Loading...
H-1 Business Impact Group Site PlanCITY OF CNANAASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, AN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 7901 Park Place Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Bob Generous, Senior Planner DATE: March 24, 2014 8: SUBJ: Chanhassen West Business Park PUD Amendment Business Impact Group Site Plan Planning Case #2014 -07 PROPOSED MOTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the minor amendment to the Chanhassen West Business Park Planned Unit Development (PUD) to increase the maximum building square footage within the development; and the Site Plan Review to construct a 39,240 square -foot office /warehouse building subject to the conditions of the staff report; and adopts the Findings of Fact." City Council approval requires a 2/3 majority of the entire City Council. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The applicant is requesting a Rezoning for a minor amendment to the Chanhassen West Business Park Planned Unit Development (PUD) to increase the maximum building square footage within the development; and Site Plan Review to construct a 39,240 square -foot office /warehouse building for Business impact Group on property zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) and located on part of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Chanhassen West Business Park (2410 Galpin Court). PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY The Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 4, 2014. They approved a motion to recommend approval of the amendment and site plan subject to the conditions of the staff report. The only issue that came up was to provide additional buffering along the northern property line. This question was submitted to the City's Environmental Resource Specialist. She concurred that additional landscaping along the north property line was appropriate. Staff, therefore, recommends that further landscaping be installed along the north property line in order to provide additional buffering of the views of the building, loading dock and parking lot. Suitable species for the area next to the building include arborvitae, such as Techny, and columnar trees such as Apollo or Sugar Cone maple. These selections will tolerate the shade on the site and the limited canopy Chanhassen is a Community for Lite - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow Todd Gerhardt Chanhassen West Business Park PUD Amendment/BIG Site Plan Planning Case 2014 -07 March 24, 2014 Page 2 space. To block views of the truck loading docks, staff recommends that the applicant install a hedge along the property line north of the loading docks. The shrub materials selected should provide year round coverage to a mature height of at least 5 feet to 6 feet. This condition has been added to the Planning Commission staff report in a bold format. Planning Commission minutes are in consent agenda of the March 24, 2014 City Council packet. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Chanhassen West PUD Amendment and Site Plan. ATTACHMENT Planning Commission Staff Report Dated March 4, 2014. g: \plan\2014 planning cases\2014 -07 business impact group \executive summary.doc PROPOSED MOTION: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the minor amendment to the Chanhassen West Business Park Planned Unit Development (PUD) to increase the maximum building square footage within the development; and the Site Plan Review to construct a 39,240 square -foot office /warehouse building subject to the conditions of the staff report and adopts the Findings of Fact and Recommendation." SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The developer is requesting a Rezoning for a minor amendment to the Chanhassen West Business Park Planned Unit Development (PUD) to increase the maximum building square footage within the development; and Site Plan Review to construct a 39,240 square -foot office /warehouse building for Business Impact Group on property zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) and located on part of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Chanhassen West Business Park (2410 Galpin Court). LOCATION: 2410 Galpin Court (PID- 25- 2240011) APPLICANT: Taunton Ventures LP 2411 Galpin Court Suite 120 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 278 -7822 ptauntonna impact ogr un.us PRESENT ZONING: Planned Unit Development (PUD) 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Office Industrial ACREAGE: 2.07 acres DENSITY: F.A.R. 0.44 LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION - MAKING: The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving rezonings, PUDs, and amendments to PUDs because the City is acting in its legislative or policy - making capacity. A rezoning or PUD, and amendment thereto, must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the City must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi - judicial decision. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. Planning Commission Business Impact Group — Planning Case 2014 -07 March 4, 2014 Page 2 of 15 PROPOSAL /SUMMARY The applicant is requesting a Rezoning for a minor amendment to the Chanhassen West Business Park Planned Unit Development (PUD) to increase the maximum building square footage within the development; and Site Plan Review to construct a 39,240 square -foot office /warehouse building for Business Impact Group on property zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) and located on part of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Chanhassen West Business Park (2410 Galpin Court). APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 20, Article II, Division 2, Amendments Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6, Site Plan Review Chapter 20, Article VIII, Planned Unit Development District Chapter 20, Article XXIII, Division 7, Design Standards for Commercial, Industrial and Office - Institutional Developments Chanhassen West Business Park PUD Development Design Standards On July 28, 2008, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following: An amendment to the Planned Unit Development design standards for Chanhassen West Business Park to permit a total development building square footage of 365,000. The Site Plan for Planning Case #08 -14, for a 30,500 square -foot, one -story office /warehouse building on Lot 3, Block 2, Chanhassen West Business Park (CWIII). On February 11, 2008, the Chanhassen City Council approved the site plan for a 50,000 square - foot, one -story office warehouse building on Lot 1, Block 2, Chanhassen West Business Park (BIG /Snap). On April 10, 2006, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following: The Chanhassen West Business Park PUD Amendment for a 20 -foot parking setback from Lyman Boulevard right -of -way for Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Chanhassen West Business Park. Site Plan #06 -11 for a 49,105 square -foot office /warehouse building on Lot 2, Block 2, Chanhassen West Business Park. On September 29, 2005 the Chanhassen City Council approved the final plat for Chanhassen West Business Park creating 8 lots, 3 outlots and associated right -of -way for public streets. Planning Commission Business Impact Group — Planning Case 2014 -07 March 4, 2014 Page 3 of 15 On August 