4. Feasibility Study for Minnewashta Pkwy upgrade CITYOF
CIIANHASSEN
1 690 COULTER DRIV(E 6 1•2)P 9.O37. -B1O9X 00 1•4 7 F A•X C(H61A2N9A37 S5E73N9, MINNESOTA
p 55317
MEMORANDUM Y.!'n
TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager wC ^T! o
FROM: Gary Warren , City Engineer
,d2:)r
DATE: September 19, 1990 9- 70
SUBJ: Authorize Preparation of Feasibility Study for Minnewashta
Parkway Upgrade Improvement Project No. 90-15
This item was tabled from the September 10 , 1990 City Council
' meeting to address staff ' s capability to perform this work
in-house and also to discuss the project scope with the City of
Victoria as to their participation.
As to the first request, while it is true that staff availability
does not allow for preparing this study in-house , the real basis
' for the decision is to get the design consultant involved up
front in the feasibility study so they can obtain exposure to the
neighborhood and be more efficient and productive in addressing
local neighborhood issues. This worked very well on the Frontier
' Trail improvement project recently completed by Engelhardt &
Associates. On the Frontier Trail project we were quite
successful in having neighborhood involvement on the project
1 scope early on in the feasibility phase. This allowed us to make
sure that the project costs and scope accurately reflected all of
the appropriate input from the neighborhood as well as City
needs .
' Similarly , on Minnewashta Parkway I foresee the necessity for
close coordination with the residents since we will also be
1 working within some close restrictions relative to the road
right-of-way and access issues. Further, the feasibility study
element by necessity needs to incorporate survey and preliminary
1 design in order to provide a meaningful cost estimate for City
Council review. Based on these factors and the fine results
experienced on the Frontier Trail project, I have recommended
that we stick with this approach.
In the second matter concerning the City of Victoria's
participation , this office has had earlier communications with
the City of Victoria. I was unsuccessful in contacting them this
1.
Don Ashworth
September 19, 1990
Page 2 ,
week *so I cannot confirm the exact degree of their willingness to
participate at this time. Previous discussions , however,
indicated that there was an interest to be kept abreast of this
matter. Without knowing the magnitude of their share it was
difficult for them to respond at this time. That is why I had
indicated to them that the City of Chanhassen would be agreeable
to include the 1300-foot segment of the roadway lying in Victoria
in our feasibility study so we could define these issues. If
included, the City of Chanhassen would enter into a cooperative
agreement with Victoria for this work similar to our work with
MnDOT and Eden Prairie. This would proportionately allow
Chanhassen to capture the costs associated with the project
elements in Victoria including a proportionate share of the
feasibility study.
It is therefore my recommendation that the feasibility study ,
proceed forward with the understanding that one of its charges
will be to define the upgrade costs associated with the City of
Victoria segment. Staff will then work with Victoria to define
their willingness to participate in the amount of their fair
share. The City could always choose to not reconstruct the
Victoria segment of the roadway although I believe this would be
short-sighted.
It is therefore recommended that the City Council authorize the
preparation of the feasibility study for the Minnewashta Parkway
upgrade which will define, among other things , the cost
participation appropriate to the City of Victoria and, further,
that the firm of Engehlardt & Associates be designated as the
City' s engineering consultant on this project.
ktm ,
Attachment: Staff report dated September 5 , 1990
c: Bill Engelhardt '
Miriam Porter, City of Victoria
• t
I
I
,1 . .
CITY OF
, _
1 CHANHASSEN
1 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739
t Action by City Mmin}strE;
IMEMORANDUM / ),
TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager it4 c,,m:
Re)x.r
FROM: Gary Warren, City Engineer
C*r_ SL.: ._. 1c C ,-:,vial
DATE: September 5 , 1990 �-
1 Date e ,, ._
SUBJ: Authorize Preparation of Feasibility Study for q_/O_fc,
Minnewashta Parkway Upgrade
IProject No. 90-15
IFMinnewashta Parkway was constructed in its current state in the
early 70 ' s when the City installed sewer and water in what was
then County Road 15 . The present roadway is approximately a
28-foot wide rural road section with drainage ditches and minimal
I storm sewer system (see attached detail) . The road lies within a
66-foot right-of-way and is deficient in a number of areas in
road section , shoulders and geometrics . The roadway exists on
I the City' s Municipal State-Aid system with the exception of the
southerly 1 ,300 + feet which lies in the City of Victoria.
I The roadway is next up on the City's five-year State-Aid capital
improvement program. This office has had various conversations
over the last four years with residents and interested parties .
concerning the upgrade of this road section and also the
I consideration for an off-street trail along the roadway. As will
be recalled, the City did not undertake any new State-Aid
construction in 1990 in order to allow us to "catch up" with the
I construction fund encumbrances which were necessary to fund Lake
Lucy Road, Lake Drive East and Bluff Creek Drive. The timing is
therefore appropriate, if construction is to be undertaken on
schedule in 1991, that the City Council initiate a feasibility
I study to look at the upgrade of this roadway in geometrics and
road section and to address the inclusion of a trailway system as
intended by the City's master plan for this area.
