Agenda and PacketAGENDA
PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION
TUESDAY, JULY 27, 2021, 7:00 P.M.
CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD
A.7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER
B.ROLL CALL
C.APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Commissioners may add or delete items at this time.
D.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS
E.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
Commission Procedures allow for presentations from the audience at this time. If a motion is
required, the item will be forwarded to the next available agenda to allow for publication and review
prior to consideration.
F.APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1.Approve Park & Recreation Commission Minutes dated June 22, 2021
G.NEW BUSINESS
1.Discuss Concept of Park and Recreation Referendum
H.OLD BUSINESS
I.REPORTS
1.2021 4th of July Celebration Evaluation
J.COMMISSION MEMBER COMMITTEE REPORTS
K.COMMISSION MEMBER PRESENTATIONS
L.ADMINISTRATIVE PACKET
M.ADJOURNMENT
PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Tuesday, July 27, 2021
Subject Approve Park & Recreation Commission Minutes dated June 22, 2021
Section APPROVAL OF MINUTES Item No: F.1.
Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, Office Manager File No:
PROPOSED MOTION
The Park and Recreation Commission approves the minutes from the June 22, 2021 Park & Recreation
Commission meeting.
Approval requires a simple majority vote of members present
ATTACHMENTS:
Summary Minutes
CHANHASSEN PARK AND
RECREATION COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES
JUNE 22, 2021
Chairman Tsuchiya called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Karl Tsuchiya, Sandy Sweetser, Matt Kutz, Don Vasatka, Heather
Markert (arrived at 7:33 p.m.), Youth Commissioner Chaehyun Lee, and Scott Fischer.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Jim Peck.
STAFF PRESENT: Jerry Ruegemer, Park and Recreation Director; Priya Tandon, Recreation
Supervisor; Jodi Sarles, Recreation Center Manager; Mitchell Czech, Recreation Supervisor;
Adam Beers, Park Superintendent; and Mary Blazanin, Senior Center Coordinator.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA.
Commissioner Kutz moved, Commissioner Sweetser seconded to approve the agenda as
presented. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0.
PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS. None.
VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. None.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
APPROVE PARK & RECREATION MINUTES DATED MAY 27, 2021
Commissioner Kutz moved, Commissioner Fischer seconded to approve the Minutes of the
Park and Recreation Commission Meeting dated May 25, 2021 as presented. All voted in
favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0.
NEW BUSINESS. None.
OLD BUSINESS. None.
REPORTS.
1. 2021 4TH OF JULY CELEBRATION PREVIEW
Recreation Supervisor Priya Tandon shared the 4th of July flyer with all of the scheduled events
and gave an overview of the celebration. The event will be on July 2-4 in downtown Chanhassen,
mainly surrounding City Center Park and Lake Ann Park. Participation levels can reach up to
Park and Recreation Commission Minutes – June 22, 2021
2
70,000 people over the course of the three-day celebration and they anticipate great attendance
this year. With the release of the Governor’s Executive Order the City was able to proceed fully
with the celebration in a mostly pre-pandemic fashion. Events include a family fun night and
carnival including rides, Taste of Chanhassen and Beer Garden, Business Expo, live music, street
dance, fishing contests, medallion hunt, sand sculpture contest, classic car show, the 4th of July
parade, and the annual fireworks display. The City has partnered with many organizations and
utilized various communication tools to get notice out about the celebration. A few events such
as bingo, t-shirts, pony rides, and petting zoo will return in 2022. The celebration will remain
compliant with all of the most current guidelines set forth by the State and the Minnesota
Department of Health; there will be hand washing stations and hand sanitizer readily available.
Ms. Tandon noted they are trying to incorporate QR codes that will bring people to the City
website to find the full schedule of events, registrations, parade map, etcetera.
Chairman Tsuchiya asked with the beer sales at Lake Ann, is there any revenue splitting with the
Rotary Club?
Ms. Tandon noted there is not a revenue splitting arrangement at this time. She believes much of
the revenues goes towards their scholarships and community programs.
Park and Recreation Director Ruegemer noted this is on a trial basis at Lake Ann, they will try it
this year and reassess depending on success.
2. CHANHASSEN RECREATION CENTER QUARTERLY UPDATE
Recreation Center Manager Jodi Sarles noted the Recreation Center is under construction and
meeting room walls are being replaced so they are about 12 weeks out from having 4 separate
rooms again. There will be much better sound proofing and the funding for that is $80,000. They
are also very excited that all COVID-19 restrictions have been lifted and it is great to see so
many faces at the facility. Ms. Sarles noted she worked with Mary Blazanin to put together the
Great Start to Summer Pack the Bus donation drive for Bountiful Basket and raised 1,000 pounds
in food and over $300 for the organization. She noted many families are getting back out in
dance programs, safety and babysitting programs, Fit for Life, T-ball, and sports camps.
3. SENIOR CENTER QUARTERLY REPORT
Senior Center Coordinator Mary Blazanin said the Senior Center is up and running as of June 1,
2021. She noted people were pounding down the doors and are very excited to be back. Events
include game groups, bingo, lunches, classes, mahjong for beginners, an earth day presentation,
and a Nordic walking class. Ms. Blazanin noted the seniors really enjoy the hybrid option of in-
person or Zoom programming and she can get instructors from all over the country who can
teach. She stated they are also resuming Day Trips this year and have several events scheduled
for the fall.
Park and Recreation Commission Minutes – June 22, 2021
3
4. PARK MAINTENANCE QUARTERLY UPDATE
Park Superintendent Adam Beers shared they did not really slow down during COVID-19 and
worked with Southwest Christian High School this year for their Senior Day to do some work at
the Recreation Center doing mulching and weeding. There is also a new Chanhassen sign near
Highway 5 and West 78th Street which was done in-house by the maintenance crew. He noted
they have also been working on irrigation, concession buildings, fields, events, and are now
getting ready for the 4th of July carnival. Mr. Beers stated the Lake Susan basketball court was
also a 25-year old infrastructure and was part of the Capital Improvement Plan; they are still
waiting for the bituminous to cure before they do the striping and put in the basketball poles.
They also have new playgrounds going in at Pheasant Hill and Carver Beach Park. Mr. Beers
gave a shout out to the seasonal employees as they are a huge help.
Commissioner Kutz had a resident ask him about the field conditions and noted one soccer field
had an issue with some holes.
Mr. Beers said City Center Park is on school property and the maintenance team stripes the field,
mows, and fertilizes. He noted they have major compaction issues due to the 4th of July carnival
area and are working to prep the area for the traffic and afterwards will aerify, try to fill in the
holes, and pray for good weather.
Commissioner Kutz asked about the fertilization schedule.
Mr. Beers replied they fertilize Lake Ann, Lake Susan, Bandimere, and City Center Parks three
times a year. Neighborhood parks are typically not fertilized but they do try to spray broadleaf
weeds on a 2-3 year cycle as they do not have the budget or the staff.
Mr. Ruegemer clarified in previous years they have had substantial rain before or during the
carnival set up which led to a lot of the rut and compromised turf conditions. He noted Mr. Beers
and his crew does their best to identify those spots and get them filled back in and repaired,
although sometimes the grass grows in and it is tough to spot. That is why they rely on coaches
and spectators to let them know if there is a spot that needs filling and they will be happy to do
that as they want a safe playing condition for the community.
Commissioner Vasatka asked about irrigation and how they balance keeping turf and grass alive
versus saving water.
Mr. Beers replied Chanhassen is very fortunate, noting Victoria had a water ban but they did not
run into that; they are aware of what they are putting out and whether it is worth it or not to do it.
Only the community parks and downtown West 78th Street are irrigated and only the sports fields
themselves get water.
Park and Recreation Commission Minutes – June 22, 2021
4
Commissioner Vasatka asked if the systems adjust on their own or if the City has to go in and
turn them up and down as the weather changes.
Mr. Beers said they put a central control system during his first two years. At the time they had
six employees and one was running around 8 hours a day setting clocks which was very
inefficient. With the central control system Mr. Beers can do it all from his desk. He clarified it
is based on evapotranspiration (ET) rates so it will adjust to the set calendar and if they get a bit
of rain it will self-adjust.
COMMISSION MEMBER COMMITTEE REPORTS.
Chair Tsuchiya is very excited for the 4th of July celebration and his family is staying in town
because of it.
Commissioner Fischer asked the process of getting something approved before the Council.
Mr. Ruegemer replied first the Commission would have a discussion and if it warrants adding it
to a future agenda they could do that which would give Staff time to prepare a report. If it is a
programming matter, they can handle it right within this body; if it is an expenditure, it would
then be forwarded on the City Council for consideration.
The Council discussed doing a joint tour of the community parks and areas as has been done in
the past, as well as a sit-down with the City Council.
Commissioner Markert asked where they are with Prince’s land (The Park subdivision west of
Lake Ann).
Chair Tsuchiya replied they own it but there is not any money to do anything with it.
Mr. Ruegemer shared he will be presenting at the work session the following Monday on the
topic of the referendum. Their first successful bond referendum was in 1969 which was the
purchase of Lake Ann Park from the Welter Family. They will be going through that exercise
and discussing the direction the City Council would like to go.
COMMISSION MEMBER PRESENTATIONS. None.
ADMINISTRATIVE PACKET.
1. RILEY PURGATORY BLUFF CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT 50TH
ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION INVITATION
Park and Recreation Commission Minutes – June 22, 2021
5
ADJOURNMENT.
Commissioner Sweetser moved, Commissioner Kutz seconded to adjourn the meeting. All
voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. The Park and
Recreation Commission meeting was adjourned at 7:57 p.m.
Submitted by Jerry Ruegemer
Park and Recreation Director
Prepared by Kim Meuwissen
Office Manager
PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Tuesday, July 27, 2021
Subject Discuss Concept of Park and Recreation Referendum
Section NEW BUSINESS Item No: G.1.
Prepared By Jerry Ruegemer, Park and Recreation
Director
File No:
DISCUSSION
The City and its citizens have always held our park and trail system in high regard. Community survey results continue
to rate park and recreation services and amenities high; our residents find them essential, which adds to an increased
quality of life.
Park and trail system improvements have been discussed recently, and the City has taken steps to listen to our
residents and plan for future generations. The City developed and produced two important planning tools: The Park
and Recreation System Plan in 2017, and The Lake Ann Park Preserve Feasibility Study in 2019. These documents
provide background and guidance moving forward to the next development phases of our park system. With the
acquisition of the Lake Ann Park Preserve property, staff has heard from many residents inquiring about the project
scope and timeline, so there is interest in this project's completion.
In order to complete largerscale projects, identifying funding sources is needed. The City of Chanhassen has paid for
park and trail improvements through a variety of ways, but mainly has selected referendums to cover the cost of more
impactful improvements. Historically, the City has held five referendums, with the first being November 4, 1969. This
first referendum passed, and the land that became Lake Ann Park was purchased from the Welter Family for
$250,000. The last park referendum of $4.9 million was passed 24 years ago, on June 14, 1997. The 1997
referendum included improvements to neighborhood parks, community parks, preserve open space, and also
constructed and expanded our city's trail system.
The City's 20212024 Strategic Plan identifies "creating new innovative places and spaces" as a desired outcome.
Parks may be a place where this goal can be accomplished.
Staff looks forward to discussing the concept of a Parks Referendum to further enhance our city's park and trail
system.
RECOMMENDATION
No action required. Staff is interested in discussion with the Park and Recreation Commission related to the direction
and concept of a Park and Recreation Referendum.
PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORTTuesday, July 27, 2021SubjectDiscuss Concept of Park and Recreation ReferendumSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: G.1.Prepared By Jerry Ruegemer, Park and RecreationDirector File No: DISCUSSIONThe City and its citizens have always held our park and trail system in high regard. Community survey results continueto rate park and recreation services and amenities high; our residents find them essential, which adds to an increasedquality of life. Park and trail system improvements have been discussed recently, and the City has taken steps to listen to ourresidents and plan for future generations. The City developed and produced two important planning tools: The Parkand Recreation System Plan in 2017, and The Lake Ann Park Preserve Feasibility Study in 2019. These documentsprovide background and guidance moving forward to the next development phases of our park system. With theacquisition of the Lake Ann Park Preserve property, staff has heard from many residents inquiring about the projectscope and timeline, so there is interest in this project's completion.In order to complete largerscale projects, identifying funding sources is needed. The City of Chanhassen has paid forpark and trail improvements through a variety of ways, but mainly has selected referendums to cover the cost of moreimpactful improvements. Historically, the City has held five referendums, with the first being November 4, 1969. Thisfirst referendum passed, and the land that became Lake Ann Park was purchased from the Welter Family for$250,000. The last park referendum of $4.9 million was passed 24 years ago, on June 14, 1997. The 1997referendum included improvements to neighborhood parks, community parks, preserve open space, and alsoconstructed and expanded our city's trail system. The City's 20212024 Strategic Plan identifies "creating new innovative places and spaces" as a desired outcome.Parks may be a place where this goal can be accomplished. Staff looks forward to discussing the concept of a Parks Referendum to further enhance our city's park and trailsystem.RECOMMENDATION
No action required. Staff is interested in discussion with the Park and Recreation Commission related to the direction
and concept of a Park and Recreation Referendum.
ATTACHMENTS:
Lake Ann Park Preserve Feasibility Study
Parks & Recreation System Plan
LAKE ANN
PARK PRESERVE
FEASIBILITY
STUDY
NOVEMBER 25, 2019
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL
Mayor Elise Ryan
Council Member Dan Campion
Council Member Julia Coleman
Council Member Jerry McDonald
Council Member Bethany Tjornhom
CHANHASSEN PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION
Jim Boettcher, Chair
Meredith Petouvis, Vice Chair
Matt Kutz
Haley Pemrick
Joseph Scanlon
Sandy Sweetser
Karl Tsuchiya
CHANHASSEN CITY STAFF
Todd Hoffman, Park and Recreation Director
Adam Beers, Park Superintendent
Jill Sinclair, Environmental Resource Specialist
Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director
Todd Gerhardt, City Manager
INTRODUCTION 1-1
Study Purpose 1-1
Project Background 1-2
EXISTING CONDITIONS 2-1
Site Analysis 2-1
Natural Resource Analysis 2-4
CONCEPT PLAN 3-1
Concept Plan 3-1
IMPLEMENTATION 4-1
Cost Estimate 4-1
Permitting 4-3
Project Phasing 4-4
Construction Access and Staging 4-4
Funding Sources 4-5
LAKE ANN FEASIBILITY STUDY II
STUDY PURPOSE
This study addresses feasibility and pricing for the creation of a trail network
at the newly acquired City property known as the Lake Ann Park Preserve.
The study’s purpose is to understand the design limitations of the site,
develop a conceptual development plan, and estimate the overall project
cost.
The design has been vetted through public outreach, staff input, and Park
and Recreation Commission and City Council review. The design will be
further refined as construction documents are developed. The design shown
in this document is used to develop cost estimates and changes may impact
the final cost of development of the park preserve.
Pricing reflects planning level estimates that take into account site conditions
as they are understood today. Final costs may vary based on future labor
and material costs, inflation, and unforeseen circumstances that may be
discovered as part of the next phase of design and engineering.
PROJECT BACKGROUND
LOCATION
Chanhassen is a city of approximately 26,000 people in the southwest part
of the Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area. The city is often listed among
the best places to live nationally, in part based on the strength of the outdoor
recreation offerings of parks, trails, and lakes.
Lake Ann Park Preserve
Lake Ann
Lake Lucy
Arboretum Blvd / 5Galpin BlvdHazeltine BlvdPowers BlvdLake Ann Park
Greenwood
Shores Park
1 INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION 1-1 NOVEMBER 2019
LOCAL CONTEXT
LAKE ANN AND LAKE LUCY
Lake Lucy sits at the northern portion of the parkland. The lake is 87.5 acres
and reaches a depth of 20 feet. The Lake Lucy watershed is 994 acres and
encompasses many of the neighborhoods to the northwest, as well as some
wetland and park space. The wetland portion of Lake Ann Park Preserve
drains into Lake Lucy.
Lake Lucy then drains into Lake Ann on the south side of the site. Lake Ann
gets up to 45 feet deep with a surface area of 115.7 acres. The Lake Ann
watershed is much smaller at 252 acres, which is nearly a 1 to 1 ratio of lake
surface and land surface area. The watershed is made up of parkland and
undeveloped private land. This results in very little negative impact to the
water flowing overland into Lake Ann.
ADJACENT GREEN SPACE
Lake Ann Park sits on the south shore of Lake Ann, between the lake and
Highway 5. The park has ballfields to the south, playgrounds, a beach, and
picnic shelters near the water, and wooded trails on the west. The park is
a popular community park in Chanhassen. It is actively programmed and
hosts many visitors and events. The parkland also encompasses a trail
corridor along the eastern edge of the lake. The corridor width varies, but is
is typically approximately 75’ wide.
Greenwood Shores Park is a public park on the northeast corner of Lake
Ann. There is a swimming beach and a picnic shelter.
While the land to the southwest of Lake Ann is not public, it is worth noting
that the property has not been intensely developed and helps Lake Ann
retain its natural, undeveloped character.
NEW NEIGHBORHOOD
Lake Lucy and Lake Ann define much of the north and south edges of
the new parkland, but the new neighborhood development to the west
will also play a role in the character of the park. Trail connections to that
neighborhood will allow residents of Chanhassen to access the parkland
from the west side of the city.
Lake Ann
Lake Lucy
P
ow
e
r
s
B
l
v
d
Galpin BlvdHazeltine Blvd Lake Lucy2018What’s happening
Dive deeper
Aquatic plants
Dunne, M. and Newman, R. 2017. Aquatic Plant Community of
Lakes Lucy, Mitchell, Susan, Riley and Staring: Annual Report for
2016. University of Minnesota.
JaKa, J. and Newman, R. 2014. Aquatic Plant Community of
Lakes Ann, Lotus, Lucy, Mitchell, Susan, Riley and Staring within
the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed: Final Report 2009 –
2014. University of Minnesota.
Wenck Associates Inc. 2015. Lake Lucy Aquatic Plant
Management Plan.
Watershed study
BARR Engineering. 2013. Lake Lucy and Lake Ann:
Use Attainability Analysis.
Carp management
Bajer P.G., Headrick,M., Miller B. D. and Sorensen
P. W. 2014. Development and implementation of
a sustainable strategy to control common carp in
Riley Creek Chain of Lakes. U of M.
Stormwater ponds
RPBCWD. 2013. Stormwater pond project.
Interested in learning more? Explore the following reports on our website.
18681 Lake Drive East
Chanhassen, MN
55317
Contact usDISTRICT OFFICE CONTACT INFO
952.607.6512
info@rpbcwd.org
rpbcwd.org
FIND US ON
instagram
facebook
twitter
and find out how you
can get involved
Zebra mussels, an aquatic invasive species (AIS) were discovered in Lake Riley in October 2018. This is the first lake within the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District where they have been spotted. Zebra mussels live in dense clusters and can spread quickly. They attach to docks, boats, rocks, logs, and other surfaces in the lake, and can threaten recreation and the underwater ecosystem. The District will continue to monitor the zebra mussel population in Lake Riley, and work with our partners to try to prevent this species from spreading to other lakes. ZEBRA MUSSELS FOUND IN LAKE RILEYDecreasing pollution, beautifying your yard, and creating habitat are all possible through a cost-share grant with the watershed district. The district’s cost-share grant program was created to help community members implement clean water projects. These could be projects that conserve water, like rainwater reuse systems, or projects that clean water, like raingardens. Awards: up to $5000
(25% homeowner match)
Technical help available
Interested? Contact:
952-607-6481
mjordan@rpbcwd.org
GRANTS AVAILABLE FOR PROJECTS THAT HELP PROTECT CLEAN WATER Lake Lucy is the headwaters to Riley Creek.
Water flows out of Lucy to Lake Ann and then
Riley Creek. On its way south to the Minnesota
River, Riley Creek passes through Lakes Susan,
Rice Marsh, and Riley.
Size 88 acres
Volume 558 acre-ft
Average depth 6.5 ft
Max depth 20 ft
Watershed size 997 acres
Land draining directly into 111 acres
MPCA lake classification Shallow
Impairment listing Mercury
Trophic status Eutrophic
Common fish Bluegill, Northern Pike,
Yellow Bullhead
Invasive species
Curlyleaf Pondweed,
Eurasian Watermilfoil,
Common Carp
Water that falls anywhere within the white border
drains to Lake Lucy.
CHARACTERISTICS
WATERSHED BOUNDARIES
45% Residential
14% Open Water
39% Open Space
LAND USE in the Lake Lucy Watershed
N
2% Commercial
Celebrating our 50th Anniversary in 2019. Learn more at www.rpbcwd.org/50years
You can help!
Remember to
always clean,
drain, and dry any
watercraft and
equipment when
leaving a lake.
Lake Ann
Located in Chanhassen, Lake Ann is at the
headwaters of Riley Creek. Over the past 40
years, Lake Ann has consistently met Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency clean water standards.
What’s happening
DIVE DEEPER
Aquatic plants
Johnson, J. 2017. 2017 Aquatic Plan Survey: Lake Ann.
JaKa, J. and Newman, R. 2014. Aquatic Plant Community of
Lakes Ann, Lotus, Lucy, Mitchell, Susan, Riley and Staring
within the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed: Final
Report 2009 – 2014. University of Minnesota.
Watershed study
BARR Engineering. 2013. Lake Lucy and Lake Ann: Use
Attainability Analysis.
Lake Ann
Lake Lucy
Powers BlvdN
Stormwater ponds
RPBCWD. 2013. Stormwater pond project.
Carp management
Bajer P.G., Headrick,M., Miller B. D. and Sorensen
P. W. 2014. Development and implementation
of a sustainable strategy to control common
carp in Riley Creek Chain of Lakes. University of
Minnesota.
2018
Size 119 acres
Volume 2005 acre-ft
Average depth 16.8 ft
Max depth 40 ft
Watershed size 250 acres
Land draining directly into 105 acres
MPCA lake classification Deep
Impairment listing Mercury
Trophic status Mesotrophic
Common fish Bluegill, White Sucker,
Black Crappie, Yellow Perch
Invasive species
Curlyleaf Pondweed,
Eurasian Watermilfoil,
Common Carp, Brittle
Naiad
Water that falls anywhere within the
white border drains to Lake Ann.
Interested in learning more? Explore the following reports on our website.
18681 Lake Drive East
Chanhassen, MN
55317
Contact usDISTRICT OFFICECONTACT INFO
952.607.6512
info@rpbcwd.org
rpbcwd.org
FIND US ON
instagram
facebook
twitter
and find out how you
can get involved
In Summer 2018, District staff completed a series of fish surveys on local lakes,
including Lake Ann. Staff set fyke nets near the shoreline, and fish swam in and
became trapped. After a 24-hour period, they removed the nets and took an
inventory of all fish inside, before releasing the fish back into the lake.
These surveys help us to better understand the wildlife in local lakes, and
assists the District in planning for future management. Species found in
Lake Ann include black crappie, bluegill, common carp, green sunfish, hybrid
sunfish, largemouth bass, northern pike, pumpkinseed, yellow bullhead, yellow
perch. Nine painted turtles and one snapping turtle were also recorded during
this survey.
LAKE ANN FISH SURVEY
CHARACTERISTICS
WATERSHED BOUNDARIES
Hwy 5
6% Farmland
2% Residential
45% Open Water
47% Open Space
LAND USE in the Lake Ann Watershed
Celebrating our 50th Anniversary in 2019. Learn more at www.rpbcwd.org/50years
ZEBRA MUSSELS FOUND IN LAKE RILEY
Zebra mussels, an aquatic invasive species (AIS) were discovered in Lake Riley in
October 2018. This is the first lake within the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed
District where they have been spotted. Zebra mussels live in dense clusters and can
spread quickly. They attach to docks, boats, rocks, logs, and other surfaces in the lake,
and can threaten recreation and the underwater ecosystem.
The District will continue to monitor the zebra mussel population in Lake Riley, and work
with our partners to try to prevent this species from spreading to other lakes. You can
help! Remember to always clean, drain, and dry any watercraft and equipment when
leaving a lake.
The beach at Lake Ann Park Greenwood Shores Park
The watersheds for Lake Lucy (top) and
Lake Ann (bottom)
LAKE ANN PARK PRESERVE FEASIBILITY STUDY
1
A HISTORY OF PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE
None of the land around Lake Ann has been heavily developed. Historically,
it has been farmed or kept in a more naturalized state of forest or prairie.
Private property owners have preserved the land, which remains a unique
asset for the community. The trees and open space along the edges of the
lake in all directions contribute to the ecological, recreational, and scenic
value of Lake Ann within the community.
The site has long been identified in City planning documents for a trail
to complete a loop around Lake Ann. Even as far back as the 1970s, a
conceptual trail has been shown in the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
The City acquired the parkland for Lake Ann Park in 1969 through a
$250,000 referendum, choosing to preserve the shoreline for natural and
water based recreation, and locating ballfields to the south between the lake
and Highway 5.
In the 1980s, with the development of the parcel to the east of Lake Ann, the
City of Chanhassen was able to secure property along the lake to create a
paved trail and continue the loop for the public.
The development of the Greenwood Shores neighborhood also brought the
dedication of Greenwood Shores Park, with a public beach on Lake Ann, as
well as frontage on Lake Lucy.
When the property that Lake Ann Park Preserve sits on became available
for development, the City worked with the housing developer that purchased
the property to dedicate and otherwise preserve the eastern half of the site,
including approximately 40 acres of wetland and 60 acres of upland with
over a mile of shoreline on Lake Ann and Lake Lucy.
This long term approach to the preservation of Lake Ann’s shoreline for a trail
loop will have preserved approximately 3/4ths of the way around the lake,
with a desire to complete the loop if/when the current owner of the private
property decides to sell or subdivide the land.
A sign at Lake Ann Park showing the planned
eventual connection of a trail loop around the
lake.
INTRODUCTION 1-3 NOVEMBER 2019
PARK SITE
The recently acquired land is approximately 115 acres approximately split
with 40 acres of wetland and 60 acres of upland. The remaining 15 acres will
largely be used for grading and stormwater management related to the new
neighborhood development.
The site boasts approximately 3,600 feet of shoreline on Lake Lucy and
3,400 feet on Lake Ann.
2EXISTING CONDITIONS
The Creek
The Overlook
The Edge
The Cathedral
High Quality Forest
Visual ImpactsVisual
Impacts
Views
Compelling Hill
Lake Connections
Greenwood
Shores Park
Edges of Forest, Wetland, & Grassland
LAKE ANN PARK PRESERVE FEASIBILITY STUDY
2
Left: The Creek - Between Lake Ann and Lake Lucy
Right: The Overlook - A unique hill feature that feels like a great place to stop and rest
Left: The Cathedral - Maples have raced to fill in the canopy as Oaks have fallen
Right: The Edge - A surprise when one emerges from the woods and into the sunlight
EXISTING CONDITIONS 2-2 NOVEMBER 2019
TOPOGRAPHY
The wetland complex running through the middle of the site separates the
new neighborhood from the parkland. The east parkland sits lower than the
neighborhood to the west, but well above the lake elevations.
The terrain is rolling hills with a few notable nobs that provide long views
across the lakes, especially during the winter when leaves are down.
WETLANDS
The largest wetland is a mix of forested wetland and emergent marshes with
a few small pockets of open water. The wetland drains into Lake Lucy.
There are also small perched ponds in the wooded areas of the upland park,
all less than 1/2 an acre.
LAKE ANN PARK PRESERVE FEASIBILITY STUDY
2
Left: Wooded wetland perched in the middle of the forested area
Right: Wetland at the southwest corner of the woods looking towards the site of the new neighborhood
FLOODPLAINS
Floodplains do not generally impact the site,
except in areas that area already wet. This
does not affect the potential paved trails
in the upland areas, but any crossing of a
wetland that also has floodplain designation
will require additional permitting and design
considerations outlined in the following
chapter.
SOILS
As part of the planning process, soil borings
were completed along the trail alignment.
These provide a better understanding of the
soil conditions on site than the Soil Survey
Geographic Database collected through the
National Cooperative Soil Survey distributed
by the Natural Resources Conservation
Service (NRCS). Please see the appendix for
soil boring information.
EXISTING CONDITIONS 2-4 NOVEMBER 2019
NATURAL RESOURCES ANALYSIS
OVERVIEW
The proposed trail is located within undeveloped land, which is bordered
by two lakes, single-family residential development, and city parkland.
Approximately 5,000 feet of shoreline form the northern and eastern edges of
the property. The western portion of the property is dominated by a 30-acre
wetland complex, which flows north into Lake Lucy through a natural overflow.
The site has been isolated from public access for many years, which has
allowed a high quality maple basswood forest to flourish in the central area
of the property. Invasive species, such as a buckthorn and garlic mustard are
creeping into the site along the edges of the property, but much of the area is
high quality, and represents historic vegetative communities.
EVALUATION METHOD
Visits to the site were completed on July 16, and September 19, 2019. Plants
were observed and photographed in mid and late-summer conditions.
PLANT COMMUNITIES
A high-quality, old growth maple basswood forest dominates the central part of
the property, which is an approximately 15-acre contiguous area. The high and
enclosed canopy of the maple trees forms a mostly solid shade cover over the
forest floor. This has limited the growth of shrubs and herbaceous layers, as it
is light-limited, however where breaks are present, an abundant herbaceous
layer and numerous tree seedlings are present, which indicate a natural seed
bank is present. Naturally downed trees are located throughout the property,
which provide habitat for wildlife and various fungi, lichen, and moss. The
forest floor is covered with maple seedlings, leaf litter, and an abundance
native plant species. Native species observed on the site during the two site
visits are listed in Table 1. This is not a comprehensive survey, but represents
the common and most noticeable species present.
The edges of the site have been affected by various invasive and aggressive
species, such as buckthorn, reed canary grass, and narrow-leaved cattails.
The most prominent invasive species on the property is buckthorn, which is
dense within the forested fringes and adjacent private properties. Several
seedlings and large 2-3” caliper trees were observed on the site. The
buckthorn was seen on all edges of the site and will likely migrate to the central
area of the site if not managed aggressively to contain the natural expansion.
Invasive, non-native species observed on the site are listed in Table 2.
Table 1. Native Species
ANIMAL HABITAT
While not an exhaustive list, the site visits did observe the following animals
or evidence of the following animals. The abundant habitat suggests there
are likely more species than are identified here.
• Deer
• Turkey
• Coyote
• Frogs
• Scarlet Tanager
LAKE ANN PARK PRESERVE FEASIBILITY STUDY
2
Buckthorn Edges
(Approximate)Buckthorn Edges(Approximate)Reed Ca
n
a
r
y
G
r
a
s
s
EXISTING CONDITIONS 2-6 NOVEMBER 2019
NATIVE SPECIES SCIENTIFIC NAME LOCATION VIEWED NOTES
Ostrich fern Matteuccia
struthiopteris
northern edge of
property adjacent
to Lake Lucy
Wood Fern?Dryopteris spp.Upland, central
areas
Jack-in-the-Pulpit Arisaema
triphyllum throughout the site
Zig Zag Goldenrod Solidago flexicaulis Upland, central
areas
Lindley’s Aster Symphyotrichum
ciliolatum
Upland, central
areas
Swamp Smartweed Persicaria amphibia Wet, low areas
Pennsylvania
Sedge
Carex
pennsylvanica
Wet, low areas,
central part of site
American Hog
Peanut
Amphicarpaea
bracteata
northern and
western edges and
into the center
property-ground
cover
Aggressive native
Wild Cucumber Echinocystis lobata Western and
northern areas Aggressive native
Canadian Wood
Nettle Laporta canadensis Moist areas Aggressive native
Sugar Maple tree Acer saccharum Central area
Northern Red Oak
tree Quercus rubra Upland Oak wilt concerns
Ironwood Ostrya virginiana Western edge
Paper Birch Betula papyrifera Southwestern area
American
Basswood Tilia americana
Cottonwood Populus deltoides Northwestern area
Table 2: Invasive Species
INVASIVE PLANT
SPECIES SCIENTIFIC NAME LOCATION VIEWED THREAT LEVEL
Glossy Buckthorn
aka European
Buckthorn
Frangula alnus
northern and
western edges of
property
High
Common
Buckthorn
Rhamnus
cathartica
northern and
western edges of
property
High
Garlic mustard Alliaria petiolata northwestern edge
of property Moderate
Reed canary grass Southern wet edge
of property
LAKE ANN PARK PRESERVE FEASIBILITY STUDY
2
American Hog Peanut
Jack-in-the Pulpit
Blue Beech or Ironwood??
Pennsylvania Sedge Ostrich Fern Ironwood
Smartweed Sugar Maple Sugar Maple
Glandular or Spreading Wood
Fern??
Zig Zag Goldenrod Lindley’s Aster
Native Species
Garlic Mustard Reed Canary GrassCommon Buckthorn European or Glossy Buckthorn
Invasive Species
EXISTING CONDITIONS 2-8 NOVEMBER 2019
CONCEPT PLAN
The concept plan was developed based on input gathered from the public,
elected and appointed officials, and City of Chanhassen staff. The input was
combined with an analysis of the physical characteristics and constraints to
inform the layout, design, and features of the plan. The plan is based on the
following 5 principles:
»Continue trails around Lake Ann to allow for an eventual loop
»Preserve the land as a valued natural area in Chanhassen
»Connect residents with nature, trails, and parks
»Protect the ecological functioning (habitat, water quality) of the site
»Celebrate Lake Ann, Lake Lucy, and this property as community
amenities
TRAILS
PAVED TRAILS
A continuation of the paved trails at Lake Ann Park will allow a wide range
of users to use the trail system and experience the park preserve. Paving
allows walkers, runners, those in wheelchairs or with walkers, bicyclists, and
skaters to enjoy the trails.
Trails are designed to be 10 feet wide to safely accommodate various users
going in each direction.
Layout of the trails on the plan is generalized and a final alignment will
require an on site flagging of the trail to better retain the vegetation and tree
canopy on site. This also helps combat the spread of invasive species, many
of which thrive in disturbed areas and outcompete native species in these
locations.
PUBLIC INPUT
Throughout the City’s Park System
Plan process, the desire for a
connection around Lake Ann
emerged as a key initiative for the
City.
Later, as part of the Feasibility Study
process, the planning team solicited
input from residents. Through in
person attendance at events and with
an on-line survey, the team gathered
523 responses.
Residents were offered alternatives
to different development approaches
of the property. The key findings from
the public input were:
»Strong desire to protecting the
natural environment, especially
sensitive habitat
»People are excited about trails.
Sentiment mixed about material,
but leans toward paved trails
»Varied experiences for trail users
(interact with the lake, different
views, see unique areas)
Surveys were provided online and in
person to solicit input from the public Lucy Ridge LnRuby LnSapphire LnAt Rice Marsh Lake, the City of Chanhassen utilized on-site flagging for final trail locations to
avoid trees and preserve the canopy of the site. The effects can be seen in the aerial, with the
site located trail to the left of the red line, compared with the trail design on the right side,
and the obvious cut in the canopy.
3CONCEPT PLAN
LAKE ANN PARK PRESERVE FEASIBILITY STUDY 3-1
Lake LucyLake AnnLake Ann ParkGreenwood Shores ParkGalpin BlvdMajestic WayTopaz DrUtica LnUtica LnTecumseh LnBrinker StWalnut CurveWindmill DrLucy Ridge LnRuby LnSapphire LnPaved Trails - Built by CityPaved Trails - Built by DeveloperPaved Trails - Rebuilt by CityBoardwalkPrefabricated BridgeNatural Surface TrailsReconstructed Trail to Lake Ann Park - WidenReconstructed Trail to Lucy Ridge Ln - Address drainageNatural Resource Preservation/Invasive Species ControlProtect center of site from Buckthorn ExpansionManage/Treat/Remove invasivesPreserve wetlandsField align trails to retain tree canopySignage and WayfindingNatural resources/historical educationTell the story of Lake Ann trail loop planningProvide directional signage for trail usersNatural Surface Trail Waterbars and drainage crossings as neededNew paved trailNew paved trailBoardwalkSet elevation >floodOrient for viewsBoardwalkSet elevation >floodNew Paved TrailBuilt by developerNew Paved TrailBuilt by developerCoordinate grading for pond and boardwalkBridgeSet elevation to allow watercraft underParking+/- 6 spacesN200’600’400’CONCEPT PLAN 3-2 NOVEMBER 2019
Due to the soils on site, the paved trails will require a sturdier section than
is typical. In order to mitigate against the high water table and challenging
freeze/thaw cycles the overall section of the trail will be thicker and
incorporate sub-surface structure and drainage. While this represents a
larger up-front investment, it is a better long term approach, increasing the
life span and reducing the maintenance demands.
A typical trail section (left) and the recommended trail section (right) show the difference in construction methods needed to create a robust,
sustainable trail. While a normal trail section may only require 3 inches of bituminous over 6 inches of compacted class 5 gravel, trails in this
location may require up to 2 feet of muck excavation, geotextile fabric, select granular borrow, drain tile, geogrid, and 4 inches of coarse aggregate
in addition to the 6 inches of class 5 and 3 inches of bituminous.
RECONSTRUCTION OF PAVED TRAILS
An existing section of paved trail connecting to the northern part of the
park from Lucy Ridge Road will need to be reconstructed. The trail was
constructed originally during the development of the neighborhood and has
aged significantly.
Depending on the staging and construction access points, the trail from Lake
Ann Park to Greenwood Shores Park may also need to be reconstructed. In
order to minimize the impacts to the Greenwood Shores neighborhood, the
main construction access is anticipated to come from Lake Ann Park and
follow the trail along the east side of the lake. The wear and tear caused by
construction vehicles will necessitate the reconstruction of the trail.
Illustrative sections
Not for construction
Existing Trail Condition from the Lucy Ridge
Neighborhood
LAKE ANN PARK PRESERVE FEASIBILITY STUDY 3-3
NATURAL SURFACE TRAILS
In addition to the paved trail system, some of the natural surface trails will
be preserved and enhanced to provide users with a secondary experience
of the natural areas of the site. In some instances there are locations where
water must be managed. In these cases, minimal improvements such as
small culverts, waterbars, and plank boardwalks will be required to avoid
negatively impacting the trails. The trails that exist today see minimal use
and are not degraded as quickly as could happen with the transition to public
park land. A key to preventing the degradation will be to manage water and
avoid erosion.
Left: The image illustrates a strategy for keeping trail users on the specified trail and out of the erodable creek bank.
Right: Illustration of a look out off the side of the bridge. This could also include benches.
BRIDGES AND BOARDWALKS
LAKE ANN/LAKE LUCY CROSSING
The creek between Lake Ann and Lake Lucy will be traversed with a
prefabricated pedestrian bridge set on precast concrete abutments. The
bridge should be wide enough to accommodate two way traffic and people
stopping to enjoy the creek and lake views on both sides. This could include
space for seating.
The bridge needs to be built high enough to stay out of the floodplain, and to
allow for the passage of small watercraft (canoes, kayaks, fishing boats, etc.)
under the bridge.
The design of the approaches to the bridge should continue the railings/
fencing well beyond the bridge so that users have committed to staying on
the bridge and are not drawn down to the water’s edge. This is to reduce
erosion and degradation of the banks of the creek.
CONCEPT PLAN 3-4 NOVEMBER 2019
LAKE LUCY/WETLAND CROSSING
Due to the long approaches and mucky soils, the creek that drains the
wetland into Lake Lucy will be crossed with a boardwalk. The boardwalk
should be oriented to provide views of the wetland and the forest. To the
extent possible, it should also be aligned to minimize the visual impact of the
grading and housing being built in the new neighborhood.
WETLAND CROSSING
A boardwalk will also be used to connect the south part of the new
neighborhood to the park preserve. The boardwalk is located to minimize
the length of the crossing. The boardwalk will also go across a Metropolitan
Council Sewer Interceptor that is in the wetland. In order to allow crews to
maintain that pipe, a portion of the boardwalk will need to be built with a
longer steel span and be removable on a temporary basis. Maintenance of
the interceptor is not a common occurrence, but the boardwalk does need to
allow for it on an occasional basis.
BOARDWALK DESIGN
Both boardwalks will be designed to accommodate 2 way pedestrian and
bicycle traffic. They also need to be able to handle vehicle loads such as
maintenance pick-up trucks. The boardwalks should be at least 12 feet clear
width with 4-6 foot railings. Boardwalks should also incorporate look outs to
allow trail users the chance to enjoy and experience the scenery.
The boardwalks are anticipated to utilize helical anchor supported H-10
design, where anchors are essentially drilled into the ground until they reach
soils that will support the design load.
