3 White Oak Subdivision
-
':'
t
)
]
l...
L.
:(
:(
-
~
L.J
-
-
CITY OF
CHANHASSEH
...)
o
Sept. 5,2000
PC DATE:
CC DATE:
Sept. 25, 2000
REVIEW DEADLINE: 10/14/00
STAFF REPORT
PROPOSAL:
Request to subdivide a 3.4 acre parcel into 5 single family lots and two outlots,
White Oak Addition.
LOCATION:
6900 Minnewashta Parkway
APPLICANT:
Coffinan Development Services, Inc.
600 West 78th Street, Suite 250
P. O. Box 231
Chanhassen, MN 55317
(952) 974-7877
Larry & Nancy Wenzel
6900 Minnewashta Parkway
Chanhassen, MN 55317
PRESENT ZONING: RSF, Residential Single Family
2020 LAND USE PLAN: Low Density Residential 1.2 - 4.0 Units per Net Acre
ACREAGE: 3.07 Acres
DENSITY: 1.62 units per acre, gross; 1.81 units per acre, net
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Request for subdivision approval received on August IS, 2000, to create
two lakeshore lots and three non-Iakeshore. Lot areas range nom 16,874 square feet to 33,359 square feet.
One lot shall be accessed nom Minnewashta parkway (the existing house). The existing house on the site
will remain.
Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet.
LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING:
') The City's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed
plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these
standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi judicial decision.
·
'-" ¡ ~'gmeL nr.I:1 I'\!-- tJ¡ =
~ 'I
.9 I..... .~ (~(~bjlr\;j /1/ ..
,~ a:: lea ~s Ur· ...0 III /
¡~\ - \ ~
~ -- ~ /~ ~~~; ~
/ I j:iI: Ln / /
\. , Wlib,-Q!k ðš /
''*''lunE ~, ale .'"
~ -'~~ J ____
a~e \~
I ~G. \~\
....
Kings Road
~
~ .
í:! ~ ,--.../
co Dl1J/J¡;;
a. JJ I "C ,="
-"( £:¡ ~ ~rr
)- ~=-. N a::
'-.... :::::-::.J!t"- -
~oir
~
\
.¡g
~
~ ~
", I /
/J ~
E¡e:
White Oak Addition
September 5, 2000
Page 2
PROPOSAL/SUMMARY
The proposed development consists of a five lot, single-family subdivision. One of the existing
homes on the two parcels will be preserved. The other house will be removed as part of the
development. Access for the home remaining is proposed via Minnewashta Parkway. The balance
of the development will be accessed via White Oak Lane. The applicant is proposing dedication of
the majority of the right-of-way and approximately two-thirds of a cul-de-sac bulb for public right-
of-way. The remainder of the cul-de-sac is shown as part ofa future development of the property to
the north. Sewer and water service would be extended nom White Oak Lane into the development
with connection stubs provided for future development of the property to the north.
The proposed development is located to the north of Roundhouse Park, east of the Oaks of
Minnewashta Development (a single family subdivision), south of a large parcel with future
development potential, and west of Lake Minnewashta. Minnewashta Parkway dissects the
shoreline area nom the remainder of the lots. However, these two outlots will be combined with
the corresponding lots across Minnewashta Parkway, and they shall not be considered as separate
parcels for development purposes. These outlots may not be used as an association beach lot since
they do not meet the minimum requirements for such use.
The neighbors have requested that the City of Chanhassen consider requiring a trail connection
nom White Oak Lane through this development, to the park to the south. After evaluation of this
idea, the Parks Commission rules out the requirement that a trail be located in this area. There is a
sidewalk system along Country Oaks Lane and Kings Road providing access to the park. Had a
sidewalk been incorporated along White Oak Lane, a trail connection may have made sense.
However, without the continuity, the installation of a trail in this location would have limited
benefit.
The site has a high point of approximately 986 in the northwest corner of the property. The
property slopes to the east and southeast with a low point of elevation 966 adjacent to Minnewashta
Parkway. Site topography is conducive to walkout style units. A retaining wall is located adjacent
to the trail on Minnewashta Parkway. The property has trees scattered throughout the site.
Staff is recommending approval of the preliminary plat subject to the conditions of the staff report.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
Chapter 18 Subdivisions
Section 20-611 through 20-616 "RSF" Single-Family Residential District
Section 20-476 through 20-486 Shoreland Management District
White Oak Addition
September 5, 2000
Page 3
BACKGROUND
These properties have been used as single-family home sites for some time. On July 24, 1995, the
Chanhassen City Council approved the final plat for the Oaks of Minnewashta subdivision to the
west of the site. At that time, access to the property was provided for with the extension of White
Oak Lane.
LANDSCAPING/TREE PRESERVATION
The applicant for the White Oak Addition development has submitted tree canopy coverage and
preservation calculations. They are as follows:
Total upland area (including outlots)
Baseline canopy coverage
Minimum canopy coverage allowed
Proposed tree preservation
3.1 ac.
24% or .74 ac.
30% or .93 ac.
20% or .62 ac.
The applicant does not meet minimum canopy coverage allowed, therefore the difference is
multiplied by 1.2 to calculate the required replacement plantings.
Difference in canopy coverage
Multiplier
Total replacement
Total number of trees to be planted
13,504 SF or .31 ac.
1.2
16,205 SF
15 trees
The applicant has not submitted a landscape plan to the city. Staff recommends a landscape plan
be required before final approval of the development is given. Staff also recommends that the 15
trees be distributed to lots I and 3 through 5as follows: Lots 1, 3, 4 - 3 trees required, Lot 5 -
four trees required.
Buffer yard plantings are required along Minnewashta Parkway. Requirements are shown in the
following table.
Re uired
2 overstory trees
3 understory trees
3 shrubs
Pro osed
o overstory trees
o understory trees
o shrubs
ecor mg to city u er yar or mance, t e prOject eve oper IS responSI e or on y 0 0 t e reqUire p antmgs. uttmg property owners
may plant the remaining 25% on their property.
The landscape plan shall incorporate the required buffer yard plantings along Minnewashta
Parkway.
White Oak Addition
September 5, 2000
Page 4
PARKS AND OPEN SPACE
On Tuesday, August 22nd, the Park and Recreation Commission reviewed park and trail issues
relative to White Oak Addition. Park needs for all 5 new lots are met by the existing
Roundhouse Park, with 4 of the 5 lots benefiting from direct access. Minnewashta Parkway is a
designated trail route; however, only 2 of the 5 lots have direct access. The remaining three will
access the trail via local street and sidewalk connectors.
The primary issue of discussion at the meeting was the desire of a local group of neighbors to see
a trail connector constructed between White Oak Lane and Roundhouse Park. An initial review
of the plat led me to believe that such a connector could occur. A closer examination revealed
the opinion that constructing such a trail connector between two of the new homes, or a new and
existing home, would create an unwarranted hardship.
Mr. Kyle Heitkamp, a resident on White Oak, distributed a neighborhood petition requesting that
the trail connection be included in the White Oak plat. A copy is attached.
WETLANDS
There are no wetlands located on-site.
SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLANT (SWMP)
Water Oualitv Fees
Because of the impervious surface associated with this development, the water quality fees for this
proposed development are based on single-family residential development rates with a medium
density use at $800/acre. Based on the proposed developed area of3.07 acres, the water quality
fees associated with this project would be $2,456.
The applicant may be credited for water quality where NURP basins are provided to treat runoff
ITOm the site. This will be determined upon review of the ponding and storm sewer calculations.
Credits may also be applied to the applicant's SWMP fees for oversizing in accordance with the
SWMP. The applicant will not be assessed area included in the Minnewashta Parkway right-of-
way. No credit will be given for temporary pond areas.
Water Ouantitv Fees
The SWMP has established a connection charge for the different land uses based on an average
city-wide rate for the installation of water quantity systems. This cost includes land acquisition,
proposed SWMP culverts, open channels, and storm water ponding areas for runoff storage. Single-
family/low density developments have a connection charge of$I,980 per developable acre.
Therefore the applicant will be responsible for a $6,078.60 fee.
