Loading...
Admin Section ADMINISTRATIVE SECTION ' Letter to G & T Trucking Company dated July 19, 1990. Letter to Michael Dwyer dated July 19, 1990. Photos from the Fourth of July Celebration. Memo from Scott Harr dated July 16, 1990. Letter to Jacie Hurd dated July 19, 1990. ' Letter to Bill and Vicki Goers dated July 19, 1990. Letter to Steve Kern dated July 23, 1990. ' Letter to Henry Griner dated July 23, 1990. Letter from Elliott Knetsch dated July 17, 1990. Letter from Sheriff Wallin dated July 16, 1990. ' Letter to C. E. Van Eeckhout dated July 30, 1990. Letter from C. E. Van Eeckhout dated July 19, 1990. ' Letter from Gary Ehret dated July 2, 1990. Letter from CH2M Hill dated July 17, 1990. ' Letter from Springsted dated July 12, 1990. Letter to Harvey Swenson dated July 19, 1990. Letter from Gary Fuchs dated July 3, 1990. ' Letter from Earl Gnan and Alice Evans dated July 19, 1990. Letter from Gary Fuchs dated July 27, 1990. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Annual Report for 1989 dated July, 1990. ' Letter to Joel Katz, MnDOT dated July 27, 1990. Memo from Todd Wichman, BRW, dated July 10, 1990. ' Letter from Terrance J. Kucera, City of Chaska dated July 25, 1990. t Memo from Dave Hempel dated August 2, 1990. Letter to Ed Willson dated August 7, 1990. 1 Quarterly Report for Chanhassen Curbside Recycling Program dated July 24, 1990. ' Letter from Tim and Lorie Glaros dated August 2,. 1990. ' Letter from Andrea Dummer dated August 1, 1990. Letter from Property Owners on White Dove Drive dated August 6, 1990. ' Memo to Todd Hoffman dated August 7, 1990. HRA Accounts Payable. Letter from 1991 International Special Olympics Games dated August ' 1, 1990. Memo from Paul Krauss dated August 3, 1990. Memo to Dept. Heads and All City Employees dated August 8, 1990. I 1 . I CITYOF CHANHASSEN 11 11411111! 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 July 19, 1990 CERTIFIED Mr. Tom Zwiers G & T Trucking Company 11111 Deuce Road 1 Elko, MN 55020 Dear Mr. Zwiers: On May 24, 1990, I sent you a letter indicating that the City's new Excavation, Mining, Filling and Grading Ordinance was officially ' published and thus in effect. As you are aware, the ordinance provides a 6 month period during which existing operations, such as Moon Valley, must apply for and receive a permit. I sent you a copy of the final ordinance for your review. You were informed that we anticipated a minimum 2 to 3 month time period to be required to complete the review process and to obtain a permit. I requested that you therefore initiate work towards obtaining a . permit as soon as possible so that it may be handled in a timely manner. We are now nearing the end of July and I have not yet been 1 contacted by you pertaining to the satisfaction of ordinance requirements. I am again, recommending that you initiate work on your submittal package immediately and want to express staff's ' willingness to work with you in the process. I am enclosing another copy of our interim use permit application form for your use. Please feel free to contact me if you need assistance. Sin - -ely 1 1 Krauss, AICP 1 Director of Planning Enclosures cc: LOitY Council Planning Commission Gary Warren, City Engineer Roger Knutson, City Attorney 1 CITYOF :)(14404 CHANHASSEN 1 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147• CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612)937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 July 19, 990 CERTIFIED ' Mr. Michael Dwyer, Attorney Mackall, Crouse and Moore 1600 TCF Tower ' 121 South 8th Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 ' Dear Mr. Dwyer: On May 24, 1990, I sent you a letter indicating that the City's new Excavation, Mining, Filling and Grading Ordinance was officially published and thus in effect. As you are aware, the ordinance provides a 6 month period during which existing operations, such as Moon Valley, must apply for and receive a permit. I sent you a 11 copy of the final ordinance for your review. You were informed that we anticipated a minimum 2 to 3 month time period to be required to complete the review process and to obtain a permit. I requested that you therefore initiate work towards obtaining a permit as soon as possible so that it may be handled in a timely manner. We are now nearing the end of July and I have not yet been contacted by you pertaining to the satisfaction of ordinance requirements. I am again, recommending that you initiate work on ' your submittal package immediately and want to express staff's willingness to work with you in the process. I am enclosing another copy of our interim use permit application form for your ' use. Please feel free to contact me if you need assistance. ' Sin ly, ' aul Krauss, AICP Director of Planning Enclosures cc: C' y Council Planning Commission ' Gary Warren, City Engineer Roger Knutson, City Attorney 1 I ■ . .... I . Jr . e I .... . • . ..... _ I _ Will:4Aiii a.t b , ...„ ... , ....., .._., II■ voll■, J .0 .. . • a, r...e."I.-.••• I -) C_) II • " i . -. ___ .2ie ,„% . _ ......_ , 1 :' , gl Z.., #247411 11161"111111N-‘11' — r i ,.. , .,-.... .. 5 0 I 1 . —., 4. • —.....„. , __ s, •--.• ^.../ -.) ..-1 0 .) _1 I ........... ...-,,-. 411"." •0'...ahr...-- . • - 431 11111, I - - ..--•' ... '' .. -,---- .,, .• i WO INS N. or X I , I1*..... 41‘ III.% "Mb , • ... ..: . It. a • I it I • . • -• t. . •■•: . . „,„,•.....A.re'"";!■: I 7".•vt) - ' or, _•-•- ". A • .... Iil . „,.,.,,,., i I - 4 I i 1......^.4M.AA'• - . . If Itip, a, e. 4rz' ...421: .41. ...•, . i ....,ci .0. AL' •_ f 2?' 1. n lo••■• . t .4r t I 'I, „ia t ig, . a i $ rk.".‘f• 4:a..--.,‘, v 1 P • a ' - * t•Illp , ..4 ,tt‘ ' .-114. • 0 4 7,..-,,,,,,"t ; ■-ii " • . gib • :: — ...... i f /7: -4, • 4,7. zl.,,,vot _ ...0,._ _. i...„„,...„ ..... . . ... • ..0 • - , _._ • , . ... ANOMIN■IMM........ ) •.... i I ( 1 • ./.. „ .o. • 4... o 3 0 -Th ..- ... • . 11) ::-.) • . I I • 1 CITY OF Nc 19111111r CHANHASSEN 1 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 MEMORANDUM T0: Don Ashworth, City Manager FROM: Scott Harr , Assistant Public Safety Director DATE: July 16 , 1990 SUBJ : Eurasion Water Milfoil Treatment Of Lake Minnewashta ' On 7-2-90 Lake Restoration Inc. treated a significant infestation' of eurasion water milfoil on Lake Minnewashta. This was paid for by the State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources . Because we have received several calls regarding the application of the material used to treat the lake, I would like to provide you with a brief explaination of the process . Approximately one week prior to the treatment , the State of Minnesota DNR put door hangers on the homes in the area. A short time later , Lake Restoration repeated the process . After the ' treatment , bright orange advisory signs were placed around the area treated. Please keep in mind that the State of Minnesota must issue permits for the application, so the process is watched 1 carefully. I have been advised by both Lake Restoration Inc. and the DNR that the material used to treat the lakes is specific to eurasion 1 water milfoil , and safe. If anyone has any further questions, I will be happy to provide additional data. cc: Don Chmiel , Mayor City Council • 1 i 1 1 tf I „. c CITY o c __.,.,0 a CHANHASSEN "V; n- ,,::' tom = 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 .I :, (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 -- IIJuly 19, 1990 • 1 Jacie Hurd 6695 Horseshoe Curve 1 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Jacie. 1 l want to thank you very much for coming in and sharing your concerns with us regarding the jet ski situation on Lotus Lake. Public Safety will he doing everything we can to help alleviate the situation. As we discussed, we will be 1 getting with the Carver County Sheriff's Department to actively enforce the water surface usage ordinance on all watercraft. In addition, we will ask that they patrol the lake during the more active times, not just during the supper 1 hours or other non active times of day. My recommendation to the City Council will be to enforce. the present ordinance I as it applies to all watercraft including jet skis. Again, as we discussed, it is our position that jet skis are covered under the definition of watercraft and our people would have absolutely no problem issuing a citation under that defi- nition. We also will attempt to enforce the 100 foot out from shore requirement 1 as it applies to these watercrafts. As I indicated to you during our meeting. I would prefer to see license numbers 1 jotted down and the Sheriff's Department notified of an*, violators on the lake. Only under the most extreme safety hazard violations should an attempt be made by a citizen to apprehend the violator. 1 Please don' t hesitate to call if you have any further comments or concerns regarding this matter. IISincerely, I Du Chaffee blic Safety Director 1 JC:cd cc: Don Ashworth, City Manager 1 Scott Harr, Assistant Public Safety Director JoAnn Olsen, Senior Planner II . . .c._0( CITY OF < .4=4„pfr CHANHASSEN • 690 COULTER DRIVE • PO. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 ' r (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 July 19, 1990 Bill & Vicki Goers ' 1990 Harvest Festival Chairpersons 1601 Lyman Blvd. Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Goers, I am in receipt of your letter dated July 9, 1990, regarding permission to park in the no parking area along West 78th Street. Unfortunately, I am not able to grant that request mainly because that portion of West 78th Street adjacent to St. Hubert 's is still considered under the jurisdiction of the Minnesota Depart- ment of Transportation. It would be necessary to receive permission from MnDot to park in the no parking areas along West 78th Street controlled by the state. Quite frankly, I am not at all sure of how that can be done. For parking in no parking areas on city streets, it would be necessary to obtain permission from the City Council . This can be done by sending a letter to me and I , in turn, would schedule a hearing on the matter before the City Council at an upcoming City Council meeting. Again, this is only the case for city streets and for state controlled roadways I do not have an answer other than to contact the Minnesota Department of Transportation in Golden Valley. ' I would be more than happy to have my assistant, Scott Harr, work with you in determining the most appropriate way to handle the parking situation during the function. Scott Harr will be appointed interim Director of Public Safety after I am gone on August 3, 1990. I appreciate your congratulations on my new position with Disney Studios in Bur- bank, California, and I am excited to begin my new career. Please don' t hesi- tate to call me or Scott if you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter. .neerely, im Chaffee ublic Safety Director JC:cd cc: Don Ashworth, City Manager Scott Harr, Assistant Public Safety Director ISt. Huberts Church and School I 1 7707 Great Plains Blvd. Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Telephone:934-9106 II II July 9, 1990 II Mr. Jim Chaffee II Director of Public Safety Chanhassen City Hall 690 Coulter Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 II II Dear Mr. Chaffee, First of all I would like to congratulate you on the recent position offered to you at Disney Land in California. I am sure that the II challenges and opportunities ahead of you will be very exciting for you and your family. Good luck with all of them. I Before you leave I would like to address one issue with regard to a community event - the St. Hubert's Annual Harvest Festival. Specifically, I am interested in a parking exemption along 78th street. IILast year you recommended to the Chairpeople of our festival that we secure a parking exemption for the weekend of the festival. This year II our annual event will take place the weekend of August 25th and 26th. We would greatly appreciate your consideration in this matter - and a granting of the exemption for the weekend of our festival. IIThank you in advance for your consideration, and GOOD LUCK with the challenges that lie ahead in California. II Sincerely, , 9 J Bill and Vicky Goers II 1990 Harvest Festival Chairpersons 1601 Lyman Boulevard IChanhassen, MN 55317 P.S. If it is more convenient, you can indicate your acceptance or rejection of our request at the bottom of this letter. A self IIaddressed envelope is enclosed for your convenience. Thank you. Parking Exemption Granted IParking Exemption Denied II Signature/Date 1 • CITYOF CHANIIASSEN 11 Alt)* -• 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147• CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 ' July 23, 1990 Mr. Steve Kern 6540 Devonshire Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Mr. Kern: ' On June 5, 1990, the City sent you a letter stating that the wetland located in your back yard has been partially filled. After surveying the wetland boundary, it appeared that an area 15 feet deep had been filled below the ordinary high water mark. This 15 foot area must be removed. Since receiving the letter, you have agreed to remove the area of fill below the ordinary high water mark and allow it to return to its natural state as a wetland. I discussed this issue with our Planning Director and confirmed that if the wetland is returned to its natural state the City will no longer require you to proceed with the wetland alteration permit. We will, however, wish to record against your property a document confirming the wetland is protected by the City and cannot be altered without receiving a wetland alteration permit. The document will record an elevation defining the edge of the wetland. ' I would like to visit the site with our Senior Engineering Technician and yourself to stake out the exact area of fill which must be removed. Please call me to set up a time to visit your ' site. Sincerely, 1 -ate Gt Jo Ann Olsen Senior Planner cc: Dave Hempel, Sr. Engineering Technician II Paul Krauss, Planning Director City Council Planning Commission I 4 CITYOF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900• FAX (612) 937-5739 3 July 23, 1990 Mr. Henry Griner Lakeview Hills Apartment Management 8800 Lake Riley Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Mr. Griner: Enclosed please find two recycling brochures which provide information on how to prepare recyclables and on the Chanhassen ' Program. This information should help with educating your residents on recycling. The City greatly appreciates Lakeview Hills Management providing recycling services to your residents. We have received calls from residents of Lakeview Hills Apartments wishing to recycle and I am sure they will be very pleased that they too can now recycle. Please keep me in touch with how the program is working and if the City can be of further help. ' Sincerely, C/We .7\ ' Jo Ann Olsen Senior Planner JO:v • ' cc: City Council Recycling Commission • 1 1 c.c.. Na - I CAMPBELL, KNUTSON, SCOTT & FUCHS, P.A. Attorneys at Law I Thomas J. Campbell Roger N. Knutson Thomas M. Scott (612)456-9539 Gary G. Fuchs July 17, 1990 Fax (612)456.9542 James R. Walston Elliott B. Knetsch Gregory D. Lewis I Dennis J. Unger Scott Harr Assistant Public Safety Director O .-,, ,,,, I City of Chanhassen 690 Coulter Drive P.O. Box 147 I Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: City of Chanhassen vs. Lowell Carlson IDear Scott: I appeared for a pre-trial on July 9, 1990 in this case. II Mr. Carison's attorney asked Judge Hopper for a continuance and his motion was granted. The case is now set for pre-trial on September 10, 1990 and jury trial on September 11, 1990. It will be necessary for you and JoAnn Olsen to attend and testify at the Itrial. Mr. Carlson's attorney convinced the judge that progress is 1 being made. Mr. Carlson had a list of fourteen vehicles which he claims have been sold and removed from the property. I did spend considerable time discussing with both Mr. Carlson and his II attorney the need to remove all items which were not on the property in 1985. Please arrange to inspect the property some time around I August 10, 1990, and let me know what you find. If substantial progress has not been made, I would like to meet with you and JoAnn to prepare for the trial. 1 Very truly yours, CAMPBELL, KNUTSON, SCOTT II & FUCHS, P.A. II BY: Elliott B. Knetsch IEBK:mlc cc: Don Ashworth V RECEIVED Paul Krauss IIJoAnn Olsen JUL 181990 CITY OF CHANHASSEN IYankee Square Office III • Suite 202 • 3460 Washington Drive • Eagan, MN 55122 r K Coll C C- /J e �; CARVER COUNTY COURTHOUSE ALLEN J. WALLIN ,, - `- ... J 600 EAST 4TH STREET - BOX 9 I Carver County Sheriff { / CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318-2190 ' "-:4 Q. (612) 448-3435 'NESO I COUNTY OF CAQVEQ IJuly 16, 1990 1 Dear City & Township Officials, . In accordance with the language of the police contract, we are I required each year to determine actual costs for service. Based on those calculations, any shortages must be billed back to the contracting community or surpluses be paid back to them. 1 The Sheriff's Department and Carver County Chief Accountant, Gino Businaro, have completed those calculations for the year 1989. -' Enclosed, please find your communities portion of the payback. At this time, I would like to take the opportunity to inform you that we had increased the cost for 1990, five and one-half percent I (5 1/2%) . Due to a contract settlement, we have under estimated the hourly rate. As a result, it appears that in 1991, when actual 1990 costs are calculated, there will be a shortage. I would I encourage you to escrow the amount received back this year for the shortage that may be billed back to you in 1991. I apologize for any inconvenience that this may cause your community. IIShould you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. IISincerely, tom= 4)4,12-4_, 1 Allen J. Wallin Sheriff IAJW:prr Enclosure RECEIVED Icc: Gino Businaro, Chief Accountant JUL 181990 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN I 1 Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer I I I • I I I I cgaNsassEN CH COULTER MINN.• O BOX 147 CHANHASSEN,MN 55317 RECEIPT' CITY OF PHONE.(612)937-1900 j` ' 31802 '' �r RECEIVED OF (J ' l f %/ DATE / - ��� /�J i DESCRIPTION PERM/LIC. AMOUNT FUND SOURCE OBJ PROG. 1 // / . ,-7 /..), J' / i i r / 7m.!,1- i !'� (" f 7 C, % 0 1 1 1 • TOTAL AMOUNT �()�� CHECK CASH ❑ DEPUTY TREASURER I I I I I I CITY Of cc CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 ' July 30 1990 ' Countryside Management, Inc. Attn: Mr. C. E. Van Eeckhout President 1935 West Wayzata Blvd. ' Suite 165 Long Lake , MN 55356 ' Re: Vineland Forest Addition File No. 89-27 (pvt) ' Dear Mr. Van Eeckhout: It is my understanding, from a recent discussion with Mr. Nelson Ott , that the storm sewer easement you reference in your July 19, ' 1990 correspondence has been acquired by you. Once the easement has been recorded with the County, the two-year maintenance period can commence for the utility portion of this project. ' I concur that it is "unfair" to hold your utility contractor hostage for your failure to previously obtain this easement. It is difficult for me to understand how on the one hand you can understand the developer's obligation to construct a storm sewer over the adjacent property without also feeling obligated and responsible for acquiring the right to use the land that it is ' constructed upon. Your lack of control over the adjacent property has nothing to do with your obligation to acquire this easement as a part of your subdivision improvements. As this ' office had communicated to you on several previous occasions,, if the easement were not able to be negotiated by you personally, the City would have entertained using its powers of eminent domain to acquire the easement. In either case, the acquisition ' of the easement would be at the developer's expense since this improvement is necessary and benefitting solely the Vineland Forest subdivision. This was communicated to you in the ' conditions of approval of the plans and specifications in December of 1989 and numerous times since. Mr. C. E. Van Eeckhout July 30 , 1990 ' Page 2 ' I thought it important to set the record straight as far as the City 's role in this matter. I believe City staff has cooperated with you extensively, not only with the preparation of the legal description but also in providing you with the easement document ' to assist you in expediting this matter. I am pleased that this matter has been resolved and I look forward to the recording of the easement document such that the maintenance period can ' commence on the utility portion of this project. We will then have no objection to releasing the final 10% retainage on the Machtemes contract. Sincerely, CITY OF CHANHASSEN I ,Gary Warren , P.E. City EiQgineer GGW:ktm ' c: Don Ashworth, City Manager Dave Hempel , Sr. Engineering Technician Chuck Machtemes , Machtemes Construction 1 I COUNTRYSIDE MANAGEMENT (\ Residential & Commercial Properties . ,4i,., .Q.1 _ e e N • /'l .s ""0.y )4Q 60/ July 19 , 1990 - - 4Pda.iQ1 441;// Ott '''' 1 ' Mr. David Hempel il City of Chanhassen P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 IRe: Vineland Forest • IDear Dave: As I have stated in the past, I do not accept any responsibility for obtaining "off-site" easements in the Fox I Chase subdivision. I believe this to rightly be a City problem. II think it is unfair to hold my utility contractor hostage because of a past failure on your part to obtain an easement in an adjacent subdivision. I do not now have, nor I have I ever had any control over the adjacent property, and at no time prior to my plat approval was this specific question addressed, discussed, or agreed to. II request you modify your position as to the start of the two-year maintenance period. ISincerel . COU Y . MANAGEMENT, INC. . . Van Eeckhout, . ' President CEV/sjc . _ _ • Icc: Gary Warren, City Engineer - 1 Chuck Machtemes, Machtemes -Construction St, e Johnston, Merila & Associates RECEIVED •I on Ashworth, City Manager JUL 23 1990 ICITY OF CHANHASSEN I1935 West Wayzata Blvd. • Long Lake,MN 55356 (612) 473-1578 • I - ,4 ^Ir- Cc " I -i� rEV PLANNING TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING URBAN DESIGN I BRW.INC. - THRESHER SQUARE • 700 THIRD STREET SOUTH • MINNEAPOLIS.MINNESOTA 55415 • PHONE- 6121370-0700 FAX. 612/370.1378 ec . tli , 1 1 w July 2, 1990 -- I Mr. Brad Mattson Shafer Contracting Oft o 21 ��.� r C�0. •`�;I IZ Shafer, MN 55074 . JUN O .- 1990 ' RE: North Side Parking Lot/City Hall Project CP 87-17 ENGINEERING DEPT. IIDear Brad, Shafer Contracting is hereby directed to remove and replace the entire step II assembly and approximately 80 square feet of exposed aggregate walk located at the main entrance to Chanhassen City Hall . I The step assembly and exposed aggregate are not acceptable work for the following reasons: Step Assembly I1. Overall surface finish of the step assembly is poor. Some areas are smooth, other areas are rough, edge lines are not clean or straight. . II2. The top riser of the step assembly varies in height in excess of one inch. 3. Riser noses on the step assembly are chipped in a minimum of 14 separate II locations. Numerous other areas of the riser noses appear to be ready to let go at any time. 1 4. There are several locations on the horizontal surfaces of the treads where concrete appears "patched" and is uneven with the surrounding surface area. I 5. Sleeves for the railings were not all set at the same location in treads or as dimensioned in the plans. Exposed Aggregate Walk 1 1. There is an approximate 20-square-foot area in front of the above-mentioned concrete step assembly that does not drain. The removal area will likely IIhave to be larger than the area that does not drain. AN AFFILIATE OF THE BENNETT.RINGROSE.WOLSFELD.JARVIS INC.GROUP I DAVID J BENNETT DO•+=_D J.'RINGROSE RICHARD P WOLSFELD PETER E JARVIS THOMAS f CARROLL CRAIG A AMUNDSEN DONALD E HUNT MARK G SWENSON JOHN 6 M:NAMARA RICHARD 0 PILGRIM DALE N BECKMANN DENNIS J SUTLIFF JEFFREY L BENSON RALPH C.BLUM DAVID L GRAHAM GARY J ERICKSON IIMINNEAPOLIS DENVER PHOENIX TUCSON ST.PETERSBURG SAN DIEGO • Mr. Brad Mattson • July 2, 1990 Page 2 The removal and replacement of the concrete step assembly and exposed aggregate walk shall be at the expense of Shafer Contracting. We ask that the step assembl y and as soon as possible to allow completion athe onofep k be removed and replaced project. ' Sincerely, ' BRW, .l 1 ' Gary A. i ret PE Project Manager ' GE/jkh cc: Gary Warren Greg Roy File: 7-8915 • 1 1 1 I I 1 I i 1764L.,■■ Engineers p� 6/13, 1 Planners CC "11.4 d l C� JHILL Economists maw Scientists ' July 17, 1990 GL030177.A0.01 1 Mr. Gary Warren 1 City Engineer City of Chanhassen 690 Coulter Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 ' Dear Mr. Warren: 1 Subject: MWCC Systemwide I/I Evaluation Public Meetings, Week of June 18, 1990 1 Several attendees at the subject public meetings expressed an interest in learning about the comments from meetings other than those that they attended. The attached summary of those comments is provided for your information. We look forward to further discussion of these issues either at the July 23, 1990, workshop or at future public meetings to be scheduled during the second phase of the ' project. In the meantime, feel free to call Wayne Rikala of the MWCC at 229-2127 or me with any questions you may have. Sincerely, 1 CH2M HILL 1 404 u Nancy U. Schultz Project Manager 1 • CITY OF CHANHASSE a 1 � rPi r mm/GLT993/007.51 �'�U1 LJ 1 Attachment JUL 1 91990 ENGINEERING DEPT. 1 1 CH2M HILL Milwaukee Office 310 West Wisconsin Avenue Suite 700 P.O 414.272.2426 Box 2090 Milwaukee,Wisconsin 53201 PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY Five public information meetings were held at various locations throughout the seven- county region to provide a relatively accessible opportunity for all interested communities. The locations and times are presented below. ' Date Time Location June 18 2:30-4:30 p.m. Dakota County Library—Wescott 1340 Wescott Road Eagan, Minnesota 55123 Public Meeting Room June 19 2:30-4:30 p.m. Hennepin Technical College—Eden • Prairie Campus 9200 Flying Cloud Drive ' Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Room H117 and H118 ' June 20 2:30-4:30 p.m. White Bear Lake Police Station 4700 Miller Avenue White Bear Lake, Minnesota 55110 Old City Council Chambers June 20 7:00-9:00 p.m. City of Falcon Heights ' 2077 West Larpenter Avenue Falcon Heights, Minnesota 55113 • City Council Chambers ' June 21 2:30-4:30 p.m. Brooklyn Center Civic Center Community Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway ' Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 Constitution Hall ' The following program was presented at each of the five public meetings. 1. Welcome: Ray Odde, MWCC ' Mr. Odde welcomed the public officials attending the meetings and briefly discussed the reasons why the MWCC is undertaking another I/I study. ' 2. Introduction: Mary Richardson, Richardson, Richter and Associates Ms. Richardson introduced the project team and the participants and presented ' the agenda for the meeting. The agenda for each meeting was as follows: • Opening Remarks ' • Meeting Format • Project Overview 1 1, • Open Discussion ' • I/I Quantification Issues • Incentive/Disincentive Issues • Further Involvement 3. Project Overview: Nancy Schultz, CH2M HILL Mrs. Schultz presented an overview of the current I/I Evaluation. Her presentation consisted of the following elements: • Explanation of Terminology pertinent to I/I • Sources of I/I • Why another I/I study? • Project Objectives ' • History of MWCC Area I/I Control • Project Status 4. I/I Quantification Issues: David Bennett, CH2M HILL ' Mr. Bennett first briefly described the objectives of I/I quantification methods. In evaluating I/I quantification methods, the team is looking for a method that will accomplish the following: • Estimate Volume and Peak Rate ' • Utilize Reliable Meter Data • Applicable to Unmetered Times and Areas—power outages • Uniform Basis for Comparison • Simulate Actual and Design Events • Easily Applied and Understood • Adaptable to Multiple Uses Mr. Bennett then led a discussion with the participants of their I/I impact concerns and of their thoughts on potential policy options for incentive and disincentive programs. 5. Further Involvement: Mary Richardson, Richardson, Richter and Associates ' Ms. Richardson closed the meetings with a description of the opportunities for further community input, including the Technical Workshop on July 23, 1990, and the proposed Phase II Community participation program. Summaries of the discussions from each of the public meetings are attached. ' GLT933/008.51 1 2 MWCC Systemwide I/I Evaluation ' Public Information Meeting ' Location: Falcon Heights, Minnesota Date: June 20, 1990 Is Infiltration and Inflow a problem in your community? Jack Frost, Metro Council: How will you handle combined sewer system areas undergoing separation. Dave Bennett: They will have to be treated differently than other communities. Wet weather flows could be viewed as a ' large inflow source. During dry weather, CSO areas could be analyzed for infiltration in the same manner as non-CSO areas. Fridley: I understand that the MWCC is installing new meters and that the present meters are not accurate or working ' correctly. Shouldn't you wait until you can get better readings on these new meters instead of relying on old inaccurate data. Ray Odde: We were not without good readings before; we are now updating and enlarging our capabilities to enable us to get even better readings. OSM: How detailed will the results be? Are we just evaluating the data that is available? Dave Bennett: We will be evaluating by treatment service area, not by the actual source. Fridley: We have a tight system now, however, most of our I/I comes in at the 14 miles of interceptors. This makes my community look bad. Will the MWCC interceptors be looked at separately? ' Jack Frost, Metro Council: Are you going to look at what it will cost a given community or are you going to look at it systemwide? If someone is over the standard, will the rest of the communities end up picking up the cost for that ' community? Will the cost of impacts to Metropolitan facilities be estimated? ' Dave Bennett: We will look at Metropolitan costs, systemwide. We will estimate facility cost impacts by making estimates of the reasonable amount of I!I that could be reduced Isystemwide. For instance, a particular wastewater 3 !' I, treatment plant might only need to be designed for ' 3.0 Mgd instead of 3.8 Mgd if I/I were reduced. Incentives and Disincentives for I/I Removal ' Fridley: Carrots are better than sticks, however, carrots come out of my pocket; therefore, I say penalize the community collection system that is not tight. If the MWCC subsidizes someone high in I/I, it is all coming out of my pocket. I think disincentives are the best approach. I ' also believe that the MWCC can be doing a better job. I don't see that MWCC has any incentive to improve, because the users pay either way. Make sure that the disincentives deter the MWCC. MWCC has improved some over the last 8 years, but still need to improve more. OSM: When you talk about inverted rates, what would this be based on? Would this be on a per capita basis. ' Falcon Heights: Will there be an adjustment for communities with large university populations? We experienced a 20 percent increase over the past year. Is our unit rate the same as everyone else? What is this based on? ' Ray Odde: Falcon Heights' cost went up due to the increased flow from the fairgrounds, plus an adjustment was necessary ' because of some underestimation of the university flow. The rate is the same as everyone else. Fridley: With all the talk about non-point source pollution, we area heading at treating all storm runoff anyway; wouldn't combined sewers be better? GLT933/008.51 1 I I 4 I. it MWCC Systemwide I/I Evaluation IPublic Information Meeting ILocation: White Bear Lake, Minnesota Date: June 20, 1990 Is Infiltration and Inflow a problem in your community? White Bear Lake: For the most we have a ve ry tight collection system in our community. We have a few small problem areas, I but we are adjusting manhole covers. We are aware of one particular area that is bad, but that is being worked on. Overall, our system is quite tight. IWoodbury: Work was done o n many areas that were identified in the early 1980s. Now we really aren't aware of any I others. Occasionally manholes are being popped off during construction. Would the cities really see a reduction in the amount in rates due to these changes. 