As discussed above, a portion of one boardwalk will need to be removeable
to allow for occasional maintenance to the Metropolitan Council Interceptor.
In this instance, the span between helical anchors is lengthened and the
structure of the boardwalk under this section is supported with steel I-beams.
The elevation of the bottom of the boardwalk needs to be set above the
floodplain elevations so as not to impact the flow of water in flood events.
GREENWOOD SHORES
PARK PARKING LOT
The addition of a small parking lot at
Greenwood Shores Park will help mitigate
parking in the neighborhood and allow
residents to park vehicles at Greenwood
Shores Park while using the beach, picnic
shelter, and park preserve trails. This will
be done by relocating the existing gate and
paving 6 spaces off of the entry drive.Uti
c
a
L
a
n
e
Relocated
Gate
To Lake Ann Park
To Lake Ann
Park Preserve
LAKE ANN PARK PRESERVE FEASIBILITY STUDY 3-5
Left: The image illustrates the helical anchor structural support system that will be used for the boardwalks
Right: Illustration of an extended span with steel I-beams as will be needed for the Metropolitan Council Regional Sewer Interceptor Crossing.
Both Images illustrate the character of the finished boardwalk in forested and wetland marsh environments.
CONCEPT PLAN 3-6 NOVEMBER 2019
RECOMMENDATIONS
PRESERVATION OF EXISTING HIGH QUALITY PLANT
COMMUNITIES
NATURAL RESOURCE PRESERVATION
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT
With the beaches that are available to the public at Lake Ann Park and
Greenwood Shores Park, the new park land design is not focused on
bringing people to the water’s edge, unless they are on a sustainable
surface such as a bridge, boardwalk, or dock. This will help reduce erosion
and degradation of the shoreline as well as minimize the opportunity for the
spread of invasive species to these locations.
WETLAND MANAGEMENT
The design of the park incorporates a 50 foot minimum buffer from the
wetlands in all locations where feasible. This meets or exceeds the guidance
provided by the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District for wetland
buffers. In instances where trails are built within standard buffer zones, the
locations are driven by a need to minimize erosion and grading impacts, or to
cross wetlands on sustainable, constructed surfaces and keep people out of
the wetlands themselves.
FOREST MANAGEMENT
Education, signage, and paved trails will direct future park users to avoid
accessing the high quality areas of the property in order to preserve the
existing natural resources of the site. Encroachment into these areas will
directly damage vegetation, but can also spread invasive species.
Etiquette signage and park rules should be posted at all entrances to the
park to inform visitors of the value of the high-quality forest community.
Trails should be clearly defined and direct visitors to access only areas
where trails exist rather than promoting hiking through the high-quality areas
of the park.
Educational and interpretive signage along the trails should point out
significant species and features of the forest and warn of the effects of
invasive species.
INVASIVE SPECIES MANAGEMENT
The highest priority for management of natural resources on the property
is to address the existing buckthorn. Management methods should be
evaluated based on cost, success rate, and the size of the existing trees.
Potential methods include:
• Forestry mowing with follow up treatment of stumps
• Cutting and application of glyphosate to stumps
• Goat grazing of seedlings and small trees
The Mn DNR recommends that garlic mustard is pulled or cut at ground level
in areas where there is light infestation. Glyphosate may be applied in early
spring or late fall when native plants are dormant.
Reed canary grass may be treated in large swaths with aquatic glyphosate.
Use of wick applications may be helpful to control reed canary grass, which
encouraging other species to become established.
Every invasive species management plan should include a phasing plan to
ensure that initial and follow up treatments are planned.
LAKE ANN PARK PRESERVE FEASIBILITY STUDY 3-7
OTHER AMENITIES
INTERPRETIVE SIGNAGE
Interpretive signage should be incorporated into the park preserve along the
trails in appropriate locations to help tell the story of the parkland. Themes
should include:
»Site Ecology
»Site History
»City Trail and Park Planning
In locations where natural surface trails intersect with paved trails, foot
cleaning stations should be paired with informational signage about invasive
species to help prevent their spread.
WAYFINDING SIGNAGE
While many people may get to know the trail system in the park preserve, the
new land will draw visitors and wayfinding signage will help them navigate
and better understand where they are and how to get to where they want to
go. Signage should be located at entries to the park preserve and at decision
points where trails split.
Left: An example of educational signage
Center: An example of a boot brush foot cleaning station and informational signage
Right: An example of wayfinding signage
Left: An example of a fishing pier
Right: An example of a bird blind dock
WATER ACCESS
While the best location is to be determined, there is an opportunity to
connect park users with the lakes. This could occur with a fishing pier or
a bird blind. When locating this feature, it is important to consider both the
views it provides to users and also the views the dock will become a part of
(what does it look like from across the lake?).
CONCEPT PLAN 3-8 NOVEMBER 2019
ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL
1 NEW BITUMINOUS TRAIL - PARK INTERIOR LF 6,250 $152 $950,000
2
RECONSTRUCT EXISTING BITUMINOUS TRAIL
- NW CORNER OF LAKE LUCY ADJACENT TO
RESIDENTIAL HOMES
LF 1,250 $132 $165,000
3
RECONSTRUCT EXISTING BITUMINOUS TRAIL
- EAST SIDE OF LAKE ANN - CONSTRUCTION
ACCESS CORRIDOR
LF 2,675 $100 $267,500
4 TIMBER BOARDWALK STRUCTURE LF 800 $1,000 $800,000
5 PREFABRICATED PEDESTRIAN TRUSS BRIDGE EA 1 $175,000 $175,000
6 NATURAL TRAIL ENHANCEMENTS ALLOWANCE LS 1 $100,000 $100,000
7 GREENWOOD SHORES PARKING LOT
IMPROVEMENTS
SQ YD 200 $125 $25,000
8 TEMPORARY ACCESS AND HAUL ROAD
MAINTENANCE
LS 1 $50,000 $50,000
9 EDUCATIONAL/INTERPRETIVE SIGNAGE
ALLOWANCE
LS 1 $50,000 $50,000
10 INFORMATIONAL KIOSKS EA 3 $15,000 $45,000
11 WAYFINDING ALLOWANCE LS 1 $20,000 $20,000
12 INVASIVES TREATMENT/REMOVAL ACRE 30 $2,500 $75,000
13 FISHING PIER/BIRD BLIND EA 1 $75,000 $75,000
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $2,797,500.00
CONTINGENCY (20%) $559,500.00
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST TOTAL $3,357,000.00
ESTIMATED OVERHEAD COSTS (ADMIN, DESIGN,
ENGINEERING LEGAL) (25%)
$839,250.00
ESTIMATED OVERALL PROJECT COST $4,196,250.00
IMPLEMENTATION
COST ESTIMATE
The following cost estimate has been prepared to provide guidance on
the costs associated with build-out of the concept plan. This estimate was
prepared in November of 2019 and reflects current conditions.
Prices are subject to change based on any number of factors including,
but not limited to changing labor and material costs, the bidding schedule
and environment, phasing considerations, inflation, changes to the design,
donations/volunteers, and other unknown circumstances.
4 IMPLEMENTATION
LAKE ANN PARK PRESERVE FEASIBILITY STUDY 4-1
Notes:
1 - Includes construction costs associated with interior park paved trail construction including mobilization, 2-foot muck
excavation, select granular borrow, geotextile fabric, draintile, geogrid, 4-inch coarse aggregate, 6-inch Class 5
aggregate base, 3-inch trail pavement, culverts, erosion control, topsoil, seed and signage.
2 - Includes construction costs associated with new paved trail construction including mobilization, earthwork (minimal
grade changes), 6-inch Class 5 aggregate base, 3-inch trail pavement, culverts, erosion control, topsoil, seed and
signage.
3 - Includes construction costs associated with replacing existing paved trail with new 10 foot trail due to construction
hauling damage. Includes 6-inch Class 5 aggregate base, 3-inch trail pavement, erosion control, topsoil and seed.
4 - Assumes helical anchor supported H-10 design (bridge) capable of carrying vehicles, 12’ clear width with 4’-6” railings.
Actual depth and size of helical anchors is unknown until sub-surface soil borings can be completed. Pricing could be
greatly affected up or down depending on results. Assumes 400’ needed near Lennar site. Assumes 400’ at Bridge #2
location
5 - Assumes prefabricated truss bridge with precast concrete abutments. Assumes bridge spans do not exceed 35 feet in
length. Includes costs for creating look-outs on each side of the bridge.
6 - Includes construction costs associated with narrow planked boardwalks, culverts, and waterbars to manage water and
user impacts on natural surface trails
7 - Includes construction costs associated with grading, adding paved parking, curb stops, bollards. Relocate existing gate.
8 - Assumes temporary bridge is required at Bridge #1 location to facilitate boardwalk and paved trail construction. Includes
costs to place wood chips or other materials to maintain haul routes into the site.
9 - Assumes costs associated with the manufacture and installation of educational signage related to the history, planning,
and ecological functioning of the site.
10 - Includes costs for informational kiosks located at parking lots
11 - Assumes costs associated with the manufacture and installation of wayfinding signage at trail intersections and parking
lots.
12 - Includes costs related to Buckthorn removal and stump treatment, spraying (Buckthorn, Garlic Mustard, other
invasives), forest mowing.
13 - Assumes construction of DNR Fishing Pier or Bird Blind
IMPLEMENTATIONNOVEMBER 2019 4-2
PERMITTING
Based on site visits and review of available resources and rules, the
proposed alignment can be constructed with minimal regulatory review.
Permits will be needed from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the
MNDNR for the two areas were wetland/water will be crossed, but these
are reasonable provided the design achieves the goal of a complete span.
Outside of City requirements, the primary permitting agency is the Riley
Purgatory Creek Watershed District, which will regulate the majority of the
project features. There will be components of the project that will need to be
designed in compliance with their rules, however these all seem achievable.
Pre-design consultation with the watershed district is recommended to
discuss the project, timing, and ensure that they can proceed with permitting
the project as design is finalized. The watershed district is aware of the
project and has expressed an interest in partnering to ensure it is a good
example of best practices.
Overall, this project fits well into the regulatory framework. Certainly some
components will require compliance with the rules, but I see no fatal flaws
that would prevent the concept plans that have been prepared from being
used as a basis for more formal processing and finalization. The main things
needed are to:
1. Remain outside of wetlands
2. Maintain the minimum buffer setbacks
3. Ensure the design of the wetland crossings (the one into Lake Lucy and
the channel between Lake Lucy and Lake Ann) are complete spans, do
not contribute to floodplain capacity, and meet your trail design standards.
4. Have early and often regulatory correspondence.
Based on the proposed trail alignments, the route will be able to avoid any
impacts to delineated wetlands. Two channel crossings will be needed, but
we assume that they will be constructed to span the channels, and have no
discharge within the wetland boundaries.
Permitting
»It is recommended that the plans be shared with the Riley Purgatory
Bluff Watershed District, and request a No-Loss determination under the
Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act.
»The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers also regulates wetlands in the project
area, and will need to permit the two crossings.
»The channel from Lake Lucy to Lake Ann would also be considered Public
Water and would be regulated by the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources.
»Provided the crossings of the channel and the wetland flowing into
Lake Lucy completely span the wetland, there would be no mitigation
requirements, however the MNDNR typically likes to see the crossing
design include a hydraulics and hydrology report to ensure the crossing
will have no effects on the lakes or channel.
LAKE ANN PARK PRESERVE FEASIBILITY STUDY 4-3
»Floodplain impacts may occur if there is discharge within the floodplain.
This discharge may reduce the floodplain capacity, which is why it is
regulated, however it can also be mitigated if an equal volume of storage
can be created. Impacts would be determined with design, and mitigation
would be included within the grading plan. This is also regulated by the
Riley Creek Watershed District.
»The watershed also regulated grading and erosion control, the water
crossing, and wetland buffers. Trails are allowed within the wetland
buffers, provided the minimum buffer width is maintained. I am assuming
that Lake Ann is considered an Exceptional wetland, and therefore
you would need to keep the trail a minimum of 40-feet away from the
delineated wetland edge around the lake. This appears to be possible,
although some additional grading to maintain the desired slops may be
needed to achieve.
»Crossing the interceptor will require review and approval from the
Metropolitan Council for encroachments.
PROJECT PHASING
There are a number of actions that still must be done to accomplish the full
build out of the park preserve. It is preferrable for construction of the wetland
boardwalk to occur in coordination with the construction of the developer’s
portion of the trails at the south end of the new neighborhood to minimize
impacts on new residents.
ACTION NOTES
Secure Funding
Design and Engineering
Soil Borings Wetland borings should be done in the early winter
Permitting Can be done at 90% Plan Completion of design/engineering
Bidding Preferred bidding environment in the fall for construction the next year
Construction
Set Boardwalk Structural Supports Should be done in Winter
Construct Boardwalk Top Should be done Spring/Summer/Fall
Construct Trail Should be done Spring/Summer/Fall
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS AND STAGING
The selected contractor will have their own approach to access and staging,
but it must be consistent with the City’s goals. The construction of the
wetland boardwalk is anticipated to come from the west in coordination with
the development of the new neighborhood. In order to minimize the impacts
to the Greenwood Shores neighborhood, the main construction access for
the paved trails is anticipated to come from Lake Ann Park and follow the
trail along the east side of the lake. There will still be some disruption to the
Greenwood Shores neighborhood and the Lucy Ridge neighborhood as
trails, bridge, boardwalks, and parking lot are constructed.
This estimate assumes a haul road will be necessary for certain parts of the
project, especially for a temporary crossing of the Lake Ann/Lake Lucy creek.
It is of the utmost importance that all areas impacted by construction are
restored to a natural condition.
IMPLEMENTATIONNOVEMBER 2019 4-4
FUNDING SOURCES
A number of funding sources may be available for the development of the
Lake Ann Park Preserve. Possible opportunities have been identified from
the City’s Park System Plan:
GENERAL FUNDS
General funds can and should be used to develop and maintain the parks
and recreation system. General funds are the primary funding source for on-
going maintenance, operations, and amenities.
DEDICATED TAX LEVY
A city can hold a referendum for a dedicated tax levy with proceeds directed
specifically for parks and recreation. This levy can be used for capital
projects as well as operations and maintenance. The proceeds may be in
place of general funds or be supplemented by general funds.
BONDING
General Obligation Bonds and Revenue Bonds provide another source of
implementation funding for new public facilities, as well as repairs and/or
upgrades to existing facilities.
GENERAL PARK BOND ISSUE
Residents can decide to raise revenue through a permanent or temporary
tax increase dedicated for specific purposes such as park, trail, and bikeway
improvements and maintenance. These funds are usually provided through
bonds approved as part of a voter referendum.
PARK AND TRAIL DEDICATION
Minnesota Statutes allow local governments to require dedication of land or
cash in-lieu of land for parks and trails from new subdivisions. The dedication
must be reasonable and rationally related to the recreation demand created
by the development.
The land for the park preserve was secured in part through park dedication.
Fees collected are deposited into the City’s park and recreation development
fund or its multipurpose trail fund and are used for the development of new
or expanded facilities. Park dedication may not be used for maintenance or
replacement of existing facilities.
UTILITY/FRANCHISE FEES
Franchise fees are included on the monthly bill that customers receive
from a utility, such as natural gas, electricity or cable. The fee can be a flat
amount each month or a percentage of the monthly bill. A franchise fee can
be implemented with an ordinance, which must be approved by the City
Council.
PARTNERSHIPS
Public and private partnerships have been key to the development of
the parks and recreation system. These relationships have led to the
development of different types of parks, including natural resource
management. The Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District may
be a viable partner on this project to be an example of best management
practices for wetlands and lakes
LAKE ANN PARK PRESERVE FEASIBILITY STUDY 4-5
DONATIONS
Private donations are another potential funding source. These may be
financial donations from individuals or area corporations, or donations of
labor from recreation clubs or use agreements.
GRANTS
The City has been successful at securing grant funding and should continue
to pursue opportunities when potential award outweigh the costs for applying
or administrating.
MINNESOTA DNR
The Minnesota DNR is one of the most comprehensive resources when
it comes to state funding for park and trail programs. They offer a variety
of grant programs and technical assistance. Current programs provide
assistance for many features including recreational trails. Some programs
also offer assistance for the development of parks or for trail amenities such
as restrooms, lightning, benches, etc.
Each of the Minnesota DNR grant programs is unique. The DNR should
be consulted before pursuing a grant to clarify funding availability and
qualifications.
CLEAN WATER, LAND AND LEGACY AMENDMENT
On Nov. 4 2008, Minnesota voters approved the Clean Water, Land and
Legacy Amendment to the Minnesota State Constitution which increased
the general sales and use tax rate by three-eighths of one percentage point
(0.375%) to 6.875% and dedicated the additional proceeds for the Arts and
Cultural Heritage Fund, the Outdoor Heritage Fund, Clean Water Fund, and
Parks and Trails Fund.
Funding from the Legacy Amendment is administered by a variety of
agencies such as the Department of Natural Resources, Pollution Control
Agency, Department of Health, Historical Society, Minnesota State Arts
Board and regional art councils. A number of new grant programs were
created. Information about grant opportunities can be found on individual
state department and organization websites.
FOUNDATIONS & NON-PROFITS
There are foundations and non-profits that are interested in fulfilling their
missions by supporting local projects. There are a number of on-line tools
that can assist with the process of identifying additional foundations that may
provide financial support for park, trail, and bikeway improvements.
IMPLEMENTATIONNOVEMBER 2019 4-6
SEPTEMBER 2017
City of Chanhassen
Parks & recreation system Plan
SEPTEMBER 2017
Acknowledgements
city council
Denny Laufenburger, Mayor
Dan Campion
Jerry McDonald
Elise Ryan
Bethany Tjornhom
Park commission
Steve Scharfenberg, Chair
Jennifer Hougham, Vice Chair
Cole Kelly
Jim Boettcher
Rick Echternacht
Meredith Petouvis
Karl Tsuchiya
Lauren Dale, Youth Commissioner
Grant Schaeferle, Youth Commissioner
city staff
Todd Gerhardt, City Manager
Todd Hoffman, Park & Recreation Director
Jerry Ruegemer, Recreation Superintendent
Katie Favro, Recreation Supervisor
Adam Beers, Park Superintendent
Jodi Sarles, Recreation Center Manager
Susan Bill, Senior Center Coordinator
advisory committee
Cheryl Ayotte
Jim Boettcher
Balakrishna Chintaginjala
Karen Doster
Jeff Filipek
Jesse Hawke
Kim Mcreavy
Nick Mcreavy
Courtney Miller Bellairs
Todd Neils
Nathan Pharis
Elise Ryan
Anna Simet
Steve Scharfenberg
John Tietz
Dorina Tipton
consultant
Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc.
Thank you to the many members of the Chanhassen community
who took the time to provide valuable input on this plan!
i ContentsSEPTEMBER 2017
Contents
Executive Summary iii
Introduction 1-1
Importance of Parks & Recreation 1-2
How to Use the Plan 1-3
Planning Process 1-4
Existing Plans 1-5
Coordinated Planning Efforts 1-5
Trends 2-7
Existing Conditions 3-13
Community Context 3-14
Demographic Overview 3-14
System at a Glance 3-16
Needs Assessment 3-20
Vision 4-37
Guiding Principles 4-38
System Plan 5-39
Goals & Policies 5-40
Initiatives 5-49
Implementation 6-63
Priorities 6-64
Maintenance and Replacement 6-70
Funding Options 6-71
Funding Sources 6-72
General Capital, Operations, & Maintenance Costs 6-76
Project Review Process 6-78
Distribution Maps A-1
Community Engagement B-1
Phase 1 Community Engagement - Fall 2016 B-3
Phase 2 Community Engagement - Spring 2017 B-7
ii Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
Tables & Figures
Figure 3-1. Community Context 3-14
Figure 3-2. Historic Population and
Metropolitan Council Population
Forecasts 3-15
Figure 3-3. Age & Gender Distribution 3-15
Figure 3-4. Median Household Income 3-15
Figure 3-5. City Park Distribution 3-17
Figure 3-6. Key Findings From the Fall
System-Wide Questionnaire 3-21
Figure 3-7. Key Findings From the Fall
Senior Center Questionnaire 3-22
Figure 3-8. Key Findings From the Fall
Recreation Center Questionnaire 3-23
Figure 3-9. Key Findings From the Fall
Social PinPoint 3-24
Figure 3-10. Neighborhood Park Access 3-26
Figure 3-11. Community Park Access 3-27
Figure 3-12. Playground & Picnic Shelter
Distribution 3-28
Figure 3-13. Traditional Athletic Fields
Distribution 3-29
Figure 3-14. Informal Summer Facilities
Distribution 3-30
Figure 3-15. Surrounding Community Facility
Distribution 3-31
Figure 3-16. Preserves, Open Space, & Trails 3-33
Figure 3-17. City Trail Gaps and Identified
Safety Crossing Concerns 3-34
Table 5-1. City Park Classifications 5-41
Figure 5-1. Regional Search Corridors 5-42
Figure 5-2. Park Initiatives 5-51
Figure 5-3. Facility Initiatives 5-56
Figure 5-4. Trail Initiatives 5-59
Figure 5-5. Preserve Initiatives 5-60
Table 6-1. Total Initiative Costs 6-64
Table 6-2. Prioritized Capital Investment
Initiatives 6-65
Table 6-3. Prioritized Plan/Study Initiatives 6-66
Table 6-4. Prioritized Management Initiatives 6-66
Table 6-5. Ongoing Initiatives 6-67
Table 6-6. Trail Gap Priorities 6-68
Table 6-7. Maintenance and Replacement
Costs 2017-2040 6-70
Table 6-8. Funding Sources 6-72
Table 6-9. General Capital, Operations, &
Maintenance Costs 6-76
Figure 6-1. Decision Principle Checklist 6-79
Figure 6-2. Project Proposal Worksheet 6-80
Figure A-1. Playground & Picnic Shelter
Distribution A-2
Figure A-2. Traditional Athletic Fields
Distribution A-3
Figure A-3. Informal Summer Facilities
Distribution A-4
Figure A-4. Informal Winter Facilities
Distribution A-5
Figure A-5. Speciality Facilities Distribution A-6
Figure A-6. Surrounding Community Facility
Distribution A-7
iii ContentsSEPTEMBER 2017
Executive Summary
What it is?
the 2017 chanhassen Parks and recreation
system Plan sets the direction for parks and
recreation in chanhassen for the next 20
years.
the system Plan ensures the parks and
recreation system continues to meet
community needs now and in the future.
the system Plan weighs community needs
and desires with financial realities to ensure
the system is economically sustainable and
responsible with tax dollars.
the system Plan determines priorities for future
investment and contains 6 goals, 52 policies,
and 54 initiatives
Guided By:
the development of the system Plan was guided by
the city’s vision for the future as well as the following
principles:
Stewardship marked as the highest priority to
chanhassen residents, stewardship aims to incorporate
sustainable practices into the system’s planning and
daily operations to protect the city’s vibrant natural
resources.
Connectivity chanhassen’s parks, preserves,
and trails are knitted together to create a network of
recreation and open spaces that reaches every corner
of the community and provides access to surrounding
destinations as well.
Engagement residents of all ages and all
abilities are welcome throughout chanhassen’s
parks and recreation system, enabling them to lead
active, healthy lives in which they engage with
the outdoors, with art and culture, and with one
another.
Adaptable as chanhassen has evolved, its
parks and recreation system has remained
adaptable in the way it responds to new needs
and challenges, and dynamic in its ability to
deliver high-quality programs, facilities, and
services.
1
2
3
4
Over its 50 years, Chanhassen’s Parks and Recreation
System has improved the community’s quality of life,
economic development, and environmental resources.
With over 900 acres of parks and open space, 30
parks, and almost 80 miles of trails, the Chanhassen
Parks and Recreation System is an essential component
of the City.
Planning Process
This year-long planning effort began in August of 2016, and
represents input gathered from the community, stakeholders,
city staff, and city officials. Online questionnaires, meetings,
focus groups, park and community tours, open houses, and
group brainstorming efforts guided the development of the
System Plan by providing valuable input and collective
wisdom. The plan also incorporates the expertise of the
consultant team, analysis of benchmarking data, a system-
wide audit conducted by city staff and the consultants, and
best practices collected from other peer communities.
The goal of the planning process was to educate and raise
awareness about the importance of parks and recreation
while ensuring that future investment in Chanhassen’s
system meets the needs of the community.
Benefits of a Parks & recreation
system Plan
- Road map for system revitalization and expansion
- Defensible rationale for decision-making
- Strategic resource allocation (budgeting and staffing)
- Fosters strong partnerships
- Creates safe and welcoming parks
- An updated recreation facility mix
- A more connected City
- Improved access to nature
- Selective programming to meet gaps and needs
- Long-term economic sustainability
iv Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
CHANHASSEN PARKS & RECREATION SYSTEM PLANOnline Community Engagement SummaryFour different online engagement strategies were implementedin order to reach as many demographics as possible. Three online questionnaires captured public comments regarding the senior center, the recreation center, and the parks and recreation system in general. The fourth online strategy involved an interactive mapping software intended to collect geographic-based comments.
This summary includes a synopsis of some of the significant findings from all four
engagement techniques. 1 % never 34% every day 48% once a week 10% once a monthHow OftenRespondentsUtilize Chan Parks & Rec 8% few times a year 80%
52%
35%
75% 74%
72%
47%
29%
26%
66%
52%
21%
11%
6%
Respondents’
Favorite Facilities
By Percent
Respondents’
Favorite Programs
By Percent
neighborhood parks
trails
community parks
beaches
recreation center
preserves/natural areas
diamondelds
rectangularelds
ice skatingrinks
18% tenniscourts
6% pickleballcourts
communityevents
youthactivities
familyactivities
adulttness
adultpickleball
2
1
3
4
edenprairie
victoria
excelsior
chaska
Top 4 Destinations
For Non-Chan Parks &
Recreation Facilities
Top 3 Desired Facilities
natural play areas
75%
outdoor pool
60%
indoor pool
72%
Under 50% Needs Met Over 50% Needs Met Not Utilized
preserve/natural areas
youth sports and classes
trails
adult sports and classes
recreation center
0%20%40%60%80%100%
46%
21%17%
15%78%
44%14%
13%71%
31%23%
62%
42%
7%
16%
Top 5 Unmet Facility & Programming Needs
“While private rec facilities
should ll the gaps in
programming, something like an
outdoor swimming pool should be
seriously considered as a city run
facility. Lifetime is the only option
in the city and is not affordable for
all.”
“We are lacking in facilities to
support our population here. A
larger sports complex is needed.”
“Keep up the great work
and enhance our parks;
one of the main reasons
we live here.”
“Improving our existing rec
center would add value and
encourage pride in our
community. It should be a top
priority.”
Select General Comments
community engagement
The goal of the planning process was to educate and raise awareness about
the importance of parks and recreation while ensuring that future investment
in Chanhassen’s system meets the needs of the community. Throughout this
planning process, over 1,000 residents and stakeholders were engaged to
ensure the final plan was reflective of community desires.
Public outreach efforts included:
»Six Advisory Committee meetings spread throughout the year-long planning
process
»Two listening sessions (Athletic Associations and Senior Center Commission)
»Three online questionnaires and two online interactive mapping exercises
which reached almost 2,000 individuals and solicited 1,500 responses
»Seven Pop-up meetings at community events
»A Community Open House held on April 6th of 2017, where over 70
community members provided feedback on the System Plan’s draft
recommendations
CHANHASSEN PARKS & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN
Online Community Engagement Summary
Four different online engagement strategies were implemented
in order to reach as many demographics as possible. Three online questionnaires
captured public comments regarding the senior center, the recreation center, and the
parks and recreation system in general. The fourth online strategy involved an
interactive mapping software intended to collect geographic-based comments.
This summary includes a synopsis of some of the significant findings from all four
engagement techniques. 1 % never 34%
e
v
e
r
y
d
ay
48% once a week 10% once a monthHow Often
Respondents
Utilize
Chan Parks
& Rec
8% few times a year 80%
52%
35%
75% 74%
72%
47%
29%
26%
66%
52%
21%
11%
6%
Respondents’
Favorite Facilities
By Percent
Respondents’
Favorite Programs
By Percent
neighborhood parks
trails
community parks
beaches
recreation center
preserves/natural areas
diamondelds
rectangularelds
ice skatingrinks
18% tenniscourts
6% pickleballcourts
communityevents
youthactivities
familyactivities
adulttness
adultpickleball
2
1
3
4
edenprairie
victoria
excelsior
chaska
Top 4 Destinations
For Non-Chan Parks &
Recreation Facilities
Top 3 Desired Facilities
natural play areas
75%
outdoor pool
60%
indoor pool
72%
Under 50% Needs Met Over 50% Needs Met Not Utilized
preserve/natural areas
youth sports and classes
trails
adult sports and classes
recreation center
0%20%40%60%80%100%
46%
21%17%
15%78%
44%14%
13%71%
31%23%
62%
42%
7%
16%
Top 5 Unmet Facility & Programming Needs
“While private rec facilities
should ll the gaps in
programming, something like an
outdoor swimming pool should be
seriously considered as a city run
facility. Lifetime is the only option
in the city and is not affordable for
all.”
“We are lacking in facilities to
support our population here. A
larger sports complex is needed.”
“Keep up the great work
and enhance our parks;
one of the main reasons
we live here.”
“Improving our existing rec
center would add value and
encourage pride in our
community. It should be a top
priority.”
Select General Comments
CHANHASSEN PARKS & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN
Online Community Engagement Summary
Four different online engagement strategies were implemented
in order to reach as many demographics as possible. Three online questionnaires
captured public comments regarding the senior center, the recreation center, and the
parks and recreation system in general. The fourth online strategy involved an
interactive mapping software intended to collect geographic-based comments.
This summary includes a synopsis of some of the significant findings from all four
engagement techniques. 1 % never 34%
e
v
e
r
y
day 48% once a week 10% once a monthHow Often
Respondents
Utilize
Chan Parks
& Rec
8% few times a year 80%
52%
35%
75% 74%
72%
47%
29%
26%
66%
52%
21%
11%
6%
Respondents’
Favorite Facilities
By Percent
Respondents’
Favorite Programs
By Percent
neighborhood parks
trails
community parks
beaches
recreation center
preserves/natural areas
diamondelds
rectangularelds
ice skatingrinks
18% tenniscourts
6% pickleballcourts
communityevents
youthactivities
familyactivities
adulttness
adultpickleball
2
1
3
4
edenprairie
victoria
excelsior
chaska
Top 4 Destinations
For Non-Chan Parks &
Recreation Facilities
Top 3 Desired Facilities
natural play areas
75%
outdoor pool
60%
indoor pool
72%
Under 50% Needs Met Over 50% Needs Met Not Utilized
preserve/natural areas
youth sports and classes
trails
adult sports and classes
recreation center
0%20%40%60%80%100%
46%
21%17%
15%78%
44%14%
13%71%
31%23%
62%
42%
7%
16%
Top 5 Unmet Facility & Programming Needs
“While private rec facilities
should ll the gaps in
programming, something like an
outdoor swimming pool should be
seriously considered as a city run
facility. Lifetime is the only option
in the city and is not affordable for
all.”
“We are lacking in facilities to
support our population here. A
larger sports complex is needed.”
“Keep up the great work
and enhance our parks;
one of the main reasons
we live here.”
“Improving our existing rec
center would add value and
encourage pride in our
community. It should be a top
priority.”
Select General Comments
CHANHASSEN PARKS & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN
Online Community Engagement Summary
Four different online engagement strategies were implemented
in order to reach as many demographics as possible. Three online questionnaires
captured public comments regarding the senior center, the recreation center, and the
parks and recreation system in general. The fourth online strategy involved an
interactive mapping software intended to collect geographic-based comments.
This summary includes a synopsis of some of the significant findings from all four
engagement techniques. 1 % never 34%
e
v
e
r
y
d
ay
48% once a week 10% once a monthHow OftenRespondents
Utilize Chan Parks
& Rec
8% few times a year 80%
52%
35%
75% 74%
72%
47%
29%
26%
66%
52%
21%
11%
6%
Respondents’
Favorite Facilities
By Percent
Respondents’
Favorite Programs
By Percent
neighborhood parks
trails
community parks
beaches
recreation center
preserves/natural areas
diamondelds
rectangularelds
ice skatingrinks
18% tenniscourts
6% pickleballcourts
communityevents
youthactivities
familyactivities
adulttness
adultpickleball
2
1
3
4
edenprairie
victoria
excelsior
chaska
Top 4 Destinations
For Non-Chan Parks &
Recreation Facilities
Top 3 Desired Facilities
natural play areas
75%
outdoor pool
60%
indoor pool
72%
Under 50% Needs Met Over 50% Needs Met Not Utilized
preserve/natural areas
youth sports and classes
trails
adult sports and classes
recreation center
0%20%40%60%80%100%
46%
21%17%
15%78%
44%14%
13%71%
31%23%
62%
42%
7%
16%
Top 5 Unmet Facility & Programming Needs
“While private rec facilities
should ll the gaps in
programming, something like an
outdoor swimming pool should be
seriously considered as a city run
facility. Lifetime is the only option
in the city and is not affordable for
all.”
“We are lacking in facilities to
support our population here. A
larger sports complex is needed.”
“Keep up the great work
and enhance our parks;
one of the main reasons
we live here.”
“Improving our existing rec
center would add value and
encourage pride in our
community. It should be a top
priority.”
Select General Comments
CHANHASSEN PARKS & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN
Online Community Engagement Summary
Four different online engagement strategies were implemented
in order to reach as many demographics as possible. Three online questionnaires
captured public comments regarding the senior center, the recreation center, and the
parks and recreation system in general. The fourth online strategy involved an
interactive mapping software intended to collect geographic-based comments.
This summary includes a synopsis of some of the significant findings from all four
engagement techniques. 1 % never 34%
e
v
e
r
y
d
ay
48% once a week 10% once a monthHow Often
Respondents
Utilize
Chan Parks
& Rec
8% few times a year 80%
52%
35%
75% 74%
72%
47%
29%
26%
66%
52%
21%
11%
6%
Respondents’
Favorite Facilities
By Percent
Respondents’
Favorite Programs
By Percent
neighborhood parks
trails
community parks
beaches
recreation center
preserves/natural areas
diamondelds
rectangularelds
ice skatingrinks
18% tenniscourts
6% pickleballcourts
communityevents
youthactivities
familyactivities
adulttness
adultpickleball
2
1
3
4
edenprairie
victoria
excelsior
chaska
Top 4 Destinations
For Non-Chan Parks &
Recreation Facilities
Top 3 Desired Facilities
natural play areas
75%
outdoor pool
60%
indoor pool
72%
Under 50% Needs Met Over 50% Needs Met Not Utilized
preserve/natural areas
youth sports and classes
trails
adult sports and classes
recreation center
0%20%40%60%80%100%
46%
21%17%
15%78%
44%14%
13%71%
31%23%
62%
42%
7%
16%
Top 5 Unmet Facility & Programming Needs
“While private rec facilities
should ll the gaps in
programming, something like an
outdoor swimming pool should be
seriously considered as a city run
facility. Lifetime is the only option
in the city and is not affordable for
all.”
“We are lacking in facilities to
support our population here. A
larger sports complex is needed.”
“Keep up the great work
and enhance our parks;
one of the main reasons
we live here.”
“Improving our existing rec
center would add value and
encourage pride in our
community. It should be a top
priority.”
Select General Comments
CHANHASSEN PARKS & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN
Online Community Engagement Summary
Four different online engagement strategies were implemented
in order to reach as many demographics as possible. Three online questionnaires
captured public comments regarding the senior center, the recreation center, and the
parks and recreation system in general. The fourth online strategy involved an
interactive mapping software intended to collect geographic-based comments.
This summary includes a synopsis of some of the significant findings from all four
engagement techniques. 1 % never 34%
e
v
e
r
y
d
ay 48% once a week 10% once a monthHow Often
Respondents
Utilize
Chan Parks
& Rec
8% few times a year 80%
52%
35%
75% 74%
72%
47%
29%
26%
66%
52%
21%
11%
6%
Respondents’
Favorite Facilities
By Percent
Respondents’
Favorite Programs
By Percent
neighborhood parks
trails
community parks
beaches
recreation center
preserves/natural areas
diamondelds
rectangularelds
ice skatingrinks
18% tenniscourts
6% pickleballcourts
communityevents
youthactivities
familyactivities
adulttness
adultpickleball
2
1
3
4
edenprairie
victoria
excelsior
chaska
Top 4 Destinations
For Non-Chan Parks &
Recreation Facilities
Top 3 Desired Facilities
natural play areas
75%
outdoor pool
60%
indoor pool
72%
Under 50% Needs Met Over 50% Needs Met Not Utilized
preserve/natural areas
youth sports and classes
trails
adult sports and classes
recreation center
0%20%40%60%80%100%
46%
21%17%
15%78%
44%14%
13%71%
31%23%
62%
42%
7%
16%
Top 5 Unmet Facility & Programming Needs
“While private rec facilities
should ll the gaps in
programming, something like an
outdoor swimming pool should be
seriously considered as a city run
facility. Lifetime is the only option
in the city and is not affordable for
all.”
“We are lacking in facilities to
support our population here. A
larger sports complex is needed.”
“Keep up the great work
and enhance our parks;
one of the main reasons
we live here.”
“Improving our existing rec
center would add value and
encourage pride in our
community. It should be a top
priority.”
Select General Comments
CHANHASSEN PARKS & RECREATION SYSTEM PLANOnline Community Engagement SummaryFour different online engagement strategies were implementedin order to reach as many demographics as possible. Three online questionnaires captured public comments regarding the senior center, the recreation center, and the
parks and recreation system in general. The fourth online strategy involved an
interactive mapping software intended to collect geographic-based comments.
This summary includes a synopsis of some of the significant findings from all four
engagement techniques. 1 % never 34% every day 48% once a week 10% once a monthHow OftenRespondentsUtilize
Chan Parks
& Rec
8% few times a year 80%
52%
35%
75% 74%
72%
47%
29%
26%
66%
52%
21%
11%
6%
Respondents’
Favorite Facilities
By Percent
Respondents’
Favorite Programs
By Percent
neighborhood parks
trails
community parks
beaches
recreation center
preserves/natural areas
diamondelds
rectangularelds
ice skatingrinks
18% tenniscourts
6% pickleballcourts
communityevents
youthactivities
familyactivities
adulttness
adultpickleball
2
1
3
4
edenprairie
victoria
excelsior
chaska
Top 4 Destinations
For Non-Chan Parks &
Recreation Facilities
Top 3 Desired Facilities
natural play areas
75%
outdoor pool
60%
indoor pool
72%
Under 50% Needs Met Over 50% Needs Met Not Utilized
preserve/natural areas
youth sports and classes
trails
adult sports and classes
recreation center
0%20%40%60%80%100%
46%
21%17%
15%78%
44%14%
13%71%
31%23%
62%
42%
7%
16%
Top 5 Unmet Facility & Programming Needs
“While private rec facilities
should ll the gaps in
programming, something like an
outdoor swimming pool should be
seriously considered as a city run
facility. Lifetime is the only option
in the city and is not affordable for
all.”
“We are lacking in facilities to
support our population here. A
larger sports complex is needed.”
“Keep up the great work
and enhance our parks;
one of the main reasons
we live here.”
“Improving our existing rec
center would add value and
encourage pride in our
community. It should be a top
priority.”
Select General Comments
CHANHASSEN PARKS & RECREATION SYSTEM PLANOnline Community Engagement SummaryFour different online engagement strategies were implemented
in order to reach as many demographics as possible. Three online questionnaires
captured public comments regarding the senior center, the recreation center, and the
parks and recreation system in general. The fourth online strategy involved an
interactive mapping software intended to collect geographic-based comments.
This summary includes a synopsis of some of the significant findings from all four
engagement techniques. 1 % never 34% every d
ay 48% once a week 10% once a monthHow Often
Respondents
Utilize
Chan Parks
& Rec
8% few times a year 80%
52%
35%
75% 74%
72%
47%
29%
26%
66%
52%
21%
11%
6%
Respondents’
Favorite Facilities
By Percent
Respondents’
Favorite Programs
By Percent
neighborhood parks
trails
community parks
beaches
recreation center
preserves/natural areas
diamondelds
rectangularelds
ice skatingrinks
18% tenniscourts
6% pickleballcourts
communityevents
youthactivities
familyactivities
adulttness
adultpickleball
2
1
3
4
edenprairie
victoria
excelsior
chaska
Top 4 Destinations
For Non-Chan Parks &
Recreation Facilities
Top 3 Desired Facilities
natural play areas
75%
outdoor pool
60%
indoor pool
72%
Under 50% Needs Met Over 50% Needs Met Not Utilized
preserve/natural areas
youth sports and classes
trails
adult sports and classes
recreation center
0%20%40%60%80%100%
46%
21%17%
15%78%
44%14%
13%71%
31%23%
62%
42%
7%
16%
Top 5 Unmet Facility & Programming Needs
“While private rec facilities
should ll the gaps in
programming, something like an
outdoor swimming pool should be
seriously considered as a city run
facility. Lifetime is the only option
in the city and is not affordable for
all.”
