I-2. Arbor CoveCITY OF
CHANNASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard
PC Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Administration
Phone: 952.227.1100
Fax: 952.227.1110
Building Inspections
Phone: 952.227.1180
Fax: 952.227.1190
Engineering
Phone: 952.227.1160
Fax: 952.2271170
Finance
Phone: 952.227.1140
Fax: 952.2271110
Park & Recreation
Phone: 952.227.1120
Fax: 952.227.1110
Recreation Center
2310 Coulter Boulevard
Phone: 952.227.1400
Fax: 952.227.1404
Planning &
Natural Resources
Phone: 952.227.1130
Fax: 952.227.1110
Public Works
7901 Park Place
Phone: 952.227.1300
Fax: 952.227.1310
Senior Center
Phone: 952.227.1125
Fax: 952.227.1110
MEMORANDUM
TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager
FROM: Bob Generous, Senior Planner
DATE: April 28, 2014 OA-r-,
SUBJ: Arbor Cove — Planning Case 2014 -06
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Amendment, Rezoning and
Preliminary Plat Review
PROPOSED MOTION
"The Chanhassen City Council approves a Comprehensive Plan Land Use
Map Amendment of 3.26 acres from Public/Semi- Public to Residential Low
Density; Rezoning of 3.26 acres from Office histitutional District (OI) to Single
Family Residential District (RSF); and Preliminary Plat Review of 56.67 acres
into 5 lots subject to the conditions of the staff report and adopts the Findings of
Fact."
City Council approval requires a majority vote of City Council.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The applicant is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment of 3.26 acres
from Public /Semi- Public to Residential Low Density for that portion of the site to be
developed with four single - family homes; Rezoning of 3.26 acres from Office
histitutional District (OI) to Single Family Residential District (RSF) to permit the
construction of the four single - family homes, and Preliminary Plat Review of 56.67
acres creating five lots, four for single - family homes and one for the Westwood
Community Church campus.
PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY
The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on April 15, 2014 to review the
proposal. The Planning Commission voted five for and none against a motion
recommending approval of the development subject to conditions of the Planning
Commission report. The Planning Commission directed staff to resolve the easement
area prior to City Council.
A neighbor across the street wanted to push the houses further back on the property in
Web Site order to preserve trees in the front yards. The developer pointed out that they need to
www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us remove and replace the existing utilities within the front yards; therefore, the trees
cannot be preserved.
Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing forToday and Planning for Tomorrow
Todd Gerhardt
Arbor Cove — Planning Case 2014 -06
April 28, 2014
Page 2
Planning Commission minutes of April 15, 2014 are an item in the City Council consent agenda
packet for April 28, 2014.
Staff and the applicant have discussed the tree preservation area and determined that the following
area will be acceptable and provides sufficient area for the home sites, creates acceptable yards and
preserves sufficient treed areas to warrant surface water credit:
Lot 1 — follow the grading limits
Lots 2 and 3 — rear 85'
Lot 4 — rear 75'
The Natural Resources condition 4 has been modified to incorporate this change as follows:
4. A tree conservation easement shall be recorded east of the grading limits on Lot 1, over the
rear 85 feet of Lots 2 through 3 4 and over the rear 75 feet of Lot 4. The applicant shall
supply a legal description for the easement.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approving Arbor Cove subject to the modified conditions of the Planning
Commission report.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Planning Commission Staff Report Dated April 15, 2014.
2. Tree Conservation Easement Schematic.
3. Resolution.
g: \plan\2014 planning cases\2014 -06 arbor cove\resubmittal 03 -14- 2014 \executive summary.doc
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
PROPOSED MOTION:
PC DATE: April 15, 2014 —�
CC DATE: April 28, 2014
REVIEW DEADLINE: May 13, 2014
CASE #: 2014 -06
BY: SB, RG, TJ, ML, JM, JS
The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve a Comprehensive
Plan Land Use Map Amendment of 3.26 acres from Public /Semi - Public to Residential Low
Density; Rezoning of 3.26 acres from Office Institutional District (OI) to Single Family Residential
District (RSF); and Preliminary Plat Review of 56.67 acres into 5 lots subject to the conditions of
approval, and
Adopt the Findings of Fact and Recommendation.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The developer is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Land Use
Map Amendment of 3.26 acres from Public /Semi - Public to Residential Low Density; Rezoning of
3.26 acres from Office Institutional District (OI) to Single Family Residential District (RSF); and
Preliminary Plat Review of 56.67 acres into 5 lots. ARBOR COVE
LOCATION: 3121 Westwood Drive
APPLICANT: Dogwood Road, LLC Westwood Church
5605 Zumbra Drive 3121 Westwood Dr.
Excelsior, MN 55331 Excelsior, MN 55331
Todd .simningakroissdevelonment.com
612 -590 -8099
PRESENT ZONING:
2020 LAND USE PLAN:
ACREAGE: 56.67 acres
gross and net
Office Institutional District, OI
Public /Semi - Public
DENSITY: 1.23 units per acre
LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION - MAKING:
The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving rezonings because the City is
acting in its legislative or policy - making capacity. A rezoning must be consistent with the City's
Comprehensive Plan.
The City's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the
proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning
Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. This is a
quasi-judicial decision.
Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet.
Planning Commission
Arbor Cove — Planning Case 2014 -05
April 15, 2014
Page 2 of 17
PROPOSAL /SUMMARY
The applicant is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment of 3.26 acres from
Public /Semi - Public to Residential Low Density for that portion of the site to be developed with four
single - family homes; Rezoning of 3.26 acres from Office Institutional District (OI) to Single
Family Residential District (RSF), and Preliminary Plat Review of 56.67 acres creating 5 lots,
four for single - family homes and one for the church site.
The property included for the residential development is heavily wooded with 97 percent canopy
coverage. The site slopes from a high point of 1018 in the southeast corner of site to a low of
984 in the northwest corner of the site. Each lot has a sharp drop off from the property line to the
street of six to eight feet in less than 20 feet. A drainage way from the lot to the east and the
southeast cuts diagonally across proposed Lot 1, which will need to be maintained as part of the
future development.
Staff is recommending approval of the proposed project subject to the conditions of the staff
report.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
Chapter 18, Subdivisions
Chapter 20, Article II, Division 2, Amendments
Chapter 20, Article VII, Shoreland Management District
Chapter 20, Article XII, "RSF" Single - Family Residential District
Chapter 20, Article 3M, "OI" Office and Institutional District
On March 23, 2009, the Chanhassen City Council approved Planning Case #09 -03:
• Conditional Use Permit to permit two buildings on one parcel; and
• Site Plan Permit for a 51,000 square -foot, two -story multi- purpose building.
On July 12, 2004, the Chanhassen City Council approved Planning Case #04 -20 Site Plan Review
for a 166 -space parking lot expansion, extension of temporary drive and extension of West 780,
Street, and a Wetland Alteration Permit to alter and fill wetlands on site.
On September 27, 2001, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following:
Land use amendment from Residential — Low Density to Public /Semi - Public.
Rezoning of the property from Rural Residential, RR, to Office and Institutional, OI.
Site Plan #2001 -10, plans prepared by Hammel, Green and Abrahamson, Inc., dated July 6,
2001, with a one -story variance from the Office and Institutional district regulations to
permit a three story building and a 2.5 -foot variance from the 40 -foot building height
Highway Corridor District regulations to permit a 42.5 -foot building
Planning Commission
Arbor Cove — Planning Case 2014 -05
April 15, 2014
Page 3 of 17
• Wetland Alteration Permit to alter and fill 34,900 square feet (0.8 acres) of wetlands.
However, only part of the wetland alteration occurred for the extension of the sewer and
construction of the storm water pond.
LAND USE AMENDMENT
The City submitted the proposed land use amendment for jurisdictional review on February 5,
2014. The comment period ended on Monday, April 7, 2014. There have been no objections to
the proposed land use amendment.
The developer requires a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to permit the proposed development.
The area being amended is the 3.26 acres proposed for the single - family homes. The requested land
use amendment reduces the amount of Public /Semi- Public land from 1,213 acres to 1,210 acres and
increases the amount of Residential Low Density Land from 4,693 acres to 4,696 acres. The
proposed amendment will make all the land on either side of Dogwood Residential Low Density
uses.
