Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
HRA 1985 10 17
AGENDA JOINT HRA AND CITY COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 17, 1985 7:30 P.M. 1. Call To Order 2. Approval of Minutes 3. Review Preliminary Planning Agreement - CHADDA 4. Consideration of Special Assessment Reduction Program for Sunnybrook Development 5. 1986 Budget and Cash Flow Analysis Review 6. Verbal Report: a. Halverson Lease Agreement b. Chanhassen Bowl j C. Satellite Medical Station 7. Old Business 8. New Business 9. Approval of Bills 10. Adjournment L L_. HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL JOINT MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER 19, 1985 CALL TO ORDER Chairman Whitehill called the meeting to order at 7:45 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT Commissioners Whitehill, Horn, Swenson, Robbins, Bohn and Mayor Hamilton. MEMBERS ABSENT Councilmembers Geving and Watson ALSO PRESENT Fred Hoisington, Don Ashworth, Barbara Dacy, Herb Bloomberg and Brad Johnson of Housing Alliance Inc. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Horn moved, seconded by Swenson to approve the minutes of August 15, 1985. All voted in favor and the motion carried. VISITORS PRESENTATION Brad Johnson from Housing Alliance Inc. was introduced by Herb Bloomberg on their proposal to the BRA. Mr. Bloomberg and Mr. Johnson have formed a development group called Chadds (Chanhassen Downtown Development Association) to perform market research and to prepare a market tested plan for a development project in the downtown area. Johnson presented to the HRA a six month time line,called the "Downtown Team Concept ", in which a specific market tested project would be put together. In so doing, Housing Alliance Inc. would have to conduct a market study to accurately represent to potential developers conditions existing in the Chanhassen market area. Development areas that Chadds will pursue include housing, convenience retail, hotel and spe- cialty uses. E Ashworth stated that staff supports the proposal but alerted the BRA and Council that if a project is put together a strain may result on the City's ability to provide public improvements such as adequate utilities and drainage capabilities. Updating of these improvements, he noted, is now under way through various feasibility studies. Motion by Horn, seconded by Bohn to direct staff to prepare an agreement with Chadda; authorizing the expenditure of $15,000 for a market study and allowing Housing Alliance to hire a market P researcher; however billing would be through the Housing Alliance f� books. All voted in favor and the motion carried. F- HRA and City Council Joint Meeting September 19, 1985 Page 2 STATUS OF CHANHASSSEN STATE BANK CONSTRUCTION Ashworth reported to the HRA that a site plan approval was granted to the bank for expansion on July 15, 1985. However, construction bids on the expansion were very high. The bank contacted City staff regarding alternative sites. The bank has now purchased the Huber property in the immediate northwest corner of Laredo and West 78th Street, just south of the Post Office. Ashworth noted that Fred Hoisington has been working with the bank regarding the alternate site and its impact on the downtown concept plan. Ashworth stated that the bank will be seeking site plan approval in the near future. 1986 BUDGET Whitehill moved, seconded by Swenson to table consideration of the 1986 Budget to the October 17, 1985 meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried. ORGANIZATION ITEMS Swenson moved, seconded by Whitehill, to re -elect the current Chairman, Vice - Chairman and Secretary ( Whitehill, Horn and Bohn) to another term. All voted in favor and the motion carried. APPROVAL OF BILLS Horn moved, seconded by Swenson to approve the bills as pre- sented. All voted in favor and the motion carried. ADJOURNMENT Swenson moved, seconded by Bohn to adjourn the meeting at 9:20 p.m. All voted in favor and the motion carried. F , k CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Housing and Redevelopment Authority FROM: Don Ashworth, City Manager DATE: October 9, 1985 SUBJ: Preliminary Planning Agreement, Housing and Redevelopment Authority and Chanhassen Downtown Development Associates Attached is a copy of the preliminary planning agreement as requested by the Commission last month. Chanhassen Downtown Development Associates support the agreement. I am forwarding a copy of this document to the City Attorney's office. Any changes suggested by Roger Knutson will be noted Thursday evening. City Hall has discussed various development projects with prop- erty owners in the downtown area during the past year, i.e. potential expansion by Gary Kirt, Chanhassen State Bank construc- tion, etc. All of the projects potentially arising during the next six month period should be able to proceed under the exclu- sion of "fee owner" developments from the agreement. Two develop- ment projects,in very initial stages, would not fall under the "fee owner" exclusion. I anticipate being able to report Thursday evening whether either of these two projects should be treated as an exception to the agreement. In all other respects, the attached agreement is recommended for approval. A _J l �� A \ Y� PRELIMINARY PLANNING AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made as of this day of , 1985, by and between CHANHASSEN DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, a Minnesota general partnership ( "Redeveloper ") and the HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a public body corporate and politic (hereinafter, "Authority ") established under Minnesota Statutes Sections 462.411- 462.711 (hereinafter, "Act "), WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, in furtherance of the objectives of the Act, the Authority has undertaken a program for the clearance, reconstruction or rehabilitation of blighted, deteriorated, deteriorating, vacant, unused, underused or inappropriately used areas of the City of Chanhassen ( "City ") and in this connection is engaged in preparing a modification to its Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, in order to achieve the objectives of its Redevelopment Plan, as amended, the Authority has determined that it is in the best interests of the City, and the health, safety, morals and welfare of its residents, and in accord with the public purposes and provisions of the applicable state and local laws and requirements of its Redevelopment Plan to undertake such amendment and to designate the Redeveloper as the planning agent for the Project Area hereinafter defined, upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual obligations of the parties hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree as follows: 1. Representations of the Authority. The Authority represents that it is a validly organized and existing housing and redevelopment authority under the laws of the State of Minnesota and has full power to carry out its obligations hereunder, and that this agreement, and the activities taken by the Authority thereunder, are undertaken for the purpose of removing, preventing or reducing blight, blighting factors, or the causes of blight and for the purpose of eliminating or preventing the development or spread of deteriorated or deteriorating areas. 2, Representations of Redeveloper. The Redeveloper represents and warrants that it is a Minnesota partnership duly f organized and in good standing under the laws of the State of Minnesota and has full power to enter into this agreement and to perform all of the terms and conditions thereunder to be performed by the developer thereunder. 3. Planning Services of Redeveloper. The Redeveloper shall prepare and furnish to the Authority a planning document ( "Plan ") which shall set forth with particularity proposed commercial, retail, residential and public land uses for the area ( "Plan Area ") designated on Exhibit A attached hereto, and according to the schedule attached as Exhibit B. Such Plan shall be in such detail and shall include such features as to enable the same to be coordinated with and, upon the cstnining of the requisite municipal approval, incorporated into the existing Redevelopment Plan. Such Plan shall also include a market analysis, to be conducted by the Redeveloper or its agent or subcontractor, analyzing the market feasisbility of the respective commercial and residential uses proposed in the Plan. The Redeveloper and the Authority shall cooperate with one another as necessary in the development of the Plan. The Redeveloper shall report to the Authority not less often than monthly on the status of its preparation of the Plan, and shall submit the entire completed Plan to the Authority no later than 180 calendar days after the date of execution of this Agreement. The Plan, upon submission, shall become the property of the Authority. The Authority shall only reimburse the Redeveloper up to the sum of $15,000.00 for the market research needed for preparaton of the Plan, such amount to be paid as follows: Each month the Redeveloper shall provide the Authority with actual copies of the invoices for work completed by marketing consultants. The Authority shall pay for marketing services rendered and so invoiced within 30 days of the receipt of invoice. L 4. ADproval of Redevelopments During Plan Period. During the period of 180 days above described ( "Plan Period "), or unless this 1.greement is terminated by action of the parties, as herein below described, whichever event sooner occurs, the Authority shall not approve any development proposal involving a commercial redevelopment in excess of 5,000 net rentable square feet within the Plan Area unless the Authority is advised by its legal counsel that the Authority would be subject to legal liability to the proponent of such redevelopment should it fail or refuse to consider such redevelopment. The parties understand that the purpose of this Agreement during the Plan Period is to enable the Redeveloper to coordinate its planning process with respect to the entire Plan Area. Any Fee Owner shall be exempt from the terms of this section. LWf(b�t 5. Adoption of Amendment to Redevelopment Plan. The parties anticipate that the Authority may adopt and approve the Plan as a formal amendment to its existing Redevelopment Plan, provided, however, that nothing herein contained shall be deemed to bind or limit the discretion of the Authority as provided by law. In the event the Authority adopts such amendment, it shall simultaneously designate the Redeveloper as the master redeveloper for the Plan Area. 6. Termination of Agreement. Ei_Lher party may terminate this agreement upon thirty (3u) days prior written notice to the other, with or without default, and, in the event of any such termination, the Redeveloper shall be entitled to payment of amounts set forth in Paragraph 3 above, but only to that extent which represents actual work completed as of the date of the written termination notice. The parties anticipate that during the Plan Period, the Authority and the Redeveloper shall in good faith negotiate and secure all necessary approvals for the master redevelopment agreement such that upon the expiration of the Plan Period, and the completion of the services to be performed by the Redeveloper hereunder, this Agreement shall be superseded and replaced by such master redevelopment agreement. Both parties agree to negotiate in good faith such master redevelopment agreement. In the event such master redevelopment agreement is not negotiated within such time period, upon the expiration of the Plan Period, neither party shall have any further liability hereunder (save and except for the obligation of the Authority with respect to payment for market research as described in Paragraph 3 above). 7. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the respective parties hereto and their successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written. CHANHASSEN DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, a Minnesota general partnership By: a general partner HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ts: And By: Its: e (D N i f ' { _ ... ;� 1 o � t 1 , In 11 I : { "c ,G • � I r� YtJ ..,. l �;i �_ -- �1;: BrauerSNssociatesLtd.inc CHANHASSEN DOWNTOWN�,.....� ,w. wo.a,w. o,... ia. w..r..+........ +.,.. REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT i ,„ �.