A-1 Review Feasibility Study for West Water Treatment Plant0
A—I,
CITY OF
Development was approved in 2005 for a treatment plant and a small park. The
Fax: 952.227.1110
MEMORANDUM
CHANHASSEN
Harrison Road and Galpin Boulevard.
2310 Coulter Boulevard
TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager
7700 Market Boulevard
On July 28, 2014, the City Council reviewed options to treat the water from the
PO Box 147
FROM: Paul Oehme, Dir. of Public Works /City Engineer G
Chanhassen, MN 55317
refine options for treatment of the west well field.
Planning &
DATE: July 27, 2015 0
Administration
Phone: 952.227.1100
SUBJ: Review Draft Feasibility Study for West Water Treatment Plant
Fax: 952.227.1110
report for treatment of the western well field. The City contracted with SEH
Building Inspections
Consultants to complete a feasibility study.
Phone: 952.227.1180
BACKGROUND
Fax: 952.227.1190
DISCUSSION
Phone: 952.227.1300
The 2003, a water treatment plant study recommended treating the east well field
Engineering
wells first since these were the wells that have the highest iron and manganese
Phone: 952.227.1160
content. Water treatment for the west well field was planned to be phased in as
Fax: 952.227.1170
needed.
Finance
mandatory chlorine and fluoride as required from the State of Minnesota. About
Phone: 952.227.1140
The East Water Treatment Plant was constructed in 2005 and treats the iron and
Fax: 952.227.1110
manganese in the low zone area.
Park & Recreation
The City purchased a piece of property at the time the Lake Harrison
Phone: 952.227.1120
Development was approved in 2005 for a treatment plant and a small park. The
Fax: 952.227.1110
location is at the south end of Manchester Road at the intersection of Lake
Recreation Center
Harrison Road and Galpin Boulevard.
2310 Coulter Boulevard
Phone: 952.227.1400
On July 28, 2014, the City Council reviewed options to treat the water from the
Fax: 952.227.1404
western wells for iron and manganese. At that meeting staff was directed to
refine options for treatment of the west well field.
Planning &
Natural Resources
Phone: 952.227.1130
In March 2014, staff received proposals from consultants for drafting a feasibility
Fax: 952.227.1110
report for treatment of the western well field. The City contracted with SEH
Consultants to complete a feasibility study.
Public Works
7901 Park Place
DISCUSSION
Phone: 952.227.1300
Fax: 952.227.1310
The City's East Water Treatment Plant removes iron and manganese from the east
Senior Center
field by a gravity filtration process. The wells in the west side of the city are not
Phone: 952.227.1125
filtered for iron and manganese. All of the City's water is treated with the
Fax: 952.227.1110
mandatory chlorine and fluoride as required from the State of Minnesota. About
33% of the City's water supply remains unfiltered prior to delivery to the water
Website
distribution system. This percentage is expected to grow as the City develops.
www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us
The City has drafted a feasibility study to look at removing iron and manganese
from the western wells. Also included was a pilot plant study to look at what
Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow
Todd Gerhardt
July 27, 2015
Review Draft Feasibility Study for
West Water Treatment Plans
Page 2
filtration process is the most cost effective approach to removal of iron and manganese. The
pilot study findings were also used for cost estimating of a filtration plant.
Primary Drinking Water Standards
Primary Standards are legally enforceable standards that public water suppliers are required to
meet. Primary standards protect public health by regulating the levels of certain contaminants in
public water supplies. Primary drinking water standards include regulations for levels of-
microorganisms, disinfectants, disinfectant byproducts, inorganic chemicals, organic chemicals
and radionuclides. The City of Chanhassen's drinking water does not exceed any primary
drinking water standards.
Secondary Drinking Water Standards
Secondary Standards are non - enforceable guidelines which regulate contaminants such as iron,
manganese, and hardness that cause aesthetic or cosmetic effects, such as taste, odor and color,
and can cause problems with piping.
