Loading...
6. PW Auxiliary Storage Design Concept and Award of Bids for Foundation 1 _______ 1 , . 4 CITY OF , . , CHANHASSEN 11 . , . , I 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5 now W riff Attalesige IMEMORANDUM WM TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager DO tr.-44 -10C NI IllbinI Id to coronae. FROM: Gary Warren, City Engineer �j&/,� • ' a!I subinftted io ems = I DATE: November 15 , 1989 1 -zo- ' SUBJ: Review Public Works Auxiliary Storage Building Design I Concept and Award of Bids for Foundation Construction Project No. 89-23A IThis item was tabled from the November 6 , 1989 City Council meeting to allow staff to further review the design concepts for this building and to reaffirm the cost estimate projections for II this building. The attached September 21 , 1989 staff report and City Council minutes from September 25 and October 2 are provided to refresh everyone 's memory concerning the cost discussions and anticipated timing for the use of temporary storage and comple- tion of the City ' s building. Concerning the design concept for the new auxiliary building, I I have attached building elevation sheets prepared by EOS Architects. The old Public Works buildings which were demolished were approximately 4800 square feet in area. The building I exterior, which represents approximately 40% of the estimated construction cost, is sealed concrete rock-face block walls painted to match our existing Public Works facilities and con- sistent with the zoning requirements of the business park. ' Questions have been raised as to the cost estimates for this pro- ject. The actual bids received will obviously provide us with the necessary answer concerning this matter. IWe have approached this building as directed by Council to pro- vide a replacement facility, no more-no less. The City obviously I benefits from several standpoints, all of which have been thoroughly discussed during the negotiations for the sale of the old facility. I believe we have basically a "bare-bone" proposal I here in that there is no plumbing or floor slab proposed in construction and no heating, although some basic prudent provi- sions have been provided for in the event that heating would be added in the future. The square footage is almost identical to Ithe old facility. 10 . Don Ashworth November 15 , 1989 Page 2 In an effort to further address the cost concerns , we have requested a contractor to provide us a review of the plans and ballpark a cost estimate for us for the building. I hope to have this available for presentation at Monday night's Council meeting. If the City is to proceed with completion of the auxiliary faci- lity in a reasonable timely fashion in 1990 , it is recommended ' that we proceed with the construction this fall of the foun- dation. Since the estimate for this element is under $15 ,000 , quotations have been solicited from four local contracting firms. Bids are being received on Friday, November 17 and will be pre- sented to the City Council at Monday night 's meeting. The cost estimate is based on the attached Auxiliary Storage Building Phase I plans. The recommendation for award of the foundation contract will be made at Monday night 's meeting after staff has had a chance to review the bids and is satisfied with the low bidder . Attachments ' 1 . September 21, 1989 staff report. 2 . September 25 , 1989 City Council minutes. 3 . October 2, 1989 City Council minutes. 4 . November 2, 1989 staff report with attachments. 5 . Auxiliary building elevations . 6 . Auxiliary Storage Building Phase I Foundation plans . ' c: Jack Anderson, EOS I I I I CITY OF i - r . 1 1 ...._ ,.. .. .t-. . 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 A.:•in by City AdministratOt I srv, .^. II MEMORANDUM '`'' TO: Don Ashworth, City ManagerZ1 .— I ,,r':r1t.d to a, 1.e■•ri I FROM: Todd Gerhardt, Assistant City Manager' ,.:,, ;,� t� ,��;,.,t �e I DATE: September 21, 1989 y-? _ SUBJ: Consideration of Acquisition of Public Works Facility II at the Corner of 82nd Street and Hwy. 41 II The City Council at their August 28, 1989, meeting, directed I staff to proceed with negotiations with Nordic Track in acquiring the public works facility at the corner of 82nd Street and Hwy. I 41. Since this meeting, staff has asked Jack Anderson of EOS I Architecture to provide an estimate for the construction of a 5,000 square foot cold storage facility to be located at the 11 existing public works facility site in the Chanhassen Lakes Business Park. Based on Mr. Anderson' s best estimates for a facility of this size and with similar materials as used on the II existing public works facility, the cost would be in the range of II $136,000 to $150,000. The 82nd Street facility is presently II being used to store snow plow blades, sanding equipment, trucks, etc. Jerry Schlenk, Maintenance Superintendent for the City has 11 requested that if the City Council should sell the buildings, II that it be contingent upon the completion of the new facility before they are to vacate equipment stored in the existing faci- lity at 82nd Street. The advantages of selling the facility would be to centralize the public works storage and functions II into one location. IIThe proposed purchase price for the one acre site is $100,000. II The Pauls, the prospective buyers, have also expressed that they would like to take complete ownership of the property right away II and that the city would be asked to move their equipment out at the time that ownership would take place. I RECOMMENDATION IIStaff recommends that the City Council accept the offer of I $100,000 with the contingency that the city occupy the existing 11 building until the new facility is completed. Staff would also recommend that the additional $36,000 to $50,000 needed to II complete the construction of a new facility and that those monies II come from revenues remaining from the General Fund. Mr. Pauls will also be present at Monday night' s meeting to answer any II questions that the Council may have. 1 I City Council Meeting - September 25, 1989 I If LAND SALE AGREEMENT, SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 41 AND WEST 82ND STREET, GLEN II Todd Gerhardt: Mr. Mayor? Item 9, do you want to take action on that tonight? Mr. Pawls is here and is somewhat anxious to try to... ' Mayor Chmiel: Everyone's picking up and leaving. I think we will adjourn and I'm sorry Mr. Paul. What we will do is... Councilman Johnson: Does he accept staff's position? Councilwoman Dimler: I think we should discuss it. ' Mayor C oriel: Yeah I think that's going to be a discussion so with that we will continue this next Monday at 7:30 here in the Council chambers. Glen Pauls: ...we're starting to grade the lot next to it and we're basically...we're going to start grading on it. Councilman Johnson: We were going to ask that it stay over winter anyway. Glen Pauls: That's our problem... Councilman Workman: Mr. Mayor, we have a possible annexation there I would think from the City of Chaska, etc. and I think it's something that we need to discuss. If not tonight, Monday night. I Mayor Chmiel: Which would mean they remove their offer for that specific parcel? ' Councilman Johnson: Sure. It's a dead issue if we table it. It's a dead issue if we deny it. ' Mayor Cimiel: What's the wishes here? What should we do? Councilman Boyt: Let's discuss it. It got my attention. I Mayor Chmiel: Okay, we will go on with item 9. Consider acquisition of public works facility, corner of 82nd Street and Highway 41. Glen Pauls. You've got the floor right now. IITodd Gerhardt: The City Council at their August 28th meeting directed staff to work with Mr. Pauls in negotiating a purchase price for the existing public I works building on West 82nd Street. At this time we have agreed to the