The URL can be used to link to this page

E-7. Next Steps Learning Center Site PlanCITY OF CNaNNASSEK 7700 Market Boulevard PC Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.2271190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 7901 Park Place Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www.cl.chanhassen.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Sharmeen Al -Jaff, Senior Planner DATE: May 27, 2014 o1(,,pp SUBJ: Site Plan Review for a 3,000 square -foot Daycare Addition, Next Steps Learning Center — Planning Case #2014 -15 PROPOSED MOTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves a Site Plan for construction of a 3,000 square -foot daycare expansion, subject to the conditions of approval; and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact." City Council approval requires a majority vote of the entire City Council, EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The applicant is requesting site plan approval for a 3,000 square -foot expansion of a daycare center. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within the required 500 feet. Staff is recommending approval of the request with conditions. PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on May 20, 2014 to review the proposed request. The Commission voted five to zero on a motion recommending approval of the site plan request. The May 20, 2014 Planning Commission minutes for this item are attached. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of a Site Plan for construction of a 3,000 square -foot daycare expansion, subject to the conditions of approval; and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact. ATTACHMENTS I. Planning Commission Staff Report Dated May 20, 2014. 2. Planning Commission Minutes dated May 20, 2014. g: \plan\2014 planning cases\2014 -15 Next Steps Learning Center\Executive Summary Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow PROPOSED MOTION: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve a Site Plan for construction of a 3,000 square -foot daycare expansion, subject to the conditions of approval; and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation." SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a Site Plan Review approval for the construction of a 3,000 square -foot daycare expansion (Next Steps Learning Center). Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within the required 500 feet. Staff is recommending approval of the request with conditions. LOCATION: 1430 Park Court (Lot 1, Block 2, Rome Park) APPLICANT: Next Steps Learning Center 1430 Park Court Chanhassen, MN 55317 Mr. Jeremy Spaude Phone: 612 -501 -1493 Jeremy-nslc@yahoo.com PRESENT ZONING: IOP, Industrial Office Park 2030 LAND USE PLAN: Office/ hndustrial ACREAGE: 2.2 Acres 96,010 square feet DENSITY: N/A LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION - MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the City must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi - judicial decision. Planning Commission Next Steps Learning Center — Planning Case 2014 -15 May 20, 2014 Page 2 PROPOSAL /SUMMARY The applicant is requesting a site plan review for the expansion of an existing daycare center. The site is zoned IOP, Industrial Office Park and bordered by Highway 5 to the north, office buildings to the cast and southeast and Riley Creek to the west. The lot area of the daycare site is 2.2 acres and gains access off of Park Court. The site plan is for a 3,000 square -foot addition that will be added along the southwest portion of the building. Materials used on the addition will be identical to those used on the original building: Decorative Concrete Masonry Unit (CMU) with a strip of smooth accent CMU, and windows. The existing playground is located along the north portion of the existing building and is not proposed to change. Parking is located along the south and east portions of the lot. The southerly parking area will be reconfigured and new spaces will be added to accommodate the addition. Staff regards the project as a reasonable use of the land. Based upon the foregoing, staff is recommending approval of the site plan, with conditions outlined in the staff report. BACKGROUND On October 24, 1988, the City Council approved a conditional use permit with a variance to allow the construction of a 6,700 square -foot daycare center with a variance for a parking setback. Planning Commission Next Steps Learning Center — Planning Case 2014 -15 May 20, 2014 Page 3 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6, Site Plan Review GENERAL SITE PLAN /ARCHITECTURE The proposed 3,000 square -foot daycare building addition will be situated northwest of the existing building. With this addition, the total building area will be 9,700 square feet. The site is zoned IOP, Industrial Office Park and bordered by Highway 5 to the north, office buildings to the east and southeast and Riley Creek to the west. The lot area of the daycare site is 2.2 acres. The site is within the shoreland district for Riley Creek. The proposed improvements are 70 feet from the centerline of Riley Exist ng e \�� \\ Building Proposed;,_. Addition s ;c' o: �'4`� roURT Creek at its nearest point. This is compliant with the required 50 -foot setback. to Riley Creek acting as a buffer. There is at least 50 feet of wooded land adjacent The addition is fairly straightforward. Access is gained from Park Road. Existing parking is located to the east and south of the site. The parking will be reconfigured to allow for the addition and add two parking spaces. Existing playground area is located along the northeast portion of the building. The applicant is proposing to utilize the same materials as the existing building consisting of decorative Concrete Masonry Unit (CMU) with a strip of smooth accent CMU, and windows. The accent band was painted and the applicant will match that color. Windows are also used to add an architectural interest. .r �2• �3 The addition