The URL can be used to link to this page

2021 11 22 Agenda and Packet A.5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION Note: Unless otherwise noted, work sessions are held in the Fountain Conference Room in the lower level of City Hall and are open to the public. If the City Council does not complete the work session items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regular agenda. A.1 Budget, Enterprise and CIP Discussion A.2 Future Work Session Schedule B.7:00 P.M. - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING B.1 Approve Economic Development Authority Meeting Minutes dated March 8, 2021 B.2 Approve Release of Contract for Private Development for Gateway North TIF District 9, Gateway Development, LLC C.REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - CALL TO ORDER (Pledge of Allegiance) D.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS D.1 Invitation to Tree Lighting Ceremony, December 4 E.CONSENT AGENDA All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council and will be considered as one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item. Refer to the council packet for each staff report. E.1 Approve City Council Minutes dated November 8, 2021 AGENDA CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2021 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD 1 E.2 Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated October 19, 2021 E.3 Receive Senior Commission Minutes dated October 15, 2021 E.4 Receive Environmental Commission Minutes dated October 13, 2021 E.5 Approve Claims Paid November 22, 2021 E.6 Resolution 2021-XX: Determining the City will not Waive the Statutory Tort Limits E.7 Resolution 2021-XX: Accept Donation from Chanhassen Fire Department Relief Association to sponsor an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) E.8 Resolution 2021-XX: Accept Donation from Charter Bank Chanhassen for Annual Senior Center Holiday Party E.9 Resolution 2021-XX:Â Anthem on the Park, Project No. 2016-08 - Accept Public Stormwater Improvements E.10 Resolution 2021-XX: Approve Contract with Shadywood Tree Experts for Boulevard Tree Pruning E.11 Resolution 2021-XX: Authorize Purchase of a Bluetooth Card Reader Technology Upgrade for City Buildings. E.12 Approve Temporary On-Sale Liquor License to Rotary Club of Chanhassen for February Festival on February 5 at Lake Ann Park E.13 Approve Subordination Agreement with Bridgewater Bank for Chanhassen Gateway Place (721 Lake Susan Drive) E.14 Ordinance XXX: Amend Chanhassen City Code Chapter 9: Fire Prevention and Protection F.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Visitor Presentations requesting a response or action from the City Council must complete and submit the Citizen Action Request Form (see VISITOR GUIDELINES at the end of this agenda). G.FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE G.1 Monthly Fire Department Update with Response Data from October G.2 Law Enforcement Update for October H.PUBLIC HEARINGS I.GENERAL BUSINESS I.1 Minnetonka Middle School West Access Improvement Update 2 I.2 Approve a Request for Subdivision of Three Parcels into Three Lots and One Outlot and Site Plan Review for Development of an Approximately 82,000 Square-Foot, One-Story, Office- Warehouse Building Located at 2100 Stoughton Avenue (River Valley Industrial Center) J.COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS K.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS L.CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION L.1 Fringe Business (BF) District Reclassifying Conditional Uses as Interim Uses Next Steps M.CLOSED SESSION Closed as permitted by State Statute 13D.05, Subd. 3(c) to consider offers relating to the possible sale of City-owned property. M.1 Consider Letters of Intent to Purchase City Owned Property Located on Lot 1, Block 2, Gateway East 2nd Addition, PID 25-3010020 N.ADJOURNMENT GUIDELINES FOR VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Welcome to the Chanhassen City Council Meeting. In the interest of open communications, the Chanhassen City Council wishes to provide an opportunity for the public to address the City Council. That opportunity is provided at every regular City Council meeting during Visitor Presentations. Anyone seeking a response or action from the City Council following their presentation is required to complete and submit a Citizen Action Request Form. An online form is available at https://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/action or paper forms are available in the city council chambers prior to the meeting. Anyone indicating a desire to speak during Visitor Presentations will be acknowledged by the Mayor. When called upon to speak, state your name, address, and topic. All remarks shall be addressed to the City Council as a whole, not to any specific member(s) or to any person who is not a member of the City Council. If there are a number of individuals present to speak on the same topic, please designate a spokesperson that can summarize the issue. Limit your comments to five minutes. Additional time may be granted at the discretion of the Mayor. If you have written comments, provide a copy to the Council. During Visitor Presentations, the Council and staff listen to comments and will not engage in discussion. Council members or the City Manager may ask questions of you in order to gain a thorough understanding of your concern, suggestion or request. Please be aware that disrespectful comments or comments of a personal nature, directed at an individual either by name or inference, will not be allowed. Personnel concerns should be 3 directed to the City Manager. Members of the City Council and some staff members may gather at Brindisi’s Pub, 501 West 78th Street in Chanhassen immediately after the meeting for a purely social event. All members of the public are welcome. 4 City Council Item November 22, 2021 Item Budget, Enterprise and CIP Discussion File No.Item No: A.1 Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION Prepared By Kelly Strey, Finance Director Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION Staff is seeking direction for preparation of the resolution for the December 13, 2022 Truth-In- Taxation meeting to adopt the 2022 levy and budget. Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority Financial Sustainability SUMMARY This Council work session is the final budget work session for the 2022 budget. Staff is seeking direction to prepare the levy and budget resolutions for the next Council meeting on December 13. Staff has prepared the budget for consideration with a tax levy of $12,663,076. This represents a 4.9% levy increase. Growth in the tax base results in a lower percentage impact for most homeowners. The budget has been prepared to include cost increases to continue to fund current service levels and to fund capital plan funding increases as discussed in previous meetings. A use of General Fund balance is included to fund park renovation for 2022 in the Park Renovation Capital budget. This budget also includes two new initiatives which are partially funded by use of American Rescue Plan Funds (ARPA) and property tax levy increase for economic development and fire response. The consolidated budget for all funds is included in the Budget Summary section of the budget document. The budget document can be reviewed on the City's website at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us. 5 The draft 5-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is included in the budget document and is also attached to the background. BACKGROUND Budget Summary The City's total proposed budget for all funds is $33.7 million. The total revenue sources for all funds is $33.8 million which includes a property tax levy total for all funds of $12,663,076. The levy increase from the prior year levy is $596,376. That represents a 4.9% increase. Total Employee Services Employee services represent $10.1 million of the total budget. Employee services cost estimates include implementation of a new pay plan as recommended by the compensation study completed in earlier in 2021. The pay plan was reviewed with Council in October at a work session. This new pay plan provides a structured grade and step system and is based on market comparisons. Upon approval of the 2022 budget and pay plan, the implementation of the plan is scheduled for January 1 with 2.5% cost of the living adjustment and a phased-in mid-year first step July 1, 2022. Enterprise Funds Funding of costs between the General Fund and the Enterprise funds was fully reviewed this year and resulted in cost changes between funds to more fully cover the cost of doing business in the Enterprise funds. The result was a savings in the General Fund and additional costs in the Enterprise funds. The meter replacement and the enhanced service change to monthly billing is included in the budget as approved in 2021. We have reviewed the results of operations and projected future costs in the Enterprise funds by updating the rate study completed in 2021. Savings and adjustments to capital planning allows the budget to keep the rate increases in the Enterprise Funds the same as was planned in the 2021 rate study for 2022 and future years. Staff will provide an summary of the rate study update for the meeting. General Fund The General fund budget has been discussed at previous Council work sessions and received feedback from Council. Staff has prepared a proposed budget to include funding for current services. Revenue projections remain positive in the areas of permits and charges for services. The 2022 budget is planning on a $200,000 increase in revenues to offset increased expenses. Economic Development - The budget includes the addition of an Economic Development Manager. A portion of the funding ($50,000) for this position is planned to be provided from ARPA funds for two years. The net increase in the General Fund is estimated to be $100,000. Fire Response - The budget includes the addition of two firefighters with the use of $110,000 of ARPA and $110,000 of tax levy. This provides the initial funding for the phased approach to respond to increased demand and staffing challenges. ARPA funding would phase out over two years and additional need for staffing and funding would be evaluated over the next year. Capital Funds A draft CIP document is included for all capital for all funds. The Parks Renovation fund includes funding for 2022 from the General Fund surpluses. Future renovation plans are shown in the CIP in the unfunded pending projection report included. 6 The vehicle leasing program has been incorporated into the fleet replacement plan. The savings has improved the financial sustainability of the capital replacement fund. The Facilities Fund includes some capital items in the CIP; however, the facility study results will be used to update the plan in 2022 and funding strategies will be explored at that time. The Pavement Management Plan (PMP) fund is fully funded for the projects included in the CIP as discussed previously. The Transportation Infrastructure Management Fund is also in a financially sustainable position. DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS General Fund Items to Discuss Property Tax Levy Impact Financial Sustainability Progress CIP Document 5-year Financial Plans Summary all funds - Nov 2021 Property Tax Levy Impact 7 City Council Item November 22, 2021 Item 2022 Budget File No.Item No:A1 Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. -WORK SESSION Prepared By Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager SUGGESTED ACTION Discuss 2022 General Fund Budget and Levy Strategic Financial SustainabilityPriority SUMMARY The City Council and Staff have been reviewing and refining the 2022 General Fund budget and levy over the past several months. The budget hearing and final adoption of the 2022 General Fund budget and levy is scheduled for Monday, December 13, 2021. In terms of the items that have been part of the ongoing discussions, staff is recommending that the City Council move forward with the following for final consideration on December 13, 2021: 4.9% Levy Increase Add 2 FT Firefighters in 2022 $60,000 set aside for Fire staffing $50,000 budget contingency $110,000 ARPA funding Add Economic Development Manager 8 Property Tax Levy Impacts2022 Budget Change2022 Levy Impact % Change % Change % Change % Change %Beginning Levy $ 12,066,700 $ 12,663,200 $ 13,579,200 $ 14,325,200 $ 14,956,200 General FundEmployee Services 345,000 2.9%350,000 2.8%300,000 2.2%300,000 2.1%300,000 2.0%Current Expenses* 161,000 1.3%220,000 1.7%200,000 1.5%200,000 1.4%200,000 1.3%Total Expenses 506,000 4.2%570,000 4.5%500,000 3.7%500,000 3.5%500,000 3.3%Revenues net increase (other than tax levy)(200,000) ‐1.7%‐ 0.0%‐ 0.0%‐ 0.0%‐ 0.0%Current Service Level 306,000 2.5%570,000 4.5%500,000 3.7%500,000 3.5%500,000 3.3%Service Level Enhancement ‐‐ Increase fire response trend (2 firefighte110,000 220,000 1.7%110,000 0.8%20,000 0.1%20,000 0.1%ARPA funding ($110k phased out in 2024)Economic Development Manager 100,000 30,000 0.2%30,000 0.2%5,000 0.0%5,000 0.0%ARPA funding ($50k phased out 2023/2024)‐ New Fire & Economic Dev Initiatives 210,000 1.7%250,000 2.0%140,000 1.0%25,000 0.2%25,000 0.2%General Fund 516,000 4.3%820,000 6.5%640,000 4.7%525,000 3.7%525,000 3.5%Capital Plan IncreasesFleet & Equipment Capital Fund 40,000 50,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 Facilities Capital Fund 25,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Transportation Infrastructure Mgmt 11,500 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 Capital Project Funds 76,500 0.6%92,000 0.7%102,000 0.8%102,000 0.7%102,000 0.7%Debt Service 4,000 0.0%4,000 0.0%4,000 0.0%4,000 0.0%4,000 0.0%Proposed 2022 Tax Levy Increase (2023 Projected)596,500 4.9%916,000 7.2%746,000 5.5%631,000 4.4%631,000 4.2%Proposed Tax Levy12,663,200$ 13,579,200$ 14,325,200$ 14,956,200$ 15,587,200$ Future Capital Improvements being consideredPark Renovations ‐ build to annual average pay‐as‐you‐go 150,000 1.2% 150,000 1.1% 50,000 0.3% 50,000 0.3%Park Improvements & Facility Renovations would be funded by bondsFor example, debt service on $20m bonds for 20 years would be roughly $1.2m annually 600,000 4.4% 610,000 4.3%2026 Levy Impact2022 Levy ImpactFuture Projections2023 Levy Impact 2024 Levy Impact 2025 Levy Impact9 Financial Sustainability Progress…Successes!• Funded!• Pavement Management Plan•Storm water pond maintenance•Fair & equitable employee pay plan• Equipment replacement –new vehicles, less cost! •5 year financial plans• Positions & duties realigned In Process!• Facility study •Proactive economic development•Fire Plan ‐agile response to rapidly changing situations• Technology for Innovation•Meter replacements & monthly billingLooking forward and making plans• Investment planning for the future• Facilities•Parks•Fire plan phased additions•Growth challenges & opportunities10 Capital Improvement Program City of Chanhassen, MN FUNDING SOURCE SUMMARY 2022 thru 2026 TotalSource2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Capital Fund -Facilities 1,208,000139,000 392,000 225,000 220,000 232,000 Capital Fund -Park Renovation 400,000340,000 60,000 Capital Fund -PMP Assessments 9,376,0001,736,000 2,400,000 1,640,000 1,680,000 1,920,000 Capital Fund -PMP Fund 13,750,0002,790,000 2,830,000 2,650,000 2,810,000 2,670,000 Capital Fund -PMP MSA 4,944,000464,000 2,680,000 1,500,000 300,000 Capital Fund -TIM Transp Infr Mgmt 580,000112,000 114,000 116,000 118,000 120,000 Certificates of Indebtedness 1,625,000800,000 825,000 Debt -TIF Bonds 2,100,0002,100,000 ISF -Fleet Capital 3,189,500263,000 663,400 895,200 750,600 617,300 ISF -Fleet Leased 955,250354,950 91,000 274,300 194,000 41,000 ISF -Technology 305,000205,000 100,000 Other Agency - State Grant 2,200,0002,200,000 Other Agency Contribution 9,485,0005,560,000 3,925,000 SR Fund -Cable TV Franchise Fee 105,00075,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 SR Fund -Cemetery Fund 25,00025,000 Utility Fund -Sewer 6,795,500852,000 1,023,500 1,885,000 580,000 2,455,000 Utility Fund -Surface Wtr 7,545,5001,392,000 1,939,500 1,442,000 1,338,000 1,434,000 Utility Fund -Water 12,329,4001,173,000 2,340,500 1,487,000 1,022,000 6,306,900 Utillity Assessments -Developer 8,850,000950,000 7,900,000 9,920,950 23,103,900 19,199,500 8,722,600 24,821,200 85,768,150GRAND TOTAL Thursday, November 18, 2021 11 Capital Improvement Program City of Chanhassen, MN DEPARTMENT SUMMARY 2022 2026thru Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Department Facilities 1,299,500195,000 402,500 225,000 245,000 232,000 Fleet - Capital 5,239,400263,000 1,793,400 986,200 725,600 1,471,200 Fleet - Leased Vehicles 1,004,250354,950 91,000 323,300 194,000 41,000 Park Renovation 400,000340,000 60,000 Spec Revenue Fund Capital 130,000100,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Street Improvements 49,490,0006,400,000 16,920,000 13,890,000 5,815,000 6,465,000 Technology 585,000320,000 215,500 16,000 16,500 17,000 TIM Transportation Inf Mgmt 580,000112,000 114,000 116,000 118,000 120,000 Utiliities - Water 7,425,000546,000 1,441,500 411,000 495,500 4,531,000 Utilities - Sanitary Sewer 14,905,000590,000 380,000 2,470,000 325,000 11,140,000 Utilities - Surface Water Mgmt 4,710,000700,000 1,676,000 752,000 778,000 804,000 9,920,950 23,103,900 19,199,500 8,722,600 24,821,200 85,768,150TOTAL Thursday, November 18, 2021 12 Capital Improvement Program City of Chanhassen, MN PROJECTS BY CATEGORY AND DEPARTMENT 2022 2026thru Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Department Category Facilities Fire 35,000 35,000Fire Station 1 Pavement & Drainage Repairs MBFire-047 35,000 35,000Sub-Total General Government Buildings 100,000 50,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 750,000Deferred Maintenance Allowance - All MB-048 300,000 300,000City Hall Roof Replacement MBCH-033 10,000 10,000Senior Center/Maple Room Kitchen Flooring Replace MBCH-045 10,000 10,000Senior Center / Maple Room Carpet Replacement MBCH-046 10,000 11,000 21,000Library Building Facility Maintenance MBLib-051 100,000 360,000 200,000 220,000 211,000 1,091,000Sub-Total Public Works 60,000 60,000PW Facility - Fuel island canopy MBPW-042 17,500 17,500PW Facility - Fuel Tank Monitoring Sytem Upgrade MBPW-043 25,000 25,000PW Facility - Salt Shed Canvas Cover Replacement MBPW-044 21,000 21,000PW Facility Maintenance MBPW-050 60,000 17,500 25,000 21,000 123,500Sub-Total Recreation 25,000 25,000 50,000Recreation Center Revitalization Project MBRec-140 25,000 25,000 50,000Sub-Total 195,000 402,500 225,000 245,000 232,000 1,299,500Department Total: Fleet - Capital Fire 825,000 825,000Fire Pumper Truck - 2007 Truck F-209 800,000 800,000Fire Pumper Truck - 1996 Toyne F-211 35,000 35,000Grass Response Rig - 2005 Polaris Ranger 4x4 F-231 23,500 23,500Boat Rescue - 2006 Dura Craft Boat/Motor/Trailer F-232 835,000 23,500 825,000 1,683,500Sub-Total Park Maintenance 90,000 90,000Dump Truck to replace 2008 Ford F450 4x4 w/Plow F-406 114,000 114,000Mower - 2009 Toro Groundsmaster 5900 F-450 86,000 86,000Mower - 2012 Toro Groundsmaster 4000 F-451 118,000 118,000Mower - 2015 Toro Groundsmaster 5900 F-452 83,000 83,000Mower - 2016 Toro Grounsmaster 4000-D F-456 Thursday, November 18, 2021 13 Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Department Category 90,000 90,000Tractor - 2001 John Deere 5520 F-471 22,000 22,000Tractor 2001 John Deere 455 (replace w/ ABI)F-472 43,000 43,000Tractor - John Deere 4710 F-473 95,000 95,000Tractor w/ Snowblower 2004 John Deere 5520 F-474 15,000 15,000Tractor Snowblower for F-471 Erskine 1996 F-480 9,900 9,900Weed Sprayer F-4XX 305,000 104,900 230,000 126,000 765,900Sub-Total PW - Streets 7,400 7,400Trailer - 2009 Felling Tandem Axel F-01A 12,300 12,300Trailer - 2009 Felling Tandem Axel F-01B 7,600 7,600Trailer - 2010 Felling Tandem Axel F-01F 40,000 40,000Trailer - 2000 Towmaster Tri Axel F-01G 30,000 30,000Portable Message Boards F-100B 10,000 10,000Breaker Bar Attachment F-100C 15,000 15,000Compacting attachment for exavator F-100D 227,300 227,300Streets Dump/Plow 2006 Sterling LT9500 F-102 295,000 295,000Streets Dump/Plow 2007 Sterling LT9500 F-103 330,000 330,000Streets Dump/Plow 2008 Mack Tandem Axle GU713 F-104 235,000 235,000Streets Dump/Plow Truck 2001 Sterling L8513 F-127 242,000 242,000Streets Dump/Plow 2003 Sterling L8513 F-128 32,000 32,000Compressor 1993 Sullair F-137 121,300 121,300Tractor - 2006 John Deere w/ Broom F-141 154,500 154,5001989 Snowblower attachment for Loader F-142 286,700 286,700Streets Dump/Plow - Replace Loader 544G F-146 59,000 59,000Vibratory Compactor 1994 Cat F-152 46,000 46,000Hot Box with Asphalt Premix Heater F-158 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 140,000Annual Skid Loader Trade In F-skid 263,000 323,400 741,300 472,100 491,300 2,291,100Sub-Total Utilities - SWMP 20,000 20,000SteamerF-100A 310,000 310,000Street Sweeper 2003 Elgin F-136 330,000 330,000Sub-Total Utilities - W&S Capital Equipment 140,000 140,000Pickup - 2012 Ford F450 with crane F-302 28,900 28,900Scrubber - 2006 Tennant F-396 140,000 28,900 168,900Sub-Total 263,000 1,793,400 986,200 725,600 1,471,200 5,239,400Department Total: Fleet - Leased Vehicles CD - Inspections 31,000 31,000Pickup 2007 GMC Canyon F-607 32,000 32,000Pickup 2008 GMC Canyon F-611 32,950 32,950Pickup 2008 GMC Canyon F-612 95,950 95,950Sub-Total CD - Planning 33,000 33,000Van - 2010 Grand Caravan F-802 33,000 33,000Sub-Total Thursday, November 18, 2021 14 Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Department Category Fire 74,150 74,150SUV - 2015 Chev Tahoe F-202 65,000 65,000SUV - 2013 Chev Tahoe F-203 74,150 74,150SUV - 2015 Chev Tahoe F-204 40,000 40,000Pickup 2016 GMC Sierra (formerly CSO)F-702 105,000 148,300 253,300Sub-Total Fleet Leased 35,000 35,000Pickup 2002 Chev 1/2ton 4x4 F-155 35,000 35,000Sub-Total Park Maintenance 46,000 46,000Pickup 2004 Chev 4x4 w/Plow F-401 41,000 41,000Pickup 2004 Chev 4x4 w/Plow F-402 46,000 46,000Pickup 2008 Chev 4x4 w/Plow F-408 41,000 41,000Pickup - 2015 Chev Silverado K2500 F-409 47,000 47,000Pickup 2010 GMC Sierra 4x4 w/Plow F-411 50,000 50,000Pickup 2012 Chev 4x4 w/Plow F-419 50,000 50,000Pickup 2012 Chev 4x4 w/Plow F-420 87,000 93,000 100,000 41,000 321,000Sub-Total PW - Engineering 32,000 32,000Pickup - 2010 Chev Silverado F-501 32,000 32,000Sub-Total PW - Streets 27,000 27,000Sedan - 2010 Chev Impala 4 door F-001 49,000 49,000Pickup - 2010 GMC Sierra 2500 w plow F-131 50,000 50,000Pickup w/plow - 2013 chev 1500 F-132 44,000 44,000Pickup -2013 2500 4x4 F-134 27,000 49,000 94,000 170,000Sub-Total Utilities - W&S Capital Equipment 31,000 31,000SUV - 2017 Chevrolet Equinox F-307 33,000 33,000Pickup - 2013 GMC Sierra F-308 64,000 64,000Sub-Total 354,950 91,000 323,300 194,000 41,000 1,004,250Department Total: Park Renovation Park Improvements 90,000 90,000Tennis Court Refurbishment P-072 150,000 150,000N Lotus Lake Park Hockey Rink PR-2022A 15,000 15,000Meadow Green & Rice Marsh Backstops/Benches PR-2022C 85,000 85,000Roundhouse Park Playground PR-2022D 60,000 60,000Lake Ann Lake Side Pavilion Roof Replacement PR-2023R 340,000 60,000 400,000Sub-Total 340,000 60,000 400,000Department Total: Spec Revenue Fund Capital Cemetery 25,000 25,000Cemetery Driveway Improvements CEM-001 Thursday, November 18, 2021 15 Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Department Category 25,000 25,000Sub-Total Communications 75,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 105,000Audio/Visual Equipment T-026 75,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 105,000Sub-Total 100,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 130,000Department Total: Street Improvements Street Improvements 5,075,000 5,225,000 5,375,000 5,525,000 5,675,000 26,875,000Annual Street Improvement Program ST-012 5,625,000 5,625,000 11,250,000MSA-Galpin Blvd Imp (Hwy 5 N to City limits)ST-040 160,000 160,000MSA-TH 41 and 82nd Street Signal ST-042 320,000 200,000 520,000Downtown Traffic Signals ST-043 875,000 875,000MSA Roadway Improvements - Lake Lucy Road ST-045 4,000,000 4,000,000MSA Roadway Improvements - Market Blvd ST-048 700,000 700,000MSA Street Imprv - Lake Drive East/Great Plains ST-049 1,500,000 1,500,000Crimson Bay Road/Dogwood Road Connection ST-050 2,800,000 2,800,000TH41 MMSW Access Improvements ST-051 450,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 810,000Bluff Creek Boulevard Extension ST-052 6,400,000 16,920,000 13,890,000 5,815,000 6,465,000 49,490,000Sub-Total 6,400,000 16,920,000 13,890,000 5,815,000 6,465,000 49,490,000Department Total: Technology Technology 15,000 15,500 16,000 16,500 17,000 80,000Utility Fiber Connectivity - Sewer MBU-041 50,000 50,000Telecommunication Purchases/Upgrades T-014 55,000 55,000Storage Area Network (SAN)T-081 100,000 100,000 200,000Finance Software Replacement T-177 100,000 100,000 200,000Utility Billing Software Replacement T-177UB 320,000 215,500 16,000 16,500 17,000 585,000Sub-Total 320,000 215,500 16,000 16,500 17,000 585,000Department Total: TIM Transportation Inf Mgmt Transportation Maintenance 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 200,000ADA Transition Plan Improvements ST-047 72,000 74,000 76,000 78,000 80,000 380,000Trails & Parking Lots Pavement Mgmt TIM-02 112,000 114,000 116,000 118,000 120,000 580,000Sub-Total 112,000 114,000 116,000 118,000 120,000 580,000Department Total: Utiliities - Water Technology 15,000 15,500 16,000 16,500 17,000 80,000Utility Fiber Connectivity - Water Facilities MBU-040 15,000 15,500 16,000 16,500 17,000 80,000Sub-Total Utilities - Water 121,000 86,000 43,000 115,000 138,000 503,000Well Rehabilitation Program W-032 2,600,000 2,600,000Low Zone 1 MG Storage Tank W-046 Thursday, November 18, 2021 16 Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Department Category 1,400,000 1,400,000Well #16 W-059 250,000 260,000 270,000 280,000 290,000 1,350,000Trunk Watermain Maintenance W-065 1,000,000 1,000,000TH5 Watermain - AATP W-067 40,000 80,000 82,000 84,000 86,000 372,000Water Treatment Plant Bldg & Equip W-068 120,000 120,000WTP Mechanical Improvements W-069 531,000 1,426,000 395,000 479,000 4,514,000 7,345,000Sub-Total 546,000 1,441,500 411,000 495,500 4,531,000 7,425,000Department Total: Utilities - Sanitary Sewer Utilities - Sewer 200,000 210,000 220,000 230,000 240,000 1,100,000Inflow and Infiltration Abatement SS-012 190,000 170,000 150,000 95,000 100,000 705,000Sanitary Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Program SS-017 1,900,000 1,900,0002010 MUSA Sanitary Lift Station SS-020 10,800,000 10,800,000Lower Bluff Creek Trunk Utility Improvements SS-024 200,000 200,000 400,000Lift Station Access Improvements SS-027 590,000 380,000 2,470,000 325,000 11,140,000 14,905,000Sub-Total 590,000 380,000 2,470,000 325,000 11,140,000 14,905,000Department Total: Utilities - Surface Water Mgmt Utilities - SWMP 675,000 100,000 725,000 750,000 775,000 3,025,000Stormwater Pond Improvements SWMP-032 500,000 500,000Lotus Lake Channels & Outfall Improvements SWMP-046 600,000 600,000Upper Riley Creek Channel Stabilization SWMP-048 350,000 350,000Downtown Water Reuse Project SWMP-057 25,000 26,000 27,000 28,000 29,000 135,000Stormwater Management Partnership Program SWMP-059 100,000 100,000Red Cedar Point Stormwater Improvements SWMP-061 700,000 1,676,000 752,000 778,000 804,000 4,710,000Sub-Total 700,000 1,676,000 752,000 778,000 804,000 4,710,000Department Total: 9,920,950 23,103,900 19,199,500 8,722,600 24,821,200 85,768,150GRAND TOTAL Thursday, November 18, 2021 17 Capital Improvement Program City of Chanhassen, MN PROJECTS BY DEPARTMENT 2022 2026thru Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Department Project # Priority Facilities MB-048 750,000100,000 50,000 200,000 200,000 200,000Deferred Maintenance Allowance - All n/a MBCH-033 300,000300,000City Hall Roof Replacement n/a MBCH-045 10,00010,000Senior Center/Maple Room Kitchen Flooring Replace n/a MBCH-046 10,00010,000Senior Center / Maple Room Carpet Replacement n/a MBFire-047 35,00035,000Fire Station 1 Pavement & Drainage Repairs n/a MBLib-051 21,00010,000 11,000Library Building Facility Maintenance n/a MBPW-042 60,00060,000PW Facility - Fuel island canopy n/a MBPW-043 17,50017,500PW Facility - Fuel Tank Monitoring Sytem Upgrade n/a MBPW-044 25,00025,000PW Facility - Salt Shed Canvas Cover Replacement n/a MBPW-050 21,00021,000PW Facility Maintenance n/a MBRec-140 50,00025,000 25,000Recreation Center Revitalization Project n/a 1,299,500195,000 402,500 225,000 245,000 232,000Facilities Total Fleet - Capital F-01A 7,4007,400Trailer - 2009 Felling Tandem Axel n/a F-01B 12,30012,300Trailer - 2009 Felling Tandem Axel n/a F-01F 7,6007,600Trailer - 2010 Felling Tandem Axel n/a F-01G 40,00040,000Trailer - 2000 Towmaster Tri Axel n/a F-100A 20,00020,000Steamer n/a F-100B 30,00030,000Portable Message Boards n/a F-100C 10,00010,000Breaker Bar Attachment n/a F-100D 15,00015,000Compacting attachment for exavator n/a F-102 227,300227,300Streets Dump/Plow 2006 Sterling LT9500 n/a F-103 295,000295,000Streets Dump/Plow 2007 Sterling LT9500 n/a F-104 330,000330,000Streets Dump/Plow 2008 Mack Tandem Axle GU713 n/a F-127 235,000235,000Streets Dump/Plow Truck 2001 Sterling L8513 n/a F-128 242,000242,000Streets Dump/Plow 2003 Sterling L8513 n/a F-136 310,000310,000Street Sweeper 2003 Elgin n/a F-137 32,00032,000Compressor 1993 Sullair n/a F-141 121,300121,300Tractor - 2006 John Deere w/ Broom n/a F-142 154,500154,5001989 Snowblower attachment for Loader n/a F-146 286,700286,700Streets Dump/Plow - Replace Loader 544G n/a F-152 59,00059,000Vibratory Compactor 1994 Cat n/a F-158 46,00046,000Hot Box with Asphalt Premix Heater n/a F-209 825,000825,000Fire Pumper Truck - 2007 Truck n/a F-211 800,000800,000Fire Pumper Truck - 1996 Toyne n/a F-231 35,00035,000Grass Response Rig - 2005 Polaris Ranger 4x4 n/a F-232 23,50023,500Boat Rescue - 2006 Dura Craft Boat/Motor/Trailer n/a F-302 140,000140,000Pickup - 2012 Ford F450 with crane n/a F-396 28,90028,900Scrubber - 2006 Tennant n/a F-406 90,00090,000Dump Truck to replace 2008 Ford F450 4x4 w/Plow n/a F-450 114,000114,000Mower - 2009 Toro Groundsmaster 5900 n/a F-451 86,00086,000Mower - 2012 Toro Groundsmaster 4000 n/a F-452 118,000118,000Mower - 2015 Toro Groundsmaster 5900 n/a Thursday, November 18, 2021 18 Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Department Project # Priority F-456 83,00083,000Mower - 2016 Toro Grounsmaster 4000-D n/a F-471 90,00090,000Tractor - 2001 John Deere 5520 n/a F-472 22,00022,000Tractor 2001 John Deere 455 (replace w/ ABI) n/a F-473 43,00043,000Tractor - John Deere 4710 n/a F-474 95,00095,000Tractor w/ Snowblower 2004 John Deere 5520 n/a F-480 15,00015,000Tractor Snowblower for F-471 Erskine 1996 n/a F-4XX 9,9009,900Weed Sprayer n/a F-skid 140,00028,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000Annual Skid Loader Trade In n/a 5,239,400263,000 1,793,400 986,200 725,600 1,471,200Fleet - Capital Total Fleet - Leased Vehicles F-001 27,00027,000Sedan - 2010 Chev Impala 4 door n/a F-131 49,00049,000Pickup - 2010 GMC Sierra 2500 w plow n/a F-132 50,00050,000Pickup w/plow - 2013 chev 1500 n/a F-134 44,00044,000Pickup -2013 2500 4x4 n/a F-155 35,00035,000Pickup 2002 Chev 1/2ton 4x4 n/a F-202 74,15074,150SUV - 2015 Chev Tahoe n/a F-203 65,00065,000SUV - 2013 Chev Tahoe n/a F-204 74,15074,150SUV - 2015 Chev Tahoe n/a F-307 31,00031,000SUV - 2017 Chevrolet Equinox n/a F-308 33,00033,000Pickup - 2013 GMC Sierra n/a F-401 46,00046,000Pickup 2004 Chev 4x4 w/Plow n/a F-402 41,00041,000Pickup 2004 Chev 4x4 w/Plow n/a F-408 46,00046,000Pickup 2008 Chev 4x4 w/Plow n/a F-409 41,00041,000Pickup - 2015 Chev Silverado K2500 n/a F-411 47,00047,000Pickup 2010 GMC Sierra 4x4 w/Plow n/a F-419 50,00050,000Pickup 2012 Chev 4x4 w/Plow n/a F-420 50,00050,000Pickup 2012 Chev 4x4 w/Plow n/a F-501 32,00032,000Pickup - 2010 Chev Silverado n/a F-607 31,00031,000Pickup 2007 GMC Canyon n/a F-611 32,00032,000Pickup 2008 GMC Canyon n/a F-612 32,95032,950Pickup 2008 GMC Canyon n/a F-702 40,00040,000Pickup 2016 GMC Sierra (formerly CSO) n/a F-802 33,00033,000Van - 2010 Grand Caravan n/a 1,004,250354,950 91,000 323,300 194,000 41,000Fleet - Leased Vehicles Total Park Renovation P-072 90,00090,000Tennis Court Refurbishment n/a PR-2022A 150,000150,000N Lotus Lake Park Hockey Rink n/a PR-2022C 15,00015,000Meadow Green & Rice Marsh Backstops/Benches n/a PR-2022D 85,00085,000Roundhouse Park Playground n/a PR-2023R 60,00060,000Lake Ann Lake Side Pavilion Roof Replacement n/a 400,000340,000 60,000Park Renovation Total Spec Revenue Fund Capital CEM-001 25,00025,000Cemetery Driveway Improvements n/a T-026 105,00075,000 10,000 10,000 10,000Audio/Visual Equipment n/a 130,000100,000 10,000 10,000 10,000Spec Revenue Fund Capital Total Street Improvements ST-012 26,875,0005,075,000 5,225,000 5,375,000 5,525,000 5,675,000Annual Street Improvement Program n/a Thursday, November 18, 2021 19 Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Department Project # Priority ST-040 11,250,0005,625,000 5,625,000MSA-Galpin Blvd Imp (Hwy 5 N to City limits) n/a ST-042 160,000160,000MSA-TH 41 and 82nd Street Signal n/a ST-043 520,000320,000 200,000Downtown Traffic Signals n/a ST-045 875,000875,000MSA Roadway Improvements - Lake Lucy Road n/a ST-048 4,000,0004,000,000MSA Roadway Improvements - Market Blvd n/a ST-049 700,000700,000MSA Street Imprv - Lake Drive East/Great Plains n/a ST-050 1,500,0001,500,000Crimson Bay Road/Dogwood Road Connection n/a ST-051 2,800,0002,800,000TH41 MMSW Access Improvements n/a ST-052 810,000450,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000Bluff Creek Boulevard Extension n/a 49,490,0006,400,000 16,920,000 13,890,000 5,815,000 6,465,000Street Improvements Total Technology MBU-041 80,00015,000 15,500 16,000 16,500 17,000Utility Fiber Connectivity - Sewer n/a T-014 50,00050,000Telecommunication Purchases/Upgrades n/a T-081 55,00055,000Storage Area Network (SAN) n/a T-177 200,000100,000 100,000Finance Software Replacement n/a T-177UB 200,000100,000 100,000Utility Billing Software Replacement n/a 585,000320,000 215,500 16,000 16,500 17,000Technology Total TIM Transportation Inf Mgmt ST-047 200,00040,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000ADA Transition Plan Improvements n/a TIM-02 380,00072,000 74,000 76,000 78,000 80,000Trails & Parking Lots Pavement Mgmt n/a 580,000112,000 114,000 116,000 118,000 120,000TIM Transportation Inf Mgmt Total Utiliities - Water MBU-040 80,00015,000 15,500 16,000 16,500 17,000Utility Fiber Connectivity - Water Facilities n/a W-032 503,000121,000 86,000 43,000 115,000 138,000Well Rehabilitation Program n/a W-046 2,600,0002,600,000Low Zone 1 MG Storage Tank n/a W-059 1,400,0001,400,000Well #16 n/a W-065 1,350,000250,000 260,000 270,000 280,000 290,000Trunk Watermain Maintenance n/a W-067 1,000,0001,000,000TH5 Watermain - AATP n/a W-068 372,00040,000 80,000 82,000 84,000 86,000Water Treatment Plant Bldg & Equip n/a W-069 120,000120,000WTP Mechanical Improvements n/a 7,425,000546,000 1,441,500 411,000 495,500 4,531,000Utiliities - Water Total Utilities - Sanitary Sewer SS-012 1,100,000200,000 210,000 220,000 230,000 240,000Inflow and Infiltration Abatement n/a SS-017 705,000190,000 170,000 150,000 95,000 100,000Sanitary Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Program n/a SS-020 1,900,0001,900,0002010 MUSA Sanitary Lift Station n/a SS-024 10,800,00010,800,000Lower Bluff Creek Trunk Utility Improvements n/a SS-027 400,000200,000 200,000Lift Station Access Improvements n/a 14,905,000590,000 380,000 2,470,000 325,000 11,140,000Utilities - Sanitary Sewer Total Utilities - Surface Water Mgmt SWMP-032 3,025,000675,000 100,000 725,000 750,000 775,000Stormwater Pond Improvements n/a SWMP-046 500,000500,000Lotus Lake Channels & Outfall Improvements n/a SWMP-048 600,000600,000Upper Riley Creek Channel Stabilization n/a SWMP-057 350,000350,000Downtown Water Reuse Project n/a SWMP-059 135,00025,000 26,000 27,000 28,000 29,000Stormwater Management Partnership Program n/a SWMP-061 100,000100,000Red Cedar Point Stormwater Improvements n/a Thursday, November 18, 2021 20 Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Department Project # Priority 4,710,000700,000 1,676,000 752,000 778,000 804,000Utilities - Surface Water Mgmt Total GRAND TOTAL 85,768,1509,920,950 23,103,900 19,199,500 8,722,600 24,821,200 Thursday, November 18, 2021 21 Capital Improvement Program City of Chanhassen, MN PROJECTS BY FUNDING SOURCE 2022 2026thru TotalSource Project # Priority 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Capital Fund -Facilities MB-048 750,000100,000 50,000 200,000 200,000 200,000Deferred Maintenance Allowance - All n/a MBCH-033 300,000300,000City Hall Roof Replacement n/a MBCH-045 10,00010,000Senior Center/Maple Room Kitchen Flooring Replace n/a MBCH-046 10,00010,000Senior Center / Maple Room Carpet Replacement n/a MBFire-047 15,00015,000Fire Station 1 Pavement & Drainage Repairs n/a MBLib-051 21,00010,000 11,000Library Building Facility Maintenance n/a MBPW-042 24,00024,000PW Facility - Fuel island canopy n/a MBPW-043 7,0007,000PW Facility - Fuel Tank Monitoring Sytem Upgrade n/a MBPW-050 21,00021,000PW Facility Maintenance n/a MBRec-140 50,00025,000 25,000Recreation Center Revitalization Project n/a 1,208,000139,000 392,000 225,000 220,000 232,000Capital Fund -Facilities Total Capital Fund -Park Renovation P-072 90,00090,000Tennis Court Refurbishment n/a PR-2022A 150,000150,000N Lotus Lake Park Hockey Rink n/a PR-2022C 15,00015,000Meadow Green & Rice Marsh Backstops/Benches n/a PR-2022D 85,00085,000Roundhouse Park Playground n/a PR-2023R 60,00060,000Lake Ann Lake Side Pavilion Roof Replacement n/a 400,000340,000 60,000Capital Fund -Park Renovation Total Capital Fund -PMP Assessments ST-012 8,200,0001,560,000 1,600,000 1,640,000 1,680,000 1,720,000Annual Street Improvement Program n/a ST-045 176,000176,000MSA Roadway Improvements - Lake Lucy Road n/a ST-048 680,000680,000MSA Roadway Improvements - Market Blvd n/a ST-049 200,000200,000MSA Street Imprv - Lake Drive East/Great Plains n/a ST-050 120,000120,000Crimson Bay Road/Dogwood Road Connection n/a 9,376,0001,736,000 2,400,000 1,640,000 1,680,000 1,920,000Capital Fund -PMP Assessments Total Capital Fund -PMP Fund ST-012 12,300,0002,340,000 2,400,000 2,460,000 2,520,000 2,580,000Annual Street Improvement Program n/a ST-043 360,000160,000 200,000Downtown Traffic Signals n/a ST-050 180,000180,000Crimson Bay Road/Dogwood Road Connection n/a ST-051 100,000100,000TH41 MMSW Access Improvements n/a ST-052 810,000450,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000Bluff Creek Boulevard Extension n/a 13,750,0002,790,000 2,830,000 2,650,000 2,810,000 2,670,000Capital Fund -PMP Fund Total Capital Fund -PMP MSA ST-040 3,000,0001,500,000 1,500,000MSA-Galpin Blvd Imp (Hwy 5 N to City limits) n/a ST-042 160,000160,000MSA-TH 41 and 82nd Street Signal n/a Thursday, November 18, 2021 22 TotalSource Project # Priority 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 ST-045 464,000464,000MSA Roadway Improvements - Lake Lucy Road n/a ST-048 1,020,0001,020,000MSA Roadway Improvements - Market Blvd n/a ST-049 300,000300,000MSA Street Imprv - Lake Drive East/Great Plains n/a 4,944,000464,000 2,680,000 1,500,000 300,000Capital Fund -PMP MSA Total Capital Fund -TIM Transp Infr Mgmt ST-047 200,00040,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000ADA Transition Plan Improvements n/a TIM-02 380,00072,000 74,000 76,000 78,000 80,000Trails & Parking Lots Pavement Mgmt n/a 580,000112,000 114,000 116,000 118,000 120,000Capital Fund -TIM Transp Infr Mgmt Total Certificates of Indebtedness F-209 825,000825,000Fire Pumper Truck - 2007 Truck n/a F-211 800,000800,000Fire Pumper Truck - 1996 Toyne n/a 1,625,000800,000 825,000Certificates of Indebtedness Total Debt -TIF Bonds ST-048 2,100,0002,100,000MSA Roadway Improvements - Market Blvd n/a 2,100,0002,100,000Debt -TIF Bonds Total ISF -Fleet Capital F-01A 7,4007,400Trailer - 2009 Felling Tandem Axel n/a F-01B 12,30012,300Trailer - 2009 Felling Tandem Axel n/a F-01F 7,6007,600Trailer - 2010 Felling Tandem Axel n/a F-01G 40,00040,000Trailer - 2000 Towmaster Tri Axel n/a F-100B 30,00030,000Portable Message Boards n/a F-100C 10,00010,000Breaker Bar Attachment n/a F-100D 15,00015,000Compacting attachment for exavator n/a F-102 227,300227,300Streets Dump/Plow 2006 Sterling LT9500 n/a F-103 295,000295,000Streets Dump/Plow 2007 Sterling LT9500 n/a F-104 330,000330,000Streets Dump/Plow 2008 Mack Tandem Axle GU713 n/a F-127 235,000235,000Streets Dump/Plow Truck 2001 Sterling L8513 n/a F-128 242,000242,000Streets Dump/Plow 2003 Sterling L8513 n/a F-131 49,00049,000Pickup - 2010 GMC Sierra 2500 w plow n/a F-137 32,00032,000Compressor 1993 Sullair n/a F-141 121,300121,300Tractor - 2006 John Deere w/ Broom n/a F-142 154,500154,5001989 Snowblower attachment for Loader n/a F-146 286,700286,700Streets Dump/Plow - Replace Loader 544G n/a F-152 59,00059,000Vibratory Compactor 1994 Cat n/a F-158 46,00046,000Hot Box with Asphalt Premix Heater n/a F-231 35,00035,000Grass Response Rig - 2005 Polaris Ranger 4x4 n/a F-232 23,50023,500Boat Rescue - 2006 Dura Craft Boat/Motor/Trailer n/a F-406 90,00090,000Dump Truck to replace 2008 Ford F450 4x4 w/Plow n/a F-450 114,000114,000Mower - 2009 Toro Groundsmaster 5900 n/a F-451 86,00086,000Mower - 2012 Toro Groundsmaster 4000 n/a F-452 118,000118,000Mower - 2015 Toro Groundsmaster 5900 n/a F-456 83,00083,000Mower - 2016 Toro Grounsmaster 4000-D n/a F-471 90,00090,000Tractor - 2001 John Deere 5520 n/a F-472 22,00022,000Tractor 2001 John Deere 455 (replace w/ ABI) n/a F-473 43,00043,000Tractor - John Deere 4710 n/a Thursday, November 18, 2021 23 TotalSource Project # Priority 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 F-474 95,00095,000Tractor w/ Snowblower 2004 John Deere 5520 n/a F-480 15,00015,000Tractor Snowblower for F-471 Erskine 1996 n/a F-4XX 9,9009,900Weed Sprayer n/a F-skid 140,00028,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000Annual Skid Loader Trade In n/a MBPW-044 25,00025,000PW Facility - Salt Shed Canvas Cover Replacement n/a 3,189,500263,000 663,400 895,200 750,600 617,300ISF -Fleet Capital Total ISF -Fleet Leased F-001 27,00027,000Sedan - 2010 Chev Impala 4 door n/a F-132 50,00050,000Pickup w/plow - 2013 chev 1500 n/a F-134 44,00044,000Pickup -2013 2500 4x4 n/a F-155 35,00035,000Pickup 2002 Chev 1/2ton 4x4 n/a F-202 74,15074,150SUV - 2015 Chev Tahoe n/a F-203 65,00065,000SUV - 2013 Chev Tahoe n/a F-204 74,15074,150SUV - 2015 Chev Tahoe n/a F-307 31,00031,000SUV - 2017 Chevrolet Equinox n/a F-308 33,00033,000Pickup - 2013 GMC Sierra n/a F-401 46,00046,000Pickup 2004 Chev 4x4 w/Plow n/a F-402 41,00041,000Pickup 2004 Chev 4x4 w/Plow n/a F-408 46,00046,000Pickup 2008 Chev 4x4 w/Plow n/a F-409 41,00041,000Pickup - 2015 Chev Silverado K2500 n/a F-411 47,00047,000Pickup 2010 GMC Sierra 4x4 w/Plow n/a F-419 50,00050,000Pickup 2012 Chev 4x4 w/Plow n/a F-420 50,00050,000Pickup 2012 Chev 4x4 w/Plow n/a F-501 32,00032,000Pickup - 2010 Chev Silverado n/a F-607 31,00031,000Pickup 2007 GMC Canyon n/a F-611 32,00032,000Pickup 2008 GMC Canyon n/a F-612 32,95032,950Pickup 2008 GMC Canyon n/a F-702 40,00040,000Pickup 2016 GMC Sierra (formerly CSO) n/a F-802 33,00033,000Van - 2010 Grand Caravan n/a 955,250354,950 91,000 274,300 194,000 41,000ISF -Fleet Leased Total ISF -Technology T-014 50,00050,000Telecommunication Purchases/Upgrades n/a T-081 55,00055,000Storage Area Network (SAN) n/a T-177 200,000100,000 100,000Finance Software Replacement n/a 305,000205,000 100,000ISF -Technology Total Other Agency - State Grant ST-051 2,200,0002,200,000TH41 MMSW Access Improvements n/a 2,200,0002,200,000Other Agency - State Grant Total Other Agency Contribution SS-027 25,00025,000Lift Station Access Improvements n/a ST-040 7,000,0003,500,000 3,500,000MSA-Galpin Blvd Imp (Hwy 5 N to City limits) n/a ST-043 160,000160,000Downtown Traffic Signals n/a ST-050 700,000700,000Crimson Bay Road/Dogwood Road Connection n/a ST-051 400,000400,000TH41 MMSW Access Improvements n/a SWMP-046 450,000450,000Lotus Lake Channels & Outfall Improvements n/a Thursday, November 18, 2021 24 TotalSource Project # Priority 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 SWMP-057 250,000250,000Downtown Water Reuse Project n/a W-067 500,000500,000TH5 Watermain - AATP n/a 9,485,0005,560,000 3,925,000Other Agency Contribution Total SR Fund -Cable TV Franchise Fee T-026 105,00075,000 10,000 10,000 10,000Audio/Visual Equipment n/a 105,00075,000 10,000 10,000 10,000SR Fund -Cable TV Franchise Fee Total SR Fund -Cemetery Fund CEM-001 25,00025,000Cemetery Driveway Improvements n/a 25,00025,000SR Fund -Cemetery Fund Total Utility Fund -Sewer F-302 70,00070,000Pickup - 2012 Ford F450 with crane n/a MBPW-042 12,00012,000PW Facility - Fuel island canopy n/a MBPW-043 3,5003,500PW Facility - Fuel Tank Monitoring Sytem Upgrade n/a SS-012 1,100,000200,000 210,000 220,000 230,000 240,000Inflow and Infiltration Abatement n/a SS-017 705,000190,000 170,000 150,000 95,000 100,000Sanitary Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Program n/a SS-020 950,000950,0002010 MUSA Sanitary Lift Station n/a SS-024 1,800,0001,800,000Lower Bluff Creek Trunk Utility Improvements n/a SS-027 250,000125,000 125,000Lift Station Access Improvements n/a ST-012 1,225,000225,000 235,000 245,000 255,000 265,000Annual Street Improvement Program n/a ST-040 250,000125,000 125,000MSA-Galpin Blvd Imp (Hwy 5 N to City limits) n/a ST-045 60,00060,000MSA Roadway Improvements - Lake Lucy Road n/a ST-048 40,00040,000MSA Roadway Improvements - Market Blvd n/a ST-049 50,00050,000MSA Street Imprv - Lake Drive East/Great Plains n/a ST-050 200,000200,000Crimson Bay Road/Dogwood Road Connection n/a T-177UB 80,00040,000 40,000Utility Billing Software Replacement n/a 6,795,500852,000 1,023,500 1,885,000 580,000 2,455,000Utility Fund -Sewer Total Utility Fund -Surface Wtr F-100A 20,00020,000Steamer n/a F-136 310,000310,000Street Sweeper 2003 Elgin n/a MBFire-047 20,00020,000Fire Station 1 Pavement & Drainage Repairs n/a MBPW-042 12,00012,000PW Facility - Fuel island canopy n/a MBPW-043 3,5003,500PW Facility - Fuel Tank Monitoring Sytem Upgrade n/a SS-027 125,00075,000 50,000Lift Station Access Improvements n/a ST-012 2,650,000500,000 520,000 540,000 560,000 530,000Annual Street Improvement Program n/a ST-045 65,00065,000MSA Roadway Improvements - Lake Lucy Road n/a ST-048 40,00040,000MSA Roadway Improvements - Market Blvd n/a ST-049 100,000100,000MSA Street Imprv - Lake Drive East/Great Plains n/a ST-050 100,000100,000Crimson Bay Road/Dogwood Road Connection n/a ST-051 100,000100,000TH41 MMSW Access Improvements n/a SWMP-032 3,025,000675,000 100,000 725,000 750,000 775,000Stormwater Pond Improvements n/a SWMP-046 50,00050,000Lotus Lake Channels & Outfall Improvements n/a SWMP-048 600,000600,000Upper Riley Creek Channel Stabilization n/a SWMP-057 50,00050,000Downtown Water Reuse Project n/a SWMP-059 135,00025,000 26,000 27,000 28,000 29,000Stormwater Management Partnership Program n/a SWMP-061 100,000100,000Red Cedar Point Stormwater Improvements n/a Thursday, November 18, 2021 25 TotalSource Project # Priority 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 T-177UB 40,00020,000 20,000Utility Billing Software Replacement n/a 7,545,5001,392,000 1,939,500 1,442,000 1,338,000 1,434,000Utility Fund -Surface Wtr Total Utility Fund -Water F-302 70,00070,000Pickup - 2012 Ford F450 with crane n/a F-396 28,90028,900Scrubber - 2006 Tennant n/a MBPW-042 12,00012,000PW Facility - Fuel island canopy n/a MBPW-043 3,5003,500PW Facility - Fuel Tank Monitoring Sytem Upgrade n/a MBU-040 80,00015,000 15,500 16,000 16,500 17,000Utility Fiber Connectivity - Water Facilities n/a MBU-041 80,00015,000 15,500 16,000 16,500 17,000Utility Fiber Connectivity - Sewer n/a SS-024 1,100,0001,100,000Lower Bluff Creek Trunk Utility Improvements n/a ST-012 2,500,000450,000 470,000 490,000 510,000 580,000Annual Street Improvement Program n/a ST-040 1,000,000500,000 500,000MSA-Galpin Blvd Imp (Hwy 5 N to City limits) n/a ST-045 110,000110,000MSA Roadway Improvements - Lake Lucy Road n/a ST-048 120,000120,000MSA Roadway Improvements - Market Blvd n/a ST-049 50,00050,000MSA Street Imprv - Lake Drive East/Great Plains n/a ST-050 200,000200,000Crimson Bay Road/Dogwood Road Connection n/a SWMP-057 50,00050,000Downtown Water Reuse Project n/a T-177UB 80,00040,000 40,000Utility Billing Software Replacement n/a W-032 503,000121,000 86,000 43,000 115,000 138,000Well Rehabilitation Program n/a W-046 2,600,0002,600,000Low Zone 1 MG Storage Tank n/a W-059 1,400,0001,400,000Well #16 n/a W-065 1,350,000250,000 260,000 270,000 280,000 290,000Trunk Watermain Maintenance n/a W-067 500,000500,000TH5 Watermain - AATP n/a W-068 372,00040,000 80,000 82,000 84,000 86,000Water Treatment Plant Bldg & Equip n/a W-069 120,000120,000WTP Mechanical Improvements n/a 12,329,4001,173,000 2,340,500 1,487,000 1,022,000 6,306,900Utility Fund -Water Total Utillity Assessments -Developer SS-020 950,000950,0002010 MUSA Sanitary Lift Station n/a SS-024 7,900,0007,900,000Lower Bluff Creek Trunk Utility Improvements n/a 8,850,000950,000 7,900,000Utillity Assessments -Developer Total 85,768,1509,920,950 23,103,900 19,199,500 8,722,600 24,821,200GRAND TOTAL Thursday, November 18, 2021 26 Capital Improvement Program City of Chanhassen, MN PROJECTS & FUNDING SOURCES BY DEPARTMENT 2022 2026thru Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Department Project # Priority Facilities MB-048 750,000100,000 50,000 200,000 200,000 200,000Deferred Maintenance Allowance - All n/a Capital Fund -Facilities 100,000 50,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 750,000 MBCH-033 300,000300,000City Hall Roof Replacement n/a Capital Fund -Facilities 300,000 300,000 MBCH-045 10,00010,000Senior Center/Maple Room Kitchen Flooring Replace n/a Capital Fund -Facilities 10,000 10,000 MBCH-046 10,00010,000Senior Center / Maple Room Carpet Replacement n/a Capital Fund -Facilities 10,000 10,000 MBFire-047 35,00035,000Fire Station 1 Pavement & Drainage Repairs n/a Capital Fund -Facilities 15,000 15,000 Utility Fund -Surface Wtr 20,000 20,000 MBLib-051 21,00010,000 11,000Library Building Facility Maintenance n/a Capital Fund -Facilities 10,000 11,000 21,000 MBPW-042 60,00060,000PW Facility - Fuel island canopy n/a Capital Fund -Facilities 24,000 24,000 Utility Fund -Sewer 12,000 12,000 Utility Fund -Surface Wtr 12,000 12,000 Utility Fund -Water 12,000 12,000 MBPW-043 17,50017,500PW Facility - Fuel Tank Monitoring Sytem Upgrade n/a Capital Fund -Facilities 7,000 7,000 Utility Fund -Sewer 3,500 3,500 Utility Fund -Surface Wtr 3,500 3,500 Utility Fund -Water 3,500 3,500 MBPW-044 25,00025,000PW Facility - Salt Shed Canvas Cover Replacement n/a ISF -Fleet Capital 25,000 25,000 MBPW-050 21,00021,000PW Facility Maintenance n/a Capital Fund -Facilities 21,000 21,000 MBRec-140 50,00025,000 25,000Recreation Center Revitalization Project n/a Capital Fund -Facilities 25,000 25,000 50,000 1,299,500195,000 402,500 225,000 245,000 232,000Facilities Total Fleet - Capital F-01A 7,4007,400Trailer - 2009 Felling Tandem Axel n/a ISF -Fleet Capital 7,400 7,400 F-01B 12,30012,300Trailer - 2009 Felling Tandem Axel n/a ISF -Fleet Capital 12,300 12,300 F-01F 7,6007,600Trailer - 2010 Felling Tandem Axel n/a ISF -Fleet Capital 7,600 7,600 F-01G 40,00040,000Trailer - 2000 Towmaster Tri Axel n/a ISF -Fleet Capital 40,000 40,000 F-100A 20,00020,000Steamer n/a Utility Fund -Surface Wtr 20,000 20,000 F-100B 30,00030,000Portable Message Boards n/a ISF -Fleet Capital 30,000 30,000 Thursday, November 18, 2021 27 Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Department Project # Priority F-100C 10,00010,000Breaker Bar Attachment n/a ISF -Fleet Capital 10,000 10,000 F-100D 15,00015,000Compacting attachment for exavator n/a ISF -Fleet Capital 15,000 15,000 F-102 227,300227,300Streets Dump/Plow 2006 Sterling LT9500 n/a ISF -Fleet Capital 227,300 227,300 F-103 295,000295,000Streets Dump/Plow 2007 Sterling LT9500 n/a ISF -Fleet Capital 295,000 295,000 F-104 330,000330,000Streets Dump/Plow 2008 Mack Tandem Axle GU713 n/a ISF -Fleet Capital 330,000 330,000 F-127 235,000235,000Streets Dump/Plow Truck 2001 Sterling L8513 n/a ISF -Fleet Capital 235,000 235,000 F-128 242,000242,000Streets Dump/Plow 2003 Sterling L8513 n/a ISF -Fleet Capital 242,000 242,000 F-136 310,000310,000Street Sweeper 2003 Elgin n/a Utility Fund -Surface Wtr 310,000 310,000 F-137 32,00032,000Compressor 1993 Sullair n/a ISF -Fleet Capital 32,000 32,000 F-141 121,300121,300Tractor - 2006 John Deere w/ Broom n/a ISF -Fleet Capital 121,300 121,300 F-142 154,500154,5001989 Snowblower attachment for Loader n/a ISF -Fleet Capital 154,500 154,500 F-146 286,700286,700Streets Dump/Plow - Replace Loader 544G n/a ISF -Fleet Capital 286,700 286,700 F-152 59,00059,000Vibratory Compactor 1994 Cat n/a ISF -Fleet Capital 59,000 59,000 F-158 46,00046,000Hot Box with Asphalt Premix Heater n/a ISF -Fleet Capital 46,000 46,000 F-209 825,000825,000Fire Pumper Truck - 2007 Truck n/a Certificates of Indebtedness 825,000 825,000 F-211 800,000800,000Fire Pumper Truck - 1996 Toyne n/a Certificates of Indebtedness 800,000 800,000 F-231 35,00035,000Grass Response Rig - 2005 Polaris Ranger 4x4 n/a ISF -Fleet Capital 35,000 35,000 F-232 23,50023,500Boat Rescue - 2006 Dura Craft Boat/Motor/Trailer n/a ISF -Fleet Capital 23,500 23,500 F-302 140,000140,000Pickup - 2012 Ford F450 with crane n/a Utility Fund -Sewer 70,000 70,000 Utility Fund -Water 70,000 70,000 F-396 28,90028,900Scrubber - 2006 Tennant n/a Utility Fund -Water 28,900 28,900 F-406 90,00090,000Dump Truck to replace 2008 Ford F450 4x4 w/Plow n/a ISF -Fleet Capital 90,000 90,000 F-450 114,000114,000Mower - 2009 Toro Groundsmaster 5900 n/a ISF -Fleet Capital 114,000 114,000 F-451 86,00086,000Mower - 2012 Toro Groundsmaster 4000 n/a ISF -Fleet Capital 86,000 86,000 F-452 118,000118,000Mower - 2015 Toro Groundsmaster 5900 n/a ISF -Fleet Capital 118,000 118,000 F-456 83,00083,000Mower - 2016 Toro Grounsmaster 4000-D n/a ISF -Fleet Capital 83,000 83,000 F-471 90,00090,000Tractor - 2001 John Deere 5520 n/a ISF -Fleet Capital 90,000 90,000 F-472 22,00022,000Tractor 2001 John Deere 455 (replace w/ ABI) n/a ISF -Fleet Capital 22,000 22,000 Thursday, November 18, 2021 28 Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Department Project # Priority F-473 43,00043,000Tractor - John Deere 4710 n/a ISF -Fleet Capital 43,000 43,000 F-474 95,00095,000Tractor w/ Snowblower 2004 John Deere 5520 n/a ISF -Fleet Capital 95,000 95,000 F-480 15,00015,000Tractor Snowblower for F-471 Erskine 1996 n/a ISF -Fleet Capital 15,000 15,000 F-4XX 9,9009,900Weed Sprayer n/a ISF -Fleet Capital 9,900 9,900 F-skid 140,00028,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000Annual Skid Loader Trade In n/a ISF -Fleet Capital 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 140,000 5,239,400263,000 1,793,400 986,200 725,600 1,471,200Fleet - Capital Total Fleet - Leased Vehicles F-001 27,00027,000Sedan - 2010 Chev Impala 4 door n/a ISF -Fleet Leased 27,000 27,000 F-131 49,00049,000Pickup - 2010 GMC Sierra 2500 w plow n/a ISF -Fleet Capital 49,000 49,000 F-132 50,00050,000Pickup w/plow - 2013 chev 1500 n/a ISF -Fleet Leased 50,000 50,000 F-134 44,00044,000Pickup -2013 2500 4x4 n/a ISF -Fleet Leased 44,000 44,000 F-155 35,00035,000Pickup 2002 Chev 1/2ton 4x4 n/a ISF -Fleet Leased 35,000 35,000 F-202 74,15074,150SUV - 2015 Chev Tahoe n/a ISF -Fleet Leased 74,150 74,150 F-203 65,00065,000SUV - 2013 Chev Tahoe n/a ISF -Fleet Leased 65,000 65,000 F-204 74,15074,150SUV - 2015 Chev Tahoe n/a ISF -Fleet Leased 74,150 74,150 F-307 31,00031,000SUV - 2017 Chevrolet Equinox n/a ISF -Fleet Leased 31,000 31,000 F-308 33,00033,000Pickup - 2013 GMC Sierra n/a ISF -Fleet Leased 33,000 33,000 F-401 46,00046,000Pickup 2004 Chev 4x4 w/Plow n/a ISF -Fleet Leased 46,000 46,000 F-402 41,00041,000Pickup 2004 Chev 4x4 w/Plow n/a ISF -Fleet Leased 41,000 41,000 F-408 46,00046,000Pickup 2008 Chev 4x4 w/Plow n/a ISF -Fleet Leased 46,000 46,000 F-409 41,00041,000Pickup - 2015 Chev Silverado K2500 n/a ISF -Fleet Leased 41,000 41,000 F-411 47,00047,000Pickup 2010 GMC Sierra 4x4 w/Plow n/a ISF -Fleet Leased 47,000 47,000 F-419 50,00050,000Pickup 2012 Chev 4x4 w/Plow n/a ISF -Fleet Leased 50,000 50,000 F-420 50,00050,000Pickup 2012 Chev 4x4 w/Plow n/a ISF -Fleet Leased 50,000 50,000 F-501 32,00032,000Pickup - 2010 Chev Silverado n/a ISF -Fleet Leased 32,000 32,000 F-607 31,00031,000Pickup 2007 GMC Canyon n/a ISF -Fleet Leased 31,000 31,000 F-611 32,00032,000Pickup 2008 GMC Canyon n/a ISF -Fleet Leased 32,000 32,000 Thursday, November 18, 2021 29 Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Department Project # Priority F-612 32,95032,950Pickup 2008 GMC Canyon n/a ISF -Fleet Leased 32,950 32,950 F-702 40,00040,000Pickup 2016 GMC Sierra (formerly CSO) n/a ISF -Fleet Leased 40,000 40,000 F-802 33,00033,000Van - 2010 Grand Caravan n/a ISF -Fleet Leased 33,000 33,000 1,004,250354,950 91,000 323,300 194,000 41,000Fleet - Leased Vehicles Total Park Renovation P-072 90,00090,000Tennis Court Refurbishment n/a Capital Fund -Park Renovation 90,000 90,000 PR-2022A 150,000150,000N Lotus Lake Park Hockey Rink n/a Capital Fund -Park Renovation 150,000 150,000 PR-2022C 15,00015,000Meadow Green & Rice Marsh Backstops/Benches n/a Capital Fund -Park Renovation 15,000 15,000 PR-2022D 85,00085,000Roundhouse Park Playground n/a Capital Fund -Park Renovation 85,000 85,000 PR-2023R 60,00060,000Lake Ann Lake Side Pavilion Roof Replacement n/a Capital Fund -Park Renovation 60,000 60,000 400,000340,000 60,000Park Renovation Total Spec Revenue Fund Capital CEM-001 25,00025,000Cemetery Driveway Improvements n/a SR Fund -Cemetery Fund 25,000 25,000 T-026 105,00075,000 10,000 10,000 10,000Audio/Visual Equipment n/a SR Fund -Cable TV Franchise Fee 75,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 105,000 130,000100,000 10,000 10,000 10,000Spec Revenue Fund Capital Total Street Improvements ST-012 26,875,0005,075,000 5,225,000 5,375,000 5,525,000 5,675,000Annual Street Improvement Program n/a Capital Fund -PMP Assessments 1,560,000 1,600,000 1,640,000 1,680,000 1,720,000 8,200,000 Capital Fund -PMP Fund 2,340,000 2,400,000 2,460,000 2,520,000 2,580,000 12,300,000 Utility Fund -Sewer 225,000 235,000 245,000 255,000 265,000 1,225,000 Utility Fund -Surface Wtr 500,000 520,000 540,000 560,000 530,000 2,650,000 Utility Fund -Water 450,000 470,000 490,000 510,000 580,000 2,500,000 ST-040 11,250,0005,625,000 5,625,000MSA-Galpin Blvd Imp (Hwy 5 N to City limits) n/a Capital Fund -PMP MSA 1,500,000 1,500,000 3,000,000 Other Agency Contribution 3,500,000 3,500,000 7,000,000 Utility Fund -Sewer 125,000 125,000 250,000 Utility Fund -Water 500,000 500,000 1,000,000 ST-042 160,000160,000MSA-TH 41 and 82nd Street Signal n/a Capital Fund -PMP MSA 160,000 160,000 ST-043 520,000320,000 200,000Downtown Traffic Signals n/a Capital Fund -PMP Fund 160,000 200,000 360,000 Other Agency Contribution 160,000 160,000 ST-045 875,000875,000MSA Roadway Improvements - Lake Lucy Road n/a Capital Fund -PMP Assessments 176,000 176,000 Capital Fund -PMP MSA 464,000 464,000 Utility Fund -Sewer 60,000 60,000 Utility Fund -Surface Wtr 65,000 65,000 Utility Fund -Water 110,000 110,000 ST-048 4,000,0004,000,000MSA Roadway Improvements - Market Blvd n/a Capital Fund -PMP Assessments 680,000 680,000 Thursday, November 18, 2021 30 Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Department Project # Priority Capital Fund -PMP MSA 1,020,000 1,020,000 Debt -TIF Bonds 2,100,000 2,100,000 Utility Fund -Sewer 40,000 40,000 Utility Fund -Surface Wtr 40,000 40,000 Utility Fund -Water 120,000 120,000 ST-049 700,000700,000MSA Street Imprv - Lake Drive East/Great Plains n/a Capital Fund -PMP Assessments 200,000 200,000 Capital Fund -PMP MSA 300,000 300,000 Utility Fund -Sewer 50,000 50,000 Utility Fund -Surface Wtr 100,000 100,000 Utility Fund -Water 50,000 50,000 ST-050 1,500,0001,500,000Crimson Bay Road/Dogwood Road Connection n/a Capital Fund -PMP Assessments 120,000 120,000 Capital Fund -PMP Fund 180,000 180,000 Other Agency Contribution 700,000 700,000 Utility Fund -Sewer 200,000 200,000 Utility Fund -Surface Wtr 100,000 100,000 Utility Fund -Water 200,000 200,000 ST-051 2,800,0002,800,000TH41 MMSW Access Improvements n/a Capital Fund -PMP Fund 100,000 100,000 Other Agency - State Grant 2,200,000 2,200,000 Other Agency Contribution 400,000 400,000 Utility Fund -Surface Wtr 100,000 100,000 ST-052 810,000450,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000Bluff Creek Boulevard Extension n/a Capital Fund -PMP Fund 450,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 810,000 49,490,0006,400,000 16,920,000 13,890,000 5,815,000 6,465,000Street Improvements Total Technology MBU-041 80,00015,000 15,500 16,000 16,500 17,000Utility Fiber Connectivity - Sewer n/a Utility Fund -Water 15,000 15,500 16,000 16,500 17,000 80,000 T-014 50,00050,000Telecommunication Purchases/Upgrades n/a ISF -Technology 50,000 50,000 T-081 55,00055,000Storage Area Network (SAN) n/a ISF -Technology 55,000 55,000 T-177 200,000100,000 100,000Finance Software Replacement n/a ISF -Technology 100,000 100,000 200,000 T-177UB 200,000100,000 100,000Utility Billing Software Replacement n/a Utility Fund -Sewer 40,000 40,000 80,000 Utility Fund -Surface Wtr 20,000 20,000 40,000 Utility Fund -Water 40,000 40,000 80,000 585,000320,000 215,500 16,000 16,500 17,000Technology Total TIM Transportation Inf Mgmt ST-047 200,00040,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000ADA Transition Plan Improvements n/a