Loading...
SUM 2004 09 13CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES SEPTEMBER 13, 2004 Mayor Furlong called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. the Pledge to the Flag. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Furlong, Lundquist, and Councilman Peterson COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: Councilman Labatt STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Roger Knutson, Kate Aanenson, Justin Miller, Bob Generous, Paul Oehme, and Todd Hoffman PUBLIC PRESENT FOR ALL ITEMS: Debbie Lloyd PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: 7302 Laredo Drive The meeting was opened with Councilman Ayotte, Councilman Mayor Furlong welcomed everyone to the meeting, both in the audience and at home. There were no formal public announcements. CONSENT AGENDA: Mayor Furlong stated that the following Consent Agenda items will be considered as a single motion and asked if Council members wished to remove any items for further discussion. Items lc and lg were removed from the Consent Agenda and will be discussed immediately following Visitor Presentations. Councilman Ayotte moved, Councilman Lundquist seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager's recommendations: a. Approval of Minutes: - City Council Work Session Minutes dated August 9 & August 23, 2004. - Verbatim & Summary City Council Minutes dated August 9 & August 23, 2004. Receive Commission Minutes: - Summary & Verbatim Planning Commission Minutes dated August 17, 2004. - Summary Park & Recreation Commission Minutes dated August 24, 2004. d. Approve Certificate of Compliance for Arboretum business Park 4 th Addition, Project 00 -11. City Council Meeting Summary Minutes — September 13, 2004 e. Resolution 2004 -62: Accept Public Improvements in Arboretum Business Park 4 Addition, Project 00 -11. h. Approve Release of Tree Preservation Easement, Lots 4 -6, Block 2, Vasserman Ridge 2 " Addition. i. Downtown TIF District: Resolution 2004 -63A: Authorize Application to Extend the Decertification Date. Resolution 2004 -64B: Approve Decertification as of December 31, 2004. j. Resolution 2004 -64: Approve Decertification of Eden Trace TIF District as of December 31, 2004. k. Approval of Quit Claim Deed of Portions of Old Village Hall Plat to the Economic Development Authority. All voted in favor and the motion carried. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS: Mayor Furlong invited anyone in the audience who would like to make comments to come to the podium. Roger Behrens: Mr. Behrens explained that while he had filed as a candidate for the City Council election, after further consideration he had decided to withdraw his name from the ballot. He stated that it was a difficult decision, especially since he had already put some much time and money into the effort, but after discussing it with other people he decided that this was not the time to run for elected office. He thanked all his supporters and especially his wife for their support, and also said that if there was a position available on the planning commission that he would be a good candidate. He still wanted open space dedications required on all future high density housing projects, and distributed to the Council an example of the tax revenues that are generated in a residential project versus an office /industrial project. Dave Wollan, 7303 Frontier Trail: Mr. Wollan spoke regarding the proposed "no parking" signage along Frontier Trail. As someone who works at home, he felt that he had a good idea of the traffic problems along this area, and he did not think that designating this as a "no parking" zone was the correct solution. The overall problem was speeding in the area, and the problem was made worse when the cul -de -sac was opened up and allowed more cut - through traffic to use the street. He thought that not having cars parked along the street would make it more conducive to speeding, and he would hate to have a serious accident there and have to tell the council, "I told you so." Mark Anderson — Lundgren Homes: Mr. Anderson spoke about the proposed final plat for the Oaks of Minnewashta 2 " Addition and was concerned that storm water issues were not being properly addressed. 2 City Council Meeting Summary Minutes — September 13, 2004 Norbert Kerber, 7216 Frontier Trail: Mr. Kerber reiterated what Mr. Wollan stated and feels that the problem is related to speeding and not parking. He stated that Bighorn Drive has become a collector street rather than a residential street. He also noted that there is vegetation along Frontier Trail that blocks sight lines. Mr. Kerber does not feel that parking on the street is a problem. Marty Noll, 7214 Frontier Trail: Ms. Noll stated that she is a stay -at -home mom and was originally upset by neighbors parking on the street until she realized that they were slowing down the traffic. She offered the use of her property for officers to use in conducting speed studies. Ms. Noll feels that the problem along Frontier Trail is speeding rather than parking. Joel Jenkins, 7305 Frontier Trail: Mr. Jenkins stated that the problem along Frontier Trail is speeding and feels the problem stems from when Frontier Trail was extended to through traffic. He feels that it should be allowed as an emergency route only. He stated that he has parked cars on Frontier Trail for the specific