4. Public hearing for Cty Rd 17 upgrade CITYOF
1 1 ki 041' CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
' E (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739
' MEMORANDUM NOTE: Please bring your
copy of the feasibility
TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager study to the meeting or
' contact Kim Meuwissen if
FROM: Gary Warren, City Engineer you need another copy.
DATE: July 18 , 1990
' SUBJ: Public Hearing for County Road 17 Upgrade from
Trunk Highway 5 South to Lake Drive
' Improvement Project no. 90-4; Authorize Preparation of
Plans and Specifications
On June 25 , 1990 , the City Council accepted the feasibility study
for the upgrade of County Road 17 from Trunk Highway 5 south to
Lake Drive . Alternative A of this study was approved which
' terminates the road improvement at Riley Creek just south of the
Lake Drive connection . The project is proposed to be funded
through a combination of tax increment monies and special
' assessments.
Notices have been mailed to the property owners listed in the
Alternative A assessment roll in the feasibility study. The
' total cost of the Alternative A improvements is estimated to be
$1 ,059 ,300 . The preliminary assessment roll was prepared based
on standard City policy. These are very preliminary in nature
' and obviously will be refined as the City evaluates the
improvements and the benefitting individuals and properties. For
information purposes, the assessable portion of the project would
' probably be levied in 1991 for collection of taxes in 1992.
Staff will be available to make an appropriate presentation of
the report at the public hearing and to address any questions and
' concerns. After close of the public hearing, it would be
appropriate for the City Council to order the improvements and
authorize the preparation of the plans and specifications.
' ktm
'
Attachments: 1. June 21 , 1990 staff report. rav -
2 .2 . June 25, 1990 City Council minutes.
Affidavit of mailing. Pei4ct.
tet,:__71_L 9
' c: Gary Ehret, BRW We $LG ,., ; Carnmis t1
O1 E 'v;,UOCII
I
1
1
1
. .
i .
CITYOF
.
i ClIANBASSEN
I690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
k` (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 Actibn 6Y Ner*t' '"
I fJ+dXSi�
MEMORANDUM Plodifkd
Rifecbs.Dett
ITO. Don Ashworth, City Manager Des ;,, if
FROM: Gary Warren, City Engineer --
Det $ -"' r .rr11
IDATE: June 21 , 1990 6' -'<" /c1
SUBJ: Accept Feasibility Study for Upgrade of County Road 17
I From Trunk Highway 5 South to Lake Drive West;
Call for Public Hearing
Improvement Project No. 90-4
IIThe attached feasibility study has been prepared by BRW as
directed by the City Council on January 22 , 1990. Since the
I project involves construction of a County road, the report has
been reviewed with Mr . Roger Gustafson, Carver County Engineer.
Although the main impetus for the project has temporarily
I subsided, i.e. Lake Drive West/Redmond Products, the need to
integrate these improvements with the Trunk Highway 5
construction schedule still remains . This segment of Trunk
I Highway 5 is currently scheduled for a March, 1991 letting.
The report is based on traffic projections received from the
Eastern Carver County Transportation Study work and forecasts
I through the year 2010 . The proposed roadway section is noted in
figure 7 of the report. A divided roadway is proposed including
left-turn and right-turn lanes at the intersections to Park Road,
ILake Drive and Lake Drive West.
Two alternates are shown in the report due to the uncertainty of
the Lake Drive West project. Alternate A, which is shown in
I figure 4, shows carrying the road section through Lake Drive and
transitioning into the existing road section near Riley Creek.
Alternate B carries the divided road section through Lake Drive
II West and the intersection with Lake Susan Hills Drive. The
recommendations of the report are to proceed with the Alternate A
concept, keeping in mind that if and when Lake Drive West becomes
I a reality, Council could at that time entertain undertaking the
Alternate B expansion of this project.
The project is proposed to be funded through a combination of tax
Iincrement monies and assessments. A preliminary assessment roll
I
L
Don Ashworth
June 21 , 1990
Page 2
is provided for both alternates in the report. The project
schedule is also presented in the report showing construction of
the project in 1991 consistent with MnDOT's schedule and ultimate
completion of the project in the spring of 1992 with assessments
in 1992. The total estimated project cost for Alternate A is
$1 ,059, 300 and the total project cost for Alternate B is
$1 ,737 , 900 .
