3. 2020 Comprehensive Plan
690Ciry Center Drive, POBox 147 FROM:
ChanhaiSen, Minnesota 55317
Phone 612.937.1900 DATE:
General Fax 612.937.5739
Engineering Fax 612.937.9152 SUBJ:
Public Safery Fax 6129342524
Wéb ll'lI'll',ci.r!h¡¡¡hrrssen./lJIl.1IS
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
-,
:)/
-
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Don Ashworth, City Manager
Kate Aanenson, AICP, Planning Director
June 24,1998
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Implications
Background
On June 17, 1998, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the draft of
the Comprehensive Plan. The planning commission recommended tabling
action until the city council and the commission could hold a work session to
discuss the implications of the proposed land uses. More specifically, the amount
of commercial/office/industrial zoning that was raised by the School District 112,
Vemelle Clayton and Brad Johnson.
Analysis
To understand how the land use recommendations were derived, you have to go
back to the Hwy. 5 Corridor Study and the Bluff Creek Management Plan. Both
of these studies were created by the city council including a task force with a
purpose of examining land uses in the two study areas (1995 Study Area). Both of
these studies were part of a larger public process with input from property owners
through the land use recommendation. The Hwy. 5 Corridor Study was
completed in 1995 and the Bluff Creek Study was completed in 1996. Both of the
studies were the catalysis for the beginning of the comprehensive plan study. As
staff indicated at the beginning of the comp plan study in May of 1997, because
the land use recommendations had been resolved earlier, the use of GIS allowed
more precise data collection i.e. traffic projection, households, etc.
Questions were raised at the planning commission meeting regarding the amount
of commercial/industrial/office. The recommendations remain the same as
proposed in the two studies and the principles of a downtown core center. Staff
believes the land use recommendation reflects the communities goals and are well
conceived. Staffhas indicated a part of the mixed use and POO that support
commercial could be permitted but that would be applied on a case by case basis
to ensure that the proposal meet the city's goals. Staff has prepared a comparison
The City ofChanhassen. A growing commlilziry with clean lakes, qualiry schoob, a charming dowlltown, thriving businesses. and beautifùl parks. A great plare 10 lit,e, ",ark, and play.
Mr. Don Ashworth
June 24, 1998
Page 2
of the amount of commercial/industrial with the cities of Chaska and Victoria. Chanhassen
compares very favorably with Chaska. Victoria has only 1 % commercial/industrial projected by
the year 2020.
The School District 112 was concerned with the amount of commercial/office but upon
examination of the school district in Chanhassen, there will be a population base of25,549, a
household base of9,21O with 12,975 jobs in the 112 District. This compares very favorably with
the Chaska ratios. In the Minnetonka School District 276 in the year 2020 there will be 10,513
people with 3,790 households with only 525 jobs in this district.
The school district also raised the issue of providing additional school sites (see letter dated June
17,1998). In earlier conversations with the school district, they indicated that there would not be
another school located in the city ofChanhassen. There are locations that could be designated
for a school site but it must be kept in mind that unless property is owned by the city or the
school district, it cannot be held out from development because that would be a taking. If the
council and commission would like to provide for additional school sites, staffhas some site
recommendations. The fmancing for acquisition should also be placed in the capital investment
plan.
Recommendation
Staff will be prepared to discuss the attached data. The purpose of the meeting is to ensure the
council and the planning commission understand the implièations of the proposed
recommendations.
**Please bring your draft copy of the comprehensive plan
". "
g:\plan\ka\worksession6-29.doc
co
-6
¡¡;
:;¡.
~
-0
o
-0
J:
:I:
'"
::>
0-
m
3
?!-
~
'"
o
~
o
!2.
0-
~
::I.
¡¡
~
r-
(')
:I:
6;
~
¡¡::
Z
~ I
~
(')
~
o
."
(')
:I:
»
Z
~
en
en
m
z
... ... ~
CD 0 CD
ëo :.. -."
0 '" ...
CD 01 Co>
~ ... ~
-oJ '"
tõ ëo -."
~ ""
0 en
Co> "" ... ~
... ... 0
œ :.. Ì\>
~ en
01
Co> "" ... ~
en 01 0
è:> "* Ù1
en ...
"" Co>
en Co> 5'> ~
..... -." ...
CD -oJ 0
0 01 01
'" en Co> ~
ëo t ~
...
