Loading...
13. WAP Appendix FAvienda Wetland Permit Application APPENDIX F MnRAM Analysis Output Results c < < # < < $ A. / a CI a CT / a a a DFri if if II \ 7 I I- r- q §. G 2 0 2 _ A 2 ft 2 r co2 lz9) 9) § a) § $ 9) % S o S S S 2 co" k 2 u - -0 -0 - -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 - p 2 K E K K 2 2 K 0 m m m m I k co o 2 0. > _ ' > k > > > § 0 ` 2 0- CD ® < 2 V2 2 '< 0D ® 2 ® '< < V 0 0 / / / / D I A p 2 41 a3 ƒ 0$ § ƒ ƒ $ a 2 k 24.f% e s £ = & ( k § CO _ _ Fii_ • ƒ ƒ_ .: /_ q Q 4'k \ ; » k k k k CD m t CD 0 CD m m CD 2 { an) { { 2 2 E Co 5 7 2 k q b 2 et 0 0 0 0 ® 0 0 © © 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o• k 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 § § ok g g P , g g o 0 0 0 2 g - g -. « m a a a 6 4 ƒ q1 K M c c a o r I- r Et Zi. a a K ! ! a , E E E 2 C 2 2 I- 2E5 a \ c‘ mo E o 7 3 0 E 2 2 * 2 * / §C g 7 \ u r--1 rn II I-1 I—I 1-1 1 t k 7 0 ZZ m 0 b ft r r / 0 Cr% et et 2 7 ft o. % o. oe o.k § 2 S o ) A e m \ h. m 2 2 2 4 acoaco p O u o 4. 2, % m m §27 - o \ 5 5 2 It:C4 b 3 b o \ 0 \ \ A t' 7 n 4 10 A % cp t_.,'• . 2A. k I / \ q a $$i gtet I- rQ $ /2 §' Q k 0.\ z J I- r / a / / k k NIK u E i—i ll lI .. 17 2 > > > > > >> Z.m' m m m m m5. CD m' m CD fpaaaaao. a a a a immmmmmmdmm co 01 ,Ii O V O) A Ca C n O o m i A cb kVCZt W W Ca C W C W C.) CO C.) ti COD a CODCDCOCDCOCOCDf0COCOCO 9 9 0 9 O O 9 9 9 9 na .. A N 0) O) O) 0) Q) 0) 0)0)O N N N W WOW WWADWW F N N N N CO CaN CaN W W W W W W w W wo0bOoaOoO o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m O m 0 m 0 00 m 0 O m O m 0 O O m 0 '.Z'7 m 7 m 7 m m m 7 m m 7 m 7 m m m 7 m a7, (D v m V v V (D v V m y gm mm gm 3.3 B.mj-m 3 3 j(m(i 3 3.6' y g.3 3 37 3N C fO y Ny , OFD' N N N 4N1 fO N N N V(/1 N O ft....,O 4 O 4'O O O 4.O 5 4'O '^O O O 4'O o n on on nn on 7 on an o 7 on O 3 ,2 30 3 .111 ow 3S1 d 322 3 m RR 302 c c c a Wit- c a w O V c c 1T c i 07. -OD. '0 co '0 7. 'O 7. O 55 VD. b G C 4'C 5'C C C C p Q. ii 6 g 3`z 3'Z 3`z o 3 3`z a 3', 3'Z o 0 3'fiCCCCC -- CCO CCC7CC 0"C 0' 0C S0aO"C S QC f ;D f0 fm mm f0 E m E m dm f m IIS. a• C m aC C d N a C 3 m FA Ctt7 m C m m cr a C D-0 g O m 0 7 7 m O 0- m O m O SS m O O am am am 5> "m 5 am am >> am 3 3 3 m m 3 m 3 3 :CLUE 'm Clmwf77mm7N77C) C) 2 1 ci ci ci a s ci a ci m RB. d t).4 7 7 .. 22 7 C 7 7 C C 7 a, m a2C m m m m O 2 2 1r)-2 N 2 2 _ 2 tit 7 O. a a a a a a rtmmmv8mmCOI COO COmCO0COCDCDCDmmCDCD c0 Con I- r r r a• x r 2. r a mfff0 , E,0 m m o°o `, m m mwm13 o CD Z 40 $ E r IacogommmmmA 3 3 w 3 m8 m d d = p A m CD CD CD CD m m m m a b o O 0 p3p p8. p a _ 8. _ a _ g r7 a N N N N a t0 m tp m CO A A )n N 3 3 6) N N g d - • 1 pNNNmmNmCD I- r r- r a• 2 r 8. r o y p Z. s'0 f f y s f m E .4 i 4 m m b o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o bs„ 6. 0ft $ v v v $ v v v v _ n C CD m m m 8 8 2 2 m 8 2 % g. tl U 0' Q O' O' 0- Q Q Q Q' b y CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD f > > > ID i s A.• 0. 0. } (k k 7 E 0 / / } . )} G 0 ac, 1 Fir. 2 90) Itt co / co 14.4 9 ; K { r 0 M 2 2 ¥ 2 E2 20EaEQE. FIT m \ w 2 >2 >2 >Z >Z >Z >Z >Z >Z >Z $ ? EP. CD CD m , , a ftli F I- r r T.Q x _; 2 2 2 a 2 Ei t § P 44: «0 k 0 ° ill 2 2 2 0 E E 2 a 2 aKCD . § 7 a CD CD CD ZS63131O m m a m " % \ t et 20 ƒ F A % ii E E E E E E E E \ 2 m m won m xen x m92 m ƒ £ 'Z .c,') Lin CD CD /(i CD (}( ( %($ CD § » \ i ( A1 m W. m m , I 5 o A @t / a a z ( 9, ( z z ( ( l' ® CD CD > > / » > > > » ( ( \ 2 } r r 44. 2 2 2 2 E a 2 2 $ § § 13 l (\ MCP i f ` / o m o m K K K K ; ; e 8 a ECD o 2 a a a | A. re CPI E m m , g m , e # PI 7 f $ 7 2 rto 7 C \ r C \ r / 2 Co 2 2Nts 3. e) A ro }{ / ; 7oR [ % 22 A o C F.a( k 1 r rt E E % 77 g ° \ 8 @ n 2 E k & / P. A n k 2 \ {k ( k 0 ± 6 P. o 130n''4.:,:, I --I 0 2 @ = ; 2 E 0 IQ . ' Cr 0 r Co(1) C 11) m 2 CZa m q % o { cr E m f ƒ q 0 (C) X1 . n G ft 2 k 6 »0 D o 1 E . ° %2 5 n @SAAgPelm , 2 p ? Jg q CD * $ ft } 4. I P E a E o / 7 2 %in in o / a / 0A \ k K , / § a.a. 1 r ° ? \ { a01 '0.. 12 k \ \ Ek Cr a R2t. , C 0 o r o a $ cl z2k2 ; §2 a \ ƒg 2 R ; 0 8 § { {k $ cr e 70 2k ft •••• k@ (g r P r0 » 0 » C / /nty MnRAM: Site Response Record For Wetland: Avienda WL1 Location: 10-116-23-23-001 Avienda Plant Community: Fresh(Wet)Meadow57 Commercial crop--hydro impact NA Adjacent area slope Cowardin Classification:Circular 39: 26-A Gentle 0% PEMAd Type 1 Groundwater-specific questions 26-B Moderate 100% Plant Community: Shallow Marsh 58 Wetland soils Recharge SteepP Subwatershed land useCowardinClassification:Circular 39: 59Recharge PEMCd Type 3 60 Wetland size/soil group Recharge 4 Listed,rare,special species? No 27 Downstream sens./WQprotect. B 61 Wetland hydroperiod Recharge 62 