Loading...
1b. Proposal for Preliminary Alignment of TH 101 from 5 to 212 I i b 1 -4 CITYOF -- 1 '1111 CHANHASSEN' 14i.r..'-'4- I .'.I. 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 Acton by Cir, \r1-ninisT.= Endorsed`Pip ' IMEMORANDUM Ntod;;,ed___._______ ........ TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager Doti_ 7..-_2,=__ ?‘Y IIFROM: Gary Warren, City Engineer Dee sup ,.>d ,, DATE: February 22 , 1989 .��` � I SUBJ: Accept Proposal for Preliminary Alignment Study for TH 101 from TH 5 to PH 212 (new) 1 File No. PW067F I As the City has progressed with its Trunk Highway 101 realignment plans, much time and effort has peen dedicated to intersection configurations and alignments for Trunk Highway 101 at its north leg configuration and at the Lake Drive/Market Boulevard junction 1 near the Rosemount development site. The southern extension of realigned TH 101 south of Rosemount through the Ward and Klingelhutz properties has received general discussion to this 1 point, such that we have incorporated construction costs in our planning for this area; however, the specific alignment and offi- cial mapping of this corridor through these properties had not been a necessity until recently. 1 By not identifying the future alignment of Trunk Highway 101 through these parcels, the property owners are unable to effec- t tively deal with the development of their property. In addition, the City recently received Layout No. 4 from MnDOT for Trunk Highway 212 ( see attached correspondence) requesting City appro- val for the proposed TH 212 alignment. This will lead to the official mapping of the TH 212 corridor. In order for the City to approve the TH 212 layout and to release the Ward and Klingelhutz properties which currently are being held hostage in 1 lieu of this alignment commitment, it is necessary for us to take a close look at the land use, alignment, construction, cost and environmental aspects of the various alternatives for the exten- t Sion of Trunk Highway 101 through the Ward and Klingelhutz properties. 1 The attached proposal from Hoisington Group, Inc . has been pre- pared to address these needs which would lead ultimately to an official mapping of the TH 101 corridor through the Ward and Klingelhutz properties. Time is of the essence in this regard in IIorder that we can respond to MnDOT' s request for TH 212 layout II il Don Ashworth , February 22 , 1989 Page 2 approval and also so that the Ward and Klingelhutz properties can pursue their development interests knowing with cofidence where the TH 101 realignment will impact their properties . It is therefore recommended that the attached proposal dated February 22 , 1989 submitted by Hoisington Group, Inc. be accepted by the City Council and authorized for execution . Attachments ' 1 . February 1 , 1989 correspondence from MnDOT. 2 . Proposal from Hoisington Group, Inc . dated February 22 , 1989. cc : Al Klingelhutz Evan Green, MnDOT_ M. J. Ward Estate Manager ' s Comments: At the same time that Gary Warren was approaching Hoisington Group regarding officially mapping TH 101 from the Business Park to new TH 212 , this office, in concert with the Planning Department, was also meeting with Mr . Hoisington regarding land use questions. Specifically , the Ward parcel will become one of the most highly sought parcels within our community during the next five years . A frontage road (Lake Drive) as originally proposed, would create lots having approxi- mately 200 to 300 ft. of depth. This type of parcel would almost assuredly generate innumerable requests for fast food restaurants, gas and oil convenience centers , etc. By contrast, having a realignment of old TH 101, in a fashion similar to that presented in the feasibility study, would establish three major parcels for the Wards . The question