The URL can be used to link to this page

4 Sand Companies Concept PUD CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone 952.227.1100 Fax 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone 952.227.1180 Fax 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site \WNI. ci .chanhassen. mn .us ~ ~~ MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director DATE: January 12, 2005 rIo/ SUBJ: Sand Companies, Inc. Concept PUD Planning Case 05-01 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The applicant is requesting Concept Planned Unit Development Approval for a mixed use development. ACTION REQUIRED City Council approval requires a majority of the City Council present. PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY The Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 4,2005 on the subject site. The Commission recommended 5-0 approval of the conceptual PUD. The major area that still needs to be addressed between conceptual and preliminary is access off of Lake Susan Drive and to the Klingelhutz property. RECOMMENDA TION The Planning Commission and staff recommend adoption of the motion as specified on page 8 of the staff report. ATTACHMENTS 1. Planning Commission Staff Report dated January 4, 2005. 2. Planning Commission Minutes dated January 4,2005. 3. Letter from MnDOT dated January 10,2005. 4. Site Plan. g:\plan\2005 planning cases\05-0 1 sand companies concept pud - 10 1 & lyman\executive summary. doc The City of Chanhassen . A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a chanming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. ...... PC DATE: 1/4/05 2 -JI CC DATE: 1/24/05 CITY OF CHANHASSEN REVIEW DEADLINE: 1/31/05 CASE #: 05-01 BY: Aanenson, K -........ ........ ~ Z -< U ~ ~ ~ ~ -< -< ~ -< ~ ~ ~ ~ 00. STAFF REPORT PROPOSAL: Conceptual PUD of 24 acres for commercial, office and multi-family development. LOCATION: Northwest comer of Lyman Boulevard and realigned TH 101. APPLICANT: Sand Companies, Inc. 366 South 1 oth Avenue. Waite Park, MN 56387 320-202-3100 PRESENT ZONING: RSF, Residential Single Family 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Mixed Use-Neighborhood Commercial or High Density Residential ACREAGE: 24 acres gross DENSITY: Residential portion of development Parcels 3 & 4 5.98 acres 11.54 units/acre Parcels 1 & 5 6.11 acres 11.95 units/acre SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Requesting Concept Planned Unit Development Approval for a mixed use development. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving a rezoning because the City is acting in its legislative or policy making capacity. A rezoning must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Sand Companies, Inc. Concept PUD Planning Case No. 05-01 January 4,2005 Page 2 018 SUMMARY Sand Companies, Inc. is requesting concept PUD review for approximately 24 acres of land. This site is in the current Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). While utilities are available to the site it has not been developed because of the proposed improvements in conjunction with Highways 212, 101 and Lyman Boulevard. Scheduled improvements on these roads will not be completed until 2007 so it is unlikely that development will begin before then. Conceptual review of the property allows the developer to close on the purchase of the property and work with MnDot, the County and the City on the infrastructure improvements. The property is currently zoned RSF, Residential Single Family it is guided Mixed Use. The comprehensive plan states "the plan designates areas around the proposed TH lO1/TH 212 interchanges as mixed use. This category has been established to accommodate either commercial or high-density residential developments. This area is in the current MUSA. The commercial use is intended to support or compliment the high-density development. If the city is to be developed commercially it shall be a business neighborhood commercial zoning district." State law states that the zoning and the land use designation be consistent. The land use designation is the official control. Therefore, a rezoning to a mixed-use PUD would be consistent with the land use. Staff is recommending approval of the concept PUD. BACKGROUND The subject site was given the mixed-use land use designation in the 1991 Comprehensive Plan update because of its proximity to the proposed 212/312 interchange at Highway 101. The land use designation of mixed use allows residential of 8-16 units per acre and neighborhood business district (see attached zoning standards). Southwest Metro Transit was recently rezoned to a similar mixed-use PUD. Under the next level of review the PUD design standards will be drafted to deal with the development standards. These standards will include architecture, height, setback, landscaping, buffering, signage, lighting, parking and permitted uses (see attached Ordinance No. 379). The intersection of Lyman Boulevard and State Highway 101 will be realigned with the improvements to Highway 212/312. These improvements are not scheduled to be completed until 2007. Development of this site will have to coordinate with these improvements. The applicant has met with the Planning Commission informally at two separate work sessions. The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on December 16,2004. The purpose of the concept review is to gi ve further direction to the applicant as the development plan proceeds forward for conceptual review. Following is the requirements for conceptual PUD review. Sand Companies, Inc. Concept PUD Planning Case No. 05-01 January 4, 2005 Page 3 018 J:li.\.ud Use . - ,;,J/;> ..:.'.It!'. ,,:'î'(/ o;¡.:/...::...., ¡-...-.\ ,;;(.0 " ~ A~J' f _. _J' .-----.........., .I..~' {t' .................. ,£,/, -1- .---------,"........ v~ ~ 'PI/') , /:=-:'f. ! /~____ ,~ .._,1-----..... /J \., n_" Concept PUD - What is required? The intent of the concept plan is to get direction from the Planning Commission and City Council without incurring a lot of expense. There will be a greater level of detail required through the city code and the conditions of approval in this report. Following are the requirements for conceptual PUD approval. Sec. 20~517 General concept plan. Chanhassen City Code (a) The general concept plan for a PUD provides an opportunity for the applicant to submit a plan to the city showing the basic intent and the general nature of the entire development without incurring substantial cost. The plan shall include the following: (1) Overall gross and net density. (2) Identification of each lot size and lot width. (3) General location of major streets and pedestrian ways. (4) General location and extent of public and common open space. (5) General location and type of land uses and intensities of development. (6) Staging and time schedule for development. (b) The tentative written consent of all property owners within the proposed PUD shall be filed with the city before the staff commences review. Approval of the concept statement shall not Sand Companies, Inc. Concept PUD Planning Case No. 05-01 January 4,2005 Page 4018 obligate the city to approve the final plan or any part thereof or to rezone the property to a planned unit development district. (c) The final acceptance of land uses is subject to the following procedures: (1) The developer meets with the city staff to discuss the proposed developments. (2) The applicant shall file the concept stage application and concept plan, together with all supporting data. (3) The planning commission shall conduct a hearing and report its findings and make recommendations to the city council. Notice of the hearing shall consist of a legal property description, description of request, and be published in the official newspaper at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing, written notification of the hearing shall be mailed at least ten (10) days prior thereto to owners of land within five hundred (500) feet of the boundary of the property and an on-site notification sign erected. (4) Following the receipt of the report and recommendations from the planning commission, the city council shall consider the proposal. If the planning commission fails to make a report within sixty (60) days after receipt of the application, then the city council may proceed without the report. The council may approve the concept plan and attach such conditions, as it deems reasonable. Approval shall require a four-fifths vote of the entire council. ANAL YSIS The subject site is divided into 4 development parcels. Parcels 1 and 5 include the area north of the proposed Highway 212 interchange. This area is residential and proposes townhouses north of the extension of Lake Susan Drive and townhouses and an apartment building between the new Highway 212 and Lake Susan Drive. Density as proposed is just under 12 units per acre. Parcel 4 includes a 3-story apartment building with 69 units. This development is also just under 12 units per acre. Parcel 3 or the rest of the site is proposed for commercial and office development. The southern portion of Parcel 3 is adjacent to residential development. Commercial development is not recommended in this area. The plan proposes a single-story office building, Staff believes that this provides a good buffer to the residential uses. The PUD ordinance also requires a 50-foot buffer from the change in uses that are separated by a roadway. The restriction of uses and their location will be specified in the PUD. In addition, no drive- throughs will be permitted except for banks (see attached Land Use Detail Map). Following are conceptual comments that the various city departments have offered that need to be incorporated into the next submittal: Engineering . The extension of Lake Susan Drive, from its current terminus to the intersection of new highway 101, will be required for development of and access to parcels 1 and 5. . The proposed driveway access locations off of Lake Susan Drive for parcels 1 and 5 must either be in the same location or meet minimum offset requirements of the City and/or County. Sand Companies, Inc. Concept PUD Planning Case No. 05-01 January 4, 2005 Page 5 018 The applicant should be aware that current MnlDOT plans for the TH 212 improvements show a median in Lake Susan Drive, in front of the proposed access location to parcelS. This would limit the access to a right-in/right-out only. Additionally, staff is recommending that access to parcelS be considered to come from a combined access with the property to the north, not off of Lake Susan Drive. · The locations of the internal public roadway which will serve parcels 3 and 4 will be reviewed in detail at the preliminary plat phase. The roadway will need to meet all current design requirements for City streets including: minimum width, alignment, and curve radii requirements. The location of the south intersection of the new road at Lyman Boulevard will need to be re-Iocated to the east so that it's over the existing sewer and water lines. · Parcels 3 and 4 may be subject to future traffic signal and turn lane assessments for the benefit of the improvements to new highway 10 1. · A temporary easement for trail construction will be required along the north side of Lyman Boulevard. · The right-of-way for old highway 101, between Lyman and Lake Susan Drive, will need to be vacated prior to any final plat recording for this site. · Public utility easements will be required over the existing sanitary sewer and water lines that go through the site. · The development will be required to meet existing site runoff rates for the 10- and 100-year storms. Wetlands Existing Wetlands One ag/urban wetland exists on-site. The wetland has not been delineated. A wetland delineation must be submitted prior to submittal of a development plan. Wetland buffer widths of 16.5 feet must be maintained around all wetlands on-site. All structures must maintain a 40-foot setback from wetland buffer edges. Wetland buffer areas should be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant must install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. Storm Water And Erosion Control Storm Water Management The Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District is proposing a regional storm water pond in the southwest corner of Parcels 3 and 4 as part of their Lake Riley Basic Water Management Plan. In addition, the City will be locating a trail on the north