupancy are issued for a lot. I 12. Warranty. The Developer warrants all work required to be performed by it against poor material and faulty workmanship for a period of one (1) year after its completion and acceptance by the City. All trees, grass, and sod shall be warranted to be alive, of oo g d quality, and disease free at the time of planting. All trees shall be warranted for twelve (12) months from the time of planting. The Developer shall post maintenance bonds or other security acceptable to I the City to secure the warranties at the time of final acceptance. 13. Lot Plans. Prior to the issuance of building permits an acceptable Grading, Erosion Control, and Tree Removal Plan shall be submitted for each lot as required in the Special Provisions, for review and approval by the City Engineer. Each plan shall assure that drainage I is maintained away from buildings and that tree removal is consistent with City Ordinance. 14. Existing Assessments. Any existing assessments Against the II plat will be respread against the plat in accordance with City standards. I 15. Street Lighting. Before the City signs the final plat, the Developer shall pay the City a fee of $200.00 for each street light . I installed in the plat. The fee shall be used by the City for furnishing electricity for each light for twenty (20) months or until homes have been built on each lot in the plat, whichever first occurs. I -13- 1 16. Street Signs. All street name and traffic signs required by the City as a part of the public improvements shall be furnished and installed by the City at the sole expense of the Developer. 17. Responsibility for Costs. ' A. The Developer shall pay an administrative fee in conjunction with the development of the plat to cover the cost of City staff time and overhead. The fee shall be calculated as follows: i) if the cost of the construction of public improvements is less than $500,000, three percent (3%) of construction costs; ii) if the cost of the construction of public improvements is between $500, 000 and $1, 000, 000, two percent (2%) of construction costs; iii) if the cost of the construction of public improvements is over $1,000, 000, one and one-half ' percent (1 1/2%) of construction costs. Before the City signs the final plat, the Developer shall deposit with the City a fee based upon construction estimates. After construction is completed, the final fee shall be determined based upon actual construction costs. The cost of public improvements is defined ed in paragraph 6 of the Special Provisions. B. In addition to the administrative fee, the Developer shall reimburse the City for all out-of-pocket costs incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting development of the plat. C. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from plat approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or ' incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. -14- 1 ( ) (7) 1 D. In addition to the administrative fee, the Developer II shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Contract, including engineering and g g g attorneys' fees. E. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Contract within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all plat development work and construction, including but not limited to the issuance of building permits for lots which the Developer may or may not have sold, until the bills are paid in full. I Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of 8% per year. I F. In addition to the charges and special assessments referred to herein, other charges and special assessments may be imposed such as but not limited to sewer availability charges ("SAC") , City I water connection charges, City sewer connection charges, and building permit fees. I 18. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred b Y ense P by the City, provided the Developer is first given notice of the work in default, not II less than four (4) days in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court I order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost ost in whole or in part. I I -15- II 19. Miscellaneous. A. Construction Trailers. Placement of on-site construction trailers and temporary job site offices shall be approved by the City Engineer as a part of the pre-construction meeting for installation of public improvements. Trailers shall be removed from the subject property within thirty (30) days following the acceptance of the public improvements unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. B. Postal Service. The Developer shall provide for the maintenance of postal service in accordance with the local Postmaster's 11 request. ' C. Third Parties. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Contract. ' D. Breach of Contract. Breach of the terms of this Contract by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including lots sold to third parties. E. Severability. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. F. Delays. If building permits are issued prior to the completion and acceptance of public improvements, the Developer assumes 1 all resulting liability and costs from delays in completion Y p tion of public improvements and damage to public improvements caused by the City, Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, materialmen, employees, agents, or third parties. G. Occupancy. Unless approved in writing by the City 11 engineer, no one may occupy a building for which a building permit g p t is -16- I . . 0 11. issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface. H. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City I Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. I. Release. This Contract shall run with the land and may II be recorded against the title to the property . After the Developer has completed the work required of it under this Contract, at the I Developer's request the City will execute and deliver to the Developer a release. J. Insurance. Developer shall take out and maintain until II six (6) months after the City has accepted the public improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, II including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Developer's work or the work of its subcontractors or by one directly or II indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than $500,000 for one person and $1,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $200,000 I for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of $1,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy, II and the Developer shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the plat. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given ten (10) days advance written notice II -17- of the cancellation of the insurance. The certificate may not contain any disclaimer for failure to give the required notice. K. Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing imay be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. L. Assignability. The Developer may not assign this Contract without the written permission of the City Council. The ' Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or more lots, the entire plat, or any part of it. M. Construction Hours. Construction equipment may only be operated in the plat between 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. , Monday through Saturday. Operation of construction equipment is also prohibited on the following holidays: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Labor Day, July 4th, Christmas Eve Day, and Christmas Day. I I I -18- j it... 1 1 I 50ft. RIGHT OF WAY I R iii.Niti I _ f 1 1 i 1 t i . ; #I t , III t I- I 1 t I f I f I f I I LAKE LUCY ROAD I A TT A nURAI''I\IT n 1 CITY0OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 January 12, 1989 Mr. Richard Ersbo 1211 Lake Lucy Road Chanhassen, MN 55317 and Mr. Willis Gilliard 516 Morgan Avenue No. Minneapolis, MN 55405 Dear Gentlemen: 11 This is to confirm that the City Council at the January 9, 1989, meeting approved the final plat for Ersbo Addition subject to the following conditions: 1. A final landscaping plan shall be submitted as part of the development contract providing screening on the two double frontage lots adjacent to Lake Lucy Road. 2. The applicant shall enter into a development contract with the City and provide the City with the necessary financial sureties to guarantee proper installation of these public improvements. 3. The applicant shall pursue a utility easement across the par- cel to the east of the proposed plat such that a manhole located 20 feet south of Lake Lucy Road may be eliminated. • 1 4. Drainage swales shall be provided between the proposed house pads and the upstream slopes to provide adequate drainage around and away from the house pads. 5. The watermain shall be jacked under Lake Lucy Road. 6. The applicant shall exert all due care to minimize destruc- tion of Lake Lucy Road. All restoration on Lake Lucy Road shall be to the existing 9-ton road section specifications. ' 7. The applicant shall provide stormsewer calculations which verify the preservation of the pre-developed runoff rate and all storm sewer system capacities as part of the plans and 11 specifications review process. 11 • January 12, 1989 Page 2 " 8. The developer shall obtain and comply with all conditions of _ the Watershed District. 9. Wood-fiber blankets or equivalent shall be used to stabilize all disturbed slopes greater than 3:1. 10. The developer shall be responsible for daily on and off-site cleanup caused by construction of this site. I 11. Park and trail fees shall be required at time of building = -permit application in lieu of parkland dedication. I 12. Compliance with the conditions of the Wetland Alteration Permit #88-7. The next step in the process is to execute a development contract with the city. The City Engineer prepares the development contract. The development contract must be approved by the City I Council. Upon execution of the development contract, the letter of credit and all other administrative fees must accompany the contract. Easement documents for dedication of the road ease- ments to the east of the proposed cul-de-sac and along the western border of your property will need to be prepared for each of these easements by your surveyor. Attached to assist you in finalizing your project is a checklist to accomplish execution of the development contract and receiving plan and specification approval for the construction of the street and utilities. The plan and specification review process will require prepara- I tion of the construction plans certified by a registered civil engineer. These plans are the construction drawings that need to. be approved by the Engineer Department as well as the City Council. