5 Moon Valley Clean Up Grant
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7700 Markel Boulevard
POBnx147
Cr,ar'llasserl WI 55317
Administration
Phm:e 952 227 1100
952227.1110
Building Inspections
952.227.1180
952.227.1190
Engineering
952.227.1160
9522271170
Finance
P110IW 952227.1140
Fax 9522271110
Park & Recreation
Prloflc 9522271120
Fal 952 227 1110
RccrcallOll Center
2310 Couller Boulevard
PilOne 9522271400
Fax 952227 1404
Planning &
Natural Resources
PhOl18 9522271130
Fax 9522271110
Public Works
1591 Park Road
Phone 9522271300
Fax 952.2271310
Senior Center
Phole 952227 1125
Fax952 227.1110
Web Site
www.cl.cllanllassell.I!rII.US
.,.-
.::>
-
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Todd Gerhardt, city Manager
FROM:
Kate Aanenson AICP, Community Development Director
DATE:
October 11, 2004
SUBJ:
Moon Valley Contamination Clean-up Grant
BACKGROUND
On September 27, 2004 the City Council approved the Interim Use Permit for
Moon Valley. The applicant, Pemtom Land Company, is requesting to have the
City support a grant application for the Minnesota Department Of Employment
and Economic Development. A grant request and the resolution for approval are
attached.
ANALYSIS
The grant application is due November 1 st. The applicant is requesting the
maximum amount of $50,000. The City will be the pass-through agency for the
funding. There is a requirement for the City to provide the 25% match for the
grant. This would amount to $12,500 which staff intends to have a memorandum
of understanding with Pemtom Land Company that the City would be reimbursed
for those costs. Staff supports the clean up of the site and the request for funding.
RECOMMENDA nON
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached resolution for the
funding request.
A TT ACHMENTS
1. Location map.
2. Resolution.
3. Grant application.
g:\plan\2004 planning cases\04-27 - moon valley gravel mine\moon valley clean up 10-11-04 cc memo.doc
The City of Chanhassen · A grOWlllg COll1l11Ulllly with clean lakes. quallly scllDulS.ì dlarrilllli¡
:ral's beallliul perks r¡ieal place 10 live. work. alld play
Location Map
Moon Valley Contamination
Clean-up Grant
City of Chanhassen
, ~Q
GlO~Ò Q<" :,/ /' '" . ".
US Z'Z f\~i~9 ,e, ,\ '.
µ;~;j
\. '
- ----.------- -.....-..---...--- ..--..-.--
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
DA TE:
October 11.2004
RESOLUTION NO:
MOTION BY:
SECONDED BY:
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CONT AMINA TION CLEANUP GRANT APPLICATION
AND COMMITTING LOCAL MATCH AND AUTHORIZING CONTRACT SIGNATURE FOR
MOON V ALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Counci I of the City of Chanhassen as follows:
1. That the Chanhassen City Council hereby approves the Contamination Cleanup grant
application to be submitted to the Department of Employment and Economic Development
(DEED), by the City of Chanhassen for the Moon Valley site.
2. That the City of Chanhassen acts as the legal sponsor for project(s) contained in the
Contamination Cleanup Grant Program and that the Mayor and City Manager are hereby
authorized to apply to the Department of Employment and Economic Development for funding
of this project on behalf of the City of Chanhassen.
3. That the City of Chanhassen has the legal authority to apply for financial assistance, and the
institutional, managerial, and financial capability to ensure adequate project administration.
4. That the sources and amounts of the local match identified in the application are committed to
the project identified.
5. That the City of Chanhassen has not violated any Federal, State or local laws pertaining to
fraud, bribery, graft, kickbacks, collusion, conflict of interest or other unlawful or corrupt
practice.
6. That upon approval of its application by the state, the City of Chanhassen may enter into an
agreement with the State of Minnesota for the above-referenced project, and that the City of
Chanhassen certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulation as stated in all
contract agreements.
7. The Mayor and City Manager of the City of Chanhassen are hereby authorized to execute such
agreements as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the applicant.
Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 11 th day of October, 2004.