Figure 2 Proposed Land Use
The proposed amendment and rezoning assist in the furtherance of the following land use goals
of the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan:
Planning Commission
Arbor Cove — Planning Case 2014 -05
April 15, 2014
Page 4 of 17
The plan should seek to establish sufficient land to provide a full range of housing
opportunities.
The city will seek opportunities to provide transitions between different uses of different
types.
Development should be phased in accordance with the ability of the city to provide services.
The proposed amendment and rezoning assist in the furtherance of the following housing goals
of the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan:
4.6 Housing Goals and Policies
Goals: Provide housing opportunities for all residents, consistent with the identified community
goals:
• A variety of housing types for all people in all stages of the life cycle.
• A community of well - maintained housing and neighborhoods, including ownership and
rental housing.
• Housing development that respects the natural environment of the community while
striving to accommodate the need for a variety of housing types and costs.
• The availability of a full range of services and facilities for its residents, and the
improvement of access to a linkage between housing and employment.
• Housing development methods such as PUD's, cluster development, and innovative site
plans and building types should be encouraged to help conserve energy and resources for
housing.
• While density is given by a range in the comprehensive plan, the City shall encourage
development at the upper end of the density range.
REZONING
The following zoning districts would be consistent with a Residential Low Density land use:
Single - Family Residential, RSF, Mixed Low Density Residential, R -4, Low and Medium Density
Residential, RLM, and Planned Unit Development — Residential, PUD -R. The RSF district is the
most appropriate zoning district to rezone this property since it is the same zoning as the
surrounding residential properties and permits only single- family homes. While the R-4 district
permits single - family homes, it also permits twin homes which would be inconsistent with the
surrounding development. The RLM district permits single - family homes, as well as twin homes,
townhouses and attached housing. But the RLM district also requires that large areas of upland are
preserved or created as permanent open space to balance the higher hard surface coverage permitted
on the individual lots. Finally, the PUD -R district can be created for a single - family subdivision,
but the ordinance requires that the minimum development size be five acres.
Planning Commission
Arbor Cove — Planning Case 2014 -05
April 15, 2014
Page 5 of 17
Staff is recommending the rezoning to RSF be
approved.
The developer is subdividing the property into five
lots, four lots for single - family homes and one lot
for the church campus. No public improvements
are proposed in conjunction with the development
nor is any street right -of -way being dedicated.
Drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated
over the lots to cover the flow way for water from
the church property as well as standard easements
around the four single- family lots. A tree
conservation easement is being recorded over the
eastern portion of the single - family lots.
GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROISION CONTROL
The existing drainage pattern directs water northwest onto
Dogwood Road. The outflow from a wetland in drainage
area E3 (see Existing Drainage Map) has cut a channel into
the ground which collects and concentrates the stormwater
flow before directing it toward Dogwood Road.
The proposed drainage plan directs much of the stormwater
runoff onto Dogwood Road, similar to the existing
conditions. The proposed design includes a curb cut which
will pull the water back off of the street to the new
/.
CK.' d.NE
E2
1,.96 Ac. E3
6.2 Ac.
EXISTING DRAINAGE
filtration basin on Lot 1. The existing channel will be
j redirected to carry water around the proposed structure on Lot
Z.L 1 and the filtration basin to the northern corner of Lot 1.
The grading plan shows steep slopes on Lots 2 and 4. Grading
must be revised such that no slope is steeper than 3:1.
The topography shown must include elevation contours for
Dogwood Road adjacent to the proposed lots. The centerline
gradients must be labeled.
Grading plans must be revised to show existing and proposed
elevations at each lot corner and the center of the proposed
driveways at the curb line.
Planning Commission
Arbor Cove — Planning Case 2014 -05
April 15, 2014
Page 6 of 17
The developer's engineer must revise plans to include spot elevations and building comer elevations
that direct water flow away from all structures. Grading plan must show spot elevations to illustrate
where water will flow at the back of Lot 3.
The EOF shall be noted with arrows showing the direction of the over -flow. Include a lot benching
detail in the plans.
Drainfile service must be provided for Lots 3 and 4, which have drainage flows from the back to the
front of the lot.
Proposed stockpile areas must be indentified in the plans.
Drainage and Treatment
The stormwater management report was provided as part of the submittal. The applicant's engineer
incorporated several of the design comments from a previous meeting between staff and the
applicant design team.
The applicant is proposing a bioretention - filtration feature to be located on Lot 1. The design for
this feature is following the MN Stormwater Manual which can be found here:
http:// stonnwater .Dea.state.mn.us /index.php ?title =Main Page &oldid =12872
It has been the experience of staff, as well as that of the Carver County SWCD, that proper design
of these features is critical to assure that they do not clog and cease to function over time. The detail
should be amended as follows:
• The proposed amended filtration soil includes native soils — Mix A from MN Storm Water
Manual. No native soils may be used in the filtration soil. Instead Mix B - of 70% washed
sand and 30% leaf -litter compost mixture shall be used.
• Pre - treatment practices to be employed shall be shown on the plan view and in the detail
sheet. This shall be shown at the curb cut. It is highly recommended that something similar
to the Rain Guardian developed by Anoka Conservation District be used. The pretreatment
device must be approved by the City. This is even more important as the routing to the
feature will be through the city curb and gutter.
• It shall also be called out on the grading plans that steps shall be taken to prevent
compaction and siltation of the area resulting from construction activities on the site.
• Filter fabric invariably clogs. Remove the filter fabric from the detail and use a choker
course of rock instead.
• The underdrain shall be smooth walled and have a tracer wire.
• A knife gate valve shall be included prior to the underdrain entering the proposed 27"
manhole. This valve shall be reasonable easy to access.
• Calculations shall be provided demonstrating that the feature will draw down within 48
hours.
• To avoid plant drowning, siltation, minimize soil compaction, increase contact time and
other benefits, the MN Stormwater Manual highly recommends that the maximum depth
Planning Commission
Arbor Cove — Planning Case 2014 -05
April 15, 2014
Page 7of17
shall be no greater than 9.6 inches. This may impose limitations and may not be achievable
however, the current ponding depth of 24 inches is not acceptable. Efforts shall be made to
decrease the depth as close as possible to the 9.6 inches but no greater than the 14.4 inches
recommended for MH HSG B soils.
• Maximum side slopes are 3:1 however, it has been staffs' experience that shallower side
slopes decrease maintenance needs in the long term. Further, this would increase the surface
area of the feature and decrease the ponding depth needed to capture the same volume. Side
slopes shall be no steeper than 5:1 and as close to 10:1 as possible except that edge proximal
to the house may be 3:1.
• Any decrease in treatment volume resulting from the above modifications can be
compensated for through additional tree conservation.
• The feature shall be kept offline until the vegetation has been established. Plans and the
SWPPP must include this information and describe the methodology to be used to achieve
this.
• A detailed planting plan and schedule must be developed and included in plan set for
approval.
• The in -situ soils shall be ripped prior to placing the amended filtration soils.
The site lies within the boundaries of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Chanhassen is the
permitting authority within this district for most rules.
The developer shall be responsible for the construction of the biofiltration feature and shall make
assurances that the plant materials, mulch and side slopes into biofiltration feature are maintained
throughout the life of the feature. This is most typically accomplished though a Homeowners
Association. The city will be responsible for maintenance of the underdrain, outlet pipe and inlet
protection device at the curb. An operations and maintenance manual shall be developed describing
how the feature will be maintained and by who.
Tree preservation is being used to provide volume reduction and water quality benefits. This is an
acceptable practice under the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District rules and guidance and the
Carver County Watershed Management Organization rules and guidance as well as under the
Minimum Impact Design Standards (MIDS) recommendations. The applicant's engineer provided
acceptable calculations for this credit. In order to garner the benefits, the area must be protected in
perpetuity. This area within the conservation easement will not be included into the Surface Water
Management connection fee charges. In the event that the area is not preserved in perpetuity,
SWMP connection fees will be due at the time the easement is vacated.
The following conditions apply to the proposed channel.
Staff would prefer to see added benefits from additional tree preservation. Short of that, the
applicant shall include tree 119 and 129 into the protection plan. These trees will serve to
guard the conveyance channel from erosion at that point where the newly graded channel
will meet the existing channel.
