The URL can be used to link to this page

A-6. Discuss Visioning Process for the Lifestyle Center IOW A - (0 CITY OF MEMORANDUM CHANH SSEN TO: Mayor and City Council 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 FROM: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Chanhassen MN 55317 DATE: Apn127, 2015 Administration Phone 952 2271100 SUBJ: Discuss Visioning Process for the Lifestyle Center Fax 952 2271110 Building Inspections To help develop a vision for The Quadrant, the Mayor suggested that City Council Phone 952 2271180 members come to the work session with thoughts, goals and ideas for the project Fax 952 2271190 Attached is a Charge Statement and Visioning Outline that you can use as a tool to Engineering gather outcomes and goals for the project. Phone 952 2271160 Fax 952 2271170 On Monday night we will have a brainstorming session to complete the Charge Statement and then discuss next steps in the process. Finance Phone 952 2271140 Fax 952 2271110 ATTACHMENTS Park&Recreation 1. Charge Statement Phone 952 2271120 2 Project Kick-Off Meeting and Schedule Fax 952 2271110 3. Memo from Kate Aanenson dated April 13, 2015 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone 952 2271400 Fax 952 2271404 Planning& Natural Resources Phone 952 2271130 Fax 952 2271110 Public Works 7901 Park Place Phone 952 2271300 Fax 952 2271310 Senior Center Phone 952 2271125 Fax 952 2271110 Website www ci chanhassen mn us g\admm\tg\lifestyle center\visioning memo 4-27-15 docx Chanhassen is a Community for Life-Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow Charge Statement Goal What is the purpose of the group (Stakeholders)) Results Desired Product/Outcomes expected from the group (Stakeholders). Scope of Responsibility & Level of Authority Who does the group (Stakeholders) report to") Timeline When is the project due? Next meeting date Resources Available What other expertise is available & who are those resources? Communication What strategies would you like to be used to communicate) Expectations for Membership/Stakeholders Names and numbers of those present, member responsibilities City of Chanhassen Quadrant Visioning Study Project Kick-off Meeting Tuesday,April 14, 2015 1:00—2:30 pm Chanhassen City Hall Agenda 1. Introductions 2. Project Introductions • Background • Current Development Status • Desired Outcomes 3. Project Scope and Stakeholders 4. Project Schedule 5. Stakeholder Engagement Techniques Stakeholder Engagement Technique • Property Owners Individual or Joint Meeting • Neighborhood Residents Evening Meeting, Instant Poll and Survey • Broader Community Project website and Survey • Chamber of Commerce/Business Breakfast Meeting, Instant Poll and Survey Community • Elected and Appointed Officials Joint Work Session • City Staff Three (3) Meetings over course of project 6. What Defines "Vision"? 7 How is Vision Enforced? 8 Project Logistics • Land Use Concepts to be Shared with Public • Stakeholder Invitations • Website Hosting 9. Next Steps City of Chanhassen Quadrant Visioning Study Sample Meeting Agenda Date Time (Length?) Location Agenda 1 Review Meeting Agenda 2 Project Introduction • Project Tasks and Schedule • Desired Project Outcomes • Desired Meeting Outcome 3. Site Orientation • Location and Existing Features • Current Land Use • Guided Land Use • Land Uses/Development Concept under Consideration 4. Land Use Discussion • Issues and Opportunities with Land Uses/Development Concepts 5. Visioning Introduction • Survey 6. Next Steps/Adorn City of Chanhassen Quadrant Visioning Study What Defines "Vision"? • Land Use • Circulation o Traffic o Pedestrian o Bicycle • Parking • Edge Conditions • Density • Public Uses/Spaces/Programming • Aesthetics o Building Form and Materials o Landscaping o Signage. Location, Form/Size, and Materials • What is Missing? I • _ 0 • Z • = 0 • • U o a • E I , a) E ! ' o, >- o c3 ! E -a CD) t1iLiii cnO = CC CC Y U QJ Q 0 O 13 2G G CD a � O >- o a) rr., _cu CO 0 o c 0 co ? jkillMEMORANDUM CITY OF TO Todd Gerhardt, City Manager CHANHASSENFROM. Kate Aanenson, AICP, Community Development Director 7700 Market Boulevard DATE. April 13, 2015 PO Box 147 �` d 1l // Chanhassen,MN 55317 '�► SUBJ• Discuss Visioning Process for the Lifestyle Center Administration Phone 952 2271100 Fax 952 2271110 As a part of the conceptual review of the Level 7 Development plan on March 9, 2015, the City Council directed staff to work on developing a Visioning Study for the Building Inspections Lifestyle Center property. Staff has consulted with SRF Consulting Group, Inc to Phone 952 2271180 prepare a Professional Services Agreement As outlined by Barry Warner in the Fax 952 2271190 attached proposal, the visioning process is intended to inform the elected and appointed officials along with the city staff, of the values and priorities presented to Engineering Phone 952 2271160 the various stakeholders Fax 952 2271170 The focus of the study will on the following Finance Phone 952 2271140 • Composition of development uses Fax 952 2271110 o Circulation including vehicles, pedestrians and bicycles Park&Recreation o Edge treatment and landscaping Phone 952 2271120 0 Programmable civic area and amenities Fax 952 2271110 o Development character, scale and aesthetics Recreation Center Mr Warner has outlined the suggested 3-4 month process and the stakeholder 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone 952 2271400 meetings. A web-based survey will also be a component of the visioning process Fax 952 2271404 His proposal includes a budget of$30,000 Planning& Mr. Warner will be at the work session to answer any questions that the Council may Natural Resources have regarding the proposal Staff recommends placing the Professional Services Phone 952 2271130 Fax 952 2271110 Agreement on the next City Council agenda for approval Public Works ATTACHMENTS 7901 Park Place Phone 952 2271300 1 SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Visioning Study Proposal dated March 30,2015 Fax 952 2271310 Senior Center g\plan\2015 planning cases\2015-05 lifestyle center\vision process\cc work session 4-13 docx Phone 952 2271125 Fax 952 2271110 Website www ci chanhassen mn us Chanhassen is a Community for Life-Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow MI h - ENGINEERS PLANNER S DESIGNER S Cmuulting Group,Inc March 30, 2015 DRAFT For REVIEW Kate Aanenson, AICP Community Development Director CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 SUBJECT PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR A VISIONING STUDY Based on your request, we are pleased to submit this proposal to provide professional services for conducting a visioning study in association with the Quadrant and the adjacent parcels For purposes of this letter, the "Quadrant" will refer to the contiguous 118 acres currently owned by several private parties. Study Background and Intent A 118 acre tract of undeveloped land is located in the City of Chanhassen near Lyman and Powers Boulevards near TH 212 The area is owned by several private parties with development designated for mixed land uses including a retail center Although general land use designations have been suggested, formal approvals for development have not been obtained from the City of Chanhassen. The visioning exercise and outcome is intended to inform elected policy makers and appointed officials along with city staff as to the values and priorities presented by the diverse stakeholder groups who have interest in future development of the Quadrant Visioning for the purpose of this exercise, is intended to focus upon several topics to include, • Composition of development uses • Circulation including vehicle,pedestrian and bicycle • Open space functions • Edge treatments and landscaping • Programmable civic areas and amenities • Development character, scale and aesthetics Input garnered from the various interested parties will be used to inform the Quadrant and related development projects during their municipal approvals Approach Meaningful facilitation of the representative stakeholder groups will be paramount to achieve the study intent To that end,meetings or other means will occur with individual groups to seek input from those individuals who have shown interest or are thought to present valuable perspectives for the proposed development www.srfconsulting com One Carlson Parkway North,Suite 150 I Minneapolis,MN 55447 4443 ( 763 475 0010 fax 763.475 2429 An Equal Opportunity Employer - 2 - March 30, 2015 Each of the meetings, work sessions or active surveys will employ precedent project images that portray alternative approaches to related project elements. This technique will allow participants to compare and contrast how varying built projects responded to similar project elements. Participants will be asked to provide preference or priority for the images, and when possible, to provide subjective comments as to suggested changes or improvements that may benefit the Chanhassen application. Identified stakeholder groups and their engagement follow, Current development parcel property owners-one to two facilitated meetings dependent upon their willingness to participate together Adjacent neighborhood-one facilitated meeting, likely to be held late afternoon or early evening Community at large-web based survey(see below) Chamber of Commerce/Downtown Chanhassen Business Community-one facilitated meeting, likely to be held early morning consistent with business owner availability Elected/Appointed Officials-one facilitated meeting, likely a joint work session of the City Council and the Planmng Commission Web based survey-A web based survey such as Mind Mixer or Survey Monkey would be made available to solicit input from interested parties for a defined period of about 4 weeks Participant input would be monitored and recorded. Study End Product Stakeholder input received from the vanous facilitated meetings along with the web based sampling will be summarized in a concise report and made available to the city for use by staff, the City Council and Planning Commission ASSUMPTIONS Base mapping and concepts plans for parcel development will be provided by the city and will be used for any necessary mapping Work sessions with staff will be the primary source of input to guide decision making SCHEDULE We will complete this work within a mutually agreed-upon time schedule Upon a formal notice to proceed, work would commence with a staff work session/kick off meeting. It is assumed that baseline work tasks would occur in April, followed by primary stakeholder group input during May and early June A summary document would be made available in late June or early July - 3 - March 30, 2015 BASIS OF PAYMENT/BUDGET We propose to be reimbursed for our services on an hourly basis for the actual time expended. Direct project expenses, such as printing, supplies, reproduction, etc., will