1i. Plat Approval for Kant Subdivision i
,
C I TY 0 F P.C. DATE: Sept. 7 , 1988
CHANHASSEN C.C. DATE: Sept. 26 , 1988
kY CASE N0: 88-23 SUB
Prepared by: Olsen/v
STAFF REPORT
o
PROPOSAL: Preliminary Plat of a 46 ,700 Square Foot Single
Family Lot into Two Single Family Lots of 22,400 and
24 ,300 Square Feet
Z
a
V LOCATION: 3820 Lone Cedar Circle (Lot 4 , Block 1, Cedar Crest)
Q APPLICANT: Ralph and Carol Kant
3821 Lone Cedar Circle
Chaska, MN 55318
PRESENT ZONING: RSF, Residential Single Family
ACREAGE: 46 ,700 square feet
DENSITY: ,u;wn by n�,,,I::.)i
1 . 87 u/a ,
ADJACENT ZONING `:'�o""`i��cr
'.cuifid_____--
AND LAND USE: N- Lake Minnewashta _-�_
S- Highway riz,te t:Hi -,.0::
H< E- RSF; single family ��"
Q W- RSF; single family — �������
W WATER AND SEWER: The site has city sewer and water.
PHYSICAL CHARAC. : The site abuts Lake Minnewashta and Hwy. 5
with a topography sloping towards Lake
Minnewashta.
2000 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Low Density
a
, '
"Witt RD
• • MIMI t PUD-R
Ai
.,
I
al 1,14
u) ,,
X I ,
r
..„0, ,..„,
: . D ,„, .....
I ! : .
, ( , .4 g v. • ______,___ ,
al,....,,unirO
) „
ci, 1 iy____ MAPLE ORES ,
I-
--
0
.,•
---__ 7-,
:f. I
MIN((
.4,4
_ _____ aAl•t l4,ii._-
vgN..tp.i.L.aLI4'.L wr O.o.
LASX,AsYT-Aio
1 N05T o4 iv crr,
i.e„-u z•
0
4.tyv omi imw 4 0 iori t
1-
..-
Now
...16.
TM
ii . II4.°4 ft\y• ',, ,
_
I.
7 ',
... - --
__: ■, ,
. I
'•S
.t.
r ,A.
_
I
■,
•■......■
- --__ _-- -
-- ''...............,...,........7.. .' ' __ _
_ - : -----N
s ,P0/ PP
...7
r
1 . -
t i
c
4
i .
,
,
. 4
4111 It" _
82 NO STRE ET_
i
OF CHANHASSEN
-.4441pimpr. • . . - .
Kant Subdivision
September 7 , 1988
Page 2
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
The Shoreland Ordinance requires minimum lot area of 20 ,000
square feet for riparian lots (Attachment #1) .
The Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum of 90 feet of street
frontage (Attachment #2 ) .
REFERRAL AGENCIES
Public Safety Department Attachment #3
Engineering Department Attachment #4
Building Department No comment
ANALYSIS
The applicant is proposing to subdivide a single family lot into
two single family lots. There is an existing residence located
on the westerly portion of the lot with the easterly portion of
the property proposed to be subdivided from the original parcel .
The property is bordered on the north by Lake Minnewashta and on
the south by Highway 5 with a city street right-of-way located
between the lot and Hwy. 5 (Attachment #5) . The proposed sub-
division maintains the required front and side yard setbacks for
the existing single family residence.
The subject site has a total area of 35 ,900 square feet. For the
lots to meet the required 20 ,000 square foot minimum, the appli-
cant is proposing to vacate a portion of the unimproved city
street right-of-way located between the subject lot and Hwy. 5
(Attachment #6 and shown in green and red on preliminary plat) .
By vacating a portion of the street right-of-way, the lots will
receive additional square footage. Lot 2 , Block 1, will receive
1,800 square feet for a total of 22 ,400 square feet and Lot 1,
Block 1 will receive an additional 9 ,000 square feet for a total
of 24 ,300 square feet. The lots directly to the east of the sub-
_ ject site, Lots 1 , 2 and 3 , Block 1 , Cedar Crest, receive access
from Hwy. 5 .
The City Council will review the proposed street vacation on
September 26 , 1988 .. The preliminary plat approval will be sub-
ject to approval of the street vacation. If the street vacation
is not approved, the proposed subdivision would not meet the lot
area requirement of 20 ,000 square feet.
