The URL can be used to link to this page

11. WAP Appendix DAvienda Wetland Permit Application APPENDIX D Wetland Delineation Addendum r NSA KJOHIA UG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY liftwormitu__ Providing Sound,Balanced,Comprehensive Natural Resource Solutions Memorandum Date: January 9, 2017 To: Terry Jeffery, City of Chanhassen Ryan Malterud, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Cc: Darren Lazan, Landform Professional Services, LLC From: Melissa Barrett, Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company Re: Delineation Addendum AVIENDA, CHANHASSEN, MN (formerly The District at Vincent Ridge) This memo provides an addendum to the 2015 City approved wetland delineation for the Avienda site in Chanhassen, MN (Figure 1). Background Information Eight wetlands were originally identified and delineated on the Avienda site as illustrated on Figure 2. These wetlands (Wetlands 1 through 8) were reviewed and approved in November 2015 by the Local Governmental Unit(LGU) (City of Chanhassen) (Appendix C) when the site was under contract by a different developer and was known as "The District at Vincent Ridge". Previous delineation reports/memos describe the 2015 approved delineation in more detail and included National Wetland Inventory (NWI) and soil survey mapping. Copies of those reports/memos are available upon request. In 2016,the new developer for the site contracted with Kjolhaug Environmental Services (KES) for wetland permitting services. As part of the wetland permit application, MnRAM analyses based on wetland characteristics is required to determine wetland buffer widths. As such, KES visited the site on September 28, 2016 to document wetlands and their adjacent upland characteristics for completing the MnRAM analyses. During that visit, two additional wetlands were identified and delineated. Wetland 9 Wetland 9 was a 0.10-acre, Type 1 (PEMAfd)partially-drained, farmed, seasonally flooded basin that was drained by an incised and back cutting gully. 26105 Wild Rose Lane, Shorewood, Minnesota 55331, Phone: 952-401-8757, Fax:952-401-8798 Wetland 9 was historically an approximately 0.69-acre Type 2 wetland. On April 6, 2007 the City of Chanhassen approved a WCA agricultural exemption allowing the landowner(Fox Properties, LP) to impact Wetland 9 (Attachment A). The WCA exemption expires after 10 years (i.e., expiration date of April 6, 2017). Any impact within the area of historic Wetland 9 prior to the expiration date would require replacement. After April 6, 2017, any required replacement would be based on wetland that currently exits. Therefore, wetland that currently exists in or near the area of historic Wetland 9 was delineated during the September 2016 site visit(Figure 2). A data sheet documenting the 2016 boundary for Wetland 9 is included in Attachment B. A review of all available FSA photos (198o's to present)was not completed for the area of Wetland 9 since they are not all representative of post-exemption site conditions. Instead, available FSA photos from post-2007 (2008, 2009, 2010, 2013, and 2015) were reviewed for wetland signatures in and around the area of Wetland 9. The delineated boundary of Wetland 9 corresponds to saturated soil signatures observed in 2013 and 2015 (Attachment C). Wetland Signature Observations for 2016 Delineated Wetland 9 Year Climatic Condition Wetland Signature 2008 Normal None 2009 Dry None 2010 Normal None 2013 Wet Saturated Soil 2015 Normal Saturated Soil Wetland 10 Wetland 10 was a 0.07-acre, Type 1 (PFO1A)primarily unvegetated, seasonally flooded basin located in the southwest woodland. During the September 2016 site visit, KES observed surface runoff flowing into the northwest edge of Wetland 4 from upslope. After following a shallow and mostly dry drainageway/swale to the top of the woodland, Wetland 10 was discovered Figure 2). Based on wetland type, Wetland 10 would have water only during the springtime in normal years and could easily be missed. It is likely that the hydrology observed during the site visit was a function of the wetter than normal fall precipitation conditions of the 2016 growing season Attachment C). A data sheet documenting the 2016 boundary for Wetland 10 is included in Attachment B. Wetlands 1 Through 8 Wetlands 1 through 8 were observed to be as originally delineated (Figure 2) during the September 28, 2016 site visit. With submission of this delineation addendum we request that the wetland boundary and type for Wetlands 9 and 10 be approved by the LGU. We are requesting delineation concurrence and a PJD from the USAGE. Attachment A of the Joint Application Form is included within Appendix A of the Avienda Wetland Permit Application. Page 2 of 2 Lnannassen e., fi. r Ffi• I gtY i i fM F Chanhassen' V k.` wqn sinro, n sMw 4, a,c I r t A 7T ' file c Pator111111Vi a , . ..i i N::•. 1 I 1 iF' o` n® J Ak Y basin Y u 4r q rw 1 31i w ,.. a. 4.4.4....• 1,„r.