Correspondence
·
Correspondence
Chanhassen Library Quarterly Report, Fourth Quarter 1999.
Memo from Sqt. Dave Potts dated February 24, 2000.
Ad Hoe Committee Meeting Notes for February 16,2000.
Letter to Dale Dawson dated February 25,2000.
Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition Meeting Notice.
Invitation to Carver Soil & Water Conservation District Annual Supervisors Dinner.
League of Minnesota Cities Friday Fax dated March 3, 2000.
Letter to Robin Spevacek dated March 3, 2000.
Memo from Bob Martinka, U.S. Census 2000 Recruiter/Carver County dated March 1,2000.
Letter from Bill Naegele, Lake Minnewashta Fireworks Committee dated February 24, 2000.
Memos from Scott Botcher dated March 1,2000 and Ron Batty, dated February 15, 2000 re: Tax
Increment Financing Legislation.
Suburban Transit Association Legislative Report dated February 25, 2000.
Letter from Bev Stofferahn, Supt., District 112 dated February 24, 2000.
Summons, Robert Rojina vs City ofChanhassen received February 24, 2000.
MCES Planning and Budget Breakfast Meetings memo dated February 29,2000:
Memo from Mike Fahey, Carver County Attorney dated February 28,2000.
Chanhassen Fire Department FirelRescue calls for Week of February 21 - 27, 2000.
Article: Urban Economic Development Threatened by EP A Proposal.
Letter from David Carland, CSM Corporation dated Marcy 7, 2000.
MN Housing Finance Agency, LMI Rule(s) Amendment dated February 21,2000.
Letter with attachment from Conrad Fiskness, Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District
dated March 2, 2000.
c<"': Cö\..\,¡\.'" \
Chanhassen Library Quarterly Report
Fourth Quarter 1999
October 1999
Circulation- 9,419 items checked out
Library users- 5,467
TO: Melissa Brechon,
Chanhassen City Council,·
Planning Commission
FROM: Kathy Perschmann
Branch Librarian
November 1999
Circulation- 8,857 items checked out
Library users- 5,348
Year to date %:
Circulation 7%
111,924 items checked out;
7,719 more than last year.
Reference Questions 6%
Library users 3%
December 1999
Circulation- 7,013 items checked out
Library users- 3,737
A. Public Services: Adult and Children
Internet use has averaged 4-5 per day.
Complaints: patrons would Uke more space to study, ( the library can be very
noisy), and more regular morning hours. ( We are only open Monday, Wednesday
and Saturday in the mornings.) patrons have difficulty getting through to us on the
phone, to renew books. (We call all the people who have books on reseve, which
can take several hours. )
HOURS CHANGE: In September we changed our hours to dose on Friday at 5 PM,
rather than 6 PM. In November all the Jibrarles dosed to allow staff to attend the
funeral of former director Mary Heiges.
B.Public Contact:
CIrculation and reference question statistics continue to Increase. We get many re-
quests for help with school projects, Including the accelerated reader test books.
Some of our more Interesting questions: Somali customs relating to O1IistmaS,
germ theory, cell theory, and evolution for High School sdence papers; school
prayer, causes of sexual attraction, alcohol and teens, folk costumes, time lines and
chronologies, costs of things in the 1930's, food allergies In children, how to copy-
right a song, how to make a working crossbow, literary criticism, Native American
tribes, and all sorts of subjects relating to Spanish speaking countries.
mEN READ WEEK- in OCtober we had a drawing for teens who came Into the
Ubrary, and the Friends of the Library provided the prizes.
LAPSlT STORYllMES: These story times for 6-18 month old children were held on
four Wednesdays In October, and were very popular. We could use more than one
session.
C. Community Involvement:
Volunteer hours: 82.
PROGRAMS: In OCtober we had a program on US savings Bonds; In November we
had a popular talk and book signing by author FaIth Sullivan. (author of cape Ann
and Empress of One) Both were sponsored by the Friends of the Ubrary. Staff re-
deved a lot of praise from those attending the Faith Sullivan program, and they re-
quested that we have more programs. Both of the Library book clubs read her
books and attended the talk.
FALL BOOK SALE: The Friends fall book sale was two days in November, a
Friday evening and a Saturday in the Senior Genter. The Invltatlon-<>nly
preview on Friday night, with appetizers donated by local restaurants, was well at-
tended.
D. Collection development:
The new reference books make a big difference in how well we can serve the
residents of Chanhassen-- our new books on animals, countries, literary criticism,
sdence, sdentlsts, history, Native Americans-- continue to be used almost daily. We
now have so many new reference books that they are being shelved on the top of
the bookcases. Tax forms will no longer fit in the library and will be displayed in the
hallwaylIobby.
Our on-line databases ( some of whIch are available on a trial basis) have been
more and more heavily used. We use the Internet more and more to answer ques-
tions; having a staff terminal for the internet Will be a big help.
Popular juvenile series are now displayed in spinner racks near the juvenile
books, and videocassettes are now stored near the door to the library.
The uncataloged paperback racks have been moved, to make room for a new refer-
ence desk, and stored shelving was moved out of the staff room, to make room for
assembled shelving.
E. Staff
Now almost the whole time there are two people on duly. Branch Ubrarian was
treated for tendonitis.
F. Building:
The public Is anxious to hear news of the proposed building.
cc ~ ~(,4'
--
PATROL DIVISION
Memo
To: Bridle Creek Residents: Mary Minear, Lu Ann Sidney
Carver County Environmental: Marcus Zbinden
City of Chanhassen: Cindy Kirchoff
Holasek Greenhouses: Earl and Sharon Holasek
From: Sgt. Dave Potts
Date: February 24, 2000
Re: Neighborhood Noise
This memo is to clarify, from my perspective, the status of noise complaints made by
residents in the Bridle Creek area. I have only recently been brought into this issue, but
have spoken with the persons listed above and have tried to evaluate where the issue
stands.
Residents have a concern about a disturbing noise and what can be done to abate it.
The noise occurs frequently for hours and/or days at a time during the colder months of
the year, but sporadically, and may not be noticed for several consecutive days.
_ Residents have walked and driven around the nearby industrial and business areas.
They believe the noise of concern to be coming from Holasek Greenhouses.
_ Residents have had contact with the MN Pollution Control Agency. The MPCA referred
the complaint to the county and city.
_ County Environmental has done some monitoring in the area as scheduling of
personnel permits, have not found any excessive levels of noise, but possibly the
monitoring did not occur when the noise has been disturbing.
_ The City referred the residents to law enforcement to enforce the city ordinances
regulating disturbing noises. It is my opinion that noises generated in the regular
course of business activity are regulated through agencies outside of law enforcement.
. Page 1
- Holasek Greenhouses have operated since about 1957. The only noise producing
equipment they operate would be a wood burning boiler, installed according to existing
restrictions about 1980. The equipment is maintained and inspected regularly.
- While the residents believe they have pin-pointed the source to be coming from
Holasek's there has been no independent verification of that, or of what piece of
equipment is causing the noise. If it actually is Holasek's boiler, the latest theory
suggests that during colder periods, the boiler works harder, brings in more wood chips,
and brings in more combustion air needed to burn the wood, resulting in more noise
being emitted, possibly through the exhaust. Perhaps, under certain atmospheric and
weather conditions the sound reverberates in the Bridle Creek area.
- Mr. And Mrs. Holasek spent a good amount of time with me and showed me the boiler
facility. They welcome efforts to pin-point the source of the noise being complained
about. They told me that, while they believe their equipment is well within any noise
guidelines, if their equipment is producing noise that disturbs neighbors, they would
consider any suggestions to deflect or buffer the noise as a good neighbor gesture.
- Whatever the case, I believe both the area residents and the Holaseks want some final
determination and resolution.
- Sound can be difficult to track. It can be distorted, reflected, affected by atmospheric
conditions, etc.
I offer the following to assist on this issue: Residents will report the noise to Sheriff's
dispatch when the noise is occurring. A deputy will meet the reporting person at their
home to objectively evaluate the level or volume of the noise. Deputies do not, and will
not use any sound meters, but will evaluate the noise as being reasonable or
unreasonable. The deputy will then track the noise to the source and report back to
me. I will report back to the persons listed above.
- Once the exact source of the noise is determined we can look at options to resolve the
issue.
Thank you
. Page 2
\æ ." ¡> . It' C' ~ð /,'~,//j
';/~7~,:' ->-.
Ad Hoc Committee
Febmary 16, 2000
Meeting Notes
Fr~~ ..~ ~ ,.':"'..~
.:..t ..., 'oj ..
CITY ùf l.in"""'''~-·_··
Diana Kasper convened the meeting and following introductions, Lee
Meyer of KKE Architects explained the funding for the fields at the
present Middle School campus and the proposed sequence of
development. Points were made including:
· irrigation is critical (it does not do any good to develop new
fields if the old or new are not irrigated)
· 70 X 110 is minimum size for soccer field
· Chaska Tennis Assn. wants to dome four tennis courts which could be
a partnership with funding from the Tennis Assn., Chaska Parks and
Recreation, and the District.
The discussion then moved to the Chaska High School site. Comments
included:
· High School Soccer will use Chanhassen fields after school until 5:30
PM in the Fall, 2000.
· Fields must be irrigated or they will turn brick hard.
· To accommodate Youth Soccer, work on fields would need to wait
until after July 10th
· Work on the fields was budgeted for $180,000
· Low cost/minimal reconstruction would cost $60,000
· High perfonnance fields (sand peat) would cost around $350,000
· Concern about the high use of the fields mean that the low
cost/minimal reconstruction would be wasted money and effort
· Concern about the seeding and watering being done properly was
answered by having John Hopko, turf specialist, supervise the project
· Sand peat fields are high maintenance (more watering and more
fertilizer)
· Well would be needed to offset the cost of city water (cost estimate
$45,000)
· Fmstrating to taxpayers when the fields at surrounding school
districts look so much better. Our use is increasing. There was
consensus about holding off doing anything at the site until July 10th
and eliminating the path between the fields.
Can we change the budget for the site?
What is the cost of bleachers? Why the difference between $150,000
and S120,000 It was later explained that the difference of$30,000 is
in the design costs, the fencing, etc.
Groups indicated that they might be able to fund the bleachers so that
the money contributed could go back to fields to get sand peat fields.
"Need to do things right". The group felt that the filds need to be of
quality this time around or another referendum would not be
supported
$250,000
-180,000
75,000 needed from fundraising
The money for the well might come from capital outlay funds
Concern about the funds committed to Chaska High School fields not
being used for other purpose if fields would be delayed. Timeline for
doing South fields needed with a "drop dead" date for the
fundraising.
New Middle School
Participants will be invited to the Design Team meeting when
outdoor facilities are discussed.
Legislative Bill "Mighty Kicks" #2733 was described and persons
ask to write local legislators (Carol Molnau) and the Governor to
support.
.... tD tD <n ""' tD tn
0 0 0 0 0 0 c
~ z z c:
.. 0 0 :0 ""' Z CD
,. n > e ....
" '" <n .. r 0
.. .. .. 0 ...¡
< ,. ,. 0 >
.. .. .. " <n ,...
z z Z " n
c: !' !' .. 0
~ < C
N .. Z
z ...¡
c:
...
<A
~
w
o
~
111
o
o
o
o
o
<A
~
-.J
U1
o
o
o
o
o
<A
~
\)
111
-.J
o
o
o
o
o
o
1: () () 0 fT1 fT1 '- 0 n CD -i Z Z 0
:: 3: :: > 0 0 J: X ,... '" '" '"
¡¡) tn III tn I1J () Z > > c n ~ ~ III
J: ~ ...¡ > Z III ." J: ...¡
en 0 fT1 ...¡ J: :>; ." Z fT1 3: "
C
n > :¡: > > () 0 ,... n
J: 3: z > I1J ,... '" 0 ...¡
0 .. õ Z I1J fT1 " 0 3: 0
,... '"
0 c Z fT1 '" '" ¡¡) '" ,...
,... I1J ,... Z :>; -c Z '"
fT1
,... fT1 fT1 ...¡ en
> n
,... ,... " x
-< 0
en 0
n ,...
J:
0
0
,...
'" '"
<A .. - - ...
... <A <A ~ ... ... ... - .0 o¡ J>,
J>, -.J J>, \) ... <A ... \) - - .. II) II) 0>
W - CD CD 0> -.J II) -..J .. 111 - - - 0
- \) 111 0 J>, II) ~ -..J (, 111 (J1 W W ~
(J1 J>, 111 \) W \) 0 0> (J1 W 0 \) W -.J
.I> 0 111 111 0 0 0 CD 0 CD 0 0 0 0
9 9 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
"D
::0
o
'-
,.,
o
-i
o
>
...¡
'"
[ J
c
0
G1
'" [ J to
-i " C to
~
" 0 ;u-
:0 ¡¡) ",en
c:
.. '" .,,0
:0 ...¡
< "',,**,
z ;u "
.0 '"
0 '" z
C N ." N
0 0 ·0
::0 0 " c
" 0 ...¡ ;::
'"
0
...¡
0
"T1
0
"
0
>
<n
....¡
'"
0
<
>
::0
>
Z
0
'"
C)
o
U>
...¡
- - - .. .
-
i
,
.
.
,
:
,.
n.....I""'n!ð9
II:) .. n ""'.2 i'í.
:. 3i~¡";::~,"
S' ;J.ð:"" ::-13 :
. . § m
:) ! if. .
n g 3
-
"
..
/<'
.
¡
! I
..¡
''''1
§.
8'
~
~ ..
",m...
.§§§
1888
1
¡ I
; I
: ¡
;
i
i
-, "'I '
,
; , ¡
!
J
!
J
,
L I : '_
¡ffi
. ; III \
¡-tit
Ii \ I
i II
~t1T
.
~ I \
~ J-H
; I \ II \1
LL~ li LL \
t ,. . .. ~ :-; :: ~
I
n......,,'no!!!
" n n .,,'!! .. c:
a. 3 !!., 0- a: _.::t
~.~ m[ ¡
::I _. ~
I.!! 0
,- "m
¡;
3
n
"
¡;
_ .. .. .: :~ : :0; ~. :: .. ..
.... z
~ n"'Vlcn-4"n¡;Ci~·
~i I~ ~ 5"~~H h,,ª,I5.;
~ ¡: ~Ltl;;l 3
~ ã'i"! ~
.so "~ ~
~< ~' g'
I~ ".
" "
- !!.
.. .
<. .. '. ~
::. ~ ~ ; .. ... -
. - ... .. - ..
....!P ." ,,13 .,,;... ... 5'.'
~ ~ !õ. i!.1! ir ; <:
o.5-··..~;ñ·
.,,- ILn- --
it"" "'::e
n!J~H ~_.
f¡~ .F §:t
iÕg. ã n
;'0"" ~
~;:; æ. ¡;;
.
"
z ::
o ~
. .
~
, ~ ... ...... ..J:~m"'''''''
J - 1.:~1eI"~ ...CD ....... ..... .. ...$M ~!.~ OJ 0
-...... -... ;.. cnUt...cn§ ~~Q~ ......,.w§ ...-§ --~ c: æ
---"2- ¡¡; atj~~ C;~~ ùn~ iDôl98~
000&.11 en !!;",5:c 8 E
'§§~~~-Š .§ UU ~-šn§ un §nu '§"§§-ŠUU n Z
~ ~
88888:5 8 8888 :588:58 88:58 88888 :588888:58
;
i
II
I
.
s;>.......'" "'¡;>"~'::f
~¡~~Ifl~! :l~
~ II!I~ -
'< m 90 :.
... n n
c: . ".
1 log [
õl
I
¡ I
\
\ \
I
,
I
1
I
I I II I III I I ¡I
I
'" "
c: ~
8 ;;
n n
~ c
n
0
·
·
~
n
c
."