“We are lacking in facilities to
support our population here. A
larger sports complex is needed.”
“Keep up the great work
and enhance our parks;
one of the main reasons
we live here.”
“Improving our existing rec
center would add value and
encourage pride in our
community. It should be a top
priority.”
Select General Comments
CHANHASSEN PARKS & RECREATION SYSTEM PLANOnline Community Engagement SummaryFour different online engagement strategies were implemented
in order to reach as many demographics as possible. Three online questionnaires
captured public comments regarding the senior center, the recreation center, and the
parks and recreation system in general. The fourth online strategy involved an
interactive mapping software intended to collect geographic-based comments.
This summary includes a synopsis of some of the significant findings from all four
engagement techniques. 1 % never 34% every d
ay 48% once a week 10% once a monthHow Often
Respondents
Utilize
Chan Parks
& Rec
8% few times a year 80%
52%
35%
75% 74%
72%
47%
29%
26%
66%
52%
21%
11%
6%
Respondents’
Favorite Facilities
By Percent
Respondents’
Favorite Programs
By Percent
neighborhood parks
trails
community parks
beaches
recreation center
preserves/natural areas
diamondelds
rectangularelds
ice skatingrinks
18% tenniscourts
6% pickleballcourts
communityevents
youthactivities
familyactivities
adulttness
adultpickleball
2
1
3
4
edenprairie
victoria
excelsior
chaska
Top 4 Destinations
For Non-Chan Parks &
Recreation Facilities
Top 3 Desired Facilities
natural play areas
75%
outdoor pool
60%
indoor pool
72%
Under 50% Needs Met Over 50% Needs Met Not Utilized
preserve/natural areas
youth sports and classes
trails
adult sports and classes
recreation center
0%20%40%60%80%100%
46%
21%17%
15%78%
44%14%
13%71%
31%23%
62%
42%
7%
16%
Top 5 Unmet Facility & Programming Needs
“While private rec facilities
should ll the gaps in
programming, something like an
outdoor swimming pool should be
seriously considered as a city run
facility. Lifetime is the only option
in the city and is not affordable for
all.”
“We are lacking in facilities to
support our population here. A
larger sports complex is needed.”
“Keep up the great work
and enhance our parks;
one of the main reasons
we live here.”
“Improving our existing rec
center would add value and
encourage pride in our
community. It should be a top
priority.”
Select General Comments
CHANHASSEN PARKS & RECREATION SYSTEM PLANOnline Community Engagement SummaryFour different online engagement strategies were implementedin order to reach as many demographics as possible. Three online questionnaires captured public comments regarding the senior center, the recreation center, and the
parks and recreation system in general. The fourth online strategy involved an
interactive mapping software intended to collect geographic-based comments.
This summary includes a synopsis of some of the significant findings from all four
engagement techniques. 1 % never 34% every day 48% once a week 10% once a monthHow OftenRespondentsUtilize
Chan Parks
& Rec
8% few times a year 80%
52%
35%
75% 74%
72%
47%
29%
26%
66%
52%
21%
11%
6%
Respondents’
Favorite Facilities
By Percent
Respondents’
Favorite Programs
By Percent
neighborhood parks
trails
community parks
beaches
recreation center
preserves/natural areas
diamondelds
rectangularelds
ice skatingrinks
18% tenniscourts
6% pickleballcourts
communityevents
youthactivities
familyactivities
adulttness
adultpickleball
2
1
3
4
edenprairie
victoria
excelsior
chaska
Top 4 Destinations
For Non-Chan Parks &
Recreation Facilities
Top 3 Desired Facilities
natural play areas
75%
outdoor pool
60%
indoor pool
72%
Under 50% Needs Met Over 50% Needs Met Not Utilized
preserve/natural areas
youth sports and classes
trails
adult sports and classes
recreation center
0%20%40%60%80%100%
46%
21%17%
15%78%
44%14%
13%71%
31%23%
62%
42%
7%
16%
Top 5 Unmet Facility & Programming Needs
“While private rec facilities
should ll the gaps in
programming, something like an
outdoor swimming pool should be
seriously considered as a city run
facility. Lifetime is the only option
in the city and is not affordable for
all.”
“We are lacking in facilities to
support our population here. A
larger sports complex is needed.”
“Keep up the great work
and enhance our parks;
one of the main reasons
we live here.”
“Improving our existing rec
center would add value and
encourage pride in our
community. It should be a top
priority.”
Select General Comments
trends
In order to meet the demands of a growing population, the City needs to consider the following national population trends:
»Need for convenience
»Increasingly anxious about safety
»More transient
»Pinched government budgets
»Demand for green alternatives
»Desire for conservation and
opportunities to connect with nature
»Increased interest in aging actively
»Engaging new generations
»Increased interest in weight loss
and active living
»Rise in informal adult recreation
versus league participation
»Popularity of new and nontraditional
sports
»Demand for group fitness events
and races
»Desire to create more memorable
experiences
»Increased importance of "place"
v ContentsSEPTEMBER 2017
existing conditions
»over 900 acres of city-owned parks, preserves, and open space
»30 community & neighborhood parks
»14 preserves & 1 special use park
»almost 80 miles of trails
Facilities
27 playground areas
21 picnic shelters
5 swimming beaches
16 tennis courts
10 pickleball courts
28 diamond fields
21 rectangular fields
20 basketball courts
6 sledding hills
4 sand volleyball courts
1 skate park
1 disc golf course
1 garden plot site
7 docks & 3 fishing piers
5 outdoor hockey rinks & 5 pleasure rinks
1 dog park (in partnership)
1 recreation center
Lake Ann Park
Lake Susan
Park
Bandimere
Park
City Center
Park
Chanhassen
Recreation Center
South Lotus
Lake Park
Kerber Pond Park
Power Hill Park
Riley Ridge Park
North Lotus
Lake Park
Meadow
Green Park
Herman Field
Park
Pheasant Hill
Park
Sunset Ridge
Park
Stone Creek
Park
Pioneer
Pass Park
Roundhouse Park
Curry Farms
Park
Chanhassen
Hills Park
Carver Beach
Park
Cathcart Park
(Owned by the
City of Shorewood)
Sugarbush Park
Prairie Knoll
Park
Rice Marsh
Lake Park
Bandimere
Heights Park
Greenwood
Shores Park
Carver Beach
Playground
Minnewashta
Heights Park
Chanhassen
Estates Park
Chanhassen High School
(Joint Facilities)
Manchester Park
(To Be Completed
in 2018)
Minnewashta
Regional P ark
University of Minnes ota
Land scape Arbo retum
Raguet Wild l ife
Ma nagement Area
Privatel y Owned
Public Golf Course
MN Valley National
Wildlife Refuge
Olson Community
Garden
Minnetonka Middle
School West
CenturyBoulevardHazeltineBoulevardBluffCreekDrive
West78th Street
Lyman Boulevard ChanhassenRoadCrosstown Boulevard
Pleasant Vie wRoad
GreatPlain
s
Boulev
a
r
dBa
variaR
o
adSmithtownRoad
Pio n e e rT railW estLo n g a c resDriv eVictoriaDrive
Arboretum Bo ulevard Power
s
Boul
evardKerberBoulevardLake Lucy Road
MinnewashtaParkwayCounty Road 140
LakeDriveEast
He ronDrive
Engler Boulevard
Hund ertm arkRoadEastGalpinBoulevardAudubonRoadPioneer Trail
82nd Street West
F l y i n g C l o u d D r iv e
Chas k a B o u le v ardLakeDrive
Pioneer Trail EastChestnutStreetNorthWest82ndStreet
")140
")53
¬«101
¬«7
£¤212
¬«5
")61
¬«101
¬«101
L
o
t
usL
a
k
eL a k e
S u s a n
LakeRileyR iceL akeLakeMinnewashta
LakeA n n
L a keL ucyR i c e Ma rshLake
E d e n
P r a i r i e
E x c e l s i o r
G r e e n w o o d
M i n n e t o n k aShorewood
T o n k a
B a y
J a c k s o n
T w p .
S h a k o p e e
C h a s k a
V i c t o r i a
LEGEND
Open Space
Community Park
Neighborhood Park
Preserve
Special Use
Non-City Parks & Open Space
Public School
Surrounding Municipal Parks
Water Bodies
Municipal Boundaries °0 0.5 10.25 Miles
Goals & Policies
The System Plan’s goals and policies are high-level statements intended to guide City decision-making over the next
20 years. The six goals represent the desired long-term outcomes of Chanhassen’s System Plan, and were prepared as
depictions of how the Parks and Recreation System will function when the guiding principles are achieved. To guide City
decision-makers, the general characteristics of each goal are described by a series of policies.
1. Provide a comprehensive system
of park, recreation, and open
space facilities to serve active and
passive needs.
2. Maintain a comprehensive
and easily navigable trail and
sidewalk system that connects
neighborhoods to park and
recreation facilities, schools,
community destinations, and other
communities.
3. Ensure all residents have the
opportunity to participate in
recreation, education, cultural,
and arts activities.
4. Be a leader in environmental
sustainability.
5. Proactively plan for a high quality,
efficient parks and recreation
system that meets community
needs.
6. Implement strategies to
supplement the City’s capacity to
maintain and expand the parks
and recreation system.
initiatives
Initiatives are specific actions or steps that are recommended for implementation. They include programs, actions, or
practices that support one or more policy statements, and begin to address the “who, what, where, and how” of achieving
a plan objective. Chanhassen’s initiatives may include: strategic directions for policies, ongoing practices, partnerships,
and future planning efforts; programmatic investments for events, training, and/or resources; capital investments for
facilities, amenities, and/or infrastructure; and potential funding streams and strategies.
Initiatives are organized by the topic areas of parks, facilities, trails, preserves, programming, and operations. The
following page contains a summary of the System Plan initiatives by topic area.
vi Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
implementation
Achieving the vision set forth in the Parks and Recreation System
Plan will take additional funding, not only for big, exciting, new
facilities like a signature recreation facility or interactive water
feature, but for neighborhood park revitalization, new programs,
and outreach, etc. The City needs to ensure that adequate funding
is available by identifying and regularly communicating system
funding needs, expanding and diversifying funding sources, and
maximizing the use of volunteers to support system development
and operations. The System Plan identifies initiatives for the
next 20 years in the areas of Capital Investments, Plans/Studies,
Management, Ongoing Initiatives, and Trails. The System Plan
also estimates that the system will need more than $8 million in
maintenance, repair, and replacement.
Parks
»maintain lake ann Park as the
premier community park
»add amenities to Bandimere,
city center, and lake susan
community Parks
»Use a maintenance and
replacement schedule to keep
neighborhood park facilities up
to date
»seek opportunities to expand the
park network to serve changing
community needs and preserve
natural amenities.
Preserves
»continue to preserve sensitive
lands within the Bluff creek
corridor
»collaborate with other agencies
to protect the seminary Fen
»collaborate with other agencies
to protect the minnesota river
Valley
»expand marketing & wayfinding
»expand opportunities to interact
with and explore nature
»identify & protect natural areas
that link parks, preserves, &
destinations
»Develop natural resource
management plan
Facilities
»identify and construct a year-
round signature recreation
facility in the community
»add a destination splash pad at a
community park
»establish an interpretative center
with outdoor lab space and
nature-based play
»add community-scale nature
play at a community park
and unstructured nature play
throughout the community as
appropriate
»improve user amenities at
existing facilities
»explore opportunities for a
second community garden
»implement recommendations of
the athletic Fields study
Programming
»continue to host at least 5 major
community events
»expand informal, year-round
events & nature-based programs
»collaborate with new & existing
partner organizations to provide
events & programming
»establish an event management
Plan
»annually assess pricing structure
trails
»address trail gaps and trail
crossing safety issues
»Work with partner agencies to
reopen minnesota river Bluff
lrt regional trail
»complete trail connection to
minnesota river
»increase maps and wayfinding
to identify loops, distances, &
destinations
»Provide more user amenities
»expand the number of natural
surface trails
»explore opportunities to add
trailheads
»initiate a single-track mountain
bike trail study
operations
»Use system Plan as basis
for budgeting & capital
improvement Plan
»incorporate sustainable design &
maintenance practices to make
chanhassen a model
»create a tobacco use policy
»communicate benefits of parks
and recreation
»establish formal review
process for program & event
development
summary of Plan initiatives
Priority cost (low)cost (High)
Short term $5,770,000 $12,660,000
Long term $31,075,000 $63,100,000
Ongoing $500,000 $5,000,000
Trail Gaps $4,943,000 $14,831,000
total $42,228,000 $95,591,000
Estimated Cost of
Signature Facility $25,000,000 $50,000,000
(Total Without
Signature Facility)
$17,288,000 $45,591,000
1-1 IntroductionSEPTEMBER 2017
1
Chapter 1InTroDuCTIon
Over its 50 years, Chanhassen’s Parks and Recreation System has improved the
community’s quality of life, economic development, and environmental resources. With
over 900 acres of parks and open space, 30 parks, and almost 80 miles of trails, the
Chanhassen Parks and Recreation System is an essential component of the City.
This System Plan was shaped by the Chanhassen community, and aims to forward the
City’s tradition of providing excellent parks and recreation by guiding investment and
development throughout the Parks and Recreation System over the next 20 years.
This Plan complements the directions established in the Comprehensive Plan, and
provides detailed guidance in the development, management, and operations of the
system. This direction is based on the community’s expressed needs and desires, as well
as analyses of demographic changes, future trends, and Chanhassen’s current system.
This Plan addresses community needs at a system-wide level. Specific initiatives, like the
development of an individual park, should be guided by this document, but will require
additional, detailed master planning.
1-2 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
Importance of Parks & recreation
When people talk about the places they love in the city or neighborhood,
parks are typically at the top of the list. They are sources of civic identity and
pride, and parks and recreation are also essential to the physical, economic,
environmental, and social health of cities and their residents. Quality parks,
along with schools and access to transportation, are typically the top three
criteria people consider when choosing a place to live.
Health
A healthy recreation and park system equals healthy residents. Simply put,
people who engage in regular physical activity are healthier and happier.
When people have access to parks, trails, and recreation, they exercise more.
In addition, increased exposure to natural areas has been linked to improved
physical and psychological health.
Recreation programs contribute to community health. Recreation programs
offered for all ages (families, youth, adults, and seniors) promote life-long
learning and a supportive community atmosphere. Specific programs can help
accomplish other community goals, such as education about sustainability or
youth development.
Recreation and Parks encourage play. Parks are often cited as people’s favorite
places. They are the places people go to have fun, relax, and play. Whether
it’s a place to play a game of soccer, garden with neighbors, take a quiet walk
through the woods or go on a vigorous run with the dog, a balanced park and
recreation system has something for everyone.
Property Values
Parks and open space increase property values. Numerous studies show that
proximity to parks, trails, and open spaces increases residential property
values. Parks and open space can also positively affect commercial property
and can be catalysts for redevelopment.
Beauty
Parks contribute to aesthetics. Parkways, tree-lined streets, gardens, lush
landscaped areas, views of rivers and lakes, stately woods, and public art are
all things that make a city a beautiful place to live, work, play, and shop. They
make essential contributions to a city’s livability and vitality.
keep up the great
work and enhance
our parks; one of the main
reasons we live here.
WHat We HearD
Townhomes Fronting Pioneer Pass Park
Girl walking on tree at the Arboretum by Jason Lehman
1-3 IntroductionSEPTEMBER 2017
natural Value & environmental Benefits
Parks and open space provide environmental benefits. Trees and vegetation
found in parks, preserves, and open spaces improve air and water quality.
These areas also play a role in managing stormwater runoff and protecting
natural areas.
cultural & social amenities
Parks preserve natural and cultural heritage. Significant natural features, such
as the Bluff Creek Preserve, numerous lakes, wildlife refuges, and Minnewashta
Regional Park, are preserved for today’s residents as well as for future
generations.
Parks have important social benefits. Parks are often the focal points of
neighborhoods. As places for neighborhood activities, celebrations, and
informal interaction they provide places for community members to come
together.
How to use the Plan
Chanhassen’s Parks and Recreation System Plan is organized into six chapters.
Chapter One introduces and provides context for the plan. Chapter Two
outlines national and local trends that impact current and future development
and the use of parks and recreation systems. Chapter Three provides an
overview of Chanhassen’s existing park system. Chapter Four contains the
vision and guiding principles that guide the future of Chanhassen’s Parks and
Recreation System. Chapter Five identifies the goals, policies, and initiatives
recommended to achieve the guiding principles. Chapter Six provides
implementation tools, including priorities to assist with future decision-making,
general cost estimates, potential funding sources, and a process to review
future project proposals.
Throughout the entire plan, gray call out boxes are used to provide
supplemental information to document text. Purple call out boxes highlight
some of the quotes from community members who participated in engagement
efforts conducted throughout the system planning process.
The system plan is supplemented by two appendices. The first appendix has
full page versions of the system maps. The second appendix has all of the
input received during the community engagement process.
It is important to recognize that the recommendations contained within this plan
do not constitute all possible future actions. Instead, this System Plan provides
a framework to guide future decision-making. Given the 20-year time frame,
it is anticipated that the System Plan may need to change as the community
responds to future trends, needs, and opportunities.
As a supplement to this document, a Park System Inventory was completed
that takes stock of the system’s existing amenities.
Fall Kayaking on Lake Ann by Sarah McGinn
Son & daughter walking at the Arboretum by Amy
Huang
1-4 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
Planning Process
This year-long planning effort began in August of 2016, and represents input
gathered from the community, stakeholders, city staff, and city officials.
Online questionnaires, meetings, focus groups, park and community tours,
open houses, and group brainstorming efforts guided the development of the
System Plan by providing valuable input and collective wisdom. The plan also
incorporates the expertise of the consultant team, analysis of benchmarking
data, a system-wide audit conducted by city staff and the consultants, and best
practices collected from other peer communities.
The planning process was guided by an Advisory Committee that met 7 times
throughout the process. The Chanhassen City Council and Park and Recreation
Commission provided guidance and input throughout every phase of the plan’s
development. Meetings between the project team and the City Council were
held on September 26, 2016, February 4, 2017, and September 11, 2017. The
Park and recreation Commission collaborated with the project team on December
13, 2016, March 28, 2017, July 25, 2017, and August 22, 2017.
community engagement
The goal of the planning process was to educate and raise awareness about
the importance of parks and recreation while ensuring that future investment
in Chanhassen’s system meets the needs of the community. Throughout this
planning process, over 1,000 residents and stakeholders were engaged to
ensure the final plan was reflective of community desires.
Public outreach efforts included:
»Six Advisory Committee meetings spread throughout the year-long planning
process
»Two listening sessions (Athletic Associations, Senior Center Commission)
»Three online questionnaires and two online interactive mapping exercises
which reached almost 2,000 individuals and solicited 1,500 responses
»Seven Pop-up meetings at community events
»A Community Open House held on April 6th of 2017, where over 70
community members provided feedback on the System Plan’s draft
recommendations
Open House Participants
Open House Sign
1-5 IntroductionSEPTEMBER 2017
Existing Plans
While this is the first Parks and Recreation System Plan for the City of
Chanhassen, several previous planning efforts helped guide the development
of this document.
»The National Citizen Survey conducted in 2013 and in 2016
»Parks and Recreation Annual Report
»2015 Athletic Facilities Study
»2030 Comprehensive Plan
»Bandimere Park Master Plan
»Fox Woods Preserve Master Plan
»County Road 61 Corridor Study
Coordinated Planning Efforts
Park system inventory
As part of this planning process, a Park System Inventory was developed to
take stock of every amenity present in Chanhassen’s existing system. The
creation of this document acted as a starting point for the audit of the City’s
existing conditions included in this Plan. The Park System Inventory provides
detailed maps and information regarding every park within the City and is
available on the City’s website.
chanhassen 2040 comprehensive Plan
This planning process corresponded with the development of the City’s 2040
Comprehensive Plan. A parks and recreation chapter was written based on the
recommendations established in this System Plan.
1-6 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
2-7 TrendsSEPTEMBER 2017
2
Chapter 2TrEnDS
In order to keep pace with the demands of a growing population, the
City of Chanhassen needs to consider how the dynamic nature of
technologies, trends, cultures, and activities will affect facility and
programming needs. The following chapter explores key trends and
their potential implications for the parks and recreation system.
By building flexibility into the City’s recreation and park facilities,
Chanhassen will be able to adapt quickly and efficiently in order to
meet these new demands.
2-8 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
Desire for conservation
& opportunities to
connect with nature
»72% of Americans see
conservation as an “extremely” or
“very” important role of parks and
recreation agencies
»Spending time in nature improves
creativity and problem-solving
abilities
»The Chanhassen 2016 National
Community Survey identified
natural play areas as one of the
top three desired facilities
Implications for Parks & Recreation
»Bringing naturalized habitats back
to parks (i.e. Turf reduction)
»Transition maintenance regimes
from mowing to weeding (less
time intensive but more skills
required)
»Preserve and provide access to
natural areas
»Offer educational/ interpretive
programs
»Balance active recreation offerings
with natural environments
»Include passive open space
»Need for signage and education
Desire to create more
memorable experiences
»The rise in social media as a
method to share experiences
through pictures and messages
»78% of millennials would choose
to spend money on a desirable
experience or event over buying
something desirable
»Growing popularity in games and
devices that utilize augmented
reality (i.e. Pokemon Go)
Implications for Parks & Recreation
»Distinctive programming
»Special events
»Integration of art
»Destination features
»Incorporating hashtags and other
social media-friendly components
»Embrace and incorporate new
technologies to get online-based
users into the parks
»Filming in the parks
increased importance of
‘Place’
»The increased mobility of the
workforce (telecommuting,
freelance work, etc.) has resulted
in individuals choosing where
they live based on lifestyle
and proximity to family and
friends rather than employment
opportunities
Implications for Parks & Recreation
»Co-production of services and
experiences
»Parks as economic generators
»Distinctive spaces, programs, and
events
»Placemaking in parks and public
places
»Integration of public art
»Destination amenities
»Memorable features
Rob Howard Photography Rob Howard Photography
2-9 TrendsSEPTEMBER 2017
more transient
»24% of U.S. adults reported
moving to a different city within
the United States in the past five
years
»The average American moves
11.7 times during the course of
their lifetime
Implications on Parks & Recreation
»Strong marketing and outreach
needed
»Adapt to changing residents
»Flexible and multifaceted
»Effective wayfinding
Demand for Green
alternatives
»Transportation (biking, walking,
transit)
»Stormwater treatment
»Maintenance practices
»Native/habitat restoration
»Education
»Local food systems
Implications for Parks & Recreation
»Need staff knowledge about
sustainable practices
»Increased interest in community
gardens
»Interest in year-round commuting
routes and amenities (bike racks,
lockers, showers) to support
transportation alternatives
»Need for improvements to, and
thoughtful management of, natural
areas
Pinched Government
Budgets
»Some cities are not investing in
the upkeep of their parks and
recreation system
»Deferring maintenance and
replacement creates a backlog
that can become hard to
address and leads to a negative
perception of system quality
Implications for Parks & Recreation
»Investing equitably and providing
even access to amenities across a
whole park system
»Keeping parks affordable
»Need for new and stable funding
sources
»Balancing new and existing
facilities; quality and quantity
2-10 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
increased interest in
aging actively
»America’s 65+ population is
projected to grow by 147%
between 2000 and 2050
»12.1% of Chanhassen residents
were 60+ in 2010, which is almost
double the percent of residents
over 60 in 2000
Implications for Parks & Recreation
»More senior recreation
»More mid-day recreation
programs
»Cater park and recreation facilities
to a variety of mobility and activity
levels
»Promote “fitting” types of outdoor
recreation (walking, gardening,
low-impact sports, etc.)
»Desire for volunteer opportunities
engaging new
Generations
»Children’s play has changed
from outdoors to indoors since
the 1950s, reducing people’s
connections to parks and nature
»The amount of unstructured play
in a child’s day is 4-7 minutes/day
on average
»22.6% of kids aged 9-13 reported
spending none of their free time
on physical activity in the past
week
»American teens average about
9 hours of screen time/ day
(excluding time spent at school or
for homework)
Implications on Parks & Recreation
»Add educational/ interpretive
programs that partner with
schools & after school programs
»Balance passive and active
recreation
»Offer spaces for unstructured,
exploratory, and creative play
»Offer adventures/ nontraditional
sport activities
»Incorporate technology into
exploration
increased interest in
Weight loss & active
living
»62.8% of adults in MN are either
overweight or obese
»Less than half of adults meet
suggested levels of physical
activity
»Obesity among children ages
6-19 has more than tripled since
the 1970s
»Every $1 spent on bike trails and
walking paths saves an estimated
$3 in health costs
»Communities that offer parks &
trails with outreach can increase
the number of people who
exercise >3 times/week by 25%
Implications on Parks & Recreation
»Park systems have an opportunity
to provide outdoor recreational
activities that encourage active
living & healthy lifestyles
»Convenient & well-connected
walking, running, and biking trails
»Accessible amenities
»Recreational options for all ages in
one place
Rob Howard Photography
2-11 TrendsSEPTEMBER 2017
rise in informal adult
recreation Versus
league Participation
»In 2011, participation in softball
leagues in Minnesota was half the
participation in 1994
»Basketball participation has
experienced a 75% decrease
since 1994
»Competition from other fitness
options (running/jogging,
bicycling, yoga) on the increase
Implications for Parks & Recreation
»Increase in demand for
specialized recreation facilities
(dog parks, splash pads, indoor
ice, etc.)
»Changing demand for traditional
sports facilities (diamond fields,
courts, etc.)
»Expanded interest in
entrepreneurs using parks for
classes and events
»Increased trail use (walking,
running, biking, etc.)
Popularity of new &
non-traditional sports
»Lacrosse has recently been the
fastest-growing high school sport
»Pickleball has become
increasingly popular, particularly
with Baby Boomers
»Minnesota winters are getting
shorter and warmer
»Other nontraditional sports include
skateboarding, rugby, ultimate
frisbee, disc golf, rock climbing,
single-track mountain biking etc.,
are on the rise
Implications for Parks & Recreation
»Requests for additional
specialized, single-use facilities
»Increased coordination needed to
accommodate new sports that use
fields similar to traditional sports
(i.e. Lacrosse)
»Potential for reduced demand for
current athletic facilities
»Increased demand for indoor ice
due to lower quality outdoor ice
and a shorter window for outdoor
skating
»More opportunities for outdoor
recreation in the winter months
accompany warmer temperatures
Demand for Group
Fitness events & races
»78% of millennials would choose
to spend money on a desirable
experience or event over buying
something desirable
»Participation in adventure races
grew 38% from 2012-2015,
making it the fastest growing
outdoor activity over that time
period
Implications for Parks & Recreation
»Provide spaces for flexible
programming
»Embrace partnerships with local
organizations for programming
»Utilize park and trail facilities
without interfering with daily users
»Capitalize on park space to
accommodate pre- and post-race
events
2-12 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
need for convenience
»The average American works 46.7
hours per week
»Two thirds of all recreation occurs
within a 30 minute drive from
home
»The mean travel time to work for
Chanhassen residents is 23.4
minutes
Implications for Parks & Recreation
»Need for near home recreation
»Flexible hours are needed
»Increased hours of operation
»Desire for individualized
schedules
»After school/work programs
increasingly anxious
about safety
»While trails are the City’s most
utilized facility based on the
Chanhassen Community Survey,
they are meeting the needs of less
than half of the respondents - the
majority of comments regarded
the safety of crossing busy
roadways
Implications for Parks & Recreation
»Better lighting
»Safer trails and parks
»Facilities closer to home
Sources:
»The Outdoor Foundation’s 2011 Outdoor
Recreation Topline Report
»NRPA’s 2016 Americans’ Engagement with Parks
Survey
»Minnesota’s SCORP 2014-2018
»USDA Forest Service Recreation Survey
»Leisure Time Studies by Hofferth & Sandberg,
Juster, and SGMA
»Youth Media Campaign Longitudinal Survey
»Parks & Trails Council of Minnesota: Minnesota’s
Parks, Trails, and Public Health (2014)
»American Heart Association
3-13 Existing ConditionsSEPTEMBER 2017
Chapter 3ExISTIng ConDITIonS
3
The foundation of system planning lies in understanding its
existing conditions. A Park System Inventory was conducted
at the beginning of this planning process, which involved
identifying and mapping all of Chanhassen’s current park and
recreation amenities. This audit is a standalone document that
can be found on the City’s website.
This chapter combines the system audit with demographic data,
a gap and distribution analysis, the results of the first phase
of community engagement, peer communities, and national
standards to establish how well the City is currently serving the
needs of the community, as well as how well it is positioned to
meet any future needs that may arise.
3-14 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
Figure 3-1. Community Context
Community Context
The City of Chanhassen encompasses 14,427 acres of
land in the western portion the Twin Cities Metropolitan
Area. While the majority of this acreage is located in Carver
County, 154 acres in the eastern portion of the City are
in Hennepin County. Five major highways travel through
the City, providing easy connections to surrounding
metropolitan areas.
With twelve beautiful lakes, two public school districts,
30 parks, a wide range of housing options, and over 700
businesses, Chanhassen offers residents and visitors alike
a great destination for shopping, eating, entertainment,
commerce, and recreation.
Demographic overview
Population
Chanhassen’s population has increased significantly over
the past 50 years, growing from 244 in 1960 to just under
23,000 in 2010. According to the Metropolitan Council, this
growth is expected to continue moving forward, with 37,100
residents projected for the year 2040; almost 15,000 more
residents than were reported at the 2010 census.
age
According to the U.S. Decennial Census, the largest age
cohorts in the City in 2010 were 45-49 and 50-54, which
are closely followed by the 10-14 age cohort. With the
20-24 and 25-29 age cohorts being some of the smallest,
Chanhassen seemingly contains many families with
younger children, but are lacking in young professionals.
Over 12% of the population is older than 60, a figure
that has doubled since the 2000 census. Demographic
changes will alter the labor force and also impact
preferences for transportation, housing, and park needs.
For instance, both millennials and seniors will be seeking
walkable neighborhoods and expanded trail facilities.
3-15 Existing ConditionsSEPTEMBER 2017
race + ethnicity
In 2014, the majority of Chanhassen’s population identified as white (91%).
Of the remaining 9%, 6% identified as Asian, 1.4% identified with two or more
races, 1% identified as Black or African American, and less than 1% identified
as American Indian or Alaskan Native. Just over 2% of the population identified
as Hispanic or Latino.
Households
The total number of households in Chanhassen has increased by over 2,000
units since 2000. While the majority of households in the City are occupied by
families (75%), the number of family households with children decreased by
over 100 and the amount of non-family households increased by 5% between
2000 and 2010. These statistics are representative of a larger trend towards
smaller households, resulting in an increase in the total number of households;
an increase in the percentage of married couple, no children households; and
an increase in the percentage of households with individuals over 65.
income
Chanhassen is an affluent City, with over 50% of all households and almost 65%
of all families earning an income of over $100,000. Both median household
and family incomes have increased by over $20,000 since 2000, and was
at $108,078 and $125,303 respectively in 2014 according to the American
Community Survey. In comparison, both the Twin Cities Metro Area’s median
household income ($68,019) and the average median household income of
surrounding municipalities ($99,524) was lower than that of Chanhassen for
2014.
While the City’s 2.9% poverty rate is stable and well below the national poverty
rate of 15.6%, consideration still needs to be given to whether the Park and
Recreation system is sufficiently serving those with limited incomes, particularly
by providing access to facilities within a walking or biking distance.
education
Of Chanhassen residents 25 and older, 96% have achieved at least a high
school diploma, 60% have obtained a Bachelor’s degree or higher, and
almost 19% have obtained a Graduate or Professional degree. These figures
have remained relatively steady since 2000, and are comparable to those of
surrounding communities.
Under 5
5 to 9
10 to 14
15 to 19
20 to 24
25 to 29
30 to 34
35 to 39
40 to 44
45 to 49
50 to 54
55 to 59
60 to 64
65 to 69
70 to 74
75 to 79
80 to 84
85 and over
50.9% Female 49.1% Male
Figure 3-2. Historic Population and Metropolitan Council Population Forecasts
128 132 182 244 4,879
6,359
11,732
20,321 22,952
26,700
31,700
37,100
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
Figure 3-3. Age & Gender Distribution
Figure 3-4. Median Household Income
$108,078 $76,301 $95,697 $131,833 $113,719 $80,068 $-
$20,000
$40,000
$60,000
$80,000
$100,000
$120,000
$140,000
aVeraGe $99,524
3-16 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
system at a Glance
»Almost 1,000 acres of city-
owned parks, preserves, and
open space
»30 community &
neighborhood parks
»14 preserves & 1 special
use park
»Almost 80 miles of trails
Facilities
27 playground areas
21 picnic shelters
5 swimming beaches
16 tennis courts
10 pickleball courts
28 diamond fields
21 rectangular fields
20 basketball courts
6 sledding hills
4 sand volleyball courts
1 skate park
1 disc golf course
1 garden plot site
7 docks & 3 fishing piers
5 outdoor hockey rinks & 5
pleasure rinks
1 dog park (in partnership)
1 recreation center
System at a glance
The Chanhassen Park and Recreation Department manages almost 1,000
acres of parkland, almost 80 miles of trails, and two major indoor community
facilities; the Recreation Center and the Senior Center. These amenities offer
area residents, employees, and visitors numerous opportunities for active
and passive recreation while providing invaluable benefits to the community’s
ecosystem and users’ physical and mental health.
system History
Chanhassen’s Park and Recreation System is the result of almost 50 years
of planning and City and citizen commitment. In addition to adding parks
and trails to the system in conjunction with development, the community has
supported major park improvement initiatives throughout the years.
Three major bond referendums over the system’s history have allowed for major
Park and Recreation improvements. The first bond referendum for parks was
passed in 1969, resulting in the acquisition of Lake Ann Park, the beginning of
the neighborhood park system; and the preservation of community character
that is enjoyed by residents to this day. In 1988, the City saw its second bond
referendum, which funded phase two of Lake Ann Park as well as the purchase
of park land in the southern half of the City. Another referendum was passed in
1996, resulting in: improvements in 18 parks system-wide; the construction of
Bandimere Park; the reconstruction of City Center Park; preservation of over 40
acres of open space; and seven miles of new community trails.
Park classification
Today, the City’s park and recreation needs are met by a combination of:
city parks; city trails and sidewalks; school district facilities; private facilities;
recreation programs; as well as non-city amenities including regional parks
and trails and facilities in surrounding communities. Park classifications are
used to ensure that a park and recreation system has sufficient diversity and
geographic distribution to serve various neighborhood and community needs.
In Chanhassen, there are four types of parks: community, neighborhood,
special use, and preserves.
Community Parks
Community Parks provide opportunities for City-wide recreation and typically
serve a 1-2 mile area. They emphasize active recreation by providing amenities
like ball fields and soccer/football fields. Chanhassen’s six community parks
are distributed throughout the City and most residents live within an easy
drive or bike-ride. Over the next 20 years it is anticipated that additional land
for community park facilities will be needed to serve the community. Because
most of the new residential growth is anticipated to occur in two areas, south of
Lyman Boulevard and on the west side of Lake Ann, it makes sense to look for
new or expanded community parks in these areas.
Chanhassen currently has six Community Parks, including Bandimere Park,
City Center Park, Lake Ann Park, Lake Susan Park, South Lotus Lake Park, and
the Recreation Center.
3-17 Existing ConditionsSEPTEMBER 2017
Lake Ann P ark
Lake Susan
Park
Bandimere
Park
City Center
Park
Chanhassen
Recreation Center
South Lotus
Lake Par k
Kerber P ond P ark
Power Hill Pa rk
Riley Ridge P ark
Nort h Lot us
La ke P ark
Meadow
Green Pa rk
Herman Field
Park
Pheas ant Hill
Park
Sunset R idge
Park
Stone C reek
Park
Pione er
Pass Park
Roundhouse Park
Curry Fa rm s
Park
Chanhass en
Hills Park
Carv er Bea ch
Park
Cathc art P ark
(O wne d by the
City of S hore wood)
Sugarbush Park
Prairie K noll
Park
Ric e Marsh
La ke P ark
Bandimere
Heights Park
Greenwood
Shores Park
Carv er Bea ch
Playground
Minnewas ht a
Height s Park
Chanhass en
Es tate s Pa rk
Chanhass en High School
(J oint Fa cilities)
Manchest er Park
(To B e Com plete d
in 2018)
Mi n ne w a s h t a
R e gi on a l P a r k
U ni v e r s it y o f M in ne s ot a
La n d s c ap e A r bo r e t u m
R a gu e t W ild l if e
Ma na g e m e n t A r e a
Pr iv a t e l y O w n e d
Pu bl ic G o lf C o u r s e
MN V a l le y N a t i o na l
Wi ld li f e R e fug e
Ols on C ommunit y
Garden
Minnet onka Middle
School West
CenturyBoulevardHazeltineBoulevardBluffCreek
Drive
West 78th S treet
Lyman Bou levard ChanhassenRoadCrosstow n Boulevard
Pleas a nt Vi e wRoad
GreatPlai
n
s
Boulev
a
r
dBa
varia
R
o
a
dSmithtownRoad
P i o n eerT railW estL o n g a c resDriv eVictoriaDrive
Arboretu m B o ule va r d Power
sBoul
evardKerberBoulevardLake Lucy Road
MinnewashtaParkwayCounty Road 14 0
L ake DriveEast
He ronDrive
Engler Boulevard
H un d ertm arkRoadEastGalpinBoulevardAudubonRoadPion eer Trail
82nd Street West
F ly in g C lo u d D r iv e
Chas k a B o u le v ardL akeDrive
Pioneer Trail EastChestnutStreetNorthWest82ndStreet
")140
")53
¬«101
¬«7
£¤212
¬«5
")61
¬«101
¬«101
L
o
t
usL
a
k
eL a k e
S u s a n
LakeRileyR iceL akeLakeMinnewashta
LakeAn n
L a keL ucyR i c e M a r shLake
E d e n
P r a i r i e
E x c e l s i o r
G r e e n w o o d
M i n n e t o n k aShorewood
T o n k a
B a y
J a c k s o n
T w p .
S h a k o p e e
C h a s k a
V i c t o r i a
LEGEN D
Op en Space
Comm unity Park
Neigh borho od Pa rk
Preserve
Specia l Us e
No n-City Parks & Open Sp ac e
Publi c Sch ool
Surround ing M unicipal Park s
Water Bod ies
Muni cip al Bou ndaries °0 0.5 10.25
Mil es
Figure 3-5. City Park Distribution
3-18 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
Tennis League
Neighborhood Parks
The goal of neighborhood parks is to provide informal recreational opportunities
close to where people live. Chanhassen operates under the standard that
all residents should be within walking distance, or about a half mile, of a
neighborhood park. The walking distance must also be free of major barriers
like major roads or water bodies to count as adequate. Because community
parks often act as neighborhood parks for the people living in close proximity,
a half mile radius is applied to both neighborhood and community parks to
identify any gaps in service.
There are 23 Neighborhood Parks distributed throughout Chanhassen,
22 of which are City owned and operated. Cathcart Park is located within
Chanhassen and acts as a neighborhood park for residents north of Lake
Minnewashta, but is owned by the City of Shorewood.
Special Use Parks
Special Use Parks are park facilities and amenities that target a specific user
group and are not associated with an existing park. Olson Community Garden
is the City’s only Special Use Park, and is a popular amenity in the community.
Preserves
Preserves function to protect the City’s high quality natural space, and usually
involve minimal low-impact development. The City currently owns over 500
acres of open space protected throughout Chanhassen’s fourteen preserves.
These acres encompass a large portion of the Bluff Creek Corridor, as well as
other treasured wetland and woodland areas.
notable Facilities
City Facilities
Recreation Center
The Chanhassen Recreation Center provides the community with year-round
indoor and outdoor recreational facilities. The Recreation Center is a focal
point for many of the City’s community events and recreation activities and
programs. The staff at the Recreation Center takes pride in providing a fun
and friendly atmosphere for people of all ages at an affordable price. Facilities
at the Recreation Center include a gymnasium, fitness room, aerobics/dance
studios, five meeting rooms, and outdoor ball fields, tennis and pickleball
courts, and hockey/inline skating rinks. Due to the popularity of the programs
(especially dance) and the lack of meeting space throughout the community,
the Recreation Center is often completely rented out.