1 Answer: Overall, you may not see a difference in your rates especially if you are already tight. You may, however, see the difference in the need to build larger treatment Ifacilities. North St. Paul: We have worked on our I/I the last 5 years. We have a Ilack of confidence in the metering system. Ray Odde: We must go through a 6-year cycle in order to get an I accurate reading that is representative of I/I. I/I control looked effective in the dry years; however, now it looks doubtful. IStil lwater: Downtown Stillwater has been identified as having a high I/I problem. The old buildings are hooked up to the sanitary sewer systems; we have no storm sewer. We are Iplanning on fixing this situation. However, this will be very disruptive to these old buildings. Next year they will be working to replumb these areas. This could have I a big social impact because it would be a burden on taxpayers. IDave Bennett: Do you have a regular inspection on problem areas? Stillwater: We are now inspecting manholes regularly and the leaky I ones are being replaced. On top of the hill, there are few problems. However, most are above groundwater. How are you going to get back down to the community 1 violators instead of looking at it systemwide? I 5 I I Answer: No one wants to dictate that a city reduce I/I for I example, by 20 percent. We are hoping that by providing incentives and disincentives, the community will be motivated to tighten their systems. ISEH: What will community involvement be in this first phase? Are you asking the communities to go out and do flow Imonitoring? Will there be a cost commitment needed? Answer: Right now, we are not asking communities to perform monitoring. We would like the communities to I participate in meetings and workshops of this type as the study progresses, and to complete and submit their annual MWCC Sewer Use Surveys if they have not Ialready done so. Incentives and Disincentives for I/I Removal IWhite Bear Lake: NSP is using incentive work, which is very effective. They use rebates and low interest loans. Money talks I and is motivating people. They have gained some control over the power usage. Perhaps this would also be useful with 111. I Roseville: Low interest loans would be helpful; it would benefit everyone because everyone would have to pay for the new facility. Maybe it could be funded by a pool of Imoney contributed on an escalating scale by users. , Birchwood: A small community would not have the money, time, or I facilities to even identify sources of I/I. Therefore, they may need some seed money just to identify the problems. INorth St. Paul: It is not fair to penalize the dry communities. Wet communities should put into a pool to pay to fix their I systems. The surcharge money could go for a loan program. Mary Richardson: How can you penalize people who live in a low geographical area? Woodbury: The same may be said for an older versus a new system. I Cost of the new systems were not paid by everyone, so why should we pay to redo the older leaky communities' systems? IComment: The existing rate structure offers enough incentive. You can estimate how much extra you are paying for I/I, and I how much it would cost to remove it, and look at it in terms of payback over time. 1 6 I Stillwater: You could get low interest loans if the work was done within 15 years. If the work was done in a timely manner, you would use the low interest rate. However, if the work was not done, then a higher rate would be ' used. Stillwater: The cost to the individual homeowner must be considered as well as the cost to the community. You must consider the unquantifiable social costs. We have identified some businesses which would cost $15,000 to $20,000 to replumb. It could put them out of business. ' How do you enforce this? The same would be said about individual homes. There are many hidden indirect costs. ' SEH: How combined sewer systems would be handled is another issue. Mary Richardson: It has been suggested that if regulations were imposed . state- or region-wide, it would be easier to impose on a community basis. Do you think that these regulations Iwould be easier to enforce on a systemwide basis? Stillwater: Yes, coming from a higher authority would make it easier to enforce. Stillwater: A reduction in the flow would be easier to sell to the public. Will you be doing additional metering in the second phase? ' Comment: Not really in favor of state or Metro enforcement. The issue would be able to justify itself without an outside "hammer." ' Comment: Our incentive would be for a Metro agency to provide local governments an estimate of what savings they might get for doing sewer rehabilitation work. Comment: What about Commission facilities? Dave Bennett: We are not planning to do monitoring on a community level, however, spot metering at interceptors may be done. The study will examine both the local system and ' Commission interceptors I/I and estimate how much is entering from each. Susan Kimberly: The MWCC must do what it takes to look at its own ' system and to make sure it meets the same standards as the communities. 7 I Woodbury: Will the metering on the MWCC system be studied? We have had some disagreements with MWCC on the location of meters in our area. ' Dave Bennett: We will discuss more about the MWCC metering system in our next workshop. GLT993/008.51 I 1 I 1 1 8 I I MWCC Systemwide I/I Evaluation IPublic Information Meeting ILocation: Brooklyn Center, Minnesota Date: June 21, 1990 IIs Infiltration and Inflow a problem in your community? Question: You showed that in 1986, 18 percent of the total flow in the system was I/I. What percent of infiltration and Iinflow is Minneapolis and St. Paul combined sewage? Ray Odde: I don't know the exact percent, however, Minneapolis I and St. Paul has a total flow of 45 percent of all the plants in the Metro System so a good percentage could be from the combined sewer systems in which I/I was Icaptured. Carver County: Are sump pumps a large part of the concern? Where Ishould they be discharged? Question: Why are we doing another I/I study? I Coon Rapids: Are we evaluating the cost-effectiveness of removing I/I? It seems to me that you have already made your decision that removal will take place rather than evaluate I whether it is cost-effective. You should be doing a cost- effective analysis. I Answer: The study will look at costs on a systemwide basis only. It will not get into source detection or into attempting to predict what rehabilitation work would be cost-effective Iwithin the local collection systems. Question: You say incentive; where do you have more success, in controlling inflow or infiltration? IAnswer: Controlling inflow is much more successful. I Crystal: Has the MWCC identified any particular areas where infiltration and inflow can be controlled, such as at interceptors?" ISt. Louis Park: Will you be redoing the combined sewer systems? Our combined sewers are huge; we have no intent of being I 100 percent tight, because it wouldn't be cost-effective. What will be required of the cities? 1 Minneapolis: We have tried to meter some of our large tunnels, but because of inflow problems, we can't find two spots 1 9 I I where meters will provide good data. We have some I large tunnels with only 3 inches of flow—they're underutilized. How will CSO be examined? Question: Are there problems now in the interceptors? I Ray Odde: - Some are now at 75 percent or greater of capacity. We need to buy some capacity by removing excess I/I. IQuestion: Do the MWCC sewers have excess storage capacity like the combined sewer systems? Answer: No, the suburban growth is taking it up. IIncentives and Disincentives for I/I Removal Brooklyn Center: We have a lot of old sewers that are not tight; what can • we do to reduce infiltration and inflow, and what would I be an incentive? How could you demonstrate that you have improved your system? If after all this, there is no .significant change, then what? IAnswer: By using historical data, you can compare it to new figures. On an individual community basis, you must Idetermine whether reduction in I/I is cost-effective. Comment: I believe that the real incentive would be the decrease in I the sewer bill, as with the current system. I would favor disincentives over incentives. Mounds View: Interceptors are the biggest violators in our community. 1 The MWCC pipe runs under two swamps. Mounds View is one of the wettest areas; what about these types of locations? IBlaine: I am opposed to grants for rehabilitation. I Maple Grove: I would be opposed to moratoriums systemwide or community specific. I Comment: I would be opposed to moratoriums unless there is a capacity problem. Mounds View: This is not the proper time to discuss incentives and I disincentives. You don't know what incentives and disincentives should be used or what will work until you know what type of problem you are dealing with. ICrystal: You will have to help the cities identify the sources of I/I. I favor technical assistance as an incentive because 1 1 10 I 1 of the nature of my community: it is small in area and dense in population. Comment: Moratoriums influence both areas while the problems usually are in old areas. Comment: I support grants as an incentive. Comment: I favor disincentives because then the City can make a decision whether to rehabilitate or pay the freight. GLT993/008.51 1 I 1 1 1 ' 11 I MWCC Systemwide I/I Evaluation IPublic Information Meeting ILocation: Eagan, Minnesota Date: June 18, 1990 IIs Infiltration and Inflow a problem in your community? Lakeville: We have done an Infiltration and Inflow study, but we I can't measure effectiveness, particularly when there is a limited impact. How will this study be different from the last study? We see a problem with a joint being fixed in one place and another problem showing up somewhere I else. Will you look at the physical practicality of removal? I Nancy Schultz: Our job will be more the cost of fixing the system rather than the actual identification of the site. We will stress the system cost, but we will also look at the practical Irehab potential. Farmington: When the past studies were done, groundwater was at an iall time high. What data do you plan to use? Answer: The most current data, from 1986 to 1990, most likely. I Lakeville: Lakeville is concerned with Empire WWTP. We don't want a restriction of plant capacity. It is a problem. I Lakeville: What about the MWCC Interceptors? A big problem is that you can spend a lot of money and still not prove that you did any good. You can't separate what's in the Iinterceptor versus what's in the collector system. Bloomington: You would have significant citizen impact when you tell I them to disconnect private lines. Therefore, it is a lot more than the dollars involved in fixing Infiltration and Inflow problems. IQuestion: What about private property? Private lines are largely unmetered. How can we get to these problems? I Ray Odde: Foundation drains are the least controllable source because of identification; this leads to social and political problems. What is cost-effective? IQuestion: What hydrological conditions cause I/I? I 12 I I Ray Odde: It isn't the amount of rain fall at a given time, but the I condition of the groundwater at the time. The worst time is when the ground is frozen and it rains. ' Bloomington: Are you metering or using past data? Answer: We are using long-term MWCC data over the past I10 years. Question: How will incentives and disincentives be monitored? I Answer: This is a tough question; we are looking at various options of monitoring. We are looking to you for ideas and answers. 1 Incentives for Reducing Infiltration and Inflow I Bloomington: Tight communities would object to a direct grant program that they must pay for. Maybe a nondirect fee for fund source or low interest loans targeted to citizens I may work. Any others tie to the incremental cost of system operations. We must make sure that it is fair and well funded. I South St. Paul: South St. Paul is in the middle of a 10-year separation program. The system changes dramatically from year to year. We took steps from the previous study; we spent I over $1,000,000 and for the most part Infiltration and Inflow has been taken care of. What will be the benefit of studying I/I again for them. ILakeville:- I/I reduction is not directly related to cost reduction. It is very difficult to prove effectiveness. IFarmington: What is a base condition for peak reduction? How do you compare wet and dry communities? I Ray Odde: Reduction of peak flows will save on the cost of expansion on the plant, the expense to manage and prevent overloading, which in turn reduces risk of Ibreakdown. Farmington: The MWCC has no incentive to fix an inflow source. I For example: A farmer may pop a manhole top in order to drain his fields. Ray Odde: In these instances, if the MWCC is notified, your bill may be adjusted. I 1 13 I Disincentives for Reducing Infiltration and Inflow ' Comment: A moratorium is pretty strong medicine. This involves the private citizens and industry. ' Comment: If a surcharge is used, would have to separate out MWCC I/I. The physical capacity limit is out; the MWCC is there to serve. If the MWCC had a team that 1 would come down and assist the communities, it would be helpful to those who don't feel they have the technical expertise. The communities are lacking ' technological assistance. Ray Odde: This idea of a team has been discussed before, however, we do not have the funding. MWCC still has agreements with about 18 communities to maintain our system for us. ' Comment: You really can't evaluate an option until you know how it will be quantified. Will it be equitable? Are we striving for a total system solution? ' Question: Is the study a response to a problem? ' Answer: No, it is to avoid problems in the future in the system; this is a long-term management system. Farmington: A rate structure would be most effective. How do we identify peak flow? We spend a lot of money on I/I • control, but still have a problem. ' Bloomington: The MWCC in the past years has had the policy that everyone pays the same fee, regardless if you have a new efficient system or an old leaky one. This establishes that we have a total system. If we go to an incentive/ disincentive program, it will break the communities down and divide it as our problem and their problem. This moves in an opposite direction of MWCC's most recent Policy. GLT993/008.51 14 I MWCC Systemwide I/I Evaluation iPublic Information Meeting Location: Eden Prairie, Minnesota Date: June 19, 1990 Is Infiltration and Inflow a problem in your community? IEden Prairie: We experienced extensive problems in the 1986 super storm. There was a lot of basement backup. We now • have a new system that is almost entirely made up of plastic pipe. Now about all the problems we have are from sump pump inflow. How do you address the I question of constitutional rights, when you want to inspect basements for sump pump violations? This sort of thing will be easier to enforce systemwide rather than an individual community basis. Ion Victoria: What time commitments are you looking for from the cities? Is everything you used on the MWCC Sewer 1 User Inventory? Chanhassen: The Commission probably has more surcharge and I/I I concerns. Private systems are a major concern. Don't overlook project control. The hardest part will be to get after the individual homeowner. Will the city be left to I carry the bag to enforce it? What time commitment do you expect from the cities? IMinnetonka: We don't really have an I/I problem. Prior Lake: - Our I/I level goes up with the lake level. We have been identified as not having a significant I/I problem. Is I there really a cost benefit to I/I removal? The results of the study depend on the Lake level. I Eden Prairie: I assume "how much I/1 can come out, and how much can be saved," are the net outcomes you are looking for. How can you quantify but not identify the source? Just I taking gross data and drawing conclusions is scary. Do you intend to do source detection? If you don't know the source, how do you distinguish it from the MWCC I flow. Nancy Schultz: We are trying to give the community some sort of incentive to look at I/I. Is it worthwhile for you? Probably not in a dry year. Is there a better way to look at the issue rather than cost-effectiveness? 1 1 15 I I Question: How much of this is on the community system and how I much of this is on the MWCC system. How will this be determined. Answer: This must be addressed because the interceptors don't I differentiate. Separate monitoring may be necessary. This is all part of the study. I Eden Prairie: You may pick a few communities and do intense studies using them as pilot studies. I Minnetonka: That may well work, however, we don't want to be told to do something that doesn't work for us. In our community, the MWCC interceptors are under water. IThey are the main contributors in our community. Question: How can it be cost-effective to go back and seal cracks in pipes in manholes? Will this be taken into account? IDave Bennett: You are right; you can't expect do spot repairs and expect it to be significantly reduced. 1 Comment: We believe that if you are going to enforce incentive and disincentive options, then you will have to make sure I that the pilot cities are reflective of each of the communities' needs. You have to have better statistics than what is available now. IComment: We need a system solution, not a community focus. We need an overall program where all cities pay equally. For instance: an I/I strike force. IQuestion: We fear wet communities will get orders to reduce their I/I. We are in a river bed so I/I is high when homes are I flooded. We can't reduce this, however, it can skew the whole result. I Dave Bennett: That is why long-term data will give a better outlook as the cycles of wetness and, therefore, more I/I. I Chanhassen: Whether it's the Commission or local pipe can always be argued. Part of the difficulty is the assumptions that are used to quantify the data. These may invalidate the I study. For instance, the Met. Council does not know that there are 12,000 people living in Chanhassen; they believe we still only have 9,000. Therefore, they think we have more 1/I than we actually do. We are very leery Iof flow monitoring. I/I strike force is a better idea. Question: Was the study mandated by the Met. Council? I 1 16 I I . Dave Bennett: Yes, there is I/I in the system and they want to know how much it is costing us. IQuestion: Will they mandate that the individual cities take care of this? This scares us. IShakopee: For these cities in a river basin, and the river is up, the study would "hang them out to dry." INancy Schultz: This is what the meetings are all about. We want to identify if I/I is a problem and if it is a problem, how will it be taken care of. ' Incentives for Reducing Infiltration and Inflow I Minnetonka: How would you build equity into this system for those communities that are tight (no problem with I/I)? This could actually have a negative effect. This study focuses on communities that are wet; would the tight communities be subsidizing the wet communities? I Answer: Equity may be built in on a demand schedule; for example, if you have more water to be treated after a rainstorm, that would mean more I/I is getting into the system. I Question: What is equity? Is it a flat rate for I/I or varied per groundwater elevation? IComment: Maybe a demand charge for peaks. IComment: Equity depends on where you are looking from. Comment: Grant loans and credits systems, etc., may just add too I much administrative overhead; this is a cost to be considered. I Comment: There might be a metrowide policy requiring property inspection. Make it statewide or metrowide so cities would have someone to share the blame with. I Chaska: Geography has a lot to do with it; how you justify this for communities in low lying areas. IDisincentives for Reducing Infiltration and Inflow Eden Prairie: Disincentive options are more equitable to those Icommunities who are tight. Dave Bennett: What reaction would you get from an individual Ideveloper? 1 17 I I1 Minnetonka: We are not a hot bed for development, so it would not I be a major impact. You could determine how much infiltration and inflow should be there based on the proposed population. You may have to put the burden I back on the communities. Is it palatable for you to pay this amount, or do you want to take the dollars and fix your system. • I Comment: There is an incentive/disincentive program out there: $1.00 per 1,000 gallons or whatever. Maybe this rate should be raised uniformly. IEden Prairie: Developers could pay an impact fee. I am on a committee for development with the Met. Council. Money is a better way than moratoriums. IQuestion: Disincentives look better from a dry community. I GLT993/008.51 I I I I I • I I I . I 18 FA SPRINGSTED c c 1 L} ' , PUBLIC FINANCE ADVISORS 85 East Seventh Place. Suite 100 I Saint Paul, MN 55101-2143 y,—:.) (612)223-3000 Fax: 612-223-3002 JUL 3, 1993 IJuly 12, 1990 era OF CHANHASSEN Ac..... ... ete...:.... er. ,,,A,... Mr. Donald Ashworth, City Manager ,,,y,,,...,__ _ #4,... . Trr.s 4- City of Chanhassen I City Hall o K 690 Coulter Drive Pfry Chanhassen, MN 55317 I /&3 ( ; Re: Invoice for Community Center Study 7 Dear Don: Consistent with our discussion you will find-the enclosed invoice for $3,000 for advisory service plus expenses for our work on this study. The entire cost for advisory service for this I study was $14,780.95. From this amount we subtracted the balance of the 50 hours provided at no charge for the first service year. This hour balance was 17 hours, which at $125 per hour amounts to a $2,125.00 deduction from this expense amount. Deducting that I allowance and the amount invoiced leaves a balance to be absorbed by Springsted of approximately $9,240. We have discussed a number of ways of providing consideration for our time, given the I budget constraints of the City for this particular project. I propose that rather than any sort of non-related cash transaction that the annual 50 free hours for our services for the second service year be covered by our costs for this project. With this agreement Springsted would I still be absorbing approximately $4,200 in non-compensated costs for this project. Unless I hear from you otherwise, I will assume this is an acceptable arrangement for the City. Please feel free to contact us if we can be of any further assistance. IRespectfully, I C 3 )vu David N. MacGillivray IVice President rls IEnclosures I Indiana Office: Kansas Office: Wisconsin Office: 135 North Pennsylvania Street 6800 College Boulevard 500 Elm Grove Road • Suite 2015 Suite 600 Suite 101 Indianapolis. IN 46204-2498 Overland Park, KS 66211-1533 Elm Grove,WI 53122-0037 ' (317)684-6000 (913)345-8062 (414)782-8222 Fax. 317-684-6004 Fax: (913)345-1770 Fax: 414.782-2904 - SPRINGSTED IPUBLIC FINANCE ADVISORS 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100 Saint Paul, MN 55101-2143 I (612)223-3000 Fax: 612-223-3002 1 DATE: July 11, 1990 TO: Mr. Donald Ashworth, City Manager I City of Chanhassen City Hall 690 Coulter Drive IChanhassen, MN 55317 IFor Financial Advisory Services Performed from January 16, 1990 through April 30, 1990 RE: Community Center Study ISenior Officer (10.00 hrs. @ $150/hr.) $1,500.00 Project Manager (52.50 hrs. @$125/hr.) 6,562.50 I Officer (51.00 hrs. @ $115/hr.) 5,865.00 Support Staff (12.50 hrs. @ $35/hr.) 437.50 Less: Balance of 50 Free Hours Per Contract (17 hrs. @ $125/hr.) (2,125.00) ILess: Services Provided at No Charge (9,240.00) Subtotal $3,000.00 IOut-of-Pocket Expenses: Travel $ 135.79 Copies, Special Delivery and Telecopy 280.16 ITOTAL DUE $3,415.95 I I declare under penalty of law that this account is just and correct and that no part of it has Ibeen paid. -RINGSTED Incorporated I - BY: A t / s11a• ._ ' BONNIE C. MA SO y I Payment is due on receipt of this billing. After 30 days interest will be charged on any balance at the rate of 1%per month. Indiana Office: Kansas Office: Wisconsin Office: 135 North Pennsylvania Street 6800 College Boulevard 500 Elm Grove Road Suite 2015 Suite 600 Suite 101 Indianapolis, IN 46204-2498 Overland Park, KS 66211-1533 Elm Grove,WI 53122-0037 (317)684-6000 (913)345-8062 (414)782-8222 Fax: 317-684-6004 Fax: (913)345-1770 Fax:414-782-2904 - A/ • ee CAMPBELL, KNUTSON, SCOTT & FUCHS, P.A. � Attorneys at Law fv 'f:e s -i y Thomas J. Campbell ' Roger N. Knutson (612)456-9539 Thomas M. Scott Fax (612)456-9542 Gary G. Fuchs James R. Walston ' Elliott B. Knctsch Gregory D. Lewis July 19, 1990 Dennis J. Unger Mr. Harvey Swenson ' 6100 Green Valley Drive Minneapolis, Minnesota 55438 RE: Herman Field Park Dear Mr. Swenson: ' Enclosed please find ownership and encumbrance reports for property adjacent to Herman Field Park. Please note that the City of Chanhassen is trying to develop Herman Field Park. Prior to ' constructing park improvements, the City needs to acquire a 50 foot easement from property owners Lang and Will. On behalf of the City of Chanhassen, I request that you prepare appraisals ' outlining the valuation of the permanent easements to be granted by the Langs and Mrs. Will. Also enclosed to assist you in your completion of the ' appraisals is a plan for the Herman Field Park area. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do ' not hesitate to call me. Very truly yours, ' CAMPBELL, KNUTSON, SCOTT & FUCHS, P.A. ' BY: James R. Walston ' JRW:srn Enclosures ' cc: Don Ashworth R. Mark Koegler RECEIVED JUL 2 0 1990 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Yankee Square Office III • Suite 202 • 3460 Washington Drive • Eagan, MN 55122 1 I OWNERSHIP AND ENCUMBRANCE REPORT ' Kohlrusch Scott/Carver Abstract Company, Inc. hereby states that it has searched the records in Carver County, described or incorporating by reference the real property described below from October 12, 1978 at 8 a.m. to this 25th day of June, 1990 at 8 a.m. LEGAL DESCRIPTION ' The West 25.00 feet of the following described land: ' Those parts of Lots 31 and 32, Minnewashta Park, lying west of a line parallel with and distant 265 feet west of the east line of said Minnewashta Park, (which line is hereinafter reeferred to as Line A) , and lying east of a line described as follows : Commencing on the south line of said Lot 31 at a point 565 feet West of the east line of said Minnewashta Park; thence northerly to a point on the north line of said Lot 31 distant 331.73 feet West along the northerly line of said Lots 31 and 32, from said Line A, and there terminating . (Abstract Property) AT THE DATE OF THIS REPORT, DURING THE PERIOD SEARCHED, WE FIND THE ' FOLLOWING: ' 1. Last Grantee of Record: Marcia L. Will 2. Mortgages of Record for which no Satisfactions or releases have been filed: ' None 3 . Contracts for Deed or Leases which are open: ' None 4 . Mechanics Liens or Notices of Lis Pendens for which no Satisfactions, ' Releases or Discharges have been filed: None 5. Dissolution or Divorce Decrees reciting the above legal description: ' None • 11 6. According to the records for the past ten years in the Office of the County Recorder, Carver County, Minnesota, there are no Federal Tax Liens or State Tax Liens docketed therein remaining unreleased, nor are there any Notice of Bankruptcy proceedings in said County against the following : Marcia L. Will; ' PAGE 2 OF 2 7. According to the Judgment Dockets for the past ten years in the Office of the Clerk of District Court and in the Office of the Clerk of County Court, Carver County, Minnesota, there are no Judgments ' unsatisfied against the following: Marcia L. Will; 1 Dated this 25th day of June, 1990 at 8 a.m. NOTE: THIS REPORT IS NOT AN OPINION OF TITLE OR AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE, AND ' DOES NOT INSURE THE CONDITION OF THE TITLE. IT IS OF A LIMITED NATURE COVERING ONLY THE TIME AND TYPES OF DOCUMENTS SPECIFIED. NO ASSURANCE IS GIVEN THAT THIS REPORT REVEALS ALL MATTERS AFFECTING ' TITLE WHICH WOULD BE REVEALED BY AN ATTORNEY'S EXAMINATION OF A COMPLETE ABSTRACT OF TITLE. KOHLRUSCH SCOTT/CARVER ABSTRACT CO. , INC. BY Affe cy j tWade Kohlch Licensed Abstractor 1 4K.1G ni 4(n-o-ntt i. V. �•L,A AL.ia..::1....1..r.onl..m.,%on..•.n....: w...t..:1Is..) It7.,0 ifijbe 1tttre, elfode shit.........a4............ ..diy of April ja ..74, L.,;,.,;eri ,s.eharl: V. Lore:.in d Associates, n,co,-nar.tnntAip .tonea:tinr,„pf Riehard. „. .. V. Lopclin cz1 Marie Cathcricc Logclin C. tiles County of._.......11eeccpio................. . ....and:etate of..._..liinnesot , port ies v/t h.first part, and rma tit d. Lang and.. . ty„.�,ou„..Lang,. b.11ianil..pn.d wire ........ . I .. Aaslscy ._....._..__.._.«.... .... . ..._ _ . .,of the Countyof ■ _._......_._....___..and State ef... Minnesota.. - _.,��xi.tir�r of the•nand Pet Pt Eaitllts4ttb, Th a the said part ies: of 114 Aril port, in eonrier:rattan of the sum.of .. .. uac Dollar_and.other. good .and valuable.toa:iderati.on :61•l::i:rt•Fc I t,, .tae: •, it hand pcid Ly the said par ties of the second port,the receipt tthcreef is he,chy ud.