These fees will be due payable to the City at time of final plat recording.
White Oak Addition
September 5, 2000
Page 5
GRADING
The plans propose to grade over 50% of the site for the new house pads and proposed cul~de-sac.
The trees located in the southeasterly portion of the property around the existing homestead will
remain. The proposed grading will prepare the site for walkout-type dwellings on Lots I, 3-5,
Block 1. On Lots 1 and 5, Block 1, drainage swales will be required along the sides of the house
to maintain the neighborhood drainage pattern through the property. An emergency overflow
shall be established over the westerly 10 feet of Lot 5.
DRAINAGE
The property currently sheet drains in a southeasterly fashion except for the northwesterly portion
of the property, which drains toward existing White Oak Lane. No additional storm sewer
improvements are proposed. Staff is concerned that extension of White Oak Lane and future
development of the Headla parcel may generate significant enough impervious surface which
will require storm sewer improvements in White Oak Lane. Therefore, staff is recommending
that the developer prepare a comprehensive storm water management plan for both the Headla
and subject parcel prior to final plat consideration taking into account the subdivision capabilities
of the parcel to the north and installing any storm drainage mitigation measures necessary. In the
interim, staff believes that ponding will occur along the north side of White Oak Lane until the
Headla property develops. . The developer shall investigate and install the necessary drainage
improvements to maintain the runoff from/through the Headla's property. The developer will
also be required to install drain tile behind the curbs in White Oak Lane to convey household
sump pump discharge and address subsurface drainage in the street. No on-site ponding
improvements are required with this proposal. The downstream storm water pond has been
designed and constructed to accommodate this development. Therefore, the developer will be
responsible for storm water management fees in accordance with city ordinance.
UTILITIES
Municipal sewer and water service is available to the site nom White Oak Lane. Sanitary sewer
and water also exist in Minnewashta Parkway. The existing homes on the property are connected
to municipal sewer and water nom Minnewashta Parkway. The plans propose to raze the home
with the extension of White Oak Lane. The sewer and water line to this home will need to be
disconnected in accordance with city requirements. Staff is unsure if the home north of the
proposed cul-de-sac, on the Headla property, is connected to city utilities. Pursuant to city
ordinance, homes within 150 feet of municipal sewer line shall be connected to the City's line
within 12 months from when the sewer becomes operational. The applicant is proposing to
extend sewer and water lines along White Oak Lane to service the proposed lots. The existing
home on the Headla parcel will be within 150 feet of the sewer line and, therefore, will be
required to connect to city sewer if it isn't already.
All utility improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the City's Standard
Specifications and Detail Plates. Upon completion of the utility improvements, the utilities will
White Oak Addition
September 5, 2000
Page 6
be turned over to the City for maintenance and ownership. Detailed utility and street
construction plans and specifications in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard
Specifications and Detail Plates will be required in conjunction with final plat consideration.
Construction drawings will need to be submitted to staff at least three weeks prior to final plat
consideration. The construction plans and specifications for the project will be subject to staff
review and City Council approval. The developer will be required to enter into a Development
Contract with the City and provide the necessary financial security to guarantee conditions of
approval. The financial security shall be in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow.
STREETS
The plans propose to extend White Oak Lane in its full width approximately 225 feet and
construct a portion of a permanent cul-de-sac in nont of Lots 3 and 4. The developer is
requesting that the remaining portion of the cul-de-sac be constructed when the property (Headla)
to the north subdivides. Based on the plans, it is unclear if the applicant is dedicating the
necessary 60-foot wide street right-of-way and the entire cul-de-sac right-of-way. If the cui-de
sac right-of-way is dedicated at this time, the existing home will encroach upon the cul-de-sac
right-of-way. Staff recommends that the applicant dedicate to the City, at a minimum, the 60-
foot wide street right-of-way up to the cul-de-sac and a portion of the cul-de-sac with a 60-foot
radius located in the White Oak Addition as shown on the plans with the understanding that the
property owner to the north will be responsible for completing the cul-de-sac improvements and
dedicate the remaining street right-of-way for the cul-de-sac in the future when the property
subdivides. This would include removal of the existing home within the
cul-de-sac right-of-way when the property (Headla) subdivides. Although these conditions
compromise the city subdivision standards somewhat, staff believes it is something the
developer, adjacent property owner (Headla), and City can live with. It will allow for
development of the Wenzel property to occur now with minimizing impact to the Headla
property and yet provide the infrastructure to subdivide the Headla property in the future with
little cost or impact to the White Oak Addition lots. The temporary cul-de-sac gives the residents
along White Oak Lane and city more of a turnaround then currently exists on White Oak Lane.
The new street will provide street access to all of the lots except Lot 2 which will maintain its
current driveway configuration from Minnewashta Parkway.
The existing gravel driveway to the house within the proposed street shall be removed and
restored with vegetation. In addition, the driveway apron to Lot I from Minnewashta Parkway
will need to be removed and restored with B-618 concrete curb and gutter. Lot 2 will maintain
its current configuration/access nom Minnewashta Parkway. City Ordinance 18-57 (I) restricts
access to collector streets. Minnewashta Parkway is listed as a collector street in the City's
Comprehensive Plan. Staff is comfortable with allowing the existing driveway to Lot 2 since
there are good sight lines along Minnewashta Parkway and the house configuration is orientated
towards Minnewashta Parkway.
The preliminary plat does not designate a right-of-way width for Minnewashta Parkway. It also
indicates that Minnewashta Parkway may not be centered upon the easement for the street. It is
White Oak Addition
September 5, 2000
Page 7
staff's recommendation that the applicant dedicate the necessary right-of-way to provide a 60-
foot wide strip of right-of-way centered upon the existing Minnewashta Parkway street
alignment. This may reduce the square footage available to Lots 1 and 2, Block I.
COMPLIANCE TABLE
Lot Area (sa. ft.) Frontal!:e (ft~Y Denth (ft.) Lakeshore (ft.)
Code 15,000 non- 90/100 feet if 125 90
riparian; 20,000 access via a flag
riparian or neck
Lot I 21,709 & 30* 158 NA
Outlot A # 4,971 96 53 106
Lot 2 33,359 142 200 NA
Outlot B [a) 6,966 150 50 143
Lot 3 17,781 90 188 NA
Lot 4 16,874 104 182 NA
lotS 18,964 94 204 NA
ROW 27,533
TOTAL 148,104
& 5,622 square feet of the lot area must be excluded ITom lot area calculations for determination of
minimum lot size. However, the area of the corresponding lake shore outlot must be included in
determining total minimum lot area.
* The nont setback begins at the point at which the lot meets the 100 foot width.
# Outlot A must be combined with Lot I as one property.
@ Outlot B must be combined with Lot 2 as one property.
SUBDIVISION FINDINGS
I. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance;
Findinl!:: The subdivision meets all the requirements of the RSF, Residential Single Family
District and Shoreland Management District subject to the revisions contained in the staff
report.
2. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans
including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan;
Findinl!:: The proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable plans.
3. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils,
vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water
drainage are suitable for the proposed development;
White Oak Addition
September 5, 2000
Page 8
Finding: The proposed site is suitable for development subject to the conditions specified
in this report.
4. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage,
sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this
chapter;
Finding: The proposed subdivision is served by adequate urban infiastructure based on the
revisions recommended by staff.
5. The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage;
Finding: The proposed subdivision will not cause significant environmental damage.
6. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record.
Finding: The proposed subdivision will not conflict with existing easements, but rather will
expand and provide all necessary easements.
7. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the
following exists:
a. Lack of adequate storm water drainage.
b. Lack of adequate roads.
c. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems.
d. Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems.
Finding: The proposed subdivision is provided with adequate urban innastructure based on
the revision to the plat recommended by staff.
PLANNING COMMISSION UPDATE
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 5, 2000, to review the proposed plat.