Senior Center
Chanhassen’s Senior Center is a popular and highly utilized amenity for
retirees, and is centrally located within the City Hall. The Senior Center provides
senior programming including field trips, art and education classes, health and
wellness programs, card games, and woodcarving.
Recreation Center Weight Room
Olson Community Garden
Senior Center Card Playing Event
3-19 Existing ConditionsSEPTEMBER 2017
Non-City Parks & Open Space
There are several non-city parks and open spaces located in Chanhassen. The locations of these facilities are highlighted
in purple in Figure 3-5.
Schools (ISD 276 & 112)
The public schools in Chanhassen partner with the City to
offer facilities for public use outside of school hours. The
City has agreements for shared use at Chanhassen High
School for school athletic fields. Bluff Creek Elementary
School shares facilities with Chanhassen Recreation
Center, while Chanhassen Elementary School shares
facilities with City Center Park. While there is not a specific
shared use agreement, Minnetonka Middle School West’s
facilities assist in addressing needs for surrounding
residential neighborhoods.
Lake Minnewashta Regional Park
This 330 acre Regional Park on the east side of Lake
Minnewashta is owned and operated by Carver County
with support from the Metropolitan Council. Facilities
include: lake access, a fishing pier, picnicking, sand
volleyball, a swimming beach, and trails. A new off-leash
dog area was established in partnership with Carver
County, the City of Chanhassen, and the City of Shorewood
Parks Foundation. A fee is required for use.
Camp Tanadoona
Camp Tanadoona was started by the Minneapolis Camp
Fire Girls in 1924 and consists of 63 acres of land on Lake
Minnewashta, south of Lake Minnewashta Regional Park.
Today the camp serves both boys and girls and offers
overnight and day camps.
MN DNR Lands
The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources protects
several areas of land within Chanhassen. An 8 acre parcel
on the east side of Lotus Lake is preserved as open
space. The DNR also owns 106 acres of the 600-acre
Seminary Fen wetlands complex in southern Chanhassen,
which contains a Scientific and Natural Area (SNA) that
encompasses 73 acres and protects a rare calcareous
fen and threatened plant species. The remaining 33 acres
were allotted to the adjacent Raguet WMA. Finally, the DNR
owns public land surrounding Lake St. Joe, which is just
south of Roundhouse Park in northwest Chanhassen.
Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge
There are approximately 60 acres of the Minnesota Valley
National Wildlife Refuge within the City. The refuge was
established in 1976 to provide habitat for migratory
waterfowl, fish, and other wildlife species. Today the refuge
is comprised of 14,000 acres stretching 45 miles from Fort
Snelling State Park to Belle Plain, Minnesota. While some
areas of the refuge have trails and interpretive signs, there
are no public recreation facilities in Chanhassen.
Raguet Wildlife Management Area (WMA)
The Raguet Wildlife Management Area encompasses 270
acres, 190 of which are located in Chanhassen. The WMA
is entirely within the floodplain of the Minnesota River.
Natural communities include floodplain forest, wetland
areas, and grassland. The management emphasis is
maintaining and improving habitat for wetland species. The
only public recreation access is for hunting.
The Minnesota Landscape Arboretum
The Minnesota Landscape Arboretum is a 1,000 acre
facility, 675 acres of which are located in west Chanhassen.
The Arboretum is a unit of the University of Minnesota
and is a public botanical garden and an education and
research institution. It features display gardens and
exhibits, model landscapes, restored native landscapes,
plant research plots as well as extensive plant collections,
and hiking and cross country skiing trails. Educational
offerings include children’s programs, family activities,
adult education, therapeutic horticulture, and the Anderson
Horticultural Library. The Arboretum hosts several public
festivals every year as well. A fee is required for use.
Golf Courses
There are three privately owned Golf Courses within the
City of Chanhassen, all located south of Pioneer Trail.
Bluff Creek Golf Course is a 228 acre 18 hole course, Hall
Greens is a 45 acre 9 hole course, and the Golf Zone is
approximately 100 acres just north of the Raguet WMA and
includes an all-weather driving range, putting and chipping
greens, a 9 hole course, and a 18 hole putting course.
Lake Minnewashta Regional Park Minnesota Valley National Wildlife RefugeMinnesota Landscape Arboretum
3-20 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
needs Assessment
To understand the state of Chanhassen’s Park and Recreation System, this
planning process involved conducting a critical evaluation of the City’s existing
conditions, peer communities, national standards and trends, best practices,
and community input. These analyses identified current and future needs and
desires, which subsequently guided the development of guiding principles
and goals, policies, and initiatives that work together to guide the future of the
system.
The evaluation process included:
»Meetings with the City Staff, Advisory Committee, Park Board, and the City
Council
»Two phases of community input to gather feedback on existing conditions
and future desires
»Evaluation of the entire system of parks, trails, natural resources,
connectivity, programs, and facilities, including an update of the Park
System Inventory
»Demographic analysis
»Evaluation of current park classification system and standards
»Evaluation of service areas, future growth, and development needs
»Identification of issues and opportunities at a system-wide level
»Comparison of existing supply, quality, and distribution of features and
facilities to national standards and to peer communities
»Evaluation of emerging trends influencing future needs of the system
community input
A variety of community engagement activities were completed over the course
of this project to ensure the project remained reflective of community desires.
This input helped identify satisfaction with the existing park system, the level of
Park and Recreation use, opinions on the system’s needs, issues, and priorities,
and desires for future system development. While opportunities to attend
community events and hold stakeholder meetings were explored throughout
the process, there were two major phases aimed at collecting public input, the
first in fall of 2016 and the second in spring of 2017.
Resident and stakeholder outreach methods included:
»Seven Community Pop-Up Events
»Athletic Association Stakeholder Meeting
»Senior Stakeholder Meeting
»Three Online Community Questionnaires
»Two Online Social PinPoint Maps
»Community Open House
For a summary of all community input results, refer to Appendix #.
Pop-Up Event
Advisory Committee members
3-21 Existing ConditionsSEPTEMBER 2017
CHANHASSEN PARKS & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN
Online Community Engagement Summary
Four different online engagement strategies were implemented
in order to reach as many demographics as possible. Three online questionnaires
captured public comments regarding the senior center, the recreation center, and the
parks and recreation system in general. The fourth online strategy involved an
interactive mapping software intended to collect geographic-based comments.
This summary includes a synopsis of some of the significant findings from all four
engagement techniques. 1 % never 34%
e
v
e
r
y
d
ay 48% once a week 10% once a monthHow Often
Respondents
Utilize
Chan Parks
& Rec
8% few times a year 80%
52%
35%
75% 74%
72%
47%
29%
26%
66%
52%
21%
11%
6%
Respondents’
Favorite Facilities
By Percent
Respondents’
Favorite Programs
By Percent
neighborhood parks
trails
community parks
beaches
recreation center
preserves/natural areas
diamondelds
rectangularelds
ice skatingrinks
18% tenniscourts
6% pickleballcourts
communityevents
youthactivities
familyactivities
adulttness
adultpickleball
2
1
3
4
edenprairie
victoria
excelsior
chaska
Top 4 Destinations
For Non-Chan Parks &
Recreation Facilities
Top 3 Desired Facilities
natural play areas
75%
outdoor pool
60%
indoor pool
72%
Under 50% Needs Met Over 50% Needs Met Not Utilized
preserve/natural areas
youth sports and classes
trails
adult sports and classes
recreation center
0%20%40%60%80%100%
46%
21%17%
15%78%
44%14%
13%71%
31%23%
62%
42%
7%
16%
Top 5 Unmet Facility & Programming Needs
“While private rec facilities
should ll the gaps in
programming, something like an
outdoor swimming pool should be
seriously considered as a city run
facility. Lifetime is the only option
in the city and is not affordable for
all.”
“We are lacking in facilities to
support our population here. A
larger sports complex is needed.”
“Keep up the great work
and enhance our parks;
one of the main reasons
we live here.”
“Improving our existing rec
center would add value and
encourage pride in our
community. It should be a top
priority.”
Select General Comments
Figure 3-6. Key Findings From the Fall System-Wide Questionnaire
3-22 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
Importance of Additional Facilities &
Programming
0%20%40%60%
50%
80%100%
moreprogramming 73%27%
tn ess classspace 73%27%
large meeting/event room 70%30%
indoor pool 39%61%
tn essequipment 39%61%
kitchen facility 40%60%
indoor track 44%56%
garden 64%36%
hot tub 26%74%
sport court 76%24%
theater 56%44%
café or coffeeshop 44%56%
Important Not Important
While all responses to the Senior Center survey were evaluated, only those from
respondents over the age of 60 were considered for the charts included in this infographic.
However, the comments included below are representative of all participating age groups. 1% never 34%
e
v
e
r
y
d
ay
48% once a week 10% once a monthSENIOR CENTER
Select General Comments 31% never 1 % e very day 33
%
o
nce a week 11% once a month 24% few times a yearHow Often
Respondents
Utilize
the Senior
Center
40%
are unaware of it are not interested in what
it has to offer
24%
use a senior center in
another community
12%
Of Respondents That
Never Use the
Senior Center:
Other Popular Responses:
Women’s Club
Driver’s Safety Class
Chan-O-Laires
0%
60%
51%
42%
eld trip 29%
health orwellness program 4%woodcarving
art or educationclass
27%card playing
Existing Facility & Programming Usage
100%0%20%40%60%80%
Very Supportive Somewhat Supportive Not at All Supportive
Support For Senior Center Alternatives
build a new senior
center adjacent to the
recreation center 35%40%25%
maintain the existing
senior center as it is 43%37%20%
relocate the senior
center to a new, larger
facility 37%48%15%
“I am proud of what
the existing Senior
Center offers in relation
to programming but we
will be out growing the
facility with the shift in
retirees. And we do
have a dynamic and
hard-working director
in Sue!!”
“From what I've seen, there
isn't much offered for Senior
Citizens that still work
full-time. I would like to see
some programs offered
evenings or weekends.”
“As the population ages
Chanhassen needs a
viable senior center. The
one we have is very small
and does not have enough
programs. A theater and
art space are very
important to me.”
“Please keep the bus
trips so we can get to
places we can't drive
to and that have
limited parking.”
“The location of the Chanhassen Sr. Center
appears to be superb! It is easy to locate, access
for pleasure and emergencies if needed. If you
are considering a new community center please
include the senior's space: Chaska's community
center where all ages and all activities can
participate is the ultimate (even church studies,
meetings, etc.)”
Figure 3-7. Key Findings From the Fall Senior Center Questionnaire
3-23 Existing ConditionsSEPTEMBER 2017
This survey was geared toward people who utilize the Recreation Center’s
facilities and programming, regardless of whether or not they are a resident of
Chanhassen. All of the questions specifically pertain to the Recreation Center
rather than the park system as a whole.
RECREATION CENTER
20% neve r 5 % every day 24
%
o
nce a week 9% once a month 42% few times a yearHow Often
Respondents
Utilize the Rec
Center
13%
are unaware of ituse private recreation
facilities
18%
are not interested in what
it has to offer
35%
use a recreation center in
another community
18%
Other Popular Responses:
Youth Sports
0%
50% 39%
35%
attended anevent 27%
utilized thetness center 22%
attendedopen gymopenpickleball
participated ina class
26% 16%
9%
hosted or attendeda meetinghosted or attendeda birthday party
Existing Facility & Programming Usage
“I hope it can expand, perhaps by
moving to a new building and
leaving the full building for an
expansion of Bluff Creek.”
“It is a very nice facility. I
exercise there 3 days a week.
The staff is friendly and helpful.”
“The rec center needs to ll the needs
of all community members. Currently,
I feel the programming has a focus on
children and families...”
“We would LOVE to go if you had
swimming lessons in an indoor
pool, and much more creative
classes to choose from (art, clay,
music, theater....)”
“More pickleball courts. As this sport
grows, so should the number of courts.”
“An indoor public pool and
walking track like Chaska Comm.
Center....the private clubs are so
costly!”
“We need an economical
alternative to the expensive and
overly busy Lifetime Fitness.
Doesn't need to be fancy but
something more like a YMCA or
the Chaska Community Center.”
50%
0%20%40%60%80%100%
Of Respondents That
Never Use the
Recreation Center:
Importance of Additional Facilities
& Programming
running/walking track 85%15%
kitchen facilities inmeeting rooms 69%31%
additional technologyin meeting rooms (screen,projector, etc.)66%34%
senior center 56%44%
"health" snack bar 54%46%
a seasonal domedmulti-purpose e ld house 39%61%
more exercise/class studios 28%72%
larger tn essc enter 20%80%
indoor pool 19%81%
Select General Comments
Important Not Important
Figure 3-8. Key Findings From the Fall Recreation Center Questionnaire
3-24 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
“Can Chanhassen and other cities
work to get a path all the way from 5
to downtown Excelsior?”
“The city already
has a future trail
connection
planned from
Lake Lucy to
Lake Ann Park.
Make it happen!”
identied trail gaps
22
“Bringing a full loop
path around Lake Ann
would be a huge
advancement in running
options for the city.”
identied missing facilities23
“More painted/
signed
crosswalks
would be nice
on Audubon as
there is lots of
fast moving
trafc.”“Consider adding a
shing dock accessible
from North Lotus Park.”
“[Southeast of Bluff Creek
Preserve] is another
wooded area that would be
nice to preserve in its
natural state and have
public access allowed.”
“We love the proposed
trails near Lake Lucy
and Lake Ann but do
not want any of
Prince's land to be
developed! Keep land
as a preserve!”
57
identied areasthey like
“I love [the] walking
path behind the High
School and how we
are maintaining the
natural area here.”
“The tunnel under 41 is a great way
to get to the Minnewashta trails.”
63 identied areasthat need work
“Need a safe
way to cross
Highway 5 at
Powers.
Underground
tunnel?”
“The trails around Lake Susan need
improvement. Very cracked, pitted, bumpy and
uneven. Have seen people trip and fall.”
“The Chanhassen Rec
Center is sub-standard
compared to other
adjacent towns. We could
denitely improve it. Aim
high, add an indoor
skating rink and a pool.”
SOCIAL PINPOINT
» The majority of comments across all categories were in reference to the trail
system
» While “Like it” contained a high number of responses, many were constructive as
well as positive, pointing out missing facilities, trail gaps, and potential
opportunities
» Many comments urged the City to maintain land around Lake Ann as natural, open
space, and suggested the only development be hiking or skiing trails
» Tunnels were highlighted as an important amenity for respondents, and many
expressed desire for more along Highway 5, especially in closer proximity to the
Minnesota Landscape Arboretum
Social Pinpoint is an online platform that helps users place
geographically-referenced comments in the following categories: “Like it,”
“Needs Work,” “Missing Facility,” and “Trail Gap.” This method of
engagement received almost 170 responses distributed throughout the City,
which can be seen on the map below. A selection of the most popular
comments are displayed ot the right by category.
Key Findings
1
2
3
4
Like It
Needs Work
Missing Facility
Trail Gap
Figure 3-9. Key Findings From the Fall Social PinPoint
3-25 Existing ConditionsSEPTEMBER 2017
system components & condition
In the 2016 National Citizen Survey, residents indicated that they highly value
Recreation and Wellness opportunities in Chanhassen and ranked the City’s
health and wellness, recreational and fitness opportunities, and preventive
health services to be higher than other communities across the country. The
survey also indicated that 9 out of 10 residents frequently make use of the City’s
wide array of recreational opportunities. The City will work to maintain these
high standards moving into the future by ensuring the system continues to meet
community needs.
Parks
Chanhassen’s 30 parks comprise 888 acres of City land, providing 36 acres of
parkland per 1,000 residents. While the City’s park acreage exceeds national
standards as well as that of surrounding communities, the number of parks
is fewer than average. With the expected population growth of over 10,000
new residents in the next 10 to 20 years, the City should continue to look
into expanding the number and distribution of parks as opportunities arise.
Emphasis should be placed on currently underserved areas, as well as future
areas anticipated to be developed with medium and high density housing. At
existing parks, user amenities like lighting, benches, grills, wifi, and permanent
restrooms were suggested as potential improvements.
Accessibility to parks is excellent within the community’s core. This access is
complimented by successful partnerships with school facilities and access to
amenities in surrounding communities. However, pockets of low accessibility
exist in the northwest due to the barriers of Lake Minnewashta, major roadways,
and large lot residential development. While this is a gap, it should be noted
that Lake Minnewashta Regional Park fulfils the role of a community park in this
area. In the south, accessibility is reduced due to fewer parks, major roadways,
and large lot residential development. Consideration of park access in the
south should occur as development of low, medium, or high density housing
occurs. Overall, the construction of additional grade-separated roadway
crossings would also help improve park access.
Carver Beach Park
Pioneer Pass Park
love all the
programs, trails
and parks available to us in
chanhassen
WHat We HearD
3-26 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
Lake A nn Park
Lake Susan
Park
Bandimere
Park
City Center
Park
Chanhassen
Recreation C ent er
South Lotus
Lake Par k
Kerber P ond Park
Power Hill Pa rk
Riley Ridge Park
Nort h Lot us
Lake P ark
Meadow
Green Pa rk
Herman Field
Park
Pheas ant Hill
Park
Sunset R idge
Park
Stone C reek
Park
Pione er
Pass Park
Roundhouse P ark
Curry Fa rm s
Park
Chanhassen
Hills Park
Carv er Bea ch
Park
Cat hc art Park
(O wne d by t he
City of S hore wood)
Sugarbush Pa rk
Prairie K noll
Park
Ric e Marsh
La ke Park
Bandimere
Height s Park
Greenwood
Shores P ark
Carv er Bea ch
Playground
Minnewashta
Heights Park
Chanhass en
Es tate s Pa rk
Chanhass en High S chool
(J oint Fa cilities)
Manchest er Park
(To Be Com pleted
in 2018)
Mi n ne w a s h t a
R e gi on a l P a r k
U ni v e r s it y o f M in ne s ota
La n d s c a p e A r bo r e t u m
R a gu e t W ild l if e
Ma na g e m e n t A r e a
Pr iv at e l y O wn e d
Pu bl ic G o lf C o u r s e
MN Va l le y N a ti o na l
Wi ld li fe R e f ug e
Ols on Communit y
Garden
Minnet onka Middle
School West
CenturyBoulevardHazeltineBoulevardBluffCreek
Drive
West 78th S t reet
Lyman Boulevard ChanhassenRoadCrosstow n Boulevard
Ple asant Vi e wRo ad
GreatPlain
s
Boulev
a
r
dBa
varia
R
o
a
dSmithtownRoad
P i o n eerT railW estL o n g a c resDriv eVictoriaDrive
Arboretu m Bo ule va r d Powe
r
sBoul
evardKerberBoulevardLake Lucy Road
MinnewashtaParkwayCounty Road 140
L ake DriveEast
He ronDrive
Engler Boulevard
H un d ertm arkRoadEastGalpinBoulevardAudubonRoadPion ee r Trail
82nd Street West
F ly in g C lo u d D r iv e
Chas k a B o u le v ardLakeDrive
Pioneer Trail EastChestnutStreetNorthWest82ndStreet
")140
")53
¬«101
¬«7
£¤212
¬«5
")61
¬«101
¬«101
L
o
t
usL
a
k
eL a k e
S u s a n
LakeRileyR iceL akeLakeMinnewashta
LakeA n n
L a keL ucyR i c e M a r shLake
E d e n
P r a i r i e
E x c e l s i o r
G r e e n w o o d
M i n n e t o n k aShorewood
T o n k a
B a y
J a c k s o n
T w p .
S h a k o p e e
C h a s k a
V i c t o r i a
LEGEND
Comm unity Park s
Ne ighborho od Pa rks
1/2 Mil e Buffe r*
Non-City Parks & Open S pac e
Public Sch ool
Surround ing M unicipal Park s
Water Bod ies
Municipal Bou ndaries
2030 Planned Land Use
Medium/High Den sity Re si den tial
Low Dens ity Res ide ntial
Large Lot Res ide ntia l
Non-Reside ntia l Lan d Use
*Majo r roadways are barriers
fo r pe des trian ac cess , an d
limit the re ach of m any 1/2
mile park bu ffers thro ugh ou t
th e C ity
°0 0.5 10.25
Mil es
Figure 3-10. Neighborhood Park Access
3-27 Existing ConditionsSEPTEMBER 2017
Lake Ann P ark
Lake Susan
Park
Bandimere
Park
City Center
Park
Chanhassen
Recreation Cent er
South Lotus
Lake Par k
Kerber P ond P ark
Power Hill Pa rk
Riley Ridge P ark
North Lot us
La ke P ark
Meadow
Green Pa rk
Herman Field
Park
Pheas ant Hill
Park
Sunset R idge
Park
Stone C reek
Park
Pione er
Pass Park
Roundhouse Park
Curry Fa rm s
Park
Chanhass en
Hills Park
Carv er Bea ch
Park
Cathc art P ark
(O wne d by t he
City of Shore wood)
Sugarbush Pa rk
Prairie K noll
Park
Ric e Marsh
La ke Park
Bandimere
Height s Park
Greenwood
Shores P ark
Carv er Bea ch
Playground
Minnewas ht a
Height s Park
Chanhass en
Es tate s Pa rk
Chanhass en High School
(J oint Fa cilities)
Manchest er Park
(To Be Com plet ed
in 2018)
Mi n ne w a s h t a
R e gi on a l P a r k
U ni v e r s it y o f M in ne s ot a
La n d s c a p e A r bo r e tu m
R a gu e t W ild l if e
Ma na g e m e n t A r e a
P r iv a t e l y O wn e d
P u bl ic G o lf C o u r s e
MN Va l le y N a ti o na l
Wi ld li fe R e f ug e
Ols on C ommunit y
Garden
Minnet onka Middle
School W est
CenturyBoulevardHazeltineBoulevardBluffCreek
Driv
e
West 78th S t reet
Lyman Boulevard ChanhassenRoadCros st o w n B oulevard
Pleas a nt Vi e wRo ad
GreatPlai
n
s
Boulev
a
r
dBa
varia
R
o
a
dSmithtownRoad
P i o n e erT railW estL o n g a c resDriv eVictoriaDrive
Arb oretu m B o ule va r d Power
sBoul
evardKerberBoulevardLake Lucy Road
MinnewashtaParkwayCounty Road 140
L ake DriveEast
He ronDrive
Engler Boulevard
H un d ertm arkRoadEastGalpinBoulevardAudubonRoadPion eer Trail
82nd Street West
F ly in g C lo u d D r iv e
Chas k a B o u le v ardLakeDrive
Pioneer Trail EastChestnutStreetNorthWest82ndStreet
")140
")53
¬«101
¬«7
£¤212
¬«5
")61
¬«101
¬«101
L
o
t
usL
a
k
eL a k e
S u s a n
LakeRileyR iceL akeLakeMinnewashta
LakeAn n
L a keL ucyR i c e M a r shLake
E d e n
P r a i r i e
E x c e l s i o r
G r e e n w o o d
M i n n e t o n k aShorewood
T o n k a
B a y
J a c k s o n
T w p .
S h a k o p e e
C h a s k a
V i c t o r i a
LEG END
Comm unity Parks
Neigh borho od Park s
1 M ile Bu ffer
2 M ile Bu ffer
No n-City Pa rks & Open S pace
Publi c Sch ool
Surround ing M unic ipa l Parks
Wa ter Bod ies
Muni cip al Bou nda ries
2030 Planned Land Use
Med ium/Hi gh Density Resi den tial
Low De nsity Residential
Large Lot Residential
No n-Residential Lan d Use
Lake Minn ewashta P ark, a re giona l
park, ser ves as a co mmu nity park
fo r the surrounding area an d
re du ces the s erv ice area ga p
in the north west
°0 0.5 10.25
Mil es
Figure 3-11. Community Park Access
3-28 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
Facilities
Chanhassen currently provides a diverse, well-distributed range of park and
recreation facilities.
Picnic shelters and/or playgrounds are present in all but one of the City’s
neighborhood parks. A Neighborhood Park Picnic Shelter Initiative is currently
underway that will add 6 more shelters between the years 2017 and 2018
throughout the City. The amount of playgrounds in Chanhassen is consistent
with that of surrounding communities, and is within an acceptable range for
anticipated population growth. A major desire of the community identified in the
engagement process was for the inclusion of natural playscapes, play areas
either made with natural materials or made to look like nature. The incorporation
of natural playscapes can be addressed through replacements, upgrades, and
when new construction occurs. For efficiency reasons, new playgrounds should
continue to be placed carefully to ensure a 1/4 to 1/2 mile gap is maintained
between like facilities.
Lake Ann Park
Lake Susan
Park
Bandimere
Park
City Center
Park
Chanhassen
Recreation Center
South Lotus
Lake Park
Kerber Pond Park
Power Hill Park
Riley Ridge Park
North Lotus
Lake Park
Meadow
Green Park
Herman Field
Park
Pheasa nt Hill
Park
Sunset Ridge
Park
Stone Creek
Park
Pioneer
Pass Park
Roundhouse Park
Curry Farms
Park
Chanhasse n
Hills Park
Carver Beach
Park
Cathcart Park
(Owned by the
City of Shorewood)
Sugarbush Park
Prairie Knoll
Park
Rice Marsh
Lake Pa rk
Bandimere
Heights Park
Greenwood
Shores Park
Carv er Beach
Playground
Minnewashta
Heights Park
Chanhassen
Estates Park
Chanhassen High School
(Joint Fa cilities)
Mancheste r Park
(To Be Completed
in 2018)
Mi n ne w ash t a
Re gi on al P ark
Un i vers i ty of M i nn esota
La n d s c a pe A rb o ret um
Ra guet Wi ldlife
Ma n a g e m en t A r ea
Priv a tel y Ow n e d
Pu blic G o lf Course
MN Va l le y National
Wild li fe Ref ug e
Olson Com munity
Garden
Minnetonka M iddle
School West
L
o
t
usL
a
k
eL a k e
S u s a n
LakeRileyR iceL akeLakeMinnewashta
LakeA n n
L a keL ucyR i c e M arshLake
¬«101
¬«7
¬«212
¬«5
")140
")53 CenturyBoulevardHazeltineBoulevardBluffCreek
Drive MarketB
o
ul
e
vardW e s t 78thStreet
Lyman Boulevard
Crosstown Boulevard
P leasant View
R
o
a
d
GreatPlainsBoulevardBa
varia
R
o
a
dSmithtownRoad
P i o n e erT railW es tLo n g a c resDriv eVictoriaDrive
Arboretu m Bo ulevard Power
sBoul
evardLake Lucy Road
MinnewashtaParkwayCounty Road 140
L a keDriveE a st
He ronDrive
Engler Boulevard
H un d ertm arkRoadEastGalpinBoulevardAudubonRoadPioneer Trail
82nd Street West
F l y i n g C l o u d D r iv e
Chas k a B o u le v ardLake Drive
Pioneer Trail East
High
w
ay 101ChestnutStreetNorthWest82ndStreet E d e n
P r a i r i e
E x c e l s i o r
G r e e n w o o d
M i n n e t o n k aShorewood
T o n k a
B a y
J a c k s o n
T w p .
S h a k o p e e
C h a s k a
V i c t o r i a
LEGEND
Playground
Shelter*
Permanent Restroom
Open Space
Community Park
Neighborhoo d Park
Preserve
Special Use
Non-City Parks & Open Space
Public School
Surround ing Mu nicipal Parks
Water Bodies
Municipal Boundaries
*There is a Capita l Improve ment
Program in place to install picnic
shelters a t Minnewashta Heights,
Herman F ield, an d South Lotu s Lake
Parks in 2017 an d at Sunset Ridge
and Prairie Knoll Parks in 2018
°0 0.5 10.25
Mile s
Figure 3-12. Playground & Picnic Shelter Distribution
Picnic Shelter at Greenwood Shores Park
Playground Equipment at North Lotus Lake Park
Playground Equipment at Carver Beach Park
another neighborhood
playground in
downtown chanhassen
WHat We HearD
3-29 Existing ConditionsSEPTEMBER 2017
Traditional athletic facilities include diamond fields (baseball, softball) and
rectangular fields (soccer, football, lacrosse). After evaluating current and
projected population figures, the City is in excess of national norms and peer
community comparisons for both the amount and quality of athletic fields.
However, an analysis of field sizes finds that many of the existing diamond and
rectangular fields are not large enough for adult games. Thus, ensuring a mix
of field sizes is an important consideration moving forward. Additionally, the
existing distribution for both athletic facility types primarily serves residents in
the core of the City. Moving forward, the City should explore opportunities to
place facilities to serve areas in the north, west, and south, particularly when
non-city facilities, like schools, or adjacent community facilities can not serve
the needs.
During the community engagement process, residents expressed a desire for
amenities that improve the quality of their playing and viewing experience. This
includes lighting, permanent restrooms, and seating.
Lake Ann Park
Lake Susan
Park
Bandimere
Park
City Center
Park
Chanhassen
Recreation Center
South Lotus
Lake Park
Kerber Pond Park
Power Hill Park
Riley Ridge Park
Nort h Lotus
Lake Park
Meadow
Green Park
Herman Field
Park
Pheas ant Hill
Park
Sunset Ridge
Park
Stone Creek
Park
Pione er
Pass Park
Roundhouse Park
Curry Fa rm s
Park
Chanhass en
Hills Park
Carv er Beach
Park
Cathcart Park
(O wne d by the
City of Shorewood)
Sugarbush Park
Prairie Knoll
Park
Rice Marsh
La ke Park
Bandimere
Heights Park
Greenwood
Shores Park
Carver Bea ch
Playground
Minnewasht a
Heights Park
Chanhassen
Es tates Park
Chanhassen High School
(J oint Facilities)
Manchest er Park
(To Be Com pleted
in 2018)
Mi n new a s h ta
R e gi onal P ark
Uni ver sit y o f M innes ota
Lan d sc a p e A rbo r e tum
Ragu et W ild l ife
Ma nagem e n t Ar e a
Priva tel y O wn e d
Pu blic G o lf Co u rse
MN Va lle y Nati o nal
Wi ld li fe Refug e
Olson Communit y
Garden
Minnetonka Middle
School West
CenturyBoulevardHazeltineBoulevardBluffCreek
Drive
West 78th St reet
Lyman Boulevard ChanhassenRoadCrosstown Boulevard
Pleasant Vi e wRoad
GreatPlain
s
Boulev
a
r
dBa
varia
R
o
a
dSmithtownRoad
P i o n eerTrailW estLo n g a c resDriv eVictoriaDrive
Arboretu m Bo ule var d Powe
r
sBoul
evardKerberBoulevardLake Lucy Road
MinnewashtaParkwayCounty Road 14 0
L akeDriveEast
He ronDrive
Engler Boulevard
Hun d ertm arkRoadEastGalpinBoulevardAudubonRoadPioneer Trail
82nd Street West
F ly in g C lo u d D r iv e
Chas k a B o u le v ardLakeDrive
Pioneer Trail EastChestnutStreetNorthWest82ndStreet
")140
")53
¬«101
¬«7
£¤212
¬«5
")61
¬«101
¬«101
L
o
t
usL
a
k
eL a k e
S u s a n
LakeRileyR iceL akeLakeMinnewashta
LakeA n n
L a keL ucyR i c e M a r shLake
E d e n
P r a i r i e
E x c e l s i o r
G r e e n w o o d
M i n n e t o n k aShorewood
T o n k a
B a y
J a c k s o n
T w p .
S h a k o p e e
C h a s k a
V i c t o r i a
LEGEND
Diamond
Rectangular
Gymnasium
Op en Sp ace
Community Park
Neighborhood Park
Preserve
Special Use
No n-City Parks & Open Space
Public School
Surrounding Municipal Parks
Water Bodies
Muni cipal Bou ndaries °0 0.5 10.25
Miles
Figure 3-13. Traditional Athletic Fields Distribution
Rectangular Fields at Bandimere Park
Diamond Fields at Lake Ann Park
Diamond & Rectangular Fields at North Lotus Lake
Park
the baseball/softball
fields at lake ann
need working bathrooms,
covered dugouts, and
bleachers
WHat We HearD
3-30 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
Informal sport facilities, like tennis, basketball, sand volleyball, pickleball, and
open fields, are well-distributed throughout the community. Compared with peer
communities, Chanhassen contains more than average informal facilities like
tennis and basketball courts. To address the growing pickleball trend, the City
has developed ten dedicated pickleball courts between the Recreation Center
and Roundhouse Park. The Bandimere disc golf course is well-used with
players requesting improvements like concrete tee boxes.
While the amount of aquatic facilities is on par with those of surrounding
communities, it should be noted that all of the facilities are beaches. The
community has expressed a strong desire for additional aquatic facilities like an
outdoor pool, an indoor pool, and splash pads.
The Recreation Center and Senior Center provide year-round, indoor recreation
opportunities. Community input has indicated that the current facilities are
not sufficient. Residents desire a signature recreation facility that provides
indoor facilities like a running/walking track, a larger fitness center, an indoor/
outdoor pool, meeting spaces, family activities, and additional fitness classes.
Additionally, interest was expressed in improving the Senior Center by
Lake Ann Park
Lake Susan
Park
Bandimere
Park
City Center
Park
Chanhassen
Recreation Center
South Lotus
Lake Park
Kerber Pond Park
Power Hill Park
Riley Ridge Park
North Lotus
Lake Park
Meadow
Green Park
Herman Field
Park
Pheasant Hill
Park
Sunset Ridge
Park
Stone Creek
Park
Pione er
Pass Park
Roundhouse Pa rk
Curry Farms
Park
Chanhassen
Hills Park
Carver Beach
Park
Cathcart Park
(O wned by the
City of Shorewood)
Sugarbush Park
Prairie Knoll
Park
Rice Marsh
Lake Park
Bandimere
Heights Park
Greenwood
Shores Park
Carver Beach
Playground
Minnewashta
Heights Park
Chanhassen
Estates Park
Chanhassen High School
(Joint Facilities)
Mancheste r Park
(To Be Completed
in 2018)
Mi n new ash ta
Re gional P ark
Uni ve rsi ty of M i nn eso ta
Landscape A rboret um
Ra gu et Wi ld li fe
Man ag ement A rea
Pr ivate l y O w n ed
Publ ic Go lf Co u rse
MN Va lle y National
Wi ld li fe Ref ug e
Olson Community
Garden
Minnetonka M iddle
School West
L
o
t
usL
a
k
eL a k e
S u s a n
LakeRileyR iceL akeLakeMinnewashta
LakeA n n
L a keL ucyR i c e M a rshLake
¬«101
¬«7
¬«212
¬«5
")140
")53 CenturyBoulevardHazeltineBoulevardBluffCreek
Drive
Wes t 7 8 t h S treet
Lyman Boulevard
Crosstown Boulevard
P leasant View
R
o
a
d
GreatPlainsBoulevardBa
varia
R
o
adSmithtownRoad
P i o n e e rT railW estL o n g a c resDriv eVictoriaDrive
Arboretu m Bo ulevar d Powe
r
sBoul
evardLake Lucy Road
MinnewashtaParkwayCounty Road 140
L ak eDriveE a st
He ronDrive
Engler Boulevard
H un d ertm arkRoadEastAudubonRoadPioneer Trail
82nd Street West
F ly in g C lo u d D r i v e
Chas k a B o u le v ardLake Drive
Pioneer Trail East
High
w
ay 101ChestnutStreetNorthWest82ndStreet E d e n
P r a i r i e
E x c e l s i o r
G r e e n w o o d
M i n n e t o n k aShorewood
T o n k a
B a y
J a c k s o n
T w p .
S h a k o p e e
C h a s k a
V i c t o r i a
LEGEND
Indoor Gym
Ou tdoor Basketball
Op en Field
Pickleball
Sand VB
Tennis
Op en Space
Community Park
Neighborhood Park
Preserve
Special Use
No n-City Parks & Open Space
Public School
Surrounding Municipal Parks
Water Bodies
Municipal Boun daries °0 0.5 10.25
Mile s
Figure 3-14. Informal Summer Facilities Distribution
Pickleball Courts at the Recreation Center
Basketball Court at Sunset Ridge Park
Disc Golf Goal at Bandimere Heights Park
3-31 Existing ConditionsSEPTEMBER 2017
expanding awareness and adding more active recreation offerings, fitness
facilities, and meeting spaces. While facilities of this scale exist within close
proximity to the City (see Figure 3-15), residents express a desire to have these
types of amenities within their community rather than having to travel to an
adjacent community. .
Figure 3-15 also displays that while an indoor skating/hockey rink is not
provided in Chanhassen, there are rinks available in Chaska (2), Victoria (2),
Shakopee (1), Eden Prairie (3), and Minnetonka (4).
A key focus over the next 20 years should be the maintenance and
replacement of aging facilities. Facility replacement should consider whether
the same facility should be replaced or if a different facility should be built to
address gaps in the existing system, needs driven by emerging trends , or a
desire for speciality facilities. Examples might include additional dog parks,
indoor facilities, lacrosse fields, pools or splash pads, etc.Lo
t
u
sLa
k
e
L a k e
S u s a n
LakeRileyRiceLakeLakeMinnewashtaLakeAnn
L a keL ucyR i c e M ar shLake
¬«7
¬«101
¬«5
¬«494
")140
")10
")53
D e e p h a v e n
E d e n
P r a i r i e
E x c e l s i o r
G r e e n w o o d
M i n n e t o n k a
M i n n e t o n k a
B e a c h
M i n n e t r i s t a
M o u n d
O r o n o
S h o r e w o o d
S p r i n g
P a r k
T o n k a
B a y
W a y z a t a
W o o d l a n d
J a c k s o n
T w p .
L o u i s v i l l e
T w p .
S h a k o p e e
D a h l g r e n
T w p .
C a r v e r
C h a s k a
L a k e t o w n
T w p .
V i c t o r i a C h an ha ss en
R e cr ea tio n
C e n t er
Sh ak op ee
Co m m u n i t y
Ce nt e r
So ut hs h or e Co m m u nit y
& S en ior C e n t e r
Ed en Pr a iri e
Co m m u nity
Ce nt e r
Oa k P oi n t
Po ol
M in n et on ka
M id d le
Sc ho ol W e st
Vi c t o ri a
Co m m u n i t y
Ce nt e r
V i ct o ria
Ic e Ar e na
Minn e t on ka
Co mmu ni t y
Ce nt er
M i nn et on ka
Ic e A r e n a
Ed en Pr i a rie
Se ni or
Ce nt er
Ch an ha ss en
Se ni or
Ce nt e r
Ch as k a C om m un it y
Ce nt er &
Th e L o dg e
P i on ee r R id ge
Mi d d le S ch oo l
Sa nd Ven tu r e
Aqu a ti c Pa r k
W ill i s to n
Fi t ne ss C en t er
Pa ge l I ce
Ar en a
Ch as ka
M i dd le
Sc h o ol E as t
LEGEND
Indoor Rink
Pool
Recreation/Senior Center
Chanhassen Parks
4 Mile Buffer
2 Mile Buffer
Surrounding M unicipal Trails
Surrounding M unicipal Parks
Water Bodies
Municip al Boundaries °0 0.8 1.60.4 Mil es
Figure 3-15. Surrounding Community Facility Distribution
creating redundant
systems that are
already available in
surrounding communities
will only create an excess,
therefore underutilized,
inventory
WHat We HearD
FUnDinG
Funding for park and recreation
facilities comes from multiple
sources. Under Minnesota law,
park dedication funds secured from
the subdivision and development
of property may only be used
for new or expanded facilities to
serve growth. Maintenance and
replacement of facilities must be
funded through other sources, such
as a city’s general fund.
3-32 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
Preserves and Open Space
Most residents are happy with the amount of perceived natural open space
throughout the city and many would support additional preservation. Because
the priority thus far has been to protect natural areas in their current state,
access is limited and park preserves are not highly used. While the vistas
created by open space are valued, desire was also expressed for increased
access so users could better experience natural areas. In particular, residents
expressed an interest in acquisition to support the expansion of natural trail
corridors, particularly around Lake Ann and within the Bluff Creek Corridor.
We neeD to have
places for our wildlife
to live - that is one of the
most unique things about
where we live.