•nowl. edged,do hereby Grant,Bargain,Sell,and Convey unto the said parties of the second pert as joint trna.r):s end not as tenant, En common, their assigns, the survivor of wad parties, old the hairs and aesig+u of the survivor,Forever,all the tract... or parcel.... of land lying and being in the County of I .-.- Carycr........... and:Leo of.tfinntsoto,auc+lbsrl as/oilorre,torustt• All of Lot 30 and that part t 31, Minnewaahta Park lying Westerly of a line described as follows: Co-lraencing on the South line of said Lot 31 at a point 565 I fact west of the East line of said Minnerashta Park; thence Northerly to a point `' on the North line of said Lot 31 distant 331.73 feet West, along the Northerly line of said Lots 31 and 32, from a line drawn parallel with and distant 263 feet West 1 of the East Line of said Niane:+ashta Park, Iii .1 deed is given in fulfillment of a certain contract for deed between the parties • • hereto, dated February 15, 1974, and is made subject to encumbrances, if any, by, 1 through or under any act or acts of said second parties. I • i I ‘. lit :•..T.an'• lug t:.2 ,.:-' • .... w t't.ti.,d 1i,t',IY unLtJn let s!>JUItl oe 'time treed Tax Lase Hereet,:,.� I 5; 1:�n e t f�� 41,*t:t:;.;:ri.•..E,r►s-•.-':44....f..•r,.•y.1.E1...:...,,p . .. i,t /)tyro!' '(' .....:0 ei i,CT.: or !:t.'i,}:K4 £'L'7. 0. - ..• • L n+rra.S•4�”y Ow., t' ,,,.,,,,t. ./. ;t :•TA I.�tC?, .t+.,vu T: =s=: ?e, %.r' 14-..J' ,:;).!.,:;,e. ,. r[ r •v It ,, - A'.`i.� �• TAI:• '`=' n itsat ._ ' ' :+ .. F. - 1 i N� Rp two�Jabe•ant+le r7elb tDr*amt, Together with art the hersditamerts and appurtenances there- DOREN Z • unto belonging or in anywise appertaining, to the said parties of the second part,their assigns,the trig iNGS vivor of said parties,and the heirs and assigns of the survivrr,Forever,the said parties of the sewed part LL taking as join( tenants and not as tenants in common. dnd the said. Logelin..4•.Associates,-•A••Amlattxterahip.,.eonsls.ting o.f..._...__ i Pi.4hp=.1!, ,..�o:e1�a....and..1111rt.ewC.a,txt.RZ.ice.So4elin....__......_.._........... ._._--_..r..........._... ..._.__ ' port tea of the first part,for--'teeselves-s-•their-•••••---emirs,executors and administrators do........ eo.erart with the said parties of the ss:ont part,their assigns,the survivor of said parties,and the heirs and a.eigus of the survivor,that....tbey_.are_sasU1 sdand in foe of the lands and premises aforesaid and have good right to earl and elonvey the same in snanatsr end form aforesaid, and that the taus are Ifree front all insuntbraners, i I I 1 Amid the above bargained and granted lands and premises, to the quiet and peaer+rrble possession of the • I said parties of the s send part,their assigns,the survivor of said partial,end the heirs and nutgus of the I •} 'survivor, against all persona lawfully alatrning or to claim the whole or any port thereof,subject to ineu.mtranaes, if any, hercinkfors mentioned, the said parties. of the first part will Warrant and Defend. 3rn Ct%tlmonp Eli`jeteet. The sold part_ill of the pet part hus ve._. hereunto set their.. I , heruis the Joy and year first above written. -RICHARD.V...LOE:tLlx.4.1550CLtZtS........ ..._._..y I24 3 ' / ” " • Kazle Co.tcrine Lo ells; „`� / ....e...s. mt,' ..16.b[ .,»...... • r..... •1,.. . .. .1.,.R.......... •--.--«-.-- ....... OWNERSHIP AND ENCUMBRANCE REPORT ' Kohlrusch Scott/Carver Abstract Company, Inc. hereby states that it has searched the records in Carver County, described or incorporating by reference the real property described below from May 2, 1974 at 8 a.m. to this 25th day of June at 8 a.m. LEGAL DESCRIPTION The East 25.00 feet of the following described land: ' All of Lot 30 and that part of Lot 31, Minnewashta Park lying westerly of a line described as follows: Commencing on the south line of said Lot 31 at a point 565 feet west of the east line of said Minnewashta Park; thence , ' northerly to a point on the north line of said Lot 31 distance 331.73 feet West, along the northerly line of said Lots 31 and 32, from a line drawn parallel with and distance 265 feet West of the East line of said ' Minnewashta Park. (Abstract Property) AT THE DATE OF THIS REPORT, DURING THE PERIOD SEARCHED, WE FIND THE ' FOLLOWING: 1. Last Grantee of Record: Kenneth J. Lang and Betty Lou Lang, husband and wife as joint tenants ' 2. Mortgages of Record for which no Satisfactions or releases have been filed: Mortgage dated August 10, 1976, filed August 17, 1976, as Doc. No. ' 29974, made by Kenneth J. Lang and Betty Lou Lang, husband and wife, to Minnetonka State Bank, a Minnesota corporation, to secure $35,000.00. For terms and conditions see record. ' Mortgage dated May 19, 1987, filed May 21, 1987 as Doc. No. 87186, made by Kenneth J. Lang and Betty Lou Lang, husband and wife, to Minneapolis Trades Credit Union, a Minnesota corporation, to secure $30,000.00. For terms and conditions see record. 3. Contracts for Deed or Leases which are open: None 4. Mechanics Liens or Notices of Lis Pendens for which no Satisfactions, Releases or Discharges have been filed: None 5. Dissolution or Divorce Decrees reciting the above legal description: ' None 6. According to the records for the past ten years in the Office of the ' County Recorder, Carver County, Minnesota, there are no Federal Tax Liens or State Tax Liens docketed therein remaining unreleased, nor are there any Notice of Bankruptcy proceedings in said County against the following: ' Kenneth J. Lang; Betty Lou Lang; Mrs. Kenneth J. Lang;- - - - IIPage 1 of 2 1 I Page 2 of 2 I ' 7. According to the Judgment Dockets for the past ten years in the Office of the Clerk of District Court and in the Office of the Clerk of County Court, Carver County, Minnesota, there are no Judgments unsatisfied against the following: Kenneth J. Lang ; Betty Lou Lang; Mrs. Kenneth J. Lang ;- - - - II Dated this 25th day of June, 1990 at 8 a.m. NOTE: THIS REPORT IS NOT AN OPINION OF TITLE OR AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE, AND DOES NOT INSURE THE CONDITION OF THE TITLE. IT IS OF A LIMITED NATURE COVERING ONLY THE TIME AND TYPES OF DOCUMENTS SPECIFIED. NO ASSURANCE IS GIVEN THAT THIS REPORT REVEALS ALL MATTERS. AFFECTING TITLE WHICH WOULD BE REVEALED BY AN ATTORNEY'S EXAMINATION OF A ' COMPLETE ABSTRACT OF TITLE. KOHLRUSCH SCOTT/CARVER ABSTRACT CO. , INC. BY 1L,4 ��L �v� Wade Kohlru ch ' Licensed Abstractor i 1 I I 1 , .: . . . s 1 •t: ----4- A. •;:,.;,a,:r- I _ : � " - , !•_ ,, , 3naatttCt err a sa e' : +. _#1.0ii,. _ttshar d ♦. to,11,111 r c! 07piiu•_� jw ..-- e r- •101 . ':S � ltiM eat r' ' '-r1;i: ,. -� -:'-•L er { t%r II .�. ,-' :A ••.t lets a Y. !►ill JI1l1.J�ri ia%.yil�=_• f, . -. -t- ,pala►y5LennNN� •_ 'e ,�.'_. • not w mid pert-Lei re I 1,e- �►+�parf,a•laYenai�tett•f 4.811"•f — - . rs ;.`itt:-'0-.4- , saber ral►+ila.,M�l as...a,,.a--.. -.. - Asst PEW it w self �• -�.-r.......-. 1, F r s�.,,,ti •o • 0-, direi° as m Mai.Awt . � Mr wwGw uM1 l Mt M� rl j. -`` «: ";1- a.- .. •. pn'Ni— y bat sett Mi/is Ar '. I - ;,: __ .-._sat bob W 0 Aeawde,free tint«O*"wM11 � y s. • ` 4 i ` ltifrOal 2•1 ' - Mesa pasts of iota 34 and 13, lets tevashta task, li►tep Vest of a lies parailal I with sad diatas: 263 fast West of 3s tact line of said lianseashta Tait, (*Leh line La hereintftor referred to as Lisa A) and South of a lies daserlbsd as halms: Come 'dr.: at a point es said Liss A, distant 164 feat birth, aloes s:il Lisa A, from tha South Lisa s' said Let 34i theses Vesterly a diatom* of I 1,35.25 hat to • paint 322.71 test Sosthaasterly fret the Xertherly lies of Lot ,,:; 5J, sail addition, in a seraieht 1-.as, free a pose: is the east•r U.S of S plaaa�t 11»., e:i! *la:, which pe.et is distant 317 tact Yoattrl,, sleet sell RECEIVED 4'' eaatar lies, fro:: said Llr.3 At t e:es Westerly fro= said potet, a distaste* of 203.12 feat, to a point ea tie Woo .arty line of said Lot 34 (whieh to the iastarly I ulna of Tersst Ave., tai' plat) distant 351.1$ foot Westerly ad Northerly alert v CA .� 1eutharly and tsstc::y lino of said Let $6, free Lisa A, and than tstsiasties. tVAN DOREN HAZARD 1 STALLINGS - Ta:eal 3-2 :..osa ,r.::s of Lots 31 and 32. Ma:weshta Tart..,lyi:.$ West of a line parallel ahilh lima . '�,a_:2 lists:: 263 :.l.' t•:yt of Cu, t:at line of said :tittno�aahta Path, 11 % u t.et,sisutf:ar rcfc rte to u Litre A), and bins Last of a line desetibad as tel• , ; , l jloovat Co�-aneinr. o.! C.: Soi.::t lino of s�lr Lot 31 at a point Si3 test Vast of �.i the test :::.e .! srld r.ic-ati:ael.ta Man's: these. Northerly to • poise se the 5eleth :ins of s_id i.•t J. e f.:.:r.: 331.73 fest Vast, gloat the Sertherly lino of said I .. :ate 31 std 32, fie-' ••.:t L:r.o A, a a the:. tereinatt* . • _ 4 tad ao said b et,■a I a •ie t,•1!a attd if kilt,rh M...14M.>k..Awl.e/Jed lJlt__. i I pM kaa/A*Jt►r pi pi,/s,.teaselv1e, e!N t lsfre,saeewlsnr sad sdhwd.(aM+4ry des awned WM M,wad peril.,of Of *tow,part Mss r sadly.Ms w►reieer W at�1d psrN44,oaf 5ti Aetn sates�,./she sM>!(n►, ,,.ee _ tho7 are-aew'i whip is}ie+y lAe ttt�i oaf prr.ttaes afMeriei;s� lied.{ ae oil.w,«,.,�tAs mass b swoon •.d foam ap►arl1,soh MM As•sew are d II free/..ws au lasootirrws►., c I } • Jai ilk sissy isr/Ward Let/►a+tfet fuser Nei;*ImQM M Ar ZuMt �_____ !M lair prifar y w great sAefr•aet(IeR A►�+fir•11410011104* As�tt+r ist•ate Mw t ewaesp If oar, st,t/ors wa►li NW I�s1140 4 NW PO attliLrigerroat OW • !a tLeett+..:..r :tl�.rest TA,se ■pis* tole as:pea. —" to emit at Bair...._._ N r � j e. ....a.u....,5 ►:i .w•. Y,• •• I /(4.-CAM P ELL KNUTSON, SCOTT & FUCHS, PA. Attorneys at Law - e. Thomas J. Campbell c.G —F",.�.,„c c ' Roger N. Knutson (612)456-9539 Thomas M. Scott Facsimile (612)456-9542 Gary G. Fuchs James R. Walston Elliott B. Un Den Dennis J. Unger July 3, 1990 Mr. Roger A. Pauly JUL 0 1144 Attorney at Law CITY OF CHANHfssEN Lang, Pauly & Gregerson, Ltd. 370 Suburban Place t250 Prairie Center Drive [ J Eden Prairie, MN 55344 ' Ms. Linda M. Pauly Rueben Mr. Ben Rueben 5333 Third Avenue South ' Minneapolis, MN 55419 Mr. Noel E. Pauly ' Mr. John Arhelger 3213 Colorado Avenue South St. Louis Park, MN 55416 ' Mr. Donald G. Pauly, Jr. 405 Heathrow Court Burr Ridge, IL 60521 ' Mr. Earl Pauly c/o Ms. Linda M. Pauly Rueben 5333 Third Avenue South ' Minneapolis, MN 55419 Re: City of Chanhassen vs. ' Roger A. Pauly, et al. Court File No. 89-24805 ' Gentlemen and Ms. Rueben: In the above entitled eminent domain proceeding, the Commis- sioners appointed by the Carver County District Court filed their ' Report dated June 25, 1990 with the Clerk of Court on June 25, 1990, wherein they made a monetary award as full payment for the acquisition of the property located at 460 West 78th Street in ' Chanhassen, Minnesota for municipal purposes, a copy of which Report is enclosed herewith. 1 Yankee Square Office III • Suite 202 • 3460 Washington Drive • Eagan, MN 55122 it ' July 3, 1990 Page 2 This is an award of the Court appointed Commissioners from ' which the City or any party having an interest in the land may appeal to the Court if the award is not satisfactory. If such an appeal is taken, it must be filed with the Clerk of the Carver County District Court within forty (40) days from June 25, 1990, with a copy thereof to all parties of record having an interest in the property and to Campbell, Knutson, Scott & Fuchs, P.A. , Suite 202, 3460 Washington Drive, Eagan, Minnesota 55122, as attorneys ' for the City. The Notice of Appeal must conform with all the requirements as set forth in Minn. Stat. § 117.145. The appeal period expires as of August 4, 1990. THIS IS MERELY A NOTICE OF AWARD MADE BY THE COMMISSIONERS AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSTRUED AS AN OFFER BY THE CITY NOR AN ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY OF THE AWARD. If no appeal is taken by either the City or any party, the ' City will deposit the amount of the award with the Clerk of District Court of Carver County. Thereafter, application may be made to the Court for distribution of the money by any claimant thereof. The Clerk of District Court does not have the power to make distribution of the award without an Order from the District Court. ' Very truly yours, CAMPBELL, KNUTSON, SCOTT & ' FUCHS, P.A. BY: Gary G. Fuchs ' GGF:rwg Enclosure cc: City of Chanhassen 1 i #44-____.-sfr Axfrir R . • '''rar ..• CARVER COUNTY COURTHOUSE /tx I Office of '' :7 600 EAST 4TH STREET `�� CHASKA,MINNESOTA 55318 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 4 1';�- *- Phone 448-3435,Ext. 213 '^,.N E S(\` 1 COUNTY OF CAINE1:2 RECEIVED 1 JUL 251990 July 19, 1990 CI I t yr c..ritiNHASSEN IIDear Municipality Administrator: 1 The State of Minnesota has demonstrated its interest in protecting youth from easy access to tobacco products by legislative action. 1 Several cities in Carver County have already taken action by totally banning or restricting cigarette vending machines through local ordinance. I The Carver County Community Health Board and Community Health Services Advisory Committee would like to encourage each municipality to examine the benefits of an ordinance which would 1 prohibit cigarette vending machines in your community, thus protecting youngsters from such easy access to tobacco. The second request is that you carefully examine the new law in 1 Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 325E, which is attached. We hope that your policy makers will look at each issue and give I serious attention to enactment of ordinances and the law which could bear long term benefits in cost and controlling the leading cause of premature death from heart disease and certain cancers. I15 ncerely. I6%' ' _% Earl Gnan /Chairman Carver Co my Board of Commissioners Iand Community Health Board W,j,cc. )01,-, I • Alice Evans, Chair Carver County Community Health Services Advisory Committee IEG/AE/yo - Enclosure 1 IIAffirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer .c. `:.�} T - »:nom - '• I -}; �: - MN= Community Ordinances to Restrict .}F. ., :. .- Cigarette Vending Machines II Total Sans on Cigarette Vending Machine Sales -- ADOPTED :Total o ulation covered by P P these ordinances : 416,495 • -4,..(t- '=.--e-:: °T 10% of State Populat 0 ion -h 1.-•White Bear Lake 11. Coon Rapids - t--' 2 . Chanha 12. Richfield . Kenyon 13. Cokato 4. Northfield - 14. Brooklyn Park 5. Bloomington 15. Waconia - 6. St. Louis Park 16. Owatonna • 7. St. Cloud 17. Orono 8. Milaca :18. Golden Valley - 9. Mora • li 10. Brooklyn Center Partial Restrictions on Cigarette Vending Machine Sales - I ADOPTED Total population covered by these ordinances : 924,134 22% of State Population 1. Big Lake 12. Cannon Falls 2. Blaine 13. Hutchinson ' 5. ` -- 3. New Brighton 14. Champlin _ 4. Deer River 15. Jackson - 5. Redwood Falls 16. Preston 6. - Shoreview 17. Red Wing I - 7 . Minneapolis 18. Excelsior 8. St. Paul 19. Worthington 9. Duluth 20. Kasson 10. West St. Paul 21. Austin - II11. Anoka -- ' Other Cities with Ordinances under Consideration Total population covered by these ordinances : 102,653 2% of State Population 1. Faribault - - II 2. North St. Paul 3. Monticello 4 . New Ulm -- _ I5. Rochester j4 Communities, representing 1 .4 million residents and 34.$ Di the - II population, already have taken action or are considering action to restrict cigarette vending machines. Above information is based on a phone survey of a Minnesota communities?2,000 population completed between March 6 and IApril 5.1990 by the University of Minnesota School of Public Health. (5/10190) I CAMPBELL, KNUTSON, SCOTT & FUCHS, P.A. 1/41 P4¢k- IAttorneys at Law RECEIVED I Thomas I. Campbell JUL 3 0 1990 Roger N. Knutson (612) 456-9539 Thomas Nl. Scott ,Facsimile (612) 456-9542 Gary G. Fuchs CITY OF CHANHASSEN I James R. Wilsron Elliott B. Knetsch July 27, 1990 Dennis J. Unger IIMs. Jean Meuwissen 41 7 / l�Chanhassen City Hall - i/aG a/ f P. O. Box 147 0 •()?I Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: City of Chanhassen vs. Roger A. Pauly, et al. ICarver County District Court File No. 89-24805 Dear Jean: I The Commissioners ' hearing in the above referenced condemna- tion matter was held in June, 1990. The Commissioners determined the value of the property taken to be $146 , 500 .00 . The date of I taking was December 31, 1989. Interest is owed on the principal amount at the rate of 7% per annum from December 31 , 1989. The Commissioners' award also included an award of $500.00 for Iappraisal fees. Please prepare a check made payable to the Carver County cpr Court Administrator in the amount of $146,500. 00 plus interest in 1, the amount of $5, 956.14 if payment is made on July 31, 1990. Per diem interest is $28. 09 and the interest should be increased accordingly for each day after July 31 that payment is made. In 16 addition, add $500. 00 for the appraisal fee. R° Payment of the total amount can be sent directly to the Court ,Ao' Administrator in Carver County, together with the enclosed trans- ' mittal letter. Vv�`;�fIf you have any questions, please feel free to call me or ctkRoger Knutson. $A'�� Very truly yours, ICAMPBELL, KNUTSON, SCOTT & FUCHS, P.A. IIBY: .SI - ary G. Fuchs I GGF/rwg Enclosure cc: \)4(.. Don Ashworth II IYankee Square Office III • Suite 202 • 3460 Washington Drive • Eagan, MN 55122 I ■ CAMPBELL, KNUTSON, SCOTT & FUCHS, P.A. ■ Attorneys at Law IThomas). Campbell Roger N. Knutson Thomas M. Scott (612) 456-953Q hry G. Fuchs Facsimile (612) 456-9542 I James R. Walston Elliott B. Knetsch Dennis). Unger IJuly 31, 1990 0 Ms. Joyce A. VanEyll O 4Jk. I Court Administrator Carver County Courthouse Chaska, MN 55318 IRe: City of Chanhassen vs. Roger A. Pauly, et al. Court File No. 89-24805 IDear Ms. VanEyll: Enclosed herewith is a check made payable to you from the I City of Chanhassen in full payment of the Commissioners ' award in the above referenced matter, together with interest from the date of taking and the $500.00 award for appraisal fees. This amount is being tendered to you for distribution pursuant to II Minnesota Statutes as there is some uncertainty regarding the interests held by the various defendants. I It is my understanding that the real estate taxes and installments of special assessments due and payable through calendar year 1989 have been paid in full. I request that you iverify that prior to disbursement of the funds. If you have any questions about this, please feel free to call me. Your courtesies and cooperation in this matter are I appreciated. Very truly yours, rCAMPBELL, KNUTSON, SCOTT & FUCHS, P.A. II BY: / ( 1 Gary G. Fuchs GGF:rwg IEnclosure cc: ° ir. Don Ashworth 1 IIYankee Square Office III • Suite 202 • 3460 Washington Drive • Eagan, MN 55122 1 1 1 1 1 1 VIINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT 1 ANNUAL REPORT FOR 1989 1 1 1 1 ' July, 1990 1 1 1 1 1 ! . IIINTRODUCTION This Annual Report of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District provides a summary of the major activities of the Board I of Managers during 1989 . Any person wishing additional information is encouraged to contact any individual manager . IITHE MANAGERS AND MEETING INFORMATION As of December 1989 , the Managers of the Minnehaha Creek IWatershed District were as follows : Robert Erickson 2800 McKenzie Pt . Road Term Expires Wayzata, MN 55391 March 8, 1990 IIAlbert L. Lehman 3604 West Sunrise Drive Term Expires* Minnetonka, MN 55345 March 8 , 1991 IClarkson W. Lindley 15500 Wayzata Blvd. Term Expires Wayzata, MN 53391 March 8, 1992 I C. Woodrow Love P. O. Box 524 Term Expires Excelsior, MN 55331 March 8, 1992 I Richard R. Miller 5340 Hollywood Road Term Expires Edina, MN 55436 March 8, 1991 I James R.. Spensley 5117 Chicago Avenue Term Expires Minneapolis , MN 55417 March 8, 1990 John E. Thomas 6326 Smithtown Road Term Expires IExcelsior, MN 55331 March 8, 1992 The officers for 1989 were: IJames R. Spensley President C. Woodrow Love Vice President John E. Thomas Secretary II Albert L. Lehman Treasurer During 1989 , twelve regular meetings were held by the I Managers on the third Thursday of every month at 7 :30 p.m. In order to make the meetings of the Managers more accessible to all residents of the District, the Managers meet in odd-numbered I months at the St . Louis Park City Hall, and in even-numbered months at the Wayzata City Hall. Increased enforcement and regulatory activity in 1989 required four additional special I meetings of the Managers . *Manager Lehman moved out of the District and resigned effective March 1990 . He was replaced by Manager Thomas Maple . I Managers Spensley and Erickson were reappointed to new three year terms in March 1990 . I ' The Managers exchanged information with other governmental units affected by the programs and policies of the District, and honored requests to attend meetings of municipal, county, and ' state officials, as well as meetings of interested citizens . The Managers received support and assistance from the Hennepin and Carver County Boards of Commissioners through the year which greatly assisted the District in carrying out its programs during ' 1989 . The Managers continued to work during 1989 with other ' organizations concerned with water resource issues . 'Manager Miller served on the Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force and the Board of Managers heard reports from the executive director of ' the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District concerning this problem weed, and other issues concerning Lake Minnetonka. Manager Lehman and the District Engineer served on the Technical Committee of the Hennepin Conservation District to develop. ' uniform erosion control guidelines . The Board participated in the activities of the Metropolitan Area section of the Minnesota Association of Watershed Districts, and in the deliberations of the annual state-wide meeting of the Association. The Managers supplied copies of minutes of all meetings and reports to interested citizens and to public officials throughout ' the District . Copies of the 1988 report were filed with the Minnesota Water Resources Board, the Department of Natural Resources, the Boards of County Commissioners of Hennepin and ' Carver Counties , and with State Senators and Representatives from the area within the District . ' • PERMIT APPLICATIONS The District received 207 permit applications during 1989 . Each application was reviewed in detail for compliance with the ' District ' s rules . Applications were received for projects such as dredging, shoreline erosion protection, stream and lake crossings , wetland and floodplain alteration, and stormwater ' management plans for site development. Prior to action on the applications , the District staff spent considerable effort with city staff and/or applicants to bring some of the proposed projects into compliance with District rules . A summary of the permits reviewed by the Board in 1989 is attached to this report as Appendix A, showing the project location and type of application received. As in previous years, a large majority of the applications received were from the Lake Minnetonka portion of the watershed district, reflecting the continuing urbanization- of this area of the District, ' and an increase in the number of dredging applications . - 2 - II All permits issued by the District require compliance with applicable municipal ordinances and, if the permit involves ' docking on Lake Minnetonka, the applicable ordinances of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District . In addition, permits issued by the watershed district require compliance with any applicable rules of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources . The Board of Managers also took action as necessary concerning complaints, permit violations, and activities which had been undertaken without a required permit from the District. HYDROLOGIC DATA COLLECTION ' The District continued its Hydrologic Data Collection Program during 1989 . The data for 1988 were published in the Annual Hydrologic Data Report in July 1989 . This is a I comprehensive program, which, along with data from other agencies , has formed a long-term data bank for use in managing the water resources of the District, particularly Lake Minnetonka ' and the Minneapolis city lakes . Copies of this report were submitted to the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources, the Metropolitan Council , the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Department of Natural Resources, the Fresh Water Biological ' Institute, and local government officials, citizens ' groups , and interested citizens . No major changes in water quality occurred during 1989 in Lake Minnetonka, and stream quality in the ' District also remained essentially unchanged from the prior year. iEADWATER$_DAM AND fLONTROL__STR�TCJ'URE [GRAY`s BAY) AND LAKE MINNETONKA ELEVATIONS/MINNEHAHA CREEK FLOWS ' During 1989 , the District operated the Headwaters Control Structure at Gray' s Bay under the management policy and ' operational plan as reapproved by the Department of Natural Resources in March 1986 . The District 's application to renew the permit for the control structure remained pending before the DNR in 1989 . Due to exceptionally low precipitation during 1989 , and abnormally dry conditions throughout the summer, the level of ' Lake Minnetonka remained low and the control structure remained closed throughout the year . Lake Minnetonka reached a low elevation of 926 .00 on November 3, and a high elevation of 928.20 ' on April 18. Due to the low lake level (below the established discharge elevation of 928.6) , no discharge from the Headwaters Control Structure occurred. The Managers continued to rely heavily upon participation of each of the municipalities on Minnehaha Creek in recording creek elevations and flows and reporting that data to the District . The District prepared monthly summaries of this data during the open water season and made the summaries available to interested municipalities and citizens . The assistance of each ' of the municipalities is invaluable to the District in making the necessary operational adjustments to accomplish the management objectives of the Headwaters Control Structure. ' - 3 - WA R 1 I MAMA EMENT • ' I •A0V ' I . ' During 1989, the District ' s proposed Chapter 509 Surface Water Management Plan was before Hennepin County for review, along with a proposed agreement concerning financing of the Capital Improvement Program. The District forwarded the Chapter ' 509 Plan to the Metropolitan Council for its review in March 1990 . REVISION OF THE DISTRICT'S RULES In April 1989 , the District adopted revisions to Rule E concerning dredging, and adopted Rule K providing for licensing ' of dredging contractors. These revisions were adopted following extensive meetings by the Board's Rules Committee, input from District staff and members of the public, and a public hearing on April 20, 1989 . ' The changes to Rule E arose from the District ' s experience with compliance problems and the need for more specific criteria ' concerning hydraulic dredging . Specifically, the revisions address hydraulic dredging standards, requirements for submission of soil boring logs , protection against seepage and subsurface drainage, the steepness of slopes in dredging projects necessary ' to avoid frequent re-dredging, and the use of silt curtains . Rule K requires the licensing of dredging contractors who ' perform projects in larger "priority" lakes within the District . The District had been concerned with unpermitted and unfeasible dredging projects performed in the past, and determined that the ' licensing of contractors is a reasonable and necessary means to ensure that projects are performed by qualified, dredging contractors in compliance with District rules . Rule K was also intended to protect consumers from engaging dredging contractors who do not have the necessary and proper equipment to perform the project . ' OTHER DISTRICT PROJECTS AND CONCERNS At the request of the City of Shorewood and the Village of Tonka Bay, the District studied the feasibility of various 11 alternative remedies to a persistent drainage problem at the intersection of Glen Road and County Road 19 . The District Engineer continued with additional hydrologic analysis in 1989, ' recommending a number of drainage improvements in this subwatershed area to be submitted for review by the City of Shorewood. ' Manager Spensley met extensively in 1989 with officials from the City of Minneapolis to review plans for storm sewer and paving projects near the intersection of 42nd Street and ' Bloomington Avenue, and Sibley Park. The District entered into a contract with the City in 1989 to perform a hydrologic analysis for this project, known as the HEC II study, which was completed in May 1990 . 11 - 4 - L T h e District began a monitoring p r og ram in 1989 as Phase I of a project to abate non-point source pollution of Long Lake. The District began this project in cooperation with the Cities of Orono and Long Lake, Hennepin County, and other interested parties pursuant to a Clean Water Partnership Grant with the ' Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Phase I of the project will be completed in 1990. 