presented is one of "How does the City wish to see these properties developed? , appropriate zoning?" . Similar to the points raised above, the realignment of TH 101 on ' the Hennepin County side will establish new vacant parcels in the vicinity of the Taco Shop, South Lotus Lake Park and Bongard property. Again, the City needs to be in a position to respond to how redevelopment of these areas should occur and how the reconfigured property should be zoned . Finally, all of the parcels south of the railroad tracks between Great Plains Blvd. and Dakota Avenue represent potential redevelop- ment lots, i .e. Red-E-Mix property, new Hanus facility , etc . Will this area support a frontage road to serve these parcels? Can access be obtained to new TH 101? What vehicular restraints will exist at Great Plains and that frontage road? ■ II IDon Ashworth February 22 , 1989 Page 3 II Although the combined proposal by Mr. Hoisington represents a II significant sum, this office believes that such is basically serving two different purposes and, accordingly should be paid via 50% Economic Development District dollars and 50% through the realigned TH 101 project revenues. IIApproval of the proposal is endorsed by this office and, again , represents a combined proposal of the Engineering/Planning/Housing and Redevelopment Authority departments . IIcc : Housing and Redevelopment Authority, Item for Next Agenda I II II I I I I I 11 I II II I 1 .,04EsOp4 Minnesota yo Department of Transportation 1L cc District 5 2055 No. Lilac Drive of ThP'y' Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422 February 1 , 1989 (612)593- 8403 Gary Warren, P.E . City Engineer City of Chanhassen 690 Coulter Drive P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 , S .P . 1017-07 (TH 212 ) From W. Chanhassen Limits to E. Carver Co. Line Layout No. 4 City Approval Dear Mr. Warren, , Transmitted herewith for review and approval are the preliminary plans for the above referenced project . These proposed plans are the result of many months of study and close coordination between the City of Chanhassen and Mn/DOT. As you may recall , The City held three public meetings ( Jan. 29 , March 25 and June 3 , 19Q7 ) on the proposed "Concept Layout" . The City Council then approved "Concept Layout 3A" , with the addition of a proposed T.H. 101 interchange; at their June 29 , 1987 meeting. This layout is essentially the same except we have made the following additions : - Areas needed for ponding and or wetland replacement ' have been shown on the layout. - Approximate construction limits have been shown on the layout. - Improved connections to existing TH 101 in the Chanhassen Hills area have been added to the layout. - A frontage road was added left of approx. Sta. 1080± and 1090±. This is needed to serve the existing farmstead. CITY OF CHANHASSEN C ORR FEB 0 3 1389 ' An Equal Opportunity Employer ENGINEERING DEPT. ' ■ • Gary Warren, P . E . ' February 1 , 1989 Page 2 Once the city has approved the preliminary plans , Mn DOT will finalize the "Official Map" based on the construction ' limits shown on the plans . The "Official Map" will then be transmitted to the city for adoption. ' If you have any questions in regard to the plans or project; please contact Carl Hoffstedt, District Transportation Planning Engineer, or Evan Green, Project Manager. Thank you for your cooperation on the project. Sincerely, W.M. Crawfo District Engineer f K 1 I 1 Hoisington Group Inc. Land Use Consultants February 22, 1989 CITY OF CHANHASSEN , Mr. Donald Ashworth, City Manager �'15� Iltl�0 City of Chanhassen FEB 231989 , 690 Coulter Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 ENGINEERING DEPT. 