The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the subdivision subject to
the conditions of the staff report.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the following motion:
"The City Council approves the preliminary plat for Subdivision #2000-9, White Oak Addition,
creating five lots and two outlots, plans prepared by Otto Associates, dated 6/30/00, stamped
received 8/15/00, subject to the following conditions:
White Oak Addition
September 5, 2000
Page 9
1. The two outlots must be combined with the corresponding lots across Minnewashta
Parkway. They shall not be considered as separate parcels for development purposes.
These outlots may not be used as an association beachlot.
2. The fiont yard setback for Lot 1, Block 1, shall be at the point where the lot width is 100
feet.
3. Demolition permits must be obtained nom the Inspections Division before demolishing
any structures on the property.
4. A final grading plan and soil report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before
building permits will be issued.
5. A lO-foot clear space must be maintained around the fire hydrant, i.e., street lamps, trees,
shrubs, bushes, NSP, US West, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that
fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to
Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1.
6. If any trees or shrubs are to be removed, they must be either chipped or hauled off site
due to close proximity of neighboring homes. No burning permits will be issued.
7. Additional premise identification numbers will be required for Lot I. Because it set off
of the cul-de-sac, numbers will not be visible from the edge of White Oak Lane, thereby
requiring additional numbers and/or signage at the driveway entrance. Submit plans to
Chanhassen Fire Marshal and Chanhassen Building Official for review and approval.
Plans for additional address numbers must be submitted prior to any building permits
being issued. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division Policy
#29-1992.
8. Regarding the existing house within the While Oak Lane right-of-way, if the house is to
be removed, please contact Fire Inspector Greg Hayes for the possibility of fire training
prior to demolition.
9. The proposed residential development of 3.07 net developable acres is responsible for a
water quality connection charge of $2,456. If the applicant demonstrates that ponding
provided on site meets the City's water quality goals, all or a portion of this fee may be
waived. The applicant is also responsible for a water quantity fee of $6,078.60. These fees
are payable to the City at the time of final plat recording.
10. Applicant shall submit a landscape plan to the city before final approval of the
development. Included in the plan shall be reforestation and buffer yard plantings.
White Oak Addition
September 5, 2000
Page 10
11. The 15 trees required for reforestation shall be distributed to Lots I and 3 through 5 as
follows: Lots 1,3,4 - 3 trees required, Lot 5 - four trees required. Trees shall be
deciduous and 2 Yo" diameter.
12. The developer shall pay full park and trail fees for the four additional lots pursuant to city
ordinance.
13. If the exporting or importing of earthwork material is required, the developer shall supply
staff with a haul route and traffic control plan for review and approval.
14. The appropriate drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated to the City on the final
plat for all utilities lying outside the right-of-way. The minimum easement width shall be
20 feet wide.
15. The applicant shall dedicate the necessary street right-of-way on the final plat to provide a
60-foot wide strip of right-of-way centered upon the existing Minnewashta Parkway street
alignment, a 60-foot wide street right-of-way for White Oak Lane up to the cul-de-sac,
and the portion of the cul-de-sac with a 60-foot radius located in the White Oak Addition
as shown on the plans dated June 30, 2000 with the understanding that the property owner
to the north will be responsible for completing the cul-de-sac improvements and dedicate
the remaining street right-of-way for the cul-de-sac in the future when the property
subdivides. This would include removal ofthe existing home within the cul-de-sac right-
of-way when the property (Headla) subdivides.
16. The applicant will need to develop a sediment and erosion control plan in accordance
with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook and the Surface Water Management
Plan requirements for new developments. The plan shall be submitted to the City for
review and formal approval in conjunction with final plat submittal.
17. All areas disturbed as a result of construction activities shall be immediately restored with
seed and disc-mulched or wood fiber blanket or sod within two weeks of completion of
each activity in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook.
18. The developer shall construct White Oak Lane in accordance with the City's urban street
standards. All utility and street improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the
latest edition of the City's Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed street and
utility plans and specifications shall be submitted three weeks prior to final plat
consideration for staff review and City Council approval.
19. The applicant shall provide detailed storm sewer calculations for 10-year and 100-year
storm events and provide ponding calculations for storm water quality/quantity ponds in
accordance with the City's Surface Water Management Plan for the City Engineer to
review and approve. The plan review shall account for present and future drainage from
the parcel to the north (Headla) as well. The applicant shall provide detailed pre-
White Oak Addition
September 5, 2000
Page 11
developed and post-developed storm water calculations for 100-year storm events and
normal water level and high water level calculations in existing basins, created basins,
and/or creeks. Individual storm sewer calculations between each catch basin segment
will also be required to determine if sufficient catch basins are being utilized.
20. The applicant shall enter into a Development Contract with the City and provide the
necessary financial security to guarantee compliance with the terms of the development
contract.
21. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits nom the appropriate regulatory agencies,
i.e., Watershed District, Environmental Service Commission, Health Department and,
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
22. The existing gravel driveway to the house on Lot I shall be removed and restored with
vegetation. In addition, the driveway apron to Lot I from Minnewashta Parkway will
need to be removed and restored with B-618 concrete curb and gutter. All lots except Lot
2, Block 1 shall access the internal street system and not Minnewashta Parkway.
23. The developer will also be required to install drain tile behind the curbs in White Oak
Lane to convey household sump pump discharge and address subsurface drainage in the
street.
24. The sewer and water lines to the existing home located within the proposed street will
need to be disconnected in accordance with City requirements.
25. The plans shall provide an emergency overflow swale along the west line of Lot 5."
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Findings of Fact
2. Development Review Application
3. Reduced Copy of Preliminary Plat
4. E-MAIL from Kyle Heitkamp to Nancy dated 8/22/00
5. Letter nom Todd Hoffinan to Resident dated 8/18/00 and Mailing List
6. Neighborhood Trail Connector Petition
7. Public hearing notice and property owners list
8. Planning Commission Minutes of 9/5/00
White Oak Addition
September 5, 2000
Page 12
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND RECOMMENDATION
INRE:
Application of Coffin an Development Services, Inc. and Larry & Nancy Wenzel for a five lot
Subdivision
On September 5, 2000, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly schedule
meeting to consider the application of Coffman Development Services, Inc. for preliminary plat
approval of property. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed
subdivision preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard
testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The property is currently zoned RSF, Single-Family Residential.
2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential- Low Density (1.2 - 4.0
units per net acre).
3. The legal description of the property is attached as exhibit A.
4. The Subdivision Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider seven
possible adverse affects of the proposed subdivision. The seven (7) affects and our
findings regarding them are:
I. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance;
2. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and
regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan;
3. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to
topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation,
susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the
proposed development;
White Oak Addition
September 5, 2000
Page 13
4. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm
drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other
improvements required by this chapter;
5. The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage;
6. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record; and
7. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if
any of the following exists:
a. Lack of adequate storm water drainage.
b. Lack of adequate roads.
c. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems.
d. Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems.
5. The planning report #2000-09, dated September 5, 2000, prepared by Robert
Generous, et al, is incorporated herein.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the
Preliminary Plat.
ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 5th day of September, 2000.
CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION
BY:
Its Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary
g:\plan\bg\white oak addition preliminary.doc
EXHIBIT A
MINNEWASHTA
SuRFACE HEVAnON ON 6-15-00=944.08
NO TE:
BEARINGS SHOWN ARE REA TlVE
TO THE PLA T O¡::- THE OAKS OF
M/NNEWASHTA.
JHWI. = 944.5 ACCOROING TO THE
JNONR.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
That port of Government Lot Six (6), Section Five (5), Township One Hundred Sixteen (1/6)
North, Range Twenty- Three (23) West on the 5th Principal Meridian, described os follows:
Beginning at 0 point on the West Line of said Government Lot Six (6). distant 624.93 feet from
the Southwest Quarter thereof,' thence East 638 feet more 'Qr less to the shore of Lake
Minnewoshta; thence northerly along said shore to 0 point distant 80 feet north of and measured
at right angles .'0 the lost described ,ine; thence west to 0 point on the said W~st Line of
Government Lot Six (6) distant 80 feet from the point of beginning; thence southerly along said ~
West Line 80 feet to the point of beginning. The bearing of the East Line of said Section 6 in t e
above described descriptian is assumed to be Narth 0 degrees 16 minutes 30 seconds West for th
basis of the bearings within the description. Said East Line being a straight line from a stone
monument in the Southeast corner of Section 6 to a stone monument in the Northeast corner of
Section 6. Soid stone monument os of record in the Carver County Courthouse.
