Admin Section ADMINISTRATIVE SECTION
' Development Approval Schedule for the Medical Arts Building
Project from Fred Hoisington dated January 13 , 1989 .
Memo to Southwest Coalition of Communities dated January 6 , 1989
' and Memo from Don Ashworth dated December 12 , 1988 .
Memo to Housing and Redevelopment Authority dated January 3 ,
1 1989 .
Letter to Horizons , Inc. dated January 18, 1989 .
' Letter from Minnehaha Creek Watershed District dated January 3 ,
1989 .
' HRA Accounts Payable.
Public Safety Department Meeting Minutes from January 9 and 16 ,
1 1989 .
Letter to Cheryl Bergmann dated January 10 , 1989 .
Letter to Centex Real Estate Corporation dated January 10 , 1989 .
Memo from Scott Harr dated December 28 , 1988 .
Memo to Mark Littfin dated December 28 , 1988 .
Summary of Area Bond Sales .
Letter to Dick Potts dated December 22 , 1988 .
' Site Meeting Minutes for City Hall/Fire Station Construction
dated December 23 , 1988 .
' Letter to Property Owners re: TH 101 Realignment Informational
Meeting dated January 9 , 1989 .
Memo to Jim Chaffee dated January 9 , 1989 .
Let = to the Soo Line Railroad dated January 9 , 1989 .
' Letter to Brian Tichy dated January 5 , 1989 .
Letter from Roger Knutson dated January 17 , 1989 .
Letter from M.A. Gedney Company received January 19 , 1989 .
Letter from Roger Knutson dated January 10 , 1989 .
' Letter to Walter Boorsma dated January 11 , 1989 .
.
i .. ,
O 1!"r ,. r:i ' Hoisington Group Inc. // 3/4
1- i!..::';H .1!:110 .4.1-:' : ...i;:::,':.;: .,.-
. , -,.m..1:!- I_ c....- a6,. ._ -
•i,,,,K,::Land Use Consultants , ,...,.1:1-:, ,' ' , , • ,
. . ,
, , I
in - • 1-0*
, 1 ,
IT44,M:,[ittilit PHASE I 7.:MEDICAL ARTS BUILDING APPROVALS/ i,H :-,,,- ,..1 ; r'-' ■'''.''.'''''''ll''
VIrli,iirtikiV,, Fl.._
,'.1 '''..
•rei'44.4''.,= 5:ii.'iDEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE ,,,--rii' ,,,;•':' :, .,,, .,,,, .- , . ,-'- , ,,, ..1.,,-;;;;;;;,-..;,, :,,,i.,...J,,NI.:,..V:ri
1 .ipl,,,,',Ati,A4tki...4■14'4''f ,1':I - 11,. .--' - - - ,. ' ,I,--'''''; ,1,,!:!!!';:i..,:,0;;,:,,L,i',,-,1 ;; 1:.1,1!'. ,.; , ! :111:,_,,-.1-.- .• .,,.- „,:: , 1-.I:
:1,-'41,th,10-,'„,44.1:40153M4r.1119,11:Iti"O;P-1141!il;H14 , ,,,,:':V'''-r- 11,I!,,;',:ii'-''''-'',! '''-';'!'!;-'''1 ';hi:1 il,,' 1.•!:!"; f;t'1!°,-;,1, 1 ,,. ,,',.r-.'.1';,' 4 .,•(■.)'- :' .4-1;T',N,''4,4,4,,4,',4:4',,,,4 :4--'4,':A,114;1411.44'404',
iiiii'Ai,y,01-;:ljr,o.,4,4.,.-11,..p1 ,-,41,,,fiol..l , .-.;f4 1.• '?Wi';:!,'It!.1. '1''.ii`t ' ';.I'i;■1:i::'q.!.4'!il.'.■..''I'11
CITY OF CHANHASSEN 11.0.1. fligig,`,,,,Aiii.NPil.q■-464;M:04,-'!0':104410-ilfOttilf414111101110404
1114,!;!!!j::—.!■1 kl ' '': ' , : ,• ' • .
' 1-13-89
. .,..;
-----11;i;:0;,. 0;hillii44#0,,,IIII,;111117.if'.!1;,:i•loy,'il;4',k--i- ' 1 - ' ' ' -,! ,;ii;,"-,!,,,,-,, .:-., y..,.:,,,v ,:.;,;.il,,I,;;„,;;,:. ;,;.,.: 4,.,.:,i-!.,,-. ;
I ; . .
llii AN 6
iti , ;.,..401,1401,11,11110i.1:1■41.A,i,Ri.,,,„,lfoli14i:i.t..,4,1,11.01.i,,,iii,,„ CHADDA TO RESOLVE FINANCING,PROVIDE :.,,:,iiiior,
,,...1,11y,-,44,.,,,,•;,;,,,;,,,impm.•;.k,,I;;,:,±,,il;;A:t:;',:;:4,,,,,-iii,I;1441• . I,Ii,I,.' ••",'; EASEMENT, PREPARE BUILDING PLANS/SPECS .t'o'''-;',,i'
igirA14,,,„;:„;,;;;; ;t:1,11-d:4„:1i;;;;;;!;,.;3ii44:: :,I!.;;i:ifi..:iale::,:.,-;'4:41.1i,i,!•41;ih, rl- ;:, .; ;; .. •. „. . • ,.„..,„;.;•..... ., :-;::,...,:...-,-,,. .• ;:li... , 4 _ ; •. .,•;,,,'IL'ilit'
, 00 ,i;:plif'.1.11';;;; - r;:iii:';',i,t:::;, •toi'MP.1;lin:,,v,G,::-,,,,,,;,1,,,-(141,il,„.! - •,,,,, , ;:i. , , ,„-:,.. - :, „1.;;;;,. .,,,,,,,"41;,11];T..1,47,;:if 16!:1;1,:,..-tif p,,.;,4r,:,,j'letwirrii,x,:t4iii,..1;
f,•,:...,:-:,, '•',,2 JAN ,6'_'-43 11:,:rk4-:::.t'1' , .Q1-i' " .' : . , • -I‘ , ' ,, t 1;;,;.
PREPARATION OF REDEV AGREEMENT .„. .•. ;; , •;'•;;I • ; -' -
..,. .
I . , ' , •IIII:-III•;•11,I,!11-41!I:!ii4.,,,,I.:, ..• :,--- , i ,,•, . ._ :.■41 .i,.;„ .f.,,,,,, ,. ' . 1,
, : '.. ', ';: ' f;i191 .;.::,"1.,,j!i:-.';,,, r11 ..!-.4.1,2';1,!:1.1:':::,'
. 'i'"!-% I 1!1=1:1:1;;...•;1,1,-.11 '' 1;..4.!4 1," .
,
' ''''' '''"'"il'!'JAN 10 --FEB 1 ,
PREPARATION OF PROPERTY SURVEY AND SITE
;.1,,,••;:i •,.„:;i:iil,;ii;11**'.,;;;i;taif,..i;i 4 ,'1'''i '- PLAN (CITY) .,,,,,,IIII!.;1,,--1.;1...;,:r.,,.1,;;IkiI,0,;.:t„.;„6 ,144,1•40;„.„iir;:„;„,,,4-;i;11;-;1;jii„,',j,:.■ii 1:;
II -401,,,'U-1,;;$11,40111141401111111,4:1f,-!:r4;1■; 'I.''' ,
,- ,1!-.li:-I i ,1 1,1 1',Irt.1,!,:',-,,n,;.;!?-.11114`M.1-d !, '' 0..! J1 0.,ill(I'
''' ' ':-;!;1!',1',''°V,H;'';'' ',,!1,113. ';;: , .,, i ;,1,, .'',,1:!1;, ,.:;, „
. ,.;v,j:OM,' II,I1,;'!P .t1;;,,,411::,,i, - ,
' ' 1;'''' r:4411;801;:lil"'!1,104;-!,-- 11: ,'' ' '!,:14
„, ,,-;:if?,'..
;"'iij '1'1:HIAN' 19 ' I, '''' ' HRA REVIEW/APPROVAL OF REDEV AGREEMENT. '' '
AN 23 r
I
, „ , ,,,•;. :;„;;;. .,., .•
CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZES UPDATING OF
FEASIBILITY STUDY Ii..i. ;;•: ' .: .
; , ; ,-, :, ; !. .1 :,,,_;,!,• -- .._ • ,,, , , . , ,
,
I ' JAN 27 PREPARE PUBLIC HEARING AD •
RE: HRA HEARING ON LAND SALE ,
I
FEB 2 , PUBLISH NOTICE FOR HRA LAND SALE HEARING
.,-
..,. ., ; • •
. ,
13
CITY COUNCIL SETS 429 PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR .:
....„„:„.___„-, •,,,,,. ;
MAR 13
. . .,,.. ...
- 4
4
' 'N,;,ii:7 ,,,.-,4:1,-',,_,,i .,,,:...,
-,...,4"
,
.-,,,,,;4;.::0 ..,,--1•rEB 15 ,. ---,•,, PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN; •
; ..;
ii...-4;;;.;,.: ,•;:, ;;.,-1.-,;•,,.:.;; , , ,
REVIEW OF LAND SALE RE: COMPREHENSIVE.,PLAN,,,p,,,i4,,,,i.-ii,..1
,...;;,.;;;,;:-,..,• 1; ;:-• ; ; • •
i7:,],fallog1-4-.11!'''ir,:ifi:;:1.j;,1,!.;!,.1-:i:',411:4!;!,',-,,i1,i;1:,..i;ii,- ,.; ,, ';',..,' '
,-.-'4:1;;;,1;.i-;;!'11 -IL'-;',',117:14ii;r!'t' 1'•,!'ii;4'1,,,J,''''
11.-,::F::.; I_,1;., v:.:';.,.,,::i.
,,,, ,. : COMPLIANCE • .„
... .,,,;.,,.•,.,,,.,1;;,..,10F,•; ..,!' ,- , ;;;!...4:: •
• '
' FEB 16 - ' . HRA REVIEW/APPROVAL OF REDEV AGREEMENT/
. .
,
PURCHASE AGREEMENT; PUBLIC HEARING ON LAND -••
„_ , _ . ,
- •- --,- -- -•-.,•
,v. : --;;;•,,,,,yr,;.,„a,: ,,,, SALE
,,..„ .„,,,.,,,,,,„ ..•_1„7,..,T.t-,•%,,t t Ay%
•4V.I.:Pi',1414Atilf-ggiir-tili t'.;.-,•• • , ., I , I
.. '. •. . . -.• — -' . I I'.et,,•I I'.i',t ji,It-., -..e I.;,..:j.II:1;•44•4 ''.1 inti
,, ., I--,. ... i • II ..., 1 r
IlVir0-?1°--.;k ''''.• ;';'. '''' ''!' ',i _, , „ „
,
,.' .- -' FEB 17 ,
,- , ---;•;;;, PREPARE EROSION CONTROL PLAN- APPLY FOR .,''.;•`.:;11:1!:P:..,0:,;„'::'.
„, . ;.-...„,-• ,
•,::; •;• •-•-.!,4,-,,,,,1„';:- _. ..,
WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT ...,.. ., . ; ..;•;.:;!..A0P+4.:4,17rr,:i..
, •
,..- ,,-, ., •
; FEB 20 - 23
I
,,,„,,.,,,•,;0-: ,- - ., ,
.. ,,
. . .
,,;;;;;;;;.;•..,,,,,, 4. , , *
PREPARE 429 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE A. -1•'1''-'4-''''V' t'''''
. •- ••;-;•-•.1-;•,-,:;-- g•,:-'
- - - --'
' 1 '1' kiiCh i k..."0
.. ,
7300 Metro Blvd.
•
,_ ,
Suite 525 JAN 1 7 1989
,
Edina,MN 55435
.. 1• -
(612)835-9960 ....,,f14V.:',,,: .,- ,- 1 •::,•4 :,,,i;
,
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
,.
''''• ,,_ ._ •
.-„.„ -A.---"';,-4-'1'7Va%/W,';,141;;.t:i.i:.:;:4-., -, -,.T,-;:,:a r-;'.
I "
I
FEB 23 PUBLICATION OF 429 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
1 , FEB 27
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN/
:: , ACCEPTANCE OF FEASIBILITY STUDY
MAR 1 - 15 PREPARE/SUBMIT PRELIMINARY PLAT (CITY)
1 MAR 1 WATERSHED DISTRICT MEETING
;',,,
I MAR 2 , i., ,, MAIL 429 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICES
MAR 8 PUBLIC INFORMATION/LANDOWNERS MEETING
RE: FEASIBILITY STUDY
MAR 13 CITY COUNCIL 429 PUBLIC HEARING/AUTHORIZE
I PARKING PLANS/SPECS; APPROVAL OF GRADING/
FOUNDATION PERMIT
I MAR 13 - MAY 8 - PREPARE PARKING LOT PLANS/SPECS (CITY)
I MAR 15 BREAK GROUND FOR FOOTINGS/FOUNDATIONS
I
MAR 15 COMPLETION OF BUILDING PLANS/SPECS
MAR 16 - APR 6 CITY BUILDING DEPT REVIEW OF BUILDING PLANS/
SPECS; BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE
MAR 17 PREPARE PRELIMINARY PLAT HEARING NOTICES
liri,AN:ii,,. . _ .
MAR 23 PUBLISH/MAIL PUBLIC HEARING NOTICES ON
PRELIMINARY PLAT
' I APR 5
PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING ON
' . PRELIMINARY PLAT ,
' APR 10 COMMENCE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
i
APR 24 CITY COUNCIL CALL FOR 429 BOND SALE
o: , -
I 2
_ , , r
I. ,
I
1
MAY 8 CITY COUNCIL ACCEPTANCE OF PLANS/SPECS;
i,. AUTHORIZE ADVERTISING FOR BIDS;
APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT '
_ ADVERTISE FOR BOND SALE
MAY 9 31
(OPTIONAL - COORDINATION WITH
HIGHWAY 101 REALIGNMENT) 1
+� ,,z31,,,MAY 9 - JUN 9 PREPARE DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT
MAY 10 BEGIN ADVERTISING FOR PARKING LOT BIDS
•
JUN 2 BID OPENING (PARKING) 1
JUN 12 ■ CITY COUNCIL AWARD OF CONTRACT
JUL 1 COMMENCE PARKING LOT GRADING
AUG 15 COMPLETE PARKING LOT CONSTRUCTION 1
SEP 1 BUILDING OCCUPANCY;PARKING LOT
LANDSCAPING AND FINAL PROJECT COMPLETION
OCT 1989 GRAND OPENING 1
•
i
1
3 '` 1
CITYOF
I .,,
,,.
\ ,it,.. CHANHASSEN
j
1
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
I
IMEMORANDUM INVOICE
TO: Southwest Coalition of Communities
1 FROM: Stephen Hanson, Planning Directo
DATE: January 6 , 1989
ISUBJ: 1988 John Boland Contract
I have reviewed records for payment on the above referenced
contract for 1988. The invoice for the 1987 contract established
the percentages for each agency. At the bottom of the invoice it
was noted that the same percentages would be utilized for the
1 1988 contract of $12, 000 ( $1, 000/mo) for lobbying work on the
Transportation and Sewer Policy Plans .
1 Based on these percentages , the account due for each agency is
as follows :
II Agency Percentage Total Due
Chanhassen 17 .55 $2 ,106 . 00
Eden Prairie 17 .55 2 ,106 . 00
I Shakopee 17.55 2 ,106 . 00
Carver County 17 .55 2 ,106 . 00
Victoria 10 .55 1 , 266 . 00
I Waconia 10 .55 1 , 266 . 00
Minnetrista 4 . 35 522 . 00
Shorewood (dropped out 4 . 35 522 . 00
for 1988)
I
100% $12 ,000 .00
II would suggest that we discuss allocation of financial respon-
sibility for 1989 at our next meeting.
1 Please consider this memo as an invoice for the amount due for
the year 1988 .
I
I
I
I , ix:
.:.:. CITY OF
1 �1j. . CHANHASSEN'
1
,...,:,,Q,,,,„
--
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
II MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
IIFROM: Don Ashworth, City Manager
IDATE: December 12, 1988
SUBJ: Joint Powers Agreement, Southwest Communities Coalition
IThe attached contract between Carver County and the City of
Chanhassen is similar to that entered into for 1988 . A new
II contract is needed for 1989 . I believe the contract is self-
explanatory, i .e. communities in the southwest area have banded
together to employ Mr. Boland to lobby in our behalf. The pri-
I mary work has been in the area of the Metropolitan Council ' s
Development Framework Plan. Chanhassen acts as the lead agency
in that we direct the work of Mr. Boland and seek reimbursement
of member cities for such billed work. The joint powers
I agreement formalizes the process with Carver County in that it
recognizes that Carver County must reimburse Chanhassen for the
work we bill them for. Most of the other jurisdictions within
I the southwest area do not require the same level of formalization-
and most are bound solely on the basis of a letter from the chief
administrative officer stating their intent to belong and to pay
costs.
IIApproval of the attached joint powers agreement for the Southwest
Communities Coalition lobbying efforts is recommended.
II
ch,_`
cpb
I r4v),_,
I
I
II ,
e I - CITY OF
...,_
II \ . .
, :,,' -
I \;,...‘Li - CHANHASSEN
" 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
MEMORANDUM
1 TO: Housing and Redevelopment Authority
FROM: Don Ashworth, City Manager
IIDATE: January 3 , 1989
1 SUBJ: Loren Anderson Option/Purchase Agreement
I During the course of the past two years the HRA has seen innu-
merable versions of purchase agreements between Loren Anderson
(Automotive Unlimited) and the HRA. In fact, we have a signed
purchase agreement with Mr. Anderson which dates back approxima-
I tely six to nine months ago. If the HRA will recall, it was the
opinion of the City Attorney not to have the HRA execute that
document as such would potentially bind the HRA to rectify pollu-
Ition problems on the property.
The attached copy of the purchase agreement is materially same as
seen by the HRA nine months ago. The only difference is that
Isuch is accompanied by an "option agreement" which provides to us
the option of whether we wish to execute the purchase agreement
in the future. If we would fail to exercise that option, monies
I paid as a part of the option agreement would be lost. The City -
Attorney has verified that by entering into the option agreement
the City is not binding itself to payment of pollution correc-
ttions .
