The URL can be used to link to this page

1h1 Frontier 2nd Addn PlatCITYOF C HASSEN 7700 tdarke: Bodievad PO Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 Administration Phon(~ 952 2271100 Fax 952227 1110 Building Inspections Pt~'sr,e 95222;'1180 Fax~ 952227 1190 Engineering Phon,x: 952 227 1160 Fax 952227 1!70 Finance PPcrk' 952 2271!40 Fax: 962 227! 110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952227 1120 Fax 9522271110 Recreation Octet 2310 CoCter BotJlevard Phone 952227 1400 Fax 952227 1404 Planning a Natural Resources Phone: 952227 113(-) lax: 952227 1110 Public Works 1591 Park Roa,q Pr 9r!e: 952227 1300 Fax 952 2271310 Senior Center Pt(ne 952227 !125 Fax: 952227 11!0 Web Site MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: DATE: Sharmeen A1-Jaff, Senior Planner August 23, 2004 SUB J: Preliminary and Final plat approval to subdivide 2.61 acres into 5 single-family lots - Frontier Second Addition. Planning Case 04-26 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The preliminary plat was approved by the Planning Commission on August 3, 2004. ACTION REQUIRED City Council approval requires a majority of City Council present. PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY The Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 3, 2004, to review the proposed development. The Planning Commission voted to unanimously approve the proposed development. The summary and verbatim minutes are item la in this packet. RECOMMENDATION Staff and the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the motion approving the preliminary and final plat as specified in the staff report dated August 3, 2004. ATTACHMENTS Staff Report Dated August 3, 2004. g:\plan\2004 planning cases\04-26 - frontier second addition\executive summary for preliminary and final plat.doc The 6i1¥ of Chanhassen · A growing cor'~r%nity wit½ clean lakes quality schools a charming do,,x to,,,,,,r' ti',r ,' '~( ',:,,~,,ssr s winding trails and beautiful parks. A great Cace ~o iive work and play CITY OF CHANHASSEN PC DATE: August 3, 2004 CC DATE: August 23, 2004 REVIEW DEADLINE: August 30, 2004 CASE #: Planning Case 04-26 BY: Al-Jaff/Sweidan/Torell/Haak/Sinclair STAFF REPORT Z PROPOSAL: LOCATION: APPLICANT: Preliminary and Final plat approval to subdivide 2.61 acres into 5 single-family lots - Frontier Second Addition. Northeast intersection of Frontier Trail and West 77th Street. Charles R. Stinson 18304 Minnetonka Boulevard Deephaven, MN 55391 (952) 473-9503 PRESENT ZONING: RSF, Single Family Residential District 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Low Density (Net Density 1.2 - 4.0 units per acre) ACREAGE: 2.61 acres DENSITY: 1.9 Units per Acre Gross 1.9 Units per Acre Net SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Subdivision of 2.61 acres into 5 single-family lots. Two of these lots contain single-family homes. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. Staff is recommending approval of the request. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Frontier Second Addition Planning Case No. 04-26 August 3, 2004 Page 2 Since the Planning Commission meeting, the applicant submitted revised plans to address issues raised in the staff report. This has been amended to reflect the revisions. All new information will appear in bold. PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicant is proposing to subdivide 2.61 acres into 5 single-family lots. The property is zoned RSF, Single Family Residential District. The site consists of two lots that are being replatted into five lots. Two of the five lots contain single-family homes. Access to the most easterly existing homes is gained via West 77th Street. The residence located at the northeast intersection of West 77th Street and Frontier Trail gains access off of Frontier Trail. The three proposed lots will gain access via Frontier Trail also. Staff has been working with the applicant for several months. Several development scenarios were examined including the use of a private and a public street along the east portion of the property. Both options resulted in more tree removal and grading than the current request. The requested layout proposes custom grading the lots which will minimize grading and tree removal. The average lot size is 22,710 square feet with a resulting gross density of 1.9 units per acre. The site is located northeast of the intersection of Frontier Trail and West 77th Street. All five lots meet the minimum area, width, and depth requirements of the Zoning Ordinance with the exception ,~f lots 4 and 5. The zoning ordinance requires a minimum lot area of !5,909 square feet. These simply shifting *~ -"~ ..... "" ~; ..... r ~,o e ~ ~.A 5 The site contains a bluff along the Frontier Second Addition Planning Case No. 04-26 August 3, 2004 Page 3 northwest portion of the site. The required setbacks will be maintained from the edge of the bluff. The site has mature trees which the applicant is making an effort to preserve. In summary, staff believes that the proposed subdivision is well designed. Minor revisions will be required. We are recommending that it be approved with conditions outlined in the staff report. PRELIMINARY PLAT The applicant is proposing to subdivide a 2.61 acre site into 5 single-family lots. The gross density of the site is 1.9 units per acre. :r-hree-of-~ All five lots exceed the minimum 15,000 square feet of area. while th~ ~*~'~ * ....... ,~c;,;~, Th; .... ~, .... ;~,, C;~ ~,, o;~,, ~;C,; ........... ~,, lines to the nexh. The average lot size for this development is 22,710 squ~e feet. A bluff occupies the southwest portion of proposed Lot 1 and the northwest portion of Lot 2. The ordinance requires all structures to maintain a 30-foot setback from the top and toe of the bluff. The plans indicate that this setback can be accommodated and no grading is proposed within that area. Staff notes that the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and generally consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. WETLANDS There are no wetlands on this site. GRADING~ DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL The existing site is heavily wooded with tree cover over approximately two acres of area. Because of the heavily wooded nature of the site, the applicant is proposing to custom grade each of the new housepads. Staff agrees that this is the most environmentally sensitive way to develop the site. Detailed grading, drainage, tree removal and erosion control plans will be required for each of the new lots at the time of building permit application for City review and approval. In addition, as-built surveys will be required on each lot prior to occupancy. One area on the property has been identified as bluff (i.e., slope greater than or equal to 30% and a rise in slope of at least 25 feet above the toe). The existing bluff area is between proposed Lots 1 and 2. This area must be preserved. In addition, all structures must maintain a 30-foot setback from the bluff and no grading may occur within the bluff impact zone (i.e., the bluff and land located within 20 feet from the top of a bluff). A conservation easement should be dedicated over the bluff area and the bluff impact zone ................. t~ ............. proposed,~,~,,,,,,~ .................................. v,; .......................... H ............ e a cant should be aware that any retaining walls over 4 feet in height must be designed by a Structural Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. Also, the walls will require building pe~its from the Building Depa~ment. Frontier Second Addition Planning Case No. 04-26 August 3, 2004 Page 4 The plans propose to grade about 5% of the site to reroute and stabilize the existing swale at the northeasterly comer of the parcel. There is a small portion of the proposed grading which extends outside of the site limits. The applicant must be aware that this off-site grading will require a temporary easement from the property owner. The proposed development is required to maintain existing runoff rates. There is an existing drainageway that begins where an 18-inch pipe outlets into a low spot on City property adjacent to the subject site. It appears that there was a small pond on the City property with a weir that is now in disrepair. The high velocities and volumes of runoff coming out of the pipe have caused erosion along the drainageway from the pipe to the northeast comer of the subject property. Due to the lack of adequate stormwater ponding in the area, staff is recommending that the applicant construct ponding e, il4~mq~t~o~ on the neighboring City-owned parcel to the east. The pond must be designed to NURP guidelines and sized/located to maximize water quality treatment while minimizing the amount of tree loss. Easements Drainage and utility easements, a minimum of 20 feet in width, shc,'z!~ ~e are provided over all drainageways and storm water ponds. Erosion Control Erosion control measures and site restoration must be developed in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook (BMPH). Tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. Silt fence must be used around the grading area. All disturbed areas, as a result of construction, must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time Steeper than 3:1 7 days 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area is not actively being worked.) These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as-needed. Frontier Second Addition Planning Case No. 04-26 August 3, 2004 Page 5 Surface Water Management Fees Water Quality Fees Because of the impervious surface associated with this development, the water quality fees for this proposed development are based on single-family residential development rates of $1,028/acre. Based on the proposed developed area of approximately 2.61 acres, the water quality fees associated with this project are $2,683. Water Quantity Fees The SWMP has established a connection charge for the different land uses based on an average city- wide rate for the installation of water quantity systems. This cost includes land acquisition, proposed SWMP culverts, open channels, and storm water ponding areas for runoff storage. Single- family residential developments have a connection charge of $2,545 per developable acre. This results in a water quantity fee of approximately $6,642 for the proposed development. Acthis4me;, The estimated total SWMP fee,,,~,~ '~ ........ v~/~u.~'~ ~,, ~'~,,,~ City ~L~* the.. t: ........ nal ~,.,L ~z-o~mgv-, is $9,325. The applicant has proposed construction of a storm water pond that will treat off-site runoff. Because the pond will provide more water quality treatment than is required by the proposed development and an outlet structure for the pond is being provided, the applicant will receive a $14,836.00 credit. When the credit is applied to the required fees, the result is a credit of $5,511.00 toward the applicant's development fees. Other Agencies The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering)) and comply with their conditions of approval. UTILITIES The plans propose to extend public sanitary sewer from an existing sanitary structure on the northeasterly corner of the parcel. The proposed sanitary sewer will run along the easterly side of the parcel and will service proposed Lots 1, 2 and 3. A permanent 20-foot wide drainage and utility easement is required over the length of the new sewer main. Also, water services will be extended from an existing watermain in Frontier Trail on the west side of the parcel. The existing Lots 4 and 5 already have sanitary and water services from West 77th Street. Overall, the sanitary sewer layout looks fine. Upon completion of the sanitary sewer improvements, it will be turned over to the City of Chanhassen for maintenance and ownership. According to the City's Finance Department records, the parcel was previously assessed for street improvements along with one sanitary sewer and water hookup unit for each of the existing homes on Lots 4 and 5. The remaining street assessment balance with interest due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording is $6,517.70. Since the developer will be responsible for extending lateral sanitary sewer service to the new lots, the lateral sewer connection charges will be waived; however, water connection charges will be required for each of the new lots (1-3). In addition, sanitary sewer and water hookup charges will be applicable Frontier Second Addition Planning Case No. 04-26 August 3, 2004 Page 6 for each of the new lots. The 2004 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 per unit for sanitary sewer and $2,814 per unit for watermain. The 2004 lateral connection charge for water is $4,739 per unit. Each of these charges is based on the number of SAC units calculated by the Met Council and are due at the time of building permit issuance. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel(s). Public utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed construction plans and specifications muse-be have been submitted~,"' ~,,,,.,~ v.^c c~....~.~ r.~,, ~ ~' for staff's review. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA and Watershed District. STREETS The plans do not show any public or private street improvements. The applicant is proposing to utilize the existing street accesses off West 77th Street for Lot 5, Frontier Trail for Lot 4, and to construct new driveways for each of the three new Lots 1, 2 and 3 off Frontier Trail. PARK DEDICATION Full park and trail fees will be collected in lieu of land dedication for the three newly created lots in the amount of $2,800 per lot with a total of $8,400. TREE PRESERVATION/LANDSCAPING Tree canopy coverage and preservation calculations for the 5 single-family lots located at Frontier Trail and West 77m Street are as follows: Total upland area (including outlots) Total canopy area (excluding wetlands) Baseline canopy coverage Minimum canopy coverage allowed Proposed tree preservation 2.61 ac or 113,691 SF 2.35 ac or 102,366 SF 9O% 55% or 1.44 ac. 59% or 1.54 ac. The developer meets the minimum canopy coverage allowed and no reforestation plantings are required. No bufferyard plantings are required since the adjoining properties are of equal zoning and the street frontages are not on collector roads. Frontier Second Addition Planning Case No. 04-26 August 3, 2004 Page 7 COMPLIANCE WITH ORDINANCE - RSF DISTRICT Lot Lot Lot Home Area Width Depth Setback Ordinance 15,000 90' 125' 30' front/rear/bluff 10' sides BLOCK 1 Lot 1 35,216 172.19' 200' 30'/30'/30' 10' Lot 2 .~..,..~,,~° ,~ 29,748 ."m', ,~ 154' 200' 30'/30'/30' 10' Lot 3 20,650 18,570 90' 200' 30'/30' 10' Lot 4 .~,,~,~,' ~ ~o~. 15,010 100' 135' 150' 30'/30' 10' Lot 5 ~..,~..,~ ~ ~ ~'~* 15,010100' ...~...J~ ~ o~,. 150' 30'/30' 10' SUBDIVISION - FINDINGS 1. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance; Finding: The subdivision meets all the requirements of the RSF, Residential Single Family District and the zoning ordinance subject to conditions in the staff report. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; Finding: The proposed subdivision is consistent with the comprehensive plan and subdivision ordinance. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; Finding: The proposed site is suitable for development subject to the conditions specified in this report Frontier Second Addition Planning Case No. 04-26 August 3, 2004 Page 8 The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; Finding: The proposed subdivision is served by adequate urban infrastructure. 5. The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage; Finding: The proposed subdivision will cause some environmental damage by removing some trees, however, improvements to a drainage pond will take place which will improve the environment. The proposed subdivision contains adequate open areas to accommodate house pads. 6. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record. Finding: The proposed subdivision will not conflict with existing easements, but rather will expand and provide all necessary easements. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: ao Lack of adequate storm water drainage. Lack of adequate roads. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. Finding: The proposed subdivision will have access to public utilities and streets. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission City Council adopt the following motions: PRELIMINARY PLAT "The m~,..;..,~ ,~;o~; .......... a ......... ~ Ac City Council approves the preliminary and final plat for Planning Case 04-26 for Frontier Second Addition for 5 lots as shown on the plans received July 2, 2004, and revised August 2, 2004, subject to the following conditions: Environmental Resources Specialist Conditions: a. Tree preservation fencing shall be installed at the edge of grading limits prior to any construction. Fencing shall be maintained until construction is completed. The applicant shall pay park fees in lieu of land dedication or trail construction on three of the five lots. Two lots are exempt from these charges due to the existing single-family homes on the property. The park fee on three single family homes totals $8,400 and is Frontier Second Addition Planning Case No. 04-26 August 3, 2004 Page 9 payable at the time of platting. The pond must be designed to NURP guidelines and sized/located to maximize water quality treatment while minimizing the amount of tree loss. All disturbed areas, as a result of construction, must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. The applicant shall apply for and obtain a building permit through the City's Building Department for any retaining wall over 4-feet in height. a. Any connection The remaining street assessment balance with interest due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording is $6,517.70. Since the developer will be responsible for extending lateral sanitary sewer service to the new lots, the lateral sewer connection charges will be waived; however, water connection charges will be required for each of the new lots (1- 3). In addition, sanitary sewer and water hookup charges will be applicable for each of the new lots. 10. Public utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. r~=,~;~=a .... ~ .... ,;...~.o · ~..,~ .... ;r;~,; ....... ~ ~. .... ~.~;,,~.~ ~ ,;...~ ..c r;.~, ~, ~+ c ...... ; .... The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. 11. The applicant must be aware that any off-site grading will require a temporary easement from the property owner. 12. Add the following City detail plates to the plans:~....~,' an< ~.'nn ,, ~.-.-~,'an' ~.~', a,, ~.~', an, 2! !O, ~-,°°nl ~,°°a° ...~q'ma ~,,,~A .~.,, ~<qal 2203, 3107, 3108, 3109, 5221, 2105, and 5313. lq Frontier Second Addition Planning Case No. 04-26 August 3, 2004 Page 10 14. Detailed grading, drainage, tree removal and erosion control plans will be required for each of the new lots at the time of building permit application for City review and approval. In addition, as-built surveys will be required on each lot prior to occupancy. 15. 16. A permanent 20-foot wide drainage and utility easement is required over the length of the new sewer main. 17. The bluff area shall be preserved. All structures shall maintain a 30-foot setback from the bluff and no grading shall occur within the bluff impact zone (i.e., the bluff and land located within 20 feet from the top of a bluff). A conservation easement shall be dedicated over the bluff area and the bluff impact zone. lQ 19. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time Steeper than 3:1 7 days 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area is not actively being worked.) These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 20. Soil tracked onto public streets shall be swept daily sWee~ or as needed. 2!. 22. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering)) and comply with their conditions of approval. 