22, 2005, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following: Rezoning of the property located within the Chanhassen West Business Park from Agricultural Estate District (A -2) to Planned Unit Development (PUD); Preliminary Plat for Chanhassen West Business Park, plans prepared by Schoell & Madson, Inc., dated June 17, 2005; and Wetland Alteration Permit to fill and alter wetlands within the development, plans prepared by Schoell & Madson, Inc., dated June 17, 2005. PUD AMENDMENT The applicant is requesting an amendment to the development design standards to increase the overall development building area 12,000 square feet from 365,000 square feet to 377,000 square feet. Since the proposed change in total square footage is less than five percent of the permitted building area, the proposed amendment is considered a minor amendment pursuant to section 20- 507 (c) (3) of the Chanhassen City Code. As can been seen by the building square footages compliance table below, previously the majority of the difference between the originally approved development standard and the proposed change occurred with the approval of the Waytek building. The additional building square footage was used in the creation of a mezzanine level, which provides additional storage area for the building. With this building approval, a second story of office space lead to the increase in the overall square footage. PUD Bldg. Site Lot Lot Area Building area area Estimate Site coverage Coverage (acres) (sq. ft.) F.A.R. 0.28 (acres) (s q. ft. ( %) Lot 3+ pt 1 & 2, B 1 ( Waytek ) 7.98 110,000 97,300 5.1 64 Pt Lot 1 & 2, B1 2.07 39,240 25,300 1.57 76 Lot 1, B 2 (BIG /Sna 3.8 50,000 46,500 2.66 70 Lot 2, B2 (Building 2) 3.32 49,105 40,300 2.65 80 Lot 3, B2 (CW III 2.85 30,500 34,800 1.96 68 Lot 4, B2 (Min er) 5.0 49,700 61,400 3.1 62 Lot 5, B2 (Outset 3.58 48,000 43,700 2.5 70 Outlot C 3.8 0 0 0 0 Planning Commission Business Impact Group — Planning Case 2014 -07 March 4, 2014 Page 4of15 The proposed amendment does not substantially change the trip generation of the development (potentially increasing total daily trips by 153 trips, based on a Business Park classification, Tril) Generation Oh Addition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1997), nor raise the overall size of the development above the threshold, 450,000 square feet, which would require the project to perform a mandatory Environmental Assessment Worksheet. Staff is recommending that the PUD amendment be approved as outlined below in a strike - through/bold format. In order to accommodate the increase in the square footage for this project, the PUD ordinance must be amended as follows: d. Development Standards Tabulation Box 1. Building Area Building Square Footage Breakdown Use Percent Total Square Feet PUD Bldg. 30% 199 —SN 115,500 Lot Lot Area Building area area Estimate Site coverage Site Coverage (acres) (sq. ft.) F.A.R. 0.28 (acres) (s q. ft.) ( %) Total 32.4 376,545 349,300 19.54 60 The proposed amendment does not substantially change the trip generation of the development (potentially increasing total daily trips by 153 trips, based on a Business Park classification, Tril) Generation Oh Addition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1997), nor raise the overall size of the development above the threshold, 450,000 square feet, which would require the project to perform a mandatory Environmental Assessment Worksheet. Staff is recommending that the PUD amendment be approved as outlined below in a strike - through/bold format. In order to accommodate the increase in the square footage for this project, the PUD ordinance must be amended as follows: d. Development Standards Tabulation Box 1. Building Area Building Square Footage Breakdown Use Percent Total Square Feet Office 30% 199 —SN 115,500 Light Industrial/Warehouse 70% 253;300 261,500 Total (Maximum) 363;990 377,000 The actual use percentages and square footage totals may vary provided that the total building square footages are not exceeded. 2. More than one (1) principal structure may be placed on one (1) platted lot. 3. Building height shall be limited to 3 stories or 40 feet, except for Lot 5, Block 2 (lot 5) and Lot 3, Block 1 (lot 6) which shall have a building height limit of 2 stories and 30 feet, including parapet. Planning Commission Business Impact Group — Planning Case 2014 -07 March 4, 2014 Page 5 of 15 GENERAL SITE PLAN /ARCHITECTURE The applicant is requesting site plan approval for a 39,240 square -foot, two -story office /warehouse building on the 2.07 -acre site. Access to the site will be via two driveways to the property from Galpin Court. Size Portion Placement The building has one business entrance on the southeast corner of the building. The entrance is emphasized through the use of projecting columns and the extension of the stone veneer to the roof. Additionally, copper colored, arched metal canopies are located over the entrance. Building articulation is accomplished though the use of multiple materials, use of windows and a canopied entrance, providing stone veneer columns and wainscot on street frontages and the stepping back of the building along the southern elevation. R 111 PR.. BUB°UIMNR e 11 � ° e 1 Size Portion Placement The building has one business entrance on the southeast corner of the building. The entrance is emphasized through the use of projecting columns and the extension of the stone veneer to the roof. Additionally, copper colored, arched metal canopies are located over the entrance. Building articulation is accomplished though the use of multiple materials, use of windows and a canopied entrance, providing stone veneer columns and wainscot on street frontages and the stepping back of the building along the southern elevation. Planning Commission Business Impact Group — Planning Case 2014 -07 March 4, 2014 Page 6 of 15 Material and detail Building materials consist of tilt up exposed aggregate panels, stone veneer wainscot and columns, burnished sill block window headers and sills, aluminum window and door frames, metal canopies and metal columns and wall coping. Color The primary building color is dark brown with brown entry columns and wall caps, and amber bronze window and door frames. Window headers and sills are limestone colored. The canopies as well as metal accent bands in columns are copper colored. The stone veneer along the bases and in the columns and at the entries mix tan bronze and red. Height and Roof Design Building height is 35 feet to the top of the parapet, except in columns areas where the height is 36 feet. Pitched roof elements consist of the arched canopy over the entry. Mechanical equipment shall be screened through the use of low - profile units and placement away from the edges of the roof. Facade Transparency The building includes transparent windows and or doors in all office areas of the building. Additionally, upper level windows are proposed throughout the building. All other areas shall include landscaping material and architectural detailing and articulation. For buildings with a use or function that does not readily allow windows, e.g storage areas or warehouse, the fenestration standards may be reduced. However, the architecture detailing must be provided by the use of upper level windows, the use of spandrel glass or architectural detailing which provides