purchase price of $100,000.00 for the property. Mr. Pauls' request for that $100,000.00 for the property is that they take ownership immediately. Staff is making the recommendation that we keep the facility until the new one is constructed and IIMr. Pauls is here to make his request of why he needs that immediately. Glen? Glen Pauls: I'm Glen Pauls with Nordic Track from Chaska. I guess as I showed I in the last meeting, the building we're building is right on the land behind your property. We've been trying to negotiate out a price for sale on the property. We would like we said earlier when we got into this whole deal, we 72 City Q uncil Meeting - September 25, 1989 1 were pretty much led to believe that this was all been taken care of between the two cities and that it was going to go smoothly but it's been a little harder than I thought but I guess what we've been trying to get through here is that we're starting grading. They're going to start cutting same of the underbrush tomorrow and the grading's going to probably start Thursday maybe. Wednesday or Thursday. If we have to grade around that site, that's going to cost a lot moz for us to came back and cut it down later and I guess at that point we'd just " like to grade around it and leave it. Mist build behind it. It really doesn't affect our building. We have to move about 15 parking stalls to another area but it doesn't really bother the other site that Hoch and being that we're a mail order company, we're not really out for appearance. We're not trying to attract, we're not looking for words for the building or anything. We're just out to build a building. We need more space. The main thing is we've got to get going now because we've got a time restraint so we've put in an offer of $100,000.00 for a lot that we feel is only worth about $50,000.00, even with the buildings on it. We've made offers to look into helping maybe move some of your stuff into a mini-storages around here being that there seems to be an extra amount or surplus mini-storage space available. I guess none of that seems to be enough to sway you into selling the property so we'd just like to say that we're basically to withdraw all offers and just go around it and see what happens. Councilwoman Dimler: Well I guess I'll start out. You know we never had the need to sell it in the first place. We would still have to spend between ' $36,000.00 to $50,000.00 for storage of those implements. We're not ready to move out before next spring and you're in a hurry to get going and you want to withdraw your offer. I guess that's what you'll have to do. ' Glen Pauls: I guess the only problem can came up with MMDot requiring us, it's supposed to be downhill. The grade is supposed to be downhill off of TH 41 onto 82nd Street there and it's 13 foot uphill. I don't know what the percent grade is but I guess Chaska's already gone through with, I guess they're pretty much proposed grading that down for you. Doing the work and actually cutting the dirt down. , Councilwoman Dimler: That was all premature. I did bring the question up of annexation with Todd but we've never agreed to anything. ' Glen Pauls: I don't know about annexation. I think they were just going to do it even if you still owned it. I'm not sure how that all went. I wasn't in on that part of it. ' Mayor Chmiel: /hose are the things that we don't know. Councilman Workman: I was having a burger down at Butch's a couple weeks ago and Alderman Dale Diedrick, proprietor of the place and I ended up sitting and talking for a little bit. I spend a lot of time down in Chaska. In fact, right in City Hall and I would like to work something out here. I think we should give it to Chaska. Somehow... Councilwoman Dimler: But they're in a hurry now. ' Councilman Workman: Again, I think these are issues that are looming large for the citizens of our community. I'm not sure Don where we're going to came up ' 73 11 City Council Meeting - September 25, 1989 IIwith the extra cash for building this and I understand the positives. Again, it's a situation, we're in a tough pickle and I appreciate if it's an outstanding offer, we appreciate that. Again, it doesn't hide the fact that I we're going to have to spend sane more money at a time when we're looking at cutting a million out of our budget but somebody's going to have to tell me how : we justify it to the people of Chanhassen that we sold off same sheds that we've Inow got to improve. We're going to improve for the purpose of consolidation. Councilman Johnson: I don't know why anybody's talking about annexation though. II That's in the city limits of Chaska. It's not the City of Chanhassen property. Councilwoman Dimler: Yeah it is. IITodd Gerhardt: It's in the City of Chanhassen. _ Councilwoman Dimler: Once they purchased it, they would want to annex it to Chaska. Councilman Johnson: Well that'd have to be a condition of the sale is that they don't do that. They it remains Chanhassen. IIDon Ashworth: Keep an open mind in that area because if all of this would occur, right now we're doing maintenance on that west side of 82nd or west side ' of 41 and Chaska' doing the east side. We simply go down 300 feet and then that's it. We turn around. It's a dead end run for us. If this property were to be sold to the Pauls, and I think that's the most logical use for the II property. I don't know of anyone other that might cane in and use it but if that were to occur, it would only be logical at that point in time that all of their parcel would be within the City of Chaska and they would take over the entire maintenance and building and everything else associated with 82nd Street. ' I would echo Tom's comments. I hear a statement that we need to do something tonight and I would only hope that the applicant would recognize that at 12:00, good decisions aren't made. If we could have potentially a committee, I might I think, maybe if we could talk between the council but Tam, since you're in the area. I don't know who else on the Council, maybe meet with the Pauls and the City of Chaska or representatives and see if we can come back with something for this next Monday night. IICouncilman Boyt: If I might, I think we ought to sell it. The question is, are we giving up $150,000.00 worth of storage space here or are we not? I would gather that you could make the argument either way but my guess is, given what the property is worth to sane other buyer, we're not giving up $100,000.00 worth of space in all likelihood and it's a chance to get your expansion done Iproperly. That helps the County and school district which is a big part of Chanhassen so I want to see us do it. I think $100,000.00 is a good offer but the dilemma is, what do we do with our equipment? Everything is good except we can't just park that stuff on a field samewhere. Have you got an answer for IIthat? Glen Pauls: Yeah, I've been trying to find same places for you. I don't know, ' there's a couple different things. Mini-storages, I'd have to see what you have but from what I heard, it's just mowers and what not in the wintertime. Councilman Boyt: Is that what we're talking? No big trucks? 