The URL can be used to link to this page

13. WAP Appendix F Avienda Wetland Permit Application APPENDIX F MnRAM Analysis Output Results - ------- --- --- » < < c < < # < < $ A. / a CI / a CT / a a a DFri if if II \ 7 I ) I- r- ■ q §. G 2 0 2 _ A 2 \ , . ft / 2 r co2 # % / - § § § § § \ lz 9) $ 9) § a) § $ 9) % § S § ) § § ) § o S § § S � S 2 co" \ \ § \ \ \ § k - - - - 2 -u - -0 -0 - -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 - \ p 2 K E K K 2 2 K 0 m m m m I k co o 2 0. > _ ' > k > > > § - - - - 0 ` 2 -0-CD ® < 2 V2 2 '<0D ® 2 ® '< < - / / V % - 0 0 / / / / D I A p ° - - - - 2 41 a3 ƒ 0$ § ƒ ƒ $ a 2 k 24. f% ? = e s £ = & ( k § CO _ _ ■ /_ }/ \ _/ /_ \ Fii�_ • ƒ ƒ_ .: /_ q Q 4' k \ ; » k k \ \ k k CD m t [ CD 0 CD m m CD * { § 2 { an) { { 2 2 E • Co 5 7 2 k q . b 2 et 0 0 0 0 ® 0 0 © © 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o• k 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 § § / ) o k � ■ $ $ g g P , g g o 0 0 0 2 g - g ■ ■ -. « � m a a a 6 ■ 4 ƒ � q 1 - - - K M c c a o r I- r Et Zi. a a K ! ! ■ a , E E E ® � # 2 C 2 2 I- 2 / / E 5 a \ c‘mo E o 7 3 [ 0 E 2 2 * 2 * / § C g ® \7 \ u r--1 rn II I-1 I—I 1-1 1 * t k 7 0 .ZZ m 0 b ft r r / 0 Cr% et $ et 2 7 ft \ ` o. % o. o e - - , o. k § 2 § S o ) A e m \ � \ § h. £ / % m 2 2 2 4 acoaco $ ( » p O ■ ( u o ■4. 2, % m m § § 2 7 - % - - ' / / o \ } } 5 5 \ 2 It: C4 .... b \ 3 b o \ 0 \ \ A t' ƒ 7 n 4 10 A % cp � � t_.,'• ■ . 2 A. ■ k I � / \ q a $$ { { { §• i g ® tet I- rQ $ / * { 2 §' Q k ® 0.\ ■ — — z J I- r / a / / k k NIK u E i—i ll lI .. '17 > 2 > > > > > >> > Z. m' m m m m m5. CD m' m CD f p a a a a a o. a a a a i m m m m m m m d m m co 01 ,Ii O V O) A Ca C n O o m i * A c b kV CZt W W Ca C W C W C.) CO C.) ti COD a COD CD CO CD CO CO CD f0 CO CO CO 9 9 0 9 O O 9 9 9 9 n :a .. ._. .... A N 0) O) O) 0) Q) 0) 0) 0) O N N N W WOW WW AD W W F N N N N CO CaN CaN W W W W W W w W w o 0 b O o a O o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m O m 0 m 0 00 m 0 O m O m 0 O O m 0 '.Z' 7 m 7 m 7 m m m 7 m m 7 m 7 m m m 7 m a (7, (D v m V v V (D v V m y gm mm gm 3.3 B.mj-m 3 3 j(m(i� 3 3.6'y g.3 3 37 3N C fO y Ny ,OFD' N N N 4N1 fO N N N V(/1 N O ft...., O 4 O 4'O O O 4.O 5 4'O '^O O O 4'O o n on on nn on 7 on an o 7 on O 3 ,2 30 3 .111 ow 3S1 d 322 3 m RR 302 c c c a Wit- c a w O V c c 1T c i -07. -OD. '0 co '0 7. 'O 7. O 55 VD. b G C 4'C 5'C C C C p Q. ii 6 g 3`z 3'Z 3`z o 3 3`z a 3', 3'Z o 0 3'� fiCCCCC -- CCO CCC7CC 0"C 0' 0C S0aO"C QC' S QC f ;D f0 fm mm f0 E m E m d m f m IIS.� a• C m a C C d N a C 3 m FA Ctt7 m C m m cr a C . D-0 g O m 0 7 7 m O 0- m O m O SS m O O am am am 5> "m 5 am am >> am 3 3 3 m m 3 m 3 3 :CLUE 'm Clmwf 7 7 m m 7 N 7 7 C) C) 2 � �1 ci ci ci a s ci a ci m RB. d t).4 7 7 .. 22 7 C 7 7 C C 7 a, m a2C m m m m ((((,�,�� O 2 2 1r)- _^ 2 N 2 2 _ 2 tit 7 O. a a a a a a rt m m m v 8 m m COI▪ COO CO m CO0 CO CD CD CD m m CD CD c0 Con I- r r r a• x r 2. r a m f f f 0 , E, 0 m m o°o `, m m m w 'm ,13 o CD Z 40 $ E = r I a c o g o m m m m m A 3 3 w 3 m8 m d d = p A m CD CD CD CD m m m m a b o O 0 p3p p8.p a _ 8. _ a _ g r7 a N N N N a t0 m tp m CO A A )n N 3 3 6) N N g d - • 1 p N N N m m N m CD I- r r- r a• 2 r 8. r o y p Z. s' • 0 f f y s f m E .4 i 4 m m b o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o bs�„ 6. 0 ft $ v v v $ v▪ v v v _ n C CD m m m 8 8 2 2 m 8 2 % g. tl U 0' Q O' O' 0- Q Q Q Q' b y CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD > > > f > > > > > >\ ID i s A.• . 0. [ } 0. } (k k 7 § E 0 / / } . )} G 0 ac, -1 , Fir. / 2 90) } Itt co / co / 14.4 ) § 9 ; \ ( \ \ \ \ \ ( / \ K { r 0 M ) 2 2 ¥ 2 E 2 20 E a E Q E. FIT m ��\ � ( ` ` w >2 >2 >2 >Z >Z >Z >Z >Z >Z >Z $ ? E _ _ _ , P. /� \� \� \� /� / / / / ® \/ CD CD . , m , , a ftli F I- r r T. # � ( Q � x _; 2 2 2 > > a 2 Ei t § P . 44: « 0 k / 0 ° ill 2 2 2 0 E E 2 a 2 aKCD . § 7 a CD CD CD ` ZS63 131 O m m a m " % \ ; \ \ t et 2 ƒ 0 ƒ ƒ F ■ A % > > > > > > > > ■ % / / / / ii E E E E E E E E \ 2 m m won m xen x m92 m ƒ £ 'Z .c,') Lin CD CD /(i CD (}( ( %($ CD § » \ i ( A 1 � m W. m m , I 5 . ; - o ; A @t / a a z ( 9, ( z z ( ( l' ® CD CD > > / » > > > » ( ( \ _ _ _ 2 } ! & \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ } r r 44. / (\ 2 2 2 2 E / a 2 2 $ § § ° .13 ° l (\ M CP i % f ` / o m o m K K K K ; ; e 8 a ECD o 2 a a a � | A. - - ■ re CPI § E m m , g m , e #PI / § ; / \ 7 f $ 7 2 rt o ¥ , , % 7 C \ r C \ r / 2 § $ / ƒ { ` Co 2 ~ 2 N ts 3. e) A ro }{ / ; �� 7 ¥ ; ~ / § / o R [ % 22 \ A o % C � ` * F.a( k / 1 r rt E E % 77 • § > g ° \ 8 @ / � n 2 E k & / P. � ` � - - � A } n § § k 2 \ {k ( k \ 0 ± 6 P. o _ _ (13 0 n''4.:,:, -I --I 0 - $ ) % 2 ■ _ ( -, @ = ; 2 E = `0 IQ� . ' Cr 0 r Co(1) C { *§ ~ 11) m 2 CZ $ a ■ - m { q % { . o { cr E m �f ƒ q ` 0 (C) % \ \ / » X1 . n G § ft 2 $ k 6 » ° ° � 0 ` D o 1 E . ° % ƒ ] ° � � 2 — — . � � 5 n � ; \ _ * \ � @ SAA %• -gP elm , 2 p ? Jg q \ ° / { � CD * $ ft } 4. ■ I P E a E o / 7 2 % in in » } o / a / 0A \ k K , / § a.a. 1 r ° ? \ { a01 '0.. 