Loading...
1k. Electing to Designate Certain Bonds Issued in 1986 as Qualified Tax-Exempt Obligations LeFevere t I Lefler Kennedy' O'Brien R X - As aJ' L plc-K o..d CC A.cs.�e�a I Drawz Y a Professional Association C..*� e .- /a/.r.* iS Sed." text/a a• •..',r) INo coop. Mt.....o Alt CG . �7 M �'1 2000 First Bank Place West r•e. t,• r(.,-. 60 ..1.1.-.1 94 ir inneapolis March 22 , 1989 "'�" "' innesota 55402 /, /**64 At S, e..•,..? To mow• � G s�v,J'.Lwr Telephone(612)333-0543 A-6/P. Telecopier(612)333-0540 City of Chanhassen Ill. Dennis O'Brien 690 Coulter Drive John E. Drawz Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 .3 /zy/P! David J. Kennedy Attn: Don Ashworth oseph E. Hamilton City Manager S e..�i7 /e.7'�m'. w`f St..f e.v ohn B. Dean 4' �yj Ilskc L4, ,c 4 wa.j :.1e«1'. c a! 4 lenn E. Purdue RichardJ Schieffer Re: $195 ,000 General Obligation Equipment Certificates Yilir, CharlesL. LeFevere of Indebtedness of 1986 Tames J. Thomson,Jr. homas R. Galt City of Chanhassen, Minnesota .teven B Schmidt John G. Kressel Dear Don: s' 41 4/c boo 6. o . Z3„.1s _/ /98t mes M. Strommen a 1 7 onald H. Batty illiam P Jordan One of the many features of the Federal 1986 Tax Reform William R. Skallerud Act was a provision dealing with the ability of finan- CavidD Heine cial institutions owning municipal bonds to deduct a avid D. Beaudoin I g p even M Tallen percentage of the interest expense connected with such ary Frances Skala ownership. The new law limited this deduction to those Leslie M Altman bonds of issuing governmental units that issued less imothy J awlenty olfA. Sponheim than $10 million in any calendar year and designated ulieA. Bergh the bonds for that purpose (bank qualified bonds) . Darcy L. Hitesman David C. Roland I are a n A. Chamerlik When the City issued the above listed Bonds the desig- ul D. Baertschi nation as bank qualified bonds was made pursuant to rdenFritz language in the congressional bill under consideration layton L. Leflevere, Retired Ierbert P Lefler, Retired at the time, H.R. 3838 , but when the provision was actually passed with an effective date of August 8, 1986 , the numbering of the relevant section was changed. ICongress apparently feels that it is necessary for the issuers of bank qualified bonds to redesignate the I bonds under the new code section and a provision to that effect was in the Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988. I Because in the resolution authorizing the sale and issuance of the Bonds the City promised to do whatever it could to preserve the tax exempt status of the I interest on the Bonds and the bank qualified desig- nation, we think it important that the election to redesignate be made. A form resolution to that effect I is included for your use. We recommend that it be adopted. I MAR 2 4 1989 CI7_Y-OF CHANHASSEAI March 22 , 1989 Page Two The Treasury Department has offered no guidance as to what to do about the election resolution. Presumably, it is to be filed with the IRS at some point. In the meantime, if you will return a certified copy of the resolution tows we will file it with the bond tran- script, and if a future filing with the IRS is required we will notify you asking for your direction to us to make the appropriate filing. We will not make the filing without the instruction of the City to do so. There is no charge for this service or for any future filing if requested. Yours very truly, LeFEV „ LEFLER, KENNEDY, I O' : 'IENDRAWZ a P, ofessio 7 Association By ► /Ma _ 1 Davi . Kennedy DJK:caw Enclosure cc: Andy Merry ' 0511RESB.F16 /14 ef *)e. 01.1 allifta4 1 4' 400,e∎ ... 44- 4 vh. r`C.S 0/K 4 ' a cr .I+. M E.+� 1 C;Lao...1:/1/4" .34 09 1 _w CITY OF CHANHASSEN Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a ' meeting of the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, was held on the day of , 1989 . The following ' members were present: and the following members were absent: * * * * * * * * * Member introduced the following resolu- ' tion and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ELECTING TO DESIGNATE ' CERTAIN BONDS ISSUED IN 1986 AS "QUALIFIED TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS" ' BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Carver and Hennepin Counties, Minnesota (Issuer) as follows: ' Section 1 . Findings. 1 . 01. The Issuer issued its $195 , 000 General Obligation ' Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness of 1986 (the "Bonds" ) while the federal Tax Reform Act of 1986 was pending with a retroactive effective date , specifically on or after January 1, 1986 , and on or before August 7 , 1986 ; and 1 . 02 . When the Bonds were issued, the Issuer made a desig- nation that it intended or otherwise declared its intent to qualify the Bonds under Section 802 (e) (3) of H.R. 3838 of the 99th Congress as passed by the House of Representatives; and ' 1 .03 . The Issuer covenanted to take such actions as are necessary to effectuate such attempted designation; and (ii) obligations issued to refund (or which are part of a series of obligations issued to refund) obligations issued before August 8, 1986, which were not industrial development bonds (as defined in Section 103 (b) (2) of the federal Internal Revenue Code of 1954 , as amended, as in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of the federal Tax Reform Act of 1986) or a private loan bond (as defined in Section 103 (o) (2) (A) as so in effect, but without regard to any exemption from such definition other than Section 103 (o) (2) (A) ) ; ' (c) the Issuer hereby designates the Bonds as "quali- fied tax-exempt obligations" for purposes of Section 265 (b) (3) of the Code; (d) at the time the Bonds were issued, the amount of tax-exempt obligations (other than private activ- ity bonds , treating qualified 501 (c) (3) bonds as not being private activity bonds) which had been and were to be issued in 1986 by the Issuer (and all entities treated as one issuer with the Issuer, and all subordinate entities thereof) during calendar year 1986 was not reasonably expected to exceed $10, 000, 000; and (e) not more than $10 , 000 ,000 of obligations issued by the Issuer during calendar year 1986 have been designated for purposes of Section 265 (b) (3) of the Code. The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly I seconded by Member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: the following voted against or abstained: whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 0511RESF.F16 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTIES OF CARVER ) SS . AND HENNEPIN ) CITY OF CHANHASSEN ) ' I , the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed Manager of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, hereby certify that I have carefully compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a ' [regular] [special] meeting of the City Council of said City held on , 1989 , with the original thereof on file ' in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcription thereof. WITNESS my hand officially as such Manager and the corporate seal of the City this day of , 1989 . Don Ashworth City Manager (SEAL) ' 0511RESB.F16 I CITY OF CHANHASSEN Pursuant to cue call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, ' was held on the day of , 1989 . The following members were present: and the following members were absent: 1 * * * * * * * * * Member introduced the following resolu- tion and moved its adoption: ' RESOLUTION NO. ' RESOLUTION ELECTING TO DESIGNATE CERTAIN BONDS ISSUED IN 1986 AS "QUALIFIED TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS" BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Carver and Hennepin Counties , Minnesota (Issuer) as follows : Section 1 . Findinas . 1. 01 . The Issuer issued its $4, 615, 000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1986, dated July 1 , 1986 (the "Bonds") while the federal Tax Reform Act of 1986 was pending with a retroactive effective date, specifically on or after January 1 , 1986 , and on or before August 7 , 1986; and 1 . 02. When the Bonds were issued, the Issuer made a desig- nation that it intended or otherwise declared its intent to qualify the Bonds under Section 802 (e) (3) of H.R. 3838 of the 99th Congress as passed by the House of Representatives; and 1 . 03. The Issuer covenanted to take such actions as are necessary to effectuate such attempted designation; and I 1 . 04 . For the Bonds to receive the benefit of being J designated as "qualified tax-exempt obligations" under Section ' 265 (b) (3) of the federal Internal revenue Code of 1986 , as amended (the "Code") , it is necessary that the Issuer make an election under subparagraphs (C) of Section 1009 (b) (3) of the U federal Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988 ("TAMRA") and designate the Bonds pursuant to subparagraph (B) of Section 1009 (b) (3) of TAMRA and Section 265 (b) (3) of the Code; and 1 . 05 . The Bonds qualify for such designation because they are not private activity bonds (or, if private activity bonds , are qualified 501 (c) (3) bonds, or refunded bonds which were not industrial development bonds or private loan bonds) ; the Issuer with respect to bonds issued in 1986 is a "qualified small issuer" of $10, 000 ,000 or less of bonds; and not more than ' $10, 000 , 000 of bonds issued in 1986 have been designated: Section 2 . Election: Designation. ' 2 . 01 . Election. The Issuer hereby makes an election with respect to the Bonds under Section 1009 (b) (3) (C) of the federal Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988 . ' 2. 02. Designation of Qualified Tax-Exempt Obligations. In order to qualify the Bonds as "qualified tax-exempt obligations" ' within the meaning of Section 265 (b) (3) of the Code, the Issuer hereby makes the following factual statements and representa- tions: ' (a) the Bonds are treated as issued on August 8 , 1986, because: (i) the Bonds were issued on or after January 1 , 1986 , and (ii) when the Bonds were issued, the Issuer made a designation or otherwise declared that it intended to qualify the Bonds under Section 802 (e) (3) of H.R. 3838 of the 99th Congress ' as passed by the House of Representatives, and (iii) the Issuer, in paragraph 1 above, has made an election under Section 1009 (b) (3) (C) of TAMRA; and ' (b) the Bonds are not "private activity bonds" as defined in Section 141 of the Code , or, if private activity bonds, they are: I (i) qualified 501 (c) (3) bonds as defined in Section 145 of the Code, or (ii) obligations issued to refund (or which are part of a series of obligations issued to refund) obligations issued before August 8, 1986 , which were not industrial development bonds (as defined in Section 103 (b) (2) of the federal Internal Revenue Code of 1954 , as amended, as in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of the federal Tax Reform Act of 1986) or a private loan bond (as defined in Section 103 (o) (2) (A) as so in effect, but without regard to any exemption from such definition other than Section 103 (o) (2) (A) ) ; (c) the Issuer hereby designates the Bonds as "quali- fied tax-exempt obligations" for purposes of Section 265 (b) (3) of the Code; (d) at the time the Bonds were issued, the amount of tax-exempt obligations (other than private activ- ity bonds, treating qualified 501 (c) (3) bonds as not being private activity bonds) which had been and were to be issued in 1986 by the Issuer (and all entities treated as one issuer with the Issuer, and all subordinate entities thereof) during calendar year 1986 was not reasonably expected to exceed $10, 000 , 000; and I (e) not more than $10, 000, 000 of obligations issued by the Issuer during calendar year 1986 have been designated for purposes of Section 265 (b) (3) of the Code. The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly ' seconded by Member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: ' the following voted against or abstained: 1 whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 0511RESB.F16 ---T- ` 11. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) I COUNTIES OF CARVER ) SS . AND HENNEPIN ) IICITY OF CHANHASSEN ) 1 I , the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed Manager of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, hereby certify that I have carefully compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a II [regular] [special] meeting of the City Council of said City held on , 1989, with the original thereof on file Iin my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcription thereof. IIWITNESS my hand officially as such Manager and the corporate II seal of the City this day of , 1989 . 1 IIDon Ashworth City Manager II (SEAL) II I I I0511RESB .F16 II II