With the vacation of the street right-of-way, the lots maintain
the required 90 feet of street frontage. Lot 2 , Block 1 , main-
tains street frontage along the remaining street right-of-way and
Lot 1 , Block 1 , maintains required street frontage along Hwy. 5 .
Kant Subdivision
September 7 , 1988
Page 3
There is an existing field drive from the subject site to Hwy. 5
( see plat) . The subject site has access from Lone Cedar via a
gravel drive. The new lot, Lot 1, Block 1, will also maintain
access to Lone Cedar via a gravel drive. It is preferred by the
city and MnDOT that Lots 1 and 2 , Block 1, maintain access from
Lone Cedar rather than using the field drive to Hwy. 5 .
Grading, Drainage and Utilities I
The Assistant City Engineer reviews grading, drainage and utili-
ties in Attachment #4 . I
Miscellaneous
The lakeshore of Lot 1 , Block 1 is bordered by a strip of vege- ,
tation and cattails . Staff is recommending that the lot owner of
Lot 1 , Block 1 , must submit a plan for city and DNR review prior
to installing a dock and removing any vegetation. Complete clear
cutting of the lakeshore vegetation should not be permitted.
RECOMMENDATION I
If the street vacation is approved, the proposed lots will meet
the required lot area for riparian lots and required street
frontage. Staff is recommending the Planning Commission adopt
the following motion:
"The Planning Commission recommends approval of Subdivision
#88-23 as shown on the plat stamped "Received August 15 , 1988"
and subject to the following conditions :
1 . The proposed street vacation must be approved by the City I
Council with each lot maintaining at least 20 ,000 square feet
and 90 feet of street frontage.
2 . A plan for the installation of a dock and removal of any
lakeshore vegetation must be submitted to city staff for
approval . I
3 . The applicant shall submit plans for the construction of the
driveway for Lot 1, Block 1 to the City Engineer for approval
prior to final plat review.
•
4 . The applicant shall obtain written approval by the Minnesota --
Department of Transportation for the construction of the
driveway onto Lone Cedar Road prior to final plat review.
5 . The proposed driveway for Lot 1 , Block 1 shall maintain a
minimum separation of 100 feet from State Highway 5 .
MO
Kant Subdivision
I September 7 , 1988
Page 4
II 6 . A 15-foot utility and drainage easement shall be centered
over the 12-inch diameter watermain for the entire length of
the right-of-way to be vacated.
IIPLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
I The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the
request as presented in the staff report.
CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION
IIIt is recommended that the City Council approve Subdivision
Request #88-23 as shown on the plat stamped "Received August 15 ,
I1988" and subject to the following conditions:
1 . The proposed street vacation must be approved by the City
II Council with each lot maintaining at least 20 ,000 square feet
and 90 feet of street frontage.
2 . A plan for the installation of a dock and removal of any
II lakeshore vegetation must be submitted to city staff for
approval.
II 3 . The applicant shall submit plans for the construction of the
driveway for Lot 1 , Block 1 , to the City Engineer for appro-
val prior to final plat review.
II 4 . The applicant shall obtain written approval by the Minnesota
Department of Transportation for the construction of the
driveway onto Lone Cedar Road prior to final plat review.
II5 . The proposed driveway for Lot 1 , Block 1 shall maintain a
minimum separation of 100 feet from State Highway 5 .
I6 . A 15-foot utility and drainage easement shall be centered
over the 12-inch diameter watermain for the entire length of
the right-of-way to be vacated.
IATTACHMENTS
I 1 . Shoreland Ordinance.
2 . Excerpt from Zoning Ordinance.
3 . Memo from Public Safety dated August 26 , 1988 .
4 . Memo from Engineering dated August 31 , 1988.
I 5 . Plat showing right-of-way.
6 . Proposed vacation.
7 . Lots 1-3, Block 1, Cedar Crest.
I 8 . Planning Commission minutes dated September 7, 1988 .
9 . Preliminary plat stamped "Received August 15 , 1988" .
I
1
Cy
�. Itic ,
c..* ZONING I
§ 20-631
4
re _• : , .,- ,
` -_,400,„i4. c l>nclrtronal uses.
I
'' -G' RSF
p= � ; J�,� rl>1lcviny are conditional uses in an "RSF"
`_" i i) Churches.
(2) Private stables, subject to provisions of chapter 5, article III.
(3) Recreational beach lots.
I
(4) Commercial stable with a minimum lot size off
(Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 5(5-5-4), 12-15-86) five(5) acres.
