B. Public Safety Status&OutlookCITYOF
CHANHASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard
PO Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
Administration
Phone: 9522271100
Fax: 9522271110
Building Inspections
Phone: 9522271180
Fax: 952 2271190
Engineering
Fax: 952 2271170
Finance
Ph(~ne: 952227 1140
Fax~ 952227 1110
Park & Recreation
Pilone 9522271120
Fax: 952.2271110
Recreatior/Ceo~er
2310 Coulter BouleYard
Phone: 952227 1400
Fax: 9522271404
Planning &
Natural Resources
Phome 9522271130
Fax 9522271110
Public Works
1591 Par~< Road
Phone~ 9522271300
Fax: 9522271310
Senior Center
Phone: 952 2271125
Fax: 952227 1110
Web Site
www c~ c~]an']asserLmr] us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor & City Council
FROM:
DATE:
Todd Gerhardt, City Manager ~ -
,,,,..,/, --.-
March 1, 2004
SUB J:
Public Safety Status & Outlook Update
The purpose of this meeting is to discuss the status of our current public safety
operation and determine what "next steps" the City Council would like to review.
To assist in this process, I have attached a Charge Statement to define the desired
results. I have questions regarding operational levels. Specifically:
Operational Levels
1. How will we handle a $5.00 per hour rate increase? (See Appendix J)
2. Do we need a lieutenant to supervise deputies vs. a sergeant?
3. Do we need an investigator?
I have also attached some demographic trends, statistics, and performance
indicators. It is important to understand the make-up of the City of Chanhassen and
the link between the Carver County Sheriff's Contract and our community.
Listed below are several relevant "data points" that provide profile descriptions of
the City of Chanhassen's, as well as call for services data which describes the
services received from the Carver County Sheriff's Contract.
Community Demographic Trends and Statistics
· 2003 Net Tax Capacity Rates
· Population Growth Actual/Projects
· Property Value Distribution
· Housing Comparison
· Land Use Comparison
· Metropolitan Council Community
Housing Profiles of Chanhassen
· City's 2004 Budget Review
· Carver County Population, Age, & Household Trends
· Chaska 2004 Police Budget/2000-2002 Crime Stats
· Maximus Study- Hourly Rate Suggestion
· Carver County Police Contract
· Chanhassen Calls for Service 2000-2003
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D
Appendix E
Appendix F
Appendix G
Appendix H
Appendix I
Appendix J
Appendix K
Appendix L
G:\ADMIN\TG"d:'UBLIC SAFETY STATUS.DOC
The Cil¥ of Chanhassen · A gro~,,'lng ,sc, r'qr,~unity with clean lakes quality schools a charming dowoto~%,m thrivir~g bL~sinesse,s windir (! trails anti beautif~d parks A
APPENDIX
A
2003 TAX
CAPACITY
RATES
APPENDIX
B
POPUL kTION
GROWTH
ACTUAL/PROJECTS
0000000000~
0000000000~
z
<000 20 ~
APPENDIX
C
PROPERTY VALU
DISTRIBUTION
City of Chanhassen - Key Financial Strategies
PROPERTY VALUE DISTRIBUTION FOR SELECTED CITIES
City
Total % %
AMV Commercial Residential
%
Other
AMV per
capita
Andover
Champlin
Chanhassen
Chaska
Farmington
Inver Grove Heights
Lino Lakes
Oakdale
Prior Lake
Savage
Shoreview
AVERAGE
1,165,008,200 2.80% 94.08% 3.13%
907,000,000 5.40% 79.04% 3.96%
1,583,486,000 6.89% 42.30% 50.80%
597,900,700 25.05% 66.93% 8.02%
388,537,500 7.06% 85.53% 7.41%
1,780,446,800 8.67% 78.48% 12.84%
872,369,300 6.85% 89.33% 3.82%
1,045,112,300 n/a n/a n/a
543,216,800 4.28% 92.75% 2.97%
608,564,500 9.96% 83.34% 6.65%
1,276,968,650 n/a n/a n/a
978,964,614 8.55% 79.09% 11.07%
43,817.07
40,868.74
77,923.63
34,265.61
31,422.36
59,844.94
51,954.58
39,211.81
34,128.O9
28,821.43
49,258.16
44,683.31
n/a - information not available
EHLERS
& ASSOCIATES IN C
7/19/2002
Page 3 of 5
APPENDIX
D
HOUSING
COMPARISON
0 0
APPENDIX
LAND USE
COMPARISON
Land Uses for Comparable Cities - 2002 Data
Land Use
Single Family
Multi-Family
Commercial
Office
Industrial
Institutional
Parks and Open Space
Agricultural
Undevetopable
Total
Chanhassen 2020
Acres Percent
7,718 52.3%
1,027 7.0%
348 2.4%
117 0.8%
1,269 8.6%
1,242 8.4%
1,466 9.9%
0.O%
10.7%
1,573
14,760
Land Use Savage
Andover
Acres Percent
6,369 28.6%
49 0.2%
81 0.4%
9 0.0%
124 0.6%
230 1.0%
1,156 5.2%
2,669 12.0%
22,300
Chaska
Acres Percent
1,969 21.3%
220 2.4%
164 1.8%
18 0.2%
510 5.5%
328 3.6%
1,702 18.5%
1,413 15.3%
2,900 31.4%
9,224
Farmington
Acres Percent
1,542 19.5%
59 0.7%
104 1.3%
0.0%
184 2.3%
292 3.7%
369 4.7%
3,930 49.8%
1,411 17.9%
7,891
Lino Lakes
Acres Percent
3,800 17.9%
67 0.3%
90 0.4%
- 0.0%
252 1.2%
339 1.6%
3,487 16.4%
3,153 31.4%
10,033 47.3%
21,221
Oakdale
Acres Percent
2756 38.1%
552 7.6%
313 4.3%
66 0.9%
212 2.9%
303 4.2%
676 9.4%
221 3.1%
2,128 29.4%
7,227
Single Family
Multi-Family
Commercial
Office
Industrial
Institutional
Parks and Open Space
Agricultural
Undevelopable
Total
Acres Percent
2,770 26.4%
178 1.7%
13O 1.2%
0.0%
762 7.3%
160 1.5%
1,55O 14.8%
503 4.8%
4,439 42.3%
10,492
Shoreview
Acres Percent
3,124 38.6%
566 7.0%
133 1.6%
7O 0.9%
228 2.8%
188 2.3%
1,544 19.1%
5 0.1%
2,242 27.7%
8,100
Plymouth
Acres Percent
8,389 37.2%
1,4O9 6.3%
6O8 2.7%
251 1.1%
1,637 7.3%
813 3.6%
2,109 9.4%
965 4.3%
6,360 28.2%
22,541
Woodbury
Acres Percent
5,474 23.9%
1 ,O9O 4.8%
572 2.5%
104 0.5%
229 1.0%
531 2.3%
1,917 8.4%
7,124 31.1%
5,852 25.6%
22,893
Edina
Acres Percent
5,453 53.3%
652 6.4%
401 3.9%
352 3.4%
396 3.9%
478 4.7%
1,518 14.8%
0.0%
975 9.5%
10,225
Minnetonka
Acres Percent
8956 50.0%
911 5.1%
735 4.1%
176 1.0%
697 3.9%
536 3.0%
1,459 8.2%
0.0%
4,430 24.7%
17,900
APPENDIX
F
M I <OPOLITAN
COUNCIL
COMMUNITY
HOUSING
PROFILES OF
CHANHASSEN
Community Housing Profiles for Chanhassen
Data from 1990 and 2000 U.S. Census except as noted.
Table 1: Demographics
Demographic information 1990 2000 Change % change
Total population " 11,732 20,321 8,589 73.2%
Number of households 4,016 6,914 2,898 72.2%
Persons per household 2.92 2.94 0.02 0.7%
Number of families 3,273 5,524 2,251 68.8%
Persons per family 3.24 3.33 0.09 2.8%
Table 2: Population by age
1990 2000 change
Age
Number % of total Number % of total Number Percent
Under 5 years 1,343 ' ' il.4% 2,020 " 9.~'~o 677 50.4%
5 to 9 1,083 t 9.2% 2,227 11.0% 1,144 105.6%
10 to 14 811 6.9% 1,889 9.3% 1,078 132.9%
15 to 17 431 J 3.7% 890 4.4% 459 106.5%
18 to 21 421 3.6% 540 2.7% 119 28.3%
22 to 24 346 / 2.9% 357 1.8% 11 3.2%
25 to 34 -- 2,83--~-~- 24.1% 2,608 12.8% -224 -7.9%
35 to 44 2'229 i 19.0% 4,903 24.1% 2,674 120.0%
45 to 54 1,157~ 9.9% 2,816 13.9% 1,659 143.4%
55 to 64 627~,__ 5.3% 1,151 5.7% 524 83.6%
65 to 74 _3071 2.6% 591 2.9% 284 92.5%
75 to 84 110~ 0.9% 270 1.3% 160 145.5%
85 and older 35 I 0.3% 59 0.3% 24 68.6%
Total population 11,7321 100.0% 20,321 100.0% 8,589 73.2%
Table 3: Race/ethnicity by age, 2000
Black or Asian or Two or
Age African American Pacific Other more Hispanic
White American Indian Islander race races or Latino
Under 5 years J ,891 18 2 53 6 50 57
5 to 17 4,702 38 4 160 38 64 111
18 to 24 812 12 8 48 4 13 41
25 to 44 7,147 63 8 223 28 42 156
45 to 54 2,724 15 3 50 7 17 31
55 to 64 1,109 5 5 27 1 4 3
65 to 74 572 0 I 15 0 3 3
75 and older 327 I 0 I 0 0 0'
Total population 19,284 152 31 577, * ~ 84 193 402
MetropoUto~_ Council
Meats Park Centre - 230 East Fifth Street - St. Paul, Minnesota 551014626 ' (65 I) 602-1000 - Fax 602-1550 · 'ITY 2914)904
Metro Info Li~e 602-1888 - data. center~netc, state, mn. us , www. metroc o uncil, org
Community Housing Profiles for Chanhassen
Page 2 of 8
Table 4: Households by type
Household type 1990 2000 Change % Change
Family households 3,273 _ 5,524 2,251 68,8%
Married couples 2,982 4,925 1,943 65.2%
- With related children under age 18 1,767 3,143 1,376 77.9%
- No related Children under age 18 1,215 1,782 567 46.7%
Other families 291 599 308 105.8%
Male householder, no wife present 88 168 80_ 90.9%
~ With related children under age 18 47 ___112 65 138.3%
- No related children under age 18 · 41 56 15 36,6%
Female householder, no husband present 203 431 228 112.3%
- With related children under age 18 137 _~316 179 130.7%
- No related children under age 18 66 115. 49 74.2%
Non-family households 743 -~,390 -- 647 87.1%
1-person 527 1,086 559 106.1%
2 or more persons ' 216 304 88 40.7%
Total 4,016 6,914 2,898 72.2%
Table 5: Household type by age of householder, 2000
Other non-family
Age of owner householder Family household 1-person household household
Young adults (15-24 years) 19 7 12
Working-age population (25-64) 4,909 588 177
Elderly (65 and older) 325 150 12
Other non-family
~ge of renter householder Family household 1-person household household
Young adults (15-24 years) 39 33 58
Working-age population (25-64) 202 215 27
Elderly (65 and older) 56 89 0
Table 6: Tenure by age of householder
1990 2000 Change
Age of householder
Owners Renters Owners Renters Owners Renters
15-24 years 34 92 42 112 8 20
25-34 1,086 288 1,029 203 -57 -85
35-44 1,111 107 2,473 147 1,362 40
45-54 609 37 1,549 88 940 51
55-64 340 25 622 58 282 33
65-74 177 16 311 44 134 28
75 and over 71 23 169 .67 98 44
Total households 3,428 588 --6,195 ..... 7~9' 2;767 - 131
Community Housing Profiles for Chanhassen
Page 3 of 8
Table 7: Race/ethnicity by tenure and age of householder, 2000
Owner-occupied units Renter-occupied units
Age of householder Hispani(~-- Hispanic
White Non-white or Lafino White Non-white or Latino
15-24 years 39 3 0 104 8 7
25-34 985 44 7 175 28 25
35~44 2,391 82 19 130 17 11
45-54 1,511 38 8 79 9 5
55-64 609 13 0 51 7 0
65-74 306 5 I 43 I 0
75 and over 168 I 0 67 0 0
Total households 6,009 186 35 649 70 48
Table 8: Occupied housing units by type and tenure
Type of housing and 1990 20(~)0
units in structure Owners Renters Owners Renters
Single family, detached 3,102 10~ 5,212 88
Single family, attached 292 31 920 37
Duplexes 8 21 10 23
Buildings with 3 or 4 units 15 30 24 35
Buildings with 5 to 19 units 1 197 33 208
Buildings with 20 or more units 0 193 0 328
Mobile homes 2 0 0 0
Other units 8 11 0 0
Total occupied housing units 3,428 588 6,199 719
Table 9: Measures of crowding by tenure, 2000
Measures of crowding Owner households Renter households
1.0 person per room or fewer 6,1 '18 "628
More than 1.0 person per room 81 91
Table 10: Value of owner-occupied units, county assessors' data
Value: Number of Number of
units in 2000 units in 2002
under $50,000 6 2
$50,000-$74,999 29 9
$75,000-$99,999 209 16
$100,000-$124,999 875 345
$125,000-$149,999 925 687
$150,000-$174,999 1,038 688
$175,000-$199,999 738 977
$200,000-$249,999 975 1,266
$250,000-$299,999 598 792
$300,000-$399,999 662 1,025
$400,000-$499,999 187 473
$500,000 or more 110 324
Total owner units: 6~352 6~604
Source: County Assessors' database.