including the existing building is located 60.6 feet from the north, 63 feet from the east, and 50 feet from the southwest property line. Site coverage may not exceed 70 percent. The total hard surface coverage proposed on the site is 33.49 %. Planning Commission Next Steps Learning Center — Planning Case 2014 -15 May 20, 2014 Page 4 ARCHITECTURAL COMPLIANCE The proposed addition will match the existing building. The colors and materials will be identical to the existing building. The fagade of the addition viewed by the public contains 50 percent windows and/or doors. LIGHTING /SIGNAGE The applicant prepared a lighting photometrics plan. Light levels for site lighting shall be no more than one -half foot candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. Light fixtures shall be downcast and the light shall be cut off at a 90- degree angle as required by the city code. All fixtures shall be shielded. The applicant has not shown any signs on the site plan. There are existing wall and monument signs on the site. Any modification in signage must comply with the sign ordinance and will require a sign permit. The ordinance requires one parking space per six students. The building capacity is 119 students which translates to 20 parking spaces. The applicant is providing 28 parking spaces. ARCHITECTURAL COMPLIANCE Size, Portion and Placement Entries: The building has a pronounced entrance. Articulation: The building incorporates adequate detail and has been tastefully designed. The architectural style is unique to the building but will fit in with the surrounding area. The building utilizes exterior materials that are durable and of high quality. Signs: All signage must meet the sign ordinance. Material and Detail High quality materials are being used on the building. Color The colors chosen for the building are earth tones. The selection is unique, but blends in with the surrounding buildings. Planning Commission Next Steps Learning Center — Planning Case 2014 -15 May 20, 2014 Page 5 Height and Roof Design The maximum building height permitted is three stories. The building meets the ordinance requirement. The roofline is staggered, adding articulation to the design of the building. The ordinance requires a pitched element on the building. A pitched element is located above the entrance into the building. All rooftop equipment must be screened from views. Facade Transparency The southeast fagade is the only one that will be modified by this addition and it contains more than 50 percent windows and/or doors. ,�.ypx�Eptp / CM NSNMn Loading Areas, Refuse Areas, etc. The existing trash enclosure is located northeast of the existing building. No changes are proposed. SITE PLAN FINDINGS In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the City shall consider the development's compliance with the following: (1) Consistency with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; (2) Consistency with this division; (3) Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing areas; (4) Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; Planning Commission Next Steps Learning Center — Planning Case 2014 -15 May 20, 2014 Page 6 (5) Creation of functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: a. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; b. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; C. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and d. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. (6) Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. Finding: The proposed development is consistent with the design requirements, the comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance, and the site plan review requirements. The site design is compatible with the surrounding development and the existing building. It is functional and harmonious with the approved development for this area. Planning Commission Next Steps Learning Center — Planning Case 2014 -15 May 20, 2014 Page 7 COMPLIANCE TABLE WETLANDS, BLUFFS AND SHORELAND Based upon a review of aerial photography, soils data, the National Wetland Inventory maps, the City of Chanhassen Wetland Inventory and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Wetland Inventory, there is no evidence of any wetland features on site. Further, while there are steep slopes immediately adjacent to the site, they do not meet the definition of bluff. The site is within the shoreland district for Riley Creek. The proposed improvements are 70 feet from the centerline of Riley Creek at its nearest point. This is compliant with the required 50- foot setback. There is at least 50 feet of wooded land adjacent to Riley Creek acting as a buffer. GRADING AND DRAINAGE The existing site drains water runoff in two directions. The runoff from the building, half of the west parking lot and the west half of the property all drain over the surface of the ground to Riley Creek. The existing spillway into Riley Creek has experienced erosion and is in a state of deterioration. The water runoff from the east half of the property, including most of the pavement surface, drains to Park Court to be picked up by the municipal storm sewer system. Ordinance Requirements (IOP) Proposed Lot Area 1 acres 2.2 acres Frontage 150 feet 328 feet Depth 200 feet 471 feet Lot Coverage 70% 33.49% Building Height Principal our stories (50 feet) one story (21 feet) Accessory one story NA Building Setbacks Front yard 30 feet Approx. 60 feet Rear yard 10 feet Approx. 65 feet Side yard 10 feet Approx. 