purpose of slowing down traffic. He suggests lowering the speed limit to 20 mph or less and then enforcing and giving the neighbors the authority to enforce it. Jeff Williams, Williams Development: Mr. Williams spoke concerning Item lc, the Oaks at Minnewashta and commented on the drainage and ponding issues. He feels that these issues have already been addressed with city staff and introduced his engineer for further clarification. Dan Larson, Loucks Associates: Mr. Loucks stated that he is the civil engineer on the Oaks at Minnewashta project. He stated that he has worked closely with city staff and have met all of the requirements requested by the city. Laura McHale, 7220 Frontier Trail: Ms. McHale stated that she also feels the problem on Frontier Trail is speeding. Additionally, that she appreciates her neighbors parking their vehicles on the street to slow down traffic. OAKS AT MINNEWASHTA 2 ADDITION, FINAL PLAT APPROVAL, AND APPROVE DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AND CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS: Councilman Lundquist asked for clarification about drainage from the back yards. Asst. City Engineer Matt Saam responded that the water would basically drain into an existing wetland and that this is similar to other areas in the city. Councilman Lundquist asked Community Development Director Kate Aanenson if there were any issues with that from an environmental perspective. Aanenson responded that the city modified its wetland setbacks to be consistent with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. This proposal meets all city requirements. It appears that there is disagreement between two private parties concerning additional ponding. Attorney Knutson stated that the city does not enforce private agreements. 3 City Council Meeting Summary Minutes — September 13, 2004 Councilman Lundquist moved and Councilman Peterson seconded to move approval of Item lc -1 & 2 as presented. All voted in favor and the motion carried. CONSIDERATION OF NO PARKING ZONE ON FRONTIER TRAIL: The Mayor thanked residents for bringing their comments forward during Visitor Presentations. City Engineer Oehme stated that both speeding and parking are issues along Frontier Trail. He feels that no parking signs are warranted because of sight -lines along the curve, which is less than the typical standard of 180 ft. at this location. Sgt. Jim Olson concurs with the City Engineer and stated that he would be putting the speed trailer on Frontier Trail for speed monitoring. Councilman Ayotte informed the audience about the study underway to review public safety issues on a holistic level for the city and asked residents to pay attention to upcoming news articles. He felt that this item should be tabled to look at traffic softening measures that can be taken in concert with no parking signs. Councilman Lundquist encouraged residents to be in touch with Sgt. Olson and Beth Hoiseth, the city's Crime Prevention Specialist and to become informed about Project Leadfoot. Most council members agreed that this item should be tabled for further review. Councilman Lundquist commented that he did not feel that tabling the item would help to resolve the real issue. He feels that no parking signs is a Band -Aid approach to correcting traffic issues and the issues with the corner. Councilman Ayotte stated that the city should not table the item without insisting that something be done to mitigate the risk. A motion was made by Councilman Peterson, seconded by Councilman Ayotte to table action on establishing a no parking zone on Frontier Trail. Mayor Furlong, Council members Ayotte and Peterson voted in favor. Councilman Lundquist voted no. Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING ON 2005 MUSA PROJECT 04 -05: Public present: Rick Dorsey 1551 Lyman Blvd., Chanhassen Marc Anderson Lundgren Brothers, Wayzata George Dorsey 1551 Lyman Blvd., Chanhassen Gayle Degler 1630 Lyman Blvd., Chanhassen Mrs. Dean Degler 9111 Audubon Road, Chanhassen Arild Rossavik 8800 Powers Blvd., Chanhassen Bryan Saathoff 2910 Butternut Drive, Chaska Terry Matula 7615 Smetana Lane, Eden Prairie Krista Novack 7615 Smetana Lane, Eden Prairie Larry Martin 2707 Spy Glass, Chaska Connie St. Martin 9231 Audubon Road, Chanhassen Karen Hasse 630 West 96 Street, Chanhassen Mitch & Jill Anderson 2853 Timberview Trail, Chaska Brent Hislop 1851 West Lake Road #550, Chanhassen 4 City Council Meeting Summary Minutes — September 13, 2004 Rich Ragatz Rod & Terrie Cummings Arthur B. Johnson Nathan Franzen David Blanski Sever Peterson Jeff Franz Jim Boyum Jeff Fox Dennis Chadderdon Tim Erhart Eric Theship Rosalis Epic Development 1570 Bluebill Trail, Chanhassen 17448 Frondell Court, Eden Prairie 1841 Lake Drive West, Chanhassen 9350 Great Plains Blvd., Chanhassen Eden Prairie 8950 Sunset Trail, Chanhassen 8805 Sunset Trail, Chanhassen 5270 Howards Point Road, Excelsior 8900 Audubon Road, Chanhassen 9611 Meadowlark Lane, Chanhassen 9201 Audubon Road, Chanhassen Paul Oehme stated that tonight's hearing is to receive comments on the 2005 MUSA Feasibility report. He clarified that it is not an assessment hearing and that no assessments would become pending at this time and that no action was required by the Council this evening. The purpose of the feasibility study is to coordinate a planning effort for future developments in the 