Community Housing Profiles for Chanhassen
Page 4 of 8
Table 11: Value of owner-occupied units, 2000
Value of owner-occupied units: ; Number of units.
Under $100,000 162
$100,000-$149,999 1,180
$150,000-$174,999 797
$175,000-$199,999 784
$200,000-$299,999 1,727
$300,000-$399,999 847
$400,000-$499,999 391
$500,000 or higher 311
Total owner units: 6,199
Table 12: Median value of oWner-occupied units
1990 value $123,400
1990 value in 2000 $'s $157,660
2000 value --- $210,700
Table 13: Monthly housing costs by mortgage status, 2000
Owner-occupied units with a mortgage
Monthly housing costs Owner units
Less than $300 0
$300-$399 20
$400-$499 19
$5OO-$599 36
$600-$699 51
$700-$799 176
$800-$899 127
$900-$999 202
$1,000-$1,249 762
$1,250-$1,499 896
$1,500 or more 2,926
Total 5,215
Owner-occupied units with no mortgage
~1onthly housing costs Owner units
Less than $200 17
$200-$299 83
$300-$499 274
$500-$799 111
~;800 or more ..... 93
Total 578
Table 14: Median housing costs for owner-occupied units
Median monthly housing costs
1990 1990 cost in 2000 $'s 2000
by mortgage status
With a mortgage $1,088 $1,390 $1,616
Without a mortgage - $282 $360 $429
Table 15: Gross monthly rent paid, 2000
Gross rent Number of units
Less than $200 14
$2oo-$299 o
$300-$399 0
$400-$499 41
$500-$599 164
$600-$699 157
$700-$799 27
:$800-$899 103
;900-$999 83
$1,000-$1,249 63
$1,250 or more 16
Table 16: Median gross rent
1990 $508
1990 in 2000 $'s $649
20OO $657
Community Housing Profiles for Chanhassen
Page 5 of 8
Table 17: Gross rents paid by number of bedrooms, 2000
Rent categories Number of bedrooms
None One Two Three or more
With cash rent 50 372 161 85
Less than $200 0 0 14 0
$200-$299 0 0 0 0
$300-$499 8 24 0 9
$500-$749 42 255 41 0
$750-$999 0 93 81 22
$1,000 or more 0 0 25 54
No cash rent 0 10 24 17
Total 50 382 185 102
Table 18: Household income by age of householder, 1999
Income Age of householder
Under 25 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 175 and over
Less than $10,000 8 13 0 32 8 13 7
~10,000-$14,999 0 0 59 0 18 30 14
~;15,000-$19,999 10 14 30 16 14 20 18
t;20,000-$24,999 0 36 32 49 5 26 34
!$25,0~0~-$~,999 32 25 43 66 12 11 34
!$30,~-~4,999 0 51 38 30 36 33 8
!$35,000-$39,999 20 38 46 53 33 27 15
!$40,000-$44,999 20 83 58 6 26 24: 24
~$45,000-$49,999 0 63 45 39 9 31 17
$50,000-$59,999 22 158 168 139 77 17 30
$60,000-$74,999 17 157 273 138 99 21 0
$75,000-$99,999 9 268 527 341 142 43 5
$100,000-$124,999 0 123 393 229 108 19 0
!$125,000-$149,999 0 73 282 183 53 8 0
$150,000-$199,999 0 61 300 152 48 15 7
$2b0,000 or mere 3 97 255 168 69 11 0
Total household s 141 1,260 2,549 1,541 757 349 213
Table 19: Median household income by age, 1999
Age of householder Median
household income
Under 25 years $40,089
25-34 $73,462
35-44 $97,741
45-54 $89,498
55-64 $79,171
65-74 $41,510
75 and older $29,943
All households $84,215
Community Housing Profiles for Chanhassen
Page 6 of 8
Table 20: Housing costs as a percent of household income 2000
Households paying less than 30% Households paying 30% or more
! 999 income of income for housing of income for housing
Owners Renters Owners Renters
Less than $10,000 0 0 63 10
$10,000-$19,999 26 14 113 55
$20,000-$34,999 85 120 274 139
$35,000-$49,999 290 131 201 16
$50,000-$74,999 739 141 324 0
$75,000-$99,999 1,057 18 153 0
$100,000 or more 2,385 24 75 0
Table 21: Households paying 35% or more of income for housing costs, 2000
Households paying % of household income
Tenure for housing
35% - 39.9% 40% - 49.9% 50% or more
Owners 232 196 405
Renters 45 57 50
Table 22: Households paying 30% or more of income for housing
by age of householder 2000
Age of householder Owner Renter
Under 25 years 15 54
25-34 240 51
35-44 447 15
45-54 241 19
55-64 150 24
65-74 62 33
75 and older 48 24
Table 23: Poverty rates
Poverty rates Below poverty level in 1989 Below poverty level in 1999
Number Percent Number Percent
Individuals 233' 2.0% 386 1.9%
Families 38 . 1.1% 79 1.4%
Households 78 1.9% 124 1.8%
Table 24: Poverty status by age
Persons below poverty level in 1989 Persons below poverty level in 1999
Age group
Number Percent Numbe~ :. Percent
Under 5 17 1.3% 58 2;9%
5 7 3.6% 16 3.6%
6-11 13 1.0% 66 2,6%
12-17 15 1.8% 36 1.8%
18-64 169 2.2% 190 1.5%
65-74 12 4.2% 13 2.3%
75 and over 0 0.0% 7 2.2%
Community Housing Profiles for Chanhassen
Page 7 of 8
Table 25: Poverty status by family type, 1999
Number below Percent below
Family type poverty level poverty level
Married-couple family 49 1.0%
- With related children under age 18 43 1.4%
- No related children under age 18 6 0.3%
Male householder, no wife present 0 0.0%
- With related children under age 18 0 0.0%
- No related children under age 18 0 0°0%
Female householder, no husband present 30 7.2%
~; With related children under age 18 30 10~-~
- No related children under age 18 0 0.0%
Table 26: Homeless population by county
Sco~ and
!Year Anoka Dakota Hennepin Ramsey Carver Washington Total
2000 259 175 3,59__ . 2_ _ 981 100__176 5,383
2002 289 238 3,659 1,429 53 103 5,824
Source: MN Dept. of Children, Families and Learning Quarterly Shelter Survey.
Table 27: Year structure was built
1999-
Year structure 1939 or 1940- 1950- 1960- 1970- 1980- 1990- 1995- March
was built earlier 1949 1959 1969 ! 1979 1989 1994 1998 2000 Totals
Owner-occupied 155 i 82 356 390 563 1,725 1,246 1,174 508 6,199
Renter-occupied 58 i 9 47 105 -~ -'--- 8~ 83 78 0 719
Table 28: Residential permits issued, 1970 through 2001
Number of units 'Permitted in:
Type of residential permits issued 1970-197-9 1980-198---9 1990-1994 1995-1999 2000 2001
Single family, detached 616 1,634 1,133 1,019 _ 119 __ 9~
Townhouse - 52 192 114 339 30 28
Duplex ~--- 26 128 0 0 0 0
Mulfifamily 173 88 14 305 162 114
Total permits -- 867 -- 2,0----4~ -- 1,261 1,663 311 234
Source: Metropolitan Council Annual Building Permit Survey.
Table 29: Residential demolitions, 1990 through 2001
Type of unit demolished Number of demolitions'
Single-family, detached 44
Other residential 0
Total 44
Source: Metropolitan Council Annual Building Permit Survey.
Community Housing Profiles for Chanhassen
Page 8 of 8
Table 30: Job growth
Employment 6,105 8,501 . 2,396 1 39.2% I
Source: Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development
(formerly Minnesota Department of Economic Security) and Metropolitan Council.
Table 31: Wage information, 2002
Wage group Jobs*
Jobs paying $5.15 or less/hr 167
Paying $5.16 to $11.04/hr 2,630
Paying $11.05 to $18.44/hr 3,370
Paying $18.45 to $29.49/hr 2,298
Paying $29.50 to $36.87/hr 584
Paying over $36.87/hr 1,231
Total jobs in community 10,279
*Numbers may not add to total due to rounding.
Source: Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development
(formerly Minnesota Department of Economic Security) and Metropolitan Council.
