CC Packet 2010 02 08A G E NDA
C H AN H A SS E N C I T Y C O UNC I L
M O NDAY , F E B RUARY 8 , 2010
C H AN H A SS E N M UN I C I P A L B U I L D I N G , 7700 M AR K ET B O U LE VARD
5 :30 P .M . – E C O N O M I C D E V EL O P M E N T AU T HO R I T Y M EET I N G
E D A -1 . A pp r o v a l o f M i n u t e s d a t e d N o v e m b e r 23 , 2009 .
E D A -2 . R ec o mm e n d t h a t t h e C i t y C o u n c il C a ll f o r P u b li c H ea r i n g o n a P r o p o s e d
M o d i f i ca t i o n t o t h e R e d e v e l o p m e n t P l a n f o r t h e C h a nh a ss e n R e d e v e l o p m e n t
P r o j ec t A r ea a n d t h e P r o p o s e d E s t a b li s h m e n t o f T a x I n c r e m e n t D i s t r i c t #10.
5 :45 P .M . - C I T Y C O UNC I L W O R K S E SS I O N , F O UN T A I N C O N F E R E NC E R OO M
N o t e : I f t h e C it y C o un c il do e s n o t c o m p l e t e t h e w o r k s e ss i o n it e m s i n t h e ti m e a ll o tt e d , t h e
r e m a i n i n g it e m s w ill b e c o n s i d e r e d a f t e r t h e r e g u l a r ag e n da.
A . D i s c u ss 2010 K e y F i n a n c i a l S t r a t e g i e s .
B . D i s c u ss R o a d A ss e ss m e n t P r ac t i ce s a n d t h e E ff ec t s o f D e f e rr i n g R o a d C o n s t r u c t i o n
P r o j ec t s.
7 :00 P .M . – R E G U L AR M EET I N G , C I T Y C O UNC I L C H A M B E R S
CA LL T O O RD E R (P l e d g e o f A ll e g i a n ce)
P U B L I C ANN O UNC E M E N TS
C O N S E N T A G E NDA
A ll i t e m s li s t e d u n d e r t h e C o n s e n t A g e n d a a r e c o n s i d e r e d t o b e r o u t i n e b y t h e c i t y c o u n c il a n d w ill
b e c o n s i d e r e d a s o n e m o t i o n . T h e r e w ill b e n o s e p a r a t e d i s c u ss i o n o f t h e s e i t e m s . I f d i s c u ss i o n i s
d e s i r e d , t h a t i t e m w ill b e r e m o v e d f r o m t h e C o n s e n t A g e n d a a n d c o n s i d e r e d s e p a r a t e l y . C i t y
c o u n c il ac t i o n i s b a s e d o n t h e s t a ff r ec o mm e n d a t i o n f o r eac h i t e m . R e f e r t o t h e c o u n c il p ac k e t f o r
eac h s t a ff r e p o r t .
1 . a . A pp r o v a l o f M i n u t e s :
- C i t y C o u n c il W o r k S e ss i o n M i n u t e s d a t e d J a n u a r y 25 , 2010
- C i t y C o u n c il S u mm a r y M i n u t e s d a t e d J a n u a r y 25 , 2010
- C i t y C o u n c il V e r b a t im M i n u t e s d a t e d J a n u a r y 25 , 2010
R ece i v e C o mmi ss i o n M i n u t e s :
- P l a nn i n g C o mmi ss i o n S u mm a r y M i n u t e s d a t e d J a n u a r y 19 , 2009
- P l a nn i n g C o mmi ss i o n V e r b a t im M i n u t e s d a t e d J a n u a r y 19 , 2009
1
b . H ill S t r ee t D r a i n a g e P r o j ec t : A w a r d C o n s t r u c t i o n C o n t r ac t .
c . A pp r o v a l o f T e m p o r a r y O n -S a l e L i qu o r L i ce n s e , G y m J a m E v e n t , A p r il 10 , S t .
H u b e r t C a t h o li c C o mm u n i t y , 8201 M a i n S t r ee t .
d . A pp r o v a l o f A m e n d m e n t t o C h a p t e r 20 o f C i t y C o d e A m e n d i n g t h e C h a nh a ss e n
R e t a il C e n t e r , M a r k e t S qu a r e , a n d W e s t O n e P l a nn e d U n i t D e v e l o p m e n t s .
e . I TE M D ELETED (A pp r o v a l o f t h e R E A C H f o r R e s o u r ce s A d a p t i v e R ec r ea t i o n
C o n t r ac t f o r 2010 ).
f . C a ll f o r P u b li c H ea r i n g o n a P r o p o s e d M o d i f i ca t i o n t o t h e R e d e v e l o p m e n t P l a n f o r
t h e C h a nh a ss e n R e d e v e l o p m e n t P r o j ec t A r ea a n d t h e P r o p o s e d E s t a b li s h m e n t o f
T a x I n c r e m e n t D i s t r i c t #10 .
g . I TE M D ELETE D (G l ea s o n V a r i a n ce , 2111 P i n e h u r s t D r i v e [L o t 22 , B l o c k 1 ,
P i n e h u r s t 2 nd A dd i t i o n ]: D e n i a l o f R e qu e s t f o r a n A f t e r-t h e -F ac t H a r d S u r f ace
C o v e r a g e V a r i a n ce ; A pp li ca n t : U S H o m e C o r p o r a t i o n .)
h . 2010 P o n d C l ea n o u t , S W M P 18 D : A w a r d C o n t r ac t
V I S I T O R P R E S E N T A T I O NS
P U B L I C H E AR I N GS
3 . C o n s i d e r E a s e m e n t V aca t i o n , L o t s 4 & 5 , B l o c k 1 , B r e n d e n P o n d 3 r d A dd i t i o n .
4 . A udu b o n R o a d R ec o n s t r u c t i o n P r o j ec t 10 -02 : P u b li c H ea r i n g ; A u t h o r i ze P r e p a r a t i o n o f
P l a n s & S p ec i f i ca t i o n s .
UN F I N I S H E D B U S I N E SS - N o ne
N E W B U S I N E SS
5 . A pp r o v a l o f A m e n d m e n t t o C h a p t e r 20 o f C i t y C o d e ; R ez o n i n g C e r t a i n D o w n t o w n
P r o p e r t i e s .
C O UNC I L P R E S E N T A T I O NS
AD M I N I S T RA T I V E P R E S E N T A T I O NS
C O RR E S P O ND E NC E P AC K ET
AD J O URN M E NT
2
A c o p y o f t h e s t a ff r e p o r t a n d s upp o r t i n g d o c u m e n t a t i o n b e i n g s e n t t o t h e c i t y c o u n c il w ill b e
a v a il a b l e a f t e r 2 :00 p .m . o n T h u r s d a y . P l ea s e c o n t ac t c i t y h a ll a t 952 -227 -1100 t o v e r i f y t h a t
y o u r i t e m h a s n o t b ee n d e l e t e d f r o m t h e a g e n d a a n y t im e a f t e r 2 :00 p .m . o n T h u r s d a y .
GUID E L IN E S F O R V ISI T O R P R E S E N T A T IONS
We l c o m e t o t h e C h a nh a ss e n C it y C o u n c il M ee ti n g . I n t h e i n t e r e s t of o p e n c o mm u n i c ati o n s , t h e C h a nh a ss e n C it y
C o u n c il w i s h e s t o p r ov i d e a n o pp o r t u n it y fo r t h e pu b li c t o a dd r e ss t h e C it y C o u n c il . T h at o pp o r t u n it y i s p r ov i d e d
at e v e r y r e gu la r C it y C o u n c il m ee ti n g du r i n g V i s it o r P r e s e n t a ti o ns .
1. A n y o n e i n d i c ati n g a d e s i r e t o s p e a k du r i n g V i s it o r P r e s e n tati o n s w ill b e a c k n o w l e dg e d b y t h e M a y o r .
W h e n c all e d up o n t o s p e a k , s tat e y o u r n am e , a dd r e ss , a n d t o p i c . A ll r e ma r k s s h all b e a dd r e ss e d t o t h e
C it y C o u n c il a s a w h o l e , n o t t o a n y s p ec i f i c m e m b e r (s ) o r t o a n y p e r s o n w h o i s n o t a m e m b e r of t h e C it y
C o u n c il .
2. I f t h e r e a r e a n u m b e r of i n d i v i du al s p r e s e n t t o s p e a k o n t h e s am e t o p i c , p l e a s e d e s i g n at e a s p o k e s p e r s o n
t h at c a n s u mma r iz e t h e i ss u e .
3. L imit y o u r c o mm e n t s t o f i v e mi n u t e s . A dd iti o n al tim e ma y b e g r a n t e d at t h e d i s c r e ti o n of t h e M a y o r . I f
y o u h a v e w r itt e n c o mm e n t s , p r ov i d e a c o p y t o t h e C o u n c il .
4. D u r i n g V i s it o r P r e s e n tati o n s , t h e C o u n c il a n d s ta ff li s t e n t o c o mm e n t s a n d w ill n o t e n g a g e i n d i s c u ss i o n .
C o u n c il m e m b e r s o r t h e C it y M a n a g e r ma y a s k qu e s ti o n s of y o u i n o r d e r t o g ai n a t h o r o ug h
u n d e r s ta n d i n g of y o u r c o n ce rn , s ugg e s ti o n o r r e qu e s t .
5. P l e a s e b e a w a r e t h at d i s r e s p ec t f u l c o mm e n t s o r c o mm e n t s of a p e r s o n al n at u r e , d i r ec t e d at a n i n d i v i du al
e it h e r b y n am e o r i n f e r e n ce , w ill n o t b e all o w e d . P e r s o nn e l c o n ce rn s s h o u l d b e d i r ec t e d t o t h e C it y
M a n a g e r .
M em b e r s o f t h e C it y C o u n c il a nd s o me s t a ff mem b e r s m a y g a t h e r a t H o u li h a n ’s R e s t a u r a n t & B a r , 530 P ond P r o me n a d e i n C h a nh a ss e n i mme d i a t e l y
a f t e r t h e mee ti ng f o r a p u r e l y s o c i a l e v e n t. A ll mem b e r s o f t h e p u b li c a r e w e l c o me .
3
CHANHASSEN ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
SPECIAL MEETING
NOVEMBER 23 2009
Chairman Furlong called the meeting to order at 5 30 p m
MEMBERS PRESENT Tom Furlong Vicki Ernst Bethany Tjornhom and Jerry McDonald
MEMBERS ABSENT Bryan Litsey
STAFF PRESENT Todd Gerhardt Laurie Hokkanen Kate Aanenson Paul Oehme Todd
Hoffman and Greg Sticha
CHANHASSEN TRANSIT STATION 500 MARKET STREET APPROVE QUIT CLAIM DEED TRANSFERRING PROPERTY FROM THE EDA TO THE CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
Laurie Hokkanen presented the staff report on this item Todd Gerhardt provided historical
background on how this parcel became under EDA ownership
Resolution 2009 01 Ernst moved McDonald seconded to adopt the resolution approving
the sale of the property from the EDA to the City of Chanhassen All voted in favor and
the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0
APPROVAL OF MINUTES Tjornhom moved Ernst seconded to approve the minutes of
the Economic Development Authority meeting dated February 23 2009 as presented All
voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0
Tjornhom moved Ernst seconded to adjourn the meeting All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0 The Economic Development Authority
meeting was adjourned at 5 33 p m
Submitted by Todd Gerhardt
Executive Director
Prepared by Nann Opheim
4
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard
PO Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
Administration
Phone 952 227 1100
Fax 952 227 1110
Building Inspections
Phone 952 227 1180
Fax 952 227 1190
Engineering
Phone 952 227 1160
Fax 952 227 1170
Finance
Phone 952 227 1140
Fax 952 227 1110
Park Recreation
Phone 952 227 1120
Fax 952 227 1110
Recreation Center
2310 Coulter Boulevard
Phone 952 227 1400
Fax 952 227 1404
Planning
Natural Resources
Phone 952 227 1130
Fax 952 227 1110
Public Works
1591 Park Road
Phone 952 227 1300
Fax 952 227 1310
Senior Center
Phone 952 227 1125
Fax 952 227 1110
Web Site
www ci chanhassen mn us
E OA l
TO Todd Gerhardt Executive Director
Laurie Hokkanen Assistant Executive Director l FROM
DATE February 1 2010
SUBJ Request the City Council call for a Public Hearing on the proposed
Modification for the Downtown Redevelopment Project Area and
the proposed establishment of Tax Increment Financing District
10
PROPOSED MOTION
The Economic Development Authority requests that the City Council call for a
Public Hearing on the proposed Modification for the Downtown Redevelopment
Project Area and the proposed establishment of Tax Increment Financing District
10
BACKGROUND
As a part of the development of Chanhassen Station the City signed a
redevelopment agreement with Bloomberg Companies At that time we agreed to
create a Tax Increment Financing District TIP The purpose of the District is to
allow Bloomberg Companies to offset their Assessments for the road and utility
improvements occurring to facilitate Chanhassen Station and further development
of the property surrounding the Chanhassen Dinner Theatre
The first step in the process of establishing a TIP District is to request that the
City Council call for a Public Hearing
RECCOMENDA TION
Staff recommends that the EDA request the City Council call for a Public Hearing
on the proposed Modification for the Downtown Redevelopment Project Area and
the proposed establishment of Tax Increment Financing District 10
ATTACHMENTS
1 Schedule of Events prepared by Ehlers
Chanhassen is a Community for Life Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow 5
CHANHASSEN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
COUNTIES OF CARVER AND HENNEPIN
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO
RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHANHASSEN CALL FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON A MODIFICATION TO THE
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DOWNTOWN CHANHASSEN
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF TAX
INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO 10 A REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
THEREIN AND THE ADOPTION OF A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN
THEREFOR
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners the Board of the Chanhassen Economic
Development Authority the EDA as follows
WHEREAS the City Council Council of the City of Chanhassen Minnesota City established
the Downtown Chanhassen Redevelopment Project Area pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Minnesota
Statutes Sections 469 174 through 469 1799 inclusive as amended in an effort to encourage the
development and redevelopment of certain designated areas within the City and
WHEREAS the EDA is proposing a Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Downtown
Chanhassen Redevelopment Project Area and the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No
10 therein and the adoption of a Tax Increment Financing Plan therefor all pursuant to and in accordance
with Minnesota Statutes Sections 469 174 through 469 1799 and Sections 469 090 to 469 1082
inclusive as amended
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board as follows
1 The EDA hereby requests that the Council call for a public hearing on April 12 2010 to consider the
proposed adoption of a Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Downtown Chanhassen
Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan Modification and the proposed adoption of the
Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No 10 the TIP Plan a
redevelopment district the Redevelopment Plan Modification and the TIP Plan are referred to
collectively herein as the Plans and cause notice of said public hearing to be given as required by
law
2 The EDA directs the Executive Director to transmit copies of the Plans to the Planning Commission
of the City and requests the Planning Commission s written opinion indicating whether the proposed Plans are in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan of the City prior to the date of the public
hearing
3 The Executive Director of the EDA is hereby directed to submit a copy of the Plans to the Council
for its approval
4 The EDA directs the Executive Director to transmit the Plans to the county and the school district s
in which Tax Increment Financing District No 10 is located no later than March 12 2010
6
5 Staff and consultants are authorized and directed to take all steps necessary to prepare the Plans and
related documents and to undertake other actions necessary to bring the Plan before the Council
Approved by the Board on February 8 2010
Thomas A Furlong Chair
ATTEST
Todd Gerhardt Executive Director
7
SCHEDULE OF EVENTS
CHANHASSEN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
AND THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES MINNESOTA
FOR THE PROPOSED MODIFICATION TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
FOR THE DOWNTOWN CHANHASSEN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
AND THE PROPOSED ESTABLISHMENT OF
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO 10
a redevelopment district
Draft as of Januarv 27 2010
January 26 2010 LHB report on redevelopment qualifications for parcels to be included in Tax
Increment Financing District No 10 provided to Ehlers
February 5 2010 Project information property identification numbers and legal descriptions detailed
project description maps but for statement list of sources and uses of funds and
estimated fiscal impacts of the project public improvements and on fire and police
protection for drafting necessary documentation sent to Ehlers
February 8 2010 EDA requests that the City Council call for a public hearing on the proposed
Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Downtown Chanhassen
Redevelopment Project Area and the proposed establishment of Tax Increment
Financing District No 10
February 8 2010 City Council calls for public hearing on the proposed Modification to the
Redevelopment Plan for the Downtown Chanhassen Redevelopment Project Area
and the proposed establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No 10
February 17 2010 Ehlers confirms with the City whether building permits have been issued on the
property to be included in Tax Increment Financing District No 10
February 26 2010 Project information submitted to the County Board for review of county road
impacts if necessary at least 45 days prior to public hearing The County Board
by law has 45 days to review the TIF Plan to determine if any county roads will be
impacted by the development If the City staff believes that the proposed tax
increment financing district will not require unplanned county road improvements
the TIF Plan will not be forwarded to the County Board 45 days prior to the public
hearing Please be aware that the County Board could claim that tax increment
should be used for county roads even after the public hearing If necessary Ehlers
will fax and mail on February 26 2010
March 2 2010 Letter received by Carver County Commissioner gIvmg notice of potential
redevelopment tax increment financing district at least 30 days prior to publication
of public hearing notice Ehlers willfax and mail on or before March 2 2010
EHLERS
LEADERS IN PUBLIC fiNANCE
8
SCHEDULE OF EVENTS PAGE 2
CHANHASSEN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
AND THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES MINNESOTA
FOR THE MODIFICATION TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
FOR THE DOWNTOWN CHANHASSEN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
AND THE PROPOSED ESTABLISHMENT OF
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO 10
a redevelopment district
March 12 2010 Fiscal economic implications received by School Board Clerk and County Auditor
at least 30 days prior to public hearing Ehlers will fax mail on or before
March 12 2010
March 22 2010 Ehlers conducts internal review of Plans
April 1 2010 Date of publication of hearing notice and map at least 10 days but not more than 30
days prior to hearing Chanhassen Villager publication deadline March 25 2010
at 4 00 P M Ehlers will submit notice map and instructions to newspaper on or
before March 25 2010 via email atlegal@swpub com
April 6 2010 Planning Commission reviews the Plans to determine ifthey are in compliance with
the City s comprehensive plan
April 12 2010 EDA considers the Plans and passes a resolution adopting the Plans
April12 2010 City Council holds public hearing at 7 00 P M on a Modification to the
Redevelopment Plan for the Downtown Chanhassen Redevelopment Project Area
and the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No 10 and passes a
resolution approving the Plans Ehlers will send Council packet information via
email to the City on or by April 2 2010
City Council passes resolution authorizing an interfund loan in connection with Tax
Increment Financing District No 1 O
TBD Ehlers files TIF Plan with the MN Department of Revenue and the Office of the
State Auditor and requests certification of Tax Increment Financing District No 10
with Carver County
An action under subdivision 1 para raph a contesting the validity of a determination by an authority under section 469 175 subdivision 3 must be commenced WIthin the later of
l 180 days after the municipality s approval under section 469 175 subdivision 3 or
2 90 days after the request for certification of the district is filed with the county auditor under section 469 177 subdivision I
EHLERS
LtADEU Iff PU8UC FINANCE
9
I i
r
February 2 2010 Chanhassen Transit Station
10
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
770 0 MarketBoulevard
PO Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
Administration
Phone 952227 11 DO
Fax 952227 1110
Building Inspections
Phone 952227 1180
Fax 952 227 1190
Engineering
Phone 952227 1160
Fax 952227 1170
Finance
Phone 952 227 1140
Fax 952 227 1110
Park Recreation
Phone 952227 1120
Fax 952227 1110
Recreation Center
2310 Coulter Boulevard
Phone 952 227 1400
Fax 952227140 4
Planning
Natural Resources
Phone 952227 1130
Fax 952 227 1110
Public Works
1591 Park Road
Phone 952 227 130 0
Fax 952227 1310
SeniorCenter
Phone 952227 1125
Fax 952227 1110
Web Site
www ci chanhassen mn us
To Todd Gerhardt City Manager
Laurie Hokkanen Assistant City Manager JAf2 From
Date January 19 2010
SubjectKey Financial Strategies
Attached please find the compilation of the rankings awarded by the City
Council members to each of the suggested priorities for 2010 Items were
awarded a number with 1 representing high priorities and 4 representing low
priorities The average ranking can be found in the final column
During the work session the City Council will discuss the rankings From the
rankings the 2010 Key Financial Strategies will be selected
Chanhassen is a Community for Life Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow 11
2010
DRAFT
Key Financial Strategies
Strategic Plan
ABCDEFGH YearFurlongLitseyTjornhomMcDonaldErnstAbove Average Key
Principles 1 Competitiveness 2
2 8 200914144 Discuss the
benefits of the City
s dog and cat
licensing program LH 3
3
2 200831444
Consider Social Host Ordinance LH
4 Implement a Community
Survey that
will determine the City s
strengths weaknesses 1
8
201012222 and
community
needs LH
5 1 8 201022122
Work with Carver
County to expand utilization
of
Carver
County
License Center TG 6 1 8 201021213 Update Police Work Plan LH JO 7 1 4 201012112 Review City s Technology Policy RR 8 9 Strengthen the City s Financial Position 10 Select a few unfunded unproductive mandates for legislative review with assistance 1 6 201021212 of Metro Cities and other partners TG 11 Monitor Revenue Performance in 2010 take a proactive approach to budget 1 0 201011111 challenges keeping Council informed about the Revenue Expenditure relationship throughout the year quarterly reports and special updates when needed GS 12 Being proactive that all City staff and members of Boards Committees and 1 0 201011111 Commissions contribute to economic development TG 13 Review the City s Long Range Financial Plan including Pavement Management 1 0 201011111 System 5 yr budget Debt Analysis and Capital Improvement Plan Examine re timing of MUSA Expansion area including Fire Station 3 GS 14 15 Planning of the City s Infrastructure 16 3 4 Ampitheater Gathering Place TH 200333344 17 3 2 Consider Expansion of Cultural Activities TH 200633343 18 1 0 201011111 Review Pavement Management Assessment Policy PO 19 City of Chanhassen City Council Work Session January 11 2010 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 770 0 Market Boulevard PO Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
Administration
Phone 952 227 11 DO
Fax 952 227 1110
Building Inspections
Phone 952 227 1180
Fax 952 227 1190
Engineering
Phone 952 227 1160
Fax 952 227 1170
Finance
Phone 952 227 1140
Fax 952 227 1110
Park Recreation
Phone 952 227 1120
Fax 952 227 1110
Recreation Center
2310 Coulter Boulevard
Phone 952 227 1400
Fax 952 227 140 4
Planning
Natural Resources
Phone 952 227 1130
Fax 952 227 1110
Public Works
1591 Park Road
Phone 952 227 130 0
Fax 952 227 1310
Senior Center
Phone 952 227 1125
Fax 952 227 1110
Web Site
www ci chanhassen mn us
j To Todd Gerhardt City Manager Laurie Hokkanen Assistant City Manager JAf2 From Date January 19 2010 Subject Key Financial Strategies
Attached please find the compilation of the rankings awarded by the City
Council members to each of the suggested priorities for 2010 Items were
awarded a number with 1 representing high priorities and 4 representing low
priorities The average ranking can be found in the final column
During the work session the City Council will discuss the rankings From the
rankings the 2010 Key Financial Strategies will be selected
Chanhassen is a Community for Life Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow 12
2010
DRAFT
Key Financial Strategies
Strategic Plan ABCDEFGH YearFurlongLitseyTjornhomMcDonaldErnstAbove Average
Key Principles 1 2 1
0 201011111 Review Effect
of Delays on Pavement
Management System PO 20 Develop
a
Comprehensive Inter
Connecting Trail System with surrounding
2
0 201011233 communities
TH
21 1
0 201011111 Explore Opportunities for
Further
Partnerships i
e
Sealcoating PO
22 2
0 201022321
Develop alternative approaches
to reduce impervious
areas PO 23 Review
Future
Well
Needs
based on water usage and availability develop 1 2 201021111 educational work plan for Environmental Commission PO 24 25 Enhance Local Tax Base 26 Take an active role in the Public Private Redevelopment of the Chanhassen Dinner 1 2 201021111 Theatre and Chanhassen Transit Station area TG LH 27 Capture opportunities for Economic Development and position the City to be 1 0 201011111 attractive for private investment and reinvestment in the following areas Infrastructure transportation mobility utility capacity Reviewing City Policies and Processes to reduce costs and processing time for business development 28 Hold Forums to identify opportunities and barriers to attracting new housing 1 6 201021122 commercial industrial and jobs to Chanhassen TG KA 29 30 Ongoing Projects 31 2003 Monitor benchmarks for the police contract JO LH 32 Review relationships with outside agencies state county Local Business Council 2003 businesses civic organizations etc 33 2003 Monitor state and county financial situations and develop legislative priorities TG 34 2008 Leverage City property as much as possible Marketing of land ongoing TG LH 35 Promote economic development review permitted uses in zoning districts explore 2009 ways to introduce more flexibility KA 36 City of Chanhassen City Council Work Session January 11 2010
13
2010
DRAFT
Key Financial Strategies
Strategic Plan ABCDEFGH YearFurlongLitseyTjornhomMcDonaldErnstAbove Average
Key Principles
1 2
Support the marketplace driven
development of industrial
residential and 2009
commercial land TG
LH
KA
37
Work with other agencies to advance implementation of improvements for Highway 2009 101 from Lyman Blvd to Scott County Line Imp PO 38 Complete environmental documentation for reconstruction of TH 101 from Lyman 2009 Blvd to Pioneer Trail PO 39 2009 Look for partners for storm water capital improvement projects PO 40 2010 Emergency Preparedness Exercise TG 41 2010 Expand the number of Working Together Program meetings TG 42 City of Chanhassen City Council Work Session January 11 2010
14
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard
PO Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
Administration
Phone 952 227 1100
Fax 952 227 1110
Building Inspections
Phone 952 227 1180
Fax 952 227 1190
Engineering
Phone 952 227 1160
Fax 952 227 1170
Finance
Phone 952 227 1140
Fax 952 227 1110
Park Recreation
Phone 952 227 1120
Fax 952 227 1110
Recreation Center
2310 Coulter Boulevard
Phone 952 227 1400
Fax 952 227 1404
Planning
Natural Resources
Phone 952 227 1130
Fax 952 227 1110
Public Works
1591 Park Road
Phone 952 227 1300
Fax 952 227 1310
Senior Center
Phone 952 227 1125
Fax 952 227 1110
Web Site
www ci chanhassen mn us
6
MEMORANDUM
TO Todd Gerhardt City Manager
0
Paul Oehme Director of Public Works City Engineer FROM
DATE February 8 2010
SUBJ Discuss Road Assessment Practices and the Effects of Deferring
Road Construction Projects
BACKGROUND
Road Assessment Practices Policy
For the past six years staff has annually proposed street improvement projects to
keep the City street system in good repair These projects consist of total
replacement of the street reconstruction or resurfacing of the street
rehabilitation along with miscellaneous curb repairs The City s practice has
been to assess 40 of the street improvement costs to the benefiting property
owners that access the street proposed for improvements From time to time it is
advisable to review the assessment practice
Staff has received assessment information from other communities in the metro
area The assessment policies of these cities are far ranging on how the
assessments are calculated However for Cities that assess for street
reconstruction projects the range of assessments for single family homes R l
appears to be between 4 500 to 11 000 depending on the scope of the
improvement Some Cities assess for rehabilitation projects and others do not
For the Cities that do assess for street rehabilitations it appears the assessments
range between 800 to 2 000 The terms of the assessments for street
improvements also varies between 8 and 15 years
Three basic criteria must be satisfied before a particular parcel can be assessed
The criteria are as follows
1 The property must have received special benefit from the improvement
2 The amount of the assessment must not exceed the special benefit
3 The assessment must be uniform in relation to the same class of property
within the assessment area
Staffhas obtained special benefit reports for reconstruction areas to determine
what the special benefit is for the properties based on the proposed improvements
The ranges for these benefits to the single family properties ranged from 6 000
to 8 000
Chanhassen is a Community for Life Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow 15
Todd Gerhardt
Assessment Practices Road Projects
February 8 2010
Page 2
Some Cities assess based on front footages or other forms of lot size assessments while a few
Cities have a flat rate for assessments for single family units It appears the majority of Cities
surveyed assess based on per unit bases which tends to be the easiest for property owners to
understand
Some Cities surveyed assess for utility improvements while most cities tend to pay for these
improvements out of the utility enterprise funds
Deferring Road Construction Projects
For the past six years the City has done a good job keeping the streets maintained and
reconstructing streets that are in need of replacement based on recommendations by the
Pavement Management Program The City has taken on a preventative maintenance program
which consists of sealcoating and cracksealing that will help extend the life of the roadway
system
Due to funding constraints road improvements project are sometimes considered to be delayed
This approach may be thought of as prudent in the short term but in the long term will only cost
the City more
Keeping streets well maintained is considered an important function of City government Well
maintained streets are an asset for the community and help market the community to businesses
and families that may be considering moving into the community Well maintained streets are
also a quality of life consideration No one likes potholes distressed pavement or crumbling
streets that do not drain well in front of their homes Deferring street projects only pushes back
the inevitable project When projects are deferred they will cost potentially more in the future
and have greater assessments to the property owner Over the past 10 years the annual rate of
inflation for construction projects has been between 3 and 4 Deferring projects also will
push back other projects in the works and may delay the entire program Delaying street projects
also requires more time and money to be put towards patching the streets Patching the streets is
only a temporary fix and inevitably will require City crews to come back out regularly to keep
fixing the problem Typically the City will received complaints from property owners about the
condition of the streets in these areas
Staff is planning to present some impact to the pavement condition of the streets ifprojects are
deferred
Attachments 1 Excerpts from the League of Minnesota Cities Special Assessment Guide
2 Special Benefit Consultation Reports
3 City of Edina Special Assessment Policies
4 Email Correspondence
5 Assessment Policy Survey Results 2010
g eng paul memos bkgd ws 020810 special assessments doc
16
00
LEAGUE OF
MINNESOTA CITIES
GOVERNING MANAGING INFORMATION
Special Assessment
Guide
515A 1 A 3
August 2008
I HONE 651 281 J200
TOll FREE 800 925 1 J22
FAX 651 281 1299
WEB WWW LMC ORG
The League of Minnesota Cities provides this publication as a general
informational memo It is not intended to provide legal advice and should
not be used as a substitute for competent legal guidance Readers should
consult with an attorney for advice concerning specific situations
145 UNIVERSITY AVE WEST
ST PAUL MN 55J03 2044
@ 2008 League of Minnesota Cities
All rights reserved
17
Acknowledgements
The Special Assessment Guide presents information on a detailed statutory procedure and requires the
work of many staff members to create a new revision The League of Minnesota Cities acknowledges
especially the work of its Research department staff attorneys Jeanette Behr and Edward Cadman for their
work on this revision
The League of Minnesota Cities also acknowledges the following professionals for their contributions in
producing this Special Assessment Guide
Lee Gustafson Professional Engineer
City Engineers Association of Minnesota
St Paul Minnesota
Corrine A Heine Attorney
Kennedy Graven Chartered
Minneapolis Minnesota
Julie Jeffrey Schwartz Certified General Appraiser
President Lake State Realty Services Inc
White Bear Lake Minnesota
2 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
18
Acknowledgements 2
Special Assessment Guide 5
I What are special assessments 5
A What do special assessments pay for 6
B The special benefit test 6
C Practical points to consider 8
D Pros and cons of special assessments 10
E Special assessment policies 11
F Programs cities may finance with special assessments 12
II Synopsis of procedures 15
A Initiation of proceedings 15
B Feasibility report 17
C Initial considerations 17
D Prepare for the improvement hearing 19
E Improvement hearing 20
F Ordering the improvement 20
G Competitive bidding 21
H Prepare the proposed assessment rolls 24
I Prepare for the assessment hearing 24
1 Assessment hearing 25
III Challenges by property owners 26
A Objections 26
B Appeals to the district court 26
IV Levying and collecting assessments and interest 27
A Payment of assessments and interest 27
B Postponed assessments 28
C Deferred assessments 29
D Abandoned improvements 31
V Tax exempt property 31
A Other governmental lands 32
B Collecting assessments from tax exempt or railroad property 32
VI Corrections 33
A Supplemental assessments 33
B Reassessments 33
C Reapportionment 33
D Tax forfeited land returned to private ownership 34
VII Borrowing for special assessment purposes 34
A Interest on improvement bonds 36
B Interest on special assessments 36
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT GUIDE 3
19
VIII
A
B
C
D
E
F
IX
4
Charter cities 36
Special benefit test
36
Assessing unpaid charges
36
Voting requirements 37
Notice of right to appeal 37
Deferrals 37
Day labor 37
Forms 37
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
20
Special Assessment Guide
Minn Stat ell 429 Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 Chapter 429 gives cities authority to levy
special assessments Court decisions and attorney general opinions have
added to the complexity of the issue This Guide addresses the following
I What are special assessments
II Synopsis of procedure
III Challenges by property owners
IV Levying and collecting assessments
v Tax exempt and railroad property
VI Corrections
VII Borrowing for special assessment purposes
VIII Charter cities
IX Forms
I What are special
assessments
See Section VIII Charter cities
Special assessments are a charge imposed on properties for a particular
improvement that benefits the owners of those selected properties The
authority to use special assessments originates in the state constitution
which allows the state legislature to give cities and other governmental
units the authority to levy and collect assessments for local improvements
upon property benefited thereby The legislature confers that authority to
cities in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429
A charter city may choose to use either Chapter 429 or provisions of the
charter to assess for local improvements but even so state law requires that
charter cities follow state law in certain steps of the proceedings as
discussed subsequently
To ensure full protection for property owners state law and courts applying
that law insist on strict compliance with complex procedural requirements
Because these requirements have legal implications city councils should
have the city attorney guide assessment proceedings
Special assessments have three distinct characteristics
They are a levy a city uses to finance or partially finance a particular
public improvement program
The city levies the charge only against those particular parcels of
property that receive some special benefit from the program
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT GUIDE 5
21
Buzick v City of Blaine 505 N W 2d
51 Minn 1993
EHW Properties v City of Eagan
Minn Ct App 1993
Schumacher v City of Excelsior 427
N W 2d 235 Minn 1988
Tri State Land Co v City of
Shoreview 290 N W 2d 775 Minn
1980
6
The amount of the charge bears a direct relationship to the value of the
benefits the property receives
A What do special assessments pay for
Special assessments have a number of important uses
The most typical use is to pay for infrastructure in undeveloped areas
of a city particularly when the city is converting new tracts ofland to
urban or residential use Special assessments frequently pay for
opening and surfacing streets installing utility lines and constructing
curbs gutters and sidewalks
Special assessments may partially underwrite the cost of major
maintenance programs Cities often finance large scale repairs and
maintenance operations on streets sidewalks sewers and similar
facilities in part with special assessments
Another use of special assessments is the redevelopment of existing
neighborhoods Cities use special assessments when areas age and the
infrastructure needs updating
B The special benefit test
Special assessments reflect the influence of a specific local improvement
on the value of selected property No matter what method the city uses to
establish the amount of the assessment the real measure of benefit is
the increase in the market value of the land because of the
improvement
Under the special benefit test special assessments are presumptively valid
if
The land receives a special benefit from the improvement
The assessment does not exceed the special benefit measured by
the increase in market value due to the improvement
The assessment is uniform as applied to the same class of property
in the assessed area
Because special assessments are appealable to district court it is important
that the city considers the benefit to the property as a result of the specific
improvement Councils often do this by retaining a qualified licensed
appraiser At the hearings on the assessments the appraiser presents a
written or oral report on the increase in market value as a result of the
improvement
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
22
Buettner v City of St Cloud 277
N W 2d 199 Minn 1979
Southview County Club v City of
Inver Grove Heights 263 NW 2d
385 Minn 1978
Minn Canst art X S I
Ewert v City of Winthrop 278
NW 2d 545 Minn 1979
Bisbee v City ofFairmont 593
NW 2d 714 Minn Ct App 1999
Quality Homes Inc v Village of
New Brighton 289 Minn 274 193
N W 2d 555 1971
Anderson v City of Bemidji 295
N W 2d 555 Minn 1980
Village of Edina v Joseph 264
Minn 84 119 N W 2d 809 Minn
1962
Roberts 1 City ofOystal Lake 2003
WL 22481335 A03 172 Minn Ct
App Nov 4 2 03
Allen v City of Minneapolis 2003
WL 1962012 CI 02 l506 Minn
et App April 23 2 03
iaverberg v Cit v of Madison 2003
WI 178797 C8 02 l146 Minn Ct
App Jan 28 2003
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT GUIDE
A special assessment that exceeds the special benefit is a taking of property
without fair compensation and violates both the Fourteenth Amendment of
the United States Constitution and the Minnesota Constitution Property
assessed must enjoy a corresponding benefit from the local improvement
This is a different concept than property tax valuation The Minnesota
Constitution states The Legislature may authorize municipal corporations
to levy and collect assessments for local improvements upon property
benefited thereby without regard to cash valuation As the courts have
made clear the special benefit is the increase in market value of the land as
a result of the improvement
If a city s assessment is challenged in district court the assessment roD
constitutes prima facie or initial proof that an assessment does not exceed
the special benefit The party contesting the assessment must introduce
evidence sufficient to overcome that presumption If the evidence as to the
special benefit is conflicting it is the responsibility of the district court to
determine whether the assessment exceeds the market value increase and if
so by what amount
For this reason the city s assessment method should approximate market
analysis A formula that does not consider an analysis of the increase in
market value of each parcel may be invalid For instance a method using
only front footage in calculating assessments for street improvement
projects based on costs of street improvement projects from previous years
has been found arbitrary and invalid on its face
Courts often uphold special assessments based on evidence from the city s
qualified and licensed appraiser that the special benefit did not exceed the
increase in market value as a result of the improvement
7
23
See Eagle Creek Townhomes v City
of Shako pee 614 N W 2d 246
Minn Ct ApI 2000 Shorma
Family Trust v Maine Township
2002 WL 555323 C9 01 1548
Minn Ct App April16 20 2
Belanger v City of Long Lake 2000
WL 563896 CI 99 1347 Minn Ct
App May 9 2 00 Reiling v City if
Lino Lakes 2000 WL 369384 C7
99 1594 Minn Ct App Apr 11
2 00 Anderson v City ofBI falo
2000 WL 31791 C7 99 641 Minn
Ct API Jan 18 2000 Rohling 1
Ci F of Champlin 1999 WL 71484
C3 98 1209 Minn Ct API Feb
16 1999 unpublished decision
Guttard v City of Lake Park 1997
WL 457453 C8 97 207 Minn Ct
App Aug 12 997 In re Appeal
by Eastside Development C4 0 1
582 C6 01 583 2001 WL 1035280
Minn Ct App 20 1 unpuhlished
decision
In re Appeal by Eastside
Development 2001 WL 1035280
C4 0 1 582 Minn Ct App Sept ll
2001
Blomquist 1 City of Eagan 2001
WI 436187 C2 00 1591 Minn Ct
App May 1 2 01
JohnsonI C10 qfEagan 584
N W 2d 770 Minn 1998
In re Village of Burnsville 310
Minn 32 245 N W 2d 445 1976
Nordgren v City of Maplewood 326
NW 2d 640 Minn 1982
Minn Stat S 444 075
Smith v Spring Lake Township
2001 WL 1464455 CO 01 370
Minn Ct ApI Nov 20 2001
8
However in recent unpublished opinions the appellate courts have
routinely upheld decisions that went against the city because the district
court found a lack of adequate evidence of a market value increase equal to
or exceeding the amount of the special assessment
Especially with regard to street improvements it may be very difficult to
demonstrate that there is any significant increase in market value as a result
of the resurfacing or reconstruction
When a court disallows a portion of an assessment because it was in excess
of the benefit to the specific property the city may not try to recoup the
disallowed amount through another method such as by imposing a charge
for a utility line on only that property and not on the other properties
involved in the assessment When the cost of an improvement exceeds the
benefit the difference must not be borne by a particular property but
instead by the city as a whole
The Minnesota Supreme Court has held that connection charges based on
a different state law are not assessments and may be imposed on top of
prior assessments One unpublished Court of Appeals decision however
held that the cost of the connection charges should be included with the
amount of special assessments in determining the special benefit to the
property
C Practical points to consider
The following three strategies helps avoid the problem of proceeding on
estimates that do not equal actual revenue
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
24
2008 Minn Laws eh 207 4
amending Minn Stat 471345
Minn Stat 429 041 subd l
See Section IIA2 By council
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT GUIDE
1 Coordinating procedures
Chapter 429 allows coordinating the special assessment process with the
competitive bidding process and may protect the city from successful
appeals and ensuing budget shortfalls The city may determine the
assessment amount and prepare the assessment roll before work on the
local improvement even begins Effective Aug 1 2008 the competitive
bidding threshold for all cities regardless of size is 100 000 However
this new higher bid trigger does not apply to local improvement projects
under Chapter 429 because the law governing local improvement contracts
was not changed Thus such projects must still be bid if the estimated cost
exceeds 50 000 If needed the city may advertise for bids and allow
sufficient time after the bid closing date to permit the city to prepare the
assessment roll based on the lowest responsible bid the city receives and to
hold the assessment hearing the second hearing based on that low bid
The city then proceeds with the actual work of the project after
certification of the assessment roll and the 30 day appeal period is over
Using this coordinated procedure means the city knows both important
numbers up front how much money will be available through special
assessments and the cost of the local improvement Because the time for
appeals is over before the contract is issued the city will not need to cover
potential budget shortfalls that may occur if a property owner successfully
challenges a special assessment or the lowest bid comes in higher than
expected This Guide and the forms attached track this coordinated
procedural format
For larger projects in particular city councils should seriously consider
having provisions in the specifications that give the city more time to
accept or reject bids Either the city can make the improvement contract
conditional on the absence of objections filed within 30 days after the
assessment hearing or the city may specify in the bid documents or
specifications that the improvement work will not begin until 90 days after
the city receives bids Under both strategies the council would not enter
into a binding contract nor would any improvement work start until after
the improvement and assessment hearings and the time for appeals elapses
2 Specially assessing less of the cost
The city can also avoid appeals by paying a substantial portion of the cost
of all improvements out of general funds The larger the portion of cost the
city assumes the less the chances that any individual assessment would
exceed the benefit from the improvement as measured by the increase in
market value Indeed the council can proceed with the proposed
assessment based on estimates and plan to use monies from a reserve
fund from general taxes and other uncommitted sources of revenue making
up any difference between the assessments and the project cost
9
25
Ruzic v City afEden Prairie 479
NW 2d 417 Minn Ct App 1991
Minn Stat S 429 081
Minn Stat 462 3531
See Form 2
3 Waivers
The council might obtain under certain circumstances waivers of rights to
appeal before entering into the contract and ordering the improvement Any
waiver of rights is effective only for the amount of assessment agreed on
by the city and property owners or developers An effective waiver of
rights of appeal is essentially a contract and may contain additional
conditions providing for the increases in assessments that will not be
subject to appeal consult the city attorney for specific advice on effective
waivers
D Pros and cons of special assessments
Following is a summary of the advantages and disadvantages of special
assessment financing The council can avoid many of the disadvantages
with adequate plans and a long range capital improvement program
Advantages of special assessment financing include
Special assessments are generally a dependable source of revenue
Special assessments are a means of raising money outside city debt and
general property taxes Special assessment bonds do not count toward
statutory debt limitations
Special assessments provide a means of levying charges for public
services against property otherwise exempt from taxation
Special assessments lower the cost to the community of bringing
undeveloped land into urban use
Charging the property owner for the benefit received prevents or
minimizes the possibility that a property owner will reap a financial
profit from the improvement at the expense of the general taxpayer
Disadvantages of special assessment financing include
The difficulty and expense in establishing the special benefit to the
property
The difficulties in special assessment administration The
administrative procedures require careful execution in order to avoid
litigation
Cities have at times used special assessments to pay for premature
public improvements Because the city generally bears some of the cost
of every public improvement land speculators sometimes urge
councils to do unjustifiable special assessment programs
The availability of special assessment financing often tempts city
officials to underwrite the cost of governmental programs that should
be an obligation of the entire city
10 LEAGUE OF MlNNESOT A CITIES
26
See Section IB The special benefit
test
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT GUIDE
Unless special assessments conform to a city s long term financial and
capital improvement plans they can subject a city to two serious
financial dangers First if a city frequently undertakes special
assessment bond issues backed by the full faith and credit of a city in
an unplanned manner city credit might be overextended This leads to
higher interest charges on all city and school district borrowing and
increases the possibility of default Second placing too heavy a burden
on individual property owners with special assessments and regular
property taxes runs the risk of increasing tax delinquencies and
potentially jeopardizes a city s credit and borrowing position
From the council s point of view the public s reaction to a proposed
special assessment might be the most important determinative factor
While taxpayer resistance is usually minimal this is not true in every
instance Special assessment programs receive much greater public
support if the council adequately informs people of its intentions to
make the improvement the benefit the improvements will provide and
the necessary financial demands
E Special assessment policies
Some cities have attempted to minimize the controversy over special
assessment financing by adopting a special assessment policy not an
ordinance Whatever the policy provides it must adhere to the rule that the
amount of a special assessment cannot exceed the special benefit to the
property as measured by increase in market value due to the improvement
With frequent turnover on the council a policy may increase consistency in
the use of financing improvements with special assessments Justifying
council decisions in a particular case may also be easier with a policy in
place An updated and current special assessment policy may also facilitate
the development of a long range capital program for public improvements
A policy should reflect basic procedural decisions on financing local
improvements decisions that the council must think through carefully
taking into account past practice equity revenue productivity political
acceptability and the rest of the city s revenue system Practically
speaking many city special assessment policies provide procedures for
city specific issues such assessing oddly shaped lots corner lots lots with
septic systems and what method of assessment the city uses E g
inc1udingbut not limited to the area method of assessment unit method or
a per lot assessment Cities may wish to work with citizens appraisers an
attorney and city engineers to develop a special assessment policy that fits
the unique needs of their city
11
27
Minn Stat 429 021
Minn Stat S 429021 subd 1 1
Minn Stat S 429 021 subd 1 2
Minn Stat S 429 021 subd 1 3
Minn Stat S 429 021 subd 1 4
Minn Stal S 429 021 subd 1 5
See also Minn Stat S 444 075
See A G Op 387 B 10 Mar 8
1993
Minn Stat S 429091 subd 7a
Minn Stat S 429 021 sub 1 6
Minn Stat S 429 021 subd 1 7
Minn Stat S 429 021 subd 1 8
Minn Stat S 429 021 subd 1 9
Minn Stat S 429 021 subd 1 10
12
F Programs cities may finance with
special assessments
Generally cities use special assessments to at least partially finance a
variety of public improvements Cities may also use special assessments to
collect certain unpaid service charges discussed in the next section
1 Local improvements
Cities are statutorily authorized to finance the following public
improvements at least partially through special assessments
Streets sidewalks alleys curbs and gutters Acquiring opening and
widening streets and alleys constructing reconstructing and maintaining
sidewalks streets gutters curbs and vehicle parking strips These
projects may include charges for beautification storm sewers or other
street drainage systems and installation of connections from utilities to
curb lines
Storm and sanitary sewer systems Acquisition development
construction reconstruction extension and maintenance of storm and
sanitary sewer systems including outlets treatment plants pumps lift
stations and storm water holding areas and ponds
Steam heating mains Construction reconstruction extension and
maintenance
Street lighting systems Installation replacement extension and
maintenance
Waterworks systems Construction reconstruction extension and
maintenance This includes all appurtenances of a waterworks system
even the treatment plant Special assessments may also pay for the
infrastructure necessary to maintain water sewer and storm sewer
systems and for the payment of any obligations issued to pay the costs of
the waterworks facilities and systems or to refund bonds issued for those
purposes
Parks playgrounds and recreational facilities To acquire improve and
equip parks open space areas playgrounds and recreational facilities
within or without the corporate limits
Street trees Planting trimming care and removal
Abating nuisances Includes but not limited to draining and filling
swamps marshes and ponds on public or private property
Dikes and other flood control works Construction reconstruction
extension and maintenance
Retaining and area walls including highway noise barriers
Construction reconstruction extension and maintenance
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
28
Minn Stat 429 021 subd 1 11
See also Minn Stat S 429 031
subd 3
Minn Stat S 429 021 subd 1 12
Minn Stat 429 021 subd 1 13
Minn Stat S 429 021 suM 1 14
Minn Slat S 429 021 subd I 5
See also Minn Stat S 429 031
subd 3
Minn Stat 429 021 subd l l j
Minn Stat 429 021 subd 1 17
Minn Stat 429 021 suM 1 18
Minn Slat S 429 021 subd 1 19
Minn Stat S 429 021 subd 1 20
Minn Stat 429 031 suM 3
Minn Stat S 459 14
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT GUIDE
Pedestrian skyway systems Construction reconstruction maintenance
and promotion of bridges overpasses hallways plazas elevators and
escalators on public or private property A petition for a pedestrian skyway
system must meet unique statutory requirements
Underground pedestrian concourses Construction reconstruction
maintenance and promotion of tunnels arcades plazas elevators and
escalators
Malls Acquisition construction improvement alteration extension
operation maintenance and promotion of public malls plazas or
courtyards
District heating systems Construction reconstruction extension and
maintenance of district heating systems
Fire protection systems Construction in existing buildings upon petition
of owners A petition for a fire protection system on public or private
property must meet unique statutory requirements
Highway sound barriers Acquisition construction reconstruction
improvement alteration extension and maintenance of highway sound
barriers
Gas and electric distribution facilities Improvement construction
reconstruction extension and maintenance of gas and electric distribution
facilities owned by a municipal gas or electric utility
Markers relating to 911 services Purchase installation and maintenance
of signs posts and other address markers related to the operation of
enhanced 911 services
Internet access Improvements construction extension and maintenance
of facilities for Internet access and other communication purposes if the
council finds that the facilities
Are necessary to make Internet access or other communications
services available that are not and will not be available through
other providers or the private market in the reasonably foreseeable
future
Provide services that will not compete with service provided by
private entities
Burying overhead utility lines within the public right of way Cities can
only finance the burying of overhead utility lines with special assessments
in response to a petition from all the abutting landowners In addition
burying the lines in the public right of way must exceed the utility s design
and construction standards or those set by law tariff or franchise In that
situation all or a portion of the costs associated with burying the lines or
altering a new or existing distribution system can be specially assessed as
agreed to with an electric utility telecommunications carrier or cable
system
Parking facilities Acquisition and construction
13
29
PAToCHINMESSNER DODD
VALUATION COUNSELORS
December Jli 2007
City ofChanhassen
c o Campbell KnLitson P A
317 EagandaleOffice Center
1380 Corporate C nter Curve
Eagan MN 5512J
ATTN Mr Thomas M Scott
RE specialBenefit Consultation
I aredo Drive Area
Street Reconstruction Project
Cbarihassen M i n nesota
Dear Mr Scott
At your request we have investigated and analyzed probahle special benefit to be derived
from the above referenced street i niprovement project I ncl udedi n the city improvement
project is the reconstruction of bitumi nous surfa edstreetsto city standard street design with
improvements to the storm sewer andreplacement ofwate main and sanitary sewer laterals
and serVices as needed
The purpose of this consultatiQn is to provide a typical range of spedal bene fit anticipatedfor
single familyresidential properties an18 unitapartment property two commercial
properties and thre institl ltional properties in the proposed project area The Junction of
thisanalysisisto provide guidance to theCityof Chanhassenin assessing the feasibility of
the Laredo Drive Area street reconstruction project
This real estate consultation is intended to comply with Standards 4 and Sof the Uniform
Standards of ProfessiOnal Appraisal Practice USPAP In estimating anticipated special
benefit to properties in the projectarea individual single family residentesor commercial
and publicproperties in the area have not specifically beenapprais ed Rather thisanalysis
attempts to quantify probable special benefit directly whiCh can then be applied to typical
properties within the Laredo Drive reconstruction project area
B aseclon the data and analyses as sLlmmarizea n tbeattached reportias elLasadditionaI
information and documentationretained intheappraisers files itisanticipatedthat sing le
family residential properties benefiting from the prQposed improvement project will be
enhanced in yalue byapproximateIY 7 SOO to 8 000 per assessable unit lot while noh
single family residential properties win benefit as tollows
30
II
Property
18 Unit Apartment Building
Retail Center
Bank
Post Office
Fire Station
Elementary School
Anticipated Range of Benefit
26 000 to 29 000
20 000 to 22 000
16 000to 18 000
4 DOOto 5 000
11 000 to 13 000
67 000 to 72 000
This consultation hasA been made in conformity with accepted profes ional ethical and
performance standards of real estate appraisal practice The Contingent arid Limiting Conditions section of this report should be thoroughly read and understood before relying
on any information or analysis presented herein
Thank you for allowing our firmto be of assistance in this matter If you have any questions after reading this report feel free to contact us at your convenience
Respectfully submitted
PATCHIN MESSNER AND DODD
C W5 Joshua D Kelly
Minnesota Trainee Real Property
Appraiser License 20549872
a tn L Messn r MAl
MmnesotaCertlfled General Real Property
Appraiser License 4000836
PATCHIN MESSNER DODD 31
I
I
I
I
I c
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
PATCHIN MESSNER DoDD
VALUATION COUNSELORS
c
January 18 2006
City of Chanhassep
c o Campbell Knutson P A
317 EagandaleOffiCe Center
1380 Corporate Center Curve
Eagan MN 55121
A TTN Mr Thomas M Scott
RE Special BeneritConsultation
Koehnen Area
Street Reconstn lction Project Chanhasseni Mjnnesota
Dear Mr Scott
At your request we have investigated and analyzed probable special benefit to be derived