be billed at cost, and mileage will be billed at the current allowable IRS rate for business miles Invoices are submitted on a monthly basis for work performed during the previous month. Payment is due within 30 days Based on our understanding of the project and our scope of services,we estimate the not-to-exceed cost of our services to be $30,000, which includes both time and expenses The exact allocation of related consultant staff time toward specific work tasks and stakeholder meetings will be arrived upon in joint discussions between city staff and the consultant project manager CHANGES IN THE SCOPE OF SERVICES It is understood that if the scope or extent of work changes, the cost will be adjusted accordingly. Before any out-of-scope work is initiated, however, we will submit a budget request for the new work and will not begin work until we receive authorization from you. STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS The attached Standard Terms and Conditions (Attachment A) together with this proposal for professional services constitute the entire agreement between the Client and SRF Consulting Group, Inc and supersede all prior written or oral understandings This agreement may only be amended, supplemented,modified or canceled by a duly executed written instrument. NOTICE TO PROCEED A signed copy of this proposal or a separate letter of authorization, either mailed or emailed to our office, will serve as our notice to proceed. The email address is bwarner@srfconsultmg com - 4 - March 30, 2015 We sincerely appreciate your consideration of this proposal and look forward to working with you on this project Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, SRF CONSULTING GROUP,INC Barry J Warner, FASLA AICP Senior Vice President Attachment A— Standard Terms and Conditions APPROVED: (signature) Name Title Date This cost proposal is valid for a period of 90 days. SRF reserves the right to adjust its cost estimate after 90 days from the date of this proposal. SRF PProposal numbers issued by marketing [Document l] ATTACHMENT A STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS The Standard Terms and Conditions together with the attached Proposal for Professional Services constitute the entire Agreement between the CLIENT and SRF Consulting Group,Inc ("SRF")and supersede all pnor written or oral understandings This Agreement may only be amended,supplemented,modified,or canceled by a duly executed written instrument 1 STANDARD OF CARE a The standard of care for all professional services performed or fiurnshed by SRF under this Agreement will be the care and skill ordmanly used by members of SRF's profession practicing under similar circumstances at the same time and in the same locality SRF makes no warranties,expressed or imphed,under the Agreement or otherwise,m connection with SRF's service b The CLIENT shall be responsible for,and SRF may rely upon,the accuracy and completeness of all requirements,programs, instructions,reports,data,and other information furnished by CLIENT to SRF pursuant to this Agreement SRF may use such requirements,reports,data,and information in performing or furnishing services under this Agreement 2 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR All duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will be for the sole and exclusive benefit of the CLIENT and SRF and not for the benefit of any other party Nothing contained m this Agreement shall create a contractual relationslup with or a cause of action in favor of a third party against either the CLIENT or SRF SRF's services under this Agreement are being performed solely for the CLIENT's benefit,and no other entity shall have any claims against SRF because of this Agreement or the perfonnance or nonperformance of services hereunder 3 PAYMENT TO SRF Invoices will be prepared in accordance with SRF's standard invoicing practices and will be submitted to the CLIENT by SRF monthly,unless otherwise agreed Invoices are due and payable within thirty(30)days of receipt If the CLIENT fails to make any payment due SRF for services and expenses within forty-five(45)days after receipt of SRF's invoice thereafter,the amounts due SRF will be increased at the rate of 1-1/2%per month(or the maxunum rate of interest permitted by law,if less) In addition,SRF may, after giving seven days written notice to the CLIENT,suspend services under this Agreement until SRF has been paid in full of amounts due for services,expenses,and other related charges 4 OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST Any opinions of costs prepared by SRF represent its,judgment as a design professional and are furnished for the general guidance of the CLIENT Since SRF has no control over the cost of labor,materials,market condition,or competitive bidding, SRF does not guarantee the accuracy of such cost opinions as compared to contractor or supplier bids or actual cost to the CLIENT 5 INSURANCE SRF will maintain insurance coverage for Workers'Compensation,General Liabihty,Automobile Liability and Professional Liability and will provide certificates of insurance to the CLIENT upon request 6 INDEMNIFICATION AND ALLOCATION OF RISK a To the fullest extent pennitted by law, SRF agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the CLIENT,their officers,directors and employees against all damages,liabilities or costs(including reasonable attorneys'fees and defense costs)to the extent caused by SRF's negligent acts under this Agreement and that of its subconsultants or anyone for whom SRF is legally hable b To the fullest extent permitted by law,the CLIENT agrees to indemnify and hold harmless SRF,their officers, directors and employees against all damages,liabilities or costs(including reasonable attorneys'fees and defense costs)to the extent caused by the CLIENT's negligent acts under this Agreement and that of its subconsultants or anyone for whom the CLIENT is legally liable 7 TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT Either party may at any time, upon seven days prior written notice to the other party, terminate this Agreement Upon such termination,the CLIENT shall pay to SRF all amounts owing to SRF under this Agreement,for all work performed up to the effective date of termination. 8 OWNERSHIP AND REUSE OF DOCUMENTS All documents prepared or furnished by SRF pursuant to this Agreement are instruments of service,and SRF shall retain an ownership and property interest therein Reuse of any such documents by the CLIENT shall be at CLIENT's sole nsk;and the CLIENT agrees to Page 1 of 2 (Standard Terms and Conditions) Rev August 18,2011 indemnify, and hold SRF harmless from all claims, damages, and expenses including attorney's fees arising out of such reuse of documents by the CLIENT or by others acting through the CLIENT 9 USE OF ELECTRONIC MEDIA a Copies of Documents that may be retied upon by the CLIENT are limited to the pnnted copies(also known as hard copies)that are signed or sealed by SRF Files in electronic media format of text,data,graphics,or of other types that are furnished by SRF to the CLIENT are only for convenience of the CLIENT Any conclusion or information obtained or derived from such electronic files will be at the user's sole risk b When transferring documents in electronic media format,SRF makes no representations as to long-term compatibility,usability, or readability of documents resulting from the use of software application packages,operating systems, or computer hardware differing from those used by SRF at the beginning of this Assignment c If there is a discrepancy between the electronic files and the hard copies,the hard copies govern d Because data stored in electronic media format can deteriorate or be modified inadvertently or otherwise without authorization of this data's creator,the party receiving electronic files agrees that it will perform acceptance tests or procedures within sixty(60) days,after which the receiving party shall be deemed to have accepted the data thus transferred Any errors detected witlun the sixty(60)day acceptance period will be corrected by the party delivering the electronic files SRF shall not be responsible to maintain documents stored in electronic media format after acceptance by the CLIENT 10 FORCE MAJEURE SRF shall not be liable for any loss or damage due to failure or delay in rendering any service called for under this Agreement resulting from any cause beyond SRF's reasonable control 11 ASSIGNMENT Neither party shall assign its rights,interests or obligations under this Agreement without the express written consent of the other Part' 12 BINDING EFFECT This Agreement shall bind,and the benefits thereof shall inure to the respective parties hereto,their legal representatives,executors, adnurnstrators,successors,and assigns 13 SEVERABILITY AND WAIVER OF PROVISIONS Any provisions or part of the Agreement held to be void or unenforceable under any laws or regulations shall be deemed stricken,and all remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and bmding upon the CLIENT and SRF,who agree that the Agreement shall be reformed to replace such stricken provision or part thereof with a valid and enforceable provision that comes as close as possible to expressing the intention of the stricken provision. Non-enforcement of any provision by either party shall not constitute a waiver of that provision,nor shall it affect the enforceability of that provision or of the remainder of this Agreement 14 SURVIVAL All provisions of this Agreement regarding Ownership of Documents and Reuse of Documents, Electronic Media provisions, Indemnification and Allocation of Risk,and Dispute Resolution shall remain in effect 15 DISPUTE RESOLUTION If negotiation m good faith fails to resolve a dispute within the thirty(30)days of notice of the dispute,or time penod specified by applicable law, then the parties agree that each dispute, claim or controversy arising from or related to this Agreement or the relationships which result from this Agreement shall be subject to mediation as a condition precedent to initiating legal or equitable actions by either party Unless the parties agree otherwise,the mediation shall be in accordance with the Commercial Mediation Procedures of the American Arbitration Association then currently in effect A request for mediation shall be filed m writing with the American Arbitration Association and the other party No legal or equitable action may be instituted for a period of ninety(90)days from the filing of the request for mediation unless a longer penod of time is provided by agreement of the parties Cost of mediation shall be shared equally between the parties Mediation shall be held in a location mutually agreed upon by the parties The parties shall memonahze any agreement resulting from the mediation in a mediated settlement agreement, which agreement shall be enforceable as a settlement in any court having jurisdiction thereof 16 CONTROLLING LAW This Agreement is to be governed by the law of the principal place of business of SRF Page 2 of 2 (Standard Terms and Conditions) Rev August 18,2011 401 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TO Todd Gerhardt, City Manager CHANHASSEN FROM. Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner 7700 Market Boulevard DATE. April 27, 2015eQ PO Box 147 Chanhassen,MN 55317 SUBJ• Preliminary Plat with Variances to replat of 2.74 acres into four lots, AdministrationRedstone Ridge—Planning Case#2015-08 Phone 952 2271100 Fax 952 2271110 PROPOSED MOTION Building Inspections "The City Council approves Preliminary Plat with Variances to replat of 2 74 Phone 952 2271180 acres into four lots, Redstone Ridge, on property zoned Single Family Residential Fax 952 2271190 (RSF) and located at 6341 and 6400 Teton Lane, and adoption of the attached Engineering Fmdmgs of Fact " Phone 952 2271160 Fax 952 2271170 City Council approval requires a majority vote of the entire City Council Finance Phone 952 2271140 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Fax 952 2271110 The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval to replat 2 74 acres into four Park&Recreation lots and a variance to allow neck lots Notice of this public hearing has been mailed Phone 952 2271120 to all property owners within the required 500 feet. Staff is recommending approval Fax 952 2271110 of the request with conditions Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY Phone 952 2271400 Fax 952 2271404 The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on April 7,2015 to review the proposed request The Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the Planning& Natural Resources preliminary plat Phone 952 2271130 Fax 952 2271110 The April 7,2015 Planning Commission minutes are a part of the consent agenda in the April 27, 2015 City Council packet. Public Works 7901 Park Place RECOMMENDATION Phone 952 2271300 Fax 952 2271310 Staff recommends City Council approve Preliminary Plat with Variances to replat of Senior Center 2 74 acres into four lots,Redstone Ridge, on property zoned Single Family Residential Phone 952 2271125 (RSF) and located at 6341 and 6400 Teton Lane, and adoption of the attached Findings Fax 952 2271110 of Fact Website ATTACHMENTS www ci chanhassen mn us 1. Planning Commission Staff Report Dated April 7, 2015 g\plan\2015 planning cases\2015-08 redstone ridge sub var vac\executive summary doc Chanhassen is a Community for Life-Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow 1 ` Y 0 PC DATE: 4/7/2015 CC DATE: 4/27/2015 • CITY (-Hi' CHANHASSEN REVIEW DEADLINE: 6/13/2015 4111 a S CASE #: 2015-08 BY: Al-Jaff, et al PROPOSED MOTION: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve Preliminary Plat with Variances to replat of 2.74 acres into four lots, Redstone Ridge, on property zoned Single Family Residential(RSF) and located at 6341 and 6400 Teton Lane, and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation" SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval to replat 2 74 acres into four lots and a variance to allow neck lots. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within the required 500 feet Staff is recommending approval of the request with conditions. LOCATION: 6341 and 6400 Teton Lane Southeast of the intersection of Teton Lane and Bretton Way APPLICANT: Chris May City of Chanhassen 6400 Teton Lane 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 Chanhassen, MN 55317 P. 612-386-5055 E. cmay427@yahoo.com PRESENT ZONING: RSF, Single Family Residential District 2030 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Low Density(Net Density 1 2—4 0 units per acre) ACREAGE: 2 74 Acres (119,667 92 square feet) DENSITY: 1.4 Units per Acre LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance The City has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards This is a quasi-judicial decision SCANNED Planning Commission Redstone Ridge—Planning Case 2015-08 April 7, 2015 Page 2 of 12 PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicant is proposing to subdivide 2 74 acres into four single family lots The property is zoned RSF, Single Family Residential District. The site contains two single-family homes(built in 1956 and 1989), swunmmg pool and a detached garage which are proposed to remain. Access to the site is gained via existmg driveways off of Bretton Way and Teton Lane The site consists of two parcels with existing single-family homes and two remnant unbuildable lots. The applicant is proposing to replat those lots into four single family lots C. — Bretton Way • z - . i': ' Vill1111.1100NNIMPOlgiiiat A-. i- .- , ow I • s - - 4AA. - IN -.- .tip i r{S M OMS f1�M 6341 TETONLN 6400 TETON L r 1.14 4 The southeast corner of the intersection of Bretton Way and Teton Lane is an unutilized right-of- way The applicant is requesting vacation of the right-of-way Staff is recommending approval of the vacation(the vacation of the right-of-way requires City Council action only). Approval of the subdivision will be contingent upon approval of the vacation Planning Commission Redstone Ridge-Planning Case 2015-08 April 7, 2015 Page 3 of 12 The variance in this r X997.20 application is to allow a neck X� Bretton t, lot The subdivision / -rte__ * X996 SG X994)* rr34 ordinance requires a variance ' ' — — �X99*6B be granted in order to allow a / X59921 / I r --_- x.„,,,, neck lot Staff is �, i /-t -..i::-.19"%X' recommending approval of y •41' i ! X991ce.. -4 X`0029/ I ( X99423 the variance to minimize f I I / XIPX)f9 grading This issue is / ( / Xr ,a v :o,ir r� discussed in detail later in the / X999.06 �° X'°°ja - _ 996'9sx / 'iry report i r XfW29r Jsa.IQ t • Area.<76,277.54 S F -, % °41;z XICXX:it j `_ -_ - / y '. I or.�79 r 45 X:01.75 1,6\ Staff has been working with tp�\ , the applicant for several e' t.'96 j� 10vs 7 98* i AX X7o0,:6< X a?.or WO,:G. t j X700560 months. Several development �- - _. , ,. \ I XJppE06 scenarios were examined 7X �- ` I Staff directed the applicant to 'X 4 P°D: DD Xras_ DGg Dmf XffAGg9r 7q.1.00 (� Areas !I, 46.06 S F 57< show how the site would $ ' X7ao ' _ -- 'Xcf !07675 X700453 g [`719,9/faux j :-- —- 1 develop if a public street was __- 1 L ? / , o Xr -. -� ty - o / ' constructed This public -__-• _— ., \ _-. — X76Q7.29 y X707`.33/ X,aff62 I ,t \ '9 `-A.eo t6,06J 48 S.F , ,- — -- 1 1 street concept can serve four -_' EUt / / 0,, � 1, ti n y \ X191 2 I home site;however,it mass X996 se , x,,,,,,,5/,',,, x7D76s6 X; 295 I ' grades the site and removes 97�X 7 \, / - - - ' I .> 'N...., \ % .X`00.170 J I, f' Xt 7.1f4 most of the vegetation 1 , 41 - ��-- , 1 X700- !/ ., � . / i .40920 1 ' 11114 b\ \ \ I �\, _ i / f 1 / The average lot size is 29,916 \ X'007.36 j square feet with a resulting '.%;\\\\\ ;` -�„ X7«09 X7,,,;,, 7 ; , t gross density of 1 4 units per =s," \\\ „.� ` \\gees\`.709623 S% ,904 L Xroaez!. // %1 ' \\ \\$, \� \- \ \\\ :2"x `�` Ar' --74796.13 S.F_. acre and net density of 1 5 '� \\ ��- �� \ —�.7��63X fes" /X996u� \ 9 \ \ \ \\ .i 1 -�'@u-x - io,7 rox /i J units per acre All lots meet ,', ' \ \ \ , , k-_ - r �! _ the minimum area,width, and , `1 . -_ ' - -- --1-,-:-.-..----1-1,-.__ _ - ,_-_-_---____:---- \depth requirements of the \\ \\_ 9L 299 _ \ --, - 960 2. a--_,_, - Zoning Ordinance The site ,, ‘ 1 - __ err- __ "6978` -- 7 -_ 9) contains a bluff along the -----> - - _ -= - _ a south portion The required _ I X965.30 17>> - ys6 "t - _ -'961.67X x,,,„ 964-__ �..,.. setbacks will be maintained from the edge of the bluff Public Street Option The site has mature trees which the applicant is making an effort to preserve. In summary, staff believes that the proposed subdivision is well designed We are recommending that it be approved with a variance to allow a neck lot with conditions outlined in the staff report Planning Commission Redstone Ridge-Planning Case 2015-08 April 7, 2015 Page 4 of 12 PRELIMINARY PLAT The applicant is proposing to subdivide -�. "." • ,, . --M= W.A,...- a 2 74 acre site into four single-family •;;,��. �)7��.-;; *1-i.--4 ;v S, �l w ,, r `,:' ' lots. The gross density of the site is 1.4 �, is t ; - _d units per acre and net density is 1 5 =u\t 4 ¢ v =; x" units per acre All four lots exceed the ,. ,'�,,O' ;• ''!, it IIP t minimum 15,000 square feet of area, ="\ r ,i z•` . '`�i `=''',=/: with an average lot size of 29,916 �. -t-, -.:.___J_____,_ 4 .` '.q o square feet ?�- • x ,-;::'-k, i ij' , ' All four proposed lots meet the -••Wr , 4 ��A -{'' '-� • ' ""."1! „, vp Q ,:,i 2 Qy , .H- !. :x minimum width, and depth 4r� : -1 • ,;(4 `' „;;;•ra;:; 1¢•„Is requirements of the Zoning Ordinance ,.0RR� L_ ' ' 4 ;� '%`� 1. — 'T, ' -- The maximum hard surface coverage f l..: .t ,,o , IN , -I,; ,� Q 4. permitted in the RSF District is 25% \ 0, „ - , ,. i /�I, `r The applicant has not shown these - .,,..\,:--k � ., • y P 4,h).\:�� ; ,„/ >- calculations for Lots 3 and 4 Approval - ” °A g, ' ._,K ",. E _ of the subdivision is conditioned upon - .- '' , -;,i--:----- ,„r4 �' the applicant demonstrating that the "---,:,--c-1,-„, ,_ ' `` _ _ i � �..1�4 y f� -.aw.r a"f 4.e- � hard surface coverage does not exceed ..�r . t ; •'" ."„ 25% The applicant is proposing one . '"---.7 neck lot(Lot 3). Neck lots require a t variance The applicant has demonstrated that there will be less environmental impact through the use of a neck lot Staff notes that the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Requested / Plan and generally consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. Right-of-Way Vacation z. RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS The preliminary plat incorporates a 500 square-foot segment of public right-of-way into the northwest corner of Lot 1 Staff is working with the developer on a title search of that City right- i of-way platted as RLS 11, Tract C to determine the feasibility of vacating that right-of-way. subject site The standard 10-foot at front and 5-foot drainage and utility easements shall be granted around the perimeter of the parcels as shown on the preliminary plat The western side-yard drainage and utility easement on Lot 4 shall be 10 feet wide to accommodate future maintenance of the storm sewer that runs along that property line. Planning Commission Redstone Ridge—Planning Case 2015-08 April 7, 2015 Page 5 of 12 EXISTING CONDITIONS The site currently has four parcels Two of these parcels are unbuildable in their present configurations The applicant is proposing to subdivide to make four buildable lots Two will include the existing houses and the other two will become available building sites The site decreases in elevation from north to south. The grade change is gradual for the first 400 feet or so and then bluff conditions are present The bluff is currently wooded. The remainder of the site is maintained