1 This project would be approached similar to the Frontier Trail
upgrade in that a series of neighborhood meetings and workshops
I would be held to input the local concerns into the project
design. As such, it would be my recommendation that the firm of
William R. Engelhardt & Associates, who handled the Frontier
Trail project, be designated as the engineer on this project.
II
II
Don Ashworth 1,
September 5 , 1990
Page 2 '
It is therefore recommended that the City Council authorize a
feasibility study for the upgrade of Minnewashta Parkway from
Trunk Highway 7 to Trunk Highway 5 and that the firm of William
R. Engelhardt & Associates be designated as the engineer on this
project. Be it further resolved that City staff should contact
the City of Victoria for their input and participation on this
project.
ktm ,
Attachments: 1. Detail .
2 . Location map.
c: Engelhardt & Associates
City of Victoria '
I
1
r
I
-----SINA-11/1---11=-- momirlm MN NM NM NM INI MN • Mil ININ iii inn
. •
\ _
_____ 28'
1-41
I
,1 SLOPE 1/4. PER FT
, ,,,4.• •taitiMWLIMILSILILIMMIAmmoilvih A k .ni
Au
\17/1rooffooffooserposfoo.fforissos:soiseirstr,voiser. 31..... ‘
-..• . : • • • . --;-:-. ; ... 4.. .; . ,I.;.' •... •: .•:. i° .•r,.:. 0.•;..•.:. ,. .•;....:..:...,j;....c w..... 0:
/
ASPHALT CURB ...: ...s.::ir. .*,,... . •r . • ... ..••
—1 Y2" ASPHALT WEARING COURSE — MHD SPEC. 2341
TACK COAT — MHD SPEC. 2357
VARIABLE FULL DEPTH ASPHALT BASE — MHD SPEC 2331
4" HIGH AS COMPACTED SUB GRADE VARIABLE AGGREGATE BASE , MOD. CLASS 5
(100% CRUSHED STONE)
REQUIRED IN '
SPECS. RO AD NO. 15
DETAIL- COUNTY .
.. . .. .,.. - .... ...... - ... ...... ... .... ... • .. .. .. . ...
•
._ •
, .......... .... ...
.. ... -..... ...
... ... ...... .. .
.. ........ ..
.. •
.• . ....... . -.. -.
- .-•.•
. .... . .. ..
................
.........
.
.. ..-.
.
.. ... . . ..
.... .... . ... ...
. ... ..
...... ... - . .
...... - - .... . - ...
... ... .. . . .... ... ... .. ... . . .... ... ... .. ..
. ... . .. ... . .. .. ....
-- - - -- - - . - - • .. ... ..
...
, ... .. . .
... . .. ...
- ' -
......... - -- ... . ... . .. . .
.. .. . . .. . .... . ...
.... . .
...
.. ......
. ..
.. ....... .. ....... .
... ... .............. . - -
... ..
.. .. .
.. ... . . "
- ... .. . ' ' ..
.. ..
. . ... .
.. .... . ..... " - .. .
... .. .. .. . ..
. — ... . " .... ...
. .. . .. ..
. . ..
____ . ... ..
. LOCATION MAP WEWAPARK
°o 0 0 0 o 0 II
Q 8 M Ow M M
6200 = ST. pi
6300 LAKE / 1•; Y, �! ' �'� is C ��;.111/'. 1 jiff Alai\ '4 Q� / ter' •� h� �� /''_ ..
6400 /�ia�u N i/,� 'fie tilliiiiiiiii
ASTER .
6500 �� � ll�� j %~l -.__;�
f� L7 {6600 �I W.
.�.�eI�r.. ,*# '\ ..-J 1,t a
6700 �� SQ� �LI)� 1 )�
1111.11111 ■fie /I )
i LAKE
6800 +W./, c
���� 11/-a5/' M / N N E W A S H T A
!i' ti
69 00
7000 KINGS ROAD , ..._�
1
Q . �
Z
A
o pitilm, \ 11U �,7100 = I! LI� ,
,PQiV '\ , ?�' \���,,1'�0f 10..✓ 7..---/-
7200 n
11.41. �r������� \\���`�,/ ,)......
0 .,,,7300 --
._
= v Al i Aii,
;�� 71117
-
, 1 / e 1
"474m ._.__.NM(( l'7 c) o
7500 N/6 OLIO a A ` ,�.. tl .�
silivizzlw.7600 _. -� .iatlic7,..:.) ��_- -- ;