Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
1j. Feasibility Study for Utility and Roadway Improvements Frontier
CITYOF .20 C HANHASSEN • 690 COULTER DRIVE • P O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 MEMORANDUM TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager _ (�-t ' _.�. York ' FROM: Gary Warren, City Engineer r T� DATE: April 5 , 1989 SUBJ: Authorize Feasibility Study for Utility and Roadway Improvements to Frontier Trail from Highland Drive to Kiowa Project No. 89-10 When Frontier Trail was first constructed around 1967 , little did ' people know that to travel on this roadway in the 1980s would be as challenging as its name implies. The roadway has been repaired and patched and sealcoated over the years; however, it has diminished to such a state that continued maintenance of this ' nature is truly a waste of money since these are only band-aid solutions and a major operation is needed for the cure. ' In 1988 , the City contracted for a "Road Rater" deflection testing of the pavement surface to determine if complete replace- ment of the roadway section and reconstruction of the sub-base ' would be necessary or if instead some sort of remedial overlay could be conducted on this roadway section. The results of the Road Rater analysis had confirmed that the sub base of the road- way has deteriorated to such an extent that complete reconstruc- tion is in order for a majority of the roadway. In addition , the storm drainage system in this area needs to be ' upgraded as well as some isolated sanitary sewer and watermain repairs which would be prudent to undertake as long as the road- way surface is being replaced. The City televised the sanitary sewer in this area in 1987 to locate these areas of rehabilita- tion . This would also be the time where we would notify the respective private utilities such as gas , telephone, cable and electric to give them an opportunity to make any necessary impro- vements to their systems and in the case of electric, to consider undergrounding of this utility similar with new subdivisions in the City. This project will be unique in that it is the first residential roadway in the City to be considered for reconstruction . This feasibility study will therefore blaze the trail in helping us to t II Don Ashworth April 5 , 1989 Page 2 establish policy as far as the funding of improvements of this nature , including any appropriate assessment policies. It has been common practice in other communities where pavement manage- ment systems are in place and street reconstruction is an annual event, to assess a portion of the reconstruction and upgrade costs to abutting property owners . The policies vary from com- munity to community but in general terms , if a roadway is being widened or curb and gutter is added when it was not in place before, the abutting residents are normally looked at to pay for the cost for the new elements of the roadway and the costs for restoring the existing portions of the roadway and utilities is borne by the community. This needs to be looked at in full detail as a part of the feasibility study and will be appropriately addressed since the cost estimates for the rehabi- litation will also be presented in the report. The City has a number of older streets in town which are can- didates for improvement and once we have established a program, the next likely candidate after Frontier Trail would be the Chan Estates area, i .e. Cheyenne road and the old town area ( see attached letter to Elinor Kerber) . It is therefore my recommen- dation that the City Council authorize the preparation of a feasibility study for utility and roadway improvements for Frontier Trail from Highland Drive to Kiowa and that it prepared by the firm of William R. Engelhardt & Associates. Attachments 1 . Location map. , 2 . Letter from A. L. Brock dated April 7 , 1988. 