as lawn Soils on the site consist of Lester-Kilkenny loams as identified in the United States Department of Agriculture Web Soil Survey The soils on the site fall into the B hydrologic soils group and would be conducive to infiltration The plans shall show the first-floor elevations of existing buildings on adjacent properties GRADING AND DRAINAGE The proposed design maintains the same overall drainage pattern as existing The site maintains the same setbacks from the bluff area. The grading plans shall be revised to show the proposed elevations at each lot corner and at the corners of the proposed structures Draintile service must be provided for Lots 1 and 2 where runoff will flow from the back to the front of the lot. A soils report is required indicating soil conditions, permeability, slope and water level if detected EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL This project will not exceed the one(1) acre threshold for an NPDES Construction Permit and therefore does not require a SWPPP. However, it must meet Section 19-145 of City Code Items that need to be corrected prior to final plat approval and any earth-disturbing activity includes the following. • The plan must indicate that all swales discharging off site are to have the final 200 feet stabilized and must indicate the method to be used • The silt fence must comply with City Detail 5300 which requires the use of metal tee-posts. • The silt fence shown across Lots 3 and 4 must be placed twenty(20) feet from the top of the bluff to ensure that entire bluff impact zone is protected. • Inlet protection shall be shown on all existing catch basins with the potential to receive runoff from the site or tracked material. • Plan must demonstrate the placement of a rock construction entrance and include a detail Planning Commission Redstone Ridge—Planning Case 2015-08 April 7, 2015 Page 6 of 12 A note shall be made that no less than six (6) inches of topsoil must be placed to achieve the final grade and prior to the placement of any sod. The plan must show a stockpile area for stripped topsoil. The erosion escrow shall reflect this requirement. DRIVEWAY The grading plan shall label the elevation at the centerline of the proposed driveways. The plan must also label the proposed grade of the new driveway for the home on Lot 3 The driveway of Lot 1 must be located a minimum of 40 feet from the intersection of Teton Lane and Bretton Way The location shown on the plan meets this minimum. The new driveway pavement being installed at Lot 3 may not exceed a width of 50 feet Existing pavement may remain in place SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN Sanitary sewer and watermain were constructed under Teton Lane as part of the Curry Farms 2nd Addition development New sanitary sewer and watermain service hook-ups are proposed for Lots 2 and 3 Escrow for the construction of these services and the associated restoration of part of Teton Lane will be collected with the Development Contract STORM WATER UTILITY The Surface Water Utility Charges are calculated based upon land use type and land area Credits may be applied based on storm water practices being implemented but as there are none proposed with the project, the fees will not be adjusted. The fee will be based upon the two newly created lots with a total area of 0.83 acre The following table illustrates the Storm Water Utility Charges associated with the development of this parcel Area Rate Total Water Quality 0 83 ac $2,990/ac $2,481.70 Water Quantity 0.83 ac $4,270/ac $3,544.10 Treatment BMP Credit 0.00 ac $2,830(0 5)/ac ($0 00) $6,025.80 ASSESSMENTS Partial water and sewer hookup fees will be due at the time of final plat, the remaining hook-up fees will be due with the building permit The fees will be assessed at the rate in effect at that time PARKS This property is located within the neighborhood park service area for Curry Farms Park Future residents of Redstone Ridge will have access to the park via a trail connection near the end of Teton Lane Planning Commission Redstone Ridge—Planning Case 2015-08 April 7, 2015 Page 7 of 12 Curry Farms Park is 6 82 acres in size and features a playground,basketball court, open play field, natural areas, small sledding hill and bituminous trails Off-street parking is available at the park along Stratton Court The amenities at the park have been updated within the past 10 years. No additional parkland acquisition is being recommended as a condition of this subdivision tIt'y',„4ss 1.7\4,,1*--,.- .\-r,.,-,_..7..t,:,,-' - - jam} N.. .,, , .... ... ;4 ", . , 4, ‘ ''- : ' +r::-----t ORS 5 �1; t _ u,„„'�•'f 3 Y t Iv y•i'• r�j1U -ell, e.:. . ' .. 5 if,to p, f }�I. ISI- i _ ' �— _ '� •�v'vwy ( • 44 , ' i K r. i ie rte. r.e 5 :a� -'"-.'--•--�L--� j � .� lyy f4Alir it }'sqt 'fta ° T. ,-----1, „! -_r.-- i t }.S t,. ; 4 , }. ./ :S ,•f vim ,. • OL. vf a � � fes #.r $ y�tS( • ' J it� v' 4.-1--"'f.....✓ i t t " , I 3;,1-4..ti: '4.441 - k` , 1. it 1. i _ j - 41r:.!tt i t.. �� .a , 74 *a a t't• - '4 7------c.,__. .)___ 44• ---:,„--: , . ...- ' .-#0-1 _ Iii,„, or, ., , . - N, tip • eA-6„.. . ..-. .,_.., - . ., _,. .. iK)i ,,z,./ 'if . N ,, -,, , 4 : , , ,. ,,„, - ^ . .....p_ 4 4,16LTI ' 1�,� i .,' R. E. • '`"fir,. s--, 4, ,,.-,� 1 AL rife zi d ... � ;It} ! •1 ... s ' ''✓p�.' l C I-7-7, '''''M*.- A ' TRAILS The subject site does not have direct access to a trail, however, convenient access to the Powers Boulevard and Lake Lucy Road bituminous trails is available via local streets. A trail connection from Teton Lane to Knob Hill Lane further enhances the pedestrian opportunities in this neighborhood No additional trail construction is being recommended as a condition of this subdivision LANDSCAPING The applicant for the Redstone Ridge development has submitted tree canopy coverage and preservation calculations They are as follows. Planning Commission Redstone Ridge—Planning Case 2015-08 April 7, 2015 Page 8 of 12 Total upland area (excluding wetlands) 2.74 ac. or 119,354 SF Baseline canopy coverage 38% or 45,354 SF Minimum canopy coverage allowed 30% or 35,806 SF Proposed tree preservation 33% or 39,386 SF The developer meets minimum canopy coverage allowed All adjacent uses are compatible with the proposed development and therefore no bufferyard plantings are required for this subdivision COMPLIANCE WITH ORDINANCE-RSF DISTRICT Lot Lot Lot Home Area Width Depth Setback Ordinance 15,000 90' 125' 30' front/rear 10' sides BLOCK 1 Lot 1 15,128 52 110' 130' 30'/30' 10' Lot 2 21,058 05 90 34' 180' 30'/30' 10' Lot 3 57,191.04 190' 260' 30'/30'* 10' Lot 4 26,290.31 102' 253' 30'/30' 10' Total 119,667 92 *The 30 foot bluff setback includes a 20 foot bluff impact zone SUBDIVISION FINDINGS 1 The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance. Finding: The subdivision meets the intent of the city code subject to the conditions of the staff report and the PUD 2 The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; Finding: The proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable plans 3 The physical characteristics of the site,including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development, Planning Commission Redstone Ridge—Planning Case 2015-08 April 7, 2015 Page 9 of 12 Findin : The proposed site is suitable for development subject to the conditions specified in this report. 4. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter, Finding. The proposed subdivision will be served by adequate urban infrastructure. 5. The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage, Finding: The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage subject to conditions of approval 6 The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record. Fmdmg: The proposed subdivision will not conflict with existing easements,but rather will expand and provide all necessary easements. 7 The proposed subdivision is not premature A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists a Lack of adequate storm water drainage b. Lack of adequate roads c Lack of adequate salutary sewer systems d Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. Finding: The proposed subdivision is provided with adequate urban infrastructure VARIANCE FINDINGS Sec. 18-22. Variances. The City Council may grant a variance from the regulations contained in this chapter as part of the plat approval process following a finding that all of the following conditions exist. Variance Findings For Neck Lot Section 18-57 Streets (r) Flag lots may be permitted in residential districts with a density of less than four units per acre, if the criteria in variance Section 18-22 are met and upon consideration of the following (1) The prevailing development pattern makes it unfeasible or inappropriate to construct a public/private street In making this determination, the city may consider the location of existing property lines and homes, local or geographic conditions and the existence of wetlands Planning Commission Redstone Ridge—Planning Case 2015-08 April 7, 2015 Page 10 of 12 (2) After reviewing the surrounding area, it is concluded that an extension of the public or a private street system is not required to serve other parcels in the area, improve access, or to provide a street system consistent with the comprehensive plan (3) The use of a flag lot will permit enhanced protection of the city's natural resources, including wetlands and protected areas Staff reviewed the two possible plat layouts for the site and considered individual driveways off of a proposed cul-de-sac that can serve four home sites. Staff believes that the best option from an environmental standpoint is the neck lot option The option of a public street and cul-de-sac serving the parcel requires severe grading of the site. Staff is recommending approval of the neck lot. Variance Findings Within Subdivisions The city may grant a variance from the regulations of the subdivision ordinance as part of the plat approval process following a finding that all of the following conditions exist. 1) The hardship is not a mere inconvenience Finding: The hardship is not a mere inconvenience. The proposed neck lot preserves significant site features. 