arches, patterning, recesses and shadowing that provide aesthetic interest. The applicant has provided the stone veneer columns at all the upper level warehouse windows. The stone veneer wainscot is continued from the east side of the building along the south side of the building, providing additional architectural detailing to the warehouse area of the building. Site Furnishing The developer will be required to provide a pedestrian connection to the city trail on Galpin Boulevard. Pedestrian ramps shall be installed at all curbs along this pathway. The developer should provide benches and /or picnic tables for employees. Planning Commission Business Impact Group — Planning Case 2014 -07 March 4, 2014 Page 7 of 15 Loading Areas, Refuse Area, etc. Loading docks are located to the west of the building. Trash containers are proposed to be located within the building. Signage The applicant shows a wall sign over the primary entrance. This sign has not been evaluated for compliance with city code. A separate sign permit will be required prior to its installation. The signage shall follow the Chanhassen West Business Park PUD. There shall be one project identification sign permitted at the entrance on Galpin Boulevard. The sign shall not exceed eight feet in height. A maximum of 80 square feet of sign area shall be permitted. The project identification sign shall not be counted against the permitted signage on an individual parcel. 1. All freestanding parcel signs shall be limited to monument signs. The sign shall not exceed eighty (80) square feet in sign display area nor be greater than eight (8) feet in height. 2. Each property shall be allowed one monument sign per street frontage. 3. The signage will have consistency throughout the development. A common theme will be introduced at the development's entrance monument and will be used throughout. The sign treatment is an element of the architecture and thus should reflect the quality of the development. The signs should be consistent in color, size, and material throughout the development. 4. Wall sign shall be permitted per city ordinance for industrial office park site. 5. All signs shall require a separate sign permit. Lighting The applicant shows five 20 -feet tall and one 15 -foot tall parking lot light along the south side of the parking lot area. Additionally, two wall- mounted wall units are included over the loading docks. The lighting fixtures are all downcast and shielded from off -site illumination. City Code permits a maximum pole height of 30 feet. Landscaping Minimum requirements for landscaping at the proposed development include 2,566 square feet of landscaped area around the parking lot, landscape islands or peninsulas, 10 trees for the parking lot. The applicant's proposed as compared to the requirements for landscape area and parking lot trees is shown in the following table. Planning Commission Business Impact Group — Planning Case 2014 -07 March 4, 2014 Page 8 of 15 Applicant meets minimum requirements for trees and landscaping in the parking lot area. Bufferyards are required along Galpin Boulevard and the north property line. The north property is installed at 75% of the total required, as directed by ordinance. Bufferyard requirements: Required Proposed Vehicular use landscape area 2,566 sq. ft. >2,566 sq. ft. Trees/ parking lot 10 trees 10 trees Islands or peninsulas/parking lot 5 islands /peninsulas 6 islands /peninsulas Applicant meets minimum requirements for trees and landscaping in the parking lot area. Bufferyards are required along Galpin Boulevard and the north property line. The north property is installed at 75% of the total required, as directed by ordinance. Bufferyard requirements: All bufferyard requirements have been met. WETLANDS AND SHORELAND AREAS The site to be developed does not have wetlands on or immediately adjacent. Further, the site does not lie within a shoreland overlay district. GRADING AND DRAINAGE The existing site directs water on the north portion of the site to the property to the north. The center of the site collects water at an on -site catch basin for entry into the stormwater system. The western and eastern parts of the site drain onto Galpin Court. The proposed design grading will direct rainwater that falls north and east of the proposed building toward the property to the north. The majority of parking lot stormwater runoff is directed into rain gardens before entering the stormwater system. Required plantings Proposed plantings Bufferyard B — north 3 overstory trees 3 Overstory trees prop. line, 420' 6 Understory trees 6 Understory trees 6 Shrubs 6 Shrubs Bufferyard C — east prop. 3 Overstory trees 6 Overstory trees line, 100' 6 Understory trees 8 Understory trees 9 Shrubs 15 Shrubs All bufferyard requirements have been met. WETLANDS AND SHORELAND AREAS The site to be developed does not have wetlands on or immediately adjacent. Further, the site does not lie within a shoreland overlay district. GRADING AND DRAINAGE The existing site directs water on the north portion of the site to the property to the north. The center of the site collects water at an on -site catch basin for entry into the stormwater system. The western and eastern parts of the site drain onto Galpin Court. The proposed design grading will direct rainwater that falls north and east of the proposed building toward the property to the north. The majority of parking lot stormwater runoff is directed into rain gardens before entering the stormwater system. Planning Commission Business Impact Group — Planning Case 2014 -07 March 4, 2014 Page 9 of 15 The developer must submit a soils report to the City The engineer shall revise the proposed grading plan to show the existing and proposed elevation at the corners of the proposed building. The plan shall be revised to show locations of proposed stockpile areas. Drainage and Treatment The submittal did not include an exhibit showing pre- and post - development drainage for the site. This is required as part of the submittal packet as well as under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Permit to Discharge Storm Water Associated with Construction Activities. Further, there was no hydrologic or hydraulic calculation summaries provided. The applicant must demonstrate that rates are not increasing off the site and that the proposed infrastructure can accommodate the newly generated runoff characteristics. The applicant is proposing two bioretention features on the property. These shall be designed and constructed per guidelines listed in the on -line version of the Minnesota Stormwater Manual which can be found here: bi!p:Hstormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?titte--Main Page &oldid =12872 No details were provided for these features. These details are required and shall include the following information: m PROPOSED BUILDING iik'oci'n' - ^ -- $ \1 \ \1\\l \�'• � \_� � �• L \V �— IllV�A / j .v The developer must submit a soils report to the City The engineer shall revise the proposed grading plan to show the existing and proposed elevation at the corners of the proposed building. The plan shall be revised to show locations of proposed stockpile areas. Drainage and Treatment The submittal did not include an exhibit showing pre- and post - development drainage for the site. This is required as part of