0 0 0
... ~
... -oJ Co>
ë.> -." .....
Co> Co> 0
0 0 0
... ®
Co> '" Co>
è:> Ì\> .....
0 ... '"
0 0 0
CD CD ~
-." :.. .þ.
0 -oJ Co>
0 0 0
... ... ~
... 0
~ ~ ~
0 en
... ... ~
"" ...
ë.> ~ g¡
g¡ ...
... ... ~
Co> ""
Ù1 ëo ~
0 ~
0
-0
o
-0
c:
~
Õ
z
:I:
o
c:
en
m
:I:
o
r-
o
en
. ... _~ 7'D
o
-0
c:
~
Õ
Z
:I:
o
c:
en
Z
G>
»
Z
o
m
¡¡::
-0
§
¡¡::
m
z
-I
-0
:II
e
m
~
Õ
z
en
m
¡¡::
-0
r-
Q
¡¡::
m
z
-I
en
N
~
CD
2020 Land Use Percentages
Land Use
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Public Semi-Public
Parks Open Space
Undevelocable
Total
Chanhassen
57-
2
10
8
12
~
32
. includes 15% large lot residential and ROW
'-includes only lakes and rivers
Chaska
37
1
12
3
21
26
100
Victoria
54
0.1
1
1
21
2a
100.1
Source Chaska, Chanhassen, Victoria 2020 Comprehensive plan updates
-
c
..
e
>-
°
ë.
e
w
..,
c
..
In
:2
.- °
".I:.
§ ~
0::>
CJo",
c:J:CI>
CO ...J.
.. C '¡:
=00-
0-4
Q."
0-
~ '"
-Q.
.. °
:Eo.
-
°
In
1ñ
..
"
..
~
°
u..
e
.::
!
.E
0°0°0
(\Jaooo
o O~oC\l~o
C\I~C\Î~":
_0
c~
..0
e'"
>-
,go
Q.o
eO
w'"
000
oLl}oo
C\I~(Ø ~o
o ~ C\J CD
~~~
o 0"''''........
~00"'~1t>
~ .,.:C\I ui'llt
000
OLOOa
C\lC\lcq,C\I
cö"':"""""
~
o~g~M
mcoU')CX)LD
..- ~"':r-:<O
00
",0
o~
",,,,
~
08
fI)5? 1.0
~..'" a)
°
.I:.
~8 8
::>0 '"
oC\! W
:I:
0'"
"'~
",0
~.£
0'"
00.....
",0
~Ñ
00
"'~
0.£
"'",
08
c~ ~
° '"
..
.!!!o8
::>0",
Q.o .
0'" 00
0. ~
o~
~ ,.....~
~~
~
o~
00'"
",,,,
~<JS
00
00
qo
o .
~'"
00
00
00
cõC\Ï
00
0'"
0'"
cD"':
"'",
~'"
"l.....
...
"'.....
0",
0....
'"
00
0",
q.....
~r-:
00
0",
~...
~ui
8g
......'"
~c?
c
Q)
~ .5
os ¡. os os
J:: c:':;¿"-
c: i tn 0
os~os..,
...c:........c: .v
CJ g,CJ:>
0000
0000
U')occ
<JS<JSo<'i
U')Il)COU')
0000
0000
001.O1.l)
Mc?oS"':
Lt)U')It)Ll}
0000
0000
0000
cÞcDcDo)
-.::r'lltLl).q-
1.1)<0"1:1"(")
0>(")(")0
OL()Ll)..-
<JS.ri.£aS
C")C?"CtC")
Ii;
......0)..-(\1
0.....<0'-
COCOON
C\ÏmcDO
,.........C")C\I
0000
0000
o,....Lt)1l)
côC\Î"-"""':
C\lC\lC\lC")
0000
0000
&.nOMa
C'iC\Î"':cõ
(\INNC\I
0000
0000
U')vOU')
0":"":('1)
"''''''''''
~..........o~
00"''''
"'00'"
~côma5
,...,......... ......
C")r--....-......
CX)<DCDCD
Cl')CJ:!..~~",
Lri'C\I,....o
~ ~ ~
¡!J...
",'"
.'"
::Ñ
0000
0000
Ll)L()OO
a>ômÑ
1l)1J').q-"""
0000
0000
1.01.1)1.01.0
<JS 0 as"':
1.01.0-.::1'<0
0000
0000
Ll)OIl)IJ')
criC\ir:C\i
Ll)U'),¢<D
.....000)
~..........oo
C")MOa)
a;a5cDo
"'......It>
C")C")('I')Ll}
coco.....,....