side of Lyman Boulevard. The applicant should work with the agencies to accommodate the necessary improvements. Sand Companies, Inc. Concept PUD Planning Case No. 05-01 January 4, 2005 Page 6018 Erosion Control Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Steeper than 3: 1 10:1 to 3:1 Flatter than 10: 1 Time 7 days 14 days 21 days (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area is not actively being worked.) These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as-needed. Surface Water Management Fees Surface Water Management fees will be calculated when the precise breakdown of land uses is solidified and must be paid to the City prior to final plat recording. (These fees range from approximately $3,800 to approximately $14,000 per acre based on development type.) Other Agencies The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase IT Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering), Army Corps of Engineers) and comply with their conditions of approval. Landscaping Landscaping requirements can be broken down into the following areas: Parking lots: All parking lots will require landscaping within and at the perimeter of the lots. Landscaped islands and peninsulas will be required in any lot over 6,000 square feet in size. All landscape islands are required to have a minimum inside width of 10 feet. Buildings: All buildings will be required to have foundation plantings. Residential areas will be required to meet subdivision tree preservation and reforestation requirements. Streets: Boulevard tree plantings are required along any collector roads, such as Lake Susan Drive. Sand Companies, Inc. Concept PUD Planning Case No. 05-01 January 4,2005 Page 7018 Bufferyards: Bufferyard plantings will be required between parcels with different land uses, along streets and on the property of any office, mixed use, or commercial properties. A bufferyard planting will be required along the property line abutting the Chanhassen Hills neighborhood. Other: The city promotes the planting of native species. Groupings of shade trees and shrubs along natural areas, such as wetlands, are recommended as well as in areas such as the tot lot or the common areas between townhomes. Staff also recommends an interior streetscape of boulevard trees, Park Parcels #1 & #5 - Proposed 73 units of apartment homes and townhomes Comprehensive Park Plan This site lies within the park service area (1/2 mile) of Chanhassen Hills Park. Convenient access to the park will be available via a south trail route or on-street along Lake Susan Drive. Full park fees shall be collected in lieu of parkland dedication at the rate in force at the time of final plat. Comprehensive Trail Plan A section of the City's comprehensive trail plan currently exists on the west side of Highway 101 at this location. This trail section needs to be maintained in its entirety. The future construction of Highway 212 will terminate the existing trail at the highway's north right-of-way line. However, a new trail connector along the northern edge of the new highway leading to the southern outlet of Lake Susan Drive and to Chanhassen Hills Park will be constructed. Sidewalks connecting the various buildings to the nearby trail system should be included in the plan. Parcels #3 & #4 - Proposed 69 units of apartment homes and neighborhood business Comprehensive Park Plan This site also lies within the park service area of Chanhassen Hills Park. Residents of the apartment building will utilize a trail connector over new Highway 212 to access the park. Full park fees shall be collected in lieu of parkland dedication at the rate in force at the time of final plat. Comprehensive Trail Plan New trails along the north side of Lyman Boulevard and east side of new Highway 101 south are being planned for construction as a part of the Highway 212 project. Appropriate sidewalk connections to both of these trails should be included in the project plans. Building Comments None at this time. Sand Companies, Inc. Concept PUD Planning Case No. 05-01 January 4, 2005 Page 80f8 Fire Marshal Comments None at this time. Housing A part of the city's comprehensive plan deals with housing goals and policies. The city does participate in the Livable Communities Act and has goals for housing diversity and affordability. Because of the location of this site in close proximity to mass transit, staff is recommending that some of the housing be considered for "affordable housing." The city is lacking most in affordable rental housing but consideration should be give to both housing types. RECOMMENDA TION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of City Council approve the concept PUD with the recommendations as outlined in the staff report. ATTACHMENTS 1. Submittal1etter and application. 2. Public Hearing Notice and Property Owners List. 3. Notice of Neighborhood Meeting dated December 8, 2004. 3. Zoning Distlicts R-16 and BN. 4. Ordinance No. 379. 5. Land Use Detail Map. 6. Site Plan. g:\plan\2005 planning cases\05-01 sand companies concept pud -101 & lyman\staffreport 1-4-05 revised.doc 1~1'1¡~~mwr.~11r¡\t:::;~'\'lii¡>¡'1':p,¡'I¡¡I.~~~'m;-~.rfíWI~~:1K1'~~;~.\,,'<¡'1<"\""':rr;;'~. J1,!n.~,...,.71~'~~¡"iPr.I'!~~~?,!I~i')~f"":'1'r~~_~!tA,~.~.. City of Chanhassen Planning Commission 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 DEC 2 2004 .~ SCI Sand Companies, Inc. 366 South Tenth Avenue PO Box 727 Waite Park, MN 56387-0727 Office: (320) 202-3100 Fax: (320) 202-3139 E-mail: SCI@SandCompanies.com Website: www.SandCompanies.com December 1, 2004 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT Re: General Concept Plan Review Sand Companies, Inc. Development (Curry Property) Dear Commission Members; In accordance with Sec. 20-517. General Concept Plan, we are making submission of drawings and supporting information for the property generally known as Curry Property, but defined as Parcels #1 and #5 north of the proposed Highway #212 and Highway #101 intersection and Parcels #3 and #4 south of the same intersection. We provide the following information in answer to the 6 information request made: . (I) Approximate building areas, pedestrian ways and road locations; See Sheet A-O.l for proposed layout of the north sites. Parcel #5 is to be devoted to two story townhouse buildings with double garages. Parcel #1 is to support development of 16 townhomes and 51 apartment homes in a three story building over a basement parking garage. On site vehicle traffic will be on private drives, and pedestrians will be accommodated with internal sidewalks connecting to walks along Lake Susan Drive. See sheet A-O.2 for the proposed layout of the south site. Parcel #4, with it large wetland area, will serve as the site for a three story building with 69 apartment homes over a basement parking garage. Parcel #3 will be developed for Neighborhood Business uses including service type offices, financial institutions, convenience store with gas pumps, and some neighborhood retails shops such as submarine shops, optical shops, pizza stores etc. Vehicular traffic is organized along a public street connecting between proposed intersection of Highway #101 and the on-off ramp to #212, and intersection of Lyman Boulevardatthe,-éxisting Highway #101 location, We propose an internal sidewalk along one side of this internal street. (2) Height, bulk and square footage of buildings; As noted on the plans, the apartment buildings are three story over parking garages, mostly below grade. The apartment buildings are 10 feet floor to floor, so third floor is 20 feet above grade, with the building eave height at about 29 feet. Because we prefer fairly step roof pitches, we would expect total peak heights to approach 45 feet to the roof ridge, or 37 feet to average roof height. The townhomes are two story, with eave heights at about 18 feet and roof ridge heights in the range of30 feet. The commercial buildings will all be limited to one story, and to the extent we can control the individual building designs we would expect use of sloped roofs with eaves heights in the range of 10-14 feet and ridges in the range of24 to 36 feet. P:\SCI - Const. & Dev. Div\Chanhassen Land Development #04-300\Architecture\Site Related\PlanningCommission120104.doc Construction . Property Management . Development Equal Opportunity Employer 8CANNED (3) Type, number or square footage or intensities of specific land use; Parcels # 1 and #5 on the north will be used for multiple residential use. A total of 7 buildings is proposed. The sites total 6.11 acres after additional right-of-way is taken for highway development, resulting in a density of 11.95 units per acre. Parcel #4 on the south will also be multiple residential with a density of 11.54 units per acre. At Parcel #3, actual building sizes will be largely dictated by setbacks and parking requirements. The drawing on Sheet A-0.2 shows a total of 41, 500 sq. of building, but his is just to represent on possible approach to the development of these building sites. In some cases, somewhat larger buildings could be developed (financial institution) without burdening the site parking ability. (4) Number of dwelling units; A total of 142líving units is proposed. (5) Generalized development plan showing areas to be developed or preserved; Sheets A-O.l and A-0.2 show the extent of development. Areas have been established for water retention ponds, although no detailed design analysis has been completed. The significant wetland on parcel #4 will be retained, and there is current interest on the part of watershed district in utilizing some portion of Parcel #4 as part of a larger area water treatment system. We plan to cooperate in that effort, (6) Staging and timing of development; Both the massive highway construction process and market forces will control development of these parcels. It would be our goal to have building construction activity underway on parcels #1 and #5 during the summer of 2005. We expect little commercial demand for Parcel #3 until highway traffic on #101 is in place, so construction starts there are more likely to be very late 2005 or into 2006. Sand Companies, Inc, plans to conduct a neighborhood information meeting rrom 7:00 to 9:00 PM on December 15 at the Chanhassen Country Inn and Suites. Notices will be mailed to all resideI1ts gfrer-ord ~thin 500 feet of the property this week. Beyond the II" x 17" site drawings we have prepared a large site drawing over an aerial photo that illustrates the relationship between our proposed development, the highway system and existing neighborhoods. We hope this is helpful to area residents and Planning Commission members alike. Sincerely, , ............ c~ 8andr~~ ~hard A. Hennings, AIA Senior Architect ~ P:ISC] - Const & Dev. Div\Chanhassen Land Development #04-300\ArchitecturelSite RelatedlPlanningCommissionI20]04.doc o~ -0 I CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED DEC 2 2004 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT APPLICANT: Sand Companies, Inc. OWNER: Sand Companies, Inc. ADDRESS: 366 SlOth Ave ADDRESS: 366 S 10th Ave Waite Park MN 56387 Waite Park MN 56387 TELEPHONE (Day Time) 320-202-3100 TELEPHONE: 320-202-3100 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Temporary Sales Permit Conditional Use Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements Interim Use Permit Variance Non-confonning Use Permit Wetland Alteration Pennit .¡ Planned Unit Development· Zoning Appeal Rezoning Zoning Ordinance Amendment Sign Permits Sign Plan Review .¡ Notification Sign Site Plan Review· X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost·· - $50 CUP/SPRIVACNÁf~IWAPfMetes & Bounds - $400 Minor SUB Subdivision· TOTAL FEE $ 925.00 Mailing labels of all property owners within at least 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must be included with the application -OR- the City can provide this list (Carver County properties only) for an additional fee to be invoiced to the applicant. If you would like the City to provide mailing labels, check this box 0 In possesion Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. "'Twenty-six (26) full-size folded COpili!S of the plans must be submitted, including an 8%" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet. "''''Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. SCANNED PROJECT NAME: Sand Companies Development, Chanhassen MN LOCATION: Northwest & Southwest corners of intersection of Highway 212 & 101 LEGAL DESCRI PTlON: See attached ALT A Survey for parcel descriptions. TOTAL ACREAGE: 21.77 WETLANDS PRESENT: PRESENT ZONING: RSF REQUESTED ZONING: PUD .