the submittal packet as well as under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Permit to Discharge Storm Water Associated with Construction Activities. Further, there was no hydrologic or hydraulic calculation summaries provided. The applicant must demonstrate that rates are not increasing off the site and that the proposed infrastructure can accommodate the newly generated runoff characteristics. The applicant is proposing two bioretention features on the property. These shall be designed and constructed per guidelines listed in the on -line version of the Minnesota Stormwater Manual which can be found here: bi!p:Hstormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?titte--Main Page &oldid =12872 No details were provided for these features. These details are required and shall include the following information: Planning Commission Business Impact Group — Planning Case 2014 -07 March 4, 2014 Page 10 of 15 • Any soil amendments and corrections. • Pre - treatment practices to be employed and these shall be shown on the plan view and in the detail sheet. It is highly recommended that something similar to the Rain Guardian developed by Anoka Conservation District be used. • Steps that will be taken to prevent compaction and siltation of the area resulting from construction activities on the site. • Calculations demonstrating that the features will draw down in 48 hours or less. • Calculations demonstrating the features will provide treat 1 -inch water quality volume from impervious areas. The site lies within the boundaries of the Carver County Watershed Management Organization. The applicant will need to comply with their requirements for stormwater management. Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control The lot of record is over two acres in size and the majority of the lot is to be graded and developed with some impervious coverage. The minimum threshold for requiring a NPDES Construction Permit is the disturbance of one acre or more. It is clear that this threshold will be surpassed. As a result, an NPDES permit will be required and a standalone Surface Water Pollution Prevention Plan must be developed. The SWPPP must be reviewed and approved prior to any earth- disturbing activities associated with the project. Proof of permit will also be required to be on site prior to any earth - disturbing activities. The SWPPP must include all elements required by the permit. At a minimum, the following items were not found within the plan sheets provided for review. • A narrative of construction activity per Part IIIA 1. • A listing of the chain of responsibility for oversight of SWPPP implementation per Part IIIA 2. • Training documentation for those involved in the design and implementation of the SWPPP per Part IIIF. • Designs and calculations for meeting Stormwater Discharge Requirements although it is understood that this project was originally permitted under different rules so design requirements will be to that approval as administered by Carver County WMO. • Estimated preliminary quantities tabulation for all erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs per Part IIIA 5. • Impervious coverage pre - development and post - development per Part IIIA 5. • Site map showing soil types per Part IIIA 5. • A map of surface waters and wetlands within one -mile of site which will receive stormwater. The SWPPP must identify if these are special or impaired waters. Lake Hazeltine receives runoff from the site and is listed as a 303D impaired water. • The SWPPP must indicate who is responsible for the maintenance of the permanent stormwater management practices on the site and a maintenance plan to assure performance of the practice as listed in Part IIIA 5 k. Planning Commission Business Impact Group — Planning Case 2014 -07 March 4, 2014 Page 11 of 15 • The plans must show all elements required underpart IV.0 of the permit. The following items shall be incorporated into plan sheets C5.01A, C5.02A and C5.03A as applicable. • The existing Storm Catch Basin identified as ST CB on sheet CS.OlA shall either be abandoned and have the conveyance eliminated or shall have inlet protection provided prior to disturbance within the area tributary to the CB. This shall be shown on the plan sheet and included within the Sequence of Construction. • Because the site connects to city infrastructure, the City and /or their representatives shall be represented at the pre - construction meeting and shall approve the installation of BMPs. The Sequence of Construction shall be changed to reflect this. • Biolfiltration areas cannot be brought on -line until all tributary areas are stabilized. The Sequence of Construction shall reflect this. • Inlet protection shall be called out at all curb cut areas and the practice shall be included in the details. The Sequence of Construction shall reflect this need. • The swale areas must be stabilized with ditch checks, erosion control blanket or other approved best management practice. • The Sequence of Construction found on Sheet C5.02 A shall have "if required by contract' ' removed. • On sheet C5.03A, the city does not allow for the use of wooden posts for silt fence. The silt fence detail must be modified to reflect this. • On sheet C5.03A, change Maintenance Note 7 to include compaction and sediment protection from all construction related activities. CONNECTION CHARGES Surface Water Management connection charges were collected when the parcel was platted. No charges are due with the site plan review. RETAINING WALL Two retaining walls are proposed near the loading area. They are proposed to be boulder -style retaining walls. The wall located at the southwest corner of the building is 15 feet long and has a maximum height of two feet. The longer wall on the west side of the building is 46 feet long and has a maximum height of two feet. The plan shall be revised to show the top and bottom wall elevations. Planning Commission Business Impact Group — Planning Case 2014 -07 March 4, 2014 Page 12 of 15 PARKING LOT The parking lot meets the Chanhassen City Code requirements of 9 -foot by 18 -foot minimum stall dimensions, as well as the 26 -foot wide driving aisles for 90 degree parking spaces. The engineer shall show the truck turning movements in the loading area on the plan. The plan must follow all applicable State and Federal guidelines, including ADA standards for the sidewalk reconstruction. SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN Sanitary sewer and water main to be installed for this project shall be privately owned and maintained. COMPLIANCE TABLE PUD BIG Building (39,240 sq. ft.) Building Height 3 stories 2 story 40 feet 35 feet Building Setback N - 10' E - 50' N - 10'E -52' W- 30'S -30' W- 58'S -58' Parking Stalls 52 stalls 52 stalls (6,000 square feet of Office at 5 11,000 sq. ft. equals 30 stalls. 