The URL can be used to link to this page

6 Subdivision/Am. Legion Post P.C. DATE: 2-19-02 ·k~· CITY OF CHANHASSEH C.C. DATE: 3-11-02 REVIEW DEADLINE: 3-15-02 CASE: 02-3 Sub & 02-2 SPR BY: AI-Jaff - I Z ct: :.J :J 1. 1- ::( :t - ;( :ì LJ -- - () STAFF REPORT PROPOSAL:!) Site Plan Approval for a 7,822 square foot Private Club (American Legion Post 580) Subdivision of 5.584 acres into two lots 2) LOCATION: South of Highway 5, East of Great Plains Boulevard, and north of the Citgo Gas Station. APPLICANT : Chanhassen Post #580 American Legion Housing Corporation P.O. Box 303 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)467-3455 usmess ACREAGE: 5.58 acres SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Subdivision of 5.584 acres into 2 lots. Site Plan Review for a 7,822 square foot Private Club. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi-judicial decision The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the City must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi-judicial decision. tate Hw ;;J~ Q) ""'I @ .- ITD r - - PROPOSAL~UMMARY Chanhassen American Legion Post 580 March 11 Feàmllf}' 19, 2002 Page 2 There are two actions being requested with this application - a subdivision and a site plan review for a private club containing a restaurant with a liquor license. The site is zoned BN, Business Neighborhood District, and Private Clubs are permitted in this district. The site is bordered by Highway 5 to the north, Great Plains Boulevard to the west, Citgo Gas Station and strip mall to the south and Northcott Headquarters to the east. The lot area is 5.58 acres. The Hwy. 5 Overlay District applies to the site. The site is visible directly from Highway 5. It has full access from Lake Drive East and a right in/out only from Great Plains Boulevard. (The access issue will be discussed in detail in the street section of the staff report). The site plan is for a private club (American Legion Post 580). The site plan is reasonably well developed. The building is situated parallel to Highway 5 and is proposed to utilize rock face block in a three-color blend, and fiber cement siding as the main materials. Accents are provided through the use of EIFS columns, medallions, and a band that raps around the entire building (samples will be provided at the meeting). The one issue dealing with the materials relate to color. The accent medallion does not provide any contrast from the columns and the fiber cement siding. Staff discussed changing the color of the medallion and the applicant agreed with staff's suggestion and is willing to make the change. The second building on the site will appear before the City for a site plan application at a later date and is intended to be a clinic (Park Nicollet). It is shown on the plans as a concept only. Parking for vehicles is located south and west between the two buildings. A main drive aisle, running east/west, runs along the southern portion of the site, and parking lots are located mainly along the north side of this drive aisle. One row of parking (on the future Park Nicollet site) is located south ofthe dri ve isle. Staff has been working with the applicant for several months. They have been very cooperative and have implemented staff's recommendations into the plans. The buildings hide the majority of the parking lot and the portion that abuts Highway 5 is screened by a combination of berms and landscaping. The berm has an average height of 4 feet above the parking lot. Some additional landscaping will be required to meet minimum ordinance requirements. A second point that staff discussed with the applicant revolved around the number of parking spaces required. The two users proposed shared parking. Staff had no objection to this alternative. In fact we encourage shared parking. However, we asked the applicant to provide a parking study supporting their request. The parking study, which was conducted by Benshoof and Associates, Inc., concluded that the number of parking spaces provided on-site will be able to accommodate the expected future parking demand for both land uses. A pedestrian trail runs along Lake Drive East and connects with the pedestrian bridge, which runs across Highway 5. Staff discussed a sidewalk that runs north/south, through the Legion Chanhassen American Legion Post 580 March 11 Feàmary 19, 2002 Page 3 parking lot and connect the building with the sidewalk on Lake Drive East. The applicant introduced a sidewalk that runs between the Legion and future clinic site. Staff regards the project as a reasonable use of the land. Based upon the foregoing, staff is recommending approval of the site plan, and subdivision requests for this proposal. SUBDIVISION The applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval to replat 5.584 acres into two lots. The site is zoned BN, Neighborhood Business District and is located south of Highway 5, east of Great Plains Boulevard, and north of the Citgo Gas Station. Lot 1 is proposed to be the future site of a clinic (Park Nicollet). Lot 2 will house the American Legion. The ordinance states that "All lots shall abut for their full required minimum frontage on a public street as required by the zoning ordinance; or be accessed by a private street; or a flag lot which shall have a minimum of thirty feet offrontage on a public street." Lot 2, has frontage on Highway 5 and therefore meets the intent of the ordinance and is not a landlocked parcel. Access on the other hand is gained from Lake Drive East via a private street and a cross access agreement between the two properties. Private streets are permitted in this district if the following conditions exist: · The prevailing development pattern makes it unfeasible or inappropriate to construct a public street. In making this determination the city may consider the location of existing property lines and homes, local or geographic conditions and the existence of wetlands. · After reviewing the surrounding area, it is concluded that an extension of the public street system is not required to serve other parcels in the area, improve access, or to provide a street system consistent with the comprehensive plan. · The use of a private street will permit enhanced protection of the city's natural resources including wetlands and forested areas. A public street is not required to serve these parcels. In fact, the majority of our commercial establishments have cross access easements, share curb cuts and access (Market Square, Chanhassen Retail, Frontier, Byerly's, etc.) Access to the subdivision will be provided via a full access curb cut off of Lake Drive East and a right in/out only off of Great Plains Boulevard. The subdivision request is a relatively straightforward action and staff is recommending approval with conditions. I. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance; Chanhassen American Legion Post 580 March 11 Feàrullfj' 19, 2002 Page 4 SUBDIVISION FINDINGS Finding: The subdivision meets the intent of the city code subject to the conditions of the staff report. 2. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; Finding: The proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable plans. 3. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; Finding: The proposed site is suitable for development subject to the conditions specified in this report. 4. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; Finding: The proposed subdivision will be served by adequate urban infrastructure. 5. The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage; Finding: The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage subject to conditions if approved. 6. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record. Finding: The proposed subdivision will not conflict with existing easements, but rather will expand and provide all necessary easements. 7. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any ofthe following exists: a. Lack of adequate storm water drainage. b. Lack of adequate roads. Chanhassen American Legion Post 580 March 11 Fe!!RIlIf}' 19, 2002 Page 5 c. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. d. Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. Finding:: The proposed subdivision is provided with adequate urban infrastructure. GENERAL SITE PLAN/ARCHITECTURE The proposed American Legion Building with an area of 7,822 square feet will be situated on the northeast corner of the site and parallel to Highway 5. The site is bordered by Highway 5 to the north, Great Plains Boulevard to the west, Citgo Gas Station, strip mall, New Horizon and Lake Drive East to the south. Access to the buildings is proposed from Great Plains Boulevard (right in/out only) and full access from Lake Drive East. Parking will be located along the southern portion of the site. A meandering berm with landscaping, 3 to 4 feet in height, is proposed to be installed along the north center portion of the site to provide screening of the parking lot. The building is located 41 feet from the north, 15 feet from the east, 300 feet from the south, and 60 feet from the west property line. The building contains a significant amount of detail. Materials used on the proposed building consist of rock face block in a three-color blend, and fiber cement siding as the main materials. Asphalt shingles for the roof. Accents are provided through the use of EIFS columns, medallions, and a band that wraps around the entire building (samples will be provided at the meeting). The one issue dealing with the materials relate to color. The accent medallion does not provide any contrast from the columns and the fiber cement siding. Staff discussed changing the color of the medallion and the applicant agreed with staff's suggestion and is willing to make the change. The building meets all the requirements of the design standards, which include: · A defined entrance accentuated by a projecting dormer. · The building provides articulation through the use of dormers on the roof, different materials, landscaping, windows, and columns. · All materials used on the building are durable and permitted. · E.I.F.S is used as an accent and occupies a range of 11 % to 15% of each elevation as permitted by ordinance. · The colors on the building are harmonious. Staff is recommending the accent medallions be changed to a color that provides more contrast. · All elevations that can be viewed by the public have been designed to include windows and/or doors to minimize expanses of blank walls. · The site plan shows a patio located along the northeast corner of the site. Patio furniture will be used in that area. · Trash enclosure and service area are screened from views. Chanhassen American Legion Post 580 March 11 Fe!!rullfj' 19, 2002 Page 6 . No more than 50% of the parking lot faces Highway 5. This parking area is screened by a berm and landscaping. The second building on the site will appear before the City for a site plan application at a later date and is intended to be a clinic (park Nicollet). It is shown on the plans as a concept only. SITE PLAN FINDINGS In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the city shall consider the development's compliance with the following: (1) Consistency with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; (2) Consistency with this division; (3) Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing or developing areas; (4) Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; (5) Creation of functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: a. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; b. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; c. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and d. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. Chanhassen American Legion Post 580 March 11 Fe!!rullfj' 19, 2002 Page 7 (6) Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. Finding: The proposed development is consistent with the City's design requirements; the comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance, and the site plan review requirements. The site design is compatible with the surrounding development. It is functional and harmonious with the approved development for this area. This development falls within the Highway 5 Corridor Overlay District and must comply with the district's design standards in addition to the Neighborhood Business District Park Standards. The purpose of the overlay district is to promote high-quality architectural and site design through improved development standards within the corridor. The design standards should create a unified, harmonious and high quality visual environment. The plan and design of the proposed development meets the intent of the overlay district with the following features: · The building will be one story and the architectural style is unique but will fit in. The building will provide a variation in style through the use of stepped back walls and a variation of durable materials. The pitched roof utilizes a series of dormers. The entrance into the building is pronounced and inviting. · The trees ôn the site are a mixture of significant and insignificant trees in size and quality. Developing the site will result in the loss of most of these trees. The majority of the significant trees are located on the Park Nicollet site. There is an attempt to save a few of them, specifically, along Great Plains Boulevard. Staff will work with the applicant to save additional trees along Great Plains Boulevard. The landscaping plan provides a variety of plant materials that are massed where possible. However, additional plantings will be required. · A parking lot light plan has been submitted. The plan should incorporate the light style and height. Staff is also requiring a more detailed sign plan, which should include lighting method. · The layout of the site as proposed, has merit. The applicant paid equal attention to all elevations of the building. The only elevation that has a larger span of wall is the northeast elevation, however, it is surrounded by spruce trees and the elevation along the east portion of the site, rises rapidly, screening the wall. To protect the views of the neighboring property to the east (Northcott), staff is recommending additional splUce trees be added along the east side of the trash enclosure and delivery area. Chanhassen American Legion Post 580 March 11 February 19,2002 Page 8 . The site plan shows the trash enclosure located at the southeast corner of the Legion building and completely screened from views. The materials match those used on the buildings. Current state statutes require that recycling space be provided for all new buildings. The area of the recycling space must be dedicated at the rate specified in Minnesota State Building Code (MSBC) 1300.4700 Subp. 5. The applicant should demonstrate the required area will be provided in addition to the space required for other solid waste collection space. Recycling space and other solid waste collection space should be contained within the same enclosure. WETLANDS No wetlands exist on site. Storm Water Management The proposed development should be designed to meet the City's water quality and water quantity requirements. The applicant proposes to increases an existing outlet pipe from a 12" to a IS" pipe. Calculations should demonstrate that all downstream facilities are adequate to accommodate storm water from the proposed development. The applicant should demonstrate that the property owners to the east have granted permission for grading to occur on their property and that they have agreed to combine the storm water ponds for both sites. One of the conditions of approval for the site plan of the neighboring property (Northcott) stated, "A drainage easement or other recordable document to secure the use of the pond for the parcel to the west shall be drafted and recorded against the development. " ,"I Ii The amount of riprap proposed may be excessive. The applicant may wish to reduce the amount of riprap below the normal water level. Sheet Cl states that the "Normal High Water Level" for the improved pond is 950.00. It is unclear whether this elevation is the normal water level or the ordinary high water level. Drainage and utility easements should be provided over all storm water ponding areas. Erosion and Sediment Control Silt fence should be provided in areas where sediment may otherwise be carried off-site. Erosion control blanket should be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3: I. All upland areas disturbed as a result of construction activities shall be immediately restored with seed and disc- mulched, covered with a wood-fiber blanket or sodded within two weeks of completion of each activity in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook. Chanhassen American Legion Post 580 March 11 February 19,2002 Page 9 Sutface Water Management Fees Water Quality Fees Because of the impervious surface associated with this development, the water quality fees for this proposed development are based on commercial development rates of $5,909/acre. Based on the proposed developed area of approximately 5.58 acres, the water quality fees associated with this project are $32,972. Water Quantity Fees The SWMP has established a connection charge for the different land uses based on an average citywide rate for the installation of water quantity systems. This cost includes land acquisition, proposed SWMP culverts, open channels, and storm water ponding areas for runoff storage. Commercial developments have a connection charge of $4,360 per developable acre. This results in a water quantity fee of approximately $24,329 for the proposed development. SWMP Credits This project proposes the expansion of a NURP pond in the southeast corner of the site. The applicant will be credited for water quality where NURP basins are provided to treat runoff from the site. This will be determined upon review of the storm water calculations. The applicant may also be credited for oversizing storm water infrastructure in accordance with the SWMP or for the provision of outlet structures. The applicant will not be assessed for areas that are dedicated outlots. No credit will be given for temporary pond areas. At this time, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $57,301. Other Agencies The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Army Corps of Engineers) and comply with their conditions of approval. GRADINGIDRAINAGEIEROSION CONTROL The current plans show a building with a proposed floor elevation of 960.75 on Lot I. The future building on Lot 1 is shown with a proposed pad elevation of 957.00. At these elevations, storm water from the buildings will drain toward each of the proposed catch basins. The parking lot storm drainage will be conveyed via storm sewer to a proposed enlarged storm water pond at the southeasterly corner of the site for treatment prior to discharging to the existing storm sewer system. The applicant should be aware they will be responsible for cleaning the existing storm water pond after enlargements have been completed. The pond is required to be designed to National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) standards. ~. i Chanhassen American Legion Post 580 March 11 Peeruary 19, 2002 Page 10 'i, The applicant has submitted drainage calculations for the site. Staff will work with the applicant's engineer to revise the calculations. Prior to final platting, storm sewer design data will need to be submitted for staff review. The storm sewer will have to be designed for a 10- year, 24-hour storm event. Drainage and utility easements will need to be dedicated on the final plat over the public storm drainage system including ponds, and drainage swales up to the 100- year flood level. The minimum easement width shall be 20 feet wide. Emergency overflows from all stormwater ponds will also be required on the construction plans. Staff recommends that silt fence be added around the storm water pond grading limits of the site. The silt fence must be Type II. All of the proposed rock construction entrances must be lengthened to 75 feet as per City Detail Plate No. 5301. UTILITIES The plans propose extending the sanitary sewer from the existing sanitary manhole at Trunk Highway 5 and water from an existing watermain along the east side of the parcel. The watermain line will be considered a public utility line since it will serve more than one lot. As such, minimum 20-foot wide easements will be required over the public portion of the utility lines. Installation of the private utilities for the site will require permits and inspections through the City's Building Department. The site has been previously assessed for utilities in the amount of $36,866.03. Since the developer will be installing the lateral utility lines, no additional lateral connection fees will be applied. Each newly created lot will be subject to City sanitary sewer and water hook up charges at the time of building permit issuance. The 2002 trunk utility hook up charges are $1,383 per unit for sanitary sewer and $1,802 per unit for water. Public utility improvements will be required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed construction plans and specifications will be required at the time of final platting. The applicant will also be required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies must be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, Department of Health, Watershed District, Carver County, MnDOT, etc. STREETS AND PARKING LOT No public streets are proposed as part of this project. The applicant is proposing full access to the site from Lake Drive East and will utilize another existing right-in/right-out access (south of the parcel) that is shared with Hidden Valley 2nd Addition (Citgo gas station) onto Great Plains Boulevard. The applicant should be aware that they will be responsible for closing off the Chanhassen American Legion Post 580 March 11 February 19,2002 Page 11 existing American Legion (west) access, removing the existing bituminous and extending the curb along Great Plains Boulevard (east side). Also, the two accesses (Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard, through the Citgo Gas Station) shall be connected. This will require the construction of the drive isle located along the south portion of the site concurrently with the construction of the Legion site. At the Planning Commission meeting, the applicant requested that the paved isle from Lake Drive East to Great Plains Boulevard be delayed until the clinic develops their building. The Planning Commission saw merit in the applicant's request. The clinic's plans have not been finalized and may result in the removal of trees that can potentially be saved. Staff has no objections to the location of these accesses. Concrete driveway aprons will be required for the access. As the two accesses will service more than one lot, cross-access easements will need to be obtained and recorded against the lots. At the Planning Commission meeting, the applicant explained that all three parties (Legion, Citgo, and clinic) wish to have the access point at the most southwesterly corner of future Lot 1, Block 1. Staff has no objection to this change. A traffic study was conducted by BRW, Inc. for the Villages on the Pond development which is just west of this site. The study recommended that the Legion site access onto Great Plains Boulevard be limited to a right-in/right-out due to its close proximity to State Trunk Highway 5 and the additional traffic volumes generated by development in this area. Currently, a raised concrete median exists along Great Plains Boulevard down to the current driveway access for the Legion site. A painted median extends from the concrete median down for approximately 85 feet. The raised concrete median starts again, to the intersection of Lake Drive and Great Plains Boulevard. The purpose ofthe median (concrete and painted) is