74 i City Council Meeting - September 25, 1989 Todd Gerhardt: There are same trucks that are stored out there. One truck in particular Jerry told me. Mowers. A lot of sign equipment. That was the list he gave me. He didn't give me a detailed list but those were part of that and I think we could work something out or find sane alternative storage. Councilman Boyt: Before a proposal tonight that said in principle we had sold the property for $100,000.00 provided the City and Mr. Pauls, or his people, can find a home and sanewhat convenient or at least no more inconvenient home for the equipment that's stored there until next spring. If we can get that done, I think that we ought to sell the property. Mayor Chmiel: I guess I agree to a certain point with that Bill. The only thing that bothers me is the fact that it's still going to cost our city to put in a building of equal size anywhere from $36,000.00 to $50,000.00 more. Councilman Johnson: Putting a lot better building. Mayor Chmiel: We may be having another better building. We may be consolidating everything and having everything closer but nonetheless the dollar expenditure is going to be there. ' Glen Pauls: I've got a copy of this plan that you're proposing to build your building and I think you could build as good a building or a lot better than what you have now for less money than that. I mean they're looking at insulated building right now because you might want to heat it. I don't know if you're storing plows, you obviously don't need to insulate it. Mayor Chmiel: We can't build a building like we have there. Glen Pauls: No, but I mean you can build a concrete building I think for around $100,000.00. I think $150,000.00 you're getting a few extras in there. Mayor Chmiel: I did a couple checkings with a couple contractors and they told me we're in the ballpark from $136,000.00 to $150,000.00. Glen Pauls: For the building on the drawing yes, but what I'm saying is I think there might be sane things you could pull off that. If you're really looking to get, if you're looking to get a minimal building that will go along with your ordinances. Like the floor drains and what not, I don't know if that's really necessary in a building there. ' Todd Gerhardt: Code requires floor drains and it's only practical to have an insulated roof and walls is what the architect recommended. We've got to stay with the same type of architectural style with the cracked off cinder block is the existing public works, just for unity in that area. I don't know, we've talked about this a lot. Metal buildings aren't allowed in the industrial park and you would save minimal dollars taking the insulation out of the walls and out of the roof. The floor drains, again you're talking less than, a total of those two I would think no more than $5,000.00. The insulation and the floor drain. Councilman Boyt: So we want to do a deal, I think and the tion is, , we cover the City's concern for storages • how do 75 t City Council Meeting - September 25, 1989 Councilman Workman: I think it's trying to I've explain to people that I ve got to explain to how Chanhassen got smaller and we're going to pay 50 grand to do it. ' I mean it's just the economics of the whole thing and I've heard nothing but good things about Nordic Track and the whole operation but it's a situation that we're put into that we're being asked to do something at this point that we ' never would have thought of otherwise. Or were thinking. Councilman Johnson: One thing we would be doing is adding to the school district's tax base because right now that is city property. Do we pay property ' taxes on that? We're exempt? Councilwoman Dimler: No, but it's just going to be a parking lot correct? IGlen Pauls: Part of it yeah. ' Councilwoman Dimler: You're not going to get much revenue off of that. Glen Pauls: We have about 300 employees working there right now. We move out II of other building, that's going to bring in another company of another 100,000 square foot here. Councilman Boyt: Are you in the tax increment district down there? IGlen Pauls: Yeah. II Councilman Boyt: So you're really contributing immediately to, except for maybe employees. Councilman Workman: I would be willing to give than that property for free if Iyou would trade us the same size parcel of his and our park. Don Ashworth: We looked at that and they do have sane parcels and they were literally across the street. Glen Pauls: The problem is, the parcel they have over there is that's owned by Nordic Track and the parcel over here we own personally. I guess we can make II sane sort of deal there but I don't know what, would you want a piece to put buildings on there or just a public utility? What would you do with that piece of property? ICouncilman Workman: It still would cost us money. II Mayor Qimiel: We're still out storage and we still have to pay for the cost differences between the two. Councilman Johnson: It's more expensive to build on a vacant lot then attach it Ito an existing building. Councilman Boyt: So where are we going with this? II Don Ashworth: • Basically we have a 30 year old building that basically is depreciated out. You're going to have to consider sane form of replacement sometime in the near future and you've got an offer to help the construction for 76 City Council Meeting - September 25, 1989 1 a new facility that truly has a $100,000.00 value. I think again, maybe if we could meet, I don't care, maybe Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday and maybe come back with same solution that meets all concerns and wrap it up next Monday night. If in the meantime you made a decision that that's it, you can't wait that long, well I guess that's the way it is. Councilwoman Dimler: That's right. We can't be put under that sort of ' pressure. Don Ashworth: If I hear the people, you'd like to work something out if you ' can. Mayor Qmiel: Yeah. If it's at all possible. That's right. I Councilman Workman: Again, I think the issue is also larger. It's unfortunate for the Pauls and what they've been placed in but we need to get together with Chaska because the deal was done before we even saw it with a piece of our property. I hate to be greedy and grabby but that's what I think we need to discuss. Don Ashworth: Can we get 1 or 2 of their council members to sit in on that type ' of meeting? Councilman Workman: Sure. I think Dale was agreeable. Bob Lindahl could probably get up. Councilman Boyt: The way you explain this, we have an offer that's greater than the appraised value of that property and to turn that offer down is chancey. I think we ought to accept the offer. Councilman Johnson: We'll never get $100,000.00 for that again. ' Mayor Qmiel: I agree but we have to get the bottom dollar which is still the replacement. Councilman Workman: Can you give us another week? Glen Pauls: I guess if we can be somewhat assured we can get something worked ' out here, we could hold off a little bit. Like I said, we're going to start grading. ' Mayor C oriel: Why don't we do what Don suggested. That we get a couple council members to meet with him and sit down and cane up with some kind of conclusion. If that's acceptable. ' Councilman Johnson: I move we table item 9 until next Monday night so staff has time to work it out for, especially the winter cold storage needs because we've got to know exactly do we have the ability to store that equipment over the winter and where we're going to store all that equipment over the winter. That to me is the most critical. The $36,000.00 to $50,000.00 is, we're going to have to replace that building sooner or later and this seems to be the best time to do it. 1 77 IICity Council Meeting - September 25, 1989 11 Glen Pauls: I was going to check into the Lake Regional Water building in I� Victoria. I guess Flouroware is going to be moving out of there once their II building is complete. Flouroware's building is pretty near complete. That's about the same type of building you're in right now. IICouncilman Johnson moved, Councilwoman Dimler seconded to table action on the land sale agreement for the southwest corner of Highway 41 and 82nd Street with 11 Glen Pauls. All voted in favor and the motion carried. II Councilman Johnson moved, Councilman Workman seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried. The meeting was adjourned at 12:15 a.m.. Submitted by Don Ashworth City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim I I r I I I 11 r I 78 II C ANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING ' OCTOBER 2, 1989 i Mayor Chmiel called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.. The meeting was opened II with the Pledge to the Flag. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Chnuel, Councilman Boyt, Councilman Workman, • I Councilwanan Dimler and Councilman Johnson STAFF PRESENT: Don Ashworth, Paul Krauss, Dave Hempel, Todd Gerhardt and Jim II Chaffee Ade LAND SALE AGREEMENT, SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 41 AND WEST 82ND STREET, GLEN v4 wtke PAULS. . • - Mayor Chmiel: We were to have some additional discussions this past week. Have , those taken place? Le ICouncilwanan Dimler: Yes. I__Mayor Chniel: Who'd like to update me? Don Ashworth: Tom or Todd or Ursula? I Councilwanan Dialer: I guess I can. I'm surprised. I guess I don't know, this was just handed to me. I don't know what the new proposal is that we met was, I II believe it was Wednesday or was it Thursday in Chaska. Chaska City Hall with Jake Pokorney and at that point Mr. Glen Pauls was there and he indicated to Todd, myself and Tom that the offer had been withdrawn. I Mayor Chniel: The offer has been withdrawn? Councilwanan Dirtier: At that point it was, yes. So whatever is here before us II this evening is new information to us. Councilman Workman: The offer had been withdrawn on Monday night he stated at the Council meeting. II Don Ashworth: He came in late today. Handed me what I gave you. The purchase agreement and said, the Council asked that we submit this as a final offer. II So I don't know what that means. That's all he had said to me. Councilwoman Dimler: After our last meeting it was my understanding that the I offer was withdrawn and there was nothing caning forth and we did not ask for another offer that I recall. Councilman Boyt: Can't we clear this up? Mr. Pauls is standing right here. I Glen Pauls: Glen Pauls, Nordic Track. I guess they asked me at Chaska to put one more offer. I don't know, I forget if we talked about that when you were II • there or after you guys left but they wanted me to basically try to get. I guess Chaska wants it resolved. They would like it resolved I should say and they wanted us to put in one offer being that we are interested. Obviously II we're interested in getting the land but we just weren't interested at that 1 II City Council Meeting - October 2, 1989 price so just to get something done tonight we thought we'd put in one more offer just to see where it goes. ' Councilman Boyt: What is the offer? Glen Pauls: I think you have copies. ' Councilman Boyt: Maybe you could explain it. .. Glen Pauls: It's $60,000.00 offer I guess. ' Councilman Boyt: Why the difference? Glen Pauls: From the $100,000.00? Councilman Boyt: Yes. t y Glen Pauls: Like I explained to the 3 that were, I guess you weren't there, at the meeting. We went over it. We decided the $100,000.00 was way more than we really wanted to pay. I guess I should clarify, the way the $100,000.00 worked ' out was we never actually offered the full $100,000.00. Chaska was offering $15,000.00. We were offering $85,000.00 and they were offering $15,000.00 to make it up so the highest we ever went personally, NordicTrack ever went was ' $85,000.00. Where we're at now is we thought that was way too much. We decided not to. I should say we decided to withdraw the offer last Friday. We had to give you a chance obviously to take it because we had offered it but after that we just decided it wasn't worth that. We are willing to go the $60,000.00 just because of the convenience of the whole operation. It would be kind of a mess in front of there but we've had some discussions about roads and the whole thing but basically this is just kind of a last attempt type deal. Chaska really wanted us to try and resolve it. Councilman Boyt: How much of this $65,000.00 or whatever is money from Chaska? Glen Pauls: The $60,000.00 offer is money, that's completely from us now. That's just what we would offer. I don't know, did Don Ashworth call you Todd ' today? Todd Gerhardt: I talked to Dave Pokorney today and there still would be an additional $15,000.00 added to the $60,000.00 offer. If I could clarify what 1 the $15,000.00 would be for would be for roadway easements for the upgrading of 82nd Street is what Chaska's interest in this property would be. II Councilman Boyt: Before on Monday it seemed to me that you mentioned or a week ago, that this was going to be in a tax increment district? Is that correct? Todd Gerhardt: It's in an economic development district in the Chaska city boundaries. Councilman Boyt: How is that different? IITodd Gerhardt: Economic development? It is a tax increment district. Councilman Johnson: This acreage isn't? 2 11 • MI City Council Meeting - October 2, 1989 Todd Gerhardt: Not ours, no. Glen Pauls: The piece behind it was. Councilman Johnson: The acreage behind is? Councilman Boyt: So if I understand it correctly, then of course our P iece can't be in their tax increment district but because it's not in the tax increment district, then it's really a different kind of financial commitment than the development you're making on your own property. Is that right? If your current property is in a tax increment district, then the money you are spending to improve that is, I assume you have a Housing and Redevelopment Authority that's really handling that expenditure. Isn't that correct? Todd Gerhardt: The roadway improvements, the monies to pay for those roadway improvements would be assessed back against the benefitting properties but those dollars can't be expended outside the district so somehow they would have to put a boundary outside that roadway so they could spend those monies on that roadway. I haven't seen their maps to show where their district boundaries are Bill so I can't... Councilman Boyt: Well wasn't there discussion a week ago that basically Chaska would be looking to annex this piece of property once the City had sold it? Todd Gerhardt: That is a possibility. Councilman Boyt: It would create a bit of a difficulty to have part of a building in Chaska and another part of the building in Chanhassen wouldn't it? Or maybe not. Glen Pauls: The parking lot is the only thing that would be affected by this. It's just a corner of the parking lot that it affects. The only problem would be for us is we would have to pay taxes to two different cities. Todd Gerhardt: This would have it's own Parcel Identification Number. Glen Pauls: I guess from what I heard from Chaska, they didn't really mind that much if you left it in Chanhassen. It didn't really bother them either way. Is that what you got out of it? I guess they never said definitely. 1 Todd Gerhardt: Bill brings up a good concern is that can an economic development district boundary encompass another municipality go into another municipality? Don Ashworth: I think that Chaska would look to trying to annex the property. One of the things I did on this, cost benefit sheet in the back. ' Councilman Johnson: Oh that's yours? Don Ashworth: That's mine. The Mayor shared this document with me that they 11 use at NSP. But I'm gone through same of the property tax implications and I've made the assumption in here that the parcel would go over to Chaska. In either case, whether it stayed in Chanhassen or Chaska, the yearly taxes would be I 3 City Council Meeting - October 2, 1989 $288.00 and that was from the Assessor's Office. The benefits, whether Chaska or Chanhassen, to the County would be an additional $90.00 per year. From the school, $264.00 so we'd see net property tax savings for Chanhassen people of $354.00 but I think the biggest costs are the costs associated with maintaining 82nd Street. If that roadway or if the parcel is in Chaska, Chaska would become responsible for maintenance of that entire roadway. I'm estimating right now that our cost to maintain that half mile is $3,500.00 per year. So all of the its you see on that right hand side or under annual benefits are all reduced costs or gain to the City of Chanhassen through this potential transaction. ' Councilman Boyt: What does a 3 to 4 something or other? Don Ashworth: That represents reduced costs. What I'm saying there is right ' now that facility is used for off season storage and according to Mike and Jerry, we would send 3 to 4 men for 3 days, twice a year, and during that time frame we have 9 trucks so they take sanders off and stored. Plows off and stored. 