Loading...
2014-78CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: November 24, 2014 MOTION BY: Ernst RESOLUTION NO: 2014 -78 SECONDED BY: McDonald A RESOLUTION APPROVING A METES AND BOUNDS SUBDIVISION CREATING TWO PARCELS AT 2061 WEST 65TH STREET WHEREAS, John J and Kimberly E. Corey have requested a subdivision of the property into two lots of 15,165 square feet and 15,159 square feet, and WHEREAS, the Chanhassen City Council held a public hearing on November 24, 2014, and found the plan consistent with the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan and Zoning ordinance NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council hereby approves the metes and bounds subdivision of 2061 West 65 rd Street (Planning Case #2014 -30) for John J and Kimberly E. Corey for property legally described as Lot 3, Block 2, Moline's Addition, Carver County, Minnesota, subject to the following conditions. Buildma The existing structure on proposed Parcel 2 must be provided with sanitary sewer connection — permit required 2 Properties must be provided with separate sewer and water services 3 Existing Subsurface Sewage Treatment Site on proposed Parcel 1 must be properly discontinued and abandoned — permit required Engineermg The City Attorney shall draft and the developer shall execute a "Grant of Permanent Easement for Public Drainage and Utility Purposes" document This document shall be recorded with the metes and bounds subdivision. 2. A roadway, drainage and utility easement must be dedicated over the portion of the existing cul -de -sac within the property and 15 feet beyond the edge of the road 3. Prior to recording the subdivision the developer shall pay the $45 GIS fee. $25 (subdivision) plus $10 /parcel. 4 Prior to recording the subdivision a $10,000 security must be provided to ensure that the street is restored The security can be released when the city determines that the patch is in good condition after one freeze -thaw cycle Sewer and water hookup charges are due for the new lot, a portion of which shall be collected before the metes and bounds subdivision is recorded- Water- 1 unit x $1,886 /unit = $1,886 Sewer- 1 unit x $664 /unit = $664 6. If the final subdivision submittals are received after 2014, all fees shall be recalculated based on the rates in effect at that time 7. The remaining 70% of the sanitary sewer and water hookup fees must be paid with the building permit at the rate in effect at that time A plumbing permit is required for the private storm sewer, the plumbing inspector will inspect the connection to the city storm sewer manhole. 9 On Parcel 1, the proposed home style as required by City Code Section 18 -40 (4) 2 (iii) is a slab -on -grade home Based on Interstate Geotechmcal Engineering's observations, the groundwater elevation is 1 8 feet below the ground elevation of the soil boring. The developer must verify the surface elevation of the boring location to determine the elevation of the groundwater, the lowest floor must be minimum three feet above that elevation per City Code Section 18 -40 (4) 2 (1). Environmental Resource S ecp ialist 1. Tree protection fencing will be required around any preserved trees. It shall be installed prior to grading and located at the drip lines of the trees 2. Parcel 1 is required to have one tree planted in the front yard. Parks 1. Park fees of $5,800 00 shall be paid for each new single- family lot prior to the recording of the property deed. Planning Deeds shall submitted to the city for review and recorded at Carver County for the two parcels 2 A building permit shall not be issued unless all soil corrections have been completed as indicated in the attached exhibits titled "Subsurface Soil Investigation" dated October 25, 2014 and November 13, 2014 2 Water Resource Coordinator 1. Total surface water management fees due prior to recording the property deed are $1,914 55 Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 24th day November of 2014 ATTEST: c� Todd Gerhardt, City Clerk/Manager YES Furlong Ernst Laufenburger McDonald Tjornhom NO None 3 Thomas A Furlong, Mayor ABSENT None Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc Patrick J Hines, PE 8167 100' st s Cottage Grove MN 55016 (612) 414 -5770 25 October 2014 Mr James Rudos 14846 Timber Hill Road Minnetonka MN 55345 Re; Subsurface Soil Investigation Proposed Single Family Residence W of 2061 W 65t'' St, Chanhassen, Minn CITYDFCHANHASSEt RECEIVED NOV 0 4 2014 041W, SE N PLANNING oEpT In accordance with your authorization, I have completed the above referenced investigation to determine site suitability for the proposed construction A summary of my findings together with boring logs and my conclusions and recommendations are presented in the enclosed report. I found, as you already have been briefed, more than usual problems with the site There is a total of 53/4° & 6'/4 at the locations of Boring 1 & Probe IA, respectively, of unsuitable soil in the form of topsoil fill, general and varying fill, and buried original humus Below at