Inlet/Outlet configuration Discharge 5 Rare community or habitat? No 28 Nutrient loading B 63 Upland topo relief Recharge 6 Pre-European-settlement condition? No Hydrogeomorphology/topography: 29 Shoreline wetland? No Additional information 7 Depressional/FlowThru Shoreline Wetland 64 Restorationpotential No 30 Rooted veg.,%cover 0% 65 LO affected by restoration 8_1 Maximum water depth 6 inches inundated 50% 31 Wetland in-water width 0 feet 8-2 G6 Existing size 1.03 Immediate drainage--local WS 40 acres 32 Emerg.veg.erosion resistance 09Restorablesize 33 Erosion potential ofsite 10 Esimated size/existing site: (see#66) Potential new wetland 0 34 Upslope veg./bankprotection 11-Upland Soil 35 Rare wildlife? No 67 Average width ofpot.buffer 0 feet 11-Wetland Soil 36 Scare/Rare/S1/S2 community No 68 Ease ofpotential restoration 37 Vegetative cover NA 69 Hydrologic alterations 0 38 Veg.community interspersion c 70 Potential wetland type 0 39 Wetlanddetritus B 71 Stor•mwater sensitivity B 12 Outletforflood control B 40 Interspersion on landscape B 72 Additional treatment needs C 13 Outletfor hydro regime C 41 Wildlife barriers B Watershed Minnesota(Shakopee) 14 Dominant upland land use C WS# 33 Service Area: 9 15 Wetland soil condition A Amphibian-breedingpotential For functional ratings, please run the 16 Vegetation(%cover) 100% 42 Hydroperiod adequacy Adequate Summary tab report. 17 Emerg.vegflood resistance B 43 Fish presence A This report printed on: 12/9/2016 18 Sediment delivery B 44 Overwintering habitat C 19 Upland soils(soilgroup) B 45 Wildlife species(list) 20 Stormwater runoff A 46 Fish habitat quality NA 21 Subwatershed wetland density B 47 Fish species(list) 22 Channels/sheetflow C 48 Unique/rare opportunity No 23 Adjacent buffer width 20 feet 49 Wetland visibility C Adjacent area management 50 Proximity topopulation No 24-A Full 100% S) Public ownership C 24-B Manicured 0%S2 Public access C 24-C Bare 0%S3 Human influence on wetland B Adjacent area diversity/structure 54 Human influence on viewshed C 25-A Native 0%55 Spatial buffer A 25-B Mixed 100% 56 Recreational activity potential C 25-C Sparse 0% cof T. f r 0 0. § CD tv n L1%1 o 2 WO`2 52A nE © @o m O o I- o \ % ( $ k \o m / E § c E. § m 2 et z te) ( ID \ 7 S f k 22 RM R. g 2 E. i * ' 0 A n 4i7 2 13 13 13 « 2 0 ] ; AmalEIA. n ci E Q ƒ ƒ 2 0 } \ 5o. q A anD2Q 2 2 2 $ ; cn i o o § ; m S. 0$ „ § 2 m \ ( % ƒ Cl) f co k\ k 3 k k m 9 z o ma. 0. o 2 E E Q f 2 o // / n 4.2 3 0( ( , i ro o 0 00 - R § o \ 01 RI U 5 O)4 g o g E Z.z 7i. it 7 72t } ( i o . 0 J .1 ( 40.. E 2 E o E 2okokoKo c / I o ? \ \O. 4K 2 ® . © 0 ` t ` 4 lt ` ( ii 0 r@ g r P tl 3 4 z o E oo ! o « o « 6 \ / t -g 0 fgymrt4ok D. 0 2 k E | iii o ± o ± o .0 o 3 / 7 l 7 0 7 0 5 § ' 10 0 0- k k i ®k m m _ MnRAM: Site Response Record For Wetland: Avienda WL2 Location: 10-116-23-23-001 Avienda Plant Community: Shallow,Open Water C 25-A Native 0%55 Spatial buffer A Cowardin Classification:Circular 39: 25-B Mixed 0%S6 Recreational activitypotential C PUBG Type 5 25-C .Sparse 100% Plant Community: Fresh(Wet)Meadow S7 Commercial crop--hydro impact NA Cowardin Classification:Circular 39: Adjacent area slope PEMBd Type 2 26-A Gentle 0%Groundwater-specific questions Plant Community: Fresh(Wet)Meadow 26-B Moderate 100% S8 Wetland soils Recharge Cowardin Classification:Circular 39: 26-C Steep 0%59 Subwatershed land use Recharge PEMAd Type 1 60 Wetland size/soil group Recharge 4 Listed,rare,special species? No 61 Wetland hydroper•iod Discharge 27 Downstream sens./WQprotect. B 62 Inlet/Outlet configuration Discharge 5 Rare community or habitat? No 28 Nutrient loading B 63 Upland topo relief Recharge 6 Pre-European-settlement condition? No Hydrogeomorphology/topography: 29 Shoreline wetland? No Additional information 7 Depressional/Tributary G4 Restorationpotential No Shoreline Wetland 65 LO affected by restoration 8_] Maximum water depth 60 inche 30 Rooted veg., %cover• 0% 8_2 %inundated 60% 31 Wetland in-water width 0 feet 66 Existing size 2.33 9 Immediate drainage--local WS 40 acres 32 Emerg.veg.erosion resistanceRestorable size 0 10 Esimated size/existing site: (see#66) 33 Erosion potential ofsite Potential new wetland 0 34 Upslope veg./bankprotection 11-Upland Soil No 67 Average width ofpot.buffer 0 feet 35 Rare wildlife? Ease ofpotential restoration11-Welland Soil 36 Scare/Rare/S1/S2 community No 68 69 Hydrologic alterations 0 37 Vegetative cover B 70 Potential wetland type 0 38 Veg.community interspersion C 71 Stor•mwater sensitivity B 39 Wetland detritus B 72 Additional treatment needs C 12 Outletforflood control C 40 Interspersion on landscape B 13 Outletfor hydro regime B 41 wildlife ban•iers B Watershed Minnesota(Shakopee) 14 Dominant upland land use C WS# 33 Service Area: 9 15 Wetland soil condition C Amphibian-breeding potential For functional ratings, please run the 16 Vegetation(%cover) 80% 42 Hydroperiod adequacy Adequate Summary tab report. 