3 . Road Rater sheets. 4 . Letter to Elinor Kerber dated April 3 , 1989 . cc: Bill Engelhardt A. L. Brock ' Manager ' s Comment: It should be noted: 1 . Sealcoat Program: When the sealcoat program was initiated in the early 1980 ' s, it was noted that a majority of the City' s streets were in good condition and, through such a main- tenance program, we could reasonably assure that the lives of these streets could be maintained well into the future. The lower portion of Frontier Trail, Chanhassen Estates, and ' potentially Scholer ' s Addition (West 76th/Chan View/Iroquois) were specifically identified as streets not meeting City standards . By contrast, once these areas were brought up to City standards , the City would insure that the life was main- tained in those streets through continuous maintenance. It � A ' Manager ' s Comment Page 2 tis difficult to assess property owners for street costs ; however, Carver Beach, Greenwood Shores, old town section, ' West 79th Street, downtown, business park, Pleasant View, are all areas where new streets were installed either separately or in combination with utility work and the costs assessed back to property owners. All new streets, as a part of our ' Subdivision Ordinance, are required to meet current standards - curb and gutter/full depth. These owners have also paid for those streets via purchasing their lots . It was and is ' staff' s belief that it is not reasonable to have maintenance dollars pay for roadways which have been brought up to reasonable standards. ' Memorandums as considered by the City Council in establishing the seal maintenance program are proposed to be included with the feasibility study. 1 wA 1 1 `- -1 Solt=mmia,,.. '.•t1��1�' \\� 1 \ '' F02 TAIL ` i\\ '� COURT pp vii ,. ■ *Wi-InIMwLt."^kA: fit:• / J \,.\. ,4,10___'.,,:-:- ..7 t•Cv W i 7 d%7k\P------1 a-_-_I_:- 41i1 :/ti AV., iIIA 11 ` , . \mil �•.\ `t 1 1 4Ur net; It V air ?. .,01 pa. ', LOTUS ��-Arti r E ��'�.°i -- 104 0� w 14 MN � •: . 'rte �� ve Ilk mr-i — El Eildia- ;:a. itv s,U1A L• 1 lip- `i w X14*Pas �,� 1li,r a'` , i� *tit s"��ill\�� � � 1 SVC..■;* ''4 1010111404 4! '' ' W 1 ll��ulNll/�� ".441N; ����%406' IM 1A A �' ***� L A K E o 1,∎ *1 vr� to bill tea`�■ ■■O # ` _ ��.� ` ,ems tow _- .. ,,�i■ err it 1i - o as �� n; Nit di■ .a+► t� ,11 W'‘.*ea rip ip9mrifirensoqiitum. 104 0 ,`, �� .4►si•.. 47, a D %i 4 NI nI a ..A% . _o l C • `� is IN`=' OEN Mw w 'I 'J31mi■ ��� :: :P _il ;g 11111111111111111 •MS MVO vk 4 -,-_,-,--_-_,, >� C9U E � I tl� ■ 11111 i���tr� W p , . . :i :;:' NM 1 opt � F� :,, -- _ � ��%I) �j�MVO*' a a' ` LI ii er PP�� PP sac• A' pACIF — STATE r'ix.HIGHWAY o ��,� ti ��' �% ~�' _ otche_ rap,la ...—... __ . 11:11;1116fIlriAtIliP,L ! . } ' April 7, 195 Mr. Gary Warren City of Chanhassen ' b90 Coulter Drive Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Dear Gary: This is to follow-up on our conversation at City Hall on March 29, 1988. ' As discussed , I am greatly concerned with two problem areas. First, the curbing and run-off drain to Lotus Lake, which is located on the north side of my home. As stated, last summer the swale area was blocked by debris, and ' during the July storm turned into a raging river which came within five feet of my none. As a direct result, over $8,000 of property damage occurred, none of which was insured. I called City Hall on four occasions and was told the curbing on the east side of Frontier Trail leading to the drain would be repaired. Also, that the drain would be kept clean at all times. Instead, a crew repaired the west ' curb and I have personally cleared the drain area twice. This is a potentially dangerous situation, not only due to flooding again, but also the embankment above the drain was weakened and the ground could