The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda and PacketAGENDA CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, MAY 14, 2018 CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD A.5:30 P.M. WORK SESSION TO BE HELD IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS Note: Work sessions are open to the public.If the City Council does not complete the work session items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regular agenda. 1.2040 Comprehensive Plan 2.Franchise Fee Update 3.Identify Key Strategies for Downtown Vision Plan B.7:00 P.M. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING CALL TO ORDER C.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS 1.Presentation of Certificates of Appreciation to Outgoing Commissioners 2.Presentation of Maple Leaf Award to Senior Commissioner Camille Swanson (2012 2017) D.CONSENT AGENDA All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council and will be considered as one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item. Refer to the council packet for each staff report. 1.Approval of City Council Minutes dated April 23, 2018 2.Approve Temporary OnSale Liquor License, July 3 & 4,The Rotary Club of Chanhassen 3.Approve a Massage Therapy Business License for Spalon Montage 4.Approve Resolution No. 201834 Approving Limited Use Permit Amendment for Panera Bread 5.Approval of Consent of Mortgage Holder to Reciprocal Easement and Maintenance Agreement between Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC and Chanhassen Gateway Place, LLC AGENDACHANHASSEN CITY COUNCILMONDAY, MAY 14, 2018CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARDA.5:30 P.M. WORK SESSION TO BE HELD IN COUNCIL CHAMBERSNote: Work sessions are open to the public.If the City Council does not complete the worksession items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regularagenda.1.2040 Comprehensive Plan2.Franchise Fee Update3.Identify Key Strategies for Downtown Vision PlanB.7:00 P.M. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING CALL TO ORDERC.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS1.Presentation of Certificates of Appreciation to Outgoing Commissioners2.Presentation of Maple Leaf Award to Senior Commissioner Camille Swanson (20122017)D.CONSENT AGENDAAll items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council andwill be considered as one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items. Ifdiscussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and consideredseparately. City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item. Refer to thecouncil packet for each staff report.1.Approval of City Council Minutes dated April 23, 20182.Approve Temporary OnSale Liquor License, July 3 & 4,The Rotary Club ofChanhassen3.Approve a Massage Therapy Business License for Spalon Montage4.Approve Resolution No. 201834 Approving Limited Use Permit Amendment forPanera Bread5.Approval of Consent of Mortgage Holder to Reciprocal Easement and Maintenance Agreement between Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC and Chanhassen Gateway Place, LLC E.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS F.PUBLIC HEARINGS G.NEW BUSINESS 1.West Water Treatment Plant Update H.COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS I.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS J.CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION 1.Review of Claims Paid 05112018 2.New Businesses issued Sign Permits in January, February, and March, 2018 K.ADJOURNMENT L.GUIDELINES GUIDELINES FOR VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Welcome to the Chanhassen City Council Meeting. In the interest of open communications, the Chanhassen City Council wishes to provide an opportunity for the public to address the City Council. That opportunity is provided at every regular City Council meeting during Visitor Presentations. Anyone indicating a desire to speak during Visitor Presentations will be acknowledged by the Mayor. When called upon to speak, state your name, address, and topic. All remarks shall be addressed to the City Council as a whole, not to any specific member(s) or to any person who is not a member of the City Council. If there are a number of individuals present to speak on the same topic, please designate a spokesperson that can summarize the issue. Limit your comments to five minutes. Additional time may be granted at the discretion of the Mayor. If you have written comments, provide a copy to the Council. During Visitor Presentations, the Council and staff listen to comments and will not engage in discussion. Council members or the City Manager may ask questions of you in order to gain a thorough understanding of your concern, suggestion or request. Please be aware that disrespectful comments or comments of a personal nature, directed at an individual either by name or inference, will not be allowed. Personnel concerns should be directed to the City Manager. Members of the City Council and some staff members may gather at Applebee's, 590 West 79th Street in Chanhassen immediately after the meeting for a purely social event. All members of the public are welcome. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, May 14, 2018 Subject 2040 Comprehensive Plan Section 5:30 P.M. WORK SESSION TO BE HELD IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS Item No: A.1. Prepared By Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director File No: GEN130 SUMMARY Staff is providing City Council with an update of the status of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. BACKGROUND Comprehensive Plan Updates On October 9, 2017 the City Council authorized distribution of the draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan for jurisdictional review. On April 3, 2018, staff provided an update on the jurisdictional comments that the city had received to date regarding the draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan as well as our proposed responses. The sixmonth jurisdictional review period ended on April 20, 2018. The Planning Commission was in concurrence with the proposed changes. They did request that we clarify the instances when urban services would not be required as part of the subdivision process. Water Resources Coordinator Vanessa Strong discussed the draft Local Surface Water Management Plan (LSWMP) and the status of the LSWMP. She noted that the Watershed Districts have requested an extension of their review periods. The LSWMP is a required element of the comprehensive plan but has a separate review requirement with the watershed districts. The Planning Commission summary minutes for April 3, 2018 are in the April 23, 2018 consent agenda. RECOMMENDATION Staff is requesting that City Council provide comments and direction regarding the draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, May 14, 2018Subject2040 Comprehensive PlanSection5:30 P.M. WORK SESSION TO BEHELD IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS Item No: A.1.Prepared By Kate Aanenson, CommunityDevelopment Director File No: GEN130SUMMARYStaff is providing City Council with an update of the status of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan.BACKGROUNDComprehensive Plan UpdatesOn October 9, 2017 the City Council authorized distribution of the draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan for jurisdictionalreview. On April 3, 2018, staff provided an update on the jurisdictional comments that the city had received to date regardingthe draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan as well as our proposed responses. The sixmonth jurisdictional review periodended on April 20, 2018. The Planning Commission was in concurrence with the proposed changes. They did request that we clarify theinstances when urban services would not be required as part of the subdivision process.Water Resources Coordinator Vanessa Strong discussed the draft Local Surface Water Management Plan (LSWMP)and the status of the LSWMP. She noted that the Watershed Districts have requested an extension of their reviewperiods. The LSWMP is a required element of the comprehensive plan but has a separate review requirement withthe watershed districts.The Planning Commission summary minutes for April 3, 2018 are in the April 23, 2018 consent agenda.RECOMMENDATION Staff is requesting that City Council provide comments and direction regarding the draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan. ATTACHMENTS: Planning Commission Staff Report Jurisdictional Review Summary Local Water Management Plan Update Draft Local Water Management Plan TAZ Map TAZ summary table revised Local Surface Water Management Plan City Council Draft LWMP Comments 2018 Agency Comments Received Comments Addressed Total: 21 14 6 City of Eden Prairie Yes In progress City of Shorewood Yes In progress City of Victoria Yes Yes City of Shakopee Hennepin County Housing, Community Works & Transit Engineering and Public Works Yes?In progress Carver County Engineering and Public Works, Planning & Water Management, Parks Yes In progress Scott County Engineering and Public Works, Natural Resources and Environmental Yes In progress Jackson Township Yes Yes Minnetonka School District 276 Yes Yes Eastern Carver County School District Yes Yes City of Chaska City of Minnetonka MN Dept. of Transportation Yes In progress Southwest Transit Yes In progress Riley, Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Lower Minnesota Watershed District Metropolitan Council Local Planning, MCES Yes In progress Eden Prairie School District #272 Yes Yes MN Department of Natural Resources Yes Yes MN Department of Natural Resources Metro Region Waters Jurisdictional Comments Local Water Management Plan Review Draft City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us January 2018 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MN City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Local Stormwater Management Plan Adopted xxxxxxxxxxx, 2018 COUNCIL: Mayor Denny Laufenburger Bethany Tjornhom Jerry McDonald Elise Ryan Dan Campion STAFF: Vanessa Strong Paul Oehme Terry Jeffery Photos: City of Chanhassen Wenck Associates, Inc. WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC.: Diane Spector Erik Megow Todd Shoemaker, P.E. File 1481-0013 Prepared by: WENCK Associates, Inc. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Maple Plain, MN 55359 Phone: 763-479-4200 Fax: 763-479-4242 [This page intentionally blank for printing] Table of Contents Page | i REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE ............................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Purpose of Plan ................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Relationship to Other City Plans ......................................................................... 1-1 1.2.1 Comprehensive Plan............................................................................ 1-1 1.2.2 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program ....................................... 1-1 1.2.3 Wellhead Protection Plan ................................................................... 1-2 1.2.4 Bluff Creek Natural Resources Management Plan .............................. 1-2 1.3 Relationship to Other Plans ................................................................................ 1-3 1.3.1 Metropolitan Council Water Resources Policy Plan............................ 1-3 1.3.2 Minnesota River Basin Plan ................................................................. 1-3 1.4 Relationship to Other Regulatory Agencies ........................................................ 1-3 2.0 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK .................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Chanhassen Ordinances and Policies .................................................................. 2-1 2.2 State Agency Regulatory Framework ................................................................. 2-1 2.2.1 Metropolitan Council .......................................................................... 2-2 2.2.2 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency .................................................. 2-2 2.2.3 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources .................................... 2-2 2.2.4 Minnesota Department of Health ....................................................... 2-3 2.2.5 Carver County and Carver SWCD ........................................................ 2-3 2.2.6 Watershed Districts and WMOs .......................................................... 2-4 2.3 Wetland Conservation Act .................................................................................. 2-6 2.4 Relationship to NPDES Stormwater Permit ........................................................ 2-6 2.5 Water Resource Related Agreements ................................................................ 2-6 3.0 ASSESSMENT OF PROBLEMS ................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Hydrologic Modeling ........................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 Areas of Known Flooding .................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Impaired Waters ................................................................................................. 3-1 3.3 TMDLs and UAAs ................................................................................................. 3-2 3.3.1 Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Studies ........................................ 3-2 3.3.2 UAAs .................................................................................................... 3-3 3.4 Problems and Issues ........................................................................................... 3-4 4.0 GOALS AND POLICIES ............................................................................................................ 4-1 4.1 Goals and Policies ............................................................................................... 4-1 5.0 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ....................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Permitting and Enforcement .............................................................................. 5-1 5.1.1 Current Ordinances and Potential Revisions ...................................... 5-1 5.1.2 NPDES Permit Implementation Requirements ................................... 5-5 5.2 Implementation Programs and Projects ............................................................. 5-5 5.2.1 Education and Outreach Program ....................................................... 5-5 5.2.2 Monitoring Program ............................................................................ 5-6 5.2.3 Operations and Maintenance ............................................................. 5-7 5.2.4 Capital Improvement Program ............................................................ 5-8 Table of Contents Page | ii REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 5.3 Implementation Plan Funding ............................................................................ 5-8 5.4 Addressing Identified Problems and Issues ...................................................... 5-11 6.0 AMENDMENTS TO THE PLAN ................................................................................................ 6-1 6.1.1 WMO Plan Amendments..................................................................... 6-1 6.1.2 Major Plan Amendments .................................................................... 6-1 6.1.3 Routine Updates .................................................................................. 6-1 7.0 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................... 7-1 TABLES Table 3.1. Impaired Waters in Chanhassen. .............................................................................................. 3-1 Table 3.2. Problems, issues, and opportunities. ........................................................................................ 3-4 Table 4.1. Water resources management goals. ....................................................................................... 4-1 Table 4.2. Comparison of TP-40 to Atlas 14 event depths......................................................................... 4-2 Table 4.3. Agencies with regulatory authority. .......................................................................................... 4-6 Table 5.1. Regulatory requirements of various agencies compared to Chanhassen current ordinances. 5-2 Table 5.2. Chanhassen LWMP Implementation Plan 2018-2027............................................................... 5-9 Table 5.3. Chanhassen LWMP Implementation Plan 2018-2027 by year. ............................................... 5-10 Table 5.4. Implementation actions addressing identified problems and issues...................................... 5-11 FIGURES Figure 1.1. City of Chanhassen in located in the Twin Cities Metro Area, Minnesota. ............................... vii Figure 2.1. Watershed Management Organizations in Chanhassen. ........................................................ 2-5 APPENDICES Appendix A: Land and Water Resources Inventory Appendix B: Hydrologic Modeling Update Acronyms Page | iii REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 AIS Aquatic Invasive Species BMP Best Management Practice BWSR Board of Water and Soil Resources cfs cubic feet per second cfu colony-forming unit Chl-a Chlorophyll-a CIP Capital Improvement Program DNR Department of Natural Resources DO Dissolved Oxygen EPA or USEPA US Environmental Protection Agency F-IBI Index of Biotic Integrity for Fish LA Load Allocation LWMP Local Water Management Plan Met Council Metropolitan Council mg/L milligrams per liter M-IBI Index of Biotic Integrity for Macroinvertebrates MPCA Minnesota Pollution Control Agency MS4 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NWI National Wetland Inventory SD Secchi depth SWCD Soil and Water Conservation District SWPPP Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load TP Total phosphorus TSS Total suspended solids µg/L microgram per liter WLA Wasteload Allocation WD Watershed District WMO Watershed Management Organization Executive Summary Page | iv REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 The City of Chanhassen, Minnesota is located in northeastern Carver County (see Figure 1.1), except for one small area in Hennepin County. It is bordered on the east by the City of Eden Prairie; on the north by Shorewood; and on the west by Victoria and Chaska. Its southern border is the Minnesota River. The City has land in four watersheds: the Carver WMO, Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek, Minnehaha Creek, and the Lower Minnesota River Watershed Districts. This Local Water Management Plan (LWMP) was prepared in conformance with Minnesota Statutes 103B.235 and Minnesota Rules 8410. This plan is intended to provide the City of Chanhassen with information and direction in the administration and implementation of water resource management activities within the City during the period 2018-2027. It serves as a guide to projects, provides for effective allocation of resources, and sets forth a funding plan for projects and programs over the next 5 to 10 years. A number of water resources-related problems, issues and requirements were identified in this planning process. These include: • The reissue of the State of Minnesota’s NPDES General Stormwater Permit in 2013 requires local governments such as Chanhassen to adopt and enforce standards and ordinances for development and redevelopment which limits stormwater runoff from sites over one acre in size. • New or expanded maintenance and administrative responsibilities are required in the NPDES permit to control runoff and protect and improve water quality from City owned or maintained land. • All 4 WMO’s are updating their 10 year Comprehensive Plans. The City is required to amend their LWMP to be consistent with each WMO • In order to maintain and/or obtain primary responsibility for managing local water resources additional ordinance revisions are required. The alternative is to defer the authority to the local WMO • Some of the lakes and streams in the City do not meet the state’s water quality standards for recreation and aquatic life. • Stream gullies and escarpments are contributing excess sediment into Bluff Creek and the Minnesota River. The LWMP updates the City’s goals and related policies to address the problems and issues that were evaluated for the updated LWMP. The goals are as follows: Executive Summary Page | v REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 Implementation This LWMP includes an Implementation Plan to help achieve those goals through capital projects, management programs, and operations and maintenance activities. Capital Projects. The Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek WD has completed Use Attainability Assessments (UAAs) and/or Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies for some of the waterbodies in the City. These studies have identified potential actions that could help protect or improve water quality. The City evaluates partnership opportunities with the Districts to undertake priority projects as project plans develop. In addition, the City has been systematically surveying the condition of storm drainage system features. These condition assessments have identified a number of potential improvement projects, and priority actions are included in the Implementation Plan. The Implementation Plan also includes projects to install water quality Best Management Practices (BMPs) with street or other construction projects. Management Programs. The City operates several programs that directly or indirectly affect water resources, including a Public Education and Outreach program. A variety of social and traditional media are also used to inform and educate citizens. City and partnership events, workshops and festivals provide additional opportunities for education. The City of Chanhassen collaborates with the Metropolitan Council to participate in its Citizen Assisted Monitoring Program (CAMP). Volunteer residents take samples from the following lakes: Lake Lucy, Lake Minnewashta, Lake Riley, Lake St. Joe, Lake Susan, and Lotus Lake. Aquatic Invasive Species management is implemented through a partnership with Carver County WMO, Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District, and local Lake Associations. Operations and Maintenance Activities. The City undertakes a variety of operations and maintenance actions, including actions required by its NPDES MS4 Permit. These include ongoing water body inventory and condition assessments, erosion control monitoring, street sweeping, stormwater system inspection, maintenance and repairs, road salt management, and a general education and outreach program. Goal 1.Promote abstraction through infiltration, reuse and other methods where practicable to do so to provide flood protection, ground water recharge and improved water quality. Goal 2. Achieve water quality standards in lakes, streams, and wetlands consistent with their designated uses and established classifications. Goal 3. Protect and rehabilitate wetlands to maintain or improve their function and value. Goal 4. Prevent contamination of the aquifers and promote groundwater recharge to maintain base flows in streams and wetlands. Goal 5. Maintain primary responsibility for managing water resources at the local level where efficient to do so but continue coordination and cooperation with other agencies and organizations. Goal 6. Cultivate an environmentally literate public to promote an active community role in sustainable management of water resources. Executive Summary Page | vi REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 Plan Updates Section 6 of this Plan sets forth a process to update the LWMP in response to city operations, budget planning, work requirements or WMO plan revisions. The Implementation Plan and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) will be reviewed and updated periodically by the City as needed based on new information or as new opportunities and requirements arise. At a minimum, the CIP will be updated biannually. Major issues that result in potential significant revisions to the LWMP will be forwarded to the Watershed Districts and WMO for discussion and review to determine if the LWMP will require a formal update. Page | vii REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 Figure 1.1. City of Chanhassen in located in the Twin Cities Metro Area, Minnesota. Page | 1-1 REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 1.0 Introduction and Purpose 1.1 PURPOSE OF PLAN The City of Chanhassen is located in Carver County within the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area (Figure 1.1). This Local Water Management Plan (LWMP) describes how the City of Chanhassen will fulfill the requirements of Minnesota Statutes 103B.235 and Minnesota Rules 8410 in the management of the water resources within the city during the period 2018-2027. It is a summary of the city’s management goals and policies, and strategies, including a capital improvement program and review of local policies and ordinances. Minnesota Statutes 103B.231 establishes the purposes of water management planning in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area as to: 1. Protect, preserve, and use natural surface and groundwater storage and retention systems 2. Minimize public capital expenditures needed to correct flooding and water quality problems 3. Identify and plan for means to effectively protect and improve surface and groundwater quality 4. Establish more uniform local policies and official controls for surface and groundwater management 5. Prevent erosion of soil into surface water systems 6. Promote groundwater recharge 7. Protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat and water recreational facilities 8. Secure the other benefits associated with the proper management of surface and ground water Minnesota statutes and administrative rules also require that City management of its water resources be consistent with the requirements of the four watershed districts having land within its borders: Riley- Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District; Minnehaha Creek Watershed District; Carver County WMO; and the Lower Minnesota River Watershed Management District. 1.2 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER CITY PLANS This LWMP is intended to address surface water management; ground water supply and wellhead protection planning are separate from this Plan except as surface water management influences groundwater. 1.2.1 Comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive Plan is a blueprint for how the City manages its land use. The Metropolitan Council in accordance with the Metropolitan Land Planning Act develops and updates regional planning policies and requires that all cities periodically update their Comprehensive Plans to be consistent with those policy plans. Thrive MSP 2040 and the 2040 Water Resources Policy Plan identify certain required elements of local water resources planning. This Local Water Management Plan Update meets those requirements. 1.2.2 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program Chanhassen is regulated by the State of Minnesota’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Stormwater Permit as a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4). In accordance Page | 1-2 REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 with that permit, the City developed a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) comprised of a series of Best Management Practices (BMPs) in six Minimum Control Measure (MCM) areas to prevent pollution and to manage and treat runoff discharged from the city into state waters. An annual report documents the specific actions taken in the previous year, which is presented to the public for review, approved by the City Council, and submitted to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) for approval. In 2006 the City was one of 30 cities statewide selected by the MPCA to undertake a special Nondegradation Assessment as part of its NPDES permit. The purpose of the study was to assess changes in stormwater runoff volume, total suspended solids (TSS) and total phosphorus (TP) loading since 1988, and to predict how land change expected to 2020 would impact those parameters. The study found that while runoff volumes had increased, pollutant loading had decreased as a result of City and watershed district water quality treatment requirements. A new General Permit became effective August 1, 2013, and the City and other MS4s were required to prepare a new SWPPP and submit obtain renewal of coverage under the permit. Many of those BMPs are incorporated into this LWMP. 1.2.3 Wellhead Protection Plan Minnesota state statutes require the owners and operators of public drinking water systems to prevent contamination of public water supply wells by effectively managing potential contaminant sources in the area which contributes water to those wells. They must prepare a wellhead protection plan which includes: a map showing the boundaries of the delineated wellhead protection area, a vulnerability assessment of the well and the wellhead protection area, an inventory of potential sources of contamination within the wellhead protection area, a plan to manage and monitor existing and proposed potential sources of contamination, and a contingency strategy for an alternate water supply should the water supply be disrupted by contamination or mechanical failure. The City’s Wellhead Protection Plan (WHPP) addresses the ten municipal supply wells used by the City. Initially completed in 2002, it was updated in 2011 to include new wells and additional analysis. The WHPP includes an identification of a Wellhead Protection Area and an assessment of the vulnerability of the wells to contamination. One well, an emergency backup well, was identified as vulnerable to surface contamination, while the other wells were classified as not vulnerable. The uppermost source water aquifer within the Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA) was identified as having mostly low vulnerability to surface contamination. Infiltration of stormwater is not desirable where the DWSMA indicates the aquifer is vulnerable to contamination from the surface, and other stormwater BMPs are recommended. DWSMA vulnerability is further described at the subwatershed level in Appendix A of this Plan. 1.2.4 Bluff Creek Natural Resources Management Plan The Bluff Creek Natural Resources Management Plan was completed in 1996. The Management Plan identified high-quality natural features for preservation as well as potential restoration projects. To protect this area, several zoning and land use recommendations were intended to minimize new impervious surface, control and limit stormwater runoff and pollutant loading, and protect or enhance wildlife corridors and connectivity. Many of these recommendations were incorporated into the Bluff Creek Overlay District zoning ordinance enacted in 1998. Maintaining and enforcing stormwater Page | 1-3 REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 management requirements through this Plan and the Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District are integral to achieving the goals of the Bluff Creek Plan. 1.3 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PLANS Several agencies manage programs or regulate activities for local stormwater or water resource management. The following sections summarize those relevant to local water management planning. 1.3.1 Metropolitan Council Water Resources Policy Plan The Metropolitan Council’s Water Resources Management Policy Plan is a framework to integrate water resources management and protection with planning for the Metro region’s growth. In 1995, the Metropolitan Land Planning Act was amended to require that each city and township's comprehensive plan include a local water management plan. These local plans need to be consistent with Minnesota Statutes 103B and Metropolitan Land Planning Act requirements. Local water management plans are reviewed by the Met Council as part of the local comprehensive planning process prior to their approval by the WMO and adoption by the city or township. In addition to the local stormwater plan elements required in statute and administrative rule, the Policy Plan expects communities to show that they are committed to the Met Council’s goal of no adverse impact (nondegradation) for area water resources. Local plans should include actions such as ordinances requiring runoff water quality treatment and limiting the rates and volumes of runoff; adopting Best Management Practices for development and redevelopment; and wetland management planning. The Policy Plan places a special emphasis on nondegradation of lakes identified as Priority Lakes. The Met Council defines Priority Lakes as lakes of high regional recreational value that are at least 100 acres in size; supply drinking water; have very good water quality; or have exceptional significance for wildlife habitat. Lakes in Chanhassen that have been designated as Metro Priority Lakes are: Minnewashta, Ann, Lotus, and Riley. 1.3.2 Minnesota River Basin Plan The Minnesota River flows southeast from its source at Big Stone Lake on the South Dakota border to Mankato then northeast to join the Mississippi River at Fort Snelling (about 335 total miles). It covers approximately 16,770 square miles, roughly 10 million acres. Thirteen major watersheds in Minnesota drain into the basin, which touches 37 counties. Most of Chanhassen is located in the Lower Minnesota River subbasin. The 2001 Minnesota River Basin Plan (MPCA 2001) lays out a broad framework for directing environmental programs toward improving water quality in the Minnesota River, its tributaries and other water bodies. Priority actions include reducing nutrient, sediment, and bacteria inputs to the River and improving the health of biologic communities. 1.4 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER REGULATORY AGENCIES The LWMP is intended to meet requirements outlined in Minnesota Rules 8410 and Minnesota Statutes 103B as well as provide a user-friendly tool for day-to-day management of the City’s water resources. The LWMP provides the following information, as required in the Minn. Statutes 103B.235. • Existing and proposed physical environment and land use within the City • Drainage areas and the volumes, rates, and paths of stormwater runoff • Identification of stormwater storage areas Page | 1-4 REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 • Performance standards for water quality and water quantity protection • Implementation program • Capital improvement program The Plan was also written with consideration of the needs, requirements and direction outlined in the following: • Local Water Management Rules – Minn. Rules 8410 • Wetland Conservation Act – Minn. Rules 8420 • Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Water Quality Standards – Minn. Rules 7050 • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Clean Water Act • Metropolitan Council Water Resources Policy Plan May 2005 • Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District Water Management Plan - January 2011 • Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan – April 2007/ January 2018 • Carver County WMO Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan – October 2010 • Lower Minnesota River Watershed District Water Management Plan - December 2011 • Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act (Chapter 601, Laws of 1990) • Use Attainability Analyses (UAAs) for lakes and streams in the city • The approved TMDLs for turbidity and fish biotic impairments in Bluff Creek The watershed organizations and their respective jurisdictions within the City are shown on Figure 2.1. The LWMP is intended to satisfy the rules set forth in the current watershed management plans. The City will participate in upcoming revisions, evaluate any future watershed management plan amendments in relation to the LWMP and incorporate items as needed. Page | 2-1 REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 2.0 Regulatory Framework 2.1 CHANHASSEN ORDINANCES AND POLICIES The City has enacted several ordinances to protect and manage its water resources. Chapter 19 of Chanhassen City code addresses design standards and requirements for water and sewers. Article V addresses illicit discharge detection and elimination within Chanhassen storm sewer systems. Article VII spells out development standards and design elements intended to implement the standards and achieve the goals set forth in this plan in order to preserve, protect and improve the city’s surface water resources. Specific elements within Article VII include erosion prevention and sediment control requirements, hydrologic and hydraulic design elements, water quality, rate control and volume reduction requirements. Those design standards include more stringent requirements for developments that discharge into Assumption Creek. That Article also establishes a Surface Water Management Utility and associated fees for operation of this utility. Chapter 20 is the City’s Zoning Code. Article VI establishes wetland management classifications and standards for managing and protecting wetlands in the city. The City of Chanhassen is the responsible Local Government Unit (LGU) for the administration of the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) in all areas of the city. This article includes standards for setbacks and for establishing and maintaining buffer strips adjacent to wetlands, and policies and procedures for altering wetlands and mitigating impacts to wetland functions and values. Article V establishes the City’s Floodplain Overlay District and floodplain management standards. The ordinance establishes the regulatory flood protection elevation as no lower than two feet above the elevation of the regional flood. The ordinance also establishes what land uses may occur within the Overlay District under what conditions. Article VII sets forth the City’s Shoreland Management District ordinances. The lakes and streams within the city that are regulated under this ordinance are established by management classification. The article includes minimum lot size and width requirements, structure and onsite sewage system setbacks, and limitations on altering and clearing vegetation and adding impervious surface. Article XXVIII establishes bluff protection standards in general. Article XXXI establishes the Bluff Creek Overlay District and standards for protecting the quality and extent of the natural features within the District, which is centered on Bluff Creek. The Overlay District defines a Primary Zone, which is intended to be Open Space, and a Secondary Zone, in which regulated development may occur. Within this Secondary Zone, the ordinance requires a more stringent bluff setback; limits the amount of impervious surface allowed based on bluff slope; encourages terrain- adaptive architecture and density clustering; and requires preservation of natural habitat or, within the Secondary Zone, mitigation of any unavoidable impacts. 2.2 STATE AGENCY REGULATORY FRAMEWORK Many agencies manage programs or regulate activities for local stormwater or water resource management. The following sections summarize those of primary relevance to urban local water management planning. Page | 2-2 REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 2.2.1 Metropolitan Council The Metropolitan Council’s Water Resources Management Policy Plan includes a range of programs administered by various governmental and private agencies for management of water resources in the Metro area. Several of Met Council’s programs of interest to cities include the following: • Development of targeted watershed pollutant loads • Review of watershed and local water plans and comprehensive plans for consistency with metropolitan goals and objectives • Watershed Outlet Monitoring Program (WOMP) • Citizens’ Assisted Lake Monitoring Program (CAMP) • Environmental Information Management System • Regional Water Supply Plan for the Metropolitan Area 2.2.2 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency The MPCA administers several programs applicable to local storm water management planning. The MPCA monitors water quality, sets standards, and implements various controls. Following are two programs related to water quality. • The MPCA manages the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II permitting for small municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s) and construction and industrial discharge permitting • The MPCA implements the Clean Water Act, which requires that states adopt water quality standards to protect waters of the state. The EPA and MPCA require preparation of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies to identify the source of pollutants and plans for bringing the water resources into compliance. Lake Susan, Riley Lake, and Lotus Lake are impaired by excess nutrients; Bluff Creek is impaired by excess turbidity and does not meet state fish biology standards; and the Minnesota River does not meet turbidity standards. Several lakes and the Minnesota River do not meet mercury or PCB standards and have been listed on the MPCA’s 303(d) list of impaired waters. Section 3.2 discusses impaired waters in more detail. 2.2.3 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources The DNR manages and protects the state’s natural resources and operates numerous programs. The department provides technical assistance and information regarding best management practices, natural resource management, incorporating natural resource conservation in land use planning, and lakescaping. The Fisheries Division monitors and improves fisheries within the state. It also promotes fishing opportunities and provides grants to assist in the construction of fishing piers. The Ecological and Water Resources (EWR) Division focuses on an overarching vision of “Healthy Watersheds throughout Minnesota.” The EWR Division also provides the following services: • Maintains an inventory of public waters and operates permit programs for working in public waters or for appropriating public waters; • Oversees the state’s floodplain management program; • Provides local stewardship by coordinating the Mississippi River Critical Area and MNRAA programs and the Shoreland Management program; Page | 2-3 REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 • Collects, analyzes, and provides ecological information, including: ▪ Location and management of rare resources (endangered and threatened species, critical habitats, high quality natural communities); ▪ Management of harmful exotic species, fish and wildlife diseases, and negative environmental impacts of human development; ▪ Management and restoration of important ecological processes in river systems and key natural areas; and ▪ Development of information about Minnesota's ecosystems and their significance to a sustainable quality of life. The DNR’s webpage at http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/lakefind/index.html is LakeFinder, a DNR supported tool that combines information from various DNR Divisions, as well as other state agencies, such as Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (water quality) and Minnesota Department of Health (fish consumption). This tool contains data for more than 4,500 lakes and rivers throughout Minnesota. The DNR also provides a variety of specialized programs oriented to property owners or neighborhood groups, such as the Aquatic Plant Management, Urban Fisheries and Fishing in the Neighborhood, Neighborhood Wilds, and Metro Greenways programs. 2.2.4 Minnesota Department of Health The Environmental Health Division of the MDH administers numerous programs of interest to local water management planning, including the following. • Drinking water protection • Wellhead protection • Lake and fish monitoring (in partnership with DNR/MPCA) • Environmental Health Services • Health risk assessment, site assessment, and consultation • Well management The City worked with the MDH to develop a Wellhead Protection Plan (WHPP). 2.2.5 Carver County and Carver SWCD Carver County provides a variety of programs throughout the county that relate to water resources management. County staff manage feedlot and septic system programs, and undertake lake and stream monitoring for water quality where that is not undertaken by a WMO. The County also provides Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS) monitoring and works to stop their spread. Common carp, curlyleaf pondweed, Eurasian water milfoil, and zebra mussels have been found in some of the lakes in Chanhassen. The County has in place an approved groundwater plan, and offers financial assistance to property owners to properly seal unused or abandoned wells. The Carver Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) provides outreach and assistance to both urban and agricultural land owners to help them protect and improve lakes, streams, and wetlands in the county. The SWCD promotes environmentally-friendly landscaping, offers financial assistance for shoreline restorations and other Best Management Practices (BMPs), and sponsors student and adult education programming. Page | 2-4 REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 2.2.6 Watershed Districts and WMOs Watershed Management Organizations (WMOs) in the Metro area are required by statute to prepare and administer water management plans that establish watershed-wide goals, policies, and regulations. Local governments are also required by statute to prepare and administer local water management plans that establish local goals, policies, and regulations regarding those water resources management areas that are consistent with the watershed plans. Chanhassen has land within the boundaries of three watershed districts and one county WMO (see Figure 2.1): • Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District • Minnehaha Creek Watershed District • Lower Minnesota River Watershed District • Carver County WMO Minnehaha Creek WD Local Plan Requirements. The MCWD updated its Watershed Management Plan in 2017. The City of Chanhassen has land in the Lake Virginia, Christmas Lake and Lake Minnetonka subwatersheds. In addition to the general requirements for Local Management Plans set forth in Minnesota Rules 8410, additional items must be addressed in the city’s Local Plan. One focus of the MCWD plan is fostering collaboration between the District and the cities to achieve mutual water and natural resource management goals. To that end the local plan should include: • Locations of publicly-owned lands such as parkland, right of way, or public facilities that may provide opportunities for collaborative stormwater management BMPs. • Lands that may potentially develop or redevelop within the planning timeframe. • Planned Infrastructure improvements or parks or open space acquisitions. • Potential to use development and redevelopment regulation to create incentives to protect water and other natural resources, including controls on removing mature trees. • Ways in which the city’s development review process encourages low impact development, and how the City ensures BMPs are adequately maintained post-construction. • A description of how the City will proactively and at least annually communicate and coordinate with the District on implementation efforts and opportunities for collaboration. Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek WD Requirements. The Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Water Management Plan requires Local Water Plans (LWP) to meet the standards set forth in Minnesota Rules 8410. In addition, cities must submit an annual compliance report describing its annual achievements and progress towards meeting its goals. The LWP should also describe the self-evaluation process the city will use to assess whether those goals and actions should be revised. Lower Minnesota River WD Requirements. The Lower Minnesota River Third Water Management Plan requires Local Water Plans (LWP) to meet the standards set forth in Minnesota Rules 8410. The District will spot-check projects and programs for continued compliance with the approved LWP. Carver County WMO Requirements. The Carver County WMO Comprehensive Water Management Plan requires Local Water Plans (LWP) to meet the standards set forth in Minnesota Rules 8410. In addition, if the City desires to take on regulatory responsibility, the Plan should state so, and describe the local controls, policies, and procedures it will use to administer the permitting program, and demonstrate it has the technical capacity to do so. Page | 2-5 REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 Figure 2.1. Watershed Management Organizations in Chanhassen. Source: Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Districts. Page | 2-6 REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 2.3 WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT The primary permitting responsibilities for the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991 (WCA) will continue to rest with the City. Wetland LGU responsibilities include: • Review and approve wetland delineations and determinations • Review and approve wetland exemption / no-loss applications • Review and approve wetland replacement plan applications • Coordinate Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) meetings • Send Notices of Application and Decision to the TEP • Enforce wetland replacement monitoring requirements, review monitoring reports and certify replacement wetlands • Work with DNR and Carver County to enforce WCA violations 2.4 RELATIONSHIP TO NPDES STORMWATER PERMIT The City holds a permit from the MPCA to discharge stormwater into waters of the state through the MPCA’s NPDES General Stormwater Permit. The permit specifies that the City must develop, receive MPCA approval of, and implement a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that addresses a series of Best Management Practices (BMPs) for the following six minimum control measures established by the EPA: 1. Public education and outreach 2. Public participation/involvement 3. Illicit discharge detection and elimination 4. Construction site runoff control 5. Post-construction runoff control 6. Pollution prevention/good housekeeping during municipal operations The City’s previous SWPPP was approved in 2003 and amended in 2006. The State of Minnesota adopted a new NPDES General Stormwater Permit effective August 1, 2013, and the City submitted a permit reapplication in December 2013. Approval of the new permit and SWPPP was received in 2014. Activities and policies to be included in the SWPPP are prescribed in the General Permit, and include many of the actions and policies set forth in this LWMP. 2.5 WATER RESOURCE RELATED AGREEMENTS Water resource-related agreements, including Joint Powers Agreements, are typically struck between agencies or entities with overlapping regulatory interests or geographic similarities. The City has the following agreements: • Memorandum of Agreement Between Carver County Land and Water Services and the City of Chanhassen Regarding Water Quality Education (MS4 Requirements), AIS and Targeted Monitoring Within City Boundaries. • Agreement Between the Carver Soil and Water Conservation District and the City of Chanhassen Relating to Urban Development Review and Site Inspection Services; Wetland Conservation Act; Individual Homeowner Natural Resource Issues. Page | 3-1 REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 3.0 Assessment of Problems 3.1 HYDROLOGIC MODELING As part of this Plan, the HydroCAD hydrologic and hydraulic models for the city were updated to include the most recent watershed and basin information. There are fifteen individual HydroCAD models for the City. Issues raised by these models are discussed in Appendix A in the Subwatershed Summaries. The purpose of performing this modeling is for planning level assessments. The models were not calibrated to actual runoff and flows, and are not intended to be flood studies. The models were executed for the 100-year Atlas 14 precipitation event. Model output is quite lengthy and is available electronically. The output files are incorporated into this Plan as Appendix B. 3.1.1 Areas of Known Flooding On June 19, 2014, 4.98 inches of rain fell in less than 24 hours at the National Weather Service monitoring site in Chanhassen, a nearly 25-year return interval event. Almost 4.5 inches of rain had fallen in the weeks preceding this storm event, and the ground was saturated and ponds and wetlands were still full. Localized flooding occurred at a number of locations. These included both ongoing problem areas as well as locations where no or minimal flooding had been observed before: • Market Boulevard north of MN T.H. 5 • Pipewood Curve • Kerber Boulevard between Saddlebrook Curve and Sierra Trail • Lake Riley Boulevard at Lyman Boulevard 3.2 IMPAIRED WATERS Waters that do not meet state water quality standards are listed as “Impaired” by the State of Minnesota will require additional analysis in the form of a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) study. A TMDL is the maximum amount of a pollutant a waterbody can receive and still meet water quality standards. The TMDL study identifies the sources and magnitude of pollutant loading and establishes a numeric load reduction that must be made for each source. Table 3.1. Impaired Waters in Chanhassen. Lake/Stream DNR Lake # /Reach # Affected Use Pollutant Minnewashta 10-0009 Aquatic consumption Mercury FT1 Lucy 10-0007 Aquatic consumption Mercury FT1 Ann 10-0012 Aquatic consumption Mercury FT1 Susan 10-0013 Aquatic consumption/Aquatic recreation Mercury FT1 and Excess Nutrients Christmas 27-0137 Aquatic consumption Mercury FT1 Lotus 10-0006 Aquatic consumption/Aquatic recreation Mercury FT1 and Excess Nutrients Riley 10-0002 Aquatic consumption/Aquatic recreation Mercury FT1 and Excess Nutrients Bluff Creek 07020012-710 Aquatic life Fish IBI2, Turbidity Minnesota River 07020012-506 Aquatic consumption/Aquatic life Mercury FT1, Mercury WC1, PCB FT1, Turbidity 1 "FT" means mercury or PCBs in fish tissue while “WC” means in the water column. 2 Index of Biotic Integrity. A measure of the quantity and quality of aquatic life. Source: MPCA 2016 draft 303(d) list of impaired waters. Page | 3-2 REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 3.3 TMDLS AND UAAS A TMDL was completed and approved in 2013 for the Bluff Creek biotic integrity and turbidity impairments. A statewide TMDL has been completed for the mercury impairments. The Riley-Purgatory- Bluff Creek Watershed District has completed Use Attainability Analyses (UAAs) for Lake Susan, Lake Lucy, and Lake Ann. The UAAs are scientific assessments of a water body’s physical, chemical, and biological condition. The studies include water quality assessments and recommendations for protective and/or remedial measures for the studied lakes and their directly tributary watersheds. The results of these UAAs provide the City guidelines for water resource improvement projects for these water bodies. Although the UAAs provide some background data that may be used towards preparation of a TMDL they do not meet MPCA criteria for a TMDL document. 