'Re: Proposal for a Preliminary Alignment and Land Use Corridor Study for Highway 101 from Highways 5 to proposed 212 and Highway 5 from the Carver County line to Market Boulevard. Don: 1 As per our discussion on Monday February 6, 1989, I herewith submit this proposal for professional planning services to study and formulate , recommendations with regard to the above project. Its purposes are as follows: 1. To provide a response to MnDOT regarding the Official Mapping of Trunk Highway 212 especially as it relates to Trunk IIighway 101 just north of proposed Trunk Highway 212. 2. To establish right-of-way limits and roadway aesthetics recommen- ' dations for Trunk Highway 101 for inclusion with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 3. To serve as the basis for the Official Mapping of th e proposed Highway 101 right-of-way between Highways 5 and proposed 212. 4. To establish a land use plan for areas within the Highway 101/5 Corridor that warrant additional consideration due to the proposed realignment of Highway 101. The Consultant will: ' 1. Prepare a Base Map with topography to be used to record base information and render plans. 7300 Metro Blvd. - Suite 525 Edina.MN 55435 (612)835-9960 P-H—&ck Ole n4- 13 ■ • . .2. Collect and Review Information and Map Existing Natural and Manmade Features including wetlands and water features, vegetation, land ownership, existing land use, utilities and streets, remnant parcels and their sizes and proposed Highway 5 improvement plans sufficient to identify opportunities and constraints. 3. Review the Existing and Proposed Comprehensive Plans and the City's Zoning Map and Ordinance and such other information as will he helpful to formulate recommendations regarding Highway 101 alignment alternatives. ' 4. Meet With Key Individual Landowners throughout the corridor and residents of Chanhassen Estates, Hidden Valley and Lake Susan to ' generate input, review alignment alternatives and development proposals (11 meetings estimated). ' 5. Meet with Mark Koegler, Steve Hanson and Jim Lasher who will serve as contributors to the planning process. 6. Develop Alternative Highway 101 Alignments based on anticipated land use patterns, land use impacts and general access needs. 7. Identify Neighborhood Park and Open Space Needs, the resale/reuse potential of remnant parcels, ponding needs and pedestrian access needs. 8. Develop and Define Roadway Geometries, right-of-way width needs, and ' approximate construction costs associated with Highway 101 improvements. 9. Develop and Illustrate a Roadway Crossection for Highway 101 (landscaping and median characteristics) and a plan for roadway aesthetics and entry features. This will address the Planning Commission's concerns for a south entry to downtown Chanhassen. ' 10. Develop a Land Use and Access Plan for the Corridor indicating the types of land uses that should be accommodated throughout the corridor, access plans and roadway phasing. ' 2 I • 11. Meet With the City Staff (8 meetings estimated) and Mn DOT (2 meetings with MnDOT estimated) as necessary to solicit input and review plan alternatives and recommendations. ' 12. Prepare a Written and Graphic Recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council by March 31, 1989 regarding the I proposed Trunk Highway 212 Official Mapping. 13. Present the Trunk Highway 212 Recommendations to the Planning Commission (April 5) and City Council (April 10) for review and acceptance. , 14. Present the Corridor Plan at a Public Hearing on the Official Map for Trunk Highway 101. _ 15. Present the Plans at up to Two (2) Informal Public Meetings. 16. Present the Trunk Highway 101/5 Preliminary Alignment and Land Use Plan to the Planning Commission, City Council, Park Board and HRA for consideration and approval (4 meetings estimated). 