2) The hardship is caused by the particular physical surroundings, shape or typographical conditions of the land Fmding: The hardship is caused by the particular physical surroundings, shape and topographical conditions of the land. 3) The conditions upon which the request is based are unique and not generally applicable to other property Finding: The conditions upon which the request is based are unique and not generally applicable to other properties due to the unique site features 4) The granting of the variance will not be substantially detrimental to the public welfare and is in accord with the purpose and intent of this chapter,the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan Fmding: The granting of a variance will not be substantially detrimental to the public welfare and is in accord with the purpose and intent of this chapter,the zoning ordinance, and comprehensive plan The applicant is proposing to create one neck lot This option will minimize grading and tree removal The applicant's request is reasonable Staff is recommending approval of this request. Planning Commission Redstone Ridge—Planning Case 2015-08 April 7, 2015 Page 11 of 12 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the following motion "The Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve Preliminary Plat with a Variance for the use of a neck lot,to replat of 2 74 acres into four lots, Redstone Ridge, as shown in plans dated received February 14, 2015, including the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation, subject to the following conditions. Park and Trail Conditions 1 Full park fees m lieu of additional parkland dedication and/or trail construction shall be collected as a condition of approval for Redstone Ridge for the two new housmg units only The park fees will be collected in full at the rate in force upon final plat submission and approval. Based upon the city's 2015 single-family park fee of$5,800 per unit,the total park fees for Redstone Ridge would be$11,600 Engineering Conditions. 1 The plans shall show the first-floor elevations of existing buildings on adjacent properties. 2 The grading plans shall be revised to show the proposed elevations at each lot corner and at the corners of the proposed structures 3 Draintile service must be provided for Lots 1 and 2 where runoff will flow from the back to the front of the lot 4. A soils report is required indicating soil conditions, permeability, slope and water level if detected. 5 The plan must indicate that all swales discharging off site are to have the final 200 feet stabilized and the method to be used 6 The silt fence must comply with City Detail 5300 which requires the use of metal tee-posts. 7 The silt fence shown across Lots 3 and 4 must be placed twenty(20) feet from the top of the bluff to ensure that entire bluff impact zone is protected 8 Inlet protection shall be shown on all existing catch basins with the potential to receive runoff from the site or tracked material 9. Plan must demonstrate the placement of a rock construction entrance and include a detail 10 A note shall be made that no less than six (6) inches of topsoil, meeting the MnDOT specifications for 3877 2 Loam Topsoil Borrow must be placed to achieve the final grade and prior to the placement of any sod Planning Commission Redstone Ridge—Planning Case 2015-08 April 7, 2015 Page 12 of 12 11 The plan must show a stockpile area for stripped topsoil 12. The erosion escrow shall be required reflecting the quantity of topsoil necessary to place six (6) inches over Lots 1 and 2 excluding the 25%hardcover allowed with the Development Contract 13 The grading plan shall label the elevation at the centerline of the proposed driveways 14 The plan must label the proposed grade of the new driveway for the home on Lot 3. 15 The new driveway pavement being installed at Lot 3 may not exceed a width of 50 feet. 16 Escrow for the construction of the new sanitary sewer and water services and the associated restoration of part of Teton Lane will be collected with the Development Contract 17 Surface Water Management Utility fees totaling$6,025.80 shall be due at final plat. 18 Partial water and sewer hookup fees will be due at the time of final plat, the remaining hook- up fees will be due with the building permit The fees will be assessed at the rate in effect at that time. Environmental Resource Conditions 1. Tree protection fencing will be required at the edge of grading limits near any preserved trees. It shall be installed prior to grading 2. Each lot will be required to have a minimum of one tree in the front yard. Planning Conditions 1 Approval of the subdivision is contingent on approval of the right-of-way vacation 2 All lots must maintain a maximum hard surface coverage of 25% " ATTACHMENTS 1 Findings of Fact 2. Application 3 Reduced Copy Preliminary Plat 4. Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Mailing g\plan\2015 planning cases\2015-08 redstone ridge sub var vac\staff report pc doe CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES,MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE Application of Chris May for the following 1. Preliminary Plat to replat of 2.74 acres into four lots with a variance to allow a neck lot— Redstone Ridge On April 7, 2015, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Chris May for a Preliminary Plat with a variance—Redstone Ridge (Planning Case 2015-08). The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed subdivision preceded by published and mailed notice The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following. FINDINGS OF FACT 1 The property is currently zoned RSF, Single Family Residential District 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential Low Density(Net Density 1.2— 4 0 units per acre) 3. The legal description of the property is shown on the attached Exhibit A. 4. The Subdivision Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider seven possible adverse affects of the proposed subdivision The seven(7) affects and our findings regarding them are. a) The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance b) The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; c) The physical characteristics of the site,including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development, d) The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; e) The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage, 0 The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record. 1 g) The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists 1 Lack of adequate storm water drainage. 2 Lack of adequate roads 3. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. 4 Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. 5. In evaluating a variance, the city shall consider the development's compliance with the following. Section 18-57 Streets (r) Flag lots may be permitted in residential districts with a density of less than four units per acre, if the criteria in variance section 18-22 are met and upon consideration of the following (1) The prevailing development pattern makes it unfeasible or inappropriate to construct a public/private street In making this detennination, the city may consider the location of existing property lines and homes, local or geographic conditions and the existence of wetlands (2) After reviewing the surrounding area, it is concluded that an extension of the public or a private street system is not required to serve other parcels in the area, improve access, or to provide a street system consistent with the comprehensive plan (3) The use of a flag lot will permit enhanced protection of the city's natural resources, including wetlands and protected areas. 6 Sec. 18-22. Variances. The city council may grant a variance from the regulations contained in this chapter as part of the plat approval process following a finding that all of the following conditions exist 1) The hardship is not a mere inconvenience. 2) The hardship is caused by the particular physical surroundings, shape or typographical conditions of the land. 3) The conditions upon which the request is based are unique and not generally applicable to other property 4) The granting of the variance will not be substantially detrimental to the public welfare and is in accord with the purpose and intent of this chapter,the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan 7 The planning report#2015-08, dated April 7, 2015,prepared by Sharmeen Al-Jaff, et al, is incorporated herein. 2 RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat with a Variance for the use of a neck lot,to replat of 2.74 acres into four lots, Redstone Ridge, as shown in plans dated received February 14, 2015 ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 7th day of April, 2015 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY• Its Chairman 3 Note• Proposed Building Pads Shown are 60' X 60' Surveyor's Note. The metes and bounds portion of this legal description does not fit the property as monumented. All of the exterior boundaries are common with CURRY FARMS and CURRY FARMS 2ND ADDITION This survey is consistant with the plat PROPERTY DESCRIPTION. Outlot B and Lot 6, Block 2, CURRY FARMS 2ND ADDITION, Carver County, Minnesota AND Tract B, Registered Land Survey No 27, Carver County, Minnesota AND That part of the East Ha/f of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 116, Range 23, described as follows. Commencing at a point on the West line of the East one half of the East one half of the said Northwest Quarter of said Section 2 which point is 1244 43 feet South of the North line of said Northwest Quarter, thence West and parallel with the North line of said Northwest Quarter 75 feet; thence South and parallel with the East line of said Northwest Quarter 250 feet; thence East and parallel with the North line of said Northwest Quarter 190 feet, thence North and parallel with the East line of said Northwest Quarter 501 5 feet; thence West and parallel with the North line of said Northwest Quarter to the West line of the Eost one ha/f of the East one half of said Northwest Quarter; thence South along the said West line of the said East one half of East one half of Northwest Quarter to place of beginning PROPOSED VA CA TED TE TON LANE That part of Teton Lane that lies. 1) Easterly of the Northeasterly extension of the Northerly line of Lot 6, Block 2, CURRY FARMS 2ND ADDITION, Carver County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plot thereof 2)Southerly of the Westerly extension of the North line of Outlot B of said CURRY FARMS 2ND ADDI TION 3) Northerly of the Westerly extension of the South line of said Outlot B. AND 4) Westerly of the West line of said Outlot B '11T"1 OFCAANHT1SSe1 RECEIVED FEB 1 3 2015 eituitimsimommog Section 3: Property Owner and Applicant Information APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct Name Chris May Contact Address 6400 Teton Lane Phone City/State/Zip Chanhassen, MN 55317 Cell (612)386-5055 Email egi,tyy.27e 7a!,00.Cop- Fax Signature Date 2'1/-/r" PROPERTY OWNER In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. i will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees,feasibility studies, etc with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct Name Chris May Contact Address 6400 Teton Lane Phone City/State/Zip Chanhassen, MN 55317 Cell (612)386-5055 Email . , a-Ployya74r y r`job •CO/n— Fax Signature Date i—/I— IS— This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application � I PROJECT ENGINEER(if applicable) Name Otto Associates Engineers&Land Surveyors, inc Contact Paul E Otto, PLS, PE Address 9 West Division Street Phone (763)682-4727 City/State/Zip Buffalo, MN 55313Cell (763)439-4115 Email paul@ottoassociates corn Fax (763)682-3522 Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? *Other Contact information: © Property Owner Via ❑ Email ® Mailed Paper Copy Name ❑✓ A• pplicant Via ❑ Email ❑✓ Mailed Paper Copy Address ® Engineer Via El Email El Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip SII ❑ O• ther* Via ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email 1�c�;c�[1f rr�;'%:'rya Ai hF1c�. °�� t1vP}rl kf' c r rGEP��,rcprl APPLICANT OTHER THAW PROPERTY OWNER In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc with an estimate pnor to any authorization to proceed with the study I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct Name Chris May Contact 6400 Teton Lane Address Phone City/State/Zip Chanhassen,MN 55317 Cell. (612)386-5055 Email eirkty 61,Z7 .moo Fax 61_, Signature. / Date 2�'/�P/S"'�' PROPERTY OWNER. In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to,and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees,feasibility studies, etc with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct Name Chris May Contact Address 6400 Teton Lane Phone City/State/Zip. Chanhassen, MN 55317 Cell (612)386-5055 Emailmss' a 7 y,..p, 4 o :Gorr- Fax Signature Date A j This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application PROJECT ENGINEER(if applicable) Name Otto Associates Engineers&Land Surveyors, Inc Contact Paul E Otto, PLS,PE Address. 