As the attached documents are the same as have been previously
approved by the HRA, this office will have the Chairman and
1 myself execute the option agreement during the early part of this
next week. The purchase agreement will be kept on file until
such date as the PCA has agreed to a remedial action plan for the
I property. I will place both of these items on to the January
19th agenda to confirm that this office has acted properly in
having the Chairman and myself execute the option agreement. As
II a side note, the City Attorney has continued to work with PCA in an
effort to seek their agreement to a remedial action plan. An
initial plan (copy attached) was submitted to PCA approximately
two weeks ago. The PCA appears to be willing to agree to the
I remedial action plan dependent upon receiving information on two
or three items that they did not feel were properly addressed in
the Dahl report. Again, the City Attorney is working with PCA
I
1
Housing and Redevelopment Authority
January 3 , 1989
Page 2
and Dahl and Associates to obtain these final pieces of infor-
mation. Once the plan has been approved by PCA, Mr. Anderson
would be permitted to seek reimbursement of his costs in pre-
paring
the remedial action plan as well as costs associated with
site clean up. Please note that the option agreement calls for
the payment to Mr. Anderson to be in the name of both Anderson
and Dahl and Associates - thus assuring that the monies will be
used for clean-up purposes .
Dr)
1
I
I
I CITYOF
1 :.
, CHANHASSEN
1 -, _''" 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
1 (612) 937-1900
January 18, 1989
I
1 Horizons, Inc.
Aerial Surveys & Digital Photogrammetry
Opus 2 - 6125 Blue Circle Drive
IIMinnetonka, MN 55343
Re: Aerial Photographic Service Proposal
1 File No. PW125
Gentlemen:
1 The City of Chanhassen is proposing to purchase aerial photo-
graphs of the City and orthophoto maps showing contours at 2-foot
intervals of the areas outlined on the attached map. If
I interested, please submit your quote on the enclosed proposal by
February 8 , 1989 .
1 Your services shall cover the following points:
1 . Your mapping program will consist of a network of basic hori-
zontal control and office aerotriangulation that will assure =
that all future mapping in Chanhassen can be on the same
horizontal datum (Minnesota state plane coordinate system or
County coordinate system) .
I2 . You will utilize the spring, 1989 aerial photography suitable
for preparation of one-half section enlargements and for the
1 2-foot contour mapping.
3 . You will provide orthophoto maps at a scale of 1" = 200 ' ,
showing contours at two-foot intervals .
1 4 . The orthophoto image will show all the visible physical
features such as roads , railroads, fences , buildings ,
1 drainage courses, shorelines, swamps and trees that are
visible on the photography.
1 5 . Delivery will be in the form of reproducible positives on
stable base material (matt finish - 4 mil mylar) .
1
1
I
Aerial Photographic Service Proposal
January 18 , 1989 U
Page 2
6. The contours, elevations and geographic annotations will be '
prepared by scribing technique and combined with the
orthophoto. The orthophoto image will be screened and the
line work will be shown with solid white lines.
7 . Sheets showing the contours shall be laid out to cover one-
half sections with a small overlap between sheets. I
8. The City shall have the exclusive right to the ownership and
use of the negatives, photographs and maps to be furnished 11 the City pursuant to this contract. The City shall have the
exclusive right to apply for copyright protection. The
contractor shall not reproduce, sell , or make copies for its
own use of the negatives, photographs and maps except as spe-
cifically provided in this contract.
9 . The City reserves the right to reject any or all bids and to
accept any part of a bid most advantageous to the City.
If you should have any questions, please call.
Sincerely,
CITY OF CHANHASSEN I
Gary G. Warren, P.E. I
City Engineer
GGW:ktm 1
Attachments: 1. Proposal
2 . Maps '
I
I
PROPOSAL
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICE
FOR THE
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
DATE: 1989
' Gentlemen:
The undersigned, , proposes and
' agrees to furnish all labor, material , equipment and supplies
necessary for aerial photographic service for the City of
Chanhassen, Minnesota, in accordance with the preceding letter
' prepared by the City of Chanhassen for the following prices:
A. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
' Complete City of Chanhassen 1" = 200 ' scale
reproducible one-half section enlargements
Complete Lump Sum Price $
B. ORTHOPHOTO MAPPING
Orthophoto maps at a scale of 1" = 200 '
showing contours at two-foot intervals
(as shown on map)
Complete Lump Sum Price $
' C. GROUND CONTROL FOR MAPPING
Lump Sum Price for Ground Control $
' TOTAL PROJECT COST $
Ground control deduction if the City
of Chanhassen were to furnish the
necessary control for mapping $
' Company Name
Signature
Its
1
1
I
a-.
a '
?Horizons , Inc.
Aerial Surveys & Digital Photogrammetry
Opus 2 - 6125 Blue Circle Drive
Minnetonka, MN 55343? '
?Martinez Corporation 11 240 Fillmore Avenue East
St. Paul, MN 55107?
a '?Mark Hurd Aerial Surveys , Inc.
345 Pennsylvania Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55426? ,
a
VAero Metric Engineering, Inc.
4708 North 40th Street
Sheboygan, WI 53081-0449?
I
1
1
1
•��{AHA CzFF WATERSHED BOUNDARY
G
A
S/fED Dec' OP' 4..- y o4'
MINNEHAHA CREEK
ILAKE MINNETONKA
WATERSHED DISTRICT
P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 MINNESOTA RIVER
IBOARD OF MANAGERS: Camille D.Andre,Pres. • Albert L.Lehman • John E.Thomas
James R.Spensley • Richard R.Miller • Robert D.Erickson • C.Woodrow Love
I L1 G. A A,wt 1 A_.. PA'CY— ,r
143/
IIJanuary 3, 1989
r
Mr. Gary Warren , City Engineer
II City of Chanhassen
690 Coulter Drive
Chanhassen, MN 55317
II Re: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
1989 Water Maintenance and Repair Fund
1 Dear Mr. Warren:
Due to budget limitations , the Board of Managers of the Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District will not review proposals from municipalities for cost-
Ishare monies from the Water Maintenance and Repair Fund in 1989 .
If you have any questions , please contact me at 473-4224.
1 Very truly yours ,
JMM/EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES
IIEngineers for the Di trict
.)2el-rti a
1 Kevin C. Larson , Engineer
11 btA4^ r+4 ,7`f;:+ P,:.? i('iNr�_7 r� q
iii ` ,. tft(
cc: Board
: �� . =?i:�,.,
Smith h, -' . I��,'�
IL. , OA +.vJ
,i,il 11 :i
•J J.
I .
1
011 - r - ■■r NM M M M - - 1 N M MN MN a - •
CHANHASSEN H.R.A. A C C O U N T S P A Y A B L E 01-23-89 PAGE 1
�,. 1988 EXPENSES
CHECK # A M O U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P O S E
J
037055 1.628.97 BRW, INC. FEES. SERVICE
037056 2,137.50 BLOOMBERG COMPANIES, INC LAND—PURCHASE + IMP
nw 037057 10.585.20 FELL TRUCKING AND AWARDED CONST CONTRACTS
037058 120.00 HOISINGTON GROUP. INC. FEES. SERVICE
037059 2,500.00 KILLMER ELECTRIC CO. ,INC REP. + MAINT. ,BLDG + GND —�
k. 037060 1,979.28 LEFEVERE,LEFLER,KENNEDY FEES, SERVICE
037061 30.00 MERICOR FINANCIAL SVCS. FEES, SERVICE
037062 885.00 VON KLUG & ASSOC. , INC. FEES, SERVICE
8 19.865.95 CHECKS WRITTEN
J
0
0
1r .a
to
4
•
/- .3 '%
PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT MINUTES
JANUARY 9 , 1989
1 PRESENT: Jim Chaffee
Scott Harr ABSENT: Bob Zydowsky
Dale Gregory
Mark Littfin
' Carl Barke
Steve Kirchman
Larry Brown
Ron Julkowski
Steve Hanson
Deb Rand
OLD BUSINESS
Lakeview Hills Apartments: Our close scrutiny of the Lakeview
' Hills Apartment complex roof reconstruction is paying off. We
continue to monitor the progress and everything appears to be
moving along smoothly.
Rosemount Engineering: Ron stated that Rosemount has received a
foundation permit and he believes they have paid for the SAC
charge in 1988, resulting in substantial savings .
Handicapped Sign/Town Square: The handicapped sign is once again
in place which hopefully will lay to rest a persistent problem.
Sprinkler Systems: Mark Littfin clarified what the West Metro
Fire Marshal' s Association is introducing to the State
Legislature about licensing sprinkler companies . He indicated
that they will be wrapping up the legislation on this issue hope-
fully by Tuesday of this week. Mark also indicated that the pro-
cess whereby a permit to install a fire alarm is being looked at.
This will be done through local requirements .
' HSZ Site: Larry Brown indicated that the fire hydrant at the
corner of West 64th Street and TH 41 is inoperative. Mark
Littfin asked that the engineering department cover it with a
plastic bag or somehow secure it to indicate that it is not
operable.
Certificates of Occupancy, Town Square: Apparently all of the
problems have been worked out with Town Square regarding
certificates of occupancies . This would include the plumbing
problems that were previously experienced at Olson' s bakery.
NEW BUSINESS
Westside Baptist Church: This was the big topic of the meeting
and centered around the lack of a certificate of occupancy for
Westside Baptist. It was pointed out during the meeting that on
December 12, 1988 , Pastor Pike of Westside Baptist presented a
problem to the City Council concerning moving his church into the
industrial office park area. The City Council granted a 90 day
temporary conditional use permit for Pastor Pike to move his
Public Safety Department Meeting
January 9, 1989 1
Page 2
church to that area. On December 19, 1988 , I sent a letter to
Pastor Pike indicating that the City Council had not granted a
certificate of occupancy and he was not to occupy the premises
until all code requirements were met. Steve Kirchman indicated
that they in fact moved in on December 22, 1988 . Steve had found
this information out from Carl at Fitness Master who had given
the Westside people a key to get in. Numerous issues were
discussed concerning Westside Baptist and options to remedy some
of the issues . A suggestion was made that members of the Public
Safety Department help Pastor Pike on their own time on a Saturday
to bring the building up to code. This was discussed in length
and the final outcome was that it was probably not a good idea
for the following reasons : 1 ) liability issues and 2) we were
not sure exactly what we would be saving Pastor Pike since he is
purchasing all the material and doing all the work himself
anyway. The final concensus was that Pastor Pike is no different
than anyone else in the City and must abide by the state law.
Whatever the intent of the City Council was , they cannot nor can
anybody, permit anybody to break state law. A continued dialogue
will be kept open between public safety and Pastor Pike in
working toward an agreeable solution. A recent memo from Scott
Harr to Jim Chaffee requested that I seek support of the City
Council in authorizing us to enforce all applicable codes to this
property and to not permit occupancy until the necesssary correc-
tions are made and inspection completed. This statement was
discussed and some felt it necessary not to seek City Council
approval to enforce the law since that is what we were employed
to do in the first place. The final concensus was that Pastor
Pike and Westside Baptist had to abide by state law and could not
occupy the premises until such time as they receive a certificate-: '
of occupancy.
Positive Strokes , 1989: Scott Harr went over his recommendation
to make 1989 a positive year. The last year, 1988, seemed to
dwell on the negatives and consequently we are making a pledge to
make 1989 a very positive and enjoyable year for everyone we come
in contact with. Numerous ways were discussed in which this can
be done, i .e. recognition for jobs on a regular basis, on a quar-
terly basis, etc. This would include all aspects of the Public
Safety Department, Public Safety Commission, Deputies, and the
Fire Department.
I/
Inspections When No One Home: Carl Barke brought up the problem
of being called to an inspection, arriving, and no one is home.
He states that a few times in the past, people have called for
inspection indicating that they will leave the door open. Carl
was interested to know the City' s policy on doing an inspection '
when no one was home. As can be expected, Crime Prevention
Officer Deb Rand took exception to anyone leaving their house
open for any kind of inspection. Options were discussed whereby
the homeowner could hide a key on the premises or drop a key off ,
Public Safety Department Meeting
January 9, 1989
Page 3
at City Hall. Since no general concensus could be found, Scott
Harr was directed to look into the matter and find out liability
concerns for the City. Scott will then direct a memo to Jim and
he will come up with a policy concerning this problem.
Seminary: The seminary is continuing to be monitored by Scott
' Harr. The checks of the old barrels have shown them to be full
of old paint sludge and they are in the process of breaking up
old pipes in the basement of the house to be burned.
Street Signs/House Numbers: Mark Littfin brought up a concern
that the Fire Department has concerning street signs in the new
' developments , or to be exact, the lack of street signs . The
question was "Can street signs be placed in the middle of the
winter?" and according to Jerry Schlenk they can. He also asked
the status of house number campaign. Scott Harr indicated that
to date he has received no complaints or advisories on buildings
lacking house numbers .
' 1989 Goals: I have received all of the 1989 goals per my request
and I will be meeting with each member of the Public Safety
Department to discuss these goals .
Martin Luther King Day: Monday, January 16th will be Martin
Luther King Day. City Hall not officially be open; however,
everyone is scheduled to work. The doors will be locked, the
11 phones will be off, and it will be used generally as a clean-up
office and paperwork day.
' Next Meeting: The next meeting will be on Martin Luther King
Day, January 16 , 1989 at 8 : 30 a.m. Happy Martin Luther King, Jr.
Day!
I
Jim Chatfee
Public Safety Director
11
I
I
I
' MINUTES
PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT MEETING
JANUARY 16 , 1989
' Present: Jim Chaffee
Scott Harr Steve Kirchman
Larry Brown
Carl Barke Ron Julkowski
Deb Rand Mark Littfin
Absent: Dale Gregory
Bob Zydowsky
OLD BUSINESS
Sprinkler Systems: Mark Littfin will be getting me the infor-
mation on sprinkler systems , the fee structure, etc. by this
afternoon so that we may present it to the Council on January 23 ,
1989.
Westside Baptist Church: The discussion centered around the
requirements imposed upon the Westside Baptist Church at their
new location in the industrial park. We discussed whether the
building as it is used is considered an E3 or a B2 occupancy.
After discussing this question at some length we decided that we
would call it a B2 occupancy. The question mainly was regarding
the nursery that is set up to be used during church services .
Fire Inspector Mark Littfin stated that he had the information
' from the State that as long as the parents are dropping their
children off and remaining in the building not to exceed three
hours , it would be considered a nursery. It would not have to
meet the requirements . However, the remaining requirements to
meet life and safety and health code will have to be met. Ron
Julkowski tried to get in on Friday to see if the conditions laid
down had been met prior to their holding church services on
Sunday. When Ron arrived, the building was locked and he could
not gain entry. Jim Chaffee had received a call from Pastor Pike
on Friday stating that they had purchased the exit signs and they
were electrical; however, they did not have the battery backup
capability at this time. He said that they would have to
purchase the batteries and they would do so. He also stated that
11 they would have the panic hardware installed by Saturday after-
noon. At this writing, we do not know if the requirements have
been met. It was a concensus from the group that if by Friday
afternoon this week, January 20 , 1989, Westside Baptist is not up
to code, then we will seek a court injunction to prevent them
from holding services there.
NEW BUSINESS
' Snow Forts: Scott Harr suggested that we keep our eyes open for
snow forts close to the roadway. He had been receiving complaints
about kids sliding and playing in the snow forts real close to
the roadway making it hazardous for themselves and for drivers .
MINUTES ,
PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT MEETING
JANUARY 16 , 1989
Page 2
Crime Prevention Film: Scott Harr stated that he had purchased a
$9 .50 crime prevention film over the weekend and that it should
be coming in the mail shortly. The price of $9 .50 was well worth
the amount of information contained on the film.
Dinner Theatre: Scott Harr stated that the Dinner Theatre is now
using the fill that they had placed over our easements as a turn-
around. Scott and Larry will be looking into this .
New Addition: Jim Chaffee requested that all public safety per-
sonnel provide him with information by Friday for the furniture
needed to equip their new offices in the new addition. This
included bookshelves , bulletin boards, filing cabinets, staplers,
tape dispensers, chairs , etc.
Chan Vet: Deb Rand brought up the unpleasant concept of euthana-
sia. She stated that neither she nor the Chan Vet like to eutha-
nize dogs and cats and the discussion centered around placing an
article in the paper each time we end up impounding a dog or a
cat. This may necessitate extending the impound time from 5 days
to 7 days (business days) and might incur additional costs . Deb
will be working with Scott Harr on this issue.
Next Meeting: The next meeting will be on Monday, January 23 ,
1989.
I
I
I
i
1
1
1-4/-
Alex r G
II
SOUTHWEST METRO
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie,MN 55344
' (612)934-7928
January 10, 1989
' Ms. Cheryl Bergmann - M.S. 3713
The Pillsbury Company
200 South Sixth Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
' Dear Ms. Kissner:
•
I am writing to you on behalf of the Mayors of Eden Prairie,
Chanhassen, and Chaska to acknowledge your letter of December 15,
1 1988 concerning recent route and schedule changes on Southwest
Metro Express routes 53E and 53J and the provision for service
from the new Park/Ride lot at Shady Oak Road/#169.
' The Southwest Metro Transit Commission at its meeting on December
29, 1988, dicussed rider comments and concerns for transit
service received in response to this change. In as much as this
change was recently implemented, (December 12, 1988) the Transit
Commission directed the administrator to gather additional
information, such as the timing of this route, over the next
several weeks. This information will provide an opportunity for
Southwest Metro to gain operating experience so that we can
adequately address the issues and demand for service from this
' area.
The Transit Commission appreciates receiving feedback from the
riders, and will carefully review all of the issues before taking
any action. Thank you for your input.
Sincerely,
1 G
verl y 4T r
Y
Administrator
BM:p b
cc Mayor Peterson
Mayor Chmiel
Mayor Roepke
C JAN 13 1989
f. .
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
1
1 .
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
,„ -
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
<:4
(612) 937-1900
January 10 , 1989
1
Centex Real Estate Corporation
Attn: Mr. John Spiess
Vice President - Production
Baker Technology Plaza
5959 Baker Road
Suite 300
Minnetonka, MN 55345
' Re: Curry Farms Second Addition
File No. 88-5 (pvt)
Dear Mr. Spiess:
On December 27 , 1988 , the City received your letter concerning
1 requests for reductions of your outstanding letters of credit for
Curry Farms First and Second Additions. As you are aware, the
letter of credit for the First Addition was allowed to expire and
1 was picked up by you on January 6, 1989 .