17 Emerg.vegflood resistance NA43 Fish presence A This report printed on: 12/9/2016 18 Sediment delireiy B 44 Overwintering habitat B 19 Upland soils(soilgroup) B 45 Wildlife species(list) 20 Stormwater runoff A 21 Subwatershed wetland density B 46 Fish habitat quality NA 47 Fish species(list) 22 Channels/sheet flow A 48 Unique/rare opportunity No 23 Adjacent buffer width 0 feet 49 Wetland visibiliy C Adjacent area management 50 Proximity to population No 24-A Full 0% 51 Public ownership C 24-B Manicured 0% 52 Public access C 24-C Bare 100% 53 Human influence on wetland B Adjacent area diversity/structure S4 Human influence on viewshed C n pID7 E 7 0. J Q. § 2 t k k 7 Qm 3 S. rt 2 et ro f 2nAeZE • 2 . ¥ %. ft E E / \ f ( A 2ill ° / & - o kk cm 0. 4 c 4 CO iii k z ) r ( e f P - . `o ¥ & | g ft E [ / COI\ trk QIt QQ. 02 en pz r- 2 %/ k ( 5,7 0 I> k \ k to2 o. m 4 co 0co TS $ ( n n \ tomn. 0 o o. o' n' to 3 K t 56. co k 4- z o R 8 ( CT I K f N. m E P §• ; , # O i13 tn,2 ƒmak xi - n Gel 3 b g ( J2 0 k `ia @ { 2 ok t 2 [ 5 4 Z' z f ms s Z. q @ ( B lo A § k § i P (B ( 4coco / 4 .4 00 a. P E P 7 o k /t ; \ o 0 ? 7\ \ o ( ` I K 2 .,t3 ; » Ca \ n § 2 a. ; Oz » k , \ % P o @ 7 0 o ! o o nc. tk , lir.,o 1 0 $ K ; $ E 9rg • / 3 B 1 \ CrP000 rte MnRAM: Site Response Record For Wetland: Avienda WL3 Location: 10-116-23-23-001 Avienda Plant Community: Fresh(Wet)Meadow Adjacent area slope Cowardin Classification:Circular 39: 26-A Gentle 100% Groundwater-specific questions PEMA Type 1 26-B Moderate 0%S8 Wetland soils Recharge 26-C Steep 0%59 Subwatershed land use Recharge 4 Listed,rare,specialspecies? No 60 Wetland size/soilgroup Recharge 5 61 Wetland hydroperiod Recharge Rare community or habitat? No 27 Downstream sens./WQprotect. A 62 Inlet/Outlet configuration Recharge 6 Pre-European-settlement condition? No 63 Upland topo relief Recharge 28 Nutrient loading B Hydrogeomorphology/topography: 7 Depressional/Tributary Additional information 29 Shoreline wetland? No 64 Restoration potential No 8_j Maximum water depth 8 inches Shoreline Wetland 65 LO affected by restoration 8_2 %inundated 5% 30 Rooted veg.,%cover 0% 9 Immediate drainage--local WS 20 acres 31 Wetland in-water width 0 feet 66 Existing size 0.58 10 Esimated size/existing site: (see#66) 32 Emerg.veg.erosion resistance Restorable size 0 33 Erosion potential ofsite Potential new wetland 0 11-Upland Soil 34 Upslope veg./bankprotection 67 Average width ofpot.buffer 0 feet 11-WetlandSoil 35 Rare wildlife? No 68 Ease ofpotential restoration 36 Scare/Rare/S1/S2 community No 69 Hydrologic alterations 0 37 Vegetative cover NA 70 Potential wetland type 0 38 Veg.community interspersion NA 71 Stormwater sensitivity B 12 Outletforflood control B 39 Wetland detritus B 72 Additional treatment needs C j3 Outletfor hydro regime A 40 Interspersion on landscape B 14 Dominant upland land use C B Watershed Minnesota(Shakopee) 15 Wetlandsoil condition A 41 Wildlife barriers WS# 33 Service Area: 9 16 Vegetation(%cover) 100% Amphibian-breeding potential For functional ratings, please run the 17 Emerg.vegflood resistance B Summarytab report.42 Hydroperiod adequacy Adequate 18 Sediment delivery A This report printed on: 12/13/2016 43 Fish presence A 19 Upland soils(soil group) B 44 Overwintering habitat 20 Stormwater runoff A 45 Wildlife species(list) 21 Subwatershedwetland density B 22 Channels/sheetflow A 46 Fish habitat quality NA 47 Fish species(list) 23 Adjacent buffer width 0 feet 48 Unique/rare opportunity No Adjacent area management 49 Wetland visibility B 24-A Full 0% 24-B Manicured 0%50 Proximity to population Yes 24-C Bare 100%51 Public ownership C 52 Public access B Adjacent area diversity/structure 53 Human influence on wetland B 25-A Native 0% 54 Human influence on viewshed C 25-B Mixed 0% 55 Spatial buffer B 25-C Sparse 100% 56 Recreational activity potential C S7 Commercial crop--hydro impact NA D IDT a El 5. " N 7 "` til. O. • til.o ti p b 0. S N Z C n ti p O 3 ti A C A A to N t Pp O r r' rtsr) o n K Sao o' 5.o x O W W n m N c Afi9Nl' '' y o . n a m oQ tirA0nCNR ? .'•. R o 7 R rr o 4, l 1 rin a w 1 e fezwznoCA c'DO 0 coQ yE74. o S. co V O o + n• Zr, TsOp. ti 3 O t. R W e..4.e..4.m ° n' P. mnSAo.sn m `' a o n o a 2 cy fW w z. Sn CFO `SO i-'.V Y O n' o CDv mN CI) N n N CD '0S Rba TAnreho T N f w $ : R 5 m O a fi c c M 3- SN o Z coa. o O vO ~ O R 2 W .7 0 Q e RIp R C. ]'y W A, .1 y Q W ' o•CRD0 rl co m s ed4 A 4 yO0 y O C• to p' ti C 1 0 wl' W o g 3 O 1' a,4.W .