1f Moon Valley Grant
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7700 Markel Boulevard
POBox 147
Chanhassec,MN55317
Administration
Phone: 9522271100
Fax 952.2271110
Building Inspections
Phone: 95222711BO
Fax 952.227.1190
Engineering
Phone: 952.227.1160
Fax 952.227.1170
Finance
Pho", 952.2271140
Fax: 9522271110
Park & Recreation
Phone: 952.2271120
Fax: 9522271110
Recrealior¡Cellter
2310 Couller Boulevard
Phone: 952.2271400
Fax:9522271404
Planning &
Nalural Resources
Phone: 9522271130
Fax 952.227.1110
Public Works
1591 Park Road
Phone: 952.2271300
Fax: 952.227.1310
SeniorCenler
Phone: 9522271125
Fax 952.227.1110
WebSile
www.ci.chanhassef1.mn.us
~
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Todd Gerhardt, City Manager
FROM:
Kate Aanenson AICP, Community Development Director
DATE:
May 23, 2005
ð~.
SUBJ:
Moon Valley Contamination Clean-up Grant
BACKGROUND
On September 27,2004 the City Council approved the Interim Use Permit for
Moon Valley. The applicant, Pemtom Land Company, is requesting to have the
City support a grant application for the Minnesota Department Of Employment
and Economic Development. A grant request and the resolution for approval are
attached.
ANALYSIS
The grant application was applied for in November but due to limited funds, the
grant was not approved. This application is for the May funding cycle. The
applicant is requesting the maximum amount of $50,000. The City will be the
pass-through agency for the funding. There is a requirement for the City to
provide the 25% match for the grant. This would amount to $12,500 which staff
intends to have a memorandum of understanding with Pemtom Land Company
that the City would be reimbursed for those costs. Staff supports the clean up of
the site and the request for funding.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached resolution for the
funding request.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Location map.
2. Resolution.
3. Grant application.
g:\plan\2004 planning cases\04-27 _ moon valley grave) miae\mOOD valley clean up 05-23~05 cc memo.doc
The City 01 Chanhassen. A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charmir1g downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautilul parks. A great place to live, work, and play
"'".~
Location Map
Moon Valley Contamination
Clean-up Grant
City of Chanhassen
--
\
\
\
\
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
DATE:
Mav 23. 2005
RESOLUTION NO:
MOTION BY:
SECONDED BY:
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CONTAMINATION CLEANUP GRANT APPUCATION
AND coMMITTING LOCAL MATCH AND AUTHORIZING CONTRACT SIGNATURE FOR
MOON V ALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen as follows:
1. That the Chanhassen City Council hereby approves the Contamination Cleanup grant
application to be submitted to the Department of Employment and Economic Development
(DEED), by the City of Chanhassen for the Moon Valley site.
2. That the City of Chanhassen acts as the legal sponsor for project(s) contained in the
Contamination Cleanup Grant Program and that the Mayor and City Manager are hereby
authorized to apply to the Department of Employment and Economic Development for funding
of this project on behalf of the City of Chanhassen.
3. That the City of Chanhassen has the legal authority to apply for financial assistance, and the
institutional, managerial, and financial capability to ensure adequate project administration.
4. That the sources and amounts of the local match identified in the application are committed to
the project identified.
5. That the City of Chanhassen has not violated any Federal, State or local laws pertaining to
fraud, bribery, graft, kickbacks, collusion, conflict of interest or other unlawful or corrupt
practice.
6. That upon approval of its application by the state, the City of Chanhassen may enter into an
agreement with the State of Minnesota for the above-referenced project, and that the City of
Chanhassen certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulation as stated in all
contract agreements.
7. The Mayor and City Manager of the City of Chanhassen are hereby authorized to execute such
agreements as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the applicant.
Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 23rd day of May, 2005.