- "
Z n
< <
o -
ñ g
n .
n
Z c
< .
0 Z
- n
o Z
~ -
- z
0 <
o Q
> 0
~ n
n 0
\ è'
n ~
0 0
~ ~
~
n
C
II ..,
< C
~ ~
- 0
~ ~
o _
n n
"
'.
."
"
o
L
n
o
.-:!
::
~
·
. z
" ~
"
" ·
"
, Z
· 0
" n
" ·
n ,
· (II
0
c n
· 7
0
0
"
"
;;
~
·
ñ
~
~
'"
"
"
<
;¡;
õ
z
·
"
~
>
o
>
,
"
Q
-
!:!
-
o
o
-; i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ : ~ : ~ : = - s ~ ~ ~ ~ : ; ~
! ! ! I j !
!; ¡: j
~ --t_
IF i.i~l~ f ~ I
S" i· !5'~lm2::J"
Ç 'I/O a: !l Ut
!g ° ¡ 15' n
'~ . I " if
~ !:?
, n
, .
~
.
.
I
I
~j-
¡
.0 ~ _
I~· ,.... '" ..
U'. :...... W'"
o :00 ....0
j~ ;U;-;U
1888888
! !
. I :
. ,
, ,
j
non
0;f;:;:I!-,
£ ~ '" .. ",I~. .
3· i.,2 '" 2"!!i ::-
'Ii" i. ~
~ ~ co.
co.
.
'"
n
:r
o
!!.
:e
.
'"
,
..
.. ....
J9 t:~C;;o
§ "§"fU
8 8888
II
n"C-t..,°on
o.tt."g..¡
i.: :9 I§: 00 &.1;':'
!I=~rn~:;.
~ g: ~
n ~ &
;¡-
'"
n
:r
ª-
m
..
~
..
.. ....
.. _.....(01
8 ~fAmg:
§ §§~'§
8 8888
I ¡ I
¡ ! I !
! ;1 ' :
1 !,
"7T~-'. o.
j ! !
i
: I
J.j
j i I \ I \
t++f
: ! I : 1\
J~I¡.I\.
j! I \ I
. I' .
- I·
~Jì I
\ ¡ I 1\
; \ \ Ii \
:TrI- ¡ \
¡ ! I \ \ \
I \ I \ i
~¡7 I. II
i,I\\ illJI
' III i
LL ..J.J. '- - --'--"-,
I
I
\
\
i
- '"., .,: " .: 'I·' C . .. . c· . " . " E ' ., .: " ·"·r-, f
,_ I:
Q on -I ." g i-º ~
;!.!! =. ~"~'I·~
~I; "'ãl:J=
J 'J
n~-Ig':;¡~Ji'=
!I ~ m.:! .. "- ,-
5'~-'. "'2 c
~... .... n 2-
" 'S'. 0
~ ~;;.
;¡-
3
.
,
g
I
..
~
8
..
'" ..
..~
~n
888
;;"C-tcn"T\~j\:'
o ~ C"'::I ~
;!..~~:!..'" .~
Ii; fft2:1()
. n:r
a -_.
~ ~. ~
8
co.
n
.
~
~
~
~ ..
..'"
...............-NS·s¡
00000 ts
8888888
I
\
\
ill
n."...."nä~1f
a" .., :I
g 3 ..... oIi'!'.
~!:~rn~:)~
œ ¡¡:'
" ::J!!!
.
3
.
~
~
Š t: g¡~
'§ '§~'n
8 8888
_.
~
'"
'§
8
..
~~..
"0-
"'~'"
lU ¡
888
..-.,
I
I
i -h
I
I:
I ++1
I ,
I Ii
I 1 \-\~
,.-
\ \ Ii
·+li
\ \ \
\ I
11'1
\ \ 'I
, I
I I'
i_ II
. . . '"
. . ... ,
, - .,.. ...
I I I
,
-< '" en n -
0 g c: n;¡>;;,g>~a ii'~1
£ '"
~ -< 1 i '" ~ .. ~¡!¡I~
" Q 0 ~ ",' ~",~ =a Q.
. ~ -<
~ n ~ ., i' 6
. ! ~ =a .2,.
"
Co
c I
3
n
0 i
~
~ ~ 1-1-1 ¡
.. .. I
w ~ ~ ~
"0 .. "", ~ I"",,,, W~
.. .... .... .. ..'"
'" '" 0 .. UlU'I 01U1
'0 '8 ... '§ "U'5'U
.. g
..
'" g '" 8 8 8 8 8 8,
.. ..
! i
I \ I
I II I ,
_.
I III
I
, II
I ,
i \ I ' I I
c-Ju 1 i
I
,
I , I
i ,
I !
JJ! I
I
\ ! ! I
I I:
I ,
--. I, I
,
-~" : I
I,
I
!
. I
I Iii --.-'
I
,
__.1 1 i .. ..
I L_. I
-->..
... ~ p .
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
690 City Cml" DIÜit. PO Box 147
Ch4nhtmta. MinntrDI4 55317
Phønr 612.937.1900
GrnmI Fax 612.937.5739
El1ginming Fax 612.937.9152
P"blic S4JfCJ' Fox 612934.2524
U'tb ll'lI'll'.â.d]¡mh4SJtu.l1w.U!
February 25, 2000
Mr. Dale Dawson
2181 Stone Creek Drive
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Dear Mr. Dawson:
Thank you for your letter addressed to Jan Lash, chairperson of the Park and
Recreation Commission. Unfortunately, the commission does not see a way in
which to expedite the 2nd phase of the Stone Creek playground. As you know, the
expansion is scheduled for 2003 at a $20,000 level.
The commission reviewed your letter at their February 22 meeting. Upon
conclusion of the discussion that evening, Chair Lash requested that I notify you
of their finding. Commissioner Mike Howe, who I understand is your neighbor,
would also be happy to discuss the realities of the commission's budget
constraints with you.
Again, thank you for your letter.
Sincerely,
~~
Todd Hoffman
Park and Recreation Director
TH:ns
c: Scott Botcher, City Manager
-'Mayor and City Council
Park and Recreation Commission
g:\park\th\dawson.doc
swcrc
. . ·<!.~A&.til
SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR TRANSPORTATION COAUllON',"?"
;.', - ,> >: i.':::y¥~:::·~~,~~:·,¡,I~~:;:
DATE: Febl'\l8lY 29. 2000. :)
, -- -... , , ,- < ~
TO:
SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR TRANSPORTATION COALITION MEMBERS
.'
FROM:
ROBERT J. LlNDALL, PRESIDENT
,<. ,1".: ;:::~<f: -~.';:_~~~:.:j
MEETING NOTICE
; ~:h:
"'. '"
Friday, March 17,2000
7:30 AM -9:00 AM
CHANHASSEN RECREATION CENTER
2310 Coulter Boulevard
(612/474-0641)
AGENDA
1. Project Reports on TH 212 & TH 5
2. 2000 Legislative Session update
3. Alliance Washington Fly-in (June 13-15)
4. MnlDOT TH 212 Open House
5. Other business
6. Adjourn.
':-'
'.
Lt Please take a moment to help us update the SWCTC mailing list.
(~,ç'!Ì~_~j( ~fj~1:~riJ.Q'~~Fr1iri0ÉI-IJÆ~·~~É~}fßf;~JfJ~!:~~2j:_b?~~':H~;í~-9:~~i;,_~~E;k1~f~U~~~'F!1:;i1:-[1\TJi'}~~;à"I0~2~iG-::::
.'- .'~... .,.........."..-.,
;:,,,:"'.: ,;~,',' ,: _~~;.¡;:<,,;f';~
_.,.,.........~......;.,'\;.,~.~-~
·OP1· ···'·k·· " - f¡ ·-..··..ë:J·b· ......... ""/. ..' ··fj'··f¡·'11 .... . ." .. '.,,' " .... . ......"
.' . e·'a·s' e· e~'me:'n O"me :}!;' :co'm p. e· tingte' '0 O·.."ng···"·'·{- <. ,.':":. '.::. 'è". ,':...'."~:'.
"- .:c· ,", . :',. ...., "r. .", ,.') ',' .'~ _ . . " . . '0" ~ , ''- "' .w., ,.i". 4~,-",~",:þ··~;:"\1' ,;-;':1¥':,~, /..-.,' ',.ß¡;~·"~'·';'-".~-'~,~fl\
.;..··,''"'~~..."'''''''''''''-·,·'-'.."·'''·...,h,..._·..... ,~,.,.....,.....~...__.....__,~..;...= a,:_~ "-'_.'_"".","-,' ~.'---..-,-.-..."";;"s...." ;,_...."'-. .._. ,·--'i0.~".'J!j..,c.,..",'.,~.,-.-.,.!t.~.U.,.,. ..'''''_,'."c._,,;;'',,-,':''~.,'~
Name
Company
Address
City
Phone
E-mail
State
Zip
FAX
:a.·PJ¡/ii~è~fiimcjy',"¡¡ònrííìåïi]¡f¡lJ.fíf<;:p'ii{~¥.ii'wì1ifi·i~"Yii¡;'rn~-"¡'fi.8. ·.é:cimpãnY·Óììi.v~~ö.~~5;~!J
Please fax this back to 651/659-9009 or e-mail to kjensen@transportationalliance.com
Or call Kathy Jensen at 651/659-0804. Thank you.
NO RSVP NECESSARY
470 Pillsbury Center e Minneapolis, MN 55402
PHONE: (612) 337-9300 e FAX: (6121337.9310
You are cordially invited to attend the
Annual Supervisors Dinner
for the
CARVER SOIL & WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT
When:
Friday, March 24th
6:30 p.m. - Social Hour
7:00 p.m. - Dinner
Where:
Kube's Supper Club, Norwood
Cost:
$10.50 per person
If you would like to attend, please return this registration form before March 15.2000.
Name:
Please list all persons attending - we will make name tags for you
No. Attending:
Amount Enclosed:
Mail your registration form to:
Carver SWCD, 219 E. Frontage Road, Waconia, MN 55387
Questions? Call Felicia at 952-442-5101
See you on the 24'h!
... ~~~ Vi. 'u
r--'¡~ ow..
a..,.. ·-:IØ-ø...
-)
612 937 5739 Adninistrator
Page 001 Df 002
FRIDAyFAX
A weekly legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities
Number 5
March 3, 2000
Legislative highlights from the week of Feb. 28
Bleacher safety modifica-
tions advance and retreat
The House Govemment Opera-
tions Committee approVed a bill
Thursday to mOd"y the bleacher
safety requirements offered by
Rep. Fran Bradley (R-Rochester).
Under the bill, bleachers less than
55 inches would be exempt, the
compliance date would be moved
to August 1, 2001, and existing
bleachers with 9-inch or less gaps
would be grancffathered. Under
current law, bleachers less than
30 inches are exempt and all
bleachers must conform to the
4-inch gap standard by Jan. 1, 2001.
The House committee action may
be for naught. The Senate Govern-
ment Operations Committee late
last night defeated a similar bill
offered by Sen. Deanna Wiener
(DFL-Eagan) on a 5-4 vote. We'll
have to see i1 the Senate bill can
be reincarnated, or " another bill
becomes a vehicle 10r further action.
Transportation funding
On Thursday, the Senate Trans-
pOl1ation Committee considered a
delete-all amendment to a bill
offered by Sen. Carol Flynn (DFL-
Minneapolis) that would modity
1unding for transportation and
transit. The proposal would reduce
license tab fees, replace lost
revenue with sales tax from motor
vehicle sales, create a multi-modal
1und with additional motor vehicle
sales tax receipts, and dedicate the
sales tax on motor vehicles to the
multi-modaI1und.
The Flynn proposal on tab fee
reductions Is less aggressive than
the govemor's proposal to limit
license 1ees to $75 per vehicle.
The governor's proposal would
require the dedication 01 54 per-
cent of the sales tax on motor
vehicles to maintain the Highway
User Tax Distribution Fund. The
balance of the sales tax on motor
vehicles would be dedicated to a
multi-modaI1und.
The Flynn proposal would maintain
the 1unding 10r the Highway User
Tax Distribution Fund through a
25 percent dedication, and make
an additional $300 million per year
available to fund transpol1ation and
transit projects across the state
through the multi-modaI1und.
The debate is 1ar 1rom being
resolved. The House has yet to
solidify Its transpol1ation funding
strategy. There are bills in the
House that loosely resemble the
governor's proposal. And a bill was
introduced yesterday that would
speed up current projects by
trans1erring nearly $400 million
1rom the general1und and $77
million 1rom the trunk highway 1und
to the Dept. 01 Transportation 10r
state road construction projects.
House budget resolution
The House Ways and Means
Committee adopted a budget
resolution yesterday that estab-
lishes spending targets for the
1inance committees. The committee
with the largest authorization is
transportation 1inance, with $350
million to allocate for transportation
projects. The next highest commit-
tee is K-12 education 1inance Wilh
$28 million. These targels do not
include lax cuts, which Ihe lax
committee may pass, or capital
projects 10 be paid through Slale
bonds.
The Senale will sel its own bUdgel
largets soon. D"ferences will have
to be resolved between House and
Senale leaders as Ihe omnibus
spending bills move into confer-
ence commlnee.
Omnibus pension bill
The Legislalive Commission on
Pensions and Relirement com·
pleted ilS omnibus pension bill al
midnighl Monday. The bill does nOI
address Ihe sigMicant funding
deficiency of PER A, which will be
studied over the interim. The bill
includes several changes 10 Ihe
volunteer fire relie1 stalules,
including increases in the maximum
pension benefil allowed and
Clarifying Ihat the open meeling law
applies to relief associalion boards.
The bill also eSlablishes a lask
force thaI Includes a League of
Minnesota Cities representative to
study reliree heaith care benefils
over Ihe interim.
The bill passed Ihe Senale Gov-
ernment Operations Committee Iale
lasl night and awails similar aClion
in Ihe House.
Continued on page 2
For 1110'£ information on ell)' legis/cult-'f lsslles~ contact an)' member of the League of Minnesota CILli!s Inlergot.'ernmenlal Re/allDns team.
(651) 281-1200 or (BOO) 925-1122
liar 83 2BB8 15:88:39 Via Fax
FRIDAyFAX
M"""", 3, 2000-PASE 2
-)
612 937 5739 AdMinistrator
Page 882 Of 882
Rule petition law
A bill extending the sunset of the
1999 rule petition law passed the
House Governmemal Operations
Committee yesterday. The law
authotizes focal governments to
pelition Ihe state for amendmem or
repeal 01 a state agency rule if the
rule Is unreasonable or if a less
costly method of achieving the
purpose of the rule is found. The
bill, carried by Rep. Sherry
Broecker (A-Vadnais Heights), will
extend the sunset to July 31, 2006.
Business subsidies bills
H.F. 3057, imroduced by Rep. Dan
McElroy (R-Burnsville), and the
companion bill S.F. 2893, Imro-
duced by Sen. John Hottinger
(DFL-Mankalo). received hearings
in the House and Senate this week.
The two versions comain some
considerable differences.
The House bill still increases the
$25,000 threshold to $100,000.
The Senate bill contains new
requirements communities must
adopt prior to awarding any new
business subsidies, and require-
mems dealing with time limits for
the goals that must be idemified In
the sUbsidy agreemem. Provisions
that appeared in the otiginal
version of the Senate bill, including
a relocation impact study require-
mem, additional relocation report-
Ing requirements, and certain
details regarding the specific wage
floor requirement, are no longer
Included.
The House bill was re-referred to
the tax committee and the Senate
bill was sent directly to the floor.
We expect the two bills to be
reconciled In conference commit-
tee. Look for more details in the
next Cirles Bullerln.