12 k \ \ Ek , Cr a ( R \ 2t. ■, C 0 o r o a $ � cl z 2 § ƒ k 2 ; § 2 / > a \ ƒ g & \\ ■ 2 R ; � _ 0 � 8 � § { { � k $ cr e 70 2k ft •••• k@ ( g r P r ` » 0 » 0 » C / / ® nty MnRAM: Site Response Record For Wetland: Avienda WL1 Location: 10-116-23-23-001 • Avienda Plant Community: Fresh(Wet)Meadow57 Commercial crop--hydro impact NA Adjacent area slope Cowardin Classification: Circular 39: 26-A Gentle 0% PEMAd Type 1 Groundwater-specific questions 26-B Moderate 100% Plant Community: Shallow Marsh 58 Wetland soils Recharge Steep P Subwatershed land use Cowardin Classification: Circular 39: 59Recharge PEMCd Type 3 60 Wetland size/soil group Recharge 4 Listed,rare,special species? No 27 Downstream sens./WQ protect. B 61 Wetland hydroperiod Recharge 62 Inlet/Outlet configuration Discharge 5 Rare community or habitat? No 28 Nutrient loading B 63 Upland topo relief Recharge 6 Pre-European-settlement condition? No Hydrogeomorphology/topography: 29 Shoreline wetland? No Additional information 7 Depressional/FlowThru Shoreline Wetland 64 Restoration potential No 30 Rooted veg.,%cover 0% 65 LO affected by restoration 8_1 Maximum water depth 6 inches %inundated 50% 31 Wetland in-water width 0 feet 8-2 G6 Existing size 1.03 Immediate drainage--local WS 40 acres 32 Emerg.veg.erosion resistance 0 9Restorable size 33 Erosion potential of site 10 Esimated size/existing site: (see#66) Potential new wetland 0 34 Upslope veg./bank protection 11-Upland Soil 35 Rare wildlife? No 67 Average width of pot.buffer 0 feet 11-Wetland Soil 36 Scare/Rare/S1/S2 community No 68 Ease of potential restoration 37 Vegetative cover NA 69 Hydrologic alterations 0 38 Veg.community interspersion c 70 Potential wetland type 0 39 Wetland detritus B 71 Stor•mwater sensitivity B 12 Outlet forflood control B 40 Interspersion on landscape B 72 Additional treatment needs C 13 Outlet for hydro regime C 41 Wildlife barriers B Watershed Minnesota(Shakopee) 14 Dominant upland land use C WS# 33 Service Area: 9 15 Wetland soil condition A Amphibian-breeding potential For functional ratings, please run the 16 Vegetation(%cover) 100% 42 Hydroperiod adequacy Adequate Summary tab report. 17 Emerg.veg flood resistance B 43 Fish presence A This report printed on: 12/9/2016 18 Sediment delivery B 44 Overwintering habitat C 19 Upland soils(soil group) B 45 Wildlife species(list) 20 Stormwater runoff A 46 Fish habitat quality NA 21 Subwatershed wetland density B 47 Fish species(list) 22 Channels/sheet flow C _ 48 Unique/rare opportunity No 23 Adjacent buffer width 20 feet 49 Wetland visibility C Adjacent area management 50 Proximity to population No 24-A Full 100% S) Public ownership C 24-B Manicured 0% S2 Public access C 24-C Bare 0% S3 Human influence on wetland B Adjacent area diversity/structure 54 Human influence on viewshed C 25-A Native 0% 55 Spatial buffer A 25-B Mixed 100% 56 Recreational activity potential C 25-C Sparse 0% / cof T. f r 0 $ 0. § / » / CD \ tv \ \ % n L1%1 o 2 WO` 2 § ƒ 52A nE © @o m O o I- o \ % ( $ [k \ % § / o m / E �§ ([ § \ - - c - � * -E. § m § 2 & \ et § % z te) � ( ID \ 7 S f ® k 2 � 2 � RM [ ° � R. g 2 E. i * ' 0 — ~ ` � A n 4i7 2 13 13 13 « 2 0 �] ; A mal EI � A. n ci > E Q ƒ ƒ 2 0 } \ 5o. ' q A ® anD 2 Q " ' 2 2 2 $ ; * _ ® cn i o o § ; m S. ƒ 0$ „ � § 2 m \ ( % ƒ / Cl) ] § \ § � � � f / / co k\ k 3 k k �m 9 z o ma. 0. ƒ { o 2 , / ° E E Q �f . 2 o //� / * n 4.2 3 % 0(� ( , i ro o 0 00 - R � § ( ( o \ ® \ � � � } 01 - ( / RI ; ° U 5 O) 4 g o g E Z. z ) 7 .i. it . , ■ 7 7 # ■ 2 t } ( � i o ■ . ( % 0 , J .1 ( ° 40.. ■ E 2 E o E 2 / o k o k o K o c / ¥ § \ I o ? \ \ � � £ � O. 4K 2 ® . © ■ � ! ® � ` ° \ � § ) 0 ` t ` 4 � ; lt ` ( ii 0 r@ g r P tl 3 4 � / § z o E o ] o ! o « o « 6 \ / t -g 0 � f # gym ■ • rt 4 % o ¥ / $ k D. ( [ 0 2 k E | iii o ± o ± o .0 o 3 / 7 l � § 7 0 7 0 5 § ' 10 0 0- k k i ® k m m _ MnRAM: Site Response Record For Wetland: Avienda WL2 Location: 10-116-23-23-001 Avienda Plant Community: Shallow,Open Water C 25-A Native 0% 55 Spatial buffer A Cowardin Classification: Circular 39: 25-B Mixed 0% S6 Recreational activity potential C PUBG Type 5 ° 25-C .Sparse 100% Plant Community: Fresh(Wet)Meadow S7 Commercial crop--hydro impact NA Cowardin Classification: Circular 39: Adjacent area slope PEMBd Type 2 26-A Gentle 0% Groundwater-specific questions Plant Community: Fresh(Wet)Meadow 26-B Moderate 100% S8 Wetland soils Recharge Cowardin Classification: Circular 39: 26-C Steep 0% 59 Subwatershed land use Recharge PEMAd Type 1 60 Wetland size/soil group Recharge 4 Listed,rare,special species? No 61 Wetland hydroper•iod Discharge 27 Downstream sens./WQ protect. B 62 Inlet/Outlet configuration Discharge 5 Rare community or habitat? No 28 Nutrient loading B 63 Upland topo relief Recharge 6 Pre-European-settlement condition? No Hydrogeomorphology/topography: 29 Shoreline wetland? No Additional information 7 Depressional/Tributary G4 Restoration potential No Shoreline Wetland 65 LO affected by restoration 8_] Maximum water depth 60 inche 30 Rooted veg., %cover• 0% 8_2 %inundated 60% 31 Wetland in-water width 0 feet 66 Existing size 2.33 9 Immediate drainage--local WS 40 acres 32 