from the above referenced street improvement project lndudedin theeity improvement project is the reconstruction of bituminous surfaced streetS with concrete curb arid gutter stormsewer sanitarysewera ndwater main services
The purpose of this consultationisio provide a typical range of special benefit anticipated for
single family residentiaLproperties in thepfoposed project area Jhe function ofthisanalysis
is to provide guidance to the City of Chanhasseninassessingthe feasibility of the Koebnen
Area street reconstruction project
This real estate consultation is intended to comply with Standards 4 and 5 oLtheUniform
Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice USPAP lrLestimatingantidpated special
benefit to properties in the project area individLial single family residences or lots in the area
have not specifically been appraised Rather this analysis attempts to quantify probable
specialbenefitdirectly whic hcanthenbe applied to typical residential properties within the
Koehnen street recoristructicmpr jectarea
Based on the data and analyses as summarized in the attached report as well as addition 1
information anddocumentation retained in the appraisers files it is anticipated that
properties benefiting from the proposed improvement project will be enhanced in value by approximately 6 500to 7 500perassessable unit lot
I
l
Sunset Ponds OfficePar 13967 West Preserve BouleVard Burnsville MN 55337
Phone 952 895 1205 FClX 9 2 895 1521
32
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
This cOl1sultation has been made in onformity with accepted professional ethical and
perfon nance standards of real estate appraisaL practice The Contingent and limiting Conditions section of this reportshouldbethoroughlyread and understood before relying
on any i nformaHon or analysis presented herein
Thariky6u for allowing our firm to be of assistance in this matter If you haveany questions afterreading this report feel free to contact us at your convenience
RespectfuUy su mitted
PATCHIN MESSNER AND DODD
JJtJ
Sherrill Brumm
Minnesota Certified General Real Property
Appraiser License 20249948
d
jasn LMessner MAl
Minnesota Certified General Real Property
Appraiser License 4000836
33
PATCHIN MESSNER DODD
VALUATION COUNSELORS
May 7 2004
City of Chanhassen
do Campbell Knutson P A
31 7 Eagandale Office Center
1380 Corporate Center Curve
Eagan MN 55121
A TTN Mr Thomas M Scott
RE Special Benefit Consultation
Santa Fe and Del Rio Area
Street Reconstruction Project
Chanhassen Minnesota
Dear Mr Scott
At your request we have investigated and analyzed probable special benefit to be derived
from the above referenced street improvement project Included in the city improvement
project is the reconstruction of bituminous surfaced streets with concrete curb and gutter
storm sewer sidewalk on one side of Santa Fe Trail and Del Rio Drive sanitary sewer and
water main services
The purpose of this consultation is to provide a typical range of special benefit anticipated for
single family residential properties in the proposed project area The function of this analysis
is to provide guidance to the city of Chanhassen in assessing the feasibility of the Santa Fe
and Del Rio Area street reconstruction project
This real estate consultation is intended to comply with Standards 4 and 5 of the Uniform
Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice USPAP In estimating anticipated special benefit to properties in the project area individual single family residences or lots in the area
have not specifically been appraised Rather this analysis attempts to quantify probable
special benefit directly which can then be applied to typical residential properties within the
Santa Fe and Del Rio street reconstruction project area
Based on the data and analysis as summarized in the attached report as well as additional
information and documentation retained in the files properties benefiting from the proposed
improvement project will be enhanced in value by approximately 6 000 to 7 0 00 per assessable unit lot
Skyline Square Building Suite 220 12940 Harriet Avenue South Burnsville MN 55337
Phone 952 895 1205 Fax 952 895 1521
34
II
This consultation has been made in conformity with accepted professional ethical and
performance standards of real estate appraisal practice The Contingent and Limiting
Conditions section of this report should be thoroughly read and understood before relying
on any information or analysis presented herein
The undersigned appraisers hereby certify that sufficient information believed to indicate
enhancement in value has been investigated and that to the best of our knowledge and
beliefs the statements contained in this consultation and the opinions expressed herein are
correct subject to the limiting conditions herein set forth If you have any questions or
comments after reading the report please contact the firm
Respectfully submitted
PATCHIN MESSNER AND DODD
N
Sherril L Brumm
Minnesota Registered Real Property
Appraiser License 20249948
Jason L Messner MAl
Minnesota Certified General License
Appraiser License 4000836
PATCHIN MESSNER DODD 35
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT POLICY
The Special Assessment Policy was approved in August 2005 Elements of the Special
Assessment Policy include
The assessable unit for non State Aid street projects will be the residential
equivalent unit REU of a lot rather than the front footage of the property
If a corner lot is subject to multiple street reconstruction assessments over a
period of years the total assessable cost will be the equivalent of one REU
Assessments must be equitable to all homes that are being assessed
The term of residential roadway assessments will continue to be 10 years
The interest rate of the assessment will be pegged to assessment bonds that
have been issued in the past 12 months or the 10 year Aaa bond rate plus 2
percentage points
The City will accept both partial pre payments and full pre payments on
assessments before certifying the assessment to the tax rolls For ease of
administration a minimum of 25 percent of the assessable cost must be
applied for a partial payment
Assessments will be calculated on a declining payment schedule because it is
cheaper than a mortgage style amortized schedule
In addition elements of the Senior Deferral Program have changed for equity and
fairness The new policy will not be retroactive to projects that have already been
assessed
You ll need version 3 01 or later of Adobe Acrobat
Reader to view and print the Police
S p ecial As s e Jr ent
Policy
Municip gl gte AlQ
Assessment Policy
Download the Special Assessment Policy
Download the Municipal State Aid Assessment Policy
C 6
36
z 40
Approved by Council 8 16 05
Special Assessment Policy Proposal
August 16 2005
1 Cost of Non State Aid Residential Street Curb and Gutter will be financed by the
Stormwater Utility Fund For the 2004 2005 assessment projects this will require
an increase in Storm water rates of approximately 2 00 per household per quarter
Rationale The curb and gutter system is an above the ground water drainage system that
controls storm water within the City Staff feels very strongly about the addition of curb and
gutter in the City where it does not exist today It is very important in areas of poor soil
condition steep grade changes or very flat conditions It also decreases the degradation of
the residential roadway system reduces fall and spring street maintenance and aids in street
cleaning and snow plowing
Projects to be reimbursed by proposed change to be assessed Oct 2005
Halifax Grimes 137 000 approx 24 of street costs
Shannon Dr 18 000 100 of assessable costs
Sunnyslope 40 000 6 of assessable costs
Bridge Lane 10 000 9 of assessable costs
Schaefer Circle 14 000 petition requesting C G only if policy is approved
Total 219 000
Curb and Gutter Cost Projections for Future Year Assessment Projects
Estimated cost for 2006 441 000 2 14 per household per quarter
Estimated cost for 2007 621 000 1 56 per household per quarter
Attachment Survey of Stormwater Utility Rates 2005
Note Stormwater rates will need approximately a 1 50 2 00 per quarter increase to cover
the cost of proj ects occurring independent of this policy If adopted staff will be proposing a
4 00 per household per quarter increase this fall
2 Street Reconstruction Cost excluding curb and gutter should be assessed at 100
of the cost
Rationale Based on an appraisal study conducted by the Valuation Group the consultants
indicated that the market value benefit of the street improvements equates to the cost of the
improvements being done Assuming Council agrees with the financing of curb and gutter
improvements the risk of losing an assessment challenge by a resident or neighborhood is
diminished due to the extensive study that was conducted and the subsidy of the curb and
Page 1 of 5
37
gutter cost In most projects the street reconstruction cost represents only a percentage of
the entire project costs Most projects include other storm water improvements as well as
sanitary sewer and water system improvements The table below shows the total and
assessable costs of projects that will be assessed this fall or next year depending on
construction completion
Cost of All Curb Assessable
Proiect Improvements Gutter Cost Assessable
Halifax Grimes 888 900 137 000 420 000 47
So Harriet Park 1 029 872 588 000 57
Sunnyslope 1 028 218 40 000 663 000 64
Schaefer Rd 264 290 195 000 74
Shannon Dr 168 719 18 000 0
Bridoe Lane 106 601 9 975 97 000 91
3 The assessable unit for non state aid residential street projects should be the
residential equivalent unit Lot rather than the front footage of the lot
Rationale Trips generated for residential lots are the same regardless of the size of the lot
A resident on a comer lot cul de sac or circular street does not use the roads differently than
a mid block resident on the same street
4 If a corner lot is subject to multiple street reconstruction assessments over a period
of years the total assessable cost should be the equivalent to 1 residential equivalent
unit
Rationale Current policy allows the assessment of the front of a comer lot to be assessed at
one R E V and the side lot for another assessment project to be assessed at 1 3 of an R E V
Staff believes that the total of both assessments should not exceed one R E V so that lots are
equitably assessed over the City A comer lot does not generate more trips onto the
residential roadway system than a non comer lot
5 Multiple Assessments cannot be treated differently than areas with one assessment
being incurred
Rationale Assessments must be equitable to all homes that are being assessed This issue
was driven by the potential of a portion of the Country Club being assessed for sound walls
and residential road reconstruction If and when the Country Club area gets assessed for
street improvements you have the option to re assess the sound wall improvement to a
longer term By re assessing the Council opens the assessment up to a potential challenge
If a challenge was raised you could leave the sound wall assessment at the current term of 15
years and decide not to re assess
Page 2 of 5
38
6 The term of residential roadway reconstruction assessments should stay at 10 years
Rationale There was some discussion of extending the term of residential roadway
reconstruction to 15 years While this would be legal rating agencies prefer the term for
residential assessments to match the term of the bonds This would also increase the interest
cost to the homeowner
7 Assessment Interest Rate The interest rate of the assessment should be pegged to
the assessment bonds that have been issued in the past 12 months or the 10 year Aaa
bond rate plus 2
Rationale The City s assessments of the past number of years have been charged a fixed
rate of 6 5 The number and dollar amount of improvement projects have allowed the City
to internally finance the capital cost of the improvements With the amount of improvements
occurring this year and in future years the City has incorporated a public debt component to
the special assessment process The bonds are General Obligation G O debt that is used to
pay the construction costs and are supported by the stream of assessment payments over the
term ofthe bonds 10 years
Because the City is using G O public improvement bonds to finance the improvements
State law requires that the amount of assessments or taxes that come in each year
must equal 105 of the debt service payment on the bonds for each year In order to
achieve the necessary 105 the assessment interest rate needs to be pegged at the bond s
interest rate plus 2 or approximately 5 9 Some cities have a lower rate than this because
they have taxes supporting the bonds or they internally finance their public improvements
Of the cities we studied only one had a lower interest rate than the one staff is proposing
City Calculation
Bond Rate 2
Bond Rate 1
Prime Rate 5
None
None
Index
3 92
3 92
6 25
Assessment
Rate
5 92
4 92
6 75
6 50
6 00
Edina
BloominQton
Plvmouth
Fridlev
Maple Grove
The excess dollars generated by the statutory 105 requirement is used to make up for cost
of bond issuance delinquencies and underpayments
8 The City will accept both partial pre payments and full pre payments on
assessments before going to the County for tax rolls For ease of administration a
minimum of 25 of the assessable cost must be applied for a partial payment
Rationale City past practice allowed only 100 pre payment on assessments Many
residents have inquired in the past about partial pre payments to reduce their annual tax bill
This will create some extra calculations but this is a good public relations move with a minor
increase in workload The full and partial pre payments can only occur after the assessment
Page 3 of 5
39
hearing and before the certification to the County This is gives the resident approximately
30 days to make the payment Staff will make sure extra information is provided to the
residents when they get their formal assessment notice information before the hearings
9 Payment Schedule Currently assessments are calculated on a level principal
payment schedule This results in a declining payment schedule which is cheaper
than a traditional amortized schedule which would have equal payments over the
life of the assessment Staff recommends that the declining balance schedule
continue to be used because of the lower total cost
Rationale See Level Principal Payments vs Amortized Level Total Payments below
Level Principal Payments
Levy 12 000
Interest Rate 6
Term 10 vears
Total
Year Principal Interest Payment Balance
1 1 200 720 1 920 10 800
2 1 200 648 1 848 9 600
3 1 200 576 1 776 8 400
4 1 200 504 1 704 7 200
5 1 200 432 1 632 6 000
6 1 200 360 1 560 4 800
7 1 200 288 1 488 3 600
8 1 200 216 1 416 2 400
9 1 200 144 1 344 1 200
10 1 200 72 1 272
Total Cost 15 960
Amortized Level Total Payment
Levy 12 000
Interest Rate 6
Term 10 years
Total
Year Princioal Interest Payment Balance
1 910 42 720 1 630 42 11 089 58
2 965 04 665 38 1 630 42 10 124 54
3 1 022 94 607 47 1 630 42 9 101 60
4 1 084 32 546 10 1 630 42 8 017 28
5 1 149 38 481 04 1 630 42 6 867 90
6 1 218 34 412 07 1 630 42 5 649 56
7 1 291 44 338 97 1 630 42 4 358 12
8 1 368 93 261 49 1 630 42 2 989 19
9 1 451 06 179 35 1 630 42 1 538 13
10 1 538 13 92 29 1 630 42 0 00
Total Cost 16 304 15
Page 4 of5
40
Council could provide an option on more expensive projects to select an amortized level
payment schedule but this needs to be selected for the entire project The amount of time
provided to staff to certify the assessments to the County doesn t allow for mixing and
matching of payment schedules for each assessment project
10 The new policy will not be retroactive to projects that have already been assessed
Rationale It would be very difficult to determine how many years to go back and re assess
projects that have been completed and already assessed Looking back at projects that were
assessed since 1999 most of the projects were assessed at a cost per lot of around 2 000
4 000 per lot The 2004 Maple Rd lWhite Oaks assessment cost 5 941 per lot This year s
projects have taken a substantial jump in total cost due to the need to reconstruct vs reclaim
the street pavement Estimates for this year s project range from 7 200 10t for So Harriet
Park to 11 OOO lot for Sunnyslope As we forecast future street projects our estimates
indicate most will be in the 8 000 12 000 per lot range
Our research with other City s policies indicates that all cities made a clean break when
beginning their new programs
A couple of elements of the Senior Deferral Program should change for equity and
fairness
Rationale
a The current interest rate for the deferral program is one percentage point higher than the
standard assessment rate This should be changed to reflect the new interest rate adopted
in this policy bond rate plus 2
b The current deferral policy requires that both spouses live in the residence This should
be changed to reflect situations that have one of the spouses residing in a facility that
accommodates health care situations i e assisted living centers etc
Some other administrative changes application dates etc would be made to the policy
If Council agrees with the changes to the Senior Deferral Program Staff would prepare the
appropriate resolution to bring back to Council for approval in September
Page 5 of 5
41
MUNICIPAL STATE AID SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
POLICY
CITY OF EDINA
Municipal State Aid Special Assessment Policy
December 5 2006 Adopted by City Council
PURPOSE
HISTORY
The City Council adopted a local roadway assessment policy in
2005 At that time the City Council requested that staff analyze our
current practice of special assessments on Municipal State Aid
Roadways This report analyzes the existing practice of how the
City applies special assessments for Municipal State Aid Roadway
Reconstruction Projects and if this practice should be revised
The City of Edina currently has over 200 miles of roadways within
our boundaries 40 miles of these roadways are designated as
Municipal State Aid MSA roadways A MSA roadway is
designated through the State of Minnesota under State Statute
Chapter 162 Funds for the MSA system are appropriated from the
State Gas Tax The State of Minnesota through the Department of
City of Edina
Municipal State Aid Streets
State Aid Streets N
N
S
I I JlltilllgD pt
Ftl n EI 2003
42
Municipal State Aid Special Assessment Policy
December 5 2006
Page 2
Transportation allocates funds and administers their requirements
for the reconstruction of these designated roadways The City of
Edina is appropriated approximately 1 2 Million dollars per year to
be used for reconstruction of MSA roadways MSA roadways are
typically functionally classified as collectors or above meaning that
these roadways carry more traffic than a local roadway would
carry see attached Existing Traffic Volumes A typical residential
local roadway carries around 1 000 vehicles per day or less The
City s designated MSA roadways are shown in the figure above
In 2005 the City Council adopted a local roadway assessment
policy to cover the non MSA roadways see attached policy This
policy includes the following synopsis
1 Curb and gutter costs to be funded through the
Stormwater Utility Fund
2 Street reconstruction cost to be assessed at 100 of
the cost
3 Assessable unit shall be residential equivalent unit
REU rather than front footage of lot
4 Multiple assessments should never be more than
REU per lot
5 Multiple assessments cannot be treated differently
6 The term of the assessment should stay at 10 years
7 Assessment interest rate should be 2 over a Aaa
Bond rate
8 Pre and partial payments shall be accepted on projects
9 Payment schedule should remain at a level principal
payment schedule
10 The new policy shall not be retroactive
Reconstruction of MSA roadways have been special assessed in
the past and have been assessed based on assessable front
footage Prior to 2004 the MSA special assessments were
assessed at a set front footage rate of 20 per front foot for
residential properties and 45 per front foot for commercial
properties The special assessment percentage of construction
cost for these projects ranged from 21 to 24 see chart below
of Cost per
Project From To MSA assessable
Cost lineal foot
Malonev Avenue Washinaton Avenue Blake Road 22 20 00
West 66th Street TH100 Vallev View Road 21 20 00
West 77th Street Pentaaon Park Parklawn Avenue 24 45 00
Valley View Road West 65th Street Wooddale Avenue 20 49 12
Wooddale Avenue Valley View Road West 56th Street 20 32 90
West 58th Street Concord Avenue Wooddale Avenue 20 67 91
43
Municipal State Aid Special Assessment Policy
December 5 2006
Page 3
POLICY BACKGROUND The assessments shown above indicate that approximately 20 of
the MSA construction cost has been specially assessed back to
the adjoining property If this amount is increased the additional
monies can be utilized for additional MSA roadway projects The
table below shows the increase in monies available over a five
year period our typical length of the Capital Improvement
Program
Year Allocated
Amount Additional Funds Generated per Assessed Amount
25 30 35 40
2007 1 200 000 60 000 120 000 180 000 240 000
2008 1 200 000 60 000 120 000 180 000 240 000
2009 1 200 000 60 000 120 000 180 000 240 000
2010 1 200 000 60 000 120 000 180 000 240 000
2011 1 200 000 60 000 120 000 180 000 240 000
Total5 Year Extra Amount 300 000 600 000 900 000 1 200 000
Special assessments for MSA projects have been typically based
on assessable front footage Staff has analyzed using the REU
methodology for assessing MSA projects Example 1 includes a
typical two lane roadway that includes a small City Park The City
Park was analyzed for equivalent build able lots versus activities of
the park the greater REU was assigned Example 2 includes a
typical two lane roadway with a school campus along one side of
the roadway The school campus assessments were analyzed
based on trips per day from the campus versus equivalent build
able lots Example 3 includes both residential and a small
segment of commercial
A typical 60 foot residential property is summarized below for both
the existing practice of Assessable Front Footage analysis and
proposed REU analysis
EXAMPLE COST PER OF MSA COST Based on LN FT
25 30 35 40
2 054 40 2 464 80 2 875 80 3 286 80
2 431 80 2 918 40 3 405 00 3 891 60
2 467 20 2 961 00 3 454 20 3 948 00
1
2
3
Note Existing percentage
EXAMPLE COST PER OF MSA COST Based on REU
25 30 35 40
2 712 12 3 254 55 3 796 97 4 339 39
2 525 77 3 030 92 3 536 08 4 041 23
2 562 14 3 031 36 3 536 59 4 041 82
20
1 2 169 70
2 2 020 62
3 2 020 91
Note Proposed Percentage
44
Municipal State Aid Special Assessment Policy
December 5 2006
Page 4
Example 4 includes only commercial see attached preliminary
assessment role In Example 4 staff applied the Residential
Equivalent Unit Summary for the different types of land uses see
below Access to the site was also considered in applying REU s
Staff recommends that this methodoloov be evaluated for each
individual proiect where commercial or other mixed use
developments exist
Current Land Use Class
Residential Sin Ie Famil Dwellin
Residential Two Family
Du lexes Quads
Residential Apartments
Condominiums Cooperatives
Nurseries Convalescent Homes
Industrial
Office Retail Financial Institutions
Public Buildin s Cit
Public Buildin s Schools
Churches
Notes 1 Per Unit
2 Per Gross Floor Area 1000 SF
3 All uses allowed in Planned Industrial
Development PID except offices and retail
REU Notes
1 0 1
0 8
0 5 1
0 5 2 3
1 5 2
0 9 2
0 2 2
0 8 2
COST PER OF MSA COST USING LF REU ANALYSIS
Type of Property 20 25 30 35 40
LF REU LF REU LF REU LF REU LF REU
Commercial
50 000 SF Blda 14 050 39 070 17 560 48 840 21 080 58 610 24 600 68 370 28 110 78 140
Commercial
170 000 SF Blda 40 710 44 270 50 890 55 340 61 070 66 405 71 250 77 480 81 430 88 540
PROPOSED POLICY In accordance with State Statute 429 the amount of an
assessment levied on a property may not exceed the benefits
received A cost benefit analysis would show that a certain benefit
is realized by properties adjacent to MSA roadways However it is
understood that due to the character of MSA roadways adjacent
properties should not fund 100 percent of these improvements
Traffic on MSA roadways where single family residential
properties exist typically have on an average of over three times
the amount Average Daily Trips ADT than on a local roadway
The following is recommended to be included with this policy
1 Cost of Municipal State Aid MSA Street Curb and Gutter
will be financed by either MSA funds or by the Storm Water
Utility Fund
45
Municipal State Aid Special Assessment Policy
December 5 2006
Page 5
2 Street Reconstruction Costs excluding curb and gutter
on MSA streets should be assessed at 20 percent of the cost
3 The assessable unit for Municipal State Aid street
projects shall be based on the residential equivalent unit
REU per Lot rather than the front footage of the lot REUs
will be prorated to parcels based on trip generation for the
land uses relative to the typical single family residential land
use Non single family or other mixed use developments
should be evaluated for each project based on the following
factors trip generation of the site access to the site unique
trip generation or other special circumstances
4 If a corner lot is subject to multiple street reconstruction
assessments over a period of years the total assessable cost
should be the equivalent to 1 residential equivalent unit
5 Multiple Assessments cannot be treated differently than
areas with one assessment being incurred
6 The term of MSA roadway reconstruction assessments
will be 10 years
7 Assessment Interest Rate The interest rate of the
assessment should be pegged to the assessment bonds that
have been issued in the past 12 months or the 10 year Aaa
bond rate plus 2
8 The City will accept both partial pre payments and full
pre payments on assessments before going to the County for
tax rolls For ease of administration a minimum of 25 of the
assessable cost must be applied for a partial payment
9 Payment Schedule Currently assessments are
calculated on a level principal payment schedule This results
in a declining payment schedule which is cheaper than a
traditional amortized schedule which would have equal
payments over the life of the assessment Staff recommends
that the declining balance schedule continue to be used
because of the lower total cost
10 The new policy will not be retroactive to projects that
have already been assessed and or where project
assessments are pending
ATTACHMENTS
1 Existing 1997 traffic volumes for Municipal State Aid Roadways
2 Examples 1 4 of the preliminary assessment roles which include
the 20 25 30 35 and 40 comparisons
3 Current approved Local Special Assessment Policy
4 Current final assessment roles for local roadway projects
46
Oehme Paul
From
Sent
To
Subject
Oehme Paul
Monday January 25 2010 8 07 AM
Randy Raddatz
RE Street improvements curb gutter and
utility improvements in Minnewashta Heights
Randy
We are still planning to make the improvements in this area the summer of 2012
Regards
Paul Oehme P E
Director of Public Works City Engineer
City of Chanhassen
7700 Market Boulevard
P O Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
Ph 952 227 1169
email poehme@cLchanhassen mn us
From Randy Raddatz mailto randyjcoach@yahoo com
Sent Sunday January 24 2010 3 36 PM
To Oehme Paul
Cc Furlong Tom
Subject Street improvements curb gutter and utility improvements in Minnewashta Heights
Good afternoon
Another year has passed so I m just checking to see if the street improvements described below are still
scheduled to occur no later than 2012
Thanks
Randy Ra ldatz
6340 Elm Tree Avenue
From Oehme Paul poehme@ci chanhassen mn us
To randyjcoach@yahoo com randyjcoach@yahoo com
Cc Furlong Tom tfurlong@ci chanhassen mn us
Sent Mon December 29 20088 19 44 AM
Subject RE Re Street improvements curb gutter in Minnewashta Heights
Randy
We are still scheduling a street reconstruction in this area for 2012
1
47
The City s assessment practice for street reconstruction is the benefiting property owners be assessed 40 ofthe street
improvement cost For residential areas the property owners are assessed equally The amount of street frontage a
property owners has does not figure into the assessment amount The remainder ofthe street cost is paid by the City
All the utility improvement costs would be paid by the City The utility improvements in this area would include sanitary
sewer watermain and storm sewer
Let me know if you have any additional questions
Sincerely
Paul Oehme P E
Director of Public Works City Engineer
City of Chanhasscn
noo Market Boulevard
P O Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
Ph 952 227 1169
From Randy Raddatz mailto randyjcoach@yahoo com
Sent Friday December 26 2008 4 41 PM
To Oehme Paul
Cc Furlong Tom
Subject Fw Re Street improvements curb gutter in Minnewashta Heights
Good afternoon
I would like to confirm that the street improvements schedule addressed in a series of e mails a little more than
a year ago see below is still in place especially the following key items
1 The City still has the streets from Greenbriar Avenue to Dogwood Avenue scheduled for reconstruction curb
gutter no later than 2012
2 The City will pick up a major portion of the cost with every homeowner being assessed equally for the
remaining cost regardless of the amount of street frontage each homeowner owns
I would appreciate your response to this e mail
Thanks
Randy Raddatz
6340 Elm Tree Avenue
On Tue 11 20 07 Randy Raddatz randyjcoach@yahoo com wrote
From Randy Raddatz randyjcoach@yahoo com
Subject Re Street improvements curb gutter in Minnewashta Heights
To Tom Furlong tfurlong@apexfsi com
Date Tuesday November 20 2007 4 54 PM
Yes that is my understanding thanks for the follow up e mail
Original Message
From Tom Furlong tfurlong@apexfsi com
To Randy Raddatz randyjcoach@yahoo com
Cc Gerhardt Todd TGerhardt@ci chanhassen mn us
2
48
Sent Tuesday November 20 20073 19 06 PM
Subject RE Street improvements curb gutter in Minnewashta Heights
Randy
Upon receiving your email this morning I asked Paul Oehme to provide details of the city s current long term
schedule for our local street improvement projects just so there is no misunderstanding Paul s email is shown
below I believe this is consistent with the schedule you and I recently discussed If you have further questions
or comments please do not hesitate to let me know
Best regards
Tom Furlong Mayor
City of Chanhassen
952 238 1315 phone
952 474 8891 home
612 209 1152 cell
tfurlong@ci chanhassen mn us
From Oehme Paul mailto poehme@ci chanhassen mn us
Sent Tuesday November 20 20072 17 PM
To Tom Furlong
Cc Gerhardt Todd
Subject Street Improvement program
Tom
As we discussed the older neighborhoods on the north side of Lake Minnewashta are scheduled to start having
the streets reconstructed beginning in 2012 Since these neighborhoods are extensive and the project costs will
be expensive three separate projects are proposed over several years The first neighborhood proposed for
reconstruction is the Minnewashta Heights neighborhood The project area is generally from Greenbriar Ave on
the west to Dogwood Ave on the east In 2014 Cypress Drive and Dartmouth Dr areas are planned for street
replacement The neighborhoods in Washta Bay and Orchard Lane are scheduled for replacement in 2016 All
the watermain along with some of the sanitary sewer system is planned to be replaced with the projects We are
also planning to improve the drainage in the area with a new storm sewer system along with some water quality
improvements
As you are aware the Laredo Drive area is scheduled for reconstruction in 2008 In 2009 a street mill and
overlay project is scheduled for Santa Vera Drive area and other streets in the Kerber Blvd area In 2010 the
Erie Ave neighborhood south of Lake Drive and Red Cedar Point neighborhood are both scheduled for street
reconstruction In 2011 we are planning to resurface a portion of the Carver Beach area streets
The pavement management program surveys a third of the City streets each year to determine a pavement
condition number for each street segment This information is then used to rate the overall condition of the street
network and to determine street priority improvement areas Staff also reviews problem utility areas sewer
water along with drainage problems to generate a needs based area priority list The pavement condition
information along with the utility needs areas is combined to identify street priority project areas
The schedule that is planned is not fixed We may need to change the schedule of some of these projects based
on future review of pavement conditions or utility needs Implementation of the schedule and projects as
always is dependent on future funds that are made available
If you would like additional information please let me know
Sincerely
3
49
Paul Oehme P E
Director of Public Works City Engineer
City of Chanhassen
7700 Market Boulevard
P O Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
Ph 952 227 1169
From Randy Raddatz mailto randyjcoach@yahoo com
Sent Monday November 19 2007 7 54 PM
To btjornhom@ci chanhassen mn us cpeterson@ci chanhassen mn us blitsey@ci chanhassen mn us
vernst@ci chanhassen mn us tfurlong@ci chanhassen mn us
Subject Re Street improvements curb gutter in Minnewashta Heights
Dear Mayor Furlong
This e mail is intended to document my understanding that based on my conversation with you last
week the Minnewashta Heights neighborhood is scheduled for major street repairs improvements
throughout the neighborhood not more than 5 years from now
Please reply to this e mail if my understanding is incorrect
Sincerely
Randy Raddatz
p s As a citizen of Chanhassen I very much would have appreciated it if even ONE of you had
responded to my concerns I really don t think that s too much to ask of our elected officials
Original Message
From Randy Raddatz randyjcoach@yahoo com
To btj ornhom@ci chanhassen mn us cpeterson@cLchanhassen mn us blitsey@ci chanhassen mn us
vernst@ci chanhassen mn us tfurlong@cLchanhassen mn us
Sent Saturday September 8 2007 11 20 30 AM
Subject Street improvements curb gutter in Minnewashta Heights
Good morning
I would like to bring to your attention an item that appears to continue to swept under the rug so I am
hoping my e mail to you will result in some action
We moved to Chanhassen just over 7 years ago Shortly after we moved here I asked one of our
neighbors if curb gutter in our development Minnewashta Heights had ever been discussed He said
that yes it had been discussed a lot over the years and that his recollection was that Minnewashta
Heights was originally to have had major street repair curb gutter around 1983 As a result I called
City staff to see if street improvements curb gutter was on the docket for our neighborhood I was
told that it was but that we were scheduled out a few years 5 8 if recall correctly Since that original
call I have called roughly annually ever since each time I am told that
1 The City is very much aware of the poor condition of the streets in our neighborhood
4
50
2 The City does have us in queue for street improvements curb gutter
3 The City will pick up a major portion of the cost with every homeowner being assessed equally for
the remaining cost regardless of the amount of street frontage each homeowner has
4 WE WON T BE SEEING THESE IMPROVEMENTS FOR ABOUT ANOTHER 5 8 YEARS
I wholeheartedly agree with items 1 3 but how can we continue to be out 5 8 years EVERY YEAR
And if this was originally in the plan for the early 1980 s how can we now be 25 years behind
schedule
I tried sending a mass e mail to the City Council addressing this same issue a few weeks ago but
your mass e mail option didn t work so I lost my entire e mail In that e mail I explained that our
various levels of government have misplaced priorities because the role of government should be 1
Ensuring public safety and 2 Making sure that we have a well maintained system of roads and
infrastructure that will allow for safe and efficient transportation and commerce period
Unfortunately governments from cities to the federal government have decided that they should resolve
every social ill that has ever befallen us which they have proven time and time again that they CAN T
solve the result being that there is little if any money available for the REAL responsibilities of
government namely public safety and roads infrastructure Ironically and very sadly I had attempted to
send the original e mail just a few days before the Minneapolis bridge collapse
Because the City has neglected our neighborhood our streets are in terrible condition weeds grow
along the streets and eventually spread into our lawns what s left of the grass at the park in our
development is essentially weeds snowplows detroy our lawns in the winter etc Meanwhile all of us
continue to diligently pay our taxes hoping that someday the money that we donate will be used to
improve our own neighborhood
Please consider reprioritizing the spending in Chanhassen so that we can finally and hopefully within
1 2 years receive the improvements to our neighborhood that apparently were supposed to have
occurred a quarter of a century ago
I would very much appreciate a response from each of you with your thoughts
Thank you
Sincerely
Randy Raddatz
6340 Elm Tree Avenue
Yahoo oneSearch Finally mobile search that gives answers not web links
Never miss a thing Make Yahoo your homepage
Get easy one click access to your favorites Make Yahoo your homepage
5
51
C l 9 l Oll V o C n CIl Y CIl Vl n r III III lU
r CIl n c V 5 Oll OJ OJ iii o
o
N
CIl
0 CT
CT
CIl
OJ
l
iiJ l n CIl
5
Vi
Oll
n
0
o
0
CIl
0 CIl
CIl 0
CT
6 o n
CIl l OJ
n
l
o
n
V
CIl
r
0 0 CIl OJ 0 l AlVl CIl
OJ
n
3
g
CIl
V
OJ V
C
Vl
n d o
m
l AI
Vl
CIl
OJ
n
3
g
CIl
V
OJ V
2
Vl
n 0
m
l AlVl CIl
OJ
n
3
g
CIl
V
OJ V
C
Vl
n 0
m
l AlVl CIl
OJ
n
3
g
CIl
V
OJ V
C
Vl
n 0
m
l n
n
o
0
l
l
V
V
i
0
c
CIl
0 l
0 OJ o V CIl CIl
n
n
o
0
l
l
V
V
i
0
c
CIl
0 l
0 OJ o V CIl CIl
l
Vl
I
I
0
C
C
l ao
V
0 r 00 C l
g J o o l tl III
C O
t
OJ 0 0
m l
CT
rD
E OJ
0
r CIl
CIl
0
3
2 l
l
3 3 o
OJ
c
V OJ CIl
o
l
0
E
C
l
l
3
CIl
CT
r
CIl
CIl t t
S
P
0
CIl 0
o
0 0
CIl
2 CIl n
3
CIl
OJ
l
l
o
CIl
OJ
l
V
OJ
V
l
CIl
n
V
CIl g 0
0
OJ
0
3
n
C
OJ
o
0
V
C
0
V
l
OJ
CIl
n
V
CIl
V
0
3
CIl
0
CIl
Q S
0
3
0
9
OJ CT l 0
rCll CIl
r
n
OJ g
E
0 r l
C C l 0 Y
Vi 0 OJ 0 0 CT
n
c
OJ
o
0
V
C
0
V
l
OJ
CIl
Q
j 0
3
CIl
0
CIl
V
CIl
o co
3
o
OJ
0
C
l
OJ
c OJ 5 D
l
r
o
rOJ
Y
CIl
2 n
E
0 l
r C
o
E 0
g
c
CIl
c
V
CT
i
CIl
CIl
OJ
CIl
V V
n
CIl
o
V
V
V CIl
Y
0 OJ V 0 OJ 0 o l CIl OJ V 0 OJ
3 OJ l CIl l OJ l n CIl OJ
0
n
0 c
iii
l
Y
0 3 OJ
CIl Vl
8 OJ 5 Oll OJ CIl 0 OJ
OJ l 0
Vi 0 OJ 0 O
0
CIl n o l V c n 0 l 0
0
o roo
Q
n
V CIl CIl
CIl 0 OJ V CIl 0 iiJ n CIl 3 CIl l OJ CIl
8
g
CT
E
S
CIl
CT
0
rCll rC
Q
OJ
OJ
CIl
V
OJ 0 o
CIl
5 5
o
Oll 0
b
a 0 0
S
iii V
r CIl
n OJ V CIl V OJ l V OJ l OJ OJ l 0 o CIl iiJ OJ l 0 V CIl OJ n r OJ Oll CIl V OJ CIl l X CIl 0 l o
l
C
r CIl V CIl
AI CIl 0 iiJ n CIl 3 CIl l CIl 0 OJ l 0
n
OJ r
OJ
CIl OJ
V
OJ
OJ
l 0
CIl
V
CIl 0
C CIl
l
Y
o
l
C
r CIl V CIl
AI CIl S OJ n CIl 3 CIl l CIl 0 CIl c C CIl 0 OJ V 0 OJ n C CT OJ l 0 Oll C CIl
OJ
OJ V
CIl
V CIl
OJ OJ
3
l
CIl
0
l
V CIl
V
C CIl Y
OQ o V V OJ CIl OJ OQ o V V OJ CIl OJ
0 Q C n C CIl l V OJ CIl V
r OJ CIl n o l n CIl CIl n C CT OJ l 0 Oll C CIl
UJ
OJ
CIl
0
V
8
Xl
l
V
CIl
0
C
J ro
0 l
CIl
o
l
OJ
0
l
V
0
V
r
CIl
OJ
CIl
CIl
n
VJ
m
g
0
OJ
0 OJ V
0 o 0 CIl o E l CIl V OJ V C l
V CIl
l
V
CIl E
0
n 0
o
l V r i
CIl
C
CT CIl
0
iil
l Vi
CIl 0
g
V
0
V
CIl
0
CIl
l
V
CIl
V
CIl
3
E
CIl
o
n
l
0
0
vr
E
0
l CIl
r CIl
C
V
CT
0
CIl
l
2
Vi
l
CIl 0 OOll
OJn
c o
CIl ig
Q
I
e
c
VI
5
Vl
2
0
OJ
50
o
0
5 3
CIl
OJ
3a
m
v
3
ffi
CIl
0
l
V
V
E
0
OJ
CIl
CIl rC
0
CIl
CIl
OJ V
3 0 o CIl 3 CIl l V r OJ 3 OJ CT CIl
0
Z
CIl
OJ
0
8
1
r
l
0
OJ
t OJ
CIl
C
V
V
n
V CIl
0
CIl
0
l
C
0
l ro
o
V
m n r
Vi
o
OJ
l
3
CD
n
n
g
lOCllV CIlO
O
c
Co g
CIl
iiJ
o
rD
Y
CD
iii
I
CIl
OJ
iii
0
S
ii
rD
c
OJ
0
QJ
c
r1
Vi
CIl
OJ
o
t
Vi
c
c
0
l
V
CIl
CT CIl
3 CIl r o 0 V 0 CIl 0 CIl l 9 l Oll
Gl CIl l CIl OJ 0 o
0 CIl c c OJ ro l
n
CT
o l
C
q
3 5
CIl
0
n
C
C
V V CTc OJ l
iil
0
n
Oll
CIl
C
E
CIl
r 0
OJ
C
CIl
OQ o V V
Gl CIl l CIl OJ C V CIl OJ
8 Vi
ffi o
l
CIl
Oll
l
o
iii
Oll OJ 1 o
V CIl CIl V n c CIl l
g J 0 o 3 i OQ o l
OJ
CIl
V
OJ
V CIl 3 CIl l
z o OJ 0 0 CIl V V CIl 0
V
C
V CIl
C
V V
CIl
3
OJ
CIl l
CIl V
N
V
V
o
0
3
l
CIl
CIl
iiJ it @ Vi OJ CIl
V 0 CIl OJ 0 o CIl z o OJ 0 0 CIl V V CIl 0
E
0
g
OJ
OJ o
E
E
Vl l
Q
S
OJ
c
CIl
0
l
3 g
S
Q
l
E
r
CIl
CIl
V
0
V
I
CIl
Q
3
o
CIl l
Vi V 0 CIl OJ 0 o CIl
o o OJ Oll CIl 3 CIl r o q
o n o l l CIl n 0 l n r OJ Oll CIl V o
0
CIl
CIl
CIl 0 rCT OJ l
OJ
I
l Vlo
o
OJ
iii CIl
CIl V V CIl
o 3
AI o 3 OJ CT CIl V C CT ro n
V
0
OJ
C
g J
V
OOJ
Xl v
00
CTV
I
o
CIl
o
N l
OJ
CIl
OJ
b
OJ
CJr
O
V
0
CIl
I
CIl
CIl
r
V
OJ
o
ro
ii
2
OJ l
o
Y
I
OJ
D
0
J
N
8
I
g
oOJ
V
Vl 0 CIl OJ 0 o CIl z o OJ 0 0 CIl V V CIl 0 o
0
ii
2 06
I
OJ 0 0
CIl
l
OJ
C
Y
l 0 Y Vl 0 CIl OJ 0 V r r
CIl n o
CT CIl
o
OJ CIl
r
V
CIl
V
n
201 Glg o
n
l
l 00
3
OJ
r
3
0
o
g
0
l
l
CIl
0
0
ro
l
0
3
Q
CIl
0
l
0 rc
v
CIl
0 E r
C1l Vl
r OJ 0 OJ 0 o C o Gl CIl l CIl
OJ
0
CIl OJ
r
E
CIl 0 r 3
g CIl
c
CIl
CIl
3
V
OJ
5
5
r
l
r
Oll
CIl
0 tl r OJ CIl c C CIl n 20 Gl
0 n OJ CIl 0 OJ 3 o l Oll r CIl C l V
V
CIl n o
CIl
l
CIl
V
V l
C
0
l
CIl
0
d5
l
a
5
ro
0
0
r CIl
to
r
OJ
CIl
V
n
CIl
o
0 0
Vi OJ V
CIl OJ
V V
0
CIl
l
0
CIl
0
OJ a
Oll
0
Vl
CIl
CIl
0
l
3
0 60
0
2
a
l
ga6 ECD
o
U1
5
J
r
CIl
g
l
OJ
0 OJ
CIl
Y
0
l
0 3
OJ
n
3
0
o C J
i C
V V
CIl OJ l rOll CIl
ro
l
0 CTOJ CIl
n f
Vl 0 CIl E OJ V C V CIl OJ 3 C V CIl 0 o l
o r CIl n o V o V C
0
iil
l r
l
r
qtl
CIl
o
0
J o
tl
OJ CIl CIl c C OJ
V
0 0
CIl
0 CIl
o o
E
Vi
2
n
l
o
I lJ1
0
0
CIl
iii
g
CIl
V ii
r CIl
l Q C 0 5 Oll V
V
r
c
OJ x
iil
CIl
CT
n
Y
CIl
5
OJ
Oll
OJ
CIl n o 0 c V CIl 0 o l 0 o OJ CIl CIl c c OJ
Vl CIl CIl V l o 1 @ CT ro 0
lJ1 o
CIl
ffi
8
0
0
l
CIl
OJ
0
l
0
3 mO
o
n
3
vr
iil
g
g
@
en
0
3
3 CIl
o
l
l
J
5 Oll
OJ
Oll
l
CIl
0
iil @
CIl V
0
OJ
0
OJ
J 5 CT CIl
OJ 3 c V CIl 0 o l a o OJ
Vl
OJ
OJ l 0
CIl
N
a N
3
lJ1 E
iiJ l ro c rV CIl
ffi
CIl c c OJ
0
0
OJVl
OJ
l
C ii80 g
3
V
C
CIl
CIl
vr g
i1
CD
CD
OJ
8
g
5
l
E
r
r
iii
J
OJ
lJ1 O OJ
o
S
0
lJ1 r
o
CIl
0
o
iiJ
3 lOll
n
0
CIl
o
l
V
C
CIl
r g
CD
0
3
CD
S
OJ
CIl
J
l l
CIl
Oll
I o o Vl C CT V CIl c C CIl l CIl n o l
iil
n03
3
0
CIl
3
g
1
0
iiJ
C
0
l
ii
Vi
0
0
OJ
C
C
l
V
0
V
Y
CIl
CIlVl V
l
0
OJ
VlO
OJ l
g
0
CIl
OJ
N
OJ
D
I
a
o
OJ CIl CIl c C OJ
l iii
0
n
Vl
CIl
o
0
0
l V
CIl
t
OJ
0
C
0
l
0
i
0
ii
0
l
S
1
63 0
CIl
o
CIl
g
Y
0 Vi
Vl OJ l 0 N iil 3
V V m V V S
n
m
j
Z l
0
J
N
n
or
I
oV
Z
c
I
a
V
m
V m aZ m V c j V
52
z
s
s
c
m
m
0
a
a
VI
S
III
C
S
ID
r
C
III
tI
ID
ii
S
tI
III
0
III
III
0 0
iii
III
a
II
0
s
z
Vl
n
G
Vl
n
1 1
a
III
0
0
r
s
CD
III
III
3
0
1 1
III
Z
0
0
D
0
0
CD
N
CD
iii
CD
0
CD
CD
c
m
0
CD
Vl
5
0
N
0
0
tn
0
III
r
0
r
r
0
0
0
a
0
0
3
3
CD
0
W
CD
CD
c
3
0
0
D
III
1 1
g
c
0
CD
III
0
III
3
CD
3
D
ro
ro
0
0
l
CD
a
CJ I
CD
l
0
III
0
III
r
0
N
a
0
r0
o
CD
r
lJ
c
l
a
0
l
0
l
0
III
a
0
r
CD
tn
V1
CD
III
r
CD
N
2
x
s
s
5
l
r
CD
r
0
0
0
CD
iii
CD
3
1 1
0
CD
0
CD
l
CD
Q
r
CD
0
l
Otl
r
b
CD
CD
0
0
0
r
CD
III
l
CD
r
r
Q
CD
r
CD
0
0
1 1
0
0
P
l
CD
0
a
CD
0
III
l
iii
l
CD
c
1
0
m
0
r
l
1
Vl
III
7
CD
CD
0
5
0
a
Z
l
CD
V1
III
III
l
CD
CD
CJ I
Q
III
CD
Otl
III
Otl
III
0
III
b
0
0
l
0
s
l
0
0
Vl
tn
III
0
0
r
3
Vl
r
CD
0
tn
r
in
l
CD
CD
III
V1
1 0
0
9
III
0
0
iii
0
0
r
2
l
W
V1
In
l
0
3
III
0
CD
0
CD
CD
V1
Q
l
0
0
in
c
r
r
l
0
0
CD
l
CD
a
r
0
r
Otl
0
CD
3
0
0
c
CD
III
0
iii
1 0
0
r
a
l
l
III
0
3
l2O
a
l
0
9
l
n
a
CD
0
0
r
0
0
r
x
3
0
0
CD
CD
o
Otl
E
Vl
r
l
l20
0
b
0
0
r
CD
CD
CD
l
0
o
r
III
3
CD
CD
CD
III
V1
l
Otl
CD
III
n
l
ff
G
z
0
r
Vl
l
r
r
0
c
CJ I
V1
tn
n
CD
0
0
CD
CD
0
III
0
CD
CD
0
l
0
c
l20
a
0
CD
CD
CD
CD
E
Vl
n
1 1
z
Vl
n
1 1
N
z
tn
s
1 0
0
CD
0
1 0
0
CD
0
0
0
tn
1 0
3
1 0
3
CD
r
0
en
c
III
en
a
0
III
CD
0
3
3
D
0
CD
0
CD
l
l
CD
0
r
0
n
CD
III
0
r
s
s
iii
iii
CD
3
r
CD
r
CD
r
s
P
CD
I
0
Vl
lJl
tn
120
a
r
V1
TI
l
TI
N
r
0
0
III
III
III
tv
Cil
3
N
3
1l
w
w
0
0
g
CD
0
r
r
s
l
l
l20
0
0
Vl
Z
CD
E
Vl
n
III
III
r
0
z
1 1
1 0
0
X
W
III
0
r
0
r
0
CD
CD
g
in
III
l
en
0
3
III
E
0
r
CD
III
t
CD
CD
0
CD
iii
0
CD
0
l
E
9
0
x
0
III
0
Otl
0
3
3
CD
l
CD
CD
CD
3
l
CD
0
3
3
l
CD
0
III
CD
CD
III
l
a
0
E
CD
CD
III
III
P
l
0
l
0
CD
CD
l
r
CD
l
CD
CD
0
3
a
CD
P
0
III
III
1
EVl
Vl
O
III
0
l
Vl
r
a
CD
CD
III
N
0
0
CD
Z
0
3
en
III
W
V1
0
l
X
0
0
0
CJ I
Otl
b
r
CD
0
in
D
0
CD
CD
0
9
0
3
r
t
CD
n
0
9
l Otl
S
III
ro
CD
fl
Vl
Z
Z
l
n
tn
1 0
0
CD
r
CD
III
0
0
0
l
2
3
3
0
III
a
III
III
III
0
CD
3
l
0
r
CD
III
CD
CD
III
r
l
0
5
0
0
a
0
ro
III
III
CD
CD
r
a
III
P
o
0
b
0
r
1l
r
CD
CD
0
2
W
0
1 1
r
0
CD
0
0
I
1l
CD
I
c
0
N
m
CD
c
I
l
l
W
I
0
n
m
j
z
z
CD
tn
Vl
n
tn
Z
0
0
x
CD
W
III
III
I
in
E
l
en
3
tI
0
III
III
t
CD
CD
0
r
CD
l
E
9
0
III
0
n
Otl
0
N
r
CD
CD
CD
3
l
n
t
3
tn
l
0
CD
1 10
CD
CD
III
CD
0
l
E
0
III
0
P
P
l
CD
CD
I
z
CD
Vl
EVl
0
c
t
r
N
CD
III
0
r
W
I
V1
III
CJ I
Otl
I
CJ I
O
0
0
CD
m
m
0
CD
Z
0
tI m I
z
z
z
V1
tn
c
0
0
0
0
III
j
3
III
III
III
CD
I
III
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
III
P
o
P
CD
z
n
1 1
c
tn
CD
0
0
CD
t
III
0
3
3
0
CD
c
l
III
3
CD
CD
CD
CD
l
III
a
CD
r
r
0
iii
l
0
III
CD
III
P
o
P
ili
0
Vl
III
Vl
CD
D D
0
0
00 g
r l
CD CD
z
0
tn
Z
III
tn
0
0
CD
0
III
5
III
0
0
0
CD
0
III
3
0
@
CD
CD
CD
l
l
0
l
III
0
3
I
CD
0
tn
III
CD
l
CD
CD
E
CD
0
a
CD
CD
a
a
III
CD
III
r
0
III
0
0
0
III
0
III
0
CD
0
0
CD
l
CD
CD
E
0
P
CD
0
l
0
0
C
c
l
III
III
r
III
0
CD
r
0
CD
r
0
CD
0
0
0
0
0
0
CD
3
l
r
r l
CD
0
CD CD
P
l
Z
tn
TI
Otl
l
3
b
III
0
0
CD
CD
r
0
r
CD
0
l
3
3
06
in
0
3
CD
III
tn
l
CD
r
CD
0
CD
III
0
Otl
III
CD
b
III
CD
0
CD
1l
3
a
CD
CD
0
CD
0
0
J
0
CD
l
r
CD
l
CD
Otl
0
c
l
r
n
0
c
III
CD
P
o
CD
ro
CD
III
l
0
CD
CD
CD
1
r
III
tn
CD
r
3
r
5
III
r
III
l
CD
l
Otl
E
CD
c
1l
III
0
l
j
CD
l
CD
0
b
a
m
06
Otl
l
3
r
r
III
r
l
l
III
r
0
CD
a
a
0
a
l
CD VI
VI
VI
VI
53
n o s QJ C ii E o o 0 2 o o Cll Cll 3 J Cll 0 0 0 Q J 00 r Cll c J QJ Cll 0 J VI QJ J 0 3 c a C s J 00 0 n
n
J C
0
o
tp
C Cll
0 0
roO V
J C QJ 2 o
J r Cll C o roo o QJ Cll QJ E r r o J QJ 00 Cll 00 Cll QJ Cll r QJ
Cll
l
V
00
0
o
Cll Dr
E o c c 0 Cll QJ V V Cll V V Cll 0
J
0 C J 0 QJ V Cll 0 o J r Vi o QJ n c iii 0 J QJ V V c 3 Cll N o o p o o J QJ 00 Cll X 1 0 VI II o to o QJ o Cll V 0 0 Cll 0 0 o W O l Cll 0 C QJ v N i n 0 C J
n QJ n c iii Cll 0 0 QJ J 00 r Cll 3 5
QJ 0 J 00 E r c t
o QJ Cll QJ QJ 0 E Cll 0
3 r QJ Cll 0 Cll Cll J o o 3 C
e
ii
V C
Cll
3
0
Cll
0
Cll
00
So
o pg 0
V q
E
rn
0
C
r QJ
0
to
ro
V
0
q Cll Cll QJ J 0 1 0 VI p 0 Cll C r 5 J c 0 Cll V W o p o A J o r Cll N o 2 J 00 0 Vi 0 I r Vi Cll 0 C QJ v QJ C C o 3 QJ Cll o W
0
O l QJ o Cll V
2 o o
E r
g
0
VJ
r
QJ
Cll
V
V
Vi
V1
VI
0
ffi
5
0
0
Cll
C
0
0
QJ
0
0
VJ
roo
V1
Q l
n
rt
0
V C
C
iii
J
J
r
0
C J
o
QJ
N
V
o
V Cll 3 Cll J r
ri
E
o
C
OJ
III
o o J
V
C
Cll
QJ
E Cll
2
0
o
0 V r
C 2 Cll o o 0 Cll Cll 0 iii V Cll QJ 3 l
J
r
0 J
3 ciQ r 0 Cll C C o J r o 0 0 C Cll r Cll iii o o 0 Cll Cll 0 C 3 Cll J QJ 0 iii o
TI
Cll
5
o r Cll J Cll E
V V Cll V V N VI o r Cll V Cll Cll V o 3 V V Cll V V N VI o
V Cll E
r
Cll
Cll
o o V r V Cll Cll V o 3
J Cll
V
E E QJ
0
Cll
0
3 QJ
0
J V
r
Cll
Cll
2
0
0 Cll V
0
c
C QJ 0 0 iii V Cll E Cll QJ V V Cll V V Cll 0
Cll
QJ QJ
c
C QJ 0 0 iii
J
iii
S QJ rv Cll
V
VI
Cll V
o 3
0
VI
0
Cll
C
E Cll C
J rCll E
QJ
E
V
QJ
V Cll
Cll
0
v
QJ
QJ
V
J
Cll
iJ
0 o J QJ
1 VI
QJ V V Cll V V Cll 0 QJ
A J Cll C iii o Cll 3 Cll J o o V V QJ Cll J o A J Cll C iii o Cll 3 Cll J o o V V QJ Cll J o
V V Cll V V N VI o
V Cll E
r
Cll
Cll
V Cll
0
E
0
Cll
V r
r QJ 00 Cll C J V o 3
V Cll Cll V o 3
Vi C QJ 0 0
Vi l
QJ rv Cll o
V
J
V 3
o
tri
ro
J
J o Cll
QJ
Vi
ro
O
o OJ VI o R o o R 2 o QJ V V Cll V V Cll 0 VI 00 o
0 J Cll E o r Cll Vi Cll
C 0 QJ C V Cll r o J 0 o
Cll QJ 00 Cll o J 0 o QJ 00 1 1 VI
IlJ o III III 3 o C J QJ J J C QJ
2 o QJ V V Cll V V Cll 0
V V Cll V V Cll 0 W VI C QJ 0 0 E r C t C J 0
2 o QJ V V Cll V V Cll
C QJ 0 0 E r C C J 0
o o R
C QJ 0 0 E r C C J 0 J QJ 0 0 E r C C J 0
QJ V
0
V
0
ffi V 3 Cll
J
J
Cll
r
E o r Cll Vi Cll J o
C QJ 0 0 E r C 2 J 0 Cll o o J 3 120 o Cll iii s
s oo
7
ro
QJ
TI
3
QJ 3
o
c J
I 0 o 1 VI
J 3 o c r
VI VI a o o iii CD J l QJ Cll 0
0
OJ
o
Cll J
o h OJ o
J
2
00
QJ
C 00 C
o
Cll
ro
roO
o
V
o
QJ
V
Cll V V Cll 0
C o roo o o o V o o 2 o QJ V V Cll III III Cll 0 C C J 0 o o R
2
c
0
J
QJ V III Cll III III Cll 0 c QJ
OJ
III
Cll
III
J
ffi
Cll
III
l e
0
J 000 s
8
QJ
Cll a
c
Cll
QJ
III Vi C Cll III Cll J
o
V
l
o
Cll
r
E
Cll
0
QJ
Cll
III
g
ti 0
10
0
3 QJ E
0
QJ
0
III
Q
r t
0
v
0
J
0
3
QJ
0 Cll
O
OQJo
g
g
Cll
Vi
5
o
QJ
Cll
JQJ J
e
Vi
Cll
III
5
o r
ffi
QJ
0
0
0
0
0
Cll
0
c
o
QJ RIO
g
III III Cll III III Cll 0 C Cll V Cll Cll
C
Cll
QJ
J
J ro
O
Clloo
QJ
C
III
0
ii
Cll
10
o J QJ
j
i
Vi
o
0
J
0 III
0 S o
o o J qQ
N o J Cll 0 C III Cll o C QJ o
1 VI
6 0
0
Cll
0
QJ
Cll
0
III
QJ
J QJ
III
Cll
III
V
Cll
V
0
Cll
QJ
l
0
r
Cll
0
Cll
J
Cll
0
Cll
o
l to
OJ
J III
0 0
J
0
00
r
r
Cll
Cll
0
o
0
o
III
J o
0
ro Cll o C 0 OQJO
CllIll J1Il
OJ Q
r
c
mIllC
OO
C
0
0
QJ
0
e
Oii
Cllg
Cll
J
J
@
Cll
o
r
V
o O
o
0
c
C
J
g
ro
g
0
IIl j
3
Cll
0
0
Cll
00
3
0
iif J
E
QJ
J
J
il
o
Cll
VI
Q
g
III C Cll o iii
E
0 ro o
0 Cll 0 J
o
QJ
20
g
J
0
00 QJ
0
J
QJ
o
Cll
0
0
c J o C Cll 0 C III Cll X Vi
III
r
Cll
Cll
C iii
Cll
o
0 r
E r o o J o Cll D
E r Cll Cll o C 0 QJ J 0 00 C Cll
o
0
o
QJ
C
III
o
ffi
O
E
Cll
r Cll
Cll QJ
Cll
III o
r
5l
Cll
5
0 C
C
Cll r
Cll
o C 0 QJ J 0 00 C Cll
O
C
0 3 C
C
o
QJ
t t
ri
Cll g
3
Q lQ
c
J
J
o
C
a
J
Cll
Cll
QJ
g
c
VJ
J
Cll
ii
J
0
Jl 0 VI C Cll
III r
roO
QJ
III
O Cll
0
3
Cll
QJ
0
0
0
Cll o
N
J
0
III
0
V V m V V 3 m Z I C o
N cn CV c 0 m 0 m V c V
n j o TI n I Z I V V m Z
54
CHANHASSEN
CITY
COUNCIL
WORK
SESSION JANUARY
25
2010
The City Council and
staff
members toured
the new public works
facility from 5
30
to 6
30
p
m
The Construction
Manager
Gerhardt
Lee
with RJM
Construction
and
Thomas
Stromsodt with
Oertel
Architects
were
available to
answer
questions
Mayor Furlong called the work session to order at 6 30 p m COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT Mayor Furlong Councilman Litsey Councilwoman Ernst and Councilman McDonald COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT Councilwoman Tjornhom STAFF PRESENT Todd Gerhardt Laurie Hokkanen Paul Oehme and Todd Hoffman REVIEW LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES Todd Gerhardt provided updates on the Highway 101 Corridor Project from Lyman Boulevard to the Scott County Line Highway 5 project improvements west of Highway 41 and continued development of Highway 212 Mayor Furlong asked if there was anything that could be done to encourage action on environmental issues Todd Gerhardt explained that the permitting processes are too time consuming and costly Councilman McDonald noted that most environmental issues are federally regulated with too many layers of bureaucracy Todd Gerhardt discussed some of the items listed under unfunded mandates such as bridge inspections and water testing and that there has been discussion about the eminent domain law being changed this year Councilwoman Ernst stated she liked the sentence The people who know what is best for this city are the people who live here under Local Controls Todd Gerhardt explained the need to support the Opt Out for cities and suburban transit agencies because of a real risk of losing Southwest Metro Transit Councilman Litsey provided an update on the transit summit he attended Mayor Furlong discussed his recent appointment as Chairman of the Suburban Transit Association He suggested staff add the need for further control and financial resources under the paragraph Keep Opt Out Suburban Transit Agencies in Place Todd Gerhardt encouraged council members to voice support to state legislators on the need to require verification of citizenship for newly registered voters and requiring registered voters to provide a photo ID at the polls Mayor Furlong adjourned the work session at 6 50 p m Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim
55
CHANHASSEN
CITY
COUNCIL
REGULAR
MEETING SUMMARY
MINUTES
JANUARY
25 2010
Mayor Furlong
called the
meeting
to order
at 7
10 p m The
meeting
was opened
with
the
Pledge
to the
Flag
COUNCIL
MEMBERS PRESENT
Mayor Furlong Councilman
Litsey
Councilwoman Ernst and Councilman
McDonald COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSENT
Councilwoman
Tjornhom
STAFF PRESENT
Todd
Gerhardt
Roger
Knutson Laurie
Hokkanen Paul Oehme and Todd Hoffman PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS Mayor Furlong read an invitation to the City s February th Festival being held on Saturday February 6 at Lake Ann Park and outlined the schedule of events CONSENT AGENDA Councilwoman Ernst moved Councilman Litsey seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager s recommendations a Approval of Minutes City Council Work Session Minutes dated January 11 2010 City Council Verbatim and Summary Minutes dated January 11 2010 Resolution 2010 05 b Well No 14 Project 10 03 Award Construction Contract Resolution 2010 06 c Audubon Road Reconstruction Project 10 03 Accept Feasibility Report Call Public Hearing rd Resolution 2010 07 d Frontier 3 Addition Accept Streets and Utilities Resolution 2010 08 f Resolution Approving List for 2010 State Bonding Projects All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0 VISITOR PRESENTATIONS PRESENTATION OF EAGLE SCOUT PROJECT CONSTRUCTION OF WOOD DUCK NESTING BOXES STAN ROJINA TROOP 347 Stan Rojina outlined the process of planning and constructing 10 wood duck nesting boxes which he donated to the City of Chanhassen
56
City
Council
Summary
January 25
2010 PRESENTATION
OF PARK AND
RECREATION
SERVICE AWARD
TO
JUGGBROS
Mayor
Furlong presented
the
Park
and
Recreation Service
Award
to
Brett
and Blake Szalapski
for
their
volunteer
work in
teaching
kids
to
juggle and
entertaining
crowds
at
the Summer
th
Discovery
Playground
Program the
Penny
Carnival
the 4 of July celebration and the Senior Center Picnic Brett and Blake Szalapski gave a brief demonstration of their juggling skills LAW ENFORCEMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT UPDATE Lt Jim Olson provided year end numbers through the end of December noting a 55 2 clearance rate for December He provided information on the sheriff department s facebook page and reminded people to slow down when driving in winter weather conditions Chief Roger Smallback provided information on the fire department s calls to date and year end numbers for 2009 2010 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 10 01 PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDER AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ERIE AVENUE AREA Public Present Name Address Jaci Parsons and Ryan Benson 8101 Dakota Lane Jessica Boevers 8113 Erie Circle Rick Uglum 8016 Erie Avenue Jon Kathe Held 8114 Erie Circle Robert Lund 8023 Erie Avenue Kathie Nelson 8025 Erie Avenue Connie Hatton 8018 Erie Avenue Mel Lenander 8103 Dakota Lane John Cherico 8054 Erie Spur Roger Jeanette Schultz 8041 Erie Avenue Paul Oehme provided background information on this project before introducing Kevin Kawlewski with WSB and Associates who gave a presentation on the scope of the project Councilman McDonald asked how the City balances continually fixing utility breaks and roads versus reconstructing Councilwoman Ernst asked what has been done to conserve money on the project Mayor Furlong opened the public hearing Jeanette Schultz 8041 Erie Avenue asked if the City was aware of the underground springs in the area asked if the boulevard trees were staying or being removed and how much of her concrete driveway will be removed during construction 2
57
City
Council
Summary
January
25 2010
Rick
Uglum
8016
Erie Avenue
asked
for
clarification
of the
assessment
methodology
per
lot versus
front
frontage
When
asked by
Mayor
Furlong
his
opinion on
the
need
for
the project
he
agreed
the
street was
in
bad
shape in
front of
where he
lives
Jeanette
Schultz
agreed that it s high time the street gets fixed Connie Hatton 8018 Erie Avenue agreed that the street is not in very good shape She asked for clarification of the assessments cost for tree removal and if the pavement will be strong enough to handle heavy trucks i e garbage and Schwann s John Cherico 8054 Erie Spur asked for clarification on the amount of yard being torn up and replaced street lamps being removed and replaced and clarification that if the bids come in below the estimate the assessment amount will decrease He commented that the roads are in need of repair Mel Lenander 8103 Dakota Lane asked what will happen to the stormwater drain located on the north side of his property He stated he voted against the project the last time it was proposed but thinks now it s probably needed Jessica Boevers 8113 Erie Circle stated she believed Erie Avenue was in need of the project but with a PCI score of 64 asked why Erie Circle is included She also asked if the City has explored contracting with one garbage hauler Jon Held 8114 Erie Circle stated he was 85 90 percent for the project He asked for clarification of how the assessment interest rates were calculated and replacement of existing landscaping Councilwoman Ernst moved Councilman McDonald seconded to close the public hearing All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0 The public hearing was closed Councilwoman Ernst asked if there were any concerns raised at the neighborhood meetings that were not brought up in the public hearing Mayor Furlong asked staff to clarify the need for Erie Circle to be included in the project at this time After comments from council members the following motion was made Resolution 2010 09 Councilman Litsey moved Councilman McDonald seconded that the City Council order the preparation of plans and specifications for the 2010 Street Reconstruction Project 10 01A Erie Avenue neighborhood All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0 COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS Councilwoman Ernst thanked city staff for keeping the roads safe during the last winter storm ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS Todd Gerhardt discussed one of the City s Key Financial Strategies is working cooperatively with other communities in Carver County and how the City of Chanhassen is spearheading a joint powers agreement for sealcoating 3
58
City
Council
Summary
January 25 2010 CORRESPONDENCE
DISCUSSION
None
Councilwoman
Ernst moved
Councilman
Litsey
seconded
to
adjourn
the meeting All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0 The City Council meeting was adjourned at 9 00 p m Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim 4
59
CHANHASSEN
CITY
COUNCIL
REGULAR
MEETING JANUARY
25
2010 Mayor
Furlong
called the meeting
to
order at
7
10 p m The
meeting
was
opened with
the
Pledge
to the Flag COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT
Mayor
Furlong
Councilman Litsey
Councilwoman
Ernst
and Councilman McDonald COUNCIL
MEMBERS
ABSENT
Councilwoman
Tjornhom STAFF PRESENT
Todd
Gerhardt
Roger
Knutson
Laurie Hokkanen Paul Oehme and Todd Hoffman PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS Mayor Furlong Thank you and welcome and we appreciate your patience as we start a little bit late here We had our work session off site at our new public works facility Just took us a little bit of time to get back here to city hall At this time I would ask members of the council if there are any changes or modifications to the agenda Otherwise without objection we ll proceed with the agenda as published We d like to start now with a couple public announcements I m going to take things a little bit out of order here for public announcements just to save the up and down We ll start with the invitation to February Festival The City of Chanhassen is proud to th announce our winter event which is a 17 annual February Festival This is the first of a year long series of special events that are sponsored by the City in cooperation with our local th businesses February Festival will be held on Saturday February 6 At this time I d like to invite all residents their families and friends to join me and my family out on Lake Ann for ice fishing and a variety of other activities The event will begin at noon and includes skating sledding hayrides bonfires to warm you up and 3 000 in various door prizes Hot food and concessions will be sold on the ice by Chanhassen Rotary and Culver s as well as the Boy Scout Troop 330 will be selling their s mores kits again Ice fishing contest will run from 1 00 to 3 00 p m including 6 000 of prizes this year The Friends of the Chanhassen Library are also offering bingo on the ice and are sponsoring their medallion hunt again this year in the city That st medallion hunt will begin on January 31 The person who finds the medallion will receive a prize of 750 Each Feb Fest attendee will receive one free door prize ticket to the event and you should be present to win Must be present to win Ice fishing tickets are 10 for all ages It is a fun event The holes are pre drilled A lot of activity A lot of people out on the ice Tickets are available at City Hall the Chanhassen Rec Center and at various local businesses For more information please check on the City s web site I look forward to seeing everybody there It is th a wonderful event If you ve never been out to Feb Fest take the time that Saturday on the 6 Come out and you ll see a lot of friends and neighbors out there Have a lot of fun so I look forward to seeing a lot of people out there this year Let s move on now We ll pick up item D with Visitor Presentations if that s okay with everybody Let s move onto our consent agenda