Planning Commission
Arbor Cove — Planning Case 2014 -05
April 15, 2014
Page 8 of 17
The drainage and utility easement shall extend from top of bank to top of bank for the
proposed channel. This is estimated to be at least 20 feet when scaled off the provided
drawings.
The 988 and 986 contours shall be broadened to create a more laminar flow before
discharging onto city right -of -way.
The plan shall maintain a separation of at least two (2) feet between peak flow elevation in
the channel during the 100 -year storm event and the top of bank for that portion behind the
proposed structure on Lot 1.
Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control
The development will result in a disturbance of greater than one (1) acre. The minimum threshold
for requiring a NPDES Construction Permit is the disturbance of 1 acre or more. An NPDES permit
will be required and a standalone Surface Water Pollution Prevention Plan must be developed. The
SWPPP is required with preliminary submittal but must be reviewed and approved prior to any
earth - disturbing activities associated with the project. Proof of permit will also be required to be on-
site prior to any earth - disturbing activities.
The SWPPP must include all elements required by the permit. It has been staff's experience that the
following items are most typically forgotten elements. The MPCA has developed a checklist for
SWPPP review which is available on their website.
• A narrative of construction activity per Part IIIA 1.
• A listing of the chain of responsibility for oversight of SWPPP implementation per Part IIIA
2.
• Training documentation for those involved in the design and implementation of the SWPPP
per Part IIM
• Designs and calculations for meeting Stornwater Discharge Requirements although it is
understood that this project was originally permitted under different rules so design
requirements will be to that approval as administered by Carver County WMO.
• Estimated preliminary quantities tabulation for all erosion prevention and sediment control
BMPs per Part IIIA 5.
• Impervious coverage pre - development and post - development per Part IIIA 5.
• Site map showing soil types per Part IIIA 5.
• A map of surface waters and wetlands within one -mile of site which will receive
stormwater. The SWPPP must identify if these are special or impaired waters. Lake
Hazeltine receives runoff from the site and is listed as a 303D impaired water.
• The SWPPP must indicate who is responsible for the maintenance of the permanent
stormwater management practices on the site and a maintenance plan to assure performance
of the practice as listed in Part IIIA 5 k.
• The plans must show all elements required under part IV.0 of the permit.
The following items shall be incorporated into plan set where appropriate:
Planning Commission
Arbor Cove — Planning Case 2014 -05
April 15, 2014
Page 9 of 17
• The SWPPP as well as the erosion control plan must indicate how the conveyance from the
wetland will be permanently stabilized.
• A detail of the rock checks must be included. This shall be consistent with Technical
Supplement 14C to Part 654 of the National Engineering Handbook.
CONNECTION CHARGES
Surface Water Management connection charges will be due with the final plat. These fees are
estimated as follows.
Area of lots 1 — 4 less conservation easement. 3.26 - 0.80 = 2.46 acres
EASEMENTS
All existing easements shown in the plans must be properly referenced with the document number
or plat they were dedicated under.
A drainage and utility easement crosses the frontage of Lots 2, 3 and 4. The existing drainage and
utility easements are preserved in the proposed plat.
A conservation easement is proposed along the back of Lots 2, 3 and 4 as well as the east corner of
Lot 1.
A new drainage and utility easement over the filtration basin and the channel on Lot 1 will provide
the City access to these stormwater facilities.
RETAINING WALLS
The developer proposes two retaining walls on this site. The grading behind all the retaining walls
must be modified so that water will not drain down the face of the wall.
The developer's engineer must include the elevation of the top and bottom of the retaining walls.
The following retaining wall materials are prohibited: smooth face, poured in place concrete
(stamped or patterned is acceptable), masonry, railroad ties and timber.
Grading must be revised to include a swale at the top of the retaining walls for drainage.
The Lot 3 retaining wall is located near the southwest side of the proposed structure. It is
approximately 65 feet long and three feet tall.
Rate Per Acre
Acre
Sum
Water Quality
$2,830.00
2.46
$6,961.80
Water Quantity
$4,050.00
2.46
$9,963.00
(Credit)
$1,415.00
2.02
($2,858.30)
Total Estimate SWMP Fees Due at Final Plat
$14,066.50
EASEMENTS
All existing easements shown in the plans must be properly referenced with the document number
or plat they were dedicated under.
A drainage and utility easement crosses the frontage of Lots 2, 3 and 4. The existing drainage and
utility easements are preserved in the proposed plat.
A conservation easement is proposed along the back of Lots 2, 3 and 4 as well as the east corner of
Lot 1.
A new drainage and utility easement over the filtration basin and the channel on Lot 1 will provide
the City access to these stormwater facilities.
RETAINING WALLS
The developer proposes two retaining walls on this site. The grading behind all the retaining walls
must be modified so that water will not drain down the face of the wall.
The developer's engineer must include the elevation of the top and bottom of the retaining walls.
The following retaining wall materials are prohibited: smooth face, poured in place concrete
(stamped or patterned is acceptable), masonry, railroad ties and timber.
Grading must be revised to include a swale at the top of the retaining walls for drainage.
The Lot 3 retaining wall is located near the southwest side of the proposed structure. It is
approximately 65 feet long and three feet tall.
Planning Commission
Arbor Cove — Planning Case 2014 -05
April 15, 2014
Page 10 of 17
The Lot 4 retaining wall is located along the southern lot line. It is approximately 55 feet long and
three feet tall. This wall must be relocated outside of the 10 -foot drainage and utility easement.
SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN
Sanitary sewer and watermain were constructed under Dogwood Road as part of City Project #06-
06. In 2008, the water and sewer were completed with four service stubs built adjacent to the
proposed Lots 1 -4. The service stubs will be adequate to provide City water and sanitary sewer
service to the proposed new lots.
ASSESSMENTS
In 2003, the property was assessed $34,492 for Dogwood Road street and utility improvements. As
of January 1, 2014, the outstanding principal was $10,347.75. At the time of the final plat, this
assessment plus additional accrued interest must be paid or reassessed.
Partial water and sewer hookup fees for each lot are due at the time of final plat. The partial hookup
fees will be assessed at the rate in effect at that rime.
WETLANDS AND SHORELAND AREAS
The site lies entirely within the shoreland district for Lake Minnewashta. Lake Minnewashta is a
recreational development lake ( §20 -479). A minimum lot size for non - riparian, single - family lots
within the shoreland district is 15,000 square feet with a minimum width of 90 feet ( §20 -480).
These lots meet or exceed the shoreland requirements.
Two flow - through wetland systems exist on the property immediately east and south of the
proposed subdivision. Because these delineations are more than five years old they are no longer
valid. However, they do provide a sound baseline to establish the probability that wetlands extend
onto the proposed lots. Given the topography and the findings of the previous delineation, it does
not seem likely that the wetlands indicated on the plan set do extend into any of the proposed lots.
This will need to be verified when the growing season begins. Staff does not feel, even in the event
the wetland extent is greater than shown, that it would impact the lots other than requiring that
buffer is provided, demarcated and recorded against the plat. It should not impact the viability of
the lots as suitable building sites.
Because these are flow - through systems, the outlets for these needs to be accommodated in the site
plan. The grading plan does provide for an overland flow and will be discussed further in the next
section.
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PRESERVATION
The applicant for the Arbor Cove development has submitted tree canopy coverage and
preservation calculations. They are as follows:
Planning Commission
Arbor Cove — Planning Case 2014 -05
April 15, 2014
Page 11 of 17
Total upland area (excluding wetlands) 3.26 ac. or 142,005 SF
Baseline canopy coverage 98% or 141,005 SF
Minimum canopy coverage allowed 55% or 78,103 SF
Proposed tree preservation 36% or 51,400 SF
The applicant does not meet minimum canopy coverage allowed; therefore, the difference
between the baseline and proposed tree preservation is multiplied by 1.2 to calculate the required
replacement plantings.
Difference in canopy coverage 26,703 SF
Multiplier 1.2
Total replacement 32,043 SF
Total number of trees to be planted 29 trees
The total number of trees required for the development is 29. The applicant has proposed a total
of 25 trees and does not meet minimum requirements. Staff recommends that the applicant
increase the number of trees planted in order to meet minimum quantity required.