5 pick-ups. Plows off, stored. Grader_- V-plow removed and stored. ' That work takes about 3 to 4 days. We do that twice a year. Councilman Johnson: You still do that in a different place. Don Ashworth: That's correct but this calculation only takes into account the additional hour that's taking place out there. Councilman Johnson: The additional hour to drive out there? Don Ashworth: The additional time required to go out there. Mayor Chmiel: Drive there and drive back? Don Ashworth: Right. Councilman Boyt: If we take 4 people and we send them down there for 6 days, it costs us $3,000.00? ' Councilman Johnson: For 24 man hours? Don Ashworth: Twice a year. Councilman Johnson: 3 days and you're saying it's only 1 hour extra per man. ' Mayor Chmiel: 3 or 4 men. What do they make per hour? ' Don Ashworth: Okay. Councilman Johnson: I would like a job. If for 24 man hours you spend $3,000.00, I'd put my application in. That's a little over $6,000.00 a week. IICouncilwoman Dirtier: Don, I'll do it. Mayor Chmiel: I think what you did was take the, taking them off the equipment and putting them back on which probably should not have been in there. Don Ashworth: But this was from. 4 1 En City Council Meeting - October 2, 1989 Mayor Chmiel: Whether they would be there or would have it done at pub c li works. Councilman Johnson: If it's 24 man days. Don Ashworth: Actually what I did was I multiplied 4 x 3 x 2 x 16 which would be roughly $12.00 to $14.00 per hour and with overhead, you would have an average of $16.00 per hour. But you're right. That's the total cost regardless of where you do it. Councilman Johnson: I think you want 8 in there also for 8 hours? Don Ashworth: Oh, you've got an 8 in there for 8 hours a day. So you take 4 x 3 x 2 x 8 x 16. Councilman Johnson: That works out to about $384.00. Instead of $3,000.00 it'is $384.00. II Councilman Workman: I don't know if that's the issue here. Councilman Johnson: When we got to the bottom, $9,000.00 isn't that much of a savings. Still trying to figure it out huh? Councilman Boyt: Well the advantage of that is if your costs of the move are , $8,500.00-$8,600.00 and your benefits are $9,000.00, well then that would tell you to make the move. But in fact our benefits are not $9,000.00 apparently so maybe out costs do exceed the benfits. Although same of the benefits might be a little hard to measure. It might be an interesting discussion as to how we got... Councilman Johnson: What's this $2,000.00 down here? Regular maintenance. Maintenance on the building? Don Ashworth: No. Regular maintenance involves, Mike tells me we have a light , boom truck out there we use to replace the lights. Anytime you have like one of the signals is out. He estimates that that's 5 times per month. This one here really should be just the 1 additional hour instead of going from the maintenance building to have to go out to TH 41 and TH 5 so let's try that. 5 x 10 is 50 x 40 is $2,000.00. That number is correct. I still think that other one is higher. I'm still trying to figure out how to do it because you can't take 3 to 4 men, if they're on the same site and doing that work it's a lot different than 3 to 4 men for 3 days where they have to take and go out to a remote site to do that same work. I will admit that there is something wrong with my calculations. Councilman Johnson: You see one thing you could do at this garage is have somebody else be doing. You could drop the truck off so people could go someplace else. All the mechanic, in his spare time does it or something. Mayor Chmiel: 96 hours and 96 hours would make that 192 hours is what you're saying per year. I 5 ------ ----- ------ --- - -- - City Council Meeting - October 2, 1989 Don Ashworth: On that one there? Like I said, I got that from Mike and as we're going through it, I will admit that that should represent the full cost but on the other side, it should be higher because you are doing it at one site i ' so maybe's it, instead of having the 8 hour days, maybe they should be you know, 1 or 2 instead of multiplying them by 8. Mayor C rtiel: You come out pretty close. $3,072.00 is what you come up with. Don Ashworth: Yeah, I think it is and this is at the reduced number of hours. ICouncilman Boyt: What we're back to is, so you are saying that it costs $3,000.00 to go out and take the plows off and put the plows back on those trucks? That's $3,000.00 above and beyond what it would cost us to do it if IIthey were in one central location. Don Ashworth: That still seems high but the Mayor just verified it. IIMayor Ciriiel: I just came up with the same total number that he has here. II Councilman Johnson: But did you say 3 men 8 hours a day? Mayor C hmiel: 3 men 8 hours a day. ' Councilwoman Dimler: Each one of us probably has an opinion on whether that number is ridiculous or right. I Councilman Boyt: It's kind of important. If the benefits outweight the costs, this deal looks attractive in spite of the lower offer. If the benefits don't outweigh the costs... 1 Councilman Johnson: The costs go up with the lower offer though. Councilwoman Dimler: It takes 4 men to go out there and clean that road? IICouncilman Boyt: This is a cost of $130,000.00 over 15 years. That's an $8,600.00 cost. IDon Ashworth: Another factor there is I've used 15 years. You put a cinder building up like that, it's going to last longer. At a minimum you'd have a mortgage for 30 years. ICouncilman Boyt: Can you produce at sane point the information to substantiate that this is still in the City's best financial interest to accept the existing offer that's, what is it, $25,000.00 less than the first offer? Are you saying that economically it's in the City's best interest to accept this offer? II Don Ashworth: I'm not sure as to the motivation in the withdrawal of the offer. I think that we as a group should, if we're going to consider this, that potentially myself, the Mayor be authorized to at least get the offer that was on the table from before back. Councilman Boyt: How are you going to do that? I mean I don't expect you to reveal all your negotiating strategy if you have one but I mean the gentleman was here. He said very clearly this is my offer a week ago. He's now cane back 6 ANL City Council Meeting - October 2, 1989 and said, now this is my offer and it doesn't look the same to me. You can have { my vote if you can get it at $100,000.00. As I said a week ago, this is a deal we ought to make. At $75,000.00 I'm not so sure that that still holds true. Councilwoman Dimler: Do you want sane discussion on it? Mayor Qriiel: Yes, I'd like to open it up for discussion. One of the things L. keep coming back to is looking at these cost benefits comparisons to what we're" costing per square foot. Talking with different contractors, we're looking at about a 5,000 square foot building at $23.00 per square foot and that would provide us with a cinder block building, openers on the door, insulation in that building, foundations with grid on slab. Councilman Johnson: Floor drainage. Mayor Qriiel: And floor drainage and a few lights. Cost on that