The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda and PacketAGENDA CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2021 CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD Electronic Meeting Due to the COVID19 pandemic, for the next few weeks it is anticipated that some or all members of the City Council will participate in meetings by telephone and/or web conference pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 13D.021,rather than in person at the city council’s regular meeting place at Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, Chanhassen, Minnesota. The Public Hearings portion of the City Council agenda allow for the public to provide comments on those agenda items. To help ensure an open public process, we have made accommodations for the public to continue to view and participate in public hearings by selecting one of three options: City Council Meetings EMAIL your comments to the City Council at publiccomments@ci.chanhassen.mn.us All comments received by 6:30 p.m. on the day of the meeting will be included as a part of the city council meeting. This is the preferred method of public participation for City Council meetings. WATCH the meeting live online at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/agendas or on Mediacom Cable Channel 107.2. The meeting begins at 7:00 pm. PHONE in your comments at 952227 1630 when the Mayor opens the desired public hearing for comment. The Mayor will take each call in the order received. ATTEND the meeting in person and present your comments when called upon. Social distancing practices will be observed during the meeting. Seating will be limited for this option. If you wish to make a public comment under the Visitor Presentations portion of the City Council agenda, please review the Guidelines for Visitor Presentations and complete and submit the online form. NOTE: For all options, you must provide your name and address for the record. A.4:30 P.M. WORK SESSION Note: Work sessions are open to the public.If the City Council does not complete the work session items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regular agenda. AGENDACHANHASSEN CITY COUNCILMONDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2021CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARDElectronic MeetingDue to the COVID19 pandemic, for the next few weeks it is anticipated that some or all members of theCity Council will participate in meetings by telephone and/or web conference pursuant to MinnesotaStatutes, Section 13D.021,rather than in person at the city council’s regular meeting place at ChanhassenCity Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, Chanhassen, Minnesota.The Public Hearings portion of the City Council agenda allow for the public to provide comments onthose agenda items. To help ensure an open public process, we have made accommodations for thepublic to continue to view and participate in public hearings by selecting one of three options:City Council MeetingsEMAILyour comments to the City Council at publiccomments@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Allcomments received by 6:30 p.m. on the day of the meeting will be included as a part of the citycouncil meeting. This is the preferred method of public participation for City Councilmeetings.WATCH the meeting live online at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/agendas or on Mediacom CableChannel 107.2. The meeting begins at 7:00 pm. PHONE in your comments at 9522271630 when the Mayor opens the desired public hearing for comment. The Mayor will take eachcall in the order received.ATTEND the meeting in person and present your comments when called upon. Social distancingpractices will be observed during the meeting. Seating will be limited for this option.If you wish to make a public comment under the Visitor Presentations portion of the City Councilagenda, please review the Guidelines for Visitor Presentations and complete and submit the online form.NOTE: For all options, you must provide your name and address for the record.A.4:30 P.M. WORK SESSIONNote: Work sessions are open to the public.If the City Council does not complete the work session items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regular agenda. 1.Interview Commission Applicants B.7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER (Pledge of Allegiance) C.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS D.CONSENT AGENDA All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council and will be considered as one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item. Refer to the council packet for each staff report. 1.Approve City Council Minutes dated February 8, 2021 2.Receive Environmental Commission Minutes dated January 13, 2021 3.Receive Senior Commission Minutes dated January 15, 2021 4.Resolution 2021XX: Resolution of Support for Galpin Blvd LRIP Grant Application 5.Resolution 2021XX: Resolution of Support for Market Blvd LRIP Grant Application 6.2021 Fleet Purchases 7.Approve Consultant Contract for Sanitary Sewer Televising GIS Inventory 8.Approve Amendment to Joint Powers Agreement of the Trunk Highway 5 Regional Trail & Underpass E.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Visitor Presentations requesting a response or action from the City Council must complete and submit the Citizen Action Request Form (see VISITOR GUIDELINES at the end of this agenda) F.FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE 1.Fire Department Update 2.Law Enforcement Update G.OLD BUSINESS H.PUBLIC HEARINGS I.NEW BUSINESS 1.Consider a Request for Variances, Including Exceeding the 1,000 SquareFoot, Detached Accessory Structure Size Limit, to Construct a Detached Garage and Add a Bathroom to an Existing Detached Structure on a Property Located at 10151 Great Plains Boulevard J.COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS K.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS L.CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION 1.2021 Building Permit Activity January Year To Date 2.Review of Claims Paid 02222021 3.2020 Citizen Action Request Forms Follow Up M.ADJOURNMENT AGENDACHANHASSEN CITY COUNCILMONDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2021CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARDElectronic MeetingDue to the COVID19 pandemic, for the next few weeks it is anticipated that some or all members of theCity Council will participate in meetings by telephone and/or web conference pursuant to MinnesotaStatutes, Section 13D.021,rather than in person at the city council’s regular meeting place at ChanhassenCity Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, Chanhassen, Minnesota.The Public Hearings portion of the City Council agenda allow for the public to provide comments onthose agenda items. To help ensure an open public process, we have made accommodations for thepublic to continue to view and participate in public hearings by selecting one of three options:City Council MeetingsEMAILyour comments to the City Council at publiccomments@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Allcomments received by 6:30 p.m. on the day of the meeting will be included as a part of the citycouncil meeting. This is the preferred method of public participation for City Councilmeetings.WATCH the meeting live online at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/agendas or on Mediacom CableChannel 107.2. The meeting begins at 7:00 pm. PHONE in your comments at 9522271630 when the Mayor opens the desired public hearing for comment. The Mayor will take eachcall in the order received.ATTEND the meeting in person and present your comments when called upon. Social distancingpractices will be observed during the meeting. Seating will be limited for this option.If you wish to make a public comment under the Visitor Presentations portion of the City Councilagenda, please review the Guidelines for Visitor Presentations and complete and submit the online form.NOTE: For all options, you must provide your name and address for the record.A.4:30 P.M. WORK SESSIONNote: Work sessions are open to the public.If the City Council does not complete the worksession items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regularagenda.1.Interview Commission ApplicantsB.7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER (Pledge of Allegiance)C.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTSD.CONSENT AGENDAAll items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council andwill be considered as one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items. Ifdiscussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and consideredseparately. City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item. Refer to thecouncil packet for each staff report.1.Approve City Council Minutes dated February 8, 20212.Receive Environmental Commission Minutes dated January 13, 20213.Receive Senior Commission Minutes dated January 15, 20214.Resolution 2021XX: Resolution of Support for Galpin Blvd LRIP Grant Application5.Resolution 2021XX: Resolution of Support for Market Blvd LRIP Grant Application6.2021 Fleet Purchases7.Approve Consultant Contract for Sanitary Sewer Televising GIS Inventory8.Approve Amendment to Joint Powers Agreement of the Trunk Highway 5 RegionalTrail & UnderpassE.VISITOR PRESENTATIONSVisitor Presentations requesting a response or action from the City Council must complete andsubmit the Citizen Action Request Form (see VISITOR GUIDELINES at the end of this agenda)F.FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE1.Fire Department Update2.Law Enforcement UpdateG.OLD BUSINESSH.PUBLIC HEARINGSI.NEW BUSINESS1.Consider a Request for Variances, Including Exceeding the 1,000 SquareFoot,Detached Accessory Structure Size Limit, to Construct a Detached Garage and Add aBathroom to an Existing Detached Structure on a Property Located at 10151 GreatPlains BoulevardJ.COUNCIL PRESENTATIONSK.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONSL.CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION1.2021 Building Permit Activity January Year To Date2.Review of Claims Paid 02222021 3.2020 Citizen Action Request Forms Follow Up M.ADJOURNMENT N.GUIDELINES GUIDELINES FOR VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Welcome to the Chanhassen City Council Meeting. In the interest of open communications, the Chanhassen City Council wishes to provide an opportunity for the public to address the City Council. That opportunity is provided at every regular City Council meeting during Visitor Presentations. Anyone seeking a response or action from the City Council following their presentation is required to complete and submit a Citizen Action Request Form. An online form is available at https://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/action or paper forms are available in the city council chambers prior to the meeting. Anyone indicating a desire to speak during Visitor Presentations will be acknowledged by the Mayor. When called upon to speak, state your name, address, and topic. All remarks shall be addressed to the City Council as a whole, not to any specific member(s) or to any person who is not a member of the City Council. If there are a number of individuals present to speak on the same topic, please designate a spokesperson that can summarize the issue. Limit your comments to five minutes. Additional time may be granted at the discretion of the Mayor. If you have written comments, provide a copy to the Council. During Visitor Presentations, the Council and staff listen to comments and will not engage in discussion. Council members or the City Manager may ask questions of you in order to gain a thorough understanding of your concern, suggestion or request. Please be aware that disrespectful comments or comments of a personal nature, directed at an individual either by name or inference, will not be allowed. Personnel concerns should be directed to the City Manager. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 22, 2021 Subject Interview Commission Applicants Section 4:30 P.M. WORK SESSION Item No: A.1. Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, Office Manager File No: ADM 146G SUMMARY During Work Session, the Council will interview the following applicants: City Council Interviews February 22, 2021 First Choice Second Choice 4:30 Chaeyun Lee Park & Rec Youth NA 4:45 Kristin Fulkerson Environmental NA 5:00 Martina Alden Planning Environmental 5:15 Ryan Soller Planning Park & Rec 5:30 Jackelyn Vilijaste Park & Rec Planning 5:45 Greg Hawks Environmental NA 6:00 Kelsey Alto Planning Environmental 6:15 Heather Markert Park & Rec NA 6:30 Stephen Kelzer Planning Park & Rec 6:45 Scot Lacek Planning Environmental BACKGROUND PLANNING COMMISSION Two 3year positions The terms of Commissioners Mark Randall and Michael McGonagill are expiring. Seven (7) first choice applications have been received. Two (2) second choice applications have been received. PARK & RECREATION COMMISSION One 2year and Three 3year positions The terms of Commissioners Joseph Scanlon and Jim Boettcher are expiring. Hayley Schubert won a city council seat leaving a 2year vacancy. Jim Boettcher has reapplied. Eight (8) first choice applications have been received. Four (4) second choice applications have been received. One or Two 1year youth positions The term of Youth Commissioner Zoe Erpelding is expiring. One (1) first choice application was received. ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION One 2year and Three 3year positions The terms of Commissioners Don Vasatka, Kristen Fulkerson, and Greg Hawks are expiring. Lucy Rehm won a city council seat leaving a 2year vacancy. Kristen Fulkerson and Greg Hawks have reapplied. Three (3) first choice applications have been received. Five (5) second choice applications have CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 22, 2021SubjectInterview Commission ApplicantsSection4:30 P.M. WORK SESSION Item No: A.1.Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, Office Manager File No: ADM 146GSUMMARYDuring Work Session, the Council will interview the following applicants:City Council InterviewsFebruary 22, 2021 First Choice Second Choice4:30 Chaeyun Lee Park & Rec Youth NA4:45 Kristin Fulkerson Environmental NA5:00 Martina Alden Planning Environmental5:15 Ryan Soller Planning Park & Rec5:30 Jackelyn Vilijaste Park & Rec Planning5:45 Greg Hawks Environmental NA6:00 Kelsey Alto Planning Environmental6:15 Heather Markert Park & Rec NA6:30 Stephen Kelzer Planning Park & Rec6:45 Scot Lacek Planning EnvironmentalBACKGROUNDPLANNING COMMISSIONTwo 3year positions The terms of Commissioners Mark Randall and Michael McGonagill are expiring.Seven (7) first choice applications have been received. Two (2) second choice applications havebeen received.PARK & RECREATION COMMISSIONOne 2year andThree 3year positions The terms of Commissioners Joseph Scanlon and Jim Boettcher are expiring. Hayley Schubert wona city council seat leaving a 2year vacancy. Jim Boettcher has reapplied.Eight (8) first choice applications have been received. Four (4) second choice applications havebeen received.One or Two1year youth positions The term of Youth Commissioner Zoe Erpelding is expiring.One (1) first choice application was received.ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION One 2year and Three 3year positions The terms of Commissioners Don Vasatka, Kristen Fulkerson, and Greg Hawks are expiring. LucyRehm won a city council seat leaving a 2year vacancy. Kristen Fulkerson and Greg Hawks have reapplied. Three (3) first choice applications have been received. Five (5) second choice applications have been received. SENIOR COMMISSION Two or Three 3year positions The terms of Commissioners David Crouch, Dorina Tipton and Mack Titus are expiring. Dorina Tipton has reapplied. Three (3) first choice applications have been received. Zero (0) second choice applications were received. NOTE: The Senior Commission bylaws allow for the appointment of 7 or 8 commissioners. DISCUSSION Additional commission interviews are scheduled for March 8 (10) starting at 4:30 p.m. and March 22 (2) starting at 5:00 p.m. All commission appointments will take place at the March 22 City Council meeting under the New Business portion of the agenda. Paper copies of the Interview Scoring Sheet and individual Commission Interview Questionnaires will be provided at the meeting. ATTACHMENTS: City Code, Section 246. Appointment to city committees and commissions 2021 Interview Schedule Interview Scoring Sheet Commission Interview Questionnaire Chaeyun Lee Application Kristin Fulkerson Application Martina Alden Application Ryan Soller Application Jackelyn Vilijaste Application Greg Hawks Application Kelsey Alto Heather Markert Application Stephen Kelzer Application Scot Lacek Application Page 1 ARTICLE IV. - BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS[4] Footnotes: --- (4) --- Cross reference— Park and recreation commission, § 14-16 et seq.; planning commission, § 15-16 et seq. State Law reference— Authority to establish advisory boards and commissions, M.S. § 412.621(2). DIVISION 1. - GENERALLY Sec. 2-46. - Appointment to city committees and commissions. All vacancies on committees, commissions, and boards shall be advertised to seek applicants. The city council may interview applicants before making appointment. With the exception of the housing and redevelopment authority, all appointments shall be by majority vote of the city council. Once appointed, an applicant shall serve until removed, with or without cause, by a four-fifths vote of the city council, until the expiration of the term of appointment and following appointment of the applicant's successor. Vacancies during a term shall be filled for the unexpired portion of the term. Sec. 2-46.01. - Same—Generally. The council determines the duties and exercises the powers of administrative boards or commissions. However, the council may establish boards or commissions as set forth in this article to investigate subjects or to perform quasi-judicial functions. Additional administrative boards or commissions shall be established as required by law or for the administration of a municipal function jointly shared with another political subdivision. (Ord. No. 363, § 4, 1-12-04) Sec. 2-46.03. - Planning commission. (a) Commission established. The planning commission is established pursuant to the Minnesota Municipal Planning Act, and has the powers and duties assigned to it by that Act, by this Code, and state law. The planning commission is hereby designated the planning agency of the city pursuant to the Municipal Planning Act. (b) Membership. The planning commission consists of seven members appointed in the manner set forth in this subsection. Members of the commission are appointed by the council for staggered terms of three years, expiring on March 31 of each year. (c) Officers; meetings. The chairperson and vice chairperson of the planning commission are appointed by the commission from among its membership for the term of one year. The commission shall adopt its own bylaws with the approval of the city council. All members of the commission may vote on all questions before the commission. No member of the commission may vote on any question in which the member has fiduciary interest, either directly or indirectly. The commission shall determine in its bylaws the date and time of its meetings and shall set such public hearings as are necessary and desirable, or as required by law or this Code. Page 2 (d) Powers and duties. The planning commission shall have the powers and duties allowed under state law, including: (1) To prepare a comprehensive plan for the future development of the city that is submitted to the council for implementation and to recommend amendments of the plan to the council from time to time as may be necessary or desirable. (2) To initiate, direct, and review, from time to time, a study of the provisions of the zoning code and the subdivision regulations and to report to the council its advice and recommendations with respect thereto. (3) To study applications and proposals for amendments to the zoning code and applications for special permits and to advise the council of its recommendations thereon. (4) To study preliminary plats and to advise the council of its recommendations thereof. (5) To act in an advisory capacity to the council in all matters wherein powers are assigned to the council by state law concerning comprehensive planning, zoning, platting, changes in streets, and other matters of a general planning nature. (e) Reports. The commission shall make an annual written report to the council, not later than March 31 of each calendar year, containing the commission's recommendations for the ensuing year. (Ord. No. 363, § 5, 1-12-04) Sec. 2-46.05. - Park and recreation commission. (a) Creation. There is established a park and recreation commission for the city. (b) Membership. The park and recreation commission consists of seven members appointed in the manner set forth in this subsection. Members of the commission are appointed by the council for staggered terms of three years expiring on March 31 of each year. Additionally, the commission may also have one or two youth representatives who shall also be voting members. Youth representatives shall be appointed for one-year terms. (c) Officers; meetings. The chairperson and vice chairperson of the park and recreation commission are appointed by the commission from among its membership for the term of one year. The commission shall adopt its own bylaws with the approval of the city council. All members of the commission may vote on all questions before the commission. No member of the commission may vote on any question in which the member has fiduciary interest, either directly or indirectly. The commission shall determine in its bylaws the date and time of its meetings and shall set such public hearings as are necessary and desirable or as required by law or this Code. (d) Powers and duties. The park and recreation commission shall have the following powers and duties: (1) To hold meetings of its members, to consider such matters pertaining to parks and public recreation programs in the city as shall be referred to the commission by the council, or as the members of the commission themselves deem proper. (2) To prepare a comprehensive plan for the future development of the city park and recreation system, to be submitted to the city council for implementation, and to maintain said plan, and recommend amendments of the plan to the city council, as may become necessary or desirable. (3) To act in an advisory capacity to the council in all matters relating to park and recreation in the city. (e) Reports. The commission shall make an annual written report to the council, not later than March 31 of each calendar year, containing the commission's recommendations for the ensuing year. (Ord. No. 363, § 6, 1-12-04; Ord. No. 582, § 1, 4-22-13) Page 3 Sec. 2-46.07. - Board of adjustments and appeals. Pursuant to M.S. § 462.354, a board of adjustments and appeals is hereby established. The planning commission shall serve as the board of adjustments and appeals. (Ord. No. 363, § 7, 1-12-04) Sec. 2-46.09. - Environmental commission. (a) Commission established. The environmental commission is established to provide the residents of Chanhassen with opportunities to improve the quality of their environment, address issues that affect the city's natural resources, provide environmental education to the public, bring a comprehensive perspective to environmental issues, and advocate the benefits and necessity of Chanhassen's natural resources. (b) Membership. The environmental commission consists of seven members appointed in the manner set forth in this subsection. Members of the commission are appointed by the council for staggered terms of three years expiring on March 31 of each year. (c) Officers; meetings. The chairperson and vice chairperson of the environmental commission are appointed by the commission from among its membership for the term of one year. The commission shall adopt its own bylaws with the approval of the city council. All members of the commission may vote on all questions before the commission. No member of the commission may vote on any question in which the member has fiduciary interest, either directly or indirectly. The commission shall determine in its bylaws the date and time of its meetings and shall set such public hearings as are necessary and desirable or as required by law or this Code. (d) Powers and duties. The environmental commission has the following powers and duties: (1) The environmental commission shall serve as an advisory body to the city council and planning commission in addressing the needs of the environment as directed by the city council. All final decisions are to be made by the city council. (2) The environmental commission will consider and make recommendations at the direction of the city council regarding environmental issues. (3) The environmental commission will make recommendations at the direction of the city council regarding funding for environmental projects. (4) The environmental commission may propose studies to the city council and make recommendations according to the results. (5) The environmental commission will coordinate services with other governmental and private agencies for related issues. (e) Reports. The environmental commission shall make an annual written report to the council, not later than March 31 of each calendar year, containing the commission's recommendations for the ensuing year. (Ord. No. 363, § 8, 1-12-04) Sec. 2-46.11. - Senior commission. (a) Commission established. The senior commission serves as an advisory body to the city council in addressing the special needs of people over age 55 living in Chanhassen. They consider and make recommendations to the city council regarding the special needs of seniors in the areas of transportation, information and assistance, independent living in the home, social and recreational Page 4 programs, senior center and senior housing, but are not limited to these issues. All final decisions are made by the city council. (b) Membership. The senior commission consists of seven or eight members appointed in the manner set forth in this subsection. Members of the commission are appointed by the council for staggered terms of three years, expiring on March 31 of each year. (c) Officers; meetings. The chairperson and vice chairperson of the senior commission are appointed by the commission from among its membership for the term of one year. The commission shall adopt its own bylaws with the approval of the city council. All members of the commission may vote on all questions before the commission. No member of the commission may vote on any question in which the member has fiduciary interest, either directly or indirectly. The commission shall determine in its bylaws the date and time of its meetings and shall set such public hearings as are necessary and desirable or as required by law or this Code. (d) Powers and duties. The senior commission shall have the following powers and duties: (1) They make recommendations to the city council regarding funding for special services to be provided for citizens over age 55. (2) They may propose needs studies for this age group where necessary and make recommendations to the city council based on the results. (3) They coordinate services with other governments and private agencies for this age group. (e) Reports. The commission shall make an annual written report to the council, not later than the last day of March of each calendar year, containing the comm ission's recommendations for the ensuing year. (Ord. No. 363, § 9, 1-12-04; Ord. No. 581, § 1, 4-8-13) Sec. 2-46.15. - Resignations and removal from commissions. Commissioners may resign voluntarily or may be removed from office by a majority vote of the city council. Vacancies on any advisory board or commission shall be filled by appointment with a majority vote of the city council. Vacancies shall be announced in the city's official newspaper and posted within city hall. Applications shall be available at the city clerk's office and shall be forwarded to the city council within the time prescribed. (Ord. No. 363, § 10, 1-12-04) Sec. 2-46.17. - Compensation. Commissioners shall serve without compensation. (Ord. No. 363, § 11, 1-12-04) Secs. 2-47—2-55. - Reserved. City of Chanhassen 2021 City Commission Interview Schedule February 22, 2021 First Choice Second Choice 4:30 Chaeyun Lee Park & Rec Youth NA 4:45 Kristin Fulkerson Environmental NA 5:00 Martina Alden Planning Environmental 5:15 Ryan Soller Planning Park & Rec 5:30 Jackelyn Vilijaste Park & Rec Planning 5:45 Greg Hawks Environmental NA 6:00 Kelsey Alto Planning Environmental 6:15 Heather Markert Park & Rec NA 6:30 Stephen Kelzer Planning Park & Rec 6:45 Scot Lacek Planning Environmental March 8, 2021 First Choice Second Choice 4:30 Dorina Tipton Senior NA 4:45 Scott Fischer Park & Rec Environmental 5:00 Jim Boettcher Park & Rec NA 5:15 Susan Kibler Senior Park & Rec 5:30 Erik Johnson Park & Rec Planning 5:45 Don Vasatka Park & Rec NA 6:00 Ross Reeves Park & Rec Environmental 6:15 Bala Chintaginjala Planning NA 6:30 Jessie Bent Park & Rec NA 6:45 Wilma Ruppert Planning Park & Rec First Choice Second Choice 5:00 Leslie Elhadi Environmental NA 5:15 Jim Camarata Senior NA Incumbent All commission appointments will take place at the March 22, 2021 City Council Meeting FIRST MEETINGS IN APRIL: Planning Commission - April 6, 2021 Environmental Commission - April 14, 2021 Senior Commission - April 16, 2021 Park & Rec Commission - April 27, 2021 City Council Interviews March 22, 2021 INTERVIEW SCORING SHEET February 22, 2021 5=High/1=Low Name Years Lived in Chanhassen Knowledge of Community Commitment to Position Knowledge of Major Issues Involvement in Community Total Points Chaeyun Lee Park & Rec Youth Kristin Fulkerson Environmental Martina Alden Planning/Environmental Ryan Soller Planning/Park & Rec Jackelyn Vilijaste Park & Rec/Planning Greg Hawks Environmental Kelsey Alto Planning/Environmental Heather Markert Park & Rec Name Years Lived in Chanhassen Knowledge of Community Commitment to Position Knowledge of Major Issues Involvement in Community Total Points Stephen Kelzer Planning/Park & Rec Scot Lacek Planning/Environmental COMMISSIONER INTERVIEW QUESTIONNAIRE Name: Commission Desired: Alternate: 1. What special qualities do you bring to the Commission? 2. What are your reasons for applying to the Commission? 3. What are the biggest problems you foresee facing Chanhassen in the future? 4. What do you believe are the community’s greatest assets? 5. What planning issues are you particularly concerned about? 6. What do you believe are the biggest concerns of your neighbors? 7. What do you believe the Commission does? 8. Are you involved with any other community organizations? 9. Do you understand the time commitments it takes to be a member of the Commission, and are you comfortable with that? Specific qualifications for this position* Yes No Are you currently serving on other Boards, Commissions, or Committees?* If yes, please list Yes No Have you served on a Board, Commission, or Committee in the past?* If yes, please list Please list organization memberships and positions held* Please list areas of special interest* Chanhassen Connection Newsletter City Website Facebook Twitter Chanhassen Villager Other How did you hear about commission vacancies?* Select all that apply As an immigrant from South Korea, I have analyzed the biggest different of leisure places/parks of South Korea and the US. Starting with parks, I believe South Korea has better systems for exercising tools supplied by parks. I could also provide pictures for better reference in the future, but most parks in South Korea provide simple workout equipment along walking trails so people could freely use them and have fun. Adding these advantageous components of Korean leisure facilities will help bringing new ideas in the park and rec commission; I can bring that perspective. My experiences from earth club or various service activities will allow me to contribute in discussions of how to benefit or support our community. Girls Inc Council of Advocacy and Change (YMCA) Ambassador and Representative Health care; supporting homeless, LGBTQ+ community, racial minorities, etc.; international policies or economics; creative arts; video editing Yes No Are you currently serving on other Boards, Commissions, or Committees?* If yes, please list Yes No Have you served on a Board, Commission, or Committee in the past?* If yes, please list Please list organization memberships and positions held* Please list areas of special interest* Chanhassen Connection Newsletter City Website Facebook Twitter Chanhassen Villager Other How did you hear about commission vacancies?* Select all that apply Environmental Commission City of Chanhassen Environmental Commission — 2018 – present Member (2018- present), Chair (2019 - present) Lake Fellowship of Unitarian Universalists - 2018 - present Board Vice-Chair (2018 - present) Girl Scouts USA —2015 – present Troop Leader, Service Unit Treasurer (2016 - 2017; 2020 - present), Service Unit Manager (2017- 2020). Recycling education, stormwater runoff management Kristin Fulkerson Excelsior, MN 55331 EXPERIENCE Legislative Aide to Delegate Al Carr, Maryland General Assembly, Annapolis, MD — 2008–2012 Gathered testimony and witnesses for bill hearings; tracked bills; collaborated with legislators, local government ofﬁcials, and environmental groups and activists; handled constituent correspondence; attended brieﬁngs; drafted press releases; kept the ofﬁce schedule; acted as Assistant to the Chair of the Green Caucus which included scheduling Caucus meetings, working with environmental advocacy groups, and tracking environmental legislation. Teacher, Baltimore County Schools, Towson, MD — 2002–2004 Taught Latin for Academic Success to 7th and 8th graders; revised curriculum for Latin for Academic Success. Teacher, Worthington City Schools, Worthington, OH — 2000–2001 Taught Latin I and Latin II to all high school grade levels. INTERNSHIPS Delegate Karen Montgomery, Maryland General Assembly, Annapolis, MD — 2008 Helped with constituent correspondence; tracked bills. VOLUNTEER ACTIVITIES City of Chanhassen Environmental Commission — 2018 – present Member Girl Scouts USA —2015 – present Troop Leader, Service Unit Treasurer (2016 - 2017; 2020 - present), Service Unit Manager (2017- 2020). EDUCATION Community College of Baltimore County, Dundalk, MD Paralegal Certiﬁcate, 2008 The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH M.Ed. in Foreign and Second Language Education, 2002 The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH M.A. in Greek and Latin , 2000 Louisiana Scholars’ College at Northwestern State University of Louisiana, Natchitoches, LA B.A. in Liberal Arts with concentration in Humanities and Social Thought, 1998 SKILLS Proﬁcient in Pages, Word, Numbers, Excel, Google Docs, Google Sheets, and Prezi. If yes, please list Please list organization memberships and positions held* Please list areas of special interest* Chanhassen Connection Newsletter City Website Facebook Twitter Chanhassen Villager Other How did you hear about commission vacancies?* Select all that apply volunteer to deliver meals in Chanhassen - meals on wheels volunteer to do low and moderate-income tax preparation through Prepare and prosper Want to learn and keep Chanhassen a great place to live. Specific qualifications for this position* Yes No Are you currently serving on other Boards, Commissions, or Committees?* If yes, please list Yes No Have you served on a Board, Commission, or Committee in the past?* If yes, please list Please list organization memberships and positions held* Please list areas of special interest* Strategic Planning Researcher Team player and collaborator Data Mining and Analytics Communication, Persuasion and Negotiation Committed, dependable and strong with follow-through. Willing to engage and liaise with the community Focused on delivering outcomes. I lived in a graduate student cooperative for five years while my wife was completing her doctorate at the University of MN with a population of 500 families. Here I served on the conciliation committee (addressing resident disputes) the finance committee and the board of directors. n/a I am interested in working on projects with a long term impact I am interested in getting into detailed projects with zoning and development to learn more about how these processes work and contribute to our success Above all I'm interested in serving Chanhassen in the area best suited Chanhassen Connection Newsletter City Website Facebook Twitter Chanhassen Villager Other How did you hear about commission vacancies?* Select all that apply Ryan Soller Strategic and innovative professional, passionate about the development and proliferation of new technology to improve people’s lives. E M P L O Y M E N T 08.2020-Present ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT LEAD – MatrixCare by ResMed + Led a team of account managers owning 1,000+ clients and over $60M in annual revenue + New product launch and commercialization leadership 06.2017– 08.2020 ENTERPRISE ACCOUNT EXECUTIVE – MatrixCare + Number one sales achiever in the company (2019) + President’s Club (2018, 2019) + Ownership of the company’s top, strategic accounts + Brought siloed teams together through new collaboration meetings + Mentored two new reps, both achieving president’s club their first full year + Led efforts for MatrixCare Gives, our charitable program for our clients 06.2015 – 06.2017 ACCOUNT MANAGER – MatrixCare + Consistent top-five performer, winning successive President’s Club awards + Owned a migration program for legacy software, growing revenue 600%+ + Brought a heart for continuous improvement to rigid, low-value processes 02.2014 – 05.2015 ACCOUNT SPECIALIST , CUSTOMER SUCCESS – MatrixCare + Owned accounts worth 18% of company revenue + Retained over 99% of total recurring (SaaS) revenue annually + Led client events with up to 60 in attendance in 12 national locations + Optimized events to grow revenue and pioneered a client-hosted model to eliminate rental expenses, thereby driving profitability for the business. + Facilitated a project that saw 275 employees spend a day in the life of a local customer, promoting new relationships and a client-centric culture. 08.2012 - 02.2014 FINANCIAL SOFTWARE ANALYST – MatrixCare + Dedicated analyst for top-tier, national accounts + Designed and presented webinars attended by 40+ clients each + Strong understanding of revenue cycle management and EHR + Mentored new team members. S K I L L S Leadership Strategic Account Planning Customer Success Mapping Digital Marketing Cross -Functional Collaboration Presentation s Communication Negotiation Continuous I mprovement Event Planning CRM, Business Automation Analyti c s and Data Sales Execution , Closing Deals Business Development Strategic Alliances , Partnerships Healthcare Industr y E D U C A T I O N M ASTER OF B USINESS ADMINISTRATION – UMN, Carlson School of Management Strategic Management specialization Medical Industry Leadership Institute (MILI) Affiliate Medical Industry Valuation Lab As a consultant team, produced market evaluation, product launch plan, financial analysis, and business recommendations for three local business ventures. New Product Design, Business Development - Medtronic BACHEL OR OF ARTS – Bethel University Summa Cum Laude V O L U N T E E R Como Student Community Cooperative , Minneapolis + Board of Directors + Finance Committee + Conciliation Committee Ramsey County Historical Society , St. Paul + Curatorial Intern St. Hubert’s Catholic Church , Chanhassen + Youth Ministry St. John the Baptist Catholic Church , New Bri ghton + Youth Ministry Our Lady of the Prairie Catholic Church , Belle Plaine + Youth Ministry Belle Plaine Schools + MSHSL Speech Coach Yes No Are you currently serving on other Boards, Commissions, or Committees?* If yes, please list Yes No Have you served on a Board, Commission, or Committee in the past?* If yes, please list Please list organization memberships and positions held* Please list areas of special interest* Chanhassen Connection Newsletter City Website Facebook Twitter Chanhassen Villager Other How did you hear about commission vacancies?* Select all that apply I have been a part of a local sales mentorship committee for college graduates in the past. I stepped away when we started having children due to the time commitment. Now that my children are no longer tiny babies, I feel I have more bandwidth. St. Catherine University, Sales Leadership Mentor Children's recreational activities and access for all ages from birth to teen. JACKELYN R. VILJASTE ▪ Chanhassen, MN 55317 ▪ SUMMARY Self-directed SaaS sales professional with over twelve years of successful sales experience both as an individual contributor and sales leader. Demonstrates consistent proﬁciency in building meaningful client advisory relationships, top sales performance, executive presence, revenue generation and client satisfaction. EXPERIENCE Vertex Software (Remote - Minneapolis, Minnesota) February 2019 - October 2019 Regional Account Manager - Upper Midwest •IA based start-up, specializing in the 3D visualization space; designed to improve collaboration across the product development lifecycle for large, complex, midwestern based OEMs. •Hired to manage overall sales process (third sales hire; pre-launch of product * mid-April 19’). Responsible for initial discovery through negotiation, including demonstration. •Primary focus was on engineering professionals and large heavy machinery manufacturers and their supply chain. •Proactively created discovery criteria for identiﬁcation of target accounts, re-conﬁgured product demonstration to better hone in on process efﬁciency and gaps in tools available to date. •Single handedly worked to represent sales team with marketing to recreate a more valuable sales presentation utilizing both challenger sales methodology and value selling. •Learned entirely new and complex market; quickly identiﬁed challenges and connected these challenges to larger more strategic business outcomes. •Lead the team in product demonstrations and all prospecting metrics. •Built relationships within several large and well respected, major heavy machinery OEMs. Leveraging these relationships I was able to gather direct and honest product feedback for both product and marketing teams internally to help move our platform in a more valuable direction. WORKIVA (Remote - Minneapolis, Minnesota) January 2015 - February 2019 Strategic Sales Director – Strategic Accounts (Great Lakes) January 2018 - February 2019 Strategic Sales Director – Strategic Accounts (West Coast) January 2017 - January 2018 •Manage Fortune 500 and Large Complex Accounts (Current & Prospect), selling ‘Last Mile of Reporting’ automation through the use of Wdesk (SaaS). Manage sales process from discovery call through ﬁnal agreement negotiation utilizing Command of The Sale and Command of the Message sales and qualiﬁcation model. •Identify and solve reporting challenges within the ofﬁce of the CFO/CAE, departments to include: external ﬁnancial reporting, corporate ﬁnance, actuary, FP&A, accounting, risk, compliance, SOX, internal audit, Tax and any other areas with complex reporting and collaboration requirements. •Lead whiteboard process audit discussions supported by industry and market research to identify key challenges and associated risks to the ﬁnancial organization. Highlight corresponding business outcomes (identiﬁed metrics for success) that come from mitigating said challenges to build value and need for Wdesk. •Partner with dedicated internal resource to maintain a high level of sales activity that translates to pipeline generation and closed business. •Strategic Great Lakes Top Rep Q2 (*Maternity Leave Q1). Regional Sales Director – Risk, Audit, Controls Management January 2015 - December 2017 •Manage a seven state (Midwest) territory selling ﬁnancial compliance and reporting software (SaaS) (emerging market Q1 2015) to selected list (Prospect Only Accounts) of Fortune 100, 500 and 1000 organizations as well as large private organizations. •Manage sales process from discovery call through ﬁnal agreement negotiation utilizing the challenger sales model. •Identify improvement and automation areas within the risk, compliance, SOX, internal audit, and internal controls departments to expand value within organization. •Lead process mapping with industry and market research to identify key challenges and associated risks to the ﬁnancial organization. Highlight corresponding business outcomes that come from mitigating said challenges to build value and need for our application. •Multiple Quarter Sales Gold Coin Recipient (over 100% quota) 15’, 16’ (*Maternity Leave Q2 ’16), 2017 Top 2 RACM Rep MINNESOTA OFFICE TECHNOLOGY GROUP (A Xerox Company) July 2012 - December 2014 Sales Director (Minnetonka, Minnesota) •Manage and train the sales team (within geographic territories) for ofﬁce technology ﬁrm new to the Minneapolis 7-county market. •Recruited, hired, and managed 8-11 person team selling IT consulting solutions, managed print services, and imaging technology to small, mid-sized, and major account organizations within markets with no current presence. •Developed pricing schedules to maximize organizational proﬁtability while maintaining competitive market pricing. •Managed an annual sales quota of approximately $3M in net revenue across 8 sales representatives. •Solely planned and executed Xerox Branded New-Hire Training for entire sales organization. •Trained and developed two of the ﬁrst MOTG Solutions Executives from new hire to President Club Performers in 2013. •Co-lead the sales organization with the Vice President of Sales for an overall growth of 24% from 12/2012 to 12/2013. Sales Director of the Quarter Q3, Q4 2013, Q1, Q2, Q3 2014 (MN & IL). TELEFLEX MEDICAL – ARROW INTERNATIONAL (Medical Device) October 2011 - July 2012 Anesthesia & Respiratory Sales Specialist (Remote - Minneapolis, Minnesota) •Marketed and sold anesthesia and respiratory to hospitals and ambulatory surgical centers within the Midwestern geographical region. •Achieved 112% of anesthesia business quota and 107% of anesthesia and respiratory business quota. •Held #1 anesthesia growth territory in US for entire tenure with company. •Maintained extremely competitive client base of approximately 150 current accounts while aggressively pursuing new business. LOFFLER COMPANIES, INC. December 2008 - October 2011 Strategic Account Executive (Bloomington, Minnesota) •Sold imaging technology, managed print services, IT managed services, people-based services and software solutions to executives and key accounts in manufacturing, legal, non-proﬁt, and medical. •Utilized consultative sales and differentiation to develop recommendations and timelines, negotiate sales, and exceed sales goals. •Identiﬁed improvement areas within accounts and implemented solutions often resulting in lowered costs, improved efﬁciency and productivity. •Consistent monthly and quarterly top sales performer. President’s Club: 2010, achieved qualiﬁer for 2011 before leaving in October. Sales Representative of the Year Award: 2008 (ranked 1 of 36). Over 70% net new business. Territory Sales Representative June 2007 - December 2008 •Managed sales process to general business executives within a deﬁned geographical territory. •Appointed as lead team trainer to enhance new-hire training effectiveness and consistency. •Consistent monthly and quarterly top sales performer. •President’s Club: 2008 • Achieved 253% of sales quota in 1st year.Over 80% net new business. EDUCATION •WINONA STATE UNIVERSITY (Winona, Minnesota) •Bachelor of Arts: Psychology December 2006 | Dean’s List Specific qualifications for this position* Yes No Are you currently serving on other Boards, Commissions, or Committees?