Admin Section ADMINISTRATIVE SECTION
Letter to Zachary Development Company dated July 6, 1989.
Letter from MWCC dated May 30, 1989.
Letter to Thomas Motherway dated June 21, 1989.
Letter from Twin Cities Regional Cable Channel dated June 19,
1989.
Memo from Jean Meuwissen dated ,Tune 21, 1989.
Letter to Doris Larson dated June 26, 1989.
Letter from Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District dated
May 30, 1989.
Memo from Lori Sietsema .dated June 20, 1989.
Letter from Roger Knutson dated June 12, 1989.
Letter from Rosemount dated June 13, 1989.
The Springsted Letter dated June 1, 1989.
New Housing Update dated June, 1989.
Development Schedule for Medical, Arts Buildin g dated June 8, 1989.
IILetter from Voto, Tautges, Redpath & Co. dated May 10, 1989.
Letter from Barton-Aschman Associates dated June 8, 1989.
IILetter to B.C. Burdick dated June 12, 1989.
Letter from Carver County dated June 1, 1989.
Memo from Deb Rand dated April 25, 1989.
Memo from Steve Kirchman and Carl Barks dated May 22, 1989.
Memo from Jean Meuwissen dated June 9, 1989.
Memo from Scott Harr dated June 20, 1989.
Letter from Minnehaha Creek Watershed District dated May 31,
1989.
Letter from Governor Perpich dated June 22, 1989.
Engineering Department Agenda Item List dated June 27, 1989.
Memo from Ron Julkowski dated June 19, 1989.
Letter from League of Minnesota Cities dated June 23, 1989.
I
■
tMemo from Fred Hoisington dated June 30, 1989.
Silt Fence Fact Sheet dated November, 1987.
Sediment Basin Fact Sheet dated November, 1987.
' Correspondence to and from Rob Tautges.
Memo to Gary Warren dated July 3, 1989.
Memo to Don Ashworth dated June 29, 1989.
Letter from Gary Warren dated June 28, 1989.
Letter to Argus Development dated June 26, 1989.
HRA Accounts Payable dated July 10, 1989.
Memo from Lori Sietsema dated June 30, 1989.
Newsletter from Ehlers and Associates dated July, 1989.
Memo to Jo Ann Olsen dated July 5, 1989.
1
' I
Acir m Sec-him
CITY OF
1 r
CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
' July 6 , 1989
Zachary Development Company
Attn: Mr. Sandy Ritter
' 120 - 1st Avenue North
Minneapolis , MN 55 401
' Re: Street Cleanup
File No. 84-7 (pvt)
' Dear Mr. Ritter:
Our Public Safety Department has received complaints concerning
mud and dirt on the roadways in the Fox Chase subdivision. Much
' of this no doubt has accumulated due to the wet spring conditions
and builders tracking mud into the roadway. It has been quite
some time, if ever, that these roadways have been thoroughly
' swept to remove construction debris .
I believe this would be an appropriate time to have the sub-
division streets thoroughly swept to bring the subdivision up to
' a more liveable standard. I would therefore appreciate your
cooperation in arranging for a thorough sweeping of these streets
in the near future. This might even be looked at as a gesture of
' good will prior to our upcoming meeting with the neighborhood
concerning the driveway access issue.
' Sincerely,
CITY 0 CHANHASSEN
i►
G. G. Warren, P.E.
' • ineer
GGW:ktm
c: Scott Harr , Asst. Public Safety Director
1111
I
Ice inc- - "va
Metropolitan Waste Control Comission
Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
612 222-8423
May 30, 1989
Mayor Don Chmiel
' City of Chanhassen
690 Coulter Drive, Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Mayor Chmeil:
In follow-up to the series of three public hearings which the
' Metropolitan Waste Control Commission held to receive public
comment on our draft Implementation Plan, I have attached for
your information a copy of our responses to public concerns .
' This document summarizes the public comments received and our
response to the public input . The response document has been
forwarded to the Metropolitan Council, along with our draft
' Implementation Plan, for their review and approval .
I want to thank you again for taking your time to review our Plan,
attend our public hearings, and provide us with further insights
' regarding your concerns and observations . Our Board of Commis-
sioners will be asked to grant final approval of the Implementation
Plan upon completion of the review process by the Metropolitan
' Council . We anticipate that we will be able to provide you with
a copy of the final Implementation Plan in late summer or early fall.
If you have questions or concerns in the interim, please do not
hesitate to contact our Chair, Lurline Baker-Kent ( 229-2097 or
me (229-2099) .
Sincerely,
0
1
' Gordon Voss
Chief Administrator
' GV:JP
Attachment
' CC: Commissioner
GV15
' JUN 21989
+,l I Y OF CHANHASSEN
•
� L PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE
`k COMMISSION' S IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
EXPRESSED CONCERNS AND RESPONSES
Public Hearing at Hennepin Technical Center ' s South Campus , Eden
Prairie, Minnesota, 7 : 45 a.m. , Wednesday, April 26 , 1989 .
1 . Mr . Larry Thompson , City of Farmington, was concerned about the
Implementation Plan addressing the sewer service needs of Apple
Valley, Farmington, , Lakeville and Rosemount adequately in terms
of realistic growth projections and adequate facilities . It was
noted that Rosemount was not included as contributing to the
Empire plant . '
A process exists for individual communities to discuss problems
with growth projections with the Council to have appropriate
changes made. In the case of Lakeville, this was recently done
and growth projections for the city were changed significantly
by the Council .
The wastewater flow projections on page 192 of the Implementation
Plan for the Empire Plant reflect revised flows for , the City of
Lakeville. As a result , the next expansion of the Empire Plant , II beyond the ongoing one, has been accelerated about five years , to
begin in the year 2001 (see Table 3-20 on page 154 of the
Implementation Plan) .
The existing metropolitan interceptor system in the Empire Plant
service area has been completed. The _Empire Plant is being I
expanded 50% in capacity with substantial completion of the expan-
sion scheduled by the end of 1991 . Consequently, the Empire
Plant service area will be affected by the accuracy of wastewater I
flow projections only to the degree that the Empire Plant will
have to be expanded again sooner if growth projections are too
low. Commission staff monitor flows on an on-going basis to
insure facility upgrades meet service needs .
Mr . Thompson is correct that a portion of the flow from the City
of Rosemount goes now to the Empire Plant , but is not included in
flow projections for the plant . This contribution of less than
1% of total flow to Empire will be included in future flow
projections .
2 . Mr . Thompson was also interested in seeing incentives/
disincentives for satisfactory infiltration/inflow ( I/I) control
measures by the Commission in the Implementation Plan for the II
metropolitan interceptors owned by the Commission.
Under Objective C-3 on page 133 of the draft Implementation Plan, I
infiltration/inflow problems in interceptors will be identified as
part of a systematic, continuous , long-term inspection program to
identify rehabilitation/replacement needs . Implementation will be '
carried out in a rehabilitation program estimated to cost $350
million by the year 2010 .
1
•
The ongoing operation and maintenance of the interceptor system
also includes identifying and correcting problem areas , including
I/I related problems . About $100 million in rehabilitation and
' replacement of older sewers has , or will , deal with I/I problems
in Commission interceptors . Mention of the Commission ' s systematic
inspection programs , as described under Objective C-.3 , will be
' added to the text for Objective A-6 which relates to I/I reduction
by communities .
3 . Mr . Jim Robinette, representing the City of Lakeville, commented
that growth projections for the City of Lakeville used in the
Empire Plant design were too low in the City' s opinion.
' As previously discussed, the planning for the Empire Plant used
the latest growth and flow projections for the City of Lakeville,
as recently revised following meetings and discussion between the
City and the Metropolitan Council .
The Commission must use the Metropolitan Council growth
' projections-as do the communities . The ongoing expansion of the
Empire Plant will provide adequate service for about 10 years,
based on flow projections . If the flow projections are too low,
then the plant will be expanded sooner than presently planned.
' With planned review of actual conditions in the future, it will be
possible to ensure that the next expansion will be timed to meet
the needs of the communities served.
4 . Mr . Gary Warren , representing the City of Chanhassen, was inter-
, ested in the possibility that the Commission could establish a
' technology center of some sort to serve as a resource in assisting
the individual communities in identifying , assessing, and develop-
ing corrective measures in the area of I/I control in community
sewers .
' The idea is a good one in terms of assuring that effective and
economical correction of I/I is achieved where it is excessive.
The Commission staff will modify the Implementation Plan to note
that options for a two-way sharing of technical knowledge and
experience will be explored.
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
•
•
•
PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE -
COMMISSION' S IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
EXPRESSED CONCERNS AND RESPONSES
Written Communications Commenting on the Draft Implementation Plan
1 . Letter of May 1 , 1989 from Mr . Eugene A. Dietz , Director of Public
Works , City of Eden Prairie. '
Concerns :
Mr . Dietz comments that the flow projections for Eden Prairie on I
page 192 of the Implementation Plan are not the latest figures and
should be corrected. He advocates that any reconveyance approach
for Commission facilities to a community not require purchase of
the facility since acquired maintenance of the facility represents
burden enough. He recognizes the need for an I/I control program
for communities in the metropolitan system, but feels that legis-
lation may be necessary to effectively implement an adequate
program.
Response: '
The flow projections in the Implementation Plan do not represent
the latest projections approved by the Metropolitan Council . The
latest figures will be included in the final plan .
Under Objective A-2 on page 53 of the Implementation Plan, the I
approach to reconveying unnecessary metropolitan interceptors is
provided. Interceptor facilities recommended for reconveyance at
this time under the Plan are listed in Table 3-1 on page 54 . It I
is the intent of the approach to receive reasonable value for the
facilities ; consequently, there will generally be a charge. The
approach taken is designed to comply with the requirements of the I
Metropolitan Council ' s Policy Plan regarding interceptor reconvey-
ance.
2 . Letter of April 19 , 1989 from Mr . ,Wallace Abrahamson, Mayor of the I
City of Stillwater .
Concerns : '
Mr . Abrahamson is concerned that Stillwater growth and wastewater
flow projections agree with the latest figures accepted by the II
Metropolitan Council . He also feels that Objective A-6 in the
Implementation Plan should consider using the reduced costs of
treatment due to I/I to in some way assist communities in financ-
ing
the cost of I/I reduction measures .
Response:
The concerns and issues provided in writing by Mr . Abrahamson
represent those presented by Mr Steve Russell on behalf of the
City of Stillwater at the public hearing in Maplewood on April 19 , II
1989 .
•
The responses to Mr . Abrahamson' s concerns are therefore provided
' in detail under items 3 ) and 4 ) of the document recapping concerns
and responses from the public hearing held on April 19 , 1989 at
Maplewood.
3 . Letter of April 26 , 1989 from Mr . Ronald J. Stahlberg, City
Engineer for the City of Lino Lakes .
' Concerns :
' Mr . Stahlberg presents a follow-up letter to his testimony at
the public hearing in Maplewood relative to concerns that the
capacity of the system serving southern Lino Lakes was going to be
reached based on growth projections of the City and a project
' should be included in the Implementation Plan to ensure adequate
sewer service for the City.
Response :
The response to the letter is provided in the response to his
testimony at Maplewood.
1
1
1
1
i
CITY OF
Ci . ANBASSEN
•
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
June 21 . 1989
State of Minnesota
' Attn: Mr. Thomas Motherwav
State Coordinating Officer
Department of Public Safety
' Division of Emergency Management
B5-State Capitol
St. Paul , MN 55155
' Re: FEMA - Final Accounting
Request for Reimbursement
' Dear Mr. Motherway:
Attached herewith are the City of Chanhassen ' s Project Listing
' forms for our categorical grant for disaster No. 0797. All projects
were actually completed before the February 2, 1989, deadline,
however, our Finance Department chose to complete the 1988 Annual
Audit and Financial Statement preparation before finalizing the
' project costs.
If there are any questions on the attached material , please call .
' Sincerely,
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
YNN
I GiGa Jarren , P.E.
- • =ineer
1 GGW:jm
Attachments: Project Listing Forms and Certification
cc : Don Ashworth, City Manager
Jim Chaffee. Public Safety Director
Tom Chaffee, Data Processing Coordinator
City Council Administrative Packet (6-26-89)
I
FEDERAL EMERGENCY NANAOEMENT AGENCY '4ac: I
PROJEC: LISTING
DISASTER a: 0797 •
1
sA
P.A. ID: 019-10915 APPLICANT: CHANHASSEN, CITY OF
STATE: MINNESOTA GRANT
'FIFE: Cli4tLKILHI r
• WORK PROJECT APPROVED ACTUAL DT AMT. CLAIMED
DSR SUPP CAT ACCOMP BY CDMPL OT DSR AMOUNT ,
- COMPLETED BY APPLICANT COMMENTS
11109 0 A FORCE ACCT 021441BB $640.04 _ I ! 3 r / �u A!! (o S f_ ...,,I•E
xs` pier- F ,-- -
PROJECT TITLE: SEDIMENTS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY
-r?z
DAMAGE FACILITY: PUBLIC PROPERTY - ..
,,I cI
DAMAGE LOCATION: SITES :S, 40, 43 & 44
PROJ DESCRIPTION: (665 i 6 X 2?117 = ^ FLOOD DEBRIS :-..,-;',.7;
t95. L J BRIS ,RO;I: , SAND, GRAVEL, LOGS) WAS ' ' >
DEPOSITED ON ROADS, IN PARKS, BUILDINGS AND OTHER PUBLIC PROPERTY. `"
CF,sV ; L
VE DEBRIS AND HAUL TO DISPOSAL SITE.
COMMEN'S: _
DEBRIS AT SITES 35,40 & 44 ARE MINOR ;:EFGSITS AMOUNTING TO LESS THAN$250 EAC4. ALLOW SITE 43 IN KIOWA PARK.
I1110 0 A FORCE ACCT !2/04iBB $I,200.00 �_i_f / 5_yf /(7,e6 //IJEtK des ,{/E,NTPd
..4;.1:4c 'i°' '
PROJECT TITLE: DEBRIS AT BRIDGES
III
GAUGE FACILITY: DRAINAGE WAY
DAMAGE LOCATION: S OF E LAKE DR SITE $41
PRO j DES;+ iFi:ON: 65' d 20' X DEBRIS CONS_STINS
OFF ROCK, SAND, TREES. STUMPS AND
OTHER MATERIAL IS SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCING THE WATERWAY OPENING. REMOVE
DEBRIS AND HALL FROM SITE.
11111 0 A FORCE ACCT 02104/85 3750.00 30 g 7; 760
I
PROJECT TITLE; MAN MADE CHANNEL CLEARANCE
DAMAGE FACILITY: DRAINAGE WAY
DAMAGE LOCATION: HORR - S LOTUS LAKE SITE 442
FROJ DESCRIPTION: (337 X 6 X 21/27 = 150 CY. FLOODWATERS DEPOSITED SEDIMENTS IN THE
CHANNEL WHICH SIGNIFICANTLY ;EDUCES' CHANNEL CAPACITY. EXCAVATE
SEDIMENTS AND DEPOSIT MATERIAL IN SPOIL BANK AT SITE WHERE POSSIBLE.
. THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF DEBRIS IS COMaUTED TG
C P' ETELf CLEAN CHANNEL TO E ±D::I GN GRADE. ��C APPLICANT'S SHARE IS DEM
FROM THE TOTAL WHERE
APPLU2ABLE.
1 1
1
``` :a EP..... .�:i a�-x`t -`•!a 'i @�."`y9s~. •'mow. s
4
'
I _ PAGE: 2
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
PROJECT LISTING
-- , DISASTER 4: 0797
I P,A. ID: 010-10918 APPLICANT: CHANHASS[N, CITY CF ~-
STATE: HINNEETA GRANT TYPE: CATEGORICAL
I ' NORK PRUJ[C? A;PkOY[D ACTUAL 0T AM7 CLAI�D
DSR 0 SUPP CAT ACCOMP BY C0MPL UT
DSR AMOUNT COMPLETED BY AMT.
COMMENTS
~==
ACCT...1164J 0 A FORCE CT /
.02/O4/88 ' .. �5l5.00 �� ,1, �
/� $ 5.76 .1.71=- '
`
' ^� � . .�
I '' DAMAGE FACILITY: BOAT LANDING AREA
DAMAGE LOCATION: S LOTUS 9K - SECTION 12 SITE 414 -
P8OJ DESCRIPTION: 220CY. FLOOD WATER CAUSED DEBRIS (SILT) TO COVER BOAT LANDING AREA -
I REMOVE.
12151 0 A FORCE ACCT 08/23/87 $348.0O fi/ �i/_S.1 $ .3Y ��-
I .^
PROJECT TITLE: WIND GENERATED DEBRIS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY
'' ' DAMAGE FACILITY: STORM SEWER DRAINAGE WAY
DAMAGE LOCATION: E OF KEK8ER F0 #28 . ~
��
PROJ DESC;{P7IOW: SCATTERED 45 CY. WIND GENERATED DEBRIS CONSISTING OF BUILDING
MATERIALS. 'REFS AND PERSONAL PROPERTY OAS DEPOSITED ON PUBLIC
I FROPE�T,. L�AS AN� APIA E[6R�� 70 DISPOSAL SITE.SlTE •
11615 j 8 FORCE ACCT �8/l7/87 1<,3O �� //� /��/� / ��~� -��'
. - _- _- '
I ^.'`.., �.. � |
�^r'' ^ R0JECTTJTLE: PUNFlNGOP[RATlON
.' DAMAGE FACILITY: 14� PUMP STATIONS '
I r � DAHAGE LOCA7[3N: �OUGHOUT C[`Y
. ' PR0J DESCRIPTION: N/A DIMENSIONS. ATTENTION REDClREO DURING STORM TO ANSWER HIGH WATER
' ALARM CALLS - TO RESET TRIP OUT SWlTCK[S, RENT FLUSHER.
I ,
' "\ ` `^
.11642 -O
8 FORCE ACCT T 0017/87 $2,:21.n0 -.i-'-{-7,-^-~r$ g'3,9 / /i-. ‘..'. - ' ' CONTRACT
I ~` P��C �DE: �0E�lY[ ���B�
DAMAGE FACILITY: CITY
DAMAGE LOCATION: CITY WIDE
I �0 ��k{��� CI7Y ��. �0�TlVE XE��B MEASURES.
I
I .
-
I '
'
, . -
II
71
PAGE: 3 I/
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
PROjECT LISTING
DISASTER 4: 0797
•
P.A. ID: 419-10916 APPLICANT: C 41HASSEU. CITY OF
STATE: MINNESOTA GRANT TYPE: CATEGORICAL ;q
• WORK PROJECT APPROVED ACTUAL DT AMT. CLAIMED" N• U
DSR 4 SUPP CAT ACCO'1P BY CONPL DT -% DSR AMOUNT COMPLETED BY APPLICANT COMMENTS '
J .= = - y� • ' -+4 .!/647 B FOR GE ACCT 0B/23I„7 y., ` $343.00 _ . /331% s I
"'' ' PROJECT TITLE: EMERGENCY PUMPING
DAMAGE FACILITY: LIFT STATION 411
DAMAGE LOCATION: 7110 UTICA LANE SITE 429
I
PROJ DESCRIPTION: ONE STATION. FLOOD WATERS ENTERED STATION PIT - EMERGENCY PUMPING
REQUIRED TO PROTECT FACILITY.
.::1104 ''0 C FORCE ACCT 02/03189 3462.00 //-l3C i 7 3 [lO tom, /I?A fer,'4 L e s f s I 4^
--1„, CONTRACT "tier' es-/e/en
a DAMAGE FACILITYY: STREET
DAMAGE LOCATION: KING PD - SW SEC 5 SITE 41 '.
PROD •E CRIP = 27 _
:• . R iiL!il: 1735' t ,'�';/* 1,;. , '% (60' X 12' .►'. �Y}% ; - 8 CY WASHOUT. FLOOD
WATERS WASHED CPF 16 TONS OF SURFACE MATEYIAL. RESTORE AGGREGATE.
REGGDDE - APPLY ?1 LY CALC__ CHLORIDE. I
11604 0 C FORCE ACT 0E117 $299.o• Ill 7/ 0 7$__;72.,_
: .,: I
' • DAMAGE FACILITY: CITY ROAD
. _,_F DAMAGE LOCATION: NEAR 43900 HWY CO 47 SITE $3I `
PROP DESCRIPTION: (42' X 9' X .33'1/27 = 10.12 CY. WASHED OUT - REPLACE WITH 3/4' I
>} AGGREGATE.
11631 0 C FORCE ACCT 02/03/89 $1,555.00 9 ;l7( 77$ /6ao .5"0- /NeG,-rd o -led I
iv
..4-7 k;10 Tyre 2/7--
`PROJECT TITLE: BITUMINO+US SURFACE AND EMBAh RENT FAILURE
DAMAGE FACILITY: CITY RD I
DAMAGE LOCATION: YOSEMITE RD MAP SITE 4:
PROJ DES:PIoTI_N: I50 .Y 25 X 41/27 = 222 CY PILL s, 34 ( 6 i = 224. ?
