Loading...
3. TH 101 Upgrade Discussion CITY OF CBANHASSEN 690 City Ctnter Drive, PO Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Phone 612.937.1900 General Fax 612.937.5739 Engineering Fax 612.937.9152 Pubhc Safety Fax 612.934.2524 Wlb www.â.chanhassen.mn.us ~ - MEMORANDUM TO: Scott Botcher, City Manager ,Llk. Anita L. Benson, City Engineer WV FROM: DATE: December 16, 1999 SUBJ: Highway 101 Update - Project No. 97-12 The City Council has indicated their desire to construct a trail along Highway 101 as soon as possible. This trail would be constructed separately from the proposed Highway 101 reconstruction project which currently is programmed for 2004 tumback funding. However, questions regarding use of what is now MnDOT right-of-way slated to become Carver County right-of-way with the jurisdictional tumback of Highway 101 and the jurisdictional agencies' willingness to allow construction of a trail prior to the Highway 101 roadway reconstruction project need to be answered. Additionally, in question is the commitment of funding for the Highway 101 reconstruction project by MnDOT for 2004. The jurisdictional authorities' willingness to allow construction of any improvements within the Highway 101 right-of-way is unlikely due to the pending road construction project. However, any permit for use of Highway 101 right-of- way would not be considered until such time as plans and specifications are complete and available for the jurisdictional agencies' review. However, based upon my understanding of the issues regarding the tumback of Highway 101 and proposed reconstruction project, I believe it is unlikely that such a permit would be issued unless the proposed trail were to be constructed in such a manner as to provide for the future roadway project. Obviously, the City could challenge the jurisdictional authorities' right to restrict construction of a trail in the right-of-way and Mr. Roger Knutson will be providing the Council additional information regarding the legal implications of such an action. This legal opinion will be emailed to Council members on Friday, December 17, 1999. I have spoken with Mr. Bob Brown, MnDOT Metro Division State Aid Engineer, regarding the difficulties in proceeding with the Highway 101 project process without having a commitment as to when funding will be available from MnDOT for this project. Mr. Brown stated as did Jim Grube at the work session on December 6, 1999, that although this project is slated for 2004, additional tumback funding has become available in the 8-county metro area for 2002, 2003 and 2004 in the amounts of$5 million, $12 million and $15 million, respectively. MnDOT and the Metro County Transportation Representatives will be meeting to discuss and prioritize what projects this additional funding will be dedicated to. Additionally, Mr. Brown informed me that his office is in the process of preparing a five-year CIP for tumback projects which is anticipated to be completed by mid February. This is significant as previously MnDOT was not able to prepare a five- The Cirv of Chanhass",. A trOwin! communirv with clean /¡¡kes. aua/irv schoob, a charminv downtown. thrivinv businesses. and beauti/ùl parks. A mat ./¡¡ce to live. work. and ./¡¡v. 'ti Scott Botcher Highway 101 Update December 16, 1999 Page 2 year CIP which commits funding for specific projects. Mr. Brown indicated MnDOT is willing to enter into an agreement with the agencies involved for funding for the Highway 101 construction project in 2002 and 2003 pending the project receiving favorable ranking in the prioritization of the additional funding by the Metro Transportation Representatives and approval ofthe five-year CIP in February. Such an agreement based on the current timeline for preparation of the five-year CIP could be available for the counties to review in March of 2000. Therefore, it is likely that by fall of 2000 the agreement could be fully executed. The commitment of funding in MnDOT's five-year CIP which is expected to be completed by mid February for the Highway 101 reconstruction project in 2002 and 2003 and subsequent agreement which MnDOT has expressed an interest in entering into with the agencies involved guaranteeing this funding for those years is a significant goal to work towards. However, in the interim it is important to continue with the public process for the Highway 101 reconstruction project in order to assure adequate time is allowed for public involvement, environmental studies, and preparation of plans and specifications to deliver a construction project in 2002. The commitment of funding in 2002 will require an agreement on behalf of all agencies to proceed with construction of a project in 2002 as there are other projects competing for funding. C: Bob Brown, MnDOT Metro Division State Aid Engineer Roger Gustafson, Carver County Engineer Jim Grube, Hennepin County Engineer Gene Dietz, Eden Prairie Public Works Director Tim Phenow, SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Charles Folch, Director of Public Works Operations g:\eng\Public\97-t2\update memo I.doc CITY OF CBANHASSEN 690 City Center Drive, PO Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Phone 612.937.1900 General Fax 612.937.5739 Engineering Fax 612.937.9152 Public Safety Fax 612.934.2524 web