WHat We HearD
Sarah McGinn Honorable
3-33 Existing ConditionsSEPTEMBER 2017
Plea sa nt V iew
Pres er ve
Ch anhas sen
Natur e
Pres er ve Ri ce M arsh
Lak e P res er ve
Bl u ff
Cre ek
Prese r v e
Fox W oo ds
Pres er ve
He sse
Far m Pa r k
Pre se r v e
La ke S u san
Pres er ve
Pine Hu rst
Pres er ve
Bl u ff Cr ee k
Pre se r v e
No rt h
Lake R i ley
Pre ser ve
MN Riv er
Blu ff s
Pres er ve
Hi dde n C ree k
Me adows
Pres er ve
Lak e S u s an
Prese r v e No rt h
Pine Hu rst at
Lake H arri so n
Pres er ve
Bluff Cr ee k
He ad wate r s
Pre ser ve
CenturyBoulevardHazeltineBoulevardBluffCreek
Drive
West 78th S t reet
Lyman Boulevard ChanhassenRoadCrosstow n B oulevard
Pleasa nt Vi e wRoad
GreatPlai
n
s
Boulev
a
r
dBa
varia
R
o
a
dSmithtownRoad
P i o n e erT railW estL o n g a c resDriv eVictoriaDrive
Arb oretu m Bo ule va r d Powe
r
s
Boul
evardKerberBoulevardLake Lucy Road
MinnewashtaParkwayCounty Road 140
L ake DriveEast
He ronDrive
Engler Boulevard
H un d ertm arkRoadEastGalpinBoulevardAudubonRoadPi on eer Trail
82nd Street West
F ly in g C lo u d D r iv e
Chas k a B o u le v ardL akeDrive
Pioneer Trail EastChestnutStreetNorthWest82ndStreet
")140
")53
¬«101
¬«7
£¤212
¬«5
")61
¬«101
¬«101
L
o
t
usL
a
k
eL a k e
S u s a n
LakeRileyR iceL akeLakeMinnewashta
LakeAn n
L a keL ucyR i c e M a r shLake
E d e n
P r a i r i e
E x c e l s i o r
G r e e n w o o d
M i n n e t o n k aShorewood
T o n k a
B a y
J a c k s o n
T w p .
S h a k o p e e
C h a s k a
V i c t o r i a
LEG END
Op en Space
Pre se rve
Exis tin g S ide walk
Exis tin g Trail
No n-City Parks & Open Sp ac e
Public Sch ool
Exis tin g Regio nal Trails
Surrounding M unicipal Trai ls
Wa ter Bod ies
Municipal Bou ndaries °0 0.5 10.25
Mil es
Figure 3-16. Preserves, Open Space, & Trails
3-34 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017CenturyBoulevardHazeltineBoulevardBluffCreek
Drive
West 78th S t reet
Lyman Boulevard ChanhassenRoadCross town B oulevard
Pleasa nt Vi e wRoad
GreatPlai
n
s
Boulev
a
r
dBa
varia
R
o
a
dSmithtownRoad
P i o n e erTrailW estL o n g a c resDriv eVictoriaDrive
Arb oretu m B o uleva r d Powe
r
s
Boul
evardKerberBoulevardLake Lucy Road
MinnewashtaParkwayCounty Road 14 0
L ake DriveEast
He ronDrive
Engler Boulevard
H un d ertm arkRoadEastGalpinBoulevardAudubonRoadPi oneer Trail
82nd Street West
F ly in g C lo u d D r iv e
Chas k a B o u le v ardL akeDrive
Pioneer Trail EastChestnutStreetNorthWest82ndStreet
")140
")53
¬«101
¬«7
£¤212
¬«5
")61
¬«101
¬«101
L
o
t
usL
a
k
eL a k e
S u s a n
LakeRileyR iceL akeLakeMinnewashta
LakeA n n
L a keL ucyR i c e M a r s h
L a k e
E d e n
P r a i r i e
E x c e l s i o r
G r e e n w o o d
M i n n e t o n k aShorewood
T o n k a
B a y
J a c k s o n
T w p .
S h a k o p e e
C h a s k a
V i c t o r i a
LEGEN D
""Existing Overpass
##Existing Tra il Head
!!Existing Underpa ss
GIdentified Sa fety C ro ssing Concern
Trail Gap
Existing Sidewalk
Existing Tra il
Op en Space
Commu nity Pa rk
Ne igh borhoo d Park
Prese rve
Spec ial Use
No n-City Park s & Open Space
Publi c School
Existing Regional Trails
Surround ing Mun ici pal Tra ils
Surround ing Mun ici pal Parks
Water Bodi es
Muni cipal Boundarie s °0 0.5 10.25
Mile s
Figure 3-17. City Trail Gaps and Identified Safety Crossing Concerns
3-35 Existing ConditionsSEPTEMBER 2017
Trails
Chanhassen’s 76 miles of trails have been identified as the most popular facility
provided in the community. This city-wide system helps connect neighborhoods
to parks, schools, commercial and civic destinations, and adjacent
communities. The City is committed to providing pedestrians and cyclists with
safe crossings of major roadways. Currently the City has a pedestrian bridge
over Highway 5 as well as more than ten underpasses city-wide. Safe crossings
were a topic discussed throughout the system planning process. Specific
locations where additional crossing improvements are needed are identified in
Figure 3-17.
In addition to safe crossings, trail users requested additional amenities
to improve their trail riding experience. These requests include benches,
wayfinding, and lighting to enhance safety and extend year-round use.
Several regional trails connect Chanhassen to surrounding communities and
destinations, including the Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail to the north and
the Minnesota River Bluffs LRT Regional Trail and the Highway 101 Regional
Trail to the south. Both of the LRT Regional Trail corridors are owned by the
Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority (HCRRA) and are slotted for
future light rail transit use. A cooperative agreement between HCRRA and
Three Rivers Park District allows the corridors to be used for interim recreational
purposes.
Currently there are natural surface trails in Fox Woods Preserve, Carver Beach
Park, Lake Ann Park, Carver Pond Park, and Stone Creek Park. Community
members expressed a desire for additional natural surface trails, particularly as
a way to further explore natural areas, whether in preserves or parks.
North Lotus Lake Park Trail
Trail crossing on Powers Boulevard
it would be wonderful
to have more trash
cans along the trails!
WHat We HearD
3-36 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
Wood Carving by Chanhassen Woodcarvers
Programming
The City of Chanhassen offers a range of recreation and social programs for
all ages. These currently include: crafts, dance, and sports for preschool aged
children; crafts, sports, self-defence, ski and snowboards, and dance programs
for youth; programs serving individuals with developmental disabilities and their
families; fitness and sports programs for adults; community-wide events that
occur annually; and educational programs, swimming, clubs, field trips, meal
and driving programs for seniors.
According to the online system-wide questionnaire performed in Fall of
2016, community events are the most popular type of programming offered
by the City, as can be seen in Figure 3-6. Annual events hosted by the City
and supported by area businesses and local service clubs include February
Festival, Easter Egg / Candy Hunt, Arbor Day Celebration, July 4th Celebration,
Fire Department Open House, Halloween Party, and Tree Lighting Ceremony.
While these events are well-attended, there continues to be an interest for
additional events throughout the year.
The City has good working relationships with recreation groups and
associations, who do a good job of providing a variety of programs. Improved
amenities that support events, like picnic shelters with amenities to support
food preparation, would help encourage existing and future programming.
The City provides introductory level athletic programming for very young
children (under 6) and team, league athletics (softball) for adults. There is a
desire from some residents that the young athletic programming be improved
in terms of structure and coaching. Additionally, interest has been expressed
for more older youth and adult programming in arts, fitness, and outdoor
education. There is also desire from many residents for the City to provide more
programming, such as aquatics, to meet the needs of those who prefer public
recreation programs.
Management and Operations
There are concerns about deferred maintenance issues, especially in small
neighborhood parks (playgrounds, basketball courts, hockey rinks). Concerns
also existing surrounding the maintenance of natural resources and lake water
quality. Overall, recognition is needed that ongoing investments will be required
to maintain the quality of the existing system into the future.
Fourth of July Parade
Summer Concert Series
Easter Egg/Candy Hunt
4-37 VisionSEPTEMBER 2017
Chapter 4VISIon
4
As the City of Chanhassen develops and changes over the course
of the next 20 years, its Parks and Recreation System must
likewise evolve. New opportunities will present themselves,
as will new challenges. Sustaining a desirable park and
recreation system throughout this evolution will require a shared
community vision and set of guiding principles.
The vision seeks to describe how the community will look,
feel, and function over the next 20 years. The community’s
shared vision identified in the City’s Comprehensive Plan,
“Chanhassen is a Community for Life – Providing
for Today and Planning for Tomorrow,” captures the
community’s intent of being a desirable place to live, work, and
recreate for all ages.
4-38 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
guiding Principles
Shaping the implementation of Chanhassen’s vision specifically in the Parks and
Recreation System is a set of four Guiding Principles. These Principles provide an
over-arching framework that informs the development of specific goals, policies, and
initiatives. They are also a tool for future decision-making, serving as a yardstick to
measure the results of this plan and the appropriateness of future initiatives.
stewardship
Stewardship is one of the hallmarks of Chanhassen’s Parks and Recreation System.
An extensive network of preserves gives residents the opportunity to explore and
learn about Chanhassen’s rich web of natural resources. Greater awareness of
Chanhassen’s prairies, wetlands, lakes, rivers, forests, and wildlife has led to a
greater understanding of the role those resources play in making the community a
great place. Chanhassen’s citizens have embraced their role as stewards of their
city’s natural resources. They understand the need to conserve Chanhassen’s natural
resources so they will continue to enrich future generations, and they advocate
continuing to incorporate sustainability practices such as sustainable design, native
plant diversity, and ecological maintenance into the system’s planning and daily
operations.
connectivity
Connectedness is at the heart of Chanhassen’s Parks and Recreation System. The
system itself is connected; its parks, preserves, and trails knitted together to create a
network of recreation and open spaces that reaches every corner of the community.
This network connects residents, neighborhoods, and destinations to one another,
strengthening the community and enabling all to enjoy safe, easy, and convenient
travel throughout the community and to neighboring cities. Likewise the system’s
facilities and programs not only connect residents to one another, but they also
connect residents to the outdoors and to Chanhassen’s wealth of natural resources.
engagement
Chanhassen’s Parks and Recreation system welcomes residents of all ages and all
abilities, enabling them to lead active, healthy lives in which they engage with the
outdoors, with art and culture, and with one another. Partnerships with private entities,
neighborhood and community organizations, athletic associations, user groups,
businesses, and schools have created a sense of shared ownership and pride across
all segments of the community, leading to active participation in system planning,
operation, and maintenance. The system’s high quality facilities and programs are a
source of community pride that inspire life-long discovery, learning, and socializing.
adaptable
As Chanhassen has evolved, becoming a larger, more economically and culturally
diverse community, its Parks and Recreation System remains adaptable in the
way it responds to new needs and challenges, and dynamic in its ability to deliver
high-quality programs, facilities, and services. Increased partnerships with groups,
organizations, and businesses representing all segments of the community have
resulted in new and diverse sources of funding and an infusion of new ideas, energy
and enthusiasm. These partnerships have increased the system’s versatility, enabling
staff and volunteers to adjust to lifestyle changes, respond to new trends, and
enhance the system’s quality and efficiency.
Chapter 5SySTEM PlAn
5
The system plan recommendations were drafted based on the findings
from the needs assessment, peer community and national standards
analysis, community input, review of the previous Comprehensive Plan,
Advisory Committee discussions, and meetings with City Staff. The
recommendations are organized into goals, policies, and strategies.
Goals are broad statements that describe the desired long-term outcomes
needed for the system’s guiding principles to be achieved. The next level,
policies, are statements that will guide City decision-making to achieve
the goals. Policies are followed by initiatives, which describe the
specific actions or steps that need to be taken.
To support and further clarify the initiatives, maps for parks, facilities,
trails, and preserves have been included that exhibit the distribution of
the Plan’s recommendations. Precedent imagery is present throughout the
System Plan to illustrate the potential appearances of proposed facilities
and amenities.
5-39 System PlanSEPTEMBER 2017
goals & Policies
The System Plan’s goals and policies are high-level statements intended to
guide City decision-making over the next 20 years. The six goals represent the
desired long-term outcomes of Chanhassen’s System Plan, and were prepared
as depictions of how the Parks and Recreation System will function when the
guiding principles are achieved. To guide City decision-makers, the general
characteristics of each goal are described by a series of policies.
In the System Plan hierarchy, goals are the highest level and are numbered 1-6,
while policies are numbered 1.1, 1.2., etc. so it is clear to which goal a specific
policy relates.
Goal 1. Provide a comprehensive system of park, recreation, and open space
facilities to serve active and passive needs.
1.1. Provide a system that includes neighborhood parks, community parks,
preserves, and special use parks based on the standards outlined in
Table 5-1.
1.2. Ensure residents have convenient access to park and recreation
facilities at the neighborhood and community park level by ensuring all
residents are within a ½ mile of a neighborhood park and 2 miles of a
community park.
1.3. Provide a mix of athletic complexes with user amenities to meet the
needs of recreational, league, and tournament play.
1.4. Provide user amenities as appropriate for the type of park
1.4.1. To serve local users walking or biking to their neighborhood
park, provide user amenities like benches, bike racks,
shade trees, trash and recycling receptacles, and seasonal
restrooms.
1.4.2. To serve community and regional users, provide at community
parks amenities like benches, picnic tables, bike racks,
information kiosks, shelters, permanent restrooms, trash and
recycling receptacles, and access to technology.
1.5. Balance the use of park and recreational facilities for local needs with
events, tournaments, gatherings, and programming.
1.6. Support year-round recreation through a mixture of indoor and outdoor
facilities.
1.7. Explore opportunities to expand the number and quality of the
community’s preserves to protect natural areas that are ecologically
sensitive or representative of the City’s natural heritage.
1.8. Provide areas for small and large group community gathering through
the distribution of shelters in neighborhood and community parks.
1.9. Seek opportunities to distribute standalone playgrounds for 2 to 5 year
olds throughout the community.
Bandimere Park athletic fields
Wifi Access in Parks
needs are being met
but more benches on
trails would be nice
WHat We HearD
Please do more
winter gatherings,
the nights are so long here
we need more events to get
people outside
WHat We HearD
5-40 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
neiGHBorHooD Park DesiGn
case study: roundhouse Park
When redeveloping or designing a new
neighborhood park, it is important and
essential to inform and involve the
neighbors of the park. In the summer of
2015, neighbors gathered at Roundhouse
Park with Park Commission members, city
staff, and park designers to discuss how
the park should be improved. The City had
plans to add pickleball and tennis courts,
but wanted the residents input on how
they should be designed and incorporated
into the park. Some of the residents
expressed interest that the basketball
court be kept in the park. The park master
plan was updated to include a new
basketball half court. The neighborhood
meeting was a useful exercise to inform
the residents of the plans and gather input
on how to design the improvements.
Neighborhood Meeting at Roundhouse Park
classification Use service area size (typical)examples
Community Provides facilities serving the community with
programmed, active recreation areas and access
to natural areas. May serve regional visitors,
although not as primary function.
Community wide in strategic,
consolidated locations at a few sites
15 to 100 acres Lake Ann Park,
Bandimere Park
Neighborhood Primary recreation facility to meet the day-to-
day needs of neighborhoods. Provides active
recreation and informal gathering spaces for
families and groups of neighbors. Fields are
sized for practice/youth games.
1/2 mile radius, free of major barriers
such as highways or waterways
<15 acres North Lotus Lake Park,
Pioneer Pass Park
Preserve Areas focused on the provision of natural
environments, passive recreation, and
ecological education.
Community & Regional Draw Centered around
natural resources and
amenities
Fox Woods Preserve,
Bluff Creek Preserve
Special Use Areas primarily serving a single-use activity.Community & Regional Draw Site specific Olson Community
Garden
Table 5-1. City Park Classifications
Grand Opening Promotional Flyer Pickleball Courts
5-41 System PlanSEPTEMBER 2017
2040 reGional trail searcH corriDors
The Metropolitan Council has established
general search corridors for new regional
trails or extensions of existing regional
trails. These corridors were designated
in order to create connections between
regional parks and trails. The map
below displays regional trail search
corridors that intersect with the City
of Chanhassen. While corridors have
been identified, the specific alignment
of the regional trails will still need to be
determined through a planning process
led by the regional park implementing
agency.
L
o
t
usL
a
k
eL a k e
S u s a n
LakeRileyR iceL akeLakeMinnewashta
LakeAn n
L a keL ucy¬«101
¬«7
¬«212
")140
")53 CenturyBoulevardHazeltineBoulevardBluffCreek
Drive
West 78th S t reet
Lyman Boulevard ChanhassenRoadCrosstown B oulevard
Pleas ant Vi e wRo ad
GreatPlain
s
Boulev
a
r
dBa
varia
R
o
a
dSmithtownRoad
P i o n e erTrailW estL o n g a c resDriv eVictoriaDrive
Arboretu m B o ule va r d
PowersBoulevardKerberBoulevardLake Lucy Road
MinnewashtaParkwayCounty Road 14 0
L ake DriveEast
He ronDrive
Engler Boulevard
H un d ertm arkRoadEastGalpinBoulevardAudubonRoadPioneer Trail
82nd Street West
Ma
rk
e
t
BoulevardFlyin g Cloud D r i v e
Chas k a B o u le v ardLake Drive
Pioneer Trail East
Hig
h
w
ay 101ChestnutStreetNorthWest82ndStreetLEGEND
""Ov erpa ss
##Trail Hea d
!!Underpass
Existing , Sid ewalk
Future, Sidewalk
Existing , Trai l
Future, Trail
Open Spa ce
Commu nity Park
Ne igh borhoo d Park
Preserve
Special Use
Non-City Parks & Op en Space
Public Scho ol
Wa ter Bodies
Municipa l Boun darie s
Surround ing Mu nici pal Trails
Surround ing Mu nici pal Parks
Existing Region al Trai ls
Re gio nal Tra il Sea rch Corridor
Re gio nal Tra il - 20 40 System Ad ditio n
2030 Planned Land U se
Medium/Hig h Density Residential
Low De nsity Res iden tial
Large L ot Resi den tial °0 0.5 10.25
Mile s
L
o
t
usL
a
k
eL a k e
S u s a n
LakeRileyR iceL akeLakeMinnewashta
LakeA n n
L a keL ucy¬«101
¬«7
¬«212
")140
")53 CenturyBoulevardHazeltineBoulevardBluffCreek
Drive
West 78th S t reet
Lyman Bou levard ChanhassenRoadCros st own B oulevard
Pleas a nt Vi e wRo ad
GreatPlai
n
s
Boulev
a
r
dBa
varia
R
o
a
dSmithtownRoad
P i o n e erTrailW estL o n g a c resDriv eVictoriaDrive
Arboretu m Bo uleva r d
PowersBoulevardKerberBoulevardLake Lucy Road
MinnewashtaParkwayCoun ty Road 14 0
L ake DriveEast
He ronDrive
Engler Bou levard
H un d ertm arkRoadEastGalpinBoulevardAudubonRoadPi oneer Trail
82nd Street West
Mar
k
e
t
BoulevardFlyin g Cloud D r iv e
Chas k a B o u le v ardLake Drive
Pioneer Trail East
Hig
h
w
ay 101ChestnutStreetNorthWest82ndStreetLEGEND
""Overpass
##Trail Head
!!Un derpass
Existing , Sidewalk
Future, Sid ewalk
Existing , Trai l
Future, Trail
Op en Space
Commu nity Park
Neighborhoo d Park
Pre se rve
Special Use
No n-City Parks & Open Space
Publi c School
Water Bodies
Muni cipal Boun daries
Surround ing Mu nicipal Trails
Surround ing Mu nicipal Parks
Existing Region al Trai ls
Regional Trail Sea rc h Corridor
Regional Trail - 20 40 System Additio n
2030 Planned Land Use
Medium/Hig h Density Residential
Low De nsity Residen tial
Large L ot Re si den tial °0 0.5 10.25
Mile s
Figure 5-1. Regional Search Corridors
5-42 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
DesiGn oF trails anD siDeWalks BetWeen neiGHBorHooDs
Policy 1.2 and Goal 2 outline various
ways to keep the park system connected
with trails and sidewalks. Today the
city of Chanhassen has many trails
and sidewalks that allow pedestrians
and bicyclists to move safely between
parks, schools, commercial areas, and
neighborhoods. As new neighborhoods
are developed or changed, thought
should be given to maintaining strong
trail connections, as well as adding and
improving the connections between parks
and neighborhoods, making convenient
connections, and creating safe road
crossings where needed. Tunnels, like
the Hwy 5 underpass shown below, allow
continuity and safety in movement for
bikers and walkers, young and old. Mid-
block crossings using HAWK signals can
be useful in areas where trails can only be
on one side of a street or a trail crossing
needs to be in a certain area. Stairs and
switchbacks can be used in places where
trail connections are needed in steep
areas.
VacateD/aBanDoneD
riGHt-oF-Way
As a community evolves there are occasions
when existing right-of-way is determined
to be no longer needed, is abandoned, or is
requested to be vacated by adjacent property
owners. Where possible given dedication
conditions or restrictions, consideration
should be given to whether these rights-
of-way could be used for trail, open space
corridor, or park purposes.
Goal 2. Develop and maintain a comprehensive and easily navigable trail and
sidewalk system that connects neighborhoods to park and recreation facilities,
schools, community destinations, and other communities.
2.1. Prioritize the elimination of trail gaps based on safety, connectivity, and
cost.
2.2. Create trails within preserves.
2.3. Improve the trail user experience through improved maintenance,
wayfinding, and amenities (i.e. benches, trash cans, etc.).
2.4. Establish trails and sidewalks as a key transportation network in new
development.
2.5. Explore opportunities to expand the trail and sidewalk system through
neighborhoods to enhance connections to surrounding amenities.
2.6. Prioritize the construction of grade-separated crossings of roads for
trails based on safety, demand, and standard transportation warrants
like traffic volumes.
2.7. Preserve vacated or abandoned right-of-way for trail purposes.
2.8. Collaborate with local and regional agencies on the establishment of
regional trails.
2.9. Partner with surrounding communities to create inter-community trail
connections that enables users to travel to surrounding communities
and regional trails without having to ‘jump’ between different trails and
sidewalks.
Hwy 5 trail underpass Planned neighborhood trail connectionEnhanced trail crossing
Existing park trail
5-43 System PlanSEPTEMBER 2017
Goal 3. Ensure all residents have the opportunity to participate in recreation,
education, culture, and arts activities.
3.1. Strive to offer a diversity of programs at a variety of times to serve all
age groups.
3.2. Explore art, culture, and nature based programming and partnerships
to serve non-athletic community needs.
3.3. Draw residents to parks and recreation facilities by hosting City events
and supporting partners’ events.
3.4. Encourage, partner with, and support existing associations, clubs, and
groups to fill programming gaps that the City cannot fill.
3.5. Expand partnerships with local schools to serve community needs.
Goal 4. Be a leader in environmental sustainability.
4.1. Preserve remaining natural areas as opportunities arise.
4.2. Support park users’ efforts to improve the quality of their environment
by offering recycling, composting, etc.
4.3. Manage the use of pesticides within parks.
4.4. Explore opportunities to convert existing turf areas to native plantings.
4.5. Reduce impacts on lakes, waterways, and groundwater by
incorporating stormwater best practices in park and facility design.
4.6. Use sustainable building practices when developing, expanding or
renovating facilities.
4.7. Improve energy efficiency when renovating or constructing new
facilities.
4.8. Use native trees/shrubs planted in appropriate locations to shade and
shield buildings and facilities to conserve energy.
4.9. Raise public awareness of the the benefits and necesity of natural
resources, the importance of sustainability, and the City’s efforts
through social media, interpretation, and educational programming.
need more variety
and interesting stuff
to do for all ages.
WHat We HearD
i would like to see
a more natural
approach to grounds, grass
and trail maintenance. less
mowing of natural areas
and zero herbicide/pesticide
use.
WHat We HearD
5-44 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
PesticiDes, Parks, anD PeoPle
Lawn space in the public realm has many benefits; it provides a more aesthetically pleasing and softer surface for play and leisure
when compared to hard-packed dirt, it stabilizes dust, absorbs rather than reflects sunlight, and absorbs carbon dioxide. While
these are beneficial, lawns are still monocultures that support fewer species insects, birds, mammals and other organisms that work
together to foster an ecosystem that provides clean air, soil, and water. In addition, the chemicals and energy required to maintain
a turfgrass lawn are high. Over the last 20 years the City of Chanhassen has minimized its use of pesticides, generally only using
them for the specific issues like Emerald Ash Borer. Several adjustments to current practices can result in lower rates of pesticide
applications (including herbicides, insecticides, fungicides, and other substances meant for destroying pests), reduced labor and
energy inputs, reduced human exposure to carcinogens, and increased habitat. Strategies include:
»Integrated Pest Management, or IPM,
addresses pests such as weeds or
insects by utilizing a combination
of biological controls, maintenance
practices, increased tolerance of
smaller infestations, and pesticides
when needed.
»Education about the benefits of
more sustainable alternatives
and appreciating a more natural
appearance of parks.
»Development of low-impact lawns
that include the use of fescue grasses,
buffalo grass, and other broadleaf,
meadow-like components, which
require less water and fertilizer than
bluegrass.
»Conversion of underutilized turfgrass
areas into native tall grass meadows.
»Pesticide-free Maintenance Practices
such as crack sealing, mowing,
propane weed burning, hand weeding,
tillage, and mulching.
»Designing for reduced pesticide use
includes utilizing low maintenance,
spreading groundcovers and shrubs
in landscape beds, mulch in tree wells,
and fewer fence lines.
»Modeling existing Pesticide Free Parks
Programs such as those of Eugene
and Portland, Oregon, and Seattle,
Washington.
Educational signage
Educational signage
Low-maintenance landscaping
Pesticide free park
Low-impact fescue grass lawn
Native prairie plantings
5-45 System PlanSEPTEMBER 2017
artist DesiGneD Parks anD Park amenities
Artistic features can take many forms and range from subtle to spectacular. Art can be incorporated into parks as a mural on a wall,
a unique water fountain, an interpretive sign, a play feature, lights, or a bench. Artist designed amenities entice a park user to notice
and think about how park facilities and amenities are designed and used and to identify parks and playgrounds with special artistic
features. People think, “This is different and cool” or “That’s the park with the big dragonfly.”
Policies 3.2 and 5.2 - 5.4 discuss the inclusion of art and artists in park design. Methods to implement these policies could include
the following:
»Devoting a portion of new construction
projects to public art. See Norman,
Oklahoma’s ‘Norman Forward’ for an
example.
»Using the CPTED Guidelines (Crime
Prevention Through Environmental
Design).
»Involving an ‘interpretive planner’ in
the design of natural and educational
experiences (e.g. ‘Preserve trail’
enhancement with wayfinding and
nature observation)
»Including an artist in the early phases
of park development and design to
explore creative ways to incorporate
art into the design.
»Designing exterior environments to
be flexible for public use in a variety
of ways (artistic, educational, cultural,
performance, etc.).
Musical play featuresNature themed shelter posts and fence Dragonfly play structure
Artistic sidewalk markings Artistic bench
5-46 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
Goal 5. Proactively plan for a high quality, efficient parks and recreation system
that meets community needs.
5.1. Encourage parks to be defining features of neighborhoods through
the placement of parks in a visible location and the establishment of
connecting trails and sidewalks.
5.2. Encourage participation by neighborhoods, community groups, and
local artists in the planning for and development of park and recreation
facilities. Identify locations for unique features or improvements to avoid
a system of “cookie cutter” parks.
5.3. Enhance users’ experiences through well-designed exterior
environments/places that give consideration to how all members of
the public can engage in these spaces in different ways (educational,
cultural, performance, artistic, etc.), how places can be interconnected
throughout the community, and how lighting contributes to inviting
spaces. As part of design process, seek opportunities to use artist-
created park features rather than standard catalog pieces.
5.4. Encourage the use of the park system for performance art, temporary
art installations, and public art.
5.5. Explore opportunities to reconfigure or improve efficiencies within
existing parks to serve identified community needs.
5.6. Continue strong partnership and communication with local
associations, clubs, and other organizations to ensure facilities are
meeting their needs.
5.7. Integrate trails into the planning and design process for public
improvements and land development.
5.8. Design parks and facilities to address active and passive needs while
giving consideration to the environmental context, surrounding land
uses, and future maintenance and operational needs.
5.9. Establish and routinely update a sustainable operations, maintenance
and replacement schedule for all parks and facilities with particular
attention on playgrounds, basketball courts, tennis courts, pickleball
courts, shelters, etc.
5.10. Collaborate with Engineering Department on trail pavement
management program.
5.11. Explore partnership opportunities for capital improvement costs and
life-cycle system costs.
5.12. Maintain current management of fields as demand continues to
increase:
5.12.1. Rotational resting of fields based on a schedule/level of use.
5.12.2. Postponement of use during and after significant rain events.
5.13. Expand the capacity of the athletic facilities through improvements and
efficiencies within existing community parks.
Facilities to celebrate
the arts should be
included. Bandstands, public
art and sculpture.
WHat We HearD
Performance art in parks
eFFicient Park &
recreation systems
Efficient parks and recreations system are
those that successfully meet the needs of
residents and visitors with minimum wasted
effort or expense. An example might be that
neighborhood parks are located in a manner
that optimizes walkability for residents while
minimizing service area overlap.
trail DeVeloPment
PartnersHiPs
The development and maintenance of trails
involves collaboration between the Parks and
Recreation, Engineering, and Public Works
Departments. In addition to design and
construction, the Parks Department plows
the trails. Pavement management (crack
sealing and pavement replacement) for trails,
however, is overseen by the Engineering and
Public Works Departments in coordination
with street construction projects. These
departments are also responsible for making
improvements for at-grade trail crossings. As
this plan’s community engagement process
highlighted the importance of improving
safety at trail crossings, collaboration
between these departments will be important
for the implementation of the system plan.
5-47 System PlanSEPTEMBER 2017
city PartnersHiPs
Partnerships are vital to the development and operations of the parks and recreation system. Individuals, businesses, civic organizations, nonprofits,
and institutions provide valuable time, money, and space to support a variety of initiatives from educational sessions to park clean-up to helping at
community events. Developing and maintaining partnerships will continue to be important as the system plan is implemented.
Current city partners include:
»3rd Lair Skate Park
»AARP
»AmericInn
»Athletics & Extracurricular Activities
»Augustana Emerald Crest
»Baha’i’ Faith
»Berne Scale
»Better Business Bureau
»Beyond the Yellow Ribbon
»Boy Scout Troup #330
»Buy Chanhassen
»Carver County
»Chanhassen American Legion
»Chanhassen Fire Department
»Chanhassen Floral
»Chanhassen Interact Club
»Chanhassen Library
»Chanhassen Lion’s Club
»Chanhassen Villager
»Chapel Hill
»Charter Bank Chanhassen
»Chaska Park & Recreation
»Dugout Club/CAA
»Eastern Carver County Schools (ISD 112)
»Eden Prairie Senior Center
»Edward Jones
»Hazeltine National Golf Club
»KleinBank
»Living Christ Lutheran Church
»MAAA (MN Area on Aging)
»Minnesota Timberwolves
»Minnesota Twins
»Minnetonka Public Schools (ISD 276)
»MN Postcard Club
»New Horizons Academy
»Park Dental
»Pickleball Association of MN
»Pinky Swear Kids Triathlon
»Purple Box Jewelers
»REACH for Resources
»Ridgeview Clinics
»Ridgeview Medical Center
»Rotary Club of Chanhassen
»Scouting Groups
»Senior Advisory Bouard Member
»Sentence to Serve (adults)
»Skyhawks
»SmartLink
»SouthWest Christian High School
»SouthWest Metro Chamber of Commerce
»SouthWest Metro Pickleball Club
»Southwest Publishing
»Southwest Transit
»Sports Unlimited
»Summerwood of Chanhassen
»The Mustard Seed Landscape & Garden
Center
»Twin City Paddle Boards
»University of Minnesota
»Walgreen’s Chanhassen
»Work Experience Program
Goal 6. Implement strategies to increase the City’s capacity to maintain and
expand the parks and recreation system.
6.1. Identify and expand partnerships with area recreation associations,
clubs and groups; local businesses; private organizations;
neighborhood groups; and other public agencies.
6.2. Utilize our facilities to capitalize on opportunities to generate revenue.
6.3. Evaluate options to expand the use of volunteers to support park
operations and programming.
6.4. Explore seeking voter approval to issue bonds or levy a tax to expand
or support the needs of the park and recreation facilities and system.
6.5. Encourage property owners interested in donating or granting
conservation easements on their land.
6.6. Support the creation of a non-profit parks and recreation foundation.
our hope is that long
term the park areas
continue to be protected.
Having those areas is a huge
plus for living in
chanhassen.
WHat We HearD
5-48 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
keep [area north and
west of lake ann]
free of developers. natural
setting of lake ann is
wonderful!
WHat We HearD
Initiatives
Initiatives are specific actions that are recommended for implementation.
Initiatives are organized by the topic areas of parks, facilities, trails, preserves,
programming, and operations. In this area in particular, care will be needed to
determine what level of detail the system plan should include. For example, the
neighborhood park section could become a list of all the specific improvements
in each park or it could summarize an approach. Our recommendation is to use
the latter method. This would mean that we might have a recommendation that
identifies the need to replace and upgrade playgrounds in neighborhood parks
according to the maintenance and replacement schedule rather than a list of
each park where replacement is prioritized.
1. Parks
Chanhassen’s 30 community and neighborhood parks play an important
role in the City’s quality of life. They act as places for community gatherings,
picnics and celebrations, family outings, and group and individual recreation.
The following park initiatives aim to provide guidance to ensure each park
continues to fulfill its role in the overall system.
1.1. Maintain Lake Ann Park as the premier community park.
1.1.1. Develop a master plan that defines the extent of park expansion
to the west and north to preserve natural areas, extend the
trail around the lake, and provide for additional recreational
amenities like an amphitheater. The master plan should also
explore additional facilities appropriate for a community park
with significant natural amenities, parking expansion, circulation
needs, and expanded natural surface and paved trails. The
master plan should seek to influence adjacent neighborhood
design to promote the extension of park and open space
fingers into the adjacent development areas. The master plan
should also include a natural resources section to guide the
stewardship of the park’s natural resources.
1.1.2. Add user amenities in a phased manner, including permanent
restrooms near the pavilions and athletic facilities, benches, and
electronic scoreboards.
1.2. Implement the recommendations of the Bandimere Park Master Plan,
which includes a picnic shelter with restrooms, field lights, sport court,
hockey warming house, and possible splash pad.
1.3. At Lake Susan Park renovate the existing picnic shelter to include
permanent restrooms, expand parking and add lighting and structured
seating for the baseball field.
1.4. Add permanent restrooms and hockey warming house to City Center
Park.
1.5. Seek opportunities to expand the capacity of the community park
network to serve athletic and community event needs.
1.6. Use maintenance and replacement schedule to plan for phased
replacement of neighborhood park facilities (i.e. playgrounds, sport
courts, shelters, etc.).
1.7. Add parks and/or preserves as development occurs in the Bluff Creek
Golf Course, Bluff Creek Corridor, and County Road 61 Corridor Plan
areas.
HOCKEY RINK
W/ WARMING
HOUSE
SPLASHPAD,
SHELTER/CONCESSION,
PLAYGROUND
RENOVATION
LIGHTED
SOCCER
FIELDS
LIGHTED
PARKING
TENNIS
COURTS
LIGHTED
SOCCER
FIELD
LIGHTED
BALLFIELDS
LIGHTED
PARKING
Amphitheater
Bandimere Park Master Plan
5-49 System PlanSEPTEMBER 2017
Park DeVeloPment
Traditionally, small towns and cities have been organized around a town green, parks, and open spaces. These green spaces
and activity areas give life, energy, and character to their surrounding communities. In many ways, they define the places where
we live. Therefore, the development of parks and open spaces should be carefully considered and not be relegated to leftover
spaces in our communities. Rather, they should play a central role in the organization of our neighborhoods, communities and
cities. The criteria for park development should consider the following:
neighborhood Parks
Neighborhood parks are the basic unit of the park system. They serve the recreational and social focus of the adjoining
neighborhoods and contribute to a distinct neighborhood identity. Neighborhood parks should serve as extensions of the
neighborhood around them, providing recreational and social activities.
Development Design Criteria:
»Prioritize locating the neighborhood
park on local or major local streets.
»Incorporate barriers with landscaping,
fencing or walls when the park is
adjacent to arterial roadways.
»Provide adequate connections by linking
the park to adjacent developments with
trails and sidewalks.
»Design the park for both active and
passive uses and consider the specific
needs of the neighborhood, all age
groups, and all physical abilities.
»Utilize the park to create a “sense
of place” that reflects and enhances
neighborhood identity.
»Use public art, preservation of natural
areas, and other park design to
distinguish parks from one another.
»Incorporate natural features on the site,
such as topography, vegetation and
hydrology.
»Maximize the number of residences
fronting the park.
»Include widened on-street parking area
adjacent to the park.
»Encourage the use of traffic calming
devices next to the park.
community Parks
Community parks are designed to be accessible by multiple neighborhoods and should focus on meeting community-based
recreational needs and on preserving unique landscapes and open spaces. Community parks are generally larger in scale
than neighborhood parks, but smaller than regional parks and are designed for residents who live within a 2 to 3-mile radius.
While community parks may also meet the needs of neighborhoods, they primarily function as “destination” parks with special
facilities such as lighted sports fields, amphitheaters, etc. that serve the entire community.
Development Design Criteria:
»Locate community park on a collector
or higher order roadway.
»Provide a barrier with landscaping,
fencing or walls if located near an
arterial roadway.
»Encourage trail connections to other
parks.
»Position park with streets on all sides or
on three sides with a school, municipal
feature or significant natural feature on
the fourth side.
»Dedicate 65% of park space to active
uses and 35% to passive uses.
»Provide sufficient parking to support
park amenities, but avoid occupying
more than 10% of the site.
»Include widened on-street parking area
adjacent to the park.
»Encourage the use of traffic calming
devices next to the park.
5-50 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
Lake Ann P ark
Lake Susan
Park
Bandimere
Park
City Center
Park
Chanhassen
Recreation Cent er
South Lotus
Lake Par k
Kerber P ond Park
Pow er Hill Pa rk
Riley Ridge P ark
North Lot us
La ke P ark
Meadow
Green Pa rk
Herman Field
Park
Pheas ant Hill
Park
Sunset R idge
Park
Stone C reek
Park
Pione er
Pass Park
Roundhouse Park
Curry Fa rm s
Park
Chanhass en
Hills Park
Carv er Bea ch
Park
Cathc art P ark
(O wne d by t he
City of Shore wood)
Sugarbush Park
Prairie Knoll
Park
Ric e Marsh
La ke Park
Bandimere
Height s Park
Greenwood
Shores P ark
Carv er Bea ch
Playground
Minnewas ht a
Heights Park
Chanhass en
Estate s Pa rk
Chanhass en High School
(J oint Fa cilities)
Manchest er Park
(To Be Com plete d
in 2018)
Mi n ne w a s h t a
R e gi on a l P a r k
U ni v e r s it y o f M in ne s ot a
La n d s c a p e A r bo r e tu m
R a gu e t W ild l if e
Ma na g e m e n t A r e a
Pr iv a t e l y O wn e d
P u bl ic G o lf C o u r s e
MN Va l le y N a t i o na l
Wi ld li f e R ef ug e
Ols on C ommunit y
Garden
Minnet onka Middle
School W est
CenturyBoulevardHazeltineBoulevardBluffCreek
Drive
West 78th S t reet
Lyman Boulevard ChanhassenRoadCros st ow n B oulevard
Pleas ant Vi e wRo ad
GreatPlai
n
s
Boulev
a
r
dBa
varia
R
o
a
dSmithtownRoad
P i o n e erT railW estL o n g a c resDriv eVictoriaDrive
Arb oretu m B o ule va r d Powe
r
s
Boul
evardKerberBoulevardLake Lucy Road
MinnewashtaParkwayCounty Road 14 0
L ake DriveEast
He ronDrive
Engler Boulevard
H un d ertm arkRoadEastGalpinBoulevardAudubonRoadPion ee r Trail
82nd Street West
F ly in g C lo u d D r iv e
Chas k a B o u le v ardLakeDrive
Pioneer Trail EastChestnutStreetNorthWest82ndStreet
")140
")53
¬«101
¬«7
£¤212
¬«5
")61
¬«101
¬«101
L
o
t
usL
a
k
eL a k e
S u s a n
LakeRileyR iceL akeLakeMinnewashta
LakeA n n
L a keL ucyR i c e M a r shLake
E d e n
P r a i r i e
E x c e l s i o r
G r e e n w o o d
M i n n e t o n k aShorewood
T o n k a
B a y
J a c k s o n
T w p .