No bufferyards are required for this low- density residential development.
The applicant has provided a landscape plan with 25 trees shown. However, there is no plant
schedule identifying the quantity of each species. Of the four species identified on the landscape
plan, staff recommends that the applicant select an alternate species for the Amur maple, which
can become invasive in natural areas. Since there are proposed natural areas in each rear yard,
an alternate ornamental selection would be appropriate.
The applicant is proposing to preserve a 33 -inch red oak (tree #33) that is in good condition
(healthy and structurally sound) on Lot 4. According to grading plans, the proposed and existing
grades appear to tie in about 20 feet from the trunk. This is a minimal amount of root
preservation. The applicant will need to allow for as much undisturbed root area as possible.
This root area is necessary not only for the continued growth and health of the tree, but also for
its structural stability after all of the surrounding existing trees have been removed and wind load
becomes a greater factor. Therefore, the applicant shall place tree preservation fencing at the
dripline or the furthest point possible from the trunk and no closer than 20 feet. Within the
fencing, the applicant shall spread a 3 to 4 -inch layer of woodchips to protect the root zone.
These protections shall remain in effect until construction is completed. If appropriate measures
are taken to protect the tree during construction, the preservation will be successful and the value
of this lot will increase.
This property is fully wooded by a native forest of sugar maple and basswood, an ecosystem
commonly referred to as the `Big Woods' that covered the majority of Chanhassen pre -
settlement. The existing wooded area is in good condition with no significant number of
undesirable or invasive species. The applicant is proposing a tree conservation easement in the
rear yards of each lot located outside of the grading limits. Staff recommends that these high -
quality woods be protected by an 85 -foot easement in the rear yards of Lots 2 through 4 and
follow the grading limits on Lot 1. This does not impact or change the proposed grading plans.
Planning Commission
Arbor Cove — Planning Case 2014 -05
April 15, 2014
Page 12 of 17
PARKS AND RECREATION
Parks
This property is located within an area of the city not currently served by a neighborhood park;
however, there is an abundance of parkland and open space in the vicinity of Arbor Cove. The
1,100 -acre Minnesota Landscape Arboretum is located one mile to the south and Minnewashta
Regional Park is located approximately one -half mile north of the site off of Highway 41.
Minnewashta Regional Park is a 340 -acre regional park facility operated by Carver County which
features a swimming beach, bathhouse, concession stand, picnic shelters, volleyball courts,
playground, trails and fishing pier. The city owns 10 acres of wooded open space at the intersection
of Tanadoona Drive and Highway 41. No additional parkland acquisition is being recommended as
a condition of this subdivision.
Trails
The subject site can access the West 78`x' Street pedestrian trail/sidewalk. Residents residing in the
four new homes will be required to walk/bike on- street for a distance of 750 feet prior to connecting
with the sidewalk. No additional trail construction is being recommended as a condition of this
subdivision.
In lieu of parkland dedication and/or trail construction, full park dedication fees shall be collected at
the rate in force at the time of final plat approval. At today's rate, these fees would total $23,200 (4
lots x $5,800 per lot).
COMPLIANCE TABLE
RSF Setbacks: Front: 30 feet, Side: 10 feet, Rear: 30 feet.
Lot Area
Lot
Lot
25 %Maximum
(sq. ft.)
Width
Depth
Site Coverage
Notes
(sq. ft.
Code
The OI district has a minimum
(RSF)
15,000
90
125
3,750
15,000 sq. ft., 75 ft. width, 150 ft.
depth., 65 % coverage
Lot 1
1 56,506
216
240
14,126
1.297 acres
Lot 2
29,513
141
263
7,378
.677 acre
Lot 3
28,256
117
282
7,064
.649 acre
Lot 4
27,604
119
269
6,901
.634 acre
Lot 5
2,326,540
618
1,267
1,512,251
53.41 acres
Total
2,468,419
56.67 acres
RSF Setbacks: Front: 30 feet, Side: 10 feet, Rear: 30 feet.
Planning Commission
Arbor Cove — Planning Case 2014 -05
April 15, 2014
Page 13 of 17
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Land Use Amendment, Rezoning
and Preliminary Plat subject to the following conditions of this staff report and adoption of the
attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation:
Parks & Recreation
1. In lieu of parkland dedication and/or trail construction, full park dedication fees shall be
collected at the rate in force at the time of final plat approval. At today's rate, these fees
would total $23,200 (4 lots x $5,800 per lot).
Building
1. Final grading plans and soil reports must be submitted to the Inspections Division before
building permits will be issued.
2. Engineered design and building permits are required for retaining walls exceeding four feet
in height.
3. Each lot must be provided with a separate sewer and water service.
4. Demolition permits must be obtained before demolishing any existing structures.
Natural Resources
1. The applicant shall plant a total of 29 trees in the development. A revised landscape plan
shall be required prior to final plat approval.
2. The applicant shall remove Amur maple from the plant list and replace it with an alternate
ornamental tree.
3. Prior to any grading, the applicant shall install tree preservation fencing using metal stakes
around tree #33 on Lot 4. The fencing shall be placed at the dripline or the furthest point
possible from the trunk and no closer than 20 feet. Within the fencing, the applicant shall
spread a 3 to 4 -inch layer of woodchips to protect the root zone. These protections shall
remain in effect until construction is completed.
4. A tree conservation easement shall be recorded east of the grading limits on Lot 1, over the
rear 85 feet of Lots 2 through 3 4- and over the rear 75 feet of Lot 4. The applicant shall
supply a legal description for the easement.
5. Easement signage shall be placed on the lot lines at the point of intersection with the
easement on Lots 2 through 4. Signage shall be placed at points of directional change on Lot
1. Signs shall be approved by the city.
Planning Commission
Arbor Cove — Planning Case 2014 -05
April 15, 2014
Page 14 of 17
Engineering
1. The grading plan shows steep slopes on Lots 2 and 4. Grading must be revised so that no
slope is steeper than 3:1.
2. Grading plans must be revised to show existing and proposed elevations at each lot corner
and the center of the proposed driveways at the curb line.
3. The developer's engineer must revise plans to include spot elevations and building corner
elevations that direct water flow away from all structures.
4. Grading plan must show spot elevations to illustrate where water will flow at the back of Lot
3.
5. The EOF shall be noted with arrows showing the direction of the overflow.
6. Include a lot benching detail in the plans.
7. Draintile service must be provided for Lots 3 and 4, which have drainage flows from the
back to the front of the lot.
8. Proposed stockpile areas must be indentified in the plans.
9. All existing easements shown in the plans must be properly referenced with the document
number or plat they were dedicated under.
10. A conservation easement is proposed along the back of Lots 2, 3 and 4 as well as the east
corner of Lot 1.
11. A new drainage and utility easement over the filtration basin and the channel on Lot 1 will
provide the City access to these stormwater facilities.
12. The developer's engineer must include the elevation of the top and bottom of the retaining
walls.
13. The following retaining wall materials are prohibited: smooth face, poured in place concrete
(stamped or patterned is acceptable), masonry, railroad ties and timber.
14. Grading must be revised to include a swale at the top of the retaining walls for drainage.
15. The topography shown must include elevation contours for Dogwood Road adjacent to the
proposed lots. The centerline gradients must be labeled. The developer's engineer must
incorporate pressure- reducing valves and a surge protection system into the watermain plans.
16. At the time of final plat, the Dogwood Road improvements assessment must be paid or
reassessed.
17. Partial water and sewer hookup fees must be paid at the time of final plat.
Planning Commission
Arbor Cove — Planning Case 2014 -05
April 15, 2014
Page 15 of 17
Water Resources
1. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan ( SWPPP) including all required elements listed in
the General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction
Activity Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System/State Disposal System
Program must be prepared and submitted to the city for review and approval.
2. No native soils may be used in the filtration soil. Instead Mix B from the MN Stormwater
Manual - 70% washed sand and 30% leaf - litter compost mixture shall be used.
3. Pretreatment practices to be employed shall be shown on the plan view and in the detail
sheet. This shall be shown at the curb cut. It is highly recommended that something similar
to the Rain Guardian developed by Anoka Conservation District be used. The pretreatment
device must be approved by the City.