C\lCDOCD
cD cD cD"":
......C")vC")
Q)
'¡::
.~ ...c:
0. '5
c: ctt ctt 0
Q)-:s.5 ~
iB::æiB¡¡:
",It>
¡::I;~
cõ"":
2 Overview - Land Use
TABLE 3
EXISTING LAND USE
JANUARY I, 1998
VICTORIA REMAINING ANNEX. TOTAL
LAND USE AC. SO. MI. % AC. SO. MI. % AC. SO. MI. %
F ARM-AGRICULTURE 1226.0 1.9 22 6,923.6 10.8 59 8,149.6 12.7 47
RESIDENTIAL
- Low Density 977.0 1.5 18 265.8 0.4 2 1,242.8 1.9 7
- Mediwn Density 20,9 <0.1 0 20.9 <0.1 0
- High Density 47.1 0.1 I 47.1 0.1 0
COMMERCIAL
. Retail-Service 8.3 <0.1 0 8.3 <0,1 0
. Office 3.5 <0,1 0 3.5 <0,1 0
GENERAL INDUSTRIAL
- General Industrial 61.0 0.1 26.5 <0.1 0 87.5 0.1
PARK AND OPEN SPACE
- Park Reserve 1,137.5 1.8 21 1,993.7 3.1 17 3,131.2 4.9 18
. City Park 117.3 0,2 2 6.7 <0.1 0 124.0 0.2 I
-Other 144.5 0,22 3 2.3 <0.1 0 146.8 0.2 I
OTHER PUB. & SEMI.PUB,
- Conummity Facilities 4.4 <0.1 0 32.1 <0.1 0 36.5 0.1 0
· Institutional 28.4 <0.1 I 109.3 0.2 I 137.7 0,2 I
-Other 0,8 <0.1 0 0.8 <0,1 0
RIGHTS-OF. WAY
· Railroods 40.7 0.1 38,9 0.1 0 79.6 0.1 0
- Transmission Line (14,145) (14,145)
· Pipe Line (9,990) (13,965) (23,955)
- State Highways 113.4 0.2 2 51.0 0.1 0 164.4 0.3 0
- COWJty Roods 58.6 0.1 I 63.6 0,1 I 122.2 0.2 I
· City Streets 152.3 0.2 3 126,0 0.2 I 278.3 0.4 2
VACANT 182.5 0,3 3 42.5 0.1 0 225.0 0.4 I
WATER 1,159.0 1.8 21 1,953.0 3.1 17 3,112.0 4.9 18
TOTALS 5,483.2 8,6 100 11,635.0 18.2 100 17,118.2 26.7 100
Note: Items shown in parentheses are in lineal feet,
. All areas were calculated by scaling tom the 1997 Existing Land Use Map except water, \>hich was obtained tom
the DNR The area in Carver Park was obtained tom staff at the Lowry Natw'e Center.
Sources: Thibault Associates 1997 Existing Land Use Survey, City Records, DNR, Hennepin COWIty Parks
VICTORIA, MINNESOTA
April 23, 1998
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1998-2020
Page 12
,
..
School
District
m
I
Business Office
110600 Village Road
Chaska, Minnesota 55318
612/368-3620
June 17, 1998
City of Chanhassen
Planning Commission
Dear Commissioners,
The School Board ofIndependent School District 112 is appreciative ofthe Chanhassen
Comprehensive Plan being reviewed prior to submission to the Chanhassen City Council.
Strategic planning for the growth needs of an expanding demographic base is extremely ..' ,
important. With land supply being the one constant in a community poised for rapid growth, all
concerned governmental entities need to collaboratively address future needs. Assuming a
majority of the 7,200 households and 16,600 person projected increase is within ISD 112
boundaries, ISD I 12 will require substantial new school building space and new acreage, A
secondary school and two elementary schools may be required within Chanhassen City
boundaries by the year 2020. This would require between minimum 160 acres at current
standards (80 acre secondary site, 40 acre per elementary site).
