Loading...
4. Feasibility Study for Improvements to Frontier Trail, Public Hearing I.__I 4 C I TY 0 F _._____ 1 1 cHANHAssEs ■ — . 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 I i (612) 937-1900 Action by CTY AdnifnIstrato- Endorsed, V LA 1 MEMORANDUM t1A0dif IEd TO: Don Ashworth , City Manager , r,,• .. /-11-4/- -11-� J I -" FROM: Gary Warren, City Engineer !Ate submitted to Gorntnl3sbl! bete Submrtied to tkuuttc* DATE: July 19 , 1989 -1-214---2- 4 I SUBJ: Accept Feasibility Study for Utility and Roadway Improvements to Frontier Trail from Highland Drive to I Kiowa Circle; Call Public Hearing File No. 89-10 I On April 10 , 1989 the City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility study for utility and roadway improvements to Frontier Trail from Highland Drive to Kiowa Circle. Attached is I the feasibility study as prepared by Bill Engelhardt for the City . I The project basically deals with three elements of improvements for this road segment, namely street reconstruction, sanitary sewer rehabilitation and storm sewer upgrading. The street reconstruction is relatively straightforward based on the City ' s I previous investigative work that has been done. Basically, due to the poor subgrade and lack of adequate drainage, the road is in need of total reconstruction. This is estimated to cost 1 $307 ,620 . The sanitary sewer and storm sewer upgrade is a little more sub- 1 jective at this point, namely since there are alternatives available for sanitary sewer rehabilitation which, if effective, can substantially reduce the financial commitment. Likewise, the amount of storm sewer and catch basins which may be necessary on I Frontier Trail will be thoroughly reviewed as a part of the design process . I At present, the feasibility study presents a worst case cost sce- nario for removing and replacing virtually all of the sanitary sewer underneath the pavement and extensive installation of storm sewer and catch basins throughout the roadway. The total project I cost estimate is $707 , 227 . If a sealing and testing repair program is possible for the sanitary sewer rehabilitation, approximately $170 , 000 can be eliminated from this program. In 11 all reality, I would expect that the construction plans and II ■ 1 Don Ashworth July 19 , 1989 Page 2 specifications would reflect a combination of sealing repairs and reconstruction . Rehabilitation of Kiowa Circle is also being proposed at this time to address the fact that sanitary sewer repairs are warranted for the sewer on Kiowa Circle which , if not done at this time, would necessitate excavating the upgraded Frontier Trail at some future date which obviously would not be wise. The storm sewer upgrade includes the construction of concrete barrier curb and gutter to better convey and handle the storm water drainage in the street section. The cost for barrier ver- sus surmountable curbing is relatively the same and since all the driveway curb cuts are known at this time it would be appropriate to construct barrier curbing in this road section. As a part of the preparation of plans and specifications, it would also be wise to address the infiltration/inflow contribu- tion which the City receives from properties in this general area due to foundation and/or sump pump drains connected to the sani- tary sewer system. The benefit of constructing an extensive storm sewer system would be to connect all foundation drains along this frontage to the storm sewer system. This will in all likelihood require building inspections to be performed to iden- tify the internal plumbing . City Ordinance (Section 19-44 ) requires that clear water sources of this nature not be discharged to the sanitary sewer system although this has been poorly enforced over the years due to various reasons. Assessment/funding scenarios are presented in the report. A review was conducted of several communities where street rehabi- , litation programs are an annual budget commitment to receive some idea as to what other communities are doing. The results of this investigation are contained in the report and basically show that it is somewhat subjective in nature. Although the assessment hearing, which will be conducted at the conclusion of the construction, is the forum where the assessment policy would be finalized , it has always been prudent and a preference of the City to deal with the assessment policies up front so that surprises do not arise at the hearing phase after the project has been completed. In that perspective, it appears that the 43% assessment scenario very closely approximates the increased road- way benefit being provided on this project. Likewise, utilizing the City ' s policy for storm sewer construction, 50% of the storm sewer would be assessed. Obviously, any work required on the homeowners ' part for disconnecting foundation drains or repairing service lateral leaks on private property would indeed be the responsibility of the private property owner. The improvements to the sanitary sewer system would, by rights, be funded from the City ' s Sewer Expansion Fund No. 401 and likewise, although no watermain repairs are anticipated for this area, any field con- dition which warrants watermain repairs would be funded out of ■ 1 Don Ashworth July 19 , 1989 Page 3 the Water Expansion Fund No. 402 . As you will recall , we have budgeted $150 ,000 in the Sewer Expansion Fund for 1989 for sewer repairs to eliminate infiltration/inflow. We likewise are anti- cipating a similar commitment for the 1990 and future Sewer Expansion