give way at any time. Your ' immediate attention to the curbing and drain area will be greatly appreciated. The second area of concern is the 7100, 7200 and 7300 section of Frontier Trail. The road is literally destroyed and needs to be repaired. Last week, a child ' was almost run over as a car hit one of the huge potholes and momentarily lost control. This section of Frontier Trail has been in dire need of attention for the past few years, and should be given attention before a serious accident ' occurs. Also, perhaps by repairing this section of Frontier Trail, a good portion of the drain problem will be reduced. Pieces of asphalt are constantly washed down from the 7300 block and clog the drain. ' If there is anything I can do as a property owner who pays over $5,000/year in property tax, to edpedite these matters, please contact me. ' I thank you in advance for your concern and attention. Sincerely, ���� -.•- A.L. Brock ' 7203 Frontier Trail 'C� S� Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 ( �'\: 934-9539 ' ALB:jm cc: Mayor Tom Hamilton Chanhassen City Council S .. i t P , . yt it& • 1e II pohc, Ate„` 01/4"04 P4"` i 1 ! a-VIA — r n exoansron of 4 l I l 'j,url!tv ,,,nrn•t ern!^ 1`n"7,MIDWEST PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT, INC. _ MN 55104—612 / 644-2996 I PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES 04 Concordia Avenue St Paul N 55 I - f September 21, 1988 r i CITY OF CHANHASSEN li Mr. Gary Warren II 690 Coulter Drive PO Box 147 i 1 Chanhassen, MN 55317 I • II Dear Mr. Warren; r Enclosed please find a copy of our report entitled II PAVEMENT STRENGTH EVALUATION FOR II CITY OF CHANHASSEN We sincerely appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you 1 and to the City of Chanhassen. Should there be any questions II regarding the contents of the report or any of our other services, please do not hesitate to call. I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me under my II direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. I 1 t/c .--67490 .9c24,1.4.4.,.0.A... David W. Janisch, P.E. I Registration Number: 18562 1 Date: c ;_ve_e_ 1 I I I I II a II 11 II I . I I/ INTRODUCTION The City of Chanhassen contacted Braun Pavement Technologies to I conduct deflection testing on approximately 5 miles of city streets. The deflection testing was done on August 1-2 , 1988 . The testing was done with a Model 2000 Road Rater at 100 foot I intervals in both directions. The spacing was staggered in either direction so that a net spacing of 50 feet was achieved for each section of roadway. The purpose of this report is to make recommendations for pavement rehabilitation based on effective subgrade R-value, Effective Granular Equivalency, overlay thickness, and spring axle load restriction in tons per axle. This report makes reference to 2331, 2341 and Class 5. These refer to the Minnesota Department of Transportation standard specifications I for highway construction for plant mixed bituminous pavement, plant mixed bituminous surface, and aggregates for surface and base courses respectively. I I I I i I 11 I 11 I 11 I T . II FRONTIER TRAIL FROM 177 FEET WEST OF KIOWA CIRCLE II TO HIGHLAND DRIVE ANALYSIS I This section is 3188 feet long and consists of 2 .5 inches of asphalt surface. It was originally assumed that this section I consisted of 2. 0 inches of 2341 wearing course over 4 . 0 inches of 2331 binder. However, after analyzing the data, it was apparent that either the traffic reported was too low, or the in-place II thickness was not as high as originally reported. Braun Engineering Testing took 3 cores at locations indicated on the attached sheet on Frontier Trail. These cores indicate an II asphalt surface ranging from a minimum of 2-3/8 inches to a maximum of 2-3/4 inches. The data was re-evaluated using 2 .5 inches of asphalt. The traffic is assumed to be a minimum of 3 . 