Loading...
1b. Roberts Automatic Products, Prel Plat & Site Plan Review / 6 . Al I . % ' (:: ITY O F P.C. DATE: Mar. 21, 1990' - HANHASEII C.C. LATE: Apr. 9, 1990 1 • CASE NO: 90-3 Site Plan m-7, 90-2 Subdivision IPrepared by: Al-Jaff/v STAFF REPORT i . 1 PROPOSAL: 1) Preliminary Plat/Final plat to replat two lots and one outlot of Chan Lakes Business Park 2nd Addition 2 ) Site Plan Review for a 48,200 square foot I Z Office/Manufacturing Facility a._k,,-, t,, rf., ,f i—,f-tc44.3ilr I2 ' LOCATION: 880 Lake Drive p: i -_ x.. R APPLICANT: Robert Worthington e ., _`f-6--1 d-_ IOpus Corporation Da. 917 9900 Bren Road East P.O. Box 15 —� - Minnetonka, MN 55343 4L9_ 90 PRESENT ZONING: IOP, Industrial Office Park ACREAGE: 5.725 acres I DENSITY: N/A ADJACENT ZONING ' AND LAND USE: N- IOP; RR and Instant Web Is- IOP; Empak Corp. E- IOP; Rosemount and Lake Susan W- I0; Lutheran Church of the Living Christ IIWATER AND SEWER: Available to the site Q PHYSICAL CHARAC. : Vacant 5.7 acres - The Roberts Automatic I I— site was altered due to the construction of Lake Drive and the extension of a water and sewer line which is 0 located to the west. of the site. There is virtually no significant vegetation on this parcel except for a single 30" oak tree found near I tiiim the east property line. The site slopes down from a 970' elevation at the northeast corner adjacent to the RR tracks to 912 ' at the south- west corner adjacent to Lake Drive. The area subject to the sub- II ") division request is larger and extends east including the site of the Lutheran Church of the Living Christ and land that is being acquired by the city for drainage purposes. 2000 LAND USE PLAN: Industrial w 1 1--1-•4. FriicW Otiri UPI. '-.RR 1; g r��� .ft . tcnMi1i -gcr.►. . - - .,1 ...Jilin.,-:6355- - R1 — OI 1 RI" vo ./ - R 12' � Ow ..►.0 ..w 1011;:i mu ver.=OUL E VA R• — sari in �' IERC UP pr SG � III I BANE 1 P ! t CAL IAD A E.a�* ��" 1 14 Ooti I G NW AI $ ?Pilkct‘(* % �� - I 01 \,44 •HURCH S , ' ` -R O POS D SITE `•a 411111.it . I __I 5`.. ' fillar: - ' - -- -----7 7=- I ��® � .. !� '�R y o LAKE SUSAN 4 )j= If.SIr4 CO�� RD -•.... ...;it; of ' __�� it4 03 4 o 3 PUD-R I y 66 TM ST. ' . . 4 . , imi At, �, -- IIu%� ins 4‘v ollyid,#,�. - _ RSF 2 grin ia ' ee AN N RSF=1„,„frei 1 W 11 111 1 S i 1 B. EVARD R. 18 " C-... • >/ C W I t II Roberts Automatic March 21, 1990 Page 2 PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicant is requesting site plan and preliminary plat approval to construct 48,200 square foot office/manufacturing facility for Roberts Automatic. Roberts Automatic is a manufacturer of screw machine parts. There are two applications being considered. The first being site plan approval for the Roberts Automatic building. The second being a related request for a subdivision approval that will have the affect of transferring property between the Roberts Automatic site and the Church of the Living Christ to the east and also result in the creation of a small lot at the east end of the church property that is going to be acquired by the city for drainage purposes. The site plan request is a fairly simple one. The building is situated parallel to the street with a parking area located in the front and loading docks in a somewhat concealed location on the west side of the building. Plans also illustrate a concept for an 18,400 square foot expansion to the building. No approvals are being sought for the expansion at this time and additional site plan approval will be required for it in the future. In general the site plan is well designed. Access, grading, drainage and utilities pose no unusual problems although a number of detail modifications have been requested by city staff. Appropriate conditions are provided to resolve these issues. Staff has raised some concerns with the quality of the architectural design of the building. The building is constructed of painted textured precast panels. The site is in a relatively secluded location. Site landscaping is generally of a high quality although again, some minor modifications have been recommended by staff, in particular to improve screening of the truck loading area. The subdivision request is also a fairly simple one. Only minor modifications have been requested to insure that all the appropriate easements are provided. There are no variances attached to either the site plan or subdivision requests. Staff is recommending that both the requests be approved subject to appropriate conditions. GENERAL SITE PLAN/ARCHITECTURE , The site is located to the north of Lake Drive which services the Empak and the Lutheran Church of the Living Christ sites. Site planning is fairly straight forward. The building is situated parallel to Lake Drive where access is gained. Parking is located to the front with a truck loading area found on the west side where 1 II , Roberts Automatic March 21, 1990 Page 3 it is screened from off-site views by the building, railroad tracks, landscaping and by a change in elevation from Lake Drive. Building architecture is functional. The proposal calls for the use of painted textured precast panels for the entire building with ' a 2 inch reveal line. In our opinion, the quality of the design is below the standard set by Empak to the west and by the church to the east. The proposal calls for the use of painted textured precast panels for the entire building. This was a clarification made by the architect at the Planning Commission meeting since it is not reflected on the submitted plans. In staff's opinion, the building design is acceptable in that it meets minimal district requirements although we would have preferred a better quality of design. The rooftop equipment is proposed to be screened by materials identical or similar to the wall panel finish. This is an innovative approach that avoids the use of rooftop fences that, in our opinion, are unsightly as well as being a maintenance problem. On the east side of the building is a proposed outdoor eating area. This area is to be screened by trees to separate it from the parking area located on the south portion of the site. Plans illustrate a conceptual 18,400 square foot expansion on the east side of the building. The expansion is generally consistent with the overall site plan. Staff is concerned that the 30" oak tree that is the only one on the site is likely to be lost due to grading. Amended site plan approval will be required whenever ' construction is proposed. The applicant has not provided any information on or shown a location for trash storage on the site. At the Planning Commission ' meeting it was indicated that external trash storage is desired. Plans should be revised to illustrate an acceptable trash enclosure made of materials compatible with the primary structure. PARKING/INTERIOR CIRCULATION ' Parking requirements for