3.3.1 Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Studies Bluff Creek Turbidity and Fish Biota TMDL. Bluff Creek is listed by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) as impaired for aquatic life use due to excess turbidity levels and low fish biota scores. The Turbidity and Fish Biota TMDL was approved in 2013. The Bluff Creek TMDL Biological Stressor Identification Report identified sediment, metals, habitat fragmentation, and flow as stressors to fish biota. Although the TMDL Report discusses all of these stressors, Wasteload Allocations (WLAs) were made only for total suspended solids (TSS), which represents a surrogate for both turbidity and fish biota. Chanhassen’s TSS Wasteload Allocation requires an 88 percent reduction in TSS contributed to the stream. Primary sources of sediment are stream bank and bluff erosion, as well as poorly vegetated ravines and gullies. An inventory and assessment of the Bluff Creek lower valley was completed to identify sites contributing excessive amounts of sediment to Bluff Creek and to determine feasible options for addressing sources of excess sediment delivery to the stream. Five sites were classified as Severe and are highest priority for stabilization and restoration, as was the stream just below the Hennepin County Regional Trail Corridor culvert crossing. The stream channel has downcut significantly below that culvert, and the culvert is being undermined, which could lead to future failure. This large drop also disrupts the connectivity of the creek, fragmenting habitat. Fish and other aquatic organisms are not able to migrate upstream of the culvert. Correction of the severe erosion and addition of a fish passage to reconnect the creek above and below the culvert were identified as priority implementation projects. South Metro Mississippi Total Suspended Solids TMDL. The South Metro Mississippi TSS TMDL was approved in 2016. This TMDL would require a 25 percent reduction in TSS load from MS4 communities such as Chanhassen. MS4s can demonstrate they meet this reduction by implementing a suite of BMPs that the MPCA will develop, or by showing that pollutant loads from their community meet or are less than the target load of 154 lbs/acre/year. This proof can be accomplished through water quality monitoring or modeling. Twin Cities Metropolitan Chloride TMDL. This study includes TMDLs for 37 of the 39 lakes and streams in the Metro Area that are impaired by excess chloride levels. The report also identifies high-risk waterbodies where monitoring data indicates that resource is approaching the impairment threshold. There are no chloride-impaired waters in Chanhassen, but the City is located within the tributary area of Minnehaha Creek, which is impaired by excess chloride. In addition, Bluff Creek has been classified as a high-risk waterbody. No specific load reductions were identified for Bluff Creek or any other waterbody Page | 3-3 REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 in Chanhassen, but the TMDL suggests that all cities where high-risk resources are located consider developing a chloride management plan for those lakes and streams. In general, the TMDL suggests that regardless of whether or not runoff drains to an impaired or high-risk waterbody road authorities and other regulated entities take proactive steps to reduce the application of road salt for winter ice control as much as possible without compromising public safety. 3.3.2 UAAs The three UAAs were updated in 2013. Short descriptions of findings are provided below. More detail can be found in the Lake Susan Use Attainability Assessment Update (Wenck 2013) and the Lake Lucy and Lake Ann Use Attainability Assessment Update (Barr 2013) available from the Watershed District (http://www.rpbcwd.org/resources/). Lake Susan. Lake Susan is a shallow, 88 acre lake. Nearly all the surface area is less than 15 feet deep, shallow enough to be almost entirely dominated by rooted aquatic vegetation. Water quality is variable, some years approaching state water quality standards for shallow lakes and some years worse, but on average, the lake does not meet those standards. The Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Management Plan classified Lake Susan as a deep lake, and water quality falls short of deep lake goals. Invasive aquatic vegetation has been an issue in Lake Susan for many years. Curly-leaf pondweed and Eurasian watermilfoil present the greatest threat to the lake. The University of Minnesota has been working to manage the rough fish population in the lake while also trying to reestablish native aquatic vegetation. Modeling completed for the UAA update estimated the amount of nutrient loading from the watershed and from internal and other sources. The North subwatershed, where there are developed areas with little or no water quality treatment, is the largest source of load to the lake. In the South subwatershed, a large wetland in Lake Susan Hills West Park is a likely exporter of phosphorus. Lake Susan also experiences high sediment loading. Total Phosphorus (TP) load to Lake Susan needs to be reduced by 182 pounds per year, or about 25 percent, to meet the shallow lake standard. The UAA identified some pond enhancements and a restoration of the identified wetland in Lake Susan Hills Park followed by a lake alum treatment to seal bottom sediments as potential actions to achieve that goal. Lake Lucy and Lake Ann. Water quality in Lake Lucy and Lake Ann has been fairly stable—neither degrading nor improving—in recent years. Lake Lucy currently meets the MPCA shallow lake water quality standards; however, excess phosphorus results in algal blooms and reduced water clarity that does not meet the RPBCWD’s goals. The annual phosphorus loading to Lake Lucy, based on the 2012 water year, indicates nearly half of the phosphorus load to the lake is from watershed runoff. Since the watershed to Lake Lucy has many ponds and wetlands that settle out particulates, much of the phosphorus that reaches Lake Lucy is in the soluble, or non-settleable, form that is readily available for algal uptake. The other primary contributions of phosphorus are internal sources, including release from the bottom sediments and from the dieback of Curlyleaf pondweed. While Lake Ann is currently meeting both the RPBCWD and MPCA water quality goals, the release of phosphorus from the lake sediments appears to lead to periodic blue-green algal blooms suspended below the water surface. During the 2012 water year, more than half of the phosphorus load to Lake Ann came from internal sources, primarily the release from the bottom sediments. Approximately Page | 3-4 REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 30 percent of the phosphorus load was from the Lake Ann watershed and discharge from Lake Lucy. Because the lakes currently meet state water quality standards, no specific phosphorus load reductions have been identified. However, to meet Watershed District goals, improve water clarity, and reduce the incidence and severity of algal blooming, the UAA identified a number of management actions. These include: implementing stormwater volume abstraction rules as portions of the watershed develop or redevelop; maximizing the treatment of watershed runoff such as iron-enhanced sand filter pond benches or the use of spent lime treatments to remove soluble phosphorus; and curly-leaf pondweed treatment in Lake Lucy and a whole-lake alum treatment in Lake Ann to help control internal phosphorus load. 3.4 PROBLEMS AND ISSUES Local water management problems, issues, and opportunities were identified by reviewing: • Statutory requirements for Local Water Management Plans • Lake inventory data • Lake UAAs and stream TMDLs • Input solicited from the public, the Environmental Commission, City staff, and state and local agency staff Once the problems and issues were identified staff identified and prioritized potential solutions to help the City of Chanhassen accomplish the goals of this Plan. This section presents those items evaluated to develop the proposed improvements and management studies summarized in the Implementation Plan. Table 3.2. Problems, issues, and opportunities. Water Quality Conditions • Lakes and streams are listed on the Clean Water Act Section 303(d) TMDL List of Impaired Waters. • Nonpoint source pollution reduction is necessary through maintenance practices such as street sweeping, sump manhole cleaning, and pond inspections. Drainage and Flooding • Near stream gullies and escarpments should be addressed to control sediment deposition into surface waters and to protect property and infrastructure. • Subsurface drainage causing icing on public streets and pedestrian pathways. Regulatory Requirements and Operational Policies • Atlas 14 updated precipitation frequency data is available for adoption. • Approaches such as Minimal Impact Development and Integrated Management Practices are available to reduce the public expenditures necessary to control runoff and protect and improve water quality. • The City’s approved NPDES permit and SWPPP requires ordinance revisions and operating program enhancements. • City goals, policies and ordinances to help protect natural resources may need review and refinement. Water-Based Recreation Needs • Water quality should be protected and improved to protect and enhance recreational opportunities. • Control of aquatic invasive species (AIS) is of growing concern. Maintenance Requirements • BMP maintenance and repair requirements have been identified during NPDES inspections, including restoration of storage capacity, repair of erosion, and prevention of future problems. • Street sweeping, sump manhole cleaning, and BMP inspections are necessary on an ongoing basis to help reduce nonpoint source pollutant loads. Page | 3-5 REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 Education and Outreach • Education and outreach efforts could be expanded with a focus on targeted groups with new and expanded educational opportunities. Financial Resources • Financial resources are limited, requiring that projects be prioritized. Groundwater Protection • The LWMP should be coordinated with the Wellhead Protection Program so that policies that encourage infiltration and groundwater recharge are consistent with the policies to protect sensitive areas and groundwater supply recharge areas. • Seminary Fen is a rare calcareous fen and Assumption Creek is a trout stream, both of which are dependent on groundwater. Collaboration Opportunities • There are opportunities for collaboration with other agencies such as the WMOs, the county, and state agencies to leverage expertise and resources to finance and construct improvements. Page | 4-1 REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 4.0 Goals and Policies This section of the Plan outlines goals and policies guiding surface water management in the City of Chanhassen. A goal is a desired end toward which surface water management efforts are directed. Each goal has several corresponding policies that form the governing principals that will be followed to achieve the goals. Table 4.1 summarizes the six water resources management goals. The six goals and the corresponding policies are presented and discussed in more detail in the following pages. Table 4.1. Water resources management goals. Goal Number Goal Area Goal Statement 1 Water Quantity Promote abstraction through infiltration, reuse and other methods where practicable to do so to provide flood protection, ground water recharge and improved water quality. 2 Water Quality Achieve water quality standards in lakes, streams, and wetlands consistent with their designated uses and established classifications. 3 Wetlands Protect and rehabilitate wetlands to maintain or improve their function and value. 4 Groundwater Prevent contamination of the aquifers and promote groundwater recharge to maintain base flows in streams and wetlands. 5 Regulatory Responsibility Maintain primary responsibility for managing water resources at the local level where efficient to do so but continue coordination and cooperation with other agencies and organizations. 6 Public Education and Participation Cultivate an environmentally literate public to promote an active community role in sustainable management of water resources. 4.1 GOALS AND POLICIES Water Quantity Development and changes in land use that result in additional impervious surface will result in a corresponding increase in stormwater runoff rates and volumes. This increase can cause flooding and erosion issues in the downstream system. It is important to control these increased runoff rates and volumes in order to ensure reduction of flooding in the downstream system and to control the potential effects of erosive flows on streams and waterways. Storm sewer design within the City of Chanhassen has been largely based upon the precipitation frequency estimates published in the Weather Bureau’s Technical Paper Number 40 (“TP 40”), Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States for Durations from 30 Minutes to 24 Hours and Return Periods from 1 to 100 years (Hershfield 1961). In April 2013 the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) published Atlas 14, Precipitation – Frequency Atlas of the United States, Volume 8 Version 2.0 to replace TP40. Atlas 14 used a much more robust data set over a much longer time span then was used for TP 40. While the 2-year average return interval and the 10-year average return interval remained relatively unchanged, the 100-year amount increased by 1.38 inches or 23% over the previous estimate Page | 4-2 REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 (Table 4.2). The longer period of record used in developing Atlas 40 allowed for a more statistically accurate estimate of the less frequent events. Table 4.2. Comparison of TP-40 to Atlas 14 event depths. Publication 2-Year, 24 Hour 10-Year, 24 Hour 100-Year, 24 Hour TP 40 2.8” 4.2” 6.0” Atlas 14 2.87” 4.27” 7.38” Even though we now know to design to greater depths for certain events the City’s infrastructure has generally performed very well. However, there have been a few instances where the existing infrastructure was inadequate to accommodate the runoff volumes and/or rates. The City experienced large storm events in 2005, 2009, and 2014. The first 2005 large event occurred on September 3 and 4 and totaled approximately 5.55 inches of rainfall. The second occurred on October 4 and 5, 2005, and totaled approximately 4.61 inches of rainfall. From June 19 through June 20, 2014 the Chanhassen area received approximately 6.23 inches of rainfall. That June Chanhassen received 12.79 inches of rainfall after a wetter than average April and May. While significant damages did not occur from these events, a few areas were subject to high water levels and short-term flooding of streets. Lotus Lake, Lake Riley and Lake Minnewashta all experienced extended high water levels. Residents on these lakes experienced submerged docks and some shoreline erosion damage. Users were subject to the City’s emergency slow/no-wake restrictions for a period of about 15 days. Looking at opportunities to reduce the extent and/or duration of these high water levels is one of the key water quantity issues for the City. Because the lake discharges to Purgatory Creek, the solution is not a simple one. Coordination with RPBCWD, Lotus Lake area residents and the potentially impacted property owners downstream will be a critical step in developing a long term solution that does not push the problem downstream. Another issue that was discovered during the large event of 2005 is the lack of emergency overflows and flow paths in some areas of the City. Ultimately, the City’s focus is to operate and maintain the system so that it continues to function in the way it is intended, and provides flood protection for adjacent properties. During review of storm water management plans it is important for City staff to review the location of emergency overflow paths for storm water infrastructure in new developments. In recent years there has been a paradigm shift in water quantity management. The strategy today is to where possible manage stormwater where it falls, as exemplified by the State of Minnesota’s Minimal Impact Design Standards (MIDS). The emphasis is on reducing the volume of runoff discharged to downstream resources through abstraction, or the permanent retention of runoff on a site through structures and practices such as infiltration, evapotranspiration and capture and reuse. This abstraction can help mitigate the effects of larger storm events. Abstraction has other benefits as well, including minimizing and reducing the amount of pollution reaching our lakes, rivers and streams and recharging groundwater resources. A Flood Hazard Boundary Map dated January 1979 was completed for the City of Chanhassen, which identifies the entire City as a No Special Flood Hazard Area or Zone C. The Flood Insurance Study for Carver County is being updated as part of the FEMA Map Modernization Program. Updated maps are expected to be published in 2018. Maps are available from the FEMA website, www.fema.gov, available at City Hall or from the respective WMO. Page | 4-3 REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 Goal 1. Promote abstraction through infiltration, reuse and other methods where practicable to do so to provide flood protection, ground water recharge and improved water quality. Policy 1.1. Require all developments to construct stormwater best management practices, improve existing practices, and/or contribute to the construction or improvement of a regional facility for the purpose of reducing peak flows and runoff volume generated by the subject development. Policy 1.2. Require all development and redevelopment projects to demonstrate no net increase in the annual runoff water volume discharged from the site compared to pre-development conditions. Policy 1.3. Creative and innovative site design and Best Management Practices, including infiltration systems and stormwater reuse, will be the preferred practice unless site limitations such as soil conditions, depth to groundwater, and safety preclude the use of these practices. Policy 1.4. Continue to stringently enforce impervious surface requirements set forth in City Code and development contracts. Policy 1.5. Establish and maintain overflow routes for ponds and low areas to provide relief during storm conditions that exceed design conditions. Policy 1.6. Where volume reduction is infeasible and detention ponds are necessary, regional ponding areas, as opposed to individual on-site ponds, should be used to reduce flooding, to control discharge rates, and to provide necessary storage volumes as indicated in this Plan. Policy 1.7. When areas are developed, redeveloped, and as infrastructure is replaced, stormwater facilities should be built and/or upgraded to provide or improve flood management and water quality. Policy 1.8. Encourage the development of new and improvement of existing ponds located upstream of priority water bodies. Policy 1.9. Permanently protect surface water impoundments and drainage systems by requiring the dedication of land and/or protective easements as required. Policy 1.10. Design, operate and maintain newly constructed storm water facilities in accordance with this Plan. Policy 1.11. Manage floodplain activities in accordance with all City, state, and federal regulations. Policy 1.12. Require building elevations to provide at least 3 feet of freeboard adjacent to ponding areas and floodplains as an area develops or when drainage facilities are constructed for an area. Policy 1.13. Preserve existing water storage below 100-year flood elevations. Policy 1.14. Continue management and development of public and private stormwater infrastructure as separate systems. Policy 1.15. Require development and redevelopment stormwater management incorporate the protection of existing and native plant and forest communities to meet regulatory requirements. Page | 4-4 REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 Water Quality The City of Chanhassen seeks to maintain and improve the water quality in its lakes, streams and wetlands to meet or better the State of Minnesota surface water quality standards for lakes and streams. There are many potential sources of water pollution that can negatively impact public safety and the enjoyment of these resources. Stormwater runoff can convey phosphorus, chloride, sediment, oils, debris, and bacteria to downstream waters, increasing algal blooms, reducing water clarity, and impacting fish and other aquatic communities. Excessive volumes and rates of stormwater runoff discharged into channels and streams can erode streambanks, causing additional water quality impacts. One of the City’s chief strategies for achieving its water quality goals is to require development and redevelopment to provide stormwater quality treatment through abstraction of 1.1 inch of runoff from impervious surfaces, or if that is infeasible, to provide treatment by some other means. Other strategies include better management of construction site erosion control measures, reducing the level of impervious cover, reducing the extent of managed lawn areas and replacing them with native vegetation, reducing stream bank erosion, and practicing good housekeeping practices, such as removing leaves from streets and storm drains and limiting the use of phosphorus fertilizers. Goal 2. Achieve water quality standards in lakes, streams, and wetlands consistent with their designated uses and established classifications. Policy 2.1. Manage each water body in the City’s surface water system to meet state, local, and federal water quality standards. Policy 2.2. Require that development and redevelopment projects demonstrate no net increase in the annual mass of total suspended solids (TSS), total phosphorous (TP) from the site compared to pre-development conditions. Policy 2.3. Require owners of development or redevelopment projects to provide on-site volume reduction or treatment or, where volume reduction is infeasible, contribute to the construction or improvement of a regional facility. Policy 2.4. Establish and implement on-going programs for property owners, local leaders, and those who live, work and play in the city designed to promote active stewardship of water resources. Develop and maintain a public education program to promote reduction of nutrient and sediment loading to water bodies. Policy 2.5. Continue to monitor long-term water quality trends on prioritized water bodies. Policy 2.6. Develop and implement a priority ranking scheme to focus management activities and capital improvements. Update priorities annually with a 5 year horizon. Policy 2.7. Evaluate the progress of the surface water management program on an annual basis in conjunction with the NPDES MS4 annual report. Policy 2.8. The City may require higher water quality standards in areas draining to an Impaired or Special Water. Policy 2.9. The City will lead by example by following the standards of this Plan and implementing BMPs to provide pollution prevention and water quality treatment on City-initiated projects. Policy 2.10 Require the use of low impact design techniques such as Mimimal Impact Design Standards (MIDS) during development review to meet infiltration and reduce pollutant and nutrient loading to water resources where feasible. Page | 4-5 REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 Policy 2.10. Prohibit the discharge of foreign material into the storm water system. Such material should include, but not be limited to, waste oil, paint, grass clippings, leaves, commercial fertilizers, trash, construction debris, and miscellaneous chemicals. Policy 2.11. Continue implementing a spill response program for the City personnel to prevent discharge of spilled materials into the storm sewer system. Policy 2.12. Continue to implement the erosion and sediment control policies and the construction site inspection program to ensure reduction of water quality impacts from lack of erosion and sediment control. Wetlands The City of Chanhassen serves as the Local Government Unit (LGU) for the purposes of administering the State of Minnesota’s Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). The City’s Wetland Protection Ordinance sets forth standards for the protection of wetlands, including wetland buffers, setbacks, and mitigation of unavoidable impacts. The policies and strategies set forth in this Plan will apply to new development and redevelopment projects proposed within the City. Any wetland habitat on property to be developed will be subject to these management policies, as well as the rules and requirements of the Wetland Conservation Act. Goal 3. Protect and rehabilitate wetlands to maintain or improve their function and value. Policy 3.1. Continue to act as the responsible Local Government Unit (LGU) for administration of the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) for wetland impacts in the City. Policy 3.2. Maintain an official wetlands map that classifies wetlands by function and value and periodically update the wetland inventory data and the wetland management classifications. Policy 3.3. Update the City’s Wetland Protection Ordinance as necessary to maintain consistency with state and watershed district requirements. Policy 3.4. Promote stewardship of wetlands on private property Policy 3.5. Improve historic wetlands through pre-treatment and restoration activates when practical to do so, and in conjunction with street improvement and redevelopment projects Groundwater The City’s role in managing groundwater resources is limited in scope. There are actions the City can take to prevent or minimize impacts to groundwater quality. Groundwater and surface waters interact, and streams and wetlands and to a lesser extent lakes are reliant on groundwater contributions to maintain stream baseflow and wetland hydrology. The City’s primary strategies in groundwater management are to encourage infiltration of stormwater to help recharge surficial groundwater and to encourage water reuse and conservation to reduce consumption and protect the water supply. Page | 4-6 REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 Goal 4. Prevent contamination of the aquifers and promote groundwater recharge to maintain base flows in streams and wetlands. Policy 4.1. Continue implementation of the City of Chanhassen Wellhead Protection Plan. Policy 4.2. Cooperate with the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH), Carver County, the Department of Natural Resources, and other agencies to periodically assess the vulnerability of groundwater used for drinking water supplies. Policy 4.3. Promote infiltration of stormwater and resulting groundwater recharge where it is feasible and does not pose a threat to groundwater quality, in accordance with the Minnesota Department of Health’s Evaluating Proposed Storm Water Infiltration Projects in Vulnerable Wellhead Protection Areas. Policy 4.4. Promote proper well abandonment. Regulatory Responsibility The City assumes the role of permitting all land alteration activities summarized in table 4.3 and enforcing the standards and policies set forth by the Plan. Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD) also reviews and permits on any proposed land alteration under their rules within the RPBCWD. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) permits for projects that include land alteration, floodplain alteration, dredging, shoreline and streambank improvement, and stream and lake crossings. Lower Minnesota River Watershed District reviews alterations to land within the Minnesota River valley. Carver County Water Management Organization reviews land altering projects in the WMO. The City is the LGU for the Wetland Conservation Act, and assumes the role of permitting all wetland impacts. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has authority over issues relating to water and wetlands designated as State Protected Wetlands and Waters. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has authority relating to all wetlands identified by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s National Wetland Inventory. Carver County and the Minnesota Department of Health have regulatory authority over groundwater issues within the City. Erosion control falls under several jurisdictions including the City, the watershed districts, and the MPCA. The MPCA also has regulatory authority over individual septic systems within the City limits. Table 4.3. Agencies with regulatory authority. Rule Chanhassen CCWMO LMnRWD MCWD RPBCWD Dredging And Sediment Removal No No NA Yes Yes Erosion Prevention & Sediment Control Yes MOU NA MOU Yes Floodplain Management Yes MOU NA Yes Yes Shoreline & Streambank Stabilization No No NA Yes Yes Stormwater Management Yes MOU NA MOU Yes Water Appropriations No No NA No Yes Waterbody Crossings No No NA Yes Yes Wetland & Stream Buffers Yes Yes NA MOU Yes MOU = Memorandum of Understanding Page | 4-7 REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 Goal 5. Maintain primary responsibility for managing water resources at the local level where efficient to do so but continue coordination and cooperation with other agencies and organizations. Policy 5.1. Adopt policies consistent with the most stringent local watershed authorities’ management plans to the extent practicable. Policy 5.2. Enter into memorandum of understanding where maintaining consistency with local watershed authorities’ plans would otherwise be counter to City’s overall goals. Policy 5.3. This plan and all subsequent amendments will be consistent with the plans of regulatory agencies. Policy 5.4. This plan will be amended as necessary to remain current. Policy 5.5. Coordinate projects and information with government agencies; i.e. MnDOT, Carver and Hennepin Counties, Department of Natural Resources, Watershed Districts, and Water Management Organizations. Public Education and Participation The public education and participation goals and policies recognize that people want to be involved in decisions that affect the water resources in their community. The City seeks to create opportunities for the public to participate in information gathering and decision-making. Public education and participation activities are also requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit. Goal 6. Cultivate an environmentally literate public to promote an active community role in sustainable management of water resources. Policy 6.1. The City will continue to provide opportunities for public involvement (e.g., neighborhood meetings, public hearings, mailed notices, etc.) for significant water resource decisions or projects. Policy 6.2. The City will coordinate and consult with appropriate City commissions and committees on surface water issues. Policy 6.3. The City will communicate with lake associations and other appropriate civic and citizen groups. Policy 6.4. The City will actively implement the current educational programs and work to develop and implement new education programs and activities related to water resources. Policy 6.5. The City will cooperate with other agencies and encourage establishment of model interpretative sites for public education like the stormwater practices at the Landscape Arboretum. Policy 6.6. Continue to remain in compliance with the NPDES Phase II MS4 permit with respect to public education and involvement. Page | 5-1 REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 5.0 Implementation Plan The City of Chanhassen will implement both management programs and capital projects to achieve the goals and policies set forth in this Plan. These actions address the problems and issues identified here as well as NPDES and TMDL requirements and agency and watershed expectations. The following sections describe those actions, which as summarized in Tables 5.2 and 5.3. Each year the City will review progress and resources, and these implementation actions may be reviewed and updated based on changing conditions or requirements. If necessary, this Plan may be amended in accordance with the procedure set forth in Section 6.0. 5.1 PERMITTING AND ENFORCEMENT Numerous local, state, and federal agencies regulate water resources. However, the primary regulators are the City of Chanhassen; the four watershed management organizations within Chanhassen; the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MDNR); and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). These regulations are discussed in Section 2.0 Regulatory Framework. 5.1.1 Current Ordinances and Potential Revisions The City of Chanhassen has enacted numerous policies and ordinances regulating and managing water resources. These are described in Section 2.1 above. In its NPDES stormwater permit application, the City agreed to within one year or permit approval adopt ordinance revisions as necessary to meet permit requirements. Additional regulatory revisions are necessary to bring the ordinances into conformance with the requirements of the watershed district in the city (Table 5.1). The city will undertake these ordinance revisions within six months after adoption of this Plan. It is expected that where the requirements of the individual watershed distracts differ, the City will adopt the most stringent of the requirements for application citywide. The most stringent requirements the City will adopt are highlighted in Table 5.1. In 2018 the City will implement a new water resource permit and process for development and redevelopment to administer permit requirements. The City intends to continue to permit development and redevelopment projects requiring stormwater, wetland, floodplain, or erosion control review and approval, and will work with the WMOs to modify the existing Memoranda of Understanding or adopt a new MOU. The city will also work with the WMOs as it considers regulatory revisions to ensure that they are consistent with WMO requirements. It is the City’s desire to reduce administrative and regulatory burden while staying protective of our water and natural resources. Page | 5-2 REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 Table 5.1. Regulatory requirements of various agencies compared to Chanhassen current ordinances. Note: Highlight indicates the standards the City expects to adopt following approval of the Plan. Standard Chanhassen NPDES General Permit NPDES Construction Permit Carver County WMO Plan: October 26, 2010 Rules: 10/15/16 Riley- Purgatory –Bluff Cr WD Plan: January 26, 2011 Rules: Effective 1/1/15 Lower Minnesota River WD Plan: December 14, 2011 Rules: Cities; new standards pending 9/17 Minnehaha Creek WD Plan: July 5, 2007 Rules: 6/6/14 Threshold: single family residential new development N/A Disturb >1 acre of land, or part of common development >1 acre Disturb >1 acre of land, or part of common development >1 acre Create 1> impervious or >10,000 sf in sensitive areas a. Land-disturbing activities that will disturb 50 cubic yards or more of earth; b. Land-disturbing activities that will disturb 5,000 square feet or more of surface area or vegetation; or c. Subdivision of a parcel into three or more residential lots. Disturb >1 acre of land Pending Draft: within the HVRA Overlay, create >10,000 sq ft new impervious area ≥1 acre where more than 20% of site is or will be impervious Threshold: non-residential new development N/A Disturb >1 acre of land, or part of common development >1 acre Disturb >1 acre of land, or part of common development >1 acre Create 1> impervious or >10,000 sf in sensitive areas a. Land-disturbing activities that will disturb 50 cubic yards or more of earth; b. Land-disturbing activities that will disturb 5,000 square feet or more of surface area or vegetation Disturb >1 acre of land Pending Draft: within the HVRA Overlay, create >10,000 sq ft new impervious area ≥1 acre where more than 20% of site is or will be impervious Threshold: single family residential redevelopment N/A Disturb >1 acre of land, or part of common development >1 acre Disturb >1 acre of land, or part of common development >1 acre Additions: Create >1 acre impervious or >10,000 sf in sensitive areas, for new impervious Tear downs: Create >1 acre impervious or >10,000 sf in sensitive areas, for all impervious created by project; Redevelopments that reduce imperviousness by 10% are exempt from rate, volume, and WQ reqs Same as above, except where redevelopment of more than 50% of site or that increases impervious by more than 50%, applies to entire site; less than 50% of site, applies only to disturbed area/new impervious Disturb >1 acre of land Pending Draft: within the HVRA Overlay, create >10,000 sq ft new impervious area ≤1 acre; requirements vary by size, change in imperviousness, and % disturbance Threshold: non-residential redevelopment N/A Disturb >1 acre of land, or part of common development >1 acre Disturb >1 acre of land, or part of common development >1 acre Additions: Create >1 acre impervious or >10,000 sf in sensitive areas, for new impervious Tear downs: Create >1 acre impervious or >10,000 sf in sensitive areas, for all impervious created by project; Redevelopments that reduce imperviousness by 10% are exempt from rate, volume, and WQ reqs Same as above, except where redevelopment of more than 50% of site or that increases impervious by more than 50%, applies to entire site; less than 50% of site, applies only to disturbed area/new impervious Disturb >1 acre of land Pending Draft: within the HVRA Overlay, create >10,000 sq ft new impervious area >1 acre; requirements vary of < or > 40% site disturbance Page | 5-3 REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 Standard Chanhassen NPDES General Permit NPDES Construction Permit Carver County WMO Plan: October 26, 2010 Rules: 10/15/16 Riley- Purgatory –Bluff Cr WD Plan: January 26, 2011 Rules: Effective 1/1/15 Lower Minnesota River WD Plan: December 14, 2011 Rules: Cities; new standards pending 9/17 Minnehaha Creek WD Plan: July 5, 2007 Rules: 6/6/14 Threshold: grading and erosion control Disturb>5,000 sf, excavate or place >50 cy fill, any disturbance on “highly erodible” land or land in the Bluff Creek Overlay District, or with any earthwork permit Disturb >1 acre of land, or part of common development >1 acre Disturb >1 acre of land, or part of common development >1 acre >1 acre construction activity; <1 acres in sensitive areas or part of common development a. Land-disturbing activities that will disturb 50 cubic yards or more of earth, b. Land-disturbing activities that will disturb 5,000 square feet or more of surface area or vegetation As required by the General Permit for Construction Pending Draft: Disturb >1 acre of land, or within the HVRA Overlay District, disturb more than 5,000 sq feet or disturb 50 cubic yards or more of earth, All land disturbing activity except agriculture and disturbances of less than 5,000 sq ft moving less than 50 cu yd Water quality: new development Whichever is most restrictive: meet NPDES construction permit; NURP criteria (90% TSS and 60% TP; or special requirements for discharges to “Preserve” waters No net increase in TP or TSS annual load Wet pond with 1,800 cu ft dead storage per contributing acre and live storage of 1” of runoff from new impervious surface 90% removal of TP and TSS from the 1.05” event Provide for at least 60% removal of TP and 90% removal of TSS from all runoff from site Treatment as required by the General Permit for Construction; NURP pond designs apply Draft pending: No net increase in TP or TSS. Within HVRA 60% decrease in TP and 80% TSS from predevelopment condition No net increase in TP, except where land use was row crop/feedlot, must be modeled as if meadow Water quality: redevelopment Whichever is most restrictive: meet NPDES construction permit; NURP criteria (90% TSS and 60% TP; or special requirements for discharges to “Preserve” waters Decrease in TP and TSS annual load Wet pond with 1,800 cu ft dead storage per contributing acre and live storage of 1” of runoff from new impervious surface 90% removal of TP and TSS from the 1.0” event Provide for at least 60% removal of TP and 90% removal of TSS from all runoff from site Treatment as required by the General Permit for Construction; NURP pond designs apply Draft pending: No net increase in TP or TSS. Within HVRA decrease in TP and TSS from predevelopment condition Varies based on size and whether impervious is increased or decreased Rate control No increase over 1- or 2-, 10-, and 100-year rates No specific requirement No more than 5.66 cfs per acre pond surface area No increase over 2-, 10-, and 100-year rates and 10-day snowmelt; Extended detention for sites discharging directly to streams: 50% reduction of 2- year discharge from existing No increase over 2-, 10-, and 100-year Atlas 14 Nested Distribution rates No increase over 1-or 2-, 10-, or 100-year rates Pending draft: using Atlas 14 Nested Distribution rates No increase over 1-, 10-, and 100-year rates, except where land use was row crop/feedlot, must be modeled as if meadow Infiltration: new development Discharging to special waters: Infiltration of excess volume over pre-development volume, up to 2-yr, 24-hour event Any grading permit: Soil amendment ripped into existing soil materials to a depth of ten inches on the site No net increase in annual runoff volume If more than 1 acre of new impervious, infiltrate/abstract 1” from new impervious surface Abstraction of 1.0” runoff from impervious surface 1.1” abstraction from all impervious surface 0.5” runoff from new impervious surface Pending Draft: sites that create >1 acre new impervious abstract 1” from all impervious. Within HVRA, sites that create >10,000 sf new impervious abstract 1.1” 1” from impervious surface. Where 1” infeasible, must do at least 0.5” plus additional TP reduction Page | 5-4 REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 Standard Chanhassen NPDES General Permit NPDES Construction Permit Carver County WMO Plan: October 26, 2010 Rules: 10/15/16 Riley- Purgatory –Bluff Cr WD Plan: January 26, 2011 Rules: Effective 1/1/15 Lower Minnesota River WD Plan: December 14, 2011 Rules: Cities; new standards pending 9/17 Minnehaha Creek WD Plan: July 5, 2007 Rules: 6/6/14 Infiltration: redevelopment Discharging to special waters: Infiltration of excess volume over pre-development volume, up to 2-yr, 24-hour event Any grading permit: Soil amendment ripped into existing soil materials to a depth of ten inches on the site Decrease in annual runoff volume If more than 1 acre of new impervious, infiltrate/abstract 1” from new impervious surface Abstraction of 1” runoff from impervious surface 1.1” abstraction from all impervious surface 0.5” runoff from new impervious surface Pending Draft: sites that create >1 acre new impervious abstract 1” from all impervious. Within HVRA, sites that create >10,000 sf new impervious abstract 1.1” 1” from impervious surface. Where 1” infeasible, must do at least 0.5” plus additional TP reduction Wetland buffer ** 16.5 to 50 feet from wetlands depending on mgmt. class; 100 feet from special water No specific requirement 100 feet from a special water Minimum 20 feet, adjusted based on slope, whether runoff s directed to the buffer or if the wetland is ranked “high,” to a maximum 50 feet Avg width 20 to 80 feet from wetlands, depending on mgmt. class; 50 feet from a water basin; 50 feet from the thalweg of any watercourse in a High Risk Erosion Area, 50 feet from the centerline of a public waters watercourse a. <2 acres, 25’ minimum; b. .2 acres, 25’ minimum, average 50’ 16 to 75 feet, depending on wetland mgmt class Linear projects No specific requirement Disturb >1 acre of land; may be excepted from some or all infiltration requirement if lack sufficient right of way Disturb >1 acre of land Projects adding 1 acre or more of impervious (10,000 sf in sensitive areas), for new impervious created by project. Reconstructs that reduce imperviousness by 10% are exempt from rate, volume, and WQ reqs If project constructs more than 5,000 square feet of impervious, and creates ≥1 acre new or fully reconstructed impervious surface. Applies only to all new and reconstructed impervious surface. No specific requirement Projects creating >10,000 sq ft new impervious surface Bluff requirements No removal of vegetation and no new impervious in the Bluff Impact Zone (20’ from top of bluff); new structure setback 30 ft top of bluff, SSTS setback 50 ft No specific requirement No specific requirement Unknown Unknown No removal of vegetation in the Bluff Impact Zone and Bluff Face; new structure setback 30 ft top of bluff, SSTS setback 50 ft. Pending Draft: establishes High Value Resources Area (HVRA) Overlay District No specific requirement TP-40 or Atlas 14 TP-40 No specific requirement No specific requirement Atlas 14 Atlas 14 Cities Pending Draft: Atlas 14 Will adopt Atlas 14 as part of current rule revision ** No single WMO had the most stringent wetland buffers. The City will adopt the most stringent buffers across all WMOs as follows: Preserve management class = 80’ base buffer width and 67’ minimum, Manage 1 = 60’ base buffer width and 34’ minimum, Manage 2 = 40’ base buffer width and 24’ minimum, Manage 3 = 20’ base buffer width and 16’ minimum. Seminary Fen = 100’ base buffer width and 50’ minimum. Base buffer widths will be an average for all management classes. Principal structure setback will be 20’ for all management classes. Page | 5-5 REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 5.1.2 NPDES Permit Implementation Requirements Under the requirements of NPDES Phase II, the City has implemented a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP). Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified in the MPCA-approved SWPPP are implemented on an ongoing basis. Annual activities are detailed in the city’s Annual Report and reviewed at an annual public meeting prior to submittal of the annual report to the MPCA. More information about the SWPPP can be found in the Surface Water Resources Section of the City’s website (http://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/index.aspx?nid=1085.) The City’s Engineering/GIS Department maintains databases and GIS mapping of stormwater and wetland information for both public and private systems. These sources summarize pertinent management information about BMPs, wetlands, and other water resources in the city. The information provided for stormwater ponding systems includes physical condition, maintenance histories, pond elevations, watershed acreages, basin sizes, and other as-built information where available. This information is being collected, updated, and integrated into asset management software on an ongoing basis as part of the NPDES Phase II permit requirements. The State’s General Permit was reissued effective August 1, 2013, and the City has been issued a reauthorized permit. The City’s SWPPP application identified a number of BMPs that the City needs to initiate or update, such as developing certain programs, expanding record keeping, and establishing new or modified policies. The new permit also requires revisions to the city’s ordinances requiring stormwater management, namely adopting more stringent standards to reduce phosphorus and total suspended sediment in stormwater runoff, limiting new volumes of stormwater runoff, public education and staff training, illicit discharge, BMP inspection and maintenance for both public and private stormwater BMPs. 5.2 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS 5.2.1 Education and Outreach Program The City recognizes that a critical element in reaching the long-term goals developed for this LWMP is public education. An education and outreach plan will be developed to achieve these goals and meet requirements of the NPDES permit. The City also uses various media outlets such as local news articles, City newsletters, Facebook, and the City of Chanhassen website to educate citizens on the basics of our stormwater system, provide updates on current actions the City is taking to monitor or improve stormwater systems, and inform residents about opportunities to improve local water bodies through workshops, volunteer opportunities, or rebates. City events and festivals provide additional opportunities for education. High priority topics are periodically identified for emphasis, including topics such as: • Water resource management • Pollinators and Wildlife habitat • Groundwater protection • Low impact and green design such as pervious pavers • Wetlands • Pet waste control • Native plant establishment • Leaf and grass clipping management • Wetland, lake and pond buffers • Lawn chemical and phosphorus fertilizer usage Page | 5-6 REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 Adults and youth can also participate in outreach activities such as: the storm drain labelling program; Wetland Health Evaluation Program (WHEP); park cleanup events; Citizen Assisted Lake Monitoring program (CAMP). The City Council relies on a Planning Commission and Environmental Commission to provide recommendations and direction on water resource topics. The City recognizes the important value of coordination and collaboration with other agencies, and will continue to find opportunities to improve these relationships and will utilize collaborative resources such as WaterShed Partners, Blue Thumb, Let’s Keep it Clean, and the Minnesota Stormwater Coalition to maximize resources and message impacts. Education programming includes training for City staff on various water resources management topics. 5.2.2 Monitoring Program Citizen Assisted Monitoring Program (CAMP). The City of Chanhassen partners with the Metropolitan Council to participate in its Citizen Assisted Monitoring Program (CAMP). Volunteers collect surface water samples from Chanhassen lakes. The samples are then sent to the Metropolitan Council to be analyzed for the following: • Total phosphorus (TP) • Total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) • Chlorophyll-a (CLA) Volunteers also gather the following information: • Measure surface water transparency using a Secchi disc • Record water temperature • Record perceptions such as weather conditions Samples are taken bi-weekly from April through October (14 sampling dates) and are sampled at the lake's deepest open-water location. The CAMP currently monitors the following lakes: • Lake Lucy • Lake Minnewashta • Lake Riley • Lake St. Joe • Lake Susan • Lotus Lake Stream Health Evaluation Program (SHEP). This program gives citizens professional training on how to evaluate a stream health based on physical assessments and bio-monitoring. Citizens evaluate physical characteristics of stream sites, collect and identify macro-invertebrates. Citizens get hands on opportunities to learn about stream ecosystems and assist Carver County in water quality monitoring. Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS). AIS monitoring is coordinated through a partnership program with CCWMO, RPBCWD, and local lake associations Page | 5-7 REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 5.2.3 Operations and Maintenance The City of Chanhassen follows Best Management Practices (BMPs) in operating and maintaining its infrastructure and facilities, consistent with its NPDES permit and this Plan. City staff and projects serve as a model for good housekeeping practices. Some specific Best Management Practices integrated into daily activities include: Street Sweeping. The City sweeps all streets at least annually, and sweeps more frequently in certain key areas. Staff continuously reviews street sweeping practices to assure they are consistent with the latest management recommendations. Some TMDLs and UAAs have identified key areas where enhanced sweeping can provide additional nutrient and sediment removal to protect or improve lake and stream water quality. Snow and Ice Control. Street maintenance staff use the recently-developed Winter Maintenance Assessment Tool from the MPCA to evaluate and enhance snow and ice control practices optimizing the application of road salt - sodium chloride – to limit chloride loading to surface waters. BMP Inspections and Maintenance. In accordance with its NPDES permit, stormwater ponds are inspected at least every five years for sediment accumulation and maintenance needs. The City’s BMP Inspection and Maintenance Program ensures public and private stormwater infrastructure is inspected and maintained to meet regulatory requirements. Private stormwater BMPs on sites over an acre that discharge into the City’s system submit annual inspection reports, and are inspected by City staff once every three years. The City utilizes design standard details setting forth the City’s BMP and infrastructure design and maintenance requirements. The City is developing its Stormwater Inventory Inspection and Maintenance Plan. This Plan includes both activities necessary to meet NPDES Phase II permit obligations as well as general operations and maintenance activities. These include: • BMP operation and maintenance plans • Vegetation Management Plan • Facilities Maintenance Plans • Street and parking lot sweeping • Chloride management • Catch basin and sump inspection, cleaning, and repair. • Sump catch basin inspection, cleaning, and repair. • Sediment removal schedules. • Televising, jetting, and repair of storm sewers and culverts. • Treatment effectiveness evaluation. • Illicit discharge detection and elimination plan As a requirement of its NPDES permit, the City must establish Enforcement Response Procedures and Plan Review Checklists which will be added as Appendix D and E within 6 months of Plan adoption. The City of Chanhassen also maintains up to date GIS shapefiles containing information about water bodies, stormwater facilities, and stormwater infrastructure. Opportunistic BMPs. Where possible, Chanhassen will incorporate BMPs into its street and utility infrastructure to protect and preserve its water and natural resources. Page | 5-8 REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 5.2.4 Capital Improvement Program The Implementation Plan in Tables 5.2 and 5.3 details a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) of projects. The Use Attainability Analyses (UAAs) and Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies have identified potential actions that could help protect and improve the water quality in and enjoyment of studied waterbodies. Maintenance and condition assessments have identified a number of pond maintenance and other projects such as dredging to restore or enhance the effectiveness of those features, and priority actions have been included in the CIP. The CIP also includes projects to install water quality BMPs as part of routine street or other construction projects. These projects are intended to maximize the amount of nutrient and sediment removal from stormwater prior to being discharged into the lakes, streams, and wetlands in the community. The CIP also includes collaborative projects with the watershed districts. The City is open to working together with the districts to identify additional projects or opportunities, including working with the Minnehaha Creek district in advancing its Balanced Urban Ecology policy. This CIP is periodically reviewed and updated, and additional projects may be added as more or better information is available or as opportunities arise. 