Staff and representatives from BRW will be available to review in
more detail the content of this report at Monday night 's meeting.
It is recommended that the attached feasibility study for County
Road 17 Upgrade South of Trunk Highway 5 be accepted and a public
hearing be called for July 23, 1990 .
ktm I
Attachment: Feasibility Study
c: Gary Ehret, BRW I
•
I
1
' . City Council Meeting - June 25, 1990
IIMayor Chmiel: I think we've probably moved on that portion of it.
I. Councilman Johnson: Yeah. I was just giving an idea to how we could move it
along in a week. •
IIDon Halla: Is there anything we could do along that line?
Mayor Chmiel: I don't know if there is anything right now at this particular
time other than the fact of the adjacent property owners notifying them before
II we do anything and I think they're entitled to that review and I can't see how
we could really.
1 Gary Warren: As long as Mr. Halla has an alternate plan that seems to work with
his schedule.
1 Don Ashworth: July 9th? Can we meet that timeframe as far as notifying the
neighbors?
Gary Warren: I'd say that would be our intent. That will depend on MnDot .
IICouncilman Johnson: And the notification to the neighbors, basically could very
easily describe that we're trying to change one condition of the final plat as
IIit refers to TH 101 easements.
Mayor Chmiel: Okay. So you'll do that and take care of that notification.
()1016 ACCEPT FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR UPGRADE OF COUNTY ROAD 17 FROM TRUNK HIGHWAY 5
�
U)4 SOUTH TO LAKE DRIVE WEST, CALL FOR PUBLIC HEARING.
t.
vv'' Gary Warren: Mr. Mayor, Don Ringrose is here from BRW who will give us a brief
presentation here. Overview of the project at your discretion.
1 Don Ringrose: I can be brief. I can be long. Whatever you want.
1 Mayor Chmiel: Thank you. Let's, I think we've all probably looked at this
rather extensively and maybe you can just briefly.
Don Ringrose: Okay, I think first for a couple of questions I think we need to
1 answer collectively to move on. One is you recall there's two alternatives
presented, A and B. We've recommended A. The shorter one pending some decision
on the extension of Lake Drive to the west. So with your concurrence, I would
1 think we would at this point move ahead only with Alternative A. There's no
purpose really served in presenting Alternative B at a public hearing and when
Alternative B becomes reality, if it does, that we'd have to go through
appropriate hearings on newly affected properties at that time.
II
Mayor Chmiel: Yeah, Alternate B is the one that's about $600,000.00 more.
1 Don Ringrose: Right. The other question before you tonight, as you indicated,
is the establishment of a public hearing which is recommended for July 9th. I
I/ - guess with that I would be glad to do an overview for you if you'd like.
Mayor Chmiel: Please.
1 41
I/
City Council Meeting - June 25, 1990
I/
Don Ringrose: First I think you're familiar with the project area of CR 17
south of TH 5. It's basically. . . It's proposed to upgrade the existing roadway
to 4 lane divided with urban section curb and gutter. What you have out there
now basically is a four lane rural section. The existing road is deficient in a
number of areas. First the lanes are not adequate to. . .standards for turn
lanes. There's a super elevated section now as you drive there based on
reduced design speeds and desire to have an urban section...without a super
elevations which simplifies the maintenance and drainage. . . So that's the basic
design. Alternative A roadway improvements are illustrated on this diagram for
urban section transitioning to the existing 2 lane south of new Lake Drive East.
Turn lanes. . ,turn lanes would be at all major intersections. It is not
suggested at this time that any of these intersections will be signalized. That
a traffic signals and side streets will come to a stop. Those areas shaded
along the edge of the striping. . .property that are proposed to be assessed for
roadway improvements. Again, Alternative A. This relates to the utility
improvements that would be required. They're rather minimal. No sanitary sewer
is required. The number of properties that have water services stubbed into
them and storm sewer would generally be constructed along the length of the road
to serve the new roadway generally replacing existing ditches. Twill not`with
your concurrence present this same information on Alternative B. . . Cost summary
and funding summary. The feasibility suggests that assessments would be levied
on benefitting properties consitent with existing policies and to the extent
that assessments within those existing policies aren't sufficient to cover
costs, the deficiency would be made up with tax increment funds... And on the
basis of the assumed assessments, we had calculated a preliminary or estimate of
the assessable part, in this case Alternative 8 illustrating the rates. . .