the office portion of the building is 3 parking stalls per 1,000 square feet which amounts to 19 parking stalls. The manufacturing facility is proposed to accommodate a maximum of 50 employees. Fifty parking stalls will be required as the parking ordinance calls for one parking stall per employee. The warehouse and shipping area has a total area of 12,350 square feet which translates to 12 parking stalls as the ordinance ' requires one parking stall per 1,000 square feet. Total required parking stalls are 81. The applicant is proposing 126 parking stalls which exceeds the minimum requirements and which will I II Roberts Automatic II March 21, 1990 Page 4 IIaccommodate the future expansion. Three handicapped parking stalls are also provided. PARKING TABLE 1 USE AREA PARKING TOTAL I Office 6,270 s. f. 3 stall/1000 s. f. 19 Manufacturing 29,580 s. f. 1 stall/employee 50 II Warehouse/ 12,350 s.f. 1 stall/1,000 s. f. 12 shipping Required total 81 stalls I Provided total 126 stalls Based upon this analysis, staff concludes that parking requirements I have been satisified. The islands in the parking lot have created an issue of concern to II the Fire Department as the proposed site plan does not show the angle of the curves and turning movements by fire trucks might be hindered. Staff is recommending the applicant revise the plan as I necessary for approval by the Fire Marshal. ACCESS The plans proposed two 24 foot wide driveway access points onto I Lake Drive. It is anticipated that the westerly access will be used by trucks destined to the loading docks. The Engineering I Department is requesting that the westerly access be widened to 36 feet to accommodate truck turning movements. LANDSCAPING I The landscaping plan is generally well conceived although it is deficient in several areas. The Lake Drive frontage has plantings II along the boulevard with parking areas screened by the change in elevation between the street and parking lot. We also believe that landscaping in front of the building and in the parking lot is well II designed. As part of their arrangement with the church, additional screening comprised of spruce trees will be located on the adjacent church II property. This is being done for several reasons. Due to grades and the location of trees on the church site, it is believed that the screening would be more effective in this area. In addition, I it tends to free up the area designated for the future expansion of the Roberts Automatic building. Staff supports the concept but is II II II , Roberts Automatic March 21, 1990 Page 5 proposing to require the creation of a landscaping easement over the church site to allow Roberts to install and maintain the trees. We believe the screening of the truck loading area is inadequate. While we note that the building and site grades will 11 obscure some views of this area, we believe a more active program is required. To this end we are proposing that the size of the spruce trees be increased from 6'8 to 10-12 ' and that the trees extend up to the northwest corner of the loading area. Staff is somewhat concerned over screening the north side of the building from Hwy. 5. It is not possible to provide signficant ' landscaping in this area due to the location of a power line easement. However, we believe that direct views of the site from the highway will be limited by distance, grades, the location of the railroad track embankment and by trees located on church parcel. Under the revised site plan ordinance financial guarantees for landscaping and other site improvements are required. LIGHTING ' Lighting locations are illustrated on the plan but fixture type needs to be specified. Only shielded fixtures are allowed and the applicant must demonstrate that there is no more than 0.5 foot candles of light at the property line. SIGNAGE Stop signs must be posted on the driveway access to Lake Drive. Signage plans should be submitted for staff review and city permit. ' GRADING/DRAINAGE The site generally drains to the south on Lake Drive. The water flow is intercepted by storm sewer which eventually drain into the city's storm sewer on Lake Drive and along the westerly side of the property. Additional catch basins are required to intercept storm ' runoff prior to it draining out on Lake Drive. An off-site ponding area which was constructed in conjunction with the Lake Drive project, will be utilized to handle the water that will be generated. The majority of the site is proposed to be graded. Fairly steep slopes will be created along the northerly portion of the site where erosion control blankets are required to stabilize the slope and minimize erosion. Erosion control is also required along the northeast and east side of the parking lot. Erosion control fence ' is also proposed along the southerly and westerly perimeters of the 1 , 1 Roberts Automatic March 21, 1990 Page 6 lot. Type III erosion control is to be used instead of the proposed Type II. The applicant is also proposing to grade the northerly portion of the site where gas and power line easements are located. Before such action takes place, the applicant must obtain appropriate permits from the respective utilities. PUBLIC UTILITIES City water and sewer are available on Lake Drive. Two fire hydrants are proposed. The Fire Department is requesting additional data regarding water flow in the two hydrants on dead end mains versus two hydrants on a 6 inch looped system. The westerly proposed parking and landscaping encroach upon a 25 foot wide drainage and utility easement recently acquired in conjunction with the Lake Drive project for extension of a 36 inch storm sewer along the westerly common lot line. The Engineering Department is requesting that this encroachment be permitted under the condition that the applicant enters into a hold harmless agreement with the city to acknowledge the city will not be held responsible for any damage or restoration costs to the parking lot or landscaping while performing maintenance to the storm sewer line. The plans should be revised to indicate concrete curb and gutter around the parking lots or driveways. COMPLIANCE TABLE - IOP DISTRICT , Ordinance Proposed Building Height 4 stories 1 story I Building Setback N-10 ' E-10' N-50 ' E-191 ' S-30' W-10' S-100' W-115 ' Parking stalls 81 stalls 126 stalls Parking Setback N-N/A E-10' N-N/A E-42 ' 1 S-30' W-10' S-30' E-10 ' Lot Coverage 70% 43% 1 Lot Area 1 acre 5.725 acres Variances Required - none I 1 II , Roberts Automatic March 21, 1990 Page 7 PRELIMINARY PLAT ' The applicants are requesting preliminary plat approval to redistribute land to facilitate development. As part of the plat, land will be exchanged between the Roberts Automatic site and church site. In addition, a small lot will be created at the east end of the church parcel. This is being acquired by the city for drainage purposes. Designated as Lot 3 on the plat it should be redesignated as an outlot since it is unbuildable. An access ' easement for the church driveway should also be provided. Lastly, a 25 foot wide drainage and utility easement over the west side of Lot 1, Block 1 is required. In other respects, the plat is acceptable. The Roberts Automatic site will be required to pay a park dedication fee at the time building permit is required. ' PLANNING COMMISSION UPDATE/ACTION On March 21, 1990, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the site plan and preliminary and final plat for Roberts Automatic. CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the following motion: "The City Council approves Site Plan #90-3 as shown on the plat dated March 5, 1990, subject to the following conditions: 1. Provide information showing location of trash storage on the site. Provide final details on rooftop screening for approval ' by staff. 