5.3 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FUNDING The City will fund the Implementation Program (IP) through a combination of sources. The primary source of funds will be Stormwater Utility Fees. The types of activities included in the IP can be categorized as operations and maintenance; programs and special studies; and capital projects. Operations and maintenance and most of the proposed programs and special studies would be funded by the Stormwater Utility, the General Fund, or the Water Surcharge Fund. For capital projects, other sources of funding may be available to supplement Stormwater Utility Funds: matching funds from the watershed districts, contributions from other agencies for cooperative projects, or grant funds. Page | 5-9 REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 Table 5.2. Chanhassen LWMP Implementation Plan 2018-2027. Program/Project Description Cost Year Funding Source* PROGRAMS AND ADMINISTRATION Administration Maintain and update modeling tools Update the city’s integrated stormwater management models and tools and develop new tools and linkages as necessary to manage stormwater and water quality. $30,000 As needed SWUF, GF Implement SWPPP Undertake operations and maintenance activities in accordance with the City’s approved SWPPP and NPDES permit including Vegetation Management, BMP Inspection and Maintenance, and IDDE programs $430,000 Annual SWUF Implement ordinances Implement stormwater management, shoreland, floodplain, and wetland management ordinances. Implement permit program to administer standards and ordinances $95,000 Annual SWUF, permit fees Revise and update ordinances Update ordinances as necessary, based on new MOU, WMO or NPDES permit requirements, evolving standards and new best management practices. $5,000 As needed SWUF CIP Updates Update the CIP annually $5,000 Annual SWUF WCA Administration Continue to act as LGU for administration of WCA for wetlands in the city. $40,000 Annual Permit fees Education and Outreach General education and outreach programming Both individually and with the city’s partners and using a variety of delivery mechanisms to cultivate an environmentally literate public to promote an active community role in sustainable management of water resources. $30,000 Annual SWUF, WMO, CWF Education and Outreach Plan Complete the Education and Outreach Plan to assist with targeting educational needs, audience, funding priorities, partnership opportunities and annual program assessment $5,000 2020 SWUF Monitoring Water quality and AIS monitoring Continue CAMP and AIS support partnership monitoring programs. Develop additional citizen monitoring opportunities that prioritize resident and water resource concerns or fill gaps in existing programs. $20,000 Annual SWUF, WMO, CWF TOTAL: Programs and Administration $660,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Improvement Projects Downtown Water Reuse Project Integrate reuse irrigation from Hwy 5 storm ponds into downtown vision and update project $350,000 2020 SWUF Lake Susan Park Water Re-use Project Partner with RPBCWD to install pump and treatment device to withdraw water from Lake Susan Pond to irrigate Lake Susan Park. $333,000 2018 WMO, CWF, SWUF Chanhassen HS Water Re-use Project Partner with RPBCWD to install pump and treatment device to withdraw water from a pond on the property to irrigate ballfields and other green space at the high school. $350,000 2018 WMO, CWF, SWUF W Central Lotus Lake Channel Restoration Phase II Stabilization of 1,540 lineal feet of deeply incised channel draining 347 acres to Lotus Lake $275,000 2021 WMO, SWUF Lower Bluff Creek TMDL Implementation Volume reduction and rate control in the Bluff Creek drainage are to reduce channel and gully erosion and sedimentation into the Creek. $1,450,000 2018-2022 WMO, SWUF Upper Riley Creek Channel Stabilization Stabilization of in- and near-stream bank undercutting, escarpment and gully erosion in Riley Creek adjacent to the Public Works Facility. $132,000 2021 WMO, SWUF Rice Marsh Lake Iron Enhanced Sand Filter Installation of an iron-enhanced sand filter within Rice Marsh Lake Park. $300,000 2019 WMO, SWUF Maintenance/Protection Projects Street Sweeper Purchase a Vactor street sweeper. The City currently has only one street sweeper $239,000 2019 SWUF, GF, WMO Stormwater Infrastructure Maintenance/ Replacement Annual repair or replacement of public stormwater infrastructure costing less than $25,000. $450,000 Annual SWUF Stormwater Pond Improvements Inspection, repair, and cleaning of stormwater ponds $760,000 Annual SWUF Stormwater Management Component of Street Projects Infrastructure construction or expansion associated with street improvement projects $2,985,000 Annual SWUF, WMO, CWF Lake Lucy Lane Culvert Replacement Culvert replacement and stormwater improvements between wetlands North and South side of Lake Lucy Ln $30,000 2018 SWUF Pioneer Trail Flood Mitigation Reduce flood potential to residential structures by improving failing and deficient infrastructure $150,000 2019 SWUF Strategic Property Acquisition Strategic property acquisition $800,000 Periodic SWUF, WMO TOTAL: Capital Improvement Projects $8,365,000 • GF = General Fund; SWUF = Storm Water Utility Fund; WMO = local Watershed Management Organization; CWF = Clean Water Fund or similar grant funding Page | 5-10 REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 Table 5.3. Chanhassen LWMP Implementation Plan 2018-2027 by year. Program/Project 2018 2019* 2020* 2021* 2022* 2023* 2024* 2025* 2026* 2027* Administration Maintain and update modeling tools $30,000 $31,200 $32,448 $33,746 $35,096 $36,500 $37,960 $39,478 $41,057 $42,699 Implement SWPPP $430,000 $447,200 $465,000 $483,691 $503,000 $523,120 $544,045 $565,807 $588,439 $611,977 Implement ordinances $95,000 $98,800 $102,752 $106,862 $111,136 $115,581 $120,204 $125,012 $130,012 $135,212 Revise and update ordinances $5,000 $5,200 $5,408 $5,624 $5,850 $6,084 $6,327 $6,580 $6,843 $7,117 CIP Updates $5,000 $5,200 $5,408 $5,624 $5,850 $6,084 $6,327 $6,580 $6,843 $7,117 WCA Administration $40,000 $41,600 $43,264 $44,995 $46,794 $48,666 $50,613 $52,638 $54,744 $56,934 Education and Outreach General education and outreach programming $30,000 $31,200 $32,448 $33,746 $35,096 $36,500 $37,960 $39,478 $41,057 $42,699 Education and Outreach Plan $5,000 $5,200 $5,408 $5,624 $5,850 $6,084 $6,327 $6,580 $6,843 $7,117 Monitoring Water quality and AIS monitoring $20,000 $20,800 $21,632 $22,497 $23,397 $24,333 $25,306 $26,318 $27,371 $28,466 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS * * *To Be Determined In Future Annual CIP Updates * * * TMDL/Resource Improvements Downtown Water Reuse Project $350,000 Lake Susan Park Water Re-use Project $50,000 Chanhassen HS Water Re-use Project $100,000 W Central Lotus Lake Channel Restoration Phase II $250,000 Lower Bluff Creek TMDL Implementation $250,000 $175,000 Upper Riley Creek Channel Stabilization $132,000 $25,000 $75,000 Rice Marsh Lk Iron Enhanced Sand Filter $300,000 Maintenance/Protection Projects Street Sweeper $239,000 Stormwater Infrastructure Maintenance/ Replacement $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 Stormwater Pond Improvements $80,000 $80,000 $80,000 $80,000 $80,000 Stormwater Management Component of Street Projects $360,000 $250,000 $100,000 $250,000 Lake Lucy Lane Culvert Replacement $30,000 Pioneer Trail Flood Mitigation $150,000 Strategic Property Acquisition $300,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 TOTAL, IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS $1,891,000 $1,576,400 $1,518,768 $1,322,409 $1,602,069 $802,952 $835,070 $868,473 $903,212 $939,340 *Assumes an annual 4% budget increase; actual increase may differ. Page | 5-11 REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 5.4 ADDRESSING IDENTIFIED PROBLEMS AND ISSUES As noted earlier in Table 3.2 of this Plan, the planning process revealed a number of problems and issues. Table 5.4 repeats those by category, and describes how each was addressed in this Plan. Table 5.4. Implementation actions addressing identified problems and issues. Category Identified Problems and Issues Identified Solutions Water Quality Conditions Lakes and streams are listed on the Clean Water Act Section 303(d) TMDL List of Impaired Waters. The CIP includes, and will periodically be updated to include, projects to achieve pollutant load and runoff volume reductions to address listed impairments and NPDES permit requirements. Nonpoint source pollution reduction is necessary through maintenance practices such as street sweeping, sump manhole cleaning, and BMP inspections. The City has an ongoing program of routine and targeted street sweeping and sump manhole cleaning. Public BMPs will continue to be systematically inspected. Maintenance activities and projects programmed into the CIP. Drainage and Flooding Near stream gullies and escarpments should be addressed to control sediment deposition into surface waters and to protect property and infrastructure. The City will continue to work with WMOs to protect existing and improve flood storage capacity through targeted BMPs and increased street sweeping. The City will prioritize BMPs that protect or repair highly erodible and sensitive soil areas in the Bluff Creek Overlay District. Regulatory Requirements and Operational Policies Atlas 14 updated precipitation frequency data is available for adoption. The City will require stormwater modeling work to use Atlas 14 precipitation depths and nested distributions. Approaches such as Minimal Impact Development and Integrated Management Practices are available to reduce the public expenditures necessary to control runoff and protect and improve water quality. The City will continue to work with developers to incorporate standards into new development and redevelopment. The City’s approved NPDES permit and SWPPP requires ordinance revisions and operating program enhancements. City Code will be revised within 12 months to incorporate volume management and water quality requirements. City goals, policies and ordinances to help protect natural resources may need review and refinement. The City currently has ordinances in place protecting steep slopes and bluffs, shorelands, wetlands, and the Bluff Creek Overlay District Water-Based Recreation Needs Water quality should be protected and improved to protect and enhance recreational opportunities. This Plan includes a number of capital projects and maintenance programs intended to improve water quality to better support fishing, swimming and boating. Control of aquatic invasive species (AIS) continues to be an important concern The City will continue to work with CCWMO, watershed districts, lake associations, and DNR to undertake AIS program activities such as watercraft inspections, biocontrol, fish restocking, or other similar activities. Maintenance Requirements BMP maintenance and repair requirements have been identified during NPDES The City will continue to systematically assess the condition of public BMPs. The CIP includes Page | 5-12 REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 Category Identified Problems and Issues Identified Solutions inspections, including restoration of storage capacity, repair of erosion, and prevention of future problems. and will periodically be updated to include projects identified in the pond inventory and inspections. Street sweeping, sump manhole cleaning, and BMP inspections are necessary on an ongoing basis to help reduce nonpoint source pollutant loads. The maintenance program includes provisions for regular and special street sweeping; inspection and maintenance of sump manholes and catch basins; basin inspections and repairs; illicit discharge detection; and erosion control. Education and Outreach Education and outreach efforts could be expanded with a focus on targeted groups with new and expanded educational opportunities. Education and outreach efforts will be continued including written and electronic communications, and opportunities for participation by citizen volunteers such as the Wetland Health Evaluation Program (WHEP) and the Citizen Assisted Monitoring Program (CAMP) for lakes. Financial Resources Financial resources are limited, requiring that projects be prioritized. The budget in this Plan prioritizes operating programs and projects to address both regulatory and operational needs and water resource improvements. The City will continue to leverage available funding by collaborating with partners and seeking grant funding. Groundwater Protection The LWMP should be coordinated with the Wellhead Protection Program so that policies that encourage infiltration and groundwater recharge are consistent with the policies to protect sensitive groundwater recharge areas Infiltration requirements are integrated with Wellhead Protection requirements to protect groundwater quality. Seminary Fen is a rare calcareous fen and Assumption Creek is a trout stream, both of which are dependent on groundwater. The City participates in the Met Council’s Seminary Fen Work Group to study the effects of groundwater pumping on Seminary Fen. City ordinance imposes stringent standards on development and redevelopment in the Assumption Creek drainage area. Collaboration Opportunities There are opportunities for collaboration with other agencies such as the watershed districts, the Three Rivers Regional Park District, and state agencies to leverage expertise and resources to finance and construct improvements. The City will continue to collaborate with the watershed districts to identify and complete capital projects and pursue opportunities with development and redevelopment projects. Page | 6-1 REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 6.0 Amendments to the Plan The Chanhassen Local Water Management Plan extends from 2018 to 2027. However, this document is intended to be a planning tool that will change as the City’s needs change and may be amended as necessary to meet the City’s goals. The Implementation Plan will be reviewed and updated annually. 6.1.1 WMO Plan Amendments Revisions to this Plan required by Watershed Management Organization (WMO) Plan Amendments will be addressed in accordance with Minn. Stat. 103B.235 and Minn. Rules 8410.0160 Subp.6. 6.1.2 Major Plan Amendments Major Plan Amendments to this Plan, such as adoption of significant revisions to official controls or actions that would change the Goals of the Plan will be reviewed by the City Council and submitted to the appropriate WMO for comment and approval and to the Metropolitan Council for comment as set forth in Minn. Stat. 103B.235 and Minn. Rules 8410.160 Subp. 6. 6.1.3 Routine Updates The Implementation Plan will be reviewed and updated as needed as the City’s annual NPDES, operating programs, and CIP and project needs are evaluated and completed. The City may make routine updates including budget and CIP changes, changes in education and outreach programming, revisions in operations and maintenance practices and other programming changes that are consistent with the Goals and policies set forth in this Plan without making formal revisions to this document. Page | 7-1 REVIEW DRAFT Local Stormwater Management Plan, January 2018 7.0 References Barr, 2010. Bluff Creek TMDL Biological Stressor Identification. <http://www.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/view-document.html?gid=13751> Barr, 2013a. Bluff Creek Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load Report: Turbidity and Fish Bioassessment Impairments. <http://www.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/view-document.html?gid=19684> Barr, 2013b. Lake Lucy and Lake Ann Use Attainability Analysis Update. <http://www.rpbcwd.org/files/7213/8426/4821/LakeLucy_LakeAnn_UAAUpdate_September2013_FINA L.pdf> Bonestroo, 1996. Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resources Management Plan. <http://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/DocumentCenter/Home/View/323> MPCA, 2001. Minnesota River Basin Plan. <http://www.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/view- document.html?gid=9946> Wenck, 2013. Lake Susan Use Attainability Assessment (UAA) Update. <http://www.rpbcwd.org/files/4013/8426/4706/Lake_Susan_Report_FINALred1.pdf> [This page intentionally blank for printing] Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory (This page is intentionally blank.) i Table of Contents 1.0 PHYSICAL INVENTORY ..........................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Physical Environment ................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1.1 Climate and Precipitation................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.2 Geology, Topography and Drainage................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.3 Soils .................................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.2 Biological Environment .............................................................................................................. 1-5 1.2.1 Vegetation .......................................................................................................................... 1-5 1.2.2 Fish ..................................................................................................................................... 1-5 1.2.3 Unique Features and Scenic Areas ..................................................................................... 1-6 1.3 Human Environment .................................................................................................................. 1-8 1.3.1 Land Use ............................................................................................................................. 1-8 1.3.2 Future Land Use ................................................................................................................. 1-8 1.3.3 Parks, Open Space, Recreational Facilities ....................................................................... 1-11 1.3.4 Pollutant Sources ............................................................................................................. 1-11 2.0 WATER RESOURCES INVENTORY ...........................................................................................2-1 2.1.1 Watersheds ........................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1.2 Lakes ................................................................................................................................... 2-3 2.1.3 Streams .............................................................................................................................. 2-3 2.1.4 Wetlands ............................................................................................................................ 2-5 2.1.5 Public Waters ..................................................................................................................... 2-6 2.1.6 Special Waters .................................................................................................................... 2-6 2.1.7 Groundwater ...................................................................................................................... 2-9 2.1.8 Floodplain ........................................................................................................................... 2-9 3.0 SUBWATERSHED SUMMARIES ..............................................................................................3-1 3.1 Lotus Lake Subwatershed ........................................................................................................... 3-3 3.1.1 Subwatershed Characteristics ............................................................................................ 3-3 3.1.2 Issues & Opportunities ....................................................................................................... 3-4 3.2 Lake Minnewashta Subwatershed ............................................................................................. 3-5 3.2.1 Subwatershed Characteristics ............................................................................................ 3-5 3.2.2 Issues & Opportunities ....................................................................................................... 3-5 3.3 Lake Lucy Subwatershed ............................................................................................................ 3-7 3.3.1 Subwatershed Characteristics ............................................................................................ 3-7 3.3.2 Issues & Opportunities ....................................................................................................... 3-8 3.4 Lake Ann Subwatershed ............................................................................................................. 3-9 3.4.1 Subwatershed Characteristics ............................................................................................ 3-9 3.4.2 Issues & Opportunities ..................................................................................................... 3-10 ii 3.5 Lake Susan Subwatershed ........................................................................................................ 3-11 3.5.1 Subwatershed Characteristics .......................................................................................... 3-11 3.5.2 Issues & Opportunities ..................................................................................................... 3-11 3.6 Rice Marsh Lake Subwatershed ............................................................................................... 3-13 3.6.1 Subwatershed Characteristics .......................................................................................... 3-13 3.6.2 Issues & Opportunities ..................................................................................................... 3-13 3.7 Lake Riley Subwatershed .......................................................................................................... 3-15 3.7.1 Subwatershed Characteristics .......................................................................................... 3-15 3.7.2 Issues & Opportunities ..................................................................................................... 3-15 3.8 Bluff Creek Subwatershed ........................................................................................................ 3-17 3.8.1 Subwatershed Characteristics .......................................................................................... 3-17 3.8.2 Issues & Opportunities ..................................................................................................... 3-17 3.9 Lower Minnesota Subwatershed .............................................................................................. 3-19 3.9.1 Subwatershed Characteristics .......................................................................................... 3-19 3.9.2 Issues & Opportunities ..................................................................................................... 3-20 3.10 Drainage to Neighboring Communities ................................................................................... 3-21 3.10.1 Subwatershed Characteristics .......................................................................................... 3-21 3.10.2 Issues & Opportunities ..................................................................................................... 3-22 4.0 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................4-1 Figures Figure 1.1. City of Chanhassen location map. ............................................................................................ 1-2 Figure 1.2. Hydrologic Soil Groups (HSG) in Chanhassen. ......................................................................... 1-4 Figure 1.3. Unique features in Chanhassen. .............................................................................................. 1-7 Figure 1.4. Chanhassen 2016 land use and 2020 MUSA limits. ................................................................. 1-9 Figure 1.5. City of Chanhassen 2040 land use. ........................................................................................ 1-10 Figure 2.1. Watershed Management Organizations in Chanhassen. ........................................................ 2-2 Figure 2.2. Lakes and streams in Chanhassen. .......................................................................................... 2-4 Figure 2.3. Chanhassen wetlands on the National Wetlands Inventory.................................................... 2-7 Figure 2.5. Chanhassen lakes and streams on the DNR Public Waters Inventory. .................................... 2-8 Figure 2.6. FEMA floodplain in Chanhassen. ........................................................................................... 2-10 Figure 3.1. Chanhassen modeled subwatersheds. .................................................................................... 3-2 Figure 3.2. The Lotus Lake subwatershed. ................................................................................................. 3-3 Figure 3.3. Lake Minnewashta subwatershed. .......................................................................................... 3-6 Figure 3.4. Lake Lucy subwatershed. ......................................................................................................... 3-7 Figure 3.5. Lake Ann subwatershed. .......................................................................................................... 3-9 Figure 3.6. Lake Susan subwatershed. ..................................................................................................... 3-12 Figure 3.7. Rice Marsh Lake subwatershed. ............................................................................................ 3-14 Figure 3.8. Lake Riley subwatershed. ....................................................................................................... 3-16 Figure 3.9. Bluff Creek subwatershed. ..................................................................................................... 3-18 Figure 3.10. Lower Minnesota River subwatershed. ............................................................................... 3-19 Figure 3.11. Drainage to neighboring communities. ............................................................................... 3-21 iii Tables Table 1.1. Climate and precipitation data at Chanhassen, 1981-2010. ..................................................... 1-1 Table 1.2. 2016 land use in the City of Chanhassen. ................................................................................. 1-8 Table 2.1. Watershed Management Organizations within Chanhassen.................................................... 2-1 Table 2.2. Water quality standards for lakes in the North Central Hardwood Forest Ecoregion. ............. 2-3 Table 2.3. Characteristics of lakes in Chanhassen, 2007-2016. ................................................................. 2-3 Table 2.4. Characteristics of streams in the City of Chanhassen. .............................................................. 2-3 Table 2.5. NWI wetland area by type in the City of Chanhassen. .............................................................. 2-5 Table 3.1. Chanhassen modeled subwatersheds. ...................................................................................... 3-1 Table 3.2. Lotus Lake subwatershed 2010 land use. ................................................................................. 3-4 Table 3.3. Lake Minnewashta subwatershed 2010 land use. .................................................................... 3-5 Table 3.4. Lake Lucy subwatershed 2010 land use. ................................................................................... 3-8 Table 3.5. Lake Ann subwatershed 2010 land use. .................................................................................... 3-9 Table 3.6. Lake Susan subwatershed 2010 land use. ............................................................................... 3-11 Table 3.7. Rice Marsh Lake subwatershed 2010 land use. ...................................................................... 3-13 Table 3.8. Lake Riley subwatershed 2010 land use. ................................................................................ 3-15 Table 3.9. Bluff Creek subwatershed 2010 land use. ............................................................................... 3-17 Table 3.10. Lower Minnesota River subwatershed 2010 land use. ........................................................ 3-20 (This page left intentionally blank) Page | 1-1 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory 1.0 Physical Inventory 1.1 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT Page | 1-2 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory The City of Chanhassen lies in the northeastern corner of Carver County (Figure 1.1 ), within the Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Area. The city encompasses 22.9 square miles and is Page | 1-3 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory bordered by Chaska to the west, Shorewood to the north, Eden Prairie to the east, and the Minnesota River to the south. A small part of the City extends into Hennepin County. 1.1.1 Climate and Precipitation The climate is humid continental with moderate precipitation, wide daily temperature variations, warm humid summers, and cold winters. The total average annual precipitation is approximately 31.2 inches (Table 1.1) while the annual snowfall average is approximately 54 inches, equivalent to approximately 5.4 inches of water precipitation. Table 1.1. Climate and precipitation data at Chanhassen, 1981-2010. Month Average Temperature (F) Average Precipitation (inches) Average Snowfall (inches) January 14.3 0.87 10.3 February 19.1 0.94 9.7 March 31.3 1.78 10.8 April 46.5 3.00 3.4 May 58.0 3.66 0.0 June 67.6 4.02 0.0 July 72.0 3.59 0.0 August 69.9 4.14 0.0 September 60.7 3.43 0.0 October 47.8 2.51 0.4 November 32.7 1.97 5.4 December 18.1 1.25 13.9 Annual Average 44.8 31.16 53.9 Source: NOAA National Climatic Data Center. 1.1.2 Geology, Topography and Drainage The landscape of Chanhassen was shaped by the Des Moines lobe of the Wisconsin glaciation. The bedrock underlying Chanhassen is primarily Prairie du Chien Group dolostone, with Jordan sandstone underlying a bedrock valley along the western side of the city and Lone Rock Formation in the Minnesota River Valley (Mossler and Chandler 2009). The surficial geology is primarily glacial till - pebbly, unsorted, with scattered cobbles and rare boulders – with scattered deposits of organic debris and marl. Outwash and floodplain alluvium is found in the River valley. Refer to the Carver County Geologic Atlas for more information. Page | 1-4 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory Figure 1.1. City of Chanhassen location map. Source: Minnesota DNR, World Street Map Page | 1-5 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory The landscape is characterized by four geomorphic units. The central part of the city is located within the Prior Lake Moraine unit, which consists of irregular ground, end and terminal moraines, and ice disintegration features of loamy texture. The dominant landform is rolling hills and irregularly placed knolls with relief ranging from 20 to 100 feet above the base, with wetlands in deeply inset depressions. The northwest area of the city, west of Lakes Ann and Lucy and including Lake Minnewashta and the Arboretum is within the Emmons-Faribault Moraine, and the topography is typical of that region – gentle rolling hills with an abundance of lakes and ponds. The northeast portion of the city, including the areas around Lotus Lake and Rice Marsh Lake, are within the Twin Cities Formation geomorphic unit. The landscape of the Twin Cities Formation is similar to the Prior Lake Moraine unit – steeply and irregularly rolling – but it is underlain with a silty, clayey, glacial till. In the southern part of the city, the Minnesota Valley Outwash Plain is nearly level with low terraces, and comprised of areas of sand and gravel. 1.1.3 Soils The soils in Chanhassen are generally moderate to well drained Lester and Kilkenny clay loams with pockets of moderately to poorly drained soils. In the Minnesota River Valley, floodplain soils are generally muck or silt loams and range from moderately to very poorly drained. Refer to the Carver County Soil Survey for more information. Soils are classified by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) into hydrologic soil groups (HSGs) to indicate the minimum rate of infiltration obtained for bare soil after prolonged wetting. The HSGs are A, B, C and D. Figure displays the hydrologic characteristics of soils in Chanhassen. Type B soils predominate, but there are many pockets of B/D and C/D soils. These dual-designation soils tend to follow the terrain and characterize the lower areas. A Sandy soils with low runoff potential. These soils have a high rate of infiltration even when thoroughly wet. They are deep, well to excessively drained sands or gravels. B Loamy soils with a moderate infiltration and transmission rate when thoroughly wetted and with moderately fine to moderately coarse textures. Water movement through t hese soils is moderately rapid. C Sandy clay loam soils with a slow rate of infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. Water movement through these soils is moderate or moderately slow and they generally have a restrictive layer that impedes the downward movement of water. D Clayey soils with very slow infiltration rates because of clay content, high water table, or claypan or clay layer at or near the surface. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. A/D B/D C/D Dual hydrologic soil groups are given for certain wet soils that could be adequately drained. The first letter applies to the drained and the second to the undrained condition. Soils are assigned to dual groups if the depth to a permanent water table is the sole criteria for assigning a soil to hydrologic group D. Source: Natural Resources Conservation Service. Page | 1-6 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory Figure 1.2. Hydrologic Soil Groups (HSG) in Chanhassen. Source: NRCS, SSURGO. Page | 1-7 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory 1.2 BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT 1.2.1 Vegetation The City’s landscape has gone through many changes due to human activity. Prior to European settlement the landscape across much of the central part of the city was “oak openings.” Today oak openings are called oak savanna, a now-rare in Minnesota landscape that is transitional between prairie and forest. Savannas are grasslands with scattered trees providing between 30 percent and 70 percent canopy cover, and are maintained by fire. Bur oaks and a few other tree species typical of oak savannas are fire resistant. When a fire swept through a savanna area, the maples, basswood, and other fire- susceptible species burned but the oaks remained and the prairie species were rejuvenated. Most of the rest of the city was Big Woods, where oak woodland and maple-basswood forests were the dominant vegetation types. Upon settlement, much of the landscape was converted to agriculture and eventually suburban development. However, there are remnants of the original landscape, as well as patches of only moderately impacted lands that retain some higher ecological values. The Minnesota County Biological Survey (MBS) has identified those locations in the Metro area with intact native plant communities, and those with biodiversity significance. The ecological value of these Regionally Significant Terrestrial and Wetland Ecological Areas is determined by examining attributes of the patches including size, shape, cover type diversity, and adjacent land use. Three areas of outstanding ecological value have been identified in Chanhassen: Seminary Fen; Rice Marsh Lake and its riparian wetland; and the Minnesota River corridor. The Minnesota River Valley is home to significant natural communities, including remnants of the Big Woods, river bluffs, and wetland areas. Additional areas identified as having high ecological value include patches within the Landscape Arboretum; the Lower Bluff Creek corridor; and patches in Lake Minnewashta Regional Park. Other small patches around Lake St. Joe and Lake Ann and in the Arboretum were classified as moderate ecological value. Most of the significant natural communities identified in the Carver County Biological Survey are in areas under public ownership and have been preserved as park or managed conservation areas. 1.2.2 Fish Two boat launches on Lake Minnewashta provide public access to the lake for fishing and boating. There is also a fishing pier at Roundhouse Park, which is extended to reach beyond the aquatic plant edge. The most recent fish survey, completed in 2011, found abundant northern pike and largemouth bass, and six species of panfish. Rough fish are present but in low numbers. The DNR has imposed a catch and release limitation on largemouth bass. A fishing pier and boat launch are available on Lake Ann at Lake Ann Community Park. Each year on the first Saturday in February, the City hosts February Festival on Lake Ann. One of the highlights of this community event is an ice fishing contest. The Minnesota DNR completed a detailed fish survey and assessment on Lake Ann in 2012. The DNR is actively managing the fishery, having imposed both a catch and release limitation on largemouth bass and a size restriction on northern pike. The survey found that these regulations appear to be helping to restore the size structure for those communities. The 2012 assessment also included an evaluation of fish in the shallow, nearshore habitats to calculate an Index of Biotic Integrity score. Sensitive species such as minnows and darters were mostly absent, contributing to a low IBI score. In August 2012, Ann Page | 1-8 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory Lake scored 74.6 out of a maximum of 160, indicating possible water quality and habitat impairment. In September 2012, the nearshore survey was replicated and the second score was 76.4, very similar to the first. There are special regulations limiting human consumption of fish from Lake Ann. A fishing pier and boat launch are available on Lake Susan at Lake Susan Community Park. The 2009 Lake Susan DNR fish survey found that fish abundances were low, as historically been the case. There are special regulations limiting human consumption of fish from Lake Susan. The University of Minnesota is conducting research on common carp in Lake Susan. The goal of carp research in Lake Susan is to determine the relationship between carp abundance (biomass) and 'lake health' measured as water quality, vegetation density and native fish. To do so, specific numbers of carp are removed from each lake while improvements in water quality, vegetation, and native fish are monitored. In 2009, carp biomass in the lake was reduced from about 300 lbs/acre to about 60 lbs/acre. After the carp were removed, aquatic vegetation coverage increased from 5 percent of the lake to 45 percent. Spring water clarity was greatly increased, but there appears to be minimal impact on summer clarity and total phosphorus concentration. Lotus is primarily managed for walleye and largemouth bass, with walleye fingerling and adult fish stocking every other year. There are special regulations limiting human consumption of fish from Lotus Lake. 1.2.3 Unique Features and Scenic Areas Seminary Fen, a DNR Scientific and Natural Area (SNA), lies to the north of Flying Cloud Drive, west of Bluff Creek Drive (Figure 1.3). Named for an old seminary that was once on the site, Seminary Fen contains one of the rarest types of wetland in the United States, a calcareous fen. Calcareous fens are a special type of wetland that can occur only at the base of slopes or bluffs, where cool, mineral-rich groundwater appears as springs. Water charged with minerals comes to the surface, then saturates and helps maintain thick layers of peat created by the decomposition of the plants that grow in the oxygen- poor water. Fewer than five hundred calcareous fens survive in the world. It is home to many threatened and endangered plant species. Calcareous fens have special protection under Minnesota state law and may not be drained, filled or otherwise altered or degraded. A history of Seminary Fen may be found at mnopedia.org/place/seminary-fen-scientific-and-natural-area. Seminary Fen's groundwater drains into Assumption Creek, one of the few trout streams in the Metro Area. South of Flying Cloud Drive and west of TH 101, in the floodplain of the Minnesota is the DNR’s Raguet Wildlife Management Area (WMA). Wildlife viewing and hunting are allowed in this WMA. Portions of the city south of Flying Cloud Drive are located in the Minnesota River Valley National Wildlife Refuge. Page | 1-9 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory Figure 1.3. Unique features in Chanhassen. Source: MnDNR. Page | 1-10 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory 1.3 HUMAN ENVIRONMENT 1.3.1 Land Use Figure 1.4 shows 2016 land use within Chanhassen. The city is over 80% developed, and has a commercial and industrial core centered on TH 5, surrounded by residential uses of various densities. According to the City’s Available Land inventory, only about 3% of vacant land in the city is developable. Regional and local parks and open space, including Lake Minnewashta Regional Park, the University of Minnesota Landscape Arboretum, encompassing over one-fifth of the city’s area. Only the Minnesota Valley Wildlife Refuge and areas within the Minnesota River Bluffs in the southern part of the city are outside the Metropolitan Urban Services Area (MUSA). Table 1.2. 2016 land use in the City of Chanhassen. Land Use Area (acres) Area (%) Single Family 4,225.0 28.8% Parks and Recreation 2,999.1 20.5% Undeveloped 2,872.1 19.6% Water 1,712.8 11.7% Agricultural 845.9 5.8% Industrial 453.9 3.1% Commercial 435.8 3.0% Multi Family 398.6 2.7% Highway 370.2 2.5% Institutional 280.9 1.9% Extractive 43.8 0.3% Mixed Use 21.1 0.1% 14,659.3 Source: Metropolitan Council from city comprehensive plan and air photos. 1.3.2 Future Land Use Planned 2040 land use from the 2040 Comprehensive Guide Plan is shown in Figure 1.5. The southernmost part of the City south to Flying Cloud Drive is within the MUSA 2020 boundary, and is expected to be in development by that time. Some large-lot residential development relies on individual subsurface sewage treatment systems, and will continue to do so until the majority of residents in an area desire to hook up to city sewer and water. The area south of Flying Cloud Drive to the Minnesota River is currently unsewered, and there are no plans to extend urban services to that zone. Page | 1-11 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory Figure 1.4. Chanhassen 2016 land use and 2020 MUSA limits. Source: Metropolitan Council, from city Comprehensive Plans and air photo interpretation Page | 1-12 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory Figure 1.5. City of Chanhassen 2040 land use. Source: City of Chanhassen 2030 Comprehensive Plan Page | 1-13 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory 1.3.3 Parks, Open Space, Recreational Facilities Three regional parks and recreation facilities are located in Chanhassen: Carver County’s Lake Minnewashta Regional Park, the Minnesota Landscape Arboretum, operated by the University of Minnesota, and the Three Rivers Park District Minnesota River Bluffs LRT Regional Trail, which passes through southern Chanhassen, crossing Bluff Creek and running north of Seminary Fen. Swimming beaches are available Lake Minnewashta Regional Park, and city parks Lake Ann Park, Carver Beach on Lotus Lake, and Roundhouse Park on Lake Minnewashta. 1.3.4 Pollutant Sources The Wellhead Protection Plan (WHPP) completed in 2004 evaluated and included recommendations for monitoring or remediating potential pollutant sources such as dumpsites, leaking underground storage tank sites, Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup sites and others. The WHPP was updated in 2011 to incorporate new information and new wells and updated groundwater modeling. A new WHPA and DWSMA were delineated and well and aquifer vulnerabilities were also reassessed and updated. Subsurface sewage treatment systems (SSTS), or septic systems, and operating or abandoned wells can also be a source of pollution. Chanhassen had an estimated 388 septic systems. The MDH regulates new and abandoned wells and maintains a comprehensive list of the status of each. A plan for management of private wells and septic systems is also included in the City’s WHPP. Information on other potential pollutant sources can be found by contacting the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency or the Environmental Protection Agency, or visiting the EPA’s EnviroMapper website at www.epa.gov. Page | 2-1 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory 2.0 Water Resources Inventory 2.1.1 Watersheds The Twin Cities Metropolitan Area is subdivided into about 34 watersheds, each managed by a Watershed Management Organization (WMO). WMOs may be either Joint Powers consortia of cities or Watershed Districts, which are special units of government. Chanhassen is located in four watersheds (Table 2.1 and Figure 2.1), three of which are Watershed Districts, and one a Joint Powers Organization. Table 2.1. Watershed Management Organizations within Chanhassen. Watershed Total Area (sq. miles) Area in Chanhassen (sq. miles) Percent of Chanhassen Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek WD 47.1 14.0 61.3% Minnehaha Creek WD 180.1 5.2 22.8 Lower Minnesota River WD 75.9 2.9 12.7 Carver County WMO 320.2 0.75 3.2 TOTAL 22.85 100% 2.1.1.1 Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District The RPBCWD covers approximately 32.8 square miles in Hennepin County and approximately 14.3 square miles in Carver County. Nearly two-thirds of Chanhassen is within the RPBCWD, including six lakes – Lucy, Ann, Susan, Lotus, and part of Riley and Rice Marsh. Bluff Creek drains the central area of the city south to Rice Lake. Riley Creek is formed at the outlet of Lake Ann and flows to Rice Marsh Lake and into Eden Prairie. The northeast corner of the city flows to Lotus Lake, which outlets east into Eden Prairie and Purgatory Creek. 2.1.1.2 Minnehaha Creek Watershed District The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) encompasses 181 square miles in Hennepin and Carver Counties. Almost one-quarter of the city is within the MCWD, including the area west of Hazeltine Boulevard draining to Lake Minnewashta, and an area along the northern border, part of which drains to Christmas Lake and part into Lake Galpin to the north. Lake Minnewashta and Lake St. Joe are in this drainage area, as is a southern bay of Christmas Lake. 2.1.1.3 Lower Minnesota River Watershed District The LMRWD is located in the far southern part of Chanhassen and includes the Flying Could Drive corridor and floodplain to the Minnesota River, and the area east of TH 101 and south of Pioneer Trail to the river. The overall District boundaries encompass an area of 64 square miles of Carver, Hennepin, Dakota, Scott, and Ramsey Counties, including bluffs on both sides of the Minnesota River. The LMRWD includes Rice Lake, Assumption Creek, and Seminary Fen. Page | 2-2 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory 2.1.1.4 Carver County WMO A few small areas of Chanhassen are within the Carver WMO. In southwestern Chanhassen, the area west of Bluff Creek Drive, north of Seminary Fen, and south of TH 212 is in the Carver WMO and drains into Chaska. A small corner of Chanhassen west and south of Lyman Boulevard and Galpin Boulevard drains to Lake Hazeltine in Chaska. Figure 2.1. Watershed Management Organizations in Chanhassen. Source: Board of Water and Soil Resources. Page | 2-3 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory 2.1.2 Lakes There are 9 major lakes in Chanhassen, which are shown on Figure 2.2. Minnesota’s standards for lake water quality vary depending on the depth classification of the lake (Table 2.2). Shallow lakes are 15 feet deep or less, or 80% or more of the lake area is shallow enough to support rooted aquatic plants. The lake number and shoreland classification, lake morphometry, and water quality data are shown in Table 2.3. More information about the lakes can be found online at the DNR’s LakeFinder website: dnr.state.mn.us/lakefind/index.html. Table 2.2. Water quality standards for lakes in the North Central Hardwood Forest Ecoregion. Parameters Shallow Lakes Deep Lakes Total Phosphorus (TP) (g/L) ≤60 ≤40 Chlorophyll-a (chl-a) (g/L) ≤20 ≤14 Secchi Depth transparency (SD) (meters) ≥1.0 ≥1.4 Source: MPCA. Table 2.3. Characteristics of lakes in Chanhassen, 2007-2016. Lake DNR ID# Surface Area (ac) Max Depth (ft) Depth Class DNR Class* Summer Average TP (µg/L) Chl-a (µg/L) SD (m) Ann 10-0012 116 42 Deep RD 23 9 3 Christmas 27-0137 257 87 Deep RD 13 2 6 Harrison 10-0008 6 Na Shallow NE NA NA NA Lotus 10-0006 246 29 Deep RD 54 36 1 Lucy 10-0007 92 18 Shallow RD 67 21 1 Minnewashta 10-0009 738 70 Deep RD 24 9 2 Rice Marsh 10-0001 79 11 Shallow NE 120 2 2 Rice 27-0132 238 Na Shallow NE NA NA NA Riley 10-0002 297 49 Deep RD 41 21 2 Susan 10-0013 93 17 Shallow RD 119 40 1 St. Joe 10-0011 14 52 Deep NE 25 5 3 Sources: Minnesota DNR, MPCA EQuIS. *NE = Natural Environment; RD = Recreational Development (Shoreland Management Classification) 2.1.3 Streams Bluff Creek is the longest stream in the City (Table 2.4, Figure 2.4), rising from a wetland complex in the northwest quadrant of Highway 5 and Galpin Boulevard, then flowing just over 7 miles southeast to Rice Lake in the Minnesota River floodplain. The headwaters of Riley Creek is Lake Ann. From the lake’s outlet Riley Creek flows southeast to Lake Susan, and then outlets Lake Susan to Rice Marsh Lake. On the Eden Prairie side of the lake, the Creek flows out of that lake south to Riley Lake, then outlets that lake and flows to the Minnesota River. Assumption Creek is a DNR-designated trout stream. Table 2.4. Characteristics of streams in the City of Chanhassen. Stream Length (mi) Bluff Creek 7.1 Riley Creek 2.5 Assumption Creek 2.8 Source: MnDNR. Page | 2-4 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory Figure 2.2. Lakes and streams in Chanhassen. Source: Minnesota DNR. Page | 2-5 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory The Bluff Creek Turbidity and Fish Biota TMDL and its associated Biological Stressor Identification Study assessed water quality conditions in Bluff Creek to determine the potential cause or causes of impairment of its fish community. Monitoring data from 1991 through 2008 were reviewed. Dissolved oxygen concentrations were adequate to support aquatic life. High nutrient and sediment concentrations and loads in the Creek were mostly associated with storm events, washed off from the watershed. The Creek does not meet state standards for turbidity as measured by Total Suspended Solids (TSS) concentration. The TMDL found that the source of the excess TSS was both watershed load and also sediment contributed from streambank and gully erosion. No water quality data is available for Riley Creek in Chanhassen, or for Assumption Creek. 2.1.4 Wetlands The US Fish and Wildlife Service compiled wetland maps from aerial photo interpretation as part of the National Wetland Inventory (NWI). Wetland scientists use two common classification schemes to identify wetland type – the US Fish and Wildlife Service’s “Circular 39” system, and a replacement classification system developed by Cowardin et al. for the Fish and Wildlife Service, commonly referred to as the Cowardin system. The Circular 39 system was originally developed as a means for classifying wetlands for waterfowl habitat purposes. Nine of the Circular 39 freshwater wetland types are found in Minnesota. The Cowardin scheme is a hierarchical classification based on landscape position, substrate, flooding regime, and vegetation. While the Cowardin scheme has been officially adopted by the Fish and Wildlife Service and other agencies, the Circular 39 system is still commonly used because of its simplicity and ease of use. The original NWI was developed in the 1980s from aerial photography. The DNR is updating the NWI statewide using remote sensing imagery; the East-Central region of Minnesota, including Carver County, was reevaluated using 2010 and 2011 imagery. According to the updated NWI (Figure 2.3 and Table 2.5, wetlands, including lakes, cover approximately 27.3 percent of the city’s surface. The NWI map is not considered definitive. A delineation of wetland boundaries is required to be completed any time development or other impacts may occur near or in a wetland. Table 2.5. NWI wetland area by type in the City of Chanhassen. Circular 39 Type Acres Percent Cowardin Type Acres Percent 1 - Seasonally Flooded 1,077.78 7.4% Emergent (EM) 1,619.9 11.1% 2 - Wet Meadow 4.05 0.0% Unconsolidated Bottom (UB) 1,483.8 10.1% 3 - Shallow Marsh 906.68 6.2% Forested (FO) 387.6 2.6% 4 - Deep Marsh 123.87 0.8% Aquatic Bed (AB) 310.0 2.1% 5 - Shallow Open Water 1,638.66 11.2% Upland Scrub-shrub (SS) 198.6 1.4% 6 - Shrub Swamp 198.60 1.4% Unconsolidated Shore (US) 2.8 0.0% 7 - Wooded Swamp 1.70 0.0% Upland 10,656.6 72.7% 80 - Mun. and Indus. Activities 12.36 0.1% Grand Total 14,659.3 90 - Riverine 39.02 0.3% 98 - Uplands 10,656.58 72.7% Grand Total 14,659.3 Source: Minnesota DNR, 2013 NWI Update East-Central Minnesota. Page | 2-6 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory The City has also completed its own wetland inventory and functions and values assessment. A functions and values assessment uses a structured methodology to evaluate the condition of the wetland and its function as part of the overall ecosystem. Examples of the features assessed include vegetative quality and diversity, habitat diversity, flood attenuation, human disturbance, etc. Each wetland is assigned to one of five classifications based on its weighted score: Outstanding, Preserve, Manage 1, Manage 2, or Manage 3. The City’s Wetland Protection ordinance (Section 20.401 – 20.421) regulates requirements for structure setbacks and wetland buffer widths based on each wetland’s management classification. The City maintains an Official Map of wetlands by classification that is continuously updated. 2.1.5 Public Waters State Statutes classify certain waterbodies as Waters of the State and the DNR maintains maps and lists on the Public Waters Inventory (PWI). Public Waters wetlands include all type 3, type 4, and type 5 wetlands (as defined in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Circular No. 39, 1971) that are 10 acres or more in size in unincorporated areas or 2.5 acres or more in size in incorporated areas. There are 12 public waters basins (lakes) and 21 public waters wetlands in Chanhassen. Public watercourses are defined as natural and altered watercourses with a total drainage area greater than two square miles or natural and altered watercourses designated by the DNR commissioner as trout streams. Public watercourses in Chanhassen include Bluff, Riley, and Assumption Creeks, the outlet of Lotus Lake (Purgatory Creek), and the outlet of Lake Minnewashta that flows to Lake Virginia. Work within waterbodies designated on the PWI is regulated by the DNR. Public waters wetlands and watercourses are shown on Figure 2.4. 