APPENDIX
G
CITY'S 2004
BUDGET REVIEW
The City ol Chanhassen laces several
budget challenges for 2004. The state's
budget problems have been resolved, in
part, by cutting aids to cities. Strict levy
limits were also imposed to make sure that
cities didn't raise property taxes
excessively. This means Chanhassen's
revenues will be lower in 2004 than they
were in 2003. Combined with service
needs which increase with our rising
population, this causes a challenge while
preparing the budget.
~l~-.'.m ~ ~ The city is losing $298,734 in
Market Value Homestead Credit and
$20,475 in Local Government Aid. The city
is allowed to levy back 60% ol this aid loss,
so revenues will be reduced by approximately
$127,684 due to state aid cuts.
Another revenue change is lor interest
earnings. The city made 3% on investments
last year, but the interest rate decline that
occurred this year will reduce our earnings.
Revenue estimates have been decreased by
$40,000 in this account to reflect this change.
The general fund expendi-
ture budget is up less than 1% over 2003.
This includes personal service increases of
2.2% Ior salaries and 15% lor health
insurance. City staff is investigating options
to reduce health care costs including plan
design changes and increased co-payments.
The general government portion of the
budget covers the City Council, Administra-
tion, Finance, Legal, Assessing, MIS, City
Hall Maintenance, Library Maintenance,
and Elections. This area has increased
nearly 7%, due mainly to providing utilities
and cleaning service to the new library for a
The Chanhassen Conncel, ion
2004 Budget Revenue
Charges forOther
Inter- Services Revenues
government 7% 2%
Charges ,.
Permits
14%
Licenses
1%
Iull year of operation, paying Ior an election
that we hold every other year, and increased
liability insurance costs.
Public salety, which encompasses Crime
Prevention, Fire, Permits & Inspections,
and Community Service, was essentially
fiat in budget requests.
Public works shows a large decrease from
the previous year due to changes in how the
city intends to fund local street maintenance.
Where we previously did sealcoating-type
projects, we will now pedorm more
thorough maintenance procedures which
will be funded from special assessments
and debt rather than general fund monies.
This Irees up funds to be transferred toward
our debt service costs, which will reduce
the overall debt service tax levy.
The debt service
levies were adjusted quite a while back in
an attempt to work out of our tax increment
(TIF) deficit situation. The debt schedule
included a large jump in 2004 because we
believed the Downtown TIF district would
be back on the general tax rolls at that time.
However, we are now intending to extend
the life ol that district at least one year in
accordance with new legislation regarding
TIF deficits. In order to offset this debt
service need, staff has proposed transfer-
ring nearly $1.5 million Irom other funds to
resolve this short-term imbalance. This
brings the amount that is necessary for
debt service down to a manageable
$48,000 increase.
2004 Budget Expenditures
Park &
Recreation
18%
Translers General
6% Government
21%
Community
Development
12%
Public Works
23%
Public
Salety
2O%
, ~': ~:Citieshave
a long time frame for adopting a budget Ior
the following year. Each year, the City
Manager directs the department heads to
prepare a preliminary budget request for
each of the divisions that they supervise.
Those budgets must be completed in July.
The City Manager and Finance Director
then review the preliminary expenditures,
compare them with the preliminary revenue
estimates, and recommend a tax levy
amount to the City Council. The Council
must set a not-to-exceed preliminary levy
by September 15 and send that information
to the County Auditor. The counties, school
districts, and other taxing iurisdictions also
adopt preliminary levies in September. All
of this information will be used to generate
a Truth in Taxation notice that will be mailed
to each property owner in November. The
notice will show the effect of these levy
decisions on individual properties. The
City Council will be reviewing individual
department budgets between now and
December. Councilors will then hold a
public hearing to accept citizen input
regarding the budget on December 1,
consider changes suggested, and adopt a
final budget and tax levy on December 8.
Final levies must be adopted within five
working days of December 20.
The preliminary budget is available in the
Finance Department. Call Bruce DeJong,
Finance Director at 952-227-1149 Ior
more inlormation.
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2004 BUDGET
Expenditures
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
1110 Legislative
1120 Administration
1130 Finance
1140 Legal
1150 Assessing
1160 MIS
1170 City Hall
1180 Elections
1190 Library Building
TOTAL
Personal Materials & Contractual Capital
Services Supplies Services Outlay
34,2OO
339,600
204,900
144,400
60,800
24,250
200 84,800
500 52,700
970 84,350
110,000
70,100
16,100 97,550
41,400 313,200
7,500
61,500
5OO
2,500
5O0
808,150 59,170 881,700 3,500
Total
119,200
393,300
292,720
110,000
70,100
258,050
415,900
31,750
61,500
1,752,520
2OO3
Total
136,370
380,000
281,650
110,000
70,100
257,36O
393,100
0
34,000
1,662,580
LAW ENFORCEMENT
Law Enforcement
1220 Fire
1250 Buildinglnspection
1260 CSO
TOTAL
PUBLIC WORKS
1310 Engineering
1320 Street Maintenance
1350 Street Lighting
1370 Vehicle Maintenance
TOTAL
66,800 1,015,000
475,300 43,700 96,350
669,700 6,200 24,500
42,850 4,550 11,050
1,254,650 54,450 1,146,900
1,081,800
615,350
700,400
58,450
2,456,O0O
434,600 800 19,010 250 454,660
543,000 133,150 33,270 1,250 710,670
1,500 231,800 233,300
234,200 78,200 40,300 6,000 358,700
1,211,800 213,650 324,380 7,500
1,757,330
1,077,800
616,800
737,400
60,700
2,492,7OO
460,310
707,97O
260,300
361,000
1,789,580
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
1410 Planning Commission
1420 Planning Administration
1430 Senior Commission
* TOTAL
PARKS & RECREATION
1510 Park &Rec. Commission
1520 Park Administration
1530 Recreation Center
1540 Lake Ann
1550 Park Maintenance
1560 Senior Center
1600 Recreation Programs
1700 Self-Suppoding Programs
3OO,650
17,350
150 2,950
700 14,125
220 1,050
318,000 1,070 18,125
125 1,100
97,400 1,000 6,100
183,100 12,350 34,800
10,975 9,340 42,825
576,800 83,300 104,850
30,650 3,500 9,775
147,800 13,400 70,200
29,400 8,650 77,300
3,000
3,100
315,475
18,620
337,195
1,225
104,500
230,250
63,140
767,950
43,925
231,400
115,350
3,700
306,975
18,450
329,125
1,225
107,300
236,650
63,140
781,400
43,025
230,905
123,155
TOTAL
Total Operational Expenditures
Transfer to Debt Service
** TOTAL GENERAL FUND
1,076,125 131,665 346,950 3,000
4,668,725 460,005 2,718,055 14,000
1,557,740
7,860,785
821,915
1,586,800
7,860,785
900,470
%
Change
-12.59%
3.50%
3.93%
0.00%
0.00%
0.27%
5.80%
8O.88%
5.41%
O.37%
-5.02%
-3.71%
-1.47'
-1.23%
0.38%
-10.37%
-0.64%
-1.80%
-16.22%
2.77%
0.92%
2.45%
0.00%
-2.61%
-2.70%
0.00%
-1.72%
2.09%
0.21%
-6.34%
-1.83%
0.00%
-8.72%
8,682,700 8,761,255 -0.90%
101
IACCOUNT
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2004 BUDGET
REVENUE
General Fund
DESCRIPTION
2002 2003 2004
ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET
GENERAL PROPERTY TAX
3010
3002
3011
3041
3090
3500
Current Properly Tax
Allowance for Delinquent Taxes
Delinquent Property Tax
Homestead & Ag Credit
Other Property Taxes
Local Government Aid
TOTAL GENERAL PROPERTY TAX
LICENSES
3203 Dog Kennel
3205 Dog or Cat
3213 Solicitor
3223 3.2 Off and On Sale
3226 Liquor On and Off Sale
3227 Club and Sunday
3230 Rental Housing Licenses
3284 Rubbish
* TOTAL LICENSES
PERMITS
3301 Building
3302 Plan Check
3305 Heating & A/C
3306 Plumbing
3307 Trenching
3308 Gun
3309 Sprinkler
3310 Gas Piping
3311 Sign
3316 Septic Tank
3320 Stable
3328 Wetland Alteration
3329 Demolition
3390 Misc. Permits
* TOTAL PERMITS
5,011,983
44,955
235,163
354,584
20,472
6,465,535 6,657,060
(284,050) (389,060)
50,000 50,000
5,667,157 6,231,485 6,318,000
463 600 450
2,061 2,300 2,000
745 550 550
868 800 850
50,161 55,000 81,000
7,762 1,700
40,000 20,000
1,090 500 500
63,150 101,450 105,350
665,766 616,000 616,000
355,104 365,000 365,000
110,255 110,000 110,000
95,010 88,000 88,000
18,197 10,000 10,000
960 1,000 1,000
4,348 16,000 5,000
30 30,000
3,615 3,000 3,000
400 2,000 2,000
260 300 300
1,100 600 600
100 100
965 1,500 1,500
1,256,010 1,243,500 1,202,500
FINES & PENALTIES
3401 Traffic & Ordinance Violation
3404 Dog/Cat Impound
* TOTAL FINES & PENALTIES
28,106 35,000 35,000
4,714 4,000 4,000
32,820 39,000 39,000
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2004 BUDGET
REVENUE
101 General Fund
ACCOUNT
DESCRIPTION
2002 2003 2004
ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
3502 M.S.A. Maint. & Constr.
3509 Other Shared Taxes
3510 Grants-State
* TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REV
33,555 33,600 33,600
115,580 108,000 108,000
40,100 40,000 40,000
189,235 181,600 181,600
CHARGES FOR CURRENT SERVICES
3601
3602
3603
3604
3605
3613
3614
3617
3619
3629
3631
3633
3634
3635
3636
3637
3638
3639
3649
Sale of Documents
Use & Variance Permits
Rezoning Fees
Assessment Searches
Plat Recording Fees
Misc.-General Government
Admin. Charge-2% Constr.
Engineering General
Investment Management Fee
Misc.-Public Safety
Recreation Center
Park Equipment Rental
Park Facility Usage Fee
Watercraft Rental
Self-Supporting Programs
Senior Programs
Food Concessions
Misc.-Park & Rec.