Fund budgets . ' A comment is also appropriate at this time to further address the need for a storm sewer utility fund to be established for the City to provide a vehicle for addressing the storm sewer upgrades such as are proposed in this study. Without a fund of this nature the $88 ,146 of storm sewer improvements not being assessed will need to be funded through a bond issue. The report contains in the appendix preliminary assessment rolls for the various funding/assessment options . As noted above, the actual assessment roll would not be compiled and adopted until ' after the construction project has been completed. Since this is a public improvement project, the next step after ' acceptance of the feasibility study would be to call a public hearing. Due to the uniqueness of this project and the new policy being considered by the City concerning street reconstruction and utility repair, it is my suggestion that a neighborhood meeting ' be held to invite the interested public in the project area to discuss the policies and receive input on the project on a more informal basis . Any inputs and modifications to the feasibility ' study could then be prepared based on this public input as appro- priate and revised documents submitted for a formal public hearing. The project schedule, as I see it, would result in construction most likely in the spring of 1990 . I believe that the design phase of this project needs to be thorough enough to address the project challenges and therefore will take perhaps a little more ' time then normal . The public input element will also add three to four weeks to the schedule. There is an advantage to this in that the construction documents would be prepared during the late summer and fall of this year and bidding could then be done during a more favorable bidding climate. It is therefore my recommendation that the attached feasibility ' study prepared by William R. Engelhardt & Assocates be accepted and that a public information meeting be held to receive local input on this project. It is further recommended that the formal ' public hearing on this report be held September 11 , 1989 . Attachments 1 . April 5 , 1989 staff report . 2 . Feasibility study. 3 . Memorandums concerning the City ' s sealcoat maintenance program. 4 . Section 19-44 of the City Code. c: Bill Engelhardt • CITY OF ,AA 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 ` (612) 937-1900 MEMORANDUM TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager T::_sioti FROM: Gary Warren, City Engineer DATE: April 5 , 1989 ��. ""I•.rj��f SUBJ: Authorize Feasibility Study for Utility and Roadway Improvements to Frontier Trail from Highland Drive to Kiowa Project No. 89-10 When Frontier Trail was first constructed around 1967 , little did people know that to travel on this roadway in the 1980s would be as challenging as its name implies. The roadway has been repaired and patched and sealcoated over the years; however, it has diminished to such a state that continued maintenance of this nature is truly a waste of money since these are only band-aid solutions and a major operation is needed for the cure. In 1988 , the City contracted for a "Road Rater" deflection ' testing of the pavement surface to determine if complete replace- ment of the roadway section and reconstruction of the sub-base would be necessary or if instead some sort of remedial overlay could be conducted on this roadway section. The results of the Road Rater analysis had confirmed that the sub-base of the road- way has deteriorated to such an extent that complete reconstruc- tion is in order for a majority of the roadway. 1 In addition , the storm drainage system in this area needs to be upgraded as well as some isolated sanitary sewer and watermain repairs which would be prudent to undertake as long as the road- way surface is being replaced. The City televised the sanitary sewer in this area in 1987 to locate these areas of rehabilita- tion . This would also be the time where we would notify the respective private utilities such as gas, telephone, cable and electric to give them an opportunity to make any necessary impro- vements to their systems and in the case of electric, to consider undergrounding of this utility similar with new subdivisions in the City. This project will be unique in that it is the first residential roadway in the City to be considered for reconstruction . This feasibility study will therefore blaze the trail in helping us to 1 IFDon Ashworth April 5 , 1989 Page 2 establish policy as far as the funding of improvements of this ' nature, including any appropriate assessment policies. It has been common practice in other communities where pavement manage- ment systems are in place and street reconstruction is an annual event, to assess a portion of the reconstruction and upgrade costs to abutting property owners . The policies vary from com- munity to community but in general terms, if a roadway is being ' widened or curb and gutter is added when it was not in place before, the abutting residents are normally looked at to pay for the cost for the new elements of the roadway and the costs for restoring the existing portions of the roadway and utilities is borne by the community. This needs to be looked at in full detail as a part of the feasibility study and will be appropriately addressed since the cost estimates for the rehabi- litation will also be presented in the report. The City has a number of older streets in town which are can- didates for improvement and once we have established a program, ' the next likely candidate after Frontier Trail would be the Chan Estates area, i .e. Cheyenne road and the old town area ( see attached letter to Elinor Kerber) . It is therefore my recommen- dation that the City Council authorize the preparation of a feasibility study for utility and roadway improvements for Frontier Trail from Highland Drive to Kiowa and that it prepared by the firm of William R. Engelhardt & Associates. Attachments 1 . Location map. 2 . Letter from A. L. Brock dated April 7 , 1988 . 