60
Chanhassen
City
Council
January
25 2010
CONSENT
AGENDA
Councilwoman
Ernst moved
Councilman Litsey
seconded
to approve
the following consent agenda items
pursuant
to the
City Manager s recommendations
a
Approval
of Minutes
City
Council
Work
Session Minutes
dated
January
11
2010 City
Council
Verbatim
and
Summary Minutes
dated
January
11
2010 Resolution
2010
05
b
Well
No 14 Project 10 03 Award Construction Contract Resolution 2010 06 c Audubon Road Reconstruction Project 10 03 Accept Feasibility Report Call Public Hearing rd Resolution 2010 07 d Frontier 3 Addition Accept Streets and Utilities Resolution 2010 08 f Resolution Approving List for 2010 State Bonding Projects All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0 VISITOR PRESENTATIONS PRESENTATION OF EAGLE SCOUT PROJECT CONSTRUCTION OF WOOD DUCK NESTING BOXES STAN ROJINA TROOP 347 Stan Rojina Good evening Mr Mayor members of the council My name is Stan Rojina from Boy Scout Troop 347 and for my Eagle project I constructed 10 of these wood duck nesting boxes With help from my troop and the wood was donated by Fullerton Lumber Company and I d like to donate them to the City of Chanhassen to go into the inventory to help with the wood duck population in the city Mayor Furlong Very good thank you How many you said you made 10 boxes Stan Rojina Ten yep Mayor Furlong About how many other scouts or other people did you have help out in the project Stan Rojina We had 10 volunteers come and go throughout the day We started at 8 00 in the morning and we finished by 3 00 so Mayor Furlong Okay good And are there why did you pick this project in particular Stan Rojina Because I m interested in wildlife As a boy scout we do a lot of outdoor activities and I thought it was a nice thing to do for the environment The wood ducks generally have a hard time finding nests sometimes so It s nice that they like man made nests like this and I think it s a good way to help out 2
61
Chanhassen
City
Council
January
25 2010
Mayor
Furlong Sounds great
And this
is
your
last
project Last
step
then
before
Eagle scout
or
do
you
have some
merit
badges
yet
Stan Rojina
I
have a couple
merit badges
They
re
almost
done so
th
Mayor
Furlong
Very good
18
birthday
coming
up
soon Stan Rojina Pretty quick Mayor Furlong Okay But I m sure you ll get it done Why don t we come down and Mr Hoffman here is with Director of Parks Maybe we can have you present to the City and we ll take a picture Stan Rojina Sure Mayor Furlong Let me go ahead at this time and invite a couple other young men in our city here Residents Brett and Blake Szalapski Did I get that correct Great thanks Come on up here with me The reason these two guys are up here tonight is we re making a presentation for our park and recreation volunteer and service awards We presented a number of them at our last meeting in January Because of scheduling conflict we wanted to present the award for Brett and Blake tonight The Chanhassen Recreation and Volunteer Awards are presented by the City of Chanhassen to recognize individuals businesses civic and school groups for their service to others in our city Chanhassen s become nationally known as a great place to live and raise a family and such a reputation is only possible through the efforts of many people and groups such as those that we recognized at our earlier meeting and these guys right here These awards are designed not only to recognize achievement but also to let others know about some of the great activities that are going on in our city and to encourage them to get involved where they can For the resident group nominees it was the JuggBros Brett and Blake here who were the award recipients The JuggBros are main focus is teaching kids how to juggle and entertain crowds of people During the past year the JuggBros voluntarily taught classes for children and performed th at the Summer Discovery Program playground program the Penny Carnival the 4 of July celebration and the Senior Center Picnic Their performances have been enjoyed by a large number of residents and staff and the city appreciates and appreciates the ability of local performers to provide these recreation programs Brett and Blake on behalf of the City thank you for the volunteer service and for helping Chanhassen be such a great place to live and raise a family Congratulations Did you want to demonstrate real quick As long as I m not involved absolutely Todd Gerhardt I think we ve got some future mayor and council members there They know how to juggle things Mayor Furlong What are you implying Councilman Litsey It s a juggling act right Todd Gerhardt It is 3
62
Chanhassen
City
Council
January
25 2010
Mayor
Furlong
What
I d
like to
do
now
is continue
our
visitor
presentations
and invite
any
other
residents
or guests
to
come
forward
at this
time
to
bring
issues forward
to
the
council
This would
be
for
items
that you
want
to
discuss
that
are not on our agenda this evening If there s anybody else that would like to present this evening or talk about any issues for visitor presentations Alright Very good Thank you very much We ll move on now to our monthly updates from our law enforcement and fire departments LAW ENFORCEMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT UPDATE Mayor Furlong Good evening Lieutenant Lt Jim Olson Thank you and good evening I gave the council an end of year review middle of December last month and just to kind of give an update on that for the month of December Through the month of December Our reductions in crimes continued for the year Our non criminal did go up a little bit for the month of December 7 but was still down overall to the year and the bulk of that increase last month was in traffic stops and there was other a few miscellaneous calls that went up Open doors went up quite a bit and a couple other things but nothing real major with that at all Were there any questions at all on the end of the year or any of the numbers in the packet for this month Mayor Furlong Any questions for the Lieutenant on the numbers or the report No Okay Lt Jim Olson I also talked last month a little bit about the County making some changes in how we clear calls out to calculate our clearance rates Some of those changes have been made and we ve had a preliminary new rate for Chanhassen for 2009 that s done We ll have the final numbers next month probably the middle of the month but the early numbers show a 55 2 for clearance rate for the month of December which is around 25 higher than what we had initially had for last month so those changes are working We ll continue to tweak those a little bit but right now that s certainly having a big impact with us Beginning of January in fact over the new year s weekend we had 3 business burglaries that occurred in one of the business complexes here In the office complexes here in the city and this is a good reminder for businesses to evaluate their lock systems Evaluate alarms Security cameras and also their money deposit procedures It s always good to take a look at that every now and then and see how you re doing with that Either Beth Hoiseth the Chanhassen Crime Prevention Officer or myself will certainly come out and help you with that as well so feel free to give us a call here at City Hall The Carver County Sheriff s Office now has it s own facebook page that they can get to and with that we ll be posting safety information as well as highlighting specific laws that people may be familiar with Things like the Ted Foss Law and Passing on the Right and we ll probably even have something in there about red lights and yellow lights and how yellow doesn t mean floor it for folks coming up to intersections We re excited about this and encourage people to log on and become a fan so that they ll get regular updates Another thing we re going to do with that is we will put regular crime updates on there With crimes that we re highlighting looking for information from the public on so we ll have photos and information on different crimes that have occurred county wide as well as within the city And there will be links on the city web page initially to get to that as well We ve had a very nice stretch weather 4
63
Chanhassen
City
Council
January
25 2010
wise
For
a
couple of
weeks
it
got
warm but
it
was
starting
to feel
a
little
bit
like March
Well
winter
returned
and we
had
a
number
of accidents
this
morning
around
the county
as
well
as
a couple
here
in
the
city
and I would encourage people to slow down a little bit The streets are icy again In fact just to the west of us there are blizzard warnings out in McLeod County and Sibley County which are just on the other side of the county line so I would encourage folks again to slow down a little bit and be careful on the streets Any questions at all for the sheriff s office Mayor Furlong Any questions this evening Councilman Litsey Councilman Litsey I just want to thank you for the upgrades in the data that we re getting and look forward to receiving that information and the facebook and those kind of things to get the information out so staying on top of things and I appreciate that Lt Jim Olson Thank you councilman Okay Mayor Furlong Thank you Lt Jim Olson Thank you and have a nice evening Stay warm Mayor Furlong Chief Roger Smallback is here with the Chanhassen Fire Department Good evening Chief Chief Roger Smallback Good evening Month to date for the month of January so far we ve had 43 calls That s slightly above average Of those calls one was a fire Very minor It was a chimney fire that started to extend into some roofing material but very minor in nature We did have 2 calls that resulted in damages to businesses Those were the result of frozen sprinkler systems that burst and those happened early in January We were called once mutual aid out to Victoria for a house fire that they had Some year annual statistics For 2009 the total number of calls were 536 and that is pretty consistent with historical averages Also in January we did have a special election for an First Assistant Chief to be a one year term to fill in the vacancy when I moved up to Chief Any questions Mayor Furlong Any questions for the Chief No Again welcome I know we confirmed you at the last meeting It s nice to see you back at this meeting Chief Roger Smallback Thank you Mayor Furlong Very good thank you Move now to next item on our agenda which is will include a public hearing 2010 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 10 01 PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDER AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ERIE AVENUE AREA Public Present 5
64
Chanhassen
City
Council
January 25
2010 Name
Address
Jaci
Parsons
and Ryan
Benson
8101
Dakota
Lane Jessica
Boevers
8113
Erie
Circle Rick
Uglum
8016
Erie Avenue Jon Kathe
Held
8114
Erie
Circle Robert
Lund
8023
Erie
Avenue Kathie
Nelson
8025
Erie
Avenue Connie
Hatton
8018
Erie
Avenue Mel
Lenander
8103
Dakota
Lane
John Cherico 8054 Erie Spur Roger Jeanette Schultz 8041 Erie Avenue Mayor Furlong Let s start with a staff report please and then we ll proceed with comments from the public Paul Oehme Thank you Mayor City Council members Staff again would like to review the feasibility study for the Erie Avenue reconstruction project tonight and also hold that public hearing The streets in this area can no longer be maintained cost effectively with preventive maintenance techniques or simple overlays We also have identified several utility issues that we d also like to address in conjunction with this project Neighborhood meeting for this project th was held on November 11 to discuss the proposed project with the residents For this public hearing 71 notices have been sent out Written comments that the staff has received were included in your packet and staff did receive an additional comment from a resident that I handed out before the meeting for your review But at this time I would like to invite Kevin Kawlewski with WSB and Associates who assisted staff in drafting the feasibility study to give just a brief presentation on the scope of the project at this time so Kevin Kawlewski Thank you Paul Good evening Honorable Mayor members of Council Appreciate the opportunity to be with you again tonight Tonight we re looking at the proposed improvements for the 2010 street reconstruction project for the Erie Avenue neighborhood designated City Project 10 01A Project location essentially south of Highway 5 off Dakota Avenue It includes Erie Avenue extending west and south and Dakota wrapping around We ve got Erie Spur Dakota Lane Erie Circle and a portion of Cheyenne Avenue As Paul indicated the streets are in poor condition We do have a high number of curb line and street settlements due to poor underlying soils We ve got a high number of documented watermain breaks It s all cast iron As cast iron ages it tends to get brittle which contributes to all the breaks We have televised and reviewed tapes with the I I program We have found an extensive I I problem out here We also have underutilized storm water management facilities in the area To give you an idea of some of the street condition indices you see the numbers 20 18 41 That s the actual pavement condition index for each street project Overall for the neighborhood the average pavement condition index is 28 Per the city standards the threshold is 45 which constitutes street reconstruction In this case we re well below that that threshold What these numbers are showing you is there has been some maintenance done and you can see the high rate of deterioration following those Those improvements Looking at the utilities in the area we ve got sanitary sewer We re proposing to replace the majority or basically 6
65
Chanhassen
City
Council
January
25 2010
everything
as
far
as the
watermain
and
the
sanitary sewer
out
here
We
ve got
high
I
I
Brittle watermain
pipes
We
re
proposing to
reconstruct
the
streets
to their
current
existing
widths
and geometries
We
re
not
looking to
change
anything
The
street
construction will include sand sub grade We ll be taking out approximately 18 inches and replace it with sand section A sub grade and drain tile It s going to help us get the water away from the pavement and protect that frost heave situation Proposing to replace the existing surmountable curb with a B style curb It gives us a little better drainage characteristics Little deeper flow where it doesn t get back out into the street This is consistent with what the City s done other street reconstruction projects It s also consistent with the project that was done the Cheyenne area The Cheyenne Avenue area to the east We re proposing to replace all the cast iron watermain services and curb stops that are within the right of way Looking at complete reconstruction of the sanitary sewer system Be looking to extend the storm sewer system where it s feasible It will get the water off the street a little bit faster and direct it to the storm water management facilities that are out there that we re currently under utilizing right now Here again this shows the improvements the extent of the watermain and sanitary sewer improvements We re looking at extending from Cheyenne this area basically flows to the south There is an MCS trunk that flows under the trail to the southeast of the project area You can see it there We ll be looking at realigning some of this It s not in the center of the street as is typically the case with sanitary sewer It s usually the deepest You want it in the center where if you have to go back and reconstruct you re in the center of the right of way We ll be looking to get that back into the center right where it should be The watermain will be tearing out and replacing in it s current condition or it s current location Excuse me Street and storm sewer we re going to be tearing out the pavement Excavating to a depth of 18 inches below the current street section again with the sand We re looking at a geotextile fabric Separating our sand section from the underlying soils You see the storm sewer extension down on Erie Circle We re looking to put that in to capture storm water coming from the it s northwest and northeast and redirect that to the pond out to the east of the project site This is our typical section We re looking at 3 1 2 inches bituminous pavement 6 inches of Class V over an 18 inch select granular which is our sand Looking at a geotextile fabric again to keep the soils from migrating The purpose of the sand section and the drain tile is to get sub surface water out of our roadway Typically what happens when you get water in that top foot or so you get frost heave That s the most significant cause of damage in our pavements in Minnesota Construction itself It will have to be phased Access is limited The roads are fairly narrow We will not be we will not be disrupting all streets at one time so it s going to be staged We re going to move around the project in a methodical manner giving residents the most access as we can Open cut installations will be occurring with the sanitary sewer and the water There will be times that the project may not be accessible during the day but the specs will be set up that it will be accessible before and after normal working hours There are some significant trees in the right of way Some of these will be impacted We haven t identified them completely We don t know where all the services are If they re in the right of way and they re in the way of construction they ll have to be taken down If we can work around them we will try to do that and preserve that as much as we can There will be temporary sewer and water during construction This will have to be set up and tested in accordance with Minnesota Department of Health standards so everything will be safe and potable There won t be any issues there The City will have a construction observer on site at all times during the construction He ll be there to work with the residents notify them of upcoming schedules There ll be weekly meetings making sure that we re aware of what s going 7
66
Chanhassen
City
Council
January
25 2010
on
We
ll
have web
sites
newsletters
and
a person
on
site
that
s available
Mailboxes
will
have
to be
relocated
during
the project That will be coordinated by
the
City
That will
be
communicated
with
residents so
they
know
where
to pick
up
their
main
on
a daily basis Garbage collection will continue much as it does The City again will work with the garbage haulers to ensure that that service is not disrupted Looking at the project costs for the surface improvements which is curb and gutter and the streets we re looking at 1 011 400 For the watermain replacement 293 900 396 900 for the sanitary sewer replacement Storm sewer 244 000 That s a total project cost just over 1 9 million dollars These costs do include a 15 construction contingency 15 indirect costs The cost as presented represents the total project Not the construction Total project Everything associated with it We do not anticipate that easements will be necessary There may be one with the extension of the storm sewer down to the pond I do want to point out that all the bids that we ve received in the last year have been running 15 to 20 percent below our construction estimates based on final design so if the council decides to move forward we re going to come back with a final cost of construction That s going to be what the assessments are based on As we look at the assessments we do have 71 single family residences in the area The assessments are calculated at the City s typical practice 40 of the surface cost The surface improvements Does not include storm sewer Does not include watermain Does not include sanitary sewer related costs It is only the cost to reconstruct the road The single family residential assessment based on the feasibility costs 5 698 03 per unit Again these are proposed at a 10 year term based on a 6 interest rate Revenue sources as we look at the surface improvements the 1 011 000 40 of that through the City s assessment policy will be recovered through assessment That represents 404 560 The City street fund will cover the remaining 606 840 Storm sewer improvements will come from the storm water fund Sanitary sewer and watermain from the appropriate funds Again showing the total project cost 1 946 200 As we look at scheduling should the council decide to move forward with the preparation of plans and specs we ve got the th assessment hearing tonight on the 25 We ll be looking to bring back the final plans for your thst approval and authorization and advertise for bid March 8 Looking to open bids April 1 th Again having the award and the assessment hearing on April 26 There is a notification and advertisement period for the assessment hearing so residents can get a chance to voice in before anything else moves forward Assuming that the contract is awarded be looking to begin construction in June with having the majority of the work completed by the end of August prior to school starting again with substantial completion in October Final completion of the wear course next spring That concludes the presentation I would turn it over to questions Public input Mayor Furlong Okay thank you Any questions of Mr Kawlewski Mr McDonald Councilman McDonald I have a question and this is something that kind of bothers me on all of these Part of your presentation we talk about how bad things are The streets You know the levels that they ve gotten down to The fact that the sewers have had numbers of problems Breakage You tell us that it s cast iron It s old It s brittle and it s breaking And then I get emails from residents telling me it isn t that bad You know I can easily live with it and one of the things I guess I struggle with is how bad is it And is there some quantitative way of maybe assessing that from the standpoint of I know you can tell me how many times you go out there to fix things You know that s pretty easy Is there something you can tell me that again because 8
67
Chanhassen
City
Council
January
25 2010
of
the
history
of these
the
age
the
wear it
s
just
going
to continue
to
get
worst
and we
re
going
to
continue to
see
big
projects
because of
breakage
or
those
types of
things
How
do
I balance
all
of
this
Paul
Oehme I can try to answer that first In terms of the street condition I mean the we can go out there and keep patching potholes but I mean it s going to improve the situation and we re going to have to be out there yearly annually monthly sometimes fixing those potholes and patching the streets The curb line is sinking I mean there s areas where it s ponding water right now It s not draining very well There s really no improvement that we can take to undertake that without you know tearing up the street basically so For the watermain that I think we ve identified at least 9 watermain breaks here in the recent past Those are nuisances I would say to the property owners out there It s our estimation that as that cast iron pipe continues to degrade with the hotter soils in this area more corrosive soils that we d anticipate seeing more watermain breaks as well and Mr Kawlewski alluded to the I I issue that s out here There is a lot of ground water and potentially surface water that we know that gets into these pipes There are settled pipes in this area that we ve identified and if you get too much infiltration too much ground water clear water basically entering these pipes you have a potential a tendency potential for that sewer system to back up into people s properties too so that s a concern of our s as well We do jet these lines out but as the pipes fail more and more every year it s a greater likelihood to have more significant problems down the road so you know just to put it quantitatively it s something that this neighborhood ranks high on our to do list we feel just because of the problems that we ve identified in this neighborhood Councilman McDonald Well part of what I think I m hearing you say and correct me if I m wrong in this but evidently the infrastructure the road bed the things that make up the road there s quite a few areas because of water over the years and those types of things it isn t going to last much longer and there is no quick fix for that at that point I mean we would be looking at you can t just throw gravel unless we want to go to gravel roads or something and continue to do that in order to I guess keep the costs down I m not sure what that really does Is that where we re at Paul Oehme Well I mean it s the streets are a little bit better than just gravel but I mean eventually if we leave the streets go they will more or less turn into aggregate so it s you know it s a level of service What s the level of service what quality of streets do we want to provide for our residents in the community It basically comes down to that and the nuisances and the potential problems down the road with some other infrastructure The streets have basically reached their design life and really should be replaced at this time Councilman McDonald Okay Todd Gerhardt Paul Kevin can you go to the PCI test results in your slide and just explain what the PCI testing results are and how you come about that Kevin Kawlewski Certainly Pavement Condition Index is a result of measurements actual field measurements of various types of distresses Edge failures Alligator cracking Severe longitudinal cracking So it s an actual measurement of a condition of the road and that is the 9
68
Chanhassen
City
Council
January
25
2010 measurements
are
done
objectively
based on
criteria
established
and
generally accepted
by
MnDOT
and
Federal Highway
Administration
and
that
s what
they
use
to
monitor the
conditions
of
their
roads When
we
start
getting
high enough
numbers
it
drives
that condition
index
down
So
when you start getting down to values of 18 you re distresses are severe enough that you ve got very little time left on the actual surface that it will start pulverizing with complete failure here ending up with potholes aggregate surfaces So it s an actual measurement of the condition of the road based on just the surface just the pavement condition It doesn t factor in curb line settlements It doesn t factor in boulevard issues It s strictly the condition of the pavement So when you go through a pavement rating system like this the first step is to measure the condition of the pavement Once you ve done that you ve got a value that sets priorities on different areas Then you go back out and you start assessing one of the peripherals Okay now we ve got curb line settlements We start looking at what s underneath We televise sanitary sewers It s a visual inspection of the condition You can see sags in it You can see water coming in through joints in the pipe so it s a quantitative method of actually determining what that condition is The watermain when you ve got significant breaks you can identify what the source is Is it corrosive soils Is it eating the joints Is it destroying the thing holding the pipes together Cast iron in corrosive soils like that tends to weaken faster You have to take special precautions with what you put in there Whether you re using stainless steel bolts and fittings If you have to wrap it in plastic to keep the soils away from the pipe and the fittings themselves so there are methods of measuring the things you re asking about But what this tells us is that based on the overall condition of the street based on criteria for rating these streets are nearing the end of their cycle Does that answer your question Todd Gerhardt How can you have a 20 an 18 and then jump up to a 41 and 64 What causes that Kevin Kawlewski It can be sub grade conditions Primarily that s what it is Sub grade conditions If you ve got soft soils If you ve got high ground water Increased axle loadings The traffic it s receiving It s a general conglomeration of things Generally it s the soils and the water within the pavement zone Once you get into frost cycles it s moving continuously and if you get heavier loadings when it s soft and the frost is coming out that s going to damage your surface Paul Oehme And Mr Gerhardt one other thing regarding those two numbers Those areas were down to 29 and 30 respectfully City crews went in in 2000 I believe and did an overlay of those areas Just to keep that street together because that is a pretty significant steep hill and I think that areas of that roadway actually washed out in particular so those areas were maintained by the City and that s why they rate just a little bit higher Todd Gerhardt And so it was 2000 you did the overlay and then Paul Oehme Right It jumped Todd Gerhardt And then in 2001 it started coming down that quickly already 10
69
Chanhassen
City
Council
January
25
2010 Paul
Oehme
Right
yeah
And so
it
came
down
We rated
that
area
again
in 2006
and
it
basically
dropped 40
points
Mayor
Furlong
Thank you
Any
other
questions
for staff
at
this
point
Councilwoman Ernst
Councilwoman
Ernst
So
Paul why
did
it
drop
40
points What was the cause of that Paul Oehme Again it s just a surface patch It s not a structural improvement All we did was basically overlay the road with it and bituminous surface Just to keep the resurface that area because of the potholes and the wash out areas Just to produce a new riding surface basically so It wasn t anything structural We didn t really rip up the road at all We just wanted to patch it Councilwoman Ernst You know I typically ask this question for every project like this that s introduced and can you give us and those that are listening some kind of an idea of what has been done to conserve the financial piece of it in terms of completing the project but yet looking at ways to do this in a conservatively way Kevin Kawlewski The biggest thing we ve looked at again is the pavement section The geotechnical engineers have come out recommending a 2 foot section of sand without a geotextile fabric so we ve looked at reducing the amount of excavation Reducing the amount of material we have to haul back in and putting that layer of geotextile in That s probably the most significant If when we look at at sags in the pipes as Paul indicated those can t be fixed with the trenchless system such as a lining or piping situation so here we ve got room to dig and it s the most cost effective means to do it and the improvements that we have to make can t be done without digging the pipe out and fixing it So the most economical thing we can do is adjusting the pavement section The other improvements are necessary As far as the sanitary sewer and the water it s simply just the most economical means that we can do Now we could look to go a little bit further with the pavement section but I would not recommend that We ve already come up a little bit from where the geotechnical engineers are recommending but we re looking at it from kind of a compromise between what they want and what s going to be economically feasible Councilwoman Ernst And what is that cost versus one or the other Do you know what that is Kevin Kawlewski I don t have that number off the top of my head no Mayor Furlong Any other questions at this time Okay Mr McDonald did you have any other questions at this time Councilman McDonald I m fine Mayor Furlong Okay thank you Thank you Then what I d like to do at this point is open up the public hearing and invite people to come up and ask questions Provide comments Ultimately what we re looking for as a council is your thoughts on whether or not just first of all this project needs to be done And second of all if you have comments with regard to how it s 11
70
Chanhassen
City
Council
January
25
2010 proposed
to
be
funded
we d
appreciate
seeing
those
Anything with
regard
to
the
scope of
the
project
or
the proposed
design
or
changes
or improvements
Any
questions
on
those or
comments
or
suggestions
are always
welcome
as
well
What I
d
like
to
do
we have a number of different as is typical of the neighborhood different streets so what I d like to do just to make sure that we have a chance for everybody to be heard and if there are common interests on the same streets I d like to have those at the same time So if everybody s willing I ll call you up by streets and we ll start with Erie Avenue and invite any resident on Erie Avenue to come forward We ll work through with Erie Spur Dakota Lane Cheyenne Avenue and then Erie Circle at the end and then have time for anyone else that would like to speak or if someone missed their street there s time We ll be here to listen to everybody So with that let s go ahead and invite anyone on Erie Avenue to come forward and address the council with questions or comments on this project Jeanette Schultz Good evening Mr Mayor and City Council members Mayor Furlong Good evening Jeanette Schultz My questions are Mayor Furlong And I m sorry I ll interrupt because it was my fault for not saying it If you could when you come up state your name and address for the record Jeanette Schultz Oh sure Mayor Furlong We would appreciate that Jeanette Schultz Jeanette Schultz 8041 Erie Avenue Mayor Furlong Thank you Jeanette Schultz Our home happens to be located where there s a fire hydrant on the corner situated I have one question Or I have a few questions really First of all has any study been made to the fact that there are natural underground springs in the area Because there are I mean you drive up Erie and almost year round you see some of the sump pumps pumping out into the street so I mean is that has that been taken into consideration with the road construction Paul Oehme It has Jeanette Schultz The reconstruction Paul Oehme Right yeah Jeanette Schultz Okay Mayor Furlong Mr Oehme maybe you want to 12
71
Chanhassen
City
Council
January
25
2010 Paul
Oehme
Sure
I
ll address
that
We
deal
with natural
occurring
springs
all
the time
The
last
reconstruction
project we
did
on
Laredo
Drive had
the
same
situation
so And
the
pavement
design
what we
have
is
a
drain tile
on
both
sides
of
the street to take care of some of that That naturally occurring ground water and what the drain tile also allows us to do is have the property owners they can tie into that drain tile system so it doesn t dump over on top of the road We can actually tie into that drainage so it s underground and then that tile system connects onto our storm sewer system to take the water Jeanette Schultz It s not that we personally have a issue with it but it s an issue in the area Paul Oehme Right Jeanette Schultz Also with the new new street per se we notice in driving on Cheyenne that there are crackings in the road already occurring Now to the best of my knowledge and I could be stand to be corrected I believe that was done approximately 15 years ago Paul Oehme 1995 Jeanette Schultz Okay Now I mean is that what would be causing that and is that subject something we would be subject to in that length of time Paul Oehme Bituminous pavement will always crack over time so you don t want the natural or the longitudinal crack that shrinkage crack that you re seeing out there that s naturally occurring There s virtually nothing we can do to stop that but what we do as a regular maintenance preservation program we have here in the city is to crack seal those cracks as best as we can with a tar more or less product Try to keep the water out of that sub grade so it doesn t expand farther than it is Jeanette Schultz Yeah At the last time this was brought up when Cheyenne and part of Dakota was redone it was brought up to the fact because I lived in another part of town prior and there was never an issue with the streets and I was questioning why then in the Estates did it become an issue and I was informed that at the time they weren t really city when they were constructed back in I will assume 70 s And prior to I don t know Is that part of the reason that we re having the problem we are Paul Oehme No I mean I believe the streets were in this area were constructed to the best practices that they were that they had back in the 1970 s so the cast iron pipe that was just standard pipe that they used back then and the pavement section was the same Jeanette Schultz Okay but then why in why I mean I lived previous on Chan View and that was constructed in the late 50 s early 60 s and there wasn t that issue They didn t have the same issue so I m still back to that fact Was there something that wasn t done correctly Paul Oehme I mean it s a 40 year old street almost Jeanette Schultz I understand that 13
72
Chanhassen
City
Council
January
25
2010 Paul
Oehme
Yeah
it
s and
these
streets
you
know typically
you
ll
see
them deteriorate
within
that
timeframe
Jeanette Schultz
Then
my
last
concern is
about
these
trees
on the
boulevard
because
if
you drive
down
Erie
s
street the
trees
are
ridiculously
ugly
There isn t anything beautiful about those trees I m sorry Well they re dirty year round They re shedding year round and they have been trimmed and there are limbs that are literally just virtually hanging across the street I mean a lot of the trees are leaning I don t know maybe some people think those are beautiful I guess I can t see it but you know that s my personal opinion Is that a consideration and at what time will it be determined which trees are going to be removed and which aren t Paul Oehme Yeah we we ve preliminarily determined that I think between 40 to 50 trees along the boulevard will have to be removed Jeanette Schultz On Erie Paul Oehme Well on Jeanette Schultz Or throughout Paul Oehme Throughout the project locations so if we can provide that information for you at a later date if you d like us to Jeanette Schultz I guess being that there s a water hydrant on the corner there is an ash tree sitting next to it Would the chances that that ash tree being removed be probable Paul Oehme Yeah if there s trees next to hydrants or water services the private properties the residents those typically would have to be removed and to get that service replaced Jeanette Schultz Okay And lastly we have put in a concrete driveway How far up do you anticipate that you re going to have to cut into our driveway for this project Paul Oehme Yeah driveways are typically between 5 to 10 feet we re have to cut But if you have a concrete driveway what we d like to do is take it back to that first concrete joint Typically your driveway would have a it would be jointed so we d like to saw cut at the first concrete joint Remove those panels against the against the street or against the curb and then pour back a new concrete driveway in your case so Which is included in the project cost Jeanette Schultz Okay And how thick is that concrete to be Do you know that Paul Oehme We typically match what s out there I think our standard design for driveways is about 6 inches Jeanette Schultz Okay I m just I was just wondering Well thank you very much for your time 14
73
Chanhassen
City
Council
January
25
2010 Mayor
Furlong
Thank
you
And the
one
thing
I
would suggest
too
if
there
are specific
items
such
as
that individual
tree
Ms
Schultz
that you
re
interested
in
if we
can
try
to
get back
specifically
there
because
sometimes we
can
talk
in
generalities
here but we can t be specific Staff doesn t have the plans in front of them to say yes this is in or this is out so I don t want to leave any false impressions but if any residents have specific questions on that I would suggest they contact or staff if we can somehow make sure that we get back to those people with those specific questions on the project Yep thank you Others from Erie Avenue that would like to address the council this evening Rick Uglum Hello Mayor and council Mayor Furlong Good evening Rick Uglum My name s Rick Uglum I m at 8016 Erie Avenue I just the question I have has come to the more of a financial perspective is how did you come to the quantitative breakout for each you know for the people It looks like you just split it out evenly across rather than proportional to the street section that he might have associated with that I m speaking personally because I have about 20 feet at the most and so for that to be close to someone that s got a corner lot that s got or further into the neighborhood it just doesn t seem proportional in nature to other projects that I ve been familiar with in other neighborhoods and stuff Paul Oehme Sure Our standard assessment practice here is that if your driveway affronts the project in question to be reconstructed or improved upon proposed to be improved upon you d be considered in that assessment roll so the City does not have a front footage assessment practice like some other cities do or it s just a per lot per parcel assessment Rick Uglum So it s just a city practice is that what it is Versus other I mean Mayor Furlong And I think some cities do it by frontage Paul Oehme Front footage Corner lots are handled a little differently Rick Uglum That s what Mayor Furlong Some cities do it by square footage So different size lots have different I think historically what the practice has been is doing it by lot The assumption that people driving a car in and out of a driveway are using it whether their front footage is a corner lot or at the end of a cul de sac That s another issue that we have in some neighborhoods I know we have a few here where you have a very narrow front footage and maybe more of a rectangle or triangular lot shape so that has been our practice over the years is to do it by lot By driveway access Rick Uglum So it wasn t something that you guys chose to do just I mean it s just something that you do general 15
74
Chanhassen
City
Council
January
25
2010 Paul
Oehme
That
s
correct Todd
Gerhardt
Well
of
the last
3
reconstructions
we
ve done
it
was
based
on a
per
lot
basis
I would
say
a
majority
Kevin you
tell
me
if
I m
wrong
WSB
is
a consulting
engineer
that
we
ve hired and work in a variety of communities and I would think a majority of the practice is a per lot versus front footage basis wouldn t you say Kevin Kawlewski That s what I ve seen I ve been doing these for 15 years Generally when you re doing a reconstruct like this the premise is that everybody uses the street the same as Mayor Furlong says Now typically if you re getting more into commercial where there are other uses where there s more traffic generated things like that it s a front footage is a more practical way of doing it But where you re in a residential where everybody is pretty much using the street the same it s more common practice Mayor Furlong Any other questions Rick Uglum No that s it Mayor Furlong Okay Rick Uglum Thanks Mayor Furlong I guess one thing if I could Mr Uglum Should the project go forward or not do you think there s a need for it I think I forgot to ask Ms Schultz that but what are your thoughts on that Rick Uglum Yeah well I know where the cul de sac right where I live is pretty bad so I mean it s it doesn t drain well and I mean it drains into the driveways so it s really really bad around the edges But there s more dirt gathering there just from the soil or from the soot from the streets and it s gathered in front of our driveways and stuff more than anything so Mayor Furlong Okay Very good thank you Anyone else from Erie Avenue Yes Ms Schultz Jeanette Schultz I would agree I think it is high time that that street get fixed because it is ridiculous Every spring the pot holes are terrible Mayor Furlong Okay Jeanette Schultz I m for the street being done Mayor Furlong Very good thank you for clarifying that and my apologies for not asking while you were up at the microphone Anyone else from Erie Avenue that would like to address the council 16
75
Chanhassen
City
Council
January
25
2010 Connie
Hatton
Connie
Hatton
at 8018
next
door
I
do agree
the
street
is
not very
good
I
didn
t quite
understand
what
you
were explaining
to
him
If
you live
on
a
cul
de sac
am
I
charged
more for
that
or
not
Todd
Gerhardt No Connie Hatton Okay Todd Gerhardt There s two approaches that you can use when assessing for street improvements You can do it on a front footage basis Typically as Kevin mentioned that s done in commercial office industrial areas We do it on a per lot basis We ve done 3 to maybe 4 reconstructions in the last 10 years and we want to stay consistent with our assessment practice and it s always been a per lot basis Connie Hatton Okay That s what I was wondering And I didn t quite also understand if a tree s torn down does the homeowner pay for that Or is that included in the assessment Paul Oehme That s included in the project cost Connie Hatton It is okay And are these roads going to be a little more what am I trying to say Sturdy for we have a lot of garbage trucks and Schwann trucks and I mean are they going to be not falling apart as fast with all the heavy trucks going through all the time Paul Oehme That s the intent yeah 9 ton road so it s it ll be a lot heavier pavement section than currently Connie Hatton Okay then like 40 years ago or whatever Paul Oehme Exactly Connie Hatton Okay That s all I was wondering then Thank you Mayor Furlong Okay Thank you Todd Gerhardt Mayor council members I d just like to add one comment There is life expectancy to streets curbs gutters and we typically like to get 30 to 40 years out of a street so you know in another 30 40 years if God willing we re all here again we may be talking so there is a life expectancy to this Jeanette Schultz I guess I have one other Mayor Furlong That s fine If you can come to the microphone Ms Schultz Jeanette Schultz Let me ask you the trees that are going to be removed will they be replaced with something other than maybe green ash 17
76
Chanhassen
City
Council
January
25
2010 Paul
Oehme
Yeah
our
practice for
these
reconstruction
area
is that
if
we
take
a tree
down
we
typically
don t
replant
a
tree
in the
boulevard
That
s
the homeowner
s
responsibility
if
they so
choose
to
replant
Jeanette Schultz
Okay
so
whatever
tree comes down it will be void Paul Oehme Right what we ll do is re sod that area Placing top soil re sod it for you Jeanette Schultz Okay Alright thank you Mayor Furlong Yep Mr Gerhardt Todd Gerhardt We do have a tree boulevard program If you contact City Hall here and talk to Jill Sinclair If you d like a boulevard tree other than an ash we have a variety of different makes where the City would come in plant the tree in your front yard and then we re responsible for the maintenance of that tree So if you d like a boulevard tree just give Jill Sinclair a call here at City Hall or myself and I can get you in contact with Jill and put you on the list for a boulevard tree Jeanette Schultz Okay Audience I m sorry are we able to get a copy of some of this information tonight Todd Gerhardt There should be copies over on the table if somebody didn t get one of the report Mayor Furlong While she s getting that is there anybody else from Erie Avenue that would like to address the council this evening at this time Let s move on then to Erie Spur Is there anyone from Erie Spur Good evening John Cherico Good evening everyone Mayor Furlong Good evening John Cherico My name is John Cherico I m on 8054 Erie Spur I have 3 questions and then some comments First question deals with the 5 to 10 foot tear out that s going to be on the driveways Will that be consistent on all the property Mine is on a cul de sac and a corner lot Does that mean that all of my property at that length or distance could be cut out Paul Oehme Typically I would say at least 5 feet in back of the curb In order for the contractor to replace the storm sewer system the watermain the sanitary sewer and then put the curb machine back in we typically need at least 5 feet in back of the curb Depending upon the grades in the area we might need a little bit less or maybe a little bit more depending upon the slopes So it s going to vary a little bit but we ll be and before the contractor starts digging in the front yard we typically mark the driveways and how far back we need to go with those so 18
77
Chanhassen
City
Council
January
25
2010 and
in
final
design
we should
have
a
pretty
good idea
of
how
much
boulevard is
going
to
be
disturbed during
the
construction
process
John Cherico
Okay
Second
question
is are
you
going
to
remove street
lamps
and
if
so will
they
be
replaced
Paul
Oehme The street lights in this area are I think they re owned and maintained by Xcel We pay for the power and some maintenance but Xcel typically handles the overall maintenance of those street lights We are not proposing to replace those street lights at this time but we have contacted Xcel letting them know about the improvement project and if they so choose to replace them at that time they may choose to but we haven t heard if they re going to or not John Cherico Well is there a chance that we might not have street lights Paul Oehme No you ll always have the street lights there We re not proposing to add any more We re not proposing to take any more out But Xcel might choose to replace the street lights if they so choose at this time We also have talked to Mediacom and Centerpoint the gas company to let them know about the project that potentially it will be forth coming this summer if council approves it and they potentially would be replacing some of the other infrastructure in the their private utilities in the area in conjunction with our project too John Cherico Okay Third question Maybe this gentleman would field it This is concerning the 5698 estimate You said that the bids are coming in 15 to 20 percent lower than the estimate Does that mean we can anticipate a 15 to 20 percent decrease in this number Kevin Kawlewski Yeah John Cherico So it would be closer to 4 900 roughly Kevin Kawlewski Again that s going to vary That s going to vary with the actual bids received but I would anticipate that number will come down John Cherico Yeah I think it would be good if folks knew that It d sure save us some money Okay those are my last questions My last comment is I ve only lived in this area about 4 years but I can tell you that I ve seen a rapid deterioration of the road If you look at your diagram there up on Erie Avenue that little that first turn there there s a cul de sac there Mayor Furlong If you want to point Mr Cherico right on that map there I think it will come up No no If you left it where it was John Cherico Oh that s Okay right here This area Mayor Furlong Okay thank you John Cherico That s the turn During the springtime I completely avoid that area I take the long way around to get to my house which is on Erie Spur because that road is in such bad shape 19
78
Chanhassen
City
Council
January
25
2010 and
most
of
the
roadway is
that
way
Right
here on
Erie
Spur
where
I live
right
on
the
corner here
with
the
runoff
and the
melt
there
is
a pond
that
s
growing
and forming
I
thought
maybe
we could
get
one
of
those
wood duck boxes and put it up here because it just expands every spring and the entire area the roadway really is whoever says I can live with it must not go out of their house because the road is dangerous For joggers For walkers A lot of people walk their dogs It s for your car Like I say I avoid certain areas in that area because it s in such bad shape I m not thrilled about paying 5 000 but somebody s got to do it and this was on the docket I think several years ago and was tabled and now we re paying more than should have been paid then so if we don t take care of it now it s only going to get pushed onto somebody else so I m in favor of it I hope you do it Mayor Furlong Very good thank you Others from Erie Spur that would like to address the council this evening Let s go to Dakota Lane then Anyone from Dakota Lane Good evening sir Mel Lenander Mel Lenander 8103 Dakota Lane I m the second house down from Cheyenne Mayor Furlong If you d like to just if you could point on the piece of paper Mel Lenander Okay This lot here The one with the crooked line on the north side Mayor Furlong Very good thank you Mel Lenander I have a storm drain right along between my lot line and the one on the north side of that and what will happen to that particular drain Paul Oehme Sure If you want to bring that The drainage map Kevin Kawlewski The plan is to there s an existing culvert down here at the bottom That would be replaced Are you referring to the existing ditch in here correct Mel Lenander Yes Kevin Kawlewski The plan currently is not to do anything with that Now if that s something that you would like to see done we could address that during final design but right now we re planning on putting new pipe down in this location and leaving the ditch there It s fairly steep It s almost a ravine as opposed to a ditch Mel Lenander Yeah it is Okay So that would just you d plug it up Kevin Kawlewski We would it would pretty much stay untouched unless you would prefer to see something done with it We ve talked about it at a staff level There is a high amount of material that would be coming out of the streets for the pavement section It would be a place that it could be suitable for fill from the street It s handy It s close Could eventually lower costs if it s something that you would like to see done That s something that we can certainly talk about 20
79
Chanhassen
City
Council
January
25
2010 Mel
Lenander
But
you
would be
plugging
that
drain
Kevin Kawlewski
We
would
not
be plugging
it
Mel
Lenander
Oh you
would
still
Kevin
Kawlewski It
would
still
function
as it
does
yeah
Todd
Gerhardt So
Kevin
if
I
understand right
now
it
is
sheet
draining down into Rice Marsh Kevin Kawlewski Yes Todd Gerhardt And we re putting in a new catch basin and then piping that into a storm water pond Kevin Kawlewski Yes Todd Gerhardt So and one suggestion would be to fill the ravine in Bring that back up to grade Seed it and then let the property owners maintain that area Kevin Kawlewski Correct Paul Oehme We looked at that preliminarily It s a very deep ravine Steep grades on each side Lots of trees in the area We looked at it and when we set the budget we never considered addressing that issue with this project There might be a project down the road that if we wanted to look at that in the future Otherwise you know there is a lot of material that s coming off the project We can talk to the contractor and if he gives us a decent price on it and it meets our budget we can look at that Todd Gerhardt Could you do it as a bid alternative and then bring it back for council to consider if they want to Paul Oehme Absolutely We can take a look at that yeah Because it is it is it s a nuisance out there There is a lot of erosion coming off that area running down into our into the pond area back in there Todd Gerhardt Do you think the neighborhood wants that filled in or do they like it the way it is Mel Lenander Well I guess I wouldn t mind if it was filled in back in a little further Todd Gerhardt How about your neighbors Have you talked to them or Mel Lenander I have one neighbor on the other side also 21
80
Chanhassen
City
Council
January
25
2010 Audience
I
don
t
know the
ravine
s
kind
of nice
Mel
Lenander
I
guess I
would
you
know
the storm
sewer
the
pipe
the concrete
just
goes
down
so far
and
would
you
be extending
that
somewhat
or
we do
get
a
lot
of
wash Erosion and that Dirt Paul Oehme We re trying to eliminate as much water from that ravine as we can and that s the impetus for adding that secondary outlet pipe to the south there Between the other lots Kevin Kawlewski By redirecting we would take away some of the water that s contributing to the erosion in this area Now if it s a case where we can do something with this ravine make it less deep Make it a little easier to maintain That s certainly something that can be considered Mel Lenander Now I wouldn t propose filling it in all the way down or anything like that Just you know leveling it off a little bit where that up to where the pipe comes out Kevin Kawlewski Certainly Mayor Furlong Take a look at some options Paul Oehme We don t have any easements out there or any rights to go onto that That s private property so if any work would be done out there we d definitely have to get some right of entries or temporary easements to construct whatever improvement it needs Mayor Furlong Well at least it sounds like it makes sense to talk to the property owners and look at some alternatives Paul Oehme Absolutely Mayor Furlong If there s a way to Paul Oehme And if it makes sense for us If it fits our budget by all means Mayor Furlong Yep okay Alright Mel Lenander You mentioned the storm or the the sewers in the street there Cast iron you said and you re going to use cast iron again Kevin Kawlewski Well for the watermain we d look at ductile iron pipe which is less or is more tolerant to corrosion We d look at stainless steel fittings and we d also look at probably a polyethylene plastic wrap around the pipe It s also going to prevent some of that corrosion Paul Oehme Our typical standard is PVC pipe too so for the watermain and then the ductile iron fittings and we always wrap that so the PVC pipe is something that we ve gone to It seems to be working well for us so Probably end up using that here It s about the same cost as the ductile iron but it seems to it s a little bit easier installation 22
81
Chanhassen
City
Council
January
25
2010 Mel
Lenander
Probably
last
longer too
Paul
Oehme
It
could Mel
Lenander
That
s
all I
had
Mayor
Furlong
Okay Mr
Lenander
before
you
go if
I
could
ask
as far
as
the
overall
project The
street
project
do
you think
it
needs
to
be done or not and the other Mel Lenander Well I voted against it last time but I guess we re getting to the point where it probably needs replacing Mayor Furlong Alright very good Thank you Before we go on if I could beg everybody s indulgence On this picture back up here and we talked about the new storm water piping and that existing pond down there Is that is that the pond that the staff report says has some excess capacity in it that we could do a better job managing some of the storm water in this area Paul Oehme Yeah absolutely Mayor Furlong Okay Currently it sounds like some of the area just sheet drains directly towards Rice Marsh Lake Kevin Kawlewski This area down here all tends to get over here This area washes down into this area We re trying to capture a lot of this water up in here and get it over here so it doesn t continue on straight to the south Mayor Furlong Okay Thank you Others from Dakota Lane that would like to address the council Okay How about Cheyenne Avenue Anyone from Cheyenne Avenue Erie Circle Jessica Boevers Hi Good evening Mayor Furlong Good evening Jessica Boevers My name is Jessica Boevers and I live at 8113 Erie Circle and I will start by answering your first question if I think it should be done and I m going to give you a yes and a no Mayor Furlong Okay Jessica Boevers I would be honest because some of the people who live on Erie Avenue have been honest I think it is pretty bad up there but my no comes down to now where I live on Erie Circle and we talked about this a little bit earlier when we were talking about the PCI score You brought up the 64 and that s where we re currently at and it seems to be we have a little bit of ways to go before we get to that I think it was 45 you said as kind of a key number It looks like 23
82
Chanhassen
City
Council
January
25
2010 we
have
leveled
off
since about
06
so
I
am wondering
why
with
us
being at
64
why
we
are being
considered
for
this
Mayor Furlong
Fair
question
Paul
Oehme Sure
It
gets
back
to the
maintenance
of
the
street I
ll
just
put
up