ATTEST:
Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor
Todd Gerhardt, City Manager
YES
NO
ABSENT
g:\admin\resol\moon valley.doc
FY 04-FY 05
CONTAMINATION INVESTIGATION & RAP DEVELOPMENT GRANT
APPLICATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Instructions
PurposelBackground .... ............ ...... .......,....,....,....,................,.....,........,.. ..,.............. ..... II
Application Deadlines,..........,...................,............ .........,. ...... .........,... ... ......... ............. II
Funding Availability.........,.....,.........,....,.................·········,····,······..·..····,,·········,,·····,···· II
Eligible Costs.........................................,................,..·······,···········,··..,·····················..··· II
Local Match Requirement..,.. ... ..........,.....................,........................ ............ ............ .... II
Eligible Applicants.......,.....,..............,...............,...................... ... ...,.....,.....,..........,.....,m
Quality Site Assessments.."....................,....,............····..·········,·····,·····..················,·····III
Qualifying Sites .,...............,... ............ .................,.....,.....,....,..............."..... .....,....,......m
Grant Award Criteria.......,..............,..........,.................············..··,················,,····,········ III
Application
I. Site Information.......,....,...........................,.····,···········,·····,·······················,···········2
II. Site History ....................,.....,....,....",...,......................,................."....,.................3
III. Contamination Investigati on Information.........,........................····,·····,···········,····3
IV. Cost Analysis ............ ............ ......... ..... ........ ........... ...... ......................... ..... ...........4
Budget.. ...... ......... .."..............,.....,....,.. ..............."...........,...... ....... ... ........ ...... .....,.4
Budget Sources and Uses Table.........................................····..·····..···..····.............4
Financing....,.....,... ... .....,...... ...,.. ...,.. ...............,.....,.....,....., ....., ....... ..... ...... ...." ......4
V, Site Value.....,. ... .,. ........., ... ..,................ .....,........ ....,. ...... ... ......... .... ... ........ ... ...,.....5
VI. Redevelopment Potential.. .."..... ..........,.. ..,..... ......... ...,.....,... .., ... ... ...... .......,....... ..5
Job Creation & Retention......... .......,..... ............,...... .......... .., ....... ...... ..... ..............6
Project Schedule....,..............,..........,.............,....,.....,·····,··················,·····,·····..······ 7
VII. Third Party/Company Commitment Information .................................................8
VIII. Payment Information ...... ...,..... ......... ..,....,.. ....,................... ... .,. ............. ...... ....... ..8
IX. Resolutions...,... ..................,...... ... ..,.. ..,.. ...,.... ... ... ...... ...... ....... ............ .,. ......... .... ..9
Investigation
1
FY04-FY05
Investigation
~I· .y II -.... Empl.,.....
J .... Eco..1c Developmant
lnnesðra
CONTAMINATION INVESTIGATION AND RAP
DEVELOPMENT
GRANT APPLICATION
Cover Page
Applicant: Citv of Chanhassen
Head of Applicant Agency: Communitv Develovment
Applicant Address: 7700 Market Blvd. PO Box 147
City:
Chanhassen. MN
Zip Code: 55317
Project Contact Person: Kate Aanenson
Phone: 952-227-1100
Fax:
952-227-1110
E-mail: kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us
Application Author/Preparer: .Tames S. Aiken. P.G.
Phone: 952_-_346_-_3854
E-mail: iaiken@mccainassociates.com
Department of Employment and Economic Development
"' Metto S,..n .Ul7th Place B....· 8al.' Pnlf JIM 55101·U12 . USA
6S1~297.U'1 . 800-611-3858 . Fas 111-1'1.1190 . TTY/TDDI 611·282·6141 _808.3.'·2901 . ......d.lt.h......
Ao,...I__"......--_...
2
FY 04-FY 05
I. SITE INFORMATION
1. Name of Site: Moon VaUev Gun Ranl!e
Site address: 100 Flvinl! Cloud Drive. PIN: 250360200
City (or Township): Chanhassen County: Carver
Minnesota 2002 Legislative District # _A
34
B
55318
Zip Code
(Note: The Minnesota Legislature has a tool to look up legislative district numbers. You must have
a precise address and know the zip code of the site. Go to:
http://maps.commissions.leg.state.mn.us/website/districts/)
2. Is applicant enrolled in an MPCA Program?
VIC Prog.l.D: 19420 VIC Project Manager_Wayne Sarappo
VPIC Prog. l.D: VPIC Proj.Manager
LUST Prog, I.D: LUST Proj. Manager
Other: VIC Hvdrol!eolol!ist: Amv Hadiaris 651-296-8947
Phone: 651·296·7297
Phone:
Phone:
3. Is the project site publicly or privately owned? Private
Current property owner(s): Beatrice Zweirs dba Moon VaUev Al!l!rel!ates
When was the property purchased? 1986 For what amount? $425.000
Who will own the site during investigation? Beatrice Zwiers dba Moon VaUev Al!l!rel!ates
When was/will the property purchased? NA For what amount? NA
Who will own the site during cleanup? _Beatrice Zwiers dba Moon VaUey
Aggregates
When will the property purchased? NA For what amount? NA
Who will own the site after cleanup?