3 . Road Rater sheets . 4 . Letter to Elinor Kerber dated April 3 , 1989 . cc: Bill Engelhardt A. L. Brock ' Manager ' s Comment: It should be noted: 1 . Sealcoat Program: When the sealcoat orogram was initiated in the early 1980 ' s , it was noted that a majority of the City' s streets were in good condition and, through such a main- tenance program, we could reasonably assure that the lives of these streets could be maintained well into the future. The ' lower portion of Frontier Trail, Chanhassen Estates, and potentially Scholer ' s Addition (West 76th/Chan View/Iroquois) were specifically identified as streets not meeting City I standards . By contrast, once these areas were brought up to City standards , the City would insure that the life was main- tained in those streets through continuous maintenance. It ■ C 1 Manager' s Comment 1 Page 2 is difficult to assess property owners for street costs ; however, Carver Beach, Greenwood Shores , old town section, West 79th Street, downtown, business park, Pleasant View, are all areas where new streets were installed either separately or in combination with utility work and the costs assessed back to property owners. All new streets, as a part of our Subdivision Ordinance, are required to meet current standards curb and gutter/full depth. These owners have also paid for those streets via purchasing their lots . It was and is staff' s belief that it is not reasonble to have maintenance dollars pay for roadways which have"-been brought up to reasonable standards. Memorandums as considered by the City Council in establishing , the seal maintenance program are proposed to be included with the feasibility study. DC()Pt / 12. 1 i 1 I I dip .re 1 1 ■) =,$.,I..■.I `:J Z•Nal / R( COURT ,�.e., , \ ____.„,1j• �� li PL iii/u 0 . , . ,\ .. ,, „,,,,. m. „ „,,,,,......, ...A \, ,, . ....._/111111,11111 LI Rim PWIliaL, .1 IT,!rin?mi■-111;7.11 Yeil -\ IA* (/ 4 '-- KW ra is P4ft.`v viwr . moa ,veA , , aii in gm 410 'tt ** eat ts.itt ir ‘f i . 1„, 6 a 4114Zaiii ritti sww r O _ - .. .."tah-.44' .= ,`> k ' 1s LOTUS \s=t s �� aps r�1 10 l,% •• ∎ •- v_ I ,,� - � q F_ � N�� tj► � RY ��.,/ misuirkaviumn: .••cputi� _______:„..„ 0, . y, d � ©���!�i��.����� Mr:11111110.1,� , �eyr": �'ri 'a MP" PIA �! � L A 1�E \ \ S .. 4�, log E . 3 �o1 �®o. ls�/ alas: , ordo la kta 45 .16., gm.loasiwarKsih- N wiz Calms s 3/4 ,,,l,,n=.. . wr ' Pv% r la:. 220104 Orli . .4114\ (62 VIA - 4s.41.1 1.07 vo-4,7J gra,,,t Rap ..,, „„Ah g k- 1111 \ 16 o li 1 L.� % :: _ �y � 0 Eno NM NM qd =u i■g Mail WEST 16111■ 1��` 4 -,-,.___.... , -1,..... •• .1 IR MU 11111111111 1111111 .'Q'' . '1 ■••=1 CHAN Ems Illtifte2 . HES CUM r. Lino 'DR. ��111 e I ■11111111111 IRA _ .111111 --,..w Am :„' I.. -- 414 P . . DRIVE ;: WU „o.'0 .1,, li 0,..... '•�r et N ta R. ..._„..--1---...--- . - ma mop;6 _J. ' - ,,...11*. ir A ,,.., ... . .... pAClf .,. ."1451-' 8 1$J — — T.T E NIGHWAY m �. 10- 2m NI L. V ��.n o- ow. gal —4, .4..4., ipp.fi 11 t r April 7, 1988 1 Mr. Gary Warren City of Chanhassen 690 Coulter Drive Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Dear Gary: , This is to follow-up on our conversation at City Hall on March 29, 1988. As discussed, I am greatly concerned with two problem areas. First, the ' curbing and run-off drain to Lotus Lake, which is located on the north side of my home. As stated, last summer the swale area was blocked by debris, and during the July storm turned into a raging river which came within five feet of my home. As a direct result, over $8,000 of property damage occurred, none of which was insured. I called City Hall on four occasions and was told the curbing on the east side of Frontier Trail leading to the drain would be repaired. Also, that the drain would be kept clean at all times. Instead, a crew repaired the west curb and I have personally cleared the drain area twice. This is a potentially dangerous situation, not only due to flooding again, but also the embankment above the drain was weakened and the ground could give way at any time. Your immediate attention to the curbing and drain area will be greatly appreciated. ' The second area of concern is the 7100, 7200 and 7300 section of Frontier Trail. The road is literally destroyed and needs to be repaired. Last week, a child was almost run over as a car hit one of the huge potholes and momentarily lost control. This section of Frontier Trail has been in dire need of attention for the past few years, and should be given attention before a serious accident occurs. Also, perhaps by repairing this section of Frontier Trail, a good portion of the drain problem will be reduced. Pieces of asphalt are constantly washed down from the 7300 block and clog the drain. If there is anything I can do as a property owner who pays over $5,000/year in property tax, to edpedite these matters, please contact me. I thank you in advance for your concern and attention. ' Sincerely, A.L. Brock 7203 Frontier Trail .Oa II Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 934-9539 ALB:jm cc: Mayor Tom Hamilton Chanhassen City Council ►N•• ��1 Wt All u(--w t'iO� . Ate` o„�tlar .1 1 1 n expansion of � ` s 1VS T PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT, INC. ! �.