170 feet Riley Creek 50 feet 75 feet Parking Requirements Stalls 1/6 space per student =20 28 WETLANDS, BLUFFS AND SHORELAND Based upon a review of aerial photography, soils data, the National Wetland Inventory maps, the City of Chanhassen Wetland Inventory and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Wetland Inventory, there is no evidence of any wetland features on site. Further, while there are steep slopes immediately adjacent to the site, they do not meet the definition of bluff. The site is within the shoreland district for Riley Creek. The proposed improvements are 70 feet from the centerline of Riley Creek at its nearest point. This is compliant with the required 50- foot setback. There is at least 50 feet of wooded land adjacent to Riley Creek acting as a buffer. GRADING AND DRAINAGE The existing site drains water runoff in two directions. The runoff from the building, half of the west parking lot and the west half of the property all drain over the surface of the ground to Riley Creek. The existing spillway into Riley Creek has experienced erosion and is in a state of deterioration. The water runoff from the east half of the property, including most of the pavement surface, drains to Park Court to be picked up by the municipal storm sewer system. Planning Commission Next Steps Learning Center — Planning Case 2014 -15 May 20, 2014 Page 8 The applicant is proposing to install a dry pond to address the runoff and erosion issues along the slope of Riley Creek. This proposed practice will reduce rates to the steep slope area and will provide some water quality benefit and volume reduction. The outlet for the dry pond will have a rip rap slope constructed to provide energy dissipation. This area should be shown on the overall grading plan and erosion prevention and sediment control practices shall be modified to accommodate this disturbance. The plan calls for the use of a portion of the west parking lot and drop -off area as storage for the larger rain events. Water may pool to a depth of one -half foot. It appears that it may be possible to reduce, although not eliminate, this pooling depth and area by installing a curb cut emergency overflow in the southwest corner of the parking lot. A soils report indicating soil conditions, permeability and slope is required. The scale on the grading plans must be corrected. The existing and proposed elevations must be shown at the corners of the proposed structure. The plan shall be revised to show locations of any proposed stockpile areas. The proposed grades shall be no steeper than 3:1. EASEMENTS A 10 -foot drainage and utility easement runs along the north, east and southeast property lines, whereas a 5 -foot drainage and utility easement runs along the rest of the property's borders PARKING LOT Staff recommends the use of minimum parking dimensions to reduce hard surface cover and aid in the stormwater management of the property. Per City Code §20 -1118, 60° angled parking spaces have a minimum dimension of 9' x 18' spaces and 18.5' aisle widths. The City Code contains a figure to illustrate the required dimensions. EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL Because the proposed plan will result in less than one acre of new impervious, it will not require a General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System/State Disposal System Program (NPDES Construction Permit). The plan must comply with Chapter 19 of Chanhassen City code. Planning Commission Bluff Creek Cottages — Planning Case 2013 -8 July 16, 2013 Page 9of10 LANDSCAPING Minimum requirements for landscaping at Next Step Learning Center include 873 square feet of landscaped area around the parking lot, one landscape island or peninsula, three trees for the parking lot. The applicant's proposed as compared to the requirements for landscape area and parking lot trees is shown in the following table. Applicant does not meet minimum requirements for trees. The applicant shall include a total of three trees. Staff recommends approval of the site plan for the construction of a 3,000 square -foot daycare addition as shown in plans dated received April 18, 2014, subject to the following conditions of approval and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation: Environmental Resources Conditions 1. The applicant shall install a total of three trees around and /or within the parking lot. Engineering Conditions 1. The applicant and their engineer shall explore alternate EOF to reduce pooling depth and area. 2. A soils report indicating soil conditions, permeability and slope is required. 3. The scale on the grading plans must be corrected. 4. The existing and proposed elevations must be shown at the corners of the proposed structure. 5. The plan shall be revised to show locations of proposed stockpile areas. 6. The proposed grades shall be no steeper than 3:1. 7. Staff recommends the use of minimum parking dimensions to reduce hard surface cover and aid in the stormwater management of the property per City Code §20 -1118. 8. The erosion prevention and sediment control plan must be compliant with Chapter 19 of Chanhassen City Code. Required Proposed Vehicular use landscape area 873 s . ft. >873 s . ft. parking lot 3 trees I trees -Trees/ Islands or peninsulas/ parking lot I island/ eninsula 1 island/ peninsula Applicant does not meet minimum requirements for trees. The applicant shall include a total of three trees. Staff recommends approval of the site plan for the construction of a 3,000 square -foot daycare addition as shown in plans dated received April 18, 2014, subject to the following conditions of approval and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation: Environmental Resources Conditions 1. The applicant shall install a total of three trees around and /or within the parking lot. Engineering Conditions 1. The applicant and their engineer shall explore alternate EOF to reduce pooling depth and area. 2. A soils report indicating soil conditions, permeability and slope is required. 3. The scale on the grading plans must be corrected. 4. The existing and proposed elevations must be shown at the corners of the proposed structure. 5. The plan shall be revised to show locations of proposed stockpile areas. 6. The proposed grades shall be no steeper than 3:1. 7. Staff recommends the use of minimum parking dimensions to reduce hard surface cover and aid in the stormwater management of the property per City Code §20 -1118. 