www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Scott Botcher, City Manager Anita L. Benson, City Engineer ~ December 7, 1999 FROM: DATE: SUBJ: Highway 101 Work Session Minutes from December 6, 1999 The discussion regarding the Highway 101 improvement project began with the City Engineer providing Council members with preliminary cost estimates for construction of a trail along Highway 101. These cost estimates depicted the total City cost for a trail constructed within the existing right-of-way of $750,000, a trail which would accommodate a future Highway 101 roadway reconstruction project at a cost of$2,615,000, and for the construction of the trail with the tumback roadway reconstruction project at no cost to the City. Staff was directed to verify whether or not tumback funding would cover the entire cost of the trail. Roger Gustafson, Carver County Public Works Director, provided the City Council with information regarding Carver County's plans for the 101 corridor as a regional trail. Mr. Gustafson further communicated the tumback agreement status with the Minnesota Department of Transportation has been limited to the segment of Highway 101 north of Highway 5 for purposes of moving a project forward for this segment. Negotiations for a tumback agreement for Highway 101 south of Highway 5 will occur separately. It was communicated that approval of the tumback agreement by MnDOT and Carver County would likely occur upon concept approval of a roadway section by the four agencies involved. Jim Grube, Hennepin County Transportation Director, provided an update on the tumback funding for this project. Currently, this project is slated for 2004; however, since the legislature ultimately sets funding levels for all transportation projects funded through the State of Minnesota, this date can not be assured until the Minnesota state budget is approved. Mr. Grube informed the Council that in the eight-county metro area additional funding has become available for 2002, 2003 and 2004 in the amounts of$5 million, $12 million and $15 million, respectively. The metro county transportation representatives will be meeting to discuss and prioritize what projects this additional funding should be utilized on. In response to the question of what if a tumback agreement does not occur with Carver County for transferring jurisdictional authority for the road from MnDOT to the County, Mr. Grube indicated that MnDOT would likely rescind the Hennepin County tumback agreement and Highway 101 would remain a temporary trunk highway under the jurisdiction of the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Councilman Senn presented a "what if' scenario in which a tumback agreement is executed for the portion ofthe roadway within Carver T/" Cirv ofChanhassen. A trOwinfCommunirv with clean /¡¡kes, qualitv schoo/i. a charminv downtown. thrivinv businesses. and beauti/ùl parks. A mat ,/¡¡ce to liv,. work. and ,/¡¡v. I" .' Scott Botcher December 7, 1999 Page 2 County and resurfacing of the roadway were to occur with the City constructing a trail. Councilman Senn was asked to provide specifics of this scenario in written form for future Council discussion. Mayor Mancino expressed a concern regarding the Highway 101 memorandum responding to issues regarding the response to question number 13 on noise mitigation requirements. No other specific concerns were expressed by Council members regarding this memorandum. The project management team requested Concepts 1, 5 and 6 be eliminated from further consideration as viable options. It was requested that direction be provided to present Concepts 2, 3 and 4 at the neighborhood meetings. However, after a significant amount of discussion, Council provided direction that when neighborhood meetings occur they would like to include Concepts 1,2,3 and 4 as concepts and eliminate Concepts 5 and 6 from further consideration. Additionally, Council members indicated a desire to hold a joint work session with Eden Prairie City Council members upon completion of the neighborhood meetings to discuss/express issues and concerns of both Councils regarding Highway 101. The City Council is currently considering its options for construction of a trail along Highway 101 prior to 2004. Council has indicated a desire to prepare a feasibility study for construction of a trail (minimum impact and at the far limits of the right of way). However, prior to making that decision, staff was directed to provide Council members more information regarding the jurisdictional authorities' willingness to permit the construction of a trail in the existing Highway 101 right of way. Much of the discussion focused on construction of a trail prior to roadway construction and what such a trail might look like. The need to address the poor condition of the roadway surface was recognized by Council members. Ultimately, Council expressed a desire to delay neighborhood meetings until the legal questions regarding construction of a trail prior to the road project are answered. c: Roger Gustafson, Carver County Public Works Director Jim Grube, Hennepin County Transportation Director Gene Dietz, Eden Prairie Public Works Director Tim Phenow, SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Bob Brown, MnDOT Metro Division State Aid Engineer g:\eng\public\97-12\12_6_99 cc worksession minutes.doc