Concerning the Second Addition, contrary to indications from your
consultant and yourselves, the improvements have not been
completed. I acknowledge the fact the second barricade installa
tion was postponed at my direction; however, other items such as
installation of the wear course and final restoration work
remains to be completed in the spring.
Concerning the installation of the second barricade, the City
1 transmitted to you title information in December which verified
that access easements remained in force for the existing property
owners who had utilized Teton Lane for access. It was because
these easements had not been released that the installation of
the final barricade on Teton Lane was postponed. As you are
aware, a condition of approval for the Curry Farms Second
Addition required the barricading of Teton Lane to prohibit traf-
fic from utilizing this as a through street.
It is therefore my position that until the access easements from
the existing property owners have been released and the second
1 barricade installed on Teton Lane that no reduction of the letter
of credit will be considered for the Second Addition. I trust you -
can appreciate the importance of resolving this in a timely fashion
and I would appreciate your immediate attention to this matter.
I
Mr. John Spiess
January 10 , 1989
Page 2
If you have any questions please call .
Sincerely,
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
4 Ati644,4.00—■
G. Warren, P.E.
C gineer
GGW:ktm
cc: Roger Knutson, City Attorney 1
Allan Larson, Sr. Engineering Technician
Larry Brown, Staff Engineer
Development Contract File
City Council Administrative Packet (1/23/89 )
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
•
1
1
1
11
1 Ake,- P pp
C ITY 0 F e"-/—.74,14- 4:(
CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
1
I
TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager
Jim Chaffee, Public Safety Director
FROM: Scott Harr, Asst. Public Safety Director (75/1/')v
DATE: December 28, 1988
SUBJ: Lowell Carlson Contractor' s Yard
This memo is to advise you of the status of my involvement with
Lowell Carlson ' s yard. Prior to Barbara Dacy' s leaving, she had
me go to the site with her, requesting assistance. The way that
she and I had left it was that she Gould get the file and write
me a memo stating what enforcement was necessary. I never heard
back from her.
Jim Chaffee advised me that he had received a question on this
and Ron Julkowski , Steve Hanson and I visited the site today.
Steve said that he would pick up the ball, with Ron assisting
providing the history on this , and as soon as they determine the .:
status , they would seek my involvement to provide any enforcement
action necessary.
' Please feel free to contact me if you have questions .
I
1
r
4d., s,„1-
I CITY OF c , A.,„,- p‘,._._4_
.,,
I , -.._,A .
\ . • CHANHASSEN
1 , L.‘, . 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
`- (612) 937-1900
IIMEMORANDUM
TO: Mark Littfin, Fire Inspector
IIFROM: Scott Harr, Asst. Public Safety Director
IDATE: December 28, 1988
SUBJ: A Commendation for Work Well Done!
II would like to take this opportunity to let you know that I con-
tinue Y
tinue to hear excellent things about the job that you are doing
II as Fire Inspector of the City of Chanhassen. I recently spoke
with Fire Chief Dale Gregory, who advised me that the Fire
Department as a whole believes that they are obtaining increasing
I amounts of beneficial information that has been a great benefit
to them.
I There is no doubt that you provide an excellent liaison between
Chanhassen Public Safety and the City Hall and the Chanhassen
Fire Department. Not only do I hear positive things from our own
Fire Department, but have heard a number of excellent comments
I regarding your work as Fire Inspector from neighboring com-
munities.
IYour excellent work is noted and commended. Good job!
cc: Dale Gregory ( e,,, '
Jim Chaffee
1 "'on Ashworth
I
I
I
I
I
r
ISUMMARY OF AREA BOND SALES C -c.. N`L,t'
'( Bond
Net Buyer
Municipality Date Type of Bonds Amount Maturity Rate Index Rating
I Iowa
Columbus Junction 10/11/88 G.O. Bonds $ BOOM 1989-2003 1.04% 1.53% NR
I Tama 10/17/88 Sewer Revenue Bonds 600M 1989-2003 1.08% 7.52% NR
West Union 10/24/88 G.O. Corporate Purpose Bonds 440M 1990-2001 6.93% 7.45% MR
Fairfield 10/24/88 G.O. Improvement Bonds 1,440M 1990-1999 6.63% 7.45% Al
Denison 11/01/88 G.O. Airport Improvement Bonds 100M 1989-1998 7.15% 1.36% A
I Denison 11/01/88 G.O. Corporate Bonds
11/14/88 G.O. Improvement Bonds 1,075M 1989-2004 6.82% 1.36% A
Johnston 1,350M 1990-2008 1.22% 1.44% A
Clarinda 11/15/88 Sewer Revenue Bonds 800M 1989-2004 1.29% 7.44% NR
Clarinda / 11/15/88 G.O. Improvement Bonds 1,000M 1989-2003 7.00% 7.44% NR
ISioux City 11/21/88 G.O. Improvement Bonds 2,200M 1991-2001 6.15% 1.50% Aa
Minnesota
I Brainerd
Edina 10/03/88 G.O. Improvement Bonds 315M 1991-2000 6.85% 1.64% A
2 10/03/88 G.O. Recreational Facility Bonds ,410M 1992-2009 7.26% 1.64% Aal/AA
Edina 10/03/88 G.O. Utility Revenue Bonds 3,160M 1990-1999 6.68% 7.64% Aal/AA
Edina 10/03/88 G.O. Taxable Tax Increment Bonds 5,100M 1995-2009. 9.60% 1.64% Aal/AA
I Edina 10/03/88 G.O. Tax Increment Bonds
10/03/88 G.O. Improvement Bonds 10,115M 1995-2009 1.26% 7.64% Aal/AA
Lino Lakes 2,090M 1990-1997 6.84% 1.62% Baal
Lino Lakes 10/03/88 G.O. Temporary Bonds 610M 1991 6.43% 7.62% Baal
St. Paul Park 10/03/88 G.O. Improvement Bonds 680M 1989-2000 6.89% 1.64% Baal
I Karlstad 10/04/88 G.O. Temporary Improvement Bonds 660M 1989 6.31% 1.45% NR
East Grand Forks 10/04/88 G.O. Improvement Bonds 125M 1990-2004 1.33% 7.64% Baal
Hennepin County 10/05/88 G.O. Improvement Bonds 20,500M 1989-2003 6.80% 1.64% Aaa/AAA
Bass Brook 10/11/88 G.O. Sewer Revenue Refunding Bonds 1,530M 1990-2000 7.01% 1.53% Baa
I Nicollet County 10/11/88 G.O. Drainage Bonds 195M 1989-1998 6.60% 1.53% A
Stewartville 10/11/88 G.O. Grant Anticipation Certs. 1,110M 1991 6.44% 7.53% NR
Lester Prairie 10/11/88 G.O. Improvement Bonds 450M 1989-1998 6.88% 1.53% NR
I.S.D. #716 10/11/88 G.O. Aid Anticipation Certificates 670M 1989 6.20% 1.52% NR
I (Belle Plaine)
Forest Lake 10/17/88 G.O. Improvement Bonds 310M 1991-2000 6.95% 1.52% Baal
Joint Powers Dist. #6011 10/17/88 G.O. School Building Bonds 3,925M 1990-2009 1.42% 1.52% Baa
(State of Minnesota)
I Burnsville 10/17/88 G.O. Improvement Bonds 4,650M 1990-2004 6.93% 1.52%' Al
Wilkin County 10/19/88 G.O. Capital Improvement Bonds 450M 1990-1999 6.11% 1.52% A
Wilkin County 10/19/88 G.O. Watershed Improvement Bonds 255M 1990-2004 1.01% 1.52% A
Minn. Higher Ed. Fac. 10/19/88 Mortgage Revenue Bonds 4,250M 1998 7.55% 1.52% NR
I I.S.D. #332 (Mora) 10/24/88 G.O. School Building Bonds
10/25/88 G.O. Tax Increment Bonds 390M 1993-1998 6.68% 1.45% A
Waite Park 4,500M 1991-2008 7.26% 1.45% Baa
Champlin 10/25/88 G.0, Improvement Bonds 1,510M 1990-2004 6.94% 1.45% Baal
Scott County 10/25/88 G.O. Improvement Bonds 8,500M 1989-2010 7.19% 1.45% Aaa/AAA
I Anoka County 10/25/88 G.O. Bridge Bonds 6,3001 1990-2009 7.16% 1.45% Al
Minneapolis Sp. S/D #1 10/25/88 G.O. School Building Bonds 5,150M 1991-2000 6.10% 1.45% Al
Browns Valley 10/26/88 G.O. Grant 8 Loan Antic. Bonds 1,125M 1991 6.46% 1.45% NR
I.S.D. #917 11/01/88 G.O. School Building Bonds 3,790M 1991-1996 6.34% 7.36% Al
I (Dakota County)
Robbinsdale 11/01/88 G.O. Tax Increment Bonds 2,250M 1991-2009 1.13% 7.36% A
Cottonwood 11/01/88 G.O. Taxable Tax Increment Bonds 80M 1991-1998 9.60% 7.36% NR
Isle 11/01/88 G.O. Grant 8 Loan Anticipation Bonds 665M 1991 6.38% 7.36% NR
I GEM Sanitary District 11/01/88 G.O. Grant 8 Loan Anticipation Bonds 860M 1991 6.39% 1.36% NR
(Stearns County)
West Concord 11/02/88 G.O. Storm Sewer Improvement Bonds 15M 1990-1999 7.16% 7.36% NR
Apple Valley 11/03/88 G.O. Refunding 8 Improvement Bonds 2,890M 1989-2005 6.54% 1.36% A
lc, ,4iii Plymouth 11/07/88 G.O. Taxable Tax Increment Bonds 1,050M 1992-1998 9.19% 7.33% Aa
Chanhassen 11/01/88 G.O. Tax Increment Bonds 140M 1989-2001 6.62% 7.33% Aaa/AAA
Chanhassen 11/07/88 G.O. Tax Increment Bonds 1,015M 1990-1997 6.64% 7.33% Aaa/AAA
Chanhassen
11/07/88 G.O. Improvement Bonds 4,185M 1990-2002 6.62% 7.33% Aaa/AAA
I Keewatin 11/09/88 G.O. Grant Anticipation Bonds
11/09/88 G.O. Improvement Bonds 990M 1991 6.57% 7.33% NR
Coon Rapids 5,000M 1990-2010 6.99% 7.33% Aaa
Fairmont 11/14/88 G.O. Improvement Bonds 395M 1990-2003 6.86% 1.44% Al
Fairmont 11/14/88 G.O. Sewer Revenue Bonds 750M 1990-2009 7.12% 7.44% Al
IMonticello 11/14/88 G.O. Water System Bonds 1,100M 1990-2004 6.99% 1.44% A
' 44_ s:J
CITYOF '
Aft. CHANHASSEN
„, y_.. 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
1 December 22 , 1988
' Mr. Dick Potts
6991 Tecumseh Lane
' Chanhassen, MN 55317
Dear Dick:
' From our conversation a few months ago at a City Council meeting,
I feel comfortable writing to you in regards to this matter. It
would appear that a new resident at 1551 Lyman Boulevard was con-
cerned about the snowmobile trail that traverses in front of
their property along the roadway. The resident indicated to me
that a few weeks ago while they were pulling out of their driveway
they almost collided with a snowmobile that was going extremely
fast along the trail and over their driveway. The resident thought
that this was a dangerous situation and has requested through my
office that we put stop signs up at her driveway so that the
snowmobilers would have to stop.
I would concur with her request and suggest that it probably
' would be nice to have stop signs there. Please keep in mind that
they are not complaining about the snowmobile trail, but from a
safety standpoint they would like to see stop signs up. I would
' appreciate any assistance that you can provide regarding this
matter. Please feel free to contact me if you have any
questions .
Sincerely,
61imChaff1
blic Safety Director
JC:v
cc: Don Ashworth, City Manager
' Mrs . Dorsey
I
I , ,
cc
1
1 J. NICHOLAS RUEHL,AIA
BERTIL E.HAGLUND,AIA
II
MEETING MINUTES
II
PROJECT: Chanhassen City Hall Addition
1 Chanhassen Fire Station Addition, Addition and Remodeling
Chanhassen, Minnesota
II DATE: December 23, 1988 EOS# 87126 & 87146
THOSE PRESENT: REPRESENTING:
IBud Augst Adolfson & Peterson
Jim Chaffee City of Chanhassen
1 Don Boeser
Jack Anderson O'Brien Sheet Metal
EOS Corporation
Dale Gregory Chanhassen Fire Station
Mark Littfin City of Chanhassen
1 Craig Courtney Olympic Fire Protection
Earl Moquist Adolfson & Peterson
Mary Fritz EOS Corporation
II
A. The following minutes reflect our understanding of the
g g
information discussed at the meeting. Please notify us if you
Ihave any questions or comments regarding these minutes .
1. Previous construction meeting minutes were reviewed and
1 the following items were noted:
a. Jack indicated that the mezzanine stair
miscellaneous metal shop drawings have been
II submitted and that Adolfson & Peterson should check
the status of the rest of the structural and
miscellaneous metal shop drawings, especially as it
1 affects the construction schedule.
b. Adolfson & Peterson will submit a revised schedule
I in bar graph form. Both projects are behind
construction schedule but should be back on schedule
by mid- February.
Ic . The sprinkler subcontractor has submitted his
options in letter form. Jack will send a copy of
his proposal to the mechanical engineer.
1
IEOS CORPORATION 470 Water Street, Excelsior, MN 55331 (612) 474-3291
;. ".ter' .._ 'l .a...
,,,1 - ,, 4. ! ,1,,,,„ ,,,,i
ry . . ��. ,. � �, af , .
il
ii
d. Roofing shop drawings have yet to be submitted. A II
pre-roofing conference should be scheduled on site
with each roofing contractor.
e. The first Change Order for both projects will be II
reviewed by the City Council at the January 9th
meeting. I
B. Regarding construction schedule and project items the
following is noted:
II
1. Fire Station
a. Masonry will start being laid up again next Tuesday. I
b. Joist pockets have been established.
c . Jim Chaffee indicated that it is not necessary to
II
produce a proposal request for a electrical line
connection between the Fire Station and City Hall .
d. Bud has been working with Jim McMahon of the II
Chanhassen Fire Department to coordinate phasing of
work which is to be done apparatus bay area and how I
this will affect the movement of trucks in and out
of that area.
e. Jack indicated that the revised condition at the
o
II
verhead doors which requires a angle brace needs to
be reviewed by the door sub contractor.
f. Jack will be meeting with the owner to go over the I
change orders for both the City Hall and the Fire
Station. II 2 . City Hall
a. The masonry is about 85% complete. The scaffolding
II
and poly enclosure will be dismantled next week and
Bud anticipates erection of steel will begin next
week also.
II
b. Bud indicated that the lower level slab should be
poured by Thursday of next week. It is also noted
that this will allow the mechanical contractor to
II
store materials at this level.
II
II
Y „) «er a A - >
c . The poured concrete slab sequence will be as
follows:
' a. First, the lower level slab
b. Second, the Court area.
c. Third, the topping over structural precast
floor.
d. The windows will be installed the first or second
Iweek of January.
e. Earl Moquist indicated that the rough estimate of
the trash enclosure and planter area at the City
Hall would be about 12-16 thousand dollars and would
like the Owner to review this rough estimate before
he proceeds with a final submittal .
C. The following items pertain to site visitation of 12-23-88 .
1 . Fire Station:
a. No additional comments .
' 2 . City Hall:
a. No additional comments .
PREPARED BY: .
Jack Anderson, AIA
JA:ko
cc: All participants
Gary Warren--City of Chanhassen
EXE Associates
Rudin Structures
M: \87126\doc\sm1223
I
1 CITY OF
1
. ANBAssEN
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
January 9, 1989
!
Re: Notice of Public Open House Meeting
Trunk Highway 101/Trunk Highway 5 Interchanges
File No. 88-22
Dear Property Owner:
! Since the City Council's approval of the Trunk Highway 101 realignment on
December 12, 1988, City staff and our consultants have been working to clarify
' the final intersection configurations for Trunk Highway 101/Trunk Highway 5
intersections at Dakota Avenue, Great Plains Boulevard and new Market Boulevard.
Significant progress has been made in this regard and a preliminary final layout
of these interchanges is ready for review prior to submittal to the City Council
at the January 23, 1989 meeting.
In order to provide all interested and affected parties, an opportunity to
' review these proposals prior to City Council review, an informal public open
house has been scheduled for January 19, 1989 between the hours of 4:00 p.m. and
7:00 p.m. at the City of Chanhassen City Hall Council Chambers located at 690
Coulter Drive.
You are cordially invited to attend this meeting where members of the City staff
and our consultants will be available to discuss details and answer questions
that you may have.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
LO
' G- ', .rren, P.E.
City •sneer
GGW:ktn
cc: City Council Administrative Packet (1/23/89)
' Gary Ehret, BRW
Fred Hoisington, Hoisington Group
Howard Preston, BRW -
Carl Hofstedt, MnDOT
Evan Green, MnDOT
CITYOF
� O C ANHAssEN
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
1
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jim Chaffee, Public Safety Director
FROM: Gary Warren, City Engineer
1 DATE: January 9, 1989
SUBJ: Laredo Drive/West 78th Street Accident Records
File No. PW070A-1
1 Jim, as we discussed today, 1/6/89 , we are in need of accident
records for the last five years for the Laredo Drive/West 78th
Street intersection in order for BRW to complete their warrant
1 review for the stop sign study at this intersection. I appre-
ciate your following up on this item and forwarding this infor-
mation directly to Howard Preston at BRW as soon as possible.
1 Howard indicated that he would be able to complete his evaluation
of this intersection within one week' s time of receipt of this
information. We are targeting to have this item on the February
1 13 , 1989 City Council agenda. Thank you for your assistance.
1 cc: Howard Preston, BRW
City Council Administrative Packet (1/23/89 )
1
1
i
1
1
1
I
CITY OF C ANBASSEN
1
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
}`> (612) 937-1900
January 9, 1989
Soo Line Railroad
Attn: Mr. Guy Short
Soo Line Building
' Box 530 _
Minneapolis, MN 55440
Re: Great Plains Boulevard and Market Boulevard Crossing Construction
File No. 86-11A-2
Dear Mr. Short:
I would like to document our Janaury 3, 1989 discussion. You
indicated to me at that time that Soo Line has programmed the
' construction work for the Great Plains Boulevard and Market
Boulevard crossings for the second quarter of 1989, i .e.