S h a k o p e e
C h a s k a
V i c t o r i a
LEG END
Op en Space
Comm unity Park
Neigh borho od Park
Preserve
Special Us e
No n-City Pa rks & Open Sp ace
Publi c Sch ool
Surround ing M unic ipa l Parks
Wa ter Bod ies
Muni cip al Bou nda ries °0 0.5 10.25
Mil es
»Develop a master plan to:
»Define the limits of park
expansion to the north and west
»Preserve natural areas
»Complete a loop trail around
Lake Ann
»Identify new facility and user
amenities
Lake ann Park »Expanded parking
»Add permanent restroom
facility
»Lighting and structured
seating for the baseball field
Lake SuSan Park
Add a permanent restroom
facility & hockey warming
house
City Center Park
»Implement existing
master plan
»Construct picnic
shelter with restrooms
»Add field lights
»Build sport court
»Add a splash pad
»Add a hockey
warming house
Bandimere Park
»Seek opportunities to expand the
capacity of the community park
network to serve athletic and
community event needs.
»Use maintenance and
replacement schedule to plan
for phased replacement of
neighborhood park facilities
(i.e. playgrounds, sport courts,
shelters, etc.)
City-wide initiativeS
Add parks and/or preserves as
development occurs in the Bluff
Creek Golf Course, Bluff Creek
Corridor, and County Road 61
Corridor Plan areas
South ChanhaSSen
Priority
Expansion Area
Figure 5-2. Park Initiatives
5-51 System PlanSEPTEMBER 2017
2. Facilities
There are a wide range of facilities currently provided in the Chanhassen
Parks and Recreation System. From traditional diamond fields to a Senior
Center, the City meets many of the needs of its various types of users. The
facility initiatives aim to build on the existing system to better accommodate
current users while potentially attracting new ones.
2.1. Identify and construct a year-round signature recreation facility in the
community that includes indoor, outdoor, and passive spaces.
2.1.1. Complete an aquatic facilities need study.
2.1.2. Complete a facilities study for the Recreation Center to plan for
the renovation and expansion of facilities and services.
2.1.3. Complete a facilities study for the Senior Center to plan for the
renovation and expansion of facilities and services.
2.2. Add a destination splash pad at a community park. Ensure expansion
includes additional parking if needed and user amenities like benches,
restrooms, and changing facilities.
2.3. Develop and implement a phased improvement plan for improvements
to the skate park.
2.4. Support pickleball by adding user amenities like seating, wind screens,
and sun canopies.
2.5. Add permanent concrete tee boxes and improved site amenities to
support users at the Bandimere disc golf course.
2.6. Improve existing volleyball facilities within community parks through
improved seating, nets, and shelters.
2.7. Add community-scale nature play at a community park.
2.8. Add unstructured nature play throughout the community as
appropriate.
2.9. Establish an interpretative center with an outdoor lab space and a
nature based play area to support natural resources outreach and
education.
2.10. Explore opportunities for a second community garden.
2.11. Complete an audit of system ADA accessibility and address issues
identified. Prioritize an examination of accessibility at the Recreation
Center and Senior Center to address concerns regarding handicapped
parking, door access, and trip hazards.
2.12. Pilot facilities for new or trending sports to assess appropriateness for
park system, cost, durability, and demand.
Destination Splash Pad
Interpretive Center
Outdoor Lab Space
adding community
nature play as part an
expansion of lake ann Park
would enhance this park as
an area destination, setting
it apart from surrounding
communities.
WHat We HearD
5-52 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
natUre Play
Nature play evokes a range of images
in people’s heads from total immersion
in a natural environment to playground
structures that are man-made to look like
natural elements. The idea behind nature
play is to get kids in touch with their
natural environment. These playgrounds
are different from standard playgrounds
in that they encourage children to get
dirty, imagine, create, and learn with
nature. Natural play areas are designed
to incorporate natural elements, such
as wood, stone, water, plants, soil, and
sand, that facilitate kids’ interactions with
them in a playful manner. Children can
see how natural materials interact with
each other and themselves, as well as
observe insects and other wildlife in their
natural habitats. Simply allowing and
directing kids to experience their natural
environments in a playful way, rather than
being fearful of the outdoors, promotes
confidence, independence, and ecological
and environmental stewardship.
Natural play using existing natural structures Destination nature playground
Stone, water, sand, and plants in play area
Wood and downed trees as play features
Low-impact nature playground structures
5-53 System PlanSEPTEMBER 2017
This survey was geared toward people who utilize the Recreation Center’s
facilities and programming, regardless of whether or not they are a resident of
Chanhassen. All of the questions specifically pertain to the Recreation Center
rather than the park system as a whole.
RECREATION CENTER
20% neve r 5 % every day 24
%
o
nc
e a week 9% once a month 42% few times a yearHow Often
Respondents
Utilize the Rec
Center
13%
are unaware of ituse private recreation
facilities
18%
are not interested in what
it has to offer
35%
use a recreation center in
another community
18%
Other Popular Responses:
Youth Sports
0%
50% 39%
35%
attended anevent 27%
utilized thetness center 22%
attendedopen gymopenpickleball
participated ina class
26% 16%
9%
hosted or attendeda meetinghosted or attendeda birthday party
Existing Facility & Programming Usage
“I hope it can expand, perhaps by
moving to a new building and
leaving the full building for an
expansion of Bluff Creek.”
“It is a very nice facility. I
exercise there 3 days a week.
The staff is friendly and helpful.”
“The rec center needs to ll the needs
of all community members. Currently,
I feel the programming has a focus on
children and families...”
“We would LOVE to go if you had
swimming lessons in an indoor
pool, and much more creative
classes to choose from (art, clay,
music, theater....)”
“More pickleball courts. As this sport
grows, so should the number of courts.”
“An indoor public pool and
walking track like Chaska Comm.
Center....the private clubs are so
costly!”
“We need an economical
alternative to the expensive and
overly busy Lifetime Fitness.
Doesn't need to be fancy but
something more like a YMCA or
the Chaska Community Center.”
50%
0%20%40%60%80%100%
Of Respondents That
Never Use the
Recreation Center:
Importance of Additional Facilities
& Programming
running/walking track85%15%
kitchen facilities inmeeting rooms69%31%
additional technologyin meeting rooms (screen,projector, etc.)66%34%
senior center56%44%
"health" snack bar54%46%
a seasonal domedmulti-purpose eld house39%61%
more exercise/class studios28%72%
larger tnesscenter20%80%
indoor pool19%81%
Select General Comments
ImportantNot Important
Importance of Additional Facilities &
Programming
0%20%40%60%
50%
80%100%
moreprogramming 73%27%
tn ess classspace 73%27%
large meeting/event room 70%30%
indoor pool 39%61%
tn essequipment 39%61%
kitchen facility 40%60%
indoor track 44%56%
garden 64%36%
hot tub 26%74%
sport court 76%24%
theater 56%44%
café or coffeeshop 44%56%
Important Not Important
While all responses to the Senior Center survey were evaluated, only those from
respondents over the age of 60 were considered for the charts included in this infographic.
However, the comments included below are representative of all participating age groups. 1% never 34%
e
v
e
r
y
d
ay 48% once a week 10% once a monthSENIOR CENTER
Select General Comments 31% never 1 % e very day 33
%
o
nce a week 11% once a month 24% few times a yearHow Often
Respondents
Utilize
the Senior
Center
40%
are unaware of itare not interested in what
it has to offer
24%
use a senior center in
another community
12%
Of Respondents That
Never Use the
Senior Center:
Other Popular Responses:
Women’s Club
Driver’s Safety Class
Chan-O-Laires
0%
60%
51%
42%
eld trip 29%
health orwellness program 4%woodcarving
art or educationclass
27%card playing
Existing Facility & Programming Usage
100%0%20%40%60%80%
Very Supportive Somewhat Supportive Not at All Supportive
Support For Senior Center Alternatives
build a new senior
center adjacent to the
recreation center 35%40%25%
maintain the existing
senior center as it is 43%37%20%
relocate the senior
center to a new, larger
facility 37%48%15%
“I am proud of what
the existing Senior
Center offers in relation
to programming but we
will be out growing the
facility with the shift in
retirees. And we do
have a dynamic and
hard-working director
in Sue!!”
“From what I've seen, there
isn't much offered for Senior
Citizens that still work
full-time. I would like to see
some programs offered
evenings or weekends.”
“As the population ages
Chanhassen needs a
viable senior center. The
one we have is very small
and does not have enough
programs. A theater and
art space are very
important to me.”
“Please keep the bus
trips so we can get to
places we can't drive
to and that have
limited parking.”
“The location of the Chanhassen Sr. Center
appears to be superb! It is easy to locate, access
for pleasure and emergencies if needed. If you
are considering a new community center please
include the senior's space: Chaska's community
center where all ages and all activities can
participate is the ultimate (even church studies,
meetings, etc.)”
This survey was geared toward people who utilize the Recreation Center’s
facilities and programming, regardless of whether or not they are a resident of
Chanhassen. All of the questions specifically pertain to the Recreation Center
rather than the park system as a whole.
RECREATION CENTER
20% neve r 5 % every day 24
%
o
n
c
e a week 9% once a month 42% few times a yearHow Often
Respondents
Utilize the Rec
Center
13%
are unaware of ituse private recreation
facilities
18%
are not interested in what
it has to offer
35%
use a recreation center in
another community
18%
Other Popular Responses:
Youth Sports
0%
50% 39%
35%
attended anevent 27%
utilized thetness center 22%
attendedopen gymopenpickleball
participated ina class
26% 16%
9%
hosted or attendeda meetinghosted or attendeda birthday party
Existing Facility & Programming Usage
“I hope it can expand, perhaps by
moving to a new building and
leaving the full building for an
expansion of Bluff Creek.”
“It is a very nice facility. I
exercise there 3 days a week.
The staff is friendly and helpful.”
“The rec center needs to ll the needs
of all community members. Currently,
I feel the programming has a focus on
children and families...”
“We would LOVE to go if you had
swimming lessons in an indoor
pool, and much more creative
classes to choose from (art, clay,
music, theater....)”
“More pickleball courts. As this sport
grows, so should the number of courts.”
“An indoor public pool and
walking track like Chaska Comm.
Center....the private clubs are so
costly!”
“We need an economical
alternative to the expensive and
overly busy Lifetime Fitness.
Doesn't need to be fancy but
something more like a YMCA or
the Chaska Community Center.”
50%
0%20%40%60%80%100%
Of Respondents That
Never Use the
Recreation Center:
Importance of Additional Facilities
& Programming
running/walking track 85%15%
kitchen facilities inmeeting rooms 69%31%
additional technologyin meeting rooms (screen,projector, etc.)66%34%
senior center 56%44%
"health" snack bar 54%46%
a seasonal domedmulti-purpose e ld house 39%61%
more exercise/class studios 28%72%
larger tn essc enter 20%80%
indoor pool 19%81%
Select General Comments
Important Not Important
Importance of Additional Facilities &
Programming
0%20%40%60%
50%
80%100%
moreprogramming 73%27%
tn ess classspace 73%27%
large meeting/event room 70%30%
indoor pool 39%61%
tn essequipment 39%61%
kitchen facility 40%60%
indoor track 44%56%
garden 64%36%
hot tub 26%74%
sport court 76%24%
theater 56%44%
café or coffeeshop 44%56%
Important Not Important
While all responses to the Senior Center survey were evaluated, only those from
respondents over the age of 60 were considered for the charts included in this infographic.
However, the comments included below are representative of all participating age groups. 1% never 34%
e
v
e
r
y
d
ay
48% once a week 10% once a monthSENIOR CENTER
Select General Comments 31% never 1 % e very day 33
%
o
n
ce a week 11% once a month 24% few times a yearHow Often
Respondents
Utilize
the Senior
Center
40%
are unaware of it are not interested in what
it has to offer
24%
use a senior center in
another community
12%
Of Respondents That
Never Use the
Senior Center:
Other Popular Responses:
Women’s Club
Driver’s Safety Class
Chan-O-Laires
0%
60%
51%
42%
eld trip 29%
health orwellness program 4%woodcarving
art or educationclass
27%card playing
Existing Facility & Programming Usage
100%0%20%40%60%80%
Very Supportive Somewhat Supportive Not at All Supportive
Support For Senior Center Alternatives
build a new senior
center adjacent to the
recreation center 35%40%25%
maintain the existing
senior center as it is 43%37%20%
relocate the senior
center to a new, larger
facility 37%48%15%
“I am proud of what
the existing Senior
Center offers in relation
to programming but we
will be out growing the
facility with the shift in
retirees. And we do
have a dynamic and
hard-working director
in Sue!!”
“From what I've seen, there
isn't much offered for Senior
Citizens that still work
full-time. I would like to see
some programs offered
evenings or weekends.”
“As the population ages
Chanhassen needs a
viable senior center. The
one we have is very small
and does not have enough
programs. A theater and
art space are very
important to me.”
“Please keep the bus
trips so we can get to
places we can't drive
to and that have
limited parking.”
“The location of the Chanhassen Sr. Center
appears to be superb! It is easy to locate, access
for pleasure and emergencies if needed. If you
are considering a new community center please
include the senior's space: Chaska's community
center where all ages and all activities can
participate is the ultimate (even church studies,
meetings, etc.)”
This survey was geared toward people who utilize the Recreation Center’s
facilities and programming, regardless of whether or not they are a resident of
Chanhassen. All of the questions specifically pertain to the Recreation Center
rather than the park system as a whole.
RECREATION CENTER
20% neve r 5 % every day 24
%
o
nc
e a week 9% once a month 42% few times a yearHow Often
Respondents
Utilize the Rec
Center
13%
are unaware of ituse private recreation
facilities
18%
are not interested in what
it has to offer
35%
use a recreation center in
another community
18%
Other Popular Responses:
Youth Sports
0%
50% 39%
35%
attended anevent 27%
utilized thetness center 22%
attendedopen gymopenpickleball
participated ina class
26% 16%
9%
hosted or attendeda meetinghosted or attendeda birthday party
Existing Facility & Programming Usage
“I hope it can expand, perhaps by
moving to a new building and
leaving the full building for an
expansion of Bluff Creek.”
“It is a very nice facility. I
exercise there 3 days a week.
The staff is friendly and helpful.”
“The rec center needs to ll the needs
of all community members. Currently,
I feel the programming has a focus on
children and families...”
“We would LOVE to go if you had
swimming lessons in an indoor
pool, and much more creative
classes to choose from (art, clay,
music, theater....)”
“More pickleball courts. As this sport
grows, so should the number of courts.”
“An indoor public pool and
walking track like Chaska Comm.
Center....the private clubs are so
costly!”
“We need an economical
alternative to the expensive and
overly busy Lifetime Fitness.
Doesn't need to be fancy but
something more like a YMCA or
the Chaska Community Center.”
50%
0%20%40%60%80%100%
Of Respondents That
Never Use the
Recreation Center:
Importance of Additional Facilities
& Programming
running/walking track 85%15%
kitchen facilities inmeeting rooms 69%31%
additional technologyin meeting rooms (screen,projector, etc.)66%34%
senior center 56%44%
"health" snack bar 54%46%
a seasonal domedmulti-purpose e ld house 39%61%
more exercise/class studios 28%72%
larger tn essc enter 20%80%
indoor pool 19%81%
Select General Comments
Important Not Important
Importance of Additional Facilities &
Programming
0%20%40%60%
50%
80%100%
moreprogramming 73%27%
tn ess classspace 73%27%
large meeting/event room 70%30%
indoor pool 39%61%
tn essequipment 39%61%
kitchen facility 40%60%
indoor track 44%56%
garden 64%36%
hot tub 26%74%
sport court 76%24%
theater 56%44%
café or coffeeshop 44%56%
Important Not Important
While all responses to the Senior Center survey were evaluated, only those from
respondents over the age of 60 were considered for the charts included in this infographic.
However, the comments included below are representative of all participating age groups. 1 % never 34%
ev
e
r
y
d
ay
48% once a week 10% once a monthSENIOR CENTER
Select General Comments 31% never 1 % every day 33
%
o
n
ce a week 11% once a month 24% few times a yearHow Often
Respondents
Utilize
the Senior
Center
40%
are unaware of it are not interested in what
it has to offer
24%
use a senior center inanother community
12%
Of Respondents That
Never Use the
Senior Center:
Other Popular Responses:
Women’s Club
Driver’s Safety Class
Chan-O-Laires
0%
60%
51%
42%
eld trip 29%
health orwellness program 4%woodcarving
art or educationclass
27%card playing
Existing Facility & Programming Usage
100%0%20%40%60%80%
Very Supportive Somewhat Supportive Not at All Supportive
Support For Senior Center Alternatives
build a new senior
center adjacent to the
recreation center 35%40%25%
maintain the existing
senior center as it is 43%37%20%
relocate the senior
center to a new, larger
facility 37%48%15%
“I am proud of what
the existing Senior
Center offers in relation
to programming but we
will be out growing the
facility with the shift in
retirees. And we do
have a dynamic and
hard-working director
in Sue!!”
“From what I've seen, there
isn't much offered for Senior
Citizens that still work
full-time. I would like to see
some programs offered
evenings or weekends.”
“As the population ages
Chanhassen needs a
viable senior center. The
one we have is very small
and does not have enough
programs. A theater and
art space are very
important to me.”
“Please keep the bus
trips so we can get to
places we can't drive
to and that have
limited parking.”
“The location of the Chanhassen Sr. Center
appears to be superb! It is easy to locate, access
for pleasure and emergencies if needed. If you
are considering a new community center please
include the senior's space: Chaska's community
center where all ages and all activities can
participate is the ultimate (even church studies,
meetings, etc.)”
recreation center
senior center
existing Facilities & Programming Use
siGnatUre recreation Facility stUDy
Community input in the Parks and Recreation System planning process identified the need for improvements to the Recreation
Center and Senior Center. A recommended initiative of the System Plan is the development of a facility study for a Signature
Recreation Facility.
Completing a facility study is important
as it will provide:
»A thorough assessment of existing
conditions - including an inventory of
existing facilities, analysis of service
levels, and an assessment of other
public and private resources serving
the community
»The identification of community
needs now and into the future -
including community preferences for
potential amenities and services
»The exploration of a range of options
with an analysis of costs, benefits,
and challenges of each
»An assessment of construction,
operation, and maintenance costs, as
well as the potential economic impact
of the facility
»The exploration of partnership and
funding options
While a detailed examination of the
recreation and senior centers was not
conducted in the system planning
process, outreach as part of the system
planning process did invite discussion
on the future needs of the community
relative to those facilities. The charts
provided on the next page are summaries
of some of the community input
received. These provide a foundation for
a specific facility study to be conducted.
All of the community input received
during the system planning process is
available in Appendix A of the system
plan.
Through the system planning process,
the following amenities and services
were identified as needs that have the
potential to be served by a signature
recreation facility:
»Childcare
»Coffee shop/snack bar
»Community meeting space/banquet
space with kitchen
»Expanded classes and programming
»Field House/Dome
»Fitness Center
»Garden
»Gym space
»Ice rinks (indoor/outdoor)
»Indoor kids play area
»Passive recreation areas
»Pool (indoor/outdoor)
»Running/walking track
»Splash pad
»Sport courts
»Studio for art/hobbies
»Swim lessons/open swim
»Theater
»Waterpark
5-54 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
Importance of Additional Facilities &
Programming
0%20%40%60%
50%
80%100%
moreprogramming 73%27%
tn ess classspace 73%27%
large meeting/event room 70%30%
indoor pool 39%61%
tn essequipment 39%61%
kitchen facility 40%60%
indoor track 44%56%
garden 64%36%
hot tub 26%74%
sport court 76%24%
theater 56%44%
café or coffeeshop 44%56%
Important Not Important
While all responses to the Senior Center survey were evaluated, only those from
respondents over the age of 60 were considered for the charts included in this infographic.
However, the comments included below are representative of all participating age groups. 1% never 34%
e
v
e
r
y
d
ay 48% once a week 10% once a monthSENIOR CENTER
Select General Comments 31% never 1 % every day 33
%
o
nce a week 11% once a month 24% few times a yearHow Often
Respondents
Utilize
the Senior
Center
40%
are unaware of it are not interested in whatit has to offer
24%
use a senior center inanother community
12%
Of Respondents That
Never Use the
Senior Center:
Other Popular Responses:
Women’s Club
Driver’s Safety Class
Chan-O-Laires
0%
60%
51%
42%
eld trip 29%
health orwellness program 4%woodcarving
art or educationclass
27%card playing
Existing Facility & Programming Usage
100%0%20%40%60%80%
Very Supportive Somewhat Supportive Not at All Supportive
Support For Senior Center Alternatives
build a new senior
center adjacent to the
recreation center 35%40%25%
maintain the existing
senior center as it is 43%37%20%
relocate the senior
center to a new, larger
facility 37%48%15%
“I am proud of what
the existing Senior
Center offers in relation
to programming but we
will be out growing the
facility with the shift in
retirees. And we do
have a dynamic and
hard-working director
in Sue!!”
“From what I've seen, there
isn't much offered for Senior
Citizens that still work
full-time. I would like to see
some programs offered
evenings or weekends.”
“As the population ages
Chanhassen needs a
viable senior center. The
one we have is very small
and does not have enough
programs. A theater and
art space are very
important to me.”
“Please keep the bus
trips so we can get to
places we can't drive
to and that have
limited parking.”
“The location of the Chanhassen Sr. Center
appears to be superb! It is easy to locate, access
for pleasure and emergencies if needed. If you
are considering a new community center please
include the senior's space: Chaska's community
center where all ages and all activities can
participate is the ultimate (even church studies,
meetings, etc.)”
This survey was geared toward people who utilize the Recreation Center’s
facilities and programming, regardless of whether or not they are a resident of
Chanhassen. All of the questions specifically pertain to the Recreation Center
rather than the park system as a whole.
RECREATION CENTER
20% never 5 % every day 24
%
o
nc
e a week 9% once a month 42% few times a yearHow Often
Respondents
Utilize the Rec
Center
13%
are unaware of ituse private recreation
facilities
18%
are not interested in what
it has to offer
35%
use a recreation center in
another community
18%
Other Popular Responses:
Youth Sports
0%
50% 39%
35%
attended anevent 27%
utilized thetness center 22%
attendedopen gymopenpickleball
participated ina class
26% 16%
9%
hosted or attendeda meetinghosted or attendeda birthday party
Existing Facility & Programming Usage
“I hope it can expand, perhaps by
moving to a new building and
leaving the full building for an
expansion of Bluff Creek.”
“It is a very nice facility. I
exercise there 3 days a week.
The staff is friendly and helpful.”
“The rec center needs to ll the needs
of all community members. Currently,
I feel the programming has a focus on
children and families...”
“We would LOVE to go if you had
swimming lessons in an indoor
pool, and much more creative
classes to choose from (art, clay,
music, theater....)”
“More pickleball courts. As this sport
grows, so should the number of courts.”
“An indoor public pool and
walking track like Chaska Comm.
Center....the private clubs are so
costly!”
“We need an economical
alternative to the expensive and
overly busy Lifetime Fitness.
Doesn't need to be fancy but
something more like a YMCA or
the Chaska Community Center.”
50%
0%20%40%60%80%100%
Of Respondents That
Never Use the
Recreation Center:
Importance of Additional Facilities
& Programming
running/walking track 85%15%
kitchen facilities inmeeting rooms 69%31%
additional technologyin meeting rooms (screen,projector, etc.)66%34%
senior center 56%44%
"health" snack bar 54%46%
a seasonal domedmulti-purpose e ld house 39%61%
more exercise/class studios 28%72%
larger tn essc enter 20%80%
indoor pool 19%81%
Select General Comments
Important Not Important
importance of additional Facilities & Programming
recreation center senior center
5-55 System PlanSEPTEMBER 2017
Lake Ann Park
Lake Susan
Park
Bandimere
Park
Ci ty Center
Park
Chanhassen
Recreation Cent er
South Lotus
Lake Park
Kerber Pond Park
Power Hill Pa rk
Riley Ridge Park
Nort h Lotus
La ke Park
Meadow
Green Pa rk
Herman Field
Park
Pheas ant Hill
Park
Sunset R idge
Park
Stone Creek
Park
Pione er
Pass Park
Roundhouse Park
Curry Fa rm s
Park
Chanhass en
Hills Park
Carv er Bea ch
Park
Cat hc art P ark
(O wne d by the
City of Shore wood)
Sugarbush Park
Prairie Knoll
Park
Ric e Marsh
La ke P ark
Bandimere
Height s Park
Greenwood
Shores P ark
Carv er Bea ch
Playground
Minnewas ht a
Height s Park
Chanhass en
Es tate s Pa rk
Chanhass en High School
(J oint Fa cilities)
Manchester Park
(To B e Com plete d
in 2018)
Mi n ne w a s h t a
R e gi on a l P a r k
U ni v e r s it y o f M in ne s ot a
La n d s c a p e A r bo r e tu m
R a gu e t W ild l if e
Ma na g e m e n t A r e a
Pr iv a t e l y O wn e d
Pu bl ic G o lf C o u r s e
MN V a l le y N a t i o na l
W i ld li f e R e fug e
Ols on Community
Garden
Minnet onka Middle
School W est
CenturyBoulevardHazeltineBoulevardBluffCreek
Driv
e
West 78th S t reet
Lyman Boulevard ChanhassenRoadCros st o w n B oulevard
Ple asant Vi e wRo ad
GreatPlai
n
s
Boulev
a
r
dBa
varia
R
o
a
dSmithtownRoad
P i o n eerT railW estL o n g a c resDriv eVictoriaDrive
Arboretu m Bo ule va r d Power
s
Boul
evardKerberBoulevardLak e Lucy Road
MinnewashtaParkwayCounty Road 140
L ake DriveEast
He ronDrive
Engler Boulevard
H un d ertm arkRoadEastGalpinBoulevardAudubonRoadPi oneer Trail
82nd Street West
F ly in g C lo u d D r iv e
Chas k a B o u le v ardL akeDrive
Pioneer Trail EastChestnutStreetNorthWest82ndStreet
")140
")53
¬«101
¬«7
£¤212
¬«5
")61
¬«101
¬«101
L
o
t
usL
a
k
eL a k e
S u s a n
LakeRileyR iceL akeLakeMinnewashta
LakeA n n
L a keL ucyR i c e M a r shLake
E d e n
P r a i r i e
E x c e l s i o r
G r e e n w o o d
M i n n e t o n k aShorewood
T o n k a
B a y
J a c k s o n
T w p .
S h a k o p e e
C h a s k a
V i c t o r i a
LEGEND
Open Space
Comm unity Park
Ne igh borho od Park
Pre se rve
Special Use
Non-City Parks & Open Sp ace
Public Sch ool
Surrounding M unicipa l Parks
Wa ter Bod ies
Municip al Bou nda ries °0 0.5 10.25
Mil es
»Complete a study to plan for expansion
of facility and services
»Improve accessibility (i.e. handicapped
parking, trip hazards, door access)
reCreation Center
»Complete a study to plan
for expansion of facility
and services
»Improve accessibility (i.e.
handicapped parking, trip
hazards, door access)
Senior Center
Develop and implement
a phased plan for
improvements to the
skate park
Skate Park
Add permanent concrete
tee boxes and improved
site amenities to support
disc golf users
Bandimere Park
»Identify and construct a year-round signature recreation
facility in the community that includes indoor, outdoor, and
passive spaces. Complete an aquatic facilities need study,
recreation center study, and senior center study.
»Add a destination splash pad with parking and user
amenities at a community park.
»Support pickleball by adding user amenities like seating,
wind screens, and sun canopies.
»Improve existing volleyball facilities within community
parks through improved seating, nets, and shelters.
»Add community-scale nature play at a community park.
»Add unstructured nature play throughout the community as
appropriate.
»Establish an interpretative center with an outdoor lab space
and a nature based play area to support natural resources
outreach and education.
»Explore opportunities for a second community garden.
»Complete an audit of system ADA accessibility and address
issues identified. Prioritize Recreation and Senior Centers.
»Pilot facilities for new or trending sports to assess
appropriateness for park system, cost, durability, and
demand.
»Install additional ballfield safety fencing as needed.
»Implement the recommendations of the Athletic Fields
Study.
City-wide initiativeS
Figure 5-3. Facility Initiatives
5-56 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
maintaining current
baseball/softball
fields and possibly adding an
additional complex/fields to
accommodate youth
baseball/softball practices/
games and to better
showcase our community
during hosted tournaments.
WHat We HearD2.13. Install additional ballfield safety fencing as needed.
2.14. Implement the following recommendations of the Athletic Fields Study:
2.14.1. Based on current trends combined with projected demand,
Chanhassen should plan for new multi-purpose field
construction (1-3 fields) in the next 15 years.
2.14.2. Based on national standards and desires of the baseball
community, the City should continue to emphasize flexibility in
the ballfields with basepaths and moveable pitching rubbers or
mounds to better meet the demands for 75’ and 90’ basepath
ballfields.
2.14.3. Provide lights at Bandimere Park on baseball and soccer fields
to expand capacity of fields and improve scheduling flexibility.
2.14.4. Provide a lighted, artificial turf multi-use field at Bandimere Park
to expand capacity, ensure playability, provide a premier field,
and protect and allow for more resting of grass fields.
5-57 System PlanSEPTEMBER 2017
3. Trails
Trails bring the park and recreation system closer to every resident, offering
recreational opportunities and transportation alternatives, particularly for
those who cannot or chose not to drive including low income households,
children, and the elderly. As the most popular amenity in Chanhassen, the
City’s 80 miles of trails already excel at creating accessible connections
between destinations and supporting a healthy and active population. These
trail initiatives aim to support the system’s excellent reputation by addressing
gaps and improving user experiences.
While the Parks and Recreation Department manages Chanhassen’s trail
system, it is important to recognize that the construction and maintenance
of trails are a result of collaboration between Parks and Recreation,
Engineering, and Public Works.
3.1. Address trail gaps identified in Figure 3-17.
3.2. Address trail crossing safety issues identified in Figure 3-17.
3.3. Increase awareness and expanded trail use through maps and trail
wayfinding to help identify loops, distances, and destinations.
3.4. Support trail accessibility through the identification of easily accessible
routes that do not have steep slopes, gaps, or challenging transitions.
3.5. Enhance user experiences and placemaking through the addition
of user amenities that incorporate art and education (i.e. benches,
lighting, garbage cans, kiosks/signage, etc.)
3.6. Complete the connection to the Minnesota River through the
construction of a trail along Bluff Creek Drive or Great Plains Boulevard.
3.7. Expand the number of natural surface trails by mapping existing
locations, identifying opportunities for expansion, including in
preserves, and incorporating trail expansion in the Capital Improvement
Plan.
3.8. Explore opportunities to add trailheads.
3.9. Work with partner agencies to reopen the Minnesota River Bluff LRT
Regional Trail.
3.10. Initiate a single-track mountain bike trail study.
trail markers anD
WayFinDinG
Identification of routes, such as
trail loops or distances, can be
addressed in ways that range from
easily implementable and temporary,
to embedded and permanent. Route
markers should be context sensitive,
reflecting the feel of the surroundings.
mileage markers on
trails, 5k/10k routes
marked. Work with local
schools (earth club) or Boy
scouts to have the youth help
plan routes, post routes/
mileage markers on website.
WHat We HearD
5-58 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
CenturyBoulevardHazeltineBoulevardBluffCreek
Drive
West 78th S treet
Lyman Bou levard ChanhassenRoadCross town B oulevard
Pleas a nt Vi e wRo ad
GreatPlai
n
s
Boulev
a
r
dBa
varia
R
o
a
dSmithtownRoad
P i o n e erTrailW estL o n g a c resDriv eVictoriaDrive
Arb oretu m B o ule var d Power
sBoul
evardKerberBoulevardLake Lucy Road
MinnewashtaParkwayCounty Road 14 0
L ake DriveEast
He ronDrive
Engler Bou levard
H un d ertm arkRoadEastGalpinBoulevardAudubonRoadPi oneer Trail
82nd Street West
F ly in g C lo u d D r iv e
Chas k a B o u le v ardLakeDrive
Pioneer Trail EastChestnutStreetNorthWest82ndStreet
")140
")53
¬«101
¬«7
£¤212
¬«5
")61
¬«101
¬«101
L
o
t
usL
a
k
eL a k e
S u s a n
LakeRileyR iceL akeLakeMinnewashta
LakeAn n
L a keL ucyR i c e M a r s h
L a k e
E d e n
P r a i r i e
E x c e l s i o r
G r e e n w o o d
M i n n e t o n k aShorewood
T o n k a
B a y
J a c k s o n
T w p .
S h a k o p e e
C h a s k a
V i c t o r i a
LEGEN D
""Existing Overpa ss
##Existing Trail Head
!!Existing Und erpa ss
GIden tified Sa fety C rossing Concern
Trail Gap
Existing Sidewal k
Existing Trail
Op en Spa ce
Commu nity Pa rk
Neigh borhoo d Park
Preserve
Special Use
No n-City Pa rks & Open Space
Publi c Scho ol
Existing Region al Trai ls
Surround ing Mun ici pal Tra ils
Surround ing Mun ici pal Parks
Water Bodi es
Muni cipal Boun daries °0 0.5 10.25
Mile s
»Address trail gaps and trail crossing
safety issues.
»Increase awareness and expanded
trail use through maps and trail
wayfinding to help identify loops,
distances, and destinations.
»Support trail accessibility through
the identification of easily accessible
routes that do not have steep slopes,
gaps, or challenging transitions.
»Enhance user experiences through
kiosks/signage at existing trailheads,
benches, lighting, garbage cans, etc.
»Expand the number of natural
surface trails by mapping existing
locations, identifying opportunities,
and incorporating trail expansion in
the Capital Improvement Plan.
»Explore opportunities to add
trailheads.
»Initiate a single-track mountain bike
trail study.
City-wide initiativeS
Complete the connection
to the Minnesota River
through the construction
of a trail along Bluff Creek
Drive or Great Plains
Boulevard
minneSota river
Work with partner
agencies to reopen the
Minnesota River Bluff
LRT Regional Trail
Lrt regionaL traiL
Figure 5-4. Trail Initiatives
5-59 System PlanSEPTEMBER 2017
Plea sa nt V iew
Pres er v e
Cha n has se n
Na tu r e
Pre ser ve Ri c e Ma rsh
Lak e P rese r v e
Bl u ff
Cree k
Pre ser ve
Fo x W oo d s
Pre ser ve
He ss e
Fa r m Pa r k
Pre se r v e
Lake S u san
Pre ser ve
Pin e Hu rs t
Pres er v e
Bl u ff Cr eek
Pre ser ve
No rt h
La ke R ile y
Pres er ve
MN Rive r
Bl u ff s
Prese r v e
Hi dd e n C re ek
Me ad o ws
Prese r v e
La ke S us an
Pres er v e Nort h
Pine Hu rst at
Lak e H arri so n
Pres er ve
Bl u ff Cr e ek
Hea d wa ter s
Prese r v e
CenturyBoulevardHazeltineBoulevardBluffCreek
Driv
e
West 78th S t reet
Lyman Boulevard ChanhassenRoadCros st o w n B oulevard
Ple asant Vi e wRo ad
GreatPlai
n
s
Boulev
a
r
dBa
varia
R
o
a
dSmithtownRoad
P i o n eerT railW estL o n g a c resDriv eVictoriaDrive
Arboretu m Bo ule va r d Power
s
Boul
evardKerberBoulevardLak e Lucy Road
MinnewashtaParkwayCounty Road 140
L ake DriveEast
He ronDrive
Engler Boulevard
H un d ertm arkRoadEastGalpinBoulevardAudubonRoadPi oneer Trail
82nd Street West
F ly in g C lo u d D r iv e
Chas k a B o u le v ardL akeDrive
Pioneer Trail EastChestnutStreetNorthWest82ndStreet
")140
")53
¬«101
¬«7
£¤212
¬«5
")61
¬«101
¬«101
L
o
t
usL
a
k
eL a k e
S u s a n
LakeRileyR iceL akeLakeMinnewashta
LakeA n n
L a keL ucyR i c e M a r shLake
E d e n
P r a i r i e
E x c e l s i o r
G r e e n w o o d
M i n n e t o n k aShorewood
T o n k a
B a y
J a c k s o n
T w p .
S h a k o p e e
C h a s k a
V i c t o r i a
LEGEND
Open Space
Pre se rve
Exis tin g S ide wa lk
Exis tin g Trail
Non-City Parks & Open Sp ace
Public Sch ool
Exis tin g Regio nal Tra ils
Surrounding M unicipa l Trails
Wa ter Bod ies
Municip al Bou nda ries °0 0.5 10.25
Mil es
Collaborate with other
government agencies
in the protection of
Seminary Fen
Seminary Fen
Collaborate with other
government agencies
in the protection of the
Minnesota River Valley
mn river vaLLey
»Expand awareness of preserves
through marketing and wayfinding.
»Encourage expansion of
opportunities for increased
interaction and exploration of
nature (i.e. natural surface trails,
interpretation, programming,
signage, wayfinding, maps, etc.)
»Identify and prioritize the protection
of natural areas that provide
corridors/linkages between parks,
preserves, and other destinations.
»Prioritize the development of
natural resource management
plans.
City-wide initiativeS
Continue to preserve sensitive
lands within the Bluff Creek
Corridor
BLuFF Creek Corridor
Figure 5-5. Preserve Initiatives
5-60 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
4. Preserves
Natural areas have been highlighted as an important amenity for
Chanhassen residents to connect to, interact with, and learn about
conservation and wildlife. While the City contains ample natural resources
and preservation areas, their existence is generally unknown. The following
initiatives aim to expand accessibility and awareness of existing preserves,
while protecting every current and future natural area.
4.1. Expand awareness of preserves through marketing and wayfinding.
4.2. Encourage expansion of opportunities for increased interaction
and exploration of nature (i.e. natural surface trails, interpretation,
programming, signage, wayfinding, maps, etc.)
4.3. Identify and prioritize the protection of natural areas that provide
corridors/linkages between parks, preserves, and other destinations.
4.4. Prioritize the development of natural resource management plans.
4.5. Collaborate with other government agencies in the protection of the
Seminary Fen and the Minnesota River Valley.
4.6. Continue to preserve sensitive lands within the Bluff Creek Corridor.
5. Programming
Users engage in recreational programming for enjoyment, health, skill
development, socialization, enrichment, entertainment, physical fitness,
and relaxation. Chanhassen hosts several popular community events and
successfully partners with local organizations and associations to provide
other programming opportunities. Programming initiatives aim to maintain
existing programs and events, while improving accessibility for all users and
expanding awareness and outreach.
5.1. Continue to host at least five major community events in the city
(currently there is Feb Fest, Easter Egg Hunt, 4th of July, Halloween,
Tree Lighting).
5.2. Continue to partner with area business and organizations to provide
summer concert series.
5.3. Continue to collaborate with schools and other organizations to provide
public recreation activities in the parks.
5.4. Expand the number of informal, indoor and outdoor, seasonal
recreation events.
5.5. Expand nature based events and programs.
5.6. Expand Senior Center awareness through rebranding and a marketing
campaign.
5.7. Collaborate with high school youth leaders to organize quarterly teen
activities (fun runs, music, arts) and pilot programs.
5.8. Collaborate with the Arts Consortium of Carver County to support the
expansion of arts related programming in the City.
5.9. Establish an Event Management Plan to address the registration and
notification process; cost recovery; and strategies to minimize general
park user impacts associated with non-City sponsored events seeking
to utilize Chanhassen’s parks or trails.
5.10. Annually evaluate that the City’s pricing structure reflects the benefits of
the program or event to the community versus the individual.
Greater variety of
community events
throughout year. Want to
attract folks from region to
more than 4th of July.
WHat We HearD
Fourth of July Carnival
BlUFF creek corriDor
The Bluff Creek Corridor is a small
tributary of the Lower Minnesota River,
and is a treasured natural amenity
in the City of Chanhassen. A 2007
inventory of Bluff Creek indicated that
stormwater runoff and groundwater
seepage occurring as a result of urban
development is resulting in excessive
ravine erosion and sediment buildup
within the stream. Bluff Creek is now
within a zoning overlay district that
prevents development within the
primary zone of the corridor and limits
development types in surrounding areas.
While some of the corridor is already
within park preserves (as seen in Figure
3-16), the City should capitalize on
any future opportunities to expand this
protection.