9 West Division Street Phone (763)682-4727 City/State/Zip Buffalo, MN 55313 Cell (763)4394115 Email Paul@ottoassociates corn Fax (763)682-3522 Section 4: Notific ,aoninfO ria ion �r. Who should receive copies of staff reports? *Other Contact information © Property Owner Via ❑ Email ® Mailed Paper Copy Name. 0 Applicant Via 0 Email Q Mailed Paper Copy Address ® Engineer Via ❑✓ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip O Other" Via ❑ Email 0 Mailed Paper Copy Email SCANNED .:� �: , Existing CB Rim=1000.16- owes CITYOFCHANNASSEt' Inv=99576 .4RELIVED i. 7000,75 X1000. 4 Son MH _ N88.4617 W 091:2Q-..„,..._Line parallel to the North line of the Rim=100035-,--- .-+� -'F •'4899 /1__ ,,� /. NW 1/4 of Sec.2 T 116,R 23 Inv--98729 at/ i�---`?!�4. ��'/'p=e_C}4. \ \Detail A 0 PROPOSED VACATED STREET '7 2_ 7g§51 SS S / h - Son MH FE 13 Z(115 SEE DETAIL 8-- - - ..1(00Q, l / �Sq :.+ -Rim=994.92 \ in ,,,,A •''•'., Benchmark. =12449 100 .-�-i- • ..• 6'1.58 ___..._ NH ^\ C=17.58-ice--.:n�, I X548;7404.1 948.74 7J6 a-7� Elevation=99895 \ p N R-812 1 / "'- r g6-OUILQT B �s,ii_ a,N...,,,,‘,..., 9 (N.C.V.D. 1929) S No Scale Fence 38 lent South • D - A /net Eost o!property -e .._. r.. ��, '1--X I— X Tel 7,461 Termed. . S 99D.4B Corner loll= I CHANHA N P1J�NNING DEPT 99.2/ 999 r3 I Fe ce- X.9: 'i: ss2s8,30ys275ence 3f/ !prpp1yJ• m • 98908/ • X9970BSonMH / • J( .b x My=97253 Rim=99892---, �+ A '7' �' - I \ rO X999.11W3 \ AREA=274 ACRES Inv=988.06 \ /�`�' \ ! I PROPOSED I P I.. ,— �" ZONING=RSF-RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY / / Cs /I. / p \ HOUSE PAD \ m I ..G, . • ,99y4`�� 56 Xn\ �� 5 Rise, 007.E x e Sr,eagi¢ 4„,.064499.06 ''' M1A 0 k / ` - -7002- J I X 4= i — 1012 —denotes Existing Contour \699 9 4 ;.It 1i.r104 U� Detail B X9Spot ExistingCB .2'CP Q' �7 I 100360 denotes Existing Elevation Rim=1000,75-., s gg:� yYl \ Area = 15,128.52 SF I denotes Honf Benchmark Inv=996.95 '\ ,,/r'/7/J9%c' 450 X5,0(60 X100281,1� X1002.91 X1002.8 �o Eee,tion-1006,65 t�. 99967 /S \, .•' (.i 9. 5, O a 3 •\�i —0 8)12„"9030——_I 1\ mo O ...-Nor• th Line fol Oudotension !the '4� denotes Water Shut tree I N.GV,D 1929 S '�• . II - o • No Sca/e ( ) yS4 * •-3 PROPQSCD •, ,- -1004 0 pry I - CURRY FARMS 2ND ADDIT/gy *7 denotes coniferous and tog numbn 1 \ ,�( �_T'/ ♦ , j vHOUSE D m I x wt / N88'46•111V 9 .„,./-'6,V" `� A 1 y / s� _ denotes deciduous tree ontl to Son MH S �"\,06, 00 �00 '�; x` .79a X1004.55 RI X70047 0 c� 1816 �8g number v 1 Rim=1001.93--�:-+0014• ;,� Z a \0 1\X1014 o� 'ort ¢ I ST denotes Storm Sewer 1 i rat q I I . Fountom- \ I 34` '00 h VACA DPROPOSED STREET I\ W" —55 — denotes Sanitary Sewer x 1/ (� 1006 I 1 !00249 €; 55 ,��1ePnone X7901:3 i i :.� 'J lOp4'x F%/ 1115.08X IX �� _ 0 49568 S F- —denotes Building Setback line RJ" o AAA V �' 9 b ARES= I B%d g e Q..• 004.10 X1006,60 Ix •'Q, I 1 RCP- .;,.. .. I / 00 =JO 1002 "0 7 1100 A 4 60 Wl line o!the E l/ /me '9" Front .. O -I 8111 F-v` .\ I - Side t=IO 7 .l 4 a N 3877'E JJ 2 "�'�' 4e. 1 E 1/2 0!the NW lrf4 0/ x X100708 I --, Reor=30 Existing CB /00232, �'niofk 9nti / ..•300 c s \�� , Sec,2 T 116,R 23. 1008 / �_ Y extension o/ oho Bluff=JO • -Raver * / \ \ µhe fSoufh Line of 2t; Rim=1000.67-•- $e p / X10 li 9 y •r I 8¢ .ev�- e \ 1�d.\\ eq=.21058.0` SF �.� I l Ouflot B,CURRY v.p 1nr98727 „„........---x101784 -• �X10o4.96 I XIO 03 oN j f FARMS 2ND ADDIBON a�Q m ,T=40,41, * „6 46 p ., 1 r / I I l x \ �. X1008.80 I , \l Northeasterly extension t.N 2 �' _ a c f #/f// r,-,'1v �� Y Retool a Wall 1010�I `` '-e /..._o!the Northerly Lme o/ "�N Note Proposed Building Pods Shown ore 60'X 60' J X 1008.751 l Lot 6 Block 2 CURRY 3 of A I I O FARMS 2ND ADDITION FF=1004.81-..�� I op\� ,� I / - -1I_--27,18:2-1. - er-+.,...CJI• 1 / -” ,,i FF=/006,34 <n/-- V u X X1004,53 8 �"/�5f Existing House E \ 7 - i3o- ----_ x 1 E�' oa •L., /\ \' ,y' \� �,�9,. �278$j E 12!24 -�-'71i ,L,,,,,77:1‘;'-"z:o °�n Surveyors Note a02 X1004.38 ` ..� '�"—d,' �� o o I ry/ Ti•o I / 00m r`�\I 10 o o X101155 X10116 .Q1.6..'\,1; `I o 7 i\oo I a The metes and bounds portion of this legal description does [ '. FF=1006.25-' ` 0 ' I \ L n: 1244.43 feet South o/ °v I� I - �\ "� 19 °� not fit the property as monumentedithCU All of the exterior Existing House ,y.' 7 Fen a- -, p•.•ITe!ta"fh N '2'line o/ ''4'' P P Y mI AA I z •(Pill''''''-. A, - e NW 1/4 of Sec.2.7 /1 I o = boundaries ore common with CURRY FARMS and CURRY \R \X1000.53. °i .Lf `""7006 +J�`' S / R 73 'i I DRAINAGEFARMS 2ND ADDITION This survey/s consistont with the plot GV ..."-=q9749-... F-$9748 Pa ers X1012 Bl X1012 95 0 AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS. X996.58 Fea = 26,290.31 S. II t -998 X1003.05 ,_., .. $ , *5X1006 58 i _ 7 1I 5 ..{ _. -. I 's Area _I ._Lona -... _ . o/ 1 I— I 71X •t m I 5J 5 h o\ I r 1,':o III -1 - ', I.X70..,,N \X1003^lp\{1. • - 57191 041 S.F 5X1013 41 o I r_ `9`'�'. `_ e '^� �\`�I` - Existing House /-Window Well � :• I ^o I ---- -____i -J L___1____ PROPERTY DESCRIPTION -- _ ';o iia P• -.I 9 4,; 111EEE�5 ',Cone. •6 o -- — 9�s \ - e \ `��..% 9 - *65I I Q I Outlot B and Lot 6, Block 2, CURRY FARMS 2ND ADDITION Carver County, Minnesota f . ,c`ar'p• j.*7 1001 4 \ o 1012 I ' BEING 10 FL IN WIDTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND .1^ 16 ,•!"$1 $ , c e \/ n I AND ADJOINING RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES,AND BEING 5 FEET IN �o I�"7 WIDTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED AND ADJOINING LOT 9 \ L ndscoprrtq�•' ,- — .I I \ - 6 Reta for /070 ,¢ i ,• � 'q LINES, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT Tract B Registered Land SurveyNo, 27, Carver CountyMinnesota X1005,09 l -9 I *'63 * \ X70 35 7 // •(°4n I , ' 9 (7 / - U�671X I I AND GI • j - - -, -- 9646 �' I '''�\ e I W> ioucrs- .�. �p�' X10 502 '�// /' �` Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2 Township 116 Range 23, \ /o• __ 0 rs_noo a2X ' -P o Da 22 described os follows \ .,� O 0.30 \ stew t0 999.38/ That port of the East shi one ' 1 .. \` � \ \ Oz\ I ..f-I flJz -ss-'v9 P• C(--- -Btu Ln 1003.lOX ,�2a Commencing at o point on the West line of the East one half of the Eost one half of Pone J, StCr M j0. `- -990 98249 6 a � i'�X,DDo° _ 996' t//C/N/TY MAP the sold Northwest Quarter of sold Section 2 which point is 1244.43 feet South of the North line of said Northwest Quarter Rim=979 8--„-. 1 1 _ 6- 2rOo,Y4, 994 no scale /p,� I vs97?.SJ .-._Seg D tad A.... 9,6 x..033 .34 • A31 992 .�.. of sold X961.;18,,p,.....„:„..„1972 `Sr. • \ ` \ 98Y j 35 1 a i i w -990 ce West with the North �._� . -- .D Via .n Northwest Quarter 250 feet thence thence East nand po�olleldw�hr the/North!tine o/ssold a ... 986 ; c - ,,,•.::` Northwest Quarter 190 feet, thence North and parallel wdh the East line of said t. s76 4• ,Y5 - ..p3 & ,. _ _ 440 I f Z1, Northwest Quarter 5015 feet thence West and parallel with the North line of said ". s 1 - ¢� O . _45" .984 N,ln, Northwest Quarter to the West line of the East one half of the Eost one half of said ... 974 IZ8 CA,. I 4 38 . •_-, �. O 982_ m,. Aa '040 9 0 7 E Northwestalt ofr thence South along the said West line of the said East one half of Storm• MH -. y�j. x - 1 y46 'i — --5 Rspr-` ce on properly ene - ,,�,,,,,r. �.' ostoneholt Northwest Quarter to place of beginning Rina-97462\ '4, \� / :�Fen'de' nproperly/ne 047 46.0 O /8976 Fen , N.Inv-x.166.97, --970�,�s4< 7 __ 3B Ij W Inv-959.$0.., . 3t,P°R /I. X10 O - _ 676.- -s ;, E Inv-959.42 - ""' 968 �t - E.• > -'=,:;;t - PROPOSED VACATED TETON LANE - 96696487X�` h._ F IN88°3970"E 140,00-966�, .o tine prone!to the North line of the ' ' Line parallel to the Eost line of the 7 ,Br X96345 Fence 982„ 964 \_ 68 ` NW"1/4 of-Sec,2 T 116 R 23 - That part °I Teton Lane that lies NW 1/4 of Sec 1 T 116 R 21- •• X96117 "' \ \3t / 960- - Northerly Line ort/of D CURRY FARMS \ ,� \ 1)Easterly of the Northeasterly extension of the Northerly Gne of Lot 6 Block 2 CURRY -' /\ N �` _ FARMS 2ND ADDITION, Carver County, Minnesota occordmg to the recorded plot thereof / sr / /\ \ N \ 0 sl 2)FARMSr/y of the Westerly extension of the North line of Outlot B of said CURRY so FARMS 2ND ADDITION Inv=958.07--1• Pond N \ \ ' .• � 3)Northerly of the Westerly extension of the South line of said Outlot B J // \ \ \'`, \ t AND 7 g 4)Westerly of the West line of said Outlot B CAN I SCAN f'.. 1 REV NO. DATE BY DESCRIPTION DESIGNED DRAWN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR www ottoassociates.com R E D S T O N E RIDGE UNDER M7 DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT AM A DULY PROJECT NO, P E 0 T J.B REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF 9 West Division Street PRELIMINARY PLAT 14-0135 THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. /) �Z". TTo CHRIS MAY _ CHECKED 7-fJ(// Buffalo,MN 55313 (763)682-4727 P E O. POUT E Otto SSstoveyS Fax(763)682-3522 CHANHASSEN, MN DATE DATE, 7-13-15 LICENSE NO. 40062 Engineers 8 Land Surveyors Inc- SHEET NO 1 OF 4 SHEETS 2-12-15 , .�k29vbtarJLf6:Ostsa Nli.-41,1 iasetwaamall4yyoyly Existing CB / 7E5-1(00.16- 1000.86 - --- lnv=995.2 _ 1000.75 2<7000.741] \ MH / 1 ' 9g7 ZO ft,-8Z235---I '-'Ss SS \\� /n r-987.29 \ i , by o X999.61 SS j'''''L----SS _ __ ti h ry� Son :14. 9 \ \\ -- -S$ � Rim=994.92 1000.1!/---- ___.