Capital Fund -TIM Transp Infr Mgmt 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 200,000 TIM-02 380,00072,000 74,000 76,000 78,000 80,000Trails & Parking Lots Pavement Mgmt n/a Capital Fund -TIM Transp Infr Mgmt 72,000 74,000 76,000 78,000 80,000 380,000 580,000112,000 114,000 116,000 118,000 120,000TIM Transportation Inf Mgmt Total Utiliities - Water MBU-040 80,00015,000 15,500 16,000 16,500 17,000Utility Fiber Connectivity - Water Facilities n/a Utility Fund -Water 15,000 15,500 16,000 16,500 17,000 80,000 W-032 503,000121,000 86,000 43,000 115,000 138,000Well Rehabilitation Program n/a Utility Fund -Water 121,000 86,000 43,000 115,000 138,000 503,000 Thursday, November 18, 2021 31 Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Department Project # Priority W-046 2,600,0002,600,000Low Zone 1 MG Storage Tank n/a Utility Fund -Water 2,600,000 2,600,000 W-059 1,400,0001,400,000Well #16 n/a Utility Fund -Water 1,400,000 1,400,000 W-065 1,350,000250,000 260,000 270,000 280,000 290,000Trunk Watermain Maintenance n/a Utility Fund -Water 250,000 260,000 270,000 280,000 290,000 1,350,000 W-067 1,000,0001,000,000TH5 Watermain - AATP n/a Other Agency Contribution 500,000 500,000 Utility Fund -Water 500,000 500,000 W-068 372,00040,000 80,000 82,000 84,000 86,000Water Treatment Plant Bldg & Equip n/a Utility Fund -Water 40,000 80,000 82,000 84,000 86,000 372,000 W-069 120,000120,000WTP Mechanical Improvements n/a Utility Fund -Water 120,000 120,000 7,425,000546,000 1,441,500 411,000 495,500 4,531,000Utiliities - Water Total Utilities - Sanitary Sewer SS-012 1,100,000200,000 210,000 220,000 230,000 240,000Inflow and Infiltration Abatement n/a Utility Fund -Sewer 200,000 210,000 220,000 230,000 240,000 1,100,000 SS-017 705,000190,000 170,000 150,000 95,000 100,000Sanitary Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Program n/a Utility Fund -Sewer 190,000 170,000 150,000 95,000 100,000 705,000 SS-020 1,900,0001,900,0002010 MUSA Sanitary Lift Station n/a Utility Fund -Sewer 950,000 950,000 Utillity Assessments -Developer 950,000 950,000 SS-024 10,800,00010,800,000Lower Bluff Creek Trunk Utility Improvements n/a Utility Fund -Sewer 1,800,000 1,800,000 Utility Fund -Water 1,100,000 1,100,000 Utillity Assessments -Developer 7,900,000 7,900,000 SS-027 400,000200,000 200,000Lift Station Access Improvements n/a Other Agency Contribution 25,000 25,000 Utility Fund -Sewer 125,000 125,000 250,000 Utility Fund -Surface Wtr 75,000 50,000 125,000 14,905,000590,000 380,000 2,470,000 325,000 11,140,000Utilities - Sanitary Sewer Total Utilities - Surface Water Mgmt SWMP-032 3,025,000675,000 100,000 725,000 750,000 775,000Stormwater Pond Improvements n/a Utility Fund -Surface Wtr 675,000 100,000 725,000 750,000 775,000 3,025,000 SWMP-046 500,000500,000Lotus Lake Channels & Outfall Improvements n/a Other Agency Contribution 450,000 450,000 Utility Fund -Surface Wtr 50,000 50,000 SWMP-048 600,000600,000Upper Riley Creek Channel Stabilization n/a Utility Fund -Surface Wtr 600,000 600,000 SWMP-057 350,000350,000Downtown Water Reuse Project n/a Other Agency Contribution 250,000 250,000 Utility Fund -Surface Wtr 50,000 50,000 Utility Fund -Water 50,000 50,000 SWMP-059 135,00025,000 26,000 27,000 28,000 29,000Stormwater Management Partnership Program n/a Utility Fund -Surface Wtr 25,000 26,000 27,000 28,000 29,000 135,000 SWMP-061 100,000100,000Red Cedar Point Stormwater Improvements n/a Utility Fund -Surface Wtr 100,000 100,000 4,710,000700,000 1,676,000 752,000 778,000 804,000Utilities - Surface Water Mgmt Total GRAND TOTAL 85,768,1509,920,950 23,103,900 19,199,500 8,722,600 24,821,200 Thursday, November 18, 2021 32 Capital Improvement Program City of Chanhassen, MN PENDING PROJECTS (Includes projects with a 'Status' set to 'Pending') Project Name Department Project # Priority Project Cost Pending P-123Bandimere Community Park Picnic Shelter n/a 640,000Park Plan Unfunded Projects P-129Bandimere Park Sport Court n/a 245,000Park Plan Unfunded Projects P-136Recreation Center Fenced Dugouts and Backstops n/a 150,000Park Plan Unfunded Projects P-143Lake Ann Ballfield LED Light Fixture Replacement n/a 1,000,000Park Plan Unfunded Projects TOTAL 2,035,000 Pending PR-2023Playgrounds Carver Beach/Sugarbush/SLotus Lake n/a 250,000Park Renovation Unfunded PR-2024Lake Ann Park Playground & Batting Cages n/a 250,000Park Renovation Unfunded PR-2025Bandimere Playgrounds-1 large & 1 small n/a 250,000Park Renovation Unfunded PR-2025BSkate Park Resurfacing n/a 75,000Park Renovation Unfunded PR-2026Meadow Green Playground & Tennis Court n/a 250,000Park Renovation Unfunded TOTAL 1,075,000 Thursday, November 18, 2021 33 2022 Budget ‐ Total Budget by Fund Type General Fund Special Revenue Funds Capital Funds Debt Service Funds General Government Funds Enterprise Funds Internal Service Funds Total All Funds SOURCE OF FUNDS Property tax levy 10,194,746 ‐ 1,984,490 483,840 12,663,076 ‐ ‐ 12,663,076 Property tax ‐ delinquent & other ‐ ‐ ‐ Tax Increment ‐ ‐ 280,000 ‐ 280,000 ‐ 280,000 Other taxes ‐ 175,000 1,860,000 ‐ 2,035,000 ‐ 2,035,000 Special Assessments ‐ ‐ 208,000 ‐ 208,000 ‐ 208,000 Licenses 96,600 ‐ ‐ ‐ 96,600 ‐ 96,600 Permits 1,272,000 ‐ 30,000 ‐ 1,302,000 ‐ 1,302,000 Fines and forfeits 76,500 ‐ ‐ ‐ 76,500 ‐ 76,500 Investment income 135,000 5,500 47,200 ‐ 187,700 200,000 387,700 Rents 262,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ 262,000 ‐ ‐ 262,000 Intergovermental ‐ ‐ ‐ Grants & Aids 550,000 1,398,000 ‐ 1,948,000 38,000 1,986,000 Shared Capital Project ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Charges for services 520,500 8,000 ‐ ‐ 528,500 7,379,800 ‐ 7,908,300 Internal Service Fund Charges ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,961,575 1,961,575 Connection Charges ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,100,000 ‐ 2,100,000 Other 93,200 50,000 20,000 ‐ 163,200 122,300 ‐ 285,500 Bond Proceeds ‐ ‐ 1,736,000 ‐ 1,736,000 1,000,000 ‐ 2,736,000 Transfer from other funds ‐ ‐ 376,000 ‐ 376,000 ‐ 130,000 506,000 TOTAL SOURCE OF FUNDS 13,200,546 238,500 7,939,690 483,840 21,862,576 10,840,100 2,091,575 34,794,251 USE OF FUNDS Personnel Services 6,952,253 107,946 ‐ ‐ 7,060,199 2,214,800 808,250 10,083,249 Current Expense 6,248,294 154,300 316,500 ‐ 6,719,094 5,682,645 975,000 13,376,739 Capital Outlay (Equipment)‐ 100,000 875,000 ‐ 975,000 1,836,000 260,000 3,071,000 Capital Improvements (Infrastructure)‐ 5,162,000 ‐ 5,162,000 ‐ ‐ 5,162,000 Other ‐ ‐ 266,000 ‐ 266,000 ‐ ‐ 266,000 Debt Service ‐ ‐ ‐ 452,775 452,775 975,695 ‐ 1,428,470 Transfer to other funds 250,000 ‐ 90,000 ‐ 340,000 ‐ ‐ 340,000 TOTAL USE OF FUNDS 13,450,546 362,246 6,709,500 452,775 20,975,067 10,709,140 2,043,250 33,727,457 FUND BALANCE Net Change in Fund Balance (250,000) (123,746) 1,230,190 31,065 887,509 887,509 Net Change in Net Assets (Enterprise Funds) 130,960 48,325 179,285 34 2021 Budget ‐ Debt Service Funds Permanent Revolving Debt (closed) 2009A GO Refunding (closed) 2016A GO Refunding Bonds Total Debt Service Funds 300 368 370 SOURCE OF FUNDS Property taxes ‐ ‐ 483,840 483,840 Investment income ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Transfer from other funds ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ TOTAL SOURCE OF FUNDS ‐ ‐ 483,840 483,840 USE OF FUNDS Debt Service ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Principal ‐ ‐ 360,000 360,000 Interest & Fiscal Agent Fees ‐ ‐ 92,775 92,775 Transfer to other funds ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ TOTAL USE OF FUNDS ‐ ‐ 452,775 452,775 FUND BALANCE Net Change in Fund Balance ‐ ‐ 31,065 31,065 Fund Balance ‐ Beginning 743,824 440,983 627,059 1,811,866 FUND BALANCE ‐ ENDING 743,824 440,983 658,124 1,842,931 35 2021 Budget ‐ Capital Projects Funds Fleet & Equip Capital Facilities Capital Park Renovation Park Develop‐ ment Transp Infrastructure Maint TIF #11 Frontier Dev #2 Pavement Mgmt Plan Total Capital Projects Funds 400 401 410 420 480 601 SOURCE OF FUNDS Property taxes 565,000 125,000 ‐ ‐ 394,490 ‐ 900,000 1,984,490 Tax Increment ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 280,000 ‐ 280,000 Franchise Fees ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,860,000 1,860,000 Special Assessments ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 208,000 208,000 Permits & development fees ‐ ‐ 30,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ 30,000 Investment income 10,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 37,200 47,200 Intergovermental MSA ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,398,000 1,398,000 Other Agencies ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Other 20,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 20,000 Bond Proceeds ‐ 1,736,000 1,736,000 Transfer from other funds ‐ 36,000 340,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 376,000 TOTAL SOURCE OF FUNDS 595,000 161,000 340,000 30,000 394,490 280,000 6,139,200 7,939,690 USE OF FUNDS Current Expense ‐ ‐ ‐ 311,500 5,000 ‐ 316,500 Capital Outlay 263,000 160,000 340,000 ‐ 112,000 ‐ ‐ 875,000 Capital Improvements ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5,162,000 5,162,000 Debt Service ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 266,000 ‐ 266,000 Transfer to other funds 90,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 90,000 TOTAL USE OF FUNDS 353,000 160,000 340,000 ‐ 423,500 271,000 5,162,000 6,709,500 FUND BALANCE Net Change in Fund Balance 242,000 1,000 ‐ 30,000 (29,010) 9,000 977,200 1,230,190 Fund Balance ‐ Beginning 1,090,610 ‐ 22,716 14,001 390,677 5,930 3,713,532 5,237,466 FUND BALANCE ‐ ENDING 1,332,610 1,000 22,716 44,001 361,667 14,930 4,690,732 6,467,656 36 2021 Budget ‐ Special Revenue Funds Charitable Gambling Contribution (201) Cemetery Fund (202) Communications Fund (210) Grant Fund (212) Total Special Revenue Funds SOURCE OF FUNDS Property taxes ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Other taxes ‐ ‐ 175,000 ‐ 175,000 Investment income ‐ 500 5,000 ‐ 5,500 Intergovermental ‐ ‐ 8,500 ‐ 8,500 Charges for services ‐ 8,000 ‐ ‐ 8,000 Other 50,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ 50,000 Transfer from other funds ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ TOTAL SOURCE OF FUNDS 50,000 8,500 188,500 ‐ 247,000 USE OF FUNDS Personnel Services ‐ 5,125 102,821 ‐ 107,946 Current Expense 50,000 2,500 101,800 ‐ 154,300 Capital Outlay ‐ 25,000 75,000 ‐ 100,000 Transfer to other funds ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ TOTAL USE OF FUNDS 50,000 32,625 279,621 ‐ 362,246 FUND BALANCE Net Change in Fund Balance ‐ (24,125) (91,121) ‐ (115,246) Fund Balance ‐ Beginning 22,128 141,710 544,443 ‐ 708,281 FUND BALANCE ‐ ENDING 22,128 117,585 453,322 ‐ 593,035 37 Property Tax Levy Impacts2022 Budget Change2022 Levy Impact % Change % Change % Change % Change %Beginning Levy $ 12,066,700 $ 12,663,200 $ 13,579,200 $ 14,325,200 $ 14,956,200 General FundEmployee Services 345,000 2.9%350,000 2.8%300,000 2.2%300,000 2.1%300,000 2.0%Current Expenses* 161,000 1.3%220,000 1.7%200,000 1.5%200,000 1.4%200,000 1.3%Total Expenses 506,000 4.2%570,000 4.5%500,000 3.7%500,000 3.5%500,000 3.3%Revenues net increase (other than tax levy)(200,000) ‐1.7%‐ 0.0%‐ 0.0%‐ 0.0%‐ 0.0%Current Service Level 306,000 2.5%570,000 4.5%500,000 3.7%500,000 3.5%500,000 3.3%Service Level Enhancement ‐‐ Increase fire response trend (2 firefighte110,000 220,000 1.7%110,000 0.8%20,000 0.1%20,000 0.1%ARPA funding ($110k phased out in 2024)Economic Development Manager 100,000 30,000 0.2%30,000 0.2%5,000 0.0%5,000 0.0%ARPA funding ($50k phased out 2023/2024)‐ New Fire & Economic Dev Initiatives 210,000 1.7%250,000 2.0%140,000 1.0%25,000 0.2%25,000 0.2%General Fund 516,000 4.3%820,000 6.5%640,000 4.7%525,000 3.7%525,000 3.5%Capital Plan IncreasesFleet & Equipment Capital Fund 40,000 50,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 Facilities Capital Fund 25,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Transportation Infrastructure Mgmt 11,500 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 Capital Project Funds 76,500 0.6%92,000 0.7%102,000 0.8%102,000 0.7%102,000 0.7%Debt Service 4,000 0.0%4,000 0.0%4,000 0.0%4,000 0.0%4,000 0.0%Proposed 2022 Tax Levy Increase (2023 Projected)596,500 4.9%916,000 7.2%746,000 5.5%631,000 4.4%631,000 4.2%Proposed Tax Levy12,663,200$ 13,579,200$ 14,325,200$ 14,956,200$ 15,587,200$ Future Capital Improvements being consideredPark Renovations ‐ build to annual average pay‐as‐you‐go 150,000 1.2% 150,000 1.1% 50,000 0.3% 50,000 0.3%Park Improvements & Facility Renovations would be funded by bondsFor example, debt service on $20m bonds for 20 years would be roughly $1.2m annually 600,000 4.4% 610,000 4.3%2026 Levy Impact2022 Levy ImpactFuture Projections2023 Levy Impact 2024 Levy Impact 2025 Levy Impact38 City Council Item November 22, 2021 Item Future Work Session Schedule File No.Item No: A.2 Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION N/A Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY The City Council is tentatively scheduled to hold the following work sessions: December 13 January 8, 2022 1. Special Meeting: Strategic Planning Session January 10, 2022 1. Facilities Study Presentation and Discussion January 24, 2022 39 1. Discuss Assessment Policy Updates February 14, 2022 1. Active Shooter Training Presentation February 28, 2022 BACKGROUND Staff or the City Council may suggest topics for work sessions. Dates are tentative until the meeting agenda is published. Work sessions are typically held at 5:30 pm on the second and fourth Monday of each month in conjunction with the regular City Council meeting, but may be scheduled for other times as needed. DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 40 City Council Item November 22, 2021 Item Approve Economic Development Authority Meeting Minutes dated March 8, 2021 File No.Item No: B.1 Agenda Section 7:00 P.M. - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen Economic Development Authority approves the minutes dated March 8, 2021." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 41 Economic Development Authority Minutes dated March 8, 2021 42 CHANHASSEN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES MARCH 8, 2021 Mayor Ryan called the meeting to order at 7:19 p.m. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilman Campion, Councilwoman Rehm, Councilwoman Schubert, and Councilman McDonald. Councilwoman Rehm joined via Zoom. COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT:None. STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director PUBLIC PRESENT: Nick Anhut Senior Municipal Advisor, Ehlers APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded to approve the verbatim Minutes of the Economic Development Authority meeting dated August 10, 2020 as presented. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 3 to 0. Councilwoman Rehm and Councilwoman Schubert recused themselves from this item. RESOLUTION #2021-XX: CONSIDER RESOLUTION TO ADOPT TIF PLAN DOCUMENTS Community Development Director Kate Aanenson gave an overview of the Lakes of Chanhassen project and introduced Nick Anhut, Senior Municipal Advisor at Ehlers. Mr. Anhut explained the use of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) for this project. The EDA will create and administer the TIF district. TIF is the ability to capture and utilize most of the increased local property tax revenue from new development. Property in a TIF district pays property taxes just like any other property; however, a significant portion will be captured and remitted to EDA for use in assistance for the project. Notice was provided to the County and School District. The Planning Commission reviewed the TIF document to attest that it complies with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The EDA, serving as the administrative body, will provide recommendation to the City Council and oversee how 43 City Council Minutes – March 8, 2021 2 funds are expended. A public hearing will be held as part of the March 22, 2021 City Council meeting. TIF can be used to support affordable housing. There is a statutory maximum of 25 years after TIF revenue is received (26 years total). Mr. Anhut stated he doesn’t believe 26 years will be necessary and estimates closer to 16 years. To qualify for TIF, housing must include 40% of units at 60% of the area median income. The proposed project will include 45% of units and these units will be designated as such as long as the TIF district is out and generating revenue. The revenue generated can only be used to assist affordable housing projects that qualify throughout the city. The $23.5 million Lakes of Chanhassen project will not proceed without public assistance and the level of costs are not generated solely by the rents. There’s a need for an additional source of revenue for mortgage, financing and equity to pay for this project. A TIF district has been requested to fill that gap. Using information from Carver County, Mr. Anhut anticipates $18.7 million taxable amount generating $5.6 million TIF revenue over 26 years. The TIF plan will include 90% for assisting affordable housing needs and 10% will be set aside for EDA administration and reporting costs. The EDA will be able to negotiate the actual terms of use. The EDA agrees, if the developer goes ahead, that they will administer the TIF district, and issue a pay-as-you-go $5.3 million TIF note. The City will not be held accountable to provide any additional revenue; all revenue will come from the TIF district and project. The developer is at risk to generate revenue to service the note. If approved, the first increment of construction will happen in 2021. Following the TIF being paid off, the EDA can decide whether to terminate the TIF district. The property would then revert onto the tax rolls. Or, the EDA could decide to use the revenue to assist in other affordable housing-related projects within the City of Chanhassen. Councilman Campion asked at what point would the EDA have to decide how the funds are designated? Is it during the 16-17 years of or at the end of the time period? Mr. Anhut clarified that 10% is retained within the TIF fund. Any amount not needed for administration could be used for other types of affordable housing. This amount would be roughly $15,000 a year. 90% will go to service the TIF note and the bulk of the money would not be accessible until after the TIF note obligation is satisfied, which could be 16 or more years. Mr. Anhut added, if no action is taken to utilize the funds, and the TIF note is paid off, the district will be required to be terminated and revert to the tax rolls automatically. 44 City Council Minutes – March 8, 2021 3 Mayor Ryan clarified that the funds may only be used toward affordable housing. Mr. Anhut confirmed the funds must be used for affordable housing - either new housing projects or for existing buildings that need rehabilitation. Councilman Campion asked if the affordable housing project needed to be located within the geographic bounds of the TIF district or within the City of Chanhassen. Mr. Anhut stated that the TIF district is the parcel that the Lakes of Chanhassen building occupies. As long as a project meets affordability requirements, the City can use the revenue for any affordable project within the City of Chanhassen boundaries. Councilwoman Rehm asked that, during the March 22, 2021 public hearing, the TIF information be presented in a simple and understandable way. There may be questions from the community on how a TIF works. Councilman McDonald stated that, when a TIF district was created to assist in financing the Aldi and nearby apartments, the City was allowed to use extra money for projects that would touch that TIF district. Mr. Anhut stated the City has an existing TIF District, a redevelopment project which falls under a different statutory provision. With a redevelopment TIF district, funds can be used to assist in preparing the site and provide supporting infrastructure in and around the boundaries of the property. Revenue that is generated from the Lakes of Chanhassen property can potentially be “pooled” to assistant other like projects. This project does not require adjacent improvements. “Pooling” is not restricted within the geographic boundaries of the TIF district as long as it is used for qualifying affordable housing projects within the City of Chanhassen. Councilwoman Schubert asked if it would be possible to pass the TIF without the “pooling” so, when it is paid off, there isn’t residual that needs to be paid off. Mr. Anhut stated it could be one of the conditions added to the resolution to limit assistance to solely this project. Unless the EDA decides to use the funds the TIF will automatically terminate. Councilman Campion clarified that the $2.1 million does not begin “pooling” until years 17-26. Mr. Anhut stated that revenue is going to come in as taxes are paid. The project is requesting 90% to finance and pay their mortgage. Only when the obligation is satisfied will the City receive the full brunt of this tool to help finance another project or allow it to terminate. Councilman Campion clarified that 16 years was an estimate and that the time period could be greater or less. 45 City Council Minutes – March 8, 2021 4 Mr. Anhut stated that the TIF note is issued which carries an amount of $3 million. This is the gap in the financing that is needed for the project. Once $3 million is reached, it will be satisfied and cut off. Information from the Carver County Assessor suggests a repayment period of less than 26 years but it will fluctuate as the County, School District, and City adjust their tax rates. Ehlers estimates reaching the $3 million in 16 years. Resolution No. 2021-01 EDA: Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded, to adopt the resolution making a modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Downtown Chanhassen Redevelopment project area and a Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 12. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5-0. Councilman Campion moved, Councilman McDonald seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The Economic Development Authority meeting was adjourned at 7:58 p.m. Submitted by Heather Johnston Interim City Manager Prepared by Kim Meuwissen 46 City Council Item November 22, 2021 Item Approve Release of Contract for Private Development for Gateway North TIF District 9, Gateway Development, LLC File No.EDA 81 Item No: B.2 Agenda Section 7:00 P.M. - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING Prepared By Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION “The Economic Development Authority Approves the Release of Contract for Private Development Agreement (Chanhassen Gateway Place, LLC- TIF District #9).” Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY The Chanhassen Economic Development Authority (EDA) entered into a contract for Private Development on April 10, 2006. This agreement was part of the establishment of Tax Increment Finance (TIF) District #9. The property owners are in the process of refinancing Gateway Place with the intent of closing in December. In conjunction with the refinancing, they intend to renovate the property. The contract for private development was the TIF for the project and the increment ended in 2016. The property has remained affordable and will remain affordable with the refinancing. The 60% of AMI affordability restrictions (rent/income) on 47 of the 48 units is in place until 12/31/2036, which is ensured by the recorded Declaration of Land Use Restrictive Covenants from Minnesota Housing. The City also received a $300,000 Local Housing Incentives Account (LHIA) grant from the 47 Metropolitan Council for this project. The City then loaned these funds to the project which comes due on 12/31/2036. With the refinancing, the City will need to sign a lenders subordination agreement. The subornation agreement requires City Council approval and is on the November 22, 2021 City Council agenda. BACKGROUND A Contract for Private Development Agreement was recorded against the subject property (Lot 1, Block 2, Gateway North). Execution of the attached document will release the EDA document and no longer affect the property. DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Chanhassen Economic Development Authority approve the Release of Contract for Private Development agreement (Chanhassen Gateway Place, LLC- TIF District #9) ATTACHMENTS Release of Contract for Private Redevelopment 48 1 219121v1 (reserved for recording information) RELEASE OF CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT RELEASE OF CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT granted this ______ day of ________________, 2021, by the CHANHASSEN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, a public body corporate and politic under the laws of Minnesota (“EDA”). WHEREAS, the EDA and Chanhassen Gateway Place, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, have entered into a Contract for Private Development dated April 10, 2006 and recorded October 6, 2006 as Carver County Document No. A451286 (“Contract”); and WHEREAS, the EDA has been requested to release and discharge the property legally described on Exhibit A (“Property”) from the Contract; WHEREAS, all requirements of the Contract have been met as to the Property and there is no longer a need to have the Contract recorded against the Property. NOW THEREFORE,be it resolved by the Chanhassen Economic Development Authority: The Property is released and discharged from the Contract. ADOPTED this _____ day of _______________, 2021. [Remainder of the page is intentionally left blank. Signature page is to follow.] 49 2 219121v1 CHANHASSEN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY By ___________________________________ Elise Ryan, Chair And __________________________________ Laurie Hokkanen, Executive Director STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _______ day of __________________, 2021, by Elise Ryan and by Laurie Hokkanen, respectively the President and Executive Director of the Chanhassen Economic Development Authority, a public body corporate and politic under the laws of Minnesota, on behalf of the entity. ____________________________________ Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON, Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 AMP 50 3 219121v1 EXHIBIT A Lot 1, Block 2, Gateway North, Carver County, Minnesota. 51 City Council Item November 22, 2021 Item Invitation to Tree Lighting Ceremony, December 4 File No.Item No: D.1 Agenda Section PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS Prepared By Priya Tandon, Recreation Coordinator Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION N/A Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY With the holiday season approaching, we are excited to invite everyone to an annual Chanhassen tradition, the 2021 Tree Lighting Ceremony! This free event is presented by the City of Chanhassen, BuyChanhassen, SouthWest Metro Chamber of Commerce, The Mustard Seed Landscaping & Garden Center, and SouthWest Transit. We invite all area residents, their families, and friends to join the community on Saturday, December 4th starting at 5pm on the City Center Park Plaza. People of all ages will enjoy activities including the official lighting of City Center Park, refreshments, live reindeer, gingerbread house displays, and a special visit from Santa Claus. We hope to see you there! BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET 52 RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 53 City Council Item November 22, 2021 Item Approve City Council Minutes dated November 8, 2021 File No.Item No: E.1 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the City Council minutes dated November 8, 2021." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS November 8, 2021 City Council Work Session Minutes 54 November 8, 2021 City Council Meeting Minutes 55 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 8, 2021 Mayor Ryan called the work session to order at 5:00 p.m. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilwoman Rehm, Councilman Campion, and Councilwoman Schubert. COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT:Councilman McDonald. STAFF PRESENT: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager; Matt Unmacht, Assistant City Manager; Kelly Strey, Finance Director; Don Johnson, Fire Chief; Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; Charlie Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer; Rick Rice, IT Manager; and Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk. PUBLIC PRESENT: Jody McDevitt, Director of Sales, Energy Management Solutions Gary Swanson, President/CEO, Energy Management Solutions GENERAL FUND & PROPERTY TAX SUPPORTED FUNDS DISCUSSION Finance Director Kelly Strey presented a PowerPoint. She reviewed what was discussed at the previous budget meetings. Tonight she will be reviewing the General Fund and other Property Tax Support. The November 22 Work Session agenda will include the CIP review and capital projects funds, enterprise funds and utility rate review, debt study and debt service funds, fees and charges review, and follow up from the November 8 Work Session as needed. The Truth-in- Taxation meeting and budget adoption will occur on December 13. Strey presented a slide showing the annual budget and 5-year financial plans which includes Operating Revenue & Expenses, CIP, Debt Study, Utility Rate Study, Fees and Charges, Trend Analysis, and the CAFR. Strategic work that happened in 2021 included adopting the Strategic Plan, completing the compensation study, and the facility needs analysis. Budget-related outcomes include Financial Sustainability, Asset Management, and Operational Excellence. A slide showing a breakdown of the proposed property tax levy adopted in September was reviewed. A change in the financial impact on homeowners due to market value increases/decreases which affect the total amount increased per property. Strey presented a slide showing how Chanhassen’s proposed 2022 tax compares to comparable cities. Strey provided a breakdown of how the $596,400 tax levy increase (4.9%) was arrived at which includes Capital Plans, Current Service Levels, and Levy Available for Enhanced Services. Strey reviewed Fire Department decisions that need to be made which include Options 1-4, up to $210,000 levy funding, ARPA, use of Fund Balance, and future tax levy implications. 56 City Council Work Session Minutes – November 8, 2021 2 Strey presented a slide on the Fleet Replacement Fund and discussed issues and gaps in funding. The implementation of the new light duty vehicle leasing program results in $300,000 in capital funding can be redirected in 2021-2022. $400,000 can be removed from the Capital Fun in 2023- 2026. The first round of vehicles sales is estimated to provide $234,000 to the replacement fund. The lease payments for the first round are within budget. Maintenance and gas savings will be evaluated as they occur and will update for the 2023 budget. Strey reviewed capital replacement fund needs which will be improved due to the new leasing structure. Deferred maintenance and replacement needs had been identified in the heavy equipment. Two fire trucks had been extended more than five years beyond their expected life and will need to be replaced in 2023 and 2027. Fire Chief Don Johnson elaborated on the topic. The updated CIP will be discussed in specific at the next meeting. Council expressed concern regarding the future big budget increases, i.e. facility needs and Fire Department staffing needs, park referendum etc. and if there was a plan in place to address these increases. Strey presented a five-year financial plan for the fleet leased program vehicles. Strey presented a slide on the available general fund balance which includes the current available fund balance, 2021 budget amendments to use fund balance, and 2022 proposed budget calls for one-time use of fund balance. Budget 2022 general fund revenue sources and expenses were reviewed. Successes in the general fund and capital funds were presented and the outlook for maintaining AAA bond rating is positive. Chief Johnson reviewed the Fire Department staffing PowerPoint that was presented at the previous work session. The Work Session recessed at 6:58 p.m. The Work Session reconvened at 7:55 pm. DISCUSS ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION OFFER FROM CARBON SOLUTIONS GROUP City Manager Laurie Hokkanen presented a PowerPoint on electric vehicles (EV) and electric vehicle charging stations. Carbon Solutions Group’s (CSG) proposal includes installing a network of 26 publicly-accessible EV charging stations at nine locations on city-owned property at no cost to the City. In addition, the City will receive five electric vehicles. Hokkanen showed the nine locations where EV charging stations would be installed which include City Hall, Lake Ann Park, Lake Susan Park, Bandimere Park, Chanhassen Recreation Center, public parking lot at Medical Arts buildings, public parking lot south of Tequila Butcher on West 79th Street, Fire Station 2, and the Public Works building. 57 City Council Work Session Minutes – November 8, 2021 3 Hokkanen reviewed specifics of the deal structure and how this effort ties in with the City’s Strategic Plan (Financial Sustainability, Asset Management, Development and Redevelopment, and Operational Excellence). The revenue potential was reviewed. Jody McDevitt and Gary Swanson from Energy Management Solutions, Inc. answered questions about electricity use, how long will the chargers last, and how long does it take to charge. Software on charging stations will be updated automatically via cellular communications without requiring City IT involvement. How do existing charging stations in the City (Goodwill, Kwik Trip) compare to what is being offered by Carbon Solutions Group. Revenue share to the City was reviewed and discussed. Public and private sectors will both invest in EV charging stations. The charging stations generate renewable energy credits (RECs). Mayor Ryan asked what direction the Council should take. Hokkanen responded that this was an informational session. There is not a rush to approve; however, supply chain issues are causing delays. FUTURE WORK SESSION SCHEDULE Hokkanen asked Council to confirm that Saturday, January 8 would work for the annual strategic planning session. The meeting adjourned at 8:46 p.m. Submitted and prepared by Kim Meuwissen City Clerk 58 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES NOVEMBER 8, 2021 Mayor Ryan called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilman Campion, Councilwoman Rehm, and Councilwoman Schubert. COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT:Councilman McDonald. STAFF PRESENT: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager; Matt Unmacht, Assistant City Manager; Kelly Strey, Finance Director; Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; Charlie Howley, Public Works Director/City Clerk; Jerry Ruegemer, Park & Recreation Director; George Bender, Assistant City Engineer; Don Johnson, Fire Chief; Andrea McDowell Poehler, City Attorney; and Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk. PUBLIC PRESENT: Representative Kelly Morrison Mack Titus, 2747 Century Trail David Gatto, 9631 Foxford Road Mayor Ryan noted Thursday, November 11 is Veterans Day and on behalf of City Council she thanked all of the U.S. servicemen and servicewomen who have served and are currently serving, noting they are heroes. PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: None. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman Campion moved, Councilwoman Schubert seconded that the City Council approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager’s recommendations: 1. Approve City Council minutes dated October 25, 2021 2. Receive Park & Recreation Commission Minutes dated September 28, 2021 3. Approve Claims Paid November 8, 2021 4.Resolution 2021-66: Authorize Contract for 2021 Stormwater Pond Maintenance Project 5. Approve a Request for an Interim Use Permit (IUP) for Grading in Excess of 1,000 Cubic Yards for the Creation of a Berm on Property Located at 9631 Foxford Road 59 City Council Minutes – November 8, 2021 2 6. Assignment of Development Contract for Lotus Woods 7. Authorize Execution of Stormwater Maintenance Agreement for Lot 2, Block 1, Crossroads of Chanhassen Development 8. Approve the Park & Recreation Program Severe Weather Guidelines, Updated October 2021 9. Approve Letter of Support for University of Minnesota Landscape Arboretum "Farm at the Arb" Parking Expansion Project All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS: 1. Representative Kelly Morrison Representative Kelly Morrison provided a session update, noting the State has endured challenges. During these partisan times, Minnesota has crafted a bipartisan compromise budget in each of the past two sessions and they have done it as the only divided legislature in the country. Highlights of the budget focused on Covid and recovering from the impacts of the pandemic on the economy, small businesses, and people. She stated ultimately, the House, Senate, and the Governor came together to craft Minnesota’s $52 billion budget. Higher revenues than expected and some federal money made some of this possible. Representative Morrison gave highlights of some of the Omnibus bills, noting she served on two health committees. She gave summaries on bills affecting health and human services in the State, including dental reform, enhanced asthma services, homelessness and recuperative care, youth tobacco use prevention, telehealth, expanded access to those geographically isolated, and mental health services. In terms of K12 education, the final bill included 2.45% and 2% increases in the general education formula over the next two years and made one of the largest funding increases for public education in almost two decades. She shared the public safety and judiciary bill were combined into one and attempted to strike a balance between addressing police accountability while ensuring adequate funding so law enforcement can do its job well, and protecting those most impacted by the criminal justice system. Representative Morrison shared about other bills including environmental, food packaging, emerald ash borer management, aquatic invasive species, the lawns to legumes pollinator program, investments to support veterans and preventing suicide and homelessness, restorative justice, and significant Covid and economic relief for essentials workers and businesses hit hard by the pandemic. Finally, she said the tax bill included $1 billion in tax cuts and relief. Representative Morrison noted local projects she was involved in including the Excelsior Commons Restoration, critical water infrastructure needs in Tonka Bay and Minnetonka Beach, funding to Spring Park for critical water infrastructure, and Deephaven to repair a dangerous bridge. She is pleased that the bill to provide funding to address the problematic and dangerous intersection at the entrance to Minnetonka Middle School West (MMW) went through as a grant to Carver County to help rebuild a much-needed roundabout for pedestrian, bike, driver safety, and easing of backups that occur at drop-off and pick-up time. Representative Morrison stated it is an honor to represent the District in the House and asked 60 City Council Minutes – November 8, 2021 3 people to please contact her with any problems, and asked the City Council what their needs are right now. Mayor Ryan thanked Representative Morrison for the work she has done for the local and regional areas. Councilwoman Rehm thanked Representative Morrison for the work on the MMW roundabout noting the City Council gets many emails about traffic safety and a number of residents have been concerned about the Minnewashta Parkway temporary traffic light and the Highway 101 flashing light crosswalk. She asked if Representative Morrison receives emails from constituents about those areas and if the legislature is working on ways to make the City more walkable, bike- able, and safer for them. Representative Morrison replied she does get a lot of emails from across the District regarding traffic safety and Highway 101 and Highway 7 are big areas of concern. She noted many areas are interested in walkability and bike-ability; she is very hopeful that the federal infrastructure package that recently passed will help to make those improvements as Minnesota will get funding. She will be advocating for specific projects and asked the City Council to talk to her offline about those projects the City Council would like to see. Ms. Morrison is planning a town hall meeting on November 20, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. and it will be a water-policy theme. Mayor Ryan asked some of Representative Morrison’s goals going forward. Representative Morrison replied traditionally the second year is the bonding year so there will be a big emphasis on crafting a bipartisan bonding bill. She noted it will be interesting to see how the influx of federal money will impact that. Mayor Ryan said although it is not in Representative Morrison’s district, during the bonding tour there was a stop at the crossroads of 82nd Street for Chanhassen, Chaska, and Victoria. It is on the south side of the Arboretum and they are looking for a road reconstruction as the long-term plan for Highway 5; the only alternative route is 82nd Street. Mayor Ryan asked Representative Morrison for support in funding for 82nd Street, noting there are no funds in Chanhassen to support that type of infrastructure. She noted both Representative Boe and Senator Coleman have been involved in the tour. Mayor Ryan asked if anyone else would like to present. 2. Mack Titus, 2747 Century Trail – Citizen Action Request Mack Titus lives in Arboretum Village and stated buying a home within a community is to invest in that community with the expectation that the Public Works Department and Building Department will conduct professional inspections, in particular of roofing, siding, and driveways. He stated Chanhassen is the fourth community in which he has purchased a home; the first two conducted professional inspections, the third did not, and in his experience to date in Chanhassen, it does not conduct professional inspections. The Public Works Department does 61 City Council Minutes – November 8, 2021 4 not have inspection reports for original or rebuilt driveways for Arboretum Village. Some of the driveways were excluded by ordinance, others were excluded by a public works right-of-way policy that reduces a portion of the driveway eligible for inspection to a small fraction of its length. In Mr. Titus’ case Public Works excludes 31-33 feet of driveway, leaving just two feet eligible for inspection. The building department allowed the Arboretum Village developer to install water dams on the rear roof to channel water away from falling onto a deck. The water dam moved the water to a corner of the building where it cascaded down onto Mr. Titus’ air conditioner; he installed gutters within weeks. Mr. Titus noted the building department did conduct inspections this year of the new roofs installed in Arboretum Village and there were two men taking photos of roofs from street level, but he did not see them go onto the roofs to inspect materials or construction. Mission statements implemented by prior City Councils have permitted slack inspections and Mr. Titus is asking this City Council to restore meaningful inspections by the Building and Public Works Departments. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Resolution 2021-67: Approve Phase 2 Assessment Roll for the Minnewashta Parkway Improvement Project Assistant City Engineer George Bender gave a presentation on the Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation Project Assessment Hearing for Phase 2, noting the asset management of the street and utilities is part of the Chanhassen Strategic Plan. It has been a complex project and included a temporary signal at Trunk Highway 5 in association with Phase 2 construction. He showed a map showing Phase 1 and Phase 2, noting 37 properties were assessed. He said assessments are part of the City’s financial sustainability among other sources of funding for these types of projects; he showed the City’s Assessment Practice on screen, including “benefitting properties.” Mr. Bender explained the bid results and amounts for the project, including the budgeted funding of Municipal State Aid Funds, surface water utility fund, sewer utility fund, water utility fund, and special assessments for a total of $5,254,000. Mr. Bender noted it was a rehabilitation project and not a full reconstruction project which would have driven costs and assessments up significantly. He spoke about the special assessment calculation stating historically within Chanhassen the assessment costs range from $3,000-$5,000 and this project cost came in at $4,080. Mr. Bender walked through adjustments made to the overall bid cost to maintain an equitable assessment amount for the residents. Mr. Bender gave an update regarding the temporary signal at Highway 5, noting the City continues to advocate for the signal to remain until the Highway 5 expansion project begins. The City has received significant support from Carver County and local elected officials, as well as the City of Victoria. Mr. Bender noted recent discussions have been encouraging and Staff remains hopeful that MnDOT will accede to allow the signal to remain until the Highway 5 expansion project is constructed; however, a decision has not been made at this time. The City Council asked some clarifying questions regarding the tonnage of the road, speed and traffic control, and traffic calming. 62 City Council Minutes – November 8, 2021 5 Mayor Ryan made a formal request to the Traffic Safety Committee to collect speed data on that road. Mayor Ryan opened the public hearing. Mayor Ryan closed the public hearing. Councilman Campion moved, Councilwoman Schubert seconded that the Chanhassen City Council adopt a resolution approving the Phase 2 Assessment Roll for the Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation Project. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. GENERAL BUSINESS:None. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS: None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS: None. CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION: 1. Letter from Metropolitan Mosquito Control District dated October 15, 2021 Summarizing Work Done in the Chanhassen Area during the 2021 Mosquito Control Season 2. 2021 Building Permit Activity October Year to Date Mayor Ryan clarified the City Council will continue the Work Session with the remaining items. Councilwoman Schubert moved, Councilman Campion seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. The City Council meeting was adjourned at 7:48 p.m. Submitted by Laurie Hokkanen City Manager Prepared by Kim Meuwissen City Clerk 63 City Council Item November 22, 2021 Item Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated October 19, 2021 File No.Item No: E.2 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Jean Steckling, Sr. Admin Support Specialist Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council receives the Planning Commission minutes dated October 19, 2021." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS Planning Commission Meeting Minutes dated October 19, 2021 64 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 19, 2021 CALL TO ORDER: Vice Chair von Oven called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Eric Noyes, Mark von Oven, Erik Johnson, Doug Reeder, and Kelsey Alto MEMBERS ABSENT: Steven Weick, Laura Skistad STAFF PRESENT: Bob Generous, Senior Planner; and MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner; Erik Henricksen, Project Engineer; George Bender, Assistant City Engineer; Matt Unmacht, Assistant City Manager (former Water Resources Coordinator) PUBLIC PRESENT: Sharon Gatto 9631 Foxford Road Dan Blake Black Cherry LLC, 14500 Martin Drive, Suite 3000, Eden Prairie Jeff and Deb Papke 6180 Cardinal Drive, Shorewood Vice Chair von Oven noted there are four items on the agenda for this evening, however, the applicant for Item B3 has requested that the item be tabled. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR AN INTERIM USE PERMIT (IUP) FOR GRADING IN EXCESS OF 1,000 CUBIC YARDS FOR THE CREATION OF A BERM ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9631 FOXFORD ROAD Project Engineer Henricksen gave a presentation on Planning Case 2021-24. The location is abutting Pioneer Trail and is zoned Rural Residential. The applicant has provided an existing condition survey as the line of trees shown on the property are diseased with rhizosphaera needle cast which is killing the trees. Eventually those trees will be removed which will eliminate the privacy or buffer to Pioneer Trail. There is an existing septic system on site which must be protected during grading operations. The intent is to bring in approximately 5,000 cubic yards of material in order to grade the privacy berm. Commissioner Reeder asked the proposed height of the berm. Mr. Henricksen believes it will be about eight feet from the existing grade and conforms with City Ordinance. 65 Planning Commission Minutes – October 19, 2021 2 Sharon Gatto, applicant, has lived on the property for 30 years and planted 300-400 bushes and trees and with the disease they are losing their privacy. She stated they are hoping to take the berm to the street level and put in trees and plantings to make a beautiful corner. Vice Chair von Oven opened the public hearing. Vice Chair von Oven closed the public hearing. Commissioner Alto moved, Commissioner Reeder seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Interim Use Permit (IUP) to allow site gradings at 9631 Foxford Road subject to Conditions of Approval and Findings of Fact and Decision recommendations. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR AN AMENDMENT TO INTERIM USE PERMIT (IUP) 2021-03 TO AMEND THE COMPLETION DEADLINE, HAUL ROUTE AND STORAGE AREA, BLACK CHERRY DEVELOPMENT, LLC (ERHART) Project Engineer Henricksen gave a presentation on Planning Case 2021-03. The location of the wetland dredging project is west of Great Plains Boulevard and east of Eagle Ridge Road. This is an IUP that was previous approved by Planning Commission and City Council. The property is zoned Agricultural Estate A-2 and has been approved for Preliminary Plat. He noted Wetland 2 is being proposed for the amendment and it is the same ultimate grading plan proposing 21,200 cubic yards of material to be excavated which needs to be completed in the winter months. Due to weather conditions the previous year it was not completed which is why the applicant is requesting an extension of the IUP. There is an amended haul route and stockpile location. Commissioner Noyes asked why there is a change in haul route and stockpile location. Mr. Henricksen replied it is because the Erhart Farms subdivision is going through the process of final platting, construction plans, and build-out so they cannot put the stockpile there. Dan Blake, Black Cherry Development, noted they began work the previous winter. It is about three weeks of work and they got a week-and-a-half of work done and then the weather turned warm. They were at risk of losing trucks in the marsh so they had to stop. He noted this will include two weeks of work in the winter and it will happen pretty quickly. Vice Chair von Oven opened the public hearing. Vice Chair von Oven closed the public hearing. 66 Planning Commission Minutes – October 19, 2021 3 Commissioner Noyes noted they are really just extending the date with the relocation of the haul route and stockpile location. It is pretty straightforward in his opinion. Commissioner Johnson moved, Commissioner Alto seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the amendment to the Interim Use Permit (IUP) to allow site grading by extending the completion deadline to one (1) year from City Council approval, and the haul route and stockpile location subject to the Conditions of Approval and adoption of Findings of Fact and Recommendation. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR SETBACK MAXIMUM SIZE VARIANCES FOR A WATER-ORIENTED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE (WOAS) AND A HEIGHT VARIANCE TO ALLOW A SIX-FOOT, SIX-INCH HIGH OPAQUE FENCE WITH THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD AND SHORELAND SETBACKS ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6609 HORSESHOE CURVE Commissioner Noyes moved, Commissioner Johnson seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission table this item: Request for Variances at 6609 Horseshoe Curve. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR WETLAND BUFFER AVERAGING, WETLAND SETBACK VARIANCES, YARD SETBACK VARIANCES, AND OTHER VARIANCES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE-FAMILY HOME, SEPTIC SYSTEM, AND DRIVEWAY, PID 25.0080200 Associate Planner MacKenzie Young-Walters gave a presentation on Planning Case 2021-20. He clarified that if the Planning Commission approves or denies by less than a ¾ majority vote it automatically goes to the City Council on November 8, 2021. Alternatively, the decision can be appealed within a 4-day window where an appeal received in writing will refer this item to the City Council on November 8, 2021. This is a peninsula on Lake Minnewashta and the variances are from the minimum wetland buffer requirements and from the principal and accessory structure wetland setback to facilitate the construction of a single-family home on the lot. The parcel is zoned Rural Residential, is within the 1,000-foot Shoreland Overlay zone, is riparian, and the zoning district requires a 2.5-acre minimum lot area. Mr. Young-Walters shared the setbacks for Rural Residential and noted the widening of Highway 5 may alter the property’s access; access may be removed or converted to right-in, right-out. Highway 5 is not a City road, therefore MnDOT has jurisdiction over the access. The applicant is aware of all of these elements and development is at their own risk (noise, access, traffic, etcetera). The lot is 2.12 acres in size and the proposal is to extend the driveway and construct a home with porches, a patio, and a septic system. Mr. Young-Walters spoke about buffer averaging through the 67 Planning Commission Minutes – October 19, 2021 4 Watershed to shift the building pad 20 feet south. Buffer averaging is a practice allowed by the Watershed to vary the width of the buffer so long as the total square footage protected does not change. The City does not treat buffers like that but requires a flat minimum buffer width of 40 feet in this case. In order to allow the applicant to use buffer averaging with the Watershed, the City would have to grant a variance from the minimum buffer width standards. Mr. Young- Walters noted six residents have emailed the City expressing opposition to the requested variance; five residents have called (two requesting information and three in opposition). Staff’s assessment is that the applicant has the right to reasonable use of the property and a single-family home is a reasonable use. Staff feels most of the requested variances are due to the proposed home design occupying the entire buildable area. Staff recommends approval of the driveway wetland accessory structure buffer setback and denial of the minimum wetland buffer width and wetland primary structure buffer setbacks. Commissioner Alto asked when the City decided this lot would be acceptable for a single-family home; was that width a consideration with the Highway 5 revitalization. Mr. Young-Walters stated the parcel has been guided for single-family use going back to at least the 2020 land use plan. He does not believe it has been zoned anything other than RR. The City did not amend the land use as part of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Vice Chair von Oven asked if Carver County builds a bridge are they required to provide access to this property. Assistant City Engineer George Bender replied the access would go away and the property would need to be acquired because they would be denying the access to the property that is already established. He clarified if the access needed to be constructed to the bridge because the building was on the site and was not acquired, he expects the bridge would change elevations of the roadway bringing it up so that the connectivity of the wetlands would be established. There would have to be additional funds expended to create a different access to the property. MnDOT has stated it would be a right-in, right-out. Commissioner Alto asked if they approve this application and give them access from Highway 5, could that affect the actual final decision for whether or not they build the bridge for Highway 5 and do the revitalization of the wetland to connect through to the Arboretum. Mr. Young-Walters replied the applicant already has existing and legal access to Highway 5. The City is not granting any new access or any expansion to the existing access. Mr. Bender does not believe it would impact the Highway 5 project. Commissioner Johnson asked regarding the wetland buffer, the septic site is outside of that and asked if that is a viable spot to construct the septic. 68 Planning Commission Minutes – October 19, 2021 5 Mr. Young-Walters replied that the City Code allows for septics to be located within wetland buffers, and there are design standards that would need to be met. Matt Unmacht, former Water Resources Coordinator for the City, performed part of the wetland and natural resources review on this project. He clarified that staff is recommending approval of the driveway variance and not the buffer averaging variances because there is really no way to construct the driveway without the need for a variance at all. It is about what was feasible on the lot. Jeff and Deb Papke, Applicants, stated the driveway would not impact the wetland. Mr. Papke noted the buffer would allow the mound system to leave room to get in the garage. It also allows the distance from the driveway to the house to be shorter and gives an additional septic drain field area on the north side of the house. During the technical review, they found a piece of wetland on the adjacent neighbor’s property that stuck out quite a bit, forcing a bisection of the building location and with the buffers does not allow for a straight line for the house on the east border. Regarding the size of the house, 3,200 square feet is relatively modest and the garage and storage areas are sized for boats, vehicles, and an RV to be stored inside rather than in the yard. He spoke about other properties in the area and about a neighbor who had a variance approved which is a precedent for the Papke’s asking for a large garage on the footprint. Mr. Young-Walters reminded the Commissioners that the variance was approved on the condition that an otherwise theoretically buildable lot was combined to an existing parcel and lost building rights. Mr. Papke noted they submitted the same request to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) and the request was approved. He noted 3-4 of the requests that came from staff are now being suggested for denial by staff. He asked the Commissioners to review and approve the variances as they have been waiting 10 weeks and have lost time in the construction season this year. Vice Chair von Oven asked if the applicants were surprised that the three variances were denied and when did they find out. Mr. Papke replied they found out on October 14th. He spoke with staff about the reasons for denial and they cited the house was big enough and they could do it without having the size of a house they planned for. The Commissioners and the applicant spoke about septic locations. Mr. Young-Walters’ understanding from the Building Official is for a lot of record only one septic site is required. Commissioner Reeder asked if the septic location can be moved. 69 Planning Commission Minutes – October 19, 2021 6 Mr. Young-Walters replied that is out of his expertise but his understanding is that the soils on the site are very constrained and there are quite a few locations restrictions with setbacks, distance from the well, and from the proposed structure. Vice Chair von Oven opened the public hearing. Vice Chair von Oven closed the public hearing. Vice Chair von Oven noted that Commissioner Noyes has recused himself from this discussion for personal reasons. Commissioner Reeder does not see the reason to grant the extra variances. He thinks the Commissioners should grant the variance for the road. Commissioner Johnson is torn; he is on the fence. Vice Chair von Oven said in reading this multiple times, he always agrees that the applicant has reasonable use of the property. This one becomes tough because he stated when one settles on a house they want, that is what they want. Now it is in a place that is going to break a lot of the City rules; however, the Watershed does not have those rules. He is struggling a bit as he does not want to set more precedents for people coming with boatloads of variances. He thinks a reasonable use of a property can be accomplished without the other variances, excluding the driveway variance. Commissioner Alto moved, Commissioner Reeder seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission amend the Conditions of Approval and Findings of Facts and Decision by adding Condition 11: A survey showing the extent of the floodplain musts be provided. If portions of the septic system are within the floodplain, the applicant’s septic design must meet the requirements for septic systems within a floodplain, and if fill is to be added within the floodplain, the applicant must apply for and receive the required permits from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and a Conditional Use Permit from the City of Chanhassen. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. Commissioner Noyes abstained. Commissioner Reeder moved, Commissioner Alto seconded that the Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a wetland accessory structure buffer setback variance for the extension of a driveway, subject to the amended Conditions of Approval, and denies the requested wetland minimum buffer width and wetland principal structure setback variances, and adopts the amended Findings of Facts and Decision. 70 Planning Commission Minutes – October 19, 2021 7 All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. Commissioner Noyes abstained. Mr. Young-Walters clarified if staff receives an appeal in writing by any party, whether the applicant, a resident, or any other participant before 4:30 p.m. on Monday, this would go before the City Council on November 8, 2021. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DATED OCTOBER 5, 2021 Commissioner Noyes noted the summary Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated October 5, 2021 as presented. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS: CITY COUNCIL ACTION UPDATE Mr. Young-Walters shared that the City Council had a work session discussion October 11, 2021 regarding the Westwood Church property. Mr. Generous shared that the City Council requested that the developer hold a neighborhood meeting to get input from residents. The City Council also discussed conditional uses versus interim uses in the fringe business district off Flying Cloud Drive. Staff recommended amending all of the conditional uses to interim uses so eventually they will go away when sewer and water come down to that area. City Council requested additional information on it and then will bring it back for further discussion at a work session. Mr. Generous noted the Council approved the Lakeshore Equipment outdoor storage CUP. Finally, there will not be a Planning Commission meeting on November 2, 2021 as that is Election Day. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Alto moved to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 8:20 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Jean M. Steckling 71 City Council Item November 22, 2021 Item Receive Senior Commission Minutes dated October 15, 2021 File No.Item No: E.3 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council receives the Senior Commission minutes dated October 15, 2021." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS Senior Commission Minutes dated 10-15-2021 72 1 CHANHASSEN SENIOR COMMISSION MINUTES OCTOBER 15, 2021 MEMBERS PRESENT: Jerry Cerchia, Bhakti Modi, Linda Haight, Jim Camarata, Dorina Tipton, Ruth Lunde. MEMBERS ABSENT: Susan Kibler, Lisa Lyon. STAFF PRESENT: Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner, and Mary Blazanin, Senior Center Coordinator. GUESTS PRESENT: Dawn Plumer, Public Health Program Specialist, Greg Pavett, Humanity Alliance. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Commissioner Lunde moved to approve the Agenda. Commissioner Camarata seconded the motion. All voted in favor and the motion carried. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Camarata moved to approve the minutes dated September 17, 2021. Commissioner Lunde seconded the motion. All voted in favor and the motion carried. GREG PAVETT FROM THE HUMANITY ALLIANCE: Commissioner Lunde introduced Greg Pavett. Mr. Pavett is the Director of Humanity Alliance, a non-profit that was established in 2018. They focus on providing improved access to nutrition to people who are food insecure and was inspired by a group of Minneapolis high school students. These students and their families are disproportionately held back by the catastrophic health outcomes tied to food insecurity. They serve communities where food insecurity and chronic disease continue to create barriers that have a lasting impact. UPDATE ON ADOPT A SENIOR: The Subcommittee has had two meetings. They researched organizations, network and support groups, as well as peer groups. The focus is on what the needs are and how to reach the public. SENIOR COMMISSION FUNDRAISING IDEAS: 4TH OF JULY BINGO AND OTHER ALTERNATIVES: This item was tabled to the November meeting. ADJOURNMENT: Chairman Cerchia called for meeting adjournment. Commissioner Camarata moved to adjourn; Commissioner Lunde seconded the motion. All voted in favor and the motion carried. Prepared and submitted by Sharmeen Al-Jaff 73 City Council Item November 22, 2021 Item Receive Environmental Commission Minutes dated October 13, 2021 File No.Item No: E.4 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council receives the Environmental Commission minutes dated October 13, 2021." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 74 Environmental Commission Minutes dated October 13, 2021 75 CHANHASSEN ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 13, 2021, 6:00 PM MEMBERS PRESENT: Kristin Fulkerson, Jeff Harken, Greg Hawks, Scot Lacek, Leslie Elhadi, Markus Fischer MEMBERS ABSENT: None GUESTS PRESENT: Kevin Zahler, Sharon McCotter STAFF PRESENT: Jill Sinclair, Environmental Resources Specialist MINUTES: The September minutes were approved. Water Runoff Initiatives in Minnehaha Watershed District (WD), Kevin Zahler, Lake Minnewashta Lake Preservation Association (LMLPA): The LMLPA is promoting its own grant for water quality projects on Lake Minnewashta. Minnehaha Watershed District has no grant program so the LMLPA partnered with Carver Soil and Water District to create one. Why is runoff management necessary? It leads to cleaner waterways. All of the lakes around here have exceptional water clarity this year. Kevin recently took a Secchi disc reading of 17 feet. Usually a mid-October reading is 3-4 feet. He thinks it’s probably because of the reduced runoff due to the drought. Therefore, it seems that runoff management would help a lot. There is a lot of hardscape in residential areas and all of the runoff can go into the lake and cause eutrophication, which is a lack of oxygen in the water due to nutrient overloading. What can be done? Prevent runoff directly into the lake. Clean up leaves to avoid nutrients from entering the system. Adopt a drain and clean up the leaves, grass clippings and trash before it goes into the pipes. Zebra mussels were established in the lake in 2018. On residential properties management options include installing a landscape lake buffer, rain garden, or rain barrels, or any other means to slow water runoff and filter it through soils and plants. How do you site a project correctly? Determine the grade of the site. Perform a percolation test. Calculate the amount of runoff from the pervious and impervious surfaces. Analyze the soil type. Kevin did a landscape buffer strip on his property in three phases. He installed 725 square feet of buffer and 100 square feet of rain garden. A soil test showed the soil was alkaline and high in phosphorous. He has expanded the buffer and added water plantings this year. What can you do if you don’t live on a lake? Install a rain garden and a rain barrel. Capture the water on site before it runs off. The association hasn’t awarded a grant yet. They’re looking to partner with the City and Metro Blooms to get the word out and offer more services with the grant. Currently there is a $1,000 grant for design and materials. Maybe adding a labor component would interest more people. Commission Presentation with Economic Development Commission (EDC): Jeff presented to the EDC to make them aware of GreenStep initiatives for buy local and energy savings focused on businesses as well as the Forever Ware reusable takeout container promotion. The EDC suggested that Jeff contact the Buy Chanhassen or SouthWest Metro Chamber of Commerce about the programs. Jeff asked if there was a point person on the EDC that could connect with the Environmental Commission in the future. If the Commission would like to work with the EDC, they should a draft plan of partnership. 76 Environmental Commission Minutes – October 13, 2021 2 Forever Ware update: Jill informed the commissioners that there will be a meeting tomorrow with the company and County staff to organize next steps. Jill will report next month on progress. Holiday Article: Leslie agreed to take a stab at writing it this year. Jill will send her past articles. The deadline for copy will be November 9. City updates: • The youth commissioner was appointed: Julia Adams. Her first meeting will be November 10. • Matt Unmacht is the new Assistant City Manager. He had been the Water Resources Coordinator. • Jill asked the Commission to think of creative ideas for the Arbor Day event in 2022. General Discussion: • Minneapolis passed an ordinance to charge 5 cents for bags at stores. Could Chanhassen do that? Consensus was that it would be a long project. • Scot talked to Greg Boe of Carver County and suggested that the Commission take a tour of the Environmental Center. The Commission did a virtual tour of the center in March of this year. Jill or Scot will look into scheduling a tour. • There was an emerald ash borer article in the Chanhassen Villager recently that referenced City efforts against the pest. • Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District – St Hubert project is almost complete; Erhart Farm development is requesting a wetland variance. Meeting adjourned at 7:40 pm Minutes submitted and prepared by Jill Sinclair 77 City Council Item November 22, 2021 Item Approve Claims Paid November 22, 2021 File No.Item No: E.5 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Danielle Washburn, Assistant Finance Director Reviewed By Kelly Strey SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council Approves Claims Paid dated November 22, 2021." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Financial Sustainability SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION The following claims are submitted for review and approval on November 22, 2021: Check Numbers Amounts 176458-176522 $417,224.37 ACH Payments $270,504.22 Total All Claims $687,728.59 78 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS Check Summary Check Summary ACH Check Detail Check Detail ACH 79 Accounts Payable User: Printed: dwashburn 11/12/2021 1:23 PM Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount POST POSTMASTER 11/01/2021 0.00 1,242.41176458 AHLNJAME JAMES AHLNESS 11/04/2021 0.00 130.00176459 ALLSTR ALLSTREAM 11/04/2021 0.00 490.84176460 BOUMED BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 11/04/2021 0.00 324.45176461 BOYSCO BOY SCOUT TROOP 330 11/04/2021 0.00 315.00176462 BS&ASo BS & A Software 11/04/2021 0.00 8,759.00176463 EmbMinn CENTURYLINK 11/04/2021 0.00 1,845.90176464 ChaHer Chaska Herald 11/04/2021 0.00 86.00176465 CHASKA CITY OF CHASKA 11/04/2021 0.00 1,549.36176466 DAKSUP DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP 11/04/2021 0.00 1,013.37176467 FACMOT FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 11/04/2021 0.00 295.42176468 ferwat Ferguson Waterworks #2518 11/04/2021 0.00 30,509.03176469 gonhom GONYEA HOMES 11/04/2021 0.00 27,500.00176470 GRABAR GRAYBAR 11/04/2021 0.00 279.23176471 GYMWOR GYM WORKS INC 11/04/2021 0.00 695.00176472 INDSCH INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST 112 11/04/2021 0.00 9,726.68176473 IndSig Indigo Signs 11/04/2021 0.00 476.00176474 Loc49 IUOE Local #49 11/04/2021 0.00 525.00176475 JohnDon Don Johnson 11/04/2021 0.00 10.00176476 JoneDavi David Jones 11/04/2021 0.00 100.00176477 KnowBe KnowBe4 Inc.11/04/2021 0.00 1,559.70176478 MetGar Metro Garage Door Company 11/04/2021 0.00 1,957.35176479 MinuPre Minuteman Press 11/04/2021 0.00 16.00176480 NCPERS MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 11/04/2021 0.00 112.00176481 MONNTIM TIM MONNENS 11/04/2021 0.00 311.62176482 RooTim Roof Time, Inc 11/04/2021 0.00 1,777.75176483 SHEWIL SHERWIN WILLIAMS 11/04/2021 0.00 647.72176484 Shred Shred-It 11/04/2021 0.00 249.85176485 SouRen Southwest Rental & Sales 11/04/2021 0.00 366.99176486 StanCons Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.11/04/2021 0.00 3,305.75176487 TayEle Taylor Electric Company, LLC 11/04/2021 0.00 4,520.00176488 TFOFIN TFORCE FINAL MILE 11/04/2021 0.00 62.24176489 TheHart The Hartford 11/04/2021 0.00 1,352.98176490 TimSav TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc 11/04/2021 0.00 489.00176491 UnitRent United Rentals (North America), Inc.11/04/2021 0.00 3,105.00176492 WellDaw Dawn Weller 11/04/2021 0.00 100.00176493 AANEKATE KATE AANENSON 11/12/2021 0.00 70.56176494 ARAMAR ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 11/12/2021 0.00 326.57176495 BusSte Steve Buska 11/12/2021 0.00 100.00176496 CENENE CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/12/2021 0.00 1,574.78176497 CenLin CenturyLink 11/12/2021 0.00 64.00176498 ClaGra Claremont Graduate University 11/12/2021 0.00 9,000.00176499 ColTho Thomas Cole 11/12/2021 0.00 100.00176500 COLWMELI Melinda Colwell 11/12/2021 0.00 300.00176501 FerEnt Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 11/12/2021 0.00 24.99176502 GREMEA GREEN MEADOWS INC 11/12/2021 0.00 257.72176503 GreLawr Lawrence Greenspun 11/12/2021 0.00 828.46176504 Page 1AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (11/12/2021 1:23 PM) 80 Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount HartCom Hartman Companies 11/12/2021 0.00 740.00176505 LinHel Helen C Link Revocable Trust 11/12/2021 0.00 5,000.00176506 HENCHE HENNEPIN COUNTY FIRE CHIEF'S ASSN11/12/2021 0.00 364.00176507 KroPro Kromer Company 11/12/2021 0.00 331.12176508 LEAMIN LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 11/12/2021 0.00 20.00176509 LowJen Jen Lowe 11/12/2021 0.00 66.00176510 MagArc Magney Architecture, LLC 11/12/2021 0.00 1,300.00176511 MetHol Metronet Holdings, LLC 11/12/2021 0.00 55.77176512 METCO2 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 11/12/2021 0.00 205,291.66176513 NORASP NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 11/12/2021 0.00 66,260.72176514 NOVSOL NOVEL SOLAR THREE, LLC 11/12/2021 0.00 9,707.88176515 PILDRY PILGRIM DRY CLEANERS 11/12/2021 0.00 449.63176516 RamLak Lakshmi Ramakrishnan 11/12/2021 0.00 220.00176517 SOUSUB Southwest Suburban Publishing 11/12/2021 0.00 1,060.80176518 StiBui Stinson Builders 11/12/2021 0.00 2,500.00176519 TayEle Taylor Electric Company, LLC 11/12/2021 0.00 3,075.00176520 WastMana Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 11/12/2021 0.00 1,272.07176521 WEAWAT WEATHER WATCH INC 11/12/2021 0.00 1,056.00176522 Report Total (65 checks): 417,224.37 0.00 Page 2AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (11/12/2021 1:23 PM) 81 Accounts Payable Checks by Date - Summary by Check User: dwashburn Printed: 11/12/2021 1:25 PM Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check DateVoid Checks Check Amount ACH AFLAC American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 11/04/2021 0.00 39.78 ACH carcou Carver County 11/04/2021 0.00 250.00 ACH ColEng Collins Engineers Inc 11/04/2021 0.00 600.00 ACH engwat Engel Water Testing Inc 11/04/2021 0.00 1,080.00 ACH GOPSTA GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 11/04/2021 0.00 619.65 ACH HANTHO HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 11/04/2021 0.00 1,030.50 ACH INDLAN Indoor Landscapes Inc 11/04/2021 0.00 187.00 ACH InnOff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 11/04/2021 0.00 88.72 ACH KATFUE KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 11/04/2021 0.00 21,181.82 ACH KIMHOR KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 11/04/2021 0.00 59,913.91 ACH MatTri Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc. 11/04/2021 0.00 346.96 ACH HaMeli Melissa Haman 11/04/2021 0.00 11.70 ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 11/04/2021 0.00 21,744.52 ACH NAPA NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 11/04/2021 0.00 343.07 ACH OREAUT O'Reilly Automotive Inc 11/04/2021 0.00 309.24 ACH POMTIR POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 11/04/2021 0.00 2,108.36 ACH MINCON SUMMIT COMPANIES 11/04/2021 0.00 749.00 ACH SunLif Sun Life Financial 11/04/2021 0.00 1,544.39 ACH VERIZO VERIZON WIRELESS 11/04/2021 0.00 4,171.74 ACH WatCon Water Conservation Services, Inc. 11/04/2021 0.00 337.45 ACH WAYTEK WAYTEK INC 11/04/2021 0.00 135.56 ACH WMMUE WM MUELLER & SONS INC 11/04/2021 0.00 174.87 ACH WSB WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 11/04/2021 0.00 5,431.00 ACH XCEL XCEL ENERGY INC 11/04/2021 0.00 27,554.52 ACH ZEEMED ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 11/04/2021 0.00 385.20 ACH BRAINT BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 11/12/2021 0.00 15,500.50 ACH CAMBAR CAMPION BARROW & ASSOCIATES 11/12/2021 0.00 440.00 ACH CCPNIM CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 11/12/2021 0.00 7,202.78 ACH COMINT COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN. 11/12/2021 0.00 2,395.23 ACH InnOff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 11/12/2021 0.00 41.66 ACH KIMHOR KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 11/12/2021 0.00 53,666.91 ACH MacEme Macqueen Emergency Group 11/12/2021 0.00 887.92 ACH Marco Marco Inc 11/12/2021 0.00 1,010.00 ACH MERACE MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 11/12/2021 0.00 1,443.14 ACH METCO Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 11/12/2021 0.00 22,141.35 ACH MNLABO MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 11/12/2021 0.00 4,341.49 ACH MOSBAR MOSS & BARNETT 11/12/2021 0.00 275.00 ACH PRARES PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 11/12/2021 0.00 3,100.00 ACH RBMSER RBM SERVICES INC 11/12/2021 0.00 7,484.08 ACH DaniReem Reem Danial 11/12/2021 0.00 235.20 Report Total: 0.00 270,504.22 Page 1 of 1 82 Accounts Payable Check Detail-Checks User: dwashburn Printed: 11/12/2021 - 1:25 PM Name Check Da Account Description Amount AANENSON KATE 11/12/2021 101-1420-4370 Travel 70.56 AANENSON KATE 70.56 AHLNESS JAMES 11/04/2021 101-1560-4300 Catering 130.00 AHLNESS JAMES 130.00 ALLSTREAM 11/04/2021 101-1160-4300 Mitel Phone System Maintenance 490.84 ALLSTREAM 490.84 ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 11/12/2021 101-1170-4110 Water filter 56.50 ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 11/12/2021 101-1170-4110 Water filter 206.50 ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 11/12/2021 101-1170-4110 Water filter 63.57 ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 326.57 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 11/04/2021 201-0000-4705 Equipment 324.45 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 324.45 BOY SCOUT TROOP 330 11/04/2021 101-1220-4290 Wreaths 110.00 BOY SCOUT TROOP 330 11/04/2021 101-1170-4110 Wreaths 150.00 BOY SCOUT TROOP 330 11/04/2021 101-1370-4120 Wreaths 55.00 BOY SCOUT TROOP 330 315.00 BS & A Software 11/04/2021 400-4117-4703 BS&A Annual Renew and Transactions Fee 6,405.00 BS & A Software 11/04/2021 101-1160-4300 BS&A Annual Renew and Transactions Fee 2,354.00 BS & A Software 8,759.00 Buska Steve 11/12/2021 720-7204-4901 Waterwise Rebate 100.00 Buska Steve 100.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/12/2021 700-7043-4320 Monthly Service 121.35 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/12/2021 700-0000-4320 Monthly Service 20.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/12/2021 101-1550-4320 Monthly Service 38.90 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/12/2021 101-1170-4320 Monthly Service 272.31 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/12/2021 101-1600-4320 Monthly Service 20.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/12/2021 701-0000-4320 Monthly Service 22.38 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/12/2021 101-1370-4320 Monthly Service 191.46 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/12/2021 700-0000-4320 Monthly Service 23.93 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/12/2021 701-0000-4320 Monthly Service 23.94 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/12/2021 605-6502-4300 Monthly Service 21.01 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (11/12/2021 - 1:25 PM)Page 1 of 7 83 Name Check Da Account Description Amount CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/12/2021 101-1190-4320 Monthly Service 630.27 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/12/2021 700-7019-4320 Monthly Service 189.23 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 1,574.78 CenturyLink 11/12/2021 700-0000-4310 Monthly Service 32.00 CenturyLink 11/12/2021 701-0000-4310 Monthly Service 32.00 CENTURYLINK 11/04/2021 700-0000-4310 Monthly Service 15.13 CENTURYLINK 11/04/2021 700-7019-4310 Monthly Service 210.27 CENTURYLINK 11/04/2021 701-0000-4310 Monthly Service 15.13 CENTURYLINK 11/04/2021 101-1160-4320 Monthly Service 250.00 CENTURYLINK 11/04/2021 101-1540-4310 Monthly Service 95.40 CENTURYLINK 11/04/2021 101-1190-4310 Monthly Service 127.20 CENTURYLINK 11/04/2021 101-1170-4310 Monthly Service 851.05 CENTURYLINK 11/04/2021 700-0000-4310 Monthly Service 6.36 CENTURYLINK 11/04/2021 701-0000-4310 Monthly Service 6.36 CENTURYLINK 11/04/2021 101-1550-4310 Monthly Service 30.04 CENTURYLINK 11/04/2021 101-1350-4310 Monthly Service 30.04 CENTURYLINK 11/04/2021 101-1220-4310 Monthly Service 33.04 CENTURYLINK 11/04/2021 101-1370-4310 Monthly Service 50.88 CENTURYLINK 11/04/2021 101-1160-4320 Monthly Service 125.00 CENTURYLINK 1,909.90 Chaska Herald 11/04/2021 101-1120-4360 Subscription 86.00 Chaska Herald 86.00 CITY OF CHASKA 11/04/2021 101-1560-4300 Breaking up is hard to do event 1,549.36 CITY OF CHASKA 1,549.36 Claremont Graduate University 11/12/2021 101-1120-4300 Drucker Playbook 9,000.00 Claremont Graduate University 9,000.00 Cole Thomas 11/12/2021 720-7204-4901 Waterwise Rebate 100.00 Cole Thomas 100.00 Colwell Melinda 11/12/2021 101-1560-4300 Instructor Fee 300.00 Colwell Melinda 300.00 DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP 11/04/2021 700-0000-4150 Materials 408.19 DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP 11/04/2021 700-0000-4150 Materials 605.18 DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP 1,013.37 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 11/04/2021 101-1220-4140 Supplies 295.42 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 295.42 Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 11/12/2021 101-1550-4120 Supplies 24.99 Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 24.99 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (11/12/2021 - 1:25 PM)Page 2 of 7 84 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Ferguson Waterworks #2518 11/04/2021 700-0000-4550 Materials 1,009.03 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 11/04/2021 700-0000-4250 Meters 29,500.00 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 30,509.03 GONYEA HOMES 11/04/2021 101-0000-2072 As-built - 9285 Eagle Ridge Road - Permit 2019-02641 2,500.00 GONYEA HOMES 11/04/2021 101-0000-2072 As-built - 770 Hawkcrest Circle - Permit 2019-02475 2,500.00 GONYEA HOMES 11/04/2021 101-0000-2072 As-built - 9270 Eagle Ridge Road - Permit 2019-02154 2,500.00 GONYEA HOMES 11/04/2021 101-0000-2072 As-built - 9267 Hawkcrest Court - Permit 2017-03089 2,500.00 GONYEA HOMES 11/04/2021 101-0000-2072 As-built - 9274 Hawkcrest Court - Permit 2018-01917 2,500.00 GONYEA HOMES 11/04/2021 101-0000-2072 As-built - 9277 Hawkcrest Ct - Permit 2018-00792 2,500.00 GONYEA HOMES 11/04/2021 101-0000-2072 As-built - 9220 Eagle Ridge Road - Permit 2018-03219 2,500.00 GONYEA HOMES 11/04/2021 101-0000-2072 As-built - 9315 Eagle Ridge Road - Permit 2019-00426 2,500.00 GONYEA HOMES 11/04/2021 101-0000-2072 As-built - 9240 Eagle Ridge Road - Permit 2019-02240 2,500.00 GONYEA HOMES 11/04/2021 101-0000-2072 As-built - 9275 Eagle Ridge Road - Permit 2019-01573 2,500.00 GONYEA HOMES 11/04/2021 101-0000-2072 As-built - 9305 Eagle Ridge Road - Permit 2019-03160 2,500.00 GONYEA HOMES 27,500.00 GRAYBAR 11/04/2021 101-1550-4150 Materials 130.11 GRAYBAR 11/04/2021 101-1550-4120 Supplies 149.12 GRAYBAR 279.23 GREEN MEADOWS INC 11/12/2021 101-1260-4300 Lawn Mowing 257.72 GREEN MEADOWS INC 257.72 Greenspun Lawrence 11/12/2021 101-1120-4300 Lodging 286.66 Greenspun Lawrence 11/12/2021 101-1120-4300 Transportation 541.80 Greenspun Lawrence 828.46 GYM WORKS INC 11/04/2021 101-1530-4530 Preventative Maintenance 400.00 GYM WORKS INC 11/04/2021 101-1530-4530 Equipment 295.00 GYM WORKS INC 695.00 Hartman Companies 11/12/2021 720-0000-2061 2021 Tree Planting 740.00 Hartman Companies 740.00 Helen C Link Revocable Trust 11/12/2021 605-6502-4701 Condemnation Appraisal 5,000.00 Helen C Link Revocable Trust 5,000.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY FIRE CHIEF'S ASSN 11/12/2021 101-1220-4370 Annual Renewal 364.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY FIRE CHIEF'S ASSN 364.00 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST 112 11/04/2021 101-1530-4320 Utilities 9,726.68 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST 112 9,726.68 Indigo Signs 11/04/2021 101-1170-4110 Supplies 476.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (11/12/2021 - 1:25 PM)Page 3 of 7 85 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Indigo Signs 476.00 IUOE Local #49 11/04/2021 101-0000-2004 PR Batch 00404.11.2021 Local 49 dues 343.01 IUOE Local #49 11/04/2021 700-0000-2004 PR Batch 00404.11.2021 Local 49 dues 131.44 IUOE Local #49 11/04/2021 701-0000-2004 PR Batch 00404.11.2021 Local 49 dues 50.55 IUOE Local #49 525.00 Johnson Don 11/04/2021 101-1220-4370 Parking 10.00 Johnson Don 10.00 Jones David 11/04/2021 101-1560-4300 Speaker Fee 100.00 Jones David 100.00 KnowBe4 Inc.11/04/2021 101-1160-4370 Annual Renewal 1,559.70 KnowBe4 Inc. 1,559.70 Kromer Company 11/12/2021 101-1550-4120 Supplies 331.12 Kromer Company 331.12 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 11/12/2021 101-1120-4360 APMP Meetings 20.00 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 20.00 Lowe Jen 11/12/2021 101-1538-3631 Class Refund 66.00 Lowe Jen 66.00 Magney Architecture, LLC 11/12/2021 400-0000-4706 Rec Center Study 1,300.00 Magney Architecture, LLC 1,300.00 Metro Garage Door Company 11/04/2021 101-1220-4510 Service work 1,957.35 Metro Garage Door Company 1,957.35 Metronet Holdings, LLC 11/12/2021 700-7043-4310 Monthly Service 55.77 Metronet Holdings, LLC 55.77 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 11/12/2021 701-0000-4509 Waste Water 205,291.66 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 205,291.66 Minuteman Press 11/04/2021 101-1170-4110 Business Cards 16.00 Minuteman Press 16.00 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 11/04/2021 101-0000-2011 PR Batch 00404.11.2021 NCPERS-Life Insurance 82.41 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 11/04/2021 700-0000-2011 PR Batch 00404.11.2021 NCPERS-Life Insurance 13.54 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 11/04/2021 701-0000-2011 PR Batch 00404.11.2021 NCPERS-Life Insurance 13.65 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 11/04/2021 720-0000-2011 PR Batch 00404.11.2021 NCPERS-Life Insurance 2.40 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (11/12/2021 - 1:25 PM)Page 4 of 7 86 Name Check Da Account Description Amount MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 112.00 MONNENS TIM 11/04/2021 700-0000-4370 Training 311.62 MONNENS TIM 311.62 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 11/12/2021 420-0000-4751 Power Hill Trail 66,260.72 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 66,260.72 NOVEL SOLAR THREE, LLC 11/12/2021 101-1350-4320 Monthly Utilities 153.82 NOVEL SOLAR THREE, LLC 11/12/2021 700-0000-4320 Monthly Utilities 6,272.83 NOVEL SOLAR THREE, LLC 11/12/2021 701-0000-4320 Monthly Utilities 3,281.23 NOVEL SOLAR THREE, LLC 9,707.88 PILGRIM DRY CLEANERS 11/12/2021 101-1220-4300 Cleaning Service 449.63 PILGRIM DRY CLEANERS 449.63 POSTMASTER 11/01/2021 700-0000-4330 October Utility Statements 621.21 POSTMASTER 11/01/2021 701-0000-4330 October Utility Statements 621.20 POSTMASTER 1,242.41 Ramakrishnan Lakshmi 11/12/2021 101-1539-4300 Class 220.00 Ramakrishnan Lakshmi 220.00 Roof Time, Inc 11/04/2021 101-1250-3301 Permit Refund 1,555.75 Roof Time, Inc 11/04/2021 101-0000-2022 Permit Refund 92.50 Roof Time, Inc 11/04/2021 400-0000-3613 Permit Refund 129.50 Roof Time, Inc 1,777.75 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 11/04/2021 700-0000-4150 Materials 323.86 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 11/04/2021 701-0000-4150 Materials 323.86 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 647.72 Shred-It 11/04/2021 101-1160-4300 Shredding Service 249.85 Shred-It 249.85 Southwest Rental & Sales 11/04/2021 720-7207-4410 Rental Equipment 75.73 Southwest Rental & Sales 11/04/2021 101-1550-4410 Rental Equipment 291.26 Southwest Rental & Sales 366.99 Southwest Suburban Publishing 11/12/2021 700-0000-4340 Publishing 190.89 Southwest Suburban Publishing 11/12/2021 101-1410-4340 Publishing 31.82 Southwest Suburban Publishing 11/12/2021 101-1410-4340 Publishing 35.35 Southwest Suburban Publishing 11/12/2021 101-1310-4340 Publishing 91.91 Southwest Suburban Publishing 11/12/2021 101-1310-4340 Publishing 91.91 Southwest Suburban Publishing 11/12/2021 101-1614-4340 Publishing 375.00 Southwest Suburban Publishing 11/12/2021 101-1410-4340 Publishing 35.35 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (11/12/2021 - 1:25 PM)Page 5 of 7 87 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Southwest Suburban Publishing 11/12/2021 101-1410-4340 Publishing 31.82 Southwest Suburban Publishing 11/12/2021 101-1310-4340 Publishing 91.91 Southwest Suburban Publishing 11/12/2021 101-1310-4340 Publishing 84.84 Southwest Suburban Publishing 1,060.80 Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.11/04/2021 720-7025-4300 Cranes Vineyard Design 3,305.75 Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. 3,305.75 Stinson Builders 11/12/2021 101-0000-2072 As-Built - Permit 2019-01779 - 2168 Wynson Lane 2,500.00 Stinson Builders 2,500.00 Taylor Electric Company, LLC 11/04/2021 101-1350-4565 Service Work 4,520.00 Taylor Electric Company, LLC 11/12/2021 101-1550-4300 Services 3,075.00 Taylor Electric Company, LLC 7,595.00 TFORCE FINAL MILE 11/04/2021 400-0000-1155 Delivery Service 62.24 TFORCE FINAL MILE 62.24 The Hartford 11/04/2021 101-1120-4045 LTD November 76.74 The Hartford 11/04/2021 101-1125-4045 LTD November 26.93 The Hartford 11/04/2021 101-1130-4045 LTD November 58.67 The Hartford 11/04/2021 101-1160-4045 LTD November 45.50 The Hartford 11/04/2021 101-1250-4045 LTD November 130.98 The Hartford 11/04/2021 101-1310-4045 LTD November 92.69 The Hartford 11/04/2021 101-1320-4045 LTD November 168.52 The Hartford 11/04/2021 101-1370-4045 LTD November 56.27 The Hartford 11/04/2021 101-1520-4045 LTD November 28.64 The Hartford 11/04/2021 101-1530-4045 LTD November 17.69 The Hartford 11/04/2021 101-1560-4045 LTD November 14.76 The Hartford 11/04/2021 101-1600-4045 LTD November 28.81 The Hartford 11/04/2021 101-1700-4045 LTD November 3.20 The Hartford 11/04/2021 101-1550-4045 LTD November 126.47 The Hartford 11/04/2021 101-1420-4045 LTD November 98.20 The Hartford 11/04/2021 101-1430-4045 LTD November 5.88 The Hartford 11/04/2021 210-0000-4045 LTD November 24.66 The Hartford 11/04/2021 720-7201-4045 LTD November 6.94 The Hartford 11/04/2021 720-7202-4045 LTD November 6.94 The Hartford 11/04/2021 101-1170-4045 LTD November 16.25 The Hartford 11/04/2021 101-1220-4045 LTD November 65.23 The Hartford 11/04/2021 101-1260-4045 LTD November 14.27 The Hartford 11/04/2021 701-0000-4045 LTD November 87.66 The Hartford 11/04/2021 720-0000-4045 LTD November 120.45 The Hartford 11/04/2021 720-0000-4045 LTD November 30.63 The Hartford 1,352.98 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc 11/04/2021 210-0000-4300 Meeting Minutes 489.00 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc 489.00 United Rentals (North America), Inc.11/04/2021 700-0000-4370 Training 135.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (11/12/2021 - 1:25 PM)Page 6 of 7 88 Name Check Da Account Description Amount United Rentals (North America), Inc.11/04/2021 701-0000-4370 Training 135.00 United Rentals (North America), Inc.11/04/2021 101-1320-4370 Training 270.00 United Rentals (North America), Inc.11/04/2021 101-1170-4370 Training 135.00 United Rentals (North America), Inc.11/04/2021 101-1310-4370 Training 135.00 United Rentals (North America), Inc.11/04/2021 101-1550-4370 Training 540.00 United Rentals (North America), Inc.11/04/2021 101-1320-4370 Training 405.00 United Rentals (North America), Inc.11/04/2021 701-0000-4370 Training 405.00 United Rentals (North America), Inc.11/04/2021 700-0000-4370 Training 405.00 United Rentals (North America), Inc.11/04/2021 101-1550-4370 Training 540.00 United Rentals (North America), Inc. 3,105.00 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 11/12/2021 101-1190-4350 Monthly Service 258.38 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 11/12/2021 101-1170-4350 Monthly Service 220.88 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 11/12/2021 101-1220-4350 Monthly Service 83.74 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 11/12/2021 101-1550-4350 Monthly Service 513.37 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 11/12/2021 101-1370-4350 Monthly Service 130.47 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 11/12/2021 700-0000-4350 Monthly Service 16.30 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 11/12/2021 701-0000-4350 Monthly Service 16.30 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 11/12/2021 101-1220-4350 Monthly Service 32.63 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 1,272.07 WEATHER WATCH INC 11/12/2021 101-1320-4360 Membership 528.00 WEATHER WATCH INC 11/12/2021 101-1550-4360 Membership 528.00 WEATHER WATCH INC 1,056.00 Weller Dawn 11/04/2021 720-7204-4901 Waterwise Rebate 100.00 Weller Dawn 100.00 417,224.37 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (11/12/2021 - 1:25 PM)Page 7 of 7 89 Accounts Payable Check Detail-ACH User: dwashburn Printed: 11/12/2021 - 1:26 PM Name Check Dat Account Description Amount American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 11/04/2021 101-0000-2008 October, 2021 39.78 American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 39.78 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 11/12/2021 601-6043-4300 Minnewashta Pkwy Rehab 15,500.50 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 15,500.50 CAMPION BARROW & ASSOCIATES 11/12/2021 101-1220-4300 Testing - Mat Vonbank 440.00 CAMPION BARROW & ASSOCIATES 440.00 Carver County 11/04/2021 101-1210-4300 Background Investigation 250.00 Carver County 250.00 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 11/12/2021 101-1220-4320 October Utilities 120.80 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 11/12/2021 101-1350-4320 October Utilities 3,153.27 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 11/12/2021 101-1540-4320 October Utilities 354.85 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 11/12/2021 101-1600-4320 October Utilities 28.98 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 11/12/2021 101-1550-4320 October Utilities 378.22 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 11/12/2021 700-0000-4320 October Utilities 111.53 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 11/12/2021 700-7019-4320 October Utilities 1,767.86 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 11/12/2021 701-0000-4320 October Utilities 1,287.27 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 7,202.78 Collins Engineers Inc 11/04/2021 101-1310-4300 Chanhassen Bridge Inspections 600.00 Collins Engineers Inc 600.00 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN.11/12/2021 700-0000-4705 Wireless Access Points 1,871.23 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN.11/12/2021 101-1160-4220 Annual SSL Cert Renewal 220.00 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN.11/12/2021 101-1160-4220 Annual SSL Cert Renewal 304.00 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN. 2,395.23 Danial Reem 11/12/2021 101-1539-4300 Zumbra Instructor 235.20 Danial Reem 235.20 Engel Water Testing Inc 11/04/2021 700-0000-4300 Water Samples 520.00 Engel Water Testing Inc 11/04/2021 700-0000-4300 Water Samples 560.00 Engel Water Testing Inc 1,080.00 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 11/04/2021 400-0000-4300 Service Calls 619.65 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (11/12/2021 - 1:26 PM)Page 1 of 6 90 Name Check Dat Account Description Amount GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 619.65 Haman Melissa 11/04/2021 101-1160-4370 Mileage 11.70 Haman Melissa 11.70 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 11/04/2021 400-0000-1155 Lotus Woods Development 147.00 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 11/04/2021 400-0000-1155 Lake Place Apartments 710.50 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 11/04/2021 400-0000-1155 Deer Haven 173.00 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 1,030.50 Indoor Landscapes Inc 11/04/2021 101-1170-4300 December Plant Service 187.00 Indoor Landscapes Inc 187.00 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 11/04/2021 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 30.70 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 11/04/2021 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 13.52 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 11/04/2021 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 12.25 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 11/04/2021 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 39.55 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 11/04/2021 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies - Return -22.68 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 11/04/2021 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 15.38 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 11/12/2021 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 11.11 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 11/12/2021 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 19.28 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 11/12/2021 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 11.27 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 130.38 KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 11/04/2021 101-1370-4170 Jugs 150.00 KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 11/04/2021 101-1370-4170 Fuel 21,031.82 KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 21,181.82 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 11/04/2021 605-6502-4300 TH 101 Reconstruction 53,850.62 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 11/04/2021 605-6503-4300 TH 101 Reconstruction 6,063.29 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 11/12/2021 400-0000-1155 Private Development 994.50 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 11/12/2021 601-6047-4300 2020 Pavement Rehab 8,615.69 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 11/12/2021 601-6043-4300 Minnewashta Parkway Rehab 44,056.72 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 113,580.82 Macqueen Emergency Group 11/12/2021 400-4115-4705 Equipment 863.00 Macqueen Emergency Group 11/12/2021 101-1220-4300 Equipment 24.92 Macqueen Emergency Group 887.92 Marco Inc 11/12/2021 101-1170-4410 Equipment Rental 757.50 Marco Inc 11/12/2021 700-0000-4410 Equipment Rental 101.00 Marco Inc 11/12/2021 701-0000-4410 Equipment Rental 101.00 Marco Inc 11/12/2021 720-0000-4410 Equipment Rental 50.50 Marco Inc 1,010.00 Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc.11/04/2021 101-1370-4170 Fuel/Oil 346.96 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (11/12/2021 - 1:26 PM)Page 2 of 6 91 Name Check Dat Account Description Amount Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc. 346.96 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 11/12/2021 700-7019-4510 Materials 33.26 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 11/12/2021 700-7043-4120 Supplies 31.36 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 11/12/2021 701-0000-4150 Materials 248.29 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 11/12/2021 700-0000-4150 Materials 241.99 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 11/12/2021 700-0000-4240 Safety Clothing 17.98 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 11/12/2021 700-0000-4550 Materials 29.07 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 11/12/2021 101-1220-4120 Supplies 98.94 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 11/12/2021 101-1220-4290 Supplies 37.45 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 11/12/2021 101-1320-4120 Supplies 31.76 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 11/12/2021 101-1530-4150 Supplies 37.09 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 11/12/2021 101-1550-4130 Supplies 30.58 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 11/12/2021 101-1550-4120 Supplies 367.05 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 11/12/2021 101-1550-4130 Supplies 26.95 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 11/12/2021 101-1550-4150 Materials 89.89 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 11/12/2021 101-1550-4510 Materials 121.48 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 1,443.14 Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 11/12/2021 101-1250-3816 October, 2021 SAC -223.65 Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 11/12/2021 701-0000-2023 October, 2021 SAC 22,365.00 Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 22,141.35 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 11/12/2021 101-1250-3818 Monthly Building Permit Surcharge -88.60 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 11/12/2021 101-0000-2022 Monthly Building Permit Surcharge 4,430.09 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 4,341.49 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 11/04/2021 101-1350-4320 Monthly Service 20,809.16 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 11/04/2021 101-1600-4320 Monthly Service 34.48 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 11/04/2021 700-0000-4320 Monthly Service 93.17 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 11/04/2021 701-0000-4320 Monthly Service 403.81 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 11/04/2021 605-6502-4300 Monthly Service 52.04 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 11/04/2021 101-1350-4320 Monthly Service 89.59 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 11/04/2021 101-1350-4320 Monthly Service 36.11 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 11/04/2021 101-1350-4320 Monthly Service 29.28 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 11/04/2021 101-1350-4320 Monthly Service 196.88 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 21,744.52 MOSS & BARNETT 11/12/2021 210-0000-1193 Professional Services 275.00 MOSS & BARNETT 275.00 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 11/04/2021 101-1550-4120 Supplies 27.75 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 11/04/2021 101-1220-4140 Supplies 94.95 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 11/04/2021 101-1370-4140 Supplies - Return -93.84 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 11/04/2021 700-0000-4120 Supplies 98.98 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 11/04/2021 101-1320-4120 Supplies 70.41 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 11/04/2021 700-0000-4140 Supplies - Return -19.06 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 11/04/2021 700-0000-4140 Supplies 163.88 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (11/12/2021 - 1:26 PM)Page 3 of 6 92 Name Check Dat Account Description Amount NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 343.07 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 11/04/2021 101-1220-4140 Supplies 236.44 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 11/04/2021 101-1220-4140 Supplies 12.16 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 11/04/2021 101-1550-4120 Supplies 39.19 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 11/04/2021 101-1420-4140 Supplies 3.78 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 11/04/2021 101-1420-4140 Supplies 7.20 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 11/04/2021 101-1420-4140 Supplies 5.61 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 11/04/2021 101-1550-4120 Supplies -47.05 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 11/04/2021 101-1320-4120 Supplies 23.51 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 11/04/2021 700-0000-4120 Supplies 18.61 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 11/04/2021 101-1320-4140 Supplies 9.79 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 309.24 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 11/04/2021 101-1550-4140 Tires 2,108.36 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 2,108.36 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 11/12/2021 720-7202-4300 Buckthorn Management 750.00 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 11/12/2021 720-7202-4300 Buckthorn Management 1,450.00 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 11/12/2021 601-6043-4300 Tree Removal 900.00 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 3,100.00 RBM SERVICES INC 11/12/2021 101-1170-4350 Nightly Janitorial 3,801.59 RBM SERVICES INC 11/12/2021 101-1190-4350 Nightly Janitorial 3,682.49 RBM SERVICES INC 7,484.08 SUMMIT COMPANIES 11/04/2021 101-1220-4510 Alarm System Inspection 420.00 SUMMIT COMPANIES 11/04/2021 700-7043-4510 Service Call 329.00 SUMMIT COMPANIES 749.00 Sun Life Financial 11/04/2021 101-1120-4046 Life Insurance 30.78 Sun Life Financial 11/04/2021 101-1125-4046 Life Insurance 10.65 Sun Life Financial 11/04/2021 101-1130-4046 Life Insurance 23.60 Sun Life Financial 11/04/2021 101-1160-4046 Life Insurance 18.01 Sun Life Financial 11/04/2021 101-1250-4046 Life Insurance 51.83 Sun Life Financial 11/04/2021 101-1310-4046 Life Insurance 45.74 Sun Life Financial 11/04/2021 101-1320-4046 Life Insurance 57.82 Sun Life Financial 11/04/2021 101-1370-4046 Life Insurance 22.33 Sun Life Financial 11/04/2021 101-1520-4046 Life Insurance 11.33 Sun Life Financial 11/04/2021 101-1530-4046 Life Insurance 7.01 Sun Life Financial 11/04/2021 101-1560-4046 Life Insurance 5.86 Sun Life Financial 11/04/2021 101-1600-4046 Life Insurance 11.49 Sun Life Financial 11/04/2021 101-1700-4046 Life Insurance 1.28 Sun Life Financial 11/04/2021 101-1550-4046 Life Insurance 50.23 Sun Life Financial 11/04/2021 101-1420-4046 Life Insurance 39.24 Sun Life Financial 11/04/2021 101-1430-4046 Life Insurance 2.33 Sun Life Financial 11/04/2021 210-0000-4046 Life Insurance 9.72 Sun Life Financial 11/04/2021 720-7201-4046 Life Insurance 2.74 Sun Life Financial 11/04/2021 720-7202-4046 Life Insurance 2.74 Sun Life Financial 11/04/2021 101-1170-4046 Life Insurance 6.43 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (11/12/2021 - 1:26 PM)Page 4 of 6 93 Name Check Dat Account Description Amount Sun Life Financial 11/04/2021 101-1220-4046 Life Insurance 26.31 Sun Life Financial 11/04/2021 101-1260-4046 Life Insurance 5.66 Sun Life Financial 11/04/2021 701-0000-4046 Life Insurance 34.85 Sun Life Financial 11/04/2021 700-0000-4046 Life Insurance 47.80 Sun Life Financial 11/04/2021 720-0000-4046 Life Insurance 12.31 Sun Life Financial 11/04/2021 101-0000-2011 Life Insurance 623.92 Sun Life Financial 11/04/2021 700-0000-2011 Life Insurance 152.70 Sun Life Financial 11/04/2021 701-0000-2011 Life Insurance 152.70 Sun Life Financial 11/04/2021 720-0000-2011 Life Insurance 10.86 Sun Life Financial 11/04/2021 101-0000-2011 Life Insurance - Cobra 66.12 Sun Life Financial 1,544.39 VERIZON WIRELESS 11/04/2021 101-1220-4310 Monthly Service 40.01 VERIZON WIRELESS 11/04/2021 700-0000-4310 Monthly Service 87.57 VERIZON WIRELESS 11/04/2021 701-0000-4310 Monthly Service 87.57 VERIZON WIRELESS 11/04/2021 101-1550-4310 Monthly Service 464.18 VERIZON WIRELESS 11/04/2021 101-1520-4310 Monthly Service 41.25 VERIZON WIRELESS 11/04/2021 101-1600-4310 Monthly Service 101.65 VERIZON WIRELESS 11/04/2021 101-1530-4310 Monthly Service 41.25 VERIZON WIRELESS 11/04/2021 700-0000-4310 Monthly Service 593.37 VERIZON WIRELESS 11/04/2021 701-0000-4310 Monthly Service 447.75 VERIZON WIRELESS 11/04/2021 720-0000-4310 Monthly Service 180.43 VERIZON WIRELESS 11/04/2021 101-1160-4310 Monthly Service 128.75 VERIZON WIRELESS 11/04/2021 101-1120-4310 Monthly Service 152.85 VERIZON WIRELESS 11/04/2021 101-1170-4310 Monthly Service 36.25 VERIZON WIRELESS 11/04/2021 101-1260-4310 Monthly Service 76.26 VERIZON WIRELESS 11/04/2021 101-1250-4310 Monthly Service 318.80 VERIZON WIRELESS 11/04/2021 101-1310-4310 Monthly Service 173.76 VERIZON WIRELESS 11/04/2021 101-1370-4310 Monthly Service 89.55 VERIZON WIRELESS 11/04/2021 101-1320-4310 Monthly Service 335.85 VERIZON WIRELESS 11/04/2021 101-1220-4310 Monthly Service 692.29 VERIZON WIRELESS 11/04/2021 101-0000-2033 Monthly Service 11.09 VERIZON WIRELESS 11/04/2021 101-1110-4300 Monthly Service 40.01 VERIZON WIRELESS 11/04/2021 210-0000-4310 Monthly Service 31.25 VERIZON WIRELESS 4,171.74 Water Conservation Services, Inc.11/04/2021 700-0000-4550 Service Call 337.45 Water Conservation Services, Inc. 337.45 WAYTEK INC 11/04/2021 101-1550-4120 Supplies 116.13 WAYTEK INC 11/04/2021 700-0000-4120 Supplies 19.43 WAYTEK INC 135.56 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 11/04/2021 420-0000-4150 Materials 174.87 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 174.87 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 11/04/2021 101-1310-4300 2021 GIS/AMS Support Services 273.60 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 11/04/2021 101-1320-4300 2021 GIS/AMS Support Services 273.60 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 11/04/2021 700-0000-4300 2021 GIS/AMS Support Services 273.60 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 11/04/2021 701-0000-4300 2021 GIS/AMS Support Services 273.60 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 11/04/2021 720-0000-4300 2021 GIS/AMS Support Services 273.60 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (11/12/2021 - 1:26 PM)Page 5 of 6 94 Name Check Dat Account Description Amount WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 11/04/2021 701-7013-4300 Sanitary Sewer Televising Video 4,063.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 5,431.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 11/04/2021 101-1350-4320 Monthly Service 18,720.55 XCEL ENERGY INC 11/04/2021 700-0000-4320 Monthly Service -35.98 XCEL ENERGY INC 11/04/2021 101-1600-4320 Monthly Service 18.53 XCEL ENERGY INC 11/04/2021 101-1350-4320 Monthly Service 24.26 XCEL ENERGY INC 11/04/2021 700-7043-4320 Monthly Service 6,502.04 XCEL ENERGY INC 11/04/2021 101-1350-4320 Monthly Service 9.41 XCEL ENERGY INC 11/04/2021 101-1350-4320 Monthly Service 98.02 XCEL ENERGY INC 11/04/2021 101-1350-4320 Monthly Service 32.09 XCEL ENERGY INC 11/04/2021 101-1600-4320 Monthly Service 51.56 XCEL ENERGY INC 11/04/2021 101-1540-4320 Monthly Service 1,406.57 XCEL ENERGY INC 11/04/2021 101-1600-4320 Monthly Service 99.64 XCEL ENERGY INC 11/04/2021 101-1550-4320 Monthly Service -188.83 XCEL ENERGY INC 11/04/2021 701-0000-4320 Monthly Service 671.78 XCEL ENERGY INC 11/04/2021 700-0000-4320 Monthly Service 144.88 XCEL ENERGY INC 27,554.52 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 11/04/2021 101-1320-4120 Supplies 96.30 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 11/04/2021 700-0000-4120 Supplies 48.15 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 11/04/2021 701-0000-4120 Supplies 48.15 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 11/04/2021 101-1370-4120 Supplies 96.30 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 11/04/2021 101-1550-4120 Supplies 96.30 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 385.20 270,504.22 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (11/12/2021 - 1:26 PM)Page 6 of 6 95 City Council Item November 22, 2021 Item Resolution 2021-XX: Determining the City will not Waive the Statutory Tort Limits File No.Item No: E.6 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Matt Unmacht, Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council adopts a resolution determining the City will not waive the statutory tort limits." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND Under Minnesota Statutes, section 466.04, municipal tort liability is limited to a maximum of $500,000 per claimant and $1.5 million per occurrence. These limits apply in the event a claim is filed against the City, against the individual employee(s), or against both. The purpose of these caps is to protect and preserve limited public resources. The League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust, the City’s insurance carrier, requires that the City Council take action annually with regard to tort cap liability limits as cities have the ability to waive tort cap liability limits. The City of Chanhassen has historically NOT waived these limits. 96 DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City of Chanhassen NOT waive our tort liability limits. ATTACHMENTS Tort Liability Waiver Form 97 98 99 City Council Item November 22, 2021 Item Resolution 2021-XX: Accept Donation from Chanhassen Fire Department Relief Association to sponsor an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) File No.Item No: E.7 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Don Johnson, Fire Chief Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council adopts a resolution accepting a donation in the amount of $9,027 from the Chanhassen Fire Department Relief Association to sponsor an Unmanned Aerial Device (UAV) and directs staff to draft a letter of appreciation." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Operational Excellence SUMMARY The Chanhassen Fire Department Relief Association, a 501c.4, conducts an annual fundraiser each year soliciting donations from the residential and business community. Proceeds from these drives have resulted in equipment donations to the city in the past. Examples include a fire extinguisher training unit, an Elegaard device used during CPR incidents, and the firefighter memorial. BACKGROUND This year the Chanhassen Fire Department Relief Association elected to sponsor a Unmanned Aerial Device (UAV) as part of their fundraising efforts. Letters went out to the community in September outlining information about the relief and the focus on the UAV. As proceeds began to come in, the donation to reimburse the City for costs related to the purchase of the UAV was approved by unanimous vote of the entire Relief Association. 100 After the vote was approved, the City completed the purchase of an Autel UAV, Flight Controller, and quick-charging battery system for a total price of $9,027. This request will be for the full reimbursement amount of the purchase price. The UAV will expand the department's capabilities within operations, fire investigations, emergency management, and training. A UAC city policy was approved by the City Council earlier this year. DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION The City Council approves the donation of $9,027 from the Chanhassen Fire Department Relief Association for the purchase of a UAV. ATTACHMENTS Resolution 101 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: November 22, 2021 RESOLUTION NO:2021-XX___ MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A DONATION OF $9,027 FROM THE CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION TO SPONSOR AN UNMANNED AERIAL DEVICE (UAV) WHEREAS, the Chanhassen Fire Department Relief Association, a 501c.4, conducts an annual fundraiser each year soliciting donations from the residential and business community; and WHEREAS, proceeds from these drives have resulted in equipment donations to the City in the past. Examples include a fire extinguisher training unit, an Elegaard device used during CPR incidents, and the firefighter memorial; and WHEREAS, the Chanhassen Fire Department Relief Association elected to sponsor a Unmanned Aerial Device (UAV) as part of this year’s fundraising efforts; and WHEREAS, a UAV will expand the department's capabilities within operations, fire investigations, emergency management, and training; and WHEREAS, the City completed the purchase of an Autel UAV, Flight Controller, and quick-charging battery system for a total price of $9,027. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council hereby accepts the donation of $9,027 from the Chanhassen Fire Department Relief Association to sponsor an Unmanned Aerial Device (UAV), Flight Controller, and quick-charging battery system. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 22 nd day of November, 2021. ATTEST: Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 102 City Council Item November 22, 2021 Item Resolution 2021-XX: Accept Donation from Charter Bank Chanhassen for Annual Senior Center Holiday Party File No.Item No: E.8 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Mary Blazanin, Senior Center Coordinator Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council adopts a resolution accepting a $600 donation from Charter Bank Chanhassen for the 2021 Senior Center Holiday Party to be held on December 14, 2021, and directs staff to prepare a letter of thanks to Charter Bank Chanhassen." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Financial Sustainability SUMMARY Annually, Charter Bank Chanhassen co-sponsors this Holiday event for the Senior Center, allowing us to provide a positive, accessible, community engagement event for our senior patrons. This event is one of our most attended events of the season. BACKGROUND This is the 16th year that Charter Bank Chanhassen has generously co-sponsored this event. DISCUSSION 103 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting a $600 donation from Charter Bank of Chanhassen for the benefit of the 2021 Chanhassen Senior Center Holiday Party on December 14, 2021. Additionally, staff will prepare a letter of thanks to Charter Bank for their generous donation. ATTACHMENTS Resolution Accepting Donation for 2021 Senior Center Holiday Party 104 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: November 8, 2021 RESOLUTION NO:2021-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A DONATION FROM CHARTER BANK CHANHASSEN FOR ANNUAL SENIOR CENTER HOLIDAY PARTY BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL hereby accepts a $600 donation from Charter Bank Chanhassen for the 2021 Chanhassen Senior Center Holiday Party to be held December 14, 2021. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that city staff is hereby directed to prepare a letter of thanks to them for their donation. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 8 th day of November 8, 2021. ATTEST: Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 105 City Council Item November 22, 2021 Item Resolution 2021-XX: Anthem on the Park, Project No. 2016-08 - Accept Public Stormwater Improvements File No.2016-08 Item No: E.9 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Erik Henricksen, Project Engineer Reviewed By Charlie Howley SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council accepts the public stormwater utility improvements in the Anthem on the Park development for perpetual maintenance and ownership." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY Staff has received a letter from Roger Humphrey, the Engineer of Record for the project known as Anthem on the Park, requesting the City consider acceptance of the public stormwater utility improvements in the above-referenced project. The public streets, sanitary sewer utilities, and watermain utilities were accepted by Council on July 22, 2019 via Resolution 2019-35. According to Roger Humphrey, the public stormwater utility improvements have been completed in conformance with the approved plans and specifications. City staff performed a walk-through inspection of the project and found the stormwater utilities are in satisfactory condition. BACKGROUND DISCUSSION 106 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council accept the public stormwater improvements in Anthem on the Park, Project No. 16-08, for perpetual maintenance and ownership. ATTACHMENTS Resolution Accepting Public Stormwater Improvements Anthem Final Stormwater Letter Anthem Location Map 107 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: November 22, 2021 RESOLUTION NO: 2021-XX MOTION BY: _______ SECONDED BY: ________ A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS IN ANTHEM ON THE PARK PROJECT NO. 2016-08 WHEREAS, the City has received a letter from Roger Humphrey, the Engineer of Record for the project, indicating the public stormwater utility improvements have been completed in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and all testing has been successfully completed; and WHEREAS, staff has performed a walk-through inspection and finds the improvements acceptable for perpetual maintenance and ownership. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council hereby accepts the public stormwater utility improvements in Anthem on the Park, Project No. 16-08, for perpetual maintenance and ownership. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 22nd day of November, 2021. ATTEST: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 108 120 South Sixth Street, Suite 1220 Minneapolis, MN 55402-1815 763 / 898 4185 www.graef-usa.com Mr. Erik Henricksen, PE Project Engineer City of Chanhassen Subject: Anthem on the Park, Letter of Specific Compliance Dear Mr. Henricksen: This letter is to notify the City that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the stormwater ponds at the Anthem on the Park project are complete and now conform to the City Standards and Specifications as required per the Development Contract between the City and the Developer, Yosemite Holdings. On Tuesday September 7, 2021, I visited the site and conducted final observations. Along with the project contractor Terry Brothers, we tied into the project benchmarks and we shot elevations of the rock weeper, forebay, and the filled-in temporary bypass. All work substantially conforms to the plans and specifications. I see no other items needing to be addressed and I believe the project is ready for final approval. Thank you again for making this project a success for both the community and its new residents. Sincerely, Roger Humphrey Engineer of Record 109 110 City Council Item November 22, 2021 Item Resolution 2021-XX: Approve Contract with Shadywood Tree Experts for Boulevard Tree Pruning File No.Item No: E.10 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Jill Sinclair, Environmental Resource Specialist Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council adopts a resolution approving a contract with Shadywood Tree Experts for Boulevard Tree Pruning." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Asset Management SUMMARY Each year the City contracts boulevard tree pruning for multiple city streets with the work to be done during the winter months. BACKGROUND Boulevard trees along collector roads are pruned on a scheduled rotation. This year’s scope of work includes pruning boulevard trees along Kerber Boulevard, Century Boulevard and Bluff Creek Drive. Boulevard trees are considered green infrastructure and an asset to the community. Proper maintenance can provide public safety, long-term health, and increased value to the community. DISCUSSION Proper maintenance of city boulevard trees along collector roads requires pruning within a set 111 timeframe in order to encourage good trunk and branching structure. All collector roads with boulevard tree plantings are in a rotating pruning schedule in order to maximize opportunities to promote healthy tree structures within an optimal time frame. Boulevard trees are scheduled to be pruned a minimum of every five years. This year’s scheduled pruning includes Kerber Boulevard, Century Boulevard and Bluff Creek Drive for a total of 571 trees. The contractor works at an hourly rate and the anticipated total will be $30,000 or less. BUDGET This is a planned maintenance activity and not a scheduled capital improvement. The City received two quotes for the work: Shadywood Tree Experts $90/hr/man for 5-man crew Davey Tree $110/hr/man for 4-man crew The funding will come from the City's Forestry Management Fund. The agreement will be set at a not-to-exceed amount of $30,000. RECOMMENDATION Shadywood Tree Experts have been awarded street tree pruning contracts in the past and with good results, therefore, staff recommends the City Council approve the agreement. ATTACHMENTS Street Tree Pruning Bid Specs 21-22 Shadywood Proposal 2021 Resolution - Boulevard Tree Pruning Contract 112 October 21, 2021 SUBJECT: 2021/2022 STREET TREE PRUNING QUOTE The following contains pruning specifications and detail sheets as well as insurance criteria (only needed if we accept your quote). You will receive the quote form in a separate document. The supporting maps and inventories will be able to be accessed and downloaded from the city’s sharefile. The link is provided in the email sent to you. Some highlights of the contract include: Work crew (3-4 members) shall be highly trained and skilled in all aspects of tree service work. Pruning shall be performed by an ISA certified arborist. No work may be subcontracted. Bid should be based on structural, formative and maintenance pruning of street trees. Pruning shall adhere to ANSI A300 Pruning Standards and ANSI Z133.1 Safety Requirements. The written quote must be back to city hall by 4:30 p.m., Friday, November 5, 2021. Emailing a pdf is acceptable. The winning bidder will be contacted by Friday, November 12 so they may get their insurance information and performance bond back to the City as soon as possible. All trimming work must be completed by February 28, 2022. Sincerely, Jill Sinclair Environmental Resources Specialist Enclosures 113 STREET TREE TRIMMING SPECIFICATIONS Work may begin when the necessary insurance is received by the City of Chanhassen and a representative of the contracted company has met with city staff to review the scope of work. Work crew shall be highly trained and skilled in all aspects of tree service work. Pruning shall be performed by an ISA certified arborist. No work may be subcontracted. Bid should be based on structural, formative and maintenance pruning of street trees as noted in the supplied digital files along a total of 3 streets. Streets included in the trimming work include Kerber Boulevard, Coulter Boulevard and Bluff Creek Boulevard. Pruning Objective: For all trees: Appearance is secondary to structural and clearance concerns. The most important concern is codominant stems followed by branches with bark inclusion/weak attachments low in the canopy. Improve branch architecture to create a strong leader and scaffold branching. Maintenance Pruning to reduce hazards and defects. Special attention should be given to branch architecture on trees <10” dbh. The ANSI A300 Pruning Standards should be followed. Pruning goals: Develop or Improve Structure…Select dominant leader(s) and desirable scaffold branches for development as appropriate for the species and site. Subordinate or remove competing leaders, branches and shoots. If necessaryand possible, subordinate larger branches over multiple growing seasons to avoid making cuts with large aspect ratios. Manage Health ….Remove deleterious parts, e.g. dead or dying branches, diseased or infested branches, rubbing, weakened or broken branches, water sprouts. Branches to be removed shall be 4” or smaller. Pruning Specifications for all trees: 1. Unless there is a high risk of branch failure or other strong justification, removal cuts on the main trunk larger than four inches or on branches exceeding ½ the trunk diameter should not be made. 2. Clearance pruning shall be performed to an estimated height which gives 14 feet of clearance over streets and 8 feet of clearance over sidewalks for the next 6 years. 3. Maintain a live crown ratio of greater than 50% at all times 4. Remove or subordinate branches with weak attachments (bark inclusions). 5. The presence of any disease condition, decayed trunk or branches, split crotches or branches, or other structural weakness should be reported in writing to the Environmental Resources Specialist. 6. Remove all suckers and stump sprouts. 7. A thorough clean-up job is expected, i.e., leave the site in as clean of condition as it was before the trimming. The decision of the Environmental Resource Specialist is final. 8. Contractors shall follow traffic control standards per MNDOT Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and will use correct safety procedures including traffic cones, signs and/or barricades, safety hard hats, and ear and eye protection. 9. If a parked vehicle is within an area in which a branch may fall on it, the contractor is responsible for having the vehicle moved. If a vehicle cannot be moved, the contractor will move on to the next tree on the list leaving a written note asking that the vehicle be moved on the following day. 10. No climbing spurs or spikes are to be used. 114 11. Any damage to property, including signs, mailboxes, light fixtures, sod, etc., will be the sole responsibility of the contractor to repair and/or replace. The repair shall be equal to the condition prior to the accident. 12. Any power, cable, phone or other utility lines encountered will be the contractor’s responsibility to have dropped or otherwise appropriately handled. 13. All trimmings or other forms of debris resulting from this project shall be cleaned up and removed from the site by the Contractor on the day the debris is generated. 14. Work within the street right-of-way is allowed only Monday through Friday from 7:00AM-4:30PM. Pruning Objectives - Young Trees (in general 4” DBH or less) Order based on priority. 1. Create or maintain a dominate leader. 2. On a large statured street tree it is the intent that no limbs below 15’ remain permanently. Keep all branches small (less than 2” diameter) using reduction cuts, anticipating removal. 3. Begin raising canopy height for clearance of street (14’) and sidewalk (8’). Pruning Specifications - Young Trees (in general 4” DBH or less) 1. Establish or maintain a dominant leader by subordinating or removing all but one co-dominant stem (may need to be done in two stages if there are more than three leaders). 2. Do not remove more than 15% of the live canopy on trees planted within the last year-only prune to remove major structural defects. On established trees not more than 30% of live canopy shall be removed with the exception of vigorous elms, freeman maple and hackberry where no more than 40% may be removed. 3. Shorten or remove low vigorous branches to improve clearance. 4. To promote trunk growth-if small live branches (1/2” or smaller) exist lower on trunk reduce if needed, but do not remove. 5. Clean the canopy of all dead, broken, and rubbing branches Pruning Objectives – Medium Aged Trees 1. Create/maintain a dominate leader and otherwise promote strong tree structure. 2. Remove or reduce limbs with structural defects such as bark inclusions. 3. On a large statured street tree it is the intent that no limbs below 15’ remain permanently. Keep branches below 15’ small (less than 2” diameter) using reduction cuts, anticipating their removal. 4. Appropriately place scaffold limbs along trunk avoiding clustering. 5. Keep all branches less than ½ the trunk diameter. 6. Reduction cuts should be removing 50%-75% of the live buds on the branch being reduced. Pruning Specifications – Medium Aged Trees 1. Shorten or remove large branches within 18”-36” of permanent scaffold limbs to avoid clustering. 2. Shorten or remove all branches below permanent canopy while maintaining a minimum 50% live crown ratio. 3. Do not remove more than 30% live canopy with the exception of vigorous elms, freeman maple and hackberry where no more than 40% may be removed. 4. Reduce side branches which are greater than ½ the trunk diameter. 5. Clean the canopy of dead, broken, and rubbing branches (beyond 1” in dia.) 6. Address clearance issues (14 feet over street, 8 feet over sidewalk) 115 TREE PRUNING CONTRACTORS INSURANCE The Contractor shall not commence work until all insurance required under this article has been obtained and until copies of policies required by this article are submitted to the Office of the Finance Director, City of Chanhassen, at 7700 Market Blvd., P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, Minnesota, 55317. A)Public-Liability-and-Property-Damage Insurance The Contractor shall take out and maintain at their own cost and expense, during the period from commencement until final completion of the work, such public liability and property damage insurance as shall protect the Contractor, and the City from claims or damages for personal injury, including accidental death and from claims for property damage which may arise from trimming operations, whether such operations be by such Contractor, or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, and including claims arising by reason of any injury or damage sustained after the Contractor has completed the work or vacated the site thereof. 1.Claims under Worker's Compensation, Disability Benefit and other similar employee benefit acts; 2.Claims for damages because of bodily injury, occupational sickness or disease, or death of employees; 3.Claims for damages because of bodily injury, sickness or disease, or death of any person other than employees; 4.Claims for damages because of injury to or destruction of property, including loss or use resulting therefrom. B)The Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless the City of Chanhassen and its agents and employees from and against all claims, damages, losses and expenses including attorneys fees arising out of or resulting from the performance of the work, provided that any such claim, damage, loss or expense is caused in whole or in part by any negligent or intentional act or omission of the Contractor, anyone directly or indirectly employed by them or anyone for whose acts of them may be liable, regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by a party indemnified thereunder. 116 C)Each Contractor shall maintain insurance for Comprehensive Public Liability and Broad Form Property Damage, Comprehensive Automobile Public Liability and Property Damage, Contractual Liability, Completed Operations Liability and Explosion, Collapse and Underground Property Damage. The Provisions must include coverage for Bodily Injury Liability which includes bodily injury claims from the Contractor's employees. Coverage shall be as follows: Workman's Compensation Statutory-Must be for Tree and Chain Saw Work. Public Liability: Bodily Injury/Property Damage $1,000,000 C.S.L. Automobile Liability: Bodily Injury/Property Damage $1,000,000 C.S.L. The above insurance shall provide coverage as follows: Operations of the Contractor All owned, non-owned and hired vehicles The City of Chanhassen shall be provided with a Certificate of Insurance naming them (the City) as an additional named insured with a 30 day written Notice of Cancellation. D)Certificates of Insurance acceptable to the City of Chanhassen shall be filed with the City of Chanhassen prior to commencement of the work. These certificates shall contain a provision that coverage afforded under the policies will not be canceled until at least thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to the City of Chanhassen. 117 ADDITIONAL CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS Delays The Contractor herewith specifically waives claims for damages for any hindrance or delay. Shutdowns due to improper work or otherwise due to the Contractor’s operations, are not causes for extension of time. The Contractor must perform at a productive rate of tree pruning and must maintain the ability to perform at that level throughout the effective period of the contract. Failure to meet these requirements shall be basis for executing the penalty provision of this Agreement; rejection of quote submission or forfeiture of Agreement. Completion of Contract and Inspection After completing the work as detailed in the Agreement, the Contractor shall immediately submit to the Environmental Resources Specialist in writing a billing for the work order amount as a notice of completion of the project. The Environmental Resources Specialist will make final inspection of all work included in the work order as soon as practicable after notification by the Contractor that such work is completed. If such work is not acceptable at the time of inspection, the Contractor will be notified in writing as to the particular defects to be remedied before such work can be accepted. If, within a period of three working days after such notification, the Contractor has not taken steps to promptly complete the work as directed, the City of Chanhassen may without further notice and without in any way impairing the Agreement, make such other arrangements as may be deemed necessary to have such work completed in a satisfactory manner. The cost of completing such work shall be deducted from any monies due, or which may become due the Contractor on the Agreement. If the contractor claims that any instructions, latent conditions or otherwise, involves extra cost under this Agreement, a claim for the extra cost must be submitted in writing within ten days after such obstruction or observance of conditions, and in any event, before proceeding to execute this work, except in an emergency endangering life or property, the procedure shall then be as provided for changes in the work. Claims made after this time, or not made in writing will be refused and no claim shall be valid unless so made. Failure To Comply With Work On Time Should the contractor fail to complete the work on or before the original date set forth for completion in the work order, the City of Chanhassen may permit the Contractor to proceed, and in such case there shall be deducted from any monies due or that may become due the Contractor ten percent (10%) of the unit price for each hour on that work order. This sum shall be considered and treated, not as a penalty, but as liquidated damages. Permitting the Contractor to continue and finish the work or any part of it after the time fixed for its completion, or after the date to which the time of completion may have been extended, shall in no way operate as a waiver on the part of the City of Chanhassen of any of its rights under the Agreement. Neither by the taking over of the work by the City of Chanhassen nor by the termination of the 118 Agreement, shall the City of Chanhassen forfeit the right to recover liquidated damages from the Contractor. If the Contractor should neglect to proceed with the work properly, or fail to perform any provisions of the Agreement, the City of Chanhassen, after written notice to the Contractor, may without prejudice to any other remedy the City of Chanhassen may have, make good such deficiencies and may deduct the cost thereof from the payment then or thereafter due to Contractor. Deductions The City of Chanhassen may withhold from payment to the Contractor such an amount or amounts as may be necessary to cover: a. Defective work not remedied. b. Claims for labor or materials furnished the Contractor or subcontractor, or reasonable evidence indicating probable filing of. c. Failure of the Contractor to make payments properly to subcontractors for material or labor furnished by others. d. A reasonable doubt that the Contract can be completed for the balance then unpaid. e. Evidence of damage to private property. Forfeiture of Contract If at any time the Environmental Resources Specialist is of the opinion that the work is unnecessarily delayed, or is of poor quality and will therefore not be finished within the prescribed time or standard, he shall notify the Contractor, in writing, to that effect. If the Contractor does not take such measures as will, in the judgment of the Environmental Resources Specialist, insure the satisfactory completion of the work, the Environmental Resources Specialist may then notify the said contractor to discontinue all work under the Agreement for this project, and the Contractor shall immediately respect such notice and stop work, and cease to have any rights to the possession of the grounds. The City of Chanhassen may thereupon re-let the Agreement or employ such forces as deemed advisable to complete the work, and charge the cost of all labor and materials necessary for such completion to the Contractor, and the amount so charged shall thereafter become due to the Contractor under and by virtue of the Contract for this improvement. In case such amount so paid by the City of Chanhassen is less than the sum which would have been payable to the Contractor if the Agreement had been fulfilled by him, then said Contractor shall be entitled to receive the full difference and in case such amount is greater, the said Contractor shall pay to the City of Chanhassen the amount of such excess so due. If the Contractor shall assign the Agreement for this improvement without the written consent above required, or shall abandon the work thereon, or shall neglect or refuse to comply with these specifications and the instructions of the Environmental Resources Specialist relative thereto and with the ordinances of the City of Chanhassen, the City of Chanhassen shall have the right to annul and cancel said Agreement and to re-let the work, or any part thereof, and such annulment shall not entitle the Contractor to any claim for damages on account thereof, nor shall it affect the right of the City of Chanhassen to recover damages which may arise from such failure. 119 Discrimination on Account of Race, Creed, or Color Prohibited State law provides that “every Contract for or on behalf of the State of Minnesota, or any county, city, borough, town, township, school, school district, or any other district in the State, for materials, supplies or construction shall contain provisions by which the Contractor agrees: 1. That, in hiring of common or skilled labor for the performance of any work under any contract, or any subcontract hereunder, no contractor, material supplier or vendor, shall, by reason of race, creed or color, discriminate against the person or persons who are citizens of the United States who are qualified and available to perform the work to which such employment relates: 2. That no contractor, material supplier, or vendor shall, in any manner discriminate against, or intimidate, or prevent the employment of any such person or persons, or on being hired, prevent, or conspire to prevent any such person or persons from the performance of work under any contract on account of race, creed or color; 3. That this contract may be canceled or terminated by the City of Chanhassen, or any other person authorized to grant contracts for such employment, and all money due, or to become due hereunder may be forfeited for a second or any subsequent violation of the terms or conditions of this contract (Section 18.022-023 Minnesota Statutes) 120 121 122 123 124 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: November 22, 2021 RESOLUTION NO: 2021-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ENTERING INTO A CONTRACT WITH SHADYWOOD TREE EXPERTS FOR BOULEVARD TREE PRUNING WHEREAS,each year the City contracts boulevard tree pruning along collector roads on a scheduled rotation for multiple City streets with the work to be done during the winter months; and WHEREAS,boulevard trees are considered green infrastructure and an asset to the community. Proper maintenance can provide public safety, long-term health, and increased value to the community; and WHEREAS,this year’s scheduled pruning includes Kerber Boulevard, Century Boulevard and Bluff Creek Drive for a total of 571 trees; and WHEREAS,the City received two quotes for this year’s work and funding will come from the City's Forestry Management Fund. The agreement will be set at a not-to-exceed amount of $30,000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council hereby authorizes entering into a contract with Shadywood Tree Experts for boulevard tree pruning. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 22 nd day of November, 2021. ATTEST: Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 125 City Council Item November 22, 2021 Item Resolution 2021-XX: Authorize Purchase of a Bluetooth Card Reader Technology Upgrade for City Buildings. File No.Item No: E.11 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Rick Rice, IT Manager Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council adopts a resolution authorizing the purchase of a Bluetooth Card Reader Technology Upgrade at a cost of $20,498.20 from Pro-Tec Design." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Asset Management SUMMARY Purchase of a Bluetooth card reader technology upgrade which will replace older City access card readers to enable the use of more secure encrypted access cards, key fobs, and Bluetooth-enabled smart phones. BACKGROUND The City installed its first keyless card access control system as part of the East Water Treatment Plant in 2006. The vendor chosen was DSX Access Systems Inc. This system was expanded in 2015 to include City Hall, Public Works and Fire Station 1. Fire Station 2, Lift Station 24 and the West Water Treatment Plant facilities were added in later years. This system improved the security of City facilities by eliminating the need to manage traditional keys and providing a more efficient method of assigning appropriate facility access to staff and contractors. 126 DISCUSSION The technology used in the older access cards is now vulnerable. These cards can now be easily copied by inexpensive equipment that can be purchased online. The new technology eliminates this vulnerability through the use of encrypted access cards; however, the older card readers in City facilities cannot read these cards. If approved, the older card readers would be replaced with Bluetooth-enabled card readers that are both able to read the new access cards and key fobs, and will also enable access via a Bluetooth-enabled smart phone app. BUDGET Staff identified this security upgrade as one of the technology items in the $400,000 budget amendment for technology, innovation and efficiencies approved earlier this year. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the approval for the purchase of the Bluetooth Card Reader Technology Upgrade at a cost of $20,498.20 from Pro-Tec Design. ATTACHMENTS Resolution - Replacement Access Control Card Readers Pro-Tec Design Upgrade Quote 127 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: November 22, 2021 RESOLUTION NO:2021-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: RESOLUTION APPROVING PURCHASE OF A BLUETOOTH CARD READER TECHNOLOGU UPGRADE FROM PRO-TEC DESIGN WHEREAS,city staff identified our existing access control card readers as a security concern due to the ease of cloning our unencrypted proximity cards and key-fobs; and WHEREAS,a more secure encrypted access card and key-fob technology exists to resolve this issue; WHEREAS,the majority of the city card readers in service at City facilities are not compatible with the new more secure encrypted access cards and key-fobs; and WHEREAS,the Bluetooth Card Reader Technology Upgrade will replace these card readers to allow the use of encrypted cards, key-fobs and Bluetooth enabled smart phones; and WHEREAS,Staff identified this security upgrade as one of the technology items in the $400,000 budget amendment for technology, innovation and efficiencies approved earlier this year; and WHEREAS,the proposal quote received from Pro-tec Design for the purchase the Bluetooth Card Reader Technology Upgrade is a Minnesota Statewide Enterprise agreement which fulfills the requirements of the city purchasing policy. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, approves the purchase of the Bluetooth Card Reader Technology Upgrade at a cost of $20,498.20 from Pro-Tec Design. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 22nd day of November, 2021. ATTEST: Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 128 Proposal Sold To:City of Chanhassen Ship To:City of Chanhassen Richard Rice Richard Rice 7700 Market Blvd Chanhassen, MN 55317 United States 7700 Market Blvd Chanhassen, MN 55317 United States Phone:Phone: Fax:Fax: Email:rrice@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Email:rrice@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Bluetooth Card Reader Technology Upgrade The following proposal outlines the necessary items for the upgrade of card readers to a technology that can read standard proximity (current City technology), smart cards, as well as bluetooth credentials. The proposal has been broken down by facility and takes into account the number of readers in each. Proposal follows state contract S-813(5) guidelines. Date Quote Valid For Quote #Rep Terms 11/01/21 30 days PTDQ26783-03 Tim Ferrian Net 30 days Description Unit Price Ext. PriceLineQty 1 City Hall 2 21 $221.20 $4,645.20CARD READER,SIGNO,W ALL MOUNT, SEOS, ICLASS AND PROX, OSDP/W EIGAND OUTPUT, MOBILE READY 3 21 $10.00 $210.00MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 4 21 $1.92 $40.32SHIPPING 5 21 $5.56 $116.76WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 6 2 $95.00 $190.00ENG DESIGN SERVICES 7 31 $102.00 $3,162.00STATE CONTRACT- INSTALLATION AND PROGRAMMING 8 4 $95.00 $380.00CAD DESIGN SERVICES - DRAW INGS AND DOCUMENTATION AND SYSTEM DESIGN 9 6 $102.00 $612.00PROJECT MANAGMENT - SCHEDULE, MOBILIZE, AND QC 10 $9,546.28 SubTotal 11 12 Fire Station 1 13 2 $221.20 $442.40CARD READER,SIGNO,W ALL MOUNT, SEOS, ICLASS AND PROX, OSDP/W EIGAND OUTPUT, MOBILE READY 14 2 $10.00 $20.00MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 15 2 $1.92 $3.84SHIPPING 16 2 $5.56 $11.12WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 17 2 $95.00 $190.00ENG DESIGN SERVICES 18 4 $102.00 $408.00STATE CONTRACT- INSTALLATION AND PROGRAMMING 19 1 $95.00 $95.00CAD DESIGN SERVICES - DRAW INGS AND DOCUMENTATION AND SYSTEM DESIGN 20 1 $102.00 $102.00PROJECT MANAGMENT - SCHEDULE, MOBILIZE, AND QC 5929 Baker Road - Suite #400 - Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone: 763-553-1477 - Fax: 763-233-6855 solutions@pro-tecdesign.com - www.pro-tecdesign.com Page 1 1 of 6 129 21 $1,462.36 SubTotal 22 23 Public Works (13 readrs at site but 6 are already signo) 24 7 $221.20 $1,548.40CARD READER,SIGNO,W ALL MOUNT, SEOS, ICLASS AND PROX, OSDP/W EIGAND OUTPUT, MOBILE READY 25 7 $10.00 $70.00MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 26 7 $1.92 $13.44SHIPPING 27 7 $5.56 $38.92WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 28 2 $95.00 $190.00ENG DESIGN SERVICES 29 11 $102.00 $1,122.00STATE CONTRACT- INSTALLATION AND PROGRAMMING 30 1 $95.00 $95.00CAD DESIGN SERVICES - DRAW INGS AND DOCUMENTATION AND SYSTEM DESIGN 31 1 $102.00 $102.00PROJECT MANAGMENT - SCHEDULE, MOBILIZE, AND QC 32 $3,369.76 SubTotal 33 34 EWTP 35 2 $221.20 $442.40CARD READER,SIGNO,W ALL MOUNT, SEOS, ICLASS AND PROX, OSDP/W EIGAND OUTPUT, MOBILE READY 36 2 $10.00 $20.00MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 37 2 $1.92 $3.84SHIPPING 38 2 $5.56 $11.12WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 39 2 $95.00 $190.00ENG DESIGN SERVICES 40 4 $102.00 $408.00STATE CONTRACT- INSTALLATION AND PROGRAMMING 41 1 $95.00 $95.00CAD DESIGN SERVICES - DRAW INGS AND DOCUMENTATION AND SYSTEM DESIGN 42 1 $102.00 $102.00PROJECT MANAGMENT - SCHEDULE, MOBILIZE, AND QC 43 $1,462.36 SubTotal 44 45 Fire Station 2 46 2 $221.20 $442.40CARD READER,SIGNO,W ALL MOUNT, SEOS, ICLASS AND PROX, OSDP/W EIGAND OUTPUT, MOBILE READY 47 2 $10.00 $20.00MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 48 2 $1.92 $3.84SHIPPING 49 2 $5.56 $11.12WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 50 2 $95.00 $190.00ENG DESIGN SERVICES 51 4 $102.00 $408.00STATE CONTRACT- INSTALLATION AND PROGRAMMING 52 1 $95.00 $95.00CAD DESIGN SERVICES - DRAW INGS AND DOCUMENTATION AND SYSTEM DESIGN 53 1 $102.00 $102.00PROJECT MANAGMENT - SCHEDULE, MOBILIZE, AND QC 54 $1,462.36 SubTotal 55 56 WWTP 57 6 $221.20 $1,327.20CARD READER,SIGNO,W ALL MOUNT, SEOS, ICLASS AND PROX, OSDP/W EIGAND OUTPUT, MOBILE READY 58 6 $10.00 $60.00MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 59 6 $1.92 $11.52SHIPPING 60 6 $5.56 $33.36WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 61 2 $88.00 $176.00ENG DESIGN SERVICES 62 13 $95.00 $1,235.00STATE CONTRACT- INSTALLATION AND PROGRAMMING 63 1 $88.00 $88.00CAD DESIGN SERVICES - DRAW INGS AND DOCUMENTATION AND SYSTEM DESIGN 5929 Baker Road - Suite #400 - Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone: 763-553-1477 - Fax: 763-233-6855 solutions@pro-tecdesign.com - www.pro-tecdesign.com Page 2 2 of 6 130 64 1 $88.00 $88.00PROJECT MANAGMENT - SCHEDULE, MOBILIZE, AND QC 65 $3,195.08 SubTotal 66 Total $20,498.20 5929 Baker Road - Suite #400 - Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone: 763-553-1477 - Fax: 763-233-6855 solutions@pro-tecdesign.com - www.pro-tecdesign.com Page 3 3 of 6 131 Statement of Work 1. PTD to provide and install the solution described above. 2. PTD to provide a 1 year material and labor warranty on the proposed solution. Exclusions 1. Proposal assumes that the City already has mobile credentials in use. No credentials have been proposed here. Thank you again for giving me the opportunity to provide you with this information. If you should need any further clarification or assistance, don't hesitate to contact me! To proceed with the proposal, please sign the Proposal Acceptance portion of the proposal and return to me. Tim Ferrian 5929 Baker Road, Suite 400 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Email tferrian@pro-tecdesign.com Office (763) 231-8617 Cell (763) 370-7115 Fax (763) 233-6855 5929 Baker Road - Suite #400 - Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone: 763-553-1477 - Fax: 763-233-6855 solutions@pro-tecdesign.com - www.pro-tecdesign.com Page 4 4 of 6 132 PROPOSAL ACCEPTANCE Bluetooth Card Reader Technology Upgrade PTDQ26783-03 11/1/2021 City of Chanhassen Richard Rice 7700 Market Blvd Chanhassen, MN 55317 United States City of Chanhassen Printed Name and Title: Signature:Date: PO# / Reference # (optional): Pro-Tec Design, Inc. Printed Name and Title:Tim Ferrian Senior Business Development Manager Signature:11/1/2021Date: 5929 Baker Road - Suite #400 - Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone: 763-553-1477 - Fax: 763-233-6855 solutions@pro-tecdesign.com - www.pro-tecdesign.com Page 5 5 of 6 133 Standard Terms and Conditions FINANCIAL 1. No provisions of this Proposal/Contract shall serve to void our rights under Mechanics' Lien Laws. 2. W e do not accept back charges that have not been previously agreed to by us in writing. 3. Late payments of 60 days or more will bear interest at the standard prevailing commercial rate 4. Unless otherwise specified, you will be billed for 30% of the project total immediately after the receipt of an order. Prompt payment is required to order parts and cover other costs associated with project start-up. 5. Progress billings will be issued monthly and unless specified in a separate contract all payments are due net 30. 6. Nothing in this Proposal/Contract shall be construed to require us to continue performance of work if we do not receive timely payment for properly performed work and suitably stored materials. 7. W e retain title to all equipment until installation is complete and all payments due Pro-Tec Design have been paid in full. W e reserve the right to retake possession of the same or any part thereof at your cost if default is made by you in any payment. If customer fails to follow the payment schedule(s) above or if Pro-Tec Design anticipates Customer may be unable to perform hereunder, Pro-Tec Design may terminate this contract, defer, discontinue or suspend work, or demand adequate assurance of Customer's performance. If a Customer's account must be placed with an attorney for collection, whether a lawsuit is filed or otherwise, or if the services of an attorney are required to protect Pro-Tec Design's interest, Customer agrees to pay all collection costs, including reasonable attorney's fees. 8. Alterations or modifications of the original quotation or specifications, including changes in quantity, material, design or other features, must be communicated in writing by Customer to Pro-Tec Design and accepted by Pro-Tec Design in writing, it being understood any change may increase prices. Customer shall be liable for an reimburse Pro-Tec Design for any and all work in process at the time of Pro-Tec Design's receipt of notice of changes. SITE CONDITIONS AND W ORK PERFORMANCE 9. W e are not responsible for protection of our work in place. 10. W e will dispose of debris created by our work into Owner-furnished trash bins or container at the site. 11. You shall furnish and make available to us at the site reasonable storage and parking facilities, and convenient delivery access to our work. 12. You shall provide uncluttered and safe access for us to perform our work. The schedule of any other contractors involved in this project shall be made in consultation with us, and unless otherwise agreed to, shall provide time for us to perform our work on an 8-hour day, 40-hour week basis. This Proposal/Contract does not include provision for our being required to perform overtime work for any reasons unless otherwise stated. An additional charge to the contract shall be made for any mutually agreed upon overtime. 13. W e are not responsible for delays or defaults that are occasioned by causes of any kind beyond our control, Including but not limited to delays or defaults of Architects, the Owner, the Contractor, any Subcontractors, other third parties, civil disorders, labor disputes, and Acts of God. W e shall be entitled to equitable adjustment for delays caused by any Architect, Engineer, Contractor, or Owner. 14. If any drawings, Illustrations, or descriptive matter are furnished with this Proposal/Contract, they are approximate and submitted only to show the general style, arrangement, and dimensions of equipment offered. 15. All work will be done during standard business hours, Monday through Friday unless otherwise noted. WARRANTY 16. No liquidated damages will be due. 17. THERE ARE NO WARRANTIES THAT EXTEND BEYOND PRO-TEC DESIGN'S STATED SPECIFICATIONS. PRO-TEC SPECIFICALLY EXCLUDES ALL W ARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING ANY IMPLIED W ARRANTY FO MERCHANTIBILITY, IMPLIED W ARRANTY OF FITNESS, IMPLIED WARRANTY OF DESIGN, AND ALL OTHER IMPLIED W ARRANTIES. Customer's sole remedy in any action at law based hereunder (other than an action based on breach of warranty, which warranties are expressly excluded except as set forth herein) shall be limited to the repair or replacement of nonconforming goods ore parts, or, at Pro-Tec Design's option, refund of the applicable quote. IN NO EVENT SHALL PRO-TEC DESIGN BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY CONSEQUENTIAL ORE ECONOMIC DAMAGES OR LOSS, LOST PROFITS OR CONSEQUENTIALDAMAGES FOR PERSONAL INJURY. CUSTOMER AGREES THAT THIS PROVISION IS CONSCIONABLE. 18. Pro-Tec Design will warranty the labor and materials covered under this quotation for one year from the date of first beneficial use of the system provided the Owner is current in their payments to Pro-Tec Design, Inc. Accounts that are not current shall not receive warranty work until said accounts are made current. Pro-Tec Design will respond during normal business hours Monday through Friday. Weekends, Holidays and after hours warranty support will be billable at standard overtime rates. Warranty does not include replacement or repair of equipment damaged by Misuse, Negligence, Over or Under Voltage, or "Acts of God" such as lightning or other weather related incidents. W arranty only covers the repair or replacement of any parts supplied by Pro-Tec and any labor and travel to and from the site to execute said repairs for one (1) year from the date the Owner has beneficial use of the system. No warranty is extended to not in contract (NIC) equipment. NIC equipment is defined as any equipment not supplied by Pro-Tec or existing equipment that is re-used. The troubleshooting, repair or replacement of NIC equipment will be provided by Pro-Tec at a time and materials basis. 19. Pro-Tec Design Is not an insurer of Customer's risks and exposures, Pro-Tec shall not be liable for any failure to perform under this Agreement due to any "Act of God," "Force Majeure," of another cause beyond Pro-Tec Design's control. Pro-Tec Design shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused in whole or in part from negligence, fault, or wrongful act of Customer or of any third persons or parties. Services provided under this Agreement are for the sole benefit of the Customer and no rights are, or may be, conferred on any other party as a third-party beneficiary, by transfer or assignment, or otherwise. Pro-Tec Design's total liability is limited to the contract price; as matter of law, this limitation does not apply to fraud, willful injury, or willful violation of the law. OTHER 20. This Proposal/Contract, including the provisions printed above and any specifications or other provisions attached hereto, when accepted by you and Pro-Tec Design shall constitute the Contract between us, and all prior representations or agreements not incorporated herein are superseded. Any terms or conditions contained in any Customer proposal/contract/purchase order are expressly rejected and shall not bind Pro-Tec Design or affect or invalidate any terms contained herein. Terms and conditions herein shall not be modified except upon Pro-Tec Design's express written agreement. 21. This Proposal/Contract shall be interpreted and governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. Any disputes arising out of business conduced hereunder shall be venued in the district court of the State of Minnesota. In case of dispute, the prevailing party shall be awarded reasonable attorney's fees. 22. The design and/or intent of the items listed in this system specification is considered intellectual property and owned by Pro-Tec Design and will not be disclosed to any party other than those intended by Pro-Tec Design. Disclosure of this design/intent will subject the discloser to Consultant Fees equivalent of the above listed design/build quotation. 23. Customer agrees that during the term of this contract and for two years following termination, they will not directly or indirectly solicit for hire nor contract for services any employee who performs services hereunder without Pro-Tec Design's written consent 24. This proposal and any documents associated with it supersede any prior verbal or written information provided. 5929 Baker Road - Suite #400 - Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone: 763-553-1477 - Fax: 763-233-6855 solutions@pro-tecdesign.com - www.pro-tecdesign.com Page 6 6 of 6 134 City Council Item November 22, 2021 Item Approve Temporary On-Sale Liquor License to Rotary Club of Chanhassen for February Festival on February 5 at Lake Ann Park File No.Item No: E.12 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the request from the Rotary Club of Chanhassen for a temporary on-sale intoxicating liquor license to sell alcoholic beverages at the February Festival on February 5 or 6, 2021 on Lake Ann. The fee for said license shall be $1." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY The Rotary Club of Chanhassen has submitted an application for a temporary on-sale intoxicating liquor license for the annual February Festival on February 5, 2021 (or February 6, 2021, if February 5 is cancelled due to weather) on Lake Ann. They plan to sell alcoholic beverages on the ice. The Rotary has submitted liquor liability insurance covering this event. BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET 135 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Rotary Club of Chanhassen’s request for a temporary on-sale liquor license for the February Festival on Saturday, February 5, 2021 (or February 6, 2021 if February 5 is cancelled due to weather) on Lake Ann. The fee is $1. ATTACHMENTS Temporary Liquor License Application Location Map Certificate of Insurance 136 Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 1600, St. Paul, MN 55101 651-201-7507 Fax 651-297-5259 TTY 651-282-6555 APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR A 1 DAY TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE Name of organization Date organized Tax exempt number Address City State Zip Code Name of person making application Business phone Home phone Date(s) of event Club Charitable Religious Other non-profit Type of organization Organization officer's name City State Zip Code Organization officer's name City State Zip Code Organization officer's name City State Zip Code Location where permit will be used. If an outdoor area, describe. If the applicant will contract for intoxicating liquor service give the name and address of the liquor license providing the service. If the applicant will carry liquor liability insurance please provide the carrier's name and amount of coverage. City or County approving the license Date Approved Fee Amount Permit Date Date Fee Paid Signature City Clerk or County Official APPROVAL APPLICATION MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMITTING TO ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT City or County E-mail Address City or County Phone Number CLERKS NOTICE: Submit this form to Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 30 days prior to event. ONE SUBMISSION PER EMAIL, APPLICATION ONLY. PLEASE PROVIDE A VALID E-MAIL ADDRESS FOR THE CITY/COUNTY AS ALL TEMPORARY PERMIT APPROVALS WILL BE SENT BACK VIA EMAIL. E-MAIL THE APPLICATION SIGNED BY CITY/COUNTY TO AGE.TEMPORARYAPPLICATION@STATE.MN.US Microdistillery Small Brewer Please Print Name of City Clerk or County Official 137 sell here 138 139 City Council Item November 22, 2021 Item Approve Subordination Agreement with Bridgewater Bank for Chanhassen Gateway Place (721 Lake Susan Drive) File No.EDA 81 Item No: E.13 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council authorizes entering into a Subordination Agreement with Bridgewater Bank for Chanhassen Gateway Place (721 Lake Susan Drive)." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND During the development of the Gateway Place housing in 2006, the City received a $300,000 LHIA grant from the Met Council. The city loaned these funds to the project. The loan is due on 12/31/2036. The project is refinancing and has requested that the city sign the subordination agreement with the lender, Bridgewater Bank. The City Attorney has reviewed the document and deemed it acceptable for the City's purposes. DISCUSSION 140 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval to enter into the agreement. ATTACHMENTS Subordination Agreement, Gateway Place 141 Subordination Agreement 2425841.v1 SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT THIS SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is entered into this ____ day of January, 2022, by and among BRIDGEWATER BANK, a Minnesota banking corporation (“Senior Lender”), and the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the “Subordinate Lender”). RECITALS A.CHANHASSEN GATEWAY PLACE, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“Borrower”) is the owner of certain land located at 721 Lake Susan Drive, in Chanhassen, Minnesota, and legally described in Exhibit A (“Land”). The Land is improved with a multifamily building (“Improvements” together with the Land shall be collectively referred to as the, “Mortgaged Property”). B.Senior Lender has agreed to extend a loan in the original principal amount of $3,400,000.00 to the Borrower (the “Senior Loan”), which is evidenced pursuant to a Promissory Note executed by the Borrower in favor of Senior Lender in the amount of $3,400,000.00 (the “Senior Note”), the proceeds of which shall be disbursed to Borrower pursuant to the terms of a Loan Agreement by and between Borrower and Senior Lender of even date herewith (the “Senior Loan Agreement”), in connection with the Mortgaged Property. The Senior Loan is secured in part by a Combination Mortgage, Security Agreement, Fixture Filing and Assignment of Leases and Rents of even date herewith executed by the Borrower in favor of the Senior Lender, encumbering the Mortgaged Property (the “Senior Mortgage”). C.Pursuant to an Inclusionary Housing Account Promissory Note dated as of June 14, 2006 executed by the Borrower in favor of the Subordinate Lender (the “Subordinate Note”), the Subordinate Lender made a loan to Borrower in the original principal amount of $300,000.00 (“Subordinate Loan”). The Subordinate Loan is secured by an Inclusionary Housing Account Mortgage dated June 14, 2006 executed by the Borrower in favor of the Subordinate Lender, encumbering the Mortgaged Property, recorded on October 6, 2006 with the Carver County Recorder’s Office as Document No. A451296 (the “Subordinate Mortgage”). 142 Subordination Agreement Page 2 D.The execution and delivery of this Agreement is a condition of Senior Lender consenting to the Subordinate Loan. NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1.Definitions. The following terms, when used in this Agreement (including, as appropriate, when used in the above recitals), will have the following meanings. (a)The terms used in this Agreement and not otherwise defined in this Agreement, will have the meanings given to those terms in the Senior Loan Agreements. (b)“Bankruptcy Proceeding” means any bankruptcy, reorganization, insolvency, composition, restructuring, dissolution, liquidation, receivership, assignment for the benefit of creditors, or custodianship action or proceeding under any federal or state law with respect to Borrower, any guarantor of any of the Senior Indebtedness, any of their respective properties, or any of their respective partners, members, officers, directors, or shareholders. (c)“Borrower” means all persons or entities identified as “Borrower” in the first Recital of this Agreement, together with their successors and assigns, and any other person or entity who acquires title to the Mortgaged Property after the date of this Agreement; provided that the term “Borrower” will not include Senior Lender if Senior Lender acquires title to the Mortgaged Property. (d)“Enforcement Action” means any of the following actions taken by or at the direction of any Subordinate Lender: the acceleration of all or any part of any Subordinate Indebtedness, the advertising of or commencement of any UCC sale, the obtaining of or seeking of the appointment of a receiver, the seeking of default interest, the taking of possession or control of any of the Mortgaged Property, the commencement of any suit or other legal, administrative, or arbitration proceeding based upon any SubordinateNote or any other of the Subordinate Loan Documents, the exercising of any banker’s lien or rights of set-off or recoupment, or the exercise of any other remedial action against Borrower, any other party liable for any Subordinate Indebtedness (including any guarantor of any of the Subordinate Indebtedness) or obligated under any Subordinate Loan Documents. (e)“Enforcement Action Notice” means a written Notice from any Subordinate Lender to Senior Lender, given following any one or more Subordinate Loan Default(s) and the expiration of any Notice or cure periods provided for such Subordinate Loan Default(s) in the applicable Subordinate Loan Documents, setting forth in reasonable detail such Subordinate Loan Default(s) and the Enforcement Actions proposed to be taken by Subordinate Lender. (f)“Notice” is defined in Section 6(d). 143 Subordination Agreement Page 3 (g)“Senior Indebtedness” means all sums evidenced or secured or guaranteed by, or otherwise due and payable to Senior Lender pursuant to, the Senior Loan Documents. (h)“Senior Lender” means the person or entity named as such in the first paragraph of this Agreement, and any other person or entity that becomes the legal holder of the Senior Notes after the date of this Agreement. (i)“Senior Loan Default” means any act, failure to act, event, condition, or occurrence which constitutes, or which with the giving of Notice or the passage of time, or both, would constitute, an “Event of Default” as defined in the Senior Loan Documents. (j)“Senior Loan Documents” means the “Loan Documents” collectively as defined in the Senior Loan Agreement. (k)“Subordinate Indebtedness means all sums evidenced or secured or guaranteed by, or otherwise due and payable to the Subordinate Lender pursuant to, the Subordinate Loan Documents. (l)“Subordinate Lender” means the Subordinate Lender and any other person or entity who becomes the legal holder of the Subordinate Note after the date of this Agreement. (m)“Subordinate Loan Default” means any act, failure to act, event, condition, or occurrence which allows (but for any contrary provision of this Agreement), or which with the giving of Notice or the passage of time, or both, would allow (but for any contrary provision of this Agreement), the Subordinate Lender to take an Enforcement Action; provided, however, that for purposes of this Agreement, no Subordinate Loan Default shall occur solely by reason of a cross-default provision in the Subordinate Loan Documents relating to a Subordinate Loan Default. (n)“Subordinate Loan Documents” means the Subordinate Note, the Subordinate Mortgage, and all other documents at any time evidencing, securing, guaranteeing, or otherwise delivered in connection with the Subordinate Indebtedness, as the same may be amended. (o)“Subordinate Note” means the promissory note or other evidence of the Subordinate Indebtedness referred to in the Subordinate Note and any replacement of the Subordinate Note. 2.Subordination of Subordinate Indebtedness. (a)The Subordinate Indebtedness is and will at all times continue to be subject and subordinate in right of payment to the prior payment in full of the Senior Indebtedness as provided in this Agreement. 144 Subordination Agreement Page 4 (b)Until the occurrence of a Senior Loan Default, Subordinate Lender will be entitled to retain for its own account all payments made on account of the principal of and interest on Subordinate Indebtedness in accordance with the requirements of Subordinate Loan Documents. However, immediately upon Subordinate Lender’s receipt of Notice or actual knowledge of a Senior Loan Default, Subordinate Lender will not accept any payments on account of any Subordinate Indebtedness and the provisions of Section 2(c) of this Agreement will apply. Subordinate Lender acknowledges that any Subordinate Loan Default constitutes a Senior Loan Default. Accordingly, upon the occurrence of any Subordinate Loan Default, Subordinate Lender will be deemed to have actual knowledge of a Senior Loan Default. (c)If (i) Subordinate Lender receives any payment, property, or asset of any kind or in any form on account of the Subordinate Indebtedness (including any proceeds from any Enforcement Action) after a Senior Loan Default of which Subordinate Lender has actual knowledge (or is deemed to have actual knowledge as provided in 2(b) above) or has been given Notice, or (ii) Subordinate Lender receives, voluntarily or involuntarily, by operation of law or otherwise, any payment, property, or asset in or in connection with any Bankruptcy Proceeding, such payment, property, or asset will be received and held in trust for Senior Lender. Subordinate Lender will promptly remit, in kind and properly endorsed as necessary, all such payments, properties, and assets to Senior Lender. Senior Lender will apply any payment, asset, or property so received from Subordinate Lender to the Senior Indebtedness in such order, amount (with respect to any asset or property other than immediately available funds), and manner as Senior Lender determines in its sole and absolute discretion. Subordinate Lender designates and appoints, irrevocably and coupled with an interest, Senior Lender (and all persons and entities designated by Senior Lender) as Subordinate Lender’s true and lawful attorney-in-fact with power to endorse the name of Subordinate Lender upon any check or other instrument and to take any action necessary to collect any payment, property, or asset referred to in, or otherwise effectuate the provisions of, this Section 2(c). (d)Without limiting the subordination of the Subordinate Indebtedness to the payment in full of the Senior Indebtedness as provided herein, in any Bankruptcy Proceeding, upon any payment or distribution (whether in cash, property, securities, or otherwise) to creditors (i) the Senior Indebtedness will first be paid in full in cash before Subordinate Lender will be entitled to receive any payment or other distribution on account of or in respect of any of the Subordinate Indebtedness, and (ii) until all of the Senior Indebtedness is paid in full in cash, any payment or distribution to which Subordinate Lender would be entitled but for this Agreement (whether in cash, property, or other assets) will be made to Senior Lender. (e)The subordination of all of the Subordinate Indebtedness as provided herein will continue if any payment under the Senior Loan Documents and/or the Subordinate Loan Documents (whether by or on behalf of Borrower, as proceeds of security or enforcement of any right of set-off or otherwise) is for any reason repaid or returned to Borrower or its insolvent estate, or avoided, set aside or required to be paid to 145 Subordination Agreement Page 5 Borrower, a trustee, receiver or other similar party under any bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or similar law. In such event, any or all of the Senior Indebtedness and/or Subordinate Indebtedness originally intended to be satisfied will be deemed to be reinstated and outstanding to the extent of any repayment, return, or other action, as if such payment on account of such indebtedness had not been made. 3.Subordination of Subordinate Loan Documents. (a)Each of the Subordinate Loan Documents is, and will at all times remain, subject and subordinate in all respects to the liens, terms, covenants, conditions, operations, and effects of each of the Senior Loan Documents as and to the extent provided in this Agreement and the Senior Loan Documents. (b)Subordinate Lender acknowledges and agrees that it has no rights or claims under any of the Subordinate Loan Documents in or to any of the proceeds of the Senior Loan or any portion of the Mortgaged Property and any purported right or claim thereto is hereby disclaimed and made expressly subject and subordinate in all respects to the rights and claims of Senior Lenderunder the Senior Loan Documents in or to such Mortgaged Property. Further, Subordinate Lender agrees that if Senior Lenderagrees to a short sale of the Mortgaged Property by Borrower to a third party not affiliated with Borrower or Senior Lender, then Subordinate Lender shall agree to release the Subordinate Mortgage even if the Subordinate Note is not paid in full. (c)If Subordinate Lender, by indemnification, subrogation or otherwise, acquires any lien, estate, right or other interest in any of the Mortgaged Property, then such additional lien, estate, right or other interest will be fully subject and subordinate to the receipt by Senior Lender of payment in full of the Senior Indebtedness, and to the Senior Loan Documents, to the same extent as the Subordinate Indebtedness and the Subordinate Loan Documents are subordinate pursuant to this Agreement. 4.Additional Representations and Covenants. (a)Without the prior written consent of Senior Lender in each instance, Subordinate Lender will not do any of the following: (i)Amend, modify, waive, extend, renew, or replace any provision of any of the Subordinate Loan Documents in any way which would have a material adverse effect on the Borrower or repayment of the Senior Loan. (ii)Pledge, assign, transfer, convey, or sell any interest in the Subordinate Indebtedness or any of the Subordinate Loan Documents unless the transferee expressly acknowledges this Agreement and agrees to be bound by its terms. (iii)Take any action which has the effect of increasing any of the Subordinate Indebtedness or materially alter the repayment terms of any of the 146 Subordination Agreement Page 6 Subordinate Indebtedness which would have a negative impact on the ability of the Borrower to repay the Senior Indebtedness. (b)Subordinate Lender will deliver to Senior Lender a copy of each Notice of any Subordinate Loan Default delivered by Subordinate Lender pursuant to the Subordinate Loan Documents or in connection with the Subordinate Indebtedness, simultaneously with Subordinate Lender’s delivery of such Notice to Borrower. Senior Lender will deliver to Subordinate Lender in the manner required in Section 5(b) a copy of each Notice of a Senior Loan Default delivered to Borrower by Senior Lender. Neither giving nor failing to give a Notice to Senior Lender or Subordinate Lender pursuant to this Section 4(b) will affect the validity of any Notice given by Senior Lender or Subordinate Lender to Borrower, as between Borrower and Senior Lender or Subordinate Lender as the Notice is provided to Borrower. (c)Without the prior written consent of Senior Lender in each instance, Subordinate Lender will not commence, or join with any other creditor in commencing, any Bankruptcy Proceeding. In the event of a Bankruptcy Proceeding, Subordinate Lender will not vote affirmatively in favor of any plan of reorganization or liquidation unless Senior Lender has also voted affirmatively in favor of such plan. In the event of any Bankruptcy Proceeding, Subordinate Lender will not contest the continued accrual of interest on the Senior Indebtedness, in accordance with and at the rates specified in the Senior Loan Documents, both for periods before and for periods after the commencement of such Bankruptcy Proceedings. (d)Whenever any of the Subordinate Loan Documents give Subordinate Lender approval or consent rights with respect to any matter related to the Mortgaged Property (including, without limitation, with respect to the renovation, repair, replacement or operation thereof), and a right of approval or consent with regard to the same or substantially the same matter is also granted to Senior Lender pursuant to the Senior Loan Documents or otherwise, Senior Lender’s approval or consent or failure to approve or consent, as the case may be, will be binding on Subordinate Lender. None of the other provisions of this Section 4 are intended to be in any way in limitation of the provisions of this Section 4(d). (e)All requirements pertaining to insurance under all of the Subordinate Loan Documents (including requirements relating to amounts and types of coverages, deductibles and special endorsements) will be deemed satisfied if Borrower complies with the insurance requirements under the Senior Loan Documents of Senior Lender. All original policies of insurance required pursuant to the Senior Loan Documents and all proceeds thereof will be held by Senior Lender. (f)Subordinate Lender will not collect payments for the purpose of escrowing for any cost or expense related to the Mortgaged Property. (g)Within ten (10) days after request by Senior Lender, Subordinate Lender will furnish Senior Lender with a statement, duly acknowledged and certified setting 147 Subordination Agreement Page 7 forth the then-current amount and terms of the Subordinate Indebtedness, confirming that there exists no default under the Subordinate Loan Documents (or describing any default that does exist), and certifying to such other information with respect to the Subordinate Indebtedness as Senior Lender may request. (h)Except as provided in Section 5(d), Senior Lender may amend, waive, postpone, extend, renew, replace, reduce or otherwise modify any provision of any of the Senior Loan Documents without the necessity of obtaining the consent of or providing Notice to Subordinate Lender, and without affecting any of the provisions of this Agreement. 