2 . The applicant provide a detailed signage plan and apply for city permits. Post stop signs on the driveway access to Lake Drive. Provide details on site lighting for approval by city staff. 3 . Revise the landscape plans as recommended in the report to improve screening of the truck loading area. Provide staff with a detailed cost estimate of landscaping to be used in calculating the required financial guarantees. These guarantees must be posted prior to building permit issuance. 4. The applicant shall obtain and comply with all conditions of the Watershed District permit. 5. The westerly driveway access shall be widened to 36 feet and the apron area shall be concrete instead of bituminous. Revise internal circulation as required to facilitate access by city fire equipment, for approval by the City Fire Marshal. i . I Roberts Automatic March 21, 1990 Page 8 6. The applicant shall add additional catch basins to intercept storm runoff before draining out onto Lake Drive and at the entrance to the truck loading dock area. The storm sewer system shall be redesigned for a 10 year storm frequency and revised drainage calculations provided to the City. B-612 concrete curb and gutter shall be constructed around all parking lots and driveways. 7. Type III erosion control shall be used along Lake Drive and added to the northeast and east corner of the front parking lot. Straw bales and silt fence shall be deployed to protect CB-2 from silt and sediment. Wood fiber blankets shall be installed along the distrubed side slopes in the northeast corner of the site. After sodding, the erosion control shall be relocated to the sod/seed line. The southwest corner of the site should be sodded to the north edge of the parking lot. "The City Council approves Preliminary and Final Plat #90-2 as shown on the plat dated March 5, 1990 and subject to the following conditions: 1. Revise the plat to designate Lot 3 as an outlot and provide an access easement over the church driveway. An additional 25 foot wide drainage and utility easement over the west side of Lot 1, Block 1 is required. The Roberts Automatic site shall pay the required park dedication fee at the time building permits are requested. 2. The applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City to allow construction of the parking lot and landscaping within the City's 25 foot drainage and utility easement on the west side of the property and releasing the city from any restoration obligation for the parking lot and landscaping in the event sewer repairs are necessary. 3. Appropriate gas and power company permits shall be obtained 1 prior to grading within the utility easements along the north and east corner of the site. 4. No utility cuts shall be allowed to Lake Drive without the , approval of the City Engineer." ATTACHMENTS 1 1. Reduced copy of site plan, grading plan, landscape plan, floor plan and building elevations. 1 2. Letter from Opus dated February 19, 1990. 3. Memo from City Engineer dated March 14, 1990. 4. Memo from Fire Marshal dated February 23, 1990. , I II , Roberts Automatic March 21, 1990 Page 9 Attachments (continued) 5. Planning Commission minutes dated March 21, 1990. 6. Site plan and preliminary/final plat dated March 5, 1990. I I I I I I I . 'V a 'D 1 ® -1 o0 Dorn I • -1 ): %0 _ I z • I . -=� I• \ \ \..../1".:".... 4...„,...... C---.1......":„ -..,. , ,...., . .. _ s . ..--, ., . •. , r. y s, _ t-- , , N. 7 ♦ i y , • 1, , 11 1 • . I\ \ { % 4 Ii , ( 1 1 gl !�• I \I i I 19 iii [i n' i 1 1 1 % ! i' T 'ji Tim , � • 111. : " I e iZt• le Ik. 4 i 1 s_ I • i _i . . . .. . P i I' ailsra i 11.1i i 1 I 4114 ' J. i •T II i ! - *= MOM SOTOisliC P000C1S.MC. sm.. mar PA1 us Omission.MIL Ina ix: " 0 OPUS COIrORAMPLIII OMNI S• en PIM 1• _ 1-11 • I..,, ,,, r,i . . ,. .. r, fo i t .it — — I jarr4T1j t i y . . a F i• f . ill: - ' �k I o . / : t ,,1 I I ' I ` 1 , \ /. ......::;:■#:',://.4. 1 jii .t ie\' \.. \ ; ..anarra ''' ,- ' .,C. \ attl 1\ . ill • . 1 i _ ; :.\e ‘ t.4 , * ) .t ! tr. , Ik.k. ,--.. -. - 1 I i ‘ ,....,v. ‘,,,, 1 ., ,,,.. . : : .. , .:,, ,, : - . . v \ „%,: .%,.. \ ,t A ;..virikhr. . t. , , , litroms, .., . . i ) . I 1 —11111-4-11 i.I. • 2. :lit: .:: I lit . I IlI "" t "IP . .. ' : . .:*" .. 141.1. s6• •.1', r �. Ili 4141 _4141.. •, _ • -4 r ;%'. I t i l � !_ttttlit T 1 f , !I ' I • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • ••.. 1 ill i iihI 'ii 1 i'iiIiiiIi!iiii!iii! , 1E If 11 r i 0 tw 1146.0fil I 1II!1ThH; I 41 I I 1 •o.s.s.r►wx INISMICES.•ale. ` _;CI �...� w .:.:.i: a lf1'IK t�011t'OfiAi10N M�+M. n►aw��e ewwK way "'" w ` .�e `I! 411 li Pill I i 0 i I ft,1 v*,--_;„,--_. iiii1t1 hi •� !f A I 1 in ,i,I I■i T 'Hi a t it l'pl i M I ei, w � el ;HMI PI Ifs tii;[4 w5t jfl' ill!kJ1 Ei �1�iti :<< ii ftl�ttl��!1 gills •: le 0 a oc it ea N 1 '104:4'.a.7...,..;.. - IV* it . ._ 1 P • _ - = -� �=Is.'s ' ' 4�\ .. - * --e . ... ..1„0.--;f ,„‘" : , -A. 1 . ... olii Aim`♦ i `�is \ C of ..., ;411 7......... ,...,.a i I , . 1 1 . • 0 a 4 $ �y •so I• _ • _ ‘ - '1‘i.--1 -_ 111 - ill '....- It 1 • 1 ::414rIP 1 I \ • ... E` t131 L • 19 1 iiiq _t ;41 111111 ; II .... .4 _ 6. . . . a, .. , • I. • Iv , 1 . ., .„ . „ ti._ — ls.. 45, I': I Ir1'iI ICI '1410,01 f i1 .,. I iiij 1 „V r■ a a If.• ' I1 I II ICI `I 44444 • • i ' : - - I -• - _. �� - wa+►n.uror.ne rwoarer•�e � • t• t OMIT COM'ORA1 r ..: ,.. 9 . 9 9 11111af 47 r ee • • ..4Q 4 I i I it - . it • 1. ,.�1 --•----+ .. _ . . . -._ -t II! I . .1-7 . ' ' - E 0 t --- - III -•• ::;___Al. I - ; I 0 t _ . , , _! . _ .. % 0 1 I I . . I . it.'‘ I 1 • . _ . . •- _ _ . . t -... ' i • ,. • 1 1 . 3 "f j i • I 0 ' 'IV -1----"—.."'-'0 ? L. I ; I f 1 ll '-' - il - - D .. , _ • -. - , . 0 fa .-_ I 1 "' yr: — --• -- - -- - — — - • 41 ---q I E O . qi 7---0 1 . g 4. ; p 1 o _— � — — — - . T- - 45 11. . 1 1 T - • • . . - Olim ees•.rr•...s.....s s,.s. .,, .v ..