Misc.-Public Works
TOTAL CURRENT SERVICES
1,928 4,000 4,000
16,432 23,000 23,000
50 1,000 1,000
540 700 700
9,345 6,000 6,000
3,884 59,000 59,000
78,903 40,000 40,000
11,600 11,600
65,000 65,000 65,000
6,916 5,000 5,000
177,098 207,500 207,500
138 150 150
9,336 15,500 15,500
3,661 4,000 4,000
178,126 147,000 147,000
11,780 30,000 30,000
9,837 16,000 16,000
714 800 800
5,838 2,000 2,000
579,526 638,250 638,250
OTHER REVENUE
3801
3802
3803
3807
3808
3812
3816
3818
3820
3829
3903
Interest Earnings 130,893 170,000 130,000
Equipment Rental & Sale 71,591 30,000 30,000
Building Rental 16,108
Donations 35,710 15,000 15,000
Ins. Recoveries & Reimburse 2,314 5,000 5,000
Contractor Verification 2,500
SAC Retainer 5,280 5,000 5,000
Sur-Tax Retainer 838 1,500 1,500
Misc. Other Revenue 207 5,000 5,000
Interest/Penalties-Other 500 500
Refunds/Reimbursements 26,772 6,000 6,000
TOTAL OTHER REVENUE 289,713 240,500 198,000
** TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE 8,077,611 8,675,785 8,682,700
Transfers In
Total 8,077,611 8,675,785 8,682,700
07/23/2001 ~ON 09:54 FAX 612 920 1069 DECISION RESOURCES ~004/025
13. What actions would you recommend? [n=97]
NO ANSWER, 20%; MORE COPIMUNITY EVENTS, 38%;
NEIGHBORHOOD EVENTS, 7%; COMlqIJNITY CENTER, 21%;
IMPROVE COPIMUNICATIONS, 5%; SCATTERED, 10%.
On another topic .......
14.
How safe would you feel walking
alone in your neighborhood a~ter
dark -- very safe, reasonably
sa~e, somewhat safe, or very un-
safe?
VERY SAFE ............. 63%
REASONABLY SAFE ....... 29%
SOMEWHAT SAFE .......... 6%
VERY UNSAFE ............ 2%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ..... 0%
15.
Are there any areas in the City of Chanhassen where you
would be afraid to walk alone at night? (IF "YES," ASK:)
Where would they be?
NO ANSWER, 5%; NONE, 79%; EVERYWHERE, 2%;
PARKS - LAKES, 7%; UNLIT STREETS, 3%.
DOWNTOWN, 3%;
16.
During the past three months, were YES .................... 4%
you or anyone in your household NO .................... 96%
the victim of crime in Chanhassen? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ..... 0%
17.
Have you participated in a neigh-
borhood block party in the last
year?
YES ................... 37%
NO .................... 63%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ..... 0%
As you may know, property tax revenues are divided among the City
of Chanhassen, Carver County, and your local public school dis-
trict.
18.
For each dollar of the property
taxes you pay, about what per-
centage do you think goes to
city goverrnnent? (READ #1-~6)
TEN PERCENT OR LESS .... 9%
10.1 TO 19.9 PERCENT..28%
20 TO 29.9 PERCENT .... 22%
30 TO 39.9 PERCENT .... 10%
40 TO 49.9 PERCENT ..... 2%
50 PERCENT OR MORE .....
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED .... 26%
The actual percentage of your property taxes going to the City of
Chanhassen is about twenty percent.
I would like to read you a list of a £ew city services. For each
one, please tell me whether you would rate the quality of the
service as excellent, good, only fair, or poor?
EXCL GOOD FAIR POOR D.K.
19. Police protection? 25% 56% 9% 3% 7%
20. Fire protection? 35% 49% 0% 0% 16%
21. Emergency medical services? 27% 42% 4% 0% 26%
22. Sanitary sewer service? 19% 65% 5% 3% 9%
07/23/2001 MON 09:54 FAX 612 920 1069 DECISION RESOL~CES ~005/025
EXCL GOOD FAIR POOR
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
Accommodation and control of
storm water run-off? 14% 61% 8% 5% 12%
Animal control? 15% 62% 7% 5% 12%
Park maintenance? 32% 60% 2% 1% 5%
Condition of trails? 29% 58% 2% 2% 10%
Recreational programs? 21% 51% 5% 1% 23%
Street lighting? 9% 67% 15% 7% 2%
Issuance of building permits? 5% 41% 10% 8% 37%
Building inspection? 7% 44% 8% 7% 34%
Property maintenance enforce-
ment? 6% 52% 7% 2% 33%
IF "ONLY FAIR" OR "POOR" ON ANY OF ABOVE CITY SERVICES, ASK:
32. Why do you feel that way? [n=243]
POOR INSPECTION, 10%; MOKE STREET LIGHTS NEEDED, 20%;
FLOODING, 9%; LOOSE ANIMALS, 10%; POOR POLICE SERVICE,
14%; NO CODE ENFORCEMENT, 7%; DIRTY, 5%; TOO MUCH RED
TAPE, 13%; WATER TASTE, 3%; TOO MANY PERMITS ISSUED,
3%; SCATTERED, 6%.
Roadways in the City of Chanhassen consist of both city streets,
county roads, state highways, and one U.S. Highway. County roads
in the city include Lyman Boulevard, Galpin Boulevard, Powers
Boulevard, and Pioneer Trail. State Highways in Ehe city include
Highway 41, or ~azeltine Boulevard, Highway 101, or Great Plains
Boulevard, Highway 5, or Arboretum Boulevard, and Highway 7. The
U.S. Highway is Flying Cloud Drive or Highway 212. In the follow-
ing questions, please consider only city streets and none of
these county, state, or U.S. highways.
Again, please tell me whether you would rate the quality of the
following services as excellent, good, only fair, or poor?
EXCL GOOD FAIR POOR D.K.
33. Pavement repair and patching
on city streets? 11% 63% 18% 6% 2%
34. Snowplowing of city streets? 30% 54% 11% 3% 2%
Changing topics ....
35.
Would you favor or oppose an in- FAVOR ................. 42%
crease in YOUR city property tax OPPOSE ................ 51%
if it were needed to maintain city DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ..... 7%
services at their current level?
IF "OPPOSE," ASK:
APPENDIX
H
CARVER COUNTY
POPULATION,
AGE, &
HOUS[I fOLD
TRENDS
Regional Development Framework 2030 Forecasts Adopted January 2004
Households Population Employment
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 150 I 2010
City or Township 2030 I 1990
Benton Twp. 234! 2601 2761 3071 3201 330 340 947 i 9391 895 ~9~3~__~__940i 940 202i 227i 300 310: 3201 330
Camden Twp. 23~1 2~_ 3161_ 340! 37~ 400 895I ~8~8' ~-9~0, 955i 960. 9801 1,030 ~ ! 10, 12! 12i---- 30i 40! 50
Carver 182 218 262, 4581 1100' 1600 2,300 --~69 '---~--~4'~' 1,~! ~~,600 60~ 8~ 95~ 156~---350~ 550~ 600
Chanhassen(pt.) 1,343)~ 4,~;~- 6,9~4; 9,9ooi 13,000! 15,000 4,839 i ~~0321' 2~;~%~,000 900 11,8 ~,605i 7,571~ 11,3301 13,500] 13,900
~ ~7,449 23,800 24,200t 24,500 1,140 ~ 5,447 7,833:10,1~~13 9~' 15,100
Chaska 1 ~~6 104~ 9,000~ 9 50~10,000 4,352 ' ...... "-~ ........
ChaskaTwp. 29J 59, 60i 65' 1,000 3,000J 4,000 119---~ ~ n54 2,7001 7,800' 10,0~ 50-1 50 ~ _~ 66 '400~ ~ 1,500
Cologne 174! 20~ 216, ~-~;000~ 1,300 558~ ~; ~12~ 1,800~ ~ 70: 100' 212: ~ ~ 450
DaMgrenTwp. 265 331) ~ 479¢ 700_ 2,100 3,600 1,147; 1,225; 1 296 1 453 2000 5700¢ 9400 10 i 8~ 109 106i 550~ 1,500i 2,000
Hamburg 132~ 17~ ~84! 206' 240~ %oo; 4oo 4051 475 4921 538~ 6001 7501 ~,00~' 50 : 5o, 58 1001 110~ 120! 170
Holl~oodTwp. 266 314 ~~~ 450~ 500 1,064 [ 1,100 1,060 1,102 1,100~ ~ 1,300 0 20 ~ 27~ ~ 150~ 160~ 170
Newe~rm~n~ ~06[_ ~3 ~38 14~i ~80~ 250 3~0 3O3 ~ 34~[ 3~3 t 346 4eOt 5m~ 8~0 ~0 40, 43[ 5~, ~0~ ~0~ ~40
Victoria 215 427 756r 1,3671 2,400 3,000~ 3,300 1,042 1,425 ~ 2,354 4,025 ~00~ 8,300 80 i 454 ~ 653 1,020, 1,150 ~240
W~coni& ~ ~,~ ~ 3,0001 3,300] 3,5oo2,48s 2,63~ 3,49s; ~,814 ~,500: ~,000~ 8,2oo ~20~,3~0~ ~,948, 3~7 7,00q e,~ooi 9,4oo
~ ~ ~~200 1,550- 1,770
Watedown ~ 658 848 1 078~ 1,800~ 2 300~ 2,500 1,456 1,818 ~ 2,408 3,029 4,700! 5,800 6,200 230 ~ 463 1
Wate~ownTwp. 326 41~ 439~ 478 5~ 800~ 1,200 1,282 '~ 1,429 1,349 1,432 1,500~ 2,100 3,100 150 ] 70i 58 90 2~ 90i 100
Young America Twp. 2121 274 285~ 267~ 300 350 ~50 841 ~ 952~ 916 838 ~ 870i 950[ 1,200 70 I 50!
2004 Develop. Frmwrk 7,937~ 12,011 16,601~ 24,356i 37,030'~ 50,320j 61,590 28,331 ~ 37,046 47,915 70,205 130~210~' 154,540 , [ 18 38,970 47,460 52,430
2002 Blueprint ~ ~ ~ ~ '~
__ ~ ~ 36,020, 46,500 56,800 i -- , ~ 95,950, ~ 141,020 ~ ! ~ 39,400F 42,980 49,33~
Diff. 2002 BP & 2004 DF il I ~ 1,010~ 3,820 i 4,790 ,~ ~I ~, ~ 3,690 13,190~ 13,520 ,~ (I ]~ ( 2,570~ 4 4801 3,100
1998 Blueprint I, 23,900;~ 32,~~ ]. ' 66,160~ 83,210 104,420~, , ,28880, 35,460~ 38,230~
Metrodiff. 2002&2004 j I ~ / 18,580 17,870 9,630 [ ~ i ' 452701 52,160¢ 34,660 I i i 10,0,5J ,2,4851 e,26~
Ca~er % of metro diff. I ~ ! ~--5%I- 21% 50% (~ i ~ ~--25% 39% ~ , i ~ ~ 36%~ 38%%
Current permit file, linked for updating all work sheets, May 1, 2003
Carver Count~ Building Permits, 1990 to 2003
MCD ITotal 90 ITotal 91
Benton Twp. i 41 1
Camden Twp. 5i 3
Carver 1
Chanhassen (Carver Co.)~ 196', 191
Total92 ITota193 ITota194 Total95 ITota196 ITota197 Totat98 ITota199 ITotal00 ITotal011Total02
5i 31 3! 11 41 5( 31 0! ol 2 2
21 7i 8i 41 51 21 4! 9i 749 4 8
201 21 9i 37! 35! 29! 25i 82i 84 72
228i 265:, 379i 476¢ 207i 2781 425i 277 3111 234 300
03 com-
merce
396
Chaska i 116i 171 3201 309i 127i 111! 134! 200! 195i 2471 4451 392
Chaska Twp. i 0 21 2i 0i li 2! 1 0; 21 0! 2i I
Cologne i li 1! 0! 21 441 16', 17i 18! 26! 34! 23! 14
Dahlgren Twp. ! 6'. 91 81 151 15i 8! 11'. 8! 7', 11 11i 5
Hamburg ' 0! 4! 1! 21 1! 2i 3! 3! 3i 1~ 11 0
515
467
5i 21
31
5! 4
Hancock Twp. 0i li 21 4l 1! 01 1; 01 3i 4! 41 1 11
Hollywood Twp.
