The URL can be used to link to this page

A-2. Surface Water Management Plan UpdateEngineering MEMORANDUM CITY OF TO: Paul Oehme, P.E., Public Works Director /City Engineer CHMNSENFROM: Terry Jeffery, Water Resources Coordinator 7700 Market Boulevard AV Po Box 147 DATE: January 26, 2015 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Fax: 952.227.1110 SUBJ: Surface Water Management Plan Update Administration 1. Plan purpose; Phone: 952.227.1100 2. Water resource management related agreements; Fax 952.227.1110 With the Riley- Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District's adoption of the rules in Building Inspections August of 2014, all four watershed organizations have completed their local water Phone: 952.227.1180 management plan (LWMP) updates. Under Minnesota Statute we are required to Fax: 952.227.1190 update our plan to be consistent with the various organization LWMPs. Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 In anticipation of this, staff began working with Wenck Associates to update our Fax 952.227.1170 Surface Water Management Plan. Minnesota Rules Chapter 8410 dictates what must be included in a local water management plan. These minimum required elements Finance include: Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 1. Plan purpose; Park & Recreation 2. Water resource management related agreements; Phone: 952.227.1120 3. Land and water resource inventory; Fax: 952.227.1110 4. Establishment of policies and goals; Recreation Center 5. Assessment of problems; 2310 Coulter Boulevard 6. Corrective actions; Phone: 952.227.1400 7. Financial considerations; Fax: 952.227.1404 8. Implementation priorities; Planning & 9. Implementation program; and Natural Resources 10. Amendment procedures. Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Many of these elements will remain relatively consistent with the two previous plans. Public Works Some of the elements, such as land and water resources inventory, are continuously 7901 Park Place being updated as land uses change. We have recently updated our hydrologic model Phone: 952.227.1300 for the entire City of Chanhassen. This, in addition to real time observations of Fax: 952.227.1310 systems operations during key storm events, will be used to help identify and assess Senior Center problems. Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Our next step is to begin review of the current policies and goals and update as Website necessary. Staff will meet with the Environmental Commission in February to go www.ci.chanhassen.w.us over the existing policies and goals, offer suggestions for revisions and schedule an open house to open a dialogue with residents and stakeholder groups. G:\ENG \Terry \Surface Water Management\2014 SWMPg3 Update\ Meetings \MEM0 _Citycouncil_012615.doex Chanhassen is a Community for Life. Providing forTodayand Planning for Tomorrow A -c�-- Paul Oehme Surface Water Management Plan Update January 26, 2015 Page 2 Concurrent with this, staff will begin updating the implementation program; specifically, local controls that will need to be revised as part of the plan update. Attached to this memorandum you will find a spreadsheet comparing the various watershed rules and our existing code. The items in red are areas where we are inconsistent with other organizations and would therefore need to be updated or deferred to the watershed. The next section of this report will be dedicated to summarizing the watershed organization rules and anticipated code changes. PLAN UPDATE IMPLICATIONS TO LOCAL CONTROLS FLOODPLAIN PROTECTION Our code was first adopted in 1986 and was based upon the 1979 Flood Insurance Rate maps (FIRM). Currently the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is updating the FIRM maps but should not alter our overlay district. The only anticipated change to current ordinance will be to require mitigation for any reduction of storage volume within floodplain areas. EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL Executive Summary: Minor amendment to address topsoil definition and application responsibility. In the current form of Section 19 -147 of Chanhassen Code, it is consistent with all other rules. Staff is reviewing the current top soil requirement as there is some ambiguity as to what constitutes "topsoil' and how to assure compliance. Staff are frequently contacted by homeowners who are finding that their sod is growing immediately atop compacted clay. This results in an increase in surface ponding, a decrease in rooting depth, a decreased likelihood of successful turf establishment, an increase in fertilizer application and an increase in irrigation frequency and duration. All of this results in an increased demand for potable water for irrigation