State law reference—Conditional uses,M.S. § 462.3595. 1
Sec. 20-615. Lot requirements and setbacks.
The following minimum requirements shall be observed in an "RSF" I
additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in this chapter:
subject to
(1) The minimum lot area is fifteen thousand(15,000)square feet. I
(2) The minimum lot frontage is ninety(90)feet, except that lots fronting on a cul-de-sac
shall be ninety(90)feet in width at the building setback line. 1
cc (3) The minimum lot depth is one hundred fifty(150)feet.
I(4) The maximum lot coverage for all structures and paved surfaces is twenty-five (25)
percent.
(5) The setbacks are as follows:
I
a. For front yards, thirty(30)feet.
b. For rear yards, thirty(30)feet.
c. For side yards, ten(10)feet. I
(6) The maximum height is as follows:
a. For the principal structure, three(3)stories/forty(40)feet. I
b. For accessory structures, three(3)stories/forty(40)feet.
(Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 5(5-5-5), 12-15-86)
I
Secs. 20-616-20-630. Reserved.
ARTICLE XIII. "R-4" MIXED LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
ISec. 20-631. Intent.
The intent of the "R-4" District is to provide for single-family and attached residential
I
development at a maximum net density of four(4)dwelling units per acre.
(Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 6(5-6-1), 12-15-86)
1209 I
i,
I
I
'
I.
4
•
1.
NR 83 SIIOF2 E -
I , (
LA.ND MANAGEMENT
minimize flood damages, to maintain property values,and to maintain natural
characteristics of shorelands and adjacent water areas, municipal shoreland
I I ordinances shall control lot sizes, placement of structures on lots, and altera-
tions of shoreland areas.
(1) Lot Size
I ' All lots intended as residential building sites platted or created by metes and
bounds description after the date of enactment of the municipal shoreland
ordinance shall conform to the following dimensions:
(aa) For Natural Environment Waters: Lots not served by public
I ' sewer shall be-least 80,000 square feet (approximately 2 acres) in area
and at least 200 feet in width at the building line and at the ordinary high
water mark (for lots abutting a public water). Lots served by public sewer
and which abut a public water shall be at least 40,000 square feet (approx-
imately 1 acre) in area and at least 125 feet in width at the building line
and at the ordinary high water mark. All other lots served by a public
sewer shall be at least 20,000 square feet(approximately V2 acre) in area and
at least 125 feet in width at the building line.
I ' (bb) For Recreational Development Waters: Lots not served by pub-
lic sewer shall be at least 40,000 square feet (approximately 1 acre) in
area and at least 150 feet in width at the building Iine and at the ordinary
high water mark (for lots abutting a public water). Lots served by public
( � sewer and which abut a public water shall be at least 20,000 square feet (ap-
proximately 1 acre) in area and at least 75 feet in width at the building Iine
and at the ordinary high water mark. All other lots served by a public sewer
shall be at least 15,000 square feet in area and at least 75 feet in width at the
_
I building line.
(cc) For General Development Waters: Lots not served by a public
sewer shall be at least 20,000 square feet (approximately 1/2 acre) in area and
at least 100 feet in width at the building line and at the ordinary high water
mark (for Iots abutting a public water). Lots served by a public se%‘er and
I I which abut a public water, shall be at least 15,000 square feet is area and
at least 75 feet in width at the building line and at the ordinary high water
mark. All other lots served by a public sewer shall be at least 10,000 square
I feet in area and at least 75 feet in width at the building line.
(dd) Substandard Lots: Lots of record in the office of the County
V Register of Deeds on the date of enactment of the Municipal Shoreland Ordi-
nance which do not meat the requirements of NR S3 (c) (1) (aa) through (dd)
may be allowed as building sites provided such use is permitted in the zoning
I district, the lot is in separate ownership from abutting lands and sanitary and
dimensional requirements of the shoreland ordinance are complied with inso-
far as practicable. Each municipal ordinance may, consistent with these
standards and criteria, set a minimum size for substandard lots or impose
I other restrictions on the development of substandard lots, including the pro-
hibition of development until the substandard lot(s) are served by public
sewer and water.
(ee) Exceptions — Exceptions to the provisions of NR S3 (c) (1)
(aa) through (ce) may be permitted for Planned Unit Developments pur-
suant to NR S3 (e) (4).