When will the property purchased?
Zwiers dba Moon VaUev Al!l!rel!ates
NA For what amount? NA
Who will own the project site during development? Pemtom lAnd Companv
When will the property be purchased? 2005-2008 For what amount? $6.000.000 (2008 dollars)
Who will own the project site after development? Individual homeowners.
When will the property be purchased? After 2008 For what amount?
Purchase price dependent on unit - for 250 units on Site with averaee of $200.000 per unit.
purchase price wiU be $200K x 250 = $50 miUion.
4. Name(s) of current environmental consultant and legal counsel if applicable
Consultant James Aiken. P.G. and John McCain. P.E. ( McCain and Associates. Inc.)
Phone: 952-346-3900
Investigation
3
FY 04 - FY 05
Attorney Brian Weisbe1'f? (Skeel. Brill. Greuoner. Duffv & Foster. P.A.)
Phone (612) 337-6100
5. Legal description of the site:
Government Lot 1, excluding 5.95 acres south of northerly right of way for Highway 212/169 in
Section 36, Township 116N, Range 23 West, Carver County.
6. Attach an accurate and legible site and location map that shows: (Aooendix A Fieure 1.2»
a) The current condition of the site including labeled structures; (Aoo A. Fieure 3)
b) The proposed development of the site including labeled structures; and (A. Fieure 4)
c) The suspected location(s) of contamination. (Aoo A. Fieure 5)
See Attachment A - also includes land use and Dlannine maos.
Please attach photographs, in addition to maps, if they are available.
7, Acreage of Site
39.8
Sq, Ft. of Site 1.733.688
8. ZoninglLand use:
A. Current: Industrial_ Commercial Residential
Mixed use Other (specify)X (Al!ricultural)_
The site is currently operated as a mine and former gun range as a non-conforming pre-existing
land use.
B. What is the expected zoning/land use after investigation and cleanup:
Industrial
Mixed Use_
Commercial _ _ Residential
Other (specify)
x
Of the 39.8 acres on the Site, approximately 15 acres will be developed for residential use consisting
of about 225 high-density condominiums or town homes. The remaining 24.8 acres will be reserved
as open space and protected scenic bluff under City Ordinance.
The Site is the cornerstone of a development that will be conducted jointly on several properties
within the overall development plan. The property to the southwest, including portions that are also
owned by Zweirs, has been proposed for commercial/residential development by Pemtom Land
Company (Attachment E). Because this development will likely not be feasible without the Site as its
centerpiece, the overall plan is included, but described separately from the Site in the discussion of
the development plans for the Property.
The total project will be approximately 75 acres, including 43 acres of open land, scenic bluff, and
recreational land use. Of the 32 acres developed, 25 acres will be a mixture of low and high density
housing with 7 acres reserved for integrated officelretail. The total number of residential units will be
375.
9. Current economic condition:
Vacant lot X
Investigation
Developed site_ (explain below)
4
FY 04-FY 05
10. If the site is currently developed with unoccupied buildings, how long have the
buildings been vacant? ADDroximatelv 15 vears
11. Please describe the condition of any buildings on the Site?
Most of the site is undeveloped mine land, several structures related to gun range and mining are still
present:
A. The old house andformer ski chalet was built in 1956 and is dilapidated, structurally failing,
and will need to be abated and demolished
B. Worker trailer in parking lot is dilapidated and will be abated and demolished.
B. Gun range office and firing house are non-domicile shelters with post and 2x4 construction
C. The scale house is a mobile home trailer that can be removed from the site.
D. Fugitive dumping and miscellaneous semi-truck trailers are stored on the Property along US
Highway 212. These areaslbuildings will be included in the investigation and clean up.
12. Please describe how Site redevelopment will spur adjacent development?
The former gun range and mine are currently a source of erosion and blight. The erosion from
the former mine face, the former gun ranges, and various soil stockpiles, is a potentiol risk to
surface water in an ecologically sensitive area (near the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife
Refuge). The bare ground surfaces, abandoned structures, fugitive dumping and debris also
present an eyesore that discourages local development and investment.