April-May-June. You also indicated that you would keep me
informed as to any refinements on the schedule recognizing the
importance of timely completion of this work to the City.
It is my understanding that your group handles the circuitry for
the signals and I would hope that when you state that your group
is planning on the second quarter of 1989 for construction that
this also means that the other departments such as the rubberized
' crossing personnel are also on this schedule. I would appreciate
being notified as we discussed of any changes in this schedule
and appreciate your cooperation in seeing to as early an imple-
mentation as possible.
Sincerely,
' CITY OF CHANHASSEN
� yV
Ga 4144 Warren, P.E.
Cit • ineer
GGW:ktm
cc: Gary Ehert, BRW
' Tom Parsons , Soo Line (Rubberized Crossings )
Ken Mahoney, Soo Line (Asst. Communications Engineer)
Frank Kraemer, Soo Line (Communications Engineer)
Loren Sultze, Soo Line (Public Contact Engineer)
City Council Administrative Packet (1/23/89 )
CITY OF
\
O. 1".
'
� . CHANHASSEN
\ 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
W2) 937-1900
January 5, 1989
1
1 Mr. Brian Tichy
1471 Lake Lucy Road
Excelsior, MN 55331
1 Dear Mr. Tichy:
1 I am writing in response to your inquiry with regard to parking a
motor vehicle within the designated "Bike Lane" along Lake Lucy
Road. I would like to thank you for your patience in waiting for
a response, as a detailed search of the applicable regulations
1 was necessary.
As you are aware from the information that was sent to you on
' May 3, 1988, the City Council passed a resolution which
designated the "No Parking" zone along Lake Lucy Road during the
July 14 , 1986 Council meeting. This resolution is in accordance
with Minnesota State Statute §160 . 263 , Subdivision 1 which states
1 "As used in this section, ' Bicycle Lane' means that portion of a
roadway set aside by the governing body of a political sub-
division having jurisdiction over the roadway for the exclusive
1 use of bicycles or other vehicles propelled by human power and so"
designated by appropriate signs and markings . . . "
This statute states that bicycle lanes have the exclusive use of
' the designated bicycle lane which requires the prohibition of
parking within this area.
1 In response to your additional question of the ability of a muni-
cipality to designate a two-way bicycle lane on one side of a
roadway, I quote the following Minnesota State Statute §169 . 222 ,
Subdivision 4 , Subsection A: "Every person operating a bicycle
upon a roadway shall ride as close as practicable to the right-
hand curb or edge of the roadway except under the following
situations :
1 . When overtaking and passing another vehicle proceeding in the
same direction.
2 . When preparing for a left turn at an intersection or into a
private road or driveway.
1
1
1
Mr. Brian Tichy
January 5 , 1989
Page 2
3 . When reasonably necessary to avoid conditions, including
fixed or moving objects, vehicles , pedestrians, animals , sur-
face hazards, or narrow width lanes, that make it safe to
continue along the right-hand curb or edge. " I
In short, this statute mandates that the bicycle lanes be
designated such that the flow of the bicycle lane corresponds
with the flow of motor vehicle traffic.
I am in receipt of the letter sent to you by Scott Harr,
Assistant Public Safety Director, which suggests that if incle-
ment weather makes it impossible for you to get up your driveway,
that you would call the Sheriff ' s Department at 448-2111 to
advise them so that your vehicles are not tagged or towed. 1
I hope this addresses the information that you needed.
Sincerely, '
aAA, 'LCwN_,
Larry Brown
Staff Engineer
LB:ktm
cc: City Council Administrative Packet 1
Don Ashworth, City Manager
Roger Knutson, City Attorney
Gary Warren, City Engineer
Jim Chaffee, Public Safety Director
Scott Harr , Asst. Public Safety Director
1
I
I
1
1
-I
LAW OFFICES
' GRANNIS, GRANNIS, FARRELL & KNUTSON
DAVID L. GRANNIS 1874-1961 PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION TELECOPIER:
DAVID L. GRANNIS,JR. - 1910-1980 POST OFFICE Box 57 (612)455-2359
VANCE B. GRANNIS 403 NORWEST BANK BUILDING ELLIOTT B. KNETSCH
MICHAEL J. MAYER
VANCE B. GRANNIS,JR.• 161 NORTH CONCORD EXCHANGE TIMOTHY J BERG
PATRICK A. FARRELL SOUTH ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55075
DAVID L. GRANNIS,111
ROGER N. KNUTSON
DAVID L. HARMEYER TELEPHONE(612)455-1661
January 17, 1989
' 'Also ADMITTED To
PRACTICE IN WISCONSIN
I
' Mr. Don Ashworth
City of Chanhassen
690 Coulter Street
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Re: City of Chanhassen vs. Bernard Hanson, et al
Court File No. 88-23713
' (Chanhassen Lawn and Sports )
Dear Don:
' Pursuant to your request, we have postponed the
commissioners hearing which was scheduled for January 19 , 1989 at
the Chanhassen City Hall. It is my understanding that you are
attempting to negotiate a settlement directly with Mr. Hanson. I
would appreciate it if you would keep me advised as to your
progress in these negotiations.
' Very truly yours ,
GRANNIS, GRANNIS, FARRELL,
& KNUTSON, P.A.
BY:
Patrick A. arrell
' PAF/rh
JAN 19 1989
CITY.OF CHANFiASSEN
I
M.A. Gedney Company
CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 / (612) 8-2612
Dear Community Leader:
' Because you are in a position of leadership and influence in our
community, we are providing you with some background information
related to the enclosed press release. This press release is being
sent to all metro area newspapers, and we expect it will appear on
' their next publication date.
Because of the concentration of many regional distributors into a few
powerful national distributors, the last two years has seen a decline
' in the profitability of our food service products until they are now
being sold at a loss in order to remain competitive. We do not expect
any improvement in this situation in the foreseeable future.
' On the other hand, we see opportunities for growth in our other
product lines. The decision to leave the food service business will
allow us to concentrate our efforts on these opportunities. However,
' it also results in a reduction in the workforce in all departments of
our company. Some of this reduction has occurred through attrition,
but most of it has been done through termination. This action
involves the release of both factory and salaried people, and will
' undoubtedly have some negative impact on the economy of the community,
as well as being very stressful for the departing employees and their
families. We are employing a number of measures to minimize this
' impact:
We are retaining a professional consulting organization to
provide counselling in job interviewing, resume' preparation, job
' search techniques, and other skills designed to help find new
jobs and maintain a positive attitude during this period of
stress.
- We have developed a list of area employers who may be hiring and
are advising them of the availability of these well-trained
and highly desirable people.
- We are financing and facilitating the obtaining of unemployment
compensation for these people while they seek other employment.
' - Future manpower additions by our company will be filled wherever
possible by people from this group.
These highly valued employees are leaving only because their jobs have
been eliminated, and we anticipate in this time of high demand for
qualified employees that the transition period between jobs will be
short.
Anything you and your associates can do to help find employment for
these people, will, of course, be appreciated by all concerned.
We have studied this situation for months, and only recently decided
to take this action which we believe will, in the long run, benefit
our employees, our company, and this community of which we are so
proud to be a member.
1 Sincerely yours,
RL-LCZAVEJ
toy ol JAN 19 1989
Gedney Tutt'�:
President CITY OF CHANhASSLN
11 M. A. Gedney Company
PICKLES PEPPERS .1 RELISH CONDIMENTS if VINEGAR '.4! SAUERKRAUT
1
r ,4 ' ) M.A. Gedney Company
CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 / (612) 448-2612
January 18, 1989
PRESS RELEASE
Dramatic changes in the long range strategic plan of the M. A.
' Gedney Company have resulted in its withdrawal from the restaurant
and institutional segment of its business . Gedney will focus its
entire attention on the retail consumer segment of its business
' which consists of pickles, salad dressings and vinegar distributed
through the supermarket under the Gedney label as well as other
labels . Gedney will continue to grow its contract packing and
industrial business.
M. A. Gedney, established in 1881 and a leader in the retail pickle
and vinegar business , plans on continuing to be a vital part of
the Minnesota community.
1
I
I
1
' PICKLES ' If PEPPERS 19 RELISH _. V CONDIMENTS ''3( VINEGAR SAUERKRAUT
1 �L _ t� .�f'
LAW OFFICES
GRANNIS, GRANNIS, FARRELL & KNUTSON
DAVID L. GRANNIS-1874-1961 PROFESSIONAI.AssociATioN TELECOPIER:
DAVID I.. GRANNIS,JR. - 1910-1980 POST OFFICE Box 57 (612) 455-2359
1 403 NORWES"F BANK BUILDING ELLIOTT B. KNETSCH
VANCE B. GRANNIS MICHAEL J. MAYER
VANCE B GRANNIS,JR.• 16I NORTH CONCORD EXCHANGE TIMOTHY J BERG
PATRICK A. FARRELL
' DAVID L. GRANNIS,III SOUTH ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55075
ROGER N. KNUTsoN TELEPIIONE(612)455-1661
DAVID I.. HARMEYER
•AISO
PRACIICEUR;E IN WISCONSIN
January 10, 1WISCONSIN
1 Mr. Michael J. Dwyer
Mackall, Crounse & Moore
1600 TCF Tower
121 South Eighth Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
1 RE: Moon Valley
Dear Mr. Dwyer:
' If your client intends to commence excavation in the Spring,
he must apply for and obtain an excavation permit from the City
of Chanhassen. Since this process takes several weeks to
complete, he should start early if he wants to operate in the
Spring. If he commences operation without a permit, the City will
seek an injunction and prosecute him criminally.
1 Very truly your
GIs ► NIS, FARR L )
' & , . TSON, P A.
BY: '/ f2'�
' Rog Knutson ``
RNK:srn er .
cc: Mayor and Councilmembers
(-Don Ashworth
Steve Hanson
Larry Brown
Gary Warren
Jim Chaffee
1 JAN 12 1989
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
I
CITY OF
C Fi ANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
January 11, 1989
Mr. Walter B. Boorsma
' Great Western Piping Corporation
8101 Scandia Trail
Forest Lake, MN 55025
' Dear Mr. Boorsma,
This letter is to confirm our meeting on January 9, 1989, at
' Chanhassen City Hall . Attending this meeting were Assistant City
Engineer Larry Brown, Utility Superintendent Jerry Boucher, you
and myself. The purpose of this meeting was to reach a deter-
mination as to what the City of Chanhassen would accept regarding
' any misunderstanding with the utility lines at Family of Christ
Lutheran Church in Chanhassen.
' Following are the requirements that everyone agreed upon to be
provided by you:
' 1 . You are to provide drawings providing the following data:
A. The exact location of the lines;
B . An exact description of the material that was put
' into the ground, including the type of pipe;
C. The type of connection;
D . Where the building shut-off valve is .
2 . Mr. Boucher and Mr. Brown agreed to accept the hydrostatic
test that was previously conducted.
' 3 . A letter from you to the City of Chanhassen, attention
Mr. Jerry Boucher, stating that the City of Chanhassen
will not be held liable for any problems resulting from
' the fact that the lines were not visually inspected to our
satisfaction. This letter is in lieu of having you dig
up the lines for our visual inspection.
' I appreciate the input you provided, and am sorry for any misun-
dertandings that may have occurred. I appreciate your
willingness to cooperate with us . Please feel free to contact us
' if we can provide any additional information or assistance to
you.
I
Mr . Walter Boorsma
January 11, 198
Page 2
I am requesting that the above information be provided no later '
than January 27, 1989 .
Sincer y, '
Scott Harr 1
Assistant Public Safety Director
SH:cd ,
cc: Don Ashworth, City Manager
Jerry Boucher, Utility Superintendent
Larry Brown, Assistant City Engineer
Mr. Thomas Simons, Vanman Construction
1
ii ,
CITY OF
il .,,
, :,
\ CHANHASSEN
1 N
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
IMEMORAND-"M
ITO: Community Center Task Force
FROM: Lori Sietsema, Park and Recreation Coordinator
1 DATE: January 19, 1989
•
SUBJ: Update and Next Meeting
IThe City Council was brought up-to-date as to the discussions of
the Community Center Task Force at the January 9 , 1989 City
Council meeting. The Council was told that the Task Force has
Idiscussed three alternatives; the first involving a community
center constructed adjacent to Chanhassen Elementary; the second,
a ten acre parcel on the Eckankar site; and the third, a com-
1 munity center and school campus on the Eckankar site.
Attached please find the minutes of the last Community Center
I Task Force meeting. These minutes have been revised to include
Bill Boyt' s comments regarding the campus alternative and Brad
Johnson' s comments regarding the City' s ability to purchase the
Eckankar property. Also attached please find a letter from Don
I Ashworth to Eckankar' s attorney, Peter Beck, confirming an
earlier discussion regarding their willingness to sell the pro-
perty to the City.
'
I As you may have heard by now, Chaska is proceeding with their own
plans to build a community center. I have included for your
I information their report prepared for them outlining costs,
facilities , etc.
As the question of operational revenue and expenses is becoming a
I factor, I have invited the Eden Prairie Community Center Manager,
Tom Eastman to attend our next meeting. Tom would like to
discuss the operational budget of the Eden Prairie Community
ICenter and how the facilities work together.
The next meeting of the Community Center Task Force will be held
on Wednesday, February 1 at 7 : 30 p.m. at City Hall. Please call
1
me at 937-1900 if you are unable to attend.
Attachments:
1 1 . Community Center Task Force Minutes .
2 . City Council Minutes dated January 9 , 1989 .
1 3 . Letter to Peter Beck.
4 . Chaska Community Center Report.
1
II
COMMUNITY CENTER TASK FORCE MEETING MINUTES
DECEMBER 21 , 1988 '
Members Present: Tom Akins , Jim Mady, Ursula Dimler, Brad
Johnson, Colleen Klingelhutz , Bob Robinett, Bill Boyt and
Bob Ostlund.
Call to Order: The meeting was called to order at 7: 45 p.m. by
Chairman Jim Mady.
Debt Limitations - Community Center: Don Ashworth reviewed his
memorandum of December 20 , 1988 . Issues presented at the last
Task Force meeting generated discussion over differences between
"legal debt capacity" versus "existing debt capacity" . The com-
mittee
had also asked what tax implications might be if the City
exceeded existing debt standards. Various questions were raised;
however, the report appeared to be generally understood.
Committee member Bill Boyt suggested that the minutes reflect
that the statistics within the report had been prepared by the
City' s financial advisor, Andy Merry.
Don Ashworth stated that Mr. Ostlund was present to respond to '
questions occurring at our last meeting regarding the school
district' s interest in the community center proposal and poten-
tial
funding concepts. One of the funding concepts presented at
the last meeting was the ability to use tax increment revenues as
a part of the project. The possibility of this funding source
has occurred as a result of the 1988 change in State law.
Specifically, the legislature placed into Statute a section
attempting to stop Housing and Redevelopment Authorities from
gaining an undue "windfall" because of "excess levy referendums
of school districts . " Specifically, property values existing
within a tax increment district continue to be spread between
County/City/school district. However, new values created as a
result of new construction are channeled to the HRA who has sup-
posedly calculated the proposed taxes from those new facilities
and will only be capturing the amounts necessary to pay for the
roads/sewers/structures demolished to carry out such redevelop-
ment. As the mill rate charged against the new development is
exactly the same as for all other properties within the com-
munity, an excess levy referendum for school purposes hypotheti-
cally
produces a "windfall" for the local HRA. It was this
loophole the legislature wished to fill and, again, established the
language in the statutes stating that those windfall dollars
would be calculated separated by the County Auditor' s Office and
forwarded to the school district over and above the amounts
levied by the school district for general school purposes
[ therefore, now producing a windfall for the school district] .
However, the legislature also made one exception - if a city
wants that excess levy money, it can keep it.
The change in state law will in all likelihood create a myriad of
school district/city battles throughout the state. Recognizing
this potential, the city and school started working several
months ago trying to determine how best to address this issue ,
COMMUNITY CENTER TASK FORCE MINUTES
DECEMBER 21 , 1988
Page 2
without creating potential battle lines . One of the concepts
considered was the possibility of both the City and the school
' district agreeing that certain projects may benefit both the
school and community, i .e. community center, gymnasium, etc.
A new gymnasium or community center could be beneficial to both
the City and school. The above statements had been made by Don
Ashworth at the last meeting and, again, the members had
requested that Mr. Ostlund be present to provide his thoughts on
the subject.
' Mr. Ostlund stated that the school board was positive in its
reaction to the proposed community center adjacent to the elemen-
t tary school . That presentation was made prior to the time that
the committee prepared the Lake Ann option and, accordingly,
reaction to that proposal has not yet occurred. Secondarily, the
board has only briefly reviewed the concept of using excess levy
revenues ( tax increment windfall dollars) for joint City/school
purposes . The concept has been presented and seems to be
receiving very favorable review. Specifically, the City of
Chaska has approached the school district with exactly that same
proposal as it would relate to the construction of a community
center in the City of Chaska. Although the discussions with
Chanhassen has occurred for a longer period of time than in
' Chaska, it appears as though their proposal is moving more
quickly and, as a result, it was the Chaska proposal which was
reviewed by the school board. Again, that proposal appeared to
' receive a lot of positive interest with very few negatives being
brought to the forefront. The Chaska proposal appears to be one
of having the City release its tax increment dollars to the
' school district, having the City carrying out the construction of ,
the community center, and receiving a pledge from the school
district to make payments back to the City equal to the amount
distributed to the school by the County Auditor. Again, no
' votes were taken on the issue and significant legal/technical
work will be required to be completed before a specific proposal
can be voted upon. Again, the proposal did receive a favorable
' review and Chaska was encouraged to define such further. Mr .
Ostlund did not know of any reason why a similar proposal would
not be received well by the school board for Chanhassen and that
all of the discussions to date between the school representatives
' and City staff have generally been along the same lines as that
proposed by Chaska.