� YREI1ONAfi 0fORLig1 atwefr mno AIO wa usE nal WA RW AO COQOMATMO OF180�R roR 1i 1013 3.0 10110 5.0 10/19 10.0 1111UO3 0.0 It /14 I5.0 1110 10.0 10 10.0 NU ASpOwFS 06L[OEVflaRBlf PKSDff IEVI CO�i' QfV I1NLR auA�T¢ T6f CO1CIDiLlAM aSE OOVELOVE0. WA L&=!I 8 �r ca91 =aL]O AMAlYS11 M Nam OMISN00./M awl cc, � r caslcn aceun roMA COa77NA1M RvRa>Ba ANKY09 DOWNTOWN CHANHASSEN REDEVELOPMENT 1 TEAM CONCEPT BLOOMBERG COMPANIES R HOUSING ALLIANCE COORDINATING DEVELOPERS aces waEC9 Sa L OAMfO 1110 I 10.0 TFA11 Ine +a.o ON6CPfwwaAl L 0M6+91p RAN 0/00 0.0 F1059R 0fl mw ca mr Jl� r t ip 4 W CHANHASSEN HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 Im (612) 937 -1900 MEMORANDUM TO: Housing and Redevelopment Authority FROM: Barbara Dacy, City Planner DATE: October 11, 1985 SUBJ: Consideration of Special Assessment. Reduction Program for Sunnybrook Development Attached is a letter from Barney Schlender of Sunnybrook Development Group is requesting that the special assessment reduction program be applied to his proposal, now being con - sidered by the Planning Commission, in the Chanhassen Lakes Business Park Third Addition (see attached location map). Sunnybrook Development Group is requesting a 108 reduction be applied to the special assessments for the proposed development. As you know, the BRA discussed amending the special assessment reduction agreement in the developed portion of the Business Park by creating a threshold amount of $30,000 to trigger an increased percentage to be applied to special assessments. Staff is not requesting that the HRA take action on this matter, but discuss its implications on past and future policies. Sunnybrook's development proposal has been considered by the Planning Commission at two meetings and has been tabled so that additional site plan information can be received and additional studies be made regarding realigning the proposed Lake Drive East right-of-way BD:v 8unnybrooK a country inn and restaurant of distinction September 16, 1985 I.X. Don Ashworth Chanhassen Housing & Rdevelopment Authority 690 Coulter Drive Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Dear Lr. Ashworth: Sunnybrook Development Group does hereby request through the Chanhassen Housing and Redevelopment Authority, that a proposal to the Chanhassen City Council be drawn requesting that Chanhassen Lakes Business Park, 'third Addition, be included as a 'Special Assessment Reduction District. Subsequent to this approval, Sunnybrook Development Group requests a 10% reduction be applied to assessed costs of future improvements projected within and along the Lake Drive East perimeter. Bill t =:onk is presently involved in the updating of a feasibilty study pertaining to this area -- -Council, Planning and Staff have reviewed the proposed realignment of Lake Drive East as well as the proposed development; so I trust this request will receive your timely attention. C9j� Res ectfully, A Barney gV. Schlender SEP 7 'i 198.5 ('ITY Of CHANHASSE ?I P.O. Box 472 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 (612) 869 -1977 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Barbara Dacy, City Planner DATE: October 5, 1985 SUBJ: Sunnybrook Development PROCESS This is to clarify the process for approval of the Sunnybrook Development proposal. The subdivision, rezoning and site plan review process is the same process for approval on the site adja- cent to Lake Ann Park north of Hwy. 5. The Zoning Ordinance provides for the creation of a Planned Industrial District for large industrial developments over ten acres in size. As you know, the business park is now zoned P -4 except for the Instant Web property and the property that will be occupied by Victory Envelope which is zoned P -3. The Chanhassen Lakes Business Park received PUD approval in 1975. Sunnybrook's proposed subdivision is in effect replatting previously platted lots in this portion of the business park. The Sunnybrook proposal is creating two large lots, one of which is to contain their pro- posed development. It was recommended, as they did in their pre- vious application, to simply process a straight preliminary plat subdivision application and also file a rezoning application to accomplish or to implement the rezoning. By receiving approval of the zoning from P -4 to P -3, the proposed use would then be a permitted use and therefore would trigger the normal site plan review process for any commercial or industrial permitted use. Therefore, the three procedures that the applicant has to go through are predicated upon the other being approved. The sub- division must be approved before the rezoning can take place. If the subdivision is approved and the rezoning is approved, then the site plan review can take place. If the subdivision and the rezoning is not approved, then the application is denied, and site plan review is not necessary. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - September 11, 1985 L The Planning Commission at their last meeting moved to approve the subdivision request subject to staff's recommendation as well Sunnybrook Development October 5, 1985 Page 2 as the rezoning request from P -4 to P -3. The site plan review was tabled so that the Lake Susan Homeowner's Association could be contacted and informed about the project. Staff has done so and a homeowner's association meeting was conducted with staff and the applicant on October 2, 1985. Representatives of the homeowner's association will be at Wednesday's meeting. Feasibility Study As you recall from the last meeting, staff's recommendations of approval on the subdivision, rezoning and the site plan were based upon satisfactory completion of the feasibility study to investigate the appropriateness of realigning Lake Drive East to the north. Since the Planning Commission meeting, staff has received the soil report from the engineers (see Attachment #1). The report indicates that soils in the proposed realignment area consist of several feet of fill over organic, peat and swampy soils. The City Engineer is recommending that the realignment to the north not take place due to poor soil conditions and their related structural problems. Therefore, it is staff's recommendation that the realignment to the north not take place and that the applicant revise the preli- minary plat and site plan to reflect the existing alignment and make any necessary changes to the proposal. ATTACHMENTS 1. Memo from City Engineer with soils report from OSM dated October 2, 1985. 2. Letter from Evan Green, MnDOT, dated September 30, 1985. 3. Staff report dated September 11, 1985. M L✓ CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 MEMORANDUM T0: Planning Commission FROM: Bill Monk, City Engineer DATE: October 2, 1985 SUBJ: Sunnybrook Site Plan The Sunnybrook site plan included a proposed realignment of Lake Drive East at the eastern limits of the Business Park Third Addition. Based on the realignment proposal, the City initiated preparation of a revision to the previously completed feasibility study for the roadway layout as presently platted (see attached map). The first step in the revision process was to secure soil data due to the presence of wetland areas on both sides of the proposed street alignment. The soil report is attached for your review. The results are so poor that further engineering work has been put on hold. The report shows 16 to 17 feet of sandy clay fill material on organic swamp deposits over 28 feet deep. Although only two borings were taken, the soils engineers believe this material will be encountered for at least a 500 foot long section of the proposed street. Based on the findings of the soils report and the noted structural problems to be anticipated with utility and street construction through such materials, I cannot recommend approval of the proposed realignment for a thru street in an industrial area. The potential for significant long -range maintenance problems caused by structural failure is too great given existing conditions. Lastly, I believe that any interest in pursuing the realign- ment would cease upon review of the cost factors involved with installation of utility piles and sub -base surcharging. Although cost estimates have not been prepared for these special work items, the impact on the original $1,046,400 projection would be significant. z41r1 \� MW L',- '�•�� GAIJIINb -- PROPOSE ••• °• ° °• EXISTING SAN SAM', WATk WATE Ao.n BY Dale Gomm Ha. ^OHH SCALE: I" �(IJI LFN M %N1 :110N Dra.�np idle //M//�y LAKE DRIVE EAST CHANHASSEN LAKES BUSINESS PARK llwA A / DIYwoMo! KIDOE C.MSO,,FJS INC CHANHASSEN , MINNESOTA <y441 0R Iz- C7 L' I F. & PACIFIC �i- . W. 79 TH. ST. \ ST. PAUL HIGHWAY Down By Date Comm No. osm b. INC. /� A / ow is�ur. or x�uut Cossm ueys iu� PROPOSED DETENTION POND IN LOW AREA LAKE SUSAN LAKE DRIVE EAST CHANHASSEN LAKES BUSINESS PARK CHANHASSEN MINNESOTA D.owrop Tmn BENIF PROPc SEWE •••.•..•..••.•• PROPi ......... CONS' (36' F SCALE: I "= 4C LAKE DR. Drotrn Date W. -19 - " I PROPOSED WATERMAIN PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LAKE DRIVE EAST CHANHASSEN LAKES BUSINESS PARK CHANHASSEN , MINNESOTA DrCainO Title ORR SCHFLF'� MA}'FRON S ASSOCIATFS. INC. carwr5urwraf TO). 11.•.uavu .n 1W`1 ae {W NV1Oe Y..H.r4 a] WYa1501. S5.". ("') ]a ...t A A / owwoY v and cow *u *a,�.2' ® NORTH I SCALE: 1 "= 400' Comm No Sheet No SECTION TI I i J LAKE EX bl BENIFITED AREA _ . _ , _ _ PROPOSED STORM SEWER 11 LAKE DRIVE EAST CHANHASSEN LAKES BUSINESS PARK CHANHASSEN , MINNESOTA PROPOSED STREET CONSTRUCTION (36' F -F) O NORTH SCALE: I"= 400' Comm No Sheet No SECTION a Drown By Crowing Title //�y/�y/�\ ' + ORR SCHFLE N, N1:1} F.RO\ ti ASPOCI ATES, INC. cefwur uf�en vc:.a: a... •:. ..: Deta y ow". •:wn u�.:5 olsc 1. '1.0 Ie::I lL eano OwiLO• Y .0W [peSV�flw�f .:�f PROPOSED STREET CONSTRUCTION (36' F -F) O NORTH SCALE: I"= 400' Comm No Sheet No SECTION a e ° I � Consulting Engineers Land Surveyors September 25, 1985 ORR•SCHELEN • MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mr. Bill Monk, P.E. City Engineer City of Chanhassen 690 Coulter Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Alternate Location Lake Drive East OSM Comm. No. 3515.10 Dear Mr. Monk: You asked us to do a feasibility study for an alternate location of Lake Drive East within the Phase II segment. The alternate as proposed by the Owner shows the street relocated to cross the wet swampy area where the existing church driveway is located. Because of the nature of the soil, we had two borings taken on either side of the existing driveway. These borings, as described in the enclosed soils report, show organic material to at least 45 feet. Based on the topo map furnished, we would estimate the length of street proposed across this swamp to be at least 500 feet. We would recommend that a major street such as Lake Drive East, not be con- structed at this location, based on the available soils information. We feel it would be a waste of money to proceed any further with the feasibility study on this alternate. Please let us know if you would like to have us pursue this any further. Yours very truly, ORR- SCHELEN- MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC,., �,„� p. Robert D. Frigaard, P.E. Associate RDF:nlb Enclosure 2021 East Hennepin Avenue • Suite 238 • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413 • 612 1 331- 8660 r i 1 iaua a :.s ilialad a I -A i 8 d, t'.'a „ f :'<r \ _ ,� 1: j 1925 Oakcrest Avenue Roseville, Minnesota 55113 • (612) 636 -7744 - f Apple Valley, Minnesota • (612) 431 -5266 - II *4— REPORT OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION Kr- - PROJECT: REPORTED TO: ROADWAY & UTILITIES - _._. LAKE DRIVE EAST � CITY OF CHANHASSEN C/0 ORR- SCHEIEN- MAYERON ALTERNATE PART II 2021 EAST HENNEPIN AVENUE, 0238 CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55413 ATTENTION: MR. R. FRIGAARD, P.E. GEC JOB N0: 4186 DATE: SEPTEMBER 23, 1985 INTRODUCTION On September 18, 1985, we drilled two test borings at the referenced project. Based on the results of the borings, we have provided recommen- dations for design and construction of the utilities and roadway with respect to the subsurface conditions. TEST BORING METHODS The boring locations are shown on the attached sketch. The borings were made along the Lutheran Church driveway;at locations as directed by Orr - Schelen- Mayeron. The borings were made using the auger method. Refer to the attached sheets (Drilling, Sampling and Testing; Test Boring and Logging Methods) for additional information regarding test boring and logging methods. The soils were identified in accordance with the ASTM Visual- Manual Method as described on the attached sheet (Unified Soil Classification System). The elevations of the ground surface at the borings was determined in refer- ence to the floor slab north of the main entrance to the Lutheran Church. 71 SOIL AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING • TEST BORINGS • MONITORING WELLS • SOIL TESTING VIBRATION SEISMOGRAPH • PERCOLATION TESTING • ENGINEERING GEOLOGY • CONSTRUCTION TESTING 1V GEC #4186 - Page 2 RESULTS OF BORING General Refer to the attached logs for a description of the subsurface conditions encountered in the borings. The logs show: the depths to the boundaries between the soil layers; the description, classification, and geologic identification of the soils; the surface elevations at the borings; water level measurements; and other information. Refer to the attached sheets (Drilling, Sampling, and Testing; Test Boring and Logging Methods; Geologic Terminology; Groundwater) for a description of terminology used on the logs. Subsurface conditions can vary from that encountered in the borings at other locations, depths, and times. Depending on the degree of variabi- lity, this could: 1) necessitate altering our conclusions and recommen- dations for design and construction procedures, and 2) affect the cost of design and construction. The degree of variability could be evaluated by additional exploration. Soils The general soil profile encountered in the borings is fill over swamp deposits. The borings were drilled to depths of 45 feet. Swamp deposits were encountered at those depths. Refer to the attached sheet for a description of geologic terminology. Groundwater Groundwater was encountered in the borings at about the same elevation as the adjacent pond. That water level was determined at elevation 60.2. Refer to the attached sheet for general information regarding groundwater conditions and observations. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION GEC #4186 - Page 3 DESIGN INFORMATION We understand that the proposed roadway and utilities: 1) will be located in the area of the test borings; 2) will have buried water and sewer pipe; 3) will have embankment fill placed to attain design roadway dimensions; 4) will carry mixed automobile and truck traffic; 5) will have normal toler- ance to settlement; and 6) will be of conventional design and construction. Deviations from the above design information could necessitate altering our conclusions and recommendations. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the results of the borings and on the design information, it is our opinion that subsurface conditions are generally unsuitable for normal buried utility and embankment type construction. The swamp deposit soils are subject to decomposition, consolidation, and settlement. The weight of fill placed for the embankment will compress the organic soils. This compression will result in settlement at the surface, which, in turn, could lead to adverse movement and cracking in the utilities and the roadway. By employing special design and construction procedures, the project can be constructed satisfactorily. Referring to the attached list of special design and construction procedures, we estimate that the most applicable options at the project are: Utilities: - Deep Foundations ( #5). Install piles through the surficial soils and into the basal bearing stratum soils and construct the utilities on the piles/caissons. Embankment: - Preconsolidation ( #6). Preload or surcharge the embankment area, monitor the settlement and construct the roadway after the settlement rate is tolerable. Settlements of up to 1/4 to 1/3 the thickness of the organic deposit have been observed on other case histories of simi- lar projects. - Relocate ( #22). Move the roadway to a location where subsurface con- ditions will support an embankment without excessive settlement. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION GEC #4186 - Page 4 Refer to the attached sheets for additional information regarding some of the special design and construction procedures. The sheets are: Deep Foundations Preconsolidation We recommend additional deep soil borings be drilled into basal or bearing stratum soils for this project. Additional subsurface exploration is also recommended to define the lateral extent of the swamp deposits. CLOSURE To protect the addressee, the public, and ourselves, this report (and all supporting information) is provided for the addressee's own use. No repre- sentations are made to parties other than the addressee. Report Prepared By: CI /'X?uP�(c'1ZEl��cP� Lawrence F. Feldsien, P.E. MN Reg. No. 9103 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION GEOTECHNICAL GEC JOB NO: 4186 PROJECT: LAKE DRIVE EAST; ALTERNATE ENGINEERING CORPORATION LOG OF BORING NO. I (P . I Of 2) PART II; CHANHASSEN. MINNESOTA DEPTH, SURFACE ELEVATION: 61.3 N AMPL FIELD d LABORATORY TESTS FEET IDENTIFICATION GEOLOGY BPF WB TYPE AEC. MC I DEN PL.L. .L. Silty sand, fine grained, with - a trace of gravel, with roots, N FA —brown sli htly plastic -SM 2- 3- 4- 5- 6- 7- Sandy clay, with a trace of gravel, brown, (CL) 6 FILL Y 7 F 9- lo- ll - 12- 13- 14 - 15- Y FA 16- — 17- Organic silt /peat, black, (OL /PT SWAMP 1B- DEPOSITS 19- 20 - 21 - DEPTH DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS NOTE: REFER TO 0- 441/2: FA DATE TIME SAMPLED CASING CAVE-IN DRILLING WATER DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH FLUID LEVEL LEVEL THE ATTACHED - 2 SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF COMPLETED 4/18/85 1:33 ' Cc RT CA: RAHIg: 55 TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOG E_enver- umerwi mUr-2R1 :FO11UP. f_f1OOnO®TInU 4186 1 (p. 2 Of 2) GEC JOB NO: LOG OF BORING NO: LAKE DRIVE EAST; ALTERNATE PART II; CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA PROJECT: _ DEPTH , SAMPLE FIELD 6 LABORATORY TESTS MC DEN L L. FL- F EET IDENTIFICATION GEOLOGY N WO TYPE REC. 22- 23- 24- 25- 26- 27- 28- 29— Organic silt /peat, black, (OL /PT) gW 30— DEPOSITS FA 31- 32 - 33- 34- 35- 38- 37- 38- 39- 40- 41- 42- 43- 44 - i 45— NO OF BORING 48- 47- . GEOTECPINICAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION 4186 GEC JOB NO: LOG OF BORING NO. 2 ( P . 1 Of 2 ) PROJECT: LAKE DRIVE EAST; ALTERNATE PART II; CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA DEPTH, I SURFACE ELEVATION: 63'5 N AMPL FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS FEET IDENTIFICATION GEOLOGY BPF NB TYPE REC. MC DEN Pl. 1- Organic silt, with sand, black, (OL) Y FA 2- 3- 4- 5- 6- 7- 6- FILL M FA 10- 11 - 12- Sandy clay, with a trace of 13- gravel, brown, (CL) 14- 15- Y FA 16- 17- Is- 19- SWAMP DEPOSITS 20- 21- DEPTH DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS NOTE: REFER TO 0- 441 : FA DATE TIME SAMPLED CASING CAVE -IN DRILLING WATER DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH FLUID LEVEL LEVEL THE ATTACHED 9/18 4:37 44-J2 2.7 dry SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF BORING 4/18/85 3:11 COMPLETED: TERMINOLOGY CC: R7 CA: RA Rig: 55 5 ON THIS LOG — GEOTECFrINICAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION GEC JOB NO: 4186 LOG OF BORING NO: 2 (p. 2 of 2 ) LAKE DRIVE EAST; ALTERNATE PART II; CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA PROJECT: DEPTH. SAMPLE FIELD G LABORATORY TESTS MC DEN p'�' FEET IDENTIFICATION GEOLOGY N WB TYPE REC. Y FA 22- 23- 24- 26- 26- 27- Organic silt /peat, black, SWAMP 28— (OL /PT) DEPOSITS Y FA 29- 30 - 31- 32 - 33- 34- 35- 36- 37- 38- 39- 40- 41- 42 - 43- 44 - - -END OF BORING 45— 48- 47- Page 1 of 2 TEST BORING AND LOGGING METHODS STANDARD PENETRATION - SPLIT SPOON TEST A 1 -3/8" ID, 2" OD steel sampling tube is driven into the soil with a 140 -pound hammer falling 30 ". The number of hammer blows required to drive the sampler 1', after an initial set of 112', is the standard penetration resistance ( "N" value). The bore hole is advanced between sampling intervals with flight auger, hollow stem auger, casing, or by rotary drilling with drilling fluid. AUGER BORINGS Auger borings are drilled by hand or with a power- driven auger. The hand auger method consists of drilling the auger into the soil in increments of approximately 4 ", then retracting the auger and observing the material re- covered. This allows almost continuous observation of the soil profile. Two procedures are available in drilling power auger borings: "spinning" and "pulling." - In the spinning procedure, the auger is drilled into the ground in incre- ments of 5', or less. The auger is then spun rapidly. Soil "rides up" the flights of the auger to the ground surface, where samples are taken. In general, this method results in reasonably accurate identification of the soil profile above the groundwater table, but it can be very misleading - particularly in sandy and gravelly soils - below the water table. - In the pulling procedure, the auger is drilled into the ground and then withdrawn to above the ground surface. The general soil profile can be observed, and samples of materials adhering to the auger are taken. In general, this method is considered to be a little more accurate than the spinning method in soil above the groundwater table, and considerably more accurate than the spinning method in soil below the groundwater table. THIN - WALLED TUBE SAMPLES Relatively undisturbed samples are taken with thin - walled tubes. The tube is pushed into the soil and retracted with the soil sample inside the tube. STATIC CONE TESTS The static cone test consists of measuring the force required to push a steel cone penetrometer into soil. The cone is pushed at a rate of approximately 112" per second. The static cone bearing pressure, qc, is the total load divided by the projected end area of the cone. Cone diameters available are 1 -3/4 ", 2 -1/4 ", and 3 ". The apex angle is 60 °. A hand cone penetrometer is often used in conjunction with hand auger borings. It has a 300 apex angle and a projected end area of 0.5 square inches. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION CORING Coring is done with a diamond or carbide bit on a double -tubed barrel. LOGGING Both factual data and interpretive information is included on boring logs. In general, the information on the righthand side and the bottom of a log is considered to be essentially factual data. In the "Identification" and "Geology" columns, the intent is to portray the soil profile, or stratigraphy, based on interpretation of available data. Since the information shown is interpretive, it is subject to error. The accuracy of the information shown is controlled by the type and amount of data available. In general, there are three basic categories of information shown: 1) the soil identification, or "classification" of materials; 2) geologic identification of the soils; and 3) the depths of the contacts between soil layers. Determination of the depth to contacts between soil layers is arrived at by taking into consideration the action of the drill tools and the appearance of materials recovered. On a given boring log, contacts shown with solid and dashed lines are used to indicate higher and lower accuracy, respectively. In general, the entire soil profile is not observed or sampled. Consequently, indicated depths of contacts may be incorrect, and some materials or layers may be undetected in a boring and may not be indicated on a boring log. Boulders and other large objects generally are not recovered from test borings. This is due to limitations on the size of particles that can be recovered. Though there may be no specific reference to such materials on boring logs or in a report, they may be present in the ground. This is particularly applicable to deposits such as coarse alluvium, uncontrolled fill, glacial till, outwash, tumblerock, and weathered bedrock. Typewritten logs are prepared based on field logs. A field log may contain in- terpretive information - such as notes regarding unusual drilling conditions - which is not indicated on the typewritten log. 0 ioc GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION L C TERMINOLOGY ON BORING LOGS: DRILLING, SAMPLING, AND TESTING NOTATION (Refer to attached sheets for additional information.) A,B,N,H: Size casing or core. AC: At completion of boring. CA: Crew Assistant. CAS: Casing. CC: Crew Chief. CONS: One dimensional consolidation test. COT: Clean -out tube. DEN: Dry density, pounds /cubic foot. DM: Drilling mud fluid. FA: Flight auger, power driven. P -pull; S -spin. HA: Hand auger. HSA: Hollow stem auger. HYD: Hydrometer analysis. LL: Liquid limit. MC: Moisture Content, percent of dry weight. N: Standard penetration test, penetration resistance, or N value, in blows /foot (unless otherwise noted). PAP: Paper plug. PL: Plastic limit. qp: Pocket penetrometer strength, tons /square foot. qc: Static cone bearing pressure, tons /square foot. qu: Unconfined compressive strength, tons /square foot. RD: Rotary drilling, using drilling fluid and a cone -type roller bit. REC: In split spoon and thin wall tube sampling, the length of sample recovered, in inches. In rock coring, the length of core recovered as a percentage of the total core run. REV: Revert drilling fluid. SA: Sieve analysis. SS: Standard split spoon sampler. Steel. 1 -3/8" inside diam., 2" outside diam. TW: Thin - walled tube sampler. VANE: Vane shear strength, tons /square foot. L - Laboratory; F - Field. WASH: Sample of coarser - grained material from rotary drilling fluid. Obtained by screening the returning fluid or with a split spoon sampler at the bottom of the bore hole. WAT: Water. WB: Describes whether the sample appears to be waterbearing. WH: Sampler advanced by static weight of drill rod and 140 lb, hammer. WR: Sampler advanced by static weight of AW size drill rod. -200: Amount of material finer than #200 sieve, per cent. V : Water level symbol. Note: The size of equipment is indicated by a number preceding the descriptive term. For example, 2 -1/2 CAS represents 2 -1/2" diameter casing. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION MAJOR DIVISIONS GRAPH LETTER TYP ICAL DESCR /PT/ONS SYMBOL SYMBOL d:. wCy L -4 RAp CD GkFVCL S, 4N1VCL- GRAVEL ,. } ;;; :: GW SANU .V I Fr URES,L IFTLEON ;Np CLEAN GRAVELS : ;;:fy:: No FIN Es GRAVELLY (LITTLE OR No SOILS FINES .:�R•�� ^ POORLY- GRADED GRAVELS.4RAVEL- �:_::�:::� GP SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR G No FINES INE GRAGRAINED ,:f'::'!