� :471.17-7.-•:.-"..' ,«!R commune s Ii _ taw►— r. .�r. '. f a•rs...s••w ! , , ----0 I - - A - if - 4! 1 1 --19 ! , 1 ..-.-........-....1 .0 - - ..1 '- ...': . \I— .7— . - 71 . , +'F---I I-, -i i -0i! E; i- I ,.i _5Zr _.o I 0 i , ae F.-7--*.7i --- , - • a ,,.,,,_,_, I Ft 4-0 m 1 ill : --O ,. ki ii C II --p �� I ;,iced • ., . 0/ ____. 1 Mil '1 . . __�� . ,lie. 1f L/ �tll�'-� 11 —'-' �'r�` H I • I. ,1, / •••••<) i. ig-c)It 1 _ pool . ; f- -i--- •-40 . . _c) ----0 , C - L 'mum arroftres PIIIMING.a& ........ frar ........ ,wA r�-tY� ,_ 7.w. r r.l PIA• OPUS CORPORAT, N DESIGNERS•BUILDERS DEVELOPERS • 800 Opus Center Mailing Address 9900 Bren Road East P O.Box 150 ' Minnetonka,Minnesota 55343 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440 (612)936-4444 ' February 19, 1990 Mr. Paul Krause Director, Department of City Planning City of Chanhassen 690 Coulter Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Roberts Automatic Products Facility 1 Dear Paul: Opus Corporation is pleased to submit, in behalf of Roberts Automatic Products, Inc. , the enclosed application and sets of drawings for the replatting and site plan review and approval of a 48,200 sq. ft. office/manufacturing facility for Roberts Automatic Products to be constructed on a 5.7 acre undeveloped site in our Chan Lakes Business Park. The subject site is located in our Chan Lakes Business Park (see the attached site location map. ) It adjoins the Lutheran Church of the Living Christ property. The owners of Roberts and the Church have worked out an exchange of portions of their property to eliminate some inefficiencies ' found with the parcel configuration of the existing site (Lot 3, Block 2, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park, 2nd Addition) proposed for the subject facility. The exchange and property reconfiguration is reflected in the proposed replatting request which is a part of the enclosed application. Roberts Automatic Products is a third generation family owned business founded in 1947. Roberts Automatic Products supplies quality screw ' machine parts to many of the nation's most respected manufacturers. Roberts has been located in Edina for over 20 years and employs over 90 people. ' The enclosed plans show the character and design of the proposed Roberts Automatic Products building. It will be a decorative precast building with an appearance similar to and compatible with other office/ ' manufacturing buildings constructed by Opus in Chan Lakes Business Park. The 48,200 sq. ft. initial phase of construction will contain 41,930 sq. ' ft. of manufacturing/warehouse and 6,270 sq. ft. of office space. The 5.7 acre site contains sufficient space to accommodate a future addition to the building if and when such an expansion is warranted. On site parking ' has been arranged to provide sufficient spaces which exceed the on site parking standards of the city. Opus and Affiliates in Minneapolis•Chicago•Phoenix•Milwaukee•Tampa•Pensacola I • • 11 Mr. Paul Krause February 16, 1990 Page 2 1 In our opinion, the site and building plans comply with the development standards and criteria of the IOP-Industrial Office Park District underlying the site, and therefore, should cause few problems in terms of city approval. We would appreciate having the enclosed application, plat and related site plan drawings processed and scheduled for the March 21 meeting of the Planing Commission and April 9 meeting of the City Council for consideration. Our interest is to begin grading work on the site by mid-April. Occupancy I of the new building is being targeted for the first part of October. Therefore, your cooperation in helping us meet the desired schedule for Planning Commission and City Council approval will be most appreciated. 1 Call me at 936-4419 if you have questions or have need of any additional information. Thank you. Sincerely, 444114.144154"*"..°8*************■ Robert A. Worthington, AICP Executive Director , Governmmental Affairs RAW/kk ; I Enclosures 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CITY '0 FF r . s _ ,„ . CHANHASSEN 1 . % . . .„ . . . . .:. . 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 I ' \ (612) 937-1900 * FAX (612) 937-5739 MEMORANDUM IITO: Paul Kruass, Planning Direc IFROM: Gary Warren, City Engineer DATE: March 14 , 1990 II SUBJ: Preliminary Plat Review for Chanhassen Lakes Business Park 6th Addition and Site Plan Review for Roberts Automatic Products IFile No. 90-7 Land Use Review Upon review of the preliminary plat for Chanhassen Lakes Business I Park 6th Addition dated December=1, 1989, prepared by Sunde Land Surveying, Inc. , and site plans=for Roberts Automatic Products dated February 19 , 1990 , prepareeby Opus Corporation, I offer the following comments and recommendations: II ce, _, `'sr`i Preliminary Plat iII The plat overall appears acceptable w th the addition of a drainage and utility easement over the westerly. 25 feet of Lot 1, Block 1 and a driveway easement to be given for the church access over Lot 3. II Site Plan - Sheet P'A1 I Iii The plans propose two driveway access points onto Lake Drive. I Both accesses are proposed 24 feet wide.` Due to anticipated truck traffic,-the westerly access should-m>be widened to 36 feet to accommodate' truck turning-movements•- and paved with a concrete Iapron. -- . ..• , - .� .. .....--.r..- ... 1 The plans propose parking lot to be constructer `= hin 10 feet of the westerly property ine,�:_ This will,,xeperaach upon the I City's 25-foot wide drainage"and i'ty'-easement. This drainage and utility easement was recentlyuired in conjunction with the Lake Drive project for extension of a 36-inch storm sewer II northerly along the common lot4.1ne. Due to the depth of the sewer line, it is necessary to maintain a 25-foot wide easement. We feel that the parking lot and landscaping can encroach upon II the easement area conditioned upon the applicant entering into a hold harmless agreement with the City to acknowledge the City will not be responsible for any damage or restoration costs to the parking lot or landscaping while performing maintenance to Ithe storm sewer line. II ( II Paul Krauss • Marcn 14, 1990 Page 2 The plans fail to indicate concrete curb and gutter around the ' parking lots or driveways . All paved areas should include concrete curb and gutter (B-612 or better) . Grading, Utility and Erosion Control - Sheet PC1 The plans propose conveying storm drainage through a series of storm sewer pipes which eventually tie into the City' s storm sewer in Lake Drive and along the westerly side of the property. Additional catch basins shall be added on the driveway entrances to intercept storm runoff prior to it draining out onto Lake Drive and at the entrance to the truck loading lot which should drain to the westerly storm sewer. The overall storm sewer system