County plat review
SF 702 (Vickerman) was pasSed
by the Senate Transportation
Comminee to the Senate floor
yesterday. The House Transporta-
tion Committee will hear H.F. 672
(Kuisle) today and it will likely be
referred to Ihe Local Government
Comminee. Unlike the original
version, this bill does NOT require
county approval ¡or city plats.
This bill:
· Clarifies the comment period for
cities, towns and county plats.
· Requires counties to develop
guidelines for their use when
reviewing plats abuning county
roads.
· Does NOT allow county approval
of city or town plats.
· Does NOT imerfere with approval
timelines.
With this amendment, the League
of Minnesota Cities and the Asso-
ciation of Metropolitan Municipali-
ties no longer oppose this bill.
MI NN ESOTA
CITIES:
League of Minnesota Cities
Annual Conference 2000
LMC. 87" Annua! Conference
June 1.3-16, 2000
St. Cloud, Minnesota
Mark your calendar now
and plan to join us
for LMC's premier
conference event!
Attending LM C. Ann uoJ
Conference 2000 is a Smart
way to colleCT srrategies .1lld
information. renew your
enthusiasm. investigate new
producTS and services. and
spend time with colleagues
who will remind you of your
commitment to outstanding
leadership.
Plan now to join us in St.
Cloud, and well warmly
welcome you there!
See future issues of Cines
Bulle;in and !he April issue
of MinnesoTa CiTÙs magazine
for more information on how
to register for this event. or
download the housing and
registration ~
forms from
our Web site: LMC
www.lmnc.org. ~"',";:,""..t:::'
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
) City Cmttr Dri1Jt, PO Box 147
;¡14fIh4ssm, Mi.."otI155317
P/Xillt 612.937. 1900
GtlltTlll F/JX 612937.5739
'¡gil1",i.g F/JX 612.937.9152
,bJi( SA!"), F.x 612.934.2524
ftb u'1J.IJl~â.(IJ4 JJJJlSSt'n.11Jn.UJ
March 3, 2000
Ms. Robin Spevacek
1781 Ringneck Drive
Excelsior, MN 55331
Dear Robin:
Park and Recreation Commissioner Jay Karlovich asked that I contact you
regarding the freedoms or lack thereof that dog owners have within the city.
Currently, there are only two places that dogs can be off leash but still within their
owners control; on a public water body or on private property. Dogs are allowed
on leash on city street right-of-ways and city trails. Currently, Carver County
allows leashed pets anywhere within the boundaries of Minnewashta Regional
Park. Pets on or off leash are restricted from city parks with the exception of
walking leashed pets on trails within park boundaries.
Carver County Parks Director Marty Walsh is considering the development of a
fenced "off leash" exercise area at Minnewashta Regional Park; however, the
park's current master plan does not include such a facility. Overall the city
receives many more complaints about dog problems than complaints about the
lack of rights for dogs and their owners. The Park and Recreation Commission
has reviewed the policy of restricting dogs from city parks on a couple of
occasions over the past 10 years. In all instances, the ordinance has been upheld.
If you have any questions or comments regarding this topic, please contact me.
s~~
Todd Hoffman
Park and Recreation Director
c: Scott Botcher, City Manager
Mayor and City Council
Park and Recreation Commission
BOB MARTINKA
U.S. Census 2000 Recruiter / Carver County
6650 Powers Blvd.
Chanhassen, MN 55317
(612) 474-1103
Cell Phone (612) 816-4621
E-Mail: martinka@ix.netcom.com
March I, 2000
TO: Mayor Nancy Mancino
Mark Engel
Linda Jansen
Steve Labatt
Mark Senn
RE: U.S. Census 2000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you for your attention during the February 14th meeting of the City Council to the brief comments made
by Mr. Ivan Schultz regarding the status of U.S. Census 2000 in the Chanhassen area. I have since been
assigned responsibility for this part of Carver County.
The response to our various initiatives to employ the number of census takers essential to the Chanhassen
area must be substantially improved if we are to achieve the goal set for our community. Assistance from
and the participation by civic, business, church and social groups will be essential if we are identify and
attract a good work force for this 4-6 week activity. We remain in contact with these sectors.
I expect there are just so many more options available to our local and area residents and other activity
competing for their attention.....making the part-time income not as attractive as in the more rural cities and
towns of Carver County where response is somewhat larger.
Minnesota reports that for every individual counted or not counted, there can be up to a $2,500 differentiual in
support to an area. Assuming there is quite a range of impact for various areas, it still appears that
communiuties have a major vested interest, especially in a growing and changing demographic environment.
We are asking assistance of each city and township in form of sending a letter to former or recent
Election Judges encouraging their application for Census enumerator positions. I have met with Office
Manager Karen Engelhardt <egarding this assistance, provided her with a draft letter and necessary
materials, and she was most c,\operative in taking this under consideration.
,
Individual referrals to orosoective 'census-takers from members of the council and from all citv emplovees are
most welcome and mav made either to me at 474-1103 or simply suggest thev give me or the Census Bureau
(445-0202) a call.
Our appreciation to the City for space that continues to be provided for our weekly information and job
application sessions. Susan Marek and staff at the Rec Center have been most cooperative in making these
arrangements for the Census Bureau's initiatives in Chanhassen. '
Sincerely,
/
\
\.
.~......(
'.)', II.·
I./~' ~.
Bob Martínka
/
(,t" '
"
01/08/1994 23:56
4674355
CARVER COUNTY PARKS
PAGE 02
.
WILLIAM OTTO NAEGELE
February 24, 2000
Mr. Marty WaJ8h, Director
Lake Minnewashta Regional Park
1077! Couaty Road 33
Norwood. Young America, MN !5397
Dear ~arty:
Please accept this letter as a request from the residents of tbe Lake Minnewashta
area to shoot off a fireworks display from tbe point north of the swimming beach
in Lake Minnewashta Regional Park on Tuesday, July 4, 2000 at approximately
10:00 p.m~
The fireworks'\vould be done professionally by Americana Fireworks.
Americana will provide the necessary Certificate of Insurance and will
coordinate this activity with the Chanbassen Fire Department. We would also
notify the Carver County Water Patrol so they can oversee and coordinate safe
boating while the fireworks are being detonated.
As you know, the residents of Lake Minnewasbta have sponsored fireworks for
approximately 15 years. The Lake Minnewashta Regional Park location would
be tbe most logical and safest place to sboot off the display. In tbe event of rain,
we would reschedule tbis event for New Year's Eve 2000/2001.
lfyou have any questions oríteed any further information, please feel free to
contact me.· We look forward to celebrating America, Motberhood and Apple
Pie on t 4t1o of Ju
cc: Mr. Len Bouader, Amer1ealla Fireworks
cc: Mr. Scott Botcher, CIty Manager
CC: Mr. Jolm Wolff, Fire Chief
cc: Deputy Doug SChnddtkc, Carver County Water Patrol
# 1 Watertower Place . 4300 Baker ROOd . Mlnnetonka. M nf"lA~otn ~~.'\lt':\ . ^ 1 '?_O~A... ~rYY"'! ... C,....>./ Á 1 ..:;-~~.._~--
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
690 City Cmter Drive, PO Box 147
Clw¡/}R!Sm, Mi/JIlfsotR 55317
Pho}}e 612.937.1900
emernl ht 612.937.5739
Ellgill"';'lg Fax 612.937.9152
Public .14'0· F,¡x 612.934.2521
ìrU, lI'll'll~â.(¡'llllh7.ì..('//.IIII1.W
':'
(,',..J
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor
City Council
FROM:
Scott Botcher, City Manager
DATE:
March I. 2000
SUB}:
Tax Increment Financing Legislation
As you ail know, Todd and I were present at the State this week to present
testimony on legislation to eliminate one of the chronological time limits
involving economic development districts. I am enclosing a memo to Senator
Oliver and Representative Workman from Ron Batty discussing this issue. As [
find it to be a fairly clear and weil written memo regarding this issue. I thought
you might find it of benefit.
g:\lIsd~c~-:Ub\tir-e.d.1C
.... :..·..f 1,/. ../:.. ./. I. . ./.....:.. I
J. . .,.
..JI
, ,
r:.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Senator Ed Oliver and Representative Tom Workman
FROM:
Ron Batty, Chanhassen EDA Attorney
DATE:
February 15,2000
RE:
Amendment to Tax Increment Financing Act
Weare proposing an amendment of general application to the tax incre.hent financing act for the
purpose of clarifying the durational limits of economic development TIF districts. With respect
to all other types of TIF districts, state law describes the durationallimit as a specified number of
years after receipt of the first increment. Another provision of the TIF statute allows an authority
to retain all increment payable in the final calen(\ar year of the district. The one exception to the
rule is with regard to economic development TIF districts. Current law specifies the durational
limit as nine years after receipt of the first increment or II years from the date of approval of the
tax increment financing plan, whichever occurs 1Ïrst. This dual method of calculating duration is
confusing and often results in the authority receiving one fewer year of increment than it had
anticipated.
The proposed amendment, a copy of which is attached. would correct the problem by making the
method for calculating the duration of economic development districts consistent with that
applied to all other TIF districts. The limit would be set at nine years after receipt of the !ïrst
increment for all districts for which certi!ïcation was requested after May 31, 1993 and eight
years after receipt of the first increment for all economic development districts for which
certitìcation was made before June I, 1993. This ditIerence reflects a 1993 change in the statute
which extended by one year the duration of newly established economic development districts.
The amendment would be effective prospectively and retroactively for open districts. The
amendment would apply to all districts for which certitìcation was requested after May I, 2000,
the presumed effective date of the statute. The amendment would also be effective for all
districts established after July 31, 1979, but before May I, 2000, which had not yet reached the
maximum duration as expressed in the amendment and for districts established between those
dates and for which the authority had received increment from the county after the durational
limit calculated from the date of approval of ::he plan but within the durational limits if the
amendment had been in effect at the time the district was requested for certitìcation. Essentially,
the amendment is retroactive with regard to dislricts which have not yet been decertified and for
districts which have been caught in the inconsistency between the two methods of calculating
duration.
The circumstance which the amendment is designed to correct is illustrated by a probIem in
which Chanhassen currently finds itself. Chanhassen established an economic development TIF
district in 1988. At that time, the law limited such districts to 10 years from the date of approval
of the plan or 8 years after receipt of the first increment. Chanhassen received its !ïrst increment
1991. Under that portion of the durational rule, it should have been able to receive increment
RHB·176174,:1
CH 130-69
through the end of 1999. However, the district was created in March of 1988. Application of the
ten year rule means that the district should terminate in March, 1998. Because March is earlier
in the year than the date of receipt of even first half tax payments from the county, the authority
should not have received any increment in 1998. Nonetheless, Carver county paid increment to
the authority through 1998. Chanhassen spent the money, relying on the county to be
administering the district's duration. Chanhassen has now been cited for a violation by the
Office of State Auditor (OSA) and is being ordered to repay $711,000.
The dual ways of computing durationallimits for economic development districts have been a
problem for numerous cities in the state. The legislation, while beneficial to Chanhassen, will
also be helpful to all cities similarly situated. I have discussed this matter with Bill Connors, the
director of the tax increment financing division of the OSA. Mr. Connors has stated that his
office will not oppose this legislation.
RHB-J7617-h-l
CHI30-69
SUBURBAN
TRANSIT
ASSOCIATION
LEGISLATIVE REPORT
REPORT 2000-3
FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2000
LEGISLATORS PURSUE BONDING AUTHORIZATION
FOR METRO TRANSIT
Representative Ron Abrams (R-Minnetonka) and Senator Sandy Pappas (DFL-St. Paul)
have introduced bills that would increase the bonding authority provided to the
Metropolitan Council during the 1999 Legislative Session.
Last year, the Metropolitan Council requested $52 million in bonding authority to fund
capital improvement projects for transit services. The Legislature authorized only $36
million, leaving Metro Transit with no option except to cut some projects that had been
previously approved for funding.
To eliminate that deficit, House File 3530/Senate File 2935 would increase the 1999
authorization by $16 million, fulfilling the full request as submitted last year. Neither bill
has received a committee hearing - House File 3530 awaits action in the House Local
Government and Metropolitan Affairs Committee, while Senate File 2935 has been
referred to the Transportation Committee. The STA plans to strongly support passage
of this legislation, and we will keep you informed as the bills progress through the
legislative process.
Representative Carol Molnau (R-Chaska) and Senator Dean Johnson (DFL-Willmar)
have introduced nearly identical legislation, with the only difference being that their
legislation includes a general fund appropriation of $3.7 million to Metro Transit and $1
million to the Minnesota Department of Transportation for grants to public transit
systems for building transit facilities and hubs. House File 3559/Senate File 3306 have
also not yet received any legislative action.
':";;"i':,~Y";,~
The STA L~ls1.tlve Reøort Is prepared by Thomas J. Poul.nd hnnlfet' J. Peterson
Messerli & Kramer P.A., 145 University Avenue War. Suite 450, St Paul, MN 55103
.. ;::~ 'ìODO
, ".'.1., .;
,,,,d.
SENATOR DICK DAY INTRODUCES "FREEDOM TO DRIVE" AGENDA
Senator Dick Day (R-Owatonna) has introduced a number of bills that, taken together,
represent one of his primary legislative pursuits for the 2000 Legislative Session - the
Freedom to Drive Agenda (the Agenda). Senator Day's initiative includes a resumption
of his assault on ramp meters and high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes; a
transportation-funding package; a prohibition on left-lane driving for purposes other than
passing; and a bill to increase the speed limit on a portion of Interstate 35E through S1.
Paul. On February 16, a hearing was held to consider his various proposals.
Senate File 2480 would place a moratorium on the use of ramp meters this October.
During the break, the effects turning off ramp meters would have on traffic flow and
safety. Senate File 2480 was amended and approved by the Senate Transportation
Committee on February 16. It now heads to the Transportation Budget Division for
consideration. Senate File 2481 would open the HOV lanes on Interstates 35W and
394 to general traffic and the dedicated center lane on 1-394 would be opened to east-
bound traffic during the morning rush hour and to west-bound traffic in the evening.
Senate File 2481 has been referred to the Transportation Budget Division where it
awaits action. You might recall that Senator Day pursued both of those proposals last
session, but was defeated following testimony by MNDoT, the STA and other
transportation groups. The STA will again oppose passage of these bills as they
remove important incentives for transit users.
Senate File 2482, the speed limit increase legislation, has already been disposed of by
the Transportation Committee. At the February 16 hearing, officials from Minnesota
Department ofTransportation (DOT) testified against increasing the speed limit on 1-35E
through S1. Paul from 45 miles per hour to 55 miles per hour. DOT explained to the
Committee that they feel boùnd by a federal court order not to raise the speed limit at
this location (sometimes called a ·practice freeway· by disdainful legislators). The court
order was part of a settlement reached in the 1980s between DOT and area residents
opposed to the freeway. Following testimony and debate, the Committee voted against
approval of Senate File 2482.
Senate File 2483 is Senator Day's transportation funding proposal. He would reduce
vehicle registration taxes from the current fonnula ($10 added to 1.25 percent of a
vehicle's base value) to $10 plus one percent of the base value. Senator Day's bill
would require the dedication of 50 percent of tab fees to the general fund and 50
percent to the highway user tax distribution fund. Finally, he is proposing a
constitutional amendment that would dedicate 50 percent of the motor vehicle excise
tax to the highway user tax distribution fund.
This legislation was scheduled for a hearing on February 16, but no action was taken at
that time. Instead, Senate File 2483 was referred to the Transportation Budget
Division.
2
.
Senate File 2484 would prohibit driving in the left-hand lane unless overtaking slower
vehicles. Mark Rask, author of American Autobahn, testified on behalf of the bill. Mr.