would just be alone anywhere from $115,000.00 on up. If you take 5,000 square feet times t $23.00 you'll came up with $115,000.00. I Councilwoman Dialer: I have a few comments too. Mayor Qmiel: Not yet. Just a second. at I see it is this is still going to ' cost the City extra dollars. It's going to cost the entirety of the city some more money. My concerns are, what we have there presently is servicing us properly. It would be nice to consolidate to bring it back down to the public works area but I don't think we should have to have the City's people pay for those additional costs. It's just my feelings as I look at it right now. Councilwoman Dimler: I guess I would like to add to that, on this agreement here that's dated 10-2-89 that the buyer wants to have the sale from the Council by 10-6-89 and the equipment has to be, around the building most be removed by 10-10-89. I just think that's really too soon. We don't have anywhere to go with it and again the additional costs in getting a facility. Also, the buyer had indicated at an earlier meeting that if there's any soil contamination, that Chanhassen would be responsible to clean it up and I'd just hate to see us spend the whole $60,000.00 on cleaning it up possibly. Councilman Johnson: Of course if there is any, we're responsible to clean it up anyway. Cbuncilwcznan Dimler: That's true but then you've got to, you don't want to spend the whole $60,000.00. Councilman Johnson: Don? Do we have an underground tank or anything at that place? Fuel? ' Don Ashworth: It was removed several years ago. Councilman Johnson: Was it underground or above ground? Don Ashworth: I know we had an above ground but did we also have an underground? Mayor Qmiel: Was that one diked with the above ground at the time? 7 City Council Meeting - October 2, 1989 Todd Gerhardt: I think that was before. I know there was an underground that was taken out or is still existing. I just know there was one out there. Councilman Johnson: One or the other. Don Ashworth: I'm sure that it was removed. The overhead was the gasoline and `•'•' the underground I think was for heating. Like kerosene fuel oil. Todd Gerhardt: I'd like to, if I could, make one comment that Mr. Pokorney had ' also informed me that Mr. Pauls is intending to access onto West 82nd Street. Their facility with an estimated 100 employees and that would stay a gravel base as the existing West 82nd is right now. If they were to come in and make the improvements on that road, MnDot would require that the buildings be taken out of there. Councilman Johnson: Just for right-of-way access? yy Todd Gerhardt: Easements, right-of-way and just the amount of grading and cutting in that area makes that site almost unaccessible. ' Councilman Workman: They can't really improve that road unless we decide. Do we own both sides of that road? ' Don Ashworth: Yes. We own both sides of that section. That's why are maintenance costs are higher. ' Glen Pauls: Could I add something here? Mayor Chmiel: Yes. Glen Pauls: With that fuel contamination, Dave Pokorney was saying that it's possible from what experience he's had that if we cut out the 14 feet we have to cut there, if we get the lot, that we could possibly take care of all that on site without having to have any additional expenses so you might be able to avoid hauling away contaminated ground. I guess what they do with this ground, from what he was saying, is just spread it on the surface. We're doing enough dirt work there that we could do that right on site. Councilwoman Dialer: Well that sounds real good but we'd have to have assurance of that. IIGlen Pauls: Yeah, possibly. II Councilman Johnson: Is there any reason to believe there's contamination at that site? ' Don Ashworth: In fact, I would say just the opposite. If there would have been anything when they dug up the tanks and what not, we would have had it reported at that point in time. Councilman Johnson: You don't just spread it out and put grass seed on it. You've got to go in and plow it a couple times a year for a while until all the fuels go out of it. It's not like you just... 8 City Council Meeting - October 2, 1989 11 1 Glen Pauls: It's got to be turned? Councilman Johnson: Yeah, it's got to be turned a couple times. You don't just lay it out. Councilwoman Dialer: See and I think they want to have their parking lot there. ' Councilman Johnson: They could put it in the back. Glen Pauls: We could put it in the back part. It would have to be looked into. Councilman Boyt: As I understand it, the building we have there is 30 years old? At least. I thought I read 30 years somewhere. Don Ashworth: 30 years is the number I used for amortizing the new building. I'm sure those buildings were there at the time the merger, township and city. Councilman Boyt: I guess the better question is, what's the life expectancy of those buildings for what we're using than for? When are we going to have to start putting sane money in maintaining those buildings? Seriously. Don Ashworth: That should have been one of the numbers that should have gone in this form. Unfortunately I was unable to get. I passed along to Mike and he was going to try to get it from Jerry and Jerry- didn't get back. I'm sure that each year we have a certain amount of vandalise that occurs out on that site just because people think there's something in there and it's not well secured. - On the other side, I'm sure in repairing that vandalise, we put very little money into it. Go back out, they put a lock back on and hinges and a door and that type of thing. ' Councilman Boyt: In our other public works building, is there room there to build a 5,000 square foot expansion? Don Ashworth: Yes. Councilman Boyt: So we don't have to buy land? What we have to do is provide a ' building. Mayor Chmiel: And we already discussed that last time. 1 Councilman Boyt: Yeah. I guess I'm just getting clear on these. Has anybody investigated whether or not Chaska would store our equipment for us? Councilman Workman: Yes. Cbuncilmman Boyt: What was their answer? ' Councilman Workman: Possibly down in Chaska. Councilman Boyt: So they could very easily, Inman it's ' . ., possible that they would agree to store that equipment for us? Todd Gerhardt: For temporary. , 9 City Council Meeting - October 2, 1989 Councilman Boyt: Right. Until we get our building built. ' Mayor Chmiel: Open storage? Todd Gerhardt: Closed. ICouncilman Boyt: There seems to be some possibility that maybe the offer could be expanded. I'd eventually like to see a motion that this be approved contingent upon whoever the negotiating party is representing the City reaching 1 a better financial agreement with Mr. Pauls and the City of Chaska. However they can work that out between them. Don Ashworth: Ideally from a City standapoint, since they're going to be doing major grading associated with TH 41 and 82nd Street, to have the site graded which means buildings removed at that point in time and the grading done by the City in 1990 allowing us to keep materials on the site through the end of this I year and into 1990 would be the best alternative. As I understand it, that was not a very warmly received suggestion. Correct? I Glen Pauls: We wanted to have the lot graded by, well they are grading now... The idea was to get it graded in the fall so we could get a good compaction... because we've got bad floors in our building right now. We just don't want to 1 get into that again. It's not worth it. Don Ashworth: But I mean this would be a parking area right? IGlen Pauls: That part there yeah. The trouble is, we're...so what's coming off of there is planning to fill other areas. We have to decide now what the grade's going to be. Do we let it go? We have to leave it a little bit lower ' if we don't your lot, you know