4. It shall be called out on both grading plans that steps shall be taken to prevent compaction
and siltation of the area resulting from construction activities on the site.
5. Remove the filter fabric from the detail and use a choker course of rock instead.
6. The underdrain shall be smooth walled and have a tracer wire.
7. A knife gate valve shall be included prior to the underdrain entering the proposed 27 -inch
manhole. This valve shall be reasonable easy to access.
8. Calculations shall be provided demonstrating that the feature will draw down within 48
hours.
9. Efforts shall be made to decrease the depth as close as possible to the 9.6 inches but no
greater than the 14.4 inches recommended for MH HSG B soils.
10. Side slopes shall be no steeper than 5:1 and as close to 10:1 as possible except that the south
boundary may be up to 3:1.
11. The feature shall be kept offline until the vegetation has been established. Plans and the
SWPPP must include this information and describe the methodology to be used to achieve
this.
12. A detailed planting plan and schedule must be developed and included in plan set for
approval
13. The in -situ soils shall be ripped to a depth of 12 inches prior placing the amended filtration
soils.
14. The developer shall be responsible for the construction of the biofiltration feature and shall
make assurances that the plant materials, mulch and side slopes into biofiltration feature are
Planning Commission
Arbor Cove — Planning Case 2014 -05
April 15, 2014
Page 16 of 17
maintained throughout the life of the feature. This is most typically accomplished though a
Homeowners Association. The city will be responsible for maintenance of the underdrain,
outlet pipe and inlet protection device at the curb. An operations and maintenance manual
shall be developed describing how the feature will be maintained and by who will be
responsible for the maintenance.
15. The applicant shall include tree 119 and 129 into the protection plan.
16. The drainage and utility easement shall extend from top of bank to top of bank for the
proposed channel.
17. The 988 and 986 contours shall be broadened to create a more laminar flow before
discharging onto city right -of -way.
18. The plan shall maintain a separation of at least two (2) feet between peak flow elevation in
the channel during the 100 -year storm event and the top of bank for that portion behind the
proposed structure on Lot 1.
19. The SWPPP as well as the erosion control plan must indicate how the conveyance from the
wetland will be permanently stabilized.
20. A detail of the rock checks must be included. This shall be consistent with Technical
Supplement 14C to Part 654 of the National Engineering Handbook.
21. An estimated surface water management connection fee of $14,066.50 will be due with the
final plat.
22. The plans must meet all requirements set forth by other agencies with authority over the site.
The applicant is responsible to procure all necessary approvals and permissions. This
includes, among others, the MN Pollution Control Agency and the Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District.
Plannine
1. Lots 1 through 4 are the only lots included in the land use map amendment from
Public /Semi- Public to Residential Low Density.
2. Approval of the Land Use Amendment is subject to Metropolitan Council determination of
consistency with system plan.
3. Lots 1 through 4 are the only lots included in the rezoning from Office Institutional District
to Single - Family Residential.
4. Approval of the Rezoning is contingent upon approval of the final plat and execution of the
development contract.
Planning Commission
Arbor Cove — Planning Case 2014 -05
April 15, 2014
Page 17 of 17
ATTACHMENTS
1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation.
2. Development Review Application.
3. Reduced Copy Preliminary Plat.
4. Reduced Copy Preliminary Grading Plan.
5. Reduced Copy Secondary Grading Plan.
6. Reduced Copy Preliminary Tree Preservation Plan.
7. Reduced Copy Preliminary Forestation Plan.
8. Reduced Copy Preliminary Erosion & Sediment Control Plan.
9. Figure 2 -1. Land Use Table in 5 -Year Stages.
10. Figure 2 -2. 2008 -2030 Land Use Comparison.
11. Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List.
g: \plan\2014 planning cases\2014 -06 arbor cove\resubmittal 03- 14- 2014\staff report arbor cove.doc
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND RECOMMENDATION
IN RE:
Application of Dogwood Road, LLC and Westwood Church for Land Use Map Amendment,
Rezoning and Subdivision approval.
On April 15, 2014 the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting
to consider the application of Dogwood Road, LLC and Westwood Church for a land use map
amendment from Public /Semi - Public to Residential Low Density, rezoning of the property from
Office Institutional District to Single - Family Residential and subdivision approval to create five
lots. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed subdivision
preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all
interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The property is currently zoned Office Institutional District, OI.
2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Public /Semi - Public uses.
3. The legal description of the property is: See attached Exhibit A.
4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse
affects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are:
a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and
provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive
Plan.
b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the
area.
c) The proposed use conforms to all performance standards contained in the Zoning
Ordinance.
d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed.
e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not
overburden the city's service capacity.
1) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the
property.
The Subdivision Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider seven possible
adverse affects of the proposed subdivision. The seven (7) affects and our findings regarding
them are:
a. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance;
b. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans
including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan;
c. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils,
vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and stone water
drainage are suitable for the proposed development;
d. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage,
sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this
subdivision ordinance;
e. The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage;
f. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record; and
g. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the
following exists:
1) Lack of adequate storm water drainage.
2) Lack of adequate roads.
3) Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems.
4) Lack of adequate off -site public improvements or support systems.
6. The planning report #2014 -06 dated April 15, 2014, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is
incorporated herein.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission approves the land use map amendment to Residential Low
Density, the rezoning to Single - Family Residential District and Preliminary Plat creating five
lots.
ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 15`h day of April, 2014.
CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL
Chair
i
E�
C4
W
6
a¢�
fi4
2�
N�
a�
4gfi
�e
�Y
€S
SS
yi<
E�
FF
a8
lit
$Vs
a"
s €o
B 9g5
so
S
�o
s €
aka
Eq�
a„
�e€
Rs
�t
i
iQ
3y
8�
h�
gg
�6 Y
fy
d�
�i
�Cs
5�
g�a
�aa
e�
a�€
$a�
i�
XQ�
Ei€
a
a�
)5S)#
3�
ES
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard
Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317
Phone: (952) 227 -13001 Fax: (952) 227 -1110
CITY OF CHANBASSEN
APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
Date Fled: ✓1 G 60 -Day Review Deadline: 511-614 Planner. p 6 Case kti�1 Lk — (Y_
LQ Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Subdivision
............... .. ......
❑ Minor MUSH line for failing on -site sewers .....
$600
$100
E] Create 3 lots or less ............. ........:..:...............$300
Er Create over 3 lots .......................$600 .+ $15 per lot
❑ Conditional Use Permit
❑ Metes & Bounds....... 1 ..::....:........$300 + $50 per lot
❑ Single - Family Residence . ...............................
$325
❑ Consolidate Lots...... ,,:..... ............................... $150
❑ All Others .............................. ...........................
$425
❑ Lot Line Adjustment ....... ,......... ,............... : ....... $150
$250 ❑ Final Plat* .....:...... :....:...::................. .... .......... ...
❑ Interim Use Permit '. .
*Requires additional $450 escrow for attorney costs.
❑ In conjunction with Single - Family Residence.. $325
Escrow will be required for other applications through the
development contract.
❑ All Others .............................. ...........................
$425
❑ Grading ? 1,000 cubic yards ................. - ......
- UBC
❑ Vacation of Easements/Right -of- way................... $300
(Additional recording fees may apply)
Rezoning
❑ Planned Unit Development (PUD) ..................
$750
❑ Variance................................ ............................... $200
❑ Minor Amendment to existing PUD .................
$100
❑ Wetland Alteration Permit
[TAll Others .......................... ...............................
$500
.
❑ Single - Family Residence... ............................ $150
❑ Sign Plan Review, ............................... ....... ..........
$150
❑ All Others ...................... ............................... $275
❑ Site Plan Review
❑ Zoning Appeal ... . ............... :... ..............................- $100
❑ Administrative ................... ...............................
$100
❑ Commercial /Industrial Districts * ......................
$500
❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment ......,..........:.......... $500
Plus $10 per 1,000 square
feet of building area
NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently,
Include number of e)dsting
employees:
the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application.
and number of new employees:
E3 Residential Districts .............. ...........................
