The URL can be used to link to this page

9. Consideration of Misc Items for Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance _...I \ y:�n I ' /1. C cl , CITY OF .: \i ‘lki - CHANHASSEN 1 ,„,s: __ _ ,.. < 7:/-7_ -.,4. . 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 IMEMORANDUM __G.!: __ IITO: Don Ashworth, City Manager FROM Planning Staff bite s �;nrtt-n , // 1 DATE: November 30, 19 8 7 . p�.--2g-e7 - '7 SUBJ: Zoning Ordinance Amendments - Discussion -j 5 II �- On October 28 and November 4, 1987, the Planning Commission r4= discussed several possible zoning ordinance amendments on sub- II jects that had arisen during review of previous applications and subjects that the Planning Commissioners wanted to be discussed. The City Council should review and discuss the attached material I in order to provide direction, to staff for preparation of a zoning ordinance amendment: The following subjects were reviewed: II • 1 . 150 Lot Depth I2 . Fences 3 . Accessory buildings 1 4 . Treated wood 5 . Amateur radio towers I6 . Demolition debris disposal I7 . Architectural exterior standards 8 . Lot width requirements on cul-de-sacs and flag lots I The attached report to the Planning Commission dated October 22, 1987, reviews each of the subjects in detail . The comments from the Commission on each subject have been added after each sub- , ject. ATTACHMENTS I1 . Planning Commission report. 2 . Information on testing treated wood. 3 . Planning Commission minutes dated October 28 and November 4, I 1987 . 11 r C CITY OF 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Staff DATE: October 22, 1987 SUBJ: Zoning Ordinance Amendments - Discussion The Planning Commission at the August 26 , 1987, meeting iden- tified several items for staff to evaluate for potential zoning ordinance amendments. The following addresses a majority of the items identified on August 26th ( the PUD discussion is not included in this memo, but will be scheduled in the near future) . The Commission also wanted to hear maintenance staff comment on cul-de-sac islands . Jerry Schlenk, Street Superintendent, will be in attendance Wednesday evening to speak to this issue as to whether or not this would be appropriate policy. Review 150 Foot Lot Depth Requirement At the October 14 , 1987, Planning Commission meeting, the Commission discussed this item and directed staff to prepare a map showing lot widths in existing subdivisions in the city. Attached is a map which for the most part pertains to those areas north of Highway 5 . In those areas where lots were created as part of the old PUD ' ordinance (Pheasant Hill, Fox Hollow, Hidden Valley, Triple Crown, Chaparral, Chanhassen Estates and Near Mountain) lot widths tended to be smaller, 130 to 150 feet in depth because lot size requirements were below 15, 000 square feet. In older sub- divisions of the city such as the north side of Lake Minnewashta, the west side of Minnewashta Parkway, and the area north of down- lot depths tended to average 130 to 140 feet. However, these subdivisions tended to have 100 to 110 foot lot widths to maintain the 15 , 000 square foot lot size. Recent subdivisions that contain the 150 foot lot depth are Shadowmere subdivision, Saddlebrook, and the Curry Farms subdivision. This analysis points to the fact that despite the lot depth, the overriding determinant in lot depth will be the lot size require- ment. If 90 feet of frontage is required as well as 15, 000 square I I 3' r I Planning Commission October 22, 1987 ' Page 2 feet is required, at least 167 feet of lot depth will be created. The advantage of reducing the lot depth is to provide flexibility in subdivision design. As long as the minimum lot size requirement is kept at 15,000 square feet either the lot width dimension or the ' lot depth dimension will have to be adjusted. 150 Lot Depth: The Commission agreed that the lot depth should be reduced to 125 feet. ' Fences ' The Planning Commission discussed amending the fence ordinance to prohibit barbed wire fences in the residential districts. The current Zoning Ordinance does not specifically prohibit barbed ' wire fences (Attachment #1) . The ordinance does prohibit fences with exposed barbed ends. The fence ordinance requires a fence permit for all fences installed for any other purpose other than an agricultural purpose. The Commission was concerned with barbed wire fences being used for the pasturing of horses in residential areas and also used on the larger residential lots to prevent trepassing. ' Staff recommends that the fence ordinance be amended to add Section 6-12-11 titled Prohibited Fences, which would state "The use of barbed wire fences is prohibited in the residential, commercial ' and industrial districts . Barbed wire fences are permitted in the agricultural districts . Barbed wire fences may be permitted in commercial and industrial districts with a conditional use ' permit. Staff wanted to make sure that the prohibition of the barbed wire ' fences was not in conflict with the Horse Ordinance. In review of the Horse Ordinance, staff found that the ordinance does not require any type of fencing. Therefore, preventing barbed wire fences for use with private or commercial stables in residential areas will not be in conflict with the Horse Ordinance. The Horse Inspector, Mr. Headla, has stated that electrical fences are preferred over barbed wire fences in that they are less dangerous to horses and to children attracted to the horses . Fences: The Commission agreed that fence ordinance should be ' amended to add Section 6-12-11, titled "Prohibited Fences" , which would state, "the use of barbed wire fence is prohi- bited in the residential, commercial, and industrial districts. Barbed wire fences are permitted in the agri- ' cultural districts. " The Planning Commission added the following sentence, "Barbed wire fences may be permitted in commercial and industrial districts with a conditional use permit. " 1 ' 3 Planning Commission October 22 , 1987 Page 3 ' Accessory Buildings The Planning Commission requested staff to review adding a maxi- , mum square footage for accessory buildings in the urban area. The Planning Commission felt that the current ordinance which limits accessory buildings to 30% of the rear yard area does not prevent large lots surrounded by single family development from having large accessory buildings that may be detrimental to surrounding properties. A typical urban lot has a 30 by 90 foot rear yard which equals 2 , 700 square feet and 30% of this equals 810 square feet. Staff recommends that 800 feet be established as the maximum square footage for accessory buildings in the rear yard area for urban single family lots. Staff feels that 800 square feet will be adequate for most accessory buildings which are proposed on urban single family lots . Typically, the accessory buildings that are requested in the single family urban developments range around 120 square feet. Staff recommends amending Section 5 , Accessory Structures , by adding the following: 6-5-2 A detached accessory structure may occupy not more than thirty ( 30% ) of the area of any rear yard, provided that no detached accessory structure shall be placed nearer than 5 feet from any rear lot line, and provided that no acessory structure located in the RSF and R-4 Districts will be larger than 1000 square feet (Attachment #2) . Accessory Buildings: The Commission agreed that the sentence should be added to Section 6-5-2, that would state, "that no accessory structure located on the RSF and R-4 Districts would be larger than 1000 square feet." Treated Wood Staff has contacted the Environmental Protection Agency and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to receive information on treated wood. Staff has attached for review information provided by one company that makes treated wood for construction of buildings and docks, etc. (Attachment #3 ) . As of today, neither the Environmental Protection Agency or the MN Pollution Control Agency have determined that treated wood is harmful and that it should not be used when it comes in contact with water. Until further documentation can be provided, staff cannot recommend amending the ordinance to prohibit treated wood. Staff will con- tinue working with the MN Pollution Control Agency and the Environmental Protection Agency to determine how it can be proven that the wood is safe to use in water and to verify whether it is safe or harmful to the environment. Treated wood: The Commission agreed that an ordinance amend- ment is not required at this time until definite facts are 1 Planning Commission October 22 , 1987 Page 4 ' available which determine that treated wood is harmful to the environment. Attachment #2 is information on testing treated wood which the city could pursue if interested. ' Amateur Radio Towers The Planning Commission recently reviewed a conditional use per- ' mit for the addition of an antenna and a radio tower for a total of three towers on one urban single family lot. At the time of application, the Zoning Ordinance did not allow the city to limit the number of towers on a single family lot. The Commission ' requested staff to review the FCC regulations to determine whether or not we could in fact limit the number of towers on a single family lot. Staff and the City Attorney have reviewed the FCC regulations and found that the FCC regulations pre-empt the city regulations if ' the city regulations prohibit the installation of any amateur radio tower (Attachment #4 ) . The city is still permitted to regulate height, landscaping, aesthetic conditions and safety factors . There is nothing in the FCC regulations that pre-empt ' city regulations from limiting the number of towers on a single family lot. The important factor is that the city allow the applicant reasonable use with an amateur radio tower. Staff con- tacted an employee of the FCC in Washington, D.C. to confirm whether or not the city could implement an ordinance to limit the number of towers on a single family lot. The FCC stated that they do not regulate the number of towers, they only want to ensure that the city allows the property owner reasonable use with an amateur radio tower. Staff feels that allowing a single family lot one amateur radio tower does permit the applicant ' reasonable use. Staff recommends that the Zoning Ordinance be amended to limit the number of amateur radio towers and individual antennas to one per urban single family lot. Staff is recommending Section 21, Antennas and Satellite Dishes be amended as follows: ' Section 6-21-1 ( 1) No satellite dish or antenna shall be located within the required front or side yard setback. A maximum of one radio tower or individual antenna shall be located on an urban single family lot. ' Amateur radio towers: The Commission agreed that a section should be added limiting the number to one radio tower or one individual antenna in all residential districts. Demolition Debris Disposal The City Council requested staff to review standards for ' developers to follow when they remove existing structures on p k t- Planning Commission October 22, 1987 Page 5 construction sites . The Council is concerned that there are no 11 controls over where such debris can be buried. There are no controls to prohibit them from being buried near streams, high water tables, etc. Staff has obtained regulations for demolition debris land diposal facilities from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (Attachment #5) . These guidelines are used for projects involving more than 15,000 cubic yards of demolition debris and which are open 12 months a year. The facilities that are regu- lated by the Pollution Control Agency are facilities used for municipalities, organizations, or individuals having substantial volume of material from demolition construction projects including earth, rocks, stones, trees, old bituminous surfacing, concrete, bricks, lumber, plaster, metal, glass and plastic building parts. The demolition land disposal facilities do not include wastes from operations of households, commercial establishments, institutions, industrial processes, agricultural facilities, and municipalities such as garbage, dead animals, paper, food, beverage containers, tires, septic tank pumpings, etc. Although the Pollution Control Agency guidelines are for large facilities, some of the guidelines can be applied by the City for individual debris landfills . The following are regulations from the Pollution Control Agency which staff feels can be applied to individual debris landfills . 1 . The fill and trench areas of a demolition debris land dispo- sal facility are prohibited within the following areas: a . 1000 feet from the normal high water mark on a lake, pond, or flowage. b. 300 feet from a stream c . regional flood plain d. wetlands e . within 50 feet of the property line ' 2 . An area where the high water table is within 5 feet of the lowest high water elevation. 1 3 . The demolition debris shall be compacted as densely as prac- tical and covered with a minimum of six inches compacted suitable cover material. 4 . Surface water drainage shall be diverted around and away from the landfill. C ' Planning Commission October 22, 1987 ' Page 6 Staff is recommending that should construction debris be proposed to be buried on a site within the City of Chanhassen that the ' applicant must receive a demolition debris landfill permit from the city. The applicant must provide plans showing the location of the landfill site and details on exactly what will be buried ' at the site. The permit application would have to provide infor- mation on whether there are hazardous wastes such as paints or pesticides located in the building and how those would be disposed of. The permit would allow the city to guarantee that ' the landfill is located in a suitable location and that hazardous wastes or other unsuitable materials would not be buried on the site. The permit procedure would also allow the city to know what exactly is being buried on sites within the city and to maintain a record of where such disposal sites exist. ' Demolition debris disposal: The Commission agreed that the ordinance should be amended as recommended by staff. ' Architectural Exterior Standards The Planning Commission expressed the desire to encourage better ' architectural appearance of structures within the city. As you are aware, a committee has been established to evaluate the current building code standards . One of its recommendations was to adopt "Appendix E" which required sprinklered buildings for ' commercial and industrial occupancies . Another tool which can be used is amending the Zoning Ordinance to establish a performance standard for architectural exteriors . ' Attached are two examples of this type of requirement. Minnetonka and Eden Prairie both have similar language with Eden Prairie' s being more specific. This provision eliminates construction of metal buildings/pole barns, and encourages a better appearance. It is recommended that the ordinance be amended to include language ' similar to the attached examples, with final language to be reviewed by the Planning Commission. ' Architectural exterior standards: The Commission agreed that architectural exterior standards should be provided in the Zoning Ordinance. Lot Width Requirements on Cul-de-sacs and Flag Lots There are several options involved with this issue (graphics will be presented at the meeting) . ' Cul-de-sacs - 1 . Enforce 90 foot lot width at 30 foot setback line. Planning Commission October 22, 1987 Page 7 2 . Enforce 90 foot lot width at proposed building line. 3 . Enforce 90 foot lot width at proposed building setback line but establish a minimum arc length along the cul-de-sac. 1 . This option maintains the current ordinance. After surveying other communities, it was found that this was a typical method for cul-de-sac lots. This option achieves the intent of creating adequate separation between adjacent structures. Any deviation must be processed as a variance. 2 . Staff designated this option as the "floating setback" option. It would permit the placement of the home anywhere on the lot where the 90 foot lot width can be achieved. While this pro- vides flexibility in lot design, it would be difficult to enforce and monitor. 3 . This option would require establishing specific minimum arc lengths along the cul-de-sac. However, this would in essence be the same as Option 1 in that the arc length established would determine what the lot width would be at the 30 foot setback line. Therefore, an arc length of 50-50 feet would dictate a 90 foot width at the setback line. Flag Lots - Flag lots are typically defined as those which have a narrow strip ( "handle" ) of property leading to the larger part of the lot ( "flag" ) . Usually, flag lots are not encouraged in urban service areas as they encourage double tiering of lots and are not conducive to efficient utility planning. However, flag lots have been approved in the rural area since the "handle" could become part of a future roadway. Further, on rare occa- sions flag lots have been created in the urban service area depending on unique circumstances . Most municipal subdivision ordinances discourage flag lots for the reasons cited above. An option to consider would be to establish criteria or "situations" where flag lots would be acceptable (rural area, topography, etc. ) . Another option is to continue the current practice of granting variances where unique circumstances exist. Lot width requirements on cul-de-sacs and flag lots: The ' Commission agreed that the lot widths should remain the same and continue to be measured at the front lot line and that flag lots should not be permitted. The Commission also stated that flag lots could be permitted only if there is a hardship that exists and that staff should provide guidelines, such as minimum widths, for flag lots. The graphics referred to earlier will be presented at the Council meeting. ' Planning Commission October 22, 1987 Page 8 ATTACHMENTS 1 . Fence Ordinance. 2 . Accessory Building Ordinance. 3 . Information on Treated Wood. 4 . FCC Regulations. 5 . MN Pollution Control Agency - Demolition Debris Information. 6 . Planning Comission minutes dated August 26, 1987, and map of ' lot depths. 7 . Architectural standards from Minnetonka and Eden Prairie. 1 1 1 ., _ il 4 3 . Existing Porches. Porches that encroach into the required front yard and which were in existence as of II 1 the effective date of the zoning code may be enclosed or completely rebuilt in the same location provided that any porch that is to be completely rebuilt must I have at least a 10-foot minimum front yard. 4. In Rear Yards. Subject to the setback requirements cited in Article Vi, Section 5, the following are II permitted in the rear yard: enclosed, open off-street parking spaces; accessory structures, toolrooms, and similar buildings or structures for domestic storage. II Balconies, breezeways and open porches, unenclosed 11 decks and patios, and one-story bay windows may project into the rear yard a distance not to exceed five (5) feet. I SECTION 12 . FENCE AND WALLS 6-12-1 Intent: The intent of these regulations is to provide I standards for fences along the perimeter of lots that act as boundaries and/or barriers. i 6-12-2 Permit: A fence installed for any purpose other than an agricultural purpose- shall obtain a building permit before installation. I 6-12-3 Location: All fences shall be located entirely upon the • property of the fence owner unless the owner of the II adjoining property agrees, in writing, that said fence may be erected on the property- line of the respective properties. Such an agreement shall be submitted at the time of building permit application. I 6-12-4 Site Plan: A site plan showing location of t be submitted with the permit application, the fence shall I 6-12-5 Surveys: The Building Official may require a fence ermit application to provide a registered land survey P establishing property lines. I 6-12-6 Construction and Maintenance: Every fence shall be I constructed in a substantial, workmanlike manner and of ill material reasonably suited for the purpose for which the fence is proposed to be used. Every fence shall be maintained in such condition as to not become a hazard, II eyesore, or public or private nuisance. All fences shall be constructed so that the side containing the framing supports and cross pieces face the interior of the fence owner's lot. Any fence which does not comply with the I provisions of this Ordinance or which endangers the public safety, health or welfare shall be considered a public nuisance. Abatement proceedings may be instituted by the ' 31 proper City official after fifteen (15) days notification, -96- 1 il SECTION 2 . OVERHEAD TRANSMISSION LINES Installation of overhead transmission lines in excess of 69 kilovolts shall require the issuance of a conditional use permit through any district located in the City. The City Council, in addition to the standards established in Article 3 , Section 2 also impose other conditions as deemed necessary to maY public health, safety and welfare. Y Protect the SECTION 3 . NOT MORE THAN ONE PRINCIPAL BUILDING ON A LOT In any single family detached residential district not more than one principal building shall be permitted to be erected on a singl building lot. Grouping of buildings in other districts may only be permitted by conditional use permit. SECTION 4. TEMPORARY STRUCTURES AND USES The City may authorize as a conditional use the temporary use of a structure or premises in any district for a purpose does not conform to the regulations prescribed for the district in which the property is located, provided that such use is of a necessary and temporary nature and does not involve the erection o: a substantial structure or substantial alteration of the premises. The City Council may grant a conditional use permit for such use for not more than 12 months. SECTION 5. ACCESSORY STRUCTURES 6-5-1 A detached accessory structure, except a dock, shall located in the buildable lot area or required�rear yard. Nc accessory use or structure in any residential district ' shall be located in the required front or side yard. 6-5-2 A detached accessory structure may thirty percent 30% Y occu PY not more than that no detached accessory estructure ashallabeyplacedrneirer than five feet from any rear lot line. nearer ' 6-5-3 In any residential district, no accessory building or structure shall be erected or constructed prior to the erection or construction of the principal or main building but may be erected simultaneously. SECTION 6. SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS ' All single family detached homes shall : 6-6-1 Be constructed upon a continuous perimeter foundation that meets the requirements of the State Uniform Building Code. 1 -89- 1 • I I • • ..• f . r •• # - ® OPP' i . I I I ,A • l ) IA ti i• ) sl. I \,.....,s,,, , ,......1 TM brand - _ - - 'v, t.-- v • ..... ,sr, ,-.., , t I - z, - T.., .... ,_ [ T ,_, F. - : -.7. - ' i 7 __ , _ , ----t : -_, ,t, : I '-'- - ''' . ----,. .4-- -,:-._. _ if.,..4..,t,-. .- 4r tti ."- - x • . -1,' • • ..0. ,C,. ...- .S.,44 4.A.'". . 32., 11,P-',..... "*-' -- 7- r.' *- V i' --•. ,,,,.•':$-'''''1)4-*e i 7...- .4.-4' :$1.'trra -t.;''-='-*311-;.Wk - -- s.,-- 7,1,>*-- A ,..-, -:,-_ -N4k'":14-4..s. ^,k---:A k :'',.; - ''" W.. ..,_ *-. ..... A-?:.- 17.....Mis.- -..%;4,:j.V ,4,- 1.r.:.:',:',"; .::.,..:.7'-'4; :---_,i-I `4 ---=;-; .;•-:a9-.„7,-.., ..tii &....;,41.t.1 ;• ' r.„..-TM -a,- -;,,,..-,.. cra , 5ii,)-,:-, ne-e;..,...,,,:.;-__ ill. • --..*7 - r ,,--1-,,,,.,- ,,. ,...,1i,.. .4.4r.:...a..-,x, s:,.;:,t,,,,--.. I-, 1.,....-.•' . t , • 4.7g-tA IP''r4 7' ' '•k''..Zt•-'''.47*. .A* *VJ't,?.*V.4.1q;:P.-.W '. **-.1.'' f j--', -,;:,:: ':,-'- : ---1,.? -:-14i V.r -,F,i-,-'vvr-.1-V.!.;'g,1::...,."..., '''';,,:i'L,. ..-,..;5,-.......i.-''•-i,.4.r.,'-.-. ,e. ' : -..., '..k.:u---, ,:.--- ' -- _._;-,..,.-_- v-e:--,r...t.vJ ..'-‘3,..:1•4- V: -j --- 4' 444;%4**alz-ji,z,- W-', . . 3 1-% ..c.A.-!:! .•'1::-';' i -.-i V.:.V. I r ztre.........„ 4 i- ..r.ril":14.Y, Ir•- .t44e.'' 71"-V,,S*± .20.14,,.,',/ Zir ,:.r:• , , - ,- -- - I - •_ -.,,. .k---4- - it.W,,?...,..,, . t.....,17.1-7,4: -„.,..,,4 ,,."----A,,,)•t_..4.7.,.5„,-vit. .V.`4' -t-4--,-. Y.*IT-c-f• -- - '1" -.-tr-'7.-.' ;•-='7':•:.-'-"I ' .S1r :" '...j!:'-'1.-ii 4 a r-"Pri.4, "- ''* *;'•' ..:;17,14.,t..' ,"..,,--- --'1, t-i,„,_,Ir',o...-'1'..-'4-t•?,4tf.*I'l • '';,. ..-'.-,;37-7'",',f,'11.- _,,,.."• - . •. "-S,-v • ii.';'.e.1,4-1,341.1. . -A t 1.„,S-42,-i*U:74.1-3t Itf `-'.'t"'..,, .---- ."1 '*.144,-...;7- 14,51,1 -1 - ,-‘,-, fr‘,...-! - ::,...,1 -' --r.t...„..„ ---II '- . .".---- -.,„ -,--4-4c,-,-,,-‘,1,..54----c-I'we,-,...;- -- 9: ,4 - ,,..'22,,y-:.-f. ,c• -_ .,,,... ...,...,....... ,.-*; lix-i-,:z:, ,-.6, ,,,,,,,, 1-5,-4..vc-4,.,. 2.--3.,-. - , - t...i...:-1-,-__ - - W- 1' .r.ele-°' 5e. " ''''',L'% 4-.11-*---,r,5' '`,.-..''.-i ' ''-' c-.--1‘,`"- ' ----, .,' er.g;1;42.-,:45,,4-.---_,0,,.;,,t7-41, i-,i.-.I,7V---- •=4,k,&,-g- . -:•.. ' ..' -rir_.1 le :, ..,,.-.g.-_ -,........rlt -7.5:v..-tiwir., - - ..,..t..,.. = .„„... ,i '----..4.4°' ''...k 7.-... :7-,r•tA0-4'04" **.ft•f• *kb.'-.-4 - _ t-4?-...:i ' r---11 ,-_---Tbc:-:-..,-,• . , .s•--1,..--_-,4.-------s I-- ••,.. _ . --, : . • ....,?..!..4:474. , __,.., .1--_-1,.....,,A,..-.4='--- --, .7,-i..-4.--* .V.-..;:-....,N•"- :-.-1 -".;:If'''. -----4'' : '- ' ;- -, ■-' ',.. ---,‘,.......".e.'s. Is...1 -A--,-- ,,. I...W. fit It'., -,.. ----P.- .2-1.„„...W,:-..-",-2.r.,..4.4,-71*.2'^■ ...4I'!",-,?I" '-:. .'' * . •' --.. _Atallf-=-';-,- ' 4.' 0 -x..A„.„,„-;4,_ , _,....,,‘--,-!...4••••_-. ,.., ',,.",■`. ■-•-'`. 4.- '-- :--, '..' r T.,, ,,,,,I, ..) ....:--.. • :.,C' .r.r..,,. , „.1 . k-•-f-...‘147.1 -- ' -,..--- --, -, ..., --•-'-:,1:-.4.1 gi.1, WS. :,r, ........ *"'...-4r. ....;1^...^...-.„, . ' .. .,,,•'-')-- *'4 *-- !.:•TA ' , /E.-V....• -,,,_.....-- - ''--,-, - .a.,,,.. c.'' ' ,...1.4.,..4- .,,*;•,1";'''...*.-1,..."-.....,...%.4.....-`0*X- '4-414.**:k-e,-..3.*SV,..*.,'„ a-4.:, I.-. -9;.:, ...-.• . - , ..-"- .. --*.-- ., ----../7.16 .•*. '-.7 * ''' -• *41.-.^'- '-`;.'4-7."*" ',I' g 1,-‘..:----, :,•:-.-`..,--- -•;:zi ._._.-_ ,. .._.„,.,.,-v. _ . ,-,.....,,, ''''''''',4'.;--'!..1"1'. . ,A: ; •"4 :1.:Ini.:3%-:. ',i.r- ; ..c,v,e11,-....?, :_;--_,:.,e.5,.-.,', ...' iL-e : 15t-1,0a-v,--eN,3,-IT ,-,,,, ,-1,!:-f:,71- -r •. 4 ,-t.' ,va*:---1-41 Ilsp,ri,'A --:''''' ,...r..w... _, -.,.._. .. -.. ..,„.,..:4-.;:., .s,....,-..,„.:.,...1.::.,__ ;:..,,...._:__ .1-...- - _......,:. -:-.,-z4_ ,-,,,. i r...v,....: _li :„...._. .,i.,....,.- ., .....,.... .:vs„ „.4 „..,;.1„......,.. _18.;?,, ,.s.,:,1-4„.:s„...1, ..-_-„,. _z,,_.,s_,.:5_: ..?„... __ __.„....„ .i.,,-;,.., .4....... . 4., 1 i -...„ „.,.... ,. ... _. 7-4- --„ ---_g_wortt,11-7,?:,. ,.:iWz.;,,=-4,,,,,,...g.,..,w.,,-;,?..,?:„.E; ..,:.::,-.---;-,---_-,--_!-., .`•, -,../ __::, -_ . -4,i- ::.f - I---,t- 1-"..--- t-iii i ....,.=-1.v.r„. .._...„.„.,.....-..,40:4 t;--A.`t-iv: 5, .;<=-'-.:,.7-,-k,w.r,z;" ,‘'.•qt ; ,.."-. ---,Irk-',4‘, ;---A e• -.. - _ 4-.-::...--,C 1-.,..:...,V ; a...--, =V. . w- elf, -V -, --rirs--"," • -,..V,4*- _ „_-..,-,...Z.A1".,-.21. ----,,,o,„. ' ' I . . --,-.- A ' •• it _ '•-•.-',-,X74,-..,;...- '5:. ti lit- -4 r- 44';-.;'' ! .1',''',4.1; , , tt- " ---.',-•-• 1144.4.'*" -,'.-1,' i : `. .- .,'- %,. , ■- -,.°51.,e,,,z.,.., I .,.. ,y . ■,,,, ;- - ..,-,,. " .,.,...tgri..,, ri..-=--,--,..-4.4 sa-z: .-., ,,r -.5, - •I --"Y '-r i _ 5 - - -..-.11/4.,..-.\-V. --..• 4.7-.7' -A tk --„,,,.,,ipitzia'''--,.....4--,„--A-..- - - ---- •'-` '.'----"-- --.. - .-----17--‘- - ,.-.."-_....., ...-"--=7.-.-- ,,..-f'4'... i-- • - " 1 V. ,'•". , •-, .;-:-: ,.....,...----4-t-f .t.A9.v.:-.4.i _ - --- "4.7 1 f ‘ [ • F: . ,:_,.1 .,..w...., ,...t-s ....,--,.,m,1 1., pt. ,,....1: ..,, „..\-aL. sf.„.,.... ,,..-_.. '7.,:f-, . ,.. _... - .-: ..t to ,..--. ....' ,' AI ,..'. -11;t:'''','-''- /-' ;.----4i-- "-:•:'" -" - -• ''''''• f:'!"' I ' ---'''?'=" 2.1."-- " 1 r -Lt --;,.1.` •tf .."4:: -:1"P--kk=';.- -: -`''-3-0"t -. .--- s--,' i 1 .....-, - .......,., f- ..._, „...,...---,,,4‘..___.;..,, „.,..,_„. ..... ,,-:-..----I+, -‘----".--.--.%-- .-'' ...`"" - Lk. -"`Is'-',' t, „cr ' - 1---- I.!.- .-...',„f7;-14, . . ", - - ' • -t-14u ' .7',,, • fk . -.3 I., , thl „-..., _. - - _ , -, • - .-,--t4 - -- . ..... ,,,,„.1.:..k.,1 • ... . .. .._ ,,..cz --,,. '. ...,,,,,. ....., ..:,,, ,.....,, . ... .... ...„....„...„ . ,_ _., ,..,,,....„..... 1,,, 4, ,r,,,,.. ,_ ,..... ,..,...„ =„ ....., . ..„. ___,..„: . .. 4..............-- i ........„„„,- .;_,,,,. .-4,,:., - . ,,, .r."-•.--- , .., 44'. _....--.'7'..--• "'- "' - ' .---,t , • - ; , '. ..-.,- 1 -,. .......-"- ...11L. ---1'''s li 1 -- '.'.*: il 7- 7 '....•et _, ..___ . ___ - - ... . _..,..,-„,,,,,,,,.•.. ......„„ .._., . . c.,,,. :,___._ .., .g.....r.,.. .:. .._-„,.., _,...„. _ . .. ..„,„.. --`4,..; '''' -' - i • ,..,',. "1 ..."' -..• ..--'- - --- •00 1111 ., ,,..7 7.., ' -, .. ' , '..,1 •gi,.; .,,, -•.•. „,,,..t.,_ t , .. \- . -. -s --__„„,--..,,,,ess...,_. ..g.„,,,,,,.1,- '? :r-V : • r-. ' ,.. .;114 .F... ' •1- 't.tt'' - -- ' 4, .._..... -'-'-'' ...„.- ;;;,-....-,-;"- .„3„.....--_11.10 , ,....,,:, ..,-..",*11:c 'f, - --- - -4 -ilk.,i ..---. • ‘, A ‘ • -- ,..---' 0.----i'.. ."''''' -- .1"- '"'..^-s.-- •'•---..-=.,-; .:3-... . - " , ,,....: ';‘.-:._-tr..;:ici.2, ..,,..--,Y,'-:".,--,;,-",4-...,1,5^,---.:.•;:,,,,, i'% 1..-.1. ,-;e44aw ..--,,,,-.., .,-...---,--. =,--..--;;; -.7.1.',!'---";.4....f-.'",-,--=!:,-, ..Z.-...-,-.•?--.,.,•7-r,y . 3 7t. a,Ix . . ,iie.,,m,-: -4. ,...;:ii,.....,..:., :‘ -,-.; , .......... ! '...... --e.:-.-...:-.... ■••;....,...5.-Z.”W.,,T.....,;..,--1-...."-- ---_,-":,,t,"...--_'.1....;4',',.'--.,,,;,,rt--1 •.,14.,%*1111.* , , ,-- • " ''-- ''' 5- ;:-7...72---;-, -, ',,.-,.."--,-.'7‘--,,r ",:,5.-.:7171..f4;..5. .55 '55Z,'. :..,-'- t . . :- .... ,...r ';-::%•t• -•:-. ,...,.. . - • • -- •;IA&- ,- •-•+4,114t, .. • -'...--..•:' .'•..-,•• ----- .9 ---*,,^ -.4.t....4•7.•***,,'1,...... % •-■.,.... . 1::,---::•- ,,.. •••••-• ... ........:1,,...* ., ...'-',• •- _** ....- 1.••,..... .*Y...1..'.,..•4.1''--7-,'■r,, --'-.t ,,1.....,* ,.1.4-'- - '',-..' -: .... -,...E-"C:s'....1("r ".-... .'' --- • . - h. ,,.....;;:•-)-,7`.' ', , *",-.1*.....:---':a 7 - -'.- -..-,' -,'--:. ..-."..r "..-'', ., .:-... •,, - ... - • - ..-.:"---:.„.. ......0 ----,•9*-4P.T9m, .-'`....•- -•••:. .: -., -=-,„Ar.--- . ' - - - . '- . -- . .;;z:,---;t" '."--4' --"-- -1.......92- ----.. -• . -- -,- .- - .. , . s ,t,'-.•- '‘-.-:-It.:".0 -.'`'.‘4,c: .- 4-i-zex t t'',..--,- .4 . .- - . .• • ` - -'"‘- s--*.ar. -..., w.:,.,!,-, t-," ,Attitligl. . -.1-A ,'-';.:It*A•ri_ • .- , Filling The Need For Wood Protection „.,. , :,-.,...... :. In The Marine., Environment_ . . -,-..r..,..„,,,,,, ,.-....- ,--.-. ...::t....,.....,.. ..•... ...-, , ...,.. . • -:, ..... . .__.-,..-„,... ., ..------,„,- ,, ....:- .....„..-_,......„...,--..- .. ... . ....„.,____........,..-.,...., ...2._.. . .... -...... „.„..._.......„--,....„- ,....„ ... • .... ...,..., •,..4.4r.., . .,.....--. .• ,...t.,.. ..„ __A....-. 4....„...:.4 • .740'41 'e--v.4)1'41A-146..s•-•• .. 2.-1,- -,-1.'4,p.'t..,-,...C._,..._ e-w.,..- ,..-,_„ .. ,,,-.4A: . - t„,,,,,, ,cmosee_ ,_ wood products . ..................._______.... 1 Osmose® Wccd PrIDEI IaCtS . . t •ln.g Wfl aJ I Where The Water Meets The Land, The Effects Of IWind And Wave Can Be A Serious Problem. Our shorelines are constantly in a state of Osmose©pressure treated timbers, piling . ...-I flux. Nowhere is change more dramatic than in and lumber are ideal for building erosion con- j',,: ,a 7, I : : this interface between land and ocean.The #' }� ` ° ` trol structures. That's because Osmose has `'— ' constant actions of wind and current remove, '• ' ' -�' ' : ' carefully researched the problems and, just as .1: -;�•_ '-�I.s+,,r_ and replace, countless tons of material daily. ..,•-': Y carefully, introduced a marine-grade wood - ' ', Control of these effects to retain and reclaim product to withstand the extreme service and 1 Pik i �4 �: i I property is a never.ending battle a against lilt•i 3i'r ' ' _�'.= •-- • .-� .•g ga exposure conditions of salt-water en- �, ' , u = 1'' elemental forces. _ vironments. Current,wave action,marine : `� ' While build-up of.land masses is highly == _ gh Y borers..-.all have little,if any,effect against "'' iY1l_s'G I. _ = desirable,erosion is a problem of major pro- Osmose Wood Products. I portions.Erosion,in this context, is removal _ of solid materials from waterfront areas. In an ,•zl^•d ,la .a _ effort to slow down and stop k ` .,....:;:-'7,... .,) . 'fit ,' l forces,science and technology are these t.4 _ +�" 3) '�. a`M ,p1 t� " + `j ` - i to address this wide-spread problem. Man- " �'�u k •E i� j • �l made structures,at this juncture, only ice' _e6� *T -_. - -r`?t ' � -'.� can y r Kim.. . . . delay the ultimate ` _ _-.. ,.r- k _.. -: - F„___, Y goals of Mother Nature. _ . _�`+ '' ..