. PAVEMENT HAS I
WASHED OUT AND FAILED. SUBGRADE AND DITCHES SCOURED. REMOVE AND
REPLACE DAMAGED PAVEMENT AND BASE COURSE AND REPLACE LOST EMBANKMENT.
WHERE APPLICABLE, RREORADE DITCH SECTIONS.
1
1
t.
` Y i •. . - li t S b
i
CAGE: 4
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MA?•AG='EN} AGENCY -
PROJECT LISTING
DISASTER 0757
P.A. ID: 019-10312 " FL IC "NHA S" N, CITY OF
STATE: Mi NESOTA GRANT TYPE: CATEGORICAL
• WORK PROJECT APPROVED ACTUAL OT AMT. CLAIMED
DSR { SUPP CAT ACCOMP BY CONK 31 DSR AMOUNT COMPLETED BY APPLICANT COMMENTS
11639 0 C FORCE ACCT 06/23/97 32,657.00 ?!_2y1 4 7 $ 7-
PROJECT TITLE: GRAYL VEL ROAD O
WASHOUT
DAMAGE FACILITY: GRAVEL ROAD
DAMAGE LOCATION: LOTUS TRAIL - N 1/2 SEC 31 SITE 437
PROD DESCRIPTION: (440' X 12' X 6')127 = 98 CY. FLOOD WATERS WASHED OUT ROAD SURFACE -
RESTORE. APPLY CALCIUM CHORI;E.
11640 0 C FORCE ACCT 02/03/69 ;624.00 /1 ;301 S7 $ a�
PROJECT TITLE: ROAD SURFACE TREATMENT
DAMAGE FACILITY: GRAVEL ROAD
DAMAGE LOCAiICN: SUNSET TRAIL - NW SEC 2. SITE 42:
' DESCRIPTION:'
r"unL 11700 FT ). 20'I14 a 7,7'5 ` . FLHO WATERS Y7NJrtD ROAD SURFACE
D:151-�"Y '+. ' RECE TLi Nom,. UM n n
.I•� _.! _,:. vA�_.:: LHL_RIDt. 'GRADE AND RESTORE.
11644 0 ri 1Lt ACCT 06/23/57 ;61 ;; f /�v 7 3 /9
CONTRACT , ..,
PROJECT TITLE: BITUMINOUS WASHOUT
DAMAGE FACILITY: EITU1IN'U3 ROAD
DAMAGE LOCATION: DAKOTA L4 - E 1;2 SECTION 13 SITE 20
PRCJ DESCRIPTION: 120 X 10 .25. FLOOD DESTROYED BITUMINOUS SURFACE -
RESTORE.
'11646 0 C FORCE ACCT 06/23/67 $276."00 gip_:A� 'S 7 $ .P&. ,. -r
DAMAGE FACILITY: GRAVEL ROAD
DAMAGE LOCATION: TONA000NA DR - NW SECTION 49 SITE 434
PROD DESCRIPTION: 76' X 12' X 4' = 12 CY. FLOOD WASHED OFF SURFACE - RESTORE MATERIAL -
GRADE SURFACE
11574 - 0 C FORCE ACCT 08117;57 34,072.0 5i/7. '�./ 3 �D.7,- 7
CONTRACT
DAMAGE FFACILITY: GRAVEL ROAD
DAMAGE LOCATION: BLUFF CREEK DR SITE *26
PROD DESCRIPTION: 1360' .0 12' X 6'1//27 = 6 CY. FLOOD WATERS WASIEO OUT ROAD SURFACE.
RESTORE ROAD - APPLY CALCIUM CHLORIDE.
•
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY YAEE'
PROJECT LISTING
DISASTER t: 07R7
P.H. 12: 019-1C'915 APPLICANT: CHANHASSEN. CITY OF
STATE: MINNESOTA N_
GR=d TYPE: CATEGORICAL
' WORK PRCJ_CT APPROVED ACTUAL DT AMT. CLAIMED
DSR * SUPP CAT ACCOMP BY CUNPL DT '
T DSk AMOUNT COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
- --- ---------- COMMENTS
:1555.... 0 C 08/23/87 :.. $8.592.'00 1 iLl/g7 $ �'S9a
DAMAGE FACILITY: CITY STREET
DAMAGE LOCATION: SITE 424 CREKWODD DR NW SECTION 36
PROJ DESCRIPTION: (4200 X !2 X 11/27 = 1566CY - (28' X 12' X 3°1/27 = 3 CY BITUMINOUS.
FLOOD WASHED OUT SHOULDER AND ROAD SURFACE. RESTORE.
11686 0 C FORCE ACCT 08/17/87 qtr 3�7-,9i 0 a //7/37 $__3ci/
-- -
PROJECT TITLE: CITY ROAD WASHOUT •
' DAMAGE FACILITY: CITY ROAD
DAMAGE LOCATION: 7051 CARVER BEACH RD SITE x32 •
PPOJ DESCRIFT!CN: ( 1 X 1 _ 14.72 rr
L, 27 4 . ,i=•uD SURFACE• , `L,�
I' X 4-}/ Y WASH OUT - RES7KF,
12!32 0 C 02/C2/29 . , S .75"do //vcJEcN1ec(
it
PROJECT TITLE: RE !urit WALL (RETAINING:
DAMAGE FACILITY: RETAINING WALL
.. DAMAGE LOCATION: PLEASANT VIEW COVE SITE 436
PROJ DESCRIPTION: WALL 72 X 6 X E . SLICE AREA „ 5 1 W T F
•5 CAUSED
EMBANK?ENT TO SLIDE DESTROYING RETAINING 44LL - ,
,EJ:unE
11105 0 D FORCE ACCT 002/03/59 $1,0 2. r /O l/0 //3 /A∎CL t IP$ Eeti d
/e
•
-., PROJECT TITLE: LEVEE DAMAGE I'
.4;- 'DAMAGE FACILITY: DRAINAGE WAY
DAMAGE LOCATION: HUGHE'S DRAINAGE WAY 7343 WILOW030 SITE 440
PROJ DESCRIPTION: (210 X 5 X 21/27 = 76 CY. HIG(WATER DAMAGED LEVEE. RESTORE LEVEE -0
ORIGINAL CROSS SECTION WITH COMPACTED FILL. GRADE AND RESEED
' APFLICABL
DIST;;RiED y4Eh . '9 F,
=.0
-ah-
.
FEDERAL EM_SSENCY HANAGEIIENt AGENCY
PROJECT LISTING
DISASTER #: 9797
—
P.A. ID: 019-10913 APPLICANT: CHANHASSEN. CITY OF
STATE: NINN SOTA GRANT TYPE:E. Ch1:O
CRiCi
• WORK PROJECT APPROVED ACTUAL DT AMT. CLAIMED
DSR s SUPP CAT ACCDMP BY CPR DT DSR AMOUNT COMPLETED BY APPLICANT COMMENTS
11107 0 D FORCE ACCT 02/03/G9 - $1,472.00 l 1 y 1 Q7 $ /5z 7 l4"c L ud's oeew ic°d
PROJECT TITLE: STORM DRAINAGE WASHOUT
DAMAGE FACILITY: STORM DRAINAGE
DAMAGE LOCATIO N: FRONTIER TRAIL DRAINAGE
WAY
PROJ DESCRIPTION: (129 X 17 X 1)127 = 81 CY TOTAL. FLOOD WATERS WASHED OUT A CITY
DRAINAGE WAY. RESTORE.
11638 0 0 FORCE ACCT 4123187 $2=2.00 ti 1/31 ri F e?
PROJECT TITLE: RESTORE BANK SLIDE
DAMAGE FACILITY: POND EMBANKMENT
DAMAGE LOCATION: E OF Kr.r.66R RD SITE E # 9
PROJ DES:RIPTION: .Sti X 12 X 11;27 = 22 C FL 'D WATER WASHED OUT EMBANKMENT -
RESTtO":_. /�
1::75 0 0 FORCE ACCT 12/03/59 492ij 0 0 Imo,' /4 'Q7 j I /✓
PROJECT TITLE: WATER WAY WASHOUT
• DAMAGE FACILITY: PAWNEE DRAINAGE
DAMAGE LOCATION: PAWNEE DRAINAGE WAY NE SECTION OF CITY MAP SITE #38
' PROJ st:L 1PTION: (20 X 10 .1 41127 = 30 CV & 30 X 150 = 500 EY. FLOOD WATERS WASHED OUT
CLAY AREA WITH GRASS SURFACE - RESTORE.
11676 0 0 FORCE ACCT 02/07/G9 $2,526.00 lP !/1 $ ,P.T2o
---,PROJECT•PROJECT TITLE: EROSION REPAIR AT DRAINAGE AND OUTLET STRUCTURES
••••'DAMAGE FACILITY: MWCC DRAINAGE WAY
DAMAGE LOCATION: S OF E LA _ OP MAP SITE €41
PROJ DESCRIPT ION: 60 X 14 X 5 = 156 CY (TOTAL). HIGH VELOCITY =LOW SCLPED
FROM ?EHIND DRAINAGE OF OUTLET STRUCTURES. BACKFILL ERODED AREA TO
ORIGINAL CROSS SECTION.
•• Y-
/1
FAG':
EMEttGE'iCY MANAFP7Ni AGENCY
PROJECT LISTING
DISASTER 4: 0777
P.A. ID: 019-10913 APPLICANT: CHANHASSEN. CI-Y OF
,
FATE: 41IMEGOTA GRANT TYPE: CATEGORICAL '
• WORK PROJECT , APPROVED ACTUAL DT ANT. CLAIMED
DSR SURF CAT ACCDW BY COMPL DT DSR AMOUNT COMPLETED BY APPLICANT COMMENTS
_
a-
2 $ YRO . ;;;-
11677 0 D FORCE ACCT -V //10/
2/03/89 $2.260.00 _
çw i xkt
.„ .
—PROJECT TITLE: EROSION REPAIR AT DRAINAGE AND CUTLET STRUCTURES
-
:-
DAMAGE FACILITY: HORR DRAINAGE WAY
DAMAGE LOCATION: NPR - LOTUS • SITE 442
PROJ DESCRIPTION: (260 X B X 21/27 = 154 CY. HIGH VELOCITY FLOW SCOURED MATERIAL FROM •-.
BEHIND DRAINAGE OR OUTLET STRUCTURES. BACKFIIL ERODED AREA TO
ORIGINAL CROSS SECTION.
•
11108 0 F FORCE ACCT 08117187 1690.JO 1//7; q7#
CONTRACT
•
PROJECT TITLE: LIGHTNING DAMAGE
DAMAGE FACILITY: ELECTRIC CONTROL FAN;;
CAMAGE LOCATIA: LIFT STATION #I2 - 3:50 Lk RIDGE FLO
PROJ 4' X 3' X 10n. LIGHTNINS STRUCY. CONTROL PANEL - ;PAIR STARTER
MIRO, - PUMP WATER CUT IF STATION.
#0,--
11672 0 F FORCE ACCT 02/03/89 $1,409.0 //3 $
..
PROJECT TITLE: STORM SENER OUTLET WASHOUT
DAMAGE FACILITY: STORM SEWER OUTLET
DAMAGE LOCATION: HIDDEN VALLEY POND - SITE 421
PROJ DESCRIPTION: (40 X 20 X 71/27 207 CY TOTAL. FLOOD WATERS WASHED CUT FILL AT GASE
OF SEWER OUTLET.
• 11673 0 F FORCE ACCT 02/03/39 $2,573.00 /0
PROJECT TITLE: BASIN WASHOUT
DAMAGE Mar,: STORM DRAINAGE BASIN
DAMAGE LOCATION: TRIPLE CROWN POND SITE i?
PROJ DESCRIPTION: (12) ( 12 ( 4)/27 = 213 CY - TOTAL. FLOOD WATERS WASHED OUT MATERIALS
OF LEVEES AT DRAINACE BASIN - IN STORM SEWER SYSTEM - RESTORE.
4 c --
•
• 4
PAGE: G
FEDERAL _MERSENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
PROJECT
•
DISASTER 4: 0797
P.4, ID: 019-10418 AP`I I"A NT: CL:ANP SSEN :IT C
:IT; U
STATE: ?:INNES_TA u_'r,C�
RAN I T TYPE: CA.t i '
G• _
WORK PROJECT APPROVED ACTUAL DT AMT. CLAIMED
DER * SUPP CAT ACCOMP BY CO=PL DT DSR AMOUNT COMPLETED BY APPLICANT COMMENTS
•
, oc
11532 0 F FORCE ACCT 08/17/B7 $9,960.00 7 I zJ I gl $ 7760
CONTRACT
PROJECT TITLE: BROKEN WATER HAIN
DAMAGE FACILITY: SANITARY SEWAGE LINE
DANASE LOCATION: 3305 SHORE DRIVE - IIFT STATION 45
PROD utz,,tiIPT ON: FLOOD WA.trL, L•AUSED A BROKEN FORCE MAIN AT LIFT STATION - REPAIR.
1151: 0 F CONTRACT 238 _ i 7
PROJE_' TITLE: CONTROLLER DAMAGE
DAIAGE FACILITY: LIFT STATION 471
DAMAGE LOCATION: TRAPPPEF FAD_ - SITE 47
PROJ DESCRIPTION: ONE UNIT, LIGHTN!N& STRUCK CONTROLIER UNIT ON 7i7_3:37. RESTORE.
:lip 0 F rCt'.= COT 088/17(37 $457.)0 S7_,17/S-7
CONTRACT
PROJ CT TITLE: BROKEN POWER LINE
C "AGE FACILI-7: LIFT STATION
DAMAGE
A"A -.. � LOCATION; SEC 12 - CITY SITE 412
FROJ DESCRIPTION: ONE ELECTRIC LINE. WINDS FELL TREE ACROSS LINE - BROKE WIRES.
RES'ORE ELECTRICAL POWER - RENO4E YIATER FROM STATION.
121510 0 F FORCE ACCT 02/03/89 *7,072.30 1/ ':20:q.7 r �S�o t c £ ides 4,0.11
CONTRACT - -- �7 u CI ire e".v 7-
PROJECT TITLE: STORM DRAINAGE WASHOUT
DAMAGE FACILITY: STORK SEWER DRAINAGE WAY
DAMAGE LOCATION: C OF KERBER RD SITE t23
PROD DESCRIPTION: (1200 X 6 X 4):27 = C 1067 v TOTAL. -
b O AL. :B STOR1 SEWER iNP9c0LiNiE TO
'
ARRY FLOOD W
CAERRS. WATERS WA_NEO OUT !ATE L
` RiN Sr?DYL THE SEWER LINE.
RESTORE - SEWER WAS NOT PLUGGED.
GRAND Ti-AL: f_di/ y9G-#.--
$60.59.3.00
32 TOTAL DSR(S)
•
FEDERAL EM'E;EENCY MANABENE.MT AGENCY RASE:
PROVE_ L:STING
DISASTER g: 0797
P.A. ID: 019-10915 AM:PLICANT: CHANHA_SEN, CITY 5F
STATE: MINNESOTA GRANT TYPE. CATEGORICAL
•
INSTRU:TIONS t
FSjLONINS COMPLETION OF ALL NORM', COMPLETE THE LAST THREE COLUMNS, THE Gt'..R
AND :ETURN THIS SHEET TO: TiFICATION, --_
' ..,. THOMAS NCTHERWAY `
DIt%ISIDN OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
ROOM 9-5, STATE CAPITOL
ST. PAUL
•
MN 55101
•
ATTN: JOHN KERR
15 DCCUM=1'4TION MUST FE ATTACHED WHEN"`_
_ i.=�' .' AMOUNT ((���y// ... _1.cYC:- YOUR i.LA::"• FOR =�N I!iDI� IDi±AL PROJECT
E cz THE AI PROVED CSR AMOUNT DR $25 'J I�:.0 . - PO UM`" 1�
��="BILE=� ;. ,.. N AND .- -IC?i �� 1 == - •`'' MUST INCLUDE A
CH.DC4 A D DESC,RIFi O. CLAIMED N!r'F. ZND CCST A1, NY ATTACHMENT;
'NAT NAY SE NFCF TO S - r?.. TriE' ATTt,CH:"rT4
SE _ESSARY TO :,;�F CRT YOLP CLAIM.
CER IF.Cy ION
I HERE:,' CERTIFY THAT TO THE BEST F A.
ESi OF :,Y M. _�tLEioE 4'9D _ELiE` ALL 45RK CLAIMFD
ARE -L- ISL= - ^
t IS I,1 ACCCRs�ANC_ WITH 'HE GRANT N DITIGN, O . ., ,
� - �i 4i.ii�1 t:, ALL +?OR;°. CLAIMED HAS ::EEN L�it� t:��1
AND ALL :;�:i5 _LAO 'AVE SEEN PAID IN FULL.
L' _ ,
A -
EIGNED:
, • DATE; Zt_ _2;01
APP; AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ---
c c 1,0,c4 _ ,c/
Twin Cities Regional Cable Channel, Inc.
6900 Winnetka Avenue North
Brooklyn Park, MN 55428
IJune 19, 1989 (612) 533-1736
I Mr. Don Ashworth
City of Chanhassen
690 Coulter Drive
PO Box 147
I
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Dear Don:
IIPreparation of budgets is now upon us and we have received
several calls from various Commission's inquiring about contribu-
tions towards the support of Regional Channel 6 for 1990.
IIWhy is it in the interest of Cities and Cable Commission's to
support the Regional Channel?
I .
* The Regional Channel serves as an incentive and reward
to local producers as many of their programs appear on
Ithe channel where they reach over 300, 000 homes.
* A strong Regional Channel programmed by major metro
organizations benefiting those organizations will
I
translate into political and legal support for public
access and will help preserve public access for
individuals and small organizations.
I * Good local programs which appear on the Regional Channel
benefit subscribers as well as producers which helps to
I develop broad based support for public access. Subscri-
bers, the source of franchise fees, deserve good local
programs and the Regional 'Channel can help provide them.
I The TCRCC Board of Directors greatly appreciates the City of
Chanhassen's financial contribution this year of $500. We would
•
like to encourage the City of Chanhassen to once again favorably
I consider us when preparing budget$.
Again, we thank you for your support and ongoing involvement
. toward Regional Channel 6.
Sincerely,
I "JO,/ dpizzik...--/
' Gay L. Jacobson, Coordinator
Twin Cities Regional Cable Channel, Inc.
Greg Moore
Icc:
jfis.-. t lv t:.l)
I JUN 211989
CITY OF CHANHASSEN :,,
-_f . ., - ,
I
i ;„ CITY OF cc.. R..„..„4 ..... ,t4J--
1; \ ' cHANBAssEN
,
„,
i
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
I (612) 937-1900
1 Action by City Administrator
MEMORANDUM Endorsed v
ramified
I , RejecteL
DATE: June 21, 1989 Date
Date Submitted to Commissar
1 TO: All Department Heads
Date Sr'—. _,i to Council
FROM: Jean Meuwissen, Treasurer Q ' 7lf
I 0 f. "
SUBJECT: Late Payment of Invoices
The 1988 Annual Financial Report and audit process have been
I completed by the City Auditors and we have once again been chastised
for non-compliance of MN Statute 471. 425 , subdivisions 2 and 4 which
require timely payment (within 35 days of receipt of invoice) or
1 payment of interest on late payments.
In an effort to obtain full compliance, the Finance Department will
I begin monitoring invoice dates and start paying interest in accor-
dance with the aforementioned Statute. The late payment
penalty/interest will be separately :accounted for and charged to the
1 budget of the department responsible for the delay in payment.
Beginning in 1988 and continuing in "1989 the Finance Department has
been processing accounts payable regularly for each Council meeting
I thus providing ample opportunity for timely payment of all bills
rendered.
IThe only exception to this policy and in accordance with MN Statute
will be if there is a dispute over specific items on a bill and it is
properly documented. -
I
I
I
U
II
4�
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
i690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
1
1
June 26, 1989
1
1 Mrs. Doris Larson
7301 Laredo Drive
Chanhassen, MN 55317
1 Dear Mrs. Larson:
Attached is the check for $200 for your participation in the
1 Chanhassen Curbside Recycling Program. It was exciting to have a
winner of our recycling prize drawing and we greatly appreciate
your taking the time to participate in our recycling effort.
1 Congratulations!
Sincerely,
1 . m,7.-r ? C . -i
1 Jo Ann Olsen
Senior Planner
JO:v
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
t
d '
I
I
STATE BANK OF CHANHASSEN
iiii
CHANHASSEN,MN 032478 I
75-1458/919
1 ca Alt THIS INSTRUMENT WHEN SIGNED BY THE CITY
�4B r'+%* THE ORDER OF THE PAYEE NAMED FOR THE AMOUNT TREASURER SHALL BECOME A CHECK PAYABLE TO
STATED.