�'� SOILS GM SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL -SAND- MORE THAN 50% GRAVELS WITH FINES SILT 41XTUR ES OF COARSE FRAC- TION RETAIN (APPRECIABLE AMOUNT ON N0.4 SIEVE OF FINES GC CLAYEY GRAVR -SAND- CLAY MIXTURES MIXTURES S.W wELL -GRAD CD SANDS, GRAVELLY SAPID SANDS, LIT TLC OR Ip FINES AND CLEAN S AND (LITTLE ' SANDY OR NO FINES SOILS SP POORLY- GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY MORE THAN 50% SANDS, LITTLE OR NO FINES OF MATERIAL IS ............ LAgG Ep HAN NO. 29 SIEVE S1ZE I s SILTY SANDS. SAND -SILT MIXTURES MORE THAN 50% SANDS WITH FINES 1 OF COARSE FRAC- (APPRECIABLE AMOUNT TION PASSING OF FINES NO. 4 SIEVE SC. CLAYEY SANDS, SAND -GUY MIXTURES INORGANIC SILT5 AND VERY FINE ML SANDS. ROCK FLOUR. SILTY OR CLAYEY FINE SANDS OR CLAYEY SILTS WITH SLI4XT PLASTICITY INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM FINE SILTS GRAINED AND LIQUID LIMIT CL PLASTICITY, GRAVELLY CLAYS, SOILS CLAYS ILE53 THAN 50 SANDY CLAYS, SILTY CLAYS, LEAN CLAYS III OL ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC I III III SILTY CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY INORGANIC SILTS. MICACEOUS OR M H DIATOMACEOUS FINE SAND OR SILTY SOILS MORE THAN 50% SILTS �� OF MATERIAL is LIQUID LIQUID LIMIT INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH MS�Aj�f R, THAN NO. CLAYS GREATER THAN 5D ��/ CH PLASTICITY. FAT CLAYS LOO SIEVE SIZE O H ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICITY, ORGANIC SILTS HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT, Hu4US' SWAMP SOILS W1TN HIGH ORGANIC CONTENTS NOTE DUAL SYMBOLS ARE USED TO INDICATE BORDERLINE SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS. SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM )_RS GEOLOGIC TERMINOLOGY The geologic decription indicates the apparent depositional origin or stra- tigraphic name. Geologic identification is interpretive and subject to error. General categories of geologic deposits and descriptive information is as follows: ALLUVIUM COARSE ALLUVIUM: Sandy (and gravelly). Stratified. Deposited from fast moving waters in streams, rivers, and deltas. FINE ALLUVIUM: Clayey and /or silty. Stratified. Deposited from slow moving waters in streams, rivers, and lakes. BEDROCK Wide range of characteristics, from a hard, dense, con- solidated rock to soft, compressible, and unconsolidated soil -like material. FILL CONTROLLED: Compact, uniform material; inorganic; no debris. UNCONTROLLED: Loose or variable density. Mixture of soil types. Often contains debris and organic material. GLACIAL TILL Sandy /silty /clayey. Normally contains a wide range of grain sizes, from clay through boulders. Usually non - stratified. Deposited directly from glaciers. LAKE DEPOSITS Clayey. Laminated. Deposited from very slow moving waters in ponds and lakes. LOESS Silty. Non - stratified. Upper layer. Deposited from wind. OUTWASH Coarse alluvium deposited from glacial meltwaters. SLOPE WASH Organic and /or inorganic material washed from slopes and redeposited. TOPSOIL Contains both inorganic and organic material. Upper, black layer of soil. Formed by weathering of inorganic soil and accumulation of organic material. TUMBLEROCK Dominantly gravel, boulders and rock slabs. Deposited from gravity flow down hills or cliffs. WEATHERED BEDROCK Bedrock which has been substantially weathered through disintegration or decomposition. WEATHERED SOIL Texture and composition is transitional between topsoil and underlying non - weathered soil. ,,,r GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION TERMINOLOGY ON BORING LOGS GROUNDWATER Groundwater information is shown on boring logs: 1) under "Water Level Measurements" and 2) in the "WB" column. Information under Water Level Measurements includes: - The depth to the water level (or drilling fluid, if used) and the depth to the bottom of the hole (cave -in). Water level and cave -in measure- ments are taken with a weighted measuring tape. If free - standing water is not encountered in the hole, the term wet, or dry, is indicated under "Water Level." This means that the soil adhering to the end of the measuring tape did, or did not, respectively, appear to be saturated. - The depth sampled and the depth of casing (or hollow -stem auger) for measurements made during the progress of the boring. - Date and time of measurements. Notation in the WB column describes whether soil samples appear to be water - bearing or saturated. Y means yes, N means no, and ? means questionable or indefinite. The water level symbol, V,in the WB column indicates the apparent depth to the groundwater table at the bore hole. Determination of the depth to the groundwater table is an interpretive process. The determination is based on various factors, including: water level measurements, the appearance of samples, subsurface conditions, site conditions, and weather conditions. The accuracy of the indicated depth to the groundwater table can be quite variable. The water level symbol with an arrow pointed downward (or upward) indicates that the water level is at or below (or above) the level indi- cated. Absence of the water level symbol does not necessarily mean ground- water was not encountered, or that the water table or piezometric surface was not penetrated. The presence of groundwater in the soil and the level of the groundwater table can change with time. The information in the WB column is based on observations and measurements made at the time the boring was drilled and the water level measurements were taken. 2/85 ' GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION T 77 C° 77 7-- MARGINAL & UNFAVORABLE SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS: PROCEDURE PRINCIPALLY RELATES TO SUBSURFACE 1. Lower footing to bearing stratum or basal soils 2. Excavate /Refill 3. Partial excavate /refill 4. Additional testing 5. Deep foundation 6. Preconsolidate 7. Grouting 8. Surface compaction 9. Vibroflotation PRINCIPALLY RELATES TO BUILDING 10. Reduce footing loads 11. Reduce floor loads 12. Reduce structural loads 13. Lower and "float" building 14. Extra reinforcing in ftgs. 15. Bond beam 16. Reinforced concrete wall 17. Extra reinforced slab 18. Structural slab 19. Rigid frame foundation 20. Construct as planned - accept possibility of movement 21. Construct as planned - accept probability of movement 22. Relocate building 23. Temporarily abandon project 24. Mudjack below floor 25. Jacks below columns 26. Flexible floors 27. Build up floor aian SPECIAL DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES FOR BUILDINGS (& OTHER STRUCTURES). REDUCE COMP- RESSIBILITY DECREASE REDUCE STRENGTHEN OR INCREASE THICKNESS STRESS STRUCTURE TO STRENGTH OF OF SOFT ON SOFT WITHSTAND REMARKS SOFT SOIL SOIL SOIL MOVEMENT OTHE Bypass soft soil (surficial soil) F Replace soft soil with compacted fill F &S "Bridge over" soft soil with compacted fill F &S F Demonstrate suitability of marginal material F &S Piles or caissons F &S Preload to simulate weight of proposed F &S building or structure Strengthen soft soil with grout F &S Densify surface soil uniformly F &S Deep vibratory compaction F Widen footings Spread out or reduce height of loads Reduce no. of stories; increase number of columns or bearing walls Remove soil equal to weight of building F &S Bridge over weak spots Reinforce a course of Switch from concrete inforced concrete Use reinforcing bars Support slab on grade Continuous system of concrete beams concrete blocks block to re- beams reinforced Accept risk of possible movement Modify criteria for acceptable movement Move to better location Wait until property value appreciates Raise floor with pressure grout Raise columns to compensate for settlement Unfinished, stabilized base, or bituminous flooring Resurface floor after settlement occurs F &S F F F F F F S S S F F F &S F &S F &S F &S S F Applicable to slab -on -grade floor. Applicable to footings and load bearing walls and columns_ DEEP FOUNDATIONS A deep foundation system consists of: 1) installing shafts through surficial soils j down into the basal soil or bearing stratum, 2) constructing concrete caps or grade 11 beams on the shafts, and 3) supporting the building (or other structure) on the I caps or grade beams. Generally, a deep foundation system is less expensive than excavate /refill when the depth to the bearing stratum is greater than about 15' below the groundwater table. There are two general types of deep foundations: cast -in -place concrete and driven piles. Cast -in -place concrete systems include drilled piers (also called caissons) and augered piles. A hole is dug or augered in the ground, and the hole is then filled with concrete. Generally, a cast -in -place system is more expensive than a driven pile system when the shafts are comparatively long and the water table is comparatively high or soft swamp deposits are thick. Driven piles are made of wood, steel or pre -cast concrete. A disadvantage of driven piling is noise and vibration caused by the pile driving hammer. The noise and ground vibrations can - under certain circumstances - annoy people and damage nearby buildings and facilities. This should be taken into consideration before selecting a driven pile type of foundation system. The presence of boulders, slabs, and large pieces of debris in the ground can present problems for installing deep foundations. Problems can develop when a structure is supported on a deep foundation system and fill is present above compressible soil. The soil compresses due to the weight of the fill. This results in settlement of the ground relative to the pile- supported structure. Any objects resting in or on the ground and which are not supported by the deep foundation or the structure will also settle, and may separate from the main structure. This includes objects such as utility lines, patios, sidewalks, stoops, and bridge approaches For a deep foundation system, it is advisable to determine the soil conditions down to, and below, the bottom of proposed foundation shafts. This can be done by means of deep test borings. A ,ne GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION PRECONSOLIDATION Preconsolidation involves compressing soft soil prior to building a struc- ture. Fill is placed to simulate the load of a future structure. (For a house, this amounts to approximately 3' of fill.) The weight of the fill causes soft soil to compress. After compression, the fill is removed, and the structure is built. The rate of compression is time dependent, so extra fill can be placed in order to shorten the time span needed. Typically, the time needed ranges from about a month to a year or more. The projected length of time needed should be estimated on an individual project basis. The rate of settlement should be monitored using settlement gauges. An advantage of the procedure is its comparatively low cost. Disadvantages of the procedure include: - The margin of safety with this procedure is not as great as with more direct means of foundation preparation such as excavate /refill or a deep foundation. The degree of risk can be reduced by combining the preconsolidation procedure with other special procedures for strengthening a building against movement (as described on the attached list). - Depending on the specific site situation, partial excavation and refilling also may be required. - Before this option is adopted, additional exploration and testing may be needed to more accurately define the subsurface conditions and the engineering properties of the soil. -,oc GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION f t r s - L L - rj' 11 / 1 �rll: a CL r _f 1 L.+"a�� 1 LI � /1 1 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERIN( Project: Roadways & Utilities Lake Drive East; Alternate par II, Chanhassen, MN Je6 No: 4126 J aLJ : NA CL 0 / Zf , QJ > y f t r s - L L - rj' 11 / 1 �rll: a CL r _f 1 L.+"a�� 1 LI � /1 1 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERIN( Project: Roadways & Utilities Lake Drive East; Alternate par II, Chanhassen, MN Je6 No: 4126 J aLJ : NA t��NN�Or4 Minnesota F Department of Transportation District 5 2055 No. Lilac Drive OF TrO Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422. September 30, 1985 Ms. JoAnn Olsen Assistant City Planner City of Chanhassen 690 Coulter Drive P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 In Reply Refer To: 315 S.P. 1002 T.H. 5 Plat review of Sunnybrook Development located South of T.H. 5 and West of T.H. 101 in City of Chanhassen Carver County Dear Ms. Olsen: (612) 5453761 We are in receipt of the above referenced plat for our review in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03 Plats and Surveys. We find the plat acceptable for further development with consideration of the following comments: - The plat did not include a legal description or a dimension between the plat boundary and the highway centerline, and therefore, we could not determine the relationship of the plat boundary and the existing highway right of way. - The proposed plat shows relocation of Lake Drive near an existing entrance to T.H. 5. We recommend that the City keep the original plan for Lake Drive with connections to CSAH 17 on the west and T.H. 101 on the east, with no additional access to T.H. 5 allowed. These connections should be constructed before any significant development is allowed south of T.H. 5 in this area. If you have any questions in regard to this review, please contact Evan Green at 593 -8537. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. 651 vi i �r-rc W.M. Crawford, P District Enginee cc: Sandra Gardebring Metropolitan Council F §6WEhiinty � - An Equal Opportunity Employer CITY OF CHANHASSEN 11'Cti:llFD CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT. I` Z a U J CL Q a i ��ITY OF �� cHANHASSE� STAFF REPORT C C. DATE: Sept. 11, 1985 C.C. DATE: Sept. 23, 1985 CASE NO: 85- 1CSSUBJ, 85 -4 'REZON$-, 85 -6 SITE PLAN Prepared by: J. Olsen /v PROPOSAL: A. Subdivide 59+ acres into 2 lots of 33 and 26 acres B. Rezone 33 acres from P -4, Planned Industrial Development to P -3, Planned Community Development C. Site Plan Review for Sunnybrook Development Corp.l for a country inn LOCATION: Lot 1, Block 1, and part of Outlot A, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park 3rd Addition APPLICANT: Barney Schlender P.O. Box 472 Chanhassen, MN 55317 PRESENT ZONING: P -4, Planned Industrial District ACREAGE: 59 acres DENSITY: ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: N- Hwy. 5 & C -3; vacant S- Lake Susan E- R -la; agricultural W- P -4; vacant WATER AND SEWER: Not yet available to property. PHYSICAL CHARAC.: There are two wetlands located in the northern portion of the site. There is a steep slope at the southern portion of the site towards Lake Susan. 1990 LAND USE PLAN: Industrial Sunnybrook Development September 11, 1985 Page 2 BACKGROUND On February 27, 1985, the City Council approved the rezoning, site plan, and preliminary plat for the Sunnybrook Development located west of the County Road 17 and Highway 5 intersection on the north side of Highway 5 (Attachment #1 and #2). On February 4, 1985, the City Council approved a six month extension of the preliminary plat for the Sunnybrook Country Inn (Attachment #3). This extension expired July 27, 1985. The applicant has since chosen another location for the Sunnybrook Country Inn. The applicant is again applying for pre- liminary plat approval, rezoning and site plan review. SUBDIVISION The applicant is proposing to subdivide 59 acres into two lots of 33'and 26 north of Lake Susan (see location map). � The southern portion of this property was the previous site of the Interstate Detroit Diesel plant (Attachment M. The site is combining Lot 1, Block 1 and the eastern portion of Outlot A of the Chanhassen Lakes Business Park 3rd Addition for a total of 59 acres. The site is then splitting the area into two lots by a north /south division (Attachment #5). This results in Parcel A with 33 acres and Parcel B with 26 acres. Parcel A is proposed as the site for the Sunnybrook Country Inn and Parcel B is proposed as a future site for the manufacturing of items related to the inn, such as food products. Both sites are proposed to be served by Lake Drive East which will extend from County Road 17 to Highway 101 and beyond through the Hidden Valley subdivision. The proposed plat realigns the Lake Drive East right -of -way to the north. A feasibility study has been conducted for Lake Drive East's presently proposed alignment but adjacent property owners have not formally petitioned the City Council to conduct the remaining phases of the public improvement process. The appli- cant has initiated another feasibility study to evaluate the pro- posed realignment. Although the revised study should be completed within the next 30 -45 days, the applicant has requested that the Planning Commission and City Council evaluate his requests at this time to obtain as much feedback as possible. The City Engineer, as stated in his attached memorandum, cannot address the engineering implications of the proposed road j alignment until the revised feasibility study is completed. L Without the necessary engineering evaluation, which can only be done through the feasibility study process, staff cannot make L Sunnybrook Development September 11, 1985 Page 3 specific recommendations on this plat as we do in other sub- division requests. If, as a result of the feasibility study evaluation, the city's present alignment is maintained, the applicant would have to revise the preliminary plat for Planning Commission and City Council review. Therefore, staff is recommending that if the Planning Commission recommends approval of the subdivision, the final plat should not be approved until the realignment issue is resolved. SUBDIVISION RECOMMENDATION Should the Planning Commission approve the proposed preliminary plat, Planning staff recommends the following motion: "The Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the Subdivision #85 -16 of 59 acres into two lots of 33 and 26 acres as depicted on the plat stamped "Received August 5, 1985" with the following condition: 1. The final plat will not be approved until the alignment of Lake Drive East is resolved. If the present alignment of Lake Drive East is maintained, the applicant must revise the proposed plat and resubmit it for Planning Commission and City Council review." PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The Commissioners unanimously recommended approval of the sub- division request on a motion by Conrad and seconded by Emmings. REZONING The applicant is proposing a country inn which will include a hotel, restaurant, and recreational activities. Both Parcel A and B are zoned P -4, Planned Industrial Development. The P -4 District allows manufacturing, warehousing, etc. The applicant is proposing to rezone Parcel A (33 acres) to P -3, Planned Community Development. Zoning Ordinance No. 47 -Z, #18, amended permitted uses of the P -3 District by adding other similar uses which are found by the City Council to be a) consistent with the general character of the other Permitted Uses in the P -3 District, and b) consistent with the objectives of this District (Attachment W. The intent of the P -3 District is for developments to be charac- terized by central management, integral architectural design, and joint common use of parking. The proposed use, Sunnybrook Country Inn, will promote these objectives. The Country Inn and accessory buildings will be of the same architectural design, will use a common parking area, and will be controlled by a Sunnybrook Development September 11, 1985 Page 4 central management. Permitted in the P -3 District are high den- sity residential, commercial and industrial uses. By comparison to the proposed use, some uses may be more intense in some cases (manufacturing uses); however, as discussed in the site plan review portion of this report, the land area, site design, and location minimize the potential impacts of industrial uses on the proposed use. Therefore, staff finds that the proposed uses are consistent with the general character of other permitted uses and consistent with the district's objectives. Staff is recommending that the rezoning from P -4 to P -3 should not occur until the final plat is filed and the City has executed the development contract and financial guarantees for the development are submitted. REZONING RECOMMENDATION Planning staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the following motion: "The Planning Commission recommends approval of the Rezoning #85 -4 to rezone 33 acres of P -4 to P -3, Planned Community Development with the following condition: 1. That the rezoning from P -4 to P -3 filing of the final plat and that development contract and necessary submitted." PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION should not occur until the City has executed the financial guarantees are The Commissioners unanimously recommended approval of the rezoning of 33 acres to P -3 on a motion by Noziska and seconded by Conrad. SITE PLAN REVIEW The applicant is requesting site plan review for an inn and restaurant, carriage house, garage /stable, chapel, grist mill and recreational facilities on 33 acres of property (Parcel A). The proposal is for the same Sunnybrook Country Inn which was pre- viously approved at another site. Parcel B (26 acres) will remain vacant. Location The site of the Sunnybrook Country Inn is located on the eastern edge of the Chanhassen Lakes Business Park and overlooks Lake Susan. As discussed earlier, the site will be served by Lake f Drive East, the final alignment of which will be determined Sunnybrook Development September 11, 1985 Page 5 within 60 days. Staff will review the shown with the northern alignment, but recommendation until the exact location determined. Buildings and Lot Coverage II proposed site plan, as there can be no final of Lake Drive East is The site plan is proposing five buildings, the inn and restaurant, carriage house, garage /stable, chapel and grist mill. The walk- way and gazebo located in the south portion of Parcel A must receive DNR approval. This is a very sensitive area and should have as little alteration as possible. The land between the lots and Lake Susan belongs to the city. The proposed walkway and dock is not be allowed on this property (Attachment #9). The P -3 District allows a maximum of 30% of the lot area to be occupied by buildings. The total lot coverage of Parcel A, including parking and other impervious surfaces, equals 178. Therefore, the lot coverage meets the district requirements. Parking The following are regulations for parking for uses proposed by this site plan: 1. Place of Assembly (Carriage House) = 1 parking space /4 seats 2. Church (Chapel) = 1 parking space /3 seats 3. Hotel = 1 parking space /room plus 1 parking space /2 employees (each shift) 4. Restaurant = 1 parking space /3 seats Applying these standards, the proposed site plan would require a total of 354 parking spaces. The site plan is proposing 350 parking spaces plus 100 future parking spaces. Planning staff is recommending that four additional parking spaces be added to meet the parking regulations. Landscaping The proposed landscaping plan adds landscaping to the interior of the site. The site is heavily wooded with existing vegetation. This existing vegetation screens the buildings and parking area from surrounding properties. Staff feels the proposed landscaping is acceptable. Staff is recommending that the area south of the buildings to Lake Susan, where the slope is steep, should remain in its natural state. Sunnybrook Development September 11, 1985 Page 6 Access /Utilities (See City Engineer's Memo) Until Lake Drive East is constructed the site does not have any access and can not be utilized. Interstate Detroit Diesel, which was previously approved for this site, was also under this same constraint. The project construction could not commence until plans for the extension of Lake Drive East had been initiated (Attachment #10). Any utilities to and drainage from the site also depends on the construction of Lake Drive East. Therefore, staff can not make any final recommendations on these aspects of the site plan at this time. SITE PLAN RECOMMENDATION The impact of the Lake Drive East realignment has not yet been fully addressed or approved by the City. Until the study is completed and the location of Lake Drive East is determined, any final recommendations on the site plan can not be made. It is possible that Lake Drive East will have to remain where it ini- tially was proposed, which in turn will change the site plan and require another site plan review. Should the Planning Commission recommend approval of the site plan as presented, Planning staff recommends that the following be made conditions of approval: 1. Resolution of the Lake Drive East alignment including, if need be, the revision of the proposed plat and site plan to reflect the Lake Drive East alignment. 2. That four additional parking spaces be added to the initial phase of construction. 3. That the steep area between the buildings and Lake Susan remain in its natural state. 4. That the walkway and dock on city property be removed from the site plan. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ( On a motion by Conrad and seconded by Siegel, the Commissioners unanimously recommended the item be tabled until staff can sche- dule a public hearing at the earliest time notifying the Lake i Susan Homeowner's Association and also the land owners who are impacted by Lake Drive East. l _. C � Sunnybrook Development September 11, 1985 Page 7 1. City Council minutes dated February 27, 1984. 2. Location of previous Sunnybrook proposal. 3. City Council minutes dated February 4, 1985. 4. Location of Interstate Detroit Diesel proposal. 