$500
( Refer to the appropriate Application ChecMist for required submiNal
Plus $5 per dwelling unit
information that must accompany this application)
ADDITIONAL REQUIRED FEES:
Er Notification Sign .................... ............................... $200
(City to install and remove)
Property Owners' List within 500' ........ $3 per address` vt
(City to generate - fee determined at pre- application meeting)
❑ Escrow for Recording Documents.. $5Q per document
(CUP /SPRNACNARNVAP /Metes & Bounds Subdivision)
Project Name: T lelooy lbJt
Property Address or Location:
TOTAL FEES: $ 2 d "eb
Received from _00woc"6 VA4.l -_L_G
Date Received: Check Number: r4
=
Parcel # :ZS bUc33310 Legal Description: U,,,.,
Total Acreage: Sg.1. Wetlands Present? ® Yes ❑ No nn
Present Zoning: l A.. rxJt^— Requested Zoning: n•�
Present Land Use Designation: C��n. vt.C� Requested Land Use Designation:
Existing Use of Property .
Description of Proposal:
❑ Check box if separate narrative is attached
APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained
authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to
the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by
the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application
should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this
application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I
further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to
any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct
Name: Contact: Jodj tW. �:w.�•�.c
Address: 576,bT 2�+� -joy- �- Phone: `%I- %Ico StAl
City /StatefZip:
Email:
Signat
Cell:
Fax:
Date: `S 14 114
PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do,
authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those
conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of
the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may
be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the
study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. tt ((�� ` I
Name: � 0- Tm- �,� C L •rrIL-1 Contact: Y i L ' C4"
Address:'3, V" WK1�hx� br- Phone: `%SZ 22.q -*3-: !p
City /State/Zip: K-W Cell: qSA °ei Ry'7 3710
Email:
Fax:
Date:
This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all
information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the
appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and
applicable procedural requirements.
A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A
written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application.
PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable)
Name:
Contact:
Address:
Phone:
City/StatefZip:
Cell:
Email:
Fax:
Section 4: Notification
Information
Who should receive copies of staff reports?
*Other Contact Information:
❑ Property Owner.
Via: ❑ Email
❑ Mailed Paper Copy
Name:
❑ Applicant
'Via: ❑ Email
❑ Mailed Paper Copy
Address:
❑ Engineer
. Via: ❑ Email
❑ Mailed Paper Copy
City/State/Zip:
❑ Other*
Via: ❑ Email
❑ Mailed Paper Copy
Email:
CITY RECEIVE EN
MAR 14 2014
NANHA8IENRANNINAMT
n
/`P�
T
3
1K1C; dfVE
J % \
I 1
$ N
DEKtOPEF
— ttTtlRS vebxE aruu OO�r,000 .Poh R C
rvwr - m• srrrr wtis
v!< CHxxtIESSEx, uv SSI�>
cunrecr+r axrvEh:
�ir'cs°rvr000 oai� cmrPCn
ExCC(9PP. 55]]I
n r
er -1-11 _ ee.m x n u asmKr
�:
r mv waaao - .v wrs vov nca
WCINITY MAP
•emu
I
I
i
i
,. �,o ov,,,r.�w vy.,,: •u mr au. o< mt..,.w:
.,
-
"°°'
ARBOR COVE
DOGWOOD ROAD, LLC
CHANHASSEN, MN
PRELIMINARYPLAT
19-0546
SHEETNO. 1 OF 6 SHEETS
SIOI14
A
CITY OF CHANHA"EN °.
RECEIVED o u,
MAR 1 4 2014
/ �4 • ; _
CHANHA%EN PIANNINO DEPT r„ s
s�
i
y
s,
3
BL GK" ONE
I 1
I
N
-W WIL
F/L MA AON 6A9N nETAIL
PRELIMINARY PRIMARY 130515
GRADING PLAN
RHXF NO J OF A qmp .0 9HN1.
ciTY RECEIVED SEN
MAR 1 4 2014
CHANHAWNP1ANNINGNPT
-- I
I �I
1
I
i
I
61,. ONE
T4,1
DOGWOOD ROAD, LLC
CHANHASSEN, MN
Lam
�M1.A� ..u.m
PRELIMINARY SECONDARY I" -
r
I I�
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
MAR 4
N CHANHASSENRlANNINGDEPT
Ir
\ t
\ /
el
J
` J %
�.J
' •
s
'
AL a
K
/
J
,
s
�•
-I
lop
•
i
/
\
el
J
` J %
�.J
ROAD, LLC
.SEN, MN
armxc uxWVr mjrcn.¢�w[x,r2o IA•Aac[u( nap A.
PRELIMINARY TREE„ I 73-0595
-I
ROAD, LLC
.SEN, MN
armxc uxWVr mjrcn.¢�w[x,r2o IA•Aac[u( nap A.
PRELIMINARY TREE„ I 73-0595
ci7v RECEIVED�N
MAN "F 4 2014
CHANHASSEN PLANNING REPS
1-
I'
1
1
I
I CK - ONE
DOGWOOD ROAD, LLC
CHANHASSEN, MN
N
E
�. W
PRELIMINARY
13 -0545
clry RECEIVED�N
MO MEIVr EQXiYfl OM
ccwsmucnov mvI C a B.sw ,wu
MAR "I 4 2014 �MRCM �U.M r=L
R Ccr 10 H0♦.PE1651.IB'f iRO
11
CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEN "� �
MIEr RIOIECnM / *N`
SW HI610
KBRTIaCUt�w FLOW � 1
i 1
N
+ (Y.I�q BaC)i(YI CIffi IXS
W EBayav co-vma : �
9LAyYEI `
1
A
4/'
i/e R0�
%^ J
1� MULCH / SEED
ce�i
1ccrvrmx
IM r
FAOrFCnON I
ONE
f J�
cvma m ca ,
u+u >
C. '^""'°'�' ^ "'�'� �y� "' ARBOR COVE PRELIMINARY EROSION
70 DOGWOOD ROAD, LLC & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 13-0546
- er�lvr..a. r++m CHANHASSEN, MN SHEET NO. B OF B SHEETS 3/10/14
Figure 2 -1. LAND USE TABLE IN 5 -YEAR STAGES
Existing and Planned Land Use Table (in acres)
Within Urban Service Area
Allowed Density Range
Existin 9
(2000)
2010
2015
2020
2025
2030
Change
2000.2030
Minimum
Maximum
Residential Land Uses
Low Density Residential (developed)
1.2
4
2,600
3,100
3,917
4,495
4,544
4,696
2,096
Low Density Residential (vacant)
2,102
1,602
779
201
152
-
Medium Density Residential (developed)
4
8
155
300
326
356
381
406
251
Medium Density Residential (vacant)
245
100
80
50
25
-
High Density Residential (developed)
8
16
55
112
140
187
202
225
1 170
High Density Residential (vacant)
11
163
106
85
38
23
-
Mixed Use primarily Residential' (developed)
8
20
30
40
45
50
501
50
20
Mixed Use Primarily Residential" (vacant)
i
20
10
5
-
-
-
C /I Land Uses
Est. Employees /Acre
Commercial (developed)
25
240
270
300
318
320
328
88
Commercial (vacant)
88
58
28
10
8
-
Industrial (developed )
7
500
632
800
841
860
883
383
Industrial (vacant )
383
251
1 83
42
23
-
Office(developed )
28
240
260
300
321
330
335
95
Office (vacant)
99
79
35
14
5
1 -
Mixed Use Primarily C /I' (developed)
26
35
40
45
65
651
65
30
Mixed Use Primarily C /I" (vacant)
30
25
20
-
-
-
Extractive
_
Public /Semi Public Land Uses
Institutional
1,213
1,213
1,210
1,210
1,210
1,210
(3)
Parks and Recreation
417
430
438
457
457
457
40
Open Space
934
934
934
934
934
934
-
Roadway Rights of Way
1,237
1,237
1,237
1,237
1,237
1,237
-
utility
Railroad
Airport
Subtotal Sewered
10,786
10,799
10,807
10,826
10,826
10,826
3,170
Outside Urban Service Area
Minimum
lot size
Maximum
lot size
Existing
(2000
2010
2015
2020
2025
2030
Change
20004030
Rural Residential 2.5 acres or less
_
Rural Residential 2.5 -10 acres
2.5
no
971
971
971
971
971
971
-
Rural Residential 10-40 acres
_
Agricultural 40- acres
40
27
19
-
-
-
(40)
Agriculture land use
904
904
904
904
904
904
-
Subtotal Unsewered
1,915
1,902
1,894
1,875
1,875
1,875
(40)
Undeveloped
Wetlands within land use designations)
2,210
2,210
2,210
2,210
2,210
2,210
-
Open Water, Rivers and Streams
2,059
2,059
2,059
2,059
2,059
2,059
-
Total
14,760
14,760
14,760
14,760
14,760
14,760
3,130
GAPLAN12008 Comp PlanWmendments \Land Use Map\Arbor Cove \Land Use 5 year Arbor Cove.xls 4/2/2014
Figure 2 -2 2008 - 2030 Land Use Comparison
2020
2030
Land Use Plan
Land Use
Plan
Change 2020 -2030
Land Use
Acres
Percent
Acres
Percent
Acres
Commercial
142
1.2%
328
2.2%
186
Office /Industrial
694
5.7%
883
6.0%
189
Office
114
0.9%
335
2.3%
221
Parks & Open Space
1,297
10.6%
1,391
9.4%
94
Public /Semi - Public
1,204
9.9%
1,210
8.2%
6
Residential Large Lot
870
7.1%
971
6.6%
101
Residential Low Density
3,295
27.0%
4,696
31.8%
1,401
Residential Medium Density
219
1.8%
406
2.8%
187
Residential High Density
120
1.0%
225
1.5%
105
Mixed Use
51
0.4%
115
0.8%
64
Undevelopable
4,200
34.4%
4200 ,
28.5%
-
TOTAL
12,206
14,760
2554
Undevelopable
Lakes, Floodplain, Rivers, Streams
2,059
Road Right -of -Way
1,237
Agriculture
904
TOTAL
4,200
GAPLAM2008 Comp PlankAmendments \Land Use MapkArbor Cove \land use comparison 2008 - 2030.xis 4/2/2014
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) ss.