5.Default Under Loan Documents. (a)Senior Lender will have the right, but not the obligation, to cure any Subordinate Loan Default, until such time, if ever, as Senior Lender delivers to Subordinate Lender Senior Lender’s Notice of written consent to an Enforcement Action described in an Enforcement Action Notice given by Subordinate Lender as a consequence of any Subordinate Loan Default. Subordinate Lender acknowledges that all amounts advanced or expended by Senior Lender to cure any Subordinate Loan Default will be added to and become a part of the Senior Indebtedness and will be secured by the lien of the respective Senior Mortgage. (b)Senior Lender will deliver to Subordinate Lender a copy of any Notice sent by Senior Lender to Borrower of a Senior Loan Default within five (5) Business Days of sending such Notice to Borrower. Failure of Senior Lender to send Notice to Subordinate Lender will not prevent the exercise of Senior Lender’s rights and remedies under the Senior Loan Documents. Subordinate Lender will have the right, but not the obligation, to cure any Senior Loan Default during such period of time, if any, as Borrower is permitted by the terms of the Senior Loan Documents to cure a Senior Loan Default. Subordinate Lender will not be subrogated to the rights of Senior Lenderunder the Senior Loan Documents by reason of Subordinate Lender having cured any Senior Loan Default. (c)Except as permitted by this subsection (c), any Enforcement Action on the part of Subordinate Lender will be subject to the prior written consent of Senior Lender. In the event of any Subordinate Loan Default, Subordinate Lender will not commence any Enforcement Action until after (i) Subordinate Lender has delivered to Senior Lender an Enforcement Action Notice with respect to such Enforcement Action, and (ii) Senior Lenderhas delivered to Subordinate Lender Senior Lender’s written consent to such Enforcement Action by Subordinate Lender. Senior Lender will advise SubordinateLender whether Senior Lenderconsents to the Enforcement Action by Subordinate Lender within ninety (90) days following Senior Lender’s receipt of the Enforcement Action Notice (failure of Senior Lender to provide written consent to the Enforcement Action within such 90-day period constitutes Senior Lender’s refusal of such consent). Subordinate Lender acknowledges that 148 Subordination Agreement Page 8 Senior Lender may grant or refuse consent to Subordinate Lender’s Enforcement Action in Senior Lender’s sole and absolute discretion. Subordinate Lender acknowledges that the provisions of this Section 5(c) are fair and reasonable under the circumstances, that Subordinate Lender received a substantial benefit from Senior Lender having granted its consent to Subordinate Loan, and that Senior Lender would not have granted such consent without the inclusion of these provisions in this Agreement. 6.Miscellaneous Provisions. (a)If there is any conflict or inconsistency between the terms of any of the Subordinate Loan Documents and the terms of this Agreement, then the terms of this Agreement will control. (b)This Agreement will be binding upon and will inure to the benefit of the respective legal successors and permitted assigns of the parties hereto. No other party will be entitled to any benefits hereunder, whether as a third-party beneficiary or otherwise. (c)This Agreement does not constitute an approval by Senior Lender of the terms of any of the Subordinate Loan Documents. (d)Each Notice, request, demand, consent, approval or other communication (collectively, “Notices,” and singly, a “Notice”) which is required or permitted to be given pursuant to this Agreement will be in writing and will be deemed to have been duly and sufficiently given if (i) personally delivered with proof of delivery (any Notice so delivered will be deemed to have been received at the time so delivered), or (ii) sent by a national overnight courier service (such as FedEx) designating earliest available delivery (any Notice so delivered will be deemed to have been received on the next Business Day following receipt by the courier), or (iii) sent by United States registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, at a post office regularly maintained by the United States Postal Service (any Notice so sent will be deemed to have been received on the date of delivery as confirmed by the return receipt), addressed to the respective parties as follows: (i)Notices intended for Senior Lender will be addressed to: Bridgewater Bank 4450 Excelsior Boulevard, Suite 100 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 Attn: Erik Schwegler 149 Subordination Agreement Page 9 With a copy to: Messerli & Kramer, P.A. 1400 Fifth Street Towers 100 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Attn: Michelle R. Jester, Esq. (ii)Notices intended for Subordinate Lender will be addressed to: Subordinate Lender: The City of Chanhassen _____________________________ _____________________________ Any party, by Notice given pursuant to this Section, may change the person or persons and/or address or addresses, or designate an additional person or persons or an additional address or addresses, for its Notices, but Notice of a change of address will only be effective ten (10) days after receipt. Neither party will refuse or reject delivery of any Notice given in accordance with this Section. (e)Nothing in this Agreement or in any of the Senior Loan Documents or any Subordinate Loan Documents will be deemed to constitute Senior Lender as a joint venturer or partner of Subordinate Lender. (f)Upon Notice from Senior Lender or Subordinate Lender to the other, all will execute and deliver such additional instruments and documents, and will take such actions, as are required by the notifying party in order to further evidence or implement the provisions and intent of this Agreement. (g)This Agreement will be governed by the laws of the State in which the Mortgaged Property is located. (h)If any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement, or any application of any such provisions, is invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, the validity, legality, enforceability, and application of the remaining provisions contained in this Agreement will not in any way be affected or impaired. (i)The term of this Agreement will commence on the date of this Agreement and will continue until the earliest to occur of the following events: (i) the payment of all of the Senior Indebtedness; provided that this Agreement will be reinstated in the event any payment on account of the Senior Indebtedness is avoided, set aside, rescinded or repaid by Senior Lender as described in Section 2(e) of this Agreement, or (ii) the payment of all of the Subordinate Indebtedness other than by reason of payments which Subordinate Lender is obligated to remit to Senior Lender pursuant to this Agreement, and the termination of all Subordinate Lender’s obligations to advance proceeds of any Subordinate Loan; provided that this 150 Subordination Agreement Page 10 Agreement will be reinstated in the event any payment on account of any of the Subordinate Indebtedness is avoided, set aside, rescinded or repaid by Subordinate Lender as described in Section 2(e) of this Agreement. (j)No failure or delay on the part of any party to this Agreement in exercising any right, power, or remedy under this Agreement will operate as a waiver of such right, power, or remedy, nor will any single or partial exercise of any such right, power or remedy preclude any other or further exercise of such right, power, or remedy or the exercise of any other right, power or remedy under this Agreement. (k)Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that if any party fails to comply with its obligations under this Agreement, the other parties will have all rights available at law and in equity, including the right to obtain specific performance of the obligations of such defaulting party and injunctive relief. (l)This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of any subsequent holder of the Senior Indebtedness. (m)This Agreement may be amended, changed, modified, altered or terminated only by a written instrument or written instruments signed by the parties to this Agreement. (n)This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument. [REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK; SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] 151 Subordination Agreement Page S-1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. SENIOR LENDER: BRIDGEWATER BANK, a Minnesota banking corporation By: ________________________________ Erik Schwegler Its:Senior Vice President STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of _____________________, 2021, by Erik Schwegler, the Senior Vice President of Bridgewater Bank, a Minnesota banking corporation on behalf of the banking corporation. __________________________________________ Notary Public 152 Subordination Agreement Page S-2 SUBORDINATE LENDER: THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation By:________________________________ Printed Name: _______________________ Its: ________________________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ____________) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of ________________, 2021, by ________________________, the _______________ of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation. __________________________________________ Notary Public 153 Subordination Agreement Page S-3 CONSENT OF BORROWER Borrower acknowledges receipt of a copy of this Subordination Agreement, dated January ____, 2022, by and among Bridgewater Bank and the City of Chanhassen and consents to the terms and conditions of the parties set forth in this Agreement. CHANHASSEN GATEWAY PLACE, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company By: Printed Name: _______________________ Its: ________________________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF __________) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of _________, 2021, by __________________, the __________________ of Chanhassen Gateway Place, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company. __________________________________________ Notary Public 154 Subordination Agreement Page A-1 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parcel 1: Lot 1, Block 2, Gateway North, Carver County, Minnesota. Parcel 2: Non-exclusive perpetual appurtenant easement for driveway purposes for automobiles and other vehicles as contained in Driveway Easement Agreement dated June 14, 2006, filed October 6, 2006, as Document No. 451290. 155 City Council Item November 22, 2021 Item Ordinance XXX: Amend Chanhassen City Code Chapter 9: Fire Prevention and Protection File No.Item No: E.14 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council adopts an ordinance amending Chanhassen City Code Chapter 9: Fire Prevention Protection to include new appendices of the Minnesota State Fire Code." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY The State of Minnesota regularly updates its Fire Code. In the most recent update, the optional appendices increased in number and were reorganized. This has resulted in several new appendices being automatically adopted and several other appendices that the City would like to have adopted or had previously adopted not being included in the City’s current Fire Code. BACKGROUND On December 8, 2003, the City passed ordinance number 357, which adopted the 2003 Minnesota State Fire Code by reference. Since the provisions contained in the appendices of the State Fire Code are not mandatory unless specifically referenced in the adopting ordinance, none of the provisions contained in the appendices were adopted. On August 12, 2019, the City Council passed ordinance number 644, which amended Chapter 9 to adopt 156 the 2015 Minnesota Fire Code and its associated appendixes, excepting Appendices A and D. On March 31, 2020, the State Fire Code was updated to include appendices not listed in ordinance number 644. DISCUSSION On August 12, 2019, the City Council approved language that automatically adopted the most current edition of the Minnesota State Fire Code including Appendices B, C, and E through L as the Fire Code for the City of Chanhassen. The goal of this language was to keep the City’s Fire Code current without the need to pass ordinances adopting the most recent version of the State’s Fire Code every time it is revised. During the last round of updates in March 31, 2020, the State Fire Code’s optional appendices increased in number and were reorganized. Since the City is required to explicitly identify the appendices that it wishes to adopt, this has resulted in appendices M, N, O and P not being adopted into the City Code. These appendices contain important fire safety provisions that should be incorporated into the City Code. For this reason staff recommends amending the City’s Fire Code to include Appendices B, C, and E through P. A full discussion in included in the attached staff report. BUDGET Staff recommends that the City Council amend Section 9-3 to include the new appendices. RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS Issue Paper-Fire Department Updates Draft Ordinance Redlined Final Ordinance 157 CITY OT CIIAI'IHASSTI'I Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomonow MEMORANDUM City Council FROM:Don Nutter, Assistant Fire Chief,iFire Marshal MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner DATE: November 22,2021 SUBJ: Chapter 9: Fire Prevention and Protection Issue: The State of Minnesota regularly updates its Fire Code. In the most recent update, the optional appendices increased in number and were reorganized. This has resulted in several new appendices being automatically adopted and several other appendices that the City would like to have adopted or had previously adopted not being included in the City's current Fire Code. Summarw: On August 12,2019, the City Council approved language that automatically adopted the most current edition ofthe Minnesota State Fire Code including Appendices B, C, and E through L as the Fire Code for the City ofChanhassen. The goal of this language was to keep the City's Fire Code current without the need to pass ordinances adopting the most recent version ofthe State's Fire Code every time it is revised. During the last round of updates in March 31,2020, the State Fire Code's optional appendices increased in number and were reorganized. Since the City is required to explicitly identi$r the appendices that it wishes to adopt, this has resulted in appendices M, N, O and P not being adopted into the City Code. These appendices contain important fire safety provisions that should be incorporated into the City Code. For this reason staffrecommends amending the City's Fire Code to include Appendices B, C, and E through P. Relevant Code: Section 9-3: Adopts most recent version of Minnesota State Fire Code and specified appendices as the Fire Code for the City of Chanhassen. Backsround: On December 8, 2003, the City passed ordinance number 357, which adopted the 2003 Minnesota State Fire Code by reference. Since the provisions contained in the appendices of the State Fire Code are not mandatory unless specifically referenced in the adopting ordinance, none ofthe provisions contained in the appendices were adopted. PH 952.227.1100. www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us. FX 952.227.1110 r/OO MARKET BOULEVARD .PO BOX I4T.CHANHASSEN .MINNESOTA 553]7 TO: 158 On August 12,2019, the City Council passed ordinance number 644, which amended Chapter 9 to adopt the 2015 Minnesota Fire Code and its associated appendixes, excepting Appendices A and D. On March 31,2020, the State Fire Code was updated to include appendices not listed in ordinance number 644. Analysis *The City adopted its own appeals P rocedure in Section 9-4. '*The City has incorporated these standards into Chapter 18. 1 A: Board of Appeals'A: Board of Appeals* B: Fire Flow Requirements for BuildingsB: Fire Flow Requirements for Buildings c: Fire Hydrant Locations and DistributionsC: Fire Hydrant Locations and Distributions D: EmergPncT Apparatu s Access"D: Emergency Apparatus Access*' E: Hazard CatPgoriesE: Hazard categories F: Hazard RankingF: Hazard Ranking G: cryogenic FluidsG: cryogenic Fluids H: Hazardous Materials Management PlanH: Hazardous Materials Management Plan l: Fire Protection Systemsl: Fire Protection systems J: Building Sign lnformationJ: Building sign lnformation K: Construction requirements of Existing Ambulatory Care Facilities K: Fires or Barbecues on Balconies or Patios U Requirements for Fire Fi8hterAir Replenishment systemsL Emergency Responder Radio Coverage M: High Rise Buildings - Retroactive Automatic Sprinkler Requirement o: Fires or Barbecues on Balconies or Patios P: Emergency Responder Radio coverage Previouslv adopted, still in force Not ad for adnot Previously adopted, no I r in force,for ion New section, adopted by reference New section,for on Chapter 9: Fire Prevention and Protection November 22, 2021 Page 2 2020Ap Dendices e code ADDendices N: lndoorTrade shows and Exhibitions Kev: 159 Chapter 9: Fire Prevention and Protection November 22, 2021 Page 3 This table notes what appendices were previously adopted and how the March 31,2020 changes impacted the City's adopted Fire Code. It is staffls beliefthat all appendices previously adopted by the City and newly included in the State Fire Code should be included in the City's Fire Code. The important elements ofAppendices A and D are already incorporated into the City Code and these sections should not be adopted. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council amend Section 9-3 to include the new appendices. The proposed amendment would read as follows: Sec. 9-3. - Technical Standards - Adopted. The Minnesota State Fire Code and accompanying optional Appendices B, C, and E through L P, established pursuant to M.S. 299F.01 I , is hereby adopted as the Fire Code for the City ofchanhassen. The Code is hereby incorporated in this section as if fully set out herein. The ordinance codified in this section shall perpetually include the most current edition of the Minnesota State Fire Code including Appendices B, C, and E through t P. glplan\city code\2021\2021-10 fire updale\issue paper-fd updates.docx 3 160 1 203173v1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. XXX AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 9, FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION, OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 9-3 of the Chanhassen City Code is amended to read as follows: Sec. 9-3. – Technical Standards – Adopted. The Minnesota State Fire Code and accompanying optional Appendices B, C, and E through LP, established pursuant to M.S. 299F.011, is hereby adopted as the fire code for the City of Chanhassen. The Code is hereby incorporated in this section as if fully set out herein. The ordinance codified in this section shall perpetually include the most current edition of the Minnesota State Fire Code including Appendices B, C, and E through LP. Section 2. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of November, 2021, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota. Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor (Ordinance XXX published in the Chanhassen Villager on December 1, 2021) 161 1 203173v1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. XXX AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 9, FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION, OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 9-3 of the Chanhassen City Code is amended to read as follows: Sec. 9-3. – Technical Standards – Adopted. The Minnesota State Fire Code and accompanying optional appendices B, C, and E through P, established pursuant to M.S. 299F.011, is hereby adopted as the fire code for the City of Chanhassen. The Code is hereby incorporated in this section as if fully set out herein. The ordinance codified in this section shall perpetually include the most current edition of the Minnesota State Fire Code including Appendices B, C, and E through P. Section 2. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of November, 2021, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota. Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor (Ordinance XXX published in the Chanhassen Villager on December 1, 2021) 162 City Council Item November 22, 2021 Item Monthly Fire Department Update with Response Data from October File No.Item No: G.1 Agenda Section FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE Prepared By Don Johnson, Fire Chief Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION N/A Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 2021 11 22 Council Update 163 Monthly Graphs and Tables 164 TO: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager FROM: Don Johnson, Fire Chief DATE: November 22, 2021 SUBJ: Monthly Fire Department Update Fire Department Staffing Department staffing is at 35 paid on-call firefighters with one firefighter on personal leave due to employment, one firefighter on extended military leave, and one firefighter on extended medical leave. A five year firefighter resigned due to job transfer out of state since our last meeting. There is a current posting for experienced firefighters within a 6 mile radius to recruit additional part time, paid on call firefighters. This is the first time this type of posting has been used to recruit duty crew firefighters. This type of hire would be much quicker to on board and begin working shifts. Tentative hiring date would be January 1. Fire Department Response The fire department responded to (86) calls for service in October. Call Breakdown for the month: 1 Chief Only 18 Day Only 36 Duty Crew 31 General Alarms Significant calls included the following:  (54) Rescue/EMS calls with (3) motor vehicle accidents  (1) Call out for a person in the water at Marsh Lake  (1) Fire Response o RR Donnelly, West 78th street 165 Laurie Hokkanen Fire Department Update Page 2 Other Activities  Continued to assist the Chanhassen HS with sectional and regional football games by providing EMT response  Assistant Chief White and I provided certification training in fireground incident command in Watertown Nov 18-November 20. The class had officers from multiple fire departments; St. Paul, Richfield, Long Lake, Victoria, and Watertown Fire Training  Scenario based training on response to Apartment Building incidents with pre-plan scenarios for Tealwood Living.  EMS Training  Hazardous Materials Training Fire Marshal Council Update  Participated with a Tabletop exercise at WWTP with plant operators and started planning phase for a functional exercise with utilities and the fire department for spring of 2022. 166 94 88 76 64 71 88 102 85 85 79 84 868075 65 79 77 74 78 82 65 84 75 83 59 66 83 78 81 91 120 105 117 86 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Chanhassen Fire Department Calls By Month Comparison 2019 2020 2021 167 753 921 1,002 917 1,064 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Projected Calls for Service by Year Rescue & Emergency Medical Service 61% Alarm Calls 11% Good Intent Call 11% Hazardous Condition 7% Service Call 6% Fire 4% 2021 Calls for Service by % of Call Type Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Alarm Calls Good Intent Call Hazardous Condition Service Call Fire 168 169 Basic Incident Date Time: Incident Type (Fd1.21): Elite mnfirereport Incident Type Report (Summary) Incident Type Total Incidents Total Incidents % of Incidents Total Property Loss Total Content Loss Total Loss Incident Type Category: 1 - Fire 111 - Building fire 1 1.2% Total: 1 Total: 1.2%Total: 0 Total: 0 Total: 0 Incident Type Category: 3 - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incident 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 50 58.1% 322 - Motor vehicle accident with injuries 3 3.5% 342 - Search for person in water 1 1.2% Total: 54 Total: 62.8%Total: 0 Total: 0 Total: 0 Incident Type Category: 4 - Hazardous Condition (No Fire) 412 - Gas leak (natural gas or LPG)5 5.8% 421 - Chemical hazard (no spill or leak)1 1.2% 424 - Carbon monoxide incident 1 1.2% 442 - Overheated motor 1 1.2% Total: 8 Total: 9.3%Total: 0 Total: 0 Total: 0 Incident Type Category: 5 - Service Call 551 - Assist police or other governmental agency 1 1.2% 554 - Assist invalid 2 2.3% Total: 3 Total: 3.5%Total: 0 Total: 0 Total: 0 Incident Type Category: 6 - Good Intent Call 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 3 3.5% 6111 - EMS Dispatched and cancelled en route 3 3.5% 622 - No incident found on arrival at dispatch address 5 5.8% 631 - Authorized controlled burning 1 1.2% Total: 12 Total: 14.0%Total: 0 Total: 0 Total: 0 Incident Type Category: 7 - False Alarm & False Call 731 - Sprinkler activation due to malfunction 1 1.2% 735 - Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 1 1.2% 741 - Sprinkler activation, no fire - unintentional 1 1.2% 743 - Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 2 2.3% 745 - Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 2 2.3% 746 - Carbon monoxide detector activation, no CO 1 1.2% Total: 8 Total: 9.3%Total: 0 Total: 0 Total: 0 Total: 86 Total: 100.0%Total: 0 Total: 0 Total: 0 Report Filters is between '10/1/2021' and '10/31/2021' Report Criteria Is Not Blank Printed On: 11/01/2021 08:44:36 AM1 of 1 170 ³CH ±"F) "F) Rice Lake Lake Riley Lake Susan Rice Marsh Lake Ann Lake St. Joe Harrison Lake Lake Lucy Lotus Lake Clasen Lake Minnewashta Lake Christmas Lake Rice Lake ST18 ST17 ST15 ST14 ST61 SA5 SA7 SA5 SA101 SA41 )212Audubo nRdChanhassen RdArboretum Blvd Hazeltine BlvdPioneer TrlGalpinBlvdLyman Blvd H w y212Hwy 212MarketBlvdGalpinBlvdHwy 7Powers BlvdGreatPlainsBlvdArb o r e t u m B l v d Flying C l o u d D r C o R d 1 0 1 ST101 GH117 Document Path: K:\Departments\Fire\FireIncidents_RMS\2021-10(October)\2021-10(October).aprxDate Created: 11/4/2021 Created By: City of Chanhassen - Fire Department µ0 4,000 Feet 0 0.5 Mile City of Chanhassen Fire Calls for Service - October 2021 Calls For Service - October (86)³CH ±City Hall "F)Fire Station Railroad Rivers Lakes Parks Parcel Boundaries Fire Box Alarm Zones North Box South Box West Box 171 City Council Item November 22, 2021 Item Law Enforcement Update for October File No.Item No: G.2 Agenda Section FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE Prepared By Lance Pearce, Lieutenant, CCSO Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION None Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS Chanhassen City Council Meeting 11-22-21 memo 172 2019-2021 Call Trends monthly report October 2021 Breakdown October 2021 Nibrs Activity Codes 173 Page 1 Memo TO:Mayor Ryan and Chanhassen City Council Members FROM: Lieutenant Lance Pearce DATE: November 15, 2021 RE: Law Enforcement Update Attached are the agenda items for the City of Chanhassen council meeting for November 22, 2021, for your review and consideration. 1. Carver County Sheriff’s Office City of Chanhassen October 2021 Calls for Service Summary; Group A, Group B, Non-Criminal, Traffic and Administrative. 2. Carver County Sheriff’s Office City of Chanhassen October 2021 Arrest Summary. 3. Carver County Sheriff’s Office City of Chanhassen October 2021 Citation Summary. 4. October 2021 monthly breakdown 5. 2019-2021 Call trends 6. Staffing update: One vacancy in the contract (SRO) and one patrol assignment 7. Training update: All Patrol staff have completed the Body-worn Camera training and are currently in use Lieutenant Chanhassen Office 174 2019-2021 Call Trends Carver County Sheriff’s Office City of Chanhassen 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Domestics by Month 2019 Domestics by Month 2020 Domestics by Month 2021 Domestics by Month 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Domestic Assault by Month 2019 Domestic Assault by Month 2020 Domestic Assault by Month 2021 Domestic Assault by Month 175 0 5 10 15 20 25 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Mental Health by Month 2019 Mental Health by Month 2020 Mental Health by Month 2021 Mental Health by Month 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Fraud/ Theft by Month 2019 Fraud/ Theft by Month 2020 Fraud/ Theft by Month 2021 Fraud/ Theft by Month 176 177 178 179 180 October 2021 Carver County Sheriff’s Office City of Chanhassen Call for Service Total Patrol Activity=746 52 35 416 Felony Misdemeanor Non Criminal Traffic October 2021 Types of Calls CFS=746 268 8 27 5 12 October 2021 Group A Felony Assault Felony Theft Drug Felony-Other 181 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 October 2021 Non Criminal 22 165 34 39 Driving Complaint Traffic Stops Crashes Citations Traffic 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 City Council Item November 22, 2021 Item Minnetonka Middle School West Access Improvement Update File No.Item No: I.1 Agenda Section GENERAL BUSINESS Prepared By Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION N/A - Discussion only Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority Communications SUMMARY Staff will give a brief update on the project status. BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 197 Earmark Funding Letter from MnDOT 198 State Aid for Local Transportation 395 John Ireland Blvd., MS 500 St. Paul, MN 55155 Phone: 651-366-3803 1 of 2 2021_Chan_TH41RAB_LRIPSelLet.docx September 3, 2021 Charles Howley Chanhassen City Engineer 7700 Market Blvd PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: 2021 Local Road Improvement Program (LRIP) General Fund Legislative Earmark Dear Mr. Howley, Congratulations! On June 26, 2021, the governor signed House File 5 into law as Minnesota Laws 2021, 1st Special Session, Chapter 5. Article 1, Section 6, appropriated $30,930,000.00 “from the general fund to the commissioner of transportation for trunk highway and local road projects, which may include but are not limited to feasibility and corridor studies, project development, predesign, preliminary and final design, engineering, environmental analysis and mitigation, right-of-way acquisition, construction, and associated infrastructure improvements.” Note that these funds are set to expire on June 30, 2025. Further, MnDOT sent a letter, dated June 19, 2021, to the Senate and House Transportation Committee Chairs, and Democratic and Republican leadership that outlines the intended use of these funds. The letter identifies 10 projects. One of these projects is the design and construction of a roundabout on Trunk Highway (TH) 41 at the intersection with the entrance and exit of Minnetonka Middle School West in Chanhassen, which was identified to receive up to $1,500,000.00. It is my understanding that the city will lead this project. This project is further described in SF 1159, Article 1, Section 34. Following are a few important notes: • Your agency will be required to execute one or more LRIP grant agreements prior to construction. Note that these funds will be distributed on a reimbursable basis – that is, the city will need to incur the expenses and then submit state aid pay requests. If desired, we can execute separate grant agreements for design and construction. This would allow the city to access the funds as they are expended. o Funds can be used for design. After the city has selected a consultant to develop plans, specifications, and engineer’s estimate, Dan Erickson, the District State Aid Engineer (DSAE) will issue a force account agreement that specifies costs. He will then send me the force account agreement and request that I issue the funding letter. o Funds can be used for construction. The DSAE will need to review, approve, and sign plans prior to the city advertising the construction contract. After the DSAE has approved the plan, specifications, and engineer’s estimate, he will send the engineer’s estimate to me and request that I issue the funding letter. • My office will provide additional instructions for assembling and executing the LRIP grant agreement(s) as part of the delivery of the funding letter. • The final LRIP amount for construction will be based on the low bid documents. • The LRIP grant agreement should be fully executed before construction begins. Again, congratulations on the TH 41/middle school project being selected for legislative funding. Please feel free to contact me during project development as you have grant-related questions. 199 2 of 2 2021_Chan_TH41RAB_LRIPSelLet.docx Sincerely, Marc Briese State Aid Programs Manager copy: Dan Erickson, Metro District State Aid Engineer Julie Dresel, Metro District State Aid Programs Engineer Ryan Wilson, Metro District South Area Manager 200 City Council Item November 22, 2021 Item Approve a Request for Subdivision of Three Parcels into Three Lots and One Outlot and Site Plan Review for Development of an Approximately 82,000 Square-Foot, One-Story, Office-Warehouse Building Located at 2100 Stoughton Avenue (River Valley Industrial Center) File No.Planning Case No. 2021-19 Item No: I.2 Agenda Section GENERAL BUSINESS Prepared By Bob Generous, Senior Planner Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves Planning Case No. 2021-19 for a preliminary plat and site plan for River Valley Industrial Center, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated August 3, 2021, and Phillip D. Johnson, Architect, dated August 3, 2021, subject to the conditions of the staff report as modified, and Adopts the Planning Commission's Findings of Fact and Recommendation." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY The applicant is requesting the subdivision of three parcels into three lots and one outlot and site plan review for development of an approximate 82,000 square-foot, one-story, office-warehouse building (River Valley Industrial Center). The proposed subdivision is in both Chanhassen and Chaska. The proposed building is in Chanhassen. A portion of the parking lot is located within Chaska. The City of Chaska is reviewing the project concurrently and also must grant subdivision approval and site plan approval for the project. Since the surrounding roads are in the city of Chaska, the City of Chanhassen is requiring that the developer comply with right-of-way dedication, public improvements in the right-of- 201 way, and site access issues with Chaska and Carver County's requirements. BACKGROUND The Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 7, 2021 to review the proposed development. The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the development subject to the conditions in the Planning Commission staff report. The applicant requested that this item be put on hold so that they could evaluate the financial aspects further. They have requested that this item be reviewed by the City Council at the November 22, 2021 meeting. They will be submitting their development proposal to the City of Chaska in January, 2022. DISCUSSION The agreement calls for Surface Water Management fees be taken for Lot 2 as part of the subdivision approval, which will contain the new building, and that stormwater fees only be taken for Lot 1 if it is redeveloped or further subdivided in the future. Staff prepared a high level review of the potential fees for the development with the future extension of sewer and water to the site. This review was based on a 2014 study undertaken as part of the County Road 61 Corridor Plan (www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/1022/Southwest-Reconnection-Project). However, these numbers are current estimates and actual costs would be determined at the time of the improvement project. The City of Chaska would be collecting area fees on that portion of the plat within Chaska. BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council approve Planning Case No. 2021-19 for a preliminary plat and site plan for River Valley Industrial Center, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc, dated August 3, 2021, and Phillip D. Johnson, Architect, dated August 3, 2021, and adopt the Findings of Fact and Recommendation, subject to the conditions of the staff report with modification to the preliminary plat Water Resources Condition 1 as follows: 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate SWMP Fee for the rate in effect at the time of recording the final plat. 2021 rates would require a fee of $477,736.00. 1. The applicant shall pay appropriate SWMP Fee at the rate in effect at the time of recording the final plat for Lot 2, Block 1. Rates for 2021 would require a fee of $177,130. Appropriate SWMP fees based on the rate in effect at the time of redevelopment would be required for Lot 1 if the site is redeveloped increasing the intensity or site coverage of the site. Appropriate SWMP fees shall be paid with the further subdivision of the property creating additional developable lot(s). ATTACHMENTS Planning Commission Staff Report dated September 7, 2021 Planning Commission Minutes Excerpt dated September 7, 2021 202 Findings of Fact and Recommendation Development Fee Estimates 203 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tuesday,September 7,2021 Subject Consider a Request for Subdivision of Two Parcels into Three Lots and One Outlot and Site Plan Review for Development of an Approximately 82,000-Square Foot,One-Story Office- Warehouse Building at 2100 Stoughton Avenue River Valley Industrial Center) Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No:B.2. Prepared By Bob Generous,Senior Planner File No:Planning Case No.2020-19 PROPOSED MOTION: The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case 2021-19 for a preliminary plat and site plan for River Valley Industrial Center,plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services,Inc,dated August 3,2021 and Phillip D.Johnson,Architect,dated August 3,2021,subject to the conditions of staff report,and Adopts the Findings of Fact and Recommendation. SUMMARY OF REQUEST The applicant is requesting subdivision approval to create a building lot for a second building on the site and site plan approval for an 81,660-square foot,one-story office-warehouse building. APPLICANT Capstone Investors,LLC,Joel Buttenhoff,102 Jonathan Boulevard North,200,Chaska,MN 55318 SITE INFORMATION PRESENT ZONING:Industrial Office Park District IOP) LAND USE:Office Industrial ACREAGE:24.12 acres DENSITY:0.21 F.A.R. APPLICATION REGULATIONS Chapter 18,Subdivisions Chapter 20,Article II,Division 6,Site Plan Review Chapter 20,Article XXII,IOP”Industrial Office Park District 204 PLANNING COMMISSIONSTAFFREPORTTuesday,September 7,2021SubjectConsideraRequest for Subdivision of Two Parcels into Three Lots and One Outlot andSitePlanReviewforDevelopmentofanApproximately82,000-Square Foot,One-Story Office-Warehouse Building at 2100 Stoughton Avenue River Valley Industrial Center)Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No:B.2.Prepared By Bob Generous,Senior Planner File No:Planning Case No.2020-19PROPOSEDMOTION:The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case 2021-19 for a preliminary platandsiteplanforRiverValleyIndustrialCenter,plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services,Inc,datedAugust3,2021 and Phillip D.Johnson,Architect,datedAugust3,2021,subject to the conditions of staff report,andAdoptstheFindingsofFactandRecommendation.SUMMARY OFREQUESTTheapplicantisrequestingsubdivision approval to create a building lot for a second building on the site and siteplanapprovalforan81,660-square foot,one-story office-warehouse building.APPLICANTCapstoneInvestors,LLC,Joel Buttenhoff,102 Jonathan Boulevard North,200,Chaska,MN55318SITEINFORMATIONPRESENTZONING:Industrial Office Park District IOP)LAND USE:OfficeIndustrialACREAGE:24.12 acresDENSITY:0.21 F.A.R.APPLICATIONREGULATIONSChapter18,Subdivisions Chapter 20,Article II,Division 6,Site Plan Review Chapter 20,Article XXII,IOP”Industrial Office Park District Chapter 20,Article XXIII,Division 7,Design Standards for Commercial,Industrial and Office-Institutional Developments BACKGROUND River Valley Business Center,an 180,000-square foot,four-unit,office-industrial-warehouse building,is the successor of the M.A.Gedney Pickle processing plant.The most easterly 39,000-square foot unit contains a storage operation for decommissioned,armored vehicles,which have had their fluids drained.There are two warehouse storage spaces of 48,370 square feet and 42,602 square feet in the middle portion of the building that are occupied by office, warehouse or manufacturing uses subject to limitations on the sewer capacity with the City of Chaska and Chanhassen City Code.The westerly 50,160 square feet of the building is vacant and had been approved for a food processing operation,Hemp Acres,which did not proceed. The developer would like to build a second building on the site.To do so,they must subdivide the property.Since the public streets adjacent to the development are under the jurisdiction of the City of Chaska and Carver County,right-of- way dedication and site accesses must comply with their requirements. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of Planning Case 2021-19,for a preliminary plat and site plan for River Valley Industrial Center,plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services,Inc,dated August 3,2021 and Phillip D.Johnson,Architect,dated August 3,2021,subject to the conditions of the staff report, and adopt the Findings of Fact and Recommendation. ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report Findings of Fact and Recommendation Development Review Application Plans Project Narrative Building Elevations Building Elevations Materials Carver County Requirements Chaska Boulevard Requirements Traffic Study Affidavit of Mailing 205 CITY OF CHANHASSEN PC DATE: September 7, 2021 CC DATE: September 27, 2021 REVIEW DEADLINE: October 5, 2021 CASE #: 2021-19 BY: RG, EH, DN, JR, JS, MU SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Request for subdivision of two parcels into three lots and one outlot and site plan review for development of an approximate 82,000 sq. ft., one-story office- warehouse building, River Valley Industrial Center. The proposed subdivision is in both Chanhassen and Chaska. The proposed building is in Chanhassen. A portion of the parking lot is located within Chaska. The City of Chaska is reviewing the project concurrently and also must grant subdivision approval and site plan approval for the project. LOCATION: 2100 Stoughton Avenue APPLICANT: Capstone Investors, LLC. Joel Buttenhoff 102 Jonathan Boulevard North #200 Chaska, MN 55318 joel@conerstone-mn.com 952) 368-9009 PROPOSED MOTION: The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case #2021-19, for a preliminary plat and site plan for River Valley Industrial Center, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc, dated August 3, 2021; and Phillip D. Johnson, Architect, dated August 3, 2021, subject to the conditions of staff report, And, adopts the Findings of Fact and Recommendation.” 206 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 2 PRESENT ZONING: Industrial Office Park (IOP) 2040 LAND USE PLAN: Office Industrial ACREAGE: 24.12 Acres DENSITY: 0.24 F.A.R. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City’s discretion in approving or denying a Preliminary Plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City’s discretion in approving or denying a Site Plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the City must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicant is requesting subdivision approval to create a building lot for a second building on the site and site plan approval for an 81,660 square foot, one-story office-warehouse building. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 18, Subdivisions Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6, Site Plan Review Chapter 20, Article XXII, “IOP” Industrial Office Park District Chapter 20, Article XXIII, Division 7, Design Standards for Commercial, Industrial and Office- Institutional Developments BACKGROUND River Valley Business Center, an 180,000 square foot, four-unit, office-industrial-warehouse building, is the successor of the Gedney Pickle processing plant. The most easterly 39,000- square foot unit contains a storage operation for decommissioned, armored vehicles, which have had their fluids drained. There are two warehouse storage spaces of 48,370 square feet and 42,602 square feet in the middle portion of the building that are occupied by office, warehouse or manufacturing uses subject to limitations on the sewer capacity with the City of Chaska and Chanhassen City Code. The westerly 50,160 square feet of the building is vacant and had been approved for a food processing operation, Hemp Acres, which did not proceed. 207 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 3 October 10, 2010, City Council approved a 39,000 square-foot, one-story warehouse expansion on the east end of the building (Planning Case #2010-11). October 18, 1982, City Council approved Industrial Revenue Bond resolution for M.A. Gedney Planning File #82-64). November 1979, City Council approved a sign variance to permit two signs on the industrial site. May 1979, City Council approved a 41,500 square-foot warehouse expansion, 6,000 square-foot sauerkraut manufacturing and 1,200 square-foot refrigeration storage (Planning Case P-125 / SPR #71-1). May 1972, Chaska-Chanhassen-Metropolitan Sewer Board entered into an agreement to permit M.A. Gedney to continue to use Chaska’s sanitary sewer system. June 1968, City of Chaska and Village of Chanhassen entered into an agreement to annex to Chanhassen and de-annex from Chaska land being purchased by M.A. Gedney for the plant operations. April 1, 1963, City of Chaska and M.A. Gedney entered into a sewer connection agreement. 1958, M.A. Gedney’s pickle manufacturing operations were consolidated at the plant on Stoughton Avenue. North of the site is vacant land in the City of Chaska and County Road 61 as well as additional vacant land within Chanhassen. To the east is an electrical substation for Minnesota Valley Electric and a cemetery. South across Stoughton Avenue is the Riverview Terrace mobile home park. To the west across Audubon Road are commercial businesses. The western portion of the property contains medal vats from the previous pickle factory on the site. A roofed, open sided dock area has been demolished on the western end of the existing building. In the future, if urban services are available for the entire area, the vacant land on the north side of the building will develop, creating a visual barrier for the north side of the building. The City undertook a feasibility study as part of the County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 61 Corridor Land Use Study in 2015 to determine the cost effectiveness of the extension of utilities to the property, and at that time, determine whether the Cities of Chanhassen or Chaska should provide sewer service to the property. The study findings indicated that extending City utilities to the study area is feasible. The CSAH 61 Corridor Land Use and Utility Study was finalized and approved by City Council on October 28, 2014. In anticipation of the redevelopment of this area, staff has also had discussions with the City of Chaska about extending Engler Boulevard as a connection to the northeast. SITE CONSTRAINTS Bluff Creek Corridor 208 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 4 This parcel is not encumbered by the Bluff Creek Overlay District. The City of Chanhassen established the Bluff Creek Overlay District by ordinance in 1998 to protect the Bluff Creek Corridor, wetlands, bluffs and significant stands of mature trees through the use of careful site design and other low-impact practices. Section 20-1255 of the Chanhassen City Code requires a conditional use permit for all development within the Bluff Creek Corridor. Wetland Protection There is/is not a wetland located in the development site. The proposed development should/ should not impact this wetland. Bluff Protection There are/are not bluffs on the property. Shoreland Management The property is not located within a shoreland protection district. Floodplain Overlay This property is/is not within a floodplain. SUBDIVISION ACCESS Access to the property is provided from Audubon Road and Stoughton Avenue, which connect to the arterial roads of CSAH 61 (Flying Cloud Drive) and CSAH 15 (Audubon Road). Audubon Road and Stoughton Avenue directly abutting the property are under the City of Chaska’s 209 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 5 jurisdiction and Flying Cloud Drive is Carver County’s. The City of Chanhassen does not have any right-of-way (ROW) directly abutting the property; however, the approximately 1,300 foot portion of Stoughton Avenue which provides access from Flying Cloud Drive to the property is a part of Chanhassen’s roadway network, illustrated in the image below. A traffic memo prepared by Paul Villaluz, PE, PTOE, RSP1 and Christopher Topacio with Westwood Professional Services, Inc. dated June 30, 2021 was provided by the applicant which addresses the River Valley Industrial Center’s trip generation, trip distribution, trip assignment, total intersection volumes and left turn storage bay analysis on Audubon Road. Also included in the traffic memo is an internal truck movement exhibit which illustrates adequate turning movements within the site for their design vehicle, a WB-67 (semi-truck). Based on the proposed preliminary site layout and the truck movement exhibit, trucks cross lot lines within the subdivision and also will share the existing access located off Stoughton Avenue with the existing building. This will require private cross access agreements between the abutting properties. As the City does not manage ROW directly abutting the site, the applicant will be required to address comments and requirements set forth by the City of Chaska and/or Carver County, which may include ingress/egress configurations, installation of ROW improvements such as sidewalks or traffic control devices, the dedication of ROW, etc. 210 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 6 EASEMENTS The preliminary plat provided by the applicant does not illustrate any public drainage and utility easements (DUE) as required by Sec. 18-76(b) of City Ordinance. The applicant will be required to provide at least a 10-foot wide DUE along all street right-of-way lines and five feet along side and rear lot lines that are located within the City of Chanhassen with the submittal of the final plat. Lots within the City of Chaska will be required to meet Chaska’s requirements. Existing easements were illustrated on the preliminary plat which included electric transmission line easements due to the overhead transmission lines that bisect the proposed subdivision. The applicant must adhere to all comments and recommendations from the utility, Minnesota Valley Electric, regarding improvements within their easements. GRADING & DRAINAGE The site is relatively flat. Existing drainage patterns fall into three subsheds; from the north side of the property sheet flow is directed to the northeast to an existing ditch abutting Chaska Boulevard (EX 1), the southwest portion of the property drains to an existing City of Chaska catch basin at the southwest corner of the site (EX 2), and the central and eastern portions drains to an existing private catch basin at the southeastern corner of the site (EX 3), as seen below. A majority of the grading within the subdivision is proposed on Lot 2 to accommodate the construction of the proposed multi-tenant industrial facility, River Valley Industrial Center, along with the required stormwater management BMPs. The applicant is proposing to construct 211 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 7 an infiltration basin at the southwest corner of the site to capture stormwater runoff from the roof and parking west and south of the building which is then routed to privately owned catch basins on the south east of the site. A second infiltration basin is located at the northeast corner of the site. The site has existing tanks with an elevated walkway, small abandoned buildings, and a water tower that were once used by a previous tenant of the existing building, the M.A. Gedney food processing plant. The applicant is proposing to remove all of the existing structures located on proposed Lot 2 in order to mass grade the site and construct all improvements. A demolition permit will be required for the removal of all existing structures. The applicant’s preliminary Stormwater Management Plan prepared by Westwood, dated August 3, 2021, indicates that the existing private catch basin to the southeast is owned by the City of Chanhassen, however this is not a City-owned and maintained storm sewer system. The applicant will be required to confirm both the ownership of this private system and determine if the downstream stormwater conveyance and BMPs are adequately sized to handle the additional volume generated from the proposed development. Ultimately, permission to tie-into the private system must be provided prior to the recording of the final plat. Lastly, based on the provided grading plan and narrative it is unclear whether or not the site grading will balance the volume of earthwork necessary to achieve the proposed finished elevations. Should earthwork quantities not balance on site and materials need to be imported or exported, the applicant will need to supply the City with a detailed haul route for review and approval by staff. In addition, if material is proposed to be exported to another location in Chanhassen, it should be noted that the properties would be required to obtain an earthwork permit from the City. Also, if during the course of grading and/or construction any drain tile is discovered, the developer shall notify the City Engineer and will be required to relocate or abandon the drain tile as directed. EROSION CONTROL The proposed development will exceed one (1) acre of disturbance and will, therefore, be subject to the General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination/State Disposal System (NPDES Construction Permit). The applicant has provided a preliminary erosion control plan that generally appears feasible, however it is deficient as it does not include all the requirements listed under Sec. 19-145.(a)(2) such as the location of stockpiled materials. Also, no SWPPP was provided which will be required in accordance with the NPDES Construction Permit for review and approval by the City. All erosion control shall be installed and inspected prior to initiation of site grading activities. To guarantee compliance with the plans, and related remedial work, a cash escrow or letter of credit, satisfactory to the city, shall be furnished to the city before a Notice to Proceed is issued for the development. The escrow amount shall be 110% of the estimated costs of construction 212 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 8 for grading, erosion control and stormwater improvements associated with the development. The applicant will be required to supply an engineer’s estimate for the cost of these improvements. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Article VII, Chapter 19 of City Code describes the required stormwater management development standards. Section 19-141 states that “these development standards shall be reflected in plans prepared by developers and/or project proposers in the design and layout of site plans, subdivisions and water management features.” These standards include abstraction of runoff and water quality treatment resulting in the removal of 90% total suspended solids (TSS) and 60% total phosphorous (TP). The applicant will need to work with the Lower Minnesota River Watershed District (LMRWD), the City of Chaska, and the City of Chanhassen in order to meet all requirements. General 1. Applicant needs to confirm with the LMRWD map if the project location is in a High Value Resource Area (HVRA). Notes a) and b) below seem to be in conflict regarding the HVRA requirements. a. In the Stormwater Report on page 1, it is stated 1.1” of runoff is required to be retained on site. This is specific to the project being in a HVRA. b. In the Stormwater Report on page 1, it is stated that there should be no net increase in TP and TSS. This is specific to the project NOT being in a HVRA. 2. Provide evidence of an approved LMRWD permit prior to construction. Water Quality 1. Water quality was modeled with P-8 and was shown to be met with reductions of over 90% for TP and TSS. 2. It is recommended to treat water from Proposed Drainage Area 3 (P3) to meet MPCA water quality standards. Confirm no untreated water will enter the wildlife management area adjacent to the project site. Rate Control 1. Rate Control requirements are shown to be met for the 1-, 2-, 10-, and 100-year runoff rates per the HydroCAD modeling results provided. 2. It is recommended to calculate TCs for the proposed drainage areas instead of direct entry in Hydrocad. 3. Edit the Primary Outlet for Pond 2 in Hydrocad to match the slope called out on the drainage plan sheet. Volume Control 1. Infiltration is proposed to meet volume control requirements. Soil borings in the area show sands and silty sands. 213 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 9 Infiltration Basin Design 1. Provide an operation and maintenance plan that identifies the maintenance schedule and responsible party. 2. Applicant should complete a double ring infiltrometer test to confirm soils are conducive to infiltration. If the test yields infiltration rates above 8.3 in/hr, soils should be mixed to reduce infiltration capacity. 3. Applicant should note proposed pretreatment for each infiltration basin. 4. MnDOT recommends at least 200’ separation between infiltration practices and private wells. The new domestic water well on the southwest side of the building is approximately 60’ from the proposed infiltration basin in the southwest corner of the site. 5. MnDOT recommends at least 100’ separation between infiltration practices and septic systems. The septic drain field in the northeast corner of the property is approximately 80’ away from the proposed infiltration swale in the northeast corner of the site. 6. Confirm existing building is not draining to the proposed northeast infiltration swale. Civil Plans 1. It is recommended that that the minimum 12” RCP pipe grade be 0.37%, MnDOT’s minimum grade to meet 3 FPS self-cleaning velocity. Elevations in STMH-201 and STMH-200 will allow for this slope and still connect to existing storm infrastructure. 2. Applicant should ensure there is at least 1.75’ of cover between top of CL V 12” RCP and top of flexible bituminous pavement. Heavy-vehicle traffic will place a substantial load on these pipes. 3. Applicant should confirm with the owner of the private storm sewer (STMH-EX-2) that tying into their existing storm sewer is acceptable for a proposed 10-year storm event. 4. Provide storm sewer sizing calculations for a 10-year storm event. 