- - That's why tk,,5.. , } ,rr•.,' ♦,:-F"• e y it's vital to the success of any ero- 4, - �;-. . ,� •i' . - ;t ,4 I sion control project to select materials tc"�: `�' �r :' ' designed to withstand these effects. .... -c' _ •, i~ - �_: 3 -. � f r' • jD� , s'F- r{ • rK 3t �ris%SR+;r T ?ti I , --- -P,+;,fycyc a+• yy'r x j4j' }i#��`! 1E1;t V "•�d33a - +4�y -,,--6,-.., , t.. Xa ''.02.4.1 .41.'?,-t Y�, lc,��+_: 4, _ ..+ i i e t.)., 1 `.:=•,,,= --w..._ -..„, - V = r ya.,-.� - _ .. e,'••< •��.4,- ,"-�'1t, "t'--• :'t,,,,1=' -fir.-'-:7,, \~'� � 4 ..� I ., I �� el lf.B�iit s` 1 1 ar..ti i . ''f.-.'.' t' " , •.- M•rT, �-..Y._„�,'F. ;',;11 .•; % ,, g F it - a -- T . n y, . �. `'e 1 T; i I' .',8![(°-ll.�t-•�}i::.�: "_-':r�-,�piySJ "r:... ,, i'1y r.. - F f^.. � K,__''' ' ' ~ ; � . ! ,• I. s • - -1 _ „-. --'-- ---;iL;v; {`Y.... ,� _ , - �. ,#.41,*R .Yip S,1,.. ""�a�'C`i. :, ,Iki l nY"a•,. fir_ , . _ -�• F 1 7 ,p, W.. —re- BULKHEADS AND SEAWALLS 1 Protect Banks and Bluffs From (�1LR CLaTN 1 Erosion 1 -TONGLIE GKOOV Olt• •BUILD HIGH ENOUGH TO PREVENT ''I'"-'. ` T 8HI LAP PILING- SPRING TIDES FROM PUSHING WAVES - - �,� OVER THE TOP OF SEAWALL OR �� BULKHEAD ;t'y' - yam.'•,. ` •ADD ROCK RIP RAP AT THE TOE OF `[ �' j; ,' _ SEAWALL TO PREVENT SCOURING ` rill _��J�tyy//•v ~.>;X�; - ACTION OF WAVES • f 1, n i'.k.•'ir• "i 4`.}t:� and *DRILL , WEEP HOLES NEAR BASE OF .�/.t/1,'/,k� -� _� i �''^•' SEAWALL TO REDUCE EXCESSIVE SOIL rry�r.Tl- �jyy,ItdQMJp ^• "'• 1 - - _ PRESSURE AND FOR DRAINAGE OF IP r•-^••• -- + +,.e- y ,• • I. 1 GROUND WATER r' - +�yu „y,/ �. • } •CONSIDER RUNNING FILTER MATERIAL ) i��A�I��` d~ " "-Ya .- _ • UP THE GRADE AS WELL AS BEHIND _ -� _.;�. :• ••0. ' F[Ili k SEAWALL 7HK WILL RETAIN MORE MATERIAL OVE0.A LONG PERIOD OF 1►fCGD 11N GG "'w •a- TIME 9.Garr rIVLL:J - ' •TAKE PRECAUTIONS TO PREVENT ERO- rehevt pTti eur ` �� 1 + ' BULKHEAD AT THE ENDS OF SEAWALL OR - Pj(n�/..T1ON ' D BULKHEAD ,EEl�J�1�, ' "-,.'.,''� • - , 7 y, V armor scour 4..,‘I ,Prtecion Th Maa' n EnvL . nment __ There Is No Exposure Condition Which Presents �.rt A Greater Hazard To Wood Than Salt Water Use. -µms_ Osmose Wood Products offer many advan- ". es to the Y. When you consider the complexity of the On the leading edge of wood preservation tag property owner. Especially in the intertidal environment,it's not too surprising technology, �P marine environment;decay, corrosive ef- rP g technolo the people at Osmose are work_ -�, Y Y to find out that ordinary wood just doesn't ing successfully to eradicate wood's inherent fects of salt water and wood-destroying stand a chance. Continual wet/d and =Y'=` ry weaknesses.We've known for a long time that - ' marine organisms multiply the problems faced freeze/thaw cycles promote decay and strut- our treated wood doesn't rot or decay.And, '' by ordinary, untreated wood. Osmose pro- tural failure. Marine borers destroy the wood the preservative protection built into every ducts,with a built-in resistance to marine from the inside as well as the outside. Once piece of Osmose wood will hold wood- hazards,can provide a timely and effective the wood is weakened by these organisms,the destroying marine o solution to water-oriented construction. ebb and flow of tidal forces can erode and long,long g time. � at bay for a -•g weaken the wood until it quite literally The technology is already in place and work_ disintegrates. ing for you. Our unique Osmose pressure /"- Molluscan treatment process and oxide-pure preservative ' V: results in a product far superior to ordinary - GrouP untreated wood;retains the strength of wood s. \\��; Enters Timbers TEREDO and the workability of wood minus the severe & Destroys Interior P (Shipworm) - =� s.. y nterior j P m) problems and environmental risks of other ;°� i Some Species Destroy ,` :Q PHOLADS treatment processes. '`3' Concrete,Soft Rock V F °"ice"";z'i.:-.: ---•i7,1/2 r_ _ _ _ .Crustacean Group Destroys Timbers 1,..:„,' LIMN 4�r...F.� � � By Surface Action SPHAEROMA Species Will Destroy Creosoted Timbers CHELURA �-- ,.. . .•�' . _.,.. l l I._� j 1.I `ir'i l .. , ;' r�''l it / -� : �,c: -,--- ' ., -..- -- Y�~' —2 i` `' 1 i� I 1 I' 111 •l1 I Jl) '/I( / --..r--_t'4'il _+ S t - mac.\ 1. i it- _ ��`��/'�/ t I .,l�/. �i/�: / - 'T� - _ tg,i•- BREAKWATERS Reduce The Energy 'THREE-PILE ARDN6EMENT I , of Reduce The EVaV gy to make structure less porous CK055-gKACING tD keep I and Protect Your Beaci�front — -- _ •� re. i •REOPERLY CONSTRUCTED A O 13 TES f',17 !ii BREAKWATER WILL SLOW WATER MOVE- -t�-2�-E'� � C �/ MENT SUSPENDED MATERIALS WILL TIM/3 R2 r LES i ,/LIB y.1.. . I WHERE INCOMING WAVES OR "rant). II i. � � CURRENTS ARE SEVERE IF THERE IS �� SAND IN THE FLOW MATERIAL WILL FILL \ . •� 'N BEHIND THE STRUCTURE � +��, �'$t+. „ ' �� ' Y'y AE�yy/s •PROVIDE ROCK RIP RAP AT THE TOE •`••.f!+ "•y ��,, 1 ' - •,t �.*v ;:-"1,2-,z-,.7-I / •F OF YOUR BREAKWATER AS WELL A$ f•• � - l� -" I SOME METHOD OF ANCHORING IF SOIL -ry w .......,...A.; ,... [.w > i JE- 'A:• CONDITIONS PREVENT DRIVING PILINGS eA,In 1. r / k✓ ,f-,'w �� 7 f•1.yt....0T•fr TO AN ADEQUATE DEPTH �gAG� �� • � ,. 7- 1 Iai_or-ry -4, -..4.-44,4,-00-,,, ;-..-.- -._:.•:,,,,..1. .. ....,_,---_:-. .... . . ,;.-.. _:, , i.,... ..„.., -4-. ,,,,... ;.„..„-,,,,. ...4_,... _,....„....-..-:.. • ,...................u.. , ... ,:., • _ _ 1 `, '� i • - T 5 • I % 1 il I I Osmose Protected Wood Products...Superior IPerformance In The Marine Environment. The waterways and beachfronts of America The high quality, 100% oxide pure Osmose z• r- *-�--: .;_;�„"- are littered with pieces of docks, pilings and preservative is fixed permanently within the ''., .::.4 - :�, I ` other flotsam. This littoral wreckage isn't wood fibers,so it will not leach out reducing Y k , Osmose pressure treated wood. Even with all its '`' the elemental forces working against its effectiveness.This bonding eliminates the fi: 4 �' : • "`i :: g gainst Osmose question of pollution, ecological damage and • `-- "f ''� "b5 •: - `•y Wood Products, the protection we put into g g b ■■�i��elao `` ` ' P hazards to health. ,"- - __eaanite - wood is permanent,serving day after day ►�4 I►+�i.' •i:.1_in .c._n.•. �r year after year I . ii$i-Fl *V1 "*"*''.' Any Marine Construction Worth Building Is `" i -"^'�` .,. I Worth Osmose Wood = �= __ �-___ Products. ,: - ,_--_ The unique conditions of marine construc- :c .. K -AWPA x .'. tion call for products that fulfill very specific -I objectives. Primary requirements are: .... M. _ *�'� ,: ' STANDARDRETENTIONS IONS ,�S Resistance-the ability to withstad l _N.+~deterioration;Integrity the ability to function effectively as a unit of the whole;and Strength- to hold the line against physical and biological Applications Retention' Typical Uses ' J forces- YP 1 Structures built with Osmose Wood Pro- Soil or Fresh Water--,',.^3---,,, ' w: ` : "' " ` pe ' `:-^ �,,�-•�r"�M '-Posts;Landsca a '� •°-� _ ducts function against Contact > ;zw -: p I gainst the forces of nature and `0.40 - _...-:;Timbers,Grape Stakes, _ ' prove,time after time, that there is no '`' (Non-Structural) . - 'Retaining Walls substitute for quality.A graphic representation I - '{-;.-...mph, x -yir-;. gar: y _ + of several types of shoreline protection is il- lustrated Y Soil or Fresh Wate : - ' - _:,.o� below. Take the time to examine x' Contact-=`ice = r oo un.afions .v these structures and decide for yourself the ' 6 ut(aing „,Poles F I! Y = y(StructuraI) ',`:" u , , - . type to suit your particular needs.Then. '' :_ �? ` , •; 3 #s , specify Osmose marine-grade Wood Piles-Soil or Fresh `''_ L Products...you can't buy a better pressure -= '` � ;; 4' treated wood,anywhere. .Water Contact 0.80 f °`� "" ° ,� _ (Structural) m : T =Foundation •iles , . •,- .-. 1 • •'"�'' `"' �o ;Salt Water :.w� f��• - : .. z,. x s, z `�+ 3 u1k a '1 • i� ----, ,� -»- � ontactx � 4. '.1- x- • ., I �, *Pounds per cubic foot. Minimum retentions conform to standards of ✓ , - � _ .: the American Wood Preservers'Association. _: ~, Ywr..g. GROINS IWhere Longshore Currents Are Extreme a W �:>`-s ,-;; y' Le 715 I ',CONSIDER GROUP CONSTRUCTION ` I OF GROINS COMPARTMENTS TRAP 'k'F. �� ' s MATERIALS MOVING IN LONGSHORE ��7777 , ` S _ ` �, ,� CURRENTS - - �, `�,: *SPACE GROINS TWO TO THREE TIMES �S SANG'T'PAP Kn \ ' gip •'_T ,+ Tt)IV0(JE THEIR LENGTH TOO CLOSE:LIMITED /-Afir�.''" "p�••�"/�`� �"►"•'� \\.�, Y ��y J � iTOO AR: Nvl7 Iv--IF11N�Y INEFFECTIVglrir•STRUCTURES SHOULD 8E NO HIGHER �THAN THE NORMAL BEACH ONCE Y > / FILLED SAND TRAPPED IN COMPART- . " `+ ` 1 N4 f I MENTS OVERFLOWS INTO ADJACENT'tthe �� \�� ' � � • -,: :� I l �� nuN V UNITS ��ctF.• er�Okl 1, i •BUILD FAR ENOUGH OUT INTO THE `� . ' . �"" -� J iI •��WATER TO ACCUMULATE SAND BUT ��NN1r LI ``�7 NOT SO FAR AS TO CAUSE CURRENT ; °',�y� ISoi.LVr111'./�V�1�- I _ i I ;I RIPS OR COMPOUND EROSION PftO- ^4Pr I BUMS DOWN-CURRENT FROM YOUR �� K4 �` -: I' i . CONSTRUCTION S • I,J 'iI i •BUILD TO A POINT THAT STORM4 'a? �:•''-" WAVES WILL NOT WASH AROUND THE ��"��"°°��e - L SHORE END OF THE STRUCTURE. ' • * '4- ..11■1111■■■■■••••mminet il ■ I Especially in The Marine Environment, Choosing The Right Wood For The Right Job Is Critical. SALTS vs. OXIDES. There are basically two SPECIFICATIONS . fi, -�. gam_ ; types of CCA wood preservatives:Salts and v, ;--,.--.'5 .; _,,�•-.1.4 r,;,,, %-- ;u,i;..;,..'— Oxides.The Salt formulation is a chemically i All timbers, lumber and piling marketed �==• ; r r� ;,: n r si ;-y;::: ferior CCA preservative because of impuriti under the Osmose name are pressure treated }7:4",,,l'"'--1..--" L.Y °=°}""� ° •a�the ingredient mix.These chemically inferioF' •with 100% oxide-pure Os .,-.4.,.,•,:.,-mose preservative. fil.,,v , r "_•" , ingredients,when used for wood treatment, :t , �. This preservative meets the American Wood- 4. _--- -_ , _ bloom to the surface to produce unacceptabl Preservers Association Standard P 5 and `` --`-'-'''''L"`;'' `•i' - , residues which can corrode metal fasteners an Federal ? f ft, ;A ;•; -- .: .•„:. - ••,,t_.,•3;_..„,... Specification TT-W-550. Osmose 3:f;,-,F.y .. ":7•%,--.T.: __.''-'-- °T•kr •• -leach into the environment. preservative is applied into the wood in a •``4�▪ `- 'z'.:_ .'--• • '# '_- OXIDES vs. OXIDES. Even among oxide ` tis"`'� ~'~~ ='``'`,.'.: 1-1'.' - ,- formulations there can be a significant dif- closed cylinder by a unique vacuum-pressure -- i'T *u.: ;s,;^.; .:4 ;,},-_';':j ,t'., ,' process in accordance with the approved star- ,, .e*''�, `?°.r?,,; _1,1-- - :`-,..,...,?;_i..• Terence in quality.That difference is in the dards and recommended treating practices _ :. "i`,_��--- .„, <,r';;_'` g P Y3 Y` _z— --s- purity to of the oxide preservative ingredients. covering specific wood products as listed in the "' � ��: z= << _, ? .k Unlike low-grade oxide preservatives, Osmose AWPA Standards Manual. "`'`"; is the highest purity 100%oxide CCA-C �""°—,-; available in the wood preserving The retention of Osmose preservative for Pr lumber,timbers and piling used in salt water is 1'11-411 '`'.... industry.industry.While low quality treated wood•specified for the particular use. For additional products face a growing liability,Osmose -. :�- uses,please consult the table for AWPA Stan- �� ' wood products are dean and safe. dard retentions to select the proper retention Wit- �.' E for your particular use. Technical questions? ,...-c. '1 �' e�<� ' Wild, ti. -I �' Y P � t ..�•' ,F �I For all the answers, call our toll-free number: '`d ? --'=i _` �..�.(.�� 1-800-522-WOOD = sue• it _� °�� , AllSglf rI i ._.. ft " ` 'r ' �-,-.? ,.? ..vim = i - - s ---�--- -•»-fix.-T°c�.7 :1 i M w s i i,.,-� �— , gyp-. 4.,..,-•�%y.1M �� fir_ • Ibill,....+ _C •y • a - DOCKS AND PIERS AI Provide Access _ ,� -... To the -Water r +-- •BUILD EITHER A STATIONARY DOCK, ! _ -I- ` ' OR A FLOATING DOCK - ? t,.• i•^� !k III '1 '- ' Ill' III .. III . *EXTEND YOUR ACCESS WALKWAY TO t , 'T IIIIII�e III��, t r l, I '& ' •1 _FLOAT T7 RISE AND FALL WITH -- - �I THE TIDE - - -- - - - 1 r•K .' - •BUILD riAIR FLOATING DOCK - - _--_ - =j nM!Mi�•�•yam, •! 1 AROUND STYROFOAM BILLETS TETHER �?'-4- .__-- ----- - !-...; /`- P •-.� ��•THE FLOAT TO FIXED PILING$. -- '-- � � � �'• t _____ ._,_ —— - `�:.� _fir^ t: '., .:� �:w ti=f�••••••! .01 -.. -- --- - .1i .^`j~` ( '4 �'! rtes`} •14.6%-•.� l -- :-'mil } �•- `h . .- II ( . I , - .*- t IF li ose ------------ ... OA I - ' brand . . ^re I if ., i ., lir 1 11141 ft.... ....,, !fit _41: I It it-AL e t• i . .... -: t , .s ,- .l' I -,i.e.x F.., •%,i.et, Tri-4, -,:' -4,s:::...-..--.-.• ••• •-% .,-,-_ ..-s.-t-,.... I:,4_,riil i„,1,f - .-..c--,....:0-'■%'-' '="fr-4i...."".',, '-'..;. 7i JIL.i.1/4 '...; ••. • - .s. :'"••••.• 1... 0,-;:r.-...'",:-%.... tr f If -1_111Vii-0,--;,' - ' -7,?......,.;:q..e.,„,"':--144.I.!-.._...."•••=;r:.:*•`;1-;•.7-:•-,..-:.-•:.-. TZ.-!tifir- -.. -1-.q.:!'vt* . :--:-..7.1-.1 tir!:',f4,'i :17"!,t p:,'' * •'•#-.0;ft'--7-!n..'";...7..-_,---- g..,.r" - ."‘="4".4'... ;"•-•-'4...."-.7-='•-■ *4 ,Wa a --. 41 !.."-* . *-..;---e•-•:1,--, :-...i•.!.-1 ,J.,:.40••• _•;..,--1-,......A.:-,--V„-,..-7,:-...-,,,,,Lv.7... .:•..1 ...7.,•../,:-•.1....,2,„„,„.--.?•17-,.,,-...e.-Ai-,, I ... -,-,:t1-4. '4"'1-.` .-. :.'!'V1.. A-1-1'1*-,.r....:,.-tr•-%-i..=.„••,1.-,-'. ,.---1'.,,c;--I-- 1,-4- !*.i.-12:f.:-..,24-:'.-z: -.4,..ckgt-:•:::::-.; 'J 1' .Efra i /..4 --.:.- 04.15 I •,::_, .4.• .4 if,...-t....4 Rots,-.i.....I.:1z...;:4-41.-.6.43,ititir-_-_41-.11- ,is sLi.e,Lr.,.,..1- '.1- 1%.,,,,----11"t ' .:-,.- ;••••,i,:'---, ,„„ ;,,a,,, 4.--: itk ,Pei ..._•.• -• •,:.14-t s-4- r. .1 t7" NB,: --P .7,',7S1'.-;.'7 r• - :,:r. '----97-:-2. t• -•-:,r'. -. • • .... e•J:..1 441-01 nyi,,a •-- • •;-.4 '0"/ .*A" -t- •'X.,4 ir...w.o,rel.. ce,„1,4 ...s*.- •Is- .0'i - - ...- -. fAftv,"t;,,i, / I i F'.' .4'7..r ..4?A) t••47 - ' •-';'' 114 -11P---4.. ei-aoll 1 ---• ''''-.<-*;.:-.- .4'- k *•"% --4tr.l.• .. -.9,-SAAP,■- - •414 1' 4 :%. P• -- •-atVt'''., 1.- i''In re. --,1", - ':. '.!•;_-•• ---,„J." ,,;„r....,.....: -..-- ....„:- ..,,,,:,-,-.. I 4,.....,„.3: r. 4-la 1„, .-4,---..,.... --4? ,,,i, t 1,,,,, ,,,, ,...., ...., ,,--.,..-...,:_k-, st,--•-- , ...- I:. v . --,, .w.t.• • --r-,‘41,:,-,_ .■•■■:, -.-- ; ,. _ • /0- • 304tejr.i.• - ,jr • ---.4 . ---,-.. -.,..I-0,-7--9-,,J' 17 t k.,,,•"' i ist.ii&air-- ._.- •--.77:-:*7--:--•:•,- " ' r i .-- ,...., -"" .......■• TI f . - •• 4,,___ - or/ './146.e''..• • . =•.4••:... z••• ,......... --- c• r•tga r r-......,.--,,,. --•,.....r.r,.‘' ... :1•"*":.1 ,.•,are4Prt.o.t 2r;., .-,e,w C_,I• r. -' .... ,.1.1.N. • _,.,,,a. ..'4 s ' :`f "-"•'• ar-- 1 :" - it#,.. . ....-..ffnietV ,.... .„,,K•ri,. ,,,,,,,101,, ok,,,,,„,,,,,, ,4.,_ .,...,,,, t kpa rig f- -yi- --...t ,- Fa.,e_ ■1...1;;;;.•10.,:- - 1,.4-A - -,t. -.. ••:.' • - -.0c.:,---y4,,,„t. • - 7 -s••E•••:c6 lbsidit• - ....,,-- •-r '--"4"f"- ,-4-.;- -,---,•,;.--- • .- . • ........,..,...... - - .: t.,... ..-- •••• :.•-...!..---. ..--.,,,,,..;,,,r • 1/44,..• o. ..-,. .. •...,,.."-„...iir rs ' • . 1,,-,,c-r,,-..., _,-ik.7-.;-",..„-. - `V•Prr... 7., _- ,- - I .- ,i-NI . . .,..e./.•• -":::,,7..7_4 . •.•,....r • ••1.e2t.•;.a. ,'''..:;'• -'-' -...' 7.--.rAal lq. - --. -I....••• , ' . e. .ii. .1''',.. V. •--•1/:1,4`..:,:i.fe:. -.70,51- ...__ .-,......-- ,4,...;*Le, -.-,j.,,,vp,• . :,-.•_-,--,-* -cii A. _ ASP --- . :--4--....A.:t?...-he_-.J•., -....apt...pr..-:,.. 1- , -."MI'-•■•••: -.4",... __ -- .- tann.Zon-• ... 4 lin- Gfia,„ _,a An. • I --‘,..-.., .....' •:41A.,......,...;4M1 ...;" i.m....onne-1.1111111.6 •••• ,... t•.f..tra- _,:,-„,,,_ --...111111 ----:,-zt,'',.:•-- .5.- . . - . •--- • • v • ,ve -jai„.....c.„-.4.1,.. -„,,OS-4-014,1er' _. --P .... : ‘4. : f •fl '. t4 - I 1 ; '-':- ;igr. 4... .... At- . ti 1 , • ".eA * ' •..•- s ' - s 1.•,S..! i ' 44. 'ft?,_,...1"-",t_:-." .,,. -.- 4 g, • _. 1' : •-•'•••t: : ,;. - ,--JL _ .„AN -77 74, mz, ..,,..t, , ,-1, . .., ,- ‘1.... ..11-,., • e f '..•=.4,90''', t : I 1 1 . '..: • . - ,._ '10Slire .. • '- 1 4. - *"..... V" ..........-,-x• .-- . "-i-.., t -1. --.....A- - : 1 •*-••••-- - _ _ ,,,vt.-- .f.,:,-••- .,..1 - . -,-•,. 1...4 - - . .A.--- -, - ' I I i. 1 ' - 4"*"--"...1 ti -. -- V.;P:--' 4: 1111 .s.'. .7: T',...,,e. 1 \ '..-- " ; ' „di': -1‘. •t ; J '‘.. '''........f •4. ,.. .',.- T1'1' -'.. •0! -- F . - -' .r.-.N. `0- ' -•"'"' i - t ' :, i 1 ' 1 4 J A- • i • 1 - ,. _„.,. ., , ,. -110.1,4-46 '1 . -0: •- - - I ' v p; j„- ::,- , -,..."'T".a. e-f-. -.:::- "-- „„,, ' -,. 1 li ...• • le• g . . _.,20iti.,..0 ,......s• , ••••t ' 1 , . -. .. 1 ,, 1 row,..„1. 1.1 • , .I+ .. .•,• •a-a-.,-, . "--- 't . ' '-. s .....' .., •At, . -,. ..,-.--7,- , . \it •:. .....) i2P.J."...t.1:-.^,7.4.. 't ••440,4.li i it.,.- ,4-7,5,-..1.,.....„,,,-,:„„ ,::,,,,,, . , .k... I 4.- . 4 ft, ••-■0 ,e...... ..nog.• -,; , -,. ' -- -:--:. .4:1•Vr I.:-,,`,'V ..,_ - - . . ...,-, ii.,T, /. •....' , ` !,,,f,s,:_.. ..'"4:2,t - - i' .': .-.' cfr,f•.;:•;n:•__,I-'.1. ., _:' .*_T.,_ = •...)1 ," 4,4.'f a ••-t. ' -. . "-_, • ''-$:-.. "...•1 ' .. l' , ,-'`--- .,;."-‘,, - - „!,-„....- .,Io ',..- - ,-.- _,.. ......." : ,..". p ',,,, 111 fr „, 1.,-. - .i• 4. i .:- .L. .,- q,-,,. d- F.. * , . '• '4°.'K.'" sdiopp.,,•..,, 14.Ir*Inter" •''-:" -• gr--'--' - -7• ''''--' , .t::,-._., _r _.-_ ,-. - ....._ - ... _‘..,__„.: _,...,..„. ,•,..,..,...,, ,_ ...,..,_ . ... ..n..,....„....,..: _ . ........... .„ :. ..,..,,, ...„.,,.,!...._...,...i4...... ._ _ _.....v.,tic......v...„.... ...4„,.....,, - _..,...._ ,„„„ r„,;.:. ,..A.„. ' ' a.,• 07 .;"••• ' .4. i 1•2_,....,.•,. 0- 4, .....,......- .....7.--fl,,,, ,32..„,-- , ,. gr. --, ,i•• ' , ..';i.. -„ 7..1441‘.211Z-sj#4.. --- .v. - -N.:, ,-1A-veL4-.;-, ..,,.‘iif-f-t,:rt,-l.t.,- ..4.:..... ,-rw....,1,,,„... -;,t,'.- , ',..,,:!", I,; ,,,, .1 J _ , •.•,---..1,-.2t., ' ' •-`..-r":".',- ;).•''''''' Ns't- .. .e,14.ttr '‘-- :4•'''''--.:•...--... •••••••'.. .%010;''•-•*-."-rl•P;ri. '•"...4',gef-Ce;-,1,;17;Ali iff-----1''." 4., 4...,‘ . : ,-- -`:•e,„ --. , ' 1 _,._-•, s, ,„,k..„4 -,=-,_ * '...,:i.s1.f,^'.'Ift4'etll-'t•-' 4'i ••-:t',-•: tr r•• '-'' '.1.1 .,.. ..., .0•• - • 1 I -..., .' t •2 -..% ''`...4.- 1, -:--- ...w. „..i. ;. ..,,,,,..,... -,•=,- , ,■t•. 44,..., g.. .11..• •••,„..„,,,„. - .f„. _ ,...z....-----....-...._ or...,-; , ,-,...%-y.. -yaf.74.,-jr...-..-L2•4-4 r,-*-;-,, ' t.,-, •-4-'•- , ;•-• , -- --.. ,..1 ,---L.-, . **r Sri r`; t 17C• .10116." 1 - - ",''"A•*1..' ;...- . \''''''' - tj'ift:- ' ',"il, , 'A•titi iC,,, ' • , ......a. t ,.... ... .....- ' ""4. 411.7_,:;,:, ..t,,.•, ,r,,,e■"1 , - .f .).• ' 4 r,....-•• .. •..„, , •,,,• ,..1 ' ••/•• A-- ' . • rgt... '- ' "''... ':Lb .4- •'''.. ..,,• .'. 4■;'I- I _ . --- .. .-....-.:. -.,,t,,,,-. - . . -.. eir - .4..,..t.-0 4,•••• ** ., 4r,-N - -, .-- .,,,..I. ' 't ' I.. '',3,'I 1 '• ' ts'4: • •••• WA.. ' ''•••;,•r•,• - 'if ii ''....„,....404,.., -.•-• ..'''' ' '' ..,1 ' T - . .00■ „,... . ..„..._ :iii.•.. .. .:. _ _ .7 , • • _, I _I.. .. . . . . ,,.... . ...., ... „. _ . _...... ..... • .. .. . _. • .._ _ . ., .0, ..v... .. _ . . ...... , ... s • .. ....... . _ • ,..s.1 _ _\• -- - • _.• • -- ..- • - _- ______ -_ -___ '7- •-•••••••••••• -...... 1 - ••• • • , • . •-••• N••)'•••••4..vt„,-;-..1....- ..v..:- -•.,. ',.. . I Its All Weather Capability Is A Major .:. '7- ' --:'-- ,. .•, - ...z.- „ h. .. .......,.., Advance In The Use Of Wood I .- For Home Foundations /. ...2 . .'r .• ..Z.'‘..*■ ••• • .7■1_.''-, •••••4-_. . ,,,..: - ••-••,••••.•-•TIZG•V>•e•i'./647,ikl4:44Zge''' ••• ' .4. ,...,• I t•-•A•rffj.r.41••••••••),,a.....1...., ,g_i&e...•-••••;,•V •-'••••.,-.1:•-•:`•--4;•. ..X1-,..1,:artA*7**','"V.4-041eit."•1 *P.; 4.„ •••,,,,,, -WAWA4tt.ltriitlitO '':'--*'''. .. '' 411-iti;;;A1201r4.,i‘,.06W;ib;: 11-•A%:-di.ialig.0;ttafakiltini .'-'' X.4--7 '...r-:..,....7 '' •••‘-';' ..- ; '". '' '' "' .7-'• - "--•.= '-*"- :---. 11--C:hga. .:;,ici-1) . Srnoseof........ 1 • Wood products I i R UCTIO • - ,., .: ,. THE FULL FOUNDATION WALL • THE PLEN-WOOD SYSTEM ` '` 4 T . THE CRAWL SPACE • THE WOOD SLAB-ON-GRADE " 7- . -- = 1i� ., r The wood foundation systems are.essentially.below- weaknesses of unprotected wood.With this kind of I 1 fi . 1i I sr }' grade walls,crawl spaces,underfloor plenums and the protection,the extreme conditions presented by deep �, 1 ~. r pressure treated wood slab..all constructed of ground contact will not affect the integrity of construe- Osmose�Wood Products.These are proven con- [ions built with Osmose Wood Products. <• struction systems,and a cost-saving alternative for Simplicity,durability and cost efficiency.These at- � .�J + builder and buyer. tributes of the wood foundation contribute to its grow- ,,- ` F. The concept of the wood foundation is not a new ing recognition as a highly adaptable and flexible method �? �_ { _' idea.However;the application of Osmose wood of construction.In residential,light commercial and , t ` .L a A , preservation technology has made the theory of viable non-building construction,Osmose Wood Products are r ti, " "' wood foundations into a workable reality. the materials of choice for wood foundations. ' `\ : .' �� There is also a growing awareness of the advantages Today,well over 30,000 homeowners are enjoying x 4 x� _�' of Osmose Wood Products.Because of these advan- the additional living space,warmth and economy of _ _ ' G`�-', }` tages,utilization of wood components are becoming wood foundation systems. y .yy 3''' silt_ *sx 414,..-..---�; �i,i. ',: `.-e' more widespread in these substructures once believed — - "' " ? to be suitable only for brick or concrete. -*-, x - - r .r_.•=•'.. --- 1 For the wood foundation to be accepted as a major - - *''' d #'•tom ;4 ja 1.1' (i t I ! ;j°; 1 'f building component•the mistaken notion that wood has - '•`F .?=� j�? ` -' t4Ui�iiil ter � iN lil . 1 r-- ,_ v f ' 1•to rot,decay or be destroyed by termites had to be ti •= s i ri �'�corrected.The Osmose pressure treatment process, f 1 ."0,,� { { #r j,ti +1 }by building in a high level of resistance,displaces the + ; �_yf • �- - `w'- 1 At r r k�_ zt �3` < k .' '.t ,A.,,t.i„ t P_ ..,,: . i. ,`^rte r¥ '• _„...., • , �.o' :i'• s. -":.....:,iii.,...Yc ,.... .....„,......7....._.,....Vi i, ., '- • ; `r, i 1• _ 'Y': b a T _ 4 , .' i - 6 x y-.,ry..- 'ra a {s. _ t i -t'� -n -� - .-- -7; > 7 1 4 .If t!a - t Y f• �Y`r r+- 7 - 1-• M.14< t .0.7.1 vat 1' I 5:•L Y •-----:,,E f ^e'''•34 154 it Q S- t r 3 ,•t< - _ , .tsa. f 1 7 E- .1 q f l� itti y'+r 411$6'11:,:d ' i. u \::: _ *' _ �.1T ' c:.r 9P t t { 't+c yam. (y�-•1 • - Lt I t o 10, , x. - M/r • .- �• f X11 it.:';.'... 1 :464r.•- ;: • . :. _-1.., y„ ;'vi='^- -'r +r:-� : ,:. -; ;`.{'i:,`:,. =:.y:'mot•\ - ; 1 _ "".., j-. -.. •w..15\�:A.- .+�'S_.__ _.`y..._ - ``� -sue`' iy. ■ Full Foundation Wall Crawl Space The full foundation wall,footing plate and bottom .a "" plate should be constructed with Osmose pressure \I. The crawl space should be constructed with o: treated FDN marked lumber and plywood to head off �� pressure treated FDN marked lumber and plywood. future problems.The full foundation wall can be — — 1 „-... The spacing of the framing members and size of constructed on-site or prefabricated. ' footing plates will vary for one or two-story ho o.,„; /,74 -' The crawl space can be built on a level or sloping with equal ease. i �! 4 r»..,....,, • . . ■1c I= tea- .--..n ...._. • .- t ... ev-, it is r 111) FouNDATI( FOUNDAT ( NS I .2, .4>v�t , 1E .y�..s4 1 a, rr�; '`---';-�'-1 IV'� c }f- 1 . ji•°-, ' - %4;. 1.tv Y. - t *1 _ if u°ia-f? r S,-'t`"k"_ ':'s 'it.- 1--r. s A j' - 1• !. t. ,.s-`t;- .- ''> rPv..., r"ilt'_4' t /. 't �s y t-4 e4 ^?'teb L4\jk .!� `'F 1 --4041 7 r:.• :,1r t-....7-4- :;. ...lb'-1= I81 5� • r a...4. �'i T.-'' -s' nr,.. ,,,..-1........___,.. • I -4'!'714,,P4....t a'a •.r° d&a ;j i ,-:•5:::';_' .,>Ei4, .Y441.147.14.•‘-.-.•1 _.4 _ ..f 11f°4'i-!✓ `.•.•; •_aa .-4 _ a 1i ; %.) 13_ y d` ' '.i-'F s: y? e'tyi!le-1'.'i' Ea -r.''r .1 !- .jI ,•,-1,t�,{-- .},%,. ,„,c. � Ti_' Mr pN(�t A' .. .,%.%!!!!:7 'S ax:r'nf. » s7. .i f�DIS I?. I •a. .y f'.� - /� .l!!l;lA 1. •C� ♦1 �n' ,x.! 'In.. z.-?<�t. a +- 1 r.t. 1 _ :i. -i F."'F� r i ..- t-"} l - y pr f., 4-... ,,.,.• ,{,. `-1kt i•i s 't.j�tlytI} 1 .'• i..��..yn� - - •! +! a-s } ' 1 _'i C �t'il/ 1!_-;. 3! 1r- >i- �Yi. f f - ►su !c:.; IT. ,-'a`i ?, . wt '-� t .".r. /� vc, 1 . I ¢ y1 1a. s.. Ik .j i i ns f f N■i ,I t i-`' . ..-:f. C:--e .a. -�.� t. Sv=a S.' I 1 } , y''H�• � ,' r r :4 `F i ,.T.-'rte` `z"� � +-� � -• " '• a-ter .� r `�....•I.tP!. � ',r K fir' a v y _r, .r' ",.>+ _,»- ,.. �r'�...E �. °-ate,. s. '. r;. - - ,r• rr 1�h t r't Y"' ns�'.- • 1/ k 1 - _3 s s.1' te" `, t.�,,� a ,, _:�i .`-. ---,: *�.-•1 �'. "�" ��><°"`*$- - .Y ~ � "� x ; `' ." -_fit'' eU ! ': -'4:-' r I..f - �° .. 1 1 i•1 _ � ; 1 J i . - -'fi 7, � `_.r�k'r, qty s ."- ‘- ,y. f��)�� 'twee" +v l� d GF!' .,``s04 � ._ a ``±s‘.=.--. x,." 3 ' - 4.;-�' p �_1, 1 •4. -,111-..,".� ° Ir�,-4 T ., ./. }MX' ,. ter; � a `Il• D v, ''i*,' `'J. s4�r.ai '4 P~sue y xr"` , _S t 7 "7 •j 3- -- -` F //�c� ' . }'� +mss"- - .,. �z P 1 • . m r j - .n a I a - 7:. 5r.aa 1' '•' 1 Fiiicr0 ss'''1� _ - � l a t . ti'3 It•4t. 3d ,,,�,,,��¢ v 1 , . t:i:. 74:1:::,u"..:_ki,::::1,._....01 st i ) '. ~ - �� ? r f�, y i N. r- f'..- slfV <- +L'c _ a - "...-i7140,--.,.:. _ try» +:45•`44-"1 a, / .t._ ' iD -1 in, it 5 'it"' .1 v may... `�fi�� r• } Z L ri'A , N, s ,~�` • _: ` ",tr ' *s } tea,,_ i} r '- _ ,,1 1 T aa0).. +IC ; fv,'. Z.'r YXV' ' .\ ' 3 ''�Gy, t >• P 7 S ate, 'wa ' . 4t.�:i,. .44 r 1 ?- S - sr° ff { 1`--� s >% sFS. -5:.. i'e. '� Sewl. , `�Mr\ .M'R`.5,} _ I. * ` 'h" _ . i '' *fie i , :' �-�.. �CyI/d� I t ' era...-+* - _ .,^"<_ .'-+ ri- .rt.-ci '= 1,..y., •,.‘i;.-„,:•,;.-,.....� . -• t j `''' "S{" r. __ �1 3' ` :cr :� '�R '�`�yati'Fi:^f4! _, s r t ` : X 'N 4 wi: xa yf ;_. - t.:'a-"} [_ p y +F - �'. , � �srav IV. *,' ,. a . _r,,.� '.V .;' i i. ?Y T d„L...zgit Plen-Wood System I -- -� --':e Plen-Wood system should be constructed with ». 1 RIiY`I�I'' O;rnose pressure treated FDN marked lumber and -1 MN plywood.The plen-wood system is essentially an Y I oe».,aerr. under-floor air distribution system. The total crawl ..,,».� J `.1 space is utilized as a plenum to circulate warm or cool + ��' air to floor vents in each room.Expensive ducting _^1 — --r^- ^»-r is eliminated. 1 - °if I —_ .,per:1 #. —.Mr.O.w.rmRM-• `�9tl j. r. _ .i ..ram.Mfwbv V•. 1,...4. -y r-��ar .... 4 .a. . i . .- ' .e-= i..„ . ..., 11- , . 7 . . -'''':-. _, .,_ _ .., .. .. I .As4. 7_:''.,::.is,it4-z. .. 1 WOOD FOUNDATIONS...CLEAR-CUT ADVANTAGES 1 , 1 44.:. .,. :t.>at;:.-t.::-P'-;. - - .6_.i. ' FOR BUILDER AND BUYER ::s.., •.%.v.,.../. ,, ,-- - - -.... There.s no question that wood foundations are •EASY TO CONSTRUCT-Wood foundation systems ... - 4.-a 1.1■;,--1 ti •, ..4?....... r 4 ■ .„4. r• :. superior systems;engineered and tested under actual are easy to build.simple to install and simple to main- "•••.,..,54:4"..., - f .1....., . ,- ,- r-"--- service conditions.Builders like the systems because rain.You don't have to be an engineer to comprehend .. .43.„...,. ,N, ..,./a........., . •--.:-.. ..:.:— ,,.t._ -1...;,..4,;- they offer time and cost saving advantages over con- the value of a wood foundation system.It's wood,easy .q..i--rP,r,41T., •-..r-,' - • k-tx,.:4-s. crete and masonry Homeowners like the systems 4 4#-,W..14z,-;:•;:t.,zr. , ••.-.. to work with and even easier for the home owner/do- ‘t ....;...; .........,-...Z.vt..z.,.._ ,T,i4.-, because of comfort,livability,energy savings and it-yourselfer to finish.Additions,remodeling,plumbing s-. .%-`415. . ' - -.7`.-„,;-I ..'., ;.,,,,.,... ease of maintenance. and electrical work are simplified.And,any one -:.......-..-.411 '..4.-6- . I. .:-.. ./' ..' ,_'..-. .... •COST EFFECTIVE-No special labor requirements, of the wood foundation systems can be constructed 44' -. ••4 - , : ''..E -.3.-:'-...T.minimINMNIIIINNINIENINW - ' ' fewer man hours and materials translates into substantial on-site or prefabricated. .- --ifir'':"`-:.4--7.k../2A - -. ,-I • savings.Costs for a full basement wall are almost always .. - ,t•-: -' considerably less than a comparable masonry founda- IIKIMIIA.-'ii., -..'-.1„.7.'4 ‘.14`;11;4.,_4ri4L4.-- ,..,-„-.4,-;1-7.?;;4 • tion.A normal wood foundation can be handled by a -:' .4-0 - -t.-"N 1 ao at' tat'ver- ---- 0.-4-- .,.:, .!Ak. 4v.:-..!)...-„,r, . . small crew of carpenters.often in less than a day. 1 • , .,5,.. Shorter construction times mean lower expense and a i-••-..s,:14:er i:t--.,1;\\.,,„...„--.sor.z• .., .... ' .-.'.._ _,,,.,-C„4's•:'''',,•-:'...r1;liffallillitallialiglilllialgral• -- .._ . 1 . better deal for builder and buyer 14 Pr. 1.1 e.A.--. - -----`NY4T-I'' • ... ..--„......n.,- , , , ,\,. i.:8 ■ 7 - ,,....., k,,,, . . 7 , 4_ 1 --, •ENERGY-Energy conscious builders and buyers will appreciate the efficiency of wood foundations,as well as other systems in the wood foundation group.The e sr- r%1,.t . 7..;,,,,,. ,,1:i.-_,x,:-::t • -:„./.-:-.1-.."-.. -.• - - - 4•44-`1+•; 47 i ..1-0. -.., - n.....,t„9,. __,,,,5,, _..„,_...„„:.., ,,__,,...,.. .„...--. ..„,. ...._. _, 1,, ‘,.-.4,,,V,y,it:-:=:.:--- -1,, ft,Zt::!-ee ,-,.';')L' - - - - . ---.1i.:;:f '''kralliellIMIMPIPIENIIIIIII full-basement wall,properly insulated.will lose only '7;4', '.1:'' , i-------- -- .- ,....".e,.. ,.,.,r.....,. .,....„,.„.,,,_,,„,,,_:,.:.,_,„..,....,,.:,.,..s.,...„.:.,_::,,s......„._ .- leika' ,? 4,,4-!. •m.-F-. ...,..._.4- .-t - about one-fourth as much heat as an eight inch poured .."? -: -„. - \ a . . - -, -.....4 .. ,--,;',. ..r• .. - .r- i concrete wall.The point here is,you can't go wrong ,-,•-■-r*,-%•-•-- ','":,,,,...._•:;+ ..,, 01t.44 " - , - - ".•-,":1.'".1■• • -liAt` ...,., - , 7- ''''''' - -• ' ,_,,,,4`4. -P.:•7%tq'S''''-,,4a-5,r•''''-.*:_ ' ' '-- "---- .:•-r '. - with a wood foundation.Energy efficient.clean,warm Trt.73...., •-,:. I*.\iosf-Y-:.,---- , -0:,::•:,,t...--...-„•;- .. '‘.:. :-,- - and dry;wood foundation systems will give you more aik.!.......r.r... . z., i-\...a_.- -...-- Vr•--.,,v,i;...;.--- - ,...-,m... .. --,-- ..i- -..-r--..,....,--4 ,40.i.t.,0,.. ; - '...' .. ..,--, . 7-- . , .. ..-7- - -- -''' • .' .&6;.,0r.e..4t.. -&-i,11.- -,.. 6......_-.- :- it space,return a greater savings for every energy dollar - f.0/0••'_11 and make your basement much more livable. .--#0,,-2.-tut.., .-,4 „._... _.. . „ ._.. _4' . ,,,.7,i-tc,* .-..„:4-,..,. ..h_,,,.,. 5-5,741Pwrit, -.--„k- '-'-'..-'--.14;7k, )tf' ' ii. - ig . ,54,iLi111. _..1„-.4;_--,.4. ,,,,.....,.;3,.....,,,4•Z r -..4.. - .- li; ,, --... — . __ : - ..' --ik--,i ....,0-. - ' *!`";-,, •':'i*- ,....4............;;.......4..., ''-':'•-fi,"1e0-ii- - ' -4.-r..,..-„ -- • ._ ,....,*--,.1/41. ,:,....F.... ,a • ..t ,r'ila.,.4 ,.,----.' .----;---:-3'^:-.L '''. •-:'-.' t.87- - -+_ -''''-'..41 ,..4.1t..!', .'- ", ! 0 11, -... A . •-.-., ...-.--,-4 -, ".00....-4 f•,- —.. -...i.-i.s.- -...i.:-i.i.97-„..„ts ,..::.,---21,-- :1.:.,t,17.-x,- „.... ::..-„,„ .._4.4..,...,-..;_t„a., • ...:dri, ,-,.... -- k.•-7•":4■;:,-,Ve-•1.4 1 i-fF.-4,. .,:,t -,,,Ave- . - 4-,a, -/ , •'-',, 7. . ..-. ._•It....::4-,t.,,,':;;,..,.*, :;-----'.4,-i...-:..' .4-'-;--,. r-...... ...-l•f;-=t.,-_•;:k-ji'l••:,,..)74,4_ ,-:"ra.1, _36_ ,rs.s.. ''' . '-',... 4%1 '-..;'7:"."''' '',it•-=',i,'z,,:itrx„,..,.,tipp..-115..-;4tA:,, e __..„....A.,._, -,,,...11 di-:--,..'-1,,,,,;.., ••,i - •.,...e.., ,..4-..■ - i C''' ' . •-..ln.''''''.. .'.-.' '--LI 72;.: 119-4., -1:til---zrtiv4:4- 1.-3,-:-:7-tw- .-,r,-;"3*--',.-,---:441 _. .-- — K. • till ....5.- -_---- ii .." IL2,31 k'1'."1-.4,';`t-44:,,,"7,,Cr'.A--=-:z..... -.,i ,,,,Is -. .! , 1 ' - • •■•■■,...ter , ,.., i iripki",....;,.: , - - I ... ‘.4 .., . . , ..„±„.„....... _. _ ,.. .,...t..a. _,-,,_____,,„,-..-...t..4,7.,.....gtlis,-.,4,....81,-. it...... ._.........-...;,,,I. . • , - ..1:!,7;,... :-;:--7...;•'_•- ---14,-,, :: ' •I t j-- -----7• '',, ''',...'' r - --,-,:.." : .nr,--_,,,,,,A,_,..4..,:..4,.-..,_41,,,,,: 1.,--'.7--;',--....","'..,,,„ ;''''.''' ti:10,,X;r4411.''W'rZ1=-=''.zlEi.1.±17'' .C.'!"4;.■.:' i A-:=-''' ' ' •'7.'4.. ,"•`—' . ' rAii-e-- - '''--:- . .. '---.. /..__._..1 ----_.—.^r"--ii:—..z__--.7.1A,___:_:'... . k--.... ' 277--,,,as ‘.,;.....,... _ •i'..,::.,t._-,::-''''I. ---, ,-,-rs.„..,,,,l-..,. - -.- ...„ , .- „.-."."--•, ,:-..,_: . -....-..... ,, ..,.,,,,,,,,,.... ..,-,_.., ,.. .... "'-'''. tA ' , '...-- ist...t,` --. ..... -.1!".-....;:':4. :.......i 1...--. -4?,....' -.; - 1 11 '''-is, , . 1.., fii..-.:.....,:-.„11..1., .,.....„-fi.,..,:-.-....y.,.-., :!....4.4..,,,,4 -1.- •:rk:-..- :.4..:....7.. ...„I': -:,-,...:-_..... ., A,i._-.".,,,,, . •!-.-..4:4 - .T.',,....-- :A....,4„.,..,-- ..4. ...-• - ..ag 1- 4 -c----Aff,. --....•..,--: . . - 5ir •- - k. ',. .41i .2.34..,-.. ,, :...-;..,t-•:-:- --' ;,:il!:t: ' • . .i...,,,,,`,---- .:,14-!..:•. ,..'------__* -- •:::,e i /-116' - i----, '''--: ...s.., •._ _.v.-7.-"r-"-.- :-.. 10-- '-----. -.0 ,.•,...... c . .....-,T,. ..,:4.,- . .. ,7--, i.- -;.--,.-- ---,.-- ...- ,i'-• ; i,..4 • . I- -.- "4: I.a --- - ---. ----- . -:.4‘ • ----'..•el -i"- '''" '""ips•• ..'!",'°- "' .4, i '' - -2 • ----i',..- - - - ' ' i '-i'• ', "if r.7.i.:- :1 :if')... ,.. ' .. ....' 10,.•"'-':.';' -1.-k'...• 4-'..--- - ' • ...4 N.•• • .,•-•. - - ti.t." L -.1... ..=v.,-.-_. . M ' Iik:z.4.! tivitea-v-, ---e.