2005 MUSA area in a cost effective way for all parties. The feasibility report was developed based upon comments from property owners, best guesses for future development, zoning, city ordinances, and engineering criteria. The city does not intend to initiate any projects at this time, but only to guide the process. The development of this area will be more market - driven, not city- driven. Jon Horn, Kimley Horn & Associates stated that their firm has been working cooperatively with city staff to prepare this feasibility report. Mr. Horn presented a summary of the overall improvements, estimated costs, assessment methodology, and funding. The project is bounded by Lyman Boulevard on the north, future Powers Boulevard on the east, Pioneer Trail on the south, and Audubon Road on the west side. He stated that in December 2003 the City Council approved the AUAR or Alternative Urban Area -wide Review for the MUSA area and in March 2004 the council adopted the Municipal Consent for the TH 212 project. Mr. Horn noted that he and staff met with the property owners in May and June to solicit their input and have met with them individually at other times. He stated that the project includes roadway, watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer improvements. One of the roadway improvements is an east /west roadway that basically runs through the length of the development area, which will be a key component to provide for future development in the area. The other improvements in the project area include Powers Blvd. and Pioneer Trail which were actually included as a part of the TH 212 project. Those improvements would be constructed at such time as the TH 212 project is built and has been included as a part of this feasibility report. Lyman Boulevard will also see improvements. Mr. Horn noted that watermain is proposed to be installed to meet the overall developments in the area. Generally, the watermain along Lyman Blvd., Powers Blvd., Pioneer Trail, and Audubon Road is the infrastructure to meet future development which 5 City Council Meeting Summary Minutes — September 13, 2004 is internal to the MUSA area, and also along that future east /west roadway. The improvements shown are consistent with the city's water system plan and consistent with previous studies that have been adopted by the city. Mr. Horn stated that trunk sanitary sewer also needs to be installed in the area. Basically there are three components of that. A trunk sanitary sewer would be installed in Bluff Creek and Audubon Road to service the development needs in this area and installed between Bluff Creek and Powers Boulevard to meet development needs in that area. Both of those trunk sanitary sewer mains would be fed into an existing lift station at Audubon Road and Lyman Blvd. It's also proposed to install some trunk sanitary sewer south of TH 212, which is actually part of the 2010 MUSA area because of the fact that Powers Blvd. and Pioneer Trail will be built as part of the TH 212 project. Mr. Horn stated that storm sewer improvements were also a part of the project. MnDOT, as a part of the TH 212 project, is proposing to install treatment ponds in these areas. The locations of those treatment ponds are consistent with the recommendations and included as a part of the city's surface water management plan. It is intended to basically piggyback on the MnDOT improvements and expand those ponds for the development in the MUSA area. Generally these ponds treat a bulk of the area, other than the most northwesterly parcel which has to have some of its own treatment facilities because of grades and elevations. Mr. Horn stated that the total estimated cost for all of the improvements comes to just over $16 million. The bulk of that is the roadway improvements at over $10 million, almost $3.3 in trunk watermain, about $1.55 in sanitary sewer, and about $1 million in storm damage costs. He further stated that of the $16.1 million in improvement costs, assessments are about 2 /3rds of that cost, and the city would fund about 1 /3 of that cost. Generally the approach on the assessments was that developers would be responsible for the base costs of the typical improvements and that the city would pay for oversizing costs. As a part of the feasibility report, some standard assessment rates for all the various improvements included within the feasibility report were established. Roadway improvements for the areas that benefit were established at about $14,700 per acre. Separate assessment rates for improvements to the Lyman/Audubon intersection were established at about $860 per acre. Assessments for improvements along Lyman Boulevard are proposed for assistance from the 2005 MUSA area. Other improvements that will be done for specific properties will be paid for by those property owners at cost. Trunk watermain improvements are estimated at about $4,157 per acre; trunk sanitary sewer with one rate for the 2005 MUSA area (which is basically north of TH 212) for about $2,600 per acre and a separate rate for 2010 area because the improvements are different of just over $3,300 per acre; and storm drainage for those properties that benefit at a little over $2,900 per acre. Overall assessments are roughly in the $28,000 to $29,000 per acre area. Mr. Horn stated that they did spend some time with staff comparing these assessments to other communities