1 VOID AFTER 90 DAYS FROM DATE OF CHECK
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147
CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 AMOUNT DATE
*$200.00 6-21-89 . _1
1
Two Hundred and no/100ths
• PAY TO
I ORDER OF: Doris Larson -
7301 Laredo Drive
Chanhassen, MN 55317 � � t
■
MAYOR
, 79Afy,[5:.;7, '72-4e.i.de.ii,
•EASURER OR MANAGER
II'03247811' 1:091.9L45B7I: 09 0 L 6t1'
I
CITY OF CHANHASSEN REMITTANCE ADVICE PLEASE DETACH BEFORE CASHING
690 COULTER DR.,CHANHASSEN,MN 55317
I
I
I
211-4375 $200.00 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t2/
°°E.H".E" C c_ 1.2 c.,c k ,L f 0",-t-
' °°"E.°° "I""E,°""
Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District
/ ,.
u�
s�
' o Engineering Advisor Barr Engineering Co.
7803 Glenroy Road
" �. ° Minneapolis, MN 55435
I830-0555
Legal Advisor: Popham, Haik, Schnobrich&Kaufman
3300 Piper Jaffrey Tower
I Minneapolis, MN 55402
333-4800
G of /
/psi 4,-, 4
IIMay 30, 1989 /2P 4,.,5 .,,,Q�,.,.c..")
IThe Honorable Don Chmiel a- u :/a.6/.r G e,,,L ll /2/
and City Council �
City of Chanhassen
I
Box 147
Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317
IIDear Mr. Chmiel and City Council:
Enclosed is a copy of the 1987 Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek
1 Watershed District Engineer' s Annual Report and a copy of the
District' s 1988 Annual Report.
If you have any questions or comments, please contact us.
II
II ---_`__Si n c e r e l
��
''''' PO( / (("6e1
IIRobert ;C. Obermeyer ;
BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY
Engineers for the District
IIRCO/scn
enc.
t
II
II
II
11
I
CITY ® F ��- ��—
CHANHASSEN
1
I
"7
=� 690 COULTER DRIVE • P O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
MEMORANDUM
TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager
1 FROM: Lori Sietsema, Park and Recreation Coordinator oS
DATE: June 20, 1989
SUBJ: Lake Lucy Road Access
This item was originally scheduled for the June 26 , 1989 City
Council meeting. Unfortunately, it was necessary to delete this
I item as all of the information needed is not available.
Specifically, the current owner of the Lake Lucy Highlands outlot
is proposing that the lot be split to accommodate a home and the
access . It is unclear whether this would be possible; there-
fore, a price for the land and even it' s availability is not
certain.
I realize that there is concern that we move ahead on this pro-
ject. However, I do not feel this will set us back significantly
as the LAWCON grant application date has been moved from May to
ISeptember.
I have rescheduled this item to appear on the July 10 , 1989
I agenda and feel confident that all of the information needed will
be available at that time.
c: Park and Recreation Commission
Jo Ann Olsen, Senior Planner
•
I
I
I
I
I
' : 44- L.,4-
cc Pr to /(;�-1"
I LAW Orrlc.rs
GRi NNls, GRANNIS, FARRIi.I. & KNUTSON
DAVID L. GRANNI.,- 1874-1961 PROI'ISSIONAI.ASSOCIATION
TELECOPIER:
I DAVID 1. GRANNIS, JR. - 1910-It)H() POST OEM Box 57
`1 (612)X155-2359
VAN(_E B GRANNIS 403 NURIX'E5T BANK BUILDING B. KNETSCH
VANCE B GRANNIS,JR.* 161 NORTH CONCORD EX(.HANGF: MICHAEL J. MAYER
TIMOTHY J BERG
I ['A'I' A. FARRELL
SOUTH ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55075
DAVID ID L. GRANNIS, 111
IZUGIiR N KNUTSON TELEPHONE(612)455-1661
DAVID L. I IARMEVER
I •AOt,AI/NM-11D Tu
PkAt II'1.IN WIMUNSIN June 12, 1 989
■
I Mr. Jim Chaffee
Chanhassen City Hall
690 Coulter Drive, Box 147
Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317
■ RE: Shooting Permits
IDear Jim:
Your letter of June 7, 1989, asked two questions: (1 ) what
is a platted lot, and ( 2 ) where in the City Code is the
I prohibition against shooting on platted lots or unplatted land of
less than three acres?
A "platted lot" is a lot that is part of a plat that has
been approved by the City Council and filed with the County
Recorder. Section 11 -2 of the City Code provides "no weapon
I permits shall be issued for the area indicated on the map on file
in the City Hall where the discharge of weapons is prohibited. "
The notation on the map that shooting is prohibited on platted
lots or on a tract of unplatted land of less than three acres can
I be considered part of the map which the City Code adopts by
reference.
IVery truly yours,
G' aNN S, GRANN , FARRELL
I •I & K UTSO �.A. .
BY:
Roger N. Knutson
IRNK: srn
cc: Don Ashworth
IScott Harr
I
JUN 1 4 1989
CIT
I CITY OF CHANHASSEN
•
r.
C G 7? c-cK -
' ROSEMOUNT INC.
12001 Technology Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344 U S.A.
(612) 941-5560
' TWX.4310012 or 4310024
FAX. (612) 828-3088
Rosemount
June 13 , 1989
' Mr. Gary G. Warren, P.E.
Chanhassen City Engineer
P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
' Dear Gary:
' As we discussed at our meeting on June 1, 1989, Rosemount's
scheduled occupancy date for the new Chanhassen facility is
still December 15, 1989 . In this regard, the purpose of this
letter is to summarize our review and agreements reached on
June 1st relative to the City's prior commitment to construct
Lake Drive and Market Boulevard, including utilities, by
December 1, 1989 . (Reference Exhibit "F" to contract for
' private development between the HRA in and for the City of
Chanhassen and Rosemount Inc. dated December 13 , 1988 . )
' The agreement was with the understanding that completion of the
roads and utilities did not necessarily include the bitimunious
wear surface or landscaping if weather prohibited that
installation. However,-. paving, curbing, gutter and street
lighting would be complete and all utilities would be in and
serviceable. In April 1989, Rosemount was informed that bad
soil conditions in the east area of Lake Drive would result in
Lake Drive not being fully completed or accessible from the
east until July 1990. As we expressed in our letter of April
28, 1989 to Mr. Don Ashworth, Chanhassen City Manager, we are
' gravely concerned that since there will be no signals at Market
Boulevard and T.H. 5, Rosemount employees and visitors will not
have a signalized left turn access to T.H. 5 via C.O. 17 until
final completion of Lake Drive in July 1990. These concerns
and understanding of the construction problems prompted meetings
with the City on May 17th and June 1st. Although the solutions
arrived at are not the most desirable from Rosemount's
' standpoint, they are workable under the circumstances.
Program review and points covered.
' a Design and construction drawings of the roads and utility
system are complete. Bids for construction are due in on
' June 15, 1989 .
' JUN 141989
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
•
i
Mr. Gary G. Warren, P.E.
June 13, 1989
Page 2
• The Chanhassen City Council is scheduled to act on the '
contract award June 26, 1989.
• With the council's approval, construction can begin as
early as July 5, 1989.
• Market Boulevard will be constructed with a right in and
right out lane pending the installation of traffic signals
by MNDOT. Market Boulevard and utilities will be
constructed past Rosemount's east entrance and will be
fully completed by December 1, 1989. ,
• Bad soil conditions in the Lake Drive area, will require
two separate surcharges as depicted on Exhibit "A" to
BRW's letter dated April 6, 1989. Surcharge area "A" on
the west end of Lake Drive will have a temporary road
over the surcharge from October 1989 until December 1989.
During the initial construction period, a temporary
by-pass for construction traffic and church access will be
maintained. I understand that details and agreement for
construction of this bypass road is currently being
coordinated between Opus Corporation and the City of
Chanhassen. Surcharge "B" will require a longer period of
time for surcharging, resulting in no access from
Rosemount's east parking lot via Market Boulevard to C.O.
17 and the traffic signals at C.O. 17 and T.H. 5. To
provide a temporary solution to this problem, the City
agrees to construct a two-lane blacktop road over
surcharge area "B", • providing an access via Market
Boulevard and Lake Drive to the signals at C.O. 17 and
T.H. 5 for a safe left turn onto T.H. 5. It is also
understood that this temporary two-lane road will have to
be removed in late April or May of 1990 for final
construction. This will require Rosemount to use
alternate access to the signal area during final
construction of Lake Drive.
• Lake Drive from C.O. 17 to Market Boulevard, including the
temporary two-lane road over surcharge "B" will be fully
completed by December 1, 1989 (with the possible
exceptions of a wear surface and landscaping) . '
■
IF
Mr. Gary G. Warren, P.E.
June 13 , 1989
Page 3
e Gas, telephone, and electrical utility companies are being
advised to coordinate their requirements for services with
Mr. Gary Ehret of BRW to resolve any problem associated
with extending service from the east through surcharged
area "B" . It is essential and critical to Rosemount's
business that these services be available to the
Rosemount's facility before December 1989 and that there
' be no interruption of these services while surcharge area
"B" is closed for final construction.
' Gary, I believe these statements are correct as we agreed upon.
If not, please do not hesitate to contact me so that we will
have a mutual understanding of the construction program.
Again, if there is anything that the City can do to assist in
expediting either permanent or temporary traffic signals at
Market Boulevard and T.H. 5, it would resolve the problems and
we would be most appreciative.
Regards,
ROSEMOUNT INC.
/L,1„cp4.7& ,C
' Ernest W. Echols
Construction Manager
ny
cc: Mr. Jeffrey W. Schmitt, Rosemount Inc. (M.S . A7)
Vice President Company Services
Mr. Gary Ehret, BRW Inc.
Thresher Square
700 Third Street
Mpls. , MN 55415
Mr. Don Ashworth
City Manager
City of Chanhassen
1
1
I
i , . , ,
42,
i - /1.4fi
The rzn ste dij etter
1 Published by SPRINGSTED Incorporated, Public Finance Advisors Series MN 1989
June 1
' Interest Rates
Interest rates for both fixed and variable rate dollar remains strong versus foreign currency.
I obligations have continued in their volatile Many private investors are switching to long-
mode over the past 90 days. While dropping term investments in anticipation of lower short-
slightly, short-term rates have remained near term yields.
recent record highs while long-term rates have
I come down over the year's earlier high levels, Unfortunately, national and world markets react
as can be seen by the table below: to every financial indicator with wide swings of
optimism or pessimism. Sometimes we long
Ii 2-30-88 3-1-89 5-26-89 for the "good old days" when interest rates
didn't change by more than 1/4% over twelve
180-Day T-Bills 8.68 9.18 8.98 months; fixed rate obligations were the only
365-Day T-Bills 9.03 9.36 8.94 financing instruments available; the
I Prime Rate 10.50 11.50 11.50 government didn't monitor multiple indicators of
20 Year T-Bonds 9.08 9.24 8.72 economic activity, each report released at
20-Year BBI 7.50 7.55 7.11 different times; and economists were employed
I 30-Year BBI
7-Day TENR 7.71 7.83 7.28
6.50 6.62 only to teach economics to starry-eyed college
7.75 freshmen.
I Pressure for reductions in short-term rates is
mounting as fear of inflation diminishes and the
IArbitrage Regulations
I The Internal Revenue Service, on May 12, be exempt from all arbitrage
released its first set of an expected series of requirements.
arbitrage regulations for a 60 day public
I comment period. The 243 page document 3. Issuers expending all bond proceeds in
provides some help to issuers and related tax- six months will be exempt from rebate
exempt market participants, but a number of requirements on initial bond proceeds but
critical issues will have to await resolution in a will be required to rebate on bond
I second set of regulations due later this year. reserves or non bona fide sinking funds.
Public comments on the initial regulations are
due before July 14. 4. Sinking funds for all issues, except those
IWe reached several general conclusions of "small issuers," will have to be monitored. When balances exceed 13
following a first blush review. months of debt service requirements, the
I fund no longer qualifies as a bona fide
1. There will be no blanket exemption from debt service fund, and investment records
arbitrage rules and rebate requirements and rebate calculations will be required.
for "plain vanilla" general obligation and This monitoring will be critical for certain
I revenue infrastructure related bonds, as types of issues where debt service
some had advocated. revenues can't be fully controlled by an
issuer, such as improvement bonds which
I 2. "Small issuers," less than $5,000,000 of will have special assessment
government bonds in a calendar year, will prepayments.
I 85 East Seventh Place,Suite 100 251 North Illinois Street,Suite 1510 500 Elm Grove Road,Suite 101
Saint Paul,Minnesota 55101 2143 Indianapolis,Indiana 46204.1942 Elm Grove,Wisconsin 53122-0037
612-223.3000 317 237 3636 414.782.8222
' 1
5. A credit of $1,000 per issue per rebate insure an adequate set aside annually of
I
payment will be provided against required rebate payments.
required rebate amounts if the volume of
bonds outstanding per issue is more than If you have questions about the proposed
I
$5,000,000, with declining credits for regulations or arbitrage requirements in
reduced volumes outstanding. general, call your Springsted Project Manager
who may refer your questions to our arbitrage I
6. Rebate payments are due at five-year monitoring staff. As indicated previously,
intervals from the date of original issue of Springsted will complete the required
bonds, and the rebate calculation is not calculations under separate contract, with the
required annually. However, Springsted issuer retaining the responsibility of providing
I
continues to suggest annual calculations us with investment records.
for issuer ease of administration and to
I
Legislative Changes
Many of you still are trying to determine what of tax increment generated by higher tax
the 1989 Legislature did or didn't do to you capacity rates authorized by voter
relative to public policy and finance related approval of increased school budgets.
I
matters. This media doesn't permit an
extensive analysis of these actions or inactions 4. At least 90% of the tax increment revenues
but some of the changes made in bonding derived from a redevelopment district
I
authorizations are listed below: must be used to finance the cost of
correcting those conditions which allowed
1. Issuers may designate an agent for the designation of the redevelopment district
purpose of accepting, opening and status. '
tabulating proposals on bonds which
must be sold through competitive 5. The annual reporting requirements to the
bidding. This authorizes a procedure Commissioner of Revenue by a
I
which has been widely used in the past. municipality on the status of each local tax
increment district were expanded and
2. The requirement for published notices of strengthened. The new rules apply to all I
bond calls was eliminated if mailed notice districts, regardless of when certified. The
was provided the registered holder of the required reports are due by March 1 of
called bonds. each year.
3. Under many conditions, a municipality I
must remit to school districts the amount
I
County Capital Improvement Programs
While the authority of counties to issue bonds preparation and approval stage for such plans I
for approved five-year capital improvement and we would be pleased to assist you.
programs was threatened, legislation to end 111 the program was not approved. Counties The original authority which was granted in
which have not developed approved plans may 1988, and threatened in 1989, serves as an
want to do so and implement financing before example of the difficulty municipalities have in
next year's legislative session. Springsted has carrying out long-term plans in today's fragile
I
worked with a number of counties in the legislative environment.
I
I
•
-
--
7� t
Lc /'C.it /t/a/f-1
i 1 1 i ,. 1 1 1 i _. r • ,.
i _ -1 -1- ,..._. r. 1.
I
_.` i i 1 i I
1
t
A Monthly Newsletter for dousing Leaders June 1989
IHOUSE SIZE AND AMENITIES INCREASE
The median square footage of the 1,083,000 new singles completed in 1988 was up 3.4 percent from 1987 to 1,815
I square feet. A larger percentage of completed 1988 units had central air conditioning, 2 1/2 bathrooms or more; 4
bedrooms or more, and at least one fireplace. Gas continued to be the predominant type of heating fuel. This data parallels
information received from NAHB surveys which show a significant increase in the size and amenities offered in new
homes. And,they help to confirm the on-going trend toward the construction of luxury housing in the single family market.
I The increased share for high-end homes for trade-up buyers is due to, among other things demographic trends (an aging
of the population), and income trends (a greater inequality in the distribution of income). The proportion of new homes
with more than 2 bathrooms has risen every year since 1983, reaching a 42 percent share in 1988. This is nearly double
I the share achieved in 1982. Twenty-six percent of the 1988 units had 4 bedrooms or more, up from 20 and 23 percent in
the two years previous and up from 1982 to 1985. Central air conditioning was included in 75 percent of the 1988 single
family completions. Although the 1988 proportion has not changed significantly from the 1983 findings, it was up some 14
percentage points from 10 years ago. The share of homes with one or more fireplaces rose to 65 percent in 1988.
ISALES AND STARTS
New home sales were stronger than new single family production over the past year. While 1988 new home sales were
I up one percent over 1987, starts of new singles fell 6 percent. This helped push the sales to starts ratio in 1988 to 62.7
percent, up from the 58.6 percent recorded in 1987. One reason for the growth in sales activity relative to starts was that
new construction moved slightly away from the custom built category towards speculative building (for-sale). While the
I share of total singles that were built for-sale rose in 1988 to 65.6 percent (from 63.8 percent in 1987), the custom-built
share fell one percentage point to 32.3 percent. Furthermore, the total number of spec units begun last year was down 3
percent while those units constructed for custom purposes fell by some 10 percent.
IIMPACT FEES FOR RATS , _
It is no novelty for developers, hard hit by fat fees for such vital community needs as parks and sewers, to pass these
costs on to home buyers. But builders in Riverside County, east of Los Angeles, have pushed this stratagem to the limit,
Ireports U.S. News & World Reports. "They are charging buyers $1,950 per acre to defray the expense of building a
30-square-mile system of preserves in which rats can cavort and breed, safe from steam shovels and bulldozers. The
creature to be saved is not the big-city rat but the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat. That 12-inch-long cousin of squirrels and
Ibeavers is a benign rodent with friends in Washington. Last fall, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service placed the animal on its
endangered-species list, making it illegal to harm one. Riverside County's grasslands serve as the rodent's native habitat.
County officials not only imposed a special fee on developers to pay for a $103 million preserve but felt they had to
temporarily halt home building."
EVALUATION OF RADON MITIGATION EFFORTS MADE EASIER
A program to evaluate the effectiveness of radon prevention methods used by builders in new home construction has
I been announced by NAHB's National Research Center. Known as the New Home Evaluation Program and funded by the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), it features:
• A detailed field evaluation of a builder's radon resistant construction methods, beginning in the preconstruction phase.
I • An evaluation of on-site soil conditions using state-of-the-art measurement of soil radon levels and an evaluation of the
resistance of soil to air flow.
• A detailed review and analysis of radon prevention systems.
• A review and analysis of the costs of radon prevention used by builders. Recommendations will be made to reduce radon
I prevention costs where appropriate.
• A 60-day radon test inside the home after construction.This can provide the builder with more representative results than
short-term screening tests.
I • Correlation of radon characteristics with construction procedures to determine causes of the indoor readings.
There is no charge to participate in this program. For more information, telephone the building system division, NAHB's
National Research Center, at(800) 638-8556.