¡ YES NO PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: Mixed use REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: Mixed use REASON FOR REQUEST: To allow development ofthe various sites in conformance with the guided uses. This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application, A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of OWner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study.-The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. fl~/1- S~F.~ñ.r ~ Application Received on ¡,.,). J d-- J 0 Lf ¡;{.ò{. 0 <¡- Date lb 9 _00 Fee Paid ;:1:;, - I ~ £1.1/ ¡J Y Receipt No. The applicant should contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Thursday prior to the meeting. If not contacted, a copy of the report will be mailed to the applicant's address. CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDA VIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) SS. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on December 23, 2004, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notìce of Public Hearing for Concept PUD, Sand Companies, Inc. - Planning Case No. 05-01 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Karen J. Engelhardt, Deputy Clerk Subscribed and sworn to before me this _ day of , 2004. Notary Public 0) I: ;:: () CD :ãE I: 0)0 I: .- .¡: U) CU.~ () E :I:E ~2 0 ~o æg> .- õl: I: (1) CO (,)- ~D. o I: Za> tJ) tJ) CO .r:: I: CO J: o e') I: ~ a> a> :ãE I: 0)0- c'- ._ tJ) }.. tJ) ca·- () E :I:E (.) 0 .;CO :Je') D. .~ -I: 0t: 'C1)CU (,)- .- D. .. o C z~ U) CO .r:: I: ca .r:: o <D"8~ .c0- +->..c:-o <D +-> .... ro .c ::I0<D +-> o.e_ .... c: "'0 ~ ~= .Eo æ ::I"ij)3:: _ 0 c:_~ .......c:c: "'0 >-<Dro ,-,<D<D > E..c:.c >EE ã:i CIi....+->O ã:i 0. a. .2 0 E (1) _00 c: 'Eo.c(/) ~ ã) ã) E g.- ~ - g- . .... > > ...... 0 _ ,...;,_ Ero<D<D ..... '~-::Ic'(/) . :::2: 0"'0 :;: £ (/) o.~ 0> ~ 0 :!::: ~ £ 0 õ -;,.~ æ-~ ~ R :5 ~ 0.Q) (¡; $ .§.~ E O~ f'... 'u c: ..::: cu ~ _ _ f'-. "'0 -+¡- 0 .... ..- II) Q) .e (1). (5 ro <ñ ~E 0. 8~5:..c: o£- LOwc:::I- _ '-OOo>Q) o .e ro EO(/) >-.~ = - c:.c o E-a....... (/) Q) CUO).e"'Oï:::- C\I ..... Q) ,,: ~ ~ '- ::I c: ::I.c ro_c:.... c..c:..c:O)o.cuoO> ..,f'.c 0. cu ~ - t 0>£ (/) _ ::I 2:'0 Q) Q) ~ 0 I I::ë (/) .+_d~ ... '" g,g C\IC\I ~ c: 0 - Q) o.c ::I c: ...... c: Q) Q).- 0 O'.~..... C:::IOõ=- cu:Sc:c.Q)~ec' ro 0 .... -: 2 0. c: ,9 co (/) a. ï::: J () o.~ cu E 0 -;;; Eo_(/) (/) ro ~ -oE . = - .... ._ 0 Q) I: c: :.c roro(/)Q)x ()~.....!2:;cu_..c: -oIQ)Eo +-><D-o.o-o (/) ::I ......-"'Oro....co =::1= Q) >'O'E 0.9 c: o::lg Q) o.o.e ::I :!::: Q) 0 0. LO ro 0 "5 - _Co .o..c::l I- () a: ° ro 0 CJ) ....J _ct r-" ~ cU' a. Qi E ¡::c: _", .S! .....- $ ri ,CtJ 0 0-1 ~ ü:_ C)c c ctJ .- 0 c .- c- ctJo. _C" D..« >.c 1:: 0 Q)+:: C"ctJ o ° ... 0 D....J - ctJ II) o c.. o ... D.. "OQ) Q)o..c: ..c:O- +->..c:-o Q) -....ro :S g.8~ .... c: "0 ~ ~= .E 0 æ::l '0; ~ .......~ . OCÞ:: .c:c: "'0 >-Q)CIJ "'OQ)Q) > E..c:..c: ~EE ã:i CIi....-O ca a. 0. c:.2.E E Q) ã5 ..Q ..Q ro -,e; oc.c en· . t .~ ~ E g.- ~.--: g. E"'Q).Q) >. I/),g....o>- 0. _ >. >. _0::: ';:,~ ã5 c: o 0 ,- = t . 0;:::' Q) 'S o 0 c:E Q) - 0).... c: E > .. f'-. :::>, 0. Q)"C ';::: .- 0 f'-.f'-...,....Eo c: ··-roCU - '-'. .......-11) Q):!5 Q)ë5 (¡j - Q).- 0. 0 0 O)..c: o..c:_ ~ c: '§ ~ ,.... "~ 0' ~ Q) 2~æEo en>-~=,gc:..c: 0C\l E a..-..,... enQ) Q) ro'O) .e "0 .;::: - ..... 0 ~ .~ ... ::I C:::I..c: ro _ c:.... c: ..c:..c:0) 0. ro 0 0> ..q- J::: a. CU 0 - t .9£ en .... ::I >. () Q) Q) ro en- 0 Ie ..c:·-en .,..; e ...._ooC\l ~ Q) .... -." c:o = C\I Q).... .0....· 0 J::: w.... _ __ Q)"O II) _ ::IQ) - ::I c: () 0...... c:. Q) ,- 0 O"~ 0> C:::I '+-=- ro:Sc:c.Q)Q)ec: ro 0 .... -: Q) 0.0> co (¡ .... 0.'- J 0 .E .~ (¡j E c: = E 0 en (ü ...: __ ° E 0 0 CU ~ 0.:¡....!Q (l) ............... ",oQ)-....c:..c: ro ro (/) Q) 'x 0 Q) .....!2 ::I ro _ ..c: -g I ~ E e ..- "'0 (¡j ~ ':ü o.,g "S .2 Q) >. O"E 0.9 c: 0::1 g Q) o.o.c ~ ð æ 8 fij- 2 ð5 .3 :2:;;C ¡:: fij--g ð. Qi E ¡::c: _'" .S! .....- $3 ctJ 0 0-1 ~ ü:_ mc c ctJ .- 0 C·- c- ctJc.. _C" D..« >.c 1::0 Q)+:: C"ctJ 0° ...0 D..-I ctJ II) o c.. o ... D.. "5 .sQ) en c.. 0 0> Q) ..c: (l) 0 .e"'(/)- en t) cu'-oOQ) en "-0-"'0 ....: ::I Q):- ~ ~..c: Ei:';; ° ~ ~EoC\lOoo Q) '6~' å. Q) ':' goo. '8 ri c: Q. 0 E C\I >- (l) = a. _~ 0 - M 0 LO _ C:'S -oe ëñ o>..enO>-o> Q)en 0. ..!Q .~..q 0 (¡j . Q) ~ o ~o- (/»cu OQ)=E Qj-.;,,:::C:::Iro- 0...I:::.e E E E· ëü 0 ¿ ..c: W 0....::10 ....enE .... c: 0.0 . c: O. 0.0Q) ~ro,gQ)¿':::O> Q) (/)..c: Q) - 0 .c c: Q) .2 .~ :S æ Ë :S ~ ~ .!Q ~ ~ .Q. ã5 Õ ã. 0 -g-,,2 0:: ~ Q) ro ~ ~ ~-~ro (l)~::I(¡j-§(/) Q) c: "'0 .e ::I g, ~ ro'- Q) __Q)Q)"'O eno ......c::!:::£,.= ê: (/) > Q) c:..c::=: ° 0 _ _ .... Q) ~.- ¡g ~ Q) . ~ -~ .$ 0 0 >0.Q)- o.o>-c:,gC:Q)ëñ o=go Q):+::roO~Q)O(/) ~ -- .... (/) '+- "0 0 E C:'- ....::> ,- ..c: 0 ,- c: ... E ro'::!D~ - ....Q)0E'U ~ -....., Q) 0> LL (/) (/) > E ~ S ro £ Q) ,~ ..c: ro c: 0"0 0 <U(/).....,..;(/)....O>Q)Q)ocuü 0>.2 æ 0 ::1::1 ã. c: c:c: _ a. c:Q) ..c: Q) ,g"'O 0 ro Q)'- Q) -- -~ -.... - ro - - ..c: ~9-Eoeëëü..c:õ~t:c:- _Q)O '+- Q) E .e ::> >- ·~'Cü > E - ~..c:o::lQ);>>-cueE:!:::ten WI-Oa..£::I:!:::"Oo. EroQ) o 0 c: (/) ø.c o.'õ. >-.>- 0 -- .... ::I Q) 0 C\lct)..t :=:.e:::2:£O(/)"Oo II)C) 53.= c..- c..Q) ctJ Q) ::I::äE - Q) m"c "c- ;:1â ~ II)~ C C OQ) +::E mE ::JO 00 "5 ,gQ) en a. 00> Q)..c: o .eM en- Q) t) ro'-OOQ) ~ "-0-"0 ::s Q):- ~ ~..c: Ei:';; t5 ° ~EoC\lOoO Q) en Q) ·Q)C\I::so.... ..,... _0. '0 a. '0' .,..; .;:: 0. 0 E C\I >- Q) = 0. .g c:o - M 0 !:Q _ c: 'S O>..en""-o;> "0 e ëñ .~..q 0 (¡j . Q) ~ Q)en a. . ,!Q ã5 0 - (/) > cu o Q),g E Q)+-:~ 6 =!..c:roêi5 .œ..c:.cE EEro(/)c:' o-::so ·+->c:Eo. 0. c: o.ü ~ ro ,g Q) ¿.:::o> o Q) +-> 0..c: c: Q) ::s .~ Q)en.cQ) 0 ro(/)-_ ..c: c: - ..c: ~.. .!Q <:( en.Q. Q) +->roE- oco~Q)roQ)Q) õã.o"O (j) u>::s+->..c:..c: E ::>__....s .e....oroc:enQ) ;> 'u ::s ~ ro'- .~ ~"OQ)"O (/) 0 >'_J::::!:::£ > (/) Q) c:..c::=: ° 0 -_ c: ..... Q) > ro Q)CU'~ (/)0 0 .~ Ci'O; .Q D..,g ~ "Eo ,g ë Q) ëñ o 00 Q)_ .... Q) 0 E ro E ro _ ~ 0> Q) O>LL en en > E Q)c:roC: Q).~..c:cuffi°"oo > ro. .... ---" en !::; 0> Q) i- 0 ro Ü 'Õ¡ .2 -E -;;j -0 ,g i5 g D.. êa ~ _~ Q) = a. Q) ~ .~ _= .... .,..;- ~ ¡:: ë ..c: ~ fij- E ,Q8 æ ~:S g = 'ï;Q) ~ - . E - 0. 3:: >-.~ ro ;> E ...... (ijQ)o.eQ) çroeE:!:::ten û5 I-..c: 0 æ..c: ::s 0_- "0 0... E ro.~ -0 C:(/)Q).co.o. >- >. 0 .- .... :J Q) 0 Nct)..t :=:.e:::2:£ 0 (/)"0 0 II)m Cc Q).- c..- c..Q) ctJ Q) ::I::äE -Q) ctJ"c "c- ~1â ~ 11)0 c'E o Q) +::E m E :30 00 rñ Q) -õ 0> ~ C £ .ct .5ø ~ ~ ~ ~ g~~ §5 _ _~ ø ~o ctI 0 .- cD a. «I _ C »0_- a. <1) n:J _ Q)-Q)-u ñJ·~(tJ ã:0 cucg.2£ c.c:¿ .t: £: IV -0 Q) (I) en.2 « -- Q) ~ Q).~ 0 <Q)~ j>m !~ ~.~ ~Q) ~~~ ~£g E~~ctI~~ ~~a u~ ;gg ctI Q) E.a 0 Q} t ±: . Q) D../e? æ 10- 10... >.~ ;J; .a ~ 0 ã5 a.~ rø: <5 êij .c E _ _ 0 n:J _ 0 Q)o o>octlc..ë:Oï=-oC: õ- (/)-C ~_.§ .9 ~ m a. E 0 E ~ ~ 0 ·Ë . ~ 5 =B ~ ~~Æ ~~!~~2~~g¡ ~~ .5§~ Cf.IJ::. (f) C"a,:::: õ Q.Es:3~ a. 0 ns ~ 0 0 :Joõ ro_~E.c roOO-~ ~> o~ E=.~ C~O~;:ë;;'õ>'§O £C'tI "C5>.Q) "t:.g.o 2 ~·-~ctJQ>~Eæog c:!:::E 2 a.~ cG1ã~~u Q) E_o_E -ëü U)O ~ .£:<UQ) êt5m;o-æEco~2 ÕÆ2 ~~r:: "U~:5 .E -a.U)E-o.5~~ 19:::: "'0-0 ~s~ .5.~~E~~~·ªæ~ gs ~SE -- g - en 'E ã> --.!:!? E Q) - ~ Q) ~ 0 en c: t a. ~1-Q)cQ)Q).2u.=E~"'O.::s:._ cø~ ::J0:s:: Q~2~EE~~1ã~~ig£ ~m 8~s ~ æ 8 Q) "55 § 5. <t5 .. Q) ~ ~ r;~ "S: 0 ~ Q) Cf) cE~E~~~oIE~oE~ e~ 5£0 oucQ)=(I)~5~~Q)o 0 ~10... .5 oc:~£m~~~~~1o...~~~ o~ ~Sê ~~E~~IEo~~oE~=o -~ -urn ~ >c-o -'c'-oo.a_"O "'O.c ci)Q)ã: .~-:;~:ê ::J8-g·Q ~"C.t: 0 Ë3 ~- c-g OJ ~u~ctI~æ~~E~~~oB eg ·~~S a: 8 0 .s:;:.S c. 0.13 Q) ø 0 ~ (/) 5 E ~ - õ c ~ ~cOQ)cØE·-·_Ø o~ ~~ ~~~is~~£g~~~~~óig g~~ ~::~,~~Eio~Q)~~~i~~ i~8 ~E~~~~~£~~~~w~$~o mä~ ~w~·-.Q=E~OßQ)=~~E~~ 5~~ øEm~~~ID~IDC~roU~-m~ ro~ EU~¡ü ~3~~~ø~~~EB ~~~ wffi~ü~~~§~2~.êQg§~~.~~~ EEo~oØ~·-~ID~~~OOID.__~~O Q.« c: Q) Q) =' (/) ·0 (( - C"' 0 ~ 0 10... ID '" C a. ~c.~¡~~g~§ .~~ß5~~~~·~Æ~ ã; ~"E Ìii rn ~~ E 0 § ~ m g. ~ O"C:5 ~ .~ C)~ o~O~!~~oo~~ciø:m~~IDE.~- ~~b·--~cü~~E~·EC51o...=~E~E C'æð~CD~ID0cc~oro~&~~om~ œ=>ffi ,<t:~ªEr=.Q)~2.æU)~.E~Q)ûjog~ ...-g..c:(:: .o~o £E~.a ·=g>~Q)E~g~:] :::J c: ~ ,2 g a. "'.0 y) 0 0 - ~ "E ..e = 8.. 2 '2 0 õ ¡~~~E!e~~~o~w~B~Øg.~c~s g~EE~rororogo~~2c~w~u~~~Q) ... 0E Ørn~~~{/)IDm~C~oQ)c~cD ~ ufO o.s ! tea' en -c _ û5 W:.c ~ ,g ~ Cd d> 0 B :: § <ñ 0 c [8. ~ g> ~ .Q.g ra.~ ,!:2 -0 0 :;:€ ::5 g. OJ ~~~~gg~~~·i~.~g~:5~~~8~~~~ >.~c·-ß~Q)o.Q)EEoQ){/)C:{/)æco=,o- ~~Oê~~(/)~..e E c~~~'ffiWQ)COUd> >g~~~s~~~~oo·o~~~~Ec~~~~~ -oo~~~ø~~~1o... ¿>~rn~mc.m"'rn ë3 . . 00 -õ ~ ~ C ~ 0t .£m ~ m g ~ g~", ê£ $ Q) ~~ (t$ 0 ~ .~ a. «f - 1: 2 'õ, a. cD CU - 2~~ ~èm ã:~ ~<t:.5 ~:5 c~¿ «;~ t~~ .êõ :a.."E ¡¡;-~ ~'3:g ~~~ E~~~~~ ~i~ ~'~ ~g~ ro Q.) E.a 0 Q.) t'1:: . Q) a. ~ ~ '- 10... >..~ 1i;.a ~ 8 ø g--æ ro ,Q.~ :5 E "E ~ .e : ~ g ~gB ~~c..E~m~gj8Ë 0.9l 2~ID ch'~ 2 co Q) Q)"O 0 <1> -5 ~.9 t >.~ ê'g £3 IDW·- ~>~c~-cc ~ ~= ·_~c en s=. ~ C 13>:::; fG Õ A., ~ E a. (,) cu :E 0 0 :Joo ro_~E.cE~oo_~ ~> O~ E~,~ §~2Æ~~'ê~§O £~ ~~Q) 'C =' .a ~ fG è ro cD ~ E 0> è3 (/) C._ E ~a.~ m1ij~~~Q)Eo-.£ _(ij Cf)U~ .Em~ Et)~;o7dECD~§ õ.!:!l 8~c "C~£ .E ~c.enE-o,S~.!Q g:t: -0-0 ~3~ .~~~g~~~€œ~ §~ ~S~ -ijf- ·"EQ)...·!:2EID-$W~ (,)(/) cta. ro~Q)gQ)Q)u~,-.E~u~~ ro. ~O= .~$2~.5E~~~~~æS£ ~~ 8~s :ä ~ g Q) ~ c 5. m - Q) ~ ~ ~'§ ·5 0 -" Q) (() cE~E~·~Q)o>mE·~o_E~ e~ ð5tt oucQ)=ø~.S~~mo 0 c.~ £ ~i~£ro.~~~~~~~~~ o~ ~.5ê CJ)E~UmE£~~_oE$~(,) ;~ ~¡~ ~~ ~ >-.~ -g Üo -g.2 ~~ g"6 c.~ ~£ g-g n.. >~ta- . -EC8-Eo 0 -_~ Q)"U2irogo>.~-g roErn'o.c ~cmg:5 iJ: 0 -0 0·- c: a.. 0.== Q) Q) c: (,) rn .::3 U ID ._ _ cO~-~'2oQ)g(/)E~~UJ, g~ ..emu ~~~j£~~£g~~~~;óig ~~~ ~~~·~~~EæO~.Q)~~ª~~~ ·g·~8 - ~ ~ -- - Q) ~ 0 >.- E c. . c. Q) Q) 0: c. c: Q) ~~·~,~B£E~ð~:~~Q)~.~~ ~.Q~ ~EQ)~~~2=Q)~Øro"O£==~~ -~Q) ë -0 ~ 1:: a. '-::.c.-:J en (I) ~ (,)·ë 0 en .Q a. 0) ~ ~ ~ ~ (t ~ g r- -2 -g .~ ,Q g> § æ:ê, , :g 8:t" EEO"oOQ)~-~Q)ro::J~oOQ)~_..emo ~~~!~~¿.~~oc~~g~~·t~~§~i ~~~~~~.QE:J¿~œRE~~Q)g~-'- Q)~~sQ)~~E8.Qw~romO~£~~~~ ~ Q) ~.~ :5 Œ> -g 8 ~ 10 g>;r; CD .- ~ ~ É a. E u c: ~~~~c~Q)Ø~u·2~E~~Q)~uE~.- :J 00 0 c: 0 '" E.c 0 a¡ 0 00 ~_ ~ R 0 ~ .. c: « =EI-Q)EN2en3_00~t;'-'~~ fi~g ·5~o '£E~2-dg~~(])@g>~-g ªce·~~0.~u~Oo-~1o...S~&EB~oTI CD æ a.,~:€ ~ ~ ~ Q)- 0 g-cn{g 0 -5 fhB.s .t:: C:.E g~EE~"'romg§~~2c~ø-o~>-~~.Q) ... ~8 E t:: C/) (/)"U 0.. ~ _w ID .s g c: -5 g _~ æ a. c: D c.. ~ _ 0·- ~ 'E ~ O)~ 513 en ~:E rn of: ~.c ~ 8..9 ~.~ ~<;.Q g-5}t.§ &i.~ § -5£.~-g.8 g~§ -; ~.~ -·-Ec-~'-°mE-Ofh ro~u_OO1o...~ >~c:·-~a.ma.Q)EEOQ)0Cf/)æco~o- ø"Uo§g=C/)!~ E c~g~'ffiøŒ>moQ) ænNma.~mømg ~C-~-c:ø?O~E ~~Æ~~ro~££~8ð~~~~<æ~Ææ£ õ - rfY~.5"'ISSION /" 6 R.ce CRT 7 PtIOlmCI 8 Mayfield .9 Mission! 10 Frisco ( ¡ .J~, _ isclalmer is map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. is map is a compilation of records, information and data located in yarious city, county, state and lera! offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and' is to be used for relerence rposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement 01 distance or ection or precision in the depiction 01 geographic fealures. If errors or discrepancies are lound ,ase contact 952-227-1107, The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota ,lutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user 01 this map acknowledges that the City shall not liable lor any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and Id harmless the City Irom any and all claims brought by User. ils employees or agents, or third rties which arise out of the use(s access or use of data provided. F ~5"'ISSION /' -6 RICE CAT -7 MOW(CI 8 Mayfield 9 Mission I 10 Frisco ( isclaimer is map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. is map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county, state and !era! offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used lor reference rposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information Syslem (GIS) Data used prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement 01 distance or ection or precision in the depiction of geographic features. If errors or discrepancies are found >ase contact 952-227-1107. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota ,lutes §466.03, Sub<!. 