17. Prepare a Brief Summary Report documenting recommendations and appropriate support information for the Trunk Highway 101/5 Preliminary Alignment and Land Use Study. Our Team will include BRW who will be responsible for evaluating alternative alignments, establishing roadway geometries and assessing preliminary construction costs related to the Highway 101 alignment. , The fee for the above services will be in the range of $20,000 to $27,000 Y y The reason for the range is the significant uncertainty associated with how much we might have to get into the geometries of the Highway 101/212 interchange. If we can avoid that, and we so intend, we will be nearer the low end of the range. 3 I 1 . . .We will bill the City on an hourly plus expenses basis per our 1989 hourly rate schedule. We propose to complete the work sufficiently to make a recommendation to the City by March 31, 1989 on the proposed Trunk ' Highway 212 Official Mapping provided no significant interchange adjustments are forthcoming from the study. The total study will be completed within 120 days of authorization to proceed. If you have questions, please call me at your earliest convenience. We ' look forward to commencing the project as soon as possible. • Sincerely, Fred Hoisington Consultant 1 I 1 4 J i U' ir . .. ' \ .,i_ ,„,_;J : .- r. . ■ ■ , ..'; -- • YAAOL■ ' . ,.- -'. ./' '''':71f. .1,11011p,* I k ___.•. _ . .„, 0,• dor 174., I ----__\ ai 4111,11‘ . ,i • ..ita its 1 44„ms ,.....*, .ii ,,, _ __. , -,.. ,410. P ..„R , ,-..,.....■-•-,-••••1...S. ' :641, 4 CIRCLE .- . -'•; I , Rs • .• LAKE SUSAN if,._,■-ijrio, Adoik , ____A __. 7.---- -,--- ,„" • . RD -14Yr 7. ' ' qlr- :'' RICE AI - - SI? , - 4 i .* ),_. .....__ , / / --=:-=;-- , \ .. ..\.,_- .._,,.. . . _„.2t. r - . , ''. 111 , . ..s.,/ ,- -•-- --. __.._ ... Ir. ..1..... .■■• ....sw 7.7._=..r.-___. , _ .. . ,,„,,. --R 4_ - --I . ,..., ,s,„ . ---4-As • . . cgs '. U D-R . . . . • P 8 Ad.-, 9.f. . s. _ R SF . • . R 12 „. ---1 . ,.: . - • • :- 4 - RSF . • p0,4,0 — , • . .. . . ncc ...00-0HA c-;.1111 . P-77-N• 6 e . .. • • , _ . .,. f o , t - - I 6 k A VA R D !. . l'Age: ' "- - -- 111 fit; 4 _ .... c: rsi); RD .----- ... 1 1 . .a. . \ A2 ' . PUD- " ...... ..... . - - - i . II ... _. ._ 0........ . ..e .....c.,,,,,., 4...... •, ...1:• •. 41?,pi ........hp& i , ONO , LAKE _.., ,.) •f \ • _ . 1 ..,„.. -• - - - . v it h' I L I Y i • . • • SF 11 > i• • _ .. .z . , ... . I _. ,.. _, • ' % .. \ . ... (.... ) • . . I ' .• ,i•" 1 \ t- t..• ' i \ A\ • . 111 ..N Ill I I I I 1 air . I • _+,` iI 1 t • • • \ ,.� \/ tif' �; + y- .. -- , C- —r - - �• ✓, .e' Y W \V/ •• ;•. . r ' r •� . tP ;,f i ter+' dl,f'• y 't V V• •a O o• '-... fff r':'M .. sr /•�)H , r ' /,-6 /. 11.E/ /t r • c nx vitw t 0 g, • r.,....... ..... .. .. c:3 , .. , _, ,.. . .., •= _ ___,..,.7_,•(_7•2f)p. F . . ! . r; ....,.., t Csarsx viEvr v t� �C• /a• f :. r ,•r.,. Y v.emu o I Lc1 sl wl C.ACCA nnb• , y r..0 1 III ..r 4 I. -00,---., ^• fN .` ra.,..•o I. r.w♦ rw w!'- ir, '�•!�� . ^I tc.1 J.! F' ���� pyS I —-I.....„„•;C:171:7,---3— . . . . • t.rte � I O ,f. .•% •wt•• h•r•': • + �% �r,p. = •••.]I.l. Lw\L. 6 • ' S „w",..tr ' + • V t f S1 C;' � ' '; , • ~�0� uEE.— 'sly ;# TIER :�� ' ��% .1:3:1^.• ' ' / . ♦' 7'.' O , <'r EVFIOPMENT��O . � •rr,),r I f ID \ DRK-\. t\%.,0 / � D r 1 -� ' I v ' � ra , � r ' / rr l \ f ' ........I t fo t �‘• o � f • J 1 I • . ,•I, t 7 f y �i�r•fr. :.- s c r!c LJ•, ut r—I,fL(. \f\ 8H 1 ,,•----• 3r_ • i l '- , ( \ •c. ____, „,,,, ,,t. „ .\,.., .,,,, ,. ,,__ , 4,,, r a 1 40. (440 1 /�/ v/a,/.a/ °t ,r . �J•l / % t i /./71. 14, 4/ i; 1:: � V llE`s 4 . -r 1•a�b 3 • �•• \ t , n /• ' ; t •is 01 5.4.e.„,,,-..0 4 'fr ���•, 7 ----•-.._.. . N, rO •1 •• — — ` n /.t I pit! - 1.• L.'fi" I. ,.r- °,y \ \°.6. \ .j \ r • t. . tf L ' ge • Ir s �f `,• , Y f/ IS r tt li II r I •• - LC+O' Ic t , I. -... P ii �•I //a /, i` TEMPORARY `�•. . •• _!_ _ .,;�J . CONNECTION• • •' / 1 '- , ' // - \�. /Z� 1 II 1