Emerg.veg.erosion resistanceRestorable size 0 10 Esimated size/existing site: (see#66) 33 Erosion potential of site Potential new wetland 0 34 Upslope veg./bank protection 11-Upland Soil No 67 Average width of pot.buffer 0 feet 35 Rare wildlife? Ease of potential restoration11-Welland Soil 36 Scare/Rare/S1/S2 community No 68 69 Hydrologic alterations 0 37 Vegetative cover B 70 Potential wetland type 0 38 Veg.community interspersion C 71 Stor•mwater sensitivity B 39 Wetland detritus B 72 Additional treatment needs C 12 Outlet for flood control C 40 Interspersion on landscape B 13 Outlet for hydro regime B 41 wildlife ban•iers B Watershed Minnesota(Shakopee) 14 Dominant upland land use C WS# 33 Service Area: 9 15 Wetland soil condition C Amphibian-breeding potential For functional ratings, please run the 16 Vegetation(%cover) 80% 42 Hydroperiod adequacy Adequate Summary tab report. 17 Emerg.veg flood resistance NA43 Fish presence A This report printed on: 12/9/2016 18 Sediment delireiy B 44 Overwintering habitat B 19 Upland soils(soil group) B 45 Wildlife species(list) 20 Storm water runoff A 21 Subwatershed wetland density B 46 Fish habitat quality NA 47 Fish species(list) 22 Channels/sheet flow A 48 Unique/rare opportunity No 23 Adjacent buffer width 0 feet 49 Wetland visibiliy C Adjacent area management 50 Proximity to population No 24-A Full 0% 51 Public ownership C 24-B Manicured 0% 52 Public access C 24-C Bare 100% 53 Human influence on wetland B Adjacent area diversity/structure S4 Human influence on viewshed C n p I D / 7 •_ E 7 0. J $ Q. § / } \ ¥ 2 t k ) k ± , 7 \ Q § % m 3 S.rt ` 2 ' et ro f 2nA e Z �� E ■• 2 . ¥ %. ° ft E E / \ f ( A �) ¥ 2 § ill� ° / & - ! ( § o \*/ � � kk cm 0. 4 c 4 CO iii k z ) r ( \ % e f P - . ` o ¥ & | � ; g ft { ° E [ / ( � ` � COI\ trk QIt = QQ. 02 en p - z r- 2 %/ k ( 5,7 0 I> k \ � � ( \ k to 2 o. m ` 4 co ¥ 0co TS $ ( n n \ tomn. 0 } o � \ � o. � o' n' to 3 ■ § § . K � t 56. - ~ co k 4- z ■ \ o R ! = 8 ( CT I K �f N. m , E P §• ; , # O i13 tn, 2 ƒmak — / xi - n Gel 3 b g ( J2 � 0 k `ia ¥ @ { 2 ■ � ok ] } t ■ 2 [ � ` 5 — �� '-4 ''Z' z |. f ms s Z. q © @ (B lo � A § k § i { P (B ( 4 � ° � ( - co co / 4 .4 °00 a. | P E P 7 \ o k / / t ; \ o 0 ? 7\ \ � � [ o ( � `I � K 2 ., t3 � ; » Ca \ n § ■ ( ` ° ` 2 a. ; Oz » k � , \ % P o @ 7 » § � -0 § o ! o / o nc. t k , ■ lir., ` % o � ( � { 1 0 $ K ; $ E 9rg • / 3 B 1 \ CrP 0 0 0 / ® rte MnRAM: Site Response Record For Wetland: Avienda WL3 Location: 10-116-23-23-001 Avienda Plant Community: Fresh(Wet)Meadow Adjacent area slope Cowardin Classification: Circular 39: 26-A Gentle 100% Groundwater-specific questions PEMA Type 1 26-B Moderate 0% S8 Wetland soils Recharge 26-C Steep 0% 59 Subwatershed land use Recharge 4 Listed,rare,special species? No 60 Wetland size/soil group Recharge 5 61 Wetland hydroperiod Recharge Rare community or habitat? No 27 Downstream sens./WQ protect. A 62 Inlet/Outlet configuration Recharge 6 Pre-European-settlement condition? No 63 Upland topo relief Recharge 28 Nutrient loading B Hydrogeomorphology/topography: 7 Depressional/Tributary Additional information 29 Shoreline wetland? No 64 Restoration potential No 8_j Maximum water depth 8 inches Shoreline Wetland 65 LO affected by restoration 8_2 %inundated 5% 30 Rooted veg.,%cover 0% 9 Immediate drainage--local WS 20 acres 31 Wetland in-water width 0 feet 66 Existing size 0.58 10 Esimated size/existing site: (see#66) 32 Emerg.veg.erosion resistance Restorable size 0 33 Erosion potential of site Potential new wetland 0 11-Upland Soil 34 Upslope veg./bank protection 67 Average width of pot.buffer 0 feet 11-Wetland Soil 35 Rare wildlife? No 68 Ease of potential restoration 36 Scare/Rare/S1/S2 community No 69 Hydrologic alterations 0 37 Vegetative cover NA 70 Potential wetland type 0 38 Veg.community interspersion NA 71 Stormwater sensitivity B 12 Outlet for flood control B 39 Wetland detritus B 72 Additional treatment needs C j 3 Outlet for hydro regime A 40 Interspersion on landscape B 14 Dominant upland land use C - B Watershed Minnesota(Shakopee) 15 Wetland soil condition A 41 Wildlife barriers WS# 33 Service Area: 9 16 Vegetation(%cover) 100% Amphibian-breeding potential For functional ratings, please run the 17 Emerg.vegflood resistance B Summarytab report. 42 Hydroperiod adequacy Adequate 18 Sediment delivery A This report printed on: 12/13/2016 43 Fish presence A 19 Upland soils(soil group) B 44 Overwintering habitat 20 Stormwater runoff A 45 Wildlife species(list) 21 Subwatershed wetland density B 22 Channels/sheet flow A 46 Fish habitat quality NA 47 Fish species(list) 23 Adjacent buffer width 0 feet 48 Unique/rare opportunity No Adjacent area management - 49 Wetland visibility B 24-A Full 0% 24-B Manicured 0% 50 Proximity to population Yes 24-C Bare 100% 51 Public ownership C 52 Public access B Adjacent area diversity/structure 53 Human influence on wetland B 25-A Native 0% 54 Human influence on viewshed C 25-B Mixed 0% 55 Spatial buffer B 25-C Sparse 100% 56 Recreational activity potential C S7 Commercial crop--hydro impact NA D �I D < T a El 5. �" N 7 "` til. O. • til. o ti� p b 0. S N Z C n ti . �' * p ? O 3 ti A C A A to N ''t Pp O 'r r' rtsr) o °' n K Sao o' 5.o x O W W n m N c A fi 9 N l' '' % °° y o �. n a m oQ tir A 0 n C N R ? .