I
,I�Ioisington Group Inc. s/ r
1 CL
Land Use Consultants
1 PHASE I - MEDICAL ARTS BUILDING APPROVALS/
1 DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE
CITY OF CHANHASSEN 6-8-89
1
JAN 6 - MAR 8 CHADDA TO RESOLVE FINANCING,PROVIDE
1 EASEMENT, PREPARE BUILDING PLANS/SPECS
1 JAN 6 - 13 PREPARATION OF REDEV AGREEMENT
JAN 10 - FEB 1 PREPARATION OF PROPERTY SURVEY AND SITE
' PLAN (CITY)
JAN 19 HRA REVIEW/APPROVAL OF REDEV AGREEMENT
' JAN 23
CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZES UPDATING OF
' FEASIBILITY STUDY
FEB 13 CITY COUNCIL SETS 429 PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR
1 MAR 13
FEB 16 HRA REVIEW/APPROVAL OF REDEV AGREEMENT/
' PURCHASE AGREEMENT
FEB 20 - 23 PREPARE 429 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
1 FEB 23
PUBLICATION OF 429 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
1 FEB 27 CITY COUNCIL ACCEPTANCE OF FEASIBILITY STUDY
1 MAR 1 - 29 PREPARE/SUBMIT PRELIMINARY PLAT (CITY)
MAR 1 - MAY 1 PREPARE EROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR
' WATERSHED DISTRICT(CITY)
MAR 2 MAIL 429 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICES
' 7300 Metro Blvd
Suite 525
Edina,MN 55435
1 (612)835-9960
I
1
MAR 8 PUBLIC INFORMATION/LANDOWNERS MEETING '
RE: FEASIBILITY STUDY
MAR 13 CITY-COUNCIL 429 PUBLIC HEARING/AUTHORIZE I
PARKING PLANS/SPECS
MAR 14 - JUN 12 PREPARE COLONIAL CENTER FACADE '
AND PARKING LOT PLANS/SPECS (CITY)
MAR 31 PREPARE PRELIMINARY PLAT HEARING NOTICES
S
APR 6 PUBLISH/MAIL PUBLIC HEARING NOTICES ON 1
PRELIMINARY PLAT
APR 19 PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING ON
PRELIMINARY PLAT AND SITE PLAN REVIEW
APR 30 COMPLETION OF MEDICAL ARTS BUILDING
PLANS/SPECS
MAY 1 APPLY FOR WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT
MAY 1 - 31 CITY BUILDING DEPT REVIEW OF BUILDING PLANS/
SPECS; BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE
MAY 22 CITY COUNCIL ACCEPTANCE OF PARKING PLANS/ ,
SPECS; AUTHORIZE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS;
APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT AND SITE PLAN I
MAY 31 ISSUANCE OF FOOTINGS/FOUNDATION PERMIT;
BREAK GROUND FOR FOOTINGS/FOUNDATION
MAY 31 COMPLETION OF CENEX REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN
AND GIVE NOTICE TO VACATE (60 DAY NOTICE
REQUIRED)OR ACQUIRE EASEMENTS
JUN 7 WATERSHED DISTRICT MEETING
G
2
•
tl
' JUN 7 PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW OF
COLONIAL CENTER FACIA
JUN 7 BEGIN ADVERTISING FOR PARKING LOT BIDS
' * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
JUN 8 - 13 REVIEW/COMMENT ON DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
' JUN 22 HRA AUTHORIZATION TO TAKE BIDS (FACIA)/
APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
' JUN 23
COMMENCE FACIA BIDDING/ADVERTISING
JUN 26 - 28 CLOSING ON PROPERTY
' JUN 29 BID OPENING (PARKING)
JUL 7 BID OPENING (FACIA)
' JUL 10 CITY COUNCIL AWARD OF CONTRACT C (PARKING)
' JUL 13 HRA AWARD OF CONTRACT(FACIA)
JUL 13 - SEP 8 COLONIAL CENTER FACIA CONSTRUCTION
JUL 21 COMMENCE PARKING LOT CONSTRUCTION
' AUG 1 CITY TAKE POSSESSION OF CENEX
' SEP 15 COMPLETE PARKING LOT BASE COURSE
OCT 15 COMPLETE PARKING LOT
NOV 1 BUILDING OCCUPANCY; PARKING LOT
' LANDSCAPING AND FINAL PROJECT COMPLETION
NOV 1989 GRAND OPENING
3
■
VOTO, TAUTGES, REDPATH & CO., LTD. Vilirc
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Birch Lake Professional Building •1310 E. Hwy. 96 • White Bear Lake, MN 55110 • Phone 426-3263 --
I
May 10, 1989 ROBERT I.VOTO,CPA
I ROBERT G.TAUTGES,CPA
IAMB S.REDPATH,CPA
D KENNETH GEORGE,CPA
DAVID I.MOL,CPA
I Donald Ashworth, City Manager
City of Chanhassen
690 Coulter Drive
IChanhassen, Minnesota 55317
Dear Don:
I Congratulations on the successful completion of the 1988 year-end closing and 1988 Annual
Financial Report. For your reference, I have summarized our audit hours and fees for 1986
through 1988:
I1986 1987 1988
Description Hours Dollars Hours Dollars Hours Dollars
I Partner/Manager 189 $2,563 142 $7,970 132 S7,640
Senior/Semi-Senior Staff 203 15,544 293 10,264 429 17,565
Other Staff 253 7,294 385 11,158 180 5,407
Subtotal 645 25,401 820 29,392 741 30,612
I Typists, etc. 90 1,620 100 1,804 74 1,406
Reports 549 532 570
Total incurred 735 27,570 920 31,728 815 32,588
IAmount Billed 21,263 24,319 29,535
Amount Unbilled $6,307 $7,409 S3,053
As shown above, in 1986 and 1987 we incurred substantial fees for which we did not bill the City.
I We anticipated this to be temporary as the City's finance department increased efforts. Although
the City's financial accounting system is producing quality financial data,increased audit effort has
resulted from increased national reporting/disclosure requirements and increased volume of
I financial activity (bonding and construction) of the City. The 1988 audit bill reflects this increased
audit effort. Allocations/coding are included in the enclosed billings.
If you have questions or need additional information, please advise.
IThank you for the opportunity to be of service.
ISincerely,
VOTO, TAUTGES, REDPATH & CO., LTD.
I
obert G. Tautges, CPA
I
• MEMBERS OF AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS• PRIVATE COMPANIES PRACTICE SECTION
MINNESOTA SOCIETY OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION•MINNESOTA ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL BUSINESS OFFICIALS
111
de. AOtoly 4c.4C r (161
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
111 Third Avenue South, Suite 350 Phone:(612)332-0421
' Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 Fax: (612) 332-6180
USA
—
MEMORANDUM TO: TH 5 Design File
' COPIES TO: Technical Advisory Coimnittee
Southwest Coalition Board
FROM: Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
DATE: June 8, 1989
SUBJECT: Right-of-Way/Design Status for S.P. 2701-34 and
1002-51, 55
S.P. 2701-34 (HENNEPIN COUNTY SEGMENT)
Item/Status
' 1. Right-of-Way
MOOT central office in process of completing final R/W "ball-point"
plat map.
' Field titles for 16 of 24 affected parcels complete and in hands of
appraiser.
' 2. Construction Plans
' A. Roadway Design
Final roadway plans underway for September campletion. Final
soils letter completed. Current plans submitted to District 5
' Surveys for comment.
Modification of typical section during the final design phase
' between station 1108 and Heritage Road offset left, warrants
review and acceptance by affected property miner. Meeting with
property owner pending.
B. Drainage Design
Design comments received from hydraulics unit. Minor items
' required for completion, 100 percent ccatipletion targeted for
August.
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
C. Traffic Signals
Both intersection designs complete and are still being reviewed by
District 5. Signal justification report also pending District 5
review. '
D. Pavement Jointing/Drain Tile Plans
Design 50 percent complete. '
E. Landscaping Plans
Planting plans 90 percent complete. City forester to review and ,
comment.
Roadside restoration pending MnBar ag-engineer input. '
S.P. 1002-51 (fARVER aXJNI'X SEGMENT)
Item/Status
1. Right-of-Way '
Base mapping for R/W work map 90 percent complete. Determination of
final construction limits 90 percent complete pending design
considerations on cross-sections. Proposed R/W and easements to be
determined after final construction limits are set.
2. Construction Plans '
A. Roadway Design
Supplemental survey data for cross-section extensions received.
Proposed cross-sections drafted and submitted to MnDCT District 5
Soils for detailed soils investigation. Mainline profile drafting
complete. Mainline construction plans drafting 30 percent
complete.
B. Intersection Designs '
a. All data required to cumence final intersection designs
received except Dakota Avenue survey data and Market
Boulevard construction plans north of TH 5.
b. Signal justification reports being prepared; need projected
turning movements for Market Boulevard, TH 101 and Dakota '
Avenue to complete reports.
2
' Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
I
C. Bridge Design
' Preliminary bridge plan submitted and approved by MnDOrr central
office. Final bridge plans to commence.
' D. landscape Plan
' Pending receipt of Chanhassen Tree Replacement Policy.
1
1
1
1
3
I
1
1 CTYOF
ANHASSEN
t1
1 t
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
' June 12, 1989
Mr. B. C. Burdick
' 426 Lake Street
Excelsior, MN 55331
Re: County Road 17 Right-in/Right-out
File No. 87-2
' Dear Mr. Burdick:
I have had a chance to review your June 6 , 1989 letter which I re-
ceived from you at our meeting on June 9 , 1989 . I am enclosing as
' requested a copy of the Year 2005 Land Use Transportation Plan which
was prepared by a consortium of consultants , namely Brauer & Associates,
Ltd. , Hoisington Group, Inc . and Benshoof & Associates, Inc.
' As noted in my earlier letter , the Year 2005 traffic volumes for
the street configuration are not totally available from this
report since the actual intersection configuration for the Trunk
' Highway 5 expansion project at County Road 17 was not known at
that time. The Year 2005 traffic information update, which was
requested as a part of your submittal , was necessary to reflect
' this more specific information on the intersection. This is
especially important since, as I am sure your consultants are
aware, the Highway 5 expansion in this area will be on the north
' side of the present Highway 5 , some 36 feet into the easement,
thereby shortening the transition area available between Trunk
Highway 5 and the proposed right-in/right-out connection. As I
noted to you, Mr. Warzala has recently provided me with this
' updated traffic information.
Concerning your response to the specific items in my June 2, 1989
' letter, I offer the following:
1 . & 2 . I likewise am not interested in a preponderance of
signage; however , I am confident that the additional
signage which I had indicated can be properly located
and effective. As noted in Benshoof ' s July 28 , 1987
review of this issue , the key is to discourage traffic
from shortcutting through this connection to the down-
town . The signage I proposed was primarily oriented to
accomplishing this end as well as to keep tractor-
trailer traffic from clogging this sensitive merging
area. I likewise believe that this can be worked out in
the design plan .
1
Mr. B.C. Burdick 111
June 12 , 1989
Page 2
3 . My suggestion for aligning your driveway opposite the
James ' westerly access would be done in conjunction with
granting a driveway easement to Lot 1 . I believe the
traffic patterns would be improved by centering these
turning movements at one location and thereby the basis
for my recommendation. This again was merely a
suggestion in the interest of traffic safety.
4 . & 5 . No response. ,
6 . I stand by my June 2, 1989 discussion on the issue con-
cerning a lack of knowledge of the land use proposed for —
Burdick Park Second Addition . As we are not aware of
who the "reputable national corporation" is nor are we
aware of any internal site development plans, it is very
difficult for any of the parties to specifically analyze
the total impact to this area. I merely have pointed
out that if there is an opportunity to utilize the site
development process for routing of traffic through the
proposed Burdick Park Second Addition sites, that this
would become far more attractive from a traffic safety
standpoint in aadressing the major concern of short-
cutting West 78th Street traffic .
7 . As I mentioned to you at our meeting on June 9 , the City
Council has taken action in a similar traffic issue
relating to the Al Klingelhutz property north of the Soo
Line Railroad tracks at Great Plains Boulevard in which
a curb cut was approved for access to his business with 111
the understanding that if traffic safety concerns dic-
tate in the future, that this curb cut could be re-
evaluated at the City ' s discretion. By necessity all
information to date has been based on computer projec-
tions and land use assumptions , since specific develop-
ment
information is not available. Therefore, a
temporary status might be appropriate as a result. As I
am sure your are aware, no matter what the approved sta-
tus is of a connection at this location, if safety
issues become significant even a permanent connection
could come under scrutiny at such time .
8. As I relayed to you in our meeting, the Carver County
Engineer has advised me that if this is a private drive,
then it indeed should be a private application . Since
Mr. James would also be a party to this roadway, he
would also appropriately be a co-applicant with you to
the County for this connection.
I
1
4
Mr. B.C. Burdick
June 12 , 198
► 9
Page 3
In closing, I would just like to reiterate what I told you in our
meeting of June 9 , that being, my sole intent in providing this
review was to provide the Carver County Engineer the benefit of
my thoughts on this plan to try to obtain as safe a connection as
' reasonably possible for this right-in/right-out if allowed. I
believe we all share the common interest in not losing the bene-
fit of our West 78th Street detachment project and in providing
as safe a roadway connection to your property as is reasonable.
In this regard, it may appear to you that my comments were
contrary to the wishes of the City Council; however, believe me,
they are offered in the spirit of doing what is best for the City
' and the public in this regard and are very much oriented to
seeing that this connection can be accomplished in as safe a
manner as possible, recognizing the multitude of goals that have
' been set out.
I apologize for the length of this letter and I do not intend to
proliferate the paper trail but I thought it appropriate to
' clarify some inaccuracies in interpretation which were apparent
from your June 6 corresponaence. As always , I am available to
discuss these matters with you or your consultants at your
' pleasure.
Sincerely,
' CITY OF CHANHASSEN
P /' 4( i
' Gary G. Warren, P.E.
City Engineer
' GGW:ktm
Enclosure: Year 2005 Land Use and Transportation Study
c: Charlie James
Roger Gustafson, County Engineer
' Don Ashworth, City Manager
Dave Warzala , Barton-Aschman Associates , Inc.
Roger Knutson , City Attorney
bc: Gary Ehret, BRW
Mayor and City Council
■
�..R CO, ,
II l,
�,; �� CARVER COUNTY COURTHOUSE
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT \ / 600 EAST 4TH STREET
I (612) 448-3435 CHASKA,MINNESOTA 55318
ANNE SOS
II June 1, 1989 COUNTY OF EA VEQ
1 Capt. Bob Pagelkopf
Carver County Sheriff's Department
IIChaska, Minnesota 55318
Re: Co. Rd. 14 (Pioneer Trail) Temporary Closure
IDear Capt. Pagelkopf:
Carver County will be reconstructing Co. Rd. 14 (Pioneer Trail)
I between Hwy. 101 and the Carver/Hennepin county line in Chanhassen
this summer. The project will require closing the road to traffic
for a period of about two months.
IIDuring this time a marked detour route will be in effect between
Chaska and Eden Prairie along Co. Rd. 17, Hwy. 212 , and Hwy. 169 .
II However, we would expect that motorists familiar with the area will
use Bluff Creek Drive, Hwy. 101, and other routes as short cuts.
We did not consider Hwy. 101 for the detour due to a bridae located
just north of Hwy. 212 which has a weight restriction of 5 tons per
Ivehicle.
We have sent news releases to all of the area newspapers to alert
the traveling public about the road closure and detour route for
ICo. Rd. 14 .
We ask that your department notify all emergency service units
II (police, fire, medical) in the areas that could be affected by the
road closure. The contractor working on the project must provide
access to the homes of residents who live along the Co. Rd. 14
II construction project, but there may be brief periods when the road
is impassable due to certain construction activities or the result
of weather conditions. We will try to keep your office posted on
these situations.
1 We expect to close Co. Rd. 14 sometime in mid-June. We will
contact your office in advance.
IISir ncerely,
R
II /)7, --.) -V),L2)
,46n n D. Weller
Civil Engineer
IJDW/cjr
IIAffirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer
■
CO. RO, t4 (PfeeR. 'TRAt L) c LcsuRG
to
41 CHANHASSEN or) 0
> w? EDEN PRAIRIE
/ -
W�a
17
�
101 z
v1w I • 19
2612
p/O4,FFR
• I 0 7'4'4/4
Pip E.ER TRAIL ,.. /
OBRIDGE 0 AIRPORT 0
VER RAILROAD
14 �
I01 16s
212
/ +
• 0 1 2
• l I
101 16 1 1
, ROAD TO MILES
BE CLOSED
CHASKA , N• , At■
41 WM DETOUR ROUTE
MI MI OM — or um NE No — EN Ns ow BO EN Ns ow IN Er =I
CITY OF
CHANI1ASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
r (612) 937-1900
MEMORANDUM
rTO: City Maintenance Employees
FROM: Deb Rand, Community Service Officer\JJ
DATE: April 25, 9 9 1 8 `-Q`"
• p
' SUBJ: Reporting Suspicious Activity
In recent weeks employees of Victory Envelope, Inc. have been the
victims of ongoing theft and vandalism to their automobiles .
These incidents have occurred during day and nighttime hours and
in both parking lots.
Because you are out and about and know the City well, we are
asking for your help. Please keep your eyes and ears open for
anything that may seem suspicious or "out of the ordinary" . Some
particular things to watch for are:
' 1. Persons loitering, going car to car, or tampering with
vehicles;
' 2. A person running, especially if carrying something of
value;
' 3 . Breaking of glass or vehicle alarm is heard;
4 . Slow moving vehicles without lights or if course followed
' appears aimless .
If you should see or hear suspicious activity use your city radio
to call City Hall and report this activity. City Hall will then
forward this information to the Sheriff ' s Department so they can
take the proper action. It is also a good idea to " jot down"
information such as: license plate # , vehicle description,
description of suspicious parties , etc.
Remember, this is for reporting purposes only. Do not take mat-
, ters into your own hands or get physically or directly involved.
If you are close enough to see, you are close enough!
And remember - suspicious activity observed anywhere in the City
' should be reported to the Sheriff ' s Department. Your cooperation
and assistance in this matter is greatly appreciated.
Thanks for helping keep the crime rate down in our City!
•
CITY OF
C .: 11,111ASSEN
Fy
l
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
I
MEMORANDUM
' TO: Scott Harr, Assistant Public Safety Director
FROM: Steve A. Kirchman, Building Inspectpr 4,C41C ,
' Carl Barke, Mechanical Inspector
DATE: May 22 , 1989
SUBJ: North Star Meeting
Carl and I attended the meeting of the North Star Chapter of the
g p
' ICBO on Friday, May 19 . The meeting, was held at the Fort
Snelling Officer ' s Club.
The business meeting was followed by three short seminars . The
' first seminar was presented by United States Gypsum. Subjects
covered were steel stud framing, curtain wall framing, and
exterior cement board applications . The second seminar was pre-
sented by Sandra Becker from the Department of Rhetoric at the
' University of Minnesota. The seminar "Effective Writing in Busi-
ness" explored different methods of starting letters, editing
letters , and analyzing the audience. Th.e third seminar intro-
duced low level self illuminated exit signs , a new development
under consideration by the ICBO.
We received one continuing education unit towards recertification.
1 '
% fl
I
I
I
a yri ra 4-
1 s �=
CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
1 (612) 937-1900
1
MEMORANDUM Ent '®'
N.,,
2.
kr
1 DATE: June 9. 1989
TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager __-` ."_'.�,..;J
FROM: Jean Meuwissen . Treasurer eA P saCa-114-Pr
Cc fZzc.• /4.
SUBJECT: Water Customer Remote Meter Readers
We currently have over 50 water customers who have not installed
1 remote meter readers. This creates constant problems with our uti-
lity billing operations. We are sending the attached letter to all
of these people in an effort to correct the situation .
1 Jerry Boucher has agreed to make time available for installation of
these remote readers.
1
cc : Gary Warren
Jerry Boucher
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
, - .
CITY
OF
. _. k
C BANHASSEN 1
1
'� 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
�' (612) 937-1900 II
I
June 9. 1989
II
Mr. Ronald Pilgrim II
8026 Dakota
Chanhassen , MN 55317 II
Dear Mr. Pilgrim:
Chanhassen City Code Section 19-24 requires ALL structures serviced
II
by the City water system to have a remote meter reader.
Our records indicate that you have not yet had a remote meter reader I
installed . We are currently launching an all-out effort to bring
everyone in the City into compliance with City Code.
Please contact either Betty Eidam or myself at 937-1900 to make
II
arrangements for installation of your remote reader. The installa-
tion will be done by City personnel At no charge except for the
device. The total cost to you will be $30.00 which will be billed on
II
your next four quarterly billings at $7. 50 each quarter with no
interest charged .
Thank you for your cooperation.
II
Sincerely,
II
Jean Meuwissen
II
Treasurer
1
1
1
I
■
. CITY OF
, ,,,245-...ii/
0 ,: ANHAssEN
. ,,_ ,. _. 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
— (612) 937-1900
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Staff
7 FROM: Scott Harr, Assistant Public Safety Director
DATE: June 20, 1989
SUBJ: Environmental Survey
Attached please find a June 13 letter from Braun Engineering
requesting any information regarding knowledge of environmental
hazards that may have been present at the indicated location.
Would you please advise me as soon as possible if you have any
such knowledge? Thank you.
cc: Braun Environmental Laboratory
6800 South Highway 169
P.O. Box 35108
Minneapolis , MN 55435
Attn: Mr. David Tetley, Environmental Geologist
0.,... (.A,r rte,f.-..s+.t.. ty/ c..T'y ��"`.....