ATTEST:
Todd Gerhardt, City Manager
Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor
YES
NO
ABSENT
g:\admin\resol\moon valley.doc
FY 04 - FY 05
CONTAMINATION INVESTIGATION & RAP DEVELOPMENT
GRANT APPLICATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Instructions
Purpose/Background.. ....... ... ....... ..... ...................................................... .................. ..... II
Application Deadlines.... ............... ................................................. ............................... II
Funding Availability...... ........ ................................ ...... ........ ........... .... ... ....................... II
Eligible Costs. ....... ............ ..... ....... ......................... .... ........................... ................. ....... II
Local Match Requirement...... ... .... ....... ................ ....... ............................ ............... ....... II
Eligi ble Applicants...................................................................................................... .III
Quality Site Assessments.... .................... ........................................ ........ .... ................ .III
Quali fying Sites.......................................................................................................... .III
Gran tAw ard Cri teri a .................................................................................................. .III
Application
I. Site Information ...... .................................... .... ..... .................................... .... ....... ..2
II. Site History......... ............ ............ ......................................................... .......... ..... ..3
III. Contamination Investigation Information.................... ........................ ........ .... ... ..3
IV. Cost Analysis... ..... .......... .................................................. ....... .................. ....... ....4
Budget.................................................................................................................. .4
Budget Sources and Uses Table....... ............................... ................... ............ .......4
Fi nanci ng...............................................................................................................4
V. Site Value..............................................................................................................5
VI. Redevelopment Potential... ............................................. ............................. ...... ...5
Job Creation & Retention...... ........... ............................... ............ ...................... ....6
Project Schedule.................................................................................................... 7
VII. Third Party/Company Commitment Information .................................................8
VIII. Payment Information............................................................................................ 8
IX. Resol utions............................................................................................................ 9
Investigation
FY 04 - FY 05
CO NT AMINA TION INVESTIGATION AND RAP DEVELOPMENT
GRANT APPLICATION
MINNESOT A DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
1st National Bank Building
332 Minnesota Street, Suite E200
St. Paul, MN 55101-1351
Contact: Brownfields and JOBZ Unit
Local: 651-296-5005 Toll Free: 1-800-657-3858
***YOU MUST READ THE FOLLOWING NARRATIVE TO
FULLY UNDERSTAND THE APPLICATION PROCESS***
INSTRUCTIONS
PURPOSEIBACKGROUND: Under the authority of the Contamination Cleanup Grant
Program, Minnesota Statutes §§ 116J.551-1161.558, the Department of Employment and
Economic Development (DEED) is able to award grant funds toward the costs of investigating
for contaminants and developing a Response Action Plan (RAP) to clean contamination. The
Contamination Cleanup Grant Program was created by the legislature in 1993 to provide funds
for cleaning contaminated sites. The Program was amended in 1997 to allow DEED to grant
funds for contamination investigation and RAP development. The investigation grant funds are
intended to jump-start the environmental remediation process so that properties believed to be
polluted can be cleaned and redeveloped.
APPLICATION DEADLINES: The Contamination Investigation and RAP Development
Grant Program operates on a semiannual grant cycle in conjunction with the Contamination
Cleanup Grant Program. Deadlines for making application are November 1 and May 1 of each
year. Complete applications must be received at DEED by 4 p.m. on either date. In the event
that these days fall on a weekend, the deadline will be the following business day. You must
submit the original application and 2 copies. NOTE: If you are applying for investigation
funds for more than one site, a separate application must be completed for each site.
FUNDING A V AILABILITY: Up to $500,000 of the total $16.7 Million available for the
Contamination Cleanup Grant Program for the 2004 - 2005 biennium is available for
investigation and RAP development grants.
ELIGIBLE COSTS: The legislation allows DEED to award grants for up to $50,000, or 75%
of the total investigation cost, whichever is less, for investigating for contaminants and
developing a RAP. No more than $250,000 per fiscal year may be awarded for investigation
grants. Applicants may be at the beginning of the investigation process and apply for all
investigation and RAP development costs up-front. Or, if an applicant has completed and
financed a portion of the investigation on their own, they may apply for reimbursement of the
incurred and financed costs along request for the remainder of the investigation and RAP
development costs. If the entire investigation is complete, you should not apply through the
investigation program but may apply for cleanup funds if site cleanup is necessary.
LOCAL MATCH REQUIREMENT: The applicant must pay for at least one-quarter of the
total estimated investigation costs as a local match. At least twelve percent of the local match
must come from unrestricted funding sources.