33,240 square feet of Warehouse at 1 /1,000 for first 10,000, then l/ 2,000 thereafter equals 22 stalls.) Parking Setback Hard Surface Coverage Lot Area N- 0'E -50' W- 10,S -10' 70% 1 acre N- 0'E -50' W- 10,S -10' 76 %# 2.07 acres # Hard surface coverage must average 70 percent over the entire development. Individual lots may exceed 70 percent site coverage. PARK DEDICATION FEE A portion of the park dedication fee for this property was collected with the development contract. The remaining balance of this fee is $23,121.00 and must be paid with the building permit. The developer shall install a pedestrian access to Galpin Blvd Trail. Planning Commission Business Impact Group — Planning Case 2014 -07 March 4, 2014 Page 13 of 15 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Planned Unit Development amendment and site plan review subject to the following conditions and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation: 1. The developer shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City. 2. The developer shall pay the park fee of $23,121.00 with the building permit. 3. The developer shall install a pedestrian access to the Galpin Boulevard trail. 4. The developer shall provide benches and/or picnic tables for employees. 5. The developer shall provide detail of the bioretention areas is provided showing: a. Any soil amendments and corrections, b. Pre - treatment practices to be employed and these shall be shown on the plan view and in the detail sheet (It is highly recommended that something similar to the Rain Guardian developed by Anoka Conservation District be used.), and c. Steps that will be taken to prevent compaction and siltation of the area resulting from construction activities on the site. 6. Hydrologic calculations demonstrating that the features will draw down in 48 hours or less are provided. 7. Hydrologic and water quality calculations demonstrating the features will treat 1 -inch water quality volume from impervious areas is provided. 8. An exhibit showing pre- and post- development drainage is provided. 9. Calculations shall be provided demonstrating that no increase in runoff rates will result at any point leaving the site after build out. 10. The SWPPP shall be modified such that it is a standalone document which includes all elements required by the permit. At a minimum this shall include the following elements: a. A narrative of construction activity per Part IIIA 1. b. A listing of the chain of responsibility for oversight of SWPPP implementation per Part IIIA 2. c. Training documentation for those involved in the design and implementation of the SWPPP per Part IIIF. Planning Commission Business Impact Group — Planning Case 2014 -07 March 4, 2014 Page 14 of 15 d. Designs and calculations for meeting Stormwater Discharge Requirements although it is understood that this project was originally permitted under different rules so design requirements will be to that approval as administered by Carver County WMO. e. Estimated preliminary quantities tabulation for al erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs per Part IIIA 5. f. Impervious coverage pre - development and post - development per Part IIIA 5. g. Site map showing soil types per Part IIIA 5. h. A map of surface waters and wetlands within one -mile of site which will receive stormwater. The SWPPP must identify if these are special or impaired waters. Lake Hazeltine receives runoff from the site and is listed as a 303D impaired water. i. The SWPPP must indicate who is responsible for the maintenance of the permanent stormwater management practices on the site and a maintenance plan to assure performance of the practice as listed in Part IIIA 5 k. j. The plans must show all elements required under part IV.0 of the permit. 11. The existing Storm Catch Basin identified as ST CB on sheet C5.O1A shall either be abandoned and have the conveyance eliminated or shall have inlet protection provided prior to disturbance within the area tributary to the CB. This shall be shown on the plan sheet and included within the Sequence of Construction. 12. The bioretention area must be designed and constructed following the guidelines set forth in the on -line Minnesota Stormwater Manual. 13. Because the site connects to city infrastructure, the City and/or their representatives shall be represented at the pre - construction meeting and shall approve the installation of BMPs. The Sequence of Construction shall be changed to reflect this. 14. Bioretention areas cannot be brought on -line until all tributary areas are stabilized. The Sequence of Construction shall reflect this. 15. Inlet protection shall be called out at all curb cut areas and the practice shall be included in the details. The Sequence of Construction shall reflect this need. 16. The Swale areas must be stabilized with ditch checks, erosion control blanket or other approved best management practice. 17. Silt fence or other acceptable perimeter control practices shall be extended to protect all down gradient areas including the entire frontage along Galpin Court and shall be shown on both CS.OlA and C5.02A. 18. The Sequence of Construction found on Sheet C5.02 A shall have "if required by contract' removed. 19. On sheet C5.03A, the city does not allow for the use of wooden posts for silt fence. The silt fence detail must be modified to reflect this. Planning Commission Business Impact Group — Planning Case 2014 -07 March 4, 2014 Page 15 of 16 20. On sheet C5.03A, change Maintenance Note 7 to include compaction and sediment protection from all construction related activities. 21. The plans must meet all requirements set forth by other agencies with authority over the site. The applicant is responsible to procure all necessary approvals and permissions. This includes, among others, the MN Pollution Control Agency and the Carver County Watershed Management Organization. 22. The developer must submit a soils report to the City. 23. The engineer shall revise the proposed grading plan to show the existing and proposed elevation at the corners of the proposed building. 24. The plan shall be revised to show locations of proposed stockpile areas. 25. The plan shall be revised to show the top and bottom wall elevations at points along the wall. 26. The engineer shall show the truck turning movements in the loading area on the plan. 27. The plan must follow all applicable State and Federal guidelines, including ADA standards for the sidewalk reconstruction. 28. Sanitary sewer and water main to be installed for this project shall be privately owned and maintained. 29. The applicant shall work with staff to develop a revised landscaping plan, which shall be submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of a buillding permit. Additional landscaping shall be installed along the north property line. Suitable species for the area next to the building include arborvitae, such as Techny, and columnar trees such as Apollo or Sugar Cone maple. To block views of the truck loading docks, the applicant shall install a hedge along the property line north of the loading docks. The shrub materials selected should provide year round coverage to a mature height of at least 51— 61. ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation. 2. Development Review Application. 3. Reduced Copy Existing Conditions Plan. 4. Reduced Copy Site Plan. 5. Reduced Copy Grading Plan. 6. Reduced Copy Erosion Control Plan Phase II. 7. Reduced Copy Utility Plan. Planning Commission Business Impact Group — Planning Case 2014 -07 March 4, 2014 Page 16 of 16 8. Reduced Copy Site Landscape Plan. 9. Reduced Copy Site Landscape Details. 10. Reduced Copy Architectural Site Plan. 11. Reduced Copy Floor Plan. 12. Reduced Copy Exterior Elevation. 13. Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List. gAplan\2014 planning cases\2014 -07 business impact group \staff report.