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. I Sincerely,6141 Stephen Hanson Planning Director SH:v • • i i I 0 f- v; --k • 41 ..1 . CITYbF li I CHANHASSEN , / '` 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 '` _:._ 612 937-1900 t ) ' 1 MEMORANDUM . ...✓ . fr- 1 TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager : :; --- FROM: Steve Hanson, Planning Director CCU" ::,�:;.:e� 0 ���si�n II DATE: January 4, 1989 k.:=S.::..:...: 0 CeLMil I- 9 'AL__ SUBJ: Final Plat Approval, Ersbo Addition IIFile No. 87-36 Subdivision The preliminary plat for Ersbo Addition was approved by the City Council on June 13, 1988. This approval was subject to the following conditions: 11 1. A berming and landscaping plan-shall be submitted prior to final plat approval providing screening on the two double frontage lots adjacent to Lake Lucy Road. I/ 2. The applicant shall enter into a development contract with the City and provide the City with the necessary financial sureties to guarantee proper installation of these public IIimprovements. , 3. The applicant shall pursue a utility easement across the par- 1 cel to the east of the proposed plat such that a manhole located 20 feet south of Lake Lucy Road may be eliminated. I 4. Drainage swales shall be provided between the proposed house pads and the upstream slopes to provide adequate drainage around and away from the house pads. . II 5. The applicant shall maintain the 50-foot right-of-way and driveway as shown in Attachment No. 3 until such time as the proposed north/south road is extended to the south as a IIpublic roadway. 6. The watermain shall be jacked under Lake Lucy Road. Il. The applicant shall exert all due care to minimize destruc- tion of Lake Lucy Road. All restoration on Lake Lucy Road shall be to the existing 9-ton road section specifications. I 11 11 �.., (.) Don Ashworth January 4, 1989 Page 2 _ 8. Two 20-foot utility easements shall be provided as described I previously in this report as part of the final plat review process. 9. The applicant shall provide stormsewer calculations which verify the preservation of the pre-developed runoff rate and all storm sewer system capacities as part of the plans and specifications review process. 10. The developer shall obtain and comply with all conditions of the Watershed District. 11. Wood-fiber blankets or equivalent shall be used to stabilize all disturbed slopes greater than 3:1. 1 12. The developer shall be responsible for daily on and off-site cleanup caused by construction of this site. I 13. Park and trail fees shall be required at time of building permit application in lieu of parkland dedication. 14. Compliance with the conditions of Wetlands Alteration Permit No. 88-7. The final plat is consistent with the approved preliminary plat and the applicant has amended the plat in conformance with con- - ditions #1, #5 and #8. The additional conditions will be complied with as part of the development contract and building permit process. _ RECOMMENDATION I Staff recommends approval of the final plat for Ersbo Addition subject to the following conditions: I 1. A final landscaping plan shall be submitted as part of the development contract providing screening on the two double frontage lots adjacent to Lake Lucy Road. 2. The applicant shall enter into a development contract with the City and provide the City with the necessary financial sureties to guarantee proper installation of these public improvements. 3. The applicant shall pursue a utility easement across the par- cel to the east of the proposed plat such that a manhole located 20 feet south of Lake Lucy Road may be eliminated. 4. Drainage swales shall be provided between the proposed house pads and the upstream slopes to provide adequate drainage around and away from the house pads. I I Q (7) Don Ashworth I January 4, 1989 Page 3 5. The watermain shall be jacked under Lake Lucy Road. 6. The applicant shall exert all due care to minimize destruc- tion of Lake Lucy Road. All restoration on Lake Lucy Road shall be to the existing 9-ton road section specifications. ' 7. The applicant shall provide stormsewer calculations which verify the preservation of the pre-developed runoff rate and all storm sewer system capacities as part of the plans and specifications review process. ' 8. The developer shall obtain and comply with all conditions of the Watershed District. ' 9. Wood-fiber blankets or equivalent shall be used to stabilize all disturbed slopes greater than 3:1. I 10 . The developer shall be responsible for daily on and off-site cleanup caused by construction of this site. Ill. Park and trail fees shall be required at time of building permit application in lieu of parkland dedication. - 12. Compliance with the conditions of Wetlands Alteration Permit No. 88-7. ATTACHMENTS 1. Final Plat. - I 1 I r 1 I 11 I 0 mr A.4;4441-altioallirlinnMIE: '9 migek 411 iiin -cs<pisinfi , _ - 4°1.„i W" CM* s r �� � ..,' • i, W ' Mirk P R DV.t. p, 4 .s.4 • Ir.ii-o-re, 14 i „dm 1 . . rj. tip , own* rail T a e' -�k I. :-1- Bo miiplempteist7 Mk-1_1i- .... A 1. i)P- '' - 'ME" w Si TH VIM,T Ill - tit ram miiis' aim I ME ‘1:,,, mimpir■ANNIPIIMI ra (31:: Pv-IN 4" --t\-- -■ 177371. 1::.... 4.. 444-4,------ .- :us : IP 0 Fl ha 40- . .,-. ir, ' 44 " 4. -i 1 r II Ill N I-b. IF 100 gin III p, ..... :-... 111P9pr, A mr.. . LAKE LUCY B4-i7 ,; ' r ill RD pI 0. 514. •1Av . . - ` ei ■ , --" i;r„,. ... `A ��, Ai_I . i..-„ illiiiiiiIIIV;vaTili li fik$ k 1� 1 "" RS (: - LAKE ANN '.' i _ - RD%. , Z_. .. , ,,,,,, ,_....._.„.. .r. RR R4 R 1 sa Xi UM . .. R1 R12 2 • __ • • : • - �• =0U EVAR• ■ ,..:;- ■ • • t _ 1 City Council Meeting - June 13, 1988 a,. ..Richard trsbo, :1211 Lake Lucy Road:e. ' 1 '•-°Preliminary Plat-Approval to create -5 -single family lots. 1 2. Wetland Alteration Permit to develop within 200 feet of a Class A IIWetland. r. Reassign Conditional Use Permit, Jack Brambilla. 1 t. Approval of Accounts. u. City Council Minutes dated May 16, 1988 1 City Council Minutes dated May 23, 1988 Planning Commission Minutes dated May 18, 1988 Planning Commission Minutes dated June 1, 1988 ' Park and Recreation Commission Minutes dated May 24, 1988 Public Safety Commission Minutes dated May 19, 1988 - V. Resolution #88-55: Bluff Creek Roadway Improvements. IIAll voted in favor and the motion carried. IIRoger Knutson: Just one small correction. I don't think it's necessary to pull it but there's a typographical error in item 1(j) which our office prepared. On page 2 of that item, the first line refers to, in the road east of Mr. Hanson's 11 lot. It should be in the road west. I got my directions backwards. If you just want to note that one change. ' TH: Will Mr. Hanson be made aware of that change or already has been? Gary Warren: Yes. 1 CCVSENT AGENDA: E ( ) APPROVE DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR STRATFORD RIDGE ADDITIC)N, BOB PIERCE. - - IICouncilman Boyt: The only comment I have about this is on the tree removal plan and I'd like to see our development contract language changed to reflect this as II well. The applicant is required to submit a tree removal plan but it doesn't saying anything about the City having the ability to approve or disapprove of that plan and I would like to see the plan must meet approval by the City Engineer added to the language. IMayor Hamilton: That's item (k) so you want to add to that, the applicant should supply the City with a tree removal plan that will be approved by the City Engineer. Anybody have a problem with that? 1 Councilman Boyt moved, Councilman Geving seconded to approve the Development Contract for Stratford Ridge Addition with the noted changes. All voted in [E7 favor and the motion carried. 1 2 (- • 1. CITYOF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE• P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 11 (612) 937-1900 June 15, 1988 1 Mr. Richard Ersbo 1211 Lake Lucy Road Chanhassen, MN 55317 , and Mr. Willis Gilliard 516 Morgan Avenue No. Minneapolis, MN 55405 Dear Gentlemen: ' This is to confirm that the City Council at the June 13, 1988, meeting approved the subdivision request based on the plans stamped "Received April 19, 1988" and subject to the following conditions: 1. A berming and landscaping plan shall be submitted prior to final plat approval providing screening on the two double frontage lots adjacent to Lake Lucy Road. I 2. The applicant shall enter into a development contract with the City and provide the City with the necessary financial sureties-to guarantee proper installation of these public improvements. The applicant shall pursue a utility easement across the par- ' to t1ie` easrr13'f Iitat Iiich that -e-manhole located 20 feet- south of Lake Lucy Road may be eliminated. 4. Drainage swales shall be provided between the proposed house I pads and the upstream slopes to provide adequate drainage around and away from the house pads. 5. The applicant shall maintain the 50-foot right-of-way and driveway as shown in Attachment No. 3 until such time as the proposed north/south road is extended to the south as a public roadway. 6. The watermain shall be jacked under Lake Lucy Road. 11 1 June 15, 1988 Page 2 7. The applicant shall exert all due care to minimize destruc- tion of Lake Lucy Road. All restoration on Lake Lucy Road shall be to the existing 9-ton road section specifications. 8. Two 20-foot utility easements shall be provided as described previously in this report as part of the final plat review process. 9. The applicant shall provide stormsewer calculations which verify the preservation of the pre-developed runoff rate and all storm sewer system capacities as part of the plans and specifications review process. 10. The developer shall obtain and comply with all conditions of ' the Watershed District. 