@ p O C. OZ \ b C z P C • fp oDD o y b 1 4. 0 3 1 a 0 ro a Q ' p ... .2 = W bC A A y N W a o r o p f a yy a 0 ti y r o s fD j 2 a rir ca• z. a a' R 13 o r o a R s 0) o f 0 ' A A D c o oq C v o eR e v_ 8 .n O o O c c g•• s. a R RWR It C N. 0 y R p RoI- o o ; , i o f o p dQ A MnRAM: Site Response Record For Wetland:Avienda WL4 Location: 10-116-23-23-001 Avienda Plant Community: Fresh(Wet)Meadow Adjacent area slope Cowardin Classification:Circular 39: 26-A Gentle 0%Groundwater-specific questions PEMAd Type 1 26-B Moderate 100% S8 Wetland soils Recharge 26-C Steep 0%59 Subwatershed land use Recharge 4 Listed,rare,special species? No 60 Wetland size/soil group Recharge 5 Rare community or habitat? No 61 Wetland hydroperiod Recharge 27 Downstream sens./WQprotect. B 62 Inlet/Outlet configuration Recharge 6 Pre-European-settlement condition? No 63 Upland topo relief Recharge 28 Nutrient loading B Hydrogeomorphology/topography: 7 Depressional/FlowThru Additional information 29 Shoreline wetland? No G4 Restoration potential No 8_1 Maximum water depth 6 inches Shoreline Wetland 65 LO affected by restoration8-2 %inundated 50% 30 Rooted veg.,%cover 0% 9 Immediate drainage--local WS 40 acres 31 Wetland in-water width 0 feet 66 Existingsize 0.13 10 Esimated size/existing site: (see#66) 32 Emerg.veg.erosion resistance Restorable size 0 33 Erosion potential ofsite Potential new wetland 0 11-Upland Soil 34 Upslope veg./bankprotection 11-Wetland Soil 67 Average width ofpot.buffer 0 feet 35 Rare wildlife? No 68 Ease ofpotential restoration 36 Scare/Rare/S1/S2 community No 69 Hydrologic alterations 0 37 Vegetative cover NA 70 Potential wetland type 0 38 Veg.community interspersion NA 7] Stormwater sensitivity B 12 Outletforflood control C 39 Wetlanddetritus B 72 Additional treatment needs C 13 Outletfor hydro regime C Dominant upland land use C 40 Interspersion on landscape B 14 P A Watershed Minnesota(Shakopee) 5 Wetland soil condition A 41 Wildlife barriers WS# 33 Service Area: 9 16 Vegetation(%cover) 100% Amphibian-breeding potential For functional ratings, please run the 17 Emerg.vegflood resistance B Summarytab report.42 Hydroperiod adequacy Adequate p 18 Sediment delivery B This report printed on: 12/9/2016 43 Fish presence A 19 Upland soils(soilgroup) B 44 Overwintering habitat 20 Stormwater runoff A 21 Subwatershed wetland density B 45 lVildlifespecies(list) 22 Channels/sheetflow c 46 Fish habitat quality NA 47 Fish species(list) 23 Adjacent buffer width 50 feet 48 Unique/rare opportunity No Adjacent area management 49 Wetland visibility C 24-A Full 100%1 24-B Manicured 0%50 Proximity topopulation No 24-C Bare 0%5] Public ownership C S2 Public access C Adjacent area diversity/structure 53 Human influence on wetland B 25-A Native 0% 54 Human influence on viewshed B 25-B Mixed 100% 55 Spatial buffer A 25-C Sparse 0% 56 Recreational activity potential C 57 Commercial crop--hydro impact NA CDD 7 f f 7 ftcoTi \ E 2cu o e m qm 3 rt 111 k k 0 n Eo A O it e) Lla 2ft2Q22 \] R0 m CM P.' Z. 0. PI z Q P § \ E0Ig P. 2 E ` §n ¥ 53 2 0n f CA kgtk % E ( / kQ a. E 0 w CD H D k $ b aka 91 r0 2 / § m 0 E ; ; t E nt, ., Em Inkk t f 2 3 i8 a. 2 k 03a m 0 \/, / G 3 ti 9- 'i" LzkkCZR E CD 40 t ) 21-:1 LE' I ou to. o A' 2 / q 0 77 0 2 q 2E xCDSI1. « ~ E ( t m 4, P E P $ 7Eh o ! G o 7 / m f ; \ ( I 0 1 # (a, 1 ; E . oo ; k Er . ) § . `4" 4 ( | c ; , a 2 13 0 E ® 4 f r if 0 ¥o ! %k P t k a a P § ) E22 & % - | ; P r P 4 3 k / 2 G ¢k /0 , Icy MnRAM: Site Response Record For Wetland: Avienda WL5 Location: 10-116-23-23-001 Avienda Plant Community: Seasonally Flooded Ba Adjacent area slope Cowardin Classification:Circular 39: 26-A Gentle 0%Groundwater-specific questions PEMAd Type 1 26-B Moderate 100% S8 Wetland soils Recharge 26-C Steep 0%59 Subwaier•shed land use Recharge 4 Listed,rare,special species? No 60 Wetland size/soil group Recharge 5 Rare community or habitat? No 61 Wetland hydroperiod Recharge 27 Downstream sens./WQprotect. B 62 Inlet/Outlet configuration Recharge 6 Pre-European-settlement condition? No 63 Upland topo relief Recharge 28 Nutrient loading C Hydrogeomorphology/topography: 7 Depressional/Tributary Additional information 29 Shoreline wetland? No G4 Restorationpotential Yes 8-1 Maximum water depth 1 inches Shoreline Wetland 8_2 %inundated 100% 65 LO affected by restoration A 30 Rootedveg., cover 0 k 9 Immediate drainage--local WS 20 acres 3) Wetland in-water width 0 feet 66 Existing size 0.36 10 Esimatedsize/existing site: (see#66) 