and felt that they were pretty consistent or similar to other developing communities. Mr. Horn noted that property owners are proposed to be assessed based upon their net property area and not gross property area, which is less any right -of -way dedication, wetlands, or floodplains. Mr. 6 City Council Meeting Summary Minutes — September 13, 2004 Horn stated that assessments would be deferred until development occurs, but that interest would be applied to those assessments until such time as they are paid. However, interest would not accrue for the property owners in the 2010 MUSA area, because those improvements are being installed now just for coordination purposes. Mayor Furlong asked about the timing of the improvement projects. Mr. Horn stated that that was the most common question at the neighborhood meetings. He stated that development would occur and improvements would happen once development drives the need for those improvements. Mayor Furlong also asked how it was determined which properties benefited from the various improvements. Mr. Horn commented that they completed a property -by- property review to determine benefit. Councilman Peterson asked if the information presented this evening was substantially different from the information presented during the Council's last work session. Mr. Horn responded that the information is fairly consistent; however, some slight changes have been made. Mayor Furlong invited members of the public to speak on this issue. Mitch Anderson, 2853 Timberview Trail, Chaska: Mr. Anderson stated that he believes the completion of the east /west connector will force development to occur prematurely. He is also very concerned about the traffic on Audubon Road and particularly at the intersection of the east /west connector at Butternut in Chaska. He is concerned that motorists will use the Autumn Woods neighborhood in Chaska as a shortcut to get to Home Depot, Rainbow, and other businesses on Pioneer Trail, and asked that this area be looked at more closely. He also wanted to clarify whether a signal would be put at the intersection of Audubon and Butternut at some point. Mr. Anderson also recommended that the city re- examine the land uses for the properties in the 2005 MUSA area. Specifically he would like to see land uses shifted in a way that could help mitigate noise, traffic, and other kinds of safety issues. He asked if there would be public discussion on that topic. In response to Mr. Anderson's questions, Mr. Oehme responded that the timing of the signal at Audubon and Butternut is unknown at this time, but would be installed when it is warranted by development. He also added that traffic calming features would be used along this two -lane divided highway to discourage cut - through traffic in the neighborhood. Mr. Oehme added that from a cost effective standpoint, the city would build as much of the east /west roadway as possible at one time. Kate Aanenson responded to Mr. Anderson's question regarding land uses. She stated that the Council had considered guiding this entire area as industrial uses, but felt a good mix of uses is appropriate. Councilman Lundquist asked for clarification about the traffic signal at Audubon and Butternut. Jon Horn explained about signal warrants that need to be met before a signal is installed. The process is basically that once development occurs and traffic generation has been established, signal warrants would be investigated and if signal warrants are 7 City Council Meeting Summary Minutes — September 13, 2004 met, a signal would be considered at that location. He further stated that a signal is ultimately anticipated in this location based on the mix of development guided for this area. Councilman Lundquist asked for clarification on the land use designations and if more public input will be accepted as the properties start to develop. Kate Aanenson responded that when the Comprehensive Plan was developed, it was determined that some properties could see either industrial or multi - family uses. She stated that there is some flexibility and that the Council has the legislative authority to rezone properties. Ms. Aanenson stated that the planners try to communicate with property owners and developers as to what they believe are acceptable uses and that a good mix is coming forward in this area. She also noted that the Planning Commission holds a public hearing on each application and that the Council has final legislative authority. Eric Theship Rosalis, 9201 Audubon Road: Mr. Rosalis requested that the "school area road" be realigned due to impacts to his property based upon the alignment as shown in the feasibility report. Kate Aanenson responded that this road could be developed as either a public or private street and this area was originally looked at as a potential school site. The area is guided for industrial and there are very steep grades in the area. She stated that the alignment of this road is conceptual and will be development driven. Rick Dorsey, 1551 Lyman Boulevard: Mr. Dorsey requested that after all of the information and comments are gathered from this meeting that another meeting be scheduled to review the results. He expressed concern about the timing for construction of the east /west collector road. He feels that it should not be constructed until development is there; and that constructing it too