* If yes, please list Yes No Have you served on a Board, Commission, or Committee in the past?* If yes, please list Please list organization memberships and positions held* Please list areas of special interest* I have a good understanding of technical systems. The variables that affect our creeks, lakes, retention ponds, detention ponds, catch basins and hard surface water runoff are related by cause and effect. They must be planned, prepared and monitored. Potable water (wells), storm water and sanitary sewer routing are all related and ultimately related to our lakes and creeks. None of our water resources are infinite. I want to educate our citizens to these facts and convince them to conserve and not waste our water resources. There are supply and financial consequences. Recycling has become an avid interest to me since joining the Environmental Commission. I have learned a lot about what and how to recycle and the consequences for ignoring, not reducing volume or improperly disposing of recycle material. I want to pass this information on to our citizens so they can make knowledgeable and responsible decisions I have been the chairman of my high school reunion committee for the last 7 years. I also, maintain the class website and library. Golden Valley JayCee's Church building committee National Association of Purchasing Managers Condominium association - Briarwood NAPM- member Family Genealogy U.S. history musical instruments reading/books Chanhassen Connection Newsletter City Website Facebook Twitter Chanhassen Villager Other How did you hear about commission vacancies?* Select all that apply Gregory A. Hawks 1FEB, 2018 Chanhassen, Mn 55317 SUMMARY Supply Chain Management professional with a degree in Mechanical Engineering and deep expertise in the entire purchasing process. Expertise includes: • Use techniques of value engineering, geometric tolerancing, SPC, supply chain management and negotiation to present a viable and documented cost for submission with a proposal. • Developing clear, concise and economical print changes to net the best value for the bill of material. • Working with the bill of material of a company’s new product/potential contract, the supporting engineering prints and identifying the most economical manufacturing processes, specific costs and potential suppliers. • Partnering with Engineering and Quality to define parts, materials and processes that best meet the needs of a project (focused on best value, most economical and functional). • Identifying, evaluating and select vendors to produce mechanical processed parts (machining, casting, forging, plastic injection molding, stamping, welding, etc.). • Defined, procured and qualified bulk explosive and explosive assemblies for production. • Negotiate with vendors regarding terms and conditions, delivery, processes, tolerances, etc. • Working well with diverse stakeholders to gather input and secure buy in. EXPERIENCE ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS(former HONEYWELL DEFENSE), Mpls., MN 1980-2013 Engineering contract consultant (2011-2018) Worked value engineering projects to reduce individual piece part costs to meet total program cost target Sr. Subcontract Manager (2007-2011) Worked on 18-20 U.S. Defense programs simultaneously managing large dollar subcontracts. Worked with the program engineers to identify print, process and supplier to meet the technical requirements. Negotiated fixed price subcontract, managed schedule for tooling and deliverable product, verified quality acceptance and performed all close out transactions. Negotiated technical changes with subcontractors as the product was constantly redesigned, securing high value and maintaining relationships with vendors. Corporate Supply Chain Manager (1999-2007) Lead group of 7 locations in an effort to reduce number of suppliers, reduce cost and significantly improve supplier quality and delivery ratings for energetic products. Reduced the number of suppliers from 108 to 34. New system raised quality rating from 81-99%; raised on time delivery from 64-97.6%, and reduced price. Lead Mechanical Buyer (1991-1999) Found and identified best valued suppliers for forgings, castings, plastic injection and complex machine parts for Government military contracts. Evaluated BOM and found best vendors, secured competitive bids, managed competitive bidding process. After awarded projects, managed purchase of parts, established schedule, price, process for production, inspection data and certification. Gregory A. Hawks, page 2 Supervisor of Mechanical buying group (1984-1991) Led 19 person group in buying all mechanical products for the biggest project ATK had at the time, encompassing 1800 parts and up to 20 million of each part produced.. Material budget was $120- $140M/year. Sr. Procurement Engineer (1980-1984) Worked with engineering to identify, test, and source products to print in preparation to solicit bids for Government contracts. ADDITIONAL EXPERIENCE TENNANT CO., Golden Valley, MN (1974-1980) Purchasing Engineer Worked with engineering to qualify designs, verify that product was called out properly and available in industry prior to production. FOOD ENGINEERING CORP., Plymouth, MN (1972-1974) Product Engineer-prepare prints for production & supervise assembly of large food dryers. PILLSBURY CORP.-Mpls., MN (1970-1972) Engineering Intern Designed production facility process lines, drew facility plans and layout blueprints for existing and future production facilities. EDUCATION BSME; University of Minnesota Institute of Technology, Minneapolis MN CPM (Certified Purchasing Manager); NAPM Certified-Machine Shop Principles – Dunwoody Institute Certified: Welding – MIG, TIG, stick and gas; North Hennepin Tech Certified: Pneumatic/hydraulic schematic design; A.H. Systems Active U.S. Government “Secret Clearance” Professional Development classes: more than 150 classes in subjects like geometric tolerancing, negotiation, SPC, 6 Sigma (full list available upon request). If yes, please list Yes No Have you served on a Board, Commission, or Committee in the past?* If yes, please list Please list organization memberships and positions held* Please list areas of special interest* Chanhassen Connection Newsletter City Website Facebook Twitter Chanhassen Villager Other How did you hear about commission vacancies?* Select all that apply I serve on the events and volunteer committee for the nonprofit Still Kickin None None Yes No Have you served on a Board, Commission, or Committee in the past?* If yes, please list Please list organization memberships and positions held* Please list areas of special interest* Chanhassen Connection Newsletter City Website Facebook Twitter Chanhassen Villager Other How did you hear about commission vacancies?* Select all that apply My committee involvement was during my time working at Minnetonka High School. I was the department chair for many years. I was on the grading committee for multiple years and enjoyed that as well. For my last two years, I was asked to be the teacher liaison for the crisis committee. No recent organizational memberships. I am especially interested in accessibility to the parks for bikers and walkers. Heather Markert Chanhassen, MN 55317  Objective Accomplished teacher and professor with over 15 years experience looking to leverage expertise in organization, planning, efficiency and communication into an executive assistant position. Experience Senior Consultant, Apriton Educational Advisors Organized site visits for 100+ educators at local companies such as General Mills, Best Buy and United Health Group. Collaborated with the companies to create meaningful tours and experiences for each educator followed by hosting debriefing events. Lecturer and Online Professor, North Dakota State University 2016-2018 My duties included teaching the online course, Philosophy & Policy of Career & Technical Education. This requires organization and communication through multiple types of technology. In addition, I supervised student teachers in the Minneapolis/St. Paul metro area. This included observations, evaluations and coordinating between the university, student teacher and cooperating teacher. Family & Consumer Science Teacher, Minnetonka High School 2008-2017 •District and Building Department Chair (2013 to 2016) •Cooperating teacher for two student teachers from NDSU (2013 & 2015) •Assessment Committee (2012 to present) •Mentor teacher for new employees (2013) •Crisis Committee (2014 to present) •First Mates (2011 to 2013) In addition to the above positions held while at Minnetonka, I participated in numerous other events. A few highlights include creating top placing ideas in the annual Innovation Hunt and partaking as a host classroom at the annual district technology showcase. Family & Consumer Science Teacher, Various Schools 2006-2008 Education Saint Mary’s University – M.A. in Education (Magna cum laude) 2008-2009 North Dakota State University – B. S. Family & Consumer Science Education 2002-2006 Yes No Have you served on a Board, Commission, or Committee in the past?* If yes, please list Please list organization memberships and positions held* Please list areas of special interest* Chanhassen Connection Newsletter City Website Facebook Twitter Chanhassen Villager Other How did you hear about commission vacancies?* Select all that apply None I don't know that I have any specific interests motivating me to apply for this position other than trying to find a way to be more involved in the community. Stephen Kelzer Chanhassen, MN Summary I am a full-stack software engineer with 7+ years of professional experience building web and mobile applications with clean code in agile environments. I’ve built countless web applications of many types, created continuous integration and deployment pipelines, and written thousands of unit and integration tests. I’m a lifelong learner, passionately curious, and I truly enjoy working in a team environment. Experience Software Engineer TeamGenius Aug 2019 - Present (1 year 6 months +) Working on an agile small team in a startup environment, being flexible is priority number one! Most of my time is spent on our web application, however I am involved in the mobile app development from time to time. I participate during architectural and planning meetings while working also independently after the projects have been defined. Over a year ago we started transitioning front-end pages over to react; this process has primarily been led and maintained by me. I very much enjoy the team I work on and bringing advancements to our product for our customers! Current Tech Stack: .NET Framework, .NET Core, React, SQL, Azure, Azure Tables, Azure Blob Storage, Azure Functions, CSS, SCSS, DDD (Domain Driven Design), TDD (Test Driven Development), DevExpress, DevExtreme, Bootstrap, SendGrid, Xamarin Forms, SQLite, Syncfusion, WebApi, Azure Sync Table Senior Software Engineer Dow Jones Jun 2018 - Aug 2019 (1 year 3 months) Working mostly with .Net Core and Node, I assisted the MarketWatch.com team in building new features and expanding their websites reach. I have helped with products that span across other Dow Jones products as well (WSJ, Barrons, etc) utilizing many technologies. .NET Framework, .NET Core, AWS, Node, React, Vue Senior Software Engineer Pearson VUE Feb 2017 - Jun 2018 (1 year 5 months) Working on a small team tasked with overhauling a purchased software suite to a microservice architecture. I took on the role of leading our DevOps tasks utilizing TeamCity, uDeploy and Powershell. Frequently volunteering for the largest, most daunting tasks assigned to my team; I enjoyed a good challenge! I actively participated in code reviews for all of my peers and participated in meeting Stephen Kelzer - page 1 Specific qualifications for this position* Yes No Are you currently serving on other Boards, Commissions, or Committees?* If yes, please list Yes No Have you served on a Board, Commission, or Committee in the past?* If yes, please list Please list organization memberships and positions held* My background and interests would probably best be utilized on the Planning Commission, but I leave it to the City Council to best determine need areas vs. what I can contribute. Planning Commission I am currently involved as an active citizen in the Highway 5 Arboretum entrance project, having worked with Angie, city engineer, DOT rep, etc. My knowledge of the neighborhood, Industrial Engineering knowledge for process design and queueing theory, and community exposure through my position as the Vice President and Board member of the Lake Minnewashta Preservation Association has provided valuable input to the planning effort. I believe current neighborhood concerns to the potential safety and traffic issues can be overcome by addressing speed, Minnewashta Parkway access, and adding safety measures on Minnewashta. I have owned a condominium while living in California, built a home in Woodbury, Minnesota, lived in a home in Mendota Heights, and have a rental property in Mendota Heights and Mound, Minnesota, so bring a variety of experience with local ordinances, codes, state statutes, issue resolution, and perspective to the table. Environmental Commission As mentioned, I serve on the LMPA for the last 7 years. I've spearheaded efforts to obtain State grant money for Aquatic Invasive Species Education in the western suburbs and hired college interns to help in the efforts. I've worked with Chanhassen city representatives, County commissioners, DNR representatives, University of Minnesota Research Departments, Carver County Park management and employees on lake-related issues. I lead the efforts for annual aquatic weed treatment on the lake. I am also the grant writer for any State assistance available to help us fund the weed treatment or boat launch AIS inspectors. I stay current with all lake related issues, including attending the various sessions held by the DNR and County. LMPA LMPA - Vice President, Board member Minnesota Intellectual Property Law Association - member Please list areas of special interest* Chanhassen Connection Newsletter City Website Facebook Twitter Chanhassen Villager Other How did you hear about commission vacancies?* Select all that apply Highway 5/Arboretum entrance project Chanhassen lake health (e.g., AIS, water runoff, water quality, lake access, fertilizer/leaf minimization of phosphorus). SCOT ALLEN LACEK Greater Minneapolis-St. Paul Area SUMMARY  Sold over $20 MM in Business Analytics, ERP, and CRM solutions to customers while employed by Microsoft, IBM, CSC, Peoplesoft, Oracle, Deltek, Rolta, and Evosys.  Top performing sales representative at Microsoft, Oracle Corporation, and Evosys.  Experience spans start-up ventures to Fortune 500 Corporations. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE INOAPPS CONSULTING 2019 - 2020 Regional Sales Director  Leveraging working relationships with over 100 Oracle sales representatives, built pipeline and sold consulting and SaaS solutions from $0 to $12MM in 10 month period. Focus on Oracle’s Cloud EPM, HCM, and SCM product areas. EVOSYS GLOBAL CORPORATION 2016 – 2018 Regional Sales Director  Developed new Midwest territory from $0 to $1.5MM in sales in 8 months.  Top North America sales rep for 2017 and 2018 sales years.  Based on Midwest success, assigned to evangelize Mountain and West Coast territories.  Sold consulting and Oracle’s Cloud software applications with over 100 Oracle field sales representatives and management across the Business Analytic, ERP, HCM, SCM, CX pillars in over 170 prospect pursuits. ROLTA INTERNATIONAL, INC. 2014 - 2016 National Solutions Executive  Sold Oracle enterprise software consulting (Business Analytics, EBS, Cloud) to Fortune 50  Grew sales pipeline for enterprise solutions from $0 to $15 MM in 8-month period.  Quickly ramped up, closing first $250K deal in 3 weeks. DELTEK CORPORATION 2012 - 2014 Sales Director Sold ERP and BI solutions to project oriented businesses.  Sold over $5 MM in solutions, focusing on ERP and Business Analytic solutions.  Led the full sales engagement and territory management, from prospecting, sales strategy, ROI analysis, pricing, negotiations, cultivating additional sales, and contracts.  Customers included Qualcomm, American Native Corporations. ORACLE CORPORATION 1991 – 1996 & 2008 - 2010 Consulting Sales Manager Sold CRM, ERP, and Business Analytic consulting services to Fortune 500 companies.  Overachieved quota by 119% by selling $2.6 MM consulting (6 months)  Overachieved quota by 109% in year 2.  Sold to CPG companies, including Land O Lakes, Hormel, 3M, and Wells Dairy. Senior Sales Consultant – Distribution & Financial Software Applications  Delivered award-winning sales performance  Overachieved quota by 123% in 1994 and 142% in 1995. MICROSOFT CORPORATION 2005 - 2007 Business Analytics Sales Manager Sold $8.4 MM of products and solutions into the North Central District’s top 250 customers.  Overachieved quota by 105% (ranked first in country in growth and revenue).  Instituted several District best practices, including Sarbanes-Oxley Executive event. IBM CORPORATION 2003 - 2005 Senior Sales Manager - Business Intelligence Sold Business Intelligence offerings within State of Minnesota in quota-carrying role, including managing sales cycle for prospects in a team sale environment, and solution selling IBM hardware, software, and services. Concentration on Analytical CRM, OLAP, Balanced Scorecard, and Data Mining opportunities across multiple industries with Fortune 500 customers (e.g., Cargill, Wells Fargo, 3M, Target, Mayo Clinic, Best Buy, Fingerhut)  Sold over $7M in IBM BI solutions.  Drove multiple Analytical CRM initiatives with ‘C’ level executives across territory to sell IBM and partner (e.g., Siebel, Unica, Gentia, Brio, Business Objects, Retek) solutions.  Overachieved 2003 quota by 116% and 2004 quota by 140%. QUEST ONE DECISION SCIENCES Director – Sales In a start-up company environment, developed partnership with Manugistics, and solicited prospects for product and service offerings from trade conferences and cold call leads in a quota-carrying role.  Coordinated solution strategy with Product Management and Marketing, including use of web- enablement, collaboration, and analytical applications.  Evaluated use of analytical techniques, such as Real Options Valuation (ROV), EVA, and ABC, in business intelligence and B2B software products.  Customers included General Motors and many of its suppliers. PEOPLESOFT, INC. Manager – Consumer Packaged Goods Industry Marketing For a new corporate initiative, managed corporate and field product planning and marketing resources, driving vision through execution phases of industry software solution into marketplace.  Developed original industry solution templates with Industry Business Unit and worked with Product Marketing to release to field.  Led software and service partner (e.g., Big-5) alliance relationships.  Determined strategic use of Business Analytics CRM, OLAP, Internet, Supply Chain Planning, Promotional Planning, Manufacturing, and Front Office applications in industry solution.  Customers included Borden Foods, Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Qualcomm. Education M.B.A. – Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA ● B.S., Industrial Engineering – University of Illinois, Champaign, IL ● J.D., William Mitchell College of Law ● C.P.I.M.. ● Series 7 (expired) CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 22, 2021 Subject Approve City Council Minutes dated February 8, 2021 Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.1. Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, Office Manager File No: PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves the City Council minutes dated February 8, 2021.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. ATTACHMENTS: Work Session Summary Summary Minutes CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION SUMMARY MINUTES FEBRUARY 8, 2021 Mayor Ryan called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilwoman Rehm (Zoom), Councilman Campion, and Councilwoman Schubert MEMBERS ABSENT: None. STAFF PRESENT: Interim City Manager Heather Johnston CONSULTANT PRESENT: Lynn Barboza, Strategic Government Resources DISCUSSION ON CITY MANAGER SEARCH: Mayor Ryan and Council Member Schubert reported back on the additional due diligence that was done on the finalist candidate. Ms. Barboza asked the Council if they wanted to proceed with the finalist candidate or relaunch the search. Council consensus was to move forward with the finalist candidate. Council discussed what may be included in the employment contract and directed staff to enter into negotiations with Laurie Hokkanen for a contract as the Chanhassen City Manager. Council further discussed what they would be expecting of a new City Manager in the first year at the City. Council expressed support for a long-term financial plan that was aligned with the City’s long-term goals, including parks and equipment. Council consensus was for additional engagement with the community, both formally and informally. This may include “flash voting” or some other tool that would allow for brief surveys on timely topics. The new City Manager should continue to address issues raised in the Employee Survey, including improving internal communication and employee recognition. A communications plan for the Manager may include a regular update for the community of some form. The meeting adjourned at 6:51 pm. Submitted by Heather Johnston Interim City Manager Prepared by Kim Meuwissen CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 8, 2021 Mayor Ryan called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilman Campion, Councilwoman Rehm, Councilwoman Schubert, and Councilman McDonald Councilwoman Rehm joined via Zoom. STAFF PRESENT: Charlie Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer, Heather Johnston, Interim City Manager; and George Bender, Assistant City Engineer PUBLIC PRESENT: Bethany Tjornhom 1840 Freedom Lane Richard Berland (via Zoom) 6900 Minnewashta Parkway Lyndon Colebrook-Robjent Carver County Division Director/County Engineer Angie Stenson Carver County Senior Transportation Planner Diane Langenbach MnDOT Environmental Engineer/Project Manager Peter Moe Director of UofM Landscape Arboretum Eric Johnson Bolton & Menk Transportation Engineer Ross Tillman Bolton & Menk Principal Transportation Engineer Mayor Ryan asked the council if there were any modifications or additions to the agenda. After the roll call vote there were no changes to the published agenda. PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: MAPLE LEAF AWARD - BETHANY TJORNHOM Mayor Ryan thanked Ms. Tjornhom for her 16 years of service on the council. She read a statement and presented a plaque. The meeting was recessed for refreshments at 7:10 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 7:21 p.m. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the City Council approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the Interim City Manager’s recommendations: 1. Approve City Council Minutes dated January 25, 2021 City Council Minutes – February 8, 2021 2 2. Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated January 19, 2021 3. Receive Park & Recreation Commission Minutes dated October 27, 2020, November 24, 2020 and December 8, 2020 4. Resolution #2021-04: Bid Authorization for 2021 Street Improvement Project (20-05) 5. Resolution #2021-05: Accept a Donation from T-Mobile for 28th Annual February Festival 6. Approve the 2021/2022 Lake Ann Park Beach Lifeguard Contract 7. Resolution #2021-06: Adopt Resolution Setting a Public Hearing for March 22, 2021 Establishing a TIF District All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. Richard Berland wished to make a comment about the Arboretum Transportation Plan. Mayor Ryan explained the item was on the agenda and comments could be taken at that time. OLD BUSINESS: RESOLUTION #2021-07: APPROVE ARBORETUM AREA TRANSPORTATION PLAN Public Works Director/City Engineer Charlie Howley presented the item and introduced the other people who were working on the project. The Arboretum Area Transportation Plan (AATP) began in March 2019 and the group was asking for council support on the vision. Mr. Howley reviewed that council had asked the group to address three main areas: ● Hold a specific outreach event with residents of Minnewashta Parkway concerning moving the entrance to the Arboretum. ● Hold a specific outreach to Crimson Bay Road due to the roadway connection. This outreach was held in November. ● Because the city didn’t have an appetite to contribute funding to the 82nd Street plan, the council requested a reflection of $0 amount contributed. With help from legislative funding, the group has gotten to the point of $0 funding requested of the city. The group intends to continue to work to secure funding, work on the design phase, and involve the City Council in check-ins. Carver County Division Director/County Engineer Lyndon Colebrook-Robjent gave a history of the project. The intention was to improve traffic patterns, increase mobility, and improve safety. City Council Minutes – February 8, 2021 3 The County felt it was important to invest and identified 26 projects. They were able to receive public input. Bolton & Menk Transportation Engineer Eric Johnson presented the purpose of the study, implementation, next steps, review of the vision, recent engagement, and where to go from here. The purpose of the study was to perform an area wide transportation vision, to look for partners to approve the shared vision, to identify short-, mid-, and long-term implementation plans, to define the problems and opportunities, and to arrive at concepts that best meet the goals and objectives. This was accomplished through updates to the Council as well as public open houses and refining the vision. There will continue to be public engagement throughout the project. Mr. Johnson reviewed that the resolution was not a commitment by the Council to invest a certain amount of money at this time. The plan will be realized over the next 20 years and encompasses 20 projects totaling $206 million. The cost will be broken down into funding sources including competitive grants, MnDOT funding, County and local option sales tax, as well as local funds including about $1.2 million from Chanhassen. Mr. Johnson reviewed the short-term, mid-term, and long-term implementation. Mr. Johnson reviewed the open house for Crimson Bay Road which gathered public feedback. Public concerns at the open houses included increased traffic, compromised safety, narrow roads, and decreased property values. Residents requested signage on Crimson Bay Road to indicate it was not a through street. He outlined different solutions that might assist in traffic pattern concerns on this road. Mr. Johnson continued that next steps involved a city-led effort to further develop and evaluate the concepts and go for Local Partnership Program funding, with a tentative start date of 2024 construction. Mr. Johnson stated the Minnewashta Parkway open house raised similar concerns as well as additional concerns regarding the relocation of the entrance and Arboretum events which would increase traffic on that road. Current problems include high speeds and difficulty crossing the road to access local beaches. There were also concerns about decrease in property values. Engagement to date has only included 90 people of 550 affected households. Attendees offered solutions including adding a signal to Highway 5, limiting access so vehicles cannot go north and south, reducing the speed limit, increasing pedestrian crossings, as well as alternative ways to gain access to the Arboretum. Mr. Johnson gave a history of Minnewashta Parkway which currently sees just over 2,000 cars per day. Mr. Johnson gave a summary of data collected of traffic patterns entering and exiting the Arboretum during peak times in May and October of 2017 and 2018. City Council Minutes – February 8, 2021 4 Director of the University of Minnesota (U of M) Landscape Arboretum Peter Moe explained that the goal was for people from everywhere to have safe access to the Arboretum. There are 1,200 acres in the Arboretum and the visitor experience could be improved. The study has looked into alternative transportation types into the Arboretum including biking and walking and there is a new regional trail entirely on the U of M land. He showed a map outlining the main entrance at Minnewashta Parkway as well as an entrance near the Farm at the Arb which would be used for all events including children’s programming, the Arboretum plant sale, etc. The entrance near the farm could also be used on busy days. Once the Chinese Garden is completed, it will be a major site for weddings and rentals but that will be 15 or more years down the road. He reviewed that 82nd Street is a gravel road that could be improved. Roads that cut through the Arboretum are used for internal circulation but could never function for buses or garbage collection as they are narrow, icy, and winding with hills. Mr. Moe talked about the Arboretum’s new process of time ticketing which has helped improve spacing of visitors as well as parking. In the proposed plans, visitors would not stop at a gatehouse but would pay at the exit which should eliminate traffic backup on Highway 5. Increased communication and signage at the Arboretum and on Highway 5 would help people learn how to use the new exit. He also addressed that these plans have been used to help secure local funding. He has been meeting with donors to secure funds for road improvements. The plan is to have these changes completed by the time Highway 5 is done. Mr. Johnson reviewed that Carver County, City of Chanhassen, City of Victoria, the Arboretum, and MnDOT were partners on this project. He spoke about a study of Minnewashta Parkway, refining the Trunk Highway (TH) 5 design, working with the Arboretum on wayfinding, event management, and additional community engagement, including a noise analysis. Mr. Johnson asked the Council for their support, with the understanding that there would continue to be refinement of the implementation, so that the project can move forward and capture pending funding. Mayor Ryan addressed the emails and phone calls the Council has received concerning the project and wished to clarify some of the points. The Council was being asked for support on the vision of the comprehensive transportation plan. It was a significant financial investment with multiple partners. It was not a “vote no” issue and the Council was not approving or denying preliminary or final designs. Instead, it was approval of the vision plan and proposal. There will be many more opportunities to receive public engagement as the preliminary design phase is developed. If the city is not in alignment with county or state financial planning it would put them in a precarious position. The city has limited purview, including no zoning authority over the Arboretum, as well as entrances onto TH 5. The city has authority over local roads which includes Minnewashta Parkway and Crimson Bay Road. She appreciates the traffic mitigation plan and wayfinding signs including signage on Crimson Bay Road to deter cut-through traffic. Councilman McDonald thanked the Arboretum for putting together the pieces of the project since it is difficult to plan for all of it to happen simultaneously. He is also grateful for the internal structure that allows for a trail underpass at Highway 41. The city has also wanted to improve the intersection of Highway 5 and Minnewashta Parkway for many years. He agreed City Council Minutes – February 8, 2021 5 that the current traffic patterns create a choke point and it has become a high accident area. He feels the plan allows the city to address concerns and come up with solutions to make the area more usable. He would like to see something done on Minnewashta Parkway, particularly at Kings Road, to improve pedestrian crossing. He asked if there are other areas of the city that have beach access for the neighborhood that may be causing safety concerns. Should pedestrian crossings be added to those areas? He emphasized improving safety. Councilwoman Rehm agreed on a focus on traffic and pedestrian safety on Minnewashta Parkway. She is excited to see a bridge connecting the wetlands. She asked if there was a way to work with SouthWest Transit to create a shuttle bus during major events which may reduce traffic. Mr. Moe stated the Arboretum has worked with SouthWest Transit in the past and is willing to work with them to make the Arboretum more accessible. Councilman McDonald stated that he was part of the SouthWest Transit Commission and they are prohibited by law to act as a charter service due to funding they receive. It may be possible on a limited basis but not long term. Councilwoman Schubert asked if there was any concern about getting the $160 million in funding, including $80 million in grants and $80 million from the State. Mr. Colebrook-Robjent stated the grants are hopeful. He stated the County and Bolton & Menk are good at going after grants. The estimates are conservative and, if the money isn’t received, the County will bring in the sales tax to fill the gap. Currently, the County can afford to do the short- and mid-term projects. The County has done a cash flow analysis. Councilwoman Schubert asked if the Arboretum would continue to do time ticketing or if it would be phased out. Mr. Moe stated that the time ticketing had many advantages. However, since some senior citizens are having a harder time getting tickets, the Arboretum may look at a hybrid system. At this time, time ticketing would continue until spring but there is no final decision on if it will continue or not. Councilwoman Schubert agreed that the council will continue to look at Minnewashta Parkway to increase safety for residents. Councilman Campion is excited about the project and the fact the city will not be bearing an overly large financial burden. He agreed that traffic impacts on Minnewashta Parkway need to be taken into consideration. Mayor Ryan added that Crimson Bay Road feedback was also important. She felt that a communication plan should be discussed between the entities involved. Since only a small amount of Minnewashta Parkway households have given feedback, she would hope for additional engagement. Hopefully the funding will come through to support the project. City Council Minutes – February 8, 2021 6 Mayor Ryan stated that, although it was not a public hearing, she would allow public comment. Resident Richard Berland expressed that the Arboretum was an asset that he enjoys. He doesn’t feel that the entrance to the Arboretum should be put in the Minnewashta Parkway neighborhood. He had attended the open house meetings in 2020 but felt he just received information and didn’t have a chance to help make a decision. He hopes the council can find a different solution. Mr. Howley agreed that pedestrian safety and traffic speed is of concern and the corridor will be assessed for impacts. Mayor Ryan encouraged Mr. Berland to stay involved and agreed that a two-way exchange was desirable. Resolution #2021-07: Councilman Campion moved, Councilman McDonald seconded that the City Council approves the attached resolution to support the Arboretum Area Transportation Plan dated February, 2021. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. APPROVE LEGISLATIVE AGENDA Interim City Manager Heather Johnston reviewed the legislative agenda. Items for consideration included longstanding support of urban transit, new developments sharing in cost of business permit fees, unfunded mandates including regulations from the state on local government, local government restrictions such as levy limits imposed by the state, certain restrictions on zoning authorities, streamlining the wetland permitting process throughout all levels of government, support of steady NSA funding and identifying funding sources to cover local projects, water resource protection funding based on the number of lakes and wetlands in a community, the Minnetonka Middle School West Intersection improvements, and a desire to continue to be part of the tax base sharing program. Ms. Johnston answered a question that Councilman Campion had brought up at a previous meeting. The amount the City of Chanhassen shares in terms of net tax capacity is about $1 million which means the city has a net tax contribution of about $120,000. Ms. Johnston added that Chanhassen would support change to state statute that would allow for remote meetings outside of an emergency order - limitations may include the number of meetings or under limited circumstances. Council did not have any questions. Mayor Ryan asked that a sentence be added after the “limitations may include number of meetings annually or under limited circumstances such as work-related travel” which states “to City Council Minutes – February 8, 2021 7 be determined at the local level.” Ms. Johnston will share the finished document with Chanhassen’s legislative delegation. Mayor Ryan will be inviting the legislators to speak with the council as their schedules allow. Representative Boe came to the council earlier this year, but is planning on coming again. Visits from Representative Morrison, Senator Osmek, and Senator Coleman are also expected. Councilman McDonald, Councilwoman Schubert seconded that the City Council approve the 2021 Legislative Priorities. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. PUBLIC HEARING: APPROVE ON-SALE 3.2 PERCENT MALT LIQUOR LICENSE FOR GOLF ZONE LOCATED AT 825 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE Ms. Johnston presented the item and introduced business owners Brian and Keri Colvin who joined via Zoom. The license would be limited to inside only, a background check has been performed, and a notice has been sent to homeowners within 500 feet of the property. No comments have been received by neighbors concerning this license approval. Mayor Ryan opened the public hearing. There was no public comment. Mayor Ryan closed the public hearing. Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the City Council approve the request for an on-sale 3.2 percent malt liquor license from Colvin Golf LLC DBA Golf Zone located at 825 Flying Cloud Drive. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. NEW BUSINESS. None. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS. Mayor Ryan thanked Mr. Howley for allowing her to do a snowplow ride along. Mr. Howley gave an open invitation to other council members to also do a ride along. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. None. CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION. REVIEW OF CLAIMS PAID 02-08-2021 City Council Minutes – February 8, 2021 8 Councilwoman Schubert moved, Councilman Campion seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The City Council meeting was adjourned at 9:15 p.m. Submitted by Heather Johnston Interim City Manager Prepared by Kim Meuwissen CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 22, 2021 Subject Receive Environmental Commission Minutes dated January 13, 2021 Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.2. Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, Office Manager File No: PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council receives the Environmental Commission minutes dated January 13, 2021.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. ATTACHMENTS: Summary Minutes 1 Chanhassen Environmental Commission (EC) Regular Meeting – Zoom Online Meeting 6:00 pm January 13, 2021 Members Present: Bill Chappell, Kristin Fulkerson, Jeff Harken, Greg Hawks, Don Vasatka, and Markus Fischer. Members Absent: None Staff Present: Jill Sinclair, Environmental Resources Specialist Minutes: December minutes were approved. City updates: • Recycling Days/Recycling Coupon: Jill explained that the county has asked to discontinue the special event Chanhassen Recycling Day at the Environmental Center due to COVID concerns and traffic. The city will instead increase the value of the recycling coupon and encourage residents to use it at their convenience. Since the coupon won’t be available until the Connection is mailed in Feb. there will be a period of time when no coupons are available to the public. No complaints have been received. Markus wondered if a QR code could be used for access to the coupon when the printed version isn’t available. Jill will look into it. • Jill said she had talked to Bill Fouks, director of the Environmental Center, to see if he’d be interested and available for a virtual tour of the facility with the commission. He said he would be and that March would work best. The commission agreed that they would like to add that to the March agenda. • Applicant interviews for the commission will be done only with the City Council on Feb 8 and 22. One commissioner is invited to sit with the council for the interviews. Jeff will be willing and available to do so with Bill and Markus as alternates if needed. • There is a paper shredding event scheduled for May. The senior center is looking into scheduling a fall event as a fundraiser. • Emerald ash borer was confirmed in Chanhassen on Monday, Jan. 11. The city has notified the public of the discovery on social media and the website. A press release will run in the paper next week. • Xcel informed the city that they will be updating all of their street lights in town with LED this year. The commission wondered how many city owned street lights there are and how many have been updated. Jill will look into it. 2021 Recycling education event brainstorming: The commission agreed that it would be best to stick with one event in the fall, preferably in-person but with a back-up plan for a virtual event. October is the target month for the event. Ideas for presentations include: 2 • DemCon trailer. Greg will look into it and get back to the commission in Feb. • Tracey Anthony – sustainability/climate change talk • National weather service also a possibility. Contacts at the agency are known by commissioners. • Off the Blue Couch – recycling education mainly focused for kid audience. Greg has forwarded emails with their latest education offerings. • Stan Tekiela – micro plastics and birds The commission decided to discuss again in Feb and narrowed it down to DemCom, Blue Couch, or Stan. Looking online during the meeting Don saw that the DemCon trailer is $100/hour with a $100 mobilization fee. The commission wondered if they were able to do a virtual presentation if necessary. Markus wondered if the haulers have any content that the EC can use. Maybe they should be contacted and see what recycling items are accepted by each since the haulers don’t all accept the same items. Information should be shared. There’s also a good video from DemCon on recycling that should be shared. Arbor Day 2021: The commission brainstormed alternative event ideas since a group tree planting would not be happening. Perhaps city could do a film festival for Arbor Day similar to the movie event the watershed district did in the fall. Select a tree-themed movie to share. Jill will contact the watershed district to see how they planned their event. The commission would like it penciled in for May. The poster contest will be changed as well. The commission decided to open it up to anyone, not just 5th graders. Participants can submit their own original drawing. The deadline will be in April, maybe April 7 so that commissioners can look at posters before meeting. Jill can scan and send them to the commission. The poster theme will be ‘Trees are Terrific in Chanhassen’ to keep it simple. The commission would like the contest to be added to the February agenda to finalize the details. Advertising would happen throughout March. General Discussion: • Greg shared that the watershed district re-elected Sharon McCotter as chair of the Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC). The committee is always looking for volunteers. The CACs theme for 2021 is reconstruction of the lake shoreline. A major topic on the district board agenda was the Rice Marsh Lake water quality improvement project. A discussion was had as to how much the city will be contributing to the project. The plan was approved 3-2. The water quality of Rice Marsh is above the 10 year limit in spite of previous improvement in the watershed such as an alum treatment of Rice Marsh and the iron filings filtration system in Lake Susan which drains into Rice Marsh. This improvement project is separate and different from the project at St Hubert school. • Jill shared that the Carver County Environmental Center is accepting plastic bags again. Kristin said that was good since the collection station at Target is overflowing. Don said that Target is working on some interesting reuse projects with the bags. • Jill also noted that the Adopt A Highway sign on Hwy 5 in downtown Chanhassen doesn’t have a volunteer name on it. Perhaps it’s open? Don volunteered to look into it and contact MNDOT 3 to see if it’s available. The commission agreed that they would be interested in adopting a section if available. Meeting adjourned at 7:30 pm Minutes prepared by Jill Sinclair CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 22, 2021 Subject Receive Senior Commission Minutes dated January 15, 2021 Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.3. Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, Office Manager File No: PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council receives the Senior Commission Minutes dated January 15, 2021.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. ATTACHMENTS: Summary Minutes CHANHASSEN SENIOR COMMISSION MINUTES January 15, 2021 MEMBERS PRESENT AT THE SENIOR CENTER: none MEMBERS PRESENT via ZOOM: Lisa Lyons, Ruth Lunde, Bhakti Modi, Dorina Tipton, Linda Haight, Mack Titus. MEMBERS ABSENT: Jerry Cerchia, David Crouch. STAFF PRESENT: Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Mary Blazzanin STAFF ABSENT: none GUESTS: Dawn Plummer, Allison Streich, Kate Aanenson Approval of Agenda: Commissioner Lunde chaired meeting. Commissioner Titus moved to approve the Agenda. Commissioner Modi seconded the motion. All voted in favor and the motion carried. Senior Commission Minutes: Commissioner Titus mo ved to approve the Minutes. Commissioner Lyons seconded the motion. All voted in favor and the motion carried. Presentation by Allison Streich, Deputy Director – Carver County CDA: Carver County CDA (Community Development Agency) provides affordable housing opportunities and fosters community and economic development. The CDA manages approximately 630 housing units, 223 multi-family units, and over 130 project-based vouchers to support people in need. Some of the properties are age restricted (e.g. for Seniors) and others for the general population. Allison highlighted various projects and identified various types of affordable housing in Chaska, Carver, Chanhassen, Victoria, Waconia, Watertown, Mayer and Cologne. • The Bridges Program serves low-income individuals with mental illness to provide them with supportive resources and housing assistance. The rental subsidy is temporary and is intended to bridge the housing gap between exiting treatment centers, institutional facilities, and homelessness to permanent affordable housing. • The Permanent Supportive Housing program provides rent assistance for homeless and disabled individuals. • Housing Trust Fund assists homeless or near homeless people with disabilities to gain entry to housing and to achieve residential, economic, and emotional stability. Program participants pay 30 percent of their household income towards rent and the HTF subsidy covers the balance of the rent payable to the landlord. • Metro HRA administers the Housing Choice Voucher program for Carver County. The Housing Choice Voucher program uses the existing private rental market and provides payments to private landlords on behalf of low-income renters. Additional information available at the CDA website: carvercda.org. Allison discussed how several Carver County communities have initiated projects to bring in affordable housing. Kate Aanenson discussed the proposed next development of Powers Ridge, which includes 50+ units of proposed affordable housing for those within 60% of Area Median Income (AMI). Kate shared that Chanhassen is considering applying for a Community Growth Partnership Grant from Carver County CDA. Commissioners had multiple good questions and comments for the discussion with Allison and Kate. Housing Options for Seniors Task Force Update: The Task Force on Housing provided updates on what they have been learning and discussing in the last month. Additional suggestions related to Housing should be forwarded to Commissioners Lunde, Haight and Titus for consideration. Commissioners Lunde, Titus and Haight reported that they have been learning and educating themselves on topics related to housing for seniors. Commissioner Haight has information about making seniors safe in each room of their dwellings. They are obtaining information (have already talked with ACE hardware) regarding changes that help seniors to live safely in their homes, “Age in Place”. Commissioner Titus is interested in conducting a survey of people in Affordable Housing to obtain input on noticeable needs they have identified. Dawn Plummer, Carver County Health and Human Services: Dawn Plumer from Carver County provided information on Covid vaccinations administered thus far and plans for next phases. Information is available on the Carver County website. There was discussion on where to offer vaccinations for Seniors. Commissioner Haight suggested polling places as convenient venues for seniors to receive vaccinations. Commission Task Force report on recommendations for driving the “Information, Education and Outreach” goal. Commissioner Modi reported that they are still compiling information and will be ready to work with City Tech Team shortly. Senior Commission Annual Goals: Commissioners agreed to keep current high-level goals. Additional details can be added to the strategic plan if appropriate. Senior Commission Comments: Sharmeen Al-Jaff advised that the Chanhassen Housing Resource guide is in final draft and will be sent to design team shortly. Commissioner Titus noted that the Website for senior information should be made high priority. Sharmeen Al-Jaff informed the Commissioners that 3 Senior Commission vacancies will become available shortly and interviews will be conducted in February for potential new candidates. Adjournment: Commissioner Lunde called for meeting adjournment. All voted in favor and the motion carried. Prepared and submitted by Sharmeen Al-Jaff CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 22, 2021 Subject Resolution 2021XX: Resolution of Support for Galpin Blvd LRIP Grant Application Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.4. Prepared By Charlie Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer File No: PW176a PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves a Resolution of support for a MnDOT 2021 LRIP Grant application for the Galpin Boulevard (CR 117) Reconstruction Project.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY Galpin Boulevard is currently a County Road (CR 117). Due to condition of the roadway pavement along with needed mobility and safety improvements, reconstruction of the corridor is recommended rather than merely performing pavement rehabilitation. Obtaining State Grant funds will help offset the City's overall cost share required for the improvements. These are competitive grants and therefore not guaranteed to be awarded. The maximum grant award is $1.25M. If awarded, the grant funds would have to be used by 2023. Due to the size and complexity of the project, the City would not have enough time to perform design for 2022 construction and therefore are identifying 2023 construction in the application. The LRIP Grant applications are due by March 3, 2021 and we should be notified by the end of May if we were awarded funding. DISCUSSION The City has the Galpin Boulevard reconstruction project scheduled for 2024 construction based on known available funding at this time. The total project cost is estimated at $10.75M, a breakdown of which is shown below and outlined in our CIP as Project ST040. Any successful grant funding would be used to offset the City's MSA expenses, freeing more money up in that fund for other projects. Cost Total County City City Funding Source Construction (RoadwayMSA Eligible)8,000,000 5,600,000 2,400,000 MSA & Potential LRIP Grant Construction (Utilities)750,000 0 750,000 Enterprise Funds ROW 400,000 200,000 200,000 MSA & Enterprise Funds CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 22, 2021SubjectResolution 2021XX: Resolution of Support for Galpin Blvd LRIP Grant ApplicationSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.4.Prepared By Charlie Howley, Public WorksDirector/City Engineer File No: PW176aPROPOSED MOTION“The City Council approves a Resolution of support for a MnDOT 2021 LRIP Grant application for the GalpinBoulevard (CR 117) Reconstruction Project.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYGalpin Boulevard is currently a County Road (CR 117). Due to condition of the roadway pavement along withneeded mobility and safety improvements, reconstruction of the corridor is recommended rather than merelyperforming pavement rehabilitation. Obtaining State Grant funds will help offset the City's overall cost share requiredfor the improvements. These are competitive grants and therefore not guaranteed to be awarded. The maximum grantaward is $1.25M.If awarded, the grant funds would have to be used by 2023. Due to the size and complexity of the project, the Citywould not have enough time to perform design for 2022 construction and therefore are identifying 2023 construction inthe application.The LRIP Grant applications are due by March 3, 2021 and we should be notified by the end of May if we wereawarded funding.DISCUSSIONThe City has the Galpin Boulevard reconstruction project scheduled for 2024 construction based on known availablefunding at this time. The total project cost is estimated at $10.75M, a breakdown of which is shown below andoutlined in our CIP as Project ST040. Any successful grant funding would be used to offset the City's MSAexpenses, freeing more money up in that fund for other projects.Cost Total County City City Funding SourceConstruction (RoadwayMSA Eligible)8,000,000 5,600,000 2,400,000 MSA & Potential LRIP Grant Construction (Utilities)750,000 0 750,000 Enterprise Funds ROW 400,000 200,000 200,000 MSA & Enterprise Funds Soft 1,600,000 1,000,000 600,000 MSA & Enterprise Funds TOTAL 10,750,000 6,800,000 3,950,000 The City will use Municipal State Aid (MSA) dollars to fund our eligible cost share components, which do not include utility improvements; those would be funded by their respective Enterprise Funds. This project is not planning to utilize Special Assessments to benefiting properties as this is currently a County Road. Obtaining the grant funds allows the project to be moved forward a year which is a major benefit as City staff receive numerous inquiries from residents concerning the safety and mobility aspects of the corridor. The City is currently identified as the lead agency for the implementation of this project. This is due to a number of factors including the relative priority of the project in our eyes versus how the County views it; along with the push for reconstruction of the corridor rather than a more simple pavement preservation project. The reconstruction nature of the project is one of the main reasons this road could potentially be a jurisdictional turn back of the road from the County to the City, although this has not formally been agreed upon yet. Submitting the LRIP Grant application is not an agreement for a turn back. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Council support the LRIP Grant application submittal. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 21XX Proposed Design Layout Project Schedule LRIP Grant Application CIP Sheet CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA DATE: RESOLUTION NO: _________ MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR A MnDOT 2021 LRIP GRANT APPLICATION FOR THE GALPIN BOULEVARD (CR 117) RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT WHEREAS, Chanhassen staff have been working with representatives of Carver County on the planned reconstruction of Galpin Boulevard (CR 117) from TH 5 to the north City limits, and a preferred design was established as a part of a preliminary design study in 2018; and WHEREAS, the preferred design includes the reconstruction of Galpin Boulevard to Chanhassen and Municipal State Aid standards; and WHEREAS, the proposed improvements will address existing operational and safety issues along Galpin Boulevard and will include intersection, turn lane and trail improvements along the roadway; and WHEREAS, $75 million in MnDOT Local Road Improvement Program (LRIP) funding is currently available, with a cap of $1.25 million for each project, to help fund local improvements to roadways with regional significance, and Galpin Boulevard qualifies as a regionally significant roadway; and WHEREAS, the estimated construction cost for the proposed improvements to Galpin Boulevard is approximately $8 million, and the LRIP funds can be used on a majority of the elements included as a part of the roadway reconstruction work; however, additional funding will be needed beyond the potential $1.25 million in LRIP funds; and WHEREAS, Carver County and the City of Chanhassen will be responsible for the remaining costs if the project is successful in obtaining LRIP funds; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL: 1. Supports the reconstruction of Galpin Boulevard (CR 117); and 2. Supports the submittal of a MnDOT 2021 LRIP Grant Application for the project; and 3. Provides assurance that the City will pay for their share of the project improvement costs beyond the LRIP grant award. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 22nd day of February 2021. ATTEST: Heather Johnston, Interim City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT MAJESTIC WAYHUNTER DRLONGACRES DRRDTOPAZ DRHARRISONLAKELAKE LUCY RDPINEHURST DRCRESTVIEW DRW 65TH STWHITETA IL R IDGE CTMELODY HILL RDPHEASANT DRGALPIN B L V D ( C R 1 1 7 ) W 78TH STWALNU T CURVEBRINKER STGALPIN BOULEVARD (CR 117) RECONSTRUCTION PROPOSED ROADWAY PLAN AND PROFILENORTH ID Task Name Start Finish 1 TASK 1 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT Mon 8/2/21 Fri 10/28/22 2 1.1 Project Administration Mon 8/2/21 Fri 10/28/22 3 1.2 Monthly PMT Meetings (County and City) 18 1.3 Monthly Project Schedule Updates Mon 8/2/21 Fri 10/28/22 19 1.4 Quality Assurance (QA) Quality Control (QA)Mon 8/2/21 Fri 10/28/22 20 TASK 2 - GATHER BACKGROUND INFORMATION Mon 8/2/21 Fri 9/2/22 21 2.1 Topographic Survey Mon 8/2/21 Fri 10/1/21 22 2.2 Geotechnical Exploration and Analysis Mon 8/2/21 Fri 10/29/21 23 2.3 Private Utility Investigations and Coordination Mon 8/2/21 Fri 9/2/22 24 TASK 3 - STAKEHOLDER AND AGENCY ENGAGEMENT Mon 11/1/21 Fri 10/28/22 25 3.1 Chanhassen City Council Meetings (2) 26 Meeting 1 Mon 12/13/21 Mon 12/13/21 27 Meeting 2 Mon 8/8/22 Mon 8/8/22 28 3.2 Carver County Board Meetings (2) 29 Meeting 1 Tue 12/14/21 Tue 12/14/21 30 Meeting 2 Tue 8/9/22 Tue 8/9/22 31 3.3 Open House Meetings (2) 32 Open House 1 Mon 1/24/22 Fri 1/28/22 33 Open House 2 Mon 9/19/22 Fri 9/23/22 34 3.4 Other Stakeholder Meetings Mon 11/1/21 Fri 10/28/22 35 TASK 4 - FINAL DESIGN Mon 8/2/21 Fri 10/28/22 36 4.1 Construction Plans and Cost Estimates Mon 8/2/21 Fri 10/28/22 37 30% Plans Mon 8/2/21 Fri 12/31/21 38 60% Plans Mon 1/3/22 Fri 5/13/22 39 95% Plans Mon 5/16/22 Fri 9/2/22 40 Final Construction Plans (MnDOT Review & Approval)Mon 9/5/22 Fri 10/28/22 41 4.2 Project Manual Mon 8/1/22 Fri 10/28/22 42 4.3 Permitting Mon 5/16/22 Fri 10/28/22 43 TASK 5 - RIGHT OF WAY Mon 12/6/21 Fri 10/28/22 44 5.1 Right of Way Plan Mon 12/6/21 Fri 12/31/21 45 5.2 Parcel Sketches Mon 1/3/22 Fri 1/28/22 46 5.3 Appraisals Mon 1/31/22 Fri 4/15/22 47 5.4 Offers, Negotiations and Eminent Domain (if needed)Mon 4/18/22 Fri 10/28/22 48 PROJECT BIDDING AND AWARD Mon 10/31/22 Fri 2/3/23 49 PRECONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES Mon 2/6/23 Fri 3/31/23 50 CONSTRUCTION Mon 4/3/23 Fri 11/24/23 12/13 8/8 12/14 8/9 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 2022 Galpin Boulevard (CR 117) Reconstruction TH 5 to North Chanhassen Border Final Design and Construction Schedule March 2021 A. Applicant Information 1. Name (First & Last): Charles Howley 2. Phone Number: (952) 227-1169 3. E-mail: chowley@ci.chanhassen.mn.us 4. Agency Type: State Aid City 5. Agency Name: City of Chanhassen 6. Street Address: 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147 7. City: Chanhassen 8. State: MN 9. Zip Code: 55317 10. Sponsoring County and County Engineer name (required if applicant is small city or township) N/A B. Project Location 1. MnDOT District: Metro 2. County: Carver 3. City: Chanhassen 4. Township: 5. Name of Road: Galpin Boulevard (CR 117) 6. Type of Road: County Road 7. Road Authority Type (which agency owns and has jurisdiction of the road): County 8. Project Termini: From Trunk Highway (TH) 5 9. To: Chanhassen City Limits C. Project Description 1. Type of Project. Reconstruction 2. Select the LRIP Account requested for funding. Routes of Regional Significance 3. Provide a summary of the proposed project and the transportation deficiencies that will be eliminated, including a description of operational and general safety benefits of the project. Projects seeking funding from the Rural Road Safety Account will need to provide a more detailed description of safety issues and benefits under Section D3. The project includes the reconstruction of 2 miles of Galpin Boulevard (CR 117) between TH 5 and the north Chanhassen city limits to address operational and safety concerns, support residential development along the corridor, and provide for the multimodal needs of the area. A majority of the existing roadway has a rural section with very minimal shoulders and it is proposed to be reconstructed to an urban section with concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer, sidewalks and trails. Four stormwater treatment facilities are proposed along the corridor to retain and treat runoff. Proposed operational and safety improvements include the construction of a roundabout at West 78th Street and mini-roundabouts at Brinker Street and Lake Lucy Road to replace existing stop controlled intersections. Left and/or right turn lanes are also proposed at six other intersections along the corridor to provide dedicated lanes for turning vehicles. 10-foot wide trails are proposed along both sides of Galpin Boulevard for a majority of the corridor to provide for bicycle and pedestrian needs as there are currently no dedicated on-road or off-road facilities for these modes. Public engagement activities to date have identified a significant need for bicycle and pedestrian facilities along Galpin Boulevard. The proposed trails will provide a connection to the future Lake Ann Park trail loop east of Galpin Boulevard and to a future City of Shorewood trail north of the project limits. Residential development including approximately 170 new home sites is currently occurring in the central portion of the project area east of Galpin Boulevard. Galpin Boulevard provides the only access for this development and the proposed roadway improvements will serve the multimodal needs of the development and provide for the increased traffic volumes. D. LRIP Account Considerations and Eligibility D2. Routes of Regional Significance Account Considerations and Eligibility 1. For Routes of Regional Significance projects, which of the following criteria does your project meet (select all that apply)? Farm to Market route Part of an economic development plan X Provides capacity or congestion relief to a parallel trunk highway system or county road X Part of a 10-ton route network Connect to regional tourist destination X Is a connection to the regional system, trunk highway, or a county road 2. Describe the number of persons and potential multiple local agencies that will be positively impacted by the project and how they will benefit. The City of Chanhassen and Carver County are currently discussing the potential of a jurisdictional turnback of Galpin Boulevard from the County to the City as it functions more as a local collector than a County roadway. Improvements to Galpin Boulevard are needed to bring it to City standards as a part of the turnback process. The benefitting property owners along the corridor include a convenience store, a drug store, daycare center and preschool, and nearly 1,000 residential homes, most of which rely on Galpin Boulevard as their only or primary access. Users of the corridor that will benefit include motor vehicles (8,700 AADT on the south end near TH 5) and many bikers, joggers and walkers. TH 41 parallels Galpin Boulevard approximately 0.5 miles to the west, and improvements to Galpin Boulevard will also benefit the users of TH 41 (14,000 AADT) as an improved Galpin Boulevard will provide additional north/south capacity in the area. 3.Describe the project contribution to the local, regional or state economy, and economic development or redevelopment efforts. E. Project Readiness and Ability to Maintain 1. Estimated Construction Year: 2023 2. Are there railroad impacts (RR xing or RR tracks within 600’ of the project)? No 3. What is the status of the engineering and design work on the project? Preliminary design work has been completed and public engagement has been initiated to help determine the scope of the proposed improvements. Final design work is scheduled to begin in 2021. 4. Has this project been selected for federal funding, and if so what year in the STIP? No 5. Is right of way acquisition required? If so, describe the status of these efforts. Some right of way acquisition is required for the improvements. The most significant portion of additional right of way is along recent new residential development, and that area has already been dedicated by the developer via the platting process. It is anticipated that right of way strip takings will be required from an additional four properties and drainage and utility easements will be required from two properties for the stormwater treatment facilities. The project schedule provides adequate time for the right of way and easement acquisition process to allow construction to proceed in 2023. 6. Describe the local agency’s ability to adequately provide for the safe operation and maintenance of the facility upon completion. The City of Chanhassen is prepared for and has adequate staff and equipment available to provide for the long term operation and maintenance of Galpin Boulevard. F. Multimodal/Complete Streets Identify infrastructure improvements for non-motorized and/or transit users on this project. The project area is currently lacking dedicated bicycle and pedestrian facilities resulting in the use of narrow to non-existent roadway shoulders for these modes. In addition, there are few cross- walks along the corridor and sight distances are limited at many of the crosswalk locations due to the topography of the project area. The proposed improvements include the installation of over 3 miles of 10-foot wide trail along Galpin Boulevard to serve bicycles and pedestrians. The new trails will connect to a future regional trail loop in Lake Ann Park to the east and to a future City of Shorewood Trail along Galpin Boulevard north of this project. G. Estimated Project Cost Source of Funding 1. LRIP Request: $1,250,000 2. Federal Funds: $0 3. State Aid Funds: City of Chanhassen - $3,000,000 (before offset of LRIP funds received) 4. Local/Other Funds: Carver County Local Option Sales Tax $6,800,000, City Utility Enterprise $950,000 5. MnDOT Trunk Highway Funds: $0 6. Total Project Cost: $10,750,000 H. Attachments X At least one project location map with routes and project termini labeled X Engineer’s Estimate with an itemized breakdown X Project schedule X Local agency resolution X Other letters of concurrence or support Capital Improvement Program City of Chanhassen, MN Contact Charlie Howley 2021 2025thru Department Street Improvements Description The project will reconstruct Galpin Blvd from 78th Street north to the City limits. The street is proposed to have geometric improvements made to conform to current design standards and urbanized to have concrete curb and gutter. Turn lanes will be constructed and trail improvements made. This section of Galpin Blvd is on Carver County's turnback list for roadways to be jurisdictionally transferred to the local agency. Once Galpin Blvd is reconstructed the City would be responsible for operations and future maintenance. Project #ST-040 Priority n/a Justification The pavement of Galpin Blvd has reached its life expectancy. The roadway at this time should be reconstructed and designed to current standards. The project is also planned for growth in the area. Budget Impact/Other The project will require the City to have operational and maintenance over this section of Galpin Blvd. UsefulLifeProjectNameMSA-Galpin Blvd Imp (Hwy 5 N to City limits)Category Streets/Highways Type Improvement Account #2 Account #1 601-6040-4751 Total Project Cost:$10,840,000 Account #4 Account #3 Total20212022202320242025Expenditures 10,750,00010,750,000Construction 10,750,000 10,750,000Total Prior 90,000 Total Total20212022202320242025FundingSources 3,000,0003,000,000MSA 7,000,0007,000,000OtherAgencyContribution 250,000250,000SewerUtilityFund 500,000500,000WaterUtilityFund 10,750,000 10,750,000Total Prior 90,000 Total 107 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 22, 2021 Subject Resolution 2021XX: Resolution of Support for Market Blvd LRIP Grant Application Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.5. Prepared By Charlie Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer File No: PW236D PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves a Resolution of support for a MnDOT 2021 LRIP Grant application for the Market Boulevard Reconstruction Project.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY Market Boulevard is scheduled for reconstruction in the near future, currently 2023 on our schedule. It is in need of access and mobility improvements along with pavement and utility replacements. MnDOT has a competitive grant solicitation for local roadway improvements that could be used to offset the cost to the City. The maximum grant award is $1.25M. The City is soliciting letters of support from area businesses and the TCW Railroad to include with our application. The LRIP Grant applications are due by March 3, 2021 and we should be notified by the end of May if we were awarded funding. DISCUSSION The Project Costs are currently estimated at $4,000,000 for this grant application. The approved CIP identifies Project #ST048 as a total cost of $3,200,000, but we have increased the cost to include a higher level of bike and pedestrian mobility and enhanced safety measures for the railroad and pedestrian crossing of Market Boulevard. This is our main selling point for the grant. The scheduled funding sources include TIF proceeds from the Venue development, Municipal State Aid (MSA) funds, Special Assessments and the various Enterprise Funds for the utility related work. Item Amount TIF Assessment $ 2,100,000 Enterprise Funds $ 200,000 Special Assessments $ 680,000 MSA Funds $ 1,020,000 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 22, 2021SubjectResolution 2021XX: Resolution of Support for Market Blvd LRIP Grant ApplicationSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.5.Prepared By Charlie Howley, Public WorksDirector/City Engineer File No: PW236DPROPOSED MOTION“The City Council approves a Resolution of support for a MnDOT 2021 LRIP Grant application for the MarketBoulevard Reconstruction Project.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYMarket Boulevard is scheduled for reconstruction in the near future, currently 2023 on our schedule. It is in need ofaccess and mobility improvements along with pavement and utility replacements. MnDOT has a competitive grantsolicitation for local roadway improvements that could be used to offset the cost to the City. The maximum grantaward is $1.25M. The City is soliciting letters of support from area businesses and the TCW Railroad to include withour application.The LRIP Grant applications are due by March 3, 2021 and we should be notified by the end of May if we wereawarded funding.DISCUSSIONThe Project Costs are currently estimated at $4,000,000 for this grant application. The approved CIP identifiesProject #ST048 as a total cost of $3,200,000, but we have increased the cost to include a higher level of bike andpedestrian mobility and enhanced safety measures for the railroad and pedestrian crossing of Market Boulevard. Thisis our main selling point for the grant.The scheduled funding sources include TIF proceeds from the Venue development, Municipal State Aid (MSA) funds,Special Assessments and the various Enterprise Funds for the utility related work.Item AmountTIF Assessment $ 2,100,000Enterprise Funds $ 200,000 Special Assessments $ 680,000 MSA Funds $ 1,020,000 Total $ 4,000,000 Any proceeds from a successful grant award would be used to offset our MSA funding which would benefit the City immensely in implementing other MSA eligible projects and/or be used to lower the Special Assessments. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council provide a Resolution of support for the grant application. ATTACHMENTS: Project Schedule LRIP Grant Application Resolution 21XX CIP Sheet Proposed Design Layout ID Task Name Start Finish 1 TASK 1 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT Mon 5/31/21 Fri 9/30/22 2 1.1 Project Administration Mon 5/31/21 Fri 9/30/22 3 1.2 Monthly Project Schedule Updates Mon 5/31/21 Fri 9/30/22 4 1.3 Quality Assurance (QA) Quality Control (QA)Mon 5/31/21 Fri 9/30/22 5 TASK 2 - GATHER BACKGROUND INFORMATION Mon 5/31/21 Fri 7/29/22 6 2.1 Topographic Survey Mon 5/31/21 Fri 9/3/21 7 2.2 Geotechnical Exploration and Analysis Mon 5/31/21 Fri 9/3/21 8 2.3 Private Utility Investigations and Coordination Mon 8/2/21 Fri 7/29/22 9 TASK 3 - STAKEHOLDER AND AGENCY ENGAGEMENT Mon 7/5/21 Mon 9/26/22 10 3.1 Chanhassen City Council Meetings (2) 11 Meeting 1 Mon 9/13/21 Mon 9/13/21 12 Meeting 2 Mon 9/26/22 Mon 9/26/22 13 3.2 Open House Meetings (2) 14 Open House 1 Mon 9/27/21 Fri 10/1/21 15 Open House 2 Mon 9/12/22 Fri 9/16/22 16 3.3 Other Stakeholder Meetings Mon 8/2/21 Fri 9/2/22 17 3.4 TC & W Railroad Coordination Mon 8/2/21 Fri 7/29/22 18 TASK 4 - PRELIMINARY AND FINAL DESIGN Mon 5/31/21 Fri 9/30/22 19 4.1 Feasibility Report Mon 5/31/21 Fri 10/1/21 20 4.2 Construction Plans and Cost Estimates Mon 10/4/21 Fri 9/30/22 21 30% Plans Mon 10/4/21 Fri 12/31/21 22 60% Plans Mon 1/3/22 Fri 4/29/22 23 95% Plans Mon 5/2/22 Fri 7/29/22 24 Final Construction Plans (MnDOT Review & Approval)Mon 8/1/22 Fri 9/30/22 25 4.3 Project Manual Mon 7/4/22 Fri 9/30/22 26 4.4 Permitting Mon 5/2/22 Fri 9/30/22 27 TASK 5 - RIGHT OF WAY Mon 12/6/21 Fri 10/28/22 28 5.1 Right of Way Plan Mon 12/6/21 Fri 12/31/21 29 5.2 Parcel Sketches Mon 1/3/22 Fri 2/4/22 30 5.3 Appraisals Mon 2/7/22 Fri 4/1/22 31 5.4 Offers, Negotiations and Eminent Domain (if needed)Mon 4/4/22 Fri 10/28/22 32 PROJECT BIDDING AND AWARD Mon 10/31/22 Fri 2/3/23 33 PRECONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES Mon 2/6/23 Fri 3/31/23 34 CONSTRUCTION Mon 4/3/23 Fri 11/17/23 9/13 9/26 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 2022 Market Boulevard Reconstruction TH 5 to West 78th Street Final Design and Construction Schedule March 2021 A. Applicant Information 1. Name (First & Last): Charles Howley 2. Phone Number: (952) 227-1169 3. E-mail: chowley@ci.chanhassen.mn.us 4. Agency Type: State Aid City 5. Agency Name: City of Chanhassen 6. Street Address: 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147 7. City: Chanhassen 8. State: MN 9. Zip Code: 55317 10. Sponsoring County and County Engineer name (required if applicant is small city or township) N/A B. Project Location 1. MnDOT District: Metro 2. County: Carver 3. City: Chanhassen 4. Township: 5. Name of Road: Market Boulevard 6. Type of Road: Municipal State Aid Street 7. Road Authority Type (which agency owns and has jurisdiction of the road): County 8. Project Termini: From Trunk Highway (TH) 5 9. To: West 78th Street C. Project Description 1. Type of Project. Reconstruction 2. Select the LRIP Account requested for funding. Routes of Regional Significance 3. Provide a summary of the proposed project and the transportation deficiencies that will be eliminated, including a description of operational and general safety benefits of the project. Projects seeking funding from the Rural Road Safety Account will need to provide a more detailed description of safety issues and benefits under Section D3. The project includes the reconstruction of 1,500 feet of Market Boulevard between TH 5 and West 78th Street to address operational and safety concerns and support retail and residential redevelopment in the area. Market Boulevard is the primary entry into downtown Chanhassen from TH 5 and it provides access to a wide variety of retail, hospitality, and office uses as well as the Chanhassen Dinner Theatre, a US Post Office, a Carver County library, Chanhassen City Hall, and SouthWest Transit’s Chanhassen Station. The proposed operational and safety improvements include the reconstruction of the roadway to a four-lane section to provide additional capacity and the addition of dedicated left turn lanes at each intersection. Improvements will also be made to the existing Twin Cities & Western Railroad crossing. The City of Chanhassen completed an update of our Downtown Vision Plan in 2018, and the plan identified the need to make additional investments in downtown infrastructure to enhance access and safety and promote higher levels of pedestrian activity (see attached Connectivity and Proposed Enhancements exhibit from the Vision Update). Market Boulevard plays a critical role in the downtown infrastructure as a primary connection to TH 5. There are currently challenges in leasing space in downtown, the area is not functioning as planned, and there are concerns that the future success of the downtown area will be limited without these additional public investments. D. LRIP Account Considerations and Eligibility D2. Routes of Regional Significance Account Considerations and Eligibility 1. For Routes of Regional Significance projects, which of the following criteria does your project meet (select all that apply)? Farm to Market route X Part of an economic development plan Provides capacity or congestion relief to a parallel trunk highway system or county road X Part of a 10-ton route network X Connect to regional tourist destination X Is a connection to the regional system, trunk highway, or a county road 2. Describe the number of persons and potential multiple local agencies that will be positively impacted by the project and how they will benefit. Market Boulevard is a primary entrance into Chanhassen’s downtown business district from TH 5, providing access to over 750,000 square feet of retail development, 70,000 square feet of office space, 253 residential units, the Chanhassen Dinner Theatre (a regional attraction), SouthWest Transit’s 420 stall Chanhassen Station park and ride, a US Post Office, a Carver County library, and City Hall. The proposed improvements would benefit nearly all visitors to downtown Chanhassen by providing improved mobility, safety and access into downtown. This segment of Market Boulevard is heavily traveled with an AADT ranging from 15,000 on the south end to 10,700 on the north end and the proposed improvements would benefit all of these users. In addition, the City hosts a wide variety of community events throughout the year that annually bring 35,000 to 40,000 people into the downtown area including:  Easter Egg Candy Hunt  4th of July Celebration, Street Dance, Parade, Carnival  Summer Concert Series  Farmers Market  Memorial Day Ceremony  Tree Lighting Ceremony  Chanhassen High School Homecoming Parade A walkable and vibrant downtown is of great importance in the City’s efforts to continue to provide opportunities for its residents to connect with family and friends. 3.Describe the project contribution to the local, regional or state economy, and economic development or redevelopment efforts. Redevelopment of the area adjacent to the Chanhassen Dinner Theatre has recently occurred including 134 residential units and 20,000 square feet of retail space. There is potential for additional redevelopment in the area including the conversion of an existing movie theater to apartments and adding new square footage where remnant temporary parking and access drives could be removed. The proposed improvements to Market Boulevard are necessary to safely and efficiently provide access to the redevelopment area as well as accommodate destination and through traffic. E. Project Readiness and Ability to Maintain 1. Estimated Construction Year: 2023 2. Are there railroad impacts (RR xing or RR tracks within 600’ of the project)? Yes. Will obtain RR permit(s)/agreement(s) as needed. 3. What is the status of the engineering and design work on the project? A traffic study and concept design work has been completed to determine the proposed layout. Preliminary and final design work is scheduled to begin in 2021. 4. Has this project been selected for federal funding, and if so what year in the STIP? No 5. Is right of way acquisition required? If so, describe the status of these efforts. No 6. Describe the local agency’s ability to adequately provide for the safe operation and maintenance of the facility upon completion. The City of Chanhassen is currently responsible for the operation and maintenance of Market Boulevard and will continue to be upon the completion of the proposed improvements. F. Multimodal/Complete Streets Identify infrastructure improvements for non-motorized and/or transit users on this project. The Downtown Vision Plan Update identified the need to make downtown more walkable and to elevate the pedestrian realm along Market Boulevard. The proposed improvements include a sidewalk, a multi-use trail, an enhanced pedestrian crossing, and pedestrian scale lighting along Market Boulevard to improve the pedestrian network. The proposed improvements will also provide improved pedestrian, bicycle, bus, and park and ride customer access to SouthWest Transit’s Chanhassen Station along Market Street east of Market Boulevard. G. Source of Funding 1. LRIP Request: $1,250,000 2. Federal Funds: $0 3. State Aid Funds: $1,000,000 4. Local/Other Funds: $1,750,000 5. MnDOT Trunk Highway Funds: $0 6. Total Project Cost: $4,000,000 H. Attachments X At least one project location map with routes and project termini labeled X Engineer’s Estimate with an itemized breakdown X Project schedule X Local agency resolution X Other letters of concurrence or support CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA DATE: RESOLUTION NO: _________ MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR A MnDOT 2021 LRIP GRANT APPLICATION FOR THE MARKET BOULEVARD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT WHEREAS, Chanhassen staff have been planning for the reconstruction of Market Boulevard from TH 5 to West 78th Street, and a preferred design was established as a part of a corridor study that was completed in 2016; and WHEREAS, the proposed improvements include the reconstruction of Market Boulevard to a four- lane section to address existing operational and safety issues and provide for the access needs of the adjacent redevelopment area; and WHEREAS, $75 million in MnDOT Local Road Improvement Program (LRIP) funding is currently available, with a cap of $1.25 million for each project, to help fund local improvements to roadways with regional significance, and Market Boulevard qualifies as a regionally significant roadway; and WHEREAS, the estimated construction cost for the proposed improvements to Market Boulevard is approximately $3.2 million, and the LRIP funds can be used on a majority of the elements included as a part of the roadway reconstruction work; however, additional funding will be needed beyond the potential $1.25 million in LRIP funds; and WHEREAS, the City of Chanhassen will be responsible for the remaining costs if the project is successful in obtaining LRIP funds. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL: 1. Supports the reconstruction of Market Boulevard; and 2. Supports the submittal of a MnDOT 2021 LRIP Grant Application for the project; and 3. Provides assurance that the City will pay for their share of the project improvement costs beyond the LRIP grant award. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 22nd day of February 2021. ATTEST: Heather Johnston, Interim City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT Capital Improvement Program City of Chanhassen, MN Contact Charlie Howley 2021 2025thru Department Street Improvements Description Maintenance, rehabilitation, and/or reconstruction of local streets that are identified as part of the Municipal State Aid (MSA) system. These projects are programmed based on available funding and need, and then identified on the City's 5-year Capital Pavement Management Plan which gets updated annually. Funding from MSA can also be used for the City's share of County of MnDOT projects. Project #ST-048 Priority n/a Justification Roads deteriorate over time. The City performs preventative maintenance on roads to extend their useful life. Eventually all roads will need to be reconstructed once maintenance and/or rehabilitation techniques are not feasible. The City receives annual funding from MnDOT for State Aid roads. The funding comes in both a construction allotment and a maintenance allotment. If there is a need greater than the funding, MSA does allow for advancing funds from future year funding, but requires special approval. Budget Impact/Other The overall project cost is estimated at $3.2M, with $2.1M paid by TIF assessment. UsefulLifeProjectNameMSARoadwayImprovements - Market Blvd Category Streets/Highways Type Improvement Account #2 Account #1 420-4xxx-4xxx Total Project Cost:$1,100,000 Account #4 Account #3 Total20212022202320242025Expenditures 1,100,0001,100,000Improvement 1,100,000 1,100,000Total Total20212022202320242025FundingSources 910,000910,000MSA 35,00035,000SewerUtilityFund 35,00035,000SurfaceWaterUtilityFund 120,000120,000WaterUtilityFund 1,100,000 1,100,000Total 113 SOUTHWEST TRANSIT STATION CHANHASSEN DINNER THEATRE CUB FOODS TWIN CITIE S & W E S T E R N R A I L R O A D COUNTRY INN & SUITES W 78TH ST GREAT P LA INS B LVD MARKET S T W 79TH S TKERBER BLVDCARVER COUNTY LIBRARY IMPROVED RAILROAD CROSSING CHANHASSEN CITY HALL ENHANCED PEDESTRIAN CROSSING FUTURE TRAIL LEGEND PROPOSED ROADWAY CONCRETE WALK MULTI-USE TRAIL LANDSCAPED MEDIAN TREE MARKET BOULEVARD RECONSTRUCTION PROPOSED LAYOUT CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 22, 2021 Subject 2021 Fleet Purchases Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.6. Prepared By Charlie Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer File No: EQ016, EQ115, EQ124 PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council authorizes purchase of 2021 CIP Fleet vehicles/equipment.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY The City annually considers replacement of various components of its fleet (vehicles and equipment) that have reached their useful life and are showing signs of needing major maintenance. Our fleet has to be reliable to maintain expected and appropriate levels of service. This round of fleet replacement purchases includes a plow truck, a brush chipper and adding an additional skid loader. These items are identified in the approved 2021 CIP and the costs are under the budgeted amounts. DISCUSSION Item #1 (EQ016) Street Department Single axle dump truck, with sander, plow and wing 2021 Mack Chassis $ 105,211 JCraft plow/wing, box sander, hydraulics $ 104,245 Total $ 209,456 Budget $ 231,000 Item #2 (EQ115) Street Department Brush Chipper 2021 Vermeer BC 1800 XL $ 71,175 Budget $ 86,000 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 22, 2021Subject2021 Fleet PurchasesSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.6.Prepared By Charlie Howley, Public WorksDirector/City Engineer File No: EQ016, EQ115, EQ124PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council authorizes purchase of 2021 CIP Fleet vehicles/equipment.