-_,_-__--� / en Benchmark' l 1 • o �•�6fiv0 X____ �_..._ Elevotron=99 S' / 895 X998.74 / y • \� (N.G.V.D 1929) //:999I 8 I �r� \• \ ',/ .471 ' 7000 �+ \ 99048 SS 999.21.by y/ 1." �, y�9s qq`1' / A Existing CB J 4z °�''� .I Rrm-998.30-- / X9958 ''''..;'<i X / SS /nv 99275 •� / // e \a q \ Existin CB '.O.T X998.95 'syr m k!!!!'-:. \ Rrm998.35 - / -,/ y"' I O1 \989.08 S Inv=994.07 \ / \ ` \ \/ N ♦. !.,i, '?i, X99708 em S \_ - )0P 1‘ San.MH • TF=996.3 Rim=998.92 - \ 7, y , y 996.30\rte` i 99 Inv-988.06 / /''1 e7 �. O m o Olt.: 'RI C 0 30 60 Feet 999.06:/ % 7.• 0 i, a / 99.7 * .01 i�o4 .IPM .. ` X W 2... Existing CB / 6 y'c \ \ X/003.0 Rim=1000.75 / ZS 99\ \ O S�iA 1 7002 ¢0. . Benchmark /nr-996.95 \ 7// X974 X1000 X1002.82- 1 r.NH \ 5q i X7002.97 \ Devotion= \ yy yt °2 \ LEGEND roo66s9 B (NGV.D. 1919) `\ ,� s Id 3 1004 \ #53 190<�'^.. -..,-.. `\ y SF SF- denotes sill /ante to be installed prior to construction ZZ San.MH / / 624' {( C.010038 ��0;471'774!...." 04.51 X100475 Rim=1001.93-._ / y J��,o��+;/ 0� NO '2 1F-!005.8 •X700-2� ��, -1000- denotes proposed contour 1001.4,._ �' 4 " b1,. LL.0994,8 I \ - X1004.3 denotes spot elevation _ - /y Z 3 •.... FB I proposed i-1 yy s ��•. XI001�}71. 7pOf..... 1 i.: denote p op sed dror g 100249- t I`0. CS 0,7 as i 3 Z X 'O\....\,??...'004.10 1 \661y / X1006.60 �'u-�s s r o no e / SS .,.7mOJ/ .". ".' 00,,,,.., 004'. / ,..,. S'. .gyp X700708 1002.32 .. 'o 5(Y .... 100.4 - 10 08 0- -outside grode elevation ionO -.._ X7003.67 9 ' / X100310 *:F0 I / ##nO X04.96X X1006.4- \(r ,_ ",., X1008.80 X1009. 0=10115 gor096 e/erotiOs � oundof ation elevation, L=1005.0 / level elevation�tNB- \ X1008.75LO off, P, . ; i?C dippr , ' ' FF=1006.34-' X \ home type, h "`l X1004.53 #51 Existing House o 1 FB- Iulll basement o y' 1....._..,;,,.. x ..ACK X1004 JB • z.0 t `7Ap2 * o • & / X1017.55 X101162 ' 60'Ovide x 60 deep house pod FF=1006.25-/ ," I UQ 57. 0�0� } $ ' 1\`. Existing Ho!.se'., ,, \ --,_ X 58 I / .... t.o a #5. ." \1 o4 0 N. X1000.53 \ ‘0-___ /F.098149--J • -F, / X101297 X996.58 _ X10,295 1� ' I • r --'998- \ X100305 " 2 `-7 #5 X1006.58 I ( NOTE. 3 o i ._. ..... ..__ . _ if i "- - --- --- -.595.77X r. ( '•13 _ THIS PLAN SHOWS THE PROPOSED FINAL HOUSE GRADING FOR THE PROPOSED LOTS. k -- 9y , I Oy X1003.70 .7p ® \'-FF=1014.61 X107314 X100115 , • • �.,s \ {F I g #75 Ouse 66 ` to9 H I gym ` \ \ / ' I -- \ \ \ # e #65 / 5 MIN LENGTH POST i Foes \ -79 ... 109 AT 4 MAX SPACING - 4 X100136 b.. 16 9•: _.7 ^ GEOTEXTILE FABRIC _ -"' \ y z FABRIC ANCHORAGETRENCH \' DIRECTION OF BACKFILL WITH TAMPED --_ _ , \ '�, #b3 ' X1005.09 X1005.35 ' ` ap RUNOFF FLOW NATURAL SOIL p� v� \ \ \\ *62\ ,;7` 4006.71X 7/// I �U z ..s64, . , \ \ \ .,\ ...\ \ .1‘,„., \•0 \ 4." X7005.02 / 962 \ `+, - \, ., w -M1-._ O. Io00.82X � .1004,... /X999 J8 w �, ' \ ._ .. 30 \ .-. 1003 10X 22 Af"/ Pond st i n H ,. o '\ 20 O g2 s96 �� oa2.. ---,-13 2s 0/4 SILT FENCE DETAIL J R =97($78`. 99y/ � JI env=972.5 �, , � \ ..- .__988. .. ... -SF-SF-SF-DENOTES SILT FENCE '''-.-...% .`: `' 986 0 JJ - 34 ` - \ .. ,.• 9 2 X96//8" -- S7.\ t \ \ 984 ‘;I!- 35 _ .- -, _..,. „ - I ., X962.96 1S'' \ ` 't71 v ain I r 988 . \ ST ', ..974 .. ..Y �.._ .. QQ .. ... .... 98? .. Storm MH 1 Sr _ • ... r ..._ Rim-9X4 62 T-.. g.. _ i N.Inv.-968497- ._.' .._.. ..0 41 .q7 i ....... W I a-95.50 ` ST .. .. \ E Inv 9 .42'- �--- 4�' ,,.. _ '6510 - 0.•iD �_ _ 0 49.. ,b-0 6. !eh: A?' • pe X9 r.. p 0 ..'o •.�_. �, §.J -96''''' .. ...._ \ 964.87X \ ._._ ...._... �6tP \ ..` �� $7' X963.45 -... � , N REV NO. DATE BY DESCRIPTION DESIGNED DRAWN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR wwty ottoassoc,ates.com UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I T A DULY R E D S TO N E RIDGE PROJECT NO. PEO TJ.B REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF 9WestDivisionStreet SECONDARY GRADING PLAN 14-0135 - THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. f CHECKED G 0 TTo (763)682-0727Buffalo,MN 55313 CHRIS MAY P E 0 Poul E Otto MOANS Fax(763)682-3522 DATE DATE. 2-13-15 LICENSE NO 40062 Engineers&Land Surveyors,Inc. CHANHASSEN, MN SHEET NO 2 OF 4 SHEETS 2-12-15 - _ _ Existing CB ..,.... .. Rim=1000 I6- lnv-99526 -� --1 I Son MN EXISTING SERVICES TO BE RELOCATED. THEN USED FOR PROPOSED LOT 1 Inv=98729 ---_____w ___.-Son MH ---'---w R/m=994.92 i ; ' W W Benchmark M 1 T.KH _ E/emotion=998.95 I I _ y' (NG.✓.D 1929) II I h I 3 I W Existing CB I W Rim=998.30-- I Inv=992 75 -s. 3 `\ 1 9.OX lY Existing CB �— Rim=998.35 \ / I \ Inv=994.07 .-.• \ 1 Ly A "WIN\• \ 3 Ya 0-1004.0 \ 1 Son AN \ \ o LL-99.3 Rim=99..92 - '\ �4 LL=996,30 Inv=988.06 "\ A. a WO 11 STREET RESTORATION '\ E m SHALL BE PER CITY ` 2 4i DETAIL 5201A Aildi r _ 0 so so U Fee I AIIMIIIIVNW Existing CB ` Rim=1000.75- i ,nv=996.95 . TN.H. hmork \ \ -� 1+37 i Eiewtion=1006.65 \ .� 989 74 iE (N.G.VD 1979) '\ / \� I \ ` I . 9+ i Son MH \ "92 8' TF.1038 005.8 Rim:1001.93_..- LL 994.6 Inv.=99748 \ / a* PB994.� I i %*.. � ! 2 1 / I . ..--7.- I 1\ W I I 1 I 1 j J 7 7 FF-1006.34 IExisting House 0 5Ol� FF=1006.25-/ 0�4 s Existing House PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY 4 A THE LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL FF=99749-! TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 II GOVERNING SPECIFICADONS. II IX ! 1 THE 2005 EDITION OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 11 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION -FF=1014,61 2 CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM) STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICA TIONS Existing Nouse 3 CITY OF CHANHASSEN STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS&DETAIL PLATES. e NOTES I c 1 SANITARY SERVICES SHALL BE 6' PVC SDR 26&SHALL BE LOCATED 3 FEET DOWNSTREAM OF WATER SERVICES j I 0 2 WATER SERVICES SHALL BE I"COPPER WITH I"CORP 3. ALL UTILITIES CROSSING WA TERMAIN SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM IOF 18 VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN PIPES. i; 1 1 IPone Storm MH I Rim=979.78- _ Inv-972.53 N.N. I IStorm MH i SCANNED Rim-974.62 I N.Inv=96..97-i 1 W Inv=959.50 E Inv=959.42 REV NO DATE BY DESCRIPTION DESIGNED DRAWN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR www.ottoassociates.com PROJECT NO UNDER DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REDSTONE RIDGE PRELIMINARY UTILITY LAYOUT ' — P E 0 T J.B REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL E NAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF 9 West Division Street 14-0135 THE STATE OF MINNESOTA Buffalo,MN 55313 CHECKED Z-0, TTO (763)6824727 CHRIS MAY P E 0 Poul E Otto 880CIATEB Fax(763)682-3522 DATE 2-1J-15 LICENSE NO 40062 Engineers&Land Surveyors,Inc. CHANHASSEN, MN SHEET NO 3 OF 4 SHEETS DATE 2-12-15 • Exlathe CB / R1m�1000.16- v,. rev.,• , San. ,, --p--ss Bretton San./00r135-- �: — -_5 _ St MH /Ai 4411111 / —SS — -Rin.99192 Benchmark' �` T.M Ohatke- � Ire.Tog j 7Y.. Wee L l The Condition Spa Rernow A. (NQY.0. 1929) 1 Green ash 15 F X •'I - 2 Green ash 31 F X A ik / �/ - 3 aeon cab 14 ' F X i" 4 CoxNds' 25 F X Existing CB ay 5 Colorado bA»spruce 60 F X Rem-99530-..-.� 1nw99275 \ / / - 6 Green ah 17 F X 11110111111r— nnI' � SS 7 Rd maple 13 F X 30 60 Feet fidsf.h9 CB �(.! �l Rin.99&35 -� /...." � / I �1 I .. 8 N .spruce ?6 F X in.-994.O7 9 MonM.spruce 36 F x ` 99&92 I — 10 NM.spruce 31 F x he.96506 I 11 Mbit.spruce 34 F X I 12 Colorado blue spruce 38 F X *5B / iJ Colorado blue spruce 40 F X / , // f 14 Colorado due Spruce 38 F X EAU g� *55 O ,/ 15 Colorado Mie spruce 24 F X # / 1 �� ... - . M 16 Colorado Mi spruce 28 F X TBenNrnok Mw \ *54 O 2 , / 17 Colorado MN. wua 26 F X QiwvBa i1 � \ /`'' '� 4 3 18 Colorado Mt.goruc. 24 F X DtaYJI 1929) / *s ►"� 10 Colorado Mi.spruce 23 F X S�MH ` ¢ / 52P�p,10------ 6 •�� t P X R,,,./0DL93 do 4c \,.... * a ,p 6 �� < �`V` \\// � � ?e Rar9ld9r i? F x 4' \ / ' is I �-�� ` 2 50 Arborttta IS G X ta ° 0-.............. 4 i A _ 51 A.epr,na IS c x :---4(..-.7 ' 52 .spruce 21 F x 'g I *8 f l - NM 53 Mite spruce 20 F X d *9 I e 54 Mbit.spruce 19 F x 0 I / 55 Mbit.spruce 17 F X *to 1 / - 58 Mbit.spruce IS F X 4i *1t 1 ...--' 57 Areor,lta 19 0 x I / 58 sa Arborvitae 22 0 x ArborWtae 19 F X *at Maras A.... , - 60 Mantas20 F X 61 Colorado Mw spruce 22 F X 62 Colorado blue spruce 23 F X *57 63 Colorado blue spruce 22 P x 64 Colorado blue spruce 24 F X 4 36 * 65 Columnar abandons 24 0 x 60 68 Columnar abardtoe 24 0 X r 2 *5 3 ` *13 • atop Mover ee *iN.Q1 I c *95 • Tres inventory prepared by P *17 / I Heritage Shads hee Consultants Manuel Jordan, ISA Certified Arborist ON 0206 A P.a Box 26607 *u •L St. Louis Park MN 55426 ` *0 763-717-9366 • • Tree DBH ht the tree's diameter measured at 4.5 fest from the ground • • Ttee Conditions aro defined as: IN Jt �� CANOPY LINE 0- Good Condition, A healthy and structurally sound tree. O O� . r' BLUFF LINE S F-Fab*Condition. A tree looking h health and/or structurally deficient 77Ire e 0 -rr O but correctable. 20 O 32 • • ...wow4at � 4s O P-Poor Condition. A fres with significant health or structural dshcts 29 Awed --._,\ OO q1O 25O O 24 and difficult to correct the problem& =� 7 D-Dead or Ding. No chance to correct health or structural concern& .� O 33 uDp 35 43• Nota �\ 1 Some tree numbers ore not sequential due to them being originally tagged Q but aro within the bluff. Jo 44 0 \Sr O O 3e 45 . PRO•ECT AREA - 274 ACRES O - EXISTING BASE UNE CANOPY COVERAGE- 10 AME•S(3tww) Stam MH Sr 037 40 MINIMUM CANOPY COVERAGE REQUIRED- Q7 ACRES(25x) N Inv 68. C i� SWING CANOPY COVERAGE PRESERVED- Q9 ACRES(33X) w.In,-9s9.so sr \ O 0 46 O - NEW TREE COVERAGE REQUIRED 0 0 ACRES E 1nw959.42 - 57, NEW TREES REQUIRED- 1 FRONT YARD TREE PER LOT AT BUILDING PERMIT TIME o....,...,......- - 41' a, _« _ .. .