Finally, schedule as indicated this evening for the presentation of the
feasibility study suggests July 9th public hearing. The balance of this year
would be. . .basically to the design being early in the year with the majority of •i, _
the construction being roughly a year from now. 1991 time. This works into the
proposed schedule for TH 5 improvements.
Mayor Chmiel: Thank you. Are there any questions? I
Councilman Johnson: So we're talking about not presenting Alternative B
whatsoever at the Public Hearings? I
Gary Warren: We're saying that Alternate B, it could be presented. I think
what we're saying is that Alternate B at this point in time does not really come
into play until such time as we have Lake Drive West underway and the traffic
movements even with the further additions of Lake Susan Hills West underway and
at that time we would bring this back as a separate element and have the
hearings and such to deal with those affected property owners. ,
Mayor Chmiel: Yeah, I don't see the basic need to go with B at this particular
time. ,
Gary Warren: Right.
Councilman Johnson: Unless of course Lot 1, Block 1 gets resold to somebody
else and they decide to build. Is Redmond completely out of there now or is he
just on hold?
Mayor Chmiel: It's still on hold. �.
42 I
, . City Council Meeting - June 25, 1990
They owner Gary Warr en: T y how s as the o er of record.
ICouncilman Johnson: Oh, they do own it? Okay.
Mayor Chmiel: Tom, do you have any questions?
ICouncilman Workman: No, but I would move approval.
IIDon Patton: I have a question.
Mayor Chmiel: Yes, be my guest.
IIDon Patton: I thought you were still questioning the engineer.
Mayor Chmiel: No, we'll open it for any discussion right now.
II .Don Patton: My name is Don Patton with the Lake Susan Partners. I did get a
chance to look at Exhibit B and the thing I guess I'm concerned about is this is '
I a County road. It serves more than the City of Chanhassen. I'm not going to
argue that it needs to be upgraded. The thing that I am arguing is that the
cost of the road needs to be born by the people that are right off of the road.
It to me serves the County. I think that the City should be asking the County
II for money to build it. The thing that we're seeing as a part of the Lake Drive
assessment that we were •here about a month ago as I recall. We're getting to
the point where you've bled people to pay assessments for projects for a long
•
time and they keep coming and they keep coming. I'm not trying to plead that
we're talking about trying to sink a mini Donald Trump here but there's only so
much blood in the turnip. If you were the people that were having to have
$150,000.00 assessment put at your and then I can't recall some of those other
numbers, I don't think it's reasonable and I think that you should go to the
State. I think you should go to the County and get them to pay some of these as
an area charge. I'm not disagreeing that there should be some front footage
I cost but I think that there should be some cost from a greater area that's
benefitting this.
IMayor Chmiel: Thank you.
Don Ringrose: In the report there's language to the effect that suggests that
assessments as presented are in a sense a first cut and we would fully expect .
that the Council through this process may well modify it. In fact, the real
answer to that is something that's probably in 1992 at the assessment hearing.
I Mayor Chmiel: Yeah. I have one specific question that I have here too relating
to the County. What response does the County have for that particular road and
are there any dollars that the County can pick up for this specific project even
IIthough it's within the confines of the City but it is yet still County road.
Gary Warren: The response from the Carver County engineer has been basically
that he does not have the money to spend on this roadway. Was a similar
I response that the City received for CR 17 north of TH 5 with our detachment
project there where that is also local funds. I received recently from the
County a list- of capital improvements for the next 5 years that I intend to get
to the Council at the next meeting to give you an idea of the needs that they're
trying to address throughout the County area here. I think certainly that the
II43
I/
City Council Meeting - June 25, 1990
•
question should be called more specifically than just to have them casually say
that they have no money for you here. As a part of this, as I indicated in the
staff report , we have been working with Roger Gustafson, County Engineer.
Roger's aware of this. I think in all honesty, somewhat embarrassed by this.