4, Qii.,. . 4 4----, i
* ,4 .J 3 ,
F 14 hi! f TM
:_ l It -
ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES Quality Services Since 1957
In.o.po.IM
MINNESOTA ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING
Minneapolis AND CONSULTING SERVIC:
Hibbing
St.Cloud Reply to address/phone#:
Rochester
St.Paul
AFFILIATED OFFICES 6800 South TH-169
NORTH DAKOTA P.O. Box 35108
Bismarck Mpls. , MN 55435
Williston
Minot (612) 941-5600
MONTANA FAX # 941-4151
Billings
Bozeman
ILLINOIS June 13 , 1989
Chicago
WISCONSIN
Milwaukee
Somerset Chanhassen City Hall
Roger V Blomqwst,Ph.D. Attn: Mr. Scott Harr
Paul R.Book.CPG
J.S.Braun,P.E. 690 Coulter Drive
C.G.Kruse,P.E. Chanhassen, MN 55317
Anne L.Ochs
Gregory G.Olson
AFFILIATED COMPANIES RE: EG-245 Northeast Quadrant of West 79th
Braun Engineering Street and Proposed Market
Testing Boulevard
Braun Pavement
Technologies,Inc. Chanhassen, MN 55317
Dear Mr. Harr:
As per your request during our phone conversation on June
12 , 1989, I am submitting a letter documenting my
question regarding the environmental status of the
reference site. I wish to determine from City of
Chanhassen officials any documented or personnel
knowledge of potential hazards in the vicinity of the
site. Such environmental hazards would include leaking
underground storage tanks, areas where hazardous waste
may or may have been disposed of, and locations of farm
dumps or old landfills.
I appreciate any assistance that the City of Chanhassen
can provide and would appreciate a timely response to
this letter due to time constraints involved with this
project.
Sincerely yours,
BRAUN ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES , INC.
David A. Tetley
Environmental Geologist
DAT:smkl/EG-245.JUN
.A.OHA WATERSHED BOUNDARY —+
•
CG (I/
,Fy
M I NN&
(4;4sHED D�`'� �y�
•coy cyff
11/11NRIEMAHA CREEK
LAKE MINNETONKA
WATERSHED DISTRICT
P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 MINNESOTA RIYER
BOARD OF MANAGERS: Camille D.Andre,Pres. • Albert L.Lehman • John E.Thomas
James R.Spensley • Richard R.Miller • Robert D.Erickson • C.Woodrow Love
May 31, 1989
TO: Interested Citizens
RE: 1988 Annual Report
Dear Sir or Madam:
Enclosed is a copy of the Annual Report of the
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for 1988. Should you have
any questions regarding the District 's activities, please feel
free to contact any member of the Board of Managers.
Very truly yours,
BC,:i)2f/"*".1 J mis R. Spensle , President
rd of Managers
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
ZRSV815 (3)
UN 2 1989
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
s
MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
ANNUAL REPORT FOR 1988
May, 1989
INTRODUCTION
This Annual Report of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed
District provides a summary of the major activities of the Board
of Managers during 1988 . Any person wishing additional
information is encouraged to contact any individual manager .
THE MANAGERS AND MEETING INFORMATION
As of December 1988, the Managers of the Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District were as follows :
Camille D. Andre 10401 Cedar Lake Road Term Expires
Apartment 419 March 8, 1989
Minnetonka, MN 55343
Robert Erickson 2800 McKenzie Pt . Road Term Expires
Wayzata, MN 55391 March 8, 1990
Albert L. Lehman 3604 West Sunrise Drive Term Expires
Minnetonka, MN 55345 March 8 , 1991
C. Woodrow Love P. 0. Box 524 Term Expires
Excelsior, MN 55331 March 8 , 1989
Richard R. Miller 5340 Hollywood Road Term Expires
Edina, MN 55436 March 8 , 1991
James R. Spensley 5117 Chicago Avenue Term Expires
Minneapolis, MN 55417 March 8, 1990
John E. Thomas 6326 Smithtown Road Term Expires
Excelsior, MN 55331 March 8, 1989
The present officers are:
James R. Spensley President
C. Woodrow Love Vice President
John E. Thomas Secretary
Albert L. Lehman Treasurer
During 1988, twelve regular meetings were held by the
Managers on the third Thursday of every month at 7 : 30 p.m. In
order to make the meetings of the Managers more accessible to all
residents of the District , the Managers meet in odd-numbered
months at the St . Louis Park City Hall , and in even-numbered
months at the Wayzata City Hall .
The Managers exchanged information with other governmental
units affected by the programs and policies of the District, and
honored requests to attend meetings of municipal, county, and
state officials as well as meetings of interested citizens . The
Managers received support and assistance from the Hennepin and
Carver County Boards of Commissioners through the year which
greatly assisted the District in carrying out its programs during
1988 .
The Managers continued to work during 1988 with other
organizations concerned with water resource issues . Manager
Miller served on the Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force and the
Board of Managers heard a report from the executive director of
the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District concerning this problem
weed. Manager Lehman and the District Engineer served on the
Technical Committee of the Hennepin Conservation District to
develop uniform erosion control guidelines . The Board
participated in the activities of the Metropolitan Area section
of the Minnesota Association of Watershed Districts, and in the
deliberations of the annual state-wide meeting of the
Association, held December 2 and 3 , 1988 .
The Managers supplied copies of minutes of all meetings and
reports to interested citizens and to public officials throughout
the District . Copies of the 1987 report were filed with the
Minnesota Water Resources Board, the Department of Natural
Resources , the Boards of County Commissioners of Hennepin and
Carver Counties, and with State Senators and Representatives from
the area within the District .
PERMIT APPLICATIONS
The District received 167 permit applications during 1988 .
Each application was reviewed in detail for compliance with the
District ' s rules . Applications were received for projects such
as dredging, shoreline erosion protection, stream and lake
crossings, wetland and floodplain alteration, and stormwater
management plans for site development . Prior to action on the
applications , the District staff spent considerable effort with
city staff and/or applicants to bring some of the proposed
projects into compliance with District rules . A summary of the
permits reviewed by the Board in 1988 is attached to this report,
showing the project location and type of application received.
As in previous years, a large majority of the applications
received were from the Lake Minnetonka portion of the watershed
district, reflecting the continuing urbanization of this area of
the District .
All permits issued by the District require compliance with
applicable municipal ordinances and, if the permit involves
docking on Lake Minnetonka, the applicable ordinances of the Lake
Minnetonka Conservation District . In addition, permits issued by
-2-
the watershed district require compliance with any applicable
rules of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources . The
Board of Managers also took action as necessary concerning
complaints , permit violations , and activities which had been
undertaken without a required permit from the District .
HYDROLOGIC DATA COLLECTION
The District continued its Hydrologic Data Collection
Program during 1988 . The data for 1987 were published in the
Annual Hydrologic Data Report in July 1988 . This is a
comprehensive program, which, along with data from other
agencies , has formed a long-term data bank for use in managing
the water resources of the District, particularly Lake Minnetonka
and the Minneapolis city lakes . Copies of this report were
submitted to the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources, the
Metropolitan Council , the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the
Department of Natural Resources, the Fresh Water Biological
Institute, and local government officials, citizens ' groups, and
interested citizens . No major changes in water quality occurred
during 1987 in Lake Minnetonka, and stream quality in the
District also remained essentially unchanged from the prior year.
HEADWATERS DAM AND CONTROL STRUCTURE (GRAY'S BAY) AND LAKE
MINNETONKA ELEVATIONS/MINNEHAHA CREEK FLOWS
During 1988 , the District operated the Headwaters Control
Structure at Gray' s Bay under the management policy and
operational plan as reapproved by the Department of Natural
Resources in March 1986 . At the end of 1988 , the District
submitted an application to the Department of Natural Resources
to renew the permit for the control structure. The District also
solicited comments on the application from cities , counties , and
other interested agencies or parties . The Lake Minnetonka
Conservation District submitted a comment in December 1988,
asking the District to develop a fragment barrier device for the
outlet of the control structure in order to prevent the
dissemination of the Eurasian Water Milfoil . The Board of
Managers directed the District Engineer to study and develop a
proposal for such a device for the outlet .
Due to exceptionally low precipitation during 1988 , and
abnormally dry conditions throughout the summer, the level of
Lake Minnetonka remained low and the control structure remained
closed throughout the year. Lake Minnetonka reached a low
elevation of 926 . 00 on November 3 , and a high elevation of 928 . 20
on April 18 . Due to the low lake level (below the established
discharge elevation of 928 . 6) , no discharge from the Headwaters
Control Structure occurred.
The Managers continued to rely heavily upon participation
of each of the municipalities on Minnehaha Creek in recording
creek elevations and flows and reporting that data to the
-3-
REAUTHORIZATION OF DISTRICT POLICY CONCERNING DREDGING PERMITS
The Board of Managers noted the extensive requests for
dredging permits and the low level of Lake Minnetonka during the
summer of 1988 . On July 21, 1988 , the Board re-authorized a
resolution previously adopted on June 18 , 1987, to permit
dredging in limited circumstances without prior Board approval .
Following a review of the issues and procedures concerning
dredging permits , the Board authorized the District Engineer from
July 21, 1988 , to October 1, 1988, to issue dredging permits for
commercial and residential properties without prior Board
approval if the application meets all applicable criteria of the
District ' s rules, and in addition, meets all of the following
standards :
1 . Any required DNR permit or approval has been issued;
2 . The purpose of the dredging is to maintain a depth of
water necessary for navigational access;
3 . The volume of dredged material to be removed does not
exceed 10% of the volume removed under the most recent
DNR or Minnehaha Creek Watershed District dredging
permit issued for the site and the area to be dredged
does not exceed 10% of the area most recently dredged
under such a permit . The Engineer may allow dredging
exceeding these percentages where necessary for
reasonable navigational access if such dredging
represents the minimal impact solution; and
4 . Approvals granted under this resolution shall be
reported to the Board of Managers at the next regular
meeting following the Engineer ' s approval .
Approvals under this resolution are to be issued only once for a
specific site.
OTHER DISTRICT PROJECTS AND CONCERNS
At the request of the City of Shorewood and the Village of
Tonka Bay, the District studied the feasibility of various
alternative remedies to a persistent drainage problem at the
intersection of Glenn Road and County Road 19 . The District
Engineer issued a hydrologic analysis in June 1988 which
recommended a number of drainage improvements in this
subwatershed area . Managers Love, Erickson, and Spensley
attended a joint meeting on August 16 of the Tonka Bay and
Shorewood city councils to discuss the project . Following this
meeting , the District Engineer prepared, at the request of Tonka
Bay, a work plan to expand the hydrologic analysis to include the
subwatershed which is tributary to the Manitou Park area in Tonka
Bay. The drainage improvements in this area were still under
consideration at the end of 1988 .
-5-
4. HOm
�oc u�'C'
�` STATE OF MINNESOTA
�-�w' _' OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
ii1858i.
ST. PAUL 55155
RUDY PERPICH
GOVERNOR
June 22, 1989
City of Chanhassen
690 Coulter Drive
P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317
Dear Friends :
Regretfully, I am unable to be with you today as you celebrate
the new quarters of the Chanhassen Public Safety Department.
This is a momentous occassion to celebrate the progress and
growth in the community of Chanhassen.
I send my heatfelt congratulations and accolades to all the
individuals who made the new quarters a reality. The City of
Chanhassen remains committed to growth through excellence. My
very best wishes for an open house celebration filled with
excitement and pride.
Sincerely,
.Gc_41.. G'CG/
. 00:�4
RUDY PERPIICH
Governor
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
5• »
c 'cis`fq;4;,
r OUNw
STATE OF MINNESO'T'A
•«�- ..* .•` OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
iAl-ir
ST. PAUL 55155
RUDY PERPICH
GOVERNOR
June 22, 1989
Dear Open House Attendees:
I am delighted to send greetings to all of you attending
tonight ' s open house celebrating the Chanhassen Department of
Public Safety moving into new quarters . I 'm sure everyone
attending will enjoy this event as they tour the new facilities
and meet their local public safety officials .
The City of Chanhassen continues to expand and this new
facility will serve the needs of your growing community. This
is a particularly important event in that Chanhassen Public
Safety is a coordinating body, working with a variety of
excellent agencies, including the Minnesota State Patrol,
Carver County Sheriff ' s Department, Waconia Ambulance,
St . Francis Ambulance, North Air Care, the Chanhassen Fire
Department, as well other public safety organizations . You are
to be commended on the planning and cooperative efforts it took
to achieve such a comprehensive public safety facility.
Best wishes to the citizens of Chanhassen for continued growth,
and excellent planning for your city' s needs .
Sincerely,
„Cri..::::.t.."47 :::::•a:C:),:r--4
RUDY PERPIICH
Governor
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
s,�„
7(1u CC-
,-dm'n Sec+
CITY OF CHANHASSEN 6/27/89
FUTURE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS
ENGINEERING
July 10, 1989
- Approve Development Contract for Audubon Court, Improvement Project No. 89-7
- Review Greenwood Shores Parking Issue
- Public Hearing, Official Mapping of Trunk Highway 101 from Rosemount
Entrance to Proposed Trunk Highway 212
- Adoption of Official Map, Trunk Highway 101 from Rosemount Entrance to
Proposed Trunk Highway 212
- Approve Preliminary Plans for Trunk Highway 212 Official Mapping; Layout
S.P. 1017-7
- Confirm Sidewalk Location for Lake Susan Hills West 1st Addition, Phases I
and II; Consider City-Wide Sidewalk Policy
- Award of Bids, North Side Parking Lot Improvement Project No. 87-17
- Authorize Advertising for Bids for Sidewalks in Saddlebrook Subdivision,
Project No. 87-15A
July 24, 1989
- Accept Feasibility Study for Utility and Roadway Improvements to Frontier
Trail from Highland Drive to Kiowa, Call Public Hearing
- Accept Feasibility Study for Lake Drive East and 184th Avenue Improvement
Project No. 89-6, Call Public Hearing
- Approve Plans and Specifications and Authorize Advertising for Bids for West
78th Street Detachment Improvement Project No. 87-2
- Approve Plans and Specifications for Audubon Court Improvement Project No.
89-7, Authorize Advertising for Bids
August 14, 1989
- Award of Bids, Sidewalk construction in Saddlebrook Subdivision, Project No.
87-15A
- Public Hearing, Lake Drive East and 184th Avenue Improvement Project No. 89-6
- Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications for Lake Drive East and
184th Avenue Improvement Project No. 89-6
- Award of Bids, Audubon Court Improvement Project No. 89-7
- Public Hearing, Utility and Roadway Improvements to Frontier Trail from
Highland Drive to Kiowa, Project No. 89-10
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
FUTURE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS
ENGINEERING
Page 2
August 14, 1989 (continued)
- Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications for Utility and Roadway
Improvements to Frontier Trail from Highland Drive to Kiowa, Project No. 89-10
- Authorize Feasibility Study for Upgrade of Audubon Road from Soo Line
Railroad to Lyman Boulevard
August 28, 1989
- Award of Bids, West 78th Street Detachment Improvement Project No. 87-2
September 11, 1989
- Accept Feasibility Study for Upgrade of Audubon Road from Soo Line Railroad
to Lyman Boulevard, Improvement Project No. , Call Public Hearing
September 25, 1989
- Public Hearing, Upgrade of Audubon Road from Soo Line Railroad to Lyman
Boulevard, Improvement Project No.
- Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications for Upgrade of Audubon
Road from Soo Line Railroad to Lyman Boulevard, Improvement Project No. __
November 6, 1989
- Approve Plans and Specifications and Authorize Advertising for Bids for
Upgrade of Audubon Road from Soo Line Railroad to Lyman Boulevard,
Improvement Project No.
Future Agenda Items - Date Unknown
- Accept Specifications for Utility Telemetry System
- Approve Development Contract for Bluff Creek Greens
- Consider Establishment of Storm Water Drainage Utility
- Award of Bids, Upgrade of Audubon Road from Soo Line Railroad to Lyman
Boulevard, Improvement Project No. (January, 1990)
CONSULTANTS PLEASE NOTE: Reports are due in engineering no later than 10 days
prior to the City Council meeting date, i.e. Friday.
Copies to:
City Hall Department Heads Bill Engelhardt, Engelhardt & Associates
Karen Engelhardt, Office Manager City Council Administrative Packet
Kim Meuwissen, Eng. Secretary Gary Ehret, BRW
Fred Hoisington
4, 7,
C I TY 0 F �__,
G c j'<' c�' f'`,
....
y� \
[c.... _
.. ,
_ _ ,... ,
mss `.:
_,
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
MEMORANDUM
TO: Scott Harr, Asst. Public Safety Director
FROM: Ron Julkowski, Building Official •,
DATE: June 19, 1989
SUBJ: "Don't Take It Personally" Workshop
On June 14th, I attended a workshop at the College of St. Thomas.
The half day workshop consisted of ways to not become so defen-
sive when confronted with a complaint or a question. It was a
very interesting class. The benefit I received from it was
that everyone does take it personally and in doing so hurts pro-
ductivity and our working relationship with our co-workers. An
outline of the 8 basic steps to follow are in the attached work-
book.
I would recommend that all City Staff take this course to help us
understand that when we do receive a complaint or criticism that
there are ways to avoid a defensive confrontation and not to take
it personally.
"if low
183 University Ave.East
St.Paul,MN 55101-2526
League of Minnesota Cities (612)227-5600(FAX:221-0986)
June 23, 1989
Mr. James Chaffee
Chief of Police
690 Coulter Drive
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Dear Mr. Chaffee:
I want to take this opportunity to thank you for your recent
participation in the League of Minnesota Cities annual conference.
Your contribution to the program was excellent.
Many city officials commented on the quality of presentations. If
the evaluations are an accurate reflection, and I'm sure they are,
this year's program was truly a tremendous success.
Again, on behalf of the Board of Directors and our city officials,
please accept our gratitude for your contribution.
Sincerely,
AtaktiaJez
Donald A. Slater
Executive Director
DAS:ctd
rc�:.i;ctv�p
JUN 2 6 1989
Cfl1!OF CHANHASgFA
/9.4 s -
Hoisington Group Inc. ee �``�� '`l°'`
Land Use Consultants MEMO
To: Herb Mason, Peggy Reilly, Jack Anderson,
Jim Lasher & Don Ashworth
From: Fred Hoisington
Subject: Meeting with Peggy Reilly on 6-29-89
Re: Colonial Shopping Center Facade Improvements
Date: 6-30-89
I first explained the HRA's concern for the lack of proposed
improvements to the east and west elevations of Colonial Center. The
HRA asked the Staff to come back with some alternatives ,to the
painting of the two building sides. Jack Anderson then explained the
alternatives that he developed including, bricking of both sides of the
building and, alternatively, the lap-siding of the building's ends. He
also showed a future treatment of the west-end of Colonial Center
which included glass, brick and the exlention of the canopy. We all
agreed that it would be premature to develop the west side of the
building until we know what Kenny's is going to do and who the new
future tenants are likely to be. It was agreed that the west-end of
the building should be painted as per the plans and that brick or lap-
siding not be applied to that elevation until we know the plans for
occupancy of that end of the building.
We also agreed that we should give consideration to lap-siding
treatment of the east side of the building at a cost of between
_'' $10,000 and $12,000.
Peggy inquired about the easement that CHADDA is attempting to
acquire at the rear of the building and explained her concerns for the
appearance of the building should any number of motorists utilized
that as access. She expressed concern because it looks bad and asked
if there was some way we could clean up the back of the building
including the screening of the dumpsters and rear entries? Jack
indicated that he would look at that to include as an add alternate to
the parent bid package.
7300 Metro Blvd. Kc:CE1VED
Suite 525
Edina, MN 55435 JUL S 1989
(612)835-9960
7. -
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
I explained to Peggy our concerns about replacing the windows with
mullions and indicated that we would prefer to use solid panes of
glass. She agreed wholeheartedly that solid panes would be
preferred. I went on to explain that we intended to remove two of
the existing columns and Peggy agreed that those should be
removed.
i
We then talked about signage on the building and it was agreed that
we would use individual back-lit letters for signage rather than the
signage that has been proposed todate. Peggy indicated that we
should meet with the tenants and try to resolve signing issues but •
that the sign below the main entry should read Colonial Center. We
also talked about the appropriateness of the maple leaf and it was
agreed that the symbol or image above the main entry should
correlate with the pylon. sign that is proposed for the corner of Great
Plains Boulevard and West 78th Street.
We explained that there is an air conditioner that sticks out of one of
the windows in the pizza parlor and Peggy indicated that it would
have to be relocated. We agreed that it should be a roof-top unit and
that it would be the responsibility of the owners of the center to take
care of that relocation.
We also talked about all of the cabinetry, etc. that presently exists on
the sidewalk including a pop machine, a propane gas storage case, a
cable TV collection box and a salt/sand barrel. Peggy agreed that all
of those things would have to go as part of the building's renovation.
That also is a subject to be discussed with the tenants.
We then talked about the proposed , pylon sign and Jill Lashe
presented various alternatives, some with, and others without,
smaller tenant signs attached. Peggy agreed that we shoud use the
sixteen (16) foot tall pylon with a closed base and no individual.
tenant signs. She went on to indicate that the colors of the lettering
should approximate those of the present brick on the building and
that the base also should be constructed of brick rather than stone.