(2) Placement of Structures on Lots
The placement of structures on lots shall be controlled by the municipal r,
6 ..
i
L
_. _. . . .__ _.._
4:1D.1 „..,_ ,
I
2
: '1' ; ;
NE n CIRCLE :°' �4� ATTACHMENT 1 �I
R.60 ri
' 1 <4.)„/ 3 M
(1 II
:t .` 2 2 II
- 1
O.L. Ei . \ .
•
\ . . .
II I
? �' ..`
i LE `
■ 5 3 �� ' I
Sz• 2 AK E -
VIPS . i.
Ao ; 3 �n , ire
AD ., 1 CD 500\
3. P � : :. j ' I
' , ,,. ..: U
�P� ROBERT, \ . .
s rF0 IRUC• E{T _ .
9-r 2 ��
, I ADD! ' ON. �� i
. , \
Hii
II
in
..'-'11::14 3-
- RFST1 � I
., u7 \
kV
PROPOSED VACATION AND SUBDIVI I • N
I
•
I '
•
•
I
j
.
{•
v; j
Ta,IC V .
I .
2 3 P
1
' �° �' I.
IaRCLE4 } ATTACHMENT 2
I /
V M
A'`' 3 ,It
, • 2
P ',1 - - O.L. B
r '12 5
.4.33.,I. 4 }� O ` ''
Le 5 `%I':
. -. .: --k \\
so . : •
iii .,
..
::.
•.,
,. ,
,.,
„,... .
s z 3 LAkE' ..
• ,V_
7 7T '.:-,'... -,-0
•,!.:i. o `
3 �.:
cr
•�,y',/:"--.:.; Q'6 6o Co- 7 �\
�,• ' • • -? � - ROBERT \ - .. -,. . •-i: -
,J gyp' 3 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS_
5 - �'Z- rF� pUC• ElT 1. \ ,.
....
. . ..,
,.... , .
�- ADDI •• ON \�
._ ..
l _.. .., .
•
^fix ,
45 Sr I \
1 I
9,,as,44:4:4
•
I
• I
/ I
1
•
I •r` • i
•.....v • I
+ 2 v
`
�
. �� i ATTACHMENT 3 RNE n CIRCLE c, a
ai t ` ^1
N,,,'
M
t (v 3 1
2 2 I
O.L. B ..
I._ \ - .
,..:. . .:.'. . .:
3 5143* I •
.....
s,. _ 3 K r ... ... ,
. ......._
•.,.•1•. , .. ..,:.,.
is Zy Pi
DD. i .A: • Z2
.".,, „;,.. 111 ..... .....„ec : .. .
_ • .... : - —
. ,
. . . •
. . •. ....
_ -,,,•
. .. , ,,_.
. ,. ...
. . ...
_ .:.....
• . „...._ . II
.. ,..•
•
¢` 2 R08ERT= \
i.
�
II
J • . �P. 3 �� PROPOSED 30 ft. .
• F 5 �-2— C1,<\NO . OUC. EIT l- \ _
' 1 11,ADDI ' ON. \- ' RIVEWAY/UTILI
\\ TY ESMT.
" / I
•
co, RFs7, I
/.
..... ...,............„...........esnet;"
y I
I
1
I
'
/i
s
I I
i
I
Mi ‘ 111111-- -111110. IIIII--IIIII.. -11111--11111-11111---at- -ma- in --am -MI 1111 Ell NI
;.r .
so ,
k.1
• 3 i .
.... ,.......-,2p ' I
i --,
19
41")
I
o
. o
..- 0 "- `2 IP t<>•• /4 Aitt...z . 7/ -------''' ., ,_:-..,,,,
0 .
, ..
I 1 ----<„„,,, ‘\ '
Sr 4 1
I ,,,.,,,,,,N
-.
\\ •. ,
.
s\ '
.
.._....
1 \
4,„, ..-:),9 7,0.
\
) .
,.)
1.----------„:-// • ,-..--1 ly
/ \ .
...
i,- 2 I /
.. ,
WALDO BUNGER
i ---------I --\\ , ■--
BK60, P555
I
I 03,
07
I xis .
-4-.%
„,..
:
,
. .
'
.
• --,,,.,_,,..
I --'''Th-----------'-'----„,
..114 1
'.........s."`...j
. •..........
I (.1.) --■,.... 1 ...
. 1
UNIVERSITY 430 OF MINNESOTA ■,,..........
BK Ili P
. I .
...go
,
/
/
.
---; I
,
i
..!:/................■-
..,
/
r
/Z 1
cc
/,'
4,,e-,
co,e,
...N.. I
a.
o .