The fact that the City's building more county roads than he is able to these
days, although he did have a nice improvement on CR 14. So I think it would be
very appropriate for the City to petition or somehow communicate with the
Commissioners, County Commissioners as far as participation on the project.
Mayor Chmiel: The other thing I had was, what's the time frame? Is it critical
that we move ahead with it as it is right now?
Gary Warren: The TH 5 relationship and the fact that Lake Drive is constructed,
we did do some interim median work with the intersection of Powers Blvd. and
Lake Drive to temporarily address the traffic movements at that intersection but
the TH 5 improvements really are the driving force for the need for this element
of the project and I guess I would say that from a constructability standpoint,
that this would be a timely point to do this.
Mayor Chmiel: The other thing I had here too is, I was looking at it probably
suggesting that we have some additional informational kind of meetings on this.
I think it 's coming up quick with public hearings for July 9th. I thought that
each of those people in and adjacent to the areas were all properly notified and
that they're fully cognizant of the fact that this was going to take place.
Councilman Johnson: For both alternates. I
Don Ashworth: I think that's true and I think that when we get into those
hearings, you'll be aware that the owners do know what's occuring. 'I would like c
to bring out that when CR 17 was initially constructed as a county project, that
was the County's responsibility to pay for that and so the bridge that is there
was paid for by the County. That's a very expensive bridge. The basic lanes,
etc. . As you move from a standard county road ditch section into urban section,
you're getting into an area that typically the County doesn't fund and yet from
a property owner's standpoint, the useability of their property becomes enhanced
if they can not have that ditch section. Basically reuse some of those lanes.
That is the position that Jerry Carlson has used. ate have met with him and
talked with him about this. He has strongly supported the project. Empak,
Frank Beddor. The other issue is, I think it's good to go back to the County
and again restate our desire to see them participate in what is a county road.
I think what they're going to come back saying is, the City is the one who
really has more dollars available. This is within a tax increment district area
and there's been a number of complaints from the County as to tax increment and
it's useage and all the rest. I think if nothing else, we have to get down to a
position to show the County that they are benefitting very extensively by our
stepping in and carrying out the construction that might typically have gone
back over to themself. They are the real winner out of this particular project.
Mayor Chmiel: Okay. Don, you wanted to say something? ,
Don Patton: Yes sir. I guess the other thing that I'm saying, I wasn't aware
that this was here until we saw it on the agenda tonight. It is a short fuse
thing and I guess the thing I'm proposing, if there are needs like that, the 11 ,
County was able to come up and fund the grading. You know there's a part of CR
44
11 City Council Meeting - Julie 25, 1990
17 that's being reconstructed as a part of the Lake Susan. As a part of the
good faith of the Lake Susan partners, they did dedicate the lane that CR 17 was
' built on. Okay? Way back when. The County built it but the partnership
dedicated that land for that and it's, what 120 foot, 125 foot right-of-way.
Considerably piece of land for half a mile. I'm suggesting that rather than all
of a sudden we need to assess not just the Lake Susan Partners but all those
owners in there a lot of dollars, that some type of a capital improvement
timing, phasing go forward and say, County. This is when we need it. We're
expecting you to do it. That was able to happen on this grading project. They
have appropriated, I think it's $250,000.00 to do that grading part. I mean
we've been working with Argue to do the design plan and create the surplus but
they've come up with money to do that project and I think that's fair in dealing
' with the adjacent landowners.
Mayor Chmiel: Of course in the same token, I think too Don we won't dispute
that the accessibility that they put in for that is a direct enhancement for
your development . . .of the roads coming into that particular area.
Don Patton: We had to build the turn lanes to get into there any way. . . We
' built those. The County didn't build those. It was the City.
Mayor Chmiel: Did you want to say something Gary?
' Gary Warren: From the timing standpoint, if Council's more comfortable with
calling a hearing for the 23rd is it, instead of the 9th, I guess we. ..
' Mayor Chmiel: I guess I'd like to see that done. Any other discussion?
Hearing none, I have a motion on the floor.
Councilman Johnson: Do you want to modify the motion to move the public hearing
' to the 23rd then?
Mayor Chmiel: Right. Tom, you made the motion.
' Councilman Johnson: It never got seconded did it.