32 Emerg.veg.erosion resistance Restorable size 0 33 Erosion potential ofsite Potential new wetland 0 11-Upland Soil 34 Upslope veg./bankprotection 11-Wetland Soil 67 Average width ofpot.buffer 30 feet 35 Rare wildlife? No 68 Ease ofpotential restoration A 36 Scare/Rare/S1/S2 community No 69 Hydrologic alterations Drain 37 Vegetative cover NA Tiles, Lowere 38 Veg.community interspersion NA d Outlet 12 Outletforflood control C 39 Wetlanddetritus C 70 Potential wetland type 1 13 Outletfor hydro regime C 40 Interspersion on landscape B 71 Stormwatersensitivity C 14 Dominant upland land use C 41 Wildlife barriers B 72 Additional treatment needs A IS Wetlandsoil condition C 16 Vegetation(%cover) 50% Watershed Minnesota(Shakopee) 17 Emerg.vegflood resistance C Amphibian-breedingpotential WS# 33 Service Area: 9 42 Hydroperiod adequacy Inadequate 18 Sediment delivery B For functional ratings, please run the43FishpresenceAg , 19 Upland soils(soilgroup) B Summary tab report.44 Overwintering habitat This report printed on: 12/13/2016 Z0 Stormwater runoff A 45 Wildlife species(list) 21 Subwatershed wetland density B 22 Channels/sheetflow A 46 Fish habitat quality NA 47 Fish species(list) 23 Adjacent buffer width 0 feet 48 Unique/rare opportunity No Adjacent area management 49 Wetland visibility C 24-A Full 0% 24-B Manicured 0%50 Proximity topopulation No 24-C Bare 100% 5) Public ownership C 52 Public access C Adjacent area diversity/structure 53 Human influence on wetland C 25-A Native 0% 54 Human influence on viewshed C 25-B Mixed 0% 55 Spatial buffer C 25-C Sparse 100% 56 Recreational activity potential C 57 Commercial crop--hydro impact C I m f § 7 $ r 00 o r / E0 cm a) ® 0,11coO et 5Q / 0. 2o # Z ro \ 5 ( E t t....1 2R / cz Z. R m ca ca 0 Z.4. i 7 t 2 SU( \ % 6 z 2). Co 0 a $ & §Ip 2ken ,c.t., G 13 ,A 0 _ . a a. g / 0 ° ( { § § o. t E a D co t hof, = 0 @ q2 of § a., 0' z 11E (( t k o E P m 8 [ f E m k,/ ƒ q e :P k fil© met / } 3 kJ /k 8 .a0 Z.E ' ' co 0 4. Se: 0 CO m ( B2 o k 2 \ k \ 0 777 2 22 Z2 b 2k ( P a ocrtJd \ kk P E 2 / o ! oCfe f Z E 9 ? \ (0. - x , 21 e co so4a ,2 $ 7 ; tom Jn ( (o U.E k § k \ ( • P r P a - k J k2 / °\ f k f k a eE §cr E g r g * 7 3 0 moC § A /14. ` lk. MnRAM: Site Response Record For Wetland:Avienda WL6 Location: 10-116-23-23-001 Avienda Plant Community: Fresh(Wet)Meadow Adjacent area slope Cowardin Classification:Circular 39: 26-A Gentle 0%Groundwater-specific questions PEMAd Type 1 26-B Moderate 25% 58 Wetland soils Recharge 26-C Steep 75% 59 Subwatershed land use Recharge 4 Listed,rare,special species? No 60 Wetland size/soilgroup Recharge 5 Rare commnmit'or habitat? No 6] Wetland hvdroperiod Recharge 6 Pre-European-settlement condition. No 27 Downstream sens./WQprotect. A 62 Inlet/Outlet configuration Recharge 28 Nutrient loading C 63 Upland topo relief Recharge Hydrogeotnorphology/topography: 7 Depressional/Tributary Additional information 29 Shoreline wetland? No 64 Restoration potential No8-1 Maximum water depth 0 inches Shoreline Wetland8-2 %inundated 0% 65 LO affected by restoration 30 Rooted veg., %cover 0% 9 Immediate drainage--local iVS 20 acres 3] Wetland in-water width 0 feet 66 Existing size 0.78 10 Esimated size/existing site: (see#66) 32 Emerg.veg.erosion resistance Restorable size 0 11-Upland Soil 33 Erosion potential ofsite Potential new wetland 0 34 Upslope veg./bank protection11-Wetland Soil G7 Average width ofpot.bu fer 0 feet 35 Rare wildlife? No 68 Ease ofpotential restoration 36 Scare/Rare/S7/S2 community No 69 Hydrologic alterations 0 37 Vegetative cover NA 70 Potential wetland type 0 12 Outletforflood control C 38 Veg.communityinterspersion NA 71 Stormwater•sensitivity B 13 Outletfor hydro regime C 39 Wetland detritus B 72 Additional treatment needs C 40 Interspersion on landscape B14DominantuplandlanduseB Watershed Minnesota(Shakopee) 1S 41 Wildlife barriers CWetlandsoilconditionAWS# 33 Service Area: 9 16 Vegetation(%cover) 100% 17 Emerg.vegflood resistance B Amphibian-breeding potential For functional ratings, please run the 42 Hydroperiod adequacy Inadequate Summary tab report. 