•.-, .e ..---**- . . - -- -''.t'-.q.,`' .."' -''''f'..f--'!"-V---:,,-.,,' p, . . ,iic •. ' '.,. 1- ' '•- '''' • . •'-'•• .2"11Per's. - • , - .4>"....... A - . ,.. ;on- .- .1'.11 4- ,:. :I,: iws-i-,.•.*-.-, 17-„• '' • •--1 .. -,'---••--,, -. .i:... _ii'lt...-7,4,?-...-^P-.:1-•-4-'•'11i.;e:/.; ";•--72;.:`-',..4.-'• -----.-!--- '1'.i .'• —---=..z.‘'-'-;:."61:t4;.."----"kulli k., .1, .•::,... ,-4.-;;;4.4.1.7!a2.V.1,-it.VV-1.4,,,•,',14•.:,:•,;,,747,41:-,7.,;,;,:fi'7!),.•-, -,..:''•-.4,..,„-V'--,N, ,.:. ;4,,....____ 1 . 1 •:........,-- .._:-": Li ,..0.1,C ---•. ,••:::•,'...,..771,..;‹,''• ;•■••.•''As.4,-,f:„:-:,...-4-.,..:--,4f..--..:17,-‘, ,-4--'N,' • .. "k • '- • ' . .- •-• -:- —II - -;-'tir.•`4'.' ‘.. Ev".,.‘. . - • ---•-••---..,-:.-..:"....11,-..i.,',.4.....4.4-'';''.'-'....-1; '2..••, •; _ ,.,,, ._. .: .., ... •...' •, .. , . -4.1$0•?r, -- e ' v .■ lei',.,;:k.•:.'''?•°410-4 L..':t•••I'''.',.."1”.•3....7 *''''''''''',".er■:..c.•;e•:4 ,N,4-1,.. .„ '"WWIlliak- ‘, '"....,....,,,,. ' ,.. . . - •• - 71=11.1........111■11MMIEMEgmmiv • Wood Slab-On-Grade Gra.or v-watt Ito.fil I The wood slab-on-grade should be constructed of • •. . ,.: .;;.g. -;),-,f....... i! 0d,,‘,.,.ii,-;p.....,..5.',,I".::.....:':';•-.-. '.:....• •.•- -:-•. ,. Osmose pressure treated FDN marked lumber and -- ,r o i.c..-- --°.-- 1.....--!.--.',..I '.--,, i•••• -:.-- °••".•...•-,-•°•• . `i. ... plywood.The permanent wood slab-on-grade is simple ::::"?7:. . .. „44,....4.1 ,..4,---4:= .:.1:i to construct and even simpler to install.Properly con- . •tia•-,tii,-/-----=11.4 -...: •••;..-47ri:2. •:!..--*4 •.. .-_, .. ....-....,.•,I, structed,it is warm.dry and a money saving alternative ...' , _ • s... -'''-z.•• , '.:.•.-' -ir.g.--...1 . Aia.;.1=inv•r.".:-..:-,....•,•■ , • _ to a poured concrete slab. r-T-rt1;117-Irv.--~'Iw,.,..°:"-' t.•.1.• - * . 1 !IA ' '4.4....,.:,!.-,i I •='.,. ..`'... 7.-..Z.A.V..4: 1N i'' -- ..... ,•• ._ ._. ' . 1... ..,. . - ,.... ,. .- . .*:4-74 45-t-74,-;..r' . .'...u,... jt-. ...:..:,....;,..%.1., _ ., ' *4-4- `A ' 4, :e. r t' - .. ..:;„ :: . . -:.;..44#..r. .;c.i.,;3 Pi2.41.' '-:47.. ...-i.,-;•4-...,..-.7;•J.:.• II ..----:-:,•; .:;,-..--3,... _., , .-- , ..._-:P.,....1:7.,;,.. ,...,I_ - . . -,...:,....u=,;..t.,.41 - '' - '-' .7.-i.kn •i•:. --..,_.; , ..,;•S- - ••.:vi.(-,.;.;;-4.21...N.. :,i, '.'it.,..i'..*. ':-.•:•,z"„:4,1c.. -I e•::N.1 .. ;. ••0 c .300 141101.14.01 _ f .. . . . , ',.:' •. I er rt \ -• 1 ; t•.%:, r S J t ; ose® ii III TM brand I iv 1 _ i _. gr. Is -; Itt, kt_. r 1,.. -_ -..1, itc e L' ,;_ ilk : Fr F. z . .----. , , 1 t 1 i.. I %-'2.-.' .,-.;,-.•, ..t- ;-- --- X. --, 1- k,.. 40- '•• #---.- .. 0 »;,-, )76‘-- •• _ 77-'''' t:"" '7:4•17,4W-Z7W-rNt's,r,.^.,,,,,F;•-•;1":'•,, v.•_•-!,--::•1•.4•,--_,, _-, . . . .•.,,.;••1.,-'-'k_- '''.••••!••••""--C't'.7--:;`",,•'...-'''.'- '•- - - I -7,,..,',4-,:i..--;'..",:‘'''''.a...‘•....L.:•''-',",••' - -••- •••: - '4.'.....i.;•••"•• -.`7,-... - ',,,,'r.:••:'•,.1.-- ', "..,_-•••••C-''—',','''' . . - •,,.. ! -..,-..i „•. ' , ","4,:-.V.:■:«--•-•-r,4=---,,F'••-'1'‘.0..''•.....,;,„ '•;„1..,...,.. • „ • ... 1 . . - . • - . __. - , •-••4.1;,:,.-+,.,;.' ';5%,',.•_. . ...'''' • , . ■ - • I . • -, ' . ,-,1400*---- --,-1;.:y s---•-•-:-,: - -,.-,. . g‘ - , 2• • .„ .• - - - . • _ . - , - "--_-- • , - . ,..- . - - I . 11':".2:-z_-'' ''''.Vr-z..., "‘;',`.:"',"-:;-:_,--;-, ::-:,, . . ' 1,. ,..,,..,:o 04 i '": ''-' ' .::,., '- 'r.: ithriir'-...,:r•ii_:,.... ''',77:_:,.,.: ::bev„.: _ ,17';::::::!,!:!:.1::;i1,-,:".1;.=.:: ::-.;:,filF:..i:-,..!,::.:-.;.,:,,,,,.;-:::Tek ; ' ---;,•••••0": "i I I • ,...z.-avf.-„. -..t..f%•.- ,.g---"..,,.._.._-• _ '. i.;•,..'4,-.:,..:, -1-- =.1:-:-• --W-!--. "------_______-_, --1 : ----,-'--.. I- - .: _ 1.- --'''-''.7i:-,...I„--z...:'::::2.,E.:;;;:' ir::::V-,;i`..-,"-,,--:::•,<:1!._.- „r-_,._,--.,:4• ..,,..., _ ,....,..... "-f :z•-i"--;-',..' "'•- i a•-, II tl-.. - ...................,.......-- ..• -- .,„---..,...?..f.-->-•• ---.---.-;,!ii.'s..::: ,-,-.• -.._.,-.', . '- "..:-;..-------z--:;,"-•I t.6.-..t.,,,,VIs 11 • •,-.1_,.. .• I li - -:-- - _ --- .. - _ . ..,,,--' .- . -7.4 ,. .1.-f:,•;.,z,, ,,,tZ41:1,,,,,,__:,:z.,,,,--,.. -4-la ;,.. .-ii--;•7.- 0... I ''''',..r-__-.,.4%,-,..4. - - : _ . . ' . - -• '..-, ” - _.----_-;_s--.J' ,S, ,. , . 'II ;..-- :.-....."4'..41■• xt...iiZ--,-.__, ...-_,. - - l.:.. ,-. .„.;;,.1... ,.e.,,i....;It 4.._ 1, fr. ., tr._ ,...--t.,...• '...,.- f:'...,r,"'-''''.'...'.''--,It. -- f7 r -4--, J. ;. :-., .„..,. _- ,..--r.,,-4-4 • .... !_. ., __,. ! _ ........ - -, . ,, r _ -'7- t.r ,....4 - _•_. .• = :._ 2 „- -...3....,:-...., _..,-...-,•,:0,.'.4 .... • -,•.„,_. .........,..- -: f......1, . - ,--. •[7...,.....r .3„......,1 ,..:...-..-. ,.......,-:,......._ -.-.:-....... _,..-.-..„ ,.....-,-.,-.....,,,,,„..---.- --- I ..,.,...`5"-'-''''-`14.:' '''''AlL3'- 1 „.._ _ , :„. . . a...._.,,,, . .- i.„..::,.,.-7:;--,-.:„-rt, .., ---- --. - --.... 'f-..---.- , ' _ .---- ,., t.,..i, . ,.... ,. sc , ,.;:. .: .- „.-.... - „.,.... "--,.._,..„.-• ,,,,,_ , ,I , .,.., .... .-- - ■,., .7 ,_ 4.t.P. f. • Mr *-4 - ."" '"Z. ....• ': '...."•--- • -- - - ■ a Ts"0!.. Z.-'r:t.i.. (''''.V.--."'.. `",:,' - - •-,--.--.....Z'r ` . r..,4"..- " 1,-- 's-'.-...,', -,-7-77.- - tr-7--- -r..,...n,--31.- ",,,,;•..7,..,;rn•,./0111111 -4.111, ..M.,......,„ ,t i''... "".a...ky.T11,:ri_*r.',..•,.... ,..........._ ., t ••....A...11ft,-..les."4,.., S.,,, '•.-...1''. ,..:•.:-••■•.'W.,41 '-'d 2- "•,-- ,- : - 5 ,..".,'"-. '4.17,..-4- '11-A.041._094.*g•g••701-- :,.. --..._,--------,..._!-t,- --- -•;.--• • I ......,•-,.---_,...,:-..,,,-,.. _ ••,,,,,,•••,-... _ NI*-......„......„..._. --4#-4.--,..4..„-4,,---+-..,„_,... .....ii.B,.10,1Vre.--....-rx,- "47,03.-.111v,11.4-ick*,•-4 .-zza.,:•••:----- -' • - 'WI ------4,1,--- nr-'•-----,'4Pq ---.. \.),•-•'•""-'r-L. •-- • - ''''',... ..t1: alz--,.....-.-t-••••_.,- ..• -= .,. . A , +4-, . . 74,,,arr. • - ...' 1 • ' ."" j ‘, fiy, ...-•,..^.1?.....1,-.-. ,.... Ver-,:".,..rie.;; ;;I:itirrmill t. ''''''' IP' •''''• ',l'ig' 1 1'''`■. • ' i, A• %- • • -. 42"•-••• , ,,....7---, ..`,.. ',- ' *" " ' '''' '''''''';''''';‘;ir`',4-:".• t'•'''' IT- . la --.,",,......--- ,...' .,„`", s•v41..t.'2' .. -''...1,' *}1.2.4., ... * '''."•- ?..... '- • ,,,E, 'Alf,,- ' ., '''' '.`f. ''- . 2 %,-,,1:-'1A,4 %Ix t'-,,it:*`.. '2.--\;:::,'-. ta..:,;:,:'° r-,,.,...-:.:. „..„,.....„,;,,,,-,.:..-...---„.7.1.,, _,. -_ ..... t. gi, • . ••- .• - ...I • 4 -•,,:'.1"--1.:* V %..:41,,..-.00"1744:51,.•ER'. • -1,-- . .- -...-..,..-1 i ::. ----,,t--,_.------....,.....--.-.....-_-_--., .---....oii.--- i--' ,._-_.:ye.,,::,....'..,•:C...., :re-.Arran'g=r1'1.:-17 .... '. . • ' - - *.--- '"..7.:-.f...,,. ,e7::',P:4;giit*„. ..44A.:4+`7:7;.:11,-0.,b;'-pt,j. N''....:1;*el,itt"--'1-t,e;f 7-7.--.,h'!ter"Wr•• "1' ' . ' -- - I • •t'.-t.10:?";`liet.•&*N.1 4,,.: ' .4i4.,, . ' ..,_ --"""57: 7'..-iti.-!-. _,.--.--.--4.?!... I . ... ., _-__: . *,-_- : --... _.-I ..." r-t.t. '' „.,:,,:t",,r-...14-"V.'S',• 'li••' .N',' '::•''P'- 0444pit.....:1'''''s• ":',.... ....‘44•■:'•m ' -': . ,Z, :tt .s..,'''' '•-•"-•••-•.' - -•' -;311i1;."'V '''''''''' 1,-4°E'4'• . • -•''' ''ZV'--,r4 ''kt•' •-•, 100'.- '.' ' ..'.1,:=3g,„'%". ' -7-4. ..*.t; ..:•''.- . - ...,„. , --,737 4.• ..,,,,„.,„T.?. • 0,,,,,-,.. . er- .....,..x. . "'" - . '&'-',11•*'-.-ra.g.,...1..•V- ' ..: ,,,04,'" A': • .',„ •• •.1••-•.i-r‘s.,`":. '''k • . Ait ,, . '-',V. •....4.04...' ""tr._.....ek.. ....,Y...— 'e , 74. ,.6. ...4. .,.;,..,,„&a.14 ,r...., ., , r -, ,e, ,,,,,,..,at. 4. „••'''` 1.t. J. '"_.= 4411,14„. I ---' +' .At‘F r .3.9,,,, 7,- ... ,... .644,,„....., , ..-N..,...-1.1, ,*0......., • :I. „ .......-...ie.-,,,..4.. _. 4 ,,_ 'M-14- 41 ,' '''-,r r, ,.,a0.* ..,4 - ' A______.-,,,,,,'.--;"-_--777 ,„,-,-,,,,::.„.. .i„,-,.„....5;14 .rdsei-v.ilk '.-1071 'ih ' ' . te --- '" . •.'•'--,' ' - _ ... ,.r.-••-.- - --'., 4`14's6,S`;.*C't'::::.-r-,i-••=e.K ,ff.t .,;:. , ,i? '1:14, ,.. /7, , ,./..-0 ,. ,l,„ ,., ,...- -,-,...-7-,....•,...; ......z............;_ -__...;-___:—,--... ' . •-.„....- . .----- "if 11,0•Ity 4 4 .• - •Nik...,......t). AL..- ... . am•PrAC,. Or,„ ,,.... t ':„;-...A,A,,Iffipx.,..,-.7.,,,t7-,-* $4,*„„ - • ...a. ....— ,....-- ., ... ,. -4 • ...7.,,r7:1777 ■,,,. / ..-4 . -"'"-,04'111'. . ....0,44.1• --4's ', re' .1","' _.,,-,,"' - , . •,., i 1,1"1/04ii) -7.''',.'• •''''' -,4-0.-:- ..„;:-4151-%-"""' —'9,±--;a7 --,ii , -,i?..- , ,. ,,,..,-.4;.,, ,, ..esee,..tz....:z. / ...• , ... . ....?.,,t- Itri,4!".- -'."' ..v.7.....,,,...,...... .th,• .•,.. ...,. ...,/.0.„.„ ,,•,q4.4-:.---. .,„...w. If. ,,./ii, 2 , 0'"k•Iiii'14'iv.17,6:'''''.»,ri:4,ri"! t-.1:.'r..,"4",:t.*41.•.21tik•••h%. 111 /'WI't'.,. '•,... ..•.; <',: •' '.:,,,a.M0,7,'...dipf.,••,., 'IAA; ..r ., :14{•'..l• il:4-•.:.:4•1•-•/-,'46".•• 's' 1:•.44.1'14.:1111.4. I I On The Leading Edge Of I Wood Preservation Technology ..:"..t - - _ - '.- III . .- . ■LI.IvtIL -7::. ' '''--'L.': 'smosz:-......--..' _._._..._.__,..,,tt ---wood products- . ( ,.......,,- ; WOOD IS A GOOD BUILDING ��7�"••• � IF IT ISY0''� ��S��S��® IT IS^�,][�I0EA�--` -~ � Wood is a source of food for bacteria, methods. Osmose preservative and FLAME fun i certain species of insects and marine PROOF® LHC7ri fire retardant are utilized organisms. To make wood truly an optimal throughout the JniiedStates and Canada for building material, it must be protected in the treatment of wood products. some manner. The unique Osmose pressure treatment • Out of the technology of twentieth cen- process preserves wood 6v forcing a special � tur�vvasdeveloped a successful method for lOOY6 oxide-pure - by o e-purmvvatarbornepneservative protecting and preserving wood further adding deep into the cellular structure of the wood to its desirability as a vi |a and long-term This vacuum nmssumo process forms a lea bui|dingnaceriad' Oomoue®voodisaurm6uct resistant bond with the wood, producing a '' .mf that technology, a pioneer in the field of superior and almost indestructible building , ' it ipressurized preservative ncand now�o material. Dezncdon6« ni -orQanismo. n- ` ' leading proponent. sects and e|en�enta deterioration, so prevalent ', �� - . Since 1934, Osmose has been a leader in the in untreated wood, ote an increasing � ' ' - � �� research and development of wood preser- recognition f th and ''�' vat�es fire for Wood Osmose '�` r`` vatives, treating rC�snlose Products' � ~� �.�� ~^` . - - � `' _� ' � �'^ ��• ` 7,_ - ,-, , -) I a.,V74,!...„,•-•. ..,...,,.........,e - .-.S.. ■,...',s '$'-r.----•-.--..',...,.....e*.. - .-- .,--Z.:-* .t-.61,Pet,OA rst:Flp.b.4_,,...,_',sj ,,,,,,,, -,-'7 , _ ,,,j„,..-:-,f,-: ,,,,,,-.4.:,•„4.„,,... c.4.•,:,3.-, --r•rj Lto r�° ' irriiir: -----, u� -` tcv -` -^'' ',^' ^lik.°' 'INkca*I '- • .,* '-~^^�.e.~'~^~~��~�-L'^~~��°~��~^.A1m*Y~=^�='^1,`=_-~, - — ^~~~°=~~-� • I WOOD HAS TO DO A TOUGH JOB! OSMOSE WOOD � - OOD PRODUCTS TAKE THE PUNISHMENT •:Y I DAY AFTER DAY., YEAR AFTER YEAR! -,-,F... . xMf •The Osmose pressure treatment process results in a problem-free product that will not pollute the environment, -r'--:---r ' - 't' Iis pleasing in appearance and maintains the strength and workability of wood. - SUPERIOR RESISTANCE TO OUTDOOR EXPOSURE The gray-green coloration of the wood is a _1.M-;" Iresult of the Osmose preservative treatment. _ : Over a period of time, this coloration will ° ,_ ° ?- diminish, changing to a pleasing driftwood gray. There is no need to paint or stain Osmose _: .`:'= Wood Products since the wood is protected .�_ .both inside and outside. However, if you desire to change the color of your structure, please .rte -1 ,••,:,...;_ apply the paint or stain according to the = : manufacturer's recommendations. _ ICLEAN, ODORLESS AND SAFE Osmose Wood Products are clean, dry to the touch, with no offensive odors or irritating - fumes. Osmose Wood Products are ideal for _ 1 use anywhere wood is used in contact with plants, animals or people. Osmose Wood - Products are used wherever environmental Isafety and cleanliness are prime considerations. 1 THE "WET AREAS" OF YOUR HOME NEED EXTRA PROTECTION Special areas in your home deserve the extra protection of Osmose Wood Products. These I so-called "wet areas": kitchens, bathrooms and laundry rooms are highly susceptible to water damage and rot. Use of Osmose pres- sure sure treated wood products builds in protection p in those critical areas. :- t`2'*{ l'�`?R:Efi '�.4.st. ts.' .r--it fit` y+eFc�, +5r3 `. ` S t`-'-; "� '♦ ,-- Y',; >ti•... * ' +.r., imr..i- it a ► 'S'�:` 't a Cs I , }+2"G a '.31.,...-".im~ '±'S �-._•- 'r...t 1,.-,-- .4.0'. '` 11 *' S _tat'l 'II ' III I1f -rf '"t ,,' •'''' ::•.L -4- - ,� '. M i1. it�'�,�;;Iii I,' I I �' } _ }�,` '�•71 .�M :. +.I. .. ∎Go..., r-�'• �•yfT1�' ' I IIi'�III ' ' f lt I 'I �i.P 'ir^� -.t..;.) •.. 1 ' .Y.gil •wt.,hw ^'.°.•-.. _.n . c,.'T1r�ikYt 555 1:I ( ; I f I Iii.: v `. •ai��.. , •#- 'j.y-••=a w,..��'.%.'' ... ,tE7 ..4m I E I I{I )li( i.Q ' .,,� �'t ..: .i :If_ : .mot: <3•:...:.n`,J I.o 1 t1 '.I; � '}: ,,�. ��.,. .r >\. ' ¢b rI. � _ 1 •T} _ c4 ^g9-1 4i .9x1,1: ! ! ` _ {�. •-41 \FNI.-A �•3'- .j+u `.K •",-,. " xk- ..n. - — s "':.l;"i_. -.•,• , '�,t-- f,,, V-a - ",-.7 r a 'R ,, k: ,`r.,,.N t., it I �",„.3.. : .. ; :,k-y a ,- {r 311 ti,,,, 0..-". ♦ 1. -' ,ice '1 �►.1: - _ i .. r1 r. e. y;u;% " s~4.:saaaw.,;...evr. mi ..44a03.74.;ut. .::m'':Argwe rfmgriU.c,.l an:ri nx .- '� ...... f i . • -- ., ik 4.1■1===....m..,,mminnown....-. 11' HIGHLY EFFECTIVE AND LONG LASTING ,- 'PLUS A 40-YEAR GUARAN RESIDENTIAL AND FARM TEE ON APPLICATIONS. . LASTING, - - :?- :- ,;%::",, •..%.4.7:-:;. Wood Preservatives Stake Test • : ------- Condition of Southern Pine Stakes AFTER 30 YEARS '''In. • '...grA4C-. l Sarnacsbla but anonym;Same— Dbstroyed by— I . . ... Deem I Deem Avant,. Tarrant. Termite 1300.y Fungi I Total Mg.- .. . The bonding that locks Osmose _ Prarsranatl. R••ntion No In Teat Omay Attack Attu@ Fong. Taranto@ Tamil. Removed LII• ..." preservative into the cells of the wood 52 • ODsmose — .•.•. a 0 0 0 0 0 0 UNLIMITEO ...•!...' is permanent. Wood stakes treated with .37 ••••• Osmose preservative are still in good _ Coal Tar 8 3 • •• •• • •••• _ • •• ? I condition after 40 years in - - - - - c,eosote — ••••• 0 8.0 •••• 0 — • 0 — -- ' • •• •• •• •••• • •••• • , . - ground contact. .. ........ Rentachlo • , rophenol 5..in 8.2 .•,,•, 0 0 ••••••• •• 0 • • ••. ? 1:. , 44 aromatic oil toto•• THE OSMOSE 40-YEAR - .i------- ....., „ ca,..y.c gas- Q.(., ., a • .. ...... ••• •••• 7 --,-.;` LIMITED WARRANTY --::::"?---'-, bze oinl twaithh, ‘21. ..., •••• 0 0 . . 0 •••• . .■•■ • • +:,.-''''' "- 5 De c ° 120 •••• • • •• • ,3 • •• •• _ , , -_ ..,.y. .„ rophenof' ••. •••• 2 A• - • •. '1/4:-7' ''`- - .7"- •• . 14' A Heavy Gas 011 79 • 0 ••• • • i Lumber warranted by Osmose must ',.. .ths,pen. - - •• 0 ••• chloroohenol , .■....■ 12.0 •••• •• ' — 0 ••• ,, 0 — ? --,-- • I' be used in a residential or farm application . •••• _ 0.1e Reterthon ;!.. . to be covered under the terms of the warranty. The table of retention levels in this brochure will indicate that 0.25 pcf treated lumber covers residential use ABOVE GROUND: while 0.40 pcf treated lumber can be used in GROUND CONTACT or FRESH ---- WATER CONTACT only. For your warranty to remain valid, we suggest that you check with your dealer to make certain that the product you buy is correct for the intended application. Remember to look for the bright yellow Osmose end tag or the ink stamp on "-= .... -.., each piece of lumber. It's your assurance of quality,safety and durability. _ ___...... ._____ r dEsmose e,... -;;,-,-.p..•-: ios-q441.4kt: . ... .., Fars F.-01 ,YEARtz- Illi. . %.4-..q -, I' iik.7‘V, ,A-S•leA.Arf .."-,A' 'A -...* it ',If"- ...,,y• ".-..e4e-s&".;,...11::::-/A I :“... .`",.---... - , __• ' -"fr - : ' dIt \ i-,1',„k,r,--1,_,,,%-0,1491*, 7., is---4 --:-.-e.f,=.-t-,-,'-------_---• --1---:' ,--....4:, ..„...',4,-. .,4-42_4--6A.:-..%.„4,3;V:;;. , , , -...,v- , Ar-.4 - ,,--, „. ,,;474.41.,....!„,_,....44..„.„‘,....a ,_... _ ,...- . ,_...„..,„4„,--,...,...„...,... . . ; ,-, f,.....,,,,,-__,,,,..„- -„,... ......-:_ , 4 ,.. ,.‘ --,,-..,v2w...,z-,..„-. ' .. -''' ". -,. !P,'^ '' Z- "../...t. .1441:1 --1;:, ' --- ." ^..•-• ....,1 -"-2. ..-• .4.• -"4 ';''''4 --,,---; -...4. .f. '1/"" '"'"7, fz="Vr.4....!.. .4 .... - - .f - - --.,,,PTE/74. `....4....,,' :ilMOMe-i.--°"'A 'ET •■ ., .. - .:...r. •--1,Ijr.,:4,4:-.,:f.a4. .. t-•-:-.., _ •-. _:1..'■'`:. , .,,, , . 1,4r...it k,,.....-. -....v. y q'f.`, r., :',....k.,.5.0 Ip--' .----7-----r:771 ' -._ , ''`''''' -,-- .--.1::4pN4---,..,f.. 2,--- . '_. tr.":4;^•• ' •- •,,,•.k‘''',\,1..t.':.:::: .; - . ',.., - ":" 1-.-.- 411761E. ------- Wkz --- "-: ''. __ v_:,,..„...,. . .::,—n' „ .: ,-,1. , , 7----"SL-. • --"--!.."'--.ci - -.: = _ ,-,,,,...;,.',V,-.2-,'IN,:.,,,,,,,,,, -„,,,,.s• , „.. ...--,-, ., ' ,,==_&e-,\ t--_ ....,!„. . -• ...-,--. .. 7..i.-„.....,- .. .. ,.,,,,,...,....,...„......... .:-?, .;;_:,.. ..,. __ ,..r,!•,,,,.„).„. .---,..- -•„... -...---.„ i. . ------.• .. f - ,•,,,.... .,...... -..--:•••.,--. .--... 1. 7, -4,-..,..= ..., , x „e.• 0-4.2.`--''.'::. •••'''.', ;,s.'"ff4--... •.1,,„1,....,'-c.-•,--,-'- ',.. 7." "..:...,.V.z.?..e',;'.l..:,*„:-..: *-„.” 1;. : 1_-4._,_,,,.•■•_. . ":•E7,:..:.--i • .•.. ..;; , . .. ... '.1.t •', •' _ . --- r, i :,.. ,, .,.,,,, • , . .II ='' '. • . n- :•.f.4-!... '. . . ., -— .-- , I I ---__- - • - • '• -'---- ----- `"----------.._______. ' . •,'' "ro, -=--, , -.,:.,.-, 1 . ,1 II , II II I I c 1111 i l' I 4 „ ..„,, ...._,,,t0„,iza- --.4. r.: 7 IF • , , ' i , .;" 1 • Illiyi --- , 4 f i 1 -- ! i: in 11111 '• !I:1:-' I .4-11-- - '*,, , 4;74 4.,.- - 1 , I 1 ----*, ' I ' A• 4 . I •,..:#..e, l' .!:1/4-4- -., • I- ,„. Azt . --___ " A •14, :e4.87;' . .' . -" . 1 I :.%:!' •- I' --1,,,, ,-, "SO!. • r.o.., :. _ .• -. 4''.---.;-.• 7- ':'. . .■:;■.i.- i ' -. • ' '!1..! ' ''' ' -.. • ' .1.'. i•-' 1 1 , --, _.- - • . - - „ - . .. . ,. . _ It ( -..... -:-.,9•. - - - ..• e 1, m . ....efr:'Z'Illl -': :•-•;:',..9_5'Z..'7:-.204,:f.:4--......4.7f$,A. ...,:"_: '_-- , - '..-7 • . ...........,.....,„ •-• ...An..,ac.-...,-,....aost •,.... -. • - • .. .-. . .. • , - 1.,-.r...t.t.,-•;.. -It.v....:.-r.s....,••••,.1....ur....:manoar,Wanrik.itmoidgmi-6,16evra...r.vardgesumlisiggiAe• ' •-` ,. „s e,. i- wood products OSMOSE QUALITY IS A GOOD INVESTMENT... NOW, AND FOR THE LONG-TERM! Structures built with Osmose Wood Pro- of choice for residential construction. A sound ducts have a decided edge over those built home is a sound investment. € with ordinary, untreated wood. From a finan- Osmose Wood Products can lower the risk F cial point of view, an Osmose home or building to the lender, builder and buyer, as well as hav- _ is a sound investment, returning sizeable long- ing a pronounced effect on insurance rates. term gains for the owner. The investment potential and the peripheral In simplistic terms, Osmose wood's values of building with Osmose have shown a resistance factors build in supra-ordinary dramatic increase in the longevity of the struc- benefits. Longevity, the major feature of ture as well as returning a sizable dividend at Osmose wood makes it the building material the time of re-sale. vim; - : �� " PL500 DECK PL500 Deck and Treated Lumber Adhesive is a • AND , _ • TREATED special formulation for pressure treated wood. The : - _ . _ 4 TREATED Osmose approved PL500 adhesive provides a better * ADHESIVE and safer way to build. Using this advanced, adhesive -- - - _ product you can achieve a more appealing, smoother surface for your deck, patio or outdoor project. You can use fewer nails, and fewer nails will make a more attractive project. Wood �� .„ -: , � M,,,. splintering is minimized. Nail heads popping u clothing g P - .1 (-T t 7. � d?,.\ .� from the surface to snag toes or clothing will Li- c.i�� O a ° �;.�.,� �at� ♦ � be a thing of the past. PL500 cures to a super • ' "'- �� . strong bond. Ask for PL500 wherever - ' Osmose Wood Products are sold. OSMOSE WOOD PRODUCTS. LIMITED ONLY BY YOUR IMAGINATION. The versatility and adaptability of Osmose Wood Products are limited only by your imagination. Osmose pressure treated timbers, lumber and plywood are suitable for many different decorative and structural applications. RESIDENTIAL - Patios. Balconies. Trim. „�,,,,�,�,� �• z Siding. Sill Plates. Foundations. Fences. Decks. '` $ r Wet Areas. • INDUSTRIAL -Warehouses. Shipping Ter- `�: _ ;.i,'41R1�t" "` i minals. Wet Process Industries. Loading Docks. L ., , qtr i �f Pallets. ' . , .- . RECREATIONAL - Playground Equipment. 4 - :'.. t _' Stadium Seating. In-Ground and Above Ground ;-'' ""i \F" Swimming Pool Framing. Walls and Decking. L. Outdoor Furniture. Amusement Parks. AGRICULTURE - Barns. Livestock Ramps UTILITIES - Crossarms. Distribution Poles. and Enclosures. Fence Posts. Pole Buildings. Light Poles. Barricades. Arbors. Equipment Storage Sheds. Plant LIGHT CONSTRUCTION - Office Stakes. Greenhouses. Buildings. Churches. Stores. Shopping Malls. MARINE - Floating Docks. Decking. Step RAILROADS - Ties. Platform and Car Stringers. Engine Beds. Boat Storage Sheds. Decking. Sign Posts. Poles. Fence Posts. Piling. Cradles. Sea Walls. Jetties. Piers. Piling. Groins. Bridge Timbers. LANDSCAPING - Bulkheads. Retaining GOVERNMENT - Highway Guardrails and Walls. Tables. Benches. Patios. Edging. Steps. Sign Posts. Picnic Tables and Shelters. Beach Decks. Planters. Gazebos. Decorative Fencing. Houses and Boardwalks. Outdoor Furniture. I. A. ..■11RMNISMIN■Rmosmilausimminimmungmlit a END-COATING FOR WESTERN SPECIES SPECIFICATIONS SALTS vs. OXIDES. There are basically tw End coating is recommended for all hard-to- All timbers, lumber,pilings and plywood types of CCA wood preservatives: Salts an treat Western Species. All freshly cut or ex- marketed under the Osmose trade name-are Oxides.The Salt formulation is a chemically in- posed surfaces, bolt holes and machined areas, pressure treated with 100% oxide-pure ferior CCA preservative because of impuriti should be liberally coated with a special preservative. This preservative meets the in the ingredient mix. These chemically infer Osmose preservative available from your American Wood-Preservers' Association Stan- ingredients, when used for wood treatment, licensed Osmose treating plant. dard P-5 and Federal Specification TT-W-550. bloom to the surface to produce unacceptable Osmose preservative is applied into the wood residues which can corrode metal fasteners al� in a closed cylinder by unique leach into the environment. I APPROVALS yinder b a uni ue vacuum- OXIDES vs. OXIDES. Even among oxide pressure process in accordance with the ap- formulations there can be a significant dif- Fed.Spec.TT-W-550 and TT-W-571; proved standards and recommended treating ference in quality. That difference is in the Federal Housing Administration; Department Practices covering specific wood products as g p purity of the oxide preservative ingredients. of Housing and Urban Development; Veterans listed in the AWPA Standards Manual. Unlike low-grade oxide preservatives, Osmo Administration; American Association of State The retention of Osmose preservative is is the highest purity 100% oxide CCA-C Highway and Transportation Officials; U.S. specified at 0.25 pounds per cubic foot of preservative available in the wood preserving Bureau of Public Roads; The Naval Engineering wood(pcf/oxide basis)for moderate service industry. While low quality treated wood pro Facilities Command; Corps of Engineers;Air (farm and residential construction)and 0.40 ucts face a growing liability, Osmose Wood Force; General Services Administration; pcf/oxide basis for severe conditions(farm and Produce are environmentally safe` and clean. American Wood-Preservers' Association; residential construction)such as in-ground or •when bandied and used in accordance with Osmose guidelines. American Railway Engineering Association;All (non-structural)fresh water contact. The Model Building Codes; Many state highway specified retention for treated wood subject AWPA departments, local and city building codes. to severe ground contact(wood foundations, STANDARD RETENTIONS structural)is 0.60 pcf/oxide basis. The i specified retention for treated wood piles Applications Retention• Typical Uses ---, , : t (structural)subject to fresh water contact is Above Ground o 25 Decking.Fencing.• Uses Sills.Railings,joists 41i ... • 4 0.80 pcf/oxide basis. The specified retention ""` ' -T•_ - for treated wood subject to marine exposure Soil or Fresh Water Posts.landscape iti. 7F.� -�� Contact . e-. s _, .0 e-r --$ is specified at 2.5 cf/oxide basis. o.ao Timbers.Grape Stakes. 71b r L a 1...:71j--.--11. P (Nonstructural) Retaining,tic T Walls -e 'v. ,v,.zc-' , ,g - -Soil or Presh WateF -'-" '''•t` `"° Y"i . ::••r $: ; _ w .� 1•..'Contact -.9.6e _-r,- dFtam�tlmnt, t i r-% _ 0-e. (Slruclurall: -- �C�`gg��' POD __ _cam-J.7 rt.. - 3 t i� •.�.*;• • - ///,'/ Piles•Soil or Fresh t Water Contact `0.80 y as �-\ -:Foun Uon Ptln 'Sail(Structural) ..c,--� ff's r C s+<t�. «_} r.•. :tt � �i, 4 't0-ftna .Y � Mat..o-y != ,.ss: r---, " arJ f rte- .. c- 'Pounds per cubic loot.Minimum retentions conform to standards of "-. the American Wood-Preservers Association. TECHNICAL OR GENERAL QUESTIONS CONCERNING ANY OF THE INFORMATION SUPPLIED IN THIS BROCHURE ABOUT OSMOSE WOOD PRODUCTS CAN BE ANSWERED BY' CALLING THE OSMOSE TOLL-FREE HOTLINE: 1-800-522-WOOD (522-9663)...,... .. e\,.._.,----)-1 . --._r : 5i "The Trusted Name In Wood Preserving" TM wood products Wood Preserving Division I P.O. Drawer 0 • Griffin, GA 30224-0249 • (404)228-8434 • I I • Osmose•and FLAME PROOF'•are registered trademarks of Osmose Wood Preserving, Inc. LHC TM is a trademark of Osmose Wood Preserving.Inc. ,.HM o.noso Weed Preserving,I�i il , , T._ . -•ce • .....___.................._. I .M , ,,, brand. , 4„ r_,.. .... t.. f f PM_. v. ,,, . . . 1: -- ._,.. .: .„.. ,..„.._ . i : 1111 ni' C I 4:1:-...._. I - I I i - .:."- .:.----1110e°1'1.+".:2.5- 'YS.i. 14�, -r sae w -..T ._ _� 1 to { is t --' a_ -1....16...,-.4"..: vb ;�•' e' - �+,+ '3w >- lyjj>4�•Y f2`, Y S %. _ 4�f . 4 -51Y. >,3ii .,+cam ^*�''1".':i� * ' :� 3 t~ 41.�: 3 �tF1 A J Zv. z.6:tea` .♦.ts Yf ;.0 a51- ',. 7- _ :^-"L_ae''-- a y�'3‘" i c i y tr i , +3 hi:- t'0 J.i ,i • • �r Y\`�_;•e 'rf'. .'may- � �'�i;,#�, " �_ 1 i ,:?„1:-.1::::_i:— y I.. , ', --., ;1.--z...;.;i '4'■ ..I. .i-1-- -.-,T.%-t-.-1.-- ,-,.... . - . � :�: t f::>: : fir . . ;: ;„..:,,,,.:,,,,,f ..7-1-7,-- 7k'----': :r 6 t••-• '_- • . t `1-17:ft -1;--1:.-:`;,.:,T.-;:777:pr-,:,=y'7”i''-' T. - ' ' / `• '-44-ilx 1,-..: __'.:•.. t " ''.t.:,'‘Li;.:Ks. I.: ..:..-,.i; ii,1-",q1.4-4.4:: :, :::2,`-1.-1, ..; i.,, ;--,:, _ -, • -: l �. ~ i' Ii i• 1:1;:t,, r i r I: a t .r..f ' .q-_ � `." t}.t..•r.„i ; '1!..1:!''.' _� i,: , ■ ; - 4 :! ;t; `..i- : }� )18!I, s . :'i ...�_ . f', -f - - flit.;` ' `X i=1-=; :.:ti:p;e' ^.e-:,,1 I ti_ — _ - II li ,I • 11:i!-: ' ;€. J . '1�_ ' . 'i : :r•, 1. 4:_ii^. c . _ r iJi iilP•.ifi.•i:1. i i - • , a p r--� • T.71 , ■ ter r:.�;!1�^ C�';!'�`_♦<. wvo°'..�'-c�'swil .;t♦•" . ■ .�-u .w. !'f..+ [[ •�.. -Mf..V-.:f♦ - •- _f:i r.... .-J Yom• .. -b.�- - ,1..M.w.'4ir}t..:.•'' .. -.-' • - _ ZiLY :, - jj-• ..-Y.. "•a'tf f_�.�J..1 •.-A�fQ J' w. • Yt . , f ~-ham M •. `, ,. � •'• K` '• 4.1 . 1 ' .r- i • •• . ., r, ..?f . i.41 !4_435, •.04.• N.,‘....r. I - . . .......-. .4 f .. . . - 1 ... . • . , { — y • • • R ` :Y:! 2 { , 4- oi � � o ` K A„. ,r It.:.4. I Keeping Pa � g c e With America's Changing Agriculture -... - ) srnose -wood products t- .. Osmose® Pressure Treated Wood Products ± ).•- _ � Optimize Wood Protection In The ::: Agricultural Environment . . -,,! - �,-.: . _ = z Osmose Pressure Treated Wood Is q--�;`. The Ideal Farm Building Traditcnally, wood has always been the `-r aF Material. preferre: building material for agricultural use, even wit- its drawbacks. With the advent "'Yx"'�. Osmose'Wood Products are preferred of Osmcse Wood Products, the weaknesses ,p', x *` i over other building materials for quite a . inherent n untreated and poorly treated wood l '� ` number of reasons. The number-one reason have bee:-all but eliminated. Economically t' is that Osmose wood puts a stop to biological speaking. there is a lot of sound reasoning in _�� -- - wood destruction and provides years of choosing Osmose Wood Products for use "' trouble-free service. on the fa-n. r '':' ` �.-�r r •t,: „ ,2 •, t 1.- „, w...% - f`1-.a ''='-,... . -s °` z•" ism..�. „„- ! r: s ; rr& v-..: war r-----':...f- --�� , - ` ' -L - t _ ---=----z-:i_ - 'w_ 'v -i yam'' ,.- �w _ 4.�' '.'te z - * ` + r.S a ''' .* ., -- f - r 1.- S x "< :e1? 't" sa • : •R r }as *. �� Y - n . .e.i:y ,o,;� F s _ •Z .._ r.....e'11�� •-,', �.. .�-- , .i r__-_;.‘ ,-------,-,---t,P,i,- "4.,4'i.' r7-4s �e. t,7.�-'L 1 41.'1'4 f q5: ,� \`:'g .yN Z S.x �.,4 s 4y ., : . "' 5: =4Q�.- 7� !a:_whom.•;'yl r.. ,. `°''c ' `2 ''� +-.-1> •:`i.. w+'1l .... 4,4:‘_yA le+. 3 ±.-Vis%?::.._^,>... ; -...,--.e.-- �1 � Y, t3 '�+ - Tests conducted by the USDA on stakes 1. , r: • treated with Osmose preservative have --•shown a resistance to termite and decay X.,,...1,, A - , ,a,�fi �y ;.� � ', �� _ �,- t ��s.�k ; damage for over 40 years. This independent `', "r- c - �, -, ' 'Y? ' r .i and impartial . .,- _. '.. ;0.,_ .,� testing agency predicts Y P service _^.....:. "". fi' _ �� , �;. r�.�., - ,,�� yam. ,L' P S g is a se ;��:s._,�_..y_. -'� a ,il�r° . . a ,�.'. ,;4 K ,�•life for Osmose preservative treated materials . '�`:': f. `'� ;,-„-;::-....r.,• ' _• .. of 5 to 10 times longer than �. _AL g an untreated ":,• ,.:* '". .. ' ti ' 2,-/` ' lumber. In addition, Osmose Wood Products : `=:» :�f'= "s" ` ; '.e'�t�,' - "f `� . are ideal for use ,:. .M1 r1 : ' r* t - .- _ ..1 • ' se in direct-contact situations f"•• •' `- ,- �! '-�� =_ _ � � withfarm A^;i;�:` .. .:S,r;:�r:..• �,:...:< :. - :.. _ :,.: arm crops. _ .,, �:'� ,."te, �:.'. ;',.7;-:`'-' .�. ,;. .:' �_�.`4, _, 4 -.+... alollf.Y�-:�.-r.C'.►1:`'.2_r»'Swt wr..^.'.!..; ya +41+••- (F `P- F.� I '� „ vii`' _ _.. PAN 4. �.>_ . •: •'+ +�a:L_.• .. {mil } �1- •�• a iw - '• T ~ ,7 K rp. .tea, '' 4 1-4.,, .. -... S� i.4 • ii 1 ! ._ i 1kt- a.. + , L 0.4.0:-.1r•,, . •tilt{ � '' ,a 3� ' ,. -.L - - �� l t� i t � t ± `yr ` Y ..ra+ :: - 1 : U'- a...,.a`i -_ .,� - ''le' Vie T ' • L�•. ---'^ , - '' - '- 3 t • ra ; ;� y�4' �._ `'Lw a M •a • !.!•y ' ` t rl� y , V ' ,n L, 4 -�,_, ,._ -i •_.- ,�e ..-, ' �'... - 'F. S • •-I • '7��w.:- - ` - 'r-'+r 1'•'' •.-'; e• -► • f I IOsmose Wood Products...The Ideal Building Material For Livestock Enclosures Osmose Wood Products are environmentally Farm fencing, so often overlooked, is Ili . safe for all types of livestock. The 100% oxide- another popular use of Osmose posts and -" '` :„y pure waterborne preservative used by Osmose lumber. Wood posts are better able to absorb . .',''','''^: E F;. r[' I licensed treaters permanently fixes with the the shock and stresses of livestock and still keep b 1, wood fibers. No harmful vapors. An important their shape. Metal posts can become bent, rust ' factor to consider, since animal weight gain and and damaged permanently by this kind of abuse. r ,. j '. ,*: - I productivity are directly related to animal The longevity and subsequently, economics o4,t_:,;!.. comfort and health. using Osmose fence posts argue a good case . - `- ” .1`. ,§E" The cleanliness of Osmose Wood Products is for their use in the farm environment. '„_.__% r (-. another of the reasons why smart farmers For pasture fencing, barbed wire can be nailed to '�sf• IImake Osmose the product of choice for use in directly to the post, or wire can easily be con- -"1,_ 7` confined livestock enclosures, barns, shelters, nected to insulators for electrified fence applica-lica- `.T , laying parlors and farm buildings of all types. tions. The fact is, Osmose Wood Products 1 I s-outlast the competition 10 to I I. ��R t: .IPA .` SAititiirtitilt. IFor Maximum Crop Yield, Osmose e Is A Name You Should Know And Trust. I Capital expenditures for farm operations leave little And,those small details that go unchecked and un- over the long haul.The reasons are simple:elimination margin in today's farm income for frequent repair and noticed can quickly become expensive headaches.You of frequent replacement:resistance to rot,decay and construction costs.That's why it's so important to have all the facts when you're buying treated don't need those kinds of problems...especially from treated wood.Osmose Wood Products can do away termite damage and no crop loss because of preser- vative migration.So,you can use Osmose Wood Pro- wood...facts that will stack the odds in your favor with unnecessary worry because the high-quality ducts for crop support stakes,horticultural applica- ' Don't take chances with your harvest by using a sub- Osmose preservative stays in the wood where is tions,fencing,greenhouses,farm buildings and water- standard pressure treated wood.Know what you're belongs.NO IRRITATING VAPORS.NO SURFACE getting before you buy Insist on Osmose Wood Pro- RESIDUES.NO ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS.Can ing troughs. Add it up.If you're paying for constant replacement ducts. you trust your livelihood to less than Osmose Wood and poor yield,you're losing money.Doesn't it make A lot of time and money goes into making your Products? farm a profitable business.There use doesn't seem to sense to replace those problems with Osmose Wood I The use of Osmose Wood Products in the Products? I be enough hours in each day to check on everything. agricultural environment can prove to be beneficial ..r l^ Wood Preservatives Stake Test Condition of Southern Pine Stakes AFTER 30 YEARS L * + `"� ( S.rricobN but showing some— } ..