' Brad Johnson asked what amount of money may be generated from tax
increment excess levies . The Manager responded that such would
be approximately $1,500 ,000 which would equate to approximately
$1,000 ,000 in construction dollars . The Manager noted that the
dollar amount could be higher depending on the number of years
i
COMMUNITY CENTER TASK FORCE MEETING MINUTES
DECEMBER 21, 1988
Page 3
being pledged. The Manager also noted that the December 20 , 1988
report regarding availability of construction dollars did not
include the dollars which may be available from tax increment
revenues. Mr. Johnson stated that he felt that this was an
important point and should be included in the minutes, i .e.
should voters decide that a community center is desirable, then
approximately 3 million dollars would be available without
increasing property taxes (assumes tax increment revenues would
be available) , and that such referendum could state that
$5,000_,000 could be available in the next five-year period of '
time. Further that if the City did tax for that full $5,000 ,000
program that such would not increase taxes more than $60 to $100 .
If the project were scaled back to a $4, 000 ,000 level that the
taxes would be about $40 to $70 in homes ranging from $100 , 000 to
$150,000 in market value.
Councilman Boyt suggested that the Lake Ann option be in '
the form of two options - 1) the community center concept as pre-
viously presented; and 2 ) as the site for a new middle school
sitecommunity center. The idea of the second alternative would
be one of the City acquiring the acreage needed for the school to
build a middle school . A condition would be that the school
include construction of community center facilities and thus pro-
duce
the same types of benefits for both the school and city as
are currently being considered for the Chanhassen Elementary
site. A secondary benefit to the City would be in assuring that
the middle school location was in fact Chanhassen. The committee
generally supported that this alternative should be pursued and
that update reports be provided. Don Ashworth should meet with
school representatives to determine whether they would be ame-
nable
to such an idea.
Brad Johnson questioned whether Eckankar would in fact sell a
portion of their property for either the community center or
school/community center concept. Specifically, he is aware of a
number of offers that have been sent to Eckankar which were imme-
diately refused. It would be a big mistake to go into the com- '
munity with the concept of a community center being built at Lake
Ann Park if in fact there is no commitment from Eckankar to such.
The City Manager should write Eckankar to confirm the previous
verbal commitment received by him. Committee members appeared to
be in agreement. No vote was taken.
Chairman Mady stated that the Park and Recreation Commission '
feels a strong need to complete at least a portion of the trail
system. Given the last defeat, the Commission would probably not
come back with a full-blown trail system; but, instead limit such
to major roadways, i .e. County Road 17, Highway 101 , Minnewashta
Parkway, etc. Mr. Mady did not know the specific amount that may
be needed for such trail construction but would sincerely ask
1
1
I COMMUNITY CENTER TASK FORCE MINUTES
DECEMBER 21, 1989
PAGE 4
Ithat the Community Center Task Force to not take a position which
would totally deplete or leave no monies available for trail
I construction. Leaving about $300 , 000 of unused legal debt capa-
city would assure support from people within the community still
desiring a trail system.
1 The Commission generally discussed whether a report should be
presented to the City Council in January. Work activity
currently being scheduled for the January City Council agenda may
I preclude that from occurring. Additionally, members appeared to
be skeptical of attempting to present a full presentation given
the vagueness of each of the two proposals . If the City Council
I wished for some form of update or generalized report, such should
be considered by the Manager.
IAdjournment: The meeting adjourned at 9 : 45 p.m.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
J I ty Council Meeting - January 9, 1989 2 II
Gary Warren: I guess my own perception of the roadway geometries which was kind
of brought to light by some of the work that we did with the signage issue up in
Near Mountain subdivision. The Pleasant View Road, there isn't much we can do
with the geometries anymore and Councilmember Boyt is correct and I fully
support the fact that signs do not control speed. Enforcement is the key to
that issue. However, in this case, any of us who are familiar with driving
Pleasant View Road realize that with the trees and with the old road that it is
and the geometric, the rapid changes in alignment, that we just really did not
have good signage out there. I think from a liability standpoint, I was
concerned that we at least did what we could to improve that area.
Councilwoman Dimler: I guess I had a hard time reading these maps. Are they
mostly caution signs or watch for children or what kind of signs?
Gary Warren: They're mostly signs, speed limit signs and direction advisory '
signs. There are a few no parking signs that are in zones that were already
established.
Councilman Johnson: Hidden driveway signs.
Gary Warren: And one hidden driveway sign. A new one. '
Mayor Chmiel: We have moved and seconded the approved signage package for
Pleasant View with a condition in there that we notify the people on Pleasant
View. That a copy of the attached map showing locations would be provided to
those adjacent residents within the area and any discussion from those people to
come back to City staff.
Councilman Boyt moved, Councilman Johnson seconded to approve the Signage
Package for Pleasant View Road with the condition that the people along Pleasant
View Road be provided the map attached to the package showing the locations of
signs. All voted in favor and the motion carried.
VISITORS PRESENTATION: Three friends from Chaska presented a gift to the new
Mayor, Mayor Chmiel.
COMMUNITY CENTER TASK FORCE, UPDATE REPORT.
Jim Mady: For those of you who aren't aware, my name is Jim Mady. I was the 1
Chairman of the Chanhassen Community Center Task Force. We'd like to update you
as to what we've learned to date. The Community Center Task Force has met for
the past 7 months reviewing the possibilities of building a community center in
Chanhassen. I am excited at what we have found to date. Our efforts have found
two feasible alternatives that differ in location costs and timing. Our study
show that our City has a legal bonding limit that allows for the sale of up to 2
million dollars in bonds today over what has already been scheduled. This legal
debt limit increases by 1/2 million dollars each year due to growth in our city.
This 2 million dollars in bonds can be sold without increasing taxes. Any
higher bonding limit for the coming years will necessitate an increase in
property taxes. The City can work with the school district on a financing
arrangement that increases the amount of bonds the City can legally sell by up
16
City Council Meeting - January 9, 1989
II to 1 1/2 million dollars. The Chaska School Board has shown interest in sharing
facilities and makes this financing arrangement feasible. This is the same
concept as being studied by the City of Chaska to build a community center at
' the Chaska School Complex. The task force has developed two feasible
alternatives. The first site is located on land owned by Eckankar on TH 5 and
adjacent to the east side of Lake Ann Park. Due to higher costs associated with
' this site, because of land acquisition and development costs, the City may not
be able to construct a full community center on this site until our bonding
ability catches up to the cost. The preliminary cost estimate on this site is
4.8 million dollars and may not be fully constructed until possibly the year
1994. It would also require a substantial tax increase. The other alternative,
the City Center Park/Elementary School site is located west of the elementary
school and fire station and north of the City Hall. It carries a price tag of
3.3 million dollars. Based on preliminary discussions with the Chaska School
Board, this alternative may be financially feasible today. The facility on this
site includes specialty classrooms for the elementary school. Our discussions
' focused on the needs of additional learning spaces such as band and music rooms,
computer labs and other specialty rooms. These rooms would not be used to
increase the number of students at the elementary school. The building at
either site is envisioned to hold a pool, gymnasium, racquetball courts, ice
arena, senior citizen center and meeting rooms. It should be able to handle a
population of 35,000 and operate financially self sufficient. We plan to start
public discussion very soon. The first step is to inform the city residents as
to the alternatives. We will be going to each of the city commissions and
providing an update to them and getting their input just as we are doing here
tonight. We hope the local papers will publish articles on the alternatives and
financing options. Once we have received citizen input, we will report our
II findings back to you for your action. Thank you for your time. I am excited by
what we have found to date and invite any questions you may have on the
concepts.
Councilman Johnson: I will continue to emphasize, and it wasn't in here. In
the packet we have. I want to be convinced that we can operate a facility of
this size with our small population and not have to support it's operating costs
The cost we're talking about here is just to build it. When it gets
operational, I want that facility, if we build a facility, to be totally self
supporting. You state in your report that it will be. I once drove through
' Missouri so show me. I want to see the report. I know you work with numbers
yourself so I'd like to see it in an understandable report because there's a lot
of people who are going to ask the same question so I think that's one thing to
' get prepared for. I like what you've done here so far. I know that that's
been, I've attended several of those meetings and they have been very tough
meetings with a lot of people working very hard to make sure that all the is
' are crossed and i's dotted and playing devil's advocate and everything else.
It's been quite a challenge to your group and I'd like to commend you also on
the long hours everybody has been putting in. Ursula I believe is on the
committee there and Bill. A lot of people here, Brad and a lot of our citizens
have done a lot of good work on this. I think we've got something that may be
feasible and help out our schools and everything. That's my only comment.
Councilman Boyt: I think that one of the reasons that Jim came here tonight was
to find out if the new Council supports the process. I think it's very
important before he and the committee spend time bringing this to the community -
to know if the concept of spending 3 or 4 million dollars on a community center
17
r
City Council Meeting - January 9, 1989 II
has support of the Council. So that's one comment. Another one is, it clearly
has my support. I think that there was a third option presented that was sort
of late in the process and maybe hasn't been pursued very hard, but that was the ,
possibility of working even closer with the school district by buying the
property and encouraging the school district to build a middle school or high
school which would provide a good bit of the community center space and the city
would supplement that with additional space. When we started this process we
were really after increasing gym space and providing some recreational
opportunities that weren't available in our city. There's any number of ways to
get at that. You've got two of them Jim and I support your taking those to the
community and getting their feedback so we can continue to make progress.
Councilman Workman: What's the precise acreage up here by the school site?
Jim Mady: The entire park and school land?
Councilman Workman: Yes. The land that the school owns that would be used for
this?
Jim Mady: The school property itself, now keep in mind that this site is two
parcels of land. There's the city owned parcel which is the site that goes from
the fire hall straight west all the way to Kerber Blvd. where the hockey rinks
are and the ice skating rink and one of the ballfields. That's all city owned
property. The school owns the remainder of the property from that site north.
I don't have with me...
Councilman Workman: Available space available behind the elementary school, I
basically we're putting in how much property is that in acreage?
Councilwoman Dimler: Mr. Mayor, I know the answer to that if I could answer. I
stepped it off with my father-in-law who's a farmer and it is just slightly over
11 acres that would be there for building.
Couniclman Workman: I was at the Chaska Chamber meeting today and Mayor Ruedke
down there gave his state of the town speech and they're getting more and more
excited about their own facility down there. How closely are we, we're tied
into Chaska quite closely and they're ready to throw 5 million into it
apparently with a hocky arena and everything else. Activists are working hard
to get their own hockey arena. In getting back to Jay's point, with the hockey
arena being a very large portion of this and many suggestions about sharing this
kind of a facility with Shakopee, Chaska, Chanhassen. How closely are we
looking at that angle?
Jim Mady: There are two points to consider on an ice arenda. First off is
construction. An ice arena will cost in the neighborhood of $8,000.00 to
$9,000.00. The second item to remember is what that thing, what the ice arena
will bring into the operating budget. Based on numbers given to us by both the
Eden Prairie Community Center and the Minnetonka Ice Arena, the ice arena would
generate excess operating revenues of at least $100,000.00 over it's operating
cost. Those dollars would then be thrown back into the operating budget to
cover programs that will not sustain themselves.
Councilman Workman: But even if the Chaska Hawks Hockey team is playing hockey
in Chaska not here? '
18 1
City Council Meeting - January 9, 1989 ice:
Jim Mady: We're not banking totally on the Chaska Hawks. We have a commitment
a verbal commitment from the Minnetonka Ice Association to rent 500 hours of ice
with this facility. There is a shortage of ice throughout the metropolitan
area. Currently the Chaska Hawks are playing in the Shakopee bubble. The
Shakopee bubble exists on a day to day basis. If it goes down, Shakopee has no
' plans at this time to build an ice arena. My understanding is that if that were
to happen, it's a good chance that the Chanhassen hockey program would move as
far away as possibly LeSeur. There just isn't facilities around so maybe Chaska
might build their own. My understanding previously was that they are looking at
' an ice arena and it would be in Phase 2 of their program. I don't know when
that is. I'm not fully aware of everything and the timelines of their program.
There was an article in I believe it is the January 5th issue of the South Shore
' News that covered that. There's a couple of paragraphs in there. It looks like
they're moving somewhat slow right now trying to organize their financing.
They've got some things they're looking for. I think the number was $175,000.00
' a year from the school system so they're needing to get their ducks in order
just as we are.
Councilman Workman: They do things a little bit different down there. I
believe they paid cash for their brand new city hall. They do things a little
bit differently and that's why looking at $84.00 per year raised taxes and stuff
and that sounds all fairly for adding a lot more. This is my concern is that
1 we're adding a lot more debt. I have two little girls and I'd like to go on
record as saying I'd love to have a community center. But again within reason
and that's what I'm trying to figure out. If it's all going to be able to flow
II IL because there's so many things going around. I hear Waconia's thinking about
their own. If all that happens and everybody has their own community centers,
will our town support that?
Jim Mady: Preliminary estimates and numbers that we've been given and the
information that we've been given from the Eden Prairie Community Center
facility manager of the previous task force, at least the first task force
' strongly felt we could do it. Be self sufficient without any problems. There':s
no guarantees in life but the numbers all show that it can work.
Councilman Workman: Otherwise the committee has basically, are not favorable to
' property at Lake Ann which we already own?
Jim Mady: The Lake Ann site itself was looked at. It has two problems. Number
' one, the City has a standing agreement with the Metropolitan Waste Commission
that we will not enter into the built sewers in the non-sewered area of
Chanhassen. Lake Ann Park, as it sits now, is outside the MUSA line,
Metropolitan Urban Service Area, and we can not enter into that sewer line from
that parcel.
Councilman Workman: The Eckankar is outside of that line?
' Jim Mady: Eckankar is within, the line's right there. Eckankar is within.
Lake Ann is without. The second item there is the voters have already asked us,
passed the referendum to construct badly needed ballfields and parking at Lake
Ann. Unless you want to tear down some very beautiful forests on Lake Ann,
there simply isn't the room to do all those things out there.
I
19
11
1-"—City Council Meeting - January 9, 1989
Lori Sietsema: If I could add a third item. The land at Lake Ann Park was 1
acquired with LAWCON funds which are federal funds and you have to go through a
conversion process to convert those into indoor recreational facilities. It
doesn't happen very easily. It's a big long process and you have to look at, if '
there's any other alternatives for the facility that you want to build, if there
is any other alternative, they'll deny you that. So we can't do anything but
outdoor activity at Lake Ann Park without that approval. That has to be federal
and state approval.
Mayor Chmiel: If a city is proposing to put in a community center within those
lines for strictly city use, I think they would move on those positions without
much problem, from what I understand too. From what you just said, it's hard to
have than move or actually approve this within a short period of time or they
may even deny it. '
Lori Sietsema: The only way, I talked to LAWCON, the people in detail about
this and one of the things that we would have to do is replace the acreage that
we're building an indoor facility on if indeed there is no other alternative for
the the facility. But number one, there has to be no other alternative and
number two, you have to replace the property with lake property. As far as, it
impacts it so much that way, they're building TH 5, an additional easement to go
to the south because the conversion process is so stringent. That's what I've
been told by that office.
Councilman Johnson: So MnDot avoided trying to do that conversion process? '
Lori Sietsema: Yes. 1_11
Councilman Johnson: They're not going to take on the feds.
Councilwoman Dimler: I'd like to commend Jim Mady for the work that he's done.
He's been through a difficult process. I guess the comments that I would like,
as Bill Boyt said, that it's up to the Council. I don't really feel it is. The
only thing we'll be doing is voting on whether we'll put it on the referendum to
the people. Therefore, at your public hearings, I would suggest that in order
to feel the people out, get a king of poll after each meeting. After you
present than with the different locations and I would suggest you do mention the
third option and maybe even ask them if they have a particular site that they'd
like to see it at so we can get a full picture of what the public is thinking.
Then at that time, poll them, attach sheets of paper and fold them to see which
site they prefer and if indeed they want a community center. Having those two
questions on there I think would give us a good idea of what we should then go
ahead and put on the referendum.
Mayor Chmiel: One other point I'd like to bring up, or question I should ask 1
is, where and what areas are you going to contact within the City to make your
informational hearings at?
Jim Mady: That hasn't been decided yet. I would assume that we would hold
public meetings as we did in the past at Minnetonka Intermediate School.
Chanhassen Elementary School. Various meetings that are held throughout the
city from time to time. It would be the Legion people and the Hockey
Association, APT, St. Hubert's. Whatever groups have meetings and will allow us
on their agenda, we tend to try and go there and bring the information.
20
11
rCity Council Meeting - January 9, 1989
rCouncilman Johnson: I continue to support this. I believe that one thing I
don't want to see is a rise in taxes to do it. When you look at an $85.00 a
' year increase for $100,000.00 if we go to the Eckankar site, that scares me. I
can't see our voters approving that. From my feel of the voters here. Does the
grade school site, is that like, for lack of a better word, the Filly site, is
' that balanced to a point where we're not raising taxes to build that one? That
we'll be retiring debt, enough retired debt to cover it and it will be a break
even?
Jim Mady: My understanding of the way this works is, right now we're given a
mil levy. The City has the ability to sell an additional 2 million dollars over
what already is on the books or is scheduled to be sold with the fire truck. We
' have the ability right now to go for an additional 2 million dollars. Through
using the school, the sharing of the school and the City financing option which
gets into the excess levy on the tax increment district, the City can pick up an
' additional 1 1/2 million dollars when we work with the school board.
Councilman Johnson: That's enough to build that one but my question is, if we
' do that, what's the effect on local taxes?
Jim Mady: Right now we would be able to leave the mil levy as it is. If none
of the options are built, we would be able to, the Council would be able to
possibly reduce taxes up to I think it's about $45.00 on a $100,000.00 house or
they have the option_of reducing debt quicker. Retiring it.
Mayor Chmiel: Jim, with the other members too on the committee, what's the
consensus of feeling from them, the school site? Eckankar site?
Jim Mady: We really didn't take a vote. We're basically coming out to the
' people and saying, here are the numbers. Here's the cost. Here's the time
lines that we have been told. Give us your input. That's what we're really
doing right now. We want the citizens of Chanhassen to tell us what they want
r to do. Let each individual make up their own mind based on the numbers as they
stand today.
' Councilman Boyt: If I might follow up here. I think the one thing Jim that you
and the committee need to keep in mind is that, at least from my perspective,
the City can not spend all it's bonding capacity on a community center. To do
so would be to deny the potential for quite a long time of having a trail and
' sidewalk program of any kind other than what we funded out of new construction.
I think a very significant part of the population wants that program. It's
failed twice by a handful of votes each time. I'm not prepared to see the City
' sink all it's money into the community center even though I strongly support the
center. I think we need to be saving some money for the trail system or for
another option that the community says that they want.