1990 BUDGET As required by law, the Managers held a duly noticed public hearing on September 28, 1989 concerning the proposed budgets for ' the District ' s Administrative Fund, Management Planning Fund, Water Maintenance and Repair Fund, and Survey and Data Acquisition Fund. Following the public hearing, the Managers ' adopted budgets for 1990 for these funds and certified tax levies to Hennepin and Carver counties for collection. ' EINANCIAL RECORDS The financial records of the District are kept by a certified public accountant . All financial transactions are ' recorded in the minutes of the District 's meetings . The Treasurer of the District maintained separate records ' for the following four funds in 1989 : (1) The Administrative Fund; (2) The Management Planning Fund; (3) The Water Maintenance and Repair Fund; and (4) The Survey and Dgta Acquisition Fund. Records for each of these funds include the dates and amounts of ' all expenditures, the names of individuals receiving payment, and the purposes for which payment is made. ' The official depository for the District is the Wayzata State Bank, in Wayzata, Minnesota. ' During 1989 , the financial records of the District were audited for the year 1988 and a copy of the audit was filed with the State Auditor for the State of Minnesota in April, 1989 . A copy of the combined statement of revenue and expenditures for the year 1989 is attached to this report as Appendix B, and a copy of the complete financial statement is available upon request . Respectfully submitted, James R. Spensley, President Board of Managers of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District ' ALPS105 - 5 - Ir 1989 PERMIT APPLICATIONS 1 ssss===== =======s==:=s=--nsnn ==ass===========nnnn=============s======s======= MUNICIPALITY TYPE OF PERMIT B C D E F G TOTAL I i=====_1 _- __===== == CHANHASSEN 4 2 2 •L 8 DEEPHAVEN 1 3 4 EDINA 2 2 II EXCELSIOR 1 2 1 4 GOLDEN VALLEY 0 GREENWOOD 2 10 12 HOPKINS 3 3 I INDEPENDENCE 1 1 LAKETOWN TWP. 0 LONG LAKE 0 MAPLE PLAIN 1 1 2 I MEDINA 1 1 MINNETONKA 14 1 4 3 22 MINNEAPOLIS 4 4 MINNETONKA BEACH 1 1 I MINNETRISTA 1 1 8 10 MOUND 2 12 7 21 ORONO 10 13 13 1 37 PLYMOUTH 2 2 4 I RICHFIELD 0 ST. BONIFACIUS 0 ST. LOUIS PARK 8 1 9 SHOREWOOD 4 7 3 1 15 SPRING PARK 1 2 3 II TONKA BAY 1 8 4 2 15 VICTORIA 4 1 9 14 WAYZATA 7 3 3 13 WOODLAND 1 1 2 II s=====___----___==____=====s======s=========ass=====a====s====a===ass==a========_= TOTAL PERMITS 68 1 3 61 69 5 207 s==c=s==========s s===========__=====s=====_____________=====sa==s=a====ns=== PERMIT APPLICATION CATEGORIES IIB= STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANS E= DREDGING C= FLOODPLAIN ALTERATION F= SHORELINE IMPROVEMENT II D= WETLAND ALTERATION G= STREAM AND LAKE CROSSING 1 II II II IIEXHIBIT A I MUNI • ASSOCIATES LTD. I. I I CREEK WalatI ED MD= C121212,FD SJII OF F tE, EXIIMTICRES RD=MD ACM, KR 71£YEAR II•TED EERIER 31, 1983 IWater Meru !le smaax ar.virata metal Over Actual Iciainistratike Rr Art Part tirsT Ards 1983 (Uri r) Art Sitt I REAM 119c Satlarents (ttte 2) $ 125,336 $ 111,682 $ 17,036 $ S 254,056 $ 252,500 S 1,556 Interest and 0 tte• 8,123 3,295 2,668 3,647 17,733 17,733 II133,461 U4,977 19,705 3,647 • 271,783 252,500 19,289 ECFENDZIIRES Hydmlqgical Data rnh1nrt;,z, I rata tal �, 25,605 24,fJ:D 1,605 Ac�rristratiaT I &Meiling 24,495 3,361 27,876 24,OCD 3,876 2,U5 2,500 ( 365) Ansur r asi A rlitirg 8,427 1,500 9,927 8,500 1,427 I Prgireacirg General 27,103 53,911 81,CQ0) 64,000 17,Cid0 Hgir Tg, F ssm.t Feria., 54,839 54,899 40,Cn0 14,839 , � 14,467 6,182 20,649 8,000 12,649 Legal 59,878 12,072 71,950 40,000 31,950 I Hams Par Diaz&&pems 10,242 10,242 70 12,500 ( 2,258) *""` 42 12,500 ( 12,430) Otter 1,500 ( 1,403) *facial Projects D®C rItxol Son=Mainrssre I Get Jcpliaricri A 1,143 1,143 1,143 Board Initiates Projects 2D,500 (2),500) 271,E 1012,651 1,143 305,496 S 258,000 S 47,496 ' *mess (Ddicia ry) tf Raveas a a� _! Over Experrliaxes S ( 68,241) $ 12,326 $ 19,704 S 2,504 $( 33,707) ISE 1,011E511)MAZE&SII1333 ZES 4 I I I I IEXHIBIT B 1 CITY OF t CHANHASSEN ' 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 1 1 July 27, 1990 Minnesota Commissioner of Highways Attn: Mr. Joel Katz District Traffic Engineer ' 5801 Duluth Street Golden Valley, MN 55422 Re: Request for Speed Study in Pheasant Hill Addition PW262 Dear Mr. Katz : The City has received requests from a group of concerned residents in the neighborhood of Pheasant Hill Addition regarding speed. Due to the roadway geometrics, the City believes this ' area may warrant lower speed limits. At the July 23, 1990 Chanhassen City Council meeting, the Council adopted the attached resolution requesting the Minnesota ' Commissioner of Transportation to perform said traffic investigation in the Pheasant Hill Addition. I have also attached a copy of a location map for your convenience. As noted ' on the location map, I've highlighted all of the streets in the neighborhood. However, our specific concerns are isolated to the streets listed below: ' 1. Pheasant Hill Drive from Galpin Blvd. (C. R. 117) to Ringneck Drive. 2. White Dove Drive from Pheasant Drive to Wood Duck Lane. 3 . Ringneck Drive from Cardinal to Wood Duck Lane. i Mr. Joel Katz July 27 , 1990 ' Page 2 ' Your attention in this matter is greatly appreciated. If you have additional questions concerning this request or need need additional information, please let me know. Sincerely, CITY OF CHANHASSEN ' 4 David C. Hempel Sr. Engineering Technician DCH: jms Attachments : 1. Resolution No. 90-87 2 . Location map c: Scott Harr, Public Safety Director Gary Warren, City Engineer Charles Folch, Assistant City Engineer Admin. Packet - 8/13/90 V . 1 I City of Chanhassen Carver and Hennepin Counties, Minnesota ' DATE: July 23, 1990 RESOLUTION NO: 90-87 MOTION BY: Boyt SECONDED BY: Workman A RESOLUTION REOUESTING MNDOT TO PERFORM A SPEED STUDY IN PHEASANT HILL ADDITION ' WHEREAS, residents of the Pheasant Hill Addition have requested a reduced speed limit in their neighborhood for safety purposes; and ' WHEREAS, the City of Chanhassen supports this request due to roadway geometries in this neighborhood. ' NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council hereby requests the Minnesota Department of Transportation to perform an engineering and traffic investigation to determine ' reasonable and safe speed limits in the Pheasant Hill Addition. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that after the Minnesota Department of Transportation completes said study, that this item be forwarded to ' the Public Safety Commission for review. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 23rd ' day of July, 1990. ATTEST: IIIP 1 ' Don Ashworth, City Clerk/Manager 'oald hmiel, Mayor na EQ ABSENT Chmiel None None Bovt Workman Johnson Dimler I 1 • I �a ; LILAC LANE =�.� ' • • s • ; • • •1 � is :. . cm fctio 1 , \71VZi�.�.c- �� mi. 1 -ICADE , �� �� -_wr yy=r= NOV i K I rte '4444: titian - gioll! .Lit ��, at II anal- ibiwt3` cr ERR 'H��( :- �W MENEM Mi5EV44.., 1 1 iiINF: 1191.e.in viktitr4 )■,/ I ELE,Tvirma _pa. ® -� NE � vivre ,�_� �-.. All r� ■ Cr _1� a ,r�r t ?-4' NO SCA LP LINW I i IR % �"1!III op Pp . 44 . •ARUM, COURT °�R CC PA• ROUE ND 1 LAKE IN- 11 .,.,.., , , s .,:— ,. r 7,17... .0, ,... „ , I 1$401111 P N. I lit 4011111111111! I c - . pr? ANN ___, LC LAKE LUCY B l torN �- 1 / ,•siitaktibi - r.��;NE min w gas111j .. o �``. soES°. • r I ,. PARK 0 I - MEADOW LAKE A NM GREEN P4RK :,2 \ _ III z ; . r • / Li + )( t �� i I ill� :. 1 • TRAFFIC CONTROL •▪ . STUDY AREA 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN I 1 1 Eitj 1 I I PLANNING A . TRANSPO EE ION I URBAN DESIGN BRW.INC. THRESHER SQUARE 700 THIAD STREET SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS.MINNESOTA 55415 PHONE 672 370.0700 FAX 612 3701378 I ,er.:7 2 s1.`'*+y.RL' .mow & -. "..0r-;•Y'ic_3_,-,.-s-t:,. ..6,-ar ,1.:-_y.-.:r .:ri;t.`S",w,F •-s. I DATE: July 10, 1990 MEMORANDUM TO: Noble Nursery ATTN: Tracy IFROM: Todd Wichman O . . I RE: Chanhassen Phases I and II Staking and Guying Inspection 1 . Today I met with Tracy to review tree staking and guying, as well as any addi- I tional work that still needs to be completed in ;downtown Chanhassen. The following items were noted: I PHASE I „ 1) West 78th Street - Several trees require straightening and staking or re- staking. Locations include: 1 - Northwest corner of West 78th Street and Laredo Drive - Two Linden - - Northeast corner of West 78th Street and Laredo Drive - Two Linden I _ - Southeast parking island, south side of West 78th Street near Furniture Gallery - Red Oak ' In addition to the above-mentioned tree locations, several trees have not been finished in regard to staking along West 78th Street. Tracy mentioned that she would have a crew finish this up. Any and all trees replaced this spring that 11 are not plumb should be straightened and staked. I would like to have this crew I check all existing stakes and guy wires and tighten and repair them if necessary. Remove stakes that are no longer necessary to trees that are firmly rooted in. Tracy will supervise these items. I ; 2) Great Plains Boulevard - Two Lindens in front of Pauly's building need to be straightened and staked. I : 3) Public Parking Lot - East side of Great Plains Boulevard. 9 Several Spruce need to be straightened and staked. These trees should be mulched with woodchip mulch and any holes and bare areas adjacent to these trees filled I ,' and sodded. I .2 ►, '�iz' 1` ��°nr:iF'I'':d!t`:t..r�=i.i-f-i'c'-'"0.`Y.--:Sw::�'Y,-:.--sv-i-.i�..--..i..dw::�.-=rc,'.y- �0=.:1‹ IMINNEAPOUS DENVER PHOENIX TUCSON ST.PETERSBURG f . Noble Nursery July 10, 1990 ' Page 2 Tracy will notify me when this work is to commence. I have asked her to be pre- sent the day the crews are working in order to make sure all items (both on this list and your list) are completed satisfactorily. 1 PHASE II 1) West 79th Street - The majority of trees appear to have been staked and appear plumb. At least two Norway Maple need to be straightened on the north side of the street near the proposed bank site. Several of the 8' Colorado Spruce planted on the south side of the street near the small detention pond are crooked and should be straightened and ' staked. 2) Market Street - The juniper bed on the:west side of Market Street should be edged, and fabric and mulch should be installed. I will talk to Greg Roy next week to determine what needs to be done with the island median planting area. This area was not in the original ' contract, and any work will have to be handled as a new item. Two Fairview Linden need to be replaced on the west side of the street, just north of the railroad tracks. Tracy mentioned that these would more than likely be a fall replacement item. A severe weed problem exists on the west facing slope to the pond area on the west side of Market Street. This area was originally proposed to be seeded as the other pond slopes and is currently in an unacceptable con- dition. I will talk to Greg Roy in regard to this item as well. 3) Dinner Theater Stage Sign - All of the Colorado Spruce should be staked and several need to be straightened as well. Sod has slipped in a couple areas and should be adjusted and staked in the steep areas. To the north edge of ' the parking area, edging, fabric and mulch need to be installed around an existing transformer box. TW/ks • I 1 I a 1 - L, PLANNING TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING URBAN DESIGN BRW.WC THRESHER SQUARE • 700 THIRD STREET SOUTH • MINNEAPOLIS.MINNESOTA 55415 • PHONE 612/370-0700 FAX. 612/370-1378 ' July 23, 1990 Mr. Al Johnson Midwest Asphalt Company ' 6401 Industrial Drive Hopkins, MN 55343 RE: Downtown Chanhassen - Phase II C.P. 66-11B Dear Mr. Johnson: The following is a partial punchlist for items of work relating to the above- mentioned project. This punchlist does not include items for sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water main, streets or concrete work. A separate punchlist for ' those items will be issued shortly. 1. Replace missing sod at southeast corner of Dinner Theater lot. ' 2. Pick up pallets, posts, pipe, wood chips, black dirt and debris. at southeast corner of Dinner Theater lot. 3. Straighten spruce trees at stage sign. 4. Pick up sod and black dirt at island in Dinner Theater lot. ' 5. Repair sod areas along east edge Dinner Theater lot; the match to existing sod areas is poor. 6. Complete the plant bed at the irrigation controller, east edge of Dinner Theater lot. 7. Straighten and guy all leaning trees. 8. Remove sand, gravel and concrete from around signposts, place black dirt and seed. • 9. Straighten all signposts. 10. Remove paint from face of wooden signposts. 11. Pick up rock at West Holiday entrance, West 79th. AN AFFILIATE OF THE BENNETT.MOROSE.WOLSFELD.JARVIS.INC..GRD, DAVID J BENNETT DONALD w RINGROSE RICHARD P WOLSFELD PETER E JARVIS THOMAS F CARRELL CRAIG A AMLTOSEN DONALD E HUNT MARK G SWENSON ' JOHN B MCNAMARA RICHARD D PILGRIM DALE N BECKMANN DENNIS J SUTLFF JEFFREY L BENSON RALPH C BLUM DAVID L.GRAHAM GARY J ERICKSON MINNEAPOLIS DENVER PHOENIX TUCSON ST.PETERSBURG SAN DIEGO • a a II ' Mr. Al Johnson July 23, 1990 Page 2 ' 12. Remove sand, gravel and concrete from around street signs, place black dirt and seed. ' 13. Pick up wire, hose laying around trees. 14. Remove straw and debris from all CB and apron inlets. 15. Pick up concrete chunks and metal post, east side Market Boulevard, north of railroad tracks. 16. Pick up dirt pile, east side Market Boulevard, south of railroad tracks. 17. Pick up broken adjusting rings and debris on berm, east side Market, south of railroad tracks. 18. Pick up dirt pile, sand bags, sod and debris, northeast corner West 79th and Market. 19. Pick up loader forks, north side West 79th. ' 20. Replace damaged and missing sod, northeast corner West 79th and Market. 21. Replace missing sod, West 79th near 30 mph sign. 22. Remove dirt piles and repair ruts behind sod, West 79th, West of MGM driveway. 23. Fill hole at light base, northeast corner of Hotel , West 79th. 24. Straighten ash tree, clean dirt off wood chips, northwest corner Hotel , West 79th. 25. Pick up concrete chunks, dirt piles, south side West 79th near low point in road. 26. Repair erosion at ponds, black dirt and seed. 27. Pick up concrete chunks, wood, wire and debris near controller cabinet, ' south side West 79th. 28. Repair broken streetlight wire, south side West 79th near controller cabi- net. 29. Remove form tubes from light bases, clean dirt from under poles at tops of 1 bases. 1 1 Mr. Al Johnson July 23, 1990 • Page 3 30. Tighten and replace all missing bolts on decorative streetlights. (Bolts to be hex head, color to match poles.) 31. Provide keys for locking receptacle covers on decorative streetlights, lock ' all covers. ' 32. Complete project signing ("Keep Right," "Do Not Enter" and "Left Turn Lane" near TH 5). 33. Place CL5 along bituminous, each Market Boulevard radius to TH 5. 34. Repair erosion at northeast corner Market Boulevard and TH 5. 35. Repair erasion at outfall structure (West Pond). 36. Pick up dirt piles, dead sod, grade and seed boulevard, west side Market. 37. Grade level , fabric and woodchip island on Market. 38. Complete plant beds west side Market (no edging, no mulch). ' 39. Grade, seed access trail to pond, west side Market, south of railroad tracks. 40. Pick up bituminous and dirt piles, west side Market, north of railroad tracks. 41. Prune, straighten and guy damaged tree, southeast corner Market and Bowling Alley Road (Noble). 42. Clean up plant staging area west side of Market Boulevard., Please coordinate all punchlist work with Greg Roy of BRW. II Sincerely, B I . agz 1 . G A. ret, PE Project Manager GE/jkh cc: Gary Warren ;Greg Roy File: 7-8815 1 � t3 _ 90 t t74 C Y Chaska _ ' July 25, 1990 Mr. Todd Gerhardt Administrative Assistant City of Chanhassen 690 Coulter Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Todd: ' Enclosed please find a summary of programs supplied to Triax Cable Vision by Chaska Community Television for the 1989-1990 school year. ' Chaska Community Television provided 24 District #112 programs to Triax for playback in Chanhassen out of 28 programs originally scheduled as per our agreement. ' Four programs not recorded due to staff requirements. District 112 cancelled one program, but we sent a substitute program to Triax in its place. A wrestling ' match was replaced with a boy's basketball game. On behalf of the Chaska Community Access Corporation and the City of Chaska I thank you for the opportunity to work with the City of Chanhassen and I look forward to continued relations. Sincerely, Terrance J. ucera Cable Coordinator RECEIVED nlo Enclosure JUL31 1990 E CRY OF CHANHASSEN City Of Chaska Minnesota One City Hall Plaza 55318-1962 Phone 612/448-2851 1 REVISED SEPTEMBER 1989 ' 1 r ti Chaska 24 programs distributed to r d„ Triax cablevision out of 28 originally scheduled Videotape Schedule of District 112 Events Chaska High School 1989 - 1990 September: 1 Football ' 12 Girls Soccer ;5 Football 18 Counseling,Night ' 25 Coronation/Parade 26 Swimming 27 Parents Welcome - not recorded 29 Football 30 Volleyball _ not recorded ' October: 3 Cross Country 18 Football 23 Volleyball November: 17 Debate Tournament _ not recorded 28 Wrestling ' December: 14 Christmas Concert II January: 8 Counseling Night 9 Basketball 13 Boys Basketball February 3 Wrestling - replace with Boy' s Basketball 5 Ninth grade registration 12 Junior and Senior registration - not recorded Winterfest Coronation 16 Girls Basketball March: 12 Counseling Night - District 112 cancelled, episode of 20 Band Concert "Hawk Talk" was sent instead April: May: 5 Prom June: 5 Senior Awards 7 Graduation City Of Chaska Minnesota One City Hall Plaza 55318-1962 ` Phone 612.448-2851 -4 I CITYOF ._ ilii, ClIANIIASSEN 1 • rr. • 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 de_ At,14'4, nisi MEMORANDUM _ 1 1 TO: PMT Addition File FROM: Dave Hempel, Sr. Engineering Technician,< II DATE: August 2 , 1990 II SUBJ: PMT Addition Land Use File 90-13 IIUpon site inspection today, I noticed the erosion control efforts on site are grossly lacking. The contractor, DKH Excavating, has filled the majority of the site without extending the storm sewer I as requested in the Development Contract in Conditions of Approval fOr the site. That afternoon's thunderstorm had washed sand and silt through the storm sewer and into the ditch to the I catch basin on the north property line. Erosion control measures around that catch basin were deficient. Storm water carrying silt and sediment was running directly into the catch basin underneath the silt fence that they had previously installed I around the catch basin. I had pointed this_ out to the job superintendent (David) and requested that the silt fence be reinstalled and hay bales staked to prevent such erosion. He I informed me that this would be done today or first thing in the morning. I told him that I would be checking on the site daily for compliance with the erosion control measures as stated on the I grading plan, and if the site was not in conformance the project could be subject to a stop work order until the erosion control measures were completed. I jms c: Building Department I Paul Krauss, City Planne Gary Warren, City Engineers j e- : T3,2 a 0 6 gt.41"2-r14/ c/-1--■ RI Lr317 Pit 114-11 1-4)'“). I CITY OF CHANHASSEN 1 . - 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147• CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 1 (612) 937-1900 •FAX (612) 937-5739 August 7, 1990 1 Mr. Ed Willson 3530 Maplewood Circle Excelsior, MN 55331 Re: Maplewood Circle Street Lights File No. 003A ' Telephone No. 470-1061 Dear Mr. Willson: i apologize for the delay in this response. Based on our telephone conversation on Monday, August 6, 1990, I thought it best to document our discussions and provide you with the enclosed information for your use. You expressed interest to me in having the street light at the ' end of Maplewood Circle replaced and lit. We discussed the alternatives available in accomplishing this. The results of my research indicate that, as noted in the attached Maplewood Covenants , page 2 , article 13, "The owner of each lot in Maplewood shall be obligated for the payment of one-eighth (1/8) of the cost of maintaining and operating any street or street entrance lighting and shall pay his portion of said cost to such resident in Maplewood who shall be selected by the residents therein to receive such payments. " ' In 1973 , the City received the attached November 15 letter from Mr. G. E. Kruse requesting that the City install street lights on Maplewood Circle. You will find enclosed the City's response ' dated February 26, 1974 wherein the City Council at that time reviewed the request but denied it based on the Maplewood Covenant which requires the individual property owners to be responsible for the costs of the street lighting. Evidently ' based on this response the property owners then contracted to install the current private lighting system. i I am sympathetic to your concern, Mr. Willson, and after visiting the area Wednesday evening, concur that it is definitely a dark area . Apparently, as you informed me, the street light which exists in the cul-de-sac at the end of the road has not worked I ' Mr. Ed Willson August 7, 1990 Page 2 for quite some time and the wiring and such is in such a state ' that the light would need to be replaced before it can be put back in service. If the City Council were agreeable to reconsidering the Maplewood Covenants and agreed to take on the street lighting on this roadway, the costs associated with t repairing/replacing the dead light and bringing up the other portion of the lighting system to NSP standards would by rights be borne by the eight property owners referenced in the ' covenants. In my opinion , the more direct/least costly alternative would be ' for your association to contract separately for repairs to the existing system. As I mentioned, if you are interested in the Council considering this matter, a petition should be prepared and submitted to my attention stating the requested action. I hope I have been of some help to you in this matter. If I can be of further assistance, please call . ' Sincerely, CITY OF CHANHASSEN ()0(...0"--"\\ 1 ' G Warren, P.E. C - ngineer GGW:ktm tAttachments: 1. Maplewood Covenants. 2 . November 15 , 1973 letter from G. E. Kruse. ' 3. February 26 , 1974 letter from the City. c: Maplewood Circle property owners (w/attachments) City Council Administrative Packet ( 8/13/90) 1 1 I r�:'.` .7 � ±M+-.-s r... <� S .�c'1�..r�'. ti 4v. N.n- :t i7 . �' P.7t'h'e a''C i rsl.f��i.1,%=::+<::✓, ':Y;+i. ,a.�;.� iw R.�,";!r 1.4:�:n� .r„� � �;,, �1:y,�;'' A ..e r(3.;�:A r'�cz.:',�.�,frl;`+, 't':•. 6•n;�;,t.•�•�_���'r�^+�a•_y,-r^�4..�. Y : : .rte I�»="n( • �3'°' .`�` rL•� ....• :4047,1:,�r c-i'-�'+,, •�;,".��.; -.�+r':;�7��ti y�:�:�:�• '' ; :.&:•ireg .:IWis:•si....t...iwC.il+3sµY�.b.•...:�+i.i. _ '; Ir.•M.M....Mr ' page2. 6. Before commencing construction of a dwelling on any lot in Maplewood, the approval must ci upon said blueprints owner or contractor shall subomlma complete losetsigned appnts and specifications for such _N. dwelling to said Molter R. Y 9Q blueprints and specifications must be kept on the and specifications, and raider period of construction. . I job at all times during the p Maplewood must 7. All electric and telephone service into each dwelling in Map Ri: be underground and no overhead wires orpower poles may be erected therein. Jr I upon any lot in Maplewood. B. No dogs, cats, or any other animal may be kept Maplewood,or any resident The said Walter R. Y objection utst or the owner of any lot in J:, therein, may make objection to any violation of this restriction iving notice hereo Iin writing and may institute legal proceedings to compel of this section. r; I 9. No commercial activity of any kind may be undertaken or'carried on upon • any lot in Maplewood. Maplewood, the planting a 10. in order to maintain the beau and luniformity ackbrry an ple white ash e prohibited.planting I of cottonwood, popors, willows, silver maple, A. wat boxelder 11. The accumuiation of rubbish: trash, boards, woodpiles, ashes, prunings, barrels, and all unsightly material of any kind on no lot is pro ibitevr.e,No thing"tree of $ I houses" or platforms in trees may be constructed any kind may be kept upon the lawn which makes it ugly, objectionable y, unsi htl g Y+ an oi 1. to any resident in Maplewood. No trailer ma be toned or kept any of lot ootsidet of the garage. A boat may be stored dui g may not be so stored between May 1st and November 1st. Lawns must be properly main- ' to ined and not be permitted to become unsightly. fi�h dwelling the 12. As a port of the construction and comapcceo drive chin Maplewood Lwnerto shall construct, and thereafter maintain, a private the garage which shall be surfaced.with either concrete or asphalt. No other surfacing shall be used. r:` 13. The owner of each lot in Maplewood shall be obligated for the payment of I one-eighth (1/8)of the cost of maintaining and operating any street or street entranace be lighting and shall pay his portion of said cost to such resident in Maplewood who shll I selected by the residents therein to receive such payments. Igr 14. The owner of any lot in Maplewood, or any resident therein, or the said �`: Wolter R. Youngquist may, by giving 10 days'notice by registered mail: demand-the and may discontinuance th ffuulfiilment of any of thefp ovisions violation contained herei on and maytbring '.4 I and may demand the proper compel compliance with any and with =.- legel action in any court of o er to wrap mp all the provisions of these covenants. °7 '_ IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, Walter R. Youngqu1st and Selma R. Youngq'1st 1964.have hereunto set their hands and seals this //6 day of �(•�T', I, , • ' • } IIn Presence Of. /JJ� . • i ii,(/) • ..44,et e . ert . s I. liiL'-c+*urtaN er werlOW111f n 1 'ti atdtP of l�ti a ota, •4 I IJFDIN - N. • , County of----fir i C_-.....s... vs)64 s..#,., vwt Notory Public—.r_ `,r: r :• .,'a i. ,?`r•3C`; s:.a�1�,. _,,ti,.I,..I ft•^' a,t.;ar,.! Al.,,:-. ^,.. O 1-�:V ':C: :n"s' r� f ,• v .1,i.'! �. .•.:�A rr r•'..A'i•�f� r"�.i I?::''?,,. :«Z.,'•'_i?''J,"r;:. ':• 'vr "`�%�•t�.•' :+n L.. ,.✓:'v,.n;- :,�;�•k,;� a; '1,. �•,_r. :.; �...y`•a, e r.•�.r,.,` %iM ;r i;,�is •e. .^i "! :?.;i;p� E.7. t'i ';i:y,;,y,. +'•r. ;is ,;;;'. ei :ii; i Y,r;,Vw;.; p:•,;;.,���s�:?p:•,r. , 'Ks.,. ..<r.'' 1� i"^.:;'.YiE:,, ;t, ..v' r'C a' :;'1» F•w• �•Sr�',..Fw S-•., N. ' ti �.vw.',,;,,a��v:'-. f.�;: I i� ' :'� -''i-'•)i'�@'.� :J,• '?.. +�v �'?����. �,,,,�Yta... :;�>•: •r'f'r`��w:. t� �y�'-'•f..»., 3 :.�'�':i I'= ej nF„e•F ` :.:, ,-rte:,i� .4l . ;{r\:lw, . �'✓'•• ij'':r•^,.J 'G,'�:;' r.' '•• .t. �•i, .Ya i::7' „\..''Y.'r`i: .0l1\. ./'>' ,.,i`\ .`� '.y!`rt:�r,:.'•'l}.,. j:,\'• t, L'. •\• �'.fJ! n•/;:ti/ t. .,fiL°a::�� a,,•'s � .yn..• ..i �"''•�wTr.�+� - e,, tti,.: .��..1•rX..�:'y ice`"^<i3,y„"•,i/�±r.•:':.•rr ��• '•.i•' '�'q':r).' �£ �4n. 5.:.2:s C�:?i :-3 C'`**y�: .: �,tYtx,.,e! Sti�.,i?rA�.r1y"�.- :'•�.. ,'•>jr �'S%y;•S-. ', µ : it•.^.'4,4.:.$t-'S,�w'�..'r l:. t a'i"•1,-. .1:S;ti y..7ci:"F kar ,?.,`.c,. 7-;,.4 93':- -'..i,�' a. !'• -... :"...1 44.:=:- `K ,.,.P•„,..::...:-,p.;5.:.,;• ;,•C[•'a>.-p•'i�y'r:,X1.X;1�iF��:'hLi��`J'%L�-•�+.'u..�•';ti;:f` .s.2.:• ,r,��..5.1,:x •(_aw*` ,... %�', r,�3'"�:ct. 3 . :w•>4•n+iY:i4:i;;' j:t �y-z..e.;,z:ca;.:•a,:iw• �. • �Yom, , J,:l i. . : r• ` ': �!. :t. iz,s:,-•Rw.:r•i^.>: `i;:e. --;.: iy I 3T k t 1-ti,:i. �••t' c s;� 7''"• `,FO � �;;•? t: ... 7�•'�'� ,,.,..,, •�.. g.;;;CI'k „ r�;:yl ,q•• •. 4,• 7;..1..;, . .ti K:,...y. cF i n , 'C'•r'..•?: S•C � �...! .. ad! `� ,i �C ;: .;mss r y'1•rV ...e:.,. F':�e 'tM y,e, }� p%+ �°0,3�.:•C :7�y, 4� ., i, cv.j,. .C•lar,•*�i::r.+�r...�'+'�%.:�:r 1 •.i,.� 4�:. .; •'+<:,•,ti'..•+... 1►a^ � � ^? ,••,' 1?.� �.'•�: a faY. � 5 y,L't •.ar'..•. F.•_.,SrC � ,nr • •G�. Y� '„'lam: � 'v a. �"� .S;'1,•,..ti, ,1'„7•t{�a r ;.;.c4;;k;k v, °x•,:k.,'.:),':' •Jrh•i;S.l•::h `•?ri�,7''': \. 'r. a d•a% •y' ``c:-;r�^;n«;1 7'.L ..i -ti• ,µ., .c: �.�• -•s '<K r. ., to llltiti��) � ;:• I T�C:J.f:t•r ;.S.S.'•C �. {_ s'i.� •f��^' fb:: �"�-'".., rr^t Ye;,.J A. '{ ,�, 1 r. �•.'��"�,.`�'• :`.''0,:nt:'s'i%.si•'7-.n:.s '�1.r4a :�.�•a:aM'J:•;' i'�'":'1;',:. t ^� �'' •�'� ' V 't :�•'�`,``� �•�••�, �y ::LN C_` Ji •.__;vl. � �..t,: l� ? ..�.;-• n °-�'.'4, f �"-ri�2'.:M.�!. ?.1 �iT•' :,•,y:ra'r` - r5�.�;` b"X�_y'y ✓.,win.::._.1°•"+.!.i:p er`...4.1;T::r. ,,,,. 1:•y...,-.<� . ' ]" l:N y f�! j •-A J w.,,sar:-_ 5+'• :A^ ,'r- i.•!:'v'• ,,;•,7, '.'rk.,.. "j .y ��Q .-Ti;,". .tC�. c; • c• •<f:y A'. ?Y .TS V'= vS: •>': 'O h}ri,e±^i A !C _-... .•••(...1.11,-;;:or. a t1; 'X,7i ti%..$7\- ! ,, r•:,. ,z+ri'.'r,,�+K1• K.4.rt;".,-(„6.t:$,; ion "�,f.�,J ap•..te i. ..lt" ':L',•�,. �;:G:<••:��,°,fvt tt �`,�..,. yy..,�,...�:iS` x1.,4`: � .t.t: � •�"'aPti � .. v all..,�1"T0:-;∎ . :r ill •a_ Iyy w4,:.• ..;s "''y... �P ..•-.rte ...'=f • .fa., - ,. (14: .:e..Y`f:•`1L. Jf' "r:r ••. ►y1l`,W�:.r.!,_ •• sF 'ti' +fir fv���? �µ=^. yn r.r', 4 �v�3.t-.��., Y . ..'hf:F�:�vC"'.x;;.:.C: iii -1-„,.. ,-,r .• '}�.. v�`t :•fir-�-,,,•41-:c� ,;'its, .. I aw ' °Yf,: ;� : ;yT ': '1I•L a S*..t.,....:%-Q�,-.- .4,5^',.V" '4`. -.• hf N:.-•'",.S%•- : , Y_ j2... ;{.�+/ ' ,. �r�.Y;��...;'� .r.Se 'tl4,.:; .' -,:, Tr-�t'-AR•44.e ft^r.` .ii-v: •. o. ,r ,s. : 'S 'l 3S=G,Y'i �••f� `'i: Y: l, `M•iwr::. ,.V•+74,y.�. '1l':�::'lr' ti�. Z '.j��. !/'r•[- 1^ �+ f v..i '1 'a�' pry..:;;•%+L:..y+r;•• ✓, S�, •. - - `' :C'•'.,' .`�:.� it,..� �'j �M�' b°'- �xiriJ l'c i •*.g.,..- {•,�, ��•�~• �, , ?Y ;` rte.. _.!. ':'.-,�'t`."•�•,G:`-'• 7 '"..r Z 'Nc2 . c;`' x at •.71-.7'•2%' :'<�'t'1. -i%'. t,s•e.<r.•+'ti`J�,'i `I',.'' 4":,;;:-. LJ 1� +• ,.e,,-....„-` • *y]�yy. .n+.a.. ,} `^,',,A '1F{=rtfia ,•.6Lri 1.N..s+.KrR f;:_ ..:.s•�% F.;'..•r'� ��"4- .,* :r.-� ::::,..4-1N:b: .!.S *0..a• 1t.. .� .t-t,•r"'m. '✓ .".1‘;'.:'. J ' '''•.. ';,•i'. ; rf..--- :k,..,`••, '. . ^ '<;'• �..�c�-�c1a"r�iQ ,? ,:•.:-,'''•0.•' ,' .{rte• -.: ..� T..s�_...i..vT•�. Y:✓,,+..-�: f rrT`�• �•M j y.' a,1 1' :-1C-�'.( '.f���1�':- • .,�,,,..'t/•i���, � f^_.H+.•-w-•t+.��''". `Y�A ,�w, •tr i .1,: --F. :xG v 'G, .7 .=.7i•�S1 !37- �ic,.;<.• X20, t `�, ter_ •• w. ,Z,1�7,(Cl...r Y'� .Ay 1• .T j.i .1js`r% n t � ,v�+,r_ ';'1'-✓•4'�• /�,•l< w;• .mod_r r ' ' ' ,." ' `' ,...r -° :-'L- -. 4 k�r --- Tk^;o h y:;k-$ '-tea+ `'�-�'�-• = y iC. i:u.!V `�y^1ry'..", ds•.�,r�✓.Z' .f„•s'� i+ ' t . y` i- v't''± I � r . tr•��•'y<�-..� `xsCr� �'.r�' : _ .- T �•�'•} t'M.1 4 � �,� •�" .rr':• 4'i,yi ry';•W(• • 4:(%+.-.E �,--;, ��" :_ x.L, C��%. !t-,_- 14 .•r,�y_ " '•?• r •l�bj1a :: -_aN •� ,.• ••: f ti. .'i):• l s_�aye-•.�v..'y�• T i:!..�._C �Fc �`-,'�wiT''a �<' p�y. y�..,��,�(•;-.. •c •(a�C,aC'•itiyy �(`r ,,..;.- "_]I' r Y"k , � - ,1g-•t v- r r'-a,-�y`..t4; .off�l s�[]�( A.T.• - u,° � 'hZ` it+.t,�„':„.4,W.4.}�.,:_ •.r,,;$ 3�.`" > ; 0�' 1�R.,► r1{ - ,.tel:„ ..+. 7: •• ,.f t.yl.•• ., -� .y„ -.h:T•- •.i '•• ,! .'. } •.. -' 40'--... , N�L `,�,.�=c� ,,,a,..,t�•...0 rriiijj,. %: 44 ♦a�.r c- 2 '''4,:,.:' ♦ yt t� ' 4 �N;;:m �.•• 0,�•--� - •F••'t. . `Y , :.,.„.0„, 'G••, .j. --.b -:• -.y:�i� �,1i;,,4, '�,. hr txrt". 1.'" I "•e 4.--, 4,-44;i:. s .t - .f•? !+.1. � „ •�Y -'F,,,,,-,.v,,,,,,.„,,5 ,jt 47:`,l;'`,r ,f Y `•,e.....,4 F,t.'.j-• -.".i,a.ice• >� T`a•' f-` - . f ,.. tJ.:i{ ,• .r l •�1 tLt a......K...7 s ' T,W i'. vi �X '!'• . 4• - -1•,,,71-�•j�CK ,..g, F �� r.1.4• ,7,.`- I. • `.Kn aJ .s"Y:',4-.If, ,,,,,14.. •l ~,#� a+�:Tt`...,.. . -i4p.r',...,.i'� � sya• !r( Ri.' .,t 1„. �, 'r?,;,Y:•W 'l ii";•,'4.I,4 • i L,:1 ..1-... I'd ;�: to J• ':w. .. 1 1 •i ;f, �'.. f� i _ r.°.,.� :1 �., �•:=..=-.�• +r. <••R'' � M,j:t1....» • t� r•.�" i.»' •:.•+c• ti!y�.'+,• -�,.;� 'i.,;�' .. �� _ 4:5x'-••'•-H-• .. •��_ .,-NO::y.`�Z..rw.:. �r�•':1t:4^r..^ r.w C-�T. L�'''. 7:-.--, :.L •�j�::7�._..++► ±�.....� ..r L..o r'i' '°YL, 1 l: r_`-: :4 •.." a✓;•° t,.':: NiK:--"S;,6(..:..- :;:i;--Ccr»Amu et.u.: ca•:aJ::1ont. _•w: Sf=._... i Sw. Wit. I ffitate of 4iinnesota, `'= -r County of.._....,.F.'S.E.N.N.cP..LN.__._..._ ..... so. On thir.. ..._11 Th.................--day .Se;tembar w _, A «- Y-: within and for said County, f 196 _, before n•r, _ hotorY�ub i;__ ._.. _�-',' U pwsanally appeared---.....--_----....---_____.---^ "c�ttr RrYovn vist and »».� •�..y _^._.89. Seim° R. Y49g,uif, his wife , I to me known k Lc the p r n..1.described in and who executed the;or:go:ng i.ns5r'y•runt, and aaicneu•Kd;ed that they executed tie sane as_.-•,•,_the_r -------trde ad a•sd died. !,-;e•:,, ,..�__...._ r.. r: riCTlN'' s_l ••Iir , C :u -ReSY P I 7 . • I �:r�i 1�.��,iz ici, 3'-.;•r.•tl .'F�. �,gi,,.1A7 r•+<r�%•�`'4,-;''• 4.4,,kiai �',1: t4 '"i^.�.,`'Y a',.• 3 �•,. Si,. '>,+ �b ...{,.:lt jMir',a 4?:7,,' .:i7/,:„ t' v3 • q•�... R. a �` .:.:.iii• „N,. r ,.* t4,v.,;;. We .°. �,f.