Loading...
2018 06 25 Agenda PacketAGENDA CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, JUNE 25, 2018 CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD A.5:30 P.M. ­ WORK SESSION (FOUNTAIN CONFERENCE ROOM) Note:  Work sessions are open to the public.If the City Council does not complete the work session items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regular agenda. 1.Key Financial Strategy: GreenStep Cities Program 2.Key Financial Strategy: Parks Replacement Schedule 3.2019 Initial Budget Discussion B.7:00 P.M. ­ CALL TO ORDER (COUNCIL CHAMBERS) C.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS 1.Invitation to 4th of July Celebration D.CONSENT AGENDA All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council and will be considered as one motion.  There will be no separate discussion of these items.  If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately.  City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item.  Refer to the council packet for each staff report. 1.Approval of City Council Minutes dated June 11, 2018 2.Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated June 5, 2018 3.Receive Park & Recreation Minutes dated May 22, 2018 4.Ordinance 633: Pervious Pavers City Code Amendment (Chapters 7 and 20) 5.Ordinance 634: Beekeeping (Amending City Code Chapters 4, 5, and 20) 6.Conditional Use Permit 2018­08: Approve Xcel Energy Transmission Line to be located south of the intersection of Audubon Road and Lyman Boulevard E.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS F.FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE AGENDACHANHASSEN CITY COUNCILMONDAY, JUNE 25, 2018CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARDA.5:30 P.M. ­ WORK SESSION (FOUNTAIN CONFERENCE ROOM)Note:  Work sessions are open to the public.If the City Council does not complete the worksession items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regularagenda.1.Key Financial Strategy: GreenStep Cities Program2.Key Financial Strategy: Parks Replacement Schedule3.2019 Initial Budget DiscussionB.7:00 P.M. ­ CALL TO ORDER (COUNCIL CHAMBERS)C.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS1.Invitation to 4th of July CelebrationD.CONSENT AGENDAAll items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council andwill be considered as one motion.  There will be no separate discussion of these items.  Ifdiscussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and consideredseparately.  City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item.  Refer to thecouncil packet for each staff report.1.Approval of City Council Minutes dated June 11, 20182.Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated June 5, 20183.Receive Park & Recreation Minutes dated May 22, 20184.Ordinance 633: Pervious Pavers City Code Amendment (Chapters 7 and 20)5.Ordinance 634: Beekeeping (Amending City Code Chapters 4, 5, and 20)6.Conditional Use Permit 2018­08: Approve Xcel Energy Transmission Line to belocated south of the intersection of Audubon Road and Lyman BoulevardE.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS F.FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE 1.Law Enforcement Update 2.Fire Department Update G.OLD BUSINESS H.PUBLIC HEARINGS I.NEW BUSINESS 1.Resolution No. 2018­37: Galpin Boulevard Study ­ Adopt Resolution in Support of Study Findings 2.Avienda: Approve Final Plat and Grading Permit J.COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS K.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS L.CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION 1.Website Analytics Overview ­ May 2018 2.Municipal Legislative Commission Board of Directors Meeting Agenda June 6, 2018 3.Review of Claims Paid 06­25­2018 M.ADJOURNMENT N.GUIDELINES GUIDELINES FOR VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Welcome to the Chanhassen City Council Meeting.  In the interest of open communications, the Chanhassen City Council wishes to provide an opportunity for the public to address the City Council.  That opportunity is provided at every regular City Council meeting during Visitor Presentations. Anyone indicating a desire to speak during Visitor Presentations will be acknowledged by the Mayor.  When called upon to speak, state your name, address, and topic.  All remarks shall be addressed to the City Council as a whole, not to any specific member(s) or to any person who is not a member of the City Council. If there are a number of individuals present to speak on the same topic, please designate a spokesperson that can summarize the issue.  Limit your comments to five minutes.  Additional time may be granted at the discretion of the Mayor.  If you have written comments, provide a copy to the Council. During Visitor Presentations, the Council and staff listen to comments and will not engage in discussion.  Council members or the City Manager may ask questions of you in order to gain a thorough understanding of your concern, suggestion or request. Please be aware that disrespectful comments or comments of a personal nature, directed at an individual either by name or inference, will not be allowed.  Personnel concerns should be directed to the City Manager. Members of the City Council and some staff members may gather at Houlihan's, 530 Pond Promenade in Chanhassen immediately after the meeting for a purely social event.  All members of the public are welcome. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 25, 2018 Subject Key Financial Strategy: GreenStep Cities Program Section 5:30 P.M. ­ WORK SESSION (FOUNTAIN CONFERENCE ROOM) Item No: A.1. Prepared By Jill Sinclair, Environmental Resources Specialist File No:  BACKGROUND The City Council selected to consider GreenStep Cities as a part of the Key Financial Strategies for 2018. In April, the council met with the Chanhassen Environmental Commission and briefly discussed the program as a part of their joint meeting and asked the commission for their recommendation on the program. Tonight city staff will be joined by an Environmental Commissioner for a PowerPoint presentation to the council. DISCUSSION GreenStep Cities is a voluntary, non­regulatory program created by the state to promote best management practices focused on cost savings and energy use reduction. The program challenges, assists and recognizes cities to improve practices that affect sustainability and quality of life in that community. There are 29 best practices that the program is based upon which are then broken down into 170 actions that a city can take to improve various areas such as surface water quality, mobility options, and comprehensive plans. Each action works to advance a certain aspect of the city.  GreenStep Cities recognize participating communities as a Step 1, Step 2, Step 3…city, dependent on the actions that the city has completed. A Step 1 City has passed a resolution stating the city’s intention to participate in the program. A Step 2 City has completed 8 best practices and posted a report on the actions. A Step 3 City has completed another 8 best practices, for a total of 16. A Step 4 City has reported on 7 to 10 core metrics, providing quantitative results of the multiple actions taken. A Step 5 City has challenged itself to improve upon all of the Step 4 metrics. Elk River is a Step 5 GreenStep City. Rosemount is a Step 2 city. Our neighboring communities include Victoria, a Step 3 city; Eden Prairie, a Step 5 city; Shorewood, a Step 1 city; and Minnetonka, a Step 3 city. Cities participating in the program are offered resources such as over 3,000 reports provided by other cities documenting what actions are being taken, making it easy to learn from peer cities. It also offers special opportunities for funding and technical assistance. The GreenStep Cities program is an independent program tailored to Minnesota cities and provides maximum flexibility and choice in how to implement best practices.  Staff recommends that the council take a minute to watch a video of city staff from GreenStep cities on how the program has helped their city:  https://youtu.be/swsG6Q68X5c CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 25, 2018 Subject Key Financial Strategy: Parks Replacement Schedule Section 5:30 P.M. ­ WORK SESSION (FOUNTAIN CONFERENCE ROOM) Item No: A.2. Prepared By Adam Beers, Park Superintendent File No:  SUMMARY The Chanhassen Park and Recreation Department manages 30 community and neighborhood parks totaling 466 acres. These amenities offer area residents, employees, and visitors numerous opportunities for active recreation while providing invaluable benefits to the community's physical and mental health. Through the process of developing the Parks and Recreation System Plan, it was determined that maintenance updates need to be made to continue to adequately serve the needs of the community.  A park system inventory and replacement schedule was created while developing the park system plan.  The parks replacement plan identifies recommended updates based on existing equipment/facility conditions. BACKGROUND Chanhassen has been acquiring and constructing community and neighborhood parks for 50 years.  To date, a dedicated fund to finance the repair or replacement of the park equipment has not been established.  This proposed initiative would establish a parks replacement fund at a level of $250,000 per year on average and initiate a prioritized parks replacement schedule. DISCUSSION The oldest equipment within our parks, including such items as playgrounds, courts, rinks and fencing, has reached an age and condition beyond repair and is need of replacement.  RECOMMENDATION The Park and Recreation Commission unanimously recommended on May 22, 2018 that the City Council establish a Parks Replacement Fund and approve the 2019­2023 Parks Replacement Schedule. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, June 25, 2018SubjectKey Financial Strategy: Parks Replacement ScheduleSection5:30 P.M. ­ WORK SESSION(FOUNTAIN CONFERENCEROOM)Item No: A.2.Prepared By Adam Beers, Park Superintendent File No: SUMMARYThe Chanhassen Park and Recreation Department manages 30 community and neighborhood parks totaling 466acres. These amenities offer area residents, employees, and visitors numerous opportunities for active recreation whileproviding invaluable benefits to the community's physical and mental health. Through the process of developing theParks and Recreation System Plan, it was determined that maintenance updates need to be made to continue toadequately serve the needs of the community.  A park system inventory and replacement schedule was created whiledeveloping the park system plan.  The parks replacement plan identifies recommended updates based on existingequipment/facility conditions.BACKGROUNDChanhassen has been acquiring and constructing community and neighborhood parks for 50 years.  To date, adedicated fund to finance the repair or replacement of the park equipment has not been established.  This proposedinitiative would establish a parks replacement fund at a level of $250,000 per year on average and initiate a prioritizedparks replacement schedule.DISCUSSIONThe oldest equipment within our parks, including such items as playgrounds, courts, rinks and fencing, has reached anage and condition beyond repair and is need of replacement. RECOMMENDATION The Park and Recreation Commission unanimously recommended on May 22, 2018 that the City Council establish a Parks Replacement Fund and approve the 2019­2023 Parks Replacement Schedule. ATTACHMENTS: Funding Options for Park Replacement Fund Proposed Park Replacement Schedule 2019­2023 Park Replacement Project Detail Proposed Park Replacement Schedule Powerpoint Funding Options for Park Replacement Fund – As mentioned earlier in the presentation, the funding need going forward is approximately $250,000 per year. A committed ongoing funding source that is potentially available, that would not result in an increase in the overall levy of the city, is the elimination of the Library Building Bonds repayment Levy of $465,000 after the 2021 budget year. Staff would suggest a portion of that levy could be used to fund the park replacement fund going forward starting in 2022 in the amount of $250,000. The 2017 General Fund surplus is roughly $480,000, of which $80,000 is committed for the final remaining park picnic shelter program, leaving $400,000 in general fund surplus available at the city council’s discretion. Staff would recommend that the remaining $400,000 of the 2017 surplus and $350,000 of the anticipated 2018 General Fund surplus be used to start the Park Replacement Fund. Location Proposed Budget 2019 Herman Field Park (Playground)55,000 Prairie Knoll Park (Playground)95,000 Sunset Ridge Park (Playground) 95,000 245,000 2020 Curry Farms Park (Basketball Court & Trail)25,000 Lake Ann Park (Beach Playground)80,000 Powers Blvd (Piperail Fence)15,000 Rice Marsh Lake Park (Backstop & Benches)15,000 Meadow Green Park (Backstops & Benches)25,000 South Lotus Lake Park (Playground)95,000 255,000 2021 Carver Beach Park (Playground)55,000 Lake Susan Park (Basketball Court)20,000 Pheasant Hills Park (Playground) 95,000 Roundhouse Park (Structure)20,000 Stone Creek Park (Playground)55,000 245,000 2022 Bandimere Park (Playground)150,000 North Lotus Park (Hockey Rink)100,000 250,000 2023 Carver Beach (Playground) 55,000 Power Hill Park (Playground)100,000 Sugarbush Park (Playground)100,000 255,000 Total - 1,250,000 Park Replacement Schedule 2019-2023 Park Replacement Schedule Project Detail 2019 Herman Field Park: $55,000 o Removal of existing playground equipment will be completed utilizing park maintenance staff o Install new playground equipment Picnic shelter, playground border and engineered wood fiber base material were installed in 2017. Prairie Knoll Park: $95,000 o Removal of existing playground equipment, border material and base material will be completed utilizing park maintenance staff o Install playground equipment o Install concrete border o Install engineered wood fiber base material Sunset Ridge Park: $95,000 o Removal of existing playground equipment, border, and base material will completed using park maintenance staff o Install playground equipment o Install Concrete border o Install Engineered wood fiber base material Total Projected Cost - $245,000 2020 Curry Farms Park Basketball Court & Trail: $25,000 o Mill and overlay existing basketball court o Restripe court surface o Replace basketball pole and hoop o Remove and replace existing damaged section of trail near basketball court Lake Ann Park Beach Playground: $80,000 o Removal of existing playground equipment, border and base material will be completed utilizing park maintenance staff o Install new playground equipment o Install concrete border o Install engineered wood fiber base material Powers Blvd Pipe Rail Fence: $15,000 o Remove and replace 450’ of pipe rail fence Rice Marsh Lake Park Backstop and Ballfield Benches: $15,000 o Removal of existing backstop and ballfield benches will be completed utilizing park maintenance staff o Install new backstop and ballfield benches Meadow Green Park Backstop and Ballfield Benches: $25,000 o Removal of existing backstop and ballfield benches will be completed utilizing park maintenance staff o Install new backstop and ballfield benches South Lotus Lake Park Playground: $95,000 o Removal of existing playground equipment, border and base material will be completed utilizing park maintenance staff o Install new playground equipment o Install concrete border o Install engineered wood fiber base material 2021 Carver Beach Park Playground: $55,000 o Removal of existing playground equipment, border and base material will be completed utilizing park maintenance staff o Install new playground equipment o Install concrete border o Install engineered wood fiber base material Lake Susan Park Basketball Court: $20,000 o Removal of existing basketball court and new base material will be prepped utilizing park maintenance staff o Install new bituminous court o Stripe and paint court Pheasant Hills Park Playground: $95,000 o Removal of existing playground equipment, border and base material will be completed utilizing park maintenance staff o Install new playground equipment o Install concrete border o Install engineered wood fiber base material Roundhouse Park Structure: $20,000 o Replace existing windows o Paint exterior of building o Replace carpet inside building o Replace access door to building o Replace concrete entrance stoop Stone Creek Park Playground: $55,000 o Removal of existing playground equipment will be completed utilizing park maintenance staff o Install new playground equipment Picnic shelter, playground border and engineered wood fiber base material were installed in 2016 2022 Bandimere Park Playground: $150,000 o Removal of existing playground equipment, border and base material will be completed utilizing park maintenance staff o Install new playground equipment o Install “poured in place” rubber base material North Lotus Park Hockey Rink: $ 100,000 o Removal of existing boards and base material will be completed utilizing park maintenance staff o Install new bituminous surface o Install new hockey boards 2023 Carver Beach Playground: $55,000 o Removal of existing playground equipment, border and base material will be completed utilizing park maintenance staff o Install new playground equipment o Install concrete border o Install engineered wood fiber base material Power Hill Park Playground: $100,000 o Removal of existing playground equipment, border and base material will be completed utilizing park maintenance staff o Install new playground equipment o Install concrete border o Install engineered wood fiber base material Sugarbush Park playground: $100,000 o Removal of existing playground equipment, border and base material will be completed utilizing park maintenance staff o Install new playground equipment o Install concrete border o Install engineered wood fiber base material Proposed Parks Replacement Schedule Proposed Parks Replacement Schedule 2019-2023 Park Replacement Schedule 2019-2023 Location Proposed Budget 2019 Herman Field Park (Playground)55,000 Prairie Knoll Park (Playground)95,000 Sunset Ridge Park (Playground) 95,000 245,000 2020 Curry Farms Park (Basketball Court & Trail)25,000 Lake Ann Park (Beach Playground)80,000 Powers Blvd (Piperail Fence)15,000 Rice Marsh Lake Park (Backstop & Benches)15,000 Meadow Green Park (Backstops & Benches)25,000 South Lotus Lake Park (Playground)95,000 255,000 2021 Carver Beach Park (Playground)55,000 Lake Susan Park (Basketball Court)20,000 Pheasant Hills Park (Playground) 95,000 Roundhouse Park (Structure)20,000 Stone Creek Park (Playground)55,000 245,000 2022 Bandimere Park (Playground)150,000 North Lotus Park (Hockey Rink)100,000 250,000 2023 Carver Beach (Playground) 55,000 Power Hill Park (Playground)100,000 Sugarbush Park (Playground)100,000 255,000 Total -1,250,000 Herman Field Park Playground: $55,000 o Removal of existing playground equipment will be completed utilizing park maintenance staff o Install new playground equipment Picnic shelter, playground border and engineered wood fiber base material were installed in 2017. Prairie Knoll Park Playground: $95,000 o Removal of existing playground equipment, border material and base material will be completed utilizing park maintenance staff o Install playground equipment o Install concrete border o Install engineered wood fiber base material Sunset Ridge Park Playground: $95,000 o Removal of existing playground equipment, border, and base material will be completed using park maintenance staff o Install playground equipment o Install Concrete border o Install Engineered wood fiber base material Total Projected Cost -$245,000 2019 Proposed Park Replacements Curry Farms Park Basketball Court & Trail: $25,000 o Mill and overlay existing basketball court o Replace basketball pole and hoop o Restripe court surface o Remove and replace existing damaged section of trail near basketball court Lake Ann Park Beach Playground: $80,000 o Removal of existing playground equipment, border and base material will be completed utilizing park maintenance staff o Install new playground equipment o Install concrete border o Install engineered wood fiber base material Powers Blvd Pipe Rail Fence: $15,000 o Remove and replace 450’ of pipe rail fence Rice Marsh Lake Park Backstop and Ballfield Benches: $15,000 o Removal of existing backstop and ballfield benches will be completed utilizing park maintenance staff o Install new backstop and ballfield benches Meadow Green Park Backstop and Ballfield Benches: $25,000 o Removal of existing backstop and ballfield benches will be completed utilizing park maintenance staff o Install new backstop and ballfield benches South Lotus Lake Park Playground: $95,000 o Removal of existing playground equipment, border and base material will be completed utilizing park maintenance staff o Install new playground equipment o Install concrete border o Install engineered wood fiber base material Total Projected Cost -$255,000 2020 Proposed Park Replacements Carver Beach Park Playground: $55,000 o Removal of existing playground equipment, border and base material will be completed utilizing park maintenance staff o Install new playground equipment o Install concrete border o Install engineered wood fiber base material Lake Susan Park Basketball Court: $20,000 o Removal of existing basketball court and new base material will be prepped utilizing park maintenance staff o Install new bituminous court o Stripe and paint court Pheasant Hills Park Playground: $95,000 o Removal of existing playground equipment, border and base material will be completed utilizing park maintenance staff o Install new playground equipment o Install concrete border o Install engineered wood fiber base material Roundhouse Park Structure: $20,000 o Replace existing windows o Paint exterior of building o Replace access door to building o Replace concrete entrance stoop Stone Creek Park Playground: $55,000 o Removal of existing playground equipment will be completed utilizing park maintenance staff o Install new playground equipment Picnic shelter, playground border and engineered wood fiber base material were installed in 2016 Total Projected Cost -$245,000 2021 Proposed Park Replacements Bandimere Park Playground: $150,000 o Removal of existing playground equipment, border and base material will be completed utilizing park maintenance staff o Install new playground equipment o Install “poured in place” rubber base material North Lotus Park Hockey Rink: $ 100,000 o Removal of existing hockey boards and bituminous base material will be completed utilizing park maintenance staff o Install new bituminous surface o Install new hockey boards Total Projected Cost -$250,000 2022 Proposed Park Replacements Carver Beach Playground: $55,000 o Removal of existing playground equipment, border and base material will be completed utilizing park maintenance staff o Install new playground equipment o Install concrete border o Install engineered wood fiber base material Power Hill Park Playground: $100,000 o Removal of existing playground equipment, border and base material will be completed utilizing park maintenance staff o Install new playground equipment o Install concrete border o Install engineered wood fiber material Sugarbush Park playground: $100,000 o Removal of existing playground equipment, border and base material will be completed utilizing park maintenance staff o Install new playground equipment o Install concrete border o Install engineered wood fiber base material Total Projected Cost -$255,000 2023 Proposed Park Replacements •Damaged and unsafe plastic playground borders •Rusted and dilapidated posts and play structure components •Rotten wood frame playground border •Damaged slide components have been removed and replaced with panels because parts are no longer manufactured Proposed Replacements •Sinking footings cause structures to lean •Custom repairs are made in-house for outdated equipment that is no longer manufactured •Non-ADA compliant surfacing •Window panels no longer function due to material deterioration Proposed Replacements Proposed Replacements •Basketball court has major surface cracking causing tripping hazards as well as making playability difficult •Severe court delamination •Bench and post footings have moved causing structures to lean and become safety hazards •Existing basketball pole is cracked and leaning •Court surface has settled and holds water •Trail section is completely deteriorated •Rotten exterior boards need to be replaced •Exterior paint is failing •Replace damaged windows Proposed Replacements Proposed Replacements •Concrete footings are heaved causing tripping hazards also making it difficult to maintain ice throughout the winter •Wooded panels are splintering due to deterioration •Concrete/bituminous surfaces are cracked and failing Proposed Replacements •Pipe rails are extremely rusted and disintegrating •Posts have broken from footings causing sections to lean and become a safety hazard CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 25, 2018 Subject 2019 Initial Budget Discussion Section 5:30 P.M. ­ WORK SESSION (FOUNTAIN CONFERENCE ROOM) Item No: A.3. Prepared By Greg Sticha, Finance Director File No:  BACKGROUND It is the time of year again when we begin preliminary discussion of the 2019 budget.At this work session, the council will receive information on some of the factors influencing the 2019 budget.Staff would like council feedback on any items of concern and direction for department heads as they prepare their budgets.It should be noted that staff will review operational efficiencies and effectiveness and identify key drivers affecting cost and service performance levels with the goal of achieving the right balance for each department. As a reminder the budget document will include two years of budgeted revenues and expenditures but only the first year is officially adopted. Attached is a calendar for the remainder of the year reflecting meeting dates and significant deadlines for completion of the 2019 budget.If any of the dates appear to conflict with other known city deadlines or budget requirements, please let me know as soon as possible. Market Value & New Construction Value:Carver County has informed the city that new construction growth for 2018 is 0.97%.This new construction value has a direct impact on the budgeting process and will result in an approximate $103,600 increase in new tax growth available for 2018.The total market value for the city increased 7.17% for 2018, which is used for 2019 property taxes.Residential values increased by 7.52% in 2018 for taxes payable in 2019. It is extremely important to note that an increase in total market value does not mean property taxes will decrease, assuming no change in the amount levied from the previous year.In the simplest terms, the tax rate is a product of the total taxable market value and the total tax levy dollars requested. Police Contract:Initial discussions with Carver County for the 2019 policing services contract have indicated there will be no change in the overall total cost for 2019.  Due to significant turnover in a number of positions, overall total wages in those positions will be lower as compared to last year's contract. Wage Adjustments:We are estimating cost­of­living increases in the metro area to be around 2.0%­3.0%.Also, we are planning on an additional 1% in potential merit­based pay included in the department budgets.In addition, market adjustments are included for department head positions for 2019. Healthcare:The city is in the last year of a healthcare contract with a not­to­exceed increase of 18% for 2019.The impact to the general fund of a 18% increase in the healthcare contract would be about $106,000. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, June 25, 2018Subject2019 Initial Budget DiscussionSection5:30 P.M. ­ WORK SESSION(FOUNTAIN CONFERENCEROOM)Item No: A.3.Prepared By Greg Sticha, Finance Director File No: BACKGROUNDIt is the time of year again when we begin preliminary discussion of the 2019 budget.At this work session, the councilwill receive information on some of the factors influencing the 2019 budget.Staff would like council feedback on anyitems of concern and direction for department heads as they prepare their budgets.It should be noted that staff willreview operational efficiencies and effectiveness and identify key drivers affecting cost and service performance levelswith the goal of achieving the right balance for each department. As a reminder the budget document will include twoyears of budgeted revenues and expenditures but only the first year is officially adopted.Attached is a calendar for the remainder of the year reflecting meeting dates and significant deadlines for completion ofthe 2019 budget.If any of the dates appear to conflict with other known city deadlines or budget requirements,please let me know as soon as possible.Market Value & New Construction Value:Carver County has informed the city that new construction growth for2018 is 0.97%.This new construction value has a direct impact on the budgeting process and will result in anapproximate $103,600 increase in new tax growth available for 2018.The total market value for the city increased7.17% for 2018, which is used for 2019 property taxes.Residential values increased by 7.52% in 2018 for taxespayable in 2019.It is extremely important to note that an increase in total market value does not mean property taxes will decrease,assuming no change in the amount levied from the previous year.In the simplest terms, the tax rate is a product of thetotal taxable market value and the total tax levy dollars requested.Police Contract:Initial discussions with Carver County for the 2019 policing services contract have indicated therewill be no change in the overall total cost for 2019.  Due to significant turnover in a number of positions, overall totalwages in those positions will be lower as compared to last year's contract.Wage Adjustments:We are estimating cost­of­living increases in the metro area to be around 2.0%­3.0%.Also,we are planning on an additional 1% in potential merit­based pay included in the department budgets.In addition,market adjustments are included for department head positions for 2019. Healthcare:The city is in the last year of a healthcare contract with a not­to­exceed increase of 18% for 2019.The impact to the general fund of a 18% increase in the healthcare contract would be about $106,000. Other Adjustments:There are a number of other smaller adjustments that staff is preparing for in the 2019 budget and those include small increases for additional services for the assessing and legal contracts, a small increase in the general liability and workers compensation insurance premiums, a number of increases to seasonal and part time positions in order to remain competitive and/or to meet minimum wage standards and an adjustment for a Planning Department position.All of these total approximately $87,000 and are listed in the attached spreadsheet. Based on staff's initial review of the 2019 budget, we are not anticipating any changes in service levels for next year. DISCUSSION Staff requests feedback from the city council regarding the level of the initial tax levy and how many alternative budget scenarios the city council would like presented.  Staff would also like feedback on the budget calendar.  This feedback will give clear direction to department directors as they prepare their 2019 and 2020 budget requests. ATTACHMENTS: Carver County Assessment Report 2019 Budget Calendar General Fund Estimated Changes Residential Commercial/Industrial Apartment Ag Total 2018 EMV $3,810,563,200 $493,043,200 $81,218,200 $54,250,400 $4,439,075,000 2017 EMV $3,515,780,000 $459,150,900 $65,852,300 $61,237,700 $4,102,020,900 Total Value Change $294,783,200 $33,892,300 $15,365,900 ($6,987,300) $337,054,100 New Construction $30,457,000 $8,696,300 $3,740,200 $0 $42,893,500 Market Change $264,326,200 $25,196,000 $11,625,700 ($6,987,300) $294,160,600 % New Construction 0.80% 1.76% 4.61% 0.00% 0.97% % Market Change 7.52% 5.49% 17.65% -11.41% 7.17% 2018 Total % Increase 8.38% 7.38% 23.33% -11.41% 8.22% City of Chanhassen 2018 Assessment Summary Residential 86% Commercial/ Industrial 12% Apartment 2% Ag 1%Residential Commercial/In dustrial Apartment Ag Chanhassen Value Distribution 2018 Residential Commercial/I ndustrial Agricultural Apartments Other Total 1998 EMV $1,076,661,500 $155,066,800 $26,166,800 $12,695,100 $2,713,600 $1,273,303,800 1999 Change before N/C $14,789,800 ($4,681,800) ($356,700) $25,600 ($489,400) $9,776,900 1999 New Construction $81,551,500 $8,502,500 $104,700 $0 $0 $90,158,700 1999 Total Value Change $96,341,300 $3,820,700 ($252,000) $25,600 ($489,400) $99,935,600 1999 EMV $1,173,002,800 $158,887,500 $25,917,500 $12,720,700 $2,224,200 $1,373,239,400 1999 % Market Change Before New Construction 1.37% -3.02% -1.36% 0.20% -18.04% 0.77% 1999 Total % Change 8.95% 2.46% -0.96% 0.20% -18.04% 7.85% City of Chanhassen1999 Assessment Agricultural values and Other values reflect change in use. Commercial/Industrial values reflect tax court judgements. Date Task Forum June 25, 2018 Discuss 2019 Budget expectations with City Council Work Session July 5, 2018 Distribute 2018 General Ledger Detail, 2019 & 2020 Operating Budget Preparation Worksheets, 2019-2023 CIP worksheets July 19, 2018 2019 & 2020 Payroll and Revenue Projections Distributed July 27, 2018 Completed Operating Budget Forms Returned to Finance July 23, 2018 Review 2nd quarter revenue activity to date & Investments Work Session August 5, 2018 Powerpoint for detailed budget discussion distributed August 13, 2018 Update & Preliminary Budget and Levy Discussion Work Session August 15, 2018 Department heads return their departments powerpoint Information to finance August 27, 2018 Budgets (detailed powerpoint presentation to city council) Work Session September 7, 2018 All 2019-2023 CIP Requests Returned to Finance September 24, 2018 Approval/Certification of Maximum Proposed City Council Meeting Preliminary Levy to Carver County Auditor October 8, 2018 2019-2023 CIP review & discussion of 2019 Special Work Session Revenue & Enterprise fund Budgets November 13, 2018 Review Annual Rate Study with City Council Work Session November 26, 2018 Rate Study, Budget or CIP discussion if needed Work Session December 3, 2018 Truth in Taxation Hearing City Council Meeting December 10, 2018 Adopt Final Levy & 2019 Budget and 2019-2023 CIP City Council Meeting Item Fiscal Budget Impact Increases to General Fund Budget Wage Increases (3%) and other small adjustments for changes in new hires (144,000)$ Market Adjustments (55,600) Police Contract - Health Insurance (18%)(106,000) Adjust Planning Dept Position (22,000) Seasonal & Temp Sal Adjustments (25,000) Legal Costs for New Development (15,000) Assessing Contract and New Parcels (10,000) Increase in General Liab & Work Comp Insurance (15,000) TOTAL (392,600) Decreases to General Fund Budget New Growth (Estimate at 0.97%)103,600 Adjust Building Permit Revenue Adjust Equipment Fund Levy New Cell Tower Revenue 80,000 Adjust Sealcoat Levy Reduction in costs that result in service level changes in the General Fund Elimination of Crime Prevention Spec Increased Int Revenue Levy above New Growth TOTAL 183,600 Net Needed to Fund Levy with No change in City portion of Property Tax Bill (209,000) City of Chanhassen Analysis of Changes for the 2019 General Fund Budget CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 25, 2018 Subject Invitation to 4th of July Celebration Section PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS Item No: C.1. Prepared By Katie Mathews, Recreation Supervisor File No:  SUMMARY I am excited to invite everyone to the City of Chanhassen’s largest community event of the year—the 35th Annual 4 th of July Celebration!  This celebration will be held on July 2, 3, & 4.  The event is presented by the City of Chanhassen and sponsored by the 2018 Community Event Sponsors. MONDAY, JULY 2 Family Night at the Carnival from 3­10 pm Pony Rides from 3­8 pm TUESDAY, JULY 3 Activities begin at 3:30 pm and include: SouthWest Metro Chamber of Commerce Business Expo Rotary Club of Chanhassen presents the Taste of Chanhassen and Beer & Wine Garden Carnival Rides & Concessions Kiddie Parade Skate Board Competition Live Music by Ragtown And the ever­popular street dance featuring Casa Blanca Orchestra from 7­11 pm WEDNESDAY, JULY 4 Events start early again with the adult fishing contest on Lake Ann at 7 am.  Other events throughout the day at City Center Park and Lake Ann include: Kids fishing contest Medallion Hunt Live music by American Bootleg Carnival Rides and Concessions Rotary Club of Chanhassen presents the Taste of Chanhassen and Beer & Wine Garden Rotary Club of Chanhassen’s Classic Car Show Parade sponsored by the Chanhassen Rotary Club CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, June 25, 2018SubjectInvitation to 4th of July CelebrationSectionPUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS Item No: C.1.Prepared By Katie Mathews, Recreation Supervisor File No: SUMMARYI am excited to invite everyone to the City of Chanhassen’s largest community event of the year—the 35th Annual 4 thof July Celebration!  This celebration will be held on July 2, 3, & 4.  The event is presented by the City of Chanhassenand sponsored by the 2018 Community Event Sponsors.MONDAY, JULY 2Family Night at the Carnival from 3­10 pmPony Rides from 3­8 pmTUESDAY, JULY 3Activities begin at 3:30 pm and include:SouthWest Metro Chamber of Commerce Business ExpoRotary Club of Chanhassen presents the Taste of Chanhassen and Beer & Wine GardenCarnival Rides & ConcessionsKiddie ParadeSkate Board CompetitionLive Music by RagtownAnd the ever­popular street dance featuring Casa Blanca Orchestra from 7­11 pmWEDNESDAY, JULY 4Events start early again with the adult fishing contest on Lake Ann at 7 am.  Other events throughout the day at CityCenter Park and Lake Ann include:Kids fishing contestMedallion HuntLive music by American BootlegCarnival Rides and ConcessionsRotary Club of Chanhassen presents the Taste of Chanhassen and Beer & Wine Garden Rotary Club of Chanhassen’s Classic Car Show Parade sponsored by the Chanhassen Rotary Club Be sure to join us for a spectacular fireworks display over Lake Ann at 10 pm.  Bring your families, neighbors, and friends for three days of fun!  I look forward to seeing everyone there! CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 25, 2018 Subject Approval of City Council Minutes dated June 11, 2018 Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.1. Prepared By Nann Opheim, City Recorder File No:  PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves the minutes dated June 11, 2018.” Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. ATTACHMENTS: City Council Work Session Minutes dated June 11, 2018 City Council Summary Minutes dated June 11, 2018 City Council Verbatim Minutes dated June 11, 2018 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JUNE 11, 2018 Mayor Laufenburger called the work session to order at 5:30 p.m. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Laufenburger, Councilwoman Tjornhom, Councilman McDonald, Councilwoman Ryan, and Councilman Campion STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Chelsea Petersen, Kate Aanenson, Paul Oehme, Todd Hoffman, Vanessa Strong, and MacKenzie Walters PUBLIC PRESENT: None. Mayor Laufenburger thanked Councilman Campion for being present and speaking at the grand opening of Fox Woods Preserve. REVIEW PRIORITIES FOR DOWNTOWN VISION STUDY. Bryan Harjes with Hoisington-Koegler Group, Inc. reviewed highlights of the Downtown Chanhassen Vision Plan update. He discussed the existing downtown vision plan, key take aways from the stakeholder engagement meetings, results of the online questionnaire, market scan, demographic trends using Met Council projections for population, households, and employment projections, connectivity, proposed enhancements for intersection crossings, land use and sub-districts, and implementation. Afterwards he discussed the Survey Monkey rankings. Kate Aanenson noted that background information is available on the City’s website and explained how planning has been done in the past and what can be done in the future using this information. Mayor Laufenburger asked for clarification on how the results of this update should be used by the City Council. Bryan Harjes explained that this is a planning document to be used in future planning. Councilwoman Ryan asked about action items associated with items that ranked high on the survey. Todd Gerhardt explained how action items will be implemented and acted on. Councilman Campion asked that council members receive updates on how the plan is progressing. Mayor Laufenburger asked when the plan update can go from being a draft to an approved working document. Councilwoman Ryan asked for more in depth information on the study. Mayor Laufenburger expressed concern with some of the principles in the document such as some of the guiding principles, draw from the environment, and park once, shop twice. He would prefer changing the wording to say enhance pedestrian safety in the downtown. Mayor Laufenburger discussed how Highway 5 breaks up the downtown area and asked if a circulator bus has been used in the past. Todd Gerhardt discussed how the City did use a circulator bus which was not warmly received. Mayor Laufenburger asked that Bryan Harjes and staff review the Survey Monkey ranking as he had 1 as highest, not lowest and bring it back for review at a future work session. City Council Work Session – June 11, 2018 2 PERVIOUS PAVERS CODE AMENDMENT UPDATE. MacKenzie Walters provided background information on work done by staff and discussed concerns raised by the Planning Commission that they would like council members to take into consideration when approving this item. After comments and discussion about the concerns voiced by Planning Commission, although council members did appreciate the concerns raised by the Planning Commission they did not believe they were impediments to implementing the ordinance. Mayor Laufenburger asked that the amendment changes be done for 3 years and then reviewed by the City Council at that time. DISCUSS GALPIN PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT. Kate Aanenson introduced Joe Jablonski and Steve Accor with Lennar who reviewed the different architecture being proposed for a development on Galpin Boulevard. Mayor Laufenburger asked what discretion is given to home buyers for exterior finishes. Joe Jablonski continued with discussion of the potential plat layout. Councilwoman Ryan stated she was very concerned with the proposed lot sizes not fitting in with surrounding neighborhoods. Mayor Laufenburger stated he was in favor of preserving the property around Lake Ann. Kate Aanenson explained how this item will move forward through staff, Planning Commission and City Council. Mayor Laufenburger asked for clarification on lot sizes for previous projects done by Lennar. Mayor Laufenburger adjourned the work session at 7:05 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES JUNE 11, 2018 Mayor Laufenburger called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Laufenburger, Councilwoman Tjornhom, Councilman McDonald, Councilwoman Ryan, and Councilman Campion STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Chelsea Petersen, Kate Aanenson, Paul Oehme, Todd Hoffman, MacKenzie Walters, Sue Bill, and Jodi Sarles PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: Mayor Laufenburger presented a Maple Leaf Award to Marilyn Luthy for 18 years of volunteer service in the Senior Center. (There was a short recess in the meeting to serve birthday cake in honor of Marilyn Luthy.) CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman McDonald moved, Campion seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager’s recommendations: 1. Approval of City Council Minutes dated May 29, 2018 2. Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated May 15, 2018 3. Ordinance 632: Amendments to City Code, Chapters 1, 4, 10 and 20 4. Accept Mediated Settlement Agreement with Diverse Construction Services, LLC All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. TOUR DE TONKA 2018: TIM LITFIN WITH MINNETONKA COMMUNITY EDUCATION. Tim Litfin with Minnetonka Community Education presented a power point presentation highlighting past Tour de Tonka events and outlining the events scheduled for 2018. PUBLIC HEARING: VENUE/ALDI PROPERTY: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF EASEMENT RIGHTS. Paul Oehme presented the staff report on this item. Mayor Laufenburger opened the public hearing. No one spoke and the public hearing was closed. City Council Summary – June 11, 2018 2 Resolution #2018-36: Councilman McDonald moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded to approve the termination and release of all of its rights and interest in the 2004 easement in it’s entirety, including but not limited to, releasing its rights and interests in the easement being vacated. All voted in favor, except Councilwoman Ryan and Councilman Campion who opposed, and the motion carried with a vote of 3 to 2. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS. Mayor Laufenburger noted that Councilman Campion spoke at the grand opening of the Fox Woods Preserve and discussed the Chanhassen Red Birds schedule of games. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Todd Gerhardt provided an update on the tour schedule for the west water treatment plant. Councilwoman Ryan moved, Councilman McDonald seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The City Council meeting was adjourned at 7:45 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING JUNE 11, 2018 Mayor Laufenburger called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Laufenburger, Councilwoman Tjornhom, Councilman McDonald, Councilwoman Ryan, and Councilman Campion STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Chelsea Petersen, Kate Aanenson, Paul Oehme, Todd Hoffman, MacKenzie Walters, Sue Bill, and Jodi Sarles Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you and for the record let it be noted that all members of the City Council are here this evening, thank you. And also I want to welcome all of you to our council meeting this evening. To those of you that are present in the chambers as well as those of you that may be watching on Mediacom cable channel or through the world wide web at Chanhassen’s website. And for those of you that cannot see everybody there’s about 25 people here in the chamber to celebrate a special recipient of an award this evening. First action tonight is our agenda. Council members are there any modifications to the agenda as printed this evening? Alright there being none we will proceed as it is printed. PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: PRESENTATION OF MAPLE LEAF AWARD TO MARILYN LUTHY. Mayor Laufenburger: The first item on the agenda is a presentation of a Maple Leaf Award, and I’m going to do this from out front here so. Marilyn I want you to come join me right here. Marilyn Luthy: Oh right there? Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. You want to be on my left? Marilyn Luthy: Yeah I’m left handed. Mayor Laufenburger: Are we okay? Have you got this one? Are we good? Okay. Ladies and gentlemen I want to present to you, this is Marilyn Luthy. Marilyn Luthy is a Chanhassen resident of 24 years and tonight we are recognizing her as a Senior Center volunteer for 18 years. 2000 to 2018. In addition to recognizing her for her community service tonight she is also celebrating her, and I got approval to use this number. This is her, this is your 89th birthday Marilyn. Congratulations and I see that you and I both visited the hair dresser today. Marilyn Luthy: Of course the beauty shops are usually places where you hear a lot of gossip. Chanhassen City Council – June 11, 2018 2 Mayor Laufenburger: Yes. Well Rhonda’s been pretty tight lipped about you Marilyn. But prior to volunteering for the City Marilyn’s career included working for 34 years as an accountant for Minneapolis Moline and 14 years as a secretary for Vernco. After her retirement Marilyn wanted to stay connected with the community and decided to volunteer at the Senior Center. Her duties over the past 18 years have included greeting people and answering questions about the Senior Center both in person and on the phone in a friendly and professional manner. She’s also worked at the office usually every Thursday providing office coverage whenever needed including answering the phone, taking registrations, mailing program, activity information, general setup and operation of activities and programs. A real right hand person to Sue Bill. Marilyn would also serve as an escort on Senior Center day trips. In addition to her volunteer work Marilyn was also involved in the community in other ways. She was on the Senior Advisory Board member for several years. A member of the Senior Commission for a term. She was a book club group leader for 10 years and the Women’s Club President for several years. So Marilyn on behalf of the City of Chanhassen I’d like to recognize and thank you for your 18 years of dedicated volunteer service to the community and we also wish you a happy 89th, I changed it to say 29th. Marilyn Luthy: Well that’s what it says. Mayor Laufenburger: Marilyn this is for you as a hopefully a memento. Let me just read it. It says presented to Marilyn Luthy, Senior Citizen Volunteer 2000 to 2018 in recognition of outstanding service and dedication to the community. And it hence has the names of the Chanhassen City Council members. This is known as the City of Chanhassen’s Maple Leaf Award. Marilyn, congratulations. Marilyn Luthy: Thank you very much. And I do want to thank the city staff because they were always so helpful to me. Respectful to me and of course Sue, if it wouldn’t be for Sue I wouldn’t be here. Sue Bill: I was up all night baking. Happy 89th Birthday. We’re going to have, are we going to have a quick little break for birthday cake. Mayor Laufenburger: What we’re going to do is we’re going to recess for about 5 minutes. We’re going to get some cake cut. We’re going to eat it and then we’re going to reconvene. Marilyn thank you. And I will always remember today because it’s my granddaughter’s birthday today as well so Marilyn you and Jessica are both celebrating today. Thank you very much Marilyn. (There was a short recess at this point in the meeting.) Mayor Laufenburger: Let’s bring this council meeting back to order. Thank you again for, whoever arranged for the cake and Happy Birthday to Marilyn and anybody who’s celebrating their birthday today. Chanhassen City Council – June 11, 2018 3 CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman McDonald moved, Campion seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager’s recommendations: 1. Approval of City Council Minutes dated May 29, 2018 2. Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated May 15, 2018 3. Ordinance 632: Amendments to City Code, Chapters 1, 4, 10 and 20 4. Accept Mediated Settlement Agreement with Diverse Construction Services, LLC All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. TOUR DE TONKA 2018: TIM LITFIN WITH MINNETONKA COMMUNITY EDUCATION. Mayor Laufenburger: We use this time at every regularly scheduled council meeting for anyone to address the council on a matter not on the agenda. They may step to the podium with their name and address and we have one of those pre-arranged tonight so Tim, you want to join us at the podium. State your name and your official business here. Tim Litfin: Good evening Mr. Mayor, council members and staff and community. Thanks for having me here. My name is Tim Litfin, Community Education Director with Minnetonka Schools and I’m here to talk about the 2018 Tour de Tonka which I’m sure many of you will be at and riding again this year and so it’s coming up real quick. Summer is kind of here weather wise but it will definitely be here on Saturday, August 4th. Mr. Mayor has helped us in the past with some broadcasting and announcing and we appreciated that so here’s a little bit of Tour de Tonka by the numbers from past years and a couple of numbers there and I won’t have you guess at these but 24. That’s the number of communities that Tour de Tonka will go through this year so it’s going in 3 counties and 24 cities wide so Tour de Tonka is a pretty good size event. 42 represents the number of states that have sent riders to Tour de Tonka so far in it’s 12 year history. That’s a number that most would not guess but it’s become a destination event for people who want to come to beautiful areas like this and ride their bikes and that’s a good thing. 88 over on the right hand side, we had an 88 year old gentleman ride the event last year. That’s oldest rider to date so if anybody’s out there, Marilyn and would like to ride in the event we’ll take you and put you on the screen and she’s already eating her cake and gone and that’s fine. There’s 108 agencies like the City of Chanhassen, public works, parks and recreation that help us make sure this event is safe and happens every year and that’s a big thank you to all of those for helping us do that. 616 up there represents the number of volunteers that helped at the event last year. That’s a major number and it’s a big work force that comes all together to make this event happen every year. 11,954 is the rest stop food costs so we spend a lot of money on making sure you are entertained at your rest stops so come hungry. Come thirsty. And then the last number, Chanhassen City Council – June 11, 2018 4 the big one there is the amount of money that we spent on law enforcement to make sure this event is safe last year and that’s an important number for us because it has to be safe and we’re thankful to Carver County, Chanhassen Fire this year is helping out, as are many other agencies so I’ll get into some of that in a little bit. Anybody out there wanting to volunteer, council, other, Tour de Tonka is welcomed to all volunteers and just simply go to Tour de Tonka.org and you’ll be wearing a great shirt like that and help us out in many different ways. We had all kinds of opportunities for volunteers. Last year, just taking a step in reverse, you can see the number of riders that were represented last year in the 7 different ride distances with the 100 mile leading the way with 773 riders. Many of these rides proudly come through Chanhassen in one way shape or form and Paul makes sure our roads are good to go and we appreciate his support and participation with us as well in that effort. Next little slide there shows where the riders came from last year. We had 166 different communities show riders or bring riders to that event. Good half of the counties in Minnesota sent riders with 40. Many states and several countries as well so it was kind of fun. 42 states as I mentioned earlier have participated in 12 years. It’s kind of fun. So here are the rider states. These are the fun states. These are the ones we like to cheer about and then we’ve got these anti’s here so if anybody out there knows one of these red states could you bring them into the yellow fold, we’d appreciate that but every year we seem to pick off one or two. Last year we picked off Utah as a rider and we also picked off I believe the, where’s the other one? It might have been Kansas so we’re trying to get a couple of these reds in there but we’re doing quite well. It’s fun. People do come for the event now. It’s not because they’re staying with an aunt or an in-law anymore. They’re coming to be part of a fun event. Top 10 communities, you can see Chanhassen right there. Always in the top 4 or 5 and last year they had over 200 riders just with a Chanhassen address so that’s a pretty popular event for Chanhassen. And for everyone and you can see those other communities are right around us. Here’s the top 20 communities and again more communities right around us and a couple picking up steam there. You can see Minnetrista gained from the previous year as did Eagan so you see Eagan and Woodbury in the top frames so we’re pushing east a little bit more and then you go to the top 40 you see communities that, some are and some aren’t around us and that’s okay but all of those top communities represent a lot of fun, that’s for sure. Demographically speaking Tour de Tonka has pretty much lived in the 30, 40 and 50 year old demographic and that’s fine. It’s open to all. Our youngest rider has been 4 years old and that was last year so last year we had a 4 year old rider without training wheels. We did have a 5 year old rider with training wheels a couple years ago and we’re okay with that. However you want to do it. It’s not a race. It’s a ride so go for it and that little 4 year old did a 16 mile. Last year we had an 11 year old, two 11 year olds ride the 100 mile ride and so that’s impressive. I’m sure they were from Chanhassen. We raised money for the ICA Food Shelf as well as some youth programming and there’s my good friend Ron Kamps. Good community supporter and he loves this event as does the ICA because it spreads the word about their need and their want and that’s a good thing for them. Tour de Tonka cities are all listed there. Of course Chanhassen, you can see them right at the top of that list. It doesn’t matter if they’re alphabetical or not, they’d still be at the top of the list so thank you Chanhassen for all you do for this event. Police and fire, you can see they’re up there as I mentioned before. These are the good players that we have and new to the event this year is Chanhassen Fire is going to help us out and we certainly appreciate that and we Chanhassen City Council – June 11, 2018 5 need that help and support to keep this event safe for all. Those are the ride distances that are available this year. We did add an eighth ride just again to keep safety on top of mind so we’re hoping to split off some 48’s and 30’s by putting a 36 mile ride in there and it really doesn’t add a lot of extra leg to the event but it does, and hopefully will make a safer event for some of those folks. It gives them another distance to pick from. Councilmember Ryan that’s your’s 36? Councilwoman Ryan: 100. Tim Litfin: 100, yes. Good for you. Here’s a, when you throw Tour de Tonka at one map, these are all the distances right there so you can see where there’s lot of entertainment and food at all the rest stops. There’s over 20 musicians, some bands, some DJ’s at the event. It’s just a hoot. Here in Chanhassen at the elementary school is one of the rest stops. It’s a great rest stop. 30 and 36 mile rides will comes through there and it’s really fun so if you want to get out and you’re in Chanhassen that day stop over there and cheer those riders on. Stop by and see what it’s all about. You can be there between the hours of about 8:30 and 11:00 and you can see all kinds of riders at that rest stop right there. And here again I just talked about the rest stops so that’s where they are. Sponsorship is appreciated for any event and this event is of course no different and we’ve got some wonderful partners that we like to celebrate with this event. Here’s a t-shirt that Todd Gerhardt will be wearing this year as a rider and so new artwork this year just to celebrate some nice countryside and some urban, suburban rural feel that the event really gives you. It’s kind of fun. Also a nice rider and volunteer gift is a cap this year and councilmembers you now have a little pop socket for your phone so do with what you may with that. Last year we also had a unicyclist take part in that event. He did 16 miles and I’m sure for him was very easy. For me it would be quite difficult. And some more event photos and just some fun pics from the event. It’s coming up very quickly on Saturday, August 4th and again if anyone’s out there wants to ride or volunteer, Tour de Tonka.org will get you there and we’re excited for the event and we’re not quite ready but we’ll be there on August 4th Mr. Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: This is the 13th annual. Tim Litfin: Yes sir. Mayor Laufenburger: 13. In your case 13 is a lucky number. Tim Litfin: Yeah it’s always lucky. Any number’s a lucky number. Mayor Laufenburger: Well tell us Tim what was the origination of Tour de Tonka? What got it started? Tim Litfin: Well I was new to Minnetonka as the Community Education Director one year prior to that and I wanted to have some type of an event that would be you know a calling to this is done by Minnetonka Community Education and there’s a lot of great things that you could pick from but there are not many bike rides. There are some but there aren’t many and I thought well Chanhassen City Council – June 11, 2018 6 let’s start a bike ride. You know it’s a good thing. There’s a lot of beautiful countryside around here and so that was it. Drew it up on a napkin one night in my kitchen and that will work and year one I thought we’ll have about 200 riders because we marketed it quite well. Well we had almost 900 in year one. Mayor Laufenburger: Wow. Tim Litfin: So I had to throw that napkin away. Mayor Laufenburger: How many race lengths did you have at that time? Tim Litfin: How many? Mayor Laufenburger: Race lengths. Tim Litfin: Oh we had 3 in year one. Mayor Laufenburger: Three rides. Tim Litfin: Three distances. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Tim Litfin: And even before year one was spawned all the veteran riders like Ms. Ryan over here were asking when the 100 mile ride would happen so we put that out there in year 3 but it took a couple years but it’s come alone nicely with great committee. We had Tour de Tonka committee with good ideas, support and help and then the cities like Chanhassen and other really it’s been a privilege to partner and walk and talk with all of you because it’s not, it’s not a big high dollar thing that is there to just raise bookoo bucks. It’s participation to see these beautiful communities. That’s what it’s all about. Mayor Laufenburger: Yeah well it’s a herculean effort that you and your volunteers put into preparation for this. All the signs. All the markings. It’s just, it’s phenomenal and it really is a rallying point at this time of year. It’s kind of the precursor, after this comes the State Fair and then the summer’s over right? Tim Litfin: This is just like that. It is a marker on the calendar and we hear that year round. People call us on August 5th they’ll be calling, what’s the date and what color is the shirt next year. That will be the two questions we get. Mayor Laufenburger: Well Tim thank you. Not only for this but thank you for your efforts with community education in Minnetonka. I know that there’s a lot of people in the Chanhassen community that participate in that as well so. Chanhassen City Council – June 11, 2018 7 Tim Litfin: There are indeed. Mayor Laufenburger: So we look forward to an exciting day. August 4, 2018. The 13th annual. How many riders are you expecting this year? Tim Litfin: We believe we’ll top 3,500. Mayor Laufenburger: Isn’t that amazing? Tim Litfin: Yeah. Mayor Laufenburger: Just amazing. Tim Litfin: Yeah that’s a good share. Mayor Laufenburger: And you said you had to throw away that napkin. You had to get a bigger napkin. Tim Litfin: Yeah we did. And that’s the way planning is. You always want to push out beyond where you’re at and that happened for us and made us better planners. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright. Tim Litfin: Yeah. Mayor Laufenburger: Well let’s see, how do I do this here? I’ll get to it in a second. Bike ride Tour de Tonka okay. There we go. Thank you Tim. Tim Litfin: Thank you Mr. Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: Any questions or comments? Yeah there was a horn at one time. Thanks Tim. Best of luck to you. Tim Litfin: Appreciate it very much. Have a good evening. Mayor Laufenburger: That’s an exciting event that many people in Chanhassen take part in and by the way some of those people list Excelsior, they live in Chanhassen too so let’s remember that. Councilman Campion: I did it last year with my 6 year old son connected to me on third wheel. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright. Chanhassen City Council – June 11, 2018 8 Councilman Campion: This year I’m trying to push him off the third wheel and get him to ride it on his own. Mayor Laufenburger: Earn his own miles right. Of course. Yeah I’m with Councilmember Ryan. I’m that 100 mile club. PUBLIC HEARING: VENUE/ALDI PROPERTY: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF EASEMENT RIGHTS. Mayor Laufenburger: Who’s is this? Todd Gerhardt: Paul. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Oehme, alright go ahead. Paul Oehme: Thank you. Mayor and city council members. This is a release of easement at 525 West 78th Street approximately so this is in the downtown area in Chanhassen just south of the old cinema. Just a little background on the easement itself. The easement is actually a private easement. Was signed and approved between 3 agencies back in April 7th of 2004, Frontier Cinema, Bloomberg Companies and the Southwest Transit Commission. Since then things have changed out there. A portion of the Frontier plat was where this easement was originally dedicated has been replatted in 2009 with the addition of the Chanhassen transit station and with that plat there was an Outlot B that was dedicated to the City for Market Street and the easement in question has been encumbered by that plat. Outlot B which now the City has some rights to and some obligations to so the developer of the Venue is requesting that this easement be vacated at this time. The easement is shown here just, and it’s basically all the parking lot south of the cinema and encompasses some of 78th Street or Market Street shown here in green. The area in blue over here is the area that the easement is over Outlot B that we would like to vacate and so again it’s staff’s recommendation that the City terminates and releases all the rights and interest to the 2004 easement in it’s entirety including but not limited to the release of it’s rights and interest in the easement to be vacated and that’s in Outlot B. So with that if there’s any questions by the City Council I’d be more than happy to try to answer them but I’d request that a public hearing be opened for this item. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Before we open the public hearing is there any question for Mr. Oehme from council? Anybody? Alright. At this time as statute is required, as statute requires I will open a public hearing regarding the termination and release of this easement. If there’s anybody who would like to speak regarding this matter may come to the podium and address the council. There being no public comment at this time I will close the public hearing and bring it back to the council for comment or action. Anybody? Or questions of staff. Mr. Oehme did, was there a time that we, we in the City actually needed this? Chanhassen City Council – June 11, 2018 9 Paul Oehme: No. It was, Mr. Mayor there was really no need for the City to be a part of this easement. It’s a joint easement access and parking agreement between those 3 private entities so the City really didn’t have any jurisdiction or need for that easement. Mayor Laufenburger: Does this affect the property lines of the properties at all? Paul Oehme: It does not. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. Councilman McDonald: Mr. Mayor if you’re ready I’ll make a motion. Mayor Laufenburger: We’ll accept your motion. Councilman McDonald: I would propose that the City Council approves the termination and release of all of it’s rights and interest in the 2004 easement in it’s entirety including but not limited to releasing it’s rights and interest in the easement being vacated. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, we have a valid motion. All those in favor. Excuse me I need a second. Councilman McDonald: You need a second. Mayor Laufenburger: Is there a second? Councilwoman Tjornhom: Second. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you very much Councilmember Tjornhom. So we have a motion to terminate and release the rights and interest of a 2004 easement in it’s entirety. Is there any discussion on this? Resolution #2018-36: Councilman McDonald moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded to approve the termination and release of all of its rights and interest in the 2004 easement in its entirety, including but not limited to, releasing its rights and interests in the easement being vacated. All voted in favor, except Councilwoman Ryan and Councilman Campion who opposed, and the motion carried with a vote of 3 to 2. Mayor Laufenburger: Let it be noted that members McDonald, Tjornhom and Laufenburger voted in favor. Members Ryan and Campion voted in opposition. That motion carries 3-2. That’s the last item of business. Chanhassen City Council – June 11, 2018 10 COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS. Mayor Laufenburger: Is there any council presentations this evening? I was just going to make a comment that this weekend there was a grand opening of the Fox Woods Preserve Park and Councilmember Campion stood in my place with remarks and I understand the weather could have cooperated a little bit maybe the rain added to the ambiance a little bit of the park, is that correct Councilmember Campion? Councilman Campion: It did. It was a great event. There was a pretty decent turn out despite the weather. As the clock struck 9:00 a.m. and it was time to cut the ribbon there were a fair number, maybe 20 or so residents at that time despite the thunder and rain and probably you know after that probably another 20 plus showed up and walked the path and it was kind of neat with the canopy of trees over you and the rain coming down. It was very neat. Mayor Laufenburger: And Fox Woods Preserve is a great addition to the assembly of parks that we have in Chanhassen. I know it will become a very popular destination for people that want to walk in the woods. They can get a nice vista of that pond and it’s a wonderful addition so. Councilman Campion: Yeah it was a beautiful .66 mile loop with some of the trees and plants marked along the route with some descriptive signs and a few bridges and it was very nice. Mayor Laufenburger: You may even encounter a member of the animal kingdom, you know foxes. Frogs. Councilman Campion: Turkeys. Todd Gerhardt: Bull frogs. Mayor Laufenburger: Bull frogs. Turkeys, exactly. Exactly, so thanks very much. Just another council presentation. We have a baseball game coming up this coming Wednesday at Chanhassen’s high school Storm Red Bird Stadium. The Chanhassen will be taking on, is it this Sunday? No, the following Wednesday. The 20th right? Todd Hoffman: June 20th. Mayor Laufenburger: Yeah, on Wednesday the 20th, June 20th the Chanhassen Red Birds will be taking on the, I think it’s the Dundas Dukes and this will be the annual City of Chanhassen employee, volunteer, commissioners and Eastern Carver County School District recognition night and we will have a special appearance by the Superintendent of Eastern Carver County Schools and a member of the City Council will be present to throw a ceremonial first pitch and I don’t want to say too much about who that might be but I think he’s got his warm up gear in place and he’s probably been practicing that pitch with his son or daughter so we look forward to suitable harassment of Councilmember, I mean whoever Dan chooses to throw that first pitch. Chanhassen City Council – June 11, 2018 11 But anyway on a Red Birds note the Red Birds are now I think it’s 8 and 1 or 9 and 1. They beat Victoria last night. We did not have a bet with Victoria. Would have been a good night to have a bet but they won 4 to 1 last night and they’re on a roll. Ranked 2nd in the state so it’s definitely baseball season here in Chanhassen. Anything else from council? ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Gerhardt any administrative presentations? Todd Gerhardt: Well I did have one. We still haven’t got to give you your tour of the west water treatment plant but with the wet weather it’s kind of delayed some of our back filling and seeding in the area so we did not want to take you out in the mud and really want to get the place seeded down and so we haven’t forgot about your tour and it will probably occur in the next couple of weeks so look for that invitation by email. Mayor Laufenburger: Perfect. Anything else? Todd Gerhardt: That’s it. Mayor Laufenburger: With that I’ll entertain a motion for adjournment. Councilwoman Ryan moved, Councilman McDonald seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The City Council meeting was adjourned at 7:45 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 25, 2018 Subject Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated June 5, 2018 Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.2. Prepared By Nann Opheim, City Recorder File No:  PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council receives the Planning Commission minutes dated June 5, 2018.” Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. ATTACHMENTS: Summary Minutes Verbatim Minutes CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES JUNE 5, 2018 Chairman Aller called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Andrew Aller, Mark Undestad, Steve Weick, Nancy Madsen, John Tietz, and Michael McGonagill MEMBERS ABSENT: Mark Randall STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; and MacKenzie Walters, Planner PUBLIC PRESENT: Richard Hamblin 340 Sinner Circle Tom Braman 8040 Stevens, Bloomington PUBLIC HEARING: 1110 LAKE SUSAN DRIVE: LOT COVER VARIANCE. MacKenzie Walters presented the staff report on this item. Commissioner McGonagill asked for clarification on how the 25 percent hard cover number was determined. Commissioner Madsen asked if staff had explored other options i.e. pervious pavers. Commissioner Weick asked about the 150,000 square foot lot size in the subdivision. The applicant, Mark Erickson discussed his request to build a shed. Chairman Aller opened the public hearing. No one spoke and the public hearing was closed. Undestad moved, McGonagill seconded that the Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 3 percent lot coverage variance subject to the following conditions and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision: 1. The applicant must apply for and receive a zoning permit. 2. Lot coverage may not exceed 3,157 square feet. All voted in favor, except for Commissioner Weick who opposed, and the motion carried with a vote of 5 to 1. PUBLIC HEARING: 340 SINNEN CIRCLE: LOT COVER VARIANCE. Planning Commission Summary – June 5, 2018 2 MacKenzie Walters presented the staff report on this item. The applicant Richard Hamblin, 340 Sinnen Circle discussed his proposed garage addition. Chairman Aller opened the public hearing. No one spoke and the public hearing was closed. Madsen moved, Undestad seconded that the Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 5 foot front yard setback variance subject to the following conditions and adopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decisions: 1. The applicant must apply for and receive a building permit. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. PUBLIC HEARING: TRANSMISSION LINE: AUDUBON AND LYMAN CUP. Kate Aanenson presented the staff report on this item Brian Sullivan with Xcel Energy introduced Gene Kotz with Xcel Energy and Tom Braman with Westwood Engineering before explaining how the route for the transmission line was chosen to service the city of Chaska. Chairman Aller opened the public hearing. No one spoke and the public hearing was closed. Undestad moved, Tietz seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit to allow a transmission line to be located south of the intersection of Audubon Road and Lyman Boulevard as shown in the attached Exhibit A, Planning Case 18-08, and subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval of the Conditional Use Permit is contingent upon final approval of the EA and a resolution declaring no need for an Environmental Impact Statement. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. BEEKEEPING: CITY CODE AMENDMENT. MacKenzie Walters presented the staff report on this item. Commissioner McGonagill asked for clarification on how the reduction in lot size was determined and the process of notifying neighbors. Commissioner Madsen asked if the City will maintain a list of all the houses with a permit. Commissioner Weick asked about the number of colonies allowed. Weick moved, Undestad seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt the attached ordinance amending Chapters 4, 5 and 20 of the City Code regarding beekeeping. All voted in favor except for Commissioner McGonagill who opposed and the motion carried with a vote of 5 to 1. Planning Commission Summary – June 5, 2018 3 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Madsen noted the verbatim and summary Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated May 15, 2018 as presented. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS. None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Kate Aanenson provided an update on future Planning Commission agenda items. Commissioner Tietz asked for updates on the Comprehensive Plan and the status of the Avienda grading plan. Commissioner Undestad moved to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Nann Opheim CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING JUNE 5, 2018 Chairman Aller called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Andrew Aller, Mark Undestad, Steve Weick, Nancy Madsen, John Tietz, and Michael McGonagill MEMBERS ABSENT: Mark Randall STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; and MacKenzie Walters, Planner PUBLIC PRESENT: Richard Hamblin 340 Sinner Circle Tom Braman 8040 Stevens, Bloomington PUBLIC HEARING: 1110 LAKE SUSAN DRIVE: LOT COVER VARIANCE. Walters: Alright this is Planning Case 2018-07. As mentioned if appealed this would go before the City Council on June 25th. The applicant Mark A. and Rebecca L. Erickson are requesting a 3 percent lot cover variance for the construction of a 144 square foot storage shed on their property. The property is located at 1110 Lake Susan Drive. This area is zoned planned unit development residential. Has a minimum of 11,200 square foot lot areas which have 80 foot minimum lot width, 30 foot front and rear setbacks, 10 foot side setbacks and the district is limited to 25 percent lot coverage. The current conditions for the property are, it has an 11,263 square foot lot which has a 76 and change foot lot width. Currently it has a non-conforming 26.8 percent lot cover but it does meet all the district setbacks. The applicant is proposing constructing a 12 foot by 12 foot, so 144 square foot storage shed in the rear of the property. This would increase the lot coverage from 3,013 square feet to 3,157 square feet for a 28 percent so because it does have the existing legal non-conforming when we do the variance we give it for both the non-conforming and the addition. The justification is this is one of the smallest lots in the subdivision. Within the subdivision the largest I could find was 150 square feet and then there are about 10 that are around this 11,200 square foot size. The applicant has noted that about 75 percent of the lots within their subdivision would be entitled to this lot cover under ordinance. The lot is a little substandard in that it does not meet the PUD’s minimum lot width and the applicant does not feel that the additional 144 square feet of lot cover will significantly impact either the neighborhood stormwater or aesthetics and it will provide needed storage for lawn care items and other things that help them comply with the City’s outdoor storage ordinance. Staff looked it over. We believe that the 25 percent lot cover limit is appropriate for Chanhassen Planning Commission – June 5, 2018 2 the development. However we do concur with the applicant. Most of the properties within this are well over the .26 acres so that 11,200 square feet. The total amount of hard cover they are proposing for the property as well as the use is both reasonable, and again this would be allowed on most of the other properties within the districts. The Water Resources Coordinator has added a memo which I attached to the report. It was her determination that on a development level as long as the total lot cover remains under 25 percent it shouldn’t negatively impact the stormwater maintenance in the area and staff does not believe that the proposed shed would alter the character of the neighborhood and so here I did just kind of put in the regional context for the Chanhassen Hills subdivision. The Lake Susan Hills Preserve is here. Lake Susan and the shoreland are up here and there’s quite a bit of green space in here and then Bluff Creek is southeast past Lyman Boulevard. If you have any questions I’d be happy to take them at this time. Aller: Does anybody have any questions based on the report? McGonagill: I just have one MacKenzie and it’s more background. Could you enlighten me where the 25 percent came from. I mean the science behind it because I’m, being new to the commission and it would help with that, thank you. Walters: Yeah 25 percent was largely determined, well it’s these, it’s the bookmark we use for applying the stormwater management is my understanding. If you have. Aanenson: Sure, maybe I’ll try to answer that one. So in the 80’s when all the subdivisions came in they had to be PUD’s so the 30 percent was a change. When they came in at that time they were 25 percent so all subdivisions had to come in as PUD’s and the lots, widths are a lot different today than they were put in place then so in some of these older neighborhoods they are much more restrictive and that’s true kind of around City Hall here too where there’s the little bit smaller lots. McGonagill: Was there historical scientific studies that drove the 25 percent? You know as opposed to 22 or 28. I mean just, it was just a number that. Aanenson: Just a standard. McGonagill: Okay, thanks. Madsen: MacKenzie did you know if there’s any opportunity in that lot that they could take action to reduce the lot coverage? I don’t know if pervious pavers are an option. I don’t know. There’s a mention of rock and is there plastic underneath? Is there anything that the homeowner could do? Walters: Yeah looking over that property, one of the reasons why staff is recommending approval is because this isn’t a case where they’ve built a ton accessory uses. You know the rear Chanhassen Planning Commission – June 5, 2018 3 patio is I believe 6 by 8 feet. You know the sidewalk is not excessive. Arguably a little bit could maybe be shaved off the driveway but probably not enough to make up the difference. This isn’t a case where the applicant, you know had constructed a 300 square foot patio and is now trying to do something else and is unwilling to move that so that’s one of the things we looked at. In theory you know could the sidewalk or patio be replaced with pavers to create a little bit better stormwater infiltration? Potentially. Madsen: Thank you. Aller: Commissioner Weick. Weick: Just on page 4 of 7. The last paragraph. I just, is that a typo where it says lot sizes ranging from 150,000 square feet? Walters: It is not. So without going too deep into the weeds on the history of PUD’s, at the time this one created in the mid 80’s we didn’t have a PUD ordinance like we did now. It only dealt with average lot size and what we let developers do was average lot sizes throughout the entire development. In this case they appear to have front loaded several properties with very, very large lot sizes. Mostly those within the shoreland overlay near Lake Susan and then use that to get a lot of 11,000 to 12,000 smaller lot sizes but their total lot size average over the 174 unit subdivision ended up being like 14,900 and change but a lot of that was from having two or three very large lots. Weick: Thank you. Aller: Any additional questions? Okay. Hearing none we’ll have the applicant come forward if they’d like to make a presentation or discuss their project. Welcome sir. If you could state your name and address for the record that’d be great. Mark Erickson: Yeah, Mark Erickson, 1110 Lake Susan Drive, Chanhassen. Aller: Welcome sir. Mark Erickson: Thank you. Not sure what I can add to it. I did look at reducing the current lot coverage now and I was concerned that there is, well this is the way it was built back in ’93 so we haven’t changed anything of the coverage since then. Was concerned about that patio in the back. There’s a cement pad that’s right where the walkout comes. That might be a code type thing that you can’t walk out onto grass. It might have to be, really the only thing is the driveway and to get down to that 25 percent, the driveway would have to go down to 15 feet 11 inches wide and the one garage door is 16 feet wide so that’s kind. Aller: That makes sense. Chanhassen Planning Commission – June 5, 2018 4 Mark Erickson: Yeah there’s really nothing else to take away except the driveway and it’d get down to a two car. Aller: Can you talk about the project itself? The shed. The use for the shed. Mark Erickson: Yeah. Putting a shed in to use the third stall more efficiently. Right now I’ve got wheelbarrows and lawnmowers and like everybody usually would. If I could get that in there, I’ve got a boat that I have in the driveway in the summertime. I’d like to wheel that into that third stall and then that goes away in the wintertime and then I could have my daughter’s car in there in the winter too to keep it from, well just the snow and the frost and things like that. Little safer to take off when she drives away or well just when she leaves in, during the day in the wintertime. Less scraping things like that so just to use that stall actually for a car instead of stuff that people get all the time. That’s the main idea. Aller: Okay, any questions of Mr. Erickson? That’s it, thank you sir. Mark Erickson: Yep thank you. Aller: And we’ll open up the public hearing portion of this item so anyone wishing to come forward and speak either for or against the item before us can do so at this time. Seeing no one come forward I’m going to close the public hearing and open it up for discussion. Or action. Are you clearing your throat? Undestad: No I’m fine with it. Aller: Yeah I hear reasonable use. I see where it’s the smallest lot so it’s one of those lots that we look for dealing with variances that it’s unique in nature. It’s certainly unique to this property as compared to the other units and lots. Even as to the PUD and it’s already a non- conforming use but it’s not excessive and again as far as the way I try to look at these things, I want to make sure that the people get the value out of their property so the resident can use the property the way it was intended and make it’s highest and best use and it sounds like that’s what it’s being used for in this case so. Additional comments. Questions. Motions. Weick: I’ll just make a. Aller: Commissioner Weick. Weick: My vote against. I would just say that hard cover’s a percent of lot and in this case we’re over. I think the relative size of the accessory structure, although it’s relatively small I think that’s subjective and so I don’t, I’ll be voting against only because I just, I don’t see anything that would indicate that, I mean from what I understand there’s 3 stalls in the garage. I just, I don’t see hardship and I don’t think relative lot size to the rest of the neighborhood is a sufficient hardship. That’s just respectfully my opinion. Chanhassen Planning Commission – June 5, 2018 5 Aller: Any additional comments? Questions. Mr. McGonagill. McGonagill: I guess I’d like to, yeah I don’t see an issue with it. I’d like to encourage the homeowner, if it does be approved to consider, and I was looking at the plot line it has like a 8 foot grade drop from front to back if I read the plot right. Encourage the homeowner, you know consider things like rain gardens and things like that just to help infiltration and help the water quality because that’s really what this is about and there are things, you know you know the lot better than I do but as I looked at it I said well maybe you could do something like that. Just as a comment or suggestion to you. Aller: Action, comments? I’ll invite a motion. Undestad: I’ll make a motion. Aller: Commissioner Undestad. Undestad: Alright, the Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 3 percent lot coverage variance subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision. Aller: I have a motion. Do I have a second? McGonagill: I’ll second it. Aller: Having a motion and a second, any further discussion? Undestad moved, McGonagill seconded that the Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 3 percent lot coverage variance subject to the following conditions and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision: 1. The applicant must apply for and receive a zoning permit. 2. Lot coverage may not exceed 3,157 square feet. All voted in favor, except for Commissioner Weick who opposed, and the motion carried with a vote of 5 to 1. Aller: The motion carries 5 to 1. Moving onto item 2. PUBLIC HEARING: 340 SINNEN CIRCLE: LOT COVER VARIANCE. Chanhassen Planning Commission – June 5, 2018 6 Walters: Alright this is Planning Case 2018-9. It’s the applicant Richard Hamblin for a 5 foot front yard setback variance for the construction of a garage expansion. So the property is 340 Sinnen Circle. This is zoned planned unit development residential. Has a 7,500 square foot lot area. This, the Hidden Valley PUD has a 25 foot front yard setback except for properties located on cul-de-sac which are held to a 30 foot front yard setback. There’s a 30 foot rear yard setback and 10 foot side yard setbacks. This planned unit development allows up to 30 percent lot coverage and restricts that to 25 percent within the shoreland overlay district. The current conditions on the property are an 8,500 square foot lot. It has a 61.4 foot width at setback. It currently has 27.1 percent lot coverage and meets the 30 foot front yard setback as well as the 30 foot rear and 10 foot side setbacks. The applicant is proposing extending the front of the garage 5 feet forward to create an additional 112 square feet of storage space. The additional storage space would allow for the indoor storage of 3 cars. I believe the plan is to knock out a wall to the shop to let him double park here and the main justification is that you know the 3 car storage will allow them to not store cars in the driveway. Improve curb appeal. They’ve noted as I mentioned that the Hidden Valley PUD allows 25 foot setbacks for properties not located on cul- de-sacs and that the proposed expansion will still meet the 10 foot side yard setbacks and it would not exceed the 30 percent lot coverage. The way the properties are configured the expansion 5 feet forward would not in any way impact the view of the neighboring properties. Staff looked over it and I did an assessment of the 69 houses in that section. 69 of the houses in that PUD. Approximately half of the properties within the subdivisions have front yard setbacks between 30 and 25 feet. It is pretty consistent that those on the bulb of the cul-de-sac are held to the 30 foot setback. I reviewed the notes from the original planned unit development and it appears to me that the primary concern was having the 30 foot setback in order to maintain the 10 foot side yard setback. The development had been initially proposed with alternating 10 and 5 foot side yard setbacks and that had been amended to require the 10 feet. So staff believes that since the applicant’s proposal will maintain the 10 foot side yard setbacks, won’t alter the view scape and since about half the properties in the neighborhood are held to the 25 foot setback standard it’s in line with the intent of the PUD ordinance and would not negatively impact surrounding properties or the aesthetics of the neighborhood. I’d be happy to take any questions at this time. Aller: Any questions of staff at this time after the presentation? Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: MacKenzie there’s a table in the back and it indicates that the garage addition is 15 square feet. Is that because the, that part of the driveway, does it…with the driveway? Walters: Yes. So I believe you’re referring to the hard cover change that would be involved in it, yep. So because it’s mostly being built over the existing driveway and the sidewalk, the only new lot cover is going to be this little sliver down in here that’s clear of the driveway. And again even with that bump up he’s going to be under the 30 percent he’s allowed under the ordinance. Madsen: Okay so that’s why you only use 15 for the garage addition rather than the 112 square feet. Chanhassen Planning Commission – June 5, 2018 7 Walters: Yep. Madsen: Okay, thank you. Aller: Any additional questions? Hearing none we’ll invite the applicant up. If you could state your name and address for the record please. Richard Hamblin: Yes, Richard Hamblin, 340 Sinnen Circle here in Chanhassen. Aller: Welcome Mr. Hamblin. Richard Hamblin: Hi. He had mentioned the intent was to knock out a wall to my workshop area there. There is no wall between the garage and that currently so I measured it and I currently have to, I’ve got 3 cars so I currently have to leave one in the driveway. If I could add 5 more feet there would be room on the left side to put nose to tail so I’d have two on one side and one of the other so I could get all 3 in there so that would help as far as the way it looks. As far as the clutter of the neighborhood and so forth so I think it would be a good deal. And plus I wouldn’t have to scrape windows like we mentioned earlier so that’d be nice too. As far as I know I’m not encroaching in anybody’s space. I’m not encroaching in anybody’s views or detracting from anybody’s property values or the aesthetics of their homes and I’ve checked with my neighbors and nobody has an issue. They all said yeah, fine. Go for it. Looks fine. And from the street if you were looking right at it, after the addition goes on you wouldn’t tell the difference. And one more thing I wanted to point out is, all the documentation says the front yard setback is 30 feet. The driveway from the curb to the front door is 50 feet. Now I guess there’s some other thing with lots that I don’t understand but the driveway is 50 feet long so if I add 5 feet I’m still 45 feet from the street. So I just wanted to make everybody aware of that. Aller: Great thank you. Do you want to for the record just to go ahead and address that issue? Walters: Just to clarify. That cul-de-sac was platted and there’s 20 feet of public right-of-way between the curb and then the start of the applicant’s property line so that’s where that discrepancy comes from. Aller: Any questions of the applicant at this point? Seeing none thank you. Richard Hamblin: Okay. Aller: I’ll open up the public hearing portion of this item. Any individual wishing to speak either for or against this request can do so at this time. Seeing no one come forward I will close the public hearing. Open it up for discussion or action by the commissioners. Commissioner Weick. Chanhassen Planning Commission – June 5, 2018 8 Weick: Yeah I was just going to say for me it really just comes down to it’s right into the variance on the setback and on page 4 of 6 in the first paragraph the analysis, I think it’s a pretty nice job by MacKenzie to say the original intent of the increased setbacks for properties on cul- de-sacs was to insure sufficient lot width at building setback and since this is already, this is going to meet post construction, it’s going to still meet that lot width requirement to me makes this a valid, a valid request and a valid variance. I’d be approving it. Aller: Great. And I am looking at it that the coverage is not an issue in this matter so that works as well and I think it sounds like it should have been marketed as a two car garage with a bonus room but we might have a 3 car garage now. Tietz: Chairman Aller? Aller: Commissioner Tietz. Tietz: Just a question and kind of point of clarification for MacKenzie. The diagram that you show shows the driveway going right straight up to the entrance to the garage yet on site and in the image that you have on page 4 it appears that the driveway is wider to accommodate the width of 3 cars in parking. Was that taken into consideration in your evaluation? Walters: Yeah I agree that it seems to be a little wider than it is in the diagram. I requested that the applicant field measure the driveway width and submit those numbers. While I did not go out and personally you know verify. I believe from looking at the aerials and rough calculating it that the numbers he submitted for the lot coverage are correct. And that’s something that he’ll have to demonstrate and he does still have some flexibility even if it’s a little above because we aren’t granting a variance for lot coverage. Tietz: Thank you. Aller: Additional questions or comments. I’ll invite a motion at this time. Madsen: I’ll make a motion. Aller: Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 5 foot front yard setback variance subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decisions. Aller: I have a valid motion. Do I have a second? Undestad: Second. Chanhassen Planning Commission – June 5, 2018 9 Aller: Having a motion and a second. Any further discussion or comment? Madsen moved, Undestad seconded that the Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 5 foot front yard setback variance subject to the following conditions and adopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decisions: 1. The applicant must apply for and receive a building permit. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. Aller: Motion carries. And we’ll move onto item number 3 regarding the Audubon and Lyman CUP transmission line. PUBLIC HEARING: TRANSMISSION LINE: AUDUBON AND LYMAN CUP. Aanenson: That’s mine. Thank you Chairman, members of the Planning Commission. This is an application by Xcel Energy. We do require a conditional use permit for certain wattage of electricity in excess so this is a conditional use. Want to go to the next page. So this will also go to the Planning Commission regardless of how you vote on this tonight. So the location is south of the intersection of Audubon Road and Lyman Boulevard. You can see the larger area on the left and the portion in Chanhassen is a little over 700 feet. That is that area in red that is covered by the line itself. Can you go to the next slide. So the proposed transmission line consists of constructing approximately yeah, 1.5 mile long, double circuit, 115 voltage, kilovolts, am I saying that right? There you go. Transmission line and suspended over 18 overhead structures. Two of those would be within Chanhassen so because of the voltage that is on there does require a conditional use. Because this is a larger project this does require, as the applicant has done, the environmental assessment document so there was hearings held on that and some Chanhassen residents did attend that so they’ve been informed of the process. Again we’re, we partnered with Chaska on this and let them be the LGU. The government authority because of a majority of that is within Chanhassen. So they are following that. The process for the closing of the, I think there’s 10 more days, working days after the project to take additional comments. Am I right on that? Audience: Correct. Aanenson: Yeah about 10 more days so people still have the right to comment on that but this is a conditional use will then catch up to that by the time we get through. So with that we did the conditional use permit findings. Again because of the transmission lines there it’s the upgrade, the staff felt it met the findings that are required for the conditional use permit. So we are recommending approval. Again the poles will be not colored. Consistent with what’s out there. Sometimes our poles, if you look on Highway 5 they’re the blue. These will be the kind of the more rustic look that’s out there but with that Sharmeen Al-Jaff who worked on this project was Chanhassen Planning Commission – June 5, 2018 10 actually at the neighborhood meeting and was able to talk to Chanhassen residents that were there so we are recommending approval of the conditional use permit and then also the Findings of Fact and Decision so with that I’d be happy to answer any questions that you may have. Also with tonight is two representatives of Xcel, Brian Sullivan and Gene Kotz are here to answer any questions that you may have too. Aller: Great, thank you. So again this is one of those great reports and it’s also involves cross communication and cooperation with other entities which is always helpful. Our portion here is very small but in looking at it it appears that the report has hit all the required findings. Are there any, it looks like that they’re all met. Are there anywhere you would consider them to be close and should be examined? Aanenson: No. Aller: Any other questions of staff? Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: Kate it appears that this transmission line is in a commercial area. Aanenson: Correct. Madsen: And there’s no neighborhoods directly touching it. Aanenson: That’s correct. If you can go back to that one map. So we’re on the industrial park there so it kind of, it does go by the high school but it’s on the other side of the street of the high school. As you know in front of the high school there is a transmission station there. The Chaska transmission station and then it does follow down into Chaska’s industrial park but yes, it’s, it’s either institutional or industrial. Madsen: So if, were there any notices sent out to any neighborhoods? Aanenson: Yeah it was all within 500 feet. Madsen: Just the standard 500 feet that we normally do. Aanenson: Yeah I’ll let the applicant from Xcel talk about how big their notice was and that may have been that red map that showed how big. I’ll let them answer how far their notices went out. Madsen: Okay thank you. Aller: Great. Based on that question are there any other questions? Hearing none we’ll invite the applicant to come forward and make their presentation. Perhaps you can hit that issue right off the bat after you state your names and addresses and representational capacities. Chanhassen Planning Commission – June 5, 2018 11 Brian Sullivan: Yeah this is Brian Sullivan with Xcel Energy and I have Gene Kotz here also and Tom Braman is with Westwood Engineering. He’s the one that actually pulled the report together and did all the work so maybe we should give him some… Aller: So you hide him in the back and you get to speak. Brian Sullivan: Yeah exactly. You know we just want to claim all the fame and glory I can here. Not really but, so on the notices I believe we sent out to 500 feet within the route there and part of the route, part of the reasoning for the route was we wanted to stay away from residential areas as much as possible and so the route was on the side of Lyman Boulevard that was on, that goes up to the railroad tracks and it’s on the south side of the railroad tracks until we hop over into, hop over the railroad tracks at Lyman at the light there and then into the new substation there so we’re trying to be mindful of the neighborhood and the community and trying to minimize the impacts to everybody around so that’s part of what that route was about there. There were other considerations that we looked at but this seemed to be the least intrusive route on that. The transmission line is requested by the City of Chaska. We’re the wholesale provider to the City and so as that we’re required to provide them with electricity and we’ve been working with the City of Chaska. The City of Chanhassen and Chaska have been talking back and forth, back and forth, back and forth and so we feel like we’ve had some pretty good communications between all the groups and you know with that I guess I’d leave it open to any questions you might have. Aller: I know the answer but this is for the general public who are watching and of course they should also know that these reports are again on our website so that you can review these and follow the item to final action with the City Council but were other sites and routes examined and considered? Brian Sullivan: Yeah we looked at, we looked at 3 or 4 other routes. One was to, well and some of them it’s all kind of intuitive. We looked at going down Audubon towards the lake and then following the lake across or trying to sneak through the neighborhood there and that caused some issues with just having, the transmission line against the lake isn’t, just didn’t seem like a good use of that there. Not only the environmental issues but the view shed issues there for that. We looked at going on the other side of Lyman but, and Gene can talk about the engineering issues but there’s a lot of engineering issues to get around the substation and we got to tap into the line way down in the hollow down there. Down in the wetland area there’s difficulty getting down there and all that and then plus we’re going across school property and we’ve learned in the past that when we start to cross school properties we start to get a lot of people come in and to voice opposition to that. And the other option was to follow the railroad tracks. I’m losing my sense of direction. I guess that’d be on the north and east and tap in the line there but then again we are flying over either the top of the school property or flying through the back yards of neighbors and those seemed less reasonable also. Chanhassen Planning Commission – June 5, 2018 12 Aller: Sounds like you also had some communication with the public and open houses. How did those discussions go? Brian Sullivan: The open houses we had, we’ve had an open house where we invited everybody in and we had 3 or 4. We didn’t have a lot of people, a lot of people showed up. Mr. Degler showed up and some of the other residents in the area showed up and some were there just out of interest to see what was going on and some people were concerned about the location of it but hopefully we answered the questions as best we can so it wasn’t, it wasn’t pitchforks and torches so. So anyway that’s, it went fairly well. Aller: Any additional questions? Mr. McGonagill. McGonagill: So on the, any other spurs or extensions planned off of this line to go to other substations or growth or is this just tying two nodes together and this is it? Gene Kotz: This is a circuit that is called an in and out capture where, Mr. McGonagill? McGonagill: Yes. Gene Kotz: Is that correct? Yeah it’s an in and out tap where it goes out. It ends back where it started because it has to be, it’s a looped type of configuration to where it just doesn’t go out and wait for somebody to connect and go somewhere else. It’s only to that point and back so there’s no expansion for the future. McGonagill: Will there be any additional wires run to up the load do you think or is it just this? Gene Kotz: No. McGonagill: I mean this is all you’ll ever do is a 115 KV and that’s it. Gene Kotz: Correct. We could not ever expand that anyway because it would require, if we went higher in voltage it would require a much larger permitting process as well as we’d have to get a larger easement width so all properties would be affected which, that’s a no start so we can’t do that. McGonagill: Okay. Gene Kotz: But this will stay at 115 KV. McGonagill: And that’s it. Just this is the route and this is the route, okay thank you. Aller: Additional comments or questions? Thank you gentlemen. Chanhassen Planning Commission – June 5, 2018 13 Brian Sullivan: Thank you. Aller: At this point in time we’ll open up the public hearing portion of this item. Any individual wishing to speak either for or against the item before us can do so at this time. Seeing no one come up we will close the public hearing. Open it up for discussion and/or motion. Another complete report. Undestad: Then I will make a motion. Aller: Commissioner Undestad. Undestad: That the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the conditional use permit to allow a transmission line to be located south of the intersection of Audubon and Lyman Boulevard, Planning Case 18-08 subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision. Aller: I have a motion. Do I have a second? Tietz: Second. Aller: Having a motion and a second, any further discussion or comment? Undestad moved, Tietz seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit to allow a transmission line to be located south of the intersection of Audubon Road and Lyman Boulevard as shown in the attached Exhibit A, Planning Case 18-08, and subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval of the Conditional Use Permit is contingent upon final approval of the EA and a resolution declaring no need for an Environmental Impact Statement. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. Aller: Motion carries. Aanenson: Chairman just wanted to, because we don’t do these too often I just want to remind everybody, we do have high tension power lines that run along Highway 5 that’s serving the city and those have been upgraded over time and also we are serviced by two electrical districts. Xcel’s on the north side and on the southern end Minnesota Valley so we have, we did a substation down by Gedney Pickles where we were the LGU on that one. I don’t know if anybody remembers that but that was Sharmeen worked on that one too but that also services going from the south so we do some experience and Sharmeen’s very knowledgeable and worked with Xcel on this one so I think we got all of our questions answered ahead of time but I appreciate the questions that you asked so make sure those got on the public record so thank you. Chanhassen Planning Commission – June 5, 2018 14 Aller: Okay thank you. Okay and again those individuals wishing to follow this item to final action, this is set for June 25th which is a Monday two weeks hence. And we’ll move onto old business. BEEKEEPING: CITY CODE AMENDMENT. Walters: Alright so this first came before the Planning Commission during a public hearing on May 15th. It was tabled and staff was directed to investigate allowing on smaller lots and to investigate the possibility of requiring a permit and including a neighbor notification component to that permit. So this is staff’s revisions of the initial proposed ordinance. This is a little bit more on the public hearing. Some of the questions that had been asked by the Planning Commission was impact to bees on pure cities. I did a little detective work. Not as much as I would have liked in terms of answers but Carver and Chaska allow without any regulations so long as they’re not a nuisance. Victoria and Waconia are agricultural only for surrounding cities. Edina has an ordinance that’s very similar to what you’re considering today. Unfortunately their animal control officer was not in when I called so I don’t know if they’ve had any complaints or difficulties with the smaller lot size. I was able to talk to the folks over in Shorewood. They allow up to 4 hives on lots without concern for lot size. The planner there was not aware of any complaints although she did mention they require 75 percent of the neighbors to consent so that would weed out a lot of potential concerns on that front. But she said they hadn’t been contacted with any concerns and they allow them on any size lot. So the other two points we mentioned was using the permit as a way to guarantee that neighbors are notified and for the City to verify that potential beekeepers have been trained. To the best of my ability to find out there isn’t any industry agreed upon minimum lot size that you need for bees. You know as I mentioned they’re allowed in urban environments with much smaller lots than we’re contemplating here and I couldn’t find significant reports of problems with that. So just to kind of summarize the public comments we heard during the public hearing. The general was support for the ordinance but again it was felt that the half acre was unnecessarily restrictive. Individuals had indicated they were willing to go through a permitting process especially if it was coupled with allowing smaller lot sizes and it was also observed that back yard beekeeping should not be considered or regulated like the agricultural practice because these scales are different. Beyond that this is essentially the same ordinance that was brought before you. The main changes are as mentioned. We moved from the half acre minimum to a third acre and then staff is proposing requiring a one time permit with a $25 fee and we would use that to verify that the applicant had contacted their neighbors. That they had received 16 hours of training. Had the minimum lot size or placing the colonies within the required 25 foot setbacks and were meeting the density requirements that we’d be establishing. This is a recap of what I just said. With that I’ll take any questions you may have. Aller: Any questions of MacKenzie at this point? Tietz: Good update. Chanhassen Planning Commission – June 5, 2018 15 Walters: Thank you. McGonagill: As always MacKenzie I’ve got some. Aller: Commissioner McGonagill. McGonagill: I’ve got, if it’s okay I have four. Just go through them if that’s okay. One is just on the, you went down from a half acre to a third. Just due to the public comment is that why you went down? Walters: Largely due to that. The reason why we settled on a third acre is because most of the third acre properties can accommodate the 25 foot setback which we do feel is important to guarantee the bees are flying high enough. And the third acre also corresponds roughly to the 15,000 square foot which is the base minimum lot size for our RSF district so we felt that was a pretty equitable cut off point. When you get into our smaller lots, a lot of them would struggle to meet the 25 foot setback and there is still a little bit of discomfort with the idea of putting them in the very small districts. Townhouse, you know, so that’s the reason why we dropped to the third. McGonagill: Okay thanks. The next three are really about process and it’s really with the neighbors. How we imagine this working and so I’m just going to kind of go through some, a couple, three questions and you can say kind of if this would work. They inform their neighbors but let’s say a neighbor doesn’t want this, what’s the process they go through? Can they go through anything? I mean the way I read this is somebody wants to do this, it says I’ve informed them but it’s not, if the neighbor objects do you follow what I’m asking? Walters: Yep. The way it’s written they’re required to have a conversation with their neighbor and inform them of what they’re intending to do but we are not giving the neighbor veto power over their ability to have bees. If the individual was keeping bees in a way that constituted a nuisance then the City would take action to a complaint and would revoke the permit and we put provisions in there to allow us to do that. However if they inform their neighbor and if they’re being a responsible beekeeper and following every aspect of the ordinance, if the bees are not serving as a nuisance the bees would be there. McGonagill: So a follow up with that particular question. You did not choose to go with the 75 percent approval level like you mentioned Edina has. Why was that? Walters: I suppose some of it is philosophical preference. I become somewhat uncomfortable with the idea of somebody else being able to veto another person’s property rights. I think another potential issue you have there is if you require neighbor consent what do I do if my neighbor who didn’t care for 20 years moves away and a new couple moves in strenuously objects. Do I then revoke the bee permit because they no longer have neighbor approval so. Chanhassen Planning Commission – June 5, 2018 16 McGonagill: In fact that was one of my questions. My last question is how does this work when let’s say, let’s just jump to that question. How would it work if that did occur? House sells next door. They happen to have a child for example that’s allergic and they’re strongly opposed to beekeeping. What is the process that new neighbor can, maybe if they move in in the winter and don’t even know there’s bees there. You know I mean they just, how does that work for that neighbor to be sure they have a voice let’s say? Walters: There is not as currently written a provision that would allow them to take action to remove the bees as long as the bees were being kept within the bounds of the ordinance. At a certain point one would hope people would be mindful and sympathetic and respectful and work with each other to minimize those issues. But yeah it’s difficult to create an equitable system. McGonagill: If the bees become a nuisance, this is my last question. If the bees become a nuisance what’s the process? It’s a perceived nuisance. You know someone doesn’t like them. Maybe they’ve gotten stung or someone says I don’t want them anymore. What is the process the neighbor can follow to raise the awareness with the City, how does that work? Walters: The same as any other code enforcement. Individuals call, well me daily to be honest with you know my neighbor’s doing this. I don’t believe it’s permitted by the zoning code. We do an inspection. That’s part of the permit process is that we’re given the power to inspect. We’d observe the conditions with the hive. The reports. We did structure the ordinance in such a way that even compliance with it is not a defacto defense against it being found a nuisance so if we go out there and there are lots of bees all over the neighbor’s property and it’s reasonable in our opinion that yes this is a nuisance. Yes this is not as it should be, we would then have the authority to revoke the permit. McGonagill: And it’d be by staff. Wouldn’t have to come to the Planning Commission or anybody like that. Walters: It would be a staff decision. Under city ordinance any staff determination could be appealed to the City Council so if you know I found Director Aanenson’s bees to be a nuisance and she felt I was as staff wrong she could appeal to the City Council and they would review the matter. Aanenson: And I would say that sometimes too you have neighborhood disputes over something other and it becomes, you know now your dog’s bothering me so we deal with these all the time so really the nuisance is the best way to do it. We may make the interpretation of a nuisance. It gives an opportunity for someone to appeal it and give you know factual data so we think the nuisance is the best way to go. When you’re buying a home you don’t know a lot of things about the property and how it’s being used next door so we think if they’re being respectful and following the standards that are placed that it should be doable. Chanhassen Planning Commission – June 5, 2018 17 McGonagill: So that’s how they would handle it if there was a child, an allergic child they would just know that and work through the process? Aanenson: Well they could call and say you know as long as the bees aren’t bothering but they could certainly let us know that they want to make sure it’s being watched but yeah, the reason we built it that way is, it’s a time issue too. We’re not going to drive around every year and check them all. You know it’s how we handle a lot of things. On complaints. On outdoor storage and the like. It’s complaint based. McGonagill: Thank you. Thank you Mr. Chairman. That’s my questions. Aller: Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: When someone applies for a permit and they get the permit, will you maintain a list of all the houses with a permit? So let’s say a family wants to move in and a member of the family has a severe allergy, you could at least look and say these are the people who have applied for a permit in the past. Walters: Yep we keep records of everything. Madsen: Okay. So they could avoid it you know if they check with you. Walters: Yep. Madsen: Okay thank you. Aller: Additional questions, comments, concerns. Aanenson: Let me just follow up with that question too. I think what we would do too is just kind of track, and we could give you a report back. You know how many we’ve got. You know just kind of, just monitor it just so you could see. You know in the first years what the response rate is and how many we have. McGonagill: That’d be good. Weick: Is there a colony limit? I’m sorry, I’m missing that. Walters: Yep there is. I buried it in the ordinance. I believe we are proposing 2 colonies for properties under 1 acre. I believe we do 4 colonies for 1 acre to 2 ½ acres. And then we do 8 colonies for 2 ½ to 10 acres and no limit for 10 acres or higher because at that point it could very well be agricultural land. Chanhassen Planning Commission – June 5, 2018 18 Aller: Alright. Any additional questions? Comments. We don’t need to have a public hearing. We’ve already had one which was quite extensive. In fact one of the issues that I remember was, one of the presenters during the public hearing the last time who I thought was very knowledgeable on the subject was talking about the fact that you could have a number of bees on the property. It seemed like it would be satisfactory at that point based, and so I think this limitation is certainly reasonable to have as a, almost as a prophylactic protector in making sure that we don’t over do it. Weick: I mean I’m in general, I would support even more colonies. I would support smaller lot sizes but I appreciate the hours of work that have been put into this so I’m totally in favor of the way… Aanenson: Well I think what we’d like to do is start and see how it goes. Weick: Right. Aanenson: Then if things are working well in a couple years we could re-examine it and see how it’s working so. Weick: Yeah, I think we’ve gotten to a point where we can at least vote on something. Aller: That being said. Weick: I’d love to. Aller: I’ll entertain a motion. Weick: If there’s no other comment. I don’t want to cut off anybody. Aller: Any additional comments? Hearing none. Weick: The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopts the attached ordinance amending Chapters 4, 5, and 20 of the Chanhassen city code concerning beekeeping. Aller: I have a motion. Do I have a second? Undestad: Second. Aller: Having a motion and a second, any further discussion? Weick moved, Undestad seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt the attached ordinance amending Chapters 4, 5 and 20 of the City Chanhassen Planning Commission – June 5, 2018 19 Code regarding beekeeping. All voted in favor except for Commissioner McGonagill who opposed and the motion carried with a vote of 5 to 1. Aller: The motion carries 5 to 1. And then I don’t have but will this be forwarded on the 25th? Aanenson: The 25th yes so everybody’s tracking. Aller: So this item would also go before the, at the City Council on Monday, June 25th at their next June meeting. So those individuals wishing to follow that please take a look at the website and you can see the actual reports and follow along as they discuss the item on that date or come on down and have a visit. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Madsen noted the verbatim and summary Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated May 15, 2018 as presented. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS. None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Aller: We’ll move onto administrative presentations. City Council action updates. Aanenson: The Planning Commission hasn’t had much on for the City Council so there are no updates for that but I do want to kind of go through a schedule. We do have a subdivision variance which means that they’re subdividing a piece of property and there’s a deficiency so the subdivision variance is a little bit different than our typical variance standards so you’ll see that. That’s the only thing we have on for the June 19th. We may put some other discussion ones on there but I’ll let you know. July 3rd we typically do not have a meeting because it falls right before the 4th of July so whenever that meeting falls it’s typically people are traveling. It’s hard to get a quorum so we will not have a meeting then. But July 17th we are still planning on having the Comprehensive Plan public hearing and Avienda PUD. I’m not sure that will be on that one or later. We’re also working for a site plan review for Control Concepts and that’s actually in the park where Life Time Fitness is so that’s going on. And then there may be another large residential property that we might do a concept review on too so if I see that that application comes in so all of a sudden we’ve got a few things coming in here the next little bit. We’re working on some other smaller subdivisions. Those are almost trickier than some of the larger ones. Little bit more complex when you’re doing infill developments so we’ll keep you posted of that. You can see some of those up above. We’ve talked about the Beehive expansion. That would be that third phase so that’s an idea but some of these other subdivisions. You may get a chance to see those others and that, that’s all I had. Oh maybe just give you an update on what’s going on. The Venue should be ready to start maybe next Monday of tearing down that building. The apartment building so if you had gone by Mission Hills, that’s under construction. They had a ground breaking out there so that’s underway, moving a lot of dirt out there. Someone’s working, I think I mentioned on Powers Ridge. That last building out there and the apartments Chanhassen Planning Commission – June 5, 2018 20 off of Powers Boulevard. Don’t know much yet when Panera will start but they should be ready to go. Taking down the old hotel there yep, and so yeah some changes going on. And everybody’s asking me what’s going to Applebee’s. Applebee’s closed. Do not know so be a surprise I guess so yeah things are going on. On in town so that’s all I had Chairman. Aller: Thank you. Commissioner Tietz. Tietz: Yeah I’d like to, Kate I have a couple questions or MacKenzie, just an update. There is some land use changes proposed sometime back. Aanenson: Yes. Tietz: That’d be part of the comp plan. What’s the status of that? Will we see that again? Aanenson: Yes you will. Yep. So we’ll, I’m actually walking one of the properties tomorrow with Jill, the Forester and Park and Rec Director. Tietz: That’s down at, which one? Aanenson: Off of Powers Boulevard. Tietz: Yeah. Aanenson: There’s another off of 101. We’ll probably still have our same recommendation on the 101. Just in case you didn’t hear we got money in the bonding bill for, we talked a little bit about that for the bottom of 101 so they’re working on getting that upgraded but we have a lot of stuff between, one of the things that you talked about I believe Commissioner Tietz was that we work on the infill before we continue to go down so we believe there’s enough development here for the next 5, 7, 10 years. Someone can always ask for a land use amendment in the future but right now we feel that we’ve got enough in the current municipal service area so, because anything else beyond what we would do obviously we’d provide sewer and water with the construction of 101. The piping but we need another lift station to develop anything further south so we’ve got quite a bit of capacity left within the current MUSA area. Tietz: Good. Aanenson: But you will see those when we have the meeting on the 17th. Tietz: Okay. Aanenson: Yes in more detail. Tietz: But the position of staff remains consistent? Chanhassen Planning Commission – June 5, 2018 21 Aanenson: The same. Tietz: The same. Aanenson: Yep, yep, yep. Tietz: We’ll just hold on that because there was that. Aanenson: We’ll go through those in detail because I think there was… Tietz: Alright, that was part of the, that will be part of July? Aanenson: I think everything else except for one of the water resources, you’ll see a little bit more detail on the four different districts of what their expectations are for our plans to come together so you’ll see more detail on that but I think the rest of the housing study, all that has not really changed. We’ve changed the font and some of the graphics but, and we’ll go through that in summary but none of that has changed. I think the loose end was really the land use and then where we were with the water resources on the four different watershed districts combining to make sure we’re, and once we get done with that you’re going to see a lot of code amendments too for bringing our code in alignment and the tool for that is the zoning ordinance so we’ll see some changes on that. Tietz: Okay and then one other question. The grading plan for Avienda, what’s the status of that? Aanenson: Oh my gosh. Tietz: Sorry. Aanenson: No, I get asked that by the residents, it’s very frustrating. Paul just told me today that their application has been accepted by the watershed district. I just found that out this morning. Thank you for asking that question. So right now we have it scheduled to go to the City Council on June 25th for their grading permit. All things being completed so right now that’s when we believe we can have it on so we’re the closest we’ve been on that. And just to remind everybody with that application we will approve the PUD as was preliminary platted. They’re going to come back and do a PUD amendment and that’s what I have a place holder. They’re working through changes on some of the designs. Some of the uses have changed. We showed this to the City Council. There’ll be an increase in the number of residential units and they’re working with some other people looking at some of the design changes which I think you will find good. Trying to reduce some of those large parking lots. Pushing the buildings closer to, you know so it’s more walkable so those will be the PUD changes and you’ll see those and we reworked the sign ordinance. We’ve got that all figured out now so the Planning Chanhassen Planning Commission – June 5, 2018 22 Commission will also comment on that too so you will see a more formalized, detailed presentation on all the changes but you will have to make a recommendation to the City Council on that. The grading permit will just be on consent with the preliminary plat as you approved it but it’s not their intent to go forward but they need to approve the PUD to get the right-of-way approved so they’re just approving it in outlots with the right-of-way dedication, if that makes sense. Tietz: And the grading plan then dictates how stormwater’s going to be treated. Aanenson: Exactly. Tietz: So we should be comfortable that the stormwater will be satisfied with approval by council. Aanenson: Right and that was some of the wrinkles. Tietz: Yeah. Aanenson: You know as the buildings moved around where can they put temporary ponding and how’s that all going to work and that’s, there was just a lot of heavy lifting on the engineering there so. Tietz: Cool, thanks Kate. Aanenson: Yeah, you’re welcomed. Thanks for asking. Aller: Any other additional great questions for Kate? Alright hearing one I’ll entertain a motion to adjourn. Commissioner Undestad moved to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Nann Opheim CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 25, 2018 Subject Receive Park & Recreation Minutes dated May 22, 2018 Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.3. Prepared By Nann Opheim, City Recorder File No:  PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council receives the Park & Recreation minutes dated May 22, 2018.” Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. ATTACHMENTS: Summary Minutes Verbatim Minutes CHANHASSEN PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES MAY 22, 2018 Vice Chair Boettcher called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Cole Kelly, Rick Echternacht, Jim Boettcher, Meredith Petouvis, Karl Tsuchiya, Joe Scanlon, and Grant Schaeferle MEMBERS ABSENT: Steve Scharfenberg STAFF PRESENT: Todd Hoffman, Park and Rec Director; Jerry Ruegemer, Recreation Superintendent; Katie Matthews, Recreation Supervisor; and Adam Beer, Park Superintendent PUBLIC PRESENT: Kaili Palattao 8209 Narcissus Street Maggie Rothstein 8610 Apple Tree Lane Caden Pottebaum 2379 Jennifer Lane APPROVAL OF AGENDA: The agenda was approved with an information piece by Todd Hoffman regarding Control Concepts purchasing the lot next to Mamac System and will be completing the final phase of the trail segment connected with Chanhassen Nature Preserve. Therefore the CIP will have to be amended to move $90,000 from 2021 to 2018. PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: Jerry Ruegemer noted that the Memorial Day Ceremony will be held on Monday, May 28th at the Veteran’s Memorial. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. None. KEY FINANCIAL STRATEGY: PROPOSED PARKS REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE 2019-2023. Adam Beer presented the staff report on this item outlining a 5 year schedule for park amenities replacements. Vice Chair Boettcher asked for clarification of the tour on Tuesday, June 12th. Commissioner Petouvis asked about moving the Lake Ann Park project up ahead of a neighborhood park. Commissioner Echternacht pointed out an inconsistency in pricing. Commissioner Tsuchiya asked how the life expectancy of playground equipment being installed today compares to the equipment installed in the 1990’s. Park and Recreation Commission Summary – May 22, 2018 2 Kelly moved, Echternacht seconded that the Park and Recreation Commission recommends the City Council establish a park replacement fund and approve the 2019 to 2023 parks replacement schedule. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. INTRODUCTION OF 2018 KLEINBANK SUMMER CONCERT SERIES. Katie Matthews provided an overview of the Summer Concert Series sponsored by KleinBank. Vice Chair Boettcher asked for clarification on how the bands are selected. REPORTS: 2018 LAKE ANN PARK SUMMER PROGRAMS. Jerry Ruegemer presented the staff report on this item. 2018 ADULT SOFTBALL. Jerry Ruegemer presented the staff report on this item. 2018 SUMMER PROGRAMS. Katie Matthews presented the staff report on this item. COMMISSION MEMBER COMMITTEE REPORTS. None. COMMISSION MEMBER PRESENTATIONS. None. ADMINISTRATIVE PACKET. Vice Chairman Boettcher pointed out highlights from the items included in the administrative packet. Jerry Ruegemer presented a power point presentation of the lighting ceremony held at Lake Susan Park ballfield. Echternacht moved, Petouvis seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. The Park and Recreation Commission meeting was adjourned at 8:10 p.m. Submitted by Todd Hoffman Park and Rec Director Prepared by Nann Opheim CHANHASSEN PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MAY 22, 2018 Acting Chair Boettcher called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Cole Kelly, Rick Echternacht, Jim Boettcher, Meredith Petouvis, Karl Tsuchiya, Joe Scanlon, and Grant Schaeferle MEMBERS ABSENT: Steve Scharfenberg STAFF PRESENT: Todd Hoffman, Park and Rec Director; Jerry Ruegemer, Recreation Superintendent; Katie Matthews, Recreation Supervisor; and Adam Beer, Park Superintendent PUBLIC PRESENT: Kaili Palattao 8209 Narcissus Street Maggie Rothstein 8610 Apple Tree Lane Caden Pottebaum 2379 Jennifer Lane APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Boettcher: Any items need to add, delete, modify? Todd. Hoffman: Chair Boettcher one item I’d like to add is simply an information piece and I’ll distribute that now. Is the Control Concepts has contacted the City, their engineer and we’ll be meeting them Thursday this week. They have purchased the lot next to Mamac Systems out on Century Boulevard and this is a piece of trail that you’re familiar with. The Chanhassen Nature Preserve trail final phase and so now they will build this as a part of their project in 2018 which will require that during your CIP discussion you’ll need to move that $90,000 up from 2021 to 2018 concurrent when the project is going to be underway and completed. I talked to their engineer today and they anticipate that they’ll be done with the building and the trail by fall. So we’ll bring that back to your attention. Simply an information piece tonight. I’m not sure that you’ll have to add it to the agenda. Boettcher: Okay. You’ll bring it back in a couple months? Okay. Anything else? PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: Boettcher: Anything Todd, Jerry? Anything to announce public wise? Hoffman: Public notices Jerry, anything this week? Park and Recreation Commission – May 22, 2018 2 Ruegemer: Just Memorial Day ceremony is Monday, the 28th. Much of the program will be the same. The Legion being the emcees of the event and the City will be there with supporting cast and logistics and many of the other things to take care of so Chan-o-Laires will be singing again for that so 12:00 noon on Monday right here at the Veteran’s monument. Boettcher: Okay, good. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS: Boettcher: I see we have 3 high school students here. Getting extra credit I believe and hopefully if any of you would like to say anything, at the very least I’d like to say maybe you’ll like what you see tonight and you’ll be like our youth commission Schaeferle and apply to be on the commission next year. It’s great. It doesn’t pay that great but you have a good time. You get to learn about the City and parks and rec system so glad to have you here this evening. KEY FINANCIAL STRATEGY: PROPOSED PARKS REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE 2019-2023. Beer: Thank you Chair Boettcher and commissioners. Key Financial Strategy for 2018 is the proposed parks replacement schedule. So we put together, give you guys a bit of a background here. We have a power point to go through to kind of paint a better picture of what we’re proposing. Chanhassen Park and Recreation Department manages 30 community and neighborhood parks totaling 466 acres of property. Through the process of developing the parks and rec system plan it was determined that maintenance updates needed to be made to adequately serve the public the way we should be. A lot of our playgrounds, basketball courts, hockey rinks are starting to age significantly so we’re looking to find a funding source to maintain these and bring them back up to the service level that’s going to satisfy the needs of the public. So I have put together a power point and what I did was broke down a 5 year replacement schedule starting with a lot of the oldest amenities that need to be addressed first. So I got, we’ll kind of go through this but what I did was kind of broke down 2019 and 2020 in a little more greater detail. So getting started. Herman Field Park. The playground was installed in 1992. So assuming we get a funding source provided the playground really is all that’s left at this park through the picnic shelter initiative that we started 5 years ago. We last year were able to put in a new structure and with that we replaced the railroad tie border. We also added new wood fiber all within that scope of that project because it’s all kind of tied in together so based on the study that was done we had kind of earmarked, it would have been about $100,000 to replace this but because everything else is already completed I think the plan would be to send out an RFP. Through that process we would just have to replace the playground in Herman Field and we’d be back up and running. Maintenance staff would do all the removals and then we would obviously send out the request for proposal and work with a few of the vendors that we have worked with over the past few years and we would put in a new playground. Let’s see here. Here’s a little Park and Recreation Commission – May 22, 2018 3 map of the location. Herman Field Park is off of Highway 7. Kind of tucked back in the neighborhood which connects to which? Hoffman: Minnewashta Regional Park. Adam Beer: Minnewashta Regional Park, thank you Todd. Prairie Knoll Park is also aging significantly. It was built and installed in 1996. This is probably the one of the worst I guess based on the fact that it has the old plastic ties for the container. Everything we put in now has a 4 foot concrete sidewalk with engineered wood fiber which meets the ADA code so again assuming this all moves through the removal would be done from park maintenance staff. We would install a new playground border that we’ve kind of matched. There’s a picnic shelter going in this year so we would tile that in to kind of match that, kind of the flow of the park through, around the picnic shelter and obviously the wood fiber would be a part of that $95,000 so again we would do all the removals in house and then go out to bid for the replacements. So also in 2019 Sunset Ridge Park which is built in 1991. I believe is our oldest infrastructure. It’s definitely showing it’s wear and tear. It has the old railroad tie border. A lot of the amenities, as you can see the, in the top left picture there they don’t, the log bridge, just a lot of safety, I don’t want to say they’re concerns but they’ve updated a lot of what’s out there nowadays. So again the removals would all be done in house. We would take all the pea gravel out. The border. The playground. This location there’s a shelter going in this year so again we would try to tie that all in on the reinstall so that’s Sunset Ridge Park. So that would be for 2019 and if you can see in your attachments I’ve put together a list of 2019 through 2023 and just we’re focusing tonight on just the two years so. Anybody have any questions so far? Kelly: Adam I believe what was it 2 years ago we visited Sunset Ridge Park and it, I mean it was noticeable to us that we have to figure out a funding source and so something with that park because it needs it badly. Beer: So after tonight we do have, as you see in one of your attachments we do have a tour scheduled to go revisit some of these top, higher priority areas so it will give us an opportunity to look through this tonight. Talk about any questions you guys might have and then we can go out on a field trip and take a closer look you know together and kind of walk through and talk through some of these things. So moving onto 2020. Curry Farms Park. The playground was put in somewhat recently. It’s in much, it’s in actually pretty good shape. We’ve been keeping up, the shelter was installed 3 years ago so the only thing that wasn’t addressed was, or is the basketball court. This was put in in 1998. You can see the starting to create bird baths. This was in kind of a low lying area so the pavement’s moving. It holds water pretty regularly with pretty small rainfalls so we’re constantly sending guys out to either blow it off or squeegee it off. The pole on the right photo there has been damaged from winter. Water must have got in and popped that loose so it just needs, this would be kind of the final piece at Curry Farms that would really tie the rest of the park together. There’s a new shelter so the goal here, as we were moving through was to keep these at $250,000 so we kind of went through and prioritized each project or each year based on trying to get as much done as we could while staying within that number. Park and Recreation Commission – May 22, 2018 4 Echternacht: Adam I don’t know maybe this should be Todd, you projected the screen that you gave us projected costs. It said $25,000 but this screen has $15,000 on it. When you listed all the parks and just what needed to be done in each one. Hoffman: Okay. Echternacht: So I don’t which, is $25,000 or $15,000? Hoffman: $15,000. Echternacht: $15,000. Beer: So $25,000, the $25,000 was what was sent out in the Park Master Plan. Those numbers are kind of bumped up for just to make sure for budgeting purposes but based on the fact that we’ve been doing a lot of these repairs over the last few years I’ve found some numbers. Echternacht: Okay. Beer: Based on actual costs of what we would likely have to spend to get this project done. Echternacht: Okay, thank you. Beer: Yep. Lake Ann Park beach playground. Was built in 1994 so it’s 24 years old. This is another site that’s aging significantly. If you can see in the top left photo it’s kind of small, it’s a railroad tie border and it’s completely decayed so we’ve been kind of bandaging things together over the last few years to just make it work. Obviously Lake Ann Park is one of our high priority facilities. It gets a lot of use. It’s right next to the beach so this would be a great opportunity to kind of step up the game for Lake Ann. It’s a pretty small footprint so I think we would get away with doing a smaller playground versus something like Herman Field where it’s a much bigger layout. Powers Ridge, or Powers Boulevard pipe rail fence. So these again we kind of sprinkled in some smaller projects that obviously are just as important for safety reasons. This is going along Powers Boulevard and it was put in 2004 so it’s getting up there. We’ve been making replacement updates to pieces that are damaged or contracting the work out when things get hit but as a whole the fence needs to be replaced. We can’t continue to keep pumping money in and putting the band aids on. We’re getting to the point of kind of no return so this is a great example. These pipe rail fences are all over the city. We have them, well they’re all over the place so this is one of the worst, I wanted to paint that picture for you guys. Rice March Lake backstop and benches. So this is a neighborhood park. Obviously it’s not used like Lake Ann, Lake Susan or Bandimere for the sporting events but it’s still a pretty heavily used neighborhood park. Lots of families go out there. There are some little tykes that have practice, t-ball practice out there and again as you can see from the bench photo is kind of getting to the point of no return and needs to be addressed. Todd and I went around and took photos of a Park and Recreation Commission – May 22, 2018 5 number of different ones and this one definitely made the top of the list for backstop and benches that need to be looked at. Feel free guys to jump in if you have any thoughts or questions as we’ve moving through here. South Lotus Lake. Again $95,000. Staff would do all the removals of the playground. This one has a fairly new border. So again we would kind of follow the same protocol. We would do the removals. Send everything out for an RFP. Pick a new playground and we would work with the contractor to do the reinstall. So this kind of paints a picture over the next 5 years of potential projects that we could look at and we, between Todd and I went through and kind of prioritized the stuff that would likely be needed to be addressed first. All of this stuff can be changed around if you feel differently but this would be staff’s recommendation to address these needs. Boettcher: I like the presentation. Definitely the pictures that shows everything. It looks like the life of everything on playground equipment if I caught it was 20 to 27 years so I think that’s about as good as you expect with usage and weather in this part of the country and everything. In looking at the numbers I believe at our meeting with City Council Todd, the Mayor had asked what the annual amount was. In the 2040 plan I think we had $267,000. Was the average per year? Hoffman: Correct. Boettcher: So we’re right in that ballpark. I mean that looks like a good plan. And then the tour on Tuesday, June 12th. Did you want to talk to that? Looks like we’re going to have to be walking pretty fast if we’re going to hit 8 of them in a couple of hours. Hoffman: We can do it. Beer: So the thought was you know we would go through this tonight and it would give you guys an opportunity to get back out there again for you know we would move on. Give you guys an opportunity to see everything. Ask any more questions of staff and then just kind of give you the ability to see it first hand once again. Kelly: So this is going to be presented to the City Council on Monday, the 25th of June. Hoffman: Correct. Kelly: Is it the work session at 5:00 or 5:30? Hoffman: Work session at 5:30 or 5:00 yeah. Kelly: Okay perfect, so we should try to have as many people there as we possibly can. And then the City Council will schedule it in their regular meeting after that? Hoffman: That’s up to them. Park and Recreation Commission – May 22, 2018 6 Kelly: Okay. Echternacht: Did you say 5:30 or 5:00? Kelly: 5:00 or 5:30, we’re not sure. Echternacht: Oh okay. Hoffman: Once it’s scheduled. Kelly: The work session usually starts at 5:00 but they’ll schedule a specific time for this. Petouvis: I just have a quick question about the Lake Ann Park playground. I’m wondering if, or what your thoughts are about perhaps prioritizing that a little higher than a similarly priced neighborhood playground just given the volume of usage at that park. Beer: Well a lot of it was just based on the actual footprint. Are you talking about size and making it? Hoffman: Moving it up really. Petouvis: Yeah putting it in an, maybe in 2019 instead of, I don’t have the numbers in my head but it was the Herman Field Park similarly priced. Hoffman: Yeah I think it basically has to do with the conditions so the condition is a little bit better and not nearly as glaring. The ones, the playgrounds that are scheduled in 2019 are actually behind a couple of years and so they’re getting, we continue to delay those and so when this original schedule was built those were in 2017 and now they’re in 2019 because that would be the first year of the project. Petouvis: And do you get a sense at all of how much success there might be getting these maintenance and replacement funds approved or sourced through the City Council? Hoffman: We can’t speak for the City Council. You’ll have to, it’s your recommendation tonight and then your conversation at the work session that will. Boettcher: We do know they’re aware of it from our meeting last month so. At the minimum they know about it. Tsuchiya: Adam I had a question. What’s the expected lifetime of the new equipment that may go in and the equipment that you’ve been putting in the last couple years? Is it pretty similar to what was installed in the 90’s or has it gotten a little better? Do you have any idea? Park and Recreation Commission – May 22, 2018 7 Beer: I think the average life expectancy based on what, the study that was done is about 25 years. That’s kind of the benchmark where you can probably start re-evaluating again. Tsuchiya: Okay. And to clarify what I heard you say earlier, from your inspections you didn’t see any safety concerns right now. Beer: All of the immediately safety concerns we address as a staff. Tsuchiya: Yeah. Beer: You know like. Tsuchiya: Well there’s nothing, my guess there’s nothing that you saw that couldn’t be addressed right now that would require the park to be shut down and that park to be put at the top of the list. Beer: There were a few of those situations. There was a few slides that were cracked that would have been you know $3,000-$4,000 to replace so we just removed them. Put a panel up and it’s just kind of band aid that was. Tsuchiya: I believe you guys did that at Bandimere right? Beer: There is one slide that. Tsuchiya: Yeah, my kids don’t like that. Beer: Mine don’t either. Hoffman: Go back to Herman Field and show them all the parts that are missing and/or modified. Beer: So Herman Field is one of the worst as far as things that we’ve taken out. So the green panel there, these pictures don’t do it a lot of justice but we’ve taken out 2 of the slides so there’s just the one remaining so basically half the playground is now closed off from what it used to be having different access points off of the decks. Tsuchiya: Oh the green panel was a slide? Beer: Correct. Tsuchiya: Okay. Now it’s just product information or whatever it may be. Park and Recreation Commission – May 22, 2018 8 Hoffman: And that pinch point. Tsuchiya: Yeah. And then the upper right the bowing in the plate I can see. Hoffman: There’s really not much left compared to what it was. Beer: Yeah. It looks, you know with all the updates that we’ve done with adding the new picnic shelter and the new border. The basketball court’s in fairly good condition so this would, this is really all that’s left and it would, we would be able to just go in and rip that thing out and pop a new one in. Tsuchiya: Would it be pretty similar, the new equipment? Our we going to get more bang for our buck at 55 than you were in the 90’s? Beer: Yea I think it would be bigger than this. We actually increased the footprint a little bit based on how we laid out the shelter so we kind of tied everything in so you literally walk from the shelter to a 4 foot walkway that spills right into the playground so we were able to increase the size of the container so we, I think we could make it a little bit bigger than it is now. Tsuchiya: Okay. Thank you. Boettcher: Any other questions? Discussion. Hoffman: Couple more. Commissioner Echternacht thank you for pointing that out. We will, so the original document that was created for this park replacement program was in the park master plan and so the park master plan addressed it. Created quite an extensive, so 20 years in it. Started to plug in some dollar amounts so we could get at those budget amounts so if you go back and look at that plan, that’s where you’ll see these numbers and so to avoid any confusion moving forward we’ll modify these numbers to match what we’re actually recommending. And then Commissioner Tsuchiya your one note, the paints are a lot better now and so when you see this fading, the equipment will age in place up to that 25 year timeframe but you’re probably not going to see a lot of fading in the paint like you do today and so if you go out to Sunset Ridge you’ll see it actually is in two different phases and the first phase is really bad paint and the second phase is a little bit better. You can see right there in the top on the left. The right hand side is the older and a year later the paint got better and it’s on the left hand side and what you’ll find in playgrounds is, there used to be some that were a little bit ahead of the others but they’ve all learned from each other in the last 25-30 years and their equipment is pretty much uniformly equal and has a long life span for paint and components. And like you said primarily we’re concerned in those safety issues so we don’t want pinch points, entanglements. Anything that’s against our consumer product safety commission guidelines and regulations and so that’s what we’re always looking for. And sometimes it just becomes so difficult to you know replace parts or maintain it that they’re putting up, just closing parts off until replacement takes place. Park and Recreation Commission – May 22, 2018 9 Tsuchiya: Okay. Boettcher: Anything else? If not we’re looking for a motion here. Recommending this to the City Council. Someone like to put it to the question? Kelly: Yeah, just find what the motion is here. Thank you. I propose that the Park and Recreation Commission recommends the City Council establish a park replacement fund and approve the 2019 to 2023 parks replacement schedule. Boettcher: Motion by Commissioner Kelly. Do we have a second? Echternacht: I’ll second it. Boettcher: Seconded by Commissioner Echternacht. Kelly moved, Echternacht seconded that the Park and Recreation Commission recommends the City Council establish a park replacement fund and approve the 2019 to 2023 parks replacement schedule. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. Boettcher: Motion carries. Now all we need is the money. Thank you Adam, very good. INTRODUCTION OF 2018 KLEINBANK SUMMER CONCERT SERIES. Matthews: Thank you commissioners. The City is proud to present the 2018 KleinBank Summer Concert Series at City Center Park plaza. The concert series is in it’s 14th year and will feature 9 performances throughout the summer. The first concert will be on Thursday, June 14th and continues every Thursday evening starting at 7:00 p.m. until Thursday, August 9th. There is one daytime performance that is geared towards children and families that will begin at 11:00 a.m. on Thursday, August 2nd. For each of the performances the City will be selling concessions, including the favorite freshly popped popcorn, candy and cold beverages. KleinBank of Chanhassen has again agreed to be the title sponsor of this series. Their sponsorship of $2,500 is greatly appreciated and helps offset the expense for this program. KleinBank also shows up to every concert and they provide free water for all the people enjoying the concerts and usually for the kids performances they have balloons or Freeze’s sometimes if it’s really hot to distribute throughout the crowd as well. We just, as a City we just really enjoy our relationship with KleinBank and we appreciate all they have done for this program and all they continue to do. The staff, we continue to explore creative and different ways of marketing strategies. One of the favorite ones is the KleinBank magnet with the concert series on it. We hand those out around City Hall and KleinBank Chanhassen before and then use them at the concerts as well. It’s a great way to just throw it up on your fridge so when you’re looking for something to do on Thursday night you’ve got the schedule right there. Does anybody have any questions? Park and Recreation Commission – May 22, 2018 10 Boettcher: Except they don’t stick on stainless steel fridges. Matthews: You’ve got to get them on the side. Boettcher: Try and get my wife to do that. I had a question on all the groups. Who does, do you go out and look, find them? Is there a list you choose from? Do you have to hang out at bars or what? Tsuchiya: Is that where she found the Teddy Bear Band? Boettcher: That’s what I’m thinking, I don’t know. I mean I was looking at it this afternoon. I said well that’s a pretty diverse group from the Johnny Cash tribute type band to the 50’s, 60’s, 70’s. Matthews: Yeah I try to get a variety of different bands just with all different groups and as you kind of, as I learned as I’ve kind of gone through this which groups are particularly popular like our tribute bands are always very popular. Last year we had Elvis and it was a big crowd and so actually working with Elvis they actually knew of the Church of Cash so they recommended it to me and after looking at it they’re a great band. So you just kind of, I’ve learned and then I also look at what other cities do. Sometimes bigger cities that, like Maple Grove has a great concert series so I try to see what they’re doing and then even smaller cities that are like Victoria as well just to kind of see what they’re doing. Boettcher: And as far as, I mean are they looking for pay? There’s got to be a variation there. Is it all free be from them or? Matthews: No. Boettcher: Do you have to go pick them up and bring them and set them up? Take it down. Matthews: No the fees vary depending on the performers. It’s kind of like a puzzle so you want to try to take certain performers that you know are going to draw a lot of people in sometimes require a little bit more money and then trying to fit it in as the schedule goes on so that’s where KleinBank comes, their sponsorship is very handy. Boettcher: Pretty crucial then. Matthews: Yeah, they help offset the costs. Boettcher: Looks like a good selection. Really good. Matthews: Thank you. Park and Recreation Commission – May 22, 2018 11 Boettcher: Any other questions for Katie? REPORTS: 2018 LAKE ANN PARK SUMMER PROGRAMS. Boettcher: Looks like we’re not going to do the photograph tonight. Lake Ann Park Summer Programs. Jerry I believe you’re up. Ruegemer: Thank you Vice Chair Boettcher. We’re really at an exciting time here for the summer of 2018. We are going to open up the concession building this weekend with the watercraft rentals and the, all the food options here for the summer. So it will be opened up on 11:00 a.m. on Saturday morning so we’ll be open this weekend Saturday, Sunday and Monday from 11:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. And then we’ll be open until Sunday the 18th of August for that so it’ll be an exciting time again this year. We’re going to be doing staff training down there on Thursday afternoon for that just to make sure that everybody’s up to speed down there so. We introduced a new item this year with Von Hansen Pretzels so we’re hoping that they’re going to be a big seller with that. There’s a couple different varieties of that so we’re excited for the year. We do have a concession manager hired. She’ll be doing all the work schedules and ordering supplies. She was down there today giving the concession building kind of a once over from the winter. It’s always a little dirty in the spring here so kind of get that ready to go. Adam and staff will get the boats in the water here in the next couple days here in time for staff training. We had Carver County Water Patrol go down there this morning and inspect the boats and life jackets. We’re all ready to go here for the 2018 season here so everything passed with flying colors with that. Twin Cities Paddleboards did deliver the paddleboards. The stand up paddleboards are there already locked up in the racks all ready to go for this weekend so we do have another annual contract with them again so it’s a great contract that they supply the paddleboards. We don’t have to lay out any money to purchase equipment. They handle all the maintenance of those. We provide the staff and we do a revenue split. 70 percent to the City and 30 percent to Jeff at Twin Cities Paddleboard so he loves the arrangement. We love the arrangement so everybody’s happy at this point and the stand up paddleboards have been really a great, great rental for us out there. People really enjoy those annually. So picnics have been extremely busy again. I don’t know that there is any Saturday or Sundays available left in, for the summer at Lake Ann so we’re pretty busy. Maybe late August but between you know family reunions and state ball tournaments and class reunions and all the above here we’re pretty busy. We do have some availability during the week so we do continue to get phone calls on a daily basis for that so you know we’ll, we’re kind of always project to be about 120 reserved picnics that people actually schedule and that will generate roughly $16,000 in revenue so there are obviously a lot of other people that will just use the shelters if they’re not open out at Lake Susan and both at Lake Ann so there’s a lot of those kind of impromptu picnics that are happening just with going out with the family or other, maybe company picnics just choose to use those sites and not reserve them. Kind of take their chances and also in the neighborhoods as well. Those are obviously happening that people are really utilizing the new shelters that we have in these Park and Recreation Commission – May 22, 2018 12 neighborhood situations too. I know people are using them for all kinds of family reunions, graduation parties people have called about so those are first come, first serve and residents or anybody are willing and able to use those really at any time. The beach is going to be opened up again starting Saturday, June 2nd for that so we have a, this will be our second year of our contract, 2 year contract with Minnetonka Aquatics so that’s been a long standing relationship that goes, dates back to the 1970’s so Minnetonka’s been a great provider of that service out at Lake Ann for many, many years. Obviously people can use the beach at any time during park hours, 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. but we will have guarded staff on there from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. daily starting at that June 2nd timeframe. And that will go then til August 12th, that Sunday, the second week in August with that so we’re excited. I’ve talked to Dan Berve, the Aquatics Director a couple times here so everything is pretty much ready to go. They’ve been busy with staff training and getting kind of things kind of ready to go for that so. Lake Ann is already hopping. Lots of people out there with people fishing out there today and out there on their own personal kayaks. All the canoe racks are full at this point out at Lake Ann so all 24 so we’re actually in pretty good shape out at Lake Ann so I’m really looking forward to a great summer. Lake Ann is our crown jewel and people really enjoy being out there. Boettcher: Good. As far as seasonal staff, do you know about how many people total you have? Ruegemer: For Lake Ann? Boettcher: Yeah. Ruegemer: We have 4. We have 1 manager and 3 other concessionaires for a total of 4. Boettcher: Just the 4 for the whole summer? Ruegemer: Yep. Boettcher: Okay. Ruegemer: Yeah and then we’ll kind of rotate shifts out there. Boettcher: Good. Any other questions for Jerry? Ruegemer: And if anybody has any suggestions or ideas they’d like to pass my way I’m all ears on how to make that operation better for our customers so ready, willing and able to take those on so. Boettcher: Good, thank you. Ruegemer: Thank you. Park and Recreation Commission – May 22, 2018 13 2018 ADULT SOFTBALL. Ruegemer: Thank you again. First time in 28 years that I’ve been here that we are not doing a Monday night league which is really disappointing. First time, which was you know we’ve had 8 teams in the past and up to probably 14 a couple years so we had 8 last year. I really tried to shake the bushes this year to try to make this go. It seemed like we had teams register and then they would like to pay at other communities so I’d lose one. I’d pick up 2. I’d lose 2 more and then I’d pick up another one so it goes all the way down kind of the end of the wire here so we’re not going to. Hoffman: They were playing for a… Ruegemer: They were definitely playing for a better day but, which is disappointing and obviously with that loss of that league we are a loss of revenue for that so the projected revenue then is a double header league. We play 28 games on that so based on that I was projecting revenue to be about $6,500 for that particular night with expenses at about, a little over $3,500 so kind of an overall loss of minus revenue and expenses is going to be a little shy of $3,000 so we’ll have to work in other areas to make that balance budget so we’ll take a look at that but the Thursday night league is still strong as ever with that so that league filled about a week after it opened so that’s a very popular night. People really like playing out at Lake Ann. That’s also a double header league out there. They play for 14 weeks. Play 28 games out there for that so league games are played on Fields 4, 5, and 6. Obviously if I had one more field out there we potentially could play on Field #1 and take that away from the youth baseball and add that to the adult softball program but I definitely would feel that and get probably for sure 4 more teams to play on that field as well so it’s something to consider for the future but there’s a, continues to be very popular and boy I probably had probably 6, 7, 8 phone calls of teams that were looking to get into that league after it was full so, so I tried to steer them towards Monday but that didn’t pan out but we’re going to continue to try to get that league back up again and see what else we can do to supplement. Boettcher: It just seems strange you have that much interest in Thursday but nobody likes Mondays. Ruegemer: Mondays is a tough night. You know that used to be a lot of the corporate night. We used to have a lot of business teams in town. It seemed like that was predominantly that but then as those teams started to kind of age out then I opened up to 10 other men’s open type of teams and then now that is starting to wain but that isn’t unique to Chanhassen with adult softball numbers dropping. You know people are aging out. The kids activities are taking up a lot more time and people are choosing to do non-team sports and kind of more individual type of thing so we’re going to keep looking for that next big ticket. Boettcher: Can you do a Tuesday and a Wednesday? Park and Recreation Commission – May 22, 2018 14 Ruegemer: We tried that too. Boettcher: Doesn’t work either huh? Ruegemer: No. Boettcher: Wow. Ruegemer: We’ve tried co-rec. Church co-rec. Regular co-rec. Women’s so, so if you guys have any ideas again I would listen so. Boettcher: Yeah the fields look great. I mean really good. Any other questions for Jerry? None, thank you Jerry. Appreciate it. Ruegemer: Yep, no problem. 2018 SUMMER PROGRAMS. Boettcher: And it looks like Katie, 2018 summer programs. Looks like you might be busy this summer huh? Matthews: Just a little bit. Boettcher: You take care of every one of these right? Matthews: No. No Jodi helps out. Well Jodi has a lot of them out at the Rec Center too but this is just a list of upcoming preschool, youth and family programs that the Park and Rec Department offered. I’m just going to touch on a few that I know about. Like I said some of these are out at the Rec Center that Jodi operates but our Dance for Fun summer classes, those are always very popular. Our Minnesota Twins baseball and softball clinic that we have for the, on the 3rd of July. That’s a big, that’s a very popular program. The penny carnival. The Lil Star t-ball. Track and field and all those Lil Star and Small Fry Sports out at the Rec Center. Our Summer Discovery Playground program is a program that I oversee that is very popular. Right now I think we have, I want to say 520 kids enrolled in that one so far so that one is very popular. We also have our teen volunteer program. We’ve got I want to say 10 volunteer applications that we are going to have our intern look into. She just started on Monday so that’s something that she’ll be overseeing. Lake Ann Adventure Camp, that one is full. We have 2 weeks of it and it’s 80 different kids each week so 160 kids total. We’ve got some youth archery programs that we partner with Carver County Parks. They provide the space and the equipment and we help provide the staff and the sign up. And then our 4th of July celebration is a great family one and our KleinBank Summer Concert Series. Does anybody have any questions about any of those or any program that you’ve heard of or that you’d like to see the City try? Park and Recreation Commission – May 22, 2018 15 Scanlon: What’s the Psychedelic Sports Sampler? Matthews: That is one that Jodi is doing. It’s a, I can’t tell you all the details but it’s just a camp for kids to come and try a bunch of different sports. Ruegemer: Just an offering of sports. Matthews: And it’s going to be awesome. Scanlon: I was just wondering what makes it psychedelic. Ruegemer: Just the name. Boettcher: Out of everything listed that caught your eye. Scanlon: You don’t see psychedelic very often. Boettcher: Now we know about him. I think you’re going to need a longer summer. That’s a lot of activities. That’s pretty amazing. Tsuchiya: I circles a couple for my kids now. Matthews: Yeah absolutely. We have more information on these programs at the City website, in the Connection or you can always give either Jodi and I a call and we’d be definitely happy to answer any of your questions or help through the sign up process. Boettcher: Good. Any other questions for Katie? Thank you. Matthews: Thank you. Boettcher: We won’t see you til October? Matthews: See you in September. Boettcher: Okay. Next items on the agenda. COMMISSION MEMBER COMMITTEE REPORTS. None. COMMISSION MEMBER PRESENTATIONS. None. ADMINISTRATIVE PACKET. Park and Recreation Commission – May 22, 2018 16 Boettcher: I noticed that there were 4 items in there. Had the Minutes from the Eastern Carver County Linking Trail Committee meeting March 7th and looks like the next one is September 19th in Victoria. Hoffman: You’re all welcomed to attend. With an email and reach out to them if you’d like to. Boettcher: And we had the Red Birds schedule. Looks like they start this Friday night. Ruegemer: Yeah they’ve had 4 games prior to this. This will be their first home game. Boettcher: The first home game, okay. Ruegemer: They’re 4 and 0 right now. Boettcher: Good. Ruegemer: And that will be in the schedule page in the Chanhassen Villager. It’s an insert this week. This coming Thursday and also the Memorial Day flyer will also be in this week. Boettcher: Can you get some of those to play for the Twins? Ruegemer: They won last night. Boettcher: Well yeah they did. And then there was another, the Memorial Day ceremony. You had a flyer on that. The times of everything taking place that day. Ruegemer: The cemetery visits are in the morning, yep. Boettcher: Yep, 7:45 a.m. and 8:15 and 10:15. Good. The Mayor will deliver keynote address. Finally we had the invitation, I took it as an invitation from Lauren Dale for her graduation if anyone plans to attend. Hoffman: Addressed to the commission. Boettcher: Okay, anyone have anything else to add? Kelly: Excuse me. Yeah I would like to remind the high schoolers who are attending today, Commissioner Schaeferle’s in his second year of being a commissioner. He’s a full voting commissioner so if you apply for a youth position you have the same rights and voting authority as any commissioner up here and we do have a spot normally for 2 youth commissioners so seriously think about joining us next year. Hoffman: If you live in Chanhassen. Park and Recreation Commission – May 22, 2018 17 Kelly: If you live in Chanhassen. That’s all I had. Boettcher: Alright. Hoffman: Chair we have, I don’t know if you’re aware of this. We have a lighting presentation that Jerry’s going to go. Ruegemer: Yeah just like to go real quick. Just put together a quick power point slide presentation here just from some pictures taken the other night at the lighting dedication at Lake Susan so we’ll go ahead and start that. There’s no music to it but it will scroll through with a number of images so enjoy. Tsuchiya: It’s not on our screens. Ruegemer: No music. (A slide presentation was shown at this point in the meeting.) Tsuchiya: What time was that taken at? Ruegemer: That was between 9:00 and 10:00. Tsuchiya: Wow, very nice. Ruegemer: Home run hitter…participants. That was at about 10:10 and completion of the 15 hero baseball game. Jeff Olson, one of the members of the Dugout Club giving a presentation of the good work they do in town. Hoffman: Those dugouts are brand new as well. That was the last project the Dugout completed. Scoreboard is also their project. Ruegemer: Beautiful night for baseball on Sunday night. It was an absolutely gorgeous night. That was about a quarter to 10:00 when that picture was taken. Boettcher: So it looks like there’s very little spillover of the light. I mean it’s directed. So from Lake Drive East you wouldn’t glare anything. Ruegemer: Mayor Laufenburger coaching first base. Echternacht: Putting these lights into Bandimere we won’t have problems with the neighbors then. Park and Recreation Commission – May 22, 2018 18 Hoffman: That’s right. Yeah this light cuts out, it only, any light goes to 70 feet. Most of it cuts out at 25 feet. Ruegemer: We’re getting close to the end. Hoffman: A lot of buzz about this park becoming you know a real baseball park. Baseball right in the middle of our community which is a nice amenity for our community and then in the future really all it takes to become a baseball stadium is a stadium so at some point in the future of our history of our town build a stadium there with bleachers overlooking the field. Underneath you have the classic traditional restrooms and concessions down below. Then you’ve got full service baseball available to your community. Boettcher: What about glare for an outfielder, do you lose the light? Lose the ball in the light? Hoffman: It’s so nice. Highly engineered. There’s up lights and so when a pop fly goes up they’re illuminated from underneath. Very easy to pick up. Pick up in the lights. And there is a 25 year warranty so a 25 year warranty on the lights is we don’t have to touch them. Boettcher: Nice. And you said the plaque will be displayed out there? Hoffman: It is. Boettcher: It’s going to be, it’s on one of the dugouts or? Hoffman: It’s on the first base dugout on the west side, yeah. Boettcher: On the west side, okay. Hoffman: So they contributed $55,000. $1,000 went to the plaque so we got $54,000 out of the $55,000 so… Scanlon: It’s a $1,000 plaque? Hoffman: It’s a $1,000 bronze plaque, yeah. Scanlon: Oh a bronze plaque, just making sure. Boettcher: So do we all get to go out there and sign since we were sitting members here? Immortalized. Very good pictures Jerry. Looks like a great deal. With that I’ll entertain a motion to adjourn. Park and Recreation Commission – May 22, 2018 19 Echternacht moved, Petouvis seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. The Park and Recreation Commission meeting was adjourned at 8:10 p.m. Submitted by Todd Hoffman Park and Rec Director Prepared by Nann Opheim CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 25, 2018 Subject Ordinance 633: Pervious Pavers City Code Amendment (Chapters 7 and 20) Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.4. Prepared By Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director & Paul Oehme, Public Works Director/City Engineer File No: ORD 2018­02 PROPOSED MOTION The Chanhassen City Council adopts the attached ordinance amending Chapters 7 and 20 of the City Code. Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND On May 15, 2018 the Planning Commission voted 4­3 to advance this item, with the stipulation that the City Council be made aware of and consider the concerns stated by the Planning Commissioners. The Planning Commission deliberated on a number of issues, listed in the order that they appear within the verbatim minutes. The 4­3 vote to recommend approval seemed resigned based upon their discussion. 1. Builders could use pervious pavers in lieu of impervious surfaces when initially constructing home to build homes with a larger footprint than would currently be permitted by city ordinance. This could result in both larger homes and new homeowners still being unable to add patios and other accessory uses due the home being built up to the new maximum lot cover. 2. This is a de facto increase in hard cover. It would be better to give credit on stormwater bills or otherwise incentivize the use of pervious pavements within the existing lot cover caps. There is concern that this is a way to allow individuals who built/purchased a home built to lot cover to circumvent the existing lot cover limits. 3. Preference was expressed for allowing pervious pavements in such a way that they can only be used to add patios/outdoor areas that would otherwise not be possible, but not utilized to free up lot coverage for the construction of larger homes. 4. 25 percent limit is 25 percent limit and homeowners and builders should plan/build around that. 5. Concern that 5 percent of larger residential lots could be a very large amount of additional lot coverage. Noted that many lots in the city exceed their district’s minimum size standard. 6. Suggestion that ordinance could be structured to be 5 percent additional lot coverage not to exceed a fixed CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, June 25, 2018SubjectOrdinance 633: Pervious Pavers City Code Amendment (Chapters 7 and 20)Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.4.Prepared By Kate Aanenson, CommunityDevelopment Director & Paul Oehme,Public Works Director/City Engineer File No: ORD 2018­02PROPOSED MOTIONThe Chanhassen City Council adopts the attached ordinance amending Chapters 7 and 20 of the City Code.Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDOn May 15, 2018 the Planning Commission voted 4­3 to advance this item, with the stipulation that the City Councilbe made aware of and consider the concerns stated by the Planning Commissioners.The Planning Commission deliberated on a number of issues, listed in the order that they appear within the verbatimminutes. The 4­3 vote to recommend approval seemed resigned based upon their discussion.1. Builders could use pervious pavers in lieu of impervious surfaces when initially constructing home to build homeswith a larger footprint than would currently be permitted by city ordinance. This could result in both largerhomes and new homeowners still being unable to add patios and other accessory uses due the home being builtup to the new maximum lot cover.2. This is a de facto increase in hard cover. It would be better to give credit on stormwater bills or otherwiseincentivize the use of pervious pavements within the existing lot cover caps. There is concern that this is a wayto allow individuals who built/purchased a home built to lot cover to circumvent the existing lot cover limits.3. Preference was expressed for allowing pervious pavements in such a way that they can only be used to addpatios/outdoor areas that would otherwise not be possible, but not utilized to free up lot coverage for theconstruction of larger homes.4. 25 percent limit is 25 percent limit and homeowners and builders should plan/build around that.5. Concern that 5 percent of larger residential lots could be a very large amount of additional lot coverage. Notedthat many lots in the city exceed their district’s minimum size standard. 6. Suggestion that ordinance could be structured to be 5 percent additional lot coverage not to exceed a fixed amount to prevent larger properties from being allowed thousands of feet of additional lot cover. 7. Suggestion that the ordinance require a two­for­one installation of pervious pavements, i.e. if a homeowner wanted 750 square feet of pervious paver patio over what is currently allowed by code, they would have to replace an additional 750 square feet of impervious surface on their property with pervious pavers. During the Public Hearing portion of the May 15, 2018 meeting an industry expert spoke in favor of allowing the unrestricted installation pervious pavements. He felt that from a stormwater management standpoint they outperformed many of Chanhassen’s existing soils and that the technology should be evaluated and regulated purely on its stormwater management implications. This testimony caused the planning commission to consider what the value of greenspace (yards) is within the city. On June 11, 2018 the City Council discussed the concerns raised by the planning commissioners. The City Council indicated that they respected and appreciated the concerns, but were comfortable with the ordinance as drafted, and instructed staff to place the proposed amendment on the next meeting’s agenda. DISCUSSION Pervious Pavements (full report is presented as an attachment) Report Summary For over a year staff has been investigating the possibility of allowing residents to utilize pervious pavers to exceed existing lot coverage limits. Since lot coverage is linked to both stormwater management and the overall intensity of land use within the city, it is important to balance the benefits of allowing increased lot coverage with its potential consequences. The city must also make sure that any proposed change to the ordinance will satisfactorily address the issue of properties with substandard lots that are built up to or above their permitted lot cover. Staff believes that allowing homes located in Residential Single Family Districts (RSF) outside of the Shoreland Management District five percent additional lot coverage in the form of pervious pavement will provide flexibility for homeowners looking to improve their properties while minimizing the potential for negative impacts. Ordinance in Brief Staff proposes allowing RSF properties 30 percent lot cover, of which no more than 25 percent may be impervious surfaces. Properties within the shoreland overlay district would still be limited to 25 percent lot cover. Staff proposes that in order to be considered pervious pavement a system must be designed to provide rate and volume control for the first half inch of treatment area, conform to City of Chanhassen Standard Specification and Detail Plates, be designed to Interlocking Concrete Pavement Institute (ICPI) standards, and be installed by an ICPI certified installer. Staff proposes that owners of these systems be required to enter into a maintenance agreement with the city. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the proposed amendments to the City Code. ATTACHMENTS: Pervious Pavement Ordinance Pervious Pavement Staff Report 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 633 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 7, BUILDING AND BUILDING REGULATIONS AND CHAPTER 20, ZONING OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 7-19(21) of the Chanhassen City Code is amended to read as follows: (21) Calculation of the amount and percentage of the lot coverage for the lot or parcel broken out by impervious surfaces and pervious pavement, if present. Section 2. Section 20-109(4)(h)(4) of the Chanhassen City Code is amended to read as follows: 4. Percent of lot coverage on site broken out by impervious surface and pervious pavement. Section 3. Section 20-615(5) of the Chanhassen City Code is amended to read as follows: (5) The maximum lot coverage for all structures and paved surfaces is 30 percent, of which no more than 25 percent can be impervious surfaces. For flag/neck lots neither the area within the neck, nor the lot coverage of the driveway within the neck shall be included within the calculation of the lot area or lot coverage of the lot. Section 4. The Chanhassen City Code is amended by adding Section 20-921 to read as follows: Sec. 20-921 –Pervious Pavement Properly designed, installed, and maintained pervious pavements have the capacity to allow for stormwater detention and/or infiltration. When not properly designed, installed, and maintained pervious pavements fail to facilitate the detention and/or infiltration of stormwater. Additionally, pervious pavements contribute to the creation of heat islands and do not provide the same surface water management benefits as native vegetative cover. For these reasons, it is necessary to regulate the lot coverage, design, installation, and maintenance of these systems. 1) Lot Coverage: Pervious pavements are considered to constitute lot coverage; however, when built to the standards espoused in this section they do not constitute impervious surfaces. Systems not built to the standards espoused in this section are considered to constitute impervious surfaces. 2) Location Restrictions: 2 a. Pervious pavements may not be installed in areas where trash or garbage receptacles will be stored. 3) Design and Installation: a. A building permit is required for the instillation of pervious pavement systems. b. Pervious pavement systems must be designed to provide for rate and volume control for the first half inch (0.5”) of treatment area and follow the current version of The City of Chanhassen Standard Specification and Detail Plates. Treatment area includes the total square footage of the pervious pavement system plus the total square footage of impervious surface draining directly to the pervious pavement system. c. To meet the city’s definition of pervious pavement the system must: 1) be designed in compliance with standards established by the Interlocking Concrete Pavement Institute (ICPI); 2) be installed by an ICPI certified installer; and, 3) be designed to meet or exceed the standards listed in paragraph (b). d. The City Engineer may permit pervious pavement technologies other than permeable interlocking concrete pavers, so long as the City Engineer determines: 1) they are functionally equivalent or better; 2) the system is designed in compliance with accepted guidelines and is installed by an appropriately certified installer; and, 3) the system will meet or exceed the standards listed in paragraph (b). 4) Maintenance: a. The owner of a pervious paver system must enter into a maintenance agreement with the city to ensure the system performs as designed in perpetuity. This agreement must conform to the manufactures guidelines, and stipulate the frequency and type of maintenance to be performed. 5) District restrictions: a. Planned Unit Developments Residential Districts (PUDR) are limited to the lot coverage specified by their ordinance and/or compliance table. For PUDRs created before June 11, 2018 the terms hardcover, hard surface, impervious surface, and similar phrases shall be understood to mean lot cover inclusive of both pervious pavements and impervious surfaces, and in no circumstance shall the failure of the ordinance or compliance table to mention pervious pavements be understood to mean that pervious pavements are not subject to the lot cover, hardcover, hardscape, or similarly identified limits that govern the PUDR. b. Shoreland Management District restricts properties zoned Single Family Residential District (RSF) to 25 percent lot coverage. Section 5. This ordinance shall be effective as of the 1st day of August, 2018. PASSED AND ADOPTED this [xx] day of [Month], 2018 by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Denny Laufenburger, Mayor 3 (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on [insert date]) CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 25, 2018 Subject Ordinance 634: Beekeeping (Amending City Code Chapters 4, 5, and 20) Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.5. Prepared By MacKenzie Walters, Assistant Planner File No: ORD 2018­03 PROPOSED MOTION “The Chanhassen City Council approves an Ordinance amending Chapters 4, 5, and 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, and approves a Summary Ordinance for Publication Purposes.” City Council approval of the ordinance requires a simple majority vote of the City Council; however, approval of the summary ordinance requires a four fifth majority. Council approval requires a 4/5 Vote. SUMMARY An ordinance to permit beekeeping on lots one­third acre or larger. BACKGROUND On May 15, 2018 the Planning Commission voted 7 to 0 to table the beekeeping code amendment to the next Planning Commission meeting and instructed staff to revise the proposed ordinance to allow for beekeeping on smaller lots, require a permit, and require the notification of neighbors. On June 11, 2018 the Planning Commission voted 5 to 1 to recommend that the City Council adopt the proposed ordinance on beekeeping. DISCUSSION Beekeeping (full report is presented as an attachment) Report Summary City staff has received numerous requests from residents asking that the city reexamine its policy of classifying honey bees as farm animals and limiting them to parcels of at least 10 acres in size. Staff conducted a review of how other cities in the area regulate honey bees and found a roughly even split between cities that allow them on most single­ family lots, and those that treat them as agricultural animals or ban them outright. Many cities that place heavy restrictions on bees do so due to the potential for bees to create nuisances; however, staff feels that setbacks, limits on the number of hives permitted, minimum lot sizes, and trained beekeepers can significantly mitigate these concerns. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, June 25, 2018SubjectOrdinance 634: Beekeeping (Amending City Code Chapters 4, 5, and 20)Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.5.Prepared By MacKenzie Walters, Assistant Planner File No: ORD 2018­03PROPOSED MOTION“The Chanhassen City Council approves an Ordinance amending Chapters 4, 5, and 20 of the Chanhassen CityCode, and approves a Summary Ordinance for Publication Purposes.”City Council approval of the ordinance requires a simple majority vote of the City Council; however, approval of thesummary ordinance requires a four fifth majority.Council approval requires a 4/5 Vote.SUMMARYAn ordinance to permit beekeeping on lots one­third acre or larger.BACKGROUNDOn May 15, 2018 the Planning Commission voted 7 to 0 to table the beekeeping code amendment to the nextPlanning Commission meeting and instructed staff to revise the proposed ordinance to allow for beekeeping on smallerlots, require a permit, and require the notification of neighbors.On June 11, 2018 the Planning Commission voted 5 to 1 to recommend that the City Council adopt the proposedordinance on beekeeping.DISCUSSIONBeekeeping(full report is presented as an attachment)Report SummaryCity staff has received numerous requests from residents asking that the city reexamine its policy of classifying honeybees as farm animals and limiting them to parcels of at least 10 acres in size. Staff conducted a review of how othercities in the area regulate honey bees and found a roughly even split between cities that allow them on most single­family lots, and those that treat them as agricultural animals or ban them outright. Many cities that place heavy restrictions on bees do so due to the potential for bees to create nuisances; however, staff feels that setbacks, limits on the number of hives permitted, minimum lot sizes, and trained beekeepers can significantly mitigate these concerns. Ordinance in Brief Staff proposes allowing owners of properties one­third acre or larger to apply for and receive a beekeeping permit. The permit would be used to verify the successful completion of a beekeeping course, colony density and setbacks requirements, and that neighboring properties have been notified. Staff is also proposing the establishment of definitions relating to beekeeping, colony density and setback provisions, standards of practice, provisions for revoking permits, and a $25.00 processing fee for beekeeping permits. Public Hearing During the May 15, 2018 public hearing members of the public expressed a general support for provisions in the city’s proposed beekeeping ordinance; however, they stated that the proposed half­acre minimum lot size was excessive. They expressed a willingness to go through a permitting process to verify training and setbacks, if it meant the city would allow for beekeeping on smaller lots. The Planning Commission discussed the general safety and nuisance concerns associated with beekeeping, before concluding that they supported allowing beekeeping through a city issued permit. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the proposed amendment to the City Code. ATTACHMENTS: Beekeeping City Council Staff Report Beekeeping Ordinance Summary of Beekeeping Ordinance 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 634 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 4, LICENSE, PERMIT, AND ADMINISTRATIVE FEES, CHAPTER 5, ANIMALS AND FOWL, AND CHAPTER 20, ZONING OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Section 1. The Chanhassen City Code is amended by adding Section 4-30(b)(22) to read as follows: 22. Beekeeping Permit….. $25.00 Section 2. The Chanhassen City Code is amended by adding Section 5-107 to Section 5-135 to read as follows: Sec. 5-108 – 119. - Reserved ARTICLE IV. – HONEY BEES Sec. 5-120. – Definitions. In this article, the following terms have the stated meanings: “Apiary” means the assembly of one or more colonies of bees at a single location. “Beekeeper” means a person who owns or has charge of one or more colonies of bees. “Beekeeping equipment” means anything used in the operation of an apiary, such as hive bodies, supers, frames, top and bottom boards and extractors. “Colony” means an aggregate of bees consisting principally of workers, but having, when perfect, one queen and at times drones, brood, combs, and honey. “Hive” means the receptacle inhabited by a colony that is manufactured for that purpose. “Honey bee” means all life stages of the common domestic honey bee, apis mellifera species. “Lot” means a contiguous parcel of land under common ownership. “Undeveloped property” means any idle land that is not improved or actually in the process of being improved with residential, commercial, industrial, church, park, school or governmental facilities or other structures or improvements intended for human use or occupancy and the grounds maintained in associations therewith. The term shall be deemed to include property 2 developed exclusively as a street or highway or property used for commercial agricultural purposes. Sec. 5-121.- Purpose of Ordinance. The purpose of this ordinance is to establish certain requirements for beekeeping within the city, to avoid issues which might otherwise be associated with beekeeping in populated areas. 1) Compliance with this ordinance shall not be a defense to a proceeding alleging that a given colony constitutes a nuisance, but such compliance may be offered as evidence of the beekeeper’s efforts to abate any proven nuisance. 2) Compliance with this ordinance shall not be a defense to a proceeding alleging that a given colony violates applicable ordinances regarding public health, but such compliance may be offered as evidence of the beekeeper’s compliance with acceptable standards of practice among hobby beekeepers in the State of Minnesota. Sec. 5-122.-Permit required 1) No person shall maintain or keep honey bees without a permit issued by the City. 2) Application for the permit required by article shall be made to the City upon a form furnished by the City. A nonrefundable fee in the amount established by resolutions shall be paid to the City when the application if filed. 3) In order to be issued a permit the applicant must: a. Provide proof of having successfully completed 16 hours of training in beekeeping through the University of Minnesota, or similarly reputable organization. b. Have a lot of one-third acre or larger. c. Submit a notarized statement to City stating that they have informed all adjoining neighbors that they intend to keep honey bees. d. Not have had a prior beekeeping permit revoked by the City of Chanhassen. e. Meet the colony density and setback requirements listed in Sec. 5-123. Sec. 5-123.- Colony Density and Setbacks 1) No person is permitted to keep more than the following numbers of colonies on any lot within the city, based upon the size of the apiary lot: a. Lots one-third acre or larger but smaller than one acre: two colonies b. Lots one acre or larger but smaller than two and one-half acres: four colonies c. Lots two and one-half acres or larger but smaller than ten acres: eight colonies d. Lots larger than ten acres: no limit 2) Colonies must be located in the rear yard and must be setback from the property lines a minimum of 25 feet. a. On lots with multiple street frontages, colonies may not be located in any yard with street frontage. b. On lots directly adjacent to undeveloped property colonies may be setback a minimum of 10 feet from lot lines dividing the property from the undeveloped property. The colonies must still be setback a minimum of 25 feet from any lot line dividing the property from any parcel that is not undeveloped property. If the undeveloped property is later improved so as to no longer meet the definition of 3 undeveloped property, the colonies’ location shall not be considered vested and it must be removed or relocated to comply with the 25-foot minimum setback. Sec. 5-124.- Standards of Practice The following standards of practice apply to all properties in the city: 1) Beekeepers must select queens from European stock bred for gentleness and non- swarming characteristics. 2) Honey bee colonies shall be kept in hives with removable frames, which must be kept in sound and usable conditions. 3) Each beekeeper must ensure that a convenient source of water is available within ten feet of each colony at all times that the colonies remain active outside the hive. 4) Each beekeeper must ensure that no wax comb or other material that might encourage robbing by other bees that are left upon the grounds of the apiary lot. Such materials once removed from the site shall be handled and stored in sealed containers, or placed within a building or other vermin-proof container. 5) Each beekeeper shall maintain their beekeeping equipment in good condition, including keeping the hives painted if they have been painted but are peeling or flaking, and securing unused equipment from weather, potential theft or vandalism and occupancy by swarms. 6) Honey bee colonies may not be kept on a lot with a multi-tenant building. 7) Beekeepers in districts zoned for residential use are allowed to sell honey as a home occupation in accordance with chapter 20, article XXIII, division 3, Sec. 20-976 – Sec. 20-1000, with the understanding that the apiary and hives shall not be considered to violate Sec. 20-979. Sec. 5-125.- Revocation of Permit A beekeeping permit issued under this article may be revoked by the Community Development Director if it is determined after an inspection by City staff that the permit holder has not maintained the standards set forth in Sec. 5-124 or that bees are being kept in such a manner as to constitute a public nuisance. Sec. 5-126 - 135.- Reserved Section 3. Section 20-1001 of the Chanhassen City Code is amended to read as follows: Sec. 20-1001. - Keeping. The following animals may be kept in the city: (1) Household pets are an allowed use in all zoning districts. (2) Horses in the A-2, RR and RSF zoning districts in accordance with chapter 5, article III. (3) Honey bees in accordance with chapter 5, article IV. (4) Farm animals are an allowed use on all farm property zoned A-2 or RR, which permit agricultural use, with a minimum parcel area of ten acres, except as otherwise specifically 4 provided in the City Code. Farm animals may not be confined in a pen, feed lot or building within 100 feet of any residential dwelling not owned or leased by the farmer. (5) Wild animals may not be kept in the city. (6) Animals may only be kept for commercial purposes if authorized in the zoning district were the animals are located. (7) Animals may not be kept if they cause a nuisance or endanger the health or safety of the community. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this [xx] day of [Month], 2018 by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Denny Laufenburger, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on [insert date]) 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 634 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 4, LICENSE, PERMIT AND ADMINISTRAIVE FEES; CHAPTER 5, ANIMALS AND FOWL; AND CHAPTER 20, ZONING OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE The purpose of these code amendments are as follows: Amend Section 4-30(b)(22) to establish a $25.00 beekeeping permit fee; and Amend Section 5-108 to Section 5-119 to reserve space for future amendments; and Amend Section 5-120 to define the terms apiary, beekeeper, beekeeping equipment, colony, hive, honey bee, lot, and undeveloped property within Article IV.-Honey bees; and Amend Section 5-121 to state that the intent of the beekeeping ordinance is to establish requirements for beekeeping with in the city and that it does not exempt colonies from the city nuisance ordinance; and Amend Section 5-122 to require a permit for beekeeping and establish that to receive a permit an application form, fee, proof of training, proof of neighbor notification, and evidence of compliance with colony density and setback requirements must be provided; and Amend Section 5-123 to establish colony density and setback requirements; and Amend Section 5-124 to establish standards of practice for beekeeping; and Amend Section 5-125, to state that a beekeeping permit may be revoked if the permit holder violates the standards of practice for beekeeping or if the bees our found to constitute a nuisance. Add Section 20-126 to Section 20-135 to reserve space for future amendments; and Amend Section 20-1001 to allow for the keeping of honey bees in accordance with chapter 5, article IV. A printed copy of Ordinance No. 634 is available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Manager/Clerk. PASSED, ADOPTED, AND APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION this 25th day of June, 2018, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen. (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on June 21, 2018) CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 25, 2018 Subject Conditional Use Permit 2018­08: Approve Xcel Energy Transmission Line to be located south of the intersection of Audubon Road and Lyman Boulevard Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.6. Prepared By Sharmeen Al­Jaff, Senior Planner File No: PC 2018­08 PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves the Conditional Use Permit to allow a transmission line to be located south of the intersection of Audubon Road and Lyman Boulevard – Planning Case 2018­08, subject to the conditions of approval." Council approval requires a Majority Vote of the entire council. SUMMARY Consider a request for a conditional use permit to allow a transmission line to be located south of the intersection of Audubon Road and Lyman Boulevard. BACKGROUND The Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 5, 2018 to review the proposed development application. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit to allow a transmission line to be located south of the intersection of Audubon Road and Lyman Boulevard subject to the conditions of approval in the staff report. There were no issues or concerns with the proposal. DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit for the purpose of constructing and operating a 115kV transmission line.  The line is intended to span 1.5 miles between the cities of Chaska and Chanhassen.  It will begin by connecting to an existing transmission line in the southeast quadrant of Lyman Boulevard and Audubon Road in Chanhassen. It will end at the Lake Hazeltine substation on the west side of Columbia Court North in Chaska. The proposed transmission line will consist of conductors attached to weathered steel monopole  structures with davit arms on a drilled pier concrete foundation. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit to allow a transmission line to be located CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, June 25, 2018SubjectConditional Use Permit 2018­08: Approve Xcel Energy Transmission Line to be located south ofthe intersection of Audubon Road and Lyman BoulevardSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.6.Prepared By Sharmeen Al­Jaff, Senior Planner File No: PC 2018­08PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council approves the Conditional Use Permit to allow a transmission line to be located south of theintersection of Audubon Road and Lyman Boulevard – Planning Case 2018­08, subject to the conditions ofapproval."Council approval requires a Majority Vote of the entire council.SUMMARYConsider a request for a conditional use permit to allow a transmission line to be located south of the intersection ofAudubon Road and Lyman Boulevard.BACKGROUNDThe Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 5, 2018 to review the proposed development application. ThePlanning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit to allow atransmission line to be located south of the intersection of Audubon Road and Lyman Boulevard subject to theconditions of approval in the staff report. There were no issues or concerns with the proposal.DISCUSSIONThe applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit for the purpose of constructing and operating a 115kVtransmission line.  The line is intended to span 1.5 miles between the cities of Chaska and Chanhassen.  It will begin byconnecting to an existing transmission line in the southeast quadrant of Lyman Boulevard and Audubon Road inChanhassen. It will end at the Lake Hazeltine substation on the west side of Columbia Court North in Chaska.The proposed transmission line will consist of conductors attached to weathered steel monopole  structures with davitarms on a drilled pier concrete foundation.RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit to allow a transmission line to be located south of the intersection of Audubon Road and Lyman Boulevard as shown in the attached Exhibit A – Planning Case 2018­08, subject to the following condition: 1. Approval of the Conditional Use Permit is contingent upon final approval of the Environmental Assessment and a resolution declaring no need for an Environmental Impact Statement. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A Planning Commission Staff Report Conditional Use Permit 2018­08 Exhibit A 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #2018-08 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants a conditional use permit for the following use: A transmission line to be located south of the intersection of Audubon and Lyman Boulevard. 2. Property. The permit is for property situated in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota, and legally described in the attached Exhibit A. 3. Conditions. Subject to the following condition as shown in the attached Exhibit B: Approval of the Conditional Use Permit is contingent upon final approval of the EA and a resolution declaring no need for an Environmental Impact Statement. 4. Termination of Permit. The City may revoke the permit following a public hearing for violation of the terms of this permit. 5. Lapse. If within one year of the issuance of this permit the authorized construction has not been substantially completed or the use commenced, this permit shall lapse, unless an extension is granted in accordance with the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. 6. Criminal Penalty. Violation of the terms of this conditional use permit is a criminal misdemeanor. 2 Dated: June 25, 2018 CITY OF CHANHASSEN By: Denny Laufenburger, Mayor SEAL By: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of ________, 2018, by Denny Laufenburger, Mayor and Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 Exhibit B CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 25, 2018 Subject Law Enforcement Update Section FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE Item No: F.1. Prepared By Lt. Eric Kittleson, Carver County Sheriff's Office File No:  ATTACHMENTS: Cover Memo May 2018 Statistics Activity Decsription by Class CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 25, 2018 Subject Fire Department Update Section FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE Item No: F.2. Prepared By Don Johnson, Fire Chief File No:  SUMMARY The monthly update for the Chanhassen Fire Department to include call data from May 2018.  BACKGROUND Fire Department Staffing Staffing is at 43 of 45 paid on­call firefighters as of the end of June. We have had some significant changes over the past month. First off, we successfully completed the 2018 hiring process adding five new firefighters to our ranks.  Those firefighters began service on June 18, 2018 and were introduced to the department at the annual Black Hat Ceremony.  The SW fire academy will begin July 31, 2018.  One firefighter is from the Station 2 area.  We also reinstated Firefighter Doug Foote on June 18, 2018 as he returned from a one­year leave from the department. Doug moved back to the Station 2 area and will add personnel and experience on the west end. Additionally, Firefighter Joe Brennan, a 20­year veteran, has announced his retirement from the department effective June 30, 2018.  Joe will be brought to council at some point this fall for recognition. Lastly, a 2017 probationary firefighter resigned shortly after completing training this year.  This was due to some life changes that included moving out of the call area.  Fire Department Response The fire department responded to 86 calls in May and continues to experience record level calls for service in 2018. If projections hold, we could see an increase of 13% and over 100 additional calls compared to 2017.  Duty crews responded to 9 calls in May and year to date a total of 49 duty crew calls for 2018 not representing a majority of the increased call load.    Significant calls included the following: (41) EMS calls with 6 Motor Vehicle Accidents CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, June 25, 2018SubjectFire Department UpdateSectionFIRE DEPARTMENT/LAWENFORCEMENT UPDATE Item No: F.2.Prepared By Don Johnson, Fire Chief File No: SUMMARYThe monthly update for the Chanhassen Fire Department to include call data from May 2018. BACKGROUNDFire Department StaffingStaffing is at 43 of 45 paid on­call firefighters as of the end of June. We have had some significant changes over thepast month.First off, we successfully completed the 2018 hiring process adding five new firefighters to our ranks.  Thosefirefighters began service on June 18, 2018 and were introduced to the department at the annual Black HatCeremony.  The SW fire academy will begin July 31, 2018.  One firefighter is from the Station 2 area. We also reinstated Firefighter Doug Foote on June 18, 2018 as he returned from a one­year leave from thedepartment. Doug moved back to the Station 2 area and will add personnel and experience on the west end.Additionally, Firefighter Joe Brennan, a 20­year veteran, has announced his retirement from the department effectiveJune 30, 2018.  Joe will be brought to council at some point this fall for recognition.Lastly, a 2017 probationary firefighter resigned shortly after completing training this year.  This was due to some lifechanges that included moving out of the call area. Fire Department ResponseThe fire department responded to 86 calls in May and continues to experience record level calls for service in 2018.If projections hold, we could see an increase of 13% and over 100 additional calls compared to 2017.  Duty crewsresponded to 9 calls in May and year to date a total of 49 duty crew calls for 2018 not representing a majority of theincreased call load.   Significant calls included the following: (41) EMS calls with 6 Motor Vehicle Accidents (4) Fire Responses (1) Deck Fire at Chan View Apartments (1) Mutual Aid Structure Fire to Excelsior (1) Mutual Aid Structure Fire to Victoria (1) Mutual Aid Grass Fire to Chaska (2) Citizen Complaints for Illegal Burning (3) Additional responses to Unauthorized Burning (Observed by responders) Monthly Training  Training that occurred since my last update: June Officers Training­Professional Leadership Development Auto Extrication Skills Training Other Activities April 27­Assist to Chanhassen Elementary for their Annual Color Run Event May 28­Assist to Chanhassen Legion Honor Guard with Memorial Day Cemetery Visits May 28­Staff the City Memorial Day Celebration Event with a Standby Medical Crew June 2­Assist to Lion’s Fundraising Event at Arboretum benefiting juvenile hearing loss June 11­Chanhassen Fire Department Annual Picnic sponsored by the Relief Association June 18­Annual Black Hat Ceremony honoring Firefighters Mike Anderson, Aaron Busch, Jake Coleman, Dan Martinez, and Angelo Silione for completing a two­year probationary period Upcoming Events 4th of July – We are staffing several positions on multiple days to support city events and ensure everyone has a safe visit to Chanhassen. Fire Marshal Update Construction Projects of Note/Fire Inspections: 1. West Park II Townhomes: several units were given final occupancy inspections with many more sprinkler system final inspections and sprinkler system rough­in inspections. These are going up fast. 2. Several more Fire Inspections at Market Square took place, with many noted violations in several businesses. Most common issues found would be: outdated non­working fire extinguishers, non­working illuminated exit signs and emergency lighting, non­compliant use of extension cords and power strips; fire load issues; and high piled storage issues. 3. Met with management and construction superintendent at Axel’s Restaurant about fire code issues found during the most recent inspection. Will be completing a re­check next month. 4. IWCO had two final occupancy inspections for remodel areas. 5. Met with the demo and building contractors for the Frontier Building demo and the Aldi/Venue project construction to work out the details of the demolition of the building and the start of construction. 6. Several fire sprinkler inspections out at Auto Motorplex for space remodels and additions. 7. Final fire inspections and occupancy for Kindermuzik new space. 8. Final alarm testing and occupancy for Hound Dog Pet Hotel. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, June 25, 2018SubjectFire Department UpdateSectionFIRE DEPARTMENT/LAWENFORCEMENT UPDATE Item No: F.2.Prepared By Don Johnson, Fire Chief File No: SUMMARYThe monthly update for the Chanhassen Fire Department to include call data from May 2018. BACKGROUNDFire Department StaffingStaffing is at 43 of 45 paid on­call firefighters as of the end of June. We have had some significant changes over thepast month.First off, we successfully completed the 2018 hiring process adding five new firefighters to our ranks.  Thosefirefighters began service on June 18, 2018 and were introduced to the department at the annual Black HatCeremony.  The SW fire academy will begin July 31, 2018.  One firefighter is from the Station 2 area. We also reinstated Firefighter Doug Foote on June 18, 2018 as he returned from a one­year leave from thedepartment. Doug moved back to the Station 2 area and will add personnel and experience on the west end.Additionally, Firefighter Joe Brennan, a 20­year veteran, has announced his retirement from the department effectiveJune 30, 2018.  Joe will be brought to council at some point this fall for recognition.Lastly, a 2017 probationary firefighter resigned shortly after completing training this year.  This was due to some lifechanges that included moving out of the call area. Fire Department ResponseThe fire department responded to 86 calls in May and continues to experience record level calls for service in 2018.If projections hold, we could see an increase of 13% and over 100 additional calls compared to 2017.  Duty crewsresponded to 9 calls in May and year to date a total of 49 duty crew calls for 2018 not representing a majority of theincreased call load.   Significant calls included the following:(41) EMS calls with 6 Motor Vehicle Accidents(4) Fire Responses(1) Deck Fire at Chan View Apartments(1) Mutual Aid Structure Fire to Excelsior(1) Mutual Aid Structure Fire to Victoria(1) Mutual Aid Grass Fire to Chaska(2) Citizen Complaints for Illegal Burning(3) Additional responses to Unauthorized Burning (Observed by responders)Monthly Training Training that occurred since my last update:June Officers Training­Professional Leadership DevelopmentAuto Extrication Skills TrainingOther ActivitiesApril 27­Assist to Chanhassen Elementary for their Annual Color Run EventMay 28­Assist to Chanhassen Legion Honor Guard with Memorial Day Cemetery VisitsMay 28­Staff the City Memorial Day Celebration Event with a Standby Medical CrewJune 2­Assist to Lion’s Fundraising Event at Arboretum benefiting juvenile hearing lossJune 11­Chanhassen Fire Department Annual Picnic sponsored by the Relief AssociationJune 18­Annual Black Hat Ceremony honoring Firefighters Mike Anderson, Aaron Busch, Jake Coleman, DanMartinez, and Angelo Silione for completing a two­year probationary periodUpcoming Events4th of July – We are staffing several positions on multiple days to support city events and ensure everyone has asafe visit to Chanhassen.Fire Marshal UpdateConstruction Projects of Note/Fire Inspections:1. West Park II Townhomes: several units were given final occupancy inspections with many more sprinkler systemfinal inspections and sprinkler system rough­in inspections. These are going up fast.2. Several more Fire Inspections at Market Square took place, with many noted violations in several businesses.Most common issues found would be: outdated non­working fire extinguishers, non­working illuminated exit signsand emergency lighting, non­compliant use of extension cords and power strips; fire load issues; and high piledstorage issues.3. Met with management and construction superintendent at Axel’s Restaurant about fire code issues found duringthe most recent inspection. Will be completing a re­check next month.4. IWCO had two final occupancy inspections for remodel areas.5. Met with the demo and building contractors for the Frontier Building demo and the Aldi/Venue project constructionto work out the details of the demolition of the building and the start of construction.6. Several fire sprinkler inspections out at Auto Motorplex for space remodels and additions.7. Final fire inspections and occupancy for Kindermuzik new space. 8. Final alarm testing and occupancy for Hound Dog Pet Hotel. 9. Assisted Fire Hydrant Flow testing over at Mamac for building addition. 10. Full Fire Inspections completed at Holiday Inn and the AmercInn Hotels. We do these inspections for the city as well as in conjuncture with the State Fire Marshal’s Office. 11 . A fire inspection was completed out at Camp Tanadoona for all structures on site. 12. Preschool area DHS inspection completed for St. Hubert’s School. 13. A fire code analysis and meeting was completed with CSM Corporation and a perspective new tenant due to use of High Hazard Chemicals on site and change in occupancy for the space. Fire Prevention 1. Assisted Lyman Lumber with fire drills of the business offices and lumberyard areas. 2. Fire Extinguisher Training completed at Novaspect. 3. Planning has begun for this year’s Fire Department Open House event to add some new aspects to the event. Open House will be September 24. 4. Several Fire Prevention messages went out on city social media about proper recreational fire guidelines and fire permit application information. Fire Investigations No fire investigations took place in May. ATTACHMENTS: May 2018 Graphs and Charts May Incidents on Plot Map Customer Care Cards City of Chanhassen Fire Calls for Ser vice5/1/2018 - 5/31/2018 K Fire Box Alarm Zones Calls for Serv ice North Bo x South Bo x We st Bo x Date: 6/4/2018Document Path: K:\Nick LH\Pro jects\Fire\Fo rDon\FireCa llMa ps\2 018\Ma y\Fire Incident Ma p Geocod e May 201 8.mxd Todd Gerhardt Fire Department Council Update June 25, 2018 Page 5 Citizen Evaluation Date of Call: April 27, 2018 Location of Call: Lake Drive Type of Call: Medical Crew: Lorrelle Larson, Joe LeFevere, Bryan O’Keeffe Did the fire department respond to your call in a timely manner for the circumstances? Yes Were the fire personnel that responded professional (appearance/demeanor)? Yes Were you kept informed about what was going on during the time the fire department was on scene? Yes When the fire department left the scene, were you satisfied with your experience with them? Yes Please put any comments below that explain yours answers, would help us improve future response within our community, or that you would like us to know. Efficient, effective and respectful. Appreciated your efforts very much! Date of Call: May 25, 2018 Location of Call: Powers Blvd Type of Call: Medical Crew: Daisy Anderson, Michael Anderson, Rob Frisbie, Chad Olsen, Steve Smith Did the fire department respond to your call in a timely manner for the circumstances? Yes Were the fire personnel that responded professional (appearance/demeanor)? Yes Were you kept informed about what was going on during the time the fire department was on scene? Yes When the fire department left the scene, were you satisfied with your experience with them? Yes Please put any comments below that explain yours answers, would help us improve future response within our community, or that you would like us to know. The Chanhassen Fire Dept. is second to none! Thank you Todd Gerhardt Fire Department Council Update June 25, 2018 Page 6 Date of Call: May 29, 2018 Location of Call: Pontiac Circle Type of Call: Medical Crew: Keegan Geske, Don Johnson, Joe LeFevere, Don Nutter Did the fire department respond to your call in a timely manner for the circumstances? Yes Were the fire personnel that responded professional (appearance/demeanor)? Yes Were you kept informed about what was going on during the time the fire department was on scene? Yes When the fire department left the scene, were you satisfied with your experience with them? Yes Please put any comments below that explain yours answers, would help us improve future response within our community, or that you would like us to know. Your people were very professional and nice. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 25, 2018 Subject Resolution No. 2018­37: Galpin Boulevard Study ­ Adopt Resolution in Support of Study Findings Section NEW BUSINESS Item No: I.1. Prepared By Paul Oehme, Dir. of Public Works/City Engineer File No: PW176A PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council adopts a resolution in support of the Galpin Boulevard Study findings.” Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND On November 13, 2017, the City Council approved a consultant contract with Kimley­Horn and Associates to assist the city in preparing a feasibility study and preliminary design for Galpin Boulevard between TH 5 and the north city limits. Carver County currently operates and maintains Galpin Boulevard; however, the county has identified this section of Galpin Boulevard as a potential turnback since it functions more as a local collector roadway than a county roadway. The feasibility study and preliminary design work will help determine if a turnback is in the best interest of the city. Background information on the project was previously presented to the City Council at the February 26, 2018 and May 29, 2018 work sessions. Two public open houses were held on March 22, 2018 and June 12, 2018 to receive initial stakeholder feedback and to discuss preliminary design work.  The improvements to Galpin Boulevard are currently programmed for construction in 2022. DISCUSSION Galpin Boulevard is currently a four­lane urban section roadway between TH 5 and West 78th Street, and a two­lane rural section roadway north of West 78th Street. The preliminary design study has determined that the existing roadway configuration will continue to function at an acceptable level through the design year of 2040; however, Galpin Boulevard will need to be reconstructed to the city’s current standards as a part of any turnback. In addition, the preliminary design study has determined that intersection improvements would be beneficial at some locations to address operational and safety concerns. The specific intersections of concern are as follows: West 78th Street (currently a stop control on West 78th Street) CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, June 25, 2018SubjectResolution No. 2018­37: Galpin Boulevard Study ­ Adopt Resolution in Support of StudyFindingsSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: I.1.Prepared By Paul Oehme, Dir. of Public Works/CityEngineer File No: PW176APROPOSED MOTION“The City Council adopts a resolution in support of the Galpin Boulevard Study findings.”Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDOn November 13, 2017, the City Council approved a consultant contract with Kimley­Horn and Associates to assistthe city in preparing a feasibility study and preliminary design for Galpin Boulevard between TH 5 and the north citylimits.Carver County currently operates and maintains Galpin Boulevard; however, the county has identified this section ofGalpin Boulevard as a potential turnback since it functions more as a local collector roadway than a county roadway.The feasibility study and preliminary design work will help determine if a turnback is in the best interest of the city.Background information on the project was previously presented to the City Council at the February 26, 2018 andMay 29, 2018 work sessions. Two public open houses were held on March 22, 2018 and June 12, 2018 to receiveinitial stakeholder feedback and to discuss preliminary design work. The improvements to Galpin Boulevard are currently programmed for construction in 2022.DISCUSSIONGalpin Boulevard is currently a four­lane urban section roadway between TH 5 and West 78th Street, and a two­lanerural section roadway north of West 78th Street. The preliminary design study has determined that the existingroadway configuration will continue to function at an acceptable level through the design year of 2040; however,Galpin Boulevard will need to be reconstructed to the city’s current standards as a part of any turnback. In addition,the preliminary design study has determined that intersection improvements would be beneficial at some locations toaddress operational and safety concerns. The specific intersections of concern are as follows: West 78th Street (currently a stop control on West 78th Street) Brinker Street (currently a three­way stop that is not warranted) Lake Lucy Road (current a four­way stop that is not warranted) The preliminary design concepts that have been developed for these intersections include the following: West 78th Street A roundabout is proposed at this location for traffic and pedestrian/bicycle safety and to better provide for the number of U­turns from the gas station and drug store on the east side of Galpin Boulevard. Brinker Street It is recommended that the existing three­way stop be replaced with either an enhanced pedestrian crossing with stop control on Brinker Street or with a mini roundabout. Lake Lucy Road It is recommended that the existing four­way stop be replaced with either an enhanced pedestrian crossing with stop control on Lake Lucy Road or with a mini roundabout. The preliminary design study also investigated the need for sidewalk and trail improvements along the corridor. The proposed design proposal includes 10­foot wide trails along both sides of the roadway between TH 5 and Lake Lucy Road, and a 10­foot wide trail along the east side of the roadway north of Lake Lucy Road. Right­of­way limitations and physical constraints make it very difficult to include trails along both sides of the roadway north of Lake Lucy Road. A trail on the east side of Galpin Boulevard would connect to a future City of Shorewood trail that will run along the east side of the roadway from the Chanhassen city limits to TH 7. The preliminary design study also investigated the possible construction of a trail underpass between Hunter Drive and Longacres Drive. The modification of Galpin Boulevard to an urban section roadway will require storm drainage improvements including storm sewer and stormwater treatment facilities. The preliminary design study has identified four potential locations for the stormwater treatment facilities. One of the facilities would be built on city park property, while the other three locations will require easement dedication or acquisition.   The results of the preliminary design study were presented at a public open house on June 12, 2018 at the Chanhassen Recreation Center. The meeting was well attended with over 45 attendees and comment cards were received from 17 residents. The feedback on the project was generally positive. There is support for the construction of a roundabout at West 78th Street and mini roundabouts are supported over enhanced pedestrian crossings at Brinker Street and Lake Lucy Road. The proposed trail improvements were also viewed as very favorable. The preferred concept layout for Galpin Boulevard is attached. Estimated costs have been developed for the proposed improvements to Galpin Boulevard as follows:  Estimated Construction Cost              $7,920,000 Right­of­way/Easements                    $   400,000 Indirect Costs                                      $1,670,000 Total Estimated Project Cost              $9,990,000 These estimated costs assume 2022 construction. They do not include a pedestrian underpass or any public or private utility improvements. Additional investigation will need to be completed as part of future detailed design activities to determine the extent and cost of these improvements. Carver County cost share policy indicates that the proposed City of Chanhassen cost share for the project is approximately $3,100,000. Additional discussions with Carver County are needed to determine the final cost share amount as the project proceeds. SCHEDULE Once this study is complete, staff is proposing to negotiate equitable cost participation split and turnback terms between the city and Carver County. If staff is successful in negotiating equitable costs splits and turnback terms, the City Council will be asked to consider a turnback joint powers agreement (JPA) between the two agencies. If a JPA is approved, staff can start working on securing right­of­way and programming the Galpin Boulevard improvements. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, June 25, 2018SubjectResolution No. 2018­37: Galpin Boulevard Study ­ Adopt Resolution in Support of StudyFindingsSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: I.1.Prepared By Paul Oehme, Dir. of Public Works/CityEngineer File No: PW176APROPOSED MOTION“The City Council adopts a resolution in support of the Galpin Boulevard Study findings.”Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDOn November 13, 2017, the City Council approved a consultant contract with Kimley­Horn and Associates to assistthe city in preparing a feasibility study and preliminary design for Galpin Boulevard between TH 5 and the north citylimits.Carver County currently operates and maintains Galpin Boulevard; however, the county has identified this section ofGalpin Boulevard as a potential turnback since it functions more as a local collector roadway than a county roadway.The feasibility study and preliminary design work will help determine if a turnback is in the best interest of the city.Background information on the project was previously presented to the City Council at the February 26, 2018 andMay 29, 2018 work sessions. Two public open houses were held on March 22, 2018 and June 12, 2018 to receiveinitial stakeholder feedback and to discuss preliminary design work. The improvements to Galpin Boulevard are currently programmed for construction in 2022.DISCUSSIONGalpin Boulevard is currently a four­lane urban section roadway between TH 5 and West 78th Street, and a two­lanerural section roadway north of West 78th Street. The preliminary design study has determined that the existingroadway configuration will continue to function at an acceptable level through the design year of 2040; however,Galpin Boulevard will need to be reconstructed to the city’s current standards as a part of any turnback. In addition,the preliminary design study has determined that intersection improvements would be beneficial at some locations toaddress operational and safety concerns.The specific intersections of concern are as follows:West 78th Street (currently a stop control on West 78th Street)Brinker Street (currently a three­way stop that is not warranted)Lake Lucy Road (current a four­way stop that is not warranted)The preliminary design concepts that have been developed for these intersections include the following:West 78th StreetA roundabout is proposed at this location for traffic and pedestrian/bicycle safety and to better provide for the numberof U­turns from the gas station and drug store on the east side of Galpin Boulevard.Brinker StreetIt is recommended that the existing three­way stop be replaced with either an enhanced pedestrian crossing with stopcontrol on Brinker Street or with a mini roundabout.Lake Lucy RoadIt is recommended that the existing four­way stop be replaced with either an enhanced pedestrian crossing with stopcontrol on Lake Lucy Road or with a mini roundabout.The preliminary design study also investigated the need for sidewalk and trail improvements along the corridor. Theproposed design proposal includes 10­foot wide trails along both sides of the roadway between TH 5 and Lake LucyRoad, and a 10­foot wide trail along the east side of the roadway north of Lake Lucy Road. Right­of­way limitationsand physical constraints make it very difficult to include trails along both sides of the roadway north of Lake LucyRoad. A trail on the east side of Galpin Boulevard would connect to a future City of Shorewood trail that will run alongthe east side of the roadway from the Chanhassen city limits to TH 7. The preliminary design study also investigatedthe possible construction of a trail underpass between Hunter Drive and Longacres Drive.The modification of Galpin Boulevard to an urban section roadway will require storm drainage improvements includingstorm sewer and stormwater treatment facilities. The preliminary design study has identified four potential locations forthe stormwater treatment facilities. One of the facilities would be built on city park property, while the other threelocations will require easement dedication or acquisition.  The results of the preliminary design study were presented at a public open house on June 12, 2018 at the ChanhassenRecreation Center. The meeting was well attended with over 45 attendees and comment cards were received from 17residents. The feedback on the project was generally positive. There is support for the construction of a roundabout atWest 78th Street and mini roundabouts are supported over enhanced pedestrian crossings at Brinker Street and LakeLucy Road. The proposed trail improvements were also viewed as very favorable.The preferred concept layout for Galpin Boulevard is attached.Estimated costs have been developed for the proposed improvements to Galpin Boulevard as follows: Estimated Construction Cost              $7,920,000Right­of­way/Easements                    $   400,000Indirect Costs                                      $1,670,000Total Estimated Project Cost              $9,990,000These estimated costs assume 2022 construction. They do not include a pedestrian underpass or any public or privateutility improvements. Additional investigation will need to be completed as part of future detailed design activities todetermine the extent and cost of these improvements.Carver County cost share policy indicates that the proposed City of Chanhassen cost share for the project isapproximately $3,100,000. Additional discussions with Carver County are needed to determine the final cost shareamount as the project proceeds.SCHEDULEOnce this study is complete, staff is proposing to negotiate equitable cost participation split and turnback termsbetween the city and Carver County.If staff is successful in negotiating equitable costs splits and turnback terms, the City Council will be asked toconsider a turnback joint powers agreement (JPA) between the two agencies.If a JPA is approved, staff can start working on securing right­of­way and programming the Galpin Boulevard improvements. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Roundabout Layout Alternative Comment Cards Sign­in Sheet CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: June 25, 2018 RESOLUTION NO: 2018-37 MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: APPROVE A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING STUDY FINDINGS FOR GALPIN BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN TH 5 AND THE NORTH CITY LIMITS PW176A WHEREAS, on November 13, 2017, City Council approved a consultant contract with Kimley-Horn and Associates to assist the City in preparing a feasibility study and preliminary design for Galpin Boulevard between TH 5 and the north city limits; and WHEREAS, the feasibility study and preliminary design work will help determine if a turnback of Galpin Boulevard from the County to the City is in the best interest of the City; and WHEREAS, the preliminary design work has determined that intersection improvements would be beneficial at some locations, and has recommended the need for sidewalk and trail improvements along the corridor. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The Council supports the study findings for improvements to Galpin Boulevard between TH 5 and the north city limits. 2. Authorizes City staff to negotiate with Carver County an equitable cost split between the two agencies and terms for turnback for the future improvements. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 25th day of June, 2018. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Denny Laufenburger, Mayor YES NO ABSENT MAJESTIC WAY HUNTER DR LONGACRES DRRDTOPAZ DR HARRISONLAKELAKE LUCY RD PINEHURS T D R CRESTVIE W D R W 65TH STWHITETAIL RIDGE CTMELODY H I L L R D P H E A S A N T D RGALPIN BLVD (CR 117) W 78TH ST WALNUT CURVEBRINKER ST GALPIN BOULEVARD (CR 117)RECONSTRUCTIONPROPOSED ROADWAYPLAN AND PROFILEALTERNATIVE BNORTHCARVERCOUNTY From:Oehme, Paul To:"Tim Nordberg" Subject:RE: Galpin Recon Date:Monday, June 18, 2018 10:13:00 AM Attachments:image008.png image009.png image010.png image011.png Mr. Nordberg, Thanks for your email and comment on the Galpin Blvd. Study. The proposed plan calls for installing a 5’to 6’ shoulder where possible along Galpin Blvd. This shoulder can be used for cycling. If you have additional questions please feel free to contact me. Best Regards, Paul Oehme, P.E. Public Works Director/City Engineer CITY OF CHANHASSEN PH. 952.227.1169 www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us From: Tim Nordberg Sent: Friday, June 15, 2018 8:47 PM To: Oehme, Paul <poehme@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Galpin Recon I’m sorry I missed the open house this week but wanted to ask a question or offer a suggestion. I hope Galpin can be made more bicycle friendly in this process. The current road just barely offers enough safety for road riding considering the lane width and lack of shoulder. Trails along side are appreciated, but really aren’t a good option for road cycling at any speeds. They’re better for running and cycling with families - too often intersections offer issues at road cycling speeds like cars pulling out too far and blocking the trail. Thanks! Tim Nordberg 2126 Majestic Way CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 25, 2018 Subject Avienda: Approve Final Plat and Grading Permit Section NEW BUSINESS Item No: I.2. Prepared By Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director File No: PC 2017­10 PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves the final plat and grading permit for Avienda subject to the conditions of the staff report.” Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY The applicant, Level 7 Development, LLC, is requesting final plat approval to permit grading on the site. The final plat at this time will only include dedication right of way, platting of six outlots, and placement of Outlot A, Bluff Creek Overlay District, in a conservation easement. BACKGROUND On July10, 2017, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following: Request for Preliminary Plat creating 17 lots, 3 outlots and dedication of public right­of­way for public streets (115.519 acres); and a Rezoning of 115.519 acres of property zoned Agricultural Estate District, A2, to Planned Unit Development­Regional Commercial District (PUD­RC) including Exhibit A Avienda Design Standards; and Conditional Use Permit to encroach into the primary zone and required buffer for development in the Bluff Creek Corridor; Wetland Alteration Permit to 4.897 acres of permanent wetland impacts as shown in plans dated April 14, 2017, and June 13, 2017, to request to construct into the primary zone, and required buffer for development in the Bluff Creek Corridor located at the southwest corner of Powers Boulevard and Lyman Boulevard. Final Plat The final plat includes six outlots, one of which will be dedicated to the city along with all of the public streets in the development. The request for the final plat will allow the applicant to pursue the grading permit. There will be no street or utility construction. The security being required with the development contract will be for the grading permit only. No construction can occur on the oulots as they have to be platted. The streets and the utilities must first be installed with the next phase. It is anticipated that the developer will propose some changes to the PUD as well as a phasing plan later this summer. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, June 25, 2018SubjectAvienda: Approve Final Plat and Grading PermitSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: I.2.Prepared By Kate Aanenson, CommunityDevelopment Director File No: PC 2017­10PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council approves the final plat and grading permit for Avienda subject to the conditions of the staffreport.”Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYThe applicant, Level 7 Development, LLC, is requesting final plat approval to permit grading on the site. The final platat this time will only include dedication right of way, platting of six outlots, and placement of Outlot A, Bluff CreekOverlay District, in a conservation easement.BACKGROUNDOn July10, 2017, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following:Request for Preliminary Plat creating 17 lots, 3 outlots and dedication of public right­of­way for public streets(115.519 acres); and a Rezoning of 115.519 acres of property zoned Agricultural Estate District, A2, to Planned UnitDevelopment­Regional Commercial District (PUD­RC) including Exhibit A Avienda Design Standards; andConditional Use Permit to encroach into the primary zone and required buffer for development in the Bluff CreekCorridor; Wetland Alteration Permit to 4.897 acres of permanent wetland impacts as shown in plans dated April 14,2017, and June 13, 2017, to request to construct into the primary zone, and required buffer for development in theBluff Creek Corridor located at the southwest corner of Powers Boulevard and Lyman Boulevard.Final PlatThe final plat includes six outlots, one of which will be dedicated to the city along with all of the public streets in thedevelopment. The request for the final plat will allow the applicant to pursue the grading permit. There will be no streetor utility construction. The security being required with the development contract will be for the grading permit only.No construction can occur on the oulots as they have to be platted. The streets and the utilities must first be installed with the next phase. It is anticipated that the developer will propose some changes to the PUD as well as a phasing plan later this summer. Outlot A 20.88 acres of the Bluff Creek Overlay District to Preservation Easement Outlot B Parcel of the south of Lyman Boulevard and east of Powers Boulevard Outlot C Residential Development and Office Outlot D Apartment and Retail Development Outlot E Daycare, Office and Restaurant Development Outlot F Apartments and Retail Right of Way Extension Sunset Trail, Bluff Creek Boulevard, Avienda Parkway Wetland Alteration Permit On December 18, 2017, the city approved the Wetland Alteration Permit to replace 4.4659 acres of permanent wetland impacts subject to the following conditions:  1. The approximately 20­acre Bluff Overlay District in the southwest portion of the project area be preserved in perpetuity through a conservation easement. 2. A $300,000 escrow be provided by the applicant for a future wetland/stormwater improvement project in the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed at the time of final plat.  3. Complete the Withdrawal of Banking Credits form for LGU review and signature. 4. Provide proof from Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources of withdrawal of the wetland banking credits from the banks once the withdrawal is completed. 5. Engineering plans of the design of the storm water system that meets the outcomes of the storm water model provided with the WCA application be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to grading. Grading Permit Street and utility plans are not sufficiently complete at this time for staff to recommend approval. However, the applicant has requested the city consider approving a grading permit at this time so they can start preparing the site. The city received grading and temporary drainage plans dated April 25, 2018. A slightly updated plan set was sent to the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District dated May 23, 2018.  Staff reviewed the plan set and made comments on May 3, 2018 with questions, concerns and conditions that must be met before a grading permit is recommended to be approved. These conditions are considered preliminary and subject to change with future plan update submittals. Conditions are attached to this background.  Storm Water  The applicant has submitted a permit application to the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District. It is anticipated the Watershed Board will review the application at their July meeting. Due to the complexity of the storm water system, the applicant is proposing additional time necessary for review.  The city has enlisted the assistance of WSB & Associates to review and comment on the plan. WSB has reviewed the applicant’s submitted documents and drafted review comments dated May 4, 2018, which is attached to this background. WSB also reviewed the May 23, 2018 document submittal to the watershed district which is also attached to this background. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Chanhassen City Council approve the final plat and grading plan for Avienda subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval of the Storm Water permit by the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, June 25, 2018SubjectAvienda: Approve Final Plat and Grading PermitSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: I.2.Prepared By Kate Aanenson, CommunityDevelopment Director File No: PC 2017­10PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council approves the final plat and grading permit for Avienda subject to the conditions of the staffreport.”Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYThe applicant, Level 7 Development, LLC, is requesting final plat approval to permit grading on the site. The final platat this time will only include dedication right of way, platting of six outlots, and placement of Outlot A, Bluff CreekOverlay District, in a conservation easement.BACKGROUNDOn July10, 2017, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following:Request for Preliminary Plat creating 17 lots, 3 outlots and dedication of public right­of­way for public streets(115.519 acres); and a Rezoning of 115.519 acres of property zoned Agricultural Estate District, A2, to Planned UnitDevelopment­Regional Commercial District (PUD­RC) including Exhibit A Avienda Design Standards; andConditional Use Permit to encroach into the primary zone and required buffer for development in the Bluff CreekCorridor; Wetland Alteration Permit to 4.897 acres of permanent wetland impacts as shown in plans dated April 14,2017, and June 13, 2017, to request to construct into the primary zone, and required buffer for development in theBluff Creek Corridor located at the southwest corner of Powers Boulevard and Lyman Boulevard.Final PlatThe final plat includes six outlots, one of which will be dedicated to the city along with all of the public streets in thedevelopment. The request for the final plat will allow the applicant to pursue the grading permit. There will be no streetor utility construction. The security being required with the development contract will be for the grading permit only.No construction can occur on the oulots as they have to be platted. The streets and the utilities must first be installedwith the next phase. It is anticipated that the developer will propose some changes to the PUD as well as a phasingplan later this summer.Outlot A 20.88 acres of the Bluff Creek Overlay District to Preservation EasementOutlot B Parcel of the south of Lyman Boulevard and east of Powers BoulevardOutlot C Residential Development and OfficeOutlot D Apartment and Retail DevelopmentOutlot E Daycare, Office and Restaurant DevelopmentOutlot F Apartments and RetailRight of Way Extension Sunset Trail, Bluff Creek Boulevard, Avienda ParkwayWetland Alteration PermitOn December 18, 2017, the city approved the Wetland Alteration Permit to replace 4.4659 acres of permanent wetlandimpacts subject to the following conditions: 1. The approximately 20­acre Bluff Overlay District in the southwest portion of the project area be preserved inperpetuity through a conservation easement.2. A $300,000 escrow be provided by the applicant for a future wetland/stormwater improvement project in the RileyPurgatory Bluff Creek Watershed at the time of final plat. 3. Complete the Withdrawal of Banking Credits form for LGU review and signature.4. Provide proof from Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources of withdrawal of the wetland bankingcredits from the banks once the withdrawal is completed.5. Engineering plans of the design of the storm water system that meets the outcomes of the storm water modelprovided with the WCA application be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to grading.Grading PermitStreet and utility plans are not sufficiently complete at this time for staff to recommend approval. However, theapplicant has requested the city consider approving a grading permit at this time so they can start preparing the site.The city received grading and temporary drainage plans dated April 25, 2018. A slightly updated plan set was sent tothe Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District dated May 23, 2018. Staff reviewed the plan set and made comments on May 3, 2018 with questions, concerns and conditions that must bemet before a grading permit is recommended to be approved. These conditions are considered preliminary andsubject to change with future plan update submittals. Conditions are attached to this background. Storm Water The applicant has submitted a permit application to the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District. It isanticipated the Watershed Board will review the application at their July meeting. Due to the complexity of the stormwater system, the applicant is proposing additional time necessary for review.  The city has enlisted the assistance ofWSB & Associates to review and comment on the plan. WSB has reviewed the applicant’s submitted documents anddrafted review comments dated May 4, 2018, which is attached to this background. WSB also reviewed the May 23,2018 document submittal to the watershed district which is also attached to this background.RECOMMENDATIONStaff recommends the Chanhassen City Council approve the final plat and grading plan for Avienda subject to thefollowing conditions: 1. Approval of the Storm Water permit by the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District. 2. Meet all requirements of the WCA approval.  3. Receive approval of  the plan set for grading and storm water by both the city and the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District. 4. Placement of Outlot A in a Conservation Easement. The city shall review the easement language. 5. Boundary of Outlot A shall be staked and inspected prior to grading. 6. Provide proof of withdrawal of the wetland banking credits from the banks once the withdrawal is completed. 7. Complete the Withdrawal of Banking Credits form for LGU review and signature. ATTACHMENTS: Final Plat FP Narrative WCA Notice of Decision Avienda Stormwater Reivew Conditional Approval Memo Memo plan set comments RPBCWD Permit 2018­016 Avienda Review Comments Grading Permit Grading Plans KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Level 7 Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, owner of the following described property situated in the County of Carver, State of Minnesota, to wit: Parcel A: The South Half of the Southwest Quarter (S 1/2 of SW 1/4), Section 23, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, except the following 2 described tracts: 1. Commencing at the Southwest corner of Section 23, Township 116, Range 23; thence running North on Section line 30 feet; thence in a straight line to a point on the South Section line of said Section, 30 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Section; thence West 30 feet to said Southwest corner of said Section and place of beginning, being a three cornered piece in Southwest corner of said Section 23, Township 116, Range 23; and 2. That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and the East Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, both in Section 23, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota which lies easterly of Line 2 described below: Line 2: Beginning at the south quarter corner of said Section 23; thence run west on an azimuth of 271 degrees 56 minutes 13 seconds along the south line of said Section 23 for 1634.23 feet to a point; thence on an azimuth of 00 degrees 43 minutes 24 seconds for 500.11 feet to a point; thence on an azimuth of 91 degrees 56 minutes 13 seconds for 1173.46 feet to a point; thence on an azimuth of 29 degrees 19 minutes 18 seconds for 152.11 feet to a point; thence on an azimuth of 352 degrees 57 minutes 23 seconds for 709.36 feet to a point on the north line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence on an azimuth of 91 degrees 23 minutes 02 seconds along the north line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter for 475.37 feet to the northeast corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and there terminating. Together with: Parcel B: Parcel 1: The North 420.00 feet of the East 414.86 feet of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 23, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota. Parcel 2: The NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 23, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, except for the South 658.24 feet thereof; and also except the North 420.00 feet of the East 414.86 feet thereof, Together with the benefits contained in Declaration of Easement filed March 28, 2013 as Document Number A574087. Parcel 3: The South 658.24 feet of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 23, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota. Together with: Parcel C: The Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (NE 1/4 of SW 1/4) of Section Twenty-three (23), Township One Hundred Sixteen (116) North of Range Twenty-three (23) West, Carver County, Minnesota. Except that part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (NE 1/4 of SW 1/4) of Section Twenty-three (23), Township One Hundred Sixteen (116) North, Range Twenty-three (23) West, shown as Parcel 64 on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 10-19, filed 10-19-2004 as Document No. 399300. Futher Except that part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (NE 1/4 of SW 1/4) of Section Twenty-three (23), Township One Hundred Sixteen (116) North, Range Twenty-three (23) West, shown as Parcel 16A on Carver County Right of Way Plat No. 20, approved 4-2-2013, filed 4-9-2013 as Document No. A574725. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as AVIENDA and does hereby dedicate to the public the public ways and the easements for drainage and utility purposes as shown on this plat. In witness whereof said Level 7 Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this _________ day of _______________________, 20____. LEVEL 7 DEVELOPMENT, LLC _____________________________________________ Chief Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ______________________ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of __________________________________, 20____ by ___________________________________, the Chief Manager of Level 7 Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ Notary Public, _________________ County, Minnesota My Commission Expires ________________________ I Eric B. Lindgren do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this _________ day of ___________________, 20____. _______________________________________________ Eric B. Lindgren, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License Number 48176 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ______________________ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _________ day of _________________________, 20____ by Eric B. Lindgren. _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ Notary Public, _________________ County, Minnesota My Commission Expires _________________________ CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA This plat of AVIENDA was approved and accepted by the City Council of Chanhassen, Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held on this ______ day of ____________________, 20____. If applicable, the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by the city or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations, as provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subdivision 2. CITY COUNCIL OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA By: ____________________________________________ Mayor By:_____________________________________________ Clerk COUNTY SURVEYOR, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Pursuant to Chapter 395, Minnesota Laws of 1971, this plat has been approved this ______ day of ___________________________, 20____. Brian E. Praske, County Surveyor By:____________________________________ COUNTY AUDITOR/TREASURER, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA I hereby certify that taxes payable in _____________ and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat. Dated this ______ day of _________________________, 20____. Laurie Davies, County Auditor/Treasurer By:_______________________________ COUNTY RECORDER, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA I hereby certify that this plat of AVIENDA was filed this ______ day of ____________________, 20____, at ______ o’clock ___. M. as Document No. __________________________. _____________________, County Recorder By:________________________________ NORTH 0 100 200 1 INCH = 100 FEET SCALE IN FEET NORTH 0 100 200 1 INCH = 100 FEET SCALE IN FEET Level 7 Development, LLC Chanhassen, MN FINAL PLAT FOR AVIENDA March 16, 2018 SCD14001.LEV March 16, 2018 Final Plat Narrative 2 INTRODUCTION On behalf of Level 7 Development, LLC, Landform is requesting approval of the final plat and the grading/infrastructure plans to allow mass grading of the site for construction of all public streets and associated public improvements. The final plat is consistent with the preliminary plat, rezoning to PUD, conditional use permit and wetland alteration permit approvals granted by the City Council on July 10, 2017. We were able to provide an update to the Council at their March 12th work session regarding the development approval schedule. FINAL PLAT The final plat dedicates all public right-of-way consistent with the preliminary plat approval. The remainder of the site will be platted as outlots: • Outlot A is permanent open space that will be covered by a conservation easement as required by the watershed to protect the Bluff Creek Overlay District. • Outlot B is on the east side of Powers Boulevard. This parcel is not planned to be developed as part of Avienda, but we are working with staff to discuss potential dedication to the City. • Outlots C-F are planned for development in future phases. Future phases will be platted in response to market demand. As development is planned, each of these outlots (Outlots C-F) will be platted as lots and blocks to accommodate the development as conceptually approved in 2017. As we discussed with the Council at the March 12th work session, we expect the next phase to be a plat of Outlot D to allow development of an apartment and retail. This second phase plat is planned to be submitted in June 2018. Bluff Creek Overlay District The Council approved a conditional use permit to impact Bluff Creek Overlay District (BCOD) primary and secondary zone for construction of Bluff Creek Boulevard. The area not planned for construction of Bluff Creek Boulevard will be platted as Outlot A and placed in a conservation easement. Stormwater Management The plans were designed to maintain the existing drainage patterns. Storm water improvements to serve the proposed development scenarios have been designed to and will be constructed to meet the requirements of the SWMP, RPBCWD rules, and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II storm water requirements for the site as a whole. The applicant has been working with city staff on the treatment systems for the initial infrastructure phase and currently believe this will consist of a series of underground treatment systems in either the right-of-way, within utility easements, or a combination thereof. We are submitting to Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District for approval of a stormwater permit concurrent with this plat application. The watershed has additional requirements beyond the City SCD14001.LEV March 16, 2018 Final Plat Narrative 3 requirements and we will be working with the city and watershed in the coming weeks to refine our plans to meet the intent of both jurisdictions. We know that stormwater management is a critical component for all developments, but especially one of this size. Our development schedule is based on the published schedule from both the watershed and the City, but we know that the watershed sometimes takes longer than the standard review period. That is why cities commonly grant plat approval contingent upon watershed approval. We ask that the Council make watershed approval a condition of this plat approval, so that we can work to execute all required documents and be prepared to begin work upon watershed approval, even if the watershed approval lags behind Council approval. Wetlands – Wetland Alteration Permit A wetland delineation was completed for the property and the LGU (City of Chanhassen) concurred with the delineation. Wetlands 3, 4, 6 and 10 will be preserved and will comply with the wetland buffer requirements. We will mitigate the wetland impacts off-site through the use of wetland banking credits. Infrastructure Improvements Approval of this final plat will allow us to begin construction of the public infrastructure. We will be working with City staff to finalize the construction drawings, but intend to begin grading and constructing public infrastructure this spring/early summer. Development Contract We have been working with City staff to prepare the development contract and finalize fees (both amounts and timing) for this multi-phase development. We are hopeful that we will be able to work with staff to review a draft development contract in April so that it can be finalized for this phase prior to Council action on May 14th. SUMMARY We look forward to Council approval of the final plat and master development contract at the May 14th City Council meeting, so that we might begin construction of Avienda this spring. CONTACT INFORMATION This document was prepared by: Kendra Lindahl, AICP Landform 105 South Fifth Avenue, Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Any additional questions regarding this application can be directed to Kendra Lindahl at klindahl@landform.net or 612.638.0225. BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 1 of 3 Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision Local Government Unit (LGU) City of Chanhassen Address 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 1. PROJECT INFORMATION Applicant Name Level 7 Development, LLC (c/o Mark Nordland) 8315 Cascade Drive – Suite 165 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Project Name Avienda Date of Application March 14, 2017 Application Number 07-01WRP Attach site locator map. Type of Decision: Wetland Boundary or Type No-Loss Exemption Sequencing Replacement Plan Banking Plan Technical Evaluation Panel Findings and Recommendation (if any): Approve Approve with conditions Deny Summary (or attach): The TEP met on November 20, 2017. The TEP reviewed the request for sequencing flexibility. Based on the requirements in MR8420.0520 Subp 7a, the TEP agreed the application met the requirements for sequencing flexibility. An email from Ben Carlson (BWSR) is attached. TEP Findings of Fact are also attached. 2. LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT DECISION Date of Decision: December 18, 2017 Approved Approved with conditions (include below) Denied 1. The approximately 20-acre Bluff Overlay District in the southwest of the project area be preserved in perpetuity through a conservation easement. 2. A $300,000 escrow be provided by the applicant for a future wetland/stormwater improvement project in the city. 3. Complete the Withdrawal of Banking Credits form for LGU review and signature. 4. Provide proof of withdrawal of the wetland banking credits from the banks once the withdrawal is completed. 5. Engineering plans of the design of the stormwater system that at least meets the outcomes of the stormwater model provided with the WCA application be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to grading. LGU Findings and Conclusions (attach additional sheets as necessary): BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 2 of 3 A. Overview of Project Level 7 Developm ent, LLC, has applied for a W etland Conservation Act (W CA) perm it with the City of Chanhassen as the Local Governm ent Unit (LGU) for the W CA for the proposed Avienda project. T he project is a 115-acre developm ent project for a Regional Lifestyle Center . The developer is proposing to im pact 4.5878 acres of W CA regulated wetland. There is also 1,429 square feet of waterway im pact, but this is not regulated b y W CA as it is not a W CA wetland. Wetland mitigation is proposed through the purchase of wetland bank credit. Three banks and one back-up bank have been identified. These banks are within the same Bank Service Area (BSA) as the project. 1. Applicant subm itted application Februar y 15, 2017 with prelim inary storm water m odel ing inform ation on F ebruar y 21, 2017. (Wetland Permit Application, January 12, 2017). 2. City determ ined application was incom plete on March 10, 2017. This determ ination was reviewed with the applicant on March 9, 2017. (WSB Memo dated March 10, 2017). 3. Applicant subm itted revisions on March 14, 2017. (Kjolhaug memo dated March 14, 2017). 4. City determ ined the application was com plete on March 17, 2017. A W etland Conservation Act Notice of Application (NOA) was sent to the TEP on March 17, 2017. While the application was technically complete, the NOA and Application checklist indicated that the applicant may want to provide additional supporting information to allow the LGU to review the application for conformance with WCA. (WCA Notice of Application dated March 17, 2017). 5. T he first 60-day tim eline ended Ma y 13, 2017. The LGU extended that tim eline in writing for 60 additional days. The LGU indicated that if the applicant wanted to extend the timeline again, the Cit y needed this extension in writing. The following summarizes the subsequent extensions. Date of Extension Notice Date Extension Expires First 60-Day Timeline May 13, 2017 Second 60-Day Timeline – April 21, 2017 July 12, 2017 June 19, 2017 September 10, 2017 September 6, 2017 October 10, 2017 October 3, 2017 December 10, 2017 November 20, 2017 February 8, 2018 6. On June 5, the applicant submitted information to the US Army Corps of Engineers (COE) and copied the City in response to the COE comments. (Kjolhaug memo dated June 5, 2017 with attachments). 7. The TEP, City staff, applicant, and staff from Riley -Purgatory Bluff Creek met on July 11, 2017 to review the application and project. (The TEP includes staff from the Board of Water and Soil Resources, the Soil and Water Conservation District, and the LGU. The purpose of the TEP is to provide guidance on WCA items, if requested by the LGU to do so). As a result of that meeting, information was clarified by the applicant. The LGU and TEP indicated they were still awaiting other information. The meeting notes from that meeting are attached. (WSB Memo Dated July 21, 2017 and Revised August 1, 2017 to reflect review and comment of the meeting attendees). 8. The applicant submitted additional information to the City on the October 9, 2017 with revised project plans. The project proposes to im pact 4.5878 acres of wetland. This is a reduction of 0.309 acres of impac t from the original application. (Kjolhaug memo dated October 9, 2017). BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 3 of 3 T able 1. Summary of Proposed Wetland Impacts Wetland Number Wetland Type Wetland Acreage Impact Acreage (fill and excavate) Fill or Excavate Wetland Management Class Wetland 1 1, 3 1.1001 1.1001 F Manage 2 Wetland 1/2 1, 2 0.1860 0.1860 F Manage 2 Wetland 2 1, 2, 5 2.2569 2.2569 F Manage 2 Wetland 3 1 0.6696 0 NA Manage 2 Wetland 4 1 0.1253 0 NA Manage 2 Wetland 5 1 0.3483 0.3483 F Manage 3 Wetland 6 1 0.5302 0.4986 F Manage 2 Wetland 6 1 0.2514 0 Manage 2 Wetland 7 1 0.0150 0.0150 F Manage 3 Wetland 8 1 0.0844 0.0844 F Manage 3 Wetland 9 1 0.0985 0.0985 F Manage 3 Wetland 10 1 0.0740 0 NA Preserve TOTAL 5.6406 4.5878 9. On October 26, 2017, the applicant submitted a revised application to the US Corps of Engineers (COE) pertaining to reduced jurisdictional status of the COE wetlands as well as reduced wetland impacts. This submittal contained the grading plan which also informed the WCA review. (Kjolhaug memo dated October 26, 2017). 10. On November 20, 2017, the applicant submitted a request and supporting information for sequencing flexibility within the WCA rules. This submittal, along with the October 9, 2017 memo responding to the TEP meeting from July and a memo dated June 5, 2017 responding to COE comments, was provided to the TEP and other s for review and comment on November 20, 2017. Revised stormwater modeling and analysis accompanied this memo. (Kjolhaug memo dated November 20, 2017 ; Draft Stormwater Management Plan – DP5.5 dated November 20, 2017 ). 11. On November 30, 2017, members of the TEP and City staff met to review the sequencing flexibility request. At this meeting, the TEP reviewed and discussed that the applicant appeared to meet the sequencing flexibility in WCA and acknowledged that the project was still out for comments and the stormwater review was still pending from the City. An email from BWSR staff is attached to this memo that documents BWSR’s comments on the application and that they support the sequencing flexibility application. (Email dated December 1, 2017 from Ben Car lson, BWSR TEP member). 12. A revised draft stormwater management plan and model was provided for review on December 11, 2017 based on questions from WSB during the review period. (Draft Stormwater Management Plan – DP5.5 dated December 11, 2017 ). 13. Comments were received from the Riley -Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD) on December 7, 2017. (Riley-Purgatory Bluff Creek letter dated December 7, 2017). 14. A response from the applicant was received on December 13, 2017 in response to RPBCWD comments. (Larkin Hoffman memo dated December 13, 2018). B. WCA Review and Findings 1. Wetland Boundary, T ype and Classification: The LGU reviewed the wetland delineation, typing, and MnRAM classifications. This inform ation is summ arized below. The LGU and T EP concurred with the wetland delineation, wetland t yping, and MnRAM classifications as noted below and in the application. BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 4 of 3 T able 2. Wetland Type and M anagement Classification Summary 2016 Application City's Plan 2014 Report Cowardi n Ci rcul ar 39 Manage me nt Cl ass Manage me nt Cl ass Cowardin Circular 39 Wetl and 1 PEMAd T1 M2 M2 PEMB T2 PEMCd T3 Wetl and 2 PUBG T5 M2 M2 PEMB T2 PEMBd T2 PUBFx T4 PEMAd T1 Wetl and 3 PEMA T1 M2 M3 PEMB T2 Wetl and 4 PEMAd T1 M2 PEMB T2 Wetl and 5 PEMAd T1 M3 PEMA T1 Wetl and 6 PEMAd T1 M2 M2 PFO1A T1 Wetl and 7/8 PEMAd T1 M3 Wetl and 9 PEMAd T1 M3 Wetl and 10 PFO1A T1 P Findings: The LGU and TEP concur with the wetland boundary, type, and management classification as outlined in the current application and summarized in the Table 2. 2. Sequencing Flexibility The applicant has requested sequencing flexibility pursuant to Minnesota Ru les 8420.0520 Subp 7a. Flexibility in application of the sequencing steps (i.e. avoid and minimize impacts) may be allowed at the discretion of the Local Government Unit subject to one of the following conditions. If sequencing flexibility is allowed, the requirements of MR 8420.0520 Subp 1-7 that require specific avoidance and minimization criteria do not apply. Below is a review of whether the applicant has met one of these conditions to be eligible for sequencing flexibility. Subpart 7a. A.1. Sequencing flexibility can be allowed by the LGU if the wetland impacted has been degraded to the point where replacement of it would result in a certain gain in function and public value. Findings: A Minnesota Routine Assessment Method (MnRAM) assessmen t is a State approved method for evaluating the functions and values of wetlands. Based on the results of a MnRAM assessment, wetlands are classified as Preserve, Manage 1, Manage 2, or Manage 3, with the highest functions and values in the Preserve category and the lowest functions and values in the Manage 3 category. The MnRAM assessment has been completed for the on -site wetlands as well as the proposed wetland bank wetlands, which are proposed for wetland mitigation. Some of the on-site wetlands (Wetlands 1, 2, 5, 9) have been degraded from agricultural activities and apparent manipulation such as grading (as evidenced from the aerial photos). The on-site wetlands are Manage 2s and 3s as noted in the Table 2 above. The MnRAM assessments of the wetland bank sites show that the proposed wetland replacement is of better function and value than wetlands proposed to be impacted. The wetland bank sites are ranked as Preserve. The TEP concurred that, based on the MnRAM assessments, the replacement wetlands would result in a gain in function and value within the same Bank Service Area (BSA). This meets the requirements of WCA so sequencing flexibility is met. While the WCA requires wetlands to be replaced in the same Bank Service Area and the project meets this requirement, the city acknowledges lost functions and values within the City of Chanhassen. Therefore, the C ity is requiring an escrow of $300,000 to fund a future wetland/water quality project in the city. Three possible projects have been identified at this time. Subpart 7a.A.2. Sequencing flexibility can be allowed by the LGU if avoidance of a wetland would result in severe degradation of the wetland’s ability to function and provide public value. This could occur if surrounding land uses or implementation of BMP’s cannot reaso nably maintain the wetland’s ability to provide functions and values. BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 5 of 3 Findings: While some information related to the difficulty to maintain the existing function and value of the on-site wetlands was alluded to in the original application (Page 19 of January 12, 2017 application), the applicant has not supplied further documentation regarding this item. Therefore, this item does not apply. Subpart 7a.A.3. Sequencing flexibility can be allowed by the LGU if the only feasible and prudent upland site available for the project or replacement has greater ecosystem function and public value than the wetland. This may be appropriate only if the applicant demonstrates impact minimization to the wetland agrees to perpetually preserve the designated update site, and completely replaces the impacted wetland’s functions and values. Findings: There is a, approximately 20-acre high quality wooded area in the southwest portion of the project site. The area is designated as the Bluff Creek Overlay District (BCOD). This area provides ecosystem value to the area by protecting the bluff and providing a high quality, vegetated wooded area that contains a diversity of native vegetation (red and bur oak, sugar maple, basswood, American elm, and black cherry that appear to hav e not been clear cut based on aerial photos that go back to 1940. The area will be placed into a perpetual conservation easement to preserve it in perpetuity. Additionally, alternatives supplied by the applicant indicate alternative sites either have simil ar or potentially greater ecosystem impact. The TEP concurred with this finding and this project meets the requirements of WCA for sequencing flexibility for this subpart. Subpart 7a.A.4. Sequencing flexibility can be allowed by the LGU if the wetland i s a site where human health and safety is a factor. Findings: Health and human safety of the wetlands being impacted is not a factor. This condition does not apply. Subpart 7a.B. Flexibility in the order and application of sequencing standards must not b e implemented unless alternatives have been considered and the proposed replacement wetland is certain to provide equal or greater public values. Findings: In the February 15, 2017 documentation, the applicant provides an alternatives analysis that look s at alternative locations within the city as well as alternative configurations for development within the chosen project site. In sections 5.2 and 5.3 of the Avienda Wetland Permit Application dated January 12, 2017 (and resubmitted February 15, 2017), two avoidance alternatives are provided. One is the no-build and the other is a development plan that avoids wetland impacts. The applicant also provided alternative site alternatives. The alternative sites either had similar impacts or greater impacts to wetlands or natural resources. Alternatives have been considered. Regarding if the replacement wetland, as stated in B.2 above, the applicant has completed MnRAM assessments of the on-site and replacement wetlands. The information has been reviewed by the TEP. The information indicates that the replacement wetlands will provide greater function and value than the existing wetlands within the same BSA. The applicant will also provide a $300,000 escrow to fund a future wetland/water quality project within the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek watershed. Additionally, the stormwater management plan has been reviewed. Based on the review of the Draft Stormwater Management Plan – DP5.5 dated November 20, 2017, there were questions regarding the nondegradation analysis and the hydrology analysis for some of wetlands. These questions were brought to the applicant and changes were made to the design. Based on the review of the Draft Stormwater Management Plan – DP5.5 dated December 11, 2017, these questions were addressed. This review has taken into account the hydrology impacts and water quality impacts on the remaining wetlands (Wetland 3, 4, and 6) as w ell as the downstream MnDOT wetlands. Based on the stormwater management plan, the project plan will not negatively impact the remaining on -site or downstream MnDOT wetlands from a hydrological or water quality perspective. It is important to note that BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 6 of 3 this review was based on WCA requirements, and not requirements that may need to be met by other permitting agencies. Therefore, this subpart of the sequencing flexibility has been met. Water Quality and Nondegradation The project area is within the Lake Sus an watershed and the Bluff Creek watershed. These receiving waters are listed as impaired and as such need to show the project meets nondegradation standards. While detailed engineering design plans have not been provided, the modeling of the design plans indicates the project will meet the nondegradation requirements. The engineering plans will need to meet the results provided in the model. The data below is based on WSB’s review of the model. LAKE SUSAN City's Non-Degradation Summary Proposed Site Information Subwatershe d Name Subwatershe d Area Subwatershe d Max Allowable Subwatershed Average Flow Estimate of Area within Subwatershed* Max Allowable Flow within P8 Surface Outflow** [ac][ac-ft][ac-ft per ac][ac][ac-ft][ac-ft] LS 2-1 28.96 42.1 1.45 30.7 44.6 LS 2-2 51.03 68.4 1.34 5.4 7.2 LS 2-4 57.39 41.5 0.72 3.6 2.6 TOTALS 39.7 54.5 13.03 Meeting Requirement BLUFF CREEK City's Non-Degradation Summary Proposed Site Information Subwatershe d Name Subwatershe d Area Subwatershe d Max Allowable Flow 2020 Subwatershed Average Flow Estimate of Area within Subwatershed* Max Allowable Flow within Subwatershe P8 Surface Outflow** [ac][ac-ft][ac-ft per ac][ac][ac-ft][ac-ft] BC-A5.11 102.15 148.6 1.45 50.3 73.2 BC-A5.2 35.38 49.8 1.41 16.2 22.8 BC-A5.7 53.75 51.6 0.96 4.5 4.3 TOTALS 71 100.3 10.41 Meeting Requirement *Estimates were determined from georeferencing documents into ArcGIS and should not be considered exact ** Determined only comparing the surface outflow and using the reported drainage areas from page 8 of the stormwater management plan LAKE SUSAN City's Non-Degradation Summary Proposed Site Information Subwatershe d Name Subwatershe d Area Subwatershe d Max Allowable TSS 2020 Subwatershed Average TSS Estimate of Area within Subwatershed* Max Allowable TSS within Subwatershe P8 Surface Outflow TSS** [ac][lbs][lbs per ac][ac][lbs][lbs] LS 2-1 28.96 10967 378.69 30.7 11625.9 LS 2-2 51.03 17605 344.99 5.4 1863.0 LS 2-4 57.39 10252 178.64 3.6 643.1 TOTALS 39.7 14132.0 356.1 Meeting Requirement BLUFF CREEK City's Non-Degradation Summary Proposed Site Information Subwatershe d Name Subwatershe d Area Subwatershe d Max Allowable TSS 2020 Subwatershed Average TSS Estimate of Area within Subwatershed* Max Allowable TSS within Subwatershe d P8 Surface Outflow TSS** [ac][lbs][lbs per ac][ac][lbs][lbs] BC-A5.11 102.15 38263 374.58 50.3 18841.2 BC-A5.2 35.38 12876 363.93 16.2 5895.7 BC-A5.7 53.75 13017 242.18 4.5 1089.8 TOTALS 71 25826.7 522.2 Meeting Requirement *Estimates were determined from georeferencing documents into ArcGIS and should not be considered exact ** Determined only comparing the surface outflow and using the reported drainage areas from page 8 of the stormwater management plan BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 7 of 3 Hydrology Based on a review of the hydrology imp acts (see table below), the project will not significantly alter or negatively impact the hydrology of the remaining on - site wetlands (Wetland 3, 4, and 6) nor the downstream MnDOT wetlands. It should be noted that Wetland 3 is proposed to have a culvert o utlet placed at the elevation of the existing wetland (about 921). In practice, the wetland is expected to remain at that elevation or up to one foot about that elevation. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to negatively impact the hydrology of the wetland. LAKE SUSAN City's Non-Degradation Summary Proposed Site Information Subwatershe d Name Subwatershe d Area Subwatershe d Max Allowable TP 2020 Subwatershed Average TP Estimate of Area within Subwatershed* Max Allowable TP within Subwatershe P8 Surface Outflow TP** [ac][lbs][lbs per ac][ac][lbs][lbs] LS 2-1 28.96 36.7 1.27 30.7 38.9 LS 2-2 51.03 59.4 1.16 5.4 6.3 LS 2-4 57.39 34.8 0.61 3.6 2.2 TOTALS 39.7 47.4 4.9 Meeting Requirement BLUFF CREEK City's Non-Degradation Summary Proposed Site Information Subwatershe d Name Subwatershe d Area Subwatershe d Max Allowable TP 2020 Subwatershed Average TP Estimate of Area within Subwatershed* Max Allowable TP within Subwatershe d P8 Surface Outflow TP** [ac][lbs][lbs per ac][ac][lbs][lbs] BC-A5.11 102.15 128.4 1.26 50.3 63.2 BC-A5.2 35.38 43.1 1.22 16.2 19.7 BC-A5.7 53.75 44 0.82 4.5 3.7 TOTALS 71 86.6 6.9 Meeting Requirement *Estimates were determined from georeferencing documents into ArcGIS and should not be considered exact ** Determined only comparing the surface outflow and using the reported drainage areas from page 8 of the stormwater management plan BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 8 of 3 C. Approval and Conditions Based on the review of the project for conformance with the Wetland Conservation Act, the project meets the requirements for sequencing flexibility. The City Council approved this application and replacement plan with the conditions below. These conditions must be met before wetland impact can occur: 1. The approximately 20-acre Bluff Overlay District in the southwest of the project area be preserved in perpetuity through a conservation easement. 2. A $300,000 escrow b e provided by the applicant for a future wetland/stormwater improvement project in the city. 3. Complete the Withdrawal of Banking Credits form for LGU review and signature. Existing Conditions Proposed Conditions Change 2-year 10-year 2-year 10-year 2-year 10-year [cfs][cfs][cfs][cfs][cfs][cfs] Wetland 6 6.66 18.19 7.02 19.17 0.36 0.98 Wetland 3 9.36 19.05 9.29 17.06 -0.07 -1.99 Wetland 4 31.63 62.79 16.01 41.71 -15.62 -21.08 Downstream Wetland (MNDOT M9)84.57 174.15 56.81 158.25 -27.76 -15.90 Downstream Wetland (MNDOT M10)20.86 54.97 20.59 53.65 -0.27 -1.32 Existing Conditions Proposed Conditions Change 2-year 10-year 2-year 10-year 2-year 10-year [af][af][af][af][af][af] Wetland 6 0.79 1.86 1.46 2.95 0.67 1.09 Wetland 3 0.74 1.45 0.77 1.40 0.02 -0.05 Wetland 4 3.18 6.06 4.09 6.64 0.92 0.58 Downstream Wetland (MNDOT M9)11.84 22.39 11.94 23.27 0.10 0.88 Downstream Wetland (MNDOT M10)9.26 18.41 10.36 20.14 1.10 1.73 Existing Conditions Proposed Conditions Change NWL 2-year HWL 10-year HWL NWL 2-year HWL 10-year HWL NWL 2-year HWL 10-year HWL Wetland 6 884 885.35 885.49 884 885.47 885.64 0.00 0.12 0.15 Wetland 3 920.80 921.68 921.97 920.80 921.36 921.63 0.00 -0.32 -0.34 Wetland 4 884.03 884.71 884.92 884.03 884.54 884.79 0.00 -0.17 -0.13 Downstream Wetland (MNDOT M9)869.50 870.49 871.29 869.50 870.49 871.33 0.00 0.00 0.04 Downstream Wetland (MNDOT M10)891.00 891.68 892.56 891.00 891.78 892.70 0.00 0.10 0.14 Existing Conditions Proposed Conditions Change 2-year event 10-year event 2-year event 10-year event 2-year event 10-year event Wetland 6 1.35 1.49 1.47 1.64 0.12 0.15 Wetland 3 0.88 1.17 0.56 0.83 -0.32 -0.34 Wetland 4 0.68 0.89 0.51 0.76 -0.17 -0.13 Downstream Wetland (MNDOT M9)0.99 1.79 0.99 1.83 0.00 0.04 Downstream Wetland (MNDOT M10)0.68 1.56 0.78 1.70 0.10 0.14 Existing Conditions Proposed Conditions Change 2-year event 10-year event 2-year event 10-year event 2-year event 10-year event [hr][hr][hr][hr][hr][hr] Wetland 6 12 13 14 14 2.00 1.00 Wetland 3 23 24 23.00 24.00 Wetland 4 13 14 19 20 6.00 6.00 Downstream Wetland (MNDOT M9)187 213 211 243 24.00 30.00 Downstream Wetland (MNDOT M10)194 227 198 233 4.00 6.00 *Criteria used to determine duration: Start at the time elevation goes above the NWL Duration continues until elevation returns to within one tenth of a foot above the NWL Inflow Volume Discharge Rates Entering Wetlands Bounce Duration* Water Levels Bounce BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 9 of 3 For Replacement Plans using credits from the State Wetland Bank: Bank Account # 1494 - Drummer 1605 – Schmidgall 174 – Ryan 1636 – Kremer (back up bank) Bank Service Area BSA 9 BSA 9 BSA 9 BSA 9 County Blue Earth Stevens Rice Lyon Credits Approved for Withdrawal (sq. ft. or nearest .01 acre) 261,360 sf 108,900 sf 65,000 sf TOTAL: 435,260 sf. This is more credit than the 399,689.12 sf needed. The applicant will need to submit corrected and updated Bank Withdrawal forms reflecting the 399,689.12 sf of banking credits. Replacement Plan Approval Conditions. In addition to any conditions specified by the LGU, the approval of a Wetland Replacement Plan is conditional upon the following: Financial Assurance: For project-specific replacement that is not in-advance, a financial assurance specified by the LGU must be submitted to the LGU in accordance with MN Rule 8420.0522, Subp. 9 (List amount and type in LGU Findings). Deed Recording: For project-specific replacement, evidence must be provided to the LGU that the BWSR “Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants” and “Consent to Replacement Wetland” forms have been filed with the county recorder’s office in which the replacement wetland is located. Credit Withdrawal: For replacement consisting of wetland bank credits, confirmation that BWSR has withdrawn the credits from the state wetland bank as specified in the approved replacement plan. Wetlands may not be impacted until all applicable conditions have been met! LGU Authorized Signature: Signing and mailing of this completed form to the appropriate recipients in accordance with 8420.0255, Subp. 5 provides notice that a decision was made by the LGU under the Wetland Conservation Act as specified above. If additional details on the decision exist, they have been provided to the landowner and are available from the LGU upon request. Name Andrea Moffatt Title Senior Environmental Scientist Signature Date 12/22/2017 Phone Number and E-mail 763-287-7196 amoffatt@wsbeng.com THIS DECISION ONLY APPLIES TO THE MINNESOTA WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT . Additional approvals or permits from local, state, and federal agencies may be required. Check with all appropriate authorities before commencing work in or near wetlands. 4. Provide proof of withdrawal of the wetland banking credits from the banks once the withdrawal is completed. 5. Engineering plans of the design of the stormwater system that at least meets the outcomes of the stormwater model provided with the WCA application be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to grading. BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 10 of 3 Applicants proceed at their own risk if work authorized by this decision is started before the time period for appeal (30 days) has expired. If this decision is reversed or revised under appeal , the applicant may be responsible for restoring or replacing all wetland impacts. This decision is valid for three years from the date of decision unless a longer period is advised by the TEP and specified in this notice of decision. 3. APPEAL OF THIS DECISION Pursuant to MN Rule 8420.0905, any appeal of this decision can only be commenced by mailing a petition for appeal, including applicable fee, within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of the mailing of this Notice to the following as indicated: Check one: Appeal of an LGU staff decision. Send petition and $ fee (if applicable) to: Appeal of LGU governing body decision. Send petition and $500 filing fee to: Executive Director Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 4. LIST OF ADDRESSEES SWCD TEP member: afinke@co.carver.mn.us BWSR TEP member: ben.carlson@state.mn.us LGU TEP member (if different than LGU Contact): DNR TEP member: Becky.Horton@state.mn.us DNR Regional Office (if different than DNR TEP member) WD or WMO (if applicable): kwold@barr.com, cbleser@rpbcwd.org, tjeffery@rpbcwd.org Applicant and Landowner (if different) Melissa@kjolhaugenv.com; plarson@larkinhoffman.com; mnordland@launchproperties.com; mkjol@kjolhaugenv.com; ssabraski@landform.net Members of the public who requested notice: Corps of Engineers Project Manager Ryan.M.Malterud@usace.army.mil BWSR Wetland Bank Coordinator (wetland bank plan decisions only) 5. MAILING INFORMATION ➢ For a list of BWSR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/workareas/WCA_areas.pdf ➢ For a list of DNR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.mn.us/wetlands/wca/DNR_TEP_contacts.pdf ➢ Department of Natural Resources Regional Offices: NW Region: Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Div. Ecol. Resources 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd. NE Bemidji, MN 56601 NE Region: Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Div. Ecol. Resources 1201 E. Hwy. 2 Grand Rapids, MN 55744 Central Region: Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Div. Ecol. Resources 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, MN 55106 Southern Region: Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Div. Ecol. Resources 261 Hwy. 15 South New Ulm, MN 56073 For a map of DNR Administrative Regions, see: http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/aboutdnr/dnr_regions.pdf ➢ For a list of Corps of Project Managers: www.mvp.usace.army.mil/regulatory/default.asp?pageid=687 or send to: US Army Corps of Engineers St. Paul District, ATTN: OP-R 180 Fifth St. East, Suite 700 St. Paul, MN 55101-1678 ➢ For Wetland Bank Plan applications, also send a copy of the application to: BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 11 of 3 Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Wetland Bank Coordinator 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 6. ATTACHMENTS In addition to the site locator map, list any other attachments: TEP Findings of Fact and BWSR email Signed City Resolution  Table 1. Revised Wetland Impact Summary for USACE Regulated Impacts Wetland Revised Proposed Impact (ac) Impact Type USACE Regulated USACE Regulated Impact (ac) Wetlands 1 1.1001 Fill No 0Wetland 1/2 0.1860 Fill No 0Wetland 2 2.2569 Fill No 0Wetland 4 -- -- Yes 0Wetland 5 0.3483 Fill No 0Wetland 6 0.4986 Fill Yes 0.4986Wetland 7 0.0150 Fill No 0Wetland 8 0.0844 Fill No 0Wetland 9 0.0985 Excavate No 0Total 0.4986 Figure 1 - Site Location & Property Boundary Avienda Mixed Use Regional/Lifestyle Center (KES 2015-030)Chanhassen, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 750 Feet Legend Property Boundary MnDOT ROW (adjacent to site) Source: MnGeo, ESRI Imagery Basemap Residential Development Residential Development ResidentialDevelopment Trunk Highway 212Lyman Boulevard Powers BoulevardParcel within property boundary (1.66-ac). Not proposed for development at this time. 916914 912 918920 910908906 9 0 4 902 900898 896894 892890888 886884 922924926928930882932880934936946 878 938 940 876 942 944 874 872 870948 950952954956958 890 89492 8 916 944 920898934 9428789 0 0946924 950 902 938934936 914 930910884 916926936 912932 916954 920932 952 9308749069 2 4 922 918 950 938 934 908892 932 916 914 886 876936 896 934 906942 930 918940 912 904946 926 930 940 874 9 2 4 918938 910 900910906 938 948 914 872 936898 9 0 6 928 9049149149 2 6940 902924928 934874934952948 918914 954 930916896 920946 944 896912900888 936908 9108 8 4924938 8929 2 2 944 912 91 6 902894 928926 904 902932 898922 938 920870Figure 3 - Topographic Elevations (2016 Metro Aerial) Avienda Mixed Use Regional/Lifestyle Center (KES 2015-030)Chanhassen, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 250 Feet Legend Proposed Site Wetlands MnDOT Wetland Waterway Intermittent Drainageway Ag Tile Carver Co 2-ft Lidar Source: MnGeo, ESRI Imagery Basemap 950-ft 924-ft 908-ft 912-ft 938-ft 932-ft932-ft894-ft886-ft926-ft 930-ft910-ft906-ft906-ft 900-ft892-ft924-ft 914-ft936-ft 8 8 6 - f t 876-ft 916-ft9 0 0 - f t 902-ft946-ft912-ft930-ft946-ft 936-ft 902-ft Figure 4 - Minor Watershed Boundaries (2016 Metro Aerial) Avienda Mixed Use Regional/Lifestyle Center (KES 2015-030)Chanhassen, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 250 Feet Legend Proposed Site Wetlands MnDOT Wetland Waterway Intermittent Drainageway Minor Watershed Divide Source: MnGeo, ESRI Imagery Basemap WL6 WL3 2016 WL9 WL5 WL4 WL2 WL1WL1/2 WL7 WL8 WL10 Lake Susan &Riley CreekWatershed Bluff CreekWatershed Source: www.mngeo.state.mn.us Figure 5 - Existing Drainage Areas (2016 Metro Aerial) Avienda Mixed Use Regional/Lifestyle Center (KES 2015-130)Chanhassen, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 250 Feet Legend Proposed Site Drainage Areas (DA) Sub Drainage Area (SDA) Surface Drainage Direction Wetlands MnDOT Wetland Source: MnGeo, ESRI Imagery Basemap WL6 DA17.48-ac WL1/2 DA31.12-ac WL8 DA3.85-ac WL7 DA4.81-ac DA2.56-ac WL3 DA7.14-ac WL5 DA5.55-ac DA12.61-acDA28.83-ac DA3.62-ac DA2.36-ac WL9 SDA3.36-ac WL10 SDA0.55-ac WL4 SDA1.14-ac 12/18/17 701 Xenia Avenue South | Suite 300 | Minneapolis, MN 55416 | (763) 541-4800 Building a legacy – your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer | wsbeng.com K:\011517-000\From -To\Data\5.23.18 submittal\011517-000 Avienda Stormwater Review 053018.docx Memorandum To: Paul Oehme, PE Vanessa Strong From: Jeff Sandberg, PE Kendra Fallon, EIT Date: May 31, 2018 Re: Avienda Stormwater Management Review WSB Project No. 011517-000 The following documents were submitted by Landform on May 24th, 2018 and were reviewed against the City of Chanhassen (City) requirements: · 2018-05-23 Full Plan Set · 2018-05-23 Response to Watershed Comments · 2018-05-23 Transmittal · Avienda Infiltration Areas Ultimate 2018-05-23 · Avienda MNRAMs; dated 12/09/16 · Avienda Stormwater Narrative 2018-05-23 · ZRC_DP18_-_Combined_Drainage_Calc; dated 09/26/05 · Avienda -DP 6.4 – Phase I; undated · Avienda DP 6.4 – Ultimate; undated · Avienda – Existing; undated · Avienda – ZRC Design Check; undated · Phase 1 Bluff Creek; undated · Phase 1 Lake Susan; undated · Ultimate Bluff Creek; undated · Ultimate Lake Susan; undated · Outlet Test; undated Comments were provided to the Applicant on May 4th, 2018 but a response letter was not received. The following comments were either unaddressed from the previous comment memo, or are additional comments from the submittal on May 24th, 2018. General 1. An NPDES Permit will need to be obtained prior to the start of construction and submitted to the City for their records. 2. An operations and maintenance plan for the stormwater system should be included in future submittals for Phase I development. As individual lots are developed to ultimate build out conditions, operations and maintenance plans for individual properties will be required. Wetland Conservation Act Compliance 1. It appears that the rates and volumes of runoff to the wetlands have decreased (and in one instance increased) in the Phase I and the Ultimate condition compared to what was approved in the WCA application. This could represent a change in increased impacts to the wetlands, but it is unclear in the submittal. Please provide a table that compares what was approved in the WCA application for existing and proposed conditions to what is currently being proposed, both in Mr. Paul Oehme and Ms. Vanessa Strong May 31, 2018 Page 2 K:\011517-000\From -To\Data\5.23.18 submittal\011517-000 Avienda Stormwater Review 053018.docx Phase I development and Ultimate buildout, for the 2-year and 10-year events for rate, volume, bounce, and duration of bounce so this can be adequately reviewed. If the existing condition assumptions have changed, an explanation needs to be provided. 2. Wetland 3 was previously modeled (in the HydroCAD dated 12/11/17 included with the wetland permit application) under existing conditions to have an asymmetrical weir at an elevation of 921.9. The Existing conditions model submitted on 5/24/18 sets the asymmetrical weir at an elevation of 920.58. Applicant should update the most recent model to what was shown in the 12/11/17 model, or provide an explanation for why the weir elevation has been changed. 3. In the Ultimate buildout HydroCAD model submitted on 5/24/18, the 12” culvert outlet from Wetland 3 is set at 920.58. However, in the HydroCAD model submitted with the wetland permit application (dated 12/11/17) the 12” culvert outlet was set at 920.80. Applicant should update the most recent model to set the culvert at 920.80, as was approved in the wetland application. 4. In the submitted ‘2018-05-23 Response to Watershed Comments’ document, there are multiple references to spot elevations being added to the existing topography map. However, these spot elevations cannot be found. Please update the Existing Conditions Plan (Page C1.1) with the spot elevations or provide the referenced existing topography map in future submittals. 5. There are inconsistencies in the drainage areas modeled in P8 versus what is mentioned in the SWMP that fall within the subwatersheds used in the non-degradation study. See the table below for values modeled and values mentioned in the SWMP which are tributary to Lake Susan and Bluff Creek. Applicant should be modeling the entire drainage area on the project site tributary to Lake Susan and Bluff Creek in P8. Drainage Area (DA) Tributary to: DA mentioned in SWMP [ac] DA modeled in P8 for Phase I conditions [ac] DA modeled in P8 for Ultimate buildout conditions [ac] Lake Susan 39.525 37.3 38.7 Bluff Creek 80.34 51.1 50 Phase I Mass Grading, Drainage, & Erosion Control Plan 1. The plans currently show proposed slopes with a grade steeper than 3:1 on the east side of Triangle Basin. Applicant should regrade contours so no slopes steeper than 3:1 are proposed. 2. Add the EOF location and elevation for each of the basins to the grading plans. 3. The side slopes noted on the Basin Cross Sections page do not match what is called out on the grading plans for several of the basins. Additionally, what is called out on the grading plans does not match the contours drawn for several of the basins. Applicant should update the Basin Cross Sections page as well as the grading plans so the side slopes noted on the cross sections match with both the slopes called out on the grading plan and the contours drawn. 4. Smooth out all wavy proposed contours shown throughout the project site so they are constructible. Round out pond corner contours to reflect what will be constructed. 5. Correct grading issue on north side of the Bluff Creek Blvd East Public Interim Infiltration Basin so slopes are not steeper than 3:1. 6. Move the A-A and B-B cross section lines for the South Center Temporary Basin so they are shown in the accurate location as to what is shown on the Basin Cross Sections page. Storm Sewer Plan and Profile 1. Storm sewer connecting CBMH 133 to CBMH 132 is missing in profile view. Additionally, structures OCS 419 and FES T20 are missing in their respective profiles. 2. Manholes have not been sized properly. Applicant should update the manholes and confirm they are the correct size for the pipes coming in and out of the structure at the specified angles. 3. It is recommended the applicant look through the storm sewer layout for possible areas to reduce the number of structures and/or pipes. Possible areas where structures or pipes could be removed include: · Structures CBMH 314, CDS 321, and CBMH 322 · Structures CBMH 417, CDS 435, and STMH 436 · Structures STMH 412 and STMH 413 · Pipe connection between STMH 418 and STMH 422 Mr. Paul Oehme and Ms. Vanessa Strong May 31, 2018 Page 3 K:\011517-000\From -To\Data\5.23.18 submittal\011517-000 Avienda Stormwater Review 053018.docx · There may be other areas not listed above. Applicant should look through entire storm sewer layout for possible areas to reduce number of structures and/or pipes. 4. Portions of Bluff Creek Boulevard and Avienda Parkway are shown to have two paralleling runs of storm sewer on the same side of the road. Applicant should confirm all of the proposed storm sewer is needed and look through the layout to see if any of the paralleling runs of storm can be combined into one. 5. Storm sewer should be designed so the crown elevation for pipes match when possible. 6. Numerous structures do not have labels in plan view. Applicant should update the plans to confirm all structures have labels in plan view. 7. There is storm sewer shown running parallel to STMH 701 to FES 700 which is not labeled and is not shown in profile view. Applicant should either remove this storm sewer or label it and provide the profile view. 8. Pipes shown on page C5.9 are shown with a 0% slope. Applicant should update the plans so storm sewer meets the MnDOT minimum grade requirements in order to maintain a velocity of 3 feet per second under full flow to reduce risk of sedimentation within pipes. 9. On unlabeled pages 48 and 50 of the 50-page plans, pipes and structures are shown unlabeled and have no size, slope or invert information. Applicant should update plans to confirm all storm sewer and structures are labeled properly (as well as the plan sheet titles). 10. Storm sewer running from OCS 600 to STMH 111 is shown to daylight in between the two structures. Applicant should update the grading plans or the storm sewer so the pipe does not daylight in between the two structures. 11. Several structures in profile view are shown not reaching the proposed finished grade. Applicant should update the plans, and structure rim elevations if required, so structures will be constructed to reach the surface elevation. 12. Update storm sewer profile titles to be consistent with the storm sewer profiles they are showing. Move the titles so that all callouts on the profiles can be read. 13. Flared end sections 230 and 750 are not shown to daylight in the profile view. Applicant should update the grading or the storm sewer so that the flared ends will daylight. 14. Structure STMH 501 is labeled as a ‘Cylindrical Junction Structure NF’. Applicant should update the structure label with the structure size. 15. Applicant should confirm structure STMH 315 should be a manhole and not an outlet control structure. 16. Structure CBMH 424 is missing the structure size within the label. 17. Remove the structure size in the label for structure FES 601. 18. The proposed ground profile should continue over the profile view of structures FES 504 to STMH 501. 19. Add callout for minimum 1.5’ separation between watermain and storm sewer on unlabeled page 49 of the 50-page plans. 20. In the ‘Pervious Pavement’ section of the submitted SWMP, the applicant states “Owe have assumed that stormwater from non-pervious pavement will be intercepted prior to reaching each pervious pavement area.” As each lot is developed, the applicant should demonstrate that this assumption is correct. 21. The Minnesota Stormwater Manual recommends a 10-foot setback from pervious pavement to buildings. As each lot is developed, the applicant should confirm that this recommendation is met. Civil Construction Details 1. The following details should be included in future submittals: a. FES Detail b. OCS Detail; include table with referenced elevations for each OCS otherwise a separate detail for each OCS is required c. Details for all storm sewer crossings should be provided to confirm there is adequate vertical space between pipes. 2. Update references throughout profile views to the correct City detail numbers included in the plan’s Civil Construction Details. Applicant should update the details to the most up to date City details found on the City’s website. Note that the following details are no longer included in the City’s details: a. Detail number 2103 - Sanitary Sewer Outside Drop Manhole b. Detail number 5508 – Insulation Detail Mr. Paul Oehme and Ms. Vanessa Strong May 31, 2018 Page 4 K:\011517-000\From -To\Data\5.23.18 submittal\011517-000 Avienda Stormwater Review 053018.docx c. Detail number 3104 – Catch Basin Manhole with Sump HydroCAD Model 1. The 48-hour drawdown requirement is not being met by most basins under Phase I or Ultimate buildout conditions. Applicant must update the plans and models so that all basins will drawdown with 48 hours. 2. The West South-Temp Basin has a broad-crested rectangular weir outlet modeled with a discharge multiplier of 50 in the Phase I model. Applicant should update the model to remove this discharge multiplier. 3. Several nodes for the northwest corner of the site in the Phase I and Ultimate buildout models use HSG D soils even though Existing Drainage Map shows the area contains HSG B soils. Applicant should update the models to be consistent with both the soils map provided and with one another. 4. The Avienda Pkwy – SE Basin and Avienda Pkwy – NE Basin have starting elevations that differ from the outlet elevation in the Phase I model. Applicant should update the ponds so the starting elevation is equal to the outlet elevation, or provide an explanation for why the starting elevation should differ from the outlet elevation. 5. Several inconsistencies between what is shown in the plans and what is being included in the Phase I and Ultimate models were found during the review. The comments below note the inconsistencies that were found during the review, however all basin outlets should be checked for consistency between the plans and the models. Note that the term ‘models’ is used in the following sub-comments and refers to the Phase I and Ultimate buildout models. a. East Pond Outlet: The models have an 84” vertical orifice. Applicant should confirm this is not supposed to be a horizontal orifice. If the 84” orifice is referencing the top grate on the structure, it should be updated to a horizontal orifice and changed to a 96” opening to match the structure size labeled in the plans. Additionally, the Ultimate buildout model has the vertical orifice routed to a 54” culvert and the Phase I model simply has the vertical orifice. Applicant should confirm the Phase I model is not supposed to also have the 54” culvert. b. North Central Temp Pond: Modeled with a 12” RCP outlet with an invert at 909 but the plans show a 24” RCP outlet with an invert at 913.17. c. Avienda NW Basin: Modeled with a 12” RCP outlet with an invert at 912.77 but the plans show a 21” RCP outlet with an invert at 912.7. d. West-North Temp Basin: Modeled with a 12” RCP outlet but the plans show at 21” RCP outlet. e. West-South Temp Basin: Modeled with a 0.19% sloped outlet but the plans show a slope of 0.5%. f. South-Temp Basin: Modeled with a 12” RCP outlet with an invert at 897.07 but the plans show a 15” RCP outlet with an invert at 895.76. g. South Center-Temp Basin: Modeled with a 12” RCP outlet with an invert at 891 but the plans show a 15” RCP outlet with an invert at 891.96. h. Triangle Basin: Modeled with a 15” RCP outlet but there is no storm sewer outlet shown on the plans. i. Bluff Creek-East Basin: Culvert outlet modeled with an invert at 900.42 and a slope of 0.25% but the plans show an invert of 900.35 and a slope of 0.96%. j. Central North-Temp Basin: Modeled with an 18” RCP outlet but the plans show a 15” RCP outlet. k. Central South-Temp Basin: Modeled with an 18” RCP outlet but the plans show a 15” RCP outlet. l. East Central-Temp Basin: Modeled with a 24” RCP outlet with a slope of 0.45% but the plans show a 30” RCP outlet with a slope of 0.87%. m. Avienda SE Basin: Modeled with a 12” RCP outlet with an invert at 906.17 but the plans show a 24” RCP outlet with an invert at 904.65. n. Avienda NE Basin: Modeled with a 12” RCP outlet with a slope of 1.1% but the plans show an 18” RCP outlet with a slope of 2.0%. i. Additionally, OCS 419 is not shown in profile view so the invert elevation for the outlet cannot be verified. Mr. Paul Oehme and Ms. Vanessa Strong May 31, 2018 Page 5 K:\011517-000\From -To\Data\5.23.18 submittal\011517-000 Avienda Stormwater Review 053018.docx o. Wetland 3: The storm sewer outlet pipe is unlabeled in the storm sewer profiles so the model cannot be verified. p. Bluff Creek-West Basin: The storm sewer outlet pipe is unlabeled in the storm sewer profiles so the model cannot be verified. Storm Sewer Design Calculations 1. Storm sewer design calculations must be provided for all storm sewer shown on the utility plans. It appears that storm sewer labeled in the 500s, 600s and 700s are all missing from the storm sewer design calculations. Applicant should confirm all storm sewer shown on the utility plans are included in the storm sewer design calculations. 2. There are many inconsistencies between what is shown on the utility plans and profiles and what is listed in the storm sewer design calculation spreadsheet provided. Applicant should update the plans and spreadsheet so they are showing the same pipe designs. Compensatory Floodplain Storage 1. The applicant should provide additional information for where the compensatory floodplain volumes in Table 17 of Appendix F are coming from. a. If they are taken from HydroCAD, the applicant should update the table to be consistent for what is shown in HydroCAD. Additional contours should be added to the necessary ponds in HydroCAD to confirm the values shown in Table 17. b. If they were taken from CAD, the applicant should submit the existing and proposed (Phase I and Ultimate buildout) contour CAD files to confirm the values shown in Table 17. Temporary Sedimentation Basins 1. In the updated plans, the ‘Temporary Basin Calculations’ table was removed. Applicant should include this table with future submittals to confirm the temporary sedimentation tables are being sized properly. 2. Add a note to the plans describing how the basins will be brought back to their original design contours at the end of construction if they are proposed to be used in the Ultimate buildout design. 3. It is recommended OCS T10 is moved to the southwest corner of the ‘South Center’ temporary basin to reduce the risk of short circuiting. We request that the applicant respond by restating each comment and stating how each comment was addressed. Please reach out with any questions. 701 Xenia Avenue South | Suite 300 | Minneapolis, MN 55416 | (763) 541-4800 Building a legacy – your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer | wsbeng.com K:\011517-000\Admin\Docs\Conditional Approval Memo_061218.docx Memorandum To: Paul Oehme, City of Chanhassen From: Jeff Sandberg Kendra Fallon Date: June 12, 2018 Re: Conditional Approval Memo for Avienda Development Permit Application WSB Project No. 011517-000 The most recent submittal by Landform was received on May 23rd,2018 and was reviewed for conformance with the City of Chanhassen (City) requirements and for compliance with what was approved under the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) review of the Avienda Development. We recommend that any approvals be conditioned on satisfying the following: 1. All comments must be addressed from the Stormwater Management Review dated May 31st, 2018 from WSB & Associates. 