to delineate northbound and southbound traffic and restrict turning movements along Great Plains Boulevard. Under the site plan for Hidden Valley 2nd Addition (site plan for Citgo Station) the right-in/right-out access onto Great Plains Boulevard (old Trunk Highway 101) was approved as an interim exit/entrance with closure required upon the construction of an access along the north property line (the line separating the subject site from the Citgo site) at a future date (see Attachment #2). The intent was to share the access with the Legion site when it developed and minimize the number of curb cuts on Great Plains Boulevard. The location of the existing curb cut at the Citgo Site is acceptable and does not need to be moved. The current location maximizes the distance from Highway 5 which allows for additional stacking distance. The plans have been drawn to facilitate the access from Citgo Station to the new development. The connecting access drive between the two developments as shown on the plans will be constructed to provide continuity for vehicular traffic and pedestrians wishing to utilize services provided by both sites. The main east/west drive aisle is shown at 26 feet wide. The drive aisle shall maintain a minimum turning radius of 30° at the intersection to provide access for emergency vehicles. The driveway access off of Lake Drive is proposed to be shared by the two users. Cross-access and Chanhassen American Legion Post 580 March 11 February 19,2002 Page 12 maintenance agreements will need to be developed and recorded against the parcels to guarantee future ingress and egress to the properties. To minimize traffic congestion on Great Plains Boulevard during development, construction traffic should be limited to Lake Drive East drive aisle. The appropriate traffic control signage will need to be implemented throughout the site in accordance with the Minnesota MUTCD. PARKING The City's parking ordinance for this development requires a design capacity of one stall for each 50 square feet of gross floor area. The total number required is 156 spaces. The applicant used a different method to calculate the parking. They excluded the areas designated for circulation, restrooms, mechanical rooms, etc. from the gross floor area. They also used a separate calculation for the kitchen area (one occupant per 200 square feet of gross floor area which translates to 9 stalls). Following the applicant's calculation, the site requires 120 spaces and the applicant is providing 120. Regardless of which method is used to arrive at an appropriate number, the traffic study conducted by Benshoof & Associates, Inc. concludes that there will be adequate parking. The study collected parking usage information at two comparable sites. Data was collected at the existing American Legion building in Chanhassen and at a Park Nicollet clinic in Maple Grove on Friday, November 30, 2001, from 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. and again from 5 p.m. to 9 p.m. A Friday was chosen because it represents a busier than usual day for the American Legion and a typical day for the clinic. The combined peak demand at I :30 p.m. was 95 spaces. During the evening survey period, the combined peak demand at 6 p.m. was 123 (Park Nicollet will provide 153 parking spaces). Based upon these comparisons, these two uses compliment each other with respect to parking demand because they tend to peak at different times during the day. More parking demand for the clinic during the day, while the American Legion will be busiest in the evenings and on weekends. LANDSCAPING Minimum requirements for landscaping include 3,706 sq. ft. of landscaped area around the parking lot, 15 trees for the parking lot, and buffer yard plantings along Highway 5 and the east property line. The applicant's proposed as compared to the requirements for landscape area and parking lot trees is shown in the following table. Chanhassen American Legion Post 580 March 11 Fe!!flillry 19,2002 Page 13 Vehicular use landsca Treesllandsca Hwy.5 Buffer yard B - 230' R uired 3,706 s . ft. 15 cano trees 2 canopy trees 5 understory trees 5 shrubs 5 canopy trees 10 understory trees 15 shrubs Pro osed 4;OOl- 3,351 s . ft. M 15 cano trees .¡. 3 canopy 4 5 understory >5 shrubs ~ 3 canopy ~ 9 understory G 15 shrubs East property line. Buffer yard A SOT The applicant does not meet minimum requirements for the east buffer yard plantings. Staff recommends that plantings be increased in order to meet minimum requirements as shown in the table. Additionally, according to ordinance, parking lots shall be fully screened from Highway 5. The applicant is proposing to do this through the use of berming and landscaping. The applicant does not meet minimum requirements for landscape area in the parking lot. This can be easily corrected by converting two parking spaces into a landscape island. The plan falls 355 square feet short of the total area required. Currently existing at the southwest corner of the site are a number of significant oak trees. They range in size from 22 to 40 inches in diameter. Staff recommends that the applicant explore all options in an attempt to preserve any of the existing oaks by shifting roadways and/parking areas. The oaks are in good condition and extremely valuable. Preserving them would enhance the development by providing an attractive and interesting focal point at the entrance. LIGHTING Lighting locations have been illustrated on the plans. Only shielded fixtures are allowed and the applicant shall demonstrate that there is no more than \12 foot candles of light at the property line as required by ordinance. A detailed lighting plan should be submitted when building permits are requested. Staff recommends decorative lights not exceed 15 feet in height be used. SIGNAGE In the BN - Neighborhood Business District the following signs are permitted: · Ground low profile business sign defined as "A business sign affixed directly to the ground, with the sign display area standing not greater than two (2) feet above the ground. " ;<:\<- Chanhassen American Legion Post 580 March 11 Feerullf}' 19, 2002 Page 14 The area of the sign may not exceed 24 square feet and 5 feet in height. The sign must maintain a 10 foot setback from property lines. . Wall mounted sign defined as: "A sign attached to or erected against the wall of a building or structure with the exposed face of the sign in a plane approximately parallel to the face of the wall, and which does not project more than twelve (12) inches from such building or structure. Wall signs shall not include product advertising. Wall signs shall include tenant identification, tenant logo, center name, or any combination of the three." Only 1 wall-mounted sign is permitted on the street frontage for each building occupant. The applicant is proposing two wall-mounted signs. One facing Highway 5 and the other at the entrance of the building along the southwest elevation. The sign facing Highway 5 must be removed. The applicant is proposing a monument sign along the north property line, facing Highway 5. This sign will be adequate in advertising the location of the building. 8. Directional sign is defined as: "A sign erected on private property for the purpose of directing pedestrian or vehicular traffic onto or about the property upon which such sign is located, including signs marking entrances and exits. circulation direction, parking areas, and pickup and delivery areas." Staff discussed access to the site and directional signs with the applicant. Staff questions the need for the requested signs. There are two off premise signs. These signs are permitted when access is confusing and in this case, can be justified. They will require City Council approval and we believe they are warranted. There are 7 on premise directional signs. These signs are allowed without a permit with a maximum of 4 per lot. Two of these signs are located on the Legion site, while the other 5 are shown on the future Park Nicollet lot. Staff will examine these signs at the time of site plan application for the clinic. The wall-mounted sign has no dimensions. Staff is recommending the following criteria be adopted: I. Monument signage shall be subject to the monument standards in the sign ordinance. 2. Wall signs are permitted on the southwest elevation only. The sign area shall meet standards set in the sign ordinance. 3. All signs require a separate permit. Chanhassen American Legion Post 580 March 11 Pebmary 19, 2002 Page 15 4. The signage will have consistency throughout the development and add an architectural accent to the building. 5. Consistency in signage shall relate to color, size, materials, and heights. 6. Back-lit individual letter signs are permitted. 7. Individual letters may not exceed 2 feet in height. 8. Only the name and logo of the business occupying the building will be permitted on the sign. The applicant must obtain a sign permit prior to erecting the signs on site. A detailed sign plan incorporating the method of lighting, acceptable to staff should be provided prior to requesting a building permit. . EXISTING BillLDING The applicant wishes to continue using their existing building until the proposed building is completed. They discussed this issue with staff and proposed a 60-day deadline to demolish the building after the Certificate of Occupancy has been issued for the new building. Staff believes . this request is reasonable. The existing building will occupy a separate lot than the future building. Therefore, it will not create a nonconforming situation. PARK AND TRAIL Park and Trail fees shall be paid at the rate in force upon application. The current fees are as follows: Legion Site (Lot 2): At the time of plat: Park Fee: $3,180 Trail Fee: $1,060 At the time of building permit: Park Fee: $6,360 Trail Fee: $2,120 Park Nicollet Site (Lot 1): At the time of plat: Park Fee: $5,310 Trail Fee: $1,770 At the time of building permit: Park Fee: $10,620 Trail Fee: $3,540 , t Ii' Chanhassen American Legion Post 580 March 11 Fe!!RIary 19, 2002 Page 16 " COMPLIANCE TABLE - BN DISTRICT Total Parking Stalls Building Height Building Setback ....1..?1...,º.?.:I...~"f:....m.m. 259' & 430' Corner Lot ....................................................... ........1................ ....................... ........................... ...m........................... ......................... ..m......1..?º.:....____........ ...J..................... 568' ....m_mmm}ª-º.:mm..... m~?~mmmmJmm..?.?~mmm_¡mmmm.....mmm.mm N - 35' S - 0' ! N - 80' S - N/A i N -- S -- E - 15' W - 0' ,E - 15' W - 0' E -- W - -' ........................................._H.........~........................;....... ................................ ........;..................... ......................................H... Per parking study I 120 Chanhassen Legion (7,822 sJ.) l.?,º-ºº~,f:.mm'.m?~'?:I.~ sJ. .....m m.' __ 75' i 214' I Future Park Nicollet Ordinance Total Lot Area Lot Frontage Lot Depth Lot Coverage Parking Setback ................._..........................................4................................................................t............. ............................................H.... ··N~J5~t.9~..i5·;·m1N=4Vt~r.:-3õo;\m·N1.~=t.~fm= E - 15' W - 15' i E - 15' W - 60' i E - -A W - - PLANING COMMISSION UPDATE On February 19,2002, the Planning Commission reviewed and approved this application unanimously. They commended the applicant on their design of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motion: A. SUBDIVISION "The Planning Commission recommends approval of Subdivision 2002-3 for the replat of 5.58 acres into 2 lots, Park Nicollet Addition, as shown on plans dated received January 15,2002, subject to the following conditions: 1. Calculations shall demonstrate that all downstream facilities are adequate to accommodate storm water from the proposed development. Chanhassen American Legion Post 580 March 11 Fe!!mary 19,2002 Page 17 2. The applicant shall demonstrate that the property owners to the east have granted permission for grading to occur on their property and that they have agreed to combine the storm water ponds for both sites. 3. Drainage and utility easements shall be provided over all storm water ponding areas. 4. Silt fence shall be provided in areas where sediment may otherwise be carried off-site. 5. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3: 1. 6. All upland areas disturbed as a result of construction activities shall be immediately restored with seed and disc-mulched, covered with a wood-fiber blanket or sodded within two weeks of completion of each activity in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook. 7. Based on the proposed developed area of approximately 5.58 acres, the water quality fees associated with this project are $32,972; the water quantity fees are approximately $24,329. The applicant will be credited for water quality where NURP basins are provided to treat runoff from the site. This will be determined upon review of the storm water calculations. At this time, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $57,301. 8. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g. Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Army Corps of Engineers) and comply with their conditions of approval. 9. Prior to final plat approval, a professional civil engineer registered in the state of Minnesota must sign all plans. 10. The pond is required to be designed to National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) standards. 11. Cross-access easements for the shared driveway accesses must be obtained and recorded against the lots. 12. Staff will work with the applicant's engineer to revise storm water calculations. Prior to final platting, storm sewer design data will need to be submitted for staff review. The storm sewer will have to be designed for a 10-year, 24-hour storm event. Drainage and utility easements will need to be dedicated on the final plat over the public storm drainage system including ponds, and drainage swales, up to the 100-year flood level. The Chanhassen American Legion Post 580 March 11 Fe!!ruary 19, 2002 Page 18 minimum easement width shall be 20 feet wide. Emergency overflows from all stormwater ponds will also be required on the construction plans. 13. Minimum 20-foot wide easements will be required over the public portion of the utility lines. 14. Each newly created lot will be subject to City sanitary sewer and water hook up charges at the time of building permit issuance. The 2002 trunk utility hook up charges are $1,383 per unit for sanitary sewer and $1,802 per unit for water. 15. Public utility improvements will be required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed construction plans and specifications will be required at the time of final platting. The applicant will also be required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies must be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, Department of Health, Watershed District, Carver County, MnDOT, etc. 16. Park and Trail fees shall be paid at the rate in force upon application. The current fees are as follows: Legion Site (Lot 2): At the time of plat: Park Fee: Trail Fee: At the time of building permit: Park Fee: Trail Fee: Park Nicollet Site (Lot 1): At the time of plat: Park Fee: Trail Fee: At the time of building permit: Park Fee: Trail Fee: $3,180 $1,060 $6,360 $2,120 $5,310 $1,770 $10,620 $3,540 17. The applicant shall enter into a development contract with the city and provide the necessary financial securities as required. 18. Any retaining wall that exceeds 3 feet in height shall be designed by a Registered Engineer. Chanhassen American Legion Post 580 March 11 Fe!!RIary 19, 2002 Page 19 B. SITE PLAN REVIEW "The Planning Commission recommends approval of Site Plan Review 2002-2, for the American Legion Club Post 580 as shown on the site plan received January 15,2002, subject to the following conditions: I. The applicant must obtain a sign permit prior to erecting any signage on site. Provide a detailed sign plan for review and approval. The signage shall meet the following criteria: a. Monument signage shall be subject to the monument standards in the sign ordinance. b. Wall signs are permitted on the southwest elevation only. The sign area shall meet standards set in the sign ordinance. c. All signs require a separate permit. d. The signage will have consistency throughout the development and add an architectural accent to the building. e. Consistency in signage shall relate to color, size, materials, and heights. f. Back-lit individual letter signs are permitted. g. Individual letters may not exceed 2 feet in height. h. Only the name and logo of the business occupying the building will be permitted on the sign. 2. All roof top equipment shall be screened from views. Any kitchen vents shall be concealed or painted the same color as the roof. 3. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the city and provide the necessary financial securities. 4. Fire Marshal conditions: a. Two additional fire hydrants will be required. Contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location of hydrants. b. A 10-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e, street lamps, trees, bushes, shrubs, Qwest, Xcel Energy, cable TV and transformer boxes. This Chanhassen American Legion Post 580 March 11 FeàmllfY 19, 2002 Page 20 is to ensure that the hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. c. When fire protection including fire apparatus access roads and water supplies for fire protection is required to be installed, such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction. Pursuant to 1997 Uniform Fire code Section 901.3. d. Comply with the Chanhassen Fire DepartmentlFire Prevention Division regarding premise identification. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire DepartmentlFire Prevention Division Policy #29-1992. e. Comply with water service installation policy for commercial and industrial buildings. Pursuant to Inspection Division Water Service Installation Policy #34- 1993. Copy enclosed. f. Comply with the Chanhassen Fire DepartmentlFire Prevention Division Policy regarding maximum allowed size of domestic water on a combination domestic/fire sprinkler supply line. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire DepartmentlFire Prevention Division Policy #36-1994. Copy enclosed. g. Comply with the Chanhassen Fire DepartmentlFire Prevention Division policy regarding notes being included on all site plans. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire DepartmentlFire Prevention Division Policy #4-1991. h. "No parking fire lane" signs and yellow curbing will be required. Contact Chanhassen fire Marshal for exact location of signs and curbing to be painted yellow. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire DepartmentlFire Prevention Division Policy #6-1991 and Section 904-1997 Uniform Fire Code. 5. The applicant shall change the color of the accent medallions to a more contrasting color. 6. Concurrent with the building permit, a detailed lighting plan including fixture styles, meeting city standards shall be submitted. 7. Building Official's conditions: a. The building is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system. b. The plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. c. Demolition permits must be obtained form the Inspections Division before demolishing any structures. d. Detailed occupancy related code requirements will be reviewed when complete plans are submitted. It is evident however that the assembly space in the basement must be of one-hour fire-resistive construction and the exits as designed do not comply with the code. e. The proposed building on Lot 1 was not reviewed for building code compliance. Chanhassen American Legion Post 580 March 11 Fe¡rullfj' 19, 2002 Page 21 f. The owner and or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. 8. The applicant shall increase the easterly buffer yard plantings to meet minimum requirements. Spruce trees shall be added to the east of the trash enclosure and the loading area. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted to the City prior to city council approval. All Colorado Blue Spruce trees shall be replaced by Black Hills Spruce or other species as approved by the city. 9. All parking lot landscape islands must have a minimum width of 10 feet. 10. The applicant and/or contractor shall notify the City upon encountering any existing drain tile on the site. The City will determine whether or not the drain tile can be abandoned or relocated. 11. All construction vehicles shall access the site from Lake Drive North and not Great Plains Boulevard. Rock construction entrances shall be installed and maintained until the site is paved with a bituminous surface. Haul routes, if necessary, shall be pre-approved by the City. The applicant will be required to maintain haul routes and clean the streets of any dirt and mud accumulated from vehicles tracking. . Any damage to City streets, curbs or other public facilities will be the responsibility of the applicant. 12. Private utility easements will be required for the storm sewer line that runs from Lot 2 to Lot I. 13. Add the following City of Chanhassen Detail Plate Nos. 1002, 1004, 1006,2101,2109, 2201-2205,3101,3106-3108,5204,5207,5214,5234 and 5300. 14. Prior to final plat approval, a professional civil engineer registered in the state of Minnesota must sign all plans. 15. The pond is required to be designed to National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) standards. 16. Cross-access easements for the shared driveway accesses must be obtained and recorded against the lots. 17. The minimum rock construction entrance must be 75 feet. 18. The applicant must obtain a permit from MnDOT for grading in the right-of-way. Chanhassen American Legion Post 580 March 11 PeBmary 19, 2002 Page 22 19. Staff will work with the applicant's engineer to revise storm water calculations. Prior to final platting, storm sewer design data will need to be submitted for staff review. The storm sewer will have to be designed for a lO-year, 24-hour storm event. Drainage and utility easements will need to be dedicated on the final plat over the public storm drainage system including ponds, and drainage swales, up to the 100-year flood level. The minimum easement width shall be 20 feet wide. Emergency overflows from all stormwater ponds will also be required on the construction plans. 20. A silt fence shall be added around the east side of storm water pond grading limits of the site. The silt fence must be Type n. All of the proposed rock construction entrances must be lengthened to 75 feet as per City Detail Plate No. 5301. The silt fence shall be removed upon completion of the project. 21. Any off-site grading will require easements from the appropriate property owner. 22. Minimum 20-foot wide easements will be required over the public portion of the utility lines. 23. Installation of the private utilities for the site will require permits and inspections through the City's Building Department. 24. Each newly created lot will be subject to City sanitary sewer and water hook up charges at the time of building permit issuance. The 2002 trunk utility hook up charges are $1,383 per unit for sanitary sewer and $1,802 per unit for water. 25. Public utility improvements will be required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed construction plans and specifications will be required at the time of final platting. The applicant will also be required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies must be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, Department of Health, Watershed District, Carver County, MnDOT, etc. 26. On the utility plan: _ Revise catch basin nos. 2, 3, 4, and 7 to catch basin manhole nos. 2, 3,4, and 7. - Revise sheet title to "Preliminary Utility Plan". _ Shift the watermain toward the southeast corner adjacent to the curb and call the fittings. - Show the utilities easement. - Add a storm sewer schedule. - Change the type of public watermain from DIP to PVC C-900. Chanhassen American Legion Post 580 March 11 Fe!!ruary 19, 2002 Page 23 - Show the proposed pipe slope, class and length of the storm sewer. - Under the Sewer and Water Notes, add, "All sanitary services shall be 6" PVC SDR26. 