�'•. R o 7 R rr�� o 4, 'l 1 rin a w 1 e fez w z n , •o C� A c'DO ( 0 co Q yE74. o S. co !V 'O o �+ n• Z r, Ts �' O p. ti 3 'O t. R W e..4.e..4.m ° n' P. m n �, S A o. sn ° ' m `' a o n o a 2 °cy fW w z. Sn C FO `S O ''')i-'. V Y O • n' o CDv m N CI) N �, n N CD '0S � .Rba T A n r e h o T N f w $ : R 5 m O a fi ° c c M 3- SN o Z coa. o O vO ~ O R 2 W .7 �0� Q e RIp R C. ]' y W A, .1 ^ y Q W '� o• C R D0 rl co m s e d 4 A 4 y O 0 y O C• to p' ti C 1 0 wl' W o g 3 O .1' a, 4. W .@ p O C. OZ \ ►b C z P C �• fp oDD o y b * ? 1 4. 0 3 1 a 0 ro a - Q �' p ... .2 = W bC A A y N W a o r o p f a yy _a 0 ti ~ y r o s fD j 2 a rir ca•z. a a' R -13 o r o a R s 0) o f 0 ' A A D c o _ oq �C v o e R e v_ 8 .n O o O c c g•• s. a R R W R It C N. .� 0 y R p R o I- o o ; , ^ i o f o p dQ A MnRAM: Site Response Record For Wetland:Avienda WL4 Location: 10-116-23-23-001 Avienda Plant Community: Fresh(Wet)Meadow Adjacent area slope Cowardin Classification: Circular 39: 26-A Gentle 0% Groundwater-specific questions PEMAd Type 1 26-B Moderate 100% S8 Wetland soils Recharge 26-C Steep 0% 59 Subwatershed land use Recharge 4 Listed,rare,special species? No 60 Wetland size/soil group Recharge 5 Rare community or habitat? No 61 Wetland hydroperiod Recharge 27 Downstream sens./WQ protect. B 62 Inlet/Outlet configuration Recharge 6 Pre-European-settlement condition? No 63 Upland topo relief Recharge 28 Nutrient loading B Hydrogeomorphology/topography: 7 Depressional/FlowThru Additional information 29 Shoreline wetland? No G4 Restoration potential No 8_1 Maximum water depth 6 inches Shoreline Wetland 65 LO affected by restoration 8-2 %inundated 50% 30 Rooted veg.,%cover 0% 9 Immediate drainage--local WS 40 acres 31 Wetland in-water width 0 feet 66 Existing size 0.13 10 Esimated size/existing site: (see#66) 32 Emerg.veg.erosion resistance Restorable size 0 33 Erosion potential of site Potential new wetland 0 11-Upland Soil 34 Upslope veg./bankprotection 11-Wetland Soil 67 Average width of pot.buffer 0 feet 35 Rare wildlife? No 68 Ease of potential restoration 36 Scare/Rare/S1/S2 community No 69 Hydrologic alterations 0 37 Vegetative cover NA 70 Potential wetland type 0 38 Veg.community interspersion NA 7] Stormwater sensitivity B 12 Outlet for flood control C 39 Wetland detritus B 72 Additional treatment needs C 13 Outlet for hydro regime C Dominant upland land use C 40 Interspersion on landscape B 14 P A Watershed Minnesota(Shakopee) /5 Wetland soil condition A 41 Wildlife barriers WS# 33 Service Area: 9 16 Vegetation(%cover) 100% Amphibian-breeding potential For functional ratings, please run the 17 Emerg.veg flood resistance B Summarytab report. 42 Hydroperiod adequacy Adequate p 18 Sediment delivery B This report printed on: 12/9/2016 43 Fish presence A 19 Upland soils(soil group) B 44 Overwintering habitat 20 Stormwater runoff A 21 Subwatershed wetland density B 45 lVildlife species(list) 22 Channels/sheet flow c 46 Fish habitat quality NA 47 Fish species(list) 23 Adjacent buffer width 50 feet 48 Unique/rare opportunity No Adjacent area management 49 Wetland visibility C 24-A Full 100%1 24-B Manicured 0% 50 Proximity to population No 24-C Bare 0% 5] Public ownership C S2 Public access C Adjacent area diversity/structure 53 Human influence on wetland B 25-A Native 0% 54 Human influence on viewshed B 25-B Mixed 100% 55 Spatial buffer A 25-C Sparse 0% 56 Recreational activity potential C 57 Commercial crop--hydro impact NA CDD / 7 f f [ 7 ft co (Ti \ E 2 cu o / \ / { ) , e m « / q m , 3 rt 111 / k k 0 n \ \ �( ¢ ( Eo A O & it e) [$ Lla 2 ft § / 2 Q 22 \] R0 m CM § P.' Z. /\ | 0. \ % PI § z ) § ( § % Q / P § \ E 0 Ig P. 2 E ` § , n ¥ 53 — 2 0n ( _ ? / ( §§ f \ / - CA kgt k % ° E ( / k Q a. $ • E ~ , - 0 ` w CD H D k $ b aka 91 r0 2 / § m 0 E ; ; � t E nt, ., ; � Em ) Inkk ~ � « t f 2 \ 3 i 8 a. 2 k 03a m © 0 \/, / ` , G 3 ti 9- 'i" $ Lz k k CZ ¢ R � E ( () ƒ ) CD 40 t ) 2 1-:1 LE' I ou � \ to. o A' 2 / q 0 77 0 # « . 2 q . § § 2E ° x CD SI1�. « ~ . E ( t m \ ; � 4, | P E P $ 7Eh o ! G o 7 / m f ; \ ( I 0 1 # ( ® a, � ■ � , .1 ; E . ■ oo ; /� k Er . ) § . ` 4" 4 ( | } c ; ■, a © 2 13 0 E ® 4 f r , . ..if '0 ¥ ( o ! % k ° P t � � # k a � ( a ¢ { P � § ) E 2 2 & % - | ; P r P 4 3 k / } ! 