Manganese
The secondary standard for manganese is 0.05 milligrams per liter (mg/L; equivalent to parts per
million [ppm]). Water with concentrations of manganese above the secondary standard can
cause black or brown staining on fixtures and taste complaints. The drinking water from
Chanhassen's unfiltered wells consistently exceeds the Secondary Standard for manganese with
concentrations ranging from 0.33 mg/L to 0.46 mg/L.
Iron
The secondary standard for iron is 0.3 mg/L. Water with concentrations of iron above the
secondary standard causes reddish -brown staining on fixtures. The drinking water from the west
Well Nos. 3 and 9 exceed the secondary standard for iron with concentrations of 0.5 mg/L and
0.93 mg/L, respectively.
Hardness
Although not included as a secondary standard, water above 120 mg/L hardness is considered
hard water. Hard water causes scaling on fixtures and can eventually cause piping to become
plugged. The drinking water from Chanhassen's wells is considered hard with a hardness
ranging from 260 mg/L to 320 mg/L.
The City has chosen not to treat for hardness because well water does not require the water to be
softened and softening water is much more expensive capital cost and operational and
maintenance then filtering for iron and manganese. The level to which water is softened is also a
personal preference and everyone has a different point where they think water should be
softened. In communities that have softening plants, many residents choose to still soften their
water. For these reasons, the City has chosen not to soften the water at a City level.
Water Quality Concerns Associated with Iron and Manganese
Chanhassen has some unique water quality issues caused by the high zone's untreated water and
the way it directly influences portions of the city's treated low zone areas. The area, referred to
as the "Minnewashta Loop ", comprises Chanhassen's western border and runs from Highway 5
g: \eng \public \_2015 projects \15 -3 west water treatment plant feasiblity study \072715 bkgd ws west wtp review feasiblity report2.doc
Todd Gerhardt
July 27, 2015
Review Draft Feasibility Study for
West Water Treatment Plans
Page 3
north up Minnewashta Parkway to Highway 7 then east to Highway 41. This area is a large
hydraulic loop linked to the low zone's treated water on the southern end and the high zone's
untreated water on the northern side at Highway 7 and Highway 41. During periods of normal to
low use, this area is served with treated water, however, in periods of high use the demand is
heavily supplemented from the unfiltered western wells. This condition causes troublesome
rusty water complaints throughout the Minnewashta Loop area. The only remedy for these
complaints is to perform localized hydrant flushing to remove the discoloration. Unfortunately,
this activity only introduces more untreated high zone influence on the low zone and also has a
dramatic effect on chlorine residuals. Chlorine is added to the water to guard against disease
causing pathogens. The City's untreated water has a high chlorine demand because it is rich
with iron and manganese. These elements chemically oxidize together with chlorine in
distribution piping, bringing them out of solution and creating discolored material. This
condition makes for an uneven chlorine residual throughout the city; higher in the east and lower
to the west.
Well Nos. 3 and 9 located on Galpin Boulevard north of Highway 5 are low zone wells directly
connected to the distribution system and are not treated by the East Water Treatment Plant.
These supportive wells offer water production in periods of high city demand; however, they
also bear negative water quality issues upon the low zone. The areas most affected with
discolored water from these wells are along W. 78th Street and include Arboretum Village
Townhomes, the Vasserman Trail area, and the Walnut Grove HOA.
Treated areas of the city not under any direct or indirect influence from the high zone experience
very little or no discolored water throughout the year.
M1�
-r }Icy {' :�
y.tiv.la`
r � w.lis 5R ,
�; + � - � -� ^•�( •� � � C" L `f"a a ''r IAbll 12
I _ _ vkw ]
► I I �... S7�
Y1YII 10- �YIMII�13`I
High F,,,
Low a
® Treated/Untreated Zone
`A
July 23, 20 14
g: \eng \public \_2015 projects \15 -3 west water treatment plant feasiblity study \072715 bkgd ws west wtp review feasiblity report2.doc
Todd Gerhardt
July 27, 2015
Review Draft Feasibility Study for
West Water Treatment Plans
Page 4
Treatment Filter Plant Considerations
The Comprehensive Plan and the Capital Improvement Plan both have a treatment plant
proposed for the City -owned property at the northwest corner of Galpin Boulevard and Lake
Harrison Drive. This property is zoned Residential - Single Family. City Code Section 20- 612(7)
states that utility services are a permitted use so no zoning change is necessary if a treatment
plant is to be constructed on this property.