That port of Government Lot 6, Section 5. and the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of
Section 6. Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian. descnbed os
follows:
Beginning at 0 point on the East line of said Section 6 distant 624.93 feet from the
Southeast corner thereof,' thence Northerly along the said East line 80 feet; thence North 89
degrees 53 minutes 42 seconds West (bearing not to control) 1307.49 feet more or less to 0 point
on the West line of the said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter distant 695.56 feet
northerly from the Southwest comer thereof; thence southerly along said West line 237.26 feet;
thence South 89 degrees 47 minutes 44 seconds East (bearing not to control) 1306.06 feet more
or less to 0 point on the East line of said Section 6 distant 465.42 feet from the Southeast comer
thereof; thence North 89 degrees 55 minutes 20 seconds East 615 feet more or less to the shore
of Lake Minnewashta; thence northerly along said shore to its point of intersection with 0 line
bearing East from the point of beginning: thence West along the lost described line 0 distance of
638 feet more or less to the point of beginning. The bearing of the East line of said Section 6 in
the above described description is assumed to be North 0 degrees 16 minutes 30 seconds West for
the basis of the bearings within the description. Said East line being a straight line run from a
stone monument in the Southeast corner of Section 6 to a stone monument in the Northeast
comer of Section 6. Said stone monument as of record in the Carver County Courthouse.
Except the plot of OAKS OF MINNEWASHTA.
DOc, ,II. If"".' ^ ""..... ,,__
IPROJECT NO:,
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
. . 690 caUL TER DRIVE
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
(612) 937-1900
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION
REC~itfEn
'JUN Z C 2000
cln ur IJ"AI'iiit\SSEN
APPLICANT: (ldHMA",ÀNe.of>ffêNï .>SZVIÆ$,,J;,PWNER: tA!¡ty tf ¡JANCY tJ€¡J2eL
ADDRESS: bOO W~Ì'. ')gT7f S't'.) SÞITE ZSD ~DD~ESS: 6<;QO ¡f'¡tflNI::-Wf6It7)4 fA(l~r.JA'(
p.o. 80" 2.31. (,H~~"ASSêr-J /of1- ~317 CH,4.,,) I(trS$erJ HrJ 5.>3'3/
, ( ,
TELEPHONE (Daytime) t¡7'1- '8'7 TELEPHONE: '1/'1- 3(,,10
_ Comprehensive Plan Amendment _ Temporary Sales Perm~
- Conditional Use Permit - Vacation of ROW/Easements
- Interim Use Perm~ X Variance 717
c
_ Non-conforming Use Permit - Wetland Alteration Permit
_ Planned Un~ Development" _ Zoning Appeal
_ Rezoning _ Zoning Ordinance Amendment
_ Sign Permits
_ Sign Plan Review -I- Notification Sign I·~
- Site Plan Review' -X.. Escrow for Filing Fees! Attorney Cost""
($50 CUP/SPRNACNARlWAP/Metes
and Bounds. $400 Minor SUB)
.:i... Subdivision" 1t7t:; TOTAL FEE $
þ.-<'-
A list of all property owners within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must be Included with the
application.
Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews.
'Twenty-six full size folded copies ofthe plans must be submitted, Including an 8'12' X 11" reduced copy of
transparency for each plan sheet.
.. Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract
NOTE - When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application.
(Î)
'ROJECT NAME
fJlI ~ d¡4 ¡L .A-):>'þ /17 ~"v
tP90() I'II"h/é::-Wtf?Jf~
/?4tt fL W A I(
_OCATfON
..EGAL DESCRIPTION
·OTALACREAGE 3.07 IICIl-é
. ,': '7,':~\~.~y::~ ,.....,.)~J.~,) \-;:.:~ ',. ......: ~..~,::'{_... .
VETlANDS PRESENT
YES
VN'O~~~
--þ- J.")
,':\:j.'
.' .
. .<.
t\!" 'J. .
c. .
. 1~ ~ ~...'~
"; )~
'RESENT ZONING
J25F
~$F
r",,?- ¡;.>
..,'J
. ,.:·7;::~, :·1.\;.~-:
"'f-
,,"
..,
\......~.. . -.: "'¡
IEQUESTED ZONING
':":~"~:: .,~!"":~
'RESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION
:EQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION
EASON FOR THIS REQUEST W
'I ?t775 ¡::(¡tf ,AlGJ
.?t/~ Þ / II /ÞtZ" ¿/II1/'»
CP,v5TltvC 7?P~.
/ ,A/Tt)
5
c..ClTS
/1
his application must be completed in full and be typewrittèn or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information
ld plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning
epartment to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application.
determination of completeness of the application shall be made within ten business days of application submittal. A written
¡lice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within ten business days of application.
1is is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with
I City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom
e City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either
IPy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make
is application and the fee owner has also signed this application.
Hill keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further
Iderstand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any
Ithorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of
y knowledge.
Ie city hereby notifies the applicant that development review cannot be completed within 60 days due to public hearing
quirements and agency review. Therefore, the city is notifying the applicant that the city requires an automatic 60 day.
tension for development review. Development review shall be completed within 120 days unless additional review
tensions are ved the applicant. . .
;}¿f?i
6hð'/oo
Date
'f-"þ\
.........
,
plication Received on
Fee Paid
Receipt No.
e applicant should contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Friday prior to the meeting.
not contacted, a copy of the report will be mailed to the applicant's address.
~
::2
o
¡::
-
a
>- a
a::u.«
~o~
~ ~
- LU
-J t--
LU _
a:: J:
c... $
t--
«
-J
c...
Il.
~ .
~ !
~ ~
u '
s: !
I
I
! I
. I I;.
!! ,llta
:I 11I21i
,
! :
I --1
I :
I-L _J
- -rl
~ .. !
I .-:
I 1
@!! !!
I, '" š~
',,, II
I' I. "
I·i¡ ~ ii !!
.111 ~ ~ II ..
!I.¡ ~n~ I~II
¡Ih h~~~ I~~~
II" I lit ':i.
! ¡!!¡lii!1 I. ;i!¡I¡lii!!'!!1
1!lììll!!'!1 II 1111:,;¡lliit'll
111'1~1!lt' 'I ¡!II"II, I,' J
'I:i"lil~'ill II !;!I'III;;!~:flI!~
I 5. , '1!IJ I. .'1 I'" 01,.
alll!jifol" I ..1110. 11.1.0.,
i. I. ..1.:,', ',I' I "'11:1 . I
.:HI~!I:IU!~ irIlJ.!I'I,1ì1
d!I'11 I '. It lillll'« 1"1 .
.~III ii,·11 i( ~11'1.llli~I': i
51J~ II .1'1 11 II" 1~1 II f'. ì
I t!JI!~i f·1 I ;lli;i!;I~¡I:il i
li:ill!liliii ii, 'li!(I!]!f:!!lì
:
t! :1
~ Iii
\ ~J iii
"';::;:;';:,...=---
----
----...
-
---
./"
/
/
. --1---
II
--..-
--.,
-ìl
I
I'
[ji}. Î.Ç>I:
II
'I
__J
_.J ...)
o.
"I' - -, ¡ ,> I
I 1'1
';'.. I.L I
iïj'Y r L_ ._..-I_J ':< -' =! I
t1' II rç-···" '~, --'0
~ \', I v/g" ¡ ,,¡ '-¿,~~:' ~ ! I I
r::tJ ) j' Liit - u. ..J ',:;. ¡ ¡II
L!!B ¡: í~· ,ï ¡ "JtJ ì I
f' "I 001 '~'~
___.-J ~ _J -;;--7- I
J b I '~L" 1& iil
, .., I..: I
----------
,
r. I
." I
Ii,. \" '')'ð I~ ~ t
1 (" ~ .