2 G ¢k / 0 , Icy MnRAM: Site Response Record For Wetland: Avienda WL5 Location: 10-116-23-23-001 Avienda Plant Community: Seasonally Flooded Ba Adjacent area slope Cowardin Classification: Circular 39: 26-A Gentle 0% Groundwater-specific questions PEMAd Type 1 26-B Moderate 100% S8 Wetland soils Recharge 26-C Steep 0% 59 Subwaier•shed land use Recharge 4 Listed,rare,special species? No 60 Wetland size/soil group Recharge 5 Rare community or habitat? No 61 Wetland hydroperiod Recharge 27 Downstream sens./WQ protect. B 62 Inlet/Outlet configuration Recharge 6 Pre-European-settlement condition? No 63 Upland topo relief Recharge 28 Nutrient loading C Hydrogeomorphology/topography: 7 Depressional/Tributary Additional information 29 Shoreline wetland? No G4 Restoration potential Yes 8-1 Maximum water depth 1 inches Shoreline Wetland 8_2 %inundated 100% °% ° 65 LO affected by restoration A 30 Rooted veg., cover 0 k 9 Immediate drainage--local WS 20 acres 3) Wetland in-water width 0 feet 66 Existing size 0.36 10 Esimated size/existing site: (see#66) 32 Emerg.veg.erosion resistance Restorable size 0 33 Erosion potential of site Potential new wetland 0 11-Upland Soil 34 Upslope veg./bank protection 11-Wetland Soil 67 Average width of pot.buffer 30 feet 35 Rare wildlife? No 68 Ease of potential restoration A 36 Scare/Rare/S1/S2 community No 69 Hydrologic alterations Drain 37 Vegetative cover NA Tiles, Lowere 38 Veg.community interspersion NA d Outlet 12 Outlet forflood control C 39 Wetland detritus C 70 Potential wetland type 1 13 Outlet for hydro regime C 40 Interspersion on landscape B 71 Stormwatersensitivity C 14 Dominant upland land use C 41 Wildlife barriers B 72 Additional treatment needs A I S Wetland soil condition C 16 Vegetation(%cover) 50% Watershed Minnesota(Shakopee) 17 Emerg.veg flood resistance C Amphibian-breeding potential WS# 33 Service Area: 9 42 Hydroperiod adequacy Inadequate 18 Sediment delivery B For functional ratings, please run the 43 Fish presence A g , 19 Upland soils(soil group) B Summary tab report. 44 Overwintering habitat This report printed on: 12/13/2016 Z0 Stormwater runoff A 45 Wildlife species(list) 21 Subwatershed wetland density B 22 Channels/sheet flow A 46 Fish habitat quality NA 47 Fish species(list) 23 Adjacent buffer width 0 feet 48 Unique/rare opportunity No Adjacent area management 49 Wetland visibility C 24-A Full 0% 24-B Manicured 0% 50 Proximity to population No 24-C Bare 100% 5) Public ownership C 52 Public access C Adjacent area diversity/structure 53 Human influence on wetland C 25-A Native 0% 54 Human influence on viewshed C 25-B Mixed 0% 55 Spatial buffer C 25-C Sparse 100% 56 Recreational activity potential C 57 Commercial crop--hydro impact C I m / $ f § 7 $ r \ 0 \ \ / 0 o » r / E 0 cm a) ® ° / , % § 0,11 } coO - $ et _ / 5Q / , »\ © 0. 2o # Z ` ro \ 5 ( E [) ¥ t t....1 ' 2R / � � ■ - ) cz Z. _\ R . � �' ; ; ( m ca ca 0 � Z. �4. � � �� i 7 t / 2 SU( \ % 6 z 2). ƒ Co / • � � 0 a $ & § ( ° � Ip 2 k e n ,c.t., G 13 ,A \ � / \ / 0 _ � . a a. g / 0 ° ( { § § o. t E '« - a D co § $ t hof, = [ 0 @ q2 § ƒ of § a., 0' z 11 E (( { » ■ � § ~ � « t / k § / o E P m = 8 [ f E m = k,/ ƒ q e :P k fil© met / } �. - � � 3 / � kJ / k 8 .a0 Z. E ' ' co 0 4. Se: _ 0 � CO m ( B2 , o k ° 2 \ : k \ 0 777 2 22 ® Z2 b 2k ( ? P a ƒ ocr { t J d \ kk | P E 2 / $ \ o ! oCfe f \ § \ ( Z E 9 ? \ ( 0. - [ x , 21 e co so4a , 2 $ 7 ; tom ° Jn ( ( ] o ■U. E k § � k � \ ( • © ; P r P a - ` ¥ k J k2 / °\ \ / f ® k � � � f � k a . / # � ( ( e E § ■ cr E g r g * 7 3 ) � ( \ 0 ■ m ! o C § A / 14. ` lk. MnRAM: Site Response Record For Wetland:Avienda WL6 Location: 10-116-23-23-001 Avienda Plant Community: Fresh(Wet)Meadow Adjacent area slope Cowardin Classification: Circular 39: 26-A Gentle 0% Groundwater-specific questions PEMAd Type 1 26-B Moderate 25% 58 Wetland soils Recharge 26-C Steep 75% 59 Subwatershed land use Recharge 4 Listed,rare,special species? No 60 Wetland size/soil group Recharge 5 Rare commnmit'or habitat? No 6] Wetland hvdroperiod Recharge 6 Pre-European-settlement condition. No 27 Downstream sens./WQ protect. A 62 Inlet/Outlet configuration Recharge 28 Nutrient loading C 63 Upland topo relief Recharge Hydrogeotnorphology/topography: 7 Depressional/Tributary Additional information 29 Shoreline wetland? No 64 Restoration potential No 8-1 Maximum water depth 0 inches Shoreline Wetland 8-2 %inundated 0% 65 LO affected by restoration 30 Rooted veg., %cover 0% 9 Immediate drainage--local iVS 20 acres 3] Wetland in-water width 0 feet 66 Existing size 0.78 10 Esimated size/existing site: (see#66) 32 Emerg.veg.erosion resistance Restorable size 0 11-Upland Soil 33 Erosion potential of site Potential new wetland 0 34 Upslope veg./bank protection 11-Wetland Soil G7 Average width of pot.bu fer 0 feet 35 Rare wildlife? No 68 Ease of potential restoration 36 Scare/Rare/S7/S2 community No 69 Hydrologic alterations 0 37 Vegetative cover NA 70 Potential wetland type 0 12 Outlet for flood control C 38 Veg.communityinterspersion NA 71 Stormwater•sensitivity B 13 Outlet for hydro regime C 39 Wetland detritus B 72 Additional treatment needs C 40 Interspersion on landscape B 14 Dominant upland land use B Watershed Minnesota(Shakopee) 1S 41 Wildlife barriers C Wetland soil condition AWS# 33 Service Area: 9 16 Vegetation(%cover) 100% 17 Emerg.veg flood resistance B Amphibian-breeding potential For functional ratings, please run the 42 Hydroperiod adequacy Inadequate Summary tab report. 