- 9 Destroyed by— l•. . I �' I i; ;► _ 777.1—n;.--- - ' Decay& I Average Termite Tar to Decay `I I i�. DecaY Fungi• Total Avg. 11,1 , u i , r, k,i.lf,.4'`e, i1- I.; ?ya Preservative Retention No.In Test Decay Attack Attack Fungi Termites Termites Removed Life • I t •mow'•`^"�."� T� ' I .' __1 °' �1 - "t w. � t� _ i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 UNLMTED•••37 •••• • r coal Tar 8.3 • • ..i , • i i j i i Creosote ----- :eO O • O e3~i e "•111 L I .. ,•M - i .Fl ., . ��. . a,'' _ i 4#IT Pentacnlo- ! $j j.rK..�71;�• roohenol5%i in ,: •- 8 2 •• • 0 .. 0 • • • •• 0 • •' ; X. ' t • ` �r°1�" y ! te _ yw el aromatic al Is :44E4.; ,i _ ' _ 4, $4 s ; .',;c0,047,7... + 4 y mow' st_�, 4 q .i°+� °' "1_! i.+ y 4s ° e ah""3'Eq �• c ialy0c gas. base oil with 8.0 O • :•• ••••5° Pentacnlo- •• O O �. O 12.0-:e -- f ;;K- 4r �2r oonenol' • 213 I ..- Heavy Gasnts 7 9 :• O • • • =wdn 5°e pants- •• O 1 e• :�•cnloroonenci ..• .. • 'Code Relent. y.� c : Li'..;:,-'-`,t, .....a iy-.0'0 ID`1,}y, !:•.tiTee t �w.irz ►iY;�;r Istlt.t yr�f r .r 'rt r�.,, ri :,. T 'r .1..-5-....,44., --1 - T �•G�M�°. +ltip►t �Alil�� W F. M' yajsS,'ACM' `&'!..''` l :14....j ' F � .i ?I• 3�,e1� 4 ►<rn" y..-, .'...to .. , .-,(.`y a?-'v 1 '- arcs �-1•t''�.1. •s" -;V4 1 t• \_ y r t.,... - ,• x .,7�t. t*' -..........,_;„,6., •e• . ris j •�. o�!?Y� i" , er- , • — _ . r X11 Especially In Thegricnitaralnvironanent, Choosing T Right Wood For The Right g he ght fob Is Critical. I Simplify Your Life By Avoiding SPECIFICATIONS Problems. Specify Osmose Wood Products. All timbers, lumber and plywood marketed SALTS vs. OXIDES. There are basically two One of the joys of farm life can be its under the Osmose name are pressure treated types of The Salt wood preservatives: Salts and in- simplicity. You don't need the aggravations of with Osmose 100% oxide-pure preservative. Oxides. The Batt formulation is a a chemically in- constant maintenance. That's why you chose This preservative meets the American Wood- in the CCA preservative because of impurities Osmose Wood Products. Before Osmose, Preservers' Association Standard P-5 and in the ingredient mix. These chemically inferior fence posts had to be replaced every three Federal Specification TTW-550. Osmose ingredients, when used for wood treatment, years; splashboards, outbuildings, barns and preservative is applied into the wood in a bloom to the surface to produce unacceptable plant stakes quickly succumbed to the ravages closed cylinder by a patented vacuum-pressure residues which can corrode metal fasteners and of termites, rot and decay process in accordance with the approved stan- leach into the environment. No more. On the leading edge of wood dards and recommended treating practices OXIDES vs. OXIDES. Even among oxide preservation technology, the people at covering specific wood products as listed in formulations there can be a significant dif- preservation are working successfully to eradicate the AWPA Standards Manual. TECHNICAL Terence in quality That difference is in the wood's inherent weaknesses. We know, and QUESTIONS CAN BE ANSWERED purity of the oxide preservative ingredients. you should, too, that wood doesn't have to BY CALLING OUR TOLL-FREE Unlike low-grade oxide preservatives, Osmose rot, decay or fall prey to insect infestation. HOTLINE: 1-800-522-WOOD(522-9663). is the highest purity 100°o oxide CCA-C The technology is already in place and work- industry retention of Osmose preservative is preservative available in the wood preserving ing for you. Our unique pressure treatment specified at 0 25 pounds per cubic foot of industry While low quality treated wood prod-' ing for you. Our in unique ique pressure ssu, far superior ent wood(pcf/oxide basis) for moderate service ucts face a growing liability, Osmose Wood (farm and residential construction)and 0 40 Products are environmentally safe' and clean. to ordinary untreated wood; retains the pcf/oxide basis for severe conditions(farm strength of wood and the workability of and residential construction)such as in-ground When handled and used in accordance with Osmose guidelines. wood without the undesirable problems of or fresh water contact. The specified reten- I RETENTIONS other treatment processes. tion for treated wood subject to severe AC ground contact(wood foundations)is 0.60 STANDARD RE pcf/oxide basis. Application. Retention' Typical Uses >t l< A° `•�-�y" Above Ground A'-'- 'a `r'` "..: v ` 0.25 Decking,Fencing, --P _ �S. #1. t s '- -f .' - ►i�. ai... k�!•t�� Usea SJIa.Railings,foists +i f— �# Z' - t '.,...- tir �'Ha( 4 ae.:,C.„,,i -r T F3 .' 4-- a .a� ''k 'a�, Sod or Fresh Water Posts landscape I•' 6 ai T i+s- i - ::y.- -•`�;\'�. Contact 0A0 Timbers.Grape Stakes. ` - {£: " 4r�`'+LS- at }?,?'�,: .. +Ll t. INon-Structural) RetaimnR Waits 1r=-- !. ns-.: " . `, ,A- • exa' '`♦rY..f`•,...r k_ I -• v3 ,,. '_' sr. f t ��-si'v ( Soil or Fresh Water ` - yjj �°r' s; Wood Poundetioru, ' _ ys�,, r r 3 � _ t y �` t iyly� ��...' Contact O.fiO t'-:>{f r '� .—.(. ,��_..- sue`'-, �r�.[s i'. `"r 4-.' 7.*:_':--R i )Structural) Building Poles _ g'"s f' +F i y _ Aj PileaSml or Fresh K' ` .,,SAT-, Water Contact 0.80 Foundation Piles {._..,a y,,. - , , /�IF U!'61,'t\F. -�� (Structural) ,.ry // t t \� k�+� - -. rc - �K, r i \ _Bait Water - _.%i/ l t�t\\�\\ Contact _1.S Bulkhead Mack, •=7: , - _ I Croms .„j / 1,, 'Pounds per cubic foot M,nunum rerenuons conform to standards of the American Wood•Preservers Assocunon 10 j ¢z ? "The Trusted Name In Wood Preserving" TM 3 T # ' wood products I Osmose'is a registered trademark of Osmose Wood Preserving,Inc. Wood Preserving Division P.O. Drawer 0 • Griffin, GA 30224-0249 • (404)228-8434 I I I S WILL w ovn000 Wood rrtivio1,Inc. — ' ('`1(,,E i )i r , , , i HR1.111A;N -ROD i�l-RNK-�-�,_, 1 11iF i; 1 IfE_ ( '_i!! ''„ I ) I I IIi tat ion Rant. ( R ) Data.tia•_-. ili,di, -iI FR 30813-01 R IRIOLF`-, and RECI L(- i _ll_IN': FF DERA[ (.I_I lMtIFIlt.AT ti:irlS uIiMMi`5sIOF1 I47 CFR Part 97 - t PRB- 1 : FCC 85-506l I t ederal Preemption of :' tate and Local Regulations Pertaining to Amateur Radio F-cit_ i l i t i e s 1 Wednesday , `,ep t eml_e r 25 . 1 385 AGENCY : Federal Communications Commission . IACTION : Dec laratc ry ruling , SUMMARY : This document declares a iimitr'd preemption of state and local I ��1lat inns h,hic roc u.de amateur, c mmu.nr i 31 lnr The ru-i ino 1- necessary so that amateurs ari,J I caJ gave r n l ng Dc':J l os 3.1 i e ,1, 1 1 he aware of the = Irony federal interest in promoting amateur communications , The effect of the ruling Iis to give local communities and amateur operators a clear statement of the federal interest in amateur communications . ADDRESS : Federal Lornmunications Comml ',sion , Washington , DC 20554 . FUR FURTHER INFORMATI(IN CONfAC.T : Mauri.ce J . DeF'nnt , Private Radio Bureau, Washington , DC 20554 , (202) 6=1,2-69G4 , I I iii- I I • • • SUPPLEMENTARY I1•l1 IPM:;-, !-!-11.1 : 1 List of `_;ubjec.ts in .1 I-LR Part 97 Amateur rdio , Antennas , Radi,. , Memorandum 1-'pinion and Order to Amateur the atteriof .Federal epree ,tlnn of state and local regulations pertaining M\ -1 . Adopted : September 16 , 1985 . Released : September 19 , 1985 . ' By the Commission : Commissioner Rivera not participating . Background 1 . On July 16 , l '.:1811 . the American Radio Relay League , Inc . (AR!':L) filed a Request for Issuance of a Declaratory killing ust inq us to delineate the 1 imitat ions of local Zoning and other local and .state regulatory authority ove Federally- I. lcense�d radio facilities . Specifically ,{� - ' locally , 1hr:� ARRL wanted ,3 r1 expl lci � statement that ui'uld preempt all local ordinances which •rovabl F y preclude or Awitil:antly leer! ibif f +e five , rG1iable d(ridtr it l' adio r�Crmmu.nlC3t nr, Ih ace:now eges that Local aafhorl t le^ Can regLila.te amateur instal tations. to insure the safety and health of persons in the community , but believes that those regulations cannot be so restrictive that they preclude effective amateur communications . 2 . Interested parties were advised that they could file comments in the . _ }- 1 l kith c xten, ion Ci mments were due or or bef,e,re 1 Ftce 1' f 26 ,_ 4 , with r,:1t j comment- due on or Le f ore January _ , `io 11 _ 1 over sixteen hundred comment•., were filed . t- NTI, P1_t0ii,: notice , August JI1 , 1 '_�ii4 , Mimeo . Ml1 , E. - 9S 49 FR _iEi 1 -' September 1 4 , 1 '_184 `- t I J , FN2 Public Noticed , December H . 1984 , Mimeo No . 14'11:; . FIN; Order , h, ,.:,_mber 0 . 1984 , 1`11mer-, , No . 77t-t , -oc al Ordinances between . is � {{ rc"�1r71r ] radio antennas and locl au h - , Ies reg der1rl re= r1 _t1 ' ordinanCc '= are common . amateur operator ,. 1 by the recjuldtl!,nti ntaii i 1 in ",-�rt ' rulet rules do no ; ! !rili t the heirjt1t of an amateur antenna but •,•_,.lie for o r avt .11ltirl .:alety reasons . that certain FDA notification =1n.1 I- t i .ir': l ,, gal ,.,rocodltl ,_- must be followed for antennas which exceed ��t)tt fr�e�t lie hel.- tit ibn, , _ antenna -. •:Ir. ,_ _, _) '1rolJn,_. , �,vel or ti rife tr.-, be erected near airports . Ihus r_C11del fides some ma� our an t i aria 1 upport Jtrl: tui e require lf s t rJC t l cn mart 3n1 li ghting, �l 1 l? .0 (1,-c rane l ocal runlcipal i t 1 . -, or live 1 ilnq - oilt5 frecleltly enac t f1r; ljl l . n - l til! i11te1 ra drliJ tit,.,.11 support •_• trtict,-tro., in height and 1 or rear yards , or health. -afery or iii• thet is I I F II , =a8 ; 3-Ill PAGE 3 5 ' consid.•° •l.tions , These limiting regulations• can result in conflict because / a1•;e the effect :; mess of the rommunir3-tions that emanate from n amateur radio station are d ii tly dependent upon the location and the height of the antenna. nmatrr operators maintain that they are precluded from operating in certain Ibands allocated for there use if the height of their antennas is limited by a local ordinance . 4 . Examples of restrictive local ordinances were submitted by several amateur operators in this proceeding . Stanley J . Cichy , San Diego , California, noted feat in an ['ieq am3 er_t r�`�io antes s come under' striicture� rte trr arh i h II limits buildi.ng- rieights to ,,p fleet , nThu_s , antennas here are also J. imlted to 30 feet , Alexander Vrenios , Mundelein , Illinois wrote that an ordinance of the IVillage of Mundelein provides that an antenna must be a distance from the Property line that is equal to one and one -half times its height . In his case , he ihs limited to an antenna tower for his amateur station just over 53 feet in rr.5. John C . Chapman , an amateur living in Bloomington , Minnesota, commented - that he was not able to obtain a building permit to install an amateur radio antenna exceeding 35 feet in height because the Bloomington city ordinance restricted "structures" heights to 35 feet . Mr . Chapman said that the Iordinance , when written , undoubtedly applied to buildings but was now being applied to antennas in the absence of a specific ordinance regulating them . There were two options open to him if he wanted t engage in amateur Icommunications . He could request a variance to to ordinance by way of a • hearing before the City Council , or he could obtain affidavits from his neighbors swearing that they had no objection to the proposed antenna installation . He got the building permit after obtaining the cooperation of Ihis neighbors , His concern , however , is that he had to get permission from F: ppO C le �a{{n e { t rtll d G'f{ e t �� ly engage irl radi0 communications for l Ic��a 1e uo a bar 1 1 oe 2.2at�ri� i T.. . E . In addition to height restrictions , other limits are enacted by local IJurisdictions--anti-climb devices on towers or fences around them ; minimum distances from high voltage power lines : minimum distances of towers from property lines ; and regulations pertaining to the structural soundness of the IIRntheanAii6nstalbiet.tonpabllY .anklh Artneyadatebg cdiotnoarbirttNetbemetlmpaty prohibitive , non-refundable application filing Fee.- to obtain a permit to erect an antenna installation and those provisions in ordinances which regulate antennas for purely aesthetic reasons , The amateurs contend , almost Iuniversally , that "beauty is in the eye of the beholder . " They assert that an antenna installation is not more aesthetically displeasing than other objects that people keep on their property , e . g , motor homes , trailers , pick -up trucks , solar collectors and gardening equipment . IRestrictive Covenant; 7 . Amateur operators also oppose restrictions on their amateur operations Iwhich are contained in the deeds for their homes or in their apartment leases . Since theme restrictive covenants are contractual agreement^ between parties , they are not generally a matter of concern to `the Commissionprivate However , since some amateurs who commented in this proceeding provided us with 'examples of restrictive covenants , they are included for information , Mr . I I I II vnGE Eugene 0 . Thomas of Hollister , California included in his comments an extract of the fleclarat��n of Covenants and Rci.strict_ic�ns for Ridgemark Estates , County o .,an Benito , ..,rate of i•alltornla. It provides ; No antenna for transmission or reception of radio signals shall be erected outdoors for use by any dwelling unit except upon approval of the Directors . No radio or television signals or any other form of electromagnetic radiation shall be permitted to originate from any lot which may unreasonably interfere w th th i r tion of television or rail o -ignal - up n an other lot , ilarshajl Bison , Jr . provided a copy o - tie restrictive covenant contained in deeds for the Bell Martin Addition 2 , Irving , Texas . It is binding upon all of the owners or purchasers of the lots in the said addition , his or their heirs , executors , administrators or assigns . It reads : No antenna or tower shall be erected upon any lot for the purposes of radio operations . William J . Hamilton resides in an apartment building in Gladstone , Missouri . stH cites a clause in his lease prohibiting the erection of an antenna, He ates that he has been forced to give up operating amateur radio equipment except a hand-held 2 meter ( 144-1Li; MHz ) radio transceiver . He maintains that I he should not be penalized just because he lives in an apartment . Other restrictive covenants are less global in scope than those cited above . For example , Robert Webb purchased a home in Houston , Texas , His deed roof iineon prohibited "transmitting or receiving antennas extending above the H Amateu r o erato tgenerally oppose restrict t lve ro / nantts for -et etal reasons . lhe maintain that such restriction limit the places that they y can reside if they want to pursue their hobby of amateur radio , Some state that they impinge on First Amendment rights of free speech . Others believe that a constitutional right is being abridged because , in their view , everyone has a r gh to access the al w v regardless of where the live , J . the contrary neliet Held by housing subdivision communities and condominium or homeowner ' s associations is that amateur radio installations constitute cep&thteHair�r fae hot e( tdts:�Q',tsiritig fndri�,hl;regtafd•l p��Fj Ga g�c�N +§ttfe(ghtfib.tm4 t�lif ct from the aesthetic and tasteful appearance of the housing development or ' apartment complex . To counteract these negative consequences , the subdivisions and associations include in their deeds , leases or by-laws restrictions and I lmita$$ on• f�n the- location and height of antennas o r ir- some c,. them altogether . t CS 3son, anc4tui It hk� rr?strlc. 1Ve t- �ienaTlts 3r@ Cont'alnec� In �lle Confr3CLLLd� agreement entered into at the time of the sale or lease of the property . Purchasers or lessees are free to choose whe ther they wish to reside where such restrictions on amateur antennas are in effect or settle elsewhere , c3upporting Comments 1 0 . The r pa tmen t o f Defense ( DOD ) supported the ARRL and emphasized in its comments that continued success ot existing] national security and emergency preparedness telecommunications plans i nvo l v i ng amateur stations would be severely diminished it state and local ordinances were allowed to prohibit the construction and usage of effective amateur transmission facilities . DOD utilizes volunteers in the Military Affiliate Radio Service (MflkS) , [FN41 Civil '_1ir Patrol ( CAP) and the Radio Amateur Civil Emergency Service ( RncEs) It c Dints uLL that these volunteer communicators are operating radii? equipment I 1 r - 1 e)0 ( 1:ili ; R If_1�1I - 1 A II v _ II1'At,l:- '-, I installed in their homes and that undue re trli tIons on antennas by Ii)ral authorities adversely affect their efforts . DUD ist es that the responsiveness?se Volunteer systems would belmp-aired it local ordinance= in�ertere 1lt , the effectiveness of these important national telecommunication resource; . DOD Ifavors the issuance of a ruling that would set limits for local and state regulatory bodies when they are dealing with amateur s tations . Ft44 MARS is solely under the auspices of the military whic + recruits I vol anteer ana el_lr operators o re r d r ass istarlce to i t . FI he -Commission is not involved in the MARS program . 11 . Various chapters of the Amerciarr Red Cross also came forward to support the ARR[_ 's request for a preemptive ruling . The Red Cross works closely with Iamateur radio volunteers . It believes that without amateurs dedicated si-pt�ort , disaster relief operations would signific ntly sNFfer arid the its a 'lilty to serve di',aster victims would (fie hamperea . it teeis that antenna height limitations that might he imposed by local bodies will negatively affect the sery ice now rendered by the ,_ I Y e vn 1 lnt_Prs . 12 . Cities and counties from varimis parts of the United -`, tates filed comments in fltpport of the ARRL -s request for a Federal preemption ruling . The comments Ifrom the Director of Civil Defense , Port Arthur , Texas are representative : The f-lmaAeu Radio Service plays a vital role with our (jivil Defense program here in fort I rtrt�ur and the design o these antennas an. oilers lends graty to our at-, t .1 i ty to communicate during time, of disaster . IWe do not believe there should be any restrictions on the antennas and towers except for reasonable safety precautions . Tropical storms , hurricanes and tornadoes arr .1 way of life here on the Texas Gulf Coast and good communications are absolutely essential when e o mr11�e �.�! d r 1il�l ] F?-,�\iGr ,_, 4, { ,� preparing paring { _ f a hurricane and even oriel - ion_, after the h'trr icane has pa,,se I L . The Uuarter (_ent'_ti'y Viceless dssoclat inn took a strong s tano ' in favor of the - s!tance of a declaratory ruling . It believes that Federal preemption is Ir ec ,ary so that there will 111 he uniformity for all flmate'_tr radio installations en private proper ty throughout the United .states . 4 . In i t = ,orlmentg , the ARRL argued that the t,ornmission has the I_ r trisdi .,tion to preempt certain local land use re'Llstionc. whiff h I rustrate of prohibit I amateur radio communications . It safe .hat the appropriate standard in Preemption cases is not the_ extent of state and local interest in a given requ at ion , ' tt r tl-e r the poll ion is �klat �f?e�F_ � impact _ f that regulation of Federal} era is warranted whenever tOCcI gov e'rnmental regulations relate adversely to the operational aspects of amateur communication . The ARF�L maintains that localities routinely ly employ a variety one, and u^� devices to Preclude the installation of . effective amateur antennas . � luding�height restrictions , conditional use permits , Uu1 ding setbacks and dimensional limitations on antennas . [ t 'sees a declaratory ruling of Federal IL reemption as necessary to cause mu.n tt !pal i t ifs= to accommodate Beds in land LISP amateur operator planning efforts . 15 . James C . 0 ' Connell , an attorney who has represented several amateurs efore local zoning authorities said 9 J that, requiring amateurs to seek variances r special ' se a �pcov1 Q erect rea_pi abje arlterin 'l dill rec operation ofi`amateur a ions . He su.gges.tect that `th,e Iommi si inrii- te the ordinances which impose antenna height limits of less b5 pmpt zoing than b�, feet . He said li hat this hight would represent a reasonable accommodation of the communication I I II II F R 38013-n1• (' M r f`OGC ('j needs of most amateurs ar,d the legitimate concerns of local zoning authorities . Opposing Comments 16 . The City of La Flesa, California has a zoning regulation which controls amateur antennas . Its comments reflected an attempt to reach a balanced view . This - rre- ula}} on has neither h intent nor the et .ect , of Precluding or inniiting effective and reliaL> le commuj'iicatiolis . .such antennas may be built as long as their construction does not unreasonably block views f constitute eyesores . I he reasonable assumption is that there are always alternatives at a given site fo diff ren �lac.ement , and/or methods fo ae theti , treatm nt . Thus , both public objectives of controlling land use tor the public heath , safety , and convenience , and providing an effective communications network , can be satisfied . A blanket ruling to romp lets�I y set aside local control or a ruling which recognizes control only for the purpose of safety of antenna construction , would be contrary to . . . legitimate local control . 1 Comments from the ('runty o `-;an Dleq' tFate ' ll�lle we ire aware ;,f the r�enetif . provided iy amateur operators , we oppose the issuance of a preemption ruling which would elevate antenna effectiveness to a position above all other considerations . '1e must , however , acgLie that the local government must have the ability to place reasonable limitations Upon the placement and configuration of amateur radio transmitting and receiving antennas . Such ability is necessary to assure that the local decision-makers hae the authority to protect the public health , safety and welfare of all citizens . In conclusion , I would like to emphasize an important difference between your regulatory powers and that of local governments . Your Commission 's approval of rhe ; reemptive requests woulc� establish cl ' national poll H-�wever , any 'lul'ationl ado pted- a iocai ,� F Y Jul 's( lct ion cou_ � be overturned y you. or a court if such regulation was determined to be unreasonable . e City of Anderson , Indiana, summarized some of the problems that face r communities : .min sympathetic to the concerns of these antenna owners and I understand that to gain the maximum reception from their devices , optimal location is necessary . However , the preservation f f rem, dent is zoninq districts as liveable neignhornooas is jeopardized by placing these antennas in front yards of homes . Major problems of public safety have been encountered , particularly vision blockage for auto and pedestrian access . In addition , all communities are faced with various building lot sizes . Many building lots are 30 small that established setback requirements ( in order to preserve adequate air and light ) are vu nerable to the rare• ulited l rnent of these antennas . the- exercise of preemptive authority by thi ru. in granting this request would not he in the best interest of the general public . ly . The National Association of Counties ( FIACA > , the American Planning Association (r1Nn) and the National League of titles ( NLC) all opposed the issuance of an antenna preemption ruling , NACU emphasized that federal and loaat powe ot f b mea e d sal fea raoy wad awae ro u th at w eFaed rae irra it anl to 11 police poo=r exercised by tr to e aru�j unduly 1L,tk.�.rfere it ) t11e, egit} lniat � activities. of the States . I LbJLbelievedd that both rederal and l�lcal ii,teiests 1 I t r 50 FR _ : i -0 I PAGE I II can be '.nmmo -lated without preempting lcry' }: instal lat I „r of o rr , 31 ii+ Mori y to re . Ll.lt�-i t rI�, I t amateur radii, arit.erina_: The �u (i said that foe rLt, sh6uld continue to leave the issue of regulating amateur antennas with the local government and with the state and Federal. courts . IDiscussion 20 . Nher considering preemption , we must begin with two constitutional provisions . The- tenth amendment provides that any powers which the constitution either does not delegate to the United States or does not prohibit he states from exercising are reserved to the states , These are the police Dowers of the states . The Supremacy Clause , however , provides that the Iconstitution and the laws of the United States shall supersede any state law to the contrary , f- rticl , III , Section 2 Given these basic premises , state laws may De preempted- in three way=; first , Congress may expressly preempt tie state law , See Jones v . Rath Packing Co . . 4301 U .S . 519 , 525 ( 1977) . Or , I 1•r hire,= mny indicate its intent tr, completely occupy a given field so . that any `^ law oncnmpassed within that field Such ld irinuld irnpl icily h� t,ra�mpterl . Gr-• to preempt could he found in a congressional regulatory scheme that was I =:.o .- ; -asive that it would he reasonable to assume that ( ongress did not intend rr_, permit the state', to z p FI me it >ee ' 'B el i t Federal Savings t Loan ri•= , n v . de fa Cueta, 4 , 0 , i I , 153 CPI _ ) . F inal iy , prem ptrjn may be warranted when state law conflicts with federal law . Such conflicts may occur '•:h'-'ii "compliance with both Federal and state regulations is a physic I • sibil it y , ” Florida Lime & Avocado Growers , Inc . v . Paul , 373 1. 132 ,( MI) , „r when state law "stands �. � -p r a: an ohs_ tacl e to the accoI,F,I ishment , i.�/irex. Fz tor11of11t u -illli/ ur ose and 0F,'rectives of Congress :: Hines v . I r .1rInerrnore , federal regulations nave the ame pre7'rr,p` t- lve e{ ec_ t as {ederr3l st�tujte Fide ` i 3,=,ncl �s� ir_,Tl ,� . de f i lity Federal a ing, S. Loan �l. f.ue,ta. �utrra. - ' • =• i tua_tion before as requires us to determine the extent to which state ' zon„ fit < <r' ing regulations may conflict with federal policies concerning ci.r4._IF,l-1_r adio operators . zoning hatter,' coming befo 4e. u , present uch a clear ciichotomy of viewpoint as` doe_: the instant isSu_e . he ci ties , counties , ()cal communities and rousing association.,.., see An nH1 ication tr, I all of their citizens and try to address their concerns . Thins 1'=• accomplished through regulations , ordinances or c-ovenrintr• oriented toward the health , d ;et' and general welfare _ � �- of those they Ie, II_late , At the o po'= ite pole th individual amateur operators and their � t-r p I ' are �' •ur,pr rt groups who are troubled by local regulations which may inhibit the use 0 Z' ' e,_'i t ions• or , in some ,:. r:anct�s irr some - totally preclude amateur ec - nunica,. ' . (-U igned with the operators are such entities as r' Deferr,, the American Red t.ross and local trg Department I �i - ,al defenses and emergency . rgantz-i.t is tic who have found i n Amateur Radio a pool of skilled radio operators and a i- adi y available backup netwnrf . In this situation , we believe it is Ia- : !,:, '' i ,:• to strit- e a balance between the federal interest in promoting ,'Iii ■ . . ions and the lequ tirnato interest=, of local governments in ilat .I,_ _ • 1 zoning matters , The cornerstone on which we will predicate 01J- , r " i^r, . that a reasonable accommodation ma. be made between lo , Y n the two F'reernptiorl is primarily a function, of the extent of the conflict between I I I II - 1 ; HT_ Al federal and state and local regulation . Thus , in considering whether our fegulatiurls or policies can torerate a state regulation , we Islay consider such factors as the severity of the conflict and the reasons underlying the state's regulations . In this regard , we have previously recognized the legitimate an important state interests reflected in brat zoning regulations . For example in Earth Satellite Communications , Inc . . 95 FCC 2d 1223 ( 1983 ) , we recognized that . . . countervailing state interests inhere in the present situation . . . Fr e;,atnple , we do not wish to preclude-' a state or locality from exercising Jurisdiction over certain elements of an SMATV operation that properly may fall within its authority , such as zoning or public safety and health , provided th i ,—gulation in 'tuestion is not undertaken as a pretext for the actual purpose r frustrating achievement of the preeminent federal objective and so long as the non-federal regulation is applied in a nondiscriminatory manner . 24 . Similarly , we recognize here that there are certain general state and I local interests which may , in their e"r'n-handed application , legitimately affect arnatt:,ti radio facilities . Nonetheless , there is also a strong- is also federal interec t in promoting amateur communications . Evidence of this interest may b Found ' 1 the comprehensive set of rules that the Commission has adopted to regulate the ;,trriateur service . FF1151 Those rules set forth F- rc„cewe_ll'es for the licensing of stations and operators , -y fre uenc. q allocations , technical standar which amateur radio equipment must meet and operating practices which amateur operators must follow . We recognize the 1-lmateur radio service_ as a voluntary , nwl,rtirnmercial CI_,IIIIJI1IIIi at ion Service , particularly with respect to providing emergency communications . Moreover , the amateur radio service provides a rece, ':oi r of trairlew optsators , technicians and electronic experts who Can be t...:.11r-il ur1 in times of national or local emergencies . by its nature , the •if;l iteur kddio (.e ivl also provides the opportunity For Individual operators t it ther international goodwill . Upon weighing these interests , we believe a hill ted preemption policy is warranted . State and local regulations that , -rate to ! ,clelde amateur rr,minUi, tcat- Ion`= In their coI[t11tihlties are in direct , „11f 1 , 1 t. Ier,i1 objectives and ITtlict oe preempted . FU, 'i/ CFP Fart W . �` , .-locau'_•e.' am -'aLr station communications are only as effective as the I antenna-- •.r'',r. Ic . antenna height restrictions directly affect the e_•f f ec t l tte_•ss .31 ,Tina telir , of irillnl,_ at ions . `some amateur antenna configurations rl_•gli I rc i•Itirt.: substantial t n`=, t.i l l:it torts than others if they are In provide the iIlateur operator 4liiil the ,Lomme1r11,_cition`: that he/she desires to engage in . Fo' t•).. nple , an antenna array t i_,r international amateur communications will differ re,m ;;, ,ntenna used to contact other amateur operators at shorter distapices ate wit t not , however , specify any partit_u.la.r height limitation below which a I 1 t„ ,i ' 11-,'/e n,rlerlt may riot r,?']Ul ].te , nc r 111 I we '.u�- gest the. prec se Language . I ' '',1_1c,.t De COntaitiec] in luCal ordlrlcinc=eC. , _such a`� rrtecharli•3rris for '7,PCc_ l;i • ( ,Jr ions , variance; , Of conditional ,t:_e permits . Nevertheless , local • ,-' ,c' : _' tions which involve placement , screening , or height of antennas based on . . if ty , or aesthetic cons ider it ions Irlil`_.t be crafted to accommodate r. :ist,:,,iDly amateur communications , and to represent the minimum practicable Ie'-lulat ion to accomplish the local authority :. legitimate I elrp,use . tFt1bl FNr, He reiterate that our rating herein toe,= not reach i e s t r is t ive covenants" II II II I ::•. f '4`' F'E-ac,E CI I in Private contractual agreements . Such agreement.- are voluntarily r nt into by the buyer or tenant when the agreement is executed and do not+ _ rer_ usually concern this Commission . I 26 , Ubviously , we do not have the staff or financial resources to rev state and local laws review all that affect amateur operations . We are cor;fident , however . that state and local governments will endeavor to legislate in a manner. hat of f order a Peo n recognition d to the �mprnera r ai interest stake here and they a void unnecessary contlic wic tedea poic , as I well as time-consuming and expensive litigation in this area.. Hmateu-r operators who believe that local or state governments have been overreaching and thereby have precluded accomplishment of their legitimate communications I goals . may . in addition , use this document to bring our policies to the attention of local tribunals and forums . 27 . Occordinq.lyj , the Request for Declaratory Ruling led Jul 16 . . 