5. The EOF elevation of the SW basin called out in the grading plan is the same as the dock elevation. It is recommended the EOF be lowered slightly to mitigate flooding risk. 6. Applicant must re-route proposed sanitary sewer around the proposed infiltration basin. 0.5’ between the bottom of the infiltration media and the top of sanitary sewer is not acceptable. 7. Include plan to restore infiltration pond and swale after construction is completed. 8. The project SWPPP and NPDES permit must be submitted to the city prior to the start of any earthwork. WETLANDS AND BUFFERS There are no wetlands located on the property, and as such, no wetland delineation is required. Wetland buffers are not applicable on this parcel. SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT FEES Section 4-30 of City Code sets out the fees associated with surface water management. A water quality and water quantity fee are collected with a subdivision. These fees are based on land use 214 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 10 type and are intended to reflect the fact that the more intense the development type, the greater the degradation of surface water. This fee will be applied to the new lots of record being created. The fees will be assessed at the rate in effect at that time; 2021 rates are $22,450.00 per acre for Industrial development. 21.28 acres of this development are within Chanhassen. As such, SWMP Fee due at the time of final plat is $477,736.00. UTILITIES Currently, Chanhassen municipal sanitary sewer and water mains do not extend to the southern portion of the City, as such the site does not have adequate public sanitary and water to serve the development’s needs. In 2014, a Highway 61 corridor study was conducted in response to several near and long-term infrastructure projects at the time (e.g. Highway 101 Realignment, CR 61 reconstruction, flood mitigation projects, etc.) which prompted the City to investigate the feasibility of extending City utilities to the southern portion of the City. The study, known as County Road 61 Corridor Plan”, conducted by SRF in association with Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc., determined that utility extensions were feasible within the study area. The image below, taken from Figure 3.1 of the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, depicts the City’s existing and planned sanitary sewer in this area. The proposed development falls within the most southwestern corner of sanitary subdistrict LB-1 (the Lower Bluff Creek District). The 2040 Comprehensive Plan also indicates that water will be extended to the project area, however these utility extensions have yet to be funded. The 2014 study estimated costs and fee revenue associated with extending City utilities to the study area, along with estimated utility assessments per acre, which are shown in Tables 1 and 2. 215 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 11 With a lack of adequate City utilities in the area, the applicant has proposed the construction of a private well and a septic system to serve the utility needs of the River Valley Industrial Center. The applicant is aware that in the future City utilities will be extended and has provided a dry sanitary sewer service which extends to the southern property line to facilitate this future connection. In order to limit the length that public sanitary sewer is required to be extended, the applicant must adjust the termination point of the dry sanitary service line (terminating at proposed MH-5) to the southeast corner of Lot 2. The utility plan provided for the site shows the adjacent building’s water tower supplying fire suppression needs to the newly proposed building. No calculations were provided to show that this is a feasible connection to supply adequate fire flows and the applicant will be required to provide such an analysis. Staff has discussed with the City of Chaska the alignment of this fire line, which at one point extends into Stoughton Avenue. Chaska will not allow for private utility lines within their public right-of-way, thus the fire line must be relocated to meet this requirement. Lastly, as private internal utility lines cross property lines, private operation and maintenance agreements for any internal private utilities crossing property lines must be recorded concurrently with the final plat. The properties associated with this subdivision will be specially assessed for the extension of the public water and sanitary sewer when they connect. 216 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 12 LANDSCAPING AND TREE PRESERVATION The applicant for the Holasek Business Park development did not submit tree canopy coverage and preservation calculations. Staff estimated as follows: Total upland area (excluding wetlands) 21.28 acres Baseline canopy coverage 0% or 0 acre Minimum canopy coverage required 10% or 2 acres or 92,695 sf Total number of trees required 85 trees The applicant has proposed a total of 78 trees to be planted on site, but will need to revise the diversity and quantities of each species as well as bring the total number to be planted up to 85 trees. The planting schedule shall reflect that no one species will comprise more than 8 trees and no genus will have more than 17 trees. PARKS & RECREATION The quality and number of recreational facilities in a community directly contributes to its quality of life. For this reason, the City of Chanhassen places a strong emphasis on parks and open space. As the City of Chanhassen has developed and increased in population, more pressure and attention has been given to providing recreational opportunities for our residents. Increased leisure time, health awareness, greater mobility, and high disposable incomes have all contributed to the increased demand for recreational activities. The challenge of the next century will be to provide facilities for a growing and diverse population. Parks can be defined as public areas that provide active or passive-oriented recreational facilities. A significant characteristic of parkland is its accessibility to its users. Open space is any parcel that is not used for buildings or other structures and is left in a natural state. Parks and open space perform diverse functions such as: meeting physical and psychological needs, enhancing and protecting the resource base, enhancing real estate values, and providing a positive impact on economic development. Parks The goal of neighborhood parks is to provide informal recreational opportunities close to where people live. Chanhassen operates under the standard that all residents should be within walking distance, or a half mile, of a neighborhood park. The proposed subdivision is located in both the Cities of Chanhassen and Chaska. This unique industrial subdivision doesn’t serve your typical resident where neighborhood parks play a vital role. Trails The City’s goal is to maintain a comprehensive and easily navigable trail and sidewalk system that connects neighborhoods to park and recreation facilities, schools, community destinations 217 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 13 and other communities. This unique subdivision currently lacks a sidewalk/pedestrian corridor and any future road right away or pedestrian access conditions of approval will be deferred to the City of Chaska. The proposed development will have access to regional trails along Chaska Boulevard and the Southwest Regional Trail. Park and Trail Conditions of Approval The current rate for Commercial/Industrial is $12,500 per acre for Park Dedication fees. 12,500 X 7.89 acres = $98,625 Total Park Dedication Fees. The developer shall pay current Commercial/Industrial Park Dedication fees in effect at the time of final plat for Lot 2. PERMITS At this time staff has determined that the developer must contact the following agencies for permits: a) Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for the NPDES stormwater permit b) Minnesota Department of Health for the well c) Carver County d) Lower Minnesota River Watershed District e) City of Chanhassen for building permits COMPLIANCE TABLE Area (sq. ft.) Width ft.) Depth ft.) Hard Cover sq. ft. Notes Code 43,560 150 200 70 / 30,492 Lot 1 583,268 61 / 358,605 13.39 ac. Chanhassen Lot 2 343,688 670 350 63/ 217,800 7.89 ac. Chanhassen Lot 3 49,222 78 686 1.13 Chaska Outlot A 74,487 1.71 ac. Chaska ROW TBD As required by Chaska and Carver County Total 1,050,667 24.12 acres Setbacks: front yards - 30 feet, rear yards - ten feet, side yards - ten fee, site coverage 70% SITE PLAN REVIEW The applicant is requesting site plan approval for an 81,660 square foot, one story office- warehouse building. Development of the building is contingent on approval and recording of the final plat for River Valley Industrial Center. While the building is located within the municipal boundary of the City of Chanhassen, the public streets around the development are located 218 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 14 within the City of Chaska and subject to compliance with their requirements. Site plan approval is contingent on final plat approval and recording of the plat. ARCHITECTURAL COMPLIANCE 219 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 15 Size Portion Placement The building entrances are recessed into the building and covered by metal canopies. Material and detail High quality materials - accent materials, such as metal or EFIS, may occupy up to 15 percent of the building’s façade. The metal panels would be considered accent material. Acceptable materials incorporate textured surfaces, exposed aggregate and other patterning. Color The primary building material facing the streets is a red with black accent exposed aggregate in concrete, light gray horizontal and vertical accent bands, charcoal gray metal accent panels and light gray window framing with smoked windows. Height and Roof Design The building height is 26 feet. City Code requires that each building shall have more than one pitched element. To meet this requirement, the developer has incorporated canopies over building entrances with additional architectural detailing above the entrance. Mechanical equipment shall be screened. No wooded fences on the roof are permitted. The applicant shall demonstrate that the roof mounted HVAC meets this standard. Facade Transparency Fifty percent (50%) of the first floor elevation that is viewed by the public shall include transparent windows and or doors. All other areas shall include landscaping material and architectural detailing and articulation. For buildings with a use or function that does not readily allow windows, e.g., cooler or freezer areas, mechanical rooms, security areas, storage areas or warehouse or manufacturing space in commercial or industrial buildings, the fenestration standards may be reduced. However, the architecture detailing must be provided by the use of upper level windows, the use of spandrel glass or architectural detailing which provides arches, patterning, recesses and shadowing that provide aesthetic interest. 220 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 16 The south elevation of the building requires additional architectural detailing. This elevation should mirror the northern building elevation in materials and accent, rather than simple concrete panels. The truck bay shall be screened from the public right-of-way by the existing building on Lot 1, distance, and additional landscaping along Stoughton Avenue. Site Furnishing The applicant shall install sidewalks from the development to Audubon Road to connect to the sidewalk system in Chaska. Additionally, bike parking facilities and an employee patio area shall be provided. Loading Areas, Refuse Area, Etc. Screening of service yards, refuse and waste removal, other unsightly areas and truck parking/loading areas is required. The applicant shall increase site landscaping along Stoughton Avenue to provide additional screening. The use of berming is encouraged. Location, access and screening detail of trash enclosures must be provided. Lot Frontage and Parking Location The property fronts on three roads, Audubon Road, Chaska Boulevard (County Road 61), and Stoughton Avenue. All of these roadways are located within the city of Chaska. The primary access to the building is off of Audubon Road. Truck access shall be via Stoughton Avenue. Parking is distributed on three sides of the building. Parking setbacks along public rights-of-way may be reduced to a minimum of ten feet if the applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the city that 100 percent screening is provided at least five feet above the adjacent parking lot. ACCESS The development shows access to both Audubon Road and Stoughton Avenue with frontage on Chaska Road. Access permits from the City of Chaska and Carver County are required of the development. The developer shall comply with City of Chaska and Carver County requirements. Staff believes that Chaska is requiring that the access driveway on Audubon Road must align with Crystal Lane, which would require the realignment of the driveway and redesign of the stormwater pond. Chanhassen requires that a pedestrian access be provided from the proposed building to Audubon Road. 221 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 17 EASEMENTS A cross access easement shall be recorded for the parcels in the development. GRADING A majority of the grading within the development is proposed on Lot 2 to accommodate the construction of the proposed multi-tenant industrial facility, River Valley Industrial Center, along with the required stormwater management BMPs. The applicant is proposing to construct an infiltration basin at the southwest corner of the site to capture stormwater runoff from the roof and parking west and south of the building which is then routed to privately owned catch basins on the south east of the site. A second infiltration basin is located at the northeast corner of the site. The site has existing tanks with an elevated walkway, small abandoned buildings, and a water tower that were once used by a previous tenant of the existing building, the Gedney food processing plant. The applicant is proposing to remove all of the existing structures located on proposed Lot 2 in order to mass grade the site and construct all improvements. A demolition permit will be required for the removal of all existing structures. 222 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 18 The applicant’s preliminary Stormwater Management Plan prepared by Westwood, dated August 3, 2021, indicates that the existing private catch basin to the southeast is owned by the City of Chanhassen, however this is not a City-owned and maintained storm sewer system. The applicant will be required to confirm both the ownership of this private system and determine if the downstream stormwater conveyance and BMPs are adequately sized to handle the additional volume generated from the proposed development. Ultimately, permission to tie-into the private system must be provided prior to the recording of the final plat. Lastly, based on the provided grading plan and narrative it is unclear whether or not the site grading will balance the volume of earthwork necessary to achieve the proposed finished elevations. Should earthwork quantities not balance on site and materials need to be imported or exported, the applicant will need to supply the City with a detailed haul route for review and approval by staff. In addition, if material is proposed to be exported to another location in Chanhassen, it should be noted that the properties would be required to obtain an earthwork permit from the City. Also, if during the course of grading and/or construction any drain tile is discovered, the developer shall notify the City Engineer and will be required to relocate or abandon the drain tile as directed. DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL The proposed development will exceed one (1) acre of disturbance and will, therefore, be subject to the General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination/State Disposal System (NPDES Construction Permit). The applicant has provided a preliminary erosion control plan that generally appears feasible, however it is deficient as it does not include all the requirements listed under Sec. 19-145.(a)(2) such as the location of stockpiled materials. Also, no SWPPP was provided which will be required in accordance with the NPDES Construction Permit for review and approval by the City. All erosion control shall be installed and inspected prior to initiation of site grading activities. To guarantee compliance with the plans, and related remedial work, a cash escrow or letter of credit, satisfactory to the city, shall be furnished to the city before a Notice to Proceed is issued for the development. The escrow amount shall be 110% of the estimated costs of construction for grading, erosion control and stormwater improvements associated with the development. The applicant will be required to supply an engineer’s estimate for the cost of these improvements. The proposed development will exceed one (1) acre of disturbance and will, therefore, be subject to the General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination/State Disposal System (NPDES Construction Permit). All erosion control shall be installed and inspected prior to initiation of site grading activities. 223 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 19 LANDSCAPING The development is required to install a buffer yard along the north, south and west property lines. The minimum requirements are shown in the table below: Required plantings Proposed plantings Bufferyard C – North prop. line, Lyman Blvd., 660’ 13 overstory trees 33 understory trees 33 shrubs 13 overstory trees 5 understory trees 37 shrubs Bufferyard C – South prop. line, Stoughton Ave., 520’ 15 overstory trees (not recommended under power lines) 31 (46 total) understory trees 46 shrubs 4 overstory trees 7 understory trees 33 shrubs Bufferyard C –west prop. line, Audubon Rd., 760’ 15 overstory trees 38 understory trees 38 shrubs 19 overstory trees 3 understory trees 16 shrubs The applicant does not meet bufferyard requirements along any of the property lines. Staff recommends that the applicant increase landscaping quantities to meet minimum requirements. The applicant will need to provide adequate screening of the loading docks along the south property line and parking stalls along the north property line. There are overhead power lines along Stoughton Avenue, therefore the overstory tree quantities should be added to the understory total and species such as spruce should be changed to junipers or cedars. Additionally, buffer plantings need to be located north of the parking area along Chaska Boulevard. All parking areas are required to have screening. Minimum requirements for landscaping for the parking lot include 6,400 sq. ft. of landscaped area around the parking lot, five landscape islands or peninsulas, and 25 trees for the parking lot. The applicant’s proposed as compared to the requirements for landscape area and parking lot trees is shown in the following table. Required Proposed Vehicular use landscape area 6,400 sq. ft. >6,400 sq. ft. Trees/parking lot 25 trees 18 trees Landscape islands or peninsulas/parking lot 5 islands/peninsulas 5 islands/peninsulas The applicant does not meet minimum requirements for trees. The applicant shall increase the parking lot tree planting quantity to 25 trees. 224 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 20 LIGHTING/SIGNAGE The applicant has submitted a lighting plan and photometrics for review. Light fixtures include area lighting on 25-foot tall poles as well as wall mounted units. Lighting shall be revised at the southeast corner of the building to reduce lighting at the property line to 0.5. The applicant shows a monument sign at the corner of Audubon Road and Chaska Boulevard. This sign must comply with Chaska Code and receive a permit from them. If monument signage is proposed in Chanhassen, it would be limited to 64 square feet of sign display area and eight feet in height. Wall signage must comply with City of Chanhassen signage requirements. All signage requires separate sign permits. The City anticipates individual tenant signage as part of the development. MISCELLANEOUS Building will require a full fire suppression system, fire alarm panel to monitor the sprinkler system, and possibly a full functioning fire alarm system based on type of occupancy (planned type of storage in building). How the water will be supplied for the fire suppression system and fire hydrants must be analyzed and submitted for City review and approval. The system will need to meet NFPA13 standards to supply both buildings and fire hydrants on site with the proper flow as needed. The fire line could not run under the city street (per City of Chaska) so they need to find a different path. Calculations for the new building for ESFR heads with a fire pump system and all 4 hydrants proposed to be added. The calculations will show the demand for all of this and how to provide adequate supply. A septic design must be submitted and approved before a building permit can be issued. Septic design must be prepared by a septic design professional licensed by the State of Minnesota. A building permit must be obtained before beginning any construction. Building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. Building plans must provide sufficient information to verify that proposed building meets all requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code, additional comments or requirements may be required after plan review. The building is required to have automatic fire extinguishing systems. Structure proximity to property lines (and other buildings) will have an impact on the Code requirements for the proposed buildings, including but not limited to; allowable size, protected openings and fire-resistive construction. These requirements will be addressed when complete building and site plans are submitted. Building plans must include a Code analysis that contains the following information: Key plan, Occupancy group, Type of construction, Allowable height and area, Fire sprinklers, Separated or non-separated, Fire resistive elements (Ext walls, Bearing walls - exterior or interior, Shaft, Incidental use), Occupant load, Exits required (Common path, Travel distance), Minimum plumbing fixture count. Retaining walls (if present) more than four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. 225 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 21 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Article VII, Chapter 19 of City Code describes the required stormwater management development standards. Section 19-141 states that “these development standards shall be reflected in plans prepared by developers and/or project proposers in the design and layout of site plans, subdivisions and water management features.” These standards include abstraction of runoff and water quality treatment resulting in the removal of 90% total suspended solids (TSS) and 60% total phosphorous (TP). UTILITIES Sanitary sewer service shall be provided via a private septic system. In the future, City sewer may be extended to the property. At that time, the development would be required to connect to the City sewer. Section 19-41 requires that buildings connect to City sewer. All buildings and structures constructed within the city after March 11, 1985, on premises adjacent to a sewer of the City sanitary sewer system, or in a block through or to which the sanitary sewer system extends, or is within 150 feet of said sanitary sewer system, shall be connected to the city sanitary sewer system for the disposal of sewage or industrial waste. Water is proposed via a new domestic well for the building. Water supply for the fire suppression system is from the existing water tank on Lot 1. Size and direction of proposed water lines, fire hydrants, distance of hydrant to proposed building and the capacity of the water supply for fire suppression purposes shall be analyzed, reviewed and approved by the City. COMPLIANCE TABLE Code Project Building Height 4 stories 1 story 50 feet 26 feet Building Setback N - 10' E - 10' N - 10' E - 114' W - 30' S - 30' W - 101' S – 59’ Parking Stalls 101 stalls 111 stalls Standards: Office: 5/1.000 square feet (12,249/1,000 x 5 = 61.25) Warehouse 1/1,000 for 1st 10,000 then1/2,000 thereafter (69,411 square feet 10,000/1,000 + 59,411/2,000 = 39.71) Parking Setback N - 0' E - 0' N - 0' E - 0' W - 30' S - 25' W - 27' S – 26’ Hard Surface Coverage 70% 63% Lot Area 43,560 sq. ft. 343,688 sq. ft. (7.89 ac.) 226 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 22 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of Planning Case #2021- 19, for a preliminary plat and site plan for River Valley Industrial Center, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc, dated August 3, 2021; and Phillip D. Johnson, Architect, dated August 3, 2021, and adopt the Findings of Fact and Recommendation, subject to the following conditions: PRELIMINARY PLAT Engineering 1. A private cross access agreements between Lots 1 and 2 must be recorded concurrently with the final plat. 2. Private operation and maintenance agreements for any internal private utilities crossing property lines must be recorded concurrently with the final plat. 3. The applicant shall address all requirements set forth by the City of Chaska and Carver County prior to recording of the final plat and/or issuance of a Notice to Proceed for construction activities. 4. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies, as necessary, i.e. Lower Minnesota River Watershed District, Carver County, the City of Chaska, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Army Corps of Engineers, etc. and comply with their conditions of approval. 5. The applicant shall provide drainage and utility easements in accordance with Sec. 18- 76(b) with the submittal of the final plat. 6. The applicant shall confirm the ownership of all private storm systems proposed to be connected to. Permission to tie into the private system must be provided prior to the recording of the final plat. 7. The Stormwater Management Report and modeling shall be updated to include analysis of downstream private conveyance and stormwater BMPs that are being proposed to be connected to in order to ensure they will adequately function with the increase in stormwater volumes. 8. An updated erosion and sediment control plan in accordance with Sec. 19-145 and SWPPP in accordance with the NPDES Construction Permit shall be provided for review and approval prior to commencement of any construction activities. 9. All erosion control shall be installed and inspected prior to initiation of site grading activities. 10. Fire flow calculations justifying the existing water tank can supply the newly proposed development’s fire suppression needs shall be provided for review prior to recording of the final plat. 11. The private fire line proposed under Stoughton Avenue shall be relocated wholly outside the right-of-way. 12. The properties associated with this subdivision will be specially assessed for the extension of the public water and sanitary sewer when they connect. 227 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 23 Parks 1. The developer shall pay Commercial/Industrial Park Dedication fees in effect at the time of final plat for Lot 2. Environmental Resources 1. Diversity within the Planting Schedule shall meet minimum standards for 85 trees to meet subdivision planting requirements. Water Resources 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate SWMP Fee for the rate in effect at the time of recording the final plat. 2021 rates would require a fee of $477,736.00. 2. The applicant shall confirm with the LMRWD map if the project location is in a High Value Resource Area (HVRA). 3. The applicant shall provide the approved LMRWD permit when it is obtained. 4. The applicant shall work with the City to execute an Operations and Maintenance Plan that identifies the maintenance schedule and responsible parties for the infiltration basin. 5. The applicant shall complete a double ring infiltrometer test to confirm soils are conducive to infiltration. 6. The applicant shall confirm with the City of Chaska that tying into the private storm sewer, but within Chaska’s right-of-way, is permissible. 7. The project SWPPP and NPDES permit must be submitted to the City prior to the start of any earthwork. SITE PLAN Building 1. A septic design must be submitted and approved before a building permit can be issued. 2. Septic design must be prepared by a septic design professional licensed by the State of Minnesota. 3. A building permit must be obtained before beginning any construction. 4. Building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 5. Building plans must provide sufficient information to verify that proposed building meets all requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code, additional comments or requirements may be required after plan review. 6. The building is required to have automatic fire extinguishing systems. 7. Structure proximity to property lines (and other buildings) will have an impact on the Code requirements for the proposed buildings, including but not limited to; allowable size, protected openings and fire-resistive construction. These requirements will be addressed when complete building and site plans are submitted. 8. Building plans must include a code analysis that contains the following information: Key plan, Occupancy group, Type of construction, Allowable height and area, Fire sprinklers, Separated or non-separated, Fire resistive elements (Ext walls, Bearing walls - exterior or 228 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 24 interior, Shaft, Incidental use), Occupant load, Exits required (Common path, Travel distance), Minimum plumbing fixture count. 9. Retaining walls (if present) more than four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. Engineering 1. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide necessary financial security to guarantee compliance with the terms of site plan approval. This shall include, but is not limited to, 110% of the estimated costs of construction for grading, erosion control and stormwater improvements associated with the development. 2. The applicant shall address all requirements set forth by the City of Chaska and/or Carver County prior to construction activities. 3. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies, as necessary, i.e. Lower Minnesota River Watershed District, Carver County, the City of Chaska, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Minnesota Department of Health, Army Corps of Engineers, etc. and comply with their conditions of approval. 4. The applicant shall address all requirements set forth by Minnesota Valley Electric regarding any improvements within the utility’s easements. 5. A demolition permit will be required for the removal of all existing structures. 6. The applicant shall supply the City with a detailed haul route for review and approval by staff for materials imported to or exported from the site prior to construction activities. 7. The applicant shall report to the City Engineer the location of any drain tiles found during construction and shall relocate or abandon the drain tile as directed by the City Engineer. 8. An updated erosion and sediment control plan in accordance with Sec. 19-145 and SWPPP in accordance with the NPDES Construction Permit shall be provided for review and approval prior to commencement of any construction activities. 9. All erosion control shall be installed and inspected prior to initiation of site grading activities. 10. The applicant must adjust the termination point of the dry sanitary service line terminating at proposed MH-5) to the southeast corner of Lot 2. 11. Fire flow calculations justifying the existing water tank can supply the newly proposed development’s fire suppression needs shall be provided for review. Fire 1. Building will require a full fire suppression system, fire alarm panel to monitor the sprinkler system, and possibly a full functioning fire alarm system based on type of occupancy (planned type of storage in building). Fire flow calculations for the new building for ESFR heads with a fire pump system and all four hydrants proposed to be added. The calculations will show the demand for all of this and how to provide adequate supply. 2. How the water will be supplied for the fire suppression system and fire hydrants must be analyzed and submitted for City review and approval. 229 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 25 3. Access roads and parking lot will need to be of proper type and size to meet Fire Apparatus Access Roads standards. Environmental Resources 1. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to increase quantities to meet minimum ordinance requirements for bufferyard plantings. 2. The applicant shall increase the number of trees around the parking lots areas to 25 trees. 3. The applicant shall plant only understory species and shrubs along Stoughton Avenue. Planning 1. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary security to guarantee site restoration and landscaping. 2. Site plan approval is contingent on final plat approval and recording of the plat. 3. The south elevation of the building requires additional architectural detailing. 4. Pedestrian access shall be provided from the proposed building to Audubon Road. 5. Bike parking facilities and an employee patio area shall be provided. 6. Location, access and screening detail of trash enclosures must be provided. Water Resources 1. The applicant shall provide the approved LMRWD permit when it is obtained. 2. The applicant shall treat water from Proposed Drainage Area 3 (P3) to meet MPCA water quality standards. 3. The applicant shall confirm that no untreated water will enter the wildlife management area adjacent to the project site. 4. The applicant shall calculate TCs for the proposed drainage areas instead of direct entry into Hydrocad. 5. The applicant shall edit the Primary Outlet for Pond 2 in hydrocad to match the slope called out on the drainage plan sheet. 6. The applicant shall work with the City to execute an Operations and Maintenance Plan that identifies the maintenance schedule and responsible parties for the infiltration basin. 7. The applicant shall complete a double ring infiltrometer test to confirm soils are conducive to infiltration. 8. The applicant shall note the proposed pretreatment for each infiltration basin. 9. The applicant shall adjust the plans to meet MnDOT’s recommended 200-feet of separation between the infiltration basin and the domestic water well. 10. The applicant shall adjust the plans to meet MnDOT’s recommended 100-feet of separation between the infiltration basin and the septic system. 11. The applicant shall confirm that the existing building is not draining to the proposed northeast infiltration swale. 12. The applicant shall adjust the 12” RCP pipe grade to be 0.37%, MNDOT’s minimum grade to meet 3 FPS self-cleaning velocity. 13. The applicant shall ensure there is at least 1.75’ of cover between top of CL V 12” RCP and top of flexible bituminous pavement. 230 2100 Stoughton Avenue Request for Subdivision & Site Plan Review September 7, 2021 Page 26 14. The applicant shall confirm with the owner of the private storm sewer (STMH-EX-2) that tying into their existing storm sewer is acceptable for a proposed 10-year storm. 15. The applicant shall confirm with the City of Chaska that tying into the private storm sewer, but within Chaska’s right-of-way, is permissible. 16. The applicant shall provide storm sewer sizing calculations for a 10-year storm event. 17. The applicant shall lower the EOF elevation to mitigate flooding risk. 18. The applicant shall re-route proposed sanitary sewer around the proposed infiltration basin. 0.5’ between the bottom of the infiltration media and the top of sanitary sewer is not acceptable. 19. The applicant shall include a plan to restore the infiltration pond and swale after construction is completed. 20. The project SWPPP and NPDES permit must be submitted to the City prior to the start of any earthwork. 21. All erosion control shall be installed and inspected prior to initiation of site grading activities. ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation 2. Development Review Application 3. Plans 4. Architectural Specifications 5. Carver County Letter 6. Chaska Boulevard Requirements 7. Traffic Study 8. Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List g:\plan\2021 planning cases\21-19 2100 stoughton ave (river valley industrial ctr)\staff report pc river valley ind ctr_final.docx 231 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of Capstone Investors, LLC for Subdivision approval and Site Plan Review. On September 7, 2021, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly schedule meeting to consider the application of Capstone Investors, LLC for Subdivision approval and Site Plan Review for the property located at 2100 Stoughton Avenue. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed site plan preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Industrial Office Park District, IOP. 2. The property is guided by the Land Use Plan for Office Industrial uses. 3. The legal description of the property is: See Exhibit A 4. Subdivision Findings a. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and meets all of the requirements of the “IOP” Industrial Office Park District; b. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable City, County and regional plans including but not limited to the City's Comprehensive Plan; c. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and stormwater drainage are suitable for the proposed development; d. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by the subdivision ordinance; e. The proposed subdivision will not cause significant environmental damage subject to compliance with the conditions of approval; f. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record, but rather will expand and provide all necessary easements; 232 2 g. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: 1) Lack of adequate stormwater drainage. 2) Lack of adequate roads. 3) Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. 4) Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. 5. Site Plan Findings Section 20-110: 1) Is consistent with the elements and objectives of the City's development guides, including the Comprehensive Plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; 2) Is consistent with Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6; 3) Preserves the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing or developing areas; 4) Creates a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; 5) Creates a functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: a. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; b. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; c. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and d. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. 6) Protects adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. 233 3 6. The planning report #2021-19 dated September 7, 2021, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the preliminary plat and site plan review subject to the conditions of the staff report. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 7th day of September, 2021. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY:___________________________________ Its Chairman 234 4 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel 1: That part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 115, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the West line of said Section 3 distant 1795.7 feet due South of the Northwest corner thereof, said point being in the Southeasterly right of way line of the Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad; thence running Northeasterly along said right of way line 997.8 feet; thence running due South parallel with the West line of said Section 3, 272.18 feet to a point in the centerline of the industry spur track, said point being the actual point of beginning of the tract of land to be described, said point also being in a curve having a radius of 694.69 feet, the radius point of said curve being South 46 degrees 57 minutes East, 694.69 feet from said actual point of beginning; thence running Northeasterly along the centerline of said industry spur track and along the arc of said curve to the right a distance of 89.72 feet to the end of said curve; thence running North 50 degrees 27 minutes East tangent to said curve and along the centerline of said industry spur track 1270.56 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left having a radius of 599.39 feet; thence running Northeasterly along the arc of said curve to the left and along the centerline of said industry spur track, a distance of 307.21 feet to the end of said curve; thence running North 21 degrees 05 minutes East tangent to said curve and along the centerline of said industry spur track, 151.69 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 532.18 feet; thence running Northeasterly along the arc of said curve to the right and along the centerline of said industry spur track 142.42 feet to its intersection with the Southeasterly right of way line of the Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad, said point being 48.93 feet Southwesterly from the North line of said Section 3 as measured along said Southeasterly right of way line; thence running Northeasterly along said Southeasterly right of way line 48.93 feet to a point in the North line of said Section 3; thence running East along said North line 146.4 feet, more or less to the Northwest corner of the parcel of land conveyed to St. John’s Evangelical Lutheran Church as recorded in Book 46 Deeds, Page 19, filed August 23, 1950; thence running South at right angles 593.85 feet; thence deflecting 53 degrees 47 minutes to the right and running Southwesterly parallel with the Northerly right of way line of the Chaska and Shakopee Road, 150 feet; thence deflecting 53 degrees 47 minutes to the left and running Southerly 175 feet to a point in the Northerly right of way line of the Chaska and Shakopee Road; thence running Southwesterly along said Northerly right of way line 1676.9 feet, more or less, to a point in a line drawn parallel with the West line of said Section 3 from the actual point of beginning; thence running North along said parallel line 367.62 feet, more or less, to the actual point of beginning. For the purpose of this description the West line of Section 3, Township 115, Range 23 is considered to be a due North and South line. Except that part lying West of the following described Line A: Commencing at a point on the West line of said Northwest Quarter distant 1655.37 feet Southerly from the Northwest corner thereof, said West line has an assumed bearing of South 0 degrees 33 minutes 32 seconds West, said point being on the Northerly line of the Chicago and North Western Railroad Company right of way; thence North 51 degrees 08 minutes 10 seconds East along said right of way line 1218.17 feet to the actual point of beginning of Line A to be described; thence South 23 degrees 43 minutes 37 seconds East 8.72 feet; thence Southerly 228.75 feet along a tangential curve 235 5 concave to the West having a radius of 510.00 feet and a central angle of 25 degrees 41 minutes 55 seconds; thence North 88 degrees 01 minutes 42 seconds West and not tangent to said curve 5.00 feet; thence Southerly 96.91 feet along a non-tangential curve concave to the West having a radius of 505.00 feet and a central angle of 10 degrees 59 minutes 41 seconds and a chord bearing of South 07 degrees 28 minutes 09 seconds West; thence South 12 degrees 57 minutes 59 seconds West, tangent to last described curve, 143.07 feet; thence Southerly 330.26 feet along a tangential curve concave to the East having a radius of 420.00 and a central angle of 45 degrees 03 minutes 13 seconds, and there terminating. AND Excepting therefrom the following described tract: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 115 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 3; thence on an assumed bearing of South 88 degrees 52 minutes 27 seconds East along the north line of said Northwest Quarter a distance of 2286.69 feet; thence South 01 degree 21 minutes 25 seconds West a distance of 195.90 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence South 52 degrees 44 minutes 44 seconds West a distance of 412.15 feet; thence South 34 degrees 48 minutes 12 seconds East to the intersection with the westerly line of the parcel conveyed to Northern States Power Company by the document recorded in Book 61 of Deeds, page 58, in the office of the Carver County Recorder; thence northerly along said westerly line to the northwesterly line of said conveyed parcel; thence northeasterly along said northwesterly line to the intersection with the westerly line of the parcel conveyed to St. John’s Evangelical Lutheran Church by the document recorded in Book 46 of Deeds, page 19, in the office of the Carver County Recorder; thence northerly along said west line to the intersection with a line bearing North 52 degrees 44 minutes 44 seconds East from the point of beginning; thence South 52 degrees 44 minutes 44 seconds West to the point of beginning. Abstract Property) Parcel 2: That part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 115 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the West line of said Section 3 distant 1795.7 feet South of the Northwest corner thereof, said point being in the Southeasterly right-of-way line of the Chicago and Northwestern Railroad Company; thence running Northeasterly along said right-of-way line 997.8 feet to a point (which point is the Northwest corner of the tract previously conveyed to American Sugar Company as described in Book 44 of Deeds at Page 8 thereof), which point is the true point of beginning of the tract conveyed; thence running South parallel with the West line of said Section 3, 272.18 feet to a point (which point is the Northwest corner of the tract previously conveyed to M. A. Gedney Company as described in Book 61 of Deeds at Page 251 thereof) in a curve having a radius of 694.69 feet, the radius point of said curve being South 46 degrees 57 minutes East 694.69 feet from said point; thence running Northeasterly along the Northwesterly line of the tract previously conveyed to M. A. Gedney Company as described in Book 61 of Deeds at Page 251 thereof and along the arc 236 6 of said curve to the right a distance of 89.72 feet to the end of said curve; thence running North 50 degrees 27 minutes East tangent to said curve 1270.56 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left having a radius of 599.39 feet; thence running Northeasterly along the arc of said curve to the left a distance of 307.21 feet to the end of said curve; thence running North 21 degrees 05 minutes East tangent to said curve 151.69 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 532.18 feet; thence running Northeasterly along the arc of said curve to the right 142.42 feet to its intersection with the Southeasterly right-of-way line of Chicago and Northwestern Railway Company railroad, said point being 48.93 feet Southwesterly from the North line of said Section 3 as measured along said Southeasterly right-of-way line; thence running Southwesterly along said Southeasterly right-of- way line of Chicago and Northwestern Railway Company railroad to the point of beginning. Except that part lying West of the following described Line A: Commencing at a point on the West line of said Northwest Quarter distant 1655.37 feet Southerly from the Northwest corner thereof, said West line has an assumed bearing of South 0 degrees 33 minutes 32 seconds West, said point being on the Northerly line of the Chicago and North Western Railroad Company right of way; thence North 51 degrees 08 minutes 10 seconds East along said right of way line 1218.17 feet to the actual point of beginning of Line A to be described; thence South 23 degrees 43 minutes 37 seconds East 8.72 feet; thence Southerly 228.75 feet along a tangential curve concave to the West having a radius of 510.00 feet and a central angle of 25 degrees 41 minutes 55 seconds; thence North 88 degrees 01 minutes 42 seconds West and not tangent to said curve 5.00 feet; thence Southerly 96.91 feet along a non-tangential curve concave to the West having a radius of 505.00 feet and a central angle of 10 degrees 59 minutes 41 seconds and a chord bearing of South 07 degrees 28 minutes 09 seconds West; thence South 12 degrees 57 minutes 59 seconds West, tangent to last described curve, 143.07 feet; thence Southerly 330.2 feet along a tangential curve concave to the East having a radius of 420.00 feet and a central angle of 45 degrees 03 minutes 13 seconds, and there terminating. Abstract Property) g:\plan\2021 planning cases\21-19 2100 stoughton ave (river valley industrial ctr)\findings of fact river valley industrial center_final.docx 237 COMMUilTTY OEVELOPilIEI{T OEPARTTTENT Phnning Division - 7700 Markct Boulevard Mailrng AddI3Bs - P O 8ox 147. Chanhass€n. MN 55317 P hon.: (952) 227-1 1 0 0 t F ex. 1952i, 227 .1 1 10 APPLICA FOR Srrbmrli.l oat J] crTYorcltAtlttAssrlt DEVELOPMENT REVIEW o",fl-EfJ-!l- so.oryRceow *" tol( [ >tv Secllon 1: Apphcalpn Type (check all that apply) lfur. b iL w99tle aaacer, dEd.frr ' b. rrcrrrld t.rtdll!/ E Comprchcnsrvc Phn Ancndmcnt .... ... .. t6OO3EMinorMUSIlin. for irrling on-!it! sav.rs tlOO E Cmditional Ur. Pcrmit (CUP) Srnglr-Family R6d.ncr ... $325flAllOh!r'.... .. .. .. . . t425 E tntcrim Usc Permit (tUP) el ln coojunslbn wirh Srngb-Fsnily R6rdcnc. . t325 LI All Ohcr!... . t425 t1lofln.,,r'i th', ttlug Go ry hE ryk iot1) Subdivi.ion lSl.JB) l, Bl creato 3 tots or lesr a lr cl l i Creatc ov.r 3lorr . S600 lob) l M6tqJ & Bound! (2 ror3) .. .. . . .. .. . S'15 par lot 300o D Rgzoning (REZ) lhml4fi fi' da'loqn"{ conl, d' Ptanned Unlt Oevelopment (PUO) . . . .. . t750 E Vacelix of Ea$rnsnt Rrght of-wly (VAC)... ..t300 E Mino, Amefidront to axBting PUD.. ......3100 (AddnDnrr rlcodirt 1... mrv splv) E Ait otrea .. .. . . ... ... .. . . . s500 Etr va.ianc" (vAR). .?I,*l^!.(,- ..1:!.1.r:.... . ., ., ,..$2jq- signpranRoviax . .. .... .. . $iso i w*,"noer"r",,#E!,*ynffi1"'*,u ""'" ' Srte Plan Rev6^, (SPR) E Singte-F.mily Rrrrdcncr. . . .. . .' ."' . .. 3150 Mministrativr. .. . . . .. S1OO lJ All Others $275 F 3ilTfi81'lt#t'3J,?iJl*'ro,r,*..11* El zoninsAppcar .. . .. . . .s1oo 9?.f tho'/s.nd lquaG fc.l) 5nor CiO:111 OE Zonrng Ordrnanc. Am.ndmant (ZOA) SSOO' lrdud! n nb.r oltllll8g..n lorcc6 - i{-- -- - - - tndl(la lrmbt o, @ amrtoyaaa: o Sng;*"*:ffi;- s5oo tr;,.ffiJ:iijrEH?X"'[,1ffi#ffi:* E Notification Sign {cny ro,^x.fl.nd rclnol,r) ... -.. .. -. i., .t .t200 Property ownea' Lilt within 5oo' (cr., ro gener.r.6le. p'r-.ppr""ri*,,,*t ngt...fJ'^ ng i11L1 ' n, L]i5i". *0.* Leddr$8e8) E Escrow for Recording Oocuments (ch€ck allthat apply) ....... .$50 p.r docum€nt E Conditional Ws Pemit I tntcrim u3e P€rmit E Sita P]ro AgBsmsnt E Vacation E Variancc E w6tland Alteration Psrmil E Maes & Sounds SuMivBion (3 docs.) E Eascm.nts (- eascments) tr Dscd! TOTAL FEE: Consolidate Lots . .. . .. .. . 8150 Lot Linr Adtustmcnl. ........... $150 F,nat ptat.... (?,r(,r& t.,t)ta\t!.w) $ioo lnc uda3 t450 6crow for attomay co6ts)' Addtronal claro* m!y be raqurl.d for oltar agplicanons tr D d S€ction 2: Required lntormation Oescriptron of proposal ,VDgrvtrtoNl .f 6\r{f\P t ft>cCc 171. lrtt L4r I tfiYlvl,," t€qevJ F\y Ottltvc\aetl .f 0tlL t.'9"'1^'t.L rvrV1,rta 7 tr'r, Total Acreage Pr$ent Zoning xl Wetlands Present?f ves fi trto Rcqu*tedZonrngfez tD r o??tct .|Jo Requested Land Us€ DesrgnationPresentLandUseO*€nation 0F(t Lt tPD- Exrsting Use of Propsny ?rtlttL f r..Dv, j:oL!: yglN f t li!:1 crTY OFECHANIIASSEN AUG 0 6 2021 tAlstASS$ n AMlltlG DwI lcrrect< box if separate narBtive is attached Propcrly Address or L ocation Parcet t -?5!9)97!9- LegatoffJcnptio: ,er 5w P'tc\ / frtvt^Pbt1 y''ff 238 Seclion 3: Property Owner and Applicant lnrornEtion M/k APPLICANT OTHER TI{AN PROPERW OWNER: ln ligning thiE epplication, l. ac applic.nt, r.pres€nt to nave obrerned authorrzelon from thc property owner to fila this applicslion I agre€ to bs bound by cond[ron! ot approval, subjcct only to the oght lo oblact at lha haanngs on th! applrcatroo or during the appesl penod. ll thia applcalion hlr not baan 3ignld oy tha prop.rty ovi/n€r. I havc atiached 3sp.rale docu,nenteton of tull l€981 cspacrty to filc lhr applicatlon Thl3 apptrcation should bc proc4$ed in my name end I am tha pady whom th. City 3hould cont*t rcgardlng any mattar po.taining to thr! spplicittion. I will h€ap myserl rnform€d of tha dcadline! for tubmirlron ot meteriel and tha p.ogra$ ol thB Eppticetion. I fu(her understBnd that addiuonsl fees may be charged tor consuning facs, foasibility studbs. 6tc. with an e3trmat pnor to any authorization to proc€ad ryith thc study I crrtify lhat thr ntormation and gxhibrts submalted are true and corrscl Address Contact Phone: City/Stde/Zip Email: Cell Fax Date PROPERTY OW[{ER: ln signing this application, l, as properly owner, have lull eget c.pscity to .nd hE lby do. authorize thc filino ot this applicetion. I undeBtand that conditions of approval arc bindlng and agre. to bc bound by thos€ cond(roflS, 3ubrscl only lo the right to object at the hearings or dunng the appeal peflods I wi I ksep my$f rnformed of tha dcodlirc! tor |ubmisEron of mderial and the progress of lhis applcetLcn. I lunhar understand that addilEnal foa3 may be chargrd tor consuttrng fe€s, leasibilily stud e3 etc. with an $limats prior to 6ny authorizAion to proce€d with lhr sludy. I ccrlify that the information and exhibits submined are true snd corr6ct. X Narnc Add.esE Cityi Siate/Zip Contact Phon€. Csll. Fax: Dalo g c Err arl Srgnatu PROJECT ENGINEER (if applrcablc) Naffo: bl€sf wo.o ?lt if+s,c.tv I € t',t re j Addte33 Contast Phone D rt,tgv et A. r 1EL.1oc.1 415 b:1,1t0, 141>. L-)./Lae-r-r This appti:af$n must Ue complctod in t[[ and must bc accompanEd by all anformation and plam required by applrc.bla City Ordinence provisions. Eefor8 filing this applicaton. refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confor with ths Plaflnrng Oeparlmaot to dctrfmin€ the spccific ordinance and applicable procedural requirBmenB and f€€g A determinatbn of completeness ol the application shall bo made withrn 15 business days ol application submittal. A writtcn noticc of applicatron deficienclcs shall be mailed to the applicant withrn 15 busine$ days of application. Who should receive copies of staff reports? Property Owner Vra: El Email Other Contact lnlormatlon: Etrlrj Ema I Email Emarl Appli=nt Engneer Olher' trtrtr Marted Paper Copy Marl6d Paper Copy Mailed Paper Copy Aodress tr El Mailad Papsr copy City/Statezip: Email. iIS!19!!LI9jEE!EAXI: Complete allnecessary form fields, then select SAVE FORM to savo a copy to your devic" PRINT FORM and d.laver to city along with required documonts and payment SUBMIT FORM to s€nd a digital copy to the c y for proce3srng PRLNT TORM SUBUIT FORU Name Srgnaturc Crty/Statdzip: nll,.c tp,tv,, f1) 5t| 4n CaL Emar, dan. lt L'. F wtst vJool ?t,t,^a Fu.. Section 4: Notficalion lntormation No-o 239 POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHFFE=759. 46FFE= 760. 00SSTEEEESPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHTRANSMISSIONLINETOWERBUILDINGELECTRICCABINETTRANSMISSIONLINEEASEMENTPER DOC NO. A455245AUDUBONROAD CHASKA BLVD. ( COUNTY ROAD 61) STOUGHTON AVENUEAREA NOT FULLYSURVEYED125. 0 0 SSSSSTROCK LANDSCAPINGGUARD RAILWEMAILTCRYSTAL LANEC- STORERIGHT-INEXISTING BITUMINOUSEXISTING178, 753 SF81, 660 SF BUILDINGFFE = 762. 50DOCK ELEV = 758.5078959109810861011NO PARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGINFILTRATION PONDBOTTOM ELV = 754.00OUTLET ELEV = 756.50100-YR HWL = 756.68INFILTRATION SWALEBOTTOM ELV = 754. 240 River Valley Industrial Center - Project Narrative August 3, 2021 The proposed project, River Valley Industrial Center will be a Class A multi-tenant industrial facility. It is our intent to design the facility so that it is divisible down to 7,500sf with each tenant having their own recessed entry along with dock and drive in access to their warehouse. This small bay market has been ignored by developers in the Twin Cities for years. We believe this building could create a base of smaller users that will hopefully grow in the Chanhassen and Chaska communities in the years to come. We are a family based, local real estate company (our offices are in Chaska) with 1.5 million square feet of mostly industrial property. It is our intent to remain in the community and be long term holders of this proposed building. Plans for the building and site work are being submitted by our architectural and civil engineering consultants. The proposed access for automobile traffic will be off of Audubon Road and truck traffic from Stoughton Avenue. The planned curb cut location off of Audubon is important for ease of access into the development area and the success of the project. The previously submitted traffic report supports the location of the proposed access point and shows the locations of new pavement markings on Audubon Road to provide adequate traffic control and turn lanes for the project entrance. Since there is no available public sanitary sewer and watermain service for the development, there will be a private onsite septic system and new water well constructed to support the project. The location of the proposed septic and well facilities are shown on the Utility Plan. The new well will be used for domestic water needs within the proposed building. The existing onsite well and storage tank will be used for supplying water to the building’s fire suppression system and the fire hydrants being proposed on the property. We look forward to a successful development in your community and would invite you to contact me or any of our development team for questions about this project. Thank you! Joel Buttenhoff Cornerstone Investors LLC 102 Jonathan Blvd. N #200 Chaska MN 55318 241 WEST ELEVATION LEFT HALF 8 9 101176 WEST ELEVATION - RIGHT HALF 3412 5 6 NORTHWEST ELEVATION concrete trowelled bands exposed aggregate metal at entrances aluminum dr framing solar grey glass CBA SOUTH ELEVATION 734526 345126 EAST ELEVATION - RIGHT HALF 891011 7 EAST ELEVATION - LEFT HALF WEST ELEVATION 1 2 NORTHWESTELEVATIONNORTHELEVATION ACB EAST ELEVATION RIVER VALLEY INDUSTRIAL CENTER RIVER VALLEY INDUSTRIAL CENTER RIVER VALLEY INDUSTRIAL CHANHASSEN. MN SPEC. OFFICES FOR: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Aug 26, ‘21 242 charcoal colored metal panels red w/ black accent colored aggregate in concrete lights grey concrete horizontal and vertical accent bands light grey window framing w/ smoke colored glass RIVER VALLEY INDUSTRIAL CENTER RIVER VALLEY INDUSTRIAL CENTER RIVER VALLEY INDUSTRIAL CHANHASSEN. MN SPEC. OFFICES FOR: FINISH MATERIALS AND COLORS 243 PARTIAL WEST ELEVATION PARTIAL NORTHWEST ELEVATION NORTHWEST ELEVATION PARTIAL WEST ELEVATION RIVER VALLEY INDUSTRIAL CENTER RIVER VALLEY INDUSTRIAL CENTER RIVER VALLEY INDUSTRIAL CHANHASSEN. MN SPEC. OFFICES FOR: FINISH MATERIALS AND COLORS 1200exterior building materials on facade viewed by the public: Total facade to 12’height = 820x12 = 9840 sq ft North: entrys and windows - 164 sq ft articulation-troweled conc - 96 textured panels - 960 NW: entrys and windows - 600 sq ft textured panels(below wdw) - 120 West: entrys and windows - 1896 sq ft articulation-troweled conc - 1392 textured panels - 2832 South: entrys and windows - 136 sq ft articulation-troweled conc - 96 textured panels - 224 troweled conc panels - 1344 entrys and windows - 2796 sq ft 28% articulation-troweled conc - 1584 16 textured panels - 4136 42 troweled conc panels - 1344 14 foundation plantings 511’x30” hi overstory trees @ building 6 upper level windows provided TOTALS Aug 26, ‘21 244 Carver County Public Works 11360 Highway 212, Suite 1 Cologne, MN 55322 Office (952) 466-5200 | Fax (952) 466-5223 | www.co.carver.mn.us CARVER COUNTY August 26, 2021 City of Chanhassen c/o Bob Generous AICP Senior Planner 952-227-1131 bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Re: Development / Access Review Comments: Preliminary Plat and Site Plan for 2100 Stoughton Avenue (River Valley Industrial Center) located at PID #250030700 and 301370090 adjacent to County State Aid Highway 61 (Chaska Blvd.) and the intersection of CSAH 61/CSAH 15/Audubon Rd. Thank you for the opportunity to review the subject development in the City of Chanhassen. The County assumes compliance with State Statute 505.03 Subdivision 2 regarding road authority review. Consistent with the County Comprehensive Plan and County Codes, the following are comments and recommended conditions of approval and potential requirements for any necessary permits to be issued for the project: 1. Regarding access a. No direct access to CSAH 61 is proposed. Additional County review and approval will be required if this condition changes. b. The proposed access from the site to Audubon Rd. (City street) is approximately 350 ft. from the intersection of CSAH 61/CSAH 15/Audubon Rd. and shows planned impacts to the left turn lane serving the southern leg of the intersection. New local road access on local roads near County intersections is guided to be approximately 660 ft. from the intersection or at the greatest distance possible considering site constraints in order to avoid impacts to turn lanes serving the County Highway intersection and to minimize conflicts with traffic turning on to and off of the County Highway. In addition, the adopted CSAH 61/TH 41 Corridor Study final report identifies the future roadway concept for this intersection, which includes a median on the south leg of the intersection for at least 400 ft. south of the intersection (Link to adopted study, See page 39). i. Revise the proposed site plan regarding the access on Audubon Rd. to remove the access or shift it further south for consistency with adopted corridor study and to mitigate impacts to the CSAH 61/CSAH 15/Audubon Rd. intersection. 