5. Location of proposed Parcels A and B. 6. Copy of P -3 District and amendment, Zoning Ordinance 47 -Z. 7. Alignment of Lake Drive East. 8. Proposed realignment of Lake Drive East. 9. Location of city property and proposed dock. 10. Recommendation from Interstate Detroit Diesel report. 11. City Engineer's memo dated September 6, 1985. 12. Planning Commission minutes dated September 11, 1985. 13. Site Plan for Sunnybrook Country Inn stamped "Received September 5, 1985 ". 14. Landscaping Plan for Sunnybrook Country Inn stamped "Received September 5, 1985 ". Council cieeting February 27, 1984 ___ / -2- REZONING, SUBDIVISION ISITE PLAN, SUNNYBROOK DEL. IPMENT GROUP: The City Attorney recommended that the Council action not include the rezoning. Action on the rezoning should occur at the time that the plat i presented. ouncilwoman Watson moved to approve the site plan and preliminary plat for the Sunnybrook Development Group. Motion seconded by Councilman Horn. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and Watson, Councilmen Horn. No negative votes. Motion carried. APPLICATION FOR INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS, SUNNYBROOK DEVELOPMENT GROUP: RESOLUTION #84 -08: Councilman Horn moved the adoption of a preliminary resolution subject to the condition that the bonds be privately placed and that all requirements of City Resolution #81 -07 be met prior to approval of a secnded final resolution authorizing the issuance of the bonds. Resolution he followin voted Hamilton, bCouncilwomenaSwensonnandTWatson, Councilmen Horn. No negative votes. Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING NEAR MOUNTAIN FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT STREET AND EASEMENT VACATION REQUESTS Mayor Hamilton called the hearing to order with the following interested persons present: Peter Pflaum, 18070 Breezy Point Road, Wayzata Rick Denman, Lundgren Bros. Const. Dennis Mulvey, 935 E. Wayzata Blvd. Rick Sathre, Sathre - Bergquist, Inc. There being no further comment from the public, Councilwoman Swenson moved to close the public hearing. Motion seconded by Councilman Horn. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and Watson, Councilmen Horn. No negative votes. Motion carried. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT, STREET AND EASEMENT VACATION, NEAR MOUNTAIN: — RESOLUTION #84 -09: Councilwoman Swenson moved the adoption of a resolution to accept the final development plan amendment, street and easement vaca- tion for Near Mountain PRO, Lundgren Bros. as depicted on the Sathre- Bergquist, Inc. proposed amended plan for Near Mountain and the Sathre - Bergquist, Inc. legal descriptions of proposed street, utility and drainage easement vacations dated received February 2, 1984. Resolution seconded by Councilwoman Watson. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and Watson, Councilmen Horn. No negative votes. Motion carried. MINUTES: Councilwoman Swenson moved to note the February 8, 1984, Planning Commission minutes. Motion seconded by Councilman Horn. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and Watson, Councilmen Horn. No negative votes. Motion carried. SUBDIVISION AND VARIANCE REQUEST, 1381 LAKE LUCY ROAD, TED COEY: Al Klingelhutz and Ted Coey were present. Mayor Hamilton - I wanted clarification from the staff on two items. The Lapplicant record the proposed subdivision in the form of a plat. If I can have some clarification on that, and the building plans for the proposed homes on Parcels A and B be certified by a registered architect or engineer. L" L I _ LAKE ANN -I I �I re Po 1 ' r I /� Q PAK •_� ` \�V COURT r, RO O d v i 0 - m o I e �I � W L �7 °-1 �y rArLT Southwesterly most 23.92 acres Of Tract Be Registered Land Survey No. 88. HI R x. ' STATr L A ICE SUSA N Attachment $,� REGULAR CHANHASSEN CITY i IL MEETING FEBRUARY 4, 1985 the Pledge Hamilton called the meeting to order. The meeting was opened the meeting with ,-Members Present Councilman Horn, Councilwoman Watson Councilwoman Swenson, Councilman Geving Staff Present Dan Ashworth, Barbara Dacy, Bill Monk, Roger Knutson APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Councilman Horn moved to approve the agenda as presented with the addition of discussion on the court decision regarding assessing, South Shore Senior Citizen Center, and the old Instant Web Building, Motion seconded by Councilwoman Watson, The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Watson and Swenson, Councilmen Horn and Geving. 'No negative votes. Motion carried. CONSENT AGENDA: The following items were removed from the Consent Agenda: b. Request to Extend Preliminary Plat Approval, Sunnybrook Development Group, and C. Final Plat Approval, Pioneer Hills, JCB Partnership. Councilman Geving moved to approve the following Consent Agenda items pursuant to the City Manager's recommendation: a. Revised Survey, Subdivision Request, 9201 Great Plains Blvd. ( d. Approval of Revision to Final Plat, 1140 Pleasant View Road, Ards Barnett - ((r Property. e. Approve Resolution on TH 169/212 Bridge and Culvert Replacement as Proposed by MnDOT. RESOLUTION U85 -03. f. Park Dedication Fees, Electro -Craft Corporation. Motion seconded by Councilman Horn. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Watson and Swenson, Councilmen Horn and Geving. No negative votes. Motion carried. EXTEND PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL, SUNNYBROOK DEVELOPMENT GROUP: Councilman Horn moved to grant a six month extension for the preliminary plat. Motion seconded by Councilman Geving. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Watson and Swenson, Councilmen Horn and Geving. No negative votes. Motion carried. FINAL PLAT APPROVAL, PIONEER HILLS: Councilwoman Swenson moved to approve the final Plat for Pioneer Hills with the following conditions: 1. Finalization of the Development Contract. 2. When the final plat is recorded, the applicant must also record the easement document which creates a 75 foot wide easement along the western boundary of the plat. II Motion seconded by Councilwoman Watson. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Watson and Swenson, Councilmen Horn and Geving. No negative votes. Motion carried. i MINUTES: Councilwoman Swenson moved to note the January 9, Commission minutes. Motion seconded by Councilman Horn, 1985, Planning I favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Watson and Swenson, Councilmen w Hornv andd Geving, No negative votes. Motion carried, I FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT OPUS CORPORATION chc ac� A Business Park FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT OPUS CORPORATION I C 0 R chc�h© A Business Park a �4M .LUTHERAN CHURCH 1 O SCALE 1" = 300' / OUTL T A f 39.80 AC ES I ) 1�1y� rte, pi OUTLOT B 8.66 ACRES �j INTERSTATE DETROIT DIESEL ALLISON. INC. LOT 1 LAKE SUSAN PARK 43.57 ACRES ,.. r_. LAKESUSAN %'YTA/ I it A. , T A T c C scribed tracts and parcels of land: ned Community Development District sembled on said premises: I SECTION 16. P -3 PLANNED CO1151U. are set forth m Section 19. provided. however. that all outside storage areas �](\i LAITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. 3.16.09 Boundaries of the P -3 Planned shall not comprise an area greater than' 16.01 Objectives. The P -3 Planned Community Development District. The the floor area of the principal structure Commumtv Development District is in- boundaries of the P -3 Planned Commu. on the permitted use, and shall be en- tended to provide a pre - planned develop- nity Development District shall include closed by a screen wall fence of not less' t ment of high density residential uses. 06 the following described tracts and parcels than 10 feet in height. Said screen wall• fiice buildings for administrative. finan. of land. fence shall be 100'; opaque and shall be cial and professional uses. and industrial SECTION 17. P -4 PLANNED INDUSTRI- so designed and constructed as to be uses complvmg with the standards of the AL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. architecturaliv harmonious with the P -4 Planned Industrial Development Dis- 17.01 Objectives. The P -4 Planned l principal structure. A screen planting trict. It is further intended that to the Industrial Development District is in- may be substituted for the screen wall extent reasonably possible the P -3 Dis- tended to provide a planned industrial fence at the discretion of the Council: trict be characterized by central manage- development district of high quality with provided however, that any such screen mint, integrated architectural design of regulations, controls and standards for planting shall fulfill the foregoing - I buildings, joint or common use of parking the orderly development and mainte- height and opacity requirements and other similar facilities and a harmo- nance of permitted uses therein which throughout each season of the year pious select ion and efficient distribution will be complementary to and compatible within 24 months after date of planting. of permitted uses within the district. with the predominantly suburban -rural 4. Office and administrative facilities. 1- 16.02 Permitted Uses. Within a P -3 character of the Village, and which will 5. Shipping and receiving spaces and Planned Community Development Dis- insure to the owners and occupants of mailing and order pick -up facilities. trict. no building or land shall be used permitted uses the full use. benefit and 17.04 Procedure for P4 Planned lo- ?xcept for the following uses: prestige of a planned industrial district of dustrial Development District Zoning, 1. Multiple dwellings containing not less exemplary standards in selected areas Planning and Development than twelve t 12) dwelling units. deemed especially adapted by reason of 1. Zoning, Platting and Development. 2. Administrative offices. surroundings, transportation facilities a. Procedures for the zoning, plat - 3. Medical. dental, legal and similar pro- and other facts to such land use to enable ling and development of a P -4 District fissional offices. such a district to make a fair and continu- shall be governed by the provisions of 4. Financial institutions. ing contribution to the general welfare of Sections 14.05 - 14.07 inclusive of this 5. Restaurants. the Village and its neighboring communi- ordinance. & Theaters. ties. 17.05 Building Design and Construc- 7. Industrial uses complying with the It is further intended that to the extent tion. Building design and construction standards of the P -4 Planned Industrial reasonably possible the P -4 District be within a P -4 District shall be governed by Development District. characterized by central management the provisions of Section 9.06 of this ordi- 16.03 Accessory Uses. Within a P -3 and a harmonious selection and efficient nance. except as hereinafter set forth: Planned Community Development Dis- distribution of permitted uses within the 1. Accessory Buildings. trict. the following uses shall be allowed district. a. Exteriors of accessory buildings as accessory to the permitted use: 17.02 Permitted Uses. Within a P -4 shall have the same exterior finish as 1. Subordinate uses which are clearly and Planned Industrial District. no building or the principal structure. customarily accessory to the permitted land shall be used except for the following 17.06 Performance Standards. Uses use uses: - which because of the nature of their oper- 16.04 Procedure for P -3 Planned 1. Manufacturing. compounding, process- ation are accompanied by an excess of Community Development District Zon- ing, packaging, treatment and assem- noise, vibration, dust. dirt. smoke, odor. ing. Planning and Development, bly of products and materials, but ex- noxious gases. glare or wastes shall not I. Zoning, Platting and Development. eluding uses engaged principally in the be permitted. These residual features a. Procedures for the zoning. platting processing of used products or materi- shall be deemed excessive when they and development of a P -3 District shall als and excluding the processing of exceed or deviate from the performance be governed by the provisions of Sec- animals. standards established in Section 12.07 of lions 14.05 to 14.07 inclusive of this ordi- 2. Research, testing and experimenta- this ordinance for the 1 -1 District, and the nance. lion. performance standards and procedures of 16.05 Building Design and Construe- 3. Offices. said Section 12.07 shall be applied in every tion. 4. Wholesaling and warehousing of non- case to uses within a P -4 District. 1. Multiple Residence Buildings: Within a perishable products not manufactured 17.07 Common open Space. P -3 District. building design and con- on the premises of the permitted use. 1. The establishment, use. maintenance struction for multiple residence build- provided such products are the proper. and disposition of Common Open Space ings. and buildings accessory thereto. tv of or consigned to the owner of the areas within a P-4 District shall be shall be governed by Section 8.06 of this permitted use or a lessee thereof. and governed by the provisions of Section 21 ordinance. provided further that the owner or les- of this ordinance. 