I explained that the relatively small changes in the facade as
discussed (elimination of columns and signage) are included in the
2
itj
not-to-exceed $110,000 agreement between Chanhassen Realty and
the City of Chanhassen. I went on to explain that we would like to
pull the wall signage out of the building contract to save general
contractor overhead costs. We would like to combine that signage
with the new pylon sign contract. This may require some
modification of the facade improvement contract or at least an
understanding that it is being reduced by the cost of the wall
signage.
I explained that the major improvements (improvements to the east
elevation of the building, the screening of the dumpstei's and the
pylon sign) are not part of the original agreement and that we might
expect some cost sharing for these additional items. She indicated
that we would have to talk with Herb and Don in that regard.
I then spoke with Don Ashworth later, in the day regarding a cost
sharing agreement and we decided that an equitable distribution of
costs might be as follows:
1. That the HRA pay for the cost of the pylon sign (estimated at
$9,000-$10,000).
2. That Colonial Center be responsible for all costs associated with
screening of the rear of the building (no cost estimate).
3. That the east elevation improvements be equitably split between
Colonial Center and the HRA.
:a,.. _ If we are going to include these changes, an addendum to the original
contract will be in order. There are -,also a couple of other minor
changes to the two agreements that 'I have spoken with Spence
Kluegel about which will not change the present arrangement but
will require that some language be removed from the City contract
and added to the HRA Special Assessment agreement.
3
FACT United States
Silt Fences Department of
Agriculture
SHEET
SOIL
CONSERVATION
ENG- 1 November 1987 SERVICE
Intent This Fact Sheet is not intended to replace the information contained in the Soil
Conservation Service Technical Guide. It is intended to provide general
information on this practice.
Purpose Silt fences are temporary sediment control measures installed on the contour
to intercept and detain sediment from small unprotected areas. Silt fences are
constructed by attaching a synthetic filter fabric to supporting posts.The
bottom of the fabric is anchored in a trench to prevent water and sediment
from passing underneath the silt fence.
Silt fences may be used where: (1)the drainage area is less than 2 acres; (2)
the maximum slope length above the silt fence is 150 feet; and (3)water
reaches the silt fence as sheet flow without significant concentrations. Silt
fences should not be used in channels,waterways or other concentrated flow
paths.The useful life of a silt fence is generally no more than one construction
season.
When properly installed and maintained,silt fences are effective sediment
barriers.They should be used only below unprotected areas where it is
impractical to prevent erosion.
Design Silt fences should be installed on the contour,and constructed so runoff
Considerations cannot bypass the ends. If the silt fence is longer than 600 feet, the silt fence
should be constructed in separate, independent units, with each unit having a
length less than 600 feet.
-
Silt fences may be constructed with supporting fences, such as snow fences
or wire mesh fences.The supporting fences should be strong enough to
withstand the load from ponded water and trapped sediment.The support
posts should be spaced at 10 feet or less,and should be placed or driven at
least 2 feet into the ground. Posts should be 4-inch diameter wood posts or
standard T-or U-section steel posts weighing not less than 1.3 pounds per
lineal foot,with a minimum length of 30 inches plus burial depth.
When a silt fence is installed without a supporting fence,the posts should be
spaced at 4 feet or less. Posts should be placed or driven at least 2 feet into
the ground. Posts should be 2-inch square or heavier wood posts or standard
T-or U-section steel posts weighing not less than 1.0 pound per lineal foot,
with a minimum length of 30 inches plus burial depth.
-41 B-
A trench for anchoring the fabric is dug along the upslope side of the posts.
The trench should be about 6 inches wide and 6 inches deep. The fabric is
laid in the trench,which is then backfilled and compacted.
The filter fabric should be furnished in a continuous roll cut to the length of the
silt fence to avoid splices.When splices are necessary,the fabric should be
spliced at a support post with a minimum 6 inch overlap,folded over, and
securely fastened.
The synthetic filter fabric should be a pervious sheet of propylene, nylon,
polyester or ethylene yarn uniform in texture and appearance and free from
defects,flaws or tears that would affect its physical properties.The fabric
should meet or exceed the following requirements:
Property Test Method Requirement
Grab Strength* ASTM-D-1682 90 lbs. min.
Elongation* ASTM-D-1682 15% min.to
50% max. at
45 pounds
Permittivity ASTM-D-4491 0.01 sec.-'
Equiv. Opening Size , CW02215 20 to 80
(Corps of Eng.) Sieve No.
Ultraviolet Resistance , ASTM-D-4355 70% min.
Width 36 in. min.
*12" per min. strain rate
Maintenance Silt fences require maintenance to preserve their effectiveness.All silt fences
should be inspected immediately after each runoff event and at least daily
during prolonged rainfall.Any required repairs should be made immediately.
When sediment deposits reach approximately one-half the height of the silt
fence,the sediment should be removed or a second silt fence should be
installed.
For More Contact the local Soil Conservation Service(SCS)or Soil and Water
Information Conservation District in your county.
(This fact sheet was produced by the Soil Conservation Service in cooperation with Soil and Water Conservation Districts in
Minnesota)
All programs and services of the Soil Conservation Service are offered on a nondiscriminatory basis,without regard to race,color,national origin,religion,sex,
age,marital status,or handicap.
-42B-
. J
2 acres ��
Maximum drainage area `
'
- \�2'
Top of hill-�/ '
. — �.
e•
.e"..*°°....1\ '?o , • „ —
. •/ es 'S'/
/ S ■ /.-r
��•.c';9' /
. >i/
� Vii:i
l
1. Set posts and excavate a 6"x6" 2. Staple wire fencing to
trench upslope along the line the posts.
of posts.
4 10' max i■■■■s;-: Ii _\h
` - `- -.- . � '— %-, ; k - 3 -1.
11 lt,T! , '�' i11 --
6). ..„ - -
3. Attach the filter fabric to 4. Backfill and compact the
::,:K: .. ..Ill: ..: - ; ..;LE •---•-..-Z;:.
IR the wire fence and extend it excavated soil .
into the trench.
WV-
. ,i%� iii, I'
Extension of fabric and .
wire into the trench.
Filter Fabric
1111�!I'(I �'_ ,a. - ._ re 1
• != ;iii1;=_-!, ,L
= ,7,=4;,111 1= i
CONSTRUCTION OF SILT FENCE WITH S 7PORTING WIRE FENCE
Source: Adapted from Installation of Straw and Fabric
Filter Barriers for Sediment Control , Sherwood
and Wyant
i
-44B-
United States
FACT Sediment IQ Department of
' Agriculture
Basin
SHEET
SOIL
E N G-8 SERVICE ATION
November 1987
Intent This fact sheet is not intended to replace information contained in the
appropriate standard (350—Sediment Basin) in the SCS Technical Guide. It is
intended to provide basic information on use of sediment basins.
Purpose To detain sediment-laden runoff from small disturbed areas long enough to
allow the majority of the sediment to settle out.A sediment basin is a small
ponding area usually formed by constructing an earthen embankment with an
outlet across a swale.
Sediment basins are effective for removing suspended solids.They may also
detain smaller percentages of organic material.
Design The capacity of a sediment basin must be compatible with its life expectancy.
It must be large enough to store the sediment that is expected to accumulate.
It also must have sufficient storage to hold water from the design storm. Some
sediment basins have a permanent pool and some are designed to be dry.
The water must be held long enough to allow the sediment to drop out. The
outlet structure or principal spillway must allow slow, but steady outflow.This
may be a rock outlet or a pipe outlet. (See Figures 1 and 2.) Figure 3 indicates
the general configuration for the structure with sediment and water storage.
The embankment cross-section must be designed considering soil
mechanics and slope stability.The sediment basin should be designed for a
storm frequency consistent with the hazard involved to life and property. An
emergency spillway is needed for the passage of large events which exceed
the structure capacity.This will protect the structure from total failure. Figure 4
shows the suggested layout for the emergency spillway.
A temporary sediment basin can be integrated into a development as a
permanent retention basin.On-site detention is usually aimed at correcting a
water quantity problem but it can also enhance water quality. In some cases,
existing structures can be adapted.
The efficiency of a sediment basin is increased if the distance from the point
of inflow to the outlet structure is maximized.This may necessitate using one
or more baffles to lengthen the flow path of the water. Efficiency is improved
by a longer detention time,which is a result of reducing the outlet discharge
or increasing the storage capacity.
Fencing and other safety measures should be installed as necessary to
protect the public from floodwater and soft sediment. It is wise to consider
visual resource management.
-90B-
Maintenance This will vary by individual site, related to soil type and life of the structure.The
basin's life can be extended by periodic cleaning of the sediment basin.
For More Contact the local Soil Conservation Service(SCS)or Soil and Water
Information Conservation District(SWCD) in your county.
Flo w
\\. (
Earth dike •' o ..b` 1 �\ \\
J x \\
—1
L
C ;•c'
0 O oh
a 0co 0° 0
O
• - - —\
\ j \ \
Stone
Figure 1. Rock Outlet for Sediment Basin
(This fact sheet was produced by the Soil Conservation Service in cooperation with Soil and Water Conservation Districts in '
Minnesota)
AU programs and services of the Soil Conservation Service are offered on a nondiscriminatory basis,without regard to race,color,national origin,religion,sex,
age,marital status,or handicap.
-91B-
•
A&W,
•
•
/MLNL.v 4oli�u
k
'•1� � 4 t2 r y!L 410^a t:,Nwwi(l '. lrfw .1;.ors
' 'jsC�nvaly afioilitlA�1 c orm%)
I . .' � .0•�•yi. wr3 - ."'� -_ , Y - 1 V MI 4::fJ IOIti:3
fi ice%''f/>� "'!yb'-•rtctb — ..3! .y.:�, -�
FL�����Aifi.,2��'. - •�^+r a '!..*`.-... �I-,..k .(_-.'3ii_ —
• -• dw.U,i •
'�•a1 AICC fle
X'A.L' ;4 rr)MA,V OhN•r . •'v-�v
4,f4.44 #41 ;LW OkT:C.Lir .e l V•04 .'r �1
•1441/1
•
PROrIL0 ThIMUOM Nr IUL EM9kN1. VT rer.:IM5Sr eAsist
•
Figure 2. Pipe outlet for sediment basin.
MINIMUM STORAGE VOLUME AND SEDIMENT STORAGE
"-I Flood water
• Storage
//Aft
imriv Dewatering
Sediment `���7•0,4�ew.*4 �1� Outlet
Storage and
Permanent Pool
Source: VaSWCC
Figure 3. Configuration of sediment basin.
•
-92B-
Emergency Spillway
Emergency spillway . •
should not be .•
•••
constructed „• •:. ,• •„.!..;
over fill
material . .:•.. •:• :.•: . .•
. f Fill
:is• :;"/ft • 1." .;/;:
.; ..... •
i.;;• .!„ . .;L
tab t PO
"'-'
•• • • •.•••....•••••••.•••• .:•
••••.••. .• ••,...•
:11; • •
'Source: Va SWCC
Figure 4. Emergency Spillway for Sediment Basin
-93B-
co- ALA(
CITY OF 7%
\ cHANBAssE.N
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
June 21, 1989
Mr. Rob Tautges
Voto, Tautges , Redpath and Company
P.O. Box 10678
White Bear Lake, MN 55110
Re: Forfeited Property - Public Safety
Dear Rob:
Attached please find a memorandum prepared by myself restating
the forfeited property concern raised in the 1988 Management
Report.
Also attached is the response received from our Public Safety
Director Jim Chaffee. In essence, Jim is stating that the City
does not take control of either the 'seized property or the assets
with all of such being under the joint powers agreement with
Southwest Metro Drug Task Force. If I have Jim prepare a resolution
stating that this is our policy, will such suffice for your pur-
poses?
Sincerely,
1)/9-1, afri:Lcik,va
Don Ashworth
City Manager
DA:/X
Enclosures
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
MEMORANDUM
TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager
FROM: Jim Chaffee, Public Safety Director
DATE: June 13 , 1989
SUBJ: Forfeited Property - Public Safety
Although state law does not require procedures to be in place
regarding forfeited property by local agencies , I do agree with
the auditor that it is a good idea to have a procedure in place
whereby funds or even assets seized may be properly disposed of
or added to our fixed asset records. While we have been par-
ticipating in the joint powers arrangement with the Southwest
Metro Drug Task Force, we have seized numerous automobiles and a
large amount of cash and have implemented forfeiture procedures
against same. We are selling the seized assets in order to
supplement our operating budget for the Southwest Metro Drug Task
Force and in certain cases have used the forfeited automobiles
for our continuing operations .
At some point in time, however, the City may take over control of
these assets and/or seized monies and at that time a procedure
should be in place with the Finance Department as to best utilize
these funds for their intended purposes . You will note that in
Minnesota Statute 609 . 5315 , Subdivision 3 , it states that property
kept under this section may be used only in the performance of
official duties of the appropriate agency or prosecuting agency
and may not be used for any other purpose. Proceeds from the
sale of property kept under this subdivision must be dispersed as
provided in Subdivision 5. You will also note that under this
same statute, Subdivision 5 it states that 70% of the money or
proceeds from the sale of forfeited property must be forwarded to
the appropriate agency for deposit as a supplement to its
operating fund or similar fund for use in law enforcement.
Summary
Once again, it is not a state law or mandate that a procedure or
resolution be in place governing the disposition of seized or
forfeited assets or cash. While we are continuing to seize
Mr. Don Ashworth
June 13 , 1989 be
Page 2
assets and cash in our operations through the Southwest Metro K
Drug Task Force, we are funneling these forfeited funds back into a•
the daily operations of the unit. Again, at some point in time t t
it may be beneficial for the Public Safety Department to take
control of some of the assets and/or money, but at this point we
are continuing to funnel the funds back into the day-to-day )1
operations. Z;
I will continue to research this issue and seek out information r
from neighboring cities as to their handling of seized or for-
s:
feited assets.
A
3
10208 10209 CRIMINAL CODE OF 1963 609.5315
ce or real property encum- (1) all money, precious metals, and precious stones found in proximity to:-
ofthe secured party unless (i) controlled substances;
it omission upon which the
;rs the burden of establish- (ii) forfeitable drug manufacturing or distributing equipment or devices; or
(iii) forfeitable records of manufacture or distribution of controlled substances;
is not subject to forfeiture and
;e of the unlawful use or (2) all conveyance devices containing controlled substances with a retail value of
took reasonable steps to $500 or more.
(b) A claimant of the property bears the burden to rebut this presumption.
ind research products and Subd. 2. Administrative forfeiture procedure. Forfeiture of property descnbed in
it are used,or intended for ;;ubdivision 1 is governed by this subdivision. When seizure occurs, or within a
forfeiture, reasonable time after that, all persons known to have an ownership or possessory
proceeds derived from or interest in seized property must be notified of the seizure and the intent to forfeit the
?rfeiture. property. In the case of a motor vehicle required to be registered under chapter 168,
notice mailed by certified mail to the address shown in department of public safety
records is deemed sufficient notice to the registered owner. Notice may otherwise be
given in the manner provided by law for service of a summons in a civil action. The
) WITH DESIGNATED notice must be in writing and contain:
(1) a description of the property seized;
)nal property is subject to (2) the date of seizure;
:ilitate the commission of (3) notice of the right to obtain judicial review of the forfeiture; and '
d personal, that represent are subject to forfeiture, (4) notice of the procedure for obtaining judicial review of the forfeiture.
Substantially the following language must appear conspicuously: "IF YOU DO
1 with designated offenses. NOT DEMAND JUDICIAL REVIEW EXACTLY AS PRESCRIBED IN MINNESO-
TA STATUTES, SECTION 609.5314, SUBDIVISION 3, YOU LOSE THE RIGHT
only if the owner of the TO A JUDICIAL DETERMINATION OF THIS FORFEITURE AND YOU LOSE
ANY RIGHT YOU MAY HAVE TO THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY."
)n of a designated offense.
;on only if the owner was Subd. 3. Judicial determination. (a)Within 60 days following service of a notice
d,or the act or omission of seizure and forfeiture under this section,a claimant may file a demand for a judicial
determination of the forfeiture. The demand must be in the form of a civil complaint
4 and must be filed with the court administrator in the county in which the seizure
t is subject to the interest occurred, together with proof of service of a copy of the complaint on the county
consented to the act or attorney for that county, and the standard filing fee for civil actions. No responsive
.g a security interest bears pleading is required of the county attorney and no court fees may be charged for the
;rig evidence. county attorney's appearance in the matter. The proceedings are governed by the rules
3
not subject to forfeiture of civil procedure.
the act or omission upon = (b) The complaint must be captioned in the name of the claimant as plaintiff, the
took reasonable steps to seized property as defendant,and must state with specificity the grounds on which the
claimant alleges the property was improperly seized and stating the plaintiff's interest
1 in the property seized. Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, an action for the
i return of property seized under this section may not be maintained by or on behalf of
EDURE. any person who has been served with a notice of seizure and forfeiture unless the person
609.5312 is governed by has complied with this subdivision.
property stating the act, (c) If the claimant makes a timely demand for judicial determination under this
_late and place of the act subdivision,the appropriate agency must conduct the forfeiture under section 609.531,
.ossessor of the property subdivision 6a.
rust be captioned in the History: 1988 c 665 s 14
nee as plaintiff and the
609.5315 DISPOSITION OF FORFEITED PROPERTY. ,
Subdivision 1. Disposition. If the court finds under section 609.5313 or 609.5314
that the property is subject to forfeiture, it may order the appropriate agency to:
v PROPERTY SEIZED (1) sell property that is not required to be destroyed by law and is not harmful to
'_S SEIZURE. the public and distribute the proceeds under subdivision 5;
e;presumption. (a)The (2) take custody of the property and remove it for disposition in accordance with
ure under this section: law;
3
i s 0 609.5315 CRIMINAL CODE OF 1963
,,:,.' .' __ 1020
.,:.4..:,,p,-.;:i.-
-, (3) forward the property to the federal drug enforcement administration `•'
,, (4) disburse money as provided under subdivision 5; or
s p- (5) keep property other than money for official use by the agency and the prosecut• t
ing agency.
�t�°r=�° Subd. 2. Disposition of administrative) forfeited roe ')'
-.N.: administratively under section 609.5314 and no demand for judicial determination is
"" X: made, the appropriate agency may dispose of the property in any of the ways listed in r.
` ; subdivision 1.
-f'-?ice ' Subd. 3. Use by law enforcement. Property kept under this section may be used
_:',',-1,'4,-..t,-_s only in the performance of official duties of the appropriate agency or prosecuting f al
':'_„;..:4;:-.4:t4:...';, agency and may not be used for any other purpose. Proceeds from the sale of property 4 cc
- -. `T kept under this subdivision must be disbursed as provided in subdivision 5.
- :.-- ",?,N _ Subd. 4. Distribution of proceeds of the offense. Property that consists of proceeds i'
— }x,'_ derived from or traced to the commission of a designated
=°;"q v.` ° gnated offense must be applied first
=`'r' to payment of seizure, storage, forfeiture,and sale expenses, and to satisfy valid liens th
`'` against the property; and second, to any court-ordered restitution before being dis- of
,„: bursed as provided under subdivision 5. as
't = Subd. 5. Distribution of money. Seventy percent of the money or proceeds from ; ac
r-=, the sale of forfeited property, after payment of seizure, storage, forfeiture, and sale l�
expenses,and satisfaction of valid liens against the property,must be forwarded to the # ■
appropriate agency for deposit as a supplement to its operating fund or similar fund i `I'
..,'.14.4't for use in law enforcement, and 20 percent must be forwarded to the county attorney i
. .sue, "-
. -::0:-A,.:- or other prosecuting agency that handled the forfeiture for deposit as a supplement to
*• its operating:.:-.. _- p rating fund or similar fund for prosecutorial purposes. The remaining ten
'=='4' ' percent of the money or proceeds must be forwarded within 60 days after resolution
-.=``=.y,
'S ` of the forfeiture to the state treasury and credited to the crime victim and witness
",= account established under section 609.101. Any local police relief association orga-
_
- nized under chapter 423,which received or was entitled to receive the proceeds of any
• ,, :1_ • sale made under this section before the effective date of Laws 1988, chapter 665,
:': -�_ sections 1 to 17, shall continue to receive and retain the proceeds of these sales.
History: 1988 c 665 s 15
t: tF. 609.5316 SUMMARY FORFEITURES.
"' Subdivision 1. Contraband. If the property is contraband, the property must be
i- -" ?. summarily forfeited and either destroyed or used by the appropriate agency for law
.r:f enforcement purposes.
'4 Subd. 2. Controlled substances. (a)Controlled substances listed in schedule I that
are possessed, transferred, sold, or offered for sale in violation of chapter 152, are
; : contraband and must be seized and summarily forfeited. Controlled substances listed
in schedule I that are seized or come into the possession of peace officers, the owners
--, of which are unknown, are contraband and must be summarily forfeited.