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of Taunton Ventures LP On March 4, 2014, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Taunton Ventures LP for a Planned Unit Development amendment for Chanhassen West Business Park to increase the overall development building square footage from 365,000 square feet to 377,000 square feet; and site plan approval for a two - story, 39,240 square -foot office warehouse building. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed Planned Unit Development preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development, PUD. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Office /Industrial uses. 3. The legal description of the property is: part of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Chanhassen West Business Park. 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) effects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed amendment has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan, which is guided for Office Industrial Use. b) The proposed amendment is compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. This is an office buisiness park. c) The proposed amendment conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance and the PUD Standards. d) The proposed amendment will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed since this use is compatable with surrounding uses. e) The proposed amendment can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f) Traffic generation due to the proposed amendment is within capabilities of streets serving the property. 5. Site Plan Review a) The proposed project is consistent with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that maybe adopted; b) The proposed project is consistent with the Site Plan Review requirements of City Code; c) The proposed project preserves the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing areas; d) The proposed project creates a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; e) The proposed project creates a functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: 1. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; 2. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; 3. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and 4. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. f) The proposed project protects adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. 6. The planning report #2014 -07 dated March 4, 2014, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Planned Unit Development amendment increasing the overall building square footage from 365,000 to 377,000 square feet and site plan review for a two- story, 39,240 square -foot, office /warehouse building, Planning Case #2014 -07. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 0 day of March, 2014. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION LWA Its Chairman gAplan\2014 planning cases\2014 -07 business impact groupVindings of fact.doc COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division - 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address - P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227 -1300 / Fax: (952) 227 -1110 CITY OF CHANHASSEN APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Date Filed: 131 �� 60 -Day Review Deadline: c-i I it 4 Planner: Case #: o1LY ri —O�I Section 1: Application Type (check all that apply) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ......................... $600 ❑ Subdivision ❑ C t 31 t 1 $300 ADDITIONAL REQUIRED FEES: Notification Sign ................... .... $200 (City to install and remove) f-7 t-51 Property Owners' List within 500......... $3 per address (City to generate —fee determined at pre tion meeting) ❑ Escrow �f�o cording Documents. 5 ei document (CU tarf rwyN,CNARMAP /Metes & Bounds Subdivision) rea e o s or ass ......... ............................... ❑ Create over 3 lots .......................$600 + $15 per lot ❑ Metes & Bounds .........................$300 + $50 per lot ❑ Consolidate Lots ................... ...........................$150 ❑ Lot Line Adjustment .............. ...........................$150 ❑ Final Plat * ............................. ...........................$250 *Requires additional $450 escrow for attorney costs. Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. ❑ Vacation of Easements / Right -of- way ................... $300 (Additional recording fees may apply) ❑ Variance ................................ ............................... $200 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit ❑ Single - Family Residence ............................... $150 ❑ All Others ........................ ............................... $275 ❑ Zoning Appeal ....................... ............................... $100 ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment ............................ $500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal information that must accompany this application) TOTAL FEES: $44tV-4; � 10 (o I - Od Received Date Received: t I :� t I I Check Number: Project Name: Business Impact Group Warehouse Property Address or Location: Galpin Court, Chanhassen, MN 55317 ;L41 C) Parcel #: a.S -Da- 00 t 1 Legal Description: No L— rs I V Total Acreage: a -0U Wetlands Present? Present Zoning: PUt7 Present Land Use Designation: ��i �e T I a3kricv l Existing Use of Property: Vacant land Of ❑ Check box if separate narrative is attached ❑ Yes ® No Requested Zoning: No change Requested Land Use Designation: K c.i e_ ❑ Minor MUSA line for failing on -site sewers..... $100 ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Single - Family Residence . ............................... $325 ❑ All Others .......................... ............................... $425 ❑ Interim Use Permit ❑ In conjunction with Single - Family Residence.. $325 ❑ All Others .......................... ............................... $425 ❑ Grading z 1,000 cubic yards ........................... UBC ❑ Rezoning ❑ Planned Unit Development (PUD) .................. $750 n Minor Amendment to existing PUD ................. $100 ❑ All Others .......................... ............................... $500 ❑ Sign Plan Review ........................ ...........................$150 ❑� Site Plan Review ❑ Administrative ....................... ...........................$100 ❑� Commercial /Industrial Districts * ......................$500 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area2l4aQ *Include number of existing employees: and number of new employees: ❑ Residential Districts .......... ............................... $500 Plus $5 per dwelling unit ADDITIONAL REQUIRED FEES: Notification Sign ................... .... $200 (City to install and remove) f-7 t-51 Property Owners' List within 500......... $3 per address (City to generate —fee determined at pre tion meeting) ❑ Escrow �f�o cording Documents. 5 ei document (CU tarf rwyN,CNARMAP /Metes & Bounds Subdivision) rea e o s or ass ......... ............................... ❑ Create over 3 lots .......................$600 + $15 per lot ❑ Metes & Bounds .........................$300 + $50 per lot ❑ Consolidate Lots ................... ...........................$150 ❑ Lot Line Adjustment .............. ...........................