Laketown Twp.
Mayer
7i 5i 12'0 5! 41 7! 7! 3i 7! 9i 51 9 3!
121 5 141 12; 6! 141 121 61 41 3] 6 51
4i 3i 8! 2; 3! 2!
li 01 3i 0! 21 25 71 70
New Germany 2 3! 1 1 2i 1 0! 21 0i 0 0! 0 0; 0
Norwood Young America 9 12 19 61 14 7 5; 15 6! 1 15 12 48 45
San Francisco Twp. 12 8 6 12 12: 6 8 3 6 3 5i 3 5
Victoria 58 39 77 73 87 75 t00 56 54 56 145 149 3i 97
Waconia 371 32 150 83 91 98 1101 189 1991 186i 210: 153 183i 161
Waconia Twp. 81 7 3 5 21 9 10 121 6i 4 5 6
Watertown 4 6 11 15 16 8 23 151 36! 69' 821 85 841 69
Watertown Twp. 8: 4 5 7 13 i 9 7! 6; 6 i 6 8 4 2
Young America Twp. 1 ' 5 2 3 4 2 2 3 3 1 2i 6 2
, Carver uninc i i ~ i 40
19 = CARVER COUNTY 49i 513 uuz o~u 848i u~/ ,u,~ ~u~,,i ,,~ , ~ ~3 ~__ !330
Carver County Share of Metro Area Population, 1890-2030
% ................................... Development
~ Framework '
X .~"'-Blueprint
.............. \ ..................................................................... ~.._~.~ ....
1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030
35,000
]0,000
~5,000
ZO,O00
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
-5,000
Carver County Population Growth Trends, 1890-2030
Blueprint 2030 (2002) [] Development Framework (2004)1
1890- 1900-1910-1920-1930- 1940-1950-1960-1970-1980- 1990-2000- 2010- 2020-
900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030
Carver County and Metro Area Age Composition, 2000
· Carver Co · Metro Area
Under 10 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+
mm1061
Carver County Age Composition, 1990 and 2000
Under 10 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50~59 60-69 70-79
80+
Eastern Carver County 2030 Household Forecast Comparison
Development Framework vs. Blueprint 2030
[] 2000 Forecast (1998 Blueprint)
.......... ..... II~i ..... Fl'" i ' 2030 Forecasts I'
I ~] II E] Blueprint 2030 (2002)
2030 Household Forecast Comparison for Selected Carver County Cities
Development Framework vs. Blueprint 2030
[] 2000 Forecast (1998 Blueprint)
· 2000 Census
2030 Forecasts
[] Blueprint 2030 (2002)
[] Development Framework (2004)
Hamburg Mayer New Germany
Norwood YA
Watetown
mm1055
2030 Household Forecast Comparison for Selected Carver County Townships
Development Framework vs. Blueprint 2030
[] 2000 Forecast (1998 Blueprint)
I 2000 Census
2030 Forecasts
[] Blueprint 2030 (2002)
[] Development Framework f2004)
Benton Camden Hancock Hollywood San
Francisco
Watertown
Young
Amedca
"In your opinion, what do you think is the
single most important problem facing people
in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area today?"
7o%
APPENDIX
I
CHASKA 2004
POLICE BUDGe- I /
2000-2002
CRIM STATS
Debt service costs for new facilities, particularly those for the fire station and an
addition to the municipal services building will be funded from sources other than
general property tax levies.
The following is a summary for expenditures by department for 2004.
Department
Council $
Administration $
Administrative Services $
Assessment $
Legal $
Community Development $
Engineering $
Elections $
Police
Fire $
Ambulance $
Government Buildings $
Public Works $
Recreation $
Communication $
Transfers - out $
Unallocated $
Total $
2003 2004
Budget Budget Change %
54,071 $ 56,611 $ 2,540 4.7%
225,453 $ 232,845 $ 7,392 3.3%
692,166 $ 729,926 $ 37,760 5.5%
52,564 $ 75,500 $ 22,936 43.6%
38,110 $ 67,063 $ 28,953 76.0%
738,044 $ 772,251 $ 34,207 4.6%
190,613 $ 200,421 $ 9,808 5.1%
5,000 $ 29,590 $ 24,590 491,8%
$ 1,9.3_5,042 $ 2,098,771 $ 163,729 8.5%
497,568 $ 527,753 $ 30,185 6.1%
61,159 $ 48,503 $ (12,656) -20.7%
154,600 $ 161,538 $ 6,938 4.5%
1,766,939 $ 1,931,671 $ 164,732 9.3%
333,131 $ 339,008 $ 5,877 1.8%
102,224 $ 105,161 $ 2,937 2.9%
47,700 $ $ (47,700) -100.0%
133,305 $ $ (133,305) -100.0%
7,027,689 $ 7,376,612 $ 348,923 5.0%
Administrative Servic, es:
Over the past three years additional staff has been a priority in this department, with
the addition of a new accountant, customer service support, and MIS position. Need
for new staff has been driven by additional reporting requirements, expansion of the
city-wide data processing, and general growth in our financial activities. In 2004
administrative services ~taffing levels are anticipated to remain unchanged.
The second emphasis has been to upgrade and support the city-wide data processing
capabilities. Over the past three years our financial system for the general ledger
accounts payable and receivables, have been updated, along with the addition of a new
utility billing and payroll system, which are now fully operational. In addition to a city-
wide fiber network and high speed [nternet service has been provided. To continue to
expand Data Processing, and to replace existing computer hardware/software, we have
budgeted $25,600 for hardware and software upgrades.
Community Development:
As indicated previously, a major trend over the next five-year period will be increased
residential development, with 500 new residential units added annually. Furthermore,
in the five-year period the full expansion of the Chaska Commons is anticipated, with
2004 Budget
Page 8
industrial development decreasing, due to the scarcity of industrial land. Overall, we
are anticipating that Building Department activity and revenues will remain relatively
constant. Currently, the Department has five full time building inspectors, along with a
full time fire marshal, lit is anticipated that through the five-year period, these six full
time positions will be adequate to maintain current inspection levels and thus no new
personnel changes are r'ecommended for 2004.
Although the City has experienced a significant increase in infrastructure improvements,
the current engineering staffing level of a full time City Engineer and an Assistant
Engineer are recommended to remain constant. Additional workload will be picked up
from the City's consulting engineer and engineering services, with these costs funded
directly by projects.
Police
Some years ago, the City Council established a staffing guideline in the Police
Department of one officer per one thousand people. Although this level is slightly less
than the average of 1.2 officers per 1000, for similar sized communities, it was felt to
be appropriate for Cha~!;ka's needs. Currently, the Department has 20 licensed officers,
which is consistent with the 2003 population estimate of 20,831.
Through the five-year program, the population estimate anticipates approximately 1000
new residents added each year, thus the five-year plan antidpates one new police
officer in each of the next five years. The 2004 Budget anticipated the new officer is
added in .luly at a first years cost of $35,000 For over 20 years, the City has
maintained a partnership with the Chaska School District by sharing equally in the cost
of school liaison officer~; who work within the school system. Currently, the school has
three full-time liaison officers, with one assigned to the high school and the other
assigned to support activities in the junior high and elementary grades.
Fire Department
Currently the Department has an authorized
staffing level of 42 volunteers, which was
increased by two positions in 2001. One of
the issues for the Department has been an
increased number of calls, both in fire and
ambulance areas. For example, in 2002 the
department responded to 346 fire calls and
570 medicals for a total of 916 responses.
In 2004 we anticipate more than 900 calls.
The increase of calls i.~; having an impact on both the costs associated with volunteer
salaries, but possibly even more importantly, requiring a significant time commitment
from volunteers. The Department is currently exploring alternative service design
2004 Budget
Page 9
2002 Crime Stats Page I of 2
Reported Unfounded Actua[ Crime Cleared CLeared Percent
Offenses Offenses Rate per by by Cleared
100,000 Arrest Arrest
(AduLt) (Juv.)
2002 Crime
Statistics
Murder
I ~ II ~ II o II o II o II o ii o
Rape
Robbery
Serious Assault
Burglary
Larceny
Auto Theft
Arson
Part 1 Total
Other AssauLts
Forgery/Counterfeit
Fraud
Stoten Property
VandaLism
Weapons
Other Sex Offenses
Narcotics
FamiLy/Children
D.U.I.
Liquor Laws
Disorderly
Vagrancy
Other
Total Part 2
z II 0 II ~ II 11 II ~ II 0 II so
15 II 0 II 15 II 8~ II 17_ II ~ II ~
2 36
4 II o II 4 II 22 II ~ II 2 II 75
4~8 II 20 II ~98 II 22s~ II ~29 II 44 II 4~%
96 II ~o II 8~ II 487 II 64 II 20 II ~7
~6 II 11 II 2s II 141 II 19 II 2 Il 84
0 II 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 II 0
144 II 2 II 142 II 80s II ~4 II 8 II ~s
7 II 0 II 7 II ~9 II 4 II ~ II ~00
2~ II 4 II ~9 II ~07 II 14 II ~ II 89
94 II ~ II 9] II S27 II 7O II 22 II 98
~6 II 4 II ~2 II 68 II ~0 II 0 II 8~
68 II 1 II ~7 II 379 II 46 II ~8 II 9s
o II o II o II o II o II o II o
996 II 4~ II 9S] II S40] II Sga II ~90 II 82%
I Grand Total II 1414 II ~] II ~]S~ II 7660 II 727 II 2]~ II 7~%1
http://www.c haskamn .c om/policeold/2OO2CrimeS tats.h tm 3/1/2004
2001 Crime Stats Page 1 of 2
2001 Crime
Statistics
Murder
Rape
Robbery
Serious Assault
Burglary
Larceny
Auto Theft
Arson
Part 1 Total
Other Assaults
Forsery/Counterfeit
Fraud
Stolen Property
Vandalism
Weapons
Other Sex Offenses
Narcotics
Family/Children
D.U.I.
Liquor Laws
Disorderly
Vasrancy
Other
Total Part 2
Reported Unfounded Actual Crime Cleared Cleared Percent
Offenses Offenses Rate per by by Cteared
100,000 Arrest Arrest
(Adutt) (Juv.)