0 } daily ESALs. The surface condition rating is 2.3 with medium to II high severity alligator cracking located. at nearly every test point. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS I Area 1: 177 feet west of Kiowa Circle to Laredo Drive II R-value = 9 EGE = 8 . 0 inches Overlay = 2 .5 inches (9-ton) 1.5 inches (7-ton) 1 I Area 2 : Laredo Drive to Highland Drive R-value = 10 II EGE = 9 . 5 inches Overlay = 2 . 0 inches (9-ton) 1. 0 inches (7-ton) 1 3 II Tonnage = 7 tons per axle 1 DISCUSSION II ._ There is one area of extremely low subgrade soil strength in Area 1 located at location 349 where the effective R-value is only 4. IIf this roadway is ever reconstructed, it is recommended that the II soil be corrected at that location. 1Due to the large amount of high severity load related distress 1 (alligator cracking) , it is recommended that this section be II reconstructed. The large amount of load related distress indicates that this roadway was subject to axle loads in excess I of the 7-ton recommendation. Repeated applications of axle loads II in excess of a pavement's allowable limit will result in shortened pavement life due to accelerated fatigue. The recommended reconstruction section for this roadway is as follows: I 9-ton Design 7-ton Design f 1.5 inches 2341 wearing course 2 . 0 inches 2341 wearing course II 1.5 inches 2331 binder 5. 0 inches Class 5 Aggregate Base 5. 0 inches Class 5 Aggregate Base 1 FROM BRAUN ENS. E. P. MN (WED )©9. 2 . 8 14: 39 N0. 1E 'PAGE 2 111 . 'REPORT OF FIELD It- Li, 2,4 On- sd"„w BITUMINOUS TESTS I ENGINEERING TESTING 816cetvsl Tested for. LP I C k6--1\1 S �r.l ui Project #: 8P r- # $&'--`}s(,--, / Date: 9��w,;( 1��j ITest No. { tt Probe Depth ,' Density Count Wet Density Gauge Serial No: Ili Sub-base Density~ Density Standard: Sub-base/Bitum. r Response Moisture Standard: I Nuclear Method ASTM: 02922-81 Marshall Density ASTM: D1559 . Core Method ASTM• R?726 MAY Then flimsily ASTM: D20/11 Layoown Max Lab In Place T4'$I MN'Pil TI)irtma Temn Ren.lity Alt frnvty Prrrrnt Snenhorf No. Oate Spcc.r+ Cojrse (in.) (°F) (PCF) (PCF) Compaction Compaction Comments a 3 N . 3 1 2.3`/x" I . ______ I , , . i ____ _ _ . . 1 ._._.___.__. ,___ ______ i . - ......_ Test N0. TEST LOCATION II 1 Lane ��__. ..._._.,5 ' oc5 of G1)2R Z G `721 0 i IL — .,_.6R5 i, 0P Cu,e$J 500n1 Nit-J-45 0 198 I Aci\tT1E- i p....4-IL . 4 I1. Bituminous A. Test Results Comply With Compaction Specifications. II. 6. Tact Roculto Do Not Comply With Cpceifieatialls. 3. IField Representative on BRAUN PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. - COMMISSION NO: 88-426 1 DATE OF TEST (M/D/Y): 3/2/89 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FRONTIER TRAIL DAILY ESAL's: 3.0 I TEMPERATURE RANGE (deg.F): 84-84 from: 177 ' WEST OF KIOWA C I R C L E ASPHALT THICKNESS (inches): 6.0 to: HIGHLAND DRIVE SURFACE CONDITION RATING: 2.3 I SEASONAL CORRECTION FACTOR: 1.64 COMMENTS: IR) AND (L) REFERENCE THE TEST POINT LOCATION TO THE CENTERLINE / MODIFIED SEASONAL CORRECTION FACTOR. TEST --SENSOR READINGS (MILS)-- EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE AXLE LOAD II LOCATION FORCE FRED DEFL DEFL DEFL DEFL SUBGRADE G.E. RESTRICTION (FEET) (KIPS) (HZ) 11 12 #3 #4 R-VALUE (INCHES) (TONS/AXLE) COMMENTS I 0 R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- --- ---- 177FT W OF KIONA CR 48 L 3.04 15.0 10.75 7.68 4.30 1.30 9 11.8 8.1 L-TRANS.CR II I 101 R 2.97 15.0 7.78 7.28 2.98 1.54 10 18.1 10.5 M-ALLIG.CR/PATCH 149 L 3.04 15.0 6.73 5.22 1.52 1.25 16 15.3 10.2 M-TRANS.CR 177 R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- --- ---- C/L KIOYA CR 201 R 3.00 15.0 6.69 4.28 2.03 1.75 17 14.2 9.9 L-TRANS.CR II • 246 L 2.99 15.0 7.00 6.52 2.86 1.92 10 20.3 11.4 PATCH 