27. On the grading plan: - Show all existing and proposed easements. - Show the benchmark used for the site survey. - Add a note "clean existing pond after pond enlargement grading is finished". - Revise sheet title to "Preliminary Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plan". - Add a note for removing existing bituminous and close off the existing (west) American Legion access. 28. Access onto Great Plains Boulevard from Lot 1, Block 1 shall be restricted to a right- in/right-out only. The connecting access drive between the two developments as shown on the plans should be constructed along te the south property line of the site concurrently with the construction of tile LegieH site phase II. 29. Obtain a liquor license from the City. 30. The existing Legion building shall be removed no later than 60 days after receipt of the Certificate of Occupancy for the new building. 31. ..^& sic:te'.valk BRall be iRHaåHceå tkreüge tHe LegiaR's parlcJag lot. Tke sidewalk shall rNfl floFta/s81:lt};¡ aRå eSSReet tfle l3ailåiag ·;:itli the side~.·:a]]( SA Lah.e Dri\'e Bast. The applicant will work with staff to explore the possibility of having a tree island on the property line as well as placement options for a sidewalk. 32. The applicant shall work with staff to minimize impact and save the significant stand same of the trees located aJeng Great PlaiHs Beuleyllfè in the southwest corner of the site until future plans are developed. 33. Park and Trail fees shall be paid at the rate in force upon application. The current fees are as follows: Legion Site (Lot 2): At the time of plat: Park Fee: Trail Fee: At the time of building permit: Park Fee: Trail Fee: $3,180 $1,060 $6,360 $2,120 Park Nicollet Site (Lot 1): At the time of plat: Park Fee: Trail Fee: At the time of building permit: Park Fee: $5,310 $1,770 $10,620 i- t Chanhassen American Legion Post 580 March 11 Fe!!Riary 19, 2002 Page 24 34. The applicant shall be responsible for closing off the existing Citgo Gas Station (west) access, removing the existing bituminous, extending the curb along Great Plains Boulevard (east side) and extending the median located across from the existing Legion curb cut to eliminate left turns. 35. Recycling space shall be provided for all new buildings. The area of the recycling space must be dedicated at the rate specified in Minnesota State Building Code (MSBC) 1300.4700 Subp. 5. The applicant should demonstrate the required area will be provided in addition to the space required for other solid waste collection space. Recycling space and other solid waste collection space should be contained within the same enclosure. " ATTACHMENTS I. Copy of condition "U" of the Northcott site plan agreement pertaining to shared use and expansion of the pond. 2. Letter dated September 19, 1994, and City Council minutes discussing Citgo Gas Station with conditions of approval dated June 2, 1986. 3. Memo from Todd Hoffman, dated January 30, 2002. 4. Memo from Mark Littfin dated February 6, 2002. 5. Memo from Steve Torell, Building Official, dated February 1, 2002. 6. Memo from Mahmoud Sweidan, dated February 5, 2002. 7. Traffic Study prepared by Benshoof and Associates. 8. Notice of Public Hearing. 9. Application. 10. Planning Commission minutes dated February 19, 2002. 11. Plans dated received JBRliar/ 15 March 4, 2002. g:\plan\sa\Jegion site spr.doc CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION FEBRUARY 11, 2002 Mayor Jansen caUed the meeting to order at 5:45 p.m. COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Jansen, Councilman Boyle, Councilman Labatt and Councilman Peterson COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: Councilman Ayotte STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt and Kate Aanenson A. STRATEGIC PLAN - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. Todd Gerhardt discussed what staff has been doing related to economic development in the city. Meeting with the Chamber of Commerce, there were discussions of starting a farmers market and where would be the best location. Creating a coupon book for the PGA tournament with ads and coupons from local businesses. And last, the Chamber discussed creating a map showing how to get to Chanhassen from the airport with ads from local businesses. Todd Gerhardt stated that the Chamber of Commerce is starting to take a more active role in marketing Chanhassen. The council discussed various locations for the fanners market. Staff showed a map of downtown Chanhassen and what sites were owned by the city and what the vision was for those sites. There was discussion about the need for a "sit down" restaurant in town. Mayor Jansen asked if the city was positioned to meet the demand when the time comes. Kate Aanenson showed different sites where restaurants could be accommodated. There was discussion over the old Pauly-Pony-Pryzmus site and the consensus of the council was to keep that site commercial with the possibility of putting a restaurant there. Mayor Jansen stated that Todd Gerhardt should continue to be the liaison between the Chamber to Commerce and the City Council. Councilman Boyle volunteered to be the back-up if Todd Gerhardt couldn't make a meeting. The second strategy was discussion of the vacant industrial land in town. Todd Gerhardt went over a map showing where all the vacant parcels were. Mayor Jansen asked how the city could help stimulate growth of those parcels. Councilman Peterson said he believed the landowners were marketing most of the sites pretty aggressively themselves. Mayor Jansen summed up what had been discussed. The City Council supports the Chamber of Commerce and the direction they're going. Keeping track of the progress on the bowling alley site. To keep the Pauly-Pony-Pryzmus site commercial and try to market the site for a sit down restaurant. Mayor Jansen then asked staff to prepare a rendering of what the city envisions development could look like on that corner. Councilman Peterson asked if the Vision 2002 discussion could be continued at a later work session. Mayor Jansen adjourned the work session meeting at 6:55 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim ...'''¡.; N orl-hc.ot~ behind the existing sidewalk along Lake Drive East. o. The storm pond shall be revised to take into account future expansion to the west. The pond slopes shall be 3 to I with a 10 to 1 slope for the first one foot depth of water or 4 to 1 side slopes overall. p. The applicant and/or contractor shall notify the city upon encountering any existing drain tile on the site. The city will determine whether or not the drain tile can be abandoned or relocated. q. All construction vehicles shall access the site from the westerly entrance off Lake Drive East. Rock construction entrances shall be installed and maintained until the site is paved with a bituminous surface. Parking along Lake Drive East shall be prohibited. Haul routes, if necessary, shall be pre-approved by the city. The applicant will be required to maintain haul routes and clean the streets of any dirt and mud accumulated from vehicles tracking. Any r. damage to city streets, curbs or other public facilities will be the responsibility of the applicant. s. The applicant's civil engineer shall provide detailed storm sewer and ponding calculations for 10-year and 100-year storm events for the City Engineer to review and approve prior to issuance of a building permit. The applicant shall provide detailed pre-developed and post-developed storm water calculations for 100-year storm events and normal water level and high water level calculations for the proposed pond. Individual storm sewer calculations between each catch basin segment will also be required to determine if sufficient catch basins are being utilized. t. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies, i.e. Watershed District, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, Health Department, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and Minnesota Department of Transportation and comply with their conditions of approval. ~u. A drainage easement or other recordable document to secure the use of the pond for the parcel to the west shall be drafted and recorded against the development. v. A future internal driveway access from this site to the parcel to the west may be required with the next phase or expansion of the parking lot depending on compatible land uses of the parcels. Such access may be subject to reasonable restrictions so that the joint access does not materially interfere with the use and enjoyment on either parcel. This access will not be required if the adjoining land use is a car wash or facility with gas pumps or other use which may cause vehicular congestion. The access is specifically not provided to facilitate cross parking. Both properties must meet all zoning and use parking requirements on their respective parcels without benefit of such cross access. Cross-access and maintenance agreements will need to be developed and recorded against the parcels to guarantee ingress and egress to the properties. 4 . . , . J '-' ~b,1 ~ 'db'J. C.l CITYbF CBAHBASSEN . -, 690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147. CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 . FAX (612) 937-5739 September 19, 1994 Tom Lander Mortenson Corporation P.O. Box 710 Minneapolis, MN 55440 Dear Mr. Lander: f Pursuant to our conservation last week, I reviewed the site plan and conditional use pennit for {. " . the "Blue Circle Association" or Hidden ValIi2n\AdditiOn. One of the conditions of approval of this deyelopmeút was that the access to the commercial center from Highway 101 be eliminated when the Ari1erican Legion site develops (see attached minutes dated June 2, 1986). TI!i access to ð1e existing commercial center will then be from Highway 101 just to the nortb~.¥f the access~, the Legion property. The possibility of the Mortenson pr~ gainingacces{lrom the Legion property, via this access from Highway 101, is deperident upon the type ofÖevelopment that occurs on the ... ~,. properties. Staff would recollllJ\ed access between the I.e,gion site and the Mortenson property if both parcels were 'developed with similar or compatible type uses. ".'.. h. ...-"'>.-" \-! IT you have any qúcstions regardiñglhis:mauct;pleast'fcèlfrèe to contact me. ~·~"'·-'\""'h."':'='''''''·'~''''~~,I'.!'-~--î~~!IO ';.~';"'<;';;J;,.~''=-;./-;.''''~'_.T-hi:'tJl'_.-:~.",;;.._'I¡''þ "'.. ~"S~-~...~t!Þ ~~ .,¿¡¿;~~,.,,"";"'-~ .. ... ~...,.".,..,",~ fÞ ~. ~~",. . /I. , A. fI/7'v. . '~~t':·.'I. ,71"\.w.;·~¡;;;",,!i""> . ,"-t/ tV-..JlJ , \ ',:: t,....~;.,...,_·· :s: , ~~. Kathryn R. Aanenson, AICP '~ f ~anningD~tor ~'J Sincerely, XciÜ , KRA:k Attachment: City Council Minutes dated lune 2, 1986 ..... i 1~ ~ì ~ ,01 {1 .~ :t f~ -0 -" .. " J~ -a . i'-- \ Wi-)' . . ¿ . . -:tA "''' - . f- _r iA Vi CI .., q- .(,. ,..: r ~ 'J - r -' w -J - - '7- ~1 ., ;: .j , , .; ( I ¡, ' ~ "" ~ .. .. CI r . . . . c , , c · c · · · "~. ~. I ~t( ~ e 3 '" .. ---~J I~L R. . s , ,¡ ., !~I I' _(\..11. ~ "J-,: ~ . l. I; :1" i !~~ (jM~ .1 " ;/j ~ 9'1 ,Ioe .~ ~ '-'.~ ..J- "" . \) City Council Meeting": June 2, 1986 ) 9& " J (l {}. P retained by whomever's property they happen to be on, but we don't see how the City can place that into a condition form. I am recommending that 5 be made concerning the requirement for an easement for driveway purposes across Lot 4 be executed ard granted to Hr. Hughes. Councilwoman Watson: When there are only six lots. I don't see any reason why we have to see just the average lot size lUX! mecUan lot size. I think we could have gotten the six lot sizes. Dacy: The lot sizes are the plat too. Mayor Hamilton: Have any trouble with that condition 5 TcIm? Tom Klingelhutz: No, no problem at all. I think it would be foolish to make him move his driveway Wen the lot is so large anyhow. Dave Hughes: I live on the east side of the property line lUX! I acknowledge the Council is not setting legal property lines. I am appreciative Hr. Honk's willingness to enter that -oement and Hr. Klingelhutz's willingness to go along with it for my driveway and I ~id special note to his comment that he wouldn't bulldozed those trees subject to finding just whose trees they are. Councilwoman Swenson moved, Councilwoman Watson seconded to approve the l Final Plan Amendment Request '83-1 for platting six single family lots in OUtlot D as presented on the plans stamped "Received April 24, 1986" ard subject to the following conditions: 1. Creation of a 1Ø foot landscaped. strip along the two lots abutting Lake Lucy Road. 2. Shorten the cul-de-sac ten feet. 3. All construction meet urban design standams for utilities. 4. Site grading be required to route runoff away from the already developed property to the east. 5. An easement be granted across Lot 4 for driveway purposes for the adjoining property. All voted in favor and motion carried. .. Blue;J:W:l.e.Assocl.aton,,»ortheast~;Qõrner~.Õf~iÌiqftWãYi1Ø1:¡ii!~·t.ãkè;Dtiyt¡. F.òt!II";t:" ...__....:..... _ ___ Preliminary ~ ~est ~ Subdivide .!::2! Acres ~ ~ Comnerclal Lots 0 1.35 Acres and .58 Acres. --- -- . b. ';Condi tional:~ 'Pè?iñÎ t ~'7t. for Gà'šõilne ::tåles !:!!!Property. ZOhed'·~t.~rcial. . .. '- a. !=: 42 . """ , . .~..~.. ;..ff;·Þ~""~:'· .j> :-".. I,";:' '. j;~:~ <....J~).(,~I ;"'::!)"~'~" ..!'..-;,':; ;.. '.~:,. -_ r"# ... ...: '1:."",.... ....-. :;. '. '" .... . .,:;1;. -ëi . ûñèi1.'·'MBetiDg~· ~ a( ·1986 . ,. : .. .~.~~~ ': :.". ~. ': ...':. ~'.~~7;..... ';.' '.. ' . it' , .~ ) .0',:' '.- ........... ..... . .. . . ", ~ I .!!!:!. !!!!!. aeview for Commercial !!!!!.!!!!..!:!! Acres ~ Property ZOned ~ eœmerërar. Dacy: I will quickly run through this request. The plat request is to divide the parcel into two lots so the free stancUng build on'the eastern portion of the lot can be conveyed to separate ownership. O:mdition of plat approval that the two lots file a=oss --«It .cc-e agreement between the two lots so that those lots can only be used as proposed from Lake Drive East:. As you recall, the lot was platted in conjunct:1cn with the HidCIen valley Estates plan arII5 you will recall that Lake EAJcy is going to connect eventually down to Dakota. It was a cordition of approval along the south side of Lake Drive East that there be a 6-B foot berm along this area. 'l'his outlot am the outlot to the east of the American rsgion Property was zoned to 0-2 at the time of the HidCIen Valley Plat approval. So the applicant's site plan requires two approvals by City Q)unci1. One is a Conditional USe Permit for the sale of gasoline. Two is the site plan review for the commercial use itself. Retail uses are permitted uses in the 0-2 Clistric:t so the conditional use only pertains to ~ sale of gasoline. The site plan for detetmining the location of the pumps does meet the setback requirements for the 0-2 Clistric:t. Of concern may be the gas pump sigMge that is proposed. I think most of you will recall that earlier request of the Holiday station and at the Lincoln Properties bas prohibited any type of gas pump can't be sigMged. However, if it is considered by COuncil as recommended that the signage only be located on the north and west side and not the south and east to only promote the ability to see the signs from that direction and not from the neighborhood. As far as the pumps are concerned, the Fire Marshall was consulted and he is recommending conditions of approval. As far as the site plan is concerned, we have noted 12 conditions that woulc1 be made a part of approval. What I would like to do is briefly go through those so we know wœtStaff is r~mDi~. ~ 1. As far as signage is concerned, there will be one pylon sign on the west side of the site. It is also bei~ recommended that along the south side, along with a basis of signage in and around the profile sign rather than a pylon sign to give it a Clifferent character. 2. Mditional landscaping in the northwest corner of the site. fbwever,at this time Staff wants to withdraw that condition because of the issue that is raise(! with the access from '1'H lØ1. . What is being proposed .is a one-way in or one-way out from '1'H lØl into the site. HnDot bas come back and said that in the future when the American Legion property develops to t.'1e north, that this access will be closed arII5 a new access be built along t::-. north lot line and that the traffic design of this site be reoriented tc :he north to access into the Clriveway. 'D1us is condition 12 that the City· Ð1gineer added at the time of Planning Catmission approval. . 3. Is to Clirec:t on-site catch basins and not to L'lke Drive East. 4. 'Ibat the access island on Lake Drive East be lengthened lØ feet to the north to assist with traffic channelization. 'l'his will alter the turning movements of cars entering the site and also coming out of the site. We 43 r ;10 ( J City Council Meeting - June 2, 1986 propose two lanes as you exit the site for a right hancJ turn ancS left hand turn. s. R:!quires that lanes in here be clearly stripec!. 6. That the developer acquire the HnDot permit ancS comply with aU of its conditions. . 7. '!he standard condition requiring all bituminous areas shall be lined with concrete ancS curbs. S. '!bat the root-top equipment be screened as shown on the plan dated April 24, 1986. 9. Installation of landscaping. Ie. aafers to an installation of a fire hydrant along Lake Dri ve Fast. This is to insure PJ:Oper water supply for fire protection services. 11. Ole of the parking spaces along the front of the shopping center be at least locatEd to provide for fire lane. Fire lane access and the elimination of one parking space will not affect parking requirements. The Planning Commission recommendEd approval on the plat, conditional [ use permit and the site plan approval with the 12 conditions as presented. Pat Hallasee: I guess I have nothing to add other than the fact that we have workEd very closely with the Staff in deVeloping our plan and feel the recommendations they have added are very wise and are consistent with gocXl planning and we intend to follow those rec:anuendations. Mayor Hamil ton: I think I saw that you are planning on putting in a Q-Superette in there. Pat Hallasee: That is correct. Mayor Hamilton: Don't they generally sell 3.2 beer. Pat Hallasee: 3.2 beer, yes. Mayor Hamilton: Personally I have a problem with that. I would r::1!(e that a condition that a 3.2 beer license not be allowed at the o-Super. .'':e. Pat Hallasee: I think that would be a substantial problem. Councilwoman Watson: Why. Mayor Hamil ton: We would just have so many problems,. we've had problems I with other facilities in the City and I work continually with the Carver ~ County POlice department and that seems to be a major Source of minors ~ purchasing alcoholic beverages is buying through a Q-Superette or that type 44 / ¿It \ .',--~ t' ) 01"'71· ~ ó.. , City Council Meeting - June 2, 1986 of establishment, whether it is a Tom '1bumb or whatever types sell it:. '!'hat is a major problem. We've hIIc1 those problems in this colllllunity before and it is an important problem that we have a hard time clealing with because 1'Qu can't have someone sitting down there all the time. You often times have 16 year Qlds working in those type of facility and they are selling to other 16 yèar olds. Police departments tend not to patrol those type of fac:ili ties simply because it is a 3.2 and 1'011 can't get drunk on 3.2. Dacy: '!he only comment I was asking for clarification was, is that the liquor license is not a zoning issue pertaining to this application. Mayor Hamilton: I brought it up because I want the applicant to know that is an issue. A discussion followed on what other facilities such as Holiday, SUper American and Kenny's sold 3.2 beer. It was established that Super America and Kenny's did. fbliday does not, trying to decide if a precedent has been established with respect to issuing of liquor licenses to these type of facilities, a gas station facility with a store attacbœnt. Don Ashworth: Council has great discretion in terms of liquor licenses. You have issued a license to SA and have not issued one, nor have they applied for one, to Holiday. Pat Hallasee: I think it is an issue that's of some fairly major importance though. I'm not going to say it is a real major factor in Q's business, I know it is an important part of their business and I've never really specifically questiOned the gentlemen about whether he would go forward on this site or not without it, but I do know they are in competition not only with Holiday but with Kenny's market also and they would certainly be at a competitive disadvantage if they were not allowed to canpete on the same basis as Kenny's. Councilman Geving moved, Councilwoman Watson seconded approval of Subdivision Request 86-12 as depicted on the plat stamped "Received April 24, 1986" and subject to an easement across Lot 1 being recorded in conjunction with filing the plat to insure permanent access for Lot 2. All voted in favor and motion carried. Mayor Hamilton moved, Councilwoman Watson seconded approval of Conditional Use ~it Request '86-2 for installation of gasoline pumps as dep~::ted on the Slte Plan stamped "Received April 24, 1986" subject to the fo: ~Jwing conditions: 1. Gasoline tank storage shall be in compliance with the uniform Fire Code and a petmit must be obtained fran the State Fire Marshal. 2. Gas pump canopy signage shall only be located along the north and west facia of the canopy. . 3. Approval of site Plan Request '86-1. 45 ,/~ fj þ City Council Meeting - June 2, 1986 " Councilwoman Swenson: Is it anticipated that there will be any automobile repair or maintenance on this site? Pat Hallasee: ti), it is strictly gas sales, self service gaSoline and convenience fOO3. Dacy: ~ canopy signage would be part of this request. Councilwoman Swenson: I looked diligently through here I thought and I could find no copy of what they wanted to put on this sign. Is there a copy of what the signage on the canopy was going to look like. I know we were very specific with Holiday that they couldn't put anything on this sigr1- 7be signage would have to be restricœa to the name of the station. Dacy: '!he nine foot square sign, that is the 0 sign, the other one lists prices. Councilwoman Swenson: Ch no. You can't have it up there because if you have it up there. You can put the MIlle of the establishment but: no the gas prices. We went through this with Holiday. '!bat is a main comer there. 7bey want rotating pylons. Dacy: N:J, they UD:'Jerstand that it is not to be rotating. '!bat is prohibited by otdinance. Councilman Hom: What is the difference if the prices is on the canopy or on another sign. Councilwoman Swenson: I think it can be pretty "icky" looking especially as you are entering the City. If our whole policy is going to change than I think we should establish it before everyone else is going to be wanting signs all over the marquees. Do I understand that the area that is going to be facing '1'H 5, the north lot line is the rear of the shopping center or are we talking about sanething else. Dacy: Yes, the north side is the rear. Councilwanan SWenso';1: 7be P\IIIPS are going to be facing take Drive East? Dacy: Yes, at the corner of take Drive East and '1H 1Ø1. Councilwoman Swenson: What provisions are being made for the arch'';ec:tural appearance on the north side of the building. I, Pat Hallasee: It is all brick. The building will be brick all four sides. Councilwoman SWenson: M1ere do you intend to have trash containers? Pat Hallasee: We have indicated two positions on the 'Site Plan. We understand the trash containers will be screened. We. would want to do that an}'Way. ~ 46 :.;.:;~:~ ,. aty 0-,11 _~~ >- 2, -I ,-. 