+•t:.4-<�.:, a ;:e7:,r,r. L 1 .,,,t11,;_2'f�� ' u ✓ 'K' fF Q,l C,, � •;f✓-'., "�,,.� .,,•.. is M.�..1�.;{t1t' ,a._rr] � ? '=i �� �.!' .+�•. Fy! 1°-.,•- t if �.;•i: a -•r. F•' srJ,"' m ♦ r••'�i b,. •'i w i.- ..E•••�Itr a ti r �i 7.,t-,•t. '`'z '!'•:S. • ,r.�"'�.JY•iw sj;. � `i••` L{ lw"�+. wF #`A.-�'►q�'.,��S�Fvw~!>i :rcQy.' �`'r..",-;.. �:�1;t�,rF;•,;3'r`is,.°y.��,,:.-s%t,. ✓r•2�r�,•, `t,•.{.,tr.`. F -'`�S;'r.. J, �'z a,�gyp� ifs\:.4'•.1,:,.. %\t1.1,-, .1-4;iy.r ,.v�Fy r,I,A4•.'e�.�•�`[✓• .. w�`. °>� �"y(i'`,a y,c,..„ ,r,...-n. 4 r"` ' •"•i'`f•: .. \ ��t, 'j.Ar.,- �t��3f..,:i4 4 ',••Fe•f •r i W:12,Ir._ /� ...,�'Fi�t�•4v ._1iNK-ri •lC+�`�<.47 •, .i' J 7+ .v'���j,,•C<, .v rt�Si; I - - - - - .•-.. - • - v` rp..:< .. 1.' 602 IAMENDMENT TO MAPLEWOOD COVENANTS 'Y -••_. I WHEREAS, Walter R. Youngquist and Selma R. Youngquist, i, Ihis wife, are the owners in fee simple of Lots One (1) to Eight (8) ., inclusive of Maplewood, County of Carver, State of Minnesota, ac- :t.• Icording to the recorded plat thereof; and WHEREAS, the said owners of said premises have heretofore I 'filed with the Registrar of Titles of Carver County, Minnesota a Doo- .'• ument known as "Maplewood Covenants", which said document has Ibeen filed as Document No. 10833; and °."A, WHEREAS, no part of the premises covered by said covenants M1� Ihas been sold or conveyed and it is the desire and intention of said Walter R. Youngquist and Selma R. Youn;quist to make certain amend- . I ments to said Covenants: ,. i NOW, THEREFORE, said Maplewood Covenants, which have •' I . been filed with the Registrar of Titles of Carver County, Minnesota, z as Document No. 10833, are hereby amended in the following respects: '4: A. Paragraph No. 1 of said Covenants is hereby amended to read as.follows: I 1. All lots in M.apiewood shall be known and described icst as residential lots. No structure shall be erected, altered, placed, or permitted to remain on any lot in said plat other �< than one (1) detached, single-family dwelling not to exceed I two stores in height, together with a private garage of not more than two stalls, which must be attached to the dwell- ing. The minimum ground floor area for a one-story dwell- ' I ing shall be 1120 square feet, and for a two-story dwelling minimum combined floor area of both stories shall be -eiicteen hundred (1E400) square feet, exclusive of garage, breezeways and porches in both types of dwelling. ; . I If 3. That paragraph 6 of said Covenants be completely deleted. IC. The:paragraph 7 of said Covenants be completely deleted. `AJ:J3 Lt.4 Sf j`' �'.,.�%Y``�' It' ....y:; cf'•• tL. '.` %,••7...„:=--4, -.� r. .w'ta ti• *. <.• . •4�1,•S,- 47":14 i, �w ,44'4.S3 4 122. +11..A. . . V.t .!`^ +;' - ,:•. "4e;f"'" .� ,�r.+s•�`1. 'A j j�w;.. try!•.' M't ,. ,a.,y� AUG— E.-00 MON' la : S 1 P . 03 I - •~ f I IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, Walter R. Yourgquist and■Selma R. :;, Youngquist, have hereunto set theiF hands and seals this . 2 day :J� Iof May, 1965. In Presence f ` 3 f.1.4 t us+•r",•,.{ , Wnit R. Yo g4uist .tj 1....",../...40' uist u /elms R noq r I State of Minnesota ) fki- ss. , County of/6 _) On this .27 day of May, 1965, before me, a Notary Public ` within and for said County, personally appeared Walter R. Youngquist Iand Selma R. Youngquist, his wife, to me known to be the persons des- '. cribed in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged ,a y.l, Ithat they executed the same as their free act and deed. ,.r Notary Public (/ lira Puba.1::-r. a c au:d7,1413& in ttnsti:x►Eri pc:.a.1264 1,k7 C** '' . ch. •71-i e -.el• I ePP•G S A:44 'fy'f:'' 1 4 k g r r; J ;" 'S. r Y• •,. . . l ?. . ! Ctiar�r ' • � rr °y t ! . • ,h , r. •t• • Y . i� •• I • ,.......... ■1■■••■......■■■• • r" .. ';.--' •:•'....."."4?•'"?'•A'',..,,,:4.ec....t.:Yeet,,,,/:;,-;:ky;..,,,:,,,,_-,-;-4.-,,,,..7:.).--;•.,.,,_,:i.,:,...%:;,,,i,:„,,,.:,.,,,?-1,6;),..::,17,4,4%,T‘,4-visg.Ar. 4...t.7:1::.,...a-,2_,IT'.z.,,. I ..3 1-' ' .; ,...,.",...m•r.!...• :;5K...*":7).;*:•Svel,,74..4.1.4.,....Mp:ii.l.i''". A- "c te .....Y..k15.::.-a.,` -...!$^.5,-.W.$•fg,...r?....?-$.!:.. ..4.• ...... •• ,..r...-,,. .:, , • ., ..... ,...:7,- . • . .,„ 19k,',O , 1 . • • '"iV,.:7.• ' 77; I '. ' - • . • :.•.:,•..A.: . .• ,•• . , - . • ......,:„.„,, _4.4.1...:':4% .. • •••;,•:■..1..,.4.x, .,.., . :1(4,•iil.Itl:$?P. '1 , • 11....,•1 .01 sa t k I''I SR . ' - 11"‘ ...5 • •A, il 1 y: Li\ .:71 I I ..u. rik 4, r4 I ,,1 • 0* A,a ?MO t ft, I . r ' I 1 ilk . .17:t"9 . A.• t a t 41 de... . . •.41.11.i O4 • • .. . ' '•*:::%•• ' . • g• •:I a\•:tic kg I . ‘1 * • I." ° ■:-. • . ••. • I • I , I '• . I . . . • ., . I " I ...., : . , ., : . . .,...■ . ., ., . .. : - • i , . I . .. • • . . • • . • ! :,••. . . . . . ■ .• ., I •• . . . ' . • • • •P.•1•• "-. •• - 4I•-1,ty.• .. .: .....1'.-: ..:0•:■ •-:.N't ; • ... t••$: "........"- • .. '.i.: .. ?...i.r..t.:..i.A V. . • . . . . . • r . . . . . . . .1 . I I Os• ...,.re- .:1.0 '..•'1 .. .11 — .;'at .. ' .. ..... • , .:, ‘ ..• • .. ' ' . 4. I:c' . • I ' i .... , ! :•••• i • 6 , . .• .. ' . " • .,. . . ... . .0.v..14..44:Ytq..1.4.......--#1...':..,',•t:1 Is.:.•• - . ' . I . • . . • ,, , ' . I ... . . . . . . I )--1.)--') I 4 ir(eq-'- -(, - A/ II ()J-, ,,c_ p. oe- 43,-) I ,‘7- ) i- ' 14. Q , ,,,) ei 010:\! et"' "0:1 (1', November 15, 1973 1,- ! . . / I k ' I II A IChanhassen Village Council i : Administrative Offices 1 Chanhassen, Minnesota Gentlemen: • I Due to the burglaries in the Maplewood Addition of Minnewashta Heights, one approximately a year ago and the most recent one on November 11, 1973, it is I requested by the undersigned residents of the area that the Village of Chanhassen install street lights on Maplewood Circle. IThe policeman investigating the last burglary was L. Capaul, a Deputy of Carver County,and he was in agreement the area was quite dark and subject to Iburglary and vandalism. C(:),/C-2-7 - _Ar-41 4E. - 1111 1 O. S. Mac ONNELL -.. I c 1 IC. H• •GES , 4251 ?� �� 1 G. E. Kruse tiI' '� �8% 3510 Maplewood Circle �o NOV1973 `� Excelsior, Minnesota 1 co RECEIVED ry t_ VILLAGE Op If CHANHASSEN, 1 ,sue MINN. O, 15/tie1 LL O,5c1°‘" I • • ,1\ 1 • • CELHELEBEI VILLAGE I7610 LAREDO DRIVE • P. 0. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 • (612) 474-8885 • II 1 II • , February 26, 1974 ' Mr. G. E. Kruse 3510 Maplewood Circle Excelsior, MN 55331 Dear Mr. Kruse: Several months ago we received correspondence from you requesting street lighting to be furnished to the Maplewood Addition by the City. The Council at that time reviewed your request, but it was denied based on the in- formation contained in the Maplewood Covenant. Consequently, I am sending each of the signers of your letter, a copy of the Maplewood Addition Covenant for inform- ' ational purposes. /(n) /7 Singer your ,/,7 ,,/ r •�=Lly CSchnelle •Cit1Administrator LGS/hh ' Enclosure: Maplewood Addition..Covenant Copies to: O.C. MacConnell C. Hodges 1 t CITYOF 110. CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147• CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager FROM: Jo Ann Olsen, Senior Planner DATE: July 24, 1990 SUBJ: Quarterly Report on Chanhassen Curbside Recycling Program On April 2, 1990, the City initiated a new curbside recycling Y 9 program in which all licensed haulers were required to provide curbside collection of recyclables on the same day as garbage collection to residences in Chanhassen (not including apartments) . As part of the new program, the City delivered one recycling bin to ' each household along with brochures on the new program and how to prepare recyclables. The City had a contract with Waste Management for collection of curbside recyclables city wide in 1989. Today, there are 7 haulers performing curbside recycling in Chanhassen: Aagard West Admiral Waste Chaska Sanitation Mark's Sanitation M.J.A. Sanitation Waste Management Woodlake Sanitary (BFI) ' The haulers are required to provide quarterly reports providing information on tonnages and participation. Attachment #1 provides 1 a summary of the reports. In summary, the participation has greatly increased with some haulers reporting 85% participation (over the previous 25% from last year) . The percentage of participation ranged from 23% to 85% with an average participation of 70%. Since April, the program has recycled 258.63 tons of material which otherwise would have been landfilled. 1 In addition to the report on tonnages and participation, staff requested any comments from the haulers on the current program and expanding it to include plastics. The City received one letter from Gary Lano of Chaska Sanitation. Gary was very positive about 1 I Quarterly Recycling Report July 24, 1990 Page 2 the program in terms of how it was implemented and how well it is working. In speaking with other haulers, it appears that the implementation of the new program went smoothly and all have seen a general increase in participation. The City has received very few complaints from residents and the haulers. The few complaints from the residents were mostly on not receiving recycling bins or being missed on collection or ' recyclables just as the program began. We seldom receive any more calls on missed pick-ups. The one problem we had with the haulers were ensuring all applied the volume base fee so that free market and fair market prices were maintained. This problem has since been resolved. The success of the program can also be shown by the fact that Chaska has already initiated (July, 1990) the same program and Carver County is pursuing all of Carver County cities to provide the same program as ours. The relative ease of the transition to the new program, the increase in participation and the little problems occurring with the program greatly exceeds what I had expected. The City and Recycling Commission should be very proud of the project and it's success. I 1 I i 1 1 1 II IICOLLECTION OF RECYCLING QUARTERLY REPORT IISEVEN HAULERS IIApril, 1990 May, 1990 June, 1990 Total Newspaper 37.78 tons 40.3 tons 38:75 tons 116.83 IIGlass 20. 05 tons 43.22 tons 66.93 tons 130.2 Cans 3 .72 tons 4.09 tons 3.79 ton 11.6 ICardboard 3.74 tons * Yard Waste 260.5 yards ** II * Tonnages provided by Chaska Sanitation, Waste Management and Woodlake (BFI) II ** Tonnages given by Chaska Sanitation, Waste Management, Admiral and Woodlake (BFI) 1 Total Tonnage 258. 63 IIPARTICIPATION TABLE April-June Total Stops Recycling Stops Percentage IIAagard West 2070 1761 85% Admiral 510 384 75% IChaska San. 2292 1900 83% IMJA 840 210 25% Mark's San. 585 351 60% IIWaste Mgmt. 3540 1583 45% Woodlake (BFI) 13,566 10,236 75% I II23,403 16,425 70% II II ISOLID NA= ABATEMENT TONNAGE PROM COLLECTORS FOR THE CITY O!: f.H/ANHASS HAULER: MQ1, P West" I REPORT PERIOD: JJ/_./ 0 TO: __J__ __1 / 'r (MONTHLY REPORTING) IIHOUSEHOLD RECYCLING PARTICIPATION: ' Total number of possible recycling stops this month: 6041D II (e.g. 100 accounts X 4 weeks - 400 possible stops) , Number of actual recycling stops collected this month: � . IParticipation._%: 0(f,96 (-Mv) TONNAGES COLLECTED FOR THIS MONTH: • II ' (weight in tons) • RESIDENTIAL '• COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL Newsprint I'� /01 a /IS , S.15 \ II Class 7 - Cans 410 y " ,Lj- Cardboard • IIHigh Grade Paper GREEN GLASS n I° T BROWN GLASS _9 m c I D ` . • Other PLASTIC • • TOTALS 9a I (we) certify that the above stated figures are an accurate account and that the reported information will not be used for abatement • totals or reimbursements from any other. City or recycling program. • The following is a listing of local markets for recyclable materials: 71,Paper.,:. 15Er ' 1 Y'C) tC' 2F,k4 N,401—L) : ur :Glass• ft-S• RECEIVED Date: 717--9.0 JUL 181990 I . CITY OF CHANHASSEN ISOLID WASTE ABATEMENT TONNAGE FROM COLLECTORS • 1 POR THE CITY OF: rHANHASSEN HAULER: AA A/f p ti(�e.S 1 IREPORT PERIOD: �__/ 9 O To: ���0 (MONTHLY REPORTING) IIHOUSEHOLD RECYCLING PARTICIPATION: Total number of possible recycling stops this month: I (e.g. 100 accounts X 4 weeks • 400 possible stops) , Dumber of actual recycling stops collected this month: _ IParticipation %: TONNAGES COLLECTED FOR THIS MONTH: • • I . (weight in tons) RESIDENTIAL • - COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL Newsprint l/J Q. S 1 Class a ?7 3 a Cans y9 i_ III Cardboard - ' High Grade Paper GREEN GLASS 3 S 3 .`� 1 i - BROWN GLASS pia S Other PLASTIC "y TOTALS /3 d' I eve) certify that the above stated figures are an accurate account and that the reported information will not be used for abatement • 1 totals or reimbursements from any other. City or recycling program. IThe following is a listing of local markets for recyclable materials: Paper. • Class: • ' • I Cans: Signature: re? I Date: 7 )7 ?o • I . SOLID HASTE ABATEMENT TONNAGE FROM COLLECTORS IFOR THE CITY OP: CHANHASSFN HAULER: M '4''P Jest IREPORT PERIOD: .2_//i_i_iS• TO: _Li:LA1 Q . (MONTHLY REPORTING) IHOUSEHOLD RECYCLING PARTICIPATION: • Total number of possible recycling stops this month: II (e.g. 100 accounts X 4 weeks as 400 possible stops) , )tumber of actual recycling stops collected this month: IParticipation. 1: ___ TONNAGES COLLECTED FOR THIS MONTH: • I (weight in tons) • RESIDENTIAL .• COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL Newsprint e?‘ I. if IGlass 4 .5 • Cans . 2..._ Cardboard . - ' IISigh Grade Paper • GREEN GLASS / 1.. Z BROWN GLASS • f Other PLASTIC I "MIS .....Y.E.e.t.41.4....919'i . vimmasessameasameat I (we) certify that the above stated figures are an accurate account Iand that the reported information will not be used for abatement totals or reimbursements from any other. City or recycling program. • IIThe following is a listing of local markets for recyclable materials: . Paperl. Icas:Class: signature: S • I Date: 7-i7q0 - v� `► I (qG ISOLID WASTE.ABATEMENT TONNAGE FROM COLLECTORS k>(4 FOR THE CITY OF: CHANHASSEN I '� (��G Cc�v�-�r C- t-■v e cr-;-� ■5) fr min s'5 ' 7 IREPORT PERIOD: ( /qQ 4 (MONTHLY REPORTING) IIHOUSEHOLD RECYCLING PARTICIPATION: Total number of possible recycling stops this month: QC) I (e.g. 100 accounts X 4 weeks = 400 possible stops) umber of actual recycling stops collected this month: I II Participation %: r pp _� � Q TONNAGES COLLECTED FOR THIS MONTH: — 0.� 1e--C_ � ""� (weight in tons) RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL 1 a9f, \ :Au. n� Newsprint . (S'q? 8--fr, P, .z.'--n c3- t IGlass 0 .i 3q -n') ,[Gu !_ i ,Di Dc hr\vA'h • 13115 Tr\ , i i-tci 0 -Ty) r i 15- T- Cans TA 0 . bc >Tt'1 = 0 5!b`Tt1 . 155D 'TIM ' Cardboard �(_7 IHigh Grade Paper Pa_90'C y,v ( (Ck.F24 CL) ( i -(-- Yard Waste 3,a f3 L1. 195 yi5 - j,() ,yd II a, Municipal l�-� Solid Waste pic&% '15 syarcLS v(10. Other TOTALS II ...N... - _ . _ .._,..1 as=s.===.sass I (we) certify that the above stated figures are an accurate account I and that the reported information will not be used for abatement totals or reimbursements from any other City or recycling program. The following is a listing of local markets for recyclable materials: I Paper:Wo..S4 Glass: O.,v„../6n0\ - i Cans: 4... Signature: ,U4 —'f27 Date: 7/6 ZIT) 111 SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT TONNAGE FROM COLLECTORS FOR THE CITY OF: CHANHASSEN HAULER: CrASKA SA:1'ATTI0 ' REPORT PERIOD: 90 TO: —L1-2219° (MONTHLY REPORTING) ' HOUSEHOLD RECYCLING PARTICIPATION: Total number of possible recycling stops this month: 2,292 ' (e.g. 100 accounts X 4 weeks • 400 possible stops) Number of actual recycling stops collected this month: 1,900 estimated ' Participation %: 90° (53 qd;) TONNAGES COLLECTED FOR THIS MONTH: (weight in tons) RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL Newsprint 26.1,17 IGlass 9.54 ' Cans 1 .15 . - Cardboard 2.10 High Grade Paper 0 Yard Waste 30.00 IIMixed Municipal Solid Waste 360 tons 40 tons 60 tons Other TOTALS ' 432 3 40 I (we) certify that the above stated figures are an accurate account 11 and that the reported information will not be used for abatement totals or reimbursements from any other City or recycling program. The following is a listing of local markets for recyclable materials: IPaper: t'aldorf Corp. — Gnade Recycling — Maple Creamery Glass: Anchor Glass ICans: BPA Recycling Signature: a,,,k RECEIVED IDate: 1 1i�.I 90 _ JUL 181990 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Chaska Sanitation GARY LANO -TEL. 448-2547 731 VICTORIA DRIVE CHASKA, MINNESOTA To: City of Chanhassen From: Chaska Sanitation ' 7;ate: July 1: , 1990 to :11 Interested Par ties T please f. 1 f. t , ?�_ccS� find my comments on our first 3 months of service as ' a recycle collector. '•e have been totally amazed with the participation from our customers. ''e have received many compliments for offering, this ' service and the customers seem to be very happy. At this time I would like to mark You for the professional manner in which you set the standards and r_.7ulations for us as the hauler and sincerely appreciate not forcing arc of the esisting haulers out of your city. This means clot, especially to us as one of the smaller haulers in the area. t:e have serviced the surrounding communities for over 36 years, family owned and operated and hope to continue for many more. Thank You. Ly response to adding plastics Ion the collection is uncertain at this time. Then people hear the word plastics, that is a very open subject, thinking any form of plastic is acceptable ,,-hick it is not. Plastics require clot of space, both for ,trucks collecting, and storage of the materials after being collected. If ' your decision is to add plastics on as one of the materials collected, we ;rill just have to adjust to it. Thank You. Sincerely, ` -, \c ' Gary Lano Chaska Sanitation 1 I Chaska Sanitation GARY LANO -TEL. 448-2547 731 VICTORIA DRIVE CHASKA, MINNESOTA March 20, 1990 ' Dear Valued Customer, This letter is to inform you that as of April 2, 1990, the City ' of Chanhassen has passed an ordinance in which every licensed garbage hauler has to offer a recycling curbside collection. In the past, the city had contracted with one recycling company to collect all ' recycables from the entire city at no expense to you the residents. In the cities findings, this program was getting too expensive for funding this project, which came out of the cities general funds. Therefore, they have mandated that every solid waste collector offer ' such a program and charge each customer accordingly. Since you will be paying for recycling collection through the ' new rates, please utilize them. In a joint effort for we the hauler, and you the customer, we can help reduce the amount of trash collected that is now being landfilled. Us at Chaska Sanitation strongly en— courage you to at least try to recycle and keep our environment a cleaner and healthier place to live. 1-,ith this new program starting for both you and us, we will be offering two levels of service. L1V71 1: $13.00 per month for those of you who will be participating in our recycling program. (Strongly recommended). This includes regular weekly garbage collection (2 — 30 gallon cans or less a week) and a total seperate collection for recycable materials on the same day but different time intervals. Materials required to recycle: Please follow instructions. ' 1. Newspaper 2. Glass 3. Cans ' 4. Corrugated Cardboard The City of Chanhassen will be delivering your recycable con- tainer on March 24th. All residents of Chanhassen will be receiving one. 1 Chaska Sanitation GARY LANO - TEL.448-2547 ' 731 VICTORIA DRIVE CHASKA, MINNESOTA LEVEL 2: $14.50 per month for those of you valued customers who wish not to recycle or simply do not have the time to seperate your materials. ''e feel offering two different levels of service will encourage most of you to recycle. Both levels 1 & 2 include yard waste debris at no extra charge. This covers 3 bags of grass or leaves weekly. Any amount over 3 bags will be an extra charge of 500 ' per bag. Please make sure these bags do not exceed 40 lbs. As for the increase, in the past we were allowed to collect all these items at the same time, but now with all the new laws and regulations coming into effect, this isn't possible. Basically, you as the customer were receiving 3 services for the price of 1 in the past. ' Now it is 3 seperate services. The information we need from you for our records is? Level 1 — ' Yes I want to be involved in your recycling program. Please let us know by phone or mail that you will be participating, putting your ' rate at $13.00 per month. Anyone who doesn't contact our office will automatically be put in Level 2, which is $14.50 per month. ' Please notify us by April 15th or sooner if your choice is Level 1. If there are any problems or questions of any kind, please feel free to give us a call. At this time we would like to Thank You for ' your support as we will continue to do our absolute best in servicing you ' Sincerely, Gary Lano, Owner Chaska Sanitation (448-2547) I Ia Chaska Sanitation GARY LANO- TEL. 448-2547 731 VICTORIA DRIVE CHASKA, MINNESOTA I ' INSTRUCTIONS FCR RECYCABLE MATERIALS: ' NElt'SPAPTR: Bag or bundle with string, and set it in, under, or alongside the recycling container. Please, ONLY newspaper and newspaper inserts can be accepted. Shiny paper, magazines, junk mail and other paper products are not accepted. GLASS: Rinse glass clean, and place in a paper grocery bag inside the recycling container. Clear, green, and brown glass are ' accepted — no need to remove caps or labels or sort by color. Please, no window or plate glass, kitchenware, or light bulbs. CANS: Rinse food cans clean, and place in a paper grocery bag inside the recycling container. Any metal cans and clean aluminum ' foil are accepted. No need to remove labels. Please, no other scrap metals. CORRUGATED CARDBOARD: Flatten corrugated boxes. Tie in bundles dies no larger than 3 feet by 3 feet, and place in, under or along- ' side the recycling container. Please, no gray or white boxboard (such as cereal or cracker boxes), wax—or plastic—coated card- board, pizza boxes, milk cartons, etc. I I I I . I I I - - -- - C.7 1r -- - - 7-:- t--' ---1.' ':-4 .---' --/'.--: '.. - :74. '.). —.)--.--) ..--1-:-.4.;./. am)'--../ -'-) • 0 'D C (.1, a ID (C. - • . , L L. L. 1_ r_ '71,4111,421 - 1 • C 11 t '.• 0 • 0 0 (i- •:.-- fia • Z ..:%.z 2:--- -: 1 . ,_. ."2, ii - 0.- % • ;: ‘:'--'. -:--;-.:----- '. - / " I Chaska Sanitation ( C II ' .. 4 II, ;..-. r:1 -' .- -.. - .: ,• 4 Z.7. 410 11. .i...: •.--: • --' ; . e .-:-•.., • 1 RECYCLING INFORMATION I We appreciate your participation to make our Recycling Program successful! Please read the following instructions: I What's Collected Newspaper Glass Bottles and Jars I Food and Beverage Aluminum/Tin Cans Cardboard bundled no larger than 3'x3' Preparation of Recyclables I Newspaper -Remove glossy inserts -Place in paper bag, reusable container, or tied I with string ' Food and Beverage Cans -Rinse clean I -Please separate aluminum & tin in brown bags Glass Bottles and Jars ' -Rinse clean I . ' No broken glass - to prevent injuries. __ Any questions or information call 448-2547. tc ap .-•-, S.....• (..; ..... ....„ ,....., .,..., ,..... g..., .... AN% ■.: .7-ci -1111 0 (1 =, 3 II G-; . • •- . •- : • _., ' ) C-1 THANK YOU ( CS "--- II • Ir't - : : . - : . :'.. - ) 4 I . a c (% f. G 1--- "ii,: 0 VS F-,-. -,v .-..! •.. - - :- :':;' : :1 !::-.... a III ..:... i;.-‘ :"-•# :--:.- . s --; •st C"111■111,112111131/1c7I-guir-"%j•■11.1Y-,.......7-■1/ -. -- -. 4 --) ) A -' » ) ) • ( C • — 0 (r • 21, 411 • It" ' : : --1 .3 -.:14 Al -) ) ) I I I SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT TONNAGE FROM COLLECTORS FOR THE CITY OF: CHANHASSEN ' HAULER: 474' 'f ,-A/U /r- 7"-, 0 4/ , rfc REPORT PERIOD: j__./././ 7 G TO: ' .T Z/—/--/�d ' (MONTHLY REPORTING) HOUSEHOLD RECYCLING PARTICIPATION: ' Total number of possible recycling stops this month: /1 0 (e.g. 100 accounts X 4 weeks IN 400 possible stops) ' Number of actual recycling stops collected this month: / i Participation %: d 1 TONNAGES COLLECTED FOR THIS MONTH: (weight in tons) 6 ' RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL Newsprint y IGlass Cans ICardboard High Grade Paper IYard Waste ' • Mixed Municipal Solid Waste Other I TOTALS sse=s=xstss:rs=- - - ---- - -- - - - sasrx s.�= ==aa===scats II (we) certify that the above stated figures are an accurate account and that the reported information will not be used for abatement ' totals or reimbursements from any other City or recycling program. The following is a listing of local markets for recyclable materials: I Paper: r✓A< o" Glass: "4,4HaF Cans: 6-fen ,- w tk e' ' Signature: � / � /� ?/ RECEIVED Date: .7--/ e ` y JUL 181990 CITY OF CHANHASSEN IISOLID WASTE ABATEMENT TONNAGE FROM COLLECTORS FOR THE CITY OF: CHANHASSEN ' HAULER: /L7A/,',(- "S -C4 N.to f' v iv .1 N e REPORT PERIOD: 11/_ y G TO: "(:j-2j-L4 REPORTING) 1 HOUSEHOLD RECYCLING PARTICIPATION: ' Total number of possible recycling stops this month: (e.g. 100 accounts X 4 weeks - 400 possible stops) Humber of actual recycling stops collected this month: / -r _/ Participation t: G O TONNAGES COLLECTED FOR THIS MONTH: f (weight in tons) /elk/ RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL 1 Newsprint 3 1 Glass Cans ICardboard IHigh Grade Paper Yard Waste I Mixed Municipal Solid Waste Other TOTALS tser.-=sassma s-- ra=rrasss _tea =a=w I (we) certify that the above stated figures are an accurate account and that the reported information will not be used for abatement totals or reimbursements from any other City or recycling program. The following is a listing of local markets for recyclable materials: IPaper: wAi-noe,/- Glass: AvG/.:c% ' Cans: eleg-g /e,rf✓ Signature: " Z IDate: 7-! t- 9 ° I IISOLID WASTE ABATEMENT TONNAGE FROM COLLECTORS FOR THE CITY OF: CHANHASSEN HAULER: K .f Sh?N /tip f/ 0 A/ .1- A/ C • ' REPORT PERIOD: 1 jji p TO: (MONTHLY REPORTING) HOUSEHOLD RECYCLING PARTICIPATION: Total number of possible recycling stops this month: /417C (e.g. 100 accounts X 4 weeks = 400 possible stops) ' Number of actual recycling stops collected this month: /!'' Participation %: 1(6) TONNAGES COLLECTED FOR THIS MONTH: (weight in tons) I RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL Newsprint 1 Glass j Cans /0 ' Cardboard I High Grade Paper Yard Waste I Mixed Municipal • Solid Waste IOther TOTALS Z (ve) certify that the above stated figures are an accurate account and that the reported information will not be used for abatement Itotals or reimbursements from any other City or recycling program. The following is a listing of local markets for recyclable materials: IPaper: WALvo2,e - Glass: /.v crhy i2 Cans: C4ai¢ f wKr I t�?� Signature:' IDate: 7- '6 - 9' o IISOLID WASTE ABATEMENT TONNAGE FROM COLLECTORS FOR THE CITY OF: CHANHASSEN ) II HAULER: 111( \k < i7A7/ bA REPORT PERIOD: ._C___/_1__1 gib TO: ��9C� II (MONTHLY REPORTING) HOUSEHOLD RECYCLING PARTICIPATION: ITotal number of possible recycling stops this month: gg7"6 (e.g. 100 accounts X 4 weeks In 400 possible stops) /� /'� I . Number of actual recycling stops collected this month: ` V Participation %: 4 0 ITONNAGES COLLECTED FOR THIS MONTH: (weight in tons) I RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL INewsprint IGlass r Cans • 1/ . • ICardboard -'—— High Grade Paper IYard Waste 30 oS' II Y Mixed Municipal Solid Waste 1 6, _ IOther 1 '1'V 1'AL� � - - ass=ass:s II (we) certify that the above stated figures are an accurate account and that the reported information will not be used for abatement Itotals or reimbursements from any other City or recycling program. The following is a listing of local markets for recyclable materials: IIPaper: Glass: Cans: Signature: RECEIVED 2 Date: t'd JUL 2 01990 CITY OF CHANHASSEN I SOLID WASTE ABA' LENT TONNAGE FROM COLLECTO± " ' FOR THE CITY OF: 6,-e/X-1-€1--4-ti- REPORTED BFI RECYCLING SYSTEMS OF MN, INC. MAY 7 REPORT PERIOD: OS// 0// 90 TO: 05//.34/ 510 , ® �5�� (MONTHLY REPORTING) cif OF CHANHASSF.N HOUSEHOLD RECYCLING PARTICIPATION: ' Total number of possible recycling stops this month: 7 7lD G (e.g. 100 accounts X 4 weeks = 400 possible stops) Number of actual recycling stops collected this month: 4 ,511r/ ' Participation %: N//p ' TONNAGES COLLECTED FOR THIS MONTH: (weight in tons) ICOMMERCIAL DROP RESIDENTIAL MULTI-DWELLING OFF ,Newsprint c2/ i6/ Glass 57 97 'Cans / 46/ Cardboard •ag I High Grade Paper IYard Waste p V Mixed Municipal IlSolid Waste J&3 5 Other ITOTALS s I (we) certify that the above stated figures are an accurate account and that the reported information will not be used for abatement totals or reimbursements from any other City or recycling program. IThe following is a listing of local markets for recyclable materials: Paper: Waldorf IGlass: Anchor Cans: American Iron, Broo yn Park Alum. , Recycle Minnesota Resource Signature: Date:Y l j /999 SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT TONNAGE FROM COLLECTORS IFOR THE CITY OF: • REPORTED B BFI RECYCLING YSTEMS OF MN, INC. REPORT PERIOD: Q_570/ /9.11_ TO: ds/3/ / �jl� (MONTHLY REPORTING) HOUSEHOLD RECYCLING PARTICIPATION: /`� ' Total number of possible recycling stops this month: "7°3/_` 7 (e.g. 100 accounts X 4 weeks = 400 possible stops) Number of actual recycling stops collected this month: 3, 7q7 Participation %: S77 710 TONNAGES COLLECTED FOR THIS MONTH: (weight in tons) COMMERCIAL DROP RESIDENTIAL MULTI-DWELLING OFF INewsprint /, 4/7 Glass Jt 57 Cans r /, V3 ICardboard , High Grade Paper 1 Yard Waste F./re/to.) Mixed Municipal 'Solid Waste l/60,/62-' Other 'TOTALS III (we) certify that the above stated figures are an accurate account and that the reported information will not be used for abatement totals or reimbursements from any other City or recycling program. I The following is a listing of local markets for recyclable materials: I Paper: Waldorf lass: Anchor Cans: American Iron, Brooklyn Park Alum. , Recycle Minnesota Resource Is i gnature: Date:1/477)7a', 31, 9c JUN 11i CITY OF CHANHASSEN SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT TONNAGE FROM COLLECTORS FOR THE CITY OF: (I d JUL 0 8 1990 REPORTED B BFI RECYCLING SYSTEMS OF MN, INC. Cili CF CHANHASSEN REPORT PERIOD: / /I ) TO: ' (MONTHLY REPORTING) HOUSEHOLD RECYCLING PARTICIPATION: Total number of possible recycling stops this month: 05I1" (e.g. 100 accounts X 4 weeks = 400 possible stops) Number of actual recycling stops collected this month: Participation %: 4^57;41 ' TONNAGES COLLECTED FOR THIS MONTH: (weight in tons) I COMMERCIAL DROP RESIDENTIAL MULTI-DWELLING OFF INewsprint /7; 39 Glass 4 VI 65-- ICans /, /7i ICardboard High Grade Paper IYard Waste C.��d�• %' (3?,F6, 7Ox),5 ? ,dc, , c� Mixed Municipal ISolid Waste /CAS, /0 Other ITOTALS II (we) certify that the above stated figures are an accurate account and that the reported information will not be used for abatement totals or reimbursements from any other City or recycling program. 