` OpenStreetMap(and)contributors,CC-BY-SA Figure 1 - Site Location N 0 1,500 Avienda Delineation Addendum (KES 2015-130) 4, , Chanhassen, Minnesota11 =1Feet f<._ Note:Boundaries indicated on this figure are approximate KJO T• nom UG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY and do not constitute an 11.'-......-..-^-m, official survey product.0%,.....r Source:MnGeo,ESRI Imagery Basemap T 952 896 g04903 932`938 954 P. Z. 946 950 942 940 890 892 - -902710894 9.4-4,...-..a...- 9,g394{I— — 9 - 836 — Lo N 934 954 950 946 944 .. E WL6 9 Buildings shown 9Sa ss 0:7816-ac m ° here no D 95-2 948 o, 398 896 longer present 950 T C , 952rn O rn r - " 918 914 916 n N 1 926gi I r ,.:::.:1 9c) c' 1. 0. amiO1 ' 0 w godI c, e r- g36 WL2 gat 9442.2569-ac WL81. m Historic 41,0.0844-ac y y . I' W L'9 9`' 0 9 974 94111 p }-• O a 8 7 4o SP9 ` WL1/2 0 co 0 0.1860-ac WL1 932 1.001-ac 930 2016,WL9 90• WL7l070985-ac r • 0.0150-ac 924 92.1 1'91 c WL3 7—_ -------7-77—.----. C--) i aV,ik, it* 0.6696 ac 926 398 i WL5 y . _, 0.3483-ac 97s ice A 9 0 .. ;. J44 WL4 O o 9 16 t/xi,t i 4/4070.1253-ac° N B 9i f/ 890 896 r D 888 894 or 882 fit . 4: 876 87 87' 4 t! SP10, t ' 1 .,,;. Legend vt , WL10,g v 9 i:\,\\,,,t 0.0740-ac Q Proposed Site MnDOT Wetland S ` t Historic Wetland 9 ---+ Waterway k 0 i ;: r I Transect t Intermittent Drainageway F f •. • t t i 1111i` a'' 1 Wetlands Ag Tile v • w,,, •,,,-......-'#'-h,-lj) • Carver County Lidar vim _ : • -- j ' rl T' tt` `.4*AWRM/ Figure 2 - Existing Conditions (2016 7-County Photo) N 0 300 Avienda Mixed Use Regional/Lifestyle Center (KES 2015-130) Chanhassen, MinnesotaA6m::=1 Feet Note:Boundaries indicated aki {• 4-on this figure are approximate KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY and do not constitute an official survey product. Source:MnGeo,ESRI Imagery Basemap Avienda Delineation Addendum ATTACHMENT A WCA Notice of Decision 11111 April 6, 2007 MYOF Fox Properties,LP CiliNgiSSEN 27990 Smithtown Road Excelsior,MN 553331 7700 Market Boulevard PO Boz 147 Re: Wetland Exemption Application Chanhassen,MN 55317 Administration Dear Fox Properties,LP: Phone:952.227.1100 Fa952.227.1110 Enclosed please find the City's decision, as LGU for the Minnesota Wetland ksalMing inspections Conservation Act,regarding your recent wetland exemption application. Phone:952,227,1160 Fax 952227.1190 Please bear in mind that the proposed activity must comply with provisions of Engineering the Chanhassen City Code and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act,as Phone:952.227.1160 well as the regulations of any other applicable jurisdictions. Specifically: Fac 952,227.1170 Finance 1. A permit from the City of Chanhassen must be obtained for all Phone:952.227.1140 excavating,mining,filling,and grading operations in excess of 50 Fax 952.227.1110 cubic yards. Permits for excavating,mining,filling,and grading more Park&Recreation than 50 cubic yards,but less than 1,000 cubic yards of material in a Mono 952.227.1120 12-month period are processed administratively. Permits for Fax 952.227.1110 excavating,mining,filling,and grading of 1,000 cubic yards of Recreation Center material or more in a 12-month period are.processed it the same MO Coulter Boulevard manner as an interim use permit and require approval by the Phone:952227.1400 Fax 952227.1404 Chanhassen Planning Commission and City Council. Planning 8 2. This exemption is subject to the 10 year deed recording requirement in . Phoone;952.227.1130 nal Resources Pone:MR 8420.0115. A document meetingthe minimum requirements of ~.:. Fax 952,227.1110 MR 8420.0115 (enclosed)must be provided to the City.for its review' '; and approval prior to recording. The document must'be recorded with '_ Works 1591 P Road Carver County prior to commencing the exempt activity.1 1 P Phage:952227.1300 Additionally,a copy of the recorded document should be submitted to Fax 952.227,1310 the City at least two business days prior to commencing the exempt Senior Center activity. ' Phone;952227.1125 Fax 952227.1110 3. This activity may or may not be considered exempt by the U.S.Army Web sne Corps of Engineers. The applicant should acquire all necessary eww,ci.chanhassen.mn.us approvals from the Army Corps of Engineers prior to commencing the proposed activity. 4. The activity must comply with Section.20.416 of Chanhassen City Code regarding wetland exemptions(enclosed). The City of Chanhassen•A growing community with clean lakes,quality schools,a charming downtown,thriving businesses,winding trails,and beautiful parks.A great place to live,work,and play. 5. The activity should not modify existing hydrology on adjacent properties. If you have any questions or need additional information,please contact me at 952)227-1135 or lhaak@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Sincerely, CITY OF CHANHASSEN Lori Haak Water Resources Coordinator Enclosures cc: Ben Meyer,Bonestroo Greg Graczyk,Carver SWCD Brad Wozney,BWSR g.