and an increase in runoff of surface water and the pollutants the runoff carries. This is not an issue unique to Chanhassen as numerous other communities have developed, or are in the process of developing a specification for top soil. WETLAND AND CREEK BUFFERS Executive Summary: Significant discrepancies in buffer width requirements between four agencies with applicable rules. Must determine whether to change rule to comply with all districts, as many as practicable or leave as is and defer to districts. This regulatory control has the widest disparity between entities and may prove impossible to reconcile. It has long been the practice of Chanhassen to maintain local control to provide a GdENG \Teny\Surface Water Management\2014 SWMPg3 UpdateVNeetings\ MEM0 _Citycouncil_012615_rev.docx Paul Oehme Surface Water Management Plan Update January 26, 2015 Page 3 central location for residents, developers and consultants to come to ask questions and procure permits. Staff is recommending reviewing how setbacks are applied in an effort to bring buffer rules into compliance with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, but not adopting the Riley - Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District ( RPBCWD) rules as they are beyond what is required by any other agency. This would require certain groups and individuals to go to RPBCWD for permit acquisition. The bar graph in figure 1 shows a scaled representation of the various buffer requirements of the agencies with jurisdiction in Chanhassen. The Lower Minnesota River Watershed District has not adopted any rules. Watershed districts do not require setbacks while cities do as there are development implications to not requiring setbacks. The biggest concern with not having a setback is the expectation that a secondary structure such as a deck or patio can be installed. If the house is constructed at the buffer edge, then the opportunity to install a secondary structure is no longer present. Chanhassen setbacks are 30 or 40 feet and secondary structures may encroach 50% into the setback. cnum. >ewz STgVCfVRC:R MN CE LNMMASSW 3 SipVCiW I v ry' M1WIAGE $ di4[x %AIWTCRx RIF/Vp.hf1.30' AYG.60' CNAHSCTC/.CR:4-- R CX/.MMdSCHt Sl11W WS:R MgNAEE 3 RoBtvD.r.W.ro' r.rc:to' CREEKS reacvo Figure 1. Buffer Comparison of Jurisdictional Agencies DREDGING AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL Executive Summary: Not currently codified and no changes expected. As these are generally regulated by the DNR and the PCA, Chanhassen does not oversee these activities. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has had a dredging rule in effect for some time G:\ENG \Terry \Surface Water Management\2014 SWMPg3 UpdateWeetingsN4EMO _CityCouncil_012615_rev.docx Paul Oehme Surface Water Management Plan Update January 26, 2015 Page 4 now and has administered this permit with no apparent issue. Given this, staff does not recommend adding dredging and sediment removal to our local controls. SHORELINE AND STREAMBANK STABILIZATION Executive Summary: Currently addressed through zoning permits. No changes to code anticipated. As these are generally regulated by the DNR and the watersheds, Chanhassen does not oversee these activities aside from requiring a zoning permit to assure that there is no conflict with utilities. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has had a shoreline stabilization rule in effect for some time now and has administered this permit with no apparent issue. Given this, staff does not recommend adding shoreline stabilization to our local controls. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Executive Summary: A complete re -write of stormwater management rules are forthcoming. This will address the requirements of the watershed districts as well as the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System permit. There will be significant modifications to the stormwater management code and design standards. These are found primarily in Chapter 19 but are referenced elsewhere. These modifications are not only a result of changes to watershed plans but changes to the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System/State Disposal System — Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Permit (MS4). The primary focus of these changes will be to incorporate volume control into the standards and to provide credit to utility fees for compliance with the rule changes. NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM — MS4 PERMIT In addition to updating our Surface Water Management Plan, we will be updating our Surface Water Pollution Prevention Plan for our Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Permit. The SWPPP is divided into six minimum control measures (MCM). These are broad categories intended to address the protection and improvement of surface waters. The following outline shows a summary of the required elements in each minimum control measure. Many of the minimum control measures are already in place and have been implemented and will require only minor changes. Other items, such as MCM 4 and MCM 5 are equivalent to the Erosion Prevention/Sediment Control and Storm Water Management Rules respectively. But many of the standard operating procedures for inventory, assessment, response and enforcement will need to be updated or developed. GAENG \Terry \Surface Water Management\2014 SWMPg3 Update\ MeetingsWEMO _CityCouncil_012615_rev.docx Paul Oehme Surface Water Management Plan Update January 26, 2015 Page 5 MCM 1 — PUBLIC EDUCATION & OUTREACH Implementation plan Target audiences — with measurable goals for each audience Responsible person Specific activities & schedules Description of coordination with other entities & programs MCM 2 — PUBLIC PARTICIPATION & INVOLVEMENT MCM 3 - IDDE Regulatory Mechanism — that effectively prohibits non- stormwater discharges into the MS4 Enforcement Response Procedure Name of person responsible for violation(s) Date and location of violation(s) Description of violation(s) — relevant regulatory mechanism Corrective actions issued — with schedule Date & type of enforcement used to compel compliance Referrals to other regulatory organizations — if any Date of resolution Written procedures for investigating, locating, and eliminating the sources of illicit discharges Written procedures for responding to spills MCM 4 — CONSTRUCTION SITE CONTROLS Regulatory Mechanism — require site plans list erosion prevention, sediment and waste controls Enforcement Response Procedure Name of person responsible for violation(s) Date and location of violation(s) Description of violation(s) — relevant regulatory mechanism Corrective actions issued — with schedule Date & type of enforcement used to compel compliance Referrals to other regulatory organizations — if any Date of resolution Written procedure — site plan review Written procedure — receipt and consideration of reports from the public Written procedure — conducting site inspections ID priority sites for inspection ID frequency of inspections Name or position title of responsible person Checklist (or other written means) to document inspections MCM 5 — POST- CONSTRUCTION CONTROLS Regulatory Mechanism — meeting all permit requirements & conditions G:\ENG \Terry \Surface Water Management\2014 SWMPg3 Updat e\ ivleetings \MEMO_CityComcil_012615 rev.docx Paul Oehme Surface Water Management Plan Update January 26, 2015 Page 6 Conditions Limitations & exceptions Exceptions for volume Mitigation procedures Long -term maintenance — for BMPs not owned or operated by permittee Inspections Preserve the permittee's right to ensure maintenance responsibility Protect/preserve BMPs' effectiveness Enforcement Response Procedure Name of person responsible for violation(s) Date and location of violation(s) Description of violation(s) — relevant regulatory mechanism Corrective actions issued — with schedule Date & type of enforcement used to compel compliance Referrals to other regulatory organizations — if any Date of resolution Written procedure - site plan review MCM 6 — Pollution Prevention & Good Housekeeping Facilities inventory BMPs for facilities & operations BMPs for Source Water Protection Areas Pond assessment procedures & schedule Inspection checklists — if any — not required Maintenance forms - if any — not required Employee training materials and/or sources (Web hyperlinks) — if any — not required SCHEDULE Staff is anticipating setting a schedule for updating our surface water management plan that would result in a public hearing and approval for plan distribution for review at the April 20' meeting with plan adoption in July. Code updates will take place concurrent to this activity but, as they may be included as an appendix to the plan, they will be addressed on their own timeline that is currently being developed. ATTACHMENTS 1. Watershed Rule Matrix. 2. Gantt Chart of SWMP Update G:\ENG \Terry \Surface Water Management\2014 SWMPg3 UpdateNeetings \MEMO_Citycomcil_012615_mv.docx Monte MCA ncRUIT Nr1TFS blANUANU FLOODPIAIN ALTERATION: THRESHOLD bHHrvHA.b[N These uses shall be permitted within the Floodway District to the extent that they are not prohibited by any other ordinance or watershed district regulations and provided they do ! require structures, fill, or storage of materials or equipment in addition, no use within oodway district shall be permitted to adversely affect the capacity of the channels or oodways or any tributary to the mainstream or of any drainage ditch, or any other drainage facili or system —LI rvno.., v,•, uw„ •.oil,. ...