1984 , by the Hmer ican hao io Play League . Inc . , is gr .nted to three extent ind I.ca ed I herein and . in all other respects , is denied , Federal Communications Commission , Iili i Liam J . i rrr .rcu , Secretary . 1 it !� I1,•r , .';- �- 5-.'�`+t,'-, R1 j e,_l 9-24-25 ; !3 : /15 ,gym l DIl LING CODs. 671 c-r 'I -N 50 FN 38813-01 1 END OF DOCUMENT I I • I I I I I - r 4, MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY rt DIVISION OF SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE GUIDELINES FOR DEMOLITION DEBRIS LAND DISPOSAL FACILITY PERMIT APPLICATION Note: Projects involving less than 15,000 cubic yards of demolition debris or operating less than 12 months duration do not require Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Solid Waste Disposal Permits. In eneral , g the following requirements must be met for a demolition debris land disposal facility: 1. The facility must not be open for general use. The use of the facility , shall be restricted to municipalities, organizations, or individuals having a substantial volume of nonputrescible material from demolition or construc- tion projects, including earth, rocks, stones, trees, old bituminous sur- facing, concrete, bricks, lumber, plaster, metals, glass and plastic building parts. Excluded shall be wastes from the operations of households, commercial , establishments, institutions, industrial processes, agricultural facilities and municipalities such as garbage, dead animals, paper, food and beverage containers, leaves, yard trimmings, ashes, tires, liquids, septic tank pum- pings, sludges, vehicles, machinery, appliances and hazardous wastes. Industrial wastes shall not be disposed of in a demolition debris land disposal facility unless the Director' s approval is obtained. 2. The fill and trench areas of a demolition debris land disposal facility are generally y g y prohibited within the following areas : (a) 1,000 feet from the normal high water mark on a lake, pond, or flowage. (b) 300 feet from a stream. (c) A regional flood plain (100 year flood) . (d) Wetlands. (e) Within 50 feet of the property line. (f) Within 1,000 feet of the nearest edge of the right-of-way of any state, 1 federal , or interstate highway, or of the boundary of a public park or of an occupied dwelling. Permission may be granted under this sub- section, without these distance requirements, at the discretion of the Director, taking into consideration such factors as noise, dust, litter, and other aesthetic and environmental considerations. (g) An area which is unsuitable because of reasons of topography, geology, hydrology, or soils. (h) A high water table within five feet of the lowest fill elevation. ' The above requirements may be waived by the Director provided DNR, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and local approvals for siting are obtained. The intent of these requirements is to preclude the placement of demolition material in sur- face of ground water. *5 1 I ' 1 -2- Y. y I .,71.:% -!7„ 3; :,nv : erson who maintains or operates a demolition debris land disposal -�' `•' facility site or ermits the use of p property for such shall maintain and nrerdte the site in conformance with the following practices unless other- ---7-,r--. Y Agency issuing required permit: x. .+� .e allowed by the A enc i n i ssui n the re ui red -,'-'.-- x:: -en en ourni ng shall be prohibited unless specifically approved by the , mot._ ' --ncv in a separate permit or burning of diseased trees or tree wastes 1 1 separate area of the facility is specifically approved in accor- . a7= _: - dance with Minnesota Rule pt. 7005.0810: 74...!.4-,-=' Ir :- . , um oinq of the demolition debris shall be confined to as small an area ._ :_racticaole and with appropriate facilities to confine possible ,Ind-blown material within the area At the conclusion of each day of _ :'eration, all wind-blown material resulting from the operation shall A �- - . collected and returned to the area by the own �-� Y owner or operator. _emu_ II 4_` •=`_ p ,i ) The demolition debris shall be compacted as densely as and covered with a minimum of six inches of compacted, suitableble cover material on at least a monthly basis, or as specified by the Director: All previously filled areas shall be maintained with at II YS least six inches of suitable cover material: ii ) There shall be an available supply of suitable cover material I . which, if necessary, shall be stockpiled and protected for winter operation: ' ii ) The demolition landfill shall be constructed and cover material V,,. _ graded so as to promote surface water runoff without excessive ..... erosion: (d ) Surface water drainage shall be diverted around and away from the land- fill operating area: (e) A minimum separating distance of 50 feet, or greater as specified by Ilr the Director, shall be maintained between the disposal operation and the e adjacent property line. !I (f) Effective means shall be taken, if necessay, to control rodents and vermin: II (g) Adequate dust control on the site shall be provided. (h) Equipment shall be available for adequate operation of the site. The II equipment shall be provided with adequate safety devices and adequate noise control devices: (i ) Equipment shall be provided and kept at the site during the hours of Ioperation to control accidental fires, and arrangements made with the local fire protection agency to immediately acquire their services when needed.. II II -3- I (j) Adequate communciation facilities shall be provided for emergency purposes. (k) The site shall be adequately screened by existing or provided means. , (1 ) Access to the site shall be controlled. A gate shall be at the entrance to the site and kept locked with an attendent is not on duty. ' (m) The permittee shall properly complete the Agency operational report form and submit it annually to the Agency whether or not the permitted facility is yet constructed or whether or not it is in operation until certified closed. (n) (i ) Within one month after final termination of a site, or a major ' part thereof, the area shall be covered with at least two feet of compacted earth material , graded to a minimum two percent slope to promote surface water runoff without excessive erosion. ' (ii ) The finished surface of the filled area shall be covered and main- tained with adequate topsoil and seeded to provide suitable vege- tation immediately upon completion,• or immediately in the spring on areas terminated during winter conditions. If necessary, seeded slopes shall be covered with straw or similar material to prevent erosion. , (iii ) Prior to completion of a demolition landfill site, the Agency shall be notified in order that a site investigation may be con- ducted by the Agency staff before earthmoving equipment is removed from the property. (iv) After completion of a demolition landfill site, a detailed ' description, including plat, shall be recorded with the county registar of deeds. The description shall include general types and location of wastes, depth of fill and other information of interest to future landowners. (v) If the completed site is to be cultivated, the integrity of the finished surface shall not be disturbed by agricultural cultiva- tion activities. If cultivated, a sufficient depth of cover material to allow cultivation and to support vegetation shall be maintained. ' 4. The site must be consistent with the County Solid Waste Management System Plan. Approval must be obtained, as applicable, from local , county, and II regional authorities. 5. Plans , including a permit application, engineering report and drawings, shall be prepared by a registered engineer of Minnesota. Four complete sets of the plans shall be submitted to the Agency via the regional offices. The submitted plans shall include the following: 1 -4- • ' (a) A completed permit application form. (b) An engineering report including: (i ) General information. (ii ) Site analysis, including consideration of each item in number 2 of these guidelines, surface features, type and availability of cover material and any existing refuse deposits at the site. ' (iii) Proposed operating method and procedures, including consideration of each item in numer 3 of these guidelines. (iv) Equipment to be used for operation of the site. • (v) Estimated construction time schedule. (vi ) Completion date. (vii ) Proposed frequency of cover. (viii ) Source and description of the materials that will be accepted for disposal . (ix) Statement of who will be allowed to use the site. ' 6. Drawings, folded to 82 by 11-inch size, including: (a) An Existing Conditions Plan of the area showing land use and zoning ' within 4 mile of the proposed landfill site. This plan shall show all buildings, lakes, ponds, watercourses, wetlands, sinkholes , rock outcroppings, roads , public parks, -and other applicable details and should indicate the general topography with contours and drainage pat- !! terns. An on-site bench mark shall be indicated and a north arrow drawn. A location insert map and a U.S.G.S. topographic map shall be included. The scale of the Existing Conditions Plan shall not be ' greater than 300 feet per inch. (b) A Development Plan of the site and immediately adjacent area showing dimensions, contours (contour intervals of two feet or less) , soil ' boring locations and surface elevations, and present and pinned per- tinent features including, but not limited to, roads, screening, buffer zone fencing, gate and surface water diversion and drainage. The ' Development Plan shall show the progressive development of trench and/or area fills and any phase construction. The scale of this plan shall not be greater than 200 feet per inch. 1 I 1 I Ai- -5- When determining the site development plan, consideration shall be ' given to the ultimate land use of the completed site, for example, there may be pre-planned building islands, not to be used for land- filling of demolition wastes. (c) A Cross Sections Plan, including minimum hose p 9 a nimum of two cross sections of each phase, perpendicular to one another, showing existing grade, exca- vation grade, final grade, high water table profile, profile and iden- b y of soils, and profile and identity of bedrock. (d) A Ultimate Land Use Plan showing the land use after the site is I completed, final contours (contour intervals of two feet or less) and surface water drainge. Consideration shall be given in the design of an ultimate land use plan for erosion and differential settlement. The scale of the ultimate land use plan shall not be greater than 200 feet per inch. 7. A demolition landfill shall not be opened or placed into operation until : (a) An Agency permit or letter of approval has been issued. (b) The site is consistent with the County Solid Waste Management Plan and the county or city flood plain ordinance. 8. A demolition landfill located at the site of a former dump shall not obtain ' an Agency permit until the abandoned dump has been officially closed in accordance with Minnesota Rules pt 7035.2500. 1 ItMINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY Demolition Debris Land Disposal Facility Notification Form ' To be used for projects involving less than 15,000 cub than 12 months duration. is yards or operating less ' I. Administrative A. Facility Owner and Address: I ' B. Contact Person: II Telephone Number:_ C. Facility Location (legal description) : D. Operators Name and Address: ' ( If different than Owner) ' E. County Approval and Recommendations Received: Yes No Date: II. Site Information A. Site Acreage: . B. Site Life and Capacity: 1. Amount of waste to be received cubic yards. 2. Site capacity cubic yards (including cover material ) . t 3. Proposed site life years. C. Waste Generators and Types: I D. Final Site Use (describe) : t (Note: The Landfill must not be opened for general use. The use of the landfill shall be restricted to municipalities, organizations, or individuals having a substantial volume of nonputrescible material from demolition or construction projects, including earth, rocks, stones, trees, old bituminous surfacing, concrete, bricks, lumber, plaster, metals, glass and plastic building parts. ) •re tie ilE. Locational Requirements (prohibited areas) 1 . Distance from lakes, ponds, flowages (Minimum 1 ,000 feet) II 2. Distance from a stream(s) (Minimum 300 feet) 3. Within a regional floodplain yes no (prohibited) 1 l 4. Within a wetland yes no (prohibited) 5. Setback distances (Minimum 1 ,000 feet) II Right-of-ways IIPublic parks Property line (Minimum 50 feet) I Occupied dwellings 6. Depth of water table (ground water) II(Minimum five feet) 7. Within special topographic, geologic, or hydrogeological area (prohibited-sinkholes) Describe features. II III . Operational Procedures - II A. . Equipment to be used (Describe) I II B. Waste Abilities Compaction p �) ities of Equipment (Describe) II C. Cover Procedure (include plans or sketch, as appropriate) II1. Frequency (Minimum monthly) 2. Depth of final cover (Minimum two feet) 3. Final slopes of site I(Minimum Z�, Maximum 20%) 4. Type of cover soil (describe) I D. Surface water diverted around site Yes No IV. Certification II A. The above information is true to the best of my knowledge. B. Signature Owner II Note: After completion of the demolition landfill site, a detailed description shall be recorded with the County Registrar of -Deeds. The description shall II include general types and location of wastes, depth of fill and other information of interest to future landowners. II i' Planning Commission Meeting August 26, 1987 - Page 17 IIDacy: There are soft lastic hats for P visiting construction sites . I Noziska: No, we've got to do the City Council a little better than that. How about orange blazers with our little emblem on it. Sort of brown emblem of the maple leaf. IHeadla : Is there a problem going up to people and just saying you want to look at the property? IOlsen: They know it. With this case, they specifically requested that you come there. That's one where we should have flagged. I Dacy: What about purchasing name tags for you. I know_ the Councilman have them. I Conrad: There's something to that. I was kind of saying it in jest but there is something serious about my comment too. Anything that jumps out and says we should wear something? I Emmings: I just want to know if they've got a dog. I've gone out to a lot of farm places and you can' t get out of the car. I Conrad: You will not get out of the car at a farm. That's a policy that I ' ve had. Emmings: But here, that could have been the same situation here and I'm I kind of interested in that. If I'm going to go visit somebody's house I want to know if they' ve got a dog because I 'm not going if they do. INoziska: I think it ' s a real good idea to give them a jingle. ONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS . IConrad: Barbara , what ' s your strategy in terms of. . . IDacy: I just wanted to confirm those three. Those were the ones that we recalled from recent meetings and now we're beginning to catch up on some of that stuff so we just wanted to confirm those three . IEmmings: Last week we talked about reviewing the zoning along TH 5 from the city down to TH 41. IDacy: That will be on the next agenda . Conrad: How about flag lots . Does that fit? Dacy: Part of number 3 . It doesn ' t say flag lots . lkErhart: Can you give us an analysis of this acreage left for subdivision within the MUSA line and how that relates to Met Council's calculations and I • II Planning Commission Meeting August 26, 1987 - Page 18 all that stuff so that we have a feeling for where we're at ' t after all these subdivisions come in? If I remember, there is some formula, they say you'v got so many acres left to subdivide within the MUSA line therefore in 1990 we put it here and that was based on what they anticipated to be subdivided but which we all know is about 10 times that much. This all ties into this thing . Conrad : Did we have something once upon a time on fencing? Dacy: Yes , that came up when we reviewed, what's the guys name on TH 7? The barbed wire. Conrad: Barbed wire, that's right. In fact, that was the reason I had it my notes. Fencing for barbed wire but we also hit that issue, Carver Beach we had a fence that went up close to a property line. Maybe that one was resolved. Susan Albee' s. Did that trigger anything? ' Dacy: The fence ordinance. Conrad: Okay, so then the only thing I've got in my note is really related I to the barbed wire fencing . Headla : . . .who helped formulate that fence ordinance? ' Dacy: Jo Ann and I take the first crack at it from looking at other ordinances and look at our ordinance to see what fits and then bring it to you guys . Is that what you ' re asking. Erhart: If I remember that discussion, the question was do we permit barbed wire fences in the agricultural area? To me that was the question that ' popped in my mind and then Barb and Jo Ann confirmed later that yes , our ordinance does allow the use of barbed wire in the agricultural area but not in the residential area . Olsen: The way it reads now, you couldn' t really have barbed wire residential . It says simply that ne page the Y P Y you can ' t have barbed ands . On page 9, Dacy: I think what we're going to end up doing is just creating another section called barbed wire. Olsen: And I read that as no barbed wire and we need to be a little more ' clear . Erhart : So you think it is confusing then? ' Olsen: It just says no barbed ends shall be exposed . Emmings : What section are you reading? Olsen: Section 6 ( 12) . IPlanning Commission Meeting August 26, 1987 - Page 19 Erhart : So you ' re proposing to do some changing and bring it back to us? IOlsen: Making it so barbed wire. . . Headla: You've got to be careful on that plan. That's what, single family I now? Those were all agricultural. Now that's your tax status and there's some cattle there . I Dacy: If we go by agricultural use rather than district. Noziska: What sort of a burning issue is this again? This is issue or it comes up from time. to time or why are we worried about eit?ot Dacy: It came up in the past and we've been kind of collecting all these items that you wanted to have addressed so we can look at them all together in an omnibus. IHeadla: I really think we needed something for shouldn' t be using barbed wire. g the horses too. We IWildermuth : Should not be? Headla: Should not be. IIr Wildermuth : Why? I Headla: Kids tend to go and look at horses and they can get banged up pretty bad but it's also tough on the horses too. Cattle don't jump over fences the way horses do. It's really tragic when they go through and Ithere ' s other ways to do it. Conrad: Other issues. Barbara, I guess under your third point you've got lot dimensions so when I said the flag lot, I guess that relates to a I setback at 90 feet issue. I know in the rural area we also had that concern with 180 foot width in the rural area so I think you should look at that. I I also want to be very specific in the PUD language in there because we've got 19 different opinions on what our PUD is trying to do which is real obvious. It's-obvious that the City Council has different opinions of what the PUD ordinance is all about so I guess from a planning standpoint I would like to I see you two draft it. In terms of philosophical we'll break it down to our talk but I think you two probably lingo know nthe then posture that we had when we went through the Lake Ssan South and I want to make it real clear what constitutes a PUD. IErhart : We don ' t have an intent section? IConrad: I thought we did but it's obviously not good enough because City Council had five different views of that as a PUD and it clearly is not a PUD. It clearly is not. I[_ Emmings : We were pretty unified . I 1 Planning Commission Meeting \ugust 26, 1987 - Page 20 Wildermuth: What happened with that? Dacy: What happened is the Attorney is drafting a PUD concept agreement ' document that's outlining the items that he has to adhere to and conform to. It gives us the power as each phase, as each plat comes in, just because we looked at that plan that said there were 411 single family lots in concept. ' When they resubmit, things have to meet ordinance requirements and we have to look at the individual plans so they may not get the 411 lots. At any rate, the intent of the agreement was to outline all that was discussed . . . ' Conrad: I think through the procees they gave Chanhassen more things than they started out so I'm not really negative on how it turned out. It just seemed like such a simple case, in the very beginning it was not a PUD and I it seemed like a lot of work for nothing but in terms of what was done but there was very little creativity and the zoning was all there. To create the densities, it really didn't need a PUD status but I think staff and certain council members did a nice job and were able to negotiate some things and it will probably be a pretty good development. Erhart: I take it you don't want to discuss these things tonight. You just, want to list them? Conrad : I just want to list them and get staff working on them and ' hopefully they can come back and we can take a crack at what they have. Headla: Can we take a variation on that last one. On cul-de-sacs. Snowplowing. I would like to hear what our maintenance people say. Is there an optimum diameter and should we take the position. To my knowledge, to make a decision we're in a lot of trouble. I think if we can find a way to do it , let them give a recommendation on it. ' Emmings: Should we at the same time look at, what are we going to do in terms of requiring vegetation on them and so forth so we don ' t wind up with a bunch of just ugly ones . Wildermuth: Is it in the pervue of the ,Commission to look at building codes, like the wooden chimney, wooden foundations? Conrad : Isn ' t Bill Boyt heading that up? Dacy: Boyt and the Mayor and Howie was going to be notified . Noziska : I haven ' t been contacted . Conrad : We want you on that. Your name is frequently mentioned. Y If it's Bill in charge, I know he's been wanting to talk to Howie but he really does need your insight. He's hitting some dead-ends real fast and he's tempted to drop it and I guess maybe that ' s unfair of me too. Noziska: One other thing too, I'm sitting here recalling the great big ' burnable barn that we approved in the back of our main street. I really 1 IIPlanning Commission Meeting August 26, 1987 - Page 21 IC think some thought ought to be given to either fire resistant construction of multi-family dwellings or some sort of compartmentilization. Either I within 5,000 square feet or 10,000 or something for fire walls. Fire resistant fire walls. We're sitting in a volunteer fire department with part time people. I just feel a little uneasy by having these great big I buildings. Look at our industrial park, most of that stuff is in pretty good shape. Conrad: What they're hearing right now, and maybe you know more than I do, Ibut they're hearing right now that the State does not look real positively on the City upgrading the building codes. Is that a fair assessment? Have you two heard that? Making it more restrictive and that's the feedback so I far saying, it's negative and that there would be a real hesitation to start looking at that simply because the state has to approve it. INoziska : No , the State doesn ' t have to . Conrad: Maybe I'm misinterpretting but maybe t' I change our building code. Everybody adopts what is itt the rState oUnified o Building Code. Noziska: It's the Uniformed Building Code but it's adopted by the State as I in minimum requirement code. That's UBC. It's put together by ICBM. International Conference of Building Mangers and as far as that code goes, just about anything goes and any of these special interest groups have a lot Indians and it doesn't matter who it is. I think rather than them be ' nebuously. being led down the primrose path without direction, we should say, is that what we want for Chanhassen? If we do fine. If we don't, then let's change it. I'm serious about this fire thing and I do think our I experience with these wooden chimneys surrounding tin have pretty much proven themselves to be acceptable to the fire department. I think approving that great big tin mess that we're more or less going to saddle I Chaska with, Brown's deal. I think that's a mistake too. I don't think that improves the village of Chanhassen one little bit and if we do anything, I think we should take the tact, look where Eden Prairie is. Eden IPrairie requires quality buildings. They don't let just any old shack be built. You let a developer build a shack, he ' s going to build a shack . Dacy: Another item that we could amend, the zoning ordinance could prohibit I metal buildings in certain areas. That's an option. I know Chaska has a requirement and Eden Prairie require 75% of the exterior in wood and I don't think we should go that far in the design since we don't have any design qualified staff, architects . Simply prohibiting metal buildings would . . . IConrad : A lot of these issues Howie, I talked to Tom Hamilton about talked to Bill Boyt and we really would like you to and I y participate in that I group. The reason I'm bringing it up right now is, the concern that I have is that whether it was a building inspector or whoever, who called the State, there was a real sense of let's not do this so I think I need your involvement on that Howie. I- I 1 C C Planning Commission Meeting II _August 26, 1987 - Page 22 r Noziska: I'll be happy to get a hold of Bill. Also, Bloomington. There's another example. Bloomington has corridors where they have stricter design requirements and I think there was for a time, this great big thought about us presenting a negative image in Chanhassen and we should do something. Well , if we're ever going to do something about it we're going to have to take some steps. I also know in Bloomington an issue doesn't get to the I City Council before the Planning Commission likes it and then by the time the Planning Commission is through with it, that it's pretty much a rubber stamp for City Council. Not all issues but 80% of them as opposed to the way we run things, We sort of run things, we go our way, they go their's I and their's is a political decision and ours is sometimes a planning decision and sometimes not but. there isn't that same sort of mesh. I think we can learn from these other communities. Eden Prairie is just an example community to work with I think and they are just ahead of us Dr we're just behind them in the development. Conrad: Street size. Is that in zoning? Where's our street size? Is that' in the subdivision ordinance? We were talking about we had concerns with how wide we were forcing people to build street and the quality of the streets in some of our three lot splits . I Dacy: I thought we had put that issues to rest . Conrad: Did we? I I � Emmings : I couldn' t tell you what they are but I think we did something on them. Conrad : Has that gone through? Have we changed the ordinance? Dacy: As to the rural and the private drives, at the meeting we discussed I how many lots could be served by a public road and what the ordinance provides now is a gravel roadway to city specifications in the rural area. Anything over four lots has to be upgraded but yes , we went through all that. Headla: How long does it take to change an ordinance like the beachlot I definition? Dacy: I thought we just did that . I Headla: The question is how long does it take to change it. Dacy: It depends on the issue. With beachlots it's going to be a little I longer. Headla: Here's the point I wanted to bring up. We' g P• ve got a definition right now and it's quite favorable for people to put in a beachlot. There are other people that can be looking at a beachlot and can say I guess in 5 years I'm going to do that. However, in a little while people say, we're I getting too many beachlots. Wham, cut off from putting in anymore I I 1 Planning Commission Meeting August 26, 1987 - Page 23 fr i beachlots. That is not right. What I would like to see, if we're going to have a position on beachlots, that position should be valid and if we decide I to change it fine but the change can't be incorporated for a finite number of years. Am I clear in what I'm saying. It's clear in my own mind but am I getting my point across? IDacy: The Council, as a policy can not predetermine what a future Council may or may not do as far as an ordinance change. If you're saying that the current ordinance is too permissive. IHeadla: No, I'm not saying that at all. I'm saying I being made right now based on -that ordinance and it's aprobably dac very ngoode ordinance. I have no qualms about it but a lot of people are looking at that and saying in 10 years I think that's what we ought to do and in 5 years , maybe 3 years the Council is going to change that and it seems like I they shouldn't be able to change that for, I don't know 1 year, 2 years or whatever . I Emmings: Why? Why do you want to restrict yourself? Don't you want to retain all the flexibility you can to change anything as more information comes to light? Why do you want to tie yourself down? I Headla: Because people are making decisions . Emmings: Except when they decided to apply for something they have to deal ' with the ordinance as it exists at the time they apply I wait 10 years , they have to take the risk that heordinan if ordinance will be thee to same in 10 years. If they want to get in on the present ordinance they have to apply now. We don't want to put ourselves in the position where we say I now we've passed an ordinance and say, we are not going to change this for 10 years because it ' s not fair to people. That makes no sense to me at all . I Erhart: Ladd, that's what I called you about that one time. We were talking about beachlots that one night. If your concerned about getting too many beachlots on the lake what you do is establish how many beachlots or I how many foot of beachlot area you can have relative to the number of square feet of water on the lake and set a limit by the size of the lake and when that much lot is on the lake, that's the end of it. That's a way of regulating the amount of beachlots on a recreational lake. IWildermuth : Until the Council changes the parameters . II Erhart: I said I think they ' re great and then you started turning red . Conrad: That's right I was irritated. I thought you were your trails. I got a lot of comments on your trail system talking about IErhart : Anyway, that was an idea . IHeadla: The property just north of my place they're going to be coming up pretty quick and they've got intentions to do that and look at all the L I Planning Commission Meeting August 26 , 1987 - Page 24 �. other places that can be developed. What's going to happen? Is there going to be a flood of them coming in for the beachlots? Emmings : We looked at that one for a beachlot once already. Headla: It 's coming in again. ' Emmings: They didn't have enough area or frontage or something. I'm thinking of the one that came in just a little while ago and we said just till forget it. Emmings moved, Conrad seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in .favor II and motion carried. The meeting was adjourned at 9: 20 p.m. . Submitted by Barbara Dacy City Planner Prepared by Nann Opheim ' • 1 1 . 1 1 &' I a2® - i40, A B C D E F 1 � g g g t q g g i � g_ y 9 ° g _ s flit e € I t ; i-7-=----- _.47--1- �s ' - rin . ,. •l'- \ - ,;■ ' f : �- 1, * - : \�__� te .„.:4_'r •j.+- _ . ,' - rfr --< i 4... . ,,, -- : ■ Ai - , - = i.. n4 - _ r , +,l j V s, I gyti, � Wow . • � 4,,,;44.. ... . Il ,' f‘-�• 'er.� �! ■ '� t %--- I� is : ... �'r a/fr A qI ` _ . ,, Qq ,w iL►• t+ A , (/1 ' y Oa 3k'.;,,.. _,;. s. ,,,.4„._:_;:t. .ll c .A e . ,. Air".. • Ird: * . . W . LAN,LIM ) , -, .1 _. 1 ---- tits ...• 1 Ira �4=. t ryy 1 w m AIME . linklillill" I • ° 2 sue.c' , �. __ C> 1 ,9' '`COL -�>' �., jt� _;�,•�� , i _ -- , r 6 �t! F. LL_ V " -11 I lk I I I ! -7 1 1 L'1 -74 S ° _� —s -T------ i _ Ir-_ r �� g g g1 � ► 11 1 I i ; 1 -=, ...._____-7(:1 \-----4--3 ww \ I [� '.J I I 3i.9f 111 CITY OF �% —__ 4 CHANHASSDV / ' 1 1 I 1 �} 1 BASE MAP _.. �3: uf[ wr Depriirs ...____, ; .1; f r Y :II j I ets-n -► = -� w I ; ��CFtAAF44SSf7V ENGINEERING DEPT. 7•'.s4._ . 