1986 . Councilwoman SWEl1SOn: lbw we are baving two signs. We're baving a pylon on the northeast side am another one on take Drive East. Yes, the sign ordinance provides that you can bave one sign for every street frontage so as a comer lot they are allowed two signs. Councilwoman Watson: What does the pylon say as opposeð to what the canopy says? Dacy: '1he detail on what the sign say was not suhuittea. '!bey will apply for a sign permit am they bave to meet the location and the size requirements as stipulatea by the sign ordinance. We require them to show the location on the site plan so the Council is aware that there is going to be a sign on the partic:ular site. . Councilwoman Swenson: We approve the signs then. Council approves the signs? Dacy: . H), it is processed administratively. '!be gas pump canopy signage is included in the conditional usage permit approval however, the free standing pylon signs are administratively approvecfbec:ause that is what the sign ordinance provides. If they meet the standatds of the sign ordinance on the free standing signs, they file an application and Staff processes the penuit. Councilwoman Swenson: I noticed in the Planning Commission Minutes, according to you, one of the conditions for approval was that there was to be no gas canopy signage. Q' page '1birty <he of May 14, 1986 Minutes. Okay the one on Lake Drive East is going to be the neighborhood type, the groum profile and the one on '1'H 5 is eight feet tall. I believe that Is wbat I read. Dacy: Q' '1'H s. H). Councilman Geving: You are down to nœnber 9. Councilwoman Swenson: On the back here it says rotating it says it Is going to 6 feet side and 8 feet high on a 12 foot POSt. Which Is the same size as McDonalds. Dacy: 2Ø feet is the maximum. .'!be Planning Commission did approve the Conditional Use Permit as presentEd in the Staff Report. 48 square feet. '!be maximum for a commercial sign is 8Ø &quare feet so they are umerneath that requirement. All voted in favor except Councilwoman Swenson who opposed. Motion carried. . Councilman Horn moved, Councilman Geving seconded approval of Site PIaIf' Review Request '86-1: as depicted on the site plan stamped "Received April 24, 1986" and subject to the fOllowing COnditions: 1. The free-standing sign along Lake Drive East shall be a ground profile sign. """".11'.:) ", ~'.. ,,,ì j ! i , n "- I -..~ /~ eU ) ."" City Council Meeting - June 2, 1986 2. All site drainage be directed to on-site catch basins and not to Lake Drive East. 3. '!be access islane! on Lake Drive East be lengthened 19 feet to the north to assist with traffic channelization. 4. '!be exit lines to take Drive East be clearly signed and striped to designate proper turning and directional movements. A detailed plan be su!xnitted with the building permit denoting signage and strip:tge of the access areas. S. '!be developer acquire a permit from HnDot for the 'Df 191 ac:œss and adhere to all conditions of said permit including maintaining ditch drainage. 6. All bituminous areas shall be lined with concrete curb, including the islands at both access points. 7. Roof-top equipment and trash enclosures shall be screened as depicted on tell plan s~ "Received April 24, 1986". 8. Installation of landscaping as depicted on the plan stamped "Received April 24, 1986". 9. An additional fire hydrant will be located on Lake Drive East. this will insure proper water supply and availability for fire aparatus. L 19. r ~ ~) J.~':lrJ -~1r Fire lane access will be provided in the front of the bUilding. The specific location to be determined after final building plans are subnitted. 'lbe 'Df 191 access is approved as an interim entrance/exit with closures require upon the construction of an access along the north property line at a future date. SUch closure shall be required only upon the legal right of Lot 1, Hidden Valley 2m Addition to use said access. Also, site plan revisions to allow for this access shift shall be approved by the City to insure ' property vehicular DIOVBDents; " All voted in favor and motion carried. Dacy: Mr. Mayor I just noticed that on the plat request, the ager.:'.! should have read preliminary and final plat. They have submitted both. As a matter of fact, the plat in your p:tcket is a final plat. For the record could you entertain a motion. Mayor Hamilton amended his motion and Councilman Geving-seconded to amend the Preliminary Plat Request to subdivide 1.93 Acres into Two Commercial Lots of 1.35 Acres and .58 Acres to include Preliminary and Final Plat approval. b CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 City Center Drive PO Box 147 Chonhoßen, MinneJoto 55317 Phone 952.937.1900 General FIlX 952937.5739 ¡Engineering Deportment FIlX 952.937.9152 Building Deparnnent FIlX 952.934.2524 \ríb Site www.ci.chonhassen.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Sharmeen Al-Jaff Todd Hoffman, Park & Recreation Director -tJ.i January 30, 2002 FROM: DATE: SUBJ: Park Nicollet 1st Addition, American Legion Post #580 I have reviewed Planning Case 2002-3 Subdivision and 2002-2 Site Plan for the American Legion Post #580 project. The only applicable Park and Recreation Department condition of approval is the payment of park and trail dedication fees. The 1st Addition of 92,246 sq. feet will be required to pay the following park and trail fees: At the time of plat: Park Fee: $3,180 Trail Fee: $1,060 At the time of building permit: Park Fee: $6,360 Trail Fee: $2120 r:~. _rr'-___'._u__ A __...;.._ ___........;... ...:.f. _,._.. 1_1'M ~"A/;'" __1._....1. _ _I.__..;..~ )_.....~_..... ../...:..:.._1....:_.___. ...J f.._...:f..l ......1.. ,,_.... ../........ I:... ......1. ...J ./... CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 City Gmter Drive PO Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Phone 952,9311900 General Fax 952,937.5739 Eng¡'"ering Departnzent Fax 952.937.9152 Building Department Fax 952,934.2524 If<bSite www.á.chanhassen.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Shannin AI-Jaff, Senior Planner FROM: Mark Littfin, Fire Marshal DATE: February 6, 2002 SUBJECT: Request for a subdivision of 5.584 acres into two lots and a site plan review with variances for the construction of an 8,617 square foot building located at the southeast comer of the intersection of Hwy 5 and Great Plains Blvd, Park Nicollet I ~ Addition, American Legion Post 580. Planning Case: 2002-3 Subdivision and 2002-2 Site Plan, I have reviewed the site plan for the above project. In order to comply with the Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division, I have the following fire code or city ordinance/policy requirements. The site plan is based on the available infonnation submitted at this time. If additional plans or changes are submitted the appropriate code or policy items will be addressed. I. Two additional fire hydrants will be required. Contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location of hydrants. 2. A 1 O-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e, street lamps, trees, bushes, shrubs, Qwest, Xcel Energy, cable TV and transfonner boxes. This is to ensure that the hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. 3, When fire protection including fire apparatus access roads and water supplies for fire protection is required to be installed, such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction. Pursuant to ] 997 Unifonn Fire code Section 901.3. 4. Comply with the Chanhassen Fire DepartmentlFire Prevention Division regarding premise identification. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division Policy #29-1992. 5, Comply with water service installation policy for commercial and industrial buildings, Pursuant to Inspection Division Water Service Installation Policy #34-1993. Copy enclosed. The City of Chanhas"n, A li'owin~ community with cltan lakes, quality schooh. a charmin¡ downwwn, thrivint businesses, and beautifù! parks, A fTCat place to live, work, and Pit. Shannin Al-Jaff February 6, 2002 Page 2 6. Comply with the Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division Policy regarding maximum allowed size of domestic water on a combination domestic/fire sprinkler supply line. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division Policy #36-1994. Copy enclosed. 7. Comply with the Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division policy regarding notes being included on all site plans. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division Policy #4-1991. 8. "No parking fire lane" signs and yellow curbing will be required. Contact Chanhassen fire Marshal for exact locatión of signs and curbing to be painted yellow. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division Policy #6-1991 and Section 904-1997 Unifonn Fire Code. ML/be g:lsafetylmllplrev02-3 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 City Cmttr Drillt, PO Box 147 CiJJJnhassm. MinntSOt4 55317 PhoI1l612.937.1900 Gmtrtd Fax 612.937.5739 fnginwing Fax 612.937.9152 Public Saftty Fax 612.934.2524 IITb www.d.chanhassm.mn.us CHANHASSEN FJRF. nEPARTMRNT POJ.JCV PREMISES mENTJFJCA TJON ~pnp.nll Numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Said numbers shall contrast with their background. Size and location of numbers shall be approved by one of the following - Fire Marshal, Fire Inspector, Building Official, Building Inspector. Requirements are for new construction and existing buildings where no address numbers are posted. Othpr Rpqllirpmpntc _ r...nprsIIl 1. Numbers shall be a contrasting color from the background. 2. Numbers shall not be in script. 3. If a structure is not visible from the street. additional numbers are required at the driveway entrance. Size and location must be approved. 4. Numbers on mail box at driveway entrance roB)' be 8 minimum of 4". However, requirement #3 must still bernd. 5. Administrative authority may require additional numbers if deemed necessary. RPli:irlrnfi!11 Rpqllirpmpnfc p nr I..u d",plllng unit' J. Minimum height shall be 5 inches. 2. Building permits will not be finaled unless numbers are posted and approved by the Building Department. C'nmmprrilll R"qllirrml'ntc 1. Minimum height shall be 12". 2. Multi·Tenant Buildings a. Building address range, minimum height of 12 inches. b. Address numbers required on all tenant doors. Minimum height of 6 inches. 3. If address numbers are located on a directory entry sign, additional numbers will be required on the buildings main entrance. 4. Signage on overhead! delivery doors will also be required. Chanhassen Fire Department Fire Prevention Policy #29-1992 Date: 06/15/92 Revised: 4/12/00 Page I of I A!1:4J.~ · . CITY OF CHANHASSEN ,90 City Onttr Drivt. PO &x 147 Chanh4ssm, MjnntSotll55317 PhoIll612.937.1900 G",tral FII% 612.937.5739 Enginmjng FII% 611937.9152 Public Saftty FII% 612.934.2524 Wib www.ci.chanhassmmn.us WATER SERVICE INSTALLATION POLICY FOR COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS I) The Inspections Division shall be responsible for issuance of permits No permit shall be issued until approval of plans have been obtained from the following: a) Engineering Department b) Fire Marshal c) Minnesota Department of Health d) Plumbing Inspector 2) Mechanical inspectors will do all installation inspections and witness the hydrostatic and conductivity tests. Call 937-1900 ext. 31 to schedule an inspection. Inspection and TestRequirements a) All pipes shall be inspected before being covered. Phone 937-1900, ext. 31, to schedule inspections. A 24 hour notice is required. b) Conductivity test is required. The pipe shall be subjected to minimum 350 amp test for a period of not less than 5 minutes. c) Hydrostatic test required. All pipe shall be subjected to a hydrostatic pressure of 150 PSI for 2 hours. Allowable pressure drop shall not exceed 1 PSI. d) Pipe shall not be run under buildings - NFP A 24, 8-3.1. Inspections Division Water Service Installation Policy #34-1993 Date: 04/15/93 Revised: 4117/96 Pagé 1 óf.i2/ .. , . ¿ 3) Upon approval of the hydro test, the plumbing inspector shall submit a copy of the inspection report to the utility superintendent The inspection report shall note whether the system is ready for main flush and drawing of water sample for the bug test. 4 ) Water main flushing shall be witnessed by the utility superintendent. a) Watermain flushing may be scheduled by contacting the utility superintendent at 474-2086. A 24 hour notice is required. b) The utility superintendent shaI1 obtain a water sample for a bacteria test after the main flush and deliver to a testing company. The contractor shall be responsible for testing costs. Allow two weeks for testing results to be returned to the City. c) Upon receiving approval of the water sample test, the utility superintendent shall submit a copy to each plumbing inspector and turn water on to the tested and approved sections of the piping. 5) An additional supervised flush and flow test will be required and witnessed by the Fire Marshal for services supplying fire suppression systems. The flush and flow test shall be performed in accordance with 1991 edition ofNFP A 13, Sec. 8-2.1. Contact the Chanhassen Fire Marshal at 937-1900 ext. 132. 6) Watermain installations shall comply with: a) Minnesota Plumbing Code, Chapter 4715 b) Chanhassen Engineering Department, Watermain Specifications c) National Fire Protection Association, Chapter 24 7) Only authorized city employees are permitted to operate city water control valves. For water turn on or off contact the utility superintendent by phone 474-2086. A 24 hour notice is required. ~Æ~ proved- Building 0 Clal Inspections Division Water Service Installation Policy #34-1993 Date: 04/15/93 Revised: 04/17/96 Page 2 of2 1t~ Approv d Marshal CITY OF CHANHASSEN p90 City Cmttr Drive. PO &x 147 i ChanhllJtn, MinneIolil55317 Phont 612.937.1900 Gtnmd Fox 612.937.5739 ¡ Enginming Fox 612.937.9152 i Publit Saftty Fox 612.934.2524 i mb www.ci.cll4nhllJtn.mn.us CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICY MAXIMUM ALLOWED SIZE OF DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ON A COMBINATION DOMESTICIFIRE SPRINKLER SUPPLY LINE 1. Domestic water line shall not be greater than Y. pipe size of the combination service water supply line. 2. 1 \1.," domestic off 6" line. 3. 2" domestic off 8" line. 4. 2 Y:z domestic off 10" line. Option I: Domestic sizes may be increased if it can be calculated hydraulically that the demand by all domestic fixtures will not drop the fire sprinkler water below its minimum gallonage required. Option 2: Combination domestic and fire line service shall have an electric solenoid valve installed on the domestic side of the service. This valve shall be normally powered open and close on loss of electric power or signatftom the system wat~r flow indicator. Must be approved by the Chanhassen Fire Marshal and Chanhassen Mechanical Inspector. 24f~ Approved- BUl ding Official Chanhassen Fire Department Water Line Sizing Policy #36-1994 Date: 06/10/94 Revised: 11/24/99 Page ~ 1 }iiif-~ i. (: , CITY OF CHANHASSEN øo OtyCmttr DriIIt. PO Box 147 C1mthassm. M»mnotJz 55317 Phøne 612.937.1900 GmmzlF4%612.937.5739 Enginming F4% 612.937.9152 Public Saftty F4% 612.934.2524 Web 1lIIJ1W.å.ch4nh4ssm.mn.us CHANHASSENFIRE DEPARTMENT POLICY CHANHASSENFIRE DEPARTMENT NOTES TO BE INCLUDED ON ALL SITE PLANS I. Fire Marshal must witness the flushing of underground sprinkler service line, per NFP A 13-8-2.1. 2. A fmal inspection by the Fire Marshal before a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. 3. Fire DeDartment access roads shaH be provided on site during all phases of construction. The construction of these temporary roads will conform with the Chanhassen Fire Department requirements for temporary access roads at construction sites. Details are available. 4. Oi1site fire hvdrants shall be provided and In operating condition during all phases of c()ñstruction. 5. The ~ of liauefied Detroleum I!:as shall be in conformance with NFP A Standard 58 and the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code. A list of these requirements is available. (Seè policy #33-1993) 6. Allfire detectionÌmd firè sUDDression svstems shall be monitored by an· approved UL central station with a UL 72 Certificate issued on thesè systems before final occupancy is issued. 7. An 11" x 14" As Built shall be provided to the Fire Department. The As Built shall be reproducible and acceptable to the Fire Marshal. . (See policy #07-1991)ó ... ChanhassenFire Departmènt fire Prevention Policy #94~199í Date: 11/22/91 Revised: 06/05/98 Page 1 of2 " ,~~;: l \. , 8. An aonroved lock box shall be provided on the building for fire department use. The lock box should be located by the Fire Department connection or as located by the Fire Marshal. 9. Hil!h-oiled combustible storage shall comolv with the requirements . of Article #81 of the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code. High-piled combustible storage is combustible materials on closely packed piles more than 15' in height or combustible materials on pallets or in racks more than 12' in height. For certain special-hazard commodities such as rubber tires, plastics, some flammable liquids, . idle pallets, etc. the critical pile height may be as low as 6 feet. 10. Fire lane signage shall be provided as required by the Fire Marshal. (See policy #06-1991). II. Maximum allowed size of domestic water service on a combination domestic/fire sprinkler supply line policy must be followed. (See policy #36-1994). êtp"bI"""'~ D""'" ChanhassenFire Department Fire Prevention Policy #04-1991 Date: 11/22/91 Revised: 06/05/98 Page 2 of2 , . MEMORANDUM TO: Sharmin AI-Jaff, Senior Planner Steven Torell, Building Official ~ February 1,2002 FROM: DATE: SUBJ: Site Plan review for American Legion Post #580 Planning Case: 2002-3 Subdivision and 2002-2 Site Plan I have reviewed the plans for the above building received by the Planning Department on January 15,2002. Following are my comments, which should be included as conditions of approval. 1. The building is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system. 2. The plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the St¡lte of Minnesota. 3. Demolition permits must be obtained form the Inspections Division before demolishing any structures. 4. Detailed occupancy related code requirements will be reviewed when complete plans are submitted. It is evident however that the assembly space in the basement must be of one-hour fire-resistive construction and the exits as designed do not comply with the code. 5. The proposed building on Lot 1 was not reviewed for building code compliance. 6. The owner and or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. G/safety/stlmemoslplan! American Legion CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 City Center Drive PO Box 147 ChanhilSsen. Minnesota 55317 Phone 952.937.1900 Ges/eral Fax 952.937.5739 Engineering Department Fax 952.937.9152 Building Department Fax 952.934.2524 \\7eb Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Sharmin Al-Jaff, Senior Planner Mahmoud Sweidan, Engineeréf February 5, 2002 FROM: DATE: SUBJ: Preliminary Plat Review of Park Nicollet 1st Addition (American Legion) - Land Use Review File No. 01-20 Upon review of the plans dated January 15, 2002, prepared by Sunde Engineering, Inc., I offer the following recommendations: GRADlNGIDRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL The current plans show a building with a proposed floor elevation of960.75 on Lot I. The future building on Lot 1 is shown with a proposed pad elevation of957.00. At these elevations, storm water from the buildings will drain toward each of the proposed catch basins. The parking lot storm drainage will be conveyed via storm sewer to a proposed enlarged storm water pond at the southeasterly corner ofthe site for treatment prior to discharging to the existing storm. sewer system. The applicant should be aware they will be responsible for cleaning the existing storm water pond after enlargements have been completed. The pond is required to be designed to National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) standards. The applicant has submitted drainage calculations for the site. Staff will work with the applicant's engineer to revise the calculations. Prior to fmal platting, storm sewer design data will need to be submitted for staff review. The storm sewer will have to be designed for a 10-year, 24-hour storm event. Drainage and utility easements will need to be dedicated on the final plat over the public storm drainage system including ponds, drainage swales, and wetlands up to the 100-year flood level. The minimum easement width shall be 20 feet wide. Emergency overflows from all stormwater ponds will also be required on the construction plans. Staff recommends that silt fence be added around the storm water pond grading limits of the site. The silt fence must be Type II. All of the proposed rock construction entrances must be lengthened to 75 feet as per City Detail Plate No. 5301. UTILITIES The plans propose on extending the sanitary sewer from the existing sanitary manhole at Trunk Highway 5 and water from an existing watermain along the east side of the The City of Chal/hassen. A i!!owin~ community with clean lakes. quality schooh. a charmin~ downtown. thrivin~ businesses. and beautilùl parks. A fT'eat place to live, work, and pla~ Sharmin Al-Jaff February 5, 2002 Page 2 parcel. The watermain line will be considered a public utility line since it will serve more than one lot. As such, minimum 20-foot wide easements will be required over the public portion of the utility lines. Installation of the private utilities for the site will require permits and inspections through the City's Building Department. The site has been previously assessed for utilities in the amount of $36,866.03. Since the developer will be installing the lateral utility lines, no additional lateral connection fees will be applied. Each newly created lot will be subject to City sanitary sewer and water hook up charges at the time of building permit issuance. The 2002 trunk utility hook up charges are $1,383 per unit for sanitary sewer and $1,802 per unit for water. Public utility improvements will be required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed construction plans and specifications will be required at the time of final platting. The applicant will also be required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. Permits ftom the appropriate regulatory agencies must be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, Department of Health, Watershed District, Carver County, MnDOT, etc. STREETS AND PARKING LOT No public streets are proposed as part of this project. The applicant is proposing full access to the site ftom Lake Drive East and will utilize another existing right-in/right- out access (south ofthe parcel) that is shared with the Hidden Valley 2nd Addition (gas station) onto Great Plains Boulevard. The applicant should be aware that they will be responsible for closing off the existing American Legion (west) access, removing the existing bituminous and tying in between the curb along Great Plains Boulevard ( east side). Also, the two accesses shall be connected to serve the proposed American Legion building. Staffhas no objections to the location of these accesses. Concrete driveway aprons will be required for the access. As the two accesses will service more than one lot, cross-access easements will need to be obtained and recorded against the lots. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Private utility easements will be required for the storm sewer line that runs ftom Lot 2 to Lot I. 2. Add the following City ofChanhassen Detail Plate Nos. 1002, 1004, 1006, 2101,2109,2201-2205,3101,3106-3108,5204,5207,5214, 5234 and 5300. Sharmin Al-Jaff February 5, 2002 Page 3 3. Prior to final plat approval, a professional civil engineer registered in the state of Minnesota must sign all plans. 4. The pond is required to be designed to National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) standards. 5. Cross-access easements for the shared driveway accesses must be obtained and recorded against the lots. 6. The minimum rock construction entrance must be 75 feet. 7. The applicant must obtain a permit from MnDOT for grading in the right-of- way. 8. Staff will work with the applicant's engineer to revise the calculations. Prior to final platting, storm sewer design data will need to be submitted for staff review. The storm sewer will have to be designed for a 10-year, 24-hour storm event. Drainage and utility easements will need to be dedicated on the final plat over the public storm drainage system including ponds, drainage swales, and wetlands up to the 100-year flood level. The minimum easement width shall be 20 feet wide. Emergency overflows from all stormwater ponds will also be required on the construction plans. 9. Staff recommends that silt fence be added around the east side of storm water pond grading limits ofthe site. The silt fence must be Type II. All of the proposed rock construction entrances must be lengthened to 75 feet as per City Detail Plate No. 5301. 10. Any off-site grading will require easements from the appropriate property owner. 11. Minimum 20-foot wide easements will be required over the public portion of the utility lines. 12. Installation of the private utilities for the site will require permits and inspections through the City's Building Department. 13. Each newly created lot will be subject to City sanitary sewer and water hook up charges at the time of building permit issuance. The 2002 trunk utility hook up charges are $1,383 per unit for sanitary sewer and $1,802 per unit for water. 14. Public utility improvements will be required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Sharmin Al-Jaff February 5, 2002 Page 4 Detailed construction plans and specifications will be required at the time of final platting. The applicant will also be required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies must be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, Department of Health, Watershed District, Carver County, MnDOT, etc. 15. Cross-access easements will need to be obtained and recorded against the lots for each of the entrance drives. 16. On the utility plan: - Revise catch basin nos. 2, 3, 4, and 7 to catch basin manhole nos. 2, 3, 4, and 7. - Revise sheet title to "Preliminary Utility Plan". - Shift the watermain toward the southeast corner adjacent to the curb and call the fittings. - Show the utilities easement. - Add a storm sewer schedule. - Change the type of public watermain from DIP to PVC C-900. - Show the proposed pipe slope, class and length of the storm sewer. - Under the Sewer and Water Notes, add, "All sanitary services shall be 6" PVC SDR26. ~ 17. On the grading plan: - Show all existing and proposed easements. - Show the benchmark used for the site survey. - Add a note "clean existing pond after pond enlargement grading is finished". - Revise sheet title to "Preliminary Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plan". - Add a note for removing existing bituminous and close off the existing (west) American Legion access. c: Teresa Burgess, Public Works Director/City Engineer Matt Saam, Assistant City Engineer jms g:\eng\projects\park nicollet\ppr.doc ";.. ,~~ ;' 1.- , 41~".;/ ./,:... // NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 2002 AT 7:00 P.M. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7700 MARKET BLVD. PROPOSAL: Subdivision and Site Plan Review APPLICANT: American Legion Post #580 LOCATION: Hwy. 5 and Great Plains Blvd. NOTICE: You are invited to attend a public hearing about a proposal in your area. The applicant, American Legion Post #580, is requesting subdivision of 5.584 acres into two lots and Site Plan Review with variances for the construction of an 8,617 square foot building located on the southeast comer of the intersection of Highway 5 and Great Plains Boulevard. Park Nicollet 1st Addition. What Happens at the Meeting: The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. Questions and Comments: If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen 227-1134. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. Notice of this public hearing has been published in the Chanhassen Villager on February 7,2002. . .~umm~~c th City Review Procedure Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments, Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. The staff prepares a report on the subject application. This report includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council . may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerciaVindustrial. Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also .available to review the project with any interested person(s). Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Smooth Feed SheetsTM AMERICAN LEGION-CHAN POST 580 7995 GREAT PLAINS BLV , CHANHASSEN MN 55317 AMOCO AMERICAN OIL CO ao ERNST & YOUNG LLP PO BOX 06529 CHICAGO IL 60606 CITYOF~~ ao SCOTT BOT 690 CI})'. 147 CJV\NHASSEN MN 55317 ~CHAELJSORENSEN 12625 58TH ST MAYER MN 55360 PETER J & KATHERINE A MANDY 6210 NEAR MOUNTAIN B CHANHASSEN MN 55317 BAM PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC 440 79TH ST W CHANHASSEN MN 55317 , DAVID S JOSSI 250 HIDDEN LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JAMES B & KAREN A COOK 260 HIDDEN LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ERIC S LINVILLE & KAFI E COHN 280 HIDDEN LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LEE & MARY KAUFMAN 300 HIDDEN LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JEFF & KAREN HONGSLO 310 HIDDEN LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MARK A METZ 320 HIDDEN LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DAVID A LYONS & JULIE TENHOFF-L YONS 330 HIDDEN LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MATTHEW J PATTEE & DONNA E SPINELLI 340 HIDDEN LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 RICHARD C & JULIE L NESSL Y 350 HIDDEN LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JAMES A & CAROL A DDSTUEN 360 HIDDEN LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MICHAEL R SCHNABEL & SANDRA J ST AI 370 HIDDEN LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 BISRA T & DENISE ALEMA YEHU 380 HIDDEN LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 WILLIAM R & DEBRA E PRIGGE 390 HIDDEN LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 NGUYEN & BINH NGD CHAD 8080 HIDDEN CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 Use template for 5160~ KEVIN R & DONNA J BECKER 8060 HIDDEN CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 BRIAN 0 & JEAN M STECKLING 8040 HIDDEN CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 THOMAS P & ANITA M BOT AMER 8020 HIDDEN CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PAUL R & MICHELLE M HAIK 261 HIDDENLN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 KEITH & DELORES H BLATZHEIM 271 HIDDENLN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DAVID L & MEGAN M KLEIN 8000 HIDDEN CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ANTHONY & MARY PAVLOVICH 8010 HIDDEN CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LAUREN C & SHAUNA J KOPP 8020 HIDDEN LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SHANNON N MCCLARD & SHERRIE R PETERSON 8030 HIDDEN CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 EMORY L & DAL YNN J HOCH 8061 HIDDENCIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 Smooth Feed Sheets™ JASON L & SHEll..A J BRAST AD 8071 HIDDENCIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 , ¡ Use template for 5160f> GRACE DEVELOPMENT LLC 18202 M1NNETONKA BL' WAY7.ATA MN 55391 MICHAEL E RAMSEY 6362 OXBOW BND CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JULIE K REDMOND CHANHASSEN lIRA CITY OF CHANHASSEN 8081 mDDEN CIR 690 CITY CE C/O SCOTT BOTCHER CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHAS MN 55317 690 CITY 147 CH SSEN MN 55317 NANCY L HELLAND DISCOVERY UNITED METH CHURCH CHANHASSEN INN 8091 mDDENCIR 950 TRUMBLE ST 531 79TH ST W CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHASKA MN 55318 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MARK & CARLA THOMPSON 311 mDDENLN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 THOMAS J& JODIE SCHLEYER 321 HIDDEN LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 BRIAN E SEMKE & DEBORAH C DEUTSCH 331 HIDDENLN ŒANHASSEN MN 55317 RANDY G & KIMBRA J GREEN 8103 MARSH DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ROBERT J & LOIS A SAVARD 8080 MARSH DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 TODD R & KELLY G WALKER 8090 MARSH DR ŒANHASSEN MN 55317 MARTIN J & TIMAREE FAJDETICH 8100 MARSH DR ,CHANHASSEN MN 55317 - BLUE CIRCLE INVESTMENT CO 1304 MEDICINBTIMIB DF PLYMOUTH MN 55441 CHANHASSEN NH PARTNERSHIP 900 2ND AVE SlIOO INTERNATIONAL CE MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 NORTHCOTT COMPANY 250 EAST LAKE DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SILO I LLC 200HWY 13 W B URNSVILLE MN 55337 AUSMAR DEVELOPMENT CO LLC C/O LOTUS REALTY PO BOX 235 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 AUSMAR DEVELOPMENT CO LC C/O LOTUS REALTY OX 235 CH N MN 55317 HOLIDAY STATION STORES INC 4567 80TH ST W BLOOMINGTON MN 55437 01~\o/¡t~~1 TlfL\~: ¥,1lM28Wn~.N45 FINN ?!\1f.~Eb~, ~~~f~~~ ". -.. . - . : :.: ;. CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 caUL TER DRIW CHANHAS8EN, MN 56317 (512' 937-1900 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION ~APPUCANT: AtlJf.Il..I(AJ.! (..ç,/OO - Pth-rJSBQ . OWNER: -.5.Þrn1E- ADDRESS: AfllåltÀ/./ L£t..1tJ./ J.h1C./J./t;. CdlP. ADDRESS: P.t). ß(J£ .~n:t. r ~A..1#A<qð., fhI..L,>t;JI7 Ta.EPHOM: (Daytime) 9£;J. tit, 7 . .~ I/.~ 1'ëLePHONE: . . _ com~. Plan Amendment _ TømporarySalas Perm~ . . . _ Vacation of ROWIEa&ements ~ co~ Use Permit ~ lit:> InlBrlrn rf,Be Permit -'- Variance - ''¡O'Þ ,. _ Non-conlormlng Use Permit _ Wetland Alteration Permit -i.. P'5~ve'opmenr _ Zoning Appeal ~ Rezo'rSO"t> _ Zoning OrdlnanCl!! Amendment _ S/gn~1ts _ Sign Plan Review +- Not~icaUon Sign f" /5'1> .x. Site Plan Review" ~ :1.~ -2L Escrow lor Filing Fees/Attorney Cosr' . 1-Z5b .,...i'o 1100f)~..çy.. I ($5()oCUPISPRIVACNARlWAP~ .. and Sounda. IP400 Minor SUB) W. ~~.ø TOTALFEEs/n:lA.;&J.. A list of a" property 0WI1e1$ Within 500 feet 01 the boundaries 01 1M property must be Included wnh tne appllcallon. - REQUEST G-f7Y OF c.IIWJ/~ú.J íb ?1l.£!4R.E BuIldIng materlalnmp/e8 mullt be submitted with cite Plan revlllW& "TwerIty"8lx full.lzø 1A1åII copies 01 the Plans muilt b. aubmltted, Inok/cIIng an 8%:" X 11" reduc:ed copy 01 transparency for each plan sheet. - Escrow will be required for other applications through the development oontraot NOTE· When multiple applications are prooesl>ed. the appropriate fee shall be charged lor each BppflCstion. , 06'Ò?,r· (; .,. "1 /7J~1i~ TJtn· TIr. . -"!~.l">.~T»A:". ....y ,:rt.,8,st.fhh,.__ Jf¿gg2l006 "t'ì.v'b~, ~~~m~n 14.1 003/006 I4f(IO~ PROJECTN... Aro1;,j¿I lÞrtJ U4/mJ - þm,,:711J;80 l.OCA7ION bQ~.vr Pi..ü.v.. fJ.LVD l'AKFô blJ..tvf!:: ~-r / 1.EGAL.œscRIPTION - ~-6.CfJJ&Æ1'> I"'J2J A-~fh::I'I ,æ~_hhtLJý PlAr- TOTAl. ACREAGE WE11ANDS PRESSNT P.RëSENTZONING fiE01JES1ED ZONING PRESENTLAND USE DESIGNATION 07. J;t Ad?.Eb. YES X NO J./[;, t,.JJ1!.cili/co'b BlL"'>" hl!:'<!:< ~~AoR..J1tJo~ Jl.u<1J.Iç,c.~ ßEQUESlED LAND USE DESIGNATION REASON FOR THIS REQUEST - This app\ìçatiOII must be complel9d in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by aft information and plans mqujred by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before tiling this application, you should confer with the Planning Depar1ment to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirementS applicable to your application. A t!etermlnatJon of completeness of lhe application shall be made within ten business days of application submIttal. A written notice Dr application dellcll!flcies shB,\1 be mailed to !I1tIeppllcan! within IIIn business days of appllcallon. ThiÎI is to cø11lly that I 8/TI making application for the described action by !he City and that I am reaponsible for complying with aD City reQUirements with regard to this request. ThIs application should be processed in my name and I 8/TI the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownÐl$hlp (either copy of Owne(s Duplicate Certificate of· TItle. Ab$qct of TItle or purchase agreement), or I am the autha~d person to make this apþJicalløn and the fee owner has also signed this appRcatlan. 1 Wi11 klHl¡> myself Informed of the deadlines for submIssion 01 material atld tile progress of this appHcatlon. further understand thaI additiOnal fees may be charged for consulting fees. feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authoriZatJon to proceed WIth the study. The documents and Information I haw submItted are true and COmtct to the be.t of my knowledge. The city hentby notifies the appllc.ant that development review cannot be completed wfthi1 60 days due to pubØc hearing Tequlrements and agençy review. Therefore. the oity Is notifying the applioant th<lt the oily raqulre8 an automatic eo day ÐXlensiOn for development review. Development review shall be complBled within 120 daya unless addllfonal review extensions are approved by ths applicant. ..~~ C ß~ {:¡"'"<..-cc- h'{".... t,r,fSftJ 1-/1-6;}.- S~AppIIcarJJ Date .~ _ Ct is;';Õ u (C. <-- ¡¿~ <; ...-ß....-"¡ 1-//- () d- srg Qf Fe. Owner Data . ~ Z2.- App"~1on ReceIved on I !¡.:, 10 2- Fee Paid 0 79J. Receipt No. I I 'The .ppDcant should contact 118ft for a copy of the staff ...pon which will be ayallable on Friday prior to the meeting. If nøt contacted, a copy of the report will be mailed to the appllcant's addre... ,01Mò~tòJl~ TIiJ' {If.: ~'C:FM :6Mi6%~~~545 FINN V,-W\Eh~, f.ß~m~,~ ~on4l006 lomn! f. ,.'> J :z j 8 ! ~ ~I G=\ "- ~ - ~" ~ -j ~.&;-.r ~ "oj' r-... "'lQ \j "- .! :z f :>L .. ~ i ~ < ] :J 1ï-l¡i ~ IIHj!fd 11111,111:111 I r. :II ,0 i :1!11if~J' jI f JI, b if . fD[dfiifl ! IJ'fllJ'lJI . I J.. h' f mmidj i Uf~~J}!~L ;¡ 'I'~' .1..,1 ~ ; jli11lft ~ JIJf..hl j ~ ~ ~JS)f!!J~~ jl ~ j j~jl~JJ}JJ jJ , ): ". ~~!. " "; ... .,.. ~ 1~ j ; f f J ! j .'; .J. t ., '!liD.. Fl.".... I f'n·· LJ ~ ';;!;;;I! ! b § ~uUUu I ~ ~ -1. 0 ' U I ~ 0·'; " (, (;' ~ I~~~ ~h g~ ~i~uhlun~ 8 H um l~ !~ ~ .if, -;;¡ ,~~- ~ j - ~d2 ~j gift du tmJl j o . ~ 0 ~ us~~ ~HH ~8 oj ~~ ~~^.IJI _~ ~R mh I,. 1~1 ì:l~ I¡ r' H 1jJ i~ II) ij ~ì. 1¡ 1~1 :IIi )1 t., 'I u¡ n if !p, {1 iiJ H ! {. h i ¡ :Ii ~J I! ~ I~Jj j J1J~:I.1 I~I~ ~ liif 1 ij~~~1¡¡J:I:I:lit11 ~ IifI :I ~!!llJ"¡~¥~·'!! J ~tI~ f !~jjjjl ~~~!j~:I~ ~ J¡ l!H J I~mu ~w~$~. ~ 1.1.,- '·1' · - ~ <I !, I '¡III ~. ~ , nliU~U U!!IIIII ~U I~I~~III «-- e ....,...... : Illn, w 1·· I I,! ~ 1111, ~~~ ".. I 'II . ~8j (). I,¡¡I. ",0 II I ¡ i ill I I ~¡~ , Ilnl! i ª ~,u 1i'1I Ii · · . :, f · ~ ¡~ · 3 ;. ,I : I ;1 ¡nUll : '11 ig i ~ ! I I : f jt! t . hlml . a ~ -¡¡¡ . ~ . -Ii ail' II ... ., '--'-;-' L.\. ---,...,~.--~r.lf': P~ð !!iU~..I 'ea-'!2 I .. M II.. :) / / II~ - L I~JII ìU lilll . ~~i . ~~ u . -,,-,", , , ..' ,..!C..".-'; ¡ fj , I A ~f8 ~811i i \ -,/ \,,/ , ,/,,, ",' \ ~ ... . ~ (¡) _ t1RN»'Io1... C =c! ~ ~ ·11· lil!! II¡II I!!II:IAI -Q~ zz. §¡jl ~ffi:l ~~I i!i~ ¡!o I I i I I I I II' i lillil 1 II I ~ IIiI' !I II ¡¡I ¡ I I ~ 11111 ! II .,--- t ¡ I j ~ ('I) Ü rr I d " I ~ 'I Sit II: I! lu 111..3 I! I¥ , ~ _I ¡i ~ ~I ! ;J ~ ' '. 6 I ,¡ '. (Þ"" . .' ~ I '~L ti =ït- i!! II f.'lla ,~,I -B I ,~.. i ", ?t.,! 11 ?f.;i 11 ~! r~' :;';'11> ''''"'_1 :\¡!I ¡' I !I II: I . m II! .' ~ " --I f=-~R JJI ~ldl ~ l4r. ~ qj Ii ~II! ; I 11m. 6å I "' I!:~ " Ii - IW'. ' f . Io~ '. ¢tìi ~I: I ~ 1M! . ~ I~ 'I' ,.,1, I -~ I , ~ Jil!l ~'¡'I ~í:¡' I; I Î! t II rh~l~ill b! I, !~'ì!1 §I, ~ i k lGi!~l~lI~ fu I'! Iì I . <If -I =ïl I~I~III B I , - 8111 I ~r . .' -.J II II II Ii I. I :1 Is! I . " Ii . ,,, el II h II ~I I".... J!'¡l I ill Iltil.!~ dill I', !¡ 1¡1i¡ I~ìi' II!· 1'1If'j~ ¡,. I "'I il ¡I'I ' Iii II!. 1,iJ'!l Pfl III Illft'fi' I¡!I. ifl! I., III t II, Ii ¡Ilit !I,'! II ' . '{II' JI "11- f,ll : ¡ I,¡IIP ·¡¡¡Ii ,!.I. . ¡Iii! : ill. Ihl : Jill' I, '1¡~1 JiJI ; !'{IIII·II"I' fIll! : Ñ..!II§ t t I " ,,¡,.¡ i i j I I IJ' lIIJif.i~1 I 'II ..1 ~ II §th'I'1 111 J mJh;III¡¡::¡h\ '( dl ili¡ I' j' t~ !' !, J'fE ; 'I f I II . . 1.1:1 ¡'I ,1:11 Ii ~ 1IIIb'Î¡ìa~!!f'!1 ",', " :,'11 II III j1!I' . 1 It!~IJtftJ It I r I '11-1 fl 'I ~~f¡ II ! ~ ~ h l!i¡lit:~f¡fi! I' 't¡l. , J. 'I 11 ì I! ' f IW!:i~¡' I¡n,¡ ,l~ I :.,1 II! il II I!.I, 1'1·: I ,lll!l'I¡I:JHf:jl t Ii I ¡III .. hi If 1 ¡Ijl! 'I · I '11'11!1111!11( I :. I 1,1 :11. f 'II' II; !'II""II'III'"I.jll : n; Ill~ ¡'N J : I t :!:~liìi '1{1 111 i fl d'l! \: I:{ !h!¡ lf~ }1lllf!!:iI!::lf;hti!: ¡I,: 1 Iii: : III Ii I! ¡lilt: ,111- ~ 'Ii '1 !ll1illl'll~ I I, :111 ~ !!i !i ill Ii~if i~, II II JJlhdti!/ih II I III IIi! 1IIIil'I, U I I,if, ðH 11111'11' IU I Ii ¡I "! I 11,11 'Ii I ; I I I ~ ! Idl' I md! Hliilil,l~ " 'flD I 'If~', · 1li ~I~I~ u hi I, þ:':f : , ~Î "11 , II'", "1111 , I I, I" I'I~I :iI!d ~f '! I ' ~ II I' I '¡U"I I, Ii (I. " ~ rJl~ . Ii,; 1fm'! !:Iliì : ! :' , œ.~ 1,,1. ~1'IIIIIIJiJ" I J N. : t!Îz: J f' If; I ~1!f.11" J f I II ~ flflll II ~I ~'I dl!:':' 'IIJ!~: f: !: ~! : III II I· II'" (hi ºlú".1 'I f.f II 1:/ 11"1-' l'llllf! 'l'u,1 'i '¡ -J. : Ifl)1 ¡I I"." Inl' 'I 1,lf", I~ J: J : !Jill It~ ¡M( ~I! Æf iiI II ,ii ¡, ,f .II ¡:' ! L( Ii I, ril III f ~I i I í J' it!!!:;; I~lt¡il Ii ! Uti,,! :!i~IW!!li': il '¡I}lli . I WI, iJ 'f' i I II r;l¡ I¡ " f n!J!! I,I! !!¡!I.! i ! II i~~., ::~I,'fH: IffiJ lifl . I~' I~ I ~I"¡ II t ~tf , 'II II ,I,' I -,I : I;:! !';I ·II~I II I ': 'II/II ~III'rll!I, II, f "II. ~ ; Ifl" I.I~} I üf ( J I I It")f I~' III ; mf 'f'! (11if ," ~ . w::¡ ,I','I!il'I.¡í I !' ~ ~,/ Itlf¡ ìlil:~! '~i II·II!! ,. I:îijil i:f 'I i,f'l ~ ii' ~th ~'IJI! 'I' i 11!f'fllìijllltl,i It I I, Ibl~ : Ilf 11m .:dl I M ¡ J ¡IIf i :Ittld 11 Æ : :1 ~¡, ~ .,; '" -<I '" ..: ,:.. '" ,¡.. . '" .. .. 1 :: ¡ Þ. I Jltf I" I fJ. J" II I ' : ,;1 1,_ f': Ii ! I I , ! ~1¡~ i¡i!! ~ i)!¡ ¡~~, f, ¡ ~fl:!~ û! r,i ! W1'j¡¡ Ifj if ¡ j (,i,lr :'itl ¡I!', i~:'I_ljJ ,¡, Ii Ilf ¡fÎ /¡: ¡ I: ~ till ïii II , If :ì~I!~ 1111:1 If! il r,lf !îi'l~ i! Ii: ¡I d~Jllf if'! I., f ¡!!i l~, 5: :~ ! - If ItI!¡I L I' 1'1 Ilf I~ IN!'! fft '"I 'I,I¡ I J' ßI ! 'l'lf¡'{ i,_ II j ¡ Ii ~~::I; 11:~j,f f ¡Ii j ff"f' Iíî ~'lllf;f 'I¡J!II JI~ 1:1 I !IIi'lf; !J/' .f ' ! · I :r:¡¡t, ;,t~tI ¡I¡ t I 'la, {Ii' ff f 't JI !t't' 1:11 h'î 'I, t I , ~ it îi!fifi '¡lid ¡ ;i!f lll~! ~ !fIlfi!!! iij :: ill!ii!¡ ilf; Uh! ¡¡!~ !~¡ :;f ¡; f j : if ,:f¡,nt I,;J:¡ I ¡!! /I ¡:¡¡ I ¡ 'filIi::! ill if i Itill IIJ J ;f~i I !I!; :':IJ ¡Iii 4 i J ¡ if ~!i!iJ!1 iM;! ¡ iij: il JIll I !:I~îlfi ~u II ¡!¡'ill ~i! j¡Ii i :;I! i¡lfi ;Ii; I, , : ~ Iii ¡!II:!U: iMf t il:: ¡¡ i~ii t Î ~ulfJ1II!¡ 'i II,flt!f I~¡ II!f~I' Afl'f'! f';!;i ì!': ill i · I .. li~ I ','!II ' ~I}J II' . '·'J.tlit ,I¡ " It: 'Ii f:; "', I 11 'fl' !'I' I) I , : 'I ;i;bí:i li~:!', ! ~Jt '! M ¡ ! U!,!i!lfllJl¡lfJlfl!','j' I!f: IJ11, II1II !if i :'f:i ~I q I, Ih!d! f,lil: }j111l/fll ¡"Iflt I'll ,\1 fll I :·1 H..": ! If¡ !}'.l¡ :.:¡ I i I ¡ Ii ,;s ;11 'It) JI''': Iii I ~ ,11) U: 'i ,11/1'11 ,. J! r IYf . I 11- I I, mhtl! j~¡;h j ll! II ]f ! I '"IWd 11/ II J¡I . i .ì, ! f~h J .1.1 Is lIlli, HI I I - .. oj .. '" .... II .. !f ::!! ::! :! 'Jf ~ ::!'! I!! R ~ ::i:! 1·1 1:1 II "h. 'f f\ ·1 Ie 'I I I I: J,' ':II! f ;!' 'îi i f· iJ'III!!ìf ' t II! : t 21' !i: il I Ii i ifP¡ ! it }I¡ i JiI., !i!jl ! f~fir ¡ I I tl I II ! 1! I !11f; f ,If If, i it I}J flfl'i ! I'! II I I II t I II I ~ , 'It." I j!¡I!J:::¡ '!I i:l !I III ! I II; Ii . If ¡ ~f~ H I ~ III; ¡~! ! i: I¡i ¡!fiill ì iil ~I !I f fl, ir¡ i ·'i ¡i fit! ¡ . H! n ¡ · I" If .- 'I 'iI ,¡hi 'II! I ì !I Iii "J I' I . J I' II f JI jl I ~ 1J PI f* fl! !. f II ÌlII j!'t¡11 fi .~ til jl '}'16 i! ¡Î 1 pJ!.! I"! . 'Ii .! ¡: ! . II: ,.:1 .: I: 1;1, ':!Inl il ~IIII 61 q: Ii! ~: I IF. f!f .!I I f II!I {I j ~ ; If" i: flfll ",I: I! ~ m¡ 15!JJjl t! If! !t. !~ ¡II !J ilft~ i I!f f. :1:, ! I i :IÎ:f I: . "".1 I I !! I,. tltf ¡' .1 f~1 ,', 'I I II I' I I_ II. I If I! IIi:' I ¡ ~ n i J Jft! :I! d Ii hit Jlhm II III itlll II !II !III! If I!l J n ill , JI ! ill I/! II , ;¡:'-~ t5 . ¡ __...,..... J'''lIJa J n -~ .......,.,.¡¡¡¡¡- ""- - Y.10S3NNIN'NilSSVHNVH::J ~ ..................eMI .1SYJ MUla .)IV' c . ..J!l..I.J,I..6J~...MJI"'~_ ,._.....- ~5 ~ SJ~J1I1Ip 1III!J ....I;':-.=."%.. 08!ì# .LSOd . NO.9a, NV:>IHaWV e! ci: -. -- :c J .....-......... ¡hi I"'I!. ~ilii prll~ II:I! ß! ~ ¡: HI ~ I : i !I s ,i!i.1 I~ I ~!~; ~ I c i, if-II III!' II' fl!!ï ¡~. Ii Ii III ...II,!IG ~ ... I : d _ II w I ~n~ ~I nil . . ¡H¡;!;I} 1,1, .1 i " ¡¡II ¡ ¡ I : !I!; I HI. illli ~. ~ ~ § i . :< ~ i ~ I In' !ill t . ------- I · · I · · ( ~"'~ [ ~ .ç~, ( - ) , , 1......¿4'14 -1-- } (\ \ \ \\7 ..~ ~ ......... :w:=' ~.................. ~- ..ø...r......ø.......~~....N'...n-..ll"~ .._..;..._ 8(31111tD UUIT ~,:".::e'!:~' "--r -I --.............. Y~OnNNIN 'H!lSh'HNYH3 un ilAIHQ ilXY1 085# ~SOd . NOI9:!' NY:)IH:!WY I OJ ill 1ft if! -. II 10 " Ie I j If .. ... '" .. ~ I In ~I III III 'f II II n u I n .. .. .. ~ ( . . . · . . · · . i .. '1 .. z . f f . . 'I ~ I ~ · ~ ~ · · f il ~ b · · · b I . ; ! ø I . · I I ü ot$o II I~ . I :f/I c e I II ! . :1,' !I, II! I I ¡; I bit! I II! II ( ~ .~ - ) \ \ \ . ; ¡In t ~ 1!1 'I'" I Ii cé I ~IIJ"- ¡¡¡¡¡~ ..~;;;.-¡;¡- ""- - ._--, ~11 ... 1411'..................... 08S# ~SOd .~:;;; N":>11I:l1III" f I J I ~~ . ..JLr-Ø....J...r"""A..Jr..lr_ ..-..... N SJ~lr01Jp 1I1IIJ .... -=::"1-1; Ii! ci: -.:'---- --........- ,f'''''~ '" '~ , ~" ..."..".......-.. "I I ~ V r----1M:~~Ç~';~ . _ ~, ._J I;:~.~~I;~I.:.~ il L..____.:JI,I,I,., I I ===> . ¡ , ===> .. -ì I I : i I I J ",,' IIIY,U I ~ j ! "--- --......... - iii fð1'~. ~FF ., "'II) , ~D ~ :Ii ...... ...- =-.... :==r ............-.......... ..J&.r...J:J....JJ..N...LJ-Ø'..K.. SJQJU8p OUJ ""- - Y~OS:lNNI" 'N3ISSYHNYHO .L8Y3I3INHa:l:H'I1 ¡¡¡¡I ..-..,,- '-~=€-' ....., - . --...... ..... 085# ~SOd - NOI9:!' NY:)IU:!WY - = ---rr-- --,r-- :::¡r::: nJ I II .. ! . I I I t r------------------- I r------------------ " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " , , , , , , , , , , , . . , , , , , , , , , , " " " " " " " " L=::::::::::::::::::;l " " " " " " " " " , " , " , " , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , " I: : :: ¡ " , " , L=::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~J I i I . , Ë . t ! I II ! E ~ i ì I~ h N . N ct ~ II ·.11- 11n =--.. :==r "'- Y.L08i1NNIW 'NHSY'HNYH:I ... .............~... J.8YiIII\IIKII:MY1 I . ..s...r...a....~J~....d......~ ..-.....- M Ø(apmp IIDIJ ._~::æ='%.' 08S# ~SOd - NOI9i1' NY:)IHilWY ~ ci: -. -- . ----,..... I; ( I II 111111 I II Itll; IIIH!!. 000019>000 !, i1!~U.w l~i~:j .¡.'~.~.·.!.i , ¡t"H; ·jjf¡ïmH1i. UI"!"" JliU¡¡;, \t1~>Íï\: , '~:jlli~¡i.i.' "1" ; · H : ~mr rur~tl~ ·,ii,,, '·Ü '.'"' L F .H. ,-, jU" ~. u.... ~~...~... .................. .J!IJ....a-'JJ.JI"...n....D".Œ.., 8(aJU8p 1IIIfJ "'- ..-....- ..-:=-.:=::1- --........- 085# .LSOd . NOIO,i1 NY:>11I3WY YolO"NNI.. 'N:;¡SSYHNYH~ .lSYa illWla iDlY, ¡¡¡¡I I 5 N . CW) C ,~================ I ~~8~ ~ I~ ~ II . . (~.. I- I! l!il !.hl !!! j I .111111111 i i 1I1III1II IIi ~ ! IIIIII1I 1'111 'II . I, I! ! I !, .J J I ,I!, ,II, ,,, I hll ~ g L, i! .. 1 . ft ¡ S? . I' ", I mil i'ddll I. I' II 11)1 II,'' II I~jl ' ' ( I II .I. II ( ---- r ) . ((UJ)':OC.l"r.z~I' '1..Ç~.U:·(:r;; '" I ~ (\ \\'Vr::~--' ..) r_~~ .,- ! '" m.¡.'. (jJ !, P "1 >'. j ~ -.. ..- ::-... r=:=r .................... _lL..J"---1I...........~........-'J.__...ft:.. SJapmp UOJJ "'- - Y.LOSaINNIII "NJ8SYHNYH:J .LSYa MnICIIDIY1 08S# J.SOd - NOI9..' N":)IH....." ..-..... ._-~. .-.., - ...-...... ~ I; , I , I , I t!. 10 ,... .ti w ~ « cñ u: . -: W I II ;11111 1 1111111; II iilll 00000000 (c================ I 5 "I'" . ('I) ci: t!. qo ,... « w ~ « c4 ~ 'W ~~ .