18 Sediment delivery A This report printed on: 12/9/2016 43 Fish presence A 19 Upland soils(soil group) B 44 Overwintering habitat 20 Stonm,'ater rune A 45 Wildlife species(list) 21 S'ubwatershed wetland density C 22 Channels/sheet flow B 46 Fish habitat quality NA 47 Fish species(list) 23 Adjacent buffer width 50 feet 48 Unique/rare opportunity No Adjacent area management 49 Wetland risibilivisibilityB 24-A Full 100% 24-B Manicured 0% 50 Proximity to population Yes 24-C Bare 0% 51 Public ownership C S2 Public access C Adjacent area diversity/structure 53 Human influence on wetland B 25-A Native 0% 54 Human influence on viewshed C 25-B Mixed 100% 55 Spatial buffer B 25-C Sparse 0% 56 Recreational activity potential C 57 Commercial crop--hydro impact NA I D / 7 f 2 [ f ( z / 7 CL 2 CI Z. / CD iii r- » \ { \ / 2 .5o 2 ft2 \ I. QQ $ n " IE5' @o & e o \ % ( i 7k . 7 ¥ 2 N / % § -; A EI \ % ° ° ( k � / ; ƒ T k - n * \\ 2 Co It- j ( k et E ° z % ) $ 3 $ Co 0 P. -4 Ft' E\ § o [ ( ( m o C4 ( 0' & Sf § / n , ) | & \ r ? Z � 0 P \ \ ii 2 © ¥ 91 co a D o \ % / ht = 22 , m co - ƒ o � § ° � � g ''' 2 N. / k \ / i..1. z @ s \ [ ■ 5 ( C cr £ E �� \ r) 2G ° �( n o (ƒ 2 G $ b o tr f J % k 8 \ / D { � $ E ( ( ) 2' k 2 ■ g g � & % ■ E o l o § \ 2 ƒ 777 7 � �' k1 0. , ` 8 \ \ ( �m E \ Je s ^ . \ ¥ ■ E 4. | 2 E 7 2 a.Oz % o ! o00 z.„ ' ; \( 0. o ? \ ( � , a ; � � .. r0IZZ. , a k � ) § � | kg ` s 0 � � -13 m E © 2 ( Ce i & ! & / o » o ! s 0. et m 2 \ � o ® 7 ( ¢ K ! ) 2 m % E ! g ° o r 0 0 7 7 k ! cm 2 & prQ / ® mak MnRAM: Site Response Record For Wetland:Avienda WL7/8 Location: 10-116-23-23-001 Avienda Plant Community: Fresh(Wet)Meadow Adjacent area slope Cowardin Classification: Circular 39: 26-A Gentle 0% Groundwater-specific questions PEMAd Type 1 26-B Moderate 100% S8 Wetland soils Recharge 26-C Steep 0% 59 Subwatershed land use Recharge 4 Listed,rare,special species? No 60 Wetland size/soil group Recharge 5 Rare community or habitat? No 61 Wetland hydroperiod Recharge 27Downstream sens./WQ protect. B 6 Pre-European-settlement condition? No 62 Inlet/Outlet configuration Discharge 63 Upland topo relief Discharge 28 Nutrient loading B Hydrogeomorphology/topography: 7 DepressionailTributary Additional information 29 Shoreline wetland? No J 64 Restoration potential No 8-1 Maximum water depth 0 inches Shoreline Wetland 8-2 %inundated 0% 65 LO affected by restoration 30 Rooted veg.,%cover 0% 9 Immediate drainage--local WS 20 acres 31 Wetland in-water width 0 feet 66 Existing size 0.08 10 Esimated size/existing site: (see#66) 32 Emerg.veg.erosion resistance Restorable size 0 11-Upland Soil 33 Erosion potential of site Potential new wetland 0 34 Upslope veg./bank protection 11-Wetland Soil 67 Average width of pot buffer 0 feet 35 Rare wildlife? No 68 Ease of potential restoration 36 Scare/Rare/S1/S2 community No 69 Hydrologic alterations 0 37 Vegetative cover NA 70 Potential wetland type 0 38 Veg.community interspersion NA 71 Stormwater sensitivity B 12 Outlet for flood control C 13 Outlet for hydro regime C 39 Wetland detritus B 72 Additional treatment needs C Dominant upland land use C 40 Interspersion on landscape B 14 P C Watershed Minnesota(Shakopee) 15 Wetland soil condition B 41 Wildlife barriers WS# 33 Service Area: 9 16 Vegetation(Si cover) 100% Amphibian-breeding potential For functional ratings,please run the 17 Emerg.vegflood resistance B Summarytab report. 42 Hydroperiod adequacy Inadequate 18 Sediment delivery B This report printed on: 12/9/2016 43 Fish presence A 19 Upland soils(soil group) B 44 Overwintering habitat Z0 Stormwater runoff A 21 Subwatershed wetland density B 45 Wildlife species(list) 22 Channels/sheet flow C 46 Fish habitat quality I NA 47 Fish species(list) 23 Adjacent buffer width 0 feet 48 Unique/rare opportunity No Adjacent area management 49 Wetland visibility C 24-A Full 0% 24-B Manicured 0% 50 Proximity to population No 24-C Bare 100% 51 Public ownership C 52 Public access C Adjacent area diversity/structure 53 Human influence on wetland C 25-A Native 0% 54 Human influence on viewshed C 25-B Mixed 0% 55 Spatial buffer C 25-C Sparse 100% 56 Recreational activity potential C S7 Commercial crop--hydro impact NA CDD / $ > / [ { , 0 c c r4 c / \ \ % 2 » co ƒ G CD , # / .0.' ` O / k e N mnk t �Ekk � ' 2D c ' © i $ ( E [) \ / . 2 B / $ ; — - \ % *422 ; == ] $ / (4 ten « k\ | A. 0 2 c \ k k z 777 $ % 2 f ... � � ` - § 2. [ ° §• g 2 E � * / Peek , n ¥ — o nn z 777 2 M47 > 0 4 ] | ( 2 K " 0 20 � ( ` a > ; , [ ° ( ( ! ; A'. E o - A co � � ¥ -. § $ a m ■ = Sli — o o ( � § m ro ezi § 20 ( ( ( % \ ■ ^ $ ft (n \ C \ 0 \ 2 o co \ ,,, Li ' A r - i. .1.1,5.1, / ` 2 0 ftf� ( - 1:1 SI / RJ \ w k 8 2 2 co ( 2 / [ ° \ ( e ! o, k � � P m. % A. Al ; / k % aa S ( 7 a o ? 7 m EV It'. m � Je ° , 222 4. | 2 E cp o / a. o k 4 O / m Cr ; \ I. Cr r o © � ( ® M. - ; � � � ■ J / ; ) 2 fc | ev \ � % § g- ° ` ` ` a A � ; » k ` \ % -u •• E 2 / z em g o o f. A , k , •■ ) [ � a � � ( g o � o ƒ � k % co 2 & a. .