18 Sediment delivery A This report printed on: 12/9/201643FishpresenceA 19 Upland soils(soilgroup) B 44 Overwintering habitat 20 Stonm,'ater rune A 45 Wildlife species(list)21 S'ubwatershed wetland density C 22 Channels/sheetflow B 46 Fish habitat quality NA 47 Fish species(list) 23 Adjacent buffer width 50 feet 48 Unique/rare opportunity No Adjacent area management 49 Wetland risibilivisibilityB24-A Full 100% 24-B Manicured 0%50 Proximity topopulation Yes 24-C Bare 0%51 Public ownership C S2 Public access C Adjacent area diversity/structure 53 Human influence on wetland B 25-A Native 0% 54 Human influence on viewshed C 25-B Mixed 100% 55 Spatial buffer B 25-C Sparse 0% 56 Recreational activity potential C 57 Commercial crop--hydro impact NA I D 7 f 2 f z 7 CL 2 CI Z. CD iii r- 2 5o 2 ft2I. QQ $ n IE5' @o & e o \ % ( i 7k .7 2 N / % § A EI k T k n * 2 Co It- j k et E z 3 $ Co 0 P. 4 Ft' E\ § o m o C4 0'Sf n r ? Z 0 P \ \ ii 2 91 co a D o ht =22 , m co o §g 2 N. ki..1. z @ s 5 C cr E r) 2G ° ( n o (ƒ 2 G $b o tr f J % k 8 \ D E ( ( )2' k 2 g g E o l o § \ 2 777 7k10. , 8 \ \ ( m E \ Je s ^ .E 4. 2 E 7 2 a.Oz o ! o00 z.„0. o ? \ (a r0IZZ. ,a k ) § kg ` s 0 13 m E © 2 ( Ce i o » o ! s0. et m 2 o 7K ! )2 m % E ! g ° o r 0 0 7 7 k ! cm 2 & prQ /mak MnRAM: Site Response Record For Wetland:Avienda WL7/8 Location: 10-116-23-23-001 Avienda Plant Community: Fresh(Wet)Meadow Adjacent area slope Cowardin Classification:Circular 39: 26-A Gentle 0%Groundwater-specific questions PEMAd Type 1 26-B Moderate 100% S8 Wetland soils Recharge 26-C Steep 0%59 Subwatershed land use Recharge 4 Listed,rare,special species? No 60 Wetland size/soilgroup Recharge 5 Rare community or habitat? No 61 Wetland hydroperiod Recharge 27Downstream sens./WQ protect. B 6 Pre-European-settlement condition? No 62 Inlet/Outlet configuration Discharge 63 Upland topo relief Discharge 28 Nutrient loading B Hydrogeomorphology/topography: 7 DepressionailTributary Additional information 29 Shoreline wetland? No J 64 Restorationpotential No 8-1 Maximum water depth 0 inches Shoreline Wetland 8-2 %inundated 0% 65 LO affected by restoration 30 Rooted veg.,%cover 0% 9 Immediate drainage--local WS 20 acres 31 Wetland in-water width 0 feet 66 Existing size 0.08 10 Esimated size/existing site: (see#66) 32 Emerg.veg.erosion resistance Restorable size 0 11-Upland Soil 33 Erosion potential ofsite Potential new wetland 0 34 Upslope veg./bankprotection 11-Wetland Soil 67 Average width ofpot buffer 0 feet 35 Rare wildlife? No 68 Ease ofpotential restoration 36 Scare/Rare/S1/S2 community No 69 Hydrologic alterations 0 37 Vegetative cover NA 70 Potential wetland type 0 38 Veg.community interspersion NA 71 Stormwater sensitivity B 12 Outletforflood control C 13 Outletfor hydro regime C 39 Wetland detritus B 72 Additional treatment needs C Dominant upland land use C 40 Interspersion on landscape B 14 P C Watershed Minnesota(Shakopee) 15 Wetlandsoil condition B 41 Wildlife barriers WS# 33 Service Area: 9 16 Vegetation(Si cover) 100% Amphibian-breedingpotential For functional ratings,please run the 17 Emerg.vegflood resistance B Summarytab report.42 Hydroperiod adequacy Inadequate 18 Sediment delivery B This report printed on: 12/9/2016 43 Fish presence A 19 Upland soils(soilgroup) B 44 Overwintering habitat Z0 Stormwater runoff A 21 Subwatershed wetland density B 45 Wildlife species(list) 22 Channels/sheetflow C 46 Fish habitat quality I NA 47 Fish species(list) 23 Adjacent buffer width 0 feet 48 Unique/rare opportunity No Adjacent area management 49 Wetlandvisibility C 24-A Full 0% 24-B Manicured 0%50 Proximity topopulation No 24-C Bare 100% 51 Public ownership C 52 Public access C Adjacent area diversity/structure 53 Human influence on wetland C 25-A Native 0% 54 Human influence on viewshed C 25-B Mixed 0% 55 Spatial buffer C 25-C Sparse 100% 56 Recreational activity potential C S7 Commercial crop--hydro impact NA CDD 0 c c r4 c / 2 co ƒ G CD 0.'O k eN mnk t Ekk 2Dc i $ ( E2B / $ ; 422 ; 4 ten « k\ | A. 0 2 c \ kkz777 2 f ... ` 2.g 2 E * / Peekn ¥o nn z 777 2 M47 0 4 ] | ( 2 K " 0 20 ( ` a A'.E o A co a m = Sli o o ( § m ro ezi § 20 ( ( ( % ftn \ C 0 2 o co Li A r - i. .1.1,5.1,2 0 ftf ( 1:1 SI RJ \ wk822co2 / [ e o, k P m. % A. Al k aa S ( 7 a o ? 7 m EV It'. m Je 222 4. 2 E cp o / a. o k 4 O / m Cr ; \ I.Cr r o © (M. - J / ; 2 fc | ev g- ° ` ` ` a Ak ` \ % u E 2 z em g o o f. Ak , a g o o ƒ k % co2 & a. .• P r P 3 / 7 k@ K. 2 GcrQ ¢ •-e 14 , E 1 MnRAM: Site Response Record For Wetland: Avienda WL9 Location: 10-116-23-23-001 Avienda Plant Community: Seasonally Flooded Ba Adjacent area slope Cowardin Classification:Circular 39: 26-A Gentle 0%Groundwater-specific questions PEMAd Type 1 26-B Moderate 100% 58 Wetland soils Recharge 26-C Steep 0%59 Subwatershed land use Recharge 4 Listerd,rare,special species? No 60 Wetland size/soil group Recharge 5 Rare community or habitat? No 61 Wetland hydroperiod Recharge 27 Downstream sens./WQprotect. B 62 Inlet/Outlet configuration Recharge 6 Pre-European-settlement condition? No63 Upland topo relic/ Recharge 28 Nutrient loading C Hydrogeomorphology/topography: 7 Depressional/Tributary Additional