Mayor Chmiel: No, we had a motion the floor and it died so you do you want to.
Councilman Workman: I'll modify it so that we move the date so we can what,
find other funding sources?
Mayor Chmiel: Either look at other funding sources and checking with the County
to make sure that all the people are fully aware.
Councilman Johnson: Earlier notice. Public notice.
' Councilman Workman: I would move that.
Gary Warren: And accept the feasibility study?
Mayor Chmiel: Right.
Councilman Johnson: I'll second it.
45
City Council Meeting - J. s 25, 1990 I/
Resolution $90-71: Councilman Workman moved, Councilman Johnson seconded to It
accept the feasibility study for the upgrading of County Road 17 from Trunk
Highway 5 south to Lake Drive West and to call the public hearing for July 23,
1990. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously. II
m CONSIDER ACCELERATED WATER RATE SCHEDULE FOR WATER UTILITY. '
Don Ashworth: Jean Meuwissen and Tom Chaffee areboth here. I thought that
they did an excellent job in putting together the report you have in front of
you there. It's more information regarding our utility system than you probably
ever wanted to know but it does show a number of interesting items and I think
that the primary one is that the City Council started talking about oh, 3-4
months ago and maybe even going into this past year trying to find some
mechanism to ensure that as a community we were making a statement that we
wanted to see our natural resources, more specifically our water, preserved and
that any of the existing water schedules where you would see a reduction in
water rates with the more water you consummed is actually counter productive to
any environmental type of efforts. I think ,roe'll probably be tracking in some
new areas here. I do not know of any city in the State of Minnesota and this
was again part of the thing that Deloitte had brought up, that has taken this
type of a step to put into place a rate structure that will in fact establish a
penalty for excess water useage during the summer months. As a part of that,
you've got a great deal of flexibility. What do you pick out as the quantifiers
that you're going to use. What we used was establishing, and it's a good thing
we have computers today, but the computer will go in and analyze each individual
account. Determine your...water consumption which is basically your winter
consumption and will then establish a rate that produces a quantity. We will
provide 30% above that during the summer months but anything in excess of that
30% useage over your normal winter quarter would go at this higher accelerated
schedule. What has been used for, in-house purposes is a SO cents surcharge on
that additional useage. In that process we also reduce the minimums to insure
that senior citizens, those people who were are the very low end of the schedule
would not have, right now you have certain disadvantages. Disincentives. So
for example if you're hit into the elderly area and you can use 10 or 20,000
gallons at a minimum charge, what advantage is there for you to use less water.
So our rationale was let's cut that down to as minimal a minimum as we can and
in fact provide some type of an incentive again for those seniors who do not use
that much water. There is a general rate increase. The general rate increase
is, if you take into account that there has not been a rate increase during the
past 5 years, is actually literally nothing in terms of the overall affects. '
With the surcharge, with the rate increase, I think we're still looking and we
could go since I wrote the cover report and as mine's still on here, you're
looking at a 5% to 1O% increase in their total bill. This would be for general
rates. And an average family looking at potentially $10.00 to $20.00 increase
if they maintain the same water useage rates that they did this past summer. So
for Tom's analysis, he had the computer go in. Calculate what the low quarter '
would have been from a year ago. Then provide the 30%. Then analyze what you
actually used this past summer and what your actual surcharge would have been.
Those statistics are what is used to produce the averages on page 8.
II ,
Councilman Johnson: We should have done Tom and Don's houses and seen what our
actuals would have been.
I j
46
11 90
1.
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE
I
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
' )
COUNTY OF CARVER ) ss
I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath
' deposes that she is and was on July 12 1990
the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chan-
hassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed
a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for County Road 17
upgrade frcan TH 5 south to Lake Drive
to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy
' of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and
' depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the
United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the
' names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such
by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota,
and by other appropriate records.