1,' , -' '`�,4 - 1-T� -- RtnKS +ALL.fen L J "\yam. ./ i�'I 'Z! 7 y - , _-_w 6 p-,4-. ,, .. , I / ti= r ia - I �_ IV �\ -- ;; t 1 1 0 1 1 i I g I i t p I t I i >( I 11 1 1 1 1 I I - I I. A. //,////myrlit:74-/ I 1 Subdivision 13 . Architectural Standards . a) The architectural review conducted under a site and building I 3 plan review is not intended to restrict design freedom unduly. However, it is in the best interest of the city to promote high standards of architectural design and com- ' patibility with surrounding structures and neighborhoods . Architectural plans shall be prepared by an architect or other qualified person acceptable to the director of plan- ' ping and shall show the following: 1) elevations of all sides of the buAI ilding; I 2) type and color of exterior building materials; 3) a typical floor plan; ' 1 4) dimensions of all structures; and 1 ______5) the location of trash containers and of heating, , ventilation and air conditioning equipment. b) + Unadorned prestressed concrete panels , concrete block and I I unfinished metal shall not be permitted as exterior mate- rials for residential or non-residential buildings . This E restriction shall apply to all principal structures and to I all accessory buildings except those accessory buildings not visible from any exterior property line. The city may, at i. its discretion, allow architecturally enhanced block or I Concrete panels . c) All rooftop or ground mounted mechanical equipment and exterior trash storage areas shall be enclosed with mate- I ill rials compatible with the principal structure. Low profile , self-contained mechanical units which blend in with the building architecture are exempt from the screening require- ' merit. d) Underground utilities shall be provided for all new and I substantially renovated structures . Subdivision 14 . Landscape Plan Requirements. Landscape plans shall be prepared by a landscape architect or other qualified I person acceptable to the director of planning, drawn to a scale of not less than one inch equals 50 feet and shall show the following: I a) boundary lines of the property with accurate dimensions ; b) locations of existing and proposed buildings , parking lots , I roads and other improvements; c) proposed grading plan with two foot contour intervals ; I 3 1 107 ' 1 0\7 / § 11.03 stored within a completely enclosed building within all Commercial Districts, and within the confines of screening as required by the performance standards of this Chapter. Merchandise which is offered for sale as described heretofore ' may be displayed beyond the confines of a building in any Commercial District, but the area occupied by such outdoor display shall not constitute a greater number of square feet than 10% of the ground floor area of the building housing principal use. No storage or display of any type shall be ' permitted within the one-half of the required front or side street setback nearest the street nor within any required interior side or rear setback. Source: Ordinance No. 82-18 Effective Date: 9-17-82 K. Designs. All sites and structures within all Districts except the Rural, R1-44, R1-22, R1-13.5, R1-9.5 ' and RM 6.5 shall be developed in accordance with plans and specifications prepared by a registered professional landscape or building architect respectively. Exterior building finishes in these Districts shall consist of materials comparable in grade and quality to the following: (1) face ' 1 brick; (2) natural stone; (3) specially designed precast concrete units if the surfaces have been integrally treated with an applied decorative material or texture; and, (4) factory fabricated and finished metal framed panel construction, if the panel materials be any of those named above, glass, prefinished metal (other than unpainted galvanized iron), or plastic. Wood trim shall not constitute more than 25% of the building's exterior. ' Source: Ordinance No. 72-84 ----- Effective Date: 4-5-84 Subd. 4. Performance Standards. Uses which because of the nature of their operation are accompanied by an excess of noise, vibration, dust, dirt, smoke, odor, noxious gases, glare or wastes shall not be permitted. These standards shall be considered "excessive" when they either exceed or deviate from the limitations set forth in the following performance Ispecifications: Source: Ordinance No. 82-18 Effective Date: 9-17-82 ' A. Noise. Noise shall be measured on any property line of the tract on which the operation is located. Noise shall be muffled so as not to become objectionable due to intermittence, beat frequency, shrillness or intensity. ' The sound pressure level shall be measured with a sound level meter and on an associated octave band analyzer, both of which 1 are manufacture': according to current specifications 300 (4-30-84) `! EZIfier 1212or 1 . + Minne sota Pollution Control Agency , DATE: ` \ l '3 ) TO: �CC3 \ZO Qc c. CUv..\' FROM: \ \_' O PHONE: act ,, ._ c5C ADDRESS: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Solid and Hazardous Waste Division Hazardous Waste Section 520 Lafayette Road St. Paul , Minnesota 55155 SUBJECT: E- FOR: INFORMATION REVIEW AND COMMENT APPROVAL ' AS YOU REQUESTED Svc L-e c --c G �St � 4)Q)cyzK. � ..ecc�e c.\ B=Wir i:::::::11iiirm• I I 2.1.4 Extraction Procedure Toxicity Introduction The Extraction Procedure (EP) is designed to simulate the leaching a waste will undergo if disposed of in a sanitary landfill. This test is designed to simulate leaching that takes place in a sanitary landfill only. It is a laboratory test in which a representative sample of a waste is extracted with distilled water maintained at a pH of 5 using acetic acid. The extract obtained from the EP (the "EP Extract") is then analyzed to ' determine if any of the thresholds established for the eight elements (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, selenium, silver), four pesticides (Endrin, Lindane, Methoxychlor, Toxaphene), and two herbicides ' (2,4,5-trichlorophenoxypropionic acid, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) have been exceeded. If the EP Extract contains any one of the above substances in an amount equal to or exceeding the levels specified in 40 CFR 261.24, the waste possesses the characteristic of Extraction Procedure Toxicity and is a ' hazardous waste. Summary of Procedure The Extraction Procedure consists of five steps (refer to Figure 1): 1. Separation Procedure A waste containing unbound liquid is filtered and if the solid phase is less than 0.5% of the waste, the solid phase is discarded and the filtrate analyzed for trace elements, pesticides, and herbicides (step 5). If the waste contains more than 0.5% solids, the solid phase ' is extracted and the liquid phase stored for later use. 2. Structural Integrity Procedure/Particle Size Reduction Prior to extraction, the solid material must pass through a 9.5-mm (0.375-in ) standard sieve, have a surface area per gram of waste of 3.1 cm', or, if it consists of a single piece, be subjected to the 1 Structural Integrity Procedure. The Structural Integrity Procedure is used to demonstrate the ability of the waste to remain intact after disposal. If the waste does not meet one of these conditions it must be ground to pass the 9.5-mm sieve. 3. Extraction of Solid Material ' - The solid material from step 2 is extracted for 24 hr in an aqueous medium whose pH is maintained at or below 5 using 0.5 N acetic acid. The pH is maintained either automatically or manually. (In ' acidifying to pH 5., no more than 4.0 g of acid solution per g of material being extracted may be used. ) I 1 -1 - I i 2 / CHARACTERISTICS - EP Toxicity I IWet Waste Sample Representative Contains<0.5% Waste Sample Wet Waste Sample Nonfilterable > 100 Grams Contains>0.5% ISolids olids terable Solids Ilv .l Dry Waste Sample i Liquid Solid I Separation Solid Liquid Solid r Separation 1 Discard Liquid Particle Size Liquid 1 >9.5mm < 9.5mm Monolithic I L-- Sample Size Structural I Reduction Integrity Procedure 1 1 r Store at 4°C I Extraction of Solid Waste 4 at pH =2 4, ISolid Liquid Solid Separation 1 1 Discard I Liquid NI I EP Extract 4, I Analysis Methods • . 1 I Figure 1. Extraction Procedure Flowchart. -2- 1 Ir Introduction; Regulatory Definition / 3 1 4. Final Separation of the Extraction from the Remaining Solid After extraction, the liquid:solid ratio is adjusted to 20:1 and 1 the mixed solid and extraction liquid are separated by filtration. the solid is discarded and the liquid combined with any filtrate obtained in step 1. This is the EP Extract that is analyzed and compared to the threshold listed in Table 1 of 40 CFR 261.24. 1 5. Testing (Analysis) of EP Extract Inorganic and organic species are identified and quantified using the appropriate methods in the 7000 and 8000 series of methods in this manual. Regulatory Definition 1 A solid waste exhibits the characteristic of EP toxicity if, using the appropriate test methods described in this manual or equivalent methods approved by the Administrator under the procedures set forth in 40 CFR 260.20 ' and 260.21, the extract from a representative sample of the waste contains any of the contaminants listed in Table 1 at a concentration equal to or greater than the respective value given in that Table. If a waste contains less than 0.5% filterable solids, the waste itself, after filtering, is 1 considered to be the extract for the purposes of analysis. A solid waste that exhibits the characteristic of EP toxicity, but is 1 not listed as a hazardous waste in Subpart D, is assigned EPA Hazardous Waste Numbers that correspond to the toxic contaminants causing it to be hazardous. These numbers are specified in Table 1. 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 -3- 1 , 1 4 / CHARACTERISTICS - EP Toxicity ( I TABLE 1. MAXIMUM CONCENTRATION OF CONTAMINANTS FOR CHARACTERISTIC OF EP TOXICITY II EPA Maximum I Hazardous-Waste concentration Number Contaminant (mg/1) I , 0004 Arsenic 5.0 D005 Barium 100.0 II 0006 Cadmium 1.0 I D007 Chromium 5.0 D008 Lead -5.0 I D009 Mercury 0.2 0010 Selenium 1.0 D011 Silver 5.0 II D012 E nd in (1,2,3,4,10,10- ex c loro-1 0.02 2 7-epoxy-1,4,4a,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydro-1 I 4-endo, endo-5,8-dimethanonaph- thalene) 0013 Lindane (1,2,3,4,5,6- 0.4 II Hexachlorocyclohexane, gamma isomer D014 Methoxychlor (1,1,1-Trichloro-2,2-bis 10.0 II(p-methoxyphenyl )ethane) D015 Toxaphene (C 1010C18, Technical 0.5 chlorinated camphene, 67-69% II chlorine) D016 2,4-0 (2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) 10.0 II 0017 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) (2,4,5- 1.0 Trichlorophenoxypropionic acid) II I -4- I r ; METHOD 1310 EXTRACTION PROCEDURE (EP) TOXICITY TEST METHOD AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST 1.0 Scope and Application 1.1 The extraction procedure (EP) described in this method is designed to simulate the leaching a waste will undergo if disposed of in an improperly ' designed sanitary landfill. Method 1310 is applicable to liquid, solid, and multiphasic samples. 2.0 Summary of Method ' 2.1 If a representative sample of the waste contains more than 0.5% solids, the solid phase of the sample is extracted with deionized water which is maintained at a pH of 5 + 0.2 using acetic acid. The extract is analyzed to determine if any of the threshold. limits listed in Table 1 are exceeded. ' Table 1 also specifies the approved method of analysis. Wastes that contain less than 0.5% solids are not subjected to extraction, but are directly analyzed and evaluated in a manner identical to that of extracts. 3.0 Interferences ' 3.1 Potential interferences that may be encountered during analysis are discussed in the individual analytical methods referenced in Table 1. 4.0 Apparatus and Materials ' 4.1 Extractor: For purposes of this test, an acceptable extractor is one that will impart sufficient agitation to the mixture to (1) prevent stratification of the sample and extraction fluid and (2) ensure that all sample surfaces are continuously brought into contact with well-mixed extrac- tion tion fluid. Examples of suitable extractors are shown in Figures 1-3 of this method and Section 2.2 (Mobility) of this manual and are available from Associated Designs & Manufacturing Co. , Alexandria, Virginia; Glas-Col ' Apparatus Co. , Terre Haute, Indiana; Millipore, Bedford, Massachusetts ; and Rexnard, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. ' 4.2 pH Meter or pH Controller (Chemtrix, Inc. , Hillsboro, Oregon is a possible source of a pH controller). 4.3 Filter holder: A filter holder capable of supporting a 0.45-µ ' filter membrane and able to withstand the pressure needed to accomplish separation. Suitable filter holders range from simple vacuum units to relatively complex systems that can exert up to 5.3 kg/cm (75 psi ) of pressure. The type of filter holder used depends upon the properties of the mixture to be filtered. Filter holders known to EPA and deemed suitable for use are listed in Table 2. Revised 4/84 -5- 1310 / 2 II TABLE 1. MAXIMUM CONCENTRATION OF CONTAMINANTS FOR CHARACTERISTIC OF EP TOXICITY Maximum concentration Analytical Contaminant (mg/1 ) method Arsenic 5.0 7060, 7061 II Barium 100.0 7080, 7081 1 Cadmium 1.0 7130, 7131 Total Chromium 5.0 7190, 7191 II Hexavalent Chromium 5.0 7195, 7196, 7197 II Lead 5.0 7420, 7421 Mercury 0.2 7470 II Selenium 1.0 7740, 7741 Silver 5.0 I 7760, 7761 Endrin (1,2,3,4,10,10-Hexachloro-1 0.02 8080 (' 7-epoxy-1,4,4a,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydro-1 4-endo, endo-5,8-dimethanonaph- thalene) I Lindane (1,2,3,4,5,6- 0.4 8080 Hexachlorocyclohexane, gamma isomer) Methoxychlor (1,1,1-Trichloro-2,2-bis 10.0 8080 II (p-methoxyphenyl )ethane) Toxaphene (C10H10C18, Technical 0.5 8080 II chlorinated camphene, 67-69% chlorine) 1 2,4-0 (2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) 10.0 8150 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) (2,4,5- 1.0 8150 1 Trichlorophenoxypropionic acid) 1 \_ -6- II C 1 1310 / 3 I I I J i fo--„,..7.._. .251 5.0 1 . MI • • C== =4 i , •9 .0 • /r 4.0 j • • I V i I , pp, 1 4 L . _ INon-Clogging Supoort Bushing 1 Inch Blade at 30° to Horizontal I IFigure 1. Extractor. I I I I -7- 1 • 2--Liter Plastic or Glass Bottles w 0 1/16–Horsepower Electric Motor 4=. 29 RPM 4 ■/#N . •1-1--- (113 , I.r 11 ! H4.?ci---11 . ,r -_-) • --.li 1r • 1 _____ .......^''i.I •■•••■••g ......-.1.1.-....■■-•-•.•..........- II • ..• 1:1-0 . --` I n . .1. . i _ cl 2 L.) .") ..") ,_._ .c.2 _ ____ ..s.... a- __--i-f-:_-_-1_,_ -__ ___ I r. 1 i co Li_l I Screws for Holding Bottles Al 1 - - - - -— a,;4:4 • Figure 2. Rotary Extractor. Mill MIN MI 1/1 OM MO MN IMI all MN IIN INE Mill OM 1.0 MI MN NON OM 1-Gallon Plastic or Glass Bottle ∎ Itmgerl Cover Foam Bonded to Cover L._....._____ 1 1� 1 Box Assembly Plywood Construction lit‘ . t ,�.J_--� I 1 I I t i t I � ' I + i'! Oh \l Totall Enclosed . I . 1 1 y I ' ' Fan Cooled Motor ' � l ; 1 ( IQ 1/: I I S t 1 Foam Inner Liner 1 ) 111 I . i _411/40 rpm. 1/8 NP 1 ,D 1 5 I ( *rte''G rr%f�ilFr N_K li „Pwl a lig , lb ',6 ` i0111 ` 3 Position Toggle Switch G., Fuse 0 cr, 12 In Figure 3. FPRl extractor. 1310 / 6 I 4.4 Filter membrane: Filter membrane suitable for conducting the required filtration shall be fabricated from a material which: (1) is not ', physically changed by the waste material to be filtered, and (2) does not absorb or leach the chemical species for which a waste's EP Extract will be analyzed. Table 3 lists filter media known to the agency and generally found to be suitable for solid waste testing. 4.4.1 In cases of doubt, contact the filter manufacturer to determine if the membrane or the prefilter are adversely affected by the particular waste. If no information is available, submerge the filter in the waste's liquid phase. After 48 hr, a filter that undergoes visible physical change (i .e. , curls, dissolves, shrinks, or swells) is unsuitable for use. 1 TABLE 2. EPA-APPROVED FILTER HOLDERS Manufacturer Size Model No. Comments ' Vacuum Filters Nalgene 500 ml 44-0045 Disposable plastic unit, ' includes prefilter and filter pads, and reservoir; should be used when ' f solution is to be analyzed for inorganic constituents Nuclepore 47 mm 410400 ' Millipore 47 mm XX10 047 00 Pressure Filters Nuclepore 142 mm 425900 1 Micro Filtration 142 mm 302300 Systems Millipore 142 mm YT30 142 HW 1 1 -10- i I1310 / 7 , IITABLE 3. EPA-APPROVED FILTRATION MEDIA I Filter to be used Filter to be used or aqueous systems for organic systems ICoarse Prefilter - Gelman 61631, 61635 61631, 61635 INuclepore 210907, 211707 210907, 211707 Millipore AP25 035 00, AP25 035 00, IIAP25 127 50 AP25 127 50 Medium prefilters INuclepore 210905, 211705 210905, 211705 I Millipore AP20 035 00, AP20 035 00, AP20 124 50 AP20 124 50 IFine prefilters Gelman 64798, 64803 64798, 64803 INuclepore 210903, 211703 210903, 211703 Millipore AP15 035 00, AP15 035 00, I AP15 124 50 AP15 124 50 IFine filters (0.45 pm) Gelman 60173, 60177 60540 or 66149, I60544 or 66151 Pall NX04750, NX14225 INuclepore 142218 142218a Millipore HAWP 047 00, FHUP 047 00, IHAWP 142 50 FHLP 142 50 Selas 83485-02, 83485-02, I 83486-02 83486-02 aSusceptible to decomposition by certain polar organic solvents. II II -1 1 - I i't' 1310 / 8 4.4.2.1 Prepare a standard solution of the chemical species of interest. 4.4.2.2 Analyze the standard for its concentration of the chemical species. 1 4.4.2.3 Filter the standard and re-analyze. If the concen- tration of the filtrate differs from the original standard, the filter membrane leaches or absorbs one or more of the chemical species. 4.5 Structural integrity tester: Having a 3.18-cm (1.25-in. ) diameter 1 hammer weighing 0.33 kg (0.73 lb) and having a free fall of 15.24 cm (6 in.) shall be used. This device is available from Associated Design and Manufac- turing Company, Alexandria, VA 22314, as Part No. 125, or it may be fabri- cated to meet the specifications shown in Figure 4. 5.0 Reagents 5.1 Deionized water: Water should be monitored for impurities. 5.2 0.5 N acetic acid: This can be made by diluting concentrated glacial acetic acid (17.5 N). The glacial acetic acid should be of high purity and monitored for impurities. 1 5.3 Analytical standards should be prepared according to the analytical methods referenced in Table 1. 6.0 Sample Collection, Preservation and Handling 6.1 All samples must be collected using a sampling plan that addresses the considerations discussed in Section One of this manual . 6.2 Preservatives must not be added to samples. 1 6.3 Samples can be refrigerated if it is determined that refrigeration will not affect the integrity of the sample. 7.0 Procedure 1 7.1 If the waste does not contain any free liquid, go to Section 7.9. If the sample is liquid or multiphase, continue as follows. Weigh filter membrane and prefilter to +0.01 g. Handle membrane and prefilters with blunt curved-tip forceps of vacuum tweezers, or by applying suction with a pipette. . i . 1 -12- I1310 / 9 I Ilb • 1 I tl 1I i�� Combined I �' t� r Weignt `(. .33 kg.(.73 lb! i 1 �: I � � Ili 1 t I II. ' � l !d (3.75 cm) tiq � �, , , i 1 ; 1 I; 11.15.25 an �' 11;17'4 l6") Sample j i I !'4 r Elastomeric + S/ a. eoicer• f• -4--7-::- � T / / ____ �1�- A = -1:, A•r ..-...,. 4 ., 1 7.1 crn �. 3:T ,:7 � . a'. . (2.8") •�I ! � •,. — _j III 111 ' ' 11.3"1 1 (3.7") ■ ' Elastomeric sample holder fabricated of material firm enough to support the sample. I IFigure 4. Compaction tester. -1 3- 4, 1310 / 10 1 7.2 Assemble filter holder, membranes, and prefilters following the manufacturer's instructions. Place the 0.45-pm membrane on the support screen and add prefilters in ascending order of pore size. Do not prewet filter membrane. 7.3 Weigh out a representative subsample of the waste (100 g minimum). 7.4 Allow slurries to stand to permit the solid phase to settle. I Wastes that settle slowly may be centrifuged prior to filtration. 7.5 Wet the filter with a small portion of the waste's or extraction mixture's liquid phase. Transfer the remaining material to the filter holder and apply vacuum or gentle pressure (10-15 psi ) until all liquid passes through the filter. Stop filtration when air or pressurizing gas moves through the membrane. If this point is not reached under vacuum or gentle pressure, slowly increase the pressure in 10-psi increments to 75 psi. Halt filtration when liquid flow stops. This liquid will constitute part or all of the extract (refer to Section 7.16). The liquid should be refrigerated until time of analysis. NOTE: Oil samples or samples which contain oil are treated in exactly the same way as any other sample. The liquid portion of the sample is filtered and treated as part of the EP extract. If the liquid portion of the sample will not filter (this is usually the case with heavy oils or greases) it is carried through the EP extraction as a solid. 7.6 Remove the solid phase and filter media and, while not allowing it to dry, weight to +0.01 g. The wet weight of the residue is determined by calculating the weight difference between the weight of the filters (Section 7.1) and the weight of the solid phase and the filter media. 7.7 The waste will be handled differently from this point on depending , on whether it contains more of less than 0.5% solids. If the sample appears to have less than 0.5% solids, the percent solids will be determined by the following procedure. 7.7.1 Dry the filter and residue at 80. C until two successive weighings yield the same value. , 7.7.2 Calculate the percent solids using the following equation: weight of filtered _ tared weight solid and filters of filters x 100 = % solids initial weight of waste material NOTE: This procedure is only used to determine whether the solid must be extracted or whether it can be discarded unextracted. It II Revised 4/84 , I -14- C 1310 / 11 is not used in calculating the amount of water or acid to use in the extraction step. Do not extract solid material that has been dried at 80' C. A new sample will have to be used for extraction if a percent solids determination is performed. 7.8 If the solid comprises less than 0.5% of the waste, discard the solid and proceed immediately to Section 7.17, treating the liquid phase as the extract. 7.9 The solid material obtained from Section 7.5 and all materials that do not contain free liquids should be evaluated for particle size. If the ' solid material has a surface area per gram of material equal to or greater than 3.1 cm or passes through a 9.5-mm (0.375-in. ) standard sieve, the operator should proceed to Section 7.11. If the surface area is smaller or the particle size larger than specified above, the solid material would be prepared for extraction by crushing, cutting or grinding the material so that it passes through a 9.5-mm (0.375-in. ) sieve or, if the material is in a single piece, by subjecting the material to the "Structural Integrity Procedure" described in Section 7.10. 7.10 Structural Integrity Procedure (SIP) : 7.10.1 Cut a 3.3-cm-diameter by 7.1-cm-long cylinder from the waste material . For wastes that have been treated using a fixation process, the waste may be cast in the form of a cylinder and allowed to cure for 30 days prior to testing. ' 7.10.2 Place waste into sample holder and assemble the tester. Raise the hammer to its maximum height and drop. Repeat 14 additional times. ' 7.10.3 Remove solid material from tester and scrape off any particles adhering to sample holder. Weigh the waste to the nearest 0.01 g and transfer it to the Extractor. 7.11 If the sample contains more than 0.5% solids, use the wet weight of the solid phase obtained in Section 7.6 for purposes of calculating the ' amount of liquid and acid to employ for extraction by using the following equation: W = Wf - Wt where: W = wet weight in grams of solid to be charged to extractor Wf = wet weight in grams of filtered solids and filter media Wt'= weight in grams of tared filters. 1 I -15- C 1310 / 12 If the waste does not contain any free liquids, 100 g of the material will be subjected to the extraction procedure. ' 7.12 Place the appropriate amount of material (refer to Section 7.11) into the extractor and add 16 times its weight of deionized water. 7.13 After the solid material and deionized water are placed in the extractor, the operator should begin agitation and measure the pH of the solution in the extractor. If the pH is greater than 5.0, the pH of the solution should be decreased to 5.0 + 0.2 by adding 0.5 N acetic acid. If the pH is equal to or less than 5.0, no acetic acid should be added. The pH of the solution should be monitored, as described below, during the course of the extraction and, if the pH rises above 5.2, 0.5 N acetic acid should be added to bring the pH down to 5.0 + 0.2. However, in no event shall the aggregate amount of acid added to the solution exceed 4 ml of acid per gram of solid. The mixture should be agitated for 24 hr and maintained at 20'-40' C (68'-104' F) during this time. It is recommended that the operator monitor and adjust the pH during the course of the extraction with a device such as the Type 45-A pH Controller manufactured by Chemtrix, Inc. , Hills- boro, Oregon 97123 or its equivalent, in conjunction with a metering pump and reservoir of 0.5 N acetic acid. If such a system is not available, the following manual procedure shall be employed. I 7.13.1 A pH meter should be calibrated in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 7.13.2 The pH of the solution should be checked and, if necessary, 0.5 N acetic acid should be manually added to the extractor until the pH reaches 5.0 + 0.2. The pH of the solution should be adjusted at 15-, 30-, and 60-min intervals, moving to the next longer interval if the pH does not have to be adjusted more than 0.5 pH units. 7.13.3 The adjustment procedure should be continued for at least 6 hr. 1 • 7.13.4 If, at the end of the 24-hr extraction period, the pH of the solution is not below 5.2 and the maximum amount of acid (4 ml per gram of solids) has not been added, the pH should be adjusted to 5.0 + 0.2 and the extraction continued for an additional 4 hr, during whicl-i the pH should be adjusted at 1-hr intervals. 1 7.14 At the end of the extraction period, deionized water should be added to the extractor in an amount determined by the following equation: V = (20)(W) - 16(W) - A where: 1 V = ml deionized water to be added W = weight in g of solid charged to extractor A = ml of 0.5 N acetic acid added during extraction -16- f 11 4 i 1310 / 13 II 7.15 The material in the extractor should be separated into its compo- nent liquid and solid phases in the following manner. I ' 7.15.1 Allow slurries to stand to permit the solid phase to settle (wastes that are slow to settle may be centrifuged prior to filtration) and set up the filter apparatus (refer to Section 4.3 and 4.4). I7.15.2 Wet the filter with a small portion of the waste's or extraction mixture's liquid phase. Transfer the remaining material to the filter holder and apply vacuum or gentle pressure (10-15 psi ) until II all liquid passes through the filter. Stop filtration when air or pressurizing gas moves through the membrane. If this point is not reached under vacuum or gentle pressure, slowly increase the pressure in II10 psi increments to 75 psi. Halt filtration when liquid flow stops. 7.16 The liquids resulting from Sections 7.5 and 7.15 should be combined. II This combined liquid (or the waste itself if it has less than 0.5% solids, as noted in Section 7.8) is the extract and should be analyzed for the presence of any of the contaminants specified in Table 1 using the Analytical Proce- dures designated in Section 7.17. II7.17 The extract will be prepared and analyzed according to the analyt- ical methods specified in Table 1. All of these analytical methods are II included in this manual . The method of standard addition will be employed for all metal analyses. II NOTE: If the EP extract includes two phases, concentration of contaminants is determined by using a simple weighted average. For example: An EP extract contains 50 ml of oil and 1,000 ml of an aqueous phase. Contaminant concentrations are determined for each phase. The final contamination 1 concentration is taken to be (50) (contaminant conc. in oil ) + (1,000) (contaminant conc. of aqueous phase) 1,050 1,050 • 7.18 The extract concentrations are compared to the maximum contamina- tion limits listed in Table 1. If the extract concentrations are equal to or greater than the respective values, then the waste is considered to be EP toxic.1 1Chromium concentrations have to be interpreted differently. A waste containing chromium will be determined to be EP toxic if (1) the waste extract has an initial pH of less than 7 and contains more than 5 mg/1 of hexavalent II chromium in the resulting extract, or (2) the waste extract has an initial pH greater than 7 and a final pH greater than 7 and contains more than 5 mg/1 of hexavalent chromium in the extract, or (3) the waste extract has an initial pH greater than 7 and a final pH less than 7 and contains more than II 5 mg/1 of total chromium, unless the chromium is trivalent. To determine whether the chromium is trivalent, the sample must be processed according to an alkaline digestion method (Method 3060) and analyzed for hexavalent IIchromium (Methods 7195, 7196, or 7197). I II -17- >a 1310 / 14 i 8.0 Quality Control 8.1 All quality control data should be maintained and available for easy reference or inspection. 8.2 Employ a minimum of one blank per sample batch to determine if 1 contamination or any memory effects are occurring. 8.3 All quality control measures suggested in the referenced analytical 1 methods should be followed. i 1 1 i 1 i 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 _18_ 1 I Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ' Hazardous Waste Division 520 Lafayette Road St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 ' (612) 296-7790 Hazardous Waste Disposal Services and Facilities ' Septerrber, 1986 The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) maintains the following list of hazardous waste management/ disposal facilities solely as a service to Minnesota generators. The information was voluntarily supplied 1 by the companies and is not necessarily a complete list of available services. The list, and the additional information described below, does not endorse specific facilities. The MPCA, by I providing this list, and the additional information described below, does not represent that the ccnpanies are or are not in compliance with applicable laws. The MPCA cautions all generators that they are responsible for insuring that the hazardous waste management companies they use carply with the recirements of state and federal law. The NPCA further cautions generators to personally evaluate the services and compliance status of any companies they use to manage hazardous waste. The MPCA has more detailed information for the companies included on the list. The information includes I another version of the list which provides information on waste types accepted, management methods and other services. This list is available on a limited basis. Additionally, the MPCA maintains a file which may contain carpany brochures, correspondence and other information for the listed companies. The list that follows is sorted alphabetically by state and company name. The MPCA periodically updates this list. 1 II ALLWORTH ENTERPRISES, INC. CONTACTS: LESLIE ALLEN * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS (205) 8411707 PERMITTED BY EPA AND ALARAMA D.E.M. 500 MEDCO ROAD PRIMARILY SOLVENTS BIRMINGHAM, AIL 35217 ( ) EPA-IDS# f LD094476793 NO P OR 1; LISTED WASTES II CHEMICAL WASTE MANAGE T, INC. CONTACTS: RODGER HE SO+N * RCRA S AR E'/COMENT5 4 (205) 6529721 INTERIM STATUS - PART B UNDER REVIEW II 1 P.O. BOX 55 WASTE *EMT. INC. (ILLINOIS) MOST RCRA WASTE - LANDFILL IS FINAL BELLE, AL 65459 (312) 6548800 EPA-IN AL0000622464 DISPOSITION INCINERATOR PLANNED I FELS AND CHEMICALS, INC. CONTACTS: MARK SHUTTLESWORTH * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS * (205) 5664544 NEW FACILITY - FINAL PART B IS PENDING P.O. BOX 726 D002 D007 0006 F003 F005 K022 K048 IICOALING, AL 35449 { ) EPA-ID# ALD98055985O K05i KC+62 RCYCLE/OTHER CW:M. TRT?ENT. M 1 M CHEMICALS, INC. CONTACTS: JIM MCCLENDON * RCRA STATUS/COMiENTS 4 (205) 5383300 PERKIfthil BY EPA AND ALABAMA D.E.M. ' P.O. BOX 291 PRIMARILY SOLVENTS GADSEN, AL 35902 ( ) EFA-ID# ALD070513767 NO P OR K LISTED WASTES IDIAL REFINERY, INC. CONTACTS: ERNEST MONROE + RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS P.O. BOX 230 (501) 5233779 INTERIM STATUS PART B VAN DYKE ROAD PRIMARILY SOLVENT TYPE WASTES BIAZ, AR 72043 ( ) EPA-IDI ARIt092915735 1 1 f LS tNSC43.1W— rONIACIS: CHARLES ROBERTSON/J. F'4W:+15Gh P:F:A STATLK/C:C+Mm`h7 4 164p 1 163717? /NTEPEM STATUS PAP TF F,,'., BOY 1Q•5- ALTERNATE Mr C _ .'