first is a low sand content lean clay, generally dark in color, saturated, very soft to soft (w/ depth). It is "normally consolidated" (consolidated enough to only support its own weight, not additional weight of fill soils or structures above). The overburdening fill has not been inplace long enough to force further consolidation. The moisture content test in this material indicated nearly 42 %, high for a lean clay. This material extends only from 53/4' to 7' in Boring 1, but from 6'/4' to 83/2' in Probe IA. The first 9'° of this material in Probe IA is very soft and is a borderline marl material. All of the aforementioned materials are unsuitable for structure support should be removed. I do acknowledge that excavators are often reluctant to excavate further once the buried organic soil is cleared, so understandings should be inplace at the time of gathering bids. Base soil below at first is a lean clay, a little sandy, dark gray, saturated, rather soft to medium. It has inclusions of a poorly graded (biased finer grained) sand with a few fines, also dark gray, saturated, loose to firm. Deepest soil, commencing at I Pin Boring 1, is a lean clay, rather sandy, dark gray, low gravel content, medium. Theses materials are glacial till. The sand inclusions in the upper portion are glacial outwash. All of these base mineral soils are suitable for residential construction, with conditions. Refusal to auger advancement was not encountered by boring termination depth of 23', indicating lack of bedrock to this level. Very importantly, groundwater was found in the main Boring at 1.8' (elev 96'/4 ±). It is aquifer groundwater, but marginally so. It appears to be contained primarily in the sand inclusions at 7'+ But it also is coming from the upper soft and very soft clay, possibly from SCANNED Mr James Rudos 25 October 2014 Page 2 the lower organic soil. Proper construction on the site (removing the softer lean clay, promoting good site drainage) will mitigate some of this. Thus, water found presently can be regarded as a maximum level. Slab grade of the proposed residence should be set in accordance with City requirements utilizing this level I recommend complete removal of all unsuitable soil which is likely to be the fall and buned organic soil as encountered plus the overly soft clay found in both the boring and probe. Whale this amounts only to another 11/4 in the vicinity of Boring 1, it is another 2'+ in the vicinity of Probe lA As indicated, excavators may be reluctant to excavate below organic soil level, but it is necessary (see longer discussion in the report) It is so important that full time inspection of the excavation by a soils engineer may be necessary Of course, other zones of unsuitable soil not represented by the boring and probe could stall be encountered due to the nature of small volume random sampling. Any other depths or zones of unsuitable soil should be removed as well. You could lower footings somewhat so that you have to provide less oversizing and not stray onto the neighbor's property. But footings here should not be lowered so much as to rest directly upon the suitable base soil as it is only marginally suitable. You need a little fall (2' is recommended) to spread footing loads out with depth. Footings maybe generally designed allowing the usual 2000 psf foundation bearing capacity, which will likely result in normal strip or pad footings. Special attention is again drawn to the advisory that excavations be examined by the Soils Engineer to verify soil boring results and to document adequacy of site preparation Again this is very important as how much soft/very soft clay must be removed will require a high degree of field judgment. Fill, as used, should be tested for compaction adequacy Soil correction should not be abated below slabs in any manner (ie, do not let the excavator try to "trench around" slab areas). Thank you for the opportunity to have been of service. If you have any questions on this, or if I can be of assistance in any additional capacity, do not hesitate to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, RSTATE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, Inc atrick J Hines, President enclosures pH /SC f - SOIL BORING LOG Patrick J Hines, PE 8167 100th St S 1 Cottage Grove MN 55016 f FrQposed Single Family Residence PROJECT West of 2061 W .65th St Chanhassen, Minn LOG OF BORING NO. - SURFACE ELEVATION- IN SAMPL): LAB OTHER TESTS IN GEOLOGY 1"! 