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYThe City annually considers replacement of various components of its fleet (vehicles and equipment) that have reachedtheir useful life and are showing signs of needing major maintenance. Our fleet has to be reliable to maintain expectedand appropriate levels of service. This round of fleet replacement purchases includes a plow truck, a brush chipperand adding an additional skid loader.These items are identified in the approved 2021 CIP and the costs are under the budgeted amounts.DISCUSSIONItem #1 (EQ016)Street Department Single axle dump truck, with sander, plow and wing2021 Mack Chassis $ 105,211JCraft plow/wing, box sander, hydraulics $ 104,245Total$ 209,456Budget$ 231,000Item #2 (EQ115)Street Department Brush Chipper2021 Vermeer BC 1800 XL $ 71,175Budget $ 86,000 Item #3 (EQ124) Parks Department Skid Loader 2021 S66 Bobcat $ 45,327 Budget $ 50,500 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Council authorization of the identified 2021 CIP fleet purchases. ATTACHMENTS: CIP Sheets Capital Improvement Program City of Chanhassen, MN Contact Charlie Howley 2021 2025thru Department Major Equipment Description These purchases are required to maintain a reliable truck fleet. Costs include truck chassis, dump box, hydraulic system, snow wing, snow plow, tarp and sander. These vehicles are purchased using the State of MN cooperative bid systems. Orders for truck chassis are typically required to be placed up to one year in advance of delivery. The 2025 purchase will be an addition to the fleet due to local street growth. We will not be replacing the 1996 John Deere 544G loader (#146) to allow for this addition. Replacement schedule is as follows: 2021 - #126 2001 Sterling L8513 Dump/Plow Truck-with plow, wing, tarp and sander (20 years old) 2022 - #127 2001 Sterling L8513 Dump/Plow Truck-with plow, wing, tarp and sander (21 years old) 2023 - #128 2003 Sterling L8513 Dump/Plow Truck-with plow, wing, tarp and sander (20 years old) 2024 - #104 2008 Mack GU713 with plow - Tandem Axle (16 years old) Project #EQ-016 Priority n/a Justification These vehicles are used to provide a variety of maintenance services throughout the community including winter response for plowing and hauling snow. The life expectancy of these vehicles is 18 years. Winter emergency service necessitates these vehicles be reliable and dependable. Growth in the community creates additional work for these trucks. These vehicle purchases are consistent with the Vehicle Replacement Schedule. Budget Impact/Other These purchases will include a limited warranty and will reduce the annual maintenance and repair costs as compared to the vehicles replaced. The old vehicles are primarily sold at auction. The cost shown does not include the offsets from trade-in or auction revenue. Useful LifeUnassignedProjectNameVehicleReplacement - Dump/Plow Trucks Category Street Equipment Type Vehicles Account #2 Account #1 400-4108-4704 Total Project Cost:$2,894,800 Account #4 Account #3 Total20212022202320242025Expenditures 1,304,000231,000 238,000 245,000 330,000 260,000Vehicles 231,000 238,000 245,000 330,000 260,000 1,304,000Total Prior 1,590,800 Total Total20212022202320242025FundingSources 1,304,000231,000 238,000 245,000 330,000 260,000CapitalReplacementEquipment Fund 231,000 238,000 245,000 330,000 260,000 1,304,000Total Prior 1,590,800 Total 32 Capital Improvement Program City of Chanhassen, MN Contact Charlie Howley 2021 2025thru Department Major Equipment Description This item is to replace the brush and tree limb chipper. This unit is used heavily year round by all the public works departments and needs to be in good working condition. 2021 - #147 1999 Vermeer 1800A Brush Chipper Project #EQ-115 Priority n/a Justification To keep equipment in good repair. This purchase is consistent with the vehicle replacement program. Budget Impact/Other UsefulLifeProjectNameBrushChipperCategory Street Equipment Type Equipment Account #2 Account #1 400-0000-4705 Total Project Cost:$86,000 Account #4 Account #3 Total20212022202320242025Expenditures 86,00086,000Equipment 86,000 86,000Total Total20212022202320242025FundingSources 86,00086,000CapitalReplacementEquipment Fund 86,000 86,000Total 51 Capital Improvement Program City of Chanhassen, MN Contact Charlie Howley 2021 2025thru Department Major Equipment Description The item would fund the annual trade in of skid loaders. All units are foot controlled, hand controls cost almost double. S=Wheels, T=Tracks S570 Bobcat Skidloader (#149) T590 Bobcat Skidloader (#413) S630 Bobcat Skidloader (#150) T750 Bobcat Skidloader (#318) We will be adding a 5th unit (S640) in 2021 due to heavy use and running high on hours which jeopardizes the trade-in program. Project #EQ-124 Priority n/a Justification Due to the state bid pricing, the City is able to trade our skid loaders annually on a price/hour cost, to a maximum number of hours. Trading in newer machines guarantees there will be no other expenses except oil changes and grease jobs because the machine will always have a warranty. This approach is also a better life cycle cost over keeping the machines for 15 years. There is no guarantee on the state bid pricing or the trade in price, so staff will be pricing annually to determine if it is a good deal or if we should hold on to the machine for an extended period. Budget Impact/Other Coding: 2021 trades 149, #150 & #413 - 400-0000-4705 318 - 700-7025-4705, 701-7025-4705, 720-7025-4705 2021 new purchase 400-0000-4705 - 70%, 700-7025-4705 - 10%, 701-7025-4705 - 10%, 720-7025-4705 - 10% 2022-2025 trades 400-0000-4705 - 73%, 700-7025-4705 - 9%, 701-7025-4705 - 9%, 720-7025-4705 - 9% UsefulLifeProjectNameAnnualSkidLoaderTradeInCategory Street Equipment Type Equipment Account #2 700-7025-4705 Account #1 400-0000-4705 Total Project Cost:$299,500 Account #4 720-7025-4705 Account #3 701-7025-4705 Total20212022202320242025Expenditures 190,50078,500 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000Equipment 78,500 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 190,500Total Prior 109,000 Total Total20212022202320242025FundingSources 137,71055,950 20,440 20,440 20,440 20,440CapitalReplacementEquipment Fund 17,5977,517 2,520 2,520 2,520 2,520SewerUtilityFund 17,5967,516 2,520 2,520 2,520 2,520SurfaceWaterUtilityFund 17,5977,517 2,520 2,520 2,520 2,520WaterUtilityFund 78,500 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 190,500Total Prior 109,000 Total 52 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 22, 2021 Subject Approve Consultant Contract for Sanitary Sewer Televising GIS Inventory Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.7. Prepared By Charlie Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer File No: n/a PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves a consulting contract with WSB for GIS support services pertaining to inventory of the City's sanitary sewer televising records.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY This contract is setup as a nottoexceed amount of $25,000, and will be invoiced based on work performed at the specified hourly rates. WSB is being asked to perform this work as it is a onetime task to support our oneman GIS department. WSB performs all of our GIS support work and has delivered great service to the City over many years. BACKGROUND The funding will come from our Consulting Services line item as part of the General Fund, Engineering Department. This fee was accounted for in our annual budget, but since the amount exceeds $20,000, we need City Council authorization. This inventory will allow city staff to both quickly retrieve sanitary sewer videos from our Datalink program and to also identify the gaps we may have in our overall televising program. Televising of sanitary sewer lines is one of the main tools we use to review for I&I issues which is a top priority of the department. We also are mandated through our state permitting to have an annual inspection program established for our sewer system. The Contract is attached to this staff report. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Contract. ATTACHMENTS: Contract 1 201749v1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this ______ day of February, 2021, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and WSB and Associates, Inc. dba WSB, a Minnesota corporation ("Consultant"). IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES. The City retains Consultant for Sanitary Sewer CCTV Video Inventory related GIS work. 2. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as the "Contract Documents," all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein: A. This Professional Services Agreement; B. Insurance Certificate; C. Consultant’s January 22, 2021 proposal for Sanitary Sewer CCTV Televising Video Inventory (“Proposal”). In the event of conflict among the provisions of the Contract Documents, the order in which they are listed above shall control in resolving any such conflicts, with Contract Document “A” having the first priority and Contract Document “C” having the last priority. 3. COMPENSATION. Consultant shall be paid by the City for the services described in the Proposal a not to exceed fee of Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00), inclusive of expenses. Services performed directly by Consultant shall be paid at an hourly rate in accordance with the Proposal, subject to the not to exceed fee. The not to exceed fees and expenses shall not be adjusted if the estimated hours to perform a task, the number of required meetings, or any other estimate or assumption is exceeded. Consultant shall bill the City as the work progresses. Payment shall be made by the City within thirty-five (35) days of receipt of an invoice. 4. DOCUMENT OWNERSHIP. All reports, plans, models, diagrams, analyses, and information generated in connection with performance of this Agreement shall be the property of the City. The City may use the information for its purposes. The City acknowledges that all reports, plans, models, diagrams, analyses, and information generated in connection with performance of this Agreement are created solely for the specific project covered by this Agreement and may not be suitable for reuse on other projects. The City also acknowledges that reuse of the reports, plans, models, diagrams, analyses, and information 2 201749v1 generated in connection with performance of this Agreement without the written verification or adaptation by Consultant will be done at the City’s sole risk and without liability to Consultant. 5. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders, regardless of amount, must be approved in advance and in writing by the City. No payment will be due or made for work done in advance of such approval. 6. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS. In providing services hereunder, Consultant shall abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations pertaining to the provisions of services to be provided. 7. STANDARD OF CARE. Consultant shall exercise the same degree of care, skill, and diligence in the performance of the services as is ordinarily possessed and exercised by a professional consultant under similar circumstances. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is included in this Agreement. City shall not be responsible for discovering deficiencies in the accuracy of Consultant’s services. 8. INDEMNIFICATION. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, and employees, of and from any and all claims, demands, actions, causes of action, including costs and attorney's fees, to the extent caused by the Consultant’s negligent performance of the services provided for herein. 9. INSURANCE. Consultant shall secure and maintain such insurance as will protect Consultant from claims under the Worker’s Compensation Acts, automobile liability, and from claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage which may arise from the negligent performance of services under this Agreement. Such insurance shall be written for amounts not less than: Commercial General Liability $2,000,000 each occurrence/aggregate Automobile Liability $2,000,000 combined single limit Professional Liability $2,000,000 each claim made/aggregate The City shall be named as an additional insured on the general liability policy on a primary and non- contributory basis. Before commencing work, the Consultant shall provide the City a certificate of insurance evidencing the required insurance coverage in a form acceptable to City. 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The City hereby retains Consultant as an independent contractor upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant is not an employee of the City and is free to contract with other entities as provided herein. Consultant shall be responsible for selecting the means and methods of performing the work. Consultant shall furnish any and all supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary for Consultant’s performance under this Agreement. City and Consultant agree that Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Consultant or any of Consultant's agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the City. Consultant shall be exclusively responsible under this Agreement for Consultant’s own FICA payments, workers compensation payments, unemployment compensation payments, 3 201749v1 withholding amounts, and/or self-employment taxes if any such payments, amounts, or taxes are required to be paid by law or regulation. 11. SUBCONTRACTORS. Consultant shall not enter into subcontracts for services provided under this Agreement without the express written consent of the City. Consultant shall comply with Minnesota Statutes § 471.425. Consultant must pay subcontractors for all undisputed services provided by subcontractors within ten (10) days of Consultant’s receipt of payment from City. Consultant must pay interest of one and five-tenths percent (1.5%) per month or any part of a month to subcontractors on any undisputed amount not paid on time to subcontractors. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) or more is Ten Dollars ($10.00). 12. CONTROLLING LAW/VENUE. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. In the event of litigation, the exclusive venue shall be in the District Court of the State of Minnesota for Carver County Minnesota. 13. MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT. Consultant must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it applies to (1) all data provided by the City pursuant to this Agreement, and (2) all data, created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant is subject to all the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, including but not limited to the civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.08, as if it were a government entity. In the event Consultant receives a request to release data, Consultant must immediately notify City. City will give Consultant instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold City, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers harmless from any claims resulting from Consultant’s officers’, agents’, city’s, partners’, employees’, volunteers’, assignees’ or subcontractors’ unlawful disclosure and/or use of protected data. The terms of this paragraph shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement. 14. COPYRIGHT. Consultant shall defend actions or claims charging infringement of any copyright or software license by reason of the use or adoption of any software, designs, drawings or specifications supplied by it, and it shall hold harmless the City from loss or damage resulting therefrom. 15. PATENTED DEVICES, MATERIALS AND PROCESSES. If the Contract requires, or the Consultant desires, the use of any design, devise, material or process covered by letters, patent or copyright, trademark or trade name, the Consultant shall provide for such use by suitable legal agreement with the patentee or owner and a copy of said agreement shall be filed with the City. If no such agreement is made or filed as noted, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all claims for infringement by reason of the use of any such patented designed, device, material or process, or any trademark or trade name or copyright in connection with the services agreed to be performed under the Contract, and shall indemnify and 4 201749v1 defend the City for any costs, liability, expenses and attorney's fees that result from any such infringement. 16. RECORDS. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records of hours worked and expenses involved in the performance of services. 17. ASSIGNMENT. Neither party shall assign this Agreement, or any interest arising herein, without the written consent of the other party. 18. WAIVER. Any waiver by either party of a breach of any provisions of this Agreement shall not affect, in any respect, the validity of the remainder of this Agreement. 19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. The entire agreement of the parties is contained herein. This Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof, as well as any previous agreements presently in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments, deletions, or waivers of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the parties, unless otherwise provided herein. 20. TERMINATION. This Agreement may be terminated by the City for any reason or for convenience upon written notice to the Consultant. In the event of termination, the City shall be obligated to the Consultant for payment of amounts due and owing including pa yment for services performed or furnished to the date and time of termination. Dated: _______________, 2021. CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: _____________________________________________ Elise Ryan, Mayor BY: _____________________________________________ Heather Johnston, Interim City Manager Dated: _______________, 2021. _______________________ BY: ____________________________________________ Its _______________________ 701 XENIA AVENUE S | SUITE 300 | MINNEAPOLIS, MN | 55416 | 763.541.4800 | WSBENG.COM January 22, 2021 Mr. Charles Howley Public Works Director / City Engineer City of Chanhassen P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Sanitary Sewer CCTV Televising Video Inventory Dear Mr. Howley: I am pleased to submit this work plan on behalf of WSB to assist the City of Chanhassen (the City) with the review, cleanup, and migration of its historical sanitary sewer CCTV televising video files. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING It is our understanding that the City seeks support for the review, cleanup, and migration of its sanitary sewer televising video to the cloud. The City has the goals of inventorying the video, matching videos with the appropriate GIS sanitary pipe assets, and providing a ubiquitous way to access the video. SCOPE OF WORK To achieve the City’s goals, WSB will perform the following tasks: 1. Video Inventory, Linking and Conversion WSB will use the City’s existing Televising Tapes Excel spreadsheet to match existing televising videos with the appropriate GIS sanitary pipe asset in GIS. A record will be created and stored in a GIS table where a match exists in the spreadsheet. Each record will include a hyperlink to the sewer video. Staff will be able to access these records in DataLink using the recently deployed Videos add-in. All linked videos will be converted to the mp4 format. This format allows the videos to be streamed within web browsers. WSB will also review all televising video that the City has received and archived on the City’s network (\\cfs5\Sewer Videos) from 2009 to the present that have a corresponding NASSCO PACP database. The inspection data from the NASSCO PACP databases will be added to the GIS table and be made available in DataLink. WSB will review existing as-built links for pipes reviewed as part of the video inventory and linking process. Updated links will be made in the City’s GIS database and matched with the appropriate as -built in Laserfiche. 2. Video Migration WSB will upload the converted videos to the City’s Amazon S3 endpoint and organize the videos by year televised. The uploaded videos will be configured as private and accessible only through DataLink and other web applications as requested by City staff. Mr. Charles Howley January 22, 2021 Page 2 SUMMARY Work done under this project will be billed on an hourly basis with the total cost not exceeding $25,000 and billed according to WSB’s 2021 Rate Schedule. WSB’s 2021 GIS staff rates are included below. It is expected that all work for this project will take place in 2021. If you agree with the proposal as outlined, please sign where indicated below and return one copy for our records. 2021 Rate Schedule Staff Role Rate/Hour Bryan Pittman Sr. GIS Specialist $139 Gregg Roemhildt Web Developer $152 Justin Hansen Director $174 Kyle Seifert GIS Specialist $81 Mike Phillippi GIS Specialist $96 Steve Gazdik Sr. GIS Specialist $121 Alex Johnson GIS Specialist $130 Vikrant Krishna Web Developer $174 Thank you for this opportunity to assist the City of Chanhassen with our GIS services. I am confident that the level of service on this project will meet or exceed your expectations. If you should have any questions regarding this proposal, please contact me at 763.202.3488. Sincerely, WSB Justin Hansen Director of GIS Services ACCEPTED BY: City of Chanhassen By: Title: Date: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 22, 2021 Subject Approve Amendment to Joint Powers Agreement of the Trunk Highway 5 Regional Trail & Underpass Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.8. Prepared By Jerry Ruegemer, Park and Recreation Director File No: PROPOSED MOTION The City Council approves the First Amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement for the City of Chanhassen's share of the cost participation of the Trunk Highway 5 Regional Trail and Underpass for a 5year payment schedule to reimburse Carver County. Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY In June of 2020, the City Council passed and authorized an increase in budgeted expenditures related to the City of Chanhassen's share (25%) of the Highway 5 Regional Trail and Underpass from $1,200,000 to $1,681,549. Increased construction expenditures exceeded the $1,200,000 that was approved on July 2, 2019 with the original Joint Powers Agreement with the City and Carver County. At the June, 2020 City Council meeting the city and county agreed upon a 5year payment schedule for the remaining balance of the construction project expenses. The city's share of the completed 2020 construction costs totaled $497,746.28 which was paid to Carver County. Breakdown of Payment Schedule 2020: Four Hundred NinetySeven Thousand, Seven Hundred FortySix Dollars and TwentyEight Cents ($497,746.28) 2021: Seven Hundred Two Thousand, Two Hundred FiftyThree Dollars and SeventyTwo Cents ($702,253.72) payable commensurate with invoices for work completed in 2020 and 2021 but invoiced in 2021, and NinetySix Thousand, ThreeHundred and Nine Dollars and SeventySeven Cents for work completed and invoiced in 2021. ($96,309.77) 2022: NinetySix Thousand, ThreeHundred and Nine Dollars and SeventySeven Cents ($96,309.77) 2023: NinetySix Thousand, ThreeHundred and Nine Dollars and SeventySeven Cents ($96,309.77) 2024: NinetySix Thousand, ThreeHundred and Nine Dollars and SeventySeven Cents ($96,309.77) 2025: N inetySix Thousand, ThreeHundred and Nine Dollars and SeventySeven Cents ($96,309.77) Payment Total:One Million, Sixhundred EightyOne Thousand, Five Hundred and FortyEight Dollars and EightySix Cents ($1,681,548.86). The First Amendment of the Joint Powers Agreement with Carver County illustrates the schedule and terms for the 5year interest free loan for the City of Chanhassen's share to complete the project. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 22, 2021SubjectApprove Amendment to Joint Powers Agreement of the Trunk Highway 5 Regional Trail &UnderpassSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.8.Prepared By Jerry Ruegemer, Park and RecreationDirector File No: PROPOSED MOTIONThe City Council approves the First Amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement for the City of Chanhassen's shareof the cost participation of the Trunk Highway 5 Regional Trail and Underpass for a 5year payment schedule toreimburse Carver County.Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYIn June of 2020, the City Council passed and authorized an increase in budgeted expenditures related to the City ofChanhassen's share (25%) of the Highway 5 Regional Trail and Underpass from $1,200,000 to $1,681,549. Increased construction expenditures exceeded the $1,200,000 that was approved on July 2, 2019 with the originalJoint Powers Agreement with the City and Carver County. At the June, 2020 City Council meeting the city andcounty agreed upon a 5year payment schedule for the remaining balance of the construction project expenses. Thecity's share of the completed 2020 construction costs totaled $497,746.28 which was paid to Carver County. Breakdown of Payment Schedule2020: Four Hundred NinetySeven Thousand, Seven Hundred FortySix Dollars and TwentyEight Cents($497,746.28)2021: Seven Hundred Two Thousand, Two Hundred FiftyThree Dollars and SeventyTwo Cents($702,253.72) payable commensurate with invoices for work completed in 2020 and 2021 but invoiced in2021, and NinetySix Thousand, ThreeHundred and Nine Dollars and SeventySeven Cents for workcompleted and invoiced in 2021. ($96,309.77)2022: NinetySix Thousand, ThreeHundred and Nine Dollars and SeventySeven Cents ($96,309.77)2023: NinetySix Thousand, ThreeHundred and Nine Dollars and SeventySeven Cents ($96,309.77)2024: NinetySix Thousand, ThreeHundred and Nine Dollars and SeventySeven Cents ($96,309.77)2025: N inetySix Thousand, ThreeHundred and Nine Dollars and SeventySeven Cents ($96,309.77)Payment Total:One Million, Sixhundred EightyOne Thousand, Five Hundred and FortyEightDollars and EightySix Cents ($1,681,548.86). The First Amendment of the Joint Powers Agreement with Carver County illustrates the schedule and terms for the 5year interest free loan for the City of Chanhassen's share to complete the project. RECOMMENDATION The City Council approves the First Amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement for the City of Chanhassen's share of the cost participation of the Trunk Highway 5 Regional Trail and Underpass for a 5year payment schedule to reimburse Carver County. ATTACHMENTS: JPA First Amendment JPA Original Page 1 of 5 FIRST AMENDMENT TO JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF TRUNK HIGHWAY 5 REGIONAL TRAIL AND UNDERPASS THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT FOR THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF TRUNK HIGHWAY 5 REGIONAL TRAIL AND UNDERPASS, (“First Amendment to JPA”), is made and entered into as of the day of ,2020, by and between the County of Carver, a political subdivision organized and existing under the Constitution and the laws of the State of Minnesota (“County”) and the City of Chanhassen, a political subdivision organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the state of Minnesota (“City”). The County and the City are each sometimes referred to hereinafter as “Party,” and are both sometimes referred to hereinafter as “Parties.” RECITALS WHEREAS, the County and the City entered a Joint Powers Agreement for the Design, Construction, Maintenance and Operation of Trunk Highway 5 Regional Trail and Underpass on or about July 2, 2019 (“JPA”); and WHEREAS, Section 4.01 of Article IV (Project Fees and Cost Sharing) of the JPA sets forth the allocation of the costs between the County and the City, and sets forth the proportion of various costs for which the City shall make reimbursement payments to the County; and WHEREAS, the Parties wish to amend Sections 4.01(b) and 4.05 (Payment to County) of Article IV (Project Fees and Cost Sharing) of the JPA according to the terms of this First Amendment to JPA. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants of each to the other Party as contained herein, and subject to the provisions of the Minnesota Constitution and Minnesota Statutes §§ 398.32 and 471.59, and for other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which the Parties hereby acknowledge, the Parties hereby covenant and agree as follows: ARTICLE I. THE AGREEMENT SECTION 1. AMENDED PROJECT COMPLETION DEFINITION. The parties agree to amend the JPA to replace the definition of “Project Completion” in the JPA in its entirety with the following: Project Completion occurs when the Parties agree that: 1) the Contractor has successfully completed all of the construction work concerning the original contract and any Change Orders Page 2 of 5 for the Project; and 2) the County received approval from its Board to make the final payment to the Contractor. SECTION 2. ALLOCATION OF COSTS. Paragraph (b) (Costs Remaining) of Section 4.01 (Allocation of Costs) of ARTICLE IV (Project Fees and Cost Sharing) of the JPA reads as follows: Section 4.01. Allocation of Costs. (b) Costs Remaining. (1) The Costs Remaining shall be allocated so that the County shall pay 50% of the Cost Remaining, the City shall pay 25% of the Cost Remaining, and the University shall pay 25 % of the Cost Remaining. (2) The Costs Remaining for the Design Phase Activities shall be allocated between the County, the City, and the University as set forth in this Agreement, regardless of whether a Party or the Parties exercise(s) its/their rights to withdraw from and cancel this Agreement under the terms of Article V, Section 5.01 of this Agreement. SECTION 3. AMENDED ALLOCATION OF COSTS. The Parties agree to amend Paragraph (b) (Costs Remaining) of Section 4.01 (Allocation of Costs) of ARTICLE IV (Project Fees and Cost Sharing) to include a payment schedule, and so that paragraph (b) reads as follows: Section 4.01 Allocation of Costs. (b) Costs Remaining. (1) The Costs Remaining shall be allocated so that the County shall pay 50% of the Cost Remaining, the City shall pay 25% of the Cost Remaining, and the University shall pay 25 % of the Cost Remaining. (2) The Costs Remaining for the Design Phase Activities shall be allocated between the County, the City, and the University as set forth in this Agreement, regardless of whether a Party or the Parties exercise(s) its/their rights to withdraw from and cancel this Agreement under the terms of Article V, Section 5.01 of this Agreement. (3) The City shall reimburse the County for the actual amount of the Costs Remaining allocated to the City pursuant to Section 4.01 in the annual amounts for each year listed below, and until the City makes the final payment of the actual amount of the Costs Remaining allocated to the City, which may be more or less than the amount of the annual payment listed below for the final year of 2025: Page 3 of 5 • 2020: Four Hundred Ninety-Seven Thousand Seven Hundred Forty-Six Dollars and Twenty-eight Cents ($497,746.28) • 2021: Seven Hundred Two Thousand Two Hundred Fifty-Three Dollars and Seventy- Two Cents ($702,253.72) payable commensurate with invoices for work completed in 2020 and 2021 but invoiced in 2021, and Ninety-Six Thousand Three-hundred and Nine Dollars and Seventy-seven Cents for work completed and invoiced in 2021. ($96,309.77) • 2022: Ninety-Six Thousand Three-hundred and Nine Dollars and Seventy-seven Cents ($96,309.77) • 2023: Ninety-Six Thousand Three-hundred and Nine Dollars and Seventy-seven Cents ($96,309.77) • 2024: Ninety-Six Thousand Three-hundred and Nine Dollars and Seventy-seven Cents ($96,309.77) • 2025 Ninety-Six Thousand Three-hundred and Nine Dollars and Seventy-seven Cents ($96,309.77) Payment Total: One Million Six-hundred and Eighty-One Thousand and Five Hundred and Forty-Eight Dollars and Eighty-Six Cents ($1,681,548.86). SECTON 4. PAYMENT TO COUNTY. Paragraph 4.05 (Payment to the County) of Section 4.03 (Adjustments and Reconciliation) of Article IV (Project Fees and Cost Sharing) of the JPA reads as follows: Section 4.05. Payment to County. The City shall reimburse the County for the City’s share of the Costs Remaining, pursuant to Section 4.01. Unless previously deposited as provided herein, the City shall pay these monies to the County within thirty (30) business days of being invoiced for the City’s Share of the Cost Remaining. The County shall invoice the Costs Remaining at the completion of Concept and Design Phase Activities, and upon completion of the Construction Phase Activities, unless an alternate schedule is mutually agreed upon in writing by the authorized representatives of the Parties. SECTION 5. AMENDMENT TO PAYMENT TO COUNTY. Paragraph 4.05 (Payment to the County) of Section 4.03 (Adjustments and Reconciliation) of Article IV (Project Fees and Cost Sharing) of the JPA shall be amended to reads as follows: Section 4.05. Payment to County and Default. (a) Payment to County. 1. For the year of 2020, the County shall send an invoice (“Invoice”) by USPS Mail to the City whenever the County reasonably determines that a Contractor has completed that Contractor’s portion of the Concept and Design Phase Activities or the Construction Phase Activities, unless an alternate schedule is mutually agreed upon in writing by the authorized representatives of the Parties. Page 4 of 5 2. Beginning in the year of 2021 and ending in the final year of 2025, the billing cycle shall be from July 1st of one year to July 1st of the next year, “Billing Cycle.” The County shall send the Invoice by USPS Mail on July 1st of each year identified herein, unless the Parties agree in writing upon an alternate schedule or as otherwise provided under 4.01(b)(3). The Invoice shall include the City’s share of the Costs of Remaining which the County reasonably determines have been completed by the Contractor during that Billing Cycle, and which have not been included in a prior Invoice. The Billing Cycle shall not alter the overall amount of the City’s annual obligations as set forth in Section 4.01(b)(3) above, although the Billing Cycle may alter when the City shall be obligated to pay said amounts to the County. 3. The City must pay the full obligation of the Invoice to the County within forty-five (45) business days of the date of the City’s receipt of said Invoice, unless the City notifies the County according to Section 4.05 (a)(4) below, that the City in good faith disputes the Invoice. 4. To dispute an Invoice in good faith, the City must notify the County in writing that the City considers the Invoice to be incorrect, defective, or otherwise improper, within ten (10) business days of receipt by the City of said Invoice. Said notice must include a written explanation containing the basis or facts supporting the City’s dispute. 5. Upon receiving written notification that the City in good faith disputes an Invoice according to Section 4.05(a)(4) above, the County may send a corrected invoice (“Corrected Invoice”) by USPS Certified Mail, return receipt requested, to the City. (b) Default. 1. In the absence the City notifying the County according to Section 4.05(a)(4) above, that the City in good faith disputes the payment obligation set forth in the Invoice or of a Corrected Invoice, any failure by the City to pay the full obligation of the Invoice or of the Corrected Invoice to the County within forty-five (45) business days of the date of receipt shall be an unexcused late payment (“Late Payment”) and a default of the JPA. 2. If the City has a Late Payment, then the City must also pay interest at a rate of 1 ½ percent per month or per part of a month to the County on the outstanding balance of an obligation not paid, until said outstanding obligation, including interest, has been paid in full to the County. 3. The imposition by the County of interest on any Late Payment the City owes to the County under this JPA does not thereby waive any other lawful remedy available to the County if the City fails to pay the full obligation of the Invoice, or of a Corrected Invoice if applicable, within forty-five (45) business days of the date of the City’s receipt of said invoice. Page 5 of 5 SECTION 6. OTHER TERMS OF JPA UNAFFECTED Except as set forth in this First Amendment to JPA, the terms of the JPA are otherwise unaffected and the JPA shall continue in full force and affect in accordance with all of its other terms. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, The Parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed. COUNTY OF CARVER CITY OF CHANHASSEN ______________________ ___________________________ Tim Lynch, County Board Chair Elise Ryan, City of Chanhassen Mayor Date: _________________ Date: ____________________ Attest: Attest: _______________________ ____________________________ Dave Hemze, County Administrator Heather Johnston, Interim City Manager Date: __________________ Date: ____________________ DocuSign Envelope ID: 1137F4C8-E643-4317-8CB7-FCBD96779C6C DocuSign Envelope ID: 1137F4C8-E643-4317-8CB7-FCBD96779C6C DocuSign Envelope ID: 1137F4C8-E643-4317-8CB7-FCBD96779C6C DocuSign Envelope ID: 1137F4C8-E643-4317-8CB7-FCBD96779C6C DocuSign Envelope ID: 1137F4C8-E643-4317-8CB7-FCBD96779C6C DocuSign Envelope ID: 1137F4C8-E643-4317-8CB7-FCBD96779C6C DocuSign Envelope ID: 1137F4C8-E643-4317-8CB7-FCBD96779C6C DocuSign Envelope ID: 1137F4C8-E643-4317-8CB7-FCBD96779C6C DocuSign Envelope ID: 1137F4C8-E643-4317-8CB7-FCBD96779C6C DocuSign Envelope ID: 1137F4C8-E643-4317-8CB7-FCBD96779C6C DocuSign Envelope ID: 1137F4C8-E643-4317-8CB7-FCBD96779C6C DocuSign Envelope ID: 1137F4C8-E643-4317-8CB7-FCBD96779C6C DocuSign Envelope ID: 1137F4C8-E643-4317-8CB7-FCBD96779C6C DocuSign Envelope ID: 1137F4C8-E643-4317-8CB7-FCBD96779C6C X 6/26/2019 | 7:57:27 AM PDT 7/2/2019 | 1:01:43 PM CDT 7/2/2019 | 3:58:04 PM CDT DocuSign Envelope ID: 1137F4C8-E643-4317-8CB7-FCBD96779C6C DocuSign Envelope ID: 1137F4C8-E643-4317-8CB7-FCBD96779C6C DocuSign Envelope ID: 1137F4C8-E643-4317-8CB7-FCBD96779C6C CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 22, 2021 Subject Fire Department Update Section FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE Item No: F.1. Prepared By Don Johnson, Fire Chief File No: SUMMARY Monthly update with call response data from January 2021. ATTACHMENTS: Narrative Graphs and Tables TO: Heather Johnston, Interim City Manager FROM: Don Johnson, Fire Chief DATE: February 22, 2021 SUBJ: Monthly Fire Department Update Fire Department Staffing Department staffing is at 41 paid on-call firefighters. A Fire Captain was placed on a six month personal leave during the first week of January. A probationary firefighter tendered resignation effective March 1 based on starting a new job as a Full-Time Fire/Medic on a full-time metro fire department. Fire Department Response The fire department responded to (59) calls for service in January. Call Breakdown for the month: 0 Chief Only 14 Day Only 24 Duty Crew 21 General Alarms Significant calls included the following:  (33) Rescue/EMS calls with (5) motor vehicle accidents.  (3) Fire Responses o Snowmobile on Fire in front of a residence on Tecumseh Ln o Car Fire on Flying Cloud Drive o Mutual Aid Structure Fire in Chaska Other Activities  Firefighters electing to receive the COVID Vaccine received their 2nd dose on January 28 or February 2. Heather Johnston Fire Department Update Page 2  A COVID Compliant “Black Hat” Ceremony occurred on February 15 with Deputy Mayor McDonald swearing in 4 firefighters moving off of probationary status.  I attended the Carver County Radio User Group meeting on February 17  Engine 13, a quick attack mini-pumper, returned to Fire Station 1 from Lift Station 24 due to low utilization. It will be placed back into primary service on medicals from Station 1. Monthly Training  Training schedule altered for February due to dangerously cold weather and wind chill temperatures. The training will be moved to on shift training for duty crews.  On Line learning classes on Ethics and Storage Facility Safety were assigned  Assistant Chief Nutter was attending International Code Council Continuing Education Classes the week of February 8. Fire Marshal Council Update for February  Several meetings and inspections at Chanhassen Brewery have taken place. Life safety inspections should be complete the week of February 15th.  Working through tenant design for new thermal barrier walls and high piled storage of food products at 2100 Stoughton Ave.  We are receiving good feedback from weekly social media postings on fire safety topics. Follow up calls and emails are coming in with follow up questions from the community. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Nov Dec Jan 2020‐2021 Calls by Month and Type Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Alarm Calls Good Intent Call Hazardous Condition Service Call Fire 94 88 76 64 71 88 102 85 85 79 84 86 80 75 65 79 77 74 78 82 65 84 75 83 59 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 5900000000000 Chanhassen Fire Department Calls By Month Comparison 2019 2020 2021 691 690 753 921 1,002 917 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Calls for Service by Year Rescue & Emergency Medical Service 56% Alarm Calls 14% Good Intent Call 8% Hazardous Condition 5% Service Call 12% Fire 5% 2021 Calls for Service by % of Call Type Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Alarm Calls Good Intent Call Hazardous Condition Service Call Fire S 10% M 24% T 12% W 13% TH 17% F 12% Sa. 12% 2021 CALLS BY DAY OF WEEK 0 50 100 150 200 250 4‐8a 8‐12p 12‐4p 4‐8p 8‐12a CALLS BY TIME OF DAY 2019 2020 2021 ³CH±"F) "F) ST117 H a z e ltin eBlvdArboretu mBlvd Hwy 7 ArboretumBlvd £¤212 GreatPlainsBlvdPowers BlvdPioneer TrlGalpinBlvdLyman BlvdPowers BlvdFlyi ngCloudDr Minnesota River Rice Lake Lake Riley Lake Susan Rice Marsh Lake Ann Lake St. Joe Harrison Lake Lake Lucy Lotus Lake Clasen Lake Minnewashta Lake Christmas Lake Document Path: K:\Departments\Fire\FireIncidents_RMS\2021-01(January)\FireIncidentMap_January2021.aprxDate Created: 2/12/2021 Created By: City of Chanhassen - Fire Department Calls For Service - January 2021 ³CH±City Hall "F)Fire Station Railroad Rivers Lakes Parks Parcel Boundaries Fire Box Alarm Zones North Box South Box West Box µ0 4,000 Feet 0 0.5 Mile City of Chanhassen Fire Calls for Service - January 2021 Basic Incident Date Time: Incident Type (Fd1.21): Elite mnfirereport Incident Type Report (Summary) Incident Type Total Incidents Total Incidents % of Incidents Total Property Loss Total Content Loss Total Loss Incident Type Category: 1 - Fire 111 - Building fire 1 1.7% 131 - Passenger vehicle fire 1 1.7%15,000 1,500 16,500 138 - Off-road vehicle or heavy equipment fire 1 1.7%2,000 0 2,000 Total: 3 Total: 5.1%Total: 17,000 Total: 1,500 Total: 18,500 Incident Type Category: 3 - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incident 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 28 47.5% 322 - Motor vehicle accident with injuries 4 6.8% 324 - Motor vehicle accident with no injuries.1 1.7% Total: 33 Total: 55.9%Total: 0 Total: 0 Total: 0 Incident Type Category: 4 - Hazardous Condition (No Fire) 424 - Carbon monoxide incident 1 1.7% 441 - Heat from short circuit (wiring), defective/worn 1 1.7% 461 - Building or structure weakened or collapsed 1 1.7% Total: 3 Total: 5.1%Total: 0 Total: 0 Total: 0 Incident Type Category: 5 - Service Call 551 - Assist police or other governmental agency 1 1.7% 554 - Assist invalid 4 6.8% 571 - Cover assignment, standby, moveup 2 3.4% Total: 7 Total: 11.9%Total: 0 Total: 0 Total: 0 Incident Type Category: 6 - Good Intent Call 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 3 5.1% 6111 - EMS Dispatched and cancelled en route 1 1.7% 651 - Smoke scare, odor of smoke 1 1.7% Total: 5 Total: 8.5%Total: 0 Total: 0 Total: 0 Incident Type Category: 7 - False Alarm & False Call 741 - Sprinkler activation, no fire - unintentional 1 1.7% 742 - Extinguishing system activation 1 1.7% 743 - Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 1 1.7% 744 - Detector activation, no fire - unintentional 1 1.7% 745 - Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 4 6.8% Total: 8 Total: 13.6%Total: 0 Total: 0 Total: 0 Total: 59 Total: 100.0%Total: 17,000 Total: 1,500 Total: 18,500 Report Filters is equal to 'Last Month' Report Criteria Is Not Blank Printed On: 02/01/2021 08:59:59 AM1 of 1 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 22, 2021 Subject Law Enforcement Update Section FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE Item No: F.2. Prepared By Lt. Lance Pearce, CCSO File No: BACKGROUND Reports are for January 2021. ATTACHMENTS: Cover memo Monthly breakdown Monthly report NIBRS codes Call trends Page 1 Memo TO: Mayor Ryan and Chanhassen City Council Members FROM: Lieutenant Lance Pearce DATE: February 16, 2021 RE: Law Enforcement Update Attached are the agenda items for the City of Chanhassen council meeting February 22, 2021, for your review and consideration. 1. Carver County Sheriff’s Office City of Chanhassen January 2021 Calls for Service Summary; Group A, Group B, Non-Criminal, Traffic and Administrative. 2. Carver County Sheriff’s Office City of Chanhassen January 2021 Arrest Summary. 3. Carver County Sheriff’s Office City of Chanhassen January 2021 Citation Summary. 4. January 2021 monthly breakdown 5. 