5-61 System PlanSEPTEMBER 2017
6. Operations
As the City of Chanhassen is almost completely built out, there is limited
land left for the development of new parks and open space. As a result,
maintenance of the high-quality system is an essential component of
meeting the needs of current and future users. The following initiatives for
Chanhassen focus on improving operational efficiencies and capabilities,
maintenance, sustainability, communications, and programming evaluation.
6.1. Ensure the System Plan is used as a basis for the annual budgeting
and capital improvement planning process to evaluate and address the
parks and recreation system needs, including staffing, program/event
expansion, facility expansion, maintenance, and replacement.
6.2. Communicate benefits of parks and recreation system, including
the impact of the preserves and races/tournaments on the business
community.
6.3. Incorporate stormwater best practices, such as rain gardens, bio-
swales, and permeable pavers, in park and facility design.
6.4. Reduce impervious surfaces and explore turf conversion to native
plantings in the design of parks and facilities.
6.5. Preserve natural buffers and setbacks around wetlands, rivers, ponds,
reservoirs, and lakes on appropriate public lands and parks.
6.6. Improve water conservation and energy efficiency of facilities when
renovating or constructing new.
6.7. Annually assess trail maintenance policies for debris removal and
winter plowing. Reevaluate and amend winter plowing plans based on
factors like historical maintenance, commuting routes, safe routes to
school, and resident requests.
6.8. Establish a formal process for program and event development and
evaluation and trend analysis.
6.9. Create a tobacco use policy for the parks and recreation system.
6.10. Incorporate innovative sustainable design and maintenance practices
to make Chanhassen a model and educational resource for residents
and surrounding communities.
Tobacco-free park signage
Vegetative buffer surrounding Lake Susan
no smokinG in all
parks! Better yet,
no toBacco!
WHat We HearD
5-62 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
Chapter 6IMPlEMEnTATIon
6
The Chanhassen Parks and Recreation System Plan will guide decision-making
by the City Council, Park Commission, City Staff, partners, and the public over
the next 20 years. This chapter identifies priority actions and improvements,
associated costs, and potential funding sources to ensure the recommendations
included in this plan become a reality.
As the community grows and changes, new ideas or opportunities may arise
that were not considered during the development of the System Plan. To ensure
efficiency, a project evaluation toolkit is included at the end of this chapter.
6-63 ImplementationSEPTEMBER 2017
Priorities
Priorities are drawn from the recommendations identified in Chapter 5 and
are organized into the four areas of capital improvements, plans/studies,
management, and ongoing initiatives. They reflect community engagement
and provide a to do list for the City. This is not a budget recommendation.
Because each area’s success is important, prioritization across the four areas
were not made. This will allow each area to receive needed attention and
resources.
The ability of the City to achieve these priorities will be a function of staff time
and funding. While some initiatives may require a significant investment of
either time or funding for a one-time improvement, others will involve a minimal
amount of time on an on-going basis. It is also likely that some of the priorities
that are lower on a list may be completed sooner than higher priorities due to
funding or partnership opportunities.
Implementation phasing should be flexible and dependent on regular
project prioritization based on needs, funding availability, and partnership
opportunities. Depending on funding availability, the City may need to explore
the phasing of larger capital improvements, such as Lake Ann Park Expansion.
While not ideal because it is generally more expensive and extends the time
period the park is out of service, phasing does ensure there is funding available
for other capital improvements at the same time.
Total projected costs across all categories are included in the following table.
Table 6-1. Total Initiative Costs
Priority cost (low)cost (High)
Short Term $5,770,000 $12,660,000
Long Term $31,075,000 $63,100,000
Ongoing $500,000 $5,000,000
Trail Gaps $4,943,000 $14,831,000
total $42,288,000 $95,591,000
(Total Without Signature Facility) $17,288,000 $45,591,000
Table 6-2 provides a prioritized list of capital investment initiatives, Table
6-3 provides prioritized plan/study initiatives, Table 6-4 provides prioritized
management initiatives, and Table 6-5 summarizes ongoing initiatives. Costs
provided are planning level estimates that need to be further refined with
detailed planning. All costs are in 2017 dollars and include any professional
services that may be required (i.e. surveyors, architects, etc.).
Historical inVestment
The priorities identified in the Parks
and Recreation System build on
historical investments made by previous
generations. Although there is no exact
accounting of the true dollar value of all
existing park and recreation amenities
in the community, the City’s current
asset management program identifies
over $33,000,000 in park and trail
investments. These investments include
more than $7 million in land acquisition,
$10 million facility improvements, $17
million in trail development, and $2
million in maintenance.
6-64 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
location or area capital investment initiative cost (low)cost (High)
sHort term $5,660,000 $12,415,000
Bandimere Picnic Shelter with restroom $350,000 $750,000
Bandimere Sport Court $250,000 $350,000
City-wide Install additional ballfield safety fencing identified through a ballfield safety study $100,000 $300,000
Community Park Add a destination splash pad at a community park. Ensure expansion includes additional
parking if needed and user amenities like benches, restrooms, and changing facilities. $750,000 $2,500,000
Disc Golf Add permanent concrete tee boxes and improved site amenities to support users at the
Bandimere disc golf course. $60,000 $90,000
Pickleball Support pickleball by adding user amenities like seating, wind screens, and sun canopies. $40,000 $100,000
Trails Work with partner agencies to reopen the Minnesota River Bluff LRT Regional Trail. TBD with partner agencies
Bandimere Field Light for three diamond fields and one rectangular field $750,000 $1,000,000
Bandimere Hockey Warming House $100,000 $250,000
Bandimere Provide a lighted, artificial turf multi-use field at Bandimere Park to expand capacity, ensure
playability, provide a premier field, and protect and allow for more resting of grass fields.$1,000,000 $1,800,000
City Center Add a picnic shelter with permanent restrooms at City Center Park $500,000 $750,000
Community Garden Explore opportunities for a second community garden. $15,000 $50,000
Lake Ann Permanent Restroom by Klingelhutz Memorial Pavilion $250,000 $350,000
Lake Ann Permanent Restroom and Concessions Stand by Athletic Fields $200,000 $500,000
Lake Ann Additional Electronic Scoreboards $40,000 $75,000
Lake Susan Renovate existing picnic shelter and upgrade permanent restrooms $100,000 $250,000
Lake Susan Expand parking $30,000 $100,000
Lake Susan Field Lights $200,000 $300,000
Lake Susan Field Structured Seating $80,000 $300,000
Nature Play Add community scale nature play at a community park $500,000 $1,250,000
Nature Play Add unstructured nature play at four sites throughout the community $30,000 $100,000
Skate Park Develop and implement a phased improvement plan for improvements to the skate park. $50,000 $400,000
Trails Enhance user experiences through kiosks/signage at existing trailheads, benches, lighting,
garbage cans, etc. $250,000 $750,000
Volleyball Improve existing volleyball facilities within community parks through improved seating,
nets, and shelters. $15,000 $100,000
lonG term $31,000,000 $63,000,000
Community Center Identify and construct a year-round signature recreation facility in the community that
includes indoor, outdoor, and passive spaces. $25,000,000 $50,000,000
City-wide Based on current trends combined with projected demand, Chanhassen should plan for
new multi-purpose field construction (1-3 fields) in the next 15 years. $2,000,000 $5,000,000
City-wide Seek opportunities to expand the capacity of the community park network to serve athletic
and community event needs. $1,000,000 $3,000,000
Interpretive Center Establish an interpretive center with an outdoor lab space and a destination nature based
play area to support natural resources outreach and education. $3,000,000 $5,000,000
Lake Ann Park Potential Lake Ann Park Expansion ------
caPital inVestment total $36,660,000 $75,415,000
(Total Without Signature Facility)($11,660,000) ($25,415,000)
Table 6-2. Prioritized Capital Investment Initiatives
6-65 ImplementationSEPTEMBER 2017
Table 6-3. Prioritized Plan/Study Initiatives
location or area Plan/study initiative cost (low)cost (High)
sHort term $110,000 $245,000
Accessibility Complete an audit of system ADA accessibility and address issues identified. $15,000 $40,000
Lake Ann Park Complete master plan $40,000 $80,000
Recreation Center Signature Recreation Facility Studies - community center, senior center, and aquatics
facilities need $30,000 $60,000
Trails Expand the number of natural surface trails by mapping existing locations, identifying
opportunities, and incorporating trail expansion in the Capital Improvement Plan. $10,000 $20,000
Trails Initiate a single-track mountain bike trail study. $10,000 $25,000
Trails Explore opportunities to add trailheads. $5,000 $20,000
lonG term $75,000 $100,000
Preserves Prioritize the development of natural resource management plans. $75,000 $100,000
Plan/stUDy total $185,000 $345,000
location or area management initiative*
sHort term
Operations Establish an Event Management Plan to address the registration and notification process; cost recovery; and strategies to
minimize general park user impacts associated with non-City sponsored events seeking to utilize Chanhassen’s parks or trails.
Operations Consider the creation of a tobacco use policy for the parks and recreation system.
Preserves Expand awareness of preserves through marketing and wayfinding.
Programming Collaborate with the Arts Consortium of Carver County to support the expansion of arts related programming in the City.
Senior Center Expand Senior Center awareness through rebranding and a marketing campaign.
Trails Increase awareness and expanded trail use through maps and trail wayfinding to help identify loops, distances, and
destinations.
Trails Support trail accessibility through the identification of easily accessible routes that do not have steep slopes, gaps, or
challenging transitions.
Operations Communicate benefits of parks and recreation system, including the impact of the preserves and races/tournaments on the
business community.
Preserves Encourage expansion of opportunities for increased interaction and exploration of nature (i.e. natural surface trails,
interpretation, programming, signage, wayfinding, maps, etc.)
lonG term
Operations Reduce impervious surfaces and explore turf conversion to native plantings in the design of parks and facilities.
Operations Incorporate innovative sustainable design and maintenance practices to make Chanhassen a model to residents and
surrounding communities.
Programming Expand the number of informal, indoor and outdoor, seasonal recreation events.
Programming Expand nature based events and programs.
Programming Collaborate with high school youth leaders to organize quarterly teen activities (fun runs, music, arts) and pilot programs.
*All Management Initiatives will require a consultant or increased staffing to complete
Table 6-4. Prioritized Management Initiatives
6-66 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
initiative type location or area initiative notes
Capital Investment City-wide
Use maintenance and replacement schedule to plan for phased
replacement of neighborhood park facilities (i.e. playgrounds, sport
courts, shelters, etc.).
Cost to be determined
with maintenance and
replacement database
currently under
development
Capital Investment City-wide
Add parks and/or preserves as development occurs in the Bluff Creek
Golf Course, Bluff Creek Corridor, and County Road 61 Corridor Plan
areas.
Cost ranges from $500,000
to $5,000,000
Capital Investment City-wide Pilot facilities for new or trending sports to assess appropriateness for
park system, cost, durability, and demand.
Management City-wide
Based on national standards and desires of the baseball community,
the City should continue to emphasize flexibility in the ballfields with
basepaths and moveable pitching rubbers or mounds to better meet the
demands for 75’ and 90’ basepath ballfields.
Management Operations Annually evaluate that the City’s pricing structure reflects the benefits of
the program or event to the community versus the individual.
Management Operations
Ensure the System Plan is used as a basis for the annual budgeting
and capital improvement planning process to evaluate and address the
parks and recreation system needs, including staffing, program/event
expansion, facility expansion, maintenance, and replacement.
Management Operations Incorporate stormwater best practices, such as rain gardens, bio-swales,
and permeable pavers, in park and facility design.
Management Operations Preserve natural buffers and setbacks around wetlands, rivers, ponds,
reservoirs, and lakes on appropriate public lands and parks.
Management Operations Improve water conservation and energy efficiency of facilities when
renovating or constructing new.
Management Operations
Annually assess trail maintenance policies for debris removal and winter
plowing. Reevaluate and amend winter plowing plans based on factors
like historical maintenance, commuting routes, safe routes to school, and
resident requests.
Management Operations Establish a formal process for program and event development and
evaluation and trend analysis.
Management Preserves Identify and prioritize the protection of natural areas that provide
corridors/linkages between parks, preserves, and other destinations.
Management Preserves Collaborate with other government agencies in the protection of the
Seminary Fen and the Minnesota River Valley.
Management Preserves Continue to preserve sensitive lands within the Bluff Creek Corridor.
Management Programming
Continue to host at least five major community events in the city
(currently there is Feb Fest, Easter Egg Hunt, 4th of July, Halloween, Tree
Lighting).
Management Programming Continue to partner with area business and organizations to provide
summer concert series.
Management Programming Continue to collaborate with schools and other organizations to provide
public recreation activities in the parks.
Table 6-5. Ongoing Initiatives
6-67 ImplementationSEPTEMBER 2017
trail Gap name
trail Distance (miles)year Planned responsibility surface type
cost (low) assumes $40/linear ft.
cost (High) assumes $120/linear ft.
sHort term $1,101,000 $3,301,000
Arboretum 1.56 2019 City/County/Arb Paved $329,000 $988,000
Bluff Creek Dr. - Hwy 212 to Flying Cloud Dr.0.98 2019 County Paved $207,000 $620,000
Hwy 5 - Hazeltine Blvd. to Century Blvd.0.32 2019 City/County/Arb Paved $67,000 $202,000
Hwy 41 Trail - Hwy 5 to W 78th Street 0.25 City Paved $50,000 $148,000
Chanhassen Hills Park 0.09 City Paved $19,000 $56,000
Galpin Blvd. - to Shorewood 0.11 Multi-Agency Paved $22,000 $67,000
Powers Blvd. - to Shorewood 0.07 Multi-Agency Paved $14,000 $42,000
Great Plains Blvd. - Pioneer Trail to Flying
Cloud 1.15 Multi-Agency Paved $243,000 $729,000
Hwy 7 - Lake Minnetonka LRT to Minnewashta
Pkwy 0.71 Multi-Agency Paved $150,000 $449,000
lonG term $1,651,000 $4,952,000
Camp Tanadoona 0.26 Multi-Agency Paved or
Natural Surface $55,000 $165,000
Chanhassen Nature Preserve (Central)0.27 City
Natural
Surface/
Boardwalk
$56,000 $169,000
Dogwood Rd.0.69 City Paved $147,000 $440,000
Hwy 212 - Powers Blvd. to Lyman Blvd.0.97 City Paved $205,000 $614,000
Hwy 7 - Washta Bay Rd. to Hazeltine Blvd.0.77 Multi-Agency Paved $163,000 $490,000
Tanadoona Dr.0.65 City Paved $137,000 $411,000
Twin Cities and Western Trail Corridor 4.20 Multi-Agency Paved or
Aggregate $888,000 $2,663,000
comBine WitH FUtUre roaD ProJect $1,223,000 $3,671,000
82nd Street 1.31 Multi-Agency Paved $276,000 $829,000
Audubon Rd. to Bluff Creek 0.37 City/Developer Paved $78,000 $233,000
Cathcart Park 0.33 City Paved $70,000 $209,000
Hwy 41 - South of Hwy 5 to Chaska 0.54 Multi-Agency Paved $114,000 $341,000
Lake Susan Dr.0.49 City New Sidewalk $104,000 $313,000
Lake Susan Preserve to Chanhassen Hills Park 0.18 City New Sidewalk $38,000 $114,000
Pioneer Trail - Powers Blvd. to Great Plains
Blvd.0.77 Multi-Agency Paved $162,000 $487,000
Pleasantview Road 1.34 City Paved $282,000 $847,000
Tecumseh Ln.0.47 City New Sidewalk $99,000 $298,000
Table 6-6. Trail Gap Priorities
6-68 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
trail Gap name
trail Distance (miles)year Planned responsibility surface type
cost (low) assumes $40/linear ft.
cost (High) assumes $120/linear ft.
constrUct WitH DeVeloPment $968,000 $2,907,000
Bluff Creek Blvd. to Powers Blvd. (North side)0.51 City/Developer Paved $108,000 $324,000
Bluff Creek Blvd. to Powers Blvd. (South side)0.50 City/Developer Paved $105,000 $316,000
Chanhassen Nature Preserve (West)0.17 City/Developer Paved $35,000 $105,000
Fox Woods Preserve to Bandimere Park 0.55 City/Developer Paved $117,000 $351,000
Galpin Blvd. to Lake Lucy/Lake Ann 0.69 Paved $146,000 $438,000
Hwy 212 Bridge Trail 0.18 City/Developer Paved $37,000 $112,000
Lake Ann Loop 1.23 City/Developer Paved $259,000 $777,000
Lake Lucy Loop 0.40 City/Developer Paved $85,000 $256,000
Lyman Blvd.0.36 Multi-Agency Paved $76,000 $228,000
trail GaPs total $4,943,000 $14,831,000
trail crossinG saFety
concerns
Several trail crossing safety concerns
were pointed out during the community
engagement process. Those identified
through the process are identified on
the map to the left. Additional areas of
concern may also exist and are annually
reviewed.
Safety for trail crossings are addressed
using a variety of techniques depending
on factors such as right-of-way
availability, traffic volume, visibility, and
grades. Safety for crossings may be
improved through markings, lights, or
grade separated tunnels or bridges.
In addition to collaboration between
the City’s Parks and Recreation
and Engineering Department, trail
safety crossings often involve other
jurisdictions, like the County, as well
as property owners. While trail safety
crossing improvements are not a specific
initiative of the Parks and Recreation
System Plan, supporting others within
the City to address these concerns should
be an ongoing effort. CenturyBoulevardHazeltineBoulevardBluffCreek
Drive
West 78th Street
Lyman Boulevard ChanhassenRoadCrosstown Boulevard
Pleasant Vi e wRoad
GreatPlain
s
Boulev
a
r
dB
a
varia
R
o
adSmithtownRoad
P io n e erT railW estL o n g a c resDriv eVictoriaDrive
Arboretum Bo ulevard Powe
r
s
Boul
evardKerberBoulevardLake Lucy Road
MinnewashtaParkwayCounty Road 140
L ake DriveEast
He ronDrive
Engler Boulevard
Hun d ertm arkRoadEastGalpinBoulevardAudubonRoadPioneer Trail
82nd Street West
F l y i n g C l o u d D r iv e
Chas k a B o u le v ardLakeDrive
Pioneer Trail EastChestnutStreetNorthWest82ndStreet
")140
")53
¬«101
¬«7
£¤212
¬«5
")61
¬«101
¬«101
L
o
t
usL
a
k
eL a k e
S u s a n
LakeRileyR iceL akeLakeMinnewashta
LakeA n n
L a keL ucyR i c e M a r sh
L a k e
E d e n
P r a i r i e
E x c e l s i o r
G r e e n w o o d
M i n n e t o n k aShorewood
T o n k a
B a y
J a c k s o n
T w p .
S h a k o p e e
C h a s k a
V i c t o r i a
LEGEND
""Existing Overpass
##Existing Trail Head
!!Existing Underpass
GIdentified Safety C ro ssing Concern
Trail Gap
Existing Sidewalk
Existing Trail
Open Space
Community Park
Neighborhood Park
Preserve
Special Use
Non-City Parks & Open Space
Public School
Existing Region al Trails
Surrounding Municipal Trails
Surrounding Municipal Parks
Water Bodies
Municipal Boun daries °0 0.5 10.25 Mile s
a
B
c
DG
Hi
J k
l
m
n
o
P
e F
6-69 ImplementationSEPTEMBER 2017
Maintenance and replacement
The Parks and Recreation System Planning process included the development
of a framework for the creation of a maintenance and replacement
schedule that would identify timeframes and estimated costs for major park
infrastructure, including playgrounds, hard surface courts, shelters, etc. This
schedule does not include ongoing maintenance costs like mowing, plowing,
or trash removal. The maintenance and replacement schedule is intended to
assist in long-term budgeting for ongoing, non-capital costs, as well as the
selection of projects for the annual capital improvement program.
The mainteance and replacement schedule is an ongoing endeavor that will be
updated as new investments are made or aging structures are removed. While
major system components have been identified, Staff continues to add detail
on park infrastructure like fencing, retaining walls, etc.
The maintenance and replacement schedule developed to date indicates that
the Parks and Recreation System requires an investment of approximately
$ 350,000 annually. This average was developed by looking at the total
anticipated costs for 2017 to 2040 and calculating a yearly average. The actual
costs needed for an individual year will vary based on the types of repair,
repalcement, and maintenance needed. For example, some years may have
higher costs due to a larger facility needing replacement or that there are a
number of facilities that are anticipated to need replacement. A summary of the
amount investment needed in specific areas is provided below.
It is estimated that the current Parks
and Recreation System will require
more than $8 million through 2040
for maintenance and replacement.
category Description total cost 2017-2040
Playgrounds Replacement of equipment $2.6 million
Courts Replacement of tennis, basketball, volleyball, and
pickleball courts and resurfacing of tennis/pickleball
courts every 9 years
$1.5 million
Shelters Replacement of park shelters on a 35 to 40 year
schedule
$ 250,000
Fields Annual maintenance including fertilization $ 1.0 million
Fences/Walls Replacement on a 30 year schedule $2.1 million
Miscellaneous Replacement of Docks, Dugouts, Disc Golf, Skate
Park, Irrigation Systems, Lighting and annual
maintenance of lighting, hockey rinks, and irrigation
systems
$ 640,000
Total $8.1 million
Table 6-7. Maintenance and Replacement Costs 2017-2040
6-70 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
Funding options
While a parks and recreation system is an essential component of the quality
of life in a community, ensuring sufficient funding can be challenging when
compared to other city services such as water, sewer, and public safety. To
achieve the vision set forth in the Parks and Recreation System Plan, additional
investment will be needed. This investment will not only be needed to support
system expansion, but for the replacement of existing system components. The
following are potential options the City could explore to expand and diversify
funding for parks and recreation:
»Increase Parks and Recreation’s share of the general fund.
»Increase funding from the General Fund for maintenance work.
»Establish a Maintenance and Replacement Fund to cover major capital
repairs and replacements.
»Explore the use of a franchise fee to fund maintenance or specific
programs.
»Explore a bond referendum for a specific package of capital improvements.
»Evaluate the potential value of sponsorship for all assets, programs, and
events in the system based on user demographics and participation/
visitation. Use the data to create an enhanced sponsorship catalog to
target local and regional sponsors and corporate partnerships.
»Continue to strategically pursue grants focused on those whose funding
amounts are sufficient to outweigh administrative requirements.
»Continue to build and enhance partnerships with schools, athletic
associations, nonprofits and others.
»Explore collaboration funding opportunities in areas like public health,
public art, programming, and sustainability.
»Pilot use of a crowdfunding tool for small, targeted project (kickstarter.org,
razoo.com or NRPA Fund Your Park).
PUBlic-PriVate
PartnersHiPs
Public-Private Partnerships are already a
key component of Chanhassen’s System.
The level of partnership is so extensive
that many in the community are not
aware of when the City is providing the
service and when it is a partner. Some
public-private partnerships are relatively
simple, a non-profit holding an event
using park facilities, for example, while
others can be quite complex, such as a
public-private partnership to develop a
regional park or event facility. As public-
private partnerships are developed, the
following should be considered:
»Ensure both entities share the same
vision and definition of success at the
beginning of the project.
»Provide a consistent, fair, and open
review process for the development
of partnerships.
»Assess and align strengths of each
entity (for example, a private vendor
may be more efficient and effective
in providing concessions or renting
equipment).
»Conduct an independent financial
analysis of the viability of the
partnership.
»Negotiate formal agreements that
clearly identify responsibilities,
expectations (type of service, hours,
fees), revenue/expense sharing, etc.
»Make sure partnerships are not
concentrated to only the highest
quality sites, but instead serve a
broad spectrum of the community.
»Identify potential use of volunteers
and assess any potential liability from
their involvement.
»Promote cultural sensitivity and
sustainability in partners.
»Recognize public staff time will be
needed to manage partnership.
The City may find it beneficial to further
formalize its public-private partnership
process. The City of Portland, Oregon
and Montgomery County Parks,
Maryland may be good resources for the
development of policies and procedures.
6-71 ImplementationSEPTEMBER 2017
Funding Sources
Achieving the vision and mission for the parks and recreation system will take
additional funding, not only for big, exciting new facilities like the expansion
of Lake Ann Park or a signature recreational facility, but for also for park
revitalization and maintenance, improvements to accessibility, etc. Significant
investment is needed for Chanhassen to provide the type of parks and
recreation system identified in this System Plan. It is estimated that the priorities
identified will cost from $42.4 million to over $95 million to implement. Additional
initiative implementation, as well as system maintenance and reinvestment
needs, will be significantly more. Table 6-7 Funding Sources highlights the
types of funding sources that may be appropriate for various types of initiatives.
The table is followed by brief descriptions of each of the funding sources.
Priorities General Funds
Park Dedica-tion Grants Partner-ships Donations state aid Funds
Park Bond referen-dum Utility Fee
System Planning (facility study,
park master plan, trail plan, natural
resource plan, ADA accessibility audit,
etc.)
1 k k
Parkland Acquisition 1 1 e k k 1
Maintenance and Replacement 1 k k e k
User Amenities (benches, shade,
restrooms, water fountains,
wayfinding, etc.)
1 k k k e
Park and Facility Development
(signature facility, fields, courts,
playgrounds, etc.)
1 1 e e k 1
Trail Expansion e e e k e 1 e
Natural Resources Management 1 e k k e k
Programming and Events 1 k 1 k
Public Art Initiatives k e 1 k
Accessibility Improvements e k 1 k
Best Funding source likely Funding source Possible Funding source
1 e k
key
Table 6-8. Funding Sources
6-72 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
General Funds
General funds can and should be used to develop and maintain the parks and
recreation system. General funds are the primary funding source for on-going
maintenance, operations, and amenities. Most grants also have a matching
requirement, which is often fulfilled with general funds.
Dedicated tax levy
A city can hold a referendum for a dedicated tax levy with proceeds directed
specifically for parks and recreation. This levy can be used for capital projects
as well as operations and maintenance. The proceeds may be in place of
general funds or be supplemented by general funds. The advantage of a
dedicated tax levy is that parks and recreation receives a more stable source
of funding and does not have to compete with other city priorities for funding on
an annual basis.
Bonding
General Obligation Bonds and Revenue Bonds provide another source of
implementation funding for new public facilities, as well as repairs and/or
upgrades to existing facilities.
General Park Bond issue
Residents can decide to raise revenue through a permanent or temporary
tax increase dedicated for specific purposes such as park, trail, and bikeway
improvements and maintenance. These funds are usually provided through
bonds approved as part of a voter referendum.
state aid Funds
State aid funds are available for pedestrian and bicycle improvements on
state aid streets. This funding source is particularly useful at the time of street
construction or re-construction.
Park and trail Dedication
Minnesota Statutes allow local governments to require dedication of land or
cash in-lieu of land for parks and trails from new subdivisions. The dedication
must be reasonable and rationally related to the recreation demand created
by the development. Cities can also require dedication of right-of-way or
easements for sidewalks or trails.
Chanhassen has a park dedication ordinance that recognizes the impacts
that increased residents and employees have on the parks and recreation
system. It seeks to ensure that areas are preserved for future parks and trails.
It establishes a cash in-lieu of land fees where the dedication of land is not
feasible or practical or will not create a site useable for park purposes. Fees
collected are deposited into the City’s park and recreation development
fund or its multipurpose trail fund and are used for the development of new
or expanded facilities. Park dedication may not be used for maintenance or
replacement of existing facilities. The City has and will continue to update its
park dedication ordinance from time to time to reflect changes to Minnesota
Statutes.
6-73 ImplementationSEPTEMBER 2017
Utility/Franchise Fees
Franchise fees are included on the monthly bill that customers receive from a
utility, such as natural gas, electricity or cable. The fee can be a flat amount
each month or a percentage of the monthly bill. A franchise fee can be
implemented with an ordinance, which must be approved by the City Council.
About 4% of communities participating in HKGi’s 2015 Park Finance and
Dedication Survey use utility fees as a source of financing related to parks.
school Districts
The City partners with Eastern Carver County Schools and Minnetonka Schools
in a variety of ways, including the use of athletic facilities and for programming.
The City has agreements with Eastern Carver County Schools for joint use of
facilities at Chanhassen Elementary, Bluff Creek Elementary, and Chanhassen
High School. Open communication between the City and the school districts
are important for continued collaboration. Communication should occur on at
least an annual basis about planned projects and additional opportunities to
jointly manage public facilities and provide programming.
Partnerships
Public and private partnerships have been key to the development of the
parks and recreation system. These relationships have led to the development
of parks, operation of athletic facilities, development and implementation of
community programming and events, and natural resource management.
Partnerships will continue to be important for both facilities and programming.
Organizations with partner funding can also provide assistance with design,
outreach and maintenance. Partnerships and relationships with private
businesses can also result in easements and use agreements for trails across
private land.
Donations
Private donations are another potential funding source. These may be financial
donations from individuals or area corporations, or donations of labor from
recreation clubs or use agreements. Programs such as “adopt-a-trail” or
“adopt-a-park” by an organization, business, or individuals have been used in
many communities to help with maintenance tasks and raise awareness.
Grants
Grants are a way to make Chanhassen’s dollars go further. The City has
been successful at securing grant funding and should continue to pursue
opportunities when potential award outweigh the costs for applying or
administrating. Below is a sample of grant opportunities that may be available,
along with websites to visit for more information.
Minnesota DNR
Website: www.dnr.state.mn.us/grants/index.html
The Minnesota DNR is one of the most comprehensive resources when it
comes to state funding for park and trail programs. They offer a variety of grant
programs and technical assistance. Current programs provide assistance for
6-74 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
Minnesota DOT
Website: www.dot.state.mn.us/grants/
A portion of most trail or bikeway improvement projects funded through
Minnesota DOT is from federal dollars. Examples of programs typically funding
trail or sidewalk improvement projects include Safe Routes to School or the
Transportation Alternatives Program managed by the District 6 ATP. Given
the size of these grants the City should begin preparing in advance for future
applications by identifying the type of improvement, the right-of-way needs,
preliminary layout, and cost estimates.
Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment
On Nov. 4 2008, Minnesota voters approved the Clean Water, Land and Legacy
Amendment to the Minnesota State Constitution which increased the general
sales and use tax rate by three-eighths of one percentage point (0.375%)
to 6.875% and dedicated the additional proceeds for the Arts and Cultural
Heritage Fund, the Outdoor Heritage Fund, Clean Water Fund, and Parks and
Trails Fund.
Funding from the Legacy Amendment is administered by a variety of
agencies such as the Department of Natural Resources, Pollution Control
Agency, Department of Health, Historical Society, Minnesota State Arts Board
and regional art councils. A number of new grant programs were created.
Information about grant opportunities can be found on individual state
department and organization websites.
Foundations & Non-Profits
There are foundations and non-profits that are interested in fulfilling their
missions by supporting local projects. There are a number of on-line tools
that can assist with the process of identifying additional foundations that
may provide financial support for park, trail, and bikeway improvements.
The Minnesota Council of Foundations is a great starting point for identifying
foundations. Another good starting point is to consider the businesses within
Chanhassen and identifying those that have a foundation or charitable giving
department. In addition to retailers and manufacturers, be sure to consider
businesses such as the railroad, energy providers and communications
companies.
6-75 ImplementationSEPTEMBER 2017
Park element capital cost annual o&m cost estimated life (years)notes
neW Park DeVeloPment
Neighborhood Park $90,000/Acre $550/Acre 25-50
Community Park No new parks anticipated $550/Acre 25-50
General GroUnDs & lanDscaPinG
Mowed Turf Grass (Irrigated)$60,000/Acre New Sod
$34,000/Acre New Seed $1,000/Acre 15-30 Includes mowing, trimming, fertilizing,
weed control, aerating & overseeding.
Mowed Turf Grass (Non Irrigated)$30,000/Acre New Sod
$2,000/Acre New Seed $800/Acre 15-30
Does not assume hydroseed. Includes
mowing, trimming, fertilizing, weed control,
aerating & overseeding.
Irrigation $25,000/Acre $1,300/Acre 25
Contractual Landscape
Maintenance $6.50 Sq. Ft. ($282,600/Acre)$.25 Sq. Ft. ($9,250/Acre)20
Prairie Restoration $5,000/Acre $300/Acre
Naturalized Shoreline $100/LF $400/Acre
Rain Garden $10/Sq. Ft.$300/Acre Low end - high end could be up to $20/
Sq Ft
Woodland / Slope Restoration $4,000/Acre $400/Acre
Assumes restoration of existing wooded
area. $20,000/Acre if new tree planting
required
Park BUilDinG & sHelters
Buildings with Restrooms $300-$400/Sq. Ft.$11,000/Bldg./Yr.40 Includes all buildings
Picnic Shelters $150-$200/Sq. Ft.$3,800/Bldg./Yr.40 Includes all shelters
trails & sUrFaces
Trails (10 Ft. Wide Asphalt)$50/LF $5,280 Per Mile 30
Parking Lots (Asphalt)$2,500-$3,000/Stall $20-$25 Per Stall 40
Sidewalks (Concrete)$30/Linear foot Assumes 6 foot wide sidewalk
Natural Surface Trails
$30/Linear foot if limestone
ADA or $5/Linear foot if rustic
footpath
$500/Mile -
general Capital, operations, & Maintenance Costs
The following table is a tool the City can use to initially evaluate and budget for
new improvements. Equally important to the initial capital costs for a project are
ongoing operations and maintenance costs. Adequately budgeting operations
and maintenance ensures that facilities fulfill life expectancy and that parks
remain safe and welcoming. All costs are planning level costs in 2017 dollars
and do not necessarily reflect additional costs, such as engineering, design,
construction administration, and staff time.
Table 6-9. General Capital, Operations, & Maintenance Costs
6-76 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
Park element capital cost annual o&m cost estimated life (years)notes
Park amenities
Lighting $15,000 15 Includes 2-3 pedestrian scale light posts
Pickleball Court $25,000 $400/Court 25 Includes paving, fencing, striping, net
Tennis Courts $125,000 $1,000/Court 25
Assumes 12,500 Sq. Ft. Double Court.
Resurfacing includes striping of both
tennis and pickleball cost of $10,000 per
court
Basketball Courts - Half $15,000/Court $600/Court 25 Includes base, paving, hoops, striping
Basketball Courts - Full $25,000/Court $600/Court 25 Includes base, paving, hoops, striping
Combined Basketball/Tennis
Court $35,000/Court $600/Court 25 Includes base, paving, hoops, striping, nets
Sand Volleyball Court $10,000/Court 25 Includes sand and nets
Playground - Small $25,000 $1,000/Site 25 Assumes neighborhood build - includes
equipment only
Playground - Medium $60,000 $1,200/Site 25 Assumes neighborhood build - includes
equipment only
Playground - Large/premium $100,000 $1,500/Site 25 Assumes neighborhood build - includes
equipment only
Nature Play Areas $50,000-$100,000 $1,000/Site 20 Assumes 1 to 2 signature features and
remainder natural materials
Skate Park Equipment $40/Sq. Ft.$3,000/Site 15 Includes equipment only
Outdoor Hockey Rink $80,000-$100,000 $9,000/Rink 20 Full size rink with wooden boards
Community Gardens $10,000-$20,000/Acre $800 Acre -
Off-Leash Dog Park $10,000-$50,000 Acre $800 Acre 15-20
Fishing Pier $25,000 20 Includes 100’ long wood pier with railings
Dock $10,000 20 Includes 40’ long metal dcok
Swimming Beach $15,000 25 Includes grading and sand
Splash Pad $600,000 $5,000 15-20
Amphitheater $800,000 50 Assumes open stage and seating for 200+
Disc Golf Course $25,000 25
Neighborhood Park Amenity
Package $35,000/park Included in general park costs 20
Assumes 1-$25,000 shade structure;
2- $2,000 benches with concrete pad,
2- $2,000 bike racks with concrete pad,
2-$1,000 waste receptacles
Community Park Amenity
Package $55,000/park Included in general park costs 20
Assumes 1-$40,000 shade structure;
4- $2,000 benches with concrete pad,
2- $2,000 bike racks with concrete pad,
3-$1,000 waste receptacles
6-77 ImplementationSEPTEMBER 2017
Project review Process
One of the most challenging things for a parks and recreation department is
knowing when to say “yes” to a potential project and when to say “no.” The
project review process outlined in Figure 6-1 provides a sample outline for
a systematic review of new requests. This type of review ensures that new
projects that are in-line with system-wide goals can be adequately funded,
staffed, and maintained prior to implementation.
To ensure the project review process is as efficient as possible, a project
proposal worksheet (Figure 6-2) has been developed. This worksheet should
be filled out by the organization, association, or individual who is approaching
the City with a project idea. Completed worksheets will allow the City to review
and, if approved, begin implementing the new project more efficiently.
Park element capital cost annual o&m cost estimated life (years)notes
atHletic FielDs
Field Lighting $225,000/field $500/field 30
Fencing $40/Linear foot 20 8 ft black vinyl chainlink fence
Diamond Field - Low maintenance $1,500/acre new seed;
$25000/acre new sod $800/Acre 25 Includes play surface & striping; non-
irrigated, practice field
Diamond Field - Average
maintenance
$1,500/acre new seed;
$25000/acre new sod $2,300/Field 20 Includes play surface & striping; non-
irrigated
Diamond Field - High
maintenance
$27,000/acre new seed and
aglime; $50,000/acre new sod $4,200/Field 15 Includes play surface & striping; irrigated
Irrigation System $50,000/field $500/field 15
Rectangular Field - Practice field,
low maintenance $15,000 25 Includes grass surface, striping
Rectangular Field - Youth size,
average maintenance $25,000 - $65,000 $800 - $4,200/Field 15
Includes grading, grass surface, striping;
cost range based on sod/seed, and
irrigated/non-irrigated field
Rectangular Field - Youth size,
high maintenance $60,000 10 Includes grading, grass surface, irrigation
updates
Rectangular Field - Adult size,
average maintenance
$2,250/field new seed;
$37,500/field new sod $2,000/Field 10 Includes grass surface
Rectangular Field - Adult size,
high maintenance
$30,000/acre new seed;
$65,000/acre new sod $4,200/Field 10 Includes grading, grass surface; irrigated
* Costs are for turf/field/irrigation only, no additional amenities
Note: All costs are planning level estimates in 2017 dollars and do not include costs for engineering, design, and staff
facilitation time.
6-78 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
CounCil ACTion: authorize project
and authorize maintenance and
continued funding
1. iDea eValUation PHase 2. PlanninG PHase
idea Generation
»Idea may come from Parks and Recreation Commission, public, stakeholders, or staff
»Complete project proposal should include: description of project, facilities affected, need,
benefits, costs, funding sources, timeframe, permits needed, availability to the public, and
description of how it meets criteria set forth in decision principle checklist
implementation
»Construction documents
»Construction
»Program delivery
»Method for measuring success is
defined
operation of Facility or Programs & Maintenance
»Facility or program is now serving
the public need
»Reporting provided to Commission
and Council
»Include routine maintenance and
upkeep in budgets and schedules
3. imPlementation PHase
Planning
»Concept refinement
»Preliminary plan
»Final plan
»Program timetable
Program Prioritization
»Project is prioritized based on policy
decisions, public needs, and other
initiatives
Funding Allocation
»Funding for all aspects of the
program/project are approved and
annual operations and maintenance
and staffing costs are addressed
CounCil ACTion: authorize funding
City Council Review
»Review proposal, evaluating if the idea has merit, how it relates to guiding principles and
policies, and broad-based fiscal implications
CounCil ACTion: authorize staff to proceed to planning phase or not
Baseline Evaluation by Staff
»Test idea against system plan guiding principles, recommendations, and decision
principles
»Depending on the scope of the idea, decision can be made by staff or introduced to the
Parks & Recreation Commission
STAFF ACTion: authorize project
Parks & Recreation Commission Review
»Review proposal, evaluating if the idea has merit, how it relates to guiding principles and
policies, and broad-based fiscal implications
»Depending on scope of the idea, decision can be made here or sent on to the City Council
P+R CoMM. ACTion: authorize project
Decision Principle Checklist
Will the project...
serve an unmet need?
provide a new recreational opportunity?
inspire community pride?
increase awareness of history, culture, and art?
advance outreach, communication, and community building with cultural groups?
build community awareness, advocacy, and passion for recreation and parks?
support healthy living and choices?
improve efficiency of parks and recreation services?
fulfill other city goals or policies?
affect the environment positively or negatively?
help engage and connect people, parks, trails, and open spaces?
address a geographic or programming need identified in the system planning
process?
improve pedestrian and bicycle connectivity?
be economically sustainable in the short and long term?
have adequate future funding for life cycle and operational costs?
be a catalyst for private sector investment?
be served by partnership and volunteer opportunities?WHO? WHAT? WHY?HOW?WHERE?Figure 6-1. Decision Principle Checklist
6-79 ImplementationSEPTEMBER 2017
make yoUr oWn ProJect ProPosal
Write your idea here!