11. Wood-fiber blankets or equivalent shall be used to stabilize all disturbed slopes greater than 3:1. 12. The developer shall be responsible for daily on and off-site cleanup caused by construction of this site. 13. Park and trail fees shall be required at time of building permit application in lieu of parkland dedication. The Council also approved the wetland alteration permit request . based on the plans stamped "Received April 19, 1988" subject to the following conditions: ' 1. Creation of a stormwater retention pond on the northwest corner of Lot 1. 2. The applicant will work with staff to create a culvert drainage solution beyond the holding pond which is acceptable to the property owner to the west and to the city. - 3. Approval- of a permit from the Minnesota Department of Natural , Resources. 4. Compliance with the conditions of subdivision approval No. 87-36. The next step in the process is to execute a development contract with the city. The City Engineer prepares the development contract. Attached is an example of a contract. The development ' contract must be approved by the City Council. Upon execution of the development contract, the letter of credit and all other administrative fees must accompany the contract. Enclosed in ' this letter are two easement documents for dedication of the road easements to the east of the proposed cul-de-sac and along the I I ...D 1 June 15, 1988 Page 3 li western border of your property. Your surveyor will need to pre- pare a description for each of these easements. Also attached to II assist you in finalizing your project is a checklist to accomplish approval of the final plat, execution of the develop- ment contract and receiving plan and specification approval for the construction of the street and utilities. As we discussed at the Council meeting, the plan and specifica- tion review process will require preparation of the construction II plans ceritified by a registered civil engineer. These plans are the construction drawings that need to be approved by the Engineering Department as well as the City Council. I Please feel free to contact me regarding a meeting to review these steps so that you are fully aware of what is expected of you. , Should you have any questions please feel free to contact me. Si cere�, -� I 4 i Barbara Dacy II City Planner BD:v IIEnclosure II t 1 II II II 1 II I 1j - �''� n 1 , 2._, ... ---- - (7:' 1 T OF t_4C. DATE: May 18, 3988 `� CHANHASSEN C.C. DATE: June-3-3=--188 CASE NO:( 187-36 SUB/88-7 WA IIPrepared by: Dacy:k II - STAFF REPORT il PROPOSAL: 1. Preliminary plat approval to create 5 I single family lots. 2. Wetland Alteration Permit for development Ii within 200 feet of a Class A wetland V • LOCATION: South of and adjacent to Lake Lucy Road approximately 500 feet west of Powers Blvd. IIO_ APPLICANT: Richard Ersbo Willis Gillard Q 1211 Lake Lucy Road 516 Morgan Ave. North Chanhassen, MN 55317 Mpls. , MN 55405 1 , . Actin by Ctty Administrator 1 PRESENT ZONING: RSF, Single Family Residential Endorsed ` Al:;'78 k;oA t en II ACREAGE: 5.03 acres Re;actan na,_ G/21 r DENSITY: zk,. ADJACENT ZONING - _47/i rn AND LAND USE: N- RSF, Curry Farms Subdivision X1/3 ict , __ S- RR, Rural Residential II .4• 1 E- RSF, Single Family IQ W- RR, Rural Residential and Wetland I V. . WATER AND SEWER: Municipal services are available to the site. PHYSICAL CHARAC. : Topography slopes to the south and east, existing residence on the rear of the parcel. II2000 LAND USE PLAN: Low Density Residential II i-ji,p- _' j� -M 2 S O K \ �a ��� �- c ■ SM. anon EMMA 4 ling 10,i. e %IOW 11 :r.' . ,....ine,At I I pd.,voiCipAi III AM i ma m, 4/411..._• _ 41 IA. Piri emk. 11;,t, III mi MI ...... 1 1 11/4 ..g .v. Ilel; r OA imp I RE •2' irk% i 1 I P I •- 1 :01.01.•44 . 4 ma ,40 „,, , • ...1„,,,, , ,.. ., k 'AIWA, 1 te&un. 11161 71 It 111111111111,111123,111k111.M.-*.- 61/4‘ Ti 41 Iv- - A i - il'i° is s P ►gliTI - MI W. ST TH STREET I L1 1elil '° ti:; ti riI l/ .. ‘, •.`` k 1 , '`0lu k i✓ 1,/ 5 X11.1 t H.. w artAL. NI p, ..a :At le,yr,A1 7.01T_ r Min 1/41 LAKE LUCY Y y �� - 0.�� ,,,, RD ��� j lr No C: .r-• :rllll1�11N�N il ti W.*: is to \ J • altar, :' ��WIlI1L' iJ ,4`'aillP . ,-_,t \ �. 1 I o C, • LAKE ANN n D ., RSF RD 111. R• • R4 R1 ' � RR - R12 - . R12* - n ,,, 8ORE UM :OU EVA _ .... BG 1 {fit . i._ W ' Ersbo Subdivision/WAP May 18, 1988 Page 2 REFERRAL AGENCIES City Engineer Attachment #1 Fire Department Attachment #2 ' Building Department MnDNR No adverse comments Attachment #3 ' BACKGROUND The subject property was considered by the City Council for a similar preliminary plat in 1978. The request at that time was to create four lots in the front 300 feet of the property. The plat at that time did not include the existing residence. The City Council, on January 22, 1978, approved the preliminary plat request; however, because of lack of watermain to the area, the applicant did not pursue the subdivision. Because preliminary plat approval has expired, the applicant has resubmitted his application. In this application, staff requested that he ' include a lot for the existing residence. ANALYSIS IThe proposed lots meet the lot area, lot width, and lot frontage requirements for the RSF District. In preparing the street layout, the proposed street pattern was created so that minimizing conflict points on Lake Lucy Road could be minimized and the easements reserved for potential ' expansion to adjacent lots. Arlington Court, a cul-de-sac approved in the Curry Farms Subdivision, is located approximately 150 feet east of the proposed street entrance. This off-set is ' adequate and, in fact, it is a better street arrangement as it will minimize conflict points and turning movements entering both cul-de-sacs. Because each cul-de-sac serves a small number. of lots, there should not be a significant amount of traffic ' generated at these intersections during peak hour periods. As is noted on the plat, a 50 foot right-of-way is provided to l to the fifth parcel where the existing house is located. The 50 foot right-of-way can also be extended if needed for the parcel to the south by a proposed 50 foot easement. Creation of the 50 foot right-of-way gives the existing home street frontage. Therefore, the proposed plan not only accommodates both existing street and house arrangements, it accommodates potential sub- division patterns for adjacent properties. An application on the Kerber property to the east was received last year but was withdrawn by the applicant. Because this area near the Powers Boulevard intersection has several property ownerships it is necessary to preserve future street easements to discourage direct access of driveways to Lake Lucy Road. I Ersbo Subdivision/WAP Mk May 18, 1988 Page 3 The two lots abutting Lake Lucy Road are double frontage lots. The Subdivision Ordinance requires reservation of a ten foot screening easement. A berming and landscaping plan should be submitted to provide screening of these two rear yards. This screen should not extend into the area where a small stormwater pond is required to be created (see Engineering report) . RECOMMENDATION I Planning staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the following motion: I The Planning Commission recommends approval of Subdivision Request 4187-36 as shown on the plat stamped "Received April 19, 1988" subject to the following conditions: 1. A berming and landscaping plan shall be submitted prior to final plat approval providing screening on the two double frontage lots adjacent to Lake Lucy Road. 2. The applicant shall enter into a development contract with the City and provide the City with the necessary financial sureties to guarantee proper installation of these public improvements. 3. The applicant shall pursue a utility easement across the par- cel to the east of the proposed plat such that a manhole located 20 feet south of Lake Lucy Road may be eliminated. I 4. Drainage swales shall be provided between the proposed house pads and the upstream slopes to provide adequate drainage around and away from the house pads. 5. The applicant shall maintain the 50-foot right-of-way and driveway as shown in Attachment No. 3 until such time as the I proposed north/south road is extended to the south as a public roadway. 6. The watermain shall be jacked under Lake Lucy Road. I 7. The applicant shall exert all due care to minimize destruc- tion of Lake Lucy Road. All restoration on Lake Lucy Road shall be to the existing 9-ton road section specifications. 8. Two 20-foot utility easements shall be provided as described previously in this report as part of the final plat review process. 9. The applicant shall provide stormsewer calculations which I verify the preservation of the pre-developed runoff rate and all storm sewer system capacities as part of the plans and specifications review process. 1 I Ersbo Subdivision/WAP May 18, 1988 Page 4 10. The developer shall obtain and comply with all conditions of the Watershed District. ' 11. Wood-fiber blankets or equivalent shall be used to stabilize all disturbed slopes greater than 3:1. 12. The developer shall be responsible for daily on and off-site cleanup caused by construction of this site. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION 1 The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the request as recommended by staff. ' STAFF UPDATE The Park and Recreation Commission recommended that park and ' trail fees be accepted in lieu of parkland dedication. The Commission wanted to insure that enough room was retained within the street right-of-way for a trail if the street becomes a through street. The standard fifty foot right of way will be provided which does provide enough room if a trail is constructed. ' CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve Subdivision Request #87-36 as recommended by the Planning Commission and adding the following condition: ' 13. Park and trail fees shall be required at time of building permit application in lieu of parkland dedication. WETLAND ALTERATION REVIEW _ ANALYSIS The subject parcel is located adjacent to a Class A wetland. This wetland is also protected by DNR. The proposed development plan directs runoff from the street and rooftops to the northwest ' corner of the site and then discharges into the adjacent wetland. The engineering office has recommended that a pond be created in the northwest corner of Lot 1 to retain the runoff prior to discharging into the wetland. Although a small amount of runoff 1 - is being generated by the proposed development, the proposed pond location will help in stripping sediment from the runoff. Jim Leach from the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service inspected the site ' on May 13, 1988, and agreed that the pond should be created. He also recommended that site screens and hay bales be installed at the inlet and outlet to trap as much sediment as possible. I (") Ersbo Subdivision/WAP May 18, 1988 Page 5 Discharing of the runoff will occur across the adjacent property owner's land. A drainage easement should be obtained from the ' property owner prior to final plat approval to insure that the proposed drainage plan can be accommodated. DNR has notified staff that a permit will be required for , construction of the proposed discharge into the wetland. RECOMMENDATION , Planning staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the following motion: , "The Planning Commission recommends approval of Wetland Alteration Permit Request No. 88-7 as presented on the plans stamped "Received April 19, 1988" subject to the following conditions': 1. Creation of a stormwater retention pond on the northwest , corner of Lot 1. 2. Acquisition of a drainage easement from the adjacent property owner. 3. Approval of a permit from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 4. Compliance with the conditions of subdivision approval No. 87-36. ' PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the , request as recommended by staff except that condition #2 was amended as follows: 2. The applicant will work with staff to create a culvert drainage solution beyond the holding pond which is acceptable to the property owner to the west and to the city. I CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve Wetland ' Alteration Permit Request #88-7 as presented on the plat stamped "Received April 19, 1988" and subject to the following con- ditions: I 1. Creation of a stormwater retention pond on the northwest corner of Lot 1. ' 2. The applicant will work with staff to create a culvert drainage solution beyond the holding pond which is acceptable to the property owner to the west and to the city. Ersbo Subdivision/WAP May 18, 1988 Page 6 ' 3. Approval of a permit from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 11 4. Compliance with the conditions of subdivision approval No. 87-36. ATTACHMENTS 1. Memorandum from City Engineer dated May 12, 1988. 2. Memorandum from Steve Madden dated May 5, 1988. ' 3. Comments from DNR. 4. Application. 5. Detailed location map showing location of Arlington Court and Devonshire Drive. 6. Area map showing potential future street alignments. 7. Planning Commission minutes dated September 27, 1978. 8. City Council minutes dated January 22, 1979. ' 9. Mmo from Lori Sietsema dated May 16, 1988. 10. Park and Recreation Commission minutes dated May 10, 1988. 11 Planning Commission minutes dated May 18, 1988. 12. Preliminary Plat stamped "Received April 19, 1988". • I 1 i • . • _ • . .. - • ci t _ II 4 .1 CITY OF . :i. .. -, A.r. \.,_.,, , ..r , ,. 7 , f _...„..,=. ) CHANHASSEN 1 . . : . ----.7 ---.0 ,' 14 = 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 MEMORANDUM 1 TO: - Planning Commission FROM: Larry Brown, Staff Engineer I 47/1- DATE: May 12, 1988 SUBJ: Preliminary Plat Review for Ersbo Subdivision , Planning File No. 87-36, Ersbo II This site is located on the south side of Lake Lucy approxi- mately Road a r x'o 1 mately 500 feet west of County State Aid Highway 17. The five- acre site is comprised of an open -rolling field with an existing II home located on the southerly portion of the site. Sanitary Sewer = I Municipal sanitary sewer is available to the site by an existing 8-inch sanitary sewer line which has been installed from CSAH 17 II to 450 feet west on Lake Lucy Road. at is recommended that the applicant pursue a 10-foot utility easement across a portion of the property to the east such that the manhole located 20 feet south of Lake Lucy Road may be eliminated (refer to Attachment I No. 1). The depth of the proposed sanitary sewer in the proposed cul-de- ' sac is approximately 6 feet deep. Those portions of the sanitary sewer which have less than 8 feet of cover shall be properly insulated. A II 20 foot utility easement should be provided along the easterly property boundaries of the two easterly lots to facilitate possible future development. Similarly, a 20-foot utility ease- II ment should be provided along the common lot line of the two southerly lots to facilitate future development to the north (refer to Attachment No. 2A, B, and C) . I Watermain Municipal water service is also available to the site by an I 18-inch watermain which exists along the north side of Lake Lucy Road. The plan does propose a 300-foot dead-end watermain. Although this is typically avoided wherever possible, location of II I II ( ) {fir : Planning Commission May 12, 1988 Page 2 the existing watermains do not lend themselves to looping of the watermain until future development to the west occurs. The por- tion of the porposed 6-inch watermain underneath Lake Lucy Road should be jacked underneath the roadbed to minimize the destruc- tion of the newly-constructed Lake Lucy Road. ' Roadway The plans propose a cul-de-sac which has a proposed street grade of 6.5 percent as compared to the City' s recommended maximum of 7.0 percent. The proposed right-of-way is 50 feet in width which is consistent with the City's standards for urban construction. ' The plat also prqposes 50-foot right-of-ways to the north and east of the entryway and bubble respectively. This will facili- tate access to the east and north without incurring any addi- tional connections onto Lake Lucy Road which is a collector street. It is recommended that the 50-foot right-of-way located 11 on the westerly property boundary of the southwest lot ( refer to Attachment No. 3) should be maintained by the applicant until such time as development occurs south of the plat. ' Grading and Drainage The proposed grading plan calls for cutting down of a portion of ' the hillside located to the southerly two lots. Maximum cut areas are approximately 8 feet to the south, while fill depths have been kept to approximately 3 feet. ' it is recommended that drainage swales be constructed between all the house pads and the upstream sides of the lots to help direct drainage around and away from the proposed house pads. ' Drainage from the development is directed to the west via the proposed storm sewer system and eventually in the existing ' wetland located to the west. The proposed plan maintains the natural drainage path. The plans do not address on-site ponding and will need to be revised as per the Watershed District 's recommendations as well as the Department of Natural Resources ' (DNR) . The proposed plan shows the storm sewer pipe extended onto the neighboring property to the west. The plans should be revised, or the applicant shall provide the City with the appropriate easement documents prior to the final plat review. Erosion Control The plans do not address erosion control. Therefore, an erosion control plan should be submitted to the City for approval as part of the plans and specifications review process. I . , • . . • C' Planning Commission May 12, 1988 Page 3 Recommended Conditions 1. The applicant shall enter into a development contract with I the City and provide the City with the necessary financial sureties to guarantee proper installation of these public improvements. I 2. The applicant shall pursue a utility easement across the par- cel to the east of the proposed plat such that a manhole located 20 feet south of Lake Lucy Road may be eliminated. 3. Drainage swales shall be provided between the proposed house pads and the upstream slopes to provide adequate drainage 1 around and away from the house pads. 4. The applicant shall maintain the 50-foot right-of-way and ' driveway as shown in Attachment No. 3 until such time as the proposed north/south road is extended to the south as a public roadway. 5. The watermain shall be jacked under Lake Lucy Road. 6. The applicant shall exert all due care to minimize destruc- tion of Lake Lucy Road. All restoration on Lake Lucy Road shall be to the existing 9-ton road section specifications. 7. Two 20-foot utility easements shall be provided as described i previously in this report as part of the final plat review process. 8. The applicant shall provide stormsewer calculations which verify the preservation of the pre-developed runoff rate and all storm sewer system capacities as part of the plans and specifications review process. 9. The developer shall obtain and comply with all conditions of the Watershed District. 10. Wood-fiber blankets or equivalent shall be used to stabilize all disturbed slopes greater than 3:1. 1 11. The developer shall be responsible for daily on and off-site cleanup caused by construction of this site. 1 Attachments 1. Sanitary Sewer Diagram ' 2. Easement Diagrams (A, B & C) 3. Right-of-Way Diagram I '' d(11' - L ?s W - E7c1ST/ C� h{�fi �� 46 �°) 6)4 ce• i 11 J ` `. c ��499.2 ----= INv= 98t.oE \T�` - � _ REMOVE MHO iklq s 4. lip:;12-—'''' ./ . s• 1 1 • ; i. • i 1 , Y1 I tor Di i- 1 . !� r[/ itk5 t. S 1 0 4' it / . 0•3••••••• 1 . 1 I 1 I xi:/° ! A . 1 IP e, 6 f� . I `� / \ /• 1% ! ; II . ; . t t. . • ...)...---=-07-7 / II ' 40,ti . /v46- rt° ;i < < goo V.. - • A A ..• ,. • 4 :! -.-V& ::. . "....,tyn I 1 .,. - •- i - • • LI: c' • M if \ ; • 41;I liri 11 I lar-AI Ilk- 1 011 r J + 1 / 1Ph-Al kivi? . - -- -- , , , L -, i ,.,--- -.,i r , ler :. '-',7 ‘.. 4 r .50‘ 1.-- . -,. r �. � re ` ate �'�0 Jy/ ' a ; • • 1, / , % Y• { v�' /'(ice t, � � , ,. � �Q� :I- / • • EX\:-////r‘ . / . 9:. /, .\\,- : _ "2 _ __,..,..', V 7:..\ Z ...„,,. 714°. "1".1.$) ...1 _ __ •--- _ ., ...... ,.. z , , A' _____>. . -.......;; . . t. i • . _ 1 k ,,, ,, _ 0 j /‘1571 - , ON. . -tk, / i le A 4 ... V 1 ., • .. • 0 Pr . / ) I . - • :',00° , / . 1 • / 1 • / . / 4■, 7/ • . - A ,t" ... ;,, !%lb - • /4000;00000100 . AA' - , ........ ■ .........;C 1 • 1 ts ../.:...., . . "... / i; 1. ! 