2.1.6 Special Waters As noted above, two Outstanding Resource Value Waters are located within Chanhassen: Seminary Fen, a calcareous fen, and Assumption Creek, a trout stream. These are shown on Figure 1.3 above. Page | 2-7 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory Figure 2.3. Chanhassen wetlands on the National Wetlands Inventory. Source: Minnesota DNR. Page | 2-8 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory Figure 2.4. Chanhassen lakes and streams on the DNR Public Waters Inventory. Source: Minnesota DNR. Page | 2-9 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory 2.1.7 Groundwater Chanhassen relies on groundwater for its municipal water system, operating ten wells drawing water from the Prairie du Chien-Jordan and Prairie du Chien-Wonewoc aquifers. The City manages groundwater principally through its Wellhead Protection Plan (WHPP), which was updated in 2012. This plan provides comprehensive guidance to protect wellhead areas from contamination while meeting the requirements of the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act and the Minnesota Groundwater Protection Act. The purpose of the WHPP is to provide measures needed to protect the groundwater entering and flowing through this area in order to protect our drinking water supply from contamination. The following items are included in the WHPP: • Delineation of the Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA) and Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA) for the public water supply system • Identification of potential sources of contamination to the DWSMA as well as the degrees of risk of land uses within this area • Definition of goals and objectives and set priorities to manage the risk and/or potential contaminant sources to minimize impacts to the DWSMA • Identification of monitoring methods to track the effectiveness of the goals and objectives • Planning contingency measures to address potential interruption of public water supply if contaminants are identified within the DWSMA The Carver County Groundwater Plan was updated in 2016 and contains goals, objectives, and strategies for protecting groundwater resources. It is focused on preventing groundwater contamination, ensuring the continued groundwater supply, and protecting groundwater dependent natural resources like the Seminary Fen and Assumption Creek from the impacts of groundwater withdrawals and groundwater contamination 2.1.8 Floodplain As a part of the FEMA Map Modernization Program, the Federal Flood Insurance Program has delineated the floodplain in Chanhassen and includes floodway and flood fringe areas inundated as a result of the 1-percent annual chance (100-year) flood. The 1-percent annual chance (100-year) floodplain, as defined by the Flood Insurance Program for flood insurance purposes, was detailed by a Flood Insurance Study. The resultant maps are expected to be adopted in 2017-2018 and will be on file at City Hall and with the DNR and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Land use regulations define the floodplain as the area covered by the flood that has a one percent chance of occurring each year, also known as the 100-year flood. The floodplain is divided into two zoning districts: the floodway and flood fringe. The floodway includes the river channel and nearby land areas which must remain open to discharge the 100-year flood. The flood fringe, while in the flood plain, lies outside the floodway. Regulations usually allow development in the flood fringe but require flood-proofing or raising to the legal flood protection elevation. The City has a floodplain overlay district ordinance in effect that establishes allowable uses and in the floodplain, floodway, and flood fringe. That ordinance requires that fill or excavation within the floodplain is subject to a conditional use permit. Page | 2-10 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory Figure 2.5. FEMA floodplain in Chanhassen. Source: DNR Preliminary Map Modernization Data. Page | 3-1 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory 3.0 Subwatershed Summaries As part of this Plan, the HydroCAD hydrologic and hydraulic models for the City were updated to include the most recent watershed and basin information and the newly-redefined 100-year Atlas 14 precipitation event. In 2014, the National Weather Service Hydrometeorological Design Studies Center released NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 8, detailing updated precipitation frequency estimates. The new estimates are based on improvements in three primary areas: denser precipitation data networks with a longer period of record, advanced statistical techniques, and new techniques for spatial interpolation and mapping. Atlas 14 improves the accuracy of the precipitation frequency estimates, and supersedes older references, including the commonly-used Technical Paper 40, which was published in 1961. Nine major subwatersheds were modeled (Table 3.1 and Figure 3.1), along with several small areas designed under the classification “Drainage to Other Communities.” The purpose of performing this modeling is for planning-level assessments. The models were not calibrated to actual runoff and flows, and are not intended to be flood studies. Model output is quite lengthy and is available electronically. The models and output files are incorporated into this Plan as Appendix B. The following sections briefly describe each of the subwatersheds and their features and issues and opportunities where available. Table 3.1. Chanhassen modeled subwatersheds. Subwatershed Area (acres) Area (sq mi) % of Total Lotus Lake 1,318.0 2.06 9.0 Lake Minnewashta 2,538.4 3.97 17.3 Lake Lucy 949.9 1.48 6.5 Lake Ann 257.2 0.40 1.8 Lake Susan 1,250.9 1.95 8.5 Rice Marsh Lake 718.7 1.12 4.9 Lake Riley 928.0 1.45 6.3 Bluff Creek 4,164.6 6.51 28.4 Lower Minnesota 1,334.9 2.09 9.1 To Neighboring Communities 1,199.2 1.87 8.2 TOTAL 14,659.7 22.91 Page | 3-2 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory Figure 3.1. Chanhassen modeled subwatersheds. Page | 3-3 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory 3.1 LOTUS LAKE SUBWATERSHED 3.1.1 Subwatershed Characteristics The Lotus Lake subwatershed (Figure 3.2) is over 1,000 acres in size, with a majority of the land cover in single-family residential (Table 3.2). There is a substantial (50-90 foot) drop from the highlands on the west side of the lake to the lake. A large ravine originates in LL 1-7 and LL 1-6 and flows through pond LL 1-5 to Lotus Lake. Lotus Lake discharges into and is the headwaters of Purgatory Creek. Another ravine flows from Kerber Pond in LL 5-1 to the lake, and another from LL 6-2 to the lake. Numerous ponds and wetlands dot the subwatershed. Figure 3.2. The Lotus Lake subwatershed. Page | 3-4 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory Table 3.2. Lotus Lake subwatershed 2010 land use. Land Use Area (ac) Percent Residential Low Density 734.2 69% Right Of Way 157.1 15% Parks Open Space 101.6 10% Public Semi Public 50.4 5% Residential Medium Density 20.7 2% Residential High Density 4.1 <1% 1,068.1 100% 3.1.2 Issues & Opportunities Lotus Lake Water Quality. Lotus Lake is classified as a deep lake, with a surface area of 246 acres and a maximum depth of nearly 30 feet. Water quality in the lake does not meet State of Minnesota standards, with excessive nutrient and chlorophyll-a concentrations and poor water clarity. In 2015, the DNR conducted a survey of the quality and ecologic integrity of the fish community in the lake using a tool called the Fish Index of Biotic Integrity (F-IBI). That analysis indicated that the fish community is impaired compared to similar lakes, with some pollution-tolerant species and no pollution-intolerant species present, a lack of vegetation-dwelling fish and a low biomass of top carnivores. Common carp are present in the lake, and efforts to reduce the population and biomass appear at this time to be successful. An aquatic vegetation survey found mostly native vegetation with the invasive Eurasian watermilfoil and curly-leaf pondweed at low abundance. A Use Attainability Analysis (UAA), which is a diagnostic study similar to a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) study, was completed in 2016 (Barr 2016). This analysis estimated that just under 30 percent of the nutrient load to the lake came from watershed sources. Ponds and wetlands in the Lotus Lake subwatershed provide filtering and settling of the particulate matter in stormwater, removing a significant amount of total phosphorus (TP). However, these types of practices do little to remove dissolved phosphorus. Over two-thirds of the load to the lake comes from internal sources, mostly release from the sediments during extended periods of low-oxygen conditions at the lakebed. To improve water quality to meet state water quality standards and enhance conditions for fish, phosphorus from watershed and internal sources needs to be reduced by 37 percent from the existing condition. The UAA identified several potential Best Management Practices (BMPs) that could be considered in this subwatershed. Treatment practices that can remove dissolved TP such as infiltration and enh anced filtration practices in addition to practices in currently untreated areas could help reduce nutrients conveyed from the watershed. An internal load project such as an alum treatment could significantly reduce internal load form sediment release. Ravine Stabilization. A project to stabilize 1,540 lineal feet of deeply incised channel between Carver Beach Road and Lotus Lake is included in the CIP and Implementation Plan in 2018. Page | 3-5 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory 3.2 LAKE MINNEWASHTA SUBWATERSHED 3.2.1 Subwatershed Characteristics The Lake Minnewashta subwatershed (Figure 3.3) is the second largest in the city, and is dominated by the 738 acre Lake Minnewashta (Table 3.3). Parks and Open Space are also a defining feature, as the subwatershed includes Lake Minnewashta Regional Park Large, portions of the University of Minnesota Landscape Arboretum and Horticultural Research Center, and Camp Fire MN’s Camp Tanadoona. There are a number of mostly small, direct drainage subwatersheds. Lake St. Joe, a small but deep lake surrounded by wetlands, discharges through storm sewer to Lake Minnewashta. Lake Minnewashta outlets through a channel to Lake Virginia in the city of Victoria and ultimately to Lake Minnetonka. Table 3.3. Lake Minnewashta subwatershed 2010 land use. Land Use Area (ac) Percent Public Semi Public 716.4 40% Residential Low Density 523.6 29% Parks Open Space 370.9 21% Right Of Way 137.1 8% Residential Large Lot 27.1 2% Residential Medium Density 8.7 <1% Commercial 7.5 <1% Office 2.2 <1% 1,793.5 100% 3.2.2 Issues & Opportunities Lake Water Quality. Both Lake Minnewashta and Lake St. Joe are deep lakes with good water quality. The City will continue to undertake BMPs as opportunities arise and will work with residents and other stakeholders to undertake improvements to help preserve this water quality. Aquatic Invasive Species. Lake Minnewashta has been infested with Eurasian watermilfoil, curlyleaf pondweed and zebra mussels. There are partnership opportunities with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the Lake Minnewashta Preservation Association continue to monitor any impacts or trends related to the zebra mussel infestation and other invasive species. Page | 3-6 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory Figure 3.3. Lake Minnewashta subwatershed. Page | 3-7 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory 3.3 LAKE LUCY SUBWATERSHED 3.3.1 Subwatershed Characteristics The Lake Lucy subwatershed (Figure 3.4) is located in the north-central part of the city. Land use in the subwatershed (Table 3.4) consists almost entirely of single family residential parcels and associated road right of way. Some large-lot residential is present. Pheasant Hills Park is the largest park in the subwatershed. Runoff from the upper subwatershed is collected in a series of ponds and flows through storm sewer along Lake Lucy Road to Lake Lucy. The upper watershed has two main collection systems, south along Galpin and east along Lake Lucy Road, the other flows from 63rd street to the wetland system south of Lake Lucy Lane. Wetlands and open space dominate the lower subwatershed. Lake Lucy outlets into Lake Ann by a short channel. Figure 3.4. Lake Lucy subwatershed. Page | 3-8 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory Table 3.4. Lake Lucy subwatershed 2010 land use. Land Use Area (ac) Percent Residential Low Density 625.9 73% Right Of Way 88.2 10% Residential Large Lot 74.2 9% Parks Open Space 60.5 7% Public Semi Public 6.8 1% Residential Medium Density 2.6 <1% 858.2 100% 3.3.2 Issues & Opportunities Potential Street Flooding. Modeling suggested a possibility of pond P-LU 3-4 overtopping Manchester Drive during a 100-year event. However, during the June 2014 wet period no flooding was observed. This location will continue to be monitored during large rain events. Lake Water Quality. Lake Lucy is considered to be a shallow lake and its water quality hovers near the state’s shallow lake standards for nutrient concentration. Section 3.3.2 of the Plan describes the findings of a UAA for Lake Lucy and Lake Ann. Several potential actions were identified to improve water quality in Lake Lucy, including potential phosphorus load reductions in the watershed, a potential alum treatment to reduce nutrient loading from the sediments, and management of invasive aquatic vegetation in the lake. The City will continue to work with the RPBCWD to partner on potential improvement projects and will continue to undertake BMPs as opportunities arise. Page | 3-9 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory 3.4 LAKE ANN SUBWATERSHED 3.4.1 Subwatershed Characteristics The Lake Ann direct subwatershed (Figure 3.5) is a small drainage area that flows overland directly to the lake. Lake Lucy flows into Lake Ann through a small channel on the north side of the lake. Land use is primarily parks and open space and public/semi-public uses (Table 3.5). The Temple of Eck owns a substantial amount of open space. The outlet of Lake Ann is the headwaters of Riley Creek. Figure 3.5. Lake Ann subwatershed. Table 3.5. Lake Ann subwatershed 2010 land use. Land Use Area (ac) Percent Public Semi Public 40.5 30% Residential Low Density 38.0 28% Parks Open Space 36.2 27% Residential Medium Density 17.8 13% Residential High Density 1.1 1% Right Of Way 0.9 1% 134.6 100% Page | 3-10 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory 3.4.2 Issues & Opportunities Lake Water Quality. The water quality in Lake Ann currently is better than the state’s standard. However, the lake does experience occasional blue-green algal blooms, Section 3.3.2 of the Plan describes the findings of a UAA for Lake Lucy and Lake Ann. As the water quality in outflow from Lake Lucy can affect water quality in Lake Ann, improvements to Lake Lucy will help to protect Lake Ann. The City will continue to work with the RPBCWD to partner on potential improvement projects and will continue to undertake BMPs as opportunities arise. Page | 3-11 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory 3.5 LAKE SUSAN SUBWATERSHED 3.5.1 Subwatershed Characteristics The Lake Susan subwatershed includes part of the City’s commercial/industrial core (Table 3.6) as well as parks and open space. There are five major subdrainage systems in the subwatershed (Figure 3.6). Riley Creek drains the upper subwatershed. The area west of Karber Boulevard and north of Santa Vera Drive flows through wetlands and channels southeast to Riley Creek. Drainage from the area south of Highway 5 is collected in storm sewer and ponds which are routed into Riley Creek. The southern part of the subwatershed flows into a large wetland complex in the Lake Susan Preserve (LS 2-3), which flows to Lake Susan. Commercial and industrial land uses in the vicinity of Highway 5 and Highway 101 are routed to a large pond (LS 3-1) west of Lake Susan Park. Residential development around the lake flows overland to the lake. Lake Susan outlets into Riley Creek, which then flows to Rice Marsh Lake. Table 3.6. Lake Susan subwatershed 2010 land use. Land Use Area (ac) Percent Office Industrial 270.0 21% Right Of Way 219.5 17% Parks Open Space 197.2 15% Residential Low Density 196.6 15% Commercial 138.3 11% Public Semi Public 82.0 6% Residential High Density 62.7 5% Office 38.1 3% Residential Medium Density 37.7 3% Agriculture 26.6 2% Residential Large Lot 20.7 2% Mixed 6.2 <1% 1,295.5 100% 3.5.2 Issues & Opportunities Lake Water Quality. Lake Susan is a shallow lake that has poor water quality. Water clarity has improved in the past several years, possibly in response to the reduction of a large population of carp to more manageable levels, and to treatment of the invasive curly-leaf pondweed. A Use Attainability Assessment completed in 2013 reviewed potential options for improving water quality. In 2016 the RPBCWD and City partnered to contract a spent lime treatment system to treat discharge from the wetland complex in the Lake Susan Preserve. The RPBCWD is currently evaluating the feasibility of a whole-lake alum treatment for Susan as well as other BMPs identified in the UAA. A partnership project with RPBCWD to install pump and treatment device to withdraw water from Lake Susan Pond to irrigate Lake Susan Park is included in the CIP and Implementation Plan in 2017. The City will continue to work with the RPBCWD to partner on potential improvement projects and will continue to undertake BMPs as opportunities arise. A project to stabilize a segment of Riley Creek adjacent to the City’s Public Works Faciality is in the CIP and Implementation Plan in 2019. This project will reduce sediment and nutrient load in the creek and conveyed to Lake Susan. Page | 3-12 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory Figure 3.6. Lake Susan subwatershed. Page | 3-13 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory 3.6 RICE MARSH LAKE SUBWATERSHED 3.6.1 Subwatershed Characteristics Rice Marsh Lake straddles the boundary of Chanhassen and Eden Prairie, and its lakeshed encompasses land in both cities. Within Chanhassen the Rice Marsh Lake subwatershed (Figure 3.7) has two distinct land uses. North of Highway 5 and at the southeast quadrant of Highway 5 and Great Plains Boulevard is highly impervious commercial property (Table 3.7). Single-family and medium density residential lies between Highway 5 and Highway 212. Wide riparian wetlands and wooded areas surround Rice Marsh Lake Park, which extends into Eden Prairie. Lake Susan to the west outlets into Rice Marsh Lake via Riley Creek. Rice Marsh outlets via Riley Creek in Eden Prairie, where it flows into Lake Riley. A winter aeration system is operated on the lake to support the bluegill population that keep invasive carp in check. Table 3.7. Rice Marsh Lake subwatershed 2010 land use. Land Use Area (ac) Percent Residential Low Density 190.8 27% Right Of Way 139.4 19% Parks Open Space 101.2 14% Commercial 96.3 13% Mixed 58.8 8% Residential Medium Density 51.7 7% Public Semi Public 38.2 5% Residential High Density 20.1 3% Office Industrial 18.5 3% 715.0 100% 3.6.2 Issues & Opportunities Potential Flooding. Modeling identifies potential flooding issues in RM 3-3. Private ponds have the potential to overflow onto private property. Lake Water Quality. Water quality and clarity has improved in Rich Marsh Lake since the 1970s, when wastewater treatment plant effluent was discharged into the lake. However, it is still classified as an Impaired Water and does not meet nutrient standards for a shallow lake. At an average depth of only five feet, sediment cores suggest that it has always been a eutrophic lake A UAA was completed in 2016 to evaluate conditions and identify options for improvement. Modeling suggests that excess nutrients in Rice Marsh Lake are contributed from the watershed, from outflow of Lake Susan conveyed by Riley Creek, and from internal sediment release. Recommended strategies include increasing water quality treatment in the watershed, improving water quality in Lake Susan, and applying alum to the lake to seal sediments and reduce phosphorus release. A partnership project with RPBCWD to install an iron-enhanced sand filter within Rice Marsh Park is included in the CIP and Implementation Plan in 2019. The City will continue to work with the RPBCWD to partner on potential improvement projects and will continue to undertake BMPs as opportunities arise. Page | 3-14 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory Figure 3.7. Rice Marsh Lake subwatershed. Page | 3-15 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory 3.7 LAKE RILEY SUBWATERSHED 3.7.1 Subwatershed Characteristics Lake Riley straddles the Chanhassen/Eden Prairie border and its lakeshed encompasses land in both cities. Rice Marsh Lake to the north outlets into Lake Riley through Riley Creek in Eden Prairie. Within Chanhassen the Lake Riley subwatershed (Figure 3.8) is comprised of mainly large-lot and low density residential uses (Table 3.8), with a significant amount of Highway 212 right of way. The outlet of Lake Riley, which is in the city of Eden Prairie, is Riley Creek, which flows down the Minnesota River bluff to Grass Lake and then to the river. Table 3.8. Lake Riley subwatershed 2010 land use. Land Use Area (ac) Percent Residential Low Density 363.5 44% Residential Large Lot 189.7 23% Right Of Way 141.2 17% Residential High Density 49.6 6% Mixed 41.8 5% Parks Open Space 41.7 5% Residential Medium Density 0.2 <1% 827.6 100% 3.7.2 Issues & Opportunities Potential Flooding. Modeling identifies potential flooding issues. Modeling predicts an overtopping possibility for a pond in LR 3-2 at Lake Riley Boulevard and Lyman Boulevard. This is a location that is known to experience street flooding during large rain events. Street flooding was observed during the October 2014 25-year rain event. City staff regularly check this location during rain events. Modeling also predicts that a wetland just to the north of Lyman Boulevard could possibly overtop. This location is checked periodically by City staff as well. Lake Water Quality. Water quality in Lake Riley hovers around the deep lake standards for recreation in Minnesota. A UAA was completed in 2016 to evaluate conditions and identify options for improvement. Recommended strategies include increasing water quality treatment in the watershed, improving water quality in upstream Lake Susan and Rice Marsh Lake, and applying alum to the lake to seal sediments and reduce phosphorus release. The RPBCWD applied an alum treatment to Lake Riley in 2016, which brought an immediate improvement in lake water quality and clarity as well as an improvement in native aquatic vegetation abundance. The lake has also been treated for invasive curly-leaf pondweed and Eurasian watermilfoil and will continue to be spot treated as necessary. The City will continue to work with the RPBCWD to partner on potential improvement projects and will continue to undertake BMPs as opportunities arise. Page | 3-16 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory Figure 3.8. Lake Riley subwatershed. Page | 3-17 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory 3.8 BLUFF CREEK SUBWATERSHED 3.8.1 Subwatershed Characteristics The Bluff Creek subwatershed is the largest in Chanhassen, draining almost 4,200 acres. The Creek rises in a large wetland complex in subwatershed BC 2-1. In general, stormwater from the central core of the city is collected in a series of storm sewers and ponds which are discharged in the Creek. The lower subwatershed is less developed than the upper subwatershed. Below Highway 212, runoff is conveyed down the bluff through a series of ravines. Table 3.9. Bluff Creek subwatershed 2010 land use. Land Use Area (ac) Percent Residential Low Density 1,370.3 33% Right Of Way 632.7 15% Parks Open Space 446.7 11% Office Industrial 427.5 10% Residential Large Lot 319.0 8% Residential Medium Density 274.0 7% Agriculture 213.7 5% Public Semi Public 169.0 4% Office 145.6 3% Residential High Density 94.9 2% Commercial 86.0 2% Mixed 9.0 <1% Total 4,188.5 100% 3.8.2 Issues & Opportunities Water Quality and Biotic Integrity TMDL. As discussed in Section 2.1.3 of this Plan, a turbidity and fish biota TMDL was completed in 2013 to diagnose pollutant sources and biotic stressors and identify implementation actions. The TMDL found that the source of excess TSS was both watershed load and also sediment contributed from streambank and gully erosion, especially downstream of Pioneer Trail, during high flow events. Excess turbidity from TSS load was also identified as one of the primary stressors to the fish community. A stream and gully assessment downstream of Pioneer Trail evaluated conditions rated the severity of erosion. In 2014 the City completed the stabilization of Ravine 2. Habitat fragmentation was also identified as a stressor, singling out the large drop at the regional trail crossing culvert. A project to stabilize the stream at this location and create a fish passage was proposed for 2017, but the City and RPBCWD were unable to secure a required easement form the landowner. An additional project is included in the City’s CIP and Implementation plan for 2019 to add volume reduction and rate control BMPs in the subwatershed. Stream Condition. In 2017 the RPBCWD developed its Creek Restoration Action Strategy (CRAS) to help guide future actions to protect and improve Bluff Creek as well as other major streams in that watershed. The CRAS combines stream physical condition and stability, water quality, and other attributes into a classification and prioritization system. Four segments on Bluff Creek and one on a tributary were rated as “severe,” with poor water quality, unstable banks experiencing erosion and mass wasting, and limited habitat. Page | 3-18 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory Figure 3.9. Bluff Creek subwatershed. Page | 3-19 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory 3.9 LOWER MINNESOTA SUBWATERSHED 3.9.1 Subwatershed Characteristics The Lower Minnesota subwatershed (Figure 3.10) is low-density, with grasslands, wetlands, some agriculture, and large-lot residential development (Table 3.10). This subwatershed includes Assumption Creek, a designated trout stream, and Seminary Fen and the Seminary Fen Scientific and Natural Area. Figure 3.10. Lower Minnesota River subwatershed. Page | 3-20 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory Table 3.10. Lower Minnesota River subwatershed 2010 land use. Land Use Area (ac) Percent Agriculture 655.0 51% Residential Large Lot 340.4 27% Office 153.5 12% Right Of Way 88.6 7% Office Industrial 38.0 3% Residential Low Density 5.9 0% Total 1,281.5 100% 3.9.2 Issues & Opportunities Seminary Fen. The City participates in the Seminary Fen Work Group with Chaska and the Met Council, which meets periodically to discuss the impacts of groundwater pumping on this rare, protected resource. Page | 3-21 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory 3.10 DRAINAGE TO NEIGHBORING COMMUNITIES 3.10.1 Subwatershed Characteristics There are a number of small subwatersheds that flow to receiving waters in adjacent cities. Within the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, portions of Chanhassen discharge to Lake Virginia, Lake Galpin, and Christmas Lake. Land use in those subwatersheds is almost entirely single-family residential, wetland, or park. Within the RPBCWD, portions of residential areas in Chanhassen are tributary to Silver Lake or Purgatory Creek. The commercial/industrial district at Highway 5 west of Dell Road is tributary to Mitchell Lake in Eden Prairie. Some areas within the Landscape Arboretum and a mixed-use area in the vicinity of Galpin and Lyman Boulevards drain to Lake Hazeltine in the Carver WMO. Figure 3.11. Drainage to neighboring communities. Page | 3-22 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory 3.10.2 Issues & Opportunities Lake Virginia Tributary Area. The outlet of Lake Minnewashta, a channel to Lake Virginia, flows under several driveways that are undersized for large events. No information is available regarding potential flooding or other issues that may arise. Purgatory Creek Tributary Area. A ravine north of Fox Hollow Drive, west of Fox Drive in PC 2-2 that discharges into the pond at Fox Hollow Drive and Highway 101 needs stabilization. Christmas Lake. The headwaters of Christmas Creek are in Curry Farms Park. The park did experience some flooding in June 2014. Christmas Creek downstream of Powers Boulevard is in need of stabilization. Page | 4-1 REVIEW DRAFT Appendix A Land and Water Resources Inventory 4.0 References Barr. 2010. Bluff Creek TMDL Biological Stressor Identification. pca.state.mn.us/index.php/view- document.html?gid=13751. Barr. 2013a. Bluff Creek Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load Report: Turbidity and Fish Bioassessment Impairments. pca.state.mn.us/index.php/view-document.html?gid=19684. Barr. 2013b. Lake Lucy and Lake Ann Use Attainability Analysis Update. rpbcwd.org/files/7213/8426/4821/LakeLucy_LakeAnn_UAAUpdate_September2013_FINAL.pdf. Bass. 2013c. Lake Susan Use Attainability Analysis Update. rpbcwd.org/index.php/download_file/128/209/ Barr. 2016. Rice Marsh Lake and Lake Riley: Use Attainability Analysis Update. rpbcwd.org/index.php/download_file/714/209/ Barr. 2017. Creek Restoration Action Strategy (CRAS) 2017 Report. rpbcwd.org/index.php/download_file/1020/197/. Barr. 2017. Lotus, Silver, Duck, Round, Mitchell, Red Rock Use Attainability Analysis Update; Lake Idlewild and Staring Lake Use Attainability Analysis; and Lower Purgatory Creek Stabilization Study. rpbcwd.org/index.php/download_file/952/200/ Lusardi, B. 2009. Plate 3 - Surficial Geology. Minnesota Geological Survey, County Atlas Series, Atlas C- 21, Part A. Minnesota DNR. 2017. Lake Finder. dnr.state.mn.us/lakefind/index.html Minnesota DNR. 2017. Minnesota Biological Survey Native Plant Community and Rare Species County Maps. dnr.state.mn.us/eco/mcbs/maps.html Minnesota Geospatial Commons. 2017. gisdata.mn.gov/ Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. 2017. Environmental Data Application. pca.state.mn.us/data/surface-water-and-stormwater-data Mossler, and V.W. Chandler. 2009. Plate 2 - Bedrock Geology. Minnesota Geological Survey, County Atlas Series, Atlas C-21, Part A. dnr.state.mn.us/waters/programs/gw_section/mapping/platesum/carvcga.html NOAA National Climatic Data Center. 2014. 1981-2010 Normals Data Access. www.ncdc.noaa.gov/land- based-station-data/climate-normals/1981-2010-normals-data Ramstack Hobbs, J.M. and M.B. Edlund. 2014. Historical water quality and ecological change in Rice Marsh Lake. Final report submitted to Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District. St. Croix Watershed Research Station, Science Museum of Minnesota, Marine on St. Croix, Minnesota, 55047. rpbcwd.org/index.php/download_file/418/209/ USDA NRCS. 2016. Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) Data Base. www.lib.ncsu.edu/gis/nrcs.html Appendix B HydroCAD Modelling Results This technical document is available separately [This page is intentionally blank for printing] NORTH DAKOTA Fargo 701-297-9600 Mandan 701-751-3370 COLORADO Denver 800-472-2232 Ft. Collins 970-223-4705 GEORGIA Roswell 678-987-5840 WYOMING Cheyenne 307-634-7848 Sheridan 307-675-1148 WENCK 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Maple Plain, MN 55359 MINNESOTA Golden Valley 763-252-6800 Woodbury 651-294-4580 Windom 507-831-2703 New Hope 763-489-7400 wenck.com TAZ House Pop Employ House Pop Employ House Pop Employ 375 540 1,539 270 555 1,543 297 573 1,593 327 376 423 1,176 332 470 1,283 350 493 1,331 370 377 192 518 1,170 218 512 1,287 398 931 1,416 382 13 34 485 13 34 598 13 34 951 383 35 90 0 218 569 0 398 1,043 0 384 145 416 26 300 918 51 721 1,702 70 385 513 1,347 8 801 1,972 54 891 2,155 54 386 155 426 69 540 1,385 251 695 1,799 384 387 753 1,987 167 1,046 2,697 1,972 1,100 2,707 2,575 388 652 1,569 2,200 688 2,143 1,750 906 2,087 1,690 389 392 1,074 1,258 392 1,047 2,577 392 1,019 2,600 390 1,080 3,863 352 1,100 3,871 218 1,377 4,071 398 391 1,118 3,102 124 1,456 3,872 134 1,948 6,474 172 392 634 1,399 1,644 663 1,476 1,680 600 1,488 1,554 393 823 1,786 564 830 1,895 572 830 1,895 577 394 1,893 4,521 2,650 1,960 4,604 2,342 2,000 4,856 2,360 395 639 1,853 0 650 1,879 0 665 1,915 0 962 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1657 0 0 1,489 0 0 1,294 0 0 1,054 1678 0 0 1,192 0 0 1,073 0 0 1,048 TOTALS 10,000 26,700 14,000 11,900 31,700 16,500 14,000 37,100 17,600 MC 10,000 26,700 14,000 11,900 31,700 16,500 14,000 37,100 17,600 2020 2030 2040 City of Chanhassen Local Water Management Plan Update April 3, 2018 City of Chanhassen Local Surface Water Management Plan Update City Council May 2, 2018 ___________________________________________ What is it? A document that sets forth the City’s goals, policies, and actions to manage stormwater and protect and improve water resources in the city. Your role? The City Council reviews, approves, and adopts the Local Surface Water Management Plan (Plan). The Draft Plan can be found on the front page of the City website under City News. http://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/CivicAlerts.aspx?AID=402 Why do this? The update is required by State Statute, completed every 10 years or completed within two years following the update of a watershed management plan. In addition, it is good and responsible infrastructure and resource management and stewardship. The current Plan expired in 2016 What is in it? Contains three major sections: an inventory, goals and policies, and an Implementation Plan. 1) Inventory • Inventory of physical environment and water resources • Updated stormwater modeling • Condition assessment: water quality, stream conditions, pond inventory, wetland data • Information from other studies or reports o TMDLs, Use Attainability Analyses o Watershed District requirements o NPDES - stormwater permit requirements o Wetland inventory o Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resources Management Plan o Wellhead protection plan o Other agency requirements 2) Goals and Policies • Holistic water management – stormwater, lakes and streams, wetlands, groundwater 3) Implementation Plan City of Chanhassen Local Water Management Plan Update April 3, 2018 • Programs, including education and outreach program • Capital projects • Maintenance actions • Ordinance revisions • Assessment of adequacy of funding What is the timeline? Feb 1 = Begin 60 day comment period for the four Watershed Management Organizations (WMO’s) and 45 day comment period Met Council and two Counties March 19 = End 45 day comment period for Met Council March 15 = Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District requests comment period extension May 4 = End comment period for WMO (extension granted) ???? = Comment response and negotiation period with WMO’s. The WMO comment response/negotiation period is undefined in State statute. It ends when WMO’s are willing to approve LWMP ???? = Begin 120 day adoption and implementation period of LWMP by City. Date dependent on WMO Plan approval. ???? = Begin 180 day standards and ordinances amendment period. Date dependent on WMO Plan approval. We are here Name Approval Status Requirement SectionNancy Madsen NAMet Council NA Lower Minnesota River Watershed District (LMRWD)Approval Lower Minnesota River Watershed District (LMRWD)Lower Minnesota River Watershed District (LMRWD)Lower Minnesota River Watershed District (LMRWD)I was looking at the Local Stormwater Management Plan draft and noticed the map for the Watershed Management Organization should be updated if a new one is available. Please note 212 at the bottom of the map is now 61. The new Hwy 212 is not labeled. All the other maps I looked at appear to be updated and have the new 212 in the appropriate spot. Thanks for all the work you do.1. Flooding Problem Areas (District Plan Table 2-1), Old 212 near Moon Valley Gravel Pit. This issue is not identified or addressed in the LWMP. If this location is not in the City of Chanhassen (City), include a statement in the LWMP saying the City does not have any flooding problem areas that were addressed in the District Plan.2. Plan Goal 2, Surface Water Management. These criteria should be included in the LWMP or specifically referenced:a. Strategy 2.2.2: Promote disconnected stormwater management. Include information about how the City will incorporate disconnected stormwater- management practices into its future stormwater-management plans.b. Strategies 2.2.3 and 2.2.4: Cost Share Incentive Program and Water Quality Restoration Program. Implementation of these programs is the District’s responsibility. However, the City should reference them in its LWMP.c. Strategy 2.3.3: Complete detailed assessments of data. Include information in the LWMP about how the City assesses data and uses it to develop goals, policies, or strategies.3. Plan Goal 4, Unique Natural Resources Management. These criteria should be included in the LWMP or specifically referenced: a. Strategy 4.2.1: Data acquisition and management. Include information about the City’s strategy for acquiring and managing data related to the protection, education, and monitoring of unique natural resources.b. Strategy 4.2.2: Provide technical assistance. Provide information about how the City assists nongovernment organizations and landowners interested in preserving unique natural resources.c. Strategy 4.4.1: Encourage wildlife connectivity projects. Provide information about how the City will encourage wildlife connectivity projects that will achieve multiple goals, such as water quality improvements and fen and bluff protection.Contingent approval based on satisfactory responses to commentsThe Metropolitan Council (Council) has completed its review of the City of Chanhassen' s draft Local Water Management Plan (plan), submitted in February 2018. The plan is consistent with Council policies and the Council's Water Resources Policy Plan.The plan's water resource inventory is based on hydrologic and hydraulic modeling of the City on. a subwatershed basis and includes issues and opportunities for each subwatershed. Overall, the plan provides an excellent framework to manage the City's water resources. However, we do have two minor comments on the plan:In Table 5-3, Chanhassen LW.MP Implementation Plan 2018-2027 byyear, the capital improvement section covers 2018 through 2022. The columns for years 2023 through 2027 are blank with a note stating,"ToBe Determined In Future Annual GIP Updates." The city could consider extending this table to cover the total period of the plan. We realize it is difficult to estimate revenue and expenditures this far out, and that City budgets are reviewed annually, but technically this is required in the plan.As stated in the plan, all the Watershed Management Organizations (WMOs) the city is in are currently updating their management plans.The city should consider updating this plan after the WMO plan updates have been completed.Draft Local Surface Water Management Plan CommentsComment Lower Minnesota River Watershed District (LMRWD)Lower Minnesota River Watershed District (LMRWD)Lower Minnesota River Watershed District (LMRWD)Lower Minnesota River Watershed District (LMRWD)Lower Minnesota River Watershed District (LMRWD)Lower Minnesota River Watershed District (LMRWD)Lower Minnesota River Watershed District (LMRWD)Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD)Not ApprovedMinnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD)Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD)Data and Information 1. An executive summary stating highlights of the local water plan.Meets requirementsMinnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD)Data and Information 2. Identify MCWD data systems in the local plan and describe their application to LGU activity in order for the District to ensure that the LGU is aware of these systems and that they are being used for common intended purposes.Does not meet requirements. Not included.Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD)Data and Information 3. A summary of water resource management-related agreements, including joint powers agreements, into which the LGU has entered with watershed management organizations, adjoining LGUs, private parties or others.Partially meets requirements. Section 2.5 does not reference the 1996 Cooperative Agreement with MCWD regarding regulatory responsibilities (attached).Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD)Data and Information 4. Maps of current land use and land use at the LGU planning horizon.Meets requirementsMinnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD)Data and Information 5. Maps of drainage areas under current and future planned land use with paths, rates and volumes of stormwater runoff.Does not meet requirements. Appendix A includes subwatershed maps that show flow paths. Information on rates and volumes of stormwater runoff is not provided. If this is included in Appendix B, please provide a copy to the District.Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD)Data and Information 6. A stormwater conveyance map meeting standards of the current MS4 general permit and indicating an outfall or a connection at the LGU boundary.Does not meet requirements. Not included.Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD)Data and Information7. An inventory of public and private stormwater management facilities including the location, facility type and party responsible for maintenance (e.g., landowner, homeowner’s association, LGU, other third party).Does not meet requirements. Not included.Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD)Data and Information 8. A listing and summary of existing or potential water resource-related problems wholly or partly within LGU corporate limits. A problem assessment consistent with Minnesota Rules 8410.0045, subpart 7, is to be completed for each. This includes but is not limited to:Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD)Data and Information a. Areas of present or potential future local flooding.4. Plan Goal 7, Erosion and Sediment Control. These criteria should be included in the LWMP or specifically referenced:a. Strategy 7.2.1: Develop a vegetation management standard/plan. The City will be developing a Vegetation Management Plan as part of its Stormwater Inventory Inspection and Maintenance Plan. Development of the vegetation management plan should be included in the LWMP as a policy.b. Strategy 7.3.1: Continue work of addressing gully erosion. The LWMP should be modified to include language referring to gully restoration in the City. Two projects are mentioned in Table 5.2 of the LWMP.c. Strategy 7.4.1: Promote and encourage shoreland protection. The LWMP states that City Code includes shoreland management district ordinances. This information should be included in the LWMP as policies or goals.5. Plan Goal 8, Strategy 8.1.1: Promote safety education. Include information in the LWMP about how the City promotes safety education in its effort to promote the co-existence of commercial and recreational navigation on the Lower Minnesota River.Meets requirements6. Plan Goal 9, Strategy 9.1.2: Develop an outreach program. The LWMP states that an education and outreach plan will be developed to achieve the City’s long-term public education goals. This should be included as a goal or policy in the LWMP.7. Policy 2.2, Strategy 2.2.1:a. Shoreline and Streambank Alteration Standard. The District’s Shoreline and Streambank Alteration Standard is not addressed in the LWMP. The LWMP should include or reference this standard.b. Stream and Lake Crossing Standard. The District’s Stream and Lake Crossing Standard is not addressed in the LWMP. The LWMP should include or reference this standard. c. Floodplain and Drainage Alteration Standard. The District’s Floodplain Alteration Standard is not addressed in the LWMP. The LWMP should include or reference this standard.d. Water Appropriations Standard. The District’s Water Appropriations Standard is not addressed in the LWMP. The LWMP should include or reference this standard.e. The District’s Bluff Standard is not fully addressed in the LWMP. The Bluff Standard Regulation and Criteria A, A-a, A-c, A-d, B, B-a.i.1, B-a.i.2, and C of the District standard should be discussed in relation to the City’s bluff protection efforts.8. Cost Share Incentive Program (District Plan Table 4-3), Bluff Creek Erosion Repair. The Lower Bluff Creek TMDL (total maximum daily load) Implementation Project is listed in the City’s Capital Improvement Project (CIP) table. Does it encompass the District’s Bluff Creek Erosion Repair Project? If not, the project should be identified and addressed in the LWMP.9. Capital Improvement Projects (District Plan Table 4-4), Bluff Creek Restoration. The Lower Bluff Creek TMDL Implementation Project is listed in the City’s CIP table. Does it encompass the District’s Bluff Creek Restoration Project? If not, the project should be identified and addressed in the LWMP.The City should be commended for actively participating in the District’s Plan amendment process as a member of the Technical Advisory Commission, acknowledging regulatory changes underway and providing a strategy for addressing those changes in the future. As stated in the LWMP: The City will undertake these ordinance revisions within six months after adoption of this Plan. It is expected that where the requirements of the individual watershed distracts differ, the City will adopt the most stringent of the requirements for application citywide. The most stringent requirements the City will adopt are highlighted in Table 5.1.It is evident that the City has devoted time and effort into creating a high quality set of goals and policies that will provide a strong foundation for protecting the quality of water resources in the City. District staff encourage a meeting to discuss how MCWD can add value to the City’s planning processes.Incomplete pending resolution of issues identified. MCWD is requesting the City to revise the LWMP and resubmit for MCWD approval. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD)Data and Information b. Landlocked areas.Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD)Data and Information c. Regional storage needs.Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD)Data and Information 9. A statement of the process to amend the local plan, consistent with Minnesota Statutes §103B.235.Meets requirementsMinnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD)LGU Housekeeping 10. Inventory of real property owned by the LGU, including discussion of (i) water resource issues and opportunities associated with its properties, and (ii) potential opportunities to coordinate with the District or other partners.Does not meet requirements. Not included.Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD)LGU Housekeeping 11. Incorporates the inventory and description of practices from its SWPPP regarding facilities that it owns or operates and municipal operations that may contribute pollutants to groundwater or surface waters.Meets requirementsMinnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD)LGU Housekeeping 12. Include map and inventory of stormwater management facilities, including responsible party and maintenance condition and schedule.Does not meet requirements. Not included.Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD)LGU Housekeeping 13. A description of the LGU’s approach to maintenance of stormwater management practices constructed in conjunction with private development.Does not meet requirements. Not included.Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD)LGU Housekeeping 14. Information related to the issue of deferred maintenance of public and private stormwater management practices, to inform a cooperative approach to addressing the issue (optional).Optional. Not included.Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD)Land Use Planning and Development Regulation15. Identify those areas within or adjacent to the LGU that the LGU has designated in its CLUP for potential development or redevelopment within the CLUP planning horizon. This includes planned rezoning, land assembly, and infrastructure extension or expansion.Meets requirements. Section 1.3.2 provides a brief summary of expected land use change. Please confirm that no significant development or redevelopment activity is anticipated within the MCWD.Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD)Land Use Planning and Development Regulation16. List and describe completed or programmed small area plans and similar planning activities to assess the LGU’s role with respect to defined-area redevelopment.See #15Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD)Land Use Planning and Development Regulation17. Describe the procedures by which the LGU plans, programs and implements each of the following: Transportation infrastructure, Sewer and water infrastructure, Park and recreation land acquisition and management, Conservation land acquisition and management, The description should include the date of the most recent approved capital implementation or land acquisition and management program, the frequency of program updating, the internal procedures to develop and approve the implementation program and to implement specific actions, and how programming and implementation is coordinated with other LGU activities.Does not meet requirements. Not included.Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD)Land Use Planning and Development Regulation18. Provide links to small area/redevelopment plans, capital implementation programs, and land acquisition and management plans listed pursuant to items 16 and 17.Meets requirements. Capital improvement program is provided. Please provide links to other plans, if applicable.Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD)Land Use Planning and Development Regulation19. Evaluation of LGU’s official controls with respect to the integration of water resource and conservation protection.Partially meets requirements. Policy 2.10 references low-impact development requirements. Please consider and respond to the other recommendations listed in Section 3.2 of the District Plan.Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD)Land Use Planning and Development Regulation20. Identify other regulatory mandates concerning water resources under which the LGU operates, including LGU’s role, responsibility, and compliance status.Meets requirementsMinnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD)Implementation Program 21. Contains an implementation program, consistent with MN Rules 8410.0160.Does not meet requirements. Please address the Met Council’s comment: “In Table 5-3, Chanhassen LWMP Implementation Plan 2018-2027 by year, the capital improvement section covers 2018 through 2022. The columns for years 2023 through 2027 are blank with a note stating, "To Be Determined In Future Annual CIP Updates." The city could consider extending this table to cover the total period of the plan. We realize it is difficult to estimate revenue and expenditures this far out, and that City budgets are reviewed annually, but technically this is required in the plan.”Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD)LGU/District Coordination Plan22. Sets forth a coordination plan that connects the LGU and District in ways that efficiently provide for timely coordination.Does not meet requirements. Not included.Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD)Water Resource Official Controls23. Identify any District rules for which the LGU wishes to assume sole regulatory authority, and provide the supplementary information required under Section 3.6.4 of the WMP.Does not meet requirements. The plan indicates that the City wishes to retain sole regulatory authority for stormwater, wetlands, floodplain, and erosion control and includes the standards that the City intends to adopt within 6 months of plan adoption. Approval of the LWMP will be contingent on the adoption of these ordinances. The plan must describe the LGU’s technical expertise and the protocols described in Section 3.6.4 of the District Plan.Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD)Water Resource Official Controls24. State whether the LGU intends to assume the role of “local government unit" responsible to implement the Minnesota Wetlands Conservation Act (WCA) or whether it chooses for the District to assume that role.Meets requirementsCarver County Watershed Management Organization (CCWMO)Approval Specific comments on the plan are described below Carver County Watershed Management Organization (CCWMO)Carver County Watershed Management Organization (CCWMO)GOVERNANCECarver County Watershed Management Organization (CCWMO)GOVERNANCECarver County Watershed Management Organization (CCWMO)GROUNDWATERCarver County Watershed Management Organization (CCWMO)EDUCATIONCarver County Watershed Management Organization (CCWMO)PROJECTSCarver County Watershed Management Organization (CCWMO)2006 PLAN EVALUATIONRiley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD)UnknownThe Carver County Watershed Management Organization (CCWMO) has reviewed the City of Chanhassen’s updated Surface Water Management Plan (Plan) dated February 2018. The CCWMO finds the Plan generally follows with the issue areas and policy direction laid out in the CCWMO’s Watershed Management Plan as well as the general requirements of Minnesota Statutes 103B.235 and Minnesota Rules Chapter 8410. Boundary - The watershed boundary between the CCWMO and the MCWD and RPBCWD was adjusted as of October 2017. The following sections of the plan should be updated to reflect this adjustment: Figure 2.1 (p. 2-5)Figure 2.1 (p. 2-2 of Appendix A) Table 2.1 (p 2-1 of Appendix A)Regulation - Clarification or changes to describing CCWMO regulation are needed to the following sections:Regulatory Responsibility (p.4-6) states that the CCWMO “reviews” land altering activities. The language should be updated to read “reviews and permits”.Regulatory Responsibility (p.4-6) states that Carver County has regulatory authority over groundwater issues within the City. While the County has an adopted Groundwater Plan, it does not have regulatory authority over groundwater.Table 4.3 (p.4-6) indicates that the CCWMO has an MOU with the city for Erosion Prevention & Sediment Control, Floodplain Management, and Stormwater Management. No such MOU exists. The plan should either revise this text or indicate that it is the intent to create such an MOU.Table 5.1 (p.5-2) minor corrections to CCWMO column:Create 1> acre of impervious or >10,000 sf in sensitive areas 90% removal of TP and TSS from the 1.05” eventAbstraction of 1.0” runoff from impervious surface (0.5” if site is co nstrained) The County adopted a Groundwater Plan in 2016. This plan could be referenced in the City’s Plan in several locations including:Section 1.3Section 4.1Section 5.4The Plan should include more references to collaboration with the County on education efforts to improve efficiency and reduce duplication of efforts. Suggestions include:Table 3.2 (p. 3.4) add opportunity to collaborate with the County to reduce duplication of efforts5.2.1 (p. 5-5) reference County programsTable 5.4 (p.5-12) add coordination and collaboration with the County.A portion of the City drains to Lake Hazeltine in the CCWMO which is impaired. An opportunity to enhance and restore a wetland exists in this drainage area. The CCWMO requests that this project be added to the LWMP. This could be indicated in the following sections:Table 5.3 (p.5-10)Section 3.10.2 in Appendix AThe plan should also include an evaluation of the 2006 Plan for areas that impact the CCWMO. The evaluation should describe the progress made towards implementing the plan.Extension requested until May 4th, 2018 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, May 14, 2018 Subject Franchise Fee Update Section 5:30 P.M. WORK SESSION TO BE HELD IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS Item No: A.2. Prepared By Greg Sticha, Finance Director File No: PW415(?) BACKGROUND At the end of 2017, city council directed staff to gather feedback from the community on the possibility of implementing a franchise fee and eliminating special assessments for the funding of our local street pavement management program. Staff did this by taking public input via email, from the city’s website/request tracker, social media and by holding two open houses over the past couple of months. This evening staff would like to share the input we received from the public. Staff will also be looking for direction from the city council on the next steps in order to achieve the funding needed for our local street pavement management program. Open houses held February 8, 2018 & April 10, 2018 The first goal of the open houses was to inform the public on the need for additional funding for our local street pavement management program in order to maintain our streets at or near the current pavement condition levels. Nearly all participants and comments agreed that it was important to maintain our street condition levels and understood that more funding would be needed based on when the streets in our community were originally built. The second goal of the open house was to inform and educate the public on what a franchisee fee is and how it would work if implemented. The information shared with the public revolved around the differences between the two most likely funding sources, which would be a property tax and a franchise fee. The majority of the input and comments were very positive of a franchise fee as compared to a property tax. While some of the comments were in favor of a property tax, after the explanation of how a franchise fee would work if implemented to achieve a 50/50 split of all street costs between commercial/other and residential property owners, the vast majority of those that attended and commented were more in favor of a franchise fee over an increased property tax levy. Lastly, the goal of the meeting was for staff to take public input on the possibility of implementing a franchise fee and eliminating the assessment practice. It was also staff's goal to answer any additional questions about the need for funding of our local street pavement management program and what and how a franchisee fee works. Listed below are a summary of all the comments staff received either electronically, over the phone or at the open house meetings over the past several months: 1. I was recently assessed and don’t feel it is fair that I would now have to pay a franchise fee and I expect I will receive some type of rebate of my assessment or future franchise fees paid. This was by far the most mentioned comment/concern. Staff indicated to those that attended that no CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, May 14, 2018SubjectFranchise Fee UpdateSection5:30 P.M. WORK SESSION TO BEHELD IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS Item No: A.2.Prepared By Greg Sticha, Finance Director File No: PW415(?)BACKGROUNDAt the end of 2017, city council directed staff to gather feedback from the community on the possibility ofimplementing a franchise fee and eliminating special assessments for the funding of our local street pavementmanagement program. Staff did this by taking public input via email, from the city’s website/request tracker, socialmedia and by holding two open houses over the past couple of months. This evening staff would like to share the inputwe received from the public. Staff will also be looking for direction from the city council on the next steps in order toachieve the funding needed for our local street pavement management program.Open houses held February 8, 2018 & April 10, 2018The first goal of the open houses was to inform the public on the need for additional funding for our local streetpavement management program in order to maintain our streets at or near the current pavement condition levels.Nearly all participants and comments agreed that it was important to maintain our street condition levels andunderstood that more funding would be needed based on when the streets in our community were originally built.The second goal of the open house was to inform and educate the public on what a franchisee fee is and how it wouldwork if implemented. The information shared with the public revolved around the differences between the two mostlikely funding sources, which would be a property tax and a franchise fee. The majority of the input and commentswere very positive of a franchise fee as compared to a property tax. While some of the comments were in favor of aproperty tax, after the explanation of how a franchise fee would work if implemented to achieve a 50/50 split of allstreet costs between commercial/other and residential property owners, the vast majority of those that attended andcommented were more in favor of a franchise fee over an increased property tax levy.Lastly, the goal of the meeting was for staff to take public input on the possibility of implementing a franchise fee andeliminating the assessment practice. It was also staff's goal to answer any additional questions about the need forfunding of our local street pavement management program and what and how a franchisee fee works. Listed beloware a summary of all the comments staff received either electronically, over the phone or at the open house meetingsover the past several months:1. I was recently assessed and don’t feel it is fair that I would now have to pay a franchise fee and Iexpect I will receive some type of rebate of my assessment or future franchise fees paid. This was by far the most mentioned comment/concern. Staff indicated to those that attended that no decision has been made to this point on this matter. Staff also noted that there will be future meetings with the city council to discuss this concern and how or if a rebate program of some sort would be established. 2. How do we make sure that the funding (either a property tax levy or franchise fee) stays in place for the street pavement management program only? Staff indicated that while it is this city council's intention to use the funding for our street pavement management program only, future city councils could decide to use either funding source for an alternative purpose. 3. How do we know that the utility companies won’t take more from me than what is authorized or that they will forward all funds over to the city? Staff indicated that within the franchise agreement there will be language included that will allow the city to conduct independent audits of all franchise fee records at all of the utility companies to assure the correct fee is being charged and that all funds are forwarded to the city. 4. Continue the assessment practice and use a property tax levy or franchise fee to fund the additional city portion of the costs. Staff indicated any combination of property tax levy, franchise fee and special assessments could be used to fund the need for our local street pavement management program and at this point in time the city council has not decided on the combination that will be used. 5. A franchise fee that is paid by the school districts will just be passed on to us via a property tax increase. The school districts receive their funding from a few different sources including property taxes (mostly from referendums) as well as state aid dollars (collected from a portion of commercial/industrial property taxes). In theory, this fee could be paid for by any number of the revenue sources they have. 6. I live on a private street. Why should I have to pay a franchise fee? If a franchise fee is implemented all gas and utility customers would need to pay the franchise fee. The franchise fee would be used to pay for some portion of collector roads and other local roads that all residents access at some point. 7. A franchise fee is the same thing as a tax and should not be misrepresented as anything other than a tax. Staff was very clear that the impact of a franchise fee is identical to that of a tax. The statutes require the language used on a utility bill for implementation of franchise fee be called a “franchise fee” on that utility bill. 8. Is there any way to charge garbage haulers for the constant use and damages to our local roads to help pay for this? State law does not allow for the city to charge an “Impact fee/tax” for use of the local roads by garbage haulers or other large commercial vehicles. Neighborhood agreements for organized collection of garbage is one option available to our property owners to minimize the impact that garbage haulers have on our local roads. DISCUSSION CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, May 14, 2018SubjectFranchise Fee UpdateSection5:30 P.M. WORK SESSION TO BEHELD IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS Item No: A.2.Prepared By Greg Sticha, Finance Director File No: PW415(?)BACKGROUNDAt the end of 2017, city council directed staff to gather feedback from the community on the possibility ofimplementing a franchise fee and eliminating special assessments for the funding of our local street pavementmanagement program. Staff did this by taking public input via email, from the city’s website/request tracker, socialmedia and by holding two open houses over the past couple of months. This evening staff would like to share the inputwe received from the public. Staff will also be looking for direction from the city council on the next steps in order toachieve the funding needed for our local street pavement management program.Open houses held February 8, 2018 & April 10, 2018The first goal of the open houses was to inform the public on the need for additional funding for our local streetpavement management program in order to maintain our streets at or near the current pavement condition levels.Nearly all participants and comments agreed that it was important to maintain our street condition levels andunderstood that more funding would be needed based on when the streets in our community were originally built.The second goal of the open house was to inform and educate the public on what a franchisee fee is and how it wouldwork if implemented. The information shared with the public revolved around the differences between the two mostlikely funding sources, which would be a property tax and a franchise fee. The majority of the input and commentswere very positive of a franchise fee as compared to a property tax. While some of the comments were in favor of aproperty tax, after the explanation of how a franchise fee would work if implemented to achieve a 50/50 split of allstreet costs between commercial/other and residential property owners, the vast majority of those that attended andcommented were more in favor of a franchise fee over an increased property tax levy.Lastly, the goal of the meeting was for staff to take public input on the possibility of implementing a franchise fee andeliminating the assessment practice. It was also staff's goal to answer any additional questions about the need forfunding of our local street pavement management program and what and how a franchisee fee works. Listed beloware a summary of all the comments staff received either electronically, over the phone or at the open house meetingsover the past several months:1. I was recently assessed and don’t feel it is fair that I would now have to pay a franchise fee and Iexpect I will receive some type of rebate of my assessment or future franchise fees paid.This was by far the most mentioned comment/concern. Staff indicated to those that attended that nodecision has been made to this point on this matter. Staff also noted that there will be future meetingswith the city council to discuss this concern and how or if a rebate program of some sort would beestablished.2. How do we make sure that the funding (either a property tax levy or franchise fee) stays in place forthe street pavement management program only?Staff indicated that while it is this city council's intention to use the funding for our street pavementmanagement program only, future city councils could decide to use either funding source for analternative purpose.3. How do we know that the utility companies won’t take more from me than what is authorized or thatthey will forward all funds over to the city?Staff indicated that within the franchise agreement there will be language included that will allow the cityto conduct independent audits of all franchise fee records at all of the utility companies to assure thecorrect fee is being charged and that all funds are forwarded to the city.4. Continue the assessment practice and use a property tax levy or franchise fee to fund the additionalcity portion of the costs.Staff indicated any combination of property tax levy, franchise fee and special assessments could beused to fund the need for our local street pavement management program and at this point in time thecity council has not decided on the combination that will be used.5. A franchise fee that is paid by the school districts will just be passed on to us via a property taxincrease.The school districts receive their funding from a few different sources including property taxes (mostlyfrom referendums) as well as state aid dollars (collected from a portion of commercial/industrialproperty taxes). In theory, this fee could be paid for by any number of the revenue sources they have.6. I live on a private street. Why should I have to pay a franchise fee?If a franchise fee is implemented all gas and utility customers would need to pay the franchise fee. Thefranchise fee would be used to pay for some portion of collector roads and other local roads that allresidents access at some point.7. A franchise fee is the same thing as a tax and should not be misrepresented as anything other than atax.Staff was very clear that the impact of a franchise fee is identical to that of a tax. The statutes requirethe language used on a utility bill for implementation of franchise fee be called a “franchise fee” on thatutility bill.8. Is there any way to charge garbage haulers for the constant use and damages to our local roads tohelp pay for this?State law does not allow for the city to charge an “Impact fee/tax” for use of the local roads by garbagehaulers or other large commercial vehicles. Neighborhood agreements for organized collection ofgarbage is one option available to our property owners to minimize the impact that garbage haulershave on our local roads. DISCUSSION Staff is looking for direction on the next steps in proceeding with finding a funding option for our local street pavement management program. Those options could include: 1. Hold additional public meetings to give those who were unable to attend the first two meetings the ability to make comments. 2. Begin discussing how a potential rebate of either special assessments paid or franchise fee rebate for those recently assessed could be accomplished. 3. Establish the exact breakdown of how the additional funding needed for roads is funded by either a franchise fee or property tax collection. This would include establishing some range of Franchise Fees for each type of Utility Meter if a franchise fee is used for any portion of the cost. ATTACHMENTS: Open House PowerPoint Presentation Revolving Assessment Construction Fund 1 2 Agenda •Explain the Purpose and the Need for Additional Funding for Pavement Management •Discuss what a Franchise Fees is •Input from Audience on Franchise Fee Proposed Franchise Fee Pavement Management Program (PMP) “Our Goal is to implement changes in the funding of the Pavement Management Program (PMP) by maintaining a sustainable and consistent funding source for PMP Street and Trail projects.” 3 City Streets •112 Miles of Streets to Maintain •Total Estimated Replacement Value ➢Largest Capital Asset $183,000,000 4 Pedestrian Trail Miles •60 Miles of Asphalt Trails −37 miles within Street Right-of-way −23 miles in Parks and open spaces −$9,100,000 Replacement Value 5 The Right Action at the Right Time…… ✓Prolongs pavement life ✓Keeps City’s infrastructure in good condition ✓Maintain or increases property values ✓Have a cost effective program 6 Pavement Management Program •PMP Started in 1991 •Every Street and Trail is surveyed once every 3 years o Document distresses –Potholes, Cracks, rutting etc. •Data is entered into program to generate a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) o Rating 100= new street, 0=gravel street •For Past 10 Years City’s average PCI has been around 70 o Generally considered in overall good condition 7 Street Maintenance Needs •Most streets where constructed in the 1980’s and 1990’s (≈60%) •These streets are now coming due for maintenance •PMP estimates PCI will be 44 in 20 years with current funding levels 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Pre 1970's 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010s Percent of Streets Constructed in Decade 8 27 miles 38 miles 9 Maintenance Strategies For Life Cycle Extension 10 Seal Coating≈$1.40/sy Mill & Overlay≈$13/sy Reconstruct≈$108/sy Reclamation≈$21/sy Pavement Condition Index (PCI)Pavement Condition Index (PCI)Pavement Age (Years) •Estimated Cost of Street Maintenance with Routine Maintenance over 60 Years $42.40/sy •Estimated Cost of Street Costs with no Routine Maintenance over 60 years $108/sy •About 2.5 times more expensive to not do Routine Maintenance Funding Need •The City has been spending about $2.0M annually on road projects ▪Average 2.6 miles of streets improved annually •To maintain a PCI of 70, funding will need to be increased •PMP estimates funding levels should increase to $3.3M to maintain the current pavement condition ▪Average yearly street project length would increase to 4.1 miles 11 How have we paid for improvements to date? A: Revolving Assessment Construction Fund •Started in 2006 with $6.7M in transfers from funds with surpluses (mostly from decertified TIF districts) •Has been used to pay for all local street improvements that are assessed to benefiting property owners (40%) •Total expenses per year on average have been about $2.0M 12 How have we paid for the $2.0M per year in assessed construction projects? 13 •The city assessment practice is to assess 40% to benefitting property owners, which would account for roughly $800,000 of the $2.0M per year, leaving $1.2M in city costs to all property owners per year 14 •Interest earned on repaid assessment •Occasional surplus transfers from the city’s general fund and other surpluses from other funds have been used •Interest earned on the fund balance reserves maintained in the fund since inception •In 2015 an opportunity was available to use a decreased debt levy to help fund PMP. That reduced levy was about $400,000 and has been in place since (currently $384,000) How has the city paid for the remaining $1.2M of its share of the costs? The Real Need…… $3.3M not $2.0M 15 •The amount of streets needing significant improvements that were built in the 80’s & 90’s (see slide 7) is and will continue to increase •If the city goal is to maintain the current PCI at or near 70, $3.3M per year needs to be spent on annual improvements not the current amount of $2.0M, based on our PCI system projections •Increasing the spending to $3.3 without increasing the funding will cause the revolving assessment construction fund to be in a deficit by 2020 Discussions to this Point (How to achieve funding for the $3.3M) •City Council discussed extensively options for funding PMP in 2017 ─Council Work sessions 1.June 12, 2017 2.August 28, 2017 3.September 11, 2017 4.September 25, 2017 5.October 9, 2017 6.November 27, 2017 7.December 11, 2017 •Discussion Options have included: −Increase the percentage of assessments −Raising the Levy −Establishing a Franchise Fee ▪Many Communities use Franchise Fees to Fund PMP •Based on these initial discussions, City Council asked staff to seek public comment on the possibility of implementing a Franchise Fee and elimination of special assessments 16 What is a Franchise Fee? •Cities have statutory authority to have franchise agreements with each utility company (gas and electric) for maintaining city-owned right-of-way •Within those agreements cities may charge the utility companies a fee for use of city right-of-way •Currently the City of Chanhassen does not impose a franchise fee associated with those agreements 17 Who has a Franchise Fee in Minnesota and 7 County Metro Area? 18 Location Franchise Fee Use Brooklyn Center Capital Projects Fund-Street reconstruction fund Champlin Capital Projects Fund-Infrastructure Replacement Bloomington Capital Projects Fund -Pavement Management& Bike Trails Eden Prairie Capital Projects Fund -Pavement Management Elk River Capital Projects Fund -Pavement Management Edina Capital Projects Fund-Sidewalks and Bike Trails Golden Valley Capital Projects Fund -street reconstruction fund for street Minneapolis General Fund -G,E,& C for general use except PEG fees Minnetonka Capital Projects Fund -Burial of electric lines and street lighting New Hope General Fund-Has had for 15 years Plymouth Capital Projects Fund -Street reconstruction fund Richfield Capital Projects Fund -Overlay, sealcoating and removal of diseased trees. Rogers Capital Projects Fund -City’s Pavement Management Program St. Louis Park Capital Projects Fund -City’s Pavement Management Program Victoria Capital Projects Fund –Undergrounding Power Lines Why a Franchise Fee vs a Property Tax Levy? 19 Property Tax Levy Residential Commericial/Others Franchise Fee Residential Commericial/Others •A Franchise Fee offers more flexibility than a property tax which charges 83 cents of every dollar to residential properties. A franchise fee could be set to meet a funding goal •The city is exploring the idea of funding all costs on a 50/50 basis between residential and commercial/other property owners, rather than 83/17 which is what a property tax levy would achieve Why a Franchise Fee? •Collects from all users of streets; Tax-exempt properties who currently do not pay for PMP would now be contributing to PMP •If city levied for all of PMP, the average home ($350,000) would see an increase in their city portion of their property tax bill of between $200-$220 ( whereas a franchise fee based on a 50/50 split would amount to around $120/year on a residential property) 20 0 50 100 150 200 250 Levy Only Franchise Fee Only What would a residential property pay? Levy Only Franchise Fee Only 21 •All remaining assessments and interest would be used •All remaining reserves in the revolving assessment construction fund would be used •The property tax levy that was added to the fund in 2015, which is currently at $384,000, would continue to be levied and used •That leaves about a $2.3M per year funding shortfall in order to achieve the goal of $3.3M per year in projects for the next 10-15 years How could the $3.3M be funded if the city implemented a Franchise Fee and eliminated special assessments? What would the franchise fee need to be in order to generate the $2.3M mentioned on the previous slide? •To achieve the total funding split of 50/50 between residential and commercial/other property owners, the residential franchise fee would need to be $4-$6 per month per utility (about $120 per year) 22 Schedule •Neighborhood Meetings: ✓February 8, 2018, 6-7:30pm Chanhassen Library ▪April 10, 2018, 6-7:30pm Chanhassen Library •City Council May Consider approval of Franchise Fee sometime in the summer of 2018 23 Frequently Asked Questions Is a Franchise Fee a Tax? A franchise fee has the same attributes and impact as a tax. The state statutes surrounding the collection of a franchise fee set the language for what the collection of the funds are called on the utility bills. 24 Frequently Asked Questions Why should a resident pay the same per month as a commercial business more frontage to streets and heavier more damaging vehicles? If a funding goal of 50/50 between residential property owners and commercial/other property owners is used, the result would be a franchise fee of $4-$6 per month for each utility for residential and a $10-$280 per month for each utility for commercial accounts. 25 Frequently Asked Questions What if the street in front of my house is in more than fair condition, does the city still need to increase funding for those streets? While some streets are still in good/fair condition, if the city continues funding streets with its current funding levels and practices, the result will be a pavement condition index that the city council has chosen to avoid. 26 Frequently Asked Questions Will the Franchise Fee Increase over time? We have projected the current pavement conditions along with the projected funding from this franchise fee and confident that there will be no increase in the franchise fee for the next 12-15 years. 27 Frequently Asked Questions I was assessed last year, why do I have to pay a Franchise Fee? Staff and city council are understandably aware of this concern. We are reviewing a number of possible options to see if there is a way to assist those property owners who have been recently assessed. 28 Frequently Asked Questions Can the franchise fee be used for other purposes? While the statutes allow for the use of franchise fee revenues for other funding purposes, city council’s intention is to use it solely for the Pavement Management Program. 29 Frequently Asked Questions When I begin paying the franchise fee will my street be redone within a couple of years? The basis for improvements will be based on the PCI of the road and the overall need. The annual contribution amount per residence could be approximately $120. The current average mill and overlay assessment at 40% is $2,500 per residence. It would take nearly 20-25 years for your contributions to equal the amount you would pay if assessed. 30 31 Location Franchise Fee Use Brooklyn Center Capital Projects Fund-Street reconstruction fund for street projects Champlin Capital Projects Fund-Infrastructure Replacement Bloomington Capital Projects Fund -Pavement Management& Bike Trails Eden Prairie Capital Projects Fund -Pavement Management Elk River Capital Projects Fund -Pavement Management Edina Capital Projects Fund-Sidewalks and Bike Trails Golden Valley Capital Projects Fund -street reconstruction fund for street projects (Douglas Drive) Minneapolis General Fund -G,E,& C for general use except PEG fees Minnetonka Capital Projects Fund -Burial of electric lines and street lighting New Hope General Fund-Has had for 15 years, was going to EDA until LGA cuts Plymouth Capital Projects Fund -Street reconstruction fund for street projects Richfield Capital Projects Fund -Overlay, sealcoating and removal of diseased trees. Rogers Capital Projects Fund -City’s Pavement Management Program St. Louis Park Capital Projects Fund -City’s Pavement Management Program Victoria Capital Projects Fund –Undergrounding Power Lines 32 Small Commercial -$8-12/month Medium Commercial -$28-34/month Large Commercial -$270-290/month Small Duel Fuel -$140-160/month Potential Franchise Fee For Commercial Properties 33 Total Levy vs. New Growth 34 Actual Property Tax Statement For Proposed 2018 Taxes (School District #112) 35 KFS General Fund Per Capita Spending Comparison 36 Hennepin County Tax Rates 2017 **Based on Urban Tax Rates 37 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017Project Cost2,752,000 1,600,000 1,000,000 1,900,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Assessments 40%(1,300,000) (640,000) (400,000) (760,000) (480,000) (400,000) (400,000) (400,000) (400,000) (400,000) (400,000) City Share1,452,000 960,000 600,000 1,140,000 720,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 Fund Bal - BOY5,366,920 2,969,119 1,406,444 530,959 (852,499) (1,430,633) (1,742,535) (1,996,830) (1,980,433) (1,932,321) (2,030,453) Levy210,720 (269,986) (260,313) 107,595 107,370 105,390 105,990 334,790 334,690 336,190 610,090 Repayment57,000 266,347 369,363 433,777 556,164 633,461 697,875 739,289 769,703 624,817 586,168 Less Prepaid SpecialsProject Costs(2,752,000) (1,600,000) (1,000,000) (1,900,000) (1,200,000) (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (1,000,000) Investable Balance2,882,640 1,365,480 515,494 (827,668) (1,388,964) (1,691,782) (1,938,670) (1,922,751) (1,876,040) (1,971,314) (1,834,195) Interest86,479 40,964 15,465 (24,830) (41,669) (50,753) (58,160) (57,683) (56,281) (59,139) (55,026) Fund Bal - EOY 5,366,920 2,969,119 1,406,444 530,959 (852,499) (1,430,633) (1,742,535) (1,996,830) (1,980,433) (1,932,321) (2,030,453) (1,889,221) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 6%Project Year 2005 $142,000.00 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 2006 $34,000.00 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 2007$209,346.73 209,300 209,300 209,300 209,300 209,300 209,300 209,300 2008$103,063.00 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 2009$64,414.38 64,414 64,414 64,414 64,414 64,414 64,414 64,414 2010$122,387.32 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 2011$77,297.25 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012$64,414.38 64,414 64,414 64,414 64,414 $64,414.38 64,414 64,414 64,414 $64,414.38 64,414 64,414 $64,414.38 64,414 $64,414.38Revolving Assessment FundAssessed Share Financed Thru City 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017Project Cost2,752,000 1,600,000 1,000,000 1,900,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Assessments 40%(1,300,000) (640,000) (400,000) (760,000) (480,000) (400,000) (400,000) (400,000) (400,000) (400,000) (400,000) City Share1,452,000 960,000 600,000 1,140,000 720,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 Fund Bal - BOY5,366,920 2,969,119 2,065,644 1,515,780 772,166 438,611 216,610 (11,433) (34,344) (93,064) (367,581) Levy210,720 (269,986) (260,313) 107,595 107,370 105,390 105,990 334,790 334,690 336,190 610,090 Repayment57,000 266,347 266,300 266,300 266,300 266,300 266,300 243,300 209,300 - - Less Prepaid SpecialsProject Costs(2,752,000) (960,000) (600,000) (1,140,000) (720,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) Investable Balance2,882,640 2,005,480 1,471,631 749,675 425,836 210,301 (11,100) (33,343) (90,354) (356,874) (357,491) Interest86,479 60,164 44,149 22,490 12,775 6,309 (333) (1,000) (2,711) (10,706) (10,725) Fund Bal - EOY 5,366,920 2,969,119 2,065,644 1,515,780 772,166 438,611 216,610 (11,433) (34,344) (93,064) (367,581) (368,215) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 6%Project Year 2005 $142,000.00 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 2006 $34,000.00 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 2007$209,346.73 209,300 209,300 209,300 209,300 209,300 209,300 209,300 20082009201020112012Revolving Assessment FundAssessed Share Financed Thru Bond Sale & New Facilities 2005 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023Project Cost1,700,000 950,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,400,000 1,400,000 1,400,000 1,500,000 Assessments 40% (680,000) (380,000) (560,000) (480,000) (480,000) (520,000) (520,000) (520,000) (560,000) (560,000) (560,000) (600,000) City Share1,020,000 570,000 840,000 720,000 720,000 780,000 780,000 780,000 840,000 840,000 840,000 900,000 Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2012**** 1,133,539 385,450 312,580 59,256 145,403 79,123 127,321 202,858 235,790 174,993 84,551 496,492 Levy437,842 130,680 444,410 450,192 431,698 670,538 664,293 659,378 660,978 653,293 1,114,690 1,111,790 Repayment627,842 737,346 775,540 831,720 699,717 673,951 705,336 666,687 673,128 653,803 682,789 682,789 Project Costs(1,825,000) (950,000) (1,475,000) (1,200,000) (1,200,000) (1,300,000) (1,300,000) (1,300,000) (1,400,000) (1,400,000) (1,400,000) (1,500,000) Investable Balance 374,223 303,476 57,530 141,168 76,818 123,612 196,949 228,922 169,896 82,089 482,031 791,071 MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest11,227 9,104 1,726 4,235 2,305 3,708 5,908 6,868 5,097 2,463 14,461 23,732 Fund Bal - EOY385,450 312,580 59,256 145,403 79,123 127,321 202,858 235,790 174,993 84,551 496,492 814,803 Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 6%Project Year 2005 23,000 23,000 23,000 2006 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 2007 209,300 209,300 209,300 209,300 209,300 2008 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 2009 58,795 58,795 58,795 58,795 58,795 58,795 58,795 2010 $122,387.00 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 2011 $77,297.00 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012$109,504.44 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013$61,193.66 61,194 61,194 61,194 61,194 61,194 61,194 61,194 2014$90,180.13 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 2015$77,297.25 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2016$77,297.25 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 2017$83,738.69 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 2018$83,738.69 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 2019$83,738.69 83,738 83,738 83,738 2020$90,180.13 90,180 90,180 2021$90,180.13 90,180 2022$90,180.1320232024202520262027202820292030Revolving Assessment Fund 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 20301,500,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,700,000 1,700,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 (600,000) (640,000) (640,000) (680,000) (680,000) (720,000) (720,000) 900,000 960,000 960,000 1,020,000 1,020,000 1,080,000 1,080,000 814,803 1,160,714 1,426,550 1,715,425 1,931,828 2,173,640 2,339,096 1,109,990 1,109,290 1,104,590 1,106,490 1,099,090 1,098,590 1,098,590 702,114 714,997 734,321 753,646 779,412 798,736 824,502 (1,500,000) (1,600,000) (1,600,000) (1,700,000) (1,700,000) (1,800,000) (1,800,000) 1,126,906 1,385,000 1,665,461 1,875,561 2,110,330 2,270,967 2,462,187 33,807 41,550 49,964 56,267 63,310 68,129 73,866 1,160,714 1,426,550 1,715,425 1,931,828 2,173,640 2,339,096 2,536,053 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 $96,621.57 96,621 96,621 96,621 96,621 96,621 96,621 $96,621.57 96,621 96,621 96,621 96,621 96,621 $103,063.00 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 $103,063.00 103,063 103,063 103,063 $109,504.44 109,504 109,504 $109,504.44 109,504 $115,945.88 2005 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023Project Cost (Street Only) 1,700,000 1,695,000 1,400,000 2,255,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 Assessments 40%(680,000) (678,000) (560,000) (902,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) City Share1,020,000 1,017,000 840,000 1,353,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 Other project Costs(200,000) (75,000) Tsfs in2,000,000 - Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2012**** 1,133,539 385,450 1,399,230 1,150,684 232,370 (20,859) (42,319) (31,916) (52,824) (52,829) (74,041) 366,371 Levy437,842 130,680 444,410 450,192 431,698 670,538 664,293 659,378 660,978 653,293 1,114,690 1,111,790 Repayment627,842 737,346 823,528 879,726 815,680 809,235 847,040 821,253 840,556 827,652 815,052 821,472 Project Costs(1,825,000) (1,695,000) (1,475,000) (2,255,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) Investable Balance374,223 1,358,476 1,117,169 225,602 (20,252) (41,087) (30,987) (51,286) (51,291) (71,885) 355,700 799,633 MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest11,227 40,754 33,515 6,768 (608) (1,233) (930) (1,539) (1,539) (2,157) 10,671 23,989 Fund Bal - EOY385,450 1,399,230 1,150,684 232,370 (20,859) (42,319) (31,916) (52,824) (52,829) (74,041) 366,371 823,622 Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 6%Project Year 2005 23,000 23,000 2006 34,000 34,000 34,000 2007 209,300 209,300 209,300 209,300 2008 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 2009 58,795 58,795 58,795 58,795 58,795 58,795 2010 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 2011 $77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012$109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013$109,182 109,200 109,200 109,200 109,200 109,200 109,200 109,200 2014$90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 2015$145,254 145,250 145,250 145,250 145,250 145,250 145,250 145,250 2016$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2017$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2018$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2019$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 2020$96,622 96,600 96,600 2021$96,622 96,600 2022$96,62220232024202520262027202820292030Revolving Assessment Fund 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 20301,500,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,700,000 1,700,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 (600,000) (640,000) (640,000) (680,000) (680,000) (720,000) (720,000) 900,000 960,000 960,000 1,020,000 1,020,000 1,080,000 1,080,000 823,622 1,242,626 1,570,480 1,909,963 2,165,244 2,433,854 2,620,298 1,109,990 1,109,290 1,104,590 1,106,490 1,099,090 1,098,590 1,098,590 772,822 772,822 779,263 785,726 798,630 811,534 830,880 (1,500,000) (1,600,000) (1,600,000) (1,700,000) (1,700,000) (1,800,000) (1,800,000) 1,206,433 1,524,738 1,854,333 2,102,179 2,362,965 2,543,978 2,749,768 36,193 45,742 55,630 63,065 70,889 76,319 82,493 1,242,626 1,570,480 1,909,963 2,165,244 2,433,854 2,620,298 2,832,261 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 $96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 $96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 $103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 $103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 $109,504 109,504 109,504 $109,504 109,504 $115,946 2005 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Project Cost (Street Only) 1,410,000 1,400,000 2,255,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,600,000 Assessments 40% (564,000) (560,000) (902,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (640,000) City Share 846,000 840,000 1,353,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 960,000 Other project Costs (200,000) (75,000) Tsfs in- Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2013**** 2,600,000 1,913,767 1,507,247 445,131 43,784 (130,236) (276,971) (459,731) (626,443) (819,363) (555,811) (280,725) (49,351) Levy130,680 294,410 300,192 281,698 520,538 514,293 509,378 510,978 503,293 964,690 961,790 959,990 959,290 Repayment 737,346 805,170 879,726 815,680 809,235 847,040 821,253 840,556 827,652 815,052 821,472 772,822 772,822 Project Costs (1,410,000) (1,475,000) (2,255,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,600,000) Investable Balance 1,858,026 1,463,347 432,166 42,509 (126,443) (268,904) (446,340) (608,197) (795,498) (539,622) (272,549) (47,914) 82,760 MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest55,741 43,900 12,965 1,275 (3,793) (8,067) (13,390) (18,246) (23,865) (16,189) (8,176) (1,437) 2,483 Fund Bal - EOY 1,913,767 1,507,247 445,131 43,784 (130,236) (276,971) (459,731) (626,443) (819,363) (555,811) (280,725) (49,351) 85,243 Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 6%Project Year 2005 23,000 2006 34,000 34,000 2007 209,300 209,300 209,300 2008 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 2009 58,795 58,795 58,795 58,795 58,795 2010 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012 $109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $90,824 109,200 109,200 109,200 109,200 109,200 109,200 109,200 2014$90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 2015$145,254 145,250 145,250 145,250 145,250 145,250 145,250 145,250 2016$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2017$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2018$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2019$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2020$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2021$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 2022$96,622 96,600 96,600 2023$96,622 96,600 2024$96,622202520262027202820292030Revolving Assessment Fund 2026 2027 2028 2029 20301,600,000 1,700,000 1,700,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 (640,000) (680,000) (680,000) (720,000) (720,000) 960,000 1,020,000 1,020,000 1,080,000 1,080,000 85,243 225,669 275,922 333,351 302,280 954,590 956,490 949,090 948,590 948,590 779,263 785,726 798,630 811,534 830,880 (1,600,000) (1,700,000) (1,700,000) (1,800,000) (1,800,000) 219,096 267,885 323,642 293,476 281,750 6,573 8,037 9,709 8,804 8,452 225,669 275,922 333,351 302,280 290,202 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 $103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 $103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 $109,504 109,504 109,504 $109,504 109,504 $115,946 2005 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Project Cost (Street Only) 1,410,000 1,400,000 1,850,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,600,000 Assessments 40% (564,000) (560,000) (740,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (640,000) City Share 846,000 840,000 1,110,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 960,000 Other project Costs (200,000) (175,000) Tsfs in467,919 Tenn Courts &61 studyFund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2013**** 2,600,000 2,395,723 2,055,163 1,581,133 1,341,497 1,334,042 1,358,870 1,352,820 1,368,119 1,362,670 1,339,856 1,319,984 1,274,418 Levy130,680 444,410 450,192 431,698 670,538 664,293 659,378 660,978 653,293 649,193 646,293 644,493 643,793 Repayment 737,346 805,170 879,726 789,593 783,152 820,957 795,170 814,473 801,569 788,969 795,389 772,822 772,822 Project Costs (1,410,000) (1,475,000) (1,850,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,600,000) Investable Balance 2,325,945 1,995,304 1,535,081 1,302,424 1,295,186 1,319,291 1,313,418 1,328,271 1,322,980 1,300,831 1,281,538 1,237,299 1,091,032 MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest69,778 59,859 46,052 39,073 38,856 39,579 39,403 39,848 39,689 39,025 38,446 37,119 32,731 Fund Bal - EOY 2,395,723 2,055,163 1,581,133 1,341,497 1,334,042 1,358,870 1,352,820 1,368,119 1,362,670 1,339,856 1,319,984 1,274,418 1,123,763 Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 6%Project Year 2005 23,000 2006 34,000 34,000 2007 209,300 209,300 209,300 2008 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 2009 58,795 58,795 58,795 58,795 58,795 2010 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012 $109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $90,824 109,200 109,200 109,200 109,200 109,200 109,200 109,200 2014$90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 2015$119,167 119,167 119,167 119,167 119,167 119,167 119,167 119,167 2016$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2017$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2018$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2019$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2020$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2021$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 2022$96,622 96,600 96,600 2023$96,622 96,600 2024$96,622202520262027202820292030Revolving Assessment Fund 2026 2027 2028 2029 20301,600,000 1,700,000 1,700,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 (640,000) (680,000) (680,000) (720,000) (720,000) 960,000 1,020,000 1,020,000 1,080,000 1,080,000 1,123,763 970,383 718,015 463,745 111,624 639,093 640,993 633,593 633,093 633,093 779,263 785,726 798,630 811,534 830,880 (1,600,000) (1,700,000) (1,700,000) (1,800,000) (1,800,000) 942,119 697,102 450,238 108,373 (224,403) 28,264 20,913 13,507 3,251 (6,732) 970,383 718,015 463,745 111,624 (231,135) 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 $103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 $103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 $109,504 109,504 109,504 $109,504 109,504 $115,946 2005 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027Project Cost (Street Only) 1,850,000 1,560,000 1,622,400 1,687,296 1,754,788 1,824,979 1,897,979 1,973,898 2,052,854 2,134,968 2,220,366 2,309,181 2,401,548 Assessments 40% (740,000) (624,000) (648,960) (674,918) (701,915) (729,992) (759,191) (789,559) (821,141) (853,987) (888,147) (923,672) (960,619) City Share 1,110,000 936,000 973,440 1,012,378 1,052,873 1,094,988 1,138,787 1,184,339 1,231,712 1,280,981 1,332,220 1,385,509 1,440,929 Other project CostsTenn Courts &(150,000) Tsfs in194,751 194,751 194,751 194,751 Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2014**** 2,148,552 1,636,854 1,494,985 1,524,599 1,525,724 1,282,774 952,408 537,815 64,427 (465,327) (1,078,333) (1,754,757) (2,501,964) Levy - From Debt Levy Schedule 450,192 431,698 670,538 664,293 659,378 660,978 653,293 649,193 646,293 644,493 643,793 639,093 640,993 Reduction for Other purposesRepayment 856,015 762,369 756,830 799,461 782,556 814,961 819,547 850,053 885,931 898,612 934,557 971,939 1,010,817 Project Costs (1,850,000) (1,560,000) (1,622,400) (1,687,296) (1,754,788) (1,824,979) (1,897,979) (1,973,898) (2,052,854) (2,134,968) (2,220,366) (2,309,181) (2,401,548) Investable Balance 1,604,759 1,465,672 1,494,705 1,495,808 1,257,621 933,733 527,270 63,163 (456,203) (1,057,190) (1,720,350) (2,452,906) (3,251,703) MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest32,095 29,313 29,894 29,916 25,152 18,675 10,545 1,263 (9,124) (21,144) (34,407) (49,058) (65,034) Fund Bal - EOY 1,636,854 1,494,985 1,524,599 1,525,724 1,282,774 952,408 537,815 64,427 (465,327) (1,078,333) (1,754,757) (2,501,964) (3,316,737) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 5.25%Project Year 200520062007 209,300 2008 103,063 103,063 2009 58,795 58,795 58,795 2010 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,1472014 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,5222015 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,6542016$97,524 $97,524 $97,524 $97,524 $97,524 $97,524 $97,524 $97,5242017$101,425 $101,425 $101,425 $101,425 $101,425 $101,425 $101,425 $101,4252018$105,482 $105,482 $105,482 $105,482 $105,482 $105,482 $105,482 $105,4822019$109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,7022020$114,090 $114,090 $114,090 $114,090 $114,090 $114,090 $114,0902021$118,653 $118,653 $118,653 $118,653 $118,653 $118,6532022$123,400 $123,400 $123,400 $123,400 $123,4002023$128,336 $128,336 $128,336 $128,3362024$133,469 $133,469 $133,4692025$138,808 $138,8082026$144,3602027202820292030Revolving Assessment Fund 2028 2029 20302,497,610 2,597,515 2,701,415 (999,044) (1,039,006) (1,080,566) 1,498,566 1,558,509 1,620,849 (3,316,737) (4,212,095) (5,184,882) 633,593 633,093 633,093 1,051,249 1,093,299 1,137,031 (2,497,610) (2,597,515) (2,701,415) (4,129,505) (5,083,217) (6,116,173) (82,590) (101,664) (122,323) (4,212,095) (5,184,882) (6,238,496) $114,090$118,653 $118,653$123,400 $123,400 $123,400$128,336 $128,336 $128,336$133,469 $133,469 $133,469$138,808 $138,808 $138,808$144,360 $144,360 $144,360$150,134 $150,134 $150,134$156,140 $156,140$162,385 2005 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027Project Cost (Street Only) 1,850,000 2,260,000 922,400 1,687,300 1,754,792 2,500,000 1,900,000 1,976,000 2,055,040 2,137,242 2,222,731 2,311,641 2,404,106 Assessments 40% (740,000) (904,000) (368,960) (674,920) (701,917) (1,000,000) (760,000) (790,400) (822,016) (854,897) (889,093) (924,656) (961,642) City Share 1,110,000 1,356,000 553,440 1,012,380 1,052,875 1,500,000 1,140,000 1,185,600 1,233,024 1,282,345 1,333,639 1,386,984 1,442,464 Other project CostsTenn Courts & (340,000) (150,000) Tsfs in125,000 194,751 194,751 194,751 194,751 Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2015**** 1,825,583 1,088,126 221,282 984,058 974,368 720,387 (309,747) (708,601) (1,165,889) (1,679,173) (2,275,329) (2,979,150) (3,709,611) Levy - From Debt Levy Schedule 450,192 431,698 670,538 664,293 659,378 660,978 653,293 649,193 646,293 644,493 643,793 639,093 640,993 Reduction for Other purposesRepayment 856,015 762,369 800,591 799,461 782,557 814,962 861,747 892,379 928,388 941,207 933,532 1,014,823 1,053,855 Project Costs (1,850,000) (2,260,000) (922,400) (1,687,300) (1,754,792) (2,500,000) (1,900,000) (1,976,000) (2,055,040) (2,137,242) (2,222,731) (2,311,641) (2,404,106) Investable Balance 1,066,790 216,944 964,763 955,263 706,262 (303,673) (694,707) (1,143,029) (1,646,248) (2,230,715) (2,920,735) (3,636,874) (4,418,870) MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest21,336 4,339 19,295 19,105 14,125 (6,073) (13,894) (22,861) (32,925) (44,614) (58,415) (72,737) (88,377) Fund Bal - EOY 1,088,126 221,282 984,058 974,368 720,387 (309,747) (708,601) (1,165,889) (1,679,173) (2,275,329) (2,979,150) (3,709,611) (4,507,247) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 5.25%Project Year 200520062007 209,300 2008 103,063 103,063 2009 58,795 58,795 58,795 2010 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,1472014 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,5222015 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,6542016$141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,2852017$57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,6642018$105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,4832019$109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,7022020$156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,2892021$118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,7802022$123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,5312023$128,472 $128,472 $128,472 $128,4722024$133,611 $133,611 $133,6112025$138,956 $138,9562026$144,5142027202820292030Revolving Assessment Fund 2028 2029 20302,500,270 2,600,281 2,704,292 (1,000,108) (1,040,112) (1,081,717) 1,500,162 1,560,169 1,622,575 (4,507,247) (5,385,067) (6,382,948) 633,593 633,093 633,093 1,094,447 1,094,464 1,138,242 (2,500,270) (2,600,281) (2,704,292) (5,279,478) (6,257,792) (7,315,905) (105,590) (125,156) (146,318) (5,385,067) (6,382,948) (7,462,223) $156,289$118,780 $118,780$123,531 $123,531 $123,531$128,472 $128,472 $128,472$133,611 $133,611 $133,611$138,956 $138,956 $138,956$144,514 $144,514 $144,514$150,294 $150,294 $150,294$156,306 $156,306$162,558 2005 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028Project Cost (Street Only) 2,260,000 922,400 1,687,300 1,754,792 2,500,000 1,900,000 1,976,000 2,055,040 2,137,242 2,222,731 2,311,641 2,404,106 2,500,270 Assessments 40% (904,000) (368,960) (674,920) (701,917) (1,000,000) (760,000) (790,400) (822,016) (854,897) (889,093) (924,656) (961,642) (1,000,108) City Share 1,356,000 553,440 1,012,380 1,052,875 1,500,000 1,140,000 1,185,600 1,233,024 1,282,345 1,333,639 1,386,984 1,442,464 1,500,162 Other project CostsTenn Courts & 382,365 (150,000) Tsfs in194,751 194,751 194,751 194,751 Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2016**** 1,680,000 1,215,007 1,997,657 2,008,239 1,774,935 765,892 388,551 (46,794) (537,696) (1,111,023) (1,791,557) (2,498,267) (3,271,676) Levy - From Debt Levy Schedule 431,698 670,538 664,293 659,378 660,978 653,293 649,193 646,293 644,493 643,793 639,093 640,993 633,593 Reduction for Other purposesRepayment 762,369 800,591 799,461 782,557 814,962 861,747 892,379 928,388 941,207 933,532 1,014,823 1,053,855 1,094,447 Project Costs (2,260,000) (922,400) (1,687,300) (1,754,792) (2,500,000) (1,900,000) (1,976,000) (2,055,040) (2,137,242) (2,222,731) (2,311,641) (2,404,106) (2,500,270) Investable Balance 1,191,183 1,958,487 1,968,862 1,740,133 750,875 380,932 (45,877) (527,153) (1,089,238) (1,756,429) (2,449,281) (3,207,525) (4,043,907) MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest23,824 39,170 39,377 34,803 15,017 7,619 (918) (10,543) (21,785) (35,129) (48,986) (64,151) (80,878) Fund Bal - EOY 1,215,007 1,997,657 2,008,239 1,774,935 765,892 388,551 (46,794) (537,696) (1,111,023) (1,791,557) (2,498,267) (3,271,676) (4,124,785) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 5.25%Project Year 2005200620072008 103,063 2009 58,795 58,795 2010 122,387 122,387 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,1472014 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,5222015 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,6542016 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,2852017$57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,6642018$105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,4832019$109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,7022020$156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,2892021$118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,7802022$123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,5312023$128,472 $128,472 $128,472 $128,472 $128,4722024$133,611 $133,611 $133,611 $133,6112025$138,956 $138,956 $138,9562026$144,514 $144,5142027$150,294202820292030Revolving Assessment Fund 2029 20302,600,281 2,704,292 (1,040,112) (1,081,717) 1,560,169 1,622,575 (4,124,785) (5,097,459) 633,093 633,093 1,094,464 1,138,242 (2,600,281) (2,704,292) (4,997,509) (6,030,416) (99,950) (120,608) (5,097,459) (6,151,025) $118,780$123,531 $123,531$128,472 $128,472$133,611 $133,611$138,956 $138,956$144,514 $144,514$150,294 $150,294$156,306 $156,306$162,558 2005 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028Project Cost (Street Only) 2,260,000 922,400 1,687,300 1,754,792 2,500,000 1,900,000 1,976,000 2,055,040 2,137,242 2,222,731 2,311,641 2,404,106 2,500,270 Assessments 40% (904,000) (368,960) (674,920) (701,917) (1,000,000) (760,000) (790,400) (822,016) (854,897) (889,093) (924,656) (961,642) (1,000,108) City Share 1,356,000 553,440 1,012,380 1,052,875 1,500,000 1,140,000 1,185,600 1,233,024 1,282,345 1,333,639 1,386,984 1,442,464 1,500,162 Other project CostsTenn Courts & 382,365 (150,000) Tsfs in194,751 194,751 194,751 194,751 Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2016**** 1,680,000 1,215,007 1,752,143 1,512,301 1,023,564 (246,020) (889,114) (1,595,526) (2,362,917) (3,218,262) (4,186,455) (5,186,577) (6,259,266) Levy - From Debt Levy Schedule 431,698 429,838 423,593 418,678 420,278 412,593 408,493 405,593 403,793 403,093 398,393 400,293 392,893 Reduction for Other purposesRepayment 762,369 800,591 799,461 782,557 814,962 861,747 892,379 928,388 941,207 933,532 1,014,823 1,053,855 1,094,447 Project Costs (2,260,000) (922,400) (1,687,300) (1,754,792) (2,500,000) (1,900,000) (1,976,000) (2,055,040) (2,137,242) (2,222,731) (2,311,641) (2,404,106) (2,500,270) Investable Balance 1,191,183 1,717,787 1,482,648 1,003,494 (241,196) (871,680) (1,564,242) (2,316,585) (3,155,159) (4,104,368) (5,084,879) (6,136,535) (7,272,197) MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest23,824 34,356 29,653 20,070 (4,824) (17,434) (31,285) (46,332) (63,103) (82,087) (101,698) (122,731) (145,444) Fund Bal - EOY 1,215,007 1,752,143 1,512,301 1,023,564 (246,020) (889,114) (1,595,526) (2,362,917) (3,218,262) (4,186,455) (5,186,577) (6,259,266) (7,417,640) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 5.25%Project Year 2005200620072008 103,063 2009 58,795 58,795 2010 122,387 122,387 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,1472014 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,5222015 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,6542016 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,2852017$57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,6642018$105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,4832019$109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,7022020$156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,2892021$118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,7802022$123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,5312023$128,472 $128,472 $128,472 $128,472 $128,4722024$133,611 $133,611 $133,611 $133,6112025$138,956 $138,956 $138,9562026$144,514 $144,5142027$150,294202820292030Revolving Assessment Fund 2029 20302,600,281 2,704,292 (1,040,112) (1,081,717) 1,560,169 1,622,575 (7,417,640) (8,701,686) 392,393 392,393 1,094,464 1,138,242 (2,600,281) (2,704,292) (8,531,065) (9,875,343) (170,621) (197,507) (8,701,686) (10,072,850) $118,780$123,531 $123,531$128,472 $128,472$133,611 $133,611$138,956 $138,956$144,514 $144,514$150,294 $150,294$156,306 $156,306$162,558 2005 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028Project Cost (Street Only) 600,000 3,275,000 1,600,000 1,100,000 3,300,000 1,100,000 1,900,000 1,976,000 2,055,040 2,137,242 2,222,731 2,311,641 2,404,106 Assessments 40% (240,000) (1,310,000) (640,000) (440,000) (1,320,000) (440,000) (760,000) (790,400) (822,016) (854,897) (889,093) (924,656) (961,642) City Share 360,000 1,965,000 960,000 660,000 1,980,000 660,000 1,140,000 1,185,600 1,233,024 1,282,345 1,333,639 1,386,984 1,442,464 Other project CostsTenn Courts & 382,365 750,000 (150,000) Tsfs in194,751 194,751 194,751 194,751 Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2016**** 1,680,000 2,908,207 978,293 1,625,775 1,850,383 (217,231) 8,698 (125,994) (311,975) (576,098) (837,281) (1,268,231) (1,756,841) Levy - From