301 R 3.04 15.0 7.41 5.22 2.71 1.99 13 16.0 10.1 M-ALLIG.CR 349 L 2.54 15.2 13.67 12.23 6.57 1.68 4 10.7 6.8 PATCH I 400 R 2.97 15.0 8.26 7.26 2.63 1.97 10 16.7 9.9 M-ALLIG.CR 446 L 2.97 15.1 5.78 3.92 1.67 1.28 19 15.6 10.6 M-ALLIG.CR 501 R 3.07 15.0 7.32 4.72 2.22 1.31 16 13.4 9.5 M-ALLIG.CR II 550 L 2.96 15.0 4.40 3.00 1.51 1.21 24 19.0 12.4 PATCH 600 R 3.07 15.0 8.80 8.75 2.49 1.67 8 17.8 10.1 M-ALLIG.CR 648 L 3.15 15.0 3.79 2.89 ' 1.63 1.50 23 25.6 15.6 M-ALLIG.CR 702 R 2.99 15.0 12.39 12.18 1.67 1.28 7 11.7 7.7 L-TRANS.CR I 747 L 3.05 15.1 8.70 6.08 1.97 1.10 13 11.7 8.7 PATCH 821 R 3.12 15.0 9.83 5.64 2.44 1.87 13 8.7 7.8 M-ALLIG.CR 844 L 3.01 15.0 9.46 6.12 2.03 1.38 12 9.9 8.0 PATCH I901 R 3.01 15.0 12.77 8.53 2.37 1.16 9 7.4 6.9 M-ALLIG.CR 949 L 3.03 15.1 9.33 6.44 1.91 1.10 12 10.7 8.2 M-ALLIG.CR 1001 R 3.05 15.1 7.24 4.12 1.88 1.24 18 11.0 8.9 L-ALLIG.CR i 1049 L 3.03 15.1 8.31 4.99 1.75 1.43 15 9.9 8.3 M-ALLIG.CR I 1- 1103 R 3.14 15.1 9.88 4.35 1.77 1.15 16 5.9 7.2 H-ALLIG.CR 1149 L 3.07 15.1 6.71 6.11 2.42 1.37 12 19.1 11.3 M-ALLIG.CR 1200 R 3.06 15.1 7.89 4.74 1.96 1.21 16 11.0 8.7 H-ALLIG.CR I 4 1250 L 3.11 15.1 8.60 6.13 2.35 1.28 13 12.9 9.0 H-ALLIG.CR 1301 R 3.04 15.0 8.24 6.78 2.07 1.94 11 15.2 9.6 L-ALLIG.CR/PATCH 1348 L 3.08 15.0 10.96 6.09 2.22 1.48 12 6.8 7.2 H-ALLIG.CR II i 1402 R 2.99 15.0 9.88 6.01 2.08 1.50 12 8.7 7.7 M-TRANS.CR 1434 L 3.06 15.0 9.18 5.22 1.72 1.27 15 8.3 7.8 PATCH 1503 R 2.96 15.0 7.69 5.06 2.01 1.28 14 12.3 9.0 M-ALLIG.CR 1 1542 L 3.00 15.0 7.10 5.07 1.90 1.41 15 14.4 9.8 M-ALLIG.CR/PATCH I i_ 1602 R 2.99 15.0 6.81 5.47 1.82 1.40 14 16.2 10.4 L-ALLIG.CR 1646 L 3.04 15.0 8.94 8.87 2.15 1.62 9 17.0 9.8 PATCH i 1712 R 3.00 15.0 6.19 4.05 1.79 1.24 19 14.6 10.2 M-ALLIG.CR I 1749 L 3.04 15.0 11.89 8.39 2.18 1.26 9 8.6 7.3 H-ALLIG.CR 1800 R 3.06 15.0 6.69 4.01 1.70 1.24 20 12.3 9.4 M-ALLIG.CR 1850 L 2.96 15.0 4.92 3.89 2.28 1.72 15 23.2 13.6 PATCH f 1902 R 3.01 15.0 7.31 4.78 2.00 1.18 16 12.9 9.3 M-ALLIG.CR I 1947 L 3.01 15.0 7.52 4.94 2.03 1.27 15 12.8 9.2 L-TRANS.CR 2005 R 3.03 15.0 7.07 4.16 1.96 1.68 18 11.8 9.1 L-BLOCK CR 2048 L 3.09 15.1 6.10 4.61 2.28 1.62 15 18.6 11.5 M-ALLIG.CR I 2101 R 2.92 15.0 7.33 5.20 2.54 1.84 13 13.5 9.2 2149 L 2.99 15.0 8.40 6.15 2.27 1.46 12 13.2 9.0 M-ALLIG.CR I t 111 )RAUN PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. - COMMISSION NO: 88-426 (CONTINUED) DATE OF TEST (M/D/Y): 8/2/88 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FRONTIER TRAIL DAILY ESAL's: 3.0 II 'EMPERATURE RANGE (deq.F): 84-84 from: 177 ' WEST OF K I O W A CIRCLE ASPHALT THICKNESS (inches): 6.0 to: HIGHLAND DRIVE ;URFA CONDITION RATING: 2.3 ICE iEASONAL CORRECTION FACTOR: 1.64 COMMENTS: (P.) AND (L) REFERENCE THE TEST POINT LOCATION TO THE CENTERLINE / MODIFIED SEASONAL CORRECTION FACTOR. ITEST --SENSOR READINGS (MILS)-- EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE AXLE LOAD LOCATION FORCE FRED DEFL DEFL DEFL DEFL SUBGRADE G.E. RESTRICTION III (FEET) (KIPS) (Hi) 11 12 #3 14 R-VALUE (INCHES) (TONS/AXLE) COMMENTS 2201 R 3.01 15.0 7.09 5.07 2.36 1.43 14 15.3 10.0 H-ALLIG.CR 2247 L 2.99 15.0 7.21 5.25 2.48 1.79 13 16.0 10.1 M-ALLIG.CR III 2290 R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- --- ---- CIL LAREDO DR 2317 R 3.O2 15.0 9.79 7.24 2.82 1.97 10 12.6 8.5 PATCH 2350 L 3.07 15.0 8.80 6.11 2.79 1.94 11 13.3 9.0 L-ALLIG.CR I 2401 R 3.00 15.0 8.62 6.35 2.55 1.71 11 13.6 9.1 H-ALLIG.CR 2449 L 3.O6 15.0 10.42 6.61 2.64 1.82 11 9.6 7.8 M-ALLIG.CR 2501 R 3.07 14.9 9.00 5.58 2.34 1.72 13 10.6 8.S M-ALLIG.CR/PATCH I 2548 L 3.02 15.0 5.84 4.65 2.29 1.86 14 20.5 12.1 PATCH 2600 R 3.06 15.0 5.88 5.16 1.85 1.30 15 19.4 11.8 PATCH 2644 L 3.11 14.7 7.32 4.51 2.43 1.79 16 13.5 9.5 L-TRANS.CR/PATCH 2703 R 3.02 15.0 9.54 8.63 2.98 1.70 9 15.2 9.2 M-TRANS.CR I 2747 L 3.02 15.1 9.33 6.92 3.00 2.27 