has been designed for a 5-year storm frequency. City codes require storm sewers to be designed for a. 10 year storm frequency. In conjunction with the Lake Drive project, a large retention pond was constructed to accommodate storm runoff from Lake Drive and the adjacent properties. Therefore, on-site retention of storm water will not be required. The majority of the site is proposed to be graded except for the northeast corner which contains the majority of the trees. Fairly steep slopes will be created from the site grading along the northerly portion of the site similar to Empak's site , directly to the west. In these areas, erosion control blankets are to be used to stabilize the slopes and minimize erosion. A row of Type III erosion control shall be added along the northeast and east side of the parking lot and CB-2 shall be pro- tected with silt fence and straw bales. After sodding, the ero- sion control shall be relocated to the sod/seed line. The plans propose Type II erosion control fence along the southerly and westerly perimeters of the lot. The plans indicate the erosion control will be installed prior to commencement of any site grading. Type III erosion control shall be used along the Lake Drive frontage instead of Type II. Where grading is proposed within the gas and power line ease- , ments, appropriate permits shall be obtained from the respective utilities prior to grading and complied with. Sanitary Sewer and Water Municipal water and sanitary sewer service is available from Lake Drive via existing stubs. No utility cuts shall be made to Lake Drive without the approval of the City Engineer. Recommendations 1 1. The applicant shall obtain and comply with all conditions of the Watershed District permit. Paul Krauss March 2, 1990 Page 3 2. A 25-foot utility and drainage easement shall be dedicated on the plat over the existing storm sewer along the westerly lot ' line of Lot 1 , Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park 6th Addition. ' 3. A driveway easement shall be provided across Lot 3 for the church access . 4. The westerly driveway access shall be widened to 36 feet and ' the apron area shall be concrete instead of bituminous. 5. The applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City to 11 allow construction of the parking lot and landscaping within the City 's 25-foot drainage and utility easement on the west side of the property and releasing the City from any restora- tion obligation for the parking lot and landscaping in the ' event sewer repairs are necessary. 6. The applicant shall add additional catch basins to intercept ' storm runoff before draining out onto Lake Drive and at the entrance to the truck loading dock area. 7. The storm sewer system shall be redesigned for a 10-year storm frequency and revised drainage calculations provided to the City. 8. 8-612 concrete curb and gutter shall be constructed around ' all parking lots and driveways. 9. Appropriate gas and power company permits shall be obtained prior to grading within the utility easements along the north ' and east corner of the site. 10 . Type III erosion control shall be used along Lake Drive and added to the northeast and east corner of the front parking lot. Straw bales and silt fence shall be deployed to protect CB-2 from silt and sediment. Wood-fiber blankets shall be installed along the disturbed side slopes in the northeast corner of the site. After sodding, the erosion control shall be relocated to the sod/seed line. The southwest corner of ' the site should be sodded to the north edge of the parking lot. 11. No utility cuts shall be allowed to Lake Drive without the approval of the City Engineer. 12 . Revised plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer addressing these conditions of approval before a building ' permit will be issued. ktm c: Dave Hempel , Sr. Engineering Technician r , I a -r) ' , C I T Y 0 F I . 4 . „.... ., .: . : , . . , . ... ,. .. . .. • . .:. 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 • ' ■ (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 I I MEMORANDUM TO: Jo Ann. 0.1-6en, Sen.i.o4 PI..rutnex I FROM: Man.& Litt.4.in., F.L.A.e. Mcm-ohme. INV DATE: Feblutm41 23 , 1990 I SU13J: S4..te PLan. Rev4..ew #90-3 - - II :--- %- Comment4 and/on 4ecommemdat2on4: 1 . Have the devetope414 eng.Lmee4.4 pkotade F4.4e Ma44hat w4..th wate4 4tow dmtm 4.n 4e4e4eneCto theitwo (2 ) on 44.te 44.4e hyd4ant4; 4...e. , the 2 hyd4mnt4 on de4d end mm4n4 Ve44114 2 hydAant4 on a. 6" Looped 444t4m. IL A4' 2 . P4otade 4a.d.i.m4iamt41404 pm,a4ng tot 4.4tand4 to attow d44..ve II thicomgh 4o4 N.A.e. Depwament veh.4.4A44. t ,e- ,-. • ki ° : --,--)mc-r2 --2Awl--zE,---1,---...,- --- I 7.,- --: I '''3'.'.:::?;, -..?i+ala ''''•-''. I 1 I I I TY O F 'RC DATE: 3-13-90 _ ' CIIAUAE C.C. DATE: \ CASE NO: Prepared by: Sietsema:k STAFF REPORT -P<_r� � 1 PROPOSAL: 40,000 sq. ft. office/warehouse/manufacturing facility to be constructed on 10 acres of property la VLOCATION: On Lake Drive, east of County Road 17, north of ' J Lake Susan Park IQ APPLICANT: Roberts Automatic Products , Inc. 4451 West 76th Street Minneapolis, MN 55435 PRESENT ZONING: IOP, Industrial Office Park District ' ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: N- IOP, Industrial Office Park District S- IOP, Industrial Office Park District E- IOP, Industrial Office Park District I < W- IOP, Industrial Office Park District IO COMP. TRAIL PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan does not identify the need for additional park land due to W the close location of Lake Susan Park, j which serves the entire industrial park. MIND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The trail plan calls for a 6 ft. wide sidewalk along the south side of Lake ' Drive. i I , II Roberts Automatic Products March 13 , 1990 II Page 2 It is the recommendation of this office to P accept park dedication fees in lieu of parkland. As the sidewalk is included in the Lake Drive road construction, it is recommended that trail fees I be accepted in lieu of trail construction. Park and Recreation Commission Action (March 13, 1990 ) ( I ..i The Park and Recreation Commission unanimously acted to recommend II approval with the condition the park and trail dedication fees be paid in lieu of park land dedication and trail construction. II II II I II II II I II 1 1 II I II , Planning Commission Meeting March 21, 1990 - Page 41 1 Emmi.ngs: Like the good old days with all those little subdivisions. All those big subdivisions. Erhart: Well contact Ladd and basically indicate that we would prefer the earlier meeting . Ellson: If he can get there fine. If he can' t, we have lots . Maybe he ' could send us his comments. . . Erhart: Okay. Let' s move along then. (Joan Ahrens left the meeting at this point. ) ' PUBLIC HEARING: ROBERTS AUTOMATIC PRODUCTS , INC. , 5. 