- ;;:--... :w:=- .. ... ...... .... .... ..J.L.r.....ø...Jr~~..rr,..LJ......~ Ø(aJUVp UllJJ ""- - Y.LOI:lNNIIIiI 'NnIYHNYH3 .1.8,,:1 :ll\RIG :lJIY1 1U N I . ell) 5 C '#. T- ,... <i w a:: « en ~ w ,._....- ,_"-~'t.. _....=--::;;. ...-"'......- 08S# ~SOd . N0193' NY:)IH3WY '#. It) ,... <i w a:: « en u.. - ui (t================ Planning Commission Meeting - February 19,2002 Kind: Yeah. Sacchet: Okay. Alright. Thank you. BIackowiak: We'll go ahead. There's been a motion and a second. Sidney moved, Claybaugh seconded that the Planning Commission recommends denial of the variance for the use of a private street based on the findings in the staff report, and denial of the variance for the 60 by 60 foot building pad requirement. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously 5 to O. BIackowiak: Okay. Next. Sacchet: Madam Chair. I'd like to make a motion that the Planning Commission tables approval of the preliminary plat for Knob Hill 2"" Addition as submitted. BIackowiak: Okay. Been a motion. Is there a second? Sidney: Second. Sacchet moved, Sidney seconded that the Planning Commission tables approval of the preliminary plat for Knob Hill 2"" Addition as submitted. AIl voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously 5 to O. Sidney: Madam Chair, direction for staff? BIackowiak: Yes. So I was going to say, we need some direction here. So I think we all made some comments concerning I think in general the wish for a public street rather than a private street. We would like staff to work with the applicant to look at reducing the right-of-way from 60 to 50 feet. Possibility of shifting that public street to the west a little bit. and in that same vein realignment of Lots 1,2, and 3, Block 2. Pulling them a little bit closer, a little bit further to the southeast or southwest actually that would be. And same thing with Lot 1. Or Block 1, Lots 4, 5 and 6. Potentially just shifting as available to pull them a little bit away from the slope and the trees back there. And then also Vii had talked about a 60 foot preservation easement, tree preservation easement around the entire thing. Look into that. Commissioners, anything to add that I'm missing here. Sidney: I guess encourage the applicant to bring this before the neighbors again for discussion. BIackowiak: And I know we have kind of a short time line but we want to try to keep this moving through and just keep the lines of communication open. Any other comments? Alright, and I'd like to thank all the neighbors tonight who got up and took their time to speak before us this evening. We really appreciate that. And right I'm going to take a 5 minute recess before item number 4 which is the project for the Legion site. So 5 minutes, we'll be right back. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDER THE REOUEST FOR SUBDIVISION OF 5.584 ACRES INTO TWO LOTS AND SITE PLAN REVIEW WITH VARIANCES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN 8.617 SOUARE 34 Planning Commission Meeting - February 19,2002 FOOT BUILDING LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF HIGHWAY 5 AND GREAT PLAINS BOULEVARD. PARK NICOLLET 1ST ADDITION. AMERICAN LEGION POST #580. Public Present: Name Address John Keeler Don Magee Kenneth M. Wicklund Bemie Hamilton Joey Townsend Paul Differding Eric H. Weidner Bob Meuwissen Steven Lillehaug Pat Hallisey Dean Williamson 75 Thomas Lane 7995 Great Plains Boulevard 3970 Linden Circle 7995 Great Plains Boulevard 8043 Erie Avenue 7228 Frontier Trail 7031 Redwing Lane 201 West 77th Street 1441 Heron Drive 1304 West Medicine Lake Drive, Plymouth 6029 Killamey Lane, Edina Sharmiu AI-Jaff presented the staff report on this item. Blackowiak:: Alright commissioners, questions for staff? Any questions Deb? Kind: Yes I do Madam Chair. Sharmin, you did a great job of hitting most of my questions. The one, couple of questions. On the recommended conditions. I'm on page 19. Number 6 talks about a detailed lighting plan and it appears that there is a lighting plan in our packet. I'm assuming that you mean, you want more specifics about fixtures and that sort of stuff. Al-Jaff: Yes. Kind: Maybe put a little added language in there for clarity. And then condition number 20 that you're recommending on page 21 is not really worded as a condition. I assume you're open to re-wording that to get more of a condition. Al-Jaff: Yes. Kind: And then number 28. Is that one affected, this is on page 22. Is that condition affected by this new change of where that right-inlright-out is going to be located? Al-Jaff: No. It still remains the same. Kind: For clarity would it make sense to include in there where it's to be located? Al-Jaff: Sure. Access onto Great Plains Boulevard from future Lot I, Block 1. Kind: Shall be restricted. AI-Jaff: Shall be restricted to. 35 Planning Commission Meeting - February 19, 2002 Kind: That helps me for clarity. And then I noticed you got the recycling condition that's new. That looks good. AI-Jaff: If I may add one condition. Commissioner Kind asked me to add, she called it Uli's condition. Kind: Oh yes. Sacchet: Thank you. Sidney: What is it Uli? Kind: On number 20. Sacchet: I was very happy to see it in there. AI-Jaff: It should, we need to add silt, to condition number 20. We need to add silt fence shall be removed upon completion of the project. Kind: Which is known as the Vii condition. AI-Jaff: Yes. Kind: That's it for me for staff. Blackowiak: Okay. Other questions? Do you have questions? Sacchet: Yes. I have some questions. First of all, I'm still a little unclear where those not contrasting medallions are. If you could just help me out of that. Al-Jaff: Sure. Sacchet: It's those squares on top of what is like columns between the windows? AI·Jaff: Correct. Sacchet: Alright. I was just wanted to confirm. AI-Jaff: And if you look at your material. Sacchet: Yeah, they're not contrasting. It's very definite. AI-Jaff: This is what you will be looking at. Sacchet: Yeah, okay. AI-Jaff: We suggested something more in the. 36 ,-,.....'" Sacchet: That would be a contrast. Then I just want to clarify, the way this plan is in front of us, pretty much all the trees are gone. Is that an accurate observation? Except just those couple scraggly ones that happen to be on the corner there. Southwest corner that is. Planning Commission Meeting - February 19,2002 AI-Jaff: That is an accurate statement. There are quite a, some of those trees are dead. Sacchet: Some of them aren't in good shape. Some of them are. Actually some of them in the comer that don't get affected are dead. That's one of the problems I have. The ones that are not in the way are actually not in so good shape and the ones in good shape are seem to be pretty much all of them in the parking lot. AI-Jaff: That's true. Sacchet: Okay. Just want to make sure that I read this correctly. I don't want to read too much into it. Now in the past we used to say no to Colorado Spruce and have them do Black Hills Spruce. I don't know, that's kind of a Jill question but there's definitely Colorado Spruce specified in this, and I don't know. do we have a change in the. AI-J aff: I can check with Jill on that. Sacchet: Yeah. AI-Jaff: I'm not a tree expert but if there is... Sacchet: Yeah, in the past you used to have conditions that you would say they should do Black Hills Spruce or different than Colorado Spruce because our climate is I believe too humid or something that they don't do so well here. I'm not the expert but, so I want to make sure we're consistent. Now, one thing that kind of startled me on page 9, when it talks about the grading it says that the applicant will extend the NURP pond and then will be responsible for maintaining it because if they change it, they're going to have to maintain the whole thing. Is that what you're saying or? Al-Jaff: No. It's a shared maintenance. Sacchet: It will be still shared? AI-J aff: Agreement, correct. Sacchet: From the staff report I didn't come away with that understanding. Then with the parking requirements, we say well we calculated according to ordinance 156, but then they went out and made a study and the study said 120 and now 120 is fine. Please help me out. Is the ordinance, is something missing in the ordinance or does the ordinance state if somebody goes out and has a different study, then that supercedes the ordinance or how exactly does that work? AI-Jaff: Well, in the past whenever we've had compatible uses, we've always suggested, let's go with something that makes sense. And this is a perfect example of when a situation does make sense. Sacchet: Because it's the shared and it's different use. I mean I don't have a problem with that conclusion is right. 37 Planning Commission Meeting - February 19,2002 AI-Jaff: The timing on both of them is very compatible. Sacchet: So it's really on that basis that it's. AI-Jaff: Correct. Sacchet: Okay. Because I was wondering whether we need to do something about this ordinance because it seemed to be brushed aside more easily here. AI-Jaff: No. The ordinance works. The only other time we've used this is with churches versus office. Sacchet: Okay. Now since we are talking shared parking, what do, do you know what the timeframe is? Maybe we should ask the applicant that the clinic will actually be developed, because as of right now it would not be developed. AI-Jaff: 18 months from now. Sacchet: 18 months. About 2 years, okay. AI-Jaff: At least that's their estimate. Sacchet: Okay. Has there been any consideration coming back to the trees, has there been any consideration given to try to save some of these incredible trees that are in good shape? AI-Jaff: We have suggested retaining walls. The trees that are within the main drive aisles, they've suggested that they have to take them out. In the past what we've done, when you have trees in the middle of a parking lot. Not a drive aisle, but where yòu actually park the car, we've turned those into islands. Sacchet: So there has been some consideration to make an island or 2 or 3. Al-Jaff: We've talked about it. Now there will be grading on that site. In some areas there will be. cutting or filling, approximately 3 feet so we need to really look at. Sacchet: Well there are 4 real significant trees, and only one seems to have a chance to survive. One is kind of by the corner of where the building pad is for the clinic so that's a goner. That's actually the best one of all. That's, what a 26 inch oak there? And then west of that is a 30 inch oak together with those evergreens. That one seems to have a chance to be maintained, correct? Al-Jaff: Correct. Sacchet: That one is, yeah. However, the best, the biggest ones are the 48 incher and the 36 inch oak, kind towards the eastern side of that grove there. Like just north of the Citgo building. You with me? The 48 and 36. There's only one 48 and one 36. AI-Jaff: Here's the 36 and here's the. Sacchet: The 48 is just south of it. 38 , , Planning Commission Meeting - February 19,2002 j. t ~ t ~'. . AI-Jaff: Okay. Sacchet: And it could be a case made that both of those are in the drive aisle? . AI-Jaff: Yes they are. Sacchet: Okay. So there is no consideration trying to save those? Because they're in good shape and they're huge. They're hundreds of years old. They would survive us all if you take care ofthem. AI-Jaff: We can work with the applicant. Blackowiak: I think that's a Jill question. Sacchet: Ijust want a concern. We'll get back to that. We don't have to belabor it right now. I'll belabor it a little more. Blackowiak: I'm not worried. Sacchet: Moving on. The signs. The signs. You're saying that only 4 signs without pennit per lot, so and they're already using 2 so there are only 2 left for the clinic then? Al-Jaff: No. It's 4 directional signs per. Sacchet: Right, the directional ones is what I'm talking about. Al-Jaff: Correct. There are 2 separate lots. Sacchet: So they each can have 4. Al-Jaff: Correct. Sacchet: So it's not like they're using up 2 and then the other one is only stuck with 2. The other one is going to have 4. It's going to be treated like that, okay. AI-Jaff: So the entire site would enable 8. Sacchet: That clarifies that very nicely. And we're clear that we're not approving any signs with this one. When we say. in the building.. . saying that the exits as designed do not comply with code. I kind of wonder well what's missing? Is that maybe an engineering question? Sidney: Fire code. AI-Jaff: What we ran into something similar when we were constructing the senior center. Certain distance and number of doors out of a building, but these issues will be resolved as soon as the architect and the applicant meet with the building official. Sacchet: That's all my questions, thank you. 39 Planning ContDÙssion Meeting - February 19,2002 Blackowiak: Okay. Questions LuAnn? Sidney: Everybody's covered my questions. Blackowiak: Okay. Claybaugh: I've got nothing to add. Blackowiak: Okay. And 1 don't think I have any questions right now. Oh wait, I lied. Under the change that you gave us, page 12, talk to me about why the east property line, buffer yard was changed. AI-Jaff: Staff miscalculated. Blackowiak: Okay, no problem. That answers my question. That was an easy one. At this point would the applicant or their designee like to make a presentation? Please step forward to the podium and state your name and address for the record. Dan Doege: Madam Chair and contDÙssion members. My name is Dan Doege. I'm with Ben Daniels Architects. We're the architects for the American Legion. .. .and before we get started and forget, I want to thank Sharmin and the staff who have been very gracious in helping us through this process. We are here before you to ask for your approval on this and send this forward to City Council. I think that the Legion has been in your neighborhood since the 50's and we're looking at a very significant upgrade in it's existing structures on site. And we're looking at a very nice development for the comer of one of your major intersections in the city. We believe have produced a very nice looking building that fits into the topography of the particular site very nicely. Where it snuggles up against the eastern side toward the hill, and basically shields a lot of the parking from the Highway number 5. And between either the berming that we're going to do or the structure. And so the, with me tonight, in case I'm not able to answer your questions. I have a couple of the board members from the Legion, Tom.. .and Gene Borg and so between us hopefully we can answer all your questions. Instead of going through this entire development before you, I guess I would rather answer questions and because when we looked at your staff report and looking at their comments starting on page 16 under recommendations starting on page 16, we are in concurrence with all of them, with a few exceptions that I will state. But basically the, it's obvious that there will have to gain building permit approval through the building inspector and we'll have to be in compliance...It's a very minor issue that we're talking about. I believe it's a wall and a door that we're talking about to meet the city code... And we'll obviously have to take these and get permits and do the things that are listed as being required so those are all non-points. The issue that Sharmin brought up, was one of these access drive into the site off of Lake Drive East. And the question as to when it gets developed, basically how it gets developed. Right now it's key to kind ofthink about how this particular project is going to move forward. We plan on keeping the Legion open while we build the new building so the access off of Great Plains Boulevard is important to us while we keep the building open and we would use the Lake Drive East for the construction traffic. And when that is done...what we would like to do is when we build that access drive to the south part of the property, we would like to build that only up to the property line. And because this Phase IT development that you see of the proposed clinic is not designed yet. This is conceptual in it's form. The parking lot isn't nailed down 100 percent. And what, and also the grading plan is not 100 percent done. If we were to develop that road all the way through. that would limit the development that was going to be, and 18 months from now if we get your approval and can move forward.. .to the City Council, we hope to have a facility open by September of this year. October. So we're talking about a year's delay in time basically between one project and another. And so what we would like to do is one of two things. Either allow us to just have 40 Planning Commission Meeting - February 19,2002 the one entrance, which I understand is an issue in some cases, but the one entrance off of Lake Drive East. Or allow us to temporarily use the bituminous and the bit of Class V that is there between the Great Plains Boulevard and Lake Drive East that's basically part of the Legion parking lot now as a temporary access then until the clinic is fully designed and constructed. I know that there can be concems that maybe if something doesn't happen and that lot sits forever and ever, well I don't see that lot sitting forever and ever right on the comer like that. It's too valuable. And what the shame of it is, if we go ahead and put that drive in right now, we are going to be tearing it up in another year and what good is that? If we put that drive in now, maybe we're recovering more existing landscaping than what the ultimate design would be so we would choose not to want to continue that drive towards the east. And so either use what's there so we don't prematurely take down a tree that may be able to survive the ultimate design, or allow us to just do the access drive as far as the edge of our property to the west. That is the major, for us the major issue basically. Like I said, our greatest goal here is to gain your approval and to move forward to City Council. We have a time line that is very time sensitive, as you have never heard I'm sure in your entire life... The other thing I'm just going to throw up, and it's in regards to the sidewalk that, or the trail easement access north and south that is being proposed. And while we're not opposed to that, I would just bring it up as a point of question as to whether that is of high value for this particular facility. There is the walking path along Lake Drive East, but pedestrian traffic to the Legion is minimal at best and instead of taking 5 more feet and making a concrete, we could leave 5 more feet into landscaped area. And so while it's not a huge issue as far as we're concerned, we're willing to go either way with this. We'd just like to throw it up for your discussion, So with that I will ask you if you have any questions. Like I say here myself or the Legion is here to answer any questions. Blackowiak: Okay. commissioners any questions of this applicant? Craig. Claybaugh: I guess I first directed with respect to the easement to Bob and help clarify it. Does that easement, is that intended to tie in with that pedestrian bridge that comes over 5 at this point? Generous: For this... Claybaugh: Yes. Generous: Yes. Claybaugh: Okay. Blackowiak: No. No. No, not directly. Generous: Lake Drive East ties into it. Al·Jaff: You're referring to the sidewalk in the middle of the parking lot. The sidewalk is along Lake Drive, and the pedestrian bridge is further to the east of that across Highway 5. This is basically to carry individuals through the parking lot to the Legion building and then we would extend this out to Lake Drive. So it's a combination. It would serve two purposes. The first one is people that are parked out here would be able to use the sidewalk if you will to get to the Legion. At the same time. it's another connection that would extend out to Lake Drive. Blackowiak: Questions Deb. 41 Kind: Not to the applicant. Planning Commission Meeting - February 19, 2002 Blackowiak: No? Any questions for the applicant? Sacchet: Of course. Well I guess what I want to ask you about, those trees. Dan Doege: Are we talking about these trees right here? Sacchet: Yes. If you, as noted on the plan there you see which ones are 48 inch and close to it is a 36 inch. Those are the two that I'm really concerned about because they're in good health, as far as I can tell, and they're huge. They're old. They're beautiful. They're really a landmark and I think they're invaluable for the city. And so looking at where they are, they're sort of in a drive aisle. Dan Doege: I understand what you're saying and I'll answer it in two parts. First of all I will reiterate that we would like not to have to put in that access drive now, pre-empting any development plans for the clinic...So that's point number one. Point numbertwo is, this clinic site is not designed yet. It's not nailed down and I work for the Legion in developing their eastern parcel here so what's drawn on the west is not 100 percent. Sacchet: That's just a concept. Dan Doege: That's just a concept and I don't have the, nor does the Legion have control over those trees in this design. And so what I would say is, that would be something that would move forward when that particular piece was developed and comes before you. Sacchet: If I may just clarify with staff. When the clinic comes in, is that something does not come in front of us? Al-Jaff: Yes. Sacchet: It will be? Okay.~Because that's one thing I want to be real clear. I mean we have this concept plan and we're asked to recommend approval of the concept between the two, even though only the Legion is the piece that you're focused on and have the details worked out. Ijust want to be real clear that when the clinic happens, we're going to go through the review cycle. Al-Jaff: Absolutely. Sacchet: And we can address that tree aspect at that point. Okay. Now, there is a tree aspect that touches even what you're doing now. There is, like it's drawn on your views as, like that long stretch of trees that at this point it goes along the soccer field. And they're not as spectacular as those oaks, that's a given. And certainly most of those will have to be cut. That's a given. But at the same time I'd like to ask you whether it would be possible, and here we could do it outside the drive aisle. I mean there could possibly be one or two islands where you could preserve a small grouping of those trees that I know it's a long stretch and I don't know whether it would work out, but if there would be one like somewhere on the property line. That could be an area where you could possibly make a small island with saving some of those trees. I think that would be a real nice touch. Possibly... Dan Doege: .. . north ofthe... 