2. Regarding highway right of way a. CSAH 61 at this location is a 2-lane undivided rural roadway facility with a continuous left turn lane and no trail facilities. The existing total right of way is approximately 115 ft. with approximately 55 ft. from centerline on the southeast side adjacent to the subject parcel. b. The County’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan (Figure B.6) identifies typical section widths for existing and future County highway facilities. The planned future typical section for this highway, per corridor study, is for a 2-lane divided urban roadway with the trail on the 245 southeast side, which requires 65 ft. from centerline. i. Revise the preliminary plat to incorporate a minimum of 10 ft. additional right of way dedication adjacent to CSAH 61 from the existing right of way for a total of 65 ft. from centerline. ii. A sight triangle right of way dedication from the required right of way dedication for 100 feet along CSAH 61 and 80 feet along Audubon Rd. is required on the southeast corner of the CSAH 61/CSAH 15/Audubon Rd. intersection. iii. Right of way along Audubon Rd. should be preserved by dedication for consistency with the CSAH 61/Audubon Rd. intersection plans as well as for any future pedestrian facilities planned by the Cities such as a sidewalk or trail along the east side of Audubon Rd. 3. Regarding pedestrian facilities a. There is currently no pedestrian crossing infrastructure for the south or eastern legs of the CSAH 61/CSAH 15/Audubon Rd. intersection adjacent to the proposed development. i. Work with the County to install crosswalk and pedestrian traffic signal system improvements for the southern and eastern legs of the intersection including installation of ADA compliant curb ramp(s) at the southeast corner of the intersection adjacent to the proposed development. An internal pedestrian connection on the site from this corner is recommended. 4. Regarding traffic impacts a. The memo titled Buttenhoff Industrial Trip Generation and Access dated June 30, 2021 did not include analysis of the CSAH 61/CSAH 15/Audubon Rd. intersection. i. Traffic operations need to be studied and reviewed for the CSAH 61/CSAH 15/Audubon Rd. intersection. Information is needed regarding the northbound left from Audubon Rd. onto CSAH 61 to analyze the impact of the added traffic to the intersection. Coordinate with County staff regarding traffic split assignments, trip generation calculations, and future traffic projections to use for this analysis. ii. Provide truck turning templates to and from CSAH 61 and for each turn lane on Audubon Rd. 5. Regarding final approval and permitting a. The County will need to review and approve the final grading plans adjacent to CSAH 61. A grading permit will be required for grading work within the highway right of way. b. The technical details of the final plat, its boundaries and form(s) will need to be reviewed and approved by the County Surveyor. c. Prior to any work affecting or on County highways or in County right of way, the applicant shall coordinate plans with the County Engineer and obtain a Utility or Excavating/Filling/Grading Permit(s) from Carver County Public Works: https://www.co.carver.mn.us/departments/public-works/quick-links/permits). Final details of locations, grades, and profiles affecting County roads as well as any utility connections will need to be reviewed and approved prior to any permits. d. Any damages, modifications, or changes incurred on County highways from current or 246 approved conditions will need to remedied or updated at development expense, including costs incurred by the County. These are the County’s comments at this time. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please contact staff noted below: Joan Guthmiller Administrative Technician Carver County Public Works 952.466.5201 jguthmiller@co.carver.mn.us Angie Stenson AICP Sr. Transportation Planner Carver County Public Works 952.466.5273 astenson@co.carver.mn.us Dan McCormick, P.E. PTOE Traffic Services Supervisor Carver County Public Works 952.466.5208 dmccormick@co.carver.mn.us 247 248 MEMORANDUM TBPLS Firm No. 10074302 Date: June 30, 2021 Re: Buttenhoff Industrial Trip Generation and Access File #0024684.00 To: Daniel Parks, P.E., Senior Project Manager From: Paul Villaluz, P.E., PTOE, RSP1 Christopher Topacio This memorandum has been prepared to address the following transportation-related aspects of the proposed 82,500 square foot Buttenhoff Industrial project: Trip Generation Trip Distribution Trip Assignment Total Intersection Volumes Left Turn Storage Bay Analysis A Preliminary Concept Site Plan is shown on the next page. Trip Generation The 10th Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation Manual was used to estimate the number of vehicle trips that could be generated by the project. This manual is a standard reference used by municipalities and public agencies throughout the United States. The trip generation characteristics included in the manual are summarized by general land use type and are based on actual trip generation studies performed at numerous locations in areas of various populations. Trip generation for the proposed Buttenhoff Industrial project is based on average rates during the AM and PM peak hours for a general light industrial land use (ITE Land Use Code 110). The resulting trip generation is summarized in Table 1. Calculations are provided in Appendix A. 249 789512899891086INFILTRATIONPONDPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHXXXXXXXXXXXSSTEEEESPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANBUILDINGTRANSMISSION LINE EASEMENTPER DOC NO. A455245AUDUBON ROAD STATE HIGWAYNO. 212STOUGHTON AVENUE125 00 30.00' 25.00' PARKING SETBACK BUILDING SETBACKTRUCK ENTRANCEFULL ACCESSAUTO ONLY ENTRANCEPROPOSEDLOT = 9.01 AC12'62'35. 29' 250 June 30, 2021 Page 3 0024684.00 Table 1 – Buttenhoff Industrial Trip Generation ITE Code Land Use Size Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total 110 General Light Industrial 82.5 ksf GFA 205 204 409 51 7 58 7 45 52 Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 10th Edition According to the latest ITE Trip Generation Manual (see Appendix A), trucks are anticipated to comprise 3% of the AM peak hour trips and 2% of the PM peak hour trips. Using these percentages, two trucks are anticipated to access the site during the AM peak hour and one truck is anticipated to access the site during the PM peak hour. Trip Distribution The directional distribution of project traffic quantifies the percentage of project-generated traffic that arrives and departs the project site in each direction by type of use. The primary trip distribution quantifies the percentage of site-generated traffic that generally arrives and departs the project site along the same route. Primary trips are new trips to the street network and project driveways. Figure 1 illustrates the anticipated primary project trip distribution for the Buttenhoff Industrial project. The primary trip distribution is based on anticipated access restrictions and internal circulation through each project driveway, anticipated trip origins and destinations with the surrounding areas, and engineering judgment. It is assumed that 90% of the total trip vehicles cars and trucks) will access the site via the Audubon driveway. It is assumed that both proposed driveway locations will have full access – no left or right turn movements into and out of the driveway locations will be prohibited. Trip Assignment Project traffic assignment was calculated by applying the primary trip distribution percentages found in Figure 1 to the primary project trip generation found in Table 1. The resulting traffic assignments at the intersections are illustrated in Figure 2 for the primary trip assignment. 251 POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHXFFE=759.46FFE=760.00SSTEEEESPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHTRANSMISSIONLINE TOWERBUILDINGRETAINING WALLELECTRICCABINETTRANSMISSION LINE EASEMENTPER DOC NO. A455245AUDUBONROADSTATE HIGWAY NO. 212STOUGHTON AVENUEAREA NOT SURVEYED125. 252 POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHXFFE=759.46FFE=760.00SSTEEEESPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHTRANSMISSIONLINE TOWERBUILDINGRETAINING WALLELECTRICCABINETTRANSMISSION LINE EASEMENTPER DOC NO. A455245AUDUBONROADSTATE HIGWAY NO. 212STOUGHTON AVENUEAREA NOT SURVEYED125. 253 June 30, 2021 Page 4 0024684.00 Total Intersection Volumes In order to approximate intersection operations at the two project driveway locations, Annual Daily Traffic (ADT) information was collected at Audubon Road and at Stoughton Avenue from the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT Traffic Forecasting & Analysis, 2018). Figure 3. ADT information on Stoughton Avenue Figure 4. ADT information on Audubon Road It is assumed that both of the peak hours represent 10% of the ADT. The assumed vehicles per hour were calculated by taking 10% of the most recent ADT and dividing it by 2 to indicate how many vehicles will travel in each direction. Therefore, 189 vehicles per hour (3750 x 0.10 =375. 375/2 = 188.5) are assumed to travel northbound and southbound during both AM and PM peak hours along Audubon Road at Project Driveway A. 115 vehicles per hour (2300 x 0.10 =230. 230/2= 115) are assumed to travel eastbound and westbound along Stoughton Avenue at Project Driveway B. These volumes have been added to trip assignment in Figure 2. Total volumes are included on Figure 5. 254 POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHXFFE=759.46FFE=760.00SSTEEEESPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHTRANSMISSIONLINE TOWERBUILDINGRETAINING WALLELECTRICCABINETTRANSMISSION LINE EASEMENTPER DOC NO. A455245AUDUBONROADSTATE HIGWAY NO. 212STOUGHTON AVENUEAREA NOT SURVEYED125. 255 June 30, 2021 Page 5 0024684.00 Left Turn Storage Bay Analysis Left turn storage bay analyses for the study intersections are provided for the projected conditions with site. The analyses are based on the traffic volumes as illustrated in Figure 3. The analysis uses the 95th percentile left turn queue lengths reported by Vistro (see Appendix B). Table 2 summarizes the results of the analysis. The desired storage reported in Table 2 is the larger of the AM and PM values. Table 2 - Left Turn Storage Bay Analysis Intersection Left Turn Movement Available/Desired Storage per Lane (ft) Existing Projected Conditions with Site Storage Vistro Queue Intersection Control Unsignalized Intersection #2 Audubon Road and Project Driveway A WB On-Site 1.17’ SB 100’ 2.28’ Intersection Control Unsignalized Intersection #4 Stoughton Avenue and Project Driveway B EB Shared 0.66’ SB On-Site 0.71’ Conclusions and Recommendations Figure 6 illustrates the proposed intersection markings on Audubon Road at the Project Driveway. A 100-foot long storage bay length for southbound ingressing left turn traffic will be provided on Audubon Road. This proposed left turn storage bay is anticipated to have adequate storage for the projected demand. 256 POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHSSTEEEAUDUBON ROADFULL ACCESSAUTO ONLY ENTRANCEINFILTRATIONPONDSTOUGHTON AVENUEPROPOSED INDUSTRIAL BUILDING81,660 SFSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE: PREPARED 257 June 22, 2021 0024684.00 APPENDIX A TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS APPENDIX C OF TRIP GENERATION MANUAL 258 Buttenhoff Industrial ITE Trip Generation - 10th Edition Equation Type: T = Average Vehicle Trip Ends AM Peak Hour One hour between 7AM to 9AM (Adjacent Street) T = 1,000 SF GFA Entering Exiting T = Entering*Exiting* Rounding may occur in calculations PM Peak Hour One hour between 4PM to 6PM (Adjacent Street) T = 1,000 SF GFA Entering*Exiting T = Entering*Exiting* Rounding may occur in calculations Weekday Daily Weekday T = 1,000 SF GFA Entering Exiting T = Entering*Exiting* Rounding may occur in calculations Pass-By Reduction AM AM PM PM AM AM PM PM Rounding may occur in calculations *Rounding may occur in calculations General Light Industrial 0 Entering 0 Exiting 0% 0% Non Pass-By Trip Ends:Pass-By Trip Ends: 0 Entering 0ExitingEntering Entering Exiting Exiting7 51 7 45 Variable (X):1,000 SF GFA Number of (X):82.5 58 52 CIT R0031776.000 Land Use Code: Average Rate 110 X) *0.63 Trip Ends Per 13%87% Trip Ends 7 45 Trip Ends 51 Project Name: TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS Calculations by:Date:Project #:June 07, 2021 100% X) *4.96 Trip Ends Per 50%50% Directional Distribution: Trip Ends 205205409 100% Non Pass-By Trip End Percentage Pass-By Trip End Percentage 7 Directional Distribution: Directional Distribution: X) *0.70 Trip Ends Per 88%12% 259 260 June 22, 2021 0024684.00 APPENDIX B VISTRO CALCULATIONS 261 0.004VolumetoCapacity (v/c): BLevelOfService: 12.0Delay (sec / veh): 15minutesAnalysisPeriod: HCM 6thEditionAnalysisMethod: Two-waystopControlType: Intersection 7: Audubon Road and Project Driveway A Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00ExitPocketLength [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00EntryPocketLength [ft] 100110No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00LaneWidth [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurningMovement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Project DrivewayAAudubonRoadAudubonRoadName Intersection Setup 000PedestrianVolume [ped/h] 522094010205TotalAnalysisVolume [veh/h] 115210251Total15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000OtherAdjustmentFactor 0.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.9200PeakHourFactor 52192379189TotalHourlyVolume [veh/h] 000000OtherVolume [veh/h] 000000ExistingSiteAdjustmentVolume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000DivertedTrips [veh/h] 5243791Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000GrowthFactor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00HeavyVehiclesPercentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000BaseVolumeAdjustmentFactor 0018800188BaseVolumeInput [veh/h] Project DrivewayAAudubonRoadAudubonRoadName Volumes Scenario 3: 3 AMWSButtenhoffIndustrial 6/22/2021 1 Version 2021 (SP 0-3) Generated with 262 BIntersectionLOS 0.81d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BAAApproachLOS 10.091.240.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.450.290.002.280.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.020.010.000.090.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] ABAAAAMovementLOS 9.3311.970.007.740.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.010.000.000.030.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000NumberofStorageSpacesinMedian NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000StorageArea [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriorityScheme Intersection Settings Scenario 3: 3 AMWSButtenhoffIndustrial 6/22/2021 2 Version 2021 (SP 0-3) Generated with 263 0.001VolumetoCapacity (v/c): ALevelOfService: 8.9Delay (sec / veh): 15minutesAnalysisPeriod: HCM 6thEditionAnalysisMethod: Two-waystopControlType: Intersection 12: Stoughton Avenue and Project Driveway B Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00ExitPocketLength [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00EntryPocketLength [ft] 000010No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00LaneWidth [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurningMovement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach StoughtonAvenueStoughtonAvenueProjectDrivewayBName Intersection Setup 000PedestrianVolume [ped/h] 1130126510TotalAnalysisVolume [veh/h] 03332100Total15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000OtherAdjustmentFactor 0.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.9200PeakHourFactor 1120116510TotalHourlyVolume [veh/h] 000000OtherVolume [veh/h] 000000ExistingSiteAdjustmentVolume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000DivertedTrips [veh/h] 151510Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000GrowthFactor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00HeavyVehiclesPercentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000BaseVolumeAdjustmentFactor 0115115000BaseVolumeInput [veh/h] StoughtonAvenueStoughtonAvenueProjectDrivewayBName Volumes Scenario 3: 3 AMWSButtenhoffIndustrial 6/22/2021 3 Version 2021 (SP 0-3) Generated with 264 AIntersectionLOS 0.18d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAAApproachLOS 0.000.298.92d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.260.260.080.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.010.010.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] AAAAABMovementLOS 0.000.000.007.488.9210.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000NumberofStorageSpacesinMedian NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000StorageArea [veh] Flared Lane FreeFreeStopPriorityScheme Intersection Settings Scenario 3: 3 AMWSButtenhoffIndustrial 6/22/2021 4 Version 2021 (SP 0-3) Generated with 265 Turning Movement Volume: Detail 6/22/2021ReportFile: N:\...\X_AM WS.pdf Scenario 3 AMWSVistroFile: N:\...\210607 Buttenhoff Industrial Vistro.vistro Buttenhoff Industrial 243 0 13 0 230 Total Volume 1 0 1 0 1.00 0 Right 120 0 5 0 1.00 115 Thru Westbound 116 0 1 0 1.00 115 Thru 5 0 5 0 1.00 0 Left Eastbound 1 0 1 0 1.00 0 Right 0 0 0 0 1.00 0 Left Southbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Factor Final Base Stoughton Avenue and Project Driveway B 12 VolumeTypeIntersectionNameID 434 0 58 0 376 Total Volume 5 0 5 0 1.00 0 Right 2 0 2 0 1.00 0 Left Westbound 192 0 4 0 1.00 188 Thru 37 0 37 0 1.00 0 Left Southbound 9 0 9 0 1.00 0 Right 189 0 1 0 1.00 188 Thru Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Factor Final Base Audubon Road and Project Driveway A 7 VolumeTypeIntersectionNameID Scenario 3: 3 AMWSButtenhoffIndustrial 6/22/2021 5 Version 2021 (SP 0-3) Generated with 266 0.015VolumetoCapacity (v/c): BLevelOfService: 11.3Delay (sec / veh): 15minutesAnalysisPeriod: HCM 6thEditionAnalysisMethod: Two-waystopControlType: Intersection 7: Audubon Road and Project Driveway A Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00ExitPocketLength [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00EntryPocketLength [ft] 100110No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00LaneWidth [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurningMovement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Project DrivewayAAudubonRoadAudubonRoadName Intersection Setup 000PedestrianVolume [ped/h] 35920552209TotalAnalysisVolume [veh/h] 92511152Total15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000OtherAdjustmentFactor 0.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.9200PeakHourFactor 32818952192TotalHourlyVolume [veh/h] 000000OtherVolume [veh/h] 000000ExistingSiteAdjustmentVolume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000DivertedTrips [veh/h] 3281524Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000GrowthFactor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00HeavyVehiclesPercentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000BaseVolumeAdjustmentFactor 0018800188BaseVolumeInput [veh/h] Project DrivewayAAudubonRoadAudubonRoadName Volumes Scenario 4: 4 PMWSButtenhoffIndustrial 6/22/2021 1 Version 2021 (SP 0-3) Generated with 267 BIntersectionLOS 1.02d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAAApproachLOS 9.880.180.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 3.291.170.000.280.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.130.050.000.010.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] ABAAAAMovementLOS 9.5211.250.007.660.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.040.020.000.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000NumberofStorageSpacesinMedian NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000StorageArea [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriorityScheme Intersection Settings Scenario 4: 4 PMWSButtenhoffIndustrial 6/22/2021 2 Version 2021 (SP 0-3) Generated with 268 0.001VolumetoCapacity (v/c): ALevelOfService: 9.9Delay (sec / veh): 15minutesAnalysisPeriod: HCM 6thEditionAnalysisMethod: Two-waystopControlType: Intersection 12: Stoughton Avenue and Project Driveway B Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00ExitPocketLength [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00EntryPocketLength [ft] 000010No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00LaneWidth [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurningMovement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach StoughtonAvenueStoughtonAvenueProjectDrivewayBName Intersection Setup 000PedestrianVolume [ped/h] 0126130141TotalAnalysisVolume [veh/h] 03233010Total15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000OtherAdjustmentFactor 0.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.9200PeakHourFactor 0116120141TotalHourlyVolume [veh/h] 000000OtherVolume [veh/h] 000000ExistingSiteAdjustmentVolume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000DivertedTrips [veh/h] 015141Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000GrowthFactor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00HeavyVehiclesPercentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000BaseVolumeAdjustmentFactor 0115115000BaseVolumeInput [veh/h] StoughtonAvenueStoughtonAvenueProjectDrivewayBName Volumes Scenario 4: 4 PMWSButtenhoffIndustrial 6/22/2021 3 Version 2021 (SP 0-3) Generated with 269 AIntersectionLOS 0.20d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAAApproachLOS 0.000.069.12d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.050.050.330.1095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.000.000.010.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] AAAAAAMovementLOS 0.000.000.007.478.919.94d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000NumberofStorageSpacesinMedian NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000StorageArea [veh] Flared Lane FreeFreeStopPriorityScheme Intersection Settings Scenario 4: 4 PMWSButtenhoffIndustrial 6/22/2021 4 Version 2021 (SP 0-3) Generated with 270 Turning Movement Volume: Detail 6/22/2021ReportFile: N:\...\X_PM WS.pdf Scenario 4 PMWSVistroFile: N:\...\210607 Buttenhoff Industrial Vistro.vistro Buttenhoff Industrial 242 0 12 0 230 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 1.00 0 Right 116 0 1 0 1.00 115 Thru Westbound 120 0 5 0 1.00 115 Thru 1 0 1 0 1.00 0 Left Eastbound 4 0 4 0 1.00 0 Right 1 0 1 0 1.00 0 Left Southbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Factor Final Base Stoughton Avenue and Project Driveway B 12 VolumeTypeIntersectionNameID 428 0 52 0 376 Total Volume 32 0 32 0 1.00 0 Right 8 0 8 0 1.00 0 Left Westbound 189 0 1 0 1.00 188 Thru 5 0 5 0 1.00 0 Left Southbound 2 0 2 0 1.00 0 Right 192 0 4 0 1.00 188 Thru Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Factor Final Base Audubon Road and Project Driveway A 7 VolumeTypeIntersectionNameID Scenario 4: 4 PMWSButtenhoffIndustrial 6/22/2021 5 Version 2021 (SP 0-3) Generated with 271 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss. COUNTYOFCARVER ) Kim City C k Subscribed and thiQ(z9day o S to befo me f SGCKLING l.aobry PlJilo.lt ln Esta ra,Od -oi E?ara It ll' ,E!a Notary Public 2021 CITY OF CHANHASSEN I, Kim T. Meuwissen, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on August 26, 2021, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk ofthe City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy ofthe attached notice of Public Hearing to Consider a Request for Subdivision of Two Parcels into Three Lots and One Outlot and Site Ptan Review for Development of an Approximately 82'000 SF One-Story Offrce-Warehouse Building @iver Valley Industrial Center), Zoned Industrial Office Park IOP), Planning Case No.202l-19 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy ofsaid notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses ofsuch owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota" and by other appropriate records. JEAN M 272 Subiect Parcel OiBclaimer This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a suNey and is .ot intended to be used as one. This map is a compilatton of records, informatlon and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources rcgarding the area shown, and is to be u+d for reference purposes only. The City does not wanant that lhe Geographic lnformation Sysiem (GlS) Data used to prepare this map are eror free. and the Cily does not represent that the Gls Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other pwpose requidng exacting measurement of distance or dhecton or precjsion in the depiction of geographic features. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota statutes s466.03, subd. 2'1 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims and agrees to deEnd, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by lJser, its employees or agents, or thid partjes which arise out of the use,'s access or use of data Provided. TAX_NAME,D TAX-ADD_LI D TAX ADD L2D Next RecordD(TAX_NAME)D TAX_ADD_Ll )t TAX ADD L2D Obclaimer This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one This map is a compilaton of records. information and data located in various city, county, state and federal offi@s and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used ior reference purposes only. The Clty does not wanant that the Geographic lnfomation System (GlS) Data used to prepa.e this map are enor free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacling measurement of distance ol direction or precision in the depiction of geographic featu.es. The preceding disclaimer is provrded pursuant to Minnesota statutes s466.03, SuM. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable lor any damages, and expressly waives all daims, and agrees to defend, indemnify. and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User. its employees or agents, or third partes which arjse oul of the us€is access or use of data provided. A Subject Parcel 273 qo F. O,oo5OE( o 6€ NEo6i(\ E 3EEo Eed- oE j-q EE OE. r! E2 @ o) ooFt- tli o) o E( 5 c ocaoo EbfrE:6Y;EoEa E+ E93YoEqEE; o.9iHt > tl-- o;o= E E 5d A G- U Eo*8b 6 Q .9 o cv- ttE (5N f, E=3Ea5OE Ho6Igotr: oiNEi3g, EESE o-9 6 -6 J ot o c oco o-( I, o- cc o) l d) o) o oi o I o p o> EO> E< E 6.e E' Or @E tst N< Ic.r0f-Eto -^ r O€ E'= E E 1,E€ EE 5 EEee B re E' i€ s,e Et:E gEEE gEE! FEsP !sE; EEsP HEee- EE:B ;iEgF EgEE ;EEiE EE =,ES.EFgdr= (,, (5 o6+9F(EC(JU,rN(9\t q^(, l6i.>c' ;ioB;,= PA::e EEEE 5EB P s)o)P; !- o l\ c (5-c 6 c=F(!_Qyc) cO- (D-cEqc6P(E:L " (tE E:E"iEaBE;s 8 8.,4fi9o (t)-c f =^ cp:.EE; B€= 5cXtsodC) B=-9, o, or'E Fii E E.EEFF oi NoN o E oollt C' i; aooEdbqo: =c - E3i8qo6 co = t=:r il ; 8 gl: 6 ql o(E !te* El3; tt8o ._jt-c O YJ(J'6'(9rxolo*fl >r(,) ol- Fl-< ol(., 6N EtgTEES) E ots; o (o 6 o E 2 o a't o) g o) o- ci- Ei! q) oo) E8 rlra56 orB OCb9-ot PE6s) EC) f_oo_ ig 6+ 0'ro-/, o='=o oF-! a f a. 9 o 0) E c fc E c 0) o. c, cocq' 6 uioEcoo)( E o)ocv l,)/n d)v Eq; 5E€ o,} l 9. -(r, 65Eoo0) qo iHo: 9!!+ CJ(\,O 6(! EI" o6oo,> .; o,o=p6 eEo< cEo)L6ui 9urHz.& ffig EE;EE IE,EEEi iEEEiEgEEEiBiEii EeE iiffiEEggEiEig EEi EgieeEagEIiir EEsiEiiEEEEiSEEa A;eEi;E:iiicEEEESE6. I E e 6 E 6 q o i: 06 il, go o ooJ too o o- ii(, Bo E(, I o- 96, 6' .= o-xo=--, g.E c6 .. o9ECoo tD= OE oo<) o Eo!, Egro l! 8.9 rE 9oEo5tDo- .= oEot!. 9d OEz3 or! t! o EDtr oo B.E la a, .= IEoE= o€odE OE eE E1za oo( g Cct! o ee F.. o Eb O- q; o€ OcN3; 6€ NE 3E 6E a_- oEj-s( 5= a( l)E Jg E d) g oot- N J' o E( 5 c oc f o- st Q x-C: oEaEA6';o + E frg Q o b .-.,. o€ iH 9= o;o: E 5d a E,r 3 Ee*85 B aoE ocv-U,ts o c\l :, 6<@9 tD ll >.: 1r (l)zi EIS QE Y.; c o oY Q 6-6 JJ v; 0) c c) co o6 o- cco co 6o o o g o B o Po> 6E>={ c o6.e E,! fEOc6e5t N< g_ 0r.d =-- .. IfiP= IEB6-6 Pi: E]eEE -oE 5 EEge a+;E SEEE e'Eet Ee,qH :'eEEEoYO () hoao ^ o.c t 6 o 6 El,o ko.Z@x"aE== B='Hi 3.eiz* E =;:d g€E EEEE,3 glE: icEt U E*-= sE35FE F(DcLJ(,TN(v)S 9- (D o B E O -E>h< E c 6 0.) E oEfr . oE e"8 p ffse Ea€eEEg i trl =6 6E > e ;lE iE# Eo.2lo,b c=l- R -El9 6 ! icriiElo.EL 6€ -- il 8E PB eE' q;l€EE=-EE EHsae.E;H:: clr O (Il -c r'= ol(9 E a - EcEEI;: EE= 5 E5N fi=AEiB HgH gfi f; E,F o o o E fo o aoN o iooo G' E tll q 6ti; 2 o 5oo Ei,,, EOoooo)c(ELdo^: rl) o= OCb9 a? d.) Ed) f'o9o:o o!+ OBo' .n o='to o9 U;( E E 6q, tr oro Eoto) o),> 9-a65Eooo) EEaqo, iE a( t): l, GOoo-> o-q N !).i Eruocl,co64 9E;o- tr EE; sH cc 6rtr^caui .". g;5 [t e " EEI6: ! !O IP-o BaEi IiEEE$: IEeE&EBIoC.iYooP l aoe '*;i6E EEEES EEgsgEEE E€E3E: EE E! 55 ,E F 9 AAEEESg EE;EiEEE gEgfiE: T $:dEH:: e iEs58E3E fiEEEEEHiE c EiE EEaEE 6-eqQio€E 3T53.EE;:E ETBE E;EE"1 ao:oFp=!i; ifi:EEEsiE EE€-r*ae;;' E6e.E*'oF;e 5B€:EE{EEIs:-5 E:!;5 EEg[E;EEE siE:*Piq,E €e€:F E5i : EEE-sp5eSEboE oii. Foq66IE> .;EE9tFtEPE:g Be fl€?EE EEE EA'EE iEE E;ffi{ P|+ .6i F E8€ Eif Ps i:E Ei:gEi6< e .Eo; 6aE Ei;PP s 9; *i;;59s: Bl;BF. it99YqaE9iE.= EEcEE: E* iE;EE gi!EEEEE e +s; ;; EE€ EHiE E EEEeiEt*E S iE;E ;;?E+ i1;eEEq!F;.iEE!3!3E1 IEiE€i;EEE: lE.oooEooFo, a; E F o o lE() oJ o o c, I o- Etsoo'EtL tgetOJ 9elt d, .=o-? o- :{ i= so,.g.t E 06 .. o9t=Eoo o=(, Efooo EtooEcL(, PtLJ llloo o o-274 ooo o o O OO O Fra O O O Fr o O O A o O OO F{ oO O Ooi65E555 ; : a -r 6 o !^ .o -r o C| 6 o o L^ !'r sr rn .! rn o r'{ o5 = F'; - 6 F- o cb.{ o = o o.r .r o F sr.! o o o o o o ln o.'r56b -i ; ; ; o .i o = o 6 6 o o 6.!.r o o o o o Q o o oFrms +.n F. 6 + < Or d) m m Ol f"l Oo F\ oo @ sl oo 9 HHEHHHHHHHHHHHftHHHHHHHHHHHHHH o F o zz: oo3-i3(,0r!flEoo ooclLr)Oool(\ E e i(3iz_,=9l:<tl9SBtrv)l^92 EEE= c) rJ] a! lnNO.nFst.oo@ il H .P 8 Rfi EHs EEB=E miEEiIinig3mfrfrfififrff=?ff=. 3'EE*aeEE E aEE i EiSE g aE E E g E 3EE EE E 8 Exbsir:*=E=.,==Ea e? E IIiEEEEiiEcIEEEiH g gH=EE 3EEiEg*F -l F{ '-{ Fl Fl Fr .'l !"1 .l F{ EFOa* E,iHgJ4Et?>1 'r'Q z H 9r* * U5Eg = 6 5E= = z\) 3., EE = g,,ia.g i tri EEEEEEEEEE=EEEEEEEEEgEEEEE giE IJJ IJJ UJ UJ TTJ T! zzzzz_zooooo<oFFFFF-I- L,(,(,193(, lSlflL^>ooooo>oT-FFFFEFt\ u\ vt t^ th \) u1oooooooO(OF-0o(OO\O!-r Fr F{ Fl N st <) a! r-l -l t"{ r'l .{ N oo F oazzzzZzZJJJJ@Jcotitisi-< 9999?9? d.d.d.c.-E-.EU(J(J(J(J()UOFTOOOOAOOsla{Oool/)(nrninrn(nrn.{ Fl !-.1 r-.1 r-l a{ r'{ N 275 Planning Commission Minutes –September 7, 2021 3 drive-thru pick-up window subject to the conditions of approval in the staff report, and adopt the Findings of Fact and Recommendation. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR SUBDIVISION OF TWO PARCELS INTO THREE LOTS AND ONE OUTLOT AND SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR DEVELOPMENT OF AN APPROXIMATELY 82,000-SQUARE FOOT, ONE-STORY OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDING AT 2100 STOUGHTON AVENUE (RIVER VALLEY INDUSTRIAL CENTER) Senior Planner Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item, noting Planning Case 2021-19 is a request for subdivision and site plan approval and the majority of the property is in Chanhassen with the northerly parcel in Chaska. This is zoned and guided for Office-Industrial and will also go before the City of Chaska for approval. As part of the development review, the applicant must provide buffer plantings but the Cities of Chanhassen and Chaska were concerned with the screening of the truck area and are requesting additional landscaping to be installed along the south property line. Erik Henricksen, Project Engineer, shared regarding surrounding right-of-ways, accesses, and noted the only right-of-way Chanhassen has jurisdictional authority over is a portion of Stoughton Avenue that does not abut the development. They would therefore defer any requirements and comments be met that are supplied by Chaska and the County. Things that may be required include ingress and egress configurations, right-of-way improvements, installations of sidewalks and/or traffic control markings, and utilities within the right-of-way. Mr. Generous spoke about proposed architectural materials. Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat and site plan subject to the conditions outlined in the staff report. The site plan is contingent on the applicant getting final plat approval, meeting the requirements of the City of Chaska, and adoption of the Findings of Fact and Recommendation. Commissioner von Oven asked why the City is shaped this way. Mr. Generous thinks the Village of Chanhassen allowed it in the 1960’s. Commissioner Noyes asked if this could be used as retail within these smaller office/warehouse spaces. Mr. Generous stated it is possible in the Industrial Office Park (IOP) zoning, it is allowed to utilize up to 20% of the floor area for display and retail operations. Commissioner Weick thinks the applicant is short 105 trees if he did the math right. He asked if it is reasonable in the area to come up that high on the tree requirements. 276 Planning Commission Minutes –September 7, 2021 4 Mr. Generous stated those are minimum numbers for the City of Chanhassen and noted it is a rather large area. Dan Parks, Civil Engineer with Westwood Professional Services, and Phillip Johnson, Architect, approached the podium, along with Joel Buttenhoff, applicant. They spoke about tree coverage, shrubs, square footage, and the look of the buildings and architecture. Mr. Parks would like the City to consider only having fees charged for the piece that they are developing, and he would like to bring that to the City and staff’s attention. Chairman Weick opened the public hearing. Chairman Weick closed the public hearing. Commissioner Alto moved, Commissioner Johnson seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve 1) Preliminary Plat for River Valley Industrial Center plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services Inc., dated August 3, 2021; 2) Site Plan approval for an 81,660-square foot, one-story office industrial building plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services Inc., dated August 3, 2021 and Phillip Johnson, Architect, dated August 3, 2021, subject to the conditions of staff report and 3) adopt the Findings of Fact and Recommendation. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DATED AUGUST 17, 2021 Commissioner Noyes noted the Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated August 17, 2021, as presented. CITY COUNCIL ACTION UPDATE: Ms. Aanenson said the noise ordinance went before the City Council and was extended to 11:30 p.m. so the brewery will be ready for Octoberfest. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner von Oven moved to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 7:56 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Jean M. Steckling 277 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of Capstone Investors, LLC for Subdivision approval and Site Plan Review. On September 7, 2021,the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly schedule meeting to consider the application of Capstone Investors, LLC for Subdivision approval and Site Plan Review for the property located at 2100 Stoughton Avenue. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed site plan preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Industrial Office Park District, IOP. 2. The property is guided by the Land Use Plan for Office Industrial uses. 3. The legal description of the property is: See Exhibit A 4. Subdivision Findings a. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and meets all of the requirements of the "IOP" Industrial Office Park District; b. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable City, County and regional plans including but not limited to the City's Comprehensive Plan; c. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils,vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and stormwater drainage are suitable for the proposed development; d. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by the subdivision ordinance; e. The proposed subdivision will not cause significant environmental damage subject to compliance with the conditions of approval; f.The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record, but rather will expand and provide all necessary easements; 1 278 g. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: 1) Lack of adequate stormwater drainage. 2) Lack of adequate roads. 3) Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. 4) Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. 5. Site Plan Findings Section 20-110: 1) Is consistent with the elements and objectives of the City's development guides, including the Comprehensive Plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; 2) Is consistent with Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6; 3) Preserves the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing or developing areas; 4) Creates a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; 5) Creates a functional and harmonious design for structures and site features. NA ith special attention to the following: a. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants,visitors and general community; b. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; c. Materials,textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and d. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets,width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. 6) Protects adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. 2 279 6. The planning report#2021-19 dated September 7, 2021, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the preliminary plat and site plan review subject to the conditions of the staff report. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 7th day of September, 2021. CHANHASSE PLANNING COM ISSION BY: Its Chai 3 280 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel 1: That part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3,Township 115,Range 23,Carver County,Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the West line of said Section 3 distant 1795.7 feet due South of the Northwest corner thereof, said point being in the Southeasterly right of way line of the Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad; thence running Northeasterly along said right of way line 997.8 feet;thence running due South parallel with the West line of said Section 3,272.18 feet to a point in the centerline of the industry spur track, said point being the actual point of beginning of the tract of land to be described, said point also being in a curve having a radius of 694.69 feet,the radius point of said curve being South 46 degrees 57 minutes East,694.69 feet from said actual point of beginning; thence running Northeasterly along the centerline of said industry spur track and along the arc of said curve to the right a distance of 89.72 feet to the end of said curve;thence running North 50 degrees 27 minutes East tangent to said curve and along the centerline of said industry spur track 1270.56 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left having a radius of 599.39 feet; thence running Northeasterly along the arc of said curve to the left and along the centerline of said industry spur track, a distance of 307.21 feet to the end of said curve; thence running North 21 degrees 05 minutes East tangent to said curve and along the centerline of said industry spur track, 151.69 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 532.18 feet;thence running Northeasterly along the arc of said curve to the right and along the centerline of said industry spur track 142.42 feet to its intersection with the Southeasterly right of way line of the Minneapolis& St. Louis Railroad, said point being 48.93 feet Southwesterly from the North line of said Section 3 as measured along said Southeasterly right of way line;thence running Northeasterly along said Southeasterly right of way line 48.93 feet to a point in the North line of said Section 3;thence running Fast along said North line 146.4 feet, more or less to the Northwest corner of the parcel of land conveyed to St.John's Evangelical Lutheran Church as recorded in Book 46 Deeds, Page 19, filed August 23, 1950; thence running South at right angles 593.85 feet;thence deflecting 53 degrees 47 minutes to the right and running Southwesterly parallel with the Northerly right of way line of the Chaska and Shakopee Road, 150 feet;thence deflecting 53 degrees 47 minutes to the left and running Southerly 175 feet to a point in the Northerly right of way line of the Chaska and Shakopee Road; thence running Southwesterly along said Northerly right of way line 1676.9 feet,more or less,to a point in a line drawn parallel with the West line of said Section 3 from the actual point of beginning;thence running North along said parallel line 367.62 feet,more or less,to the actual point of beginning. For the purpose of this description the West line of Section 3,Township 115,Range 23 is considered to be a due North and South line. Except that part lying West of the following described Line A: Commencing at a point on the West line of said Northwest Quarter distant 1655.37 feet Southerly from the Northwest corner thereof, said West line has an assumed bearing of South 0 degrees 33 minutes 32 seconds West, said point being on the Northerly line of the Chicago and North Western Railroad Company right of way;thence North 51 degrees 08 minutes 10 seconds Fast along said right of way line 1218.17 feet to the actual point of beginning of Line A to be described;thence South 23 degrees 43 minutes 37 seconds East 8.72 feet; thence Southerly 228.75 feet along a tangential curve 4 281 concave to the West having a radius of 510.00 feet and a central angle of 25 degrees 41 minutes 55 seconds;thence North 88 degrees 01 minutes 42 seconds West and not tangent to said curve 5.00 feet; thence Southerly 96.91 feet along a non-tangential curve concave to the West having a radius of 505.00 feet and a central angle of 10 degrees 59 minutes 41 seconds and a chord bearing of South 07 degrees 28 minutes 09 seconds West;thence South 12 degrees 57 minutes 59 seconds West,tangent to last described curve, 143.07 feet;thence Southerly 330.26 feet along a tangential curve concave to the East having a radius of 420.00 and a central angle of 45 degrees 03 minutes 13 seconds,and there terminating. AND Excepting therefrom the following described tract: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3,Township 115 North,Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian,described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 3; thence on an assumed bearing of South 88 degrees 52 minutes 27 seconds Fast along the north line of said Northwest Quarter a distance of 2286.69 feet;thence South 01 degree 21 minutes 25 seconds West a distance of 195.90 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described;thence South 52 degrees 44 minutes 44 seconds West a distance of 412.15 feet;thence South 34 degrees 48 minutes 12 seconds East to the intersection with the westerly line of the parcel conveyed to Northern States Power Company by the document recorded in Book 61 of Deeds,page 58, in the office of the Carver County Recorder;thence northerly along said westerly line to the northwesterly line of said conveyed parcel; thence northeasterly along said northwesterly line to the intersection with the westerly line of the parcel conveyed to St.John's Evangelical Lutheran Church by the document recorded in Book 46 of Deeds, page 19, in the office of the Carver County Recorder;thence northerly along said west line to the intersection with a line bearing North 52 degrees 44 minutes 44 seconds East from the point of beginning;thence South 52 degrees 44 minutes 44 seconds West to the point of beginning. Abstract Property) Parcel 2: That part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3,Township 115 North.Range 23 West,Carver County, Minnesota,described as follows: Beginning at a point in the West line of said Section 3 distant 1795.7 feet South of the Northwest corner thereof, said point being in the Southeasterly right-of-way line of the Chicago and Northwestern Railroad Company; thence running Northeasterly along said right-of-way line 997.8 feet to a point (which point is the Northwest corner of the tract previously conveyed to American Sugar Company as described in Book 44 of Deeds at Page 8 thereof),which point is the true point of beginning of the tract conveyed; thence running South parallel with the West line of said Section 3, 272.18 feet to a point(which point is the Northwest corner of the tract previously conveyed to M. A. Gedney Company as described in Book 61 of Deeds at Page 251 thereof) in a curve having a radius of 694.69 feet,the radius point of said curve being South 46 degrees 57 minutes East 694.69 feet from said point;thence running Northeasterly along the Northwesterly line of the tract previously conveyed to M. A. Gedney Company as described in Book 61 of Deeds at Page 251 thereof and along the arc 5 282 of said curve to the right a distance of 89.72 feet to the end of said curve; thence running North 50 degrees 27 minutes East tangent to said curve 1270.56 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left having a radius of 599.39 feet;thence running Northeasterly along the arc of said curve to the left a distance of 307.21 feet to the end of said curve; thence running North 21 degrees 05 minutes East tangent to said curve 151.69 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 532.18 feet;thence running Northeasterly along the arc of said curve to the right 142.42 feet to its intersection with the Southeasterly right-of-way line of Chicago and Northwestern Railway Company railroad, said point being 48.93 feet Southwesterly from the North line of said Section 3 as measured along said Southeasterly right-of-way line;thence running Southwesterly along said Southeasterly right-of- way line of Chicago and Northwestern Railway Company railroad to the point of beginning. Except that part lying West of the following described Line A: Commencing at a point on the West line of said Northwest Quarter distant 1655.37 feet Southerly from the Northwest corner thereof, said West line has an assumed bearing of South 0 degrees 33 minutes 32 seconds West, said point being on the Northerly line of the Chicago and North Western Railroad Company right of way;thence North 51 degrees 08 minutes 10 seconds East along said right of way line 1218.17 feet to the actual point of beginning of Line A to be described;thence South 23 degrees 43 minutes 37 seconds East 8.72 feet;thence Southerly 228.75 feet along a tangential curve concave to the West having a radius of 510.00 feet and a central angle of 25 degrees 41 minutes 55 seconds;thence North 88 degrees 01 minutes 42 seconds West and not tangent to said curve 5.00 feet; thence Southerly 96.91 feet along a non-tangential curve concave to the West having a radius of 505.00 feet and a central angle of 10 degrees 59 minutes 41 seconds and a chord bearing of South 07 degrees 28 minutes 09 seconds West;thence South 12 degrees 57 minutes 59 seconds West,tangent to last described curve, 143.07 feet;thence Southerly 330.2 feet along a tangential curve concave to the East having a radius of 420.00 feet and a central angle of 45 degrees 03 minutes 13 seconds,and there terminating. Abstract Property) g:\plan12021 planning cases\21-19 2100 stoughton ave(river valley industrial ctr)\findings of fact river valley industrial center_final.docx 6 283 Fee Name 2021 Rate Quantity (AC)Total SWMP (Lot 1 only*)22,450.00$ 7.89 177,130.50$ Parks (Lot 1 only*)12,500.00$ 7.89 98,625.00$ Building Permit (Sec. 4-30 Fees)See Table 1-A, based on valuation of development) Subdivision Fees (estimate, based on # of recording docs and app fees)1,000.00$ DEVELOPMENT TOTAL 276,755.50$ + Building Permit Fee *If Lot 2 redevelops or subdivides, SWMP and Park fees would be assessed at that time. LOT 1 2020 Rate (future assessments past 2020 unkown, based on 2014 Corridor Study) Future Water Assess 24,705.04$ 7.89 194,922.77$ Future Sanitary Assess 6,612.15$ 7.89 52,169.86$ 2021 Rate MCES SAC 2,560.00$ 20 51,200.00$ assuming 20 SAC, MCES would need to verify City WAC (Water)8,253.00$ 20 165,060.00$ City SAC (Sewer)2,302.00$ 20 46,040.00$ SUBTOTAL 509,392.63$ LOT 2 2020 Rate (future assessments past 2020 unkown, based on 2014 Corridor Study) Future Water Assess 24,705.40$ 13.39 330,805.31$ Future Sanitary Assess 6,612.15$ 13.39 88,536.69$ 2021 Rate MCES SAC 2,560.00$ 20 51,200.00$ assuming 20 SAC, MCES would need to verify City WAC (Water)8,253.00$ 20 165,060.00$ City SAC (Sewer)2,302.00$ 20 46,040.00$ SUBTOTAL 681,641.99$ FUTURE GRAND TOTAL 1,191,034.62$ 284 City Council Item November 22, 2021 Item Fringe Business (BF) District Reclassifying Conditional Uses as Interim Uses Next Steps File No.Item No: L.1 Agenda Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Prepared By MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION N/A Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY BACKGROUND During the October 11, 2021 City Council work session, staff recommended that the City Council consider amending the BF district to reclassify many of the listed conditional uses as interim uses. The goal of this change would be to ensure that parcels in this area have minimal barriers to redeveloping at their highest and best use once sewer and water becomes available. The City Council instructed staff to provide additional information on which parcels would be impacted, what uses are present in the area, and to develop an outreach plan to discuss to proposed amendment with area stakeholders. In response to this direction, staff mailed all property owners with parcels zoned BF an invitation to an open house on November 10th to discuss the proposed changes. DISCUSSION 285 Staff sent out the invitations to the November 10th open house on October 28th. The invitations included a link to the City webpage outlining the proposed changes and encouraged property owners to contact staff with any questions, comments, or concerns. No property owners reached out to staff or attended the open house. The original issue paper memo outlining staff's planned outreach, and associated maps and studies are attached for reference. BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Since none of the property owners have expressed concern with the proposed changes, staff proposes holding a public hearing on December 7, 2021 before the Planning Commission to discuss the proposed changes. The proposed code amendment would appear before the City Council with the Planning Commission's recommendation on January 10, 2022. ATTACHMENTS Next Steps Memo Issue Paper for 10-11-21 CC Land Use Map Zoning Map BF Parcels and Uses Map and Key CR 61 Corridor Study 286 1Y 0..„ rdv N H ASS Chanhassen is a Community for Life-Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner DATE: October 25, 2021 SUBJ: Fringe Business (BF) District Update Background During the October 11, 2021 City Council work session, staff recommended that the City Council consider amending the BF district to reclassify many of the listed conditional uses as interim uses. The goal of this change would be to ensure that parcels in this area have minimal barriers to redeveloping at their highest and best use once sewer and water becomes available. The City Council instructed staff to provide additional information on which parcels would be impacted, what uses are present in the area, and to develop an outreach plan to discuss the proposed amendment with area stakeholders. Impacted Parcels Staff has attached a map along with a spreadsheet showing which parcels are located within the BF district and listing the current use (to the best of staffs knowledge) of each parcel. Of the 18* parcels, 15 are in private ownership. Of those 15, six are smaller parcels, less than one acre in size, currently being used for single-family homes. Of the remaining nine parcels, four are businesses operating under an existing conditional use permit (CUP)or continuing a nonconforming use, four were formally used for a business but are currently not in commercial use, and one parcel is undeveloped. Staff anticipates that the proposed changes would have minimal to no impact on the single-family home owners or current operating businesses, and that it would have the strongest impact on the vacant business sites and undeveloped parcel. Note: The map identifies 16 areas rather than 18;the two parcels labeled collectively as 7 and the two labeled collectively as 8 were formerly a commercial kennel and automotive dealer, respectively. Proposed Outreach In order to inform the property owners of the proposed change and solicit feedback, City staff will contact them by mail to inform them of the proposed change and invite them to an open PH 952.227.1100 • www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us • FX 952.227.1110 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD • PO BOX 147 •CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317 287 house to review the proposed change and long-term plans for the area. Staff will relay the results of this meeting to City Council and assuming the City Council directs staff to move forward with the proposed amendment, staff would subsequently notify all property owners by mail of the date and time of the public hearing. Attachments 1. Map 2. BF Parcels and Uses g:\plan\mw\issue papers and reports(drafts)\bf cu to iu\bf cu to iu next steps.docx 288 CITY OT CHAI'IIIASSII'I Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomonow MEMORANDUM City Council FROM: MacKenzieYoung-Walters,AssociatePlanner DATE: October 11,2021 SUBJ: Fringe Business (BF) District Uses To facilitate the highest and best use of this region, the City may wish to reclassifu certain permitted and conditional uses as interim uses. The City's BF District was initially created 1986 with the stated intent to "accommodate limited commercial uses without urban services" with all potential uses being listed as either conditional or accessory uses. In 1990, the City created interim use permits (lUP) and began classifuing uses that it desired to be temporary in nature as interim uses. In 1994, the City amended the BF District's intent statemenl to state: "The intent of the 'BF' District is to accommodate limited commercial uses temporary in nature without urban services, while maintaining the integrity, minimizing impact, and protecting the natural environment. When urban services are available, land use may change to a higher and improved use ofthe property." Most business uses, with the exception of wholesale nursery/green houses with no retail which is a permitted use, are classified as conditional uses within the District; however, some uses, such as churches and outdoor storage, are classified as interim uses, PH 952.227.1100. www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us. FX 952.227.1110 TO: Issue: This item was discussed at a City Council work session April 23.2018. At that lime, the Council chose not to modifi the District. Now that Highway 101 is nearing completion and properties are for sale along CASH 61, there is more interest in developing. This area is the southem gateway to the City. The uses in the BF District conflict with the land use guiding of properties. By allowing conditional uses that conflict with the City's long-term vision for the area, these may not develop at the highest and best uses. Background: I/OO MARKET BOULEVARD. PO BOX I47. CHANHASSEN' I4INNESOTA 55517 289 City Council Fringe Business (BF) District Uses October 11,2021 Page 2 The City's 2040 Land Use plan guides the parcels currently zoned BF for office industrial, mixed use, residential medium density, and residential high density land uses. The Highway 101/61 study commissioned by the City in 2014 envisions many ofthese parcels as being part ofthe City's southem gateway. As the reconstruction of Flying Cloud Drive and Highway 101 nears completion, the City has begun receiving inquires about the possibility of reactivating, expanding, and/or repurposing existing businesses along Flying Cloud Drive. While any business may continue to operate under the terms ofexisting conditional use permits in perpetuity, the City is concemed that applications for new or expanded conditional use permits (CUP) may come in. Since the express intent ofthe District is to accommodate temporary commercial uses until urban services are extended, it may be appropriate to classiff the area's allowed commercial uses as interim rather than conditional uses. Doing so will help to convey the City's expectation that these uses will be discontinued and the parcels redeveloped once municipal services are extended, and will also provide the City with an additional tool to help insure that the area develops at the highest and best use. Analvsis: Conditional use permits govem uses which are generally not allowed in a district, but may be suitable in specific circumstances. The City classifies uses that have a high potential to substantially impact adjacent parcels as conditional uses. Applicants wishing to receive a CUP must demonstrate that the use will not unduly impact adjacent parcels or the community and that it will be consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and zoning ordinance. The City's Zoning Code lists general and specific requirements for most conditional uses. Ifan applicant can demonstrate that they meet all ofthe conditional use requirements, the City must issue a CUP; however, the City can place reasonable andjustifiable conditions on the permit in order to mitigate anticipated adverse impacts associated with proposed use. This permit is recorded against property and allows that use to continue in perpetuity so long as the conditions of approval are not violated, the property is not subdivided, and the use is not discontinued for a period of six months or longer. Relevant Citv Code: Chapter 20 - Zoning, Article IV. - Conditional Uses: This article details general criteria, conditions, and procedures for granting and revoking CUPs and IUPs. Other divisions address specific criteria for various conditional uses by district. Chapter 20 - Zoning, Article ){X. - "BF" Fringe Business District, Sec. 20-771, -773, and -775: These sections respectively list the Districts permiued, conditional, and interim uses. Issue 1 : Conditional Use Permits (CUP) v. Interim Use Permits (lUP) 290 City Council Fringe Business (BF) District Uses October 11,2021 Page 3 Interim use permits (IUP) are very similar to conditional use permits, with the applicant needing to demonstrate that they meet the zoning ordinances requirement for the use and the City having the authority to impose conditions necessary to mitigate the anticipated impact ofthe use' The key difference is that interim uses are uses that the City believes are currently appropriate for an area but will not be suitable in future. In otder to ensure that these uses are temporary, the City Code requires that an IUP has an identified date or event that will terminate the use and also stipulates that the use will terminate upon any change in the City's zoning regulations which renders the use nonconforming. IUPs can also be terminated for the same reasons as CUPs. Uses should be classified as conditional when they represent an activity that will remain suitable as an area develops. For example, drive-through facilities are conditional uses due to their potential traffic impacts and presence ofan on-site speaker/intercom system; however, once it is demonstrated that these concerns have been mitigated, it is not envisioned that changes to the surrounding parcels will make the drive-tkough an unsuitable use. Uses should be classified as interim when they represent an activity that will become unsuitable as an area develops. For example, commercial kennels and stables are classified as interim uses in Agricultural Estate (A2) Districts because while their impacts can be mitigated within the context of multi-acre residential lots, these impacts are much less mitigatable within the context of a residential subdivision with 15,000-square foot lots. Automotiye Dealer/Rentals: Reclassifo from conditional use to interim use. There is a valid CUP for this use within this district. While this use is suitable within the area's current context, it would not be desirable in the context of mixed residential and commercial uses and high density residential districts. Commercial Kennels: Reclassifu from conditional use to interim use. There is a valid CUP for this use within this district. While this use is suitable within the area's current context, it would not be desirable in the context of mixed residential and commercial uses and high density residential districts. Commercial Sta6les: Reclassifu from conditional use to interim use. Reclassifr from conditional use to interim use. There is a valid CUP for this use within this district. While this use is suitable within the area's current context, it would not be desirable in the context of mixed residential and commercial uses and high density residential districts. Issue 2: Proposed Chanees lI/holesale Nursery/Green House/No Rerail: Reclassiff from permitted use to interim use. Currently no parcel zoned BF is being used as wholesale nursery/green house. While this use is suitable within the area's current context, it would not be desirable in the context of mixed residential and commercial uses and high density residential districts. This use is already listed as interim use in the nearby A2 districts. 