•, i�m�,�,+,.,.,,,,,•., Any land4slurbing activities or filing of land below the 100 -year (Mori elevation of a waterbod in the watershed. ........ � ......... ....... .•........_..___._...._. No person shall alter of fill land below the 100 -year high water elevation withou a mtit. oQ`v 4F � �F>- The RPBCWD me only oppress within floodplains All olBlulf Creekaalready wthfn BCOD and Chanhassen requires a 50 foot setback hom top ofbankof watercourses already. lakes have a setback of between 50'and 150'. On subdivisions 9 has been ourprectice to acquire foodplain in mdlt. ON 60.3(d(3) Communtes must prohbt enroachents wdhn regulatory )_ i_ _c_ m _ floodways (44 CFR 59.1) unless it U demonstrated through hydro analyses that it would not result in ANY increase in /Mod levels _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ In Chanhassen the 100 Aboo'plain is consistent to the floodway. Any alteration of surface water flows below the 100-year flood elevation: diverting, obstructing or newly ouflatfing FLOODPLAIN: ALTERATION CRITERIA Two feet b above year a vatior No new rm rvious surface w n ear > We have no and ation requirement 1:1 volume mitigation 2 -feet frceboard No adverse effect on flood risk, base flow, channel stability, No increase in flood elevation O'setbackregardless of flood lain I No sWcture wfln 100feet of centerline of watercourse - excepting bridges and trails 10'width Fill shall not result in a net decrease in storage capacity. Mitigation shall occur prior to Wcemen(offill. I( cannotinclude ex ansion ofshoreline . ce n ge gr ing mus can orm wr ongina cross -sec on WETLAND AND CREEK BUFFERS THRESHOLD With the creation of any new lot Rule B - Flood lain Management Stormwater Man emsnt Rule Buffer should be 2quisedanytime that a wetalnd is impacted or a catigation area is created. Rule E - Drell in Water Body Crossings Rule Rule F- Shoreline Stabilization New principal residential simcure with net increase in hardcover Rule G - Walerrbotl Crossings Rule d- Stamwater Management App laslo pelves: tricompasing or adjacent LOa public wateroonuseTIM Wetland or other protected wenand Applies M Properties: Encompasing or adjacent to any watercourse within a High Risk Erosion Area - can provitle contrary evidence WETLANDANDCREEK BUFFERS: DISTANCES Preserve= 1 ETBA K xce tion = AV reserve= 1 Suggest altering setbacks M become consistent with MCWD andMtb'ng RPBC}V12Sg1PfLtAm Werryye;l 29"togragsef6acks Fxfstinq l_famill-- 20'AVG/10'MIN ___ For linearprojects d shall be limited to the extent ofthe dgMO %way _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Need to go thro h aterie forclassifcatMn for each Man 1= 25'MIN 130' SETBACK SS FEET With Value= 60'AVGI3rY MIN Manage 1= 40'BASEl34'MIN Man e2 =20' MIN 130'SETBACK 50 FEET Medium Value= 40' AVG 120'MIN Manage 2= 30'BASE 124'MIN Man 3= 16.5MIN130 SEI BACK46.5 FEET Low Value = 20'AVG 110'MIN Manage 3 = 20' BASE II6'MIN NA PW Watercourse = 50' AVG / 30' MIN NA NA High.nsk Watercourse = bU AVU I JU MIN NA WETLANDANDCREEK BUFFERS: ESTABLISHMENT AND MAINTENANCE 7u7%—p!an7eT'w1 mom in with native vegetation of varying percent composition - but can't be noxious or inversive swine Must be planted and maintained in native vege ion. y rro cu bvate, mow, ferfllae or pasture the buffer area. Must np sots, establish native vegetation and have a maintenance an montil plan. Monuments aired -1 r lot no more than 300 fcet May selectively remove noxious, etc and use herbicidelpesficide Monuments required- every 100 feet No flI material or sbuclureexcept boardwalk, sidewalk and stortnwater turesshalt be allowed within buffer. Nofil material or structure except boardwalk, sidewalk and Stomrwater features shall be allowed within buffer. No fill malaria asWCture except boardwalk, sidewalk and slomrvraler features shall be allowed within bufla. Shall be recorded against the property Recorded against dead Performance Bond 50 CY or 5000 SF 150 CY or 5000 SF EROSION & SEDIMENT: henthbuW k wafer of the state THRESHOLD tee an Ig ivy mvtu . one EROSION & SEDIMENT: CRITERIA CONSISTENT DREDGING &SEDIMENT REMOVAL 4 Permit required to remove 1 CY or more of sediment No dredging within any public water Leave with watershed districts Only rmiffedfor maintenance, nutrients reduction or wildife Same as RPBCWD No pannit re uirsd if anapproved DNR permit is procurex City can get fast track permit up to 20CY with 48 hour notice DREDGING& SEDIMENTI REMOVAL: STANDARDS st mmrma im actsoutwn Must be minima im aA solution Cannot alter original alignment slope or x- sectior IDspoils dis salsite Cannot enlarge natural basin or create new connections Must include plan to remediate sediment source where possible