42 "','~",; Planning Commission Meeting - February 19,2002 Sacchet: Yes, south of the cut and basically about halfway between where you have that cut going across the two properties. Dan Doege: Between the access drive and the parking lot? Sacchet: Yes. Let's see. Yeah. Right, if you move your finger up about, little more. Little more. Little more. Little more. Yeah, that's where they are. Dan Doege: This island right here? Sacchet: No. They're on the property line. I don't think over by the island you're going to have much trees, but on the property line. q Dan Doege: That's something that I guess when we get to the construction we can certainly look at seeing what is savable. . .and such. Sacchet: Yeah, and if the trees are good and healthy there too. I mean that's.. . Dan Doege: ...they're not going to be damaged and such. That is certainly something we can look at and work with staff to see what can be saved. Blackowiak: Again, that's a Jill question. Sacchet: Okay. Alright, that was my question for you. Thanks for addressing that. Blackowiak: And I guess I don't have any. Oh, I do have one question I guess of the applicant. Dan Doege: Well they're talking about further between the two parking 10ts...I should clarify on your last point. If the sidewalk goes in, the north/south sidewalk, that reduces the landscape area that might allow that. Sacchet: I'm aware of that. Dan Doege: Okay. And so anyways... Blackowiak: Okay, thank you. And I just had one question. You went through some conditions. Are there any others that you have issue with or are you comfortable with the conditions as stated? With the exception that you already. Dan Doege: Right. As stated, I believe the conditions start on page 16. Blackowiak: Correct, for the subdivision we have 1 through 18. Dan Doege: Those are.. .I brought up everything that we have. Blackowiak: Okay, and then the site plan we have I through 35 now. We added a couple. Dan Doege: Right. And we're also in agreement that we do need to get together with the property owner to the south and also the clinic and come up with written agreements that we... 43 Planning Commission Meeting - February 19,2002 Blackowiak: Cross access, right. Okay, great. Good for you Shannin. Anyone else from the Legion like to get up and say anything at this point? No? Oh come on up. We're a friendly bunch. Tom Bazinsky: My name's Tom Bazinsky. I'm... Blackowiak: Okay, could you just grab the mic and, there you go. Tom Bazinsky: I hate these things. Blackowiak: Oh I know. Tom Bazinsky: My name is Tom Bazinsky. I'm President of the Housing Corporation and if the Board has any questions as far as the operation of the Legion Club, what we intend to do, I'd be glad to answer those questions. I think Dan Doege did a good job relaying our objections and our accent to all of the issues that the staff came up with so we don't have anything. Basically the only issue we had was with the access from Great Plains Boulevard over to the Legion property and I think we've pretty much agreed on what we can do there. Blackowiak: And the location. Tom Bazinsky: If you have any questions as far as the operation, what we're going to do, what we have planned. Blackowiak: I would assume, and I guess I'm assuming, similar operation to what you have right now but larger obviously. Tom Bazinsky: Yeah, the Legion club itself. Blackowiak: Is still serving food. Tom Bazinsky: The bar and stuff will stay the same. Blackowiak: Meetings. Tom Bazinsky: We're still going to be serving breakfast. It's the best breakfast in town. One thing that the club is going to bring to the city itself is the banquet facility. You know the city has a real need for that and that's part of what we're proposing to do. So we think it's going to really enhance what goes on around town. We're going to be able to draw more people in to different functions that we have and also to the different businesses around the neighborhood. The plan that we've got, it's taken a lot of work. We've been working on this thing for 6 years, okay. Blackowiak: We keep hearing about it. We just, nice to finally see something. Tom Bazinsky: And everybody thought it was a rumor but no, we've been working on it for 6 years. This is the evolution that it's come to now. Park Nicollet is a very compatible business with us. Their business hours, peak business hours are totally different from our's. The one thing, one of the reasons why it took so long was the access off of Great Plains Boulevard. Closing that down totally eliminated any retail that you could look at. And Park Nicollet's been very, they've been just wonderful people to 44 Planning Corrunission Meeting - February 19,2002 work with. You know they've given us just about everything we've asked of them so I think it's, once it's aid and done it's going to be a great project. Blackowiak: Okay, thank you. Sacchet: Can I ask you a question? Blackowiak: Oh sure. Sacchet: Well I figure the horse shoe won't be there anymore but that's not my question. The question is, and it's kind of a detail. In the condition it says you're going to have to apply for a liquor license. You already have one. Tom Bazinsky: We already have one, yes. Sacchet: But they can't be transferred to a new building, is that why there's a condition? Tom Bazinsky: I think because the address may change, you have to re-apply. I'm not quite sure but I think that's probably has something to do with it. Blackowiak: Just a formality. Tom Bazinsky: Don? Don's here. If our Club Manager was here, he could answer that. He went back to doing his job. We already have a liquor license, it's just going to have to be moved to a different address. Dave Wagner: Good evening. My name's Dave Wagner. I'm a resident of Chanhassen for 11 years and Ijust want to say that these gentlemen here tonight that represent the Legion, and the Legion's been in this town for a long time and I don't know another organization in this community that has done such a wonderful job of donating money and doing such a great contribution to society than the American Legion. And I would love to ask you folks to take that in a great consideration into anything that these gentlemen and the club was asking for. Thank you. Sacchet: Okay. That answers it, thank you. Blackowiak: Okay. Blackowiak: Okay, thanks. Alright with that I will open the public hearings so if anyone else would like to step up to the microphone and make a comment, please feel free to do so. Pat Hallisey: I'm Pat Hallisey. I'm the managing partner of the partnership that owns the strip center just next door to the existing Legion Club. And I guess the first thing I'd like to say is we are really looking forward to this development. We've enjoyed being neighbors with the Legion for these last 15 years and we look forward to the addition of Park Nicollet so we strongly support the development. We also are in favor of the agreement that the 3 property owners have worked out regarding the location of the new access and the condition number 34 attached to the recommendations. Regarding the timing, it's not my business but I'm going to comment on it. It really makes no difference to us when that access is moved. We know it's going to be moved for 15 years. We've known that some day it was going to be moved. but it just makes sense to me in my judgment that these people are in there. They're operating. 45 Planning Commission Meeting - February 19,2002 They're using that access now. They've been using it for a long, long time. 1 don't see why they can't continue to use that access and the property that they have to drive on until the new building is built and the old one comes down. Just makes common sense to me. And they're using it now. Why not just let them use it as is until such time as they need to build a new building there. I guess those are my comments. Blackowiak: Alright, thank you. Dan Doege: Usually at this point it's better for me not to say anything because everything seems to be going very well but I would be really remiss if I did not put this on the table because Sharmin worked so hard on this model of our building and we've never, ever had a planner do a model for an architect before. Blackowiak: She must really like you guys. Dan Doege: She did such a nice job, I want to thank her. Blackowiak: I said Sharmin must really like you guys I guess. Dan Doege: I think she's tired of seeing us. Bob Savard: Good evening. My name is Bob Savard. I live at 880 Marsh Drive. I guess I'm the closest residential neighborhood to this development too. And as always, in the past, my concern has been the traffic on Lake Drive. What's going to happen with the, this is a new concern. What's happening with. the storm water runoff? Because as it is now I believe the storm water runoff from the parking lot for the Citgo gas station and that development goes right through my back yard. And thirdly, traffic. What will happen if there is no access from this development to Great Plains Boulevard? I don't see that traffic now as a neighbor, but I will certainly see it as, especially since there will be no left hand. Help me. I don't understand this very well, but the only left hand entrance would be from Lake Drive East. Blackowiak: Correct. Bob Savard: And I'm very concerned about that so. And the trees. Sacchet: Thank you. Bob Savard: I love the trees. I look at the trees and I look at the development across the street from my house, and the backdrop is trees. And I'm absolutely positive that those trees are a sound buffer between my home and my neighbors homes and Highway 5. Over the last 8 years I've seen 50 acres worth of trees disappear in the development of Villages on the Ponds. I was very concerned about that but you know be that as it may, they cut them all down. And now I understand that some of the trees behind the Citgo station are not well. One has disappeared over the last few years and perhaps there is another that needs to be removed. But the remaining trees, I'd hate to see them go. Thank you. Blackowiak: Okay, thank you. Staff, could Ijust get any comments about runoff. Where does that water go from Citgo right now? I don't know who wants to, Matt is that you? 46 <r. ~ Planning Commission Meeting - February 19,2002 Sweidan: The drainage from Citgo so far it's not been added in the plans. I mean we...see it from the plans right now but overall the. . .development it's going to be conveyed by a stonn sewer system. All of it conveyed to our proposed environmental stonn pond. Blackowiak: Right, so the pond's already there but it will just get bigger to accommodate that. Sweidan: Exactly. And there's an outlet from this existing pond towards a stonn sewer system. Existing stonn sewer system. Blackowiak: And that goes where? Sweidan: To the south. Blackowiak: Okay. Down Marsh or? Sweidan: South of Lake Drive East. Blackowiak: Oh, is it the one that goes down the ravine? Sacchet: So that is his back yard? Blackowiak: No. It goes down the ravine and goes down to. Bob Savard: That is my back yard. Generous: That's from Villages. Blackowiak: That's from Villages. The east of that, if you go down Marsh a little bit. You know how, I live in the neighborhood. You know the poplar trees? Bob Savard: Yeah. Blackowiak: It goes down that ravine. Bob Savard: The access to that ravine runs right through my back yard. It crosses from mine and my neighbor's back yard underneath Marsh Drive. Blackowiak: So it starts there? It doesn't start farther to the east? Sweidan: It's under the street. Blackowiak: Yeah, there's an underground one too. Bob Savard: It crosses underneath the street. The outlet from the pond behind my house crosses between the two lots there and that's underneath Marsh Drive and then continues through the ravine. Blackowiak: The eastern ravine which is the one I'm referring to that's the poplars, yeah. Where they cut those down. Oh yeah, the ones they cut down. 47 Planning Commission Meeting - February 19, 2002 Sweidan: The existing one... Blackowiak: Right. So where does that go? Help me with that. Sweidan: Here there's an outlet that goes to a storm sewer system and it's going underneath it. And there's a 21 inches going through some. Blackowiak: Okay, so maybe it hooks up then to the one that starts in his back yard? Do you know where he's. Saam: At different points. Blackowiak: At different points. Saam: This stuff isn't going. . . Blackowiak: So that's not going to start by him? It will start further down, okay. Okay, good. Thank you. I just want to get that all clarified. Harold Lund: Hi. My name's Harold Lund. I'm also on the Housing Committee and I'm also the Chaplin of Post 580 and as Tom said, there's been a lot of prayers said for our club. I'm a Korean War Veteran and we've done a tremendous amount of stuff forth is community. I was in Chan til '93. I'm a painting contractor. I do a lot of work for the city, but Ijust want to take this time to thank you all for being so patient with us and hopefully my prayers as a Chaplin will be reinforced for our Post 580 in the future of Chanhassen. Thank you. Blackowiak: Thank you. Okay, would anybody else like to make any comments? I don't see anyone else. I will close the public hearing. And it's time for commissioners comments. Before we comment I do want to clarify something with staff please. What is your position on current access to the current Legion property? How long can that stay open? Al-Jaff: Well they will need to use it for as long as the Legion, the existing Legion remains open and we said, one of our recommendations was that that operation continues for as long as the building is under construction. Blackowiak: Right, so. Let's say the new one is opened up. Now what's your feeling? I mean given that they are saying that they would like to have that access. Al-Jaff: We want to see the situation corrected as soon as possible. I mean that access point has always been an issue, and it depends on how fast Villages continues to grow. That's when you're really going to see problems. Traffic generated by Villages on the Pond has not reached it's peak, yes. And once that happens we're going to see problems there. We have no guarantees that the clinic will be there in 18 months. We would like to see them come in as soon as possible, but again there are no guarantees. So we want to see this situation fixed as soon as possible. Sweidan: I had something. MnDot also recommended that to DÚniDÚze as much as we could from the Great Plains Boulevard access. And so we have so far existing two, and we plan to have one so the short we can make it in time, which would be also like a MnDot to decide too. So that's why we are looking just you know for one access. 48 Planning Commission Meeting - February 19,2002 Blackowiak: Right, I understand that. I'mjust curious as to what your feelings are on the time line. You know how long can they have that second Great Plains access after they move into their second building, and I guess that's kind of. AI-Jaff: And we understand that they have to have it for, during the construction. Blackowiak: During construction obviously. AI-J aff: And we definitely want to separate construction traffic from business traffic. Blackowiak: Business traffic, sure. Okay. Alright, thanks. Well we'll have our comments now. Anybody? Dan Doege: Can I add one thing? Blackowiak: Well. Sacchet: Things are going well. Blackowiak: If you really think it's going to help your case. Dan Doege: Well I was just going to clear up something you just asked. Blackowiak: Okay. Come up quickly. Dan Doege: Okay. real quickly our point is we, our issue is not one that we care when that driveway gets developed. We would develop that driveway whenever the city wants us to develop that driveway. My only point of contention is the roadway connecting the driveway and us, okay. Blackowiak: Right. Okay. Alright, commissioners. Comments. Craig, anything to say? Claybaugh: If I'm understanding correctly, once the construction is done with the new Legion location, their primary access is going to be off Lake Drive, is that correct? AI-J aff: Correct. That's a full access. Claybaugh: At that point they no longer, they're going to tear down the existing Legion that's in place now and no longer need that patron, separate patron access off of Great Plains and you'd like that situation rectified at that time. Is that correct? AI-Jaff: Correct. Claybaugh: Okay. That would be my only comment that I guess I share staffs recommendation. I don't see any reason that that couldn't take place at that time table. Blackowiak: Okay, thanks. Deb, any comments? 49 Planning Commission Meeting - February 19, 2002 Kind: I'm okay with doing the southem drive aisle with Phase II. I don't see any need that it needs to be done right now. Overall I think it's really an attractive building and I'm very excited to see the improvement on that comer. And the idea of partnering with Park Nicollet just seems perfect. Just perfect for a joint use of the parking and is neat and I would like to see more of that done in our community. I think it's a great project. Blackowiak: Okay, thanks. Any comments down here? LuAnn? Sidney: No. I like the project. The building is really a refreshing change from a lot of the architecture we've seen recently and I think it will be a really good addition to that site. And I agree with Deb's comments about what she said. Kind: About the drive aisle thing? Sidney: Yep. Drive aisle, thank you. Blackowiak: Alright. Sacchet: Well first of all I want to thank you. I mean you thanked us. You thanked staff but I think it's also appropriate to thank you because it's refreshing to hear from staff that you worked well together. I wish we would hear that from every applicant. And I think it's a great project. I think it's beautiful. It's a great thing. It's really wonderful, and I want to compliment you on that too. Now as you've already gathered from my previous concerns, I'm concerned about those trees. I think they're very important. I think they're much more important than the drive aisle and they're more important than that sidewalk thing. I also would like staff to verify the thing about the Colorado Spruce. At this point I'm in total favor of this whole project. I think it's a great project as I said. However, I would like to clarify a couple ofthings. For one thing there's some redundancy in the conditions, like 14, IS, 16 of subdivision are identical to 14, 15 and 33 of site plan, so I don't know whether they need to be both places. .. .no signs are being approved with this, are we doing here? AI-Jaff: Two directional signs are being approved. Sacchet: Well we say applicant must obtain a sign pennit prior to erecting any signage on site. AI-Jaff: Correct. And these are handled administratively. Sacchet: Okay. The reason why I want to be real clear about that is because in the blueprints there are, signs are actually drawn. The free standing ones so I want to be clear. Are we doing anything at this point about signs or not? AI-Jaff: You're only looking at the Legion site. You are approving the signs that are on the Legion site. Sacchet: Weare approving those. AI-Jaff: But only on the Legion site which is Lot 2, Block 1. Sacchet: Okay, I think that needs to be clarified. Then there's a little bit of redundancy like from the, what's the second piece? The site plan review, condition number 17 is repeated in condition number 20. Then here comes the juicy part, 28, 9 and 32. 28, the closing the access. I do believe that if. 50 Planning Conunission Meeting - February 19,2002 Kind: ...doesn't close the access. Sacchet: Yes, the connecting access drive between the two developments as shown on the plans should be constructed to the south property line of the site concurrently with the construction of the Legion site. Isn't that a condition that says they have to pull it over to. AI-Jaff: That condition. Sacchet: Which one is the condition that says they need to pull it over to Great Plains? Kind: She handed it out tonight. Sacchet: That's the extra one? AI-J aff: The condition you just read connects those two sites. The Citgo site. Sacchet: That connection, okay. Okay. So that one, okay. So we're talking about 34. I personally feel very strongly. even though I'm not supposed to feel up here, excuse me. I'm very clear, let me rephrase this. It's an internal joke, bear with me. I personally am very clear that the benefit of not doing that connection to Great Plains far outweighs putting it in. Because if we don't put it in now, we can ask for those significant trees to remain there. Even the ones that most likely will not be there, like that one that is pretty much on the comer of the building. Of the clinic. So I would actually like to specifically put a condition on it at this point that these significant trees are not cut.. .as part of this initial step. That we address that in it's entirety when the clinic comes in. Now I understand the tree is already cut that is in the driveway going to the connection to the Citgo station. That's a no brainer. I mean that tree has to make room, and it's reasonable. I also believe that I would not insist on the sidewalk piece going up there. I mean if people want to go on foot, they can walk through the parking lot. That's not a big deal. A sidewalk would be nice but it's not necessary. I think it's much more important to build in an island, if at all it works out. If the trees there happen to be worth it and all. I mean work with staff on that, but that we are very specific in terms of requesting this gets considered. And if at all possible put in that there's an island off that strip of trees, about on the property line between the two sites. Let's see, what else? That's it. That's my comments. Blackowiak: Alright, thank you. Yeah, I'll be very brief. I think it's a nice plan. I think that the access agreement can be worked out. I'm not so worried about when that driveway gets closed. I agree that we should probably not pave any more than we have to, especially over that Lot 1, Block \. Let's just wait to see what develops. The sidewalk, I don't know if I necessarily think it should be right in the middle of Phase 1. but I do think it's important. Especially if we're talking a clinic. There might be times when people might be there for several hours and it would be nice to have the opportunity to get them from the parking lot out to Lake Drive, so I think we should really consider a trail or a path at some point. or a sidewalk I guess we can call it. Ijust don't know if it's right in the center of Phase 1 so I'm not sure about that. Otherwise 1 like the proposal. The building looks nice with a few little color changes on the accent pieces 1 think we're going to have a great property, so thanks. Sacchet: One more detail. Blackowiak: Okay. one more. 51 Planning Commission Meeting - February 19,2002 Sacchet: Just one more. The access from Great Plains with the old Legion building. Could there be a compromise that when the old Legion's not being used that it's closed off kind of like to prevent people from making left turns going in there? Not necessarily do the whole construction with making curb and but like put a barricade type of thing on that exit at that point. I mean I think that would solve the concern for the safety. BIackowiak: Well I think we just need to direct staff to work that out. I mean to work with the Legion. To work with Citgo. To make the best and safe as possible access choices when the construction is completed so I don't think we need to get any more detail than that. So with that I will ask for a motion. Sacchet: Well Madam Chair. I make the motion that the Planning Commission recommends approval of Subdivision #2002-3 for the replat of 5.58 acres into 2 lots as shown on the plans dated received January 15, 2002, subject to the following conditions 1 through 18. BIackowiak: Okay, there's been a motion. Is there a second? Sidney: Second. BIackowiak: It's been moved and seconded. Kind: Uli,18? BIackowiak: Yes, it's really 18, Start on page 16. Go through page 18. Kind: Thank you. Sacchet moved, Sidney seconded that the Planning Commission recommends approval of Subdivision #2002-3 for the replat of 5.58 acres into 2 lots as shown on the plans dated received January 15, 2002, subject to the following conditions: 8. Calculations shall demonstrate that all downstream facilities are adequate to accommodate storm water from the proposed development. 9. 10. The applicant shall demonstrate that the property owners to the east have granted permission for grading to occur on their property and that they have agreed to combine the storm water ponds for both sites. 11. 12. Drainage and utility easements shall be provided over all storm water ponding areas. 13. Silt fence shall be provided in areas where sediment may otherwise be carried off. site. 14. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. 