Debt Levy Schedule 431,698 434,338 428,093 423,178 424,778 417,093 878,493 875,593 873,793 873,093 868,393 870,293 862,893 Reduction for Other purposesRepayment 762,369 696,815 842,759 820,397 811,868 908,665 889,285 920,543 928,420 1,019,383 948,255 987,186 1,062,932 Project Costs (600,000) (3,275,000) (1,600,000) (1,100,000) (3,300,000) (1,100,000) (1,900,000) (1,976,000) (2,055,040) (2,137,242) (2,222,731) (2,311,641) (2,404,106) Investable Balance 2,851,183 959,111 1,593,897 1,814,101 (212,972) 8,527 (123,524) (305,858) (564,802) (820,864) (1,243,364) (1,722,393) (2,235,122) MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest57,024 19,182 31,878 36,282 (4,259) 171 (2,470) (6,117) (11,296) (16,417) (24,867) (34,448) (44,702) Fund Bal - EOY 2,908,207 978,293 1,625,775 1,850,383 (217,231) 8,698 (125,994) (311,975) (576,098) (837,281) (1,268,231) (1,756,841) (2,279,824) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 5.25%Project Year 2005200620072008 103,063 2009 58,795 58,795 2010 122,387 122,387 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,1472014 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,5222015 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,6542016 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,5092017$204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,7392018$100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,0252019$68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,7672020$206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,3022021$68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,7672022$118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,7802023$123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,5312024$128,472 $128,472 $128,472 $128,4722025$133,611 $133,611 $133,6112026$138,956 $138,9562027$144,514202820292030Revolving Assessment Fund 2029 20302,500,270 2,600,281 (1,000,108) (1,040,112) 1,500,162 1,560,169 (2,279,824) (2,968,992) 862,393 862,393 1,006,925 1,094,464 (2,500,270) (2,600,281) (2,910,776) (3,612,416) (58,216) (72,248) (2,968,992) (3,684,665) $68,767$118,780 $118,780$123,531 $123,531$128,472 $128,472$133,611 $133,611$138,956 $138,956$144,514 $144,514$150,294 $150,294$156,306 2005 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028Project Cost (Street Only) 600,000 3,275,000 1,600,000 1,100,000 3,300,000 1,100,000 1,900,000 1,976,000 2,055,040 2,137,242 2,222,731 2,311,641 2,404,106 Assessments 40% (240,000) (1,310,000) (640,000) (440,000) (1,320,000) (440,000) (760,000) (790,400) (822,016) (854,897) (889,093) (924,656) (961,642) City Share 360,000 1,965,000 960,000 660,000 1,980,000 660,000 1,140,000 1,185,600 1,233,024 1,282,345 1,333,639 1,386,984 1,442,464 Other project CostsTenn Courts & 382,365 750,000 (150,000) Tsfs in194,751 194,751 194,751 194,751 Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2016**** 1,680,000 2,908,207 943,613 1,562,091 1,758,441 (342,381) (149,918) (318,747) (534,958) (831,446) (1,126,865) (1,589,574) (2,114,046) Levy - From Debt Levy Schedule 431,698 400,338 400,338 396,723 394,023 386,738 848,135 849,735 846,435 844,535 842,935 841,435 834,935 Reduction for Other purposesRepayment 762,369 696,815 842,759 820,397 811,868 908,665 889,285 920,543 928,420 1,019,383 948,255 987,186 1,062,932 Project Costs (600,000) (3,275,000) (1,600,000) (1,100,000) (3,300,000) (1,100,000) (1,900,000) (1,976,000) (2,055,040) (2,137,242) (2,222,731) (2,311,641) (2,404,106) Investable Balance 2,851,183 925,111 1,531,462 1,723,962 (335,668) (146,978) (312,497) (524,469) (815,143) (1,104,770) (1,558,406) (2,072,594) (2,620,285) MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest57,024 18,502 30,629 34,479 (6,713) (2,940) (6,250) (10,489) (16,303) (22,095) (31,168) (41,452) (52,406) Fund Bal - EOY 2,908,207 943,613 1,562,091 1,758,441 (342,381) (149,918) (318,747) (534,958) (831,446) (1,126,865) (1,589,574) (2,114,046) (2,672,690) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 5.25%Project Year 2005200620072008 103,063 2009 58,795 58,795 2010 122,387 122,387 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,1472014 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,5222015 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,6542016 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,5092017$204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,7392018$100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,0252019$68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,7672020$206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,3022021$68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,7672022$118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,7802023$123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,5312024$128,472 $128,472 $128,472 $128,4722025$133,611 $133,611 $133,6112026$138,956 $138,9562027$144,514202820292030Revolving Assessment Fund 2029 20302,500,270 2,600,281 (1,000,108) (1,040,112) 1,500,162 1,560,169 (2,672,690) (3,398,743) 833,935 833,935 1,006,925 1,094,464 (2,500,270) (2,600,281) (3,332,101) (4,070,625) (66,642) (81,413) (3,398,743) (4,152,038) $68,767$118,780 $118,780$123,531 $123,531$128,472 $128,472$133,611 $133,611$138,956 $138,956$144,514 $144,514$150,294 $150,294$156,306 2005 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028Project Cost (Street Only) 600,000 3,275,000 1,600,000 1,100,000 3,300,000 1,100,000 1,900,000 1,976,000 2,055,040 2,137,242 2,222,731 2,311,641 2,404,106 Assessments 40% (240,000) (1,310,000) (640,000) (440,000) (1,320,000) (440,000) (760,000) (790,400) (822,016) (854,897) (889,093) (924,656) (961,642) City Share 360,000 1,965,000 960,000 660,000 1,980,000 660,000 1,140,000 1,185,600 1,233,024 1,282,345 1,333,639 1,386,984 1,442,464 Other project CostsTenn Courts & 382,365 750,000 (150,000) Tsfs in194,751 194,751 194,751 194,751 Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2016**** 1,680,000 2,908,207 927,803 1,530,155 1,710,056 (407,544) (232,194) (418,479) (652,494) (967,143) (1,281,086) (1,762,689) (2,306,433) Levy - From Debt Levy Schedule 431,698 384,838 384,838 381,223 378,523 371,238 832,635 834,235 830,935 829,035 827,435 825,935 819,435 Reduction for Other purposesRepayment 762,369 696,815 842,759 820,397 811,868 908,665 889,285 920,543 928,420 1,019,383 948,255 987,186 1,062,932 Project Costs (600,000) (3,275,000) (1,600,000) (1,100,000) (3,300,000) (1,100,000) (1,900,000) (1,976,000) (2,055,040) (2,137,242) (2,222,731) (2,311,641) (2,404,106) Investable Balance 2,851,183 909,611 1,500,152 1,676,526 (399,553) (227,641) (410,273) (639,700) (948,179) (1,255,966) (1,728,127) (2,261,209) (2,828,172) MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest57,024 18,192 30,003 33,531 (7,991) (4,553) (8,205) (12,794) (18,964) (25,119) (34,563) (45,224) (56,563) Fund Bal - EOY 2,908,207 927,803 1,530,155 1,710,056 (407,544) (232,194) (418,479) (652,494) (967,143) (1,281,086) (1,762,689) (2,306,433) (2,884,735) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 5.25%Project Year 2005200620072008 103,063 2009 58,795 58,795 2010 122,387 122,387 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,1472014 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,5222015 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,6542016 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,5092017$204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,7392018$100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,0252019$68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,7672020$206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,3022021$68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,7672022$118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,7802023$123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,5312024$128,472 $128,472 $128,472 $128,4722025$133,611 $133,611 $133,6112026$138,956 $138,9562027$144,514202820292030Revolving Assessment Fund 2029 20302,500,270 2,600,281 (1,000,108) (1,040,112) 1,500,162 1,560,169 (2,884,735) (3,630,839) 818,435 818,435 1,006,925 1,094,464 (2,500,270) (2,600,281) (3,559,646) (4,318,221) (71,193) (86,364) (3,630,839) (4,404,586) $68,767$118,780 $118,780$123,531 $123,531$128,472 $128,472$133,611 $133,611$138,956 $138,956$144,514 $144,514$150,294 $150,294$156,306 2005 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030Project Cost (Street Only) 3,275,000 1,600,000 1,100,000 3,300,000 1,100,000 1,900,000 1,976,000 2,055,040 2,137,242 2,222,731 2,311,641 2,404,106 2,500,270 2,600,281 Assessments 40% (1,310,000) (640,000) (440,000) (1,320,000) (440,000) (760,000) (790,400) (822,016) (854,897) (889,093) (924,656) (961,642) (1,000,108) (1,040,112) City Share 1,965,000 960,000 660,000 1,980,000 660,000 1,140,000 1,185,600 1,233,024 1,282,345 1,333,639 1,386,984 1,442,464 1,500,162 1,560,169 Other project CostsTenn Courts & 750,000 (150,000) Tsfs in 474,751 194,751 194,751 Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2016**** 2,689,263 990,081 1,593,678 1,774,850 (341,455) (164,782) (349,719) (582,360) (895,606) (1,208,118) (1,688,262) (2,230,517) (2,807,301) (3,551,856) Levy - From Debt Levy Schedule 384,838 384,838 381,223 378,523 371,238 832,635 834,235 830,935 829,035 827,435 825,935 819,435 818,435 818,435 Reduction for Other purposesRepayment 696,815 842,759 820,397 811,868 908,665 889,285 920,543 928,420 1,019,383 948,255 987,186 1,062,932 1,006,925 1,094,464 Project Costs (3,275,000) (1,600,000) (1,100,000) (3,300,000) (1,100,000) (1,900,000) (1,976,000) (2,055,040) (2,137,242) (2,222,731) (2,311,641) (2,404,106) (2,500,270) (2,600,281) Investable Balance 970,667 1,562,429 1,740,049 (334,760) (161,551) (342,862) (570,941) (878,045) (1,184,429) (1,655,159) (2,186,782) (2,752,256) (3,482,212) (4,239,238) MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest19,413 31,249 34,801 (6,695) (3,231) (6,857) (11,419) (17,561) (23,689) (33,103) (43,736) (55,045) (69,644) (84,785) Fund Bal - EOY 990,081 1,593,678 1,774,850 (341,455) (164,782) (349,719) (582,360) (895,606) (1,208,118) (1,688,262) (2,230,517) (2,807,301) (3,551,856) (4,324,023) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 5.25%Project Year 20052006200720082009 58,795 2010 122,387 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,1472014 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,5222015 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,6542016 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,5092017 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,7392018$100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,0252019$68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,7672020$206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,3022021$68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,7672022$118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,7802023$123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,5312024$128,472 $128,472 $128,472 $128,472 $128,472 $128,4722025$133,611 $133,611 $133,611 $133,611 $133,6112026$138,956 $138,956 $138,956 $138,9562027$144,514 $144,514 $144,5142028$150,294 $150,2942029$156,3062030Revolving Assessment Fund Revolving Assessment Fund - Option #2A (suggested new franchise fee)2005 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030Project Cost (Street Only) - 2,700,000 3,300,000 1,100,000 2,200,000 3,300,000 3,399,000 3,500,970 3,605,999 3,714,179 3,825,604 3,940,373 4,058,584 Assessments 40%City Share- 2,700,000 3,300,000 1,100,000 2,200,000 3,300,000 3,399,000 3,500,970 3,605,999 3,714,179 3,825,604 3,940,373 4,058,584 Other project CostsTenn Courts (185,000) (150,000) (75,000) Tsfs in Market Blvd 194,751 194,751 (600,000) Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2016**** 1,200,000 2,486,095 3,316,243 3,426,504 4,982,777 6,046,765 5,920,761 5,573,289 5,076,599 4,254,012 3,304,630 2,222,606 1,001,878 Levy - From Debt Levy Schedule 384,838 2,700,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 Reduction for Other purposesRepayment 842,759 720,372 643,075 533,571 445,424 357,902 242,248 204,739 - - - - - Project Costs- (2,700,000) (3,300,000) (1,100,000) (2,200,000) (3,300,000) (3,399,000) (3,500,970) (3,605,999) (3,714,179) (3,825,604) (3,940,373) (4,058,584) Investable Balance 2,437,348 3,251,218 3,359,318 4,885,076 5,928,201 5,804,668 5,464,009 4,977,058 4,170,600 3,239,833 2,179,025 982,233 (356,706) MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest48,747 65,024 67,186 97,702 118,564 116,093 109,280 99,541 83,412 64,797 43,581 19,645 (7,134) Fund Bal - EOY 2,486,095 3,316,243 3,426,504 4,982,777 6,046,765 5,920,761 5,573,289 5,076,599 4,254,012 3,304,630 2,222,606 1,001,878 (363,840) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 5.25%Project Year 200520062007200820092010 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 2012 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,1472014 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,5222015 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,6542016 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,5092017 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,73920182019202020211 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, May 14, 2018 Subject Identify Key Strategies for Downtown Vision Plan Section 5:30 P.M. WORK SESSION TO BE HELD IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS Item No: A.3. Prepared By Kate Aanenson, AICP, Community Development Director File No: GEN 133 BACKGROUND After the last review of the Vision Plan which included a summary of engagement activities and the online questionnaire, the next step would be to formalize the report. In order to organize and prioritize the implementation steps, staff is asking the City Council to rank the attached implementation steps. ANALYSIS The rankings will be sent to our consultant, Bryan Harjes of HKGI, where they will be compiled. The consensus of the rankings will then be part of the final draft which will be presented to the City Council. ATTACHMENTS: Downtown Vision Ranking Pages Implementation - Connections Enhance crosswalks and pedestrian landing areas along major streets in the Downtown (Hwy 5, 78th Street, Market Blvd. Great Plains Blvd, etc.). Implementing a “pedestrian priority phase” for signalized intersections allowing a head start for people walking or bicycling across the street. (already underway) Enhancement of sidewalks, plazas, and other connections between particular developments in Downtown, to encourage walking and biking from destination to destination. Enhanced private walkways to connect storefronts to the walkways and trails located in the public right-of-way. Maintain lower traffic speeds in the Downtown area. Comments: Implementation – Public Realm Consider the creation of a City-led plan for public spaces (including plans for new public streets and enhanced streetscapes, and potential civic plazas or gathering places) that includes conceptual plans, cost estimates, and schedules for completion, as development in the Downtown area proceeds. Consider the creation of a formal future street and mobility plan for Downtown, which would formally establish the future alignments for internal roads (as well as sidewalks and promenades) that would connect the different districts within downtown. Encourage additional landscaping, boulevard trees, site furnishings, seasonal decor, unique paving and pedestrian scaled lighting to enhance the pedestrian experience. Comments: Implementation – Sub-Districts Further articulation of the sub-districts as identified in the Downtown Vision Plan to help guide expectations for urban design and development aesthetics within the Downtown area. Consider the refinement of the identified sub-districts to determine desired locations for mixed use projects in the Downtown area. Consider the creation of a formal incentives policy for Downtown, including potentially a formal scoring system in which projects that meet specific criteria tied to the Downtown Vision (in terms of enhancing the aesthetic appeal of Downtown, walkability, and other factors) would achieve better scores and therefore have a better chance of gaining approval of incentives. Comments: Implementation - Design Consider Design Guidelines on a sub-district basis that articulate the desired height & relationship to the street for buildings, public realm features and overall design aesthetic to help guide the quality and character expected within the different sub-districts of Downtown. Consider changes in zoning requirements for various sub-districts within Downtown, articulating the desired mix of uses, height and scale for buildings in Downtown. Consider a reduction in parking requirements for mixed use and retail projects in Downtown. Consider the facilitation of shared parking arrangements between different property owners in Downtown, particularly with mixed use projects combining retail, office and residential. Consider working with property owners across the downtown to create a “park once” environment, in which visitors could park in one location and traverse from business to business in Downtown Chanhassen without driving, in order to minimize traffic congestion. Comments: Implementation - Outreach Consider efforts for on-going recruit of entertainment-oriented and unique specialty tenants (i.e. brewery/distillery or other restaurants/entertainment) to locate downtown districts • Work with prospective developers to integrate restaurant or entertainment uses within their projects. Consider recruitment of developers experienced in mixed-use to explore and pursue projects in Downtown Chanhassen. Ongoing networking with and recruitment of developers to consider project opportunities in the Downtown Chanhassen area • Ongoing interaction at regional development organizations such as Urban Land Institute (ULI) and at national conferences such as the International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC). Comments: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, May 14, 2018 Subject Presentation of Certificates of Appreciation to Outgoing Commissioners Section PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS Item No: C.1. Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, Office Manager File No: SUMMARY Barbara Chadwick, Senior Commission (20172018) Jennifer Hougham, Park & Recreation Commission (2015 2018) David Hess, Environmental Commission (20152018) Charlotte Chappell, Environmental Commission (20162018) ATTACHMENTS: Barbara Chadwick Bio Jennifer Hougham Bio David Hess Bio Charlotte Chappell Bio BARBARA CHADWICK – SENIOR COMMISSION Barbara Chadwick was appointed to the Senior Commission in 2017 and has been a valued member of the commission. Her accomplishments include: • Volunteered and was an active member of ACT on Alzheimer’s • Volunteered at numerous city functions such as 4th of July Celebration events The seniors in Chanhassen are very fortunate and honored to have had you on their team. Thank you, Barbara! JENNIFER HOUGHAM – PARK & RECREATION COMMISSION Jennifer Hougham served as a member of the Park & Recreation Commission from 2015 - 2018. Jennifer was a tremendous asset to the commission and served residents with enthusiasm and pride. She provided insightful comments and recommendations during meetings and was always eager to hear from residents. When Jennifer joined the commission, she signed up her entire family! Together they attended many community events and programs sponsored by the city. Jennifer was a steady voice when developing the annual park and trail capital improvement plan CIP and famously advocated for more “real” bathrooms in our parks! Our recreation programming team appreciated Jennifer’s willingness to volunteer at multiple community special events. The community of Chanhassen is a better place as a result of Jennifer’s desire to serve and make a difference! David Hess – Environmental Commission David Hess was appointed to the Environmental Commission in 2015 and served a full term on the commission. He was a dedicated member who volunteered his time on behalf of the commission at events such as Arbor Day, Fall Community Service events and the July 3rd Business Expo. During his tenure, the commission accomplished many tasks, including an annual Sustainability Report and an Arbor Day Photo Contest. Charlotte Chappell – Environmental Commission Charlotte Chappell was appointed to the Environmental Commission in 2016. She served as the Chair of the commission for the second half of her term and brought passion, dedication, and creativity to the commission. During her term, the commission accomplished a number of projects which included the planning of natural resources presentations at the library, the annual Arbor Day Poster Contest and Sustainability Report. She also volunteered her time at the annual city Arbor Day event, July 3rd business expo and provided input for the revision of the city’s comprehensive plan natural resources section. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, May 14, 2018 Subject Presentation of Maple Leaf Award to Senior Commissioner Camille Swanson (20122017) Section PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS Item No: C.2. Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, Office Manager File No: ATTACHMENTS: Camille Swanson Bio CAMILLE SWANSON – SENIOR COMMISSION Camille Swanson was appointed to the Senior Commission in 2012 and has been an instrumental member of the commission. His accomplishments include: • Monthly articles to the Chanhassen Villager Newspaper • Volunteered on the 4th of July Bingo event sponsored by the Commission • Volunteered and became a certified technician for CarFit to assist the elderly in making their cars fit their needs The seniors in Chanhassen are very fortunate and honored to have had you on their team. Thank you, Camille! CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, May 14, 2018 Subject Approval of City Council Minutes dated April 23, 2018 Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.1. Prepared By Nann Opheim, City Recorder File No: N/A PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves the City Council Minutes dated April 23, 2018." Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. ATTACHMENTS: City Council Work Session Minutes dated April 23, 2018 City Council Summary Minutes dated April 23, 2018 City Council Verbatim Minutes dated April 23, 2018 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION APRIL 23, 2018 Mayor Laufenburger called the work session to order at 5:00 p.m. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Laufenburger, Councilwoman Tjornhom, Councilman McDonald, Councilwoman Ryan, and Councilman Campion STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Chelsea Petersen, Kate Aanenson, Todd Hoffman, Sharmeen Al-Jaff, MacKenzie Walters and Vanessa Strong PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: Mark Undestad, Steve Weick, Nancy Madsen, Mark Randall and Mike McGonagill PUBLIC PRESENT: Maryanne Halama 620 Creekwood JOINT MEETING WITH PLANNING COMMISSION. After introductions Kate Aanenson reviewed items outlined in the staff report regarding the Comprehensive Plan public comment update, and storm water review update. Mayor Laufenburger asked for clarification on the timeline for approval and review of the Comprehensive Plan. Kate Aanenson and Todd Gerhardt provided an update on a meeting held regarding the Avienda project and associated changes in the PUD which will trigger a PUD amendment. Kate Aanenson discussed the joint tour scheduled in the summer with other city commissions. Vice Chair Weick reviewed highlights from the Planning Commission’s work plan for 2018 after thanking staff for conducting the joint tours and the work they do for the Planning Commission. Todd Gerhardt suggested a joint walking tour of Prince’s property should development of that property move forward. (The City Council took a short recess at this point in the work session.) KEY FINANCIAL STRATEGY: DOWNTOWN FOCUS UPDATE. Mayor Laufenburger introduced Braedon Johnson, a student at Chanhassen High School who provided background information on his future interest in politics. Bryan Harjes with Hoisington-Koegler Group Inc. reviewed a summary of the community engagement activities, online questionnaire summary, implementation preview and schedule moving forward with the downtown vision plan. Mayor Laufenburger asked about the comment stating new development should add to the quality of the downtown experience. Councilwoman Ryan asked where the original vision statements came from and concern that some of the respondents were confused in City Council Work Session – April 23, 2018 2 the questions by their answers. Bryan Harjes continued highlighting results from questionnaire summary. Mayor Laufenburger suggested additional wordsmithing with the vision statements. Bryan Harjes continued with review of results from the questionnaire regarding guiding principles. Todd Gerhardt asked for clarification regarding the length of walkability for the pedestrian network. Bryan Harjes continued with highlights from the guiding principles summary results, desirable development character for downtown, land use districts and where housing can be added, reaction to the recently approved Aldi/Venue project, and other elements for the City to consider in future development. He reviewed implementation for enhanced crosswalks and pedestrian network, public spaces, sub-districts, design guidelines, and continued outreach. Councilman McDonald asked how this proposed plan can be implemented. Mayor Laufenburger asked that further dialogue be conducted on this plan in a future workshop setting with council members and staff. The work session was recessed at 6:50 p.m. It was reconvened at 8:00 p.m. CODE AMENDMENTS DISCUSSION: BREWERY, PERVIOUS PAVERS, BEES, BUSINESS FRINGE DISTRICT AND ADULT DAYCARE. Kate Aanenson provided background information on the items being presented for code amendments. MacKenzie Walters started with discussion of the need to amend the city code pertaining to beekeeping, adult day care, signage to permit pick up areas in commercial development, and conditional use permits in the Business Fringe District. After questions from council members further research will be done on the Business Fringe regulations. MacKenzie Walters continued with discussion of proposed changes to address pervious pavers in the RSF District, non-shoreland parcels, and discussion of proposed changes to allow craft alcohol production with certain zoning standards. Kate Aanenson clarified that staff is looking for direction on which items can move forward to hold public hearings at the Planning Commission. Councilman Campion asked about regulations regarding food trucks. Mayor Laufenburger adjourned the work session meeting at 8:50 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES APRIL 23, 2018 Mayor Laufenburger called the meeting to order at 7:05 pm. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Laufenburger, Councilwoman Tjornhom, Councilman McDonald, Councilwoman Ryan, and Councilman Campion STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Chelsea Petersen, Kate Aanenson, George Bender, Todd Hoffman, Jill Sinclair, and Roger Knutson PUBLIC PRESENT: Gene Hanson 2380 Lamplight Drive, Woodbury Jeff Taylor 16809 Saddlewood, Minnetonka Gail C. Eden Prairie Anders Syverson 1725 Hemlock Way Keith Butcher 1770 Pheasant Circle PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: Mayor Laufenburger read an invitation to the Arbor Day Celebration being held on Saturday, May 5th at Power Hill Park and congratulated the following winners of the Arbor Day Poster Contest: From St. Hubert School: • Rebecca Knuff • Lucy Carraux From Bluff Creek Elementary: • Margaux Fitzgibbons • Keirsten Bussler • Josh Johnson • Emma Bloom • Ethan Holthusen • Finn Standley • Gwen Erickson • Antonia Wachter • Kaelie Taylor City Council Summary – April 23, 2018 2 And the Grand Prize Winner Elle Hanson-Syverson from Bluff Creek Elementary. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilwoman Ryan moved, Councilman Campion seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager’s recommendations: 1. Approval of the City Council Minutes dated April 9, 2018 2. Receive Park and Recreation Commission Minutes dated March 27, 2018 3. Receive Planning Commission Work Session Minutes dated April 3, 2018 4. Resolution #2018-30: Resolution Proclaiming May 5th as Arbor Day 5. Approval of Temporary On-Sale Liquor License, The Rotary Club of Chanhassen, Chanhassen Dinner Theaters 50th Anniversary, June 18, 2018 6. Approve Agreement with Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District for Water Reuse at Lake Susan Park Ballfield 7. Resolution #2018-31: Authorize Entering into Cooperative Landscaping Agreement No. 1030901 with MnDOT for a Community Roadside Landscape Partnership Program, State Project No. 1004-969 8. Approve Mission Hills 3rd Addition Revised Plat and Development Contract 9. Resolution #2018-32: Approving Quote for Lake Lucy Lane Storm Sewer Improvement 10. Approval of Temporary On-Sale Liquor License, Chanhassen Evening Rotary Club, Corn Hole Tournament, May 19, 2018 All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. None. FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE. Lt. Eric Kittelson provided monthly updates for the March crime statistics, including training and community relations. Councilwoman Ryan asked for clarification on how statistics are kept for opioid overdoses where Narcan is administered. Assistant Chief Steve Smith provided updates on staffing, calls for service, training, assistance to Victoria for a special event, assistance to the Lion’s Club for the Annual Pancake Breakfast, and highlights from the Fire Marshall’s report. City Council Summary – April 23, 2018 3 PUBLIC HEARING: APPROVE RESOLUTION VACATING PUBLIC RIGHT-OF- WAY OF TOWN ROAD. George Bender presented the staff report on this item. Mayor Laufenburger opened the public hearing. No one spoke and the public hearing was closed. Resolution #2018-33: Councilman McDonald moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded that the City Council adopts a resolution approving the vacation of a portion of the public right-of-way legally described as Town Road within Outlot E, Mission Hills according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. VENUE/ALDI PROPERTY: APPROVAL OF ASSENT TO REGISTRATION OF LAND. Todd Gerhardt presented the staff report on this item. Councilman McDonald moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded that the City Council approves the Assent to Registration of Land for the Venue/Aldi property. All voted in favor, except for Councilwoman Ryan and Councilman Campion who opposed, and the motion carried with a vote of 3 to 2. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS. Mayor Laufenburger discussed his participation in Eastern Carver County District 112 Foundation’s banquet for identifying the finalists for Educator of the Year and introduced Braedon Johnson, a junior at Chanhassen High School who is working with Mayor Laufenburger in a mentorship program. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Todd Gerhardt thanked residents and city staff for their patience and work during the major snowfall event on Saturday. CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION. None. Councilwoman Tjornhom moved, Councilman Campion seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The City Council meeting was adjourned at 7:55 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING APRIL 23, 2018 Mayor Laufenburger called the meeting to order at 7:05 pm. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Laufenburger, Councilwoman Tjornhom, Councilman McDonald, Councilwoman Ryan, and Councilman Campion STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Chelsea Petersen, Kate Aanenson, George Bender, Todd Hoffman, Jill Sinclair, and Roger Knutson PUBLIC PRESENT: Gene Hanson 2380 Lamplight Drive, Woodbury Jeff Taylor 16809 Saddlewood, Minnetonka Gail C. Eden Prairie Anders Syverson 1725 Hemlock Way Keith Butcher 1770 Pheasant Circle Mayor Laufenburger: Well thank you and welcome to the Chanhassen City Council meeting. Those of you that are in the chambers and as well as those of you that are watching online on Mediacom cable channel or through Livestream from our website. Just for the record all members of the council are present this evening and for those of you that are at home or at your office watching this we probably have around 80 residents of our community, young and old alike that are here for various reasons and I think we’re going to have a lot of fun tonight so. First of all council members you have a printed agenda in front of you. Is there any modification to the agenda as printed? There being none then we will proceed with the agenda as it’s listed. The first item on our agenda tonight is public announcements. PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: Mayor Laufenburger: Ladies and gentlemen I have in front of me a public announcement regarding an upcoming Arbor Day. In 1876 Minnesota became the fourth state to adopt Arbor Day as an annual celebration. Today Chanhassen celebrates Arbor Day each year in order to set aside a time to consider what trees do for us at our community. Planting trees adds beauty and character to our neighborhoods. It reduces energy costs. It increases property values. It reduced pollution and replaces trees that we’ve lost in our community. Perhaps Elton Trueblood said it best when he wrote these words. A man has finally begun to discover the meaning of human life when he plants a tree under which he knows full well he will never sit. Let us plant trees today, the trees of tomorrow. I invite all residents, their families and friends to Chanhassen’s Arbor Day event on Saturday, May 5th. I think that’s one week from this Saturday. Is that, is my Chanhassen City Council – April 23, 2018 2 calendar correct Jill? And we will be convening at Power Hill Park in the, I call it the bird neighborhood. Anybody live in the bird neighborhood? Come to Power Hill Park. It’s a great sledding hill too by the way. We will gather at 9:00 a.m. at the parking lot for a welcome and a planting demonstration. Volunteers will plant 20 trees around the park. Refreshments and tree related information will be available before and after the plantings and the event will be held rain or shine, and I supposed I should say rain, snow or shine so be sure to dress for the weather and the work. Please bring a shovel if you can. I encourage everyone to come to this free event and help plant a tree on Arbor Day. Thanks Jill for those words. Now I’m about to announce the winners but first let me begin with this. On behalf of the Chanhassen City Council and the Environmental Commission I would like to congratulate all of the winners of this year’s Arbor Day Poster Contest. The City has been sponsoring this contest for 19 years in order to express our commitment to trees in our community. Every year local fifth graders are invited to submit their drawings based on an annual theme. The theme for 2018 was, I probably should ask all of you. I think you know. Trees are Terrific and Need our Care. In a moment I’m going to step out front and we have 2 Environmental Commission members with us this evening. Kristen Fulkerson and Keith Butcher. Will you just join me up here? I think each of these individuals are going to want to have their picture taken don’t you think Jill? Jill Sinclair: Yeah we can have a photo. Mayor Laufenburger: I think there’s families out here. Do families have cameras with you? So you may want to queue yourself up here for a picture because when I call these names we’re going to get a congratulation shake from Kristen, from myself and Keith and then they’re going to stay up here. Okay so let’s try it like that and see how it goes. So the City would like to thank all of the students from Bluff Creek Elementary and St. Hubert School for their wonderful drawings. The City would also like to thank the Garden for their generous donation of a gift card for the grand prize winner. The framed winning picture will hang in City Hall along with the past winners so as I call your name I’m going to have you come up. You’re going to pause here for a picture and then you can, we’re going to have you step over there or over here and then when everybody’s up here we’re going to get a big group picture. Alright so first of all from St. Hubert School, Rebecca Knuff. Are you here Rebecca? Also from St. Hubert School Lucy Carraux. Now from Bluff Creek Elementary, Margaux Fitzgibbons. Margaux are you here? Congratulations Margaux. Todd Gerhardt: Margaux are you tired from doing cartwheels? Mayor Laufenburger: The comment was, Margaux are you tired from doing cartwheels. She was noticed doing cartwheels out on the plaza. Also from Bluff Creek Keirsten Bussler. We’ll make sure she gets that. Josh Johnson. Josh. There we go. Emma Bloom. Emma are you here? How appropriate is Emma for Arbor Day? Bloom. Alright. Ethan Holthusen. Finn Standley. Finn are you here? Gwen Erickson. Is Gwen here? Next we have Antonia Wachter. And then Kaelie Taylor. Now all of these students that I’ve announced are runners up in the contest and I now invite the grand prize winner Elle Hanson-Syverson. Okay and I think Elle you also get a Chanhassen City Council – April 23, 2018 3 gift card from The Garden. Look at that. Now Elle what I’m going to do here, I’m going to ask you to stand right in front of me and then kids if you can just gather right next to her. Jill Sinclair: And if you can hold up your posters. Mayor Laufenburger: And hold up your posters, exactly right. Can you move in just a little bit more over here, okay. Well let’s give a hand to all of the kids. …because trees are terrific and need our care. We’re just going to pause for a second. I know this is a thrilling council meeting but you have other plans tonight. How many are going to the Timberwolves game? Anybody? Alright we’re back in session here. Next item on our agenda this evening is the consent agenda. CONSENT AGENDA: Mayor Laufenburger: Tonight we have consent agenda items E(1) through (10). Is there any item that council or visitors would like to be considered separately? Susan Mallara: Yes I’d like to consider one separate. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Would you please step up to the microphone. Just state your name. Susan Mallara: Yeah my name is Susan Mallara. I’m a resident of Chanhassen and I was made aware after Resolution 2018-29 was passed on April 9th. Mayor Laufenburger: Is that just Susan for a moment. Is there an item E(1) through (10) that you would like to take off the agenda? Susan Mallara: The approval of the City Council Minutes dated April 9th includes Resolution 2018-29. It’s been brought to my attention that there was no opportunity for discussion with the School nor with the community prior to this. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay Susan let me just stop you just for a second. I appreciate what you’re trying to do. Susan Mallara: Yep. Mayor Laufenburger: The Minutes are actually an actual record of the meeting. Susan Mallara: Okay. Mayor Laufenburger: And as such, unless there’s a modification to what actually took place in the Minutes then it makes no sense for it to be off the consent agenda. Now if you feel that there’s something that is reported inaccurately. Not procedurally inaccurately but if there’s Chanhassen City Council – April 23, 2018 4 something that’s reported inaccurately then it would make sense for us to delve into that. Otherwise the item that you want to discuss can be discussed with city staff or with council members but it’s not up for discussion this evening Susan. Susan Mallara: Okay. So I do believe that there’s an inaccuracy in the resolution and the way that it was written that there are transportation safety issues. Mayor Laufenburger: But the Minutes. Susan Mallara: Right, right, okay I understand. Mayor Laufenburger: Are simply reporting what took place. Susan Mallara: Yeah, okay. So what I hear you saying is the proper process, I attempted to confirm this prior to the meeting is to call a meeting with the city planner. Mayor Laufenburger: City planner or you’re certainly welcomed to speak with the City Manager or any of the council members regarding this matter. Susan Mallara: Okay. Can you give me the names of those people or. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Gerhardt. You can call City Hall at 952. Susan Mallara: Yep I know. I talked to Paul last week so. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Gerhardt, Mr. Oehme or… Susan Mallara: Okay, okay. And ask for an official meeting. Mayor Laufenburger: You’re welcomed to ask for a meeting and then they would help us determine whether or not it needs to be reconsidered. Susan Mallara: Okay. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay? Thank you Susan. Susan Mallara: So the only way that it can be reconsidered is if the City Manager says that it can be reconsidered despite the fact that. Mayor Laufenburger: I would ask, I would ask that you present your case to the City Manager or to council members and if the consensus is that that matter should be reconsidered then we would reconsider it. Chanhassen City Council – April 23, 2018 5 Susan Mallara: Okay. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay? Susan Mallara: And how do I present to council members? In this meeting or? Mayor Laufenburger: All of the council members are, all of the council member’s contact information is on the city website. Susan Mallara: Okay, so individual meetings with each of the individual council people. Mayor Laufenburger: That’s up to you. Susan Mallara: Okay. Mayor Laufenburger: Up to your choice. Susan Mallara: Yeah I know how to find your information, thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Thanks Susan. Is there any other item? Councilman Campion: Mr. Mayor? Mayor Laufenburger: Yes. Councilman Campion: I mean if she wanted to couldn’t she present during visitor presentation? Mayor Laufenburger: That is very correct Mr. Campion. Because it’s not on the agenda she can speak to us during the visitor presentations. Susan Mallara: So just for the record what I would prefer to do, residents that were affected by this as well as the school was not brought into the discussion despite being asked to be brought into the discussion. What I would prefer to do is bring a united front. Bring the school and bring residents together so it’s not just myself individually presenting but Dan I do appreciate you pointing that out and we certainly will do that. It would have been nice to have been given some warning that this resolution was being drafted and there was many opportunities for the police in particular to share that information and it was specifically not done so I just want that to be on the record. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Susan. Chanhassen City Council – April 23, 2018 6 Susan Mallara: And hence while I’ll be organizing other residents who are affected by this to give a side. I have spoken with Paul and a lot of the information was not available to Paul when this was presented. And there was incorrect information that he had. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Susan. Susan Mallara: Thank you. Thank staff. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you. So is there any item E(1) through (10) that anybody would like to remove or remove from the consent agenda and consider separately? There being none may I have a motion to approve the consent agenda. Councilwoman Ryan moved, Councilman Campion seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager’s recommendations: 1. Approval of the City Council Minutes dated April 9, 2018 2. Receive Park and Recreation Commission Minutes dated March 27, 2018 3. Receive Planning Commission Work Session Minutes dated April 3, 2018 4. Resolution #2018-30: Resolution Proclaiming May 5th as Arbor Day 5. Approval of Temporary On-Sale Liquor License, The Rotary Club of Chanhassen, Chanhassen Dinner Theaters 50th Anniversary, June 18, 2018 6. Approve Agreement with Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District for Water Reuse at Lake Susan Park Ballfield 7. Resolution #2018-31: Authorize Entering into Cooperative Landscaping Agreement No. 1030901 with MnDOT for a Community Roadside Landscape Partnership Program, State Project No. 1004-969 8. Approve Mission Hills 3rd Addition Revised Plat and Development Contract 9. Resolution #2018-32: Approving Quote for Lake Lucy Lane Storm Sewer Improvement 10. Approval of Temporary On-Sale Liquor License, Chanhassen Evening Rotary Club, Corn Hole Tournament, May 19, 2018 All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Chanhassen City Council – April 23, 2018 7 VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. Mayor Laufenburger: At this time anyone wishing to address the council on a matter that is not on the agenda for this evening would you please step to the podium stating your name and address for the record. And as Mr. Campion so correctly pointed out, this is a time where anyone can address the council on an item that is not on the agenda and you’re correct, this would have been a very good time had there been an organized presentation for her to make that and I would ask that as a minimum Mr. Gerhardt if Susan Mallara, if she approaches you make sure she knows that she’s welcomed to do that. And even if the item is not on the agenda she’s welcomed to present her case during a visitor presentation. Okay. Alright thank you Mr. Gerhardt. There being no visitor presentations at this time I’ll close visitor presentations and move to our next item on the agenda. And by the way we are, just for the record there was an item listed for a legislative update from Senator Jensen. He will not be able to be with us tonight. He’ll schedule that for May or June for a make-up. FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE. Mayor Laufenburger: The next item is our monthly fire department and law enforcement update. Let’s begin with our law enforcement update. Lieutenant Kittelson. Lt. Eric Kittelson: Good evening Mr. Mayor, council members. I have the monthly law enforcement update for you this evening. Monthly calls for service March summary. There was 57 Group A crimes, 11 Group B crimes, 373 miscellaneous and non-criminal calls for service, 394 total traffic incidents, 77 administrative tasks for a total of 912 calls for service in the month of March. Arrests, citations and verbal warning summary. 28 individuals were arrested and charged with 39 crimes in 25 separate incidents. The 3 top offenses were DUI, theft and drug violations. There was 102 citations issued. 23 for speed, 21 winter parking, 13 no proof of insurance were the top 3. Verbal warnings, there was 210 verbal warnings issued in the month of March with 184 of those being on traffic stops. Training update. Staff will begin to attend extensive training at the end of April and in May to assist in dealing with individuals in mental health crisis. The training is through Minnesota CIT and is a 40 hour training course and all of our staff in the entire sheriff’s office, including Chanhassen division will have attended by the end of September. Community relations. On April 19th Detective Possard presented a fraud and scam awareness presentation at Centennial Hill. Deputies assisted at the Celebration events at Paisley Park April 19th through April 22nd. This coming Friday in and near City Hall will be on April 27th Chanhassen Elementary is hosting their annual Fun Run at 4:30 p.m. It is all on the paths and sidewalks but still be aware that there will be additional kids running around kind of north up to Kerber and back so just be extra cautious in the area on that day. Mayor Laufenburger: What is that date again? Lt. Eric Kittelson: This Friday, April 27th at 4:30 and our deputies are always out there and have a good time with them and they have a little event in the parking lot afterwards. And then this Chanhassen City Council – April 23, 2018 8 coming Saturday, April 28th I believe that’s the rescheduled date Mr. Hoffman for the weather delay. April 28th from 10:00 to noon at Lake Ann Park the Southwest Metro Chamber of Commerce will host their Walk Fur Education and Deputy Mueller and his canine partner Ringo will be in attendance as well so if you want to see Ringo and Deputy Mueller that would be a good opportunity as well as supporting that cause so that concludes my report and I’ll stand for questions. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright, any questions for Lieutenant Kittelson? Lieutenant Kittelson you mentioned that you had some staff deployed to Celebration at Paisley Park this weekend. There was about I think as many as 4,000 or 5,000 people that passed through Chanhassen to participate. Were there any specific incidents that you detected? Lt. Eric Kittelson: No, it was very uneventful. Lieutenant Pufahl worked a 12 hour shift there on Saturday and 2 news agencies showed up for a couple hours but the traffic plan is working. Has worked wonderfully ever since the beginning of the transition to the museum and there was little to no foot traffic in the area that day and everyone followed the public transportation plan as well as the busing plan there so it went very, very well. Mayor Laufenburger: No news is good news. Lt. Eric Kittelson: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you very much Lieutenant Kittelson. Lt. Eric Kittelson: Thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Please Councilmember Ryan. Councilwoman Ryan: Thank you. As we get your reports every week I’ve noticed a slight uptick but noticeable citations or situations involving opioid abuse and my question is, obviously it gets reported if there is a death due to overdose. What do, how do you report to the State for tracking purposes if there is a situation like I think recently where you revived someone by using Narcan. How is that reported or tracked for State purposes? Lt. Eric Kittelson: To my knowledge it’s not tracked or reported to the State. We do track it ourselves in the county level and as you mentioned on Saturday we did have a save so Narcan is an opioid antagonist. It reverses the effects or blocks the opioids from attaching to the receptors in the brain so, but we did have an overdose situation on Saturday and 2 deputies arrived to administer Narcan properly and did revive the person. So there is some legislation I think being proposed to get a more unified reporting system. However as you all know we’ve been in NIBRS for about, it will be 24 months so we’ll have a year to year comparison starting this June and we are still one of the first pilot programs for that and those are the types of things that are Chanhassen City Council – April 23, 2018 9 reported in the new system so until you have the entire State on that system you probably would have some inconsistent tracking on that I believe. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Lt. Eric Kittelson: And there are still new departments coming onboard almost every day. I think there was just a new story Minneapolis Police Department started carrying it about 2 months ago in one of their four precincts so there are still some departments who are still training and getting that option available to the first responders. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay great, thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Councilmember Ryan. Next we’ll get our monthly fire department update and we have Assistant Chief Steve Smith with us. Is that correct? Assistant Chief Steve Smith: That is correct. Good evening Mayor and council members. Mayor Laufenburger: Nice to see you. Assistant Chief Steve Smith: Yeah. My first time doing this so hopefully… Mayor Laufenburger: Just take a deep breath and rarely, rarely do we whip anybody for failure to do this properly. Assistant Chief Steve Smith: Okay, that’s good to know. I’m subbing for Chief Murphy who is subbing for Don so it falls downhill quickly. I have the privilege of presenting the fire report here this month. The staffing is at 39 of 45 paid on call firefighters. One firefighter has been placed on medical leave for a non-workplace injury. The current hiring process is underway. We had 7 applicants in attendance at the informational meeting on Tuesday, April 10th. The candidates took part in department interviews and pre-placement physical agility tests this past Saturday. Successful candidates will be given a conditional offer. They must complete a medical, physical, psychological assessment and criminal background check. Tentative start date will be June 4, 2018. Mayor Laufenburger: And Chief Smith, these 7 are not included in the 39 is that correct? Assistant Chief Steve Smith: That is correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Assistant Chief Steve Smith: The probation firefighters from last year’s group are just completing the final phases of training this month and we are excited to get them in line and participating with us in call response and training. Doing a great job. As far as call response Chanhassen City Council – April 23, 2018 10 goes, the fire department responded to 66 calls for service in March. Year to date calls are up 11 percent over last year at this time. Duty crews have responded to 11 calls in March for a total of 31 calls over the, in 2018. Significant calls include 33 EMS calls with 4 motor vehicle accidents. 3 fire responses. One auto aid request to Eden Prairie which included a chief and an engine. And 2 responses to the dilapidated barn on Highway 5 which you may have been aware of. Conditions to the barn have been extremely difficult to extinguish that fire and we’re currently working with the property owner to take down that barn prior to the busy grass fire season. Training. Training that occurred since Chief Johnson’s last update. We had some advanced auto extrication training which is always a fun time. You may have seen those cars in our parking lot. Officer pre-plan tour of Power Ridge Apartments. Firefighter skills at the aforementioned Frontier Building. We’ve done some work in there. We had planned to do it today but the contractor this morning said we couldn’t go in there so we had to shuffle a little bit today. Tonight. Firefighters safety and entanglement training as part of the State Fire Marshal training prop was conducted also. Other activities include second round of training to the Bernard Group with employee hands on for CPR training and assist a Victoria fire for standby for city coverage for a special event that they were attending. And then assist with the Lion’s on April 8th for their Annual Pancake Breakfast which by all accounts was a success. Update from the Fire Marshal. This kind of written in his, from his perspective so if I use the wrong nouns forgive me. He’s finally able to start teaching his hands on, which he’s been very motivated about. It’s been wide success. He’s instructed 2 classes at the Bernard Group. The classes were well attended and well received. Several of our firefighters attended to assist in the training with hopes of getting them trained to instruct the course itself in the near future to be able to expand our offering of this type of training to our community. The Bernard Group called the next day after that training to schedule 2 more training sessions for April and asked if this was something that we could offer on an annual basis. We will be looking to continue and expand this further into the community in the very near future. A Kidde Smoke Detector recall notice was issued for a residential smoke alarms. Public education piece was developed by Chanhassen Fire and released via social media to our community. Mayor Laufenburger: And just let me stop you there. Was that also released to newspaper do you know? Assistant Chief Steve Smith: I don’t know that. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Just make note of that. We have a member of the local news media present. If there’s something that residents should be doing and they don’t happen to have social media. Do you have something in the form, something written regarding this recall? Assistant Chief Steve Smith: I’m the messenger. I’ll let Fir Marshal Nutter know that. Mayor Laufenburger: Let him know that so that he can connect with the people at the Villager so that that information gets out to the public. Chanhassen City Council – April 23, 2018 11 Assistant Chief Steve Smith: That’s specifically routing the smoke detectors. Mayor Laufenburger: Yeah specifically regarding the smoke detectors. That’s a recall because if it’s residential I’m sure there are people who have those smoke detectors in their home. Assistant Chief Steve Smith: Correct. That’s a very popular smoke detector. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright, thank you. Assistant Chief Steve Smith: Alright Fire Marshal Nutter was able to attend an advanced course on Youth Firesetting Prevention in St. Cloud in March where they discussed improvements and changes to fire prevention programs for fire departments state and nationwide and he will be expanding our fire prevention message to include older children and teenagers this year. Fire investigations. We had a small fire in the abandoned old barn that we previously talked about near Paisley Park and it’s had several rekindles during the month of March. A short investigation discovered that it was most likely an arson but with minimal damage and no injuries and concerning the nature of the structure the cause and origin could not be conclusively determined due to the hazards of entering the dilapidated structure. Chanhassen Fire is working with the landowner, as aforementioned to have the structure on the lot torn down and avoid further issues. And Fire Marshal Nutter will attend the Minnesota International Association of Arson Investigations Conference in St. Cloud in March. That’s what he did do I guess for that one. It’s a great training and networking with other fire investigators. Fire Marshal Nutter also would like to point out that he’s starting to see a large influx of plans coming in for construction projects and remodels this spring. Some more notable projects include Mission Hills Senior Living Center, the Aldi store plans have been reviewed and approved. Panera store plans have been reviewed and approved. West Park II sales center was finalled and approved and Emerson, inspections were completed and a plan approved for temporary use of part of the facility for interviews. Finishing up Fire Marshal Nutter’s notes here. Chief Johnson and Fire Marshal Nutter are finished up all the annual inspections for businesses who renew or apply for liquor licensing. I know that was a large task for those gentlemen. We are now working through re- inspections of the violations noted in each of the buildings. This is the first year Chanhassen has required these inspections for this type of business. It was a good start to this program to be able to work with the businesses and building owners to strategize how to deal with fire code issues for the future and develop that working relationship. Although several businesses had many violations that were noted we were able to educate them on how to make the business safer for their employees and their customers. And then finally here, March is traditionally a very busy training month for us. We’ve attended several classes in order to meet the national standards for EMT recertification. We also developed and instructed two large auto extrication trainings for our department and we had to use that in April actually a couple times so it is timely training. And that concludes the fire report and I’ll stand for questions. Chanhassen City Council – April 23, 2018 12 Mayor Laufenburger: Alright, thank you Chief Smith. Any questions for Chief Smith? I would say you can put that whip away. I think you did just fine. Duly reported to Don Johnson too. Thanks Steve. Assistant Chief Steve Smith: Alright, you’re welcomed. Mayor Laufenburger: Have a good evening. Thank you very much. Assistant Chief Steve Smith: Yep. PUBLIC HEARING: APPROVE RESOLUTION VACATING PUBLIC RIGHT-OF- WAY OF TOWN ROAD. Mayor Laufenburger: And who’s is this this evening? George Bender: This is engineering’s. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright, thanks Mr. Bender. George Bender. Nice to have you with us this evening. George Bender: Thank you very much. Mayor Laufenburger: Staff report please. George Bender: I have short power point surrounding, or about this item. It’s for a vacation of the right-of-way for the Mission Hills 3rd Addition development. Mayor Laufenburger: Just for clarification, this is the Mission Hills Senior Living property is that correct? George Bender: That is correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. George Bender: The Mission Hills Senior Living was originally platted in 1994 and that included Outlot E. Outlot E is currently being developed as the 3rd Addition for the Mission Hills Senior Living Center. On the 1994 plat was right-of-way for Town Road. I have a map that will help you visualize where this is along the section line. This area when it was, the preliminary survey was done was not picked up and between the preliminary survey and the final plat this was identified and it would be in the way of the development moving forward and placing a building in the area. There is no future use for this right-of-way with 86th Street being just to the north of the Outlot and being a much safer intersection with 101. And so the right-of- Chanhassen City Council – April 23, 2018 13 way you know needs to be vacated and that’s what the public, this tonight’s public hearing is about. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Anything else Mr. Bender? George Bender: No, that pretty much covers it. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright. Any questions for staff regarding the vacation of this road that was platted on the property and essentially what we’re doing is we’re just releasing any requirements for this, that the City would have for this road is that correct? George Bender: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. Any questions for staff? Alright at this time I would like to open a public hearing. If there’s anybody present that would like to speak in, regarding this matter of vacating this right-of-way for Town Road in the Mission Hills Outlot E or now Subdivision 3. Third subdivision. Please step forward at this time. Alright there being none I’m going to close the public hearing and bring it back to council. Council at this time if you have any questions, comments or any motions you’d like to make. Councilman McDonald: Mr. Mayor I’ll make a motion. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright, and that motion is? Councilman McDonald: I would propose the City Council adopts a resolution approving the vacation of a portion of the public right-of-way legally described as Town Road within Outlot E, Mission Hills according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. I don’t see a Findings of Fact so we don’t need to incorporate Findings of Fact. Correct Mr. Knutson? Roger Knutson: That’s correct. You just need a resolution. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright. We have a motion to approve the resolution. Is there a second? Councilwoman Tjornhom: Second. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you very much Councilmember Tjornhom. Any discussion? Resolution #2018-33: Councilman McDonald moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded that the City Council adopts a resolution approving the vacation of a portion of the public right-of-way legally described as Town Road within Outlot E, Mission Hills according to Chanhassen City Council – April 23, 2018 14 the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Mayor Laufenburger: That motion carries 5-0. Thank you Mr. Bender. George Bender: Thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: And thank you council. VENUE/ALDI PROPERTY: APPROVAL OF ASSENT TO REGISTRATION OF LAND. Mayor Laufenburger: Is this your’s Mr. Gerhardt? Todd Gerhardt: Yes Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Todd Gerhardt: Earlier as the council acted as the EDA, approved the Assent to Registration of Land for what would be the Venue and Aldi site. What was recorded against the property are several documents that the EDA approved as a part of the 1997 redevelopment of this property. The City Council the past several years decertified the TIF District and all the obligations under those agreements had been met and staff is recommending that the council assent in registration of the land for Bloomberg Companies and Frontier Development LLC. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. And Mr. Gerhardt just to restate that which was discussed in the Economic Development Authority meeting earlier this evening, what we are doing is we are simply agreeing that all of the restrictions that have been fulfilled can be removed from the title so that the new property owner, United Properties has a clean title to the development of their project, is that correct? Todd Gerhardt: That is correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Is there any questions or comments? I wonder if I would have a motion from somebody. Councilman McDonald: Mr. Mayor I’ll make the motion for this one. Mayor Laufenburger: Alrighty, thank you. Councilman McDonald: I would propose the City Council approves the Assent to Registration of Land for the Venue/Aldi property. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright. Is there a second to this motion? Chanhassen City Council – April 23, 2018 15 Councilwoman Tjornhom: Second. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright we have a motion and second. Thank you Councilmember Tjornhom. Is there any discussion at this time? Councilman McDonald moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded that the City Council approves the Assent to Registration of Land for the Venue/Aldi property. All voted in favor, except for Councilwoman Ryan and Councilman Campion who opposed, and the motion carried with a vote of 3 to 2. Mayor Laufenburger: Be noted that Councilmembers Ryan and Campion voted nay. That motion carries 3-2. Thank you very much. Do you have what you need Mr. Gerhardt to act on that? Todd Gerhardt: Yes I do Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. At this time that concludes all of our formal business. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS. Mayor Laufenburger: Is there any council presentations this evening? Well I have just a couple I’d like to speak to. Number one, yesterday I had the opportunity to participate in District 112 Foundation’s banquet for identifying the Educator of the Year in Carver County. Or Eastern Carver County School District 112 and it, this is an event that’s been taking place for I think about 17 or 18 years and the District Foundation, which is separate from the school district, they operate for a number of reasons but one of which is to accept and identify finalists for the Educator of the Year and there were 5 finalists that were identified and that were appropriately recognized at this banquet. Becky James is a teacher at Victoria Elementary School in our district. Mary Shone is a teacher at Jonathan Elementary School in our district. Dave Carlson is a teacher at Chanhassen High School in our community. Janet Hollard is a teacher at Chanhassen Elementary and Anna Edlund is a teacher at Bluff Creek Elementary School so Chanhassen was well represented in the nominations and the selection of the finalists and it was a real pleasure to participate in that process. Each of the mayors and one of the school board members were given the privilege of speaking and introducing the respective teachers. There were 5 of us that were present for the 5 finalists and I’m very pleased to report that the winner of the District 112 Educator of the Year Award goes to Anna Edlund of Chanhassen, excuse me of Bluff Creek Elementary School. I had the pleasure of meeting Anna and introducing her as a finalist and it was just a real thrill to know that there are, well there’s actually hundreds, nay I say thousands of teachers, not only in Chanhassen but also in the Minnetonka School District. All of whom are committed and dedicated to teaching our kids and this is but one small example of showing appreciation for what they do so with that I, it was a pleasure to be with that group yesterday. I have one other council presentations. A member of the Chanhassen High School Chanhassen City Council – April 23, 2018 16 student body is with us this evening. Braedon would you just stand up if you wouldn’t mind. Braedon Johnson is a junior at Chanhassen High School and Braedon and I are participating in a mentor program through Southwest Chamber of Commerce and President Jeff Fillipek initiated that program and he and I have had an opportunity to spend time together. He’s very interested in the government process and I say he’s probably seen a pretty good example of how that operates on a local level so Braedon nice to have you with us and good luck to your future. Any other council presentations at this time? Did you want to say anything about the Red Bird Rally there Mr. McDonald? Councilman McDonald: I didn’t win anything. Mayor Laufenburger: No but the Red Birds win from your contribution. Councilman McDonald: That is very true Mr. Mayor. It was a very good turnout. In fact one of the best I’ve seen in years so I’m hoping that translates to enthusiasm and attendance at the games this year. Mayor Laufenburger: Absolutely. The Red Bird Rally was held on Saturday night at the American Legion. They’re very generous with their space and it was announced that the first game of the Chanhassen Red Birds season will be on Sunday, May 13th. I think there’s some other day that’s celebrated that day. Oh yeah, in honor of Mother’s Day they’re playing baseball in Jordan at the Mini Met so you all come out. Anyway there is excitement for the Red Birds who finished second last year. Todd Gerhardt: So that’s May 13th? Mayor Laufenburger: May 13th. They knocked on the door of the State Championship and this year they’re just going to barge right through that door. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Gerhardt, any administrative presentation? Todd Gerhardt: Well it’s nice to know when Mother’s Day is that’s for sure. I would like to extend my appreciation to our residents and businesses during, not this last Saturday but the Saturday before’s major snowfall event. It can be very difficult when you get over 12 inches of snow. Our plow team was out for many hours on Saturday and Sunday and took a toll on our equipment but they did their best to try to keep the roads open. And for those people that we may have done property damage, rolled sod or did other damage, mailboxes or whatever it may be, please don’t hesitate to call me. 952-227-1119 and we’ll file a claim with our insurance company and process that through the League of Minnesota Insurance Trust so again appreciate everybody’s patience during that difficult event. Chanhassen City Council – April 23, 2018 17 Mayor Laufenburger: Alright, anything else Mr. Gerhardt? Todd Gerhardt: That’s it. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright. CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION. None. Councilwoman Tjornhom moved, Councilman Campion seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The City Council meeting was adjourned at 7:55 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, May 14, 2018 Subject Approve Temporary OnSale Liquor License, July 3 & 4,The Rotary Club of Chanhassen Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.2. Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, Office Manager File No: LIQ Chanhassen Rotary PROPOSED MOTION “The Chanhassen City Council approves the request from the Chanhassen Rotary Club for a temporary onsale intoxicating liquor license to sell alcoholic beverages at the 4th of July Celebration on July 3 & 4, 2018 in City Center Park. Approval is contingent upon the Rotary Club providing liquor liability insurance.” Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND The Chanhassen Rotary Club has submitted an application for a temporary onsale intoxicating liquor license for the 4th of July Celebration on July 3 & 4, 2018. Liquor sales will take place between 4 pm and midnight on July 3, and between 10 am and 5 pm on July 4 in City Center Park as outlined in the attached map. The Rotary would like to sell beer, wine, and malt beverages (e.g. Mike’s Hard Lemonade) as they have done for many years without incident. The club will be required to provide liquor liability insurance for the event (their policy renews on July 1st). RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Chanhassen Rotary Club’s request for a temporary onsale liquor license for the 4th of July Celebration on July 3 & 4, 2018 in City Center Park. Approval is contingent upon the provision of liquor liability insurance. ATTACHMENTS: Application and Certificate of Insurance Map Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222, St. Paul, MN 55101 651-201-7500 Fax 651-297-5259 TTY 651-282-6555 APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR A 1 DAY TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE Name of organization Date organized Tax exempt number .__lc_h_a _nh_a_s_se_n_R_o_t _a _ry _C_l_u _b ___________________ l .__I1_98_8 ______ ___.I .__ls_3_-0 _3 _9 _3 9_3 _1 _____ ___, Address City State Zip Code !Po Box 781 !Chanhassen II ,...M_i_n-ne_s_o-ta----,I1 .._5_53 _1_7 ___ _ Name of person making application Business phone Home phone .._µo_s_e_p_h _G _. S_c _o _tt _____________________ l I612-8 3 9 -3 8 00 .-----'---------. Date(s) of event Type of organization rµu_ l _y-'3-'&-4-,-20_1 _8 _________________ I IEJ Club D Charitable D Religious D Other non-profit Organization officer's name City State Zip Code '--pa_n_e_t _S_ta_n _z _ak _________________ ___,j jc hanhassen I ._IM_i _nn_e_s_ot_a ___ __,I ._1 5_53 _1 _7 ___ ___,Organization officer's name City State Zip Code '--IM_i _ke_V_o_t_a_va __________________ __, .__lc_h_a _n _ha_s_se_n ____ __.l .__IM_i _n_n _es_o_ta ___ ___.l .__js_53_1_7 ____ _, Organization officer's name City State Zip Code L..µo_s_e_p_h_G_._s _co_t _t ________________ ___, .__r_h_a _sk_a _____ �I ___ ,M_i_n _ne_s_o_ta ___ ___.l L..15_53_1_8 ___ ___,Organization officer's name City State Zip Code '--IA_n_n_e _V _o_as ___________________ l .__lc_h _a _n _ha_s_s _en ____ �I !M innesota I 155317 Location where permit will be used. If an outdoor area, describe. 4'�411 9;v��Jtt�s�c!Z�11� ,,� � �+l{ If the app l icant will contract for intoxicating liquor service give the name and address of the liquor license providing the service. n/a If the applicant will carry liquor liability insurance please provide the carrier's name and amount of coverage. Lexington Insurance Company, Policy Number: 01537 5594, Coverage: $4,000,000 General Aggregate. APPROVAL APPLICATION MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMITTING TO ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT City or County approving the license Date Approved Fee Amount Permit Date Date Fee Paid City or County E-mail Address City or County Phone Number Signature City Clerk or County Official Approved Director Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement CLERKS NOTICE: Submit this form to Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 30 days prior to event. ONE SUBMISSION PER EMAIL, APPLICATION ONLY. PLEASE PROVIDE A VALID E-MAIL ADDRESS FOR THE CITY /COUNTY AS ALL TEMPORARY PERMIT APPROVALS WILL BE SENT BACK VIA EMAIL. E-MAIL THE APPLICATION SIGNED BY CITY/COUNTY TO AGE.TEMPORARYAPPLICATION@STATE.MN.US Chanhassen $1.00 April 3, 2018 May 14, 2018 July 3 & 4, 2018 kmeuwissen@ci.chanhassen.mn.us 952-227-1107 Ir. r 1 13/0sta D M WI 1, .,„---- -. ..... IL-----.. d,. . or I I eil7'W Irg-07-144. .. .-,.- piliiiii lirr \tob-,, ! Utz + AS is "' . 4,.. , adalill4140 is 1 i', 1 OMri • i 0 { },'? s 1 t 4 11 WestllageRd City R q r Center r, --.- j '.. 1.! Park 1 e.R i in r A. OlIllitchoo! tI r. District 112 r .,-. , z, _ il dm'r ; t 7.7. . ;:. it 164......simeari1I - i »k rr irYrr _ f`1 Y ihilati !.l -as .t r; 1lit" Ir 11 ., 11' 1 .1 M!r» li--"- tai• • • tjT CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, May 14, 2018 Subject Approve a Massage Therapy Business License for Spalon Montage Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.3. Prepared By Chelsea Petersen, Assistant City Manager File No: ADM 27907 PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves a Massage Therapy Business License for Spalon Montage.” Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY On November 25, 2013 the City Council approved Ordinance No. 584, amending Chapter 10 of the Chanhassen City Code concerning Massage Therapy Business Licensing. The approval of this ordinance required all businesses offering massage therapy, with the exception of chiropractor offices and home occupations, to obtain a license from the City of Chanhassen. The license application includes a $50 license fee and $250 background check fee. The background check is conducted by the Carver County Sheriff’s Office and examines the following: Subject(s): Owner(s) and General Manager(s). Owner must disclose all businesses owned currently and in the past 7 years. Owner must provide 3 character witnesses within the State of Minnesota. Once licensed, business owners are responsible for the following: Maintaining the full name, date of birth, and address of each employee. Truthfully represent their business operations. A license is subject to revocation or suspension. A license holder may be summoned for an administrative hearing for the following reasons: Content of advertising that calls into question the nature of the business. Suspension or revocation of a license in another city. Jillian Gemlo submitted a complete application for Spalon Montage in order to receive a Massage Therapy Business License April 14, 2018. A full background check was conducted by Lauren Tholen, Background Investigator for the Carver County Sheriff’s Office. The background check produced no unfavorable information on Ms. Gemlo. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, May 14, 2018SubjectApprove a Massage Therapy Business License for Spalon MontageSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.3.Prepared By Chelsea Petersen, Assistant CityManager File No: ADM 27907PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council approves a Massage Therapy Business License for Spalon Montage.”Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYOn November 25, 2013 the City Council approved Ordinance No. 584, amending Chapter 10 of the ChanhassenCity Code concerning Massage Therapy Business Licensing. The approval of this ordinance required all businessesoffering massage therapy, with the exception of chiropractor offices and home occupations, to obtain a license fromthe City of Chanhassen.The license application includes a $50 license fee and $250 background check fee. The background check isconducted by the Carver County Sheriff’s Office and examines the following:Subject(s): Owner(s) and General Manager(s).Owner must disclose all businesses owned currently and in the past 7 years.Owner must provide 3 character witnesses within the State of Minnesota.Once licensed, business owners are responsible for the following:Maintaining the full name, date of birth, and address of each employee.Truthfully represent their business operations.A license is subject to revocation or suspension. A license holder may be summoned for an administrative hearing forthe following reasons:Content of advertising that calls into question the nature of the business.Suspension or revocation of a license in another city.Jillian Gemlo submitted a complete application for Spalon Montage in order to receive a Massage Therapy Business License April 14, 2018. A full background check was conducted by Lauren Tholen, Background Investigator for the Carver County Sheriff’s Office. The background check produced no unfavorable information on Ms. Gemlo. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of a Massage Therapy Business License to Spalon Montage. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, May 14, 2018 Subject Approve Resolution No. 201834 Approving Limited Use Permit Amendment for Panera Bread Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.4. Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Planning Case File No. 201802 PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves Amendment #1 to the Limited Use Permit #10020032 with the State of Minnesota Department of Transportation for sidewalk connections to the pedestrian trail in the rightofway for the Panera Bread site at 531 West 79th Street.” Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND The Minnesota Department of Transportation is requesting an amendment to a limited use permit to construct a sidewalk in the state's rightofway for the Panera Bread development. The sidewalk connection shown on the exhibit was identified as part of the pedestrian improvements recommended in the traffic impact study prepared for the project. The trail system to the south of the parcel was identified as the most efficient and safe route for pedestrians to access the site. The existing Limited Use Permit is valid for 10 years from the date of the original agreement which was December 24, 2015. The Permit will need to be renewed for the subsequent 10year period. DISCUSSION The original permit grants the city the right to construct, operate, and maintain a pedestrian trail within the rightofway of TH 5 from CSAH 17 to the Carver/Hennepin County line. This Amendment facilitates the identified connections to this pedestrian trail. RECOMMENDATION The City Council approves Amendment #1 to the existing Limited Use Permit to allow for connections from the Panera Bread building to the existing pedestrian trail to the south which is within MnDOT's rightofway. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, May 14, 2018SubjectApprove Resolution No. 201834 Approving Limited Use Permit Amendment for Panera BreadSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.4.Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Planning Case File No. 201802PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council approves Amendment #1 to the Limited Use Permit #10020032 with the State of MinnesotaDepartment of Transportation for sidewalk connections to the pedestrian trail in the rightofway for the PaneraBread site at 531 West 79th Street.”Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDThe Minnesota Department of Transportation is requesting an amendment to a limited use permit to construct asidewalk in the state's rightofway for the Panera Bread development. The sidewalk connection shown on the exhibitwas identified as part of the pedestrian improvements recommended in the traffic impact study prepared for theproject. The trail system to the south of the parcel was identified as the most efficient and safe route for pedestrians toaccess the site.The existing Limited Use Permit is valid for 10 years from the date of the original agreement which was December 24,2015. The Permit will need to be renewed for the subsequent 10year period.DISCUSSIONThe original permit grants the city the right to construct, operate, and maintain a pedestrian trail within the rightofwayof TH 5 from CSAH 17 to the Carver/Hennepin County line. This Amendment facilitates the identified connections tothis pedestrian trail.RECOMMENDATION The City Council approves Amendment #1 to the existing Limited Use Permit to allow for connections from the Panera Bread building to the existing pedestrian trail to the south which is within MnDOT's rightofway. ATTACHMENTS: LUP Amendment #1 LUP Amendment Exhibit LUP 2015 Agreement LUP 2015 Resolution Panera LUP Amendment Resolution LUP – Amendment LUP Form Page 1 of 3 LU1013 5/8/2018 STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AMENDMENT OF LIMITED USE PERMIT # 1 C.S. 2701 (T.H. 5) C.S. 1002 (T.H. 5) Counties of Carver, Hennepin LUP # 1002-0032 Permittee: City of Chanhassen Terminates: 12/24/2025 The State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation (“MnDOT”) and the City of Chanhassen (“Permittee”), entered into Limited Use Permit No.1002-0032 (“LUP”) involving the construction, maintenance and operation of a Facility as further described in the LUP. The parties desire to exand the existing trail with additional pages to the Exhibit A and update the existing provisions of the LUP, and the parties deem certain amendments terms and conditions mutually beneficial for effective continuation of said LUP. NOW THEREFORE MnDOT and Permittee agree as follows: 1. In this Amendment of Limited Use Permit: (a) “Area” means the area within the Right of Way as otherwise defined the LUP. (b) “Additional Area” means the area outlined in yellow on the attached Exhibit A amendment 1 (9 of 10) and (10 of 10). (c) “Facility” is hereby amended to include the nonmotorized trail constructed on the Additional Area and the original nonmotorized trail constructed on the Area. (d) “Term” for the Additional Area means that period of time commencing on March 23, 2018 and terminating on the same date that the LUP terminates, December 24, 2025. (e) All other words and phrases, unless otherwise defined herein, have the meanings attributed to them in the LUP. MnDOT hereby permits the Additional Area to Permittee, and Permittee accepts the permit of the Additional Area to have and to hold during the Term, on the same terms and conditions as are contained in the LUP, except as herein otherwise provided, and excepting the following: 1. Effective on March 23, 2018, MnDOT agrees to permit Permittee to construct, maintain and operate the Additional Area for an expansion of the nonmotorized trail in accordance with Section 2 of the LUP. LUP – Amendment LUP Form Page 2 of 3 LU1013 5/8/2018 2. Effective on March 23, 2018 Exhibit A amendment 1 (9 of 10) and (10 of 10) are added to the Exhibit A set forth in the LUP. 3. Effective on March 23, 2018, the following is added as the last paragraph in Section 1 of the LUP: Permittee hereby voluntarily releases and waives any and all claims and causes of action for damages, costs, expenses, losses, fees and compensation arising from or related to any cancellation or termination of this LUP by MnDOT. Permittee agrees that it will not make or assert any claims for damages, costs, expenses, losses, fees and compensation based upon the existence, cancellation or termination of the LUP. Permittee agrees not to sue or institute any legal action against MnDOT based upon any of the claims released in this paragraph. 4. Effective on March 23, 2018, the following paragraph is added to Section 6 of the LUP: Permittee at its sole cost and expense, agrees to comply with, and provide and maintain the Area, Facilities in compliance with all applicable laws, rules, ordinances and regulations issued by any federal, state or local political subdivision having jurisdiction and authority in connection with said Area including the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). If the Area and Facilities are not in compliance with the ADA or other applicable laws MnDOT may enter the Area and perform such obligation without liability to Permittee for any loss or damage to Permittee thereby incurred, and Permittee shall reimburse MnDOT for the cost thereof, plus 10% of such cost for overhead and supervision within 30 days of receipt of MnDOT’s invoice. 5. Effective on March 23, 2018, Section 6 of the LUP is deleted and the following Section 6 is substituted therefore: 6. CIVIL RIGHTS. The Permittee for itself, successors in interest, and assigns, as a part of the consideration hereof, does hereby covenant and agree that in the event improvements are constructed, maintained, or otherwise operated on the Property described in this Limited Use Permit for a purpose for which a MnDOT activity, facility, or program is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits, the Permittee will maintain and operate such improvements and services in compliance with all requirements imposed by the Acts and Regulations relative to nondiscrimination in federally-assisted programs of the United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, (as may be amended) such that no person on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability, income-level, or limited English proficiency will be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination in the use of said improvements. 6. Except as specifically provided herein, the terms and conditions of the LUP are confirmed and continued in full force and effect. By this Amendment of Limited Use Permit #1 the additional Exhibit A pages 9 and 10, and the terms and conditions herein are incorporated into the LUP. LUP – Amendment LUP Form Page 3 of 3 LU1013 5/8/2018 PERMITTEE Signature ____________________________ Print Name___________________________ Title ____________________________ Date ______________________________ Signature ____________________________ Print Name___________________________ Title ____________________________ Date ______________________________ MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL CITY OF CHANHASSEN By_________________________________ Its Mayor And________________________________ Its City Manager By: _______________________________ District Engineer Date ______________________________ APPROVED BY: COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION By: _______________________________ Director, Office of Land Management Date _____________________________ CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: May 14, 2018 RESOLUTION NO: 2018-34 MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE LIMITED USE PERMIT #1002-0032 WITH THE STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR A PANERA BREAD PEDESTRIAN TRAIL CONNECTION IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF TH 5 PLANNING CASE FILE NO. 2018-02 WHEREAS, the City of Chanhassen is a political subdivision, organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the Chanhassen City Council has approved a plan to construct a pedestrian trail in the right-of way of TH 5 to promote the orderly and safe crossing of the highway; and WHEREAS, the Chanhassen City Council approved a resolution approving a Limited Use Permit (#1002-0032) on December 14, 2015 for the construction and utilization of said pedestrian trail; and WHEREAS, Panera Bread would like to make a sidewalk/trail connection to said pedestrian trail in the right-of-way of TH 5. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen: 1. The City Council hereby approves Amendment #1 to Limited Use Permit #1002-0032 with the State of Minnesota Department of Transportation for the following purposes: To make a sidewalk/trail connection to the pedestrian trail within the right-of-way of TH 5 for Panera Bread, Planning Case File No. 2018-02. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute Amendment #1 to Limited Use Permit #1002-0032 and any amendments to the Permit. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 14th day of May, 2018. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Denny Laufenburger, Mayor YES NO ABSENT CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, May 14, 2018 Subject Approval of Consent of Mortgage Holder to Reciprocal Easement and Maintenance Agreement between Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC and Chanhassen Gateway Place, LLC Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.5. Prepared By Sharmeen AlJaff, Senior Planner File No: PC 201712 PROPOSED MOTION "The City Council approves the attached Consent of Mortgage Holder to the Reciprocal Easement and Maintenance Agreement between Pulte Homes of Minneosta, LLC and Chanhassen Gateway Place, LLC." Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY The site is located southwest of the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard and Lake Susan Drive. As part of the West Park 2nd Addition townhouse development, a shared access between West Park 2nd Addition and Chanhassen Gateway was approved. This existing shared access which was built in 2006 to serve Gateway Apartments will need to be adjusted to accommodate the West Park 2nd Addition Development. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, May 14, 2018SubjectApproval of Consent of Mortgage Holder to Reciprocal Easement and Maintenance Agreementbetween Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC and Chanhassen Gateway Place, LLCSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.5.Prepared By Sharmeen AlJaff, Senior Planner File No: PC 201712PROPOSED MOTION"The City Council approves the attached Consent of Mortgage Holder to the Reciprocal Easement and MaintenanceAgreement between Pulte Homes of Minneosta, LLC and Chanhassen Gateway Place, LLC."Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYThe site is located southwest of the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard and Lake Susan Drive. As part of the WestPark 2nd Addition townhouse development, a shared access between West Park 2nd Addition and ChanhassenGateway was approved. This existing shared access which was built in 2006 to serve Gateway Apartments will need to be adjusted to accommodate the West Park 2nd Addition Development. Gateway Apartments is within a Tax Increment Financing District. The city granted a loan to the property owner, Chanhassen Gateway Place, LLC, for the Project in the amount of $300,000.00 in connection with the Inclusionary Housing Account Grant from the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. To secure the loan, the city obtained a mortgage against the property. The adjustments to the access point that will be shared between West Park 2nd Addition and Gateway Apartments requires the city’s consent as a mortgage holder. Staff is recommending approval of the attached Consent of Mortgage Holder to Reciprocal Easement and Maintenance Agreement. ATTACHMENTS: Consent of Mortgage Holder Reciprocal Easement and Maintenance Agreement 197592v2 CONSENT OF MORTGAGE HOLDER RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT (Between Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC and Chanhassen Gateway Place, LLC) CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation, (the Mortgage Holder), the owner and holder of a mortgage upon the Gateway Property, consents to Gateway’s execution of this Agreement and hereby agrees that it shall not disturb Pulte's (West Park’s, or any current or future owners of the West Park Property) possession or rights under this Agreement or terminate the easements granted hereunder so long as Gateway is not entitled to terminate this Agreement under the provisions hereof. CITY OF CHANHASSEN By: Denny Laufenburger, Mayor THE STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _______ day of __________________, 2018, by Denny Laufenburger, the Mayor of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, May 14, 2018 Subject West Water Treatment Plant Update Section NEW BUSINESS Item No: G.1. Prepared By Paul Oehme, Director of Public Works/City Engineer File No: Project No. 201503 DISCUSSION The West Water Treatment Plant has been under construction since January 2017. The project is about 90% complete and substantial completion is anticipated in June. The majority of the work that is left to complete is the site work. The plant has been designed for the ultimate treatment capacity needs of the city and will bring all the western wells and future wells to the plant for iron and manganese removal. The iron and manganese filtration removal plant has a total capacity of 6,000 gpm. The plant has a process very similar to the gravity castinplace treatment process as the East Plant to provide consistency in the plant operations and finished water quality. An underground detention basin is included in the project to improve the filtration process efficiency. The plant is designed so treated water will be able to be pumped in the low and highpressure zones. Staff will review the progress of the project with the City Council and discuss remaining items left to complete. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, May 14, 2018 Subject Review of Claims Paid 05112018 Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: J.1. Prepared By Greg Sticha, Finance Director File No: SUMMARY The following claims are submitted for review on May 14, 2018: Check Numbers Amounts 166952 – 167052 $311,943.54 ACH Payments $272,579.11 Total All Claims $584,522.65 ATTACHMENTS: Check Summary Check Summary ACH Check Detail Check Detail ACH Accounts Payable User: Printed: dwashburn 5/8/2018 4:19 PM Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount 413FIT 413 FITNESS 04/19/2018 0.00 146.50166952 ANDON ANDON INC 04/19/2018 0.00 41.63166953 ASPMIL ASPEN MILLS 04/19/2018 0.00 1,403.72166954 BCATRA BCA 04/19/2018 0.00 180.00166955 BREMANNA Anna Bremmer 04/19/2018 0.00 70.00166956 CAPAGE CAP AGENCY 04/19/2018 0.00 2,100.00166957 CENENE CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 04/19/2018 0.00 1,020.22166958 ChaHer Chaska Herald 04/19/2018 0.00 40.00166959 CHIFIL Chick-Fil-A 04/19/2018 0.00 151,078.00166960 CORMAI CORE & MAIN LP 04/19/2018 0.00 209.91166961 CUBFOO CUB FOODS 04/19/2018 0.00 37.26166962 DIVPLU Diversified Plumbing & Heating Inc 04/19/2018 0.00 4,760.00166963 FerEnt Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 04/19/2018 0.00 2,422.76166964 hach Hach Company 04/19/2018 0.00 372.71166965 ICMA ICMA 04/19/2018 0.00 1,308.07166966 LEAMIN LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 04/19/2018 0.00 155.00166967 LiviShir Shirley Livingston 04/19/2018 0.00 16.00166968 MADGAL MADDEN GALANTER HANSEN LLP 04/19/2018 0.00 60.45166969 MNUCFU Minnesota UC Fund 04/19/2018 0.00 3,284.72166970 MinuPre Minuteman Press 04/19/2018 0.00 96.00166971 MNHEAL MN DEPT OF HEALTH 04/19/2018 0.00 23.00166972 MOOMED MOORE MEDICAL 04/19/2018 0.00 161.72166973 RAITRE RAINBOW TREE COMPANY 04/19/2018 0.00 2,450.50166974 SCHELE SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP 04/19/2018 0.00 1,660.52166975 SIGNSO SIGNSOURCE 04/19/2018 0.00 577.00166976 SOUSUB Southwest Suburban Publishing 04/19/2018 0.00 729.04166977 triedeea DeeAnn Triethart 04/19/2018 0.00 38.86166978 WESTER WESTERMANN'S ART & FRAME 04/19/2018 0.00 316.32166979 AcrThe Across The Street Productions 04/26/2018 0.00 693.00166980 ALLEPRIN Allegra Print & Imaging 04/26/2018 0.00 730.00166981 ASPEQU Aspen Equipment 04/26/2018 0.00 755.00166982 BAUBUI Bauer Built Inc 04/26/2018 0.00 1,233.42166983 BCATRA BCA 04/26/2018 0.00 60.00166984 BERCOF BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 04/26/2018 0.00 681.54166985 BORSTA BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 04/26/2018 0.00 180.00166986 CARENV CARVER COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL 04/26/2018 0.00 181.00166987 CHASKA CITY OF CHASKA 04/26/2018 0.00 1,173.37166988 COMASP Commercial Asphalt Co 04/26/2018 0.00 339.21166989 CORMAI CORE & MAIN LP 04/26/2018 0.00 74.64166990 DREGERIC Eric Dregni 04/26/2018 0.00 100.00166991 EARAND Earl F Andersen Inc 04/26/2018 0.00 1,232.50166992 FACMOT FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 04/26/2018 0.00 134.28166993 FerEnt Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 04/26/2018 0.00 442.01166994 FlePri FleetPride, Inc.04/26/2018 0.00 823.98166995 HENCHE HENNEPIN COUNTY CHIEF'S ASSOC 04/26/2018 0.00 850.00166996 ICMART ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 04/26/2018 0.00 1,445.83166997 INDSCH INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST 112 04/26/2018 0.00 13,681.10166998 Page 1AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (5/8/2018 4:19 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount KENGRA KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 04/26/2018 0.00 591.30166999 METCO2 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 04/26/2018 0.00 475.00167000 MEYERILE Riley Meyer 04/26/2018 0.00 800.00167001 MNHEAL MN DEPT OF HEALTH 04/26/2018 0.00 23.00167002 NahaShel Shelly Nahan 04/26/2018 0.00 703.00167003 PeterChe Chelsea Petersen 04/26/2018 0.00 341.30167004 POST POSTMASTER 04/26/2018 0.00 1,270.04167005 RIVCOM RIVERLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE 04/26/2018 0.00 280.00167006 SIGNSO SIGNSOURCE 04/26/2018 0.00 1,055.00167007 STRINS STRATEGIC INSIGHTS COMPANY 04/26/2018 0.00 700.00167008 TWICITY Twin City Fireplace & Stone Co 04/26/2018 0.00 5.25167009 WINGRICH RICHARD WING 04/26/2018 0.00 100.00167010 ALLSTR ALLSTREAM 05/03/2018 0.00 490.84167011 ANDSUS Susan Anderson 05/03/2018 0.00 115.00167012 ASPMIL ASPEN MILLS 05/03/2018 0.00 323.00167013 UB*01369 BEN/ROBYN BARTELS 05/03/2018 0.00 231.41167014 BCATRA BCA 05/03/2018 0.00 225.00167015 UB*01381 ALBERT BEETY 05/03/2018 0.00 16.15167016 BENPRO BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC 05/03/2018 0.00 4,777.00167017 UB*01379 PATRICK & MALINDA BERGSTROM 05/03/2018 0.00 69.94167018 BORSTA BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 05/03/2018 0.00 276.22167019 UB*01374 BURNET TITLE LLC 05/03/2018 0.00 44.28167020 CDWGOV CDW GOVERNMENT LLC 05/03/2018 0.00 1,140.00167021 EmbMinn CENTURYLINK 05/03/2018 0.00 1,827.46167022 CORMAI CORE & MAIN LP 05/03/2018 0.00 279.76167023 COVIAMY Amy Covington 05/03/2018 0.00 50.00167024 UB*01384 CUSTOM HOME BUILDERS TITLE LLC 05/03/2018 0.00 56.28167025 EARAND Earl F Andersen Inc 05/03/2018 0.00 130.60167026 UB*01378 EDINA REALTY TITLE 05/03/2018 0.00 145.64167027 UB*01385 EQUITABLE HOLDING CO, LLC 05/03/2018 0.00 11.22167028 UB*01382 EXECUTIVE TITLE OF MN 05/03/2018 0.00 95.57167029 UB*01373 EXECUTIVE TITLE OF MN LLC 05/03/2018 0.00 7.63167030 FACMOT FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 05/03/2018 0.00 65.22167031 FraAnn Annette Fragale 05/03/2018 0.00 236.25167032 HARTLIFE Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company05/03/2018 0.00 1,080.62167033 UB*01376 GEORGE HOLASEK 05/03/2018 0.00 14.84167034 UB*01366 HOLASEK FARMS LP 05/03/2018 0.00 470.25167035 UB*01383 KEVIN & OLIVIA KLINGBIEL 05/03/2018 0.00 14.59167036 UB*01365 MICHAEL LALIM 05/03/2018 0.00 159.77167037 UB*01367 NICOLAS & CARYL MANOLES 05/03/2018 0.00 17.53167038 MTIDIS MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 05/03/2018 0.00 91,426.75167039 NEWSIG NEWMAN SIGNS INC 05/03/2018 0.00 700.81167040 UB*01372 BRUCE & JODI NORD 05/03/2018 0.00 18.17167041 UB*01368 LYNN O'REILY 05/03/2018 0.00 35.62167042 UB*01380 PARTNERS TITLE 05/03/2018 0.00 10.08167043 UB*01370 GEORGE PELLNOW 05/03/2018 0.00 43.01167044 UB*01377 RESULT TITLE 05/03/2018 0.00 156.90167045 Senja Senja Inc 05/03/2018 0.00 115.20167046 TARPS TARPS INC 05/03/2018 0.00 90.00167047 UB*01371 TITLE SMART INC 05/03/2018 0.00 9.76167048 UB*01375 TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES INC 05/03/2018 0.00 140.47167049 VIKELE VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 05/03/2018 0.00 37.94167050 WastMana Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 05/03/2018 0.00 471.48167051 ZONES ZONES INC 05/03/2018 0.00 400.60167052 Page 2AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (5/8/2018 4:19 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount Report Total (101 checks): 311,943.54 0.00 Page 3AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (5/8/2018 4:19 PM) Accounts Payable Checks by Date - Summary by Check User: dwashburn Printed: 5/8/2018 4:21 PM Check Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH Z-AIRSYS Air Systems International 04/16/2018 0.00 278.71 ACH Z-ALLFUS Allfuses.com 04/16/2018 0.00 17.00 ACH Z-AMAZON Amazon 04/16/2018 0.00 5,575.75 ACH Z-AMELEG American Legion 04/16/2018 0.00 50.36 ACH Z-APPBEE Applebee's 04/16/2018 0.00 136.33 ACH Z-CAPCOM Capitol Complex ePark Pay Station 04/16/2018 0.00 8.00 ACH Z-CARCOF Caribou Coffee 04/16/2018 0.00 138.45 ACH Z-CHAFLO Chanhassen Floral 04/16/2018 0.00 62.00 ACH Z-COMAIR Compressed Air 04/16/2018 0.00 141.40 ACH Z-COSTCO Costco Wholesale 04/16/2018 0.00 160.13 ACH Z-CUBFOO Cub Foods 04/16/2018 0.00 180.60 ACH Z-DAVANN Davanni's 04/16/2018 0.00 110.22 ACH Z-DOMINO Domino's Pizza 04/16/2018 0.00 105.90 ACH Z-EVEBRI Eventbrite 04/16/2018 0.00 1,109.68 ACH Z-FACBOO Facebook 04/16/2018 0.00 4.29 ACH Z-FEDEX FedEx Office 04/16/2018 0.00 6.40 ACH Z-FUNEXP Fun Express LLC 04/16/2018 0.00 376.58 ACH Z-GENREP General Repair Service 04/16/2018 0.00 277.41 ACH Z-GRAVIE Grand View Lodge 04/16/2018 0.00 453.74 ACH Z-GRAELE Graybar Electric Co 04/16/2018 0.00 61.09 ACH Z-GTSEDU GTS Education Events 04/16/2018 0.00 1,040.00 ACH Z-HALCOM Hallock Company 04/16/2018 0.00 326.30 ACH Z-HOMDEP Home Depot 04/16/2018 0.00 85.86 ACH Z-HOULIH Houlihan's 04/16/2018 0.00 113.58 ACH Z-JERMIK Jersey Mike's Subs 04/16/2018 0.00 99.21 ACH Z-JETCOM Jet.com 04/16/2018 0.00 111.30 ACH Z-KWITRI Kwik Trip 04/16/2018 0.00 3.33 ACH Z-LUNBYE Lunds & Byerly's 04/16/2018 0.00 85.87 ACH Z-MCMCAR McMaster-Carr 04/16/2018 0.00 69.29 ACH Z-MENARD Menards 04/16/2018 0.00 16.06 ACH Z-MILFLE Mills Fleet Farm 04/16/2018 0.00 15.28 ACH Z-MNLAND Minnesota Landmarks 04/16/2018 0.00 288.00 ACH Z-MNAWWA MN American Water Works Association 04/16/2018 0.00 60.00 ACH Z-MNLABO MN Dept of Labor and Industry 04/16/2018 0.00 65.00 ACH Z-MNPOLL MN Pollution Control Agency 04/16/2018 0.00 23.00 ACH Z-NATCAM National Camera Exchange 04/16/2018 0.00 1,718.95 ACH Z-OFFMAX Office Max/Office Depot 04/16/2018 0.00 300.05 ACH Z-ORBITZ Orbitz.com 04/16/2018 0.00 597.80 ACH Z-PAIGEA Painters Gear Inc 04/16/2018 0.00 740.15 ACH Z-PARCIT Party City 04/16/2018 0.00 8.55 ACH Z-PAYPAL PayPal 04/16/2018 0.00 90.00 ACH Z-REVDAN Revolution Dancewear 04/16/2018 0.00 1,916.66 ACH Z-ROTCLU Rotary Club 04/16/2018 0.00 212.00 ACH Z-STPAUL Saint Paul Hotel 04/16/2018 0.00 1,196.04 Page 1 of 3 Check Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH Z-SAMCLU Sam's Club 04/16/2018 0.00 -7.51 ACH Z-SENLAN Sensible Land Use Coalition 04/16/2018 0.00 44.00 ACH Z-SIBSYS Siber Systems Inc 04/16/2018 0.00 19.95 ACH Z-TARGET Target 04/16/2018 0.00 34.29 ACH Z-UOFM U of M Contlearning 04/16/2018 0.00 225.00 ACH Z-WALGRE Walgreens 04/16/2018 0.00 10.00 ACH Z-WALMAR Wal-Mart 04/16/2018 0.00 18.76 ACH Z-WEISSM WEISSMAN 04/16/2018 0.00 420.53 ACH Z-WWGRAI WW Grainger 04/16/2018 0.00 22.55 ACH CAMKNU CAMPBELL KNUTSON 04/19/2018 0.00 12,555.87 ACH carcou Carver County 04/19/2018 0.00 20,387.59 ACH CHOELE CHOICE ELECTRIC 04/19/2018 0.00 47.89 ACH DelDen Delta Dental 04/19/2018 0.00 2,577.10 ACH FASCOM FASTENAL COMPANY 04/19/2018 0.00 7.11 ACH FergEnte Ferguson Waterworks #2516 04/19/2018 0.00 819.79 ACH HAWCHE HAWKINS CHEMICAL 04/19/2018 0.00 210.00 ACH InnOff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 04/19/2018 0.00 67.33 ACH AlHiJuli Juli Al-Hilwani 04/19/2018 0.00 225.00 ACH BENSKAYE KAYE L BENSON 04/19/2018 0.00 560.00 ACH KORTER KORTERRA INC 04/19/2018 0.00 1,000.00 ACH LYMLUM LYMAN LUMBER 04/19/2018 0.00 199.45 ACH Marco Marco Inc 04/19/2018 0.00 925.65 ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 04/19/2018 0.00 193.38 ACH MUSTOG MUSIC TOGETHER LAKESIDE 04/19/2018 0.00 1,078.00 ACH PreWat Premium Waters, Inc 04/19/2018 0.00 10.30 ACH DaniReem Reem Danial 04/19/2018 0.00 229.60 ACH ULTCON ULTIMATE CONTROLS ELECTRIC LLC 04/19/2018 0.00 1,672.50 ACH USABLU USA BLUE BOOK 04/19/2018 0.00 782.97 ACH WWGRA WW GRAINGER INC 04/19/2018 0.00 38.58 ACH Avesis Avesis Third Party Administrators, Inc. 04/26/2018 0.00 168.03 ACH carcou Carver County 04/26/2018 0.00 13,868.92 ACH Choice Choice, Inc. 04/26/2018 0.00 199.46 ACH CusHom Custom Hose Tech, Inc. 04/26/2018 0.00 221.25 ACH FASCOM FASTENAL COMPANY 04/26/2018 0.00 130.67 ACH FORAME FORCE AMERICA INC 04/26/2018 0.00 78.55 ACH STICGREG GREG STICHA 04/26/2018 0.00 18.70 ACH InnOff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 04/26/2018 0.00 137.17 ACH KATFUE KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 04/26/2018 0.00 5,193.80 ACH MilAut Milestone Auto Inc. 04/26/2018 0.00 231.00 ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 04/26/2018 0.00 106.95 ACH NAPA NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 04/26/2018 0.00 85.86 ACH NusEqu Nuss Truck & Equipment 04/26/2018 0.00 978.18 ACH RBMSER RBM SERVICES INC 04/26/2018 0.00 5,157.62 ACH SPRPCS SPRINT PCS 04/26/2018 0.00 103.44 ACH SPSCOM SPS COMPANIES INC 04/26/2018 0.00 43.42 ACH STRGUA STRATOGUARD LLC 04/26/2018 0.00 160.00 ACH MINCON SUMMIT COMPANIES 04/26/2018 0.00 275.00 ACH SunLif Sun Life Financial 04/26/2018 0.00 1,403.36 ACH UNIWAY UNITED WAY 04/26/2018 0.00 28.40 ACH WatCon Water Conservation Services, Inc. 04/26/2018 0.00 366.93 ACH WAYTEK WAYTEK INC 04/26/2018 0.00 99.06 ACH WitPub Witmer Public Safety Group, Inc. 04/26/2018 0.00 60.49 ACH xcel XCEL ENERGY INC 04/26/2018 0.00 8,076.86 Page 2 of 3 Check Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH ZARBRU ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC 04/26/2018 0.00 3,458.20 ACH A1ELE A-1 ELECTRIC SERVICE 05/03/2018 0.00 1,632.32 ACH AE2SCON AE2S CONSTRUCTION LLC 05/03/2018 0.00 5,234.27 ACH ALEAIR ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC 05/03/2018 0.00 130.00 ACH AFLAC American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 05/03/2018 0.00 39.78 ACH carcou Carver County 05/03/2018 0.00 5,704.00 ACH CCPNIM CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 05/03/2018 0.00 6,455.63 ACH PedrChri Christine Lea Pedretti 05/03/2018 0.00 884.00 ACH ColLif Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 05/03/2018 0.00 257.58 ACH GOPSTA GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 05/03/2018 0.00 216.30 ACH HALHOM HALDEMAN - HOMME, INC 05/03/2018 0.00 418.92 ACH HeaStr Health Strategies 05/03/2018 0.00 450.00 ACH IndPla Indelco Plastics Corporation 05/03/2018 0.00 350.95 ACH AlHiJuli Juli Al-Hilwani 05/03/2018 0.00 431.25 ACH KIMHOR KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 05/03/2018 0.00 45,848.31 ACH LOCSUP LOCATORS AND SUPPLIES INC 05/03/2018 0.00 160.26 ACH MACEQU MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 05/03/2018 0.00 12,409.00 ACH MRPA MN RECREATION & PARK ASSOC. 