2019-2020 Call trends 6. Staffing update: One vacancy in the contract (SRO) and one patrol assignment 7. Training update: Cold Weather firearm qualification. All staff will also attend Equity Innovation training in March and April 2021 (10 hours) Lieutenant Chanhassen Office January 2021 Carver County Sheriff’s Office City of Chanhassen Call for Service Total Patrol Activity=765 50 5 294 416 Felony Misdemeanor Non Criminal Traffic January 2021 Types of Calls CFS=765 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Felony Assault Felony Theft Drug Felony Other January 2021 Group A 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 January 2021 Non Criminal 10 283 36 121 Driving Complaint Traffic Stops Crashes Citations 2019-2021 Call Trends Carver County Sheriff’s Office City of Chanhassen 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Domestics by Month 2019 Domestics by Month 2020 Domestics by Month 2021 Domestics by Month 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Domestic Assault by Month 2019 Domestic Assault by Month 2020 Domestic Assault by Month 2021 Domestic Assault by Month 0 5 10 15 20 25 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Mental Health by Month 2019 Mental Health by Month 2020 Mental Health by Month 2021 Mental Health by Month 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Fraud/ Theft by Month 2019 Fraud/ Theft by Month 2020 Fraud/ Theft by Month 2021 Fraud/ Theft by Month CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 22, 2021 Subject Consider a Request for Variances, Including Exceeding the 1,000 SquareFoot, Detached Accessory Structure Size Limit, to Construct a Detached Garage and Add a Bathroom to an Existing Detached Structure on a Property Located at 10151 Great Plains Boulevard Section NEW BUSINESS Item No: I.1. Prepared By MacKenzie YoungWalters, Associate Planner File No: Planning Case No. 202108 PROPOSED MOTION The Chanhassen City Council denies the requested 1,842 squarefoot accessory structure size variance and adopts the Planning Commission's Findings of Fact and Decision. Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY During the February 2, 2021 public hearing, the Planning Commission voted 43 to deny the variance request. As the motion was not approved by a 3/4 majority vote, it has been forwarded to the City Council as a recommendation to deny the variance request. A full discussion of the requested variance can be found in the attached staff report. BACKGROUND On February 2, 2021, the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and voted 43 to deny the variance request. Since this motion was not approved with a 3/4 majority vote, the case was forwarded to the City Council for a decision. No member of the public spoke during the public hearing, though the applicant submitted statements from 11 neighbors indicating that they approved of/did not oppose the project. During the meeting, the Planning Commission expressed the following: 1. Chairman Weick asked if the existing detached garage could be expanded. Staff clarified that since the property was already over its 1,000 squarefoot limit, any expansion to the garage footprint would also require a variance. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 22, 2021SubjectConsider a Request for Variances, Including Exceeding the 1,000 SquareFoot, DetachedAccessory Structure Size Limit, to Construct a Detached Garage and Add a Bathroom to anExisting Detached Structure on a Property Located at 10151 Great Plains BoulevardSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: I.1.Prepared By MacKenzie YoungWalters, AssociatePlanner File No: Planning Case No. 202108PROPOSED MOTIONThe Chanhassen City Council denies the requested 1,842 squarefoot accessory structure size variance and adoptsthe Planning Commission's Findings of Fact and Decision.Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYDuring the February 2, 2021 public hearing, the Planning Commission voted 43 to deny the variance request. As themotion was not approved by a 3/4 majority vote, it has been forwarded to the City Council as a recommendation todeny the variance request. A full discussion of the requested variance can be found in the attached staff report.BACKGROUNDOn February 2, 2021, the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, met atits regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing onthe proposed variance preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from allinterested persons wishing to speak and voted 43 to deny the variance request. Since this motion was not approvedwith a 3/4 majority vote, the case was forwarded to the City Council for a decision.No member of the public spoke during the public hearing, though the applicant submitted statements from 11neighbors indicating that they approved of/did not oppose the project.During the meeting, the Planning Commission expressed the following:1. Chairman Weick asked if the existing detached garage could be expanded. Staff clarified that since the propertywas already over its 1,000 squarefoot limit, any expansion to the garage footprint would also require a variance. 2. Commissioner Randall asked if the historic significance of the property limited what the applicant could do. Staff noted that the city did not have a historic preservation ordinance which would constrain the applicant’s ability to modify the existing structures. 3. Commissioner Reeder asked if staff would have the same concerns about a home occupation if the proposed garage was attached rather than detached. Staff acknowledged that the applicant could construct an attached garage of similar size and that it could also be used to house a home occupation, but noted that in their experience, detached garages where much more likely than attached garages to be used for home occupations. 4. Commissioner Reeder asked if staff's main concern was potential use of the property to conduct a home occupation. Staff confirmed that the intent of limiting the size of detached accessory structures was to prevent their use for home occupations. 5. Commissioner Noyes noted that not all of the neighbors had responded to the survey, and asked if those that did not respond opposed the project. He noted that the wording of the survey seemed to ask for approval, not concerns. The applicant stated that they attempted to word the survey in a neutral manner and that he did not know why two of his neighbors did not reply. 6. Commissioner McGonagill asked how many classic cars were kept in the garage and if the applicant had investigated other storage options. The applicant responded that two classic cars would be kept there, and that even though it would be cheaper to store them off site, he preferred to keep them on site. He noted that he felt an additional outbuilding would complement the property’s historic farm aesthetic. 7. Commissioner McGonagill expressed concern that the summer kitchen was referred to as a “cottage” and felt that it implied a dwelling unit. The applicant said that the structure was originally a summer kitchen, though it no longer had a kitchen, and that they had no intention of using it as a dwelling unit. The applicant acknowledged it could be converted into a dwelling unit, although he reiterated that he had no intention of doing so. 8. Commissioner von Oven asked the applicant to clarify granting this variance would not establish a precedent. The applicant stated he understood the concern but felt his situation was unique. 9. Commissioner Reeder asked if the applicant would add an attached garage if the request was denied. The applicant said that would be a last resort as it would not go with the property’s historic character. 10. Chairman Weick asked if the single garage door would provide adequate access for the vehicles. The applicant stated that most of the vehicles stored there would not be moved and that the door would allow the van and tractor to easily enter and exit. 11 . Commissioner Reeder stated that the property is unique and not in the middle of residential neighborhood; therefore, he believed the request to be reasonable. 12. Commissioner McGonagill asked if they could rebuild the garage in the old barn's location and if the proposed garage looked like the old barn. Staff stated that a variance would still be required and that the garage did not resemble the old barn. 13. Commissioner McGonagill stated that he opposed the requested variance due to the almost 1,400 square feet of detached accessory structures already present and the fact that the request would double this. 14. Commissioner Randall stated that the property was large and of historical significance, and hoped that a compromise would be possible. 15. Commissioner Noyes stated that he was concerned with the precedence that granting the variance would establish. 16. Commissioner Reeder stated that not a lot of other properties would have similar historical significance, and that CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 22, 2021SubjectConsider a Request for Variances, Including Exceeding the 1,000 SquareFoot, DetachedAccessory Structure Size Limit, to Construct a Detached Garage and Add a Bathroom to anExisting Detached Structure on a Property Located at 10151 Great Plains BoulevardSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: I.1.Prepared By MacKenzie YoungWalters, AssociatePlanner File No: Planning Case No. 202108PROPOSED MOTIONThe Chanhassen City Council denies the requested 1,842 squarefoot accessory structure size variance and adoptsthe Planning Commission's Findings of Fact and Decision.Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYDuring the February 2, 2021 public hearing, the Planning Commission voted 43 to deny the variance request. As themotion was not approved by a 3/4 majority vote, it has been forwarded to the City Council as a recommendation todeny the variance request. A full discussion of the requested variance can be found in the attached staff report.BACKGROUNDOn February 2, 2021, the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, met atits regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing onthe proposed variance preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from allinterested persons wishing to speak and voted 43 to deny the variance request. Since this motion was not approvedwith a 3/4 majority vote, the case was forwarded to the City Council for a decision.No member of the public spoke during the public hearing, though the applicant submitted statements from 11neighbors indicating that they approved of/did not oppose the project.During the meeting, the Planning Commission expressed the following:1. Chairman Weick asked if the existing detached garage could be expanded. Staff clarified that since the propertywas already over its 1,000 squarefoot limit, any expansion to the garage footprint would also require avariance.2. Commissioner Randall asked if the historic significance of the property limited what the applicant could do. Staffnoted that the city did not have a historic preservation ordinance which would constrain the applicant’s ability tomodify the existing structures.3. Commissioner Reeder asked if staff would have the same concerns about a home occupation if the proposedgarage was attached rather than detached. Staff acknowledged that the applicant could construct an attachedgarage of similar size and that it could also be used to house a home occupation, but noted that in theirexperience, detached garages where much more likely than attached garages to be used for home occupations.4. Commissioner Reeder asked if staff's main concern was potential use of the property to conduct a homeoccupation. Staff confirmed that the intent of limiting the size of detached accessory structures was to preventtheir use for home occupations.5. Commissioner Noyes noted that not all of the neighbors had responded to the survey, and asked if those thatdid not respond opposed the project. He noted that the wording of the survey seemed to ask for approval, notconcerns. The applicant stated that they attempted to word the survey in a neutral manner and that he did notknow why two of his neighbors did not reply.6. Commissioner McGonagill asked how many classic cars were kept in the garage and if the applicant hadinvestigated other storage options. The applicant responded that two classic cars would be kept there, and thateven though it would be cheaper to store them off site, he preferred to keep them on site. He noted that he feltan additional outbuilding would complement the property’s historic farm aesthetic.7. Commissioner McGonagill expressed concern that the summer kitchen was referred to as a “cottage” and feltthat it implied a dwelling unit. The applicant said that the structure was originally a summer kitchen, though it nolonger had a kitchen, and that they had no intention of using it as a dwelling unit. The applicant acknowledged itcould be converted into a dwelling unit, although he reiterated that he had no intention of doing so.8. Commissioner von Oven asked the applicant to clarify granting this variance would not establish a precedent.The applicant stated he understood the concern but felt his situation was unique.9. Commissioner Reeder asked if the applicant would add an attached garage if the request was denied. Theapplicant said that would be a last resort as it would not go with the property’s historic character.10. Chairman Weick asked if the single garage door would provide adequate access for the vehicles. The applicantstated that most of the vehicles stored there would not be moved and that the door would allow the van andtractor to easily enter and exit.11 . Commissioner Reeder stated that the property is unique and not in the middle of residential neighborhood;therefore, he believed the request to be reasonable.12. Commissioner McGonagill asked if they could rebuild the garage in the old barn's location and if the proposedgarage looked like the old barn. Staff stated that a variance would still be required and that the garage did notresemble the old barn.13. Commissioner McGonagill stated that he opposed the requested variance due to the almost 1,400 square feetof detached accessory structures already present and the fact that the request would double this.14. Commissioner Randall stated that the property was large and of historical significance, and hoped that acompromise would be possible.15. Commissioner Noyes stated that he was concerned with the precedence that granting the variance wouldestablish. 16. Commissioner Reeder stated that not a lot of other properties would have similar historical significance, and that variances existed to deal with unique properties. 17. Commissioner von Oven stated that he was not sure it made sense to limit every property in the city to 1,000 square feet of detached accessory structures and wondered if a better system would be using a sliding scale based on lot size. He also expressed concern about establishing a precedent. 18. Chairman Weick asked if the entire property was buildable and stated that a reduction in buildable lot size may affect consideration of the plans. Staff stated that a portion of the property was encumbered by bluffs. 19. Commissioner Reeder asked if a walkway was constructed between the home and garage if it would be considered part of the main structure. Staff stated that they would need to see plans to make a determination, but that the Code considered structures with a common wall to be attached and that such a connection might meet City Code. 20. Commissioner Reeder stated that he felt that the city was being excessively strict by saying a garage was allowed in one place but not another due to the definition of detached accessory structure. 21. Chairman Weick asked how much of the property was buildable. Staff stated that they could not speculate as the survey did not delineate a bluff line. 22. Commissioner McGonagill stated that the variance was too large, but that reviewing the City Code’s detached accessory structure size limit made sense. 23. Commissioner von Oven expressed support for altering the City Code to accommodate larger detached accessory structures. After the public hearing, staff received a phone call from a neighbor wondering if the item had passed and, if so, if its passage would establish a precedent allowing them to also add another attached garage to the property. Staff informed them that the item had been forwarded to the City Council with a recommendation to deny and that each variance is evaluated based on the unique characteristics of the subject property. DISCUSSION The applicant is proposing a 76 squarefoot addition to add a bathroom on to an existing outbuilding, the farmhouse’s old summer kitchen, and constructing a detached garage/workshop with a 1,382 squarefoot main floor and approximately 864 square feet of upper level storage. As the property already has a 456 squarefoot summer kitchen, a 200 squarefoot garden shed, and a detached garage with a 728 squarefoot main level and 390 square feet of upper level storage, the applicant is requesting a 1,842 squarefoot accessory structure size variance. The applicant has stated that the intent of the variance is to add a restroom providing a more convenient bathroom location for themselves and visitors, and to facilitate the indoor storage of tractors and other equipment needed to maintain the nearly fiveacre site. The applicant has stated that the design of their addition and garage will be more architecturally compatible with the character of their historic property than alternatives such as adding an attached garage, and that being able to store vehicles within a structure will be more aesthetically pleasing then continuing to store them on the driveway. They observe that the proposed addition and building would not be highly visible from neighboring properties, and that the owners of eleven of the eighteen properties within 500 feet of theirs have indicated their support for the requested variance. Finally, they have stated that they do not intend to use the summer kitchen as a dwelling unit or to utilize the proposed detached garage as part of a home occupation. The applicant’s property is a unique one in the city with a distinct historic style and elements that invoke the farm that used to be on the site. Staff fully supports maintaining the existing historical flavor of the property; however, the property is no longer a farm and variances should only be granted that are in keeping with its current use as a single family residence.The city extended the 1,000 squarefoot accessory structure size limit to areas zoned Agricultural Estate District (A2) and Rural Residential District (RR) in recognition of the fact that these areas were by and large no CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 22, 2021SubjectConsider a Request for Variances, Including Exceeding the 1,000 SquareFoot, DetachedAccessory Structure Size Limit, to Construct a Detached Garage and Add a Bathroom to anExisting Detached Structure on a Property Located at 10151 Great Plains BoulevardSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: I.1.Prepared By MacKenzie YoungWalters, AssociatePlanner File No: Planning Case No. 202108PROPOSED MOTIONThe Chanhassen City Council denies the requested 1,842 squarefoot accessory structure size variance and adoptsthe Planning Commission's Findings of Fact and Decision.Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYDuring the February 2, 2021 public hearing, the Planning Commission voted 43 to deny the variance request. As themotion was not approved by a 3/4 majority vote, it has been forwarded to the City Council as a recommendation todeny the variance request. A full discussion of the requested variance can be found in the attached staff report.BACKGROUNDOn February 2, 2021, the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, met atits regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing onthe proposed variance preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from allinterested persons wishing to speak and voted 43 to deny the variance request. Since this motion was not approvedwith a 3/4 majority vote, the case was forwarded to the City Council for a decision.No member of the public spoke during the public hearing, though the applicant submitted statements from 11neighbors indicating that they approved of/did not oppose the project.During the meeting, the Planning Commission expressed the following:1. Chairman Weick asked if the existing detached garage could be expanded. Staff clarified that since the propertywas already over its 1,000 squarefoot limit, any expansion to the garage footprint would also require avariance.2. Commissioner Randall asked if the historic significance of the property limited what the applicant could do. Staffnoted that the city did not have a historic preservation ordinance which would constrain the applicant’s ability tomodify the existing structures.3. Commissioner Reeder asked if staff would have the same concerns about a home occupation if the proposedgarage was attached rather than detached. Staff acknowledged that the applicant could construct an attachedgarage of similar size and that it could also be used to house a home occupation, but noted that in theirexperience, detached garages where much more likely than attached garages to be used for home occupations.4. Commissioner Reeder asked if staff's main concern was potential use of the property to conduct a homeoccupation. Staff confirmed that the intent of limiting the size of detached accessory structures was to preventtheir use for home occupations.5. Commissioner Noyes noted that not all of the neighbors had responded to the survey, and asked if those thatdid not respond opposed the project. He noted that the wording of the survey seemed to ask for approval, notconcerns. The applicant stated that they attempted to word the survey in a neutral manner and that he did notknow why two of his neighbors did not reply.6. Commissioner McGonagill asked how many classic cars were kept in the garage and if the applicant hadinvestigated other storage options. The applicant responded that two classic cars would be kept there, and thateven though it would be cheaper to store them off site, he preferred to keep them on site. He noted that he feltan additional outbuilding would complement the property’s historic farm aesthetic.7. Commissioner McGonagill expressed concern that the summer kitchen was referred to as a “cottage” and feltthat it implied a dwelling unit. The applicant said that the structure was originally a summer kitchen, though it nolonger had a kitchen, and that they had no intention of using it as a dwelling unit. The applicant acknowledged itcould be converted into a dwelling unit, although he reiterated that he had no intention of doing so.8. Commissioner von Oven asked the applicant to clarify granting this variance would not establish a precedent.The applicant stated he understood the concern but felt his situation was unique.9. Commissioner Reeder asked if the applicant would add an attached garage if the request was denied. Theapplicant said that would be a last resort as it would not go with the property’s historic character.10. Chairman Weick asked if the single garage door would provide adequate access for the vehicles. The applicantstated that most of the vehicles stored there would not be moved and that the door would allow the van andtractor to easily enter and exit.11 . Commissioner Reeder stated that the property is unique and not in the middle of residential neighborhood;therefore, he believed the request to be reasonable.12. Commissioner McGonagill asked if they could rebuild the garage in the old barn's location and if the proposedgarage looked like the old barn. Staff stated that a variance would still be required and that the garage did notresemble the old barn.13. Commissioner McGonagill stated that he opposed the requested variance due to the almost 1,400 square feetof detached accessory structures already present and the fact that the request would double this.14. Commissioner Randall stated that the property was large and of historical significance, and hoped that acompromise would be possible.15. Commissioner Noyes stated that he was concerned with the precedence that granting the variance wouldestablish.16. Commissioner Reeder stated that not a lot of other properties would have similar historical significance, and thatvariances existed to deal with unique properties.17. Commissioner von Oven stated that he was not sure it made sense to limit every property in the city to 1,000square feet of detached accessory structures and wondered if a better system would be using a sliding scalebased on lot size. He also expressed concern about establishing a precedent.18. Chairman Weick asked if the entire property was buildable and stated that a reduction in buildable lot size mayaffect consideration of the plans. Staff stated that a portion of the property was encumbered by bluffs.19. Commissioner Reeder asked if a walkway was constructed between the home and garage if it would beconsidered part of the main structure. Staff stated that they would need to see plans to make a determination,but that the Code considered structures with a common wall to be attached and that such a connection mightmeet City Code.20. Commissioner Reeder stated that he felt that the city was being excessively strict by saying a garage wasallowed in one place but not another due to the definition of detached accessory structure.21. Chairman Weick asked how much of the property was buildable. Staff stated that they could not speculate asthe survey did not delineate a bluff line.22. Commissioner McGonagill stated that the variance was too large, but that reviewing the City Code’s detachedaccessory structure size limit made sense.23. Commissioner von Oven expressed support for altering the City Code to accommodate larger detachedaccessory structures.After the public hearing, staff received a phone call from a neighbor wondering if the item had passed and, if so, if itspassage would establish a precedent allowing them to also add another attached garage to the property. Staff informedthem that the item had been forwarded to the City Council with a recommendation to deny and that each variance isevaluated based on the unique characteristics of the subject property.DISCUSSIONThe applicant is proposing a 76 squarefoot addition to add a bathroom on to an existing outbuilding, the farmhouse’sold summer kitchen, and constructing a detached garage/workshop with a 1,382 squarefoot main floor andapproximately 864 square feet of upper level storage.As the property already has a 456 squarefoot summer kitchen, a 200 squarefoot garden shed, and a detachedgarage with a 728 squarefoot main level and 390 square feet of upper level storage, the applicant is requesting a1,842 squarefoot accessory structure size variance. The applicant has stated that the intent of the variance is to add arestroom providing a more convenient bathroom location for themselves and visitors, and to facilitate the indoorstorage of tractors and other equipment needed to maintain the nearly fiveacre site.The applicant has stated that the design of their addition and garage will be more architecturally compatible with thecharacter of their historic property than alternatives such as adding an attached garage, and that being able to storevehicles within a structure will be more aesthetically pleasing then continuing to store them on the driveway. Theyobserve that the proposed addition and building would not be highly visible from neighboring properties, and that theowners of eleven of the eighteen properties within 500 feet of theirs have indicated their support for the requestedvariance. Finally, they have stated that they do not intend to use the summer kitchen as a dwelling unit or to utilize theproposed detached garage as part of a home occupation.The applicant’s property is a unique one in the city with a distinct historic style and elements that invoke the farm thatused to be on the site. Staff fully supports maintaining the existing historical flavor of the property; however, theproperty is no longer a farm and variances should only be granted that are in keeping with its current use as a single family residence.The city extended the 1,000 squarefoot accessory structure size limit to areas zoned Agricultural Estate District (A2) and Rural Residential District (RR) in recognition of the fact that these areas were by and large no longer being used for agricultural pursuits and that large outbuildings attracted businesses that were not permitted in these areas. While staff acknowledges that the applicant has stated that it is not his intent to utilize the outbuilding as part of his home repair business or to use the summer kitchen as a second dwelling, variances do not expire on the sale or transfer of property. Once these structures are built, it becomes very difficult for staff to control how future owners use or repurpose them. Historically, staff has not supported variance requests where experience has shown that granting the variance has the potential to create subsequent Code compliance and enforcement issues. Additionally, staff does not believe that the applicant has demonstrated an inability to conduct similar improvements within the bounds of the City Code. The applicant has acknowledged that an attached garage could be added to the existing house and in theory an interior remodel could accommodate a bathroom within the existing footprint of the summer kitchen. The existing presence of a large detached garage and garden shed provides the property with a significant amount of storage space and reasonable use under the Zoning Code. Finally, it is the intent of the City Code to phase out nonconformities. In this case, the removal of the property’s barn once it was no longer being used as a farm, brought the property closer to the maximum accessory structure size limit. Granting a variance to add a new large outbuilding would not be in keeping with the city’s goal of bringing nonconforming properties into line with current City Code, nor would it be compatible with the city’s longterm plan for this area to develop as lowdensity residential neighborhoods. For these reasons, staff and the Planning Commission are recommending denial of the variance requests. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council deny the requested 1,842 squarefoot accessory structure size variance and adopt the Planning Commission's Findings of Facts and Decision.” If the City Council determines that the variance should be granted, staff recommends that the following motion and conditions of approval be adopted: The Chanhassen City Council approves a 1,842 squarefoot accessory structure size variance, subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decision. 1. A septic compliance inspection is required prior to any variance or building permit being issued for this property. Any property with a septic system located within 1,000 feet of a lake, pond or flowage or 300 feet of a river or stream requires a compliance inspection. This property is within 1,000 feet of a pond and does not have a valid compliance inspection on file in the past three years. 2. A building and plumbing permit must be obtained before beginning any construction. 3. Building plans must provide sufficient information to verify that the proposed building meets all requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code; additional comments or requirements may be required after plan review. 4. No portion of the garage/workshop may be used to conduct or be as part of a home occupation. 5. A second dwelling unit may not be created within the summer kitchen. 6. The summer kitchen may not be rented. 7. The improvements must substantially conform to the plans dated December 30, 2020. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 22, 2021SubjectConsider a Request for Variances, Including Exceeding the 1,000 SquareFoot, DetachedAccessory Structure Size Limit, to Construct a Detached Garage and Add a Bathroom to anExisting Detached Structure on a Property Located at 10151 Great Plains BoulevardSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: I.1.Prepared By MacKenzie YoungWalters, AssociatePlanner File No: Planning Case No. 202108PROPOSED MOTIONThe Chanhassen City Council denies the requested 1,842 squarefoot accessory structure size variance and adoptsthe Planning Commission's Findings of Fact and Decision.Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYDuring the February 2, 2021 public hearing, the Planning Commission voted 43 to deny the variance request. As themotion was not approved by a 3/4 majority vote, it has been forwarded to the City Council as a recommendation todeny the variance request. A full discussion of the requested variance can be found in the attached staff report.BACKGROUNDOn February 2, 2021, the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, met atits regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing onthe proposed variance preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from allinterested persons wishing to speak and voted 43 to deny the variance request. Since this motion was not approvedwith a 3/4 majority vote, the case was forwarded to the City Council for a decision.No member of the public spoke during the public hearing, though the applicant submitted statements from 11neighbors indicating that they approved of/did not oppose the project.During the meeting, the Planning Commission expressed the following:1. Chairman Weick asked if the existing detached garage could be expanded. Staff clarified that since the propertywas already over its 1,000 squarefoot limit, any expansion to the garage footprint would also require avariance.2. Commissioner Randall asked if the historic significance of the property limited what the applicant could do. Staffnoted that the city did not have a historic preservation ordinance which would constrain the applicant’s ability tomodify the existing structures.3. Commissioner Reeder asked if staff would have the same concerns about a home occupation if the proposedgarage was attached rather than detached. Staff acknowledged that the applicant could construct an attachedgarage of similar size and that it could also be used to house a home occupation, but noted that in theirexperience, detached garages where much more likely than attached garages to be used for home occupations.4. Commissioner Reeder asked if staff's main concern was potential use of the property to conduct a homeoccupation. Staff confirmed that the intent of limiting the size of detached accessory structures was to preventtheir use for home occupations.5. Commissioner Noyes noted that not all of the neighbors had responded to the survey, and asked if those thatdid not respond opposed the project. He noted that the wording of the survey seemed to ask for approval, notconcerns. The applicant stated that they attempted to word the survey in a neutral manner and that he did notknow why two of his neighbors did not reply.6. Commissioner McGonagill asked how many classic cars were kept in the garage and if the applicant hadinvestigated other storage options. The applicant responded that two classic cars would be kept there, and thateven though it would be cheaper to store them off site, he preferred to keep them on site. He noted that he feltan additional outbuilding would complement the property’s historic farm aesthetic.7. Commissioner McGonagill expressed concern that the summer kitchen was referred to as a “cottage” and feltthat it implied a dwelling unit. The applicant said that the structure was originally a summer kitchen, though it nolonger had a kitchen, and that they had no intention of using it as a dwelling unit. The applicant acknowledged itcould be converted into a dwelling unit, although he reiterated that he had no intention of doing so.8. Commissioner von Oven asked the applicant to clarify granting this variance would not establish a precedent.The applicant stated he understood the concern but felt his situation was unique.9. Commissioner Reeder asked if the applicant would add an attached garage if the request was denied. Theapplicant said that would be a last resort as it would not go with the property’s historic character.10. Chairman Weick asked if the single garage door would provide adequate access for the vehicles. The applicantstated that most of the vehicles stored there would not be moved and that the door would allow the van andtractor to easily enter and exit.11 . Commissioner Reeder stated that the property is unique and not in the middle of residential neighborhood;therefore, he believed the request to be reasonable.12. Commissioner McGonagill asked if they could rebuild the garage in the old barn's location and if the proposedgarage looked like the old barn. Staff stated that a variance would still be required and that the garage did notresemble the old barn.13. Commissioner McGonagill stated that he opposed the requested variance due to the almost 1,400 square feetof detached accessory structures already present and the fact that the request would double this.14. Commissioner Randall stated that the property was large and of historical significance, and hoped that acompromise would be possible.15. Commissioner Noyes stated that he was concerned with the precedence that granting the variance wouldestablish.16. Commissioner Reeder stated that not a lot of other properties would have similar historical significance, and thatvariances existed to deal with unique properties.17. Commissioner von Oven stated that he was not sure it made sense to limit every property in the city to 1,000square feet of detached accessory structures and wondered if a better system would be using a sliding scalebased on lot size. He also expressed concern about establishing a precedent.18. Chairman Weick asked if the entire property was buildable and stated that a reduction in buildable lot size mayaffect consideration of the plans. Staff stated that a portion of the property was encumbered by bluffs.19. Commissioner Reeder asked if a walkway was constructed between the home and garage if it would beconsidered part of the main structure. Staff stated that they would need to see plans to make a determination,but that the Code considered structures with a common wall to be attached and that such a connection mightmeet City Code.20. Commissioner Reeder stated that he felt that the city was being excessively strict by saying a garage wasallowed in one place but not another due to the definition of detached accessory structure.21. Chairman Weick asked how much of the property was buildable. Staff stated that they could not speculate asthe survey did not delineate a bluff line.22. Commissioner McGonagill stated that the variance was too large, but that reviewing the City Code’s detachedaccessory structure size limit made sense.23. Commissioner von Oven expressed support for altering the City Code to accommodate larger detachedaccessory structures.After the public hearing, staff received a phone call from a neighbor wondering if the item had passed and, if so, if itspassage would establish a precedent allowing them to also add another attached garage to the property. Staff informedthem that the item had been forwarded to the City Council with a recommendation to deny and that each variance isevaluated based on the unique characteristics of the subject property.DISCUSSIONThe applicant is proposing a 76 squarefoot addition to add a bathroom on to an existing outbuilding, the farmhouse’sold summer kitchen, and constructing a detached garage/workshop with a 1,382 squarefoot main floor andapproximately 864 square feet of upper level storage.As the property already has a 456 squarefoot summer kitchen, a 200 squarefoot garden shed, and a detachedgarage with a 728 squarefoot main level and 390 square feet of upper level storage, the applicant is requesting a1,842 squarefoot accessory structure size variance. The applicant has stated that the intent of the variance is to add arestroom providing a more convenient bathroom location for themselves and visitors, and to facilitate the indoorstorage of tractors and other equipment needed to maintain the nearly fiveacre site.The applicant has stated that the design of their addition and garage will be more architecturally compatible with thecharacter of their historic property than alternatives such as adding an attached garage, and that being able to storevehicles within a structure will be more aesthetically pleasing then continuing to store them on the driveway. Theyobserve that the proposed addition and building would not be highly visible from neighboring properties, and that theowners of eleven of the eighteen properties within 500 feet of theirs have indicated their support for the requestedvariance. Finally, they have stated that they do not intend to use the summer kitchen as a dwelling unit or to utilize theproposed detached garage as part of a home occupation.The applicant’s property is a unique one in the city with a distinct historic style and elements that invoke the farm thatused to be on the site. Staff fully supports maintaining the existing historical flavor of the property; however, theproperty is no longer a farm and variances should only be granted that are in keeping with its current use as a singlefamily residence.The city extended the 1,000 squarefoot accessory structure size limit to areas zoned AgriculturalEstate District (A2) and Rural Residential District (RR) in recognition of the fact that these areas were by and large nolonger being used for agricultural pursuits and that large outbuildings attracted businesses that were not permitted inthese areas. While staff acknowledges that the applicant has stated that it is not his intent to utilize the outbuilding aspart of his home repair business or to use the summer kitchen as a second dwelling, variances do not expire on thesale or transfer of property. Once these structures are built, it becomes very difficult for staff to control how futureowners use or repurpose them. Historically, staff has not supported variance requests where experience has shownthat granting the variance has the potential to create subsequent Code compliance and enforcement issues.Additionally, staff does not believe that the applicant has demonstrated an inability to conduct similar improvementswithin the bounds of the City Code. The applicant has acknowledged that an attached garage could be added to theexisting house and in theory an interior remodel could accommodate a bathroom within the existing footprint of thesummer kitchen. The existing presence of a large detached garage and garden shed provides the property with asignificant amount of storage space and reasonable use under the Zoning Code. Finally, it is the intent of the City Code to phase out nonconformities. In this case, the removal of the property’s barnonce it was no longer being used as a farm, brought the property closer to the maximum accessory structure size limit.Granting a variance to add a new large outbuilding would not be in keeping with the city’s goal of bringingnonconforming properties into line with current City Code, nor would it be compatible with the city’s longterm planfor this area to develop as lowdensity residential neighborhoods. For these reasons, staff and the PlanningCommission are recommending denial of the variance requests.RECOMMENDATIONStaff recommends the City Council deny the requested 1,842 squarefoot accessory structure size variance and adoptthe Planning Commission's Findings of Facts and Decision.”If the City Council determines that the variance should be granted, staff recommends that the following motion andconditions of approval be adopted:The Chanhassen City Council approves a 1,842 squarefoot accessory structure size variance, subject to theconditions of approval and adopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decision.1. A septic compliance inspection is required prior to any variance or building permit being issued for this property.Any property with a septic system located within 1,000 feet of a lake, pond or flowage or 300 feet of a river orstream requires a compliance inspection. This property is within 1,000 feet of a pond and does not have a validcompliance inspection on file in the past three years.2. A building and plumbing permit must be obtained before beginning any construction.3. Building plans must provide sufficient information to verify that the proposed building meets all requirements ofthe Minnesota State Building Code; additional comments or requirements may be required after plan review.4. No portion of the garage/workshop may be used to conduct or be as part of a home occupation.5. A second dwelling unit may not be created within the summer kitchen.6. The summer kitchen may not be rented. 7. The improvements must substantially conform to the plans dated December 30, 2020. ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report Findings of Fact and Decision_PC (Denial) Signed Findings of Fact_CC (Approval) Variance Document Development Review Application Description of Variance Request Justification of Request Key Photo of Similar Structure Photos and Elevations Plan Sheets Square Footages Letters to Neighbors and Response WRC Memo Affidavit of Mailing CITY OF CHANHASSEN PC DATE: February 2, 2021 CC DATE: February 22, 2021 REVIEW DEADLINE: March 1, 2021 CASE #: PC 2021-08 BY: MYW SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to construct a 2,246-square foot detached garage, 1,382-square foot main floor, and an approximate 864-square foot second floor, and 76-square foot addition to facilitate adding a bathroom to an existing outbuilding. As the City Code limits all property’s to a cumulative maximum of 1,000 square feet of accessory structures and the property has 1,384 square feet of existing accessory structures, a variance is necessary to add another garage and expand the existing outbuilding. LOCATION: 10151 Great Plains Boulevard APPLICANT: Ed Myslivecek 10151 Great Plains Boulevard Chaska, MN 55318 PRESENT ZONING: “A2” – Agricultural Estate District 2040 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Low Density ACREAGE: 4.37 acres DENSITY: NA LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The city’s discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The city has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicant is proposing a 76-square foot addition to add a bathroom on to an existing outbuilding, the farmhouse’s old summer kitchen, and constructing a detached garage/workshop with a 1,382-square foot main floor and approximate 864-square feet of upper level storage. PROPOSED MOTION: “The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments denies the requested 1,842 square foot accessory structure size variance and adopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decision.” 