grade around it. We'd have to go maybe another 6 inches the entire lot higher. We have to kind of come up with a final grade. Either that or leave a big pit somewhere. Then if we don't ever get your lot, II we're stuck with a big pit. So that's why we have to decide now. They were supposed to be grading last week. I don't know they had some problems. Councilman Johnson: They're doing something out there. I drove by this Ievening. Mayor Qrmiel: Any other discussion? ICouncilman Workman: I don't know. I'm a little nervous about this. We met last week for really no reason. Only to find out that, I don't know. I suspect Ithat from the meeting we had last week that even if we had approved what we approved last week, we probably wouldn't have had $100,000.00 either. This purchase agreement here says something about $60,000.00. It doesn't say anything about Chaska's $15,000.00. If I was nervous about selling it at I $100,000.00, I sure am now at $60,000.00. I think I was looking at sane of these costs of driving out there. Those are some hidden costs that I don't know that we're going to be able to recognize too well. I don't know. Mr. Pauls IIstated at his meeting that he wouldn't mind this thing sitting in front of his 4 million dollar project and I think it's going to be pretty close to the front door of it and he didn't mind if his couple hundred employees were using a gravel road and then proceeded to reduce his offer by $25,000.00. I don't know. 10 City Council Meeting - October 2; 1989 1 I think we're going to have a building that's going to be expensive no matter which way you look at it and we're going to have to cane up with an awful lot of money to put one up. I know in these frugal times what the people of Chanhassen are telling me. Possibly increased taxes with school referendums, etc. and everything else holding the line and everything else, I do not feel comfortable. Mayor Chmiel: Jay? , Councilman Johnson: Can I just say ditto? Councilman Boyt: So what you're saying is, if the offer was at $100,000.00, if , it was back to that, that for $15,000.00 you wouldn't want to build a brand new public works building next to our existing one? ' Councilman Workman: If it was back at $100,000.00? Councilman Boyt: I would propose that we make a motion that we accept this offer if it can be negotiated at that rate. Councilwoman Dimler: Then he'd have to cane with another offer and I think he'd have to initiate that. Councilman Boyt: Let me just make the motion that we would accept it if he or he and Chaska came up with that offer? ' Councilman Johnson: In other words, you're counter-offering? Councilwoman Dimler: We would look at it. 1 Councilman Johnson: So you're saying we would accept a counter-offer? , Councilwoman Dimler: But we've already been through that Bill. Mayor Chmiel: The counter-offer of $100,000.00 is what he's basically saying. ' Councilwoman Dimler: We've already been through that. Mayor Chmiel: Okay, but if that motion were to go through, the decision would ' not have to be made at this particular time either. A counter-offer... Councilwoman Dimler: But to make it real clear, we most reject the one that ' he's giving us. Mayor Chmiel: Well that's true. I agree. ' Cbuncilwoman Dimler: And then encourage him to put another offer on the table at $100,000.00. ' Councilman Boyt: Everybody's fighting, well Mr. Pauls anyway and our deal, are fighting time. Mayor Chmiel: We realize that Bill. 11 ' City Council Meeting - October 2, 1989 1 Councilman Boyt: I think if you like an offer of $100,000.00 total, then it would sure same everybody a lot of time if we went ahead and accepted that offer contingent upon the storage of the equipment until we can get our building built but the basic dollar thing is really a chance to turn that piece of property into an opportunity for the City to come up with a better situation overall. But to miss that opportunity. ' Councilman Johnson: Basically what you're saying is to reject the $60,000.00 offer, authorize Don to accept an offer at the rate of $100,000.00? ICouncilman Boyt: That's right. Don Ashworth: If that were to be considered, I would suggest a couple of adds I to that. Those would be, that it would also be contingent on us negotiating with Chaska temporary storage at no cost to the City for 1989 or late 1990. Additionally, if there would be an eventual annexation, that the property could not be in a tax increment district therefore assuring the taxes off of the site would go to the County and school. Councilman Johnson: Could they improve the road without that being in a tax IIincrement district? Don Ashworth: Yes. ' Councilman Boyt: But Don, if we're talking, I don't know exactly how the assessment on this property would work but if it's a parking lot, it's not going Ito be assessed at that tremendous amount of money. Don Ashworth: $30,000.00. I Councilman Boyt: If it would allow the City of Chaska to increase their off or their ability to underwrite this to same extent, it seams like to me that it would be money well spent so I would like to not put other conditions on that if ' we can avoid it other than the one, we certainly have to have someplace inside to store our trucks and plows and such. II Mayor Chmiel: What we should do then is look for a motion to reject the $60,000.00. Councilman Workman: So moved. IICouncilwoman Dimler: Second. II Mayor Chmiel: It's been moved and seconded to reject the $60,000.00 offer for purchase agreement from Nordic Track Incorporation to the City of Chanhassen. Then if we could put it back on the table to make a recommendation or... Councilwoman Dimler: Can we vote on that first and then make a recommendation? Mayor Ctmiel: Yes but before we get into that, I just want to make sure we have it all covered. To then request the initial $100,000.00 offer for that property. Okay, does everyone understand that? Councilwoman Dimler: With the understanding that we can find same more... 12 City Council Meeting - October 2, 1989 Mayor Chniel: Yes, we have to get final approval on this and we have a motion and a second now. Councilman Boyt: So really we're doing this in two parts. The second part is going to be accepting $100,000.00 offer with? Mayor Qmiel: Correct. ' Councilman Workman moved, Councilwoman Dimler seconded to reject the offer of $60,000.00 from Nordic Track for the property located at the southwest corner of TH 41 and 82nd Street. All voted in favor and the motion carried. Councilman Johnson: I move that we authorize Don to negotiate and accept on the behalf of the Council an offer of $100,000.00 for the timing purpose of this t - rather than wait a week. y I Councilman Boyt: And storage. Councilman Johnson: And the condition that Chaska, at no cost to the City of Chanhassen, provide storage until our building is completed in 1990. What other? Don Ashworth: That's it. Mayor Chmiel: Without any additional contingencies? ' Councilman Johnson: Yeah. Councilman Workman: Second. ' Councilman Johnson moved, Councilman Workman seconded to authorize the City Manager to accept an offer of $100,000.00 for the property located in the southwest corner of TH 41 and 82nd Street contingent on the City of Chaska, at no cost to the City of Chanhassen, provide storage until the new public works building is completed in 1990. All voted in favor and the motion carried. AUTHORIZE EXTENSION OF AMENDED CURBSIDE RECYCLING CONTRACT. Paul Krauss: Cn August 14th the Council approved an increase in the household charge for the recycling contract. Approval was granted through October with a 30 day cancellation period incorporated. e're recommending that the City Council act either to extend or cancel the contract as soon as possible so we can attempt to arrange for service until the end of the year if you so wish. We are