I .' I
I . d
.,. .!- I
I I 'n ~
~ -~---oJ_---ýv_~~
-
8 .
I-
~ ..
>-
~
;:; -
~
¡¡j
0::
Il.
~
~.~
¡::~z
õ"'~
C-c
o(~~
h~
I!:' ~J!!
~~()
,§
13
II ¡III
I !nl
~I
III
II I
G
I
Generous, Bob
Aanenson, Kate
Tuesday, August 22, 2000 1 :24 PM
Generous, Bob
FW: White Oak Addition
'rom:
'ent:
ro:
'>ubject:
~----Original Message----_
~rom: Hoffman, Todd
;ent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 11:34 AM
~o: Aanenson, Kate
lubject: FW: White Oak Addition
-----Original Message--___
~rom: Kyle Heitkamp [mailto:heitkarnp@servicepartners.net]
lent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 10:46 AM
~o: mayw@ci.chanhassen.mn.us
~c: thoffman@ci.chanhassen.mn.us
;ubject: White Oak Addition
11m sure you met many people
fancy,
;ood Morning!
.hrough
)ur neighborhood making introductions.
hat
tay (or since then),
.ane. We had a very
'ontact you with any
I met you one day this spring when you were walking
but I was the person building the deck on White Oak
pleasant discussion and you mentioned that I should
issues regarding Our neighborhood.
'm Sure you are aware that there is a proposed plan for the build out
,f
he White Oak Addition in the Oaks of Minnewashta. First of all, I want
.0
Ie clear that everyone is in favor of the addition and the proposed cuI
Ie
:ac. Our issue is that we would like to see a neighborhood trail
:onnector
o be part of this plan. Currently, there is only access to the park
·rom
.he south and east side of the park. Our neighborhood doesn't have
.ccess
.0 the east, so really our only access is by going all the way around to
.he
:outh. This requires families to access this area by the way of busy
:treets. There is already a group called Project Leadfoot that has
ccknowledged there is a safety issue and has been passing out fliers.
'he
:treets they are concerned with are the same streets (King'S Road and
~ountry Oaks Road) that we have to walk along to get to the park.
1
G)
re feel that we are the "little voice" involved with this issue. We
,sked
he developer about a connector and we were told the he doesn't want it
.nd
.he city doesn't require it. We have a signed petition showing that
little
'oice" wants to be heard. This is where our elected officials can help
.0;
us.
currently, we have contacted 17 of the 22 homes on White Oak Lane. The
remaining five were not home when we tried to contact them. Of the
homes
contacted. all but one has signed the petition. The family that has
decided
not to sign is the house next to where the original trail was proposed.
The
petition is not requesting to put the trail connector next to their
house.
We are proposing that the developer would put the trail connector in the
new
addition. This way the residents will know it is there prior to
purchasing
their house. We also want to make sure this is a benefit for all of the
neighborhoods in our area and not just White Oak Lane.
As I mentioned, I'm taking you up on your offer for me to contact you.
Please give me a call so we can discuss this issue. We are presenting
the
petition to the Chanhassen Park and Recreation Commission this evening.
I
don't have any experience
seemed very interested in
truly appreciate any help
this
because I think we all have to protect our children.
working through these
helping the residents
you could provide us.
types of issues and you
of Chanhassen. I would
I feel strongly about
Thank you for your time!
Kyle Heitkamp
phone # 952.279.5702
Mobile # 612.743.9016
http://www.servicepartners.net/
2
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
:ity Center DeiV/!. PO Box 147
mhassen, Minnesota 55317
Phone 612.9371900
'enera! Fax 612.9315739
ineering Fax 612.9319152
'ie 54fety Fax 612.934.2524
? www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us
August 18, 2000
Dear Resident:
This is a follow-up to my letter regarding the White Oak Addition that you just
received. Initial investigations into a trail connector to the park seemed realistic.
Unfortunately a closer evaluation rules out the opportunity to install a trail at the
location described.
The new lot (Lot 5) being created is only 93 feet in width. The house pad is
anticipated to be 73 feet wide. This leaves 10 feet of space on either side of the
home. This configuration will not accommodate a public trail connector to the
park.
If you have questions or comments, please direct them to the attention of the Park
and Recreation Commission or contact me directly.
Sincerely,
~~
Todd Hoffman
Park and Recreation Director
c: Bob Generous, Senior Planner
TH:v
@
Jty ofCJJd1Jhl1ssm. A ß'owint community with clean lakes, Cfualitv schools, a charmin'l downtown, thrivin'l businesses. and beautifù! tJarks. A (Tr'eat fJll1re f( lit;e. work. and tllav.
Smoot.h Feed Sheets™
Use template for 5160@
CITY OF CHANHASSENC/O SCOTT
BOTCHER
690 CITY CENTER DR
PO BOX 147
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
WILLIAMS DEVELOPMENT INC
102 5TH ST W
SUITE 1
CHASKA, MN 55318
STRATFORD RIDGE
HOMEOWNERS ASNC/O KEITH F
BEDFORD
3961 STRATFORD RDG
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
BOYD D AARESTAD
PO BOX 65
VICTORIA, MN 55386
PHILIPPE A DUFOUR &MARIANNE
P PHILlPPART
6931 COUNTRY AOKS RD
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
SHELDON N & RUTH N TANG
6951 COUNTRY OAKS RD
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
RAYMOND K & TERESA B
NICHOLSON
6971 COUNTRY OAKS RD
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
STEVEN W & BRENDA B
HACHTMAN
6984 COUNTRY OAKS RD
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
THOMAS R & JANE EN K LANO
6991 COUNTRY OAKS RD
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
DONALD F & DEBORAH H NOACK
4004 HALLGREN CT
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
JAMES P & SHELLY A MARTIN
4016 HALLGREN CT
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
DANIEL L & BARBARA
WISNIEWSKI
7656 REGENT AVE N
BROOKLYN PARK, MN 55443
GARY J & PATRICIA L
STAFFANSON
4028 HALLGREN CT
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
MICHAEL R & BARBARA ECKERT
4029 HALLGREN CT
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
RENAE L MULLER
45 HASSAN ST
HUTCHINSON, MN 55350
GEORGE J & LENORE E HANKEY
4051 HALLGREN CT
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
ANNE D HUEMME
4070 HALLGREN LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
ROBERT & JILL C SCHULZ
4075 HALLGREN LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
MARK J BARTl KOSKI &CORRINA A
EBERT
4099 HALLGREN LN
EXCELSIOR. MN 55331
BRYAN H & ERIKA PARENT
8335 KIMBALL DR
EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347
KATHERINE M BERGENTHAL
4111 HALLGREN LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
CHRISTOPHER J CLANTON
&ESTER A CLANTON
4114 HALLGREN LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
MICHAEL A & JODI P PARADIS
4125 HALLGREN LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
JOSEPH L & LISA A COLOMINA
4128 HALLGREN LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
WENDY HASS-HAMMOND,
TRUSTEEDELBERT L HAMMOND,
TRUSTEE
353 WEST HORNBEAM DR
LONGWOOD, FL 32779
JASON G & MIMI E HAHN
4142 HALLGREN LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
MICHAEL G & JENNIFER B DALTON
4153 HALLGREN LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
PATRICK G & MARY E YANTES
4156 HALLGREN LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
WILLIAM F SLOTT &LORNA L
WORM
4167 HALLGREN LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
BARRY & GISELLE MATSUI