The proposed development will include a mixture of affordable and market rate residential
housing that will suppori the local tax base and invigorate both existing business along Flying
Cloud Drive as well as spur investment and jobs to suppori the new residentiol base. The current
and future commercial districts are shown on Figures 6 and 7 of Attachment A. Business in the
adjacent communities of Eden Prairie, Shakopee, and Chaska will also benefit from the influx of
new customers from the residentiol development at the Site.
The residential development on the Property has been proposed as pari of comprehensive mixed
use development including a new business commercial corridor west of the site. The actual
development of the property will not occur until sewer and water are connected at the site,
however, the schedule for sewer and water can be moved up if the clean up is completed sooner. It
is critical that investigation and clean up begin now because the slope restoration and grading of
the site will require at least five years before development can begin. This is because the
engineering estimates call for over 1,000,000 cubic yards of fill to be removed from the site. This
large volume of soil will require at least five years to be trucked off of the site. In order to begin
removing the soil, each area of the site must be investigated and cleaned up. An interim use
permit has been approved by the Chanhassen City Council as the first pari of future development.
Future phases of development cannot be finalized until appropriote approvals are granted by the
City ofChanhassen and the MPCA. A copy of the Interim Use Permit Letter is included as
Attachment B.
II. SITE HISTORY
Investigation
5
FY04-FY05
13. Please attach a brief synopsis on the history and general background of this site. This includes
but is not limited to former uses and occupants of the site, suspected causes of contamination,
etc. Also describe the current condition of the site and include a description of existing
structures and existing occupants of the site.
A summary of the Site history is included in Attachment C.
III. CONTAMINATION INVESTIGATION INFORMATION
14. Current status of the investigation.
A. Is the site enrolled in the MPCA VIC Program? Yes
B. Has a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment been completed?
Yes. A copy is included in Attachment D along with the Preliminary Site Investigation (PSI).
The PSU was conducted to facilitate immediate erosion control on the Upper Mine Slope and
transfer of Outlot G to the City of Chanhassen, and obtain letter of assurance under the VIC
program. Copies of the MPCA letters to MY A and the City of Chanhassen are also included in
Attachment D.
The investigations indicate that several g£I!Lofthe site may be impacted by lead above the Tier
I SRV value of 400 mg/kg. Also, erosion from areas of anticipated high lead concentrations
(e.g. backstop berms) has moved soils down slope. Therefore, extensive sampling will be
required to assess the extent and magnitude of lead contamination. The sandy soils and shallow
groundwater at the downgradient edge of the property also indicate that groundwater and
surface water quality must be assessed. In addition, there are old buildings that may have
asbestos and lead, there are above ground storage tanks, fugitive dumping, several partially
buried drums, and stockpile areas of lime sludge and construction debris that will be
investigated.
If so, attach a copy of the Phase I to this report.
C. Do you have an approved work plan to begin implementation of a Phase II? No
D. Has any of the work plan been implemented? No
E. Please provide copies of any approval and/or comment letters you have received from the MPCA VIe
Program and also provide copies of any reports documenting investigation activities that have been
conducted at the site to date. (See Attachment D)
15. If any soil or water samples have already been collected, briefly summarize the identified contamination
at the site to date (identified compounds, concentration, etc.). Also summarize the objective of the future
planned investigation.
Soil lead concentrations were detected at 680 mg/kg in one sample located near the trap range above the
Tier 1 SRY of 400 mg/kg. Other samples from the northern and eastern edges of the shotfall zone are
below Tier 1 SRY criteria. Future investigation will collect more data from near the firing line of the trap
range, the maximum accumulation zone, the backstop berms of the rifle ranges, and near sedimentation
Investigation
6
FY 04 - FY 05
ponds and basins that collect runoff from these areas. In accordance with MPCA guwelines this will
require over 100 near-surface soil samples for metals parameters.· Up to 10 deep (50 to 100feet) soU
borings are proposed to assess the quality and soil conditions at the final grade elevations proposed for the
development. Groundwater investigation may be required due to evwence of sandy (permeable) soil and
shallow groundwater near the base of the bluff nearest to the Minnesota River WUdlife Refuge.