05/03/2018 0.00 100.00 ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 05/03/2018 0.00 177.91 ACH OREAUT O'Reilly Automotive Inc 05/03/2018 0.00 91.93 ACH PotMN Potentia MN Solar 05/03/2018 0.00 8,381.83 ACH PRARES PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 05/03/2018 0.00 750.00 ACH TBEI TBEI, Inc 05/03/2018 0.00 488.00 ACH TouPoi TouchPoint Logic LLC 05/03/2018 0.00 1,245.00 ACH ULTCON ULTIMATE CONTROLS ELECTRIC LLC 05/03/2018 0.00 3,495.00 ACH UniFar United Farmers Cooperative 05/03/2018 0.00 8,356.89 ACH VERIZO VERIZON WIRELESS 05/03/2018 0.00 4,185.63 ACH WENCK WENCK ASSOCIATES INC 05/03/2018 0.00 2,574.50 ACH WSB WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 05/03/2018 0.00 34,375.56 ACH XCEL XCEL ENERGY INC 05/03/2018 0.00 24,270.97 Report Total: 0.00 272,579.11 Page 3 of 3 Accounts Payable Check Detail-Checks User: dwashburn Printed: 05/08/2018 - 4:22 PM Name Check D Account Description Amount 413 FITNESS 04/19/2018 101-1533-4300 Personal Training 146.50 413 FITNESS 146.50 Across The Street Productions 04/26/2018 101-1220-4370 Blue Card 50 hour On-line Training Program - Pribble, LeFevere 693.00 Across The Street Productions 693.00 Allegra Print & Imaging 04/26/2018 101-1170-4110 Postcard Perfed 2-up Templates 2500 sheets 730.00 Allegra Print & Imaging 730.00 ALLSTREAM 05/03/2018 101-1160-4300 phone system maintenance 6/18/18-7/17/18 490.84 ALLSTREAM 490.84 Anderson Susan 05/03/2018 101-1541-3634 Refund - Graduation Open House Lake Ann Park 115.00 Anderson Susan 115.00 ANDON INC 04/19/2018 101-1220-4375 Helium Cylinder Rental 41.63 ANDON INC 41.63 Aspen Equipment 04/26/2018 101-1550-4120 Multi-Positio R, Solenoid Control 755.00 Aspen Equipment 755.00 ASPEN MILLS 04/19/2018 101-1220-4240 Badge Custom 346.67 ASPEN MILLS 04/19/2018 101-1220-4240 Leather Belts 24.00 ASPEN MILLS 04/19/2018 101-1220-4240 AM Jacket Soft Shell Navy 112.85 ASPEN MILLS 04/19/2018 101-1220-4240 AM Jacket Soft Shell Navy 112.85 ASPEN MILLS 04/19/2018 101-1220-4240 AM Jacket Soft Shell Navy 112.85 ASPEN MILLS 04/19/2018 101-1220-4240 Pants, Shirts and name tags 153.20 ASPEN MILLS 04/19/2018 101-1220-4240 Pants, Shirts and name tags 153.20 ASPEN MILLS 04/19/2018 101-1220-4240 AM Jacket Soft Shell Navy 112.85 ASPEN MILLS 04/19/2018 101-1220-4240 Name Tags 53.10 ASPEN MILLS 04/19/2018 101-1220-4240 Pants, Shirts and Name Tags 222.15 ASPEN MILLS 05/03/2018 101-1220-4240 Pants, Shirts and Jackets 323.00 ASPEN MILLS 1,726.72 BARTELS BEN/ROBYN 05/03/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 119.63 BARTELS BEN/ROBYN 05/03/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 89.29 BARTELS BEN/ROBYN 05/03/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 19.01 BARTELS BEN/ROBYN 05/03/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.48 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (05/08/2018 - 4:22 PM)Page 1 of 10 Name Check D Account Description Amount BARTELS BEN/ROBYN 231.41 Bauer Built Inc 04/26/2018 101-1550-4120 Multi-Trac C/S 1,233.42 Bauer Built Inc 1,233.42 BCA 04/19/2018 101-1120-4300 Background Investigation 180.00 BCA 05/03/2018 101-1120-4300 Background Investigation 225.00 BCA 04/26/2018 101-1120-4300 Background Investigation 60.00 BCA 465.00 BEETY ALBERT 05/03/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 5.89 BEETY ALBERT 05/03/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 8.89 BEETY ALBERT 05/03/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.45 BEETY ALBERT 05/03/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.92 BEETY ALBERT 16.15 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC 05/03/2018 101-1550-4300 Snowplowing Commercial 4,777.00 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC 4,777.00 BERGSTROM PATRICK & MALINDA 05/03/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 19.46 BERGSTROM PATRICK & MALINDA 05/03/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 35.05 BERGSTROM PATRICK & MALINDA 05/03/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 13.12 BERGSTROM PATRICK & MALINDA 05/03/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.31 BERGSTROM PATRICK & MALINDA 69.94 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 04/26/2018 101-1170-4110 Coffee 62.79 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 04/26/2018 101-1170-4110 Coffee 618.75 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 681.54 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 05/03/2018 701-0000-4530 Temp Control Switch -226.41 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 05/03/2018 701-0000-4530 Heater 502.63 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 04/26/2018 101-1190-4510 GELA - LED12G24Q/H/835 Lamps 180.00 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 456.22 Bremmer Anna 04/19/2018 101-1531-3631 Refund due to Saturday blizzard closure 70.00 Bremmer Anna 70.00 BURNET TITLE LLC 05/03/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 15.01 BURNET TITLE LLC 05/03/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 25.76 BURNET TITLE LLC 05/03/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.98 BURNET TITLE LLC 05/03/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.53 BURNET TITLE LLC 44.28 CAP AGENCY 04/19/2018 101-1430-4300 1st quarter services - Jan, Feb, Mar 2018 2,100.00 CAP AGENCY 2,100.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (05/08/2018 - 4:22 PM)Page 2 of 10 Name Check D Account Description Amount CARVER COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL 04/26/2018 101-1320-4140 Tires - Semi, Farm(small) and Car/Truck/SUV 60.33 CARVER COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL 04/26/2018 101-1550-4140 Tires - Semi, Farm(small) and Car/Truck/SUV 60.33 CARVER COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL 04/26/2018 700-0000-4120 Tires - Semi, Farm(small) and Car/Truck/SUV 60.34 CARVER COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL 181.00 CDW GOVERNMENT LLC 05/03/2018 400-4126-4703 APC Smart-UPS SMT3000RM2UC 1,140.00 CDW GOVERNMENT LLC 1,140.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 04/19/2018 101-1220-4320 monthly charges 2/24/18-3/27/18 701.14 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 04/19/2018 101-1530-4320 monthly charges 2/24/18-3/27/18 255.98 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 04/19/2018 101-1120-4320 monthly charges 2/24/18-3/27/18 63.10 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 1,020.22 CENTURYLINK 05/03/2018 101-1170-4310 phone charges April 2018 832.61 CENTURYLINK 05/03/2018 700-0000-4310 phone charges April 2018 6.36 CENTURYLINK 05/03/2018 701-0000-4310 phone charges April 2018 6.36 CENTURYLINK 05/03/2018 101-1550-4310 phone charges April 2018 30.04 CENTURYLINK 05/03/2018 101-1350-4310 phone charges April 2018 30.04 CENTURYLINK 05/03/2018 101-1220-4310 phone charges April 2018 33.04 CENTURYLINK 05/03/2018 101-1370-4310 phone charges April 2018 50.88 CENTURYLINK 05/03/2018 101-1160-4320 phone charges April 2018 125.00 CENTURYLINK 05/03/2018 101-1190-4310 phone charges April 2018 127.20 CENTURYLINK 05/03/2018 700-0000-4310 phone charges April 2018 15.13 CENTURYLINK 05/03/2018 700-7019-4310 phone charges April 2018 210.27 CENTURYLINK 05/03/2018 701-0000-4310 phone charges April 2018 15.13 CENTURYLINK 05/03/2018 101-1160-4320 phone charges April 2018 250.00 CENTURYLINK 05/03/2018 101-1540-4310 phone charges 95.40 CENTURYLINK 1,827.46 Chaska Herald 04/19/2018 101-1250-4210 Subscription renewal 40.00 Chaska Herald 40.00 Chick-Fil-A 04/19/2018 815-8221-2024 Security Escrow 151,078.00 Chick-Fil-A 151,078.00 CITY OF CHASKA 04/26/2018 101-1560-4300 Dance Til You Drop Trip 1,118.48 CITY OF CHASKA 04/26/2018 101-1560-4370 Dance Til You Drop Trip 54.89 CITY OF CHASKA 1,173.37 Commercial Asphalt Co 04/26/2018 420-0000-4751 Dura Drive, 9.5MM Rec Wear 339.21 Commercial Asphalt Co 339.21 CORE & MAIN LP 04/19/2018 700-0000-4550 4 BLIND FLG DI PR IMP, 4x1/8 FLG FF RR GASKET 127.16 CORE & MAIN LP 04/19/2018 701-0000-4553 4 SCH40 PVC PIPE SWB 10' 22.70 CORE & MAIN LP 04/19/2018 701-0000-4551 4 PVC SDR35 SWR 45 HXSP,GXSP, PRIMER/CLNR 60.05 CORE & MAIN LP 05/03/2018 700-0000-4550 1 Pound Wat Hydrant Grease 279.76 CORE & MAIN LP 04/26/2018 700-0000-4550 747011 1x3/4 Bush AWWA and 74701B 3/4 Ball Corp Stop NL 74.64 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (05/08/2018 - 4:22 PM)Page 3 of 10 Name Check D Account Description Amount CORE & MAIN LP 564.31 Covington Amy 05/03/2018 720-7202-3640 Garden plot refund 50.00 Covington Amy 50.00 CUB FOODS 04/19/2018 101-1220-4350 409 Cleaner, Pine Sol, Window Cleaner 19.69 CUB FOODS 04/19/2018 101-1220-4350 Toilet Cleaner, Disinfectent Wipes 17.57 CUB FOODS 37.26 CUSTOM HOME BUILDERS TITLE LLC 05/03/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 18.33 CUSTOM HOME BUILDERS TITLE LLC 05/03/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 31.04 CUSTOM HOME BUILDERS TITLE LLC 05/03/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 5.87 CUSTOM HOME BUILDERS TITLE LLC 05/03/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.04 CUSTOM HOME BUILDERS TITLE LLC 56.28 Diversified Plumbing & Heating Inc 04/19/2018 101-1370-4510 Re-Routed existing hot water recirculation line shop bathroom 3,808.00 Diversified Plumbing & Heating Inc 04/19/2018 700-0000-4510 Re-Routed existing hot water recirculation line shop bathroom 476.00 Diversified Plumbing & Heating Inc 04/19/2018 701-0000-4510 Re-Routed existing hot water recirculation line shop bathroom 476.00 Diversified Plumbing & Heating Inc 4,760.00 Dregni Eric 04/26/2018 101-1560-4300 5/3/18 speaker 100.00 Dregni Eric 100.00 Earl F Andersen Inc 05/03/2018 101-1320-4560 12x18 W/R/B No Parking Symbol 130.60 Earl F Andersen Inc 04/26/2018 101-1320-4560 Galvanized Channel Posts, Brack-Its Flared Leg Stainless 1,232.50 Earl F Andersen Inc 1,363.10 EDINA REALTY TITLE 05/03/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 145.64 EDINA REALTY TITLE 145.64 EQUITABLE HOLDING CO, LLC 05/03/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 11.22 EQUITABLE HOLDING CO, LLC 11.22 EXECUTIVE TITLE OF MN 05/03/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 30.86 EXECUTIVE TITLE OF MN 05/03/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 46.49 EXECUTIVE TITLE OF MN 05/03/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 15.49 EXECUTIVE TITLE OF MN 05/03/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.73 EXECUTIVE TITLE OF MN 95.57 EXECUTIVE TITLE OF MN LLC 05/03/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.23 EXECUTIVE TITLE OF MN LLC 05/03/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.67 EXECUTIVE TITLE OF MN LLC 05/03/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.32 EXECUTIVE TITLE OF MN LLC 05/03/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.41 EXECUTIVE TITLE OF MN LLC 7.63 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 05/03/2018 101-1550-4120 DEL24A 88863812 C600 R113 (7) 65.22 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (05/08/2018 - 4:22 PM)Page 4 of 10 Name Check D Account Description Amount FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 04/26/2018 101-1320-4120 N/C Brake Clean 15oz, PR-3 Wrench-Eze Spray 44.76 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 04/26/2018 101-1550-4120 N/C Brake Clean 15oz, PR-3 Wrench-Eze Spray 44.76 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 04/26/2018 701-0000-4120 N/C Brake Clean 15oz, PR-3 Wrench-Eze Spray 44.76 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 199.50 Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 04/19/2018 700-0000-4550 CK1, CK2, RT Rep Kits 1,792.83 Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 04/19/2018 700-0000-4550 RT Rep Kits 629.93 Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 04/26/2018 700-0000-4550 LFNP 3 LFRK 909-S REP KIT, LFNP 2-1/2 LFRK 909-S 442.01 Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 2,864.77 FleetPride, Inc.04/26/2018 101-1220-4140 5" ID/OD Alumnzd 90 De Elboww 98.06 FleetPride, Inc.04/26/2018 101-1220-4140 Nut & Washer Kit - RT40-145 Seri -31.43 FleetPride, Inc.04/26/2018 101-1550-4140 Bolt kit, Timken, Nut & Washer, Taper Cups and Cones 757.35 FleetPride, Inc. 823.98 Fragale Annette 05/03/2018 101-1539-4300 Line Dancing 236.25 Fragale Annette 236.25 Hach Company 04/19/2018 700-7019-4150 Free Chlorine & Low Range Orthophosphate Chemkey Reagents 372.71 Hach Company 372.71 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 05/03/2018 101-1120-4040 May 2018 insurance premium 69.45 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 05/03/2018 101-1130-4040 May 2018 insurance premium 47.83 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 05/03/2018 101-1160-4040 May 2018 insurance premium 24.74 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 05/03/2018 101-1250-4040 May 2018 insurance premium 106.45 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 05/03/2018 101-1310-4040 May 2018 insurance premium 96.43 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 05/03/2018 101-1320-4040 May 2018 insurance premium 111.73 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 05/03/2018 101-1370-4040 May 2018 insurance premium 44.79 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 05/03/2018 101-1520-4040 May 2018 insurance premium 35.08 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 05/03/2018 101-1530-4040 May 2018 insurance premium 14.05 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 05/03/2018 101-1560-4040 May 2018 insurance premium 13.87 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 05/03/2018 101-1600-4040 May 2018 insurance premium 22.34 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 05/03/2018 101-1700-4040 May 2018 insurance premium 5.59 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 05/03/2018 101-1550-4040 May 2018 insurance premium 104.16 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 05/03/2018 101-1420-4040 May 2018 insurance premium 73.63 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 05/03/2018 101-1430-4040 May 2018 insurance premium 4.67 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 05/03/2018 210-0000-4040 May 2018 insurance premium 17.84 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 05/03/2018 720-7201-4040 May 2018 insurance premium 5.51 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 05/03/2018 720-7202-4040 May 2018 insurance premium 5.51 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 05/03/2018 101-1170-4040 May 2018 insurance premium 12.37 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 05/03/2018 101-1220-4040 May 2018 insurance premium 42.30 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 05/03/2018 701-0000-4040 May 2018 insurance premium 79.49 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 05/03/2018 700-0000-4040 May 2018 insurance premium 105.31 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 05/03/2018 720-0000-4040 May 2018 insurance premium 37.48 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 1,080.62 HENNEPIN COUNTY CHIEF'S ASSOC 04/26/2018 101-1220-4370 Blue Card SIM Training - C Olsen, T Dowds 850.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY CHIEF'S ASSOC 850.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (05/08/2018 - 4:22 PM)Page 5 of 10 Name Check D Account Description Amount HOLASEK FARMS LP 05/03/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 470.25 HOLASEK FARMS LP 470.25 HOLASEK GEORGE 05/03/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 4.06 HOLASEK GEORGE 05/03/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 6.35 HOLASEK GEORGE 05/03/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.68 HOLASEK GEORGE 05/03/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.75 HOLASEK GEORGE 14.84 ICMA 04/19/2018 101-1120-4360 Renewal-Member# 192194 1,308.07 ICMA 1,308.07 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 04/26/2018 101-0000-2009 4/27/2018 ID #304303 1,114.58 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 04/26/2018 210-0000-2009 4/27/2018 ID #304303 25.00 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 04/26/2018 700-0000-2009 4/27/2018 ID #304303 152.50 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 04/26/2018 701-0000-2009 4/27/2018 ID #304303 152.49 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 04/26/2018 720-0000-2009 4/27/2018 ID #304303 1.26 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 1,445.83 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST 112 04/26/2018 101-1530-4320 electricity/gas/water and sewer - Jan-April 2018 13,681.10 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST 112 13,681.10 KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 04/26/2018 601-0000-4300 through 3/31/18 Franchise fees 591.30 KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 591.30 KLINGBIEL KEVIN & OLIVIA 05/03/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 5.08 KLINGBIEL KEVIN & OLIVIA 05/03/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 8.20 KLINGBIEL KEVIN & OLIVIA 05/03/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.56 KLINGBIEL KEVIN & OLIVIA 05/03/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.75 KLINGBIEL KEVIN & OLIVIA 14.59 LALIM MICHAEL 05/03/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 54.61 LALIM MICHAEL 05/03/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 98.32 LALIM MICHAEL 05/03/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 4.86 LALIM MICHAEL 05/03/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.98 LALIM MICHAEL 159.77 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 04/19/2018 101-1160-4220 Moving licenses from City Adobe VIP to League Adove VIP 155.00 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 155.00 Livingston Shirley 04/19/2018 101-1560-3637 Refund for Ole & Lena on 4/27/18 16.00 Livingston Shirley 16.00 MADDEN GALANTER HANSEN LLP 04/19/2018 101-1140-4302 Labor Relations Services - March 2018 60.45 MADDEN GALANTER HANSEN LLP 60.45 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (05/08/2018 - 4:22 PM)Page 6 of 10 Name Check D Account Description Amount MANOLES NICOLAS & CARYL 05/03/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 6.51 MANOLES NICOLAS & CARYL 05/03/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 10.67 MANOLES NICOLAS & CARYL 05/03/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.30 MANOLES NICOLAS & CARYL 05/03/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.05 MANOLES NICOLAS & CARYL 17.53 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 04/26/2018 701-0000-4509 Permit Fee 475.00 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 475.00 Meyer Riley 04/26/2018 101-1766-3636 Return Adult Summer Softball League Fee-League cancelled 800.00 Meyer Riley 800.00 Minnesota UC Fund 04/19/2018 101-1320-4060 1st quarter unemployment 2,346.13 Minnesota UC Fund 04/19/2018 101-1220-4060 1st quarter unemployment 36.19 Minnesota UC Fund 04/19/2018 700-0000-4060 1st quarter unemployment 189.31 Minnesota UC Fund 04/19/2018 701-0000-4060 1st quarter unemployment 189.31 Minnesota UC Fund 04/19/2018 101-1260-4060 1st quarter unemployment 523.78 Minnesota UC Fund 3,284.72 Minuteman Press 04/19/2018 101-1170-4110 1,500 Business Cards 96.00 Minuteman Press 96.00 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 04/19/2018 700-0000-4370 Certification Fee - Jerry Johnson 23.00 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 04/26/2018 700-0000-4370 Certification fee - Bill Kistner 23.00 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 46.00 MOORE MEDICAL 04/19/2018 101-1220-4130 Gloves 161.72 MOORE MEDICAL 161.72 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 05/03/2018 400-0000-4705 Groundsmaster 5900 91,426.75 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 91,426.75 Nahan Shelly 04/26/2018 101-1538-4300 Babysitting Training 328.00 Nahan Shelly 04/26/2018 101-1538-4300 Safe Kids 101 Training 375.00 Nahan Shelly 703.00 NEWMAN SIGNS INC 05/03/2018 101-1320-4560 Signs 700.81 NEWMAN SIGNS INC 700.81 NORD BRUCE & JODI 05/03/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 4.50 NORD BRUCE & JODI 05/03/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 10.17 NORD BRUCE & JODI 05/03/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.97 NORD BRUCE & JODI 05/03/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.53 NORD BRUCE & JODI 18.17 O'REILY LYNN 05/03/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 7.31 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (05/08/2018 - 4:22 PM)Page 7 of 10 Name Check D Account Description Amount O'REILY LYNN 05/03/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 18.13 O'REILY LYNN 05/03/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 8.65 O'REILY LYNN 05/03/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.53 O'REILY LYNN 35.62 PARTNERS TITLE 05/03/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.13 PARTNERS TITLE 05/03/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 5.35 PARTNERS TITLE 05/03/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.36 PARTNERS TITLE 05/03/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.24 PARTNERS TITLE 10.08 PELLNOW GEORGE 05/03/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 13.68 PELLNOW GEORGE 05/03/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 18.84 PELLNOW GEORGE 05/03/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 8.92 PELLNOW GEORGE 05/03/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.57 PELLNOW GEORGE 43.01 Petersen Chelsea 04/26/2018 101-1120-4380 Mileage 336.30 Petersen Chelsea 04/26/2018 101-1110-4370 Spinach salads for council meeting 5.00 Petersen Chelsea 341.30 POSTMASTER 04/26/2018 700-0000-4330 Utility Statement Postage - 631 pc 144.50 POSTMASTER 04/26/2018 700-0000-4330 Utility Statement Postage - 2142 pc 490.52 POSTMASTER 04/26/2018 701-0000-4330 Utility Statement Postage - 2142 pc 490.52 POSTMASTER 04/26/2018 701-0000-4330 Utility Statement Postage - 631 pc 144.50 POSTMASTER 1,270.04 RAINBOW TREE COMPANY 04/19/2018 720-7202-4300 Fox Woods Oaks Trail Pruning 2,450.50 RAINBOW TREE COMPANY 2,450.50 RESULT TITLE 05/03/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 51.26 RESULT TITLE 05/03/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 88.68 RESULT TITLE 05/03/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 14.42 RESULT TITLE 05/03/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.54 RESULT TITLE 156.90 RIVERLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE 04/26/2018 101-1220-4370 Conference - D O'mara and R Rindahl 280.00 RIVERLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE 280.00 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP 04/19/2018 101-1170-4530 Svc call on elevator 1,660.52 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP 1,660.52 Senja Inc 05/03/2018 101-1539-4300 Tai Chi instruction 115.20 Senja Inc 115.20 SIGNSOURCE 04/19/2018 720-7202-4300 Monarch Intrepretive Sign - Lake Susan 577.00 SIGNSOURCE 04/26/2018 410-0000-4706 Cast Bronze Plaque for Chanhassen Athletic Association 1,055.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (05/08/2018 - 4:22 PM)Page 8 of 10 Name Check D Account Description Amount SIGNSOURCE 1,632.00 Southwest Suburban Publishing 04/19/2018 601-0000-4340 printing/advertising 179.84 Southwest Suburban Publishing 04/19/2018 101-1110-4340 printing/advertising 96.00 Southwest Suburban Publishing 04/19/2018 101-1120-4340 printing/advertising 190.00 Southwest Suburban Publishing 04/19/2018 101-1612-4340 printing/advertising 263.20 Southwest Suburban Publishing 729.04 STRATEGIC INSIGHTS COMPANY 04/26/2018 101-1160-4300 Plan-It! Capital Planning Software Lic Extension/Upgrade 700.00 STRATEGIC INSIGHTS COMPANY 700.00 TARPS INC 05/03/2018 101-1320-4120 Mesh Shade Clothe Repair 90.00 TARPS INC 90.00 TITLE SMART INC 05/03/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 8.31 TITLE SMART INC 05/03/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.45 TITLE SMART INC 9.76 TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES INC 05/03/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 45.90 TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES INC 05/03/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 79.39 TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES INC 05/03/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 12.90 TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES INC 05/03/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.28 TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES INC 140.47 Triethart DeeAnn 04/19/2018 101-1250-4130 Forks, Plates, Creamer 38.86 Triethart DeeAnn 38.86 Twin City Fireplace & Stone Co 04/26/2018 101-0000-2033 Over paid permit# 2018-00757 5.25 Twin City Fireplace & Stone Co 5.25 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 05/03/2018 101-1190-4510 Ballast 37.94 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 37.94 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 05/03/2018 101-1190-4350 garbage service 211.49 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 05/03/2018 101-1220-4350 garbage service 67.20 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 05/03/2018 101-1170-4350 garbage service 166.54 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 05/03/2018 101-1220-4350 garbage service 26.25 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 471.48 WESTERMANN'S ART & FRAME 04/19/2018 720-7202-4130 Arbor Day poster framing 316.32 WESTERMANN'S ART & FRAME 316.32 WING RICHARD 04/26/2018 101-1220-4350 Station 2 cleaner 100.00 WING RICHARD 100.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (05/08/2018 - 4:22 PM)Page 9 of 10 Name Check D Account Description Amount ZONES INC 05/03/2018 400-4126-4703 Network Rack, 4 Post 48U, APC AR203A 400.60 ZONES INC 400.60 311,943.54 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (05/08/2018 - 4:22 PM)Page 10 of 10 Accounts Payable Check Detail-ACH User: dwashburn Printed: 05/08/2018 - 4:22 PM Name Check D Account Description Amount A-1 ELECTRIC SERVICE 05/03/2018 400-0000-4705 Reinstall Modified Transfer Switch, battery charger, test switch 1,632.32 A-1 ELECTRIC SERVICE 1,632.32 AE2S CONSTRUCTION LLC 05/03/2018 700-0000-4300 March 2018 2018 SCADA Services Equipment 5,234.27 AE2S CONSTRUCTION LLC 5,234.27 Air Systems International 04/16/2018 700-0000-4550 Sand Blaster Air Monitor 278.71 Air Systems International 278.71 ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC 05/03/2018 101-1220-4530 Quarterly Compressor Air Quality Test 130.00 ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC 130.00 Al-Hilwani Juli 04/19/2018 101-1533-4300 Personal Training 225.00 Al-Hilwani Juli 05/03/2018 101-1533-4300 Personal Training 431.25 Al-Hilwani Juli 656.25 Allfuses.com 04/16/2018 700-0000-4530 5 - FNM-6 fuses 17.00 Allfuses.com 17.00 Amazon 04/16/2018 701-0000-4240 Work Gloves 40.95 Amazon 04/16/2018 700-0000-4240 Work Gloves 40.95 Amazon 04/16/2018 700-0000-4240 Work Gloves 40.78 Amazon 04/16/2018 701-0000-4240 Work Gloves 40.77 Amazon 04/16/2018 101-1170-4110 Space Heater - Fiance 24.99 Amazon 04/16/2018 101-1170-4110 Batteries 11.15 Amazon 04/16/2018 101-1220-4290 Allied Frame Fire Fighter Certificates 241.35 Amazon 04/16/2018 101-1530-4120 Play tunnel for kids, Little Red Wagon 44.51 Amazon 04/16/2018 101-1530-4130 Resistance Bands - Orange/Light 19.32 Amazon 04/16/2018 101-1530-4130 Resistance Bands - Yellow/Extra Light 16.10 Amazon 04/16/2018 101-1170-4110 Toner 591.99 Amazon 04/16/2018 101-1160-4530 6 pack AAAA batteries 4.94 Amazon 04/16/2018 400-4126-4703 5 pack usb flash drives 43.98 Amazon 04/16/2018 101-1170-4110 Toner Cartridges 979.92 Amazon 04/16/2018 400-4126-4703 USB c to HDMI, USB c to HDMI/DVI, Screwdriver set 70.97 Amazon 04/16/2018 400-4126-4703 USB c to a, USB c to a 5 pack 28.13 Amazon 04/16/2018 101-1170-4110 HP 61x black toner 252.79 Amazon 04/16/2018 101-1431-4300 Loving approach to dementia care book 18.39 Amazon 04/16/2018 101-1431-4300 What's happening to Grandpa? book 7.56 Amazon 04/16/2018 400-4126-4703 Surfacebook 2 sleeve 23.26 Amazon 04/16/2018 400-4126-4703 Ipad 9.7 case 22.54 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (05/08/2018 - 4:22 PM)Page 1 of 13 Name Check D Account Description Amount Amazon 04/16/2018 101-1431-4300 books about Dementia and Alzheimer's 100.39 Amazon 04/16/2018 101-1160-4530 S8 and S8+ screen protectors 21.88 Amazon 04/16/2018 400-4126-4703 Logitech Wireless presenter laser pointer 87.98 Amazon 04/16/2018 101-1160-4530 12v 3.2ah battery 2 pack 55.82 Amazon 04/16/2018 400-4126-4703 Privacy screen filter 59.99 Amazon 04/16/2018 101-1160-4530 RBC114 Replacement Battery Cartridge 86.00 Amazon 04/16/2018 400-4126-4703 Ipad 2017 cellular 32 GB 442.94 Amazon 04/16/2018 400-4126-4703 Logitech wireless mouse and keyboard 160.74 Amazon 04/16/2018 101-1170-4110 HP 410x Black toner 2 pack 535.00 Amazon 04/16/2018 101-1170-4110 HP 410A Cyan, Yellow, Magenta Combo pack 655.98 Amazon 04/16/2018 101-1170-4110 HP 951 Magenta, HP 950 XL 97.18 Amazon 04/16/2018 101-1170-4110 645A Yellow Toner 314.92 Amazon 04/16/2018 700-0000-4150 Full Face Shields 152.17 Amazon 04/16/2018 700-0000-4240 Safety reflective stickers,Hard hats,Safety shields for helmets 239.42 Amazon 5,575.75 American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus05/03/2018 101-0000-2008 April 2018 premium 39.78 American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 39.78 American Legion 04/16/2018 101-1220-4290 Retiree Breakfast Meeting 50.36 American Legion 50.36 Applebee's 04/16/2018 101-1110-4370 Council Chamber dinners 136.33 Applebee's 136.33 Avesis Third Party Administrators, Inc.04/26/2018 101-0000-2007 vision insurance - may 2018 123.52 Avesis Third Party Administrators, Inc.04/26/2018 700-0000-2007 vision insurance - may 2018 23.88 Avesis Third Party Administrators, Inc.04/26/2018 701-0000-2007 vision insurance - may 2018 17.94 Avesis Third Party Administrators, Inc.04/26/2018 720-0000-2007 vision insurance - may 2018 2.69 Avesis Third Party Administrators, Inc. 168.03 BENSON KAYE L 04/19/2018 101-1539-4300 Fit for Life Instructor 560.00 BENSON KAYE L 560.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 04/19/2018 101-1140-4302 Legel Services 12,555.87 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 12,555.87 Capitol Complex ePark Pay Station 04/16/2018 101-1120-4370 Parking Fee for attending Data Practices seminar 8.00 Capitol Complex ePark Pay Station 8.00 Caribou Coffee 04/16/2018 101-1600-4130 Luminary Walk - Hot Chocolate and Coffee 138.45 Caribou Coffee 138.45 Carver County 04/19/2018 101-1160-4320 CarverLink internet/fiber-April 547.50 Carver County 04/19/2018 101-1210-4300 1st Quarter 2018 overtime-12/25/17-4/1/18 19,840.09 Carver County 05/03/2018 101-1260-4300 Laptop Rental - CSO (4/1/16-3/31/20) 1,667.00 Carver County 05/03/2018 101-1120-4807 PID 25.5700030 - 2018 1st Half Taxes 630.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (05/08/2018 - 4:22 PM)Page 2 of 13 Name Check D Account Description Amount Carver County 05/03/2018 605-0000-4807 PID 25.0362300 - 2018 1st Half Taxes 3,407.00 Carver County 04/26/2018 400-4117-4703 2018 Esri Enterprise License Agreement Yr 2 13,868.92 Carver County 39,960.51 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 05/03/2018 101-1220-4320 March 2018 108.42 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 05/03/2018 101-1350-4320 March 2018 2,832.10 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 05/03/2018 101-1540-4320 March 2018 318.13 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 05/03/2018 101-1550-4320 March 2018 338.11 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 05/03/2018 101-1600-4320 March 2018 25.97 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 05/03/2018 700-0000-4320 March 2018 98.49 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 05/03/2018 700-7019-4320 March 2018 1,581.07 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 05/03/2018 701-0000-4320 March 2018 1,153.34 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 6,455.63 Chanhassen Floral 04/16/2018 101-1110-4370 Flowers for Charlie Siegle's father's funeral 62.00 Chanhassen Floral 62.00 CHOICE ELECTRIC 04/19/2018 700-7019-4150 3 - 30 Amp fuses 47.89 CHOICE ELECTRIC 47.89 Choice, Inc.04/26/2018 101-1220-4350 cleaning 2/12-3/9 199.46 Choice, Inc. 199.46 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 05/03/2018 101-0000-2008 April premium 116.22 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 05/03/2018 700-0000-2008 April premium 70.68 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 05/03/2018 701-0000-2008 April premium 70.68 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 257.58 Compressed Air 04/16/2018 700-7019-4120 4 - Exhaust Mufflers 141.40 Compressed Air 141.40 Costco Wholesale 04/16/2018 101-1560-4130 Tuxedo Cake 79.95 Costco Wholesale 04/16/2018 101-1170-4110 Febreze, Soap, Kleenex, Creamer 58.20 Costco Wholesale 04/16/2018 101-1537-4130 Rice Krispies 10.99 Costco Wholesale 04/16/2018 101-1538-4130 Rice Krispies 10.99 Costco Wholesale 160.13 Cub Foods 04/16/2018 101-1560-4130 Creamer, cookies 12.31 Cub Foods 04/16/2018 101-1560-4130 Juice, Ice Cream, Jello 18.77 Cub Foods 04/16/2018 101-1320-4120 Distilled Water 149.52 Cub Foods 180.60 Custom Hose Tech, Inc.04/26/2018 101-1550-4120 Crimp Fitting, Coupling 168.51 Custom Hose Tech, Inc.04/26/2018 101-1550-4120 Braided Hose, Crimp Fitting, Nylon Cover, Tie Wrap 52.74 Custom Hose Tech, Inc. 221.25 Danial Reem 04/19/2018 101-1539-4300 Zumba class 229.60 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (05/08/2018 - 4:22 PM)Page 3 of 13 Name Check D Account Description Amount Danial Reem 229.60 Davanni's 04/16/2018 101-1110-4370 Council Chamber dinners 110.22 Davanni's 110.22 Delta Dental 04/19/2018 101-0000-2013 dental insurance-May 1,855.28 Delta Dental 04/19/2018 101-0000-2013 dental insurance-May cobra 30.20 Delta Dental 04/19/2018 700-0000-2013 dental insurance-May 280.99 Delta Dental 04/19/2018 701-0000-2013 dental insurance-May 250.79 Delta Dental 04/19/2018 720-0000-2013 dental insurance-May 159.84 Delta Dental 2,577.10 Domino's Pizza 04/16/2018 101-1220-4290 Long Call - pizzas 105.90 Domino's Pizza 105.90 Eventbrite 04/16/2018 101-1250-4360 2018 IBC & IRC Transitioning-Eagan 500.00 Eventbrite 04/16/2018 101-1250-4360 2018 IBC & IRC Transitioning-Vadnais Heights 500.00 Eventbrite 04/16/2018 101-1220-4370 Fire Dynamincs on Your Fireground & Attack from the Burned side 54.84 Eventbrite 04/16/2018 101-1220-4370 Fire Dynamincs on Your Fireground & Attack from the Burned side 54.84 Eventbrite 1,109.68 Facebook 04/16/2018 101-1530-4375 Facebook Ads 4.29 Facebook 4.29 FASTENAL COMPANY 04/19/2018 101-1550-4150 Washers, Screws 7.11 FASTENAL COMPANY 04/26/2018 700-0000-4120 5/16-18x2.5, 2 and 2.25 TRX FLOR 19.11 FASTENAL COMPANY 04/26/2018 101-1320-4120 (3) 8210N95Resp 20CT 41.07 FASTENAL COMPANY 04/26/2018 101-1370-4120 44-7/8 18TPIBndSw3Ct 31.98 FASTENAL COMPANY 04/26/2018 101-1550-4120 3.15x.61WeldOnHinge 38.51 FASTENAL COMPANY 137.78 FedEx Office 04/16/2018 601-6040-4300 Single cuts - Galpin Project 6.40 FedEx Office 6.40 Ferguson Waterworks #2516 04/19/2018 700-0000-4550 4 Zurn No Hub Grate/Sed Bucket Set 727.82 Ferguson Waterworks #2516 04/19/2018 700-0000-4150 Reg Seal Pin Blk 91.97 Ferguson Waterworks #2516 819.79 FORCE AMERICA INC 04/26/2018 101-1320-4120 1028826 Air Sol Valve 12 VDC 42.16 FORCE AMERICA INC 04/26/2018 101-1550-4140 1018014 Switch, DPDT, Rocker,Oslo 36.39 FORCE AMERICA INC 78.55 Fun Express LLC 04/16/2018 101-1612-4130 Easter Egg Candy Hunt-Bags, Puzzles, Tattoos, Stickers, Pencils 376.58 Fun Express LLC 376.58 General Repair Service 04/16/2018 700-7019-4530 4 - Mufflers 277.41 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (05/08/2018 - 4:22 PM)Page 4 of 13 Name Check D Account Description Amount General Repair Service 277.41 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 05/03/2018 400-0000-4300 FTP Tickets 216.30 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 216.30 Grand View Lodge 04/16/2018 101-1120-4370 5/2/18-5/4/18 MCMA Conf Hotel 238.34 Grand View Lodge 04/16/2018 101-1120-4370 5/2/18-5/4/18 MCMA Conf Hotel 215.40 Grand View Lodge 453.74 Graybar Electric Co 04/16/2018 701-0000-4530 Relay Modules 61.09 Graybar Electric Co 61.09 GTS Education Events 04/16/2018 101-1120-4370 2018 MCMA Conference - Todd and Chelsea 1,040.00 GTS Education Events 1,040.00 HALDEMAN - HOMME, INC 05/03/2018 101-1170-4110 File Labels 193.92 HALDEMAN - HOMME, INC 05/03/2018 101-1160-4300 NetLabels Maint and Support Renewal, 3 years 225.00 HALDEMAN - HOMME, INC 418.92 Hallock Company 04/16/2018 701-0000-4530 Phase Sequence Monitor Relay DPDT 430-480 V 326.30 Hallock Company 326.30 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 04/19/2018 700-7019-4160 Chlorine Cylinders 130.00 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 04/19/2018 700-7019-4160 Chlorine Cylinders 80.00 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 210.00 Health Strategies 05/03/2018 101-1220-4300 DOS 4/21/18 450.00 Health Strategies 450.00 Home Depot 04/16/2018 700-0000-4150 Fridge Filter 85.86 Home Depot 85.86 Houlihan's 04/16/2018 101-1520-4370 Meal and drinks 113.58 Houlihan's 113.58 Indelco Plastics Corporation 05/03/2018 700-7019-4150 Coupling, Tee, Nipples, Gauge Guard 350.95 Indelco Plastics Corporation 350.95 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 04/19/2018 101-1170-4110 Pens, Post-Its, Theme Book 67.33 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 04/26/2018 101-1170-4110 Paper, Clips, Pens 54.22 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 04/26/2018 101-1170-4110 Creamer, Paper, Folders 82.95 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 204.50 Jersey Mike's Subs 04/16/2018 101-1520-4370 Southwest Park Meeting 99.21 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (05/08/2018 - 4:22 PM)Page 5 of 13 Name Check D Account Description Amount Jersey Mike's Subs 99.21 Jet.com 04/16/2018 701-0000-4370 Wastewater Collection System Operator Certification Studybook 111.30 Jet.com 111.30 KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 04/26/2018 101-1370-4170 #2 Ultra LS Dyed B10 5,193.80 KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 5,193.80 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 05/03/2018 720-0000-4300 CSAH 14/BOB HAAK DRAINAGE THROUGH MAR 31, 2018 492.90 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 05/03/2018 720-0000-4300 CSAH 14/BOB HAAK DRAINAGE THROUGH FEB 28, 2018 1,462.80 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 05/03/2018 601-6040-4752 GALPIN BLVD RECONSTRUCT SVC THROUGH MAR 31,2018 7,319.28 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 05/03/2018 400-0000-1155 PRIVATE DEV FIELD OBSERV THROUGH MAR 31,2018 3,565.00 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 05/03/2018 601-6040-4752 GALPIN BLVD RECONSTRUCT SVC THROUGH FEB 28,2018 33,008.33 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 45,848.31 KORTERRA INC 04/19/2018 701-0000-4300 KorWeb iOS Mobile App Service Fee 1,000.00 KORTERRA INC 1,000.00 Kwik Trip 04/16/2018 700-0000-4170 Gas 3.33 Kwik Trip 3.33 LOCATORS AND SUPPLIES INC 05/03/2018 701-0000-4260 Red/Black Cords 160.26 LOCATORS AND SUPPLIES INC 160.26 Lunds & Byerly's 04/16/2018 101-1110-4370 City Council meal - mini cupcakes 3.99 Lunds & Byerly's 04/16/2018 101-1600-4130 Luminary Walk - Cookies 81.88 Lunds & Byerly's 85.87 LYMAN LUMBER 04/19/2018 410-0000-4710 6x6-20' Treated Posts 80.00 LYMAN LUMBER 04/19/2018 410-0000-4710 6x6-20' Treated Posts 160.00 LYMAN LUMBER 04/19/2018 101-1550-4150 double payment -61.95 LYMAN LUMBER 04/19/2018 410-0000-4710 6x6 8' Treated #3 So Pine 21.40 LYMAN LUMBER 199.45 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 05/03/2018 701-0000-4551 Head, Attack Tip 12,409.00 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 12,409.00 Marco Inc 04/19/2018 101-1170-4410 Monthly maintenance charges - April 2018 675.65 Marco Inc 04/19/2018 700-0000-4410 Monthly maintenance charges - April 2018 100.00 Marco Inc 04/19/2018 701-0000-4410 Monthly maintenance charges - April 2018 100.00 Marco Inc 04/19/2018 720-0000-4410 Monthly maintenance charges - April 2018 50.00 Marco Inc 925.65 McMaster-Carr 04/16/2018 700-0000-4150 Silicone Foam Strip 69.29 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (05/08/2018 - 4:22 PM)Page 6 of 13 Name Check D Account Description Amount McMaster-Carr 69.29 Menards 04/16/2018 701-0000-4120 Outdoor Wall Clock 16.06 Menards 16.06 Milestone Auto Inc.04/26/2018 101-1170-4140 2010 Impala DW1640 231.00 Milestone Auto Inc. 231.00 Mills Fleet Farm 04/16/2018 700-0000-4240 Men's Shirt 7.64 Mills Fleet Farm 04/16/2018 701-0000-4240 Men's Shirt 7.64 Mills Fleet Farm 15.28 Minnesota Landmarks 04/16/2018 101-1560-4300 "Gangster" character presentation 288.00 Minnesota Landmarks 288.00 MN American Water Works Association 04/16/2018 700-0000-4370 Exam Prep Class Only - William Kistner 60.00 MN American Water Works Association 60.00 MN Dept of Labor and Industry 04/16/2018 101-1250-4360 65.00 MN Dept of Labor and Industry 65.00 MN Pollution Control Agency 04/16/2018 701-0000-4370 Training Certification Admin 23.00 MN Pollution Control Agency 23.00 MN RECREATION & PARK ASSOC.05/03/2018 101-1520-4360 Job Posting - Senior Center Coordinator 100.00 MN RECREATION & PARK ASSOC. 100.00 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 04/19/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges - 3/1/18-4/2/18 193.38 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 05/03/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 138.95 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 05/03/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 38.96 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 04/26/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 3/8/18-4/9/18 106.95 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 478.24 MUSIC TOGETHER LAKESIDE 04/19/2018 101-1537-4300 2018 Winter Classes 1,078.00 MUSIC TOGETHER LAKESIDE 1,078.00 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 04/26/2018 101-1550-4120 Winter Blades, Oil Filters 10.82 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 04/26/2018 700-0000-4120 Wiper Blades, Oil Filters, Blister Capsules 50.28 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 04/26/2018 700-0000-4140 Winter Blades, Oil Filters 18.03 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 04/26/2018 101-1320-4120 Oil Filter, Hydraulic Filter 6.73 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 85.86 National Camera Exchange 04/16/2018 400-4126-4703 Canon XA30 Camcorder and case 1,718.95 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (05/08/2018 - 4:22 PM)Page 7 of 13 Name Check D Account Description Amount National Camera Exchange 1,718.95 Nuss Truck & Equipment 04/26/2018 101-1550-4140 Wiper Mechani, Mirror 87.02 Nuss Truck & Equipment 04/26/2018 101-1320-4140 82713294 Mirror 891.16 Nuss Truck & Equipment 978.18 Office Max/Office Depot 04/16/2018 101-1170-4110 White Index Card Stock 76.91 Office Max/Office Depot 04/16/2018 400-4126-4703 Video Adapter, USBC - HDMI 42.74 Office Max/Office Depot 04/16/2018 400-4126-4703 SDXC Media, 128GB 64.11 Office Max/Office Depot 04/16/2018 700-7019-4150 Dry Erase board, markers 29.80 Office Max/Office Depot 04/16/2018 700-7019-4120 Frames, Index w/tabs, Binders, Pens 36.29 Office Max/Office Depot 04/16/2018 700-0000-4150 Cartridge 32.05 Office Max/Office Depot 04/16/2018 700-0000-4150 Binders, Dividers 18.15 Office Max/Office Depot 300.05 Orbitz.com 04/16/2018 101-1220-4370 Rochester school - Kahler Grand Hotel stay 597.80 Orbitz.com 597.80 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 05/03/2018 701-0000-4140 Oil Press SW 41.08 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 05/03/2018 101-1320-4140 3.5oz Gaskets 15.66 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 05/03/2018 101-1220-4140 42530 Stack 35.19 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 91.93 Painters Gear Inc 04/16/2018 700-0000-4550 Gun Pump is worn out, unit replacement 740.15 Painters Gear Inc 740.15 Party City 04/16/2018 101-1560-4120 Supplies 3.19 Party City 04/16/2018 101-1560-4120 50CT Kiwi Placemats 5.36 Party City 8.55 PayPal 04/16/2018 101-1550-4370 MPSTMA Spring Workshop 2018 90.00 PayPal 90.00 Pedretti Christine Lea 05/03/2018 101-1539-4300 4/24/2018 Gentle Yoga and Vinyasa Yoga 884.00 Pedretti Christine Lea 884.00 Potentia MN Solar 05/03/2018 700-0000-4320 electricity charges - Mar 2018 1,951.32 Potentia MN Solar 05/03/2018 101-1190-4320 electricity charges - Mar 2018 3,628.62 Potentia MN Solar 05/03/2018 101-1170-4320 electricity charges - Mar 2018 2,801.89 Potentia MN Solar 8,381.83 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 05/03/2018 720-7202-4300 Bluff Creek Prairie Management 750.00 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 750.00 Premium Waters, Inc 04/19/2018 101-1550-4120 Monthly services - April 10.30 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (05/08/2018 - 4:22 PM)Page 8 of 13 Name Check D Account Description Amount Premium Waters, Inc 10.30 RBM SERVICES INC 04/26/2018 101-1170-4350 Nightly Janitorial/Shampoo Public Safety Monthly - May 2018 2,962.62 RBM SERVICES INC 04/26/2018 101-1190-4350 Nightly/Weekend Janitorial - May 2018 2,195.00 RBM SERVICES INC 5,157.62 Revolution Dancewear 04/16/2018 101-1535-4130 Dance Costumes 1,386.66 Revolution Dancewear 04/16/2018 101-1535-4130 Dance Costumes 530.00 Revolution Dancewear 1,916.66 Rotary Club 04/16/2018 101-1120-4360 January 2018 dues 53.00 Rotary Club 04/16/2018 101-1120-4360 February 2018 dues 53.00 Rotary Club 04/16/2018 101-1120-4360 March 2018 dues 53.00 Rotary Club 04/16/2018 101-1520-4360 Monthly dues 53.00 Rotary Club 212.00 Saint Paul Hotel 04/16/2018 101-1560-4300 Drinks 1,196.04 Saint Paul Hotel 1,196.04 Sam's Club 04/16/2018 101-1530-4150 General Mdse -7.51 Sam's Club -7.51 Sensible Land Use Coalition 04/16/2018 101-1420-4370 Member Luncheon-Kate Aanenson 44.00 Sensible Land Use Coalition 44.00 Siber Systems Inc 04/16/2018 101-1160-4300 Roboform Annual Renewal 19.95 Siber Systems Inc 19.95 SPRINT PCS 04/26/2018 700-0000-4310 monthly charges 51.72 SPRINT PCS 04/26/2018 701-0000-4310 monthly charges 51.72 SPRINT PCS 103.44 SPS COMPANIES INC 04/26/2018 101-1170-4510 Toilet Valve, Faucet 43.42 SPS COMPANIES INC 43.42 STICHA GREG 04/26/2018 101-1130-4370 SRA meeting lunch and mileage 18.70 STICHA GREG 18.70 STRATOGUARD LLC 04/26/2018 101-1160-4300 ProofPoint Email Filtering Service - May 160.00 STRATOGUARD LLC 160.00 SUMMIT COMPANIES 04/26/2018 101-1370-4300 Svc call for programming changes 275.00 SUMMIT COMPANIES 275.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (05/08/2018 - 4:22 PM)Page 9 of 13 Name Check D Account Description Amount Sun Life Financial 04/26/2018 101-1120-4040 Life Insurance-May 29.90 Sun Life Financial 04/26/2018 101-1130-4040 Life Insurance-May 20.59 Sun Life Financial 04/26/2018 101-1160-4040 Life Insurance-May 10.53 Sun Life Financial 04/26/2018 101-1250-4040 Life Insurance-May 45.36 Sun Life Financial 04/26/2018 101-1310-4040 Life Insurance-May 41.49 Sun Life Financial 04/26/2018 101-1320-4040 Life Insurance-May 48.06 Sun Life Financial 04/26/2018 101-1370-4040 Life Insurance-May 19.01 Sun Life Financial 04/26/2018 101-1520-4040 Life Insurance-May 15.35 Sun Life Financial 04/26/2018 101-1530-4040 Life Insurance-May 6.03 Sun Life Financial 04/26/2018 101-1560-4040 Life Insurance-May 5.94 Sun Life Financial 04/26/2018 101-1600-4040 Life Insurance-May 9.58 Sun Life Financial 04/26/2018 101-1700-4040 Life Insurance-May 2.39 Sun Life Financial 04/26/2018 101-1550-4040 Life Insurance-May 45.07 Sun Life Financial 04/26/2018 101-1420-4040 Life Insurance-May 31.68 Sun Life Financial 04/26/2018 101-1430-4040 Life Insurance-May 1.98 Sun Life Financial 04/26/2018 210-0000-4040 Life Insurance-May 7.65 Sun Life Financial 04/26/2018 720-7201-4040 Life Insurance-May 2.34 Sun Life Financial 04/26/2018 720-7202-4040 Life Insurance-May 2.34 Sun Life Financial 04/26/2018 101-1170-4040 Life Insurance-May 5.31 Sun Life Financial 04/26/2018 101-1220-4040 Life Insurance-May 17.82 Sun Life Financial 04/26/2018 701-0000-4040 Life Insurance-May 34.24 Sun Life Financial 04/26/2018 700-0000-4040 Life Insurance-May 45.58 Sun Life Financial 04/26/2018 720-0000-4040 Life Insurance-May 16.07 Sun Life Financial 04/26/2018 101-0000-2011 Life Insurance-May 693.19 Sun Life Financial 04/26/2018 210-0000-2011 Life Insurance-May 6.00 Sun Life Financial 04/26/2018 700-0000-2011 Life Insurance-May 103.76 Sun Life Financial 04/26/2018 701-0000-2011 Life Insurance-May 103.76 Sun Life Financial 04/26/2018 720-0000-2011 Life Insurance-May 32.34 Sun Life Financial 1,403.36 Target 04/16/2018 720-0000-4120 Moleskine 24.64 Target 04/16/2018 101-1537-4130 Candy - Childs Play 9.65 Target 34.29 TBEI, Inc 05/03/2018 101-1320-4120 Motor RE 45.6 CID 1.25 Keyed Shaft 488.00 TBEI, Inc 488.00 TouchPoint Logic LLC 05/03/2018 210-2100-4706 7" Touch screen, Tabletop Kit, Crestron Programming 1,245.00 TouchPoint Logic LLC 1,245.00 U of M Contlearning 04/16/2018 720-0000-4370 2018 MN Shade Tree Short Course 225.00 U of M Contlearning 225.00 ULTIMATE CONTROLS ELECTRIC LLC 04/19/2018 700-7019-4530 Chanhassen Water Plant Aerator Upgrade 1,435.00 ULTIMATE CONTROLS ELECTRIC LLC 04/19/2018 700-7019-4530 Chanhassen Test Well Transducer 237.50 ULTIMATE CONTROLS ELECTRIC LLC 05/03/2018 701-0000-4551 Chanhassen HOA Replacement Round 3 - Main Water Plant 3,495.00 ULTIMATE CONTROLS ELECTRIC LLC 5,167.50 United Farmers Cooperative 05/03/2018 400-0000-4705 Berti Mower and Skid Shoe set 8,356.89 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (05/08/2018 - 4:22 PM)Page 10 of 13 Name Check D Account Description Amount United Farmers Cooperative 8,356.89 UNITED WAY 04/26/2018 101-0000-2006 PR Batch 00427.04.2018 United Way 28.40 UNITED WAY 28.40 USA BLUE BOOK 04/19/2018 700-0000-4550 Rubber and Total Repair Kits, Gate Valve 782.97 USA BLUE BOOK 782.97 VERIZON WIRELESS 05/03/2018 101-1550-4310 phones charges 3/19/18-4/18/18 563.65 VERIZON WIRELESS 05/03/2018 101-1520-4310 phones charges 3/19/18-4/18/18 51.50 VERIZON WIRELESS 05/03/2018 101-1600-4310 phones charges 3/19/18-4/18/18 84.63 VERIZON WIRELESS 05/03/2018 101-1530-4310 phones charges 3/19/18-4/18/18 51.50 VERIZON WIRELESS 05/03/2018 101-0000-2006 phones charges 3/19/18-4/18/18 10.00 VERIZON WIRELESS 05/03/2018 700-0000-4310 phones charges 3/19/18-4/18/18 565.10 VERIZON WIRELESS 05/03/2018 701-0000-4310 phones charges 3/19/18-4/18/18 431.33 VERIZON WIRELESS 05/03/2018 720-0000-4310 phones charges 3/19/18-4/18/18 118.32 VERIZON WIRELESS 05/03/2018 101-1160-4310 phones charges 3/19/18-4/18/18 113.00 VERIZON WIRELESS 05/03/2018 101-1120-4310 phones charges 3/19/18-4/18/18 374.56 VERIZON WIRELESS 05/03/2018 101-1170-4310 phones charges 3/19/18-4/18/18 31.81 VERIZON WIRELESS 05/03/2018 101-1260-4310 phones charges 3/19/18-4/18/18 103.63 VERIZON WIRELESS 05/03/2018 101-1130-4310 phones charges 3/19/18-4/18/18 51.50 VERIZON WIRELESS 05/03/2018 101-1250-4310 phones charges 3/19/18-4/18/18 144.81 VERIZON WIRELESS 05/03/2018 101-1310-4310 phones charges 3/19/18-4/18/18 209.51 VERIZON WIRELESS 05/03/2018 101-1370-4310 phones charges 3/19/18-4/18/18 120.12 VERIZON WIRELESS 05/03/2018 101-1320-4310 phones charges 3/19/18-4/18/18 632.55 VERIZON WIRELESS 05/03/2018 101-1220-4310 phones charges 3/19/18-4/18/18 488.10 VERIZON WIRELESS 05/03/2018 101-1220-4310 phones charges 3/19/18-4/18/18 40.01 VERIZON WIRELESS 4,185.63 Walgreens 04/16/2018 101-1530-4130 Cheese balls 10.00 Walgreens 10.00 Wal-Mart 04/16/2018 101-1560-4130 Party Beads, Mints 18.76 Wal-Mart 18.76 Water Conservation Services, Inc.04/26/2018 700-0000-4552 Leak 4/4/18 @ Hwy 41 and Hwy 7 behind the strip mall 366.93 Water Conservation Services, Inc. 366.93 WAYTEK INC 04/26/2018 101-1550-4120 Terminal for Relay Connector, Cable Ties 99.06 WAYTEK INC 99.06 WEISSMAN 04/16/2018 101-1535-4130 Dance Costumes 420.53 WEISSMAN 420.53 WENCK ASSOCIATES INC 05/03/2018 720-0000-4300 Lake Lucy Lane Culvert Replacement svc through March 31, 2018 2,574.50 WENCK ASSOCIATES INC 2,574.50 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (05/08/2018 - 4:22 PM)Page 11 of 13 Name Check D Account Description Amount Witmer Public Safety Group, Inc.04/26/2018 101-1220-4120 Leather Fronts - Chanhassen, Engineer, Fire Dept 60.49 Witmer Public Safety Group, Inc. 60.49 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 05/03/2018 701-0000-4300 OMS Sewer Televising History Import svc through Feb 28, 2018 780.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 05/03/2018 700-0000-4300 OMS Facilities Implementation svc through Feb 28, 2018 702.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 05/03/2018 701-0000-4300 OMS Pavement Distress History Import svc through Feb 28, 2018 780.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 05/03/2018 700-0000-4300 Cartegraph OMS Training svc through Feb 28, 2018 766.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 05/03/2018 601-6038-4752 Orchard Lane Area Street & Utility Reconstruction Project 18-01 315.25 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 05/03/2018 601-6032-4752 Minnewashta Manor Wetland Restoration Project svc through Feb 28 1,473.25 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 05/03/2018 601-6032-4752 Street Reconstruction Project No. 16-01 svc through Feb 28, 2018 1,030.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 05/03/2018 720-0000-4300 Avienda Development Stormwater Review svc through Mar 31, 2018 3,969.75 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 05/03/2018 700-7047-4752 West Water Treatment Plant svc through Feb 28, 2018 20,419.31 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 05/03/2018 601-6033-4752 Park Road Mill and Overlay svc through Feb 28, 2018 4,140.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 34,375.56 WW Grainger 04/16/2018 701-0000-4530 Tempco Screw-in Base 22.55 WW Grainger 22.55 WW GRAINGER INC 04/19/2018 101-1370-4260 Tap,Plug,#6-32, Uncoated, 2 FLT 38.58 WW GRAINGER INC 38.58 XCEL ENERGY INC 05/03/2018 101-1170-4320 electricity charges -523.46 XCEL ENERGY INC 05/03/2018 101-1190-4320 electricity charges -728.51 XCEL ENERGY INC 05/03/2018 101-1220-4320 electricity charges 802.35 XCEL ENERGY INC 05/03/2018 101-1370-4320 electricity charges 1,824.69 XCEL ENERGY INC 05/03/2018 101-1120-4320 electricity charges 66.87 XCEL ENERGY INC 05/03/2018 700-0000-4320 electricity charges 228.09 XCEL ENERGY INC 05/03/2018 701-0000-4320 electricity charges 228.08 XCEL ENERGY INC 05/03/2018 101-1540-4320 electricity charges 156.35 XCEL ENERGY INC 05/03/2018 101-1600-4320 electricity charges 40.28 XCEL ENERGY INC 05/03/2018 101-1550-4320 electricity charges -132.38 XCEL ENERGY INC 05/03/2018 101-1600-4320 electricity charges 152.04 XCEL ENERGY INC 05/03/2018 701-0000-4320 electricity charges 4,414.10 XCEL ENERGY INC 05/03/2018 700-0000-4320 electricity charges 184.43 XCEL ENERGY INC 05/03/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 17,558.04 XCEL ENERGY INC 04/26/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 54.21 XCEL ENERGY INC 04/26/2018 700-0000-4320 electricity charges 4,967.99 XCEL ENERGY INC 04/26/2018 700-7019-4320 electricity charges 2,437.22 XCEL ENERGY INC 04/26/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges - 3/14/18 to 4/12/18 -8.74 XCEL ENERGY INC 04/26/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges - 3/14/18 to 4/12/18 11.31 XCEL ENERGY INC 04/26/2018 700-0000-4320 electricity charges - 3/12/18 to 4/10/18 570.02 XCEL ENERGY INC 04/26/2018 101-1600-4320 electricity charges - 3/18/18 to 4/16/18 12.12 XCEL ENERGY INC 04/26/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges - 3/14/18 to 4/12/18 4.58 XCEL ENERGY INC 04/26/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges - 3/14/18 to 4/12/18 25.95 XCEL ENERGY INC 04/26/2018 101-1600-4320 electricity charges - 3/14/18 to 4/12/18 -16.53 XCEL ENERGY INC 04/26/2018 700-0000-4320 electricity charges - 3/14/18 to 4/12/18 -4.89 XCEL ENERGY INC 04/26/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges - 3/14/18 to 4/12/18 Pedestrian Flashers 23.62 XCEL ENERGY INC 32,347.83 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC 04/26/2018 101-1320-4120 Gutter broom, 10x32" Poly conv. wafer K 2,007.20 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC 04/26/2018 101-1320-4120 100-STRIP BROOM, 200-10-32-KCV 1,451.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (05/08/2018 - 4:22 PM)Page 12 of 13 Name Check D Account Description Amount ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC 3,458.20 272,579.11 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (05/08/2018 - 4:22 PM)Page 13 of 13 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, May 14, 2018 Subject New Businesses issued Sign Permits in January, February, and March, 2018 Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: J.2. Prepared By File No: ATTACHMENTS: 2018 First Quarter Sign Permits Issued New Businesses Issued Sign Permits January, 2018 Business Name Site Address Type of Business Target (sign alternations) 851 W est 78th Street Retail Minnetonka West Middle School (Alter Monument Sign to Monument w/electronic reader) 6421 Hazeltine Blvd. School February, 2018 Business Name Site Address Type of Business State Farm 99 Lake Drive East Insurance March, 2018 Business Name Site Address Type of Business Idly Dosai International Market 406 West 78th Street Market Healthy for Life Meals 391 West 78th Street Healthy Foods Mathews Harwood Floors 7914 Kerber Blvd. Hardwood Floors g:\plan\forms\sign permits\sign permits issued 2018-1.doc