Jim Mady: One thing to keep in mind is the City's legal bonding limit is
growing a 1/2 million dollars per year and that growth is estimated to continue
at least through the year 1995.
Brad Johnson: I'm on the task force and I was also involved in the first one
and spent a lot of time running around fighting the antis and I think we've
spent a lot of time on this particular situation trying to figure out, how can
21
r
34
City Coun:il Meeting - January 9, 1989 . 1
we get a consensus because we think it can carry if in fact everybody feels that
the site is the correct site. The time table is the correct site and the
financing is the correct site. Or at least the public is given the chance to do
that. I could even sense tonight, you asked the question, which is the better
site. I don't think most of us are going to say which is the better site. We
think we need a community center. We think if we don't go through the process
correctly, the community center will be defeated because people will be upset we
didn't go through the correct process. I think it's unfair then to ask which
one we feel is the best. I would say that if there's 15 members on a program, 5
are prejudice to Lake Ann for various reasons and 5 are prejudice towards the
school site for various reasons and some of us are prejudice for other reasons.
I think we can't, all of us haven't collected our thoughts as to what to do but
I do believe that we must, that it's going to take a combined effort of what
I'll call the group that voted against it or led the original fight against the
Filly site, to combine with the guys that are trying to still do it. We have a
couauittee that's made up of both parties. I'm still not sure we've come to a
consensus but maybe by listening to the public, we'll be able to figure that
out. Secondly, I think as far as the Chaska issue is concerned, we're a year
and a half ahead of Chaska. We've already had one defeat. I think they have to
go through that. They're not even thinking about a referendum until next summer
and they're up to 5-10 million dollars. Chaska is a different community. It's
not our community. We're in Chanhassen. We have two school districts to
service. They only have one. We also service the Minnetonka school district.
Our community has nothing to bring the whole community together and I think this
is one effort that does do that. We can't change the school system around. We
have a good elementary that keeps our community together but I don't think the
rest is true. As far as hockey or ice arena useage is concerned, our other
half, the Minnetonka side of the school district would buy all the time.
There's just no doubt. And if not, Eden Prairie would so there's no problem.
And you could build one in Waconia and you could build one wherever and they'd
all be filled up in the metropolitan area. I don't think you have to be too
concerned, short term of what would happen in that particular case. But I think
the key element in here is that we want to go out. There's two issues. One is, .:
what site? Before we can go to the referendum, we have to have a site. I think
we want the public to give us as much input as possible. I admit that it's hard
not to be prejudice and I think all of us have to work when we make a
presentation to follow the presentation that's not too prejudice. Once that's
accomplished and we have a site, we have to come back to you with the financial
feasibility of it all in a proposal and if you feel it's, I don't think you're
going to say go ahead and do a referendum until you feel it's financially
feasible. Then finally, like Jay was saying, and part of it's the tax question,
and then I think whether we do it or not, all of us have to work hard, who are
volunteers to try to sell the community on it. I think that's the process we're
asking to go through. The purpose of this night's meeting was to bring you up
to speed on where we are and all the work we've done. You've got two members on
the Council that are a part of the committee and Jay sits in periodically and we
welcome all of you but I think it's a real, you really got to think about it.
Why we do it and maybe we won't do it if the voters say no, but some of us like
a chance at it and I think that's the way it's goes.
PUBLIC HEARING: VACATION OF OUTLOT A LOCATED BETWEEN LOT 2, BLOCK 1 AND LOT 1
BLOCK 2, CARVER BEACH ESTATES, NORTH SIDE OF LAKE LUCY ROAD, BOECK-KEVITT
PARTNERSHIP.
22 ,
• 1.�
City Council Meeting - January 9, 1989
II Steve Hanson: This is a request to vacate an outlot in Carver Beach Estates
located between Lot 2, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2 on the north side of Lake Lucy
II Road. The owners of this parcel requested that this be vacated so they could
split the parcel and return the pieces back to the adjoining lots. We've gone
through, in trying to do the review, we had scheduled this assuming that it was
a simple vacation and we've turned up some loose ends that we haven't been able
to tie up at this point in time. What I've suggested in the staff report is
that because we have advertised for a public hearing, that you open the public
hearing. Take any testimony from the public that's here so they have their
' opportunity to voice their opinion at that hearing and then we'll do the
follow-up and bring this back to you when we're able to complete the research on
this particular item.
Mayor Chmiel called the public hearing to order. Councilman Johnson moved,
Councilwoman Dimler seconded to close the public hearing. All voted in favor
and the motion carried. The public hearing was closed.
Councilwoman Dimler: I did talk to the Art Owens family today, who is affected
by this and they seem to have no problems with it at all.
Councilman Boyt moved, Councilman Johnson seconded to table the vacation of
' Outlot A located between Lot 2, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2 of Carver Beach
Estates for the Boeck-Kevitt Partnership until the January 23, 1989 meeting.
IL '
All voted in favor and the motion carried.
SIDEYARD SETBACK VARIANCE REQUEST FOR A PARKING LOT, EARLY BEGINNINGS DAYCARE
CENTER, 1450 PARK COURT, ROME CORPORATION.
Steve Hanson: The Board of Adjustments met prior to City Council tonight to
consider the variance for this particular request. I passed out a sheet
earlier, before you sat down and opened the meeting, that covers the
justification for granting the variance. The Board of Adjustments made those
findings and approved the variance as requested and they approved it with two
conditions. The first of those being that the area to the north along the
' parking area where it encroaches on the setback, that that be screened with
evergreens. Then the second condition was the request that's before you has
essentially where it's overlapping on that setback is a driveway servicing some
parking stalls. They requested that the second condition be that that area not
be used for parking, meaning the driveway and that it be signed or striped
accordingly.
' Councilman Boyt moved, Councilman Workman seconded to approve the sideyard
setback variance request for a parking lot, Early Beginnings Daycare Center,
1450 Park Court, Rome Corporation with the following conditions:
1. The area to the north along the parking area where it encroaches on the
setback, be screened with evergreens.
2. The driveway where it's overlapping the setback, not be used for parking and
be signed or striped accordingly.
All voted in favor and the motion carried.
' 23
CITY OF
.....
.-
II
CHANHASSEN
vi'l' ,„ -
„1„,..
-4'" 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 II
(612) 937-1900
I
`
January 12, 1989
Larkin, Hoffman, Daly, Lindgren, Ltd.
II
Attn: Mr. Peter Beck
1500 Norwest Financial Center
7900 Xerxes Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55431
I
Re: Community Center - Eckankar Property
Dear Mr. Beck: I
Approximately six months ago I contacted you regarding whether II Eckankar would consider selling an approximate 10 to 15 acre par-
cel in the southwest corner of the Eckankar property for the City
to construct a community center. After passing the request along
to the church, you contacted me stating that representatives of
I
Eckankar had discussed this item and would be willing to sell
such a parcel if this was a priority of the City of Chanhassen,
i .e. Eckankar does not currently have the property on the market I
and they would prefer to maintain the integrity of the entire
parcel while decisions are being made as to its long-term use.
However, again, if this were a priority for the City and that
location was desired by the community, Eckankar would be willing
�� II
to sell such. There would be no strings associated with the
sale.
In terms of the selling price to the City, you had conveyed that II
Eckankar would be willing to sell the parcel at its cost, i .e.
the cost per acre would be the cost paid by Eckankar per acre,
II
plus pro-rated shares of any special assessments, taxes, etc. , as
well as holding costs which would approximate typical interest
rates during that period. [Note: Your description to me of the
selling price was not as elaborate as shown in this letter. The
II
elaboration represents solely my interpretation of your more
generalized statements. The reason for my elaboration can be
seen in the next paragraph. 1
The Community Center Task Force proceeded during the summer/fall
of 1988 in preparing two alternative community center
configurations/sites. On January 9 , 1989 , both of the concepts II
were presented to the Chanhassen City Council . It was the posi-
tion of the Council that each of these two plans should be taken
II
11
•
II is
Mr. Peter Beck
IIJanuary 12 , 1989
Page 2
Iback into the community to seek public input. In recognition of
the fact that the item would be taken to the community, I need to
I be in a position of assuring potential audiences that the Lake
Ann (Eckankar property) is in fact a reasonable alternative. I
am fearful that I may get all the way through the process and
find that I have not properly communicated our desires to repre-
I sentatives of Eckankar or that I had not properly understood the
financial considerations. Accordingly, I would ask that you for-
ward this letter to the representatives with which you had pre-
Iviously received approval from.
I see no necessity to enter into a formal option agreement or to
I even further define the specific costs more so than outlined
above. As this still represents an initial planning stage, I
think that simply a letter from Eckankar which would acknowledge
that this letter represents the previous and current thoughts of
I the church. They may wish to see changes to this letter occur
before confirming their position. I would be more than willing
to redraft this to a format more desirable. I also stand ready
to either meet or discuss the City' s position in further detail .
I would prefer ending this letter at this point; however, in
fairness to my Community Center Task Force members , I cannot. As
I mentioned earlier, two sites have been identified for potential
location of the community center, 1 ) A site adjoining the
existing Chanhassen Elementary buildings; and 2 ) The Eckankar
I prop-erty adjacent to Lake Ann . The school property has the
benefit of allowing the community center to be attached to the
existing elementary school buildings and, accordingly, increase
I both the usage of the City as well as the school , i.e. sharing of_
gym, restrooms, cafeteria , etc. While there are many high
school/middle schools which have availability of a swimming pool
in their complex, there are virtually no elementary schools
I having this level of service. Again , the idea is intriguing to
the School District. Of concern is the restrictive size of the
parcel and the necessity to introduce buildings/hard surfaced
I areas into current play areas . The next growth need for our
school district is a middle school. One of the suggestions by
committee members was to incorporate the concepts being con-
sidered at the elementary school into a middle school complex -
I all of which being located at Lake Ann (Eckankar property) . The
idea was discussed with school officials and significant cost
savings could occur for both the City and School if such was
I developed as a joint venture. Of concern is the fact that a
minimum of 25 acres would be required for the combined community
center/middle school complex.
IDo you know what the church ' s reaction to this type of a proposal
would be? I think it is fair to state that if this latter --
request were to in any way jeopardize the first request, it would
Ibe quickly withdrawn.
I
Mr. Peter Beck
January 12 , 1989
Page 3
Thank you again for acting as an intermediary for us. '
Sincerely, 1
C ,
Don Ashworth
City Manager 1
DA:k
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
I
I ,
k4(1 Li
Ankeny
111 Richter
Kell
.:, ;;;;.--, ' R_ ,.., ,
&
ei-4,--f--- . Associates
BARKER-RINKER-SEACAT
: ,,,*1:•:;:q1..:!:•••, :
- & PARTNERS, P.C.
1
--•-m;4 _ f;4 ..
-4
4. :',•-...-,,,,,i-
•
if . _
CHASKA COMMUNITY CENTER
SPACE PROGRAM &.
-:: ,.-:ki,•:- '4;,,';„,'-
COMPONENTS ANALYSIS
JANUARY 17, 1989
._-,„•_ ,. ,
i .
1 .
. _
115
11 .
i -
1111— Architecture
Planning
821 Raymond Ave.Suite 400
. St.Paul,Minnesota 55114
612.6454806
I
I- TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
Task Force Recommendation 1 1
I- Components Analysis Summary 2 1
r Purpose Statement 4
I
Components Relationship Diagram 5
I
I
I Components Analysis 6
1
Aquatic Area 7
Fitness/Dance 10
1
Strength & Conditioning 12
I Exercise Machines 14
I
Gymnasiums 16
' Racquet Ball 20
Running/Walking Track 22
Community/Arts Rm 24
C Kitchen 26
I
Child Care 28
[ Wet& Dry Crafts 30 •
Ice Arena 32 I
L Offices 35
Lobby 37 1
L Reception 39
Lounge 41
I
L Refreshments _ _ 43
Locker Rooms 45
I
Toilets 47
L
I
Appendix 1 - Construction Budget Cost 49
[ Appendix 2- Community Center Operational Analysis 51
1
[
I
L
1
lir
Community Center Advisory Committee
January 12, 1989
Chaska City Council
Dear Council Member:
lirThis letter is a very brief introduction to the recommendation process
followed by the citizen's advisory committee.
Over the past several months, our committee has met to evaluate the informa-
tion available and to reach the recommendations which are before you. Initially,
our committee reviewed information pertaining to other recreational facilities
including a slide show of other work in which the architects have been involved,
information presented by Mr. Redman regarding local community centers and general
information from across the country.
The committee then scheduled a meeting with each user group to allow the user
groups to present information regarding their specific topic of interest. Mr.
Redman had communicated with these user groups prior to their presentation to us
so they were familiar with the information we were looking for.
The information presented by the user groups was concise and thorough. Many
groups actually presented blueprints, specifications, cost factors and many other
considerations for our review. After each user group made it's presentation, the
committee entered a dialogue with them to answer general questions.
i
The committee then reviewed it's mission statement and reviewed the budget
which was initially 6.2 million dollars.
II The committee's discussions evolved with a consensus being that the top
priority and a major component of our community center should be to serve the
social/arts function of our city. It is our group's recommendation that the
community center should include a large wet and dry crafts area and a separate
_ community/arts room.
The community/arts room would be a large meeting room with a kitchen
i facility. This facility could serve for general meetings, wedding receptions,
r etc. In order to maximize the versatility of this room, it was also desirable to
create a stage area. Approximately 200 removable chairs could then be placed
within this room for seating for piano recitals, small theatre performances, etc.
It was also felt that the community center should have a child care facility for
th. watching of small children while the parents are able to use the community
cF +ter.
d:
i
I
1
II
Ir
II
Chaska City Council
I Page Two
January 12, 1989
I
ir The committee has also considered the need for a large auditorium within our
II
city. The location of such an auditorium has not yet been answered. Whether a new
facility is needed or a remodeled auditorium is sufficient, has not been deter-
mined. We are recommending the establishment of a designated fund with a minimum II of $250,000 as the seed money for such an auditorium. The architect has been
instructed to plan the community center to allow for its potential location at the
community center.
e
The committee then progressed on to review the recreational aspects of t he II
IL community center. The group unanimously felt that a field house component would
serve the greatest number of user groups and was also of the greatest need within
the City of Chaska. As such a field house is being proposed to include a fitness II
dance area, a strength and conditioning area, two racquetball courts and a large
I running track. There would also be two gymnasiums which can be divided into five
volleyball courts or a wrestling and gymnastics area. I
Irr Based upon the initial budget constraints of 6.2 million dollars, it was
impossible for the committee to include both a water and ice component in the
first phase as the available 6.2 million would not allow for it. The committee II
hoped to see both components built within the community center. It was therefore
Iof great interest to the committee to learn that based upon recently confirmed II financing options the community center's budget could expand to 8.2 million
dollars.
I After meetings with Mr. Pokorney, who explained the tax increment financing II process to us, it was a consensus of the committee to recommend to this city
council to expend the budget to 8.2 million dollars. The committee recognizes the
IL large sum of money involved, but sincerely believes that the opportunity and the .;
creative financing available justify the increase. I
I_ Given the opportunity to include both the water and ice functions within the
community center, the committee recommends including both components within the
II
initial construction. As such, the ice component can now be included within the
Lfirst phase.
This ice component would include an ice sheet which can be used for many II
activities articulated within the ice user group's material . The ice component
would have the future seating ability for 500 people. The goal is to have the
sheet of ice built with a covered, heated structure. Some of the amenities such
II
as bleachers, etc. may need to be added at a later point when monies allow.
LIn regard to the water component, a leisure pool is being proposed rather
than a competition pool. I believe the council is aware of the leisure pool II
1 concept based upon the previous slide presentations of the architects. This pool
would cater to people of all ages involving play aparatus, shallow areas for small
children and swim instruction, sloped access for the handicapped, warmer tempera-
tures for more comfortable water recreation, a whirlpool and other attributes.
I
II
t
II
II
If
Chaska City Council
If Page Three
January 12, 1989 .
lir It is the committee's expectation to continue to move forward in working with
the architects to further delineate construction costs, square footage require-
ments and develop the initial drawings for use by this council and any future
lirsurvey which may be needed.
The committee unanimously recommends the general budget which is submitted
within this packet. We urge the council to review the recommendation and to work
toward the creation of this community center. We anticipate financing actions are
necessary and further involvement with our committee will be needed.
IfThis letter is a very brief summary of the detailed work performed by the
committee. I look forward to making an oral presentation to the council regarding
the committee's work.
Respectfully submitted,
i pN—cl.,--1.1/4.0 l'h0-4-')".":)
Marsh J. Halberg
II Committee Chairman
MJH:tjh
I
II
li/
I
i[ _
t
IF
I
II
r
I
CHASKA COMMUNITY CENTER
COMPONENTS ANALYSIS JANUARY 11,1989
IPRIORITY ONE&TWO COMPONENTS
.
L ACTIVITY SQ. FT. CONST. CONST. OPERATING OPERATING OPERATING
COST/ COST REVENUE EXPENSE EXPENSE I
SQ. FT. PROGRAM FIXED
s `f WATER
AQUATIC AREA 12,000 $122.08 $1,465,000 $200,000 $200,000 $72,000 I
FIELD HOUSE
I FITNESS/DANCE 1,200 $70.00 $84,000 $12,000 $10,000
1,200 $70.00 $84,000 $7,200
STRENGTH&CONDIT. $7,200
I
EXERCISE MACHINES 600 $70.00 $42,000 $3,600
I GYMNASIUMS 15,200 $75.00 $1,140,000 $35,000 $30,000 $91,200
RACQUET BALL 1,600 $75.00 $120,000 $36,000 $500 $9,600
RUN/WALK TRACK 4,000 $20.00 $80,000 $24,000
SOCIAL
COMMUNITY/ARTS RM 3,600 $75.00 $270,000 $22,000 $21,600
I. STAGE AREA
KITCHEN 450 $70.00 $31,500 $1,800
600 $70.00 $42,000 $2,400
I
CHILD CARE 900 $70.00 $63,000 $5,400
ARTS
WET&DRYCRAFTS 1,800 $70.00 $126,000 $20,000 $20,000 $10,800
ICE
I
ICE ARENA 28,800 $52.78 $1,520,000 $190,000 $20,000 $172,000
OFFICES
OFFICES
GENERAL BUILDING 2,500 $70.00 $175,000 $15,000 $15,000
I
ENTRY LOBBY 1,000 $70.00 $70,000 $6,000
iRECEPTION 300 $70.00 $21,000 $1,800
LOUNGE 1,500 $70.00 $105,000 $9,000
REFRESHMENTS 100 $70.00 $7,000 $30,000 $20,000 $600 I
LOCKERS ROOMS 3,000 $85.00 $255,000 $18,000
1 STORAGE 1,200 $50.00 $60,000 $7,200
TOILETS 400 $70.00 $28,000 $2,400 - I
MEMBERSHIPS $140,000
I TOTAL NET 81,950 $70.63 $5,788,500 $700,000 $300,500 $488,800
I
NET/GROSS FACTOR 9,036 17.00% $725,645
BUILDING TOTAL 90,986 $71.60 $6,514,145
1
SITE /DEV. COSTS 22.00% $1,433,112
PROJECT TOTALS 90,986 $87.35 $7,947,257 $700,000 $300,500 $488,800 I
DESIGNATED FUNDS FOR THEATER $250,000
i_
GRAND TOTAL $8,197,257 $89,300 OPERATING DEFICIT
L THE ABOVE NUMBERS ARE BUDGET ESTIMATES AND
SHOULD BE USED FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES ONLY
I
2 1
j
CHASKA COMMUNITY CENTER
COMPONENTS ANALYSIS
Activity-Square Feet
The numbers are net square foot estimates which are further defined in the accompanying
individual component descriptions.