A goal of the investigation is to assess impact on hUl1lßn health and the environment as well as to define
areas of potentioJ lead and other contamination so that appropriate lead recycling/clean up strategy can be
employed. It is believed that some lead recycling and other metal recovery will be possible in the pistol and
rifle ranges where there is approximately 50% of the soU surface is composed of lead slugs and or bullet
fragments. Another goal of the investigation is to collect sufficiently detaUed data that will allow for cost-
effective sou separation and recycling. Recycling of the lead rather than landfiUing is consistent with
Carver County and SWMCB strategic solid waste management objectives.
The investigation will also provwe information that will be used to guwe excavation and potentiJJl
co"ective actions. Because off-site disposal and on-site stabUization are often utUized for sl1lßll-arms
firing range (SAFR) sites, investigation sample frequency must be sufficient to accurately wentify
contaminated areas and avow treatment and disposal of clean sou. Due to the nature and distribution of
lead discharged at the Trap Range, the potentioJ area of impact is large and there will be a significant
quantity of soil sampling required to reliably assess environmental risk as well as engineering needs.
IV. COST ANALYSIS
BUDGET
16. What are the total investigation and RAP development costs? $122.200
Due to the large area of the site that requires investigation, the total costs of the project are likely to
far exceed the amount of the requested DEED-committed funds. The DEED Grant budget request
has been allocated to the largest portion of the project expense, which is for the Phase 11
Investigation.
17. How much are you requesting from DEED? (This amount cannot exceed $50,000 or 75%
of the total cost, whichever is less.) 50000
UDGET SOURCES & USES
ligible Activities for Date(s) DEED Local Local
nvestigation and RAP % Complete Completed Request + Match # I Match # 2 Total
evelopment mrnIyy 3BD_ + _TBD =
Phase I ESA 100 11/04 0 0 0 4.000
Preliminary Site Investigation 100 10/6/04 0 0 0 15,000
Phase II Work Plan 20 0 0 0 5,000
II ~ .11 mð ~OO
wner-funded Phase II Remainder 0 0 0 0 28,500
SIRAP Development 0 0 0 0 7,200
Total- Investigation & RAP Development: $t22.200
18. Are any costs listed in this budget eligible for funding from other funding sources?
Yes
Investigation
7
FY 04-FY 05
19. If any of the activities listed above are partially or fully completed, how were those activities
financed?
The preliminary site investigation and Phase I ESA were financed directly by the Properly owner
(Zwiers) in order to initiate filling of the Upper Mine Slope and donaJion of Outlot G to the City of
Chanhassen.
FINANCING
20. Please submit an audit, or financial statement if an audit is not available, from the municipality in
which the site is located. Audit informaJion has been provided to DEED from the City of
Chanhassen.
21. Is there a possibility that the site will be cleaned up without DEED money? _X_ Yes _ No
Explain your above yes or no answer.
Eventually the site will be developed, but without some funding the site is likely to continue to
languish. The location and proximity to the Metro area would suggest that the Site would eventually
be developed because of the location and the eventual addition of sewer and water service. However,
the contaminaJion and amount of earthwork required presents a significant economic barrier to
development. The properly owner has agreed to conduct investigaJion and clean up actions that are
economically justified for the Site. As with many properties, the minimum cost threshold for
investigaJion and clean up is to remediate soil down to levels consistent with the current land use. In
this case, the current land use is essentially industrial due to the pre-existing (non-conforming) use as
a mine pit/gun range. An industrial/commercial level of clean up would not be suitable for
residential land use and the proposed development plan.
With the DEED grant, the investigation and clean up can be expanded to accommodate a land use
and development plan that will have a significant positive environmental, societal, and economic
impact for the community. Without DEED assistance, there are barriers to development that may
defer development into the next decade and result in less desirable land use and/or less favorable
development plans.
V. SITE VALUE
22. What is the current assessed value of the site? $ 818.000
23. What is the estimated assessed value of the site should contamination be found and
remediation completed? $ 818.000
There is no available evidence that the current assessed value includes a reduction for environmental
impairment.
What is the estimated assessed value of the site after redevelopment? $ $6,000.000
A. How were these figures determined? Current data from the Carver County Assessor's Office;
the purchase offer price from Pemtom Land Company is assumed to be the developed site value in the
first year after redevelopment. After that, the sold units will contribute to the total taxable properly
Investigation
8
FY 04 - FY 05
base.