10151 Great Plains Boulevard February 2, 2021 Page 2 As the property already has a 456-square foot summer kitchen, a 200-square foot garden shed, and a detached garage with a 728-square foot main level and 390-square feet of upper level storage, the applicant is requesting a 1,842-square foot accessory structure size variance. The applicant has stated that the intent of the variance is to add a restroom providing a more convenient bathroom location for themselves and visitors, and to facilitate the indoor storage of tractors and other equipment needed to maintain the nearly five acre site. The applicant has stated that the design of their addition and garage will be more architecturally compatible with the character of their historic property than alternatives such as adding an attached garage, and that being able to store vehicles within a structure will be more aesthetically pleasing then continuing to store them on the driveway. They observe that the proposed addition and building would not be highly visible from neighboring properties, and that the owners of eleven of the eighteen properties within 500 feet of theirs have indicated their support for the requested variance. Finally, they have stated that they do not intend to use the summer kitchen as a dwelling unit or to utilize the proposed detached garage as part of a home occupation. The applicant’s property is a unique one in the city with a distinct historic style and elements that invoke the farm that used to be on the site. Staff fully supports maintaining the existing historical flavor of the property; however, the property is no longer a farm and variances should only be granted that are in keeping with its current use as a single-family residence. The city extended the 1,000-square foot accessory structure size limit to areas zoned Agricultural Estate District (A2) and Rural Residential District (RR) in recognition of the fact that these areas were by and large no longer being used for agricultural pursuits and that large outbuildings attracted businesses that were not permitted in these areas. While staff acknowledges that the applicant has stated that it is not his intent to utilize the outbuilding as part of his home repair business or to use the summer kitchen as a second dwelling, variances do not expire on the sale or transfer of property. Once these structures are built, it becomes very difficult for staff to control how future owners use or repurpose them. Historically, staff has not supported variance requests where experience has shown that granting the variance has the potential to create subsequent Code compliance and enforcement issues. Additionally, staff does not believe that the applicant has demonstrated an inability to conduct similar improvements within the bounds of the City Code. The applicant has acknowledge that an attached garage could be added to the existing house and in theory an interior remodel could accommodate a bathroom within the existing footprint of the summer kitchen. The existing presence of a large detached garage and garden shed provide the property with a significant amount of storage space and reasonable use under the Zoning Code. Finally, it is the intent of the City Code to phase out nonconformities. In this case, the removal of the property’s barn once it was no longer being used as a farm, brought the property closer to the maximum accessory structure size limit. Granting a variance to add a new large outbuilding would not be in keeping with the city’s goal of bringing nonconforming properties into line with current City Code, nor would it be compatible with the city’s long-term plan for this area to develop as low density residential neighborhoods. For these reasons, staff is recommending denial of the variance requests. 10151 Great Plains Boulevard February 2, 2021 Page 3 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 1, Section 1-2, Rules of Construction and Definitions Chapter 20, Article II, Division 3. Variances Chapter 20, Article II, Division 4. Nonconforming Uses Chapter 20, Article XII, “RSF” Single-Family Residential District Section 20-615, Lot Requirements and Setbacks Chapter 20, Article XXIII, Division 1. Generally Section 20-904, Accessory Structures Chapter 20, Article XXVIII, Bluff Protection BACKGROUND General History County records indicate that the home was built in 1872. In September of 2005, the city issued a building permit for the construction of a 1,118-square foot detached garage, 728-square foot main level and 390 square feet of second level storage. In May of 2006, the city issued a building permit for the construction of a 270-square foot addition to the existing summer kitchen. Several permits for interior work and maintenance are also on file with the city. Note: Two large barns had been present on the property from when it was an agricultural use, the last of these barns, an approximate 1,728-square foot structure, was removed between 2005 and 2008. Ordinance History In April of 1991, Ordinance Number 145 was passed establishing a 1,000-square foot size limit for accessory structures within the RSF and R-4 zoning districts. This ordinance was passed in response to large detached garages being constructed and subsequently used to house home occupations. In May of 2007, Ordinance Number 451 was passed extending the 1,000-square foot size limit to the A2, RR, and RLM districts. This ordinance was passed in response to large detached garages being constructed on formerly agricultural properties and subsequently being used to house home occupations. SITE CONSTRAINTS Zoning Overview 10151 Great Plains Boulevard February 2, 2021 Page 4 The property is zoned Agricultural Estate District and bluffs are present on the eastern and northern sections of the property. This zoning classification requires lots to be a minimum of two and one-half acres, have front and rear yard setbacks of 50 feet, side yard setbacks of 10 feet, and limits parcels to a maximum of 20 percent lot cover. Principal and accessory structures are limited to a maximum height of 35 feet. The total square footage for all accessory structures on a property is limited to a cumulative 1,000-square foot maximum. Structures must be setback 30 feet from the top, side, and toe of the bluff, and alteration of the land and vegetation within the bluff impact zone is heavily restricted. The lot is 4.37 acres with approximately 10,000 square feet (5.25 percent) of lot cover. The existing house has a nonconforming 3-foot front yard setback. The property has a summer kitchen, shed, and detached garage which combine for 1,384 square feet of accessory structures, exceeding the city’s 1,000-square foot maximum by 384 square feet. The house and other features appear to meet all other requirements of the City Code. Bluff Creek Corridor This property is not encumbered by the Bluff Creek Overlay District. Bluff Protection There are bluffs on the property. The city’s Bluff Protection Ordinance requires structures to be setback 30 feet from the top, toe, and side of the bluff and prohibits the alteration to land or vegetation within the bluff impact zone, the area of the bluff and within 20 feet of the top of the bluff. Stairways, lifts, and landings are permitted in areas where they will not redirect water flow or increase drainage velocity so long as they do not exceed four feet in width and meet other design criteria. Limited topographic alterations, grading, and filling within the bluff impact zone is permitted through an earthwork permit, subject to standards designed to protect the integrity of the bluff. No portion of the requested variance is expected to impact the bluff, and all proposed structures and addition will need to meet the requirements of the Bluff Protection Ordinance. Floodplain Overlay This property is not within a floodplain. Shoreland Management The property is not located within a Shoreland Protection District. Wetland Protection There is a basin which appears to show wetland characteristics; however, the city’s Water Resources Coordinator has determined, based on aerial photos and soil characteristics, that this 10151 Great Plains Boulevard February 2, 2021 Page 5 area is a created wetland in an upland area. Given this determination, the wetland would be considered incidental and would not be governed by the Wetland Conservation Act. No other areas exhibiting wetland characteristics are present on the property. NEIGHBORHOOD Great Plains Boulevard This area of the city does not have access to municipal services and properties are zoned A2. The area features several uses with commercial or recreational characteristics, i.e. the garden center and golf courses; however, most of the properties have single-family homes on relatively large lots. Several large outbuildings are present within this neighborhood, and the city has historically had issues with individuals running businesses out of these buildings. With the exception of the Halla Great Plains Addition to the northwest, which is guided for residential large lot and features one to three acre lots, all of the properties in this area are guided for residential low density. The city anticipates that once municipal services become available, the rest of this area will be developed into single-family neighborhoods with densities between 1.2 and 4 units per acre. These densities correspond with average lot sizes of between approximately 11,000 and 36,000 square feet, though the area’s environmental features could lead to the use of cluster zoning resulting in neighborhoods with dedicated open space and smaller lot sizes. Variances within 500 feet: There are no known variances within 500 feet of the property. ANALYSIS Detached Garage/Workshop The applicant is proposing constructing a detached accessory structure with a 1,382 square foot main floor and an approximate 864-square foot second floor storage area. The applicant describes the structure as a detached garage in the narrative and states that the intention of this 10151 Great Plains Boulevard February 2, 2021 Page 6 structure is to provide a covered location to store tractors and collector vehicles currently parked on the driveway. They have also stated that they do not intend to use the building as part of a construction business. Examining the plans, staff is very concerned that this structure will be used either by the applicant or a future owner to conduct a home occupation. The structure is described as a workshop on the submitted elevation drawings and in staff’s experience, structures oriented towards vehicle storage typically feature more than a single, centrally-oriented garage door. Since the applicant owns a home repair business that is registered to a residential property in another city, staff must note that if any portion of the business was conducted out of the requested detached accessory structure, even just office operations or storing materials before taking them out to a job site, the applicant would be in violation of the city’s home occupation ordinance which prohibits the use of any garage or accessory buildings for any home occupation. It has also been staff’s experience that in cases were an applicant understands and intends to abide by the city’s home occupation ordinance, they have little control over how the property is used by future landowners. Many times staff sees large lot properties with large detached accessory structures listed by realtors as prefect sites for landscaping or other businesses. Other times, staff finds out about the sale of these properties when neighbor’s call to complain about a new business. Due to the difficulties in proving how the interior of a building is being utilized, it is extremely time and labor intensive to follow up on these complaints and enforce the ordinance. For these reasons, a city-wide limit on accessory structure size was enacted in 2007. In examining the applicant’s property, staff notes that a detached garage with a 728-square foot footprint is already present on the property, as well as a 200-square foot garden shed. Staff believes that these two structures provide a reasonable amount of enclosed storage space for a single-family residence. While it is true that other properties in the area have larger detached garages, these were built before the current ordinance was passed, and the presence of nonconforming structures should not be used to justify granting a variance when a resident has reasonable use of their property. Additionally, as the applicant notes, they have the ability to add an attached garage to the house. While staff shares applicant’s concerns about the impact that a garage addition could have upon the historic character of the property, the city does not have a historic preservation ordinance or similar statute that would limit their ability to modify the 10151 Great Plains Boulevard February 2, 2021 Page 7 home. Staff believes that a thoughtfully designed attached garage could be compatible with the existing architecture. Variances should only be granted to provide relief from a practical difficulty caused by the property in question, and not to facilitate a preferred configuration. Finally, the property already exceeds the accessory structure size limit, which means that it falls under the city’s nonconforming use ordinance. Section 20-72(2) of this ordinance explicitly states that its intent is to “prevent the enlargement, expansion, intensification or extension of any nonconforming use, building or structure.” Granting a variance to permit the property to increase its existing nonconformity with a new structure that in and of itself exceeds what is permitted by ordinance would not be in keeping with the intent of the City Code. For these reasons, staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the requested variance for the detached garage/workshop. Summer Kitchen Bathroom The applicant is proposing a 76-square foot addition to allow for the installation of a bathroom in the property’s summer cottage. The applicant has stated that they need to construct the addition to allow for the creation of a basement under the bathroom to prevent pipes from freezing. They have indicated that their intent is just to have a more conveniently located restroom on the property and that they have no intention of converting the summer kitchen into a second dwelling unit. The City Code allows for bathrooms to be placed in outbuildings; however, since this property is already over the 1,000- square foot accessory structure size limit, a variance is required to expand the footprint of the summer kitchen. Since the property’s current amount of accessory structure square footage is nonconforming, the intent of the city’s nonconforming use ordinance is relevant to this request. It is the goal of the city’s nonconforming use ordinance to recognize existing uses and allow for their repair and maintenance, but also to prevent their expansion and encourage the elimination of nonconforming uses. Granting a variance to expand an existing nonconformity runs counter to the intent of the city’s ordinances. 10151 Great Plains Boulevard February 2, 2021 Page 8 Staff also notes that most single-family residences do not have bathrooms located in outbuildings and that the inability to add a bathroom to a detached accessory structure would not be considered an inability to enjoy reasonable use of a property. Similarly, the applicant could likely install a similar amenity within the footprint of the existing structure without requesting a variance. While additional cost may be necessary to ensure that the pipes did not freeze, variances should be granted to provide relief from an inability to comply with the zoning code rather than to accommodate a preferred or less costly design. Finally, while staff acknowledges that the applicant has stated that they have no intention of using the summer kitchen as a second dwelling, staff is concerned that future property owners would use the summer kitchen as either a short- or long-term rental. With two rooms and a bathroom, the summer kitchen would lend itself to use as a tiny house for vacation rentals or, with additional updates, as a full-on second dwelling unit. Staff believes that granting this variance would create the potential for future violations of City Code. For these reasons, staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the requested variance. Impact on Neighborhood The southern portion of the Great Plains Boulevard corridor has a rural character with relatively large lots. Many of these lots feature single-family homes and a few parcels host businesses such as a garden center or golf courses. Historically, the applicant’s property was a farm with multiple large outbuildings; however, the last barn was removed from the site between 2005 and 2008. Examining the surrounding area, staff observed that several nearby parcels have large outbuildings, though staff only identified one parcel with two large outbuildings. The applicant’s proposal to have three outbuildings over 500 square feet in size is atypical for a residential property, and approving the variance would result in five buildings being located on the parcel; the home, two garages, the summer kitchen, and garden shed. This number of buildings is not typical for a single-family residence or for the surrounding area. Staff agrees that the proposed addition to the summer cottage would likely not be visible from the road, though the detached garage would be, and also agrees that the location of the neighboring homes relative to the applicant’s property means that they would not be impacted by the proposed detached garage or addition. It should also be noted that the applicant wrote to their neighbor’s about the proposed project and that most expressed support for it. 10151 Great Plains Boulevard February 2, 2021 Page 9 While granting the requested variance to the present owner within the existing neighborhood context may not have a negative impact, these variances will create a property that lends itself to use for a home occupation and to the creation of a second dwelling unit. As the surrounding area develops into smaller lot single-family neighborhoods, the presence of a large detached garage/workshop will become increasingly undesirable and out of keeping with the area’s character. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, deny the requested 1,842-square foot accessory structure size variance and adopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decision.” If the Planning Commission determines that the variance should be granted, staff recommends that the following motion and Conditions of Approval be adopted: The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 1,842-square foot accessory structure size variance, subject to the Conditions of Approval and adopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decision. 1. A septic compliance inspection is required prior to any variance or building permit being issued for this property. Any property with a septic system located within 1,000 feet of a lake, pond or flowage or 300 feet of a river or stream requires a compliance inspection. This property is within 1,000 feet of a pond and does not have a valid compliance inspection on file in the past three years. 2. A building and plumbing permit must be obtained before beginning any construction. 3. Building plans must provide sufficient information to verify that the proposed building meets all requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code; additional comments or requirements may be required after plan review. 4. No portion of the garage/workshop may be used to conduct or be as part of a home occupation. 5. A second dwelling unit may not be created within the summer kitchen. 6. The summer kitchen may not be rented. 10151 Great Plains Boulevard February 2, 2021 Page 10 7. The improvements must substantially conform to the plans dated December 30, 2020. ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Decision (Denial) 2. Findings of Fact and Decision (Approval) 3. Variance Document (Approval) 4. Development Review Application 5. Description of Variance Request 6. Justification of Variance Request 7. Key 8. Photos and Elevations 9. Plan Sheets 10. Square Footages 11. Letters to Neighbors and Response 12. WRC Memo 13. Affidavit of Mailing g:\plan\2021 planning cases\21-08 10151 great plains blvd var\staff report_10151 great plains blvd_var.docx CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND MNNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION (DENIAL) IN RE: Application of Ed Myslivecek for a variance exceeding the accessory structure size limit by adding a bathroom onto a summer kitchen and constructing a deuched garage on a property zoned Agricultural Estate District (A2) - Planning Case 2021-08. On February 2, 2021, the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board ofAppeals and Adjustments, met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance preceded by published and mailed notice. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT l. The property is cunently zoned Agriculture Estate District (A2) 2. The property is guided in the chanhassen comprehensive Plan for Residential Low Density 3. The legal description ofthe property is: That part ofthe Southwest quarter ofSection 25. Township I 16, Range 23, Carver County. Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast comer of said Southwest quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees l2 minutes l0 seconds West along the South line ofsaid Southwest quarter a distance of 1538.77 feet; thence North I degee 0l minutes ll seconds East a distance of 17.00 feet to the point ofbeginning; thence North 50 degrees I I minutes 32 seconds East a distance of289.79 fee; thence North l8 degrees 47 minutes 49 seconds East a distance of417.75 feet; thence North 76 degees 26 minutes 34 seconds West a distance of591.83 feet to the centerline of State Highway No. l0l ; thence Southeasterly along said centerline a distance of705.73 feet to the point ofbeginning. 4. Variance F indinss - Section 20-58 ofthe Ci ty Code provides the following criteria for the granting ofa variance: a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive Plan. Finding: The city extended its maximum accessory stnrcture size limit to properties zoned A2 in 2007 due to the tendency for these buildings to be used to house contractors yards and landscaping business. The city determined that 1,000 square feet of accessory's structures provided sulficient storage space for single-family residences in all single-family residential districts. The applicant is proposing adding a garage/workshop sigrrificantly in excess ofthe 1,000 square foot limit on a property that already has over 1,000 square feet of detached accessory structures. The proposed structure is exactly the qpe of structure in exactly the I zoning district that Ordinance 451 was passed to prohibit. Granting the requested variance would not be in harmony with the purpose and intent ofthe zoning code. Similarly, the city's nonconforming use ordinance states that its express purpose is to prevent the expansion ofnonconforming buildings or structures and to encourage the elimination of nonconforming buildings and structures. Granting a variance to allow for the expansion of the nonconforming summer cottage and creation ofa new, larger, detached garage runs contrary to the intent ofthis ordinance. Finally, the city's Comprehensive Plan guides this area for residential low density development with densities of between 1.2-4 units per acre. The proposed outbuildings are not in keeping with and would not be compatible with the smaller lot residential neighborhoods envisioned for this area. b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficutties" as used in connection with the granting ofa variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Finding: The existing outbuildings on the property provide the applicant with a reasonable storage area for a single-family residence, and the applicant has options under the City Code for constructing additional garage space without a variance. Similarly, the City Code does not prohibit the applicant from installing a bathroom within the existing fooprint ofthe summer kitchen, it merely prevents the expansion of the nonconforming structure to accommodate the improvement. Since substantially similar results could be accomplished without a variance, the applicant does not have a practical diffrculty in complying with the zoning ordinance. c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. Finding: The variance request is not solely based upon economic considerations. d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. Finding: The plight ofthe landowner has been created by their design choices and not by any circumstance unique to the property. Additional storage and vehicle parking space could be created without a variance via an attached garage and a bathroom could be added to the outbuilding via an interior remodel rather than an addition. again without a variance. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character ofthe locality. Finding: The southern portion ofthe Great Plains Boulevard corridor has a rural character with relatively large lots. Many of these lots feature single-family homes and a few parcels host businesses such as a garden center or golfcourses. Historically, the applicant's property was a farm with multiple large outbuildings: however, the last bam was removed from the site between 2005 and 2008. Examining the surrounding area, staff observed that several e 2 nearby parcels have large outbuildings, though staff only identified one parcel with two large outbuildings. The applicant's proposal to have three outbuildings over 500 square feet in size is agpical for a residential propeny, and approving the variance would result in five buildings being located on the parcel; the home, two garages, the summer kitchen, and a garden shed. This number ofbuildings is not typical for a single-family residence or for the surrounding area. That being said, granting the requested variances in and ofthemselves would not alter the essential character ofthe locality; however, these variances will create a property that lends itselfto use for a home occupation and to the creation ofa second dwelling unit. Use ofthe property in this manner would have a negative impact on the character ofthe locality. f. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14. when in harmony with this Chapter. Finding: This does not apply to this request 5. The planning report #2021-08. dated February 2, 2021, prepared by MacKenzie Young-Walters. is incorporated herein. DECISION "The Chanhassen Board ofAppeals and Adjustments denies the requested 1,842-square foot accessory structure size variance and adopts the attached Findings ofFacts and Decision'" ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 2nd day of February, 2021 . CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY S en Weick. Chai g:\pl$\202 I pbmrg c.s\21{t l0l5l Sran pLE bh d !.rfndin8, of hd .!d deBioD l0l5 I 8r!.l PhG blvd E ( &!i.l) docx J / 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION (APPROVAL) IN RE: Application of Ed Myslivecek for a variance exceeding the accessory structure size limit by adding a bathroom onto a summer kitchen and constructing a detached garage on a property zoned Agricultural Estate District (A2) - Planning Case 2021-08. On February 2, 2021, the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and voted 4-3 to deny the requested variance. As the motion was not passed by a ¾ majority, it serves as a recommendation to the City Council. On February 22, 2021, the Chanhassen City Council met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the Planning Commissioner recommendation to deny the variance request and makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Agriculture Estate District (A2) 2. The property is guided in the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan for Residential Low Density. 3. The legal description of the property is: That part of the Southwest quarter of Section 25, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Southwest quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 12 minutes 10 seconds West along the South line of said Southwest quarter a distance of 1538.77 feet; thence North 1 degree 01 minutes 11 seconds East a distance of 17.00 feet to the point of beginning; thence North 60 degrees 11 minutes 32 seconds East a distance of 289.79 fee; thence North 18 degrees 47 minutes 49 seconds East a distance of 417.75 feet; thence North 76 degrees 26 minutes 34 seconds West a distance of 591.83 feet to the centerline of State Highway No. 101; thence Southeasterly along said centerline a distance of 705.73 feet to the point of beginning. 4. Variance Findings – Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the granting of a variance: a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Finding: Though the city does not have a historic preservation ordinance, the Comprehensive Plan states, “The city will continue to encourage the preservation, interpretation and active reuse of privately-owned historic buildings and structures, and will 2 work to protect such buildings and structures to the extent feasible during the development process.” The applicant’s property is a historic farmstead with the original farmhouse and summer kitchen preserving the unique architecture and character of the period. While the applicant could add an attached garage to the existing home, doing so would represent a departure from the site’s character. Similarly, the applicant could construct a larger garage by demolishing the existing outbuildings; however, doing so would result in the loss of the historically valuable summer kitchen. Granting a variance to enable a property owner to update their property in a manner that preserves its historic elements is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. While the city’s nonconforming use ordinance does seek to prevent the expansion of nonconforming structures, it is not intended to deny nonconforming properties the opportunity to conduct necessary and reasonable improvements. In this case, the nonconforming elements of the property cannot be eliminated without also damaging the historic value of the site. For this reason, it is appropriate to grant a variance allowing the applicant to expand the nonconforming elements of the property in the interest of historic preservation. b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties" as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Finding: The parcel’s size requires multiple pieces of equipment to maintain and the applicant cannot store all of the required items along with their personal vehicles in the garage present on the property. Multiple similarly sized properties in the area have larger garages in order to address this need. The pre-existing structures and historic nature of the property make it impossible for the applicant to create the necessary detached storage space without a variance. The City Code does not prohibit the installation of restrooms in outbuildings and other detached structures within the city have this amenity. In order to ensure that the bathroom’s plumbing does not freeze in the winter, a basement is required. The existing configuration of the summer kitchen means that an addition is the most viable way to add this amenity, and the pre-existing structures on the property mean that a variance is required to allow for the addition. c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. Finding: The variance request is not solely based upon economic considerations. d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. Finding: The plight of the landowner is due to the historic nature of the parcel. The age and unique architectural elements of the home render the addition of an attached garage undesirable. Additionally, the property was already over its maximum accessory structure size limit when the applicant bought the parcel. Options ordinarily available under the Code, 3 such as demolishing existing structures, would require the destruction of valuable historic elements of the property such as the original summer kitchen. e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Finding: The southern portion of the Great Plains Boulevard corridor has a rural character with relatively large lots. Many of these lots feature single-family homes and a few parcels host businesses such as a garden center or golf courses. Historically, the applicant’s property was a farm with multiple large outbuildings and the last barn was removed from the site between 2005 and 2008. Examining the surrounding area, several nearby parcels also have large outbuildings. Granting the applicant a variance to construct a detached garage in the approximate location of the old barn would not alter the essential character of the locality. Similarly, the proposed addition to the summer kitchen is relatively modest and it would not be readily visible from the road. Neither would the addition be visible from neighboring residences. Given the small scale and location of the proposed addition, it would not negatively impact the surrounding properties. f. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter. Finding: This does not apply to this request. 5. The planning report #2021-08, dated February 2, 2021, prepared by MacKenzie Young-Walters, is incorporated herein. DECISION “The Chanhassen City Council approves a 1,842-square foot accessory structure size variance, subject to the following conditions of approval: 1. A septic compliance inspection is required prior to any variance or building permit being issued for this property. Any property with a septic system located within 1,000 feet of a lake, pond or flowage or 300 feet of a river or stream, requires a compliance inspection. This property is within 1,000 feet of a pond and does not have a valid compliance inspection on file in the past three years. 2. A building and plumbing permit must be obtained before beginning any construction. 3. Building plans must provide sufficient information to verify that the proposed building meets all requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code; additional comments or requirements may be required after plan review. 4. No portion of the garage/workshop may be used to conduct or as part of a home occupation. 5. A second dwelling unit may not be created within the summer kitchen. 6. The summer kitchen may not be rented. 7. The improvements must substantially conform to the plans dated December 30, 2020. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 22nd day of February, 2021. CITY OF CHANHASSEN 4 BY: Elise Ryan, Mayor g:\plan\2021 planning cases\21-08 10151 great plains blvd var\findings of fact and decision 10151 great plains blvd var (approval).docx 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA VARIANCE 2021-08 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants the following variance: The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 1,842-square foot accessory structure size variance. 2. Property. The variance is for a property situated in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota, and legally described as: That part of the Southwest quarter of Section 25, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Southwest quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 12 minutes 10 seconds West along the South line of said Southwest quarter a distance of 1538.77 feet; thence North 1 degree 01 minutes 11 seconds East a distance of 17.00 feet to the point of beginning; thence North 60 degrees 11 minutes 32 seconds East a distance of 289.79 fee; thence North 18 degrees 47 minutes 49 seconds East a distance of 417.75 feet; thence North 76 degrees 26 minutes 34 seconds West a distance of 591.83 feet to the centerline of State Highway No. 101; thence Southeasterly along said centerline a distance of 705.73 feet to the point of beginning. 3. Conditions. The variance approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. A septic compliance inspection is required prior to any variance or building permit being issued for this property. Any property with a septic system located within 1,000 feet of a lake, pond or flowage or 300 feet of a river or stream, requires a compliance inspection. This property is within 1,000 feet of a pond and does not have a valid compliance inspection on file in the past three years. 2 2. A building and plumbing permit must be obtained before beginning any construction. 3. Building plans must provide sufficient information to verify that proposed building meets all requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code; additional comments or requirements may be required after plan review. 4. No portion of the garage/workshop may be used to conduct or be as part of a home occupation. 5. A second dwelling unit may not be created within the summer kitchen. 6. The summer kitchen may not be rented. 7. The improvements must substantially conform to the plans dated December 30, 2020. 4. Lapse. If within one (1) year of the issuance of this variance the allowed construction has not been substantially completed, this variance shall lapse. Dated: February 2, 2021 CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: (SEAL) Elise Ryan, Mayor AND: Heather Johnston, Interim City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2021 by Elise Ryan, Mayor, and Heather Johnston, Interim City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 g:\plan\2021 planning cases\21-08 10151 great plains blvd var\variance document 21-08.docx Ed Myslivecek 10151 Great Plains Blvd. Chaska, MN 55318 To: Chanhassen Building Commission Board Ref: Bath addition and garage construction 10151 Great Plains Blvd The variance to permit construction on the above property is necessary prefaced that the external out buildings exceed the 1000 square foot maximum on the property. Construction of an 80 square foot addition to an existing building (summer kitchen) would be as such to blend in with similar siding, roofing and windows. This addition will compliment the structures on the property as a whole. This addition is for use by the owner's for bodily function convenlence when using said structure. No intent is considered for the use of this structure to be one of a separate living structure. A current description of buildings such as this may be called an accessory building, used for anything from listening and making music (houses musical instruments) and church youth group meetings. The addition would not be visible from any neighbor from all cardinal directions. This property is one of three that are on the newly renovated Highway 101 that goes from Pioneer Trail to Hwy 61 Flying Cloud Drive. The rebuilding of the old barn is for vehicle storage to keep them out of sight and the weather. best out of sight enclosed bringing the overall view less congested. ClTy 0F CHANHASSEN RECEIVED DEC $ 1 2020 CHANHASSEN PI.A]{NIiIG DEPT The property is almost 5 acres in measured acreage and said additions are not affecting any property distance restrictions. The additions would enhance the visual aspect of the current property and buildings. Multiple structures were once on this property as accessory bin structures a few years back. The age of the existing structures (mid 19th century) and the assoftment of out buildings used to house livestock and implements necessitated the use of buildings to work the land as a local farm. No longer such a property, the addition of my request will enhance the grounds to please one with a nostalgic and pleasing view if time was taken to absorb this parcel. Some vehicles are on the drive and would be There are no economic considerations with the request to build the addition. Ed Myslivecek 10151 Great Plains Blvd. Chaska, MN 55318 l.There are currently 172 National Register properties in Carver County, 10151 Great Plains Blvd. Chaska 55318 is not on the list. 2. Request for building permit for addition of room in summer kitchen (80 sq. ft.) and the construction of a separate structure for motor vehicles and tractor used for lawn mowing and snow removal. ( approximately 1500 sq. ft.) Both the building and addition to conform with the character of the current structure built mid 1gth century. 3. List of neighbors from Carver County Property lnformation that fall within 500' of the property obtained and letter making aware the intentions of these additional structures on the property, lncluded elevation and location of the projects on the property included. 1 8 neighbors may fall within and 11 have responded to the attached request in a positive response regarding. 4. Discussion with staff at Chanhassen mentioned the possibility of not permitting the construction as requested due to possible use of the property as a construction site. This is not the intention of its use. This is a private residence where storage of vehicles and tractors and equipment for such tractors are for personal use, as well as collector vehicle. Options are to leave said vehicles on the driveway in the weather or store in the requested new building. 5. This home is a residential property used for residential purposes. No intent is for use as a commercial property to store outside construction items (machines, vehicles, building materials, etc. This would fall in accordance to the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Chanhassen. 6. As you approach this old structure with it's old indigenous stone front and Chaska brick construction you are taken back a bit, As the other small structures on the property you see that there is a consistency to preserve this look, The intent is to not build a steel pole barn of innocuous design, but one which as well will compliment the existing structures, at a considerable cost more that the common steel buildings so common throughout the city. There is nothing wrong with the steel pole barn, but for this property it would not be a pleasant view for those passing by, nor to fit with a possible consistency hopefully desired by those CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED DEC 31 2020 CHANHASSEN PI-AI'INING DEPT who accept and approve building structures, and keep with the Comprehensive PIan. Again, the addition and new structure are of l gth century design. 7. This property has historical significance and any additional structures are built to compliment the dates and architectural design of the time of the original construction. 8. Should the design not be approved by said committee and review board, a secondary option could be to add onto the house and connect to the existing garage. (This would provide with less than the 1000 square foot rule for needing a variance.) This would provide, as well the space needed for the vehicle and implements, although not in keeping with the historical aspect of the separate buildings so common in l9th century farmsteads. A poor choice in trying to keep the 1 gth century architectural appearance. 9. One option is to add onto the house and connect the existing garage with a connecting garage. This can be done, and be architecturally pleasing, but more accurate construction would be to have as the property had when occupied in the past as a farm with outer buildings. 