4170 HALLGREN LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
-
5mooth Feed Sheets™
Use template for 5160@
ŒGORY A HAHN & JUDITH M
.HN
500 CO RD 6
YMOUTH, MN 55447
JASON G & MIMI E HAHN
4142 HALLGREN LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
DAVID R BARBARA M HEADLA
6870 MINNEWASHTA PKY
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
.NCY H WENZEL
00 MINNEWASHTA PKY
CELS/OR, MN 55331
ALAN D HARRISJACQUELlNE L
HARRIS
4086 RED OAK LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
DANIEL R CARROLLDEBBRA A
CARROLL
4089 RED OAK LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
ANK V & JULIE M ORR
J2 RED OAK LN
CELSIOR, MN 55331
PATRICK J & DARLENE M LANGEN
4107 RED OAK LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
NATHANIEL R
JOSEPHSSTEPHANIE J JOSEPHS
4118 RED OAK LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
HN L & LEANNE D ZELLER
19 RED OAK LN
CELSIOR. MN 55331
JON M & ELIZABETH A HAUSAM
4134 RED OAK LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
BRUCE A & PATRICIA S BONG
4137 RED OAK LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
¡WARD D & ANN MANDERSON
50 RED OAK LN
CELSIOR, MN 55331
SISKA GROUP INC
450 EAST CO RD D
ST PAUL, MN 55117
KEVIN D & ANN M HATLESTAD
4166 RED OAK LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
WARD J & LORI J KLING
39 RED OAK LN
CELSIOR, MN 55331
RICHARD A HIRSTEIN &MARY C
GABRIEL-HIRSTEIN
4182 RED OAK LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
ROBERT A & DEANNA M
BUNKELMAN
4191 RED OAK LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
:HAEL P HANNAFIN
IICHELLE M HANNAFIN
38 RED OAK LN
CELSIOR, MN 55331
WILLIAM J MUNIG
6850 STRATFORD BLVD
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
KEVIN R & SUELL YN TRITZ
3851 STRATFORD RDG
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
HOLD J & ELAINE TAYLOR
31 STRATFORD RDG
CELSIOR. MN 55331
DAVID L & DIANE E LIESER
3881 STRATFORD RDG
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
SCOTT F & ELIZABETH A MICEK
3900 STRATFORD RDG
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
JUG LAS DALE REICHERT
)1 STRATFORD RDG
CELSIOR, MN 55331
STEVEN P NORDLING &SANDRA L
ANDERSON
3920 STRATFORD RDG
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
LARRY S & TERESA M HANSON
3921 STRATFORD RDG
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
,N P & SUSAN M STREIF
~o STRATFORD RDG
CELSIOR, MN 55331
JEFFREY M & JANICE MADAMS
3960 STRATFORD RDG
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
RICHARD T & DIANE L HUNTER
3961 STRATFORD RDG
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
-
Smooth Feed Sheets™
Use template for 5160@
WILLIAM SCOTT MORROW
&CYNTHIA M HOULE
3980 STRATFORD RDG
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
TERRY T & BONNIE J LABA TT
3981 STRATFORD RDG
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
BARTON CRAIG WELLS
4000 STRATFORD RDG
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
TODD L & JANE R BENDER
4001 STRATFORD RDG
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
JAMES R & ANNE M LARSON
6636 PARKWOOD RD
EDINA, MN 55436
RICHARD R & MARY I EVENSON
4001 WHITE OAK LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
THOMAS S & STACIE L HANSON
4020 WHITE OAK LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
KYLE E & EILEEN M HEITKAMP
4021 WHITE OAK LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
SCOTT M & ANN L BIEGANEK
4040 WHITE OAK LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
EDWARD D & ELAINE MARION
4041 WHITE OAK LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
LESLIE A JACKSON
4060 WHITE OAKS LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
RONALD D & AMY BELL DVORAK
4061 WHITE OAK LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
SCOTT A & SARAH A RENN
4080 WHITE OAK LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
DEWEY CARTER
2477 SHADYWOOD RD
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
ROBERT M & ROBIN M PETERS
4100 WHITE OAK LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
ZARIR H & MARY K ERANI
4101 WHITE OAK LN
EXCELSIOR. MN 55331
WAYNE 0 & LORI K V IRENE
4116 WHITE OAK LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
RICHARD W STEIN &MARY E
SWEET·STEIN
4117 WHITE OAK LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
CARL C & CARLOTTA M POSZ
4132 WHITE OAK LN
EXCELSIOR. MN 55331
CHARLES W & ELAINE CHANSON
4133 WHITE OAK LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
JEFFREY J & KRISTIN A LANGE
4148 WHITE OAK LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
CHRISTOPHER J & VALERIE
CARNEY
4149 WHITE OAK LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
DANIEL R & DIANE A
WATTENHOFER
4164 WHITE OAK LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
CRAIG R & BETH A HALLETT
4165 WHITE OAK LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
JON R RAUEN &DAWN M
BRUESEHOFF
7675 CONEFLOWER CRV N
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
JAY & SHEILA K JOHNSTON
4181 WHITE OAK LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
JANET K LOWE
4169 WHITE OAK LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
SCOTT D & SHARON M BURT
4197 WHITE OAK LN
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
-
NEIGHBORHOOD TRAJL CONNECTOR
11ús petition is in referep.ce to letters received by the city of Chanhassen last week
regarding a proposal for a path to be utilized for park access,
We feel there should be alternate access to the park other than by-lGngs-Road; which has
"
high traffic. We feel the access/path should be made apart.ofthe White Oak Addition. It
should not affect any of the existing homes in our neighbÔrhood. The developer could
include this as part ofhis proposa~ possibly betw~n lots 4 and 5. This wa
purchasing the new lots would know where the,å'Í!II-COnnector fore·they
build, "-11",.,·
~
NAME
8/-!'I/®
~,&\\0e.
¿~~
12.~\-.l.
13.-t <,'~
14. .mV'> b(~--
15. ~ ct\Q.-'^A~
'-\.C)~o
Lv..
/~
Lú h i ~ ():JJI- Ln
v:::>~ ~ U0
Lid J ~ cg. ')- /-6Ic
<6 - 2( -cJD
8·2-( - où
p/:..-/ cù
'3, ).1- 61,)
"¡;' - d.. 1 --õV
@
'.
19.
20.
21Þ:1?/
22. ~~ ~
23. ke.:>Le..- ~J<6~
24. cSJ- ~
25-/td4'¡£ é/~
26.;? t: a Cih r/õ Y¡
27~- ~
28.:Jð1lJ {J~
29. ~
30. /'
1-/0:20 wH/7TðI1·/( (.~
'?J~t!Ob
#101 tJ/.ÁOÆ-I--.UAi'L r:0ò
Jf/~2- JJj.¡;ú,ÓJ:;~ 0/2"/ {JT}
'71/7 WÁ,.h d",' ¿p ;/U/oð
LiI&L ~~ ~-ê ð?
t.¡/~Ç- vJh/& 001.. ~ <jj Þ( let
U.Cb~ ~~1'c:...~ ~Ið\)~b
J.-\CúD wh..;t-GWc ~ <6'-'d-l-DÓ
ttot¡{J wi,1.:, OA-~ s - '2.1- oc:;>
t¡ p7 /I~ 4 ;?-dd-- 0=
'-/1/ tf /1 f I (9.r_~_() )..;y 0 - 22-0Ò
I--f IWL ~v1 Cv7 2 -21 ;'o(
~:4ð ~à ~ . ;~~~~
4-0 2. ( W((..m; O~ t..v
8-1...'I..·Ov
:2
o
¡::
-
Q a
>-- a
O::LL<:(
~o~
~ d
::J ~
lLJ _
[ ~
I-
<:(
-J
/I
Q.
:¡¡ .
r: !
:z .
Ü :
s !
----
./ (
I
~
0(
~
Qu
Ow
o~
Q ~~
1.11 0 0
V1c:C)V
'O:t'..,c
a;;~_
0_<-
Qt: UJ III
0... 2:/_
·
'"
·
·
'f. ·
IA_K.;'~4)
~ c
c
(J.\" 0 d
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 5, 2000 AT 7:00 P.M.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
690 CITY CENTER DRIVE
PROPO~ Subdivision of Parcel
Into 5 Single Family Lots
ÔNW .'
f iJ3 !JJ
APPLICANT: Coffman Development
LOCATION: 6900 Mlnnawauta parkwa]
NOTICE: You are Invited to attend a public hearing about a proposal in your area. The applicant,
Coffman Development Services, Inc., is requesting to subdivide a 3.4 acre parcel Into 5 single family
lots and two outIots on property zoned RSF, Residential Single Family and located at 6900 Mlmewashta
Parkway, White Oak Addition.