Will not occur above the OHW Remainder same as RPBCWD Cannot occur in channel steeper than 3:1 or lake 10:1 flEcologically sensitive luamint cause seepage or result In su u ace rainagE SHORELINE & STREAMBANK STABILIZATION q� Persil required for any improvement or stabilizalln of a streambank or shoreline: rip rap. sand blanket, etc Same as RPBCWD. Sand blanket may be faslracked Add zoning permit provisionforreviewofclearcutting and othershaelnd requirement but leave with districts arMONR. No rmit if DNR and issued No rmhto maintain exis6n Ain -kind replacement SHORELINE& SHORELI E& STABILIZATION Must demonstrate need. Must rovide shoreline erosion intensity calculations to justify uencin :Bice ineenn 'antis wnsistentwith shoeline LIC Combination!03 and bioen ineennc With shear strew talcs to support can o no ran Used DNRCmedafor des' n _ FR walls care rohiWed Sand blankets follows DNR rules STANDARD CHANHASSEN RILEY PURGATORY BLUFF CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT NPDES MS4 PERMIT NOTES These development standards shall be reflected in plans prepared by developers and /or Subdivision of property one acre or larger into or more lots; alteration of New development and re-development projects with one acre or more We need to evaluate ourtrlggers. One (1) acre perhaps too large but STORMWATER project proposers in the design and layout of site plans, subdivisions and water topography to effect mnof from 1 ac or larger lot disurbance. This shall include areas less than 1 ac if part of larger commong RPBCWD triggers foe low. Creation of three or more lots; site plan that MANAGEMENT: management features, i.e. no minimum threshold 50GY FILL plan of development. disturbs 10,000SF; creation of more than 5,0003i'meer ioumnlace; TRIGGER SODD SF Disturbance mdemkpment thatdces not result in a decrease in hardcover. Language 3 Lot Subdivision 1961 TP 40; Major Facilities desinged based upon 1D0.YR type II; Minor facilities No distinction evaluate destaned for 10-YR ad 1 - F Atlas 14 or most recent NWS reference data Atlas 14 or most recent NWS reference data Existing pennitees shall revise as necessary current program to implement and No increase in 1-, 10. and 100 -year where SW discharges across site enforce a Post-Construction S(ormwater management program that reduces No increase in peak rates from proposed project for l or2, 10, and 100 year. Valances Limit peak flow rates to existing for 2-, 10. and 100.year storms for all points boundary. For ag land new development shall not increase rates over modeler water pollution after construction related to new development and allowed if comparators show no... where stormwater discharges site. meadow condition. redevelopment Will need to define 'at each discrete outler and no variances _ _ _ _ a 0 No volume requirements w Provide for abstraction of 1.1 inches of mnof from impervious surface. Must No net imrease tram pre - project from pre -pi conditions on annual basis cd Volume required via MS4, MC WD, CCH'MO and NPDES Construction. oreheat runoff for infiltration and filtration features. Must have 3 -feet se ration Provide for abstraction of first 1.0 inch of rain from impervious surface. discharge volume, TSS and TP. Recommend MIDS._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ a New development shall result in no net increase in TP from existing conditions. Owners and /or operators of construclgion activities must submit site plans with 61 and 90%TSS Removal 60 %TP and 90 %TSS: Abstraction counts to compliance. Ag land shall be modeled as meadow condition. poi SW management BMPS to parmilm for review and a roval. We GOIIset am0Imum Thresh old. Ariy/rg1XwTa�toblsMG. Existing single family home sites largely exempt from design standards but No BMPS required on existing single (amity homes. No BMPS required on single family homes No BMPS required on single family homes must III a BMP consistent w th sonne MIN ouddelffre MNSWIA. MiDs. Otherwise we administer. ----------------------- w Redvelopment with <50% disturbance only treat new impervious and disturbed There are several areas deficient on treatment and storage (town center). Nos specific requirement Has been tice to address new impervious a >50% then all area Requirements vary depending upon size of site, the percent of the site NET REDUCTION ON ANNUAL BASIS: Volume, TSS and TP Should adopt jachicti harredevelcipment anyway disturbed and whether impervious surface is reduced or increased, rr w Limit peak flow rates to existing for 2, 10- and 1 00-year storms for all points Maximum extent practicable and must make'reasomble aftempf topurchase 5 where stormwater discharges site. New road or Uail> 10000 SF must meet all requirement additional RIW 3 rolects Nreen OSF and provide 