)/
Karen J. :n,el ,;i dt, Deputy Clerk
Subscribed and qw rn to
before me this day
of July , 1990
41 /I,1Ii/'v XAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMAAAAAAkAAA
rotary Pic AAAA“x
KIM T. MEUWISSEN
4 4 !,e; NOTARY PUBLIC- MINNESOTA
•ms's```` CARVER COUNTY
4 41. My Ccmmission Expires May 29, 1992
EXHIBIT 'A' I
Frank Beddor III et al I/
1000 Park Road
Chanhassen, MN 55317
E. Jerome Carlson &
Frank Beddor Jr. et al
1001 Park Road
Chanhassen , MN 55317 1
Edward A. Pauls
5441 Zumbra Circle
Excelsior, MN 55331
1
E. Jerome Carlson
8280 Galpin Boulevard
Chanhassen , MN 55317
Aincon Corporation
Attn: Patrick M. Gannon
200 West Highway 13
Burnsville, MN 55337
Empak, Inc. 1
Attn: Wayne Bongard
950 Lake Drive
Chanhassen, MN 55317
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
I
CITY OF
t14:44: CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739
111 July 12, 1990
Mr. Frank Beddor, III et al.
1000 Park Road
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Re: Notice of Public Hearing - Country Road 17 Upgrade
Improvement Project No. 90-4
Dear Mr. Beddor:
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing has been scheduled for public input
on the County Road 17 Upgrade Feasibility Study accepted by the City Council on
June 25, 1990. The public hearing will be held as a part of a regularly
scheduled City Council meeting on Monday, July 23, 1990. The City Council
' meeting commences at 7:30 p.m.
The project deals with the upgrade of County Road 17 to a four-lane divided
' facility with concrete median and barrier concrete curb and gutter, realignment
of existing waternain, installation of a storm drainage system and
sidewalk/trail installation. Said improvements are to be financed through a
combination of tax increment monies and special assessments. The area proposed
for assessment includes those properties abutting County Road 17 from Trunk
Highway 5 south to Lake Drive. The total project cost of said improvenents for
Alternate A is estimated to be $1,059,300.
' A copy of the feasibility study showing the project scope and costs is available
for review at City RA11 during regular business hours.
We look forward to discussing this project with you. If you have any questions
in the meantime, please call.
' Sincerely,
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
�r17
G- Warren, P.E.
C • neer
O W:ktm
1 c: Gary Ehret, BRW
I
CITYOF
• i
CHANHASSEN
- 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739
June 12 , 1990
1
Mr. Frank Beddor, III et al .
1000 Park Road
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Dear Frank: 1
It is my belief that the project described in the foregoing
letter is consistent with the conversations we have had during
the past few years. It has been delayed to assure that the
project is coordinated with the Highway 5 upgrading project.
Todd Gerhardt or I will be calling you next week to answer any
questions you may have.
Sincerely,
Don Ashworth
City Manager
DA:ktm 1
c: Todd Gerhardt, Asst. City Manager
1
1
1
1
1
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
I . .°\L (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739
1 July 12, 1990
' E. Jerome Carlson &
fir. Frank Beddor, Jr. et al.
1001 Park Road
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Re: Notice of Public Hearing - Country Road 17 Upgrade
Improvement Project No. 90-4
Dear Mr. Carlson and Mr. Beddor:
1 Notice is hereby given that a public hearing has been scheduled for public input
on the County Road 17 Upgrade Feasibility Study accepted by the City Council on
June 25, 1990. The public hearing will be held as a part of a regularly
scheduled City Council meeting on fbnday, July 23, 1990. The City Council
meeting coainences at'7:30 p.m.
The project deals with the upgrade of County Road 17 to a four-lane divided
facility with concrete median and barrier concrete curb and gutter, realignment
of existing watermain, installation of a storm drainage system and
sidewalk/trail installation. Said improvements are to be financed through a
1 combination of tax increment ironies and special assessments. The area proposed
for assessment includes those properties abutting County Road 17 from Trunk
Highway 5 south to Lake Drive. The total project cost of said improvements for
Alternate A is estimated to be $1,059,300.
1 A copy of the feasibility study showing the project scope and costs is available
for review at City Hall during regular business hours.
1 We look forward to discussing this project with you. If you have any questions
in the meantime, please call.
1 Sincerely,
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
1 r- t Warren, P.E.
sty D+•.ineer
GGW:ktm
' c: Gary Ehret, BRW
CITYOF
it
CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739
June 12 , 1990 -
1
E. Jerome Carlson &
Frank Beddor, Jr. et al .