2. Engineering plans and modeling must be provided that meets the outcomes of the stormwater model provided with the project’s WCA application per the conditional approval of the WCA permit by the City. 3. Applicant shall secure W atershed District approval. MEMORANDUM TO: Steve Sabraki, PE Landform FROM: Paul Oehme, Dir. of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: May 3, 2018 SUBJ: Avienda Preliminary Plan Review This Memorandum serves as revised and updated comments from the draft memorandum dated April 27th that was reviewed and discussed at the April 27th progress meeting. The City received updated plan sets for the proposed Avienda development on April 25, 2018. These plan sets are not signed and are considered not complete at this time. The City however has completed a preliminary review of the plans and offers the following general comments. These comments shall not be considered final comments. The City will have additional comments when the plan set is more complete. No work on the site shall commence until all necessary approvals have been obtained and fees paid. Comments on Civil and Landscape Plan Set dated April 25, 2018: Sheet C2.1 - a. Verify Primary and Secondary Bluff Creek Overlay District location. b. Show location of proposed public storm water features and easements. c. Define green space (landscape area) d. If development identification sign will be installed in right of way or easements, an encroachment agreement must be obtained. Sheet C2.2 - a. Show proposed pavement and trail sections b. Show insets as required. c. Are there any necessary soil corrections? d. Recommended pavement section: e. Verify pavement section with soils report. f. Roadway section shall include drain tile. g. Slope outside of right of way shall be 1:3 Max. h. Are there any know areas where soil corrections are necessary within the proposed right of way? i. All disturbed areas within right of way shall receive 6” topsoil. j. Identify proposed restoration for medians and boulevards. k. Identify restoration for all other disturbed areas. Sheet C3.1 - a. Slopes shall be a max of 1:3. b. Label all slopes greater than 1:5. c. Proposed grading compaction and testing plan shall be submitted to City for review and approval. d. Highlight existing contour numbers on sheets C3.1A – C3.1D. e. Permanent slopes shall have a minimum of 6” topsoil. f. Stockpile topsoil areas shall have a maximum slope of 1:2. g. Drainage and utility easements will be required over all public temporary basins. h. A vegetation and weed control management plan will be needed for the outlots until they are developed. It is recommend all slopes 1:3 have erosion control blankets. Sheet C3.1A- Proposed grading along western project limits north of Mills Road is unclear. Including cross sections in the plan set of this area is recommended. This area will need to be changed to eliminate or reduce the size of the berm. This area may need a storm sewer system. Developer shall work with property owners to improve grading and drainage in this area. Sheet C3.1B- Drainage swales appear to be very steep. These areas are recommended to include erosion control blankets. Sheet C3.1C- The east swale contour lines to the central south temporary basin do not appear to correct. The east swale contour lines to the south east temporary basin do not appear to be correct. Sheet C3.1D – a. No Tree Removals are allowed within Outlot A Bluff Creek Overlay District b. The volume of storm sewer discharge to wetland 4 does not appear to be acceptable. Sheet C3.3 - a. It is recommended to add a sheet showing the sodded areas and the different seeding areas. b. If temporary or permanent stormwater basins/features will be exposed during construction, they must be protected by sediment controls (silt fence, etc.). c. Include phasing language for all stormwater treatment features within SWPPP. d. ALL stormwater basins and treatment features must be protected with sediment controls and pond/infiltration basin side slopes must stabilized within 7 days of completion using erosion control blanket or equivalent. e. Any permanent stormwater basins and features that will be used as temporary sediment basins during construction must be sealed (not allowed to discharge turbid water from the site) until final completion/site stabilization. f. As-Builts are required on ALL permanent stormwater treatment features (BMPs) Infiltration test results required on ALL infiltration features at final project completion. g. Provide details and cross-section for all permanent stormwater treatment features (infiltration/filtration/stormwater ponds/etc.) h. Include inspection schedule during construction (Permit requires inspections every 7 days AND within 24 hours after every .5 rain event in 24 hours) City water resources staff must be notified BEFORE any dewatering activity occurs. i. SWPPP must include names and contact information for certified inspectors once chosen and before construction begins. Sheet C4.1 - a. Overall utility layout sheet is unreadable at current scale when printed at full size plan sheet. b. Suggest having utility plan sheets scale at 1”-60’ at half size prints. Utility Note 8 shall read “Install tracker wire with all non-conductive utilities per City specification. Sheet C5.1 – C5.3 a. Minimum public storm sewer pipe size is 15” RCP. b. Storm sewer inside top of pipe shall be at the same elevation where pipe diameters change along pipe run. c. Label class of storm sewer pipe on each pipe segment. d. Show roadway draintile, connections and cleanouts. e. Out fall velocity at all FES’s shall not be more than 5 fps. f. Call out all cubic yards of rip rap to be installed at each outfall. Sheet C5.4 - a. Show other utilities on profile. Highlight actual storm sewer line on plan sheet shown on profile. b. Show roadway profileSTMH 415 should be moved outside of the roadway pavement. c. STMH 414 should be moved outside of the roadway pavement. d. STMH 416 should be moved outside of the roadway pavement. e. STMH 418 should be moved outside of the roadway pavement. General Sewer and water plan sheet notes: a. Line weight for watermain is poor and should highlight utilities better. b. Label all gate valves, sizes, stations location and offset from centerlines c. Label all fittings, sizes, stations and offsets from centerline. d. Label all hydrants, stations, offset from centerline, fittings, length of hydrant lead pipe and pipe material. Also, call out the hydrants top nut elevation. e. Call out size of all watermain stubs. f. Proposed sewer SDR class shall be shown on all pipe segments on profile. g. Try to avoid designing sewer pipe to minimum grade. Example, try to have all 8” sanitary sewer at least at 0.50% grade. Sheet C5.5 - a. Show sanitary sewer pipe grades. b. What is sanitary sewer flow velocity in NW Outlet area? The pipe grade may have to be reduced. Sheet C5.6 - a. Show roadway vertical curve information and centerline grades. b. Show stationing in plan view. Sheet C5.7 - a. Show roadway vertical curve information and centerline grades. b. Show stationing in plan view. Sheet C5.8 - a. Show roadway vertical curve information and centerline grades. b. Plan for watermain stub at about Station 19+50 for trunk loop connection to Lyman and Powers watermain. Sheet C5.9 - a. Show roadway vertical curve information and centerline grades. b. What is sanitary sewer flow velocity in NW Outlet area? The pipe grade may have to be reduced. Sheet C 7.5 - Add ADA ramp detail sheets. Sheets L2.1A- L2.1C- a. Include Master planting schedule. b. Include only planting schedule per sheet. c. Landscaping plan will need to be more detailed in right of way and roundabouts. d. If irrigation is planned in easements and right of way an encroachment agreement will be required. e. Developer and future business, HOA(s) will be responsible for maintenance of Boulevard trees and landscaping. f. The developer will need to work with the City on a right of way maintenance agreement. g. Suggest moving trees to outside of right of way and in drainage and utility easement. h. Remove plantings in splitter islands at roundabouts between the pedestrian crossing and the roundabout circle. State Aid my not approve these plantings. Sheet x1 of 86 a. Vertical curve from station 10+25 to 15+50 must change to remove the low point. b. Show roadway vertical curve information and centerline grades. Sheet x2 of 86 Show roadway vertical curve information and centerline grades. Sheet x3 of 86 Show watermain and sanitary sewer on profile. Plan stationing does not match profile stationing. Street light design will need to be submitted for approval. Comments on street plan set by Toole Design Group dated 03/02/2018. Title Sheet Needs to follow MnDOT State Aid title sheet requirements, there are a number of things missing. See MnDOT Website for State Aid plan requirements. Typical Sections a. Missing proposed pavement sections b. Provide a soils recommendation letter/report. c. Are there any necessary soil corrections? If so, the typical sections should show this information d. Slopes shall be a max of 1:3 e. Reverse all slope labels (i.e. 4:1 should be 1:4) Alignment Plan and Tabulation (Not submitted) a. Need to include an alignment plan and tabulation detailing all alignment information including stationing, coordinates, and curve data b. We can’t verify that the alignment meets design requirements without this information. Existing Conditions Plans (Not submitted) No existing conditions information is included in the plans Construction Plans - Roadway a. Missing information including construction limits, taper lengths and rates, notes, and a legend b. Need to show turn lane improvement changes on Powers Boulevard. c. Pavement marking plan sheets will be required. d. Signage plan will be required. e. ADA plan sheets will be required. f. MnDOT will require a SWPPP Erosion Control plan. g. Pedestrian enhanced crosswalk will be required at Lyman Blvd. Construction Plans - Utilities (Not submitted) a. Storm sewer will need to be shown on MSA plan set since this will need to generate State Aid needs. b. Detail proposed storm sewer including manhole locations, pipe sizes and grades, connections to existing system, ponding locations, and profiles. Intersection Details (Not submitted) a. Detail intersection layouts, pedestrian ramp locations, spot elevations, ADA compliance b. Need to show specific spot grades to verify design. Profiles a. Show existing grades at the beginning and end of profiles. b. Show any proposed subgrade excavation and label grading grade c. Show any areas of proposed soil correction d. EB Bluff Creek profile is flat (0.53%) between Station 31+50 and 35+00. Can this be increased to a minimum of 1%? Cross Sections a. Show proposed right-of-way b. Include bar scales c. Label proposed profile grade information d. Why steeper than 1:3 slopes at some locations? e. Reverse all slope labels (i.e. 4:1 should be 1:4) General Comments – Road Design a. Station 28+00 to 31+00 – there is an awkward lane drop and a lane shift in this area. b. Station 35+00 to 39+00 – why is there a 20’ wide through lane (12’ wide lane + 2-4’wide shoulders) in this location? General Comments – Roundabout a. The westbound approach to the roundabout at Station 27+00 gets pretty narrow. No dimensions are provided, but it looks like the approach should be wider. b. The entry and exit curves at the roundabouts are pretty abrupt and most of the deflection is provided by the center island. There are opportunities to use the same circle size and create a smoother roundabout design that will provide additional refuge space for pedestrians at crossings. c. The designer should run Autoturn through the roundabouts and provide this information for review. What design vehicle did the designer assume? From:Scott Sobiech To:"Chris Call, PE"; Steven Sabraski Cc:"Claire Bleser (cbleser@rpbcwd.org)"; tjeffery@rpbcwd.org; Strong, Vanessa; Oehme, Paul; Scott Sobiech Subject:RE: RPBCWD Permit 2018-016: Avienda Review Comments3 Date:Tuesday, June 5, 2018 6:18:31 AM Attachments:image001.png image003.png image004.png image005.png Chris and Steve, The RPBCWD received your revised submittal for the proposed Avienda Development plan in Chanhassen on May 23, 2018. The application is complete as of May 23rd. A review of the May 23rd responses and revised submittal has generated the following questions or comments. Review comments to your responses are provided in red. If an item is listed as CLOSED the response satisfied the comment. If it is listed as “OPEN” additional information is needed. Review of the May23rd information has generated additional rule specific comments as provided below. Most of the items listed below will need to be addressed before a recommendation can be made to the RPBCWD Board of Managers. Please let us know if you would like to meet to discuss the comments. 1. Cross Sections for the underground rock galleries and pervious paver areas are needed to support the ultimate condition scenario. Without information we are unable to validate the rate control, abstraction, and water quality modeling. Landform Response: See J22 response below. CLOSED - Details provided on C7.5 2. Detailed utility drawings for Phase 1 showing the outlet control structures and piping for all temporary and permanent storm sewer systems and basins. (e.g, the plan and profile drawings and the utilities do not contain information for the outlets from the basins including NW Pond, East Pond, or any of the temporary basins) Without this information, the modeling cannot be verified and compliance with rate control, abstraction, and water quality cannot be assessed. Landform Response: See J10 response below. OPEN - The outlet control structures used in the Phase 1 HydroCAD modeling do not appear to match in theinformation shown on the plans or is missing. See comment J26 below. Please revise drawings to includeeach OCS for the permanent and temporary BMPs. This could also be provided with a typical outlet detail accompanied by a table of relevant dimensions and elevations on the drawings. 3. The revised submittal indicates property ownership information was provided by the developer. I may have missed itbut to knowledge the RPBCWD has not received the supporting information requested in the following comment: a. The application indicates the property is owned by Mr. Bahram Akradi which does not align with the information on the Caver County Property website. The website indicates the property is owned by LEVEL 7 DEVELOPMENT LLC. Please provide written confirmation that Mr. Bahram Akradi is an authorized representative of LEVEL 7 DEVELOPMENT LLC. Landform Response: Documentation indicating Bahram Akradi as an authorized representative was submitted via email an deemed acceptable 5/21/2018. CLOSED-Email and Memo provided 5/21 Because the project involves work below the 100-year flood elevation of a waterbody (wetlands 1, 2, 5, 8 & 9), the project must conform to the requirements in the RPBCWD Floodplain Management and Drainage Alterations rule (Rule B, Subsection 2.1). To conform to the RPBCWD Rule B the following revisions are needed: B1. The locations of the flared end sections on the utility drawings (2018-04-24 Bluff Creek Utility Plans SCD14001.pdf) appear to suggest that the end sections will be place at or very near the delineated wetland boundary of wetland 3, 4 and 6. Because this is somewhat different than the information shown on thegrading plan it is difficult to know which design is being proposed. However any riprap placed at the FESoutlets would be within the wetlands and the 100-year floodplain. Placement of fill below the 100-year floodelevation is prohibited unless fully compensatory storage at the same elevation (+/- 1 foot) and within thefloodplain of the same waterbody is provided (Rule B Subsection 3.2). Landform Response: FES outlets and riprap has been relocated outside of the delineated wetland boundary. CLOSED- While FES have been relocated, the EC plans show discharging upslope from NWL without permanent erosion protection between the point discharge and the waterbody. Therefore the plans must be revised to show permanent erosion protection, including supporting computations. B2. Table 17 provides information about filling below the 100-year flood elevation for Wetlands 1, 2 and 8. However, there also appears to be filling of wetland #6. Computations must be provided showing the compensatory storage for Wetland #6. B3. Please provide a map illustrating the extends of filling below the 100-year floodplains for Wetlands 1, 2, 8 and6. B4. Because the project proposed to alter surface flows below 100-year floodplain for Wetlands 1, 2, 6 and 8 which impacts the surface flows leaving the site, conformance with Rule B Subsection 3.3 must be demonstrated. Filling of the wetland to facilitate site development and providing alternative storages areaswill impact the timing and duration of flows leaving the site. To demonstrate that the alterations will not havean adverse offsite impact and will not adversely affect flood risk, basin or channel stability, groundwaterhydrology, stream baseflow, water quality, or aquatic or riparian habitat the following information is needed a. Appendix H provides a non-degradation summary based on P8 modeling relative to the City’s maximum allowable runoff. The City’s maximum allowable runoff does not adequately satisfy the requirement that there will be no adverse impact on water quality. Rather the comparison must be made between existing and phase 1 as well as existing and ultimate development. This could be demonstrated by matching the flow-duration curve rate to within 10 percent of the existing discharges from 10 percent of the 2-year peak flow rate to the 10-year peak flow rate to mitigate increased duration of discharge post development can have on off site creek flows (Bluff andRiley Creek). b. Maintain existing flood elevations for the 2, 10, and 100 year events for Wetlands 3, 4, 6 andMnDOTor demonstrate the change in elevation will not impact flood risk to existing adjacentstructures. Based on the information in Appendix H it appears the 1,2, 10, and 100-yr flood elevation for wetland 3 all increase, thus increasing the flood risk for the adjacent structures. The change in flood risk to Powers Boulevard must also be assessed. c. Demonstrate that design maintains existing wetland hydrology to maintain to not adversely affect the existing functions and values. While appendix H discusses wetland hydrology on a design event basis it does not assess the majority of storms that occur during a given year. (ie, roughly 90% of event are less than a 1-year event). In addition, the information does not address the duration of changed design event flooding as recommended by BWSR’s Wetland Management Classification System http://bwsr.state.mn.us/wetlands/mnram/MnRAM_Wetland_Mgmt_Classification_Guidance.pdf. One suggested method to demonstrate conformance would be to use the flow duration approach based on King County, WA guidelines: i. Total volume of water into a wetland during a single precipitation event should not be more than 20% higher or lower than the pre-project volumes ii. Total volume of water into a wetland on a monthly basis should not be more than 15% higher or lower than the pre-project volumes Because the project will involve 113 acres of land-disturbing activity, the project must conform to the requirements in the RPBCWD Erosion and Sediment Control rule (Rule C, Subsection 2.1). To conform to the RPBCWD Rule C the following revisions are needed: C1. Redundant perimeter protection (e.g., double rows of silt fence) is needed between the land disturbing activities and MNDOT Wetland M09. Landform Response: We have added double silt fence along Wetland M09. CLOSED C2. RPBCWD standard erosion control note 34 related to decompaction on sheets C3.1, 3.1A-3.1D must be revised to remove “(8 inches for single family home properties)” because this is not applicable to the proposed development. Landform Response: The note has been revised. CLOSED C3. The name and contact information of the general contractor responsible for the site must be provided (this information does not need to be provided prior to making a recommendation to the RPBCWD Board). Landform Response: Acknowledged. OPEN – Will be included as recommended condition of approval C4. The revised plans show several flared end sections discharging upslope from the NWL and above the wetland boundaries (e.g., wetland #6 and wetland #4). The plans must be revised to incorporate permanent erosion protection downslope from the riprap to ensure no erosion of the slopes. Supporting computation must also be provided demonstrating adequate permeant erosion protection is provided downgradient of the riprap at all FES discharging at an elevation higher than the NWL or basin bottom. Because the proposed work triggers RPBCWD’s Floodplain Management (Rule B) and Stormwater ManagementRules (Rule J) and Wetlands 3, 4, 6, and MNDOT Wetland M09 are downgradient of the activities, Rule D, Subsections 2.1a and 3.1 require buffer around these wetlands. To conform to the RPBCWD Rule D the following revisions are needed: D1. The WCA Notice of Decision clearly delineates the MNDOT Wetland M09.The wetland function and values assessment using MnRAM is needed for the downgradient wetland MNDOT Wetland M09 to determine the value of the buffer according to Appendix D1 of Rule D, the buffer location and the required average/minimum widths. Because this wetland is located offsite the applicant can submit the best available data to support a determination. Based on information available to the District it appears that the City of Chanhassen has assigned a Preserve” rating to this wetland. Based on this information and without a MnRAM for this wetland immediately adjacent to the parcel, the wetland should be assumed to be exceptional value and require an 80 foot average, 40 foot minimum buffer width. Landform Response: The MnRAM analysis is has been submitted and indicates the wetland to be a RPBCWD Wetland Rating “Medium” with a 40’ average and 20’ minimum buffer width. CLOSED- Provided MNRAM for MnDOT wetland -Medium Value wetland requiring 40 foot average, 20 minimum buffer widths. D2. While the response to comments suggest information was provided on sheets C2.1A-D, thus sheets were not included in the submittal for review. In addition, it is unclear based on the information on sheet C2.1 what is buffer area and there does not appear to be the required buffer signs for any of the regulated wetlands. The buffer area and signage location must be clearly shown on the plans. Landform Response: Buffer markers have been located along the regulated wetlands on sheet C2.1 OPEN- The line type and shading on sheet C2.1 are not defined. In addition, buffer averaging computations have not been provided to demonstrate conformance with Rule D, subsection 3.1e. Map C2.1 needs to be revised to clear call out wetland boundary, minimum and average buffer widths provided as well as provide buffer averaging computations per 3.1e. The line work on sheet C1.1 indicated a “20’ Wetland Buffer (Typ.)” or “30' WETLAND BUFFER SETBACK (TYP)” for Wetlands 1 & 2 which will be filled. The 20’buffer width does not match those required for the medium value wetlands remaining onsite and the adjacent MNDOT wetland. Please clarify and revise to show the correct buffer widths from RPBCWD criteria. D3. The buffer must be indicated by permanent, free-standing markers at the buffer’s upland edge, in material conformity with a design and text provided by the District. A marker must be placed along each lot line, with additional markers at an interval of no more than 200 feet or where the buffer changes direction. The location of the markers must be provided on the plans. I was unable to identify this information on sheet C3.1 as suggested in the response to comments. Landform Response: Buffer markers have been located along the regulated wetlands on sheet C2.1 OPEN - The buffer must be indicated by permanent, free-standing markers at the buffer’s upland edge, placed along each lot line, with additional markers at an interval of no more than 200 feet or where the buffer changes direction. Plans must be updated to include markers at property boundaries. D4. It appears the trail and Bluff Creek Boulevard south of wetland 3 may extend within the buffer area. It is difficult to confirm the statement that the roadway is not within the buffer because the buffer limits and signage locations are not clearly shown on the plans. While a trail for nonmotorized use is allowable with in the buffer, the impervious surface of the trail should not be included in the buffer averaging computations used to determine that the minimum required buffer is provided. Please clearly show the buffer boundaries and provide buffer-averaging computations to support the minimum and average buffer width provided for each wetland (Wetlands 3, 4, 6, and MNDOT Wetland M09). Landform Response: Buffers have been added to the plans. OPEN – It appears that buffer averaging is being used to compensate for keeping the trail along Bluff Creek Boulevard south of wetland 3 out of the buffer. Buffer averaging computation, average and minimum widths must be shown on the plans for all buffer areas. D5. There appears to be steep slopes adjacent to several wetland. If the required buffer encompasses all or part of a slope averaging 18 percent or greater over a distance of 50 feet or more upgradient of the regulated feature, the buffer must extend to the width specified under section 3.1a or to the top of the slope, whichever is greater. Landform Response: Buffers have been added to the plans. OPEN- Buffer must extend to the top of slopes averaging 18 percent or greater adjacent to wetland #6 and MnDOT Wetland. Signs need to be relocated to the upslope extent of the buffers D6. Before any work subject to District permit requirements commences, buffer areas and maintenance requirements must be documented in a maintenance declaration recorded with the County. A draft declaration template is available for download from the RPBCWD website (www.rpbcwd.org/permits). The draft must be submitted to the District for review and approval prior to recording. Landform Response: Acknowledged. OPEN – Will be included as recommended condition of approval Because the project will involve 113 acres of land-disturbing activity, the project must conform to RPBCWD’sstormwater management rule as described in Rule J, Subsection 2. As noted in our in-person meeting on March 12,2018, compliance with RPBCWD’s stormwater-management requirements will be assessed for the various stages orphases of the project in aggregate. (Rule J, section 2.5.) Any shortfall from compliance will need to be the subject of avariance request. To conform to the RPBCWD Rule J the following revisions are needed: Landform Response: The project involves 93 acres or land-disturbing activity on site and 3.6 acres of land-disturbing activity off-site, for a total of 96.6 acres of land-disturbing activity. J1. Please update the existing conditions drawing to include the ground shot elevations referenced in the response to comments supporting the starting water elevation in Wetland 1 and 2 in the existing conditionsHydroCAD model? Landform Response: We have added a spot elevation at the low point of Wetland 1 (elevation adjusted by 0.1-foot. We have added a spot elevation (at the edge of ice) for Wetland 2, adjusting the NWL and area of basin. CLOSED – Thank you for clarifying J2. Thank you for showing the location of the outlet weir for Wetland 1. While the topography data supports acontrol elevation of something between Elevations 906-907, it is unclear why 906.5 was selected. Becausethis control elevation is critical in determining the amount of discharge under existing conditions pleasesupply additional supporting information for the control elevation (preferable survey data but at a minimum LiDAR information). Landform Response: The spot elevations have been added to the existing topography map. We assumed the grade was the same between them and chose the weir location based on adjacent contours. CLOSED – Thank you for clarifying J3. Thank you for showing the location of the outlet weir for Wetland 2. While the existing topography data suggests an elevation higher than 909, the Carver County LiDAR indicates there is a close 910 contour around Wetland 2. This suggests that the outlet elevation should be higher than 910. Because this controlelevation is critical in determining the amount of discharge under existing conditions please supplyadditional supporting information for the control elevation (preferable survey data but at a minimum LiDARinformation). Landform Response: The spot elevations have been added to the plan. The weir data is based on site topography. LiDAR is too imprecise for creating an accurate ground model. CLOSED – Thank you for clarifying J4. The outlet from wetland 3 is modeled with a control elevation of 920.58 but no the existing topographicmaps do not contain a spot elevation to confirm that control elevation. While the map supports an elevationbetween 920-921 additional information is needed to define the critical control elevation. Because this control elevation is critical in determining the amount of discharge under existing conditions please supply additional supporting information for the control elevation (preferable survey data but at a minimum LiDARinformation). Landform Response: We have added numerous spot elevations in the area adjacent to the overflow. CLOSED – Thank you for clarifying J5. The stage-storage information used in the HydroCAD model does not match the data provided in Table 17 – Comparative floodplain storage. In addition, the areas entered into HydroCAD do not appear to reflect whatis computed from the existing conditions topographic map (e.g., in wetland 1 at elevation 907 HydoCADlists 15900 sf but measuring from the map I estimate 64125 sf, a significant difference). Differences werealso observed in wetland 2, wetland 3, Powers culvert, Basin 7. This raises questions about allstage/area/storage curves entered in the HydroCAD models. Please review and correct all storage curves as needed and submit supporting information for the inputs. Landform Response: The contour areas in the HydroCAD models have been harmonized with the plans, and now have the same information. Table 17 – Comparative Floodplain Storage indicates an overall compensatory storage in excess of the existing condition, however this storage is achieved at a different elevation profile than that of the existing. CLOSED – Thank you for clarifying J6. The culvert in the proposed condition model under Powers Boulevard is different from existing conditionsbut no information on the plans suggests this pipe will be replaced. The proposed condition mdel indicatesa CMP but existing conditions topo and HydroCAD indicate RCP. This pipe must be modeled as it existingin the field unless the development will modify the pipe. The HydroCAD models must be updated. Landform Response: The Ultimate model has been change to an RCP outlet. CLOSED – Thank you for clarifying J7. The existing conditions topographic map list an outlet IE = 907.0 from Basin 7 but IE = 906.6 was used inthe HydroCAD model. Please revise to reflect existing conditions topography information. Landform Response: The model has been revised to show and IE=907.0. The 906.6 elevation was based on record drawings. CLOSED – Thank you for clarifying J8. The proposed conditions HydroCAD model only reflect ultimate buildout but no design information, plans,outlet details are provided to support the model inputs. While conceptual in nature, the applicant mustsubmit information showing piping (how stormwater flows from one BMP to the next and ultimately discharges from the site) and cross section and outlet configuration detail for all BMPs to support the Ultimate buildout scenario being modeled in HydroCAD and P8. The 4/25/18 response to commentsindicates an exhibit in Appendix E. I was unable to locate the referenced exhibit. Please resubmit thereferenced exhibit that shows the “Ultimate Rock beds and Pervious Pavers”. Landform Response: The referenced Ultimate Rock beds and Pervious Pavers is included with this submittal in Appendix D. OPEN – The drainage map provided mostly addresses the comment by illustrating the location of the rockbeds and pervious paver areas. However, it is unclear in the exhibit if the rock bed under the previous paver area is being used for storage in HydroCAD. In addition, please confirm that the public infiltration areas will remain in-place as shown on the drainage map or if they are intended to be filled and replacedwith underground systems. As suggested by the HydroCAD modeling. J9. Thank you for submitting the cross section for the surface infiltration BMPs for Phase 1. Cross Sections for the underground rock galleries and pervious paver areas are needed to support the ultimate conditionscenario. Without information we are unable to validate the rate control and water quality modeling. Landform Response: Details for Typical Rock Beds and Typical Pervious Pavers & Rock Beds has been added to C7.5 CLOSED – Thank you for clarifying J10. Please submit detailed utility drawings for Phase 1 showing the outlet control structures and piping for alltemporary and permanent storm sewer systems and basins. (e.g, the plan and profile drawings and theutilities do not contain information for the outlets from the basins including NW Pond, East Pond, or any ofthe temporary basins). Without this information, the modeling cannot be verified and compliance with ratecontrol and water quality cannot be assessed. Landform Response: Plan and Profiles for the Phase 1 storm has been added to the C3 sheets OPEN – No profile information is shown on the C3 sheets. Are the appropriate profiles on the C5 sheets? In addition, there does not appear to be any details on the OCS configuration. J11. The outlet information in the phase 1 HydroCAD model indicates the control elevation for the NW basin is890.0 while the phase 1 grading indicates a NWL = 887. Please explain the difference and revise the submittal as needed. Landform Response: Northwest pond has been removed. CLOSED – Thank you for clarifying J12. The modeling of the NW basin in Phase 1 needs to be revised so the starting water level in the pondmatches the outlet elevation in the model. The HydroCAD model is starting the water level for the simulations at 881 but the outlet according to the model is 890. This provides an additional nine feet of storage in the model than what will be observed in the field. Therefore the model must be revised to correct this issue. Landform Response: Northwest pond has been removed. CLOSED – Thank you for clarifying J13. The modeling of the east basin in Phase 1 needs to be revised. The grading plan and outlet information in the HydroCAD model both indicate a NWL = 904. However, the model is starting the water level for the simulations at 902. This provides an additional two feet of storage in the model than what will be observedin the field. Therefore the model must be revised to remove that 2 feet of storage. Landform Response: The starting elevation for the east basin in phase 1 has been revised to 904. OPEN – Phase 1 HydroCAD model indicates an 84” vertical orifice at 904. However, the plans show a 96”manhole with a rim at 905.87 which does not reflect the condition in the phase 1 model. Please clarify andrevise. J14. The HydroCAD model indicated the outlet from Bluff Creek West basin (47P) is at 909.0 with thebottom of the basin at 908.43 resulting in 1.47 feet of storage. Please confirm that intent is to provide1.47 feet of storage below the outlet. Landform Response: The bottom elevation of 47P is 908.43 in Phase 1 with and an outlet elevation of 908.67 CLOSED – Thank you for clarifying J15. For the NW Basin the ultimate condition HydroCAD model only contains two stage/storage points. Please revise to reflect conceptual ultimate conditions grading shown on the drainage map. Landform Response: Northwest pond has been removed. CLOSED – Thank you for clarifying J16. Please provide spreadsheet used to compute abstraction numbers submitted in Appendix F (InfiltrationCalculation table). Landform Response: See the “Avienda Infiltration Areas Ultimate 2018-05-18” spreadsheet. CLOSED – Thank you for clarifying J17. The infiltration calculations output provided in Appendix F appear to only reflect ultimate conditions. Pleaseprovide abstraction computation for Phase 1 must be provided for each infiltration basin proposed for Phase1. Landform Response: See the Avienda Infiltration Areas Phase I 2018-05-188 Spreadsheet. OPEN – One line at bottom of table considers Phase 1 in aggregate. Please provide detailed square footage callouts for each open air infiltration basins proposed for Phase 1 construction. J18. While the 4/25/18 response to comments indicates 25S is connect to 24S with a pipe, no supportinginformation was submitted to verify the modeling inputs and that the pipe as adequate capacity to convey the needed flow. Therefore, the infiltration calculation submitted for the ultimate buildout scenario needs some additional clarification. For example, subwatershed 25S – West – North show a 50.*% deficiency. How is excess runoff from a 1.1” event conveyed to 24S Northwest such that the abstract is provided asyour table suggests? This question applies to all areas that show shortages. Landform Response: The Ultimate HydroCAD model calls for a 21-inch diameter pipe at a .8% slope to convey discharge from 25 S to 24 S. CLOSED – Thank you for clarifying J19. The infiltration/abstraction computations rely on over 128,000 SF of pervious pavers.Information showingthe location of the proposed pervious pavers in each subwatershed must be provided. Landform Response: As previously stated, the pervious pavers are shown conceptually on the Pavers and Rock Bed Areas – Ultimate exhibit. They are also shown on the Ultimate Drainage map. There are 422,029 s.f. of pervious pavers proposed for the Ultimate development as totaled on the Infiltration Calculations spreadsheet. There are no pervious pavers proposed for the Phase I development. CLOSED – Thank you for clarifying J20. A typical pervious paver cross section and rock bed detail must be provided. Landform Response: Details for Typical Rock Beds and Typical Pervious Pavers & Rock Beds has been added to C7.5 CLOSED – Thank you for clarifying J21. The plan set should be updated to include details on the proposed proprietary hydrodynamic separatorstructures to make sure the proper structure is install at the intended location. The computations indicatefour different models are proposed but the location of each model does not appears to be shown on the plan sheets. Landform Response: A typical detail for the Hydrodynamic separator has been included on sheet C7.5. Structures shall be installed at CDS 321, CDS 441, CDS 421, CDS 435, CDS 431, CDS 231, CDS 121 as shown on plan. CLOSED – Thank you for clarifying J22. Thank you for submitting the cross section for the surface infiltration BMPs. Cross Sections for the underground rock galleries and pervious paver areas are needed to support the ultimate condition scenario.Without information we are unable to validate the rate control and water quality modeling. Landform Response: Details for Typical Rock Beds and Typical Pervious Pavers & Rock Beds has been added to C7.5 CLOSED – Thank you for clarifying J23. The P8 models submitted for Phase 1 do not contain any connected impervious surface in the watersheds. The impervious surface within each subwatershed must be entered into the P8 models under the unsweptconnected impervious fractions (similar to the ultimate conditions P8 model). Landform Response: An updated Phase 1 P8 model is forthcoming. OPEN – Waiting for applicant to submitted updated Phase 1 P8 Models fro review J24. Information on the hydrodynamic Landform Response: A typical detail for the Hydrodynamic separator has been included on sheet C7.5. CLOSED – Thank you for clarifying J25. Permit applicant must provide a maintenance and inspection plan. The plan must be documented in a formacceptable to the District. A draft maintenance agreement is available on the permits page of the RPBCWD website. (http://www.rpbcwd.org/permits/) Landform Response: A maintenance and inspection plan will be provided once the design is approved and prior to permit issuance. OPEN – Will be included as recommended condition of approval J26. The outlet control structures used in the Phase 1 HydroCAD modeling do not appear to match in the information shown on the plans. Below is a summary of some of the differences observed with diameters. In many of these instances, the invert elevations on the plans do not appear to match HydroCAD. Pleaserevise drawing to include each OCS for the permanent and temporary BMPs. This could also be providedwith a typical outlet detail accompanied by a table of relevant dimensions and elevations on the drawings. HydroCAD NODE Plan Diameter (in)HydroCAD Diameter (in) 3P 15 18 2P 15 18 1P 30 24 11.4P 96” MH 84” vertical orifice 14P 18 12 15P 24 12 28P 21 12 25P 21 12 24P 24 12 33P Not Listed 12 46P Not Listed 15 47P Not Listed 24 48P Not Listed 24 51P 15 12 52P 15 12 J27. When running the provided HydroCAD model oscillation warnings appeared in the existing conditions modelwhile oscillation and reach depth exceeded warnings in the Phase 1 and ultimate conditions modeling. Please adjust modeling input to eliminate the warning messages. J28. The time of concentration for watershed 00S in the Susan Lake existing conditions model appears to rely ona flow lengths that is rough 150 feet too long. Please review and correct as needed. J29. The flow lengths for watershed 2S, 3S, 4S, 5S, 6S, & 8S I the existing conditions model need to beextended to the outlet from the watershed rather than the upstream edge of the wetland. J30. Existing conditions HydroCAD model uses HSG B while the Phase 1 and Ultimate condition modeling assume HSG D. J31. The Phase 1 Susan Lake drainage area HydroCAD models do not appear to include exfiltration from any ofthe permanent infiltration from the 2 basins (NE and SE basins). Will these basins be used for abstraction? If so, suggest adding exfiltration in these two basins similar to how the basins in the Bluff Creek modeling were handled. J32. Aggregate pervious paver and rock bed areas are provide by subwatershed for ultimate conditions. I amunable to verify the total areas using the PDFs provided. To verify these totals, please provide a square footage callout for each polygon for areas used for pervious pavement, rock bed, and open infiltration on a drawing. J33. The rock storage under the pervious pavement areas appears to be being used for abstraction credit for theadditional impervious surface within each watershed. For example I measured roughly 56,000 SF of rock bed based on the cross hatched area, which overlays the pervious pavement areas) and 27,000 SF of pervious pavement in watershed 11.1S. The impervious surface areas listed in the infiltration spreadsheetexclude pervious pavement but count the rock bed under the pavers for toward abstraction conformance. This is a double counting of the capacity of the rock under the pervious pavement to provide abstraction.Because the volume below the pavers will be filled by the runoff filtering through the pavement there is no available volume to store runoff from the other impervious surfaces. The applicant must either count the pervious pavement area as impervious surface in the abstraction calculations (similar to MIDS calculator – “The Impervious Cover includes the surface area of the permeable pavement and impervious area in thewatershed that drains directly to the permeable pavement BMP”) or exclude the rock bed area under thepervious pavement areas as providing abstraction. J34. How will secondary overflow from Bluff Creek West Basin (47P) be conveyed to 52P in the Phase 1 condition? The grading plans suggest it would overflow toward Triangle Basin 46P. Please review andmodify as needed or provide supporting information. J35. There appears to be a secondary outlet from 33P that results in flow bypassing the 34P low area in the Phase 1 and ultimate conditions which does not appear to reflect the topography. Please review and modify as needed or provide supporting information. J36. Why it pond 45P located within the Lake Susan drainage area but receiving runoff from the Bluff Creek drainage area on the Ultimate Drainage map? Please confirm drainage divides. J37. Why the storage in Pond 48P change between Phase 1 and Ultimate conditions? The lowering of thestorage Pond 48P is converted to a rock bed, correct?. J38. The following comments are associated with the ultimate conditions P8 Model a. The P8 model simulation period needs to be extended to include precipitation through 2015. The water quality modeling should reflect the most recent 10 year of data available. Revise P8 models and resubmit. b. Below is a table that summarizes the differences discovered between P8 and HydroCAD forthe watershed inputs. Please review and revise P8 or HydroCAD to match the plan sheets and drainage maps as appropriate so models are consistent. Note that the delta reflect HydroCAD –P8. Therefore a positive value means the Input in HydroCAD is higher than P8 Node ID Delta Area Delta Imp Fraction 11.1S 0 0.000 11.2S 0 0.004 11.3S 0 0.061 11.4S 0 0.455 11oS 0.819 0.000 12S 0 0.001 14S -0.225 0.008 15S 0.225 -0.010 24S 0 0.000 25S 0 0.000 28S 0 0.000 31S 0 0.000 33S 0 0.000 41S 0 -0.143 45S 0 0.000 46S 0 0.000 47S 0 0.000 48S 0 0.000 c. A constant CN of 80 was used for pervious portion of all the watersheds in P8. This is differentthan the weighted pervious CN used in HydroCAD. The pervious CN inputs in P8 must berevised to be consistent with those entered into HydroCAD. d. The surface area for the following devices do not match those in HydroCAD, thus impacting thestorage volumes in P8. Please revise model inputs or provide documentation supporting thisdifference. POND ID P8 Surface area (ac) HydroCAD Area (ac) HydroCAD/P8 Volume Different 11.1P 1.43 1.328 Yes 11.3P 1.69 1.51 Yes 12P 4.65 4.39 Yes 15P 0.21 0.16 Yes 31P 0.61 0.61 Yes (~24%) e. The live storage volume entered for device 11.4 should only reflect the volume between the NWL and the overflow. Because the volume entered in P8 reflect the cumulative total, the P8 model must be revised. f. It appears that Pond 34P is being used for water quality treatment by the applicant for runofffrom the Avienda development. Because the majority of the storage volume and the outlet structure are on property owned by an entity other than the applicant, property rights to use and maintain this offsite BMP must be obtained by the applicant and documentation provided to theDistrict. g. Please update device Pond 34 to match inputs in HydroCAD. h. P8 modeling of the Triangle pond indicates there is 0.041 acre-feet of storage that will beinfiltrated. However, HydroCAD indicates no storage below the outlet. Please revise one orboth of the models as is appropriate to reflect a consistent design. J39. The P8 models submitted for Phase 1 appear to be the same as those previously submitted.. Basedon the applicant’s response to comment J23, RPBCWD is waiting for applicant to submitted updatedPhase 1 P8 Models for review. Review of the additional materials will result in additional comments that will need to be addressed prior to issuing a permit. We will do everything we can to ensure that we move you through the permitting process as quickly as possible. Please contact me (952-832-2755) or Terry Jeffery (952-807-6885) with any questions or concerns. Thank you, Scott Sobiech, CFM, PE Vice President Senior Water Resources Engineer Minneapolis, MN office: 952.832.2755 ssobiech@barr.com www.barr.com If you no longer wish to receive marketing e-mails from Barr, respond to communications@barr.com and we will be happy tohonor your request. From: Scott Sobiech Sent: Friday, May 04, 2018 3:02 PM To: 'Chris Call, PE' <CCall@landform.net> Cc: Steven Sabraski <SSabraski@landform.net>; 'Claire Bleser (cbleser@rpbcwd.org)' <cbleser@rpbcwd.org>; tjeffery@rpbcwd.org; 'Strong, Vanessa' <VStrong@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; Oehme, Paul <poehme@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; Scott Sobiech <SSobiech@barr.com> Subject: RPBCWD Permit 2018-016: Avienda Review Comments2 Chris (and Steve) The RPBCWD received your revised submittal for permit application 2018-016, the proposed Avienda Development plan in Chanhassen, on April 25, 2018. Based on a review of the information, the application remains incomplete. A review of the submitted information has generated the following questions or comments. These are only preliminary comments and do not constitute an exhaustive review of the submitted materials. Additional comments will be generated with complete submittal. Many of the items listed below will need to be addressed before a recommendation can be made to the RPBCWD Board of Managers. The application will be considered incomplete until the following information is received: 1. Cross Sections for the underground rock galleries and pervious paver areas are needed to support the ultimate condition scenario. Without information we are unable to validate the rate control, abstraction, and water quality modeling. 2. Detailed utility drawings for Phase 1 showing the outlet control structures and piping for all temporary and permanent storm sewer systems and basins. (e.g, the plan and profile drawings and the utilities do not contain information for the outlets from the basins including NW Pond, East Pond, or any of the temporary basins) Without this information, the modeling cannot be verified and compliance with rate control, abstraction, and water quality cannot be assessed.3. The revised submittal indicates property ownership information was provided by the developer. I may have missed itbut to knowledge the RPBCWD has not received the supporting information requested in the following comment: a. The application indicates the property is owned by Mr. Bahram Akradi which does not align with the information on the Caver County Property website. The website indicates the property is owned by LEVEL 7 DEVELOPMENT LLC. Please provide written confirmation that Mr. Bahram Akradi is an authorized representative of LEVEL 7 DEVELOPMENT LLC. Because the project involves work below the 100-year flood elevation of a waterbody (wetlands 1, 2, 5, 8 & 9), theproject must conform to the requirements in the RPBCWD Floodplain Management and Drainage Alterations rule (Rule B, Subsection 2.1). To conform to the RPBCWD Rule B the following revisions are needed: B1. The locations of the flared end sections on the utility drawings (2018-04-24 Bluff Creek Utility PlansSCD14001.pdf) appear to suggest that the end sections will be place at or very near the delineated wetlandboundary of wetland 3, 4 and 6. Because this is somewhat different than the information shown on the grading plan it is difficult to know which design is being proposed. However any riprap placed at the FES outlets would be within the wetlands and the 100-year floodplain. Placement of fill below the 100-year floodelevation is prohibited unless fully compensatory storage at the same elevation (+/- 1 foot) and within thefloodplain of the same waterbody is provided (Rule B Subsection 3.2). Because the project will involve 113 acres of land-disturbing activity, the project must conform to the requirements in the RPBCWD Erosion and Sediment Control rule (Rule C, Subsection 2.1). To conform to the RPBCWD Rule C the following revisions are needed: C1. Redundant perimeter protection (e.g., double rows of silt fence) is needed between the land disturbing activities and MNDOT Wetland M09. C2. RPBCWD standard erosion control note 34 related to decompaction on sheets C3.1, 3.1A-3.1D must be revised to remove “(8 inches for single family home properties)” because this is not applicable to the proposed development. C3. The name and contact information of the general contractor responsible for the site must be provided (this information does not need to be provided prior to making a recommendation to the RPBCWD Board). Because the proposed work triggers RPBCWD’s Floodplain Management (Rule B) and Stormwater ManagementRules (Rule J) and Wetlands 3, 4, 6, and MNDOT Wetland M09 are downgradient of the activities, Rule D,Subsections 2.1a and 3.1 require buffer around these wetlands. To conform to the RPBCWD Rule D the followingrevisions are needed: D1. The WCA Notice of Decision clearly delineates the MNDOT Wetland M09.The wetland function and values assessment using MnRAM is needed for the downgradient wetland MNDOT Wetland M09 to determine the value of the buffer according to Appendix D1 of Rule D, the buffer location and the required average/minimum widths. Because this wetland is located offsite the applicant can submit the best available data to support a determination. Based on information available to the District it appears that the City of Chanhassen has assigned a Preserve” rating to this wetland. Based on this information and without a MnRAM for this wetland immediately adjacent to the parcel, the wetland should be assumed to be exceptional value and require an 80 foot average, 40 foot minimum buffer width. D2. While the response to comments suggest information was provided on sheets C2.1A-D, thus sheets were not included in the submittal for review. In addition, it is unclear based on the information on sheet C2.1 what is buffer area and there does not appear to be the required buffer signs for any of the regulated wetlands. The buffer area and signage location must be clearly shown on the plans. D3. The buffer must be indicated by permanent, free-standing markers at the buffer’s upland edge, in material conformity with a design and text provided by the District. A marker must be placed along each lot line, with additional markers at an interval of no more than 200 feet or where the buffer changes direction. The location of the markers must be provided on the plans. I was unable to identify this information on sheet C3.1 as suggested in the response to comments. D4. It appears the trail and Bluff Creek Boulevard south of wetland 3 may extend within the buffer area. It is difficult to confirm the statement that the roadway is not within the buffer because the buffer limits and signage locations are not clearly shown on the plans. While a trail for nonmotorized use is allowable with in the buffer, the impervious surface of the trail should not be included in the buffer averaging computations used to determine that the minimum required buffer is provided. Please clearly show the buffer boundaries and provide buffer-averaging computations to support the minimum and average buffer width provided for each wetland (Wetlands 3, 4, 6, and MNDOT Wetland M09). D5. There appears to be steep slopes adjacent to several wetland. If the required buffer encompasses all or part of a slope averaging 18 percent or greater over a distance of 50 feet or more upgradient of the regulated feature, the buffer must extend to the width specified under section 3.1a or to the top of the slope, whichever is greater. D6. Before any work subject to District permit requirements commences, buffer areas and maintenance requirements must be documented in a maintenance declaration recorded with the County. A draft declaration template is available for download from the RPBCWD website (www.rpbcwd.org/permits). The draft must be submitted to the District for review and approval prior to recording. Because the project will involve 113 acres of land-disturbing activity, the project must conform to RPBCWD’sstormwater management rule as described in Rule J, Subsection 2. As noted in our in-person meeting on March 12,2018, compliance with RPBCWD’s stormwater-management requirements will be assessed for the various stages or phases of the project in aggregate. (Rule J, section 2.5.) Any shortfall from compliance will need to be the subject of a variance request. To conform to the RPBCWD Rule J the following revisions are needed: J1. Please update the existing conditions drawing to include the ground shot elevations referenced in the response to comments supporting the starting water elevation in Wetland 1 and 2 in the existing conditions HydroCAD model? J2. Thank you for showing the location of the outlet weir for Wetland 1. While the topography data supports acontrol elevation of something between Elevations 906-907, it is unclear why 906.5 was selected. Because this control elevation is critical in determining the amount of discharge under existing conditions please supply additional supporting information for the control elevation (preferable survey data but at a minimumLiDAR information). J3. Thank you for showing the location of the outlet weir for Wetland 2. While the existing topography data suggests an elevation higher than 909, the Carver County LiDAR indicates there is a close 910 contour around Wetland 2. This suggests that the outlet elevation should be higher than 910. Because this controlelevation is critical in determining the amount of discharge under existing conditions please supplyadditional supporting information for the control elevation (preferable survey data but at a minimum LiDARinformation). J4. The outlet from wetland 3 is modeled with a control elevation of 920.58 but no the existing topographicmaps do not contain a spot elevation to confirm that control elevation. While the map supports an elevationbetween 920-921 additional information is needed to define the critical control elevation. Because thiscontrol elevation is critical in determining the amount of discharge under existing conditions please supply additional supporting information for the control elevation (preferable survey data but at a minimum LiDAR information). J5. The stage-storage information used in the HydroCAD model does not match the data provided in Table 17 –Comparative floodplain storage. In addition, the areas entered into HydroCAD do not appear to reflect what is computed from the existing conditions topographic map (e.g., in wetland 1 at elevation 907 HydoCAD lists 15900 sf but measuring from the map I estimate 64125 sf, a significant difference). Differences werealso observed in wetland 2, wetland 3, Powers culvert, Basin 7. This raises questions about allstage/area/storage curves entered in the HydroCAD models. Please review and correct all storage curvesas needed and submit supporting information for the inputs. J6. The culvert in the proposed condition model under Powers Boulevard is different from existing conditionsbut no information on the plans suggests this pipe will be replaced. The proposed condition mdel indicatesa CMP but existing conditions topo and HydroCAD indicate RCP. This pipe must be modeled as it existingin the field unless the development will modify the pipe. The HydroCAD models must be updated. J7. The existing conditions topographic map list an outlet IE = 907.0 from Basin 7 but IE = 906.6 was used inthe HydroCAD model. Please revise to reflect existing conditions topography information. J8. The proposed conditions HydroCAD model only reflect ultimate buildout but no design information, plans, outlet details are provided to support the model inputs. While conceptual in nature, the applicant must submit information showing piping (how stormwater flows from one BMP to the next and ultimately discharges from the site) and cross section and outlet configuration detail for all BMPs to support the Ultimate buildout scenario being modeled in HydroCAD and P8. The 4/25/18 response to comments indicates an exhibit in Appendix E. I was unable to locate the referenced exhibit. Please resubmit the referenced exhibit that shows the “Ultimate Rock beds and Pervious Pavers”. J9. Thank you for submitting the cross section for the surface infiltration BMPs for Phase 1. Cross Sections for the underground rock galleries and pervious paver areas are needed to support the ultimate condition scenario. Without information we are unable to validate the rate control and water quality modeling. J10. Please submit detailed utility drawings for Phase 1 showing the outlet control structures and piping for all temporary and permanent storm sewer systems and basins. (e.g, the plan and profile drawings and the utilities do not contain information for the outlets from the basins including NW Pond, East Pond, or any ofthe temporary basins). Without this information, the modeling cannot be verified and compliance with ratecontrol and water quality cannot be assessed. J11. The outlet information in the phase 1 HydroCAD model indicates the control elevation for the NW basin is 890.0 while the phase 1 grading indicates a NWL = 887. Please explain the difference and revise thesubmittal as needed. J12. The modeling of the NW basin in Phase 1 needs to be revised so the starting water level in the pondmatches the outlet elevation in the model. The HydroCAD model is starting the water level for the simulations at 881 but the outlet according to the model is 890. This provides an additional nine feet of storage in the model than what will be observed in the field. Therefore the model must be revised to correctthis issue. J13. The modeling of the east basin in Phase 1 needs to be revised. The grading plan and outlet information in the HydroCAD model both indicate a NWL = 904. However, the model is starting the water level for the simulations at 902. This provides an additional two feet of storage in the model than what will be observedin the field. Therefore the model must be revised to remove that 2 feet of storage. J14. The HydroCAD model indicated the outlet from Bluff Creek West basin (47P) is at 909.0 with the bottom of the basin at 908.43 resulting in 1.47 feet of storage. Please confirm that intent is to provide 1.47 feet of storage below the outlet. J15. For the NW Basin the ultimate condition HydroCAD model only contains two stage/storage points. Please revise to reflect conceptual ultimate conditions grading shown on the drainage map. J16. Please provide spreadsheet used to compute abstraction numbers submitted in Appendix F (InfiltrationCalculation table). J17. The infiltration calculations output provided in Appendix F appear to only reflect ultimate conditions. Pleaseprovide abstraction computation for Phase 1 must be provided for each infiltration basin proposed for Phase1. J18. While the 4/25/18 response to comments indicates 25S is connect to 24S with a pipe, no supporting information was submitted to verify the modeling inputs and that the pipe as adequate capacity to conveythe needed flow. Therefore, the infiltration calculation submitted for the ultimate buildout scenario needssome additional clarification. For example, subwatershed 25S – West – North show a 50.*% deficiency. How is excess runoff from a 1.1” event conveyed to 24S Northwest such that the abstract is provided as your table suggests? This question applies to all areas that show shortages. J19. The infiltration/abstraction computations rely on over 128,000 SF of pervious pavers. Information showingthe location of the proposed pervious pavers in each subwatershed must be provided. J20. A typical pervious paver cross section and rock bed detail must be provided. J21. The plan set should be updated to include details on the proposed proprietary hydrodynamic separatorstructures to make sure the proper structure is install at the intended location. The computations indicate four different models are proposed but the location of each model does not appears to be shown on the plan sheets. J22. Thank you for submitting the cross section for the surface infiltration BMPs. Cross Sections for the underground rock galleries and pervious paver areas are needed to support the ultimate condition scenario. Without information we are unable to validate the rate control and water quality modeling. J23. The P8 models submitted for Phase 1 do not contain any connected impervious surface in the watersheds. The impervious surface within each subwatershed must be entered into the P8 models under the unswept connected impervious fractions (similar to the ultimate conditions P8 model). J24. Information on the hydrodynamic J25. Permit applicant must provide a maintenance and inspection plan. The plan must be documented in a form acceptable to the District. A draft maintenance agreement is available on the permits page of the RPBCWD website. (http://www.rpbcwd.org/permits/) Review of the additional materials will result in additional comments that will need to be addressed prior to issuing a permit. For example, additional review comments on the HyrdoCAD and P8 models will be provided after the requested supporting information is provided and the modeling revisions requested above are addressed. We will do everything we can to ensure that we move you through the permitting process as quickly as possible. Please contact me (952-832-2755) or Terry Jeffery (952-807-6885) with any questions or concerns. Thank you, Scott Sobiech, CFM, PE Vice President Senior Water Resources Engineer Minneapolis, MN office: 952.832.2755 ssobiech@barr.com www.barr.com If you no longer wish to receive marketing e-mails from Barr, respond to communications@barr.com and we will be happy tohonor your request. From: Chris Call, PE [mailto:CCall@landform.net] Sent: Friday, April 27, 2018 9:04 AM To: 'Claire Bleser (cbleser@rpbcwd.org)' <cbleser@rpbcwd.org>; tjeffery@rpbcwd.org; Scott Sobiech <SSobiech@barr.com> Cc: Steven Sabraski <SSabraski@landform.net> Subject: RE: Avienda Watershed Submittal Just a reminder that the We Transfer link expires after 7 days. Please let Steve or me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Chris Call, PE LANDFORM, Senior Designer Direct: 612-638-0262 From: Chris Call, PE Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2018 3:36 PM To: 'Claire Bleser (cbleser@rpbcwd.org)' <cbleser@rpbcwd.org>; tjeffery@ci.chanhassen.mn.us; 'Scott Sobiech (ssobiech@barr.com)' <ssobiech@barr.com>; Paul Oehme (poehme@ci.chanhassen.mn.us) <poehme@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Cc: 'Steven Sabraski, PE (ssabraski@landform.net)' <ssabraski@landform.net> Subject: Avienda Watershed Submittal All – I have sent you files via We Transfer. You should be receiving an email from them with instructions on how to download the files. Please contact Steve Sabraski if you have any questions. Thanks, Chris Call, PE LANDFORM, Senior Designer Direct: 612-638-0262 NOTICE: All drawings, specifications, instruments of service, and other documents, data, or information of any kind, including all electronic files and data ("Documents") attached to or"linked" from this E-mail are protected by copyright pursuant to U.S. and international copyright laws. Your use of the Documents is controlled and restricted by the terms of use. Bydownloading the attached files or by accessing the links contained in this E-mail message, you are agreeing to the .terms of use. COPYRIGHT © 1994-2018 LANDFORM. ALL RIGHTSRESERVED. NOTICE: indicated professional registrations are for the state in which the office is located; to obtain information about other state licenses, please contact Human Resources at 612-252- 9070. Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. GRADING PERMIT PERMIT dated ______________, issued by the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota political subdivision ("City"), to _______________________________., a Launch Properties, LLC (the "Developer"). 