Activity-Cost per Square Foot
The cost per square foot is the construction budget cost estimate for each component including
finishes. Further details are included in Appendix 1 and are based on current 1989 dollars.
Activity- Operating Revenue
The revenue which can be attributed to each activity such as admission fees, room rental, and
sales, etc.
Activity- Operating Expense Program
The expenses associated with a specific activity to generate revenue such as staffing of
instructors, lifeguards, and any equipment or costs of supplies which would be billed against
Revenue.
Activity- Operating Expense Fixed
This figure is based on a square foot basis of$6.00 per net square foot. The numbers are based
on the historical data contained in Appendix 2 with adjustments for the Chaska situation.
Included in fixed expense are:
Utilities: Gas, electric, and water expenses @ $1.85 per s.f.
Contractural Services and Supplies: Building supplies, promotional expenses, advertising,
telephone, contractural maintenance, mileage, and all other expenses exclusive of staffing and
utilities to manage the facility @$1.80 per s.f.
Staffing:All permanent and part time staff and benefits to manage the facility @ $2.35 per s.f.
_, Net/Gross Factor
The 17%of the building net, excluding ice, includes area for circulation, mechanical and electrical
equipment, stairs, elevators and wall thickness, etc.
Site Development Costs
The 22%of the total building costs allows for:
4% furniture and equipment
8%Architect and Engineer fees
2% Other fees
8%Site costs which include parking, grading, utilities, and landscaping.
Ice Arena Construction Costs
The construction costs allocated to the ice arena do not allow for the construction of all interior -
finishes such as bleachers, dasher boards, lockers, and equipment.
3
f .
1
1 PURPOSE STATEMENT 1
"TO PROVIDE THE CITIZENS OF CHASKA A COMPREHENSIVE MULTI-
PURPOSE CENTER WHICH RESPONDS TO THEIR RECREATION, SOCIAL I
AND CULTURAL NEEDS."
1 Areas of program response to these needs: - I
Ii. Sports/Games
r 2. Health/Wellness
3. Cultural/Educational I
I 4. Socialization
5. Social Services I
Some of the design objectives and criteria that the center is to respond to are:
I 1. The overall emphasis of the center shall
be a multi-purpose facility, I
serving the total Chaska Community, with the program stressing
I. "community" and not "sports competition".
2. The center
I
e ce to will work with and compliment other community facilities and
1
programs.
i
3. Flexibility of space usage. Where possible, spaces sh ou l d be able to
I respond to a variety of uses and allow for future programs and
expansion.
4. Energy efficient, with ease of maintenance and economical operating
costs.
I
1 5. A quality building, that will be a source of pride for Chaska's citizens
for years to come.
I
6. A warm, friendly and delightful place.
7. Accessibili ty for "special population" persons. I
1.
[ I
I
L
I
L
I
L 4
I
11- CHASKA COMMUNITY
ii RECREATION CENTER
GYMNASIUMS
IL '
it I RUNNING/
j I WALKING ,
It I TRACK
I�
( BALL RACQUET 1
J r \ /
FITNESS/ j
DANCE/ - LOCKERS
WRESTLING
it (STRENGTH l � J
COND. J AQUATICS
� 1 / (EXERCISE �, AREA
PARKS MACHINES
& REC. - J
■STAFF J i
ICE ARENA � ( FOOD )i
COMM.\ RECEPTION � �
EDUC. \ / \
STAFF
i LOUNGE/
GAME
' �- J TOILET, p,REp,
R0I k OMB /
J /
r
LOBBY 1 WET &
J ENTRY/ DRY
LOBBY CRAFTS
I/ ' iif i,„_____ \ (0.___Th
i\i
COMMUNITY/ 1 �-\ / ARTS - KITCHEN
i CARE
PARKING CHILD STAGE / MEETING \ J
` 5
1 I
SPACE: Aquatics Area
I
I . I
ACTIVITIES CHECKLIST
Adults playing with adults ZONE 0 Public
Kids playing with kids Semi—Public
Adults playing with kids Restricted `
Swimming lessons FLEXIBILITY Expandability
Lap swim and conditioning for all ages 0 Versatility
I
Handicapped programs None
t SUPERVISION 0 Required
Moderate I
None
IVIEW OUT 0 Desirable
Optional I
I
None
VIEW IN 0 Desirable
I
Optional
I None
ILLUMINATION Q Bright
Moderate
tSpecial
Q Flexible 1
FURNITURE/EQUIPMENT Q Natural
NOISE Q Required
I
Lifeguard chairs CONTROL None
Life safety and first aid equipment VENTILATION/ 0 High
Pool maintenance & equipment CLIMATE Normal
D
I
eck furniture CONTROL
Recreational slide(s) Q Special
Handicapped ramp
I
P.A./Sound system
Bubblers, fountains, sprays
NOTES
Povide direct access to &
j from locker rooms.
umidity control and
I
acoustic buffering.
Ceiling height: 1 6'0" to
l 24'0"
Provide accessible storage
L for recreational and
pool maintenance equip. I
L 8
1
T-
IP
of
r......,w-....
wrilAr,
S'ovii1-11,450,,,,,,„..,N4•
110- ,...„..,..arr
sy. 1
V 4. ■
\ 4‘+ . .
■
,, .....
,_ - --' -51.11m.
Ilf ) • 'Ilk,t..
A110 '
•"*- kliZ-117M.111
/
,
it
— ...
111 \•.......r..• •
' - t .. • t 6tICE.51r4R.
A ..,,,.
mopodo..e7f,„ 4., •••■•••io_ -_,, ' 1 I t .'.—",1\
4‘ ' 1111.2tArau: i ""711 ''uitt
I.' .17"11F -xim.-Arr I 1/4*
;,.yck:six. Fovas pingam -
lif .
i . Ileokiik Re■
r/iett . ,.....
., . .
. — -
. ,
iii 0_641 7
■• ' ' -As'' , •
I
rtrbs.4•■
. • -.
I.t 4.0111110k. .
-?
! . - ..
111, III . . ,
.-•
_
..;.:*
I
-. .i •
, r
i .
. . ,
111- . rtvPica. . i
7M5
. .
• ,••
C.46t,■,_.--
• I - '
ir:......." .,..., ,,_ l_, '. We 1,WW,Gi .••■%.
r"fliNki:4111t1
i •iii.,,'1,...;4704 •
< -
I
-75 1--
,
ik.
111-
Ai4.0-A-rrics . Asike-Er=bv —. 120a21 IF . .
i
1 9
I FITNESS/DANCE 1 , 200 SF II
I 1
This space is to be a general exercise room for the teaching of aerobics, dance,
I fitness and toning classes. Its design should encourage exercise and should allow I
total freedom of movement for its users. In light of the objective to encourage activity,
the integration of natural light and fresh air is desirable. Attention should also be paid
It to the maintenance of a sense of privacy for class participants.
I
I 1
I I
I I
I I
I
ADJACENCIES
F 1
1 1
1 r
1
t. I
C
STORAGE
FITNESS
DANCE LOCKERS
I
T
1. 1
I_ I
I
C
L RECEPTION I
L \... ____}
1
. .
L10 1
t :
or- SPACE: Fitness/Dance
I
Iii ACTIVITIES CHECKLIST
Aerobics classes ZONE Public
Dance classes 0 Semi—Public
General fitness classes Restricted
FLEXIBILITY Expandability
lir Q Versatility
None
SUPERVISION 0 Required
Moderate
None
I VIEW OUT 0 Desirable
Optional
None
VIEW IN Desirable
Q Optional
None
ILLUMINATION Q Bright
Moderate
Special
Flexible
FURNITURE/EQUIPMENT Q Natural
NOISE 0 Required
Dance bars CONTROL None
Mirrors VENTILATION/ 0 High
j Bench seating CLIMATE
Piano (?) CONTROL Normal
PA/sound system _ _Special
mi-
independent volume controls
NOTES
Provide floating wood
floor
i _
I
i 11
r -
STRENGTH CONDITIONING • /
1 , 200 SF
1
This room will be a high activity area. Due to the type of the equipment and the
I popularity of the exercise it is designed to promote, it is anticipated that the room will
receive heavy traffic from Community Center users. As such, it should have a bright,
open feeling.
The room should be located and designed in such a manner as to allow for visual
overview by staff. Equipment theft is a concern and safety supervision is a
requirement.
1
I
1
i
ADJACENCIES
1
STRENGTH LOCKERS
CONDITIONIN - `
1
1
L
I
L. RECEPTION
12
1
1
I SPACE: Strength Conditioning
I
ACTIVITIES CHECKLIST
Strength conditioning with machines ZONE Public
II Weight lifting with free weights 0 Semi—Public
Restricted
FLEXIBILITY Expandability
IlfQ Versatility
None
I SUPERVISION Q Required
Moderate
None
I VIEW OUT O Desirable
Optional
None
VIEW IN 0 Desirable
Optional
I
None
ILLUMINATION 0 Bright
Moderate
g Special
Flexible
FURNITURE/EQUIPMENT Natural
NOISE Required
Weight machines CONTROL None
Free weights VENTILATION/ 0 High
Mirrors CLIMATE Normal
PA/sound system CONTROL
independent volume controls Special
1-
1 NOTES
Provide impact resistant
jfinish materials
I
1- 13
I EXERCISE MACHINES AREA 1
600 SF
1
1
This space is for stationary exercise machines.
Views of other activity is desirable. This area does not necessarily need to be a
separate room. It could be ancillary to another use area.
I 1
r 1
I 1
[ 1
I 1
ADJACENCIES
1
1
L. 1
EXERCISE
MACHINES - - - LOCKERS
L 1
RECEPTION 1
L 1
L 14 1
II
SPACE: Exercise Machines Area
ACTIVITIES CHECKLIST
Stationary exercise ZONE Public
i 0 Semi—Public
Restricted
FLEXIBILITY Expandability
If Q Versatility
None
o e
I SUPERVISION 0 Required
Moderate
None
VIEW OUT 0 Desirable
Optional
None
i VIEW IN 0 Desirable
Optional
None
ILLUMINATION 0 Bright
Moderate
I Special
Flexible
FURNITURE/EQUIPMENT Natural
NOISE 0 Required '
CONTROL None
Exercise machines
VENTILATION/ 0 High
CLIMATE Normal
CONTROL
Special
I
i NOTES
Coordinate many
electrical outlets for
i machines.
I
1 15
I .
GYMNASIUMS 15,200 SF
II
1 1
The gymnasium space should be provided in two separate rooms, accommodating a
Iminimum of two basketball courts and four volleyball courts. As with most traditional I
gymnasiums, this should be an extremely versatile, flexible space. The activities taking
place within this room will range from tennis and badminton to basketball and
Ivolleyball. They will also include spectator viewing, lectures, dances and assemblies.
As this is one of the primary activity areas, it should occupy a position of prominence
I and visibility within the Center. Due to the nature of the activities planned for this
space, attention should be paid to acoustic isolation and buffering of the gymnasium.
I
Special attention should also be paid to the acoustic qualities within the space itself.
I
I I
I I
I I
ADJACENCIES
1
I I
1 ..
I
I.. I
STORAGE LOCKERS
i___ GYMNASIUMS
1_
I
I I
[- RECEPTION I
L 1
L 16
1
SPACE: Gymnasiums
II
I
ACTIVITIES CHECKLIST
Basketball ZONE 0 Public
I Volleyball Semi—Public
Badminton Restricted
Wrestling FLEXIBILITY 0 Expandability
Gymnastics
Tennis 0 Versatility
Assembly None
I Dancing SUPERVISION Required
Observation Q Moderate
None
i VIEW OUT Desirable
0 Optional
None
i VIEW IN 0 , Desirable
Optional
II None
ILLUMINATION 0 Bright
Moderate
iSpecial
FURNITURE/EQUIPMENT Natura�
8 retractable basketball backboards NOISE 0 Required
CONTROL None
4-5 volleyball nets and stands VENTILATION/ 0 High
I 1 tennis net and stands CLIMATE
4-5 badminton nets and stands CONTROL Normal
Wall safety mats - Q _Special
Exercise mats
Gymnastics equipment
Wrestling mats NOTES
Room curtain dividers
Portable bleacher seating for 200
P.A./Sound system Acoustics important
j Ceiling height-24'0" min.
Wood flooring
Provide adequate storage
I
i
t , ,
I17
1 ' 11 ,kc,-; / 1
I - .,
. . , 21'
1 1 I
1 -
t. U r,'
..,N. _,,:, 1
( .--k \ j 0 (.---ri: ---\ ,
I
I
v_
1 -1--/ i 2
j WL 9 1
N. ,_
g1
I -may , s. 3 1
I �
I
I_ ; 7
It -`i 1
; , I
, I I ,-
, \
1
I_ s 1 1' , 1 1
I. ! , 1
t t El ,
\ P i'. II, 1
! I
.---,_, „ 1 1E--" 2 ' >{ -' 1
, 1 1 1 i i . i WI
' I 1 ' �1 ,. , 1 i QI
L \.__ ..../ I
I ; � ' I w �I CC
L
� L -� J
1 ` Q ,.c.'
L f ii 1
( 1-p 11
L 18 1
i1 - f 1
e I
g i 2 i'
I
ioi _ k g
I X
II X
� 3 N2
...CNI AC I- N
if
p 0 1-
N � 4v '�
i }`
I cil A
i 1 ./
. b
II V
I.
111- -
a >
W
Q
Z
i- "o cc
ek.-;-(
x
06 A.V 1NtT2s 1'f 1*\ _
1 \ j:
-I f
147" 19
i :
I
RACQUET COURTS IOO SF
1
There are to be two regulation sized racquetball courts. These should be versatile
enough to also accommodate handball, wallyball, modified squash, wall tennis and the
I
teaching of classes. At least one of the Courts should incorporate a glass backwall.
This feature, combined with the potential for an upper level observation deck, would
promote teaching and encourage spectator viewing.
I
I 1
1
I 1
t 1
I 1
1 ADJACENCIES
•
i
1 (OBSERVATION ) i
I C - 1
C 4\
1
RACQUET LOCKERS
COURTS 1
L i
I_ 1
J
1 ... 1 1
r
[. RECEPTION 1
L J
1
L 20
1
if
SPACE: Racquet Courts
1 ,
ACTIVITIES CHECKLIST
Racquetball ZONE Public
If Handball
0 Semi—Public
Wall tennis Restricted
Modified squash FLEXIBILITY Expandability
Walleyball
Teaching/classes
0 Versatility
None
SUPERVISION Required
Q Moderate
None
i VIEW OUT Desirable
Q Optional
None
i VIEW IN 0 Desirable
Optional
None
ILLUMINATION 0 Bright
Moderate
I Special
Flexible
FURNITURE/EQUIPMENT Natural
NOISE 0 Required
Glass backwall for 1 to 3 courts CONTROL None
Walleyball/tennis nets and attachments VENTILATION/ High
Spectator seating CLIMATE • Normal
Wall, floor, ceiling panel system CONTROL
t , _
Special
II— NOTES
Light fixtures should be
j cost effective for
frequent on/off cycles
Ceiling height: 20'-0"
I
I
II. 21
1 I
RUNNING / WALKING TRACK 4 , 000 SF
1 1
The running/walking track is to be an active recreation space for running, jogging,
I walking and stretching. The atmosphere created within this space should be light and
I
airy. It should encourage exertion, relaxation and exercise. The design should provide
the user with captured views of adjacent interior activity spaces and framed views of
exterior vistas.
I
I I
I I
I I
I
i
1 .
I
ADJACENCIES
1
RUNNING / WALKING TRACK
I I
1 1
_ 1 1 1
1 1
I.._ 1 1 1 1
I
1 1
1
L 1 RECEPTION LOCKERS 1 I
1 1
II E__ 1 1
1 1 - '
1 1
' 1
1
I
1 1
!._.
1
t_ 22
1
11
SPACE: Running / Walking Track
ii
II I ACTIVITIES CHECKLIST
Running ZONE 0 Public
if Walking Semi—Public
Stretching Restricted
Viewing/observation of other activities FLEXIBILITY Expandability
Q Versatility
None
III SUPERVISION Required
0 Moderate
None
VIEW OUT 0 Desirable
Optional
None
i . VIEW IN Desirable
0 Optional
None
It , , ILLUMINATION Bright
Q Moderate
Special
Flexible
FURNITURE/EQUIPMENT Q Natural
Stretching/exercise equipment NOISE Q Required CONTROL None
Timing clock VENTILATION/ • High
Distance markers CLIMATE
li
Direction of travel markers CONTROL Normal
Lane striping _ Special
Benches for resting
NOTES .
Dedicated stretching area
t to ensure freedom of
movement for runners/
walkers.
Min. width: 8'-0"
j 23
1 I
COMMUNITY/ARTS ROOM 4 , 050 SF
[ I
This is to be a large multi-purpose space utilized for a variety of group activities
I including dining, dancing, receptions, performances, lectures, conferences and fitness.