Rask said the bill eases stress for all drivers, as slow and fast moving vehicles work
together. To illustrate how traffic would flow under such a policy, Mr. Rask showed
video footage of the German Autobahn, a comparison that some Senators felt was
inappropriate as there is little similarity between the rural Autobahn highway and
Minnesota's urban freeways. Senate File 2484 was approved by the Committee and
referred to the Transportation Budget Division.
At this time, no House companion bills have been introduced for Senator Day's
legislation. We will continue to monitor and update you on the progress of the Freedom
to Drive Agenda.
HOUSE REPUBLICANS CONTINUE ASSAULT ON LRT
House Republicans, calling light rail transit (LRT) a "boondoggle," recently announced
plans to repeal the nearly $100 million in bonding that has been authorized during the
past two years. Last year, LRT funding was included in a bill that provided tax cuts and
other funding initiatives as a compromise between the governor and legislators.
House Republicans have never been overly supportive of LRT, and they recently
expressed frustration with the cost of building the Hiawatha Corridor, and with the
projected benefit-cost return of $0.42 for every $1.00 spent. Instead of LRT, the
Republican caucus has announced that they will pursue more cost-effective alternatives
such as dedicated busways.
While Republicans might gamer enough votes to pass the repeal in the House,
prospects of such legislation passing the Senate are much more slim, as the
Democratic majority supports LRT. Furthermore, as LRT is one of Governor Ventura's
favorite projects, it is unlikely that he would sign a bill calling for its repeal. No specific
legislation has been introduced yet, but we will let you know when it is.
GOVERNOR VENTURA'S TRANSIT INITIATIVE INTRODUCED
House File 2891/Senate File 2678, authored by Representative Carol Molnau (R-
Chaska) and Senator Carol Flynn (DFL-Minneapolis) is Governor Ventura's
transportation and transit proposal for this session. This legislation creates a
multimodal transportation fund, to which 46 percent of the motor vehicle excise tax
revenue would be dedicated and utilized as follows:
(1) twenty-five percent for appropriation to the metropolitan council for transit
capital, operating, and associated development purposes; and
3
,
(2) seventy-five percent of the revenue would be available for appropriation to
the Commissioner of Transportation for statewide surface transportation
purposes including, but not limited to, highways, transit capital and service
expansion needs outside the metropolitan area, commuter rail capital and
operating expenses, right-of-way presèrvation, grants to local units of
government for comprehensive planning related to transportation
investments, and other transit capital and highway purposes.
This fund would supplement, not replace, existing transit and transportation revenues.
For expenditures of funds from the transit account, the Metropolitan Council shall give
priority to transit service expansion and transit capital projects that:
(1) are consistent with the regional master transit plan and the transit capital
improvement program;
(2) support other public investments in infrastructure, housing, schools, and
other public services;
(3) encourage development that includes a mix of housing, retail, office, and
open space in a pedestrian-friendly environment; and
(4) respond to the needs of growing communities that actively foster transit-
oriented development and work with transit providers in developing
solutions to mobility needs in their localities.
. As discussed in previous issues of the Legislative Update, the 54· percent dedication
would require passage of a constitutional amendment by the electorate while the 46
percent dedication is statutory, a proposition that concerns some legislators.
This legislation also provides for a stable and predictable bonding authorization for the
Metropolitan Council. If House File 2891/Senate File 2678 becomes law, the
Metropolitan Council will have an annual increase in bonding authority based upon the
previous year's authority adjusted for inflation using the United States Department of
Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics Minneapolis-St. Paul Consumer Price Index for All
Urban Consumers (CPI-U) for the previous taxes payable year. The annual inflationary
increase will be capped at three percent. The STA is on record strongly supporting this
provision.
We will keep you up to date as the entire bill moves through the 2000 Legislature.
4
\
LEGISLATION OF INTEREST
House File 3521 was introduced on February 16. This legislation, authored by
Representative Tom Hackbarth (R-Cedar), would appropriate funding to the
Metropolitan Council for express bus service between Anoka and downtown
Minneapolis. House File 3521 would also provide for building a park and ride at the
intersection of Highway 65 and Anoka County Highway 22. This legislation does not yet
specify the amount of the appropriation. There is not yet a Senate companion bill for
House File 3521.
House File 3664 was introduced on February 17 by Representative Dan Larson (DFL-
Bloomington). This legislation would forbid MNDoT from artificially increasing waiting
periods on ramps or to encourage, influence, or force the traveling public to use
alternative routes or alternative modes of transportation. This legislation is in response
to complaints about increased traffic by residents in neighborhoods near freeway
access points. A Senate companion bill has not been introduced for this legislation at
this time.
Senator Keith Langseth (DFL-Glyndon) has introduced Senate File 2283, a bill that
would provide $3.7 million to the Metropolitan Council for transit services during fiscal
year 2001. The STA plans to support this legislation, which has not yet received a
hearing in the Transportation Committee. It also appears that Governor Ventura will be
willing to support this deficiency appropriation.
Representative Peg Larsen (R-Lakeland) has again introduced legislation to abolish or
change the structure of the Metropolitan Council. House File 3489 would abolish the
Metropolitan Council as a separate entity and transfer its duties to various existing state
agencies. House File 3529 would provide legislators with greater control over the
actions and policies of the Metropolitan Council by making it a state agency. This is the
third session during which Representative Larsen will pursue abolition of the
Metropolitan Council. She is opposed to the Metropolitan Council in large part due to
her belief that it is unresponsive to legislators and operates with too much autonomy.
5
,
..
Office of the Superintendent
Beverly A. Stofferahn
11 Peavey Road
Chaska, Minnesota 55318
(612)556-6110 Phone
(612)556-6119 Fax
StofferahnB@chaska.k12.mn.us
School
District
~ebruary 24, 2000
Dear District 112 Community Member,
Thank you again for attending District 112's Planning Conference on Saturday, January 29. Your
involvement was an essential first step in building an educational plan to serve our communities
for the next 15 - 20 years. I'm glad you were there!
Enclosed is a list of the 110 conference participants and a summary of the work completed
throughout the day. Based on the richness of the dialogue, the quality of the input, and on your
feedback, I believe the conference was a highly productive day.
What are the next steps? How can you stay involved? Over the next two months, in order to
focus and prioritize elements of the vision/mission and the critical issues, we will seek more
community involvement. Here are the ways you can help:
· During March and April, request 15-20 minutes on the agenda ofa group or organization of
which you are a member (e.g. civic groups, district committees). The time will be used to
gather broader input and feedback on vision/mission and critical planning issues. District 112
will provide materials and/or a representative for your meeting. Plcase use the encloscd form
to respond to Betsy Chase.
· Stay informed about the planning process. Rcgular updates will be made to every conference
participant. If you have an e-mail address and want to receive updates electronically rather
than through the mail, please send your e-mail address to chaseb(a) chaska.kI2.mn.us
· Provide leadership and expertise to the planning process during the next six months. Watch
updates for specific involvement opportunities and respond with your interest.
In reviewing the conference feedback forms, the willingness of each and every person to stay
involved in the planning process is truly impressive! You demonstrate and reinforce what I have
found to be true of the District 112 community: there is a high value on working together to
provide the best educational opportunities and achieve results. Thank you again for your
participation on January 29. I look forward to the future journey we will share.
Sincerely,
~offerahn
Superintendent of Schools
"""." J"C-. ;'''';~ t ,.,~.,. ,"
'; -,
!..' -.'
encL: 3
Serving the communities of eastern Carver County through equal opportunity in employment and education.
DISTRICT 112 PLANNING CONFERENCE
Chanhassen Recreation Center
January 29, 2000
8:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m.
Conference Puroose
Work together as a community to create the foundation for a 15-20 year comprehensive
plan and process for District 112.
ParticiDants
A full range ofstaffand community roles were represented among the 110 participants
including: students, parents, community leaders, business people, taxpayers, teachers,
school staff, School Board members, and administrators.
Development of the Executive Summarv
This summary is an overview of the work completed throughout the day by participants.
Members of the Conference Design Team analyzed the complete report of proceedings to
determine the themes that constitute this Executive Summary.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TELLING OUR STORIES
Participants in small mixed role groups shared their points of view.
· ualit of staff
· Range and quality of programs and
facilities
· Parent involvement
What would you most like to change
about the District 112 education s stem?
· Ca acit to meet individual needs
· District-wide sense of communit
· Higher expectations and student
achievement
· More staff develo ment
· Improve program focus, equity, quality
What energizes you most about
education in District 112?
· Children and their success is the focus
· Communit su ort
· Innovation/improvement orientation
· Growth and its 0 ortunities
· Diversit
· Sense of connectedness
· Resources to stay competitive, improve
ro ams enhance leamin
· Effective mana ement of rowth
· Pre aration for diversit
· Communication effectiveness and
efficienc
· Plannin that is more roactive
·
WHERE ARE WE TODAY?
Educational expert, Jerry McCoy, and Bev Stofferahn, superintendent, presented an
overview of opportunities and challenges facing District 112 and public education.
Participants in mixed groups responded.
What did we hear? What Questions do we have?
· Technology is changing everything. · How do we use technology as a tool to
manage as well as to further
individualize and customize education?
· How do you bridge the economic gap
to assure technology access?
· Are we driving technology or it us?
· Where will technology funding come
from?
· We are in a global society. · How do we meet the challenges of a
global education orocess?
· Change is the only constant. · Where will education be if it
· We don't know what we don't know. experiences changes similar to the
· Doing the same thing better = failure. medical field?
· How will we anticipate, embrace and
shape change?
· How do we build a flexible system?
· How do we agree on where to invest
time and money?
· We "get it" but do we do it?
· Kids are still the focus. · How do we guarantee core skills are
learned?
· How do we produce both sitters and
thinkers and standers and doers?
· How do students become well-
rounded/self-directed individuals given
all the demands on them and all the
alternatives out there?
· School is wherever learning takes · How are all the roles in education
place. affected by change?
· How do we provide training for staff
(and when) so they are prepared for
these changes?
· Human interactions and relationships · How do we keep relationships between
are the way to success. children and adults strong while we
change?
· How do we keep our sense of
community intact?
· How do we build community support/
consensus for change?
2
WHAT IS OUR VISIONIMISSION?
Current mission and vision documents for District 112 were created about 10 years ago.
Revised Mission and Vision Statement drafts were presented for feedback:
DISTRICT 112'S MISSION (purpose)
To educate and inspire all learners to achieve their potential throughout life
VISION
District 112 envisions our entire community engaged in support of learners.
Together, we strive to motivate learners who attain higher levels of achievement
and exemplify our Community Values of citizenship, human worth and dignity,
respect for others, environmentalism, integrity, responsibility, generosity, and
learning.
Mixed role groups reacted to the following questions: Is it memorable, inspiring, and
easily shared? What questions of understanding do you want to raise? Responses were
very mixed. Seemingly, the only consensus rrom conference participants was that the
proposed Mission and Vision need more work.
WHAT ARE THE CRITICAL ISSUES WE FACE?
Small role-alike groups identified the most important issues District 112 needs to address
to achieve its vision and mission. From among a total of 48 issues, each conference
participant was asked to vote on the top five. Major themes identified through this
process include:
· Adequate funding/wise use of resources (e.g. facilities, start time, )
· Attract, develop and retain quality staff and inspirational/visionary leaders
· Curriculum alignment and accountability
· Trust and cohesiveness of the district community
· Equity of programs between buildings
· Rapid change and growth
· Focus on individual achievement
· Willingness and desire to risk and change
· Remaining the educational option of choice
· Developing a shared vision and plan for the future
· Safe and respectful learning environments
· System accountability and measurement of results
3
HOW SHOULD WE PLAN TOGETHER?
Role-alike groups were asked how to involve them in next steps of the planning process.
Groups provided suggestions on how to communicate and engage them.
· Listen
· Invite us in; ask
· Continue discussions by role group (parents, teachers, business, taxpayers)
· Continue mixed stakeholder group discussions
· Go to/involve groups that already exist (community and school organizations)
· Use existing community communication vehicles
· Meaningful, focused, efficient meetings
· Ask us what we think - surveys, focus groups
· Written communication - newsletters, newspaper inserts, brown envelopes to parents
· Advertise opportunities to get involved via all forms of media
· Provide staff time for involvement and shared decision making
· Web site and e-mail groups
· Frequent, regular communication using multiple methods
CONFERENCE FEEDBACK
Participants were asked to complete a feedback form at the end of the day. There were
87 forms received. Themes in response to two questions are included below.
What was vour most important learning today?
· There is much diversity of viewpoints and perspectives.
· We share common ideals and concerns.
· The energy and enthusiasm about education
· Seeing the strengths and challenges of our district
· As we grow dialogue among us becomes increasingly more important.
· Hearing different people's points of view
· There are many and diverse expectations; reaching consensus on direction will be a
challenge.
· How intertwined many of the issues are
· There are tremendous resources in the community who want to be of assistance.
· There was lots of important learning; difficult to identify one thing.
What needs to be done to maintain today's momentum and focus?
· Keep the process going
· Follow-up; stay on track; keep it in front of us
· Keep this group informed and involved
· Communicate, communicate, communicate
· Future similar meetings
· Summarize and report today's work to us, to all staff and community members
· Reach agreement on mission and vision
· Take today's input out to more community members to confirm and prioritize
· Move into action!
4
ST~~~:S~~~G~:n:~IONS ., "~I
.i1.i1 KPJIIH .-. lJII/Jol P' -.il~_ r _/¿I/! l~J.l _____4
co
,
To solicit broader input for District I 12's 15-20 year plan, you can help by:
· scheduling time on the agenda of a staff or community group that regularly meets
during March or April and
· facilitating the meeting discussion and gathering input ITom your group (discussion
guide and materials provided); or
· requesting someone to attend the meeting and gather input.
Name of group/organization
Dateltime/location of March or April meeting
Time on the agenda has been requested for this item:
Yes
No
Your name
Phone
_ I will collect input during this meeting if provided with instructions and materials.
_ Please provide someone to attend the meeting & collect input.
Thanks for your help.
Return the form to:
Betsy Chase
Planning & Organizational Improvement
11 Peavey Road
Chaska, MN 55318
Phone: 556-6241
Fax: 556-6189
E-mail: chaseb@chaska.kI2.mn.us
.
Januarv 29 2000 District 112 Plannina Conference Participants
LAST NAME FIRST NAME GROUP
Baker Bruce Business Leader
Baldus Dennis Princical
Barnes Chervl Tax Paver
Batdorf Debi Teacher
Birklid Sarah Teacher
Bishoc Dave Tax Paver
Borman Nancv Succort Staff
Botcher Scott Communitv, Civic Service
Braun Londa Parents
Brennv Kelli ~- Teacher
Businaro Gino School Board
Carlson Brantlev Student
Chase Betsv Administrator
Chinnock Rorie Parents
Coocer Sandy Business Leader
Crannell Jamie Teacher
Cruse Larrv Parents
Dalv Patrick . Parent
Dilks Nancy Communitv, Civic Service
Dunaev Gayle Tax Paver
Erickson Marv Suooort Staff
Falkenstein Adam Student
Ford Rick Business Leader
Fox Jane Teacher
Frasch Rick Parent
Gale Gillian Teacher
Goodwin Sharon Business Leader
Greoorv Meo Teacher
Griffin Tim Teacher
Hennino June Communitv, Civic Service
Hercules Leslie Business Leader
Hone Barbara Parent
Hromatka Cindv Parent
Huooett Deb Teacher
Hunt Roger Princical
Junaerbera Kathy Teacher
Kaiser Diane Administrator
Kascer Diana Administrator
Kavati Andy Parents
~ ,
January 29,2000 Distñct 112 Conference Participants 1
- ....