`mgitorilweUandskzemptionslfox Ip cover letter.doc Minnesota 'Piet-land Conservation Act Notice o, VJetlanci Ccnseivatlen Ac'L Decision Name and Address of Local Government Unit: City of Chanhassen—7700 Market Boulevard P.O.Box 147-Chanhassen,MN 55317 Name of Applicant:Fox Properties,LP Project Name:Fox LP Wetland Exemption Application Number:tl/a Type of Application(check one): ®Exemption Decision No Loss Decision O Replacement Plan Decision Banking Plan Decision Wetland Type/Boundary Decision Date of Decision: April 6,2007 Check One: ®Approved Approved with conditions fl Denied Summary of Project/Decision(indicate exemption number per MN Rule 8420.0122,if applicable):112 The applicant requested exemptions for a wetland on the property in the SW to of the SW'A of Section 23, Township 116N,Range 23W in Carver County,Minnesota. Based on the findings of the Technical Evaluation Panel(Attachment 1),dated April 6,2007,the City of Chanhassen Approves the exemption request. List of Addressees: Landowner: Fox Properties,LP,27990 Smithtown Road,Excelsior,MN 55331 Members of Technical Evaluation Panel: Greg Graczyk,Carver SWCD Brad Wozney,BWSR Watershed District or Watershed Management Organization (If Applicable): Bob Obermeyer,RPBCWD Department of Natural Resources Regional Office(select appropriate office): NW Region: NE Region: Central Region: Southern Region: Regional Director Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol_ Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol.Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. 2115 Birchnjont Beach Rd.NE Div.Ecol.Services Div.Ecol.Services Div.Ecol.Services Bemidji,MN 56601 1201 E Hwy.2 1200 Warner.Road 261 Hwy.15 South Grand Rapids,MN 55744 St.Paul,MN 55106 New Ulm,MN 56073 Page 1 of 2 DNR Representative t Kate Drewry,Area Hydrologist Corp of Engineers Project Manager Joe Yanta,ACOE Department of the Army,Corps of Engineers,St.Paul District ATTN:CO-11, 190 Fifth Street East St.Paul,MN 55101-1638 Individual members of the public who requested a copy,summary only Ben Meyer,Bonestroo Rick Dorsey You are hereby notified that the decision of the Local Government Unit on the above- referenced application was made on the date stated above. A copy of the Local Government Unit's Findings and Conclusions is attached. Pursuant to Minn.R.8420.0250 any appeal of the decision must be commenced by mailing a petition for appeal to the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources within thirty(30)calendar days of the date of the mailing of this Notice. THIS DECISION ONLY APPLIES TO the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Additional approvals or permits from local,state, and federal agencies may be required Check with all appropriate authorities before commencing work in or near wetlands. LOCAL GOVERN?v I UNIT 40:0 Ar April 6, 2007 Signature Date Lori Haak,Water Resources Coordinator Name and Title Attachments: 1. Technical Evaluation Panel Findings of Fact,dated April 6,2007 Page 2 of 2 lV11;'+_IF?j0t% 1 vVefland Act iir•:=,j`.; i.tiotice Ac: i._I „'._'•(1 Name and address of local government unit:City of Chanhassen-7700 Market Boulevard-P.O. Box 147-Chanhassen,MN 55317 The undersigned certifies on April 6.2007 Lori Haak he/she mailed copies of the attached Notice of Wetland Conservation Act Decision to the addressees listed thereon by depositing the same in the United States Mail in the City of Chanhassen County of Carver and State of Minnesota,properly enveloped with prepaid first class postage. vv April 6,2007 tgn:ture Date Water Resources Coordinator Title Page loft Fox LP Cert Mail Notice Decision.doc April 2003) Minnesota Wetland Conservation /act i Technical Evaluation Panel Findirng:3 of Fact late:April 6.3007 LGU:City()1Chnnhasierl County,Ctttver LOU Contact:1.oti I•i;la1;.Watel Resources C:ooulinahir Project Namellt:Fox LP Wetland Full:Minn Phone it:952,227.1 135 I mation of Project: yVl' gW , r3 I I6N 23W b5 t, ty tier: Twp Range Lot/Block City:(chnnhasscp jimmy:(':reef f 15P Members land others;oho rut lentil;projeee tt hick If'.;caul pn.hcl 4k t_GU:Lori Hind; t3WSR:l3(iId Worucv 0 SWCD:Grei_(3rie4yk DNR til appllcnl+h): Other Wetland Experts present:None, TEP requested by: LOU 1 Type of TEP determination requested DANA.thus.rhlr.ppl,): x Exemption(WCA Exemption it ID) Nu-Loss Wetland Boundary and Typo Replacement Plan Description ill Weiland(s)with proposed impact: (see alias hLd) a Weiland Type(Circular 39)_Type 2 (Cnwardin) h Weiland Site f0 acres on subject_prtnwrly(1.3.1 acres Mall c.Size ol'Proposed Impact(acres and stature first)0.69 acre;;(30.056 in 3 Have sequencing re uirrmtents horn met? Attach Sequencing Finding of Fact as suppntting information. YesIIMI No(if no,list why)n/n 4 Is the project consistent milli the Mien(of the compueliemiv local a uttn plan and/or the watrrsltod distriei plan,the ineiroptlitan surface wilier mmnagentenl plan and metropoliInit pound water management plan.and local comprehensive plan and zoning ordinancc•i' :Nes 0 No 1ifnn.list min I n/n 5 Hon will the project allctt the ihllnwing wetland functions: n/u hp:lions jl11pll4I, Nu Impact. Intl on nominate' Storage Ntuiient Assimilation Sediment I nUnpmeni Gtuundwnier Ruchargu Low Flow Augmentnthrn Aettthetica/Recreution Shoreland Anchoring Wildlife I•Inbitnt Fisheries Habitat Rare Plant/Animal Habitat Commercial Uses 6 For replacement plan nr rue-ins determinations.are wetland functions maintained at an equal or greater level? 