4 • . ! , • , 0 v: . , • „• •••0' ' i • i ......., 1 I . .a. 0 . ..\-.• .......” .(II \- "-- ----------:\i / ---- 11:41b1. ,7,-•.? _ 4 .i i ..0 CV ........•2..7. T . Lis isc. ..,\ ......... /- . ./...... ■■,,,„1: .../ I ....,' : / „‘iii•Nost, ii / t • . .„1/ 1- .•,.< . • . '.-, , • , IP / 4" ''' 7 • \ C491V' - :°,1_,. .:, AP' /K.I.:7;1:411r;:. i:41144:%:41)41:: ' 1 t ' 'qV - .1 1049 .. • A /, I..;,.'.;4■:". .t1:1:;..:•..1 1:.:..1.4„/s 4 . /V: . j.(• A_ > . / ....... vis■ J., , d#1, r. AL VIIP4 JUL. •11(11 ..? 1 .....\ - ---,/ , .-- : .., •., , . .. , t„. 1 ict, : .. _ .., , . , . • k, ,..„ ,. : • .. , i . ,,,,„-..„: : vim . N . .."‘" • /7/::).-•-•,\-- --- - 4, i / , ' 4.'''‘.. e..'\ .......- "P. • .... 4• 1. .... . ,' / ' .;/ %- , -- .......-- ;I.__ ,. ...2 1 ....,,,. ----' 4. . )•i . i\ - . f , " 2b. rr.-E-Al MEN . r . ... ..• ■ . si . OL • . . / :... iiminimmummulii 1 ' , C01° 164/; i ••••••"."1 .. ...-.- /41 I DCO d v . ...__ • ., et! . ... 11! ....- i _........ ..........., .....iggidgeg lip, . I 41111)C\/ eh 11111MIIM - -... • • - ‘ ■ \ Il . • . . . I . . . •I . -- 2 I e.,...s Z ye.% • 40 .3 1 • I I . * . I . 1 .... • -•Aw 1 r.) CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 ' MEMORANDUM TO: Barbara Dacy, City Planner ' FROM: Steve Madden, Fire Inspector4"-- ' DATE: May 5, 1988 SUBJ: Ersbo, Subdivision Request 87-36 and Wetland Alteration Permit No. 88-7 I Upon review of the site plan for Ersbo, I request a turnaround area on the main street entering•;the area (Uniform Fire Code, Division II, Section 10.207[A] ) . If you have any questions, please contact me. 1 1 1 1 I City of Chanhassen C' 690 Coulter Drive, P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 II (612)937-1900 Date: May 2, 1988 I To: Development Plan Referral Agencies From: Planning Department By: Barbara Dacy, City Planner 1 Subject: Preliminary plat and wetland alteration permit request to create 5 single family lots on 5 acres located south of and adjacent to Lake II Lucy Red opposite Curry Farms subdivision Planning Case: 87-36 SUB and 88-7 WAP (Ersbo) I The above described application for approval 'of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department on April 25, 1988 . In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning I anning CorrYnission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and pro- posed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a II written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. This application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanhassen Planning I Commission on May 18, 1988 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than Mav 11, 1988 . You may also appear at the Planning Commission II meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. I VCity Departments MN Dept. of Natural Resources IIad? City Engineer Telephone Company b. City Attorney (NW Bell or United) c City lictor I Pubc Park Safety DireDirector 9. Electric Company v Building Inspector g (NSP or MN Valley) ^on Watershed District Engineer II ;�� 9 10. DOWDEN Cable System (3. Soil Conservation Service 11. Roger Machmeier/Jim Anderson 4. MN Dept. of Transportation 12. U. S. Fish and Wildlife CIME D 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 13. Carver County Engineer ;�?� ; 138P, �l 6,/ Minnegasco 14. REGION VI �v..'74. ( a.C•0%. / 040 /0.-- /3/ // Other WATERS 170 SAore 4., Go�cer•? /Yo T70Oa4' �. -av�cP�r�rj Eros•ems-■ Curl,T�`0 /0�'° a 1../-"C-W — S y 4.,ce 1 ele• — .S'}sr—..., r .94-4. ..,ee di sO N/ Put 1 ,( W /ell f I -- 44 AY/ 041cJ 0 4 /0— /3/w Z.3 ! �' LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION I CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 Coulter Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 I (612) 937-1900 -444:z--6-4A--k----- APPLICANT: :J7I-CliCe/O C. /F-x):5 & ) OWNER: IADDRESS /1 // 4 Gc c'j 21,( Rr . ADDRESS I 3(4-07-.97z_Zip Code - Zip Code TELEPHONE (Daytime) TELEPHONE 7 y—� REQUEST: I Zoning District Change Planned Unit Development I Zoning Appeal Sketch Plan Preliminary Plan Zoning Variance Final Plan 1 Zoning Text Amendment Subdivision Land Use Plan Amendment • Platting I . Metes and Bounds Conditional Use Permit Street/Easement Vacation I Site Plan Review Wetlands Permit PROJECT NAME I PRESENT LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION , REQUESTED LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION ,, / PRESENT ZONING ___1(4S7:7 IREQUESTED ZONING S . USES PROPOSED 5,;(j.9 '' 44,t44„A4, i f .fix II SIZE OF PROPERTY j. L. ILOCATION . REASONS FOR THIS REQUEST I LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Attach legal if necessary) • City of Chanhassen Land Development Application Page 2 FILING INSTRUCTIONS: This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the City Planner to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. FILING CERTIFICATION: The undersigned representative of the applicant hereby certifies that he is familiar with the procedural requirements of all applicable City Ordinances Signed B I y Date Applicant . - e undersigned hereby certifies that the applicant has been II Th authorized to make this application for the property herein described. -› -Signed By _ L) C• fi 41Zr Date / ' -6-Jj Fee Owner 11 Date Application Received 10 1 (0 8 7 Application Fee Paid cP-S--0 1 City Receipt No. * This Application will be considered by the Planning Commission/ , Board of Adjustments and Appeals at their meeting. - €� #f�., . 1 .. y91 0' Z of op W t4 X)ST)xl4 A[t . _ L/ % °19 9� poi �wJI .�— —I — _Y —)=a -�— Y=— 1- 1 .' / t nk)L -1L- At , ♦ . ♦ rt.-M.% I 1 L'i , , I % 1 I • 1.:,1, 5'") i 1.........„j)I ) .. ik , cet i ryt. - , , . , 1 u‘...././.'• 2. . ,a, ' :„./. , ..,,lc, ..., 0 v(tV 401'4.11/ IN I f ,........•Pqq(;\: . 1 1 I f • I 1 0 , 4., v, , . , •., , \,/ .....„.„.........7 •4 i....--L, 1 JJ ( i 1 r‘i is � � f' 9 '�' -- I �% / 4 lailak If • i I a.::-i4i ..... .I;1. U • II "mm. fir a. ..... , I •s f ` -NA §�#4- . .' 1 _■ - a et I t i I v 1 01 . . ..... � \ �B•%•,,.••••t•-• . --.4%--7?\-- .. \• /' t D fir/ / !% • x--r, , 7 . ,t, •,.. . ..... , ... ... , , . 1 lit. -----"_,,, . t , - 0 / /if:pr-,, - , , ,,/,',- , „........, „•;;;.,„, • I • 4 0.- 1 ., _.,..,...1 ,,, ,,• . .,:. - A-7D ,,,, ,/ ti 4 • A, 0 ' I I4, lS .I I •I • , I \ ` • I . • I ♦ i I I I ... ...• "I`± - - 5 --- O.. - 6 2MIN ` T'- K* * • o f et- ' 10• 1 `rf '; .x. i.i.i 1T -- _1 � " I. , 7; : '.r' - ''C 1-,!:. 14 '< 19 , _ .:.- . (L e(i� I 4 to f N COURT 41 c� / `:::4":1::::;. ..;: .4.,::.'t-a .. + �� . I ' " 15 i ;.a. r.. .t.. • •,0 (vowed BLACKSTAO I 1.;z: lc 5 5 , 0 33 HELEN ADDITION 1 I � •,'- «: - w - .- o c 1- JACQUES �� J,0 1 � z 5 1 4 :� 7 g 3 I 5°15°' t� -TTVR1*" 77--- ______r_ 7_,_____ i In I i' f 1 err°N\4.3 I - i t, L 4 us• JOHN CLARK FFt!~-1�"•-' I • BKIOi,P2it r r• /7/7.<- �r--w 12 , x.• Y lal .F- O r 4J- i . �FI•_.O • Tr-� ° V' �r w�� 1 Z^ 43r- >a 1 WY �� l • Q d ; >Zt a J ; i�s �5/•E'NE DOAH CIRCLE'��li sA �me .;-190 ,01 _ Pt RL. PETERSON 1 ,l 2I c ill .. .,- BK 97,P 3I9: C iii ^� • . RICHARD ORTEtIBLAD _ - N '8`tlo` . • BK 117 P175 -• °c°i 'F Itlax. \\ \ \ \ \ E •�,ryz� • —215 Yf • .._ o 1usi- •a V4 In JAMES C. RAVIS t f • ___ BK 144,P RS 1 r-•—� • • 150 ilee7 - ! CARV . SYLVESTER TRUTNAU • •� OK 140, P 103 SO r� - - O r • M j d J I LEWIS A. WOITALLA o. • Z . • 27 AY OR 0 !iR • h 2 w .1.1;,.::.,,,j'::- ` - -5 , - oglia 1110 ,4414 Ct aim k .:7-.;41,-, _ ry 1T • '— •' m / . ... ..04; iN :;I-, 14. 'r • 19 4 -..:: , ' _ : 1_. 4` (.7 11111117.ON COURT : •! ! ∎. ''` ' - �,j t 15 �' i� . 01: y: : 1 413mr.0. 11w .,.. t I . ii .• p (Vacated BLACKSTAD '' f I Mil I! C, a HELEN ADDITION 11,1;;T‘,S... /1'1: p 5,, c 1 JACQUES , i ' .0,0 32 z �5� p•• 4 •r' 7 s. i O 1 2 3 50 50 � ktuit 1 ,Z I ii - th M NI , i . c,:. in. ;S7R 1r ffi ' I , ■ ' JOHN CLAR1� }:, ti 914104,R 2!4 �'' '" ''T' `' d� r N r , �o T1f149 A . =a I z° g;r i 1 iii I CIRCLE _ ■ 3--190kalENENDOAH X01 or t t- I . R.L. PETERSON I '`r •: BK97,P319; c � n . RICHARD ORTE(JBLAD _ N ';�r '�� • BK H7, P 175 =�dJ X 10 � xC \\ \ \ \ \GEn,- A Q i I '. ..�_» 215 ��<�bLL I' ` w a . 1 1'`� a JAMES C. RAVI3 ./... C- �- I , $K$44,R!6 t r- w 1 I i • r er-.0► 150 .Tye; CARVER SYLVESTER TRUTNAUI `I.11. - 911140, P. 103 r� , Mr s30 i . o, -• i 28 I I LEWIS A. WOITALLA, a► ' Z . 2 g ev OK n wee h 27 C I f 41-:.? ,,• CITY OF ...., ,A2,_, ,:,.. .., .,,,:,, . . ., , 1 r 1 CHANHASSEN 1 ,.:,, ,,,. :, _ _ „ ; • _ _4,..„,„,, ,, 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 II MEMORANDUM I TO: Barbara Dacy, City Planner I FROM: Lori Sietsema, Park and Recreation Coordinator DATE: May 16, 1988 II SUBJ: Park and Recreation Commission Action on Ersbo Addition The Park and Recreation Commission reviewed the Ersbo Addition proposal at their May 9th meeting. The Comprehensive Plan does not call for park land in this area and trails are in place along Lake Lucy Road. The Commission felt the City should retain enough room within the I street right-of-way of the cul-de-sac for an off street trail in the event that it becomes a through street. The Commission unanimously recommended that park and trail dedication fees be II accepted in lieu of park land and trail construction. . 