10. The 80 square foot addition to the existing summer kitchen would be used as a bathroom for those using the summer kitchen, as well as when outdoor activities mostly gardening and yard maintenance are in season. The need for an addition is for the construction of a frost level to bring water into the building. A heated environment is obviously necessary to prevent the freezing of water in the winter months. To have a basement under the bath, for water protection and a root cellar is foremost to us in this case. 11 . The purchase of this property was for the enjoyment of gardening, and maintaining a classic structure. As many can see there is much to preserve, maintain and update to keep it in it's (close) original form. This is a pleasing property that the City of Chanhassen can be proud to have within its boundaries. Our fortune to have found and taken up the chore of doing this proves our stewardship is well meaning, family oriented and hopefully a prize for anyone who follows us in its f uture purchase. Ed Myslivecek 10151 Great Plains Blvd. Chaska, MN 55318 We have intended to install a bath in the summer kitchen for convenience of those using the building and for those working the gardens and the yard. The City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan appears to be one which allows citizens to build within the limitations of safety and cohesion to the look which the City desires. Building a structure that is regarded within the Chanhassen Comprehensive is the intent with our request. I would like to promote the property which has been in this city for almost '160 years. One of the oldest residences in Carver County. The aspect of maintaining the 18th Century appearance is important to this owner. The subject property was a farm started by the Vogel family from Silesia arriving in the mid 19th Century and obtaining the property via "squatting" as was popular to newcomers in the midwest when the U.S. Government was promoting and populating of this area. So with a Military Bound Lands Patent issued by Abraham Lincoln on July 1 , 1861 it became property of August Vogel, who built and lived in this stone and Chaska brick structure. Brothers Franz (Frank) and Joseph as well purchased adjoining lands. The land was worked as a farm by the Vogels and after the early 1900's by the Teich family. Prior to the purchase by the Arndt's in the early 1990's the structures fell into disrepair and after purchased by Walt and Chris Ann Arndt malor refurbishing was accomplished. They brought it back to its original (or close to) stature. Many of the farm outbuildings fell from disrepair or by them demolished before falling on their own. One foundation is being preserved by us to the barn that fell in the ought years, called "the ruins". With the "blood , sweat and tears" spilled by the Arndt's, as they said, to make this place exhibited the looks of its origin it is only my contention to continue this preservation and add from the outside appearance whattTy OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED DEC 31 2020 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPI After speaking with employees of the city I learned that the fear of a "construction building" come to mind of those who permit a new building/ garage on existing property. This I assure is not the intention and would be a scar on the site as it currently sits. As mentioned above, preserving the 19th century look and a clean site to board vehicles and implements used on the property is foremost in mind. (Pictures of neighbors. A, A and B attached) This may be the type of site that the City is hoping will not occur and is not compatible with the Comprehensive Plan. (Picture of current status of parking and vehicle storage C, C an D attached) Constructing a barn to house existing vehicles, etc. is to conceal and clean up the congestion of outdoor stored vehicles and save on the cost of inside storage to others. (Picture of original site E, F, G, and H attached) This is the site prior to the Arndt's arrival and reconditioning of the site, Barns were throughout, and accessory outbuildings. The construction of requested building and addition would not bring back this cacophony of farm structures, and would house the vehicles stored outside currently. Note: "H" is approximate location of new garage structure request where barn from "G" is shown-north side of property. Topographical lines are noted on site drawing from county source. Note: A required survey will be provided once approval of construction for permit is granted. would be seen by a passer by in the mid 19th century. The outbuilding / barn/ garage that could possibly have been constructed and used in that time is our request at this time. Thus submitted to you is the plan of such a structure that would add to the conformity I assume the City of Chanhassen comprehensive Plan would find pleasant in appearance and add to the historic value of this site. (Sec. 20-58 General conditions for granting # 1 and # 5) Current structure (Picture of existing house and summer kitchen I and J attached) When submitting for a permit I found a variance may be needed which constitutes extra costs. As well the need for storing vehicles, tractor equipment and collector vehicles a new barn/garage will be needed. Because of the square footage limitations on outbuildings to the primary living structure a variance would be needed for this structure as well. The decision to request both at the same time makes better use of time. building costs and resources. After drawings were made for the addition on the summer kitchen and the new barn/garage structure a letter of note was mailed to each neighbor within the 500' required distance for their perusal. I requested their signature identifying a position of response indicating approval from their point of view as a neighbor to proceed with the projects. (Signed letters attached) Relative to section 20-58 "General conditions for granting.... 1) As noted above this request is for an addition and structure that is in harmony with the existing structure and promoting the historical content that Chanhassen has to offer the community. 2) Practical needs for vehicle and tractor storage belay reason for personal storage needs. And to mediate outside vehicle congestion on the property. containing said vehicles in the current garage is physically impossible. Renting space for vehicles in outside locations is not as secure as wished. (Ihis is believed to be consistent with the future Comprehensive Plans desired by the city.) Alternative plans are to build a structure connecting the house to the existing garage, albeit, this would be unusual for a site with the mid 19th century style as is currently being reflected. Adding onto existing garage would be difficult considering the grades to the nodh and east. Solar installation is not within the request and is thus not applicable for this variance request 3) Applicant is focused on building not with the cheapest product or practice but just the antithesis to build for longevity and structural harmony for the site. 4) There is no plight which requires the structures construction, only compliment to the site as mentioned. Strong consideration by the occupant to keep the site within the natural aspect of the 19th century "look" and architecture is paramount. Because of these considerations the city requires a variance for neighbor feedback. (see returned letters from neighbors, above) 5) As stated, correctly, this construction will not alter the essential character, but add to the value within the city. Subjective decisions are the right and reserye of those making decisions and trust must be implied with the intentions of the owner to fit into the comprehensive plan. 6) Not applicable to this case Attachment "K" and "L" are elevations of summer kitchen with addition as viewed from the north and west respectively. "M" is the elevation approximately of the new garage structure. (attached) "N" property location to new Hwy 101 (attached) (Norte: see "H" for more accurate locations. This illustrates where the new driveway will be going because fo the new Hwy 101 construction. "O" and "P" attached, is location of proposed addition and building on site Q are floor plans of requested construction. R shows parcel as it sits in northeast corner of 101 and Creekwood Drive Letters "S" through "2" are photos of Chanhassen properties that look to fit the request of outbuilding/garages that are complimentary to the main home/structures on their property. This is the intent of our request. A plan "8" if needed will be one to build the necessary garage structure as an attachment from the house to the existing garage, which would be more difficult to blend with authentic design, but possible. Thus the hope for approval for the external structure and bath addition is foremost. a F CHANHASSE N ECEIVED c3t2020 PI.AiINIIJG DETT . .1')9.'I \ 4- ,6--*- i,:1, i i&*rr hEsE- A,laiq ;rlr 7 q n{i I -;{ A From Subiect Date To Ed lrysllv€cgl edSlhandyfi]asieri.rc.ccn, Contractor barn December 15, 2020 at 6:47 PM Ed Myslivecek edm,lslrvecek'Jgrnaii.c.rl @ { !I 1,,t' ' ,, t :i'a'f: ':-a'n'{, -ftssw2 'b,..'il , t I *.d' m.."",,J. " At L- t -aF EPre,. t ,- ..1 n r:eh=- I _ El i ta ,,+ i ''l'a F.omr Ed t ysllv€cat edclhandymasteflnc coin !, Subiect Yard 2 Date: October 27, 2020 al*22 PM To: Ed Myslivecek edmyslrvecek3rgmail.conl CITY OF CHAIIHASSEN RECEIVED DEC 3l 2020 CIIAI'Jf IISSEN PI.AI{NING DEPI t,\c T I t' I ri \l.-l I -r.n: rt @ L I I I From: Ed lrysllvecek edehandymastennc conr a, Subiect Van outside Date: fttober 27, 2020 at 8:23 PM To: Ed M)€livecek edmysliveaek.ilgfi al.ccnl GD /I r;_--l E. ' -'<.'' -4 - E- ,- r-1t-=--- - hilrr -! -r,r Fom Subiecl Date To Ed lryollv€cGk ed3handymaslernc com, Trucks in drive D€cembe|I4, 2020 at 7:49 PM Ed M)€lNec€k eomyshveceqa omarl.ccnr c @ IR7-V E E--:r!i f \D- /- \ / r# -'.-<---G t: t B *..-..-*-', Faom Subiect Date To Ed lrysllvgcgk edohandymasiei.c ccm , Cars outside October 27, 2020 at 8:23 PM Ed Ml6livec€k eomysl.\ ecet 3grrari .cr"' P a .-a. ''.. ..1 , 'Qf t * G. i&". ii.' {rt t *,..t .{ .r-. ,ll ,. !i\-_ "d' I _# @ w I t{ t. rl'l r't-4l*f,-:ir!r!\6 \ :. A Y6,t _-. III \ , a j I ,I*i t]$,,1 \J ty' )r I ZI # \t d im,.,hu: . tal t :::- I :,4 a : I 7 il # : ?I -t 4{ I I IFrom: Eat tlirallyrcek ed,Ohandymaslerinc.com, Subi€ctr 10151 Oate: Dember 14, 2020 al 8:21 PM To: Ed Mysliv€cek edmyslivecek@gmail.com @ .i li I I .; I t-. n tl )t nd! Faom Subject Date To Ed iryallvecek +d .slhandy,.nasl Cottage December 14, 2020 at 8:20 PM Ed Myslivecek ecmyslivecekag o J * Ig IfilJ t4 5 F.om: Ed ilyslivecek edohandlmasiennc com , Subject G2 Datei No\€mber 15. 2020 at 1:58 PM Toi Ed Myslivecek edmysli,,ecekeg.najl.com m f, i'!! ,..1 ,11, t{/ $ fi t a !,"tl {t *---'--* a, a - @ t) \t a\ $ {. I \ 5t s 0 B ,i*l._rrn ."{rt t.,,%: ,,: Ii- L. 4 a \ B t.z From Subiect Date To rdymaste :58 PM ?cek@grI Ed W8livecek ed( Not/ember '15, 2020 Ed Myslivecek edm tna at1 0 hn il.) $\ A\ R \a \ T *t,fl - -E h---*- E F- @ ,L/ From Subiect Date To Ed Wslivecek ede handy,nasternc co:I l, G4 Nolember 15, 2020 at 1:59 PM Ed Myslivecek edmyshvecekGrgmart.com @ I \^s + $ , .J \, t-J \ * I I E I -&-a- Faom Subject Date To Ed t y3llvac€k edohandymastennc.cont , G5 November 15, 2020 at 1:59 PM Ed Myslivecek edmys,ivecekrslgmail.conl @ '}{!d \} T c { ,!nIt I )I 4I.,,,tlP. .., .': f;l I 3 , n tI<t-.',, #v.^. -. # a { -r.) ,,1 +, |tu ) --*. ., -at *tr q*-* -a-v a ^L ttr ,.. rl * V/ F.om Subject Oate To Ed Wdlv€cek ederhandymasiennc.co.r, November 15. 2020 at 2:00 PM Ed Myslivecek edmyslrvecek<rcrnail.conl I t i.,t tr !. II r t, J \ J it s nv $ \tt .i 1r I,7 7 I , I ,i &I^ , ,,t1 J \* I I:f r &i ' ti';' ' l' ,t ,l - .tt ; -' #r* 77 {. @ \^ N e N \\ @ \) $\i I J s\ I ,) IFrom: Ed irysllvecol edChandymaslerinc.cc.n, Sutiect: GB Date: November 15,2020 at2:01 PM To: Ed Myslivecek .dmyslrvecek: gr,ar .r!-r: J,I fIt-.-, I V tt * I t -i -)F.,1 rl r'l tl I t F-t-- l i 1 E i E YFrom Subiect Date To Ed iryslivecek ed@handymaslerinc.com C, November 15, 2020 at 2:02 PM Ed Myslivecek ednystivecek'Sgnart.ccm @ "i, I *l, It t, lr _ ,,. a , 8'r; ' 'r.', r lI;r' r ' ^. .q+':l =.',F 't", i f2 4 I -/ I .t ; -. ,.. -J l'rtlal&:+ ; I Z From: Ed ilysllvacek ed3handymaster;nc com , Subiect: G10 Date: November 15.2020 at2:03 PM Tor Ed Myslivecek edmyslivecekelgmarl.com @ n,)i. I.,:'1. l$g$,: $4' i. si r: ?_ II) --* ffii t f 5- -J I -a a +NOIV ]tl H]-UoNNOt-U00v y100uH-IVS \t>iol2.; -Ee Er3E:E6< Pdau n;!E EEEE!e'eE! E EEE E;.EE(T EE I5;I EEE:IEeliei,. EEEE:E FE tr;FE alt!tHzl =la)l EI ulJI -t<l uiol t I rI Ez E} .). Ea (t(\!t \n _! dS"2 / 89 s! s:I ts6 e 6 =o-I r99 Nfi 'NfSSVHtWtu0A'18 SNMId IVftfJ r9t0rY\UVJ HCU]d ]NO]S:801 0lsodoud o0-]Ll5 fE .t-J .s-,t , e a? E ,0-,1 O oo NOtlVAftS lsli^NOI.LIOOV l^lOO8H1V8 !il8TE99 N}I 'ITSSYHNYH'o '18 sNMld .tvjlp r9r0rt,luv_l HSuld :Nol_s:uol (modoud_I:7pi eEEE:Esl E;t E :.iE; EEE EEer221i4=ETEFtEtrlrJfe Ea EiE: IE;ii5 Ee s 6aEIIEE6d EE I;EE w.FC2 zC F =d. z (-: E. ai! trl-4 I I :--l : __l-- t:llo+i,l zc tr I ( ILt.I i T ! I \ 9 NOtlV^J'tlNOTI|OOV dOHS)t80,r=isi rEEE:ErE 3zzd i9l\ irI r EEE BE snE: EEE E !; ! EEI Ei *t;3 qE;;EE iE;E: E EE E;ES r-lOIzl =lol FI<i il -l<lel(JJI 2., (Jl 9 a 22 !* JE EE 5 7 I =CL grcss Nfi 'NSVHNYHS0 18 SNftnd lV3tC r9r0rY\UVI H3U]d ]NOIS:lol o:so&8d o EILLT o-8!C99 Nt{ 'I€SSVHNVH3o 18 SNrV'ld IVIUC tqlorr!UV! HCU]d :NO].S:rnl olsodoud o t)+Nor-tv l'tl:N0r1t00v doHs)tuo,t\ a : 2=e IEEE :p=\ i;iz EEE E Esp E! EEIE*oEPXq EE;!gE ErurlJP E!EE;E EE;; EE aoz. zo e z(,p 6 9G ie ?6 8E eF Yti 92E= v6 2_ i I ;,Ii ]LII : =: = == = == = = : = =7: =: =: =--.J a-t_ J /- 7 =: =: =: = : =: = = =:: = = ==: =: _ ==: =: =a: =: ; = =: = = : =: = = = o t 10151 Great Plains Blvd Chaska, M 55318 Square footage of buildings on site: Main House: 7450 (2 floors) Summer Kitchen: 456 Shed: 200 Garage: 728 Total sq. ft: 2834 Addition: bath 76 sq ft Garage: 1382 crr{ o{EcJlt$$ASSEN DEC 3 1 2020 fitAllHASSBl PLlNtllts sPf Ed Myslivecek 10151 Great Plains Blvd. Chaska, MN 55318 September 30,2020 Heidi and I are considering an additional garage to build on our property to house our vehicles. The City of Chanhassen requires that we notify - neighbors that are within 500 feet of our property to alert and get approval of a project like this. A variance is required where we will have to buy signage form the city to post for the public to see as well. The garage that we are proposing is approximately 4g x 32 feet in floor dimension and to be placed north of the existing garage. lt wiil be praced properly as required from the bluff and property lines. We intend to construct it of wood framing with a siding to match existing buildings on the property. As well we intend to add an 8 x 10' addition to the "summer kitchen,, thatyou see on the driveway. Both of these will be presented to the city and with said variance posted on the property. My intent is to let you, our neighbor, know what we intend to do and as foryour approval to present to the city in recourse. As you can see in the attached 1): location on the property, 2): addition location of the garage and addition to the summer kitchen. Would you please mark the attached note of approval if you find no negative issue in obstruction or other issue to your propefty from this construction. We are grateful for your participation and help to us in getting appro$fiY OFECHANHASSEII from the city for this project. DEC 3l 2020 CH,rt'{HASSEt't pWlUrc DET And with best regards, Please return in the stamped envelope. As a neighbor and property owner ad.joining to Ed Myslivecek and Heidi Abramovich at '101 51 Great Plains Blvd, Chaska, MN 55919, we find no reason that the enclosed project would have a negative affect to us and find the city to approve of said prolect. Signatu re date Sig nature date Address: Please return in the stamped envelope. As a neighbor and property owner adjoining to Ed Mysrivecek and Heidi Abramovich at 10151 Great plains Blvd, ChLska, MN 5531g, we find no reason that the enclosed project would have a negative affect to us andfind the city to approve of said project. sig nature dale -v,; -/-'r1a,)O Sig nature date Address: Tom and Kathy Gertz 10001 Great Plains Blvd. Chaska, MN 55318 9466 r(I /1 L IlJ I 'l/ .+t}" 1 ,,)\J IJ 4 /.a\t a :t, /it't Please return in the stamped envelope. As a neighbor and property owner adjoining to Ed Myslivecek and Heidi Abramovich at 1015'1 Great Plains Blvd, Chaska, MN 55919, we find no reason that the enclosed project would have a negative affect to us and find the city to approve of said project. sig natu re 'our. !129, ii^a *r) date 1. ..iSignature Address: Daniel and Catherine Schaitberger 10241 Mandan Circle Chaska, MN 55318 Please return in the stamped envelope. As a neighbor and property owner adjoining to Ed Myslivecek and Heidi Abramovich at 101 51 Great Plains Blvd, Chaska, MN 5531g, we find no reason that the enclosed project would have a negative affect to us and find the city to approve of said project. 3 z\)Lv date iCtS r' jo Sig nature Sig natu re Address: Chris and Crystal Knutson 575 flakota Lane Chaska, MN 55318 9455 .4 ,,7L,,UL/',.1, Please return in the stamped envelope. Signatu re As a neighbor and property owner adjoining to Ed Myslivecek and HeidiAbramovich at 1015't Great prains Brvd, chiaska, Mr\i s5318, we find noreason that the encrosed project would have a negative affect to us andfind the city to approve of said project. date '7''=,'-7crZ6 date IZLSignat Address: Jim and Bonnie Swansen 615 Lakota Lane Chaska, MN 55318 z,/ 5 (=r-er^ L/ Please return in the stamped envelope. As a neighbor and property owner adjoining to Ed Myslivecek and Heidi Abramovich at 10151 Great Plains Blvd, Chaska, MN 55318, we find no reason that the enclosed prolect would have a negative affect to us and find the city to approve of said project. Signature G t-| [ ,1'/Z) a 66i,s /a'/ -1 o sig nature date lo- l-zo Address: Gary and Debra Anderson 725 Creekwood Chaska, MN 55318-9261 Please return in the stamped envelope. As a neighbor and property owner adjoining to Ed Myslivecek and Heidi Abramovich at .l 0'151 Great Plains Blvd, Chaska, MN 55318, we find no reason that the enclosed project would have a negative affect to us and find the city to approve of said project. Signatu re date / ( -7-ac Signature Address: Jeff and Kathy Dypwick 10300 Great Plains Blvd, Chaska, MN 55318 9467 .*.lI..date 1-{.,- Please return in the stamped envelope. As a neighbor and propefi owner adjoining to Ed Myslivecek and Heidi Abramovich at 101 51 Great Plains Blvd, Chaska, MN 553.18, we find no reason that the enclosed proiect would have a negative affect to us and find the city to approve of said project. Sig nature date n/_X1 sig nature Paluucia \ N"^0\"".q-adate 4 *Joa 4'c Address: Richard and Patricia Halver '10271 Great Plains Blvd. Chaska, MN 55318 Please return in the stamped envelope. As a neighbor and property owner adjoining to Ed Myslivecek and Heidi Abramovich at 10-151 Great Plains Blvd, Chaska, MN 55319, we find no reason that the enclosed project would have a negative affect to us and find the city to approve of said project. Sig nature date tD -+-)oso Sig nature date Address: Helen C. Link ParcellD #25849002A Please return in the stamped envelope. As a neighbor and property owner adjoining to Ed Myslivecek and Heidi Abramovich at 101 5'1 Great Plains Blvd, Chaska, MN 55318, we find no reason that the enclosed project would have a negative affect to us and find the city to approve of said project. Signatu Signature Address: John and Cathy Schwanke 595 Lakota Lane Chaska, MN 553.1 8 date date .-Q Please return in the stamped envelope. As a neighbor and property owner adjoining to Ed Myslivecek and Heidi Abramovich at 1015'1 Great Plains Blvd, Chaska, MN 55318, we find no reason that the enclosed project would have a negative affect to us and find the city to approve of said project. Sig nature sig nature date l:L Address: Blake and Alyssa Walz 100813 Great Plains BIvd Chaska, MN 55318 i Please return in the stamped envelope. As a neighbor and property owner adjoining to Ed Myslivecek and Heidi Abramovich at 10151 Great Plains Blvd, Chaska, MN 55318, we find no reason that the enciosed project wouid have a negative afiect to us and find the city to approve of said pro sig nature date aZc Signatu date Address: Heather and Francisco Silva 565 Lakota Lane Chaska, MN.55318 Memorandum To: MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner From: Matt Unmacht, Water Resources Coordinator CC: Charles Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer Ryan Pinkalla, Water Resources Technician Erik Henricksen, Project Engineer Date: January 21, 2021 Re: 10151 Great Plains Boulevard Variance - City Planning Case No. 2021-08 The Water Resources Department has reviewed variance request located at 10151 Great Plains Boulevard. These comments are divided into two categories: general comments and proposed conditions. General comments are informational points to guide the applicant in the proper planning of any water resources issues or stormwater infrastructure fo r this project, to inform the applicant of possible extraordinary issues and/or to provide the basis for findings. Proposed conditions are requirements that Water Resources recommends be formally imposed on the applicant in the final order. General Comments/Findings 1. The applicant is requesting variances, including exceeding the 1,000-square foot, detached accessory structure size limit, construction of a detached garage and adding a bathroom to an existing detached structure on a property located at 10151 Great Plains Boulevard. The applicant has submitted application material to the City. 2. The primary issue identified by Water Resources staff as part of this variance review is the presence of a basin, which appears to show wetland characteristics. The applicant is proposing to place an accessory structure very close to this basin. 3. This basin has some characteristics indicating that it could potentially being man-made. As such, Water Resources staff reviewed the property for the presence of historic wetlands. This review is important to complete in order to understand the historical context of wetlands on a site and how they should be managed. 4. A review for historical wetlands helps identify if an area with wetland characteristics has historically been a wetland area and thus should be governed by the Wetland Conservation Act or if it should be considered incidental, that is, it was a created wetland in an upland area. Three factors are typically used to determine if a wetland is incidental: aerial imagery, soil data, and antecedent precipitation. 5. City staff has reviewed these three factors. Aerial photos were reviewed from years 1937, 1951, 1957, 1963, 1969, 1979, 1991, 1997, 2000, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2008, 2010, 2011, 2013, 2014, 2016, 2017, and 2020. These photos show that a structure, similar to the one being proposed by the applicant, was present in the area in question going all the way back to 1937. This structure was removed sometime between 2005 and 2008. After 2008, a circular basin can been seen which appears to hold water. It appears this basin likely exists due to the demolition of the previous structure. As a result, given the factors listed above, it is unlikely that this area was historically a wetland. T he City’s full aerial photo review and antecedent precipitation analysis are available upon request. 6. The National Resource Conservation Service’s Web Soil Survey shows that the area in question consists of Lester-Kilkenny complex soils, with have a 0% hydric rating. This means this area does not contain hydric soils, and thus is further evidence that this wetland area was created from an upland area. 7. As for other water resources issues: there are no other wetlands or streams on this property. In addition, this project does not involves any City owned stormwater infrastructure. As such, there are no concerns or conditions to place on the project based on these conditions. 8. Based on City staff’s review of aerial imagery, soil data, and antecedent precipitation, it is the opinion of the Water Resources Department that this variance request can be granted in accordance with the requirements of the Chanhassen Code of Ordinances (as it pertains to Water Resources requirements) and City Standards, provided it fully addresses the comments and conditions contained herein, if applicable, and can be approved. Proposed Conditions 1. There are no proposed conditions associated with a review by the Water Resources department. Given the proximity to steep slopes and bluff areas which ultimately lead to Bluff Creek, extra care and review will be undertaken during the building permit process to ensure that proper erosion and sediment control measures are undertaken during construction. CITY OF CHANHASSEN STATE OF MINNESOTA) (ss cor.JNTY OF CARVER ) I, Kim T. Meuwissen, being first duly swom, on oath deposes that she is and was on Jantary 21,2021, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk ofthe City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy ofthe attached notice ofa Public Hearing to consider a request for variances, including exceeding the 1,O00-square foot, detached accessarT structure size limit, to construct a detached garage and adding a bathroom to an existing detached structure on a property located at 10151 Great Plains Boulevard. Zoned Agricultural Estate (A2), Planning Case No. 2021-08 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy ofsaid notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses ofsuch owners were those appearing as such by the records ofthe County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesot4 and by other appropriate records. Kim T eu n, Deputy Cl (Seal) JEAI{ M SIECKLTT{G i Subscribed and tti*Q [6laa, o S m to before me ,2021. Notary Public nGyPttfoemloom r|rtrSIlA,rco. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE Subject Parcel DllcLlm.r This map is neilher a legally reco.ded map nor a suNey and as not inlended to be used a3 one. Th6 map is a @tnprlaton ot recods, informalion and data located in vatio!3 city, county. staie and federal offces and other sources r€gardin! the a.ea 3ho m, and is to be used for lebrence purp€es only. The CiV doe3 not t€rrant that the Geoglaphic ln ormaton System (GlS) Oata used to prepaE this map are enor free. and the City does nol represont tl:tt tlE Gls Data can be used to. navEatonal, tracking oa any o$er purpoce equinng exacting fireasurement of distance or diectoo or p.ecision in the dedciion of geogaphic bafules. The preceding disdaimet i9 provialed puBuant to Minnesota Statl,Ites y66.03, Subd. 21 (20m), and the user of this map acknowtedoes tEt lhe City rhall not be liable for any damag€., and e)9ressly waives all claims, and agEes to debnd, indemnify, and hold hatmless the Ci9 fro.n any ard all claim3 b.ooght by User. it5 ernployees or aleots, or lhird panjes wttici alise out of lhe usefs access or use of data plovided. Dbchtnar Thb mep is neither a legally Ecorded map nor e sudey and is nol inlended to be lrsed as one. Thi6 map is a comF,ilalion ot reco.ds. inlo.matoo and data located in vadqjs oty, county, state and federal ofice3 and other sources reoarding the area 3hoen, aM is lo be used for reblence purposes onv. The Cily does rlot warant that the Geo06phic lnformaton SFlem (GlS) Oata used to pEpare this map ale eror tree, aM the City does nol represent thal the GIS Oata can be used lor navi€atonal, tracling oa any olher purposo requidno o€ctno mea3uemenl of distance or direclion or precision in the depitlion of g€o€raphic ,eatrEs. The preceding dirdainler is provirod pu6uant to Minn6ota StraMes Y66.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of thi3 map acknowledges fBt f|e City shall not be liaue ior any damages. and expressly waives all daims, and a€re€a to debnd, indemnify. and hold harml€ss the Cily frorn any and all daims brought by U3er, its employees or agents, o. third pani€J wttach atu6 out of the uscfs access or u9e of data povided tTAX_NAMEI <TAX_ADD_LI l (TAX ADD L2) sNext RccordrrTAX_NAMET <TAX_ADD_LI r rTAX_ADD_L2r I L_ s r, F l!0 t 4 i Subiect Parcel tT I I \:, l,o {)EOEP ;<o- 0,'C^EEgE Ao cr, = ga =:6I 9-:i :i;E -.5 sEln o x (,€sEaBeEE:EHES EE EEEEiE;IgE;g:g_sEgq65 9cE Y.9q< = (, > o, ^ ; 9E=;38 E FogXE=ah'E SEgTfiEEFE E $€'a. " ". i e 3l Bx-g =5 EI=EE€E iiaiBlsiiiE 6EEEc.r3FpEOc!5H3F- .9(uENgo-,Noj-.9NC oo _o-o)-t!bj6(5= E- Of.fs ol(l)tolEIolol()lclelol6tflE E c(, (E coi: ;a; ol= o<Fe9or 5.= N O>E 3* E9 -o+iDiio(l)cE CBE :' t, U)f CE_EM$E,i8tsfiB I9,,Ho !u i'= o 6ij(E-! O)-iExH€85xC'.iOE,^ iSeEbEes€59E9eE EflEEE';o ! xro 5:;HP ID o =!t! oogoopE(!o>2lgoBid)oaE OOd"q!Cl(EO EEoE 'i, 3 5-ef< iEiEiiiislisiiii iiiiiiilliiliEia 3 E I ii) ar ,= =d,fi-(,!! ,c =r .5 ..o9CEoo o>OE:oo(J U;ot,co)CDog)oEO(D .nEgEE:gLo.Ea6oo0)i- -c -.'Evr}Qol;RAg;(, Looo o- E;'Eo o,b'6 (56 clt corXq 9E; tl., - Eo=;E6b zsfr )cc 6E*a u; .= 3Y= H [3 o i: oo a, oo Eo o(,oJ ::i!oo(l.oo t!o c!.L >EEO!,Eo- i! E! E.troo=EDOc,.=a2E.e tro F llJ- E IIJ.e 6= =oo= ED7a.= 6E =go r! i.Erqi B,ooEEos(.) CDc c,o = P.E 9 G I'Fo = llJ- E IIJo EE = o..€olzdP5 o cF * EU'iE5: E'oo GE G o 'Ee .e3 -BEorcig ts3 F- .g oE c.r go--Nor-.EalE>9 E3 A. o, '= TLEj-so=E- c)< .:t g olCI rDtolcl ololol clot rDl (t)l i Ei o) o c {nrI6 I o= o<F! Pg E- E S* E9 -.o+oooll)qr 3 or Er.=6.=.=E - o(rl E f,EEa8Efi E I9,,ko !o i = o 66Oar Or5i*tr:EE Xo--!!i,i BttEg.E99E EflEEE E8 h 6E83i e& ooo E UJ o -goc!E o p*(!o e; 6PElooEc-(gg E.e -A6.lgE oE b3 5.e eEi fr -E !? a 0619 1-o-c- ti ogEE *- E :EE .I$ Et-o o: o€ E q,r 8;9 E:E! *&5€ E HEEggEE; aiseHgEfl EgBF=+EE-is;!HEEF so o-o-o-c d-o =F O (! OF N (t { = t^t oJitQ L rl q X- e =E El=EE€E EgiEgIEi;EEg gE*lcBsgEiEE 9Bt|iiIEEiBE o oo d,'d -o rl) B oo =o-gl_c EBooo!-o lD,t EEo6ac 8E -t->: !, r:ccoo, uft cc'=(EE-c_u 6q-Y>o<8l ,/i(! E'c C' CD([ CDc (, o) Ec o) 3 c .o ooE oE o o Ego o E o)o ()o E o o-lc .s,a =uJz 5 E 3I E E ! E E E 8 c _!9 iit F c6 a, t!o .9 o(, oJ G6otto o- G(, >Et.9 o-Geto-J 26 Gt .: +'E r!E =; c6 ..o9caoo o=q,Efoo() ooor'{ooOOooOOOOO6 - c\.l.{ oO (O O 6l Cr t'r N .{ O O O)-oocrloooool 000!A.roc.r66.r,60mO(nOOOfnOOrn Fr ..r lrl o o rn or !n o (o \o \o !a oN rn.n.! N (\ N <l N <l o o an o.,lO r{ ..r O F{ d O cO O 6 16.n O.n.iZ r,) rn !n ral u) Ltl L^ rn .n ral r/) rn !n !n rnE a! a! ^r N N a! N a{ N N r\l a\r a\l a\l N F.(o(o (., ch dt F@ m or;rIl rO (!' (.c' (ON rn^<tN+<r <r sr <l .J.^<.xi .{(oq9 q9 ? 9ijf ?ca 6 6 ao co 6 ao (n m @ rr 6 @ @ @- - -i .i .i .r - u) La Fi.l r{ .i !.. dm m an ar.| rn an m !n l,l (n :{ m (n (n mrn rn u) rr) !n (^ I^ -, ra = rn Ln.n ut!n r^ rn rn !/l !,1 tn = = ln .li L/) r^ !^ rrl.rzzzzzzzz2ztrlzzzz 3;;;';';-aaEEa>dddd = \2 t !z :Z V Y }z O O !a,'!z !z sz :zt1 tt\ t^ th !z Y (^ = t\ t^ u\ v1 AIIIIII-IIIO--II; (J o U (J (J (J (J IA o (J T! (J U (J (J ooo6000 co6dldlao@dt_? eth vl qt r^ tt\ tt1 tt1 =^ d. o^zzzzzzz*e E do oE dd.dd-d3Ez=PP9ii k k k k k E k 3=ie::9 p ."E E H.'H H U Y H 5 X; f > EE::H:::3f=x=HH=r-rij i- U i iri i- 6 o) + J H o u a oX 6 6 6 r{ N a{ rrl m N O O O rn O O< 6 0 c, o o o o N co <l @ N N rn l'\ F: F{ Fr F{ F{ r'l .{ Fl F.r .i l'rl(O\OF (pOr 6000004d, al! dl d! ao d, altul .Jl \rl .h tt\ t l tl)zzzzzzzo-o-o-do-o-o-FFFFFFFr! r! uJ r! ur ru [!d,td,d,G,d,c,Q(,(,(,(,(,(,(,9.<.rmr{r{..roaOF.6!r)r/)F-OPOOOHNa{mEOOOOOOO(^ .r -r .{ Ft F{ r.l f{ ; Ez. 3o6=a> -d,E:z=<ffo !2 6 -zt e- 3 a 6zi 6q z 9,,2H= a zd. H EEIE .=i=Eg=t=E5:=$EEE;Y=i?'adi;:=2aaq >,= E _i I E E E Z4;1;!aE -{E3J6EgEE5=t=338 oao55 26ooE=E3E:<B=3<OuJr!r!Et rrJ uJ r! (9 i(Ju(JBooo1/r0<fNl'\a{Orrl F. (O F .r CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 22, 2021 Subject 2021 Building Permit Activity January Year To Date Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: L.1. Prepared By Bob Generous, Senior Planner File No: ATTACHMENTS: 2021 Building Permit Activity January YTD CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 22, 2021 Subject Review of Claims Paid 02222021 Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: L.2. Prepared By Kelly Strey, Interim Finance Director File No: SUMMARY The following claims are submitted for review on February 22, 2021: Check Numbers Amounts 174934 – 175024 $339,835.33 ACH Payments $262,426.49 Total All Claims $602,261.82 ATTACHMENTS: Check Summary Check Summary ACH Check Detail Check Detail ACH Accounts Payable User: Printed: dwashburn 2/12/2021 10:16 AM Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount MNLABO MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 01/29/2021 0.00 100.00174934 ALLSTR ALLSTREAM 02/04/2021 0.00 490.84174935 BLAMAN Blackburn Manufacturing Company 02/04/2021 0.00 999.52174936 CENENE CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 02/04/2021 0.00 88.49174937 EmbMinn CENTURYLINK 02/04/2021 0.00 1,867.11174938 CITEDE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 02/04/2021 0.00 453.97174939 ComMin Compass Minerals America, Inc 02/04/2021 0.00 6,502.33174940 EDETRA EDEN TRACE CORPORATION 02/04/2021 0.00 2,500.00174941 FACMOT FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 02/04/2021 0.00 92.83174942 FerEnt Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 02/04/2021 0.00 2,850.67174943 ferwat Ferguson Waterworks #2518 02/04/2021 0.00 3,406.26174944 FreeJen Jennifer Freehauf 02/04/2021 0.00 140.00174945 GREMEA GREEN MEADOWS INC 02/04/2021 0.00 880.00174946 GYMWOR GYM WORKS INC 02/04/2021 0.00 400.00174947 hach Hach Company 02/04/2021 0.00 3,153.43174948 HOOTHREA HOOPS AND THREADS LLC 02/04/2021 0.00 34.00174949 LOFGHEAT LOFGREN HEATING & A/C 02/04/2021 0.00 48.26174950 MBEInc MBE Inc 02/04/2021 0.00 2,640.00174951 MetGar Metro Garage Door Company 02/04/2021 0.00 525.75174952 MNTRAN MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 02/04/2021 0.00 254.92174953 MNPOL MN Pollution Control Agency 02/04/2021 0.00 55.00174954 MWOA MN Wastewater Operator Assn 02/04/2021 0.00 60.00174955 MusoJose Joseph Musolf 02/04/2021 0.00 74.99174956 NORPOW NORTHWESTERN POWER EQUIP CO 02/04/2021 0.00 7,691.74174957 SIEGCHAR CHARLES SIEGLE 02/04/2021 0.00 425.00174958 sioval Sioux Valley Environmental 02/04/2021 0.00 1,270.00174959 ShaMde SMSC Organics Recycling Facility 02/04/2021 0.00 407.52174960 TayEle Taylor Electric Company, LLC 02/04/2021 0.00 1,170.00174961 TFOFIN TFORCE FINAL MILE 02/04/2021 0.00 55.43174962 VeoEnv Veolia Environmental Services 02/04/2021 0.00 45.97174963 WastMana Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 02/04/2021 0.00 807.77174964 ABCCLE ABC Cleaning, LLC 02/11/2021 0.00 115.00174965 ASPMIL ASPEN MILLS 02/11/2021 0.00 1,196.99174966 UB*02149 HELEN ATKINSON 02/11/2021 0.00 7.95174967 BCATRA BCA 02/11/2021 0.00 30.00174968 UB*02161 ALEXANDER & KIM BOONE MORTENSEN02/11/2021 0.00 36.34174969 BORSTA BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 02/11/2021 0.00 64.96174970 UB*02163 PETER & DEANNA BRANDT 02/11/2021 0.00 75.71174971 UB*02164 CARVER COUNTY ABSTRACT & TITLE CO02/11/2021 0.00 151.08174972 CarCouPa Carver County Parks 02/11/2021 0.00 82.50174973 CENENE CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 02/11/2021 0.00 5,570.23174974 CenLin CenturyLink 02/11/2021 0.00 64.00174975 UB*02156 CHAD & MICHELLE CHESSEN 02/11/2021 0.00 60.99174976 ComMin Compass Minerals America, Inc 02/11/2021 0.00 9,163.49174977 CROCOL CROWN COLLEGE 02/11/2021 0.00 4,350.00174978 CUBFOO CUB FOODS 02/11/2021 0.00 14.46174979 UB*02150 VICKI & JASON DEGENSTEIN 02/11/2021 0.00 55.19174980 Page 1AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (2/12/2021 10:16 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount UB*02155 EDINA REALTY TITLE 02/11/2021 0.00 10.59174981 UB*02158 EDINA REALTY TITLE 02/11/2021 0.00 32.68174982 UB*02160 ETHAN ERINAKES 02/11/2021 0.00 103.15174983 UB*02159 EXCECUTIVE TITLE SERVICES 02/11/2021 0.00 14.18174984 FerEnt Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 02/11/2021 0.00 509.03174985 ferwat Ferguson Waterworks #2518 02/11/2021 0.00 9,025.55174986 FlePri FleetPride, Inc.02/11/2021 0.00 81.14174987 FORDGARY GARY FORD 02/11/2021 0.00 595.00174988 GRABAR GRAYBAR 02/11/2021 0.00 45.12174989 INDSCH INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST 112 02/11/2021 0.00 5,492.72174990 Loc49 IUOE Local #49 02/11/2021 0.00 700.00174991 JAGCOM Jaguar Communications Inc 02/11/2021 0.00 53.60174992 JoneDavi David Jones 02/11/2021 0.00 50.00174993 UB*02151 ALEXANDER & KARENEA LAI 02/11/2021 0.00 64.86174994 UB*02153 LAKE TITLE LLC 02/11/2021 0.00 202.19174995 UB*02154 LAND TITLE 02/11/2021 0.00 58.13174996 LENCHE LENZEN CHEVROLET BUICK 02/11/2021 0.00 239.67174997 UB*02165 ABBY & COREY LUDENS 02/11/2021 0.00 19.19174998 MBEInc MBE Inc 02/11/2021 0.00 2,120.00174999 MetGar Metro Garage Door Company 02/11/2021 0.00 698.54175000 METCO2 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 02/11/2021 0.00 205,291.66175001 MILWIN Milbank Winwater Works 02/11/2021 0.00 17,803.40175002 MNHEAL MN DEPT OF HEALTH 02/11/2021 0.00 20,642.00175003 MNGFOA MN GFOA 02/11/2021 0.00 210.00175004 NCPERS MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 02/11/2021 0.00 128.00175005 MWOA MN Wastewater Operator Assn 02/11/2021 0.00 60.00175006 NEWSIG NEWMAN SIGNS INC 02/11/2021 0.00 805.22175007 Ove&Son Overline & Son, Inc.02/11/2021 0.00 3,098.75175008 UB*02152 PARTNERS TITLE 02/11/2021 0.00 22.52175009 PILDRY PILGRIM DRY CLEANERS 02/11/2021 0.00 471.27175010 UB*02147 RESULTS TITLE 02/11/2021 0.00 37.22175011 UB*02162 RESULTS TITLE 02/11/2021 0.00 143.31175012 RMBENV RMB Environmental Laboratories Inc 02/11/2021 0.00 104.00175013 ShaDan Danielle Sharrock 02/11/2021 0.00 39.79175014 SHOTRU SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 02/11/2021 0.00 72.01175015 SOFHOU SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 02/11/2021 0.00 4,314.85175016 SOUSUB Southwest Suburban Publishing 02/11/2021 0.00 2,626.83175017 SpeSar Sara Spevacek 02/11/2021 0.00 300.00175018 GREPRO THE GREENWORLD PROJECT 02/11/2021 0.00 140.36175019 TheHart The Hartford 02/11/2021 0.00 1,291.81175020 UB*02146 TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES 02/11/2021 0.00 171.12175021 UB*02148 SHARON & STEVE VENO 02/11/2021 0.00 36.45175022 WastMana Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 02/11/2021 0.00 1,304.43175023 UB*02157 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 02/11/2021 0.00 74.30175024 Report Total (91 checks): 339,835.33 0.00 Page 2AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (2/12/2021 10:16 AM) Accounts Payable Checks by Date - Summary by Check User:dwashburn Printed: 2/12/2021 10:17 AM Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH ColFun Colliers Funding, LLC 01/29/2021 0.00 109,312.23 ACH AFLAC American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 02/04/2021 0.00 39.78 ACH BOYTRU Boyer Ford Trucks 02/04/2021 0.00 26.00 ACH CAMKNU CAMPBELL KNUTSON 02/04/2021 0.00 10,914.01 ACH carcou Carver County 02/04/2021 0.00 20,793.09 ACH CCPNIM CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 02/04/2021 0.00 2,323.51 ACH FASCOM FASTENAL COMPANY 02/04/2021 0.00 426.78 ACH GOPSTA GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 02/04/2021 0.00 175.55 ACH HANTHO HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 02/04/2021 0.00 5,009.00 ACH HAWCHE HAWKINS CHEMICAL 02/04/2021 0.00 2,977.02 ACH IMPPOR IMPERIAL PORTA PALACE 02/04/2021 0.00 908.10 ACH InnOff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 02/04/2021 0.00 743.66 ACH KATFUE KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 02/04/2021 0.00 14,315.63 ACH KIMHOR KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 02/04/2021 0.00 29,865.88 ACH MacEme Macqueen Emergengy Group 02/04/2021 0.00 1,033.20 ACH MACEQU MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 02/04/2021 0.00 868.41 ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 02/04/2021 0.00 602.66 ACH PotMN Potentia MN Solar 02/04/2021 0.00 3,560.72 ACH PRALAW PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN 02/04/2021 0.00 6.83 ACH RoaMac Road Machinery & Supplies 02/04/2021 0.00 19.46 ACH StanTruc Standard Spring-Truck Suspension Parts 02/04/2021 0.00 1,733.40 ACH SUBCHE SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 02/04/2021 0.00 65.40 ACH USABLU USA BLUE BOOK 02/04/2021 0.00 602.64 ACH VERIZO VERIZON WIRELESS 02/04/2021 0.00 5,381.37 ACH WatCon Water Conservation Services, Inc. 02/04/2021 0.00 342.20 ACH WIN911 WIN-911 02/04/2021 0.00 495.00 ACH WSB WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 02/04/2021 0.00 159.00 ACH WWGRA WW GRAINGER INC 02/04/2021 0.00 3,905.76 ACH XCEL XCEL ENERGY INC 02/04/2021 0.00 25,398.92 ACH BENEXT BENEFIT EXTRAS INC 02/11/2021 0.00 43.00 ACH BOYTRU Boyer Ford Trucks 02/11/2021 0.00 285.51 ACH carcou Carver County 02/11/2021 0.00 1,040.00 ACH ESSBRO ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC 02/11/2021 0.00 262.68 ACH HOOPTHRE Hoops & Threads LLC 02/11/2021 0.00 9.00 ACH INDLAN Indoor Landscapes Inc 02/11/2021 0.00 187.00 ACH JEFFIR JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 02/11/2021 0.00 312.79 ACH BENSKAYE KAYE L BENSON 02/11/2021 0.00 252.00 ACH Marco Marco Inc 02/11/2021 0.00 1,112.54 ACH MERACE MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 02/11/2021 0.00 963.83 ACH MinEqu Minnesota Equipment 02/11/2021 0.00 305.64 ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 02/11/2021 0.00 5,982.73 ACH MUNCOD MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATION 02/11/2021 0.00 900.00 ACH NAPA NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 02/11/2021 0.00 242.81 ACH NusEqu Nuss Truck & Equipment 02/11/2021 0.00 192.68 ACH OREAUT O'Reilly Automotive Inc 02/11/2021 0.00 146.17 ACH PIORIM PIONEER RIM & WHEEL CO. 02/11/2021 0.00 94.54 ACH PREMRM PRECISE MRM LLC 02/11/2021 0.00 300.00 Page 1 of 2 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH SafFas Safe-Fast, Inc. 02/11/2021 0.00 14.95 ACH SPSSLP SPS Companies Inc 02/11/2021 0.00 1.58 ACH MINCON SUMMIT COMPANIES 02/11/2021 0.00 1,571.25 ACH SunLif Sun Life Financial 02/11/2021 0.00 1,546.06 ACH TBEI TBEI, Inc 02/11/2021 0.00 2,540.58 ACH USABLU USA BLUE BOOK 02/11/2021 0.00 602.64 ACH WWGRA WW GRAINGER INC 02/11/2021 0.00 802.08 ACH ZIEGLE ZIEGLER INC 02/11/2021 0.00 709.22 Report Total: 0.00 262,426.49 Page 2 of 2 Accounts Payable Check Detail-Checks User: dwashburn Printed: 02/12/2021 - 10:22 AM Name Check Dat Account Description Amount ABC Cleaning, LLC 02/11/2021 101-1170-4300 Carpet Cleaning 115.00 ABC Cleaning, LLC 115.00 ALLSTREAM 02/04/2021 101-1160-4300 Mitel Phone System Maintenance 490.84 ALLSTREAM 490.84 ASPEN MILLS 02/11/2021 101-1220-4240 Uniform 145.35 ASPEN MILLS 02/11/2021 101-1220-4240 Uniform 145.35 ASPEN MILLS 02/11/2021 101-1220-4240 Uniform 182.20 ASPEN MILLS 02/11/2021 101-1220-4240 Uniform 156.20 ASPEN MILLS 02/11/2021 101-1220-4240 Uniform 567.89 ASPEN MILLS 1,196.99 ATKINSON HELEN 02/11/2021 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.64 ATKINSON HELEN 02/11/2021 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 4.04 ATKINSON HELEN 02/11/2021 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.39 ATKINSON HELEN 02/11/2021 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.88 ATKINSON HELEN 7.95 BCA 02/11/2021 101-1120-4300 Background Investigation 30.00 BCA 30.00 Blackburn Manufacturing Company 02/04/2021 701-0000-4150 Materials 999.52 Blackburn Manufacturing Company 999.52 BOONE MORTENSEN ALEXANDER & KIM 02/11/2021 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 8.76 BOONE MORTENSEN ALEXANDER & KIM 02/11/2021 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 20.07 BOONE MORTENSEN ALEXANDER & KIM 02/11/2021 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 6.29 BOONE MORTENSEN ALEXANDER & KIM 02/11/2021 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.22 BOONE MORTENSEN ALEXANDER & KIM 36.34 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 02/11/2021 101-1220-4510 Materials 64.96 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 64.96 BRANDT PETER & DEANNA 02/11/2021 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 75.71 BRANDT PETER & DEANNA 75.71 CARVER COUNTY ABSTRACT & TITLE CO 02/11/2021 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 48.84 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (02/12/2021 - 10:22 AM)Page 1 of 9 Name Check Dat Account Description Amount CARVER COUNTY ABSTRACT & TITLE CO 02/11/2021 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 81.78 CARVER COUNTY ABSTRACT & TITLE CO 02/11/2021 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 12.47 CARVER COUNTY ABSTRACT & TITLE CO 02/11/2021 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 7.99 CARVER COUNTY ABSTRACT & TITLE CO 151.08 Carver County Parks 02/11/2021 101-1731-3636 Rec Programs 82.50 Carver County Parks 82.50 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 02/04/2021 605-6502-4300 Monthly Service 83.49 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 02/04/2021 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service 5.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 02/11/2021 700-0000-4320 Monthly Service 66.54 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 02/11/2021 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service 5.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 02/11/2021 101-1600-4320 Monthly Service 14.57 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 02/11/2021 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service 5.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 02/11/2021 701-0000-4320 Monthly Service 19.63 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 02/11/2021 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service 5.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 02/11/2021 101-1550-4320 Monthly Service 409.08 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 02/11/2021 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service 9.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 02/11/2021 101-1190-4320 Monthly Service 1,936.43 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 02/11/2021 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service 20.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 02/11/2021 700-7043-4320 Monthly Service 1,347.27 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 02/11/2021 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service 20.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 02/11/2021 700-7019-4320 Monthly Service 450.17 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 02/11/2021 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service 9.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 02/11/2021 101-1170-4320 Monthly Service 1,233.54 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 02/11/2021 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service 20.