21 (2000). and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not liable lor any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend. indemnify, and Id harmess the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third rties which arise out 01 the use(s access or use of data provided. Public Hearing Area Notification Map Sand Companies, Inc* Concept PUD NW Corner Lyman Blvd. & Realigned Highway 101 City of Chanhassen ~f J:~ ¡§ i ~m ~I ~Æ , II ~ nJ on !! I ~ Subject Property ~ Properties Within 500 Feet ~ Additional Properties Notified - CHRisTOPHER T & AIMEE J ADAMS 8690 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 HOBERT F & KAREN L ANDERSON 8561 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 GREGG H & GERALDINE BARETTE 8695 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 TERRY LEE & MARl T BERANAK 8576 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 EDWARD S & NANCY J COUGHLIN 587 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PATRICK A & LAURENE FARRELL 801 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 THOMAS P HAGMAN & SUSAN M BARTENETTI 625 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DANIEL M & MELISSA LHERZOG 8790 LAKE SUSAN CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 RONALD G & JOYCE L HORR 8513 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PATRICIA JOHNSON 8715 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 RICHARDC & SUSAN M AMBERSON 8549 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 GREGG A & MICHELLE D AUNE 8705 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317' R STEVEN & MAURA BARNETT 8709 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JOSHUA E & CORA L CONKLIN 8990 QUINN RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JAMES A CURRY 6105 EDEN PRAIRIE RD #17 EDINA MN 55436 JASON J GILBERTSON & KAT JA JEANNERET 583 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN55317 HUSSAM HASSOUN 8537 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHRISTOPHER & DEBORA K HOL 8687 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 BRIAN W & KRISTIN A HOULE 880 LAKE SUSAN DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SHANNON G & MICHELLE A KERN 607 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MICHAELS & CATHERINE ANDERSON 8709 MARY JANECIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 RUSSELL G BAHENSKY 8552 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 WILLIAM E BENSON 8596 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ALAN COSENTINO & SHERRI BPER 8572 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 NORMAN & JACQUELINE ENGEL 8699 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 GREGG D GUTSCHOW & BARBARA J CLAYTON 8691 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 GREGORY J & SUSAN L HENKEL 8699 MARY ,IAf'J'= CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 TROY & JENNIFER HOLASEK 8556 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 BENJAMIN R K & DONNA M JOHNSON 8521 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LAWRENCE C & ELIZABETH KLEIN 9170 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 AL & M J KLlNGELHUTZTRUST c/o ALOYSIUS & M J KLlNGELHUTZ 8600 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ANTHONY LARSON & LINDSAY NELSON 8545 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 HARLAN C LEOPOLD 8553 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DAVID S & JANICE A LUN DQUIST 8705 MARY JANE CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MICHAEL G & KAREN L MCNEIL 8695 MARY JANE CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 TIMOTHY S & TAMARA S MILLER 579 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PAUL W & ANA E MORENO 603 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STEVE J & MARY A PANENO 8564 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JEFFREY A &MICHELLEM REITAN 8900 QUINN RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 THOMAS A & GRETA K ROSE 8541 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MARK S & TRACY L KURVERS 8560 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DENNIS H & RUTH L LAUFENBURGER 8673 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LONG LI & YING Z WANG 8557 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SO VAN L Y & ~USI\N YKUN UNG 8509 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CYNTHIA ANN MILLER 891 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PATRICK L & KIM M MISMASH 591 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CRAIG L & PATRICIA A MULLEN 611 ,$UMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SEONGWOO PARK & MIN JEONG HAN 8580 CHANHASSENHLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MICHAEL & MELISSA ROHRMOSER 8698 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JEFFREY A & TANYA L SCHNEIDER 8702 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MARK R & STACEY G LAKOSKY 8533 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 KHANH & KHIEM LE 631 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LUNDGREN BRaS CONSTRUCTION 935WAYZATA BLVD E WAYZATA MN 55391 ROBERT B MARTINOVICH & PATRICIA A MARTINOVICH 8592 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 GREG ALLAN MILLER 8801 LAKE SUSAN CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LISA K MOORE 8682 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 56317 ERIC S & JULIE A OYEN 615 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PHOULlTHAT PHANDANOUVONG & VA TSANA PHANDANOUVONG 8529 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 RAYMOND J ROOB JR& CHAE SUK ROOB 8584 CHANHA8SEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PAUL C SCHNETTLER & KATE D WARD SCHNETTLER 599 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 AMY J SCHUETTE ET AL 8990 QUINN RD PO BOX 68 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DONALD T SINNIGER & MICHELE MABEL 600 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JAMES JONATHON SOMMERS & KAREN D ROGGE 8683 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SPRINGFIELD HOMEOWNERS ASSN 7100 MADISON AVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55427 LESLIE E TIDSTROM 8679 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 UTPAL R VAIDYA & LEENA UTPAL VAIDYA 861 LAKE SUSAN DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JAMI DWALKER 8517 CHANHASSEN HLLS DR S 'CHANHASSEN MN 55317 KEITH E & LISA L SCHWEGLER 619 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DAVID M SMITH & PATRICE N LUNDGREN-SMITH 8568 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MARK R & JODI L SOTEBEER 8565 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DOT 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD 631 TRANSPORTATION BLDG ST PAUL MN 55155 ABBA J TREGOBOV & SUSANA P MACHADO-TREGOBOV 8714 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STEVEN H & RUTH M VANCE 8588 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CORY M & PAMELA S WATKINS 595 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MARK & KRISTINA SCHWENDINGER 8708 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JUDSON E & JILL C SNELL 8694 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CURTIS A & SUSAN M SPERLING 8525 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 BRUCE A & SHEILA M TANQUIST 8569 CHANHJ\SSENHLS DR-$' ' CHANHASSEN MN 55317 US WEST NEW VECTOR GROUP INC ATTN: TAX DEPT MIS 624 PO BOX 7028 BEDMINSTER NJ 07921 BRYAN J & LISA C VAN NINGEN ' 8686 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 FRANK T & MARY LOU WHALEY 851 LYMAN BL VO _ CHANHASSEN MN55317 ~~'Ç~'%\~~~~7'~Õ~~'~~~~~~~~~ ·~SCI . Sand Companies, Inc. December 8, 2004 366 SOllth Tenth Avenue PO Box 727 Waite Park. \r1N 56387-0727 Office: (320) 202-3100 Fax: (320)202-3139 E-mail: SCI((~:SandCompanies.com \Vebsite: ww\v,SandCompanies.com Greetings from Sand Companies, Inc. Sand Companies, Inc. is proposing to dCV\elop the northwest and southwest quadrants of .' the future. realigned Highway.lOJ·and:,;t1:k new Highway 312 (formerly 212) into a neighborhood commercial and residential development. We are inviting you to an informal neighborhood meeting to answer any questions and invite your input about our proposed development. Date: Time: Location: Thursday, December 16. 2004 7 :00 p.m. Country Suites Chanhassen 591 West 78th Street Chanhassen, :MN 55317 Pine and Oak Rooms 952-937-2424 .. ,"-0."·_-'->.-. _ _ _ If you have any questions in advañcé òfthemeeting, please do not hesitate to contact me at (320) 202-3100 or via e-mail atRAHelmings@SandCompanies.com. You can also visit our website at www.SandCompanies.com to learn about our current deyelopments. Thank: you. ~ Construction . Property Management . Development Equal OppOrTl/llify Elllp/Ôyer ZONING § 20.:.680 (2) The minimum lot frontage is as follows: a. If a two-family dweHing is located 'o~ the l~t, fÙtý (5bXfeet per dvirening~t, except that if the lot fronts on a cul-de-sac, the lot shall be fifty (50) feet in width at the building setback line. . b. If a townhóuse or multiple-family project is located on the Jot, one hundred fiftY (150) feet. . - (3) The minimum lot depth is one hup,dred 1ifty-fi:v~- (155)fe'et. (4) The maximum lot coverage is thirty-five (35) percent. (5) The setbacks are as foHows: a. For front yards, twenty-five (25) feet. b. For rear yards, twenty-five (25) feet. c. För side yards, ten (10) feet. (6) The maximU1t\ height is as follows: a. For the principal structure, three (3) stories/ thirty-five (35)feet. '. (Oid. : b. For accessory structures, one·(l) story/fifteen (15) feet. i .j Sec. 20-676. Interim uses. The fol1owing are interim uses in the "R-12" District; (1) Reserved. (2) Temporary real estate office and model homes. (Ord. Nu. J.¿.V, 'a oJ, ú-~ú-õJV/ ~'- . Sees. 20-677-20-679. Reserved. Sec. 20-680. Intent. /' . , The intent of the R-16 District is to provide for multifamily' residential structures ata maximum net density of sixteen (16) dwelling rinit"Sper aëre on l~d guided for high density residenti~ use~ by the city comprehensive plan. (Ord. No. 123, § 1,3-12-90) *Editor's note-Section 1 of Ord. No. 123, adopted Mar. 12, 1990,åìnended Ait. xv by adding §§ 20-680-20-684. At the editor's discretion, i~he new proyisions have been includßdas Div. 2 to this article.> " ' " ). Supp_ No, 9 1219 § 20-681 CHANHASSEN CITY CODE Sec. 20-681. Permitted uses. The fonowing uses are permitted ill an R-16 District: (1) Multifaml1y dwe}lings. (2) Public and private parks and open space. ,(3) Utility services. (4) Antennas as regulated by article XXX of this chapter. ' (Ord. No. 123, § 1,3-12-90; Ord: No. 25'9, §19, 11:12':96) _.~ ·:n -': Sec. 20-682. Permitted accessory uses. The following are permitted ac~essoryuses in an R~16 District: (1) Garage. (2) Storage building. (3) Swimming pool. (4) Tennis court. (5) Signs as per allowed in R-12 District. (6) Home occupations. (7) One (1) dock. (Ord. No. 12~, § 1, 3-12-90) Sec. 20-683. Conditional uses. The following are conditional uses in anR-16 District: lJ) Churches. (2) Day care center. (3) Group home serving from seven (7) to sixteen (16) persons. ('1) Health services. ~) Recreational beach lots. l') Temporary real estate office and model hOfle. (,).. Towers and antennas as regulated by-article XXX of this chapter. Sec'~ 2Ö-684: Lot 'requirements antI setbacks. The following minimum requireme~ts shall be obserVed in an R~'16t>'ìstrict subject to additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in tills chapter: " , (1) The minimum lot area is as fonows~ , ' , , , , ' . ' , a: 'I\vo'thoùsandseven hundred (2,700) square feet per dwelling unit. Supp_ No.9 1220 Ji J ~ ..)¡ J )/ .,,~J / f J 1 ZONIN:G. , " §20-692 _ /-(2) The maximum lot coverage is fifty (50) percent. (3) The building setbacks 'are as follows: a. For front yards, fifty (50) feet. b. For rear yards, fifty (50) feet. c. For side yards, fifty (50) feet. (4) Parking setbacks shall be twenty-five (25) feet from all property lines. (5) The maximum height is as follows: a. For the principal structure, three (3) störies/thirty-five(35) fœt. - ~b. For accessory structures, one (1) story/:fifte~n (15)feet. (Ord. No. 123, § 1, 3-12-90) , , _, Sees. 20-685-20-690. Reserved. ~ ----------- ARTJCLE XVI. ''EN' NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS DISTRICT Sec. 20-691. Intent. The intent of the "EN" District is to provide for limited low intensity neighborhöód'retáÙ and service establishments to meet daily needs of residents. COrd. No. 80, Art. V, § 10C5~10-1), 12-15-86) Sec. 20-692. Permitted uses. The following uses are .permitted in a "EN" DIstrict: . -- ''''-'-.' -"" (1) Antenna as regulated by article XXX of this chapter. (2) Community center. '(3) Convenience stores without gas pumps. ' (4) Day care center. (5) Health services. (6) Home Furnishings. (7) , Offices. (8) Personal services. (9) Private clubs and lodges. (10) Shopping center. ,(11) Small appliance repair shop ~upp. No. 10 ..,~.",", lZ21 § 20-692 CHANHASSENCITY CODE /?),.,' " (12) , Specialty Retail Shop. (13) Utility services. (14) Veterinary clinics. Sec. 20-693-. Permitted accessory,uses. The following are permitted accessory uses in a "BN" District:' -- , (1) Parking lots. (2) Reserved. (3) Signs. (4) Temporary outdoor sales (subject to the requirements of section 20-312). '-;G,±-;;TiJ J I, Sec. 20-694. Conditional uses. The following are conditional uses in a "BN" :Qistrict: n.._.!.L1_ .