~
Kerber Dr. Ellen Parent
Koban Diane Parent
Kocka Steve Parents
Kracke Nancy Administrator
Kraus- Connie Business Leader
Kruchoski Gene Parent
Lawler Charlie Tax Payer
Le Bruce Student
Lechelt David Parent
Leck Trisha Tax Payer
Livers Linda Parents
Lundauist Jarrett Student
Mancino Nancv Communitv, Civic Service
Martens Kris Teacher
Martinson Nancv Parent
Mattson Carl Support Staff
Mattson Gayla Community, Civic Service
McHuah Joe Parent
Menken Bonnie Administrator
Merchant Helen Principal
Miller Jim Principal
Moeller Sharon Tax Payer
Moeller Maria Tax Payer
Monroe Cindy Community, Civic Service
Mueller Jo Parents
Mvhr Julie Teacher
Ness Caroline School Board
O'Connell Jim Principal
Olson Bud Community, Civic Service
Olson Carol Support Staff
Papke Kurt Parent
Paulsen Jim Communitv, Civic Service
Peterson Kent Business Leader
Peterson Darlene Parent
Peterson Dave Administrator
Prois Rodoer Community, Civic Service
Rice Paula Food Service
Roepke Bob Communitv, Civic Service
Rooers Rick Teacher
Rovner Sue Support Staff
Salden Ed Bus Companv
Schazenbach Larrv Parent
Schultz-Barham Aimee Teacher
Sieofried John Community, Civic Service
January 29, 2000 District 112 Conference Participants 2
.' .
Sieole Julie Teacher
Sonenblum Chris Administrator
Stafne Todd or Julie Parents
Stearns Edie Teacher
Stofferahn Bev Administrator
Stone Jennv Tax Paver .
Sutton Beckv Teacher
Tavlor Bill Parent
ThomDson Nicole Teacher
Thul Nancv Assistant PrinciDal
Tirk Dick School Board
Velure Jill Teacher
Von De Bur Kellv School Board
Wack Lou Parent
Waaner Rodd Parent
Walker Bernadette Teacher
Wall Andrea Teacher .
Welch Rob Communitv, Civic Service
Welch Marv School Board
Welter Yvonne Tax Paver
Wenzlaff Gavle Tax Paver
Wittman Nancv Teacher
Wittrock Pat Teacher
Work Daria Teacher
Zemek Chuck Teacher
Vollum John Facilitator
Setterholm Keith Facilitator
January 29, 2000 District 112 Conference Participants 3
.
cc;~
~-ft""·"D
Fit:"it :;);.,r¡""
,,;', ,·/t.-t ~.,~
FEÐ 2 4 2000
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DISTRICT COURT
COUNTY OF CARVER
FIRST JUDICIAL
ClîY Or Cii¡"'\Hì\SS£N
DISTRICT
Robert Rojina,
Court File No:
Plaintiff,
vs.
SUMMONS
City of Chanhassen,
Defendant.
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA TO THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANT:
YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to serve upon Plaintiff's
attorney an Answer to the Complaint which is herewith served upon
you within twenty (20) days after service of this Summons upon you,
exclusive of the day of service. If you fail to do so judgment by
default will be taken against you for the relief demanded in the
Complaint.
Parties are required to attempt alternative dispute
resolution under Minnesota law.
Alternative dispute resolution
includes mediation, arbitration, and other processes as set forth
in the district court rules.
You may contact the court
administrator about resources in your area.
ARLO H.
ande Vegt
Attorney for PIa' tiff
1850 W. Wayzata Blvd.
P.O. Box 39
Long Lake, MN 55356
612/475-2219
By:
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF CARVER
DISTRICT COURT
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
Robert Rojina,
Court File No:
Plaintiff,
vs.
COMPLAINT
City of Chanhassen,
Defendant.
Comes now the plaintiff in the above-entitled action and for
his complaint against the defendant alleges as follows:
PARTIES AND VENUE
1. At all times material hereto plaintiff was and is a
resident of Carver County, Minnesota and the cause(s) of action
herein alleged arose in whole or in part therein.
2. At all times material hereto defendant was and is a
municipality organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota
located within the County of Carver, State of Minnesota.
GENERIC ALLEGATIONS
3. Plaintiff was an "employee" of defendant, working in
defendant's street department, from May of 1989 until March 26,
1999, at which time plaintiff was involuntarily terminated by
defendant through its agents and employees.
4. At the time of plaintiff's termination he suffered from
a "disability" as defined by Minn. Stat. § 363.01 Subd. 13 in that
plaintiff either (1) had a mental impairment which materially
limited one or more major life activities; (2) plaintiff had a
record of such an impairment; and/or (3) plaintiff was regarded as
having such an impairment.
5. Throughout the employment relationship between plaintiff
and defendant, plaintiff was an "employee" as that term is defined
by Minn. Stat. § 363.01 Subd. 16 and defendant was an "employer" as
that term is defined by Minn. Stat. § 363.01 Subd. 17.
6. For a· period of approximately one year prior to
plaintiff's termination plaintiff was a "qualified disabled person"
as that term is defined by Minn; Stat. § 363.01 Subd. 35 in that he
was a "disabled person who, with reasonable accommodation, can
perform the essential functions required of all applicants for the
job in question...".
7. Defendant, through its agents and employees, knew or had
reason to know that plaintiff was a "qualified disabled person"
during the year prior to his termination.
8. Notwithstanding defendant's knowledge of plaintiff's
status as a "qualified disabled person" defendant engaged in
"unfair discriminatory practices" as that term is defined by Minn.
Stat. § 363.01 Subd. 43 and Minn. Stat. § 363.03.
9. Said "unfair discriminatory practices" included the
following:
a. On the basis of disability defendant discharged
plaintiff contrary to Minn. Stat. § 363.03 Subd. 1
(2) (b);
b. On the basis of disability said defendant
discriminated against plaintiff with respect to
hiring, tenure, compensation, terms, upgrading,
conditions, facilities or privileges of employment
by "setting up" plaintiff for discharge during the
last year of his employment contrary to the
provisions of Minn. Stat. § 363.03 Subd. 1(2} (c).
2
10. On or about March 16, 1999, defendant provided plaintiff
with written notice of disciplinary proceedings which requested
that he report to the city hall courtyard conference room at 2:00
p. m. on Wednesday, March 17, 1999, to respond to a series of
alleged charges 'negatively reflecting on his work performance.
said notice advised that plaintiff was free to bring an attorney.
11. Plaintiff appeared at said meeting with his counsel, C.
Scott Massie.
During said meeting plaintiff and his counsel
responded to the allegations against him and openly discussed
plaintiff's mental impairment. Defendant's agents and employees
were advised that to discharge plaintiff given his anxiety and
emotional disorder could constitute disability discrimination in
violation of the law and that plaintiff would oppose such
discriminatory practices.
12. During said meeting of March 17, 1999, defendant's agents
and employees responded that they feared that plaintiff could not
perform the essential job functions of operating equipment.
Plaintiff and his counsel responded that they would provide
information from plaintiff's treating physician on that subject.
13. On March 19, 1999 plaintiff's counsel faxed to defendant
a letter dated March 18, 1999 from David L. Suddeth, M.D.,
plaintiff's treating physician.
Said letter stated in part, as
follows:
A. "...r have identified that Robert is afflicted with
Anxiety Disorder NOS...";
B. " . . . arising out of his anxiety disorder are
symptoms such as severe situational stress...";
3
c.
"...it is my
examination of
that Robert can
a safety hazard
opinion, based upon my initial
Robert and upon his reflections,
function in his job without posing
to co-workers."
14. Defendant,
through
its
agents
and
employees,
intentionally engaged in reprisal against plaintiff for opposing a
practice forbidden under the Minnesota Human Rights Act in that
they discharged him from his employment in whole or in substantial
part in retaliation for his opposition to disability discrimination
contrary to the provisions of Minn. Stat. 363.03 Subd. 7.
COUNT I.
Disabilitv Discrimination - MHRA
15. Plaintiff repleads the allegations of paragraphs 1 - 14.
16. Defendant's discharge of plaintiff was intentional and
was based upon his "...mental impairment which materially limits
one or more major life activities..." and/or his "record of such an
impairment".
17. As a direct result of defendant's intentional and
unlawful discrimination plaintiff has suffered special and general
damages, including loss of wages, loss of employment benefits,
emotional pain and suffering, inconvenience and mental anguish, all
in a reasonable sum in excess of $50,000. Plaintiff is entitled to
recover such damages pursuant to Minn_ Stat. 363.071 Subd. 2.
18. In addition, pursuant to Minn. Stat. 363.071 Subd. 2
plaintiff is entitled to equitable relief to include reinstatement
with back pay and/or injunctive relief.
19. In addition, pursuant to Minn. Stat. 363.071 Subd. 2
plaintiff is entitled to punitive damages in an amount of up to
$8,500.
4
20. In addition, pursuant to Minn. Stat. 363.071 Subd. 2
and/or 363.14 Subd. 3 plaintiff is entitled to an award of
reasonable attorneys fees, costs and disbursements.
COUNT II.
"Perceived" Disabilitv Discrimination- MHRA
21. Alternatively, plaintiff repleads the allegations of
paragraphs 1 - 14.
22_ Defendant, through its agents and employees, discharged
plaintiff from his employment because he was ".. . regarded as having
such an impairment", namely, a mental impairment which materially
limits one or more major life activities.
23. As a direct result of defendant's intentional and
unlawful discrimination plaintiff has suffered special and general
damages, including loss of wages, loss of employment benefits,
emotional pain and suffering, inconvenience and mental anguish, all
in a reasonable sum in excess of $50,000. Plaintiff is entitled to
recover such damages pursuant to Minn. Stat. 363.071 Subd. 2.
24. In addition, pursuant to Minn. Stat. 363.071 Subd. 2
plaintiff is entitled to equitable relief to include reinstatement
with back pay and/or injunctive relief.
25. In addition, pursuant to Minn. Stat. 363.071 Subd. 2
plaintiff is entitled to punitive damages in an amount of up to
$8,500.
26. In addition, pursuant to Minn. Stat. 363.071 Subd. 2
and/or 363 _14 Subd. 3 plaintiff is entitled to an award of
yeasonable attorneys fees, costs and disbursements.
5
COUNT III.
Retaliatorv Discharae - MHRA
27. Plaintiff repleads the allegations of paragraphs 1 - 14.
28. Defendant, through its agents and employees, illegally
engaged in a retaliatory discharge of plaintiff contrary to the
provisions of Minn. Stat. 363.03 Subd. 7 because plaintiff opposed
disability discrimination at the meeting of March 17, 1999 and
thereafter.
29. As a direct and proximate result of such illegal
retaliation plaintiff has suffered special and general damages,
including loss of wages, loss of employment benefits, emotional
pain and suffering, inconvenience and mental anguish, all in a
reasonable sum in excess of $50,000.
Plaintiff is entitled to
recover such damages pursuant to Minn. Stat. 363.071 Subd. 2.
30. In addition pursuant to Minn. Stat. 363.071 Subd. 2
plaintiff is entitled to equitable relief to include reinstatement
with back pay and/or injunctive relief.
31. In addition, pursuant to Minn. Stat. 363.071 Subd. 2
plaintiff is entitled to punitive damages in an amount of up to
$8,500.
32. In addition, pursuant to Minn. Stat. 363.071 Subd. 2
and/or 363.14 Subd. 3 plaintiff is entitled to an award of
reasonable attorneys fees, costs and disbursements.
COUNT IV.
civil Penal tv - MHRA
33. Plaintiff repleads all allegations of this complaint.
6
34. Defendant should be ordered to pay a civil penalty to the
State of Minnesota taking into account the seriousness and extent
of the violation[s],
the public harm occasioned by the
violation[s], whether the violation[s] was/were intentional, and
the financial resources of defendant, all pursuant to Minn. Stat.
363.01 Subd. 2.
WHEREFORE, plaintiff prays for judgment against defendant as
follows:
A. Awarding to him damages in a reasonable sum in excess of
$50,000 pursuant to Counts I, II and/or III.
B. Awarding to him appropriate equitable relief to include
injunctive relief and/or reinstatement with back pay pursuant to
Counts I, II and III.
C. Awarding to him punitive damages in the amount of $8,500.
D. Awarding to him reasonable attorneys fees. costs and
disbursements.
E_ Awarding the State of Minnesota an appropriate civil
penalty pursuant to Count IV.
F. Awarding plaintiff his costs and disbursements herein.
ARLO H.
#112045
Attorney for PI tiff
1850 W. Wayzata Blvd.
P.O. Box 39
Long Lake, MN 55356
612/475-2219
By:
7
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The undersigned acknowledges that reasonable attorneys fees,
witness fees, costs and disbursements may be awarded to t
side pursuant to Minn. Stat. 549.211.
8
~ Metropolitan Council
~ Working for the Region, Planning for the Future
cc.: Cø~.. \
~
February 29, 2000
Environmental Services
MCES PLANNING AND BUDGET BREAKFAST MEETINGS
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) is holding breakfast meetings in advance of preparing its
2001 budgets. These meetings provide communities and industries an opportunity to comment on and help plan
for and prioritize current issues, services and direction. This year, 2000, is year two of a three-year $20 million
budget reduction goal and MCES remains on-track to reach this goal in 2001. Your comments and participation in
the discussion at these planning meetings is important.
This year, comments and discussion will be focused on:
· Strategic Development: Smart Growth Alignment
- Strategic planning frameworks (alignment with Governor's plans/Council's planslMCES's plans)
- Regional environmental agenda to be developed with stakeholder involvement in 2000
- MCES's 2000 and 2001 goals
· Customer Focus: Regional Constituency Building
- Legislative initiatives (e.g. SAC/system equity)
- Customer survey follow-up/implementation: meter/billing accuracy, and odors
· Water Resources Management: Quality of Life
- Comprehensive strategies for targeted pollutants
- Master planning (including potential capital investments and strategies to reduce capital costs)
- Grants (e.g., MetroEnvironment Partnership grant program)
- Beyond MUSA study areas
· Competitive Business Processes: High Perfonnance Service
- Rates continue to decrease to meet 200 I goal
- New goal of being among top best five in retail rates of peer agencies by 2005
Follow-up meetings will be held in June to consider the draft MCES 2001 Budget and 2001-2006 Plan for
Allocating Resources (PAR). Our current schedule anticipates a public hearing at a July Metropolitan Council
meeting.
We will hold three meetings (listed below). Please make reservations by calling Katie Elliott at
(651) 602-1016; leave your name and affiliation and identify the meeting you will attend.
SCHEDULE FOR MCES PLANNING AND BUDGET BREAKFAST MEETINGS
(Maps to all three locations are included)
Tuesday, March 14: 7:30 a.m. }
Maplewood Community Center Focus of this meeting
2100 White Bear Avenue planned for industrial users
Mapfewood, MN
Wednesday, March 22: 7:30 a.m.
Bloomington City Hall
2215 W. Old Shakopee Road
Bloomington, MN
Thursday, March 23: 7:45 a.m. (NOTE: Later start time for this location)
Brooklyn Park City Hall Chambers
5200-85'" Avenue North
Brooklyn Park, MN
For more information about MCES, visit our website at:
www.metrocouncil.org/environmentlindex.htm
230 East Fifth Slrc('Í
Sf. Paul. Minnesota 55101-1626
(651) 602-1005
Fax 602-] ]83
TDD/TrY 229-3760
Maplewood
Community Center
2100 White Bear Avenue
Maplewood, Minnesota
Phone: (651) 779-3555
Tuesday, March 14
7:30 a.m.
W--$--E
S
Co. Rd.S
CD
...
~
:J:
w
II)
M
....