-mi SCANS =6, REV.NO. DATE BY DESCRIPTION DESIGNED DRAWN I� t A I .M1Nv.ettaassacJates.tbrlr REDSTONE RIDGE TREE PRESERVATION PLAN PROJECT NO UNDER W DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I NA A DULY P.EO. T.J.B. REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF 9West Division Stmst CHECKED THE STATE OF I SO A. Buffalo,MN 55313 14-0135 P.E.O. 4.,,-,..., err°mums Fax:(72-4727 CHRIS MAY Fax:(763)682.3522 DATE' MTF• 8-93-16 IXMYSENO.400e5 Engineers 5Lend SO7VeYOs,Ina CHANHASSEN, MN SHEET NO. 4 OF 4 SHEETS 2-12-15 JERRY K &VALORIE A HARLOW JIMMY D SHADLER JOHN J SAVARINATHAN 6490 DEVONSHIRE DR 6450 BRETTON WAY 6360 TETON LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7539 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7507 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7527 JOHN W JR &SUSAN E KUNITZ JONATHAN L SCHARLAU KATHRYN P BROUGHTON 6441 BRETTON WAY 1291 STRATTON CT 1301 STRATTON CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7508 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7509 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7509 KENNETH F & PATRICIA J GARVIN LEONARD E &ANN B WARE MALCOLM K& MITRA P WHITLOCK 6390 TETON LN 1225 LILAC LN 6471 BRETTON WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7527 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9053 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7508 MARC E MEEDEN MARCUS R &JENNIFER A ZBINDEN MATTHEW A MCGEE 6481 BRETTON WAY 6460 BRETTON WAY 6398 TETON LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7508 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7507 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7527 MICHAEL J & ELIZABETH BRANDES MICHAEL R MENZEL MICHELLE M MERGEN 6411 TETON LN 6490 BRETTON WAY 1280 STRATTON CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8332 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7507 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7509 MONICA A WIANT NAOMI RUTH CARLSON PETER B & LEAH J THORSON 1385 ITHILIEN 5955 CATHCART DR 6370 TETON LN EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9032 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-8916 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7527 RHONDA C DOWNIE ROBERT L RABE RONALD C HAGLIND 6361 TETON LN 6307 TETON LN 6470 DEVONSHIRE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7528 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7528 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7539 SAMULE D TEUT SHARON MICHELLE O'BRIEN STEVEN B &ALLISON M WEICK 1311 ITHILIEN 6451 BRETTON WAY 6401 TETON LN EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9032 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7508 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8332 STEVEN R&SANDRA K KVIDERA SUZANNE B BLUESTEIN THOMAS & MOLLY BERGFALK 6510 DEVONSHIRE DR 6501 DEVONSHIRE DR 6461 BRETTON WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7537 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7541 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7508 THOMAS A PATTON THOMAS MAY TODD R& DIANE E GERHARDT 1310 STRATTON CT 6341 TETON LN 1330 STRATTON CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7509 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7528 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7509 CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on March 26, 2015, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for the Redstone Ridge-Planning Case 2015-08 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records ,-7/2a.,4_,,,c-t__ (-4-A-ere--11-0-t-lif' Kare J Engel ardt, Deputy Clerk Subscribed and sworn to before me this:;2011 day of I)All Yt {'1 , 2015. -, Notary Pu KIM T MEUWISSEN ,202o g-:.s",* Notary Public- � ta ago 3 ' .� MY commission 6.441.e6 r34. a) X Cn a) L D a) ° o o }� C Q) O y �, O N (ll w o >. o r c n Ci) 0 .- ..'C-+ O O mn �' i 7 �. . 00E ." m i D > m c O r 203 m m'� d co 7 O mn > .O Q (6 - O �_ .� c...gf).o naoEE , m '5om nc A+ O cn Q L U mU CO O O . U C O y O eco umEc >E PE? 2E onom CD co 0 — m0 Q) -O O .-, O O C (0 mn ,- -O C@cas m 5 H- aLoi N > m c c@ ,7', CW O C L Q. Q) C Q O Q O O O C EEc oDE °'m- 3E ��n> G LL 0) (13 � ti SOL "O O N (� � L >N E (0 >, • O C a`,Ua mUm�s mo� oE � o c -oC @ N m N C 0 " .--, U N 0_ (,) - C O O -0 . > D n 2-2== w-B-E--.282-,1, 2)E c m U-o co o p 0, 4- (ll V O O O O Q) 7 U O U C U y Q) > c_c° c 3 E - . .-'=.5a)_ -?.•2 § 2 ' 'o c m ^ L m6 C 0 (7 .O C O N 0_L O (0 mn C Q) L O U ,2 2 E o° m 5 a) w U > E i.. �/� N p Y y N C C- O �' 7 >,+ 7 0 N C C y �" � >.mmN3L0 ° u, o •V I .c L lL1 (U O 4-- O L C 0_ O C 2 E _, ..0 C L Q) y o 0 0.. E moa, L Cl) H - 0 0 7 fn C' O O U .�0-, UO C C ` C C Y > 10 3 nU o f°� m o- E al �_ N Q_ 0 O U Nm a ° rnLuo3 > s E p cc (Q �' `�' C O �,., C "-' .�-. O O O C .' Cel)" !n a_ O O E n m 10 H D o n rn°>s o 1.T Qp O CO" y C' C_ O 6 t -O O LSA O m E -0 - O (On a @Tc HUIDIUW E O p O O LO OO O (Q `� (6 o ami'�°OO0_! V) i UC -C0 -O m=8 O •� UXi 0 C N U 0 0) (1) Z y > N C O U O -' 73 O N O oac c > ma� mpm o 3 � `-0O"v COO C (U > •� C Q) i NO co O L O > > O C O O) r m a' r rn - c N N o-D > LC7 -o C d -0 C p 0_ 0 U 0_ C ,_ U mn 0_ O , 0 C < omg a316o „_, oLNom.. °c _� (� y J y 0 O O) _ 20 . y CV C 0. U Q UO Q (B U C U 2,..2 °m o o ct E n o' o m T m /� O 0__0 W w N 0 0 c ?i ..c & C y O m0 m > 'naam a a) E2'"a"U� li N (� ,a 0 C•DO 0 +�-' O U - O C (0 c O 0. (n ."C.., .� U C (0 a) g2 > m a c n m° E° 16 of m c Y o i� C N .0 _ O > O y (O C C O 55 N ) K E n E a�r E c 1O > o)10 in m o c ^O = ,7_ c' C - ~ - 0 „Sr O 0 _0)- U -,.=' C O C Q) _c 0 (0 >, > _� f0 O E (n m aci L n E 'o. E '&1 m c E N S a c M Q (1.) O 0_W O 16 c) a !n L 0- Q O -C O^+-' 3 0 (0 !n _ (n 0) C O Q o °- . o> o > n Eon °'-° V p U 9_ O Z >, d' E O w fn co" (� E U C V ..0 (0 3 C m6 0 O a�m m . ,y E D m m m d o °-_2' o n a c E O.. Q O 0 Q' -c -C O E O _U C m7) C U cm 5,3 13. $o nE wm>p m Anil O C Q) C o _c 0 7 O U O C C a) CO m 00-0 = 0. ,c--o aDi om ,7?) c = 7 0 co V a U C U (/) 1- O 0_ -c C tEL Q) E E U C Emc u 0,=' m , c 9 n c a`i m L-o p �-� (U W , p y D. O _ o E O ti Q � C E U owE �coEEN �Emnococn Z N�/� H @0C oW U COQ I- CO m0 0_N- NMd . N _oNL E --, O Qs- w _, O E >, m >n=U 0 a)c2Nn"° V/ 0 0) C '-' cmn�c£.o co N...▪r oE3c CU y Lr c O L U mva nEto'QaDi . 2-6-0 oo rnnm C C O E cl g 2c > 8-V;@=oac_mD°o� E 16a lJc1 d y C- O mn a) m m d mL-' m S'ono 2 U u)ci� n rn E ns /Y� _C •.. y; Q G1 y .N it o c C -c O n. >2-2 y c n m >.>,m 2-o o c a m `^v ~ Q co (0 `�' Q (0 2 CD O),7 O = a-(t15 ID 3 coL °m m�3mamm 2-Ey LSE' i 05 ++ V N a+ N E a,y C U > > nmD KT;g'c °o ai >N o�3 -=oo U w es(0 m.1 L2 Q Q- O �(jQ Z /CD E 7Y 0 m0 W Oren Ec,, =aLoco0 80 m 0 -J a Qac s? ma Cao I- azccu0 . > . > 0 L- 0- i O �, O 2A"UUoU >f- n >-fE2,_ ? ¢ Em a QQ) Q] N mL >. D Y 2 C OO ,n�y E -°mt o^D m}D) 3 � O U yOc + i 7Om `- O C rnro>oo � ommcotYO . i n > O n N ♦1.0 C LL L _� V U @ —a3 N N ... U C O m) "O odic ' NEo'E EE▪mace.oc°ia W CD T Lco (0 O) CV 0 (U O O C m0 mn 1- -O C � mc F- mNE > > cam °> >� N 0 Et O U) O V d �0 E L C > mn 0 C O C0 a>' o > m o >2 m c O O C L ' U C i Q vE O N E N EEG o Emm °E n o) as >, O (B 0 Q) O Oj � � > (0 C • O O E =, mm8m.= mou0EE0 ca > - E _c -c "O O (n C - E C E > m0 0 m De> E ?awcmGm —co as N C 0 E 0 Q) Q w C >i 0 p i > D �'- Hi !llRfl!n=.c E a s o a�> E' O t N C C ,O .�--, O O y U �, y (V O O C U y d d E y �L N H - 0 0 L 0 7 C cn 0. 0 (i .�--, I- 0 O f- O Y o m E D a3 p2 o p E o c m / co CU . (9 C�_' O' O O N -C N O c f a O C O a> n c ani ~2 o >.n c L t o W E -O O L- C p _C) C N C _ c -0 LO , flUh mo Lu m ° o c2 0p ~ O a E (0 O O a O r y N m`o Ea o' ° r T° oc O 'C_, Q) 4) C 0 C (0Cn 0C .0 p -O mLd o> OU.m a�°izno o9-7w v O h c0 L O Q) -O C y V C C 0 (U O C C m.‘1 m a U-_E a Eo m („°,a - ' (0 m�-0 C O O co (U jjH ! nr/ C CD O > Q O O Q m0 Q ca' oON11J ) OQ = O U E O up,-.2 `°m o o w E n o'"- oo m -m //�� 0_ N O C ,_ N ��, O) C y (0 'min 2 u,n> D m E m" E"02 li. N N 0 0 0 0 0 +�-' O U t ccs t' 0) O a y U C 3- CO O N cT)>2.c o D�'o f m 7°' °'`° o�Y o _ p 0 ti p) U - > 4) 0 4— 7 N > C O C N -0 � -5 (0 C O N mn - Cr E r.E ° ai ca>) N8Uam°o O i c C "R -t LL O 0) 0 to a) C 0 (0 >, O (0 Ct cot mE,'§Eo o ,n o ft ow A, 0. C 0 W N W O R O i- O C _� C N C > C -0 (n 4- _ O -C 0 .Q a E w . o a m E a u m IE. aoi N°-S o W _CU Q > O 0_Z p E y en 0- C = 0- Q) L .� ,. m0 m0 •-, L (n � C N ®< O oN y> 16n>.tE' - o n a� a-a)) N 0 ,a- 0 >, d' 0 in (0 0 O C O C (0 C O U > m >xmD > >> > s 1.� >+N = fl.Lj (0 CO C QQ) ,,_ O E U Q m0 N U (V _ d O ._ _c 0) 3 .02 9Eamoo= 2o•--)--, n cm .w O c = N C i 06 • p Q co- .-, U C tO L O - O 3 O U CO (0 � 0- N U C mn m-Uo 8 m U o D N on '',7 o .s-o m o C O C y 7 00 mn ,- V - C (.01._ 0 LL -C 7 0_ Q) E � � _ E U C ._T, Emc i>rno m > g5E-c v, gg Q) > C Q) 0_ O � OQ) r O N C n mc= coQncmcs �> Z ,A 0 Q) U LLL L Ccr) - _c 0__0 C >, O 0 >,N co N t C I _O U � - 3 g`co.� E ` mof6a m ° V/ I- N 0 Ore 0 COQ I- m0 (0 0_ N co d' 4-- 'Cy-. (/) -0 N E +-' - u O a' Er rn.can o orn - o OmN U i mn ..c 002 --o..� 0,°wY� LD E= oa coCO — N (6 Q) C � Emm o«�o E a> mo.. nL U cc 0) - c L O mDQ nEraoym7E? � 3 °'`00>2m .0 d d .� 0,5 0. O � mn Q) , ma m- m S" ono r U�au a 71 E nn E_ •.. y_; Q d y ry+ U C C _c o-- > 'Qo ya0inm >.w m�,o cd m o CU C C > 0 d C C O) p (n y y m� m w.C.- > > om > ~ma y O �' _ 7. Fs �(n ..0 3 o t m m a.o 3 22-w m n m `o t_�o,E Q O Q. C U - 5 acs o.a)4- acmi �mo3 @a a°) V �+ 0 a 0 O -C w d (U C �aE o . E ° gym ° > m as a+ 0 0 ,.0 O LLJ -6 92 z'i ALEJANDRO FERRER-MACHUCA ANDREW E & KARI L WEILEDER ANDREW G SEIFERT 6330 TETON LN PO BOX 221 1320 STRATTON CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7527 CHASKA, MN 55318-0221 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7509 BRENT W & DIANE E FESTER BRETT K STIER BRIAN D & DIANE S WYFFELS 6350 TETON LN 2211 HILLSBOROUGH RD APT 4108 6421 TETON LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7527 DURHAM, NC 27705-4164 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8332 BRUCE A&ANNETTE M KOTZIAN CARY LYNN &JOYCELN R HUGHES CHET T MASTELLER 1340 STRATTON CT 6480 BRETTON WAY 1311 STRATTON CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7509 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7507 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7509 CHRISTIAN S & MAUREEN CONNERY CHRISTOPHER G GIMSE CHRISTOPHER M HUBBY 6440 BRETTON WAY 6381 TETON LN 6380 TETON LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7528 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7527 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7507 CHRISTOPHER WALTER MAY CINDY JO GREEN COLIN & LAURA J MCCULLOUGH 6400 TETON LN 6371 TETON LN 6470 BRETTON WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7527 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7528 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7507 DANIEL J & PAMELA J FELLER DANIEL J &SANDRA A COLICH DAVID W &JULIE A PEDERSON 6430 BRETTON WAY 1321 ASHTON CT 6511 DEVONSHIRE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7507 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7529 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7541 ELIZABETH RENEE HILLS GARY A & KAREN J DOHSE GARY P & LEORA F MATTILA O'COR 6251 TETON LN 1321 ITHILIEN 6431 BRETTON BRETTON WAY EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9054 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9032 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7508 GERALD E STORY GREGORY A TINBERG GREGORY F AAMODT 6281 TETON LN 6491 BRETTON WAY 6391 TETON LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8331 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7508 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7528 GREGORY S & PATRICIA J BAZANY JAMES A SHANESY JAMES J JOHNSON 6420 BRETTON WAY 6340 TETON LN 6421 BRETTON WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7507 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7527 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7508 JAMES R&CAROLYN K HESKETH JASON HARDIE JEFFREY R & PAULETTE L DANIEL 6500 DEVONSHIRE DR 1331 ASHTON CT 1321 STRATTON CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7537 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7529 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7509