� f. - � ;trice 1957 t PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES 111'404 Concordia Avenue, St. Paul. MN 55104—612 / 644-2996 1 September 21, 1988 ICITY OF CHANHASSEN Mr. Gary Warren 690 Coulter Drive PO Box 147 IChanhassen, MN 55317 I Dear Mr. Warren; IEnclosed please find a copy of our report entitled PAVEMENT STRENGTH EVALUATION I FOR CITY OF CHANHASSEN I We sincerely appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you and to the City of Chanhassen. Should there be any questions regarding the contents of the report or any of our other services, please do not hesitate to call. I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 11 i° (JZ9 a David W. Janisch, P.E. !I Registration Number: 18562 Date: G. /;_,.., /ep- I I I I I INTRODUCTION , The City of Chanhassen contacted Braun Pavement Technologies to conduct deflection testing on approximately 5 miles of city streets. The deflection testing was done on August 1-2 , 1988 . The testing was done with a Model 2000 Road Rater at 100 foot - intervals in both directions. The spacing was staggered in 1M either direction so that a net spacing of 50 feet was achieved for each section of roadway. The purpose of this report is to make recommendations for , pavement rehabilitation based on effective subgrade R-value, Effective Granular Equivalency, overlay thickness, and spring axle load restriction in tons per axle. This report makes reference to 2331, 2341 and Class 5. These refer to the Minnesota Department of Transportation standard specifications for highway construction for plant mixed bituminous pavement, plant mixed bituminous surface, and aggregates for surface and base courses respectively. 3 ' 3 1 1 ' 3 i 3 ' I ' I , 3 , 1 t FRONTIER TRAIL FROM 177 FEET WEST OF KIOWA CIRCLE TO HIGHLAND DRIVE IANALYSIS This section is 3188 feet long and consists of 2 .5 inches of asphalt surface. It was originally assumed that this section consisted of 2. 0 inches of 2341 wearing course over 4 . 0 inches of II 2331 binder. However, after analyzing the data, it was apparent that either the traffic reported was too low, or the in-place thickness was not as high as originally reported. Braun Engineering Testing took 3 cores at locations indicated on the I attached sheet on Frontier Trail. These cores indicate an asphalt surface ranging from a minimum of 2-3/8 inches to a maximum of 2-3/4 inches. The data was re-evaluated using 2.5 inches of asphalt. The traffic is assumed to be a minimum of 3 . 0 I daily ESALs. The surface condition rating is 2.3 with medium to high severity alligator cracking located at nearly every test point. IDESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS I Area 1: 177 feet west of Kiowa Circle to Laredo Drive R-value = 9 EGE = 8 . 0 inches Overlay = 2 .5 inches (9-ton) I1. 5 inches (7-ton) 1 Area 2 : Laredo Drive to Highland Drive I R-value = 10 EGE = . 5 inches Overlay = 2 . 0 inches (9-ton) II1. 0 inches (7-ton) 1 Tonnage = 7 tons per axle I DISCUSSION There is one area of extremely low subgrade soil strength in Area 1 located at location 349 where the effective R-value is only 4 . I If this roadway is ever reconstructed, it is recommended that the soil be corrected at that location. 1Due to the large amount of high severity load related distress I (alligator cracking) , it is recommended that this section be reconstructed. The large amount of load related distress indicates that this roadway was subject to axle loads in excess I of the 7-ton recommendation. Repeated applications of axle loads in excess of a pavement's allowable limit will result in shortened pavement life due to accelerated fatigue. The I recommended reconstruction section for this roadway is as follows: 9-ton Design 7-ton Design I 1. 5 inches 2341 wearing course 2 . 0 inches 2341 wearing course 1. 5 inches 2331 binder 5. 0 inches Class 5 Aggregate Base 5. 0 inches Class 5 Aggregate Base I III FROM BRAUN EN3. c. P. MN (WEO )09. :1 . ' _8 14: 39 NO. PAGE Z I • REPORT OF FIEL. : El ?��. i Hill °wady BITUMINOUS TESTS ENGINEERING TESTING 8:^ce t" Imismommumml Tested for: L14 1 Ck-1\tc.5 (7rjL'j Project #: aP r # 1 Z. Date: 912_4s Test No. I Probe Depth Density Count I Wet Density I Gauge Serial No: Sub-base Density Density standard: c Sub-base/Bitum. i Response Moisture Standard: : g Nuclear Method ASTM: D2922-81 Marshall Density ASTM: D1559 I X_ Core; Method ASTM• 11?7?6 MAv Then fiensity ASTM: 02041 i Laydown Max Lab In Place Tql MN 9t Thiamin,' Tmmn Renmity flit nrniry Prrrrnt Snenhart No. Cate SPCC.a Course (m.) ( P) (PCF) (PCF) Compaction Compaction Commonts I 2 234" . l I 1 t Test — No. TEST LOCATION 1._ ` Lane 1 ' 5 c•)es; F Gt✓2 N d1)--M a,0`30-4, G -M, 62-06 11 a r RAtt_. --- L t. A 5� o G C u£_8 5 o ont 3 mi foz 0 198 F t-I 1 --� • • -' 1. Bituminous A. Test Results Comply With Compaction Specifications. 2. R. Toct Roculto Do Not Comply With Cpeeifizettiens. 3. Field Representative _ I • I BRAUN PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. - COM.