....
CD
~
:J:
H 5
From the North: South on Hwy 35E to Hwy 61, south to
Hwy 36. East on Hwy 36 to White Bear Avenue. South on
White Bear Avenue about 1/2 mile to the Center.
From the South: Norih on Hwy 494/694 to Hwy 36. West
on Hwy 36 to White Bear Avenue. South on White Bear
Avenue about 1/2 mile to the Center.
From the East: West on Hwy 36 to White Bear Avenue.
South on White Bear Avenue about 1/2 mile to the Center.
Or: West on Hwy 94 to Hwy 494/694. North to Hwy 36.
West on Hwy 36 to White Bear Avenue. South on White
Bear Avenue about 1/2 mile to the center.
From the West.: East on Hwy 694 to White Bear Avenue.
South on White Bear Avenue, about 2 miles to the Center.
Or: East on Hwy 94 to Hwy 35E. North on Hwy 35E to Hwy
36. East on Hwy 36 to White Bear Avenue. South on White
Bear Avenue about 1/2 mile to the Center.
1-694
Hwy 36
O Community
Center
C>
N
....
Hwy 212
~
:J:
...
CD
~
ai
~
..
'"
OJ
III
OJ
-
:E
~
1-94
Bloomington
City Hall Chambers
2215 W. Old Shakopee Road
Bloomington, MN
(612) 424-8000
Wednesday, March 22
7:30 a.m.
ti
II:'
~
.!J
g
tn
Ili
-g
iñ
.c
UI
:J
III
~
-
-
:J5
XI
z
I'CI
1!
I'CI
E
5
z
N
,
W--$--E
,
s
From 35W, exit at 98th Street. Go west on 98th
Street. Follow the curve to the left which turns
into Old Shakopee Road. Turn left at the next
light into the parking lot of City Hall at the
intersection of Old Shakopee Road and Penn
Avenue.
GI 90th.
~
GI ai
I!! ~ 4th. St
I! c
LL 5i
98th. St. II.
.
Bloomington
City Hall
>
<C
Ie
'5!
102nd. S .
82nd. St.
86nd. St.
~ ~
<C
-; C
I'CI
'ð i!
u 0
Z II.
GI
~
GI
1ã
'E
>-
....
Brooklyn Park
City Hall Chambers
520Q-85th Avenue North
Brooklyn Park, MN
(612) 424-8000
Brooklyn Park City Hall is located 2.5 miles west
of Highway 252 on 85th Avenue.
30 93rd Ave.
N
,
W--$--E
,
s
Brooklyn Park
City Hall
86th Ave.
85th Ave. @
Thursday, March 23, 2000
7:45 a.m. (NOTE: later start time for this location)
...
o
e
.c
~
o
"0
to
Q)
:;¡
cü
>
<I:
Q)
c
r!:!
~
%
~
.,
~
;<.
<?"
cü
~
-
c
Q)
g>
a:
cü
~
Q)
3
o
z
@
@
c
~
CARVER
COUNTY
MICHAEL A. FAHEY
CARVER COUNTY ATTORNEY
Government Center. Justice CCllt!.?r
600 East Fourth Street
Chaska. I\'1innesota 5531 R-21 SX
(612) 361-1-100
(612)361·1-113 Fax
Chief Deput) County Attorney
Kar; L.S. Myrold
Law OtTIee Coordinator
Christopher Weldon
Civil Division
Robert G. Hendricks. Head
Mclissa A. Rossow
Edith M. Anderson. Parakgal
Ju\'cnilc Division
Janet L. Barke Cain. I lead
Kcvin G. Ccucrgrcn
Enclosed you will find a breakdO\\11 of the fine revenue for all the cities we prosecute for in CaIVer Count)'
for 1999 and 1998. If you have all)" questions. plc~)sc let me know.
Criminal Division
PCIL'r h·y. "L'~!J
Tara E. f\.cL'hr
i\brtha E. Matthds
Sharon D. :\ilL'r
Carril: Daklin. Parakgal
"ktim \\ïlnt'ss Cuordinator
i\ aHey E. Ya(es
To; Scott Boettcher. Chanhassen City Administrator, Chief Scott Knight, Sheriff Bud Olson
From: Mike Fahey )\{¡ k'
Re; Fine Revenue for 1998 and 1999 per prosecntion contracts
Date; Fcbmary 28, 20:10
;.F,,;,
:·,Ì-II.'i'/,'r!'1
.
....'
interoffice
MEMORANDUM
~'j.t":l J;;~~,7.'-' " I ' \,
to:
from:
subject:
date:
Mike Fahey, Kari Myrold
Chris Weldon cP-
Fine revenue for 1998 & 1999
February 27, 2000
Attached you will find a copy of the fine revenue numbers from 1999. I got these numbers from a
report generated in Court Administration and given to me by Carol Renn. As in 1998, I broke it
down by city and township and by month. The numbers reflect the cities share and our share. Per
Carol Renn, the breakdown of fine revenue is as follows, the state gets 20% off the top of the
total amount. The cities then get one third and the county gets two thirds of the amount. Of the
amount going to the county, our office gets one half and the county gets one ha1f.
As in 1998 I am unable to get the figures court administration gave me to match the number
reflected in the Revenues and Expenditures Report. This could be that all figures are not in when
. the Revenue report was generated. In any event if you look on page three of the printout titled
Fine Revenue 1999, you will see the breakdown by city and by month. You will also see total fine
revenue for 1999. I have also included a copy of the Fine Revenue for 1999 and page three from
Ihe Fine Revenue 1998 report for comparison.
The Revenues and Expenditures Report is generated by the county and I print it off the FPreport
option. The Fine Revenue 1999 and 1998 report is a spreadsheet I developed in Excel to try and
track this information by city.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
~.,.-..(
FINE REVENUE 1999
DATE CITY SHARE PROSECUTION SHARE
Jan-99 $153.96 $154.03
Feb-99 $148.63 $148.70
Mar-99 $173.95 $174.03
Anr-99 $63.99 $64.01
Mav-99 $125.58 $125.62
Jun-99 $298.69 $298.76
Jul-99 $69.97 $70.02
Aua-99 $25.00 $25.00
Sep-99 $138.66 $138.68
Oct-99 $36.66 $36.67
Nav-99 $71.99 $72.01
Dec-99 $42.67 $42.67
TOTAL 51,349.75 $1.350.20
CARVER
DATE CITY SHARE PROSECUTION SHARE
Jan-99 $1,361.83 $1.362.37
Feb-99 $1,219.38 $1,219.70
Mar-99 $1,241.09 $1,241.52
Anr-99 $1,951.76 $1,952.28
May-99 $1,738.10 $1,738.48
Jun-99 $2,214.54 $2.215.36
Jul-99 $1,544.60 $1,545.30
Aug-99 $1,771.80 $1,772.41
Sep-99 $1,327.44 $1,327.87
Oct-99 $1,906.58 $1.907.31
Nov-99 $1,390.46 $1,390.85
Dec-99 $1.157.22 $1.157.49
TOTAL $18.824.80 $18,830.94
CHAN
DATE CITY SHARE PROSECUTION SHARE
Jan-99 $0.00 $0.00
Feb-99 $0.00 $0.00
Mar-99 $6.66 $6.67
Ai>f-99 $26.67 $26.67
Mav-99 $23.33 $23.34
Jun-99 $48.00 $48.00
Jul-99 $30.00 $30.00
Aug-99 $20.00 $20.00
Sep-99 $33.33 $33.34
Oct-99 $50.00 $50.00
Nov-99 $0.00 $0.00
Dec-99 $6.66 $6.67
TOTAL $244.65 $244.69
NEW GERMY
DATE CITY SHARE PROSECUTION SHARE
Jan-99 $324.52 $324.75
Feb-99 $331 .28 $331.40
Mar-99 $238.63 $238.70
Apr-99 $285.32 $285.36
May-99 $141.99 $142.02
Jun-99 $183.32 $183.35
Jul-99 $201.31 $201.36
Aug-99 $372.96 $373.05
Sep-99 $123.33 $123.34
Oct-99 $144.00 $144.01
Nov-99 $77.99 $78.01
Dec-99 $40.00 $40.01
TOTAL $2,464.65 $2,465.36
NYA
Page 1
"ç
CHASKA COLOGNE
DATE CITY SHARE PROSECUTION SHARE DATE CITY SHARE PROSECUTION SHARE
Jan-99 $3,441.21 $3,442.26 Jan-99 $119.33 $119.34
Feb-99 $3,096.79 $3,099.96 Feb-99 $31.97 $32.02
Mar-99 $4,175.56 $4,176.99 Mar-99 $55.32 $55.36
Apr-99 $3,693.46 $3,694.42 Apr-99 $429.97 $430.02
Mav-99 $3,473.55 $3,474.29 May-99 $31.66 $31.67
Jun-99 $5,369.45 $5,391.00 Jun-99 $26.67 $26.67
Jul-99 $3,640.35 $3,641.33 Jul-99 $60.00 $60.00
AUQ-99 $5,416.09 $5,417.66 Aua-99 $20.00 $20.00
Sep-99 $3,616.11 $3,619.26 Seo-99 $20.60 $20.60
Oct-99 $4,499.15 $4,500.35 Oct-99 $33.33 $33.34
Nov-99 $3,140.34 $3,141.04 Nov-99 $100.00 $100.00
Dec-99 $3,360.75 $3,361.51 Dec-99 $53.33 $53.34
TOTAL $47,346.65 $47,360.13 TOTAL $1,002.36 $1,002.56
VIC WACONIA
DATE CITY SHARE PROSECUTION SHARE DATE CITY SHARE PROSECUTION SHARE
Jan-99 $140.00 $140.00 Jan-99 $636.95 $639.24
Feb-99 $156.64 $156.69 Feb-99 $679.54 $679.76
Mar-99 $333.24 $333.39 Mar-99 $566.11 $566.39
Apr-99 $125.31 $125.35 . Apr-99 $629.24 $629.47
Mav-99 $201.32 $201.35 May-99 $574.26 $574.40
Jun-99 $209.95 $210.03 Jun-99 $446.63 $446.76
Jul-99 $169.13 $169.19 Jul-99 $667.30 $667.39
Auo-99 $264.96 $265.03 Aug-99 $316.22 $316.32
Sep-99 $56.66 $56.66 Seo-99 $473.61 $473.73
Oct-99 $173.30 $173.36 Oct-99 $369.55 $369.66
Nov-99 $226.65 $226.66 Nov-99 $201.26 $201.36
Dec-99 $260.63 $260.70 Dec-99 $255.29 $255.36
TOTAL $2,323.61 $2,324.45 TOTAL $6,240.00 $6,241.90
Page 2
DATE CITY SHARE PROSECUTION SHARE
Jan-99 $5.00 $5.00
Feb-99 $20.00 $20.00
Mar-99 $40.00 $40.00
Apr-99 $0.00 $0.00
MaY-99 $0.00 $0.00
Jun-99 $16.66 $16.67
Jul-99 $0.00 $0.00
AUQ-99 $53.33 $53.34
Sep-99 $0.00 $0.00
Oct-99 $0.00 $0.00
Nay-99 $0.00 $0.00
Dee-99 $0.00 $0.00
TOTAL $134.99 $135.01
HAMBURG
DATE CITY SHARE PROSECUTION SHARE
Jan-99 $0.00 $0.00
Feb-99 $5.33 $5.34
Mar-99 $33.33 $33.34
Acr-99 $59.98 $60.02
MaY-99 $0.00 $0.00
Jun-99 $77.33 $77.35
Jul-99 $26.67 $26.67
AUQ-99 $0.00 $0.00
Sep-99 $0.00 $0.00
Oct·99 $0.00 $0.00
NoY-99 $0.00 . $0.00
Dee-99 $26.67 $26.67
TOTAL $229.31 $229.39
MAYER
DATE CITY SHARE PROSECUTION SHARE
Jan-99 $183.30 $183.36
F eb-99 $106.65 $106.68
Mar-99 $276.37 $276.42
Acr-99 $43.33 $43.34
MaY-99 $83.33 $83.34
Jun-99 $190.00 $190.00
Jul-99 $162.16 $162.17
Aun-99 $367.56 $367.75
Sep-99 $86.66 $86.67
Oct-99 $374.90 $375.06
NaY-99 $135.30 $135.37
Dee-99 $166.63 $166.69
TOTAL $2.176.19 $2,176.85
L'TOWN
DATE CITY SHARE PROSECUTION SHARE
Jan-99 $384.06 $384.18
Feb-99 $335.99 $336.03
Mar-99 $518.57 $518.63
Acr-99 $162.66 $162.70
MaY-99 $217.32 $217.35
Jun-99 $341.62 $341.71
Jul-99 $242.31 $242.35
Aug-99 $297.30 $297.38
Sap-99 $88.00 $88.01
Oct-99 $96.66 $96.68
NaY-99 $168.65 $168.69
Dec·99 $55.31 $55.35
TOTAL $2,908.45 $2,909.06
W'TOWN
CITY CITY SHARE PROSECUTION SHARE
CARVER $1,349.75 $1,350.20
CHAN $18,824.80 $18,830.94
CHASKA $47,346.85 $47,360.13
COLOGNE $1.002.38 $1,002.56
HAMBURG $134.99 $135.01
MAYER $229.31 $229.39
N.G. $244.65 $244.69
NYA $2,464.65 $2,465.36
VIC $2,323.81 $2,324.45
WAC $6,240.00 $6,241.90
L'TOWN $2,176.19 $2,176.85
WTOWN $2,908.45 $2,909.06
TOTAL r $85,245.83 $85,270.54
TOTAL 99
TOTAL FINE REVENUE FOR 1999
$170,516.37
Page 3
FINE REVENUE 1998
DATE CITY SHARE PROSECUTION SHARE
Jan-98 $210.23 $210.29
Feb-98 $121.66 $121.67
Mar-98 $150.76 $150.82
Aor-98 $66.66 $66.67
Mav-98 $266.66 $266.67
Jun-98 $265.26 $265.38
Jul-98 $174.62 $174.71
Aua-98 $25.99 $26.01
Seo-98 $132.52 $132.55
Oct-98 $103.30 $103.36
Nav-98 $43.31 $43.35
Dec-98 $324.26 $324.39
TOTAL $1,885.23 $1,885.87
CARVER
DATE CITY SHARE PROSECUTION SHARE
Jan-98 $2,530.96 $2,531.63
Feb-98 $1,461.30 $1,461.59