~_ _ (1) Bed and breakfast establishments. i ¡ , ì I ¡ ¡ ì ¡ i I ! i I i f 'j ¡ j (2) Convenience store with gas pumps. (3) Drive-in banks including automated kiosks. (4) Fast food restaurants without a drive-through as part of a shopping center. (5) Motor Fuel Station. "'), .-;.;< (6) Reserved. § 4(7), (7) Standard restaurants. ---.- - --- _____.A;.........._.... '--t.:I'w"¡¡:)) ~y...;........... -:a.v.....___~_. '."_p" _._._u_. Sec. 20-695. Lot requirêments and setbacks. The following minimum requirements shall be observed iri à "BN" Disiriét subject to' , ' additional requirements, ,exceptions and modifications set forth in this chapter: (1) The minimum district area is three (3) acres. This paragraph may be waivedinihè case· of expansion to an èxisting district. (2) The minimum lot area is fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet.' (3) ,The minimum lot frontage is seventy-five (75) feet, except that lots fronting on a ' ". .. cul-de-sac shall have a minimum frontage of sixty (60) feet in all districts. (4) The minimum lot depth is one hundred fifty (150) feet. (5) The maximum lot coverage including all structures and paved surfaces is sixty-five (65) percent. Supp. No. 10 1222 ZONING § 20-695 (6)' Off.sh-éet parking shall èompiy vri~~ Mstrict setbackrequirem.entS e.xcept: . .'. - .;.. "-." .. --"".' a. There is no minimum setback when it abuts a railroad-right-of,:,way, except as provided in sections 20-1191 and 20-1192 pertaining to landscaping require- , ments. .. ) b. There is no minimum~etback when it abuts, without beingßeparated by a street, another off-street ~~rkÍI1g areå. ' , , c. ,The minimum s,etb~~k i~ fifty (50) feet wheD: it abuts a resid-ential distrlctwithout being separated from the residential district by a street or railroad right-of-way. d; The minimum setback is ,twenty-five (25) feet for side street side yards. e. Parking setbacks along public rights-or-way may be reduced to a minimum often (10) feet if the applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the city that one-hundred-percent screening is provided at least five (5) féet above the adjacent parking lot. The intent of this section is that the city is willing to trade a reduced setback for additional landscaping that is both an effective screen and of high quality aesthetically. Acceptable screening is to be comprised of berming arid landscaping. Screening through the use of fencing is not permitted. (7) The maximum height is as follows: a. For the principal structure, one (1) story. b. For accessory structures, one (1) story. (8) Minimum setback requirements: a. For front yards, thirty-five @Qlfeet. b. For rear yards, thirty Q!Q)..feet. c. For side yards, fifteen (.!§).feet. d. The minimum setback is fifty (50) feet when it abuts a residential distriCt without being separated from the residential district bya strèetor railroad right-of-way. e. Buffer yards: The city comprehensive plan establishes.a requirement for buffer yards. Buffer yards are to be established in areas indicated on the plan where higher intensity uses interface with low density-uses. In theseareás.. a fifty-foot buffer yard is to be provided where the interface occ)-lrs along a public street, a one-hundred-foot buffer yard is .required where the interface occurs on internal lot lines. The buffer yard is an additional setback requirement. It is to be cun;,uÚlti";ely calculated with the required setbacks outlined above. The fullobligàtion to provide the buffer yard shall be placed on the parcel containing the higher intensity use. 5 The buffer yard is intended to provide additional physical separation and screening for the higher intensity use. AB such, they will be required to be provided with, a combination of berming, landscaping and/or tree preservation to maximize the, buffering potential. To the extent deemed feasible by the city, new plantings shall be Supp. No.9 1223 §,20-695 CHANItASSEN CITY CODE "ì\ J1 '/ designed to require theminimmn ofm~t~~ance, hQwever, such maint~narice as ~ay , be reqUired to maintain consistency with ffieapprpvèd plan, shall be the obligation of -' < . ,. the propértY oWner. ',' -- Buffer yards shall be coveied by~pè~~entljr recorded cons~rvation easement running in favor of the city. . - - . .'. In Instances ~hé~e èxistingtopography and/or vei~t.ation provide b~ffering satisfac- tory to the city,. or where quality site planning is achieved, the city may reduce buffer yardreqùiremehtä by up to fifty (50) percent. The applicant shaUhave the full burden of démo1istt~tirig coinplHince with the standards herein. (Ord. No. 80, Art. ".. § 10(5-10-5), 12-15-86; Ord. No. 94, §§ 1, 2, 7"25~88;Ord. No. 136, §§ IA, lB, 1-28-91) .. Sec. 20-696. Interim uses. The following are interim uses iIi thè "BN" 'District: (1) Churches., (2) Reserved. (Ord. No. 120, § 3, 2-12-90; Ord. No. 243, § 4,2-13-95) Sees. 20-697-20-710. Reserved. ~ ,>:¡.~ -J .~...{_?,J ARTICLE XVII. ''BII'' mGHWAY AND BUSINESS SÈRVICES DISTRICT Sec. 20-711. Intent. The intent of the "BH" District is to provide for high\yay oriented commercial development restrict~d to a low buil.dingprofùe. (Ord. N~. 80, Art. ".,§11(5-11-:j, 12-l5-86) , , Sec. 20-712. Permitted uses. Thefon~wing uses are permitf;edin a "BH" District: ' .-- ~ .-.. - ----- (I) Antennas as regulated by article xxx: of thiš cbapter. (2) Car wash. (3) Cortununity center. ( t¡ ') Convenience stores without gas pumps. (5) Day care center. (t) Fast food restaurant. (7)' Financial institutions with/or without drive-throughsèrvices. Supp_ No.9 1224 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 379 AN ORDINANCE A1vIENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by rezoning all property as described below from RSF, Single Family Residential District to PUD-Mixed Use, Planned Unit Development-Mixed Use: All of west half of the northwest quarter of section 24, township 11 Ó, range 23, lying southerly of the right-of-way for TH 312 and easterly of right-of-way line of realigned TH 101, and north of the right-of-way for Lyman Boulevard. Section 2. The rezoning of this property is subject to the following design standards: PUD DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a Mixed Use PUD including a Transit Oriented Development, Neighborhood Commercial and Residential. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive development. Each structure proposed for development shall proceed through site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. b. Permitted Uses · The permitted uses in this zone should be limited to appropriate commercial and service uses consistent with meeting the daily needs of the neighborhood and the transit facility users. The uses shall be limited to those as defined herein. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Community Development Director shall make that interpretation. The type of uses to be provided on these lots shall be low intensity neighborhood oriented retail and service establishments to meet daily needs of residents. Commercial and transit uses shall be limited to the area located north of the access point off of Highway 101. Residential uses shall be located south of the Highway 101 access. · Small to medium sized restaurant-not to exceed 8,000 square feet per building (no drive-thru windows) · Office · day care · neighborhood scale commercial up to 8,000 square feet per building footprint · convenience store without gas pumps · specialty retail (book store jewelry, Sporting Goods sale/rental, Retail Sales, Retail Shops, Apparel Sales, etc.) · personal services (an establishment or place of business primarily engaged in providing individual services generally related to personal needs, such as a tailor shop, Shoe Repair, Self-service Laundry, Laundry Pick-up Station, Dry Cleaning, dance studios, etc). · Park and Ride not to exceed 800 spaces. · Residential High Density (8-16 units per acre). c. Prohibited Ancillary Uses · Drive thru Windows · Outdoor storage and display of merchandise d. Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks: Boundary Lyman Boulevard Highway 101 , . Highway 212 excluding transit shelters and ramps Easterly Project Property Line Internal Project property lines Hard Surface Coverage Commercial and Transit Facility Hard Surface Coverage Maximum Residential Building/Structure Height Maximum Commercial Building/Structure Height Maximum Park and Ride Ramp excluding the elevator shaft and stair well e. Non Residential Building Materials and Design Building and Parking Setback 50 feet 35 feet north of the Highway 101 access and 50 feet south of the 101 access 50 feet 100 Feet o Feet 50 % 70 % 35 or 3 stories, whichever is less 1 story 25 or 3 stories, whichever is less 1. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. The intent is to create a neighborhood and transit friendly development. 2 -- 2. All materials shall be of high quality and durable. Major exterior surfaces of all walls shall be face brick, stone, glass, stucco, architecturally treated concrete, cast in place panels, decorative block, or cedar siding. Color shall be introduced through colored block or panels and not painted block or brick. Bright, long, continuous bands are prohibited. 3. Block shall have a weathered face or be polished, fluted, or broken face. Exposed cement ("cinder") blocks shall be prohibited. 4. Metal siding, gray concrete, curtain walls and similar materials will not be approved except as support material to one of the above materials, or as trim or as HV AC screen, and may not exceed more than 25 percent of a wall area. 5. All accessory structures shall be designed to be compatible with the primary structure. 6. All roof mounted equipment shall be screened by walls of compatible appearing material. Wood screen fences are prohibited. All exterior process machinery, tanks, etc., are to be fully screened by compatible materials. All mechanical equipment shall be screened with material compatible to the building, 7. The buildings shall have varied and interesting detailing. The use of large unadorned, concrete panels and concrete block, or a solid wall unrelieved by architectural detailing, such as change in materials, change in color, fenestrations, or other significant visual relief provided in a manner or at intervals in keeping with the size, mass, and scale of the wall and its views from public ways shall be prohibited. Acceptable materials will incorporate textured surfaces, exposed aggregate and/or other patterning. All walls shall be given added architectural interest through building design or appropriate landscaping. 8. There shall not be underdeveloped backsides of buildings. All elevations shall receive nearly equal treatment and visual qualities. 9. The materials and colors used for each building shall be selected in context with the adjacent building and provide for a harmonious integration with them. Extreme variations between buildings in terms of overall appearance, bulk and height, setbacks and colors shall be prohibited. f. Residential Standards 1. Building exterior material shall be a combination of fiber-cement siding, vinyl siding, stucco, or brick with support materials such as cedar shakes, brick and stone or approved equivalent materials as determined by the city. 2. Each unit shall utilize accent architectural features such as arched louvers, dormers, etc. 3 3. All units shall have access onto an interior private street. 4. All mechanical equipment shall be screened with material compatible to the building or landscaping. 5. A design palette shall be approved for the entire project. The palette shall include colors for siding, shakes, shutters, shingles, brick and stone. 