Investigation
11
FY 04 - FY 05
ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS: Eligible applicants include statutory or home rule charter cities,
counties, housing and redevelopment authorities, economic development authorities, and port
authorities. (Note: A site may be publicly or privately owned.)
QUALITY SITE ASSESSMENTS: Applicants must work with the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency (MPCA) in assessing the site and developing a RAP. Requiring applicants to
follow the MPCA investigation and RAP development guidelines ensures that the state is paying
for quality site assessments and allows the applicant to qualify for a Contamination Cleanup
Grant (which requires an approved RAP from the MPCA). The MPCA has guidance documents
and fact sheets available for performing investigations. The guidance documents should be
followed throughout the investigation and RAP development process. For more information or
to get copies of these documents you may contact the MPCA at 651-296-7291.
QUALIFYING SITES: A site qualifies for a Contamination Investigation and RAP
Development Grant if the following criteria are met:
1) If you are an applicant from the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, your municipality
must be participating in the Metropolitan Council's Local Housing Incentives
Program. For more information on this program, call Guy Peterson at 651-602-1418.
2) It is expected that the site will be improved with building or other improvements. If
the investigation identifies the need to remediate, it is expected that cleanup will be
accomplished so that the site can be developed. The improvements should provide
public benefit such as a tax base increase, new jobs, or other public benefits. Final
development of polluted sites could include, for example, commercial, industrial,
office or housing development.
Housing developments should include an affordability component. There should
either be affordable units on the site, or units committed to another site within the
applicant's jurisdiction. Housing developments that do not include any affordable
units (on- or off- site) may not be considered for funding under this program.
"Affordability" is defined using U.S. Housing and Urban Development and/or
Metropolitan Council standards, determined by the municipality.
GRANT AWARD CRITERIA: The law directs DEED to make grants for sites that provide
the highest return in public benefits for the public costs incurred. In order to evaluate the
applications for public benefits with respect to the costs incurred, the law further specifies
priorities which DEED must consider. The legislative priorities listed below have been assigned
maximum point values in order to systematically award grants in each cycle:
1. MPCA review of the potential threat to human health and the environment that would
be reduced or eliminated by investigation and cleanup. Maximum = 30 points.
2. The social value to the community that will result from testing, cleaning, and
redeveloping the site. Social value includes the time frame, the number of new and
retained jobs, the importance of the proposed public facilities, the removal of
blighting influences at the site, the readiness of the project, the development potential
and the financial health of the project. Maximum = 55 points.
Investigation
111
FY 04 - FY 05
3. The potential increase in the property tax base of the local taxing jurisdiction.
Maximum = 30 points.
4. The probability that the site will be investigated for contamination without the use of
government money. Maximum = 10 points.
5. The amount of investigation costs for the site. Maximum = 10 points.
6. The amount of the commitment of the municipality or other local resources to pay for
part of the investigation costs. Maximum = 10 points.
Investigation
IV
FY 04 - FY 05
Investigation
n~i'tjY~I· .y Y Department of Employment
Co/l¡nriêsð7ëit
CONTAMINATION INVESTIGATION AND RAP
DEVELOPMENT
GRANT APPLICATION
Cover Page
Applicant: City of Chanhassen
Head of Applicant Agency: Community Develof]ment
Applicant Address: 7700 Market Blvd. PO Box 147
City:
Zip Code: 55317
Chanhassen. MN
Project Contact Person: Kate Aanenson
Phone:
Fax:
952-227-1110
952-227-1100
E-mail: kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us
Application Author/Preparer: James S. Aiken. P.G.
Phone: _952_-_470_-_0983
E-mail: iaiken@mccainassociates.com
Department of Employment and Economic Development
500 Metro Square '121 7th Plate East. Saint Paul. )IN 55101-2112 . USA
651-297-1291 . 800·657-3858 . Fax 651-296-1290' TTYITDD: 651-282·6142 '800-366-2906 . ",,"...deed.state.mn.DS
An equalopporlUl.Îty employer /lnd sen,ice provider.