• P r P 3 / 7 k@ K. 2 GcrQ ¢ •-e / 14 , E 1 MnRAM: Site Response Record For Wetland: Avienda WL9 Location: 10-116-23-23-001 Avienda Plant Community: Seasonally Flooded Ba Adjacent area slope Cowardin Classification: Circular 39: 26-A Gentle 0% Groundwater-specific questions PEMAd Type 1 26-B Moderate 100% 58 Wetland soils Recharge 26-C Steep 0% 59 Subwatershed land use Recharge 4 Listerd,rare,special species? No 60 Wetland size/soil group Recharge 5 Rare community or habitat? No 61 Wetland hydroperiod Recharge 27 Downstream sens./WQ protect. B 62 Inlet/Outlet configuration Recharge 6 Pre-European-settlement condition? No63 Upland topo relic/ Recharge 28 Nutrient loading C Hydrogeomorphology/topography: 7 Depressional/Tributary Additional information 29 Shoreline wetland? No 64 Restoration potential Yes 8-1 Maximum~Haler depth 1 inches Shoreline Wetland 65 LO affected by restoration A 8-2 %inundated 100% 30 Rooted veg., %cover 0% 9 Immediatedrainage--localiVS 20 acres 31 Wetland in-water width 0 feet 66 Existing size 0.1 10 Esimated size/existing site: (see#66) 32 Enrerg.veg.erosion resistance Restorable size 0 11-Upland Soil 33 Erosion potential of site Potential new wetland 0 34 Upslope veg./bank protection 11-Wetland Soil 67 Average width of pot.buffer 30 feet 35 Rare wildlife? No 68 Ease of potential restoration C 36 Scare/Rare/S1/S2 community No 69 Hydrologic alterations Lowere 37 Vegetative cover NA d Outlet 38 Veg.community interspersion NA 70 Potential wetland type 1 12 Outlet for flood control C 71 Storm water sensitivity C Wetland detritus C 13 Outlet for hydro regime C 39 72 Additional treatment needs A 40 Interspersion on landscape B 14 Dominant upland land use c /5 Wetland soil condition C 41 Wildlife barriers B Watershed Minnesota(Shakopee) 16 Vegetation(41,cover) 50% WS# 33 Service Area: 9 Amphibian-breeding potential 17 Emerg.veg flood resistance c 42 Hyd,operiod adequacy Inadequate For functional ratings, please run the 18 Sediment delivery B Summary tab report. 43 Fish presence A This report printed on: 12/13/2016 19 Upland soils(soil group) B 44 Overwintering habitat 20 Stormwater runoff A 21 Subtiwatershed wetland density B 45 Wildlife species(list) 22 Channels/sheet•flow A 46 Fish habitat quality NA 47 Fish species(list) 23 Adjacent buffer width 0 feet 48 Unique/rare opportunity NO Adjacent area management 49 Wetland risibility C 24-A Full 0% 24-B Manicured 0% 50 Proximity to population No 24-C Bare 100% 51 Public ownership C S2 Public access C Adjacent area diversity/structure 53 Human influence on wetland C 25-A Native 0% 54 Human influence on viewshed C 25-B Mixed 0% 55 Spatial buffer C 25-C Sparse 100% 56 Recreational activity potential C 57 Commercial crop--hydro impact C D C co E co ti N R > ti H. a b a A �' n 'il. ., a o o �4 o p R 0.11 3 .3 n R co o b co 1 0)co n `, c• c a CD x S o G R n 3 v 4 n ti. co .n, �o c m o CZ o p C 7 A , O .1. 3 N W A 9 n R Z R ° N O CO, o o R, w Z d ° rt o ° y a S Nt cont.. O DCI -0 o A0 R n co rz e g. a p. i z 3 cr Z: 0 3 m n `° m eti FT TA: fi a n o o R C a O a "O O ''�' a0 �T 0 t" A ro A o• a n c m •1 s -4 o Z. se # a oo -I n - w ri b A O $. o C n n'x7 h o R e cn nb 13 CO Za,. a �. o c a m = °' ; CD = ti s o q3 z ° ° 3 m -o o i a -o o n m65 o �. Cl) `r eT C �� o CM y = do• oA q a. O � °n �°s A IS: 0 0 0 h b d 2A z a:, it, a O 4 A C� m cp o.♦ C o ? i"7 00 a «. y f-n c c I. O A 0 a z 2. ro ° b � in Z. Z k 0'p v o A c R o b crC ?, E ,.. v_ o t o a ' c a * z --. c U_ �' 3 a ' i R. Ar 4. a o b a c co o " a b o ft 0 ° o °' d. co (Ti e S z u = a b 3. fD a 8 o otic ti s w °• ° Ra 0 0 $ a ct s 42 - a a° a Z ' 5.: p a p „ fD , a 0 z m 4t1 t,t a o A p ° o 0 m m Oq a.0co c co) 4.. 0 o x o a 5 e 3 �. R W p o p A ti 't ti Z 1 ti a m o ` ,••••• C �- A, co y MnRAM: Site Response Record For Wetland: Avienda WL10 Location: 10-116-23-23-001 Avienda Plant Community: Seasonally Flooded Ba Adjacent area slope Cowardin Classification: Circular 39: 26-A Gentle 100% Groundwater-specific questions PF01 A Type 1 26-B Moderate 0% 58 Wetland soils Recharge 26-C Steep 0% 59 Subwatershed land use Recharge 4 Listed,rare,special species? No 60 Wetland size/soil group Recharge 5 61 Wetland hydroperiod Recharge Rare community or habitat? No 27 Downstream sens./WQ protect. A 62 Inlet/Outlet configuration Recharge 6 Pre-European-settlement condition? No - 63 Upland topo relief Recharge 28 Nutrient loading A Hydrogeomorphology/topography: 7 Depressional/Isolated Additional information 29 Shoreline wetland? No G4 Restoration potential No 8_1 Maximum water depth 12 inche Shoreline Wetland 65 LO affected by restoration 8-2 %inundated 100% 30 Rooted veg.,%cover 0% 9 Immediate drainage--local WS 15 acres 31 Wetland in-water width 0 feet 66 Existing size 0.07 10 Esimated size/existing site: (see#66) 32 Emerg.veg.erosion resistance Restorable size 0 33 Erosion potential of site Potential new wetland 0 11-Upland Soil 34 Upslope veg./bank protection 11-Wetland Soil 67 Average width of pot buffer 0 feet 35 Rare wildlife? No 68 Ease of potential restoration 36 Scare/Rare/S1/S2 community No 69 Hydrologic alterations 0 37 Vegetative cover NA 70 Potential wetland type 0 38 Veg.community interspersion NA 71 Stormwater sensitivity Exceptions 12 Outlet forflood control B 39 Wetland detritus C 72 Additional treatment needs C 13 Outlet for hydro regime A 40 Interspersion on landscape A 14 Dominant upland land use A A Watershed Minnesota(Shakopee) /5 Wetland soil condition A 41 Wildlife barriers WS# 33 Service Area: 9 16 Vegetation(%cover) 30% Amphibian-breeding potential For functional ratings, please run the 17 Emerg.veg flood resistance NA Summarytab report. 