0 Yen 0 No(if no.list why) do 7 Does Technical Evaluation Panel recommend mrroval of the activity proposed In item I t Yes 0 Yes.with Conditions No(if no.Iiia why) If no.why? 13 Lull TEP findings In support recommendntiwr in question 7 above (six:ntutched) 9 SIGNATURES((r'ThP r errnli7UGNirm if rrUl a ctv,senntr wit itll an arm;i I .,gtluln un the/ rk a liar page') Nwi 1)I;a-nl;nice /`Wok) IIWKII Itcprrl4cl f e r () f r:l IKirnxrnla it. Doer r)NR Repnyr.'nili r Dal Parr I of I Pia LP(Miming,t'llaiing,n(Km and April 2003) 4 i- Fox LP Wetland Exemption TEP Findings of Fact April 6,2007 Attachment 8. List TEP findings to support recommendation in question 7 above. TEP members from the LGU and the Carver SWCD conducted an on-site review on March 22,2007. The wetland is a Type 2 wetland that is less than two(2) acres in size and located on agricultural land. All exempt wetlands will be subject to the 10 year deed recording requirements set forth in MR 8420.0115. Avienda Delineation Addendum ATTACHMENT B Wetland Determination Data Forms 1/9/2017 Precipitation Documentation Worksheet Using Gridded Database Minnesota Climatology Working Group State Climatology Office - DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources University of Minnesota home I current conditions ( journal I past data I summaries I agriculture I other sites I contact us I search gi Precipitation Worksheet Using Gridded Database Precipitation data for target wetland location: county: Carver township number: 116N township name: Lake Minnewashta range number: 23W nearest community: Chanhassen section number: 23 Aerial photograph or site visit date: Thursday, September 01, 2016 Score using 1981-2010 normal period first prior values are in inches month: second prior third prior A'R' following a monthly total indicates a provisional value derived from August month: month: radar-based estimates. 2016 July 2016 June 2016 estimated precipitation total for this location: 10.01 5.49 3.80 there is a 30% chance this location will have less than: 3.11 2.94 3.27 there is a 30% chance this location will have more than:5.25 4.23 5.27 type of month: dry normal wet wet wet normal monthly score 3 * 3 = 9 2 * 3 = 6 1 * 2 = 2 multi-month score: 17 (Wet) 6 to 9(dry) 10 to 14 (normal) 15 to 18(wet) Other Resources: retrieve daily precipitation data view radar-based precipitation estimates view weekly precipitation maps Evaluating Antecedent Precipitation Conditions (BWSR) http://climate.um n.edu/gridded_data/preci p/wetland/worksheet.asp?passXutm 83=456391&passYutm 83=4965441&passcounty=Carver&passcounty_num ber=10... 1/1 1/9/2017 Precipitation Documentation Worksheet Using Gridded Database Minnesota Climatology Working Group State Climatology Office - DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources University of Minnesota home I current conditions I journal I past data I summaries I agriculture I other sites I contact us I search Precipitation Worksheet Using Gridded Database Precipitation data for target wetland location: county: Carver township number: 116N township name: Lake Minnewashta range number: 23W nearest community: Chanhassen section number: 23 Aerial photograph or site visit date: Saturday, October 01, 2016 Score using 1981-2010 normal period values are in inches first prior second prior third prior month: month: A 'R' following a monthly total indicates a provisional value derived from September August month: radar-based estimates. 2016 2016 July 2016 estimated precipitation total for this location: 5.60 10.01 5.49 there is a 30% chance this location will have less than: 2.48 3.11 2.94 there is a 30% chance this location will have more than: 4.35 5.25 4.23 type of month: dry normal wet wet wet wet monthly score 3 * 3 = 9 2 * 3 = 6 1 * 3 = 3 multi-month score: 18 (Wet) 6 to 9 (dry) 10 to 14 (normal) 15 to 18 (wet) Other Resources: retrieve daily precipitation data view radar-based precipitation estimates view weekly precipitation maps Evaluating Antecedent Precipitation Conditions (BWSR) http://clim ate.umn.edu/gri dded_data/preci p/wetl and/worksheet.asp?passXutm 83=456391&passYutm 83=4965441&passcounty=Carver&passcounty_num ber=10... 