(b) Species of plants from which controlled substances in schedules I and II may
,° be derived that have been planted or cultivated in violation of chapter 152 or of which
'°` the owners or cultivators are unknown, or that are wild growths, may be seized and °'
summarily forfeited to the state. The appropriate '
ppropriate agency or its authorized agent may it
seize the plants if the person in occupancy or in control of land or premises where the
plants are growing or being stored fails to roduce an appropriate ppropriate registration or proof
that the person is the holder of appropriate registration.
F,. Subd. 3. Weapons. Weapons used are contraband and must be summarily
forfeited to the appropriate agency upon conviction of the weapon's owner or possessor i
for any offense of this chapter. Notwithstanding this subdivision, weapons used may
be forfeited without a conviction under sections 609.531 to 609.5315.
; ..
History: 1988 c 665 s 16
-
i
- IlIllIIMllI—— -'
e,�, ,1,q, :t- _
• ■: $'Er` ',.r::i e'n� " `" ti" ''."- -`
10210 1021 i CRIMINAL CODE OF 1963 609.532
administration; - S 19.532 ATTACHMENT OF DEPOSITED FUNDS.
Subdivision 1. Attachment. Upon application by the prosecuting authority, a
ency and the prosecut. court may issue an attachment order directing a financial institution to freeze some or
of the funds or assets deposited with or held by the financial institution by or on
If property is forfeited behalf of an account holder charged with the commission of a felony.
.iicial determination is Subd. 2. Application. The application of the prosecuting authority required by
•
y of the ways listed in 4'1 this section must contain:
(1) a copy of a criminal complaint issued by a court of competent jurisdiction that
•
,s section may be used lieges the commission of a felony by the account holder;
agency or prosecuting (2) a statement of the actual financial loss caused by the account holder in the
:m the sale of property commission of the alleged felony, if not already stated in the complaint; and
ubdivision 5. -•,,! (3) identification of the account holder's name and financial institution account
at consists of proceeds number.
e must be applied first Subd. 3. Issuance of a court order. If the court finds that(1)there is probable cause
d to satisfy valid liens that the account holder was involved in the commission of a felony; (2) the accounts
Lion before being dis- of the account holder are specifically identified:(3)there was a loss of$10,000 or more
as a result of the commission of the alleged felony;and(4)it is necessary to freeze the
mey or proceeds from account holder's funds or assets to ensure eventual restitution to victims of the alleged
e, forfeiture, and sale offense,the court may order the financial institution to freeze all or part of the account
st be forwarded to the '•solder's deposited funds or assets so that the funds or assets may not be withdrawn or
; fund or similar fund disposed of until further order of the court.
'o the county attorney Subd. 4. Duty of financial institutions. Upon receipt of the order authorized by
sit as a supplement to this section,a financial institution must not permit any funds or assets that were frozen
. The remaining ten by the order to be withdrawn or disposed of until further order of the court.
days after resolution Subd. 5. Release of funds. (a)The.account holder may,upon notice and motion,
ie victim and witness have a hearing to contest the freezing of funds or assets and to seek the release of all
lief association orga- or part of them.
e the proceeds of any (b) The account holder is entitled to an order releasing the freeze by showing:
s 1988, chapter 665, (1) that the account holder has posted a bond or other adequate surety,guarantee-
ds of these sales. ing that, upon conviction, adequate funds or assets will be available to pay complete
restitution to victims of the alleged offense;
(2) that there is no probable cause to believe that the account holder was involved
in the alleged offense;
the property must be (3) that the amount of funds or assets frozen is more than is necessary to pay
priate agency for law complete restitution to all victims of the alleged offense;
(4) that a joint account holder who is not involved in the alleged criminal activity
sted in schedule I that has deposited all or part of the funds or assets; or
n of chapter 152, are (5) that the funds or assets should be returned in the interests of justice.
:sled substances listed (c) It is not grounds for the release of funds or assets that the particular accounts
:e officers, the owners frozen do not contain funds or assets that were proceeds from or used in the commis-
forfeited. sion of the alleged offense.
:hedules I and II may Subd 6. Disposition of funds. (a)'If the account holder is convicted of a felony
apter 152 or of which or a lesser offense,the funds or assets may be used to pay complete restitution to victims
:s, may be seized and of the offense. The court may order the financial institution to remit all or part of the
authorized agent may frozen funds or assets to the court.
Ir premises where the
registration or proof (b) If the account holder is acquitted or the charges are dismissed, the court must
issue an order releasing the freeze on the funds or assets.
must be summarily Subd. 7. Time limit. The freeze permitted by this section expires 24 months after
I's owner or possessor the date of the court's initial attachment order unless the time limit is extended by the
n, weapons used may court in writing upon a showing of good cause by the prosecution.
5315. Subd. 8. Notice. Within ten days after a court issues an attachment order under
this section, the prosecutor shall send a copy of the order to the account holder's last
known address or to the account holder's attorney, if known.
History: 1987 c 217 s 1
•
_ t `
CITY 0 F
C I ANIIASSEN
AL.)
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
- (612) 937-1900
MEMORANDUM
TO: Gary Warren, City Engineer
FROM: Don Ashworth, City Manager
DATE: July 3 , 1989
SUBJ: Building Construction Escrow Fees
File No. PW214
Are you sure that "life will become a bit easier" with final
adoption of the proposed ordinance?
I agree, the following type of permits appear not to require a
permit fee: deck, roofing, remodeling, etc.
In looking at the above listing, I am reminded that many of our
worst stream and lake violations occurred as a result of
installation of decks/patios which involve significant rear yard
grading (Chaparral area, East Lotus Lake, Lake Riley) ; typically
the greatest amount of debris from a site is caused by the
roofer; and that any remodeling contracts will drag as much dirt
onto the roadway/generate debris as new single family construc-
tion. For the most part it is less , but the neighborhood is
established and therefore the complaints are even stronger even
though the actual problem is less. All in all I believe our
inspectors will have their hands full in trying to determine
which permit to charge the fee and which can be waived. No
matter what decision is made, an articulate citizen can assuredly
make the inspector look like an idiot , i .e. "Can you believe that
I was forced to establish a $500 erosion control fee before they
would let me install an American flagpole?" . They will typically
forget to mention that the entire front yard was proposed to be
re-landscaped.
Finance has a legitimate concern as to how to account for the
escrow fee. It was the accounting nightmare associated with
developer escrow fees to pay attorney services which finally led
the auditors to recommend that the process be replaced with a
straight fee schedule. My initial thought was to require the
applicant to make out two checks - one for the permit and a
separate $500 escrow check. The escrow check would sit in the
folder until occupancy or finaled. The check would be cashed if
Mr. Gary Warren
July 3 , 1989
Page 2
needed. "Insufficient funds" or "cancelled" could be overcome
through a cashiers check/letter of credit - both of which being
unacceptable to the applicant building a $300 deck. If the City
maintains the deposit in the form of "cash" , a question exists as
to the necessity to pay interest on that deposit.
All of the above questions will not be easily answered. I would
suggest a meeting between all parties involved shortly after the
draft is received, i .e. Public Safety Administration, Engineering
Administration, Ron/Steve/Carol/Karen, Finance, Attorney, and
myself. Please notify Karen when the draft has been received so
that she can start finding an open calendar spot accommodating
all.
Attachment
cc: Finance Department
Public Safety Department
City Attorney
Mayor and City Council
CITY
•
® F
NEAssEN
•t F
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
-� - (612) 937-1900
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jim Chaffee, Public Safety Director
FROM: Gary Warren, City Engineer
DATE: June 29 , 1989
S(JBJ: Building Construction Escrow
File No. PW214
Attached is a new paragraph drafted by the City Attorney and I at
the City Council ' s direction relating to the building construc-
tion escrow fee which is to be collected at the time of building
permit application. At this point in time , the South Lotus Villas
subdivision and Chanhassen Hills Third Addition are the only pro-
perties which require payment of this S500 fee. You will note in
the case of multi-unit, commercial or industrial applicants that
the fee is increased in proportion to the SAC units for each
application .
Finance needs to establish an accounting mechanism for receipt of
these funds and ultimate disbursements when the site has been
stabilized. I will be talking with Tom Chaffee and Jean
Meuwissen concerning this aspect in the near future.
Please be aware that an ordinance is being prepared to require
this fee to be paid on all new building permit applications.
When this is formally adopted life will become a bit easier since
all applications for building permits , excluding deck permits and
things of this nature, will be required to pay the escrow fee.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel
free to stop by.
Attachments
1 . Building construction escrow clause.
2 . Map for South Lotus Lake Villas .
3 . Map for Chanhassen Hills Third Addition.
c: Don Ashworth , City Manager
Tom Chaffee, Data Processing Coordinator
Jean Meuwissen, Treasurer
City Council Administrative Packet ( 7/10/89 )
CITY OF
•
C : AHAE= ANHASSEN
`\ 4 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
• (612) 937-1900
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jim Chaffee, Public Safety Director
FROM: Gary Warren, City Engineer
.4%
DATE: June 29 , 1989
SUBJ: Building Construction Escrow 4111111
File No. PW214
Attached is a new paragraph drafted by the City Attorney and I at
the City Council ' s direction relating to the building construc-
tion escrow fee which is to be collected at the time of building
permit application. At this point in time, the South Lotus Villas
subdivision and Chanhassen Hills Third Addition are the only pro-
perties which require payment of this $500 fee. You will note in
the case of multi-unit, commercial or industrial applicants that
the fee is increased in proportion to the SAC units for each
application .
Finance needs to establish an accounting mechanism for receipt of
these funds and ultimate disbursements when the site has been
stabilized. I will be talking with Tom Chaffee and Jean
Meuwissen concerning tais aspect in the near future.
Please be aware that an ordinance is being prepared to require
this fee to be paid on all new building permit applications .
When this is formally adopted life will become a bit easier since
all applications for building permits, excluding deck permits and
things of this nature, will be required to pay the escrow fee .
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel
free to stop by.
Attachments
1 . Building construction escrow clause.
2 . Map for South Lotus Lake Villas .
3 . Map for Chanhassen Hills Third Addition.
c: Don Ashworth, City Manager
Tom Chaffee, Data Processing Coordinator
Jean Meuwissen, Treasurer
City Council Administrative Packet ( 7/10/89 )
5. License. The Developer hereby grants the City , its
agents , employees , officers and contractors a license to enter
the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate
by the City in conjunction with plat development.
6 . Site Erosion Control. Before the site is rough
graded, and before any utility construction is commenced or
building permits are issued, the erosion control plan , Plan B,
shall be implemented , inspected, and approved by the City . The
City may impose additional erosion control requirements if they
would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and .
backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the
completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise pro-
vided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be certified seed
to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All
seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as
necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is
of the essence in controlling erosion . If the Developer does not
comply with the erosion control plan and schedule of supplemen-
tary instructions received from the City , the City may take such
action as it deems appropriate to control erosion at the
Developer ' s expense. The City will endeavor to notify the
Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the
City to do so will not affect the Developer ' s and City ' s rights
or obligations hereunder. No development will be allowed and no
building permits will be issued unless the plat is in full
compliance with the erosion control requirements . Erosion
control needs to be maintained until vegetative cover has been
restored, even if construction has been completed and accepted .
After the site has been stabilized to where, in the opinion of
the City, there is no longer a need for erosion control , the City
will remove the erosion control measures . Before the City signs
the final plat, the Developer shall pay the City a fee of $1 . 00
per foot of erosion control that is required to be constructed in
accordance with the erosion control plan for the plat, Plan B, to
cover the City ' s cost for removal .
7. Building Construction Escrow. Builders shall
comply with requirements and instructions received from City
officials and staff. Before building permits are issued for
homes or business establishments, the permit applicant shall post
a cash escrow of $500 . 00 per permit with the City Clerk. Multi-
unit residential or business establishments, i .e. commercial or
industrial applicants , shall pay an increased fee in proportion
to the S.A.C. units . The escrow shall be used to guarantee
compliance with City Ordinances , conditions of plat approval , and
other site specific requirements such as the maintenance of ero-
sion control measures , the clearing of dirt, debris and/or litter
from City streets and the surrounding area caused by the
builder 's activity, and to cover the repair of any damage caused
to streets , sidewalks , curbing and other City utilities. The
cash escrow may be used by the City to cure default. After the
construction activities have been completed and the site stabi-
lized, the cash escrow, less the funds used by the City to cure
default, shall be returned to the permit applicant.
GC-2
ritil
-- (\----
6 '
fir 4 /
//o ff �/
. t.11 s ti. \ °', „, \ ". „, '',,,, %\y
o11.
0
O-A c\
•
O
O•
O�
/ D C S
1 0 /
SOUTH LOTUS LAKE 2ND ADDITION
Iv ,,,.r.,c.,_,_:..:N I
(t.
\ L_____,I I I,_
2 \\ �, L I -- --Ji �L----I
I
, ,
,L,..,
...,
l i�� \ i --' (I--.------�\ \\ \v/ � \� '—JIT�i (::I��i :�/fir I 2 2
ZI 1 \ \ / / (//: /// \\� i��Y�---1--- J___
,........_
/ / I I % ' /_ \\ �/ / \ / y 1 3 3
r
ar)o I a �. • \ \\ / z
SCALE IN �, / / 1 28 Z: \ \ • �i' /^—�! • a
r 27 6 i
26 yJ :v ▪ // l 1 \\\ \\ 5 / I
5 25 ,..� __
24 •R �., �� �. C\ \ 6 /• 5 CD
P� � I i • =
�P' o I 8
2/ 6
• 15/ r j OJC
22 / 9 5
I I �\ 14 I / \J' '
21 8 12 ,\ 13 11 / \\� 9
.7, \---------6- -----;7 13
.,• / /�SF� ` 10
20 r2 P �P I I--....\----
5 \• -_—. Z\ -, 12\--
\ 18 13
4
V..,
14
18 -�
17
- 3 15
I LEGEND
2 L,,,t,6'
() MANIIOLE
O HYDRANT.
• - 1 (') GATE VALVE
\ 16 U CATCII BASIN
\ g \ / \ FLARED END
p
I IS \• 5�
e y Y 11 /,,� I4 . `.\L
Iz \ a .4.
5 • ; 13
` LYM-N COURT \\S
°�\\ I 2 `J
�J
S a:r 3 2 I 1 I
\\ \ / L
LYMAN BOULEVARD CHANHASSEN HILLS 3RD ADDITION
CL Ad o ri
-111089
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
"} 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
June 28 , 1989
Re: Water Tower Rehabilitation and Painting
File No. 89-9
Dear Property Owner:
This is just a quick note to inform you that the City Council has
awarded a contract to Odland Protective Coatings , Inc. for
rehabilitation and painting of the 100 , 000 gallon elevated
storage tank located on West 76th Street. We anticipate that the
construction will commence the week of July 10 , 1989 and will
extend for approximately a four-week period, weather permitting.
The elevated tank is proposed to be painted a white "cumulus"
color identical to the new reservoir located at County Road 17
and Lake Lucy Road. The Chanhassen name will be painted on both
the north and south sides of this tank consistent with the
letterhead style above .
The construction activity should be relatively unobtrusive to the
neighborhood with the exception of sandblasting activities which
will be conducted during the second and third weeks of the
construction period. The contractor is required to take all
necessary precautions to protect the surrounding properties .
Should you have any concerns regarding this matter or problems
during the construction, please call me at City Hall . Thank you
in advance for your cooperation and patience during this period.
Sincerely,
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
•
car G. Warren, P.E.
Direct.r of Public Works/City Engineer
GGW:ktm
c: Jerry Boucher , Utility Superintendent
r.
_ 110 0 cc ,ci lvi v. ,
seC-i_i Ott
CIIYOF
t
3 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
._, (612) 937-1900
June 26 , 1989 CERTIFIED MAIL
Argus Development
Attn: Mr. Joe Miller
President
18133 Cedar Avenue South
Farmington, MN 55024 .
Re: Powers Boulevard Detention Pond Failure
Lake Susan Hills West, Phase II
File No. 88-8 (pvt)
Dear Mr. Miller:
As you should be aware, since early May the City has been in con-
tact with you in an attempt to have repairs made and a baffle
outlet constructed on the detention pond along the west side of
Powers Boulevard just north of Lake Susan Hills Drive. On June
8 , 1989 , the City received a detail sheet from your engineers ,
Probe Engineering Company, and it was our understanding at that
time that the baffle outlet would be constructed within two
weeks . Inspections conducted June 26 , 1989 after our recent
rainstorm confirmed that no construction activity has taken place
to correct this site problem. Recent telephone calls to your
contractor have likewise resulted in no action.
The resolution and correction of this problem is of utmost
priority to the City since this ponding site provides one of the
last sedimentation barriers to the discharge to Lake Susan from
your development. I believe the City has been more than patient
in waiting for you to respond to this concern. Unfortunately,
since no action has been taken, we have no choice but to suspend
all issuance of building permits in Lake Susan Hills West, Phase
I and Phase II until such time as this problem has been
corrected. Further, if the baffled outlet weir is not
constructed and improvements made accordingly to this pond by
July 7 , 1989 , the City will take remedial action at your expense
in accordance with Article 6 of the development contract. I cer-
tainly hope that we can avoid this latter scenario; however, the
City is fully prepared to take this action if your corrective
matters are not completed by July 7, 1989 .
Mr. Joe Miller
June 26 , 1989
Page 2
On a related item, the site in general is in dire need of house-
keeping to clean up road dirt and debris in both Phase I and
Phase II. This is also covered under the development contract
obligations and I am seeking your cooperation in elimination of
the dirt and debris from the site, especially from the roadway
areas and County Road 17 .
Sincerely,
CITY OF CHAN ASSEN
e.ry G. Warren, P.E.
City E • ineer
GGW:ktm
c: Bob Kopp, Argus Development
Don Patton, Realty Center
Allan Larson, Sr . engineering Technician
J. M. Turner, Construction Mortgage Investors Co.
Don Ashworth, City Manager
Scott Harr, Code Enforcement Officer
CHANHASSEN H.R.A. A C C O U N T S P A Y A B L E 07-10-89 PAGE 1
CHECK # A M O U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P O S E
032458 1.500.00 BLOOMBERG COMPANIES. INC OTHER ACQUISITION COSTS
1 1.500.00 NECESSARY EXPENDITURES SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING
i
t
it i
w
kr
V
CHANHASSEN H.R.A. A C C O U N T S P A Y A B L E 07-10-89 PAGE 2
CHECK # A M O U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P O S E
038124 620.00 BROWN'S STANDARD FEES. SERVICE
038125 17.50 CITY OF CHANHASSEN UTILITIES
038126 13.00 MAUMA TRAVEL + TRAINING ,
038127 21.20 SW SUBURBAN PUBLISHING PRINTING AND PUBLISHING
038128 304.50 WESTCO. INC. PROMOTIONAL EXPENSE
5 976.20 CHECKS WRITTEN
TOTAL OF 6 CHECKS TOTAL 2.476.20
t
i
4
'V
^w/
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
.,._ 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Lori Sietsema, Park and Recreation Coordinator
DATE: June 30, 1989
SUBJ: Work Session on Lake Lucy Access
As per Council direction, I have scheduled a work session to
discuss boat access requirements and time lines for Lake Lucy.
As was also requested I have asked representatives from each
agency that has an interest in the access to attend. Specifi-
cally, the following people have been invited:
Mayor
City Council
Representative Becky Kelso
Senator Robert Schmitz
Mark Tomasek, PCA
Jim Anderson, PCA
Mike Markell, DNR Trails & Waterways
Duane Shodeen, DNR Fisheries
Ceil Strauss, DNR Hydrologist
Conrad Fiskness, Watershed
The meeting is scheduled for Thursday, July 6 , at 3 : 00 p.m. at
Chanhassen City Hall. Again, the agenda for this meeting is to
determine what will qualify as "adequate" access and to work out
a time schedule for acquisition and development. Discussion of
the Lake Riley Chain of Lakes Clean Up Project and the work plan
will be scheduled at another time.
Please call me as soon as possible if you are unable to attend
this meeting.
cc: L2on Ashworth, City Manager
Jo Ann Olsen, Senior Planner
Those noted above
Ehlers and Associates,Inc. NEIAISLETTER
LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE
A BI - MONTHLY PUBLICATION
OFFICES IN MINNEAPOLIS AND WAUKESHA
VOLUME 34.NUMBER 4
FILE: Financial Specialists: Ehlers and Associates,Inc.
Please distribute to governing body members
JULY. 1989
INTEREST RATES DROP
Bond prices continue to improve with the BBI (20 year, g.o., tax-exempt yields) down to 6.95% as of
June 12. Most of the improvement is attributable to the FED's manipulating lower interest rates to
reflect reduced concern about inflation. (Apparently five percent inflation has been institutionalized.)
Tax-exempt rates had not risen as much as taxables and fell faster because of dramatically reduced
supply.