the PCI ratings again For Erie Circle and it was down to 29 at one time in 2000 We put that small overlay over the street and it has gone down approximately basis points But the issue here again is it was more of a cosmetic fix It s not a long term fix we feel It s you know it s lasted for you know almost 10 years now but eventually it s going to deteriorate to the same level as the other streets on top of that On top of the hill there and so it makes sense since the streets were constructed at one time the same time basically to do the entire neighborhood at one time and we look at an average street condition There s going to be some sections of streets that are going to be over that 45 number There are some sections that are under 45 so we look at an average for the neighborhood We don t want to go in and reconstruct say one cul de sac or a section of street at one time and not address the overall street network or the street system because we still know that there s storm sewer problems down here we want to address We know that the sanitary sewer leaks The infrastructure still needs to be improved Doesn t make sense we feel to take you know some streets in a neighborhood and not address the other ones Then we re going to have a gap left over if we only do certain streets here and there Come back into the neighborhood Disturb the neighborhood again Potentially impact the street conditions with all the heavy truck traffic that will have to go in the near future with reconstructing these streets so from my perspective it makes sense to do all the streets at the same time Jessica Boevers Can I continue You mentioned some of the problems Have we experienced any of those specifically on Erie Circle The leaks and Paul Oehme It looks like there were 2 breaks that we had back on Dakota Lane Nothing on Erie Circle at this time but again the pipe is in a condition where potentially it could cause problems in the future Jessica Boevers You I ll agree there s a lot of runoff down our street and down our circle but if you re going to be doing some of the repair a little bit up on Dakota Lane that will hopefully lessen what we see on Erie Circle which should continue to extend the life shouldn t it Paul Oehme It could but again it comes down to you know the heavy garbage trucks that are coming on the roads and the small you know the thin overlay that we put in a couple years back it s not going to last forever I guess is what it really comes down to It really should be done all at the same time Jessica Boevers Well no street s going to last forever but we did see in 06 well when you did that overlay a lot of the streets dropped really fast Their PCI I can see the 20 18 but we ve leveled off so we re not digressing or going getting as bad as they are Paul Oehme And the reason for that again is that the overlay has lasted for a good many years I think it was well worth the money to get in there and treat those streets because they were down 24
83
Chanhassen
City
Council
January
25
2010 in
the
20
s
and the
30
s
but
now you
know
looking
at
the whole
street
network
in
our estimation
it
makes
sense
to get
in
there
and
do all
the
streets
at
one time
Jessica
Boevers
Okay
Thank you
Mayor
Furlong
Thank
you I guess follow up question Mr Oehme Do you know when was this street this Erie Circle was that constructed at the same time as the other Paul Oehme Our records show that it was 1972 71 72 Mayor Furlong Okay So the same timeframe Paul Oehme Same timeframe Mayor Furlong Okay Others from Erie Circle who d like to address the council Jon Held Good evening I m Jon Held from 8114 Erie Circle I guess to start off I m 85 90 percent for the project My wife and I have just bought our home roughly 14 months ago First home so just going through this whole process of figuring out what this is going to be mean for us Sounds like it s going to be worth it Obviously the streets need it to the north Down in Erie Circle I think our neighbor Jessica made a good point That they aren t quite to the place where we re going yep this makes sense for us However for the neighborhood the community it definitely makes sense I know we d like to see the movement of you know re vitalizing the neighborhood which includes the streets the homes the exteriors everything that that would entail With the financing where s the loan originating from Mayor Furlong It s basically the City provides the financing Mr Gerhardt do you want to address the issue on that Todd Gerhardt Typically what we do is assess back against your property so it will show up on your tax statement Jon Held Okay Todd Gerhardt And there ll be a line on your tax statement that says special assessments and we ll certify that every year and I think Paul is this one scheduled for 2011 would be the first payment Paul Oehme First Todd Gerhardt And right now we re proposing 10 years at 6 There ll be another hearing public hearing on the assessments At that time we ll get into more detail about the interest rate You know if you wanted to pay it off early Take a home equity loan out or whatever it may be but typically it gets assessed the next year onto your property taxes 25
84
Chanhassen
City
Council
January
25
2010 Jon
Held
6
is
a I
guess
what
The
public maybe
should
expect
but
it seems
like
a
lofty
figure for
a
city
proposed
project Given
the
incredible
achievement
funds available
currently
Todd
Gerhardt
Yeah and
that
s
something
we ll
talk
about
at
the
assessment hearing Right now preliminarily we re talking about 6 I think last year we dropped it down to 5 and so my guess we may end up that way It s up to the City Council to decide that but right now staff was recommending the 6 Jon Held So you moved from 5 last year initially to 6 Mayor Furlong No I think initially at this stage of the process a year ago it was also at 6 I think the 6 was as much a placeholder as anything else A few years ago that was a rate that was being charged Again the City financial as a practice for the City is there as an alternative to property owners if they want to defer over time The assessment but in the past year or so as rates have changed that interest rate ultimate interest rate has moved down with the rates so my recollection is I think last year we were somewhere between 1 and 1 1 2 percentage points above the estimated borrowing cost so That rate likely will move down would be my guess Following past practice but for right now it s more for information purposes I think would be a good way to look at that Jon Held Okay And I could I mean you re talking point point and a half That s a large difference Mayor Furlong It is and that s why we took a look at it last year and we made that change and to make sure that the rate was fair to all concerned and that s what we re looking at is trying to find that best rate I don t think it was the council s position that we should be the low cost lender or the lender of choice necessarily That we re not here to compete with banks or other things It is strictly to be there as an alternative for taxpayers to choose if they want to extend the assessment over time If they want to pay off the assessment in full at the time of the project they re free to do that whether they just use savings and funds to do that Whether they use other sources of financing So the purpose of that really was to put in place something some alternative for those who may not have had other alternatives Okay Jon Held So is there for the people that do not have an alternative is there interest in making profit off that financing Mayor Furlong That s not the purpose Jon Held But it would be included Mayor Furlong Well there are added costs that the City occurs because of assessments There are administrative costs and so we want to make sure that we cover those as well but in the past as I said the rate was about 1 to 1 1 2 percentage points 100 to 150 basis points that we want to look at it above the estimated borrowing cost at the time that the City would incur Jon Held So point and a half premium is what the City s charging 26
85
Chanhassen
City
Council
January
25
2010 Mayor
Furlong
Yep
Now
again whether
the
City
choose
to go
out
and
bond
for this
project
or
we
have funds
in
our
street
our street
and
road
account
We have
funds
available
to
fund this
so
we
re
not necessarily
going
to
be
borrowing
but that s the process by which we ve done it in the past Jon Held Okay Mayor Furlong Every City charges usually some type of point to point and a half above whatever their borrowing rate is for administrative overhead There s bonding costs We have to certify each year down to the County those assessments and title checks all that Jon Held In the 5 foot easement on the front of the properties any landscaping that s there currently would that be replaced or would it be our choice to say please don t replace it Paul Oehme I mean yeah that s always the option of the property owner Jon Held Sounds cheaper Paul Oehme Exactly Typically I mean if there s a nice landscaping area that the property owner wants to keep we would replace it in kind typically so that s included in the project costs as well Councilman Litsey But if homeowners prefer something else Paul then they can work with you on seeing if that s Paul Oehme Right Sod is the standard Jon Held There s one curious I m located if I can figure out which lot I m looking at here Down here the second house on the right entering Erie Circle My neighbor and I share my neighbor to the left facing the street we share kind of a dividing landscaping with a large boulevard tree Is he impacted The corner lot there by this project His driveway isn t Paul Oehme Yeah his property s not proposed to be assessed for this project because he does face Dakota Lane Kind of out of the project limits of this project so he s not proposed to be assessed When Dakota Lane west of here gets improved he would be considered for that assessment Jon Held Thank you Appreciate it Mayor Furlong Very good thank you Appreciate your comments Todd Gerhardt Paul is the reason for that is that is it when Hidden Lane came in they tied back into the neighborhood more Paul Oehme That s correct 27
86
Chanhassen
City
Council
January
25
2010 Jessica
Boevers
Hi
I
m sorry
We
brought
up
the subject
of
garbage
trucks
large garbage
trucks
coming
down
the streets
and
I
m
wondering what
the
City
s
opinion is
on
just
contracting
with one
hauler
and
maybe
that s
not for this
meeting
but
I m just trying to think how we can protect our investment you know going forward We don t have as many trucks Mayor Furlong You re right it s not for this meeting It s a question that has come up I guess I ll just respond to it and Mr Gerhardt if you want to Todd Gerhardt Sure Mayor Furlong It s a discussion that has come up in the past and to this point there hasn t been desire to move forward with the City contracting for a single hauler throughout the city So some cities have looked at that and Todd Gerhardt Yeah About 10 12 years ago we did an extensive study in looking at a variety of different options for waste collection We looked at dividing the community We looked at one hauler and the feedback that we got from most of the residents in the community was that some neighborhoods had worked out deals with garbage haulers to serve their neighborhood and they felt that you know they could do a better job in negotiating than having the City as one large collection And at that time it was decided to keep it as a free enterprise system An open system is what they call it and that s where we got today Jessica Boevers Thank you Mayor Furlong No it s a fair question I didn t mean to put you off It s probably a longer discussion than what we re looking at here but Todd Gerhardt I think we spent a year and a half studying it if I remember right Mayor Furlong Others from Erie Circle Connie Hatton I just had one question Mayor Furlong Sure why don t you come back up to the microphone so people at home can hear you as well Connie Hatton Are you are we having another meeting on this thing Mayor Furlong Mr Oehme why don t you bring up the schedule there Paul Oehme There s a this is a schedule or proposed schedule if the project moves forward Again if the project moves forward tonight we d like to try to finalize that the construction plans we d have at least one more neighborhood meeting to talk about the project and the assessment thth hearing would be April 26 So sometime inbetween March and April 26 28
87
Chanhassen
City
Council
January
25
2010 Connie
Hatton
So
is
that when
you
can
find
out what
it
s
going
to cost
and
how
it
s going
to
help
you
how you
re
going
to
pay for
it
Paul
Oehme
Right Absolutely
Yeah
that
s
once we
receive
the
bids
bid
opening we recalculate the assessment amount and at that time we send out another letter notifying you of another neighborhood meeting and then the assessment hearing as well Connie Hatton And then do they give you any what am I trying to say Are there certain organizations or people that help you figure out how you re going to pay for it In that what am I trying to say I mean I can see you can pay it throughout the years but oh god what am I trying to say Will they help you figure out financially budget wise at all how you can figure that out or not or you re just putting it into your property tax assessment Paul Oehme Yeah If you know you always have the opportunity to take out a home equity loan or line of credit or some other financial Connie Hatton What if you can t do that Paul Oehme Right and then it typically could go on your property taxes at that time Connie Hatton And if you don t plan on living in the house for another 10 years how does that affect Paul Oehme Well in that it comes down to with a new property owner that purchases the property you can work out a deal or whatever Connie Hatton You can okay Paul Oehme I mean I think those things are negotiated but I don t know you d have to check with your realtor Connie Hatton Okay that s what I wasn t sure Paul Oehme Your realtor or your accountant and try to figure out those type of questions I guess Connie Hatton Okay But there is another meeting Okay Paul Oehme There will be at least another one more Mayor Furlong And just to clarify There will be a neighborhood open house Paul Oehme Right Mayor Furlong As you ve had a couple of those already and you expect that sometime in late March 29
88
Chanhassen
City
Council
January
25
2010 Paul
Oehme
Yep
late
March or
early April sometime
Mayor
Furlong Likely after the
bids
have
come back
so
you
have
more accurate
numbers
Paul
Oehme
Yeah at
that
next
neighborhood
meeting we
would
definitely
know
the exact
dollar
amount
that
would be
proposed
for
the
assessments
Mayor Furlong Okay and that would occur prior to the at this point on the schedule the th proposed public hearing on April 26 Paul Oehme Right exactly th Mayor Furlong And then on April 26 that would be the time at the public meeting where we would also get that same information We being the council and staff would we can talk about that same information but the actual construction costs is based upon the bids and changes in the scope and alternatives that might be in place based upon our discussion here tonight and other comments that neighbors have brought up so there will be one more public hearing The purpose of this meeting is really to say is this a project that makes sense to move forward on Is the scope reasonable Are there some as we ve already heard tonight some possible alternatives That s what we re trying to gather here this evening Anyone else on any of the streets that I ve named Erie Avenue Erie Spur Dakota Lane Cheyenne Avenue Erie Circle or any and all other interested parties that would like to address the council on this matter This will be the last call for this public hearing then If there s nobody else I want to make sure everybody has an opportunity to be heard If not then is there a motion by the council to close the public hearing Councilwoman Ernst So moved Mayor Furlong Motion s made Is there a second Councilman McDonald Second Mayor Furlong Made and seconded Any discussion on that motion Councilwoman Ernst moved Councilman McDonald seconded to close the public hearing All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0 The public hearing was closed Mayor Furlong Any members of the council any follow up questions of staff At this point for clarification of items or questions Councilwoman Ernst Councilwoman Ernst Paul can you tell me I m glad that I mean the citizens the residents came out here today and asked a lot of really good questions and I really appreciate the fact that they came out to do that I am wondering when you had the neighborhood meeting were there any other concerns that were mentioned outside of what was talked about here tonight Or were most of those residents for the project Can you speak to that a little bit 30
89
Chanhassen
City
Council
January
25
2010 Paul
Oehme
To
my
recollection most
of
the
questions
brought up
tonight
were
talked
about at
the
neighborhood
meeting
as well
so
I
can
t recall
of
any
other
major issues
that
were
coming
up I
think
more
of
it had
to
relate
to
construction
staging and access Kevin Kawlewski That s correct Most of the opinions that we got were in favor of the project at the time A lot of the questions how does it affect me personally What s the inconvenience going to be of digging up the street Those types of questions but nothing that was really in opposition to the project Councilwoman Ernst So when our when the residents actually have some concerns or questions during the project do they have an outlet for what is that Paul Oehme Yeah well before the project even begins we ll hand out or mail out a notification of the what we get from the contractor the proposed schedule Where the project s going to start What the phasing of the project s going to be and on that notification there ll be a construction inspector s name and phone number mobile number that s going to be on site during the construction so they ll always have access to that person We ll give them city staff names and numbers that you can contact if they need something from us and then also we ll give them notifications of on the staging of the project to try to give them at least you know between 48 hours and or 24 and 48 hours before you know water interruptions or sewer interruptions that take place as well Or access issues So we try to at least notify the property owners long term what the project staging s going to be and then short term what potentially going to happen in the next day two days week type of thing so try to get as much information out there as we can Councilwoman Ernst Okay I just wanted to make sure that they had Paul Oehme Yeah last year we did have a web site that was up and then we also did have a hotline too that they could call and the construction inspector to update that hotline on a daily basis kind of letting people know what s going on Councilwoman Ernst Okay thank you Mayor Furlong Other questions for staff Mr Oehme I guess I d like to follow up and Kevin as well with regard to the questions raised on Erie Circle I know you tried to address that to the resident that posed those Ms Boevers I think I pronounced your name correctly Help me understand again Visually the street looks better than the rest Help us understand why the need is to do it now rather than deferring it to a later date What are the I want to be very clear on why we need to do that now Paul Oehme Sure Again the streets were built at the same time so that basically has the same sub structure the same pavement section that was built throughout the other neighborhood areas The city staff did go in there and do a small overlay of those streets back several years ago which is more of a cosmetic fix than anything else It did help hold the streets together potentially longer than we expected but overall that pavement section is weak We anticipate it to deteriorate fairly rapidly now once it gets down between the 50 s and 60 s PCI ranges You 31
90
Chanhassen
City
Council
January
25
2010 know
typically
pavement
sections
do decrease
or
deteriorate
faster
when they
get
down
because
the water
the
surface
water
the ground
water
freeze
thaw
cycles typically
break
up
the
pavement section
a
little
bit
stronger or
a
little
bit
faster than
when
they
were
higher
in the 80 s and 90 s So we would anticipate that the pavement section deteriorate faster Typically we do not like to leave gaps in neighborhoods for streets When you have a new street on one section of road and neighborhood a newer sectional street on another section of road we typically do not like to leave weaker non improved areas left because eventually those areas are going to have to get redone anyway and that causes disruption of the neighborhood when we have to redo those streets in the future so just inconvenience for the neighborhood again and down the road you know cost for street reconstruction is going to go up Typically historically have always gone up so yeah granted right now the streets potentially look halfway decent but you know 5 10 years down the road again where we d have to look at redoing the streets because the watermain s bad The storm sewer s bad We d like to make some improvements out there and the cost and the assessment amounts if the City keeps the assessment practice intact would definitely go up For example in 1995 when the Cheyenne neighborhood was done I think the assessments in that neighborhood I think were right around 3 000 Now same basic concept that we re doing here they re 5 600 so we re anticipating costs to be you know go up in the future as well so If that addresses your question Mayor Furlong Yeah I think it does The utilities underneath the street The watermains the sanitary sewer are there issues there that we know about Paul Oehme Yeah Again we televised this whole neighborhood and I can t speak specifically to those two streets I don t have that documentation in front of me but overall the system the sanitary sewer was fairly consistent deteriorated throughout that neighborhood so you know we want to address those I I concerns that we have Storm sewer Mayor Furlong I I can you explain for others Paul Oehme Inflow infiltration The ground water that s getting into the sanitary sewer and the surface water that potentially is getting into the system as well so we want to address that It s an overall city use standpoint so It costs money when that clear water gets into our city s system because it has to be treated and Met Council then charges more or less per gallon to treat that flowage so Mayor Furlong Okay Alright Any other thoughts Kevin Kawlewski The only other thing I would add as you look at this area you ll notice that future construction as it may occur here if you leave this gap out there s a chance that you re going to have construction traffic running through here which is something you want to prevent on your newly constructed roads Now there is another outlet over here but it s less direct than going back out on the roads that we ve just reconstructed When you take a neighborhood approach like that everything gets back onto the same cycle then That s one of the big premises behind taking neighborhoods at a time Everybody gets on the same cycle Everything deteriorates the same 32
91
Chanhassen
City
Council
January
25
2010 Mayor
Furlong
Alright
thank
you Any
other
questions
If
not I
d
be
interested
in everyone
s
thoughts
and
comments from
the
council
Who
d like
to
go
first
Councilman Litsey
Sure
I
ll
go first
Well
first
it
s already
been
said
but
I
appreciate everybody showing up and giving us their feedback It always helps to hear from the people that are actually going to be affected by the project and it s also good feedback to hear that although no one like to pay assessments basically everyone s in agreement the project needs to be done and we should move forward with that and we can take a look at our assessment practices and interest rates and stuff down the road to see that those are fair and equitable for everybody The thing here too is it s not just what s above ground but what s below ground too that needs to be addressed so some areas may be a little better than others in terms of pavement It seems to be that the system overall in terms of water and sewer really does need to be taken care of now which means having to tear up the pavement which is bad already so I m in favor of moving ahead with the project I appreciate I know in past road projects if it helps people in the audience that are residents boy staff really I think goes out of their way Being on the council I ve really seen that Make sure that you re inconvenienced as little as possible There will be inconveniences obviously when you take up a road but they really have bent over backwards to help accommodate people and I have no doubt that will continue with this project as well so be interested to hear your feedback as the project moves along and after it s completed too If there s anything we could have done differently but like I said the feedback I ve seen on the council has been pretty positive Very positive actually in terms of how the project s have been managed through the city so Mayor Furlong Okay thank you Other thoughts Councilwoman Ernst Councilwoman Ernst Well I am happy to hear that with the neighborhood meetings that for the most part the residents are in favor of it It sounds like for the most part the residents are in favor of it that are here tonight and again I think there was some very good questions raised in regards to the street lights The you know the trees The things that really matter you know and I m glad that the mayor asked the question in terms of the road that is rated at a 64 right now because that was a concern to me but now understanding what s underneath the road helps really convince me that that the project will be a good project to move forward with so I would support the project And again thank you all for coming here tonight I really appreciate hearing your questions Mayor Furlong Thank you Mr McDonald Councilman McDonald Well I kind of led it off with a question about you know this balancing act we always do and so again I think all the residents who did show up and speak it is your neighborhood that we re trying to work on and I guess I would just reflect again what Councilman Litsey has said You know I do appreciate staff s work I think you know you re very well prepared for all this and I think part of that goes to what Councilwoman Ernst has said that there s been a number of public meetings I think that you ve listened and that helps to prepare you for our questions I m in favor of going forward tonight I think we ve all said that there s another stage in all this and that we are very aware of looking at how the residents pay for this so I think that s the next step in the process but the first thing is we do need to get an idea 33
92
Chanhassen
City
Council
January
25
2010 about
the
cost
and
whether or
not
we
re
going to
be
able
to
take advantage
of
the
economy
the same
way
we
have
the past
2
years
so
I m
in
favor
of
going forward
Mayor
Furlong
Okay
thank you
Appreciate
those
thoughts
and
I too am grateful for everyone who came out tonight Winter s back and I appreciate you coming out on this evening to share with us your thoughts and ideas These projects are they do affect entire neighborhoods as has been addressed from a construction standpoint as well as we find they tend to bring neighbors together too to talk about you know how do they want their neighborhood to look Time and time again people are looking for improvements to the neighborhood Cost is always an issue and that s clearly an issue with this council and it has been since I ve been here and I know I speak for everybody Nobody s looking to waste money or spend money that s not necessary and that s why some of the questions you heard tonight are related to need Does this need to be done Is the need really there and that s where I value hearing from people who live in in the neighborhood telling us whether or not these projects these street proposed projects these proposed improvements need to be done I took advantage of the thaw that we had here these last weekends and drove through the neighborhood and have driven through the neighborhood before last fall when we were first looking at this and the roads are in pretty tough shape and I think we heard tonight from everybody that that s true So how do we and then on top of that when we hear from staff that the utilities underneath the roads are also in tough shape They need to be improved You know you put all of that together and while it may not be perfect for everybody at this point in time it seems to make sense to move forward for all concerned for the benefit so I think it makes sense to move forward The next steps obviously will be to finalize the plans Look at some alternatives as we talked about and then let s see what the actual costs are Then once we get that information we can all come back together and figure out if this really makes sense based upon the better information we have at that time in a few months so These street projects are have been in the planning stages Have been identified as a potential neighborhood project for a number of years Our as a city planning tool we look out 5 to 10 years and have identified neighborhood streets that we think 5 to 10 years from now might need these same types of improvements or something similar so this has been in the works and it s one way that we can try and stay ahead as a city and as residents of that city of some very expensive costs down the road and keeping our city looking good but doing it in a cost effective manner So I think it does make sense to move forward Do appreciate everyone being involved I would certainly encourage you to call Mr Oehme at city hall Ask any specific questions you have such as an individual tree or an individual street light or something specific to your property feel free to do that here this week or between now and as the plans are getting done To the extent there s some flexibility in the plans they can try to take care of that and try to meet your needs and so I would encourage you to do that and they can answer some specific questions as well But thank you again for everybody coming out At this point I would ask if the council would like to make a motion Councilman Litsey I d be happy to make the motion Mayor Furlong Mr Litsey Councilman Litsey Make the motion the City Council order the preparation of plans and specifications for the 2010 street reconstruction project 10 01A Erie Avenue neighborhood 34
93
Chanhassen
City
Council
January
25
2010 Mayor
Furlong
Thank
you
Is there
a
second
Councilman
McDonald I
second
Mayor
Furlong
Thank you
Motion
s
been
made and
seconded Any discussion
One
thing I
will
add
as
much as
I
said
contact
Mr Oehme
If
you
have
comments or
thoughts
that
you
d
like to share with any members of the council feel free to contact us as well I don t want to exclude us as that source but if you have specific questions on the project you can contact us but we re going to be calling Mr Oehme anyways so you might as well go straight to the source Any other discussion on the motion If not a motion s been made and seconded Resolution 2010 09 Councilman Litsey moved Councilman McDonald seconded that the City Council order the preparation of plans and specifications for the 2010 Street Reconstruction Project 10 01A Erie Avenue neighborhood All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0 Mayor Furlong Thank you everyone Audience Thank you council for listening to our concerns Mayor Furlong Thank you You re very welcome Thank you It s our pleasure COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS Mayor Furlong Let s move on to council presentations Any council presentations this evening As was mentioned I m sorry Did you have something Councilwoman Ernst Councilwoman Ernst I just really wanted to say thanks to staff for during this icy storm that we had they were really out on the roads and taking care of the city s roads so that people could get around and I just really appreciate that and I know that our neighbors do too so it was it was a treacherous drive just about anywhere you went and I just want to say thank you Mayor Furlong Thank you Todd Gerhardt I ll pass that onto the public works department and everybody that plows They do a great job It s difficult when you get rain and then the snow on top and that s what causes that build up but they did a great job prior to that Scraping up the neighborhoods especially the heavily treed neighborhoods We saw a lot of build up there so but thank you I know they ll be glad to hear that Mayor Furlong Thank you Any other comments this evening for council members Mr Gerhardt 35
94
Chanhassen
City
Council
January
25 2010
ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
Todd
Gerhardt
At
our last
work
session
we
talked about
key
financial
strategies
and one
was
doing
the
cooperative agreement
with
our
like communities in Carver
County
and
I
met last
Thursday
with
the
Carver County
administrators
I
meet
with them
on
a
monthly
basis
and Paul was helpful in giving me a joint powers agreement that Burnsville had and shared services for sealcoating and handed that out and was one of the projects that the Xcel group was going to work on and this kind of helped spearhead that project along and I got an email today from Cologne and they re very excited about it They think they re going to save about 30 on their sealcoating bids over last year so Mayor Furlong Now are we going to take a commission for the services being provided Mr Oehme Todd Gerhardt Paul s got profit in there Paul Oehme We ll be covering our costs let s say Todd Gerhardt If any of the other cities want to take on and take that project they can do that too That s what I offered up I said if anybody else wants to coordinate it they can and we ll definitely join in but somebody needs to share the administrative expense of taking it through the process so that was included in there So the group s excited I think that s something we can carry through yet this year That s all I have Mayor Furlong Okay very good Any questions for Mr Gerhardt or staff Okay very good CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION None Mayor Furlong There was one item unfinished on our agenda this evening from our work session Discussion Given the hour and given that Councilwoman Tjornhom is sick this evening I failed to mention that at the beginning I know we all wish her well I would if we have time Mr Gerhardt on our next work session agenda let s defer that Todd Gerhardt Sure Mayor Furlong So we have a full compliment of the council and we re not discussing it late in the evening If there s no objections to that we ll defer that item Table that to a future date With that if there s nothing else to come before the council this evening is there a motion to adjourn Councilwoman Ernst moved Councilman Litsey seconded to adjourn the meeting All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0 The City Council meeting was adjourned at 9 00 p m Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim 36
95
CHANHASSEN
PLANNING
COMMISSION
REGULAR
MEETING SUMMARY
MINUTES
JANUARY 19
2010
Chairwoman Larson called
the
meeting to
order
at 7
00
p
m
MEMBERS PRESENT Kathleen
Thomas
Debbie
Larson Mark
Undestad Denny
Laufenburger
Dan
Keefe
and Tom
Doll
MEMBERS
ABSENT
Kevin Dillon
STAFF
PRESENT
Kate
Aanenson Community
Development
Director
and
Bob Generous
Senior Planner PUBLIC HEARING PENTEADO VARIANCE REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO USE A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AS A TWO FAMILY DWELLING ON PROPERTY ZONED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL RSF LOCATED AT 6739 BRENDEN COURT APPLICANT CANDYCE FRED PENTEADO PLANNING CASE 10 01 Public Present Name Address Candyce Fred Penteado 6739 Brenden Court Jameson Sarah Ritter 1809 Freedom Lane David Gestach 200 Chestnut Street Chaska Troy Bader Gina Sauer 2244 Lake Lucy Road Kate Aanenson presented the staff report on this item Commissioner Thomas asked if the variance was noticed when the applicant applied for the building permit Commissioner Laufenburger asked about combining Lots 4 and 5 Commissioner Keefe asked about the orientation of the house off of Brenden Court and Lake Lucy Road Chairwoman Larson asked about the status of the second lot to the right of this property before inviting the applicant to speak Candyce Penteado provided background information on their variance request Chairwoman Larson opened the public hearing Troy Bader 2244 Lake Lucy Road the lot adjacent to Lot 5 stated his primary concern was with enforcement of the variance and that this not become a rental property in the future when the applicant sells the house In addressing Mr Bader s concerns Fred Penteado clarified that the neighborhood association restricts rental properties as well as City requirements for rental permits Chairwoman Larson closed the public hearing After comments from commission members the following motion was made Laufenburger moved Thomas seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission as the Board of Adjustments and Appeals approves Planning Case 10 01 for a variance to use a single family dwelling as a two family dwelling on property zoned Single Family
96
Planning
Commission
Summary January 19
2010 rd Residential RSF
located
on
Lots 4 and
5 Block 1
Brenden
Pond 3
Addition
based
on
the staff
report
and
adoption
of the attached
Findings
of
Fact
and Action
All
voted
in
favor and
the
motion carried unanimously
with a
vote
of
6
to 0
PUBLIC
HEARING
DOWNTOWN
REZONINGS
REQUEST FOR REZONING FROM GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT BG TO CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT CBD ON TH PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WEST 78 STREET BETWEEN KERBER BOULEVARD AND POWERS BOULEVARD WEST VILLAGE HEIGHTS NDRD 2 AND 3 ADDITIONS REZONING FROM GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT BG TO AGRICULTURAL ESTATE DISTRICT A2 ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 5 AND MARKET BOULEVARD OUTLOT A CROSSROADS PLAZA ADDITION AND REZONING FROM HIGHWAY AND BUSINESS SERVICES DISTRICT BH TO AGRICULTURAL ESTATE DISTRICT A2 ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 5 AND MARKET BOULEVARD OUTLOT B CROSSROADS PLAZA ADDITION AND LOT 3 BLOCK 2 FRONTIER DEVELOPMENT PARK APPLICANT CITY OF CHANHASSEN PLANNING CASE 10 02 Public Present Name Address Dick Klonbeck Investors Real Estate Trust Owners of West Village Heights Center Bob Generous and Kate Aanenson presented the staff report on this item Chairwoman Larson opened the public hearing Dick Klonbeck stated that after meeting with staff he did not have any issues with the ordinance amendment He was just identifying himself if there were any questions from the commission Chairwoman Larson closed the public hearing After comments from commission members the following motion was made Undestad moved Keefe seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the rezoning of properties from General Business District BG to Central Business District CBD on property located on Lot 4 Block 1 West ndrd Village Heights 2 Addition and Lots 1 2 and 3 Block 1 West Village Heights 3 Addition rezoning from General Business District BG to Agricultural Estate District A2 on property located on Outlot A Crossroads Plaza Addition and rezoning from Highway and Business Services District BH to Agricultural Estate District A2 on property located on Outlot B Crossroads Plaza Addition and Lot 3 in Block 2 Frontier Development Park All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0 PUBLIC HEARING DOWNTOWN PUD AMENDMENTS REQUEST TO AMEND THE FOLLOWING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS LOCATED IN DOWNTOWN CHANHASSEN 2
97
Planning
Commission
Summary
January
19 2010 CHANHASSEN
RETAIL
CENTER
MARKET SQUARE
AND WEST
ONE
APPLICANT
CITY
OF CHANHASSEN
PLANNING
CASE
10
03 Public
Present
Name
Address
Doug Hansen
11969
No
Shore
Drive Spicer
MN
56288
Bob
Generous presented
the
staff report
on
this item Chairwoman
Larson opened
the
public
hearing Doug
Hansen
an
affected
property
owner asked for clarification of permitted uses Chairwoman Larson closed the public hearing Thomas moved Doll seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the following motions 1 The Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the Planned Unit Development amendment for Chanhassen Retail Center amending Sections a c d and Lighting as stated in the attached ordinance and adopts the Findings of Fact 2 The Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the Planned Unit Development amendment for Market Square amending Section 3 as stated in the attached ordinance and adopts the Findings of Fact 3 The Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the Planned Unit Development amendment for West One amending Section 6 Zoning as stated in the attached ordinance and adopts the Findings of Fact All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Laufenburger noted the verbatim and summary minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated December 1 2009 as presented COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS Commissioner Thomas asked for an update on the Gleason Variance CITY COUNCIL UPDATE Kate Aanenson provided an update on Planning Commission vacancies the schedule for the interview process and upcoming meeting schedule Chairwoman Larson adjourned the Planning Commission meeting at 7 55 p m Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Nann Opheim 3
98
CHANHASSEN
PLANNING
COMMISSION
REGULAR
MEETING JANUARY
19 2010
Chairwoman
Larson called the meeting
to order
at
7
00 p
m
MEMBERS
PRESENT Kathleen
Thomas Debbie
Larson
Mark Undestad
Denny
Laufenburger Dan
Keefe
and
Tom
Doll MEMBERS ABSENT
Kevin
Dillon
STAFF
PRESENT Kate
Aanenson
Community
Development
Director and
Bob
Generous
Senior
Planner PUBLIC
HEARING PENTEADO VARIANCE REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO USE A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AS A TWO FAMILY DWELLING ON PROPERTY ZONED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL RSF LOCATED AT 6739 BRENDEN COURT APPLICANT CANDYCE FRED PENTEADO PLANNING CASE 10 01 Public Present Name Address Candyce Fred Penteado 6739 Brenden Court Jameson Sarah Ritter 1809 Freedom Lane David Gestach 200 Chestnut Street Chaska Troy Bader Gina Sauer 2244 Lake Lucy Road Kate Aanenson presented the staff report on this item Larson We ll start with Kathleen Anything Thomas Um I just trying to think if I do Did this get flagged when they pulled the permit for the house Is that what happened Aanenson I m sorry what Thomas Did this get like did they get or that you need the permit did it get flagged like when they pulled the permit to build Aanenson That s correct Thomas would happen Aanenson Well yeah and also they saw that
99
Chanhassen
Planning
Commission
January
19 2010
Thomas
They
had
the extra
refrigerator
and
all
that Aanenson
Yep
Thomas
Okay
That s
all
I
wanted
to know
Larson
Okay
How
about you
Denny
Laufenburger
Thank
you I
appreciate
you
getting
the information
on
those
other
homes and
I
do
have
one
question Regarding you said that this will be a combination of Lot 4 and Lot 5 The utility easement will be vacated between there So does that mean that this single family home will be the only home that will get built on the combined lots 4 and 5 Aanenson That s correct Once they re combined if they were to separate them again they d have to come back through a subdivision process Laufenburger Okay Aanenson It could be done administratively but it d have to meet the underlying zoning district so however that house sits on the lot the lot line on that back lot may have to be adjusted If for some reason that lot in the back wanted to they d still have to meet the underlying 15 000 square feet and have to be a straight so it d have to meet that criteria Larson Tennis courts Aanenson Right but once they re combined then there would be another process to go back through it Yeah Laufenburger Okay That was my questions Larson Okay And to you Tom Doll No questions Undestad No Larson Dan Keefe Just a quick one Just on the orientation of the house It s a Brenden Court address right Actually the Lake Lucy elevation looks like it wants to come off the Lake Lucy Just out of curiosity Aanenson I think the way the garage is represented in the artist rendering isn t really true If you look at the garage in this picture it is more of a flat garage so I think the architectural rendering was a little deceptive 2
100
Chanhassen
Planning
Commission
January
19 2010
Keefe
And
then
so there
could
be
another
house built
on
that
adjacent
lot is
that
or
not
Aanenson No
What
we
re
doing is
combining
the
two
Keefe Yeah
so
it
will
be one
lot
Aanenson
That
s correct
Keefe
Okay
Aanenson
And
that is a condition of approval too That the two lots Larson The only question I have is kind of regarding the lot two doors over to the right if you re looking at the map That aerial map Is that an outlot or is that a lot that will be built on at some point That real long stretch Generous The City owns Larson It s City owned Okay Alright Well that s all I have Have we got an applicant Would you please step up to the podium State your name and address Candyce Penteado I m Candyce Penteado We are the property owners of 6739 Brenden Court and this is my husband Fred Penteado and our daughter Olivia Would you like us to just sort of walk through our thoughts about the variance process Larson Sure Candyce Penteado Or answer questions Larson Yeah why don t if you want to just give us a brief summary that d be fine Candyce Penteado Okay When we went to pull permits for this lot we were informed that we had a variance request from the City that we are qualifying as a multi family home Well certainly we see ourself as a single family with my mom This is a process that we wanted to comply with and do the right thing and so we are applying for this variance and we had asked the City about not just the letter of the law which we had or the policy which we walked through in the letter that I wrote hopefully saying how our home does not have separate utilities Maintains one private entrance One driveway Car a garage stall for every vehicle and is not endangering the health and welfare of our neighbors or our community We also asked about the spirit or the intention What s the concern of having our mother in law have her own accommodations above the garage and what is the City trying to why is this policy in place basically And what they had explained was just the fact that Sharmeen had used the example of in a college community or something like that where you have sort of this transient feel to a home where it s able to be used by multiple people without accountability for the real estate or the property and certainly that s not the intention of how we re using that land It s really just to provide my mother with 3
101
Chanhassen
Planning
Commission
January
19 2010
independent
living
within
our home
and
that
was
sort of
the
spirit
of
our usage
and
we
have
a condition
included
in
here
with this
variance
that
no
part of
this
property
could
ever be
rented
and
that
would be
regardless
of
if
we
live there or anybody else lives there which I think would be a concern if I lived in this neighborhood Is that you know are they trying to build a rental property in this space and that is certainly not our purpose so we really hope that we ve established criteria that would make you feel comfortable with both the spirit and the letter of this variance request Larson Okay You guys got any questions No Okay thank you very much Okay with that I will open the public hearing If there s anybody in the audience that would like to come up and say something Troy Bader Troy Bader My wife and I her name is Gina Sauer We have at 2244 Lake Lucy Road so we would actually be just adjacent to Lot 5 Really what we have is we love the idea of what they re doing in terms of combining the lots We like the idea and absolutely respect what the applicants want to do in terms of caring for their mother and mother in law I think that s great We just actually have questions and actually they hit on a primary concern and that is what they re doing is great but the question becomes the future Once a variance is changed the zoning is changed it s permanent The applicants may not own the home Their situation could change at some point in the future and our primary concern is what happens in the future What protections are there What legitimate protections can be provided to us and for the community really to make sure that this doesn t become a rental property That s our primary concern because the character of this neighborhood can change significantly and very quickly if in fact the situations that the applicants have becomes one that there is somebody else living there Then it does become rental and what was a single family neighborhood with some homes that are at a level that people made some fairly significant investments Chose the community for reasons that it was a single family residential neighborhood has now changed That s our primary concern and I don t know what protections There was a comment about putting a restriction on that would prohibit rentals I don t know if that s appropriate If I can get some assurance from the City then in fact that that type of restriction is legitimate would be enforceable such that it would protect the neighborhood into the future fantastic We d feel good about it I just don t have the answers for that and I guess I m hoping the city or somebody else could help us with that Larson Okay Would you like to address that Aanenson Sure I d be happy to answer the question There are conditions of approval One is first of all let me the staff s point that also they are making a significant investment in their property too Whoever buys this one it s not typically one that you would find would be like a duplex or somebody renting in the fact that we require that they come through the primary entrance It gives them whoever it is ownership to make sure who s living there also is more than likely family related In the past 20 years we ve had this would be our fourth one so we don t have a preponderance of these Not to say that there may be somebody renting that doesn t have a license or but they re going through the right steps The conditions that are in the staff report is that they apply for a building permit That they combine the lots That the exterior of the home remain as a single family and that s also one of the criteria too so there s the one main 4
102
Chanhassen
Planning
Commission
January
19 2010
entrance
so
again
there s
that
control
point
for rental
so
if
you
have somebody
just
going
in
through your
basement
there
s
not the
same
maybe
control
They have
to
use
the
same one
Then
there
s
no separate
utilities
so
they
re all on one meter and then we do have that they comply with all building codes and that there is a condition in here too that we ve already put in there that with a variance these are recorded with the County so it s also being recorded that neither can it may be rented Troy Bader And that s so that will be a condition Neither unit can be rented so this would have to be more of a family situation Aanenson Correct And again there s a lot of different ways If you look at the city code just to be clear you know you can have a group home in a residential district That is also allowed by the State law Six people living in a group home so there is a lot of different things The experience that we ve had with having these we don t see them as a problem for the most part again the way they re set up because people are making a substantial investment in the home in the way that it s laid out typically It could be whether it s a special needs child as I stated earlier An elderly parent or something like that We haven t had a problem with those but these will all get recorded at the County Recorders Office so anybody doing a title search on this would find this under the variance What are my rights with this unit If someone else if they were to sell and someone else was to buy this what rights do I have Those would appear Troy Bader Okay because that s the most important thing to your point having had problems but you also had indicated earlier we don t have much experience in the city of Chanhassen with this so we really don t know what happens when it s the second third owner or maybe another generation and that s the you know a lot of this covers the front end and that s my concern is I like the fact that there can be a restriction put in My concern is the enforceability of that down the road because once people are in there can be a lot of different situations The fact that utilities aren t separated all of these type of things If I actually wanted to rent the property I could work through most of those things depending on the circumstances So I guess the key to me is the enforceability of that restriction on future rental of the property That would give us the comfort that we d be looking for That it would more than likely be a family and fairly close family situation such as that that the applicants have or it could be a child or something but we are very concerned if that s not enforceable that it is an expensive property People can get in It s very easy to supplement that when you have a rental and obviously we have a very different situation in the neighborhood So I don t know what assurance we can get from anybody or if there s the attorney for the City I would just like to know and I guess if you guys say yes it is you guys have more experience than I do but that s my primary concern You see how these things go in It s great at the beginning and then 10 years later whatever it is that seems to disappear pretty quickly or is deemed unenforceable and we re right back and the concern that we have now becomes a reality Larson Well honestly just I want to address what you just said We re not a decision making Troy Bader I understand 5
103
Chanhassen
Planning
Commission
January
19 2010
Larson
We
re
just you
know
we
read
the material
and
we
advise
based on
you
know
what
we see
And
so
the
decision making
is
at
the
City Council
and
the
law
Keefe And
the
condition
that
s required
as
a
part
of
the variance is an enforceable condition The question is who finds out and then you know ultimately if you were to find out that they were running you would come back to the city or whoever Aanenson And I just want to preface this that whether I understand your concern and again we ve had four of these in 20 years We haven t had problems with the other ones because people the people that do this are sincere in their motivation and the people buying them are looking for the same type of to meet their needs They re making a substantial investment in the home To me a larger problem would be somebody just renting their home which is a problem That they can t sell it and they rent the home and we don t know who s in there This we have a contact person We have a primary owner so we feel comfortable in managing that part of it Troy Bader And I don t think we don t question the motives of the applicants at all in any way We re just saying the applicants may not always be there That s where my circumstances change and although we can just look at it today and I understand we said I definitely understand This group isn t going to render a legal opinion I guess what I would ask and hope is that this committee itself though cares enough about that piece that the question would be asked such that of those that are appropriate that this is an enforceable restriction on that property If that s the case then we become then we re comfortable with the situation If it s not then I m Aanenson Let me clarify Because it is a variance it gets a majority vote on this the variance is deemed approved Only if there s not a majority vote would this go to City Council And again I have to reiterate you know we have stated in here and it will be recorded that it can t be rented Then our only enforcement is if we find out it s rented then we pursue action which we would any other one that doesn t meet city code We d pursue action on those Laufenburger Madam Chair Troy Bader I think really that was my concern Thank you for your time I very much appreciate it Laufenburger Just a moment Larson No well actually questions for Kate And I m just playing devil s advocate here If they needed to say move to Utah and they can t sell their house and they need to rent the entire house is this stipulation saying that they would not be able to lease out their house to somebody I mean is that an enforceable thing Aanenson What it says is neither dwelling may be rented Yep Larson I see that but is that is that a legal is that legal I don t know if that s legal 6
104
Chanhassen
Planning
Commission
January
19 2010
Aanenson
Yep
Laufenburger
It would
seem
to
me
Madam Chair
that
if
we
stipulate that
in
the
recording
of the
variance
then
that
would be
the
case
Aanenson
Right Laufenburger
Mr
Bader
is
that right
Troy
Bader
Yes
Laufenburger You
play
an
important
in this in that not only you as a citizen but you have heard Kate say that if we hear about something then we can enforce it I think it s important to recognize that Chanhassen is a community that looks out for one another and that also means that we look out to see if something s not correct and my experience not only as a citizen of Chanhassen but on the Planning Commission is that when citizens are made aware of or citizens pay attention to what s going on in the neighborhood and they feel like something s not right it s brought to the City s attention and action is taken So you ve got the role of the enforcement in the variance but it s only when we have knowledge or when the City has knowledge that something is not being handled properly then we can take action Troy Bader Yep absolutely but I hope the council also understands that s not always the easiest position to take as a neighbor when we re trying to develop relationships and those type of things Just like it s not fun for us to be here I think the reality is this is fine because we re trying to achieve the same goal and I think we all want to put the same protections in To your point absolutely we would keep an eye on it and I doubt that there would be any question here It s just that circumstances change down the road that we re concerned about But obviously if that does happen and it s not enforceable that has a significant impact on the value of our home and many of the other homes that are adjacent to it Thank you Larson Thank you Fred Penteado If okay just one question Just a clarification Larson Can you state your name Fred Penteado Yes sorry Fred Penteado the other owner of 6739 and to Mr Bader s question just want to make sure we address As we met with Angie last week on the planning commission there in addition to the protections the current association does restrict rental properties as well so you do have a second layer of protection there And my understanding if I understand Angie correctly is to rent in the city of Chanhassen one proactively needs a permit so there would be a prospective view I m not sure if that s the City s Aanenson That s correct 7
105
Chanhassen
Planning
Commission
January
19 2010
Fred
Penteado
Planning
Commission or
council
issue
but
I feel
like
there
are
several layers
of
protection
there
Larson Thank
you
Alright
is
there anybody
else
Okay
I
ll bring it
back
Close
the
public hearing
And
what
do
you think Keefe
You
know
I
think
it s fine You know happy to see a house go up there Happy to see people are thoughtful about you know about the layout of the house and I don t see an issue here And from what I see of the protection I think the variance and the statement in the variance is you know without a legal ruling on it it seems to be pretty strong Larson Okay No Undestad No I m good Larson Tom Doll Nice to see a house go in there Larson Yeah Laufenburger Same here Love development Thomas Just fine Larson Well I have nothing either I think it s a beautiful home and I know exactly where it is because I drive by it every Sunday on my way to church So very nice neighborhood Okay well with that I ll request a motion Anybody want to Laufenburger Madam Chair I move that the Chanhassen Planning Commission as the Board of Adjustments and Appeals approves Planning Case 10 01 for a variance to use a single family dwelling as a two family dwelling on property zoned Single Family Residential located on Lots rd 4 and 5 Block 1 Brenden Pond 3 Addition based on the staff report and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Action Larson Do I have a second Thomas Second Laufenburger moved Thomas seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission as the Board of Adjustments and Appeals approves Planning Case 10 01 for a variance to use a single family dwelling as a two family dwelling on property zoned Single Family rd Residential RSF located on Lots 4 and 5 Block 1 Brenden Pond 3 Addition based on the staff report and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Action All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0 8