COUNTY OF CARVER )
I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on
April 3, 2014, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota;
that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for
Arbor Cove — Planning Case 2014 -06 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A ", by
enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the
envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid
thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the
records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records.
Subs bed and sworn to before me
this J day of AQri —12014.
Notary Publ c�
Kar n J. E gel rdt, Deputy Clerk
=EEN nn� " "'a N a R,,.......:' M 316
Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Hearing
Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting
Date & Time:
Tuesday, March 15, 2014 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start
until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda.
Location:
City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd.
Request for a Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment of
3.26 acres from Public/Semi- Public to Residential Low Density;
Proposal:
Rezoning of 3.26 acres from Office Institutional District (OI) to
Single Family Residential District (RSF); and Preliminary Plat
Review of 54.67 acres into 5 lots — ARBOR COVE
Applicant:
Dogwood Road, LLC/Westwood Church
Property
3121 Westwood Drive
Location:
A location map is on the reverse side of this notice.
The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the
applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood
about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the
What Happens
public hearing through the following steps:
at the Meeting:
1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project.
2. The applicant will present plans on the project.
3. Comments are received from the public.
4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses
the project.
If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit
the City's projects web page at:
www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us /2014 -06. If you wish to talk to
someone about this project, please contact Bob Generous by
Questions &
email at bgenerous(a)ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at
Comments:
952- 227 -1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is
helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the
meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The
staff report for this item will be available online on the
project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the
Planning Commission meeting.
City Revisal Procedure:
• Subdimions, Manned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Welland Alterations, Rezonings,
Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City
ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is
invited to attend the meeting.
• Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are
available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation.
The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will dose the
public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify
wholly or partly the Manning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority
vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercialfindustdal.
• Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard.
Some applications due to their complexity may lake several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the
process should check with the Manning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting.
• A neighborhood spokesperson /representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to
meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s).
• Because the Manning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence
regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report,
lease contact the Manning Staff person named on the nofificz6on.
Date & Time:
Tuesday, March 15, 2014 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start
until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda.
Location:
City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd.
Request for a Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment of
3.26 acres from Public/Semi- Public to Residential Low Density;
Proposal:
Rezoning of 3.26 acres from Office Institutional District (OI) to
Single Family Residential District (RSF); and Preliminary Plat
Review of 54.67 acres into 5 lots — ARBOR COVE
Applicant:
Dogwood Road, LLC/Westwood Church
Property
3121 Westwood Drive
Location:
A location map is on the reverse side of this notice.
The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the
applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood
about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the
What Happens
public hearing through the following steps:
at the Meeting:
1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project.
2. The applicant will present plans on the project.
3. Comments are received from the public.
4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses
the project.
If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit
the City's projects web page at:
wvvw.ci.chanhassen.mn.us /2014 -06. If you wish to talk to
someone about this project, please contact Bob Generous by
Questions &
email at bgenerous(o)ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at
Comments:
952- 227 -1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is
helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the
meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The
staff report for this item will be available online on the
project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the
Planning Commission meeting.
City Review Procedure:
• Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings,
Comprehensive Man Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City
ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is
invited to attend the meeting.
• Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent Information and a recommendation. These reports are
available by request. Al the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation.
The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the
public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify
wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority
vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerciallndustdal.
• Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard.
Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the
process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting.
• A neighborhood spokesperson /representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to
meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s).
• Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence
regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report,
lease contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification.
ALAN H & KAREN L DIRKS ALLEN K JR & JENNIFER R LARSON BARBARA A PELZEL
7431 DOGWOOD RD 21195 RADISSON RD 2960 HIGHWOOD DR
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -8013 SHOREWOOD, MN 55331 -9189 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -4438
CHARLES H NEWELL III DANIEL D & AMY R GETSCH DAVID L BUSS
7550 DOGWOOD RD 11711 ASTER WAY 7638 ARBORETUM VILLAGE PL
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -8053 WOODBURY, MN 55129 -6706 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -4424
DAVID L KERSTEN DAVID R & JENNIFER L MELIN REV GONYEA HOMES INC
7561 BEACON CT 7321 DOGWOOD RD 6102 OLSON MEMORIAL HWY
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -4554 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -8015 GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55422 -4919
GRETCHEN L F STARKS HEATHER H NEUBAUER HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT OF MN
3301 TANADOONA DR 3360 78TH ST W INC
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -8048 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -4553 422 EAST COUNTY ROAD D
ST PAUL, MN 55117 -1218
HIGHLANDS AT BLUFF CREEK JEFFREY A FRANKE JEFFREY M ENDRESS
510 CHESTNUT ST 7511 DOGWOOD RD 7521 BEACON CT
CHASKA, MN 55318 -3300 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -8052 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -4554
JOHN H GANS JOHN H GETSCH JOHN P REILLY JR
7591 BEACON CT 5 HAZELTINE EST 7401 DOGWOOD RD
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -4554 CHASKA, MN 55318 -1039 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -8013
JOHN R ROERS KAREN I PETERSEN REV TRUST KIP A KAUFMANN
7541 BEACON CT 3321 78THST WAY 2990 HIGHWOOD DR
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -4554 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -4512 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -4438
MARJORIE D GETSCH TRUST MARK D HANSON MATTHEW D BARRETT
7530 DOGWOOD RD 7491 DOGWOOD RD 7551 BEACON CT
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -8053 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -8013 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -4554
MATTHEW KEITHLY MATTHEW S LIST MEI -KUEI HJERMSTAD
7581 BEACON CT 7571 BEACON CT 2056 WATERLEAF LN W
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -4554 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -4554 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8342
MICHAEL P EVANS MICHAEL P QUIST MICHAEL S SMITH
3280 78TH ST W 16962 SADDLEWOOD TRL 7501 DOGWOOD RD
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -4553 MINNETONKA, MN 55345 -2677 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -8013
CAMP FIRE MINNESOTA PETERSON REVOCABLE TRUST PRIYADARSHEE D MATHUR
4829 MINNETONKA BLVD SUITE 202 3301 TANADOONA DR 7531 BEACON CT
ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -8048 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -4554
PULTE HOMES OF MINNESOTA
CORP
PO BOX 3660
PORTLAND, OR 97208 -3660
RICHARD C LUNDELL
7341 DOGWOOD RD
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -8015
SUMIKA CHAI
6913 ANTRIM
EDINA, MN 55439 -1707
REGENTS OF THE UNIV OF MINN
319 15TH ST SE 424 DONHOWE BLD
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55455 -0179
SCOTT A VERGIN
7311 DOGWOOD RD
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -8015
THE ARBORS HOMEOWNERS ASSN
7591 BEACON CT W
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -4554
WESTWOOD COMMUNITY CHURCH WILLIAM JR & MARY S
3121 WESTWOOD DR COLOPOULOS
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -8044 2970 HIGHWOOD DR
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -4438
RENAE MURPHY
2980 HIGHWOOD DR
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -4438
SCOTT M HOLTHUSEN
8421 ALLEGHENY GRV
VICTORIA, MN 55386 -8203
VICKI L DILLON
7481 DOGWOOD RD
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -8013
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) ss.