"i '•o 0
__,'"
//// a"
m C. I
..
/
i a
(1)
la
E
I
0 el
----'\..,.,....,.., ------,
• • / ...:
-
.
.,,
i-z-111
(r) =
------------- i.. .
/ UJ as
2
/
, D
I
I
1.4 I
i
//(". ft
I
I .
/// \ I
/ I
..------...„
I . -
t
I .
I I
, /
i• I
/
I
/ /C7.2I
/ '
C\.I ,..,; .
r<
n,--) / i
1
,
1
i
I
1
/ 1
_____ _..
.
‘'N,----
i
I____
3 to ,-----
1 " )
I
I
// r C) °9 --- --
r's4 4.&•-
y/
0 II' I,
/1
--C i ii-
:
0 3 S ---i-
Ar
4.> 0
. P. C ■%S\
I
0 S
I
QP
------__>■-•---"-- --7 CI ..1„.i
I
..9/'
cl'• --- 1 1
),()
. k j,_ .. ,c) i
it(0 I
') 1 G 0::'
Nk^, 1 ••. CY
, \ fx-1 ' ----/------ ------ ______ _____. .
- ---1 ,
__....._
0 ...._
.0-
....
it 1
I
'.s
lis
��t7 A`C7FF WATERSHED BOUNDARY N
U � = y'�
• _•.'. a %
I/ 9�c� � � M I NNFy'y' 9/��^0•
MINNEHAHA CREEK
I LAKE MINNETONKA
WATERSHED DISTRICT
I P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 MIt ESDTA RIVER
BOARD OF MANAGERS: Camille D.Andre,Pres. • Albert L.Lehman • John E.Thomas
James R.Spensley • Richard R.Miller • Robert D.Erickson • C.Woodrow Love
IAugust 30, 1988
II
Ms . JoAnn Olsen
II City of Chanhassen
PO Box 147
Chanhassen , Minnesota 55317
II RE: Subdivision of a parcel located on Lone Cedar Circle
into two single family lots (SUB 88-23)
II Dear Ms . Olsen:
I have received information concerning the above-referenced project. Under
I Rule B: 5(c) this project is exempt from the permit requirements of the
District.
If you have any further questions , please contact me at 473-4224.
II Sincerely ,
II EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES
A Division of James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers
Engineers for the District
1 OZLACI . q04.11..A.th/N„.
Kevin C. Larson , Engineer
1 bt
II
II
I
AU G 3 I 1988
ICITY OF CHANhASSEi'
LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
690 Coulter Drive
Chanhassen, MN 55317
(612) 937-1900
'APPLICANT: jf}Ll7f,i k, CAROL L, k W OWNER: 5 Pt M
ADDRESS '3$2O L,oNE C6PAR C(R, ADDRESS
C/MN/-,455.6 N� MN, 5N-31 7
Zip Code - Zip Code r
TELEPHONE (Daytime )(I2) 474-7963 TELEPHONE
REQUEST: I
•
Zoning District Change Planned Unit Development
Zoning Appeal Sketch Plan
Preliminary Plan
Zoning Variance Final Plan
Zoning Text Amendment
Subdivision
Land Use Plan Amendment x Platting I
Metes and Bounds
Conditional Use Permit
A/ Street/Easement Vacation '
Site Plan Review
Wetlands Permit
PROJECT NAME I
PRESENT LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION
REQUESTED LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION r
PRESENT ZONING
REQUESTED ZONING ,
USES PROPOSED I
SIZE OF PROPERTY
LOCATION I
REASONS FOR THIS REQUEST
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Attach legal if necessary )
1
I
',
City of Chanhassen
Land Development Application y
II Page 2
IIFILING INSTRUCTIONS :
This application must be completed in full and be typewritten
clearly printed and must be accompanied by all infomatin or
II plans required by applicable City information and
filing this application Y Ordinance provisions. Before
to determine the specific ordinance and fprocedural erequirements
II applicable to your application . q ents
FILING CERTIFICATION:
The undersigned representative of the applicant hereb
that he is familiar with the procedural requirement o certifies
II applicable City Ordinances , s of all
II Signed By �/ /
<-=-c-
Applicant _ Date _ U a WR
II
II The undersigned hereby certifies
authorized to make this application the applicant has been
described . on for the property herein
I
Signed By
IIFee Owner Date
II
IIDate Application Received
Application Fee Paid p -�5
O7� � El ( —Zr �C4,—)
City Receipt No.