What is it?
Page 1
Who does it?Where would you do it?
Please fill out the following questions to the best of your ability, and feel free to attach any additional
information if needed
Will the project...
serve an unmet need?
provide a new recreational opportunity?
inspire community pride?
increase awareness of history, culture, and
art?
advance outreach, communication, and
community building with cultural groups?
build community awareness, advocacy, and
passion for recreation and parks?
support healthy living and choices?
improve efficiency of parks and recreation
services?
fulfill other city goals or policies?
affect the environment positively or
negatively?
help engage and connect people, parks,
trails, and open spaces?
address a geographic or programming need
identified in the system planning process?
improve pedestrian and bicycle
connectivity?
be economically sustainable in the short and
long term?
have adequate future funding for life cycle
and operational costs?
be a catalyst for private sector investment?
be served by partnership and volunteer
opportunities?
Please check all that apply and include a brief description of how each applicable question is addressed
WHo? WHat? WHy?HoW?WHere?(Complete this worksheet and submit it to the City Parks and Recreation Department.)
Figure 6-2. Project Proposal Worksheet
6-80 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017
List Additional Resources &
Considerations for the Project
aDDitional inFormation
Page 2
Proposer’s Name/Organization
Goal/Motivation
What is the primary reason for proposing this idea? What do you hope to
achieve?
Objectives
What are the tangible/measurable outcomes you’d like to see in the short term
(next 6 months)?
Action Steps
What needs to happen for your idea to become a reality? Who do you think
would be responsible? Set a deadline!
Action Responsibility Deadline
6-81 ImplementationSEPTEMBER 2017
PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Tuesday, July 27, 2021
Subject 2021 4th of July Celebration Evaluation
Section REPORTS Item No: I.1.
Prepared By Priya Tandon, Recreation Supervisor File No:
SUBJECT
2021 4th of July Celebration Evaluation
SUMMARY
The 38th annual 4th of July Celebration was held FridaySunday, July 2, 3, and 4 in downtown Chanhassen. The 4th
of July is the most anticipated community event of the year, and it is estimated that over 60,000 people enjoyed at
least one aspect of this year's threeday celebration.
Below is a breakdown summarizing all events, recommendations for next year, and a preliminary financial report.
FRIDAY, JULY 2ND
Family Night at the Carnival
This evening of the carnival offers families a chance to enjoy fair concessions, discounted rides, and shorter lines in a
lesscrowded setting. Pony rides were not offered this year due to COVIDrelated factors, but will be back at Family
Night in 2022. It is estimated that about 5,500 people participated in this year's Family Night, with the evening's
attendance continuing to trend upwards annually.
SATURDAY, JULY 3RD
Minnesota Twins Youth Baseball Clinic
177 kids ages 612 received instruction at the Minnesota Twins Youth Baseball Clinic. Two sessions were held at the
Chanhassen High School Storm and Red Bird baseball stadium. The City has developed a strong relationship with the
Minnesota Twins, and we look forward to continuing to offer this clinic in the future.
Chanhassen Farmers' Market
The weekly farmers' market, held Saturdays from 9am1pm at City Center Park, fell during this year's schedule of
events. Fifteen food, flower, and craft vendors saw high attendance at the July 3 market.
Water Wars
The Water Wars water balloon stand continues to be a fun activity for all ages. The warm weather kept steady crowds
throughout the evening. The City receives 20% of Water Wars' overall sales.
Carnival
PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORTTuesday, July 27, 2021Subject2021 4th of July Celebration EvaluationSectionREPORTS Item No: I.1.Prepared By Priya Tandon, Recreation Supervisor File No: SUBJECT2021 4th of July Celebration EvaluationSUMMARYThe 38th annual 4th of July Celebration was held FridaySunday, July 2, 3, and 4 in downtown Chanhassen. The 4thof July is the most anticipated community event of the year, and it is estimated that over 60,000 people enjoyed atleast one aspect of this year's threeday celebration. Below is a breakdown summarizing all events, recommendations for next year, and a preliminary financial report. FRIDAY, JULY 2NDFamily Night at the CarnivalThis evening of the carnival offers families a chance to enjoy fair concessions, discounted rides, and shorter lines in alesscrowded setting. Pony rides were not offered this year due to COVIDrelated factors, but will be back at FamilyNight in 2022. It is estimated that about 5,500 people participated in this year's Family Night, with the evening'sattendance continuing to trend upwards annually.SATURDAY, JULY 3RD Minnesota Twins Youth Baseball Clinic 177 kids ages 612 received instruction at the Minnesota Twins Youth Baseball Clinic. Two sessions were held at theChanhassen High School Storm and Red Bird baseball stadium. The City has developed a strong relationship with theMinnesota Twins, and we look forward to continuing to offer this clinic in the future. Chanhassen Farmers' Market The weekly farmers' market, held Saturdays from 9am1pm at City Center Park, fell during this year's schedule ofevents. Fifteen food, flower, and craft vendors saw high attendance at the July 3 market. Water WarsThe Water Wars water balloon stand continues to be a fun activity for all ages. The warm weather kept steady crowdsthroughout the evening. The City receives 20% of Water Wars' overall sales.
Carnival
The carnival rides, games, and concessions continue to be very popular on July 3 and are a great asset to the
celebration. Midwest Rides provided 13 rides, 10 games, and 6 food booths. Unlimited ride wristbands were offered
for $25 on this night.
Business Expo
Twentyone local businesses and nonprofits participated in this year's Business Expo, presented by the SouthWest
Metro Chamber of Commerce. Participation was slightly below typical levels, likely due to short notice and staffing
challenges facing many businesses. The timing of the event was also changed to earlier in the evening, increasing traffic
through the tent. The SouthWest Metro Chamber of Commerce contributed $1,800 towards the tent rental and
electrical needs. Overall, this event promotes our local community businesses, and staff will work with the SouthWest
Metro Chamber to continue this event in the future.
The Medicine Show
This entertaining, roaming vaudeville show intermingled with crowds throughout their evening performance. They are a
popular attraction, who have a significant following and have been part of the 4th of July Celebration for many years.
Face Painting, Wacky Hair, & Tattoos
Maund Entertainment offered face painting, air brush tattoos, and wacky hairdos for $3$15. It continues to be a
popular attraction for families. The City receives 20% of Maund Entertainment's overall sales.
Kiddie Games
The Kiddie Games are a fun feature of the celebration and provide inexpensive entertainment for children at
$0.25/game. The games are coordinated by the City and operated by seasonal playground and concession staff. They
did a great job and brought a lot of energy and enthusiasm to the games. The kiddie games generated $649.54 in
revenue.
Kiddie Parade
Over 1,500 participants and spectators took part in this year's Kiddie Parade. Participants decorated bicycles,
scooters, wagons, and more to parade from Chanhassen Elementary, down Iroquois and Chan View to City Hall,
where they received a treat. New this year, kiddywampus in Chanhassen offered two free bicycledecorating events,
which were promoted by the City and very popular with Kiddie Parade participants. Special thanks to the
Chanhassen Fire Department and Carver County Sheriff's Office for their assistance with safety and traffic control.
Tae Kwon Do Demo
The Chanhassen Recreation Center's Tae Kwon Do program performed a free demonstration near the carnival area.
The students enjoy performing at the event, which also provides great exposure for the City's program.
ChalkitUp Drawing Contest
Fortyfive groups participated in the annual chalk drawing contest. Prizes were awarded to the winners in two
categories, most creative and most difficult, for three age groups. This event is coordinated by the City and judged by
seasonal playground staff. It maintains popularity throughout the night, is inexpensive to offer, and utilizes the hockey
rink at City Center Park.
3rd Lair Summer Skateboard Series
3rd Lair came to the Chanhassen Skate Park and hosted a competition as part of their summerlong series. The event
attracts teens from all over the Twin Cities and is a great way to incorporate all age groups into the celebration, and all
of the facilities at City Center Park.
First Aid Tent
Again this year, the Chanhassen Fire Department staffed a First Aid Tent on July 3rd at City Center Park. No major
injuries or accidents were reported during the celebration, although due to high temperatures a few heatrelated
instances occurred. Special thanks to the department for their continued support.
Nursing and Baby Changing Tents
Tents providing privacy were offered for families to change infant children and for nursing women and their children.
PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORTTuesday, July 27, 2021Subject2021 4th of July Celebration EvaluationSectionREPORTS Item No: I.1.Prepared By Priya Tandon, Recreation Supervisor File No: SUBJECT2021 4th of July Celebration EvaluationSUMMARYThe 38th annual 4th of July Celebration was held FridaySunday, July 2, 3, and 4 in downtown Chanhassen. The 4thof July is the most anticipated community event of the year, and it is estimated that over 60,000 people enjoyed atleast one aspect of this year's threeday celebration. Below is a breakdown summarizing all events, recommendations for next year, and a preliminary financial report. FRIDAY, JULY 2NDFamily Night at the CarnivalThis evening of the carnival offers families a chance to enjoy fair concessions, discounted rides, and shorter lines in alesscrowded setting. Pony rides were not offered this year due to COVIDrelated factors, but will be back at FamilyNight in 2022. It is estimated that about 5,500 people participated in this year's Family Night, with the evening'sattendance continuing to trend upwards annually.SATURDAY, JULY 3RD Minnesota Twins Youth Baseball Clinic 177 kids ages 612 received instruction at the Minnesota Twins Youth Baseball Clinic. Two sessions were held at theChanhassen High School Storm and Red Bird baseball stadium. The City has developed a strong relationship with theMinnesota Twins, and we look forward to continuing to offer this clinic in the future. Chanhassen Farmers' Market The weekly farmers' market, held Saturdays from 9am1pm at City Center Park, fell during this year's schedule ofevents. Fifteen food, flower, and craft vendors saw high attendance at the July 3 market. Water WarsThe Water Wars water balloon stand continues to be a fun activity for all ages. The warm weather kept steady crowdsthroughout the evening. The City receives 20% of Water Wars' overall sales. CarnivalThe carnival rides, games, and concessions continue to be very popular on July 3 and are a great asset to thecelebration. Midwest Rides provided 13 rides, 10 games, and 6 food booths. Unlimited ride wristbands were offeredfor $25 on this night. Business ExpoTwentyone local businesses and nonprofits participated in this year's Business Expo, presented by the SouthWestMetro Chamber of Commerce. Participation was slightly below typical levels, likely due to short notice and staffingchallenges facing many businesses. The timing of the event was also changed to earlier in the evening, increasing trafficthrough the tent. The SouthWest Metro Chamber of Commerce contributed $1,800 towards the tent rental andelectrical needs. Overall, this event promotes our local community businesses, and staff will work with the SouthWestMetro Chamber to continue this event in the future. The Medicine ShowThis entertaining, roaming vaudeville show intermingled with crowds throughout their evening performance. They are apopular attraction, who have a significant following and have been part of the 4th of July Celebration for many years. Face Painting, Wacky Hair, & TattoosMaund Entertainment offered face painting, air brush tattoos, and wacky hairdos for $3$15. It continues to be apopular attraction for families. The City receives 20% of Maund Entertainment's overall sales. Kiddie GamesThe Kiddie Games are a fun feature of the celebration and provide inexpensive entertainment for children at$0.25/game. The games are coordinated by the City and operated by seasonal playground and concession staff. Theydid a great job and brought a lot of energy and enthusiasm to the games. The kiddie games generated $649.54 inrevenue. Kiddie ParadeOver 1,500 participants and spectators took part in this year's Kiddie Parade. Participants decorated bicycles,scooters, wagons, and more to parade from Chanhassen Elementary, down Iroquois and Chan View to City Hall,where they received a treat. New this year, kiddywampus in Chanhassen offered two free bicycledecorating events,which were promoted by the City and very popular with Kiddie Parade participants. Special thanks to theChanhassen Fire Department and Carver County Sheriff's Office for their assistance with safety and traffic control. Tae Kwon Do DemoThe Chanhassen Recreation Center's Tae Kwon Do program performed a free demonstration near the carnival area.The students enjoy performing at the event, which also provides great exposure for the City's program. ChalkitUp Drawing ContestFortyfive groups participated in the annual chalk drawing contest. Prizes were awarded to the winners in twocategories, most creative and most difficult, for three age groups. This event is coordinated by the City and judged byseasonal playground staff. It maintains popularity throughout the night, is inexpensive to offer, and utilizes the hockeyrink at City Center Park. 3rd Lair Summer Skateboard Series 3rd Lair came to the Chanhassen Skate Park and hosted a competition as part of their summerlong series. The eventattracts teens from all over the Twin Cities and is a great way to incorporate all age groups into the celebration, and allof the facilities at City Center Park. First Aid TentAgain this year, the Chanhassen Fire Department staffed a First Aid Tent on July 3rd at City Center Park. No majorinjuries or accidents were reported during the celebration, although due to high temperatures a few heatrelatedinstances occurred. Special thanks to the department for their continued support.
Nursing and Baby Changing Tents
Tents providing privacy were offered for families to change infant children and for nursing women and their children.
The tents provide a valuable service to the many families that visit the event. The tents were not monitored by
volunteers this year, and the City will look for a new sponsor to oversee the tents in future years.
Taste of Chanhassen, presented by the Rotary Club of Chanhassen
This year, 10 mostly local businesses (7 restaurants and 3 food trucks) participated in the Taste of Chanhassen, which
was organized by the Rotary Club of Chanhassen. Having a majority of local, specifically Chanhassenbased,
businesses ads to the community feel of the event. Ten food vendors has been established as the ideal number of
vendors, based on available space and patron experience. The City and Rotary will continue to prioritize recruiting
Chanhassen businesses for this event component in future years.
Beer Garden, presented by the Rotary Club of Chanhassen
The Rotary Club of Chanhassen also presented the annual Beer Garden, a wildly popular component of the
celebration that naturally pairs with the evening live music and Street Dance. The Rotary sold both beer and seltzer,
with proceeds used to fund community youth scholarships and other local outreach initiatives. The Rotary Club paid
$4,686.19 towards equipment rental for both the Taste of Chanhassen and Beer Garden.
Live Music by Stone Daisy
The Stone Daisy Band put on a great performance to open the Street Dance for PopROCKS. The band was well
received by patrons, and they had groups up on the dance floor throughout their set.
Live Music by Pop ROCKS
The Pop ROCKS band entertained thousands during this year's Street Dance, with their energetic set and many
costume changes. This was their first performance at the 4th of July Celebration.
SUNDAY, JULY 4TH
Adult Fishing Contest
A total of 50 participants registered in this year's adult fishing contest on Lake Ann, generating $1,000 in revenue
($20/ticket). Prizes were awarded to the top three fish in two categories: longest northern pike and longest largemouth
bass. Each participant also was given a door prize. Photos of each fish were submitted using Cityprovided bump
boards. The fishing contest continues to be a popular tradition, and is a great activity to offer our adult population.
Kids' Fishing Contest
Onehundredtwenty kids participated in this year's kids' fishing contest at the Lake Ann fishing pier. Trophies and
other prizes were awarded to the winners of the heaviest fish, longest fish, and shortest fish in two age categories. In
addition to the top fish prizes, all participants were entered into a door prize drawing. The contest was coordinated by
the Playground Director and Park & Recreation Intern, who did a fantastic job. There was much positive feedback
around this year's kids' fishing contest.
Sand Sculpture Contest
Around 10 groups participated in the annual sand sculpture contest, organized by the Playground Director and judged
by seasonal playground staff. Prizes were awarded to the most difficult and most creative sculptures in three age
groups. The sand sculpture contest has been a tradition for years, and is a great way to incorporate events into
different parts of Lake Ann Park.
Medallion Hunt
This is a fun and simple event that should be continued in the future. The medallion was hidden within the bounds of
Lake Ann Park, with clues posted every 20 minutes at the Lake Ann concession stand. This year's medallion was
hidden underneath a light post near ballfield #4. Clues were developed by the Park & Recreation Intern, who did a
great job coordinating the hunt.
Log Rolling
Waterlog rolling was provided as a free activity by Carver County Parks at the Lake Ann Beach. This activity is an
opportunity for parkgoers to try something new on their 4th of July visit to Lake Ann.
PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORTTuesday, July 27, 2021Subject2021 4th of July Celebration EvaluationSectionREPORTS Item No: I.1.Prepared By Priya Tandon, Recreation Supervisor File No: SUBJECT2021 4th of July Celebration EvaluationSUMMARYThe 38th annual 4th of July Celebration was held FridaySunday, July 2, 3, and 4 in downtown Chanhassen. The 4thof July is the most anticipated community event of the year, and it is estimated that over 60,000 people enjoyed atleast one aspect of this year's threeday celebration. Below is a breakdown summarizing all events, recommendations for next year, and a preliminary financial report. FRIDAY, JULY 2NDFamily Night at the CarnivalThis evening of the carnival offers families a chance to enjoy fair concessions, discounted rides, and shorter lines in alesscrowded setting. Pony rides were not offered this year due to COVIDrelated factors, but will be back at FamilyNight in 2022. It is estimated that about 5,500 people participated in this year's Family Night, with the evening'sattendance continuing to trend upwards annually.SATURDAY, JULY 3RD Minnesota Twins Youth Baseball Clinic 177 kids ages 612 received instruction at the Minnesota Twins Youth Baseball Clinic. Two sessions were held at theChanhassen High School Storm and Red Bird baseball stadium. The City has developed a strong relationship with theMinnesota Twins, and we look forward to continuing to offer this clinic in the future. Chanhassen Farmers' Market The weekly farmers' market, held Saturdays from 9am1pm at City Center Park, fell during this year's schedule ofevents. Fifteen food, flower, and craft vendors saw high attendance at the July 3 market. Water WarsThe Water Wars water balloon stand continues to be a fun activity for all ages. The warm weather kept steady crowdsthroughout the evening. The City receives 20% of Water Wars' overall sales. CarnivalThe carnival rides, games, and concessions continue to be very popular on July 3 and are a great asset to thecelebration. Midwest Rides provided 13 rides, 10 games, and 6 food booths. Unlimited ride wristbands were offeredfor $25 on this night. Business ExpoTwentyone local businesses and nonprofits participated in this year's Business Expo, presented by the SouthWestMetro Chamber of Commerce. Participation was slightly below typical levels, likely due to short notice and staffingchallenges facing many businesses. The timing of the event was also changed to earlier in the evening, increasing trafficthrough the tent. The SouthWest Metro Chamber of Commerce contributed $1,800 towards the tent rental andelectrical needs. Overall, this event promotes our local community businesses, and staff will work with the SouthWestMetro Chamber to continue this event in the future. The Medicine ShowThis entertaining, roaming vaudeville show intermingled with crowds throughout their evening performance. They are apopular attraction, who have a significant following and have been part of the 4th of July Celebration for many years. Face Painting, Wacky Hair, & TattoosMaund Entertainment offered face painting, air brush tattoos, and wacky hairdos for $3$15. It continues to be apopular attraction for families. The City receives 20% of Maund Entertainment's overall sales. Kiddie GamesThe Kiddie Games are a fun feature of the celebration and provide inexpensive entertainment for children at$0.25/game. The games are coordinated by the City and operated by seasonal playground and concession staff. Theydid a great job and brought a lot of energy and enthusiasm to the games. The kiddie games generated $649.54 inrevenue. Kiddie ParadeOver 1,500 participants and spectators took part in this year's Kiddie Parade. Participants decorated bicycles,scooters, wagons, and more to parade from Chanhassen Elementary, down Iroquois and Chan View to City Hall,where they received a treat. New this year, kiddywampus in Chanhassen offered two free bicycledecorating events,which were promoted by the City and very popular with Kiddie Parade participants. Special thanks to theChanhassen Fire Department and Carver County Sheriff's Office for their assistance with safety and traffic control. Tae Kwon Do DemoThe Chanhassen Recreation Center's Tae Kwon Do program performed a free demonstration near the carnival area.The students enjoy performing at the event, which also provides great exposure for the City's program. ChalkitUp Drawing ContestFortyfive groups participated in the annual chalk drawing contest. Prizes were awarded to the winners in twocategories, most creative and most difficult, for three age groups. This event is coordinated by the City and judged byseasonal playground staff. It maintains popularity throughout the night, is inexpensive to offer, and utilizes the hockeyrink at City Center Park. 3rd Lair Summer Skateboard Series 3rd Lair came to the Chanhassen Skate Park and hosted a competition as part of their summerlong series. The eventattracts teens from all over the Twin Cities and is a great way to incorporate all age groups into the celebration, and allof the facilities at City Center Park. First Aid TentAgain this year, the Chanhassen Fire Department staffed a First Aid Tent on July 3rd at City Center Park. No majorinjuries or accidents were reported during the celebration, although due to high temperatures a few heatrelatedinstances occurred. Special thanks to the department for their continued support. Nursing and Baby Changing Tents Tents providing privacy were offered for families to change infant children and for nursing women and their children.The tents provide a valuable service to the many families that visit the event. The tents were not monitored byvolunteers this year, and the City will look for a new sponsor to oversee the tents in future years. Taste of Chanhassen, presented by the Rotary Club of ChanhassenThis year, 10 mostly local businesses (7 restaurants and 3 food trucks) participated in the Taste of Chanhassen, whichwas organized by the Rotary Club of Chanhassen. Having a majority of local, specifically Chanhassenbased,businesses ads to the community feel of the event. Ten food vendors has been established as the ideal number ofvendors, based on available space and patron experience. The City and Rotary will continue to prioritize recruitingChanhassen businesses for this event component in future years. Beer Garden, presented by the Rotary Club of ChanhassenThe Rotary Club of Chanhassen also presented the annual Beer Garden, a wildly popular component of thecelebration that naturally pairs with the evening live music and Street Dance. The Rotary sold both beer and seltzer,with proceeds used to fund community youth scholarships and other local outreach initiatives. The Rotary Club paid$4,686.19 towards equipment rental for both the Taste of Chanhassen and Beer Garden. Live Music by Stone DaisyThe Stone Daisy Band put on a great performance to open the Street Dance for PopROCKS. The band was wellreceived by patrons, and they had groups up on the dance floor throughout their set. Live Music by Pop ROCKS The Pop ROCKS band entertained thousands during this year's Street Dance, with their energetic set and manycostume changes. This was their first performance at the 4th of July Celebration. SUNDAY, JULY 4TH Adult Fishing ContestA total of 50 participants registered in this year's adult fishing contest on Lake Ann, generating $1,000 in revenue($20/ticket). Prizes were awarded to the top three fish in two categories: longest northern pike and longest largemouthbass. Each participant also was given a door prize. Photos of each fish were submitted using Cityprovided bumpboards. The fishing contest continues to be a popular tradition, and is a great activity to offer our adult population. Kids' Fishing ContestOnehundredtwenty kids participated in this year's kids' fishing contest at the Lake Ann fishing pier. Trophies andother prizes were awarded to the winners of the heaviest fish, longest fish, and shortest fish in two age categories. Inaddition to the top fish prizes, all participants were entered into a door prize drawing. The contest was coordinated bythe Playground Director and Park & Recreation Intern, who did a fantastic job. There was much positive feedbackaround this year's kids' fishing contest. Sand Sculpture ContestAround 10 groups participated in the annual sand sculpture contest, organized by the Playground Director and judgedby seasonal playground staff. Prizes were awarded to the most difficult and most creative sculptures in three agegroups. The sand sculpture contest has been a tradition for years, and is a great way to incorporate events intodifferent parts of Lake Ann Park. Medallion HuntThis is a fun and simple event that should be continued in the future. The medallion was hidden within the bounds ofLake Ann Park, with clues posted every 20 minutes at the Lake Ann concession stand. This year's medallion washidden underneath a light post near ballfield #4. Clues were developed by the Park & Recreation Intern, who did agreat job coordinating the hunt. Log Rolling Waterlog rolling was provided as a free activity by Carver County Parks at the Lake Ann Beach. This activity is an
opportunity for parkgoers to try something new on their 4th of July visit to Lake Ann.
Carnival and Face Painting
The carnival and face painting was also offered on July 4th at City Center Park. Rides, games, concessions, and face
painting were enjoyed by many on this day, before and after the 4th of July parade. Discounted rides were offered
from 3:306pm, drawing visitors to the carnival after the parade as well.
Classic Car Show, presented by the Rotary Club of Chanhassen
With support from the City of Chanhassen, the Rotary Club took the lead in organizing the Classic Car Show. It
continues to be a popular attraction before the parade and is becoming a tradition of the 4th of July Celebration. This
year, the car show produced over 75 entries!
Taste of Chanhassen and Beer Garden, presented by the Rotary Club of Chanhassen
The Taste of Chanhassen and Beer Garden were again offered on July 4th. Moderate crowds enjoyed food and
beverages while listening to live music, strolling through the carnival, and waiting for the parade. New this year, the
Rotary Club also sold beer and seltzer at Lake Ann Park from 29pm. The Rotary would like to continue this practice
in the future.
Live Music featuring American Bootleg
American Bootleg, a local fourpiece band, performed from 11:45am1:45pm under the big tent prior to the parade.
They put on a great performance. Staff recommends continuing to have bands perform before the start of the parade.
4th of July Parade
The Rotary Club of Chanhassen produced the parade again this year with logistical support from the City and Carver
County Sheriff's Office. We appreciate the service of the Rotary and look forward to continuing to work on this event
with them in the future.
The parade consisted of approximately 55 entries. Overall, the parade continues to be the most popular attraction of
the celebration with around 20,000 spectators. Crowds flood the downtown area and nearby neighborhoods, with
groups reserving their viewing space days in advance. Additional parade marshals will be needed in the future to
perform crowd control and keeping spectators at the curb line. Park Maintenance staff trailed the end of the parade to
assist in cleanup by picking up trash along the route. This worked well as it encouraged people to pick up trash
around them and made cleanup much easier. Once again, the Rotary Club of Chanhassen is a great partnering
organization to work with, and their financial and volunteer support is greatly appreciated. The Rotary pays the City to
cover the cost of paraderoute restrooms, barricades, and cones.
New this year at the parade was a llama experience, presented by the Rotary and Carlson's Lovable Llamas in
Waconia. The llama experience was well received and could continue in the future.
Fireworks Display
This year's fireworks show was contracted through Pyrotechnic Display, and was the second year of a threeyear
contract. They coordinated an excellent display that lasted 21 minutes. It is estimated that about 35,000 spectators
viewed the show from throughout the City.
Suggestions for 2022
1. Bring back 2019 event components that were cancelled due to COVID, such as pony rides, Tshirt sales,
Bingo, and a highquality, color event brochure with preevent distribution.
2. Begin Tshirt sales in early June to increase sales.
3. Expand the Information and Lost & Found tent from Saturday only to Sunday to assist event patrons and offer
lost & found services.
4. Focus on recruiting local Chanhassen restaurants and food trucks for the Taste of Chanhassen before expanding
to other SouthWest Metro vendors.
5. Increase signage for events at Lake Ann Park on the 4th of July to increase participation.
6. Publicize the volunteer signup to the general public as part of regular City promotion of the 4th of July event in
print, on the website, and via social media. Consider offering an incentive for public volunteers, such as one free
drink ticket or a 4th of July Tshirt.
PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORTTuesday, July 27, 2021Subject2021 4th of July Celebration EvaluationSectionREPORTS Item No: I.1.Prepared By Priya Tandon, Recreation Supervisor File No: SUBJECT2021 4th of July Celebration EvaluationSUMMARYThe 38th annual 4th of July Celebration was held FridaySunday, July 2, 3, and 4 in downtown Chanhassen. The 4thof July is the most anticipated community event of the year, and it is estimated that over 60,000 people enjoyed atleast one aspect of this year's threeday celebration. Below is a breakdown summarizing all events, recommendations for next year, and a preliminary financial report. FRIDAY, JULY 2NDFamily Night at the CarnivalThis evening of the carnival offers families a chance to enjoy fair concessions, discounted rides, and shorter lines in alesscrowded setting. Pony rides were not offered this year due to COVIDrelated factors, but will be back at FamilyNight in 2022. It is estimated that about 5,500 people participated in this year's Family Night, with the evening'sattendance continuing to trend upwards annually.SATURDAY, JULY 3RD Minnesota Twins Youth Baseball Clinic 177 kids ages 612 received instruction at the Minnesota Twins Youth Baseball Clinic. Two sessions were held at theChanhassen High School Storm and Red Bird baseball stadium. The City has developed a strong relationship with theMinnesota Twins, and we look forward to continuing to offer this clinic in the future. Chanhassen Farmers' Market The weekly farmers' market, held Saturdays from 9am1pm at City Center Park, fell during this year's schedule ofevents. Fifteen food, flower, and craft vendors saw high attendance at the July 3 market. Water WarsThe Water Wars water balloon stand continues to be a fun activity for all ages. The warm weather kept steady crowdsthroughout the evening. The City receives 20% of Water Wars' overall sales. CarnivalThe carnival rides, games, and concessions continue to be very popular on July 3 and are a great asset to thecelebration. Midwest Rides provided 13 rides, 10 games, and 6 food booths. Unlimited ride wristbands were offeredfor $25 on this night. Business ExpoTwentyone local businesses and nonprofits participated in this year's Business Expo, presented by the SouthWestMetro Chamber of Commerce. Participation was slightly below typical levels, likely due to short notice and staffingchallenges facing many businesses. The timing of the event was also changed to earlier in the evening, increasing trafficthrough the tent. The SouthWest Metro Chamber of Commerce contributed $1,800 towards the tent rental andelectrical needs. Overall, this event promotes our local community businesses, and staff will work with the SouthWestMetro Chamber to continue this event in the future. The Medicine ShowThis entertaining, roaming vaudeville show intermingled with crowds throughout their evening performance. They are apopular attraction, who have a significant following and have been part of the 4th of July Celebration for many years. Face Painting, Wacky Hair, & TattoosMaund Entertainment offered face painting, air brush tattoos, and wacky hairdos for $3$15. It continues to be apopular attraction for families. The City receives 20% of Maund Entertainment's overall sales. Kiddie GamesThe Kiddie Games are a fun feature of the celebration and provide inexpensive entertainment for children at$0.25/game. The games are coordinated by the City and operated by seasonal playground and concession staff. Theydid a great job and brought a lot of energy and enthusiasm to the games. The kiddie games generated $649.54 inrevenue. Kiddie ParadeOver 1,500 participants and spectators took part in this year's Kiddie Parade. Participants decorated bicycles,scooters, wagons, and more to parade from Chanhassen Elementary, down Iroquois and Chan View to City Hall,where they received a treat. New this year, kiddywampus in Chanhassen offered two free bicycledecorating events,which were promoted by the City and very popular with Kiddie Parade participants. Special thanks to theChanhassen Fire Department and Carver County Sheriff's Office for their assistance with safety and traffic control. Tae Kwon Do DemoThe Chanhassen Recreation Center's Tae Kwon Do program performed a free demonstration near the carnival area.The students enjoy performing at the event, which also provides great exposure for the City's program. ChalkitUp Drawing ContestFortyfive groups participated in the annual chalk drawing contest. Prizes were awarded to the winners in twocategories, most creative and most difficult, for three age groups. This event is coordinated by the City and judged byseasonal playground staff. It maintains popularity throughout the night, is inexpensive to offer, and utilizes the hockeyrink at City Center Park. 3rd Lair Summer Skateboard Series 3rd Lair came to the Chanhassen Skate Park and hosted a competition as part of their summerlong series. The eventattracts teens from all over the Twin Cities and is a great way to incorporate all age groups into the celebration, and allof the facilities at City Center Park. First Aid TentAgain this year, the Chanhassen Fire Department staffed a First Aid Tent on July 3rd at City Center Park. No majorinjuries or accidents were reported during the celebration, although due to high temperatures a few heatrelatedinstances occurred. Special thanks to the department for their continued support. Nursing and Baby Changing Tents Tents providing privacy were offered for families to change infant children and for nursing women and their children.The tents provide a valuable service to the many families that visit the event. The tents were not monitored byvolunteers this year, and the City will look for a new sponsor to oversee the tents in future years. Taste of Chanhassen, presented by the Rotary Club of ChanhassenThis year, 10 mostly local businesses (7 restaurants and 3 food trucks) participated in the Taste of Chanhassen, whichwas organized by the Rotary Club of Chanhassen. Having a majority of local, specifically Chanhassenbased,businesses ads to the community feel of the event. Ten food vendors has been established as the ideal number ofvendors, based on available space and patron experience. The City and Rotary will continue to prioritize recruitingChanhassen businesses for this event component in future years. Beer Garden, presented by the Rotary Club of ChanhassenThe Rotary Club of Chanhassen also presented the annual Beer Garden, a wildly popular component of thecelebration that naturally pairs with the evening live music and Street Dance. The Rotary sold both beer and seltzer,with proceeds used to fund community youth scholarships and other local outreach initiatives. The Rotary Club paid$4,686.19 towards equipment rental for both the Taste of Chanhassen and Beer Garden. Live Music by Stone DaisyThe Stone Daisy Band put on a great performance to open the Street Dance for PopROCKS. The band was wellreceived by patrons, and they had groups up on the dance floor throughout their set. Live Music by Pop ROCKS The Pop ROCKS band entertained thousands during this year's Street Dance, with their energetic set and manycostume changes. This was their first performance at the 4th of July Celebration. SUNDAY, JULY 4TH Adult Fishing ContestA total of 50 participants registered in this year's adult fishing contest on Lake Ann, generating $1,000 in revenue($20/ticket). Prizes were awarded to the top three fish in two categories: longest northern pike and longest largemouthbass. Each participant also was given a door prize. Photos of each fish were submitted using Cityprovided bumpboards. The fishing contest continues to be a popular tradition, and is a great activity to offer our adult population. Kids' Fishing ContestOnehundredtwenty kids participated in this year's kids' fishing contest at the Lake Ann fishing pier. Trophies andother prizes were awarded to the winners of the heaviest fish, longest fish, and shortest fish in two age categories. Inaddition to the top fish prizes, all participants were entered into a door prize drawing. The contest was coordinated bythe Playground Director and Park & Recreation Intern, who did a fantastic job. There was much positive feedbackaround this year's kids' fishing contest. Sand Sculpture ContestAround 10 groups participated in the annual sand sculpture contest, organized by the Playground Director and judgedby seasonal playground staff. Prizes were awarded to the most difficult and most creative sculptures in three agegroups. The sand sculpture contest has been a tradition for years, and is a great way to incorporate events intodifferent parts of Lake Ann Park. Medallion HuntThis is a fun and simple event that should be continued in the future. The medallion was hidden within the bounds ofLake Ann Park, with clues posted every 20 minutes at the Lake Ann concession stand. This year's medallion washidden underneath a light post near ballfield #4. Clues were developed by the Park & Recreation Intern, who did agreat job coordinating the hunt. Log Rolling Waterlog rolling was provided as a free activity by Carver County Parks at the Lake Ann Beach. This activity is anopportunity for parkgoers to try something new on their 4th of July visit to Lake Ann. Carnival and Face PaintingThe carnival and face painting was also offered on July 4th at City Center Park. Rides, games, concessions, and facepainting were enjoyed by many on this day, before and after the 4th of July parade. Discounted rides were offeredfrom 3:306pm, drawing visitors to the carnival after the parade as well. Classic Car Show, presented by the Rotary Club of ChanhassenWith support from the City of Chanhassen, the Rotary Club took the lead in organizing the Classic Car Show. Itcontinues to be a popular attraction before the parade and is becoming a tradition of the 4th of July Celebration. Thisyear, the car show produced over 75 entries!Taste of Chanhassen and Beer Garden, presented by the Rotary Club of ChanhassenThe Taste of Chanhassen and Beer Garden were again offered on July 4th. Moderate crowds enjoyed food andbeverages while listening to live music, strolling through the carnival, and waiting for the parade. New this year, theRotary Club also sold beer and seltzer at Lake Ann Park from 29pm. The Rotary would like to continue this practicein the future. Live Music featuring American Bootleg American Bootleg, a local fourpiece band, performed from 11:45am1:45pm under the big tent prior to the parade.They put on a great performance. Staff recommends continuing to have bands perform before the start of the parade. 4th of July ParadeThe Rotary Club of Chanhassen produced the parade again this year with logistical support from the City and CarverCounty Sheriff's Office. We appreciate the service of the Rotary and look forward to continuing to work on this eventwith them in the future. The parade consisted of approximately 55 entries. Overall, the parade continues to be the most popular attraction ofthe celebration with around 20,000 spectators. Crowds flood the downtown area and nearby neighborhoods, withgroups reserving their viewing space days in advance. Additional parade marshals will be needed in the future toperform crowd control and keeping spectators at the curb line. Park Maintenance staff trailed the end of the parade toassist in cleanup by picking up trash along the route. This worked well as it encouraged people to pick up trasharound them and made cleanup much easier. Once again, the Rotary Club of Chanhassen is a great partneringorganization to work with, and their financial and volunteer support is greatly appreciated. The Rotary pays the City tocover the cost of paraderoute restrooms, barricades, and cones. New this year at the parade was a llama experience, presented by the Rotary and Carlson's Lovable Llamas inWaconia. The llama experience was well received and could continue in the future. Fireworks DisplayThis year's fireworks show was contracted through Pyrotechnic Display, and was the second year of a threeyearcontract. They coordinated an excellent display that lasted 21 minutes. It is estimated that about 35,000 spectatorsviewed the show from throughout the City. Suggestions for 20221. Bring back 2019 event components that were cancelled due to COVID, such as pony rides, Tshirt sales,Bingo, and a highquality, color event brochure with preevent distribution. 2. Begin Tshirt sales in early June to increase sales. 3. Expand the Information and Lost & Found tent from Saturday only to Sunday to assist event patrons and offerlost & found services. 4. Focus on recruiting local Chanhassen restaurants and food trucks for the Taste of Chanhassen before expandingto other SouthWest Metro vendors. 5. Increase signage for events at Lake Ann Park on the 4th of July to increase participation. 6. Publicize the volunteer signup to the general public as part of regular City promotion of the 4th of July event inprint, on the website, and via social media. Consider offering an incentive for public volunteers, such as one free
drink ticket or a 4th of July Tshirt.
ATTACHMENTS:
2021 Expense Report
2021 4TH of July Celebration
Revenue and Expenditure Report
REVENUE
Adult Fishing Contest $ 1,000.00
*Carnival Rides and Games $ 8,400.00
*Maund Entertainment $ 150.00
Water Wars $ 79.00
Kiddie Games $ 561.49
SouthWest Metro Chamber of Commerce $ 1,800.00
Rotary Club of Chanhassen $ 5,701.58
Total $ 17,692.07
EXPENDITURES
101-1613-4130 (Budget: $5,000)
Kids’ contests: supplies and prizes $ 547.02
Kids’ activities: supplies $ 365.95
Contest trophies & medallion $ 150.20
Medallion Hunt prize basket $ 141.54
Safety signage $ 175.29
Baby changing tent supplies $ 98.46
Staff lunch $ 182.22
Ice $ 35.92
Total $ 1,696.60
101-1613-4300 (Budget: $44,000)
Pyrotechnic Display, Inc. $ 23,000.00
Horizon Talent Agency $ 500.00
PopROCKS Band $ 6,250.00
Stone Daisy Band $ 750.00
American Bootleg Band $ 500.00
The Medicine Show Band $ 650.00
Northern Audio Productions $ 2,743.00
Festival Production Services $ 2,545.00
American Security $ 1,350.00
Total $ 38,288.00
101-1613-4340 (Budget: $4,200)
VistaPrint $ 1,664.84
Southwest News Media $ 1,954.02
Total $ 3,618.86
101-1613-4400 (Budget: $6,000)
***Rent-n-Save Portable Services $ 4,730.00
Total $ 4,730.00
101-1613-4410 (Budget: $26,500)
**Ultimate Events (tents, tables, chairs) $ 22,674.74
*Waste Management $ 4,250.00
Merlin’s Ace Hardware $ 349.80
Yamaha Golf & Utility $ 342.80
**Warning Lites $ 2,264.00
Ziegler Cat $ 1040.00
Total $ 30,921.34
Total Revenue $ 17,692.07
Total Expenses $ 79,254.80
BALANCE - $ 61,562.73
* Items that have an asterisk are estimates
**Items that have two asterisks are a shared expense with the Rotary Club of Chanhassen and/or
SouthWest Metro Chamber of Commerce.
*The 4th of July Celebration is one of four events under the Community Event Sponsorship
Program. Over 55 businesses have contributed approximately $66,000 in cash and goods in
between 2020/2021 to support events in both 2020 and 2021.