FY 04 - FY 05
I. SITE INFORMATION
1. Name of Site: Moon Valley Gun RanJ!e
Site address: 100 FlyinJ! Cloud Drive, PIN: 250360200
City (or Township): Chanhassen County: Carver
Minnesota 2002 Legislative District # _A
34
B
55318
Zip Code
(Note: The Minnesota Legislature has a tool to look up legislative district numbers. You must have
a precise address and know the zip code of the site. Go to:
http://maps.commissions.leg.state. mn. us/w ebsi tel di stri cts/)
2. Is applicant enrolled in an MPCA Program?
Phone: 651-296-7297
Phone:
Phone:
VIC Prog. I.D:
VPIC Prog. I.D:
LUST Prog. I.D:
Other:
19420 VIC Project Manager SaralJfJO
VPIC Proj.Manager
LUST Proj. Manager
3. Is the project site publicly or privately owned? Private
Current property owner(s): Beatrice Zweirs dba Moon Valley AJ!J!reJ!ates
When was the property purchased? 1986 For what amount? $425,000
Who will own the site during investigation? Beatrice Zwiers dba Moon Valley AJ!J!reJ!ates
When was/will the property purchased? NA For what amount? NA
Who will own the site during cleanup? _Beatrice Zwiers dba Moon Valley
Aggregates
When will the property purchased? NA For what amount? NA
Who will own the site after cleanup?
When will the property purchased?
Zwiers dba Moon Valley AJ!J!reJ!ates
NA For what amount? NA
Who will own the project site during development? Pemtom Land Company
When will the property be purchased? 2008 For what amount? $6,000,000 (2008 dollars)
Who will own the project site after development? Individual homeowners.
When will the property be purchased? 2005 throuJ!h 2010 For what amount?
Purchase price dependent on unit - for 375 units with averaJ!e of $200,000 per unit, purchase
price will be $200K x 375 = $75 million.
4. Name(s) of current environmental consultant and legal counsel if applicable
Consultant James Aiken, P.G. and John McCain, P.E.; McCain and Associates, Inc.
Phone: 952-470-0983
Investigation
2
FY 04 - FY 05
Attorney Brian Weisberf!, (Sief!el, Brill, Greupner, Duffv & Foster, P.A.)
Phone (612) 337-6100
5. Legal description of the site:
Government Lot 1, excluding 5.95 acres south of northerly right of way for Highway 212/169 in
Section 36, Township 116N, Range 23 West, Carver County.
6. Attach an accurate and legible site and location map that shows:
a) The current condition of the site including labeled structures;
b) The proposed development of the site including labeled structures; and
c) The suspected location(s) of contamination.
See Attachment A - also includes land use and planninf! maps.
Please attach photographs, in addition to maps, if they are available.
7. Acreage of Site
39.8
Sq. Ft. of Site 1,733,695
8. Zoning/Land use:
A. Current:
Industrial
Mixed use
Commercial Residential
Other (specify) X (Af!ricultural)_
B. What the is expected zoning/land use after investigation and cleanup:
Industrial
Mixed Use
X
Commercial _ _ Residential
Other (specify)
X
The Property is an integral part of several properties that will be developed concurrently as part of an
overall development plan. A property to the southwest, also owned by Zweirs has been proposed for
commerciallresidential development by Pemtom Land Company and is included in the discussion of
the development plans for the Property. The total project will be approximately 75 acres, including 43
acres of open land/sceniclbluff/recreational. Of the 32 acres developed, 25 acres will be a mixture of
low and high density housing with 7 acres reserved for integrated office/retail.
9. Current economic condition:
Vacant lot X
Developed site_ (explain below)
10. If the site is currently developed with unoccupied buildings, how long have the
buildings been vacant? Approximatelv 15 vears
11. Please describe the condition of any buildings on the Site?
Most of the site is undeveloped mine land, several structures related to gun range and mining are still
present:
A. The old house was built in 1956 and is dilapidated, structurally failing, and will need to be
Investigation
3
FY 04 - FY 05
abated and demolished
B. Gun range office and firing house are non-domicile shelters with post and 2x4 construction
C. The scale house is a mobile home trailer that can be removed from the site.
D. Fugitive dumping and miscellaneous semi-truck trailers are stored on the Property along US
212. This area will also require some investigation and clean up.
12. Please describe how Site redevelopment will spur adjacent development?
The former gun range and mine are currently a source of erosion and blight. The increase in
high-density residential housing will support the local tax base and invigorate existing and
proposed new business along Flying Cloud Drive. The residential development on the Property
has been proposed as part of comprehensive mixed use development including a new business
commercial corridor west of the site. The actual development of the property will not occur until
sewer and water are connected at the site, however, the schedule for sewer and water can be
moved up if the clean up is completed sooner. It is critical that investigation and clean up begin
early because the slope restoration and grading of the site will require five years before
development can begin. This is because the engineering estimates callfor over 1,000,000 cubic
yards of fill to be removed from the site. This large volume of soil will require several years to be
trucked off of the site. In order to begin removing the soil, each area of the site must be
investigated and cleaned up. An interim use permit has been approved by the Chanhassen City
Council as the first part of future development. Future phases of development cannot be finalized
until appropriate approvals are granted by the City ofChanhassen. A copy of the Interim Use
Permit Letter is included as Attachment B.
II. SITE HISTORY
13. Please attach a brief synopsis on the history and general background of this site. This includes
but is not limited to former uses and occupants of the site, suspected causes of contamination,
etc. Also describe the current condition of the site and include a description of existing
structures and existing occupants of the site.
See Attachment C.
III. CONT AMINA TION INVESTIGATION INFORMA TION
14. Current status of the investigation.
A. Is the site enrolled in the MPCA VIC Program? Yes
B. Has a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment been completed?
No - A Phase I is in progress; as required by the Interim Use Permit (Attachment B) general a
site reconnaissance and preliminary site investigation have been completed to focus specifically
on the lead issue on portions of the Property that are likely to have negligible impact from past
shooting on the Property.
Reports are included in Attachment D. If so, attach a copy of the Phase I to this report.
Investigation
4
FY 04 - FY 05
C. Do you have an approved work plan to begin implementation of a Phase II? No
D. Has any of the work plan been implemented? No
E. Please provide copies of any approval and/or comment letters you have received from
the MPCA VIC Program and also provide copies of any reports documenting investigation
activities that have been conducted at the site to date.
15. If any soil or water samples have already been collected, briefly summarize the identified
contamination at the site to date (identified compounds, concentration, etc.). Also summarize the
objective of the future planned investigation.
Soil lead concentrations were detected at 680 mglkg in one sample located near the trap range
above the Tier 1 SRV of 400 mg/kg. Other samples within the shotfall zone are below Tier 1 SRV
criteria. Future investigation will collect more data from near the firing line of the trap range, the
backstop berms of the rifle ranges, and near sedimentation ponds and basins that collect runoff
from these areas. Some groundwater investigation will be required due to evidence of sandy
(permeable) soil and shallow groundwater near the base of the bluff nearest to the Minnesota
River Wildlife Refuge.
The goal of investigation is to assess impact on human health and the environment as well as to
define areas of potential lead and other contamination so that appropriate clean up strategy can
be employed. At this stage it is believed that some lead recycling and other metal recovery will be
possible. Otherwise, excavation combined with off-site disposal and on-site stabilization are
treatment methods that are often utilized for small-arms firing range (SAFR) sites. Due to the
nature and distribution of lead discharged at the Trap Range, the potential area of impact is large
and there will be a significant quantity of soil sampling required to reliably assess environmental
risk as well as engineering needs.
IV. COST ANALYSIS
BUDGET
16. What are the total investigation and RAP development costs? $116,200
Due to the large area of the site that requires investigation, the total costs of the project are likely
to far exceed the budget shown below for DEED committed funds. The DEED Grant budget
request has been allocated to the largest portion of the project expense, which is for the Phase II
Investigation.
17. How much are you requesting from DEED? (This amount cannot exceed $50,000 or 75%
of the total cost, whichever is less.) $ 50,000
Complete the budget table below. If you have already completed a Phase I investigation, you may
include that cost in your budget in addition to the future investigation & RAP development costs to be
incurred.
Investigation
5
FY 04 - FY 05
BUDGET SOURCES & USES
[Eligible Acti vities for Datc(s) DEED Local Local
Investigation and RAP % Complete Completed Request + Match # 1 Match # 2 Total
lDevelopment mmlyy + =
- -
Phase I ESA 20 0 0 0 4,000
Preliminary Site Investigation 90 10/6/04 0 0 0 15,000
Phase II Work Plan 0 0 0 0 5,000
IPhase II InvestigationJReport 0 50,000 6250 6250 62,500
Owner-funded Phase II Remainder 0 0 0 0 22,500
FS/RAP Development 0 0 0 0 7,200
Total - Investigation & RAP Development: $131,200
18. Are any costs listed in this budget eligible for funding from other funding sources?
Yes
19. If any of the activities listed above are partially or fully completed, how were those activities
financed?