~ II 1 II 2 II 11 II 1 II o II so
20 II 2 II 18 II ~o~ II 13 II ~ II ~oo
32 II ~ II 31 II 177 II s II ~ II 29
278 II 13 II 26S II 1518 II S6 II 20 II 28
2 II o II 2 II 11 II1 II o II so
~a2 II 2~ II ~s9 II 2057 II 9~ II ~2 II ~4
99 II 4 II 9S II 544 II ~2 II 27 II 9~
2~ II o II 2s II ~49 II 16 II o II 61
28 II 4 II 24 II 137 II ~6 II o II 661
s II ~ II 4 II 22 II 1 II ~ II 100
177 II 2 II 175 II 1002 II 16 II 13 II 16
9 II 0 II 9 II 51 II S II 3 II 88
~S II S II ~0 II S7 ii 7 11211 90
66 II 1 II 6s II 372 II 39 II 24 II 96
9 II o II 9 II s~ II 9 II o II lOOl
111 IIo II 111 II 636 II 109 II 2II ~oo I
7sIIo II 75II q29 ii 36II 37II 971
6~II~ II 60II 3~3 II 3sII ~2II 781
0 II 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 II 0II 0 i
2~s II 9 II 20s II ~0 '11 ~9II ~0~ II 9~I
~9~ II 2~II ~0II ~as II ~ II 2~s II 7~I
I Grand Total II 1279 II ~o II 1229 II 7043 ii 534 II 2s8 II 64Fol
http://www.ci .c haska, mn. us/polic¢old/2001 Cfi meStats, htm 3/1/2004
2000 Crime Stats Page l of 2
2000 Crime
Statistics
Murder
Rape
Robbery
Serious Assau{t
Burgtary
Larceny
Auto Theft
Arson
Part 1 Total
Other Assautts
Forgery/Counterfeit
Fraud
Stoten Property
Vandalism
Weapons
Other Sex Offenses
Narcotics
Famity/Chitdren
D.U.I.
Liquor Laws
Disorderty
Vagrancy
Other
Total Part 2
Reported Unfounded Actual Crime Cleared Cleared Percent
Offenses Offenses Rate per by by Cleared
100,000 Arrest Arrest
(Adult) (Juv.)
o II o II o II o II o II o II N~
371 II ~6 II 3ss II ~88 II 73 II 38 II 3~
~ II o II ~ II ~ II o II o II o
~3 II ~ II ~ II ~8~9 II 96 II 6o II 3s
89 II 2 II 87 II s~o II 6~ II 22 II 9s
10 II 0 II '~0 II 64 II ~ II " II ~,o
~3 II 1 II ~2 II 77 II "'~ II 1 II ~oo
8 II 0 II 8 II ~ II ~ II 3 II ~00
~9 II :z II 197 II 1270 II '~6 II 3~ II ~3
:z:z II o II :z:z II "'~" II 15 II 7 II lOO
zo II 0 II ~0 II 128 II ~ 11811 9~
38 II 0 II 38 II 244 II ~ II ~ II 97
~o6 II o II ~o6 II 683 II-,o:~ II 4 II lOO
51 II 0 II 51 II 3Z8 II 36 II ~ II ~001
~38 II3 II ~3~ II 870 II 8o II 37 II 86
1 II0 II '~II ~' II" II 0II 100
:Z03 II~ II :ZO" II ":Zg~ II ~,9 II '~:~0 II
9~o II ~o II 900 II ~8o~ II 446 II :~"~ II 78
I Grand Total II 1373 II 3~ II ~3~ II 8651 II ~4~ II 324 II ~4 I
http://www.ci.chaska.mn.us/policeold/2000crimestats.htm 3/1/2004
APPENDIX
MAXIMUS STUDY
HOURLY RAI
SUGGESTION
Carver County Sheriff's Office Formula Worksheet
BASE SALARY
Deputy = average of all deputies the in office
Sergeant = average of all sergeants in the office
Commander = actual cost of current Commander
Admin/Coordinator = actual cost of current coordinator
Payroll Clerk = actual cost of current clerk
Records Clerk = average of all records clerks in the office
Patrol Schedule = 25% of Sergeants average wage (sergeant scheduling patrol division)
10.25
PENSION
Total cost of pension minus the state rebate
Number of contract deputies divided by the total sworn deputies x the total rebate = contract rebate
Formula 18.91 x $90,840.00 = $27,266.41 $27,266.41 divided by 18.91 = $1,441.90
63 $1441.90 = amount rebated per contract deputy
WORKERS COMP - $1.71 per $100
Deputy = as required by law
Sergeant = as required by law
Commander = as required by law
Admin Coordinator = as required by law
Records Coordinator = as required by law
Payroll Clerk = as required by law
Patrol Schedule = 25% as required by law
OVERTIME - TOTAL = 212 HOURS AVERAGE PER PATROL DEPUTY
56% of total overtime is charged to general patrol based on previous years call for service
44% of total overtime is charged to contract communities based on previous years calls for service
212 hours x 44% = 94 hours Base salary divided by 2080
Base Salary hourly rate x 1.5 Overtime hourly rate x 94 hours = total overtime charged to contract
Pension and Workers compensation overtime as required by law
HOSPITALIZATION
Family coverage as required by labor contract
MEDICARE
All as required by law = base salary x 1.45%
LIFE INSURANCE/LONG TERM DISABILITY
All as required by labor contract/law
UNIFORM
All as required by labor contract
LONGEVITY
Deputy = average of all deputies in the office
Sergeant = average of all sergeants in the office
Longevity pension and workers compensation are averages of the position
TOTAL BENEFITED SALARY COST = BASE SALARY + BENEFITS
02/17~2004
Carver County Sheriff's Office Formula Worksheet
DRAFT
ESTIMATED CONTRACT =
TOTAL Cf OF HRS ESTIMATED FOR CONTRACT COMMUNITIES
TOTAL TIME ON PATROL
EXAMPLE =
Contract Hours = 31,390 divided by total time on patrol = 1660 hours
1660 time on patrol = total patrol hours minus compensated time away + days off in hours
Formula
Total patrol hours = shift length x days in the year (10.25 x 365) = 3741.25
Days off = 162 x 10.25 = 1660.50 Compensated time away = 420.25 hours
Total time on patrol = 3741.25 hrs minus 1660.25 hrs + 420.25 hrs = 1660 total time on patrol
Formula
31,390
1660 = 18.91 Deputies assigned to contract communities
Deputy Sheriff Cost = benefited salary x the number deputies assigned to contract communities
Example - $67,229 x 18.91 = total contract deputy cost
$1,271,300.39
Shift supervision cost = 6 sergeant's benefited salary x the number of contract deputies supervised divided by
the total number of patrol deputies
Example = 6 x $81,433 x 14.91 deputies supervised = total annual supervision costs
31
$234,999.88
14.91 = total number of deputies (18.91) minus the number of deputies supervised by the Chanhassen sergeant (4)
Example 18.91 minus 4 = 14.91
TOTAL SHIFT SUPERVISION AND EXTRA HOURS SCHEDULED
Total shift supervision =
$234,999.88
PAYROLL/ACCOUNT CLERK
Total benefited cost of employee x 3/4 x 18.91 divided by total employees
Example Total benefited cost = $60,386
3/4 of the employees time is spent on payroll accounting issues
18.91 deputies are assigned to the contract communities
137 total employees in the Sheriff's Office
Formula $60,386 x 3/4 x 18.91
137 -- total cost of employee charged to contract communities
$6,251.27
02/17~2004
Carver County Sheriffs Office Formula Worksheet
DRAFT
SECRETARIAL WORK/RECORDS COORDINATOR
-otal benefited cost x the number of deputies assigned divided by the total number of employees in the office
Example
Formula
Total benefited cost = $52,269
All of the employees time is spent on secretarial and records work for all employees in the office
18.91 deputies are assigned to the contract communities
137 total employees in the Sheriffs Office
$52,269 x 18.91
137 = total cost of employee charged to contract communities
$7,214.65
ADMINISTRATIVE/COORDINATOR/RECORDS
Total benefited cost x 1/2 x number of contract deputies divided by the total number of employees
Example
Formula
Total benefited cost = $73,203
1/2 of the employees time is spent on administrative/records duties for all employees of the office
18.91 deputies are assigned to the contract communities
137 total employees in the Sheriff's Office
$73,203 x 1/2 x 18.91
137 = total cost of employee charged to contract communities
$5,052.07
RECORDS PERSONNEL
Total benefited cost x 2 x the number of contract deputies divided by total sworn employees
Example
Total benefited cost = $39,183
2 full time records personnel are dedicated to contract communities
18.91 deputies are assigned to contract communities
63 total sworn officers in the Sheriff's Office
Formula 39,183 x 2 x 18.91
63 =
total cost charged to contract communities
$23,522.24
PATROL SCHEDULING
25% of administrative sergeants time is spent scheduling the contract deputies
25% of benefited cost of an average sergeant salary is charged to contract communities
$19,061.00
CONTRACT SUPERVISION BY COMMANDER
Total benefited time x 1/2 x # of contract deputies divided by the total # of employees minus jail staff
Example
Total benefited cost = $104,614
1/2 of employees time is spent supervising 90 employees
Formula 18.91 deputies are assigned to contract communities
$104,614 x 1/2 x 18.91
90 = total cost charged to contract communities
SUPPLIES FROM COUNTY LEDGER ACCOUNTS (accounts 6410-6455)
Total cost of supplies used from accounts x the # of contract deputies divided by the total # of employees
Example
Total Supplies = $179,275
18.91 deputies assigned to contract communities
Formula 137 total employees in the Sheriff's Office
$179,275 x 18.91
137=
$10,990.28
total cost charged to contract communities
$24,745.18
02/17/2004
Carver County Sheriff's Office Formula Worksheet
DRAFT
COUNTY OVERHEAD FROM COST ALLOCATION PLAN
Total costs x the number of deputies assigned to the contract divided by the total number of employees
Example
Total Overhead = $79,764
18.91 deputies assigned to contract communities
Formula 137 total employees in the Sheriffs Office
$79,764 x 18.91
137 = total cost charged to contract communities
$11,009.76
TRAINING COSTS FROM COST ACCOUNTING REPORT
Total costs minus state reimbursement x the # of contract deputies divided by the total # of employees
Example
Total cost = $105,361
Reimbursement = $32,000
18.91 deputies assigned to contract communities
Formula 137 total employees in the Sheriff's Office
$105,361 - $32,000 x 18.91
137 =
total cost charged to contract communities
$10,125.96
TOTAL ANNUAL CONTRACT COST
Total cost = total contract deputy cost + total contract supervision cost +
total contract administrative overhead + total contract county overhead
$1,624,272.10
PER HOUR PERSONNEL COSTS FOR CONTRACT SERVICE
Total annual cost of the contract service divided by the total time on patrol x the number of contract deputies
Example
Total contract service = $1,624272.10
Annual patrol hours = 1,660
Formula 18.91 deputies assigned to contract communities
$1,624272.10 divided by 1660 x 18.91 = per hour personnel cost
ANNUAL COST PER PATROL VEHICLE
Estimated cost per vehicle minus estimated salvage value divided by 3 year useful life of vehicle
Example
Estimated cost of vehicle = $21,170
Estimated Salvage value = 10% of estimated cost = $2,100
Formula Useful life = estimated cost minus 10% divided by 3 year life
$21,170 - $2,100 divided by 3 = total annual depreciation of vehicle
$51.74
$6,356.66
02/17~2004
Carver County Sheriff's Office Formula Worksheet
DRAFT
MOBILE COMPUTING DEVICES ESTIMATED COST
Total estimated cost of notebook divided by 3 = useful life of MCD
Example
Total estimated cost of notebook = $3,500
Formula Useful life of notebook = 3 years
$3,500 divided by 3 = total annual depreciation of notebook
$1,166.66
EQUIPMENT ESTIMATED COST
Total cost of equipment minus 10 year useful life
Example
Total cost of equipment = $13,404
Formula Useful life of equipment = 10 years
$13,404 divided by 10 = total annual depreciation of equipment
TOTAL DEPRECIATION
Total annual depreciation from vehicle + total depreciation from MCD + total depreciation from equipment
Formula
$21,170 - $2,100 divided by 3 = total annual depreciation of vehicle +