Mar-98 $1,934.40 $1,934.97
Apr-98 $2,079.39 $2,079.88
Mav-98 $1,708.06 $1,708.55
Jun-98 $2,111.17 $2,111.76
Jul-98 $2,368.70 $2,369.59
Aua-98 $813.74 $814.24
Sep-98 $1,260.96 $1,261.57
Oct-98 $2,353.24 $2,353.97
Nov-98 $1,243.38 $1,243.85
Dec-98 $1,508.52 $1 ,508.96
TOTAL $21,373.82 $21,380.56
CHAN
DATE CITY SHARE PROSECUTION SHARE
Jan-98 $46.66 $46.67
Feb-98 $25.31 $25.35
Mar-98 $95.99 $96.01
Apr-98 $33.33 $33.34
Mav-98 $0.00 $0.00
Jun-98 $18.67 $18.67
Jul-98 $39.99 $40.01
Auo-98 $43.33 $43.34
Sep-98 $36.65 $36.68
Oct-98 $83.32 $83.35
Nov-98 $56.66 $56.67
Dec-98 $40.00 $40.00
TOTAL $519.91 $520.09
NEW GERMY
DATE CITY SHARE PROSECUTION SHARE
Jan-98 $72.92 $72.94
Feb-98 $69.30 $69.36
Mar-98 $76.66 $76.67
Apr-98 $103.99 $104.02
May-98 $63.72 $63.75
Jun-98 $130.53 $130.55
Jul-98 $42.65 $42.68
Aua-98 $171.43 $171.51
Sep-98 $180.18 $180.24
Oct-98 $268.30 $268.37
Nov-98 $368.61 $368.71
Dec-98 $251.61 $251.72
TOTAL $1,799.90 $1,800.52
NYA
Page 1
CHASKA
DATE CITY SHARE PROSECUTION SHARE
Jan-98 $3,462.32 $3,463.21
Feb-98 $2,248.18 $2,248.84
Mar-98 $3,339.01 $3,339.97
Apr-98 $2,477.57 $2,478.13
May-98 $1,998.73 $1,999.39
Jun-98 $2,687.90 $2,688.71
Jul-98 $3,258.72 $3,259.69
Aug-98 $3,371.98 $3,373.02
SeD-98 $3,527.47 $3,528.48
Oct-98 $3,486.19 $3,487.47
Nov-98 $3,404.26 $3,405.25
Dec-98 $4,438.11 $4,439.57
TOTAL $37,700.44 $37,711.73
VIC
DATE CITY SHARE PROSECUTION SHARE
Jan-98 $179.66 $179.73
Feb-98 $273.99 $274.07
Mar-98 $325.94 $326.04
Apr-98 $493.98 $494.04
May-98 $165.34 $165.34
Jun-98 $471.22 $471.32
Jul-98 $356.61 $356.71
Aug-98 $159.97 $160.04
SeD-98 $179.98 $180.02
Oct-98 $247.29 $247.37
Nov-98 $443.27 $443.37
Dec-98 $375.96 $376.03
TOTAL $3,673.21 $3,674.08
COLOGNE
DATE CITY SHARE PROSECUTION SHARE
Jan-98 $80.00 $80.00
Feb-98 $63.33 $63.34
Mar-98 $20.00 $20.00
Apr-98 $100.80 $100.80
Mav-98 $93.33 $93.39
Jun-98 $0.00 $0.00
Jul-98 $38.66 $38.68
Auo-98 $53.33 $53.34
SeD-98 $0.00 $0.00
Oct-98 $36.66 $36.67
Nov-98 $40.00 $40.00
Dec-98 $63.99 $64.01
TOTAL $590.10 $590.23
WACONIA
DATE CITY SHARE PROSECUTION SHARE
Jan-98 $614.03 $614.24
Feb-98 $748.02 $748.28
Mar-98 $767.25 $767.43
Apr-98 $360.27 $360.39
Mav-98 $947.17 $947.36
Jun-98 $1,036.73 $1,036.88
Jul-98 $1,107.01 $1,107.39
Auo-98 $814.01 $814.30
Sen:-98 $502.86 $503.13
Oct-98 $994.96 $995.19
Nov-98 $1,445.00 $1,445.60
Dec-98 $990.16 $990.50
TOTAL $10,327.47 $10,330.69
Page 2
HAMBURG
DATE CITY SHARE PROSECUTION SHARE
Jan-98 $0.00 $0.00
Feb-98 $38.67 $38.67
Mar-98 $16.66 $16.67
ADr-98 $0.00 $0.00
May-98 $13.33 $13.34
Jun-98 $33.33 $33.34
Jul-98 $16.66 $16.67
Aug-98 $33.33 $33.34
Sep-98 $26.67 $26.67
Oct-98 $16.67 $16.67
Nov-98 $0.00 $0.00
Dec-98 $6.66 $6.67
TOTAL $201.98 $202.04
L'TOWN
DATE CITY SHARE PROSECUTION SHARE
Jan-98 $211.32 $211.36
Feb-98 $190.65 $190.69
Mar·98 $441.95 $442.05
Apr-98 $153.21 $153.35
May-98 $259.32 $259.35
Jun-98 $204.96 $205.03
Jul-98 $302.61 $302.71
Aug-98 $224.62 $224.70
Sep-98 $169.96 $170.03
Oct-98 $295.30 $295.36
Nov-98 $143.33 $143.34
Dec-98 $13.33 $13.34
TOTAL $2,610.56 $2,611.31
TOTAL 98
DATE CITY SHARE PROSECUTION SHARE
CARVER $1,885.23 $1,885.87
CHAN $21,373.82 $21,380.56
CHASKA $37,700.44 $37,711.73
COLOGNE $590.10 $590.23
HAMBURG $201.98 $202.04
MAYER $538.30 $538.37
N.G. $519.91 $520.09
NYA $1,799.90 $1,800.52
VIC $3,673.21 $3,674.08
WAC $10,327.47 $10,330.69
L'TOWN $2,610.56 $2,611.31
WTOWN $3,184.07 $3,184.97
TOTAL I $84,404.99 $84,430.46
MAYER
DATE CITY SHARE PROSECUTION SHARE
Jan-98 $6.66 $6.67
Feb-98 $13.33 $13.34
Mar-98 $63.33 $63.34
Apr-98 $0.00 $0.00
Mav-98 $286.66 $286.67
Jun-98 $33.33 $33.34
Jul-98 $40.00 $40.00
Auo-98 $28.33 $28.34
Sep-98 $0.00 $0.00
Oct-98 $26.66 $26.67
Nov-98 $40.00 $40.00
Dec-98 $0.00 $0.00
TOTAL $538.30 $538.37
W'TOWN
DATE CITY SHARE PROSECUTION SHARE
Jan-98 $239.29 $239.37
Feb·98 $179.30 $179.36
Mar-98 $399.28 $399.37
Apr-98 $325.63 $325.70
May-98 $295.95 $296.06
Jun-98 $140.65 $140.69
Jul-98 $470.26 $470.38
Aua-98 $205.64 $205.70
Sep-98 $227.30 $227.38
Oct-98 $201.17 $201.23
Nav-98 $169.97 $170.03
Dec-98 $329.63 $329.70
TOTAL $3,184.07 53,184.97
TOTAL FINE REVENUE FOR 1998
$168,835.45
Page 3
Z~~
tr:IX~
""'<
"'...,
AO'"
...."'....
ow'"
",ow
O,N 0"1
1-'1.:1 CO
o
~
·
"''''W
",,,,W
........'"
AW'"
...,"'....
W....'"
0"'....
WO...,
n
"
(7\~N
"'A'"
W.......
OWW
...,...,0
,b~O
000
COO
o
"
'" "
v trJ
'" <
'" '"
000000000000000000000000000000002:0000000002:
1-'1-'1-'1-' 1-'1-'1-'1-'1-'1-'1-'1-'1-'1-'1-'1-' 1-'1-'1-' I-' I-' I-' I-' I-' I-' 1-'1-' I-' I-' I-' I-' I-' Ö 1-'1-'1-' I-' I-' I-' I-' I-' I-' C
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . I I H I I I I I I I I It=]
000000000000000000000000000000008000000000~
~W~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~W~~~~~W~~~~~~~~C~~~~~~~~~
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~OOOOOOOOO
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I tr:Il I I I I I I I I
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~OOOOOOOOO
00000000000000000000000000000000 000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000 000000000
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
00000000000000000000000000000000 000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000 000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000 000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000 000000000
11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm ~~~~~~~~~
mmÞÞÞÞWWWWWWNNNNNNNNNl-'l-'l-'l-'l-'l-'l-'l-'l-'l-'1-' ~~WWWWWNI-'
Nm~NI-'I-'~ÞWWWI-'C~mm~Þ~I-'I-'~~~m~~~1-'1-'1-'1-' ~~WWNNNO~
NOWI-'I-'O~mNI-'OOmI-'I-'OmWNNI-'~WNN~~NmWNI-' m~NI-'~WNI-'~
·
·
·
'"
co
°
"
'"
'"
"
"
o
"
>
t'
'"
>
"
"
o
"
Z
'"
..
>tr:I~~~00~0~8~8X~~~~X~8~~~~~~~~~~~
81Otr:108~8tr:10X>t=:Itr:ltr:ltr:I~CCtr:lOtr:lOO' . Mtr:ltr:ltr:I)'»
8C~O>~~~Z~X~XC~O~~X~~Z~Htr:lÖÖ><~~~
OHNC1-3Htr:I<f'Ij~>)ot;;JH>"'J"Ø(f)~I-itr:lø,.;· . HH~tr:I»>
~~~ HO~Htr:lO~HOO~NOOtr:l>~1tr:l0~nn8~~~~
ZXtr:I>'Ot'J O~I-(t-t::ø,,> ~tr:I~~(j ::é8"·· »~)lHHH
tr:I[:]ZZZ Xtr:ltr:lt"Itr:I >~~(f)ZH(ntr:lOt'il -)'>"t:'f Ztr:lt'Jtr:I
I-(znC>~H Ztr:I >::ø tr:IH)'''Ø::é z,,~· tr:I >n(f)~~
8tr:1 ::øc(n>n XZ~~~O 8H~tr:lX ~Ztr:l
n ~1-(~n(j tr:lX~c t=:I<Z H~ n 00 )I)')'
O)lttlt>J ~t'J~.. H)o to1::øH)' 0 "O)'ÖO 0 )lZ2:Z
ZZO<)'~~tr:I t-tt-tXX<Ot-t ZÖOZHX t:'ft-tt-tÖCC
~COtr:lZH~tr:I~tr:I )'~H~ ~C~C~~ H~
H ";~Ötr:l>x::ø)l::øH~n~~ tr:I8)1tr:1 ~O~~~
Z~(n> ~Ztr:lO(j ~ZOtr:l ~)'8~Z tr:I~»>
ØC (j "'J tr:IZf'ljtr:lH8~~ I--) ~tr:lH~ )'~(j ø
tr:I~~tr:lO Ol--)tr:I Xtr:lX tr:I t-tt-t)' HZtr:ltr:ltr:I
ZZ ~"C~~>~Ztr:I n ttI~HI--) zn~~~
t-3Ht-t X ~ tn~C>~ :c OÇ)8H ~tlJl I I
I--)H ~ Ht-t~Z~ X~~O C O~~
C~ ~ OOtnO )I Z ~ <>~
~~ ~ Z~~~> ~ ~'" "'~~
tr:I~ ~ »~ ø tr:I M::é ::ø~
::ø tIJ ~Z~ ~ tr:I Z n ~
~~ Z OZ Z ~ 1-3 tIJ H8Z
C ~ ~tIJ~ n > ~H~
"X ~ > H "'J t-t tr:I:S:Z
n> ~ H ~ 0 tlJl--)
:t~ Z tn "
>'" "
~~ ~ tn
tr:IH Z tIJ
> > ~
t-t Z <
'" n ....
~ n
'"
'"
nX~~«cn~
OH,,:OHt:J::øO:C
,,~oon::cc:c:o
~n~~t-3H"Z~
tz:Itr:ltz:ltz:lHn ~O
nt-tnnXt-tf'lj~n
~t-tC:C t=10 0
H>8~~ ")'~
O:<!:HHH"1,",,: ~~
Ztr:l0080~>-:1
~OZZZ"HO">:
c; t<P'IJ~"tr:I
>~nnli':lt=]C:Zt":l
H OOtnH~t":I~
ÖOU)Z !-3tr:1l-(
I--) I--) >-i.., C"'1
"''''~~"
tr:I )I~tr:I
::ø n~~
"
~
'" "
< '"
'" <
Z '"
c: Z
'" c:
'"
~
'"
t'
;;
~
'"
n
'"
>
"
'"
'"
'"
'" '"
.... WW '" 0 '" C"
..., ........'" A'" .... '" A"'''' A "'....'" W "'.... ..., "''''
'" m~O'IcnccN 0 ° "'0'" "'0 A"'''' '" "'''' '" ....~
'" ....J......,bO\WO '" W "''''''' "'..., O'I"'''W ..., WW ... "''''
OO~ONwo~~~aNOO,bO~OOONO'IO~ONO~OO~CC
OO,bOWO\N~~CCO~OO~OOOOO~OO~~WOCCOOO~
.... ....
'" 0
.... ....
Wt...........ON
'"
ÞWI-' ~ (.1'0\
Þ N~OI-'~,b ~I-'
~,bWN(J'I
........ ..
.. .. .. .. ..
.. .. .. .. .. ..
....
'"
'"
...,
N
'"
~(.I'~~WN N(J'I ~WO'lWN ~N
œOWNI-'O ~O'IN~NmCC~,bm~
~~O~~OW~~"",,~(.f'(.f'WN"""~~
~~N~~~.....mm
W~\OO(.f',bO'l~O
o~oo~~~~m
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
,bomO~~O,bCCN~~~Om,b(.f'~,bm~.....omN(.f'~W~W~O
oowOwœNmWO'l~N~O~I-'OOI-'W~CCO~W~(.f'''''''~CC~CC
·
N
'" '"
.... ....
NW~wON
....
~CCWN~
AW '"
~"""f\J~\DWI.D
.......... ..
........ ..
.. .. .. .. .. .. ..
t."~AL"~f\J~~~~ N
o 0 N 0 a U\ .c. 0 lfI 0 c.."
OOIJ'lOOONOOO 0
lfI O(.."U'I~~(J'I ~I-'WWI-'CXI\OO
OOOOOoooctl~oml.Dm~
OOoooOOOm.c.NONO\D
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .
00000000000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000
·
~........ I-' I-' I-' ...... I-'t-'I-
~~w cc N WO~~~cc 0 mt~o~~ wee OOOA~ \D
_~~0 (.f'O~O~N~~CCCCOWObow~~a'CC~NOI-'N~COCCOOO~
~O\DooaOOO
(.... 0 N ..... 0 0 0 0 0
o 00
;::::: ,,:r
....
m.......~ 0'1
\ONN\O..... W\O
........ ..
~-.J~CC~
\=>mlJ'l,bO'l
~....J.....WO
"'....
....'"
"'....'"
. . . . . .
~m~ccOO~NO
~-.lf\JccOOOV'O
nnnnn non
",,~,,::c ~,,~
'"
'"
'"
....
'"
........0
'" '"
1.:).....1"...1(.1'
W
°
...
O~OOWOOO(.f'
000000000
000000000
. . . . .
000000000
000000000
nnnnnnnnn
;:::::~:o",,""7J;:::::
1-1-'::'1- e, WI-
o c:o f\J N L~ c, .:-.
I-t..,t..r.w·-'ol-.......-
>
o
o
o
c:
Z
"
Z
c:
:;:
to
'"
~
"
'"
'"
o
"
....
'"
"
....
o
Z
'"
"
>
"
c:
'"
....
...,....
..,
WO
0'"
..,
1."0
(1)0
:>' '"
1-i0tIJ
1--)\o.~ZO
o or;;:¡......
!:!,,~'"
t'1t'1t"'C:
..'" Z
""0
'"
<
'"
Z
c:
'"
¿t.,
Zo-:
"0
""
'"
°
....
~
'"
<
'"
Z....
c:Z
"'8
c..,t':
'"
~~
"'''0
~"'>
"'0'"
'" <
Zf'1jt':!
0...."
HZ
">0
c:ZO
~Oc:
tr,HZ
c..1 )'J-'3
t-tl-:
to
c:"
t:;!1-:
ø c..-:
"'''
"'"
:;:
....
~~
0....
c:",
Z'"
"'"
"
'"
~
'"
o
"
'"
:;:"
z"
"0
=~
'"
"
o
"
>
t'
¡;;
'"
o
;:¡
'"
"
2
~
c
c:....
"'"
"''''
~~
"
C
"
'"
8
....
"-
.... 0
'" 0
co C
'"
..;
:i "'
"
c ç
H
N
,
....
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
ñ >,
'" '"
Z C
" ~
H
0
'"
.,
OJ :>
>
~ "
".