8. The erosion prevention and sediment control plan must be compliant with Chapter 19 of Chanhassen City Code. Planning Commission Bluff Creek Cottages — Planning Case 2013 -8 July 16, 2013 Page 10 of 10 9. The applicant must procure and comply with all required approvals from applicable jurisdictional agencies. 10. The rip rap slope must be shown on the plans and erosion prevention and sediment control practices shall be modified to accommodate this disturbance. Building Official Conditions 1. The building addition is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system. 2. All plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. Detailed occupancy and building area- related code requirements cannot be reviewed until further information is provided. 4. The owner and/or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. Planning Conditions 1. All rooftop and ground equipment must be screened from views. 2. Any new signs must comply with the sign ordinance requirements. 3. Light levels for site lighting shall be no more than one -half foot candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. Light fixtures shall be downcast and the light shall be cut off at a 90- degree angle as required by the city code. All fixtures shall be shielded. ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation. 2. Development Review Application. 3. Reduced Copy of Plans dated "Received April 18, 2014 ". 4. Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Mailing. gAplan\2014 planning cases\2014 -15 next steps learning center expansionnstaff report.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of Next Steps Learning Center for a Site Plan Review for the Construction of a 3,000 square -foot daycare expansion — Planning Case No. 2014 -15 On May 20, 2014, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Next Steps Learning Center for a Site Plan request for the construction of a 3,000 square -foot daycare center addition for property located at 1430 Park Court (Lot 1, Block 2, Rome Park). The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed site plan preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned IOP, Industrial Office Park. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan Office / hndustrial. 3. The legal description of the property is Lot 1, Block 2, Rome Park. 4. In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the city shall consider the development's compliance with the following: a. Consistency with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; b. Consistency with this division; c. Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing or developing areas; d. Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; e. Creation of functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: 1. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; 2. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; 3. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and 4. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terns of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. f. Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. 5. The planning report #2014 -15, dated May 20, 2014, prepared by Sharmeen Al -Jaff, et al, is incorporated herein. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Site Plan. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 20th day of May 2014. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY: Its Chairman 2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RECEIVED - 7700 Marke Boulevard Mailing Address- P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 APR I 11120 CITY OF CHEASSEN Phone: (952) 227 -1300 / Fax: (952) 227 -1110 CW MASSIDIRAN11111111IpDEPt APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT II'' B /REVIEW Date Filed: 'i-- ^ 60 -Day Review Deadline: �--I"1 �- I'T Planner: cuRS Case MA)I Section •• • •• ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ........................$600 ❑ Subdivision ❑ Minor MUSA line for failing on -site sewers ...... $100 ❑ Create 3 lots or less .............. ...........................$300 ❑ Create over 3 lots ...................... $600 + $15 per lot ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Metes & Bounds ........................ $300 + $50 per lot ❑ Single- Family Residence ...... ...........................$325 ❑ Consolidate Lots .............................................. $150 ❑ All Others .............................. ...........................$425 ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ......................................... $150 ❑ Final Plat* ............................. ...........................$250 ❑ Interim Use Permit *Requires additional $450 escrow for attorney costs. ❑ In conjunction with Single - Family Residence..$325 Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. ❑ All Others .............................. ...........................$425 ❑ Grading >_ 1,000 cubic yards .......................... UBC ❑ Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way ................... $300 (Additional recording fees may apply) ❑ Rezoning ❑ Planned Unit Development (PUD) ...................$750 ❑ Variance ............................................................... $200 ❑ Minor Amendment to existing PUD .................$100 ❑ All Others .............................. ...........................$500 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit ❑ Single - Family Residence ............................... $150 ❑+ Sign Plan Review ........................ ...........................$150 ❑ All Others ....................................................... $275 I�1 Site Plan Review ❑ Zoning Appeal ........................... ...........................$100 Administrative ....................... ...........................$100 Commercial /Industrial Districts* ......................$500 ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment ............................ $500 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area -(3V) Include number of existing employees: NOTE- When multiple applications are processed concurrently, and number of new employees: �` AAW the appropriate fee shall be PP charged for each application. 9 ❑Res idential Districts .............. ...........................$500 (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal Plus $5 per dwelling unit information that must accompany this application) ADDITIONAL REQUIRED FEES: Notification Sign TOTAL FEES: $ .................... ............................... $200 to install and remove) L 3 &rtle(City i— Ntx� Lsn t Property Owners' List within 500'......... $3 per addre §s I y Received from: (City to generate — fee determined at pr . lication meeting) Escrow for Recording Documents .$50�per document U Date Received: Check Number. f� o, (CUP /SPR/VAC/VARNVAP /Metes & dds Subdivision) Section 2: Required Information �Apt L Project Name: y/)GHC 1 nr� Property Address or Location: /4(-30 129c-,k r Parcel #: 25- 75-/ 0 0 a O Legal Description (� �t�oCIC a, eyn� " •-K _ _J- Total Acrea e: 9 �• � Wetlands Present? ❑ Yet-JZ No Present Zoning: �1R 3�IT�?�� (� rr/r irGrk Requested Zoning: _ Present Land Use Designation: tai �t�P 'yt �� I Requested Land Use Designation: ✓ne Existing Use of Property: Description of Proposal: '=150 -A�- *a-a �&—Of eefd,hcti i( C�c rn- a, enc/ 49M ❑ Check box if separate narrative is attached Section 3: Property Owner and Applicant Information APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Contact: Address: Phone: City /State /Zip: Cell: Email: Fax: Signature: Date: _ PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: r- a+�cl� Nexk- Address: l i 3 D`� CC EYE E City /State /Zi�G cS jc-P A?/✓ Email: Signat Contact: S6 Phone: Cell: (0 1Z—S0i -/Y Fax: Date: -7111T1-1!4 This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: Addres City /St; Contact: Phone: Cell: Email: /vr y P .ei7.G4e� .Lx3,^ Fax: Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? *Other Contact Information: Property Owner Via: ® Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Name: cv c- Applicant Via: [-I Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Address: f 7- I1J- 0^,4F Engineer Via: frEmail ❑ Mailed Paper Copy City /St to /Zip: Other* Via: 77Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email: c va >� t \1 11 \ n 1 \ 1 1 1 \ 1 \ \ \ I NEXT STEPS LEARNING CENTER EXPANSION nom: W.t f , •""`gym, ' :AA t 4 \ \ ` �\ \ I a / I III II I \ \I I t ^„ C� •. vA. A.a vat'. r \ F / a i SALE IN FEEL f EEIR X O YY / / / / i / PnDPEKTV DESGKIPT,.. ml z e on 1. a P4e1. a<r,ra.q 1. H r'o-a am R-" caner uamy war.eaala PROPEPT' ADDRESS Ir)D Park C1, CM1mM1aaen. MN EUi) OTES N- d 10by Prenlr LOW Surnwnq 2 131/Pb, pr eE by Rzd Wmztl ,4 Peb a on q' Daphne Sbla pie Ctl Ce H' a ..... 51 ." to v —'Hy I- Ii. area, 1, IN, wq .d .I ba ,,decd SHEET MDE% h'n9 L,1 and h,G,q Pon Ire. p ... —, m \ & E � mm EIEV, ssxsl (xnw Ee) \ a \ :,•' PARK.... _..... COURT PARKING LOT SERION LEGEND — ®— O ERIDI r.. Mx TdN—TINS TM RMINIL Cli1'0FCHANHASS&' RECEIVED APR '18 2014 CHANHASSEIV PLANNING DFPI' KA ..IO Ors PenNis u 6` Q8 Sri 5� uv "± Z V i 404 SxECT DE a HEE1S SCANWI 11T` OF RNE SSEt: ECE CAN APR 16 2014 GHANHAMEm PLANNING iVill RALLIO �� L \♦ Engineering \.` ` sus E, NP 6�x aye 00Se o' -.E END iD0". / F9+3o0„ BE \ CCNCREIE NE \ C m +'�^ 5 \ `• �\ woE \ ` i B c \ I 8 msxo r` i x o io 90 % SCALE IN rtET yy/_ \ S% \-OEOIE MLLE [ABec Iwf n U \ EE ` `\ SIM. a. n uOSf BE XOND PLACED '- I, 0 AMIEVE DEEIISO C[CTON DRY POND RIPRAP SLOPE DETAIL h u k z eERU— ERN MOO sW s PE 1. EG STAKE SOD ON MEN SICf Of BERM ye SEC I BE —i0R 9698 O PVC ROUNT GVM9� III END IS -4' PVC Ai O.BA 8 - UwuN RNaM R NDE a' FW sfT {' PM. 6Y LMwfR PM PR EinBN ANO \EC£1nnIXJ PRO Xfxnax AT xuv T 3 NO BILL BE IN ttIX.GNG WF3 9101ND RE PROTECTED x _ ' S Y 1. UAET "NS pnau �5 <vES E rero[xTs TOP EAROMD PWENEAN ( 2� CPN BE PEACm ENnISNNUT FOR CUBIC PROrtDLIND 1909 L `I'}� "` NPRAP MPE sR[[I )i f III ST R'LERD ED BRITTOM OF ONES sR SECTS. DRY POND OUTLET DETAIL 3 sxEfrs 11T` OF RNE SSEt: ECE CAN APR 16 2014 GHANHAMEm PLANNING iVill het,; s� V \ d I R'J�. Al M 0 ^7 �J9eX�� yyv A J AD 1 t el^ I ( \I \r, \ I R'J�. Al M 0 ^7 �J9eX�� yyv A J AD Y V' el^ I ( \I \ s\ / 9X /a / / U ° / / /0 0 i � v / e 4 TREE INVENTORY - PROVIDED BY OWNER lreea rmg fi '1990' ."in w o e q oG q Le5a 4 c a enslmq 10'90 Ir ide or to, .,,old m AD TREE REMOVALS .— mnr m an m x' — tn'e'emo.a. n I. m O1 'A —V-oo VAOO .11 ee removed. uNDSuPING NOTES nl M 'n9 ' • a e "wool o".Al 10 l'e aVNevaN' Sh11W v h poaa nul to e'e blidog on nst— od h Ineogwtn9 It, 0e. oen iosol0. lama lot paved A Ee grass OeN 'em M .ill TREE REOaCEmENTE s(�r ales Nall I' E E }I BB p eNRUe9 M OOV 111,11 (XPM M) TO wRe PARK , COURT LEGEND -- .w. -� o KALLIO 5S� ZV L OR 5� � §f i CWSTWCVM "D, 9�dali .......... k _ FPWIIDT 6 mr modre.n (_ I400N 3 E 93 ON— IDEI 5N[E,E ;:rry UCHANHASSEC FEMME) APR 18 2014 NWASSEN PLANNING IIF �T a ,or --=- - - - - -- _ ----------------- Or'pinp8e \ \ I✓ry N �- q2s \ \\ e x \\ 0 30' 60• Next Steps Learning Center 1430 Park Court Chanhassen, MN 55317 � .q'� Ed :ana ewlana ].aa�•e. It Evlst c"" sltl 'N' 0.0 z n. 41zt. It ornge 1rvm 1. sp it \ °o Wm' wm tl- • s e. pr Coven 3t.a]9ssa. ft. C1 \\ o f's+ \ CENEPPL SIZE NO]E5: of 01 �I I I QI �I .I CITY RECEIVE SSEP �'e APR 2014 CHMHASSEN PLANNINOI)FPT / \ o e 328.40' (pia t) v la � r ➢ruino0e & Ut lit -. —._ _ �..� _ __.__ __ __.__.__.__.__ __ _,�� qq _° I / \ 0 30' 60' ��. j \ Next Steps Learning Center 1430 Park Court Chanhassen, MN 55317 Hard Cover Calculations ��\\ \\ �• \ / a (u xy k�,' Lot Sizei 96,010 Sq. ft / 220 Acres \:.... o • e_ Is Existing Bolding 7,085 sq. ft. \ z. .