$150 ❑ Final Plat * ............................. ...........................$250 *Requires additional $450 escrow for attorney costs. Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. ❑ Vacation of Easements / Right -of- way ................... $300 (Additional recording fees may apply) ❑ Variance ................................ ............................... $200 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit ❑ Single - Family Residence ............................... $150 ❑ All Others ........................ ............................... $275 ❑ Zoning Appeal ....................... ............................... $100 ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment ............................ $500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal information that must accompany this application) TOTAL FEES: $44tV-4; � 10 (o I - Od Received Date Received: t I :� t I I Check Number: Project Name: Business Impact Group Warehouse Property Address or Location: Galpin Court, Chanhassen, MN 55317 ;L41 C) Parcel #: a.S -Da- 00 t 1 Legal Description: No L— rs I V Total Acreage: a -0U Wetlands Present? Present Zoning: PUt7 Present Land Use Designation: ��i �e T I a3kricv l Existing Use of Property: Vacant land Of ❑ Check box if separate narrative is attached ❑ Yes ® No Requested Zoning: No change Requested Land Use Designation: K c.i e_ Section 3: Property Owner and Applicant Information APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Contact: Address: Phone: City /State /Zip: Cell: Email: Fax: Signature: Date: PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Paul Taunton Contact: Paul Taunton Address: 2411 Galpin Court Suite 120 Phone: (952) 278 -7822 City /State /Zip: Chanhassen y N 55317 Cell: (612) 840 -5164 Email: Ptau @ tgro .us Fax: Signature: Date: This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: t+ ++ `tYwr� Ar�I�i i S Contact: Brie.)-n- iA(DL,w, -rtcLn Address: Snc,� bpi lj -Pid Phone: o-),lR k-1 I City /State /Zip: redly , Mtn 5451 -15 Cell: i -/g31 -0;106 Email: jbnY A 1\-L v\ n (-? . hco c.61n Fax: i Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? *Other Contact Information: Property Owner Via: 181 Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Name: din )v1 416erS ❑ Applicant Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Address: Engineer Via: Ig Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy City /State /Zip: Other* Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email: ) RTe rS d i w a FLro o : U5 11111/011 '-N.-I-M V LO•l ) uoiS!naN 'ON WNS NVId SNOI114N0:) ONIISIM3 a11!11aa4S m, A1oiSIH uolslnay A�ewwns W wn5 ualeaypJa:) anmxierss NW 'N3SSVHNVHD uolieoo7 NNtld SS3NISf181S3M N3SSVHNVH3 Pa(wd dnomE)1Jtld W l SSMisnB 1uapj x.oa �mso�nax„v ai¢H+vmoom e��4awr eau 6Z6�6.TTnOH 'oNP-fmd V TWO uoiSinaa 'ON 10045 NVId 3115 01111 laa45 .mwe /i en � , n C 04SIH UOISinaa ,w AjewwnS n5 w. uope5alljaa NW 'N3SSVHNVHJ AHVd SS3NISn81S3M N3SSVHNVH:) PB!OJd dn0891JVdW1 SS3NISn9 lual 3 ww.oww. eat �nvwwnswSwaoT0n30= n , w s z so 1 '.• ° ' ' exi mine U4S a350dOMd 1 a i ' 1 11 I I 6Z66TnOH 'oN AOfmd v ZO °b:) uoislnay 'ON iaa4S NVId EJNIOVHEJ alit ioauc .n :N.u/nuwe sw� oax AdolslH uoisI naa ..- " a wnw A3ewwn5 ew�rtsrto nom uope3pp3a:) an nieirs NW 'N3SSVHNVH7 u W 3eaol HNVd Mmsn8 1S3M N3SSVHNVH:) Taafaad dnoaE) l)VdWi SS3NISn9 1ua1p w anon r T 'lilt `V _ —9 w # i �r § — _ _ oNimme 03sodOad -- — _ lit - - - - -- �' { a \ter I Ilk mommommNOTT TO CONTRACTOR woLSVmv . ,¢NNx,NxN.—F- �„NIxN,..NN„..,„., m.Nw�M,., Summary F qy..: vi. Revision History FF wEI JZI.N =SOIL EROSION/ SEOIMVmVnON CONTROL ORFRGTON TIMF 9oMmIII[ Sheet Title EROSION CONTROL PLAN - PHASE2 Sheet No. Revision F.FTx C5.02 A Iz x IN "`T ProjeQNo. HOU19929 l EEENERIEGEND �� 1 ra �<eroRs.lw PROPOSED BUILDING FEE=960.0 1 I O F.IFFEENE 0ST9 QJ PA]0 xxwm e,vm 1 `NNN„x o- 1 y_ BUSINESS IF s IMPACTGROUP EM ;� Nx,°.N.xxNT.wx Se \ ... CHANHASSEN x. r.>.¢N„,NN.NN Ts FF WEST BUSINESS x..r•a s NmE„ EENEI, PARK = SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION u I: COJR _ ,o 1ENNM,x„eaN,.�, „o�NN. Location ` " n, G16P14 CHANHASSEN, MAL Nncwx. 1.IIIF ¢SIaxY¢92s F 1 51AIMIN, ENIIn INC wxrtun mommommNOTT TO CONTRACTOR woLSVmv . ,¢NNx,NxN.—F- �„NIxN,..NN„..,„., m.Nw�M,., Summary F qy..: vi. Revision History FF wEI JZI.N =SOIL EROSION/ SEOIMVmVnON CONTROL ORFRGTON TIMF 9oMmIII[ Sheet Title EROSION CONTROL PLAN - PHASE2 Sheet No. Revision F.FTx C5.02 A Iz x IN "`T ProjeQNo. HOU19929 l EEENERIEGEND �� 1 ra �<eroRs.lw 1 I O F.IFFEENE 0ST9 QJ PA]0 xxwm e,vm 1 `NNN„x Client " y_ BUSINESS s IMPACTGROUP EM Nx,°.N.xxNT.wx Se Project CHANHASSEN x. r.>.¢N„,NN.NN Ts WEST BUSINESS x..r•a s NmE„ EENEI, PARK = SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION u I: R . ,o 1ENNM,x„eaN,.�, „o�NN. Location ` IF uxorssnaxsnxsmunuius. CHANHASSEN, MAL Nncwx. 1.IIIF ¢SIaxY¢92s F 1 51AIMIN, ENIIn INC wxrtun 1 Certification ..„.x.. .........,.... mommommNOTT TO CONTRACTOR woLSVmv . ,¢NNx,NxN.—F- �„NIxN,..NN„..,„., m.Nw�M,., Summary F qy..: vi. Revision History FF wEI JZI.N =SOIL EROSION/ SEOIMVmVnON CONTROL ORFRGTON TIMF 9oMmIII[ Sheet Title EROSION CONTROL PLAN - PHASE2 Sheet No. Revision F.FTx C5.02 A Iz x IN "`T ProjeQNo. HOU19929 �UTILRY CONSTRUCTION NOTES eumwo-.,vvo.,.rvo,.w. AT nfra Client BUSINESS IMPACT GROUP Project CHANHASSEN WEST BUSINESS PARK CHANHASSEN, MIN Certification ,..oLnvm,a Summary Revision History No.WUN SuhmlNl /Nwhion Sheet Title UTILITY PLAN Sheet No. Revision C6.01 A Projett NO. HOU19929 ,I a .I PROPOSED BUILDING \ 36.24° \\ F S \ 1 \ . , ,w a CO — ClPlh \ �UTILRY CONSTRUCTION NOTES eumwo-.,vvo.,.rvo,.w. AT nfra Client BUSINESS IMPACT GROUP Project CHANHASSEN WEST BUSINESS PARK CHANHASSEN, MIN Certification ,..oLnvm,a Summary Revision History No.WUN SuhmlNl /Nwhion Sheet Title UTILITY PLAN Sheet No. Revision C6.01 A Projett NO. HOU19929 I hk"Wwfl 0I ,l 115,10 PROPOSED BUILDING .. ",PIN C0U0.T 1 SEED MIX LEGEND CITY UwDSfAPF CODE IF y s z 0 Rnfra w 7 Client BUSINESS IMPACT GROUP Project CHANHASSEN WEST BUSINESS PARK Location CHANHASSEN, MN roup Certification Ml— Ilk Summary _ Revision History Nwm. �a�e euo�iwe,no. Sheet Title SITE LANDCAPE PLAN Sheet No. Revision L1.01 A ProjeR No. HOU19929 OCC] NONE ■ ®�m�m� ■ ■o� e���m�mo■ ■m © ©�m�mo ■ ■m PROPOSED BUILDING .. ",PIN C0U0.T 1 SEED MIX LEGEND CITY UwDSfAPF CODE IF y s z 0 Rnfra w 7 Client BUSINESS IMPACT GROUP Project CHANHASSEN WEST BUSINESS PARK Location CHANHASSEN, MN roup Certification Ml— Ilk Summary _ Revision History Nwm. �a�e euo�iwe,no. Sheet Title SITE LANDCAPE PLAN Sheet No. Revision L1.01 A ProjeR No. HOU19929 / i 11 --f-- - --- -- , X, ENTRANCE DETAIL IL /f/I��I 3 ENTRANCE �1 u.az 54111tl noRrx 1 ENTRANCE DDETAIL u.ox .I.— NOUN i/II \mil 5 ENTRANCE DETAIL �� u.Gz NORTH 'fdH "'p NORTH / z 1 ENTRANCE DETAIL �� u.oz NORTH lIL1 L> \ ENTRANCE DETAIL u.ox '�"�d "tl NORTN V ,va N,4,Ra,m �16ffi°� Client BUSINESS IMPACT GROUP Project CHANHASSEN WEST BUSINESS PARK Location CHANHASSEN, MN W WN COURT Certification Summary o<«.a 4w ewa% o Revision History 4 Submt,al /MNSUn Sheet Title SITE LANDCAPE DETAILS Sheet No. Revision L1.02 A Project No. HOU19929 IANDSGPELEGEND L> \ ENTRANCE DETAIL u.ox '�"�d "tl NORTN V ,va N,4,Ra,m �16ffi°� Client BUSINESS IMPACT GROUP Project CHANHASSEN WEST BUSINESS PARK Location CHANHASSEN, MN W WN COURT Certification Summary o<«.a 4w ewa% o Revision History 4 Submt,al /MNSUn Sheet Title SITE LANDCAPE DETAILS Sheet No. Revision L1.02 A Project No. HOU19929 Proposed Office/ Warehouse Chanhassen West Business Park Addition impact ■ 9r0Y0 TO Merchandise Agency =MW m°misi9 m"�wvm ••wuu.0 Overall Site Plan m existing entrance 4,y FROF'Ot� BULDNG1 n graphic ane plan n SERE PLAN � PERSPECTIVE VIEW from SOUTHEAST F WPM AM 1A EME FAA r6 a H06WMAN ARCHITECTS 9mHHnnH9LL.mn YOItlLLY,M SfiA r N,,— UWVMUMu.. 