106
Chanhassen
Planning
Commission
January
19 2010
Aanenson
I
just
want to
state for the
record then Madam Chair
if
anybody
appeals
this decisions
they
have 4
days
to appeal
so that could
be
applicant or
any of
the
neighbors
Otherwise the
decision
rests
here
unless there
s
an
appeal
Larson Okay
Alright
PUBLIC
HEARING
DOWNTOWN
REZONINGS REQUEST FOR REZONING FROM GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT BG TO CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT CBD ON TH PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WEST 78 STREET BETWEEN KERBER BOULEVARD AND POWERS BOULEVARD WEST VILLAGE HEIGHTS NDRD 2 AND 3 ADDITIONS REZONING FROM GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT BG TO AGRICULTURAL ESTATE DISTRICT A2 ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 5 AND MARKET BOULEVARD OUTLOT A CROSSROADS PLAZA ADDITION AND REZONING FROM HIGHWAY AND BUSINESS SERVICES DISTRICT BH TO AGRICULTURAL ESTATE DISTRICT A2 ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 5 AND MARKET BOULEVARD OUTLOT B CROSSROADS PLAZA ADDITION AND LOT 3 BLOCK 2 FRONTIER DEVELOPMENT PARK APPLICANT CITY OF CHANHASSEN PLANNING CASE 10 02 Public Present Name Address Dick Klonbeck Investors Real Estate Trust Owners of West Village Heights Center Bob Generous and Kate Aanenson presented the staff report on this item Laufenburger Can I speak to this what you re showing us right now Aanenson Yes Generous Yes Laufenburger To me it feels like you re opening up the possibility of space which is now covered for parking could potentially become I even hate to use this word but almost a kiosk type establishment I think they re not even present anymore but maybe a small drive thru coffee Generous Potentially Aanenson Potentially Or it could be if you look at the size of for example Jimmy John s is 1 500 square feet So that s what we intensify some of that maximizing that space and value that we ve created in that downtown core and looking at the uses Meeting with the property 9
107
Chanhassen
Planning
Commission
January
19
2010 owners
It
could
be
bigger than
that
I
think
we have
some
experience
of
looking at
Villages
on
the
Pond and
the
shared
parking
Kind of
what
those
peak
demands are
and
those
would
be some
of
the
decisions
looking in
that
making
sure
as
Bob stated on both those parking lots are maximized at certain seasons of the year For example both those both the Target site and the Byerly s site have seasonal use The garden center which we encourage It gets some visibility Some line so we know that they can support that seasonally It s how you look at those mix of uses during the winter months full time Sometimes that s used for snow removal Storage space and so we just think there s an opportunity to capitalize on that and get those trips downtown so you re right We have to look at how that mix works and the right type of use Not just to put something out there to put something out there but compatibility Laufenburger Thank you Generous Yeah and as Kate stated we did do a comparison of the uses I have the table in the book They re a little or in the report However the big change is the auto related uses are being prohibited from this district by rezoning it from general business to CBD However additional uses are permitted including some multi family and so as the city evolves in the future we think that this will provide us with a great opportunity to go forward Aanenson I just want to add one other thing Just to be clear I think the other issue we looked at is we re not creating any non conforming situations which was which is critical for an owner of a building that has to worry about that cloud but this doesn t create any non conforming situations Larson Could I ask you to clarify that You said it does not allow automobile related uses Generous Well auto repair shops for instance would not be Larson Well you ve got a tire shop and you ve got a Aanenson That would be in the business highway district Generous Yeah that s in BH This is for Thomas This is for Byerly s Generous This is well the westerly side Thomas to Office Max or Depot whatever Aanenson The BG Larson I m sorry I apologize Got it Generous And that s we believe that auto related uses are permitted in the BH district and then our industrial office parks but not in our downtown area 10
108
Chanhassen
Planning
Commission
January
19
2010 Larson
Okay
Generous
So
it s
just
auto
repair
shops things
like
that
but
any retail
could
go
into
our central
business
district
or
service uses
Things
like
that
Larson Okay
Generous
And
again
so this
is
what
in
essence will
happen
with
the
proposed
rezoning of these properties We turn additional property red on the west side of downtown and then the two areas on Highway 5 become green Staff is recommending the Planning Commission adopt a motion to approve the rezonings and as specified in the staff report No conditions of approval on rezonings but there s conditions of use that result of the rezoning With that I d be happy to answer any questions Larson Alright Let s start with you Dan Do you have anything Keefe No I m in support of this I think you know I think change is good I think you re going to get a chance to fun some things up a little bit It s not that dramatic change by any stretch of the imagination but I think you know adding some things can draw more people to downtown which is what I think we re trying to do here so I think it s good Undestad I agree with Dan Larson Okay Thomas Same Laufenburger Concur Larson As do I So do I Alright Well I will open the public hearing If anybody out in the audience would like to come up and any questions or talk about it Please state your name and address for the record Dick Klonbeck Good evening My name is Dick Klonbeck I represent Investors Real Estate Trust We are the owners of the West Village Height Center The Byerly s center Had the opportunity to sit down meet with staff Kind of go through these things and by and large I don t really have any issues with what s being proposed here tonight so I just wanted to identify myself Say I m here if anybody from the commission has any questions I m happy to answer them relative to our specific site area but I guess I d just as a point of clarification as I was going through the list and looking at the changes in the permitted uses the garden center concept How is that handled Kate with I mean because I know the grocery store Byerly s technically would do a seasonal thing Aanenson Yes we love that and actually that s through a temporary use ordinance What our temporary use ordinance allows is something that you sell already on your property that you 11
109
Chanhassen
Planning
Commission
January
19
2010 could
just
come
in
and get
a
temporary
use
ordinance to
operate
that
and
that s
what
we
ve
done so
we
just look at
whether you
need
any
services
How it
s
going
to
affect parking circulation and
so
that
would still
remain
the
same
Dick
Klonbeck Okay Generous Since you can sell inside you have an event outside too Dick Klonbeck Okay Aanenson What we don t want to do if it s not something you sell on the premise invite all kinds of transient merchants in so we want to have some control with those users so since they re already selling flowers in there that s consistent Larson Okay I have a question for you Dick Have you got any ideas as to what you would like to see go in there being that it would be on the adjacent site of your property Dick Klonbeck Well this gets to be a little bit of a tricky issue What I d like to see and what market will allow me to you know put in there are really two different things Current market conditions are a bit different from when this whole issue started and when they started this planning back in 2006 Much different world in terms of retail development I guess what I would foresee that I think something that s important to remember here this is cyclical and so we happen to be in a down period We will come out of this and then we ll be in a position at some point in the future to see future development here I guess what I would envision would be what I would call an outlot building A small building of maybe 5 000 to 10 000 square foot th footprint in size that would occupy kind of the south end of our property closer to West 78 Street In terms of what uses are there boy that s Larson I didn t mean to put you on the spot Dick Klonbeck Yeah Well I mean I do have I do have certain restrictions within my Byerly s lease so it s extraordinarily difficult for me to put in any kind of a food use out there That s a natural and that s actually the type of a development I mean we have people who have indicated interest that they d like to have space in a development like this Larson Okay Laufenburger I would just ask that you keep in mind the major occupancy that occurs on that th corner on July 4 every year Dick Klonbeck Yes Laufenburger Thank you Dick Klonbeck We are well aware of the influx of people and what happens We re happy to have people come 12
110
Chanhassen
Planning
Commission
January
19
2010 Larson
Alright
good
Okay
Good thank
you
very
much
Okay is
there
anybody
else
No Seeing
that
nobody
else
would like
to come up
I
will close
the
public
hearing
and we
ll
start
with
you this time
Kathleen
What
do
you think
Thomas
I
think
it
s really I think it s good It s a good clean up It s I think it will be good for when we get to that point eventually of being able to potentially develop the downtown or bring more influx of people in and different businesses in which is just all around good You know like kind of the one stop shopping ability to be able to go and collect different things and walk places and it seems great so I m completely in favor of it Larson Okay How about you Denny Laufenburger As am I No questions Keefe I m in favor Undestad I m good Larson Okay I will entertain a motion Undestad I ll grab this one I make a motion the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the rezoning of properties from General Business District BG to Central Business District CBD on property located on Lot 4 Block 1 West ndrd Village Heights 2 Addition and Lots 1 2 and 3 Block 1 West Village Heights 3 Addition Rezoning from General Business District BG to Agricultural Estate District A2 on property located on Outlot A Crossroads Plaza Addition and rezoning from Highway and Business Services District BH to Agricultural Estate District A2 on property located on Outlot B Crossroads Plaza Addition and Lot 3 in Block 2 Frontier Development Park Larson Have I got a second Keefe Second Undestad moved Keefe seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the rezoning of properties from General Business District BG to Central Business District CBD on property located on Lot 4 Block 1 West ndrd Village Heights 2 Addition and Lots 1 2 and 3 Block 1 West Village Heights 3 Addition rezoning from General Business District BG to Agricultural Estate District A2 on property located on Outlot A Crossroads Plaza Addition and rezoning from Highway and Business Services District BH to Agricultural Estate District A2 on property located on Outlot B Crossroads Plaza Addition and Lot 3 in Block 2 Frontier Development Park All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0 13
111
Chanhassen
Planning
Commission
January
19
2010 PUBLIC
HEARING
DOWNTOWN PUD
AMENDMENTS
REQUEST TO
AMEND THE
FOLLOWING
PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENTS
LOCATED
IN
DOWNTOWN
CHANHASSEN CHANHASSEN
RETAIL
CENTER
MARKET
SQUARE AND
WEST
ONE
APPLICANT
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
PLANNING
CASE
10 03
Public
Present
Name
Address Doug
Hansen
11969
No
Shore Drive
Spicer
MN
56288
Bob
Generous presented the staff report on this item Larson Dan Keefe I don t have any questions Undestad And again it looks good Laufenburger Just for the record Bob can you confirm this does not create any non conformance Is that correct Generous This does not create any non conforming Laufenburger Alright Larson Nothing Thomas Nothing Sorry Larson Nothing from me either Okay so should we open the public hearing Would anybody like to come up and speak All the masses of people Seeing nobody would like to come up Would you Okay Doug Hansen I m Doug Hansen I live in Spicer Minnesota We built that building in 1980 and we were all alone down there There wasn t anything down that road except that building so and we added to it in 94 and that s when it became a PUD I had one question You mentioned the car repair I ve got a Hispanic couple in that building that s repairing cars Does that apply to me now Generous No We re not rezoning the property to CBD The uses are specified under the Planned Unit Development for this property The reference to the CBD just relates to the setback and site coverage limitations so we wouldn t be changing that What the ordinance says except as modified below You follow the CBD standards and so and the PUD for that we talk about industrial uses 14
112
Chanhassen
Planning
Commission
January
19
2010 Doug
Hansen
Okay
Aanenson
I was
just
going
to
say so
the
CBD
kind
of gives
is
the
platform
Then you
modify
that
to
whatever you
want
under
that
and as
stated
this
is
kind of
one
of
the
older buildings
in
the
downtown and I Sharmeen has talked to Steve quite a bit about the uses in there Your son so again for the record that s not our intent to make it non conforming Just to create more flexibility in the future Doug Hansen I have no problem with that so thanks Larson Okay Thank you Doug Okay with that I will close the public hearing And if anybody has anything to talk about Well then would somebody like to tackle the next motion Kathleen Thomas Sure I will make a motion the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the following motions The Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the Planned Unit Development Amendment for Chanhassen Retail Center amending Sections a c d and Lighting as stated in the attached ordinance and adopts the Findings of Fact Do you want to just read them Larson Keep I think we can do them all in one right Thomas Alright The Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the Planned Unit Development Amendment for Market Square amending Section 3 as stated in the attached ordinance and adopting the Findings of Fact The Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the Planned Unit Development amendment for West One amending Section 6 Zoning as stated in the attached ordinance and adopting the Findings of Fact Larson Do I have a second Doll Second Thomas moved Doll seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the following motions 1 The Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the Planned Unit Development amendment for Chanhassen Retail Center amending Sections a c d and Lighting as stated in the attached ordinance and adopts the Findings of Fact 2 The Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the Planned Unit Development amendment for Market Square amending Section 3 as stated in the attached ordinance and adopts the Findings of Fact 15
113
Chanhassen
Planning
Commission
January
19
2010 3
The
Planning
Commission
recommends the
City
Council
approve
the Planned
Unit
Development
amendment
for West
One
amending Section
6
Zoning as
stated
in
the
attached ordinance
and
adopts
the
Findings of
Fact
All
voted
in favor
and
the
motion
carried unanimously
with
a
vote
of 6 to 0 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Laufenburger noted the verbatim and summary minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated December 1 2009 as presented Laufenburger It seems like it s been over a year since we met Larson Well thank you for noting those I didn t even have to ask I bet you were one of those kids that always sat in the front of the class Laufenburger That was me For the record Larson For the record And it is still on the record Okay COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS Larson Have we got any commission presentations Thomas I have a commission question Did we ever find out about the Gleason Variance Aanenson It was tabled Thomas Like it was tabled and then has it been at all Aanenson It s scheduled again I believe for next Monday Generous But then they asked to be Aanenson The second one yeah It s Thomas I kind of figured but I thought I would just kind of check because I haven t seen anything Aanenson Yeah it s the first one in February I believe They sent a letter requesting continuation of that Thomas Okay CITY COUNCIL UPDATE 16
114
Chanhassen
Planning
Commission
January
19
2010 Aanenson Just to
let
you know that that advertisements are
out
for
Planning Commission
vacancies
There
are
3 that
are
up
Dan
Kevin and
Denny
are all up your terms so I d encourage you to apply and those are out for advertisements so that s scheduled on the agenda th I m sorry it s not on this one but I believe we set that for either March oh I do have it The 16 Planning Commission interviews so those of you that are reapplying you will not be part of the process Everybody else will and then we ll interview and then the City Council will also nd interview so those will be ongoing The Lotus Retail Center will be on for February 2 Commercial site plan We haven t seen one of those for a while and then some of the projects th that were scheduled for the 16 will not be on so you ll probably have one variance on and then we ve got the interviews but we ll also do we ll continue as Bob showed you on the map the PUD s Just clarifying those PUD s Getting the standards up to snuff Some of those are maybe 10 15 years old so we want to bring those in to to the standards that we have today We ll keep plugging away on getting those done We shouldn t take too many meetings on that so That s all I had Larson Okay Bob you got anything We re done Okay meeting s adjourned Chairwoman Larson adjourned the Planning Commission meeting at 7 55 p m Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Nann Opheim 17
115
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard
PO Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
Administration
Phone 952 227 1100
Fax 952 227 1110
Building Inspections
Phone 952 227 1180
Fax 952 227 1190
Engineering
Phone 952 227 1160
Fax 952 227 1170
Finance
Phone 952 227 1140
Fax 952 227 1110
Park Recreation
Phone 952 227 1120
Fax 952 227 1110
Recreation Center
2310 Coulter Boulevard
Phone 952 227 1400
Fax 952 227 1404
Planning
Natural Resources
Phone 952 227 1130
Fax 952 227 1110
Public Works
1591 Park Road
Phone 952 227 1300
Fax 952 227 1310
Senior Center
Phone 952 227 1125
Fax 952 227 1110
Web Site
www ci chanhassen mn us
1 b
MEMORANDUM D 1
TO Paul Oehme Public Works Director City Engineer
FROM Terrance Jeffery Water Resources Coordinator
DATE February 8 2010
SUBJ Hill Street Drainage Improvements Award of Contract
SWMPI2 2009 02
PROPOSED MOTION
The City Council approves a construction contract in the amount of 66 582 30 to
Blackstone Contractors LLC for work to be performed for the Hill Street Drainage
Improvement Project No SWMPI2 2009 02
City Council approval requires a simple majority vote of the City Council present
BACKGROUND
The City Council authorized the advertisement for bids on November 9 2009 The plans
included a base bid intended to address the known deficiencies in the storm sewer
conveyance system and the channel erosion and sedimentation Also included was a bid
alternative for the installation of an environmental manhole to provide additional water
quality treatment for the runoff
This project involves several improvements to the channel and storm sewer conveyance
system between T H 101 and Lotus Lake The following improvements were included in the
base bid
1 Stabilization of an eroded gully located between the two existing houses
2 Removal of approximately 100 feet of corrugated metal pipe with known breaches
and conveyance hindrances
3 Installation of 183 feet of HDPE pipe
4 Installation of three storm sewer manhole structures including two sump manholes
5 The reshaping of the swale to Lotus Lake to provide a more laminar flow and to
stabilize the swale
6 Revegetation of the area including the use of a turf reinforcement mat within the
swale
7 Construction of a non weight bearing retaining wall to mask the outfall from T H
101 An alternate bid item was included in the bid for construction of a special
design drainage structure environmental manhole
The special designed structure would need to be in excess of 16 feet deep with an inside
diameter of 10 feet to treat the water from this drainage area The structure would still only
g eng swmp projects swmpI2 2009 02 lotus lk drainage at th 101 outfall hill street award construction 02081O doc
Chanhassen is a Community for Life Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow 116
Paul Oehme
Hill Street Drainage Improvements
February 8 2010
Page 2
be able to treat only rain events over one inch 1 This results in a number of logistical issues with the
installation and maintenance Because of these issues and the absence of any financial partners staff is not
recommending that the environmental manhole be included as part of this project
BIDS
Bids for the project were opened on Thursday December 17 2009 at 10 00 a m Twelve 12 total bids were
submitted The bids received are as follows
Blackstone Contractors 66 582 30 58 125 00
LLC
Minnesota Dirt Works 70 890 00 34 193 00
Doboszenski Sons Inc 73 648 34 44 052 57
Quirin Excavatin LLC 79 394 75 50 750 00
Veit Com an Inc 79 731 19 51 796 00
Peterson Com anies Inc 82 572 20 55 900 00
Kusske Construction Co 88 186 60 67 775 00
Min er Construction Inc 93 853 49 59 110 00
Sunblad Construction Inc 95 201 20 69 991 00
Sunram Construction Inc 99 695 89 51 999 91
G F Jedlicki Inc 104 780 88 49 514 91
Burschville Construction Inc 115 781 25 80 500 00
The engineer s opinion of the base bid cost was 72 412 75
Blackstone Contractors LLC has not worked in the City before Staff has completed a reference check and
their work in other cities has been found acceptable Additionally WSB Associates has had
communications with others who have worked with Blackstone and also have found their work to be
acceptable
The project is tentatively scheduled to start the week of February 8 2010 with a substantial completion date
of March 12 2010 Staff has been in contact with the property owners in the area regarding the project scope
and schedule
This project was budgeted for 2010 in the CIP Project SWMP 040 Funding for the project is proposed from
the Surface Water Management Fund The City has sent a request to the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek
Watershed District requesting that they cost share on this project
Attachment 1 CIP Page
2 Project Area Maps
3 Letter from WSB Associates Inc dated 1 19 10
c Gordy Stauff Construction Manager
Bruce Karvonen Blackstone Contractors LLC
Tracy Rust
g eng swmp projects swmp12 2009 02 hill street drainage improvement award construction 02081 O doc 117
v w
Capital Improvement Program
City of Chanhassen MN
Project SWMP 040
Project Name TH 101 Inlet Project
Account 1 720 7025 4751
Account 2
2010 thru 2014
Acconnt 3
Account 4
Description I
This project involves stabilizing a channel which directs flow from TH 101 into Lotus Lake
Department Surface Water Management
Contact Paul Oehme
Type Improvement
Useful Life
Category SWMP
Priority nla
Total Project Cost 115 000
Justification I
The adjoining property owners are concerned about the erosion on their properties as a result of stormwater discharge through the site This area is resulting in sediment deposition into Lotus Lake and a 6 foot plunge pool has formed within the Lake at the terminus of the channel
Expenditures
Construction
Total
Funding Sources
Other Agency Contribution
Surface Water Utility Fund
Total
2010
115 000
115 000
2011 2012
2010
15 000
100 000
115 000
2011 2012
Budget Impact Other I
Some turf management may be required the second year after completion of the stabilization
119
2013
2013
2014 Total
115 000
115 000
2014 Total
15 000
100 000
115 000
118
Site Location Map
Subject Properties
W E
S
1 inch 375 feet
Lotus Lake
119
Eo
u u 0 0
00 c c
ITIIT1
ZZ
C C 8
alal
ITIIT1 0 0
O E
0
u
I
O
HI
o co
G I
o
Z G
PI
I o
0
ITI
0
u
Z
I
ITI
o
J1
I
ITI
895 9 89 5 68 896 8 8 896 00 89 0 89 6 99
i 898 1
8 897 00
699 0
89 7 74
900 9
8 897 99
go 6 4
909 9
91 1 0
912 30
j 917 0
o
o
WSB
Associates Inc
0 0 O O 0 OrOO 0 0 0 0 Z IZO IZ I I O 0 o1Tl I IO CZO O 1fc OO lC IfTlOO CO O U O J 0 0 Z o O 0 OIZ HITI O O Z J IF 5 0 1TI I Z 0 UJ I I j 1 I I I f f I
1
I
I
I
l
I
I
I
I
p fTl J
I
0J F o
m @ CO c D
Q o ofll 0 0 O 0
2
CO Xl to
to to 0
fXl9
J0JtJT
0
cnzur
C fTl
s
0
i
I@en 0J
1
0l0J
00
I o
0
l fTl n
I
I
JTl z Z
Q i
5i Q l
Z I o
o ls fTl
SJ S I I JTl O UJ
lIlS lIl r I
c3 G r t r o
S
DUJ O
rr1rTJ
s
fTl Z
0
n
701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300
Minneapolis MN 55416
www wsbeng com
a 7S J 641 qXJ Fa763 M1 1700
INFRASTRUCTURE I ENGINEERING PLANNING J CONSTRUCTION
i
W S5
o
r
@ CO
Ol 1
0J
O
I I
I
I
i
1
tOtO
0
J
0
8 2
j
2S s
to
o
o
54 0
SPECIAL
i i
I
I
a
z j 8 i
T O Z
fii ri F d
o
D
I
@ STJ O OO
8 TC 916 00
0J 60 0
SPECIAl
L
0
o
0
o
HILL STREET
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
o I I J I I t I
eI
lIl a
C
CJ
0
I
ill
lf
I
17 1 0
Ol FI
Cf 1
r
I
j
1
I
I
RVg8
ljg JOY
jl r oo
ITI 0 III
IZ IF I 1 lIl
l t
I 0
1 I i Y G
1 I I
1 I 1
Y I
I I 0 J
1 I j I I J 1
1 J I 0
II 111 0
I II I
I I I
I
C l ill
t HERE N CERTIFY THAT nus PI AN SPECIF1CATION OR REPORT
WAS PREPARED B t WE OR UNDEJl JIJ DIRECT SUPER v ISI t I
AND TK4 T I AM It MY UCENSED PROFI SSIONAL ENGINEER
UNDER 1HE lAWS Of THE STATE Of l lINNESOTA
n
0
AS NOTED
DESlGHS I
BAF JAK
TODD E HU8MER
OATE Novl Imber 9 2009 uc NO 24 043
OlECKID B I PROJECT NO
TI H 1694 13
n
120
WSB
ASliociotes nt Infrastructure Engineering Planning Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South
Suite 300
Minneapolis MN 55416
Tel 763 541 4800
Fax 763 541 1700
January 19 2010
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
City of Chanhassen
7700 Market Boulevard
P O Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
Re Hill Street Drainage Improvements
City of Chanhassen Project No SWMP 12 2009 02
WSB Project No 1694 13
Dear Mayor and Council Members
Bids were received for the above referenced project on Thursday December 17 2009 and were
opened and read aloud A total of twelve bids were received The bids were checked for
mathematical accuracy and were tabulated The Engineer s Estimates for the Base Bid and the
Base plus Alternate Bid were 72 412 75 and 134 712 75 respectively It is our understanding
that the City does not have adequate available funds to award the Base plus Alternate Bid
Therefore we recommend that the project be awarded upon the Base Bid only to the low bidder
of Blackstone Contractors LLC Corcoran Minnesota in the amount of 66 582 30
We recommend that the City Council consider these bids and award a contract to Blackstone
Contractors LLC based on the results of the bids received
Sincerely
WSB Associates Inc
Todd E Hubmer PE
Project Manager
Enclosures
cc
Todd Gerhardt City ofChanhassen
Paul Oehme City of Chanhassen
Bruce Karvonen Blackstone Contractors LLC
tsf
K OI694 13 Admin Construction Admin L TR RECMMDTN 121709 doc
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard
PO Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
Administration
Phone 952 227 1100
Fax 952 227 1110
Building Inspections
Phone 952 227 118IJ
Fax 952 227 1190
Engineering
Phone 952 227 1160
Fax 952 227 1170
Finance
Phone 952 227 1140
Fax 952 227 1110
Park Recreation
Phone 952 227 1120
Fax 952 227 1110
Recreation Center
2310 Coulter Boulevard
Phone 952 227 1400
Fax 952 227 1404
Planning
Natural Resources
Phone 952 227 1130
Fax 952 227 1110
Public Works
1591 Park Road
Phone 952 227 1300
Fax 952 227 1310
Senior Center
Phone 952 227 1125
Fax 952 227 1110
Web Site
www ci chanhassen mn us
4
TO Todd Gerhardt City Manager
JJlJ 1
Laurie Hokkanen Assistant City Manager
February 1 2010 tJ
FROM
DATE
SUBJ Call for a Public Hearing on the proposed Modification for the
Downtown Redevelopment Project Area and the proposed
establishment of Tax Increment Financing District 10
PROPOSED MOTION
The Chanhassen City Council calls for a Public Hearing on the proposed
Modification for the Downtown Redevelopment Project Area and the proposed
establishment of Tax Increment Financing District 10
BACKGROUND
As a part of the development of Chanhassen Station the City signed a
redevelopment agreement with Bloomberg Companies At that time we agreed to
create a Tax Increment Financing District TIP The purpose of the District is to
allow Bloomberg Companies to offset their Assessments for the road and utility
improvements occurring to facilitate Chanhassen Station and further development
of the property surrounding the Chanhassen Dinner Theatre
The first step in the process of establishing a TIP District is call for a Public
Hearing
RECCOMENDA TION
Staff recommends that the City Council call for a Public Hearing on the proposed
Modification for the Downtown Redevelopment Project Area and the proposed
establishment of Tax Increment Financing District 10 as called for by the
Economic Development Authority
Chanhassen is a Community for Life Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow 167
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
COUNTIES OF CARVER AND HENNEPIN
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO
RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL
ON THE PROPOSED ADOPTION OF A MODIFICATION TO THE
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DOWNTOWN CHANHASSEN
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA AND THE PROPOSED
ESTABLISHMENT OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO 10
THEREIN AND THE ADOPTION OF A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN
THEREFOR
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council the Council for the City of Chanhassen Minnesota the
City as follows
Section 1 Public Hearing This Council shall meet on April 12 2010 at approximately 7 00
P M to hold a public hearing on the proposed adoption of a Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for
the Downtown Chanhassen Redevelopment Project Area the Redevelopment Plan Modification the
proposed establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No 10 a redevelopment district and the
proposed adoption of a Tax Increment Financing Plan the TIP Plan therefor the Redevelopment Plan
Modification and the TIP Plan are referred to collectively herein as the Plans all pursuant to and in
accordance with Minnesota Statutes Sections 469 090 to 469 1082 and Sections 469 174 to 469 1799
inclusive as amended in an effort to encourage the development and redevelopment of certain designated
areas within the City and
Section 2 Notice of Public Hearing Filing of Plans City staff is authorized and directed to
work with Ehlers Associates Inc to prepare the Plans and to forward documents to the appropriate
taxing jurisdictions including Carver County and Independent School District No 112 The City
Manager is authorized and directed to cause notice of the hearing together with an appropriate map as
required by law to be published at least once in the official newspaper of the City not later than 10 nor
more than 30 days prior to April 12 2010 and to place a copy of the Plans on file in the City Manager s
office at City Hall and to make such copy available for inspection by the public
Dated February 8 2010
Adopted
Thomas A Furlong Mayor
ATTEST
Todd Gerhardt City Manager
168
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard
PO Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
Administration
Phone 952 227 1100
Fax 952 227 1110
Building Inspections
Phone 952 227 1180
Fax 952 227 1190
Engineering
Phone 952 227 1160
Fax 952 227 1170
Finance
Phone 952 227 1140
Fax 952 227 1110
Park Recreation
Phone 952 227 1120
Fax 952 227 1110
Recreation Center
2310 Coulter Boulevard
Phone 952 227 1400
Fax 952 227 1404
Planning
Natural Resources
Phone 952 227 1130
Fax 952 227 1110
Public Works
1591 Park Road
Phone 952 227 1300
Fax 952 227 1310
Senior Center
Phone 952 227 1125
Fax 952 227 1110
Web Site
www ci chanhassen mn us
i
I r5li RiIIM
MEMORANDUM
A D
TO Paul Oehme Director of Public Works City Engineer f
Terrance Jeffery Water Resources coordinator
February 8 2010 pl
FROM
DATE
SUBJECT 2010 Pond Cleanout Project No SWMP18D Approve Quotes and
A ward Contract
PROPOSED MOTION
The City Council approves the quotes and awards a construction contract in the
amount of 66 852 50 with Kusske Construction Company for the 2010 Pond
Cleanout Project No SWMP18D 09 01
City Council approval requires a simple majority vote of the City Council present
BACKGROUND
In order to meet water quality treatment and rate control standards it is necessary
to maintain a minimum volume within a given pond Ponds are designed to trap
sediment and this entrapment of sediment leads to a reduction in volume within
the pond necessitating regular maintenance of the ponds Based upon field review
by City staff as well as resident concerns eleven ponds were sampled in 2009
according to MPCA protocols for possible dredging These ponds are shown on
the attached map
In addition Chanhassen is an MS4 City permitted under the National Pollution
Detection and Elimination System NPDES Under our NPDES permit we are
required to inspect 20 of our ponds annually and maintain these ponds to their
design parameters
On January 14 2009 quotes for this cleanout were requested from Kusske
Construction Company Minger Construction Company and Parrott Contracting
The three quotes received are summarized as follows
Chanhassen is a Community for Life Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow 169
Paul Oehme
2010 Pond Cleanout Project
February 8 2010
Page 2
Kusske Minger Parrott
Submitted prior to the
deadline
V olume of Cleanout
Offsite Disposal of Materials
Site Restoration
Base Bid 47 862 50 51 689 90 66 734 50
Bid Aft 1 13 355 00 17 498 80 16 104 50
Pond 9 5635 00 23 782 30 7 188 50
Total Bid 66 852 50 92 971 00 90 027 50
Based upon the three quotes received and the previous work performed by Kusske Construction
Company in the City of Chanhassen staff is recommending approving the lesser quote submitted
by Kusske Construction Company and authorizing the pond cleanout work be performed by
Kusske Construction Company Staff is recommending that five of the eleven tested ponds be
cleaned this year The remaining six ponds will receive top priority in next year s dredging
schedule
DISCUSSION
Staff is requesting the Council approve the quotes and authorize the construction contract with
Kusske Construction Company These ponds are high priority ponds and staff has received
numerous comments on the need to clean these ponds
Braun Intertec sampled each of the ponds included on the map In all cases the ponds were
found to be below the threshold for Soil Resource Value SRV 1 Therefore the excavated pond
sediments may be reused without restrictions
FUNDING
The project is planned to be funded with the Surface Water Management Plan SWMP funds
and was identified in the 2010 CIP SWMP 032 Staffhad budgeted 25 000 from SWMP funds
for the project The proposed road improvement project on Audubon Road has made the need
for adequate storage and treatment of increased importance in this area Because of this need
pond location 7 was included in the base bid This pond is by far the largest pond requiring the
largest volume of sediment removal This pond alone accounts for nearly 60 percent of the
project cost and over 70 percent of the volume of sediment to be removed Staff is
recommending that funding for pond location 7 come out ofthe Fees for Services budget in the
Surface Water Management Fund as this pond would likely not have been included in the
scheduled pond cleanout were it not for the timing ofthe proposed Audubon Road project
G ENG SWMP PROJECTS SWMP18D Pond Maintenance SWMP 18D 09 01 2009 Pond CleanoutlPond Cleanout RFP St ftReport w rdbid 02081O doc 170
Paul Oehme
2010 Pond Cleanout Project
February 8 2010
Page 3
SCHEDULE
If Council authorizes the construction contract the work schedule will be as follows
February 8 2010 A ward Contract at City Council Meeting
February 9 12 2010 Dewater Ponds
February 15 2010 Begin Excavation
March 1 2010 Substantial Completion
May 14 2010 Final Stabilization and Restoration Complete
Attachments Location Map
CIP Page
G ENG SWMP PROJECTS SWMPI8D Pond Maintenance SWMP 18D 09 01 2009 Pond CleanoutlPond Cleanout RFP StafiReporl awardbid 020810 doc 171
b
I
I
J
T
i
I
V
1
J7 vi
ffi
C
1
1
CO
I
11
U
I
I
D
nt
V1J
t
I
tOJ
o
ill
Alf
I
Zl
j j
lj
I
T
iij
I
i
IIltl
R
0
I
JIj
f
t
a
Ff
t
IJl
iJ
y
1
Iii
E
1f 0
if
t
e
QJ
3
i
II
t
I
f
I
LJ
l
ti
IPOWER
I
L
D
V
l
1
R
G
lII
ZtW
jJJ
1Ii
d
W
Zlm
II
I
TC
IR
V
l r
16iBrS
mdl
IJ
B If
j llIrf
A
4i
R
llli ill
Y1ilf
6 i
i1Jl1j
I
a
1l S
ApPEND
h
MAP
A
t
h
hassen
City
of
C
an
Location
Map
tenance
2009
10
Pond
Main
I
N
N
Q J
0
0
11
U
fJ
c
U
0
o
0
3
J
0
0
tI l
ro
0
Ul
lco
o
j
co OJ J
l
5
1
I
172
Capital Improvement Program
City of ChanhasSen MN
2010 thru 2014 Department Surface Water Management
Contact Paul Oehme
Account 1 720 7025 4751
Account 2
Account 3
Type Improvement
Useful Life
Category SWMP
Priority nfa
Project SWMP 032
Project Name Stormwater Pond Improvements
Account 4
Description I Total Project Cost 205 000
This project will provide inspection and cleaning if required of all City stormwater ponds on a rotating four 4 year schedule to identify any
management needs and perform needed repairs and improvements This may include sediment removal placement of blanket rip rap or other
erosion control BMP s vegetation management and assessment repair and replacement of inlet and outlet structures
Justification I
There are over 170 stormwater ponds in the City of Chanhassen all requiring regular maintenance to assure they function to National Urban
Runoff Program recommendations This measure has also been identified in Chanhassen s National Pollution Discharge Elimination Municipal
Separate Storm Sewer System permit
Prior
50 000 I
Total
Expenditures
Construction
2010
35 000
35 000
2011
25 000
25 000
2012
35 000
35 000
2013
25 000
25 000
2014
35 000
35 000
Total
155 000
155 000 Total
Prior Funding Sourc es 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
50 000 I Other Agency Contribution 10 000 10 000 10 000 30 000
Total Surface Water Utility Fund 25 000 25 000 25 000 25 000 25 000 125 000
Total 35 000 25 000 35 000 25 000 35 000 155 000
Budget Impact Other I
This will require an input of other public works staff hours
115
173
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard
PO Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
Administration
Phone 952 227 11 00
Fax 952 227 1110
Building Inspections
Phone 952 227 1180
Fax 952 227 1190
Engineering
Phone 952 227 1160
Fax 952 227 1170
Finance
Phone 952 227 1140
Fax 952 227 1110
Park Recreation
Phone 952 227 1120
Fax 952 227 1110
Recreation Center
2310 Coulter Boulevard
Phone 952 227 1400
Fax 952 227 1404
Planning
Natural Resources
Phone 952 227 1130
Fax 952 227 1110
Public Works
1591 Park Road
Phone 952 227 1300
Fax 952 227 1310
Senior Center
Phone 952 227 1125
Fax 952 227 1110
Web Site
www ci chanhassen mn us
E
MEMORANDUM
TO Paul Oehme Director of Public Works City Engineer 7 7
Alyson Fauske Assistant City Engineer O t FROM
DATE February 8 2010 o
SUBJECT Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easements Lots 4 and 5 Block 1
Brenden Ponds 3rd Addition Planning Case File No 10 01
PROPOSED MOTION
The City Council is recommended to vacate the drainage and utility easements
on Lots 4 and 5 Block 1 Brenden Ponds 3rd Addition as shown on the survey
prepared by Demars Gabriel Land Surveyors Inc dated 12 18 09
Approval is contingent upon combining the lots and recording the Grant of
Permanent Drainage and Utility Easement document
City Council approval requires a simple majority vote of the City Council
present
BACKGROUND
The drainage and utility easements
were granted with the Brenden
Ponds 3rd Addition in 1999 The
drainage and utility easements that
are proposed to be vacated are a
portion of the perimeter easements
and do not contain any public or
private utilities according to
Gopher State One Locates
The applicant owns both lots and
will combine the lots under one tax
parcelID The lots were combined to accommodate the proposed single family
dwelling and future improvements to the lot including a deck and pool The
applicant understands that building permits are required for the proposed
improvements to the property
Chanhassen is a Community for Life Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow 174
Staff originally identified this area for a future
well collection pipe to convey raw water from a
future well on the Minnetonka Middle School
property to the north to the existing well collection
pipe located near the intersection of Lake Harrison
Circle and Lake Lucy Road It is anticipated that
a
the majority of the well collection pipe will be l
directionally bored to minimize disturbance to the 6 vc
t l
existing surface improvements within the project
corridor The alignment of the well collection pipe can be shifted to accommodate the proposed
easement vacation
Paul Oehme
Vacation ofD U Easement Brenden Ponds 3rd
February 8 20 I 0
Page 2
The five foot wide rearyard drainage and utility
easement on Lot 4 and a portion of the five foot
wide drainage and utility easement on the west
side of Lot 5 are proposed to be vacated as
shown
m
i
fJ i4INAG I IJfdlfY
IAS lIi V 10 fif V AifO
LOT
The applicant has agreed to dedicate
additional drainage and utility easements at
the back and east side of Lot 5 to
accommodate the future well collection
pipe The easement document is attached
and will be recorded with the vacation
Attachments
I Application
2 Drawing and legal description of easement vacation
3 Notice of Public Hearing Affidavit of Mailing
4 Grant of Permanent Drainage and Utility Easement To be handed out at City Council Meeting
175
Planning Case No
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard P O Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317 952 227 1100
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION DEe 2 2 2009
PLEASE PRINT
Applicant Name and Address
k t1ltJ t lSCV l C CV s vLtc ho a 1l L
7J X f U S1 V L A t
C V J1 i 14lV S l l
Contact kV d 0 s
Phone ULl b 3 uz Fax crs Z Lll b I b3
Email da lL ge tJ l h pa lll fDVY
ENGINEERING DEP1
Property OW ne r NameifAdd S J
Contact
Phone G Sv 15 JJ 33Z Fax
Email
NOTE Consultation with City staff is reauired prior to submittal including review of development
plans
Conditional Use Permit CUP
Temporary Sales Permit
Vacation of Ri9ht of Wa AC
Additional recording ees may apply
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Interim Use Permit IUP Variance VAR
Non conforming Use Permit Wetland Alteration Permit WAP
Planned Unit Development Zoning Appeal
Rezoning Zoning Ordinance Amendment
Sign Plan Review
Notification Sign 200
City to install and remove
O
S Kc JV d
Sign Permits
X Escrow for Filing Fees Attorney Cost
Site Plan Review SPR 50 CUP SPRNACNARlWAP Metes Bounds
450 Minor SUB 1 I
1 fLC 0
Subdivision TOTAL FEE 3SO
f V ec I 20 D
An additional fee of 3 00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant
prior to the public hearing
Sixteen 16 full size folded copies of the plans must be submitted including an 8 X 11
reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a diaital CODY in TIFF Group 4 tif format
Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract
Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews
NOTE When multiple applications are processed the appropriate fee shall be charged for
each application
176
PROJECT NAME V t1lCli tljy of dv lM tlS e lAJ ll tfiea
LOCAT10N f 1 t rovnev CJt l V fi1CVl d llLtLL ULY la O dt JI C1
LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND PID Lot U S 3 12 n lL bY f den dnd
rl ttcY1
TOTAL ACREAGE Lot q b alt l
WETLANDS PRESENT YES r
J i q nt S bloUL l
NO
PRESENT ZONING
REQUESTED ZONING
ILSf
SlUMe
PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION OLL df1 SI VeSV f Y I Q
REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION t
REASON FOR REQUEST VClc aJlon
FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW Include number of existing employees and new employees
This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information
and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions Before filing this application you should confer with the
Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application
A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal A written
notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application
This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with
all City requirements with regard to this request This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom
the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application I have attached a copy of proof of ownership either copy of Owner s Duplicate Certificate of Title Abstract of Title or purchase agreement or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application
I will keep myself informed of the deadlines fat submission of material and the progress of this application I further
understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees feasibility studies etc with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge
0 i I
Si nt
1 J o 7 Date
Signature of Fee Owner Jo 11c
Date
g plan forms development review application doc
177
EASEMENT VACATION EXHIBIT
o
Droioog E
25 Tree Preservation j I
I Easement I l
1 il
Additlonal 20 of Drainage i
and Utility Eosement I
co
j
2 LOT 5 N
a
I
V rc 5
5
o
o
J
7i 0
t Q7
h
i 1 t
i 9 1P 11 2 f S 9 Y I 9
I 0 69
B
A 0 V
ZB 0 y O DS
Dt
i D C OCi
It 0
02 36
t 1 00
R 4501 9
L B
o
I f 0 65 1 1 5 E
I 520 B N 69 i lZ i
0 S tR
00 Proposed Tree Preservation Eosement S An easement far tree preservation purposes over and
across the northerly 25 00 feet of Lot 5 Block I
Brenden Ponds 3rd Addition
S 89 0 05 E 97 33
PREPARED FOR
GESTACH PAULSON
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOTS 4 5 BLOCK 1
BRENDEN PONDS 3RD ADDITION
ORA NACE UTlL TY
EASEMENT TO BE VACATEO
UNE NOR1KWES1ERL1 B E 1
0 0
S 00 0 1
6 o
N
U
ID
4
OF LO
P
O z
N ID
j
J IDN c P
U
N
LOT 4
o Z
o
C
REVISED 2 01 10 1
REVISm 2 01 10 2
Easement to be Vocated
I
DD O
The drainage and utility easements os dedicated in Block
1 Brenden Ponds 3rd Addition which are described os
follows
Proposed Additional Drainage ond Utility Easement
An easement for drainage and utility purposes over
under and across the southwesterly 10 00 feet of the
northeasterly 15 00 feet of Lat 5 Block 1 Brenden
Ponds 3rd Addition
That part the northeasterly 5 00 feet of Lot 4 and the
southwesterly 5 00 feet of Lot 5 said Block 1 which lie
northwesterly of the southeasterly 10 00 feet of said Block
1 and which lie southeasterly of a line drawn parallel with
and 5 00 feet southeasterly of the northwesterly line of
said Lot 4 and its northeasterly extension
Proposed Additional Drainage and Utility Easement
An easement for drainage and utl lity purposes over
under and ocross the southerly 20 00 feet of the
northerly 25 00 feet of Lot 5 Block 1 Brenden Ponds
Jrd Addition
DEMARS GABRIEL
LAND SURVEYORS me
6875 Washington Ave So
Suite 209
Edina MN 55439
Phone 952 767 0487
Fax 952 767 0490
f hereby certify that this survey pion or report was prepared by me
or under my direct supervision and that I am a dufy Registered Land
Surveyor under the Lows of the Stote of Minnesota
r aL
David E Croak
Date 12 18 09 Minn Reg No 22414
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www pdffactorv com
File No
t 3778 C CER71FICATE
OF SURVEY
Book Page
Scale
1 20
178
Pc 10
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
VACATION OF A PORTION OF DRAINAGE UTILITY EASEMENTS
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen City Council will hold a public
hearing on Monday February 8 2010 at 7 00 p m in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City
Hall 7700 Market Boulevard The purpose of this hearing is to consider the request of Candyce
Fred Penteado for the vacation of a portion of the drainage and utility easements on Lots 4
and 5 Block 1 Brenden Pond 3rd Addition Vacation File No 10 01
A legal description and drawing of the proposed vacation area are available for public
review at City Hall during regular business hours
All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions
with respect to this proposal
Alyson Fauske Assistant City Engineer
Phone 952 227 1164
Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on January 21 2010
SC NNEO
g eng vacations 14 5 b 1 brenden pond 3 pc 10 01 ph notice to paper doc
179
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ss
COUNTY OF CARVER
I Karen J Engelhardt being first duly sworn on oath deposes that she is and was on
January 27 2010 the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City ofChanhassen
Minnesota that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public
Hearing for the Vacation of a Portion of Drainage Utility Easements on Lots 4 and 5
Block 1 Brenden Pond 3rd Addition to the persons named on attached Exhibit A by
enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner and depositing the
envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid
thereon that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the
records ofthe County Treasurer Carver County Minnesota and by other appropriate records
Su scrib d and sworn to b ore me
t aY 2010
Y k i7
Notary Public a
JEAN M STECKLlNG j Notary Public Minnesota
My Commission expires Jan 31 2014
SCANNED
180
Disclaimer
This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one
This map is a compilation of records information and data located in various city county state and
federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown and is to be used for reference
purposes only The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System GIS Data used
to prepare this map are error free and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used
for navigational tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or
direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features If errors or discrepancies are found
please contact 952 227 1164 The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes 9466 03 Subd 21 2000 and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not
be liable for any damages and expressly waives all claims and agrees to defend indemnify and
hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User its emptoyees or agents or third
parties which arise out of the user s access or use of data provided
181
0 c a
0
a
s ro a
0 IS o
0 u
c J a
u
o
c
a
a
u
en en
o
ro Z 2 ro c U 0 c a
o
a
s ro a
0 IS U
0 u
c
J
a
U
o
c
a
a
u
en en
o
ro Z 2 ro c U
0 lD ID x
E
Co
ci 00 00 co
CI oL ID 0 0
C lE
co
ex
c t
co J L
C Q J
a
0 LLt co
co oI c o t
a c
q
C a
L
c QCO JID a
c a x
E
Co
ci 00 00 co
CI oL a 0 0
C lE
co
ex
c t
co J L
C Q J
a
0 LLt co
co OI c
0
t
a c CI
a
C a
L
c QCO Ja o
c
o
C
I
0
0
0
CI
a
co
U
o O
ijo
O
0
cZ
u
l
a
co
r
L
J
I
OLL
OO
a
a
CCI
OCl
0 C
C
co
co
a
ot
Ul
tQ
ta531 OCOL O
a
c
0
C I
C
COCCOC l
co2
lDCI
o
a
C
1
r
CIa OCl
a
5 x
l
Ot
o
co
ca
a
0
L
C
lD
Co
COELLa
co
ID
gLCiE
a
15
w
lD t
ij
0
Z
0
0
CJ
o
C I
o
L
co
o
a
J
t
c o
2
co CI o a e a
0 cCi5cco co
CI
0
CI
a
o
0
0
co
0
0
0
e 3a 1
0
J
0
O
cL
cL
CI
ffi 0
0
c
o
0
1
ID
0
a
a
c
cCii o
c
0
L
CI
J
eo
000
CI
0
0
0
a
ID
CI
cO c
a
O
L
c
1
j
0
0
S
C
ID
co
O
ID
ID 5a
c
c
0
C
CI
co
o
ar
a
COL
ID
L
0
a
ca
OCl
C
C a
c
0
E
co
0
0
i
g
E
a
c
o
C
0
a
0
1
0
co
c
e
c
a
5
a
0
0
0
0
g
9
c
ci
C
l
C
2
C
O
0
c
oC
a
O 5
J Ja
c
E
2 0
0
1
a E
0
co
ID
co
m
CI
0
J
CI
a
0
ID
0
co
co
c
0
L
ID
5
0 5
5
co
C 0
co
co c
5
lD
o I o
a 0
0 z a
e OLL ID
o
CI
C
co
o
t tQJ o
C
0
a
c
0
co
C
co CO2
o
a
C
C
I
a
OCl
a
1
0
co
a
ID L
co
ELL ID
O
a
a Cl
W
8
O
0
C
L
co
a
Jt
0
C
ID
O
o
c
ID
c
Co
O
CI
CI
c
co
a
co
0
0
0
c
o Oo
o
0
0
l
1
ID
O
a
c
E
g
r
co
OOVla
J
L
0
OoCl
a
oa
a
IDC
a
a
CI
a
e 5
0
c
c
1
a
0
7
co
a
a
CUl JL
ca
co
tID31g
ID 5
L
0
i
0
c
C
CI
C I
C
X
o
9
C lIDCI
a
a
L
O
ID
coCl
lD
CI
C
C
a
1
5
a
c
0
E
co
0
J
l
O
0
0
i
0
E
o x
oa
c
a
c
C
0
0
o
0
1
0
co
c
C
lD
Co
e
C
a
c
a
0
0
co
0
0
g
9
c
ci
a
C
L
E
C
L
C
2
c
C
a
s
l
0
co
5
L
IV
0
a
7
Q
C
a
N
J J
J
c
t ij
E2 o
a
1
a
0
0
CI
B
co
ID
co
co
ft
0
E
J
I
0
CI
a
a
0
0
coco
ca
L
c o2
a
5
0 5
5
co CI o 0 e a
0 cCi5cco co
CI
0
CI
a
o
0
0
co
a
0
0
e 3a
co
C 0
co
co c
5
I
0
ci
C I
ca
0
c
C J
CI
2
N
CI
a
O
C I
J
C
a
c
J
L
C
co
a
CI
Jc 5
t
oO E
c
ffi
a
C
Q
0
L
0
l
5
c
5
0
5
co
c
E
co
0
15
a
a
J0
Ec a
a
oC
L
c
0
a
C
co x
CI
J
CI
6
C
a
Q J
0
CI
CI
CI
0
a
o
C
c
a
0
C
J
co
0
0
0
o
cCl
co
oco c
o
Jg
co
E
a
co
LLffi c
C
0
0
J
a
I
C
c
ID
C
E
ffi
g
e
E
0 Q
a
0
0
a
ID
l1l
c
E
a
a
C
a
a
@
0
0
e
E
0
CI
0
c
0
ID
CI
S
0
jg
a
j
0
Q
I
x
C
0
N
0
19
CI
Q
c
Q
co
CI
co
Q
0
0
C
J
en
E
E
a
S
en
8
ID
15
s
O
a
a
a
co Jco
al
E
C
CO
c
CI
E
a
C
a
CI
CI
Co
9COcci
CO
o
l
n
1
a
CI
ID
E
C
0
I
is
a
a
c
5
8
I
co
CI
C
C
a
E
CI
a
ID
a
c
3
co
J
0
ex
ID
a
0
a
E
c
c
C
0
co
E
ID
u
rJl
c
o JCJ
J i
m
c
Ec
CI
t
a
O
g
J
Q
c o
J
E
ID
5
g
E
0
0
O c
L
c o
ex
c
LL
1ll s 2 n is rJl 0 CD o Z
cn C
g
a
ID
co
o
c
a
c
0
Q
5
roE
cn2 C
C
o
ID E E
J
0 at I
0
C I
cQ
cC JCI
CI
a
0
C I
J
C
ID
c
J
L
C
co
a
cn Jc
5
t
oO E
c
ffi
a
C
a
0
1
0
l
JID CC
o
cocEcoo
ffi
C
L
J
E
C
a
a
0
5
R
a
C
co x
cn J
CI
6
C
a
Q J
0
CI
cn
CI
6
ID
o
C
c
a
co
0
Co
0
0
0
o
Ccncn
LLC oO
Jg
co
E
a
oco
co c
C
0
g
0
I
C
c
ID
a
E
co
Q
e
E
0 Q
gj
Q
0
0
0
a
l1l
c
E
a
a
C
ID
o
@
o O
e
8
cno
Q
c
6
ID
S
a
s
a
Q
x
0
N
o
19
CI
Q
c
5
coE
co
9
0
Co
en
a
s
E
a
cn
Q
CI
0
ID
Q
ID
co
J
co
co
al
E
C
CO
c
CI
E
a
C
a
en
cn
Co
9
co
cci
co
5
I
n
C
a
cn
ID
ID
E
C
0
is
5
a
c
5
8
I
co
cn
C
C
o
E
cn
a
ID
ID1
3
co
J
0
ex
L
a
ID
0
ID
E c
c
C
0
co
E
ID
u
rJl
c
O J
cn J
CO t
c
E
cjg
CI
t
a
o
g
J Q
c o
J
E
ID
5
g
EO
0
O c
C I
I
t
c
LL
1ll s 2 n is rJl s 0 CD o g Z ci o N
cn c
g
a
ID
co
o
c
ID
c
0
ID
5
roE
cn2 c
C
o
ID E E
J
0 at
182
ALFREDO L PENTEADO III
CANDYCE J PENTEADO
100011NDEGO DR
EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 1205
CLEONE B FOSTER
2275 LAKE LUCY RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 6706
DANE S LISA 0 DOESCHER
6732 BRENDEN CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7570
ERIC M PATRICIA E BURDON
6690 BRENDEN CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7560
JOSEPH R COOK KATHLEEN L
HUNTINGTON
6672 BRENDEN CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7560
MARVIN P BARBARA A MILLER
2340 LAKE LUCY RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7561
MICHAEL E ANNE M RYAN
2595 SOUTHERN CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7547
ANG C NHI T KY
6729 BRENDEN CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7570
THOMAS MARY KUHN
6693 BRENDEN CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7560
WILLIAM 0 KRISTEN K FLANAGAN
6653 BRENDEN CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7560
BRUCE SALLY BARQUIST
2360 LAKE LUCY RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7561
CURTIS W NOELLE W SWENSON
6614 ALDER WAY
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 4581
DANIEL C JANE A MCKOWN
2171 PINEHURST DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 4579
HERBERT M DONNA M HILLMAN
6716 BRENDEN CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7570
KENNETH F KRISTEN L THATCHER
2219 LAKE LUCY RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 6706
MARY ANN OLSON
2249 LAKE LUCY RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 6706
MICHAEL L AMY C DEGENEFFE
6654 BRENDEN CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7560
STEPHEN J LAURIE A KERKVLlET
2201 LAKE LUCY RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 6706
TONKA DEVELOPMENT LLC ATTN
MARY
18001 HIGHWAY 7
MINNETGNKA MN 55345 4150
ZHIJUN WANG YOUFEI WU
2237 LAKE LUCY RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 6706
BRUCE S HELEN TERESA SMITH
9 HAWKINS DR
NORTHPORT NY 11768 1527
DAN V CYNTHIA M SEEMAN
6673 BRENDEN CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7560
DON W CHRISTINE A ANTHONY
6700 BRENDEN CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7570
JOHN G II BARBARA K JACOBSON
6719 BRENDEN CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7570
KIMBERLY K GOERS
6709 BRENDEN CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7570
MICHAEL 0 DEBRA H ANDERSON
6681 AMBERWOOD LN
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 4582
PLOWSHARES DEVELOPMENT LLC
1851 WEST LAKE DR 550
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8567
STEPHEN M HEATHER L PINT
6750 BRENDEN CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7570
TROY A BADER GINA SAUER
2244 LAKE LUCY RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 6706
183
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard
PO Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
Administration
Phone 952 227 1100
Fax 952 227 1110
Building Inspections
Phone 952 227 1180
Fax 952 227 1190
Engineering
Phone 952 227 1160
Fax 952 227 1170
Finance
Phone 952 227 1140
Fax 952 227 1110
Park Recreation
Phone 952 227 1120
Fax 952 227 1110
Recreation Center
2310 Coulter Boulevard
Phone 952 227 1400
Fax 952 227 1404
Planning
Natural Resources
Phone 952 227 1130
Fax 952 227 1110
Public Works
1591 Park Road
Phone 952 227 1300
Fax 952 227 1310
Senior Center
Phone 952 227 1125
Fax 952 227 1110
Web Site
www ci chanhassen mn us
Lf
MEMORANDUM
j
TO Paul Oehme Director of Public Works City Engineer
FROM Alyson Fauske Assistant City Engineer Q
DATE February 8 2010 ok
SUBJECT Audubon Road Reconstruction Project No 10 02 Public Hearing
Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications
PROPOSED MOTION
The City Council is recommended to hold the public hearing for the Audubon
Road Reconstruction Project No 10 02 and authorize the preparation of plans
and specifications
City Council approval requires a simple majority vote of the City Council
present
BACKGROUND
On July 13 2009 staff discussed the proposed 2010 street reconstruction projects with
the City Council at the work session
On August 10 2009 City Council awarded the preliminary design consultant contract
to SRF Consulting Group Inc SRF
A neighborhood open house was held December 2 2009 to discuss the project with
the property owners that are proposed to be assessed
An open house for the neighborhood was held on January 13 2010
SCOPE OF PROJECT
Street Improvements
Audubon Road from Lake Drive West to Lyman Boulevard CSAH 18 is a
municipal collector roadway and is proposed to be reconstructed this year The
pavement is in poor condition and shows severe pavement distress The average
pavement condition indices PCI range from 17 to 40 with the average being 31 a
road at 45 PCI typically indicates distress that would require a full depth
reconstruction The roadway is a rural section with gravel shoulders The gravel
shoulders on the hill washout frequently and become a hazard to the traveling public
The shoulders are also a maintenance concern for staff The proposed urbanization of
the street and the storm sewer installation will eliminate this problem
Chanhassen is a Community for life Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow 184
Paul Oehme
Audubon Road Reconstruction Project
February 8 2010
Page 2
Audubon Road is proposed to be urbanized and turn lanes added for safety The corridor is not
proposed to be widened but improved to about the current width of the pavement section when the
gravel shoulders are included Most intersections already have substandard right turn lanes Left
turn lanes are proposed to be added at most intersections A common center left turn lane is
proposed to be added at the south end of the corridor for residential driveway access Turn lanes
would be expensive to install in the future iftraffic problems were to increase The traveled thru
lanes are proposed to be 14 wide in most areas and 12 wide at some intersections Staffis
proposing to keep the width of the thru lanes narroW as a traffic calming technique The intersection
at Valley Ridge Trail North OspreyLane is proposed to be 52 feet to accommodate the left turn
lanes and right turn lane improvements This intersection is currently 48 wide
Trail Improvements
A 10 foot wide trail is proposed to be extended on the west side of Audubon Road from Valley