➢ rP : 'K E'stn9 Canopy 222 sq. ft. Ex isti ag Bit Surface 26556 sq. Pt. E st Coal. S'd Ik 1,954 Sgft. C71 \ o \Jl \ \ .Id, Ex st Storage Sh tl 120 q, ft \ Pro P. Net 6a', 512 s ft Har . \ iota! Hard Cover s 31,4J9 q, ft, X11 A �Q 4.,�' ' „a"ap Hard Cover X: 3279 z 7-1 6A �2n NN \ \ �1 p, �• C n.o c'g Og BS dI \ Top n not ut of fire hydrant Elev 95161 n 1 A A \ 41 �'' o� •ham e+ �' ,n �\ CITYRECEIVEA EN in ", F1 \s m srtic ; PARK COURT r APR 1 " 2014 `�rti� CHANHASSENPLANNWSDEPT �\ / V/ SCANNED LATYOFCHANHASSEM RECEIVED APR 18 2014 CHANHASSEN PLANNI NQ DEFT L1J.JI.IL•J mm o�m ®mm��m L1J.JI.IL•J ,; ry RECENHA EPA APR 18 2014 (:HANHAS$EN PLANNING DEPT ,..- U SCANIN6ED rT- SCANIN6ED Existing Conditions Survey/ Proposed Improvements —for — Next Steps Learning Center Property Address: 1430 Pads Count Chanhassen, MN 55317 Descripf /on of Property Surveyed: Lot 2, Block 1, ROME PARK, accouding to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota. Hard Cover Calculations: Lol S:e: 96,910 +a. Al2.20 Acres &Item, au W,, 1,095."A Erif, Canopy. 2225p. R. ENINIsassee_ 2(5555q.ft . Cenc. Siwewalk. 1,9815q.R E+kG S'suee She C: 12o, A, Pm P. SN9 -Net Gain: 418 sq. N. PNp.Petkine'Nel Galn: S.., k 11.I.Corer: 32,167 ap.A Hate Gvs, %, MAB Parking Eu'Yina P +gen9 Sl +ll+: ze RepwJPeMgq SM1Ma: 2A .1G 2 I STATE HIGHWAY No. 3 wx��>wna� u�na+�.ry�uW 1- u�.zl,�.� wwu.awwgexm UINltiea._wes" uaaurvay'sed IOS"... Prepared EY resever -",PP, INC Pdol to any Govation IM COnlgnw la required. contau the opher srere are Cax C...,I l651 -sk'W2 ro Faro IM ves son uM Nv Gties in (rte area ecCY I.N een. l� 10� \`� HASSEV ED 2014 NINA oFPT PREMIER LAND LevuFSamn - LLC REVISED BIG `KA - nANU SURFACE CALCULATIONS REVISED 0 1,L7114 -PROPOSED PARKING LOT PROPOSED PARKING LOT iAND ADDIVONAL TWO I STATE HIGHWAY No. 3 wx��>wna� u�na+�.ry�uW 1- u�.zl,�.� wwu.awwgexm UINltiea._wes" uaaurvay'sed IOS"... Prepared EY resever -",PP, INC Pdol to any Govation IM COnlgnw la required. contau the opher srere are Cax C...,I l651 -sk'W2 ro Faro IM ves son uM Nv Gties in (rte area ecCY I.N een. l� 10� \`� HASSEV ED 2014 NINA oFPT PREMIER LAND LevuFSamn - LLC • a=4 4s bs roi t, ha.' . a a -a� a, a a � CiYYOFCHANHASSEtI RECEIVED �. , Sa?. :f L L s 1. jn b.. h. b. '. hs h. b 1r'1s 1 ]a 1.' \, 1, bt, a1 a, b. APR 1 S 2014 �♦ o. o Iw b b 1, 1. L. Li I �. - Ls 1n Ea `, a\ tr ba 1, ,b Sa .a b L )n d a. 1 .. •.. ar h a b A ,0 1a }2 5 11 L Ls E to hs b ti. a CNAMHA ■� p ��@ p� ��q /� (- NPLAVIdINO OP f , ,;. ... •.. m E, ar a rox as -m. -p: a, a.: e,... .. ... ... 1. h, b. b a: ° E3 .il :5 _ Z p • ...... N. ..s '...1. ^• n .. _i a ' °a ..i r. ... .. :q Plan View Scale:1 inch= SO Ft. flPB Li9M1tin9 PreParetl FOr: Iab Name: Xale:as no[etl RAS IIO WtlIOw AVp, NOrNViIp,N1 0]64] Karp Exe, °.,e.w..a..,..N .... ®......�...^.a.wn flOUZERGROUP ll3l Parktwrt L I G H T I N G !ol[PNUmbPr:ldBB]1i -1000 ..`...... .m._......�,..,. 2]39Wlnneda AVPNa CMnM1assen,MN 5531] pah:3 /1B2g10 fax NOmMr:I New Hope, MN 5502] LigM1iing layout designed rdc W or— ral1233 Email Ptltlress:wwx.rabxedmm _ •°" " ° ° " "" '°" "°"°'_ °'• ° "'°_" ° °""" ° "` ° ° " ° "" °`"" ""`• >6 }5443145 VersianC Wawn By. Mike MIINklewia um, end apemk, ¢n]I11tttGd cet(Ohfl. Filename:\1 RAB - STOPPLE- 1\DOa \SalesUpplizalionz Engineer ngVob Flles \R \ROUZU Gaoup \VIWng EleplticUAlnneapolls- Manka[o 103883V-Cam FxleriorUGl Fllez\flEVISED 2V Care Exterior Layout031] WC.RGI Page 1 of 2 all c�tr RECEIVE S�Et ,,PR '18 2014 A2: ALED3T78 x2 @180° C: WPLED52 CwMIHT;S8EI`� �P!NINfi (�� ' � PS4- 11 -20D2 The [g: resitsu ossfattor(LLFHsted.Thttaf many redult leSCnlylamplomenmern/IationlLLq M1asbcen apprAdhothe turers ulatM esoltmnlessaNerwise notedTM1e LLD is the result lgwfientl of mean lumens /Infial lumens per lamp manufaRUrers' xpecificatipn. Illumination wines shown lnmolondlei(OF Lux greguestedlarethe predicted reSultafor planeSdalmlation ether ho p tal, ventral criuloada5de situated in Me <alculatlM proper, sapermartation i5 normal rots pWnedcalmighlon. Thecalalaled re5ullsofthis lighting shnudrbn represent an antitlpeted romalon oft"manwrformarce. Actual mea cured msdts may vary tom the ant M pled pedormanm and are sublett to means and meMods winsh are beyond the mmml of Me Fighting, ol. Mounting sight determinatlan is fob site speaf . our lig simulations assume a mounting height onsmion point of the Iunemaire IIAQ As beta4n Atthe top of the Wns pal for ceiling mounted luminaires and at the bottom of the rymMl for all other lumimire mounting configurations. MB Li"ing Prepared Fa: bb Name: Stak:as mart ... Ludlow Are,Nohhvales N10T60 Kare �acenor RAN BOUZEBG�UP 1030PaAlCprt Dale'.3 /IB /1014 L I G H T I N G `Voice Number: 1 888722-1000 .11WArmtki AVe Na Commassen,MN 5531/ iax NUmsr:l,888722 -1232 New Hope. MN 55422 Ll,hting Learnt daSlglMdbecarditandid& Enwd Addteai:wwwlabxeb.rom 26Y5K31,e vasionC Orawn By. Mike MlnNiewicz engineeeedtopedorm Fllears—kk MB- STOMGE- 1 \Doa\Sales\Applicabom Engumeringdob FileAF\Bouzer Gomp \Yking EleancWinneepolis- Mankato 103883U {are &briorlAGI fleppMS D 2VOre&Ierior Layout O31714CAG1 Page 2N2 Calculation Summary label GI<Type Units Avg Max Min Avg /Min Max /Min Description PtSplir P[Spcyb Meter Type Area Illuminance Fc 0.51 10.1 0.0 NA. N.A. Readings Taken Lumirulre Schedule Symbol Dry Teg Lab N Arrangement Lum.LUmens Arc. Lung. Lumens LLF Description Lum. Watts Arr.WMU Total Watts Fllewma 294.8 1 A2 ALED3T78 x2 @180° BACK-BACK 6911 13822 a[D' -0 "AFG 10 10 Horizontal Lumirulre Schedule Symbol Dry Teg Lab N Arrangement Lum.LUmens Arc. Lung. Lumens LLF Description Lum. Watts Arr.WMU Total Watts Fllewma 294.8 1 A2 ALED3T78 x2 @180° BACK-BACK 6911 13822 1.000 ]8wT pre 111 ]8.4 156.8 156b ALED3TJ8- Cool- R179605.1E6 y. 1 C WPLED52 SINGLE 5896 5896 1.000 52w Wallpad-15 °Up[il[ 607 607 60.] WPLED52- Cool- RL]9]SO.ies Wminaire Location Summary LumNO Ta (0ryl Label X Y MTG I/T Orient Tilt I C(1) WPLED52 238.3 294.8 14 332.]93 0 2 A2 (2) ALED3TJ8x2 @180° 2682 260.4 20 557]4 0 Total Quantity: 2 dFMLMdtl'HOL'� CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on May 8, 2014, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Next Steps Learning Center Site Plan Review — Planning Case 2014 -15 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A ", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. KaWn J. E ge dt, Del+ ty Clerk Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of M 2014. - z-0� Notary Pu is nnnnNV+n!N!Nhnn� R KIM T. MEUWISSEN Notary Public- Minnesota M, com9yWon E*W jw 91, 2016 Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, de ending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Site Plan Review with Variances for a 3,000 Proposal: square -foot building expansion on property zoned Industrial Office Park (IOP) —NEXT STEPS LEARNING CENTER Applicant: Jeremy S aude Property 1430 Park Court (Lot 1, Block 2, Rome Park) Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us /2014 -15. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen AI -Jaff Questions & by email at saliaff(fti.chanhassen.mmus or by phone at 952 - Comments: 227-1134. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public headng before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial /industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson /representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Site Plan Review with Variances for a 3,000 Proposal: square -foot building expansion on property zoned Industrial Office Park (IOP) — NEXT STEPS LEARNING CENTER Applicant: Jeremy S aude Property 1430 Park Court (Lot 1, Block 2, Rome Park) Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us /2014 -15. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen AI -Jaff Questions & by email at saliaff(c ci.chanhassen.mmus or by phone at 952 - Comments: 227 -1134. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial /industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson /representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. DAVID SWARTOUT K & L PARTNERS MUSTANG LLC 10028 INDIGO DR 14417 LAKE STREET EXT 7860 PARK DR EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347 -1206 MINNETONKA, MN 55345 -2923 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -9294 PRN MUSIC CORPORATION 7801 AUDUBON RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8201 TWO S PROPERTIES INC PO BOX 25025 GLENDALE, CA 91201 -5025 SPAUDE HOLDINGS LLC 1430 PARK CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8901 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DOT 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD MAILSTOP ST PAUL, MN 55155 -1899 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MAY 20, 2014 Chairman Aller called the meeting to order at 7:00 pan. Andrew Aller, Mark Undestad, Lisa Hokkanen, Maryam Yusuh, and Steve Weick MEMBERS ABSENT: Kim Tennyson STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; Sharmeen Al -Jaff, Senior Planner; and Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer PUBLIC PRESENT: Dan Campion 340 Trappers Pass PUBLIC HEARING: NEXT STEPS LEARNING CENTER: REOUEST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW WITH VARIANCES FOR A 3.000 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING EXPANSION ON PROPERTY ZONED INDUSTRIAL OFFICE PARK (IOP) AND LOCATED AT 1430 PARK COURT (LOT 1. BLOCK 2. ROME PARK). APPLICANT: JEREMY SPAUDE, PLANNING CASE 2014 -15. Al -Jaff: Chairman Aller, members of the Planning Commission. Brief correction to the staff report. Initially we said that this will appear before the City Council on May 20`s. We're actually, I'm sorry June. It was said that in the staff report that this would appear before the City Council on June 9'. We're actually moving it to May 27' so just minor correction. Aller: Okay so for the record that will be May 27, 2014 and for those individuals at home or present that are watching this item, the reports are found on the Chanhassen website as well so please go ahead and take a look at those before the meetings. Al-Jaff: The site is located at 1430 Park Road. It is bordered by Highway 5 to the north and Park Court to the east. Riley Creek runs to the west of the subject site. The site is zoned Industrial Office Park. It is accessed off of Park Court and there is a daycare center on the site as well as a, a daycare on the site as well as a play area to the north of the daycare center. Just a brief background on this site. Back in October of 1988 the City Council approved a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a daycare Center. There was also a variance that was granted and the variance is for the parking lot. The parking area that is located immediately to the southeast comer, portion of the site. City code requires that it maintains a 10 foot setback and in this case it was at zero and it was to provide parking for the site that's immediately to the west of the subject site. Or to the east, I'm sorry. The proposal before you today looks at adding a 3,000 square foot addition to the site. The addition will be located southwest of the existing building and the total area for both the addition as well as the existing building is going to be approximately 10,000 square feet. They, the building meets all ordinance requirements. Bluff Creek is located to the west of the subject site. City Code requires that it maintain, all structures maintain a minimum of 50 feet from the center line of the creek. In this case it exceeds 70 feet at the closest point. In addition to that there are trees throughout this area and they will remain undisturbed so all of these requirements are met. As far as parking goes, the city code requires 1 parking space per 6 children. They will have a capacity of 119 kids within this building. That translates to 20 parking spaces. They are providing 28 parking spaces. As far as the building itself and the architecture, this is the area that will be Chanhassen Planning Commission — May 20, 2014 added. This is what any individual that will be approaching the building, that would be the fagade that they will see. They are introducing an entrance and it is pronounced. You will be able to see it and locate the entrance into the building. Fenestration as well as transparency meets ordinance requirements. Keep