6. All foundation walls shall be screened by landscaping or retaining walls. g. Site Landscaping and Screening The intent of this section is to improve the appearance of vehicular use areas and property abutting public rights-of-way; to require buffering between different land uses; and to protect, preserve and promote the aesthetic appeal, character and value of the surrounding neighborhoods; to promote public health and safety through the reduction of noise pollution, air pollution, visual pollution and glare. 1. The landscaping standards shall provide for screening for visual impacts associated with a given use, including but not limited to, truck loading areas, trash storage, parking lots, Large unadorned building massing, etc. 2. Each lot for development shall submit a separate landscaping plan as a part of the site plan review process. 3. All open spaces and non-parking lot surfaces, except for plaza areas, shall be landscaped, rockscaped, or covered with plantings and/or lawn material. Tree wells shall be included in pedestrian areas and plazas. 4. Undulating berms, north of Lyman Boulevard and east of Highway 101 shall be sodded or seeded at the conclusion of grading and utility construction. The required buffer landscaping may be installed where it is deemed necessary to screen any proposed development. All required boulevard landscaping shall be sodded. 5. Loading areas shall be screened from public right-of-ways. Wing walls may be required where deemed appropriate. 6. Native species shall be incorporated into site landscaping, whenever possible. h. Street Furnishings Benches, kiosks, trash receptacles, planters and other street furnishings should be of design and materials consistent with the character of the area. Wherever possible, street furnishings should be consolidated to avoid visual clutter and facilitate pedestrian movement. 4 i. Sign age The intent of this section is to establish an effective means of communication in the development, maintain and enhance the aesthetic environment and the business's ability to attract sources of economic development and growth, to improve pedestrian and traffic safety, to minimize the possible adverse effect of signs on nearby public and private property, and to enable the fair and consistent enforcement of these sign regulations. It is the intent of this section, to promote the health, safety, general welfare, aesthetics, and image of the community by regulating signs that are intended to communicate to the public, and to use signs which meet the city's goals: · Establish standards which permit businesses a reasonable and equitable opportunity to advertise their name and service; · Preserve and promote civic beauty, and prohibit signs which detract from this objective because of size, shape, height, location, condition, cluttering or illumil1::1.tion; · Ensure that signs do not create safety hazards; · Ensure that signs are designed, constructed, installed and maintained in a manner that does not adversely impact public safety or unduly distract motorists; · Preserve and protect property values; · Ensure signs that are in proportion to the scale of, and are architecturally compatible with, the principal structures; · Limit temporary commercial signs and advertising displays which provide an opportunity for grand opening and occasional sales events while restricting signs which create continuous visual clutter and hazards at public right-of-way intersections. 1. Project Identification Si2ll: One project identification sign shall be permitted for the development at the entrance off of Highway 101. Project identification signs shall not exç~ed 80 square feet in sign display area nor be greater than eight feet in height. The sign shall be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the property line. 2. Monument Sign: One monument sign shall be permitted at the entrance to the development off of Lyman Boulevard. This sign shall not exceed 24 square feet in sign display area nor be greater than five feet in height. The sign shall be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the property line. 3. Wall Signs: a. The location of letters and logos shall be restricted to the approved building sign bands, the tops of which shall not extend greater than 20 5 feet above the ground. The letters and logos shall be restricted to a maximum of 30 inches in height. All individual letters and logos comprising each sign shall be constructed of wood, metal, or translucent facing. b. Illuminated signs that can be viewed from neighborhoods outside the PUD site. are prohibited. c. Tenant sign age shall consist of store identification only. Copy is restricted to the tenant's proper name and major product or service offered. Corporate logos, emblems and similar identifying devices are permitted provided they are confined within the signage band and do not occupy more than 15% of the sign area unless the logo is the sign. 4. Festive Flags/Banners a. Flags and banners shaH be permitted on approved standards attached to the building facade and on standards attached to pedestrian area lighting. b. Flags and banners shall be constructed of fabric or vinyl. c. Banners shall not contain advertising for individual users, businesses, services, or products. d. Flags and banners shall project from buildings a maximum of two feet. e. Flags and banners shall have a maximum area of 10 square feet. f. Flags and banners which are tom or excessively worn shall be removed at the request of the city. 5. Building Directory a. In multi-tenant buildings, one building directory sign may be permitted. The directory sign shall not exceed eight square feet. 6. Directional Signs a. On-premises signs shall not be larger than four (4) square feet. The maximum height of the sign shall not exceed five (5) feet from the ground. The placement of directional signs on the property shall be so located such that the sign does not adversely affect adjacent properties (including site lines or confusion of adjoining ingress or egress) or the general appearance of the site from public rights-of-way. No more than four (4) signs shall be allowed per lot. The city council may allow 6 additional signs in situations where access is confusing or traffic safety could be jeopardized. b. Off-premises signs shall be allowed only in situations where access is confusing and traffic safety could be jeopardized or traffic could be inappropriately routed through residential streets. The size of the sign shall be no larger than what is needed to effectively view the sign from the roadway and shall be approved by the city council. c. Bench signs are prohibited except at transit stops as authorized by the local transit authority. d. Signs and Graphics. Wherever possible, traffic control, directional and other public signs should be consolidated and grouped with other street fixtures and furnishings to reduce visual clutter and to facilitate vehicular and pedestrian movement. A system of directional signs should also be established to direct traffic within the commercial area and away from residential areas. 7. Prohibited Si2ns: · Individual lots are not permitted low profile ground business sign. · Pylon signs are prohibited. · Back lit awnings are prohibited. · Window Signs are prohibited except for company logo/symbol and not the name. Such logo shall not exceed 10% of a window area · Menu Signs are prohibited. 8. Si2n Desi2n and permit requirements: a. The sign treatment is an element of the architecture and thus should reflect the quality of the devetopm.~nt. The signs should be consistent in color, size, and material and height throughout the development. A common theme will be introduced at the development's entrance monument and will be used throughout. b. All signs require a separate sign permit. c. Wall business signs shall comply with the city's sign ordinance for the Neighborhood business district for determination of maximum sign area. Wall signs may be permitted on the "street" front and primary parking lot front of each building. j. Lighting 1. Lighting for the interior of the development shall be consistent throughout the 7 development. High pressure sodium vapor lamps with decorative natural colored pole shall be used throughout the development parking lot area for lighting. Decorative, pedestrian scale lighting shall be used in plaza and sidewalk areas and may be used in parking lot areas. CoeIrOI.Poñ: SorioIPot( Ma4eI CP l2I11-CAiBX l2.FfIlí u ~~ . ....ntiaœ Street r -r Jrvo. 10___ 2. Light fixtures should be kept to a pedestrian scale (12 to 18 feet). Street light fixtures should accommodate vertical banners for use in identifying the commercial area. The fixtures shall conform with (Figure 36 - Chanhassen Lighting Unit Design). î F!Iun ~ . ~ Il&btiDI Uull n.Ip 41 3. All light fixtures shall be shielded. Light level for site lighting shall be no more than 1/2 candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. 4. Lighting for parking areas shall minimize the use of lights on pole standards in the parking area. Rather, emphasis should be placed on building lights and poles located in close proximity to buildings. k. Non Residential Parking 1. Parking shall be provided based on the shared use of parking areas whenever possible. Cross access easements and the joint use of parking facilities shall be protected by a recorded instrument acceptable to the city. 2. The development shall be treated as an integrated shopping center and provide a minimum of one space per 200 square feet'of commercial/retail area. The office/personal service component shall be treated as an integrated office building and provide 4.5 space per 1,000 square feet for the first 49,999 square feet, four per thousand square feet for the second 50,000 square feet, and 3.5 per thousand square feet thereafter. I. Residential Parking shall comply with city code requirements. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. 8 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 28th day of June, 2004. A TIEST: Todd Gerhardt, Clerk/Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor (Summary Ordinance published in the Chanhassen Villager on July 151\ 2004) " ~ 9 Sand Com · Land U pames se Detail Map ", \ I " ).-- )-/ -ll I /~/þ( II f j /í{lll::~' !! 11'lfll;¡ f! 'I ,ji IF ;! I" . - -Ii,. ,.1' " [VÖWNHÖlJse~' ¡~ ~,\~~,." ( ~ -=~ l/.$b APTS I, .., -..F~]i;iY' ',' 1" ,'i j'" L I', ,n TOWNHOUSES ¡ I" ¡ æ/.1 ; /,7 v' ..--:'~~ --"" 'I ./; _~.c-.....-<;;;; r:_ " ; .f~:::·¿"'-~<' /~_;..~??#~::::ØPß /,,', .,<~~/ ~/ ~;~~, ----~", ~~\ '''\ ,\ \\~, ~! fA ill j::// ~~/' ~þ _ ' =--.7' ,/ ----ý'-~' ~~~/ ~/ ~f , , //r ~ ~ /,,/""""'" ~ "-r'. í , , , , , , !-\ . \ I ~ j " ¡ 1 " 1/- ~·1r -~ COMMERCIAL SOUTHWEST M ETRQ TRANSIT APTS. i ~! ~¡ 0' a. ~!) H~ j; !:¡ ! ' ~! ~~~ OFFICE 1:- w 11.. 11.. ::¡ en COMMERCIAL -------,.- ~ _~ 50' BUFFER ' - _~ ,,~_ _ ___ "" _ _-=-r~ I( I . -=- _ :;~=:-/~~~__ 50' BUFFER ~~ ~,¡_ _ ~J I" -"- ¡ ',~ j , ,("~" i ~~-_, ",\ ¡c' ~-~~ ) lì4ioíL-'- ~----~-r' III1 ¡'" \ I I \ \ -------- !I j I' ./" \ / I \ \ '; ¡. <,/ " 1 { I \~ ,: ,I' /,". ' " I !iil'"'-. y/~! \ j ¡ , ¡,: ' -........ í ~ hUI!f .,.,i ,;/~Iñ /' , ' ' ..