10 13.8 8.9 L-ALLIG.CR 2810 R 3.07 I5.0 7.97 5.21 2.66 2.06 13 13.8 9.4 M-ALLIG.CR 2846 L 3.08 15.1 7.87 6.48 2.42 1.77 11 16.3 10.1 L-ALLIG.CR I 2900 R 2.96 15.0 7.92 6.12 2.57 2.03 11 15.7 L-TRANS.CR 2950 L 3.02 15.0 9.66 6.02 2.41 1.75 12 9.8 8.0 L-ALLIG.CR 3001 R 3.03 15.0 8.47 5.42 2.59 2.15 13 12.4 8.9 PATCH I 3049 L 3.04 15.0 10.48 8.92 2.93 2.53 14.0 -8�1 H-ALLIG.CR 3101 R 3.03 15.0 9.53 5.48 3.36 2.32 12 10.3 8.1 L-ALLIG.CR 3142 R PVMT CHG 3150 L 3.06 15.0 7.74 6.02 2.82 1.94 11 16.7 10.2 3188 R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- --- ---- CJL HIGHLAND DR II- I Il- I It II- It a BRAUN PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. - COMMISSION NO: 88-426 . I DATE OF TEST (M/D/Y): 8/2/88 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FRONTIER TRAIL -DAILY ESAL's: 3.0 I TEMPERATURE RANGE (deg.F): 84-84 from: 177 ' WEST OF KIOWA C I R C L E ASPHALT THICKNESS (inches): 6.0 to: HIGHLAND DRIVE SURFACE CONDITION RATING: 2.3 I SEASONAL CORRECTION FACTOR: 1.64 COMMENTS: (R) AND (L) REFERENCE THE TEST POINT LOCATION TO THE CENTERLINE / MODIFIED SEASONAL CORRECTION FACTOR. EFFECTIVE SUPGRADE R-VALUE I 0 i 10 20 70 40 50 60 70 BO 90 100 )c_) L 1. 0 _) , , , , I , , , , I , , , , I , 2 1 , ) , , r , 1 , , 1 , 1 , , , , I , , i , I , , , , I , , , I I 177FT W OF )•.IOWA CFi 48 ----� L-TRANS. CR 101 ---pa--- M-ALLIG5G, CR/PATCH 14w = 17 RN I RCR 146 - ....-- PATCH 301 - --' w -° - M-ALLIG. CR - PATCH 400 -may M-ALLIG. C6 - M-ALLIG. 0 B I-n 1 - M-ALLIG. CFA 550 - ._ ..... . ._ PATCH 600 -......—. M-ALLIG. CR 648 - .----..■ M-A L.L I G. CR 7t 2 --°--- L-TRANS. CR 747 -...W,w------- PATCH §?4 =,-.-m. 3AtitukIG. CR 901 -- M-ALLIG. CR 949 ------- M-A L.L_I G. C R 1()01 - L-ALLIG. CR 1649 M-ALLIG. CF: 114 H-ALLIG. CR 9 - r'1-ALLIG. CR 1200) - ---■ H-ALLIG. CR 1250 - H-ALLIG. CF: I 1701 - L-ALLIG. CR/PATCH 1:7;48 --- H-ALLIG. CR ii.y - pATE NS. CR 15(17 �_ LL�LLIICc I 116E542 - Mil-ALLIG:CR/PATCH 111Z644O - - �F1'A`('ILC`H_IICG. CR : 17?f9 - --- H- ER-�LCI[: I II 1800 - M-ALLIG. CR ?- 1856 - - - PATCH 194 _ M-ALLIG. CR 'TF<AI�IS» CR 4 '2)i)° h:NEHFLER _ 2101 - ..... = 2149 -------- M-ALLIG. CR }r 0 ------a-� H_-ALLTI�G.CCR 3 y(F.� -� � tL�={AF:LD� DR I �,t> - L-AC`I G.. CR 2401 - --s H-ALLIG. CR 2449 M•-ALLIG. CR 2501 --"'---� M-ALL IG. CR/PATCH I '7,548 -'----��--- F'A f C H ' 1 ' 4 - PATCH 77c� L_-TRANS. CR/PATCH x`747 ------ ft- Et.IE:FF: 2900 ...... L-TRANS. CR 2 - --)i 1 -.....,,.- L-ALL.IG. CR Y�149 _ HATCH II --.-..—...,. V M TL C R b/_ HroNLAND DR . - 1 50H0 -I , r , l i n t ( -F R 7� ( r r r , I r , r , I , , r , I TT I I , , , , I r , r , I r , , r I a 10 20 70 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 II r I )KAHN PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. - COMMISSION NO: 88-426 DATE OF TEST (M/D/Y): 9/2/88 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FRONTIER TRAIL I )AILY ESAL's: 3.0 'EMPERATURE RANGE (deg.F): 84-94 from: 1 7 7 ' WEST OF K IOWA C I R C L E ASPHALT THICKNESS (inches): 6.0 to: HIGHLAND DRIVE IURFACE■ CONDITION RATING: 2.3 EASDNAL CORRECTION FACTOR: 1.64 COMMENTS: (R) AND (L) REFERENCE THE TEST POINT LOCATION TO THE CENTERLINE / MODIFIED SEASONAL CORRECTION FACTOR. IEFFECTIVE PAVEMENT GRANULAR THICKNESS (inches) 0 J 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 I r-) _I-u-___ I , , , , I , , , , I , , , , I , , , , I , , , , 1 , , , , i , , , , l , , , , i „ I I 177FT W OF FK::IO4WJA CR 48 -^� L-TRANS. CR i _ . .. .__ .. .. M-A�.L . R/PATCH 4b -• • F'A1FRAN bJ Rm II - . 01 M-ALLIG. CR _.. PATCH 4O( M-ALLIG. CR 446 M-ALLIG. CR I 501 M-ALLIG. CR PATCH 6C)g - M-ALLIG. CR 648 M-ALLIG. CR II 702 - - L-TRANS. CR 747 _ _.. _ . _ . . PATCH X344 _= ......�._ pAAtbiIG. CR 9')1 —= — — -- M-ALLIG. CR 99 - M-ALLIG. CR I1(;)x4) 1 -� L-ALLIG. CR 1049 —mama nassuao M-ALLIG. CR 11!x•_. —�aa- H-ALLIG. CR 1149 M-ALLIG. CR 1200 -NINSIOAROMMIMPUMUSGMAIENIM.2731 H-ALLIG. CR II 256 - - -_ ._ ._.. 