$3,500 divided by 3 = total annual depreciation +
$13,404 divided by 10 = total annual depreciation =
Total Depreciation
FUEL AND LUBRICATION
Average cost per gallon divided by estimated miles per gallon = fuel cost per mile
Example
Average cost of fuel = $1.55
Formula Estimated miles per gallon = 16
$1.55 divided by 16 = fuel cost per mile
LUBRICATION Total fuel cost = cost per mile x average annual miles
Cost of lubrication divided by mileage between lubes = cost per mile for lubes
Example
Cost of lube = $33.12
Formula Average miles between lubes = 4000
$33.12 divided by 4000 = lube cost per mile
TIRES Total lube cost = cost per mile x average annual miles
Average cost of tires divided by the estimated mileage per set of tires = cost per mile
Example
Average cost of tires = $277.00
Formula Estimated miles per set = 18,000
$277.00 divided by 18,000 = cost per mile
Average annual mileage x cost per mile = total annual cost for tires
Example
Average annual mileage = 49,572
Formula Cost per mile = $0.0154
49,572 x $0.0154 = total annual cost of tires per squad vehicle
$1,340.40
$6,356.66
$1,166.66
$1,340.40
$8,863.72
$0.0968
$4,798.57
$0.00828
$410.46
$0.01540
$763.41
RADIO
Maintenance service fee per year = $87.00
02/17~2004
Carver County Sheriff's Office Formula Worksheet
DRAFT
REPAIR, SUPPLIES AND MECHANIC
Total cost to repair 1 patrol vehicle divided by the average annual mileage = estimated cost per mile
Example
Total repair, supplies, mechanic for 1 patrol vehicle = $3,470
Formula Average annual mileage = 49,572
$3,470 divided by 49,572 = estimated cost per mile
Total repair, supplies, mechanic cost = estimated cost per mile x average miles
INSURANCE
Annual cost of insurance for I patrol car = $1,131
$0.0700
$3,470.04
TOTAL ANNUAL COST FOR 1 PATROL VEHICLE
Total depreciation + total fuel + total lubrication + total tires + radio + total repairs, supplies, mechanic + insurance
Formula
Total depriciation =
Total fuel cost = cost per mile x average annual miles
Total lube cost = cost per mile x average annual miles
49,572 x $0.0154 = total annual cost of tires per squad car
Radio maintenance service fee = $87.00
Total repair, supplies, mechanic cost = est. cost per mile x ave. miles
Annual cost of insurance for 1 patrol car = $1,131
Ttoal annual cost for 1 patrol vehicle
$8,863.72
$4,798.57
$410.46
$763.41
$87.00
$3,470.04
$1,131.00
$19,524.20
TOTAL COST OF PATROL VEHICLES FOR CONTRACT COMMUNITIES
Total number of patrol vehicles assigned to contract communities
total cost for patrol vehicles = number of vehicles assigned to contract communities x annual cost of patrol car
Hourly cost for patrol car = total cost divided by the total number of contract hours
Example
Total contract patrol vehicles = 6
Total cost of contract patrol vehicle = $19,524
Formula Total contract hours = 31,390
6 x $19,524 divided by 31,390 = per hour rate for a patrol car $3.73
TOTAL COST PER HOUR OF THE CONTRACT SERVICE
$1,528,748 divided by 1,660 x 18.91 = per hour personnel cost +
6 x $19,524 divided by 31,390 = per hour rate for a patrol vehicle =
Total houlry contract rate =
$51.74
$3.73
$55.47
02/17/2004
APPENDIX
K
CARVER COUNTY
POLICE CONTRACT
CONTRACT FOR POLICE SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 8'c h day of D e c. , 20 0 3 by and
between the County of Carver, through its Sheriff's Office (hereinafter, "County"), and the
City/Township of
known as the "parties".
Chanhassen
, (hereinafter, Municipality"), and, collectively
WHEREAS, the Municipality desires to enter into a contract with the County whereby the
County will provide law enforcement services within the boundaries of the Municipality; and
WHEREAS, the County agrees to render such services upon the terms and conditions
hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, said contract is authorized by the provisions of Minnesota Statute Section
471.59, as amended;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, it is agreed
between the parties as follows:
ARTICLE I
1. SERVICES
The County agrees to provide police protection within the corporate limits of the
Municipality to the extent and in the maimer hereinafter set forth below:
a) Law enforcement services to be provided by the County shall encompass those duties
and functions, which are the type normally, coming within the jurisdiction of and customarily
rendered by the Carver County Sheriff's Office under the applicable statutes of the State of
Minnesota;
b) The Municipality shall receive police services to be provided by such personnel as
may be assigned by the County using such vehicles and/or equipment as deemed necessary by the
County;
c) The police services contemplated hereby shall include routine patrolling and
responding to police calls within the Municipality;
d) The manner in which such service is rendered, the standards of performance,
discipline of officers, and all matters incident to the performance of such service or the control of
personnel employed to render such service shall be and remain in the control of the County;
e) In the event a dispute arises between the parties concerning the type of service to be
rendered, the level thereof, or the manner in which such service is provided, the County shall retain
sole jurisdiction in determining a solution to said dispute; (i.e., re-assignment of officers, types of
patrol, level of service available/required); and
f) The services contemplated hereby are scheduled police services which will be
provided to the Municipality for the number of contracted hours reasonably anticipated, required, or
requested. It shall not include situations in which, in the opinion of the County, a police emergency
occurs which requires a different use of the officer, patrol vehicle, equipment, or, the performance of
special details relating to law enforcement services. It shall also not include the enforcement of
matters which are primarily administrative or regulatory in nature, i.e., zoning, building code
violations).
ARTICLE II
1. OFF-DUTY, SPECIAL EVENT, OR SPECIAL SERVICES
If the Municipality desires additional services over and above the hours contracted for in this
2
Agreement, the County's "Secondary and Off-Duty" policy (attached hereto as Exhibit A) applies
and the parties will need to execute a separate agreement for those services. The estimated rate
(expense, payroll, vehicle, etc.) for any additional services for 2004 is $51.22/hour.
ARTICLE III
1. COOPERATION AMONG PARTIES
It is hereby agreed that the parties and all of their officers, agents and employees shall render
full cooperation and assistance to the each other, their officers, agents, and employees to facilitate the
provision of the services contemplated herein.
ARTICLE IV
1. PROVISION OF EQUIPMENT
It is agreed that the County shall provide all necessary labor, supervision, equipment,
dispatching, and necessary supplies to maintain and provide the police services to be rendered herein.
2. LIABILITY
The Municipality does not assume any liability for the direct payment of any salaries, wages,
or other compensation to personnel employed by the County to perform the services contemplated
herein.
It is agreed that all personnel employed to render the services contemplated herein shall be
employees of the County and the County shall be responsible for providing worker's compensation
insurance and all other benefits to which such personnel shall become entitled by reason of their
employment with the County.
The parties shall not be deemed to assume liability for any intentional or negligent acts of the
other. Each party agrees that it will hold the other harmless from and shall defend its officers, agents
and employees against any claim for damages resulting from such acts.
3. INSURANCE
The County agrees that all insurance required to adequately cover vehicles, personnel and
equipment used by the County in the provision of the services contemplated herein will be provided
by the County at its own expense.
ARTICLE VI
1. TERM
The term of this contract shall be January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2004.
2. RATE
On or before August 15, 2003, the County shall notify the Municipality of the best estimate
of the per hour rate effective for the proposed 2004 contracts.
3. NOTICE
The Municipality shall notify the County of its intention to contract for police services no
later than October 15, 2003. Said notice shall be in writing and shall be received by the County at
the Office of the Sheriff, Carver County Government Center, Justice Center Building, 606 East
Fourth Street, Chaska, Minnesota 55318-2102.
h~ the event the Municipality shall fail to give notice as required herein, the County shall
conclusively presume that said Municipality does not desire to enter into an agreement with the
County for police services.
If the County does not desire to enter into a contract for police services for 2004, the
Municipality shall be so notified in writing six (6) months prior to the expiration of the current
contract.
ARTICLE VIII
1. HOURS
For performing the services contemplated herein, the Municipality agrees to contract for
17,5 2 0 hours for the year 2004, and to pay the actual cost thereof. The estimated hourly
rate for 2004 is $51.22, for an estimated total yearly payment of $ 8 9 7,3 7 4.4 0
2. PAYMENT
One-half of the total amount due hereunder, or $ 4 4 8,6 8 7.2 0, is to be paid on or before
June 30, 2004, and the remaining one-half, or $ 4 4 8,6 8 7.2 0 is to be paid on or before
November 30, 2004.
The Municipality shall receive credit for its share of any benefit to which it may become
entitled pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 69.011, as amended.
As soon after the end of the year 2004, as reasonably practicable, the County shall perform
calculations to determine if the estimated hourly rate for 2004 reflects the actual cost of hourly
service. The County shall promptly notify the Municipality of said actual cost, and if the actual cost
is higher the Municipality shall pay to the County the difference between the estimated amount and
actual cost. If the actual cost is lower, the County shall refund to the Municipality said difference.
In the event the actual cost exceeds the estimated hourly rate, the Municipality shall pay the
difference within 60 days of receipt of notice from the County of the amount due. If the Municipality
cannot pay the full amount due within 60 days, payment must be made in two equal installments
concurrent with the semi-annual payments due for 2005 police contracts, or if the Municipality elects
not to contract for the following year, the payment shall still be due at such semi-annual periods.
Payments not made within the 60 day time period shall be subject to the statutory annual rate
of interest on the balance due.