1/1 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site Avienda City/County: Chanhassen/Carver Sampling Date:9/28/2016 Applicant/Owner: Level 7 State: MN Sampling Point:SP9-wet Investigator(s): M.Barrett Section,Township,Range: Sec23,T166, R23 Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.):swale Local relief(concave,convex,none): flat to slight concave Slope(%): 0-3 Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Nam€Lester-Kilkenny JWI Classification: PEM1Af Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation X ,soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation soil or hydrology naturally problematic?present? No SUMMARY OF FINDINGS If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y f yes,optional wetland site ID:Wetland 9 Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Gridded database climatic condition not typical(wet). Farmed=not normal circumstances. Vegetation=disturbed. VEGETATION-- Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size:30 ) %Cover Species Status Number of Dominant Species 1 that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 0 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 1 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 0.00% (A/B) 0 =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratur (Plot size:15 ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total%Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 0 x 2= 0 4 FAC species 0 x 3= 0 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 0 =Total Cover UPL species 25 x 5= 125 Herb stratum Plot size:5 Column totals 25 (A) 125 (B) 1 Glycine Max 25 Y UPL Prevalence Index=B/A= 5.00 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Dominance test is>50% 6 Prevalence index is 53.0* 7 8 Morphological adaptations*(provide supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 25 =Total Cover explain) Woody vine stratum (Plot size:30 ) indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be1present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Stunted soybeans, low overall percent cover. US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP9-wet Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type* Loc** Texture Remarks Type:C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M= Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histosol(Al)Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L, R) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface (S7)(LRR K, L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) Iron Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) X Other(explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al 1)Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? Y Depth (inches): Remarks: Hydric soil assumed present. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) Surface Water(Al) Aquatic Fauna(B13) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(B14) Drainage Patterns(B10) Saturation(A3)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3)Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) X Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) C6) FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) -Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water table present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes No X Depth(inches): hydrology present? Y includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge,monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Surface soil was saturated from recent rain, pockets of standing water present on surface. D2 may not apply due to drainage by gully. US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site Avienda City/County: Chanhassen/Carver Sampling Date:9/28/2016 Applicant/Owner: Level 7 State: MN Sampling Point: SP9-upl Investigator(s): M. Barrett Section,Township,Range: Sec23,T166, R23 Landform (hillslope,terrace,etc.): flat farm field Local relief(concave,convex,none): flat/linear Slope(%): 0-3 Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit NamE Lester-Kilkenny VW'Classification: PEM1Af Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation X , soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation soil or hydrology naturally problematic?present? No SUMMARY OF FINDINGS If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? N Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N f yes,optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Gridded database climatic condition not typical(wet). Farmed=not normal circumstances.Vegetation=disturbed. VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size:30 ) %Cover Species Status Number of Dominant Species 1 that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 0 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 1 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 0.00% (A/B) 0 =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratur (Plot size:15 ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total%Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 0 x 2= 0 4 FAC species 0 x 3= 0 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 0 =Total Cover UPL species 50 x 5= 250 Herb stratum Plot size:5 Column totals 50 (A) 250 (B) 1 Glycine Max 50 Y UPL Prevalence Index= B/A= 5.00 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Dominance test is>50% 6 Prevalence index is 553.0* 7 Morphological adaptations*(provide8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 50 =Total Cover explain) Woody vine stratum (Plot size:30 ) Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be1present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? N Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Healthy soybeans, normal overall percent cover. US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP9-upl Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type* Loc** Texture Remarks Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL= Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histosol(Al) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L, R) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K, L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) X Other(explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al1) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? Y Depth(inches): Remarks: Hydric soil assumed present. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) Surface Water(Al) Aquatic Fauna(B13) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(B14) Drainage Patterns(B10) Saturation(A3)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) C6) FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) -Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes No X Depth (inches): hydrology present? N includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Surface soil was wet from recent rain, no pockets of standing water present on surface. US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Midwest Region Project/Site Avienda City/County: Chanhassen/Carver Sampling Date:9/28/2016 Applicant/Owner: Level 7 State: MN Sampling Point:SP10-wet Investigator(s): M.Barrett Section,Township,Range: Sec23,T166, R23 Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): slight depression Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): 0-3 Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Nam€Kilkenny-Lester JWI Classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation soil or hydrology naturally problematic?present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y f yes,optional wetland site ID: Wetland 10 Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Gridded database climatic condition not typical(wet). VEGETATION --Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size:30 ) %Cover Species Status Number of Dominant Species 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 25 Y FACW that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 1 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 1 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 25 =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratur (Plot size:15 ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total%Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 25 x 2= 50 4 FAC species 0 x 3= 0 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum Plot size:5 Column totals 25 (A)50 (B) 1 Prevalence Index=B/A= 2.00 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is>50% 6 X Prevalence index is 53.0* 7 Morphological adaptations*(provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 0 =Total Cover explain) Woody vine stratum (Plot size:30 ) Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Some sedge present in wetland. Green ash not in wetland, but overhanging edges. US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP10-wet Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type* Loc** Texture Remarks Type:C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL= Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histosol (Al)Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L,R) Histic Epipedon(A2)Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) X Other(explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck(Al0) Depleted Matrix(F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al 1) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mucky Mineral (51) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? Y Depth(inches): Remarks: Hydric soil assumed present. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) X Surface Water(Al) Aquatic Fauna(B13) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) X High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(B14) Drainage Patterns(B10) X Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) C6) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7)Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes X No Depth(inches):2 Water table present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 2+Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth(inches):0 hydrology present? Y includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge,monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Water table= apparent water table. US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Midwest Region Project/Site Avienda City/County: Chanhassen/Carver Sampling Date:9/28/2016 Applicant/Owner: Level 7 State: MN Sampling Point:SP10-upl Investigator(s): M. Barrett Section,Township,Range: Sec23,T166, R23 Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): flat woodland Local relief(concave,convex,none): flat/linear Slope(%): 0-3 Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Namt Kilkenny-Lester MI Classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation soil or hydrology naturally problematic?present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? N Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N f yes,optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Gridded database climatic condition not typical(wet). VEGETATION-- Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size:30 ) %Cover Species Status Number of Dominant Species 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 25 Y FACW that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 1 (A) 2 Quercus rubra 15 Y FACU Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 2 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 50.00% (NB) 40 =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratur (Plot size:15 ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total%Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 25 x 2= 50 4 FAC species 0 x 3= 0 5 FACU species 15 x 4= 60 0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum Plot size:5 Column totals 40 A) 110 (B) 1 Prevalence Index=B/A= 2.75 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Dominance test is>50% 6 X Prevalence index is 53.0* 7 Morphological adaptations*(provide8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 0 =Total Cover explain) Woody vine stratum (Plot size:30 ) Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be1present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? N Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP10-upl Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type* Loc"" Texture Remarks Type:C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. ""Location: PL= Pore Lining, M= Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histosol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L, R) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K, L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) X Other(explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type:Hydric soil present? Y Depth (inches): Remarks: Hydric soil assumed present. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) Surface Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(B13) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(614) Drainage Patterns(810) Saturation(A3)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(61) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(65) C6) FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) -Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes No X Depth (inches): hydrology present? N includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Avienda Delineation Addendum ATTACHMENT C FSA Photos ipir S j_ h 4. 41t* skip' 41 V.P I WL6 L, 111 • 1 ,11 ' i• ce ,# jir A 111V ' = 4 IF: i t f 4 t ME WL1/2 4 MD slik.M0 4 2 f r Cmom.m................, 2008 FSA Photo (Normal Climatic Year) with Delineated Wetland 9 N 0 150 Avienda Delineation Addendum (KES 2015-130) s; i Feet Chanhassen, Minnesota 1- - Note:Boundaries indicated on this figure are approximate KJOLnAI/G ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY and do not constitute an official survey product. 1r Source:MnGeo,ESRI Imagery Basemap x 7';- I**WL6 a 4,, i q Sti__ ttI 4 Milg 111m WL1/2 iiib WM MO 2 C." 2009 FSA Photo (Dry Climatic Year) with Delineated Wetland 9 N 0 150 Avienda Delineation Addendum (KES 2015-130) 4„-. Feet Chanhassen, Minnesota 1- - Note:Boundaries indicated Aa- <- on this figure are approximate KJOt'nnUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY and do not constitute an mow official survey product. r Source:MnGeo,ESRI Imagery Basemap i 01aya. k 1. i{.' i* A i it*I0I. , t a MEI 4 '* ati 1 row s 441‘411,„0, 1 , r MS WL1/2 064 . .' 4 2111e4P_7, .. 1 i . 1., . . ‘''''L* 44ir '11. • • -4 411 Mb- II 2010 FSA Photo (Normal Climatic Year) with Delineated Wetland 9 N 0 150 Avienda Delineation Addendum (KES 2015-130) It; Chanhassen, Minnesota 4Feet Note:Boundaries indicated Aa T i ~ 4,...on this figure are approximate KJOLHA UG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY and do not constitute an official survey product. 1.../Source:MnGeo,ESRI Imagery Basemap i y a• MD d w le R i 4 416,..0, w WL2 t AllID Wil1/2 WL9 1a, iek. WL3 likito ic • L. ii9 lop,LIlk 2013 FSA Photo (Wet Climatic Year) with Delineated Wetland 9 N 0 150 Avienda Delineation Addendum (KES 2015-130) s; Chanhassen, Minnesota ie. Immii=1Feet Note:Boundaries indicated j T r on this figure are approximate KjoLHA T rG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY and do not constitute an v....9-•,—,-• official survey product. sai1v Source:MnGeo,ESRI Imagery Basemap WL6 lows& 111WL1/2 Ve 00 WL3) f ,.. T •u MEI 11111111110 2015 FSA Photo (Normal Climatic Year) with Delineated Wetland 9 N 0 150 Avienda Delineation Addendum (KES 2015-130) Chanhassen, Minnesota 6====1 Feet Note:Boundaries indicated on this figure are approximate KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY and do not constitute an official survey product. Source:MnGeo,ESRI Imagery Basemap