Ridge Trail North to Lyman Boulevard The trail is proposed to be off road and in back of the curb
for safety considerations The Parks Department Trail Comprehensive Plan identifies this trail as an
important connection The trail s anticipated use may include recreation transportation a non
motorized route for workplace commuting and a training route for high school athletic teams
Completion of this trail will allow residents in the area the opportunity to create looping routes for
their walks and other trail recreation activities Looping routes are much preferred over out and
back routes The trail will also connect to the future trial on Lyman Boulevard east of Audubon
Road
Staff has looked at the pros and cons to construct the trail on both sides of Audubon Road and is
recommending the trail be constructed on the west side If the trail would be extended on the east
side a significant stand of mature trees would need to be removed extensive grading would be
necessary and a retaining wall would need to be constructed A driveway would also need to be
relocated or replaced to accommodate the trail Additional permanent easements would also be
required Installing the trail on the west side of the road utilizes a superior trail corridor requires
significantly less financial investment and puts the trail on the side of the road with the densest
residential development These residents will benefit by being afforded a second convenient access
to the City s trail system the first being the connection to the Bluff Creek Trail
An at grade pedestrian trail crossing is proposed at the Valley Ridge Trail North Osprey Lane
intersection Other pedestrian crossing locations were also evaluated however the Valley Ridge
Trail North crossing location appears to be the best location because it
Provides the best trail connectivity in particular to the north
Is anticipated to be were most pedestrians would want to cross based on destination
Offers the best sight lines for vehicles to see the crossing
If sufficient pedestrian traffic exists a mid block crossing location with refuge island could be
considered in the future Depending on the actual pedestrian routes future consideration could be
given to a crosswalk being located on the south side of Heron Drive since it is shadowed by the
southbound left turn lane Also it is legal for pedestrians to cross at any intersection with either a
g eng public 201O proj ects 1 0 02 audubon road imp 02 08 10 public hearing docx
185
Paul Oehme
Audubon Road Reconstruction Project
February 8 2010
Page 3
marked or unmarked crosswalk If residents feel more comfortable crossing at another intersection
they can cross at a different location
A small area of land will need to be acquired at the south end of Audubon Road to accommodate the
trail Most of the acquisition is planned to be temporary construction easements The appraisals for
the property are almost complete Some small trees and brush will need to be removed Staff will
work with the property owners on a landscape plan as part of this project
Storm Water Management
The pond on the south side of Lyman Boulevard was oversized in conjunction with the Lyman
Boulevard reconstruction project to treat the runoff from the southern of this segment of Audubon
Road A storm sewer pipe was stubbed to the north side of Lyman Boulevard for the future
reconstruction of Audubon Road The oversizing was designed based on Audubon Road being
reconstructed to a 44 foot wide road Runoff from the northern l4 of the project area is proposed to
be treated in the existing storm water pond on the southeast comer of Lake Drive West and Audubon
Road A new storm sewer pipe outlet will be needed to this pond The City has an easement over
this pond so no additional easements are anticipated Curb and gutter is proposed to be added for
safety due to the proposed trail on the back side of the curb and to direct the roadway runoff to the
catch basins
A box culvert for Bluff Creek is located at the southern end of the project area to convey flow under
Audubon Road SRF reviewed the existing structural integrity of the box culvert and determined
that it is in good condition The box culvert must be extended in conjunction with the trail
construction The proposed location of the box culvert extension is under a drainage and utility
easement
Utility Improvements
A 12 inch diameter trunk watermain is within the western right of way of Audubon Road There are
no records ofwatermain breaks in the project area The gate valve and hydrant bolts within the
corridor are proposed to be replaced Some hydrants will need to be relocated in conjunction with
this project Water services are proposed to be extended to properties along Audubon Road that do
not already have water service These improvements are proposed at this time because it would be
more cost effective to make these improvements at the time the road is being reconstructed The
water service extension is proposed to be assessed back to the benefiting property owners as an
optional improvement The estimated cost for this improvement is 1 175 unit
A sanitary forcemain exists under this portion of Audubon Road The gate valve bolts to the
forcemain are proposed to be replaced The gravity sanitary sewer within the project corridor has
been televised and appears to be in good condition therefore no sanitary sewer improvements are
proposed
g eng public OlO projects lO 02 audubon road imp 02 08 1O public hearing docx
186
Paul Oehme
Audubon Road Reconstruction Project
February 8 2010
Page 4
Private Utilities
The electric telephone and cable lines are overhead through most of the project corridor Due to the
capacity of the electrical lines Xcel has indicated power lines cannot be buried It is anticipated
many ofthe utility poles would need to be relocated with this project Staff does not have a plan
from Xcel at this time if and where the poles will be moved
A petroleum pipeline crosses under Audubon Road near Valley Ridge Trail South The road is
proposed to be lowered approximately li foot at this location Staff has been in contact with this
utility company regarding this project
Street Lighting
Additional intersection street lights are proposed at the Osprey Lane Valley Ridge Trail South and
Sunridge Court for safety No additional street lights are proposed along the corridor at this time
Residential Feedback and Concerns
A neighborhood open house for the residents proposed to be assessed was held on December 2
2009 Approximately 12 residents representing seven properties attended The following
summarizes the residents questions issues
Audubon Road is a neighborhood road and should not be constructed as proposed
Why is the road proposed to be widened Can t it remain the existing width
The speed limit is too high Can it be lowered
Why is the City proposing a trail from Valley Ridge Trail North to Lyman Boulevard
Why is the trail proposed on the west side
Can the proposed pedestrian trail be moved to another location
Who will maintain the trail and pick up the trash
What is the traffic volume
There is too much truck traffic is on Audubon Road Can trucks be prohibited
We want an all way stop at the Valley Ridge Trail North Osprey Lane intersection
Will trees be removed
Will street lights be installed
Will a traffic light be installed at the Lyman Boulevard intersection
Will I have access to my property during construction
Can the overhead utilities be buried
A second open house was held on January 13 2010 Notices were mailed to residents of the Valley
Ridge neighborhood and property owners adjacent to the project corridor An ad was placed in the
Chanhassen Villager inviting the general public to the open house Approximately 40 or 50
residents attended The concerns were similar to those brought up at the December 2 2009 open
house A project summary sheet with common questions and staff comments to the questions were
distributed at the January 13 2010 meeting and is also attached to this background This
information is also posted on the City s website
g eng public 2010 projects lO 02 audubon road imp 02 08 10 public hearing docx
187
Paul Oehme
Audubon Road Reconstruction Project
February 8 2010
Page 5
The two biggest concerns staff heard from the residents was the posted speed limit is too high and
the amount of truck traffic The speed of Audubon Road is posted 45 mph and is not planned to
change The Minnesota Department of Transportation sets the speed limits for public streets which
is stated in Minnesota State Statue 169 14 It is unlikely the State of Minnesota would lower the
speed limit because this corridor would not meet the requirements for lowering the speed limit Staff
has met with State officials to discuss this issue and the State indicated it would need to follow its
guidelines in this situation If Audubon Road is reconstructed staff will be taking additional speed
counts to document any changes Audubon Road is a MSA Municipal State Aid route and truck
traffic is accommodated on these types of roadways The 2030 Comprehensive Plan designates
Audubon Road as a collector roadway There is no way to completely stop truck traffic from
accessing this route due to the configuration of the road State Statue 169 80 and 169 87 stipulate
the truck load requirements for roadways Minnesota Department of Transportation Technical
Memorandum No 94 SA 11 clarifies the statues which states cities cannot restrict truck traffic on
roadways that meet design standards Staff took traffic counts on August 10 2009 which indicate
3 of the traffic is made up of 3 axle vehicles or larger Staff could contact the businesses along
Audubon Road to discuss truck routes and traffic
PROPOSED FUNDING AND ESTIMATED ASSESSMENTS
The estimated costs for the Audubon Street Reconstruction Project No 10 02 from Lake Drive West
to Lyman Boulevard are 2 760 000 A 15 construction contingency 15 for indirect costs and
estimated inflation are included in the estimate
Special assessments to the benefitting properties are proposed to pay for a portion of the street costs
associated with this project The remaining street costs are proposed to be paid from the sale of
municipal bonds The preliminary funding is as follows
Funding Source
Sale of Municipal Bonds
Street Assessments
Water Service Assessments
Amount
2 703 765
50 360
5 875
2 760 000
The proposed Audubon Road reconstruction project is unique in that the proposed street is wider
than a typical residential road and driveway access to Audubon Road is limited due to the higher
traffic volumes and speed This results in a higher street reconstruction cost and fewer benefitting
properties than a typical street reconstruction project This issue is however no different than other
streets the City has recently reconstructed Examples of other streets the City has reconstructed that
were wider than the typical residential street are Laredo Drive W 78th Street and Lake Lucy Road
To compensate for this difference and to be consistent with past reconstruction project assessment
methodology staff proposes the following
1 The amount to be assessed is based on a 31 foot wide street and
2 The number of benefitting units assumes 90 foot wide lots on both sides of Audubon Road
8 500 frontage feet 90 front feet benefitting unit 94 4 benefitting units
g eng public 2010 projects 1O 02 audubon road imp 02 08 10 public hearing docx
188
Paul Oehme
Audubon Road Reconstruction Project
February 8 2010
Page 6
The following graphic illustrates the proposed assessment methodology and estimated unit
assessment
If Audubon Road were a
local street there would
be 90 wide lots on each
side of the road
This section of Total Estimated Project Cost
Audubon Road is
4 250 feet long or 2 60 OOO
8 500 frontage feet
I Estimated Cost 31 wide road Oversizing Cost Paid
1 485 600
by City
8 09f ontage feet 1 274 400
90 frontage feet unit
94 4 assessment units 40 typically 60 Paid by City assessed
594 240 891 360
594 240 94 4 Total amount Amount paid by the City assessment units
6 295 unit assessed
594 240 50 360
6 295 x 8 units
543 880 50 360
Total Amount Paid by the City
1 274 400 891 360 543 880
2 709 640
SCHEDULE
The anticipated project schedule is as follows
Approve Plans Specifications Auth Ad for Bids
Bid Opening
Neighborhood Meeting
Assessment Hearings Award Contract
Start Construction
Substantial Construction Complete
Final Wear Course Complete
March 8 2010
April 2010
April 2010
May 2010
May 2010
August 27 2010
June 2011
g eng public 20 I 0 projects 1 0 02 audubon road imp 02 08 1 0 public hearing docx
189
Paul Oehme
Audubon Road Reconstruction Project
February 8 2010
Page 7
Public hearing notices have been mailed to property owners
Attachments 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
eIP Page
Preliminary Assessment Roll
Project Information Summary
Location Map
MnDOT Speed Limit Information Sheet
Resolution
Affidavit of Mailing
g eng public 2010 projects IO 02 audubon road imp 02 08 10 public hearing docx
190
Capital Improvement Program
City of Chanhassen MN
ST 022
2010 thru 2014 Department Street Improvements
Contact Paul Oehme
Type Improvement
Useful Life
Category Streets Highways
Priority n1a
Project
Project Name Audubon Street Project
Account 1 Account 3
Account 2 Account 4
Description
Annual project to rehabilitate and reconstruct streets in the City
Total Project Cost 3 000 000
2010 Audubon Road Lyman Blvd to Lake Drive West
Justification
The City uses a Pavement Management System to monitor the condition of the City streets While proper preventative maintenance extends the
life of the street and is cost effective a street will eventually deteriorate to a point that further maintenance is no longer cost effective
Rehabilitation projects extend the life of the street In cases with utility or poor sub grade needs to be replaced or where streets have deteriorated
to a point where rehabilitation will no longer be practical reconstruction of the street is necessary A feasibility study is written to consider the
merits of the project and scope of work
Expenditures
Construction
2010
3 000 000
Total 3 000 000
2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
3 000 000
3 000 000
Funding Sourc s
GO Bonds
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
3 000 000
3 000 000 Total
3 000 000
3 000 000
Budget Impact Other
This project may decrease maintenance costs
103
191
N Q e o c o
O
J
a C
III
cu
lS
E
U
III
cu
III
a
cu
D
III 2
c o
c
g g to
E
0
I
0 E
Z tilU IU
E I
t IU
0
Z
IU
E
I
I
0
i
ffi
lfi IU E z 0
u l
Zo
0 E
00000000 00000000 ci
n
n
ci
ci
n
ci
ci
gJro
gJ
r
ID
I S
I S
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
Lfl
Lfl
Lfl
Lfl
Lfl
Lfl
Lfl
Lfl
en
en
0
en
en
en
en
en
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Z
uS
a
to
f Ii
D
0
cD
cD
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
o E
o
0
o
0
I
n
vi
i
i
t I
t I
o
0
o
0 n n
i
i
i
i
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V z o
Z
0
o o
Ii I Iii
I
IU
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
I
UJ
1 1
1
I
UJ
UJ
I
UJ
i i
i i
i i
i i
i i
Z
Z
Z
ZOO
Z
u
0000ii
ii
0tt
ill 9
I
i
I
Q Q UJ t I
00000000 a
ex
ex
ex
ex
a
ex
ex zzzzzzzz 00000000 c c
co
co
c c
o
000
0
000
1 1
1 10000 lYllYlLflqLflOLflq 00
00
en
en
en
00
1 0
co
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
IU Z
0
0
UJ
0
Z
UJ
0
Z
UJ
Z
0
a
Ii
i
Z
Vl
Ii Zex
00
0
l
0
I
Z
2
J
ex
I
UJ
0
0
UJ
o
z
0
2
3ex
zex
z5
r5
Q
0c j
02c j
UVl
c jO
o
u
uJ
It
l
O
ii
I
0
a
Z
ii
J
2
z
0
U
ex
i
c c
0
Vl
Q ii
000000 10
OOlYl l
lNN i
Lfl
1 0
1 0
ID
0
0
0
0 00000000 NNNNLIlOOOOLfl NNNNNOON oooocoCOQO i
1 1 I
Lfl
Lfl
1 1 I
1 1 I
0
Lfl
Lfl NNNNNNNN I
N
IV
q
Lfl
1 0
QO
o o vi to c IS LO V o o ci 1 0 to o LO V o o LI i 00 0 V
i I
O l g t l N l 192
CITY PROJECT 10 02 AUDUBON ROAD RECONSTRUCTION Lake Drive to Lyman Boulevard
Project Information
The project would reconstruct Audubon Road from Lake Drive West to Lyman Boulevard
The proposal includes the installation of turn lanes concrete curb and gutter and storm
sewer Intersection lighting is planned as a safety improvement A 1 O foot wide bituminous
trail is proposed to be constructed on the west side from Valley Ridge Trail North to Lyman
Boulevard
General Questions Received About the Project
1 Will Audubon Road be wider
In most segments of the roadway the proposed design will be about the same width as the
current width when the gravel shoulder is included Proposed left turn lanes at some
intersections would increase the width
2 Why is the City proposing a trail on this segment of road
The trail on Audubon is proposed for construction to complete an important missing link in the
Cities Trail System The 2030 Comprehensive plan identifies this segment as a key pedestrian
connector within the community Upon completion anticipated uses include recreation
transportation a non motorized route for workplace commuting and a training route for high
school athletic teams Completion of this trail will allow residents in the area the opportunity
to create looping routes for their walks and other trail recreation activities Looping routes are
much preferred over out and back routes
3 Why is the City proposing to construct the trail on the west side of Audubon Road when the trail
is stubbed on the east side
Several factors have lead to this recommendation If the trail would be extended on the east a
significant stand of mature trees would need to be removed extensive grading would be
necessary and a retaining wall would need to be constructed A driveway would also need to
be relocated or replaced to accommodate the trail Additional permanent easement would also
be required Installing the trail on the west side of the road utilizes a superior trail corridor
requires significantly less fmancial investment and puts the trail on the side of the road with the
densest residential development These residents will benefit by being afforded a second
convenient access to the Cities trail system The first being the connection to the Bluff Creek
Trail
4 Can the Audubon Road pedestrian trail crossing at Valley Ridge North be moved to Valley
Ridge South
Valley View Ridge Trail North
Provides the best trail connectivity in particular to the north
Minimizes pedestrian travel to cross Audubon Road
Good sight lines f r vehicles to see the crossing
Pedestrians have a wider roadway to cross through and turn lanes
Valley View Trail South
193
Crossing on the north side would provide a pedestrian refuge shadowed by the northbound
left turn lane
Less pavement for pedestrians to cross
Additional construction costs and private property acquisition
Concern about sight lines driver s ability to see the crossing
It is legal for pedestrians to cross at any intersection with either a marked or unmarked
crosswalk
Recommendations
The proposed crosswalk location at Valley Ridge Trail North provides the best trail
connectivity and travel distance
If sufficient pedestrian traffic exists a mid block crossing location with refuge island could be
considered in the future due to the vehicular speeds
Depending on the actual pedestrian routes future consideration could be given to a crosswalk
being located on the south side of Heron Drive since it is shadowed by the southbound left
turn lane
5 Who will maintain the area around the trail and pick up the trash if the trail is constructed
The Cities Trail System is maintained by our Public Works Division Maintenance activities
include mowing sweeping and snow removal The City coordinates trash collection along
roads through local volunteers community service workers and sentenced to service workers
6 Does the City know how much vehicle traffic uses Audubon Road
Traffic counts were taken by the city on August 10 2009 and show 3 200 trips per day The
state counts for 2009 show 2 900 trips per day
7 How much truck traffic is on Audubon Road
The August 10 2009 traffic counts that were taken indicate 3 of the traffic is made up of3
axle vehicles or large
8 Can truck traffic be discouraged from using Audubon Road south of Lake Drive West
Audubon Road is a MSA Municipal State Aid route and truck traffic is accommodated on
these types of roadways The 2030 comprehensive plan designates Audubon Road as a
collector Roadway There is no way to completely stop truck traffic from accessing this route
do to the configuration of the road
Some solutions may include
1 Provide a more convenient route for the truck traffic Logistically businesses are going
to select the shortest fastest routes to transport their goods
ii Staff could contact the businesses to discuss truck routes
194
9 Can stop signs be installed at all the intersections
All way stop control warrants are found in the MnMUTCD Minnesota Manual of Uniform Traffic
Control Devices While there are several criteria the main criteria include safety and operations of
the intersection In this situation the following can warrant All Way stop control
Four crashes within a 12 month period which would be correctable by all way stop control right
turn left turn and right angle crashes
Minimum Traffic Volumes
o 210 vehicles per hour on Audubon Road for eight hours and 140 vehicles per hour on the cross
street for the same hours
Other criteria as determined in an engineering study sight distance etc
Crash data was reviewed for the past five years The following are the number of reported crashes in
the Mn DOT database
Lake Drive 3 crashes three right angle all were property damage only
Huron Drive 2 crashes one rear end property damage only one ran off road non incapacitating
injury
Valley Ridge Trail North 1 crash ran off road property damage only
Valley Ridge Trail South 0 crashes
Sunridge Court 0 crashes
Unwarranted All Way Stop Control
Unwarranted installation can actually cause more safety and operational problems even though
done with good intebsions The following are some findings from studies about installing
unwarranted A11 Way Stop Control
All Way Stops do not control speeds In fact speeds typical increase away from the intersection
Other elements should be considered to calm traffic speed if that is the real concern
Stop compliance is poor at unwarranted all way stop control intersections
Safety of pedestrians can actually decrease because pedestrians expect vehicles to stop while
vehicles become accustomed to running the unnecessary unwarranted stop sign because they
never stop for cross street traffic
J 1e city may incur high li bility exposure by violating the MnMUTCD
Recommendations
Based on the MnMUTCD none of the intersections in the project area are recommended be
controlled by all way stop control
In the future at the Lake Drive West intersection could have improvements made to calm the traffic
in this area if warranted
195
10 Will trees need to be removed
A few trees will need to be removed along the corridor especially in the temporary easement
locations at the south end of the project Trees will be replanted in the temporary easement
locations
11 Will street lights be added along Audubon Road
Additional intersection street lights are proposed at the Osprey Valley Ridge Trail South and
Sunridge Court for safety
12 Will I have access to my property during construction
Access will be provided to your property during construction Audubon road however will be
closed to through or none local traffic
13 Can the overhead utilities be buried
a Xcel has indicated that the utility power lines cannot be buried because of the size of the line
The power poles may need to be relocated
14 Proposed Project Schedule
of School June 10
196
197
198
x
LEGEND
PAVED ROADWAY
PAVED SHOULDER
DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE
RAISED MEDIANS CURBS
BITUMINOUS TRAILS
CONCRETE TRAILS SIDEWALKS
FUTURE CONSTRUCTION BY OTHERS
PROPOSED PONDING LOCATION
ACCESS CLOSURE
EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY
PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY
CONSTRUCTION UMITS
50 0
scale
50
I
feet
199
SPEED
LIMIT
9
What are the Legal Speed Limits
j MN Statute 169 14
Speed laws are created for the protection of
bthe public and the curbing of unreasonable
ehavior To effectively enforce a law the
public must believe that the law is
reasonable Minnesota s speed regulations are based on the
same Basic Speed Law that is used in all 50 states No
pers n shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater
than IS reasonable and prudent under the conditions
Statutory limits are based on the concept that uniform
categories of highways can operate safely at certain preset
a iI um speeds under ideal conditions Whether the speed
hmlt IS posted or unposted drivers are required to reduce
speed below these values for poor weather conditions curves
or hills and potential hazards such as pedestrians D ivers
must also reduce speed when approaching or passing
emergency vehicles with emergency lights flashing
These are the most common statutory speeds
J 10 mph in alleys
J 30 mph on streets in urban districts
J 70 mph on rural interstate highways
J 65 mph on urban interstate highways
J 65 mph on expressways
J 55 mph on other roads
Whenever these statutory speed limits are not the correct
value for a specific highway the commissioner of
transportation authorizes the posting of other regulatory
speed limits
JfIa
Interstates are high design multi lane divided highways
that have controlled access interchanges such as cloverleafs
or diamond shaped interchanges Through traffic on the
Interstate never has to stop or yield Examples 1 94 or 1 35
Expressways are multi lane divided highways but they
have e tries and inter ections sometimes controlled by
traffic signals Some Interchanges may exist but they are
not the ruie Examples Highway 10 or Highway 52
How Does Mn DOT
Determine the Regulatory Speed Limit
h commissioner of transportation sets regulatory speed
hmlts on state and local roads based on a thorough
engineering and traffic investigation
These factors are considered
J road type and condition
J location and type of access points intersections
entrances etc
J sufficient length of roadway 1 4 mile minimum
J existing traffic control devices signs signals etc
J crash history
J traffic volume
J sight distances curve hiIl etc
J test drive results
J speed study
The most important part of the traffic investigation is the
speed study When choosing a speed drivers take many
roadway environment factors into consideration Therefore
the speed that the majority of people consider prudent is an
important value Data is collected by perfom1ing radar
checks at selected locations on the roadway under ideal
driving conditions A technical analysis is done on the results
to determine the 85th percentile This is the value indicating
the speed at which most 85 drivers are traveling under
Experience has shown that a posted speed limit near this
value is the maximum safe and reasonable speed Studies
have shown that traveling much faster or slower than this
value can increase your chance of being in a crash
Engineering judgement is an important tool The traffic
investigator must use knowledge of nationally accepted
principles combined with experience to assign the safe speed
NESOr 1 11 August 2002
Minnesota Department of Transportation
1 0 Office of Traffic Engineering jf Intelligent Transportation Systems
r OF Tl
M J Minn 4 www dot state mn us trafficeng
200
What are the Types of Speed Limits
REGULATORY SPEED LIMIT SIGN
SPEED
LIMIT
50
This black and white sign shows the maximum speed
that a motorist may travel under ideal conditions It
can be a statutory value or else it must be authorized
by the commissioner of transportation
ADVISORY SPEED SIGN
This black and yellow speed sign is used to advise
motorists of a comfortable speed to navigate certain
situations It is used with a warning sign For
instance when traveling on a winding road the curve
1251 warning sign would be used with an advisory speed
sign This sign may be posted by the local road
MPH authority on local roads
SPEED LIMITS IN SCHOOL ZONES
ISCHooL
SPEED
LIMIT
20
I al
Local authorities may establish school speed limits on
local streets within a school zone upon the basis of
an engineering and traffic investigation as prescribed
by the commissioner of transportation This
regulatory speed limit is in effect whenever children
are present such as before and after school or during
recess The school plate is black and yellow and the
other signs are black and white Optional flourescent
yellow green may be used for the school plate
SPEED LIMITS IN WORK ZONES
SPEED
LIMIT
40
SPEED
LIMIT
5Q
Advisory speed limits are used to identify safe speeds
for specific conditions within a work zone These
black and orange signs are always used with warning
signs The local road authority can post these plates in
work zones on local roads
Work zone speed limits are short term regulatory
speed limits that are established for worker safety due
to traffic in adjacent lanes These speed limits range
from 20 mph to 40 mph on two lane two way roads
and up to 55 mph on divided highways They can be
posted by the local road authority in active work zones
on local roads The FINES DOUBLE plate is black
and orange and the speed limit sign is black and white
Temporary speed limits in construction zones are
sometimes needed for long term construction projects
or detour routes These regulatory black and white
signs are used when a reduced speed is needed for
driver safety valid 24 hours a day 7 days a week
these must be authorized by the commissioner of
transportation for any roadway
See the website www dot state mn us speed
for more information o Work Zone Speed Guidelines
Questions Answers
Will lowering the speed limit reduce speeds
NO Studies show that there is little change in the speed pattem
after the posting of a speed limit The driver is much more
influenced by the roadway conditions
Will lowering the speed limit reduce crash frequency
NO Although lowering the speed limit is often seen as a
cure all in preventing crashes this is not the case Crashes are
most often the result of driver inattention and driver error
However if a posted speed limit is unrealistically low it creates a
greater speed variance i e some drivers follow the speed limit
while most drive the reasonable speed This speed variance can
contribute to crashes
Why do we even have speed limits
A uniform speed of vehicles in a traffic flow results in the
safest operation The posted speed limits can keep the traffic
flowing smoothly provided the majority of drivers find the
speed limits reasonable To best do this the limits must be
consistent throughout the state The speed limits also give the
motorist an idea of a reasonable speed to drive in an unfamiliar
location The speed limits are used by police officials to
identify excessive speeds and curb unreasonable behavior
Who Do 1 Contact
If you believe that there is a safety concern or an inappropriate
speed limit posted the person to contact depends on the type of
road
TRUNK HIGHWAYS
For regulatory and advisory speed limits on the trunk highway
system you may contact the district traffic engineer at your
Mn DOT district office
The trunk highway system includes
CJ Interstate Highways
o U S Highways and
Ll Minnesota State Highways
LOCAL STREETS AND HIGHWAYS
For these roadways you may contact your local road authority
county city or township For advisory speed limits The
local road authority can determine these advisory speeds and
post the plates without authorization from the commissioner of
transportation For regulatory speed limits The local road
authority can pass a resolution requesting an investigation by
Mn DOT Based upon the results Mn DOT may then
authorize the local road authority to post new speed limits
The phone numbers to call for state or local assistance can be
found in the phone book under government listings If you are
unable to find the proper phone number you may call the
Mn DOT Information Center at the following numbers
1 800 657 3774 Greater Minnesota or
651 296 3000 Twin Cities Metro Area
J DOUBLE FINES will be imposed for violating any regulatory speed limits in work zones or
in school zones Fines are also double for failing to reduce speed when passing by a stopped
emergency vehicle with its lights flashing
J When an EMERGENCY VEHICLE is approaching you move to the closest shoulder
without crossing the path of the approaching emergency vehicle You may proceed when the
emergency vehicle passes you If you are approaching a stopped emergency vehicle with its lights flashing immediately reduce
speed and if it s safe to do so move over in your lane away from the stopped emergency vehicle Drivers should actually change
lanes if there are two or more lanes in the same direction and there are no vehicles in their path
Safety
Notes
201
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES MINNESOTA
DATE February 8 2010 RESOLUTION NO 2010
MOTION BY SECONDED BY
A RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZING
PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
AUDUBON ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT NO 10 02
WHEREAS on January 25 2010 the City Council received the feasibility report for the
Audubon Road Reconstruction Project and called for a public hearing to be held on February 8
2010 for the Audubon Road Reconstruction Project and
AND WHEREAS ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the hearing
was given and the hearing was held thereon on the 8th day of February 2010 which all persons
desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Chanhassen City Council
1 Such improvement is necessary cost effective and feasible as detailed in the feasibility
report
2 Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the Council resolution adopted
February 8 2010
3 Approves the feasibility study and authorizes City staff to prepare plans and specifications
for the Audubon Road Reconstruction Project No 10 02
Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 8th day of February 2010
ATTEST
Todd Gerhardt City Manager Thomas A Furlong Mayor
YES NO ABSENT
202
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ss
COUNTY OF CARVER
I Karen J Engelhardt being first duly sworn on oath deposes that she is and was on
January 27 2010 the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City ofChanhassen
Minnesota that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public
Hearing for the Audubon Road Reconstruction Project 10 02 to the persons named on
attached Exhibit A by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner
and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage
fully prepaid thereon that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such
by the records of the County Treasurer Carver County Minnesota and by other appropriate
records
2010 JEAN M STECKl NG I Notary PUbliC Minnesota My CommIssion Expires Jan 31 2014
203
January 27 2010 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
Re Notice of Public Hearing for Aududon Road Reconstruction
Project No 10 02
Dear Property Owner
A Public Hearine has been scheduled for 7 00 pm or as soon thereafter as possible on
Mondav February 8 2010 in the City Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall
during a regularly scheduled council meeting The hearing is your opportunity to voice your
opinion directly to the City Council before they make their decision whether or not to
authorize the preparation of plans and specifications The assessment methodology or
amounts are not determined at this City Council meeting these issues will be addressed at the
assessment hearing which is tentatively scheduled for April 2010
If you wish to submit written comments for the public hearing please submit them to me by
e mail afauske@ci chanhassen mn us or send them to my attention at City Hall Please
submit comments by 3 30 p m on Thursday February 4 2010 to allow time for the
Councilmembers to receive and read your comments prior to the hearing NOTE Please be
advised that any comments received via email will become public record and included in the
staff report for this item
The feasibility study proposes improvements to Audubon Road from Lake Drive West to
Lyman Boulevard In general the proposed improvements include reconstruction of public
streets installation of curb and gutter turn lanes storm sewer trail improvements and minor
watermain work
The estimated cost of the improvements within your area is 2 800 000
Consistent with the City s practice the feasibility study proposes to assess properties that
have driveway access to this segment of Audubon Road The unit assessment was calculated
assuming 90 foot wide single family lots existing on each side of this section of Audubon
Road and is based on 40 of the estimated cost of a residential road The preliminary
assessment for your property is currently estimated to be 6 295 00 If the project moves
forward and construction bids are received the actual construction cost will be used to
calculate the assessments
If you are unable to attend the public hearing please feel free to contact me with any
questions or comments at 952 227 1164 or afauske@ci chanhassen mn us Additional
information is available on the City s website at www ci chanhassen mn us serv cipIlO
02 html
Sincerely
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
A e
Assistant City Engineer
g eng public 2010 projects IO 02 audubon road imp ph notice doc
204
January 27 2010 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
Re Notice of Public Hearing for Aududon Road Reconstruction
Project No 1 0 02
Dear Property Owner
A Public Hearine has been scheduled for 7 00 pm or as soon thereafter as possible on
Mondav February 8 2010 in the City Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall
during a regularly scheduled council meeting The hearing is your opportunity to voice your
opinion directly to the City Council before they make their decision whether or not to
authorize the preparation of plans and specifications The assessment methodology or
amounts are not determined at this City Council meeting these issues will be addressed at the
assessment hearing which is tentatively scheduled for April 2010
If you wish to submit written comments for the public hearing please submit them to me by
e mail afauske@cLchanhassen mn us or send them to my attention at City Hall Please
submit comments by 3 30 p m on Thursday February 4 2010 to allow time for the
Councilmembers to receive and read your comments prior to the hearing NOTE Please be
advised that any comments received via email will become public record and included in the
staff report for this item
The feasibility study proposes improvements to Audubon Road from Lake Drive West to
Lyman Boulevard In general the proposed improvements include reconstruction of public
streets installation of curb and gutter turn lanes storm sewer trail improvements and minor
watermain work
The estimated cost of the improvements within your area is 2 800 000
Consistent with the City s practice the feasibility study proposes to assess properties that
have driveway access to this segment of Audubon Road The unit assessment was calculated
assuming 90 foot wide single family lots existing on each side of this section of Audubon
Road and is based on 40 of the estimated cost of a residential road The preliminary
assessment for your property is currently estimated to be 6 295 00 If you wish to have
water service stubbed to your property an additional fee of 1 175 00 will be assessed for a
total assessment of 7 470 00 If the project moves forward and construction bids are
received the actual construction cost will be used to calculate the assessments
If you are unable to attend the public hearing please feel free to contact me with any
questions or comments at 952 227 1164 or afauske@ci chanhassen mn us Additional
information is available on the City s website at www cLchanhassen mn us serv cipIlO
02 html
Sincerely
CIl1U C I
Alyson Fauske P E
Assistant City Engineer
g eng public 2010 projects IO 02 audubon road imp ph notice water option doc
205
PATRICK WALSH
8731 AUDUBON RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8411
CYNTHIA F BONGARD TRUSTEE
8831 AUDUBON RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 9407
RONALD W CAROL M ENTINGER
8851 AUDUBON RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 9407
TIMOTHY C BOYCE
8941 AUDUBON RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8412
BARRY L SUZANNE L L1BENGOOD
8950 AUDUBON RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8412
DENNIS CHADDERDON
8900 AUDUBON RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8412
STEPJEN J MARY P MONSON
8850 AUDUBON RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 9407
ANTHONY 0 PAMELA R STRAND
8640 AUDUBON RD
CHANHASSEN MN55317 9401
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
Correspondence Packet
Information from Flying Cloud Airport Joint Airport Zoning Board Meeting on January 28 2010
Letter from Thomas K Scallen Chanhassen Dinner Theatres dated January 26 2010
Memo from Greg Sticha re Review of Claims Paid dated February 1 2010
230
Flying Cloud Airport
Joint Airport Zoning Board
Meeting Agenda
Thursday January 28 2010
4 00 P M
Eden Prairie City Center Heritage Rooms 1 2
8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie
Aeenda Items
1 Chair Remarks
2 Approval of Meeting Agenda
3 Approval of November 19 2009 FCM JAZB Meeting Minutes
4 Public Comments
5 Review of City of Eden Prairie Economic Analysis
6 Review of Additional Safety Analysis in the Context of Existing and
Future Possible Land Uses in the State Safety Zones
7 Next Meeting Date
231
FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT
JOINT AIRPORT ZONING BOARD
Thursday November 19 2009
Eden Prairie City Center Heritage Rooms 3 4
8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie MN
MINUTES
Rick King Chair called the Flying Cloud Airport Joint Airport Zoning Board meeting to
order at 3 05 p m The following were attendance
Members Rick King Chair
Glen Markegard City of Bloomington
Kate Aanenson City of Chanhassen
Brad Aho City of Eden Prairie
Jon Duckstad City of Eden Prairie
Joseph Helkamp City of Shakopee
Julie Klima City of Shakopee
Molly Sigel Metropolitan Airports Commission
Sherry Stenerson Metropolitan Airports Commission
Others Scott Neal Scott Kipp City of Eden Prairie Audrey Wald Larry Dallam
HNTB Deb Sorenson Mn DOT Glen Orcutt Federal Aviation
Administration Chauncey Case Metropolitan Council Tom Anderson
Cameron Boyd Jenn Felger Roy Fuhrmann Eric Johnson Chad Leqve
Dennis Probst Bridget Rief MAC Staff
1 APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA
IT WAS MOVED BY HELKAMP SECONDED BY DUCKSTAD TO APPROVE
THE AGENDA AS PRESENTED THE MOTION CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE
2 APPROVAL OF AUGUST 13 2009 FCMJAZB MEETING MINUTES
IT WAS MOVED BY DUCKSTAD SECONDED BYHELKAMP TO APPROVE
THE MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 13 2009 FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT JOINT
AIRPORT ZONING BOARD MEETING AS PRESENTED THE MOTION
CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
3 REVIEW OF SAFETY STUDY FOR FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT
Larry Dallam HNTB gave a presentation on the Safety Study that was prepared
for the Flying Cloud Airport as directed by the Board Mr Dallam reviewed the
methodology used to calculate the accident probabilities and the results of the
analysis
232
Flying Cloud Airport Joint Airport Zoning Board
November 19 2009
Page 2
Based on the analysis Mr Oallam presented the following findings
FCM s Ic cation and the terrain around the airport do not pose safety risks
Probability of Accident in Safety Zone A Outside RPZ The average
number of years between an accident at the runway ends varies from 26
years for Runway 28L end to 521 years for the Runway 10R end
assuming the 2025 forecast operations at the runway ends remain
constant
Assuming an above ground object equal to the total size of Zone A
outside the RPZ the probability of an accident at the Runway 10R end in
2025 is less than the FAA Collision Standard of 1 0 accidents per 10 000 000 operations and greater than the Standard at the Runway 18
36 10l 28R and 28l ends
There is a higher probability of an aircraft accident crash in the Off Airport
area than in Safety ZoneA outside the RPZ at each runway end
Probability of Accident in Safety Zone B The average number of years
between an accident at the runway ends varies from 174 years for the
Runway 10l end to 511 years for the Runway 36 end assuming the 2025
forecast operations at the runway ends remain constant
Assuming an above ground object equal to the total size of Zone B the
probability of an aircraft accident at the Runway 28R end in 2025 is less
than the FAA Collision Standard of and greater than the Standard at the
Runway 18 36 10l 10R and 28l ends
There is a higher probability of an aircraft accident crash in the Off Airport
area than in Safety Zone B at each runway end
Probability of Accident in Occupant Areas in State Safety Zones The
probabilities of an aircraft accident in the areas where people could
use occupy the land based on the Eden Prairie Comprehensive Plan are
as follows
o 0 253 per 10 000 000 operations in Runway 10R Safety Zone B
o 0 169 per 10 000 000 operations in Runway 28l Safety Zone A
o 0 563 per 10 000 000 operations in Runway 28l Safety Zone B
o 0 126 per 10 000 000 operations in Runway 10l Safety Zone B
o 0 170 per 10 000 000 operations in Runway 28R Safety Zone B
These probabilities are well below the FAA Collision Standard of 1 0
accidents per 10 000 000 operations
The lowest accident occurrence in an occupant area in a State Safety Zone is 388years which is 0 26 occurrences every 100 years
The likelihood of a fatality from an accident in the occupant areas in the
Safety Zones is extremely remote based on FAA Risk Criteria since the
probability of each accident is less than 1 0 per 10 000 000 operations and extremely improbable since it would occur less than once every 100
years
Accident Severity and Pilot Control Potential severity of off airfield
accident highly dependent upon nature of land use at accident site
233
Flying Cloud Airport Joint Airport Zoning Board
November 19 2009
Page 3
Mr Dallam conCluded his presentation by stating that the findings of the study
suggest that strict application of the MnlDOT Model Zoning Ordinance is not
required to provide a reasonable standard of safety around FCM however it is
suggested that consideration be given to land use controls beyond what might
otherwise be adopted when the accident probability is less than 1 in 10 million
operations
During the presentation Board members asked questions regarding the data
used in the Berkeley study the number of operations for FCM from 1989 to 2008
3 711 200 and whether the Board will consider areas in the vicinity of the
airport or inhey are limited to the safety zones at the ends oUhe runway Chair
King clarified that the Board s scope is Safety Zones A and B and that the Board
has no jurisdiction in the other areas surrounding the airport
Discussion also occurred regarding the potential for a reduced accident rate in
the future due to airport improvements and aircraft technology and whether there
is any correlation in the Berkeley Study with those pilots maintaining control and
the location of impact
Chair King clarified that HNTB s recommendation is that there seems to be some
flexibility around the standard Mn DOT model for zoning and that land use
controls in those areas be considered by the Board
4 REVIEW OF POTENTIAL MAC PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT
Eric Johnson MAC staff reviewed the available land around the airport that is
MAC owned and development opportunities associated with those properties
He noted that the potential options do not take into account all of the safety zone
issues but rather looks at the best potential development opportunities around
the airport without consideration of airport zoning issues
Mr Johnson reviewed the various areas for potential development and
responded to questions from the Board It was noted that some of the properties
are not located in the safety zones He stated that there are ongoing discussions
with the City regarding the ballfields Staff will be meeting with the FAA for their
feedback since based on the appraisals some of the proposed land rents are
significantly higher than what the City is currently paying Staff would like to talk
to the FAA regarding their views as to the value of good will of the City keeping
the use of the ballfields and if the potential for commercial development to incur
more sizeable land rent could offset the City rent costs
Scott Kipp City of Eden Prairie staff distributed a memo to the Board regarding
the development options outlining the City s concerns and requirements He
noted that the memo was based on an earlier version of the development
options
234
Flying Cloud Airport Joint Airport Zoning Board
November 19 2009
Page 4
Chair King stated that further work between the City and MAC is required He
requested that the two groups get together before the next meeting to discuss
the issues taking into account the 2002 agreement between the City and the
MAC The Board agreed
5 Mn DOT REPORT
Deb Sorenson MnIDOT presented information regarding the technical data
behind the Model Ordinance Safety Zone dimensions and development
restrictions She stated that the safety zones were based not on the probability
of an accident happening but rather on having space available when an accident
did happen The intent of the legislation is to encourage compatible land uses
Ms Sorenson provided background information on how the lengths of the zones
in the model ordinance were determined
Ms Sorenson also reported on the State Zoning Ordihances that deviate from
the State Airport Zoning Standards She noted that out of 136 publicly owned
airports MAC airports excluded approximately 13 of the ordinances deviate
from the strict standards of the Model Ordinance 14 6 deviate from practice or
policy 3 deviate from procedure and 10 8 exceed the standards It was
noted that MSP and Crystal airports deviate from the standards Dennis Probst
MAC staff reported that zoning is in place at 3 of the MAC owned airports MSP
Crystal and Lake Elmo The St Paul Downtown Airport zoning process is
currently underway and MAC intends to update the Crystal and Lake Elmo
ordinances as well as develop ordinances for Anoka County Blaine and Airlake
airports
6 NEXT MEETING
Chair King discussed the accident probability ratios at FCM which differ from
STP and MSP Mr Leqve discusseq the reasonableness outlined in State
Statutes and stated that work needs to be done to determine the social and
economic impacts by any ordinance that is implemented He indicated additional
land use work needs to be done to get a better picture of potential developments
that could go forward without any zoning impacts and then determine what
zoning is r quired to strike a reasonable balance to maintain the economic
viability while maintaining a reasonable standard of safety He stated the
information that was providedin the safety study is very helpful in framing various
options for the Board s consideration Mr Aho stated that the previous
agreement between the MAC and the City must also be taken into consideratio n
Mr Kipp clarified that the Board s focus will be on the safety zones and some of
the land uses that have been defined as potential development sites are issues
between the City and the MAC and should not be part of the Board s
considerations Ms Sigel stated that the Board s role is very specific and that if
staff provides additional information regarding proposed land use it should be
explained as to what the Board is to do with that information where the Board
has a role in decision making and how the decisions will actually impact the land
that might be used She also asked about the land the City owns and how it is
235
Flying Cloud Airport Joint Airport Zoni ng Board
November 19 2009
Page 5
being used because some of the property under discussion is directly adjacent to
it
Mr Leqve stated that the role of this Board is not to get into a detailed
development discussion or to determine what fits the City in terms of use of
available property The Board will need to make some assumptions as to what
might happen in those areas in order to get a financial picture of the impacts in
order to answer the reasonableness question Mr Johnson responded to a
question regarding the timeline for future developments noting that it wiU require
coordination between the City and MAC to determine what makes the most
sense Mr Probst noted that the difference at FCM compared to other airports is
that there is no underlying City zoning on the property that has the potential for
development partly because it is MAC owned Therefore there is an extra step
to understand what is acceptable and desirable by the City as the Board
determines whether to modify the model zones Ms Stenerson stated that it
would be helpful to get a better understanding of the properties surrounding the
MAC owned properties
Chair King stated that once the Board has a better understanding of the land use
around the airport it should be able to discuss the impacted zones He also
asked whether additional time is needed before the next scheduled meeting to
pull that information together
Mr Leqve noted that the intent is to try to provide further definition on what the
economic impacts are based on mutually agreeable development options
between MAC and the City with the model ordinance applied to those areas
This would be followed by development of options that attempt to strike the
balance between the safety needs and the economic impacts for the Board s
consideration
The Board agreed to cancel the December meeting in order to allow additional
time to gather the best possible information The next meeting of the Board was
scheduled for January 21st this meeting was subsequently changed to January
28 2010
Chair King also asked the Board to consider changing the start time of the
meetings to 4 00 p m The Board agreed
IT WAS MOVED BY HELKAMP SECONDED BY DUCKSTAD TO ADJOURN THE
MOTION CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
The meeting was adjourned at 4 50 p m
236
Date January 28 2010
Memo
To Scott H Neal City Manager
From Michael D Franzen City Planner
Scott A Kipp Senior Planner
Subject Development of Land within Safety Zones
Background
The City Staff was asked to evaluate the development potential of land within safety zones in
the following categories
Land and building value
Employment
City tax
Development Alternatives
Staff looked at four development alternatives
1 Development according to the City s 2008 adopted Guide Plan
2 State Model Ordinance
3 Development on MAC property
4 Maximum development
Alternative 1 Development according to the City s 2008 adopted Guide Plan
Land and building value 11 700 000
Employment 0
City Tax 33 930
All MAC property is currently gUided Airport The definition of airport according to the 2008
adopted guide plan is
A 1 which is devoted primarily to aircraft takeoff landing and taxing operations and
hangars
A 2 which is devoted to airport safety park open space agriculture and aircraft
navigation structures
237
The guide plan shows no development at the airport
Private residential developable land in the B zone west of Eden Prairie Road is 11 86
and 11 units are possible
Private residential developable land in the B zone east of Highway 212 and south of
Pioneer Trail is 5 acres and 10 units are possible
MAC shows 102 80 acres of land proposed for other than airport use Approximately
21 22 acres is in area A l Approximately 81 58 acres of this total is in area A 2
Alternative 2 State Model Ordinance
Office land and building value 39 204 000
Employment 1 633
City Tax 137 214
Total acres 67
42 acres is future park as identified in the Final Agreement
25 net acres at a 30 floor area ratio is 326 700 square feet
Development is assumed as one story office
Building and land value 120 00 square foot
Employment ratio 4 employees for every 1 000 square feet of building
Alternative 3 Development on MAC property
Office land and building value 160 870 520
Employment 5 373
City Tax 563 846
Total acres 102 80
102 80 net acres at a 30 floor area ratio is 1 343 390 square feet of building
Development is assumed as one story office
Building and land value 120 00 square foot
Employment ratio 4 employees for every 1 000 square feet of building
238
Alternative 4 Maximum development Alternative 1 Alternative 3
Residential land and building value 11 700 000
Employment 0
City Tax 33 930
Office land and building value 160 870 520
Employment 5 373
City Tax 563 846
Residential
Private residential developable land in the B zone west of Eden Prairie Road is 11 86
and 11 units are possible
Private residential developable land in the B zone east of Highway 212 and south of
Pioneer Trail is 5 acres and 10 units are possible
Office
173 46 total acres
42 00 acres is future park as identified in the Final Agreement
28 66 acres is VOR
102 80 net acres
102 80 acres at a 30 floor area ratio is 1 343 390 square feet of building
Employment ratio 4 employees for every 1 000 square feet of building
Development is assumed as one story office
Building and land value 120 00jsquare foot
Value Employment City tax
Alternative 1 11 700 000 0 33 390
Alternative 2 29 204 000 1 633 137 214
Alternative 3 160 870 520 5 373 563 846
Alternative 4 172 570 520 5 373 597 236
239
Source Cit of Eden Prairie Metro olitan Council
o Rural Residential 10 Units Acre Industrial 0 Public Quasi Public Airport Property
D Low Density Residential 1 2 5 Units Acre 0 Neighborhood Commercial 0 Golf Course MUSA line
o Medium Density residential 2 5 10 Units Acre D Community Commercial Church Cemetery Creeks
H h D ty R d t 11040 U t A r o Principal Arterial Ig ensl eSI en la nI S cre Regional Commercial Open Water
A Minor Arterial Office PII J Town Center 0 Right Of Way
o Airport Park Open Space
B Minor Arterial
6
N
0 0 5 1
I I I Miles Major Collector
Minor Collector
LAND USE GUIDE PLAN MAP 2030
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE 2008
October 20 2009
Figure 3 2
Development according to the 2008 adopted Guide Plan Alternative 1 240
1
i t
CJ
Ll
J ri t li L
tV L
v
l l
i
rr
0
ji
Ii
1 Ii
1
il
i
h i
t i
i
j
J
H
i
ii
j
r
1 I
i
I I I i1t
I J
ittJe RiC L ke
Grass Lake
u
i STATE MODEL ORDINANCE
January 28 2010
tli
rrf lJ i ih
1 i J
1 l T J
i Ie 1 I t I r r I i k
f f ll
I
H
8 VOR
CJ VOR Buffer
D Safety Zone A
C J Safety Zone B
o Airport Boundary
CJ MAC Developable Acres
rz a Future Park
D
N
ANALYSIS
ALTERNATIVE 2
241
L F r r oi I L 1 @ r j I f 3 J DNl TMOUTH I l l 6 1 r D 9 4 I f j q t i I f J TH G J SS3 l1 l301iM I rjJ b l uss c t l l r I o prl z tl C l f 9 1 0i J I I J L s S 5 i l t lH B L r 1 Cl 1 I J i i I J 3 lltN7 S 2 J l l 1lCNil 310 14 I I jl
r
I
i
i
I
I
I
1 17 0
IIlQt II
r
V s
0
o if lj J
tt
LJ
q
t
I
s 0H 3I lWd
v hi J J
I
ON 1 J S
D s
i b 7 G
m w j
t
ex ci i
ci
f Ii
I jUt
I i r o o I
o J I n
C J J I f
I I 1 r 0 0 i
J 1 L 1 1 1 J II II l I J
1 nrf l Jr I
t 11 7r 1 if 0 J
I I 1r
t
iI lt J
i I II i R i I
O I II if I
1 I 1
fl II 1 7 1
ji r 1 fl 1
n
1 J I I II
t r f F l i
2 II II I I f l I I Ir
p r 1 I 0 j
g l 1 I il 11 J r I f II I liL I I I 1 l 1 1r h fi d L 1 I 1 t I fL I
I I
I r I I I
1 1 ft l J
1 1 7
0 1 I r
g 1 t
f t 4b t j
e v
J J1 t 1
TH M 1 C 1
t J v
13 JI
1
I 0
I I 1
i 7
c
V
io J 3 4 lQ
c
o
N
lD
c
0
E c c 15 0
ro
c38
J e L1 CDeco cr g oo g ooE OOD J f D
J
1
69
AO S
j 1
0 I f
J
1
I
Development on MAC Property Alternative 3 242
I l u J r c v I 71 Y lJiJ Q T rrr f 1I j r J r l r n iIL lJtrj j i I l li i V V y
en Lak I12 Iti f T J
f l Red Rock Lak
j n t t McCJYt A 1 ff t jLLl I tl j l fE2i d l fDI lITmV t l 1 1 L I Lt t lr i l LJ i7i r H 1 C f jrl 1 1 c ill h l r C f LL i j r 0 Y7J i I r r Jr t r 1 r 8 ii S Tl t ff fl 5 02 LI it g q 3 n 1 t ts l
l t 1 r l
i t J 1 1 1 I l G I I ltrn j 1 I
I
I t f I3 F l A il ii i i r J I t g lj 7 J lt J A s i f I S Ill l J J7 If tt 0 Y I f H1t trl Qt l i c 1 I l 1L n JI
1 1 I I f S ii I j ill ri r f 1 1 1 J r i lIr r 1 i r Ir I I I 1iTtrtf r t q t t J I F A l I tJi i i r JlfT 111 j rr I J l L LT r l f Ill Y l 7 I V
f f J L J t Lt l rnTn ffij m i mJT l uff rr r F J t 1 J L I 3 2 c I 1 W I 81 1 1 1 l l t t i TJ CF I J 1 L C Hl I h r r J Lf I E lli H i J f Y C 1 1 1 F t J 5 P J rr L J0 i l t 10 1 T 1 1 1 Y J c r r l j rr u o J r l r t II 1 1 sr lt 1 jl HI TlIlJCr W J r l r Ftc f j l I t 1 r tIiU t f n jl J 7 Df ir t C TIII Jr I lill r l 1 1 Ftc Slar ngLake n Ir r J 1 yll H l LI Il I i J l1 V f tL t J L J U j 1 l J rJr r J J ii 1 L1J L 1 j 1 rj L J r r y fl 1 2 J d cF q rrn l I 1J z F j I i L rIH i Dt Vl 1 9bt I L liJ U 1 I 71 j71 i i r I II 2h 8 1 t lhtjE cJ t 5t tl li ITIllij Frr I z j I L 0P T illjb f rn1 r i f I au LLwl Jz l I c il f J iT l l j l t i rn I tt ll J i L t t I I r 17 0 i lT C I