1. ' a slracton m new Ro won w/> an Qac new impervious must meet P and rate No specific requirements for linear projects. u impervious. control Projects >1AC new impervious must provide abstraction of larger: 0.55' runoff from new imptennours surface or, L 1' from net increase HC Road won > 1 a new impervious must meet all requirements Applicant must provide narrative listing and explaining variables that limit feasibility of 1 inch. Narrative and concept plan discussing how reasonable There are conditions in which infiltration is prohibited - contaminated soils, less wApplicant must demonstrate to the satisfaction of district engineer that above modifications to project would influnce feasibility of meefing l'. An explanation than 3 fast to ground water, etc. Must achieve volume reducdon to mac extent We have no volume requirement so hence no restricted site sequencing and exceptions. 0 a cannot be met Then following uencin of efforts undertaken by applicant to accomodate or remove constraints. practicable MEP using other techniques - muse, green roofs, etc. w � Abstraction of at least 055 inches from applicable impervious surfaces, or Must achieve abstraction of greatest amount feasible and at least 0.5 inches. STORMWATER Abstraction of what on-ste to greatest extent practicable, or Must treat full inch for P. They offer unique credits - trees MANAGEMENT: Off-site abstraction and treatment. CRITERIA All scenarios must meet 60%TP 90 %TSS requirements Adopt MIDs and MN SW manual sequencing and pictubded infiltration areas. 2 feet of free board 2 feat of freeboard landlocked - feet above back to bay 1 year events or 10 day snowmet Landlocked basins designed to hold back to back 100.YR a whichever is greater. Landlocked must hold back- to-back 100 year events. 0 m w Requirements for ouUetiing landlocked - dead storage requirements, review downstream impi demonstrate need May not increase volume draining to band locked receiving area. Modeling Stomnva er volume and rate analysis for 1,10 and 1 O Site plan w/ property lines, all contributing subwa(ersheds, proposed BMPS, delineation of existing walerbodies, existing and proposed NWL of OFII 2 -fo GShe plan wM property lines, contrours and NWL & 100-YR contours, construction plans for stonmvater BMPS � Geotech analysis at all proposed SW management locations soils sampling an to at least 5 feet at proposed facility ovations. as -built drawings showin that compliant with approved plans Soil ammendmant plan following MN SW Manual guidarim, All hydrolog C, hydraulic & water quality calcs used in the design All hydrologic, h draulic & water quality talcs used in the design Create O&M plan and declaration All facilities designed with maintenance access All facilities desi ned with maintenance access In rpetudy maintenance In perpetuity maintenance FacilNes maintenance, inspection and monitoring plan Facilities maintenance, inspection and monitoring Ian a Identiheswiteduleofactivities& Res nsible ies Identifies schedule of activities& Responsible parl w z Provides for inspections and maintenance in- perpetuity with records available at districts request The Ian must be recorded against the deec The plan must be recorded against the deer Construction or reconstruction of a single-family home New development with loss than 20% impervious or less than one acre area Redevelopment of a site less than 5 acres (hot will result in 10% or greater \oat ti 0 \oa5 q decrease in imperious surface or a site greater than 5 ac where less than into disturbed & 10% reduction impervious Linear hanseartation Prowts with less than 10, 000 SF of new impervious Sidewalksandlinall 2 feet or narrower with an impervious downsbope buffer at least 50 % as wide Surface Water Period Highlight: 18 Plan .Actual . %Complete x Actual (beyond plan) Management Plan Update PERCENT ACTIVITY COMPLETE PERIODS 1 Kickoff Meeting 100% Data Collection 90% Construct Model 90% Draft Report (50% plan) 25% Review SWMP 2G- Implementati( o% Review SWMP 2G - Goals & Policl, 60% Develop implementation anions 0% Status Meeting 0% Worksession 50% Council Worksession 25% Present to EC - Goals &Policies 0% Present to PC - Goals &Policies 056 Open House - Goals & Policies o% Submittal Plan Due o% Pre .. CC W.fth., /A, Dd....n 0% Plan Revisions 0% RPBCWD Board Approval 0% MCWD Board Approval o% Council Adoption o% 11 12 13 10 15 16 17 . %Complete (beyond plan( 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 3 "dk 44 45 46 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 Week o a o o starting ° 0 . . $ o n "' o n '^ ry o '^ o '^ o 0 n o v o3 ^ ry o n � o o ° n° o ° ° o r ° 0 0 Sunday w o 0 0 °` 3 m r m m zi r m„ m �o Q `o v , v m , m jr N ,. n H .. r �+ l0 n r n m m 3 o- 3, r w N A i e e e e n n n m m