I
* This Application will be considered b
II Board of Adjustments and Appeals at by the Planning Commission/
meeting , their
II ,
I
I
Planning Commission Meeting
A.-- September 7, 1988 - Page 46
. 0
' PRELIMINARY PLAT TO SUBDIVIDE 46, 700 SQUARE FEET INTO 2 SINGLE FAMILY
LOTS OF 24,300 AND 22, 400 ON PROPERTY ZONED RSF, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE
FAMILY AND LOCATED ON LONE CEDAR CIRCLE BETWEEN LAKE MINNEWASHTA AND HWY.
5, RALPH KANT.
Barbara Dacy and Larry Brown presented the staff report.
Chairman Conrad called the public hearing to order .
' Ralph Kant: I 'm Ralph Kant at the residence, 3820 Lone Cedar . I guess
the only comment I have is that I have been taking care of this land ,
this 60 foot piece, cutting the grass and so on, for 14 years so now I 'm
just asking the City to consider vacating the land. I don' t, in my
conversations with staff and so on, there would be no plan to put a road
in there. In talking with the neighbor to the east, he would like to
have an easement so he can get onto Lone Cedar across that property and I
have no argument with that. That ' s the way it would be developed. There
is the driveway from that property onto Lone Cedar and any easement ,
roadway would utilize that same access onto Lone Cedar . That' s already
in existence .
Emmings moved , Ellson seconded to close the public hearing . All voted in
' favor and the motion carried. The public hearing was closed .
Headla : I think the whole use is appropriate and I agree with the
' staff's recommendation.
Batzli : I don ' t have any questions .
Ellson: Looks clean.
Emmings : Just a key point . Number 2, you want to plan for installation
of dock and removal of lakeshore vegetation to City Staff for approval .
I want that just to say that that plan comes in before there ' s any
installation or removal because otherwise it ' s going to be done in the
' other order . That' s all I ' ve got .
Erhart: I don ' t have any comments .
Emmings moved , Erhart seconded that
the Planning Commission recommend
approval of Subdivision #88-3 as shown on the plat stamped "Received
August 15, 1988" subject to the following conditions :
1. The proposed street vacation must be approved by the City Council
with each lot maintaining at least 20, 000 square feet and 90 feet of
street frontage.
2. A plan for the installation of a dock and removal of any lakeshore
vegetation must be submitted to city staff for approval prior to any
installation or removal .
I
Planning Commission Meeting
September 7, 1988 - Page 47 --�
3 . The applicant shall submit plans for the construction of the driveway
for Lot 1, Block 1 to the City Engineer for approval prior to final
plat review.
4. The applicant shall obtain written approval by the Minnesota
Department of Transportation for the construction of the driveway
onto Lone Cedar Road prior to final plat review.
5. The proposed driveway for Lot 1, Block 1 shall maintain a minimum
separation of 100 feet from State Highway 5. ,
6. A 15 foot utility and drainage easement shall be centered over the 12
inch diameter watermain for the entire length of the right-of-way to I
be vacated.
All voted in favor and the motion carried .
DERAND CORPORATION, LOCATED ON COUNTY ROAD 17, APPROXIMATELY 1/2 MILE
NORTH OF HWY. 5, OAK VIEW APARTMENTS :
A. PRELIMINARY PLAT TO SUBDIVIDE 18. 9 ACRES INTO FOUR R-12 LOTS AND 2
1. OUTLOTS ON PROPERTY ZONED R-12, HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT.
B. WETLAND ALTERATION PERMIT TO DIRECT STORM WATER INTO A CLASS B
WETLAND.
C. SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR 136 APARTMENT UNITS .
Barbara Dacy and Larry Brown presented the staff report. ,
Ellson : What did you say on Powers Blvd . , there ' s going to be a right-in
right-out or you won' t be able to take a left in? 11
Brown: Correct .
Ellson : What ' s going to prevent you from doing that is what I 'm
wondering?
Brown: They would have to create some sort of triangular island out here II
that would prevent that type of movement. The problem with those , we
have a Q-Superette that ' s out there . It has a right-in/right-out island
and they do get abused and the County' s not real favorable on that type
of situation. I know that the applicants are here tonight and wish to
get any suggestions or comments from the Planning Commission so they can
proceed through the process again at a later date. They've indicated to II
me that they'd like to see this done.
Conrad : In terms of traffic analysis right now though Larry, there ' s
nothing that we can react to.
11
. _