--\ t / í I \ \ o LO [I RESIDENTIAL --------- Planning Commission Meeting - January 4,2005 PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR CONCEPT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR COMMERCIAL, OFFICE AND MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT ON APPROXIMATELY 22 ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LYMAN BLVD AND THE FUTURE REALIGNED HIGHWAY 101, SAND COMPANIES, INC., PLANNING CASE No. 05-01. Public Present: Name Address Jamie Thelen Jim Sand Al Klingelhutz Richard A. Hennings Christopher Hol Keith Collins Patty & Craig Mullen April Halbe 366 South 10th Avenue, Waite Park, MN 366 South 10th A venue, Waite Park, MN 8600 Great Plains Boulevard 366 South 10th Avenue, Waite Park, MN 8687 Chanhassen Hills Drive North 7420 Coventry Way, Edina 611 Summerfield Drive 9151 Great Plains Boulevard Kate Aanenson presented the staff report on this item. Lillehaug: .. . and then can you comment on the very northerly parcel, parcel number 5. I think I missed it. Why is that odd shaped right-of-way skewing down? What's the deal with that? Aanenson: Yeah. That's Qwest has a building there. Qwest, a switch station. Lillehaug: So the City's going to maintain permanent right-of-way over that whole entire area? Aanenson: That's not our's. It was sold to Qwest so yeah. See you've got this whole triangle piece here. What it does is. Lillehaug: Can you show that in outline, just to make sure we're talking about the same thing. Aanenson: Can you zoom in? You're talking about this piece right here. Lillehaug: Right. I mean it's approximately 60 feet plus or minus wide for you know that entire stretch and is that, so you're saying that's not going to be city right-of-way? Aanenson: There will be right-of-way in front of it, but what I'm saying is that, if you look at this is a picture superimposed over. There's a restricted median right here. So you can come in tight but how do you get out? There's a median, Lillehaug: I don't think we're on the same page. Looking at this, it's this whole area right here. 1 Planning Commission Meeting - January 4, 2005 Aanenson: Yeah, I don't... Saam: It's not right-of-way Steve. I think you think it's right-of-way. It's not right-of-way. Lillehaug: That's the question. Okay, thank you. Sacchet: Any other questions of staff? No? With that I'd like to invite the applicant to come forward to give us your presentation. The short version if I may ask for it. Jim Sand: Agreed. Thank you Mr. Chairman, members of the commission, city staff. My name is Jim Sand and I'm the Vice President of Sand Companies. Vice President of Development and I have with us tonight part of our team. Our senior architect, Richard Hennings is here with us and our company President Jamie Thelen. And I don't have a lot to add to Kate's comments other than we did hold a neighborhood meeting on December 16th. We had approximately 30 neighbors and one of the commission members attend. We had a lot of good feedback. A lot of good questions and felt that it was a real good chance to meet our neighbors. With that I'll turn it over to Richard who has larger renditions of what we're proposing and go through that. Sacchet: Thank you. Richard Hennings: I think in the interest of time I would just cover, I think Kate did an admirable job of explaining our project to us so I'll just cover a few of the things that I think are pertinent. The issue of the. Sacchet: Excuse me. Do you mind directing the microphone towards you a little bit? Richard Hennings: Close enough? Sacchet: Yeah, thank you. Richard Hennings: Speaking to the issue of the median on Lake Susan Drive, and you may have more CUlTent information than I did. When we first started the project we were told that that meeting was going to be there. I contacted, and I don't remember the name but I contacted the engineer and he told me at that time, he thought 115 feet, and so he was encouraging me to say it's okay to put driveways off. I understand though on the other hand you had a conversation as recently as yesterday so. Aanenson: No. All plans, just to be clear, as in the previous one, all plans go to affected jurisdictions so obviously this plan went up to MnDot. We met with Jon Chiglo who is in charge of this whole project for 212 and he was aware that they're trying to draft or look at how we solve the problem because he's aware of the conflict so. Richard Hennings: I think the other thing I just want to bring up, we had talked earlier about the roadway through the southern parcel and right now the drawing that we had prepared is, I'm not a traffic engineer but I try to reflect what I thought would be kind of a traffic calming road here and so I portrayed the road as not terribly wide and with intentional fairly sharp comers. As 2 Planning Commission Meeting - January 4,2005 ways of slowing the traffic and not encouraging it as a cut through. So kind of a fine line between a convenient to get here but not so convenient that it's a better way than going through the intersection at Lyman and I guess that's the direction we would give to civil engineers when we're talking to them and see if they can translate that into real engineering, but so right now it is intentionally drawn with 90 degree comers that would have a fairly tight radius I guess I'd describe it, so that that's one of the points you'd have to slow down, and that the roadway would not be very wide and so that we wouldn't have passing lanes and all those kinds of things. And the one other piece of information I thought we should share. The local watershed district is developing a wide area, an area wide project for purposes of water clarity on Lake Riley and some other things. And they have contacted us in regard to utilizing part of the wetland here as part of that project and what they're suggesting that they may excavate part of that wetland and create more open water as a holding pond, a fairly deep holding pond so they get quality control. That's what they're looking for. Not quantity control but quality control, and we would cooperate with them in that our other ponds would have to do with quantity control and their's would do with quality control so I would think as our project moves along we'll probably see some more information on that develop there. And then the last thing about affordable housing. Sand Companies is an active developer of tax credit housing. We have done a dozen projects over the last 8-10 years. Currently we'll have one more townhouse project in St. Joseph, Minnesota that will be constructed this year, so we are interested in that. Obviously you know it's a competitive process and just because we can all say we're interested doesn't mean that the Minnesota Housing Finance Corporation will see fit to do that. But it would be of interest to us to explore using tax credit financing for one of the buildings on the north side, and particularly the apartment building. So while we have designated a 3 story apartment building, we have to admit that we don't have a clear market for that. We have also given consideration to developing a senior cooperative on that site the same way because we think that's an interesting market here, so the usage we really haven't clarified there yet but I think you can safely assume that we will explore the tax credit housing automatically and to the extent that it is possible so. With that I guess I would just turn it over to see if there are any other questions. Sacchet: Excellent. Any questions from the applicant? No? Thank you very much. Appreciate it. With that, this is a public hearing. I'd like to open this for comments from anybody here who'd like to address this item. Please come forward at this time, if you want to address this item. And state your name and address for the record please. Let us know what you have to say. Patty Mullen: My name is Patty Mullen. I live at 611 Summerfield Drive. I'd like to start by saying unfortunately I wasn't able to make the neighborhood meetings and I wonder if there's another oPPOltunity to get a little more input before I maybe start addressing concerns that might not be. And my biggest concerns would be that the development stay consistent with the things that are already developed in the area so as not to jeopardize the integrity of those. And I need a better understanding of buffering. Aanenson: We can certainly facilitate a meeting where we can come in and go through that specifically what the PUD buffering is and all that. We'd be happy to do that. Patty Mullen: Okay, thank you, 3 Planning Commission Meeting - January 4,2005 Sacchet: Thank you very much. Are there any other residents? Yes, if you want to please come forward and state your name and address and what you have to share with us. Chris Hol: My name's Chris Hol. I live at 8687 Chanhassen Hills Drive North so I'm on the very north end of this project. Now my concern is first of all apartment buildings. I mean you know if it's a two level building, that's fine. But I think 3, you know we moved out this way for the beauty of it and now I don't want to be looking out my back window at apartment buildings. Thankfully I'm not as affected as some of my neighbors are, but the other concern I would say is now, 101, is that going to be cul-de-saced? Saam: Yeah. Chtis Hol: So that will be down there. There won't be any way to cut through? Aanenson: Yeah, at the end ofthis, the old 101 will be cul-de-saced.. . also towards the end where the creek is. Chris Hol: Right. Okay. Aanenson: It would not be for cut through traffic either. Chris Hol: Yeah, because the only other thing I would, my concern is, and I know it's been brought up is the Lake Susan Drive. You know people that don't want to come all the way up here are now going to maybe cut through and it's going to cause a lot more traffic for us. Aanenson: Yeah, that was one of the things we talked about with the traffic study. Chtis Hol: Good, okay. That's all I want to say. Thank you. Sacchet: Anybody else want to address this item? Yes, AI. Please. Al Klingelhutz: Chairman, Planning Commission members. I'm Al Klingelhutz and in 8600 Great Plains Boulevard and most of the land we're talking about here tonight was land that I farmed for 60 some years. Was in my family since 1862 and I guess the one concern I have is this piece here. Aanenson: It's a connection, as I mentioned before. This is Mr. Klingelhutz' property. The original farmstead. Is how do you get access to these pieces. Al Klingelhutz: Through this property right here. And the median on Lake Susan Drive which we talked about. Kind of eliminates pretty much of the access to this 7 or 8 acre piece here. And I have a concern about that. And Kate and I have, and my two sons who plan on developing this propelty. It's going to be a family development. It's been a family farm. It's going to be a family development. Neal has been in construction for many years now. Our house on Lake 4 Planning Commission Meeting - January 4,2005 Susan was the first house he built on his own. Before that he was working for some other developers. But that was the first house he built on his own and he's been building homes ever since that time and that's 21-22 years ago that he built our house. So anyway, I'm just saying this so you don't have to worry that he's. Sacchet: He knows what he's doing. Al Klingelhutz: He knows what he's doing, let's put it that way. But I do feel that there should be an access to this property somewhere on Lake Susan Drive. It could be up on this end. I know they don't want to go any closer than 600 feet from a major intersection so it'd have to be up here quite a ways, and I think there wouldn't be any problem with that.. . family development because they would like to have access to that same Lake Susan Drive at some point because they're going to have a small development on the north side of that, on Lake Susan Drive. That's what I was complaining about...we've known this is going to happen for a long time. As the zoning's been there for this property and for the rest of my property plus the piece on the east side of the road. It's been pretty well publicized that some of these things are going to actually happen in this area. So that is my, our main concern is the fact that we sure would like an access to Lake Susan Drive. Sacchet: Thank you. Al Klingelhutz: That isn't to say we're going to go out through Chan Hills but we thought this way we could get onto 101, in and out. Thank you. Sacchet: Thank you very much. Slagle: Quick question if I may to staff. Al Klingelhutz: Any questions? Sacchet: For staff. Slagle; I'm just curious is, Kate why wouldn't we, to Mr. Klingelhutz' property, access it off the cul-de-sac to 101 ? Áanenson: We could come off this way, but you know again when you're putting additional trips on the backs of these homes, it'd be nice if we didn't have to do that. Because then you could actually build a buffer along here. If you follow what I'm saying there. That'd be the best. But that may not happen. You know certainly, when this is a private development, a PUD. A plivate street. Typically we don't connect two specific, so you know, can we force it to be a public street, so we're really trying to work with both properties together to make it work the best for the layout, but again then you're just forcing more trips around. Could it happen that way? Yeah, but. Slagle: Do you have a preference Mr. Klingelhutz? 