( ION NO: 88-426 - a ( DATE OF'TEST (M/D/Y): 8/2/88 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FRONTIER TRA IL IDAILY ESAL's: 3.0 TEMPERATURE RANGE (deg.F): 84-84 from: 1777 ' WEST OF= K IOWA CIRCLE ASPHALT THICKNESS (inches): 6.0 to: HIGHLAND DRIVE I SURFACE CONDITION RATING: 2.3 SEASONAL CORRECTION FACTOR: 1.64 COMMENTS: (R) AND (L) REFERENCE THE TEST POINT LOCATION TO THE CENTERLINE / MODIFIED SEASONAL CORRECTION FACTOR. TEST --SENSOR READINGS (MILS)-- EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE AXLE LOAD LOCATION FORCE FREE DEFL DEFL DEFL DEFL SUBGRADE B.E. RESTRICTION It (FEET) (KIPS) (H2) #1 12 13 #4 R-VALUE (INCHES) (TONS/AXLE) COMMENTS 0 R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- --- ---- 177FT W OF KIONA CR I 48 L 3.04 15.0 10.75 7.68 4.30 1.30 9 11.8 8.1 L-TRANS.CR 101 R 2.97 15.0 7.78 7.28 2.98 1.54 10 18.1 10.5 M-ALLIG.CR/PATCH 149 L 3.04 15.0 6.73 5.22 1.52 1.25 16 15.3 10.2 M-TRANS.CR 177 R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- --- ---- C/L KIOYA CR I 201 R 3.00 15.0 6.69 4.28 2.03 1.75 17 14.2 9.9 L-TRANS.CR 246 L 2.99 15.0 7.00 6.52 2.86 1.92 10 20.3 11.4 PATCH 301 R 3.04 15.0 7.41 5.22 2.71 1.99 13 16.0 10.1 M-ALLIG.CR I 349 L 2.54 15.2 13.67 12.23 6.57 1.68 4 10.7 6.8 PATCH 400 R 2.97 15.0 8.26 7.26 2.63 1.97 10 16.7 9.9 M-ALLIG.CR 446 L 2.97 15.1 5.78 3.92 1.67 1.28 19 15.6 10.6 M-ALLIG.CR I 501 R 3.07 15.0 7.32 4.72 2.22 1.31 16 13.4 9.5 M-ALLIG.CR 550 L 2.96 15.0 4.40 3.00 1.51 1.21 24 19.0 12.4 PATCH 600 R 3.07 15.0 8.80 8.75 2.49 1.67 8 17.8 10.1 M-ALLIG.CR 648 L 3.15 15.0 3.79 2.89 - 1.63 1.50 23 25.6 15.6 M-ALLIG.CR I 702 R 2.49 15.0 12.39 12.18 1.67 1.28 7 11.7 7.7 L-TRANS.CR 747 L 3.05 15.1 8.70 6.08 1.97 1.10 13 11.7 8.7 PATCH 821 R 3.12 15.0 9.83 5.64 2.44 1.87 13 8.7 7.8 M-ALLIG.CR I 844 L 3.01 15.0 9.46 6.12 2.03 1.38 12 9.9 8.0 PATCH 901 R 3.01 15.0 12.77 8.53 2.37 1.16 9 7.4 6.9 M-ALLIG.CR 949 L 3.03 15.1 9.33 6.44 1.91 1.10 12 10.7 8.2 M-ALLIG.CR 1001 R 3.05 15.1 7.24 4.12 1.88 1.24 18 11.0 B.9 L-ALLIG.CR I 1049 L 3.03 15.1 8.31 4.99 1.75 1.43 15 9.9 8.3 M-ALLIG.CR 1103 R 3.14 15.1 9.88 4.35 1.77 1.15 16 5.9 7.2 H-ALLIG.CR 1149 L 3.07 15.1 6.71 6.11 2.42 1.37 12 19.1 11.3 M-ALLIG.CR I 1200 R 3.06 15.1 7.89 4.74 1.96 1.21 16 11.0 8.7 H-ALLIG.CR 1250 L 3.11 15.1 8.60 6.13 2.35 1.28 13 12.9 9.0 H-ALLIG.CR 1301 R 3.04 15.0 8.24 6.78 2.07 1.94 11 15.2 9.6 L-ALLIG.CR/PATCH I 1348 L 3.08 15.0 10.96 6.09 2.22 1.48 12 6.8 7.2 H-ALLIG.CR 1402 R 2.99 15.0 9.88 6.01 2.08 1.50 12 8.7 7.7 M-TRANS.CR 1434 L 3.06 15.0 9.18 5.22 1.72 1.27 15 8.3 7.8 PATCH 1503 R 2.96 15.0 7.69 5.06 2.01 1.28 14 12.3 9.0 M-ALLIG.CR I 1542 L 3.00 15.0 7.10 5.07 1.90 1.41 15 14.4 9.8 M-ALLIG.CR/PATCH 1602 R 2.99 15.0 6.81 5.47 1.82 1.40 14 16.2 10.4 L-ALLIG.CR 1646 L 3.04 15.0 8.94 8.87 2.15 1.62 9 17.0 9.8 PATCH I 1712 R 3.00 15.0 6.19 4.05 1.79 1.24 14 14.6 10.2 M-ALLIG.CR 1749 L 3.04 15.0 11.89 8.39 2.18 1.26 9 8.6 7.3 H-ALLIG.CR 1800 R 3.06 15.0 6.69 4.01 1.70 1.24 20 12.3 9.4 M-ALLIG.CR II 1850 L 2.96 15.0 4.92 3.89 2.29 1.72 15 23.2 13.6 PATCH 1902 R 3.01 15.0 7.31 4.78 2.00 1.18 16 12.9 9.3 M-ALLIG.CR 1947 L 3.01 15.0 7.52 4.94 2.03 1.27 15 12.8 9.2 L-TRANS.CR 2005 R 3.03 15.0 7.07 4.16 1.96 1.68 18 11.8 9.1 L-BLOCK CR I 2048 L 3.09 15.1 6.10 4.61 2.28 1.62 15 18.6 11.5 M-ALLIG.CR 2101 R 2.92 15.0 7.83 5.20 2.54 1.84 13 13.5 9.2 2149 L 2.99 15.0 8.40 6.15 2.27 1.46 12 13.2 9.0 M-ALLIG.CR II IRAUN PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. - CON( ION NO: 88-426 (CONTINUED) 1 DATE OF TEST (N/D/Y): 8/2/8B CITY OF CHANHASSEN FRONTIER TRA I L )AILY ESAL's: 3.0 ' •EMPERATURE RANGE (deq.F): 84-84 from: 177 ' WEST OF K IOWA CIRCLE ASPHALT THICKNESS (inches): 6.0 to: HIGHLAND DR I V E >URFACE CONDITION RATING: 2.3 I ;EASONAL CORRECTION FACTOR: 1.64 COMMENTS: (R) AND (L) REFERENCE THE TEST POINT LOCATION TO THE CENTERLINE / MODIFIED SEASONAL CORRECTION FACTOR. TEST --SENSOR READINGS (MILS)-- EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE AXLE LOAD I LOCATION FORCE FRED DEFL DEFL DEFL DEFL SUBGRADE G.E. RESTRICTION (FEET) (KIPS) (HZ) 11 #2 13 #4 R-VALUE (INCHES) (TONS/AXLE) COMMENTS I 2201 R 3.01 15.0 7.09 5.07 2.36 1.43 14 15.3 10.0 H-ALLIG.CR 2247 L 2.99 15.0 7.21 5.25 2.48 1.79 13 16.0 10.1 M-ALLIG.CR i 2290 R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- --- ---- C/L LAREDO DR 2317 R 3.02 15.0 9.79 7.24 2.82 1.97 10 12.6 8.5 PATCH 2350 L 3.07 15.0 8.80 6.11 2.79 1.94 11 13.3 9.0 L-ALLIG.CR 2401 R 3.00 15.0 8.62 6.35 2.55 1.71 11 13.6 9.1 H-ALLIG.CR I 2449 L 3.06 15.0 10.42 6.61 2.64 1.82 11 9.6 7.8 M-ALLIG.CR 2501 R 3.07 14.9 9.00 5.58 2.34 1.72 13 10.6 8.S M-ALLIG.CR/PATCH 2548 L 3.02 15.0 5.84 4.65 2.29 1.86 14 20.5 12.1 PATCH I 2600 R 3.06 15.0 5.88 5.16 1.85 1.30 15 19.4 11.8 PATCH 2644 L 3.11 14.7 7.32 4.51 2.43 1.79 16 13.5 9.5 L-TRANS.CR/PATCH 2703 R 3.02 15.0 9.54 8.63 2.98 1.70 9 15.2 9.2 M-TRANS.CR I 2747 L 3.02 15.1 9.33 6.92 3.00 2.27 10 13.8 8.9 L-ALLIG.CR 2810 R 3.07 15.0 7.97 5.21 2.66 2.06 13 13.8 9.4 M-ALLIG.CR 2846 L 3.08 15.1 7.87 6.48 2.42 1.77 11 16.3 10.1 L-ALLIG.CR 2900 R 2.96 15.0 7.92 6.12 2.57 2.03 11 15.7 9.8 L-TRANS.CR I 2950 L 3.02 15.0 9.66 6.02 2.41 1.75 12 9.8 8.0 L-ALLIG.CR 3001 R 3.03 15.0 8.47 5.42 2.59 2.15 13 12.4 8.9 PATCH 3049 L 3.04 15.0 10.48 8.92 2.93 2.53 8 14.0 8.7 H-ALLIG.CR I 3101 R 3.03 15.0 9.53 5.48 3.36 2.32 12 10.3 8.1 L-ALLIG.CR 3142 R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- --- ---- PVMT CH6 3150 L 3.06 15.0 7.74 6.02 2.82 1.94 11 16.7 10.2 } 3188 R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- --- ---- C/L HIGHLAND DR I I I L 1 I I I IBRAUN PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. - CO a SIDN NO: 88-426 • DATE O'F TEST (M/D/Y): 8/2/88 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FRONTIER TRAIL DAILY ESAL's: 3.0 TEMPERATURE RANGE (deg.F): 84-84 from: 1 77 ' WEST OF E:.I O W A CIRCLE ASPHALT THICKNESS (inches): 6.0 to: HIGHLAND DRIVE SURFACE CONDITION RATING: 2.3 I SEASONAL CORRECTION FACTOR: 1.64 COMMENTS: (R) AND (L) REFERENCE THE TEST POINT LOCATION TO THE CENTERLINE / MODIFIED SEASONAL CORRECTION FACTOR. '° EFFECTIVE SUFGRADE R-VALUE i 0 10 20 70 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 i _I , , „ I . , , , 1 , , , , I , 1 „ I , , , , I , , „ 1 . , , , I , r . , I , , , , 1 „ r 1 177FT W F O KIOWA CR ': 48 - L-TRANS. CR 14 _ t'1M-A!