The feasibility study completed, soil borings, a site evaluation, treatment plant layout and a
rendering of a concept plant. Soil borings were taken to identify any poor soils that would need
to be removed and for structural consideration of the building. The water table was also
measured to set the underground storage tanks. Since this is a residential area, the concept
should blend into the area. For this reason the project should have an extensive landscape plan.
Also a neighborhood park is planned to be constructed on the north side of the plant site after the
facility is constructed. The site plan for the water plant should discourage the area around the
plant for pedestrians. The plant is very similar to the form and function at the East Water
Treatment Plant. The size of the plant is also the same the East Plant.
g: \eng \public \_2015 projects\15 -3 west water treatment plant feasiblity study \072715 bkgd ws west wtp review feasiblity report2.doc
Todd Gerhardt
July 27, 2015
Review Draft Feasibility Study for
West Water Treatment Plans
Page 5
CAPITAL COST OPINION
Based on current construction costs and plant size, below is the Capital Cost Estimate for the
plant.
Construction Cost $15,630,000
Contingency (10 %) $ 1,563,000
Construction Total $17,193,000
Engineering/and other indirect costs (13 %) $ 2,235,000
Total Cost $19,428,000
The cost also including extending raw water main from the existing wells to the treatment plant
and modifications to the existing wells.
Staff discussed a phased -in approach with the City Council where several smaller plants would
be constructed over time to avoid a one -time large capital expenditure. This approach was
dismissed because the City would still have iron and manganese problems until the last plant is
constructed and the cost to construct up to three plants versus one large plant would be more.
Furthermore, the life cycle cost and labor to run several plants would be more than one large
plant. If a water treatment plant were to be built, a full -time plant operator will also need to be
hired.
Staff is planning to give a detailed review of the findings of the feasibly report at the Council
Work Session.
Attached: Rendering
Layout
Raw Water Main Figure
g: \eng \public \_2015 projects \15 -3 west water treatment plant feasiblity study \072715 bkgd ws west wtp review feasiblity report2.doc
�� 3D CONCEPTUAL CUT - DO NOT MOVE
�q
�L
F
N
I It 1
PUM e. .lo 1 MRM 1
K&ivmm D 1
WETLAND -D 1 left
w low we 10
�
on
WE %LANL — — — _ _ _ /// oN TUAL SITE LAYOUT
E
E
cS
0
w
U
U
g
a
0
I L-I-Z
LNend
750,000 Gal
Proposed Raw Water Main
MM W Tower
— " Alternate Raw Water Main
Well 15
3.5 MG Lake Lucy
Existing Raw Water Main
Reservoir
Existing Well
^•
8 Existing Elevated Storage
Existing WTP
Alternate Raw
Watermain
Existing Waterlines
Alignment
-
10" Raw
Parks
®
Watermain
Lakes
Well 7
mN
r
Proposed
Well B
WTP Site
Lake
Lake
Lucy
Harrison
16" Raw
Watermain
a
Existing Raw
Watermain Well 3
Existing Raw
Watermain�
L a k e A no
0 500 1.000
2,000
Feet
Well 9
«...� «.., �.a...
J/
Project: CHANH I32283
Proposed Raw��
�WS• .E Op
Date: 07/20/2015
Feasibility Study
Watermain and
Figure
sxo.n�zn
Chanhassen, Minnesota
west water
M.o W:.m
—".
SEH
�.�. �Ky—m •«
SEHM,M.DNH
Treatment Plant
1