B. Who determined them? Comoiled bv James Aiken (McCain) from the sources indicated
above.
VI. REDEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL
24. Explain the likely use of the site after investigation and cleanup.
The Property is a key piece of a broader development strategy proposed for the U.S. Highway 212
corridor along the Minnesota River. Since the development plan is predicated upon the availabüiJy
of the Property for development, the financial aspects for the entire project as well as the Site are
described herein. The land use on the Site will be high- densiJy residential, the larger project will be
mixed use with residential and office/retail opportunities. The overall project will be modeled after
the existing Hennepin Village project by the same developer and located in Eden Prairie. Key
elements wül include a diverse mixture of affordable and market housing combined into a transit
friendly, affordable communiJy along a major collector road.
A unique element of the development (particularly at the Site) wül be the availability of affordable
housing in a bluff view setting that is that is typically only available to the upper-end market.
Additionally, the proximiJy to the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge wül provide a well-
connected wild life habitat corridor and recreatianal opportunities. The Property will actually
increase the acreage of undeveloped scenic bluff property, and connect the Richard T. Anderson
Conservation Area to the east to the LRT/Regional Trail and Outlot G of the Settler's West
Subdivision to the north. The proximiJy to these highly desirable natural features provides significant
investment incentive for business to support the development.
The Site itself would be the residential anchor of the development with approximately 15 developable
acres and about 225 units.
25. If the site will be redeveloped for residential use, provide the following data:
TOTAL # OF RENTAL UNITS TO BE DEVELOPED
Monthly rental cost per unit $
Number of affordable units
Construction cost per unit $
Current market for rental units indicates that this will not be a primary goal of the project.
TOTAL # OF OWNER-OCCUPIED UNITS TO BE DEVELOPED 225 (on Site) 375 (total)
Purchase price per unit/home $175.000 $300.000
Number of affordable unitslhomes 34 @ $175.000 to $193.700
Construction cost per unit: $145.000 to $220,000 (Average)
* Housing developments should include an affordability component According to Met Council (Guy
Peterson), homes that cost $193,700 or less in 2004 were considered "affordable." The CiJy of
Investigation
9
~
FY04-FY05
Chanhassen also has other development areas that meet this affordability component.
26. What are the current property taxes on the site? $16.636
27. What are the projected property taxes for the site when the site is cleaned and developed?
According to the Caner County Auditor's Office (952)-361-1960 estimated that the 2004 property tax
on a $220,000 homesteaded property located at the Site would be $3080 per unit.
Assuming that there would be 225 units on site the tax would be $693,000. The increase in property
tax revenue would be about $675,000 per year. For the entire project, the property tax revenue would
be $1,155,000.
JOB CREATION & RETENTION
28. Project the number of new full-time jobs that will be created after cleanup and development of the
site. Total New Jobs: On Site: 0 Total develoDment: 29
The Site will be used for residential, so there is nojob creation anticipated on Site. However, as
previously noted, the Site is the centerpiece of a larger development plan that will create new jobs and
business opportunity. Using the Hennepin Village development (Attachment E) as a guide, the
development might include a gaslconvenience store, three general retail businesses, a retail/medical
office, a bank branch office, and a fast food restaurant. The following assume that 1 full time and
three to four part-time positions are created for each operation. Additional staffing needs are not
included as these positions may be filled with transfers from other locations.
NEW JOBS TABLE
Position Title Total # of Total # of Part- Annual Wage Expected
Full-Time Time Jobs per Job Hiring Date
Jobs
RetaiVOffice 3 9 40,000 2009
Medical Office 1 3 50,000 2009
Bank 1 3 45,000 2009
Gas/Convenience 1 3 35,000 2009
Fast Food 1 4 35,000 2009
29. State the number of full-time jobs that will be retained as a direct result of this site's development?
Total Retained Jobs: _NA
No local businesses will move to the Site, however, specific businesses currently within 1 mile would
enjoy immediate benefit from the development include:
Lions Tap Family Restaurant - Flying Cloud Drive, Eden Prairie
Investigation
10
FY 04-FY 05
Halla Nursery - 10,000 Great Plains Blvd, Chanhassen
Halla Golf Course - Opening June 2005 at Pioneer Trail and 101
Golf Zone - 825 Flying Cloud Drive, Chanhassen
Green Gardens Landscaping - 826 Flying Cloud Dr.