_L I G. C[�/F'A"I CH '? yi PATCH R[116 J A R '246 ---------r- f R Ht i 1 301 -°"°"..... M ALLIG. CR 349 ---- 40 PATCH M-ALLIG. CR 4 - M-ALLIG. C ' 501 —' M-ALLIG. CR 55 - PATCH 600 48 ---.- _ M-ALLIG. CR 702 ----- M-ALLIG. Cf1 IF - -- L-TRANS. CR 742 PATCH gz4 = .....--.. 3Aijt kIG. CR 901 - 949 _ M-ALLIG. CR I ir_�r._i1 _ M-ALLIG. CR 1049 - L-ALLIG. CR I M-ALLIG. CR 1149 - H-ALLIG. CR 1149 - M-ALLIG. CR CR 1Ct>!_> -.. w..�.. H-ALLIG. CR I 1256 -c. ..... 13 1 - H-ALLIG. CF: 1348 - L-ALLIG. CR/PATCH 11.9, - F _ALL NS. CR I _ _ MhAfl!���l���Ii ccEE,, ice ^ = rl-2LLI3. CR/PATCH i640 = T L- I IG. CR IL134 _ n ��LLLLII 1800 - M-ACCTLD.CR 185 - M-ALLIG. CR �:, _ PATCH _ M-ALLIG. C'R _ I_-'1 RHI�IS. 8R I '048 _. -•-•®---• icj- L E I u. C�� 2101 ---- 149 -------- M-ALLIG. CF: IL 6s - H-ALLIG. CR 2 _ h - L_H,. . Ul J.y - - � IG. C�R 401 -•—...... 2449 --®•---•. M-ALLIG. CR --•-•-�. M-ALLIG. CR • 2501 - 2548 --. M-ALLIG. CR/PATCH 73 PATCH H 2 i -. -. ..-. TT CC A44 ` "° " L-t NS. CR/PATCH 207 _ . , § ` = 1-At 29�t�_1 w-�o L-TRANS. CR I -ALL I 3. CR'0i1 - ..- .. w- PATCH T49 —....—.. H-ALL I G.CR c -® .. .. . LL__ �((;; t/ H NLA ND DR . II I 3500 -10, r-F , -I . r r 1 T T-T-T T 1_,..T07- r , I , , I r 111 r . 16,--m-0 T , F 7 'etc] T F I r , , 7 I 10 20 40 50 60 7U 80 90 l 0 0 ■ .-4 (RAUN PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. - COY( ION NO: 88-426 I DATE OF TEST (M/D/Y): 8/2/88 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FRONTIER TRA I'L ALLY ESAL's: 3.0 ' 'EMPERATURE RANGE (deg.F): 84-94 from: 177 ' WEST OF K IOWA C I R C L E ASPHALT THICKNESS (inches): 6.0 to: HIGHLAND DRIVE SURFACE CONDITION RATING: 2.3 I ;ER50NAL CORRECTION FACTOR: 1.64 COMMENTS: (R) AND (L) REFERENCE THE TEST POINT LOCATION TO THE CENTERLINE / MODIFIED SEASONAL CORRECTION FACTOR. f EFFECTIVE PAVEMENT I GRANULAR THICKNESS (inches) 0 5 10 15 20 25 '(_) 7,5 40 45 s- 0 _I I I I . I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I i I 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 77FT W OF ('`IOWA ci 48 ------ —•--- L—TRANS. CR i) M—A /PATCH bZI RA( aJ 'RCR i 246 ■ PATCH II 301 —_ M—ALL I G. CR 3449 PATCH 4OA M—ALL I G. CE 446 M—ALLIG. 0 II 501 — M—ALL I G. CR 55 ) — • .... ..••••. . . PATCH - 60(2 —..__..__ __.-___ ._.. .__._._.._ _ M—ALLIG. CFi 648 — M—ALLIG. CR 702 L—TRANS. CR 747 —..,..,.. I _ __... PATCH 4 =�.-_. -- _ 18Af-1 I G. CR 9r)1 —eamassemssmaamiamm M—ALLIG. CR 949 --.-----®---.. 1001 M—ALLIG. CR — 1 II t]49 L—ALLIG. CR —��- M—ALLIG. CR 1107 49 H—ALLIG. CR 1149 —.... ._ M—ALLIG. CR 1-'00 —susamalamommaaaasamaanamal H—ALLIG. CR 1256 H—ALLIG. CR I • 1?i)1 —... ..... ........_.._ ., L—ALLIG. CR/PATCH 1 :A.8 .... 8 — H—ALL;G, CR 1 , . 277777-77-777— 71.. —�"-',L /PATCH I EfE:E :/ ' 1$` ._._... 1-A LH G. CR 1 }3 _ H- EEIE:ER , L 18C)t) - M—HLLIG. CR 1g851) - PATCH 1947 —�� M—ALL I G. CR L— {-RAMS.CR — 04 9 __ h=am ELER I 214 — M—ALLIG. CF: ;5:7i0.1 ____ .�...... H—ALLIGS. CF:CR L i- C) _— ELIG. CR II 2401 H—ALLIG. CR 2449 M—ALLIG. CR 7.501 ` M—ALLIG. CR/PATCH I 2548 —.. ... - • ___ PATCH 2i _ m ATCH — '"'"°" -" L—TRANS.CR/PATCH X747 —. .0 -4EzR:E : 2S4`6 = zm.is-....ym L-4t.t}E: El 1 2900 — .. .. _ _ • L—TRANS. CR -'951 i — L—ALL I G. CR 3(�n 1 — PATCH I (_)49 — "-"- - "°""-"°" H—ALL I G. CR �� �.____ I"3 rr ° LLLL CR C/ H ALAND DR T I Jf)o —, . . . r 1 I . I I l I 1 1 . 1 1 I I . 1 . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I r1 I 1 I I 1 . . 1 . 1 1 1 1 _ 0 5 10 15 4 40�5 30 35 4 45 50 II • BRAUN PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. - COM'! ION NO: 88-426 C DATE OF,TEST WD/Y): 8/2/88 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FRONTIER TRAIL '`DAILY ESAL's: 3.0 TEMPERATURE RANGE (deg.F): 84-84 free: 177 • WEST OF K I O W A CIRCLE ASPHALT THICKNESS (inches): 6.0 to: HIGHLAND DRIVE I SURFACE CONDITION RATING: 2.3 - SEASONAL CORRECTION FACTOR: 1,64 COMMENTS: (R) AND (11 REFERENCE THE TEST POINT LOCATION TO THE CENTERLINE / MODIFIED SEASONAL CORRECTION FACTOR, IMAXIMUM ALLOWABLE AXLE LOAD (tans/axle) 0 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 II- 4i _I , , , , 1 , , , , I , , I , , , , I „ I , , I „ i , I „ I „ I 1 1 177FT N OF [(low) CR 8 -sionsiumumulaommismalsianammainamismosmannaloomsloanue - .. �.._.. L-TRANS. CR-mmaamw. m...aulmmamam...mm.mmmw -A C . PR/PATCH 14 - _ , . . . _ _ . - , PITK gVeRCR I 246 �SSIMIN ..,IMmmAm-•m••• PATCH 301 M-ALLIG. CR 749 -mc.w.a•.1.m.a PATCH 400 M-ALLIG. CR 446 - aam,aa.. __, N—ALLIG. CR I 501 . M-ALLIG Cr' 550 - _.. .... - .. .. ... .._ ..., ... .. ..._ PATCH E6()') _ m.am,aaw.m . M-ALLIG. CR 648 —•----.a.m,mm.®, ..., ._... ...... .. .. ._.. .mm...m M-ALLIG. CR 7 r.)� - -•-a�,aaa _,___ .. ._._ . _ L-TRANS. CF; I 747 -O amma...sm ---------•--,aa. _ :nw.am.mra�a.aa..: aaa� PATCH 4• _a _. _ ammm. { itL I G. CF 901 ._.. _._. ^ . _..._ ...__...... M-ALLIG. CT; 949 - ,. ..- ._...... . M-ALLIG. CR ' ir._�r)1 - .. .._.__.._ ._...._.., . ....._...._._.... ......_. L-ALLIG. CR 1049 - ... .......... M-ALLIG. CT 1 1:i? —ar....___......... ._.__..r... .. .. .ama®.�a.. ..... H-ALLIG. CR 1149 - m.ma�aa _ M-ALLIG. CR 1 2 0 o -mmmamamaaai.-'-----'--- • ng....aal 1 J'J 6 —amaaa.as.ammaRaaaao�aaaaaac,aa�------ - HL.LIv. CF, ' H-ALLIG. CR 1_01 - _ ... .. .....,....... ............ _...__._ L-ALLIG. CR/PATCH 1 4 8 -.mam,.m. =aa .a.aa.. H-A L L I G. C R 1.3.0.3 .,.m......--_:—.ate .-�a,aa a aam. h C R. -aam....m.w.. m - -1 A 1 L fl a S. ' c V „ — G CF, F ATCH 1##1�.LJ,�•�.,%_• _tv.�c.a..w..as,aaaAavmr�.mam...am _ {I'-1-11 aamiisa�wwaa�m.LOAR..aam,.mmt�ma 1-i f-=f l:7. .�1�. 1 son --.maa.a.1.0• .. _ ._..._..,..___....... M-ALLIG. CR •18 C 0 -aaa®am .mamma..,mammmm. .aa.aa.a,a„aaaaa..aaaa�m PATCH • M-ALL I G. CR 194 aama..aa ..aaoaaam.am. maaora I_-TF;ANS. cR a:.021 f --wamamrww.m.mammvm.auaa,assmiaawwmmaawaa.s.mmmmaaamia –t 21 l)1 —m.awam„maammaaamm_.______--_a ®mammas 2149 - M-ALLIG. CR 2;',.0 1 -a.maa.wam..mam,a.m.m.omm,mmma.am..maaa.mmmmm..m H•-ALLIG. C R I ,.44 =.lmamoma....mmm�m,.m,a.a..aa. m...-�amaa,..m L �`L�=L7 i� D R 1 -AC_,,,C) —.m.mm.amm®---------____wamammm.maam.amm,.mm® _I G. C R 2401 H-ALLIG. CR 4 4 9 -mm..,mm.mm.mmm..www—.mm.mm. aa M-ALLIG. _,7■5(ji. 258 -4 a M-ALLIG. CR/PATCH —nm.m.m,m .. .. _.. _......._. _ ._ PATCH RATH 1111. 2.......................................® L- I R'A N S. C R/ F'A T C H 7 c : --mammal.x111....-1...1aam®alasa...m.mm:ma.a..a..a_....._.a..aW,W.,Naaam.aaaa 7 . aram .w — m..v a m-aa a.W. - R A `.E RI `2 il.g .....aaYAMmaam.l l—.aYY ®am—.maY.mmmm.agYW. L_ EL s =290 'm'monom umaisiaamia..aa.m L-TRANS. CR �9 C i) -aaaaa,...,...,...am..om.m...aaam.ma.m-m..m.m. L.-ALL.I G. C R 0 c i 1 --•:mal.aa.m.'.aaaa'.a°.'m. PATCH 7 0 4 9 - .. .a..asasa.....maau.• H-ALLI G. C R_r Ymaa..al. a-a..1m..a. - LL Fl.,G R 7% C/L F- 1.a LA ND DR I L . -T , , , , I , , , , , ,, 1 , , , , I , , , , I , , , , r , , , , I , , , , I , , t , Ir , , t I o = 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 C() • c CITYOF 1 cHANHAssEN Ii 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, ..... •..• MINNESOTA 55317 `'' (612) 937-1900 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager II FROM: Bill Monk, City Engineer DATE: March 7, 1984 1 SUBJ: Municipal Sealcoating Program II With the coming of spring, I have been attempting to organize my thoughts concerning the sealcoating program approved by the City Council during the budgetary process . The initial step, which is II currently underway, involves preparing an inventory of all City streets as they relate to one of the following categories: 1 . Streets requiring only basic preparation work including II sweeping and crack sealing prior to sealcoating . 2. Streets requiring minor leveling and/or repair prior to II sealcoating . 3 . Streets requiring major leveling and/or repair prior to 1 sealcoating . 4. Streets requiring reconstruction. 1 Upon completion of this listing I will have a better feeling for the magnitude of the program required, however, at present I II believe an eight year program will be required to enable the sealcoating of all eligible streets at the present funding level of two mills . Also, I feel that the program' s highest priority is to protect the street 's that are still in good condition II (category No. 1) . Because these streets require minimal prepara- tion work, quite a few streets can be incorporated into a year 's project and within two years the streets within this category II should be completed. As the program moves into successive cate- gories , the progress will be slowed considerably due to the expense of leveling and blacktop repair . Proceeding to the next step in the process , I am planning on pre- I paring a contract for as many streets within Category No. 1 as the budget will allow. This year ' s contract work will be done II in-house, however, as future contracts become more involved with surface preparation and repair, outside technical assistance will alsmost assuredly be required. II 1 1 Mr . Don Ashworth March 8 , 1984 Page 2 ' Hopefully, I can complete the street inventory and contract Y speci- fications by late April . At that time both items will be sub- !' mitted for City Council review. In the meantime, however, it may be wise to seek out general Council approval of this proposal. Lastly, I have not forgotten that the Council has only approved ' one year 's funding for this program. The future of the program will be reviewed during each budgetary process , therefore, each year ' s contract will be planned as a separate entity that will not be dependent upon future expenditures . • I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 . 1 . § 19-43 CHANHASSEN CITY CODE C Sec. 19-43. Permits for connections,etc. (a) No work which in any way affects the city's sewer lines or connections thereto shall be performed without first obtaining written permit therefor from the city. (b) The master plumber shall make application for a permit on a special form furnished by the city.The permit application shall be supplemented by any plans,specifications or other ' information which the city may reasonably require. (Ord. No. 5, §§ 2.01,2.02, 3-11-85) Sec. 19-44. Certain connection and discharge forbidden. (a) No person shall discharge into the sanitary sewer system any surface or subsurface I waters or fluids used in air conditioning or heating equipment, gravel, sand, dirt or other heavy materials,or any substance causing obnoxious odors or gases. (b) Any person who makes any connection to the sanitary sewer system for the purpose of discharging into the system the substances described in this section shall immediately remove such connection.If such connection is not removed within fifteen(15)days after notice of such violation is served upon such owner or other person, or