1. Request for Grading Permit. The Developer has asked the City to approve a grading permit in conjunction with the proposed plat for Avienda (referred to in this permit as the "plat"). The land is legally described as follows: THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (S 1/2 OF SW 1/4), SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 23, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA, EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING 2 DESCRIBED TRACTS: LINE 1. COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 23; THENCE RUNNING NORTHON SECTION LINE 30 FEET; THENCE IN A STRAIGHT LINE TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION, 30FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE WEST 30 FEET TO SAID SOUTHWEST CORNER OFSAID SECTION AND PLACE OF BEGINNING, BEING A THREE CORNERED PIECE IN SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION23, TOWNSHIP 116 RANGE 23; AND 2. THAT PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND THEEAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, BOTH IN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 116 NORTH, RANGE 23 WEST, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA WHICH LIES EASTERLY OF LINE 2 DESCRIBED BELOW: LINE 2. BEGINNING AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE RUN WEST ON AN AZIMUTH OF 271DEGREES 56 MINUTES 13 SECONDS ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 23 FOR 1634.23 FEET TO A POINT; THENCEON AN AZIMUTH OF OO DEGREES 43 MINUTES 24 SECONDS FOR 500.11 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE ON AN AZIMUTH OF 91DEGREES 56 MINUTES 13 SECONDS FOR 1173.46 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE ON AN AZIMUTH OF 29 DEGREES 19 MINUTES18 SECONDS FOR 152.11 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE ON AN AZIMUTH OF 352 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 23 SECONDS FOR709.36 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE ONAN AZIMUTH OF 91 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 02 SECONDS ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER FOR 475.37 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND THERE TERMINATING. ABSTRACT. TOGETHER WITH PARCEL 1 THE NORTH 420.00 FEET OF THE EAST 414.86 FEET OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 23, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA. PARCEL 2 THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 23, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA EXCEPT FOR THE SOUTH 658.24 FEET THEREOF; AND ALSO EXCEPT THE NORTH 420.00 FEET OF THE EAST 414.86 FEET THEREOF. PARCEL 3 THE SOUTH 658.24 FEET OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 23, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA. TOGETHER WITH THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (NE 1/4 OF SW 1/4) OF SECTION TWENTY- THREE (23), TOWNSHIP ONE HUNDRED SIXTEEN (116) NORTH OF RANGE TWENTY-THREE (23) WEST, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA, EXCEPT THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER {NE 1/4 OF SW 1/4) OF SECTION TWENTY-THREE (23), TOWNSHIP ONE HUNDRED SIXTEEN (116) NORTH, RANGE TWENTY-THREE (23) WEST, SHOWN AS PARCEL 64 ON MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 10-19, FILED 10-19-2004 AS DOCUMENT NO. 39930 2. Conditions of Approval. The City hereby approves the permit on condition that the Developer abide by its terms and furnish the security required by this permit and meet all conditions of the City Council approved for final plat and grading plan. 3. Plans. The proposed plat shall be graded in accordance with the City approved plans. The plans shall not be attached to this permit. If the plans vary from the written terms of this permit, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Grading and Soil Erosion Control Plan for Avienda Plat 4. Time of Performance. The Developer shall complete the grading, drainage and erosion control in the plat by December 31, 2019. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 5. Erosion Control. Erosion Control Plan shall be implemented by the Developer and daily inspected by its Engineer. The City will inspected the proposed plat area as needed and may impose additional erosion control requirements if deemed necessary. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such work within thirty (30) days, the City may draw down the letter of credit to pay any costs. A NPDES General Permit to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity (MN R100001) must be obtained before any soil disturbing activity begins. In compliance with MN R100001 Part III.C., A temporary sediment basin must be provided for every 5 acres of disturbance. Prior to receiving a grading permit developer must submit a dewatering plan including proposed staging of dewatering equipment, and materials being used. All dewatering activity done during construction must have prior approval from City Water Resources Staff. A certified SWPPP Inspector must be identified, and contact information provided, before any soil disturbing activity begins. All disturbed, unworked slopes 3:1 or greater require erosion control blanket or equivalent stabilization within 7 days. 6. Grading Plan. The proposed plat shall be graded in accordance with the grading plan. Within thirty (30) days after completion of the grading and before the City releases the security, the Developer shall provide the City with an "as constructed" grading plan and a certification by a registered land surveyor or engineer that all ponds, swales, and ditches have been constructed per plan and functioning to meet approved storm water requirements. 7. Clean up. The Developer shall promptly clean dirt and debris from streets that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. 8. Security. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this permit, the Developer shall furnish the City with a cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, from a bank ("security") for $500,000. The bank and form of the letter of credit shall be subject to the approval of the City. The letter of credit shall be for a term ending December 31, 2020. 9. Responsibility for Costs. A. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer shall pay all costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the grading, drainage and erosion control, including but not limited to legal, planning, engineering and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the permit, the preparation of this permit, and all costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting the grading, drainage and erosion control. B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from permit approval and work done in conjunction with it. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorney's fees. C. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this permit, including engineering inspection and attorney's fees. D. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this permit within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all work and construction. 10. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given notice of the work in default, not less than 48 hours in advance. This permit is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 11. Insurance. Developer shall take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained until six (6) months after the City has accepted the public improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Developer's work or the work of its subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than $750,000 for one person and $2,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $1,000,000 for each occurrence. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy, and the Developer shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the plat. CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: ____________________________________ (SEAL) Mayor AND ____________________________________ City Manager DEVELOPER: BY: ____________________________________ Its STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF Carver ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _______ day of _________________, 20__, by ____________________________ and by _______________________, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. _____________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF __________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _______ day of _______________, __, by _____________________, the ______________________ of Launch Properties, LLC of Minnesota, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, on its behalf. _____________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 (612) 452-5000 AMP EXHIBIT "A" TO GRADING PERMIT Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. ___________________ Date: _________________ TO: City of Chanhassen 601 Main Street PO Box 99 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55054 Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of ___ Launch Properties, LLC and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $500,000, available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. __________, dated ________________, 20___, of ____(Name of Bank)____"; b) Be signed by the Mayor or City Clerk of the City of Chanhassen. c) Be presented for payment at ___(Address of Bank)___, on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 30, 20___. This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty- five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Chanhassen City Clerk that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Chanhassen City Clerk, Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd, P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317, and is actually received by the City Clerk at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 500. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. BY: ____________________________________ Its ______________________________ XXXXXXXXXXIIIIIIIIIIII>IEDGE OF PLOWED FIELD EDGE OF PLOWED FIELD EDGE OF PLOWED FIELD EDGE OF PLOWED FIELD EDGE OF PLOWED FIELD EDGE OF PLOWED FIELD XXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> B-3 B-2B-1 B-4 B-5 B-6 B-7 B-8 B-9 B-10 B-12B-11 B-13 B-14 B-15 B-16 B-17 B-18 B-19 B-20 B-21B-22 B-23B-24 B-25 B-26 B-27 B-28 B-29 B-30 B-31 B-32 WETLAND#6 WETLAND #3 WETLAND#4 WETLAND #10 HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER BOOK 150 OF DEEDS,PG.313 HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER BOOK 150 OF DEEDS,PG.307 45'PERMANENT D&U EASEMENT PER MNDOT R/W PLAT NO.10-19 (DOC.NO.A399301) N 4 2 °4 3 '4 2 "W 5 8 .0 8 N 0 0 °4 3 '2 5 "E 9 .7 6 S00°43'25"W 12.95 S47°01'24"W 49.70 MNDOT WETLAND M10 09.509.506.506.520.5820.4409.5>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>CENTER NORTH TEMP BASIN BOT. ELEV = 908.37 SOUTH CENTER TEMP BASINBOT.ELEV =890.0 > > > > > > > > > >> 25.0%5.4%4.1%>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>1:41:3 1 :5 1:4 1:31:31:5 1:31:3 1:4 1:3 1:41:31:3 1:31:4 1:31:41:31:31:3„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„C3.1D C3.1A „„„„„„„„„„„„„„„ WA C3.1B C3.1C WA BBBBBB B AABB B AABBBA A BBA A BBBA A BB B AABB B AAA ABBBBAAAABBB A AB BBBA AB BBBA ABBBBD DC C BB B AAA A B B B B„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„ „„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„ „„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„ „„„ „„„„„„„„ „„„ „„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„PROJECT NO. FILE NAME BY DATE DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW LANDFORMcCONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS. TITLESHEET PROJECT SHEET INDEX ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY PROJECT MANAGER REVIEW CERTIFICATION Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. DEVELOPER MUNICIPALITY SES 05.23.2018 05.23.2018 SCD14001 20184600 KINGS POINT RD MINNETRISTA, MN 55331 CIVIL & LANDSCAPE TITLE SHEET EXISTING CONDITIONS TREE PRESERVATION TREE INVENTORY OVERALL SITE PLAN TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS PHASE 1 MASS GRADING, DRAINAGE, & EROSION NW PHASE 1 MASS GRADING, DRAINAGE, & EROSION NE PHASE 1 MASS GRADING, DRAINAGE, & EROSION SW PHASE 1 MASS GRADING, DRAINAGE, & EROSION SE PHASE 1 MASS GRADING, DRAINAGE, & EROSION BASIN CROSS SECTIONS SEEDING PLAN SWPPP NOTES PHASE 1 OVERALL UTILITIES WEST AVIENDA PARKWAY STREET & STORM WEST AVIENDA PARKWAY STREET & STORM NORTH AVIENDA PARKWAY STREET & STORM SUNSET TRAIL STREET & STORM NORTH AVIENDA PARKWAY STREET & STORM EAST AVIENDA PARKWAY STREET & STORM EAST AVIENDA STORM EAST OUTLET STORM EAST TEMP BASIN NETWORK STORM EAST TEMP BASIN NETWORK STORM WEST AVIENDA PARKWAY WATER & SANITARY WEST AVIENDA PARKWAY WATER & SANITARY NORTH AVIENDA PARKWAY WATER & SANITARY NORTH AVIENDA PARKWAY WATER & SANITARY EAST AVIENDA PARKWAY WATER & SANITARY EAST AVIENDA PARKWAY WATER & SANITARY NORTH WEST OUTLET PARKWAY WATER & SANITARY SUNSET TRAIL WATER & SANITARY CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS NORTH PHASE 1 PLANTING PLAN SE PHASE 1 PLANTING PLAN SW PHASE 1 PLANTING PLAN LANDSCAPE NOTES & DETAILS C0.1 C1.1 C1.3 C1.4 C2.1 C2.2 C3.1 C3.1A C3.1B C3.1C C3.1D C3.2 C3.3 C3.4 C4.1 C5.1 C5.2 C5.3 C5.4 C5.5 C5.6 C5.7 C5.8 C5.9 C5.10 C6.1 C6.2 C6.3 C6.4 C6.5 C6.6 C6.7 C6.8 C7.1 C7.2 C7.3 C7.4 C7.5 L2.1A L2.1B L2.1C L7.1 CITY SUBMITTAL CITY SUBMITTAL CLIENT REVIEW USACE SUBMITTAL PROGRESS SET CITY SUBMITTAL WATERSHED SUBMITTAL WATERSHED SUBMITTAL WATERSHED SUBMITTAL SES SES SES SES SES SES SES SES SES 14 APR 2017 14JUNE2017 30 JUNE 2017 23 OCT 2017 26 FEB 2018 16 MAR 2018 21 MAR 2018 25 APR 2018 23 MAY 2018 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is available upon request. Steven E. Sabraski License No:Date: C301SCD001.DWG PHASE 1 MASS GRADING, DRAINAGE, & EROSION CONTROLC3.1 NORTH 0 150 300 CONTACT UTILITY SERVICE PROVIDERS FOR FIELD LOCATION OF SERVICES 72 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING GRADING. REFER TO THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT PREPARED BY BRAUN INTERTEC, DATED APRIL 12, 2017, FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON BACKFILL MATERIAL AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS. REMOVE TOPSOIL FROM GRADING AREAS AND STOCKPILE SUFFICIENT QUANTITY FOR REUSE. MAINTAIN STOCKPILES WITH MAXIMUM 1V:2H SLOPES. REMOVE SURFACE AND GROUND WATER FROM EXCAVATIONS. PROVIDE INITIAL LIFTS OF STABLE FOUNDATION MATERIAL IF EXPOSED SOILS ARE WET AND UNSTABLE. AN INDEPENDENT TESTING FIRM SHALL VERIFY THE REMOVAL OF ORGANIC AND UNSUITABLE SOILS, SOIL CORRECTION, AND COMPACTION AND PROVIDE PERIODIC REPORTS TO THE OWNER. PLACE AND COMPACT FILL USING LIFT THICKNESSES MATCHED TO SOIL TYPE AND COMPACTION EQUIPMENT TO OBTAIN SPECIFIED COMPACTION THROUGHOUT THE LIFT. COMPACT COHESIVE SOILS IN PAVED AREAS TO 95% OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY, STANDARD PROCTOR (ASTM D698) EXCEPT THE TOP 3 FEET WHICH SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 100%. COMPACT TO 98% DENSITY WHERE FILL DEPTH EXCEEDS 10 FEET. THE SOILS SHALL BE WITHIN 3% OF OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT. IN GRANULAR SOILS ALL PORTIONS OF THE EMBANKMENT SHALL BE COMPACTED TO NOT LESS THAN 95% OF MODIFIED PROCTOR DENSITY (ASTM D1557). AVOID SOIL COMPACTION OF INFILTRATION PRACTICES. ANY EQUIPMENT USED IN INFILTRATION AREAS SHOULD BE SMALL SCALED AND TRACKED. ALL DISTURBED SOIL SURFACE AREAS, EXCEPT FOR THE AREAS UNDER THE PROPOSED STREET PAVEMENT AND THE TRAIL AND SIDEWALKS, SHALL BE DECOMPACTED TO A DEPTH OF 18-INCHES AND COVERED WITH SIX INCHES OF TOPOSOIL. REFER TO RPBCWD STANDARD EROSION CONTROL NOTES FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. INSTALL PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK AND MAINTAIN FOR DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. INSTALL POND / BASIN PROTECTION SEDIMENT CONTROLS WITHIN 7 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF BASIN GRADING. REMOVE PERIMETER CONTROLS AFTER AREAS CONTRIBUTING RUNOFF ARE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED AND DISPOSE OF OFF SITE. LIMIT SOIL DISTURBANCE TO THE GRADING LIMITS SHOWN. SCHEDULE OPERATIONS TO MINIMIZE LENGTH OF EXPOSURE OF DISTURBED AREAS. MANAGEMENT PRACTICES SHOWN ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT. INSTALL AND MAINTAIN ADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS WORK PROCEEDS TO PREVENT EROSION AND CONTROL SEDIMENT CARRIED BY WIND OR WATER. REFER TO SWPPP NOTES ON SHEET C3.4 FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. EXCAVATE PONDS AND TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS EARLY IN THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE. REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM PONDS AND BASINS PERIODICALLY AND AFTER AREAS CONTRIBUTING RUNOFF ARE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. CONTRACTOR SHALL PREVENT SEDIMENT LADEN WATER FROM ENTERING INFILTRATION SYSTEMS UNTIL THE SITE IS COMPLETELY STABILIZED. ALL EXPOSED SOILS AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. TEMPORARY SEED, SOD, MULCH AND FERTILIZER SHALL MEET THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS, AS MODIFIED. ITEM SPECIFICATION NUMBER SOD MNDOT 3878 SEED MNDOT 3876 MN TYPE 22-111 @ 30.5 LB/AC - TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MN TYPE 25-151 @ 120 LB/AC - PERMANENT TURF MN TYPE 33-261 @ 35 LB/AC - PERMANENT WETLAND BUFFER MULCH MNDOT 3882 (MNDOT TYPE 1 @ 2 TON/AC, DISC ANCHORED) FERTILIZER (FOR PERMANENT TURF ONLY)MNDOT 3881 GENERAL PLACEMENT MNDOT 2575 SEE SITE RESTORATION SHEET FOR PERMANENT TURF AND LANDSCAPE ESTABLISHMENT. SCRAPE ADJACENT STREETS CLEAN DAILY AND SWEEP CLEAN WEEKLY. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. GRADING NOTES GENERAL NOTES LEGEND :INLET PROTECTION „„:SILT FENCE :VEHICLE TRACKING PAD ESTIMATED QUANTITY 134 EACH 2 EACH 18,000 FEET SYMBOL DESCRIPTION EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES FOR CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEYING SERVICES CONTACT LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AT 612.252.9070. 1. WA :CONCRETE WASHOUT :EROSION CONTROL BLANKET RPBCWD STANDARD EROSION CONTROL NOTES (CONT.) :DRAINAGE SWALE NATURAL TOPOGRAPHY AND SOIL CONDITIONS MUST BE PROTECTED, INCLUDING RETENTION ONSITE OF NATIVE TOPSOIL TO THE GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE. ADDITIONAL MEASURES, SUCH AS HYDRAULIC MULCHING AND OTHER PRACTICES AS SPECIFIED BY THE DISTRICT MUST BE USED ON SLOPES OF 3:1 (H:V) OR STEEPER TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE STABILIZATION. FINAL SITE STABILIZATION MEASURES MUST SPECIFY THAT AT LEAST SIX INCHES OF TOPSOIL OR ORGANIC MATTER BE SPREAD AND INCORPORATED INTO THE UNDERLYING SOIL DURING FINAL SITE TREATMENT WHEREVER TOPSOIL HAS BEEN REMOVED. CONSTRUCTION SITE WASTE SUCH AS DISCARDED BUILDING MATERIALS, CONCRETE TRUCK WASHOUT, CHEMICALS, LITTER AND SANITARY WASTE MUST BE PROPERLY MANAGED. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS MUST BE MAINTAINED UNTIL COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION AND VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED SUFFICIENTLY TO ENSURE STABILITY OF THE SITE, AS DETERMINED BY THE DISTRICT. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS MUST BE REMOVED UPON FINAL STABILIZATION. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. ALL DISTURBED AREAS MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER LAND-DISTURBING WORK HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED ON A PROPERTY THAT DRAINS TO AN IMPAIRED WATER, WITHIN 14 DAYS ELSEWHERE. SOIL SURFACES COMPACTED DURING CONSTRUCTION AND REMAINING PERVIOUS UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION MUST BE DECOMPACTED THROUGH SOIL AMENDMENT AND/OR RIPPING TO A DEPTH OF 18 INCHES WHILE TAKING CARE TO AVOID UTILITIES, TREE ROOTS AND OTHER EXISTING VEGETATION PRIOR TO FINAL REVEGETATION OR OTHER STABILIZATION. THE PERMITTEE MUST, AT A MINIMUM, INSPECT, MAINTAIN AND REPAIR ALL DISTURBED SURFACES AND ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES AND SOIL STABILIZATION MEASURES EVERY DAY WORK IS PERFORMED ON THE SITE AND AT LEAST WEEKLY UNTIL LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITY HAS CEASED. THEREAFTER, THE PERMITTEE MUST PERFORM THESE RESPONSIBILITIES AT LEAST WEEKLY UNTIL VEGETATIVE COVER IS ESTABLISHED. THE PERMITTEE MUST ALSO PERFORM THESE RESPONSIBILITIES ALSO WITHIN 24-HOURS OF THE END OF ANY 0.5-INCH OR GREATER RAINFALL EVENT UNTIL VEGETATIVE COVER IS ESTABLISHED.THE PERMITTEE WILL MAINTAIN A LOG OF ACTIVITIES UNDER THIS SECTION FOR INSPECTION BY THE DISTRICT ON REQUEST. ACTIVITIES MUST BE CONDUCTED SO AS TO MINIMIZE THE POTENTIAL TRANSFER OF AQUATIC INVASIVE SPECIES (E.G., ZEBRA MUSSELS, EURASIAN WATERMILFOIL, ETC.) TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT POSSIBLE. 27. 28. 29. 30. RPBCWD STANDARD EROSION CONTROL NOTES (CONT.) >IEDGE OF PLOWED FIELD>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>B-2B-1 B-4 B-5 B-6B-13 B-14 B-31 WETLAND#6 HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER BOOK 150 OF DEEDS,PG.313 N 4 2 °4 3 '4 2 "W 5 8 .0 8 N 0 0 °4 3 '2 5 "E 9 .7 6 S00°43'25"W 12.95 S47°01'24"W 49.70 09.5>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> CENTER NORTH TEMP BASIN BOT. ELEV = 908.37 25.0%5.4%>>>>>>>>> >>>>>1:41:3 1 :5 1 :4 1:3„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„VEHICLETRACKINGPAD PLUG INVERT UNTIL PUBLIC INFILTRATION BASIN IS CONSTRUCTED „„„„„„ WA BB B AABB B AABBBA A BA A A „„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„ „„„„„„„„„„„ „„„„„„PROJECT NO. FILE NAME BY DATE DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW LANDFORMcCONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS. TITLESHEET PROJECT SHEET INDEX ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY PROJECT MANAGER REVIEW CERTIFICATION Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. DEVELOPER MUNICIPALITY SES 05.23.2018 05.23.2018 SCD14001 20184600 KINGS POINT RD MINNETRISTA, MN 55331 CIVIL & LANDSCAPE TITLE SHEET EXISTING CONDITIONS TREE PRESERVATION TREE INVENTORY OVERALL SITE PLAN TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS PHASE 1 MASS GRADING, DRAINAGE, & EROSION NW PHASE 1 MASS GRADING, DRAINAGE, & EROSION NE PHASE 1 MASS GRADING, DRAINAGE, & EROSION SW PHASE 1 MASS GRADING, DRAINAGE, & EROSION SE PHASE 1 MASS GRADING, DRAINAGE, & EROSION BASIN CROSS SECTIONS SEEDING PLAN SWPPP NOTES PHASE 1 OVERALL UTILITIES WEST AVIENDA PARKWAY STREET & STORM WEST AVIENDA PARKWAY STREET & STORM NORTH AVIENDA PARKWAY STREET & STORM SUNSET TRAIL STREET & STORM NORTH AVIENDA PARKWAY STREET & STORM EAST AVIENDA PARKWAY STREET & STORM EAST AVIENDA STORM EAST OUTLET STORM EAST TEMP BASIN NETWORK STORM EAST TEMP BASIN NETWORK STORM WEST AVIENDA PARKWAY WATER & SANITARY WEST AVIENDA PARKWAY WATER & SANITARY NORTH AVIENDA PARKWAY WATER & SANITARY NORTH AVIENDA PARKWAY WATER & SANITARY EAST AVIENDA PARKWAY WATER & SANITARY EAST AVIENDA PARKWAY WATER & SANITARY NORTH WEST OUTLET PARKWAY WATER & SANITARY SUNSET TRAIL WATER & SANITARY CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS NORTH PHASE 1 PLANTING PLAN SE PHASE 1 PLANTING PLAN SW PHASE 1 PLANTING PLAN LANDSCAPE NOTES & DETAILS C0.1 C1.1 C1.3 C1.4 C2.1 C2.2 C3.1 C3.1A C3.1B C3.1C C3.1D C3.2 C3.3 C3.4 C4.1 C5.1 C5.2 C5.3 C5.4 C5.5 C5.6 C5.7 C5.8 C5.9 C5.10 C6.1 C6.2 C6.3 C6.4 C6.5 C6.6 C6.7 C6.8 C7.1 C7.2 C7.3 C7.4 C7.5 L2.1A L2.1B L2.1C L7.1 CITY SUBMITTAL CITY SUBMITTAL CLIENT REVIEW USACE SUBMITTAL PROGRESS SET CITY SUBMITTAL WATERSHED SUBMITTAL WATERSHED SUBMITTAL WATERSHED SUBMITTAL SES SES SES SES SES SES SES SES SES 14 APR 2017 14JUNE2017 30 JUNE 2017 23 OCT 2017 26 FEB 2018 16 MAR 2018 21 MAR 2018 25 APR 2018 23 MAY 2018 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is available upon request. Steven E. Sabraski License No:Date: NORTH 0 60 120 CONTACT UTILITY SERVICE PROVIDERS FOR FIELD LOCATION OF SERVICES 72 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING GRADING. REFER TO THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT PREPARED BY BRAUN INTERTEC, DATED APRIL 12, 2017, FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON BACKFILL MATERIAL AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS. REMOVE TOPSOIL FROM GRADING AREAS AND STOCKPILE SUFFICIENT QUANTITY FOR REUSE. MAINTAIN STOCKPILES WITH MAXIMUM 1V:2H SLOPES. REMOVE SURFACE AND GROUND WATER FROM EXCAVATIONS. PROVIDE INITIAL LIFTS OF STABLE FOUNDATION MATERIAL IF EXPOSED SOILS ARE WET AND UNSTABLE. AN INDEPENDENT TESTING FIRM SHALL VERIFY THE REMOVAL OF ORGANIC AND UNSUITABLE SOILS, SOIL CORRECTION, AND COMPACTION AND PROVIDE PERIODIC REPORTS TO THE OWNER. PLACE AND COMPACT FILL USING LIFT THICKNESSES MATCHED TO SOIL TYPE AND COMPACTION EQUIPMENT TO OBTAIN SPECIFIED COMPACTION THROUGHOUT THE LIFT. COMPACT COHESIVE SOILS IN PAVED AREAS TO 95% OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY, STANDARD PROCTOR (ASTM D698) EXCEPT THE TOP 3 FEET WHICH SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 100%. COMPACT TO 98% DENSITY WHERE FILL DEPTH EXCEEDS 10 FEET. THE SOILS SHALL BE WITHIN 3% OF OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT. IN GRANULAR SOILS ALL PORTIONS OF THE EMBANKMENT SHALL BE COMPACTED TO NOT LESS THAN 95% OF MODIFIED PROCTOR DENSITY (ASTM D1557). AVOID SOIL COMPACTION OF INFILTRATION PRACTICES. ANY EQUIPMENT USED IN INFILTRATION AREAS SHOULD BE SMALL SCALED AND TRACKED. ALL DISTURBED SOIL SURFACE AREAS, EXCEPT FOR THE AREAS UNDER THE PROPOSED STREET PAVEMENT AND THE TRAIL AND SIDEWALKS, SHALL BE DECOMPACTED TO A DEPTH OF 18-INCHES AND COVERED WITH SIX INCHES OF TOPOSOIL. REFER TO RPBCWD STANDARD EROSION CONTROL NOTES FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. INSTALL PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK AND MAINTAIN FOR DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. INSTALL POND / BASIN PROTECTION SEDIMENT CONTROLS WITHIN 7 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF BASIN GRADING. REMOVE PERIMETER CONTROLS AFTER AREAS CONTRIBUTING RUNOFF ARE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED AND DISPOSE OF OFF SITE. LIMIT SOIL DISTURBANCE TO THE GRADING LIMITS SHOWN. SCHEDULE OPERATIONS TO MINIMIZE LENGTH OF EXPOSURE OF DISTURBED AREAS. MANAGEMENT PRACTICES SHOWN ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT. INSTALL AND MAINTAIN ADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS WORK PROCEEDS TO PREVENT EROSION AND CONTROL SEDIMENT CARRIED BY WIND OR WATER. REFER TO SWPPP NOTES ON SHEET C3.4 FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. EXCAVATE PONDS AND TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS EARLY IN THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE. REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM PONDS AND BASINS PERIODICALLY AND AFTER AREAS CONTRIBUTING RUNOFF ARE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. CONTRACTOR SHALL PREVENT SEDIMENT LADEN WATER FROM ENTERING INFILTRATION SYSTEMS UNTIL THE SITE IS COMPLETELY STABILIZED. ALL EXPOSED SOILS AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. TEMPORARY SEED, SOD, MULCH AND FERTILIZER SHALL MEET THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS, AS MODIFIED. ITEM SPECIFICATION NUMBER SOD MNDOT 3878 SEED MNDOT 3876 MN TYPE 22-111 @ 30.5 LB/AC - TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MN TYPE 25-151 @ 120 LB/AC - PERMANENT TURF MN TYPE 33-261 @ 35 LB/AC - PERMANENT WETLAND BUFFER MULCH MNDOT 3882 (MNDOT TYPE 1 @ 2 TON/AC, DISC ANCHORED) FERTILIZER (FOR PERMANENT TURF ONLY)MNDOT 3881 GENERAL PLACEMENT MNDOT 2575 SEE SITE RESTORATION SHEET FOR PERMANENT TURF AND LANDSCAPE ESTABLISHMENT. SCRAPE ADJACENT STREETS CLEAN DAILY AND SWEEP CLEAN WEEKLY. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. GRADING NOTES GENERAL NOTES LEGEND :INLET PROTECTION „„:SILT FENCE :VEHICLE TRACKING PAD ESTIMATED QUANTITY 134 EACH 2 EACH 18,000 FEET SYMBOL DESCRIPTION EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES FOR CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEYING SERVICES CONTACT LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AT 612.252.9070. 1. WA :CONCRETE WASHOUT :EROSION CONTROL BLANKET RPBCWD STANDARD EROSION CONTROL NOTES (CONT.) :DRAINAGE SWALE NATURAL TOPOGRAPHY AND SOIL CONDITIONS MUST BE PROTECTED, INCLUDING RETENTION ONSITE OF NATIVE TOPSOIL TO THE GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE. ADDITIONAL MEASURES, SUCH AS HYDRAULIC MULCHING AND OTHER PRACTICES AS SPECIFIED BY THE DISTRICT MUST BE USED ON SLOPES OF 3:1 (H:V) OR STEEPER TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE STABILIZATION. FINAL SITE STABILIZATION MEASURES MUST SPECIFY THAT AT LEAST SIX INCHES OF TOPSOIL OR ORGANIC MATTER BE SPREAD AND INCORPORATED INTO THE UNDERLYING SOIL DURING FINAL SITE TREATMENT WHEREVER TOPSOIL HAS BEEN REMOVED. CONSTRUCTION SITE WASTE SUCH AS DISCARDED BUILDING MATERIALS, CONCRETE TRUCK WASHOUT, CHEMICALS, LITTER AND SANITARY WASTE MUST BE PROPERLY MANAGED. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS MUST BE MAINTAINED UNTIL COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION AND VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED SUFFICIENTLY TO ENSURE STABILITY OF THE SITE, AS DETERMINED BY THE DISTRICT. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS MUST BE REMOVED UPON FINAL STABILIZATION. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. ALL DISTURBED AREAS MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER LAND-DISTURBING WORK HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED ON A PROPERTY THAT DRAINS TO AN IMPAIRED WATER, WITHIN 14 DAYS ELSEWHERE. SOIL SURFACES COMPACTED DURING CONSTRUCTION AND REMAINING PERVIOUS UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION MUST BE DECOMPACTED THROUGH SOIL AMENDMENT AND/OR RIPPING TO A DEPTH OF 18 INCHES WHILE TAKING CARE TO AVOID UTILITIES, TREE ROOTS AND OTHER EXISTING VEGETATION PRIOR TO FINAL REVEGETATION OR OTHER STABILIZATION. THE PERMITTEE MUST, AT A MINIMUM, INSPECT, MAINTAIN AND REPAIR ALL DISTURBED SURFACES AND ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES AND SOIL STABILIZATION MEASURES EVERY DAY WORK IS PERFORMED ON THE SITE AND AT LEAST WEEKLY UNTIL LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITY HAS CEASED. THEREAFTER, THE PERMITTEE MUST PERFORM THESE RESPONSIBILITIES AT LEAST WEEKLY UNTIL VEGETATIVE COVER IS ESTABLISHED. THE PERMITTEE MUST ALSO PERFORM THESE RESPONSIBILITIES ALSO WITHIN 24-HOURS OF THE END OF ANY 0.5-INCH OR GREATER RAINFALL EVENT UNTIL VEGETATIVE COVER IS ESTABLISHED.THE PERMITTEE WILL MAINTAIN A LOG OF ACTIVITIES UNDER THIS SECTION FOR INSPECTION BY THE DISTRICT ON REQUEST. ACTIVITIES MUST BE CONDUCTED SO AS TO MINIMIZE THE POTENTIAL TRANSFER OF AQUATIC INVASIVE SPECIES (E.G., ZEBRA MUSSELS, EURASIAN WATERMILFOIL, ETC.) TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT POSSIBLE. 27. 28. 29. 30. RPBCWD STANDARD EROSION CONTROL NOTES (CONT.) C301ASCD001.DWG NW PHASE 1 MASS GRADING, DRAINAGE, & EROSION CONTROLC3.1A IIIIIIIIEDGE OF PLOWED FIELD EDGE OF PLOWED FIELD >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> B-3 B-6 B-7 B-15 B-16 B-17 B-32 '24"W 70 09.509.506.509.5>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>MP BASIN 8.37 4.1%1:31:31:5 1:31:3 1:4 PLUG INVERT UNTIL PUBLIC INFILTRATION BASIN IS CONSTRUCTED„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„ PLUG INVERT UNTIL PUBLIC INFILTRATION BASIN IS CONSTRUCTEDBBBA BB B AABB BA ABB BA „„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„PROJECT NO. FILE NAME BY DATE DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW LANDFORMcCONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS. TITLESHEET PROJECT SHEET INDEX ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY PROJECT MANAGER REVIEW CERTIFICATION Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. DEVELOPER MUNICIPALITY SES 05.23.2018 05.23.2018 SCD14001 20184600 KINGS POINT RD MINNETRISTA, MN 55331 CIVIL & LANDSCAPE TITLE SHEET EXISTING CONDITIONS TREE PRESERVATION TREE INVENTORY OVERALL SITE PLAN TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS PHASE 1 MASS GRADING, DRAINAGE, & EROSION NW PHASE 1 MASS GRADING, DRAINAGE, & EROSION NE PHASE 1 MASS GRADING, DRAINAGE, & EROSION SW PHASE 1 MASS GRADING, DRAINAGE, & EROSION SE PHASE 1 MASS GRADING, DRAINAGE, & EROSION BASIN CROSS SECTIONS SEEDING PLAN SWPPP NOTES PHASE 1 OVERALL UTILITIES WEST AVIENDA PARKWAY STREET & STORM WEST AVIENDA PARKWAY STREET & STORM NORTH AVIENDA PARKWAY STREET & STORM SUNSET TRAIL STREET & STORM NORTH AVIENDA PARKWAY STREET & STORM EAST AVIENDA PARKWAY STREET & STORM EAST AVIENDA STORM EAST OUTLET STORM EAST TEMP BASIN NETWORK STORM EAST TEMP BASIN NETWORK STORM WEST AVIENDA PARKWAY WATER & SANITARY WEST AVIENDA PARKWAY WATER & SANITARY NORTH AVIENDA PARKWAY WATER & SANITARY NORTH AVIENDA PARKWAY WATER & SANITARY EAST AVIENDA PARKWAY WATER & SANITARY EAST AVIENDA PARKWAY WATER & SANITARY NORTH WEST OUTLET PARKWAY WATER & SANITARY SUNSET TRAIL WATER & SANITARY CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS NORTH PHASE 1 PLANTING PLAN SE PHASE 1 PLANTING PLAN SW PHASE 1 PLANTING PLAN LANDSCAPE NOTES & DETAILS C0.1 C1.1 C1.3 C1.4 C2.1 C2.2 C3.1 C3.1A C3.1B C3.1C C3.1D C3.2 C3.3 C3.4 C4.1 C5.1 C5.2 C5.3 C5.4 C5.5 C5.6 C5.7 C5.8 C5.9 C5.10 C6.1 C6.2 C6.3 C6.4 C6.5 C6.6 C6.7 C6.8 C7.1 C7.2 C7.3 C7.4 C7.5 L2.1A L2.1B L2.1C L7.1 CITY SUBMITTAL CITY SUBMITTAL CLIENT REVIEW USACE SUBMITTAL PROGRESS SET CITY SUBMITTAL WATERSHED SUBMITTAL WATERSHED SUBMITTAL WATERSHED SUBMITTAL SES SES SES SES SES SES SES SES SES 14 APR 2017 14JUNE2017 30 JUNE 2017 23 OCT 2017 26 FEB 2018 16 MAR 2018 21 MAR 2018 25 APR 2018 23 MAY 2018 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is available upon request. Steven E. Sabraski License No:Date: NORTH 0 60 120 CONTACT UTILITY SERVICE PROVIDERS FOR FIELD LOCATION OF SERVICES 72 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING GRADING. REFER TO THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT PREPARED BY BRAUN INTERTEC, DATED APRIL 12, 2017, FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON BACKFILL MATERIAL AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS. REMOVE TOPSOIL FROM GRADING AREAS AND STOCKPILE SUFFICIENT QUANTITY FOR REUSE. MAINTAIN STOCKPILES WITH MAXIMUM 1V:2H SLOPES. REMOVE SURFACE AND GROUND WATER FROM EXCAVATIONS. PROVIDE INITIAL LIFTS OF STABLE FOUNDATION MATERIAL IF EXPOSED SOILS ARE WET AND UNSTABLE. AN INDEPENDENT TESTING FIRM SHALL VERIFY THE REMOVAL OF ORGANIC AND UNSUITABLE SOILS, SOIL CORRECTION, AND COMPACTION AND PROVIDE PERIODIC REPORTS TO THE OWNER. PLACE AND COMPACT FILL USING LIFT THICKNESSES MATCHED TO SOIL TYPE AND COMPACTION EQUIPMENT TO OBTAIN SPECIFIED COMPACTION THROUGHOUT THE LIFT. COMPACT COHESIVE SOILS IN PAVED AREAS TO 95% OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY, STANDARD PROCTOR (ASTM D698) EXCEPT THE TOP 3 FEET WHICH SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 100%. COMPACT TO 98% DENSITY WHERE FILL DEPTH EXCEEDS 10 FEET. THE SOILS SHALL BE WITHIN 3% OF OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT. IN GRANULAR SOILS ALL PORTIONS OF THE EMBANKMENT SHALL BE COMPACTED TO NOT LESS THAN 95% OF MODIFIED PROCTOR DENSITY (ASTM D1557). AVOID SOIL COMPACTION OF INFILTRATION PRACTICES. ANY EQUIPMENT USED IN INFILTRATION AREAS SHOULD BE SMALL SCALED AND TRACKED. ALL DISTURBED SOIL SURFACE AREAS, EXCEPT FOR THE AREAS UNDER THE PROPOSED STREET PAVEMENT AND THE TRAIL AND SIDEWALKS, SHALL BE DECOMPACTED TO A DEPTH OF 18-INCHES AND COVERED WITH SIX INCHES OF TOPOSOIL. REFER TO RPBCWD STANDARD EROSION CONTROL NOTES FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. INSTALL PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK AND MAINTAIN FOR DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. INSTALL POND / BASIN PROTECTION SEDIMENT CONTROLS WITHIN 7 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF BASIN GRADING. REMOVE PERIMETER CONTROLS AFTER AREAS CONTRIBUTING RUNOFF ARE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED AND DISPOSE OF OFF SITE. LIMIT SOIL DISTURBANCE TO THE GRADING LIMITS SHOWN. SCHEDULE OPERATIONS TO MINIMIZE LENGTH OF EXPOSURE OF DISTURBED AREAS. MANAGEMENT PRACTICES SHOWN ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT. INSTALL AND MAINTAIN ADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS WORK PROCEEDS TO PREVENT EROSION AND CONTROL SEDIMENT CARRIED BY WIND OR WATER. REFER TO SWPPP NOTES ON SHEET C3.4 FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. EXCAVATE PONDS AND TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS EARLY IN THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE. REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM PONDS AND BASINS PERIODICALLY AND AFTER AREAS CONTRIBUTING RUNOFF ARE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. CONTRACTOR SHALL PREVENT SEDIMENT LADEN WATER FROM ENTERING INFILTRATION SYSTEMS UNTIL THE SITE IS COMPLETELY STABILIZED. ALL EXPOSED SOILS AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. TEMPORARY SEED, SOD, MULCH AND FERTILIZER SHALL MEET THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS, AS MODIFIED. ITEM SPECIFICATION NUMBER SOD MNDOT 3878 SEED MNDOT 3876 MN TYPE 22-111 @ 30.5 LB/AC - TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MN TYPE 25-151 @ 120 LB/AC - PERMANENT TURF MN TYPE 33-261 @ 35 LB/AC - PERMANENT WETLAND BUFFER MULCH MNDOT 3882 (MNDOT TYPE 1 @ 2 TON/AC, DISC ANCHORED) FERTILIZER (FOR PERMANENT TURF ONLY)MNDOT 3881 GENERAL PLACEMENT MNDOT 2575 SEE SITE RESTORATION SHEET FOR PERMANENT TURF AND LANDSCAPE ESTABLISHMENT. SCRAPE ADJACENT STREETS CLEAN DAILY AND SWEEP CLEAN WEEKLY. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. GRADING NOTES GENERAL NOTES LEGEND :INLET PROTECTION „„:SILT FENCE :VEHICLE TRACKING PAD ESTIMATED QUANTITY 134 EACH 2 EACH 18,000 FEET SYMBOL DESCRIPTION EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES FOR CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEYING SERVICES CONTACT LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AT 612.252.9070. 1. WA :CONCRETE WASHOUT :EROSION CONTROL BLANKET RPBCWD STANDARD EROSION CONTROL NOTES (CONT.) :DRAINAGE SWALE NATURAL TOPOGRAPHY AND SOIL CONDITIONS MUST BE PROTECTED, INCLUDING RETENTION ONSITE OF NATIVE TOPSOIL TO THE GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE. ADDITIONAL MEASURES, SUCH AS HYDRAULIC MULCHING AND OTHER PRACTICES AS SPECIFIED BY THE DISTRICT MUST BE USED ON SLOPES OF 3:1 (H:V) OR STEEPER TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE STABILIZATION. FINAL SITE STABILIZATION MEASURES MUST SPECIFY THAT AT LEAST SIX INCHES OF TOPSOIL OR ORGANIC MATTER BE SPREAD AND INCORPORATED INTO THE UNDERLYING SOIL DURING FINAL SITE TREATMENT WHEREVER TOPSOIL HAS BEEN REMOVED. CONSTRUCTION SITE WASTE SUCH AS DISCARDED BUILDING MATERIALS, CONCRETE TRUCK WASHOUT, CHEMICALS, LITTER AND SANITARY WASTE MUST BE PROPERLY MANAGED. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS MUST BE MAINTAINED UNTIL COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION AND VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED SUFFICIENTLY TO ENSURE STABILITY OF THE SITE, AS DETERMINED BY THE DISTRICT. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS MUST BE REMOVED UPON FINAL STABILIZATION. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. ALL DISTURBED AREAS MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER LAND-DISTURBING WORK HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED ON A PROPERTY THAT DRAINS TO AN IMPAIRED WATER, WITHIN 14 DAYS ELSEWHERE. SOIL SURFACES COMPACTED DURING CONSTRUCTION AND REMAINING PERVIOUS UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION MUST BE DECOMPACTED THROUGH SOIL AMENDMENT AND/OR RIPPING TO A DEPTH OF 18 INCHES WHILE TAKING CARE TO AVOID UTILITIES, TREE ROOTS AND OTHER EXISTING VEGETATION PRIOR TO FINAL REVEGETATION OR OTHER STABILIZATION. THE PERMITTEE MUST, AT A MINIMUM, INSPECT, MAINTAIN AND REPAIR ALL DISTURBED SURFACES AND ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES AND SOIL STABILIZATION MEASURES EVERY DAY WORK IS PERFORMED ON THE SITE AND AT LEAST WEEKLY UNTIL LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITY HAS CEASED. THEREAFTER, THE PERMITTEE MUST PERFORM THESE RESPONSIBILITIES AT LEAST WEEKLY UNTIL VEGETATIVE COVER IS ESTABLISHED. THE PERMITTEE MUST ALSO PERFORM THESE RESPONSIBILITIES ALSO WITHIN 24-HOURS OF THE END OF ANY 0.5-INCH OR GREATER RAINFALL EVENT UNTIL VEGETATIVE COVER IS ESTABLISHED.THE PERMITTEE WILL MAINTAIN A LOG OF ACTIVITIES UNDER THIS SECTION FOR INSPECTION BY THE DISTRICT ON REQUEST. ACTIVITIES MUST BE CONDUCTED SO AS TO MINIMIZE THE POTENTIAL TRANSFER OF AQUATIC INVASIVE SPECIES (E.G., ZEBRA MUSSELS, EURASIAN WATERMILFOIL, ETC.) TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT POSSIBLE. 27. 28. 29. 30. RPBCWD STANDARD EROSION CONTROL NOTES (CONT.) C301ASCD001.DWG NE PHASE 1 MASS GRADING, DRAINAGE, & EROSION CONTROLC3.1B XXXXXXXXXXIIIIIEDGE OF PLOWED FIELD X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X>>B-7 B-10 B-12 B-18 B-19 B-20 B-21B-22 B-23 B-28 B-29 06.506.5>>>>>>BASIN >>>>>>>>>>>>>>1:3 1:3 1:41:41:31:31:3VECHICLETRACKINGPAD PLUG INVERT UNTIL PUBLIC INFILTRATION BASIN IS CONSTRUCTED PLUG INVERT UNTIL PUBLIC INFILTRATION BASIN IS CONSTRUCTED WA BBBBAA ABBBBAAABBB AB BBBA A„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„PROJECT NO. FILE NAME BY DATE DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW LANDFORMcCONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS. TITLESHEET PROJECT SHEET INDEX ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY PROJECT MANAGER REVIEW CERTIFICATION Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. DEVELOPER MUNICIPALITY SES 05.23.2018 05.23.2018 SCD14001 20184600 KINGS POINT RD MINNETRISTA, MN 55331 CIVIL & LANDSCAPE TITLE SHEET EXISTING CONDITIONS TREE PRESERVATION TREE INVENTORY OVERALL SITE PLAN TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS PHASE 1 MASS GRADING, DRAINAGE, & EROSION NW PHASE 1 MASS GRADING, DRAINAGE, & EROSION NE PHASE 1 MASS GRADING, DRAINAGE, & EROSION SW PHASE 1 MASS GRADING, DRAINAGE, & EROSION SE PHASE 1 MASS GRADING, DRAINAGE, & EROSION BASIN CROSS SECTIONS SEEDING PLAN SWPPP NOTES PHASE 1 OVERALL UTILITIES WEST AVIENDA PARKWAY STREET & STORM WEST AVIENDA PARKWAY STREET & STORM NORTH AVIENDA PARKWAY STREET & STORM SUNSET TRAIL STREET & STORM NORTH AVIENDA PARKWAY STREET & STORM EAST AVIENDA PARKWAY STREET & STORM EAST AVIENDA STORM EAST OUTLET STORM EAST TEMP BASIN NETWORK STORM EAST TEMP BASIN NETWORK STORM WEST AVIENDA PARKWAY WATER & SANITARY WEST AVIENDA PARKWAY WATER & SANITARY NORTH AVIENDA PARKWAY WATER & SANITARY NORTH AVIENDA PARKWAY WATER & SANITARY EAST AVIENDA PARKWAY WATER & SANITARY EAST AVIENDA PARKWAY WATER & SANITARY NORTH WEST OUTLET PARKWAY WATER & SANITARY SUNSET TRAIL WATER & SANITARY CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS NORTH PHASE 1 PLANTING PLAN SE PHASE 1 PLANTING PLAN SW PHASE 1 PLANTING PLAN LANDSCAPE NOTES & DETAILS C0.1 C1.1 C1.3 C1.4 C2.1 C2.2 C3.1 C3.1A C3.1B C3.1C C3.1D C3.2 C3.3 C3.4 C4.1 C5.1 C5.2 C5.3 C5.4 C5.5 C5.6 C5.7 C5.8 C5.9 C5.10 C6.1 C6.2 C6.3 C6.4 C6.5 C6.6 C6.7 C6.8 C7.1 C7.2 C7.3 C7.4 C7.5 L2.1A L2.1B L2.1C L7.1 CITY SUBMITTAL CITY SUBMITTAL CLIENT REVIEW USACE SUBMITTAL PROGRESS SET CITY SUBMITTAL WATERSHED SUBMITTAL WATERSHED SUBMITTAL WATERSHED SUBMITTAL SES SES SES SES SES SES SES SES SES 14 APR 2017 14JUNE2017 30 JUNE 2017 23 OCT 2017 26 FEB 2018 16 MAR 2018 21 MAR 2018 25 APR 2018 23 MAY 2018 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is available upon request. Steven E. Sabraski License No:Date: NORTH 0 60 120 CONTACT UTILITY SERVICE PROVIDERS FOR FIELD LOCATION OF SERVICES 72 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING GRADING. REFER TO THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT PREPARED BY BRAUN INTERTEC, DATED APRIL 12, 2017, FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON BACKFILL MATERIAL AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS. REMOVE TOPSOIL FROM GRADING AREAS AND STOCKPILE SUFFICIENT QUANTITY FOR REUSE. MAINTAIN STOCKPILES WITH MAXIMUM 1V:2H SLOPES. REMOVE SURFACE AND GROUND WATER FROM EXCAVATIONS. PROVIDE INITIAL LIFTS OF STABLE FOUNDATION MATERIAL IF EXPOSED SOILS ARE WET AND UNSTABLE. AN INDEPENDENT TESTING FIRM SHALL VERIFY THE REMOVAL OF ORGANIC AND UNSUITABLE SOILS, SOIL CORRECTION, AND COMPACTION AND PROVIDE PERIODIC REPORTS TO THE OWNER. PLACE AND COMPACT FILL USING LIFT THICKNESSES MATCHED TO SOIL TYPE AND COMPACTION EQUIPMENT TO OBTAIN SPECIFIED COMPACTION THROUGHOUT THE LIFT. COMPACT COHESIVE SOILS IN PAVED AREAS TO 95% OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY, STANDARD PROCTOR (ASTM D698) EXCEPT THE TOP 3 FEET WHICH SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 100%. COMPACT TO 98% DENSITY WHERE FILL DEPTH EXCEEDS 10 FEET. THE SOILS SHALL BE WITHIN 3% OF OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT. IN GRANULAR SOILS ALL PORTIONS OF THE EMBANKMENT SHALL BE COMPACTED TO NOT LESS THAN 95% OF MODIFIED PROCTOR DENSITY (ASTM D1557). AVOID SOIL COMPACTION OF INFILTRATION PRACTICES. ANY EQUIPMENT USED IN INFILTRATION AREAS SHOULD BE SMALL SCALED AND TRACKED. ALL DISTURBED SOIL SURFACE AREAS, EXCEPT FOR THE AREAS UNDER THE PROPOSED STREET PAVEMENT AND THE TRAIL AND SIDEWALKS, SHALL BE DECOMPACTED TO A DEPTH OF 18-INCHES AND COVERED WITH SIX INCHES OF TOPOSOIL. REFER TO RPBCWD STANDARD EROSION CONTROL NOTES FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. INSTALL PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK AND MAINTAIN FOR DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. INSTALL POND / BASIN PROTECTION SEDIMENT CONTROLS WITHIN 7 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF BASIN GRADING. REMOVE PERIMETER CONTROLS AFTER AREAS CONTRIBUTING RUNOFF ARE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED AND DISPOSE OF OFF SITE. LIMIT SOIL DISTURBANCE TO THE GRADING LIMITS SHOWN. SCHEDULE OPERATIONS TO MINIMIZE LENGTH OF EXPOSURE OF DISTURBED AREAS. MANAGEMENT PRACTICES SHOWN ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT. INSTALL AND MAINTAIN ADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS WORK PROCEEDS TO PREVENT EROSION AND CONTROL SEDIMENT CARRIED BY WIND OR WATER. REFER TO SWPPP NOTES ON SHEET C3.4 FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. EXCAVATE PONDS AND TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS EARLY IN THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE. REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM PONDS AND BASINS PERIODICALLY AND AFTER AREAS CONTRIBUTING RUNOFF ARE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. CONTRACTOR SHALL PREVENT SEDIMENT LADEN WATER FROM ENTERING INFILTRATION SYSTEMS UNTIL THE SITE IS COMPLETELY STABILIZED. ALL EXPOSED SOILS AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. TEMPORARY SEED, SOD, MULCH AND FERTILIZER SHALL MEET THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS, AS MODIFIED. ITEM SPECIFICATION NUMBER SOD MNDOT 3878 SEED MNDOT 3876 MN TYPE 22-111 @ 30.5 LB/AC - TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MN TYPE 25-151 @ 120 LB/AC - PERMANENT TURF MN TYPE 33-261 @ 35 LB/AC - PERMANENT WETLAND BUFFER MULCH MNDOT 3882 (MNDOT TYPE 1 @ 2 TON/AC, DISC ANCHORED) FERTILIZER (FOR PERMANENT TURF ONLY)MNDOT 3881 GENERAL PLACEMENT MNDOT 2575 SEE SITE RESTORATION SHEET FOR PERMANENT TURF AND LANDSCAPE ESTABLISHMENT. SCRAPE ADJACENT STREETS CLEAN DAILY AND SWEEP CLEAN WEEKLY. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. GRADING NOTES GENERAL NOTES LEGEND :INLET PROTECTION „„:SILT FENCE :VEHICLE TRACKING PAD ESTIMATED QUANTITY 134 EACH 2 EACH 18,000 FEET SYMBOL DESCRIPTION EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES FOR CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEYING SERVICES CONTACT LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AT 612.252.9070. 1. WA :CONCRETE WASHOUT :EROSION CONTROL BLANKET RPBCWD STANDARD EROSION CONTROL NOTES (CONT.) :DRAINAGE SWALE NATURAL TOPOGRAPHY AND SOIL CONDITIONS MUST BE PROTECTED, INCLUDING RETENTION ONSITE OF NATIVE TOPSOIL TO THE GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE. ADDITIONAL MEASURES, SUCH AS HYDRAULIC MULCHING AND OTHER PRACTICES AS SPECIFIED BY THE DISTRICT MUST BE USED ON SLOPES OF 3:1 (H:V) OR STEEPER TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE STABILIZATION. FINAL SITE STABILIZATION MEASURES MUST SPECIFY THAT AT LEAST SIX INCHES OF TOPSOIL OR ORGANIC MATTER BE SPREAD AND INCORPORATED INTO THE UNDERLYING SOIL DURING FINAL SITE TREATMENT WHEREVER TOPSOIL HAS BEEN REMOVED. CONSTRUCTION SITE WASTE SUCH AS DISCARDED BUILDING MATERIALS, CONCRETE TRUCK WASHOUT, CHEMICALS, LITTER AND SANITARY WASTE MUST BE PROPERLY MANAGED. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS MUST BE MAINTAINED UNTIL COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION AND VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED SUFFICIENTLY TO ENSURE STABILITY OF THE SITE, AS DETERMINED BY THE DISTRICT. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS MUST BE REMOVED UPON FINAL STABILIZATION. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. ALL DISTURBED AREAS MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER LAND-DISTURBING WORK HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED ON A PROPERTY THAT DRAINS TO AN IMPAIRED WATER, WITHIN 14 DAYS ELSEWHERE. SOIL SURFACES COMPACTED DURING CONSTRUCTION AND REMAINING PERVIOUS UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION MUST BE DECOMPACTED THROUGH SOIL AMENDMENT AND/OR RIPPING TO A DEPTH OF 18 INCHES WHILE TAKING CARE TO AVOID UTILITIES, TREE ROOTS AND OTHER EXISTING VEGETATION PRIOR TO FINAL REVEGETATION OR OTHER STABILIZATION. THE PERMITTEE MUST, AT A MINIMUM, INSPECT, MAINTAIN AND REPAIR ALL DISTURBED SURFACES AND ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES AND SOIL STABILIZATION MEASURES EVERY DAY WORK IS PERFORMED ON THE SITE AND AT LEAST WEEKLY UNTIL LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITY HAS CEASED. THEREAFTER, THE PERMITTEE MUST PERFORM THESE RESPONSIBILITIES AT LEAST WEEKLY UNTIL VEGETATIVE COVER IS ESTABLISHED. THE PERMITTEE MUST ALSO PERFORM THESE RESPONSIBILITIES ALSO WITHIN 24-HOURS OF THE END OF ANY 0.5-INCH OR GREATER RAINFALL EVENT UNTIL VEGETATIVE COVER IS ESTABLISHED.THE PERMITTEE WILL MAINTAIN A LOG OF ACTIVITIES UNDER THIS SECTION FOR INSPECTION BY THE DISTRICT ON REQUEST. ACTIVITIES MUST BE CONDUCTED SO AS TO MINIMIZE THE POTENTIAL TRANSFER OF AQUATIC INVASIVE SPECIES (E.G., ZEBRA MUSSELS, EURASIAN WATERMILFOIL, ETC.) TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT POSSIBLE. 27. 28. 29. 30. RPBCWD STANDARD EROSION CONTROL NOTES (CONT.) C301ASCD001.DWG SE PHASE 1 MASS GRADING, DRAINAGE, & EROSION CONTROLC3.1C EDGE OF PLOWED FIELD EDGE OF PLOWED FIELD XX X X X X B-8 B-9 B-11 B-17 B B-24 B-25 B-26 B-27 B-30 WETLAND #3 WETLAND#420.5820.44>>>>>> >>SOUTH CENTER TEMP BASINBOT.ELEV =890.0 > > > > > > > > > >>>> >1:31:3 1:31:4 1:31:41:3PLUG INVERT UNTIL PUBLIC INFILTRATION BASIN IS CONSTRUCTED TEMPORARY WEIR STRUCTURE BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT SECONDARY BOUNDARY BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT PRIMARY BOUNDARYBAA A AB BBBA BBBBA ABBBBD DC C A A B B B B„„„„„„„ „„„„„ „„„„„„„„„„„„„„„ „„„„„ „„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„PROJECT NO. FILE NAME BY DATE DATE ISSUE / REVISION REVIEW LANDFORMcCONTACT ENGINEER FOR ANY PRIOR HISTORY IF THE SIGNATURE, SEAL OR FOUR LINES DIRECTLY ABOVE ARE NOT VISIBLE, THIS SHEET HAS BEEN REPRODUCED BEYOND INTENDED READABILITY AND IS NO LONGER A VALID DOCUMENT. PLEASE CONTACT THE ENGINEER TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS. TITLESHEET PROJECT SHEET INDEX ISSUE / REVISION HISTORY PROJECT MANAGER REVIEW CERTIFICATION Landform®and Site to Finish®are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. DEVELOPER MUNICIPALITY SES 05.23.2018 05.23.2018 SCD14001 20184600 KINGS POINT RD MINNETRISTA, MN 55331 CIVIL & LANDSCAPE TITLE SHEET EXISTING CONDITIONS TREE PRESERVATION TREE INVENTORY OVERALL SITE PLAN TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS PHASE 1 MASS GRADING, DRAINAGE, & EROSION NW PHASE 1 MASS GRADING, DRAINAGE, & EROSION NE PHASE 1 MASS GRADING, DRAINAGE, & EROSION SW PHASE 1 MASS GRADING, DRAINAGE, & EROSION SE PHASE 1 MASS GRADING, DRAINAGE, & EROSION BASIN CROSS SECTIONS SEEDING PLAN SWPPP NOTES PHASE 1 OVERALL UTILITIES WEST AVIENDA PARKWAY STREET & STORM WEST AVIENDA PARKWAY STREET & STORM NORTH AVIENDA PARKWAY STREET & STORM SUNSET TRAIL STREET & STORM NORTH AVIENDA PARKWAY STREET & STORM EAST AVIENDA PARKWAY STREET & STORM EAST AVIENDA STORM EAST OUTLET STORM EAST TEMP BASIN NETWORK STORM EAST TEMP BASIN NETWORK STORM WEST AVIENDA PARKWAY WATER & SANITARY WEST AVIENDA PARKWAY WATER & SANITARY NORTH AVIENDA PARKWAY WATER & SANITARY NORTH AVIENDA PARKWAY WATER & SANITARY EAST AVIENDA PARKWAY WATER & SANITARY EAST AVIENDA PARKWAY WATER & SANITARY NORTH WEST OUTLET PARKWAY WATER & SANITARY SUNSET TRAIL WATER & SANITARY CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS NORTH PHASE 1 PLANTING PLAN SE PHASE 1 PLANTING PLAN SW PHASE 1 PLANTING PLAN LANDSCAPE NOTES & DETAILS C0.1 C1.1 C1.3 C1.4 C2.1 C2.2 C3.1 C3.1A C3.1B C3.1C C3.1D C3.2 C3.3 C3.4 C4.1 C5.1 C5.2 C5.3 C5.4 C5.5 C5.6 C5.7 C5.8 C5.9 C5.10 C6.1 C6.2 C6.3 C6.4 C6.5 C6.6 C6.7 C6.8 C7.1 C7.2 C7.3 C7.4 C7.5 L2.1A L2.1B L2.1C L7.1 CITY SUBMITTAL CITY SUBMITTAL CLIENT REVIEW USACE SUBMITTAL PROGRESS SET CITY SUBMITTAL WATERSHED SUBMITTAL WATERSHED SUBMITTAL WATERSHED SUBMITTAL SES SES SES SES SES SES SES SES SES 14 APR 2017 14JUNE2017 30 JUNE 2017 23 OCT 2017 26 FEB 2018 16 MAR 2018 21 MAR 2018 25 APR 2018 23 MAY 2018 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. Signature shown is a digital reproduction of original. Wet signed copy of this plan on file at Landform Professional Services, LLC office and is available upon request. Steven E. Sabraski License No:Date: NORTH 0 60 120 CONTACT UTILITY SERVICE PROVIDERS FOR FIELD LOCATION OF SERVICES 72 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING GRADING. REFER TO THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT PREPARED BY BRAUN INTERTEC, DATED APRIL 12, 2017, FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON BACKFILL MATERIAL AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS. REMOVE TOPSOIL FROM GRADING AREAS AND STOCKPILE SUFFICIENT QUANTITY FOR REUSE. MAINTAIN STOCKPILES WITH MAXIMUM 1V:2H SLOPES. REMOVE SURFACE AND GROUND WATER FROM EXCAVATIONS. PROVIDE INITIAL LIFTS OF STABLE FOUNDATION MATERIAL IF EXPOSED SOILS ARE WET AND UNSTABLE. AN INDEPENDENT TESTING FIRM SHALL VERIFY THE REMOVAL OF ORGANIC AND UNSUITABLE SOILS, SOIL CORRECTION, AND COMPACTION AND PROVIDE PERIODIC REPORTS TO THE OWNER. PLACE AND COMPACT FILL USING LIFT THICKNESSES MATCHED TO SOIL TYPE AND COMPACTION EQUIPMENT TO OBTAIN SPECIFIED COMPACTION THROUGHOUT THE LIFT. COMPACT COHESIVE SOILS IN PAVED AREAS TO 95% OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY, STANDARD PROCTOR (ASTM D698) EXCEPT THE TOP 3 FEET WHICH SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 100%. COMPACT TO 98% DENSITY WHERE FILL DEPTH EXCEEDS 10 FEET. THE SOILS SHALL BE WITHIN 3% OF OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT. IN GRANULAR SOILS ALL PORTIONS OF THE EMBANKMENT SHALL BE COMPACTED TO NOT LESS THAN 95% OF MODIFIED PROCTOR DENSITY (ASTM D1557). AVOID SOIL COMPACTION OF INFILTRATION PRACTICES. ANY EQUIPMENT USED IN INFILTRATION AREAS SHOULD BE SMALL SCALED AND TRACKED. ALL DISTURBED SOIL SURFACE AREAS, EXCEPT FOR THE AREAS UNDER THE PROPOSED STREET PAVEMENT AND THE TRAIL AND SIDEWALKS, SHALL BE DECOMPACTED TO A DEPTH OF 18-INCHES AND COVERED WITH SIX INCHES OF TOPOSOIL. REFER TO RPBCWD STANDARD EROSION CONTROL NOTES FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. INSTALL PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK AND MAINTAIN FOR DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. INSTALL POND / BASIN PROTECTION SEDIMENT CONTROLS WITHIN 7 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF BASIN GRADING. REMOVE PERIMETER CONTROLS AFTER AREAS CONTRIBUTING RUNOFF ARE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED AND DISPOSE OF OFF SITE. LIMIT SOIL DISTURBANCE TO THE GRADING LIMITS SHOWN. SCHEDULE OPERATIONS TO MINIMIZE LENGTH OF EXPOSURE OF DISTURBED AREAS. MANAGEMENT PRACTICES SHOWN ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT. INSTALL AND MAINTAIN ADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS WORK PROCEEDS TO PREVENT EROSION AND CONTROL SEDIMENT CARRIED BY WIND OR WATER. REFER TO SWPPP NOTES ON SHEET C3.4 FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. EXCAVATE PONDS AND TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS EARLY IN THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE. REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM PONDS AND BASINS PERIODICALLY AND AFTER AREAS CONTRIBUTING RUNOFF ARE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. CONTRACTOR SHALL PREVENT SEDIMENT LADEN WATER FROM ENTERING INFILTRATION SYSTEMS UNTIL THE SITE IS COMPLETELY STABILIZED. ALL EXPOSED SOILS AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. TEMPORARY SEED, SOD, MULCH AND FERTILIZER SHALL MEET THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS, AS MODIFIED. ITEM SPECIFICATION NUMBER SOD MNDOT 3878 SEED MNDOT 3876 MN TYPE 22-111 @ 30.5 LB/AC - TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MN TYPE 25-151 @ 120 LB/AC - PERMANENT TURF MN TYPE 33-261 @ 35 LB/AC - PERMANENT WETLAND BUFFER MULCH MNDOT 3882 (MNDOT TYPE 1 @ 2 TON/AC, DISC ANCHORED) FERTILIZER (FOR PERMANENT TURF ONLY)MNDOT 3881 GENERAL PLACEMENT MNDOT 2575 SEE SITE RESTORATION SHEET FOR PERMANENT TURF AND LANDSCAPE ESTABLISHMENT. SCRAPE ADJACENT STREETS CLEAN DAILY AND SWEEP CLEAN WEEKLY. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. GRADING NOTES GENERAL NOTES LEGEND :INLET PROTECTION „„:SILT FENCE :VEHICLE TRACKING PAD ESTIMATED QUANTITY 134 EACH 2 EACH 18,000 FEET SYMBOL DESCRIPTION EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES FOR CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEYING SERVICES CONTACT LANDFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AT 612.252.9070. 1. WA :CONCRETE WASHOUT :EROSION CONTROL BLANKET RPBCWD STANDARD EROSION CONTROL NOTES (CONT.) :DRAINAGE SWALE NATURAL TOPOGRAPHY AND SOIL CONDITIONS MUST BE PROTECTED, INCLUDING RETENTION ONSITE OF NATIVE TOPSOIL TO THE GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE. ADDITIONAL MEASURES, SUCH AS HYDRAULIC MULCHING AND OTHER PRACTICES AS SPECIFIED BY THE DISTRICT MUST BE USED ON SLOPES OF 3:1 (H:V) OR STEEPER TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE STABILIZATION. FINAL SITE STABILIZATION MEASURES MUST SPECIFY THAT AT LEAST SIX INCHES OF TOPSOIL OR ORGANIC MATTER BE SPREAD AND INCORPORATED INTO THE UNDERLYING SOIL DURING FINAL SITE TREATMENT WHEREVER TOPSOIL HAS BEEN REMOVED. CONSTRUCTION SITE WASTE SUCH AS DISCARDED BUILDING MATERIALS, CONCRETE TRUCK WASHOUT, CHEMICALS, LITTER AND SANITARY WASTE MUST BE PROPERLY MANAGED. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS MUST BE MAINTAINED UNTIL COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION AND VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED SUFFICIENTLY TO ENSURE STABILITY OF THE SITE, AS DETERMINED BY THE DISTRICT. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS MUST BE REMOVED UPON FINAL STABILIZATION. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. ALL DISTURBED AREAS MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER LAND-DISTURBING WORK HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED ON A PROPERTY THAT DRAINS TO AN IMPAIRED WATER, WITHIN 14 DAYS ELSEWHERE. SOIL SURFACES COMPACTED DURING CONSTRUCTION AND REMAINING PERVIOUS UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION MUST BE DECOMPACTED THROUGH SOIL AMENDMENT AND/OR RIPPING TO A DEPTH OF 18 INCHES WHILE TAKING CARE TO AVOID UTILITIES, TREE ROOTS AND OTHER EXISTING VEGETATION PRIOR TO FINAL REVEGETATION OR OTHER STABILIZATION. THE PERMITTEE MUST, AT A MINIMUM, INSPECT, MAINTAIN AND REPAIR ALL DISTURBED SURFACES AND ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES AND SOIL STABILIZATION MEASURES EVERY DAY WORK IS PERFORMED ON THE SITE AND AT LEAST WEEKLY UNTIL LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITY HAS CEASED. THEREAFTER, THE PERMITTEE MUST PERFORM THESE RESPONSIBILITIES AT LEAST WEEKLY UNTIL VEGETATIVE COVER IS ESTABLISHED. THE PERMITTEE MUST ALSO PERFORM THESE RESPONSIBILITIES ALSO WITHIN 24-HOURS OF THE END OF ANY 0.5-INCH OR GREATER RAINFALL EVENT UNTIL VEGETATIVE COVER IS ESTABLISHED.THE PERMITTEE WILL MAINTAIN A LOG OF ACTIVITIES UNDER THIS SECTION FOR INSPECTION BY THE DISTRICT ON REQUEST. ACTIVITIES MUST BE CONDUCTED SO AS TO MINIMIZE THE POTENTIAL TRANSFER OF AQUATIC INVASIVE SPECIES (E.G., ZEBRA MUSSELS, EURASIAN WATERMILFOIL, ETC.) TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT POSSIBLE. 27. 28. 29. 30. RPBCWD STANDARD EROSION CONTROL NOTES (CONT.) C301ASCD001.DWG SW PHASE 1 MASS GRADING, DRAINAGE, & EROSION CONTROLC3.1D CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 25, 2018 Subject Website Analytics Overview ­ May 2018 Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: L.1. Prepared By File No:  ATTACHMENTS: Website Analytics Overview ­ May 2018 City of Chanhassen All Web Site Data GO TO REPORT Top Channels Users Conversions Acquisition Behavior Set up a goal. To see outcome metrics, define one or more goals. GET STARTED Conversions Acquisition Overview May 1, 2018 -May 31, 2018 Primary Dimension:Conversion: Edit Channel Grouping To see all 5 Channels click here. Top Channels All Goals Organic Search Direct Referral Social (Other) 20.5% 74.2%  Users  Goal Conversion Rate …May 8 May 15 May 22 May 29 500500 1,0001,000 …May 8 May 15 May 22 May 29 0.00%0.00% 100.00%100.00% 1 Organic Search 2 Direct 3 Referral 4 Social 5 (Other) Users 12,912 New Users 10,797 Sessions 17,452 9,696 2,684 353 337 1 Bounce Rate 57.82% Pages / Session 2.32 Avg. Session Duration 00:02:02 56.09% 64.66% 48.51% 62.42% 100.00% © 2018 Google All Users 100.00% Users City of Chanhassen All Web Site Data GO TO REPORT Page Rows 1 - 10 of 2759 Pages May 1, 2018 -May 31, 2018 Explorer Pageviews Unique Pageviews Avg. Time on Page Entrances Bounce Rate % Exit Page Value 40,459 % of Total:100.00% (40,459) 32,475 % of Total:100.00% (32,475) 00:01:33 Avg for View:00:01:33 (0.00%) 17,452 % of Total:100.00% (17,452) 57.82% Avg for View:57.82% (0.00%) 43.14% Avg for View:43.14% (0.00%) $0.00 % of Total:0.00% ($0.00) 1.6,043 (14.94%) 4,087 (12.59%)00:02:06 3,788 (21.71%)32.60%29.75%$0.00 (0.00%) 2.1,392 (3.44%) 1,118 (3.44%)00:01:17 999 (5.72%)57.26%55.53%$0.00 (0.00%) 3.956 (2.36%) 827 (2.55%)00:01:37 448 (2.57%)84.38%67.89%$0.00 (0.00%) 4.831 (2.05%) 661 (2.04%)00:01:03 239 (1.37%)37.24%32.13%$0.00 (0.00%) 5.820 (2.03%) 684 (2.11%)00:00:49 589 (3.37%)32.26%34.02%$0.00 (0.00%) 6.758 (1.87%) 628 (1.93%)00:03:42 318 (1.82%)84.91%66.23%$0.00 (0.00%) 7.709 (1.75%) 472 (1.45%)00:00:54 131 (0.75%)41.22%22.85%$0.00 (0.00%) 8.556 (1.37%) 427 (1.31%)00:02:21 203 (1.16%)55.17%49.46%$0.00 (0.00%) 9.469 (1.16%) 400 (1.23%)00:03:27 329 (1.89%)82.67%75.91%$0.00 (0.00%) 10.455 (1.12%) 401 (1.23%)00:02:50 177 (1.01%)85.88%69.01%$0.00 (0.00%)  Pageviews …May 8 May 15 May 22 May 29 1,0001,000 2,0002,000 / /284/Lake-Ann-Park /1018/Job-Opportunities /31/Parks-Recreation /296/Recreation-Center /240/Agendas-Minutes-Videos /194/Proposed-Developments /242/City-Code /272/4th-of-July-Celebration /567/Watercraft-Rentals © 2018 Google All Users 100.00% Pageviews City of ChanhassenAll Web Site Data GO TO REPORT Search Term Rows 1 - 10 of 1178 Search Terms May 1, 2018 -May 31, 2018 Explorer Site Usage Total Unique Searches Results Pageviews / Search % Search Exits % Search Refinements Time after Search Avg. Search Depth 1,498 % of Total:100.00% (1,498) 1.26 Avg for View:1.26 (0.00%) 30.24% Avg for View:30.24% (0.00%) 21.05% Avg for View:21.05% (0.00%) 00:02:41 Avg for View:00:02:41 (0.00%) 1.51 Avg for View:1.51 (0.00%) 1.Pickleball 10 (0.67%)1.00 20.00%10.00%00:03:14 1.40 2.zoning map 10 (0.67%)1.50 30.00%26.67%00:02:19 1.30 3.permits 7 (0.47%)1.29 14.29%0.00%00:00:48 2.00 4.Emerald Ash Borer / Insects 6 (0.40%)1.00 0.00%0.00%00:00:35 1.33 5.Noise ordinance 6 (0.40%)1.00 0.00%16.67%00:02:19 2.00 6.pickleball 6 (0.40%)1.50 0.00%55.56%00:01:28 1.17 7.Tball 6 (0.40%)1.00 16.67%16.67%00:00:49 1.83 8.avienda 5 (0.33%)1.40 40.00%0.00%00:02:07 3.00 9.babysitting 5 (0.33%)1.60 20.00%0.00%00:14:00 1.40 10.Babysitting 101 5 (0.33%)1.20 40.00%0.00%00:00:14 0.80  Total Unique Searches …May 8 May 15 May 22 May 29 5050 100100 © 2018 Google All Users 100.00% Total Unique SearchesCity of Chanhassen All Web Site Data GO TO REPORT Rows 1 - 3 of 3 Overview May 1, 2018 -May 31, 2018 Explorer Summary 12,912 % of Total: 100.00% (12,912) 12,912 % of Total: 100.00% (12,912) 1.desktop6,59851.31% 2.mobile5,39441.95% 3.tablet8676.74%  Users …May 8May 15 May 22 May 29 500500 1,0001,000 Device CategoryUsersUsers Contribution to total: Users 6.7% 41.9%51.3% © 2018 Google All Users 100.00% Users City of Chanhassen All Web Site Data GO TO REPORT Rows 1 - 3 of 3 Overview May 1, 2018 -May 31, 2018 Explorer Summary 12,912 % of Total: 100.00% (12,912) 12,912 % of Total: 100.00% (12,912) 1.desktop 6,598 51.31% 2.mobile 5,394 41.95% 3.tablet 867 6.74%  Users …May 8 May 15 May 22 May 29 500500 1,0001,000 Device Category Users Users Contribution to total: Users 6.7% 41.9%51.3% © 2018 Google All Users 100.00% Users MAY 2018 WEBSITE ANALYTICS OVERVIEW City of ChanhassenAll Web Site Data GO TO REPORT Language Users % Users 1.en-us 12,665 97.98% 2.ko 59 0.46% 3.en-gb 49 0.38% 4.fr 40 0.31% 5.es-xl 9 0.07% 6.en 8 0.06% 7.es-es 7 0.05% 8.zh-cn 7 0.05% 9.fr-fr 6 0.05% 10.ru-ru 6 0.05% Audience Overview May 1, 2018 -May 31, 2018 Overview  Sessions  Pageviews …May 8 May 15 May 22 May 29 500500 1,0001,000 1,0001,000 2,0002,000 Users 12,912 New Users 10,797 Sessions 17,452 Number of Sessions per User 1.35 Pageviews 40,459 Pages / Session 2.32 Avg. Session Duration 00:02:02 Bounce Rate 57.82% New Visitor Returning Visitor 24.9% 75.1% © 2018 Google All Users100.00% Users SESSIONS VS. PAGEVIEWS 17,452 Sessions vs. 40,459 Pageviews Session: The period of time a user is actively engaged with our website, app, etc. Pageview: Total # of pages viewed. Repeated views of a single page are counted. HOW ARE THEY FINDING US? 9,696 Organic Search 2,684 Direct 353 Referral 337 Social WHAT ARE THEY USING TO VIEW OUR SITE? WHAT ARE THEY SEARCHING FOR?WHAT PAGES ARE THEY VISITING? NEW VS. RETURNING VISITOR 10,800 New Visitors 3,586 Returning Visitors WHAT CAN WE LEARN? People are already looking into the 4th of July celebration. The Facebook event has reached 14,000 since May 22, with 458 people responding they are going or are interested in the event. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 25, 2018 Subject Municipal Legislative Commission Board of Directors Meeting Agenda June 6, 2018 Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: L.2. Prepared By File No:  ATTACHMENTS: MLC Board of Directors Meeting Agenda June 6, 2018 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 25, 2018 Subject Review of Claims Paid 06­25­2018 Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: L.3. Prepared By Greg Sticha, Finance Director File No:  SUMMARY The following claims are submitted for review on June 25, 2018: Check Numbers Amounts 167200 – 167323 $501,257.77 ACH Payments $1,266,641.44 Total All Claims $1,767,899.21 ATTACHMENTS: Check Summary Check Summary ACH Check Detail Check Detail ACH Accounts Payable User: Printed: dwashburn 6/15/2018 8:18 AM Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount ALLSTR ALLSTREAM 06/07/2018 0.00 490.84167200 ANDESTEP STEPHEN ANDERSON 06/07/2018 0.00 249.03167201 bffas B & F Fastener Supply 06/07/2018 0.00 62.94167202 BCATRA BCA 06/07/2018 0.00 120.00167203 BCATRA BCA 06/07/2018 0.00 64.00167204 BORSTA BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 06/07/2018 0.00 92.57167205 BROAWA BROADWAY AWARDS 06/07/2018 0.00 89.84167206 CDWGOV CDW GOVERNMENT LLC 06/07/2018 0.00 61.04167207 CENENE CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 06/07/2018 0.00 893.17167208 EmbMinn CENTURYLINK 06/07/2018 0.00 1,097.68167209 CHASKA CITY OF CHASKA 06/07/2018 0.00 868.72167210 ISD112 COMMUNITY EDUCATION ISD 112 06/07/2018 0.00 4,454.00167211 DEAAUT DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES 06/07/2018 0.00 819.00167212 EBAKGRAS Grasso Ebako 06/07/2018 0.00 115.00167213 EPIEVE EPIC EVENT RENTAL 06/07/2018 0.00 1,009.25167214 FACMOT FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 06/07/2018 0.00 51.78167215 FESSOU FESTIVAL SOUND AND LIGHTING 06/07/2018 0.00 1,000.00167216 GRELAK GREAT LAKES COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION LLC06/07/2018 0.00 393.88167217 ICMART ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 06/07/2018 0.00 1,445.83167218 Loc49 IUOE Local #49 06/07/2018 0.00 822.80167219 JBEMEC J-BERD MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS 06/07/2018 0.00 67.20167220 METCO2 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 06/07/2018 0.00 152,094.89167221 NCPERS MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 06/07/2018 0.00 112.00167222 NortHome Norton Homes 06/07/2018 0.00 1,000.00167223 ryavos RDV CONSTRUCTION 06/07/2018 0.00 250.00167224 SANTKARI Kari Santos 06/07/2018 0.00 332.45167225 SCHUKARE Karen and Jami Schupp 06/07/2018 0.00 250.00167226 SHOTRU SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 06/07/2018 0.00 103.37167227 SIGNSO SIGNSOURCE 06/07/2018 0.00 248.00167228 STAPRO Stavros Properties 06/07/2018 0.00 498.83167229 SUMCOM Summit Companies 06/07/2018 0.00 5.91167230 TayEle Taylor Electric Company, LLC 06/07/2018 0.00 18,255.00167231 WATHEA Water Heaters Now Inc 06/07/2018 0.00 68.25167232 WhitThom Thomas W. White 06/07/2018 0.00 520.00167233 yard Yardscapes, Inc 06/07/2018 0.00 250.00167234 AANEKATE KATE AANENSON 06/14/2018 0.00 158.39167235 ASPMIL ASPEN MILLS 06/14/2018 0.00 577.94167236 AtlPoo Atlantis Pools 06/14/2018 0.00 2,000.00167237 bffas B & F Fastener Supply 06/14/2018 0.00 47.36167238 BCATRA BCA 06/14/2018 0.00 30.00167239 BluCro BCBSM, Inc.06/14/2018 0.00 81,194.09167240 BENPRO BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC 06/14/2018 0.00 10,650.00167241 BERGGARY GARY BERG 06/14/2018 0.00 284.69167242 BORSTA BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 06/14/2018 0.00 154.91167243 UB*01389 BURNET TITLE LLC 06/14/2018 0.00 117.69167244 CDWGOV CDW GOVERNMENT LLC 06/14/2018 0.00 239.98167245 CEMPRO CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO 06/14/2018 0.00 612.00167246 Page 1AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (6/15/2018 8:18 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount CENENE CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 06/14/2018 0.00 166.17167247 CenLin CenturyLink 06/14/2018 0.00 64.00167248 CHRAXE Christian Axel Landscapes 06/14/2018 0.00 250.00167249 CHAPET CITY OF CHANHASSEN-PETTY CASH 06/14/2018 0.00 76.23167250 CLACCO CLASS C COMPONENTS INC 06/14/2018 0.00 110.02167251 UB*01388 MICHAEL & DAPHNE COHEN 06/14/2018 0.00 26.60167252 CORMAI CORE & MAIN LP 06/14/2018 0.00 1,876.75167253 CUBFOO CUB FOODS 06/14/2018 0.00 10.00167254 UB*01409 CUSTOM HOME BUILDERS TITLE LLC 06/14/2018 0.00 5.08167255 UB*01403 DCA TITLE 06/14/2018 0.00 75.85167256 DEMCON DEM-CON LANDFILL 06/14/2018 0.00 550.52167257 UB*01397 EDGEWATER TITLE GROUP LLC 06/14/2018 0.00 141.78167258 UB*01387 EDINA REALTY TITLE 06/14/2018 0.00 25.85167259 UB*01404 EDINA REALTY TITLE 06/14/2018 0.00 6.72167260 UB*01401 EXECUTIVE TITLE OF MN LLC 06/14/2018 0.00 46.06167261 UB*01396 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE 06/14/2018 0.00 23.40167262 FlePri FleetPride, Inc.06/14/2018 0.00 65.70167263 UB*01393 SHERYL FLUM 06/14/2018 0.00 26.67167264 UB*01408 GLOBAL CLOSING & TITLE SERVICES 06/14/2018 0.00 76.72167265 GOPSPO GOPHER SPORT 06/14/2018 0.00 353.25167266 GUNELE Gunnar Electric Inc 06/14/2018 0.00 50,600.00167267 HARTLIFE Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company06/14/2018 0.00 1,065.62167268 HartCom Hartman Companies 06/14/2018 0.00 17,259.00167269 IKEPLU Ike's Plumbing & Drain Cleaning Inc 06/14/2018 0.00 60.01167270 INTSEC International Security Products 06/14/2018 0.00 1,264.95167271 JenkJoel JOEL JENKINS 06/14/2018 0.00 294.00167272 JHLAR JH LARSON COMPANY 06/14/2018 0.00 137.00167273 josroy Joseph Roy Construction 06/14/2018 0.00 250.00167274 K2Ele K2 Electrical Services Inc 06/14/2018 0.00 3,120.00167275 UB*01391 HOOD & MAUREEN KANAABI 06/14/2018 0.00 19.38167276 KARFAU Karges-Faulconbridge Inc 06/14/2018 0.00 1,425.00167277 KNOBUI KNOBLAUCH BUILDERS LLC 06/14/2018 0.00 2,500.00167278 KOSKDUST DUSTIN KOSKELA 06/14/2018 0.00 88.50167279 LANEQ1 Lano Equipment 06/14/2018 0.00 24.22167280 LEAINS LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 06/14/2018 0.00 110,775.00167281 UB*01406 DENNIS LIDER 06/14/2018 0.00 32.76167282 UB*01394 STEVEN & CAMMIE LILLEHAUG 06/14/2018 0.00 79.88167283 UB*01399 DOUGLAS & LEANNE MACLEAN 06/14/2018 0.00 32.71167284 MadsArle Arlen Madsen 06/14/2018 0.00 30.00167285 MAKIERIK ERIKA MAKI 06/14/2018 0.00 250.00167286 UB*01405 KEVIN & CATHERINE MCKENNA 06/14/2018 0.00 10.10167287 MIDPLA MIDWEST PLAYSCAPES 06/14/2018 0.00 3,625.05167288 MINAIR MINNESOTA AIR 06/14/2018 0.00 180.71167289 MNAGR MINNESOTA DEPT OF AGRICULTURE 06/14/2018 0.00 77.00167290 MJSCON MJS Construction and Remodeling LLC 06/14/2018 0.00 500.00167291 MCMA MN CITY/COUNTY MGMT ASSOC.06/14/2018 0.00 245.00167292 MNPUBL MN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 06/14/2018 0.00 5.00167293 MTIDIS MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 06/14/2018 0.00 260.00167294 NTCHom NTC Homes Inc 06/14/2018 0.00 500.00167295 OKERNORM NORMAN OKERSTROM 06/14/2018 0.00 300.00167296 UB*01400 PILLAR TITLE SERVICES 06/14/2018 0.00 60.41167297 PitBow Pitney Bowes Inc.06/14/2018 0.00 105.00167298 PREMRM PRECISE MRM LLC 06/14/2018 0.00 394.42167299 PribCody Cody Pribble 06/14/2018 0.00 1,067.87167300 RAITRE RAINBOW TREE COMPANY 06/14/2018 0.00 1,585.00167301 RicAla Richard Alan Productions 06/14/2018 0.00 625.00167302 ROSAMATT MATTHEW ROSATI 06/14/2018 0.00 339.23167303 Page 2AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (6/15/2018 8:18 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount UB*01392 CHRISTIAN SCHENK 06/14/2018 0.00 214.79167304 Senja Senja Inc 06/14/2018 0.00 128.00167305 SHEWIL SHERWIN WILLIAMS 06/14/2018 0.00 201.98167306 SIGNSO SIGNSOURCE 06/14/2018 0.00 564.00167307 SITLAN SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 06/14/2018 0.00 204.85167308 UB*01407 CHARLES & STACEY SOHN 06/14/2018 0.00 33.16167309 SOULOC SOUTHWEST LOCK & KEY 06/14/2018 0.00 134.00167310 SOUSUB Southwest Suburban Publishing 06/14/2018 0.00 1,104.80167311 UB*01402 DALE & PAMELA STAHL 06/14/2018 0.00 293.32167312 SupTur Superior Turf Services Inc.06/14/2018 0.00 780.00167313 SWAHOM SWANSON HOMES 06/14/2018 0.00 1,000.00167314 TheGar The Garden By The Woods 06/14/2018 0.00 141.00167315 UB*01395 JOHN THOMPSON 06/14/2018 0.00 22.16167316 UB*01390 TITLE CHOICE LLC 06/14/2018 0.00 215.45167317 TopAll Top-All Roofing Inc 06/14/2018 0.00 1,104.75167318 TOWFEN TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE 06/14/2018 0.00 2,300.00167319 UB*01398 TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES INC 06/14/2018 0.00 78.11167320 UnitRent United Rentals (North America), Inc.06/14/2018 0.00 2,857.11167321 WastMana Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 06/14/2018 0.00 1,460.78167322 WhitThom Thomas W. White 06/14/2018 0.00 930.00167323 Report Total (124 checks): 501,257.77 0.00 Page 3AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (6/15/2018 8:18 AM) Accounts Payable Checks by Date - Summary by Check User: dwashburn Printed: 6/15/2018 8:19 AM Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH ADAPES ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC 06/07/2018 0.00 125.00 ACH AlHiJuli Juli Al-Hilwani 06/07/2018 0.00 431.25 ACH ANCTEC ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 06/07/2018 0.00 253.00 ACH CCPNIM CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 06/07/2018 0.00 7,289.79 ACH GENPAR GENERAL PARTS LLC 06/07/2018 0.00 384.00 ACH GOPSTA GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 06/07/2018 0.00 1,568.70 ACH InnOff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 06/07/2018 0.00 341.69 ACH JOHSUP JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 06/07/2018 0.00 280.66 ACH MACEQU MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 06/07/2018 0.00 281.98 ACH Marco Marco Inc 06/07/2018 0.00 925.65 ACH MINCON SUMMIT COMPANIES 06/07/2018 0.00 330.00 ACH MinPum Minnesota Pump Works 06/07/2018 0.00 11,210.56 ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 06/07/2018 0.00 6,038.18 ACH NAPA NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 06/07/2018 0.00 13.56 ACH PotMN Potentia MN Solar 06/07/2018 0.00 9,465.65 ACH ProTec Pro-Tec Design, Inc. 06/07/2018 0.00 8,892.00 ACH RBMSER RBM SERVICES INC 06/07/2018 0.00 4,457.62 ACH STREIC STREICHER'S 06/07/2018 0.00 89.97 ACH UNIWAY UNITED WAY 06/07/2018 0.00 28.40 ACH VERIZO VERIZON WIRELESS 06/07/2018 0.00 4,390.13 ACH WATSON WATSON COMPANY 06/07/2018 0.00 219.26 ACH WWGRA WW GRAINGER INC 06/07/2018 0.00 59.27 ACH ADAPES ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC 06/14/2018 0.00 250.00 ACH AMESOL AMERICAN SOLUTIONS 06/14/2018 0.00 1,794.16 ACH BATPLU BATTERIES PLUS 06/14/2018 0.00 287.84 ACH CAMKNU CAMPBELL KNUTSON 06/14/2018 0.00 17,233.78 ACH CRYINF Crystal Infosystems LLC 06/14/2018 0.00 245.95 ACH engwat Engel Water Testing Inc 06/14/2018 0.00 520.00 ACH FASCOM FASTENAL COMPANY 06/14/2018 0.00 255.59 ACH GMHASP GMH ASPHALT CORP 06/14/2018 0.00 113,061.08 ACH HAWCHE HAWKINS CHEMICAL 06/14/2018 0.00 210.00 ACH HOIKOE HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 06/14/2018 0.00 2,895.00 ACH InnOff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 06/14/2018 0.00 89.09 ACH MACEQU MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 06/14/2018 0.00 735.29 ACH MasEle Master Electric Co. Inc. 06/14/2018 0.00 960.00 ACH MatTri Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc. 06/14/2018 0.00 176.07 ACH MERACE MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 06/14/2018 0.00 2,626.99 ACH METCO Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 06/14/2018 0.00 218,953.35 ACH MINCON SUMMIT COMPANIES 06/14/2018 0.00 2,060.00 ACH MinPum Minnesota Pump Works 06/14/2018 0.00 584.90 ACH MNLABO MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 06/14/2018 0.00 5,524.36 ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 06/14/2018 0.00 158.43 ACH NAPA NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 06/14/2018 0.00 106.18 ACH PARCON PARROTT CONTRACTING INC 06/14/2018 0.00 10,479.31 ACH PinPro Pine Products Inc 06/14/2018 0.00 902.00 Page 1 of 2 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH PLAYPO PLAYPOWER LT FARMINGTON INC 06/14/2018 0.00 45,000.00 ACH PreWat Premium Waters, Inc 06/14/2018 0.00 82.69 ACH PRTURF PRO TURF 06/14/2018 0.00 2,083.00 ACH RICLAK RICE LAKE CONSTRUCTION GROUP 06/14/2018 0.00 775,386.20 ACH SPSCOM SPS COMPANIES INC 06/14/2018 0.00 46.00 ACH SUBCHE SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 06/14/2018 0.00 521.47 ACH TWISEE TWIN CITY SEED CO. 06/14/2018 0.00 643.20 ACH UniFar United Farmers Cooperative 06/14/2018 0.00 58.32 ACH WATSON WATSON COMPANY 06/14/2018 0.00 326.22 ACH WMMUE WM MUELLER & SONS INC 06/14/2018 0.00 3,521.68 ACH WWGRA WW GRAINGER INC 06/14/2018 0.00 18.64 ACH ZARBRU ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC 06/14/2018 0.00 1,398.00 ACH ZIEGLE ZIEGLER INC 06/14/2018 0.00 370.33 Report Total: 0.00 1,266,641.44 Page 2 of 2 Accounts Payable Check Detail-Checks User: dwashburn Printed: 06/15/2018 - 8:20 AM Name Check D Account Description Amount AANENSON KATE 06/14/2018 101-1420-4370 Mileage - 1/18/18 to 6/1/18 158.39 AANENSON KATE 158.39 ALLSTREAM 06/07/2018 101-1160-4300 phone system maintenance - 7/18/18-8/17/18 490.84 ALLSTREAM 490.84 ANDERSON STEPHEN 06/07/2018 101-1220-4370 Training Supplies for Live Burn - food 249.03 ANDERSON STEPHEN 249.03 ASPEN MILLS 06/14/2018 101-1220-4240 White Shirts w/patches swen on 97.58 ASPEN MILLS 06/14/2018 101-1220-4240 Navy Shirts w/patches swen on and Jacket, name tag 268.13 ASPEN MILLS 06/14/2018 101-1220-4240 Pants, Navy Shirts w/patches, name tag 212.23 ASPEN MILLS 577.94 Atlantis Pools 06/14/2018 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow - 6845 Lake Harrison Circle 2,000.00 Atlantis Pools 2,000.00 B & F Fastener Supply 06/07/2018 101-1550-4120 GR5 ZINC, CARRIAGE BOLT 16.64 B & F Fastener Supply 06/07/2018 101-1550-4120 FLANGE NYLOCK NUT 46.30 B & F Fastener Supply 06/14/2018 101-1320-4120 misc parts/supplies 36.06 B & F Fastener Supply 06/14/2018 700-0000-4120 misc parts/supplies 11.30 B & F Fastener Supply 110.30 BCA 06/07/2018 101-1120-4300 Background Investigation 120.00 BCA 06/07/2018 101-1220-4300 Firefighter Background Investigation 64.00 BCA 06/14/2018 101-1120-4300 background investigation 30.00 BCA 214.00 BCBSM, Inc.06/14/2018 101-0000-2012 July Family 43,840.90 BCBSM, Inc.06/14/2018 101-0000-2012 July Family - Cobra 1,748.74 BCBSM, Inc.06/14/2018 700-0000-2012 July Family 6,522.81 BCBSM, Inc.06/14/2018 701-0000-2012 July Family 4,774.07 BCBSM, Inc.06/14/2018 720-0000-2012 July Family 2,570.64 BCBSM, Inc.06/14/2018 101-0000-2012 July Single 15,323.64 BCBSM, Inc.06/14/2018 210-0000-2012 July Single 874.64 BCBSM, Inc.06/14/2018 700-0000-2012 July Single 2,361.52 BCBSM, Inc.06/14/2018 701-0000-2012 July Single 1,661.81 BCBSM, Inc.06/14/2018 720-0000-2012 July Single 1,469.40 BCBSM, Inc.06/14/2018 101-1220-4483 July Firefighter EAP 45.92 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (06/15/2018 - 8:20 AM)Page 1 of 12 Name Check D Account Description Amount BCBSM, Inc. 81,194.09 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC 06/14/2018 410-0000-4710 Landscape Commercial - Foxwoods Trail Project 10,500.00 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC 06/14/2018 101-1550-4300 Spring Clean Up Services - Round-Abouts, Hwy 101&61, Bluffcreek 150.00 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC 10,650.00 BERG GARY 06/14/2018 101-1550-4240 Pants, boots 284.69 BERG GARY 284.69 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 06/07/2018 101-1220-4510 Lamps 92.57 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 06/14/2018 701-0000-4530 Replacement Melting Alloy Overload Relays 154.91 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 247.48 BROADWAY AWARDS 06/07/2018 101-1110-4375 8x10 Walnut Plaque 89.84 BROADWAY AWARDS 89.84 BURNET TITLE LLC 06/14/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 65.19 BURNET TITLE LLC 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 46.09 BURNET TITLE LLC 06/14/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.80 BURNET TITLE LLC 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.61 BURNET TITLE LLC 117.69 CDW GOVERNMENT LLC 06/07/2018 400-4126-4703 Fiber Patch Cable, LC SC 1M Single Mode 61.04 CDW GOVERNMENT LLC 06/14/2018 400-4126-4703 Patch Panel, Network Jack 239.98 CDW GOVERNMENT LLC 301.02 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO 06/14/2018 700-0000-4550 980 Chan Hills Dr N - 3A32 3900 PSI 6BG 3/4 612.00 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO 612.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 06/07/2018 101-1370-4320 gas charges 219.53 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 06/07/2018 700-0000-4320 gas charges 27.44 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 06/07/2018 701-0000-4320 gas charges 27.44 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 06/07/2018 101-1600-4320 gas charges 16.98 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 06/07/2018 701-0000-4320 gas charges 20.60 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 06/07/2018 101-1190-4320 gas charges 280.18 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 06/07/2018 101-1550-4320 gas charges 57.71 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 06/07/2018 700-0000-4320 gas charges 16.98 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 06/07/2018 700-7019-4320 gas charges 131.12 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 06/07/2018 101-1170-4320 gas charges 95.19 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 06/14/2018 101-1220-4320 monthly charges 4/26/18-5/25/18 101.23 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 06/14/2018 101-1530-4320 monthly charges 4/26/18-5/25/18 46.74 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 06/14/2018 101-1120-4320 monthly charges 4/26/18-5/25/18 18.20 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 1,059.34 CenturyLink 06/14/2018 700-0000-4310 Monthly service June 2018 32.00 CenturyLink 06/14/2018 701-0000-4310 Monthly service June 2018 32.00 CENTURYLINK 06/07/2018 101-1170-4310 phone charges May 2018 815.96 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (06/15/2018 - 8:20 AM)Page 2 of 12 Name Check D Account Description Amount CENTURYLINK 06/07/2018 700-0000-4310 phone charges May 2018 6.36 CENTURYLINK 06/07/2018 701-0000-4310 phone charges May 2018 6.36 CENTURYLINK 06/07/2018 101-1550-4310 phone charges May 2018 30.04 CENTURYLINK 06/07/2018 101-1350-4310 phone charges May 2018 30.04 CENTURYLINK 06/07/2018 101-1220-4310 phone charges May 2018 33.04 CENTURYLINK 06/07/2018 101-1370-4310 phone charges May 2018 50.88 CENTURYLINK 06/07/2018 101-1160-4320 phone charges May 2018 125.00 CENTURYLINK 1,161.68 Christian Axel Landscapes 06/14/2018 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow - 10440 Bluff Circle 250.00 Christian Axel Landscapes 250.00 CITY OF CHANHASSEN-PETTY CASH 06/14/2018 700-7047-4300 Surcharge-Treatment Plant 0.25 CITY OF CHANHASSEN-PETTY CASH 06/14/2018 400-4008-4706 Surcharge-Park Shelter 4.50 CITY OF CHANHASSEN-PETTY CASH 06/14/2018 101-1540-4300 Boat tabs - Lk Ann 41.50 CITY OF CHANHASSEN-PETTY CASH 06/14/2018 101-1170-4110 Dist. Water 1.98 CITY OF CHANHASSEN-PETTY CASH 06/14/2018 101-1370-4440 License fees 10.00 CITY OF CHANHASSEN-PETTY CASH 06/14/2018 700-7047-4300 Surcharge - Treatment Plant 2.50 CITY OF CHANHASSEN-PETTY CASH 06/14/2018 701-7025-4300 Surcharge - Lift Station 24 15.50 CITY OF CHANHASSEN-PETTY CASH 76.23 CITY OF CHASKA 06/07/2018 101-1560-4300 Trip to Starland/Ole & Lena-Dessert & Entertainment 868.72 CITY OF CHASKA 868.72 CLASS C COMPONENTS INC 06/14/2018 101-1320-4240 Earplugs 110.02 CLASS C COMPONENTS INC 110.02 COHEN MICHAEL & DAPHNE 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 7.18 COHEN MICHAEL & DAPHNE 06/14/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 17.86 COHEN MICHAEL & DAPHNE 06/14/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.32 COHEN MICHAEL & DAPHNE 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.24 COHEN MICHAEL & DAPHNE 26.60 COMMUNITY EDUCATION ISD 112 06/07/2018 101-1530-4300 Dance for Fun Recital - 5/1/18-5/15/18 4,454.00 COMMUNITY EDUCATION ISD 112 4,454.00 CORE & MAIN LP 06/14/2018 700-0000-4550 Snake Pit Roadway Box - Water 384.75 CORE & MAIN LP 06/14/2018 700-0000-4550 12GA Superflex Blue Wire Spools, Snakebite 3W Lock Conn 12G 1,492.00 CORE & MAIN LP 1,876.75 CUB FOODS 06/14/2018 101-1220-4370 Water 10.00 CUB FOODS 10.00 CUSTOM HOME BUILDERS TITLE LLC 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 5.08 CUSTOM HOME BUILDERS TITLE LLC 5.08 DCA TITLE 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 24.26 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (06/15/2018 - 8:20 AM)Page 3 of 12 Name Check D Account Description Amount DCA TITLE 06/14/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 35.83 DCA TITLE 06/14/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 13.40 DCA TITLE 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.36 DCA TITLE 75.85 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES 06/07/2018 422-0000-4704 #206 2018 Chev Tahoe - installed 2 way remote start 409.50 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES 06/07/2018 422-0000-4704 #205 2018 Chev Tahoe - installed 2 way remote start 409.50 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES 819.00 DEM-CON LANDFILL 06/14/2018 101-1320-4150 Street Sweepings 550.52 DEM-CON LANDFILL 550.52 Ebako Grasso 06/07/2018 101-1541-3634 Picnic Refund 115.00 Ebako Grasso 115.00 EDGEWATER TITLE GROUP LLC 06/14/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 77.00 EDGEWATER TITLE GROUP LLC 06/14/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 15.89 EDGEWATER TITLE GROUP LLC 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.80 EDGEWATER TITLE GROUP LLC 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 46.09 EDGEWATER TITLE GROUP LLC 141.78 EDINA REALTY TITLE 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 10.34 EDINA REALTY TITLE 06/14/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 13.85 EDINA REALTY TITLE 06/14/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.82 EDINA REALTY TITLE 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.84 EDINA REALTY TITLE 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.29 EDINA REALTY TITLE 06/14/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.16 EDINA REALTY TITLE 06/14/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.93 EDINA REALTY TITLE 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.34 EDINA REALTY TITLE 32.57 EPIC EVENT RENTAL 06/07/2018 101-1600-4130 Chairs 1,009.25 EPIC EVENT RENTAL 1,009.25 EXECUTIVE TITLE OF MN LLC 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 13.69 EXECUTIVE TITLE OF MN LLC 06/14/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 29.73 EXECUTIVE TITLE OF MN LLC 06/14/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.81 EXECUTIVE TITLE OF MN LLC 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.83 EXECUTIVE TITLE OF MN LLC 46.06 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 06/07/2018 101-1550-4120 DEL 24A 888863812 C600 R113 65.22 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 06/07/2018 101-1320-4120 DEL 334-2406A Alternator -13.44 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 51.78 FESTIVAL SOUND AND LIGHTING 06/07/2018 101-1600-4300 Audio equipment:Sound System 1,000.00 FESTIVAL SOUND AND LIGHTING 1,000.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (06/15/2018 - 8:20 AM)Page 4 of 12 Name Check D Account Description Amount FIRST AMERICAN TITLE 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 6.72 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE 06/14/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 13.37 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE 06/14/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.81 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.50 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE 23.40 FleetPride, Inc.06/14/2018 101-1320-4120 Stainless Lap Joint Clamp -31.70 FleetPride, Inc.06/14/2018 101-1320-4120 Stainless Lap Joint Clamp 97.40 FleetPride, Inc. 65.70 FLUM SHERYL 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 8.05 FLUM SHERYL 06/14/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 18.62 FLUM SHERYL 26.67 GLOBAL CLOSING & TITLE SERVICES 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 21.71 GLOBAL CLOSING & TITLE SERVICES 06/14/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 36.77 GLOBAL CLOSING & TITLE SERVICES 06/14/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 15.51 GLOBAL CLOSING & TITLE SERVICES 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.73 GLOBAL CLOSING & TITLE SERVICES 76.72 GOPHER SPORT 06/14/2018 101-1616-4130 Dodgeballs, Volleyballs, soccer ball, Mesh bags 353.25 GOPHER SPORT 353.25 GREAT LAKES COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION LLC06/07/2018 101-1540-4130 Water, Sports drinks, Fruit/Veg drinks 393.88 GREAT LAKES COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION LLC 393.88 Gunnar Electric Inc 06/14/2018 410-0000-4706 Installation of Baseball Field Lighting System 50,600.00 Gunnar Electric Inc 50,600.00 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 06/14/2018 101-1420-4040 June 2018 insurance premium 73.63 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 06/14/2018 101-1430-4040 June 2018 insurance premium 4.67 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 06/14/2018 210-0000-4040 June 2018 insurance premium 17.84 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 06/14/2018 720-7201-4040 June 2018 insurance premium 5.51 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 06/14/2018 720-7202-4040 June 2018 insurance premium 5.51 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 06/14/2018 101-1170-4040 June 2018 insurance premium 12.37 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 06/14/2018 101-1220-4040 June 2018 insurance premium 42.30 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 06/14/2018 701-0000-4040 June 2018 insurance premium 79.49 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 06/14/2018 700-0000-4040 June 2018 insurance premium 105.31 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 06/14/2018 720-0000-4040 June 2018 insurance premium 37.48 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 06/14/2018 101-1120-4040 June 2018 insurance premium 69.45 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 06/14/2018 101-1130-4040 June 2018 insurance premium 47.83 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 06/14/2018 101-1160-4040 June 2018 insurance premium 24.74 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 06/14/2018 101-1250-4040 June 2018 insurance premium 106.89 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 06/14/2018 101-1310-4040 June 2018 insurance premium 80.37 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 06/14/2018 101-1320-4040 June 2018 insurance premium 112.35 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 06/14/2018 101-1370-4040 June 2018 insurance premium 44.79 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 06/14/2018 101-1520-4040 June 2018 insurance premium 35.08 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 06/14/2018 101-1530-4040 June 2018 insurance premium 14.05 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 06/14/2018 101-1560-4040 June 2018 insurance premium 13.87 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (06/15/2018 - 8:20 AM)Page 5 of 12 Name Check D Account Description Amount Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 06/14/2018 101-1600-4040 June 2018 insurance premium 22.34 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 06/14/2018 101-1700-4040 June 2018 insurance premium 5.59 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 06/14/2018 101-1550-4040 June 2018 insurance premium 104.16 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 1,065.62 Hartman Companies 06/14/2018 101-1550-4150 2018 Lake Ann tree removal/install - top soil for fill 2,750.00 Hartman Companies 06/14/2018 410-0000-4701 2018 Lake Ann tree removal/install - Tree Removal, 6' Clump 14,509.00 Hartman Companies 17,259.00 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 06/07/2018 101-0000-2009 06/08/2018 #304303 1,114.57 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 06/07/2018 210-0000-2009 06/08/2018 #304303 25.00 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 06/07/2018 700-0000-2009 06/08/2018 #304303 152.52 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 06/07/2018 701-0000-2009 06/08/2018 #304303 152.47 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 06/07/2018 720-0000-2009 06/08/2018 #304303 1.27 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 1,445.83 Ike's Plumbing & Drain Cleaning Inc 06/14/2018 101-0000-2033 2018-01386 overpayment-refund 60.01 Ike's Plumbing & Drain Cleaning Inc 60.01 International Security Products 06/14/2018 101-1550-4150 Fence parts 1,264.95 International Security Products 1,264.95 IUOE Local #49 06/07/2018 101-0000-2004 PR Batch 00408.06.2018 Local 49 dues 476.09 IUOE Local #49 06/07/2018 700-0000-2004 PR Batch 00408.06.2018 Local 49 dues 193.58 IUOE Local #49 06/07/2018 701-0000-2004 PR Batch 00408.06.2018 Local 49 dues 118.63 IUOE Local #49 06/07/2018 101-0000-2004 PR Batch 00408.06.2018 Local 49 dues 34.50 IUOE Local #49 822.80 J-BERD MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS 06/07/2018 101-0000-2033 2018-00554 refund 20.24 J-BERD MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS 06/07/2018 101-0000-2033 2018-00556 refund 46.96 J-BERD MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS 67.20 JENKINS JOEL 06/14/2018 101-1766-4300 Adult Softball Umpire 294.00 JENKINS JOEL 294.00 JH LARSON COMPANY 06/14/2018 101-1170-4510 Fluorescent Lamp 137.00 JH LARSON COMPANY 137.00 Joseph Roy Construction 06/14/2018 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow - 981 Saddlebrook Trail 250.00 Joseph Roy Construction 250.00 K2 Electrical Services Inc 06/14/2018 101-1550-4300 move existing 200 amp service/panel to new location 3,120.00 K2 Electrical Services Inc 3,120.00 KANAABI HOOD & MAUREEN 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 6.11 KANAABI HOOD & MAUREEN 06/14/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 7.79 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (06/15/2018 - 8:20 AM)Page 6 of 12 Name Check D Account Description Amount KANAABI HOOD & MAUREEN 06/14/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 4.66 KANAABI HOOD & MAUREEN 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.82 KANAABI HOOD & MAUREEN 19.38 Karges-Faulconbridge Inc 06/14/2018 410-0000-4706 Lake Susan Ballfield Lighting Design 1,425.00 Karges-Faulconbridge Inc 1,425.00 KNOBLAUCH BUILDERS LLC 06/14/2018 815-8226-2024 As-Built Escrow - 260 Preserve Court 2,500.00 KNOBLAUCH BUILDERS LLC 2,500.00 KOSKELA DUSTIN 06/14/2018 101-1550-4240 Clothing Reimbursement - Columbia pants 88.50 KOSKELA DUSTIN 88.50 Lano Equipment 06/14/2018 101-1320-4120 Bars 24.22 Lano Equipment 24.22 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 06/14/2018 101-1170-4483 General Liability Acct# 10002587 46,616.00 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 06/14/2018 101-1170-4483 Work Comp Acct# 40001925 64,159.00 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 110,775.00 LIDER DENNIS 06/14/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 4.61 LIDER DENNIS 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.81 LIDER DENNIS 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 9.58 LIDER DENNIS 06/14/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 17.76 LIDER DENNIS 32.76 LILLEHAUG STEVEN & CAMMIE 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 24.96 LILLEHAUG STEVEN & CAMMIE 06/14/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 42.18 LILLEHAUG STEVEN & CAMMIE 06/14/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 10.83 LILLEHAUG STEVEN & CAMMIE 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.91 LILLEHAUG STEVEN & CAMMIE 79.88 MACLEAN DOUGLAS & LEANNE 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 10.06 MACLEAN DOUGLAS & LEANNE 06/14/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 19.47 MACLEAN DOUGLAS & LEANNE 06/14/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.70 MACLEAN DOUGLAS & LEANNE 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.48 MACLEAN DOUGLAS & LEANNE 32.71 Madsen Arlen 06/14/2018 101-1250-4360 License Renewal-MN Dept of Labor and Industry 30.00 Madsen Arlen 30.00 MAKI ERIKA 06/14/2018 815-8201-2024 Landscape Escrow - 1616 W 63rd St 250.00 MAKI ERIKA 250.00 MCKENNA KEVIN & CATHERINE 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.30 MCKENNA KEVIN & CATHERINE 06/14/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 5.64 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (06/15/2018 - 8:20 AM)Page 7 of 12 Name Check D Account Description Amount MCKENNA KEVIN & CATHERINE 06/14/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.99 MCKENNA KEVIN & CATHERINE 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.17 MCKENNA KEVIN & CATHERINE 10.10 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 06/07/2018 701-0000-4509 Waste Water Services - July 2018 152,094.89 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 152,094.89 MIDWEST PLAYSCAPES 06/14/2018 101-1550-4530 Accessible Swing Seat 825.05 MIDWEST PLAYSCAPES 06/14/2018 400-4008-4706 Engineered Wood Fiber 2,800.00 MIDWEST PLAYSCAPES 3,625.05 MINNESOTA AIR 06/14/2018 101-1370-4510 Condensate Pump 230V-DFS 180.71 MINNESOTA AIR 180.71 MINNESOTA DEPT OF AGRICULTURE 06/14/2018 101-1540-4300 2019 Lake Ann Concession Food License 77.00 MINNESOTA DEPT OF AGRICULTURE 77.00 MJS Construction and Remodeling LLC 06/14/2018 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow - 6520 Welsley Ct 500.00 MJS Construction and Remodeling LLC 500.00 MN CITY/COUNTY MGMT ASSOC.06/14/2018 101-1120-4360 Membership Renewal - C. Petersen 245.00 MN CITY/COUNTY MGMT ASSOC. 245.00 MN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 06/14/2018 101-1120-4300 MN Crash Record Request - Hwy 5 Carver 4/24/18 5.00 MN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 5.00 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 06/07/2018 101-0000-2011 PR Batch 00408.06.2018 NCPERS-Life Insurance 76.01 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 06/07/2018 700-0000-2011 PR Batch 00408.06.2018 NCPERS-Life Insurance 9.59 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 06/07/2018 701-0000-2011 PR Batch 00408.06.2018 NCPERS-Life Insurance 9.60 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 06/07/2018 720-0000-2011 PR Batch 00408.06.2018 NCPERS-Life Insurance 16.80 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 112.00 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 06/14/2018 101-1550-4300 Irrig. Field Service 260.00 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 260.00 Norton Homes 06/07/2018 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow(Demo)- 2921 Washta Bay Rd 1,000.00 Norton Homes 1,000.00 NTC Homes Inc 06/14/2018 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow - 711 Sierra Trail 500.00 NTC Homes Inc 500.00 OKERSTROM NORMAN 06/14/2018 101-1600-4370 Heart Saver CPR Class 300.00 OKERSTROM NORMAN 300.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (06/15/2018 - 8:20 AM)Page 8 of 12 Name Check D Account Description Amount PILLAR TITLE SERVICES 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 12.56 PILLAR TITLE SERVICES 06/14/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 31.81 PILLAR TITLE SERVICES 06/14/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 13.64 PILLAR TITLE SERVICES 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.40 PILLAR TITLE SERVICES 60.41 Pitney Bowes Inc.06/14/2018 101-1120-4410 meter rental - 4/1/18 to 6/30/18 105.00 Pitney Bowes Inc. 105.00 PRECISE MRM LLC 06/14/2018 101-1320-4310 pooled data plan/network access fee 394.42 PRECISE MRM LLC 394.42 Pribble Cody 06/14/2018 101-1220-4370 Hennepin Technical College books and classes 1,067.87 Pribble Cody 1,067.87 RAINBOW TREE COMPANY 06/14/2018 720-7202-4300 Bluff Creek Elem Apple Spray 640.00 RAINBOW TREE COMPANY 06/14/2018 720-7202-4300 Lake Ann Park oak treatment 945.00 RAINBOW TREE COMPANY 1,585.00 RDV CONSTRUCTION 06/07/2018 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow - 2308 Boulder Rd 250.00 RDV CONSTRUCTION 250.00 Richard Alan Productions 06/14/2018 101-1620-4300 Summer Concert Series - Teddy Bear Band 625.00 Richard Alan Productions 625.00 ROSATI MATTHEW 06/14/2018 101-1220-4370 5/21/18 Training - CPR instructor 339.23 ROSATI MATTHEW 339.23 Santos Kari 06/07/2018 101-1120-4380 Mileage - Finalist Interview 332.45 Santos Kari 332.45 SCHENK CHRISTIAN 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 93.22 SCHENK CHRISTIAN 06/14/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 121.57 SCHENK CHRISTIAN 214.79 Schupp Karen and Jami 06/07/2018 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow - 95 Cascade Circle 250.00 Schupp Karen and Jami 250.00 Senja Inc 06/14/2018 101-1539-4300 Tai Chi instruction 128.00 Senja Inc 128.00 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 06/14/2018 101-1220-4510 Paint-bathroom match 33.76 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 06/14/2018 101-1190-4510 Paint and recycling fee 94.60 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 06/14/2018 101-1190-4510 Paint and recycling fee 36.81 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 06/14/2018 101-1190-4510 Paint and recycling fee 36.81 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (06/15/2018 - 8:20 AM)Page 9 of 12 Name Check D Account Description Amount SHERWIN WILLIAMS 201.98 SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 06/07/2018 101-1190-4510 Washers 18.99 SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 06/07/2018 101-1370-4150 Shop Vac, Salt 64.92 SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 06/07/2018 101-1190-4510 Lime-A-Way 14.98 SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 06/07/2018 101-1190-4510 Bungee Cord, Screw Eye 4.48 SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 103.37 SIGNSOURCE 06/07/2018 101-1600-4130 Fox Woods Preserve Trail maps 248.00 SIGNSOURCE 06/14/2018 101-1220-4120 Helmet Graphics & Accountability Boards 564.00 SIGNSOURCE 812.00 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 06/14/2018 101-1550-4151 18 Gauge 13 St 250 Ft Black HD Multi Wir Key for 55QCV Rainbird 204.85 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 204.85 SOHN CHARLES & STACEY 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.19 SOHN CHARLES & STACEY 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 8.76 SOHN CHARLES & STACEY 06/14/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 16.45 SOHN CHARLES & STACEY 06/14/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 6.76 SOHN CHARLES & STACEY 33.16 SOUTHWEST LOCK & KEY 06/14/2018 101-1550-4510 10 Original Keys 134.00 SOUTHWEST LOCK & KEY 134.00 Southwest Suburban Publishing 06/14/2018 101-1110-4340 printing/advertising 57.60 Southwest Suburban Publishing 06/14/2018 101-1410-4340 printing/advertising 80.00 Southwest Suburban Publishing 06/14/2018 101-1600-4340 printing/advertising 789.60 Southwest Suburban Publishing 06/14/2018 720-7202-4340 printing/advertising 177.60 Southwest Suburban Publishing 1,104.80 STAHL DALE & PAMELA 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 105.23 STAHL DALE & PAMELA 06/14/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 168.11 STAHL DALE & PAMELA 06/14/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 16.98 STAHL DALE & PAMELA 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.00 STAHL DALE & PAMELA 293.32 Stavros Properties 06/07/2018 101-1550-4300 Q1 2018 Easement fees for property adjacent to 7805 Great Plains 498.83 Stavros Properties 498.83 Summit Companies 06/07/2018 101-0000-2033 2018-01265 overpayment refund 5.91 Summit Companies 5.91 Superior Turf Services Inc.06/14/2018 101-1550-4150 Elite Landscape 780.00 Superior Turf Services Inc. 780.00 SWANSON HOMES 06/14/2018 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow - 10380 Heidi Lane 1,000.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (06/15/2018 - 8:20 AM)Page 10 of 12 Name Check D Account Description Amount SWANSON HOMES 1,000.00 Taylor Electric Company, LLC 06/07/2018 101-1350-4565 Troubleshoot and correct countdown pedestrian heads 450.00 Taylor Electric Company, LLC 06/07/2018 101-1350-4565 Remove damaged light pole, straighten base and install pole 2,400.00 Taylor Electric Company, LLC 06/07/2018 101-1350-4565 Diagnose and repair street lights on Crossroads near Lyman Blvd 1,135.00 Taylor Electric Company, LLC 06/07/2018 101-1350-4565 Repair street lights on Great Plains Blvd and Laredo 1,515.00 Taylor Electric Company, LLC 06/07/2018 101-1350-4565 Replace damaged signal heads and pole bracketing on pole 2,650.00 Taylor Electric Company, LLC 06/07/2018 101-1350-4565 Remove and Reinstall Street Light Pole for Excavation Crew 885.00 Taylor Electric Company, LLC 06/07/2018 101-1350-4565 Repair street lighting on Audubon Rd 1,025.00 Taylor Electric Company, LLC 06/07/2018 101-1350-4565 Diagnose and repair street lighting/Replace main breaker 850.00 Taylor Electric Company, LLC 06/07/2018 101-1350-4565 Install city supplied decorative light pole/Crossroads & Lyman 850.00 Taylor Electric Company, LLC 06/07/2018 101-1350-4565 Repair signal system at 78th Kerber 6,495.00 Taylor Electric Company, LLC 18,255.00 The Garden By The Woods 06/14/2018 101-1550-4150 Ornamental, Annuals 141.00 The Garden By The Woods 141.00 THOMPSON JOHN 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 10.67 THOMPSON JOHN 06/14/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 10.75 THOMPSON JOHN 06/14/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.24 THOMPSON JOHN 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.50 THOMPSON JOHN 22.16 TITLE CHOICE LLC 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 107.58 TITLE CHOICE LLC 06/14/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 88.36 TITLE CHOICE LLC 06/14/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 16.57 TITLE CHOICE LLC 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.94 TITLE CHOICE LLC 215.45 Top-All Roofing Inc 06/14/2018 400-4003-4706 Fire Dept - installed one 10" cone on shingle roof/covered 1,104.75 Top-All Roofing Inc 1,104.75 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE 06/14/2018 101-1550-4300 Repair top rail and fabric - Lake Susan Ballfield 2,300.00 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE 2,300.00 TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES INC 06/14/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 37.10 TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES INC 06/14/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 41.01 TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES INC 78.11 United Rentals (North America), Inc.06/14/2018 720-7025-4751 Lake Lucy Lane Culvert fix 1,556.26 United Rentals (North America), Inc.06/14/2018 720-7025-4751 Lake Lucy Lane Culvert fix 1,300.85 United Rentals (North America), Inc. 2,857.11 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 06/14/2018 101-1550-4350 garbage service - June 2018 375.65 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 06/14/2018 101-1370-4350 garbage service - June 2018 93.23 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 06/14/2018 700-0000-4350 garbage service - June 2018 11.66 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 06/14/2018 701-0000-4350 garbage service - June 2018 11.66 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (06/15/2018 - 8:20 AM)Page 11 of 12 Name Check D Account Description Amount Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 06/14/2018 101-1190-4350 garbage service 212.18 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 06/14/2018 101-1220-4350 garbage service 26.25 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 06/14/2018 101-1220-4350 garbage service 67.89 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 06/14/2018 101-1170-4350 garbage service 173.94 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 06/14/2018 101-1370-4350 garbage service - May 2018 93.23 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 06/14/2018 700-0000-4350 garbage service - May 2018 11.66 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 06/14/2018 701-0000-4350 garbage service - May 2018 11.66 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 06/14/2018 101-1550-4350 garbage service - May 2018 371.77 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 1,460.78 Water Heaters Now Inc 06/07/2018 101-1250-3306 2018-01107 refund 68.25 Water Heaters Now Inc 68.25 White Thomas W.06/07/2018 101-1220-4300 Maintenance Painting 520.00 White Thomas W.06/14/2018 101-1190-4300 Maintenance Painting-Library 930.00 White Thomas W. 1,450.00 Yardscapes, Inc 06/07/2018 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow - 6710 Pointe Lake Lucy 250.00 Yardscapes, Inc 250.00 501,257.77 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (06/15/2018 - 8:20 AM)Page 12 of 12 Accounts Payable Check Detail-ACH User: dwashburn Printed: 06/15/2018 - 8:20 AM Name Check Da Account Description Amount ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC 06/07/2018 101-1170-4300 Monthly service 125.00 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC 06/14/2018 101-1190-4300 Quarterly Service 250.00 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC 375.00 Al-Hilwani Juli 06/07/2018 101-1533-4300 Personal Training 431.25 Al-Hilwani Juli 431.25 AMERICAN SOLUTIONS 06/14/2018 700-0000-4340 #10 Window Envelopes 461.81 AMERICAN SOLUTIONS 06/14/2018 701-0000-4340 #10 Window Envelopes 461.80 AMERICAN SOLUTIONS 06/14/2018 700-0000-4340 #9 Utility Bill - Envelopes w/inside tint 435.27 AMERICAN SOLUTIONS 06/14/2018 701-0000-4340 #9 Utility Bill - Envelopes w/inside tint 435.28 AMERICAN SOLUTIONS 1,794.16 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 06/07/2018 101-1320-4120 Tested radio and found intermittent mode switch 253.00 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 253.00 BATTERIES PLUS 06/14/2018 101-1370-4530 3.6V NICD 287.84 BATTERIES PLUS 287.84 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 06/14/2018 101-1140-4302 Legal Services 17,233.78 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 17,233.78 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 06/07/2018 101-1220-4320 April 2018 122.33 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 06/07/2018 101-1350-4320 April 2018 3,194.29 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 06/07/2018 101-1540-4320 April 2018 359.19 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 06/07/2018 101-1550-4320 April 2018 382.39 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 06/07/2018 101-1600-4320 April 2018 29.33 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 06/07/2018 700-0000-4320 April 2018 112.25 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 06/07/2018 700-7019-4320 April 2018 1,786.45 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 06/07/2018 701-0000-4320 April 2018 1,303.56 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 7,289.79 Crystal Infosystems LLC 06/14/2018 101-1170-4110 HP 87X toner 245.95 Crystal Infosystems LLC 245.95 Engel Water Testing Inc 06/14/2018 700-0000-4300 26 water samples collected - May 2018 520.00 Engel Water Testing Inc 520.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (06/15/2018 - 8:20 AM)Page 1 of 6 Name Check Da Account Description Amount FASTENAL COMPANY 06/14/2018 700-0000-4550 misc parts/supplies 6.06 FASTENAL COMPANY 06/14/2018 700-0000-4550 misc parts/supplies 208.99 FASTENAL COMPANY 06/14/2018 700-0000-4150 misc parts/supplies 40.54 FASTENAL COMPANY 255.59 GENERAL PARTS LLC 06/07/2018 101-1170-4530 Adjusted thermostat on fridge 384.00 GENERAL PARTS LLC 384.00 GMH ASPHALT CORP 06/14/2018 601-6032-4751 Street Reconstruction Proj 16-01 Minnewashta Manor 113,061.08 GMH ASPHALT CORP 113,061.08 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 06/07/2018 400-0000-4300 FTP Tickets 1,568.70 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 1,568.70 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 06/14/2018 700-7019-4160 Chlorine Cylinder 130.00 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 06/14/2018 700-7019-4160 Chlorine Cylinder 80.00 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 210.00 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 06/14/2018 101-1420-4300 Chanhassen DT Vision Update - May 2018 2,895.00 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 2,895.00 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 06/07/2018 101-1170-4110 Pens, Stapler, Cups, Paper 246.83 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 06/07/2018 101-1170-4110 Envelopes, Clips, Labels 94.86 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 06/14/2018 101-1170-4110 Pens, Pencils, Clips, Tape, Highlighters 67.97 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 06/14/2018 101-1170-4110 Sharpie Markers 21.12 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 430.78 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 06/07/2018 101-1170-4530 Pipe Insulation 137.11 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 06/07/2018 101-1170-4530 Refrigerant 143.55 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 280.66 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 06/07/2018 101-1320-4120 Switch 162.72 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 06/07/2018 101-1320-4120 Switch 119.26 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 06/14/2018 701-0000-4260 Kit, Traction Nozzle 1" 735.29 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 1,017.27 Marco Inc 06/07/2018 101-1170-4410 Monthly maintenance charges - June 2018 675.65 Marco Inc 06/07/2018 700-0000-4410 Monthly maintenance charges - June 2018 100.00 Marco Inc 06/07/2018 701-0000-4410 Monthly maintenance charges - June 2018 100.00 Marco Inc 06/07/2018 720-0000-4410 Monthly maintenance charges - June 2018 50.00 Marco Inc 925.65 Master Electric Co. Inc.06/14/2018 701-0000-4300 Arc Flash Study - Galpin Lift Station 960.00 Master Electric Co. Inc. 960.00 Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc.06/14/2018 101-1370-4120 MS TIP CLEANER,PRO 33 NET 31# ALUM, PROPANE,OXYGEN 176.07 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (06/15/2018 - 8:20 AM)Page 2 of 6 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc. 176.07 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 06/14/2018 101-1320-4120 misc parts/supplies 9.32 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 06/14/2018 101-1320-4150 misc parts/supplies 4.78 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 06/14/2018 101-1540-4130 misc parts/supplies 74.93 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 06/14/2018 101-1550-4120 misc parts/supplies 537.88 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 06/14/2018 101-1550-4150 misc parts/supplies 1,508.48 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 06/14/2018 101-1550-4410 misc parts/supplies 117.53 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 06/14/2018 101-1310-4290 misc parts/supplies 14.02 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 06/14/2018 700-0000-4120 misc parts/supplies 30.29 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 06/14/2018 101-1160-4150 misc parts/supplies 5.38 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 06/14/2018 101-1220-4290 misc parts/supplies 116.91 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 06/14/2018 700-0000-4150 misc parts/supplies 68.55 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 06/14/2018 700-0000-4550 misc parts/supplies 13.49 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 06/14/2018 700-7043-4150 misc parts/supplies 125.43 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 2,626.99 Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 06/14/2018 101-1250-3816 SAC - May -2,211.65 Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 06/14/2018 701-0000-2023 SAC - May 221,165.00 Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 218,953.35 Minnesota Pump Works 06/07/2018 701-0000-4530 Lift Station 5 - Replaced Base Elbow/Guide Rail system 2,328.56 Minnesota Pump Works 06/07/2018 701-0000-4551 Lift Station 5 - Replaced existing 3"KSB Pump w/4" ABS pump 8,882.00 Minnesota Pump Works 06/14/2018 701-0000-4530 Misc parts - small old style spring assist 584.90 Minnesota Pump Works 11,795.46 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY06/14/2018 101-1250-3818 Surcharge - May 2018 -112.72 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY06/14/2018 101-0000-2022 Surcharge - May 2018 5,637.08 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 5,524.36 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 06/07/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 33.95 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 06/07/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 72.01 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 06/07/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 162.02 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 06/07/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 30.48 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 06/07/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 4,885.42 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 06/07/2018 101-1600-4320 electricity charges 33.23 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 06/07/2018 700-0000-4320 electricity charges 186.91 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 06/07/2018 701-0000-4320 electricity charges 634.16 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 06/14/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 4/30/18-5/31/18 158.43 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 6,196.61 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 06/07/2018 101-1320-4140 Oil Filters 13.56 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 06/14/2018 101-1550-4120 Adapter Bearing 214.69 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 06/14/2018 101-1320-4120 Oil and Fuel Filters 48.89 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 06/14/2018 101-1220-4120 Pipe Connecters, Reducer, Exhaust elbows -160.44 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 06/14/2018 101-1420-4140 Oil filter 3.04 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 119.74 PARROTT CONTRACTING INC 06/14/2018 700-0000-4552 6390 Pleasant View / re-route water svc to different curb stop 3,120.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (06/15/2018 - 8:20 AM)Page 3 of 6 Name Check Da Account Description Amount PARROTT CONTRACTING INC 06/14/2018 700-0000-4552 repair 2" water main @ pressure reducing station/ 6330 Hazeltine 3,782.31 PARROTT CONTRACTING INC 06/14/2018 700-0000-4552 6540 Grey Fox Curve water main repair 3,577.00 PARROTT CONTRACTING INC 10,479.31 Pine Products Inc 06/14/2018 101-1550-4150 Yards of WEstern Red Cedar Mulch 451.00 Pine Products Inc 06/14/2018 101-1550-4150 Yards of WEstern Red Cedar Mulch 451.00 Pine Products Inc 902.00 PLAYPOWER LT FARMINGTON INC06/14/2018 410-0000-4706 Playground Equipment - Manchester Park 45,000.00 PLAYPOWER LT FARMINGTON INC 45,000.00 Potentia MN Solar 06/07/2018 700-0000-4320 electricity charges 2,172.88 Potentia MN Solar 06/07/2018 101-1190-4320 electricity charges 4,087.83 Potentia MN Solar 06/07/2018 101-1170-4320 electricity charges 3,204.94 Potentia MN Solar 9,465.65 Premium Waters, Inc 06/14/2018 101-1550-4120 Chippewa 5 Gal Spring 68.40 Premium Waters, Inc 06/14/2018 101-1550-4120 Service Charge 3.99 Premium Waters, Inc 06/14/2018 101-1550-4120 Monthly rental - June 2018 10.30 Premium Waters, Inc 82.69 PRO TURF 06/14/2018 101-1550-4300 Early Spring Application 1,339.00 PRO TURF 06/14/2018 101-1550-4300 Early Spring Application 175.00 PRO TURF 06/14/2018 101-1550-4300 Early Spring Application 124.00 PRO TURF 06/14/2018 101-1550-4300 Early Spring Application 445.00 PRO TURF 2,083.00 Pro-Tec Design, Inc.06/07/2018 700-7047-4300 Labor-WWTP Security and Access Control Install partial payment 8,892.00 Pro-Tec Design, Inc. 8,892.00 RBM SERVICES INC 06/07/2018 101-1170-4350 Nightly Janitorial/Shampoo Public Safety Monthly - June 2018 2,262.62 RBM SERVICES INC 06/07/2018 101-1190-4350 Nightly Janitorial/Weekend Janitorial - June 2018 2,195.00 RBM SERVICES INC 4,457.62 RICE LAKE CONSTRUCTION GROUP06/14/2018 700-7047-4751 Chanhassen West WTP 525,000.00 RICE LAKE CONSTRUCTION GROUP06/14/2018 700-7050-4751 Chanhassen West WTP 250,386.20 RICE LAKE CONSTRUCTION GROUP 775,386.20 SPS COMPANIES INC 06/14/2018 101-1370-4260 Kremar Lastdrop Suction Gun #55027 46.00 SPS COMPANIES INC 46.00 STREICHER'S 06/07/2018 101-1260-4120 Combat Application Tourniquet - Tactical Black 89.97 STREICHER'S 89.97 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 06/14/2018 101-1250-4140 Misc parts/supplies 61.87 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 06/14/2018 422-0000-4704 Liner, Guard 229.80 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (06/15/2018 - 8:20 AM)Page 4 of 6 Name Check Da Account Description Amount SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 06/14/2018 400-4135-4704 Liner, Guard 229.80 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 521.47 SUMMIT COMPANIES 06/07/2018 101-1370-4300 Svc call for programming changes 330.00 SUMMIT COMPANIES 06/14/2018 101-1170-4300 MCFS-Monitoring June 2018 to May 2019 320.00 SUMMIT COMPANIES 06/14/2018 101-1220-4300 MCFS-Monitoring June 2018 to May 2019 500.00 SUMMIT COMPANIES 06/14/2018 101-1190-4300 MCFS-Monitoring June 2018 to May 2019 500.00 SUMMIT COMPANIES 06/14/2018 101-1370-4300 MCFS-Monitoring June 2018 to May 2019 500.00 SUMMIT COMPANIES 06/14/2018 101-1550-4300 MCFS-Monitoring June 2018 to May 2019 240.00 SUMMIT COMPANIES 2,390.00 TWIN CITY SEED CO.06/14/2018 101-1550-4150 50# Bale - Enviroblend Hydromulch Slick Shot 208.60 TWIN CITY SEED CO.06/14/2018 101-1550-4150 Seed Mixture, Oats, All Wood Hydormulch 434.60 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 643.20 United Farmers Cooperative 06/14/2018 101-1550-4120 Plug, Annular Buffer 9.90 United Farmers Cooperative 06/14/2018 101-1550-4120 Fuel Pump, Flangette 48.42 United Farmers Cooperative 58.32 UNITED WAY 06/07/2018 101-0000-2006 PR Batch 00408.06.2018 United Way 28.40 UNITED WAY 28.40 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/07/2018 101-1550-4310 phone charges 4/19/18-5/18/18 449.21 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/07/2018 101-1520-4310 phone charges 4/19/18-5/18/18 51.50 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/07/2018 101-1600-4310 phone charges 4/19/18-5/18/18 27.86 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/07/2018 101-1530-4310 phone charges 4/19/18-5/18/18 51.50 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/07/2018 101-0000-2006 phone charges 4/19/18-5/18/18 10.00 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/07/2018 700-0000-4310 phone charges 4/19/18-5/18/18 844.35 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/07/2018 701-0000-4310 phone charges 4/19/18-5/18/18 710.58 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/07/2018 720-0000-4310 phone charges 4/19/18-5/18/18 118.32 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/07/2018 101-1160-4310 phone charges 4/19/18-5/18/18 113.00 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/07/2018 101-1120-4310 phone charges 4/19/18-5/18/18 375.87 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/07/2018 101-1170-4310 phone charges 4/19/18-5/18/18 31.81 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/07/2018 101-1260-4310 phone charges 4/19/18-5/18/18 103.63 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/07/2018 101-1130-4310 phone charges 4/19/18-5/18/18 51.50 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/07/2018 101-1250-4310 phone charges 4/19/18-5/18/18 144.81 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/07/2018 101-1310-4310 phone charges 4/19/18-5/18/18 301.83 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/07/2018 101-1370-4310 phone charges 4/19/18-5/18/18 120.12 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/07/2018 101-1320-4310 phone charges 4/19/18-5/18/18 356.12 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/07/2018 101-1220-4310 phone charges 4/19/18-5/18/18 488.11 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/07/2018 101-1220-4310 phone charges 4/19/18-5/18/18 40.01 VERIZON WIRELESS 4,390.13 WATSON COMPANY 06/07/2018 101-1540-4130 Lake Ann concessions supplies 219.26 WATSON COMPANY 06/14/2018 101-1540-4130 Lake Ann Concession supplies 326.22 WATSON COMPANY 545.48 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 06/14/2018 420-0000-4751 Asphalt Plant 552.99 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 06/14/2018 420-0000-4751 Asphalt Plant 723.69 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (06/15/2018 - 8:20 AM)Page 5 of 6 Name Check Da Account Description Amount WM MUELLER & SONS INC 06/14/2018 420-0000-4751 Asphalt Plant 313.63 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 06/14/2018 420-0000-4751 Asphalt Plant 632.79 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 06/14/2018 420-0000-4751 Asphalt Tack 665.00 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 06/14/2018 420-0000-4751 Asphalt Plant 315.21 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 06/14/2018 420-0000-4751 Asphalt Plant 318.37 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 3,521.68 WW GRAINGER INC 06/07/2018 101-1170-4510 Wheel Swivel Caster, Rigid Plate Caster 25.64 WW GRAINGER INC 06/07/2018 101-1170-4510 Ring Stem Mount, Wheel Swivel Caster, Brace 33.63 WW GRAINGER INC 06/14/2018 101-1550-4120 Vibration Isolator 18.64 WW GRAINGER INC 77.91 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC 06/14/2018 101-1320-4120 E Eagle All Pro Strip, Dirt shoe w/carbide 1,398.00 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC 1,398.00 ZIEGLER INC 06/14/2018 700-0000-4120 Belt set, Hoses 370.33 ZIEGLER INC 370.33 1,266,641.44 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (06/15/2018 - 8:20 AM)Page 6 of 6