Nearby commercial districts likely to also see business from the Site:
Eden Prairie
Chanhassen
Shakopee
Chaska
Investigation
11
-d
"
:g
~
u
'"
.~
<=
0
.~
.~
-
'"
"
>
.5
-d
"
'"
0
8'
P-
"
-5
-'=
u
:E
~
.5
~
'"
~
l;j
"
»
-d
§
~
'"
~
-'=
-
§
E
"
-'=
-
bO
.5
-
u
'6
.5
"
:î
-d
"
-'=
u
'"
bO
<=
¡..¡ .~
5 0
~
~
~ ..a
¡..¡ "
= -'=
u -
rJ:J B
v; "
0 Eo< }
G: u
I ¡..¡ 0
..,. 0 u
0
G: ~ 0
(")
^
... ^
^
,. ..
..
n ..
..
.... '" ..
..
8 ..
N I...
~ ..
I~ ..
w ..
>- I~ ..
..
15 ..
..
... ..
..
5 =
n ;<
~ ..
..
... =
I.,. ..
..
10 ..
..
1M ..
..
I... ..
:g ..
C> ~ ..
N ..
~ ~ =
W
>- :I =
... ~
:I ..
~
ILL
I-
I...
.,
" ..
!S
'" g
I g ..
... !S
..
I~ 1 !S
I- I g
151 ..
II) ..
C>
C> ..
N ..
a: I... ..
c(
W ÕÕ
>- c
0 c d. .28
:;:: 0
~ i õ:g =N
C ~ C o~
.g c 0 ....
-;¡ co 1: .. = ...- -co
¡;: c'"
c( ~ -;¡ ~ § S co E 0..
III ... ~ c cel >::
~ w .5 ~ .. 0 .. " co
0 a: o~
III .. := .5 = ;¡ e .- c ~1i
c( .. .. .. > I~ ôj..
I- .. III ~ .. .!: Š§ -"
co ~ .. iñ .. 00
.c co e ~
II- .. .c II- '2 "0 -.c
co c( ..- co~
c .c .. II- a: a:~ ¡;..
¡¡ II- .. co
co a: ~.!: e ~
! .c ...-
II- III a:~
II- ~ã
"
J:
I-
Z
o
:::¡;
o
~
~
w
>
~
U)
~
U)
<t
I-
o
W
..J
::I
o
W
J:
o
U)
N
-
In
=
=
N
....
»
-
=
1
~
"CI
<=
Q
.-
...
...
-
P-
ë c
Q 0
'" -
.
~ .~
~ "
>
.s
i
FY 04-FY 05
VII. THIRD PARTY/COMPANY COMMITMENT INFORMA nON
31, If there is a commitment from a third party to develop on the site, please complete the following:
Third Party/Company Name: Pemtom Land Comvanv
Contact Person: Mr. Dan Herbst
Title: President
Phone Number (include area code): 952
/
937
/
0716
32. Please attach a commitment letter from the developer or attach other commitment documentation.
(If you cannot obtain a commitment letter from the developer, please explain.) (Attachment E)
VIII. PAYMENT INFORMATION
33. List below the appropriate information to indicate where grant payments should be made.
Mailing Address~
7700 Market Blvd PO Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317
952-227-1100
Contact Person: Kate Aanenson
E-mail address:kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us
Telephone Number (include area code): 952-227-1100
Fax Number (include area code): Fax: 952-227-1110
Minnesota Identification Number: 9390134
State of Minnesota vendor number None
Federal Employer Identification Number: 41-885331
Investigation
13
FY 04 - FY 05
IX. RESOLUTIONS
34. Resolutions must be adopted prior to submission of the application package. The two required
elements are:
L A resolution from the governing body of the city where the project site is
located, which approves the application.
2, A resolution from the applicant committing to the local match and authorizing
contract signatures. (Note: pursuant to M.S. 412.201, Statutory Cities must
authorize both the Mayor and Clerk to execute all contracts.)
An applicant may either provide a separate resolution for each of the above, or combine them into a
single resolution, as long as they include the same elements.
Blank resolutions are included as examples for your convenience. You may choose to reformat them,
but make sure to include all of the statements that appear in our examples. (See Attachment F)
Investigation
14