posted in the premises where such violation has occurred, the city council may order the plumbing inspector to cause such connection to be removed, and the expense of such removal shall be assessed against such J I premises and certified to the county auditor for collection in the same manner as other special assessments, and the same shall become a lien on such property until paid. j (c) To ensure compliance with this section, all construction after March 11, 1985 involv- ing the installation of sump pumps to be used for drainage purposes shall include a convenient outside discharge.This discharge shall be provided whether the pump is actually being put in place or being plumbed for future hook-up. (Ord. No. 5, § 1.05, 3-11-85) Sec. 19-45. Connection charges. (a) No permit shall be issued to connect with the sanitary sewer system of the city either directly or indirectly from any lot or tract of land unless the city clerk shall have certified: (1) That the lot or tract of land, or portion of the lot or tract, to be served by such connection has been assessed for the cost of construction of the sanitary sewer lateral with which the connection is made; or (2) If no assessment has been levied for said construction cost, that proceedings for ' levying such assessment have been or will be commenced in due course; or (3) If no assessment has been levied,and no assessment proceedings will be completed in due course,that a sum equal to the portion of cost of constructing said sanitary sewer which would be assessable against said lot or tract has been paid to the city as outlined in subsection(b)below. 1070 ,.��, ...._,:.4.40,1 Statement 2 1984 General Fund Page 6 Commentary • Revenues: Property Taxes - Represents state formula (1984 property taxes = 1983 property taxes + [1983 State Aids and previous year reductions] - 1984 State Aids). This calculation significantly reduces state aids and increases local property taxes. However, it does not provide any additional revenues to the City. The amount of property tax increase, I over that required by the State, has been set at 5% of 1983 Total Resources. The Utility Fund transfers to the General Fund (for both 1983 and 1984 have been deleted in recognition of the budgeting problems of that fund). Following Council hearings, $120,000 was added to the 1984 budget to initiate a dedicated street sealing program. 141 Ili (See Street Maintenance below) Permits - Better economic conditions have increased construction activities. Ili Required Reserves - Increased to approximately 20%. Expenditures: Ili Legislative: No new personnel budgeted. Included in travel and training $1,250 - Council attendance at the A.P.A. National Conference to be held in Minneapolis in 1984. Newsletter - 3 editions. Changes to the Mayor and Council salaries should be acted on at this time, to be effective January 1, 1985 (State law prohibits changes prior to such date). Ili Administrative: No new personnel budgeted. IBM copier estimated cost - $1,200 per month. Finance: Temporary salaries - $3,500 budgeted. CETA funding ceases for current part time student. $2,000 included for converting old records to microfilm. City Hall: CETA funding no longer available for custodian. Insurance and utility costs con- tinue to increase. Repairs no longer under warranty. Election: Costs for general election in 1984. No new equipment budgeted. III Fire Prevention: - Fire Personnel: Salary increase included ($3.50/hr to $4.50/hr for firemen - graduated for officers). Total costs should remaim stable Ili recognizing reduction in first responder role. - Fire Equipment: See Federal Revenue Sharing (Statement 3). One half of request deleted. - Fire Dept. Capital Outlay: See Motor Vehicle Depreciation (Statement 4). - Fire Marshal: Addition of P.T. position included for 1984. Animal Control: Continuation of Tri-City Animal Control included. City's share of new van III amortizied for payment over three years. See Motor Vehicle Depreciation (Statement 4). Engineering: No new personnel budgeted. Street Maintenance:80 to 90% of Chanhassen's streets are 3-10 years old (relatively Ili new). However,without periodic sealing (2.50 lin. ft) premature deterioration will occur ($40-$50/ft for reconst.)Costs could be specially assessed. However, after significant discussion the Council set a 2 mill levy, dedicated for this purpose, this would better serve our citizens. IliStreet Lighting: Power costs to operate new installations and rate increases (11%). Garage: Heat and electricity continue to increase. Capital improvements include a welding Ili exhauster and flammable liquids locker be installed on the request of the insurance company. Park Maintenance: Deletion of Sumner Youth Funding (CETA) requires additional local expense. Capital improvements include two pair of hockey goals and a landscaping rake. iiPark & Recreation Administration: Includes part time salary for supervising summer activities, i.e. softball, tennis, Lake Ann activities, etc. Recreation Programs: Includes life guards and fees to Community Schools for providing various program activities specifically for the City of Chanhassen (Chaska & Minnetonka School III Districts). Self supporting Programs: The amount of reverie re,_eived approximates expenditures. Revenue genera ed rrom softball and tennis cmgistration. Planning Commission: Attendance at A.P.A. National Conference in Minneapolis. Planning Administration: Staff attendance at A.P.A. National Conference. Costs related to ill _= amending zoning and subdivision ordinances. II