Owner (Zwiers)
FINANCING
20. Please submit an audit, or financial statement if an audit is not available, from the municipality in
which the site is located.
21. Is there a possibility that the site will be cleaned up without DEED money? _X_ Yes _ No
Explain your above yes or no answer.
The property owner has agreed to conduct investigation and clean up actions that are economically
justified for the Site. As with many properties, the minimum cost thresholdfor investigation and
clean up is to bring soil concentrations down to levels consistent with the current land use (in this
case mining/gun range). However, this level of clean up would not be suitable for residential land
use. With the DEED grant, the investigation and clean up can be expanded to accommodate a land
use and development plan that will have a significant positive societal and economic impact for the
community. Without DEED assistance, there are barriers to development that may result in less
desirable land use and/or less favorable development plans.
V. SITE VALUE
22. What is the current assessed value of the site? $ 688,000
Investigation
6
FY 04 - FY 05
23. What is the estimated assessed value of the site should contamination be found and
remediation completed? $ 688.000
There is no evidence that the current assessed value includes a reduction for environmental impairment.
What is the estimated assessed value of the site after redevelopment? $ $6.000.000
A. How were these figures determined? Current data from Carver County Assessor and the
purchase offer price from Pemtom Land Company is assumed to be the developed site value in the
first year after redevelopment. After that, the sold units will contribute to the total taxable property
base.
B. Who determined them? Compiled bv James Aiken (McCain) from the sources indicated
above.
VI. REDEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL
24. Explain the likely use of the site after investigation and cleanup.
The Property is a key piece of a broader development strategy proposedfor the 212 corridor along the
Minnesota River. Since the development plan is predicated upon the availability of the Property for
development, the financial aspects for the entire project is described herein. The land use will be
mixed use with residential and office/retail opportunities. The project will be modeled after the
existing Hennepin Village project by the same developer and located in Eden Prairie. Key elements
will include a diverse mixture of affordable and market housing combined into a transit friendly,
affordable community along a major collector road. A unique element of the development will be the
availability of affordable housing in a bluff view setting that is that is typically only available to the
upper-end market. Additionally, the proximity to the Minnesota Wildlife Refuge, the development
provides a well-connected green belt and for recreation and wild life habitat. The Property will
increase the acreage of undeveloped scenic bluff property, connect the Richard T. Anderson
Conservation Area to the east to the LRT/Regional Trail and Outlot G of the Settler's West
Subdivision to the north.
25. If the site will be redeveloped for residential use, provide the following data:
TOTAL # OF RENTAL UNITS TO BE DEVELOPED
Monthly rental cost per unit $
Number of affordable units
Construction cost per unit $
Current market for rental units indicates that this will not be a primary goal of the project.
TOT AL # OF OWNER-OCCUPIED UNITS TO BE DEVELOPED 375
Purchase price per unit/home 75 units @ $220.000 to $300.000
Number of affordable units/homes 300 units @ $175 to $200.000
Construction cost per unit: $145.000 to $210.000 (A verage)
In vestigation
7
FY 04 - FY 05
* Housing developments should include an affordability component.
26. What are the current property taxes on the site? $16,636
27. What are the projected property taxes for the site when the site is cleaned and developed?
Approximatelv $1,110,000 assuminf! averaf!e appraised value of $200,000.
Investigation
8
FY 04 - FY 05
JOB CREATION & RETENTION
28. Project the number of new full-time jobs that will be created after cleanup and development of the
site. Total New Jobs: 29
Using the Hennepin Village development (Attachment E) as a guide, the development might include a
gas!convenience store, three general retail businesses, a retail/medical office, a bank branch office,
and a fast food restaurant. The following assume that 1 full time and three to four part-time positions
are created for each operation. Additional staffing needs are not included as these positions may be
filled with transfers from other locations.