1000 Park Road
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Dear Jerry and Frank:
It is my belief that the project described in the foregoing
letter is consistent with the conversations we have had during
the past few years . It has been delayed to assure that the
project is coordinated with the Highway 5 upgrading project.
Todd Gerhardt or I will be calling you next week to answer any
questions you may have.
Sincerely, 1
Don Ashworth
City Manager
DA:ktm
c: Todd Gerhardt, Asst. City Manager 1
1
1
1
1
1•
I
1 4
CITY OF
1 ttl, CHANHASSEN
I 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900 * FAX (612) 937-5739
IJuly 12, 1990
I E. Jerane Carlson
8280 Galpin Boulevard
Chanhassen, MN 55317
II Re: Notice of Public Hearing - Country Road 17 Upgrade
Improvement Project No. 90-4
II Dear Mr. Carlson:
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing has been scheduled for public input
II on the County Road 17 Upgrade Feasibility Study accepted by the City Council on
June 25, 1990. The public hearing will be held as a part of a regularly
scheduled City Council meeting on Monday, July 23, 1990. The City Council
meeting camiences at 7:30 p.m.
IIThe project deals with the upgrade of County Road 17 to a four-lane divided
facility with concrete median and barrier concrete curb and gutter, realignment
1 of existing watermain, installation of a storm drainage system and
sidewalk/trail installation. Said improvements are to be financed through a
combination of tax increment monies and special assessments. The area proposed
for assessment includes those properties abutting County Road 17 from Trunk
II
Highway 5 south to Lake Drive. The total project cost of said improvements for
Alternate A is estimated to be $1,059,300.
II A copy of the feasibility study showing the project scope and costs is available
for review at City Hall during regular business hours.
II We look forward to discussing this project with you. If you have any questions
in the meantime, please call.
Sincerely,
' CITY OF CHANHASSEN
II111 U1)hp."-------,
il
Warren, P.E.
ICi 3 3, • neer
GGW:ktm
IIc: Gary Ehret, BRW
II
I
CITY OF .
$1:
CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147• CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 1
(612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739
June 12 , 1990 1/ ,(
E. Jerome Carlson l/eyd W-7'
8280 Galpin Boulevard �, �,Qs
Chanhassen , MN 55317 °'"S`°'` • "'�°d ` `
-Oa-r4 of At .' I 4..13.1.fre�l� wS/`t.t•n. 'J
Dear Jerry: /
win%
It is my belief that the project described in the foregoing
letter is consistent with the conversations we have had during
the past few years . It has been delayed to assure that the 1
project is coordinated with the Highway 5 upgrading project.
Todd Gerhardt or I will be calling you next week to answer an
questions you may have. 1
Sincerely,
Do A_ . CUL A A_ 1
Don Ashworth
City Manager ,
DA:ktm 1
c: Todd Gerhardt, Asst. City Manager •
iN 2 l..+a)t$ .. P. ' °r 7K°l t
JJ�� "� a /'�.wo-�•f3
Tel G i o /: a�7['s p t+ s
r,.704
¢l S
-�.Q.,►. To r
R 3N4-• aka.., �•j►1 e.S a r. M 1.1.1 '� �y
rt Y'ca �
0.w /� �1/ )
JJ _ 41.1 4 E M�/40"t P gait. �r•A•G
I +''� O.v f` i
r. A.Mrn
a...Q iHfar�SP �..�ri••ee-�s C
Ay
wit.•. �..,�.I S.1 GI.
./..."''‘• es"
sec w rc C. 1 A q+.�..a..�s
wo..'A sA r t '4,4./ /992) .
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147• CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739
July 12, 1990
' Edward A. Pauls
5441 Zumbra Circle
Excelsior, 11N 55331
Re: Notice of Public Hearing - Country Road 17 Upgrade
Inprovenent Project No. 90-4
Dear Mr. Pauls:
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing has been scheduled for public input
on the County Road 17 Upgrade Feasibility Study accepted by the City Council on
June 25, 1990. The public hearing will be held as a part of a regularly
scheduled City Council meeting, on Monday, July 23, 1990. The City Council
meeting commences at 7:30 p.m.