. INCINERATOR MOST R{�Ri1 ,K,c ITC I"_k{r;C_ r. 71770 (Si. ) 3/2336 EPA-H.14 .,.,E»:374313 SOME RESTRICTIONS ' SOUTHERN C4 . CHzM (C? CHEMICALS) CONTACTS: SITE PHONE t RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS (213) 698803, INTERIM STATUS PART B I :3851 5. DICE DAVID BRICKLEY (CIRCUIT CHEM.) METAL RECOVERY SANTE FE SPRINGS CA 90670 (612) 4792008 EPA-IDI CAD008462025 PRIMARILY CU OR NI BEARING WASTE LANDFILL SERVICE CORP. CONTACTS: SITE PHONE 4 RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS 4 II 99X 69 1319) 3456316 RCS} CLEW RE MIME 104 BLACKHAWK ST. NO LONGER ACCEPTING HAZARDOUS WASTE REINBECK, IA 50669 ( ) EPA-ID# 1AD075848065 I ENVIROSAFE SERVICES OF IDAHO CONTACTS: DAVE ASPITARTE * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS * (208) 3841500 INTERIM STATUS PART B I P.O. BOX 417 JANET KRONWALL (REGION REP.) LANDFILL RESTRICTIONS APPLY BOISE ID 63701 (303) 4994619 EPA-ID# 1DD073114654 ACCEPTS MOST RCRA WASTES AMERCIAN WASTE PROCESSING,INC. CONTACTS: FRANK BROWN 4 RCA STATUS/COMMENTS 4 (312) 6813999 INTERIM STATUS - PART B UNDER REVIEW' P.O. BOX 306 MOST RCRA WASTE NO PESTICIDES OR PCB MAYWOOD IL 60153 (312) 5201393 EPA-ID# 1LD000716894 P.F.I. OF ILLINOIS (CECOS) CONTACTS: SITE PHONE 4 RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS * I (312) 7465//! INTERIM STATUS - PART B UNDER REVIEW 2230 ERNEST KRUEGER CIRCLE DAN DUTTON NO LIQUIDS EXPLOSIVES OR ACIDS II WAUEEGAN, IL 60065 (312) 6233870 EPA-ID# ILD9807O0728 UTTER LANDFILL RESTRICTIONS C.I.D. LANDFILL (WASTE MGMT. INC.) CONTACTS: BILL KARPAS * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS * 1 (312) 6911500 INTERIM STATUS 130TH AND CALUMET EXPRESSWAY MOST RCRA WASTES CALUMET CITY, IL 60409 (312) 646211/ EPA-IN 1LD010284248 LANDFILL RESTRICTIONS C.P. INORGANICS, INC. CONTACTS: KEN SELBY * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS 4 II (815) 7271074 INTERIM STATUS - PART B UNDER REVIEW INDUSTRIAL AVE. NARROW RANGE PERMIT FOR CU AND NI JOLIET, IL 60435 ( ) EPA-ID# ILD062480850 WASTES. NO MULTIPLE COMPONENTS ETC. ' CHEW-CLEAR, INC. CONTACTS: MATT THOMPSON * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS * (312) 6466202 INTERIM STATUS - PART B UNDER REVIEW 11800 S. STONY ISLAND AVE. MARK LOPEGRA METAL SLUDGES PLATI% BATHS BOILER S CHICAGO IL 60617 (312) 6466202 EPA-IB# ILD000606471 MISC. INORGANIC NO FLAMKAB1ES CUSTOM ORGANICS- CHICAGO CONTACTS: GILBERT GAVLIN * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS 4 I (312) 2472823 INTERIM STATUS 1445 NEST 42ND STREET SOLVENT TYPE WASTE - OTHER ORGANICS CHICAGO, IL 60639 ( ) EPA-ID# ILD005450697 LIQUIDS ONLY I E W R CORPORATION CONTACTS: ROBERT DLONDIN * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS * (615) 6342211 PART B FILED 4/29/65 POST OFFICE BOX 160 SOLVENTS PAINTS OILS ORGANICS ETC. COAL CITY, IL 60416 ( ) EPA-1T4t ILD067!5 251 WASTE MUcT BORN- FLASH POINT BELOW 1 E?VIRITE CORP. (L101WICGN CORP.) CONTACTS: DOUGLAS NB MAN 4 RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS + (312) 5967040 INTERIM STATUS - PART B UNDER REVIEW' 16435 CENTER AVE. KAREN LYMAN INORGANIC WASTES ONLY HARVEY, IL 60426 (312) 5967040 EPA-ID! ILD000666206 METALS CORROSIVES MISC. ETC. ' 2 i� VMC)ESSON ENVIROSYSTEHS COMPANY CONTACT'=: M3. _AYE i? Ow )I + RCRA 'ETA IJS/=':M94TS + -.1:• :444,74 IN P'i4 _TATU. n .3 EG'=I 13'2IH 54REET !44TH.::'_,'Z?4 .!4, - !"'�.'.. :OL'VENT TYPE iIC,';i D LTON, IL 60414 (61.2) 76924013 EF'A-IC+# ILO9Eo6139i_ c. C A CHEMICAL SERVICES CONTACTS: SITE PHONE * r"s_R,Y4 STATUS/COMMENTS E (312) 6465700 INTERIM STATUS - PART B WIDER REVIEW II 1170+0+ SOUTH STONY ISLAND BILL CAMLIN INCINERATION - MOST P1-PA WASTES CHICAGO, IL 60617 (312) 8418360 EPA-ID# ILD000672121 SOME RESTRICTIONS SAFETY - KLEEN CORPORATION CONTACTS: MIKE BOVEE * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS II (612) 8901022 PERMIHE6 STORAGE/TRANS FER 6 BFG TIMBER ROAD BOB DAVIS (ELGIN IL.) CUSTOMERS ONLY SOLVENTS ELGIN IL 60120 (312) 6976460 EPA-?D# MND000686IBB BURNSVILLE SITE - MOVING TO EAGAN IISAFETY-KLEEN CORP. CONTACTS: INDUSTRIAL SOLVENTS; DEPT. * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS * (312) 6978460 PART B APPROVED 3/84 777 BIG TIMBER ROAD BOB DAVIS THIS IS THE MAIN PLANT FEC?EV?NG IELGIN, IL 60123 (312) 6973460 EPA-IN ILD000 0 911 MN. SAFETY-KLEEN WASTE SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. (CLODUET SITE) CONTACTS: BOB DAVIS (ELGIN IL.) * RCRA STATUS/CCU! TS * 1 i 30i2 18TH STREET CL{+GUET, MN (312) 6978460 PERM?i{ti+ STORAGE/TRANSFER 6. BIG TIMBER ROAD PHIL HELZARK CUSTOMERS ONLY ELGIN IL 60120 (218) 8792164 EPA-ID# MND0006B617O WASTE SENT TO ELGIN IL. PLANT II SAFETY-4:LEEN CORP. (ST. FAIL SITE) CONTACTS: DENNIS HEAVER * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS �4 (612) 4327331 PERMITTED STORAGE/TRANSFER 777 BIG TIMBER ROAD BOB DAVIS (ELGIN IL.) CUSTOMERS ONLY IIELGIN IL 60120 (312) 6978460 EPA-ID# MND000'323823 WASTE SENT TO ELGIN IL. PLANT SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CHEMICAL CO. CONTACTS: ROBERT EVANS * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS * I P.G. BOX 432 (815) 9232136 INTERIM STATUS PART B METAL RECOVERY MAINLY CU AND NI UNION IL 60180 ( ) EPA-IDI ILD059463061 U TRADE WASTE INCINERATOR INC. CONTACTS: SITE PHONE STATUS/COMMENTS * (618) 2412804 INftHIM STATUS - PART B UNDER REVIEW #1 MOBILE STREET BILL COIN INCINERATION - MOST RCRA WASTE I SA T, IL 62201 (312) 8418360 EPA-ID# ILD098642424 SOME RESTRICTIONS APPLY ADAMS CENTER LANDFILL CONTACTS: WETDELL LATTZ * RCRA STATUS/COMMENT3 it- (219) 4475565 INTERIM STATUS PART B UNDER REVIEW II 4636 ADAMS CENTER ROAD JOHN KU'AR (REGION REP.) MOST RCRA WASTES FORT WAYNE IN 46606 (414) 2556655 EPA-?D# IND078911146 LANDFILL RESTRICTIONS - NO LIOUIDS ETC II AMERICAN CHEMICAL SERVICE, INC. CONTACTS: WALT WAGONER * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS * (219) 9244370 INTERIM STATUS PART B UNDER REVIEW 420 SOUTH COLFAX RfrIPARLE AND FLAMMABLE LIOUIDS ONLY GRIFFITH, IN 46319 ( } EPA-ID# IND016360265 II BY-PRODUCTS MANAGEMENT, INC. CONTACTS: RON FENNY RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS * (221Q1 3222560 INTERIM STATUS 1150 JUNCTION AVE. MOST RCRA WASTES IISCI- h''EFVILLE. IN 70525 { ) EPA-ID# INDr4: 493985 RECYCLE C H Yh E AT !Err A`' E INDUSTRIAL FUELS AND RESOURCES CONTACTS: SITE PHONE * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS * II (219) 2340441 INTERIM STATUS PART B t1DER REVIEW 04 S. SCOTT STREET CHARLES WESSELS (REGION REP.) SOLVENTS OILS PAINTS ORGANICS SOUTH BEND IN 46625 (312} 5973380 EPA-ID# IND980590947 RECYCLE ONSITE BURN OFF-SITE II 3 I A A i RfRA STATUS/CCN{Si?' + {`?+1 C" i f , CONTACTS: VON E. MASON:", ' 1 44, , -i._-4,,:-. c; INTT PiM STA B; '4?`°� I EN RECOVERY - LPA-1 DA ?Hhk154,2+;2,10 I MC ES3ON •,O.%INI IND CHEMICAL CORP. CONTACTS: SITE PHONE 127 +?ES = _-;-=' * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS * (502) 6452452: ISSUED FOR STORAGE 3/66 ?DO C.OM!M'L=R;:E BUILDING PERMIT iSSa + E,' � 200 0'M MCKESSON CO. IN 46802 SOLVENT TYPE WASTES (612) 7892403 EPA-{DA {;7' 053348i08 NATIONAL ELECTRIC, INC. CONTACTS: BILL HANKS I f 316) 2516380 * RCRA STATUS/C{a�TS .* P.O. BOX 935 REGULATED LRfDER TOSCA JOHN HENS{.HEL/DAVIT+ KEYES PCB ONLY COFFEYVILLE KS 67337 (612) 4693475 EPA-IA4 K5D9 80964993 I I P.P.M., INC. CONTACTS: GARY MCCUISTION * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS * • (913) 6214206 TOSCA REGULATES 10 CENTRAL AVE. EARL FINDER (REGION REP.) KANSAS CITY KS 6 PEAS ONLY II(412) 4330244 EPA-ii+ik M!3f1069:77549 L.N.B., INC, CONTACTS: AMOS SHELTC+N/KEAN MC)INM Y P.O. BOX 327 * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS 4 II (5021 3 958:313 INTERIM STATEN; PART B UNDER REVIEW CALVERT CITY TREATMENT BY INCINERATION KY 42029 ( ) EPA-111# KYTi088438817 MOST RCRA WASTE SOME RESTRICTIONS L.N.L., INC. CONTACTS: AMOS SHLETON il * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS (502) 3959313 PERMI l M tip 9 P.O. BOX 327 /30/85 KEAN MCKINNEY APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS FOR INCINERATIlIl CALVERT CITY KY 42029 (5021 3958313 EPA-IDS KYDO88438974 ALSO ACCEPTS WIN•-FfAZARDOFIS BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES (CECOS) CONTACTS: BUTCH ELFIN if RCRA STATUS/MOMS • (318) 5276857 INTERIM STATUS PART B P.O. BOX 669 X LiVIff6STC1N, L A 7(+5,64 MOST RCRA WASTES LANDFILL ON-SITE NJ (504) 6867252 EPA-ILA LAL000618256 OTHER INCINERATOR AND OTHER OFF-SITE CECOS INTERNATIONAL (B.F.I.) CONTACTS: STEVE JACOBS I P.O. (504) 6867252 INTERIM*STATUS cPART cBC.C+MMENTS RCRA C BOX 649 T + SITE PHONE MOST RCRA WASTE LANDFILL AND OTHER LIVINGSTON, LA 70754 (504) 6867280 EPA-ID4 LAD000618298 ON-SITE INCINERATOR AND OTHER OFFSITT� CHEMICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT CONTACTS: LAURA F.. _RUNES RT. 2 BOX 1935 * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS if- , (318) 5832144 INTERIM STATUS PART B UNDER REVIEW II JOHN BRANNON ROAD JOHN KUPAR/CONTRIILED WASTE MOST RCRA WASTES LANDFILL AND OTHER CARIYSS LA 70663 (414) 2556655 EPA-IDS LAD000777201 ONSITE INCINERATOR AND OTHER OFFSITE ROLLINS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. CONTACTS: PAULA U. ARO T I * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS if(504) 7781234 INTERIM STATUS PART B UNDER REVIEW 13351 SCENIC HWY., P.O. 73677 MOST RCRA WASTES INCINERATOR BATON ROUE LA 70807 ( ) EPA-1D* LADG10395127 LANDFILL AND OTHER METHODS CHEM-LEA CONTACTS: TOM KALIL ' * RE RA ;FATuSlCOMME?fTS * 0 SELL ST, (311) 6853910 INTERIM STATUS PART B 1.10 RUS'_ ' BALT?MORE MOST RCRA WASTE TREAT ON SITE THEN MD 21230 (312) 6466202 EPA-IDA MDL9805551B9 DISPOSAL OFFEITE CHEM--ME-T CONTACTS,: JAMES TURNER * R{kA STATEIS MfTS * ' 18550 ALLEN ROAD (313) 2329250 INTERIM STATUS PART A UNDER REVIEW WYANDt}FTE, MF 48192 MOST RCRA WASTE - TREATMENT - RECYCLE ( ) EPA-ID1 MID096963194 CHEM. FIXATION - TRANSFER STATION 4 I 1 Y MFCH :N DISPOSAL -_°:: NORTH I '44 __RVICE DRIVE ELLEVILL E MI 48111 coNrr_r= :Ti r aN _*Fi:E MAIr_Y ;t±Ini=iC r a aTC. PRiI Ti (313) 697783' EPA-ID# MI0000724831 LAND FILLING AT WAYNE DISPOSAL NELSON INDUSTRIAL SERVICES- DETROIT CONTACTS: SANDRA SfLWARS # R RA STATUS/COMMENTS II (313) 9331350 INTERIM STATUS RAPT B UNDER REVIEW 12381 SCNAEFER HIGHWAY (313) F'LANC1 INORGANIC WASTES ONLY DETROIT, MI 48227 (313) 9331330 EPA-ID% M10098011992 CYANIDES HIGHLY CONCENTRATES I PETRD-CI EM PROCESSING CONTACTS: XXXX * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS OMMENT3 (313) 5529227 INTERIM STATUS 421 LYCASTE FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS FOR FEEL-BLENDING IIDETROIT, MI 46214 ( ) EPA-IDW MID9E:0615298 SOLVENTS OILS ETC. WAYNE DISPOSAL INC. CONTACTS: SITE PHONE f RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS * II (313) 6977330 PERMFIItU 49350 NORTH SERVICE DRIVE OFFICE MOST LIOQUIDRCRA S WAST- ETC. LANDFILL RESTRICTION IIFINISHING EQIPMENT, INC. CONTACTS: WIN SABATM,A + RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS 3640 KENNEBEC DRIVE (612) 452166!1 PART B ( DER REVIEW CUSTOMERS ONLY SOLVENT RECYCLING ST. PAUL MN 55122 ( ) EPA-ID# MND006449474 PRIMARILY MEI: AND TRI{:FR1f I GOPHER SMELTING COMPANY CONTACTS: JOHN TAPPER * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS I. (612) 4543:310 PART B WILL BE CALLED IN I 3385 HIGHWAY 149 RECYCLE LEAD BAi itli?ES EAGAN, MN 55121 ( ) EPA-ID4 MND006148092 INC KESSON CHEMICAL CO. (MPLS) CONTACTS: REIN GILMORE * RCRA STATUSfCOMMENrS (612) 7692403 PERMI+1t3 STORAGETTRAHSFER 111 22ND AVENUE N.E. CUSTOMERS ONLY MIGHT TAKE SOME OTHERS MINNEAPOLIS MN 55418 ( ) EPA-IDR MND054497052 SOLVENT TYPE WASTE IINATIONAL ELECTRIC INC CONTACTS: JOHN HENSCFEL * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS (612) 4693475 PERMIIftU STORAGE/TRANSFER FOR PCB 21400 HAMBURG AVE. BRIAN BROSNAN PCB ONLY ON THIS ID 4 ALSO A ILAKEVILLE, MN 55044 (612) 4693475 EPA-ID4 MND930791321 TRANSFER STATION FOR MANY WASTES NATIONAL ELECTRIC INC. CONTACTS: JOHN HENSCHEL VICE PRES 4 RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS * I 4 (612) 4693475 TRANSFER STATION ONLY AT THIS TIME 21400 HAMBURG AVE. CHUCK KILLER MOST RCRA WASTES SPECIALIZES IN SMALL LAKEVILLE MN 55044 (612) 4693475 EPA-ID* MND981190242 WANT. TRANSPORTER AND BROKER * 1 SOLV-OIL SERVICE AND SUPPLY CO. CONTACTS: DAVID TC-LEFSC+N * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS 6441 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE (612) 9378086 PERMII(EL) STORAGE/TRANSt-±R BOX 336 USED OIL AND NONHAL. E'+EVENTS IHOPKINS MN 55343 ( ) EPA-ID4 MND000685941 FUEL BLENDING SERVICE WARDEN OIL CO. CONTACTS: A.L. WARDEN * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS * (612) 3741200 INTERIM STATUS PART B DIE Ii 8.: II 187 F&RfBOLDT AVE. NO. OIL AND MINERAL SPIRITS MINNEAPOLIS MN 55405 ( ) EPA-ID4 MNBOC+621169: FUEL BLENDING AND BURNED ON-SITE I WORPI CHEMICAL CO. CONTACTS: R. W. PUTNAM JR. 4 RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS (612) 6459225 PERMItlt8 STORAGE/TRANSFER II 2130 KASOTA AVE. RUTH °CONNELL CUSTOMERS ONLY SOLVENT TYPE WASTE ST. PANE. MN 55108 (612) 645'9224 EPA-ID# MN0006213664 5 CONTACTS: ;HEFEE MILLER 4, , t��,_. � _» /614) 4 7 i(+I.F;4 * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS :;ANA, CITY MIrt '-�NN9V:. RE*LATE[t BY TOSCA (Ski 47F,654 EPN-I[t# MCt{+9906=;':044 II PCB DISPOSAL /STET'S INC. CONTACTS: SITE PHONE (8f6i 7325591 * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS ROUTE i BOX l;0 1 REGULATED BY TOSCA KFN+ ;VFLLE } 64061 PCB ONLY II ( ) EPA-ID# MOD980962849 RECLAMARE ENTERPRISES CONTACTS: P.O. B0X 31044 MERRILL NISSEN t RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS * II 6402 STADIUM DR. (646) 9215511 NOT REGL4ATED UNDER RCRA - OPERATI KANSAS CITY MO 64129 ( ) UNDER SO. PERMIT ARR-008 EF'A-ID# M0[+000669026 TIN AND LEAD BEARING WASTES ONLY S E D INC.- GREENSBCiRO, N.C. CONTACTS: FEN FRANK^^ ' ('?f9) 854F682 * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS * 500 EAST RADAR ROAR REGULATED UNDER TOSCA GREENSBORO, NC 27410 PCB WASTE ONLY f ) EPA-IDS NCQ9:30600449 II SEABOARD CHEMICAL CORP. ONTACTS: JAMES LEDERER t._ o II- RCRA STATUS/tom �. 5899 RIVERDALE DRIVE (919) 886648,(4 INTERIM STATUS PSI B II STC+NN NC. 27262 ( ) SOLVENT RELATED WASTES EPA-ID# NCD071574164 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. CONTACTS: SITE PHONE I (701) 2379070 1537 1/2 F? ;�; c * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS P_T AVE. S BOB DAVIS (ELGIN IL.) FNTERIM STATUS PART 9 FARCE}, NQ 58103 (312) 6978460 EPA-ID# NDD000716738 MC KESSON CHEMICAL CO. (OMAHA) CONTACTS: JOHN RALSTON II 3900 [{ STR * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS *• (402) 7337007 ?? OMAHA NE 68107 ( ) II EPA-FIN) NED040906729 CP CHEMICALS INC. CONTACTS: PHIL EDELSTEIN * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS ' (20 1) f,C;f 4:,00 f-OMMETFFS tF ARBOR ST, INTERN STATUS FART 8 UNDER REVIEW BOREN DAVID DRICKLE'Y (CIRCUIT CHEM.) METAL RECOVERY MAINLY CU AND NI NJ 07077 (612) 4792008 ETA-IDR NJC+00 2 1 4 1 950 O.M.F. INT./SELREX PLATING SYSTEMS CONTACTS: JEFFREY BIRCHMIER II*(241) 6675200 RCRA STATUS/CATS 75 RIVER ROAD PREVIOUSLY EXEMPT FROM RCRA - STATUS !NUTLEY NJ 07140 ( ) CHANGING AT THIS TIME (7/86) SEE FILE II EPA--IIl# NJD044654978 F007 TO F012 WASTES PASS RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC. CONTACTS: JOSEPH D'AMICO (241) 7724360 * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS * II 1500 MAIN AVENUE INTERIM STATUS PART A CLIFTON, ( ) -•Bilk ACCEPTS DRUMS OF SOLDER SCRAP AND NJ 07011 EPA NJDO22095269 LEAD-BEARING SOLIDS S & W WASTE, INC. CONTACTS: ROBERT CHITREN I (201) 3444004 * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS * 105 105 •}^trC �S, AVE. INTERIM STATUS PART B UNDER REVIEW AY JAY PERLSTEIN NJ 07032 f 201) 3444f>F)4 MOST RCRA WASTES C . FIXATION C+N- EPA-1D# NJQ991291105 SITE TRANSFER STATION FOR OFFSITE C A CHEMfICAL SERVICES- NEWARF' CONTACTS: MARK MOTYLEWSKI (201) 4659100 * RCM- STATUS/COMMENT; * I 107 ALBERT AVE. INTERIM STATUS PART B UNDER REVIEW AL WILLIAM GAMIN (REGION REP.) ACCEPTS MOST RCRA WASTES NJ 07105 (312) 8418360 EPA-111# NJD089216790 MANY METHODS OF TIER 6 .T r I * J.S. ECOLOGY (NUCLEAR ENGINEERING) CONTACTS JEY LECOMPTE # RCRA STN?iiS ^, N,�; #A> , .-- _ i 3O')) i 2.6531 INTERIM STATUS cc.PT 3 (ysEE EVE P.O. BOX 576 FEN fI.ELIN LANDFILL REC T...I,- IO.: HE FILE IBEATTY, NV 8-?003 (.3G01 6265:17 EPA—IDR Nfi 33UOPf'- BDT, INC. (PAlIEHY DISPOSAL TECHOL.OGY) CONTACTS: NANCY BEENE * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS (716) 7592868 PART B APPROVED I 4255 RESEARCH PARKWAY ALAN WILDS METALS CORROSIVE REACTIVE CLARENCE, NY 14031 (716) 7592868 EPA—ILi4 NYD000632_72: MISC. INOR ANIC OTtER I CECOS INTERNATIONAL CONTACTS: CRAIG FROST (716) :322676 RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS INTERIM STATUS PART B P.O. BOX 340—LPO MOST RCRA WASTES LANDFILL AND OTHER NIAGARA FALLS NY 14304 ( ) EPA—IDR NYB0SA:336241 ONSITE INCINERATION/OTHER OFFSITE IIFRONTIER CHEMICAL WASTE PROCESS, INC. CONTACTS: LINDA CARR * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS * (716) 2852581 INTERIM STATUS PART B E&JBMTtttii 10/65 I 4626 ROYAL AVENUE NICHOLAS BALODFMAS (REGIONAL) MOST RCRA WASTES STATE INDICATES NIAGARA FALLS NY 14303 (312) 5201393 EPA—IC+4 NY0043815703 PROBLEMS WITH THIS CO. SEE THE FILE SCA CHEMICAL WASTE SERVICES CONTACTS: SITE PHONE * RCRA STATTYS/COMMENT'S i II (716) 7548231 INTERIM STATUS PART B UNDER REVIEW 1135 BALMER ROAD, BOX 200 JOHN K}JPAR (REGION REP.) MOST RCRA WASTE LANDFILL AND OTHER MODEL CITY, NY 14107 (414) 2556455 EPA—ID4 NYD049836679 ONSITE INCINERATION AND RECYCLE OFF IALCEEM—TRON, INC CONTACTS: SITE * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS 4 (216) 4415628 INTERIM STATUS PART B 7415 BESSEMER ORGANICS ALE. SOLVENT OILS REACTIVE IICLEVELAND OH 44127 ( ) EPA—IDR 0(1D930569438 THERMAL TRTMENT. AND OTHER ASHLAND CHEMICAL COMPANY CONTACTS: ARLENE HENDRICKSON * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS * I (614) 8893333 PER41i t tti) STORAGE/TRANSFER P.O. BOX 2219 FORREST COLSTON PRIMARILY CUSTOMERS ONLY BUT MAY TAKE COLUMBUS OH 43216 (612) 4457214 EPA—ID% MN0000686709 OTHER SOLVENT/METAL/MISC./D001/D002 ICECOS INTERNATIONAL (CECOS/C'ER CO.) CONTACTS: LINDA BARLOW * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS(513) 7246114 INTERIM STATUS — PART B UNDER REVIEW 4679 SPRING GROVE AVE. RON KCOEHLER MOST RCRA WASTES SEVERAL METHODS OF ICINCINATI, OH 45232 (800) 5430274 EPA—ID# OHD000316629 TREATMENT/DISPOSAL ON— AND OFF—SITE CECOS INTERNATIONAL, INC. CONTACTS: SITE PHONE * RCRA STATUS/CORENTS * (513) 7246114 INTERIM STATUS I 5092 ABER RD. SALES MANY RCRA WASTES LANDFILL ONSITE WILLIAMSBUR OH 45176 (800) 5430274 EPA-1D4 OHD087433744 RESTRICTIONS APPLY I C}EM--CLEAR CONTACTS: TED VIROSVEf' * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS * (216) 4292401 INTERIM STATUS PART B 2900 BROADWAY MANY RCRA WASTES TREATED ONSITE AND CLEVELAND OH 44115 (312) 6466202 EPA—IN OHD000724153 BROKERED OFFSITE IIERIEWAY POLLUTION CONTROL, INC. CONTACTS: RENO COPPELLI * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS * (216) 4392955 INTERIM STATUS PART B I 33 INDUSTRY DR. MOST RCRA WASTE CHEM. FIXATION BEDFORD OH 44146 ( ) EPA—IB4 OHDO55522429 RECYCLE AND OTHER ONSITE/OTHER OFFSITE FONDESSY ENTERPRISES, INC. CONTACTS: SITE PHONE * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS 4 II (419) 7261521 PART A INfEHFM STATUS PART B SUBMITTED E76 OTTER CREED: ROAD MARK MEDICK/DEAN NARDI LANDFILL RESTRICTIONS SOLIDS ONLY AND ORESON, OH 43616 (312) 4596966 EPA—IDI OHD045243706 OTHER I - 7 I ROSS INCINERATION SERVICES, I►«_. CONTACTS: DENNIS P. ROSS * RCRA STATUS/COMME?1T5 * 3Q4 +I#_tc. ROAD i21�; 74=2171 INTERIM STATUS TREATMENT BY INCINERATION C,zA ONN i_r: .:.:044 } _ - ( Er'�-1t+4 {_nLk.{4Y'.:5�,�.5 MANY RCRA WASTES - SOME RESTRICTION EAFETr-KEEN CORP. CONTACTS: INDUSTRIAL SOLVENTS. DEPT. * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS 4 (312) 6978460 INttHIM STATUS PART B I 581 MILLIKEN DRIVE BOB DAVIS SOLVENT RECYCLING HEBRON, Off 43025 (312) 6978460 EPA-I1}* 0(f0980507364 SOLVENT RESOURCE RECOVERY CONTACTS: JOE HENEHAN * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS * I (5131 6596101 PERMIiitD 5/16/64 P.O. BOX 453 JOHN KUPAR SOLVENT AND RELATED WASTE WEST CARROLLTON OH 45449 (414) 2556655 EPA-ID4 OHB093945293 RECYCLE ON-SITE BURNED OFF-SITE I HYDROCARBON RECYCLERS, INC. CONTACTS: SITE * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS * (918) 4467434 INTERIM STATUS P.O. BOX 9557 EARL FINDER (LOCAL REP.) SOLVENT RELATED WASTES FOR RECYCLINIII TULSA OK 74157 (612) 6330244 EPA-1D4 M000632737 IFSPCI OWNS THIS COMPANY US POLLUTION CONTROL, INC. CONTACTS: JOHN FBcGNES * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS * 2000 CLASSEN CENTER (405) 5288371 INTERIM STATUS - PART B UNDER REVT,_ #1400 SOUTH EARL FINDER (LOCAL REP.) MOST RCRA WASTE LANDFILL AND SEVER OKLAHOMA CITY OF 73106 (612) 6330244 EPA-IDN 00065436376 TREATMENT METHODS CALGON CORPORATION- PITTSBURGH CONTACTS: XXXXX * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS 4 (412) 7778867 LIWNOWN 5750 GRAND AVE. NEVELLE ISLAND THIS IS A MOBILE TREATMENT SYSYTEM PITTSBEIRGH, PA 15225 ( ) EPA-ID4 PAD000736942 ' CHEM CLEAR CONTACTS: BETTY DUNKLE RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS * (215) 4974676 INTERIM STATUS PART B DELAWARE c JEht-HIES AVE. MANY RCRA WASTES TREATMENT MITE II CHESith PA 19013 (312) 6466202 EPA-ID# PAD000731026 AND TRANSFER STATION FOR OFF-SITE ENVTRITE CORP./LRC)UICON CONTACTS: XXXX * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS -4 I (717) 8461900 . INTERIM STATUS 1600 PENNSYLVANIA AVE. METAL SOLNS. CORROSIVE REACTIVE YORK, PA 17404 ( ) EPA-ID4 PAD010154045 OTHER LIQUIDS ONLY I CP CHEMICALS, INC. CONTACTS: CIRCUIT CHEM/DAVID BRICKLEY * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS * (612) 4792008 INTERIM STATUS PART B I METAL RECOVERY MAINLY CU AND NI SUMTER SC XXXXX (312) 6466202 EPA-ID4 SCD070371885 GROCE LABS CONTACTS: BILL GROC:E * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS * I HIGHWAY 200 (803) 8771048 INIEHIM STATUS - PART B ROBINSON ROAD AOUA-TECH, INC. MOST RCRA WASTE SEVERAL TREATMENT C(tEER SC 29651 (414) 2845746 EPA-I14 SCD058754789 PROCESSES I GSX SERVICES CONTACTS: SITE * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS * SUITE 128 (803) 4525003 FNitjIM STATUS PART B 100 EXECUTIVE CENTER DR. OFFICE MOST RCRA WASTE LANDFILL ON-SITE II COLUMBIA PC 2921(1 (803) 79829Q3 EPA-II3R SCL+0703/5985 ALSO CNEM. FIXATJCW AND OTHER STARLET( CORP. CONTACTS: SITE PHONE * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS * II (803) 3245310 INTERIM STATUS P.O. BOX 2664 CRS MOST RCRA WASTE STABILIZATION AND ROCK HILL SC 29731 ( ) EPA-IDs SCD044442333 OTHER TREATMENT I 0 I :k XP � 111 I . 54FIDY4LEEN CORP. CONTACTS: SITE PHONE * RCRA STATUS/CI)MMENT: > f,nS, _'?: -3) INTERIM STATUS PART 5 r.. 2(4.4 ti. WE[TPORT AVE. BOB DAVIS (ELGIN IL.) ' .:Y'r'. FA L_ SD 57147 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL WASTE CONTACTS: SITE PHONE * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS * (615) 7979067 TOSCA REGLIATES ' INDUSTRIAL DRIVE ROB BURETS pI B ONLY WHITE BLUFF TN 37187 (501) 3758444 EPA-II+$ TN{3980729305 IGSX CHEMICAL SERV. (TRIANOE RESOURCE) CONTACTS: DAN STUBBS * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS(800/ 2511227 INTERIM STATUS - PART B UNEIER REVIEW OLD GREENBRIER PIKE JAMEY JONES MOST RCRA WASTE SEVERAL TREATMENT I GREENBRIER, TN 37073 (502) 4256:317 EPA-IN TN0000645770 AND DISPOSAL METHODS ROLLINS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CONTACTS: SITE FI43NE 4 RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS (713) 4796001 INTERIM STATUS - PART B UNDER REVIEW I2027 BAT(LEGROL D RD., BOX 609 RICHARD TOBERMAN MOST RCRA WASTE LANDFILL AND D PARK, TX 77536 (713) 4796001 EPA-ID4 TXD055141373 INCINERATOR ON-SITE U.S. POLLUTION CONTROL, INC. CONTACTS: SITE PHONE * RCRA STATUS/COTS I (801) 2663908 INTERIM STATUS - PART B UNDER REVIEW 5662 'SOUTH 300 WEST EARL FINDER (REGION REP.) MOST RCRA WASTE SEVERAL TREAT) NT MURRAY UT 84107 (612) 6330244 EPA-IDB UTD991301746 AND DISPOSAL METHODS IIAQUA-TECH, INC.- POET WASHINGTON, WISC. CONTACTS: GREG WILLIAMS * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS(414) 2845746 **NOT A TSD*-* ACT AS A TRANSPORTER 140 SOFTTH PARK STREET ROY SHARPER BROKER SERVICE/LAB CAPABILITIES/OTHER IPORT WASHINGTON WI 53704 (612) 9224240 EPA-ID# WIDO66988017 I.E. ARRANGE DISPOSAL SERVICES MANIC IND. INC. (FORMERLY HYDRITE) CONTACTS: MICHAEL SEELIGER * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS + I (608) 2571414 INTERIM STATUS PART B 114 N MAIN JAMES GOMLEY SOLVENT WASTE ONLY COTTAGE GROVE WI 53527 (608) 2571414 EPA-IDR WIDO008O8824 RESTRICTS EXTREMELY HAZARDOUS ICONTROLLED WASTE (CHEM. WASTE MGMT) CONTACTS: DEAN THOIMPSON * RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS WEST 124 NORTH (414) 2 6`5 INTERIM STATUS - PART B UNDS2 REVIEW 9451 BOUNDARY ROAD BILL GA L1N STORAC.F AND TRANSFER STATION ONLY I MENOfMOt€E FALLS WI 53051 MILWAUKEE SOLVENTS AND CE7FCYLS CONTACTS: M 2)W N8418RTE360 EPA-ID# WIDO03967148 t i f.........r...••••••••••••• * RCRA STATUS/COrMENTS.*. 14765 WEST BOBOLINK AVE. (414) 2523550 INTERIM STATUS PART B UNDER REVIEW Al HALE SOLVENT TYPE WASTES MENOMONEE E WI 53051 (612) 6363311 EPA-1p4 W1D02335O192 55 GALLON MINIMUM II SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. CONTACTS: SITE PHONE (608) 7818878 * RCRA STATSTATUS/COMMENTS INTERIM STATUS PART B II- 2091 1/2 WARD AVE. BOB DAVIS (ELGIN) LACROSSE, WI 54601 (312) 6978460 EPA-ID# WFD980896641 IWASTE RESEARCH k RECLAMATION CO. CONTACTS: GENE JAMESOM it-ROUTE 7 RCRA STATUS/COMMENTS * II (715) 6349624 INTERIM STATUS F'AR'T B UNDER REVIEW ROBERT COMSTOCK MOST RCRA WASTE RECYCLE ON-SITE OR EAU CLAIRE WI 54701 (612) 7399305 EPA-ID4 WID990879475 BROKER OOFF-SITE I I9 I Planning Commission Meeting October 28, 1987 - Page 29 Erhart: Yes. Because they came out and did that sight improvement right outside Chanhassen Hills and all of a sudden, they never had any money for TH 101 and all of a sudden they do . Dacy: It's the developers . Erhart: I don't know. Somehow he feels with some appropriate pressure right now that he can get some funds. Siegel : We might as well try it. You've got to remember that TH 101 ' doesn't go through Chaska so it's a single community effort within this jurisdiction. Erhart: Anyway he's the Carver County Commissioner and if we could just get a resolution, let' s do it. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - GENERAL DISCUSSION. Conrad: Basically what staff would like on these items is our opinions 1 and then some direction as to , do we proceed? How do we proceed from here? Why don't we take them one at a time. Barbara Dacy presented the staff report on the 150 foot lot depth requirement. Emmings: I mentioned last time I thought that as the lot widths ' increase, and I thought maybe the sideyard setbacks ought to be increased or there ought to be some attempt to center that. I guess what I had in mind what someplace, if you've got a development in and if you've got 175 foot wide lots or 150 foot wide lots or something like that, somehow it seems that if there's a house built here and you've got an open lot for that house to come in and build within 10 feet of that lot line and decides to leave the other side of his lot completely open doesn ' t seem fair to that neighbor . Wildermuth: It depends on what he does with it though. If he builds a tennis court over there or something like that , swimming pool . Emmings: I guess what I'm thinking about is if I'm the neighbor that's ' living here, if we all have nice wide lots and he comes in and decides for whatever reason he wants his house as close to mine as he can get it, I'm not going to be very happy about that. I'm not going to happen to look at that. Now the neighbor on the other side may be just as happy as can be but I'm not going to be too happy. It seems to me that maybe there ought to be some kind of a sliding scale so that if you're making the lots wider to try and give it a kind of a look so the houses are a little further apart, why let this guy build all the way over next to the lot line within 10 feet of it so maybe if you have, I don' t know. Maybe if you have 100 foot lot, maybe you leave them at 10. If k_you have 150, maybe you increase it to 15. Just a little bit more just 1 Ai-Vett/0 11 Planning Commission Meeting October 28 , 1987 - Page 30 I ' to provide more of a buffer to the people who are already there. Siegel : Do we have a lot width requirement? Dacy: Yes , it' s 90 feet. Siegel : 90 feet so you' re not suggesting that we change that? Dacy: No. Lot width is later on. Siegel : How does that affect the strange shaped lot where we grant a variance because of the shape of the lot. We just created a 50 foot ' entryway to a 25,000 square foot lot. You know what I 'm talking about? Dacy: You mean a flag lot? ISiegel : Where you just have enough room for a driveway to get into a lot. ' Dacy: If it's going to be that large, I'm sure that the depth is going to be well in excess because the throat of that lot, the 50 foot strip is going to have to open out into a larger area for their flag portion Iif it's 25,000 square feet and that would certainly I would think would sir be excess of 150 feet. Is that what you ' re asking? ' Siegel: No, well I'm asking about it in the context of a subdivision. If it's obviously going to affect the two lots on either two sides of this entranceway and the configuration of those lots. In other words, we might have two 90 foot and a 40 foot entryway to a larger lot behind I it. Obviously the lot depth would be measured from where? The roadway or the back of that lot back in the back corner? Dacy: The ordinance defines lot depth as the average distance between the front property line abutting the public right-of-way back to the rear property line. ISiegel : So his depth would be from the road then to the back of his lot? IDacy: Right. We're going to be talking about flag lots and the problems that they pose a little bit later . Headla: Steve's got a point there. I'll give you a first hand example of that. Here's my property and the neighbors property goes like this. They put up a barn, and we're talking just imaginery but this thing is like 120 by 60 and we're 10 feet away from the line. If you Ilook at the watershed coming off of there and the snow and my fence line is right on the line, it used to be the fence is down, it raises havoc with the trees. It just doesn't seem right that they should be I able to put a building like that. If they were within the laws, I think we should control something like that and when you mentioned a 1 r Planning Commission Meeting October 28 , 1987 - Page 31 C sliding scale, I think that' s very appropriate. Dacy: I hate to do this sometimes but when I worked in Florida we did have an ordinance provision for sideyard setbacks. If a lot width exceeded 100 feet then the side setback would be 10% of the lot width but at minimum you had to have 8 feet as a side setback. I think that gets at what you're trying to do however there are two cautionary points that I want to throw on that. One is from an enforcement standpoint. It poses problems because it was one of those details that got lost in the process in the number of building permits every month to be looking at 1O%% of the 110.9 feet is 10.1 so they've got to have 10 feet on either side of the lot. The second comment that I would have is if you do have 110 or 120 foot wide lot, you would have a buildable area width of 100 feet and I'm sure there's going to be some isolated cases that some people are going to cramp all to one side. I think the norm is that people tend to center their homes on the lot. So there is a mechanism to do it. From a staff's standpoint we're kind of leary because of enforcement and monitoring aspect. That issue comes up on another item that we' re discussing. , Emmings: I guess my reaction is enforcement is a totally separate question. My notion is if that's what people will do anyway, then it will never be an issue and we don't have to worry about it but if it's there, then you protect. In that one case where the guy comes in and is going to be abusive, you've got a reason, something to point at to say no you can ' t do that. 1 Conrad: I don't know what abuse is. I'm having a tough time with that. I really understand what you're saying but if we have a sideyard setback of 10 feet and somebody meets that , we obviously feel that 10 feet is not an abuse of the neighbors property regardless of if the other side is 90 feet and this side is 10, it's still by ordinance we felt that it's good enough for everybody in the community. Somebody i gets the advantage of having 90 feet of sideyard but still the ordinance has protected you by the 10 feet. Headla: I think you're trying to measure something in strictly 1 absolute terms without stepping back and looking at the overall picture. My situation there, they've got about 500 feet, they're probably within 10 feet. 1 Conrad: I would just hate to get into ratios and stuff like that. It seems real arbitrary. I Emmings: You're saying arbitrary and you've got a 10 foot sideyard setback now and you tell me what great compelling logic that made that anything but arbitrary. Conrad: Let's do a couple things. Let's sort of take a straw poll here in terms of should we have staff proceed in allowing the depth to k.change from our current ordinance? Yea or nay on that? . 