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 5,658.72 CenturyLink 02/11/2021 700-0000-4310 Monthly Service 32.00 CenturyLink 02/11/2021 701-0000-4310 Monthly Service 32.00 CENTURYLINK 02/04/2021 700-0000-4310 Monthly Service 15.13 CENTURYLINK 02/04/2021 700-7019-4310 Monthly Service 210.27 CENTURYLINK 02/04/2021 701-0000-4310 Monthly Service 15.13 CENTURYLINK 02/04/2021 101-1160-4320 Monthly Service 250.00 CENTURYLINK 02/04/2021 101-1540-4310 Monthly Service 95.40 CENTURYLINK 02/04/2021 101-1190-4310 Monthly Service 127.20 CENTURYLINK 02/04/2021 101-1170-4310 Monthly Service 872.26 CENTURYLINK 02/04/2021 700-0000-4310 Monthly Service 6.36 CENTURYLINK 02/04/2021 701-0000-4310 Monthly Service 6.36 CENTURYLINK 02/04/2021 101-1550-4310 Monthly Service 30.04 CENTURYLINK 02/04/2021 101-1350-4310 Monthly Service 30.04 CENTURYLINK 02/04/2021 101-1220-4310 Monthly Service 33.04 CENTURYLINK 02/04/2021 101-1370-4310 Monthly Service 50.88 CENTURYLINK 02/04/2021 101-1160-4320 Monthly Service 125.00 CENTURYLINK 1,931.11 CHESSEN CHAD & MICHELLE 02/11/2021 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 21.49 CHESSEN CHAD & MICHELLE 02/11/2021 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 30.04 CHESSEN CHAD & MICHELLE 02/11/2021 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 7.92 CHESSEN CHAD & MICHELLE 02/11/2021 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.54 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (02/12/2021 - 10:22 AM)Page 2 of 9 Name Check Dat Account Description Amount CHESSEN CHAD & MICHELLE 60.99 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 02/04/2021 700-0000-2019 Delinquent utility certified 406.30 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 02/04/2021 700-0000-3140 Delinquent utility certified 47.67 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 453.97 Compass Minerals America, Inc 02/04/2021 101-1320-4150 Materials 1,623.76 Compass Minerals America, Inc 02/04/2021 101-1320-4150 Materials 4,878.57 Compass Minerals America, Inc 02/11/2021 101-1320-4150 Materials 9,163.49 Compass Minerals America, Inc 15,665.82 CROWN COLLEGE 02/11/2021 101-1220-4370 EMT Training 4,350.00 CROWN COLLEGE 4,350.00 CUB FOODS 02/11/2021 101-1220-4290 Supplies 14.46 CUB FOODS 14.46 DEGENSTEIN VICKI & JASON 02/11/2021 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.81 DEGENSTEIN VICKI & JASON 02/11/2021 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 19.87 DEGENSTEIN VICKI & JASON 02/11/2021 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 32.70 DEGENSTEIN VICKI & JASON 02/11/2021 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.81 DEGENSTEIN VICKI & JASON 55.19 EDEN TRACE CORPORATION 02/04/2021 815-8221-2024 Security Escrow - Hydrant 2,500.00 EDEN TRACE CORPORATION 2,500.00 EDINA REALTY TITLE 02/11/2021 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 10.59 EDINA REALTY TITLE 02/11/2021 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 5.95 EDINA REALTY TITLE 02/11/2021 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 19.00 EDINA REALTY TITLE 02/11/2021 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 6.58 EDINA REALTY TITLE 02/11/2021 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.15 EDINA REALTY TITLE 43.27 ERINAKES ETHAN 02/11/2021 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 37.77 ERINAKES ETHAN 02/11/2021 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 55.38 ERINAKES ETHAN 02/11/2021 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 4.98 ERINAKES ETHAN 02/11/2021 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 5.02 ERINAKES ETHAN 103.15 EXCECUTIVE TITLE SERVICES 02/11/2021 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 13.94 EXCECUTIVE TITLE SERVICES 02/11/2021 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.24 EXCECUTIVE TITLE SERVICES 14.18 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 02/04/2021 101-1250-4140 Supplies 92.83 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 92.83 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (02/12/2021 - 10:22 AM)Page 3 of 9 Name Check Dat Account Description Amount Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 02/04/2021 700-7019-4510 Materials 2,850.67 Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 02/11/2021 700-0000-4550 Supplies 509.03 Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 3,359.70 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 02/04/2021 700-0000-4250 Materials 3,406.26 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 02/11/2021 700-0000-4550 Materials 9,000.00 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 02/11/2021 700-0000-4550 Materials 25.55 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 12,431.81 FleetPride, Inc.02/11/2021 101-1370-4170 Fluid 141.14 FleetPride, Inc.02/11/2021 101-1320-4140 Core return -60.00 FleetPride, Inc. 81.14 FORD GARY 02/11/2021 700-0000-4370 Training - Michael Wegner 595.00 FORD GARY 595.00 Freehauf Jennifer 02/04/2021 101-1538-3631 Tae Kwon Do Class - Refund 140.00 Freehauf Jennifer 140.00 GRAYBAR 02/11/2021 101-1350-4120 Supplies 45.12 GRAYBAR 45.12 GREEN MEADOWS INC 02/04/2021 101-1550-1193 Snow Plowing 880.00 GREEN MEADOWS INC 880.00 GYM WORKS INC 02/04/2021 101-1530-4530 Preventative Maintenance 400.00 GYM WORKS INC 400.00 Hach Company 02/04/2021 700-7043-4530 Equipment 95.58 Hach Company 02/04/2021 700-7043-4530 Equipment 3,057.85 Hach Company 3,153.43 HOOPS AND THREADS LLC 02/04/2021 101-1310-4120 Custom Embroidery 18.00 HOOPS AND THREADS LLC 02/04/2021 700-0000-4240 Custom Embroidery 16.00 HOOPS AND THREADS LLC 34.00 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST 112 02/11/2021 101-1530-4320 Utilities 3,510.64 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST 112 02/11/2021 101-1530-4320 Utilities 1,982.08 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST 112 5,492.72 IUOE Local #49 02/11/2021 101-0000-2004 PR Batch 00412.02.2021 Local 49 dues 422.94 IUOE Local #49 02/11/2021 700-0000-2004 PR Batch 00412.02.2021 Local 49 dues 242.22 IUOE Local #49 02/11/2021 701-0000-2004 PR Batch 00412.02.2021 Local 49 dues 34.84 IUOE Local #49 700.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (02/12/2021 - 10:22 AM)Page 4 of 9 Name Check Dat Account Description Amount Jaguar Communications Inc 02/11/2021 700-7043-4310 Monthly Service 53.60 Jaguar Communications Inc 53.60 Jones David 02/11/2021 101-1560-4300 Speaker Fee 50.00 Jones David 50.00 LAI ALEXANDER & KARENEA 02/11/2021 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 64.86 LAI ALEXANDER & KARENEA 64.86 LAKE TITLE LLC 02/11/2021 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 138.99 LAKE TITLE LLC 02/11/2021 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 46.51 LAKE TITLE LLC 02/11/2021 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 13.36 LAKE TITLE LLC 02/11/2021 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.33 LAKE TITLE LLC 202.19 LAND TITLE 02/11/2021 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 13.49 LAND TITLE 02/11/2021 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 26.56 LAND TITLE 02/11/2021 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 15.14 LAND TITLE 02/11/2021 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.94 LAND TITLE 58.13 LENZEN CHEVROLET BUICK 02/11/2021 101-1320-4520 Install Utilit Box Lights 239.67 LENZEN CHEVROLET BUICK 239.67 LOFGREN HEATING & A/C 02/04/2021 101-1250-3305 Permit Refund - 8801 Reflections Road 46.20 LOFGREN HEATING & A/C 02/04/2021 101-0000-2022 Permit Refund - 8801 Reflections Road 0.86 LOFGREN HEATING & A/C 02/04/2021 400-0000-3613 Permit Refund - 8801 Reflections Road 1.20 LOFGREN HEATING & A/C 48.26 LUDENS ABBY & COREY 02/11/2021 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 7.95 LUDENS ABBY & COREY 02/11/2021 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 7.81 LUDENS ABBY & COREY 02/11/2021 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.87 LUDENS ABBY & COREY 02/11/2021 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.56 LUDENS ABBY & COREY 19.19 MBE Inc 02/04/2021 720-7025-4290 Dump Fee 2,640.00 MBE Inc 02/11/2021 720-7025-4290 Disposal 2,120.00 MBE Inc 4,760.00 Metro Garage Door Company 02/04/2021 101-1370-4510 Repair overhead doors 525.75 Metro Garage Door Company 02/11/2021 101-1550-4510 Repair 698.54 Metro Garage Door Company 1,224.29 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 02/11/2021 701-0000-4509 Waste Water 205,291.66 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 205,291.66 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (02/12/2021 - 10:22 AM)Page 5 of 9 Name Check Dat Account Description Amount Milbank Winwater Works 02/11/2021 700-0000-4250 Materials 17,803.40 Milbank Winwater Works 17,803.40 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 02/11/2021 700-0000-4509 Water Supply Service 20,642.00 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 20,642.00 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 01/29/2021 701-0000-4370 electrical license-Johnson 100.00 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 100.00 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 02/04/2021 605-6502-4300 Material Testing & Inspection 103.57 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 02/04/2021 101-1350-4565 Traffic Signal Inspection 151.35 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 254.92 MN GFOA 02/11/2021 101-1130-4360 Membership - Danielle Washburn 70.00 MN GFOA 02/11/2021 101-1130-4360 Membership - Ashley McGovern 70.00 MN GFOA 02/11/2021 101-1130-4360 Membership - Kim Hiivala 70.00 MN GFOA 210.00 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 02/11/2021 101-0000-2011 PR Batch 00412.02.2021 NCPERS-Life Insurance 94.44 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 02/11/2021 210-0000-2011 PR Batch 00412.02.2021 NCPERS-Life Insurance 3.97 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 02/11/2021 700-0000-2011 PR Batch 00412.02.2021 NCPERS-Life Insurance 13.57 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 02/11/2021 701-0000-2011 PR Batch 00412.02.2021 NCPERS-Life Insurance 13.60 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 02/11/2021 720-0000-2011 PR Batch 00412.02.2021 NCPERS-Life Insurance 2.42 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 128.00 MN Pollution Control Agency 02/04/2021 701-0000-4370 Certification Examination - Kevin Crooks 55.00 MN Pollution Control Agency 55.00 MN Wastewater Operator Assn 02/04/2021 701-0000-4360 Membership 60.00 MN Wastewater Operator Assn 02/11/2021 701-0000-4360 MWOA Membership 60.00 MN Wastewater Operator Assn 120.00 Musolf Joseph 02/04/2021 101-1320-4150 Safety Gear 74.99 Musolf Joseph 74.99 NEWMAN SIGNS INC 02/11/2021 101-1320-4560 Signs 805.22 NEWMAN SIGNS INC 805.22 NORTHWESTERN POWER EQUIP CO 02/04/2021 700-0000-4550 Materials 7,691.74 NORTHWESTERN POWER EQUIP CO 7,691.74 Overline & Son, Inc.02/11/2021 701-0000-4551 Professional services 3,098.75 Overline & Son, Inc. 3,098.75 PARTNERS TITLE 02/11/2021 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 7.83 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (02/12/2021 - 10:22 AM)Page 6 of 9 Name Check Dat Account Description Amount PARTNERS TITLE 02/11/2021 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 13.68 PARTNERS TITLE 02/11/2021 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.50 PARTNERS TITLE 02/11/2021 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.51 PARTNERS TITLE 22.52 PILGRIM DRY CLEANERS 02/11/2021 101-1220-4300 Laundry Service 471.27 PILGRIM DRY CLEANERS 471.27 RESULTS TITLE 02/11/2021 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 18.15 RESULTS TITLE 02/11/2021 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 13.73 RESULTS TITLE 02/11/2021 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 4.47 RESULTS TITLE 02/11/2021 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.87 RESULTS TITLE 02/11/2021 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 76.71 RESULTS TITLE 02/11/2021 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 50.67 RESULTS TITLE 02/11/2021 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 13.34 RESULTS TITLE 02/11/2021 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.59 RESULTS TITLE 180.53 RMB Environmental Laboratories Inc 02/11/2021 720-0000-4300 Beach Monitoring 104.00 RMB Environmental Laboratories Inc 104.00 Sharrock Danielle 02/11/2021 101-1520-4370 Travel 39.79 Sharrock Danielle 39.79 SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 02/11/2021 101-1190-4510 Supplies 15.93 SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 02/11/2021 101-1170-4510 Supplies 10.50 SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 02/11/2021 101-1220-4510 Supplies 27.96 SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 02/11/2021 101-1220-4510 Supplies 12.26 SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 02/11/2021 101-1170-4510 Materials 5.36 SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 72.01 SIEGLE CHARLES 02/04/2021 101-1370-4240 Clothing Allowance - reissued previous check 425.00 SIEGLE CHARLES 425.00 Sioux Valley Environmental 02/04/2021 700-7019-4530 Parts 1,270.00 Sioux Valley Environmental 1,270.00 SMSC Organics Recycling Facility 02/04/2021 101-1320-4150 Organics Recycling 407.52 SMSC Organics Recycling Facility 407.52 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 02/11/2021 101-1160-4220 Annual VMWare vSphere vCenter Renewals 4,314.85 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 4,314.85 Southwest Suburban Publishing 02/11/2021 101-1110-4340 Publishing 1,393.44 Southwest Suburban Publishing 02/11/2021 101-1210-4340 Publishing 504.28 Southwest Suburban Publishing 02/11/2021 101-1310-4340 Publishing 84.84 Southwest Suburban Publishing 02/11/2021 101-1410-4340 Publishing 123.74 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (02/12/2021 - 10:22 AM)Page 7 of 9 Name Check Dat Account Description Amount Southwest Suburban Publishing 02/11/2021 101-1611-4340 Publishing 520.53 Southwest Suburban Publishing 2,626.83 Spevacek Sara 02/11/2021 101-1531-3631 Class Refund 300.00 Spevacek Sara 300.00 Taylor Electric Company, LLC 02/04/2021 101-1350-4565 Electrical Work 1,170.00 Taylor Electric Company, LLC 1,170.00 TFORCE FINAL MILE 02/04/2021 400-0000-1155 Delivery Service 55.43 TFORCE FINAL MILE 55.43 THE GREENWORLD PROJECT 02/11/2021 720-7202-4130 Arbor Day Seedlings 140.36 THE GREENWORLD PROJECT 140.36 The Hartford 02/11/2021 101-1120-4045 February 2021 84.63 The Hartford 02/11/2021 101-1130-4045 February 2021 36.70 The Hartford 02/11/2021 101-1160-4045 February 2021 34.45 The Hartford 02/11/2021 101-1250-4045 February 2021 130.35 The Hartford 02/11/2021 101-1310-4045 February 2021 92.19 The Hartford 02/11/2021 101-1320-4045 February 2021 169.95 The Hartford 02/11/2021 101-1370-4045 February 2021 56.04 The Hartford 02/11/2021 101-1520-4045 February 2021 41.61 The Hartford 02/11/2021 101-1530-4045 February 2021 17.69 The Hartford 02/11/2021 101-1560-4045 February 2021 14.76 The Hartford 02/11/2021 101-1600-4045 February 2021 12.09 The Hartford 02/11/2021 101-1700-4045 February 2021 1.34 The Hartford 02/11/2021 101-1550-4045 February 2021 111.22 The Hartford 02/11/2021 101-1420-4045 February 2021 98.20 The Hartford 02/11/2021 101-1430-4045 February 2021 5.88 The Hartford 02/11/2021 210-0000-4045 February 2021 21.87 The Hartford 02/11/2021 720-7201-4045 February 2021 6.94 The Hartford 02/11/2021 720-7202-4045 February 2021 6.94 The Hartford 02/11/2021 101-1170-4045 February 2021 14.98 The Hartford 02/11/2021 101-1220-4045 February 2021 65.23 The Hartford 02/11/2021 701-0000-4045 February 2021 94.59 The Hartford 02/11/2021 700-0000-4045 February 2021 124.56 The Hartford 02/11/2021 720-0000-4045 February 2021 49.60 The Hartford 1,291.81 TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES 02/11/2021 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.22 TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES 02/11/2021 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 138.40 TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES 02/11/2021 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 19.06 TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES 02/11/2021 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 11.44 TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES 171.12 VENO SHARON & STEVE 02/11/2021 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 36.45 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (02/12/2021 - 10:22 AM)Page 8 of 9 Name Check Dat Account Description Amount VENO SHARON & STEVE 36.45 Veolia Environmental Services 02/04/2021 101-1370-4300 Fluorescent Lamps 45.97 Veolia Environmental Services 45.97 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 02/04/2021 101-1550-4300 Trash Removal - Lake Ann Park 807.77 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 02/11/2021 101-1170-4350 Monthly Service 205.66 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 02/11/2021 101-1220-4350 Monthly Service 30.38 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 02/11/2021 101-1220-4350 Monthly Service 77.97 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 02/11/2021 101-1190-4350 Monthly Service 240.59 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 02/11/2021 101-1370-4350 Monthly Service 217.48 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 02/11/2021 700-0000-4350 Monthly Service 27.18 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 02/11/2021 701-0000-4350 Monthly Service 27.18 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 02/11/2021 101-1550-4350 Monthly Service 477.99 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 2,112.20 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 02/11/2021 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 46.82 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 02/11/2021 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 17.97 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 02/11/2021 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 7.97 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 02/11/2021 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.54 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 74.30 339,835.33 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (02/12/2021 - 10:22 AM)Page 9 of 9 Accounts Payable Check Detail-ACH User: dwashburn Printed: 02/12/2021 - 10:22 AM Name Check Da Account Description Amount American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 02/04/2021 101-0000-2008 January Insurance 39.78 American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 39.78 BENEFIT EXTRAS INC 02/11/2021 101-0000-2012 Monthly Cobra 13.00 BENEFIT EXTRAS INC 02/11/2021 101-1120-4300 Monthly Participation Fee 30.00 BENEFIT EXTRAS INC 43.00 BENSON KAYE L 02/11/2021 101-1539-4300 Class Instruction 252.00 BENSON KAYE L 252.00 Boyer Ford Trucks 02/04/2021 101-1320-4140 Supplies 26.00 Boyer Ford Trucks 02/11/2021 700-0000-4120 Supplies 124.39 Boyer Ford Trucks 02/11/2021 101-1320-4140 Supplies 161.12 Boyer Ford Trucks 311.51 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 02/04/2021 101-1140-4302 Legal Services 10,914.01 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 10,914.01 Carver County 02/04/2021 101-1210-4300 4th Qtr 2020 Police Contract Overtime 14,645.55 Carver County 02/04/2021 101-1210-4300 Liquor License Background Investigation 250.00 Carver County 02/04/2021 101-0000-3010 November Settlement Advance 110,581.71 Carver County 02/04/2021 101-0000-3010 Final Settlement -69,473.22 Carver County 02/04/2021 369-0000-3010 Final Settlement -3,058.49 Carver County 02/04/2021 370-0000-3010 Final Settlement -3,635.40 Carver County 02/04/2021 400-0000-3010 Final Settlement -6,053.23 Carver County 02/04/2021 601-0000-1210 Final Settlement -1,729.37 Carver County 02/04/2021 420-0000-3010 Final Settlement -703.68 Carver County 02/04/2021 601-0000-2231 Final Settlement 1,729.37 Carver County 02/04/2021 601-0000-3010 Final Settlement -5,512.27 Carver County 02/04/2021 601-0000-3140 Final Settlement -72.89 Carver County 02/04/2021 601-6028-3130 Final Settlement -655.64 Carver County 02/04/2021 601-6030-3130 Final Settlement -70.87 Carver County 02/04/2021 601-6033-3130 Final Settlement -855.73 Carver County 02/04/2021 601-6036-3130 Final Settlement -147.13 Carver County 02/04/2021 700-0000-1195 Final Settlement -3,039.15 Carver County 02/04/2021 700-0000-1230 Final Settlement -406.30 Carver County 02/04/2021 700-0000-3140 Final Settlement -291.87 Carver County 02/04/2021 101-0000-3011 Final delinquent settlement -1,264.68 Carver County 02/04/2021 601-0000-3140 Final delinquent settlement -196.35 Carver County 02/04/2021 700-0000-1195 Final delinquent settlement -99.80 Carver County 02/04/2021 700-0000-3140 Final delinquent settlement -42.95 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (02/12/2021 - 10:22 AM)Page 1 of 7 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Carver County 02/04/2021 101-0000-3010 Final Misc Settlement -9,104.52 Carver County 02/11/2021 101-1160-4320 CarverLink Internet 540.00 Carver County 02/11/2021 700-7043-4320 Carver Fiber 500.00 Carver County 21,833.09 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 02/04/2021 101-1220-4320 January 2021 Services 39.00 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 02/04/2021 101-1350-4320 January 2021 Services 1,018.65 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 02/04/2021 101-1540-4320 January 2021 Services 114.50 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 02/04/2021 101-1550-4320 January 2021 Services 121.83 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 02/04/2021 101-1600-4320 January 2021 Services 9.35 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 02/04/2021 700-0000-4320 January 2021 Services 35.71 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 02/04/2021 700-7019-4320 January 2021 Services 568.43 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 02/04/2021 701-0000-4320 January 2021 Services 416.04 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 2,323.51 Colliers Funding, LLC 01/29/2021 480-0000-4804 TIF Payment 109,312.23 Colliers Funding, LLC 109,312.23 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC 02/11/2021 700-0000-4550 Materials 262.68 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC 262.68 FASTENAL COMPANY 02/04/2021 101-1550-4150 Materials 306.00 FASTENAL COMPANY 02/04/2021 101-1320-4140 Supplies 45.18 FASTENAL COMPANY 02/04/2021 700-0000-4550 Materials 5.88 FASTENAL COMPANY 02/04/2021 700-0000-4550 Materials 69.72 FASTENAL COMPANY 426.78 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 02/04/2021 400-0000-4300 2021 Annual Facility Operator Fee 50.00 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 02/04/2021 400-0000-4300 Service Calls 125.55 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 175.55 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 02/04/2021 400-0000-1155 Lotus Woods Development 5,009.00 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 5,009.00 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 02/04/2021 700-7019-4160 Chemicals 2,977.02 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 2,977.02 Hoops & Threads LLC 02/11/2021 101-1310-4120 Custom Embroidery 9.00 Hoops & Threads LLC 9.00 IMPERIAL PORTA PALACE 02/04/2021 101-1550-4400 Portable Restrooms 908.10 IMPERIAL PORTA PALACE 908.10 Indoor Landscapes Inc 02/11/2021 101-1170-4300 February Plant Service 187.00 Indoor Landscapes Inc 187.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (02/12/2021 - 10:22 AM)Page 2 of 7 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Innovative Office Solutions LLC 02/04/2021 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 338.40 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 02/04/2021 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 90.84 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 02/04/2021 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 88.12 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 02/04/2021 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 226.30 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 743.66 JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 02/11/2021 101-1220-4120 Supplies 312.79 JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 312.79 KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 02/04/2021 101-1370-4170 Lubricants 14,315.63 KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 14,315.63 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 02/04/2021 400-0000-1155 Services through November 30, 2020 9,990.00 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 02/04/2021 400-0000-1155 Services through December 31, 2020 1,628.00 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 02/04/2021 601-6043-4300 Services through December 31, 2020 12,791.53 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 02/04/2021 601-6046-4300 Services through December 31, 2020 5,456.35 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 29,865.88 Macqueen Emergengy Group 02/04/2021 700-0000-4250 Supplies 1,033.20 Macqueen Emergengy Group 1,033.20 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 02/04/2021 701-0000-4120 Leader Hose 868.41 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 868.41 Marco Inc 02/11/2021 101-1170-4410 Printer Rental 825.04 Marco Inc 02/11/2021 700-0000-4410 Printer Rental 115.00 Marco Inc 02/11/2021 701-0000-4410 Printer Rental 115.00 Marco Inc 02/11/2021 720-0000-4410 Printer Rental 57.50 Marco Inc 1,112.54 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 02/11/2021 101-1220-4120 Supplies 92.78 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 02/11/2021 101-1220-4350 Supplies 112.34 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 02/11/2021 101-1220-4510 Materials 27.96 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 02/11/2021 101-1310-4120 Supplies 60.25 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 02/11/2021 101-1320-4120 Supplies 20.49 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 02/11/2021 101-1320-4150 Materials 31.20 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 02/11/2021 101-1550-4120 Materials 14.02 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 02/11/2021 101-1550-4150 Materials 17.26 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 02/11/2021 700-0000-4150 Materials 62.06 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 02/11/2021 700-0000-4260 Tools 101.37 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 02/11/2021 700-7019-4150 Materials 126.52 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 02/11/2021 700-7043-4120 Supplies 23.63 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 02/11/2021 700-7043-4150 Materials 225.95 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 02/11/2021 701-0000-4260 Tools 48.00 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 963.83 Minnesota Equipment 02/11/2021 101-1550-4120 Supplies 87.87 Minnesota Equipment 02/11/2021 101-1550-4120 Supplies 159.27 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (02/12/2021 - 10:22 AM)Page 3 of 7 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Minnesota Equipment 02/11/2021 101-1550-4120 Core Return -50.00 Minnesota Equipment 02/11/2021 101-1550-4120 Supplies 108.50 Minnesota Equipment 305.64 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 02/04/2021 101-1350-4320 Monthly Service 161.19 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 02/04/2021 101-1350-4320 Monthly Service 44.72 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 02/04/2021 101-1350-4320 Monthly Service 26.60 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 02/04/2021 101-1350-4320 Monthly Service 101.69 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 02/04/2021 101-1350-4320 Monthly Service 238.89 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 02/04/2021 101-1350-4320 Monthly Service 29.57 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 02/11/2021 101-1350-4320 Monthly Service 5,227.92 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 02/11/2021 101-1600-4320 Monthly Service 71.92 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 02/11/2021 700-0000-4320 Monthly Service 148.14 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 02/11/2021 701-0000-4320 Monthly Service 477.71 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 02/11/2021 605-6502-4300 Monthly Service 57.04 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 6,585.39 MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATION 02/11/2021 101-1160-4300 Annual City Code Hosting Fee 900.00 MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATION 900.00 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 02/11/2021 700-0000-4120 Supplies 211.03 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 02/11/2021 101-1550-4120 Supplies 14.52 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 02/11/2021 101-1550-4140 Supplies 17.26 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 242.81 Nuss Truck & Equipment 02/11/2021 101-1320-4140 Supplies 192.68 Nuss Truck & Equipment 192.68 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 02/11/2021 700-0000-4520 Materials 9.36 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 02/11/2021 101-1320-4140 Supplies 12.92 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 02/11/2021 101-1250-4140 Supplies 48.63 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 02/11/2021 101-1250-4140 Supplies 43.05 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 02/11/2021 101-1310-4140 Supplies 32.21 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 146.17 PIONEER RIM & WHEEL CO.02/11/2021 101-1320-4140 Supplies 94.54 PIONEER RIM & WHEEL CO. 94.54 Potentia MN Solar 02/04/2021 700-0000-4320 Monthly Service 791.32 Potentia MN Solar 02/04/2021 101-1190-4320 Monthly Service 1,556.23 Potentia MN Solar 02/04/2021 101-1170-4320 Monthly Service 1,213.17 Potentia MN Solar 3,560.72 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN 02/04/2021 101-1320-4120 Supplies 6.83 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN 6.83 PRECISE MRM LLC 02/11/2021 101-1320-4310 2020-12 Subscription 300.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (02/12/2021 - 10:22 AM)Page 4 of 7 Name Check Da Account Description Amount PRECISE MRM LLC 300.00 Road Machinery & Supplies 02/04/2021 101-1320-4120 Supplies 19.46 Road Machinery & Supplies 19.46 Safe-Fast, Inc.02/11/2021 101-1310-4120 Safety Vest 14.95 Safe-Fast, Inc. 14.95 SPS Companies Inc 02/11/2021 101-1170-4510 Materials 31.20 SPS Companies Inc 02/11/2021 101-1220-4530 Materials 9.40 SPS Companies Inc 02/11/2021 101-1220-4530 Materials - return -39.02 SPS Companies Inc 1.58 Standard Spring-Truck Suspension Parts 02/04/2021 101-1320-4140 Supplies 1,733.40 Standard Spring-Truck Suspension Parts 1,733.40 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 02/04/2021 101-1250-4140 Supplies 65.40 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 65.40 SUMMIT COMPANIES 02/11/2021 101-1220-4530 Service call 209.75 SUMMIT COMPANIES 02/11/2021 101-1220-4530 Service call 590.50 SUMMIT COMPANIES 02/11/2021 101-1190-4530 Service call 771.00 SUMMIT COMPANIES 1,571.25 Sun Life Financial 02/11/2021 101-0000-2011 February - Cobra 50.66 Sun Life Financial 02/11/2021 101-1120-4046 February Insurance 33.82 Sun Life Financial 02/11/2021 101-1130-4046 February Insurance 14.60 Sun Life Financial 02/11/2021 101-1160-4046 February Insurance 13.61 Sun Life Financial 02/11/2021 101-1250-4046 February Insurance 51.54 Sun Life Financial 02/11/2021 101-1310-4046 February Insurance 45.55 Sun Life Financial 02/11/2021 101-1320-4046 February Insurance 57.86 Sun Life Financial 02/11/2021 101-1370-4046 February Insurance 21.62 Sun Life Financial 02/11/2021 101-1520-4046 February Insurance 16.51 Sun Life Financial 02/11/2021 101-1530-4046 February Insurance 7.01 Sun Life Financial 02/11/2021 101-1560-4046 February Insurance 5.86 Sun Life Financial 02/11/2021 101-1600-4046 February Insurance 4.75 Sun Life Financial 02/11/2021 101-1700-4046 February Insurance 0.53 Sun Life Financial 02/11/2021 101-1550-4046 February Insurance 43.44 Sun Life Financial 02/11/2021 101-1420-4046 February Insurance 39.24 Sun Life Financial 02/11/2021 101-1430-4046 February Insurance 2.33 Sun Life Financial 02/11/2021 210-0000-4046 February Insurance 8.69 Sun Life Financial 02/11/2021 720-7201-4046 February Insurance 2.74 Sun Life Financial 02/11/2021 720-7202-4046 February Insurance 2.74 Sun Life Financial 02/11/2021 101-1170-4046 February Insurance 3.87 Sun Life Financial 02/11/2021 101-1220-4046 February Insurance 26.31 Sun Life Financial 02/11/2021 701-0000-4046 February Insurance 37.28 Sun Life Financial 02/11/2021 700-0000-4046 February Insurance 49.20 Sun Life Financial 02/11/2021 720-0000-4046 February Insurance 19.76 Sun Life Financial 02/11/2021 101-0000-2011 February Insurance 662.64 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (02/12/2021 - 10:22 AM)Page 5 of 7 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Sun Life Financial 02/11/2021 210-0000-2011 February Insurance 10.59 Sun Life Financial 02/11/2021 700-0000-2011 February Insurance 151.52 Sun Life Financial 02/11/2021 701-0000-2011 February Insurance 151.52 Sun Life Financial 02/11/2021 720-0000-2011 February Insurance 10.27 Sun Life Financial 1,546.06 TBEI, Inc 02/11/2021 101-1320-4140 Supplies 129.95 TBEI, Inc 02/11/2021 101-1320-4120 Supplies 2,410.63 TBEI, Inc 2,540.58 USA BLUE BOOK 02/04/2021 700-0000-4550 Supplies 602.64 USA BLUE BOOK 02/11/2021 700-0000-4550 Materials 602.64 USA BLUE BOOK 1,205.28 VERIZON WIRELESS 02/04/2021 101-1220-4310 Monthly Service 40.01 VERIZON WIRELESS 02/04/2021 700-0000-4310 Monthly Service 87.57 VERIZON WIRELESS 02/04/2021 701-0000-4310 Monthly Service 87.57 VERIZON WIRELESS 02/04/2021 101-1520-4310 Monthly Service 512.72 VERIZON WIRELESS 02/04/2021 101-1600-4310 Monthly Service 167.41 VERIZON WIRELESS 02/04/2021 101-1530-4310 Monthly Service 41.50 VERIZON WIRELESS 02/04/2021 700-0000-4310 Monthly Service 881.47 VERIZON WIRELESS 02/04/2021 701-0000-4310 Monthly Service 736.16 VERIZON WIRELESS 02/04/2021 720-0000-4310 Monthly Service 198.03 VERIZON WIRELESS 02/04/2021 101-1160-4310 Monthly Service 93.00 VERIZON WIRELESS 02/04/2021 101-1120-4310 Monthly Service 146.53 VERIZON WIRELESS 02/04/2021 101-1170-4310 Monthly Service 41.50 VERIZON WIRELESS 02/04/2021 101-1260-4310 Monthly Service 76.51 VERIZON WIRELESS 02/04/2021 101-1250-4310 Monthly Service 288.05 VERIZON WIRELESS 02/04/2021 101-1310-4310 Monthly Service 539.82 VERIZON WIRELESS 02/04/2021 101-1370-4310 Monthly Service 100.66 VERIZON WIRELESS 02/04/2021 101-1320-4310 Monthly Service 335.36 VERIZON WIRELESS 02/04/2021 101-1220-4310 Monthly Service 503.12 VERIZON WIRELESS 02/04/2021 101-0000-2033 Monthly Service 11.31 VERIZON WIRELESS 02/04/2021 101-1110-4300 Monthly Service 65.83 VERIZON WIRELESS 02/04/2021 101-1550-4310 Monthly Service 427.24 VERIZON WIRELESS 5,381.37 Water Conservation Services, Inc.02/04/2021 700-0000-4552 Repair Services 342.20 Water Conservation Services, Inc. 342.20 WIN-911 02/04/2021 700-0000-4552 Annual Maintenance 495.00 WIN-911 495.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 02/04/2021 101-1310-4300 2020 GIS/AMS Support Service 159.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 159.00 WW GRAINGER INC 02/04/2021 700-0000-4550 Supplies 1,065.80 WW GRAINGER INC 02/04/2021 700-0000-4550 Supplies 844.22 WW GRAINGER INC 02/04/2021 700-0000-4550 Supplies 454.58 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (02/12/2021 - 10:22 AM)Page 6 of 7 Name Check Da Account Description Amount WW GRAINGER INC 02/04/2021 700-0000-4550 Supplies 668.92 WW GRAINGER INC 02/04/2021 700-0000-4550 Supplies 466.20 WW GRAINGER INC 02/04/2021 700-0000-4550 Supplies 764.48 WW GRAINGER INC 02/04/2021 101-1550-4150 Duplicate Payment -139.65 WW GRAINGER INC 02/04/2021 101-1550-4150 Duplicate Payment -182.39 WW GRAINGER INC 02/04/2021 101-1550-4150 Duplicate Payment -36.40 WW GRAINGER INC 02/11/2021 700-0000-4550 Supplies 802.08 WW GRAINGER INC 4,707.84 XCEL ENERGY INC 02/04/2021 101-1350-4320 Monthly Service 21,603.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 02/04/2021 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service 392.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 02/04/2021 701-0000-4320 Monthly Service 2,801.78 XCEL ENERGY INC 02/04/2021 700-0000-4320 Monthly Service -256.57 XCEL ENERGY INC 02/04/2021 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service 398.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 02/04/2021 101-1600-4320 Monthly Service 29.38 XCEL ENERGY INC 02/04/2021 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service 28.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 02/04/2021 700-0000-4320 Monthly Service 77.46 XCEL ENERGY INC 02/04/2021 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service 14.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 02/04/2021 101-1350-4320 Monthly Service 11.32 XCEL ENERGY INC 02/04/2021 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service 14.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 02/04/2021 101-1350-4320 Monthly Service 11.32 XCEL ENERGY INC 02/04/2021 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service 14.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 02/04/2021 101-1350-4320 Monthly Service 207.91 XCEL ENERGY INC 02/04/2021 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service 28.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 02/04/2021 101-1600-4320 Monthly Service 11.32 XCEL ENERGY INC 02/04/2021 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service 14.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 25,398.92 ZIEGLER INC 02/11/2021 101-1320-4140 Supplies 709.22 ZIEGLER INC 709.22 262,426.49 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (02/12/2021 - 10:22 AM)Page 7 of 7 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 22, 2021 Subject 2020 Citizen Action Request Forms Follow Up Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: L.3. Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, Office Manager File No: ATTACHMENTS: 2020 Citizen Action Request Forms Follow Up City Council Meeting DateFirst Name Last Name Council Action Requested Summary of Information Action taken Staff Contact for Followup Followup Action3/9/2020 Elizabeth Provinzino Zoning for short term rentalProperty next door was purchased for sole purpose of short term rental. It is a party house with 20+ vehicles parked on the streets and people outdoors at all hours smoking. As a resident I believe it is not acceptable to run a business in our residenƟal neighborhood. I suggest review if zoning to amend rules to limit the ability for short term rental as in VRBOSee next CARF Jake Foster See next3/9/2020 JOE PROVINZINOProperty next door 8348 stone creek drive chanhassen has turned into a rental house and now its all a party house renting out to people we have no clue who they are, the house a party house all week and weekends cars parked on both sides of the streets and parked two cars nest to eachother down the whole driveway, this past weekend there were atleast 25 cars all over and people in and out party , cooloers on the front stairs and back deck./1947 creekview ctSee 3/9/20 City Council minutesMayor Ryan encouraged calling VRBO as a first plan of action. She explained that the city had nuisance ordinances and that they should contact the CCSO if they should have a parking or noise complaint, etc. Jake Foster was assigned to follow up.Jake FosterMr. Provinzino will continue to work with the CCSO and Chanhassen CSOs to further document any violations by the short‐term rental next store. He was encouraged to call the CSO number or the CCSO non‐emergency number to any time the short‐term rental was causing a disturbance to further document the nuisance violations as the City does not currently have any short‐term rental ordinances in the City Code.4/27/2020 Maryanne and Gary HalamaRegarding Parcel 13‐ The Halamas request that the City Council authorize the release of the RelocaƟon Study. Regarding the property at 670 Creekwood Drive‐ The Halamas have waited since November 27, 2019 for Evergreens RelocaƟon Study. It is our understanding that Evergreens Relocation Study was completed on March 31, 2020.See 4/27/20 City Council minutes Charlie HowleyThe relocation study was originally sent to the Halama’s on 5/4/20, a revised study was provided to them on 8/4/20. Since that time, the acquisition has been finalized. City Council Meeting DateFirst Name Last Name Council Action Requested Summary of Information Action taken Staff Contact for Followup Followup Action4/27/2020 KEVIN ZAHLERPartner with the residents of Minnewashta Parkway to make it a safe residential street.Minnewashta Parkway is designated as a feeder road (arterial) between highway 7 and highway 5. This allows all vehicles to use the Parkway as a bypass between the two highways. This results in higher traffic volumes, industrial trucks, semis and multi‐axle dump trucks using the Parkway and at elevated speeds. This is also a safety issue, especially with the number of young families, young children and the proximity to the walking path along the Parkway. The correct bypass route should be highway 41, best guess on not using highway 41 is too many stop lights and not convenient. Now, with the upcoming resurfacing we all will be assessed for the Parkway improvement. Suggesting that the City of Chanhassen partner with the residents in restricting the type of traffic allowed on the Parkway and/or reduce the speed limit to 25 MPH with proper enforcement. We also need a stronger presence in monitoring the traffic on the Parkway. We need this to be a true residential street! This is also in the best interest of the City of Chanhassen in protecting people in their use of the path, Roundhouse Park and the city beach. Suggest we follow the lead of Minneapolis and St. Paul in their support of residents with their arterial roads.See 4/27/20 City Council minutes Charlie HowleyTwo driver’s speed feedback signs and new signing/striping for the pedestrian crossing at the King’s Road intersection was/are included in the Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation project. Since that time, additional discussions and commitments about this topic have been made as part of the AATP.5/11/2020 Wesley Martin Crosswalk paintingI want to discuss crosswalks; especially near parks or public trailsparental approval: Wesley is 9 years old and completed this form independently with the permission of his parents. cmCharlie HowleyThis location was reviewed and was added to our list of crosswalks to mark.5/26/2020 GARY AND MARYANNE HALAMARELOCATION STUDY GIVEN ON MAY 4TH 2020. ASKING TO RECONSIDER.REGARDING THE HIGHWAY 101 EXPANSION PROJECT, PARCEL 13; WE HAVE REQUESTED THAT THE RELOCATION STUDY PROVIDED, BE RECONSIDERED. THE DETAILED REQUEST WAS SENT TO STEVE CARLSON ‐EVERGREEN AND MAYOR RYAN ON TUESDAY, MAY 19, 2020. WE DESIRE TO KNOW THE STATUS OF THIS REQUEST.BEST REGARDS, THE HALAMASRefer to Charlie Howley Charlie HowleyThe relocation study was originally sent to the Halama’s on 5/4/20, a revised study was provided to them on 8/4/20. Since that time, the acquisition has been finalized. City Council Meeting DateFirst Name Last Name Council Action Requested Summary of Information Action taken Staff Contact for Followup Followup Action6/8/2020 David BishopRescind the Chanhassen contract with the Carver County Sheriff dept. and seek a better community services system.My narrative is that the Carver County Policing system is broken. Chanhassen can and very likely will be another suburb like Falcon Heights, where the community upheaved because a city agent killed an innocent black man, if it doesn't stop subcontracting out it's policing obligations with no authority over who and how it's agents behave. Protect the citizens, their property and the City, by regaining control of the Cities's police powers. CCSOSherrif Jason Kamerud attended the meeting and gave a presentation regarding the policies and practices of the CCSO.7/13/2020 Daniel BozanichNeed permission for Fire Department to use their cherry picker to assist installation of light to top of flagpole at Chapel Hill Academy.My name is Daniel Bozanich. I am a Boy Scout with Troop 347 in Eden Prairie. I am working on my Eagle Project for Chapel Hill Academy. Part of my project is to install solar lighting to the top of the flagpole. I would like permission to have the fire department help me install the solar lighting because the lighting fits on top of the flag pole, which is around 25 feet tall, and the school does not own a cherry picker to get up that high. I asked the fire department about it and they okayed the project, but they said I should get approval from the City Council.Fire Department agreed to support Daniel in his projectDon JohnsonFire Department Assisted Daniel in his Eagle Scout Project.7/27/2020 Gretchen Piper No action. Brief introduction as candidate for Minnesota state senate.No action required8/24/2020 Bob FinnI am looking for City Council guidance regarding the feasibility of naming relatively short sections of Arboretum Blvd and Audubon Rd adjacent to Paisley Park in honor of Prince Rogers Nelson.I am requesting consideration for naming a short section of State Hwy 5/Arboretum Blvd â€œPrince Rogers Nelson Boulevardâ€ , in addition to a short section of Audubon Rd â€œPaisley Park Wayâ€ , adjacent to Paisley Park. I do not know what the cost or process is for this request, I am merely at this point only looking for guidance to add a nice tribute to our long time late Chanhassen resident and music icon. I realize that Arboretum Blvd is a state highway, so that request would likely require state approval. Perhaps a City Engineer would be able to provide helpful information as well. Thank you in advance for your help and consideration.Charlie HowleyThis is still ongoing, but it has been agreed to honor Prince via memorial signage on Audubon, not an official street name change. We have the sign specs and will be obtaining some pricing. The requesting party will be responsible for funding the signs. With respect to TH5 (Arboretum Blvd), that is a State of MN matter, and not in the City’s authority. City Council Meeting DateFirst Name Last Name Council Action Requested Summary of Information Action taken Staff Contact for Followup Followup Action9/28/2020 Stephen ReddingtonI am asking to have the sign permit fee be waived since for my Eagle Scout project.I am constructing a sign for the Hope House that includes their address for my Eagle Scout project (Troop 409) and I'm looking to see if the permit fee can be waived since Hope House is a non profit as is the Boy Scouts (for my Eagle Scout project). I am looking to have this put in on Saturday, October 10.I am currently having the sign redesigned to include raised letters, and so have the sign no more than 5 feet. I wanted to get my request in to you so I can be added to the agenda for September 28 so the sign can be put in on October 10. But I can submit the design to the City Council later this week and/or at the meeƟng.I am also hoping that I may present to the City Council via Zoom for this request of the city council. thank you.Council agreed to waive the sign permit fee Sign permit fee waived.