information 29 Shoreline wetland? No 64 Restoration potential Yes 8-1 Maximum~Haler depth 1 inches Shoreline Wetland 65 LO affected byrestoration A 8-2 %inundated 100% 30 Rooted veg., %cover 0% 9 Immediatedrainage--localiVS 20 acres 31 Wetland in-water width 0 feet 66 Existingsize 0.1 10 Esimatedsize/existing site: (see#66) 32 Enrerg.veg.erosion resistance Restorable size 0 11-Upland Soil 33 Erosion potential ofsite Potential new wetland 0 34 Upslope veg./bankprotection 11-Wetland Soil 67 Average width ofpot.buffer 30 feet 35 Rare wildlife? No 68 Ease ofpotential restoration C 36 Scare/Rare/S1/S2 community No 69 Hydrologic alterations Lowere 37 Vegetative cover NA d Outlet 38 Veg.community interspersion NA 70 Potential wetland type 1 12 Outletforflood control C 71 Storm water sensitivity C Wetland detritus C 13 Outletfor hydro regime C 39 72 Additional treatment needs A 40 Interspersion on landscape B 14 Dominant upland land use c 5 Wetland soil condition C 41 Wildlife barriers B Watershed Minnesota(Shakopee) 16 Vegetation(41,cover) 50% WS# 33 Service Area: 9 Amphibian-breeding potential 17 Emerg.vegflood resistance c 42 Hyd,operiod adequacy Inadequate For functional ratings, please run the 18 Sediment delivery B Summary tab report. 43 Fish presence A This report printed on: 12/13/2016 19 Upland soils(soilgroup) B 44 Overwintering habitat 20 Stormwater runoff A 21 Subtiwatershed wetland density B 45 Wildlife species(list) 22 Channels/sheet•flow A 46 Fish habitat quality NA 47 Fish species(list) 23 Adjacent buffer width 0 feet 48 Unique/rare opportunity NO Adjacent area management 49 Wetland risibility C 24-A Full 0% 24-B Manicured 0%50 Proximity topopulation No 24-C Bare 100% 51 Public ownership C S2 Public access C Adjacent area diversity/structure 53 Human influence on wetland C 25-A Native 0% 54 Human influence on viewshed C 25-B Mixed 0% 55 Spatial buffer C 25-C Sparse 100% 56 Recreational activity potential C 57 Commercial crop--hydro impact C D C co E co ti N R ti H. a b a A n ' il. a o o 4opR0.1133nR co o bco 1 0) co n c• c a CD x S o G R n 3 v 4 n ti. co .n, o c m o CZopC7A , O .1. 3 N W A 9 n R Z R N O CO, o o R, w Z d ° rt o y a S Nt cont..O DCI0oRn corz e g. a p. i z 3crZ: 0 3 m n `°m etiFT TA:fi a n o o R C a OaOO a0 T 0 t" A ro A o• a n c m 1 s -4 o Z. se # a oo I n w ribAOoCn n' x7 h o R e cn nb 13 CO Za,. a . o c a m = °' ; CD ti s o q3z 3mooiaoon m65 o . Cl)r eT C o CM y do• oA q a. O °n °s A IS: 0 0 0 h b d 2A z a:, it, a O 4 A C m cp o. C o ? i"7 00ayf-n c cI. O A 0 a z 2. ro b in Z. Z k 0'p v o A c R ob crC ?, E ,.. v_ o t o a c a * z c U_ ' 3 a i R. Ar 4. a o b a c co o " a b o ft 0 o d. co Ti e S z u = a b 3.fD a 8 o otic ti s w °• ° Ra 0 0 $ a ct s 42 - a a° a Z ' 5.: p a p „ fD , a 0 z m 4t1 t,taoApo0 m m Oq a.0co cco) 4.. 0 o x o a 5 e 3 .R W p o p A ti 't ti Z 1 ti a m o ` ,••••• C - A, co y MnRAM: Site Response Record For Wetland: Avienda WL10 Location: 10-116-23-23-001 Avienda Plant Community: Seasonally Flooded Ba Adjacent area slope Cowardin Classification:Circular 39: 26-A Gentle 100% Groundwater-specific questions PF01 A Type 1 26-B Moderate 0%58 Wetland soils Recharge 26-C Steep 0%59 Subwatershed landuse Recharge 4 Listed,rare,special species? No 60 Wetland size/soilgroup Recharge 5 61 Wetland hydroperiod Recharge Rare community or habitat? No 27 Downstream sens./WQ protect. A 62 Inlet/Outlet configuration Recharge 6 Pre-European-settlement condition? No 63 Upland topo relief Recharge 28 Nutrient loading A Hydrogeomorphology/topography: 7 Depressional/Isolated Additional information 29 Shoreline wetland? No G4 Restoration potential No 8_1 Maximum water depth 12 inche Shoreline Wetland 65 LO affected byrestoration 8-2 %inundated 100% 30 Rooted veg.,%cover 0% 9 Immediate drainage--local WS 15 acres 31 Wetland in-water width 0 feet 66 Existingsize 0.07 10 Esimated size/existing site: (see#66) 32 Emerg.veg.erosion resistance Restorable size 0 33 Erosion potential ofsite Potential new wetland 0 11-UplandSoil 34 Upslope veg./bankprotection 11-Wetland Soil 67 Average width ofpot buffer 0 feet 35 Rare wildlife? No 68 Ease ofpotential restoration 36 Scare/Rare/S1/S2 community No 69 Hydrologic alterations 0 37 Vegetative cover NA 70 Potential wetland type 0 38 Veg.community interspersion NA 71 Stormwater sensitivity Exceptions 12 Outletforflood control B 39 Wetland detritus C 72 Additional treatment needs C 13 Outletforhydro regime A 40 Interspersion on landscape A 14 Dominant upland land use A A Watershed Minnesota(Shakopee) 5 Wetland soil condition A 41 Wildlife barriers WS# 33 Service Area: 9 16 Vegetation(%cover) 30% Amphibian-breeding