COUNTY OF CARVER )
I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on
April 7, 2014, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota;
that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Notice of Public
Hearing CORRECTION for Arbor Cove — Planning Case 2014 -06 to the persons named on
attached Exhibit "A ", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner,
and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage
fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such
by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate
records.
Kar 1 J. Eng h dt, Depa Clerk
Subscribed and sworn to before me
this `1I'` day of Per i 2014.
KIM T. MEUWISSEN
Notary Public- Minnesota
My Commrssbn Expirm im 91, 2015
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
PLANNING COMMISSION
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CORRECTION
Dear Property Owner:
On April 3, 2014, the City of Chanhassen mailed a public hearing notice to you regarding the
following proposal:
Request for a Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment of 3.26 acres from Public /Semi - Public
to Residential Low Density; Rezoning of 3.26 acres from Office Institutional District (OI) to Single
Family Residential District (RSF); and Preliminary Plat Review of 54.67 acres into 5 lots —
ARBOR COVE
The date of the public hearing was listed incorrectly as March 15, 2014. The correct date of the
public hearing is TUESDAY, APRIL 15, 2014. The meeting will begin at 7:00 p.m.
If you have questions regarding this proposal, contact Bob Generous at 952 - 227 -1131 or by email at
bgenerous?Dci.chanhassen.mn.us, or visit the project web page at
www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us /2014 -06.
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
PLANNING COMMISSION
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CORRECTION
Dear Property Owner:
On April 3, 2014, the City of Chanhassen mailed a public hearing notice to you regarding the
following proposal:
Request for a Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment of 3.26 acres from Public /Semi - Public
to Residential Low Density; Rezoning of 3.26 acres from Office Institutional District (OI) to Single
Family Residential District (RSF); and Preliminary Plat Review of 54.67 acres into 5 lots —
ARBOR COVE
The date of the public hearing was listed incorrectly as March 15, 2014. The correct date of the
public hearing is TUESDAY, APRIL 15, 2014. The meeting will begin at 7:00 p.m.
If you have questions regarding this proposal, contact Bob Generous at 952 - 227 -1131 or by email at
bgenerous (a)ci.chanhassen.mn.us, or visit the project web page at
www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us /2014 -06.
ALAN H & KAREN L DIRKS ALLEN K JR & JENNIFER R LARSON BARBARA A PELZEL
7431 DOGWOOD RD 21195 RADISSON RD 2960 HIGHWOOD DR
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -8013 SHOREWOOD, MN 55331 -9189 CHANHASSEN, MN 553174438
CHARLES H NEWELL III DANIEL D & AMY R GETSCH DAVID L BUSS
7550 DOGWOOD RD 11711 ASTER WAY 7638 ARBORETUM VILLAGE PL
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -8053 WOODBURY, MN 55129 -6706 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -4424
DAVID L KERSTEN DAVID R & JENNIFER L MELIN REV GONYEA HOMES INC
7561 BEACON CT 7321 DOGWOOD RD 6102 OLSON MEMORIAL HWY
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -4554 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -8015 GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55422 -4919
GRETCHEN L F STARKS HEATHER H NEUBAUER HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT OF MN
3301 TANADOONA DR 3360 78TH ST W INC
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -8048 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -4553 422 EAST COUNTY ROAD D
ST PAUL, MN 55117 -1218
HIGHLANDS AT BLUFF CREEK JEFFREY A FRANKE JEFFREY M ENDRESS
510 CHESTNUT ST 7511 DOGWOOD RD 7521 BEACON CT
CHASKA, MN 55318 -3300 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -8052 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -4554
JOHN H GANS JOHN H GETSCH JOHN P REILLY JR
7591 BEACON CT 5 HAZELTINE EST 7401 DOGWOOD RD
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -4554 CHASKA, MN 55318 -1039 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -8013
JOHN R ROERS KAREN I PETERSEN REV TRUST KIP A KAUFMANN
7541 BEACON CT 3321 78THST WAY 2990 HIGHWOOD DR
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -4554 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -4512 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -4438
MARJORIE D GETSCH TRUST MARK D HANSON MATTHEW D BARRETT
7530 DOGWOOD RD 7491 DOGWOOD RD 7551 BEACON CT
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -8053 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -8013 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -4554
MATTHEW KEITHLY MATTHEW S LIST MEI -KUEI HJERMSTAD
7581 BEACON CT 7571 BEACON CT 2056 WATERLEAF LN W
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -4554 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -4554 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8342
MICHAEL P EVANS MICHAEL P QUIST MICHAEL S SMITH
3280 78TH ST W 16962 SADDLEWOOD TRL 7501 DOGWOOD RD
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -4553 MINNETONKA, MN 55345 -2677 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -8013
CAMP FIRE MINNESOTA PETERSON REVOCABLE TRUST PRIYADARSHEE D MATHUR
4829 MINNETONKA BLVD SUITE 202 3301 TANADOONA DR 7531 BEACON CT
ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -8048 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -4554
PULTE HOMES OF MINNESOTA
CORP
PO BOX 3660
PORTLAND, OR 97208 -3660
RICHARD C LUNDELL
7341 DOGWOOD RD
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -8015
SUMIKA CHAI
6913 ANTRIM
EDINA, MN 55439 -1707
REGENTS OF THE UNIV OF MINN
319 15TH ST SE 424 DONHOW E BLD
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55455 -0179
SCOTT A VERGIN
7311 DOGWOOD RD
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -8015
THE ARBORS HOMEOWNERS ASSN
7591 BEACON CT W
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -4554
WESTWOOD COMMUNITY CHURCH WILLIAM JR & MARY S
3121 WESTWOOD DR COLOPOULOS
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -8044 2970 HIGHWOOD DR
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -4438
RENAE MURPHY
2980 HIGHWOOD DR
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -4438
SCOTT M HOLTHUSEN
8421 ALLEGHENY GRV
VICTORIA, MN 55386 -8203
VICKI L DILLON
7481 DOGWOOD RD
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -8013
I`
I"
g
TREE CONSERVATION EASEMENT
1 I Flo
� I 5)
�7g �J
B \ �� NE
K
I g \I I
Q�
DATE:
MOTION BY:
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO: 2014-
SECONDED BY:
RESOLUTION APPROVING
A LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT TO
THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Chanhassen submitted the proposed Comprehensive Plan Land Use
Amendment from Public /Semi- Public to Residential — Low Density to Residential — Low to adjacent
communities on February 5, 2015, for their review. There were no objections or negative comments.
The 60 -day agency review period ended on April 7, 2014.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to review the Comprehensive Plan
Land Use Map Amendment on April 15, 2014, found the amendment consistent with the City of
Chanhassen 2030 Comprehensive Plan and voted to recommend that City Council adopt the amendment.
WHEREAS, the Chanhassen City Council held a hearing on April 28, 2014 to review the
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Amendment and voted unanimously to approve the amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council approves the
2030 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Amendment from Public /Semi - Public to Residential — Low
Density for the property described as Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Block 1, Arbor Cove, Carver County, Minnesota,
subject to review and determination of consistency with the Metropolitan Council 2030 System Plan.
Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 28u' day of April, 2014.
ATTEST:
Todd Gerhardt, City Manager
YES
Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor
NO ABSENT
gAplan'2014 pla miug cases\2014 -06 arbor cove \mubmina103- 14- 20144esolutiov land use map ammdmmt.dm