725 ACRES OF PROPERTY ZONED IOP, INDUSTRIAL OFFICE PARK AND LOCATED OFF OF LAKE DRIVE JUST EAST OF CR 17: A. PRELIMINARY PLAT TO REPLAT LOT 3, BLOCK 2, CHANHASSEN LAKES BUSINESS PARK 2ND ADDITION INTO TWO LOTS AND ONE OUTLOT. B. SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 48 ,200 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE/ MANUFACTURING FACILITY. ' Public Present : Name Address David Hunt Opus Corporation Jay Johnson ' Sharmin Al-Jaff and Paul Krauss presented the staff report. Vice Chairman Erhart called the public hearing to order. David Hunt : Mr . Chairman, my name is David Hunt . I'm the project manager with Opus Corporation. We concur with the staff report as was presented. We'd like to make some clarifications. First one was as Paul has ' indicated. The elevations that were shown by our architect do not indicate clearly that the entire building will be of a texture pre-cast. Either a racked finish or of a random red. It will all be painted so hopefully that will satisfy the concerns there. Secondly we would like to go on record on three items that were mentioned in the staff report. First of all , Robert' s Automatic Products will require some sort of a trash enclosure in the vicinity of the dock area. We do plan on screening that in accordance with the City ordinances . We will work that out with the staff. The landscape easement that's indicated with the church property. We propose that to be a temporary type easement . We are putting the trees there primarily for the benefit of the church to remedy some of their concerns with the views of the building. We will obtain a landscape easement to place the trees there. We' ll maintain the trees for the warranty period as well as the period required for the landscape bond, whatever at which time we would propose that the church take over the responsibility for Planning Commission Meeting II March 21, 1990 - Page 42 maintaining those plants as it is on their property and I believe the church has, in talking with Mr. Robert' s, agreed to do this. The third thing mentioned in the staff report concerning the 30 inch oak tree that ' s on the site. We do not plan on disturbing that tree at this time. We are providing sufficient landscape material such that if the tree was removed I at this time, we would be providing the sufficient caliper inches on the project . What we would propose is that we would be credited with that landscaping so in the future when the tree is removed, no additional requirements be placed on us. The tree will stay in place until expansion is anticipated 8 to 10 years down the road and then if the tree is still living there , it would be removed. Those are all the clarifications we have. 1 Erhart: Okay, thanks Mr . Hunt . Is there any other input from the public? Questions? Jay Johnson : Jay Johnson, semi-public. I 'd like to know about hazardous waste at this site. It 's a question that sometimes gets asked but it's no in our ordinance that I just looked through but will a hazardous waste permit be required? Will hazardous waste be stored and what type of toxic or combustible , whatever materials are going to be used on the site? If you can put that information together, I 'd like to see it in the future . I 'm on the City Council . David Hunt: Okay, that' s no problem. . . Jay Johnson : I always ask that question later so if I tell you now, you' ll be ready for it. Erhart : Did you get your question answered? Ellson: He's just saying be prepared because it will come up again. I Jay Johnson : Yeah , if I tell them now then in 2 weeks or whenever if I ask the question they' re already ready for it. Erhart : Anything else? Is there a motion to close the public hearing? Emmings moved, Wildermuth seconded to close the public hearing. All voted II in favor and the motion carried. The public hearing was closed . Erhart: Who wants to start? , Wildermuth: I ' ll start. Is that provision that was discussed by Mr . Hunt acceptable to the City regarding the oak tree? by I Krauss: Commissioner Wildermuth, we don' t have a mechanism in place to forward credit the loss of a tree. I Wildermuth: Right. Isn' t that a point that has to be addressed at the time? I J Planning Commission Meeting March 21, 1990 - Page 43 I Krauss : Yeah . What would happen when the addition came in, we would ' invariably require landscaping be placed around that. In any case I would more than likely exceed the 30 inches anyway and that would just be to satisfy normal screening requirement. Ijdon't see it as a major issue. ' Wildermuth : I 'd like to ask the applicant , are they planning on any underground storage tanks for oil? How about above ground tanks for cutting oil? Screw machine operations generally use cutting oil . RAP Representative: Anything that we'd have would be inside. Wildermuth: How about spent cutting oil disposal? Do you use a chip ' ringer? RAP Representative: Do we use a chip ringer , yes and we recover most of ' the. . . Wildermuth : So you won' t have any disposal problems to speak of other than chips? Did Opus build the Empak building? Erhart: Anything else Jim? ' Wildermuth: I really don' t have any reservations about these requirements and apparently you don't either . You didn't seem to take issue with them. I 'm a little bit concerned about what the building is going to look like but I guess if the occupant is satisfied. David Hunt : . . .elevation showing what we' re thinking of. ' Wildermuth: Good. So the building ' s going to be located in a pretty classy neighborhood as far as industrial buildings go. David Hunt: It will be gray colored painted pre-cast with some red trim. The windows and along the top. There will be additional , this wall will not look like it' s shown here. There will be an entrance door as well as ' several additional windows that we added along that elevation. I would call it a moderate. . . Wildermuth: How large will the windows be? ' David Hunt: These punch windows will be approximately 8 feet wide, 4 to 8 feet wide I believe by 4 to 6 feet high. Wildermuth: And then the upper sketch. ' David Hunt : This is two different renderings. Color renditions of what could happen. . . Wildermuth: That is the front entrance. David Hunt: This is the front entrance. This is the building steps back by here by the office portion. This is the main office. This same ' treatment will carry around onto the east elevation on there as well as the Planning Commission Meeting March 21, 1990 - Page 44 west elevation on this side and across the. . . Emmings: Would the stuff on the rooftop be visible from this hill? Wildermuth: It will probably be visible to the church but you have that ' shrouded. David Hunt: We' re adding additional shrubery. As far as from the street, the building sits up high enough that anything that is visible, it's definitely going to be cut off. I mean you would see the. . . top 1 or 2 fee of the screening . . . Emmings: Yeah, and that ' s screened with the same material . 