NEW JOBS TABLE
Position Title Total # of Total # of Part- Annual Wage Expected
Full-Time Time Jobs per Job Hiring Date
Jobs
Retail/Office 3 9 40,000 2009
Medical Office 1 3 50,000 2009
Bank 1 3 45,000 2009
Gas/Convenience 1 3 35,000 2009
Fast Food 1 4 35,000 2009
29. State the number of full-time jobs that will be retained as a direct result of this site's development?
Total Retained Jobs: NA
RET AINED JOBS TABLE
Position Title Total # of Total # of Part- Annual Wage Former
Full-Time Time Jobs per Job Location of
Jobs Retained Jobs
In vestigation
9
FY 04 - FY 05
(The rest of this page is intentionally left blank.)
In vestigation
10
V)
o
>--
u..
I
"T
o
>--
u..
~
...;¡
::J
Q
~
::I:
U
rJJ
¡;....
U
~
~
o
"
Q..
u
<1)
"3
u
<1)
..c
u
VJ
VJ
t::
.S
......
ro
b1)
.....
......
VJ
<1)
>
t::
U
<1)
VJ
o
0...
o
I-
0...
<1)
..c
......
..c
u
:E
:s
t::
.....
~
VJ
'-'
I-
ro
<1)
»
u
t::
ro
~
VJ
'-'
..c
......
t::
o
E
<1)
..c
......
b1)
t::
.....
......
u
;.¡j
t::
<1)
::)
u
<1)
..c
u
VJ
b1)
t::
.~
o
o
4-
<1)
..c
......
<1)
ã)
P..
E
o
u
o
(")
J:
I-
Z
OLt)<!
:E 0
e~""
z!ã..."
« w
~>-:E
«
w <!
>-
>-
m
en
~
en
«
l-
e
w
...J
::J
e
w
J:
()
en
c
z
Q
¡gCf)
o
C\I <!
a:
~ ..."
>-..."
:E
<!
:E
u.
....
c
z
n
Cf)
:E
u.
..."
c Ö
><
z Ö
n Ö Ö Ö
Cf)
d
..."
..."
g:E
o
C\I
a: <!
<!
w
>-
I:
o
~
+=
<! :ß
Cf) >
~ W I:
Cf)~.!
;:! ~ èñ
= ~
11. III
I:
E
¡¡¡
...
Q.
><
Ö
><
><
I:
o
+=
I: III
12 .§
Q. üi
..:.: Q)
... >
o I:
:;:~
= -
Q) èñ
1/1 =
III Q)
= 1/1
Q. III
=
Q.
><
Ö
~ ><
Ö ~ ><
~
Ö
_ I:
t: ä; .2
gEm
Q) g ë
a:Qj~
= > Q)
:::~~
~Il.
Q.~g.
a:
><
><
><
><
><
Ö
><
><
><
><
><
><
><
><
><
><
><
><
><
><
><
><
><
><
><
><
><
><
><
><
><
><
Ö
><
><
><
><
><
><
><
><
><
><
Ö
-
-
If)
o
o
f"1
~~
11.1:
" .-
1:"
III f!
I:C)
0-
'- I:
mQ)
~~
1/1 0
(1)-
a: Q)
>
(I) Q)
.-:: C
Cf)
~
,...,
(")
.,.,
';
~
I
~
......
~
't:\
:::
o
~
~
Q..
E
o
'-I
Q..
~
"
c:
.g
0-:
.~o
"
>
.5
FY 04 - FY 05
VII. THIRD PARTY/COMPANY COMMITMENT INFORMATION
31. If there is a commitment from a third paI1y to develop on the site, please complete the following:
Third Party/Company Name: Pemtom Land Company
Contact Person: Mr. Dan Herbst
Title: President
Phone Number (include area code): 952
/
937
/
0716
32. Please attach a commitment letter from the developer or attach other commitment documentation.
(If you cannot obtain a commitment letter from the developer, please explain.)
VIII. PAYMENT INFORMATION
33. List below the appropriate information to indicate where grant payments should be made.
Mailing Address: 7700 Market Blvd PO Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317
952-227 -1100
Contact Person: Kate Aanenson
E-mail address:kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us
Telephone Number (include area code): 952-227-1100
Fax Number (include area code): Fax: 952-227-1110
Minnesota Identification Number:
State of Minnesota vendor number
Federal Employer Identification Number:
In vestigation
12