What Happens at the Meeting: The purpose of this public hearing is to Inform you about the developer's
request and to obtain Input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting. the Chair will lead
the public hearing through the following steps:
1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project.
2. The Developer will present plans on the project.
3. Comments are received from the public.
4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses project.
Questions and Comments: If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during
office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project,
please contact Bob at 937-1900 ext. 141. If you choose to submit written comments. It Is helpful to have onE!
copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. .
Notice of this public hearing has been published In the Chanhassen VIllager on August 24 2000.
»~
t
Smooth Feed Sheets™
liD R BARBARA M HEADLA
) MINNEWASHTA PK
:ELSIOR MN 55331
,CY H WENZEL
) MINNEWASHTA PK
:ELSIOR MN 55331
lYL L & DEBRA A KIRT
IILLST
.NHASSEN MN 55317
IES R & ANNE M LARSON
¡ PARK WOOD RD
'JA MN 55436
)MAS S & STACIE L HANSON
WHITE OAK LN
:ELSIOR MN 55331
TT M & ANN L BIEGANEK
I WHITE OAK LN
:ELSIOR MN 55331
LIE A JACKSON
·1 WHITE OAKS LN
:ELSIOR MN 55331
'D D AAREST AD
TORIA
PO BOX 65
MN 55386
"IPPE A DUFOUR &
UANNE P PHILlPPART
COUNTRY AOKS R
:ELSIOR MN 55331
LDON N & RUTH N TANG
COUNTRY OAKS R
:ELSIOR MN 55331
-
RAYMOND K & TERESA B NICHOLSO
6971 COUNTRY OAKS R
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
THOMAS R & JANEEN K LANO
6991 COUNTRY OAKS R
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
RJCHARD R &.MARY I EVENSON
4001 WHITE OAK LN
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
KYLE E & EILEEN M HEITKAMP
4021 WHITE OAK LN
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
EDWARD D & ELAINE MARION
4041 WHITE OAK LN
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
RONALD D & AMY BELL DVORAK
4061 WHITE OAK LN
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
DEWEY CARTER
2477 SHADYWOOD RD
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
SCOTT A & SARAH A RENN
4080 WHITE OAK LN
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
DANIEL R CARROLL
DEBBRA A CARROLL
4089 RED OAK LN
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
C/O SCOTT BOTCHER
690 CITY CENTER DR . 'PO BQ\[ 147
CHANHASSEN .- MN 55317
--
'-_...~.'"
Use template for 5160@
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
C/O SCOTT BOTC
690 CITY R DR PO BOX 147
CHA ASSEN MN 55317
DANIEL L & BARBARA WISNIEWSKI
7656 REGENT AVE N
BROOKLYN PAR MN 55443
DONALD F & DEBORAH H NOACK
4004 HALLGREN CT
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
JAMES P & SHELLY A MARTIN
4016 HALLGREN CT
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
GARY J & PATRICIA L STAFFANSON
4028 HALLGREN CT
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
RENAE L MULLER
45 HASSAN ST
HUTCHINSON MN 55350
SCOTT F & ELIZABETH A MICEK
3900 STRATFORD RDG
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
STEVEN P NORDLING &
SANDRA L ANDERSON
3920 STRATFORD RDG
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
IV AN P & SUSAN M STREIF
3940 STRATFORD RDG
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
JEFFREY M & JANICE MADAMS
3960 STRATFORD RDG
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
. (j)09tS
Jasel
WILLIAM SCOIT MORROW &
CYNTHIA M HOULE
3980 STRATFORD RDG
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
STRATFORD RIDGE HOMEOWNERS
CIO KEITH F BEDFORD
3961 STRATFORD RDG
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
BARTON CRAIG WELLS
4000 STRATFORD RDG
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
STRATFORD RIDGE HOMEOWNERS
CIO KEITH F BEDFORD
3961 STRATFO
EX~
MN 55331
TODD L & JANE R BENDER
4001 STRATFORD RDG
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
.
TERRY T & BONNIE J LABA TT
3981 STRATFORD RDG
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
RICHARD T & DIANE L HUNTER
3961 STRATFORD RDG
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
WILLIAM J MUNIG
6850 STRATFORD BL YD
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
LARRY S & TERESA M HANSON
3921 STRATFORD RDO
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
DOUGLAS DALE REICHERT
3901 STRATFORD RDG
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
DA YID L & DIANE E LIESER
3881 STRATFORDRDG
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
HAROLD J & ELAINE TAYLOR
3861 STRATFORD RDG
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
s aqel ssaJpPV
@A~5IJ\'d"
Planning Commission Meeting - September 5, 2000
18. The applicant will delete the house foot prints and tree removal information from the
preliminary plat before going to City Council.
All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARING:
REOUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A 3.4 ACRE PARCEL INTO 5 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS AND TWO
OUTLOTS ON PROPERTY ZONED RSF. RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY AND LOCATED
AT 6900 MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY. WHITE OAK ADDITION. COFFMAN
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. INe.
Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item.
Peterson: Questions of Bob.
Sacchet: Yeah Mr. Chair, I have two questions. Just to clarify when this was in front of us last time
there was an issue about a variance for that garage. The way it's drawn now there is sufficient setback?
Generous: Correct.
Sacchet: Okay. And then the second question, one thing that I don't think the current report touches on,
the previous one did but didn't really suggest what's going to happen but there was a well on one of the
lots. Is that something that we would usually address in this context?
Generous: It should be addressed as a part of this, that it be properly abandoned.
Sacchet: Will be abandoned, okay. Good, that's my two questions. Thanks.
Peterson: Any other?
Blackowiak: Mr. Chairman I have a question. On page 6 of the report. The section on streets, about two
thirds of the way down it says although these conditions compromise the city's subdivision standards
somewhat, etc. Can you explain that to me please?
Generous: I'm not sure if the Assistant City Engineer could address that for you.
Hempel: Chairman, Planning Commissioners. There is a stipulation in the subdivision ordinance that
prohibits half street dedication in subdivisions. I asked for a legal opinion on that from the city
attorney's office. The intention of that was to prohibit premature development where the adjacent
parcels in the future would be burdened with constructing an entire city street. Dedicating additional
right-of-way and some future property owner would have to do that. With the idea that some future
property owner envisioned that he's got a street in front of him that he can subdivide off of but yet in fact
it was inadequate street width, right-of-way width and so forth. The plan before you this evening we
required the applicant to dedicate the entire right-of-way up to the cul-de-sac and approximately 2/3 of
the cul-de-sac right-of-way with this proposal. In addition, they're proposing and we're requiring that the
entire street width be built up to the cul-de-sac and then 2/3 of the cul-de-sac be constructed with this
proposal with the understanding in the future when the property to the north, the Headla parcel
subdivides, they would be responsible for dedicating the remaining portion of the cul-de-sac right-of-way
16
®
Planning Commission Meeting - September 5, 2000
and complete construction of a full cul-de-sac. It's our belief that currently out there there's really no
turn around at the end of White Oak Lane. Before something would happen out there it would take both
parcel owners to get together to subdivide and given the time line, that probably just won't happen for a
number of years. This allows for development of the property to the south to develop with a full city
street with the exception of a full cul-de-sac. It does allow future potential subdivision of the property to
the north with full city street in place with minor inconvenience or minor cost to complete the cul-de-sac
to make the properties comply with the subdivision ordinance. So it's true we are maybe compromising a
little bit but it's our interpretation and the city attorney's interpretation that this type of proposal would
be a benefit or is in line with the subdivision intent when it comes to constructing a full city street for
accessing both properties.
Blackowiak: Okay, that leads me to two more questions. Number one, what if the property to the north
doesn't want to subdivide and put a complete cul-de-sac there? And number two, is public works, the
fire department, are they comfortable with having 2/3 of a cul-de-sac to work in?
Hempel: To answer the first question. It is a sufficient turn around right now for typical residential use.
It's not a heavily traveled road. You have less than I believe 15 homes on it. It's not highly traveled. It
does permit tum around for snowplow equipment, fire apparatus would take additional turning
movements to make the turn. Again the amount of households on the street as well as the location of
Minnewashta Parkway for access to the other two lots that abut Minnewashta Parkway, they did riOt have
concern with inferior size or reduced size cul-de-sac. I think I answered both questions.