SUPPLY OF TAX-EXEMPTS REDUCED
This is especially gratifying because we had been criticized by a New York writer for suggesting that
over supply had made tax-exemption an inefficient subsidy to local governments and could lead to loss
of tax-exemption. The same writer now talks about how efficient tax-exemption of municipal bond
interest has become with the reduced supply. The danger is that pressures on Congress will reinflate the
uses and supply of tax-exempt "public" finance.
REFINANCING WITH LOWER RATES
With reduced rates many issues are candidates for refunding. If you think your community's bonds are
eligible let us take a look without obligation - even if, especially if, - another consultant has examined
the possibility. We are super refunders.
SOME BONDS DO NOT REQUIRE ELECTIONS
We've worked closely with Independent School District #197 (West St. Paul) in funding the repair of
the now well-known vandalism. With the efforts of local lawmakers, the Legislature, and the Governor,
the District, along with other districts which may be similarly afflicted, obtained authority to issue
bonds by board resolution for health and safety (asbestos) needs. District#197 also secured a $500,000
grant. Superintendent Bruce Anderson, Director of Business Affairs Lois Rockney and Board members
are doing yeoman work restoring the school for fall occupancy. The bonds were issued at 6.49%.
THE VALUE OF COMPETITIVE BOND SALES
When are competitive bond sales appropriate? Answer: In practically every case. Many bonding bills
are drafted giving the option of selling bonds at private sale or competitively even though in other
purchases of consequence, except for personal service, local governments must solicit bids. Why
legislators feel that borrowing money should be an exception is a mystery. Underwriters say that some
bond issues are too complex, too small or too large to take to public sale and that they can get money
cheaper at private sale. The evidence is contrary: Private sales cost issuers about 1% higher interest
rates. On a $1 million, 20 year issue a 1% lower interest rate will save about $140,000. The solution is
to require that bond issues be first offered at public sale and, if that is unproductive or unsatisfactory,
then at private sale. We can help you compete.
2950 Norwest Center•90 South Seventh Street•Minneapolis. MN 55402-4100•612-339-8291• FAX 612-339-0854
TAX INCREMENT FINANCINGS: SOME DIFFER
Tax Increment Financing (TIF) is a valuable development tool but not all TIFs are the same.
Municipalities and counties may issue bonds to finance sites or improvements or reimburse the
developer for having advanced those costs. The risks and benefits to both the community and the
developer are quite different. And then there are tax-exempt and taxable TIF bonds. All of the
economic possibilities must be examined before entering any TIF project. Ehlers and Associates are
very good TIFers.
LEASE FINANCING
Direct leasing can be a way to finance important public improvements without elections but the interest
factor can be up to 2% higher than with bonds. Some underwriters see leasing as a way to finance
privately, without going to lower cost competitive sales. But we've lease-financed a number of projects
competitively using local non-profit corporations instead of leasing companies at interest rates
comparable with regular bond rates. We are excellent lease financers.
ARBITRAGE REGS. OUT
The 243 page, 2 5/8# arbitrage regulations are out but fully understood by few. In fact the regs may be a
fertile field for a whole new line of consulting. Local governments really didn't need all this federal
regulation. Some arbitrage is still available but issuers need to be aware of the limits. Ehlers and
Associates know their way thorugh the arbitrage thicket.
CONGRATULATIONS:
To Dilworth, Eveleth, Lake Benton, Mahnomen County, Morton, Ortonville, Sandstone and 4
Stewart - Ehlers clients receiving Small Cities Development Program Grant awards. To Foley and
Ogilvie School Districts who were awarded significant maximum effort capital loan funds by the
1989 Legislature following voter approval; to Glenwood/Starbuck/Villard School Districts who will
be receiving a $6,000,000 secondary facilities grant to help fund a tri-district high school; to the City of
Buffalo Lake for obtaining grants and loans to reactivate a meat processing plant; to
Watertown-Mayer School District whose voters approved a $6,000,000 building issue; to Decorah,
Iowa School District whose voters approved a$4,985,000 building issue.
It was great seeing so many at our open house. If you couldn't make it come in whenever you are near.
Norwest Center is a fabulous building.
And of course we saw so many of you at the recent conferences and conventions. They are special to us
because we do get to renew old friendships and meet new people coming into government.
With warmest personal regards,we are
Very truly yours,
EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
wit4tgiv3,
Robert L. Ehlers
SUMMARY OF AREA BOND SALES Bond
Net Buyer
Municlulity Date Type of Bonds Amount Malurijy Rate Index Rating
Iowa
Humboldt 04/05/89 Water Revenue Bonds $ 300M 1990-1998 7 17% 7.64% NR
Muscatine 04/06/89 G.O. Corporate Purpose Bonds 815M 1990-1999 7.10% 7.64% Al
Nevada 04/17/89 G.O. Library Bonds 600M 1990-2001 7 15% 7.54% Al
Tipton 04/17/89 G.O. Sewer Improvement Bonds 800M 1990-2004 7.21% 7.54% NR
Bondurant-Farrar Com. SD 04/18/89 Capital Loan Notes 350M 1990-1997 7 19% 7.54% Baal
Bondurant-Farrar Com. SD 04/18/89 G.O. School Bonds 2,720M 1990-2009 7.39% 7 54% Baal
Pella 04/18/89 G.O. Bonds 4,100M 1991-2005 7.14% 7 54% A
Adel-DeSoto Comm. S/D 04/24/89 G.O. School Bonds 4,950M 1990-2009 7 30% 7.44% A
Cedar Rapids Comm. S/D 04/27/89 G.O. School. Building Bonds 4,900M 1990-1999 6.84% 7.44% Aal
Altoona 05/01/89 Street Improvement Bonds 415M 1989-1998 9.36% 7.40% NR
Osage 05/01/89 G.O. Improvement Bonds 660M 1991-2005 7.24% 7 40% NR
Des Moines Area Comm. 05/09/89 New Jobs Training Certificates 2,990M 1991-1998 7.12% 7.36% Aa
College
State Board of Regents 05/10/89 Utility System Revenue Bonds 16,500M 1990-2013 6.75% 7.36% Al
Dubuque 05/15/89 G.O. Bonds 4,150M 1991-2000 6.70% 7.36% Aa
Nevada Community S/D 05/15/89 G.O. School Bonds 3,950M 1996-2008 7.08% 7.36% A
Rockwell City 05/15/89 G.O. Corporate Purpose Bonds 340M 1991-2005 7.04% 7.36% NR
Garner 05/16/89 Sewer Revenue Bonds 235M 1989-1998 6.95% 7.36% NR
Davenport 05/17/89 Taxable G.O. Corporate Bonds 3,525M 1990-2004 9.46% 7.36% Aa
Davenport 05/17/89 G.O. Corporate Bonds 4,400M 1990-2004 6.82% 7.36% Aa
Woodbury Central 05/23/89 G.O. School Bonds 3,100M 1990-2009 6.95% 7.18% MBIA
Community S/D
Des Moines 05/31/89 G.O. Bonds 12,500M 1991-2009 6.91% 7.11% Aaa/AA+
Ottumwa Community S/D 05/31/89 G.O. Anticipatory Warrants 2,250M 1990 6.59% 7 11% NR
Webster City Comm. S/D 05/31/89 G.O. Capital Loan Notes 1,440M 1990-2000 6.78% 7.11% NR
Minnesota.
/ Fergus Falls Port Auth. 04/03/89 Taxable G.O. Bonds 645M 1991-2000 10.12% 7.64% A
Freeborn County 04/04/89 G.0 Capital Improvement Bonds 1,000M 1991-2006 7.28% 7.64% Al
I S.D. #270 Hopkins 04/06/89 G.O. School Building Bonds 4,625M 1992-2004 7.16% 7.64% Al
Melrose 04/06/89 G.O. Sewer Revenue Bonds 450M 1990-2001 7.17% 7.64% Baal
Lamberton 04/11/89 Gross Revenue Nursing Home Bonds 505M 1990-2005 8 19% 7 56% NR
Virginia 04/11/89 G.O. Tax Increment Refunding Bonds 985M 1991-2008 7 47% 7 56% Baa
Virginia 04/11/89 G.O. Tax Increment Refunding Bonds 1,790M 1994-2008 7.47% 7.56% Baa
Alexandria Lake Area 04/12/89 G.0-Sewer Interceptor Bonds 400M 1991-2000 7.01% 7.56% A
Sanitary Distict
Alexandria Lake Area 04/12/89 G.O. Improvement Bonds 620M 1991-2010 7.34% 7 56% A
Sanitary District
Big Lake 04/17/89 G.O. Advance Ref. & Impr. Bonds 1.135M 1991-2002 8.00% 7 54% Ba
Credit River 04/17/89 G.0 Improvement Bonds 200M 1991-2010 7 67% 7 54% NR
I.S.D. #466 Dassel-Cokato 04/17/89 G.O. School Building Bonds 5,000M 1991-2010 7 35% 7.54% MBIA
Minnesota State 04/18/89 State University System Fund Bonds 1,550M 1990-2019 10 05% 7 54% MBIA
University Board (Taxable Insured Series 19896)
Minnesota State 04/18/89 State University System Fund Bonds 18,450M 1990-2019 7.33% 7 54% MBIA
University Board (Tax Exempt Insured Series 1989A)
I S.D #278 Orono 04/24/89 G.O. School Building Bonds 2,735M 1992-2010 7.21% 7.44% Al
St. Peter 04/24/89 G.O. Hospital-Nursing Home 1,200M 1990-2004 7.20% 7 44% Baal
Refunding Bonds
Young America 04/25/89 G.O. Temporary Improvement Bonds 1,230M 1992 6 89% 7.44% NR
Minnesota Higher Ed. 04/26/89 Revenue Bonds 4,415M 1990-2014 7 33% 7.44% BIG
Facilities Authority (College of St. Thomas)
Inver Grove Heights 05/01/89 G.O. Improvement Bonds 1,650M 1992-2007 7 04% 7 40% A
Inver Grove Heights 05/01/89 G.O. Water Revenue Bonds 3,475M 1991-2005 7 04% 7 40% A
Lake County 05/01/89 G.O. Capital Improvement Bonds 1,000M 1990-2009 7.32% 7.40% Baal
Shoreview 05/01/89 G.O. Park Bonds 2,235M 1994-2003 6.95% 7 40% Al
Anoka County 05/08/89 G.O. Capital Improvement Bonds 12,675M 1990-2009 7.15% 7 36% Al
Mankato 05/08/89 G.O. Bonds 3,260M 1991-2000 6.87% 7.36% Al
Winnebago 05/08/89 G.0 Grant & Loan Antic. Certs. 1,040M 1989 8.00% 7.36% NR
Hutchinson 05/09/89 Nursing Home Revenue Bonds 830M 1991-2004 7.90% 7.36% NR
Minneapolis 05/09/89 G 0. Bonds 29,510M 1990-2009 6 98% 7 36% Aaa/AAA
Minneapolis/St; Paul Area 05/09/89 G.O. Sewer Bonds 16,300M 1991-2007 6 97% 7 16% Aaa/AAA
Metropolitan Council
Woodbury 05/10/89 G.O. Water Revenue Bonds 475M 1990-2004 7.08% 7.36% A
Woodbury 05/10/89 G.O. Improvement Bonds 4,525M 1991-2000 6.86% 7.36% A
Bond
Net Buyer
Municipality Date Type of Bonds Amount Maturity Rate Index Rating
Minnesota Cont.
Suburban Hennepin Reg. 05/18/89 G.O. Bonds $ 3,800M 1991-2004 6.75% 7.36% Aal
Park District
Grand Marais 05/22/89 G.O. Bonds 700M 1991-2000 6.83% 7.18% Baa
Warroad Port Authority 05/22/89 Tax Increment Housing Rev. Bonds 900M 1994 7.49% 7.18% NR
Dodge County 05/23/89 Certificates of Participation 2,825M 1990-2010 7.14% 7.18% Baa
Minnesota Higher Educ. 05/24/89 Revenue Bonds:-Series Two-T 5,105M 1990-2014 7.22% 7.18% Baa
Facilities Authority (College of St. Scholastica)
Morgan 05/30/89 G.O. Water Revenue Bonds 335M 1991-2008 7.12% 7.11% NR
Perham 05/30/89 G.O. Grant Anticipation Bonds 1,500M 1991 6.76% 7.11% NR
Verndale 05/30/89 G.O. Grant & Loan Antic. Bonds 530M 1991 6.77% 7.11% NR
Wisconsin
Maple Dale- 04/10/89 G.O. School Bonds 2,600M 2000-2009 7.34% 7.56% Aa
Indian Hill S/D
Milton 04/18/89 Sewer System Mortgage Rev. Bonds 355M 1990-2004 7.69% 7.54% NR
Neenah 04/19/89 G.O. Promissory Notes 1,425M 1990-1999 6.96% 7.54% Aa
Milwaukee 04/18/89 G.O. Airport Bonds 29,325M 1991-2008 7.47% 7.54% Aa/AA-
Oshkosh 04/20/89 G.O. Promissory Notes 805M 1990-1999 7.10% 7.54% Al
Oshkosh 04/20/89 Taxable Corporate Purpose Bonds 1,000M 1995-2008 10.15% 7.54% Al
Milwaukee Metropolitan 04/24/89 G.O. Capital Corp. Purpose Bonds 50,000M 1997-2001 7.09% 7.40% Aa/AA
Sewerage District
Muskego 04/25/89 G.O. Promissory Notes 775M 1991-1999 6.98% 7.44% A
Hartland-Lakeside 04/26/89 G.O. Improvement Bonds 2,520M 1991-2004 7.15%. 7.44% A
Joint S/D #3
Madison Area VTAE 04/26/89 G.O. Promissory Notes 4,500M 1990-1993 6.81% 7.44% Aal/AAA
Green Bay 05/02/89 G.O. Corporate Purpose Bonds 3,110M 1990-2008 7.10% 7.40% Aa/AA
State of Wisconsin 05/03/89 G.O. Bonds 71,415M 1990-2009 7.13% 7.40% Aa/AA
Ashland 05/09/89 G.O. Promissory Notes 1,045M 1992 6.96% 7.36% NR
Outagamie County 05/09/89 G.O. Airport Bonds 1,575M 1990-2008 7 35% 7.36% Aal
Outagamie County 05/09/89 Taxable G.O. Airport Bonds 1,600M 1990-2008 10.04% 7.36% Aal
Tomah 05/09/89 Water System Mortgage Rev. Bonds 735M 1990-2004 7.39% 7.36% NR
Wausau 05/09/89 Sewerage System Revenue Bonds 6,900M 1992-2011 7.28% 7.36% AMBAC
Waukesha County 05/11/89 G.O. Promissory Notes 9,940M 1989-1998 6.76% 7 36% Aaa
Monona 05/15/89 G.O. Promissory Notes 1,045M 1990-1997 6.80% 7.36% Al
Madison 05/16/89 G.O. Promissory Notes 8,000M 1990-1999 6.76% 7.36% Aaa
Milwaukee 05/16/89 G.0 Corporate Purpose Public 22,220M 1990-2004 6.90% 7.36% Aa/AA+
Improvement Bonds
Milwaukee 05/16/89 Short Term Promissory Notes 32,500M 1990 6.72% 7 36%
Waukesha 05/16/89 G.O. Community Development Bonds 900M 1993-2004 6.84% 7.36% Aa
Waukesha 05/16/89 G.0 Promissory Notes 3,770M 1991-1996 6.66% 7.36% Aa
Oshkosh 05/18/89 G.O. Corporate Purpose Bonds 2,635M 1990-2004 6.89% 7.36% Al
Milwaukee Area VTAE 05/22/89 G.O. Promissory Notes 500M 1990-1993 6.59% 7.18% Aa/AA
Verona 05/22/89 G.O. Corporate Purpose Bonds 1,050M 1991-2005 6.82% 7.18% A
Marshfield 05/23/89 Electric System Revenue Bonds 2,400M 1991-2009 6.88% 7.18% Aa
Sparta Area S/D 05/23/89 G.O. School Building Bonds 3,850M 1991-2009 7.01% 7.18% A
Blair 05/30/89 G.O. Promissory Notes 225M 1990-1998 6.94% 7.11% NR
North Dakota
State Board of Higher Ed. 04/04/89 Student Center Revenue Bonds 900M 1990-2009 7.68% 7.64% NR
(Mayville State Univ.)
North Dakota State 04/25/89 Facilities Improvement Rev Bonds 350M 1990-1997 7.19% 7.44% NR
Board of Higher Ed.
Minot S/D Building Auth. 05/01/89 First Mortgage Revenue Bonds 1,025M 1990-2001 6.99% 7.40% A
Minto 05/01/89 G.O. Refunding Improvement Bonds 540M 1990-2004 7.23% 7.40% NR
CITY OF
cliANBAssE_N
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jo Ann Olsen, Senior Planner
FROM: Don Ashworth, City Manager
DATE: July 5, 1989
SUBJ: Variances
I note by the cc that you received a copy of Roger Knutson ' s
description of findings which must be made by Council to grant a
variance. As discussed at our staff meeting, this request was to
provide applicants with a better understanding of the process and
the likelihood that the Council would approve their request.
Please make sure that Roger' s opinion is placed with the variance
application materials.
Per our discussion at the last staff meeting, I would still like
to pursue A Citizen's Guide to Understanding Variances. I was sure that
I had brought back a booklet having a similar title from a con-
ference several years ago. I do not, find it in my files and we
agreed that we would both- try to keep our eyes open in future
publication listings for this type of document.
Please note that I am copying the City Council so as to make them
aware of our previous discussion and Roger' s follow through.
cc: City Council
O
•
I.AU' Oi ru is
(JUANNIS, (,I(ANNIS, FA1!(1•II KNU!SON
DAVt"L. GHANNI5 - 1811-196I PHUI 1SSHINAI As i,&IAIIUN I111Ui1'IP H.
I)1VII) L. GHANNI5,JR. — 1910-11180 Pi.' Om(I' Bux 57 (612)155-2.359
VAN(E B GRANNIS
103 NUHN'1.51 BANK BIM DINT, I:I I ttllT II KNIT'S(II
VAN(E B GHANNI5,JR.* I(e1 Ne atilt (.uN(()Rt, I:St ItANII �tlt IIADI I �IA\I-K
L� 1 11.1(11111 IliKi,
PATRICK A. FAHRIIt. J
DAVID L. GHANNI5, lfI S11u m Sr S PAUL, MINNESOTA 55075
I((x,IR N KNDTSUN IIIIPIIUNI ((1121 155-I(6I
DAVID L. IIAHMI:YER
•Aix)Aim ma,q'u
PAAL iI(l IN Wlx liN]IN June 29, 1989
CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL
Donald J. Chmiel, Mayor
Tout Workman, Councilman
Ursula Dimler, Councilwoman
Jay Johnson, Councilman
Bill Boyt, Councilman
RE: Variances
Dear Mayor and Councilmembers:
At the last City Council meeting you asked me what type of
"hardship" qualifies someone for a variance. Minn. Stat. §
462 .357 , subd. 6 defines "hardship" as follows:
"Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting of
a variance means the property in question cannot be put to a
reasonable use under conditions allowed by the official
controls, the plight of the landowner is due to
circumstances unique to the property not created by the
landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the
essential character of the locality. Economic considerations
alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable
use for the property exists under the terms of the
ordinance. Undue hardship also includes, but is not limited
to, inadequate access to direct 'sunlight for solar energy
systems.
Under the statutory definition a three part analysis must be
made to determine if a hardship exists:
( 1 ) Without the variance is it possible to make reasonable
use of the property? Expansion of an existing house rarely
qualifies for a variance because the existing home generally
provides reasonable use of the property. A lot substandard in
size without any buildings on it would generally qualify for a
variance because without the variance the lot could not be put to
a reasonable use.
J U L 31989
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
Chanhassen City Council
June 29 , 1989
Page Two
(2 ) Is the need for the variance the result of a self-
created hardship? For example,—assuming in 1985 the minimum lot
size is 10, 000 square feet and a property owner owns two abutting
lots, each of which is 10 , 000 square feet. Then, assuming in 1986
the City increased the minimum lot size to 15, 000 square feet. In
1987 the landowner sells one of the two lots and then requests a
building permit for the lot he still owns. He would need a
variance because the lot is now substandard in size. The property
owner, however, would not be entitled to a variance because he
could have combined the two lots and would not have needed a
variance. The hardship is self-created because he could have
prevented the need for it.
( 3 ) Will the proposed construction fit the character of the
neighborhood?
I have tried to keep my explanation brief. If you want any
additional information, please call.
e.r --tzrours,
GRANNIS; GRANNIS, FARRELL
L KNUTSON, P.A.-- --
JIBY-
/ Royer N. Knutson
RNK: srn
cc: Don Ashworth
Jo Ann Olsen