1 The following is a listing of local markets for recyclable materials: IPaper: Waldorf Glass: Anchor Cans: Americ Iron, Brookl n •- k Alum. , Recycle Minnesota Resource � Signature: � -�� Date: 94-01„,e_ Waste Management-Savage 12448 Pennsylvania Avenue South Savage, Minnesota 55378 A Waste Management Company ' 612/890-1100 • FAX: 612/890-5143 ‘4!!!:" Date 7/16/90 ' To: Jo Ann Olson From: Steve Christen Re: Quarterly Report • ' Jo Ann: Enclosed you will find the paperwork for the quarterly report that you requested. If you have any questions please call me at 890-1100. ■ Steve C 1 1 RECEIVED • JUL 171990 CITY OF CHANHASSEN a division of Waste Management of Minnesota,•Inc IISOLID WASTE ABATEMENT TONNAGE FROM COLLECTORS FOR THE CITY OF: CHANHASSEN IHAULER: L t„, - - ” t)4` c REPORT PERIOD: _LLLI GO TO: �! �O (MONTHLY REPORTING) HOUSEHOLD RECYCLING PARTICIPATION: ITotal number of possible recycling stops this month: //V) (e.g. 100 accounts X 4 weeks = 400 possible stops) I . Number of actual recycling stops collected this month: 65-2 Participation %: in% ITONNAGES COLLECTED FOR THIS MONTH: (weight in 'tons) RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL Newsprint S S.%C IGlass ,;, t 'RS Cans . ;.5 ICardboard , ©8 High Grade Paper IYard Waste IMixed Municipal Solid Waste _ IOther TOTALS Ll.9 q - - - ___ ' I (we) certify that the above stated figures are an accurate account and that the reported information will not be used for abatement IItotals or reimbursements from any other City or recycling program. The following is a listing of local markets for recyclable materials: IPaper: j i d orc Glass: Aeic,1+61` Cans: ►le-:c.,0", ,1_r'ov1 Signature: L/1 I Date: 7/16(90 90 - I SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT TONNAGE FROM COLLECTORS FOR THE CITY OF: CHANHASSEN ' HAULER: (Ala S T t �a# �e se ek, da f REPORT PERIOD: TO: j 30 (MONTHLY REPORTING) ' HOUSEHOLD RECYCLING PARTICIPATION: Total number of possible recycling stops this month: ltgt' (e.g. 100 accounts X 4 weeks = 400 possible stops) - Number of actual recycling stops collected this month: .G7 Participation %: �3 2 ' TONNAGES COLLECTED FOR : THIS MONTH. (weight in tons) RESIDENTIAL • COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL Newsprint 3, i 3 print Glass , 7g Cans . ?-R I Cardboard , p ei IHigh Grade Paper Yard Waste IMixed Municipal Solid Waste IOther TOTALS I (we) certify that the above stated figures are an accurate account and that the reported information will not be used for abatement Itotals or reimbursements from any other City or recycling program. The following is a listing of local markets for recyclable materials: IPaper: jJa (d c Glass: A,-C 4 ov- ' Cans: ,g m p�rcaN // signature: A P 6, Date: `7 14. cv ' SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT TONNAGE FROM COLLECTORS ' FOR THE CITY OF: CHANHASSEN HAULER: q v s A4 ` th J REPORT PERIOD: J� TO: ��`�j0 (MONTHLY REPORTING) ' HOUSEHOLD RECYCLING PARTICIPATION: Total number of possible recycling stops this month: //90 ' (e.g. 100 accounts X 4 weeks = 400 possible stops) - Number of actual recycling stops collected this month: 519 Participation %: y3ga TONNAGES COLLECTED FOR THIS MONTH: (weight in tons) RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL 1 Newsprint i-J, Yo Glass . 99 Cans ag ' Cardboard • 13 IIHigh Grade Paper Yard Waste 1 Mixed Municipal Solid Waste IOther TOTALS ?o � - - --- - . - - - - - - - 1 IESISELIMICIIMMI=1 I (we) certify that the above stated figures are an accurate account and that the reported information will not be used for abatement totals or reimbursements from any other City or recycling program. The following is a listing of local markets for recyclable materials: • Paper: Glass: ' Cans: Signature: • Date: -7//6/9/ I 1 _ . CITY CJ F 1 1,1/ , CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE• P.O. BOX 147• CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-19000 FAX (612) 937-5739 1 1 May 25, 1990 Mr. John Sunman Aagard West 1 124 Union Street Norwood, MN 55368 1 Dear John: The Chanhassen City Code requires licensed haulers in Chanhassen to offer a volume base fee to their customers. It is my understanding that Aagard West will be again providing a 60 gallon fee in addition to the current 90 gallon fee. This letter is to confirm that Aagard West will immediately begin offering the 60 gallon fee 1 again to its customers so that you will be in conformance of the City Code. The City of Chanhassen is very proud of the percentage of 1 participation in recycling that Aagard West is receiving from its customers. Whenever we drive through the City we almost always see a recycling bin next to your container. Your program to have customers commit to recycle is obviously very successful. Should you ever have questions or comments, please feel free to 1 call me. Sincerely, 1 Jo Ann Olsen 1 Senior Planner JO:v 1 cc: Recycling Commission City Council 1 1 1 II • LIST OF LICENSED HAULERS FEE BASE CHASKA 1 price for up to two 30 gallon cans if you recycle. 1 price for three 30 gallon cans if you do not recycle. HAUGENS 1 price 30 gallon (yard waste not included) 1 price unlimited (yard waste included) ' WASTE MANAGEMENT 1 price 90 gallon (yard waste included) 1 price 60 gallon (yard waste $1.50/bag) WOODLAKE 1 price full service (yard waste included) ' 1 price for two 30 gallon cans (yard waste not included) 1 price for one 30 gallon can (yard waste not included) ' ADMIRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT 1 price for one 30 gallon can ($1.50 per extra 30 gallon can) ' 1 price for one 90 gallon can (yard waste $.50 per bag) 1 • CITY 0 F HANHASSENi 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147• CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 * FAX (612) 937-5739 ' July 23 , 1990 ' Mr. Henry Griner Lakeview Hills Apartment Management 8800 Lake Riley Boulevard ' Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Mr. Griner: ' Enclosed please find two recycling brochures which P rovide information on how to prepare recyclables and on the Chanhassen ' Program. This information should help with educating your residents on The City greatly appreciates Lakeview Hills Management providing recycling services to your residents. We have received calls from residents of Lakeview Hills Apartments wishing to recycle and I am sure they will be very pleased that they too can now recycle. ' Please keep me in touch with how the program is working and if the City can be of further help. ' Sincerely, 'd C Jo Ann Olsen Senior Planner ' JO:v ' cc: City Council Recycling Commission 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN <r 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 July 9, 1990 1 Mr. Clement Springer 1 Weis Asset Management, Inc. 3601 Minnesota Drive, Suite 110 Minneapolis, MN 55435 ' Dear Mr. Springer: On July 9, 1990, Fire Marshal Mark Littfin and I inspected the Brook's site to determine if a dumpster for recycled corrugated cardboard could be located adjacent to the shopping center. Since the dumpster will contain flammable materials, the Fire Code 1 requires at least a 5 ft. separation from the building. There is not adequate room for a dumpster to be 5 ft. away from the back wall and not have it interfere with the driving lane. ' Currently there are three dumpsters located next to the fence. Since corrugated cardboard appears to take up a lot of space in the three existing dumpsters, we would suggest that one of the dumpsters be used solely for corrugated cardboard. Smaller 90 gallon containers used for recycled glass and cans can be located next to the building. We greatly appreciate your taking the time and effort to provide recycling opportunities to your tenants at Town Square. Please let me know what you decide to do and if I can be of any further help. ' Sincerely, Jo Ann Olsen Senior Planner JO:k cc: Administrative Section, City Council Packet, July 23, 1990 Mark Littfin, Fire Marshal 1 1 I _ Vol. .�__. 3, Issue 43 Thursday, August 2, 1990 _ • IP.O. Box 99, Chanhassen, MN 55317 '' 4,11/41444ii-o/Ping '-,_ •- ----: ill ., The Chanhassen. a . e 1.0......... 1 . .•.. . 1, .. •. • . Recycling records high 'participation -- ' coming o A ' Plastics may be g next on priority . ' Pioneer's trek to Ct t y} retraced in volume•David?edema ; �. a ' to. ar f-- i - - (Editor's mole:Theodore an Ile Chinas= d Ms Maimed from a ,r�r 4 `; e Sophie(Bonjour)Boat were 25 p pr ° •, c • the first eettlees in ____ Fat sorrier a new tecyclia8 boa T ,� The story of their fives Y print ved 1n fast three months d the �-�rat- ..•-v. i' - e"` '�9_ - : deals letters that is wrote m their I - .• Europe,wild taw own waste haulers.have 2 ,,,, x been translated and emptied into csthata the �-, rte.. . - _ a t�,«r • wls Frostier Family is, newspaper•loss,and metal out '' s -c y - - ; Sophie Boat.1g51.1f�2a."Marvel' on the curb to be picked up.And the a. 3. - , „.. '•% +tY is reporting very few complaints. ,"'' -7,-",','•-•81p , - .. tlfde of ham.Press).Mk iii I la°e in wpye�t required program in ' 3 °` :,•- ° - loot the two featorss that tetra , stmdeotiai hauler to Defer recycling a -E' i appear is•e:t week's edifice of ' o' whether they it the /arvias, Y provided .�,. •� � �'•�t":;._ ;�,.,� _, atwspapc.L siuhserJsst caeca, aft selves or wattaaed with co- .a�.,s.3r-,e;s : s some of their letters will be pub 1.-. other oomp ray to do it.The curbside ...._.,.i.:; had to ocntr on the semc der - . '" = F .she • listed verbatim) �a the mgstlar wedtly trash pick-up. a - , B FJiraieti�Yilte (Prior a that,the city mouaaed ,F > a_i •.,.,' a,.: 'In 1851•whey he wee 17,Theo- a year one,company to t x: - , R coat Boat,the antic youngest d 2etmyy and Anti Boat's 11 doikken, Wiith the n w program,the thy : . ; ¢ .. i bid in ewell to be family and home provided the items and see -`" Y '+ g .�" ` Y j in Switzerland aid set out to seek his d Mao S m t;./j� forum 30 America.The adventure Fair cut on the curb. After these months, the seven '`. -:....--e•_•7_'":.,,::., - LJ J°uY�B them Goan tin the; that currently pick up "a -." y '' After a stormy six-week Maria Wes in the city have reported i -...:'a - - \ -- -- io which he suffered from 1 ar[tnpatton a a great t and ado fit' d'' .41,-__:_,.:. r• - acs and dyawtery, he arrived in his pine I low as 25 70 peraot average Garbage haulms la Chanhassen are reporting as average 70 pt:rtmt partcipatioa is carbaide mow'Yore mo be gin his waodaiags ill W mti Axountiog for the differmas pisoto) �7 theme Wad began journey by hating gan Mt each hauler may be the amount m a farm in New Jersey with a fain- peals to cremation a incentives that the program on the same day as garbage Chaim Ins begun the Name pro- 'Ws,but there is a acorn,main- .By with whom his father lad made He I. offered,according to 2oAm hem pprobably has contributed to in that city,and C aver County .oily mwg haulers,about the*wk. +nngemeats.After working m the Static April,plantar.tom of material She said that heP+ng tale all dtia will pursue suer first aid variety rut pnd- firm for a env minutes he owed ro Vermon very few aampions rho same osurae. tacit. Canada to begin teaching French at a for One been onOmed that atherwive might had been received from either rest- The comity is taking on special , Mike Baimpec,general manager Swim-operated Baptist nomian and been]mdfitled.Glass(130 tom)) dents or haulers.Most of the arty collection micas, including this -for Waste Manegemeat,a local bailer agricultural settlement 30 mils south newspaper(117 tom)aocaunted complains were about not receiving Saturday's free collecuoi of mph- that is participating in plastic Ma- te majority of recyclable',with bins or being missed on the pica-up awes,*tab are no linger aompad up program in the Oda of Min- ' cans accounting for 12 tons. day.The city will begin delivering a at landfills.The two collectice ales toolo Plymouth am Ooldea v Olsen aid that the participanon trued recycling bin to maiden= latitude the mouth parking lot of the said that.n fc the plastic recycling -H has h i g h I i e �Pfe$°mis�g�y chicSturday, yofthe Metro_'areaOamrye rthaaelet a mtbeenviell,eoeived,,edaawisto v_:. ` }men sou a Grant from tae Met- Ome bwl r,Dory—Lino—of-t1attta of Wa000ia a Gbtsay Read l0). Ae n rng ll tiopoli to in a knerw the �d>be need Cyr c� , e in ychan girl's -ch•i, flag bins,h estimated that prtici- -oft that his was suer e� +t- -r" milk hat pruduas— ,• I three 'totally Company wuervw•,a bob water hates,dmh- -aura a•am7k and caner jugs,soda - _ T �� hs nearly double in three rim of theme with the pwdps- waders air wodieooa:��' books,nod iaettry prodata®sin ..S io Rob3 n _..� von— ripkd customers,whim was 83 ass and freezers any be duo tees—ere able!4 be miWiett,but -! t. we're percent over three maths. as longs;emote(aunty rests pec p an the thou items ws 8 ytss •;p; time we're ea�mmethin Kiss. "We have received many nom- d provided, uupp the mgait d tins -. l0.bee a H ice.the Aliments fa offering chic cervix, The men pra��that Chamds ly are being uee 1s �$ha ;;•- are in the news,"Olsen said. and the asstomers setae to be very seo may esidarake before 1990 1 91st educate perms is a laeg gta rife.: d St . I realise they need to do "Lam acid,adding his thanks taw is the curbside pick-up of pls- -�," he said. 'Sint these plena !!he thohmea 17-, _ }' -She said the raven to the city for not facing the amW tic Olsen maid the these is mmttog _products be ups lot dictum,and oyd hswortea m ;,;s_ ..7� ; foto of the bins,and having the haulm out of twines.. ;.,'' � as be areal mortal for recycled pis- ale key is volume reduoioo." - �y°er rain - ..... `,, _ 11• ..vp Y�- •m' ° Repo u r es more '' a . awing,creative arts _ •p g o e Park & Ride lots : . arts three sites y e - scats.The ` ,-`-:- jam. developed in Chan - r'i-a,"�'i-i.J 4.....n::�;,e: 'ai ear;.:,* ;i=f•: . , l � _.- .'_.V was the showing and rv.. .t,.T ',.,s ;,";r.,'$if+ri;rata•; . ,f 0r et the pejea By David Pbdeesea • S'"a' 1;.bw tie.."4....•••:'3m,,w- ' s r n the wua ..p F _ „ -" . '. : a tat. , . highways Mould bye the movement t..-v` 1 r-r_ ",�rY pi's .J,J',. .4 v--1 "i s-H eat Heeds for t'"' of peoph not vehicles." r, ^'.-_,. T,r see' n tat io-t+, :• ' - i Had lean Haidt std "`sus r So begin a nerdy by the South a -1",t rw• aa(�S, i�__"':.. s r rats lialth pledge:My• wort Metro Transit Commrssrtn that . �i j`' •s- r --, club pledge:My bead ---.+ _ err Z = to clearer thinking,my aped to move moat ppoeoopp look n do tl$ t ' it y y ham a�lr:akc ROBIN F ' in the southwest suhunc� � -'ewe,:'-. - ''+- r =c� rnke and haltb•The cmcluslos may result to the '_: -- , - _ - i - to bens ' mY� i-N from t at�trsitiw d hind and the woatruo- f' _ —:_ - _ mhyv3ociub eeB w • nee dean of more'Part&Ride"lot in �~ p A rE m�mmyudry,my aa�m �Y Fair Eden Prairie,Chanhassen and '-- t- i; `•' �. ay my world. Waeorna The tea n over the race 15ye:ars,as new �'*' „IV_ >K t ° - _she and ime nark 4.0t�<4: a �< �- � 4 a. 1 H ttrams nitre- Aug.a,ro Statdmy. pprroofi�o�ttss erns _ r rt V°S's ,, t }` "Y ' pia 7m, mtmpleted,mats the popuLt' d c.y, #' q �..z • R oat wnrlt m the a , sr•the am is to estimated to inertia from • - i=«.- '; ay 'Ole'.Rtir•,• re. may�f - • 91 Currently_the dem exeaneenth a - s 'SC"ie3lr '"'L_.:.-.i-.asi°�' 1 M...r ee nLead4e�t me. C imumumiumminiummumw____ __ _ . . __ , __ __ ___ -J. _ - ------^ r -s- --e-:•;...,�R'-.°m'. _-4.-�- )-#.710f4^..F'3��-its::-";.s 74 4' 7.7_t'_ -.r.= .,•,-, -3.'e.• n Villager --Thursday, August 2,1990 - - - - • . 1 j R, _ . a.t$ pini. - - ons. - y f I •\ 7. T� made eas Y fycling , . . • First,the city provided a black bin to each resi- r•may sot remember the times when your - - to remind you to brush your teeth after a dence to use to collect their recyclables•—aewspa- - ; ore e bedtime,but today it's a habit you can per,glass,metal cans.-One of the*problems people • -- , pt to break. Maybe what made that find with recycling hay beenwhere to collect it now . . "*.o habit-forming was the realization that by -.a corner in the garage acid a few.paper bags leaves no .. ming,your teeth and breath wolid begin to excuse. rt.,causing more damage than you'd care to - Second, the recycling day is the same day,as = . ' bout. ; _ - . ,-garbage day.While some residents may find it hard that's what's happening with recycling in enough to remember garbage-day,this-gives them - ,:-.• - another reminder'to take the out to the Garb ly " ` ; , It n. / before work. •' • " ,;,,"� We'd like to think that the biggest factor in Y'`, _ llai = , getting people into recycling is,the_realization that without it,our landfills will continue to fill up and - ;y :,. :mes from the first three months of a new deteriorate the environment,as weli�as'our standard . . - - - • �_. ling program show that residents are of living. 's'"`,•-•' , `_.'-.:= =' ,; 5• :c',:'• '-: '- • n 10 the idea.A survey of garbage haulers Whether it's the ease of collection,or•theshame .- , •. sage of 70 percent participation,up from of pollution, -we're glad•to; 'that fin,' is • ". _ catching on,snd will become one of those habits ` '''„ - °, 25 percent during the experimental recycling "' �;_ , 'x-` - :., ••nducted for a year prior. How do we like brushing-your teeth--that are just-part of to t . • the jump?The reasons may relate to the daily routine, - ,.,:; -: .: ..,•1-i.,.!--"'r;:&-..-.-<.;. „ ?:�•=''= _ •.' y the program. : ••' • ;:,1 = 'David Pedersen _ ;ly�. •,_= y _ '. : ',..71-:,---' ., w -ni,-."„-' 44,6.42- !A _n • L.LL...;w:.,art-. . - - enators. . ortrarts o f courage? . -- .' f , _ _ _ _ H.Lpk '{ r denpuni e a should have gone -,: - -: •, • - etti, ►'Wednesday,July 25,the.full r. and voted not a0 dg- ' - • ' te voted to denounce Sen. t • - :^. on record _ , ;�,, ,.. renberger for his unethi- _ :�.= bounce: +` = _ • ►,aeEttaall dealings.If you -" `" However,if be thought bursa-` - Ap -• �er, Durenberger " i. __. .� .ni =_'- t�n ••.-bility for his financial . - . -`,,.:.4_ bipaRtsen ' , Q done its then be stiould-have. s • said that be would not. ' :- ra McBrydb . full Senate vote. The voted to denouooet - .. - -., • vas 96-0 to denounce his •4 '4 - - -' • Boschwitz did neither of these' ,:.. ,I always start to feel frantic . . , ,., "4 • ' thin,gs. Boschaitz those not'to -time of year,because I begin th ~v � '- 'decide whether Durenberger curt. realize that half of the summer ttiese last few weeks, _ most of• 1 .a has>m me °'' be denOUnCed. 'Hi chose and I haven't done• be.dignity be impressed - Thomas Li.,•apic . - � . :essentiall►,to•abstain • from the . the stuff I had planned on doing. me with his impas- - With Good Reason - 's voting. arr lt,i cio . '.- .,-:.During May,I begin to think .. r: position about all of the things I and my lull thannkthat be should ; • . • :; ' - 7Forgive my cynicism,but I - family can do once summer has 1 •--: of the seriousness of Durenberger was guilty of know: _ :. one of the reasons Bos-• - - • officially started:go camping,go bind lapses,I would be hard- ingly and intentionally violating = -chwitz chose ntx to take a stand is - swimming at the lake or,the pool .at fr.,.r:,:,as.Ow.arY,.Y And cr,wte rulm_ mit:tioes_and .-.. -- because•be_$up for reelection sod...]east twice a week,IF to Valkyi: I 1 Atus+ 2 , VISo c ,A tee. 9 b1 ree'dor C o -c C1ar1-,ass et-) CN\our,h a,s se_c , \'")."\\rv,Nesoio, 55 311 1 Ded-r J ► - We_ ,:y-)s+ .y-v e ck -+v wish .1 (3v q o o o4 WO( clt ' on loot- new ca ee r- c �\sne ! I* vAcks y � p\ease rv.,_ 4-0 k+--)ow i ou an dl re-�re51. %(-\ +o -c I nol & v b\CC-, o-r-C►c ke \ 4144 ' rea1\i does care. as-2k .- c Mows -'+hr.ou h On Cow.1,, ro £Scn- \k'rh2r - S : Q+ 17ersonc..6\e__d es . � r\ ai ' Pts ou L\OSe Cr+1\is csee r' and »,ova or c a � t W2 \'-04Q_ 100 CO vn* O-' or LJovf C_CarrN \LS r,en -s o s rr■ w.-"ch �r'or t (. �v���ov�' \foot' knVes-vQ...c,-\--ior, � w(2_ ogre._ Cork a-r "V‘�e� Q kl-k4k wo haue_ been dome_ or ovr o v r,r,ade_ en cep , -� rs no-\- w,.moo ti-k- s'e ck- -44- -N- we_ s l -0. e_vJe •h Q_ C.}I7_2n s 04- C\,\-&s Ser■ c ∎r, re Voos∎rq Ooh e7Cc.e P? tor10.k Pecsor ' - 110.-* ‘-‘0,3 aorNe- c. ' ob. ece. IS n o?vv:\ ,t'co. rs∎ ∎ar. SoQA-hecr' Ca.\.-g ocr t yes Sr\°° \\N ' cC o 0.r10 V o vc -comer+;t' . o o he be_ ve -kh ad a�• �o d w 50 od ' ea\-\--\, h ne ss cvn dl ros ec .-k- � PP P P i r-\%ss 100 ' SI:r,Lire _514„)..": Ct.""r■-th- Val-tr1/4 1 1 k v"), cLnd .o CA R._ \ck.roS I I 1 I 1 August 1 , 1990 Jim Chaffee Public Safety Director 690 Coulter Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 ' Dear Jim, I would like to thank you for the opportunity to help out the Public Safety Department, improve my communication skills, make some friends , and have a little fun. ' I have thoroughly enjoyed working with you, Scott, Carol , Beth and the rest of the department. My employment with the City has made this an enjoyable summer for me. I hope to be able to return in the future when my help is needed. ' Thanks for everything, especially the roses . They were an extremely enjoyable surprise ! I 'm sorry to see you leave, but I wish lots of ' luck to you and your family in your new adventure . Sincerely, LI( CILC6A. IL/U--KkLYYQ/L____ Andrea K. Dummer i 1 t,pc;e1 k-11114 t"lh. EAAA -1 d- ctlAttNtW THAT D' .11-kk> Ttt''11% lw. Ltr t`? Nor fu aIt- p 112 ► — I August 6, 1990 Pr MAI 1.DGA'T-100. VA E A091-44-41-1 WA.:5 511'1f1-i P, .17E,t-if '1 i TLc%-1 . IJo Ann Olsen �bbv-.. Senior Planner Chanhassen Planning Commission 696 Coulter Drive IChanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Jo Ann: IIThe purpose of this letter is to immediately voice our concern for an issue regarding the property on the southside of our homes (the old Lake Lucy II Road) . Our. understanding is that Paul Palmer has proposed that a "trail " be built connecting his development and the Pheasant Hill development. The issues are as follows: II1 . We bought these particular lots during the past few years, because we wanted privacy in our back yards. Those of us who purchased lots during I1927 checked with the city at the time of lot purchase to confirm that the road would in fact be removed, and we were told that the land would eventually be conveyed over to the home owners whose land is adjacent to it. Our developers also confirmed their understanding of this idea. Some IIof us were also told that because the property to the south of our lots was "DNR Designated Wetlands"; that 507. of the road would be added to this special area. This was the most critical issue for most of us regarding II our lot p!urcha=.es. We did not want homes, a road, or a trail immediately behind our- homes. . . we wanted and therefore purchased simple, natural and . private lots. 2. This "trail " is not included in the proposed Chanhassen Trail II system, and if it was to be, it should have been brought up at the time that our lots were purchased. II The information letter regarding this topic of discussion was inadequate with regard to: not enough notice (some of us received the Iletter for the Monday, July 23, meeting after Friday July 20, and were out of town until after the Monday meeting) . For some of us, that is the only letter received referencing this issue; some received NO letter regarding II the meeting that was held last week. And some of us read the public notice in the Saturday, July 21 issue of the Villager, (again after the fact. ) Equally important, there was absolutely NO mention of a "trail " system II linking the two neighborhoods. The one letter we received mentioned "vacating the property". We feel that an issue such as this warrants clear and ample notification, particularly during the popular vacation month of July. 4. It is now our understanding that the reason for this proposal in the II first place, is that Paul Palmer is interested in making a lot at the end of his development more "saleable". We can understand his concern here, Ibut certainly not at the expense of deteriorating our properties, and eliminating our privacy. All of the homes in his private development have ample privacy, and we are sure that none of them would appreciate a trail II through their backyards. And, if in fact it is for the Palmer children, their house is for sale anyway. II I . ' Page 5. Furthermore, if the landowner on the southside of our property is not interested in having 50%. of the property conveyed over to them, that is also understandable because it lies on the perimeter of their large lot. IIBut shouldn 't we home owners whose backyards it directly affects have some consideration as to the available alternatives regarding the outcome of the property now that the real issues (a "trail ") have been brought to the Itable? Perhaps an arrangement could be made for 100% of the property to be conveyed to the home owners with adjacent properties on the north side, instead of just 50%. I6. Paul Palmer did approach Aadne Eliassen, with just a light mention of the issue some time ago; again with no discussion of a "trail system". Then Palmer continued to the other homes, prefacing the conversation with Isomething like "according to everyone 'up there' it is o. k. " , pointing in the direction of the Eliassen home. Palmer did talk with most, but not all of the five home owners, and his comments eluded to the fact that we would not notice any impact. Obviously, nothing could be further from the truth. IIWe are all very angry, frustrated, and upset for the following reasons: a. PRIVACY - we appreciate, and enjoy the PRIVACY that we presently Ihave. This is the primary reason we purchased our lots; instead of lots at the end of the cul-da.-sac. b. EXPOSURE - because of the nature of our lots, our homes are very I high, with all three levels exposed. The proposed "trail " is very low, and we would have NO PRIVACY. Nor would it be possible to construct a privacy fence, or plant a hedge that would provide any privacy. We would be IIcompletely exposed to whom ever would be walking, riding, or standing on that "trail ". Ic. SECURITY - would be reduced greatly, because again, anyone could have access to our backyards, and the back of our homes. Additionally, those of us with young children would not feel comfortable with our Ichildren playing in our backyards, knowing that they could be approached by any stranger on the "trail ". IId. MOTORIZED VEHICLES - perhaps would not be legal , however , it would be very difficult to control. e. PROPERTY VALUES - would undoubtedly decrease, making our homes Iless marketable. . f. COST OF THE "TRAIL" - who would be responsible for the cost of building and maintaining the "trail "? It would be expensive and difficult Ito maintain because most of this low property has running or standing water. We certainly are not interested in being responsible for costs associated with this. Ig. DNR DESIGNATED WETLANDS - we are concerned that a "trail " would disrupt this natural setting, and do not want to negatively affect the wildlife. Again, this was part of the reason we purchased these particular " ' lots. II II I . I Page 3 In summary, there i s a significant decrease in value for we five home• . owners that this directly affects. Palmer 's development is not a part of II Pheasant Hill , and those home owners have known that since they made their purchase. They enjoy the same type of privacy that we do not intend to forfeit. We believe that this entire issue was pushed through the system by one individual , for the interest of one individual ; and it was in a Imanner that did not provide the affected property owners with ample notice, or the correct and complete information necessary to totally understand the issue, and the ramifications. As a result, our feelings were not known to Ithe city planning commission andlor City Council , and we strongly request that we five home owners be consulted prior to any final action. Please contact us, because we are looking forward to determining what our next step should be in stopping this "trail ". 32e6e444 4C4.41. IAadne and f:.ar i El i assen 6460 White Dove Drive 474-5= 90 934-�3413(W-k:ar-i )ig I 1M- II Glenda Hoo 6470 White Dove Drive 474-9407 541-2160 (W) / o-ek IHarlan and Linda Leopold 6490 White Dove Drive 474-357 I937 1 J6 -HAA4 $4,/ Jeff a` nd Barb Peshek I6480 White Dove Drive 474-3650 435-710064-Jeff) Jr Il / • -/ --dr i arren e� an• Lieva Schmidt ' I6450 White Dove Drive 474-1940 IIcc: Donald Chmi el , Mayor Ursula Dimler, Councilmember I Jay Johnson, Councilmember Tom Workman, Councilmember . - 1 ) • I I I I I I I ' I - O I- W W W -I Ln W J a. o_ U x z W W 0 ID' N J OU M O Z I- C N I a. Q 03 I- J O 0: O E W I W 0 IX O. a •■ J N m N I Q ? FO- Q 0 z a r w IN• Z W I- C } 0: Z £ N C I O «. O N D C WO U W U J 07 Z I U U U C to I- If) • •0 I • 0 a Cr O Q Q • E 0: I = Q z .. W a co n co C U m I fl _. U 0 U E ME E ME II=1 IME MN - , - 11111 111111 111111 • CHANHASSEN H.R.A. A C C O U N T S P A Y A B L E 08-13-90 PAGE 2 CHECK # A M O U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P O S E 041218 81.26 DONALD ASHWORTH TRAVEL + TRAINING 041219 480.00 BROWN'S AMOCO REP. + MAINT.,BLDG + GND 041220 1.82 BUSINESS ESSENTIALS, INC SUPPLIES, OFFICE 041221 144.40 CAMPBELL, KNUTSON, FEES, LEGAL 041222 1,168.75 HOISINGTON GROUP, INC. FEES, SERVICE 041223 265.75 LOTUS LAWN & GARDEN PROMOTIONAL EXPENSE 041224 2.84 MERLIN'S HARDWARE HANK PROMOTIONAL EXPENSE 041225 350.00 WMI SERVICES OF MN PROMOTIONAL EXPENSE 8 2,494.82 CHECKS WRITTEN TOTAL OF 9 CHECKS TOTAL 3,490.97 - CITYOF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147• CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 ' MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Hoffman, Recreation Supervisor ' FROM: Don Ashworth, City Manager ' DATE: August 7, 1990 SUBJ: 1990 Fourth of July Celebration, Commendation I was pleased to see the attached letter to the editor in the Chanhassen Villager. I am happy to see that your hard work on the ' 1990 Fourth of July Celebration did not go unnoticed by the community. I would also like to offer my congratulations and appreciation for the many hours you and Jerry worked to make this ' year's celebration a huge success. This celebration has grown tremendously over the years, which I believe is due to your creativity and enthusiasm. 1 Again, I commend you on a job well done. cc: City Council Administrative Section, August 13, 1990 Personnel File 11 La) a% 1 • 11. i -- 1 - 1 • •- - . . . " iters :-::Kudos to employee ---• lb the adftor: C : We are writing this letter in sp. ,--tVaticc for. outstanding Tr- mos coosisten y given by Park • employee,Mr.Toold • and Recreation Supervisor. • 1 Over the years, our family bas enjoyed participating in the Man- hassen-sponsored events coordinated • by our Park and Recreation • - I spent.At every event,Mr.Ho i... , stands out in the crowd.His smiling I 'face, sense of fair play, hard work , and eternal optimistic attitude make rim an invaluable asset to tbe city of , -Chanhassen. - _ • We know that the Park and Rec- nation Department is in transition • and fully a - it the extra efforts t by Mi. Ho h..