2. Commercial and Industrial Buildings: see of the permitted use does not estab- 17.08 General Regulations. Within a P -3 District, building design lish said use as a freight terminal oper- L Additional regulations in the PA Plan - and construction for all buildings other ation. ned Industrial Development District than multiple residence buildings shall 17.03 Accessory Uses. Within a P -4 are set forth in Section 19. be governed by the provisions of Sec- Planned Industrial Development District. Z. 17.09 Boundaries of the P -4 Planned tion 9.06 of this ordinance, the following uses shall be allowed as 9findustrial Development District. 16.06 Land Use Intensity. accessory to the permitted use: The boundaries of the P -4 Planned 1. Commercial and Industrial Buildings: I. Subordinate uses which are clearly and Industrial Development District shall m- Within a P-3 District, not more than customarily accessory to the permitted elude the following described tracts and 30'; of the lot area shall be occupied by use. parcels of land: buildings. 2. Personnel service facilities providing SECTION 18. F -I FLOOD PLAIN & 16.07 Common Open Space. personal services. education, recrea- WATERCOURSE DISTRICT. I. The establishment. use. maintenance tion, food and convenience goods to 18.01 Purpose. The Flood Plain & and disposition of Common open Space only those personnel employed on the Watercourse District is established in the areas within a P -3 District shall be permitted use. public interest to protect persons and governed by the provisions of Section 21 3. Warehousing and outside storage of property from the hazards of flood water of this ordinance. - raw materials, supplies and equipment inundation and soil erosion, and to protect 16.08 General Regulations. used on the premises of the permitted the natural resources of the Village in- I. Additional regulations in the P3 Plan- and products manufactured or as- eluding the lakes. wetlands, marshes and ,use. Al�Y7'17(t 3 A^�u of 147- AM n--ran ,a- n e FA ) i � /„ �• ' CITY OF CIANHASSEN C CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA I� ORDINANCE 47- z I� AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 16.02 I� THE CITY COUNCIL OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: I� I� f� l L 3 f� 1 Section 1. Section 16.02 of Ordinance No. 47 entitled "The Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance," adopted February 8, 1972, and as amended heretofore, is hereby further amended by adding the following uses as additional Permitted Uses in the P -3 Planned Community Development District as set forth in said Section 16.02: 8. Motor Vehicle body repair shops 9. Motor Vehicle parts stores 10. Automobile service stations 11. Private Clubs and Private Lodges 12. Garden supply stores 13. Laundry and dry cleaning plants 14. Repair shops for home and garden equipment 15. Taverns 16. Tennis courts, handball courts, and racquetball courts 17. Off -sale liquor establishments, provided that such use is developed in conjunction'with a restaurant and /or tavern located within the same building 18. Other similar uses which are found by the City Council to be a) consistent with the general SIC character of the other Permitted Uses in the P -3 Planned Community Development District and b) con- sistent with the Objectives of this District. 7 - OUTLOT B 6.66 ACRES I Chcnha eito A Business Park O SCALE I" = 300' LUTHERAN CHURCH INTERSTATE DETROIT DIESEL ALLISON, INC. LOT 1 LAKE SUSAN PARK 0.7.57 ACRES LAKE SUSAN MT A/ LIMO r 4Y '1 Ito z IF Al 4b, r / If I 1 'y \` 1 �11I \ \O / IZ I! III/ �- J? ''�O - L' 1111 \ 1 / i CITY 6NA p55EN LUNDOVIST, ARCHITECTS Flhl t'., Nh3W slt[�uw,iws unrinalriNrw� canu�rw�n - ]Sta erww rlwnuro..ls, r,wxumw P,8MMU1'4'f'/ tl€yELOt'MENT UEN. mrr. no. _lB16 wa•s; '�• lS�AI trs'SifiSair9iTk�i" I1 0 {� I C 1 I 1 I 1 n l; _. 11j11111t 111IIIl i�t41�� �/ \.. I. j� 11 11 \\ it 1 1 1 11 \ \1 1 111 I1i3 1 1 1 1 i \ .\ ' 1 111111'1111 \�.�1 �i IItl jl\l I ", \1\\ \ \\ 11 I I IIIIII i' \ \\\ \\ \1\\111 jj k- III (��p1 1 I 1 tl - \ I I \ \II, 11 \I It ,AI'Kil ll /11 i; 11111 -I 11 1 1 I' II l j t lil,.il lI l l'l1 ll; 11' y 1 lllllil�'�lllli�ll i 1 I.,.•.; r: ' 1` Illjilllll�l�E���li �� ! ' - - I .Ill lllltl t 1 11 lil; `� I II III 11� La_,I I -2� t Itlil txl ffl \ \1\ \\\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \I r / fill � o 11 1 111 I I a \ I I � I liI�IIII��,I11�Y111I\ I . 1 1, ilk ll f If / f t11 it Illill \\\11 111 Itil 11 3 1l\ \1 _ •1 �, I Lim �� -�'i i� �- ` '� IIIN �� ® 0% :r ff I� Ill/ Ii /lit a 1 1111 1 I II 1 I If r LUNOOUIST, ARCHITECTS' _ .[In..uKK[KS [XVIKOKY[MTAL Y'��� ". A�_J23 C[._... uKt AY_..__ YIA..__ I� I ...t+ I A � IS / 1/ j I Slti '1 I� Ill/ Ii /lit a 1 1111 1 I II 1 I If r LUNOOUIST, ARCHITECTS' _ .[In..uKK[KS [XVIKOKY[MTAL Y'��� ". A�_J23 C[._... uKt AY_..__ YIA..__ I� I ...t+ Staff Report Interstate Detroit Page 5 Diesel Allison, Inc. As previously mentioned, a feasibility study will need to be done for the installation and extension of public improvements to the site. Included in this feasibility study will be a recommendation on the timing for the extension of Lake Drive East to Trunk Highway 101. The proposed lighting plan indicates shielded ground lighting on the lakeshore side of the proposed facilities. Special attention should be paid to assure that glare is not reflected off windows other reflective surfaces. Although minor modifications may be necessary as development proceeds, the proposed building and parking phasing plan adequately addresses interim traffic circulation and parking needs. Modifications which may occur would involve location of temporary curbs for interim drainage purposes and the timing of construction of the service road on the south side of the power center. It is staff's feelings that these matters should be addressed in greater detail when building per- mits for individual building phases are applied for. As in all industrial site plan approvals, the proposal will be subject to the requirements for 1) the installation of concrete curbs on the perimeter of all vehicle manuevering and parking areas, 2) the screening of rooftop mechanical equipment from view at street level, 3) the installation of shielded high pressure sodium illuminaries, and 4) maintaining all parking within the areas so designated on the approved plans. REOMMENDATION Staff recommends the following motion for Planning Commission adop- tion. The Planning Commission recommends approval of the Pen Industrial Center Site Plan submittal dated received December 15, 1983, and as marked Official Copy and contained in Planning File 83 -2 Site Plan Review with the following conditions: IThat project construction not commence until plans for the exten- L sion of street, sewer and water services to the property have been initiated. 2. That a final plan showing the revised water main looping and hydrant and service road connection location be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. That the applicant obtain all necessary local, state or federal agency permits. l_ CITY®F 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Bill Monk, City Engineer DATE: September 6, 1985 SUBJ: Sunnybrook Site Plan Extensions of watermain, storm sewer and street services to this site were detailed in a recent feasibility study for Lake Drive East between TH 101 and CR 17. However, this proposal includes the northward realignment of the frontage road which raises con- cerns regarding development impact on the property to the east (Ward), soil conditions in the area of the wetlands, and earth- work quantities. A revised study is now underway to address these items, but is at least 30 to 45 days from completion. Until the revised study is completed, I cannot fully address the engineering aspects of this proposal. However, I can state at this time that until Lake Drive East (in some alignment) is constructed, no development activity in this area should be per- mitted. Any approval of a site plan within the 3rd Addition of the Business Park should be conditioned upon full extension of utility and street improvements within Lake Drive East. c 9 PACIFI SlglF W.79 TH. 5T HIGHWgy NO. 5 OUTLOT A C.L.B.P 3rd ADD. OUTLOT C QR (CITY PORK) X -. 1 I� r I' II' p,c.. Br IJert ICnmm nc I /'�/'� c.'..,.t...,,,l ,I.., "ir low osm s A A / onsio. or .mm cosur a +rs � +� B a I LOT I BLOCK I / I C.L.B.P. 3rd ADD. I bl- LAKE SUSAN LAKE _DRIVE EAST CHANHASSEN LAKES BUSINESS PARK CHANHASSEN MINNESOTA Jm mp Tdie - PROPOSED SANITARY SEriF1i -• -• EXISTING SANITARY SEWER. -- PROPOSED WATERMAIN -- •• -• -• EXISTING WATERMAIN ON- -R7H SCALE! i*. 400' ---SEE =0N l L . ,tRN91Mr.RiN;li��51�etu55xlp�: r.`,,..,wau�'A6'IL.Pa•Sd, ...�, •,$ /'X�.:w,wa.....,. lid r 8 PACIFIC ���— SrAT f LW, 79 TH. ST \ S H /GH�yAY N0. 5 FA All ` \EXISTING ........... .. PROPOSED DETENTIDNI \ � POND IN LOW AREA \7 -z'. LAKE III SUSAN i ...... I BENIFITED AREA PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED STREET CONSTRUCTION (36' F —F) Br ome Comm qo �A SCALE: 1•'- 900 V� A ,_rt NO - i ' �.�� •• �,�� �.� LAKE• DRIVE EAST CHANHASSEN LAKES BUSINESS PARK CHANHASSEN MINNESOTA SECTIN 2 VON �1 LgKE DR. I� el Ll i W. �v a a ♦, '-'-'-'-'- PROPOSED WATERMAIN PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LAKE DRIVE EAST CHANHASSEN LAKES BUSINESS PARK CHANHASSEN , MINNESOTA Dram By Drawing Title ORR FC}iELF: , kl A} ERON R AStiOCIAT'F:H, INC. DOle' :a.asrrwa ew�an vc; ra_•.rr n•.. .suer isa sa.. umr.rr" " +.r a.c.a ."n so ra se.Ir. (e yr � -. u•i ?!� � A A / aruo. a mw co++u�r..ra •rrt' 0 NORTH SCALE: 1 "= 400' I Comm No Sheet No SECTION TI EA LAKE D I EXISTING SWA E 1 ,3 PNO GR I I \ \� BENIFITED AREA , -, -, -, _ PROPOSED STORM SEWER ................... PROPOSED STREET _,,,,,_ „_ CONSTRUCTION LAKE DRIVE EAST (36 F -F) I CHANHASSEN LAKES BUSINESS PARK () NORTH CHANHASSEN , MINNESOTA I -- SCALE: I"= 400 Drawn By ` � Dro.,nq Title Comm No ' 1 OpiR SCHF:LF; N•. .�1:�Y F. R<)ti I A•, A5K>CIATF]S. INC. Oats ' :w+uw uea.n x.. ..r. a..t •.. . ee qua eervneo •.....n q . m se a esa . teu t u. e.a. $Attl NO �, / m.woa a arotx ��..-:.. T I., -r SECTION I kwl Ir k L I Planning Commission Minutes September 11, 1985 Page 3 Dacy stated that she would have the City Engineer address these alternatives. Conrad stated that he was opposed "guest's boat ". He felt that the the dock owner could not be consi, this should not be a condition of the property owners wanted to set be fine. to the overnight docking of a property owner living behind 3ered a guest. He felt that approval. He stated that if this up privately, that would Ryan stated he was concerned about the setbacks because Kirkham Road is not an improved right -of -way. Dacy stated that the applicant will have to be 30 feet from Kirkham and at least 75 feet from the lake so he will meet the required setbacks. Noziska moved, seconded by Conrad, to recommend approval of Subdivision #85 -15 as depicted on the Preliminary Plat dated August 30, 1985 with the condition that the City Engineer and applicant work out an acceptable solution for the cul -de -sac situation and depict it on the plat before City Council review. All voted in favor and the motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING " Sunnybrook Development Corporation: a. Subdivide 59+ acres of the Chanhassen Lakes Business Park into 33 and 26 Acre Lots to Construct a Country Inn and Conference Center. b. Rezone 33 Acres from P -4, Planned Industrial Development to P -3, Planned Community Development. Public Present Barney Schlender Wanda Squire - Schlender Cal Lundquist Michelle Foster applicant applicant applicant's architect Opus Corporation Dacy stated that the applicant is proposing to subdivide 59 acres into two lots of 33 and 26 acres north of Lake Susan. She stated that Parcel A is proposed as the site for the Sunnybrook Country Inn and Parcel B is proposed as a future site for the manufac- turing of items related to the inn, such as food products. She stated that both sites are proposed to be served by Lake Drive East which will extend from County Road 17 to Highway 101 and Planning Commission Minutes September 11, 1985 Page 4 beyond through the Hidden Valley subdivision. She stated that the proposed plat realigns the Lake Drive East right -of -way to the north. She stated that a feasibility study has been con- ducted for Lake East's presently proposed alignment but adjacent property owners have not formally petitioned the City Council to conduct the remaining phases of the public improvement process. She noted that the applicant has initiated another feasibility study to evaluate the proposed realignment. She noted that - although the study should be completed within the next 30 to 45 days, the applicant has requested that Planning commission and City Council evaluate his requests to obtain as much feedback as possible. She stated that the City Engineer cannot address the engineeing implications of the proposed road alignment until the revised feasibility study is completed and without the engi- neering evaluations, staff