1 l j g i
j t Cn 1 oj f 1J l I L i 2 f 0 q 1 I
L J 7 rI 61 I z t j EiJEcI CL j
krrt1 1jFI Jq V
j ClfJjld riAt l 1 1 lcf IFj cll P lLLJ 1 t j ifT 5 llTIl J 1
i r1 1 n u
s T Jii J E p E i J l 1 It Jrrl t 11 J L l llr qll sI
I
V I 1
jti f 1r
I Y OS r
l
j lr 1 8F
i t F 8 TjE I UJJ J t
1 c1 11 T ii1 r mY4 1 r J J f t c T d DJ i
1 C u r 1mI l t l I J llt r d7 h t f I1d r T ul zv T1l e I c I Ii if t J ljT LJ II f ff i 2 J L1 1 1 L1 1 1 i iJ U LlfjP r I o
L IQ
I l 1lJ Jffi
r f J l
lJ 2
i
1
i
1
t I I
Grass Lake
I
j t
r
l
li 1
I
1
I I
I I I i
I I
J
i
I i
1
DRPZ
D Safety Zone A
1 Safety Zone B
Q VOR
D VOR Buffer
CJ MAC Developable Acres
CJ MAC Property Boundary
Privale Property Developable Acres
Future Park
L
D
N
i MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT
January 28 2010
ANALYSIS
ALTERNATIVE 4
243
I I
II N v
1
A
n
q m
17 IIJ llU
U J
j
I
UA 1
CJA 2
Airport Boundary
N
o 750 1 500 3 000
Feet
Jfr t AIRPORT
I COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE 2007 Figure 3 4
It i
July 28 2009
244
MEMORANDUM
TO FCM Joint Airport Zoning Board JAZB
FROM
SUBJECT
Chad E leqve Manager Aviation Noise and Satellite Programs
FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT ZONING BACKGROUND SAFETY
STUDY SUMMARY AND EXISTING AND FUTURE LAND USE
CONSIDERATIONS IN RUNWAY SAFETY ZONES
DATE January 21 2010
At the August 13 2009 Flying Cloud Airport FCM Joint Airport Zoning Board JAZB meeting staff briefed the Board on the background of federal and state zoning criteria Based on
statutory guidance and past practices at other MAC airports the Board directed staff to conduct
an FCM safety study to determine the existing safety characteristics of the airport In addition
the Board directed City of Eden Prairie staff to conduct an economic analysis of the prospective development opportunities in the areas affected by the state model zones including
coordination with MAC staff on the possible non aeronautical development of MAC properties
located in the zones At the November 19 2009JAZB meeting representatives from HNTB
presented the FCMSafety Study findings MAC staff presented MAC properties aroUnd the
airport being considered for development and City staff presented a preliminary study of the
MAC property development feasibility
As part of the Board discussion on Nove mber 19th MAC and Eden Prairie staff were directed to
meet again to discuss the property development opportunities in the respective safety zones
and prepare an economic study detailing the economic impacts of the application of the State
Model Zones on the prospective MAC owned non aeronautical development areas as well as
other prospective development areas in the zones Additionally the Board directed MAC staff to
prepare additional information in consideration of the safety study findings that could aid in the
Board s evaluation of zoning options that might be available aside from the adoption of the
State Model Ordinance that would meet the reasonableness standard as spelled out in the
statutory requirement under Minn Stat 9360 066 subd 1
At the January 28 2010 FCM JAZB meeting Eden Prairie City staff will provide a presentation
on the findings of their economic analysis of properties located within the State Model Safety
Zones Additionally MAC staff will provide a review of airport zoning background from the
federal and state perspectives a review of zoning board actions at other MAC airports
Minneapolis St Paul International Airport and St Paul Downtown Airport based on safety and
economic study findings a summary of the FCM Safety Study results additional relevant
accident data information and analysis of the disposition of existing and possible future land
uses in the context of safety zones around FCM
This information is being provided for the Board s consideration in formalizing direction to MAC
staff on the development of a Draft FCM Zoning Ordinance Document at the January 28 2010
Board meeting
245
1 AIRPORT ZONING BACKGROUND
1 1 Federal Zon ina Reau irements
At the Federal level the Federal Aviation Administration FAA is the agency primarily
responsible for land use compatibility around airports Although the FAA does not playa direct
role in the zoning and land use planning practices around United States airports it provides
critical land use planning guidance technical assistance and funding to airports In this capacity
the FAA issues a variety of regulations and gUidance documents under federal law that affects
land use planning around airports
FAA land use guidance focuses on two areas 1 runway protection zones and 2 airspace
protection
1 1 1 Federal Runwav Protection Zones
Runway Protection Zones RPZs are defined in FAA Advisory Circular 150 5300 13 Airport Design The intent of RPZs is to provide safety for people and property on the ground in the
vicinity of runway ends at airports The FAA accomplishes this goal through land use controls in
RPZs designed to maintain areas near the ends of airport runways that are free of incompatible
objects and activities RPZs are trapezoid shapes centered on the approximate extended
runway centerline radiating from the end of a runway The dimensions of the RPZ are a function
of the type of aircraft using the runway and approach visibility minima associated with the
runway end
1 1 2 Federal Airspace Protection
Federal Aviation Regulation Part 77 Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace establishes
standards for determining obstructions to navigable airspace and the effects of such
obstructions on the safe and efficient use of that airspace
The height limitations associated with Part 77 are defined in terms of imaginary surfaces in the
airspace surrounding an airport These surfaces extend from about 2 t03 miles from the airport
except for runways with precision instrument approaches in which case the surfaces extend
approximately 9 5 miles from the runway end The various imaginary surfaces include the
primary surface transitional surface horizontal surface conical surface and the approach
surface
Under Part 77 the FAA has established a process for reviewing and evaluating proposed
structures in the vicinity of airports FAA Advisory Circular AC 7460 establishes an airspace
review process and provides information to individuals wishing to erect or alter structures that
may affect navigable airspace around an airport In administering 14 CFR Part 77 the FAA s
main objective is to ensure the safe and efficient use of naviga ble airspace around airports
TheFAA has established five differentthresholds for evaluating whether a structure may affect
navigable airspace around an airport If anyone of these thresholds is reached the FAA
requests that an individual wishing to erect or alter a structure seek the FAA s approval before
commencing construction One of the FAA thresholds applies if a structure is within 20 000
feet of an airport or seaplane base with at least one runway more than 3 200 feet in length and
the object would exceed a slope of 100 1 horizontally 100 feet horizontally for each 1 foot
vertically from the nearest point of the nearest runway 1
1 Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular 7017460 2k pg 2
2
246
After receiving a request for approval the FAA will typically issue one of the following three
determ inations
Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation The subject construction
does not exceed obstruction standards and markingllighting is not required
Conditional Determination The proposed construction alteration would
be acceptable contingent upon implementing mitigating measures marking
and lighting etc
Objectionable The proposed construction alteration is determined to bea
hazard and is thus objectionable The reasons for this determination are
outlined to the proponent
By establishing threshold criteria and then requiring a detailed airspace hazard analysis the
FAA process provides a safety buffer In certain circumstances the FAA s detailed airspace
hazard analysis results in FAA approval for developments near airports that may be in excess of
the general height limitations set forth in 14 CFR Part 77
2 State of Minnesota Runwav Safety Areas and Airspace Protection
On January 1 1946 the State of Minnesota enacted its first model airport zoning ordinance By
1958 the State designated Safety Zones A Band C as part of the model airport zoning
standard In 1973 local protective airport zoning was made a condition for receiving federal and
state funds Minnesota is one of the few states that have land use safety controls for airports
that go beyond the requirements of FAA regulations
2 1 1 State Model Zonina Ordinance Runwav Safety Zones
State Safety Zone A is a trapezoidal shape at the end of a runway beginning at the edge of the
primary surface and flaring outward to a distance of approximately 2 3 of the runway length
State Safety Zone B is a trapezoidal shape with the same flare as Zone A extending outward
from the end of Zone A to a distance of approximately 1 3 of the runway length The extent of
State Safety Zone C is coincidental with the extent of the horizontal airspace surface
Under Minnesota law Zone A must not contain buildings temporary structures exposed
transmission lines or other similar above ground land use structural hazards Land uses in
Zone A are restricted to those uses that will not create attract or bring together an assembly of
persons Permitted uses in Zone A include but are not limited to agriculture seasonal crops
horticulture animal husbandry raising of livestock wildlife habitat light outdoor recreation non
spectator cemeteries and automobile parking
Zone B uses are restricted as fallows
Each use must be on a site whose area is not less than 3 acres
Each use must not create attract or bring together a site population that
would exceed 15 times that of the site acreage
Each site must have no more than one building plot upon which any number
of structures may be erected
3
247
A building plot must be a single uniform and non contrived area whose
shape is uncomplicated and whose area must not exceed minimum ratios
with respect to the total site area
The following uses are specifically prohibited in Zone B
Churches hospitals schools theaters stadiums hotels motels trailer
courts campgrounds and other places of frequent public or semi public
assembly
In Zone C no use may be made of any land that creates or caiJses interference with the
operations of radio or electronic facilities on the airport or with radio or electronic
communications between the airport and aircraft In addition Zone C prohibits land uses that
make it difficult for pilots to distinguish between airport lights and other lights result in glare in
the eyes of pilots using the airport impair visibility in the vicinity of the airport or otherwise
endanger the landing taking off or maneuvering of aircraft All structure heights in Zone Care
limited to 150 feet above the primary surface at the airport
2 1 2 State Model ZoninQ Ordinance Airspace Protecti on
The State Model Zoning Ordinance height restrictions are predicated directly on the FAA s Part
77 imaginary airspace surfaces However the extent of the airspace zoning area is defined by the provisions of Minn Stat 9360 066 subd 1 b which states the following
For the purpose of promoting health safety order convenience prosperity general
welfare and for conserving property values and encouraging the most appropriate use of
land the municipality may regulate the location size and use of buildings and the
density of population in that portion of an airport hazard area under approach z ones for a
distance not to exceed two miles from the airport boundary and in other portions of an
airport hazard area may regulate by land use zoning for a distance not to exceed one
mile from the airport boundary and by height restriction zoning for a distance not to
exceed 1 1 2 miles from the airport boundary
3 REVIEW OF ZONING BOARD ACTIONS AT OTHER MAC AIRPORTS
3 1 Minneapolis St Paul International Airport ZoninQ Ordinance
Minnesota Statutes establish that airports in the state must adopt airport zoning ordinances To
do this the statutes spell out the formation of a Joint Airport Zoning Board JAZB comprised of
two members from each jurisdiction with land use control in the areas affected by airport zoning
as well as the airport proprietor
The Minneapolis St Paul International Airport MSP JAZB met to discuss and recommend a
revised MSP zoning ordinance in light of the construction of Runway 17 35 An important part 6f
this process was balancing the land use controls needed to provide safety while at the same
time considering the social and economic impacts related to prospective land use controls
Minn Stat 9360 066 subd 1 is particularly instructive when addressing the question of zoning around complex urbanized airports such as the MAC s system of airports The statute also
addresses the concept of reasonableness when balancing the variables to be considered in
the zoning process Specifically Minn Stat 9360 066 subd 1 states
Reasonab leness Standards of the commissioner defining airport hazard areas
and the categories of uses permitted and airport zoning regulations adopted under
4
248
sections 360 011 to 360 076 shall be re sonable and noneshali impose a
requirement or restriction which is not reasonably necessary to effectuate the
purposes of sections 360 011 to 360 076 In determining what minimum airport
zoning regulations may be adopted the commissioner and a local airport zoning
authority shall consider among other things the character of the flying operations
expected to be conducted at the airport the location of the airport the nature of the
terrain within the airport hazard area the existing land uses and character of the
neighborhood around the airport the uses to which the property to be zoned are
planned and adaptabl e and the social and economic costs of restricting land uses
versus the benefits derived from a strict application of the standards of the
commissioner
Consistent with the guidance provided in Minn Stat 360 066 subd 1 the MSP JAZB focused
its discussion on the land use controls that were necessary to ensure a reasonable degree of
safety around MSP Based on the substantial property development and or structural
mpdification restrictions that would be placed on the largely urbanized and developed areas
around the airport the MSP JAZB turned its focus to safety The MSP JAZB directed staff to
conduct a risk analysis to provide the Board with further clarification on the question of zoning
requirements necessary to ensure a reasonable standard of safety
In short the analysis found that within State Zones A and B but outside the federal RPZ the
accident probability at MSP was I ess than the FAA standard of one accident in 10 million
operations Additionally based on the accident rate calculations the MSP JAZB determined that
the likelihood of a fatality from an accident in State SafetY Zones A and B outside the RPZ is
extremely relllote or extremely improbable based on FAA criteria
In addition to the risk analysis the MSP JAZB focused on addressing the economic
considerations as the statute requires The Board relied on the analysis and information that
was provided by the respective cities with jurisdiction over the land uses and concluded that
there were significant financial costs associated with implementation of the State Model Zoning
Ordinance
In summary based on the findings of the Safety Study and the Economic Analysis the Board
adopted the following changes to the State Model Zoning Ordinance
Safety Zone A is co terminus with the Federal Runway Protection Zone
RPZ
Safety Zone B use restrictions do not include site acre structure limitations
andsite area to building plot area ratios and population criteria with a
maximum zone distance from the airport of 7 000 feet
Exemption for Established Residential Neighborhoods allows for the
improvement expansion and development of new residential uses in and
adjacent to Established Residenti al Neighborhoods in Safe ty Zone B
The Commissioner of Transportation approved the MSP Joint Airport Zoning Board s
recommended ordinance
5
249
3 2 St Paul Downtown Airport STP Joint Airport ZOIlinQ Board JAZB
TheSt Paul DowntownAirport STP JAZB held its first meeting on May 1 2008 and has
conducted seven meetings since culminating in the publication of a Draft STP Zoning
Ordinance on July 1 2009 for public review and comment and a public hearing on July 23
2009
The Board s fundamental goal is to develop a zoning ordinance for review and approval by the
Commissioner of Transportation and for subsequent adoption by the Board and then by local
municipalities In pursuit of this goal the Board focused its attention on the following
Mn DOT Model Ordinance
STP s unique characteristics in the context of existing and planned land uses
around the airpo rt
Maintaining a reasonable standard of safety while considering the social and
financial costs to the community
As part of the Board s discussions as was the case with the MSPJAZB it was established that
Minn Stat 360 066 subd 1 is particularly instructive when addressing the question of zoning
around complex urbanized airports such as STP and the concept of reasonableness when
balancing the statutorily recognized variables to be considered in the zoning process
As part of its deliberations the Board received a presentation from Mn DOT Aeronautics Staff
on the State Model Zoning Ordinance and related safety criteria It also received a summary of
a land use analysis that was conducted by Staff detailing the existing and planned land use
around STP that would be impacted by the application of the State Model Zoning Ordinance and
resulting airspace zones
Consistent with the guidance provided in Minn Stat 360 066 subd 1 the Board focused its
discussion on the land use analysis which detailed the existing land uses the character of the
neighborhoods around the airport and the future planned zoned uses that would be affected by
adoption of the State Model Zoning Ordinance Based on the substantial property development
andlor structural modification restrictions that would be placed on the largely urbanized and
developed areas around the airport the Board turned its focus to the safety standards that
result in the state safety zone dimensions and the related land use restrictions that are outlined
in the State Model Zoning Ordinance Based on the information provided by Mn DOTstaff at the
meeting on this issue the Board directed staff to conduct a risk analysis to provide the Board
with further clarification on the question of zoning requirements necessary to ensure a
reasonable standard of safety Specifically the study was to address the risk of accidents
occurring in the model safety zones the character of the flying operations expected to be
conducted at the airport the location of the airport and the nature of the terrain within the
airport hazard area
In short the analysis found that in all cases around STP within State Zones A and 8 outside
the federal Runway Protection Zone RPZ the accident probability was less than the Federal
Aviation Administration FAA s standard of one accident in 10 million operations Additionally based on the accident rate calculations it was determined that the likelihood of fatality from an
accident in State Safety Zones A and B outside the RPZ at each runway end is extremely
remote or extremely improbable based on FAA criteria
Following completion of the safety study the Board focused on addressing the economic
considerations Per Minn Stat 360 066 subd 1 when determining the reasonableness of a
6
250
minimum standard at an airport the economic question focuses on an analysis of the uses for
which the property to be zoned are planned and adaptable and the social and economic costs
of restricting land uses Therefore the Board relied on the analysis and information that was
provided by the respective cities that have jurisdiction over the land uses in question which in
this case is the City of St Paul
The City of Sf Paul Department of Planning and Economic Development conducted the
economic impact analysis utilizing the Fiscal Impact Model The analysis was based on the
development restrictions that are outlined in the State Model Zoning Ordinance The City s
analysis found that there are 7 333 potential lost job opportunities and a potential loss of
2 441 332 in property taxes if the provisions of the State Model Zoning Ordinance were
enacted
Based on the findings of the Safety Study and the Economic Analysis the Board recommended
the following changes to the State Model Zoning Ordinance for purposes of the first public hearing on STP
1 Safety Zone A is co terminus with the Federal Runway Protection Zone RPZ
2 Safety Zone B use restrictions do not include site acre structure limitations and site
area to building plot area ratios and population criteria
3 Exemption for Established Residential Neighborhoods a llows for the improvement
expansion and development of new residential uses in and adjacent to Established
Residential Neighborhoods in Safety Zone B
4 Airspace and Safety Zoning Limits incorporates additional zoning limit criteria based
on terrain slope characteristics
In consideration of the similarities between the findings of the safety and economic analyses
conducted at Minneapolis St Paullntemational Airport MSP andSTP as part of the respective
JAZB deliberations carried out for each airport the elements of the Draft STP Zoning Ordinance
listed in points 1 3 above are consistent with the provisions of the MSP Zoning Ordinance
Because STP is located in a valley along the Mississippi River the airport has terrain elevations
that increase rapidly to the north and southwest of the airport These terrain features were a
major consideration in determining the runway layout at the airport This is evident when looking
at the runway configurations and the manner in which the runway headings avoid the areas of
elevated terrain However because of the elevation of these areas and the horizontal airspace
surface height criteria of 150 feet above the primary surface which is the elevation of the
runway as much as 3 640 acres of existing urban development would be located in areas
where the allowable structure height above ground would be zero under the State Model Zoning Ordinance This is due to the fact that the terrain elevation in these areas is actually more than
150 feet above the primary surface at the airport Considering that these areas are not located
in proximity to the runway ends or predominant flight patterns and that the present urban
development characteristics in these areas do not impact the current safe operation of the
airport a terrain slope criterion was incorporated in the airspace and safety zoning extents in
the Draft STP Zoning Ordinance
The STP JAZB is presently in the process of evaluating options for addressing the public
comments received on the draft document Among other things one option being evaluated is
leveraging the FAA s 7460 review process to streamline the cities implementation and
administration ofthe airspace zoning requirements The first submission of the draft STP Zoning Ordinance to the Com missioner of Transportation is antici pated in mid 2010
7
251
4 SUMMARY OF FLYING CLOUD A IRPORT SAFETY STUDY RESULTS
4 1 FCM Safety Study Background
On July 16 2009 the Flying Cloud Airport FCM Joint Airport Zoning Board JAZB held its first
meeting At that meeting it was detailed that the major considerations by the Board in
determining a zoning ordinance for the airport are
MnlDOT Model Ordinance
FCM s unique characteristics in the context of existing and planned land uses
around the airpo rt
Maintaining a reasonable standard of safety while considering the social and
financial costs to the community
As part of the Board s discussions on July 16th it was explained that Minn Stat 9360 066 subd
1 is particularly instructive when addressing the question of zoning around complex urbanized
airports such as FCM and specifically the concept of reasonableness when balancing the
statutorily recognized variables to be considered in the zoning process
On August 13 2009 the FCM JAZB conducted its second meeting At this meeting the Board
received a summary of a land use analysis that was conducted by MAC staff detailing the
existing and planned land uses around FCM that would be impacted by the application of the
State Model Zoning Ordinance and the airspace zones Additionally the Board received a
presentation from Mn DOr Aeronautics staff on the Mn DOr Model Zoning Ordinance
Consistent with the guidance provided in Minn Stat 9360 066 subd 1 the Board focused its
discussion on MAC staffs land use analysis which detailed the existing land uses the character
of the neighborhoods around the airport and the future plannedlzoned uses that would be
affected by adoption of the State Model Zoning Ordinance Based on the substantial property
development andlor structural modification restrictions that would be placed on existing and
possible future development areas around the airport the Board turned its focus to the safety standards that result in the state safety zone dimensions and the related land use restrictions
that are outlined in the state model zoning ordinance As part of this discussion the Board
questioned the Mn DOT representatives on the specific safety criteria that result in the safety
zone dimensions and the related developm ent restrictions
Based on the information provided at the meeting on the issue of foundational safety criteria the
Board directed MAC staff to conduct a safety study to provide the Board with further clarification
on the question of zoning requirements necessary to ensure a reasonable standard of safety
Consistent with the Board s direction the MAC retained the HNTB Corporation to conduct the
analysis and at the November 19 2009 FCM JAZB meeting the analysis was presented to
board members by HNTB representatives 2
2 As part of the STP JAZB efforts the analytical methodology utilized was independently evaluated by Dr Manuel Ayres Jr
wfth Applied Research Associates to provide additional expertise in the area of statistical analysis risk calculation and aitique in the development of the updated analysis Dr Ayres is a member of the Transportation Research Board TRB and served
as a member of a TRB committee that studied the issue of aircrafflairport compatibilfty related to safety around airports
enhanced accident distribution methodology that more accurately reflects the methodology utilized by the Universfty of
California at Berkeley in their study of accident locations that have land use implications as induded in the California Airport
Land Use Planning Handbook published in January 2002 and the MnlOOT Airport Land Use Compatibilfty Manual published
in September 2006
8
252
4 2 FCM Safetv Studv Filldinas
The FCM Safety Study considered the character of the flying operations at the airport and the
surrounding terrain The study analyzed accident data specific to FCM as well as 2025
forecasted operations for the airport As was done in the case of MSP andSTP the probability standard used in the study was one accident per 10 million operations 3 The analysis focused
on the areas included within the State A Zone outside the RPZand the State B Zones off each
runway at FCM It is important to point out that the application of the FAA s probability standard
in this manner is extremely conservative because it assumes that the entire area within each of
the zones is covered by a structure
The study detailed that from 1989 to 2008 there were 28 aircraft accidents at FCM 4 Based on
that information the average accident rate per100 000 operations at FCM is 0 75447 Because
the historical accident numbers at FCM are so low additional data were needed to adequately establish accident location and distribution assumptions for the probability calculations As such
the accident location data that were provided in University of Berkeley Study and the January
2002Caltrans Airport Land Use Planning Handbook were used for purposes of the probability calculations in each of the safety zones
The runway length specific accident locations from the University of Berkeley Study and the
January 2002 Caltrans Airport Land Use Planning Handbook were superimposed on the
respective runways at FCM and a count of accidents within each of the safety zones and the
occupant areas within the zones was conducted The probability of an accident occurring in the
respective zones in 2025 was calculated by multiplying the accident rate of 0 75447 by the
number offorecast operations per runway in 2025 which was then multiplied by the percentage of the total accidents on a given runway that were located in the zone of interest The total
number of operations off each end of the parallel runways were combined for purposes of this
analysis
The accident probabilities were then converted to 10 000 000 operations by multiplying the
probabilities by 10 000 000 divided by the number of operations forecasted at each runway end
note that the numbers were combined on each end of the parallel runwayS Table 4 1 provides
a comparison of the accident probabilities per runway end in each of the respective Zones to
the FAA Standard of one accident per 10 million operations as well as the number of years
between accidents
3 l lhen detennining he acceptability of a prospective structure around an airpOrt the F M uses a threshold probability of 1
collision per 10 million operations Said another way jf he probability of an airaaft colliding with the structure is less then one
time in 10 million operations then ttJe structure is considered to be safe
4An accidEmt is defined as an occurrence that results in substantial aircraft damage or serious injury from collision with the
ground
9
253
Table 4 1
Comparison of Accident Probabilities for the Runway Ends in 2025 to the FAA Collision
Standard of One Accident per 10 Million Operations and Years between Accidents
Runway End
On
Airfield
RPZ
State
Safety
Zone A
outside
RPZ
0 44
521 rs
State
Safety
Zone B
Off
Airport
FAA
Collision
Standard
1 00
1 00
1 00
1 00
1 00
1 00
1 00
1 00
1 00
36 1 00
In all of the present and future planned occupant areas within the State Safety Zones outside
the RPZ and in Zone A for Runway 10L and Zone Bfor Runway 28R the accident probabilities
are below the FAA standard of one accident in 10 million operations In the remaining State A
Zones outside the RPZ and State B Zones at the airport the probability is greater than one
accident in 10 million operations Based on the findings of the accident probability analysis it is
reasonable to conclude that measures to control land use around the airport should include
controls beyond what might be considered acceptable at airports such as MSP and STP where
the accident probabilities within all of the safety zones are below the one accident in 10 million
operations threshold
5 ADDITIONAL RELEVANT ACCIDENT DATAIINFOMRATION
In addition to considering the above analysis findings it is also instructive to consider additional
aircraft accident information that can aid in the zoning analysis process for FCM Because the
10
254
findings of the safety study ihdic te that additional consideration is warranted beyond what
might be applied at facilities with lower accident probability numbers more detailed
consideration needs to be given to the specificchaiacteristics of aircraft accidents Specifically
pilot control and crash site characteristics are important variables when attempting to determine
the nature of land use that is acceptable in the areas around an airport
5 1 Pilot Control
One important question when evaluating the degree to which land use should be controlled
around FCM is the degree to which pilots can determine the exact impact location of the aircraft
The Berkeley Study found tl lat in 95 of aircraft accidents around General Aviation GA
airports the pilot had control of the aircraft prior to impact In the Airport Land Use Compatibility
Manual published by the Minnesota Department of Transportation in September 2006 the
following is stated on page 17 of Appendix 7
In many accidents the pilot has some control of the aircraft and has the ability to
avoid some obstacles If the aircraft is small enough and the population density is low
enough in m any cases the pilot can avoid structures automobiles etc
The above facts indicate that the location of distinct open spaces in the proximity of the
extended runway centerline beyond the RPZ large enough to allow a pilot to locate clearly and
contain the extent of the crash site could be beneficial from a safety perspective
5 2 Aircraft Crash Sites
The analysis of acceptable land uses in the vicinity of FCM and the topic of contiguous open
space must be evaluated in the context of the typical characteristics of aircraft crash sites As
detailed in the Airport Land Use Compatibility Manual published by the Minnesota Department
of Transportation in September 2006 on page 17 of Appendix 7
liAs part of Caltrans development of their Airport Land Use Planning Handbook they
developed an accident location database The 2002 handbook provides some idea of
the crash size for general aviation accidents Caltrans determined that the median swath
length for general aviation accidents is only about 100 feet
The average wingspan for gener 1 aviation aircraft is approximately 40 feet If we
assume that the average swath width for general aviation aircraft is similar to the
wingspan then the average crash site size is in the vicinity of 4 000 square feet Le 100
feet of length times 40 feet of width
Additionally Federal Aviation Administration AC 150 5210 6C provides the equation for
calculating the theoretical critical fire area TCA for aircraft crashes These calculations are
used to determine the area around a crashsite that must be isolated from fire The equation
where L aircraft fuselage length and W aircraft fuselage width is a follows
TCA Lx 100 W when L is 65 feet
or
TCA Lx 40 W when Lis 65 feet
The largest design aircraft at FCM is the Cessna Citation III a midsized corporate jet The
Citation III has a fuselage length of 50 feet and a wing span of 53 feet When applying the
11
255
above equation the resulting TCA is 4 650 square feet It is important to note that this is a
conservative calculation because the wingspan was used rather than the fuselage width
Attachment A provides a depiction of a 5 000 square foot circle to scale on the map to provide
perspective It is important to point out that the flight crews of this type of and larger corporate
jet aircraft typically have extensive flight and training backgrounds resulting in fewer aircraft
accidents as compared to small general aviation aircraft As detailed in the November 5 2009
FCM Safety Study Memorandum according to national 2003 NTSB data 69 of accidents were
recreation operations small general aviation aircraft 14 7 were flight instruction 5 were
aerial application and less than 1 were corporate executive operations
The design aircraft for Runway 18 36 at FCM is the Beach Baron 58 With a fuselage width of
approximately 10 feet and a length of approximately 30 feet the TCA for that aircraft is 1 500
square feet Based on the 2025 FCM operations forecast over 60 of the aircraft operations at
FCM would result in a TCA of approximately 2 000 square feet or less The Airport Land Use
Compatibility Manual published by the Minnesota Department of Transportation in September
2006 states the following on page 17 of Appendix 7
Population density has a major affect on the likelihood of a groundling fatality In many
accidents the pilot has some control of the aircraft and has the ability to avoid some
obstacles If the aircraft is small enough and the population density is low enough in
rnany cases the pilot can avoid structures automobiles etc A 2 000 square foot
accident site from a general aviation crash will miss humans in many cases
6 ANALYSIS OF THE DISPOSITION OF EXISTING AND POSSIBLE FUTURE LAND
USES IN THE CONTEXT OF SAFETY ZONES AROUND FCM
When evaluating the need for land use controls around the airport it is important to also
consider the existing land uses in the safety zones and possible future development areas
Because the MAC owns a significant portion of the land contained in State Safety Zones A and
B at FCM there are unique considerations relative to existing and prospective land uses This
section will evaluate the existing and future land uses in the safety zones and further safety
analysis of prospective MAC owned non aeronautical development areas in the safety zones
6 1 Effect of the Park Property AQreement and a NaviQation Aide Clear Zone on the Land
Use Composition within the State Safety Zones around FCM
In an effort to develop FCM in a manner acceptable to the City of Eden Prairie the MAC
negotiated an agreement with the City detailing a number of specifics related to the
development and operation of FCM One of the items included in the agreement was that the
MAC would provide a large approximately 42 acres parcel of land west of Eden Prairie Road
in the Runway 10R State Safety Zone B for Park use by the City In addition the MAC relocated
the VHF Ornni Range Beacon VOR at FCM to a site located in the Runway 28R State A Zone
resulting in the VOR clear area covering much of the Runways 28R and 28L State Safety Zone
A areas From the perspective of providing open space in the safety zones around FCM these
uses of MAC property in the safety zones are significant For instance if the State A and B
Zones are consolidated into one zone beyond the respective RFlZs off each runway end by
virtue of the park agreement the overlapping of RPZs with State Zones on other runways and
the Water areas off the ends of Runway 18 36 a minimum of 20 of the respective State Zones
are dedicated open space
The following table provides a breakdown of the respective open space acreages by virtue of
the park agreement VOR clear area overlapping of RPZs with state zones on other runWays
12
256
and water areas The acreages are contiguous and assumes Zones A and B are combined into
one area beyond the respective RPZs
Table 6 1
Acreage Totals and Percentages in the State Safety Zones by Virtue of Park
W A Agreement OyerJaooinc PRZsand Ooen ater reas
Runway Contiguous Open Space Acreage of Percent of Total
Tyoe Type Acreage
10R Park Area per Aareement 41 63 20 74
10L RPZ Clear Zone 47 80 49 25
28R RPZ Clear Zone 0 24 0 25
28L RPZ Clear Zone 8 00 3 99
28L VOR Clear Area 65 38 32 49
28R VOR Clear Area 40 14 41 15
36 Water 20 93 35 35
18 Water 37 28 63 28
AttachmentA provides a map depicting the land uses in the safety zones around F CM
6 2 Accident Probabilities on Prospective MAC Owned Non Aeronautical Development
Parcelswithin the State Safety Zones
As is detailed in Attachment A there are certain parcels of MAC property located in State Safety
Zones A and B around FCM that are considered possible locations for non aeronautical
development The purpose of these developments is to ensure the future financial viability of the
MAC reliever airport system by diversifying revenue streams in an effort to off set a portion of
rates and charges from reliever airport businesses and tenants
Attachment Bprovides a map depicting the location of prospective MAC owned non
aeronautical development parcels with the accident locations that fall within each of the parcels
based on the accident location data that was provided in the University of Berkeley Study and
the January 2002 Caltrans Airport Land Use Planning Handbook This analysis utilizes the
same accident location data utilized by HNTB in its November 5 2009 FCM Safety Study By
applying the same calculations relative to these areas and accident location data as was done
by HNTB in the FCM Safety Study the following accident probabilities were determined for each
of the prospective development parcels
13
257
Table 6 2
Comparison of Accident Probabilities for Prospective MAC Owned Non Aeronautical
Development Parcels in 2025 to the FAA Collision Standard of One Accident per 10
Million Operations and Years between Accidents
Probability of Accident Probability of
MAC Owned within Development Impacting a Structure
Development Parcels Applying Pilot Control FAA Collision
Parcel without Accounting for Assumption and Standard
Pilot Control and Adjacent Accounting for Adjacent
Open Spaces Open Spaces
A 0 06 0 00 1 00
6 0 44 0 02 1 00
C 1 20 0 06 1 00
D 2 10 0 11 1 00
E 0 39 0 02 1 00
F 0 17 0 01 1 00
G 0 00 0 00 1 00
H 0 56 0 03 1 00
I 0 21 0 01 1 00
J 0 11 0 01 1 00 I
Sources NTSB 1988 2007 data California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook
January 2002 data Figure 3 2 Land Use Guide Plan Map 2030 MAC analysis
The above table provides two probability calculations The first calculation provides the
probability of an aircraft accident anywhere on the respective MAC owned development properties This calculation does not account for the pilot control variable and the adjacent large
contiguous open spaces Moreover this calculation makes an assumption that the entire parcel is covered by structures The second calculation is the probability of impacting a structure within
the respective development parcels taking into account pilot control and the adjacent large
contiguous open spaces as provided by the park agreement VOR clear area overlapping of
RPZs with state zones on other runways and water areas
The probability of aircraft actually impacting structures in the prospective MAC owned non
aeronautical development areas is well below the FAA Collision Standard of one collision per 10
million operations in all cases
7 SUMMARY
Based on the analysis contained in this memorandum the following points detail the main
considerations in the de velopment of the provisions for a draft FCM zoning ordinance
Based on the findings of the November 5 2009 HNTB FCM Safety Study the probability of an aircraft accident in the areas where people could use occupy the land based on the
Land Use Guide Plan Map 2030 in the Eden Prairie Comprehensive Plan Update is well
below the FAA collision standard of one accident per 10 million operations
The Berkeley Study found that in 95 of aircraft accidents around General Aviation GA
airports the pilot had control of the aircraft prior to impact
By virtue of the park agreement VOR clear area overlapping of RPZs with state safety
zones on other runways and water areas when considering the A and B safety zones
as one area outside the RPZ on each runway end maximum contiguous open area
acreages in the respective runway safety zones range from 20 93 acres to 65 38 acres
14
258
A conservative estimate of the crash site area for the largest design aircraft at FCM
Citation III is 5 000 square feet
The RPZ areas along with providing a minimum of 20 acres of contiguous open space
in the remaining State Safety Zones are more than adequate to ensure adequate clear
areas in proximity to the extended runway centerlines around FCM based on the pilot
control statistics and crash site characteristics
Based on the probability calculations foriinpacting a structure applying pilot control
assumption and accounting for adjacent open spaces provided by virtue of the park
agreement VOR clear area overlapping of RPZs with state safety zones on other
runways and water areas the probability of impacting a structure on all of the
prospective MAC owned non aeronautical development properties is well below the FM
Collision Standard of one in 10 million operations
Base d on the findings of the November 5 2009 HNTBFCM Safety Analysis and the
findings of the analyses contained in this memorandum the following are substantiated
points for consideration in providing direction on the framework for the development of a
draft FCM Zoning Ordinance
o The present draft ordinance provisions at STP provide a potential foundation for
the FCM zoning ordinance including
Safety Zone A is co terminus with the Federal Runway Protection Zone
RPZ
Safety Zone B use restrictions do not include site acre structure
limitations and site area to building plot ar ea ratios and population
criteria
Leveraging the FAA 7460 review process as the initial screening process
for the approval of structures in the vicinity of the airport that meet the
FAA s 7460 reviewcriteria
If substantiated by safety and economic analyses allow for the improvement expansion
and development of new residential uses in existing and planned residential land use
areas in Safety Zone B These residential uses would be treated as conforming uses in
the zoning ordinance
Based on the findings of the HNTB FCM Safety Analysis and the analyses contained in
this memorandum an additional zoning provision in Zone B could be developed such
that a minimum of 20 of the total Zone B acreage or 20 acres whichever is greater is
contiguous open space as an added margin of safety
Atthe January 28 2010 FCM JAZB meeting MAC staff will be requesting action from the Board
on the general framework to begin the process of developing a draft FCM Zoning Ordinance for
review by the JAZB at the next Board meeting
15
259
r
i
f r
5
L
i I
b
T
I
j
f
L
j
f
J
5
r
ii
SllN JO
M
6
Jg
Jr
c
C
o
3
J
i
j
0
r
H
m J
l
1
I
I
lXl lHlI
1
i
a Q u o o o 0
8 tJV
it 8 vi 15
i II
GflEV
H
l
ON
t Q
0
E
0
l
I J N
lJ t
0 I J o
i
I
I 1
II
cIl r
b
v
i
if
g
Q
I
i
j
8
J
f
Jl Jl
Q
Q
Iii
Q
L
1
t
J
g
5
Iii
rf i
Q
0
0
t5
a
0
I
j
Q
3
u
t
S
3
0
1
0
0
0
2
1
1
li
iDili
D
J
LJ
ru
E Q
I1l
E
E
Q
R
i
t
rn
g
d
2
oQ
OJ
c
E
ro
oaJ
0
ro
3
cj
j
IEJ
0 Q a o V Q 0 C J
v
lIJI 1
j LL f
t
jP L
0 Q r o I1l a o
Iii
ro
0
a
Qj
g
E
ii r
E
0
0
o
I1l
U
I
v r
E
5
8
t5
ro
2
0
1 4
I1l
1ij
0
OJ
Om
d
ro
f
s
Q
M iiiio
u c o u 0 c e 5
i
lllW ll
frl
10
I
r
n
L
J
J
1r7
t
V
lr
Of
t
f
f
rrr
b
M
A
f
1
JJj
sm
y
l
1
i I
r
f L
I
l
i2
i
W
f
J
1
I
0
a
CI
I1l
I1l
II
Q
Q
J
iil
t
t l
E
c
Co
Co
III
U
a ilL
2 E I1l U J Ol c US
N a a
E g 5
260
f
J ol
o
VO
19 l
lS
l
n9
y
T
g L
I
I
l
I J
t lOUltl
1
j
r
r
T t
r
Il
1
ILl
rr
r
i
i
A
l
II
1
JJ
r
J
r
V
t
0
0
I
y
r
f
i
noo
i
5
I
C
f
i
1
I
J
l
1
y
I
p
l
J
J
i
j
u
OU
i C ltlS I f
n
I
I
4
f I
1
r
t
l Il
vM
i
h
J
1 11
i I
1
n VlllflDII
9N
ll ILS
I I J9
J
I j
1 s T 1
f
y
I
O l
l
l t
f
o
r
r I j I
5
j
j
1 7
1
f
j i
r
11
11
I
y
I
0
I
II
IIYMHI
I
O
r
j
i
I
I
1i
T
5
V
9
JH
S
1
L
8
D
a
j
ll
V
J
H
d
ZU
OL
I I
3 J
J
r I I
I
5
oV
Qj If o o o
OJ E CIl
0
E
0
c
N
J III ex
0 N
I j I
je l
II
ci
I j
o
I I I
c o N co c c E
261
01 28 2010 10 26 FAX 9529341586 CHANHASSEN DT 141001
c
DINNER THEATRES
AIr r Ae I t l
January 26 201 0
n s MAIL FACISIMILE 952 227 1110
Mayor Tom Furlong
City of C hanhassen
7700 Market Blvd
Chanhassell MN 55317
Re International Theatres Corporation d b a Chanhassen Dinner Theatre 501 W 78th Street
Chanhassen Minnesota 55317
SECOND AMENDED WARN NOnCE
Worl er Adjustment and Retrainint Notification WARN Act Notice
Dear Mayor Furlong
On October 15 2009 we issued a Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification W ARN Act Notice indicating that we anticipated the employment site closing on or about December 15 2009 On December 11 2009 we issued an amended WARN notice because the
closing date referenced in my October 15 2009 WARN Act Notice was postponed due to further negotiations
Weare now issuing a second amended WARN Act notice because the closing date in our
December 11 2009 notice was postponed due to further negotiations It is now anticipated that
the closing will occur on a day on or between February 26 and March 11 2010 a 14 day window
If you have any questions please contact lTC s Human Resources Manager Ms Amy Doeden at 952 934 1591 for further information
Sincerely I tZle
501 West 78th Street PO Box 100 Chanhassen MN 55317
9S2 934 1500 Fax 952 934 1511
www chanhassendt com
262
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard
PO Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
Administration
Phone 952 227 1100
Fax 952 227 1110
Building Inspections
Phone 952 227 1180
Fax 952 227 1190
Engineering
Phone 952 227 1160
Fax 952 227 1170
Finance
Phone 952 227 1140
Fax 952 227 1110
Park Recreation
Phone 952 227 1120
Fax 952 227 1110
Recreation Center
2310 Coulter Boulevard
Phone 952 227 1400
Fax 952 227 1404
Planning
Natural Resources
Phone 952 227 1130
Fax 952 227 1110
Public Works
1591 Park Road
Phone 952 227 1300
Fax 952 227 1310
Senior Center
Phone 952227 1125
Fax 952 227 1110
Web Site
www ci chanhassen mn us
MEMORANDUM
TO Mayor
City Council
FROM Greg Sticha Finance Director
DATE February 1 2010
SUBJECT Review of Claims Paid
G
D
The following claims are submitted for review on February 8 2010
Check Numbers Amounts
144082 144234 592 421 87
January Visa charges 38 074 67
Total All Claims 630 496 54
Attachments Check Summary
Check Detail Report
Chanhassen is a Community for Life Provid ng for Today and Planning for Tomorrow 263
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
User danielle
Check Number
144082
144083
144084
144085
144086
144087
144088
144089
144090
144091
144092
144093
144094
144095
144096
144097
144098
144099
144100
144101
144102
144103
144104
144105
144106
144107
144108
144109
144110
144111
144112
144113
144114
144115
144116
144117
144118
144119
144120
144121
144122
144123
144124
144125
144126
144127
144128
144129
144130
144131
144132
144133
144134
144135
144136
144137
144138
144139
144140
144141
144142
144143
Accounts Payable
Checks by Date Summary by Check Number
Printed 02 01 2010 08 10
Summary
Vendor No Vendor Name
andmario Marion Anderson
ANDON ANDON INC
CAPAGE CAP AGENCY
CENENE CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO
DELTOO DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY
DYNAME DYNAMEX DELIVERS NOW
F ACMOT FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY
GerhZach Zachariah J Gerhardt
HA WCHE HAWKINS CHEMICAL
KAPAMARI MARILYN PAT KAPAUN
kidplu Kidd Plumbing Inc
KILELE KILLMER ELECTRIC CO INC
mnucfu Minnesota UC Fund
OerArc Oertel Architects
qualcon Quality Control Integration
SABIDEAN DEAN SABINSKE
SHOTRU SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE
SIGNSO SIGNSOURCE
SPSSLP SPS Companies St Louis Park
STEPLU STEINKRAUS PLUMBING INC
THECON THEIS CONSTRUCTION CO
AARP AARP
AICoff AI s Coffee Company
ASPMIL ASPEN MILLS
BATPLU BATTERIES PLUS
BENEXT BENEFIT EXTRAS INC
BENPRO BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC
BILLS USA SUSAN BILL
BORSTA BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY
COMINT COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN
CORMEC CORPORATE MECHANICAL
CRYTRU Crysteel Truck Equipment
DelDen Delta Dental
EMEAUT EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECH INC
FraRep Franz Reprographics Inc
GENPAR GENERAL PARTS INC
HDsup HD Supply Waterworks LID
integra Integra Telecom
KATFUE KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE
LANEQ 1 Lano Equipment
LECCON LECY CONSTRUCTION
LewiMatt Matt Lewis
L YMLUM LYMAN LUMBER
MOOMED MOORE MEDICAL
MXLog MX Logic
POWCHA POWER SYSTEMS
PreOne PreferredOne Insurance Company
SeaDiv Seaya Diving Inc
SENSYS SENTRY SYSTEMS INC
Southwes Southwest Metro Chamber of Com
SPRPCS SPRINT PCS
STREIC STREICHER S
USABLU USA BLUE BOOK
WhitThom Thomas W White
WINGRICH RICHARD WING
WWGRA WW GRAINGER INC
xcel XCEL ENERGY INC
allwel Alloy Welding Mfg Inc
BITROA BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC
BRAINT BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION
bumstev Steven Michael Burnham
cargra CarteGraph Systems
Check Date
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 21 2010
01 28 2010
01 28 2010
01 28 2010
01 28 2010
01 28 2010
Void Amount
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
Check Amount
48 00
37 41
2 100 00
5 304 35
611 67
53 30
7 46
80 16
15 00
48 00
242 50
1 389 21
75 63
10 565 50
1 500 00
149 75
198 37
189 70
27 84
507 00
33 058 00
140 00
299 20
145 84
4 91
671 25
446 37
71 90
141 82
119 85
848 82
532 43
1 777 20
52 37r93
41 1
155 14 3
366 56 735
31 3
291 06 422
40 750
00 211
65 160
31 145
19 97
00 33
84 37
740 65 66
31 1
104 88 395
00 119
97 89
99 129
43 495
00 35
25 1
088 84 22
34 2
992 50 19
951 83 824
50 525
00 14
000 00 Page
1
264
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
User danielle
Check Number
144144
144145
144146
144147
144148
144149
144150
144151
144152
144153
144154
144155
144156
144157
144158
144159
144160
144161
144162
144163
144164
144165
144166
144167
144168
144169
144170
144171
144172
144173
144174
144175
144176
144177
144178
144179
144180
144181
144182
144183
144184
144185
144186
144187
144188
144189
144190
144191
144192
144193
144194
144195
144196
144197
144198
144199
144200
144201
144202
144203
144204
144205
Accounts Payable
Checks by Date Summary by Check Number
Printed 02 01 2010 08 10
Summary
Vendor No Vendor Name
CENFEN CENTURY FENCE COMPANY
DA YCON DA YCO CONCRETE COMPANY
DeepRock Deep Rock Water Company
Fabcon Fabcon
FreCon Frerichs Construction Company
GenRya Genz Ryan Plumbing Heating
GenShe General Sheet Metal Company L
GriCon Griggs Contracting Inc
HARTRE HARTMAN TREE FARM
KIMHOR KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC
LITF AL LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC
MinnPlum Minnetonka Plumbing Inc
ModGar Modem Garages Interiors
MolCon Molin Concrete Products Co In
MulCon Multiple Concepts Interior
OLSCAB OLSON CABINETS WOODWORKING
PATCO PATRICK CO
PraEdg Prairie s Edge Inc
PUMMET PUMP AND METER SERVICES INC
RJMCON RJM CONSTRUCTION
RTLCon RTL Construction Inc
SIGNSO SIGNSOURCE
SOFHOU SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL
SRFCON SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC
StePai Steinbrecher Painting Inc
STOFF S T OFFICE PRODUCTS
WSB WSB ASSOCIATES INC
xce1 XCEL ENERGY INC
10000 10 000 Lakes Chapter
ANCTEC ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER
APMP Assoc of Public Manager Prof
ASBENE ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
ASPEQU Aspen Equipment
ATTAZ AT T CONSUMER LEASE SERVICES
BEBEALAN ALAN BEBEL
BoleChri Christopher Boles
BRAINT BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION
CCFDMA CCFDMAA
ChaTil Chard Tiling Excavating Inc
Choice Choice Inc
CLASAF CLAREY S SAFETY EQUIPMENT INC
CUMNOR CUMMINS NORTH CENTRAL
dicsan Dick s Sanitation Inc
DISSTE DISCOUNT STEEL INC
DUNSCAROCAROLDUNSMORE
EHLERS EHLERS ASSOCIATES INC
EMEAPP EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT INC
FACMOT FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY
GOETDUANDUANEGOETZE
hach I Iach Company
HA WCHE HAWKINS CHEMICAL
HDsup HD SuppJyWaterworks LTD
HENCOU HENNEPIN COUNTY
HENEQU HENNEN EQUIPMENT INC
HENTEC HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE
Hortal Horizon Talent Agency
IntLoss Integrated Loss Control Inc
KENGRA KENNEDY GRAVEN CHARTERED
KINDDEBR DEBRA KIND
LewiMatt Matt Lewis
MACTA MACTA
METATH METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY
Check Date
01 28 2010
01 28120 I 0
01 28 2010
01 28 20 I 0
01 28 2010
01 28 20 I 0
01 28 2010
01 28 20 I 0
01 28 2010
01 28 2010
01 28 2010
01 28 2010
01 28 2010
01 28 20 I 0
01 2812010
01 28 2010
01 2812010
01 28 2010
01 28 20 I 0
01 2812010
01 28 20 I 0
01 28 2010
01 2812010
01 28 2010
01 28 2010
01 2812010
01 28 2010
01 28 2010
01 28 20 I 0
01 2812010
01 28 2010
01 2812010
01 2812010
01 28 2010
01 28 2010
01 28 2010
01 28 20 I 0
01 28 2010
01 28 2010
01 28 2010
01 28 2010
01 28 20 I 0
01 28 20 10
01 28 20 I 0
01 2812010
01 28 2010
01 28 20 I 0
01 28 2010
01 28 20 I 0
01 28 20 I 0
01 28 2010
01 28 2010
01 28 20 I 0
01 28 20 I 0
01 2812010
01 2812010
01 28 2010
01 28 2010
01 28 2010
01 28 2010
01 28 2010
01 28 2010
Void Amount
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
Check Amount
1 900 00
858 80
94 96
34 700 25
25 511 00
152 40
8 806 73
17 100 00
15 732 80
6 149 34
469 81
75 277 68
1 211 25
1 045 00
257 45
llO OO
517 40
1 705 25
11 788 30
69 414 46
481 65
37 41
791 95
2 988 68
19 559 55
49 258 61
1 516 00
8 788 24
115 00
105 15
15 00
1 271 78
19 43
14 67
770 00
163 50
1 345 25
150 00
9 697 97
160 58
820 58
1 279 00
904 05
2 019 94
46 01
245 00
70 12
52 32
260 86
589 09
11 078 02
6 000 88
1 166 05
49 51
5 241 68
500 00
1 321 00
88 00
467 50
178 75
25 00
78 98
Page 2
265
CITY OF CHANHASSEN Accounts Payable Printed 02 01 20 I 0 08 10
User danielle Checks by Date Summary by Check Number Summary
Check Number Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Amount Check Amount
144206 MetBlo Metro Blooms 01 28 2010 0 00 1 000 00
144207 MINV AL MINV ALCO INC 01 28 2010 0 00 144 37
144208 MNCHIL MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CTR 01 28 2010 0 00 358 09
144209 MNHEAL MN DEPT OF HEALTH 01 28 2010 0 00 175 00
144210 MNLIFE MINNESOTA LIFE 01 28 2010 0 00 1 145 89
144211 mvec MN V ALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 01 28 2010 0 00 732 79
144212 NahaShel Shelley Nahan 01 28 2010 0 00 125 00
144213 NAPA NAPA AUTO TRUCK PARTS 01 28 2010 0 00 154 57
144214 NEXTEL NEXTEL 01 28 2010 0 00 3 270 51
144215 PAL WES PALMER WEST CONSTRUCTION 01 28 2010 0 00 519 00
144216 P JPro P J Promotions 01 28 2010 0 00 918 00
144217 PlutBrad Brad Pluth 01 28 2010 0 00 97 50
144218 POST POSTMASTER 01 28 2010 0 00 688 48
144219 QUAFLO Quality Flow Systems Inc 01 28 2010 0 00 1 501 44
144220 ROTCLU ROTARY CLUB OF CHANHASSEN 01 28 2010 0 00 131 00
144221 SENSYS SENTRY SYSTEMS INe 01 28 2010 0 00 555 64
144222 SPRPCS SPRINT PCS 01 28 2010 0 00 126 43
144223 SPSSLP SPS Companies St Louis Park 01 28 2010 0 00 14 71
144224 StaCon Staples Contract Commercial 01 28 2010 0 00 262 61
144225 STESIE STEVE SIEGLE REPAIR 01 28 2010 0 00 180 00
144226 STREIC STREICHER S 01 28 2010 0 00 120 78
144227 SULUTI SULLIVAN S UTILITY SERVo INC 01 28 2010 0 00 221 36
144228 TOLGAS TOLL GAS WELDING SUPPLY 01 28 2010 0 00 238 00
144229 USABLU USA BLUE BOOK 01 28 2010 0 00 332 05
144230 VICREP VICTORIA REPAIR MFG 01 28 2010 0 00 1 521 90
144231 WACDOD W ACONIA DODGE 01 28 2010 0 00 62 39
144232 W ASCOU WASHINGTON COUNTY 01 28 2010 0 00 15 21
144233 WWGRA WW GRAINGER INC 01 28 2010 0 00 1 794 86
144234 xcel XCEL ENERGY INC 01 28 2010 0 00 21 974 48
Report Total 0 00 592 421 87
Page 3
266
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danielle
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
Amount
10 000 Lakes Chapter
10000 10 000 Lakes Chapter
Ck 144172 01 28 10
Inv 01251O
Line Item Date
01 25 10
Inv 01251O Total
Line Item Description
Governmental Membership
Line Item Account
101 1250 4360 115 00
115 00
Ck 144172 Total 115 00
10000 10 000 Lakes Chapter 115 00
10 000 Lakes Chapter 115 00
AARP
AARP AARP
Ck 144103
Inv 01191O
Line Item Date
01 19 10
Inv 011910 Total
01 21 10
Line Item DescriPtion
Defensive Driving 1 13 1 20 10
Line Item Account
101 1560 4300 140 00
140 00
Ck 144103 Total 140 00
AARP AARP 140 00
AARP 140 00
AI s Coffee Company
AICoff AI s Coffee Company
Ck 144104 01 21 10
Inv 011510
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 15 10 Coffee
Inv 011510 Total
Line Item Account
101 1170 4110 299 20
299 20
Ck 144104 Total 299 20
AICoff AI s Coffee Company 299 20
AI s Coffee Company 299 20
Alloy WeJding Mfg Inc
allwel Alloy WeJding Mfg Inc
Ck 144139 01 28 10
Inv 20172
Line Item Date
12 30 09
Inv 20172 Total
Line Item Description
R0l520 DH Scrap Metal Dumpster
Line Item Account
421 0000 4120 2 992 50
2 992 50
Ck 144139 Total 2 992 50
allweJ Alloy Welding Mfg Inc 2 992 50
Alloy Welding Mfg Inc 2 992 50
Page I
267
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danielle
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
Amount
ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER
ANCTEC ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER
Ck 144173 01 28 10
Iny 13473
Line Item Date
01 18 10
Iny 13473 Total
Line Item DescriPtion
Volume Control is bad freq is off
Line Item Account
101 1220 4531 105 15
105 15
Ck 144173 Total 105 15
ANCTEC ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 105 15
ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 105 15
Anderson Marion
andmario Anderson Marion
Ck 144082 01 21 10
Iny 113009
Line Item Date
11 30 09
Iny 113009 Total
Line Item Description
Refund Owatonna Discoyer It s Faces Pla
Line Item Account
101 1560 3637 48 00
48 00
Ck 144082 Total 48 00
andmario Anderson Marion 48 00
Anderson Marion 48 00
ANDONINC
ANDON ANDON INC
Ck 144083 01 21 10
Iny 186629
Line Item Date
12 01 09
Inv 186629 Total
Line Item Description
Cyls on hand
Line Item Account
101 1220 4290 37 41
37 41
Ck 144083 Total 37 41
ANDON ANDONINC 37 41
ANDONINC 37 41
Aspen Equipment
ASPEQU Aspen Equipment
Ck 144176 01 28 10
Iny 10065041
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 20 1 0 Seal Kit
Iny 10065041 Total
Line Item Account
101 1320 4120 19 43
19 43