23. Building Official Conditions: a. Final grading plans and soil reports must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. b. Lots 1, 2 and 3 must be provided with separate sewer services served by a public line. Frontier Second Addition Planning Case No. 04-26 August 3, 2004 Page 11 c. Retaining walls over 4 feet high require a permit and must be designed by an engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota. d. Demolition permits must be obtained before demolishing any structures." ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact. 2. Application. 3. Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Mailing. 4. Preliminary and Final plat dated "Received 4ut-y-3 August 3, 2004". g:\plan\2004 planning cases\04-26 - frontier second addition\preliminary and final plat report cc.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN PC DATE: August 3, 2004 CC DATE: August 23, 2004 REVIEW DEADLINE: August 30, 2004 CASE #: Planning Case 04-26 BY: A1-Jaff/Sweidan/Torell/Haak/Sinclair STAFF REPORT Z < PROPOSAL: LOCATION: APPLICANT: Preliminary and Final plat approval to subdivide 2.61 acres into 5 single-family lots - Frontier Second Addition. Northeast intersection of Frontier Trail and West 77th Street. Charles R. Stinson 18304 Minnetonka Boulevard Deephaven, MN 55391 (952) 473-9503 PRESENT ZONING: RSF, Single Family Residential District 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Low Density (Net Density 1.2 - 4.0 units per acre) ACREAGE: 2.61 acres DENSITY: 1.9 Units per Acre Gross 1.9 Units per Acre Net SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Subdivision of 2.61 acres into 5 single-family lots. Two of these lots contain single-family homes. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. Staff is recommending approval of the request. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Frontier Second Addition Planning Case No. 04-26 August 3, 2004 Page 2 Since the Planning Commission meeting, the applicant submitted revised plans to address issues raised in the staff report. This has been amended to reflect the revisions. All new information will appear in bold. PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicant is proposing to subdivide 2.61 acres into 5 single-family lots. The property is zoned RSF, Single Family Residential District. The site consists of two lots that are being replatted into five lots. Two of the five lots contain single-family homes. Access to the most easterly existing homes is gained via West 77th Street. The residence located at the northeast intersection of West 77th Street and Frontier Trail gains access off of Frontier Trail. The three proposed lots will gain access via Frontier Trail also. Staff has been working with the applicant for several months. Several development scenarios were examined including the use of a private and a public street along the east portion of the property. Both options resulted in more tree removal and grading than the current request. The requested layout proposes custom grading the lots which will minimize grading and tree removal. The average lot size is 22,710 square feet with a resulting gross density of 1.9 units per acre. The site is located northeast of the intersection of Frontier Trail and West 77th Street. All five lots meet the minimum area, width, and depth requirements of the Zoning Ordinance with the exception of lots 4 and 5. The z~n:ng ............. ~;~., ~.;n;~ ~.~ ~ ..... ~., ~; ..... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~n ~ The site contains a bluff along the Frontier Second Addition Planning Case No. 04-26 August 3, 2004 Page 3 northwest portion of the site. The required setbacks will be maintained from the edge of the bluff. The site has mature trees which the applicant is making an effort to preserve. In summary, staff believes that the proposed subdivision is well designed. Minor revisions will be required. We are recommending that it be approved with conditions outlined in the staff report. PRELIMINARY PLAT The applicant is proposing to subdivide a 2.61 acre site into 5 single-family lots. The gross density of the site is 1.9 units per acre. T-br-ee-of--the All five lots exceed the minimum 15,000 square feet of lines to the north. The average lot size for this development is 22,710 square feet. A bluff occupies the southwest portion of proposed Lot I and the northwest portion of Lot 2. The ordinance requires all structures to maintain a 30-foot setback from the top and toe of the bluff. The plans indicate that this setback can be accommodated and no grading is proposed within that area. Staff notes that the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and generally consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. WETLANDS There are no wetlands on this site. GRADING~ DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL The existing site is heavily wooded with tree cover over approximately two acres of area. Because of the heavily wooded nature of the site, the applicant is proposing to custom grade each of the new housepads. Staff agrees that this is the most environmentally sensitive way to develop the site. Detailed grading, drainage, tree removal and erosion control plans will be required for each of the new lots at the time of building permit application for City review and approval. In addition, as-built surveys will be required on each lot prior to occupancy. One area on the property has been identified as bluff (i.e., slope greater than or equal to 30% and a rise in slope of at least 25 feet above the toe). The existing bluff area is between proposed Lots 1 and 2. This area must be preserved. In addition, all structures must maintain a 30-foot setback from the bluff and no grading may occur within the bluff impact zone (i.e., the bluff and land located within 20 feet from the top of a bluff). A conservation easement should be dedicated over the bluff area and the bluff impact zone. .... ~ .... ;H ~ ,~ k ...... ~ , ..... 1 ..... ;,~ ,~ ~a c~, o~,~ ...... ; ....., The applicant should be aware that any retaining walls over 4 feet in height must be designed by a Structural Engineer registered in the Sta~e of Minnesota. Also, the walls will require building pe~its from the Building Depaament. Frontier Second Addition Planning Case No. 04-26 August 3, 2004 Page 4 The plans propose to grade about 5% of the site to reroute and stabilize the existing swale at the northeasterly comer of the parcel. There is a small portion of the proposed grading which extends outside of the site limits. The applicant must be aware that this off-site grading will require a temporary easement from the property owner. The proposed development is required to maintain existing runoff rates. There is an existing drainageway that begins where an 18-inch pipe outlets into a low spot on City property adjacent to the subject site. It appears that there was a small pond on the City property with a weir that is now in disrepair. The high velocities and volumes of runoff coming out of the pipe have caused erosion along the drainageway from the pipe to the northeast comer of the subject property. Due to the lack of adequate stormwater ponding in the area, staff is recommending that the applicant construct ponding cq&~r~m:~4t~ on the neighboring City-owned parcel to the east. The pond must be designed to NURP guidelines and sized/located to maximize water quality treatment while minimizing the amount of tree loss. Easements Drainage and utility easements, a minimum of 20 feet in width, shc,'z!