1 II I I I I I oi I (7) • Park and Recreation Commission May 10, 1988 - Page 2 IC ' REVIEW SITE PLAN FOR ERSBO ADDITION. Hoffman: This is a proposal for a subdivision of a 5 acre site into 5 single family lots. It's located south and adjacent to Lake Lucy Road opposite the new Curry Farms development. The applicant is Richard Ersbo. Present zoning, residential single family. It's 5 acres again and you can see the adjacent zoning there. Existing parks currently serving this area ' are Curry Farms Park which is under development at this time and Carver Beach Playground which is existing. An on-street bike trail is located on both sides of Lake Lucy Road abutting this proposal. The Comprehensive Plan does not call for additional parkland in this area. Recommendation, this is a small subdivision with lies within the service area of existing parks and on-street trails exist along Lake Lucy Road. Therefore, it is the recommendation of this office to accept park and trail dedication fees ' in lieu of land and trail construction. With this map you can see exactly what they're proposing. Lake Lucy Road, Curry Farms development is back over in this area. The existing home and road comes in down here and the ' existing home is in this area. What they are proposing is to subdivide this whole acreage into 5 lots and put 4 new ones coming in with a cul-de-sac. Lake Lucy Road has the on-street trail on both sides. Curry Farms is over here and then Carver Beach Playground is over here. Schroers: Would the access then be off of Lake Lucy Road or off of the IC existing road? • ' Hoffman: The access right here would be off of the existing right-of-way. So the access to these homes would be off Lake Lucy. ' Schroers: Okay, but it comes in along what would be the west side there and then goes in? ' Hoffman: Correct. It comes in and the existing road is shown here. Hasek: Todd, what's the potential of any development happening south of ' that? Is that one right on Lake Lucy? Hoffman: No it's not. Hasek: But there is land to the south of that? Hoffman: I'm not sure if there's a blow-up of that area on there or not. Yes, it shows it on there. Hasek: There's potential that there could be development behind them ' then? Mady: Also, is that a pond or is that more of a slough right there? I Hoffman: It's a marshy area. It's not really a pond. Lowland area. It's probably a foot to 2 feet deep at the deepest. Hasek: What I 'm thinking is the possibility that maybe at some point that land behind there might be developed and this might become part of a loop . • % . • . . C 1 Park and Recreation Commission May 10, 1988 - Page 3 1 C road that might go through there. Maybe there's a loop road that does something like that. Maybe what we should do is take an easement along one side or the other of that road. Hoffman: If this has the potential of continuing through? Hasek: Yes. Through and down and actually coming back onto Lake Lucy Road at some point or over to Powers Blvd. . I don't know if it would ever -' get through there but it might come back. I really believe that if it ever did develop, it would probably go right back onto Lake Lucy Road to the north so maybe it ought to be looked at with the potential of an easement by staff on either one side or the other and I guess I'd like to make a motion that staff take a closer look at the potential for development of land surrounding this and the possibility of a trail easement along one side or the other of the north/south road into this project. Hoffman: I do not have the information on the potential for additional development there to the south. Hasek: I think you can see though that there's a fairly substantial ' amount of land that might want to be developed. He does show an access going to his property and he may want, at some point in the future connect to something else. Hoffman: Yes, because it's kind of a dead-end piece there that you're probably not going to get access off of Powers Blvd. real easily. , Mady: One of those lots is the lot that . . .owns. Schroers: They have a lot but I think that the property that I know that Klingelhutz pointed out to me that he owned was much further down Lake Lucy Road. In fact over towards CR 117 where they're proposing coming through with that boat access. I just have a question, Ed did -your II motion, to accept the recommendation as it is but then to add checking in on the easement?. Hasek: •I think rather than make a motion on the suggestions by staff, I just simply said that maybe it needs to be looked at a little bit more closely and it ought to come back before us. It might be something that was skipped. If we take cash in lieu of and trails. ' Schroers: That's what I was wondering. If you're directing staff to do that then it's not written in the motion. ' Hasek: Let's go with staff's recommendations and also to ask them to investigate as indicated in the motion. Hasek moved, Mady seconded that the Park and Recreation Commission recommend to accept park and trail dedication fees in lieu of parkland and trail construction and directing staff to take a closer look at the potential for development of land surrounding this subdivision and the I II ' Park and Recreation Commission May 10, 1988 - Page 4 C possibility of a trail easement along one side or the other of the I north/south road into this project. All voted in favor and motion carried. IIREVIEW SITE PLAN FOR DEVELOPMENT SITES LIMITED. - II Hoffman: Item 4, a subdivision of 11 acres into 5 industrial lots. The location of this one is west of and adjacent to Audubon Road and north of the railroad tracks. Present zoning is A-2, Agricultural Estate and I Industrial Office Park acreage is 11.09 acres. Adjacent zoning and land use is stated there. Existing parks, there are no parks in the immediate area however, this area is served by Lake Ann and Lake Susan parks. Lake Ann is real close and used quite extensively by the industrial park II already. Comprehensive Plan, the Comp Plan does not call for parks in this area. The Comp Trail plan calls for an off-street trail along Audubon Road. Background of this proposal, this proposed development lies I at the west end of the industrial park and is part of Zone 4 on the recreation section in the Comprehensive Plan. Zone 4 calls for parkland to serve the development needs of development taking place along TH 101 and around Lake Susan. As the needs of this area are being met with the parkland dedication of Lake Susan Hills West and Chanhassen Hills, parkland is not needed from the proposed Audubon West development. The trail plan identifies a need for a trail along Audubon Road which we have I requested a trail easement along the west side from developments both north and south of this proposal being the McGlynn development and then the Graham property to the south. This alignment should be continued. I It's the recommendation of this office to accept park and trail dedication fees in lieu of parkland and trail construction and to request a 20 foot trail easement along the west side of Audubon Road. IIHasek moved, Schroers seconded that the Park and Recreation Commission recommend to accept park and trail dedication fees in lieu of parkland and I trail construction and to request a 20 foot trail easement along the west side of Audubon Road. All voted in favor and motion carried. IIREVIEW REQUEST TO RELOCATE TRAIL EASEMENT, HIDDEN VALLEY. Hoffman: Recently the City was contacted by United Mortgage Corporation II requesting that the City consider realigning the trail easement through the Hidden Valley development located just west of Chanhassen Estates along the south side of Lake Drive East and the east side of TH 101. You II all know where this area is. The area down behind McDonalds. Over here is Chanhassen Estates. The easement that is in question, originally the trail was located along the utility easement. This would be Rice Marsh Lake with all the wetland in this area. Those people came in requesting I that that trail easement be moved farther south to get it out of those people's backyards as far as possible without trying to get into the wet area. What Lori sent back to them was as long as we took that easement to IIput the trail on there because it's already all platted, if you go ahead I . . y . , . Planning Commission Meeting May 18, 1988 - Page 11 PUBLIC HEARING: , RICHARD ERSBO, 1211 LAKE LUCY ROAD, PROPERTY ZONED RSF, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND LOCATED SOUTH OF AND ADJACENT TO LAKE LUCY ROAD: A. PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL TO CREATE FIVE SINGLE FAMILY LOTS. B. WETLAND ALTERATION PERMIT TO DEVELOP WITHIN 200 FEET OF A CLASS A WETLAND. The staff report was waived as there was no public present besides the applicant. Emmings: Have you seen the conditions that the staff has put on this? ' Richard Ersbo: Yes. Emmings: Do you have any problems with those conditions? , Richard Ersbo: No. Emmings: Do you have anything you'd like to add to the staff I presentation? Richard Ersbo: No. I Erhart moved, Ellson seconded to close the public hearing. All voted in favor and motion carried. The public hearing was closed. Batzli: I guess I'd like to recommend that we include the staff report by I reference into our Minutes of the meeting here since we get the staff report on record. I didn't have a whole lot of questions. I thought the conditions were appropriate except for this one storm water retention pond. Were we going to talk about the within 200 feet of a wetland? Since we're talking about storm water retention ponds, I guess I was kind of curious as to exactly where that was going to be. Dacy: That's going to be located in the northwest corner of this lot right in here. Batzli: Is that going to be similar to the one we talked about last time? II Dacy: No, this is much bigger in scale and character. It's much smaller than that one. I Brown: As a matter of fact, staff had originally looked at not having storm water retention pond simply for the fact that the increase in run- off due to the rooftops of the homes due to the cul-de-sac really wasn' t adding a whole lot of additional flow. However, on the other side of the coin obviously we can' t ignore the sedimentation process that occurs in a holding pond before discharging out into the wetland. The pond is going 11 to be very minimal in size. More to answer the question, I don't know at • ( ' • Planning Commission Meeting May 18, 1988 - Page 12 this point, something we can cover through the plans and specs phase of it ' but it's going to be very minimal at best. We had to at least extend the courtesy to the Watershed District since they're in charge of evaluating water quality. IBatzli: That part I guess that I didn't get yet is that your requirement that they receive a drainage easement from the adjacent property owner. ' Where's adjacent? Which one? Brown: That would be to the east. Batzli : But in your report you say the drainage is directed to the west so you're saying -that instead of directing it. . . ' Dacy: He's right. It's west. It's the easement going into the wetland from the culvert. It's on the west side. Batzli : I'm confused now. You're draining things to the west correct? Brown: Correct. ' Batzli: So your acquisition of a drainage easement is to the east? Brown: There are two easements in question here. Number one, the ' easement to the east is strictly, it states in condition 3 