soon will speed up development and make it very expensive for property owners whose property is not in demand. Mr. Dorsey also asked about the timing of the project and whether or not sewer and water improvements will be available at the same time that the road is constructed. He also asked if 30% to complete the design work was a reasonable amount. Paul Oehme stated that the 30% figure included the feasibility study, construction administration, inspections, wetland issues that need resolution, plans and specifications, surveying, and geo- technical information. The 30% figure is a standard construction practice, but could be lower once the project goes out for bid. Mr. Dorsey stated that he understood the city had to contribute $3 million to the construction of TH 212. He asked how this was going to be funded. Mr. Oehme stated that this cost is for widening trails, bridge costs, trails along the corridor, and signal improvements along Lyman and Powers Boulevards. Mr. Oehme stated that these costs will be funded by the city and will not be assessed. There are also two turn -lanes off of Powers Boulevard that will be constructed as well, but the associated costs will be assessed to benefiting property owners. Mr. Dorsey requested that staff re -look at the feasibility report in terms of costs associated with the project and which portions will be assessed. He also asked about the cost effectiveness of the construction, from a taxpayer's perspective. He wants to ensure that road improvements that are installed 8 City Council Meeting Summary Minutes — September 13, 2004 won't be torn up 4 years later for sewer installation. Mr. Dorsey stated that he's willing to pay his fair share, but feels that some people are being assessed for improvements that do not benefit their property. Jon Horn stated that a number of these questions have a lot of background and history and that he would be willing to sit down with Mr. Dorsey and present specific information. Mr. Dorsey also stated that his property is in the Ag Preserve District. As a part of that program, he stated that they are not allowed to develop for at least 8 years after it's taken out of that district, and therefore they cannot be assessed or pay interest on assessments. Mr. Dorsey asked if there are other property owners also in the district, and asked if the city had taken this into account when determining assessments for the properties. He stated that his personal preference for the development of this area would be to move from the source of services, where you add on to it as it develops instead of developing properties prematurely. Paul Oehme stated that Mr. Dorsey raised some valid points and that staff is still looking at the sewer and water issues that he addressed. Specifically, the sewer line on Lyman Boulevard would not be put in at this time. It parallels Lyman Boulevard and does benefit Mr. Dorsey's property, but installation is all about timing and when development is going to occur. Arild Rossavik, 8800 Powers Blvd: Mr. Rossavik stated that the city installed a lift station in his area back in 1993 or 1994, and this $250,000 investment has been sitting unused ever since because the land use guide does not allow him feasible access to the property. He asked if the Council will consider land use changes for Hillside Oaks Addition with the upcoming construction of Highway 212. He also stated that he has a request in to the Planning Commission regarding this issue. Mayor Furlong stated that his question may or may not refer to the 2005 MUSA area that is being discussed tonight. He further stated that this type of request has to go through the typical planning process. John Chadwick, 11430 Zion Circle, Bloomington, MN, Representing Sever Peterson: Mr. Chadwick stated that he has been involved in the development of farmland in Blooming, Savage, and Shakopee. Mr. Peterson asked him to speak from personal experience and he stated that the public process has been a good one. He feels that looking at the project as a whole is better than piece -meal and he complimented the city for the public process. Larry Martin, 2707 Spyglass Drive, Chaska, Representing Jeff Fox and the Fox Family: Mr. Martin stated that he also appreciated the process the city has taken for this project area. He stated that there really have not been any surprises as far as assessments are concerned. He asked what tonight's meeting means in terms of a firm policy. He heard earlier tonight that development proposals will have some flexibility in the improvements because they will be development- driven. Mr. Martin would like more information on the assessment policy. Paul Oehme discussed the east /west collector roadway and explained that there will be two connection points, one on Powers Blvd. and one on Audubon Road that are fixed, and that there is not much flexibility in terms of where the 9 City Council Meeting Summary Minutes — September 13, 2004 road can go. He further stated that the city will work with property owners in terms of locations for sewer and water installation in order to minimize costs and destruction to wetlands. Mr. Oehme stated that the city is struggling in how to pay for our share of the county infrastructure costs, and assessment is one mechanism that has been considered. It would not be the entire cost, but a portion that staff feels is appropriate