~ hz are provided over all drainageways and storm water ponds. Erosion Control Erosion control measures and site restoration must be developed in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook (BMPH). Tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. Silt fence must be used around the grading area. All disturbed areas, as a result of construction, must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time Steeper than 3:1 7 days 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area is not actively being worked.) These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as-needed. Frontier Second Addition Planning Case No. 04-26 August 3, 2004 Page 5 Surface Water Management Fees Water Quality Fees Because of the impervious surface associated with this development, the water quality fees for this proposed development are based on single-family residential development rates of $1,028/acre. Based on the proposed developed area of approximately 2.61 acres, the water quality fees associated with this project are $2,683. Water Quantity Fees The SWMP has established a connection charge for the different land uses based on an average city- wide rate for the installation of water quantity systems. This cost includes land acquisition, proposed SWMP culverts, open channels, and storm water ponding areas for runoff storage. Single- family residential developments have a connection charge of $2,545 per developable acre. This results in a water quantity fee of approximately $6,642 for the proposed development. The estimated total SWMP fee .... r,,j ............. j .................... r.~L ~-dmgr, is $9,325. The applicant has proposed construction of a storm water pond that will treat off-site runoff. Because the pond will provide more water quality treatment than is required by the proposed development and an outlet structure for the pond is being provided, the applicant will receive a $14,836.00 credit. When the credit is applied to the required fees, the result is a credit of $5,511.00 toward the applicant's development fees. Other Agencies The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering)) and comply with their conditions of approval. UTILITIES The plans propose to extend public sanitary sewer from an existing sanitary structure on the northeasterly corner of the parcel. The proposed sanitary sewer will run along the easterly side of the parcel and will service proposed Lots 1, 2 and 3. A permanent 20-foot wide drainage and utility easement is required over the length of the new sewer main. Also, water services will be extended from an existing watermain in Frontier Trail on the west side of the parcel. The existing Lots 4 and 5 already have sanitary and water services from West 77th Street. Overall, the sanitary sewer layout looks fine. Upon completion of the sanitary sewer improvements, it will be turned over to the City of Chanhassen for maintenance and ownership. According to the City's Finance Department records, the parcel was previously assessed for street improvements along with one sanitary sewer and water hookup unit for each of the existing homes on Lots 4 and 5. The remaining street assessment balance with interest due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording is $6,517.70. Since the developer will be responsible for extending lateral sanitary sewer service to the new lots, the lateral sewer connection charges will be waived; however, water connection charges will be required for each of the new lots (1-3). In addition, sanitary sewer and water hookup charges wilt be applicable Frontier Second Addition Planning Case No. 04-26 August 3, 2004 Page 6 for each of the new lots. The 2004 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 per unit for sanitary sewer and $2,814 per unit for watermain. The 2004 lateral connection charge for water is $4,739 per unit. Each of these charges is based on the number of SAC units calculated by the Met Council and are due at the time of building permit issuance. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel(s). Public utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed construction plans and specifications ......l~o~ b~ have been submitted ,,~ ~'~"=~.,.l~ v.~c .~.l,,,c;-~ ~r~, for staff's review. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA and Watershed District. STREETS The plans do not show any public or private street improvements. The applicant is proposing to utilize the existing street accesses off West 77th Street for Lot 5, Frontier Trail for Lot 4, and to construct new driveways for each of the three new Lots 1, 2 and 3 off Frontier Trail. PARK DEDICATION Full park and trail fees will be collected in lieu of land dedication for the three newly created lots in the amount of $2,800 per lot with a total of $8,400. TREE PRESERVATION/LANDSCAPING Tree canopy coverage and t~reservation calculations for the 5 single-family lots located at Frontier Trail and West 77 Street are as follows: Total upland area (including outlots) Total canopy area (excluding wetlands) Baseline canopy coverage Minimum canopy coverage allowed Proposed tree preservation 2.61 ac or 113,691 SF 2.35 ac or 102,366 SF 9O% 55 % or 1.44 ac. 59% or 1.54 ac. The developer meets the minimum canopy coverage allowed and no reforestation plantings are required. No bufferyard plantings are required since the adjoining properties are of equal zoning and the street frontages are not on collector roads. Frontier Second Addition Planning Case No. 04-26 August 3, 2004 Page 7 COMPLIANCE WITH ORDINANCE - RSF DISTRICT Lot Lot Lot Home Area Width Depth Setback Ordinance 15,000 90' 125' 30' front/rear/bluff 10' sides BLOCK 1 Lot 1 35,216 172.19' 200' 30'/30'/30' 10' Lot 2 ~.~,~,,,~'~ '~q~ 29,748 ."*~', ,, 154' 200' 30'/30?30' 10' Lot 3 20,650 18,570 90' 200' 30'/30' 10' Lot 4 .~,,.~,"~ ~'~* 15,010 100' 135' 150' 30'/30' 10' Lot5 ..,..,1~ ,,~,,. 15,010 100' .,~..,..~'~' '~'* 150' 30'/30' 10' SUBDIVISION - FINDINGS 1. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance; Finding: The subdivision meets all the requirements of the RSF, Residential Single Family District and the zoning ordinance subject to conditions in the staff report. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; Finding: The proposed subdivision is consistent with the comprehensive plan and subdivision ordinance. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; Finding: The proposed site is suitable for development subject to the conditions specified in this report Frontier Second Addition Planning Case No. 04-26 August 3, 2004 Page 8 The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; Finding: The proposed subdivision is served by adequate urban infrastructure. 5. The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage; Finding: The proposed subdivision will cause some environmental damage by removing some trees, however, improvements to a drainage pond will take place which will improve the environment. The proposed subdivision contains adequate open areas to accommodate house pads. 6. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record. Finding: The proposed subdivision will not conflict with existing easements, but rather will expand and provide all necessary easements. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: Lack of adequate storm water drainage. Lack of adequate roads. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. Finding: The proposed subdivision will have access to public utilities and streets. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning C,ommissie, n City Council adopt the following motions: PRELIMINARY PLAT "The m~..;., r-^~;oo; .......... No a??rova! of City Council approves the preliminary and final plat for Planning Case 04-26 for Frontier Second Addition for 5 lots as shown on the plans received July 2, 2004, and revised August 2, 2004, subject to the following conditions: Environmental Resources Specialist Conditions: a. Tree preservation fencing shall be installed at the edge of grading limits prior to any construction. Fencing shall be maintained until construction is completed. The applicant shall pay park fees in lieu of land dedication or trail construction on three of the five lots. Two lots are exempt from these charges due to the existing single-family homes on the property. The park fee on three single family homes totals $8,400 and is Frontier Second Addition Planning Case No. 04-26 August 3, 2004 Page 9 payable at the time of platting. The pond must be designed to NURP guidelines and sized/located to maximize water quality treatment while minimizing the amount of tree loss. All disturbed areas, as a result of construction, must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. The applicant shall apply for and obtain a building permit through the City's Building Department for any retaining wall over 4-feet in height. b. Add silt fence o The remaining street assessment balance with interest due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording is $6,517.70. Since the developer will be responsible for extending lateral sanitary sewer service to the new lots, the lateral sewer connection charges will be waived; however, water connection charges will be required for each of the new lots (1- 3). In addition, sanitary sewer and water hookup charges will be applicable for each of the new lots. 10. Public utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed construction plans ..,4 .... m~,~ ....... , r. .... ..--~.~,4 ~, .~ ~r e~.~, ~,~ r ...... : .... The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. I 1. The applicant must be aware that any off-site grading will require a temporary easement from the property owner. 12. Add the following City detail plates to the plans: ,nn<,,mn, ~nc,~ ~,n, ~,nc, ~,,n '~'m, ~'~n'~ 5300 and <`2n, 2203, 3107, 3108, 3109, 5221, 2105, and 5313. 1'2 Frontier Second Addition Planning Case No. 04-26 August 3, 2004 Page 10 14. Detailed grading, drainage, tree removal and erosion control plans will be required for each of the new lots at the time of building permit application for City review and approval. In addition, as-built surveys will be required on each lot prior to occupancy. 16. A permanent 20-foot wide drainage and utility easement is required over the length of the new sewer main. 17. The bluff area shall be preserved. All structures shall maintain a 30-foot setback from the bluff and no grading shall occur within the bluff impact zone (i.e., the bluff and land located within 20 feet from the top of a bluff). A conservation easement shall be dedicated over the bluff area and the bluff impact zone. 10 19. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time Steeper than 3:1 7 days 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area is not actively being worked.) These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 20. Soil tracked onto public streets shall be swept daily sweet or as needed. O1 22. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering)) and comply with their conditions of approval. 23. Building Official Conditions: a. Final grading plans and soil reports must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. b. Lots 1, 2 and 3 must be provided with separate sewer services served by a public line. Frontier Second Addition Planning Case No. 04-26 August 3, 2004 Page 11 c. Retaining walls over 4 feet high require a permit and must be designed by an engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota. d. Demolition permits must be obtained before demolishing any structures." ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact. 2. Application. 3. Public Heating Notice and Affidavit of Mailing. 4. Preliminary and Final plat dated "Received ~ August 3, 2004". g:\plan\2004 planning cases\04-26 - frontier second addition\preliminary and final plat report cc.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of Frontier Second Addition #04-26 SUB On August 3, 2004, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of a Preliminary Plat to Subdivide a 2.61 Acre Lot into Five (5) single-family Lots, Frontier Second Addition. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed development which was preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned RSF, Single-Family Residential. o The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential - Low Density (1.2 - 4.0 units per net acre). 