Blackowiak: Yeah, and so to the north, if they choose not to do that, we're comfortable with that?
Hempel: That's correct.
Blackowiak: Alright, thanks.
Peterson: Other questions of staff? Would the applicant like to make a presentation? If so, please come
forward.
Bill Coffman: Mr. Chairman, members of the commission, my name is Bill Coffman with Coffman
Development. With me tonight I have Larry and Nancy Wenzel, the owner of the property. They've
lived on the property for about 30 years or so and we also have Dave Headla, the property owner to the
nf'rth. And also with me I have Kara Otto with Otto and Associates, our consulting engineer. First off I
would like to thank staff for helping me along in this process and coming up with a design that hopefully
meets the city's needs better than the first application. We're very pleased with this design and I hope
you guys are too. We are in concurrence with staffs conditions for approval. Basically we'd be willing
to answer any questions that you might have.
Peterson: Any questions of the applicant? Thank you. Motion and a second for public hearing please.
Kind moved, Sidney seconded to open the public hearing, The public hearing was opened,
Peterson: This is a public hearing. Anyone wishing to address the commissioners, please come forward.
Sacchet moved, Kind seconded to close the public hearing. The public hearing was closed,
Conrad: Before we do that, Mr. Headla. You're not going to make any comments?
17
Planning Commission Meeting - September 5, 2000
Dave Headla: I fully support the whole...
Conrad: That's what I wanted to hear. Okay.
Dave Headla: I think it's.. .had engineering and the design group working on the problem...
Conrad: Weren't you on the Planning Commission some time ago?
Dave Headla: I was.
Conrad: I thought so Dave.
Peterson: After tonight we may have a few openings. Commissioners, your thoughts on this one.
Conrad: I think it's good. It's sort of a neat solution. I think we stood up to something that didn't make
some sense a couple weeks ago and staff worked it out with the applicant and the Headla's are not forced
to do something before they want to. Maybe I'm naïve but it looks kind of neat.
Peterson: Okay. Any other comments? I'll entertain a motion.
Burton: Mr. Chairman, I'll move that the Planning Commission recommend approval of preliminary plat
for Subdivision #2000-9, White Oak Addition creating five lots and two outlots, plans prepared by Otto
Associates dated June 30, 2000, stamped received 8115/00 subject to conditions I through 25.
Conrad: I'd second that.
Peterson: It's been moved and seconded. Any further discussion?
Burton moved, Conrad seconded that the Planning Commission recommends approval of
preliminary plat for Subdivision #2000-9, White Oak Addition creating five lots and two outlots,
plans prepared by Otto Associates, dated 6/30/00, stamped received 8/15/00, subject to the
following conditions:
I. The two outlots must be combined with the corresponding lots across Minnewashta Parkway.
They shall not be considered as separate parcels for development purposes. These outlots may
not be used as an association beach lot.
2. The front yard setback for Lot I, Block 1 shall be at the point where the lot width is 100 feet.
3. Demolition penn its must be obtained from the Inspections Division before demolishing any
structures on the property.
4. A final grading plan and soil report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building
permits will be issued.
5. A 10 foot clear space must be maintained around the fire hydrant, i.e. street lamps, trees, shrubs,
bushes, NSP, US West, Cable TV, and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants
18
Planning Commission Meeting - September 5, 2000
can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City
Ordinance #9-1.
6. If any trees or shrubs are to be removed, they must be either chipped or hauled off site due to
close proximity of neighboring homes. No burning penn its will be issued.
7. Additional premise identification numbers will be required for Lot I. Because it set off of the
cul-de-sac, numbers will not be visible from the edge of White Oak Lane, thereby requiring
additional numbers and/or signage at the driveway entrance. Submit plans to Chanhassen Fire
Marshal and Chanhassen Building Official for review and approval. Plans for additional address
numbers must be submitted prior to any building pennits being issued. Pursuant to Chanhassen
Fire Department! Fire Prevention Division Policy #29-1992.
8. Regarding the existing house within the White Oak Lane right-of-way, if the house is to be
removed, please contact Fire Inspector Greg Hayes for the possibility of fire training prior to
demolition.
9. The proposed residential development of 3.07 net developable acres is responsible for a water
quality connection charge of $2,456. IF the applicant demonstrates that ponding provided on site
meets the City's water quality goals, all or a portion of this fee may be waived. The applicant is
also responsible for a water quantity fee of $6,078.60. These fees are payable to the City at the
time of final plat recording.
10. Applicant shall submit a landscape plan to the city before final approval of the development.
Included in the plan shall be reforestation and buffer yard plantings.
11. The 15 trees required for reforestation shall be distributed to Lots I and 3 through 5 as follows:
Lots I, 3, 4 - 3 trees required, Lot 5 - 4 trees required. Trees shall be deciduous and 2 Yo inch
diameter.
12. The developer shall pay full park and trail fees for the four additional lots pursuant to city
ordinance.
13. If the exporting or importing of earthwork material is required, the developer shall supply staff
with a haul route and traffic control plan for review and approval.
14. The appropriate drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated to the City on the final plat for
all utilities lying outside the right-of-way. The minimum easement width shall be 20 feet wide.
15. The applicant shall dedicate the necessary street right-of-way on the final plat to provide a 60
foot wide strip of right-of-way centered upon the existing Minnewashta Parkway street
alignment, a 60 foot wide street right-of-way for White Oak Lane up to the cul,de-sac, and the
portion ofthe cul-de-sac with a 60 foot radius located in the White Oak Addition as shown on the
plans dated June 20, 2000 with the understanding that the property owner to the north will be
responsible for completing the cul-de-sac in the future when the property subdivides. This would
include removal of the existing home within the cul-de-sac right-of-way when the property
(Headla) subdivides.
19
Planning Commission Meeting - September 5, 2000
16. The applicant will need to develop a sediment and erosion control plan in accordance with the
City's Best Management Practice Handbook and the Surface Water Management Plan
requirements for new developments. The plan shall be submitted to the City for review and
fonnal approval in conjunction with final plat submittal.
17. All areas disturbed as a result of construction activities shall be immediately restored with seed
and disc-mulched or wood fiber blanket or sod within two weeks of completion of each activity
in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook.
18. The developer shall construct White Oak Lane in accordance with the City's urban street
standards. All utility and street improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the latest
edition of the City's Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed street and utility plans
and specifications shall be submitted three weeks prior to final plat consideration for staff review
and City Council approval.
19. The applicant shall provide detailed stonn sewer calculations for 10 year and 100 year storm
events and provide ponding calculations for storm water quality/quantity ponds in accordance
with the City's Surface Water Management Plan for the City Engineer to review and approve.
The plan review shall account for present and future drainage from the parcel to the north
(Headla) as well. The applicant shall provide detailed pre-developed and post-developed storm
water calculations for 100 year storm events and normal water level and high water level
calculations in existing basins, created basins, and/or creeks. Individual stonn sewer calculations
between each catch basin segment will also be required to detennine if sufficient catch basins are
being utilized.
20. The applicant shall enter into a Development Contract with the City and provide the necessary
financial security to guarantee compliance with the terms of the development contract.
21. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies, i.e.
Watershed District, Environmental Service Commission, Health Department and Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency.
22. The existing gravel driveway to the house on Lot I shall be removed and restored with
vegetation. In addition, the driveway apron to Lot] from Minnewashta Parkway will need to be
removed and restored with B-618 concrete curb and gutter. All lots except Lot 2, Block I shall
access the internal street system and not Minnewashta Parkway.
23. The developer will also be required to install drain tile behind the curbs in White Oak Lane to
convey household sump pump discharge and address subsurface drainage in the street.
24. The sewer and water lines to the existing home located within the proposed street will need to be
disconnected in accordance with City requirements.
25. The plans shall provide an emergence overflow swale along the west line of Lot 5.
All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously.
Peterson: It goes onto council on the 25'h. Goodjob staff and applicant. Thank you.
20