at the time. Mayor Furlong added that a special assessment hearing is held any time the city considers levying assessments. Gayle Degler, 1630 Lyman Boulevard: Mr. Degler stated that he was comforted to hear that this whole area will be development- driven and not forced development. He asked what the definition was of an assessment acre. Mr. Oehme stated that this project is somewhat unique in its scope and the assessment acre is a methodology that has been used in the past for assessments of utilities and infrastructure. He added that in terms of benefit to development properties and development acres, its the methodology that staff and our consultant deemed most appropriate in this area to show benefit to the property owners and come up with a consistent assessment practice for these improvements and how to relate them back to the property. Kate Aanenson added that "buildable property" would be another term for it. Tim Erhart, 9611 Meadowlark Lane: Mr. Erhart asked why the land that the State of Minnesota's owns is not calculated in the assessments because it will get sold eventually to potential developers. Mr. Oehme stated that these properties are being considered for ponding sites and are not developable /buildable at this time. It is also difficult to show benefit to MnDOT. Roger Knutson added that you cannot assess the State of Minnesota unless they volunteer to be assessed. Mr. Erhart also stated that the city should consider deleting the wetlands and ponds from the total area when assessments are calculated. Kate Aanenson responded that these areas are removed as well as any unbuildable property. The public hearing was closed. The Council thanked the citizens for their input and appreciated the civility in which items were presented. They appreciated hearing the comments and believe that staff and our consultant and residents have done a good job working collectively on this project. Councilman Lundquist reminded residents to also contact their County Commissioner when it comes funding issues for Lyman Boulevard. The Council took a five- minute recess at this point. Mayor Furlong: I call this meeting back to order and we'll move on with the next item on our agenda. 10 City Council Meeting Summary Minutes — September 13, 2004 2005 BUDGET: APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY TAX LEVY AND SET DATE FOR TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARING Bruce DeJong stated that tonight's action will be setting the preliminary 2005 levy, which will be used by Carver County for the Truth in Taxation notices. He noted that through the hard work of the Council and staff that residents should see a 3 -4% reduction in their city taxes, even with increases in the general fund and contractual services. Mr. DeJong noted that once this levy amount cannot be increased after it has been set. He asked that the Council adopt the tax levy at $9,462,666. Council members were pleased that residents would see a reduction in their taxes for next year and complimented staff and fellow Council members for their efforts. Councilman Peterson noted that it's important to note that this decrease is being presented without any kind of service reductions. Councilman Ayotte commented that he is pleased that public safety issues will be addressed. Resolution No. 2004 -65: A motion was made by Councilman Ayotte, seconded by Councilman Peterson, approving the Preliminary Tax Levy for the 2005 Budget and setting the date for the Truth in Taxation Hearing for Monday, December 6, 2004 at 7:00 p.m. All voted in favor and the motion carried. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS Councilman Ayotte noted that the anniversary of 9/11 was last Saturday and wished to thank the military and public safety personnel for their work. He also noted that his daughter is now serving in the military. Councilman Lundquist encouraged everyone to vote in the Primary Election tomorrow. The polls are open from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. Mayor Furlong noted that the Dave Huffman Memorial Race was last Saturday and it was well attended. He noted that Mrs. Kathy Huffman and her two children were there and that they live in Illinois now. He thanked the organizers of the event and the corporate sponsors. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS Todd Gerhardt asked the Council for feedback on the joint meetings with the commissions. He noted that the Park & Recreation Commission and Senior Commission meetings were coming up at the next meeting and asked if the Council had any specific questions they would like addressed. Council members thought the process worked well as is. Mr. Gerhardt also noted that Department Heads will be presenting their budget presentations in October and early November and thanked everyone for their hard work on the 2005 proposed levy. 11 City Council Meeting Summary Minutes — September 13, 2004 CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Mayor Furlong thanked city staff for attending the advisory committee meeting on the potential TH 41 river crossing. He added he appreciated the city's interests being well represented. Councilman Lundquist moved, Mayor Furlong seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried. The City Council meeting was adjourned at 9:50 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Karen Engelhardt 12