In the event actual cost is less than the estimated hourly rate, the County shall refund to the
Municipality the difference under the same terms and conditions stated above.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, the Municipality has caused this agreement to be executed by its
Mayor andits City Manager
by the authority of its governing body adopted by Resolution number
dayof December ., 20 0.3
MUNICIPALITY:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By
Title
Date
n/a onthe 8th
Mayor
December 8, 2003
By v
Title City Nanager
Date December 8, 2003
IN WITNESS THEREOF, the County of Carver has caused this Agreement to be executed
by its Chair and attested by its Administrator pnrsuant to the authority of the Board of County
Commissioners by Resolution number duly adopted on the day of
,20
Carver
COUNTY OF CARVER:
l)ate /~ /~
ATTEST:
l)avid
Interim Couff~' Administrator
Carver County Auditor
Date
EXHIBIT "A"
CARVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
POLICY MANUAL
Policy: 1052
Issue Date: November 1, 2002
Reference:
Subject: Secondary and Off-Duty Contract
Employment
Page(s): 2
Chapter: Personnel and Activities
1052 SECONDARY AND OFF-DUTY CONTRACT EMPLOYMENT
The Sheriff's Office shall provide outside and off-duty employment guidelines to employees.
1052.1 DEFINITIONS
1052.1.1 Employment: Any provision of service, whether for fee or other service, not
including volunteer work for charitable organizations or military service in the Reserves or
National Guard.
1052.1.2 Outside Employment: Employment ora non-police nature, which provides no real
or implied law enforcement service to the employer and is not performed during assigned
hours of duty.
1052.1.3 Off-Duty Contract Emploment: Any service that is conditioned on the actual or
potential use of law enforcement powers by the employee, whereby the service is contracted
through the Sheriff's Office.
1052.2 OUTSIDE EMPLOYMENT
Employees may engage in outside employment that meet the following criteria:
A) Employment must present no potential conflict of interest between duties as a Sheriff's
Office employee and requirements of the outside employer.
B) Employment that does not constitute a threat to the status or dignity of law enforcement.
C) Employees desiring outside employment shall complete a Request for Outside Employment
form on an annual basis. The Sheriff and County Administrator evaluate requests for such
employment on an individual basis.
Policy 1052
Revision: December 6, 2002
Page I
Policy: 1052
Subject: Secondary and Off-DuD, Contract
Employment
1052.3 OFF-DUTY CONTRACT EMPLOYMENT
All off-duty contract employment must be authorized in advance by the Sheriff or designee.
A) An approved contract will be completed.
B) Contracted Services Procedures
1) Employees assigned to a contracted service are working for the Sheriff's Office, not the
individual or company that contracted for service.
2) The patrol shift supervisor is responsible for providing supervision and guidance to the
employee so assigned.
3) Employees so assigned are to cooperate with the individual contractor(s) as long as the
actions reqi~ested are consistent with Office regulations and applicable law. If the
request cannot be fulfilled, the employee shall explain why.
4) Any disagreements on the service between the contractor and employee that cmmot be
resolved shall be referred immediately to the shift supervisor for clarification.
5) All employee payments for contract services will be made using established payroll
procedures.
1052.4 LIMITATIONS ON OUTSIDE AND OFF-DUTY EMPLOYMENT
^)
In order to be eligible for outside and/or off-duty employment, an employee shall:
1) have completed their probationary period.
2) not be on medical or other leave due to sickness, injury, or disability.
3) have obtained approval for the request(s) for outside or off-duty employrnent.
B) An employee may work outside or off-duty employment where total hours, in combination
with regular duty hours, do not conflict or interfere with the employee's primary duties.
c)
An employee engaged in any outside or off-duty employment is subject to call-out in case
of an emergency, and may be expected to leave their outside or off-duty employment in
such situations.
Policy 1052
Revision: Septcmber 13, 2002
Page 2
ADDENDUM TO 2004
CONTRACT FOR POLICE SERVICES
THIS ADDENDUM, made and entered into this 8th day of December, 2003, by and between the
COUNTY OF CARVER, through its Sheriff's Office (hereinafter "County"), and the CITY OF
CHANHASSEN (hereinafter "Municipality"), and collectively known as the parties.
ADDENDUM. The parties have entered into a Contract for Police Service dated
December 8, 2003 ("Police Contract"). This is an addendum to the Police Contract. The
Police Contract shall remain in full force and effect except as modified by this addendum.
SERGEANT. The sergeant assigned by the County to the Municipality shall be subject to
the approval of the Chanhassen City Manager. The assigned sergeant shall:
· Supervise the deputies assigned to the Municipality;
· Be the liaison between the County and the Municipality for the Police Contract;
· Regularly attend Chanhassen Department Head meetings;
· Attend a least one Chanhassen City Council meeting per month; and
· Provide direction to and coordination with Municipality's Community Service Officer.
·
Salary *
· Benefits
Vehicle & Equip
61,999.15
2,000.00
3,099.96
67,099.10
6,240.22
8,567.28
433.92
118.92
972.94
879.00
362.34
575.00
4,800.00
90,048.71
(29.5797 x 2096 hrs)
Estimated OT
Longevity
Total estimated salary
PERA (9.3%)
Health
Dental
Life
Medicare (1.45%)
Work Comp. (1.31%)
Long Term Disability (.54%)
Uniform Allowance
Vehicle & Equipment costs
2004 Salary, Benefits, Vehicle & Equipment
SPECIAL EVENTS. The Municipality has several community and crime prevention events
annually. To cover these events, contract patrol deputies are rescheduled from their "normal
patrol duties." This has created problems for scheduling deputies to cover calls for service
and participate in these important crime prevention activities. The municipality agrees to pay
personnel costs of assigning additional deputies to participate in these events. These cost are
covered under the basic police contract, Article II. 1. Off-Duty, Special Event, or Special
Services.
WORK PLAN/PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS. The parties shall develop a work
plan to guide the law enforcement services in the City of Chanhassen.
* Salary includes: - estimated 3% COLA increase (2004 labor contract bas not been settled)
- additional hours due to leap year (2096 hfs vs 2080 hrs)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Municipality has caused this Addendum to be executed by its
Mayor and its City Manager by the Authority of its governing body this 8th day of
December, 2003.
BY: / C-._',--,.-~. ~ tlrS~'~-
Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor
Todd Gerhardt, City Manager
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County has caused this Addendum to be executed by its Chair
and attested by its Administrator pursuant to the authority of the Board of County Commissioners
by Resolution Number duly adopted on the A3 day of ~*_ -r'/ ,2003.
County of Carver
· ' Ch'-~'~r, /' -
Date:
Carver County Board of Commissioners
ATTI~T:
Dave Hemze, ~r County Interim Administrator
Date:
Mark Lundg~eXla} Ca~r County Auditor
Date:
'nfi i an, c~ver County Sheriff
APPENDIX
L
CHANHASSEN
"CALLS FOR
SERVICE"
2000-2003
2003 City
2000 2001 2002 2003 Carver Percentage
Chanhassen Chanhassen Chanhassen Chanhassen Percent County of Total
Calls for Calls for Calls for Calls for Change Calls for 2003 County
Service Service Service Service 2000- 2003 Service Calls
Criminal
Assault 52 44 45 37 -29% 158 23%
Burglary 41 43 36 591 44% 142 42%
Drug violation 25 29 23 34 36% 106 32%
Homicide 0 0 0 0 0 0%
Traffic-Alcohol 152 173 151 149 -2% 437 34%
Misc. Criminal 302 243 210 145 -52% 469 31%
Property Damage 472 350 332 334 -29% 983 34%
Robbery 2 5 2 2 0% 3 67%
Sex Crime 23 16 6 15 -35% 54 28%
Theft 429 433 398 447 4% 1150 39%
Theft-Vehicle 16 27 31 32 100%1 115 28%
Total - Criminal 1514 1363 1234 1254 -17% 3617
Non-Criminal
Disturb Peace/Privacy 428 480 452 511 19% 1484 34%
Misc. Non Criminal 700 738 682 755 8% 2130 35%
Lock out 612 604 307 114 -81% 165 69%
Alarm 892 901 859 958 7% 1790 54%
Domestic 98 135 88 113 15% 377 30%
Missing Person/Runaways 107 82 64 73 -32% 280 26%'
Abuse/Neglect 58 45 17 79 36% 297 27%
Motorist Assist 280 355 367 432 54% 972 44%
Animal 387 406 364 454 17% 1083 42%
Medical 443 466 423 527 19% 1475 36%
House/Business Check 44 30 31 30 -32% 65 46%
Assist Other Agency 103 79 113 127 23% 691 18%
Fire Call 275 256 218 317 15% 758 42%
Prowler 36 13 24 12 -67% 38 32%
Mental Health 35 41 36 39 11% 125 31%
Civil Process 2 2 8 4 100% 32 13%
Transport 26 7 11 10 -62% 157 6%
Warrant Service 26 51 30 57 119% 233 24%
Boat and Water 61 53 96 80 31% 189 42%
Snowmobile 0 35 28 37 109 34%
Gun Permit - Acquire 81 117 83 109 35% 363 30%
Gun Permit - Carry 5 6 1 61 1120% 244 25%
Suspicious Activity 612 865 858 1026 68% 2347 44%
Open Door 16 24 24 21 31% 76 28%
Auto Accd - Prop Damage 545 533 513 565 4% 1057 53%
Auto Accd - Injury 108 105 72 103 -5% 298 35%
Auto Accd - Fatal 0 2 2 3 8 38%
Traffic 1611 2613 2730 3449 114% 1869 185%
Traffic - Special 0 56 142 543 775 70%
Total - Non-Criminal 7591 9100 8643 10,609 40% 19487
2000-2003
2000 2001 2002 2003 Increase
City of Chanhassen Population 20,321 20,982 21,561 22,376 10%
Carver County Population 70,205 75,312
City Population as % of Carver
County 29% 29%
Carver County Sheriff's Office
Base Level Services
Administrative Services:
· 9-1-1 Dispatch
· County Wide Radio System
· Day Care/Foster Care/Adoption
Checks
Jail Services:
· Booking Prisoners
· Adult Detention
· Juvenile Detention
· Intoxilyzer Test Services
Support Services:
· Civil Process Service
· Court Safety & Security
· Prisoner Transport
· Warrant Service
· Gun & Explosive Permits
Operations Services:
· Crime Scene Processing
· Crime Lab
· Evidence & Property Maintenance
· Major Crime Investigative
Assistance
· Dive Team Search/Drowning
Recovery
· Predatory Offender Program
City of Chanhassen
Key Services Provided
Prosecution (through City Attorney)
Crime Prevention:
· Operation Identification
· Neighborhood Watch
· Business Risk Management/Loss
Prevention
· Education
Communicate with Victims of Crimes
Community Service Officers:
· Animal Patrol
· Assist with emergency calls and traffic
control
· Code Enforcement Issues
Emergency Response:
· Ambulance Services (through Ridgeview)
· First Responder (Fire Department)
Code Enforcement:
Carver County Sheriff's Department
(through contract):
· Base Level Services
· Patrol Chief Law Enforcement Officer
(Jim Olson)