3. The legal description of the property is shown in exhibit A. ° The Subdivision Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider seven possible adverse effects of the proposed subdivision. The seven (7) effects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance; b) The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; c) The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; d) The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; e) The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage; f) The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record; and g) The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: 2. 3. 4. Lack of adequate storm water drainage. Lack of adequate roads. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. ° The planning report #04-26 SUB, dated August 3, 2004, prepared by Sharmeen A1-Jaff, et al, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 3rd day of August, 2004. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY: Uli Sacchet, Chairman g:\plan\2004 planning cases\04-26 - frontier second addition\findings of fact.doc APPLICANT: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE (Day Time) CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION ClT~ OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED JUL 0 2 2004 ~/8~J~IHA$SEN PLA'NNING DEPT OWNER: ADDRESS: ,'¢'/YT'Y~ ~- /f~ L-E~--'7~ TELEPHONE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit Interim Use Permit Non-conforming Use Permit Planned Unit Development* Rezoning Sign Permits Sign Plan Review Site Plan Review* _~L_ Subdivision* __ Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements Variance Wetland Alteration Permit __ Zoning Appeal Zoning Ordinance Amendment X Notification Sign X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost** - $50 CUP/SPR/VAC/VARANAP/Metes & Bounds - $400 Minor SUB TOTAL FEE $ Mailing labels of all property owners within at least 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must be included with the application -OR- the City can provide this list (Carver County properties only) for an additional fee to be invoiced to the applicant. If you would like the City to provide mailing labels, check this box ]~ Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. *Twenty-six (26) full-size folded, copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8Y2" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet. **Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. 07/20/04 12:03 FAX 9522271110 CITY OF CItANIIASSEN ~003/003 PROJECT NAME: LOCATION: .~ _~,-~'- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: .~¢"-~'=- ~-/'-1 ,~-~Z~ TOTALAOREAGE: ,~. ("/ ,,'~rr~ WETLANDS PRESENT: -- YES X PRESENT ZONING: ,'~...5'/~- ~ ,~'//,.J ~ t.- ~- NO REQUESTED ZONING: PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: REASON FOR REQUEST: This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within ten business days of application submittal. A wdtten notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within ten business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request, This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. The city hereby notifies the apj;~ant that if development review cannot be completed within 60 days due to public hearing requirements and agenc~ re~.fCw, the cit,~'equires an automatic 6e-day extension for development review. Development review shall be comp ~f'ec~ ¢~i /f20 da2C's unless additional review extensions are ap, proved by the applicant. Appl~ation Received on r/~P~C FeoPaiO ~Z~P RecoiptNo. ~ ~'~ The applicant should contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Friday prior to the meeting. If not contacted, a copy of the report will be mailed to the applicant's address. G:~plan\forms\Development Review Application~DOC FRONTIER SECOND Chanhassen, MN Developer: Charles R. Stinson 18304 Minnetonka Blvd. Deephaven, MN 55391 Existing Legal Description Parcel No. 1 That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (SW ¼ of SE ¼) of Section 12, Township 116, Range 23, described as follows, viz: Beginning at the point of intersection of the north line of St. Aloys Street and the east line of St. Francis Street extended in the Village of Chanhassen, according to the plat of said Village on file and of record in the Office of the Register of Deeds for said County; thence North 567.62 feet more or less to the south line of Government Lot 4 of said Section 12, thence east along the South line of said Lot 4, 100 feet; thence south parallel to the east line of St. Francis Street extended 568.27 feet more or less to the north line of St. Aloys Street; thence west along the north line of St. Aloys Street 100 feet to the point of beginning. (Carver County, Minnesota.) Parcel No. 2 That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (SW lA of SE ¼) of Section 12, Township 116, Range 23, described as follows, viz: Beginning at a point on the north line of St. Aloys Street 100 feet east of the intersection of said north line with the east line of St. Francis Street extended, in the Village of Chanhassen; thence North 568.27 feet more or less to the south line of Government Lot 4 of said Section 12; thence east along the South line of said Lot 4, 100 feet; thence south parallel to the east line of St. Francis Street extended 568.92 feet more or less to the north line of St. Aloys Street; thence ,,vest along the north line of St. Aloys Street 100 feet to the point of beginning, according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof, Carver County, Minnesota NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 04-27 CITY OF CHANHASSEN NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, August 17, 2004, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for an Interim Use Permit for grading, excavation and slope restoration on property zoned Agricultural Estate District (A-2) located south of Hennepin County Regional Railroad, north of State Highway 212 and east of Sorenson Addition - Moon Valley Gravel Mine. Applicant: Beatrice Zwiers & Moon Valley Aggregates, Inc. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Robert Generous, Senior Planner Email: bgenerous @ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1131 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on August 5, 2004) CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) SS. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on July 22, 2004, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Planning Case No. 04-26 - Frontier Second Addition to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. 'k~en J. Eng~h~]dt, Deput~y Clerk Subscribed and sworn to before me this_~~ ! day of -.~¢t l,,{ ,2004. " .... Notary P~blic ~. ,:,, F:, Disclaimer This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in vadous city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. If errors or discrepancies are found please contact 952-227-1107. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third padies which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided. Disclaimer This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in vadous city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. If errors or discrepancies are found please contact 952-227-1107. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any dam. ages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which adse out of the user's access or use of data provided. Public Hearing Notification Area (500 feet) Frontier Second Addition NE Corner of Frontier Trail & West 77th Street City of Chanhassen Planning Case No. 04-26 Circle Del Rio Drive Trail Subject Property st) W 77th S! Chan View [-'-] W 78th St WAYNE RUDOLPH ANDERSON & JOAN SOPHIA WILLMAN-ANDERSON 204 CHAN VW CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9707 ROBERT C BLAD 7602 ERIE AVE CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9715 RAYMOND J & LYNETTE M BLEDSAW 7609 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9768 MICHAEL A BOGDEN 7617 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9609 JEFFREYW & MARY L BORNS 7199 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9605 LORI ANN BOTTENFIELD 7522 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9610 JAMES A BOYUM & WILLIAM M BOYUM 8805 SUNSET TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9404 DEAN C & JANET M BURDICK 206 CHAN VIEW CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9707 DANIEL J & JEANNE M BURKE 225 77TH ST W CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9709 RALPH W & MARLENE K BURRELL 7555 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9610 CARVER COUNTY HRA 705 WALNUT ST N CHASKA MN 55318-2039 CITY OF CHANHASSEN C/O BRUCE DEJONG 7700 MARKET BLVD PO BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-0147 CHAPEL HILL ACADEMY 3O6 78TH ST W CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9734 RICHARD J CORWINE 7600 ERIE AVE CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9715 KATHLEEN BRAZIL DELANCEY PO BOX 24 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-0024 TED H & KATHLEEN S DELANCEY 7507 FRONTIER TRL PO BOX 24 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-0024 ANTHONY T & MARY E DOPPLER 7508 ERIE AVE CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7903 PATRICK M FITZIMONS 4444 BANBURY LN HOPKINS MN 55345-2702 DANIELW & AUDREY E FUELLING 222 77TH ST W CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9799 RICHARD & KATHY GAVERT 7701 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9712 FRANK B GIGLER & JENNIFER C MILLIRON 7585 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9610 DONALD D & MARY GOETZE 7610 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9609 RICHARD & ANN MARIE HAGSTROM 7554 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9680 WILLIAM P HANSON 7607 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9768 CLARK DENNIS HORN 7608 ERIE AVE CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9715 ANNA IVERSON BOX 1 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-0001 MARY E JANSEN ETAL 7720 ERIE AVE CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9713 ROBERT & ADELINE F KAHL 203 77TH ST W CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9711 SUNDEEP KARNIK & SADHANA PARALKAR 1530 STATE ST S UNIT 18-C CHICAGO IL 60605-2981 BERNARD & HELEN KERBER 221 77TH ST W CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9711 JOHN E & KAREN M KRAEMER 7703 ERIE AVE CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9612 DAVID J & LESLIE A KRONK 7561 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9681 MARC J LARSEN & LA JEAN E BYLER 7706 ERIE AVE CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9612 JOHN B & GENELL M W LEMLEY 7523 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9610 THOMAS V & NANCY G MANARIN 7552 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9680 PAUL MARAVIGLI 226 CHAN VIEW CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9613 MICHAEL C & KRISTIN M MATTSON 2560 BRIDLE CREEK TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9372 MARTHA E MCALLISTER 7510 ERIE AVE CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7903 RICHARD & ROSE MARY MINGO 7601 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9768 MARK J & KAROL J MOTZKO 76O6 ERIE AVE CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9715 RICHARD A & ELIZABETH M NUSTAD 7721 ERIE AVE CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9713 GREGORY J & KAREN J ODASH 221 CHAN VIEW CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9750 THOMAS A & LYNN M PAULY 7721 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9712 NICHOLAS & PATRICIA PEKAREK 202 CHAN VIEW CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9707 BERNARD A & COLEEN M POIRIER 3O4 77TH ST W CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9798 ROBERT SCOTT POLLOCK 7603 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9768 CURTIS G & NANCY A ROBINSON 202 77TH ST W CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9702 RONALD & ELAINE ROESER 222 CHAN VIEW CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9613 STEVEN M ROGERS 7520 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9610 PAUL F & RITA M ROJINA 220 77TH ST W CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9799 DONALD A & JUDITH M SCHMIEG PO BOX 397 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-0397 JESSE SCHNEIDER 224 CHAN VIEW P O BOX 143 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-0143 JESSE J SCHNEIDER PO BOX 143 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-0143 LARRY A & KATHLEEN A SCHROEDER 7720 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9753 BLANCHE M SCHUTROP 3O2 CHAN VIEW CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9714 GEORGE D & MARGARET H SHORBA 306 CHAN VIEW CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9714 TONJA ST MARTIN 207 CHAN VIEW CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9701 KERMIT M & AUDRE A STAKE 205 77TH ST W CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9711 STREETER & ASSOCIATES INC 18312 MINNETONKA BLVD WAYZATA MN 55391-3232 DOUGLAS J & WENDY K SUEDBECK 7605 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9768 AUTUMN L THAYER 7528 ERIE AVE CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7903 KAY TOUCHETTE 7389 VANCOUVER RD EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346-3824 KAREN L ZELLNER & FLORENCE H COLEMAN 7616 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9609 JAMES & ARLENE ZIMMERMAN 7602 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9609 RICH SLAGLE 7411 FAWN HILL ROAD CHANHASSEN MN 55317