in mind that this is an existing building so we're just trying to meet the exact same standards as the existing. Materials are shown, there we go. Okay, materials again they match the existing building. Face block as well as EFIS. And then the frames of the building will also, frames for the windows will also match the existing building. Staff is recommending approval of this site plan for the construction of 3,000 square feet of daycare expansion subject to conditions in the staff report and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. I'll be happy to answer any questions you may have. Aller: Any questions? Weick: Is there? Allen: Mr. Weick. Weick: Yeah. Is there, it looks like there was, is there water? Some kind of runoff or something added? Is that new? Or what is that feature I guess? The blue. Aller: Retention pond? Al -Jaffa Correct. It's a retention pond and it's a day. Go ahead Alyson. Fauske: I'd be happy to answer your question. The proposal before you and the area outlined in blue and shaded in blue is intended to be a dry pond and what a dry pond is, is it collects water after a rainfall event and slowly and eventually that, the entire amount of water that's in that basin will dissipate and discharge down the slope so the intent is to try to mediate, mediate an erosion issue that exists on the site. Aller: And then to follow up with that, the addition of the 28 parking spots, is that going to be a problem with the erosion or runoff? Fauske: That was factored into the design so the applicant's engineer worked with staff in order to accommodate the additional discharge rates and with the proposed pond in the existing in place system they meet the requirements. Aller: Great. Again any questions? Alright, thank you. If the applicant wishes to step forward and make a presentation they can do so. They don't have to but if they'd like to that's fine. Or just introduce yourself would be great. Jeremy Spaude: Sure, Jeremy Spaude, 1430 Park Court. I think Sharmeen covered it well. We're just looking to add a gym and really make our entrance and our parking lot flow really well for what we have now. Aller: Welcome sir. And you've had a copy of the report and you've reviewed all the conditions. Jeremy Spaude: Correct. Aller: And you're willing to do anything with the City or at least work with the City to make sure that the requirements are met. Jeremy Spaude: Correct. Yep, Sharmeen's been a great partner. Chanhassen Planning Commission — May 20, 2014 Aller: Wonderful. Any other questions or anything you'd like to say? Jeremy Spaude: Nope, I think we're good. Aller: Perfect, thank you. At this point we'll open the public hearing portion of this matter. Anyone wishing to speak either for or against the item can step forward at this time and do so. Seeing no one coming forward I'm going to close the public hearing portion and open it for discussion then if any. It's an addition to an existing building. It meets the hard cover requirements and they've taken into account the impact in creating the dry pond so it looks pretty straight forward. Weick: There were only minor additions, yeah. Aller: Anyone wish to make a motion? Yusuf. I'll make the motion. Aller: Okay. Yusuf. The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve a site plan for construction of a 3,000 square foot daycare expansion subject to the conditions of approval and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. Aller: I have a motion. Do I have a second? Weick: Second. Aller: I have a motion by Commissioner Yusuf, seconded by Commissioner Weick. All those or any discussion? Further discussion. Yusuf moved, Weick seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve a Site Plan for construction of a 3,000 square -foot daycare addition as shown in plans dated received April 18, 2014, subject to the following conditions of approval; and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation: Environmental Resources Conditions 1. The applicant shall install a total of three trees around and /or within the parking lot. Engineering Conditions 1. The applicant and their engineer shall explore alternate EOF to reduce pooling depth and area. 2. A soils report indicating soil conditions, permeability and slope is required. 3. The scale on the grading plans must be corrected. 4. The existing and proposed elevations must be shown at the corners of the proposed structure. Chanhassen Planning Commission —May 20, 2014 5. The plan shall be revised to show locations of proposed stockpile areas. 6. The proposed grades shall be no steeper than 3:1. 7. Staff recommends the use of minimum parking dimensions to reduce hard surface cover and aid in the stormwater management of the property per City Code §20 -1118. 8. The erosion prevention and sediment control plan must be compliant with Chapter 19 of Chanhassen City Code. 9. The applicant must procure and comply with all required approvals from applicable jurisdictional agencies. 10. The rip rap slope must be shown on the plans and erosion prevention and sediment control practices shall be modified to accommodate this disturbance. Buildine Official Conditions 1. The building addition is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system. 2. All plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 3. Detailed occupancy and building area- related code requirements cannot be reviewed until further information is provided. 4. The owner and/or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. Planning Conditions 1. All rooftop and ground equipment must be screened from views. 2. Any new signs must comply with the sign ordinance requirements. 3. Light levels for site lighting shall be no more than one -half foot candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. Light fixtures shall be downcast and the light shall be cut off at a 90- degree angle as required by the city code. All fixtures shall be shielded. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0.