The School District recommends future school sites be identified and planned for in
Chanhassen's Comprehensive Plan,
Minnesota school finance formula, established by the Legislature, provides a basic foundation
formula on a per pupil basis. This basic formula has equalization state aid built into
appropriations so that students across the state are provided adequate and equal access to
education. The formula, however, does not allow for adequate equalization state aid when
District's levy against local property to pay long term debt and excess operational expenses.
Districts that can spread the property tax levy against high local property wealth (market value or
tax capacity), consistently pass bond or levy referendums at a higher amount and frequency than
property poor districts, ISD 112 is a property poor district that would benefit from addition
commercial and industrial tax base comparative to household residences,
The School District recommends future commercial and industrial land use be planned in the
City of Chanhassen to decrease future tax rates on household residences.
In summary the School Board of Independent School District I 12 appreciates a collaborative
effort of all citizens and governmental entities in addressing the long-range mission of educating
our society's most precious resource, the youth of tomorrow!
Sincerely,
1jffi¡~
Kelly Von De Bur
School Board Chairperson
cc: Chanhassen Mayor, Director, City Council
Serving the communities of eastern Carver County through equal opportunity in employment and education.
North Central Accredited
JUN 18 98 THU 16:50
Cl¿;,~~~
P.12I1
Existing Land Use (in acres)
TOTAL ACREAGE WITHIN THE CURRENT URBAN SERVICE AREA 7,238
Existing land uses within the urban service area 4,870
Single·family residential (including mobile home parks) .J,,646
Multifamily residential 141
Commercial 121
Industrial 695
Public and semipublic (including churches) 309
I' Airports 0
Parks and recreation (including cemeteries) 891
Active Parks 207
Golf Courses (Hazeltine, Chaska Town Course, Par 30) 527
Hazeltine National Golf Course· expansion 157
Roadways and Railroads (including arterials, collectors, 212 R-O-W) 504
T,H. 212 right-of-way 197
Open Water (not including Lake Bavaria) 366
Land within the urban service area that is restricted for development 1,336
Wetlands, bluffs/slopes, passive parks and trails 1,336
Vacant developable land within the current urban service area (restricted) 1,032
Single-family residential 555
Multifamily residential 181
Commercial 135
Industrial 96
Public and semipublic 0
Rural 65
TOTAL LAND ACREAGE OUTSIDE THE CURRENT URBAN SERVICE AREA 2,070
Existing land uses outside the urban service area 1,360
Single-family residential 86
Rural estates 1,047
Parks 120
Open Water (Lake Bavaria) 107
Vacaut developable land outside the urban service area (not restricted) 710
Single· family residential 279
Rural estates 86
Commerical/industrial 345
Agriculture 0
TOTAL LAND AREA OF COMMUNITY 9,308
,Ii-At
.\',1
(;:pnt,..mhl"r 1 Q97
Tn ";-:;,,, ,..,
S:IWORKISUPPOR1\PSMITH\PROJECTSILAND· TBL.SAM Post.1t" Fax Note 7671
J
r.., E(CelSlor
\
SChOOl
District
02
- -
rJ
"
T
45
50
. .
::;:! Bluff Creek
--,...,
U Chanh:lSsen
,I Ch:1Ska
~
~E.:l.'itt:ni()n
_ Jonathan
1. Bluff Creek EIemen1aIy School
2300 Coulter Blvd. Chamassen, !.iN 55317
470-6915 '
2. ClIIII t ¡¡ I 8emeI ,III ~ SchocI
7600 Laredo, Ct'amassen, !.iN 55317
934·5246
3. CI1ISIca EIemeI,III ~ SchocI
1800 Chestnut, Chasl<a,!.iN 55318
448-8706
4 & 5 Ct'8sIca YddIe School
1600 Park Ridge, Chaska, !.iN 55318
448-8700
6. Carver Scott Educadonal CooperatIve
401 East ~th Street. Ct'aska,!.iN 55318
7. East U,,*," E3emetllll~ Sd1DoI
15655 County Road 43, CaNer, !.iN 55315
448·4488
8. Ear1y Childhood ~ntar/DlsIr1ct 0ftk:8
11 0600 Villaçe Road, Ct'asl<a, !.iN 55318
368·3101 (ECC) 368-3620 (Cis!. Olllee)
9. JonaIl1an EJemenlary Sd1DoI
110300 Jonalhan Blvd.. Chaska, MN 55318
443·3720
10. Chaska HIgh SchocI
545 Pioneer Trail, Chaska, MN 55318
361 ·5470