5 Planning Commission Meeting - January 4, 2005 Al Klingelhutz: Do we have apartments? Slagle: No a preference as to, could you access? Al Klingelhutz: I would prefer if we could get right onto Lake Susan Drive and circle up to Lake Susan Drive here and then come out to get over to the new 101. Slagle: Alright. Sacchet: And that's somewhat in line with what you presented in the beginning, isn't it? Aanenson: Yep. That's what we're working on. Sacchet: Okay, Al Klingelhutz: Keep that in mind because it really is a big preference. Sacchet: And it looks like staff is already pursuing that from their angle as well. Thank you. Anybody else wants to speak up to this item, Seeing nobody, I'm going to close the public hearing. Bring it back to the commission for comments, discussion. Want to start this item? Lillehaug: Sure. I'll rattle mine off. It's a concept PUD, I do want to make a note that in the developer's letter to us they indicate heights of buildings and some of the parameters that at this point I don't plan on reviewing and I expect them not to hold us to those elevations. Work with staff on developing the PUD to make sure it fits. So I just want to make sure that you have those parameters in there but we shouldn't be adhering to them at this point. Number one comment, and this is my major comment is, the two north parcels there and the Lake Susan Hills Drive. I've expressed my concerns previously regarding the cut through traffic and I know staff's aware of that but we really need to get a handle on. Not the traffic that's being generated from these two north parcels but the potential for all the cut through traffic that can go through on Lake Susan Drive because I see that as a very large potential, and if I live on Lake Susan Hills Drive, it's a very direct connect without having to go through the numerous signals and I would use that, so it's, I have great concerns there so we really need to take a look at doing something there and making sure that we're not introducing cut through traffic so extreme that everyone of them residents are going to be very upset with what happened here. The parcelS to the north, somehow you know it split off from the parcel across from Lake Susan Drive to the south. It really needs to be worked in with something to the north, and I'm assuming that they have similar zoning or guidances. Okay, good. Berming. We talked, staff talks about landscaping and screening but I want to make sure that we're including berming in addition to landscaping as screening. Traffic study, reiterate that. Be very clear that I would like to see a traffic study for the Lake Susan Drive connection as well the other road through the southerly site. And then definitely it needs, this site needs to work with the developer on the Klingelhutz property and access to the property to the north there and I think I have all my comments. 6 Planning Commission Meeting - January 4,2005 Sacchet: Good comments. Thanks Steve. Dan, anything to add? Keefe: My only comment would be, at least from where I sit, it seems like the developer's really doing a nice job of kind of engaging with the city and everybody else and I commend them on that and that's it. Sacchet: Thank you. Kurt. Papke: Nothing to add. Sacchet: Rich. Yeah, I think everybody's expressed very clearly. I mean it looks like, it's very encouraging that the direction that staff is exploring matches what the concern is from the Klingelhutz property to the north. To line up that access and I support it. I think we're on a good track with it, With that I'd like to have a motion. Papke: I'll make a motion that the Planning Commission recommends, approves the concept PUD with the recommendations as outlined in the staff report. Sacchet: We have a motion. Is there a second? Lillehaug: Second. Sacchet: Are there any friendly amendments? Lillehaug: The amendments as I indicated in my comments. Sacchet: Okay. Is that acceptable? Papke: Acceptable. Papke moved, Lillehaug seconded that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the concept PUD Planning Case No. 05-01, Sand Companies, Inc., with the recommendations as outlined in the staff report and Commissioner Lillehaug's comments. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to O. 7 ~E"'\~tlEISOJ:,1& l ¡:; ~ ~ '\ ,p 1). OFT¡¡'p.~'" Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan District Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville MN 55113-3174 REceIVED JAN 1 4 2005 CITY OF CHANHASSEN January 10,2005 Kate Aanenson City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 SUBJECT: Sand Companies Concept Planned Unit Development Mn/DOT Review S04-104 Northwest Comer of Re-Aligned TH 101 and Lyman Boulevard (CSAR 18) Chanhassen, Carver County Control Section 1009 Dear Ms Aanenson: The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnlDOT) has reviewed the above referenced site plan in compliance with Minnesota Statute 505.03, subdivision 2, Plats. Before any further development, please address the following issues: · These preliminary layouts do not show any proposed intersection design or relationship to proposed TH 101 ramp/loop design. We need geometric plans and dimensions of this development in relation to Mn/DOT's ramps and loops in order to review this project in full. Please contact Lynn Clarkowski, Area Engineer, at (651) 634-2103, ør ' Ivnn,clarkowski@dot.state.mn.us if you have any questions about this information request. · For the northerly site (Lake Susan Drive), the driveways off Lake Susan Drive should be opposite from each other and as far from TH 10 1 as possible, at the minimum 660 feet from TH 101. For the southerly site (Lyman Blvd), there must be a public street connection from TH 101 all the way to Lyman Blvd, for example, no dead ends, and it must have at least three lanes of approach (right, through, and left) to TH 101. A right turn lane and a left turn lane are required on TH 101 for this new street which must be aligned properly opposite Mn/DOT's ramps. Contact Lars Impola, Traffic Studies Engineer, Mn/DOT, at 651-634-2379 or lars,impola@dot.state.mn.us if you have any questions about these issues. · More information is needed to determine whether a Mn/DOT drainage permit will be required for this project. Current drainage rates to MnlDOT right of way must be maintained and applications for a drainage permit should include hydrologic computations for 10 and 100 year storms, drainage area maps and any other relevant information for pre- and post- construction conditions. Any wetland impacts that this development creates will need to be mitigated by the City or the developer. Please contact Martin Korthank at Mn/DOTWater Resources Engineering (651.634.2077) or (martin.korthank(â),dot.state.mn.us) with any questions regarding drainage permits. An equal opportunity employer · As a reminder, Lyman Boulevard is County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 18. Any work on a CSAH route must meet State Aid rules and policies. The County must review any changes to its County State Aid Highway system so that they stay within its system limitations. You may obtain additional information regarding State Aid rules and policies in any of the following ways: ~ http://www.dot.state.mn.us/stateaid/ shows or has links to the applicable forms and the Mn/DOT State Aid Manual. ' ~ Refer to the Mn/DOT State Aid Manual, Chapter 5-892.200 for information regarding standards and policies. ~ Please go to http://www.revisor.1eg.state.mn.us/arule/8820/ for information regarding State Aid Operations Rules Chapter 8820. ~ For driveway standards, the designer is directed to refer to the Mn/DOT Road Design Manual (English) Table 5-3.04A and Figure 5-3.04A for guidance and policies. Please contact Jim Deeny in our State Aid section at (651) 582-1389 with any additional questions. · Mn/DOT's policy is to assist local governments in promoting compatibility between land use and highways. Residential uses located adjacent to highways often result in complaints about traffic noise. Traffic noise from this highway could exceed noise standards established by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the U.S. Department of Transportation. Minnesota Rule 7030.0030 states that municipalities are responsible for taking all reasonable measures to prevent land use activities listed in the MPCA's Noise Area Classification (NAC) where the establishment of the land use would result in violations of established noise standards. Mn/DOT policy regarding development adjacent to existing highways prohibits the expenditure of highway funds for noise mitigation measures in such areas. The project proposer should assess the noise situation and take the action deemed necessary to minimize the impact of any highway noise. If you have any questions regarding Mn/DOT's noise policy please contact Peter Wasko in our Design section at (651) 582-1293. · Any use of or work within Mn/DOT right of way requires a permit. Permit forms are available from Mn/DOT's utility website at www.dot.state.mn.us/tecsup/utility . Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Keith Van Wagner (651-582-1443), or Buck Craig (651-582-1447) of MnDOT's Metro Permits Section. · As a reminder, please address an initial future correspondence for development activity such as plats and site plans to: Development Reviews Coordinator Mn/DOT - Metro Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three (3) complete copies of plats and two (2) copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to provide three (3) copies of a plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will make a submittal incomplete and delay Mn/DOT's review and response to development proposals. We appreciate your anticipated cooperation in providing the necessary number of copies, as this will prevent us from having to delay and/or return incomplete submittals. ~ · As our request, please send an electronic .pdffile copy of your final plan submittal for our record keeping purposes to mary.jackson@dot.state.mn.us. Please refer to Mn/DOT Review # S04-104 when emailing the .pdf file. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. If you have any questions concerning this review, please contact me at (651) 582-1724 or Tod Sherman at (651) 582-1548. Sincerely, ~ ~ i, ~ (MIYL- Mary E. Jacton ¡ Intermediate Planner Copy: Roger Gustafson, Carver County Engineer Richard A. Hennings, Sand Companies, Inc. \J » 7D n 111 I (j) '::J:!:: -fit- ::J:!:: Ul (j) \) » r f" o o Q /.¡- / I \J 7D 111 I ~ Z » ~ (j) --\ 111 s;: -< o C --\ '" --" ~ Nt.n --. "HI' '" N- z ~ ",(J>(J> QQ~ qqg ~~a ~~ "'''' ;ON "'- N ... '" o HIGHWAY # 10 I R,O.W_ . -1 -1 >- 00" '" '< >- 1?- Z~ r :I;::: <:: Orn - ;:::z z ",,,, G> (J>:I C ° '" ;::: '" '" (J> (J> >- >->- () () () ~ ~~ (J> U\ U\ II " - "" - ;þþ w ~~ '" '" '" err ~ ~:! '" U\ >- () ~ '\ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ß.E~ R,O.w, LINES -\- ---------- --- -- --___O_RlGINALR'-O.W, LINE.:? ~~ -0 0 000 ~""J:"'-I 0 !¡ffi~ zg~~ffi \'>'< . :;0 I m 0 ~~! g5~}~ ~~ ~. ~ ÇI'J . m » < 0 ~~ ~~~~~ 0 -., ",- ",j "4. c r ~~ ~t§~. :;'a::t ~, » z m ~~~~~ þ 0 1n ~ R ~..~~ ~ ' i' $: I $: (J) z r ~~~~ã & CJ ::¡ I Z » 0 -0 » ,.,., -< ~~~Bi~"'! ~ ~ 0 (j) ,. ~~ ~~ã~ U> n JJQ » » z m ~i~~ ~ ~f "ì:j ~;i (j) -0 ::mom Z m" ~ § !2!~g~ ;!! 0.0 <><>~"''''~"''''N m $: Z 0 ~~~~ 2> mX ~~~~~~~1 ~. ~ Z ~ -þ I~;I 2 <2 § § ~.~ ~ g ~ ~. (j) m m 2 '" mX Z 0"" ..~' "';:¡ ~'~~ =¡ $: Z (J) Q = (f) g g '1 i ~ ~~~~ & <=> (f) m z - .f'oo m ~ ~ ' . ;:~ ." Z ... ~ 111111111111111161 m f\ i U IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIID ~ ' \ \tl~;lL~::~~~~~~~~+ ~.~~~\ -------"-~--- c --,;r-~rì \\ " r ol ==> I ~ \ ~ ~~ ~_~:- II ~ ~ \ \ ~ or;¡ ~ :î 0 X ) ~ ~~ '----- I ~ - f ~ D ~ \;: " =~ ¡ ~ +- - - - - - - --- - -- - - - - - - - - -- - -- - - ------+-j.". \ "" \ \ "" ,I I I , , "" , , "" " ~ "" G'~ ,"í:- , "YJ- ""~ , / , <? "", fa , .~ "". , "" u"" z <0'" ~ 0>' þþ 0" "''''''' ~~ 99~ ~~ qQþ ",@o "-< ¡¡;::r~ Þ ,_ "'~ ~~ 00 ",;;: 0", "'''' 'j;'U> ~i\) i\) ~ '" 0 ~ ~ en -1 I I' I , þ z o ~ , , "" ~ :;: » z OJ a c , n1 < » 7U o I I L__ I I I ---- , I' I "" I \ / , / '\ ~ .- n I ~ - r, I + ~ ,- HIGHWAY # I 0 i R.OW. \J IJ ~@ » 7U 7U n1 () ,. n1 s:: ,. - (j) z ~ » (j.) ~ -f\\- (j) ~ --\ ..þ,.. n1 ,. lJ1 2( () þ 0 , ~ C --\ 0 0 Q \ \ \ \ \ \ INTERSECTION 0 >0 o. mo 0 -u 0 ~~ ~~ I ~~ [~~. ;0 m 0 '" o. Þ 0 I ;:5 §~ z 0 ::¡ S.t:: C)~ l.o.> m » < 0 ~, :1~ ~ -< c ;J ~~ U> fTl :nO ~~~~~ ~ f~ » z m $: en Ç) m" Q~"~~"'~ S I (f) ~~ m r z ()o ~~B~.?i'O~ I » "U » ~i " mI : Z 0 !¿t ç -þ § ~~~~~~ , , 0 (J) , , "'" <z » » z "0 ~g z mI ~~~M~~~ ~Q ~ (J) "U 8" i~ z N Oþ m Z 0 z = U> ~~ ~¿.~~~ N z $: G> = W ~--~. ~~~ ~ m~ '" .þ. m (J) - m m 8~ m z §fi " !'>:-> 't ::¡ S Z (f) ... . g 8 Z ~~ ~ ~ m - " "