1 David Hunt: The pre-cast would probably be not appropriate. We' re thinking of something that drives material and would appear from a distance' to be a concrete type product. Given the appearance of a flat concrete. . . Emmings: I thought our report said it would be the same material . David Hunt: Similar . Krauss : It' s similar . Emmings: Is that alright with you or should we have a condition in here that it should be approved? ' Krauss : Well no. We supported the use of that sort of compatible type of material. We think it's an improvement over the fencing. r ' Emmings: Okay, you' re satisfied . Okay. Wildermuth: That 's all I have. ' Erhart: Steve? Emmings: It looks fine to me. Elison: I like it. I like it when people tell you, even though we' re not approving it, where the possible future expansion' s going to be so we get all feel for the site as a whole and I appreciate that in a plan. This is just for my own interest because I like to know what's coming into Chanhassen but you're right next door to Empak who runs all week long 3 shifts. What I kind of work hours do you have? RAP Representative: The plant basically runs two 10 hour shifts 4 days a week. Fridays are overtime and the office runs five 8 hour days. Elison: No, I think it looks good . Welcome. Erhart: Okay. Isn't there some staff comment about landscaping on the north side of the building? I II . Planning Commission Meeting March 21, 1990 - Page 45 I Krauss : What we made reference to is that we would have liked to be able ' to have the flexibility to do some landscaping up there. However, there' s utility easements that preclude that and as we looked at the site more in depth, we looked at the site from difference vantage points. It's not ' right next to TH 5. The area with the easements is that basically blank area north of the building. Sharmin if you have an overall map of the area, it ' s displaced by the railroad tracks and that embankment helps to screen it further. What we really want to get away from is, I hope they ' take no offense but the buildings where as you pass by on TH 5 all you see is a sea of rooftop equipment. I don' t think that' s going to be the case here and as you can see , what' s happening is this traffic as it comes up ' and over TH 5 is tailing away from the site. You've got the railway embankment and this is quite a bit lower . I can' t tell you that you won' t see it all but it' s going to be pretty obscure. ' Erhart : But the ordinance requires that they have to plant a tree every 40 feet on that property line doesn' t it? ' Krauss : But it doesn' t say where you have to plant it . What we do is we take those trees and we distribute it to the areas that we feel are the most appropriate . ' Erhart : That ' s what you did here? Krauss: Yeah. They meet that requirement. Erhart : By distributing the trees they would have had up there? Krauss: Yes. We would never recommend that we arbitrarily put a tree every 40 feet . That ' s just one mechanism in getting enough trees to do the job correctly. Erhart : I never thought of the ordinance that way. Not that I disagree with the concept. Anyway, and the applicant is acceptable to the idea of requiring , did you say 10 foot spruce? ' David Hunt: . . .some of the 6 to 8 foot. . .rather than adding additional trees? Krauss : Well there were some additional trees requested as well . We didn' t come up with a number . What we' re looking for is these trees to be ' increased and that these trees be increased in height and several more of them placed back in here. RAP Representative: . . .the top of that berm. . . Krauss : Well to the extent there is something here but it's quite nominal . ' RAP Representative: 2 to 3 feet. Krauss : There' s like 6 loading docks? IRAP Representative: There will be 3 loading docks with drive in doors. I Planning Commission Meeting March 21, 1990 - Page 46 Erhart : Well I just wanted to point out when you start getting into the 1 foot spruce trees, the price over a 6 foot tree is more than twice and it' great. I just want to make sure that we try to treat everybody the same i going forward. Obviously 10 is better than 6 and I think we have to have a feel for consistency. I Krauss : We would be willing to look at a plan that mixes the sizes if it accomplishes the goal . Fundamentally we don't think anybody should have t look at truck loading dock from a public right-of-way and there are a lot of situations in town where you do just that. There are more activist way of screening that. You can bring the building wall out beyond to screen it. That' s a relatively expensive proposition. I happen to think trees II look better but they needed some improvement for that screen to be effective. Erhart : You feel that is our policy to try to screen all loading docks from the public right-of-way? Krauss : Yeah. No question. , Erhart : And you feel the 10 foot tree here is needed to do that? David Hunt: . . .as you look at the elevations there, we are probably in the' neighborhood of 15 to 20 feet lower on the public right-of-way than you are on that loading dock so if you' re looking up from public right-of-way, a 6 foot tree , 6 to 8 foot as we' re proposing , it' s going to. . . I could agree with the staff on that west side. . . Emmings: It may be a benefit to the City in having quantity and getting a 6 to 8 foot tree because presumably it won't stay that tall . Krauss : Of course the trailer you' re putting behind is quite a bit taller II than the tree. You know we' re not opposed to working this out. . .driving down Lake Drive. When you' re right here, Lake Drive is dropping down. You do have that issue, well that view when you' re looking uphill and a 6 foot tree may just do the trick there and if we could get a site perspective that showed that. Wildermuth: Is it just . . .and those trucks aren' t going to be there that II long anyway are they? Erhart: Another thing here. What ordinance do we have that prevents somebody from cutting down an oak tree? Krauss: We do have regulations that say when you cut down a tree you have to replace the caliper inches. • Erhart: For a subdivider or individual lot owner? Krauss: That's a site plan ordinance. ' Wildermuth: I think it' s for a developer. 