1 I C IIPlanning Commission Meeting October 28 , 1987 - Page 32 IC Erhart: We' re talking about 125 anyway? I Emmings: To whatever they want as long as they meet 15,000 square feet. IIDacy: No, we' re saying a minimum of 125 feet. Erhart: I 'm in favor of that. IEmmings : Yes . Siegel : Yes . II Conrad : Me too . I Wildermuth: We felt at the time when this ordinance was put into place that there was a value to having a deep lot along with the minimum of 15,000 square foot lots. I don' t think we've tested it I enough, given it a fair shot to change it now. Maybe 6 months from now or 4 or 5 subdivisions from now if it turns out to be an issue in every one, that the variances are coming at us from right and left on every one, then yes I think we better listen to what ' s going on. IHeadla: I'll go for 125 based on what Mark Koegler said last time. It ( certainly would make his planning a whole lot easier. IIConrad: It looks like consensus is to go ahead and draft something and pass it by the City Council. Jim, my only thought is, I hear you and I think that's valid yet on the other hand, when you think about a Iphysical look of a neighborhood, when you pack the houses together and they're only 20 feet apart, tome that looks crammed regardless of how deep the rearyard is so I think Council was talking about give people IIopen space in their rearyards but I think there's also something to the appearance. I think the flexibility to allow developers to use the land a little bit easier. So, it's a yea on that one. In terms of the scaled ratio, that seems real complicated to me but Tim, would you like to have staff work on some kind of a way to move that setback? Erhart: Nay. IEmmings: Yea . ISiegel : Yea. Wildermuth : I don' t care. III Headla: Yea . Conrad: And I'm a nay so we have two nays and three yeses and a I Udon't care so why don't you draft something that might seem easy to implement. I r Planning Commission Meeting October 28, 1987 - Page 33 Fence Ordinance. Olsen : Pretty much all we did was just to add into the fence section 1 of the ordinance to say that the use of barbed wire fence is prohibited . Conrad : How do you feel about that Dave? Headla: Now that' s any fence, barbwire that' s in place now is okay? I Olsen: Right it would probably be grandfathered in. Erhart: We're talking about no barbwire in the residential areas? ' We're not talking about agricultural? We're not talking about fences used for horses in agricultural areas? Olsen: It' s not in the agricultural . In the residential area. Headla: Where do you draw the line there? The people where we were all classified agricultural tax wise but you've got us listed as residential. Olsen : You' re zoned residential . ' Wildermuth: What about industrial where you've got a cyclone fence with a strand of barbwire? I think we should take a look at it. 1 Olsen : It' s not permitted right now anyway. Wildermuth: I think we should take a look at it because we may get 1 some kind of a business in town that has a very high security requirement and we ought to do something about it. Emmings: I didn't understand the language of the proposal because I understand what you're proposing. You say the use of barbed wire fences is prohibited in the residential districts for any use other than agricultural purposes. What would it be permitted for? Olsen: It could be used for agricultural purposes in the agricultural district. ' Emmings: No, that ' s not what that says though. Erhart: Yes, you need to go back and focus on that. It's really confusing . Headla : Steve, if I put cattle on my property, I interpret that as I can put up a barbwire fence. Emmings : Can you have cattle anyplace that ' s zoned residential . IPlanning Commission Meeting October 28, 1987 - Page 34 il 47 Headla : I 'm agricultural . Erhart : No, it says residential . The language is confusing . Olsen: No you' re not agricultural . You' re zoned residential . IIHeadla : My tax says I 'm agriculture. I Olsen: We want to make it clear that in the agricultural district, in the A-2 and unsewered areas where agriculture is a permitted use, there barbwire fences are permitted. In the single family districts where it' s not agricultural, it' s not a permitted use. IEmmings: Are you saying that barbwire fence will be prohibited in residential districts period? Then you need a period and you need to I delete the rest of that sentence. Then it says it can be used in the agricultural area and I guess it already says it, barbwire fences are permitted in the agricultural district when used for agricultural I purposes and I was just wondering if we ought to put in there or just put in, for active agricultural purposes or uses. The thought being that we would then have a way to go. I take it people don't like I barbwire and my thought was, if somebody wants to have, what do you use barbwire for? It's always for cattle and horses? Alright, so if ( they're going to have that use in the agricultural area, that's fine but let's make it almost like a conditional use in the sense that as II long as you're using it for cattle fine but if you're going to quit using it for cattle, you ought to take that barbwire out of there. Are we that much opposed to barbwire that we'd like to do something like I that? I personally have no feelings about it one way or the other . Erhart: I agree with Dave. When you get into the residential area I'm opposed to it but there's an advantage in the rural area even if I you have horses because for the money constraints you've got, you can provide a lot bigger area for your horses for a lot less money spent on a fence. There's a real advantage to it. I think I 'd be careful Iwording it so it doesn't get interpretted later that horses are not agricultural therefore it' s not useable on horses . Siegel: Does this anticipated change affect any existing stables in Ithe residential area? I can think of one. Those horse stables over there on CR 17. Right up by Shorewood . IConrad: Pat Jensen? Siegel : Pat Jensen Stables . ' Conrad: She' s gone. Moved out west. Siegel : They will be informed of the change or will they be ILgrandfathered in if they are barbwire? t r Planning Commission Meeting October 28, 1987 - Page 35 4 ' Olsen : They would be grandfathered in. Siegel: In a situation like that, would we inform them anyway just so they might do it out of their own goodwill? Olsen: What we'll do is just send them a notice to all people with 1 horses . Conrad : Jim, your concern? ' Wildermuth: What about a company coming into Chan Lakes Industrial Park. Let's say they process precious metals or something and they've got to put up a cyclone fence stranded with barbwire on top of the fence. Are you going to tell them they can ' t do that? Olsen: It does specify what kind of fences can be used in the ' industrial park. Dacy: It's prohibited in residential and commercial and industrial districts. The use of barbwire fence is prohibited in the commercial and industrial areas . Wildermuth: That's not what I would like to see. I would like to see it optional for your industrial area for example. You may want to put a minimum height. Conrad : That would probably be a good way to do it . ' Olsen: We've got a maximum of 8 feet in the commercial. Anything over that has to get a conditional use permit. Headla: If we left it as you suggested, no barbwire fencing, could a conditional use permit allow them to put barbwire at the 8 foot level? ' Olsen: Not with that language. You need to tell us what you want for commercial and industrial. They are allowed to go to 8 feet or barbwire may be considered in commercial and industrial areas through a conditional use permit. Headla: Maybe that' s a good way to do it. ' Wildermuth : I think that ' s good to do it as a conditional use permit. Siegel: Have we addressed the fencing requirements in commercial and industrial districts within the context of the fence ordinance? Dacy: Yes . ' ACCESSORY BUILDINGS . Jo Ann Olsen � presented the staff report on Accessory Buildings . r II k Planning Commission Meeting October 28 , 1987 - Page 36 li f Erhart: I like the concept and I think I was the one that started out with this thing. I think it's a good approach. I would just question I the example where someone comes in wanting, he's in a residential area and owns a big lot and wants to build a four stall detached garage with cedar shake roof and it's beautiful. He's going to spend $30,000.00 on 1 this garage and I think we need to accomodate that guy. I'd like to see us raise the 850 to 1, 400 but limit the height or whatever way you define the difference between a steel barn in a residential area and a IIbeautiful detached garage. That ' s the only concern I have. Emmings: I don't know how you're going to do that because if you allow the size, I think what the person chooses to build it out of, you Iaren't going to be able to regulate that. Erhart: Can't you make aesthetically similar to the main structure on I the house? I should say architecturally similar to the primary structure. I Emmings : I actually went through the same process. I thought a 3 car garage is very common today. I thought about building one and it's 22 by 36, which isn't far from the standard size, that's 792 square feet so that fell within the 800 so I was kind of comfortable with the 800 I myself but I agree with you, if somebody wanted it to be a four car garage and they were going to do a nice job, I really wouldn't have any Dbjections to that. I don't know how you can draw that line in I language in there. If they can think of someway to do it, that would be fine. Erhart: I think any number, 800 or 1,400 is going to eliminate the Iproblem we had with the 50 foot by 30 foot or how big was that barn? Headla: That was like 100 by 50 that he wanted to put in. That's the I one you really want to stay low. The height is a clear way to eliminate that one . IErhart: Even 50 by 30, that's like a small Menard's steel shed. What' s that size? 50 by 30 so that ' s 1, 500 square feet. IEmmings : If we can get away with saying that it will be architecturally consistent with the principal use, that would be nice. Headla: You're talking about these low sheet metal buildings and low Ibarns , they' re all portable. Erhart: I would think that 800 and 1,400, anywhere in that range would Iserve to cover that 30%. Emmings: What kind of a height minimum would help to get rid of these metal barns? IL I II Planning Commission Meeting October 28, 1987 - Page 37 Headla : What I was thinking , the only time people put up those buidings like that, they like to hide for dump trucks coming in, construction trucks. Like on mine, I have a 12 foot opening and that's mandatory for good sized equipment but if you limit it to 20 feet, you' re going to knock out the sheet metal buildings. Erhart: And yet you could still put a nice 3 car garage with a 20 feet ceiling I would think. Headla : I look at the height of my house, it isn ' t that high. Siegel: How many square feet existed in that infamous St. Louis Park treehouse? Probably 800 to 900 square feet? Okay, we better consider some types of these kinds of things. You're talking about the barn type of house structure and you're talking about height and square footage here. ' Erhart : At 1,400 square feet? Siegel: No, you're talking about you're trying to restrict that kind , of structure in size in relationship to the rear lot. But the rear lot may not be dimensional a part of a person's plan for detached accessory structure. Erhart: I thought we were talking about limiting height to 20 feet period. ' Siegel: That means no building could be taller than 20 feet? I don't know if Igo along with that for every application in the world. I can see your point and what you're trying to achieve but I can see some structures coming in here for permits, especially for the larger pieces of property. I 'm talking about a detached building on the lot . Erhart: In the first place the ordinance doesn't allow detached garages . Dacy: No, it says if you have a certain style house you have to attach ' your garage but you can have detached garages. Erhart : I agree that we should allow detached garages . ' Siegel: We already have. There have been people in here asking for permits for detached garages . Dacy: Weren't you saying, we're talking specifically about the rearyard area and somebody is going to build a four car garage, it's going to be detached, it's going to be fairly close from the side or the rear of the lot. Erhart: So we don't get into problems with horses, I think you should ,cake out the rearyard and just call it accessory buildings. C 4a IIPlanning Commission Meeting October 28, 1987 - Page 38 Dacy: I think the original intent of this was if somebody had the I Sears buildings that it could be placed as near as 5 feet to the rear lot line but yet we wanted to put some type of area. Erhart: But then this guy with a 5 acre lot can walk in and put a barn I in front of his house and say it's not in the rearyard. When you get a 5 acre lot, it' s going to be difficult. ' Headla : Tim has a point. Dacy: That's why we're proposing a 800 square foot maximum. Like the lot on Highway 7, you're saying it's 5 acres but there was single family lots in Shorewood and this area could be subdivided . Erhart: I 'm just saying , don' t talk about rearyard at all . Headla: The Lawson property, which is the front yard and rear yard? You've got double fronted lots . IOlsen : The street frontage side of the lots are the frontyards. Headla : Well , he' s got two streets . 1 Conrad : Where did the 5 come from? 5 feet from any rear lot line? Olsen: That' s in the ordinance right now. I Conrad : That seems close to any lot line . ' Wildermuth: It seems too close. Conrad : It does and I don ' t like that. ISiegel: I don't see why you'd have a problem with that. Why do you think somebody is going to build their house facing their yard to the rear? Conrad : It' s just 5 feet is this far . IISiegel : Yes but the other guy has 5 feet so you 've got 10 feet. Conrad : The water from the eaves of this barn or roof will hit the Ineighbor ' s property. Dacy: It was consistent with what the older ordinance also. The only Ithing that was new in this was the 30o thing. Trying to establish a maximum area. Erhart: I think a lot of this accessory stuff, I think they're fairly Lcommon. 1 Planning Commission Meeting October 28, 1987 - Page 39 Conrad: Accessory structures are garages right so garages are covered? That's the typical accessory structure that we're talking about now. Is that right? Olsen : Yes and the tool shed. Conrad: So whatever, we have to make sure that whatever restrictions are not really restricting a garage. Siegel: That also says that provided no detached accessory structure shall be placed nearer than 5 feet from any rear lot line. I've got one that's closer than that. It's my pump house for the swimming pool and it doesn't affect my neighbor at all. And I'm sure there are a lot of people on smaller lots who are going to be faced with similar circumstances. If they put in any kind of detached accessory structure. It doesn't say a garage. I guess that's where I'm having problems with that because it says no detached accessory structure because it covers too many possibilities or all the possibilities . Emmings: Permitted accessory uses in RSF, there's garage, storage ' building and there's a bunch of others. Also like a kennel. Those are the kinds of the things that are permitted . Conrad: I originally didn't like the 800 feet thinking that they're t larages but I guess I 'm comfortable with the 800 and I could be persuaded to go up from 800. I guess I'm not really concerned that it fits the character. What I don't want to see is a humongous building out of context in the residential area and I think it sure seems like, whether it be 800 or 1,400, we'll probably rule that out so I don't care which number we pick. Emmings : What would be the sideyard setback on the accessory building? 10 feet? ' Conrad : So , who would like to go along with a larger than 800? Erhart: I would. Is there a typical dimensions for a 3 stall detached ' garage with a little workshop area at one end? Emmings: You've got 12 feet per stall, per car stall and then whatever ' you want for your shop. Erhart: How deep is it? 1 Emmings : 20 is minimum and they are typically 22 or 24 . Erhart: That 's 1,056 feet. ' Conrad : What should we do? Should we round it off to 1, 000? Should 1 we go up to 1,200? ' 1 {' IIPlanning Commission Meeting October 28, 1987 - Page 40 Ilf Siegel : Why not leave it 30%? IConrad: Let ' s leave it at 1, 000. Emmings : Do people want that 30% referred to in there too? Conrad: I don't like the 30%. It's not meaningful to me at all and that was my biggest problem with this whole deal . The 30% does not Imean anything to me. Emmings: Out of 15,000 square foot lot, say half of it was your backyard, is that reasonable? Do you think it would be half of it? IIt certainly wouldn ' t be bigger than that. Erhart: So let's say you go down a lot, say you only have a quarter of Ia backyard, is that reasonable and that ' s 1, 125 square feet. Emmings: So we don ' t really need the 30%. IDacy: It ' s in there for smaller lots . Erhart: What are our smallest lots? IConrad : It ' s 13, 500. IIDacy: There are some existing lots that are 8,000 or 9,000 square feet. IEmmings : Maybe you ought to leave it in for a just in case. Siegel: Yes, I'm really worried with setting any size on it. I'd rather stick with a percentage. We've got too many different sizes of IIlots to try and yield the maximum or even the minimum. Erhart: But if you stick with this percentage and then some guy comes • over with 150 by 20 foot barn. II Conrad : The straight percentage doesn ' t work for me. IOlsen: I think the reason that we have that percentage is just for the benefit of small lots that don ' t have 1, 000 foot . IConrad: Okay, I buy that. Instead of the 800 we can out in the 1,000. We can leave ' the 30% in controlling . . . Olsen: Small lots . IConrad: Right and we'll up the 800 square feet to 1,000 and we'll change the 5 feet from any rear lot line. Obviously I have no support "for by change to 5 feet. II II Planning Commission Meeting October 28 , 1987 - Page 42 Conrad: How do they show, they can't show right? They can't show that it' s not dangerous. Headla : I think it ' s up to them to show that it 's not dangerous . ' Olsen: I'm investigating having some tests done. They are sending me some addresses of labs who can do tests . Headla: Yes but I think the vendor or the manufacturer of that product should be doing the testing and pay for it. I don't think we should spend one penny verifying that. I think it's up to the manufacturer to verify that it is not dangerous. Like this wood, why can't we bury that in the ground? That's prohibited. We have to haul it away. That' s a situation I really get sqwimish . Wildermuth: Rather than take this issue on ourselves, I think we ought ' to be pressing for the EPA or some state agency to look into it . Olsen: They have looked at it and concluded that . . . Headla : Do they list it by product, the manufacturer? Olsen: When we put a boardwalk in, we don't see the type of wood ' that ' s being used . Headla: So somebody really can use just about any type of treated wood? Olsen: Right. It's all treated with three major chemicals that are used in the pressure treated woods and they have not found that they are harmful . Conrad : Are we talking about treated wood that is in the water? We're not talking above ground, we' re talking about below ground? Headla: That was my main concern where people wanted to put in boardwalks over wetlands with treated wood in the water. Conrad: What is the alternative for treated wood? If we don't use treated wood in the wetland . . . ' Headla : Cedar poles , oak poles . They last what , 20 to 30 years . Olsen: Or metal . Conrad : Is that a hardship? Wildermuth: More expensive. Conrad: What typically are we talking about? Are we talking about , ,oardwalks? That's what brought it on was boardwalks through wetlands. I- llPlanning Commission Meeting October 28 , 1987 - Page 43 IWildermuth: Aren' t we just spinning our wheels if we . . . IIConrad: We can' t provide it ' s harmful . Wildermuth : We aren ' t going to be able to point to some State Statute. IOlsen: The EPA said they didn't specifically do, there are 1,000 different combinations . IWildermuth: At this point all we can conclude is there no issue here. Headla: I disagree. I think we should say no treated wood in water I period. Are we going to get our backs against the wall by saying 5 or 10 feet clearance, no way. ISiegel : How are you going to police that though? Headla: I guess the same way you would police the 5 foot. ISiegel : No but how are going to police it as a community? They can go to Eden Prairie and buy their treated wood. You're talking about a bigger question than just what one municipality can do. I think it's Ifine if we alert the concern, if we have one, to the Environmental Protection Agency and maybe it already has been or others should voice fl concern but why should Chanhassen not allow treated wood without the V capabilities of enforcing it? IHeadla: I think you can enforce it. Just remember now we're only saying like putting treated wood posts in the wetlands. When somebody Icomes in to put a boardwalk over the wetlands , that's when we explain to them that they can use treated wood as the actual walkway and everything . You just can ' t put treated wood down into water . ISiegel : That ' s for new construction? Headla : Oh yes . That ' s all we could do . IConrad : At what point in time would we have control on knowing if it was treated wood or not? IOlsen : A lot of those docks we don ' t even know about . Conrad: When would we have an opportunity to tell anybody that we IIdon ' t allow treated wood in the water? Olsen: Like a wetland alteration permit. IConrad: Probably only in the wetland alteration permit process. We say you can't do it. You've got to have a dock or you have to have a uboardwalk. I 11 4 Planning Commission Meeting I October 28 , 1987 - Page 44 ir Siegel: Can we as a community dictate the materials used in such construction? Dacy: That was the issue that we were just discussing. If a national agency and the State has not found whether or not it is harmful , for us to have a basic ordinance or legal justification being reasonable and so on, if that were challenged. Emmings: Meaning the health, safety and public welfare, does it if there ' s not any proven harm? ' Erhart: I think if some agency or some group came out, anybody, even the University or a doctor came out and said treated wood is harmful in water then I think we'd have an excellent, good reason to make this ordinance. Whether or not we could enforce it. Just to make that statement but the fact that no one , if we can't find some even semi- official agency to do that. Headla: What about that treated wood at a construction site? Why can't they? Why can't we bury that right at the construction site? Like right next to your house. Erhart: You' re saying we can ' t do that now? ( Ieadla : Right. Siegel : We can ' t? 1 Emmings: Who says? I'm not arguing with you, I just wonder where does that come from? ' Headla: I knew you were going to ask me that too when I started. I'm going to have to look into it more. Conrad: Here's what I'd like to do. Let's defer this issue Jo Ann at least until Dave can find an agency or somebody saying it's negative or let's look at it in 6 months. In the interim, if we can in the wetland alteration permit process highly recommend that treated wood not be used in contact with water, let's highly recommend it. I don't know how you get that word out but in your contact with them, I think that would be at least some temporary thing . Olsen: It's a hot issue right now and I think it is being investigated . , AMATEUR RADIO TOWERS . , Olsen: I'm essentially saying let's limit it to one radio tower per site. . 1 C tt IIPlanning Commission Meeting October 28, 1987 - Page 45 Emmings : I agree. IConrad: I agree. Erhart : I agree. IHeadla: You can put many antennaes on one tower. I can put a whole bundle, I can put 20 to 30 square feet up on one tower and that's what that one fellow I think he was really angling to do that. I don't know Ithe right wording but I think this really doesn't cut it. I think there's a good way, people can really be imposing on their neighbors if we word it this way. IOlsen: I looked at your concerns. It's really difficult to put all your antennaes because they're so different and varying in sizes and sometimes you they are closed up and then they are extended when Ithey're used. That might be getting more into what the FCC is trying to prevent the cities from doing and allowing them to at least communicate. When you're limiting them to that one tower, it may be Ihard to come up with a maximum size but we can look into it. Headla: I really think that's the way to go. Like 12 feet maximum area . licConrad: It's just all relative It's' It .though Dave. i 9 like is a telephone -I,- pole uglier if it's got 3 wires on it versus 2? The pole is intrusive IIto begin with and that ' s like 90% of the impact and the wire. Headla: Some of those things get pretty obnoxious. IIConrad : I just don ' t know how in the heck you can regulate that. Headla: I don ' t either . IEmmings : To me, isn' t is a separate thing maybe? One thin g we ought ht to do is regulate the number of towers and then maybe we want to go a Istep beyond and regulate what's on it to the extent we're able to but we don't know how to do that so at least this is taking the first step in regulating the number of towers . 1 DEMOLITION DEBRIS DISPOSAL. Olsen : The next one was from City Council , they wanted to have some Icontrol over .demoli.tion debris disposal. I pretty much took a lot of the data from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. IConrad: Yes, it sounded like it was exactly or the way I read it, so what have we done? Why do we need this? Olsen: They don ' t regulate those. I- I Planning Commission Meeting 1 October 28, 1987 - Page 46 Conrad : Those are just recommendations? ' Olsen: No, those are conditions if it' s 15,000 cubic yards of open. ' Conrad : And we ' ve adapted it to a smaller space. Any comments? Emmings: Yes , the key is the permit obviously so you know what's going ' on where and you can regulate it. I think it looks fine. ARCHITECTURAL EXTERIOR STANDARDS. Barbara Dacy presented the staff report on architectural exterior standards. Erhart: It sounds good. I think the thing we have to think about is I think people building industrial plants here are not willing to pay the same kind of price as they would in Eden Prairie. It's just a thought. I think it's a lot easier for us to price ourselves out of industrial jobs. It's a lot easier for us to carried away with Eden Prairie because Eden Prairie has such high minimums. I'm in favor—that we don't find ourselves in the position where we're adversely affected. I'm just saying I don't think we have quite the luxury of Eden Prairie to dictate some of these things . I Conrad: I think it' s okay. LOT WIDTH REQUIREMENTS ON CUL-DE-SACS AND FLAG LOTS . Barbara Dacy stated that she had a presentation that would easily take ' half and hour and asked that this item be tabled until the next meeting . PLANNING COMMISSION GOALS FOR 1987 . Conrad: Point number one on the goals, increase communication between ' Planning Commission and public such as encouraging attendance by reporters from local newspapers, regular articles. How are we doing that? That' s the one I really wanted to focus on. Olsen : We really didn' t start doing much on that until recently. Conrad: What other things will encourage reporters from the paper here? What ' s the strategy and I guess I haven' t hit an objective? Olsen: I think we just wanted to let people know about what was happening before it gets to Council. When a subdivision was approved, let it know that it is in the process . Y i. IPlanning Commission Meeting Npvember 4, 1987 - Page 23 ICbecause it just plain wouldn't get ' 7 P ge used. I think that's a good alternative. 1 Noziska: Have you run some projections on that little sketching that you've got there as far as what that means to Chanhassen in the way of Itaxes and etc .? Tom Hamilton: The building would generate about $6,000.00. Just the one building we're looking at right now. If you increase the uses and II haven't had a chance to talk to the assessors to find out what kind of changes you would put on that property but it would increase the taxes. If I can get the information for you, I'll see if I can talk to ' the assessor. Noziska: All those sorts of things are important parts of I consideration which obviously you have more knowledge of and understanding. 1 OPEN DISCUSSION: LOT WIDTH AND FLAG LOTS . Barbara Dacy presented the staff report on lot widths . IConrad : What do you think? Keep it the same? Noziska: It doesn't seem like there's any consistent guidance out Ithere. It's whatever anybody or any particular community feels is right. I Conrad: I guess I just get the feeling we're not gaining anything by changing the ordinance right now. I Headla: To me we've had several situations where flag lots, it looks liked it was very reasonable. I don't what else the developer could have done. IDacy: One example, or at least I felt that a flag lot was and a variance was deserved was on the Shadowmere subdivision at the end of that cul-de-sac. They had kind of a hammerhead shaped cul-de-sac and Iif they would have built the cul-de-sac and created the lot lines so you could get the 90 feet across , it would have meant a retaining wall of 22 feet in height and x amount of cutting and filling and so on but if they can achieve the same number of lots but do less damage to the Itopography, and the topography I thought in that instance was the best reason to do that. Other examples, there was controversy in the Creek Run subdivision on Yosemite and then we talked a lot about this in the ICentex and Curry Farms development. There are 2 or 3 flag lots along the steep slopes and cul-de-sacs also. The Commission felt that in the Creek Run example that it was pushing a line that he's trying to get an Ladditional lot out of there. I think the Council went along with that too . I ( Planning Commission Meeting , Npvember 4 , 1987 - Page 24 Siegel: Barb, wouldn't you find if you had a standard arc width that 1 you would avoid some of those kind of things just because of the cost of construction? They would have to be planned according to the topograhy of the land and meet the requirements and we wouldn't have to worry about variances for flag lots or that kind of thing. If you had an equal distance arc around a cul-de-sac and wanted to open up them to building odd shaped cul-de-sacs to take full advantage of every square foot of land. Dacy: To me that's another way of enforcing it. You can establish a 40 to 45 foot length along the arc or the curve of the cul-de-sac. You would end up with a 80 foot lot width at the setback line. If you increase that, then your lot width gets bigger. To me that's just another way of saying you have to have 90 feet at the setback. Yes, establishing a distance along the curve of the arc also would eliminate the flag lot option because you're establishing a minimum width at the cul-de-sac and not saying, you could go down to 15 feet and go back out and at the building setback line I am at the 90 foot lot width. While we' re talking about flag lots, should I move onto that? Conrad: We should make a decision on this while we're talking about it. Is there any reason to change? Does anybody want to pursue that? Okay, we' ll keep it. ' Dacy: We're glad we talked about it because a couple developers come in and say this 90 foot thing at the building setback line is ridiculous. You folks are too restrictive but after we called around to other communities, we find that that ' s not the case. Barbara Dacy presented the staff report on flag lots . ' Emmings: Do you have a minimum width? Dacy: Technically right now we're just saying everything has to be 90 feet and you have to abut on the street. If you wanted to you could put a sentence in the subdivision ordinance that said if a flag lot is to be created it shall have a minimum width of x feet but I don't know if you want to get that definitive at this point. Emmings: The only thing is if you're looking at it as preserving your space for future possible street. Is there anything in there about flag lots now, in the zoning ordinance? Dacy: No and not in the subdivision ordinance . 1 Emmings: The thing that comes to my mind, we can sure leave it the way it is and the other thing we might do is just address flag lots in the I ordinance and say we don't like them for these reasons but we recognize there are certain places where they might be appropriate as a variance f and list those things. I think those are real good points that you ; .Dade there. • 1