1301 - -- L-ALLIS. CR/PATCH 1348 -....---- H-ALL I S. CR liU='') _ ..: MpA}ELONS. CCR 111 1I ` -77'77.777-7 - ''".....,_ M-'A`�'ELIG: C�:/PATCH 1b4• 7:-. . A1116IG. CR I1800 - M-ALLIG. CR 185(5 -samsatommeassamaisansimairoatammulassummaalown PATCH 1902 ----� M-ALLIG. CR 1947 -. _. .. L-TRANS. CR i 2005 ......•151111MMIIMMISIMMEEMINIMia..171 2101 - , 2149 - M-ALLIG. CR 0t _....... ........... - _LIG IF L J: - . _ ..... _. 2401 - _. • • _-_..... H-ALL IG. CR 2449 -iseasmammunasammasamum M-ALLIG. CR IF2S01 - M-ALLIG. CR/PATCH X548 - -----' PATCH F244 — �....... L-TRANS.CR/PATCH X347 --.- r=4E B:E L=OEEIR: E1 299p - ... .. L-TRANS. CR 2950 -masnosoaranwammazunam I_-ALLIG. CR IF 3001 - . ... - PATCH '▪049 - - ----- ---•--- H-ALLIG. C R ▪ l C/ I33 - . HHLA ND DR I I 3500 -romr-r -1 --r-l-rT7--1 , ii., , I rl ,_, , TI , , I I 1 , , I 1 I r I F I 14101 , , 1 , , 1 I ) rj o c_ 20 "�r_ 35 4a SC BRAUN PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. - COMMISSION NO 88-426 I DATE OF TEST (M/DiY): 8/2/89 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FRONTIER TRAIL DAILY ESAL'S: 3.0 TEMPERATURE RANGE (deg.F): 84-84 fram: 177 ' WEST OF K I O W A CIRCLE ASPHALT THICKNESS (inches): 6.0 to: HIGHLAND DRIVE SURFACE CONDITION RATING: 2.3 ISEASONAL CORRECTION FACTOR: 1.64 COMMENTS: (R) AND (L) REFERENCE THE TEST POINT LOCATION TO THE CENTERLINE / MODIFIED SEASONAL CORRECTION FACTOR. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE AXLE LOAD (tons/axle) II 0 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 -1 „ r , I , , , , 1 , , , , I , , , , I „ „ I , , , , I , , , rI , , , , l , , , , l , , , , l 177FT N OF ) IOWA CR' 48 -......ona. maa--- L-TRANS. CR 101 —pwm...\.w...m..�.....w...wo..��...w... ... M-A .( III.I� • . yR/PATCH 1 =w • . :......... t4 TR rh gNrRRCR PATCH • 701 .. ®, M-ALLIG. CR 749 _sanmamtraarmaramcmpasumomosamasomass. PATCH 400 _.._.....d..-...:.,v,.-._-._- ..-"'".,.,-_ _ . . ...... 1I-ALLIG. CR 44b -•- •-m-r•�-�• _.._ „I-ALLIG. CR 501 - °...- _________ _ M-ALLIG. CR ,;5t=) —wwo.aw PATCH II 60[) — • _.o,.,..ormainsa.. M-ALLIG. CR b43 - .....W.�..o.�... ....._._., ...._. ..,.. .. _ __.,.. .. .. ..�..� M-ALLIG. CR 7�)^ - ---w.�.-._. __-. ..._r _-•�� L-TRANS. CR I 747 -® � .. . . - -.. —_ � PATCH - max:..—.-•_.----...._,.;�:F..,.--- pAtitk I G. CF. E �f - _._ 901 - _ .___...__..mania__ ... M-ALLIG. CR . 949 - . _ . M-ALLIG. CR 1001 - _ ,__.____ ._...._... : ..._._....._._.., .. L-ALLIG. CR I - 1649 - M-ALLIG. Cf 1107 — --- '-®�-._.--.__.w....... H-ALL_I G. CR 11 4 9 —.a•-- -......AISPOINAMi - ---- M-ALLIG. C R 1200 -....-... ..__ ..__ _ • . ..,,.... H-ALLIG. CR 1250 -........,..W,,.-• y,,..m._---�.__-__-� H-AL-L I G. CR I 1701 • .._ :. _ .. .. __.amnia. L-ALLIG. CR/PATCH 1 7 4 8 -„rws.,ac•o,. w.sv.a,.....mo.. H-A L_.L I 0. t=P 14O -� --..._.__-a------.--...- __ pATEI:NS. CR 54-7, - ..•..w..a....wmsacca¢wmsco.w.... - -A E LIE:ER/PATCH — _ SISEMOSISMISINUM I_. , 1800 ---.-WY. .. _ .__. ..,....__............. ....... . .._,....,..__....,. 3 :18 5 C) -...w.... .�..ss—anima--n--..w.ww..im.,..ws...ac.w�,ac�w NI-ALL A H I G. C T; ` PATCH M-At_.LIG. CR 19 7 -�'.....-_..Tm..... ,.� _.....a MIII ...�...W........w.�. n - R A i' Ala w CR '?o48 —.w...�.-- .�w.v... .�. . ., hIllFi6.ER '1 - . . ... 49 _......,`.`"--...°�.. M-ALLIG. CR ,n-01 _a.va.,,.io., .....u..... ...o,. 1 �4 r I` O DR 2401 - . _ . .. . . . H-ALLIG. CR 2449 - --owv •..•.4 M-ALL I G. CR 2 501 - . ..... . ®w M-ALLIG. CR/PATCH i 548 _•�..�. PATCH o L " A II- +,6 424 -.......... v...oa.w...w.w.o MIUMIAr........ - 1 R N S. C R/P A T C H • 7`47 —.w....n.nnw...Qro.w.........w..• n !_-ALL I Ss.L ,' ± 2,}E 0 .-.P..P...Y,....11._..._._....._Mw. • y TI G (}'+�[}'� ,' (7 fl. j —w.....rua.vw.,nww....,ew... .aw..ne..w.w...w.,wa —HE I Li. l..fZ 2900 - ..._.. C90 -.ww.nnn.w«.......