Ck 144176 Total 19 43
ASPEQU Aspen Equipment 19 43
Aspen Equipment 19 43
Page 2
268
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danielle
ASPEN MILLS
ASPMIL ASPEN MILLS
Ck 144105 01 21 10
Iny 94895
Line Item Date
01 12 10
Inv 94895 Total
Ck 144105 Total
ASPMIL
ASPEN MILLS
Line Item Description
Shirts with patches
ASPEN MILLS
Assoc of Public Manager Prof
APMP Assoc of Public Manager Prof
Ck 144174 01 28 10
Iny 01271O
Line Item Date
01 27 10
Iny 012710 Total
Ck 144174 Total
APMP
Line Item Description
02 11 10 APMP Meeting
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
Amount
Line Item Account
101 1220 4240 145 84
145 84
145 84
145 84
145 84
Line Item Account
101 1120 4370 15 00
15 00
15 00
Assoc of Public Manager Prof
Assoc of Public Manager Prof
15 00
ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
ASBENE ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
Ck 144175 01 28 10
Iny 012210
Line Item Date
01 22 10
01 22 10
01 22 10
01 22 10
01 22 10
01 22 10
01 22 1 0
01 22 10
01 22 10
01 22 1 0
01 22 10
01 22 10
01 22 10
01 22 10
01 22 10
01 22 10
01 22 1 0
01 22 10
01 22 10
01 22 10
01 22 10
01 22 1 0
01 22 10
Inv 01221O Total
Line Item Description
Feb 2010 Charges
Feb 2010 Charges
Feb 2010 Charges
Feb 2010 Charges
Feb 2010 Charges
Feb 2010 Charges
Feb 2010 Charges
Feb 2010 Charges
Feb 2010 Charges
Feb 2010 Charges
Feb 2010 Charges
Feb 2010 Charges
Feb 2010 Charges
Feb 2010 Charges
Feb 2010 Charges
Feb 2010 Charges
Feb 2010 Charges
Feb 2010 Charges
Feb 2010 Charges
Feb 2010 Charges
Feb 2010 Charges
Feb 2010 Charges
Feb 2010 Charges
15 00
Line Item Account
10 1 1430 4040
720 7201 4040
720 7202 4040
101 1700 4040
101 1170 4040
101 1530 4040
101 1210 4040
210 0000 4040
101 1600 4040
101 1520 4040
720 0000 4040
101 1220 4040
10 1 1160 4040
101 1370 4040
101 1130 4040
701 0000 4040
101 1420 4040
101 1120 4040
700 0000 4040
10 1 1310 4040
101 1550 4040
101 1250 4040
101 13 20 4040
5 29
6 52
6 52
6 66
15 22
16 15
18 62
21 05
26 64
29 85
37 86
40 07
40 69
40 91
52 94
79 35
91 45
92 59
95 43
112 21
134 43
149 21
152 12
1 271 78
Page 3
269
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danielle
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
Ck 144175 Total
Amount
1 271 78
ASBENE ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1 271 78
ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1 271 78
AT T CONSUMER LEASE SERVICES
ATTAZ AT T CONSUMER LEASE SERVICES
Ck 144177 01 28 10
InY 011410
Line Item Date
01 14 10
01 14 10
Iny 011410 Total
Line Item Description
Traditional Rotary Telephone
Traditional Rotary Telephone
Line Item Account
701 0000 4310
700 0000 4310
7 33
7 34
14 67
Ck 144177 Total 14 67
ATTAZ AT T CONSUMER LEASE SERVICES 14 67
AT T CONSUMER LEASE SERVICES 14 67
BATTERIES PLUS
BATPLU BATTERIES PLUS
Ck 144106 01 21 10
InY 20166137
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 13 10 Duracell12V Alkaline 2PK
InY 20166137 Total
Line Item Account
101 1220 4530 4 91
4 91
Ck 144106 Total 4 91
BATPLU BATTERIES PLUS 4 91
BATTERIES PLUS 4 91
BEBEL ALAN
BEBEALAN BEBEL ALAN
Ck 144178 01128 10
InY 01121O
Line Item Date
01 12 10
Iny 011210 Total
Line Item Description
Cat Excayator hours Chan operated
Line Item Account
700 0000 4552 770 00
770 00
Ck 144178 Total 770 00
BEBEALAN BEBEL ALAN 770 00
BEBEL ALAN 770 00
BENEFIT EXTRAS INC
BENEXT BENEFIT EXTRAS INC
Ck 144107 01121 10
Iny 33268
Line Item Date
01112 10
01 12 10
Iny 33268 Total
Line Item Description
Monthly COBRA Fees
Monthly COBRA Fees
Line Item Account
101 0000 2012
101 1120 4300
183 75
487 50
671 25
Page 4
270
BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC
BENPRO BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC
Ck 144108 01 21 10
Iny 092309
Line Item Date
09 23 09
Iny 092309 Total
CITY OF CHANHAS
User daoielle
Ck 144107 Total
BENEXT
BENEFIT EXTRAS INC
Iny 134954
Line Item Date
01 16110
Iny 134954 Total
Ck 144108 Total
BENPRO
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
Amount
671 25
BENEFIT EXTRAS INC 671 25
671 25
Line Item Description
CR Mowing 6590 6600 6610 Minnewashta
Line Item Account
101 1260 3903 290 01
290 01
Line Item Descriotion
Chao Medical Arts Axel s Snowplowing
Line Item Account
101 1550 4300 736 38
736 38
446 37
BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC 446 37
BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC 446 37
BILL SUSAN
BILLSUSA BILL SUSAN
Ck 144109 01 21 10
InY 01171O
Line Item Date
01 17 10
Iny 011710 Total
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC
BITROA BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC
Ck 144140 01 28 10
Iny 123109
Line Item Date
12 31 09
Iny 123109 Total
Ck 144109 Total
BILLSUSA
BILL SUSAN
Ck 144140 Total
BITROA
Line Item Description
Sam s Club Reimbursement
Line Item Account
101 1560 4130 71 90
71 90
71 90
BILL SUSAN 71 90
71 90
Line Item Description
Chao Public Works Asphalt PaYing
Line Item Account
421 0000 4751 19 951 83
19 951 83
19 951 83
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC 19 951 83
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC 19 951 83
Page 5
271
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danielle
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
Amount
Boles Christopher
BoleChri Boles Christopher
Ck 144179 01 28 10
InY 012710
Line Item Date
01 27 1 0
InY 012710 Total
Line Item Description
Personal Training Skaija Ramachandran
Line Item Account
101 1533 4300 163 50
163 50
Ck 144179 Total 163 50
BoleChri Boles Christopher 163 50
Boles Christopher 163 50
BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY
BORSTA BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY
Ck 144110 01 21 10
Iny 900337316
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 06 10 70W HPS Quad Ballast
Iny 900337316 Total
Line Item Account
701 0000 4510 141 82
141 82
Ck 144110 Total 141 82
BORSTA BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 141 82
BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 141 82
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION
BRAINT BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION
Ck 144141 01 28 10
InY 123109
Line Item Date
12 31 09
Iny 123109 Total
Line Item Description
Chanhassen Public Works Testing
Line Item Account
421 0000 4300 824 50
824 50
Ck 144141 Total 824 50
Ck 144180
Iny 316685
Line Item Date
01 13 10
Iny 316685 Total
01 28 10
Line Item Description
Electric Vault 14 Soil Boring
Line Item Account
700 7025 4300 1 345 25
1 345 25
Ck 144180 Total 1 345 25
BRAINT BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 2 169 75
BRAUNINTERTECCORPORATION 2 169 75
Burnham Steven Michael
burnstey Burnham Steven Michael
Ck 144142 01 28 10
InY 011209
Line Item Date
01 12 09
Iny 011209 Total
Line Item Description
Chey Silyerado Hail Damage Repair
Line Item Account
400 0000 4520 525 00
525 00
Page 6
272
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danielle
Ck 144142 Total
burnstev
Burnham Steven Michael
Burnham Steven Michael
CAP AGENCY
CAPAGE CAP AGENCY
Ck 144084 01 21 10
Inv 1000747
Line Item Date Line Item Description
12 31 09 4th Quart Services
Inv 1000747 Total
Ck 144084 Total
CAPAGE
CAP AGENCY
CAP AGENCY
CarteGraph Systems
cargra CarteGraph Systems
Ck 144143 01 28 10
Iny 32056
Line Item Date
12 31 09
Iny 32056 Total
Ck 144143 Total
cargra
CarteGraph Systems
CCFDMAA
CCFDMA CCFDMAA
Ck 144181 01 28 10
InY 201005
Line Item Date
01 14 10
InY 201005 Total
Ck 144181 Total
CCFDMA
CCFDMAA
Line Item Description
CarteGraph Software Licenses
CarteGraph Systems
Line Item Description
2010 Annual Dues
CCFDMAA
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
Amount
525 00
525 00
525 00
Line Item Account
101 1430 4300 2 100 00
2 100 00
2 100 00
2 100 00
2 100 00
Line Item Account
400 4117 4703 14 000 00
14 000 00
14 000 00
14 000 00
14 000 00
Line Item Account
101 1220 4360 150 00
150 00
150 00
150 00
150 00
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO
CENENE CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO
Ck 144085 01 21 10
InY OI0810
Line Item Date
01 08 1 0
01 08 10
01 08 10
01 08 10
01 08 10
01 08 10
Line Item Description
Dec 2009 Charges
Dec 2009 Charges
Dec 2009 Charges
Dec 2009 Charges
Dec 2009 Charges
Dec 2009 Charges
Line Item Account
101 1551 4320
700 0000 4320
701 0000 4320
101 1530 4320
101 1220 4320
101 1370 4320
81 76
358 41
358 41
440 98
1 197 51
2 867 28
Page 7
273
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danielle
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
Iny Ol081O Total
Amount
5 304 35
Ck 144085 Total 5 304 35
CENENE CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 5 304 35
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 5 304 35
CENTURY FENCE COMPANY
CENFEN CENTURY FENCE COMPANY
Ck 144144 01 28 10
Iny 123109
Line Item Date Line Item Description
12 31 09 Chan Public Works Fences Gates
Iny 123109 Total
Line Item Account
421 0000 4751 1 900 00
1 900 00
Ck 144144 Total 1 900 00
CENFEN CENTURY FENCE COMPANY 1 900 00
CENTURY FENCE COMPANY 1 900 00
Chard Tiling Excavating Inc
ChaTil Chard Tiling Excavating Inc
Ck 144182 01 28 10
Iny 4
Line Item Date
01 20 1 0
Iny 4 Total
Line Item Description
City Improyement Project 09 01
Line Item Account
601 6019 4751 9 697 97
9 697 97
Ck 144182 Total 9 697 97
ChaTil Chard Tiling Excavating Inc 9 697 97
Chard Tiling Excavating Inc 9 697 97
Choice Inc
Choice Choice Inc Account 101 1220 4350
Ck 144183 01 28 10
Iny 011210
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 12 10 Chan Fire Station
Iny 011210 Total
Line Item Account
101 1220 4350 160 58
160 58
Ck 144183 Total 160 58
Choice Choice Inc 160 58
Choice Inc 160 58
CLAREY S SAFETY EQUIPMENT INC
CLASAF CLAREY S SAFETY EQUIPMENT INC
Ck 144184 01 28 10
Iny 131091
Line Item Date
01 16 10
Iny 131091 Total
Line Item Description
RAE Sensors Multi Rae RAE LEL Sensor
Line Item Account
101 1220 4530 820 58
820 58
Page 8
274
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danielle
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
Ck 144184 Total
Amount
820 58
CLASAF CLAREY S SAFETY EQUIPMENT INC 820 58
CLAREY S SAFETY EQUIPMENT INC 82o s8
COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN
COMINT COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN
Ck 144111 01 21 10
Iny 1813645
Line Item Date Line Item Description
12 31 09 Website host fees storage stat srvc Jan
Iny IS13645 Total
Line Item Account
101 1160 4300 119 85
119 85
Ck 144111 Total 119 85
COMINT COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN 119 85
COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN 119 85
CORPORATE MECHANICAL
CORMEC CORPORATE MECHANICAL
Ck 144112 01 21 10
Iny 138306
Line Item Date
01 07 10
Iny 138306 Total
Line Item Description
Computer Room Unit Down Repair
Line Item Account
101 1170 4530 848 82
848 82
Ck 144112 Total 848 82
CORMEC CORPORATE MECHANICAL 848 82
CORPORATE MECHANICAL 848 82
Crysteel Truck Equipment
CRYTRU Crysteel Truck Equipment
Ck 144113 01 21 10
Iny FPI35602
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 05 10 Wing Cylinder
InY FP135602 Totw
Line Item Account
101 1320 4120 532 43
532 43
Ck 144113 Total 532 43
CRYTRU Crysteel Truck Equipment 532 43
Crysteel Truck Equipment 532 43
CUMMINS NORTH CENTRAL
CUMNOR CUMMINS NORTH CENTRAL
Ck 144185 01 28 10
Iny 10043532
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 22 10 Generatorrepair
Iny 10043532 Total
Line Item Account
700 0000 4530 1 279 00
1 279 00
Ck 144185 Total 1 279 00
Page 9
275
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danielle
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
CUMNOR CUMMINS NORTH CENTRAL
Amount
1 279 00
CUMMINS NORTH CENTRAL 1 279 00
DAYCO CONCRETE COMPANY
DAYCON DAYCO CONCRETE COMPANY
Ck 144145 01 28 10
Iny 123109
Line Item Date
12 31 09
Iny 123109 Total
Line Item DescriPtion
Chan Public Works Concrete Masonry
Line Item Account
421 0000 4751 858 80
858 80
Ck 144145 Total 858 80
DAYCON DAYCO CONCRETE COMPANY 858 80
DAYCO CONCRETE COMPANY 858 80
Deep Rock Water Company
DeepRock Deep Rock Water Company
Ck 144146 01 28 10
Iny 6890032 6917862
Line Item Date Line Item DescriPtion
12 28 09 Rm Temp Cold Cooler Cups
Iny 6890032 6917862 Total
Line Item Account
101 1550 4120 94 96
94 96
Ck 144146 Total 94 96
DeepRock Deep Rock Water Company 94 96
Deep Rock Water Company 94 96
DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY
DELTOO DELEGARDTOOLCOMPANY
Ck 144086 01 21 10
Iny 445196
Line Item Date
12 31 09
Iny 445196 Total
Line Item Description
Plier Hmmr Chisl Tool Cart Uniy SpIn Set
Line Item Account
101 1320 4120 493 24
493 24
Iny 445200
Line Item Date Line Item Description
12 31 09 15 PC Met Std
Iny 445200 Total
Line Item Account
101 1320 4120 118 43
118 43
Ck 144086 Total 611 67
DEL TOO DELEGARDTOOLCOMPANY 611 67
DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 611 67
Delta Dental
DelDen Delta Dental
Ck 144114 01 21 10
Iny 4369089
Line Item Date
01 15 10
01 15 10
01 15 10
Line Item Description
Feb 2010 Premiums
Feb 2010 Premiums
Feb 2010 Premiums COBRA
Line Item Account
720 0000 2013
701 0000 2013
10 1 0000 20 13
50 23
75 40
181 50
Page 10
276
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danielle
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 1 0
01 15110 Feb 2010 Premiums
01 15110 Feb 2010 Premiums
InY 4369089 Totm
700 0000 2013
101 0000 2013
Amount
222 60
1 247 47
1 777 20
Ck 144114 Totm 1 777 20
DelDen Delta Dental 1 777 20
Delta Dental 1 777 20
Dick s Sanitation Ine
diesan Dick s Sanitation Ine
Ck 144186 01 28 10
Iny 1066187
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 20 10 Library Feb 2010 Charges
Iny 1066187 Total
diesan Dick s Sanitation Ine
Line Item Account
101 1190 4350 197 99
197 99
Line Item Account
101 1170 4350 132 89
132 89
Line Item Account
101 1220 4350 45 05
45 05
Line Item Account
101 1370 4350 152 73
152 73
Line Item Account
101 1550 4350 316 19
316 19
Line Item Account
101 1220 4350 59 20
59 20
904 05
904 05
904 05
Iny 1066188
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 20110 City Hall Feb 2010 Charges
Iny 1066188 Total
Iny 1066189
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 20110 West Fire Station Feb 2010 Charges
Iny 1066189 Total
Iny 1066190
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 20 10 Public Works Bldg Feb 2010 Charges
Iny 1066190 Total
Inv 1066191
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 2011 0 Park Feb 2010 Charges
Iny 1066191 Total
Iny 1066192
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 20 10 Main Fire Feb 2010 Charges
Iny 1066192 Total
Ck 144186 Total
Dick s Sanitation Ine
DISCOUNT STEEL INC
DISSTE DISCOUNT STEEL INC
Ck 144187 01 28110
Iny 1571953
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 07 10 Steel Coyer new public works building
Iny 1571953 Total
Line Item Account
421 0000 4120 2 019 94
2 019 94
Ck 144187 Total 2 019 94
Page 11
277
DUNSMORE CAROL
DUNSCARO DUNSMORE CAROL
Ck 144188 01 28 10
JnY 01211O
Line Item Date
01 21 10
Jny 012110 Total
DYNAMEX DELIVERS NOW
DYNAME DYNAMEXDELIVERSNOW
Ck 144087 01 21 10
Iny 610427
Line Item Date
12 31 09
InY 610427 Total
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danielle
DISSTE
DISCOUNT STEEL INC
Ck 144188 Total
DUNSCARO
DUNSMORE CAROL
Ck 144087 Total
DYNAME
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
DISCOUNT STEEL INC
Amount
2 019 94
2 019 94
Line Item Description
Reimbursement Costco purchases
Line Item Account
101 1250 4130 46 01
46 01
46 01
DUNSMORE CAROL 46 01
46 01
Line Item Description
Deliyery to MN Dept of Health St Paul
Line Item Account
700 0000 4330 53 30
53 30
53 30
DYNAMEX DELIVERS NOW 53 30
DYNAMEX DELIVERS NOW 53 30
EHLERS ASSOCIATES INC
EHLERS EHLERS ASSOCIATES INC
Ck 144189 01 28 10
JnY 01261O
Line Item Date
01 26 1 0
InY 012610 Total
Ck 144189 Total
EHLERS
Line Item Description
Seminar Registration
Line Item Account
101 1120 4370 245 00
245 00
245 00
EHLERS ASSOCIATES INC 245 00
EHLERS ASSOCIATES INC 245 00
EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT INC
EMEAPP EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT INC
Ck 144190 01 28 10
InY 46813
Line Item Date
01 18 10
JnY 46813 Total
Ck 144190 Total
EMEAPP
Line Item Description
Rocker Switches for Fire Dept s Spartan
Line Item Account
101 1220 4520 70 12
70 12
70 12
EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT INC 70 12
Page 12
278
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danieIle
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT INC
Amount
70 12
EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECH INC
EMEAUT EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECH INC
Ck 144115 01 21 10
Iny CSOI0710 3
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 07 10 Stop Tail Assy
Iny CS010710 3 Total
Line Item Account
101 1320 4140 52 37
52 37
Ck 144115 Total 52 37
EMEAUT EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECH INC 52 37
EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECH INC 52 37
Fabcon
Fabcon Fabcon
Ck 144147
InY 123109
Line Item Date
12 31 09
Iny 123 109 Total
01 28 10
Line Item Description
Chan Public Works Precast Concrete Wall
Line Item Account
421 0000 475 I 34 700 25
34 700 25
Ck 144147 Total 34 700 25
Fabcon Fabcon 34 700 25
Fabcon 34 700 25
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY
FACMOT FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY
Ck 144088 01 21 10
Iny 13253865
Line Item Date Line Item Description
12 30 09 Credit for battery cores
Iny 13253865 Total
Line Item Account
101 1320 4120 25 00
25 00
Iny 69002086
Line Item Date Line Item Description
12 29 09 Sensor CmlSh C
Iny 69002086 Total
Line Item Account
700 0000 4120 32 46
32 46
Ck 144088 Total 7 46
Ck 144191 01 28 10
Iny 13263302
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 13 10 Battery CCA500
Iny 13263302 Total
Line Item Account
700 0000 4120 62 82
62 82
Inv 13264855
Line Item Date Line Item Descriotion
01 14 10 Core Return
Inv 13264855 Total
Line Item Account
101 1320 4120 10 50
10 50
Ck 144191 Total 52 32
Page 13
279
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danielle
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
FACMOT FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY
Amount
59 78
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 59 78
Franz Reprographics Inc
FraRep Franz Reprographics Inc
Ck 144116 01 21 10
Iny 78184
Line Item Date
01 08 10
Iny 78184 Total
Line Item Description
100 YDS 24 LB Color Premium Bond
Line Item Account
101 1170 4110 93 41
93 41
Ck 144116 Total 93 41
FraRep Franz Reprograpbics Inc 93 41
Franz Reprograpbics Inc 93 41
Frericbs Construction Company
FreCon Frericbs Construction Company
Ck 144148 01 28 10
InY 123109
Line Item Date
12 31 09
Iny 123109 Total
Line Item Description
Chan Public Works Carpentry MilIwork Line Item Account
421 0000 4751 25 511 00
25 511 00
Ck 144148 Total 25 511 00
FreCon Frericbs Construction Company 25 511 00
Frericbs Construction Company 25 511 00
GENERAL PARTS INC
GENPAR GENERAL PARTS INC
Ck 144117 01 21 10
Iny 5208561
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 12 10 Repair freezer Meals On Wheels
InY 5208561 Total
Line Item Account
101 1170 4530 1 155 14
1 155 14
Ck 144117 Total 1 155 14
GENPAR GENERAL PARTS INC 1 155 14
GENERAL PARTS INC 1 155 14
General Sheet Metal Company L
GenSbe General Sbeet Metal Company L
Ck 144150 01 28 10
Iny 123109
Line Item Date
12 31 09
Iny 123109 Total
Line Item Description
Chan Public Works HV AC
Line Item Account
421 0000 4751 8 806 73
8 806 73
Ck 144150 Total 8 806 73
GenShe General Sbeet Metal Company L 8 806 73
Page 14
280
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danielle
General Sheet Metal Company L
Genz Ryan Plumbing Heating
GenRya Genz Ryan Plumbing Heating
Ck 144149 01 28 10
Inv 012710
Line Item Date
01 27 10
0112711 0
Inv 012710 Total
Ck 144149 Total
GenRya
Line Item Description
Duplicate permit refund
Duplicate permit refund
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
Amount
8 806 73
Line Item Account
101 0000 2022
101 1250 3305
3 15
149 25
152 40
152 40
Genz Ryan Plumbing Heating
Genz Ryan Plumbing Heating
152 40
Gerhardt Zachariah J
GerhZach Gerhardt Zachariah J
Ck 144089 01 21 10
Inv 30
Line Item Date
12 29 09
Inv 30 Total
Ck 144089 Total
GerhZach
Gerhardt Zachariah J
Line Item Description
Tail lamp 1987 Lincoln
Gerhardt Zachariah J
GOETZE DUANE
GOETDUAN GOETZE DUANE
Ck 144192 01 28 10
Inv 123009
Line Item Date
12 30 09
Inv 123009 Total
Ck 144192 Total
GOETDUAN
GOETZE DUANE
Line Item Description
Clothing Reimbursement
GOETZE DUANE
Griggs Contracting Inc
GriCon Griggs Contracting Inc
Ck 144151 01 28 10
Inv 123109
Line Item Date
12 31 09
Inv 123109 Total
Ck 144151 Total
GriCon
Line Item Description
Chan Public Works Fuel Island
Griggs Contracting Inc
152 40
Line Item Account
101 1170 4483 80 16
80 16
80 16
80 16
80 16
Line Item Account
101 1370 4240 260 86
260 86
260 86
260 86
260 86
Line Item Account
421 0000 4751 17 100 00
17 100 00
17 100 00
17 100 00
Page 15
281
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danielle
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
Griggs Contracting Inc
Amount
17 100 00
Hach Company
hach Hach Company
Ck 144193 01 28 10
Inv 6559303
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 11 10 Gear Motor Assy Reagent
Inv 6559303 Total
Line Item Account
700 7019 4530 589 09
589 09
Ck 144193 Total 589 09
hach Hach Company 589 09
Hach Company 589 09
HARTMAN TREE FARM
HARTRE HARTMAN TREE FARM
Ck 144152 01 28 10
Inv 6493 1
Line Item Date
10 01 09
Inv 6493 1 Total
Line Item Description
Installation of trees plants
Line Item Account
421 0000 4300 12 761 80
12 761 80
Inv 6493 2
Line Item Date
1 1 09
Inv 6493 2 Total
Line Item Description
Installation mulch edging
Line Item Account
421 0000 4300 2 971 00
2 971 00
Ck 144152 Total 15 732 80
HARTRE HARTMAN TREE FARM 15 732 80
HARTMAN TREE FARM 15 732 80
HAWKINS CHEMICAL
HA WCHE HAWKINS CHEMICAL
Ck 144090 01 21 10
Inv 3083248RI
Line Item Date Line Item Description
12 31 09 Chlorine Cylinder
Inv 3083248RI Total
Line Item Account
700 0000 4160 15 00
15 00
Ck 144090 Total 15 00
Ck 144194 01 28 10
Inv 3087498RI
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 19 1 0 Hydrofluosilicic Acid Sodium Permangana
Inv 3087498RI Total
Line Item Account
700 0000 4 I 60 11 078 02
1l 078 02
Ck 144194 Total 1l 078 02
HA WCHE HAWKINS CHEMICAL 11 093 02
HAWKINS CHEMICAL 11 093 02
Page 16
282
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danielle
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
HD Supply Waterworks L TD
HDsup HD Supply Waterworks L TD
Ck 144118 01 21 10
Iny 9968758
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 06 10 1000G Mtr Nonpit MXU Sgl Port Wired Uni
InY 9968758 Tot
Amount
Line Item Account
700 0000 4250 3 366 56
3 366 56
Ck 144118 Total 3 366 56
Ck 144195 01 28 10
Iny 9991556
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 13 10 HydrantsNalyes
InY 9991556 Total
Line Item Account
700 0000 4550 6 000 88
6 000 88
Ck 144195 Total 6 000 88
HDsup HD Supply Waterworks L TD 9 367 44
HD Supply Waterworks L TD 9 367 44
HENNEN EQUIPMENT INC
HENEQU HENNEN EQUIPMENT INC
Ck 144197 01 28 10
Iny 15644
Line Item Date
01 15 10
Iny 15644 Total
Line Item Description
Shear shop supplies
Line Item Account
101 1320 4120 49 51
49 51
Ck 144197 Total 49 51
HENEQU HENNEN EQUIPMENT INC 49 51
HENNEN EQUIPMENT INC 49 51
HENNEPIN COUNTY
HENCOU HENNEPIN COUNTY
Ck 144196 01 28 10
InY 01251O
Line Item Date
01 25 10
Iny 012510 Total
Line Item Description
Dec 2009 Oyersettlement of Chan taxes
Line Item Account
101 1130 4300 1 166 05
1 166 05
Ck 144196 Total 1 166 05
HENCOU HENNEPIN COUNTY 1 166 05
HENNEPIN COUNTY 1 166 05
HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE
HENTEC HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE
Ck 144198 01 28 10
Iny 193893
Line Item Date
01 25 1 0
Inv 193893 Total
Line Item Description
Fire Dept classes
Line Item Account
101 1220 4370 5 241 68
5 241 68
Page 17
283
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danielle
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
Ck 144198 Total
Amount
5 241 68
HENTEC HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE 5 241 68
HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE 5 241 68
Horizon Talent Agency
Hortal Horizon Talent Agency
Ck 144199 01 28 10
Iny 012510
Line Item Date
01 25 10
InY 01251O Total
Line Item Description
Deposit for 4th of July Entertainment
Line Item Account
101 1613 4300 500 00
500 00
Ck 144199 Total 500 00
Hortal Horizon Talent Agency 500 00
Horizon Talent Agency 500 00
Integra Telecom
integra Integra Telecom
Ck 144119 01 21 10
Iny 120283634
Line Item Date Line Item Description
12 30 09 F eb 2010 Phone System Maint
Iny 120283634 Total
Line Item Account
101 1160 4300 735 31
735 31
Ck 144119 Total 735 31
integra Integra Telecom 735 31
Integra Telecom 735 31
Integrated Loss Control Inc
IntLoss Integrated Loss Control Inc
Ck 144200 01 28 10
Iny 8250
Line Item Date
02 01 10
Iny 8250 Total
Line Item Description
Health Safety Services for Feb 2010
Line Item Account
700 0000 4300 741 00
741 00
Iny 8270
Line Item Date
01 21 10
Iny 8270 Total
Line Item Description
E Safety Program Manual Module
Line Item Account
700 0000 4509 580 00
580 00
Ck 144200 Total 1 321 00
IntLoss Integrated Loss Control Inc 1 321 00
Integrated Loss Control Inc 1 321 00
Page 18
284
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danieIle
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
Amount
KAPAUN MARILYN PAT
KAPAMARI KAPAUN MARILYN PAT
Ck 144091 01 21 10
Inv 111609
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 16 09 Refund Owatonna Discover It s Faces Pla
Inv 111609 Total
Line Item Account
101 1560 3637 48 00
48 00
Ck 144091 Total 48 00
KAPAMARI KAPAUN MARILYN PAT 48 00
KAPAUN MARILYN PAT 48 00
KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE
KATFUE KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE
Ck 144120 01 21 10
Inv 279474
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 14 10 Oil
Inv 279474 Total
Line Item Account
101 1370 4170 3 291 06
3 291 06
Ck 144120 Total 3 291 06
KATFUE KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 3 291 06
KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 3 291 06
KENNEDY GRAVEN CHARTERED
KENGRA KENNEDY GRAVEN CHARTERED
Ck 144201 01 28 10
Inv 93822
Line Item Date
01 21 10
Inv 93822 Total
Line Item Description
Dinner Theater Redevelopment
Line Item Account
462 0000 4300 88 00
88 00
Ck 144201 Total 88 00
KENGRA KENNEDY GRAVEN CHARTERED 88 00
KENNEDY GRAVEN CHARTERED 88 00
Kidd Plumbing Ine
kidplu Kidd Plumbing Ine
Ck 144092 01 21 10
Inv 6603
Line Item Date
12 30 09
Inv 6603 Total
Line Item Description
Clean trench drain line floor drain
Line Item Account
101 1220 4300 242 50
242 50
Ck 144092 Total 242 50
kidplu Kidd Plumbing Ine 242 50
Kidd Plumbing Ine 242 50
Page 19
285
CITY OFCHANHAS
User danielle
KILLMER ELECTRIC CO INC
KILELE KILLMER ELECTRIC CO INC
Ck 144093 01 21 10
Iny 69563
Line Item Date Line Item Description
12 31 09 Powers 5
Iny 69563 Total
Iny 69564
Line Item Date
12 31 09
Iny 69564 Total
Iny 69565
Line Item Date
12 31 09
Iny 69565 Total
Iny 69566
Line Item Date
12 31 09
Iny 69566 Total
Ck 144093 Total
KlLELE
Line Item Description
Market 5 SW Light
Line Item Description
78th 101 NE NW Lights
Line Item Description
Dakota Hwy 5 SW Light
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
Amount
Line Item Account
101 1350 4565 645 36
645 36
Line Item Account
101 1350 4565 181 74
181 74
Line Item Account
101 1350 4565 380 37
380 37
Line Item Account
101 1350 4565 181 74
181 74
1 389 21
1 389 21
1 389 21 KILLMER ELECTRIC CO INC
KILLMER ELECTRIC CO INC
KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC
KIMHOR KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC
Ck 144153 01 28 10
InY 4043741
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 30 09 Lakota Ln Rain Garden
InY 4043741 Total
Ck 144153 Total
KIMHOR
Line Item Account
720 0000 4702 6 149 34
6 149 34
6 149 34
KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC
KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 6 149 34
KIND DEBRA
KINDDEBR KIND DEBRA
Ck 144202 01 28 10
InY 012510
Line Item Date
01 25 10
Iny 012510 Total
Ck 144202 Total
KINDDEBR
KIND DEBRA
Line Item Description
Spring 2010 Chan Connection
KIND DEBRA
6 149 34
Line Item Account
101 1120 4300 467 50
467 50
467 50
467 50
467 50
Page 20
286
Lano Equipment
LANEQl Lano Equipment
Ck 144121 0l 21 lO
Iny 206542
Line Item Date
OI II IO
Iny 206542 Total
LECY CONSTRUCTION
LECCON LECY CONSTRUCTION
Ck 144122 0I 2l 10
InY 012010
Line Item Date
0I 20 10
InY 012010 Total
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danielle
Iny 206678
Line Item Date
0I 13 10
Iny 206678 Total
Iny 206709
Line Item Date
01 13 10
Iny 206709 Total
Ck 144121 Total
LANEQl
Lano Equipment
Ck 144122 Total
LECCON
LECY CONSTRUCTION
Lewis Matt
LewiMatt Lewis Matt
Ck 144123 01 2l 10
InY 011510
Line Item Date
0l 15 l0
Iny 011510 Total
Ck 144123 Total
Ck 144203
InY 01211O
Line Item Date
0l 2l 10
Iny 012110 Total
Ck 144203 Total
LewiMatt
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 0l 10 08 10
Amount
Line Item Description
Hose Chain Clip Gasket
Line Item Account
101 1550 4120 290 14
290 14
Line Item Description
Coyer
Line Item Account
lOl 1550 4120 119 20
119 20
Line Item Description
Gasket Screw
Line Item Account
101 1550 4120 13 06
13 06
422 40
Lano Equipment 422 40
422 40
Line Item Description
Erosion Escrow 2181 Crestview Dr
Line Item Account
815 8202 2024 750 00
750 00
750 00
LECY CONSTRUCTION 750 00
750 00
Line Item Description
Textbooks for HTC Fire Classes Reimb
Line Item Account
101 1220 4370 211 65
211 65
211 65
o l 28 1O
Line Item Description
Reimburse fire course books
Line Item Account
101 1220 4370 178 75
178 75
178 75
Lewis Matt 390 40
Page 21
287
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danielle
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
Lewis Matt
Amount
390 40
LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC
LITFAL LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC
Ck 144154 01 28 10
Inv 435730
Line Item Date
01 11 10
Inv 435730 Total
Line Item Description
Rear lift cylinder tdl a series
Line Item Account
101 1320 4140 469 81
469 81
Ck 144154 Total 469 81
LITF AL LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC 469 81
LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC 469 81
LYMAN LUMBER
LYMLUM LYMAN LUMBER
Ck 144124 01 21 10
Inv 326845
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 06 10 6 x6 x8 lfhreated Pari
Inv 326845 Total
Line Item Account
101 1320 4140 160 31
160 31
Ck 144124 Total 160 31
LYMLUM LYMAN LUMBER 160 31
LYMAN LUMBER 160 31
MACTA
MACTA MACTA
Ck 144204 0l 28 l0
Inv 012710
Line Item Date
01 27 l0
Inv 01271O Total
Line Item Description
02 25 l 0 L Hokkanen Registration
Line Item Account
101 1120 4370 25 00
25 00
Ck 144204 Total 25 00
MACTA MACTA 25 00
MACTA 25 00
METRO A THLETlC SUPPLY
METATH METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY
Ck 144205 01 28 10
Inv 120906
Line Item Date
01 15 10
Inv 120906 Total
Line Item Description
Spalding Mens ZK Pro 1000 Basketballs
Line Item Account
101 1530 4130 78 98
78 98
Ck 144205 Total 78 98
METATH METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 78 98
METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 78 98
Page 22
288
CITY OP CHANHAS
User danielle
Metro Blooms
MetBlo Metro Blooms
Ck 144206 01 28 10
Inv 01221O
Line Item Date
01 22 10
Inv 012210 Total
Line Item Description
2010 Raingarden Workshops
Ck 144206 Total
MetBlo Metro Blooms
Metro Blooms
MINNESOTA LIFE
MNLIFE MINNESOTA LIFE
Ck 144210 01 28 10
Inv 01152010
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 15 10 Peb 2010 Charges
01 15 10 Peb 2010 Charges
01 15 10 Peb 2010 Charges
01 15 10 Peb 2010 Charges
01 15 10 Peb 2010 Charges
01 15 10 Peb 2010 Charges
01 15 10 Peb 2010 Charges
01 15 10 Peb 2010 Charges
01 15 10 Peb 2010 Charges
01 15 10 Peb 2010 Charges
01 15 10 Peb 2010 Charges
01 15 10 Peb 2010 Charges COBRA
01 15 10 Peb 2010 Charges
01 15 10 Peb 2010 Charges
01 15 10 Peb 2010 Charges
01 15 10 Peb 2010 Charges
01 15 10 Feb 2010 Charges
01 15 10 Feb 2010 Charges
01 15 10 Feb 2010 Charges
01 15 10 Feb 2010 Charges
01 15 10 Feb 2010 Charges
01 15 10 Feb 2010 Charges
01 15 10 Feb 2010 Charges
01 15 1 0 Feb 2010 Charges
01 15 10 Feb 2010 Charges
01 15 10 Feb 2010 Charges
01 15 10 Feb 2010 Charges
01 15 10 Feb 2010 Charges
Inv 01152010 Total
Ck 144210 Total
MNLIFE MINNESOTA LIFE
MINNESOTA LIFE
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
Amount
Line Item Account
720 0000 4130 1 000 00
1 000 00
1 000 00
1 000 00
1 000 00
Line Item Account
210 0000 2011
101 1430 4040
720 7201 4040
720 7202 4040
101 1700 4040
101 1170 4040
101 1530 4040
101 1210 4040
210 0000 4040
101 1600 4040
101 1520 4040
101 0000 2011
720 0000 4040
101 1220 4040
10 1 1160 4040
101 1130 4040
101 13 70 4040
701 0000 2011
700 0000 2011
701 0000 4040
101 1420 4040
101 1120 4040
700 0000 4040
10 1 131 0 4040
101 1250 4040
101 1550 4040
10 1 1320 4040
101 0000 2011
0 33
2 84
3 52
3 52
3 58
8 16
8 64
10 08
11 32
14 34
16 00
18 88
20 32
21 56
21 92
28 38
29 78
29 80
29 81
42 84
49 16
50 44
51 48
60 28
71 52
72 12
73 72
391 55
1 145 89
1 145 89
1 145 89
1 145 89
Page 23
289
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danielle
Minnesota UC Fund
mnucfu Minnesota UC Fund
Ck 144094 01 21 10
Inv Ol081O
Line Item Date
01 08 1 0
01 08 1 0
Inv 010810 Total
Ck 144094 Total
mnucfu
Minnesota UC Fund
Line Item Description
4th Quarter 2009
4th Quarter 2009
Minnesota UC Fund
Minnetonka Plumbing Inc
MinnPlum Minnetonka Plumbing Inc
Ck 144155 01 28 10
Inv 123109
Line Item Date
12 31 09
Inv 123109 Total
Ck 144155 Total
MinnPlum
Minnetonka Plumbing Inc
Line Item Description
Chan Public Works Plumbing
Minnetonka Plumbing Inc
MINV ALCO INe
MINV AL MINV ALCO INC
Ck 144207 01 28 10
Inv 736055
Line Item Date
01 18 10
Inv 736055 Total
Ck 144207 Total
MINV AL
MINVALCO INe
Line Item Description
Solenoid Valve Black Pipe
MINVALCO INe
MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CTR
MNCHIL MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CTR
Ck 144208 01 28 10
Inv
Line Item Date
01 26 10
01 26 1 0
Inv Total
Ck 144208 Total
MNCHIL
Line Item Description
PR Batch 429 1 2010 Garnishment
PR Batch 429 1 2010 Garnishment
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
Amount
Line Item Account
101 1530 4060
10 1 1180 4060
29 86
105 49
75 63
75 63
75 63
75 63
Line Item Account
421 0000 4751 75 277 68
75 277 68
75 277 68
75 277 68
75 277 68
Line Item Account
10 1 1170 4530 144 37
144 37
144 37
144 37
144 37
Line Item Account
701 0000 2006
700 0000 2006
174 57
183 52
358 09
358 09
MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CTR
MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CTR
358 09
358 09
Page 24
290
MN DEPT OF HEALTH
MNHEAL MN DEPT OF HEALTH Account 700 0000 4509
Ck 144209 01 28 10
InY 012610
Line Item Date
01 26 10
InY 01261O Total
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP
mvec MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP
Ck 144211 01 28 10
InY 012110
Line Item Date
01 21 10
01 21 10
01 21 10
Iny 012110 Total
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danielle
Ck 144209 Total
MNHEAL
MN DEPT OF HEALTH
Ck 144211 Total
mvec
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
Amount
Line Item Description
Water Operator School Tim Monnens
Line Item Account
700 0000 4370 175 00
175 00
175 00
MN DEPT OF HEALTH 175 00
175 00
Line Item Description
Ian 2010 Charges
Ian 2010 Charges
Ian 2010 Charges
Line Item Account
101 1600 4320
700 0000 4320
101 1350 4320
9 41
134 96
588 42
732 79
732 79
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 732 79
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 732 79
Modern Garages Interiors
Mod Gar Modern Garages Interiors
Ck 144156 01 28 10
Iny 460
Line Item Date
12 22 09
Iny 460 Total
Ck 144156 Total
ModGar
Modern Garages Interiors
Line Item Description
Provide Install floor coating @ new PW
Line Item Account
421 0000 4120 1 211 25
1 211 25
1 211 25
Modern Garages Interiors 1 211 25
1 211 25
Molin Concrete Products Co In
MolCon Molin Concrete Products Co In
Ck 144157 01 28 10
InY 123109
Line Item Date Line Item Description
12 31 09 Chan Public Works Precast Plank
Iny 123109 Total
Ck 144157 Total
Mol Con
Line Item Account
421 0000 4751 1 045 00
1 045 00
1 045 00
Molin Concrete Products Co In 1 045 00
Molin Concrete Products Co In 1 045 00
Page 25
291
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danielle
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
Amount
MOORE MEDICAL
MOOMED MOORE MEDICAL
Ck 144125 01 21 10
InY 81207169EI
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 14 10 Misc first aid supplies
Iny 81207169EI Total
Line Item Account
101 1220 4130 145 19
145 19
Ck 144125 Total 145 19
MOOMED MOORE MEDICAL 145 19
MOORE MEDICAL 145 19
Multiple Concepts Interior
MulCon Multiple Concepts Interior
Ck 144158 01 28 10
Iny 123109
Line Item Date
12 31 09
Iny 123109 Total
Line Item Description
Chan Public Works CarpetlResilient
Line Item Account
421 0000 4751 257 45
257 45
Ck 144158 Total 257 45
MulCon Multiple Concepts Interior 257 45
Multiple Concepts Interior 257 45
MX Logic
MXLog MX Logic
Ck 144126 01 21 10
Iny INV347579
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 01 10 Ian 2010 External SPAM Anti Virus Srvc
Iny INV347579 Total
Line Item Account
101 1160 4300 97 00
97 00
Ck 144126 Total 97 00
MXLog MX Logic 97 00
MX Logic 97 00
Nahan Shelley
NahaShel Nahan Shelley
Ck 144212 01 28 10
InY 011610
Line Item Date
01 16 10
Iny 011610 Total
Line Item Description
Babysitting Training Instructor 01 16 1 0
Line Item Account
101 1538 4300 125 00
125 00
Ck 144212 Total 125 00
NahaShel Nahan Shelley 125 00
Nahan Shelley 125 00
Page 26
292
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danielle
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
Amount
NAPA AUTO TRUCK PARTS
NAPA NAPA AUTO TRUCK PARTS
Ck 144213 01 28 10
InY 445161
Line Item Date
01 18 10
InY 445161 Total
Line Item Description
Wipers Filters
Line Item Account
101 1550 4120 142 79
142 79
Iny 445162
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 18 10 Fuel Fil
Iny 445162 Total
Line Item Account
101 1320 4120 11 78
11 78
Ck 144213 Total 154 57
NAPA NAPA AUTO TRUCK PARTS 154 57
NAPA AUTO TRUCK PARTS 154 57
NEXTEL
NEXTEL NEXTEL
Ck 144214 01 28 10
InY 603663316 098
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 18 10 Jan 2010 Charges
01 18 10 Jan 2010 Charges
01 18 10 Jan 2010 Charges
01 18 10 Jan 2010 Charges
01 18 10 Jan 2010 Charges
01 18 1 0 Jan 2010 Charges
01 18 10 Jan 2010 Charges
01 18 10 Jan 2010 Charges
01 18 10 Jan 2010 Charges
01 18 10 Jan 2010 Charges
01 18 10 Jan2010Charges
01 18 10 Jan 20 1 O Charges
01 18 10 Jan 2010 Charges
01 18 10 Jan 2010 Charges
01 18 10 Jan2010Charges
01 18 10 Jan 2010 Charges
01 18 10 Jan 2010 Charges
01 18 10 Jan 2010 Charges
01 18 10 Jan 2010 Charges
01 18 10 Jan 2010 Charges
01 18 10 Jan 2010 Charges
01 18 10 Jan 2010 Charges
01 18 10 Jan 2010 Charges
Iny 603663316 098 Total
Line Item Account
720 0000 2006
700 0000 2006
701 0000 2006
10 1 0000 2006
101 0000 2006
101 0000 2006
101 1170 4310
101 1530 4310
720 0000 4310
101 1260 4310
101 1600 4310
101 1520 4310
101 1130 4310
101 1370 4310
101 1550 4310
10 1 1310 4310
701 0000 4310
700 0000 4310
101 1320 4310
101 1250 4310
101 1160 4310
101 1120 4310
101 1220 4310
1 25
2 50
2 50
3 75
10 00
13 84
18 01
18 01
36 02
42 21
108 40
124 97
147 55
168 99
170 44
208 76
249 88
249 89
261 20
280 49
307 60
371 52
472 73
3 270 51
Ck 144214 Total 3 270 51
NEXTEL NEXTEL 3 270 51
NEXTEL 3 270 51
Page 27
293
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danielle
Oertel Architects
OerArc Oertel Architects
Ck 144095 01 21 10
Iny 14
Line Item Date
12 31 09
Iny 14 Total
Ck 144095 Total
OerArc
Oertel Architects
Line Item Description
Public Works Proj Prof Consulting Srvc
Oertel Architects
OLSON CABINETS WOODWORKING
OLSCAB OLSON CABINETS WOODWORKING
Ck 144159 01 28 10
Iny 121209
Line Item Date
12 12 09
Iny 121209 Total
Ck 144159 Total
OLSCAB
Line Item Description
Library repair labor on drawer box
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
Amount
Line Item Account
421 0000 4300 10 565 50
10 565 50
10 565 50
10 565 50
10 565 50
Line Item Account
101 1190 4300 I 10 00
I 10 00
110 00
OLSON CABINETS WOODWORKING
OLSON CABINETS WOODWORKING
11 0 00
P J Promotions
PJPro P J Promotions
Ck 144216 01 28 10
Iny 1649
Line Item Date
01 20 10
01 20 10
01 20 1 0
Iny 1649 Total
Ck 144216 Total
P JPro
P J Promotions
Line Item Description
Chan Rec Center Y outh T Shirts
Chan Rec Center Youth T Shirts
Chan Rec Center Youth T Shirts
P J Promotions
PALMER WEST CONSTRUCTION
PALWES PALMER WEST CONSTRUCTION
Ck 144215 01 28 10
InY 6175
Line Item Date
01 18 10
InY 6175 Total
Ck 144215 Total
PALWES
Line Item Description
Fire Dept labor
11 0 00
Line Item Account
101 1804 4240
101 1803 4240
101 1802 4240
306 00
306 00
306 00
918 00
918 00
918 00
918 00
Line Item Account
101 1220 4510 519 00
519 00
519 00
PALMER WEST CONSTRUCTION
PALMER WEST CONSTRUCTION
519 00
519 00
Page 28
294
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danielle
PATRICK CO
PATCO PATRICK CO
Ck 144160 01 28 10
Iny 798980
Line Item Date
12 02 09
Iny 798980 Total
Ck 144160 Total
PATCO
PATRICK CO
Pluth Brad
PlutBrad Pluth Brad
Ck 144217 01 28 10
Iny 012510
Line Item Date
01 25 1 0
Iny 012510 Total
Ck 144217 Total
PlutBrad
Pluth Brad
POSTMASTER
POST POSTMASTER
Ck 144218 01 28 10
InY 012610
Line Item Date
01 26 10
01 26 10
InY 012610 Total
Ck 144218 Total
POST
POSTMASTER
Line Item Description
Dog Pet License Tags
PATRICK CO
Line Item Description
K Hanlon Personal Training
Pluth Brad
Line Item Description
Permit 14 VB Mailing
Permit 14 VB Mailing
POSTMASTER
POWER SYSTEMS
POWCHA POWER SYSTEMS
Ck 144127 01 21 10
Iny 1 65839 0
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 05 10 Adaptors
Iny 1 65839 0 Total
Ck 144127 Total
POWCHA
POWER SYSTEMS
POWER SYSTEMS
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
Amount
Line Item Account
101 1170 4110 517 40
517 40
517 40
517 40
517 40
Line Item Account
101 1533 4300 97 50
97 50
97 50
97 50
97 50
Line Item Account
700 0000 4330
701 0000 4330
344 24
344 24
688 48
688 48
688 48
688 48
Line Item Account
10 1 1220 4140 33 84
33 84
33 84
33 84
33 84
Page 29
295
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danieIle
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
Amount
Prairie s Edge Inc
PraEdg Prairie s Edge Inc
Ck 144161 01 28 10
InY 123109
Line Item Date
12 31 09
Iny 123109 Total
Line Item Description
Chao Public Works Window Treatment
Line Item Account
421 0000 4751 1 705 25
1 705 25
Ck 144161 Total 1 705 25
PraEdg Prairie s Edge Inc 1 705 25
Prairie s Edge Inc 1 705 25
Preferred One Insurance Company
PreOne PreferredOne Insurance Company
Ck 144128 01 21 10
Iny 100151895
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 17 10 Feb 2010 Premium
01 17 10 Feb 2010 Premium COBRA
01 17 10 Feb 2010 Premium
01 17 10 Feb 2010 Premium
01 17 10 Feb 2010 Premium
01 17 10 Feb 2010 Premium
Iny 100151895 Total
Line Item Account
210 0000 2012
101 0000 2012
720 0000 2012
701 0000 2012
700 0000 2012
10 1 0000 20 12
321 27
963 81
1 646 21
3 103 51
3 906 44
27 799 41
37 740 65
Ck 144128 Total 37 740 65
PreOne Preferred One Insurance Company 37 740 65
Preferred One Insurance Company 37 740 65
PUMP AND METER SERVICES INC
PUMMET PUMP AND METER SERVICES INC
Ck 144162 01 28 10
Iny 123109
Line Item Date
12 31 09
Iny 123109 Total
Line Item Description
Chan Public Works Vehicle Maint Equip
Line Item Account
421 0000 4751 11 788 30
11 788 30
Ck 144162 Total 11 788 30
PUMMET PUMP AND METER SERVICES INC 11 788 30
PUMP AND METER SERVICES INC 11 788 30
Quality Control Integration
qualcon Quality Control Integration
Ck 144096 01 21 10
Iny 639
Line Item Date
12 30 09
Iny 639 Total
Line Item Description
Dec 09 Monthly Maint Fee for 09 10 Srvc
Line Item Account
700 0000 4551 1 500 00
1 500 00
Ck 144096 Total 1 500 00
qualcon Quality Control Integration 1 500 00
Page 30
296
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danielle
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
Quality Control Integration
Amount
1 500 00
Quality Flow Systems Ine
QUAFLO Quality Flow Systems Ine
Ck 144219 01 28 10
Iny 21951
Line Item Date
01 13 10
Iny 21951 Total
RJM CONSTRUCTION
RJMCON RJM CONSTRUCTION
Ck 144163 01 28 10
Iny 123109
Line Item Date
12 31 09
Iny 123109 Total
ROTARY CLUB OF CHANHASSEN
ROTCLU ROTARY CLUB OF CHANHASSEN
Ck 144220 01 28 10
Iny 01181O
Line Item Date
01 18 10
Iny 011810 Total
Ck 144219 Total
QUAFLO
Quality Flow Systems Ine
Ck 144163 Total
RJMCON
RJM CONSTRUCTION
Ck 144220 Total
ROTCLU
Line Item Description
Repair ofE80 251174X pump
Line Item Account
701 0000 4551 1 501 44
1 501 44
1 501 44
Quality Flow Systems Ine 1 501 44
1 501 44
Line Item Description
Chan Public Works General Conditions
Line Item Account
421 0000 4300 69 414 46
69 414 46
69 414 46
RJM CONSTRUCTION 69 414 46
69 414 46
Line Item Description
Int I District 5950 Dues T Hoffman
Line Item Account
101 1520 4360 131 00
131 00
131 00
ROTARY CLUB OF CHANHASSEN 131 00
ROTARY CLUB OF CHANHASSEN 131 00
RTL Construction Inc
RTLCon RTL Construction Inc
Ck 144164 01 28 10
Iny 123109
Line Item Date
12 31 09
Iny 123109 Total
Ck 144164 Total
RTLCon
RTL Construction Inc
Line Item Description
Chan Public Works Gypsum Board Systems
Line Item Account
421 0000 4751 481 65
481 65
481 65
RTL Construction Inc 481 65
481 65
Page 31
297
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danielle
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
Amount
S T OFFICE PRODUCTS
STOFF S T OFFICE PRODUCTS
Ck 144169 01 28 10
Iny 01NS3700
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 25 09 Hayworth product installed by S T
Iny 01NS3700 Total
Line Item Account
421 0000 4120 49 258 61
49 258 61
Ck 144169 Total 49 258 61
STOFF S T OFFICE PRODUCTS 49 258 61
S T OFFICE PRODUCTS 49 258 61
SABINSKE DEAN
SABIDEAN SABINSKE DEAN
Ck 144097 01 21 10
Iny 121309
Line Item Date Line Item Description
12 13 09 Work Jeans
Iny 121309 Total
Line Item Account
101 1320 4240 149 75
149 75
Ck 144097 Total 149 75
SABIDEAN SABINSKE DEAN 149 75
SABINSKE DEAN 149 75
Seaya DiYing Ine
SeaDiy Seaya DiYing Ine
Ck 144129 01 21 10
Iny 307839
Line Item Date
01 07 10
Iny 307839 Total
Line Item Description
Seaquest BCD service Alt air source repa
Line Item Account
101 1220 4530 66 31
66 31
Ck 144129 Total 66 31
SeaDiy Seaya DiYing Ine 66 31
Seaya Diving Ine 66 31
SENTRY SYSTEMS INC
SENSYS SENTRY SYSTEMS INC
Ck 144130 01 21 10
Iny 613033
Line Item Date
01 14 10
InY 613033 Total
Line Item Description
Library Commercial MonitoringlTest Insp
Line Item Account
101 1190 4300 53 76
53 76
Iny 613056
Line Item Date
01 14 10
01 14 10
Iny 613056 Total
Line Item Description
City Hall Water Treatment Plant Test Ins
City HaIl Water Treatment Plant Test lns
Line Item Account
101 1170 4300
700 7019 4300
215 31
835 81
1 051 12
Ck 144130 Total 1 104 88
Page 32
298
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danielle
Ck 144221
Iny 614148
Line Item Date
01 15 10
InY 614148 Total
InY 614152
Line Item Date
01 15 10
InY 614152 Total
Ck 144221 Total
SENSYS
SENTRY SYSTEMS INC
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
Amount
01 28 1 0
Line Item Description
Chan PW Initial Set Up of Fire Panel
Line Item Account
101 1370 4310 427 50
427 50
Line Item Description
Chan PW Monitoring
Line Item Account
101 1370 4320 128 14
128 14
555 64
SENTRY SYSTEMS INC 1 660 52
1 660 52
SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE
SHOTRU SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE
Ck 144098 01 21 10
Iny 95933
Line Item Date
12 03 09
Iny 95933 Total
InY 96164
Line Item Date
12 15 09
InY 96164 Total
Iny 96282
Line Item Date
12 23 09
Iny 96282 Total
InY 96310
Line Item Date
12 26 09
Iny 96310 Total
Iny 96385
Line Item Date
12 31 09
Iny 96385 Total
Ck 144098 Total
SHOTRU
Line Item Description
Lime A Way InlOut Broom
Line Item Account
101 1170 4150 35 78
35 78
Line Item Account
101 1170 4260 26 71
26 71
Line Item Account
101 1220 4520 54 97
54 97
Line Item Account
101 1170 4530 16 78
16 78
Line Item Account
101 1170 4530 64 13
64 13
198 37
198 37
198 37
Line Item Description
Ceramic Heater
Line Item Description
Cleaning Supplies
Line Item Description
Shear Bolt Kit Washers Bulb Primer
Line Item Description
Blade Rotor Scraper
SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE
SHOREWOODTRUEVALUE
SIGNSOURCE
SIGNSO SIGNSOURCE
Ck 144099 01 21 10
Iny 24427
Line Item Date
12 31 09
Iny 24427 Total
Line Item Description
Roundhouse Ice Rink Sign Sign Patches
Line Item Account
101 1617 4300 189 70
189 70
Page 33
299
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danielle
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
Ck 144099 Total
Amount
189 70
Ck 144165
Iny 24545
Line Item Date
01 13 10
Iny 24545 Total
01 28 1 0
Line Item Description
Feb Fest Signs
Line Item Account
101 1550 4560 37 41
37 41
Ck 144165 Total 37 41
SIGNSO SIGNSOURCE 227 11
SIGN SOURCE 227 11
SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL
SOFHOU SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL
Ck 144166 01 28 10
Iny 82AD4
Line Item Date
12 30 09
Iny 82AD4 Total
Line Item Description
Adobe Dreamweayer CS4 Media
Line Item Account
400 4117 4703 791 95
791 95
Ck 144166 Total 791 95
SOFHOU SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 791 95
SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 791 95
Southwest Metro Chamber of Com
Southwes Southwest Metro Chamber of Com
Ck 144131 01 21 10
InY 011910
Line Item Date
01 19 10
Iny 011910 Total
Line Item Description
01 27 10 Luncheon J Ruegemer
Line Item Account
101 1600 4370 20 00
20 00
Inv 1903
Line Item Date
01 01 10
Iny 1903 Total
Line Item Description
2010 Contract for Services Tech Fee
Line Item Account
101 1110 4360 375 00
375 00
Ck 144131 Total 395 00
Southwes Southwest Metro Chamber of Com 395 00
Southwest Metro Chamber of Com 395 00
SPRINT PCS
SPRPCS SPRINT PCS
Ck 144132 01 21 10
InY 240298813 026
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 18 10 Jan 2010 Charges
01 18 10 Jan2010Charges
01 18 1 0 Jan 2010 Charges
InY 240298813 026 Total
Line Item Account
700 0000 4310
701 0000 4310
10 1 1220 4310
39 99
39 99
39 99
119 97
Page 34
300
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danielle
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
Ck 144132 Total
Amount
119 97
Ck 144222 01 28 10
Iny 189129626 066
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 18 10 Jan 2010 Charges
01 18 10 Jan 2010 Charges
Iny 189129626 066 Total
Line Item Account
700 0000 4310
701 0000 4310
15 00
111 43
126 43
Ck 144222 Total 126 43
SPRPCS SPRINT PCS 246 40
SPRINT PCS 246 40
SPS Companies St Louis Park
SPSSLP SPS Companies St Louis Park
Ck 144100 01 21 10
Iny S2123804 001
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 10 09 Valve Compression Union Flex Copper
Iny S2123804 001 Total
Line Item Account
101 1170 4530 27 84
27 84
Ck 144100 Total 27 84
Ck 144223 01 28 10
Iny S2151750 00 I
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 15 10 Drill bit
Iny S2151750 001 Total
Line Item Account
101 1170 4260 14 71
14 71
Ck 144223 Total 14 71
SPSSLP SPS Companies St Louis Park 42 55
SPS Companies St Louis Park 42 55
SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC
SRFCON SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC
Ck 144167 01 28 10
InY 6914 3
Line Item Date
12 31 09
InY 6914 3 Total
Line Item Description
Audubon Rd Professional Services
Line Item Account
412 0000 4752 2 988 68
2 988 68
Ck 144167 Total 2 988 68
SRFCON SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 2 988 68
SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 2 988 68
Staples Contract Commercial
StaCon Staples Contract Commercial
Ck 144224 01 28 10
Iny 99928440
Line Item Date
01 12 10
Line Item Description
Lamnt Pouch Mouse pad
Line Item Account
101 1170 4110 51 88
Page 35
301
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danielle
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
Inv 99928440 Totw
Amount
51 88
Inv 99955326
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 13 10 Binding
Inv 99955326 Total
Line Item Account
101 1170 4110 210 73
210 73
Ck 144224 Total 262 61
StaCon Staples Contract Commercial 262 61
Staples Contract Commercial 262 61
Steinbrecher Painting Inc
StePai Steinbrecher Painting Inc
Ck 144168 01 28 10
Inv 123109
Line Item Date
12 31 09
Inv 123109 Total
Line Item Description
Chan Public Works Painting
Line Item Account
421 0000 4751 19 559 55
19 559 55
Ck 144168 Total 19 559 55
StePai S einbrecher Painting Inc 19 559 55
Steinbrecher Painting Inc 19 559 55
STEINKRAUS PLUMBING INC
STEPLU STEINKRAUS PLUMBING INC
Ck 144101 01 21 10
Inv 121293N
Line Item Date Line Item Description
12 31 09 3881 Maple Shores Dr install kitchen fau
Inv 121293N Total
Line Item Account
700 0000 4552 507 00
507 00
Ck 144101 Total 507 00
STEPLU STEINKRAUS PLUMBING INC 507 00
STEINKRAUS PLUMBING INC 507 00
STEVE SIEGLE REPAIR
STESIE STEVE SIEGLE REPAIR
Ck 144225 01 28 10
Inv 01061O
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 06 1 0 Sheared Bent 4 sheets for floor heat
Inv 010610 Total
Line Item Account
421 0000 4300 180 00
180 00
Ck 144225 Total 180 00
STESIE STEVE SIEGLE REPAIR 180 00
STEVE SIEGLE REPAIR 180 00
Page 36
302
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danielle
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
Amount
STREICHER S
STREIC STREICHER S
Ck 144133 01 21 10
Iny 1702542
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 13 10 Boots
Iny 1702542 Total
Line Item Account
101 1220 4240 89 99
89 99
Ck 144133 Total 89 99
Ck 144226 01 28 10
Iny 1704426
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 19 10 Polo shirts
Iny 1704426 Total
Line Item Account
101 1260 4240 120 78
120 78
Ck 144226 Total 120 78
STREIC STREICHER S 210 77
STREICHER S 210 77
SULLIVAN S UTILITY SERVo INC
SULUTI SULLIVAN S UTILITY SERVo INC
Ck 144227 01 28 10
Iny 60317
Line Item Date
01 20 10
Iny 60317 Total
Line Item Description
Vac Clean Lift Station @ Lotus Minnewas
Line Item Account
701 0000 4551 221 36
221 36
Ck 144227 Total 221 36
SULUTI SULLIVAN S UTILITY SERVo INC 221 36
SULLIVAN S UTILITY SERVo INC 221 36
THEIS CONSTRUCTION CO
THECON THEIS CONSTRUCTION CO
Ck 144102 01 21 10
InY 09 158
Line Item Date
12 30 09
InY 09 158 Total
Line Item Description
Tear out curbs install 2 handicap access
Line Item Account
410 0000 470 I 2 482 00
2 482 00
InY 09 159
Line Item Date
12 30 09
InY 09 159 Total
Line Item Description
Sidewalk w thicken edge
Line Item Account
410 0000 4701 7 036 00
7 036 00
InY 09 160
Line Item Date
12 30 09
Iny 09 160 Total
Line Item Description
Concrete tear out replace optional
Line Item Account
400 0000 4701 19 371 00
19 371 00
Iny 09 161
Line Item Date
12 30 09
InY 09 161 Total
Line Item Description
Stoop @ Warming House South Side
Line Item Account
400 0000 4701 2 505 00
2 505 00
Page 37
303
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danielle
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 1 0 08 10
Amount
Inv 09162
Line Item Date Line Item Description
12 30109 8579 Chan Hills Dr Concrete Slab Picnic
Inv 09162 Total
Ck 144102 Total
THECON
Line Item Account
410 0000 4701 1 664 00
1 664 00
33 058 00
THEIS CONSTRUCTION CO 33 058 00
THEIS CONSTRUCTION CO 33 058 00
TOLL GAS WELDING SUPPLY
TOLGAS TOLL GAS WELDING SUPPLY
Ck 144228 01 28 10
Inv 293196
Line Item Date
01 11 10
Inv 293196 Total
Inv 293197
Line Item Date
01 11 10
Inv 293197 Total
Ck 144228 Total
TOLGAS
Line Item Description
A PEAing Wheel
Line Item Account
101 1320 4150 43 09
43 09
Line Item Description
Safety Glasses Nemesis Blea
Line Item Account
101 1550 4120 194 91
194 91
238 00
TOLL GAS WELDING SUPPLY 238 00
TOLL GAS WELDING SUPPLY 238 00
USA BLUE BOOK
USABLU USA BLUE BOOK
Ck 144134 01 21 10
Inv 966664
Line Item Date
01 08 1 0
Inv 966664 Total
VICTORIA REPAIR MFG
VICREP VICTORIA REPAIR MFG
Ck 144230 01 28 10
Inv 3517
Line Item Date
01 20 1 0
Ck 144134 Total
Ck 144229
Inv 969217
Line Item Date
01 13 10
Inv 969217 Total
Ck 144229 Total
USABLU
USA BLUE BOOK
Line Item Description
Male x Male Hex
Line Item Account
700 0000 4150 129 43
129 43
129 43
01 28 10
Line Item Description
Float Switch 60 SPDT Suspended
Line Item Account
701 0000 4551 332 05
332 05
332 05
USA BLUE BOOK 461 48
461 48
Line Item Description
6 x 10 work bench
Line Item Account
701 0000 4150 1 521 90
Page 38
304
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danielle
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
Inv 3517 Total
Amouot
1 521 90
Ck 144230 Total 1 521 90
VICREP VICTORIA REPAIR MFG 1 521 90
VICTORIA REPAIR MFG 1 521 90
WACONIA DODGE
WACDOD WACONIA DODGE
Ck 144231 01 28 10
Iov 18030
Line Item Date
01 21 10
Iov 18030 Total
Line Item Description
Resistor Wiring
Line Item Account
101 1260 4140 62 39
62 39
Ck 144231 Total 62 39
WACDOD W ACONIA DODGE 62 39
W ACONIA DODGE 62 39
WASHINGTON COUNTY
W ASCOU WASHINGTON COUNTY
Ck 144232 01 28 10
Inv 65173
Line Item Date Line Item Description
02 15 10 Motorola Cost Allocation
Inv 65173 Total
Line Item Account
101 1260 4531 15 21
15 21
Ck 144232 Total 15 21
W ASCOU WASHINGTON COUNTY 15 21
WASHINGTON COUNTY 15 21
White Thomas W
WhitThom White Thomas W
Ck 144135 01 21 10
Inv 011410
Line Item Date
01 14 10
Inv 01141O Total
Line Item Description
Labor to touch up paint
Line Item Account
101 1190 4510 495 00
495 00
Ck 144135 Total 495 00
WhitThom White Thomas W 495 00
White Thomas W 495 00
WING RICHARD
WINGRICH WING RICHARD
Ck 144136 01 21 10
Inv 01151O
Line Item Date
01 15 10
Inv 011510 Total
Line Item Description
Dry Erase Markers Spare Key GMC
Line Item Account
101 1220 4290 35 25
35 25
Page 39
305
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danielle
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
Ck 144136 Total
Amount
35 25
WINGRICH WING RICHARD 35 25
WING RICHARD 35 25
WSB ASSOCIATES INC
WSB WSB ASSOCIATES INC
Ck 144170 01 28 10
InY l
Line Item Date
01 04 10
Iny 1 Total
Line Item Description
Lotus Lk Channel Stabilization Proj
Line Item Account
720 0000 4300 1 274 00
1 274 00
InY 9
Line Item Date
o 1 08II 0
Iny 9 Total
Line Item Descriotion
Hill Street Drainage
Line Item Account
720 7025 4751 242 00
242 00
Ck 144170 Total 1 516 00
WSB WSB ASSOCIATES INC 1 516 00
WSB ASSOCIATES INC 1 516 00
WW GRAINGER INC
WWGRA WW GRAINGER INC
Ck 144137 01 21 10
InY 9151693364
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 04 10 Pallet Rack Wire Decking
Iny 9151693364 Total
Line Item Account
700 0000 4150 1 088 84
1 088 84
Ck 144137 Total 1 088 84
Ck 144233 01 28IIO
InY 9155892186
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 08 10 inlet marine
Iny 9155892186 Total
Line Item Account
701 0000 4551 64 98
64 98
Iny 9157238602
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 11IIO Door closer hydraulic
InY 9157238602 Total
Line Item Account
701 0000 4150 671 15
671 15
InY 9157238610
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 11 10 Hand dryer plugtrak entrance end fit
InY 9157238610 Total
Line Item Account
700 0000 4510 827 28
827 28
InY 9159579052
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 14 10 Pallet Rack Beam
InY 9159579052 Total
Line Item Account
700 0000 4150 231 45
231 45
Ck 144233 Total 1 794 86
Page 40
306
CITY OF CHANHAS
User danielle
WWGRA WW GRAINGER INC
WW GRAINGER INC
XCEL ENERGY INC
xcel XCEL ENERGY INC
Ck 144138 01 21 10
InY 224769113
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 15 10 Jan 2010 Charges
Iny 224769113 Total
Ck 144138 Total
Ck 144171 01 28 10
Iny 225231171
Line Item Date
01 20 10
Iny 225231171
Line Item Description
Dec 2009 Charges
Total
Ck 144171 Total
Ck 144234 01 28 10
InY 225191235
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 20 10 Jan 2010 Charges
InY 225191235 Total
InY 225220105
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 20 10 Jan 2010 Charges
01 20 10 Jan 2010 Charges
01 20 10 Jan 2010 Charges
01 20 10 Jan 2010 Charges
01 20 10 Jan 2010 Charges
01 20 10 Jan 2010 Charges
01 20 10 Jan 2010 Charges
InY 225220105 Totm
InY 225555785
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 22 10 Jan 2010 Charges
InY 225555785 Totm
InY 225561823
Line Item Date Line Item Description
01 22 10 Jan 2010 Charges
InY 225561823 Total
Ck 144234 Total
xcel XCEL ENERGY INC
XCEL ENERGY INC
Total
Accounts Payable
Check Detail Report Detail
Printed 02 01 10 08 10
Amount
2 883 70
2 883 70
Line Item Account
700 7019 4320 22 34
22 34
22 34
Line Item Account
700 0000 4320 8 788 24
8 788 24
8 788 24
Line Item Account
701 0000 4320 5 241 41
5 241 41
Line Item Account
101 1551 4320
700 0000 4320
701 0000 4320
101 1220 4320
101 1370 4320
101 1170 4320
101 1190 4320
48 10
307 85
307 85
993 31
2 462 80
2 862 17
3 174 70
10 156 78
Line Item Account
101 1600 4320 77 52
77 52
Line Item Account
700 7019 4320 6 498 77
6 498 77
21 974 48
30 785 06
30 785 06
592 421 87
Page 41
307