42 Hydroperiod adequacy Adequate 18 Sediment delivery A This report printed on: 12/10/2016 43 Fish presence A 19 Upland soils(soil group) B 44 Overwintering habitat 20 Stormwater runoff C 21 Subwatershed wetland density B 45 Wildlife species(list) 22 Channels/sheet flow A 46 Fish habitat quality NA 47 Fish species(list) 23 Adjacent buffer width 50 feet 48 Unique/rare opportunity No Adjacent area management 49 Wetland visibility C 24-A Full 100% 50 Proximity to population No 24-B Manicured o% 24-c Bare 0% SI Public ownership C 52 Public access C Adjacent area diversity/structure 53 Human influence on wetland A 25-A Native 75% 54 Human influence on viewshed A 25-B Mixed 25% 55 Spatial buffer I A 25-C Sparse 0% 56 Recreational activity potential I B 57 Commercial crop--hydro impact NA D �I Q Q co f Co m ry ,f c0 7 n c y c o A co A 3 a. 4 A .O`co K 7 Q O 3 y o o ° A. ft m 'S' N b r r F a- Q ti A a o A n �a C a t r_ m 74 a �' R s a. o O rn *. v1 , " a" cso 4.1 sy w c e 0 0 o y A 4. ?ro ., s o D O a 2 - O A V O g 4' p m Q' O O• Z. 3 0ft - Cp A n',c4, 77 fti1, m m 7 7 An Y. x- o d -0 y 0 'o a R 7 m cn m ; o 0 o r_..?' r s m A D CO T p % t' 2 a g. O R 9 v m CI .•< w .' o CD m • V° n � y y O a. o = n R 1., m o ii s m p = a o E. P,' 3 3' C a- v t co aZ m � , � v ami a- c 3 q" z CD C 0 0) o. o 0 m F0 a o0 n m m Qm *,`a s' Cr?) ti <p 'UOi 3 ,s,......,-, ti N N A �0 4 _� ^�. W R A co O b b m Og.3 O' oo 0 0 0 a ", 01� ill' s c m m °a C 8. o •= 3 ^7 z C 4. @ w a c z ;ti a `c `� 8 g g• o. 4 d 0 oz ° i a 3 0 0 0 ' %b � a o m ii o@ o@ 0 ~ a te" b o 0 3 v° �' a m m m do a a • a 14 o o ro � , iy 0 0 4 i a' Q m N a s R^„ C m m N a a i5,3. E"' a. 10 o n o a o a o a ;o g c z c0) 0 o 03 o o Q A ? o a 4 0'0 O D o 0 CD m m � � o y 4` o o. s' O • p3 0 c a: Q a R d R y�• o o N 4 R C o N 0 Q. 0 a 0 Q, 0 z C m ,� R a. o tD o al oa. o Q q ~ w N m cm) .4 0'q ft MnRAM: Site Response Record For Wetland: Avienda MnDOT WL Location: 10-116-23-23-001 Avienda Plant Community: Deep Marsh 25-A Native 25% 55 Spatial buffer C Cowardin Classification: Circular 39: 25-B Mixed 50% S6 Recreational activitypotential B PEMF Type 4 ° 25-C Sparse 25% Plant Community: Shrub Carr S7 Commercial crop--hydro impact NA Cowardin Classification: Circular 39: Adjacent area slope PSS1 B Type 6 26-A Gentle 0% Groundwater-specific questions Plant Community: Fresh(Wet)Meadow26-B Moderate 100% S8 Wetland soils Recharge Cowardin Classification: Circular 39: 26-C Steep 0% S9 Subwatershed land use Recharge PEM1A Type 1 60 Wetland size/soil group Recharge 4 Listed,rare,special species? No 61 Wetland hydroperiod Discharge 27 Downstream sens./WQ protect. B 62 Inlet/Outlet configuration Discharge 5 Rare community or habitat? No 28 Nutrient loading B 63 Upland topo relief Discharge 6 Pre-European-settlement condition? No Hydrogeomorphology/topography: 29 Shoreline wetland? No Additional information 7 Depressional/Tributary 64 Restoration potential No Shoreline Wetland 65 LO affected by restoration 84 Maximum waterdepth 48 inche 30 Rooted veg.,%cover 0% 8_2 %inundated 60% 31 Wetland in-water width 0 feet 66 Existing size 11.5 9 Immediate drainage--local WS 60 acres 32 Emerg.veg.erosion resistance Restorable size 0 10 Esimated size/existing site: (see#66) 33 Erosion potential of site Potential new wetland 0 34 Upslope veg./bank protection 11-Upland Soil 67 Average width of pot.buffer 0 feet 35 Rare wildlife? No 11-Wetland Soil 68 Ease of potential restoration 36 Scare/Rare/S1/S2 community No 69 Hydrologic alterations 0 37 Vegetative cover NA 70 Potential wetland type 0 38 Veg.community interspersion B 71 Stormwater sensitivity A 39 Wetland detritus B 72 Additional treatment needs C 12 Outlet forflood control B 40 Interspersion on landscape A 13 Outlet for hydro regime B 41 Wildlife barriers B Watershed Minnesota(Shakopee) 14 Dominant upland land use B WS# 33 Service Area: 9 15 Wetland soil condition A Amphibian-breeding potential For functional ratings, please run the 16 Vegetation(%cover) 75°i° 42 Hydroperiod adequacy Adequate Summary tab report. 17 Emerg.veg flood resistance B43 Fish presence A This report printed on: 12/9/2016 18 Sediment delivery B 44 Overwintering habitat B 19 Upland soils(soil group) B 45 Wildlife species(list) 20 Stormwater runoff A 21 Subwatershed wetland density B 46 Fish habitat quality NA 22 Channels/sheet flow A 47 Fish species(list) 48 Unique/rare opportunity No 23 Adjacent buffer width 40 feet 49 Wetland visibility B Adjacent area management 50 Proximity to population Yes 24-A Full 70% 51 Public ownership A 24-B Manicured 0% S2 Public access C 24-C Bare 30% 53 Human influence on wetland A Adjacent area diversity/structure S4 Human influence on viewshed C