��..w.......,............ L-ALANS. CR -- mamomatammaimansausawawasinemaummaanamamon•mamouswo — ''..!/(6 PATCH I y, ....lamaxaseasomomaammasetimummaausumumnroomsmaniala C/: H I * LAND DR • 1 3500 -1 , I , , ) , , , , ) r-rTr-F r , r , ) , , , , I , , , , ) , , , , I t , , , I , , , r I , r-i , l 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 ma II . . . ill ....., C IT Y Ilk F ,,,:i\ C 1:i _ . 1:: , I , AS EN , , I _. `°'' 690 COULTER DRIVE • P O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 I (612) 937-1900 April 3, 1989 II Ms. Elinor W. Kerber II400 West 76th Street Chanhassen, MN 55317 IDear Ms. Kerber: Your letter of March 22, 1989 is being forwarded to the Mayor and City Council I members so as to insure that they are aware of your concern. The staff person who will be responsible for reviewing and determining what can be done is our City Engineer Gary Warren. I will forewarn you that Mr. Warren's ability to respond quickly will be difficult. We have three engineering positions which I would normally be given the responsibility, by Mr. Warren, to work with you. Currently, all three positions are vacant and, accordingly, Mr. Warren is carrying out the responsibilities of four people. I am also fearful as to the I conclusions that Mr. Warren will probably reach. I am guessing that your street is over 30 years old. During most of the life of the street, the City did not have a street sealcoat program in effect. During the past 10 years, the II street department, on at least two different occasions, attempted to restore the street via patching/sealcoating. Those programs have not worked. Most of the street has major alligator sections typical of eroded base material. Similarly, there is no curbing to control and direct runoff. What asphalt curbing origi- ' pally existed is virtually non-existent. I am sure these conditions have contributed to the undermining of the base material. II The above comments were made solely based on 20 years of seeing various street conditions and to forewarn you as to probable conclusions. Today engineering equipment exists to determine whether streets can be salvaged and what actions II will be required to do such. Again, Mr. Warren will attempt to get to your problem as soon as possible. Thank you for your consideration. II Sincerely II Don Ashworth City Manager IIcc: Mayor and City Council Gary Warren, City Engineer II 1 27 /Z 4,2, iyf9, . 1 cef4 e_e-e-t44..e. ,1/2e--1 .-J I m 7 6—. —a/ I M - GZ27t..--e-il-,----- 2,.,e,'-e-C-1,ta,i...,z-Va-e_z) z-..e..)-a-- --4.1 - AAA} 7)74i, -/-).4.-/e/i-e) .-f-td ce-ed-4 e-ii , , 4 0 a-Le.). -9-z--0-0-e-L, ,i_.; e,L6-4A/ .--4,-7-z. cz,t- x7i0 a z,u, 7 6i- s. rAL..e."1--- I ,,,;,,, (9,,,e, / 7 ii7i, a)_& -/1_,,,,,,� ' .u4-- Al -1%u> _. I . ` l- a., '-t) 71.44,--g-2-u. .e-eA-ed= '- .- �% cam, -A s GLUE I -liyt� ,ti - /wiz-��� �-� C',1.-t s7!-�.GUS i C i.�� ‘ ,Z•4' -l;d /-Guec -77 GG.G Z- 2 Oze friJ / dd , z 4 i 1 a-,-7-u_, .7-e-6, 7.-z_e_27 . ,,,24, 1)ei-e.-(Z -e--(4.-d_e_. _- --ci; ' 71---et_i • zi/C1-" , M/44 ,' /_-/-L&.t-y/ili /t---1,_.) ,,,C24-(2.--e-C 4/2„,t,„,-,:t-_,,,,4.-'/, . *-4,.i --60 0,,,e4..z._:e-_,,,, A.,,-7_i,-,;_i-K7/_,--L.:y if , , ,..2 , --.,4-:-41e_, I 0..-ez-e-e,-,,- .4-e-L-A-‘: -4---zi a_z-e-- _- 7--/-7-,---.---- (-} „z2-ei-e- ,LZI- 4-e -1 CI,-H, --?'--2-17 (,-,--Z. -1 iia...-i- 4 ''/,, } L„ 1 i s / d--/-6-€-) /&10 / / CtLV -4_74 __d__ /Lt,L.,2:4-4,L,e:2 y- ---ee---A..) . ,,_.,,,,,,,,,2% ;6_)i- 1,_., ,_L. ,/,.,,..c., 26 ,k,,,k._ ,-/Z. ,,,i:.--,- ..-, --e---A2-e-v-H iIL a--,-e--;-7--Ve-4.% , a_.-4,- cJ, I,z_e;:-& cz_f:&-L.,Le.,:e.-- ,e-4,--e-t-ill 9 �-a.6 <4z Si -e Q"� Z 1 _ &_.„5.,.„,rfr':(' /- d.i,„,-,,/ z z% -7e a-eA--.,,' I ,L, o a Z-777 mac, , c__ ti,zz L,; .t, t,i, -77 , .o J g a7 I