1 Planning Commission Meeting Match 21, 1990 - Page 47 Erhart : It ' s a developer not a lot owner and I guess I 'd be opposed to any ' tree ordinance that affected a lot owner . Emmings: Me too . Erhart : I mean you can' t tell people they can' t cut trees down. ' Krauss: Oh, you mean you as an individual homeowner? Erhart : Yeah . ' Krauss : Well , actually that' s one of the things on our work list is tree ordinance. ' Erhart : You haven' t got our comments yet either . But from a developer I think we agree. Just to ask Brian's question here. You' re confident that the additional runoff and the contaminants from the roof and so forth are, ' we're adequately protecting the water that flows into the Lake Susan there as well as we have on the roof on Empak? Essentially the same standards are being applied? ' Krauss : There' s an overall drainage system that intercepts all that water . There' s a large wetland that' s in front of the Rosemount facility that would serve to filter the water before it' s discharged into the lake. That' s one of the few areas in town that we actually have a comprehensive storm water plan for . ' Erhart : Okay, I really have no other issues . I think it' s a reasonable plan for the site. And again, also welcome this company. If there' s no other discussion , does someone want to attempt to make a motion here? Wildermuth: I ' ll move that we recommend to approve Site Plan #90-3 and Preliminary and Final Plat #90-2 as shown on the plat dated March 5, 1990 subject to the following conditions 1 thru 11. ' Ellson : I ' ll second . Erhart : Okay. Now the agenda here states that there' s, essentially does this one motion cover both the Preliminary Plat and the Site Plan? Emmings: Which is kind of unusual . Krauss : Yeah , you should have both. We gave you one recommendation but yeah, it would be adviseable to have two separate motions. ' Erhart: Would you prefer that? Krauss : Then we'd have to disegregate the conditions I suppose. ' Emmings: We never combine two like this before but I don't know that you can' t. The trouble is there are conditions in here that relate just to the plat and conditions that relate just to the site plan. Planning Commission Meeting I March 21, 1990 - Page 48 Krauss : Right . Can we have a compromise . If you could approve it this II way, we' ll disegregate it before it gets to the Council? Erhart: If the attorney here is okay with that, it' s fine with me. ' Wildermuth moved, Ellson seconded that the Planning Commission recommend t approve Site Plan #90-3 and Preliminary and Final Flat #90-2 as shown on the plat dated March 5, 1990 subject to the following conditions: 1. Revise architectural plans so that exterior walls have textured I surfaces or exposed aggregate patterns. Provide information showing location of trash storage on the site. Provide final details on rooftop screening for approval by staff. 2. The applicant provide a detailed signage plan and apply for city permits. Post stop signs on the driveway access to Lake Drive. Provide details on site lighting for approval by city staff . 3. Revise the landscape plans as recommended in the report to improve screening of the truck loading area . Provide staff with a detailed cost estimate of landscaping to be used in calculating the required financial guarantees . These guarantees must be posted prior to building permit issuance. 4. Revise the plat to designate Lot 3 as an outlot and provide an access easement over the church driveway. An additional 25 foot wide drainage and utility easement over the west side of Lot 1, Block 1 is required. The Roberts Automatic site shall pay the required park dedication fee at the time building permits are requested . 5. The applicant shall obtain and comply with all conditions of the Watershed District permit. 6. The westerly driveway access shall be widened to 36 feet and the apron II area shall be concrete instead of bituminous. Revise internal circulation as required to facilitate access by city fire equipment , for approval by the City Fire Marshal . , 7. The applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City to allow construction of the parking lot and landscaping within the City' s 25 foot drainage and utility easement on the west side of the property and, releasing the city from any restoration obligation for the parking lot and landscaping in the event sewer repairs are necessary. 8. The applicant shall add additional catch basins to intercept storm runoff before draining out onto Lake Drive and at the entrance to the truck loading dock area. The storm sewer system shall be redesigned II for a 10 year storm frequency and revised drainage calculations provided to the City. B-612 concrete curb and gutter shall be constructed around all parking lots and driveways. I/ I Planning Com�m�ission Meeting March 21, 1990 - Page 49 r 9. Appropriate gas and power company permits shall be obtained prior to grading within the utility easements along the north and east corner of ' the site . 10. Type III erosion control shall be used along Lake Drive and added to ' the northeast and east corner of the front parking lot. Straw bales and silt fence shall be deployed to protect CB-2 from silt and sediment. Wood fiber blankets shall be installed along the disturbed ' side slopes in the northeast corner of the site. After sodding , the erosion control shall be relocated to the sod/seed line. The southwest corner of the site should be sodded to the north edge of the parking lot. 11. No utility cuts shall be allowed to Lake Drive without the approval of the City Engineer . ' All voted in favor and the motion carried . ' APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Emmings moved, Erhart seconded to approve the Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated February 21, 1990 as presented . All voted in favor except Wildermuth who abstained and the motion carried . CITY COUNCIL UPDATE: ' Krauss : I 'm sorry, I realized I broke my streak and forgot to give you one. I 'm trying to remember what we did. I remember we were there quite late. ' Emmings: Well you broke your own streak. It ' s fairly typical over time here. ' Krauss : Hopefully it won' t be now. Emmings: What happened? ' Krauss : We had the private driveway ordinance on again I think for the third time for final reading and it was continued again. Councilman Boyt continues to have concerns about the possibility that the private driveway ' mechanism would be used to avoid building a public street where public street is in fact required. My own personal feeling is that the ordinance is specifically designed to say that if there's a public street that we think is required , you can' t use it, the ordinance for it and we've hopefully clarified some of the language. We've also added some language that requires that the street be plowed and maintained so that emergency ' vehicles are passable at all times or else the city can do the work and assess the cost back to the property owner . That' s rescheduled again for Monday night and hopefully that will go through. The R-16 district ordinance passed so that is now on the books . Emmings: Is the beachlot one done? Did that get a second reading? I