cannot make specific recommendations on this plat. She stated that if as a result of the feasibility study the City's present alignment is maintained, the applicant would have to revise the preliminary plat for Planning Commission and City Council review. She stated that if the Planning Commission and City Council approve the subdivision that it be conditioned that the final plat should not be approved until the realignment issue is resolved. Wanda and Barney Schlender, Sunnybrook Development, were present and stated that the proposed development contains a 47 room hotel, restaurant and accessory buildings. Michelle Foster stated that Opus is in favor of this proposal and would support the realignment of Lake Drive East. She stated that Opus would like the Planning Commission to recommend approval to the City Council conditioned upon the feasibility study. She also stated that Opus understands that they would have to bear some of the expenses of the realignment. Noziska moved, seconded by Conrad, to close the public hearing. All voted in favor and the motion carried. Noziska stated that he felt that Lake Drive East made more sense by going around the pond rather than straight through the property, as long as the soils are the same. Conrad also liked the realignment if it was economically feasible. Siegel stated that if the realignment as proposed is a problem, he hopes the architect and planners could come up with an alter- native for around the ponding area. Conrad moved, seconded by Emmings, to recommend approval of Subdivision #85 -16 of 59 acres into two lots of 33 and 26 acres Planning Commission Minutes September 11, 1985 Page 5 as depicted on the plat stamped "Received August 5, 1985" with the following condition: 1. The final plat will not be approved until the alignment of Lake Drive East is resolved. If the present alignment of Lake Drive East is maintained, the applicant must revise the proposed plat and resubmit it for Planning Commission and City Council review. b. Rezone 33 Acres from P -4, Planned Industrial Development to P -3, Planned Community Development Dacy stated that the applicant is proposing a country inn which will include a hotel, restaurant, and recreational activities. She stated that Parcel A and B are zoned P -4, and is proposing to rezone Parcel A. She stated that the intent of the P -3 District is for developments to be characterized by central management, integral architectural design and joint common use of parking. She stated that the proposed use will promote these objectives. She stated that by comparison to the proposed use, some uses my be more intense in some cases; however, as discussed in the site plan review portion of this report, the land area, site design, and location minimize the potential impacts of the industrial uses on the proposed use. She stated that staff finds the pro- posed uses are consistent with the general character of other permitted uses and consistent with the district's objectives. She noted that as in the subdivision, the rezoning should not occur until the final plat is filed and the City has executed the development contract and financial guarantees for the development are submitted. Noziska moved, seconded by Conrad, to close the public hearing. All voted in favor and the motion carried. Noziska moved, seconded by Conrad to recommend approval of Rezoning 85 -4 to rezone 33 acres of P -4 to P -3, Planned Community Development with the following condition: 1. That the rezoning from P -4 to P -3 should not occur until filing of the final plat and that the City has executed the development contract and necessary financial guarantees are submitted." All voted in favor and the motion carried. fSite Plan Review for Sunnvbrook Development Corporation for a Country Inn and Conference Center on 33 Acres of Land Zoned P 4/P 3 and Located in Chanhassen Lakes Business Park between Hwy. 5 and Lake Susan Barney Schlender, ap licant. Dacy stated that the applicant is requesting site plan review for I an inn and restaurant, carriage house, garage /stable, chapel, Planning Commission Minutes September 11, 1985 Page 6 grist mill and recreational facilities on 33 acres of property. She stated that the proposal is the same Sunnybrook Country Inn which was previously approved at another site. She stated that the proposed site is located on the eatern edge of the Chanhassen Lakes Business Park and overlooks Lake Susan. She stated that as discussed earlier, the site will be served by Lake Drive East, the final alignment of which will be determined within 60 days. She stated that there can be no final recommendation until the exact location of Lake Drive is determined. She stated that the site plan is proposing five buildings; a 47 room inn and restaurant, carriage house, garage /stable, chapel and grist mill. She noted that the walkway and gazebo located in the south portion of Parcel A must receive DNR approval. She stated that the land between the lots and Lake Susan is owned by the city. She noted that the proposed walkway and dock is not allowed on this prop- erty. She noted that the total lot coverage of Parcel A including parking and other impervious surfaces equals 17% which meets the district requirements. She noted that the proposed site plan shows 350 parking spaces plus 100 future spaces but would require a total of 354 parking spaces initially and staff is recommending the applicant add four additional spaces. She noted that the proposed landscaping plan adds landscaping to the interior of the site. She stated that the site is heavily wooded with existing vegetation which screens the buildings and parking area from surrounding properties. She stated that staff is recommending the area south of the buildings to Lake Susan, where the slope is steep, remain in its natural state. She stated that until Lake Drive East is constructed, the site does not have any access and can not be utilized. She also stated that any utili- ties to and drainage from the site also depends on the construc- tion of Lake Drive East and staff can not make any final recommendations on these aspects of the site plan at this time. Noziska asked about the drainage from the parking areas. Cal Lindquist, the applicant's architect, stated that the drainage from the parking areas would drain into the ponds. Conrad asked about the recommendation regarding natural state. He wanted staff to define it. Dacy stated that there would be no grading or cutting of trees. She stated that if the applicant wanted to clear out the under brush and sod, that would be acceptable. She stated that because of the slope they want to keep it's natural topography. The Commissioners asked if the Lake Susan Homeowners Association was notified of this proposal. Planning Commission Minutes September 11, 1985 Page 7 Dacy stated that they are not within the 350 foot radius required by law. She stated that if the Commissioners wanted, staff could notify the President of the Association of the proposal and have the applicant also talk with him. The applicant stated that he would contact Lake Susan Homeowners Association President. Ryan asked if Mr. Ward was notified of the proposal, especially in regard to the realignment of Lake Drive East. Dacy stated that he was notified of the proposal as he was on the public hearing list. Barney Schlender stated that they met with three members of the Ward family plus their attorney and the site plan was reviewed then and everything was gone over just as it was presented here. He stated that they were informed that there would be a public hearing and there really was not any comments. Ryan stated that he would like to have staff verify that. He stated that he is trying to avoid having that confrontation occur in front of the City Council. Ryan also felt that all sewer, water, etc. improvements should be in Lake Drive East before the site is developed. The Commissioners liked the overall plan but felt the realignment might have some impact on the adjacent properties and wanted them aware of it. Conrad moved, seconded by Siegel, to table action on this proposal until staff can schedule a public hearing at the earliest time notifing the Lake Susan Homeowner's and also the land owners who are impacted by Lake Drive East. All voted in favor and the motion carried. Site Plan Review for a Manufacturing /Warehouse Building f Victory Envelope on 14.5 Acres of Pro erty Zoned P -3 Pla Community Development and located at the Southwest Corner Rd. 17 and Hwy. 5, Fortier Associates. annlirAnt Dacy stated that the applicant is requesting site plan review for f a 147,593 square foot warehouse /manufacturing building on a 14.5 f acre parcel in the Chanhassen Lakes Business Park. She stated that the P -3 District allows industrial uses which comply with L the standards of the P -4 District which allows manufacturing, warehousing and offices as permitted uses. She stated that the site will be served by two driveways off Park Road. She Cexplained that the westerly drive would lead to employee parking CHANHASSEN HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY In 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN. MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 MEMORANDUM TO: Housing and Redevelopment Authority FROM: Barbara Dacy, City Planner i`SD DATE: October 11, 1985 SUBJ: 1986 Budget and Cash Flow Analysis Review Attached is the HRA Amended Budget for 1985 and the proposed budget for 1986. Also enclosed is an update of the tax increment model. Staff will be prepared to make a presentation at the meeting. BD:v FUND # 460 - HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS f 1986 BUDGET BUDGET ESTIMATED BUDGET 1985 1985 1986 f PERSONAL SERVICES `. 460 4010 Salaries & Wages, Regular 22,490 29,440 31,800 460 4030 Contrib., Retirement 2,530 2,810 3,600 460 4040 Contrib., Insurance 1,520 1,500 1,700 460 4050 Workmen's Comp. 300 90 100 460 4099 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 26,840 33,840 37,200 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 460 4110 Supplies, Office 300 100 600 460 4120 Supplies, Equipment 500 460 4210 Books & Periodicals 200 460 4299 TOTAL MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 500 600 600 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 460 4300 Fees, Service 30,000 121,540 60,000 460 4310 Telephone 0 0 0 460 4320 Utilities 40,000 35,000 3,400 460 4375 Promotional Expenses 2,000 800 2,000 460 4340 Printing & Publishing 500 450 1,000 460 4360 Subscription & Memberships 250 0 0 460 4370 Travel & Training 750 600 600 460 4420 Adm. Fees (Overhead) 13,090 13,090 13,000 460 4480 Official Bonds 700 460 4481 Insurance, Building 3,500 3,500 2,500 460 4509 Remittance to Other Agencies 9,000 8,700 3,000 l 460 4510 Rep. & Maint. Bldg & Grnds 2,500 2,500 4,500 460 4599 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 102,290 186,180 90,000 CAPITAL OUTLAY 460 4701 Land Purchase & Improvements 0 5,500 3,000 460 4703 Office Equipment 1,700 0 460 4799 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 7,200 3,000 DEBT SERVICE 460 4801 Debt Principal 460 4802 Debt Interest 480,450 0 0 460 4804 S/A Payments 63,200 0 0 i p i 460 4899 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE 543,650 0 0 460 4999 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 673,280 227,820 130,800 k, Exhibit 5 A -11, 1/ �- K RECOMMENDED BUDGET MODIFICATIONS TC) COMPLETE PHASE II OF DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM QQ� � (�° Existing Actual Recamended Phase I Phase I 'Revised Budget Expenditures Budget PERSONAL SERVICES 26,840 33,600 33,840 COMMODITIES 500 400 600 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES I. Professional Services a. Downtown Plan - Re -Eval. 18,900 18,900 Braur b. Instant Web Sale 28,580 28,580 Site Planning - Braur Negotiations - Stout Architects - Freeberg Survey & Plat - S & M Legal - Grannis c. Phase II 0 0 40,000 Total Professional Srvs. 30,000 87,480 II. I.W. Operational Costs 55,000 46,500 46,500 III. Other Contractual 17,290 15,000 16,900 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 102,290 108,980 190,880 VITA' OUTLAY 0 1,100 2,500 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 129,630 144,080 227,820 C'�'�, City of Chanhassen 690 Coulter Street Chanhassen, MN 55317 Attention: Don Ashworth City Manager This is a request for Our building has been $5,000 of landscaping Because of the econom contractors, we would quickly as possible. October 8, 1985 Chanhassen Bowl, Inc. 581 West 78th Street Chanhassen, MN 55317 the $200,000 loan per our agreement. completed except for approximately and stucco. Lc reality of dealing with various appreciate your expediting this as Thank you for your usual cooperation. Sincerely, John H. Dorek, Partner Chanhassen Bowl, Inc. RECEi' ✓ED OCT 0 81985 Dn OFCHANHASSEN L HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ATTENDANCE RECORD 1985 1/17 2/21 3/21 4/4 4/18 5/30 7/11 8/15 9/19 10/17 11/21 12/19 Whitehill x x A x A x A x x Horn x x x x x x A x x Bohn x x x x x x x x x Swenson x x x x A x x x x Robbins x x x A x x x x x