that the applicant shall pursue a utility easement. It has nothing to do with the drainage and our motive for that. . . ' Batzli : I'm in agreement with your utility easement. I've only been talking about the within 200 feet of a Class A wetland. Who do you want to get at the drainage easement from? ' Erhart: Doesn't that property drain through there now? Brown: The property does drain through there now but the applicant has shown on their plans, since this is the property boundary line here, over here this parcel is owned by Mr. Ordenblad and this pipe is shown extending onto his property and therefore the applicant again has the ' responsibility of providing the City with either some sort of easement document or revising his plans such that his pipe stops here at the property boundary. No way that he can extend that pipe into somebody elses property. Batzli : He's got a culvert going under the road then? .I Brown: Yes. Batzli : So that's going to drain his holding pond into the next door neighbor's property? Brown: Correct. Dacy: Into the wetland. - Planning Commission Meeting May 18, 1988 - Page 13 Brown: Into the wetland. However, it will be at the predevelopment runoff rate. Batzli: So you want the easement just because the pipe sticks out of the I property a little bit? Brown: If the applicant wants to pursue that, yes. We would like to have II that pipe extend out to the edge of the wetland. However, if it comes down to a hard situation and they can't reach an agreement, then we're certainly willing to look at a revision of this plan. ' Wildermuth: It looks like the easement requires about 30 feet. Brown: Correct. I Batzli : I guess I would like to clarify what we're trying to do there. I would rather make a strong recommendation that we would like to see that it goes to a certain point and he work with staff or the adjacent property II owners. That's it. Wildermuth: I agree with Brian that we should word that just a little bit I differently. Other than that, I have no other questions. It looks like the staff report all of the requirements for the subdivision are satisfied. Ellson: Nothing here. It looks fine. Erhart: That's the only thing I had was again, I think we should change item 2 to basically say to work with staff to create a drainage solution that will be acceptable to both the City. Otherwise I think it's great. , Emmings: I don't have anything either. . .so is there a motion on this? Ellson moved, Wildermuth seconded that the Planning Commission recommend approval of Subdivision Request 187-36 as shown on the plat stamped "Received April 19, 1988" subject to the following conditions: , 1. A berming and landscaping plan shall be submitted prior to final plat approval providing screening on the two double frontage lots adjacent to Lake Lucy Road. 2. The applicant shall enter into a development contract with the City and provide the City with the necessary financial sureties to I guarantee proper installation of these public improvement. 3. The applicant shall pursue a utility easement across the parcel to the II east of the proposed plat such that a manhole located 20 feet south of Lake Lucy Road may be eliminated. 4. Drainage swales shall be provided between the proposed house pads and 11 the upstream slopes to provide adequate drainage around and away from I r Planning Commission Meeting ' ' May 18, 1988 - Page 14 ' the house pads. 5. The applicant shall maintain the 50 foot right-of-way and driveway as ' shown in Attachment No. 3 until such time as the proposed north/south road is extended to the south as a public roadway. 6. The watermain shall be jacked under Lake Lucy Road. ' 7. The applicant shall exert all due care to minimize destruction of Lake Lucy Road. All restoration on Lake Lucy Road shall be to the existing ' 9 ton section specifications. 8. Two 20 foot utility easements shall be provided as described ' previously in this report as part of the final plat review process. 9. The applicant shall provide stormsewer calculations which verify the preservation of the pre-developed runoff rate and all storm sewer ' capacities as part of the plans and specifications review process . 10. The developer shall obtain and comply with all conditions of the ' Watershed District. 11. Wood-fiber blankets or equivalent shall be used to stabilize all disturbed slopes greater than 3:1. ' 12. The developer shall be responsible for daily on and off-site cleanup caused by construction of this site. IAll voted in favor and motion carried. Erhart moved, Batzli seconded that the Planning Commission recommend approval of Wetland Alteration Permit Request #88-7 as presented on the plans stamped "Received April 19, 1988" subject to the following ' conditions: 1. Creation of a stormwater retention pond on the northwest corner of ' Lot 1. 2. The applicant will work with staff to create a culvert drainage ' solution beyond the holding pond which is acceptable to the property owner to the west and to the City. 3. Approval of a permit from the Minnesota Department of Natural ' Resources. 4. Compliance with the conditions of subdivision approval No. 87-36. All voted in favor and motion carried. I . . -Planning Commissifl Meeting September 27, 19 -6- That would give us an opportunity to go to Council and talk to them about the proposal and what we are trying to do and get an idea as to whether it would fly. Members were polled as to their feelings on recommending the Council rescind the resolution. 11 Dick Matthews - With the lakes there it should have sewer. Tim Stone - I think there are a variety of other planning considerations besides the financial base of the city that come into play here and I have to swing with Dick, I feel uncomfortabli concerning this project. Jerry Neher - I would like to see it postponed until such time as the sewer is imminent. Hud Hollenback - I agree. Walter Thompson - I'll agree. Roman Roos - It is pretty much unanimous on the resolution. We would _. postpone any-further action until there is some status of the sewer. That would be the recommendation of the Planning Commission to the Council. , Bob Waibel - In all fairness to the developers, that 911721 applies only to planned unit developments. There is a possible alternative route where they ask for rezoning to a subdivision classification. In other words they drop below the 24 lot minimum threshold for the planned unit development. That would involve- another rezoning in the unsewered area. SKETCH PLAN - RICHARD ERSBO: Mr. Ersbo is proposing to subdivide approximately 1.5 acres into four lots . The property is located on the south side of Lake Lucy Road and is zoned R-1A. All of the lots shown are deficient in lot area. Bill Brezinsky - He has shown a 60 foot right-of-way coming into the property. , That can be reduced to 50 feet. Although the Subdivision Ordinance does require a 60 foot in right-of-way radius for the cul-de-sac, this is such a short cul-de-sac that we would recommend that a variance be given to reduce that to a 50 foot • radius. The lots are under 15,000 square feet. We feel with this reduction in the width of the right-of-way and by shifting the lot lines between Lots 1 and 2,and 3 and 4 to the south he will be able to pick up four lots that'have 15,000 square feet in area. As far as the status of Lake Lucy Road, our indication) are that the most right-of-way that will be needed in the future is 80 feet. Right now there is 66 feet. We would recommend that they dedicate a seven II foot right-of-way easement on the north side of Lots 1 and 4. Hud Hollenback moved to hold a public' hearing on October 25, 1978 , to consider the Ersbo subdivision request. Motion seconded by Tim Stone and unanimously approved. , 7?)611Ff=77 ' 'Planning Commissi _Meeting October 25, 19780 -4- Roy Berke - In talking to all of the people I have always stated that if I am a problem I would like you to tell me so that we • ' can work together to eliminate the problem. I don't want to become the scape goat for every problem in the neighborhood but I have always stated I would actually assist the people to either attach a filter to the source ' of it or to remedy the situation. Even without the tower I have been on the air in different antenna's which are less efficient which do cause more problems with ' interference and I have been on the air since the first part of June and I have had no complaints in that area. When you- look at amateur radio or any type of transmitting the higher the antenna the less problem you are going to have. You do have a limitation on how high you can go and that type of thing but what I do have is at a reasonable height so that I don't have that problem as much as I would if I had to go down to a real small antenna which is almost on the ground or a wire antenna along the house which would be a greater risk for the neighborhood. Walter Thompson moved to recommend the Council grant a conditional use permit for the erection of an amateur radio transmission antenna ' at 6901 Shawnee Drive and that the setback will be such as the height of the tower and antenna will not fall outside the lotline. The permit will be subject to review upon complaints by neighbors. Motion seconded by Tim Stone and unanimously approved. ' PUBLIC HEARING SUBDIVISION AND REZONING - RICHARD ERSBO ' Roman Roos called the hearing to order at 8:10 g p.m, with the following interested persons present: Richard Ersbo Bob Petersen Wendell Gravelun The Assistant City Planner read the official notice as published in the Carver County Herald. Mr. Ersbo submitted a revised plan showing recommended changes to the ' City Engineer. The Assistant City Planner.did not receive a copy. Dick Matthews moved to close the public hearing. Motion seconded by "Walter Thompson and unanimously approved. Hearing closed at 8 :15 p.m. SUBDIVISION AND REZONING - RICHARD ERSBO: -Dick Matthews moved to ' table action until November 9, 1978, to give staff time to review the revised plan. Motion seconded by Pat Swenson and unanimously approved. RILEY/PURGATORY CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT: The watershed district has requested all proposals of one acre of larger be sent to them for review and comment. - '- Council Meeting Jry 22, 1979 : -3_ Councilman Matthews moved to endorse Gayle Kincannon as Metropolitan • il-1. Transit Commission representative from Precinct H. Motion seconded II by Councilman Pearson. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hobbs, Councilmen Pearson and Matthews. Councilmen Neveaux and Geving voted' no. Motion carried. I 7k9- SUBDIVISION REQUEST - RICHARD ERSBO: Mr. Ersbo was present seeking approval to subdivide his property at 1275 Lake Lucy Road into four residential lots. Sanitary sewer is extended to the northeastern cornet of the property. The nearest water service is approximately 400 feet east. The Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the subdivision and rezoning to R-l. The Assistant City I Manager/Planner recommended approval conditioned that the applicant make -all public improvements including a looped water system, and also petition for extension of municipal water to serve the property. II Councilman Matthews moved to accept the Assistant City Manager/Planner's recommendation, reference Planning Case P-584. Motion seconded by Councilman Pearson.. - The following voted in favor: Mayor Hobbs, I Councilmen Pearson, Matthews, Neveaux, and Geving. No negative votes. Motion carried. - NATURAL GREEN, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: David Luce was present seeking 1 approval of a conditional use permit for his business at 1660 Arboretum Blvd. The Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended I approval of the conditional use permit. ID Councilman Pearson moved to table action and direct the City.Manager, along with-Bruce Pankonin, Jerry Schlenk, and Bob Waibel, prepare a narrative on the past history of this proposal. Motion seconded by Councilman Geving. .The following voted in favor: Mayor Hobbs; _ Councilmen Pearson; Matthews, Neveaux, and Geving. No negative votes. -Motion carried. SIDE YARD VARIANCE - GREGORY HOOPS: Mr. Hoops is requesting a 7' 10" I side yard variance to construct an attached garage to his home at 7604 Great Plains Blvd. The Board of Adjustments and Appeals met and recommended denial • of the request. . Councilman Neveaux moved to deny the request based upon the planning I report and the minutes of the Board of Adjustments and Appeals, Case P-608. Motion seconded by Councilman Matthews. The following voted in" favor: Mayor Hobbs, Councilmen Pearson, Matthews, Neveaux, and Geving. No negative votes. Motion carried. FILL PERMIT APPLICATION, JEAN LOVETANG: Ms._ Lovetang is requesting • I a fill permit to install 250 cubic yards of dirt on her property at 6850 Chanhassen Road. A letter was received from the Riley Purgatory Creek Watershed District stating this project does not meet their requirements therefore a grading and. land alteration permit will not . be required. - Councilman Neveaux moved to accept the Building Inspector's report of January 11, 1979, and allow the fill permit. Motion seconded by Councilme fi Matthews. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hobbs, Councilmen Pears , Neveaux, Matthews, and Geving. No -negative votes. Motion carried. CONSENT AGENDA: Mayor Hobbs asked if any council member wished to discuss any items on the consent .agenda. Mayor Hobbs asked that item a. II r .-e - it : . ' Council Meeting Jry 22, 1979 -3- Councilman Matthews moved to endorse Gayle Kincannon as Metropolitan Transit Commission representative from Precinct H. Motion seconded IT by Councilman Pearson. The following voted in favor : Mayor Hobbs, Councilmen Pearson and Matthews. Councilmen Neveaux and Geving voted no. Motion carried. II 7k9- SUBDIVISION REQUEST - RICHARD ERSBO: Mr. Ersbo was present seeking approval to subdivide his property at 1275 Lake Lucy Road into four II residential lots. Sanitary sewer is extended to the northeastern corner of the property. The nearest water service is approximately 400 feet east. The Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended II approval of the subdivision ,and rezoning to R-1. The Assistant City Manager/Planner recommended approval conditioned that the applicant make -all public improvements including a looped water system, and also petition for extension of municipal water to serve the property. - ' Councilman Matthews moved to accept the Assistant City Manager/Planner's recommendation, reference Planning Case P-584. Motion seconded by I Councilman Pearson.. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hobbs, Councilmen Pearson, Matthews, Neveaux, and Geving. No negative votes. Motion carried. _ 1 NATURAL GREEN, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: David Luce was present seeking approval of a conditional use permit for his business at 1660 Arboretum Blvd. The Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended IIapproval of the conditional use permit. I Councilman Pearson moved to table action and direct the City.Manager, along with•Bruce Pankonin, Jerry Schlenk, and Bob Waibel, prepare a narrative on the past history of this proposal. Motion seconded by Councilman Geving. _The following voted in favor: Mayor Hobbs, II Councilmen Pearson; Matthews, Neveaux, and Geving. No negative votes. . Motion carried. SIDE YARD VARIANCE - GREGORY HOOPS: Mr. Hoops is requesting a 7' 10" I side yard variance to construct an attached garage to his home at 7604 Great Plains Blvd. The Board of Adjustments and Appeals met and recommended de.nial • of the request. . ICouncilman Neveaux moved to deny the request based upon the planning report and the minutes of the Board of Adjustments and Appeals, Case P-608. Motion seconded by Councilman Matthews. The following voted in I favor: Mayor Hobbs, Councilmen Pearson, Matthews, Neveaux, and Geving. No negative votes. Motion carried. PILL PERMIT APPLICATION, JEAN LOVETANG: Ms. Lovetang is requesting a fill permit to install 250 cubic yards of dirt on her property at 6850 Chanhassen Road. A letter was received from the Riley Purgatory I Creek Watershed District stating this project does not meet their requirements therefore a grading and . land alteration permit will not be required. • • Councilman Neveaux moved to accept the Building Inspector's report of iii i January 11, 1979, and allow the fill permit. Motion seconded by Councilm Matthews. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hobbs, Councilmen Pearson INeveaux, Matthews, and Geving. No •negative votes. Motion carried. CONSENT AGENDA: Mayor Hobbs asked if any council _member wished to IIdiscuss any items on the consent .agenda. Mayor Hobbs asked that item a. CITY O F I to, _ 1 , , 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147• CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 II (612) 937-1900 * FAX (612)937-5739 II MEMORANDUM TO: Paul Krauss, Planning Director I FROM: Dave Hempel, Sr. Engineering Technician d0 DATE: March 20, 1990 II SUBJ: Revised Final Plat Review for Ersbo 2nd Addition II File No. 89-17 Land Use Review In review of the revised plat (Ersbo 2nd Addition) versus the plat of Ersbo Addition approved by City Council on December 18, II 1989, I offer the following comments and recommendations: 1. The construction plans for street, utility and drainage II improvements shall be amended'to coincide with the revised plat. The amended plans should be submitted to the City Engineer for approval. II 2. Now that the flag lot has been eliminated, a private driveway easement will be required over the westerly 20 feet of Lots 5 and 6, Block 1 for access to Lot 7. I e 3. The plat should dedicate a 20-foot wide drainage and utility easement as shown on the attached map across Lots 3 and 7, II Block 1 for the extension of watermain to the southeast corner of Lot 3.`" II4. On Lot 6 where a retention pond is proposed, the drainage and utility easement shall be enlarged to overlap the proposed pond by at least 10 :feet on all sides to reserve enough room for maintenance purposes (see attached) .- ;a II 5. The previously adopted conditions as set forth by the City Council on December 18, 1989 should also remain in effect as II conditions of approval. 6. Lot 1 and Lot 6 shall not be permitted direct driveway access onto Lake Lucy Road. I ktm Attachments: 1. Proposed drainage and utility easement (Lot 6, 1 Block 1 and Lot 3, Block 1. c: Gary Warren, City Engineer I II in t \9: I , 6 ?u , !/."7f' C f z:,-1/ - Z%/C/ _ - 335 47 Eo57 - - - - - t l OY 1 ; - popb$"O z �, ' N 1 N i 2"'i0� �j I I � .r.\� o � � o I I \ \s, 4.D I _ - zo i ..— fi a 1,.; , , 6 ono 1 ./: T , ) . N1 _ 1 `'' `1 ` 1 _ - 2 � I s. Li i `Q � ! - - 5 t" - n��^¢'ATE �o f —T= O i \\:), t0 u. I ��oy �S6` .tip° / �f� ark 1 y c\a o -7 _ 1 co /1 Q_ \o 3 c� 1 c ' ' - J \t` / /, N A`� a• \ __I` c.`I N - {\ Ok ! iL L�� t '\ -• i �` �1 '/\ I 1. � ,; \. (ti; -S` _ if J ` 30 I 1 / / / - - - - — - - - - \ \ — — — — — —t- t) NS t-- - --/ %- - - - - - -- — — — -- — \ — ■ -- -< , �1 ' • v-...... T ....... _ •IIMMEMI■Mirl Mr 4'540 Z 0 Pr. besi.44.re, "---- N 1 I 1 tor- 7 ' - r 1 I It fir _ �— _ _ - �f `�; ATTACHMENT NO. 1 • I Y ' :)-_ EASEMENT MAP Nöi WILLIAM R. ENGELHARDT ASSOCIATES, INC. I `Pano.d&n9 c nsinee1 1107 HAZELTINE BOULEVARD CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 =+'s:v (6121 448-8838 W L R 0 5 19 1j4 bt t , tot (,tiANHASSEN March 2, 1990 1 City of Chanhassen c/o Mr . Paul Krauss , City Planner 690 Coulter Drive Chanhassen, MN. 55317 RE: Subdivision of Ersbo 2nd Addition Plat for Approval Chanhassen, Minnesota Dear W . Krauss : Due to a discovery in the field staking of the Ersbo residential i subdivision, we have revised the plat and submit it for approval . The revised plat layout offers several advantages to the City of Chanhassen and the future owners of the lots. Advantages are listed as follows : I . The new plat has no flag lots. A flag lot would not meet the current ordinance and requires a variance. 2. The centerline for both cul-de-sacs are aligned. 3. The western boundary will serve two ( 2) lots instead of three (3) , thus reducing the impact to the nearby wetland. 4. The layout for the lots are more uniform. , 5. All lots meet the compliance table of the single family residential district ordinance. Please review and comment on the revised lot plan. If you have any questions please contact me at your convenience. ' Sincerely, WILLIAM R. ENGELHARDT ASSOCIATES, INC. a/1.i._ William M. Rudnicki V R/Ias cc: Richard Ersbo Roman Roos 1