15. All upland areas disturbed as a result of construction activities shall be immediately restored with seed and disc-mulched, covered with a wood-fiber blanket or sodded 52 Planning Commission Meeting - February 19,2002 within two weeks of completion of each activity in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook. 1. Based on the proposed developed area of approximately 5.58 acres, the water quality fees associated with this project are $32,972; the water quantity fees are approximately $24,329. The applicant will be credited for water quality where NURP basins are provided to treat runoff from the site. This will be determined upon review of the stonn water calculations. At this time, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $57,301. 8. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g. Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Army Corps of Engineers) and comply with their conditions of approval. 16. Prior to final plat approval. a professional civil engineer registered in the state of Minnesota must sign all plans. 17. The pond is required to be designed to National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) standards. 18. Cross-access easements for the shared driveway accesses must be obtained and recorded against the lots. 19. Staff will work with the applicant's engineer to revise stonn water calculations. Prior to final platting, stonn sewer design data will need to be submitted for staff review. The stonn sewer will have to be designed for a lO-year. 24-hour stonn event. Drainage and utility easements will need to be dedicated on the final plat over the public stonn drainage system including ponds, and drainage swales, up to the 100-year flood level. The minimum easement width shall be 20 feet wide. Emergency overflows from all stonnwater ponds will also be required on the construction plans. 20. Minimum 20-foot wide easements will be required over the public portion of the utility lines. 21. Each newly created lot will be subject to City sanitary sewer and water hook up charges at the time of building permit issuance. The 2002 trunk utility hook up charges are $1,383 per unit for sanitary sewer and $1,802 per unit for water. 22. Public utility improvements will be required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed construction plans and specifications will be required at the time of final platting. The applicant will also be required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the fonn of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies must be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, Department of Health, Watershed District, Carver County, MnDOT, etc. 23. Park and Trail fees shall be paid at the rate in force upon application. The current fees are as follows; Legion Site (Lot 2): At the time of plat: Park Fee: $3,180 53 Planning Commission Meeting - February 19,2002 Trail Fee: At the time of building permit: Park Fee: Trail Fee: $1,060 $6,360 $2,120 Park Nicollet Site (Lot 1): At the time of plat: Park Fee: Trail Fee: At the time of building permit: Park Fee: Trail Fee: $5,310 $1,770 $10,620 $3,540 24. The applicant shall enter into a development contract with the city and provide the necessary financial securities as required. 25. Any retaining wall that exceeds 3 feet in height shall be designed by a Registered Engineer. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously 5 to O. Blackowiak: I need another motion please. Sacchet: Madam Chair. I make the motion that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the site plan review #2002-2 for the American Legion Club Post 580 as shown on the site plan received January 15, 2002, subject to the following conditions 1 through 35 with fixings. Condition number 1. Applicant must obtain sign permits. Now, staff help me out. You said that we're actually approving the Legion specific signs here? AI-Jaff: Correct. Sacchet: So should we say that? Al-Jaff: Well you're approving the site plan for the Legion. You're not reviewing anything that has to do with the clinic. Sacchet: No, I'm talking about the Legion site. Al-Jaff: Correct. Kind: They're on the plans. AI-Jaff: And these are the plans. Sacchet: So if we say as the plans, that means we're approving them. AI-Jaff: If you feel more comfortable saying the Legion signs. The American Legion signs. Sacchet: I believe that should be clarified. Sidney: We're just on the American Legion though. 54 Planning Commission Meeting - February 19, 2002 Sacchet: Yeah. But it still seems to contradict that then we say they must obtain sign permits when. AI-Jaff: Oh, everybody has to obtain sign permits before they put up. Sacchet: They still have to do that? Generous: They provide the detailed information. Sacchet: They still have to do it, alright. Al-Jaff: Yes. Sacchet: That's what I wanted to hear. So the condition stands as is. I'd like to strike out condition 17, because I believe it's stated in condition 20. 17 says the minimum rock construction entrance must be 75 feet and in 20 we say again, all of the proposed rock construction entrances must be 75 feet. Is that okay with engineering? Sweidan: Yes. Sacchet: Okay. So that one goes. And then the silt fence shall be removed when construction is completed. We can't go without that one. That's in condition number 20 also after we talk about silt fence. Now, number 31. The sidewalk. I'd like to take that off, but I'd like to say that the applicant shall work with staff to place a tree island on the property line between the southern drive and the connection between the two parking lots. ~: Blackowiak: Uli, can I make a suggestion? Not applicant will work but how about explore with staff. Sacchet: Will explore with staff. I'd like it a little bit stronger than exploring here. I mean if it totally doesn't make sense, it doesn't make sense; Blackowiak: Right so, but if you're putting a condition that they put one in and if it doesn't make sense. Sacchet: Alright, explore. That'd be good. I trust them. Al-Jaff: I need clarification. So let's assume that they couldn't save the trees. do you want the sidewalk or do you want things to remain as is? Is it an either or? Sacchet: Yeah. That gives them an incentive. Blackowiak: No. I want a sidewalk somewhere though. Claybaugh: Yeah, I agree. Blackowiak: You said either or. Sacchet: I mean if they can't do the trees, then they have to do the sidewalk. Blackowiak: No. 55 Planning Commission Meeting - February 19, 2002 Claybaugh: No, we want a sidewalk regardless. Blackowiak: Somewhere. Whether it's on this lot or the other lot, I want it over inbetween maybe. Sacchet: But we're not talking about the other one. Blackowiak: Maybe inbetween the two lots. I don't know. Let's not get too muddled down. Sacchet: But the way I would put it is, either or. Either a sidewalk or the tree island should take place. That not going to fly? Claybaugh: No. Sacchet: Alright. Blackowiak: I would just say, you know let's explore that, yeah. Sacchet: Let's explore. Okay. Applicant shall explore with staff the possibilities of having a tree island on the property line, as well as putting a sidewalk. Blackowiak: As well as placement options for the sidewalk. Sacchet: Placement options for sidewalk, which means we could be on the clinic side. Claybaugh: Possibly realign. Blackowiak: Sure. Sacchet: Right. Condition 32. Applicant shall work with staff to minimize impact and save as many trees as possible. Well, I would like to go one step further and say that that grove of significant trees to the southwest should remain. Should remain as much, well there's really no reason why they couldn't remain at this point tiI the clinic comes in. Okay. I think that should be clear condition. Claybaugh: Until future plans develop. Sacchet: Yeah, til future plans develop for the site and it will be reviewed at that time. At this point that should be preserved. And then condition 34. Applicant shall be responsible for closing off the existing Legion west access, and I would say with a, or work with staff how to temporary close it off. I mean the idea is that you put on one of these street ends here have a barricade at that point. Oh, you don't like that huh? Kind: Madam Chair, point of clarification. The closing off of the existing Citgo gas station. Sacchet: It should be the Legion. Kind: No. No, the Citgo one. .. Blackowiak: When they combine. 56 Planning Commission Meeting - February 19,2002 Kind: The right-inlright-out at Citgo will be going away and this applicant will be responsible for closing that off. Sacchet: The Citgo is going away, not the Legion one. Blackowiak: Well the Legion's eventually going to go away too. Kind: We're going to leave that open while the Legion's there. Sacchet: Alright. Claybaugh: But when they complete the new construction but when they develop the Phase II over there. would the city be looking at allowing them to use that for a construction entrance? Otherwise all the construction activity is going to come through the new entrance on Phase I. Al-Jaff: Well, construction traffic will come through Lake Drive. Claybaugh: Once for Phase II. The future Phase II. Al-Jaff: Because this one is right-inlright-out only. Sacchet: Yeah, and my concern is that it's the left turn. So it's increasing traffic. 1 think we have a safety concern here then. Claybaugh: .. .trying to address... Blackowiak: That is extending the curb. That's what's going to happen. It's addressed in the condition. Extend it from along Great Plains Boulevard. And extending the median. Claybaugh: Sharmin, I was thinking in terms of Phase II in the future and I wanted to see the Legion entrance once the existing Legion is taken down, have it barricaded. Just because it's not used in the interim until it's developed as Phase II, then I think that needs to be set up for right-inlright-out for construction equipment. Otherwise they're going to tear up Phase I. But I do think in the interim, to discourage that use, that that should be barricaded temporarily until Phase II is ripe for development for construction equipment. Kind: Okay. how's this motion going? Sacchet: Yeah, !think... Blackowiak: Yeah, we're getting too much discussion here. Sacchet: Alright, I think I came clear. I think I don't want this to be closed off at this point because it means going to monkey around with that area and we don't know what's going to happen on the clinic. Blackowiak: But they will, on number 34 they are ultimately responsible for closing that. Sacchet: They are responsible? 57 Planning Commission Meeting - February 19,2002 Blackowiak: Yes. That is part ofthe agreement. Sacchet: So we, basically we're saying they're responsible. We don't say when they do it. Blackowiak: Right, exactly. Sacchet: Oh, then we leave it in. Should we specify that this shall be done later? Blackowiak: No. No. Sacchet: No? Blackowiak: They're responsible. Staff can take care of it. You've got to trust them. Sacchet: Okay. It's in your hands guys. Alright, that's my motion. Kind: I'll second that but 1 have a few friendly amendments. Sacchet: Please. Kind: Let's flip back here to page 19. Condition number 61 would like to change the wording. Concurrent with the building permit, a detailed lighting plan, including fixture styles. meeting city standards shall be submitted. Just for clarification. Sacchet: Accepted. Blackowiak: Okay. Kind: Number 20, I would like to reword the beginning of that, just to clean it up and make it a condition to, the sentence should start off, a silt fence shall be added. Sacchet: Accepted. Kind: Number 28. 1 don't know how you left this. Sacchet: I actually left that one alone. Kind: Here's my idea for rewording that one. Access onto Great Plains Boulevard from future Lot I, Block I shall be restricted to a right-inlright-out only. The connecting access drive between the two developments as shown on the plan should be constructed along the south property line of the site with the construction of Phase II. Sacchet: Fine. Blackowiak: Okay, so that's accepted. Kind: 1 think we addressed the sidewalk stuff already. That's it. 58 Planning Commission Meeting - February 19, 2002 Claybaugh: Actually if I understood how it was submitted, it addressed my concern. That access is going to remain open correct? Blackowiak: Yep. Claybaugh: I do, I don't know if it's appropriate to ask staff a point then at this point or not. Blackowiak: You know what, we're kind of done here. Okay. It's been moved and seconded. Sacchet moved, Kind seconded that the Planning Commission recommends approval of Site Plan Review #2002-2 for the American Legion Club Post 580 as shown on the site plan received January 15, 2002, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant must obtain a sign permit prior to erecting any signage on site. Provide a detailed sign plan for review and approval. The signage shall meet the following criteria: a. Monument signage shall be subject to the monument standards in the sign ordinance. b. Wall signs are permitted on the southwest elevation only. The sign area shall meet standards set in the sign ordinance. c. All signs require a separate permit. d. The signage will have consistency throughout the development and add an architectural accent to the building. e. Consistency in signage shall relate to color, size, materials, and heights. f. Back-lit individual letter signs are permitted. g. Individual letters may not exceed 2 feet in height. h. Only the name and logo of the business occupying the building will be permitted on the sign. 2. All roof top equipment shall be screened from views. Any kitchen vents shall be concealed or painted the same color as the roof. 26. 3. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the city and provide the necessary financial securities. 4. Fire Marshal conditions: a. Two additional fire hydrants will be required. Contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location of hydrants. b. A IO-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e, street lamps, trees. bushes, shrubs, Qwest, Xcel Energy, cable TV and transfonner boxes. This is to ensure 59 Planning Commission Meeting - February 19,2002 that the hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. c. When fire protection including fire apparatus access roads and water supplies for fire protection is required to be installed, such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction. Pursuant to 1997 Uniform Fire code Section 901.3. d. Comply with the Chanhassen Fire DepartmentlFire Prevention Division regarding premise identification. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire DepartmentlFire Prevention Division Policy #29-1992. e. Comply with water service installation policy for commercial and industrial buildings. Pursuant to Inspection Division Water Service Installation Policy #34-1993. Copy enclosed. f. Comply with the Chanhassen Fire DepartmentlFire Prevention Division Policy regarding maximum allowed size of domestic water on a combination domesticlfire sprinkler supply line. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire DepartmentlFire Prevention Division Policy #36-1994. Copy enclosed. g. Comply with the Chanhassen Fire DepartmentlFire Prevention Division policy regarding notes being included on all site plans. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire DepartmentlFire Prevention Division Policy #4-1991. h. "No parking fire lane" signs and yellow curbing will be required. Contact Chanhassen fire Marshal for exact location of signs and curbing to be painted yellow. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire DepartmentlFire Prevention Division Policy #6-1991 and Section 904- 1997 Uniform Fire Code. 5. The applicant shall change the color of the accent medallions to a more contrasting color. 6. Concurrent with the building pennit. a detailed lighting plan including fixture styles, meeting city standards shall be submitted. 7. Building Official's conditions: i. The building is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system. j. The plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. k. Demolition pennits must be obtained form the Inspections Division before demolishing any structures. I. Detailed occupancy related code requirements will be reviewed when complete plans are submitted. It is evident however that the assembly space in the basement must be of one- hour fire-resistive construction and the exits as designed do not comply with the code. m. The proposed building on Lot 1 was not reviewed for building code compliance. n. The owner and or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review and pennit procedures. 8. Applicant shall increase buffer yard plantings to meet minimum requirements. Spruce trees shall be added to the east of the trash enclosure and the loading area. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted to the City prior to city council approval. 9. All parking lot landscape islands must have a minimum width of 10 feet. 60 · Planning Commission Meeting - February 19.2002 · 10. · 11. · · 12. · 13. · 14. · 15. · · 16. · 17. 27. · · · · .. · · The applicant and/or contractor shall notify the City upon encountering any existing drain tile on the site. The City will determine whether or not the drain tile can be abandoned or relocated. All construction vehicles shall access the site from Lake Drive North and not Great Plains Boulevard. Rock construction entrances shall be installed and maintained until the site is paved with a bituminous surface. Haul routes, if necessary, shall be pre-approved by the City. The applicant will be required to maintain haul routes and clean the streets of any dirt and mud accumulated from vehicles tracking. Any damage to City streets, curbs or other public facilities will be the responsibility of the applicant. Private utility easements will be required for the storm sewer line that runs from Lot 2 to Lot I. Add the following City of Chanhassen Detail Plate Nos. 1002, 1004, 1006,2101,2109, 2201-2205,3101,3106-3108,5204,5207,5214,5234 and 5300. Prior to final plat approval, a professional civil engineer registered in the state of Minnesota must sign all plans. The pond is required to be designed to National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) standards. Cross-access easements for the shared driveway accesses must be obtained and recorded against the lots. The applicant must obtain a permit from MnDOT for grading in the right-of-way. Staff will work with the applicant's engineer to revise storm water calculations. Prior to final platting, storm sewer design data will need to be submitted for staff review. The storm sewer will have to be designed for a IO-year, 24-hour storm event. Drainage and utility easements will need to be dedicated on the final plat over the public storm drainage system including ponds, and drainage swales, up to the 100-year flood level. The minimum easement width shall be 20 feet wide. Emergency overflows from all stormwater ponds will also be required on the construction plans. 28. A silt fence shall be added around the east side of storm water pond grading limits of the site. The silt fence must be Type II. All of the proposed rock construction entrances must be lengthened to 75 feet as per City Detail Plate No. 5301. The silt fence shall be removed upon completion of the project. 29. Any off-site grading will require easements from the appropriate property owner. 30. Minimum 20-foot wide easements will be required over the public portion of the utility lines. 61 Planning Commission Meeting - February 19,2002 31. Installation of the private utilities for the site will require pennits and inspections through the City's Building Department. 32. Each newly created lot will be subject to City sanitary sewer and water hook up charges at the time of building pennit issuance. The 2002 trunk utility hook up charges are $1,383 per unit for sanitary sewer and $1,802 per unit for water. 33. Public utility improvements will be required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed construction plans and specifications will be required at the time of final platting. The applicant will also be required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. Pennits from the appropriate regulatory agencies must be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, Department of Health, Watershed District, Carver County, MnDOT, etc. 34. On the utility plan: - Revise catch basin nos. 2, 3, 4, and 7 to catch basin manhole nos. 2, 3, 4, and 7. - Revise sheet title to "Preliminary Utility Plan". - Shift the watennain toward the southeast corner adjacent to the curb and call the fittings. - Show the utilities easement. - Add a storm sewer schedule. - Change the type of public watermain from DIP to PVC C-900. - Show the proposed pipe slope, class and length of the storm sewer. - Under the Sewer and Water Notes, add, "All sanitary services shall be 6" PVC SDR26. 35. On the grading plan: - Show all existing and proposed easements. - Show the benchmark used for the site survey. - Add a note "clean existing pond after pond enlargement grading is finished". - Revise sheet title to "Preliminary Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plan". - Add a note for removing existing bituminous and close off the existing (west) American Legion access. 36. Access onto Great Plains Boulevard from Lot 1, Block 1 shall be restricted to a right-in/right-out only. The connecting access drive between the two developments as shown on the plans should be constructed along the south property line of the site concurrently with the construction of Phase II. 37. Obtain a liquor license from the City. 38. The existing Legion building shall be removed no later than 60 days after receipt of the Certificate of Occupancy for the new building. 39. The applicant will work with staff to explore the possibility of having a tree island on the property line as well as placement options for a sidewalk. 62 Planning Commission Meeting - February 19,2002 40. The applicant shall work with staff to minimize impact and save the significant stand of trees located in the southwest corner of the site until future plans are developed. , 41. Park and Trail fees shall be paid at the rate in force upon application. The current fees are as follows: Legion Site (Lot 2): At the time of plat: Park Fee: Trail Fee: At the time of building permit: Park Fee: Trail Fee: $3,180 $1,060 $6,360 $2,120 · · · Park Nicollet Site (Lot 1): At the time of plat: Park Fee: Trail Fee: At the time of building permit: Park Fee: $5,310 $1,770 $10,620 · 42. The applicant shall be responsible for closing off the existing Citgo Gas Station (west) access, removing the existing bituminous, extending the curb along Great Plains Boulevard (east side) and extending the median located across from the existing Legion curb cut to eliminate left turns. · 43. Recycling space shall be provided for all new buildings. The area of the recycling space must be dedicated at the rate specified in Minnesota State Building Code (MSBC) 1300.4700 Subp. 5. The applicant should demonstrate the required area will be provided in addition to the space required for other solid waste collection space. Recycling space and other solid waste collection space should be contained within the same enclosure. " · .~ All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously 5 to O. . Blackowiak: We muddled through it. Thank you very much for coming and staying. Okay, and this does go to City Council on March 11th. Thank you. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: ~ Blackowiak: Before I go on, would somebody like to note the minutes. . Sacchet: Oh yes, my weasel hunt. Just to put it on the record, on page, bear with me. It's not going to take long. In my customary hunt for weasels I did find, there's a lot of feeling in there. Not too many weasels. There's one sort of weasel. On page 73, on the bottom. I'm talking about the bridge across Highway 5. It's not the jumping heart bridge. It's the shopping cart bridge. It looks like a shopping cart. I couldn't quite figure out why it would be a jumping heart. This was a funny one. . ~ Blackowiak: Okay. Minutes are noted. .. 63