The project deals with the upgrade of County Road 17 to a four-lane divided
facility with concrete median and barrier concrete curb and gutter, realignment '
of existing watermain, installation of a storm drainage system and
sidewalk/trail installation. Said improvements are to be financed through a
combination of tax increment monies and special assessments. The area proposed
for assessment includes those properties abutting County Road 17 from Trunk
' Highway 5 south to Lake Drive. The total project cost of said improvements for
Alternate A is estimated to be $1,059,300.
' A copy of the feasibility study showing the project scope and costs is available
for review at City Hall during regular business hours.
We look forward to discussing this project with you. If you have any questions
in the meantime, please call.
Sincerely,
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
i
G. Warren, P.E.
ity ;ineer
' GGW:ktm
c: Gary Ehret, BRW
I
11
. CITYOF
. v.
It
,.
blt44 CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 1
July 12, 1990
Empak, Inc.
I
Attn: Wayne Bongard
950 Lake Drive
Chanhassen, NN 55317
Re: Notice of Public Hearing - Country Road 17 Upgrade ' II
Improvement Project No. 90-4 ,
Dear Mr. Bongard: I
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing has been scheduled for public input
on the County Road 17 Upgrade Feasibility Study accepted by the City Council on
II
June 25, 1990. The public hearing will be held as a part of a regularly
scheduled City Council meeting on Monday, July 23, 1990. The City Council
meeting carrrences at 7:30 p.m. I
The project deals with the upgrade of County Road 17 to a four-lane divided
facility with concrete median and barrier concrete curb and gutter, realignment
of existing watermain, installation of a storm drainage system and II
sidewalk/trail installation. Said improvements are to be financed through a
combination of tax increment monies and special assessments. The .area proposed
for assessment includes those properties abutting County Road 17 from Trunk
II
Highway 5 south to Lake Drive. The total project cost of said improvements for
Alternate A is estimated to be $1,059,300.
A copy of the feasibility study showing the project scope and costs is available I
for review at City Hall during regular business hours.
We look forward to discussing this project with you. If you have any questions 1
in the meantime, please call.
Sincerely, I
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
V I
G= a Warren, P.E.
C. •ineer ,
O W:ktm
c: Gary Ehret, BRW II
II
•
CITY OF
i
CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739
June 12, 1990
' Empak, Inc.
Attn: Wayne Bongard
950 Lake Drive
' Chanhassen , MN 55317
Dear Wayne:
It is my belief that the project described in the foregoing
letter is consistent with the conversations we have had this past
year. Todd Gerhardt or I will be calling you next week to answer
any questions you may have.
Sincerely, •
ii-00/( Lilt cc:et:C(1 44.1“
Don Ashworth
City Manager
DA:ktm
c: Todd Gerhardt, Asst. City Manager
1
1
1
1
I
I
CITY OF
141
1044414
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147• CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 II
(612) 937-1900 • FAX(612) 937-5739
July 12, 1990 1
Amcor Corporation
Attn: Patrick M. Gannon
200 West Highway 13
Burnsville, MN 55337
Re: Notice of Public Hearing - Country Road 17 Upgrade
Improvement Project No. 90-4
Dear Mr. Gannon: 1
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing has been scheduled for public input
on the County Road 17 Upgrade Feasibility Study accepted by the City Council on
June 25, 1990. The public hearing will be held as a part of a regularly
scheduled City Council meeting on rbnday, July 23, 1990. The City Council
meeting commences at 7:30 p.m. . 1
The project deals with the upgrade of County Road 17 to a four-lane divided
facility with concrete median and barrier concrete curb and gutter, realignment
of existing hatermain, installation of a storm drainage system and
sidewalk/trail installation. Said improvements are to be financed through a
combination of tax increment monies and special assessments. The area proposed
for assessment includes those properties abutting County Road 17 from Trunk
Highway 5 south to Lake Drive. The total project cost of said improvements for
Alternate A is estimated to be $1,059,300.
A copy of the feasibility study showing the project scope and costs is available
for review at City Hall during regular business hours.
We look forward to discussing this project with you. If you have any questions 1
in the meantime, please call.
Sincerely, 1
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
r 1
Gary Warren, P.E.
• n 3•-ineer
GGW:ktm
c: Gary Ehret, BRW
1