1A/B i FS €T DESCRIFTIONAI DCLA,SSIFICATIOW L I 5.75 1 10 TYPE R W DE. P,L set ue LEAN CLAY, variably sandy, Organic (OL Topsoil - Black, w/ tr s mineral Soil, Fill N 1 Iii' 1 very moist, loose to firm LEAN CLAY, somewhat sandy, Pred Dark Gray (CZ) Fill ' J' W/ aa. little Organic Soil, w/ tr grave (elev X32 HA kwist to very moist, loose to fiYm 3 LEAN CLAY, rather silty, Organic (OL) Buried 3 HA Lborderline small roots, tr's - undecom- Humus 4 getation, saturated, rather I Sapric Peat in soft I I 5 rtion sl lighter, less organic, w/ depth 5 LEAN CLAY, a little sandy, Very Dark- ar to Lacustrine Y 4 HA 41.9 t Dark Gray (CL), very soft_ to safe (w/ Deposit �` v `I' I < _ de th 7j , ' , poor 1 gra r: pre one gr, w Glacial med, t�r c�s), w/ a few fines, Dark Gray Till, w/ Y 5' 8/13 (SP), saturated, loose to firm Outwash Y 6 FA 25.6 banded w/ LEAN CLAY, a little sandy, inclusion Dark Gray (CL), saturated, rather soft soft to medium @ 8P+ more bands of clay, less of sand, w/ depth (LEAN CLAY, rather sandy, Dark Gray I 12 (CL), w/ a little gravel i saturated, medium 13J 14 15 16-' 17 18 19 20 21, WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS DATE i1A0 SJ6i�6i�LED CJSiMG ,1 DEPTH }i D£rTT}ti G4VE IN D£PTN DRILLING M, LEVE 23 Oct 16:29 7 ' None 24 Oct 13:51 5® 14:35 to 23' 64' oo` o0 4 -15:20 {{ 511' f Glacial N 1 7 I FA Till N 1 8 1 FA SW DRILLING DATA I i tph± BreeJ ly Clear, 70 °F ±, Calm I I W A TE;t LEVEL Crew Chief pH 1 3.8' method 3" Hand & 4" Power Fli ht* Augers *Mobile B -31 Drill Rig on Dodge Power Wagon 3J1 Coml�enced: 23 Octo er 2.1' Boring Ccrnpleted 24 October 2014 8011, BORING LOG r (continued) 816-, 100th St S. � �� � � Cott"g® rrmia 15 95016 Proposed Single Family Residence PROJECT: West of 2061 65th St, Chanhassen, Minn LOG OF BORING NO: 1 DEPTH SURFACE ELEVATION: 98.1 SAMPLE LAS & OTHER TESTS IN GEOLOGY N W8 L L FEET DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION TYPE R 1AS OE P L. LEAN CLAY, rather sandy, Dark Gray (Cl;, Glacial N 9 FA 22 w/ tr to a little gravel Till saturated, medium 23 _.... End of Boring - No Refusal Bore hole void backfilled w/ native 25 cuttings mixed w/ Bentonite on 24 October 2014 26 27 _ Probe 1A - Elev = 97.8 2 e 0 -6V Topsoil Fill, Fill: (Sri less 29 than Boring 1), Buried Humus Ie= 6k' -7' Lean Clay, possibly ,Marl,' - 30 Gray, saturated, very soft j 7' -8j' FLean Clay, rather silty, Dark -31 ff 'p<<GrEry, saturated, V_ery soft to soft W -10$' Lean Clays w/ band inclusions, 32 _ 'Dar;k GYay, saturated, soft to medium 33 Probe put down by power flight auger method on 24 October 2014 & ummed -4' 34 ately backfilled w/ native cuttings mixed w/ Bentonite 35 I t 36 I 37 i 38 i 39 I 4 s 41 42 43 I 441 I 451 I 46 i i ti 4 t - K- Probe 1A Elev = 9' P -331 Boring No 1 Elev = 98. 1. W 66th Street q BENCH MARS:: Top nut of fire I' hydrant on south side of street, approx on east line extended ..of' "parent" lot; Eld- 100.00 (ry) LOCATIONS OF Patrick J Hines, PE SOIL BORINGS - 81.67 100,01 St. 8 Qgttage ^Grovi MN 55C46 SCALE 1PP = 20' DRAWN BY pH oATE: 24 Oct 2014 Proposed Single 1[612) -41A-'57-7-0. Family Residence West of 2061 W 66th Street Chanhassen, Minnesota Client: James Rudos Minnetonka, Minn PROM : INTERSTATE GEOTECHNICRL ENG PHONE NO. ` 651 769 2467 Interritate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc Patrick I Hines, ]Pl, 8167100V St 5 Cotta G Grove MN 55016 (612)414 -5770 13 November 2014 Mr lames Rudos 14846 Tunberhill Road Minnetonka MI\T 55345 - Ro: Subsurface Sail Investiption Proposed Single Family Residence W of 2061 W 65th St, Chanhassen, Minn Nov. 13 2014 11 :05RM P2 This is in response to your contact of recent regarchn,g groundwater On this project, As you know, I investigated the lot last month and issued a report dated 25 October 2014.1 found a total of 7 & 8'/,' of unsuitable soil at the locations ofBotixig 1 & Probe 1A, respectively, in the farm of topsoil fill, general and varying fill, buried original humus and overly soft clay or marl. First suitable base soil is a loose to 6= sand or a soft to medium lean clay. I rocomme>nded r. emoving these materials and placing controlled fill, noting that you will have to seriously control groundwater in the process. Regarding groundwater, I found it very high on this site - at a stabilized level of 1.8'. As I undo -stand it, The City of Chanhassen has asked if this water level will change as a result of site correction. I used as a stabilized water level the 1.8' found a flay after the hand auger phase was completed. I had enoDuntered water while &filling and did achieve the base granular soil that first day. When I did the power auger phase, water was e reepping up to nearly the same level a few hours later, so I felt that tbo 1.8' is valid I believe that, when you correct this lot, controlling groundwater, and compacting fill, most likely gmular, the groundwaterwill. soon rebound to its original level - 1.8' as found in my boring. If you construct ordinary and good site drainage on your finished project, groundwater will not be affected by any artificial recharge the result of your activities If you have any additional questions on this, or if I can be of assistance in tiny additional acity, do not hesitate to contact me at your convenience. sincerely, INTERSTATE GEQTECHNI RING, Inc �; 1p�°?��E�°� tSp� CI�iC�"t'�!0�$ �Jr4 ' *ra �j i:'�.� - =i :4l. h6i'; 0." L1 ID'U, Palm DIPS T JA C fl''A A 1': Y LICUU' i-D PROFFS810NAL Patrick J Hines, P t'*! tzar dEE -� i 3l.' "; ; i i t; t F i i i� 8`!°AT Q 1v9I1�t ES'JTA �`- $TRTE President ., r Or � H /SC � ° C}�,7E„ Arica '(Y MINNESOTA OTA REG, NO, � 6iri p �_ ? ®N A'k - _.tea