H
°
C
~
Mon
Mon
Mon
Mon
Mon
Mon
Tues
Weds
Weds
Thurs
Thurs
Thurs
Thurs
Thurs
Fri
Sat
Sat
Sun
Sun
Sun
CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT
FIRElRESCUE
WEEK OF FEBRUARY 21, - FEBRUARY 27, 2000
Feb 21 8:27 AM
Feb 21 12:33 PM
Feb 21 12:50 PM
Feb 21 5:13 PM
Feb 21 7:41 PM
Feb 21 10:30 PM
Feb 22 8:36 AM
Feb 23 5:44 PM
Feb 23 8:06 PM
Feb 24 8:38 AM
Feb 24 8:50 AM
Feb 24 2:25 PM
Feb 24 8: 19 PM
Feb 24 8:33 PM
Feb 25 8:16 AM
Feb 26 11:34 AM
Feb 26 8:47 PM
Feb27 00:12AM
Feb 27 9:58 AM
Feb 27 2:43 PM
Hazeltine Boulevard
Market Boulevard
West 78th Street
Pleasant View & Powers Blvd
Cardinal
Leslee Curve
Hazeltine Boulevard
Audubon Road
Mayfield Court
Park Drive
Lake Drive East
Kerber Blvd & Powers Blvd
West 78th Street
Valley Ridge Trail South
Century Boulevard
Chanhassen Road
Audubon Road
Cheyenne Trail
Chippewa Trail
Rosewood Drive
Fire alann - false alann, no fire
Medical- chest pains
Medical- child fell
Car accident with injuries
Man needed assistance
Medical- possible stroke
Fire alann - false alann, no fire
Fire alann - false alann, no fire
Medical- trouble breathing
Fire alann - false alann, no fire
Fire alann - false alann, no fire
Car accident with injuries
Medical- trouble breathing
Fire alann - false alann, no fire
Medical- weakness
Medical- cancelled
Fire alann - False alann, no fire
Possible house fire
Smell of smoke - unfounded
Medical - cancelled
,1. ¡~ ~ l.r¡.·.f.+~~.·.~.·..t. H p~ U.~.4; ~... .;å ;J!.'. '.~..~......':............. ~ ~.·.U mm
0.. '.......J }. 11 JiE.··.. ......~..:d.l~..=.J .. I... ...1. :.. ~ I ~....J¡ i. ....1. . ..'~. '.... '...~... ~ l~....·.I......i.·........... ............... .i ;~} .. i"~.·...~ li
'. .. ..i:¡ ..... .5S ¡¡ .:i ... .~.... ... .... "".'" ~ ~ ij..:::t :I
I.. :.... >. '!I:I Iii. ':;i~·.· ~. ·"lji'··· ->.. .... '·1··""'\' 1:F .ClJl!
...... ............;.. fi i. .~. I!i,i}..·.i.... ........ ..... '. .......~...............è....,........ ~.;I..~. ........ .. ~.. ...... ~. .... 't<.'. '..J... ..J......~... ,...'..:....... M.·.,.,.·.....'<.·.:..~.:.. "............:........;1'...'....'.......................'... ~.. ..[..... ..¡:;.. ....j.. ..... .1......e;.:I ~ ë
". . .....~ ! ¡ '1>11'\1 I '. ...~ ~<6 · ~"."r·~r ð ~
'if.,.:..·.':.··· .'.l.. '.i tJ~ ~. iJ.I~. t!..;~.l~.J!. l~... J...rj. '.·.I.l·.;~I{..!.·.tj;.I...;....'..:.;...... .. i.·.I...'.J...·.·....I.I~.....i...!.~ jJ.: ~
.- ". I., t h·:H:~î ,,' '11>. "", ~,~, i 1~1.f,,",. ..'J
.. . =¡;¡J!s g,'I80""I:8 .,liD h.=·..J1 ~ 1·· .~~ i5J.:: .. .';3:,!!P ,.;....'. :i~ "'J
.p ...§ ~.:;I ~ ,j. ....0 ~ =.,,<: _ ~:fi.F .ë:¡ 1.!11i! .~-],j =B.A." i..' 1 ..J....].' e. ·.....:8.11. . ~¥¡.t!,Jj;¡ Ire
-= 15 0 "i J ".!! .æ"·sJ>':Z:. J'g.~ £ .eo ··8 . ... ¡!j.I;I' '. ~'Ií' . ~·Ji.s'¡:¡J
. "'13 8 :¡3 .a.. '13 Ji ':i &J"1i! Iii g,,j, ,,':5 b íii ¡
oS jJ~~~tflnfhhiHJh d~IGhHilfd~·flhIH!j
. ,¡,!s.S]..J-..~fø.Ji~bO~'Ó.s$~:!! ''''1'''': .s··..Jil.,~...'!u jJit,f¡ Ò.!!-a!B'<
~ ~¡1l~:~j r.· . 'tJji~ 1'¡~j1jl ~'. ':8... j =:~ il~..¡j·.:llil., .1 i !oß~..,:fi·~ ¡
.I: ~ ~].§ .¡¡ ã! ë 11 . ~ :g l¡ 50 J i== ., 1a 11 ¡ ~ ~ _I ~8 u 111 11 . . ~ Ji J § a 1])
.... "~'ß.:¡ iI .~ ·~..,ßß~·~. i5.0 ~ iii'" -j 'š" ã Iii as .~ f í .!i ~ E
1: nJ I!!Hi~ ~ih!~fj~JUU¡n¡:tl~Jíjr¡¡ Ht~~t ¡I
. ~~.~ ~ ~~~~~;§~] ~J i~~; 1 ¡¡;a .;~J! s ~.§·as Ji~Þii!s~t1];;~ ~fi~f.i
., g OJ ~:ø 1 ;s as 1!5. .<Ii ~ ' .. ... .!i G ¡" ~ " . ..., 0 ., " ., ~
I ~1~if~iljit1i ·~~~t~·lj1!lif~~lj r~"ltsll~f~tl¡t~l
-I. ~ 1 f.~ ~. ~ i :l~ Jttu..~.n. 1...1....U.. j.j.~.~..l.!; ~j.lf.·.'....i.·. i ;1 PJ 1m! ~
If- :~as.sg~§. ~J¡~",~ .~ <>".JJ¡lm .J.o .~. ~80... at! Ji~~!si<
.~ :5 ~J~ l!·jJ l~l~lil!l., ~r ~ll~j~lfl~ .'1 as ~~ I ~J]i
I J!i§¡j]1j.s~J!11J.rJI ~J'I.løl~j:!t~:fif~f [~~j~ 11J i;
-=.. '........ ... '..~. ..'...!i...e....'...g. t.·....... lj.' .J........~... ....8......'ã.·.. g.i!.. r.:fi..,.¡....liii!....:...............o£i...·..,.......¡¡..8....fL~..>J~. "B.' .~.~... ¡¡~~
o. ... . e¡¡~1! ¡l;2( ~ /ßO!\lr- ~~"i' :8~ .
III '" ,j II ~~¡~ ]J t l( .15] Y' '¡.' Jl]i I ~!1Þ.
~J!. jiliiiU!ifMli~!jl~;lllll:i~!Um~¡
:::t i!. J <lumf u.!HltH1Jdi~.lm!l¡~~¡~~i
....~
CSM Corporation ... .v..\,· ::20
2575 University Ave. W., #150· SI. Paul, MN 55114-1024 . (651) 646-1717 . Fax (651)"646"2404~ ... ---...'
cr '. eo........ ~ \
t::c-k--&A
'1>-. ~, - £ï'
March 7, 2000
Mr. Scott Botcher
City Manager
City of Chanhassen
690 Coulter Dr.
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Re: Southwest Tech Center
Dell Road and Lake Drive East
Chanh~sen,~inn~oæ
Dear Mr. Botcher:
As developer and owner of the Southwest Tech Center, the 360,000 square foot office park
currently unaer construction in eastern Chanhassen, we wanted to take a moment to congratulate
the City of Chanhassen for its part in the success of the project and thank the City Staff involved
in the approval process for their help in granting the necessary approvals.
Only six months from its inception, the 360,000 square foot, 4 building project is already 99%
leased to major corporations, including Supervalu, Young America Corporation, ADC
Telecommunications, and Data Collection Systems.
Thank you again to the City of Ch~.nhassen for laying the groundwork by which such a successful
project is made possible. We look forward to working cooperatively with the City of Chanhassen
on additional projects in the near future.
Sincerely,
o
/?_ r?
,~
David Carland
Vice President
DC/vs
02/21/00
[REVISOR]
JSK/DE
1
RD3122
C(: ~tf\
\1>1> i) 6\ .
Proposed Permanent Rules Governing the Definition of Persons and Families of Low
and Moderate Income R~!;EP¡ED
Housing Finance Agency
2
3
5
[For text of subps 1 to 22, see M.R.]
M/:,i·: ¡;;, 2000
en Y Uf (.;HI'\I'IHASS£N
4
4900.0010 DEFINITIONS.
6 Subp. 23. Persons and families of low and moderate income. "Persons and families
7 of low and moderate income" means:
8 [For text of item A, see M.R.]
9 B. [Repealed, 10 SR 1557]
10 C. With respect to multiunit mortgage loans pursuant to parts 4900.0310 to .
11 4900.0360, development cost loans pursuant to parts 4900.0210 to 4900.0240, plarming
12 grants pursuant to parts 4900.0410 and 4900.0420, and American Indian housing loans
13 pursuant to parts 4900.0900 to 4900.1080, which loans or grants are intended for a
14 multiunit development2
15 illill those persons and families whose adjusted income at initial occupancy
16 does not exceed tl,e greateI e,{ $16,000 õI 550 ]50(ht of tl,e glÕS3 I(I,Lal fÕI tI,e dwdlh,g
17 mrit to be occupied, ple,.ided, I,o"e,er, that the gloss rentals for at least 75 perceI,t of
18 the dn cUlug tudls ill sud, dE~ ElôplhCht slu~ll uot (x",d 120 pClcê:!,l of LIt' fair n,ðIkct
19 rents for the geögIaphkal area in "hich such projects ale located, as detcm,ined and
20 adjtlSlcd £101-.. tin" to tin" b) the Uhilcd ::taLcs DepAItll,clLl of IIotlsihg Ahd Utbah
21 De,dopn,er,t, ]5ro,ided fmiliCI, that 50 percent of area median income as determined
22 by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, adjusted for
23 family, size for at least 20 percent of the units in the development, or (ii) those persons
24 and families whose adiusted income at initial occupancy does not exceed 60 percent of
25 area median income, adiusted for family size, for at least 40 percent of the units in the
26 development. In addition to these requirements, at least 75 percent of the units in such
4900.0010
1
02/21/00
[REVISOR]
JSK/DE
RD3122
1 multiunit developrnents shall be occupied by persons or families whose adiusted
2 income at initial occupancy does not exceed the greater of area or statewide median
3 income for a four-person household; and
4 (2) assuming occupancv of at least 1.5 persons per bedroom, (n the rents for at
5 least 20 percent of the units in the development shall be affordable to persons and
6 families whose adiusted income is 50 percent of area median income and who pay no
7 more than 30 percent of their income for housing, or (in the rents for at least 40 percent
8 of the units in the development shall be affordable to persons and families whose
9 adjusted income is 60 percent of area median income and who pay no more than 30
10 percent of their income for housing.
11 The members may allow higher g[533 rentals rents for units in ftftY ~ structure if the
12 members determine that sueft higher gross ¡[[(tals rents are necessary because of
13 prevailing levels of construction costs, unusually high or low family incomes, or similar
14 factors relating to income available for housing or housing costs.
15 [For text of items D to H, see M.R.]
2
Riley
Purgatory
Bluff Creek
Watershed District
Web Site: httpllwww.barr.com/riley/
Legal Advisor:
Krebsbach & Haik
701 4th Avenue South, Suite 500
Minneapolis MN 55415
612-333-7400 FAX: 612-333-6959
Engineering Advisor: Barr Engineering
4700 West 77th Street
Minneapolis, MN 55435
612-832-2600 FAX: 612-832-2601
~ r,-"f:f\.' '~r;
nf....K..,.¡o:,_, ;';:-'
March 2, 2000
MAR C. ¿aoo
CI1Y Ur L.n,,,,,... __
¡/õV......:,-
Mayor and Council
City of Chanhassen
690 Coulter Drive
P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Re: Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District
Dear Mayor and Council:
Pursuant to Mimlesota Statutes Section ¡ 030.341, enclosed for filing are the rules
adopted by the Board of Managers of the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed
District. .
Sincerely,
RILEY.PURGATORY.BLUFf CREEK
WATERSHED DISTRICT,·
".. - / I .-
,.1/ "._ ) I .
.. /.. " .! ,
// '--..// ',' ,-', /, . /.'
. ",.: ,,/./. fJv ,/, /)'! . f / .
BY:,1.·I¡ ,f..r¡ , .' /.}I..··,V f·"
r d',,· kn
~onra . IS ess
President
Enclosure (I)
Board of Managers:
!-:,..,., '''' ,.,..,' D''' "rcf'l'~
D~~.·.. r~~_+,,~
,....._ ~ ~_ _, ,'_L_ _ ~_
""',__.1
Sec. 1. The Rule,; of the Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District are amended by
adding a subdivision to read;
I. FEES. If a person must obtain a permit required by the managers then that person
shan pay a field inspection at the time of application. The field inspection fee for projects of less
than ten acres shall be $600, for projects of ten acres but less than forty acres shan be $1,500, and
for projects greater than or equal to forty acres the fee shall be S3,OOO. The inspection fee will be
used to cover actual costs related to a field inspection. Inspection costs includc investigation of the
area affected by the proposed activity, analysis of the proposed activity, services of a consultant,
and any required subscquent monitoring of thc proposed activity. Costs of monitoring an activity
authorized by permit may be charged and collected as necessary after issuance of the permit.
Projects that inve,lve review by the District, as the local government unit responsible for
enforcement of the Wetlands Conservation Act, shall be charged an additional field inspection fee
on a time and materials basis. Field Inspection fees are not charged to the federal government, the
state, or a political suhdivlsion.
I, Howard L. Pcterson, Secretary of the Riley-Purgatory-BIuff Creek Watershed District, do
hereby certify that ¡ have compared the above Rules, as amended, with the original thereof as the
same appears on file with the District and find the same to be a true and correct copy of the Rules,
as amended, and as adopted by the Board of Managers at their meeting on the 1 st day of March
2000.
IN TESTII\IONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said
Watershed District this I sl day of March 2000.
~/ 7 _/ ..-2
~"'LJ ;;< /' r.-'ifG~
Howard L. Peterson, Secretary
1 Sec.!. The Rule~ of the Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District are amended to
2 read:
3
H.2. RE<ìULATION.
An applicant for a permit shall file a bond with the Board of
4
Managers in an amount ~et by the Board of Managers and conditioned on performance by the
5
applicant of authoTlzed activities in conformance with the terms of the permit. Among other things,
6
the bond shall assure installation, maintenance and removal of sedimentation and erosion controls,
7
including siltation barriers and vegetative cover; construction, maintenance and restoration of
8
temporary detention basins: construction, maintenance, and restoration of infiltration basins; and
9
monitoring, if reqUired, of any permitted activity.
10
I, Howard L. Peterson, Secretary of the Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District, do
II
hereby certify that I have compared the above Rules, as amended, with the original thereof as the
12
same appcars on file with the District and find the same to be a true and correct copy of the Rules,
13
as amended, and as adopted by the Board of Managers at their meeting on the I st day of March
14
2000.
15
IN TESTI!\IONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said
16
Watershed District this I st day of March 2000.
]7
~~2
. .µ<.J. '- ~~-
Howard L. Peterson, Secretary
18
19
~