•. and staff. Thanks Again!See you at the Octoberfastl Barbara Mick and Greg Blaafais Obanhaseen I. • ___ _ 1991_ 1991 International Special Olympics Games PREMIER SPONSORS Illln 1010 South 7th Street Clvitan International ' Drexel Burnham Lambert Incorporated iSPICiAI; suite 430 p OLYMPICS Minneapolis,MN 55415 Irwin Jacobs&Associated Companies (612)337-1991 Northwest Airlines, Inc. Volvo North America Corporation N IALIS I PAUL SANT PAUtr August 1, 1990 Mayor Tom Hamilton Chanhassen City Hall 690 Coultier Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Friend: In July of 1991, the Twin Cities will be hosting the largest sporting event in the world for that year, and consequently, the largest international multi-sport event ever held in Minnesota -- the 1991 International Special Olympics Games. 6,000 ' athletes, along with 2,000 coaches, 10,000 family and friends, 50,000 volunteers, and 25,000 to 50,000 spectators per day will participate in this exciting event. The impact this will have on our communities is phenomenal, which is why we would like to invite you to learn more about the 1991 Games and the influence they will have on our state. On Monday, September 17, 1990, the 1991 Games will host a "Preview Profile Breakfast" from 7:30 - 9:00 a.m. Our intention is to provide you with information about the. 1991 Games so you ' will be knowledgeable when we begin working in your areas. Since many of you have such busy schedules, we wanted to contact you now to insure you would not. miss this exciting and ' informative breakfast. An official invitation will be sent to you in a week, providing the location of the breakfast. Please make a note of the date on your calendar! We look forward to seeing you and most graciously appreciate your support. 1 Sincerely, Roy Smalley Executive Director 1991 International Special Olympics Games • Winning Over the World July 19-27,1991 IIr .ice CITY OF t, 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 ' (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 1 MEMORANDUM TO: City Council and Housing and Redevelopment Authority 1 FROM: Paul Krauss, Planning Director DATE: August 3, 1990 1 SUBJ: Redevelopment Proposal for the Hanus Site Proposed by Brad Johnson i On July 18, 1990, Brad Johnson's proposal to redevelop the Hanus 1 site with a Hardee's, auto care center, relocated car wash and retail buildings was reviewed by the Planning Commission. Staff's review of the project is explained in the attached report. Staff supported the proposal in concept but noted a variety of concerns 1 that would have to be resolved prior to the applicant's bringing a plan back for formal approval. The most prominent concerns included the desire to have architectural, landscaping, quality commensurate with the site's location at the edge of the Central Business District, adequate understanding of and dealing with traffic safety issues, dealing with drainage issues and other 1 design related factors. The Planning Commission discussed the project at length and ultimately recommended against approving it as a PUD since they did not believe that the inherent quality required of such a visible site was apparent from the submittals. 1 They believed that the development was overly intense and that it did not represent an advantageous project for the City. 1 On July 26, 1990, the proposal was reviewed before the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. The Planning Commission comments were carried forward and the applicant explored the original proposal plus a potential option to eliminate the car wash as a free standing entity, however, this would involve a substantially greater subsidy that had been originally requested. The HRA gave the proposal a mixed review with several members indicating a desire to see something done in a manner that gave the City control over the project but there was a general feeling that the current proposal was lacking in many areas. 1 The proposal was scheduled to be reviewed by the City Council at the August 13, 1990, meeting. I have just been informed by the applicant that he has withdrawn the proposal from consideration due i Brad Johnson Proposal j August 3, 1990 Page 2 to the poor reception of the project received before the Planning Commission and HRA. He has indicated that it is his intent to develop the site with minor small projects that are consistent with the underlying Highway Business zoning. Staff believes that some development of the site is possible and probable and we will work to ensure that it meets the highest standards possible under the ordinance. Issues that will confront the developer include site plan and district requirements, need to provide acceptable access and need to deal with the old conditional use permti that was issued for the Hanus building. As you may be aware, the firm of Stragar, Roscoe and Fausch, has been retained by the HRA to do an analysis of traffic issues in the downtown Chanhassen area. While they are continuing work on their overall traffic analysis of the downtown, staff asked that they accelerate the program relative to the Hanus redevelopment proposal to allow the results to be fed back into the design process for the development. I have attached a copy of this traffic report for your analysis. It is interesting to note that while they believe that traffic could be accommodated from the proposed development, , that it requires a substantially revised access design then had been illustrated. Most notably, it was believed that the access road needed to come on the south side of the site adjacent to the south side of what is now the existing Brown's Car Wash, rather than adjacent to the railroad tracks. This is primarily to avoid the stacking of cars on the tracks who are waiting to turn into the site. This report has been included for your review. When and if further developments are proposed for this property, staff will keep both the City Council and HRA advised. ATTACHMENTS 1. Staff report. 2. Traffic report. I C 911 PC O F PC DATE: 7/18/90 CC DATE: 8/13/90 111 C anim a EN \ 1 Y CASE #. 90-1 PUD By: Krauss/v 1 1 T S AFF REPORT PROPOSAL: Planned Unit Development - Concept Plan for an 1 Auto Service Center F- IZ LOCATION: Hanus Building and Gary Brown Car Wash - Great Plains QBoulevard U 1 j APPLICANT: Lotus Realty C P.O. Box 235 1 ^ Chanhassen, MN 55317 Q I 1 PRESENT ZONING: BH, Highway Business District ACREAGE: 4.5 acres 1 DENSITY: ADJACENT ZONING AND 1 LAND USE: N - RR Tracks, Commercial, Office -01, LAND and Residential S - Amoco Station and Hwy. 5 1 < E - Red-E-Mix plant (potentially to be Q acquired by the City) W - Commercial fronting W. 79th Street IILt! WATER AND SEWER: Available to the site. amm PHYSICAL CHARACTER. : The site is improved with the existing Hanus 1 building, outdoor storage and Gary Brown's Car Wash. 2000 LAND USE PLAN: Commercial i - __:._.....ra ,-.... , ,r, ---:.--- ii .-.*!;•■/ - r/ .41"1"--.,,, ,_ __,.. .„ ,..-_,,,.. -- . f fitr.tttl_if& # )i . nu - orbAst:44.-; 1 - - \...,_....,, vl R.E. zi m� pR LOTUS -" `, ' 6900, - .. ;,:e, tea- . •• - � ,)Ap $.OoeC ‘/ RY �� �✓ s°44 2 n; z,01 7000 "Vi ,/ 1 ��.4 VII,.. .---7 00 , ,„, .._ ‘.., � '" I■ �� �"r SHADOW MERE�� •. ► _ r �, 1 • RI ■ Emma \ SRO , a .-- •\' • '� c. \__ 7200 Ali9 .1_,-- ;.r/ f- . / . .�_ L A KE \©�1/47t y J v \,'� 1:_sd ,\/E: ‘ /... 44 y,s, i _ 730C - --1 ' • - _: . MentiOily/ON . at '.7'-- -VICO ;t:-' WWI iitiblir* 4_?.;P' ' ' -.i-W-4 morn 74`A. it4 1 . ........... o 0`61 Mir ip ("N , \ ` '� 8 -- 11 11"171 11 slit/f7� - -i-1 PIWtr-il �` , a er u01 '.� _w "`gal 4 Z `'� �ft.: ir_ 111.1:∎ .r. r n 4 'JA�1 .c .N .G _ � o Q IQ ail 11 *411/M WV- nr 1- 777H 1 ..���.����Ui� 11�.�`rurl 111 1111�1� TM T_._ �i� 111111 ��� ,— ---- 1 pe o - 3 10P ... 1,..■,;:z.-....-- . , „ihr Ado -.., ...:. At ...,,r4 ...10.1a : 1%7 miapity..,,i,-; a M •g- Z -gm' „‘ V. - f- k lib.. . _ - 4 ,.. :; .., no. ...... 01 O O 42 1 a -- --- -- 4 > I it ft.1�:� ���• �' 8100 1,. -�r �o:. 4i �1 _1 , ,-1.-i�- t1 1 1m►� * r` • j'',1 ���% 1 . ; we%_ -� 8200 , t•• PP;410111/0 Ili II . . . _ .___,:______. t item -- 8300 INII ,J ---,"---f/-1-. I • iilk .. %E SUSAN 4 ' .111011. // 41/ , .8..::a ' Auto Service Center PUD July 18, 1990 Page 2 ' PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicants are requesting PUD Concept Plan Review for a proposed redevelopment of the Hanus Building and Gary Brown Car Wash into the Chanhassen Auto Center. Uses on the property will ' include the construction of a new fast food restaurant, currently thought to be a Hardee's, redevelopment of the Hanus Building with an attached car wash into an auto service center and construction of a small two tenant retail building further to the east. All properties will be accessed by a new street extended parallel to and adjacent with the railroad tracks. The proposal is being reviewed in conjunction with HRA review of the redevelopment ' proposal. Although Mr. Brad Johnson has been in contact with the HRA regarding this proposal, it is not anticipated that he will receive any formal reviews from them until concept review before the Planning Commission and City Council is completed. Staff believes that the project in general is a worthy one and could be acceptable with refinement. We note that the site is a ' difficult one to develop due to its narrow configuration and difficult access which is limited to its frontage on Great Plains Boulevard. We also note that the site is currently in very poor condition with numerous junk trucks and other equipment and would strongly support its redevelopment into a project consistent with the importance of its location at one of the main gateways into the Central Business District. Staff supports the use of a PUD option for this proposal for several reasons including the difficulty of combining several underlying parcels and the development of four distinct buildings. To achieve the developer's and the City's goals for the property, it is imperative that development proceed in a coordinated manner. There would be joint use of access, utilities and drainage and we believe it is in the City's best interest to get uniform and high quality architecture and signage consistent with the site's prominent location. The general concept is one that appears to work in terms of access ' and layout. However, staff does have a number of concerns which are outlined in detail in this report. The most prominent ones include: ' 1. Access and traffic are critical concerns and are the subject of a study being performed by Stagar, Roscoe and Faush. Staff ' wishes to ensure that turning movements and stacking at critical intersections remains within acceptable levels of service and that traffic can be handled in a safe manner, both internally and externally. One significant recommendation is ' that the proposed street, which is being proposed as private on the submitted plan, should be a public right-of-way albeit one with diminished development standards in recognition of the difficulty of developing this site. We believe it should Auto Service Center PUD July 18, 1990 Page 3 ' be public given the high levels of traffic that will exist along with the desire to maintain safe access and the potential for expanding the road to the east should the Red-E- Mix site be redeveloped. 2. Parking provisions and internal circulation require further ' clarification and refinement. It does not appear that some of the uses are being provided with sufficient parking. 3. Intensity of development is quite high with high levels of hard surface coverage. Drainage issues need to be resolved as well as landscaping questions. Resolving these issues may result in the need to decrease the intensity of development on this site, particularly when viewed in the context of other recommendations. We are recommending that PUD Concept Plan Review be granted subject to the applicants responding to the recommendations contained in this staff report prior to submitting plans for formal review and approval. BACKGROUND/SITE CHARACTERISTICS ' The 4.5 acre site is comprised of three underlying parcels including the site containing Gary Brown's Car Wash, a vacant parcel and several combined lots comprised of parcels owned by Hanus. The conditional use permit for the Hanus property was approved in 1982 (Attachment #1) . Allowed uses included auto and truck repair with some outside storage of vehicles. The site is maintained in extremely poor condition with junk vehicles, boats, paving equipment and other materials scattered throughout. Internally, the building is currently undergoing some modifications under the conditional use permit for more auto repair related uses. However, the building is not in compliance with current building codes. ' The car wash was approved by a conditional use permit in 1983 (Attachment #2) . The building was built in compliance with existing regulations but the site has a number of inherent problems when reviewed today. The building is setback only 13 feet from Great Plains Boulevard right-of-way. Landscaping is minimal and the site's exit is partially located on the adjoining AMOCO site. The exit will be impacted by the current construction of the new AMOCO station since the AMOCO portion of this shared exit will be removed. ' Given the past usage and current condition of the site, staff believes it would be prudent to have it tested for the presence of hazardous materials. Any contamination would need to be ' Auto Service Center PUD July 18, 1990 Page 4 appropriately treated and could greatly increase development costs. ' OVERALL CONCEPT The PUD proposes an auto oriented development around the existing Hanus building as the centerpiece. Gary Brown's car wash will be ' relocated from it's present site on Great Plains Boulevard to a site adjacent to the Hanus building. A fast food restaurant, currently shown as a Hardee's, with a drive-thru service, is ' located at the corner of the site near Great Plains Boulevard with a small 7,500 square foot retail building located at the extreme eastern end. In addition, the location of a Hardee's fast food restaurant promises to generate significantly high levels of traffic. This situation will be further explored in the Traffic subheading and is a subject of analysis by Stagar, Roscoe and Faush, consultants currently under contract with the HRA. The site is an extremely difficult one to utilize. It is wedged into a rather long narrow piece of ground between the railroad tracks and Hwy. 5. The parcels have frontage on Hwy. 5 but will not be allowed access directly to it. Access at this point is limited to a single curb cut on Great Plains Boulevard. Earlier ' plans considered the potential of a connection to the new Hwy. 101 intersection. However, the most recent plans for that highway improvement indicate that the connection would be hazardous and difficult to support. ' Based upon our recommendation, the proposal is being developed as a PUD. We believe this is essential for several reasons. Given ' the limitation of the site, it is not reasonable to expect a development to comply with all normal district standards. More importantly, it is essential that the PUD be utilized to ensure the proper workings of a development that would be comprised of a number of different uses. It is staff's goal that this project be developed not only with cost utilization of access and utilities but also with a common architectural theme and signage that is ' vindictive of its location at a major entrance into the Chanhassen CBD. ' ACCESS/TRAFFIC As proposed, the plans call for providing access via a single common private drive located adjacent to the railroad tracks. ' Conceptually, placing the road in this location makes sense for several reasons. It frees up as much of the site as possible for development while providing for a comprehensive means of access to each of the various buildings that are being constructed. The plan has been modified from meetings with staff and will include features such as a right turn lane on north bound Great Plains Boulevard and three exit lanes with a free right turn lane exiting Auto Service Center PUD July 18, 1990 Page 5 the site onto Great Plains. In addition, the internal curb cuts on the private drive have been reduced with the closest one to Great Plains relocated to the east to provide more acceptable stack movement for distances. Staff has discussed the nature of the road with the City Engineer ' and we both concur that it is our recommendation that the road be built as a public street, albeit one that may not meet full dimensional standards. We take this position since it will serve , a large volume of traffic located on a number of individual parcels and may ultimately need to be extended further to the east to service any redevelopment that may occur on the Red-E-Mix site. We note that our standard commercial street right-of-way is 60 feet with a 31 foot driving surface. The current proposal had no right- of-way dedication since it is private and has a 30 foot driving surface. It is our recommendation that satisfactory service requires a 31 foot paved area and we are recommending that a 45 foot right-of-way instead of a 60 foot right-of-way be provided. Compromising on the right-of-way poses some maintenance problems which would need to be dealt with by easements on either side of the street permitting maintenance activities to occur. We also note that the street is being shown with a 5 foot setback along the railroad tracks which is insufficient to provide landscaping illustrated on the plan and to allow for maintenance activities such as snow plowing. We are recommending that the curb line start 10 feet from the railroad tracks. This configuration will be tight but appears to still fit in to the narrowest dimension of the site which is found between the railroad tracks and the northwest corner of the existing Hanus building. The road should incorporate a turnaround area at its terminus as is required in all sites in the City. We note that the roadway entrance at Great Plains Boulevard is only 30 feet wide which is insufficient to accommodate the 3 lanes being shown at the intersection. Minimum lane width should be 12 feet mandating a 36 foot wide road section at this point. Lastly, we note that the western most curb cut serving Hardee's is shown as an entry/exit and believe this should be limited to a entrance only with an exit only configuration located on the eastern side of the building to provide greater stacking distances for traffic that may back up from the intersection. The concern for stacking is exacerbated by the conflict between the railroad tracks and right turning traffic attempting to re-enter into the CBD. Traffic is a major concern with this site. Our concerns deal with the volume of trips that would be generated from a site that is relatively difficult to access but more importantly the conflicts generated by turning movements entering and exiting the site. These conflicts are exacerbated by the above mentioned proximity of the railroad tracks, by existing curb cuts in the vicinity, by the II IIAuto Service Center PUD July 18, 1990 1 Page 6 location of 79th Street as it is extended to the west and due to the proximity of the Hwy. 5 intersection. II Traffic issues concerning this site are potentially one of the major aspects of its redevelopment. We would recommend that 1 development on this site be worked backwards. By this we mean that a maximum number of allowable turning movements at the intersection should be computed and factored back into the maximum allowable II density on this site. We do not wish to have this development result in unacceptable levels of service at local intersections and hazardous conditions on adjoining streets. I The report from Stagar, Roscoe and Faush is not yet completed. Since traffic is such a major issue, review of the next stage of the PUD (development plan) should not occur until the report is completed with recommendations on the proposed PUD. PARKING/INTERNAL ACCESS IIInternal circulation and parking layouts have been extremely difficult to work out. The primary reasons for this are the developer's preconceived notions of the size and dimensions of the II fast food restaurant, the size of the proposed new car wash and the fact that we are working on an existing structure with the Hanus building. The architects have done a reasonably good job of accommodating many of these concerns but further work remains to be I done. Above we noted a concern dealing with the western most curb cut to Hardee's and a proposal that it be a one way entrance only. I Other curb cuts onto the street are generally reasonable, although we believe the two curb cuts located immediately northeast of the Hanus building should be combined into a single point since the 30 foot separation between them does not allow sufficient distance to Iresolve conflicting turning movements. Internal circulation for the exit of the car wash is also somewhat I unusual since it utilizes an exit into the one way flow around the Hardee's restaurant before exiting onto the new street or driveway. Although this is unusual, we think it may work given the relatively low and infrequent traffic levels that a car wash typically II generates at its exit. We note that the car wash itself has sufficient stacking room for 2 to 3 cars in each lane which should be adequate to meet normal needs. The car wash exit does cause a I problem in that it conflicts with several parking stalls designed to serve the Hardee's restaurant. These are the diagonal stalls located immediately northeast of the point in which the car wash 1 exits into the Hardee's lot. We believe that the first 2 stalls should be eliminated since these cars would be backing out into oncoming cars exiting the car wash. IParking adequacy remains a concern, both from the standpoint of the 1 Auto Service Center PUD 1 July 18, 1990 Page 7 1 number of stalls provided and from their location of the use being served. We note that the reconfiguration of the private drive into a public street as outlined previously and other site changes proposed elsewhere in this report may result in a reduction of available stalls beyond what is illustrated on the proposed plan. Based on the proposed document, we note several apparent discrepancies. For example, 61 stalls are provided for the Hardee's restaurant when the ordinance requires one space for every 60 feet for fast food restaurants resulting in a requirement for 75 stalls. This standard is based on the extremely high turnover that fast food restaurants typically create and is based on a number of case studies around the Twin Cities. We are reluctant to deviate from this standard. Moving to the east, we note that the car wash has 9 stalls provided plus sufficient stacking room for 2 to 3 cars in each lane. The ordinance does not provide any guidance of establishing a parking requirement for car washes but based on anecdotal experiences, we believe it to be sufficient. The redevelopment of the Hanus building into an auto service center constitutes another parking problem. The existing 18,225 square foot structure is being provided with 40 stalls. Eighteen of these stalls are to be located at the rear of the building which may or may not be effective in serving the needs that are generated. We note that the ordinance does not have a standard established for this type of use, although we do note that if the straight retail requirement was applied the requirement would be for 91 stalls, greatly in excess of what is available. It is our recommendation that the applicant undertake some analysis of existing auto mall type centers that have been constructed around the Twin Cities and supply the City with information pertaining to parking standards that have been applied and how successful they have been. Lastly, we note that the eastern most retail buildings generate a parking requirement of 38 stalls but they are providing 49 which ' could allow for the stalls to be utilized for other uses particularly the Hanus building if this makes sense from an operational standpoint. ' Truck access and unloading is not clearly defined from the submitted document. We believe that trucks that will service these properties would have a difficult time maneuvering on the site as it is currently proposed. The truck loading area on the proposed eastern retail building would need to be provided with suitable screening to avoid direct views of this area from Hwy. 5. ' ARCHITECTURE Throughout our discussions with the applicant, staff has stressed , the need for architectural continuity, both on this development itself and with the remainder of downtown which this will serve as a gateway. At this point, we have discussed this matter ' 1 1 Auto Service Center PUD July 18 , 1990 1 Page 8 conceptually with the applicant and his architects but have little in the area of detail. We believe the importance of this factor 1 cannot be over stressed since the strip retail/auto service center built in a disjointed manner combining use of an existing block building with fast food architecture does not, in our opinion, 1 represent the type of image that the Chanhassen CBD should have at one of it's major entrances. We believe that the Hanus building can be improved at a relatively moderate expense and brought into conformity with an architectural style that is selected. We are 1 concerned with direct views of the overhead doors from Hwy. 5 on the Hanus building and from the car wash since the site would be regraded in a manner which makes these areas much more visible then 1 is currently the case today. In the applicant's narrative, they describe the Hardee's as a buff colored brick building with wood shake shingle roof in keeping with the context of Chanhassen. We 1 do not have the actual plans of this and these proposals may in fact be acceptable, however, it needs to be reviewed in context with the entire architectural theme. The City's Building Official has indicated that there are a series of building and fire code .1 compliance issues with the existing Hanus Building. The applicant should develop plans to resolve these concerns. 1 LANDSCAPING The landscaping concept plan that has been developed provides I little detailed information that will be needed to review the plan. This problem is compounded by that fact that no grading plans have been developed. Grading and landscaping are normally reviewed together. Conceptually, we have discussed the Hwy. 5 exposure as II one of great importance. While we understand the need to provide acceptable and increased site visibility, and do not object to this, we believe that there are many facets of this site that I should be screened from view. These include overhead doors, trucking loading areas, trash storage areas, and direct views of parking lots. We believe this can be achieved while promoting 1 visibility of the building's proper and related signage. We are concerned that some of the setbacks that are being proposed are extraordinarily narrow, often decreasing to as little as 5 feet. A 5 foot strip does not provide sufficient room for landscaping. 1 We made comments earlier pertaining to the landscaping that is being proposed on the north side of the access road along side the railroad. A 5 foot strip in this area for trees is not acceptable II and will not work since this does not allow sufficient room for vehicular maneuvering, snow plowing and related activities. II In a related matter, hard surface coverage on this property has not been computed but would appear to be rather high from the drawing. This is not necessarily objectionable given the site's location within the CBD and under the PUD ordinance flexibility with this 1 and other standards are allowed. However, we believe that this 1 1 Auto Service Center PUD July 18, 1990 Page 9 , must be compensated by well developed landscape plan that maximizes the utilization of the main green spaces. Internal parking lot landscaping which is required by ordinance is sufficient on this plan. SIGNS/LIGHTING , No details are provided on site lighting at this juncture. Site lighting should be uniform throughout the development and consistent with other projects in the Chanhassen CBD. We have discussed signage with the applicant and there is some information contained in the concept plan although it is to be expected there is insufficient detail to provide a full review at this point. We are concerned that the amount of signage indicated may be somewhat excessive. We note that there are three pylon signs and at least two of which will be used to advertise the Hardee's restaurant. In addition, there are two large ground mounted monument signs overlooking Hwy. 5, plus we assume there will be ample signage provided on the buildings themselves which will be visible over a relatively large area. In the past, most recently with the Market Square development, the City has required the submittal of an overall comprehensive sign package that recognizes that this area is being developed as a PUD and that signage should be handled as comprehensively as possible. It is our expectation that the plans that will be submitted for formal approval will provide sufficient information for review and will achieve this goal. DRAINAGE On a number of occasions in the past we have discussed drainage ' with the applicant. Staff is concerned that drainage has not been given sufficient attention in the development of this plan. We note that at the present time there is no proposed on site retention while there is obviously a large increase in hard surface coverage. We are recommending that a certified engineer be retained to develop an acceptable drainage plan prior to any submittals for formal review. We believe this factor is extremely important since if any on site retention is required, it can only be accommodated by displacing buildings or parking since the site is essentially fully utilized. In addition, grading plans with sufficient detail should be developed to permit a comprehensive review. TIMING OF DEVELOPMENT 1 The plans refer to a phased development program starting in November of 1990 with completion in the summer of 1991. Staff has 11 II ' Auto Service Center PUD July 18, 1990 IIPage 10 no problem with this time frame, if this is in fact what will be II agreed to. However, we do note that in discussions with the applicant there has been a number of instances during which it was indicated that the removal of junk trucks and vehicles and unacceptable industrial uses from the property would be phased over I what I believe to be a longer period of time as leases and financing permit. Staff would recommend against allowing the redevelopment to proceed under these circumstances. We believe 1 that the uses and materials found on these properties at this point in time are highly incompatible with a quality commercial redevelopment of the site. Therefore, we ask that this information be clarified by the applicant. IIPLATTING/VACATIONS II The site would need to be replatted with new right-of-way dedicated and old underlying easements and right-of-ways vacated. We would anticipate that this documentation will be prepared and submitted Ifor concurrent review. UTILITIES II No utility information has been provided at this time. The site is fully serviceable by city utilities but plan development needs to be undertaken by the applicant to resolve utility service issues IIprior to submittal for formal approval. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS IIStaff recommends that the proposed Chanhassen Auto Service Center be given PUD Concept Plan approval, however, approval is contingent upon the satisfactory resolution of the following items prior to IIsubmitttal of plans for formal PUD approval. 1. Provide soil testing data indicating that the site is free of 1 hazardous materials or if they are found to be present, prepare a plan to resolve teh matter with projected costs. I 2. The recommendations of the SRF traffic report should serve as the basis for site plan development by establishing maximum development intensity. I The internal street should be designed as a public right-of- way under guidelines established in the report. These allow for reduced right-of-way but require a turnaround, wider lanes I at Great Plains Boulevard and a shift of the road 5 feet to the south. The western most Hardee's curb cut should be an entrance only. II II I Auto Service Center PUD July 18, 1990 Page 11 3. Revised internal ciruclation and parking as outlined in the report. Resolution of these issues may require reductions in building size. Prepare parking data to justify provisions for the converted Hanus Building. 4. Prepare architectural plans that will provide for a coordinated architectural theme for all three buildings that is consistent with high quality development that reflects the sites location at a gateway into the CBD. Minimize direct views of garage doors from Hwy. 5. Develop plans for resolving building code problems with the existing Hanus Building. 5. Develop a detailed landscaping plan that responds to the issues raised in the staff report. 6. Develop comprehensive lighting and signage plans responding to 1 issues raised in the staff report. 7. Provide comprehensive grading and drainage plans for review. , Retain a professional engineer to prepare drainage calculations. Resolving drainage issues may require a combination of on-site and/or off-site improvements that could i restrict development intensity and add to the cost of development. 8 . Provide clarification of development phasing to ensure that , the entire site will be redeveloped in a reasonable period of time. 9. Develop utility plans for approval. 10. Submit documentation required to replat the site. ' ATTACHMENTS 1. Hanus conditional use permit. ' 2. Gary Brown Car Wash conditional use permit. 3. Memo from Asst. City Engineer dated July 6, 1990. 4. Memo from Fire Marshal dated June 20, 1990. 5. Memo from Building Official dated June 25, 1990. 6. PUD Concept Plans. I • , / CITY OF CHANHASSEN {� f CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT HANUS AUTO AND TRUCK BODY SHOP ' WHEREAS, application has been made by Donald Hanus for a conditional use permit to construct an Auto and Truck Body Shop on a tract of land within the City, the location of the proposed auto and truck body shop and retail sales facility upon said premises ' and the legal description of said tract being as shown on Exhibits A and B hereto attached; and ' WHEREAS, said premises are within the Central Business District of the City Zoning Ordinance, which requires a conditional use permit for the proposed use; and ' WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission has given consideration to the application and has recommended the grant of a conditional use permit upon certain conditions; and ' WHEREAS, the City Council has given due consideration to said applic- ation and the foregoing recommendation; ' NOW, THEREFORE, a conditional use permit is hereby granted to the applicant herein to erect an auto and truck body shop upon the described premises, subject to the following terms and conditions, . all of which shall be strictly complied with as being necessary for the protection of the public interest: ' 1. Permit Not Assignable. This permit is personal to said applicant, and shall not be assigned without written consent of the City. ' 2. Description of Property. The premises subject to the within conditional use permit and the location of the proposed auto and truck body shop and retail sales facility shall be as shown on Exhibits A and B hereto attached. 3. No Open Storage. No open storage of materials shall be allowed after closing hours except for wrecked vehicles that may be ' brought in at night and except as permitted by §7 of this permit. 4. No Outside Work. No work shall be performed on any vehicle ' while the vehicle is standing in a parking area; and no work shall be performed on any vehicle while standing outside the body and frame shop building. 5. Roadway Easement. There shall be a dedication to the City of an easement for public right of way, street and utility purposes as more particularly described on Exhibit C attached hereto and made a part hereof. Said easement shall be known as West 79th Street. 6. Paving and No Parking Zone. By the acceptance of this permit, the applicant acknowledges that there is an immediate public need for the improvement of that portion of West 79th Street as I described in Exhibit C attached hereto and made a part hereof, which lies between the easterly right of way line of Great Plains Boulevard and the easterly line of that certain cul-de-sac which is depicted on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof, by the paving of said street to a 9-Ton capacity and a 26-foot width. Applicant further acknowledges that a public need exists for the official desig- nation of that portion of West 79th Street which is described in the previous sentence as a "no parking zone" under the applicable ordinanc� of the City. 7. Open Sales . Open sales and storage of trucks shall be re- stricted to ten (10) trucks at any one time. 8. Open Storage. There shall be no storage of business vehicles , ' other than those of applicant's auto and truck body shop, on the pre- mises subject to the within conditional use permit. 9. Grading of West 79th Street. Grading of West 79th Street ' shall be at a level which makes the street easily accessible to the Kurvers and Klingelhutz properties lying westerly of the subject property. 10. Drawings Incorporated. The developer shall be bound by the scope of the drawings as presented by the developer to the City Council, at its May 2, 1977 meeting; copies of said drawings are attached here- to as Exhibits A and B. 11. No Other Business . No other business except that shown on Exhibit A shall be carried out on the premises subject to this condi- tional use permit. 12. Electrical Service. Electrical service to the applicant's facilities on the aforementioned property shall be provided by underground power lines. 13 . Screening. The north and west sides of the aforementioned premises shall be screened to block the premises from the view of neighboring properties. 14. Bond Required . A cash bond, or a corporate surety bond approved by the City Attorney, shallle posted with the City to insure I the performance of the required landscaping. The amount of said bond shall be determined by City staff. 15. Public Welfare. The establishment, maintenance, and opera- ' tion of the use shall not be detrimental to nor endanger the public health, safety, comfort or general welfare. 16. Nuisance. The activities conducted on the premises shall not cause the emission of noxious odors nor cause noise. The use shall not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property nor diminish nor impair property values within the immediate vicinity. -2- ' I . II17. Other Regulations. The applicant shall comply with all City ordinances, state laws, and regulations of state agencies and II departments. 18. No Chances in Use Permitted. The use of the proposed struc- tures shall be limited to an auto and truck body shop and retail sales facility; and no changes in the use shall occur except as may be permitted by an amended conditional use permit or by a rezoning of the premises. I19. Proof of Title. The applicant shall furnish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that he has acquired fee title to I the premises involved herein prior to commencement of construction. Said evidence shall include a boundary survey prepared by a licensed surveyor. 120. Permit Subject to Review. The City reserves the right to review the within conditional use permit at any time to determine compliance with all conditions of the permit; and if the City deter- I mines that the developer has not strictly complied with the terms of the permit, the permit may be terminated at the option of the City. All City expenses incurred in the enforcement of the within permit II shall be the obligation of the applicant, and may be recovered by the City as a special assessment against the within described premises. 21. Standards Applicable. The City Council and Planning Commis- ! sion have determined that in the grant of the within conditional use permit, the standards of §23 .06, as- amended, of the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance have been met. I22. Acceptance . No permits for grading, building or erecting signs shall be issued until the developer has accepted the within Iconditional use permit. 23 . Grading Plan. No permit for grading shall be issued and the developer shall perform no grading of the subject property until the I developer' s grading plan has been reviewed by City staff for purposes of verifying that said grading plan is in complete conformity with all of the provisions of the within permit. Said grading plan shall I include existing contours, proposed grading elevations, drainage configurations, storm sewer catch basin and invert elevations , spot elevations, proposed road profiles, location and candlepower of all illuminaries, and location of exterior trash and garbage storage areas. I24. Landscape Plan. The developer agrees to prepare and submit to City staff a landscape plan which shall include location, type and I diameter of all proposed plantings, and descriptions of and locations of all screening devices. - No landscaping permit shall be issued and the developer shall perform no landscaping until after said landscape I plan has been reviewed by City staff for purposes of verifying that said landscape plan is in conformity with all of the provisions of the within permit. All landscaping shall be completed and in place by May 15, 1978. I II _3_ 1 (•' '' 25. Building Permit/Fast Track Building System. No building II permit shall be issued until complete building plans have been sub- mitted by the developer and received by City staff for purposes of 111 verifying that said building plans are in full conformity with all of the provisions of the within permit. If, however, the developer chooses to proceed using the "fast track buildingsystem" , the prepa- ration of mechanical plans and electrical plans and the submission of I said mechanical and electrical plans to the:City staff for the above described review may, at the developer's option, be postponed until completion of the frame body and frame shop structure. The previous I sentence notwithstanding, no electrical or mechanical construction shall occur until after the above described review of the electrical- and mechanical plans. Provided, however, that it is a condition of II this permit that the construction of .any buildings upon said premises shall be completed by December 31, 1977 . Adopted this day of June, 1977. I Ztat 40112111 MAYOR Attest: I City Clerk/Managed-�" ' I I ACCEPTANCE The undersigned owner of the above premises hereby accepts the terms II and conditions of the permit herein granted, and agre s to be bound by the terms thereof. Signed this _;.?..9 day of , 1977.1 Dona • a u- ' A. ii 1,ii! ......, IIDar ene Hanu II II II -4- CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1 . Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set ' forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants a conditional use permit for: The construction and operation of a car wash in the C.B.D. , Central Business District. ' 2. Property. The permit is for the following described property in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota: (See attached Exhibit "A" . ) ' 3 . Conditions . The permit is issued subject to the following conditions: ' 1 . That the building depicted in the official site plan be shifted 5 feet to the west. 2. That the applicant enter into an indemnity agreement with the ' City holding the City harmless for any costs in restoring the concrete curb and bituminous hard surface roadways constructed over the permanent 15 foot sanitary sewer easement. 4. Termination of Permit. The City revoke th Y ma Y the permit following a ' P g public hearing under any of the following circumstances : material change of condition of the neighborhood where the use is located; violation of the terms of the permit. 5. Criminal Penalty. Violation of the terms of this 1 conditional use permit is a criminal misdemeanor. /� Dated: �S.d.{; S� /9P3 CITY OF • HASSEN ' By: 4.` s Mayo By: Its Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) The fo egoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,6 6��, �„J , 19a, by Thomas L. Hamilton, Mayor , and Don Ashworth, City Manager of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. (14444, 4VAG-eLar-- 1 N tart' S• 1 1 1 CITYOF CIIANIIASSEN �^ 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 ' (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 MEMORANDUM TO: Jo Ann Olsen, Senior Planner FROM: Charles Folch, Assistant City Engineer DATE: July 6 , 1990 ' SUBJ: PUD/Concept Plan Review for the Chanhassen Auto Service Center - Hanus Building PUD File No. 90-2 I have reviewed the PUD/Concept Plan for the Chanhassen Auto Service Center and find that I am in agreement with many of the ' findings and recommendations in Planning Director Paul Krauss ' memo dated June 26 , 1990 . ' The site has existing structures , features and boundary facili- ties which will greatly influence the final plan layout. Traffic generation, parking adequacy and rainfall runoff rate control will be key issues in defining the density and extent of imper- ilvious areas for the development. When more information pertaining to utility design, grading and ' drainage are supplied by the developer 's engineer, a more detailed review of these issues can be made. I recommend appro- val of the PUD/Concept plan for the proposed Chanhassen Auto Service Center contingent upon the ten (10 ) stipulations from the ' aforementioned memo. r i r r r I CITY OF 10 i i CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 1 (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 I I MEMORANDUM TO: JoAnn Olsen, Senior Planner I FROM: Mark Littfin, Fire Marshal DATE: June 20, 1990 1 SUBJ: P.U.D. #90-2 I 1 . Submit utility plan for fire hydrant locations and possible 1 additional hydrants . 2 . Curb cuts must be reviewed by Engineering and Fire II Department . I I I I II I I II II IMMO ATE (mm/dd/yy) : 06/25/90 TOz Paul krause TITLE/TO: Planning Director IROM: Steve A. Pirchman TITLE/FROM: Building Official SUBJECT: 90-2 PUD (Hanus Building) II.: The building is now classified as an H-4 occupancy with offices occupying less than 10% of the floor area. The building must be sprinklered if the I11classification changes. The designation as an Auto Service Cent* r s not detailed enough to determine the correct occupancy classification. Applicable permits - .' -r^/'ections will be required prior to any new tenants II. ccupying the building or e.4isting tenants changing the nature or location of xisting occupanrie�. Proposed changes to the building to blend in with the nature of the new development would also require permits. I I I I II I I II . I I I II LOTUS REALTY SERVICES 545 WEST 78th STREET, P.O. BOX 100 CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 9344538 RECEIVED AUG 0 81990 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN August 6, 1990 Paul Kraus Planning Director. City of Chanhassen 1 Subject: Iianus Property Development Proposal (1UD) Dear. Paul ; This letter will confirm our discussion and decision to remove the Hanus land PUP from the August 13th Council agenda. The project cannot procede without the whole-hearted support of ' the flanninr Commission, nA and. Hardees. Support from the Planning Commission and HRA was not evident and the FUD and site planning process has discouraged Hardees. 1 During the next two weeks we will review our alternatives and the traffic study. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, ' 7tts s Brad Johnson 1 . , . 41.1c: "Minnesota Pollution Control Agency I520 Lafayette Road, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155 eflittelP(612) 296-6300 MINNESOTA 1990 RECEIVED IAugust 2, 1990 AUG 0 3 1990 CERTIFIED MAIL IRETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED CITY OF CHANHASSEN REPLY WITHIN TEN DAYS OF RECEIPT I Mr. Dan Hanus �. D.K.H. Inc. S 6071 Valewood Drive f.7"" Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 II M Dear Mr. Hanus: [ -4gr `" RE: Diesel and Waste Oil Spill At Your Chanhassen Facility, July-31,' 1990, Adjacent To Highway 5 and Highway 101 I As I discussed with Don Hanus of D.K.H. Inc. , the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has knowledge that a spill of waste oil and diesel fuel occurred on a site which you own and operate. The site is northeast of the intersection of Highway 5 and Highway 101 in Chanhassen, Minnesota. Specifically, waste oil was I spilled on the east side of your facility from several barrels. The barrels were full of waste oil and the waste oil had spilled, drained and stained soil around the barrels and towards the yard drain. There was physical evidence of the oil I around the yard drain and in the ditch which the drain discharges to. The waste oil spilled was your company's and was spilled by your company personnel as told to me by Don Hanus. In addition, there was evidence of diesel fuel spilled in IIthe yard around several tanks and in the parking area. For your information Minnesota Statute § 115.061 (Duty to Notify) requires any person to notify the MPCA of spills of such materials under their control, and to I recover the material as rapidly and as thoroughly as possible. The full text of this law is attached. This law has been in effect since 1969 and clearly applies to this situation. No notification of the MPCA was made by your employees or I you. No attempt at recovery has yet been made by your employees or you. Because no report was made as required to the MPCA, the volume of the spill was unknown when we spoke. IIn regards to the waste oil, no recovery with sorbant like floor-dri, sand or cat litter was attempted. Because of this, the spill may have leached into the soils in your yard and the only option for cleanup is excavation and prover disposal. II We do require soil testing of the excavation to define the extent of cleanup and also of the excavated soils so that proper disposal can take place. Because you have not taken responsibility for cleaning the spilled waste oil in the ditch, I the MPCA has hired the state contractor for this purpose and will expect reimbursment from you. I In addition to the above, and in regards to the diesel fuel, diesel fuel was found in the drainage ditch, in the culvert which drains your yard, in a swamp and a stream which the ditch drains to, and in your yard. Samples were taken with Dons approval. You have not taken responsibility for this cleanup and therefore I Regional Offices: Duluth• Brainerd• Detroit Lakes• Marshall• Rochester I Equal Opportunity Employer Printed on Recycled Paper Mr. Dan Hanus Page Two August 2, 1990 the MPCA has also hired the state contractor for this cleanup. Again the state will expect reimbursement. If you wish to take responsibility and control of the cleanup, please contact me. This was made clear to you on July 31, 1990, and on August 1, 1990, by me. Because the spill on your yard has still not been cleaned up, you must take the following steps: • 1. The barrels of waste oil must be properly removed and disposed immediately. ' 2. The contaminated soils must be removed and disposed. Excavation and sampling — must conform with the enclosures "Excavation of Petroleum Contaminated Soil" and "Soil and Ground Water Analysis at Petroleum Release sites". 3. You must provide proper containment for all above ground tanks. Please reply to this letter in writing within 10 days of receipt. Your reply should contain the cleanup and procedures you intend to use. If you start your yard cleanup sooner than the 10 days, please inform me so that an MPCA employee can be scheduled to be on site. If this office does not recieve reimbursement for its costs and/or if you do not commit to cleaning up the spilled oil in your yard, then the MPCA will be forced into legal action and quite possibly penalty action against you and your company to recover our costs and to enforce state laws. If you have any questions, or if I can be of assistance in yourcleanup planning, please call me at 643-3441. Sincerely 1.</ -et/kr 1, , Kevin Faus Aboveground Tanks/Spills Unit , Tanks and Spills Section ' Hazardous Waste Division KF:jr ' cc: Mark Littfin, Fire Marshal, Chanhassen Michael Lein, Carver County Solid Waste Officer, Chaska , Enclosures: Excavation of Petroleum Contaminated Soil Soil and Ground Water Analysis at Petroleum Release Sites Jar Headspace Analytical Screening Procedure Minn. Stat. § 115.061 (Duty to Notify) 1 • E H STRGARROCO -FAUSC , INC. ' CONSULTING ENGINE- SERS TRANSPORTATION■ CIVIL■ STRUCTURAL ■PARKING■ LAND SURVEYORS SRF No. 0901391 MEMORANDUM TO: Paul M. Krauss Gary G. Warren City of Chanhassen ' FROM: Dennis Eyler DATE: August 2, 1990 ' SUBJECT: HANUS DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY ' After completing a review and traffic analysis of the subject proposal, the following comments and recommendations are presented for your consideration: • Traffic volumes generated by the proposed development are summarized in Table 1. Site development trip generation are shown in Figure 1--Trip Generation. • The p.m. peak hour directional trip distributions for the proposed development (see Figure 2--Directional Trip Distribution) were developed from 1989 average daily traffic ' volumes (ADT) and 2010 average daily traffic forecasts on T.H. 101, T.H. 5 and Great Plains Boulevard. The 2010 (future) forecasts assume T.H. 101 on a new alignment. Instead of running along 78th Street and Great Plains Boulevard, T.H. 101 will turn south along Dakota Avenue ' and join T.H. 5 until turning south again along a new alignment west of Great Plains Boulevard (see Figure 3-- Proposed T.H. 101 Alignment) . Since T.H. 101 will no longer ' run along Great Plains Boulevard, adjacent to the proposed development, the traffic levels are expected to drop from an ADT of 7,500 to 6,000. ' • Based on the direction trip distribution, the p.m. peak hour traffic volumes were assigned to the roadway system within the study area. The results of the traffic assignment are shown in Figure 4--Site Traffic Assignment. • The existing and future operations of the intersection of ' T.H. 101 and the main driveway for the proposed development were analyzed using the unsignalized module of the Highway Capacity Software. The analysis assumes stop sign control on the driveway. Suite 150, One Carlson Parkway North, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55447 612/475-0010 FAX 612/475-2429 I Paul Krauss - 2 - August 2, 1990 II Gary G. Warren I TABLE 1 SITE DEVELOPMENT TRIP GENERATION FOR HANUS DEVELOPMENT I CITY OF CHANHASSEN I TRAFFIC VOLUMES GENERATED (1) I PM Peak Hour ADT Volume Land Use Type Size Volume In Out II Hardee's 4,470 s.f. 2,250 77 73 II Car Wash 4,500 s. f. 430 10 10 Auto Service 3, 850 s.f. 750 16 16 II Auto Service Center(2) 14,375 s.f. NA 35 35 Retail I (Auto) (2) 3 ,745 s.f. NA 9 9 I Retail II (Auto) (2) 3 ,870 s.f. NA 10 10 Totals 157 153 ' II (1) Trip generation rates were average rates by land use type from the 1987 Institute of Transportation Engineers' "Trip II Generation" Report, 4th Edition. (2) There is a lack of available data on Auto Service Center Malls. However, because the trip generation for Auto II Service Center Malls is believed to be similar or somewhat lower than general retail, and because these buildings could be converted into General Retail type land uses in the II future, General Retail trip generation rates were used for the Auto Service Center Mall buildings. I I II I ,- . W I W ,- w.Alk \ ` \_ W O IIIII o _ _ H ' \` \ 04 —Q1 Ln \ T T �� U \ P I 1 • LT 1 \ Q IP CC i \`,i 111i �� i44 p LU t. 0 \\ a. Zo Q 0 1 \ \ \` an an P2 '•� ' \ \ MM 't—\ CC W W 1 \.\ `; ` 4 r�� Z \ \ 4a'I 1 1111110 do a W 0 \ \ 5 $ `� I .I Cr I z 1� \�_\ - '.LL1.111,1vi-M._ a 1 ` - : r---'— —o — z \ ; oo , 4 cc LU \ q T T I \ o I I T! ., i Q ® ` u Y I CI) 1 . F a Z I ��� �-, 8 H o 1 \ aka e -11. a Sac�IUIIIIIuD4_ I --T 5 \ , A -1 1 I I H1111111- k ..,. 1 .- A I \ ' 1406 AAR@0 =VII I 8 Iuy z Ko I I ✓✓.i•-.1 `✓i -.- '�/�✓ O �� i v 010 I, 4‘\ ..., ....0".130X �r� .--,•--" �i I'' ✓" — PROFOSED RETAIL tACIL1IY — 440 Ao 64 OR � ' ' -e t C� — r BUILOIK .. q NW a a�II �n _ i_ bf -} rd 1�` __ o aQ . c„, �- - a< 44 64= CO..iii, r i PRDPOSED { ---1 .....01..,.CARVASN 11r !�= Ga,vrw,J I TM 1 �. O .�...d / fnwEf 4 r _d e 61 • /o J 5 l i" 11 T �6a , o�� _;[ ........._ ,. / \ 1 I AMMO I1 0 e . ,- . a ._—.∎"2 (5%) , XX% -TRIP DISTRIBUTION BASED ON 1989 TRAFFIC VOLUMES F �� 1. 11.N. 32/o%, t 12//, (XX%)-TRIP DISTRIBUTION BASED ON 2010 TRAFFIC FORECASTS 0 40 80 o -.1. o SIRIFSTRGAR-ROSCOE-FAUSCH,INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS DIRECTIONAL TRIP DISTRIBUTION FIGURE 2 CITY OF CHANHASSEN HANUS DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY NM I•1111 MI EN UM UM MI NM NM MI MI IIIIN IIIIII IIIIII EN OM MI INII MI I . , or'' �� Wit,, - 4ad 2 f0% CT. .P�\�( �. FOX NO� 5.%.,:.---1- m /} �,.. X _ `.F )........-.1... FOXTAA.. O d:V.•;- A1�•1 7),11 ,...4_o yam -- a3 ,r',.1 CT ?`e V -g Ls._._.__LAKE LUCr R0.44g����PO'' ,,^„ �'44°4 OR. yi ^�"'ll t+� p u �.DR 5lEt4N AN MFSMEST �C��13 1 "' ' ...e,/t. "LI E IE RL8i0N CT.i \` ¢ cm x J���l l (% ':irt----1,-------.----1 NUNTE RS cT._;i , ;111111 �< J `'W� �l9 T. 4 sij__�_- BEACH R0. A•�51\ 11 Y —P�n 1 �J Cu W ci mod? 1li,� ,•,~<'$'.y =Wio �.d\ � �Il �CtR. rW I' I,,� r�tiA-7 PO ��U\�5�., �/ c R. N.,%-'!".---—1 41')1 ' L ris.AGLE I %i J .�^ e • r00D ND1iDR.�L�• task. toot-- is t\\ C ii �M1I J dy p�� c,�,2a. 7y •\g \\1s \v ti-ty1 ^� • > . W ` OI c7SIIbNTSA��., 'IOTA\\t\t\7732. (((( Cie � �W _.1 I n t ! za �, .3001.- 30 s ( 0.0.vE r ICA lA �� v " `~4:1 T1 AG C i�E9�L� .O k" i qTE CT. 4 i NN ('$RqA 7, �4 iW'X','\ 1 101 y ''14'11 4.' t 4' r I` 4 4 0 RS'I''V�,P O,j d�'\ C+ `/, ii S -- i'u 1CDAARR�� f�, y 24 SADDLEBROOK PASS � ./ ems- �L �� p . F-t 2S.CHIPPEMA TR. ! { OR.CDL ,�1 2a BUCKING/MOD cT. �t�►E" U I i 1I f� i I 21.BELMONT LA ' Ja•� 25 '����// o,' i I �^ Dp 26.DERBY R l /fu 10- DC- R'i i.,ritip 51, i pSNOB A�S� f r ��� 29.CANTERBURY CDZ P \✓ —• `�,LJ Z1 � ‘ 0.' W 30.PLALICOSS LA. AN 1� �"' (1 I �• M.Tifn$1 SANTA FE �� �� �� tl Q r-� 3L PIMLICO LA. �'I ��� 11.�1tT�S�iit-. I 32.DAKOTA CIR. § 10.LAREDO LA. 1 nI 3' I CI. <�' ,-+ ' . .. tYtr, sT.' ( u.IR000OIS ST. 1 �il �;i ,I� :.J \ IDI r� O „SANTA FE CDL•W�I L I�VI E+ L1i�ST.I'CF ' fII EM ST. / ,ttfn ST. G COULTER OR. *11 a �r.tMn _'� _e --if-7:.■ E ARBOR TUw r-�� is g 101 W•�� s u1 ���., f�I�- -Il. �aG PICHA DR<<;r SS pP�7 ^� i:✓ \\\ IA //� IIDA KOTA 111 X111_...%.\-,;II I a.,. _ �s'�� )L---1.-,-1 'x%• . /Y ''�'14 y�r�'I ���i �.+'; Q 4..$;,,4%OE t01��a% • �. �k' ``'' '1?, s,I SDI 44,nt, p d ! x •\ X l� �a W �R. er-- a P C I `� `J .c' �/�'EE Cr. 4f 5 W '! I I S ` Rso Mares /AM r5 ii e I P ` d'�j'..t�'�► C' (trill1"/ 101 �jr• ,,,, w , ...„...._. w 49: 1-- R.1'i j4!13 '� "Proposed T.H. 101 A � ss ` ! , 1z Alignment xso ,`, V Iacv• �� �-.. w Existing T.H. 101 �— �`'�N wit( ;:,1: Alignment SRFSTRGAR-ROSCOE-FAUSCH,INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS PROPOSED T.H. 101 ALIGNMENT FIGURE CITY OF CHANHASSEN 3 SS N HANUS DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY - -/.. /J- 00 RETAIL — (Zao) j25 Ai. a 51'' FAC1lITY 0 . * 1 I Z Q •e= pg_ Btl011/6 •roo W W I ( (( 5-- ill 25 _ C— j a1 L .THj C�K V I.Y r V{/V r 1 r..` (360)= 4 --.d J„ 1�� to l [..„,_,......_ fzso ., I 1 • 6 e 1 g e f XX -EXISTING P.M.PEAK HOUR VOLUME 130go1 yl1 6O1 (XX)-FUTURE P.M. PEAK HOUR VOLUME ■ g10 (290) PM PEAK HOUR /0" ----- 240 t TRIPS IN: 160 FEET V 0601 1 240 (290) TRIPS OUT: 155 o 40 80 S 1IF STRCAR-ROSCOE-PAUSCI-I,INC. CONSULTMCENGINEERS SITE TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT FIGURE 4 CITY OF CHANHASSEN HANUS DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY MI I MI Ma MN NM NM MS MI — NM MI — NM NM NW NM MI MN Paul M. Krauss - 7 - Gary G. Warren August 2, 1990 The results of the analysis for both existing and future conditions indicate that during the p.m. peak hour, westbound left-turn movement from the site driveway tto T.H. 101 operates at Level of Service E. length would range from 1 to 5 vehicles The and r the 95th eue percentile queue length would reach 20 vehicles. delay per left turning vehicle would be approximately The average seconds. pproximately 60 The southbound left-turn movement into the site operates at Level of Service C or better in the p.m. peak hour. The average queue length would range from 1 to 3 vehicles with the 95th percentile queue reaching 8 vehicles. The average delay per vehicle would be less than 20 seconds. The stop sign analysis indicates that the for left turns from the driveway is over 2001vehicles aduring the peak hour which is 50 percent greater than what is forecast. The capacity of the stop sign controlled legs is based on the distribution of gaps in the T.H. 101 traffic stream and driver judgment in selecting gaps through which to execute their desired maneuvers. • For both existing and future conditions, the 95th percentile queue length for the southbound left-turn movement into the site would require vehicles to stop on the railroad tracks. This creates a potentially hazardous situation. • We recommend that the driveway into the development be built on the south end of the site (see Figure S--Recommended Driveway Location) . This alternative location would be clear of the railroad tracks and would require only minor modifications to the Hanus Development's site lan. One shortcoming with this alternative location is the driveway's offset location with West 79th Street and the driveway into the Amoco service station. The south location of the driveway will increase the potential number of conflict points between motorists. Since the traffic volumes are expected to drop on Great Plains Boulevard, no major This slight increase in congestion is should be ferable to h expected preferable vehicles backing into the railroad crossingeaving