3410 GBIPIH Court CM1HnM1OSaen, Ma 65317 ...Nee, Business Impact Group 2411 cattle Court Suite 120 CM1a.hussen, Ma 55317 ;nSUM �� u TO IS SRESN. .S Suee THE N.FL MM w WrowarwFnxmuntlum Sm PCW9P6Mma 110.11 S. PL SUSe. WIUSMM 11941 MSn WZY am 1333 Mn no LN 1311111) in She Plan A1.0 CAIN FLOOR PLAN 0 n2nd FLOOR PLAN nr- -a HOUWMAN ARCHITECTS 2410 Galpin Chun Chanhassen, MN 55317 Business Impact Group 2411 Galpin Chan sane 120 Chanhassen, MN 55317 unsroarunos xor swunEo ua 1. an hsow'o���ai� aa..E nalsh aw aeaon oresEmoh.a"as w ma. ws un�w.noa MnWSUMMmME 1414 S.nMM.M MM 2.1411 to SR M10 use 1565 MM UMMI M CHM MI Floor Plans A2.0 Oo° O °o O O o0 O O O o0 Op 00 0 00 O rt p O rt p p ap F5 p 11 ���II1��1'1 I r-1'1 jgp p .1 ?)j 0 U r - ELEVATION w OUTH EAST VIEW O Q Q B• R R BUILDING CROSS— SECTION s NORTH sueTnr -r ELEVATION ©/ii4�!!'�Al!!!!i�{06iYMr -wrw aw ®i YYrMIt�Ywv4wY wwY� �f xMYYwwL wlwwarY� p, rvr��wMw /v /YMv �nrYw�wr.4Yww���w '®��ryv4Y4rYMY ww Y Y Yw Yt Y Y Y YM rMY YIY Y DvwwswwYa YMxvw� 6J 4YV4YYYIRY \YtaYrlAaIAw YA IYw•wlwx�lR x1.0 0 Ywr4�awMYlw -�Y. A \wr�Y[YY'NawYwt Q aYwwlYalwli Y.BY � vw�YwvYrwY � vwaa4wM -Yw Yww � YYYVa�Yrv4�v1YMr4MMS4xNa � YMMwYMIwYwrlY4YVwwwvMw ®' 4YYYe_awrwYltY MwaYY '® Yr�4�YSwweY!'wwYYYwYfMYYI� n.Oa IEW (PLUUTH EAST VIEW 4./ HOUWMAN ARCHITECTS xmeunu"0eaan wxmawurxsvOeYOSOx rxoxmwaYe 8410 Galyln CauN Chanhassan,MN Dear Business Impact Group 2411 GalMln Cove) 6.11¢120 Chanhassen. MN 55511 XNN0.ttAf4w[wE[ io eu o�waxso oE,�[ o "nlu ee,„«waauwxaYOw TME�oa�°�oxwEa"wa a;M��o� "�xwYa 6[rµxq xx [UAeIE�Th OnBMMNBOBMmA 114 M.MMMM..4MOIMM05 51414 OF wur JON 1555 on DUN M MKIED Be Exterior Elevations A3.0 I loll s NORTH sueTnr -r ELEVATION ©/ii4�!!'�Al!!!!i�{06iYMr -wrw aw ®i YYrMIt�Ywv4wY wwY� �f xMYYwwL wlwwarY� p, rvr��wMw /v /YMv �nrYw�wr.4Yww���w '®��ryv4Y4rYMY ww Y Y Yw Yt Y Y Y YM rMY YIY Y DvwwswwYa YMxvw� 6J 4YV4YYYIRY \YtaYrlAaIAw YA IYw•wlwx�lR x1.0 0 Ywr4�awMYlw -�Y. A \wr�Y[YY'NawYwt Q aYwwlYalwli Y.BY � vw�YwvYrwY � vwaa4wM -Yw Yww � YYYVa�Yrv4�v1YMr4MMS4xNa � YMMwYMIwYwrlY4YVwwwvMw ®' 4YYYe_awrwYltY MwaYY '® Yr�4�YSwweY!'wwYYYwYfMYYI� n.Oa IEW (PLUUTH EAST VIEW 4./ HOUWMAN ARCHITECTS xmeunu"0eaan wxmawurxsvOeYOSOx rxoxmwaYe 8410 Galyln CauN Chanhassan,MN Dear Business Impact Group 2411 GalMln Cove) 6.11¢120 Chanhassen. MN 55511 XNN0.ttAf4w[wE[ io eu o�waxso oE,�[ o "nlu ee,„«waauwxaYOw TME�oa�°�oxwEa"wa a;M��o� "�xwYa 6[rµxq xx [UAeIE�Th OnBMMNBOBMmA 114 M.MMMM..4MOIMM05 51414 OF wur JON 1555 on DUN M MKIED Be Exterior Elevations A3.0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on February 24, 2014, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Business Impact Group — Planning Case 2024 -07 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A ", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and sworn to before me this2d�t day of Y--k. 12014. Notary Public -M nM�t s y CwnmfseW Exp! ......� Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, March 4, 2014 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Rezoning for a minor amendment to the Chanhassen West Business Park Planned Unit Development Proposal: (PUD) to increase the maximum building square footage within the development; and Site Plan Review to construct a 36,240 square -foot office/warehouse building for Business Impact Group on property zoned Planned Unit Development PUD Applicant: Taunton Ventures, LP Property Part of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Chanhassen West Business Park Location: (2410 Galpin Court) A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us /2014 -07. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Bob Generous by Questions & email at boenerous(a)ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at Comments: 952- 227 -1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Welland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercialfindustnal. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersontrepresentative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be incuded in the report, lease contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, March 4, 2014 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Rezoning for a minor amendment to the Chanhassen West Business Park Planned Unit Development Proposal: (PUD) to increase the maximum building square footage within the development; and Site Plan Review to construct a 36,240 square -foot office /warehouse building for Business Impact Group on property zoned Planned Unit Development PUD Applicant: Taunton Ventures, LP Property Part of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Chanhassen West Business Park Location: (2410 Galpin Court) A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us /2014 -07. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Bob Generous by Questions & email at boenerous(cDci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at Comments: 952- 227 -1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wefand Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercialrindustnal. • Minnesota Stale Statute 519. 99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Cound l meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson /representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, lease contact the Manning Staff person named on the notification. CHAN WEST II LLP DANIEL J & PAMELA J CULHANE DANIEL N GRANT 8821 SUNSET TRL 2333 BOULDER RD 2357 STONE CREEK LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -9137 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7401 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7413 JC INVESTMENTS OF CHASKA LLC 1405 WEST FARM RD CHASKA, MN 55318 -9517 JOHN VOSKAMP 2375 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7403 RICHARD B & CHRYSAUNA A BUAN 2369 STONE CREEK LN W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7413 TAUNTON VENTURES LP 9980 DEERBROOK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8551 JOHN D & JODEE A MURPHY 2360 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7403 KELLY K MORLOCK 2325 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7401 RODDY Y & LAURIE L W ZIVKOVICH 2337 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7401 THOMAS V & BEVERLY L ANTILLEY 2361 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7403 JOHN F & LAURIE SULLIVAN 2346 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7403 MP DEVELOPMENT LLC 2218 LUKEWOOD DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8425 SUNNY DAY FITNESS PROPERTIES 4640 PALMER POINT RD MINNETRISTA, MN 55331 -9176 TIMOTHY J WHIPPS 2374 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7403 TOM & SOMMANA MONTHISANE VOLK - MINGER PROPERTIES LLC WAYTEK INC 2381 STONE CREEK LN W 2218 LUKEWOOD DR 2440 GALPIN CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -7413 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8425 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -4621