It should be a large, uninterrupted space with the flexibility to be subdivided into three
to four smaller rooms. In a room of this size, particular attention should be paid to
I items which contribute spatial interest and variety. Choice of finish materials, ceiling
heights and the play of light all contribute to the success of the experience. I
Acoustic quality is a chief concern in a room of this type. Floor, wall and ceiling
materials, type and quality of operable partitions, ceiling heights, scheduling of
activities, etc. will all affect the room's acoustic performance. It is important to note
there will be compromises in acoustic quality due to the multi-purpose nature of the
lspace. I
The space should include a fixed raised stage to accomodate use by the performing
Ir arts.
ill
Within the room itself, all spaces should have access to bulk table and chair storage.
The room should have a direct relationship to the kitchen.
I
I 1
ADJACENCIES
1
1 r
ENTRY/ LOUNGE
LOBBY /
\ J //
e 1 i/
c ■
I
L COMMUNITY/ STAGE
ARTS 1
ROOM i
•
I\
L c ,'
I
i
TOILET KITCHEN
ROOMS
\ J STORAGE \ J
L i
L 24
If
gSPACE: Community/Arts Room
i ACTIVITIES CHECKLIST
Dining ZONE 0 Public
Dancing
0 Semi—Public
Meetings/Assembly Restricted
Movies FLEXIBILITY Q Expandability
It Plays
Concerts 0 Versatility
Bazaars None
Classes SUPERVISION Required
Lectures Q Moderate
Conferences None
I Receptions
Fitness classes VIEW OUT 0 Desirable
Optional
None
• VIEW IN
0 Desirable
Optional
It
None
ILLUMINATION Bright
Moderate
0 Special
FURNITURE/EQUIPMENT Q Flexible
Natural
8 Required
Stackable chairs NOISE
CONTROL None
t Folding tables VENTILATION/ 0 High
Portable Stage CLIMATE Normal
P.A./Sound System CONTROL
Piano
electric outlets
Raised stage 15'x30'
11 NOTES .
Ceiling height set at
12'0" to 16'0".
Wood flooring preferable
Operable partitions
Outside windows with nice
views.
I
I25
I KITCHEN . 1
600 SF
I , 1
Less than commercial/more than residential. Adequate counters, scullery,
I- refrigeration, and cook top space for caterers and pot luck functions. I
I '
I '
I '
1
I 1
I • 1
ADJACENCIES
I 1
COMMUNITY ARTS ROOM
1_
L '
KITCHEN
I
L I
I
L r
26
1
If ,
SPACE: Kitchen
IF
lif ACTIVITIES CHECKLIST
Full meal preparation and clean—up ZONE Public
Possible rental facility Semi—Public
ICoffee and snack preparation Q Restricted
Administrative tasks by kitchen staff FLEXIBILITY Expandability
Q Versatility
None
SUPERVISION 0 Required
le Moderate
None
VIEW OUT Q Desirable
Optional
None
0 • VIEW IN Q Desirable
Optional
None
ILLUMINATION Q Bright
Moderate
i $ Special
Q Flexible
FURNITURE/EQUIPMENT Natural
Stove and range with vent hood NOISE 0 Required
CONTROL None
Dishwashing/pot scrubbing equipment VENTILATION/ 0 High
j Refrigerator/Freezer CLIMATE
Microwave oven CONTROL Normal
Serving line/pass through Q Special
Food and kitchen supplies storage
NOTES
•
i
I
I
j 27
CHILD CARE 900 SF
. 1
I , 1
L This is to p p
center activities be a and play space prografor msthe. It should care of small mchildren encompass two to while three arents distinct activity articipate in areas
I
and should be designed with special attention to a child's perspective on the world.
Window sills, countertops, tables and chairs should be scaled to match a child's height
and frame. Elements of surprise and whimsy should be introduced to contribute to a
I
child's joy of discovery. Interior finish materials should be playful and colorful.
[ The child care area should be located directly adjacent to an outdoor play area. This
I
play yard should be completely enclosed, with access to and from controlled through
the classroom. Ideally, the outdoor play area should be oriented to maximize sun
1 exposure and increase off-season usability. i
I 1
1
1 1
ADJACENCIES
1
1 1
I.. ,, 1
STORAGE C 1 /
1
I_ .. .: .
CHILD LOBBY 1
CARE
L CHILD'S
1
L TOILETS 1
L
L i
L 28 1
IF •
'I SPACE: Child Care
if .
If ACTIVITIES CHECKLIST
Children's Play and activities ZONE Public
it Outdoor play 0 Semi—Public
Restricted
FLEXIBILITY Expandability
it O Versatility
None
SUPERVISION 0 Required
ii Moderate
None
VIEW OUT 0 Desirable
Optional
None
II VIEW IN Desirable
0 Optional
None
ILLUMINATION O Bright
Moderate .
ISpecial
FURNITURE/EQUIPMENT O Natural
ifTables and choirs for children and NOISE • Required CONTROL None
11 teachers VENTILATION/ High
Cubbies/children's storage bins CLIMATE
Coat racks for children CONTROL 0 Normal
Children's scale restroom with WC Special
111- and lavatory
Sink and countertop at children's height
Bulletin boards/tack surfaces
Chalk boards/writing surfaces NOTES
Sleeping mats
Interior and exterior play equipment Provide adjacent exterior
t Television play area
Easily maintained
finish materials
I-
29
if
' 1
I WET 8c DRY CRAFTS 1 , 800 SF
T
1
i , This expanded classroom is to be utilized as a teaching area for wet and dry crafts. It
Iwill receive heavy traffic by participants for classes ranging from ceramics and pottery
to painting and fly tying. These rooms should be arranged to maximize versatility and 1
efficiency. Storage spaces may be shared.
I 1
I 1
I I
I i
I I
I- 1
ADJACENCIES
i
[ WET 1
C RAFTS
1
1
I LOBBY STORAGE
I
I
[ DRY .
CRAFTS I
L 1
I=
I
L 1
L 30
•
SPACE: Wet & Dry Crafts
i .
t ACTIVITIES CHECKLIST
WET: ZONE Public
10 Ceramics 0 Semi—Public
Pottery Restricted
Painting FLEXIBILITY Expandability
0 Versatility
DRY: None
Leather works
Drawing SUPERVISION Required
Painting Q Moderate
Fiber work None
Needle work VIEW OUT Desirable
Wood crafts Q Optional
Paper crafts None
Fly tying
Slide presentations VIEW IN Desirable
0 Optional
None
ILLUMINATION Q Bright
Moderate
Special
FURNITURE/EQUIPMENT Q Flexible
Notural
i___
NOISE Required
Stackable Chairs CONTROL None
Tables VENTILATION/ High
Slop sinks with clay traps CLIMATE Q Normal
Kilns CONTROL
Pottery wheels , Q Special
Easels
Display cases
Bulletin boards/tack surfaces NOTES •
Pull—down AV screen Easily maintained finish
materials. SF includes 2
Easels classrooms at 900 SF
Quilting racks each.
Specialized storage shelving and Provide sufficient storage
cabinetry space.
Attention to specialty task
lighting requirements
Provide additional elec.
outlets and 220 power
i . 31
1 ICE ARENA 28 , 800 SF
1 I
1. Ts inul o lobby and entrance. It s ' x
eating he ce for are 1500 a sho. It d should have include its wn ticket booth, offices, toilets hould, dressing be 120r ooms240' with
zamboni room and provide necessary equipment for competitive hockey. The facility I
should accommodate figure skating and open skating as well as hockey. The
potential of multi-purpose use in the summer such as roller skating, indoor soccer, or I
trade show type functions should be considered.
I
I
I I
I I
I
1,
i
ADJACENCIES
I
•
MAINTENANCE .
1
1 1 / 1
DRESSING SCE STORAGE
I
I. ARENA
I
I L J
1.._
... J
t
ICONCESSIO (TOILET
j I
ROOMS
L
CLOBBY
L ..
L 32
IT
If s
SPACE: Ice Arena
If ACTIVITIES CHECKLIST
Hockey ZONE 0 Public
II Figure skating Semi—Public
Broomball Restricted
Open skating FLEXIBILITY Expandability
' 0 Versatility
None
SUPERVISION 0 Required
ii Moderate
None
11 VIEW OUT Desirable
0 Optional
None
VIEW IN 0 Desirable
Optional
None
0_
ILLUMINATION 0 Bright
Moderate
•
j Special
Flexible
FURNITURE/EQUIPMENT Natural
Illi NOISE 0 Required
CONTROL None
Ilf Telescoping seating for 500 VENTILATION/ High
Timing & score boards CLIMATE
Hockey rink set up CONTROL Normal
Q Special
NOTES
Potential for heat
exchange from ice
makers to heat pool
i , 5 ,
33.
I f' ,, L t f
- 1
, .1/4
I
r _,
I
I I,___
0 0 �1
t
I _
--:—., I
i ..
;I
.,--
--/—
, ✓ i z;
1 ,
tI
i \
I 4 v
1
I. .....,
-
v.). I
�L
r,
t -4-
,( ,.,— .
III
,Lt.'
. '...1
t
O -■-
a
T I
1
H 1
1
t 1 L • 1
4 t
L ,--
.1-,, q_ ti_ ,1_ \,; „, ,_± ____.
,,.
\._ .‘ I
,- ,,,, , , \11.÷. 1 \-- M 1 t I_ ,, , -?- i-cl—_- u A A •� 2 s v < 4 I
L <7- ,47., .00 .,3 ,c2, , 34. -±,ev S ' .4fr I
i
STAFF OFFICES 2 , 500 SF
The Staff Offices should serve the needs of both the Chaska Parks and Recreation
if staff and the School District Community Education staff. The Parks and Recreation
offices should include two offices for the facility management and two offices for
administration plus a secretarial space. The community education offices should
Iinclude six offices plus one secretarial space. They both will share a reception area,
conference room, and storage space. In addition, space for filing, first aid, and an
employee lounge should be integrated into the office layout.
The design of the staff offices should be open, airy and well lit. The spaces should be
flexible enough to accommodate changes in staffing patterns and numbers with grace.
- The atmosphere should contribute to a productive, creative work environment. Staff
members should have an overview of critical activity areas from their work stations.
II
1
i
ADJACENCIES
I . c.
i
11- PARKS &
RECREATION
STAFF RECEPTION
1-
1 �__ J
[CONFERENCE STAFF
RECEPTION
li -J J / 1
/ 1
COMMUNITY LOBBY
I EDUCATION
STAFF
J
I-
1 35
I .
SPACE: Staff Offices I
I
I ACTIVITIES CHECKLIST
I
Desk work/administrative tasks ZONE Public
1 1 Telephoning Semi—Pubic
Typing 0 Restricted 1
Small group meetings and conferences FLEXIBILITY 0 Expandability
I Coffee breaks I
0 Versatility
Waiting None
First aid administration
I SUPERVISION 0 Required
Moderate I
None
IVIEW OUT 0 Desirable 1
Optional
I None
VIEW IN 0 Desirable I
Optional
I None
ILLUMINATION 0 Bright
Moderate
t Special I
Flexible
FURNITURE/EQUIPMENT Natural
NOISE O Required
Desks and chairs CONTROL None I
1 Filing and storage equipment VENTILATION/ High
Central file system CLIMATE O Normal
Waiting area seating CONTROL
Business machinery Special L Computer terminals I
Audio—visual equipment storage
IP.A./Sound system NOTES
Coffee machine I
Microwave oven
First aid equipment Visual access to reception
Copy machine desk. I
Wall or floor safe
L I
L I
L 36
1
ENTRY / LOBBY 1 , 000 SF-
1
The main entry to the Community Center should be visible and distinguishable from
I the outside of the facility. It should extend a welcome to visitors and should begin to
set the tone for the activities which occur within. The entry should be open, bright and
airy. Ideally it should be south-facing, allowing for maximum sun and exposure.
IIA passenger drop-off zone should be provided near the entrance as well as close-in
parking for the handicapped.
it
II-
II
II
II
ADJACENCIES
11 c
RECEPTION FOOD
J ` /
if 1
if . 'N t
LOUNGE
LOBBY \ 1
li ICE ARENA
& AUDI. ENTRY/LOBBY
I
j
■ 1 CI
if TOILET
`ROOMS
1.
I-
1- 37
I ,
Hi
I SPACE: Entry / Lobby
I
I I
I ACTIVITIES CHECKLIST
0 Public
I
I Orientation ZONE
Display Semi—Public
Informal gathering Restricted
I
Viewing of activity areas FLEXIBILITY Expandability
Announcements/bulletins
O Versatility
I
None
I SUPERVISION 0 Required
Moderate
None I
VIEW OUT 0 Desirable
j Optional I
None
I VIEW IN 0 Desirable
I
Optional
None
ILLUMINATION 0 Bright
I
Moderate
I_ Special
Flexible I
FURNITURE/EQUIPMENT 0 Natural
1 NOISE 0 Required Display CONTROL None
Tack surfaces VENTILATION/ High
P.A./Sound system CLIMATE Normal I
Airlock entry CONTROL
O Special
1
1... NOTES .
I
Non—slip, easily
tmaintained floor material
I
I
L
1
. _
L 38
If RECEPTION 300 SF
The reception area should be directly adjacent to the entry lobby. From this position
I of prominence, it should serve as an information and control point for those entering
the Center. The design of the counter itself should reinforce one's sense of orientation
and aid one's understanding of the facility's organization.
The reception area should also serve as a base for staff operations. It should provide
the staff with an overview of those spaces requiring close supervision. The staff
should be able to run the Center smoothly and efficiently from this location.
I
I
I
i ,
ADJACENCIES
II I
LOCKER ROOMS RACQUET
BALL
J i
I 1
PARKS & r
RECREATION FITNESS/
I STAFF
1 DANCE
�_ 1
It RECEPTION STRENGTH
I COND.
I- COMMUNITY
EDUCATION _.
STAFF ` J ,_� RUN/ _j
WALK
I 1 / 1
ENTRY / LOBBY EXERCISE
MACHINES
I-
1- 39
I ' I
I SPACE: Reception
I
I I
_ ACTIVITIES CHECKLIST
Greeting ZONE 0 Public
I
I Orientation Semi—Public I
Check—in
Restricted
Locker assignment FLEXIBILITY Expandability
Money exchange
IEquipment check—out Q Versatility
Program and recreational activity None
sign—ups SUPERVISION Required
Announcements/bulletins Moderate
I
Retail sales None
t Visual control of activities
VIEW OUT 0 Desirable
Optional
None
VIEW IN 0 Desirable I
Optional
None
IILLUMINATION Q Bright
Moderate
ISpecial
Flexible
FURNITURE/EQUIPMENT 0 Natural
NOISE Q Required'
I
Reception counter CONTROL None
Public side at standing height
t Staff side at work desk height CL MA
ATE
0 High
Business machinery CONTROL Normal I
Computer terminal _Special
Key/ID storage
Lost and found storage
1
Display case/retail and crafts
LBulletin boards/tack surface NOTES 1
Equipment storage
ID Photo machine Allow room for lingering,
E check—in and registratior
I
1I
1
�_
40
1
LOUNGE / GAME AREA 1 , 500 SF
if
The lounge/game area provides a backdrop for a variety of activities: sitting,
If conversing, relaxing and observing, as well as, pool playing, ping pong, and electronic
games. As such, the environment within the lounge/game area should be
comfortable and inviting. Its atmosphere should encourage conversation and mingling.
It should be finished in a manner that is at once friendly, youthful, and durable. Color
selections, furnishing choices and placement, all combine to reinforce the users sense
of ease and community.
if The lounge/game area should be located in a position of high visibility. It should
provide opportunities for observation of many of the recreational activities within the
center.
i
i
I
i
ADJACENCIES 1 1
FOOD
I \ 1
i.
/ . . .t ENTR POOL
LOBBY I
\ J
1
GAME
AREA
C
i TOILET ,
ROOMS
\ .J
I
I.
i__ 41
SPACE: Lounge / Game Area
:1
, I
i
ACTIVITIES CHECKLIST
I I
f Sitting/informal gathering ZONE O Public
'I Pool viewing Semi—Public
Eating/drinking Restricted
I
Relaxing FLEXIBILITY Expandability
1 Display Q Versatility
Electronic games I
Pool/Billiards/Ping Pong None
1 Conversing, mingling SUPERVISION 0 Required
Q Moderate
I
None
I VIEW OUT 0 Desirable
Optional I
None
VIEW IN 0 Desirable I
Optional
1 None
t ILLUMINATION Q Bright
I
0 Moderate
1 Special
Q Flexible I
FURNITURE/EQUIPMENT Q Natural
I_ Upholstered lounge chairs and sofa(s) NOISE 0 Required'
s) CONTROL None I
Tables & chairs VENTILATION/ High
Bulletin board/tack surface CLIMATE 0 Normal
I
Display cases CONTROL
P.A./Sound system Special
J Pool tables I
Video games
Ping Pong table NOTES
I_ A
I
coustics buffering may
L be required
I___ I
L I
L 42
1
I REFRESHMENTS 100 SF
i
The refreshment area should house food and drink vending machines. The finishes
within this space should be bright, functional and easily maintained. For the
convenience of Center users, the vending machines should be accessible from the
lounge. Staff should be able to maintain visual control of this space from the reception
iarea. An alternative refreshment concept would be to provide a juice bar operated
from the reception area.
I1
I
I
I
11
ADJACENCIES
JL
I
L
IL
r_ FOOD
- - - POOL
I__
i
I- LOUNGE
1_ 43
Shell Cost Special Costs Sub Totals
19, 500 —
6, 000 25, 500
97, 500 97, 500 _
:HECKLIST
6,500 6, 500 IE 0 Public
Semi—Public
210, 000 Restricted
25, 000 KIBILITY Expandability
3 , 000 Versatility
50, 000 288 , 000 0 None
... ERVISION Required
28, 000 28, 000 O Moderate
None
5, 243 , 000 822 , 000 6, 065, 000 VII / OUT Desirable
Optional
0 None
VII* I IN Desirable
Optional
0 None
LL MINATION 0 Bright
Moderate
Special
Flexible
Natural
JC '.E 0 Required'
TROL None
ic. "ILATION/ 0 High
;L ATE Normal
n 1ROL
Special
rOTES
L 3ndicapped accessibility
Isily maintained,
mpervious wall, floor
Ind ceiling materials.
includes 2 at 200 SF
:ach
- I
50