potential For functional ratings, please run the 17 Emerg.vegflood resistance NA Summarytab report.42 Hydroperiod adequacy Adequate 18 Sediment delivery A This report printed on: 12/10/2016 43 Fishpresence A 19 Upland soils(soil group) B 44 Overwintering habitat 20 Stormwater runoff C 21 Subwatershedwetland density B 45 Wildlife species(list) 22 Channels/sheetflow A 46 Fish habitat quality NA 47 Fish species(list) 23 Adjacent buffer width 50 feet 48 Unique/rare opportunity No Adjacent area management 49 Wetland visibility C 24-A Full 100% 50 Proximity to population No 24-B Manicured o% 24-c Bare 0%SI Public ownership C 52 Public access C Adjacent area diversity/structure 53 Human influence on wetland A 25-A Native 75% 54 Human influence on viewshed A 25-B Mixed 25% 55 Spatial buffer I A 25-C Sparse 0% 56 Recreational activitypotential I B 57 Commercial crop--hydro impact NA D I Q Q co f Co m ry f c0 7 n c y c o A co A 3 a.4 A O`co K 7 Q O 3 y o o A. ft m S' N b r r F a- Q ti A a o A n a C a t r_ m 74 a ' R s a. o O rn *. v1 a" cso 4.1 sy w c e 0 0 o y A 4. ro s oDOa2O A V O g 4' p m Q' O O• Z. 3 0ft Cp A n',c4, 77 fti1, mm 77AnY. x- o d 0 y 0 o a R 7mcnm ;o 0 o r_..?' r s m A D CO T p t' 2 a g.O R 9vm CI w .' o CD m • V° n yyOa. o = n R 1., m oiismpaoE. P,' 3 3' C a- v tcoaZ m v ami a- c 3 q" z CD C 0 0)o. o 0 m F0 a o0 n m m Qm a s' Cr?) ti p 'UOi 3s,......,-, ti N N A 0 4WRA co O b b m Og.3 O' oo 0 0 0 a 01 ill's cmm °a C 8. o •= 3 ^7 z C 4. @ w a c z ti a c 8 g g• o. 4 d 0 oz ° i a 3 0 00 b a o m ii o@ o@ 0 ~ a te" b o 0 3 v°a m m m do a a • a 14 o o ro ,iy 0 0 4 i a' Q m N a s R^„ C m m Na a i5,3. E"'a. 10 o n o a o a o a ;o g c z c0) 0 o 03 o o Q A o a 4 0'0 O D o 0 CD m m o y 4` o o. s'O 0 c a: Q a R d R y• o o N 4 R C o N 0 Q. 0 a 0 Q, 0 z C m R a. o tD o al oa. o Q qwNmcm) .4 0'q ft MnRAM: Site Response Record For Wetland: Avienda MnDOT WL Location: 10-116-23-23-001 Avienda Plant Community: Deep Marsh 25-A Native 25% 55 Spatial buffer C Cowardin Classification:Circular 39: 25-B Mixed 50% S6 Recreational activitypotential B PEMF Type 4 25-C Sparse 25% Plant Community: Shrub Carr S7 Commercial crop--hydro impact NA Cowardin Classification:Circular 39: Adjacent area slope PSS1 B Type 6 26-A Gentle 0%Groundwater-specific questions Plant Community: Fresh(Wet)Meadow26-B Moderate 100% S8 Wetlandsoils Recharge Cowardin Classification:Circular 39: 26-C Steep 0%S9 Subwatershed land use Recharge PEM1A Type 1 60 Wetlandsize/soil group Recharge 4 Listed,rare,special species? No 61 Wetlandhydroperiod Discharge 27 Downstream sens./WQprotect. B 62 Inlet/Outlet configuration Discharge 5 Rare community or habitat? No 28 Nutrient loading B 63 Upland topo relief Discharge 6 Pre-European-settlement condition? No Hydrogeomorphology/topography: 29 Shoreline wetland? No Additional information 7 Depressional/Tributary 64 Restorationpotential No Shoreline Wetland 65 LO affected by restoration 84 Maximum waterdepth 48 inche 30 Rooted veg.,%cover 0% 8_2 %inundated 60% 31 Wetland in-water width 0 feet 66 Existingsize 11.5 9 Immediate drainage--local WS 60 acres 32 Emerg.veg.erosion resistance Restorable size 0 10 Esimated size/existing site: (see#66) 33 Erosion potential ofsite Potential new wetland 0 34 Upslope veg./bankprotection 11-UplandSoil 67 Average width ofpot.buffer 0 feet 35 Rare wildlife? No 11-Wetland Soil 68 Ease ofpotential restoration36Scare/Rare/S1/S2 community No 69 Hydrologic alterations 0 37 Vegetative cover NA 70 Potential wetland type 0 38 Veg.community interspersion B 71 Stormwater sensitivity A 39 Wetland detritus B 72 Additional treatment needs C 12 Outletforflood control B 40 Interspersion on landscape A 13 Outletfor hydro regime B 41 Wildlife barriers B Watershed Minnesota(Shakopee) 14 Dominant upland land use B WS# 33 Service Area: 9 15 Wetland soil condition A Amphibian-breedingpotential For functional ratings, please run the 16 Vegetation(%cover) 75°i° 42 Hydroperiod adequacy Adequate Summary tab report. 17 Emerg.vegflood resistance B43 Fishpresence A This report printed on: 12/9/2016 18 Sediment delivery B 44 Overwintering habitat B 19 Upland soils(soil group) B 45 Wildlife species(list) 20 Stormwater runoff A 21 Subwatershed wetland density B 46 Fish habitat quality NA 22 Channels/sheetflow A 47 Fish species(list) 48 Unique/rare opportunity No 23 Adjacent buffer width 40 feet 49 Wetlandvisibility B Adjacent area management 50 Proximity to population Yes 24-A Full 70% 51 Public ownership A 24-B Manicured 0% S2 Public access C 24-C Bare 30% 53 Human influence on wetland A Adjacent area diversity/structure S4 Human influence on viewshed C