recarnmending that the Council extend the contract until the end of December. The Recycling Commission is preparing a draft requesting proposals on the contract that's going to be sent out in the very near future that gives some options for the caning year. With that again we are recommending that the contract be extended to the end of the year. 13 City Council Meeting - October 2, 1989 Mayor Chmiel: Through December? Irbre s pecifically, what the legislation that has just been passed. ' Don Ashworth: I don't know if it's signed yet. II Mayor Chmiel: Well it's there. All recycling is to be done and that will be mandatory. II Councilman Boyt: What part of it's mandatory? Mayor Chmiel: The recycling. ICouncilman Johnson: Curbside collection. Mayor Chmiel: Curbside recycling. IICouncilman Johnson: In what 1992 for this city, it will be mandatory? Mayor Chmiel: No, 1991. ICouncilman Boyt: That's controlled by the County or the City? ' Mayor Chmiel: That is controlled by the State mandating those requirements to the County for the County to deal with them or to make sure that the cities do that. I Councilman Johnson: Any town in excess of 5,000 people in the metropolitan area has to have curbside recycling by 1991. IICouncilman Boyt: Handled by the County right? Councilman Johnson: No. Any town must have it. The money goes to the County. IIPaul Krauss: If I could add something too. That the bill also includes a funding source for part of that which is a 6% tax on trash hauling. We called I the County today to see if they had any idea about what kind of revenues that might generate and if so, what we might expect to have out of that. They really didn't have any information to give us but I...that just on household trash alone it probably generates $40,000.00 in Chanhassen. Councilman Boyt: That's not enough. Councilman Workman: Where's that $40,000.00 going to really came from though? Mayor Chmiel: Everybody that's paying their. IIPaul Krauss: It's a 6% tax on trash hauling fee. Councilman Workman: But where are the trash haulers going to get that? 1 Mayor Chmiel: The trash haulers will be charging their clients. You bet. You're the guy. Everybody sitting in this roam that has garbage. 14 AJ 1 t CITY OF -A 1 . 110 1 .)1 -. -:' CHANHASSEN •:. ,.. 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 I , MEMORANDUM 1 Aden fri Chi Mm?nitmliet TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager ���?�' FROM: Gary Warren, City Engineer MOB 1 Rejected__ .... DATE: November 2, 1989 bete" it/z /�_ Date Submitted to Commission 1 SUBJ: Approve Plans and Specifications for Public Works Auxiliary Building Foundation Date Submitted to Cooed Project No. 89-23 rlI V- 1 In light of the City ' s recent sale of the Public Works auxiliary 1 structures located on West 82nd Street at Trunk Highway 41, we are interested in proceeding as rapidly as possible with the construction of the replacement storage facility to be located at the main Public Works complex on Park Road. The proposed 1 building will be a 60-foot by 80-foot cold storage facility with two bays. The total design package is currently being prepared in by EOS Architects. In the interest of time, we are attempting to 1 at least have the foundation work completed this fall such that o the rest of the building can be constructed, weather permitting, over the winter season or , as a minimum, in early spring. 111 2 ` The attached plan sheets represent only the foundation element of the proposed building. Footing excavation will be cone by Public Works personnel. It is therefore recommended that the attached II construction plans be approved by the City Council. It is esti- mated that the construction cost for this foundation will be less than $15 ,000 . Staff will therefore solicit quotes from 1 appropriate local contractors to complete this phase :of the construction. Attachment: Foundation plan sheets. 1 c: Jack Anderson, EOS Architecture II 1 1 II I z ZASTROW—NASSET CON.ST. N 6050 LAKE VIRGINIA DRIVE I C SHOREWOOD, MN 5 i d ! 53�� i�.�.t1', 474-3570 474-1984 - ' 4- c I F 0 S Architects 470 Water Street Excelsior, Nn 557,71 November 14, 1969 IATTN: Jack Anderson RE: Preliminary estimate for the AUXII,LARY STORAGE BUILDING, CHAIdHASSEN; MN. INOTE: This is a preliminary estimatq only, subjent to ; rrhi tPr.tv sparci,fioatione All items include contractors profit, overhead and bonding costs. , I +++++++++4-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++t+++++++ ‘3a--- 84-° PHALEI I 7.d a! s Concrete footir_ s per plan. I =° ar 9 Z o $15,055.00 4 3/ 4 4$ - PHASE. Il I Remove top block at stoops and P� an continue c:oursirig with rock face block at. north, south, and east elevations. Continue coursing with standard block at east IIelevation. Install 6" block wall interior. Install two 5'X5' concreto pads at entry doors. Install bond beams at window heads. $41 ,715.00 I Furnish & install steel joists, deck and overhead door beans and lintels. $15,312.00 II II Furnish and install 5" poly-iso roof insulation mil ,� , C .. FPPE" mechanically :i$yc•niA rc?o f i nc by (Inn lyra=r, 'L`rnixh and install pro p-intoai roof ddipici#y, t sa t• gutter and downspouts. $15,662.00 II j?'urnish & install 2-14'x14' G 1-16'2,14' flush overhead garage doors, 2-metal service doors, & 4-fixked insulated windows with aluminum frames. :112,800.00 II Paint exterior block. $ 3,763.00 Nuchanieal and electrical allowance.nce. 811 ,500.00 IIContingency e 5,000.00 IITOTAF, rSTIEATE ?NAST I S; PHASE II $120,82 7.00 Zastrow-Nasset Construction Inc looks forweard to working with you in the II future on any preliminary or final plans. If there are any questions on this proposal please feel free to ca:,ll me. k, 2� I "niccrciY: a 6>c - eta , ' RECEIVED I Ju Zoetr , ce President I 3 , Zas row-;;asset Construction Inc NOV 1989 I EOS • z >k T�7TA1 PArF _ GiGi .ak I I I I I I I U I I I I I U I I I I I I PROPOSED CONTRACT DOCUMENT: As described in the Project Manual and Drawings dated November 10, 1989, prepared by (Hereinafter referred to as "the Architect" ) : EOS CORPORATION ' 470 Water Street Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 (612 ) 474 - 3291 BID TO (Hereinafter referred to as "the Owner" ) : ' CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 Coulter Drive Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 A. BID OFFER: ' Having examined the place of the Work and all matters referred to in the Instructions to Bidders and the proposed Contract Documents prepared by the Architect for this Contract for the Project, we, the undersigned, hereby offer to enter into a Contract to perform the Work for the sum of: ' BASE BID: ' Thirteen Thousand Fifty Five Dollars . (Written amount) ' $ 13,055.00 (Numerical amount) B. ALTERNATES ' Bidder agrees to modify the Contract by additions or deletions for the Alternates stated below and as described in Section 01019 - Contract Considerations . Indicate if the amount is an "add" , a ' "deduct" , or "no change" from the Base Bid amount. Alternate No. 1: Delete perimeter rigid (board) insulation. Eight Hundred Forty Dollars ($ 840.00 ) . CHANHASSEN PUBLIC WORKS AUXILIARY STORAGE BUILDING PHASE - 1 ' CHANHASSEN MINNESOTA BID FORM 00300 2 DOCUMENT '00300 1 BID FORM BID FROM (Hereinafter referred to as "the Bidder" ) : Legal Name: WACHHOLZ MASONRY, INC. Legal Address : 10465 Elm Creek Road Waconia, Minn 55387 1 1 Telephone Number: (612) 442-2220 PROPOSED PROJECTS (He'reinafter referred to as "the Project" ) : CHANHASSEN PUBLIC WORKS AUXILIARY STORAGE BUILDING PHASE - 1 1591 Park Road Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 CONTRACT FOR (Hereinafter referred to as "the Contract" ) : GENERAL CONSTRUCTION Division 3, 4, 7 ' 1 1 CHANHASSEN PUBLIC WORKS AUXILIARY STORAGE BUILDING PHASE - 1 CHANHASSEN MINNESOTA BID FORM 00300 1