291 City Council Fringe Business (BF) District Uses October 11,2021 Page 4 Iharehousing and Cold Storage: Reclassify from conditional use to interim use. There is a valid CUP for this use within this District. While this use is suitable within the area's current context, it would not be desirable in the context of mixed residential and commercial uses and high density residential districts. Motor Fuel Station without Car ll/ash: Reclassifu from conditional use to interim use. There is a valid CUP for this use within this district. While this use is suitable within the area's current context, it would not be desirable in the context of mixed residential and commercial uses and high density residential districts. Miniature Golf Course: Reclassifr from conditional use to interim use. There is a valid CUP for this use within this district. While this use is suitable within the area's current context, it would not be desirable in the context of mixed residential and commercial uses and high density residential districts. Recommendation: Staffrecommends reclassifring commercial uses within the BF District as interim uses and correct the codification enor. This will better convey the City's intent that these uses are temporary in nature, and will allow the City to terminate IUPs upon rezoning. ARTICLE XX..'BF" FRINGE BUSINESS DISTRICT Sec.20-771. - Intent. The intent of the "BF" district is to accommodate limiled commercial uses temporary in nature without urban services, while maintaining the integrity, minimizing impact, and protecting the natural environment. When urban services are available, land use may change to a higher and improved use of the property. (Ord. No. 80, tut. V, $ l4(5-14-l), I2-15-86; Ord. No. 220, $ l, 9-12-94) Sec.20-771.1. - Permitted uses. The following are permitted uses in a "BF" district: ( I ) Agriculture. (2) Antennas as regulated by Article XXX ofthis chapter. (3) Private and public park/open space. (4) Single-family dwelling (one unit per ten acres). 292 City Council Fringe Business (BF) District Uses October 11,2021 Page 5 (Ord. No. 220, S 1,9-12-94; Ord. No. 259, $ 23,11-12-96; Ord. No. 377, $ 103, 5-24-04) Sec. 20-772. - Permitted accessory uses. The following are permitted accessory uses in a "BF" district: (l) Parking lots. (2) Signs. (3) Temporary outdoor sales and events (subject to the requirements of section 20-964). (Ord. No.80, ArL V, $ l4(5-14-3), l2-15-86; Ord. No.243, $ 11,2-13-95; Ord.No.377,5104, 5-24-04; Ord. No.619, $ 12,2-27-17) Sec. 20-773. - Conditional uses. The following are conditional uses in a "BF" district: @ @ine €)---eemraereial+en*ets $)---eemmercial+ta*s" (7) Towers as regulated by article )O(X ofthis chapter (8) Utility services. (Ord. No. 80, tut. V, $ 14(5-14-2), 12-15-86; Ord. No. 80-D, $ 1, 1-11-88; Ord. No. 103, $ 1,5- 22-89; Ord. No. I 16, S 9, l-22-90; Ord. No. 120, $ 4(1 l), 2-12-90; Ord. No. 220, $ 2,9-12-94; Ord. No. 247,$ l,3-11-96; Ord. No. 259,524,11-12-96; Ord. No. 377, $ 105, 5-24-04) State Law reference- Conditional uses, M.S. $ 462.3595.5 Sec.20-774. - Lot requirements and setbacks. The following minimum requirements shall be observed in a "BF" district subject to additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in this chapter: (1) The minimum lot area is 20,000 square feet. (2) The minimum lot frontage is 100 feet, except that lots fronting on a cul-de-sac shall have a minimum front footage of 60 feet in all districts. 293 City Council Fringe Business (BF) District Uses October 11,2021 Page 6 (3) (4) (s) The minimum lot depth is 150 feet. The maximum lot coverage is 40 percent. Off-street parking shall comply with district setback requirements except: a. There is no minimum setback when it abuts a railroad right-of-way, except as provided in chapter 20, article XXV, division 3, pertaining to landscaping requirements. b. There is no minimum setback when it abuts, without being separated by a street, another off-sEeet Parking area. c. The minimum setback is 50 feet when it abuts a residential district without being separated from the residential district by a street or railroad right-of-way. d. The minimum setback is 25 feet for side sheet side yards. e. Parking setbacks along public rights-of-way may be reduced to a minimum often feet if the applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction ofthe city that l00-percent screening is provided at least five feet above the adjacent parking lot. The intent of this section is that the city is willing to trade a reduced setback for additional landscaping that is both an effective screen and ofhigh quality aesthetically. Acceptable screening is to be comprised of berming and landscaping. Screening through the use offencing is not permitted. The maximum height is as follows: a. For the principal structure, one story. b. For accessory structures, one story. Minimum setback requirements: a. For front yards,25 feet. b. For rear yards, 20 feet. c. For side yards, ten feet. d. The minimum setback is 50 feet when it abuts a residential district without being separated from the residential district by a street or railroad right-of-way' e. Buffer yards. The City Comprehensive Plan establishes a requirement for buffer yards. Buffer yards are to be established in areas indicated on the plan where higher intensity uses interface with low density uses and shall comply with chapter 20, article XXV, of the Chanhassen City Code. The buffer yard is not an additional setback requirement. The full obligation to provide the buffer yard shall be placed on the parcel containing the higher intensity use. (6) (7) 294 City Council Fringe Business (BF) District Uses October 11,2021 Page 1 The buffer yard is intended to provide physical separation and screening for the higher intensity use. As such, they will be required to be provided with a combination of berming, landscaping and/or tree preservation to maximize the buffering potential. To the extent deemed feasible by the city, new plantings shall be designed to require the minimum of maintenance, however, such maintenance as may be required to maintain consistency with the approved plan, shall be the obligation of the property owner. (Ord. No. 80, ArL V, $ 14(15-144), 12-15-86; Ord. No. 94, $$ 1,5,7-25-88; Ord. No. 136, $$ 1A, lB, l-28-91; Ord. No.45l, $ 6, 5-29-07; Ord. No.474, $ 13, l0-13-08) Sec. 20-775. - Interim uses. The following are interim uses in the "BF" district: (l) Churches. (2) Outdoor storage. (3) Rese*e*Automotivedealers/rental. (4) Commercialkennels. (5) Commercialstables. (6) Wholesale nursery/green house/no retail (subject to compliance with section 20- 268\. (7) Cold storage and warehousing. (8) Miniature golf course (pursuant to section 20-259). (9) Motor fuel stations without car washes. (Ord. No. 120, $ 3, 2-12-90; Ord. No. 164, $ l, 2-24-92; Ord. No. 243,5 12,2-13-95; Ord. No. 377, $ 106, 5-24-04) Secs. 20-77 6---20-790. - Reserved. Attachments: 1. Zoning Map 2. Lard Use Map 3. Highway 101/61 Map g:\plan\mw\issue papers and repons (drafu)U-shelved\bf cu to iu\bfcu to iu issue paper.docx 295 2040 Land Use 296 Zoning Map 297 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 298 Map # PID Address Owner Mailing Address Current Use 2040 Land Use1 250340111 1900 Stoughton TKG III Chaska LLC215 N Stadium Blvd, STE 207 Columbia, MO 65205Warehousing/Outdoor Storage (CUP/IUP) Office Industrial2 250030600 1930 Stoughton Ave Richard Wermerskirchen1930 Stoughton Ave, Chaska, MN 55318Single Family Res. (Permited) Office Industrial3 250030400 1910 Stoughton Ave Dale Schultz1910 Stoughton Ave, Chaska, MN 55318Single Family Res. (Permited) Office Industrial4 250340300 1805 Stoughton Ave Carlton Solberg 1805 Stoughton Ave, Chaska, MN Single Family Res. (Permited) Office Industrial5 250351310 None State of MN‐DNR*500 Lafayette RD, St Paul, MN 55155Open Space Mixed6 250351300 780 Flying Cloud Drive Skip S. Cook15506 Village Woods Drive, Eden Prairie, MN 55347Motel (Legal Non‐Conformity) Mixed7 256010010 10500 Great Plains Blvd PCH Development LLCPO Box 94 Shakoppe, MN 55379 Vacant (Formerly Commerical Kennel CUP)Mixed7 256010020 10520 Great Plains Blvd PCH Development LLCPO Box 94 Shakoppe, MN 55379 Vacant (Formerly Commerical Kennel CUP)Mixed8 250362700 None Larry Hopfenspirger2720 Quaker Ln N, Plymouth, MN 55441Automotive dealers CUPAgriculture8 250363700 615 Flying Cloud Drive 615 Flying Cloud Drive LLC2025 Nicollet Ave #203 Minneapolis, MN 55404Automotive dealers (CUP)Park and Open Space9 250361300 608 Flying Cloud Drive 608 Flying Cloud LLC608 Flying Cloud Drive, Chaska, MN 55318Automotive dealers (CUP) Residential High Density10 257980010 550 Flying Cloud Drive P R Kelly Properties LLC13991 Kensington Ave NE, Prior Lake, MN 55372Warehousing/Outdoor Storage (CUP) Residential High Density11 250361000 None State of MN‐DNR**500 Lafayette RD, St Paul, MN 55155Open Space Residential High Density12 250362800 470 Flying Cloud Drive Michael Spiess470 Flying Cloud Drive, Chaska, MN 55318Single Family Res. (Permited) Residential High Density13 250363100 460 Flying Cloud Drive Alvin Lebens460 Flying Cloud Drive, Chaska, MN 55318Single Family Res. (Permited) Residential High Density14 250360710 450 Flying Colud Drive Daniel Thiessen450 Flying Cloud Drive, Chaska, MN 55318Single Family Res. (Permited) Residential High Density15 250360700 220 Flying Cloud Drive Beatrice I Zwiers IRREV TRUST11111 Deuce Rd, Elko, MN 55020Open Space Residential High Density16 250360500 None City of ChanhassenPO Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317Open Space Residential High Density***List of Properties Zoned Fringe Business DistrictLower rectanglear portion will be County ROW, upper trinagle section will likely go to City.Is now County ROW, GIS is has not yet been updated to reflect that.299 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 14, 2014 July 14, 2014City Council Work Session 300 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 14, 2014 »Inform and seek guidance on utility service scenarios PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION 1 301 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 14, 2014 »Develop guidance for future land use o with city services scenario o without city services scenario »Incorporate land use guidance into next Comprehensive Plan update STUDY PURPOSE AND INTENT 2 302 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 14, 2014 PROJECT SCHEDULE/PROCESS »OPEN HOUSE II: August 6, 2014 4-6 pm 3 303 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 14, 2014 PROJECT AREA 4 304 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 14, 2014 RELATED STUDIES UTILITY SERVICE STUDY HIGHWAY 101 BRIDGE RECONSTRUCTION COUNTY ROAD 61 RECONSTRUCTION 5 305 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 14, 2014 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE 15 306 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 14, 2014 2030 SEWER DISTRICT + SUBDISTRICTS 16 307 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 14, 2014 WASTE WATER FLOW CONVEYANCE RECOMMENDATION 17 308 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 14, 2014 WATER SERVICE DEVELOPMENT 18 309 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 14, 2014 CITY SERVICE CONSIDERATIONS »Timing/Phasing »Land Use/Density »Cost and Financing 19 310 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 14, 2014 CURRENT LAND USE GUIDING 20 311 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 14, 2014 CURRENT ZONING 21 312 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 14, 2014 DEVELOPMENT AREA CONSTRAINTS »Steep Slopes »Park/Open Space »Water Features •Wetlands/Fen •Creeks/Rivers •Lake 22 313 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 14, 2014 POTENTIAL LAND USES: CITY SERVICES PROVIDED Option A 23 314 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 14, 2014 POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS (with city services) 1. ASSUMPTION CREEK AREA 2. GATEWAY AREA 3. MOON VALLEY AREA 24 315 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 14, 2014 ASSUMPTION CREEK: AREA 1 HKGI graphic –Assumption Creek Area 25 316 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 14, 2014 ASSUMPTION CREEK: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL CONCEPT HKGI graphic –Assumption Creek Area 26 317 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 14, 2014 ASSUMPTION CREEK: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL YIELD HKGI graphic –Assumption Creek Area 27 318 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 14, 2014 ASSUMPTION CREEK: DENSITY TRANSFER CONCEPT HKGI graphic –Assumption Creek Area 28 319 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 14, 2014 ASSUMPTION CREEK: DENSITY TRANSFER -TOWNHOUSES HKGI graphic –Assumption Creek Area 29 320 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 14, 2014 GATEWAY: AREA 2 HKGI graphic –Assumption Creek Area 30 321 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 14, 2014 GATEWAY: MIXED-USE COMMERCIAL CONCEPT HKGI graphic –Assumption Creek Area 31 322 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 14, 2014 GATEWAY: MIXED-USE COMMERCIAL YIELD HKGI graphic –Assumption Creek Area 32 323 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 14, 2014 MOON VALLEY: AREA 3 HKGI graphic –Assumption Creek Area 33 324 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 14, 2014 MOON VALLEY: HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL CONCEPT HKGI graphic –Assumption Creek Area 34 325 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 14, 2014 MOON VALLEY: HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL YIELD HKGI graphic –Assumption Creek Area 35 326 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 14, 2014 MOON VALLEY: SENIOR HOUSING CONCEPT HKGI graphic –Assumption Creek Area 36 327 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 14, 2014 MOON VALLEY: SENIOR HOUSING YIELD HKGI graphic –Assumption Creek Area 37 328 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 14, 2014 POTENTIAL UTILITY ASSESSMENTS City of Chanhassen Estimated Project Costs from SEH CR 61 Corridor Study Comparison to Hook-up Fee Revenue 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Project Cost $9,868,000 $10,262,720 $10,673,229 $11,100,158 $11,544,164 $12,005,931 $12,486,168 Inflation Rate 4%4%4%4%4%4%4% (Note: SEH assumed a 3.5% inflation rate on construction costs. Rate study used 4%.) NPV of Water Connection Fees $4,941,008 NPV of Sewer Connection Fees $1,322,479 Total $6,263,487 % of Project Costs in 2020 50% *Assessing $6,263,487 of project costs divided by 200 acres of developable land = $31,317 in assessments per acre *It should be noted that this work could not occur until Bluff Creek Golf Course develops and Highway 101 going up the bluff is constructed. 38 329 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 14, 2014 »Realignment of Highway 101 (North of County Rd 61) »Development timing and phasing »Parcel assembly »Property owners desires/long-term intent VARIABLES THAT AFFECT LAND USE TRANSITION 39 330 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 14, 2014 POTENTIAL LAND USES: CITY SERVICES NOT PROVIDED Option B 40 331 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 14, 2014 CITY VISION With the last update of the comprehensive plan, there was a great deal of consideration of the opportunity Chanhassen has as a regional draw. This appeal includes cultural, retail and employment opportunities. We learned through the “Retail Market Analysis” that the city has a strong north -south connection. In the past the perception was the east -west was predominant economic connection. The completion of the 101 Bridge will further enhance this north – south connection. In addition the upgrade of the County Road 61 will provide opportunities to further capitalize on the regional draw. The city has the opportunity to assess their vision by reviewing land use recommendations and evaluating the development opportunities and constraints. 41 332 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 14, 2014 »Utility Service Approach »Land Use Approach »Incorporate Recommendations into Comprehensive Plan Update »Community Engagement –August 6, 2014 NEXT STEPS FOR DECISION MAKING 42 333 City Council Item November 22, 2021 Item Consider Letters of Intent to Purchase City Owned Property Located on Lot 1, Block 2, Gateway East 2nd Addition, PID 25-3010020 File No.Item No: M.1 Agenda Section CLOSED SESSION Prepared By Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION Consider Letters of Intent Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY The meeting will be closed as permitted by section 13D.03 to discuss offers received for city owned property located at 195 West 79th Street. The proceedings of the meeting will be tape recorded as required by law. The recording will be preserved for eight years after the date of the meeting and made available to the public after all real or personal property discussed at the meeting has been purchased or sold or the governing body has abandoned the purchase or sale. A list of members and all other persons present at the closed meeting will be made available to the public after the closed meeting. BACKGROUND DISCUSSION 334 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 195 West 79th Street Overview 335 FOR SALE 195 West 79th Street Chanhassen, MN 55317 Lot 2, Block 1, Gateway East 2nd Addition PID: 25-3010020 Zoning: Highway And Business Services District 336 INDEX 1. Site Data 2. Plat 3. Contact Information 4. City Code, Chapter 20, Article XVII. - "BH" Highway and Business Services District 5. Off Premise Directional Sign 6. Staff Report dated November 17, 2015 7. Geotechnical Exploration Report 337 1. Site Data PRESENT ZONING: Highway and Business Services District, BH 2030 LAND USE PLAN: Commercial ACREAGE: 1.29 Acres LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 2, Block 1, Gateway East 2nd Addition PID: 25-3010020 PERMITTED USES: See Attachment #4. 338 2. PLAT 339 340 3. Contact Information City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 CONTACT: Chelsea Petersen, Assistant City Manager CITY OF CHANHASSEN PH. 952.227.1118 Email: cpetersen@ci.Chanhassen.mn.us www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us 341 4. Zoning Ordinance CITY CODE CHAPTER 20, ZONING ORDINANCE ARTICLE XVII. - "BH" HIGHWAY AND BUSINESS SERVICES DISTRICT Sec. 20-711. - Intent. The intent of the "BH" district is to provide for highway oriented commercial development restricted to a low building profile. Sec. 20-712. - Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted in a "BH" district: (1) Antennas as regulated by article XXX of this chapter. (2) Car wash. (3) Community center. (4) Convenience stores without gas pumps. (5) Day care center. (6) Fast-food restaurant. (7) Financial institutions. (8) Funeral homes. (9) Health services. (10) Liquor stores. (11) Miniature golf. (12) Motels and hotels. (13) Offices. (14) Personal services. (15) Private clubs and lodges. (16) Reserved. (17) Shopping center. (18) Specialty retail shops. (19) Standard restaurants. (20) Utility services. (21) Adult day care, subject to the requirements of section 20-966. Sec. 20-713. - Permitted accessory uses. The following are permitted accessory uses in a "BH" district: (1) Signs. (2) Parking lots. (3) Temporary outdoor sales and events (subject to the requirements of section 20-964). Sec. 20-714. - Conditional uses. The following are conditional uses in a "BH" district: (1) Automobile rental facilities. (2) Automotive repair shops. (3) Convenience stores with gas pumps. (4) Drive-through facilities. (5) Emission control testing stations. (6) Garden centers. (7) Motor fuel stations. 342 (8) Outdoor storage. (9) Reserved. (10) Small vehicle sales. (11) Supermarkets. (12) Towers as regulated by article XXX of this chapter. Sec. 20-715. - Lot requirements and setbacks. The following minimum requirements shall be observed in a "BH" district subject to additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in this chapter: (1) The minimum district area is ten acres. This section may be waived by a condition use permit in the case of expansion of an existing district. (2) The minimum lot area is 20,000 square feet. (3) The minimum lot frontage is 100 feet, except that lots fronting on a cul-de-sac shall have a minimum frontage in all districts of 60 feet. (4) The minimum lot depth is 150 feet. (5) The maximum lot coverage is 65 percent. (6) Off-street parking shall comply with district setback requirements except: a. There is no minimum setback when it abuts a railroad right-of-way, except as provided in chapter 20, article XXV, division 3, pertaining to landscaping requirements. b. There is no minimum setback when it abuts, without being separated by a street, another off- street parking area. c. The minimum setback is 50 feet when it abuts a residential district without being separated from the residential district by a street or railroad right-of-way. d. The minimum setback is 25 feet for side street side yards. e. Parking setbacks along public rights-of-way may be reduced to a minimum of ten feet if the applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the city that 100 percent screening is provided at least five feet above the adjacent parking lot. The intent of this section is that the city is willing to trade a reduced setback for additional landscaping that is both an effective screen and of high quality aesthetically. Acceptable screening is to be comprised of berming and landscaping. Screening through the use of fencing is not permitted. (7) The maximum height is as follows: a. For the principal structure, two stories. b. For accessory structures, one story. (8) Minimum setback requirements: a. For front yards, 25 feet. b. For rear yards, 20 feet. c. For side yards, ten feet. d. The minimum setback is 50 feet when it abuts a residential district without being separated from the residential district by a street or railroad right-of-way. e. Buffer yards. 1. The city comprehensive plan establishes a requirement for buffer yards. Buffer yards are to be established in areas indicated on the plan where higher intensity uses interface with low density uses and shall comply with chapter 20, article XXV, of the Chanhassen City Code. 2. The buffer yard is not an additional setback requirement. The full obligation to provide the buffer yard shall be placed on the parcel containing the higher intensity use. 3. The buffer yard is intended to provide physical separation and screening for the higher intensity use. As such, they will be required to be provided with a combination of berming, landscaping and/or tree preservation to maximize the buffering potential. To the extent deemed feasible by the city, new plantings shall be designed to require the minimum of maintenance, however, such maintenance as may be required to maintain consistency with the approved plan, shall be the obligation of the property owner. 343 Sec. 20-716. - Interim uses. The following are interim uses in the "BH" district: (1) Churches. (2) Reserved. (3) Farmers markets. 344 5. Off-Premise Directional Sign Such signs are allowed only in situations where access is confusing and traffic safety could be jeopardized or traffic could be inappropriately routed through residential streets. The size of the sign shall be no larger than what is needed to effectively view the sign from the roadway and shall be approved by the city council. Staff is proposing the following criteria for the off-premise directional sign: 1. The sign shall not exceed 8 feet in height. 2. The sign area shall not exceed 32 square feet. 3. The sign shall be located outside of the sight triangle and shall not interfere with the driver’s intersection sight distance. 4. The sign shall maintain a minimum of 10 feet from the back of the curb. 5. The sign shall maintain a 1.5-foot separation from the trail. 6. The sign shall not be illuminated. 7. The sign shall not interfere with snow removal operations. 8. The sign lettering shall not exceed 6 inches and have a uniform style. 9. The sign shall only include the names and logos of the businesses and a directional arrow. 10. The sign design shall compliment the design and materials of the proposed building. 11. The sign shall not obstruct driver’s views of any city-owned street signage or railroad signage. 12. The sign will be owned and maintained by the City. 13. The applicant shall construct the sign. Staff will work with the applicant to finalize the design of the directional sign. Approximate sign location 345 6. Staff Report dated November 17, 2015 346 CITY OF CHANHASSEN PROPOSED MOTION: PC DATE: 11/17/2015 CC DATE: 11/23/2015 REVIEW DEADLINE: 12/15/2015 CASE #: 2015-21 BY: Al-Jaff, et al. The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve Site Plan Review for the construction of a 4,300 square -foot medical office building on 1.29 acres of property zoned Highway and Business Services District (BH), an off -premise directional sign; and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation." SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Plan Review for the construction of 4,300 square -foot medical office building and an off -premise directional sign. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within the required 500 feet. Staff is recommending approval of the request with conditions. LOCATION: 195 West 79a' Street (Lot 2, Block 1, Gateway East 2nd Addition) APPLICANT: Randy Schold OWNER: City of Chanhassen 8925 Twin Lakes Crossing 7700 Market Boulevard Eden Prairie, MN 55347 Chanhassen, MN 55317 rschold@metroplains.com 651-523-1244 PRESENT ZONING: Highway and Business Services District, BH 2030 LAND USE PLAN: Commercial ACREAGE: 1.29 Acres DENSITY: NA LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the City must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City's discretion in approving or denying an off -premise directional sign plan is limited to whether or not access is confusing. This is a quasi-judicial decision. PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The request consists of a site plan application for the construction of a 4,300 square -foot medical building and an off -premise directional sign to be located at the northeast intersection of West 79a` Street and Great Plains Boulevard. The site has an area of 1.29 acres, zoned Highway and Business Services District, BH, and is located east of West 79' Street, north of Highway 5, west of Highway 101 and south of Twin Cities and Western Railroad. Access to the site is gained via West 79d' Street. 347 Planning Commission Gateway Medical Building — Planning Case 2014-21 November 17, 2015 Page 2 of 21 This type of facility is permitted in the Highway Business District. Sewer and water are available to the site. The 4,300 square -foot building is proposed to be situated along the southwest corner of the site with a potential future building east of the current proposed building. The total permitted site coverage in the BH district is 65 percent. The proposed development has a total hard coverage area of 26%. The design of the building is attractive and is proposed to be constructed of high-quality materials. They include light and dark aggregate block, rough -face block, galvanized metal trellises, glass windows and a cable system to guide vines as they grow. The roof design is in a wide "V" shape which lends an interest to the design of the building and will act as screening for the rooftop equipment. The building elevations are highly articulated with many horizontal and vertical recesses and projections in the building fagade. Parking is buffered from views by landscaping and the building. 348 Planning Commission Gateway Medical Building — Planning Case 2014-21 November 17, 2015 Page 3 of 21 The directional off -premise sign is proposed to be located at the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard and West 791h Street. Access to this site is confusing with multiple access points off of Great Plains Boulevard. Staff is recommending approval of the directional sign. Staff regards the project as a well-designed development. The overall design is sensitive to the surrounding area. Based upon the foregoing, staff is recommending approval of the site plan and directional sign with conditions as outlined in the staff report (the off -premise directional sign requires city council approval only). APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6, Site Plan Review Chapter 20, Article XVII, `BH" Highway and Business Services District Chapter 20, Article XXIII, Division 7, Design Standards for Commercial, Industrial and Office - Institutional Developments Sec. 20-1255. — Signs allowed without permit. (2) Directional signs. b. BACKGROUND The site was previously owned by Apple Valley Red -E -Mix. In 1992, the City initiated the condemnation of the former Apple Valley Red -E -Mix parcel. hi October 1993, Apple Valley Red - E -Mix vacated the property. In June 1995, the City finalized the purchase of the site. On April 4, 1983, the City approved a non -conforming use permit, a conditional use permit (#82- 4) and a variance to permit a washout system at the Apple Valley Red -E -Mix site. The eastern end of the site was previously owned and used for a Taco Shop. In October 1991, the City initiated the condemnation of the Taco Shop parcel in conjunction with the realignment of the intersection of Highway 101 and West 78d' Street. On May 21, 1993, the City finalized the acquisition of the parcel. The pedestrian bridge was constructed over Highway 5 in 1995. On April 25, 2005, the Chanhassen City Council approved a Land Use Amendment from Parks and Open Space to Commercial, Preliminary plat for Gateway East 2nd Addition creating two lots and one outlot, and Site Plan Review for a 12,500 square -foot building for a water treatment plant and an 8,100 square -foot backwash tank on Lot 1, Block 1, Gateway East 2nd Addition. On May 23, 2005, the Chanhassen City Council approved the final plat for Gateway East 2nd Addition creating two lots and one outlot. 349 Planning Commission Gateway Medical Building — Planning Case 2014-21 November 17, 2015 Page 4 of 21 SITE PLAN The applicant is requesting site plan approval for the construction of a 4,300 square -foot medical office building on 1.29 acres of property zoned Highway and Business Services District (BH). The one-story building is proposed to occupy the southwest portion of the site. Parking is proposed along the northwest corner of the site and will be screened by the building and landscaping. Site coverage may not exceed 65 percent. The total hard surface coverage proposed on the site is 26%. City code requires the development to have an attractive design and use durable materials. The design of the building is attractive and is proposed to be constructed of high-quality materials that are complementary to surrounding buildings. They include a variation of 1 light and dark aggregate block, rough face block, galvanized metal trellises, glass windows and a cable system to guide vines as they grow. The roof design is in a wide "V" shape which lends an interest to the design of the building and will act as screening for the rooftop equipment. The building elevations are highly articulated with many horizontal and vertical recesses and projections in the building frgade. All elevations have received equal attention. The trash enclosure for the building is located north of the parking lot and is hidden from views. The materials used on the trash enclosure must be the same material as the building. 350 Planning Commission Gateway Medical Building — Planning Case 2014-21 November 17, 2015 Page 5 of 21 Staff regards the project as a well-designed development. The overall design is sensitive to the surrounding area. Based upon the foregoing, staff is recommending approval of the site plan with conditions as outlined in the staff report. The applicant has submitted a lighting plan and a photometrics plan has been prepared for the site. Light levels for site lighting shall be no more than one-half foot candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. All fixtures must be shielded. SIGNAGE The applicant is proposing one ground low -profile business sign along Highway 5. The sign ordinance permits one ground low -profile business sign per each outlet or separate building pad that has street frontage. The height of the sign shall not exceed 8 feet and square footage of the sign shall not exceed 64 square feet. Such signs shall be located at least 300 feet from any other pylon or ground sign on the parcel and at least 10 feet from any property line. The applicant is also proposing an electronic message center along the upper portion of the monument sign. This use is permitted under the sign ordinance. The final sign request is for an off -premise sign. Such signs are allowed only in situations where access is confusing and traffic safety could be jeopardized or traffic could be inappropriately routed through residential streets. The size of the sign shall be no larger than what is needed to effectively view the sign from the roadway and shall be approved by the city council. Staff is proposing the following criteria for the off - premise directional sign: LED SIGNAGE WITH CURRENT ANNOUNCEMENTS o@(9 Chgnhl$ssen, LLC METAL STAND OFF LETTERING 1. The sign shall not exceed 8 feet in height. 2. The sign area shall not exceed 32 square feet. 3. The sign shall be located outside of the sight triangle and shall not interfere with the driver's intersection sight distance. 4. The sign shall maintain a minimum of 10 feet from the back of the curb. 351 Planning Commission Gateway Medical Building — Planning Case 2014-21 November 17, 2015 Page 6 of 21 5. The sign shall maintain a 1.5 -foot separation from the trail. 6. The sign shall not be illuminated. 7. The sign shall not interfere with snow removal operations. 8. The sign lettering shall not exceed 6 inches and have a uniform style. 9. The sign shall only include the names and logos of the businesses and a directional arrow. 10. The sign design shall compliment the design and materials of the proposed building. 11. The sign shall not obstruct driver's views of any city -owned street signage or railroad signage. 12. The sign will be owned and maintained by the City. 13. The applicant shall construct the sign. Staff will work with the applicant to finalize the design of the directional sign. PARKING The ordinance requires one parking space per 150 square feet of medical/clinical office space. The number of spaces required is 26 parking spaces. The applicant is providing 31 parking spaces. GENERAL SITE PLAN/ARCHITECTURE ARCHITECTURAL COMPLIANCE Size Portion Placement The building entrance is located off West 791h Street. The building entrance is articulated with glass and a galvanized metal trellis. 352 Planning Commission Gateway Medical Building — Planning Case 2014-21 November 17, 2015 Page 7 of 21 The site is very well laid out with the building as the main focus while the parking is screened from views. The architectural style complements the design of the water treatment plant building and the pedestrian bridge. Material and Detail Building materials consist of high-quality materials including a light and dark aggregate block, rough -face block, galvanized metal trellises, glass windows and a cable system to guide vines as they grow. The building elevations are highly articulated with many horizontal and vertical recesses and projections in the building fagade. Height and Roof Design Building height is one story at 16 feet. Pitched roof element is in the shape of a wide "V". This design complements the surrounding area as it mimics the design of the water treatment plant and acts as rooftop screening. Height is limited to two stories in the BH zoning district. 353 Planning Commission Gateway Medical Building — Planning Case 2014-21 November 17, 2015 Page 8 of 21 Facade Transparency The design standards require 50 percent of the first floor elevation that is viewed by the public to include transparent windows and/or doors. All other areas shall include landscaping material and architectural detailing and articulation. The proposed building incorporates these elements on all four facades. Site Furnishing Community features include landscaping, lighting, and access to the pedestrian bridge. The site will incorporate patios with benches, chairs, tables and bike racks. BENCH (ENTRY %QIB) or BIKE RACKS IQ MAINEA TIR1H: LUYbGPE MR14 Rus: iAPA 4211ENCH OEWI& (IMT41 INUM FLAME, q[GiDNALL%SWIfM.[OYanOU MINUMCNRF0. IANDDLPP[ FigM> Arp IIENULL u MAIM :G0.TRLUANUMALWMC MMWEADNRFK: VJ106fhPF iDRFfi DERI MMTALU MIs RICKDERHB:CUTALUMINIIMRUME, RLLgINLL%SgUY.'®YADD Waipx rw 354 Planning Commission Gateway Medical Building — Planning Case 2014-21 November 17, 2015 Page 9 of 21 Loading Areas, Refuse Area, etc. The trash enclosure is located north of the building. The materials used shall be the same as those used on the proposed building. ENGINEERING The applicant is proposing to construct on 4,600 square -foot building and an accompanying parking lot 9,350 square feet in area; or 0.32 acres of new impervious surface. This phase will result in 0.75 acres of disturbance. The applicant has indicated they are considering a future building at a time to be determined. The applicant has a choice of either subdividing the property to accommodate the second building or obtain a Conditional Use Permit to allow multiple buildings on a single lot. Regardless of whether they subdivide or request to build it under a Conditional Use Permit, Storm Water Utility fees will be collected for the entire site at that time. The applicant is not requesting to rezone the property. EASEMENTS A drainage and utility easement was recorded in the Gateway East 2' Addition plat around the perimeter of the property as well as over the pond on the southeast corner of the property. The proposed garbage enclosure is located within this easement. The enclosure must be relocated, or the developer must enter into an encroachment agreement with the City. The City shall grant an easement for the maintenance and construction of the cul-de-sac island to the owner of this property. All easements, existing and proposed, shall be labeled in the plan set. SITE CONSTRAINTS Wetland Protection Neither the City of Chanhassen Wetland Inventory nor the National Wetland Inventory indicate the presence of a wetland on the subject property. A review of aerial photography and topographic maps lends support to the absence of wetland on the site. Bluff Protection There are no steep slopes or bluffs on the property. Shoreland Management The property is not within 1,000 feet of a lake or 300 feet of a riparian system and is, therefore, not within a shoreland overlay district. 355 Planning Commission Gateway Medical Building — Planning Case 2014-21 November 17, 2015 Page 10 of 21 Floodplain Overlay This property does not lie with a floodplain. Other Constraints This property is a known LUST (leaking underground storage tank) site. Contaminated soil has been found on-site. This soil contamination, although apparently contained, precludes the use of infiltration as a stormwater management practice. SITE GRADING: DRAINAGE The site drains from west to east and from north to south. There is a small detention pond in the southeast corner of the property. This pond was excavated with the construction of the water treatment plant. The proposed grading will continue the existing drainage pattern; however, runoff from the new impervious surface will be treated in an underground ContechTm CMP detention system before discharging to the existing pond. The grading and drainage plan (sheet C2) shows that the slope south of the proposed building will alter the drainage and force it to go immediately onto MnDOT right-of-way. This proposed grading will also have the potential to create a more erosive condition due to the increased channelization of flow. Grading south of proposed building shall be revised to minimize channelization of flows and to maintain drainage on the subject property. The latter may be excused if permission is granted from MnDOT. The developer's engineer shall provide a separate "existing conditions" plan page to show the existing conditions and topography of the site as well as all easements on the property. The plans shall show existing and proposed elevations at the lot corners and the corners of the proposed structure. The geotechnical analysis of the site included 10 boring locations. Three borings encountered groundwater approximately 20 feet below the proposed building floor elevations. SITE GRADING: EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL The proposed phase of development will not exceed one (1) acre of disturbance and therefore will not be subject to the General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination/State Disposal System (NPDES Construction Permit). However, the likely future expansion would be considered part of the same larger common plan of development and would exceed the one (1) acre threshold. In anticipation of this, the applicant has prepared a Surface Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for city review. This SWPPP will need to be a standalone document 356 Planning Commission Gateway Medical Building — Planning Case 2014-21 November 17, 2015 Page 11 of 21 that is consistent with the NPDES Construction Permit and shall contain all required elements as listed in Parts III and IV of the permit. The following changes are needed to the SWPPP and/or grading and erosion control plan: 1. Project designer shall work with city staff to assure accurate contacts are included on sheet SW_ 1. 2. References must be to appropriate storm water management BMPs. No infiltration is proposed on-site. (see DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVING WATERS on sheet SW -1) 3. Sheet SWI shall include Rice Marsh Lake as the receiving water. 4. Sheet SW -1 indicates that there will only be 0.07 acres of new impervious. Staff calculates the new impervious to be 0.32 acres. The SWPPP shall be amended to accurately reflect this. 5. Sheet SW2 — SOILS AND NATIVE TOPSOIL shall be amended to indicate that 6 inches of topsoil is required on all disturbed areas to be used as green space. 6. Sheet SW2 shall be amended to indicate that the city must receive a copy of the dewatering plan and approve before any dewatering can take place. 7. Note shall be added to SW2 indicating that all outlets must be stabilized within 24 hours of connection. 8. The graded slope south of the proposed building shall be stabilized with an appropriate rapid stabilization method as it discharges off site. 9. The pipe configuration used to outlet underground system into pond shall be made as shallow as possible and with as large a drop as possible into STM MHl so as to dissipate energy in the system and minimize rates. Ex. Raise SW invert by 1.5 feet to 948.3. 10. Sheet C3 shall use the city silt fence detail which shows that wooden posts are not allowed. 11. Sheet C3 shall use city detail for rock construction entrance or shall be amended to show that geotextile fabric must be placed under the rock. 12. The plans shall show locations proposed for stockpile areas. 13. A final stabilization plan will be needed. This is typically the landscaping plan. The sheet included shows only woody vegetation south of the building to the property line. This must indicate how this will be stabilized. 357 Planning Commission Gateway Medical Building — Planning Case 2014-21 November 17, 2015 Page 12 of 21 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT Article VII, Chapter 19 of City Code describes the required storm water management development standards. Section 19-141 states that "these development standards shall be reflected in plans prepared by developers and/or project proposers in the design and layout of site plans, subdivisions and water management features." City Code requires that the water quality treatment is either "consistent with NURP criteria" or meet(s) the MPCA NPDES construction permit for permanent stormwater management systems;" whichever is more restrictive. The NPDES requires that there is a reduction in total phosphorous (TP), total suspended solids (TSS) and total runoff volume post development and is considered the more restrictive. However, as Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District has recently begun implementing their rules, the development must meet those requirements. The developer, the watershed district and city staff met to discuss the site. It was determined that as a result of the presence of contaminants in the soil, infiltration would not be allowed. The developer is proposing to install a ContechTM CMP Detention System under the parking lot. While this can be designed to meet the water quality requirements, it does not address volume reduction. Infiltration is not the only method of volume reduction. The capture and use of rain water for irrigation is an accepted and frequently used method. The primary expense of the capture and use system is the storage which is already being installed with this project. Further, no water quality modeling has been provided to demonstrate that it does meet the requirements. The underground system will require pretreatment. The applicant is proposing to obtain the pretreatment through a one -foot sump in CB 1. It has been staff's observations that one -foot sumps are inadequate to prevent introduction of sediment downstream unless cleaned on a frequent and regular schedule. The sump should be no less than three feet in depth and a device such as the SAFL BaffleTM from Upstream Technologies or the PreserverTM from Momentum Technologies or equivalent shall be employed. Further, an operations and maintenance manual, including required maintenance shall be developed and submitted to the City. Agreements arranged with the watershed district regarding the long-term operation and maintenance of the facility will be adequate but must be made available to city staff. 1. The applicant must meet the requirements of all other jurisdictional agencies, including the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District. 2. The applicant must evaluate other methods of volume reduction, such as capture and use, to achieve volume reduction to the maximum extent practicable. 3. The applicant shall provide the city with a drainage map corresponding to the provided HydroCADTM model. This shall be used to determine if pre- and post -construction rates are consistent with city requirements. 4. The applicant shall provide water quality modeling to the city for review and approval. 5. The sump at CB 1 on CI shall be deepened to 3 feet and a device such as the SAFL baffle, the Preserver or equivalent shall be installed. 358 Planning Commission Gateway Medical Building — Planning Case 2014-21 November 17, 2015 Page 13 of 21 6. An operations and maintenance manual shall be developed and made available to the City. 7. The applicant shall enter into a maintenance agreement for the stormwater facility with either the watershed district or the city. Storm Water Utility Connection Charges Section 4-30 of the city code sets out the fees associated with surface water management. A stormwater development fee will be collected with the property upon application for a Conditional Use Permit or a subdivision for the future building. This fee will be calculated based upon the rates at that time. An estimate is shown below assuming no volume reduction and the entire 1.29 acres is assessable. Per acre rate Assessable Area Totals Water Quality $30,299.00 1.29 39,085.71 Volume Reduction Credit $0.00 1.29 based on 1" volume reduction) could be $15,149. 50 with full P 0.00 Total due (note a D& U over the pond would remove it from assessable area and reduce fee) 39,085.71 CUL-DE-SAC & PARKING LOT The plans propose a 30 -foot landscaping island in the center of the existing approximately 120 -foot cul- de-sac. Due to the proposed size of the island relative to the size of the cul-de- sac, traffic is unlikely to travel around the island and will go straight through the cul-de-sac instead. Possible conflicts would be created at the entrance to the proposed parking lot. The developer's engineer shall continue to work with city staff to find a geometric layout that would successfully route vehicles and minimize conflict. The Water Treatment Plant and Well Number 10 are located to the west of the cul-de-sac. In order to accommodate maintenance functions, staff will request City Council designate this area a "No -Parking" zone. The plans must label the dimensions of the parking spaces, drive aisle and the 26 -foot by 10 -foot turnaround at the end of the aisle. An additional plan sheet must be provided that does not show the "Phase 2" construction, but instead illustrates what is to be constructed on the site in "Phase 1" only. 359 Planning Commission Gateway Medical Building — Planning Case 2014-21 November 17, 2015 Page 14 of 21 The plans must show the driveway entrance grade. ON STREET PARKING The proposed development at 195 West 79th Street (Lot 2, Block 1 Gateway East 2nd Addition), includes construction of a 30 -foot diameter island in the center of the cul-de-sac on W 79" Street. This island would reduce the area of the cul-de-sac for parking and create an adverse condition for on -street parking at this location both around the exterior of the cul-de-sac and the interior island. The conditions of approval for the development's site plan include establishing a "No On -Street Parking" area within the cul-de-sac bubble, as shown on Figure 1. The proposed site plan includes sufficient on-site parking for the development. On -street parking would still be available on W 79th Street outside of the bubble. Proposed No Parking Area Proposcd Landscaping IslandILA 'r Y Figure 1: Proposed No Parking Zone SIDEWALK AND TRAIL This site is located adjacent to the regional trail that runs parallel along Trunk Highway 5. It is also near the pedestrian overpass across Trunk Highway 5. These are important trail facilities that provide pedestrians and cyclists north -south and east -west connections in Chanhassen. The plans propose a connection to the trail along Trunk Highway 5. This bituminous trail shall be revised into a concrete sidewalk that shall be owned and maintained by the property owner. To reduce hardcover and travel distance, staff will work with the developer's engineer to determine if this connection can be 360 Planning Commission Gateway Medical Building — Planning Case 2014-21 November 17, 2015 Page 15 of 21 made directly to the switchback trail rather than following the curve of the cul-de-sac. The plans shall be revised to show dimensions for the width of the proposed sidewalks. The plan proposes a sidewalk in front of the building along the parking lot. These plans must comply with all ADA regulations for the site. SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN Sewer service has already been constructed at the location shown on the plans. The proposed plan will adjust and tie into the existing service. The water main service will be provided from the 16 -inch water main that runs north -south along the western property line. All utility services shall be privately owned and maintained. Fees for city water and sanitary sewer connections shall be collected with the building permit. LANDSCAPING Minimum requirements for landscaping at the proposed development include 765 square feet of landscaped area around the parking lot, landscape islands or peninsulas, and three trees for the parking lot. The applicant's proposed as compared to the requirements for landscape area and parking lot trees is shown in the following table: The applicant meets minimum requirements for trees and landscaping in the parking lot area. Bufferyard requirements: Re aired Proposed Vehicular use landscape area 765 sq. ft. 795 sq. ft. Trees/ parking lot 3 trees 3 trees Islands or peninsulas/parking lot 1 islands/peninsulas 2 islands/peninsulas The applicant meets minimum requirements for trees and landscaping in the parking lot area. Bufferyard requirements: The bufferyard requirements have not been met. The applicant will need to increase plantings in order to meet minimum requirements. Required plantings Proposed plantings Bufferyard B — north 1 overstory trees 1 overstory prop. line, 150' 3 Understory trees 0 Understory trees 6 Shrubs 0 Shrubs Bufferyard B — south 1 overstory trees 0 Overstory trees prop. line, Hwy 5, 150' 3 Understory trees 3 Understory trees 6 Shrubs 10 Shrubs The bufferyard requirements have not been met. The applicant will need to increase plantings in order to meet minimum requirements. 361 Planning Commission Gateway Medical Building — Planning Case 2014-21 November 17, 2015 Page 16 of 21 PARKS The plans show sidewalks that connect to city trails throughout the site. COMPLIANCE TABLE Lot Ordinance Requirements BH Proposed Development Lot Coverage 65% 26% Building Height Ordinance Requirements Sub'ect Site Principal 2 story 1 Story Building Setbacks Ordinance Requirements SuMect Site North Front yard 25' 30 South Side yard 10' 90 East Front Yard 25' 400 West Front yard 25' 30 Parking Requirements Ordinance Requirements Sub'ect Site Stalls 28 31 Lot Area 20,000 1.29 Ac SITE PLAN FINDINGS In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the City shall consider the development's compliance with the following: 1) Consistency with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; 2) Consistency with this division; 3) Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing areas; 4) Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; 5) Creation of functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: 362 Planning Commission Gateway Medical Building — Planning Case 2014-21 November 17, 2015 Page 17 of 21 b. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; c. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; d. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and e. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. 6) Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. Finding: The proposed development is consistent with the City's design requirements, the comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance, the design standards, and the site plan review requirements. Staff is recommending approval of the request with conditions. The site design is compatible with the surrounding developments. It is functional and harmonious with the area. Staff regards the project as a reasonable use of the land. The overall design is sensitive to the city's image. Based upon the foregoing, staff is recommending approval of the site plan with conditions outlined in the staff report. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the following three motions: SITE PLAN APPROVAL The Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the site plan consisting of a 4,300 square -foot medical office building, Planning Case 2015-21, as shown in plans dated received October 16, 2015, and including the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation, subject to the following conditions: Environmental Resources: The applicant shall increase bufferyard plantings along Hwy 5 and the north property line to meet minimum requirements. 363 Planning Commission Gateway Medical Building — Planning Case 2014-21 November 17, 2015 Page 18 of 21 Plannine: 1. All rooftop equipment must be screened. 2. The materials used on the trash enclosure must be the same material as the building. 3. Off -premise Directional sign criteria: a. The sign shall not exceed 8 feet in height. b. The sign area shall not exceed 32 square feet. c. The sign shall be located outside of the sight triangle and shall not interfere with the driver's intersection sight distance. d. The sign shall maintain a minimum of 10 feet from the back of the curb. e. The sign shall maintain a 1.5 foot separation from the trail. f. The sign shall not be illuminated. g. The sign shall not interfere with snow removal operations. h. The sign lettering shall not exceed 6 inches and have a uniform style. i. The sign shall only include the names and logos of the businesses and a directional arrow. j. The sign design shall compliment the design and materials of the proposed building. k. The sign shall not obstruct driver's views of any city owned street signage or railroad signage. 1. The sign will be owned and maintained by the City. m. The applicant shall construct the sign. 4. Staff will work with the applicant to finalize design of the directional sign. 5. All signs must meet city ordinance. A sign permit is required prior to erecting any signs. Buildin¢: 1. The building(s) are required to have automatic fire -extinguishing systems. 2. Building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 3. Any retaining walls over four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a permit must be obtained prior to construction. 4. Detailed occupancy -related requirements will be addressed when complete building plans are submitted. 5. The owner and/or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. Fire Marshal: 364 Planning Commission Gateway Medical Building — Planning Case 2014-21 November 17, 2015 Page 19 of 21 1. An additional fire hydrant will be required. Contact Fire Marshal for exact location. 2. A three-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants. En ingeering: 1. The trash enclosure must be relocated, or the developer must enter into an encroachment agreement with the City. 2. An easement for the maintenance and construction of the cul-de-sac island shall be recorded with the purchase agreement of this property. 3. All easements, existing and proposed, shall be labeled in the plan set. 4. The developer's engineer shall provide a separate "existing conditions" plan page to show the existing conditions and topography of the site as well as existing easements on the property. 5. Revise grading south of proposed building to minimize channelization of flows and to maintain drainage on the subject property. The latter may be excused if permission granted from MnDOT. 6. Project designer shall work with city staff to assure accurate contacts are included on sheet SW -1. 7. References must be to appropriate storm water management BMPs. No infiltration is proposed on-site. (see DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVING WATERS on sheet SW -1) 8. Sheet SWI shall include Rice Marsh Lake as the receiving water. 9. Sheet SW -1 indicates that there will only be 0.07 acres of new impervious. Staff calculates the new impervious to be 0.32 acres. The SWPPP shall be amended to accurately reflect this. 10. Sheet SW2 — SOILS AND NATIVE TOPSOIL shall be amended to indicate that six inches of topsoil is required on all disturbed areas to be used as green space. 11. Sheet SW2 shall be amended to indicate that the city must receive a copy of the dewatering plan and approve before any dewatering can take place. 12. Note shall be added to SW2 indicating that all outlets must be stabilized within 24 hours of connection. 13. The graded slope south of the proposed building shall be stabilized with an appropriate rapid stabilization method for offsite discharges. 14. The pipe configuration used to outlet underground system into pond shall be made as shallow as possible and with as large a drop as possible into STM MH1 so as to dissipate energy in the system and minimize rates. Ex. Raise SW invert by 1.5 feet to 948.3. 365 Planning Commission Gateway Medical Building — Planning Case 2014-21 November 17, 2015 Page 20 of 21 15. Sheet C3 shall use the city silt fence detail which shows that wooden posts are not allowed. 16. Sheet C3 shall use city detail for rock construction entrance or shall be amended to show that geotexfile fabric must be placed under the rock. 17. A final stabilization plan will be needed. This is typically the landscaping plan. The sheet included shows only woody vegetation south of the building to the property line. This must indicate how this will be stabilized. 18. The applicant must meet the requirements of all other jurisdictional agencies, including the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District. 19. The applicant must evaluate other methods of volume reduction, such as capture and use, to achieve volume reduction to the maximum extent practicable. 20. The applicant shall provide the city with a drainage map corresponding to the provided HydroCADTM model. This shall be used to determine if pre- and post -construction rates are consistent with city requirements. 21. The applicant shall provide water quality modeling to the city for review and approval. 22. The sump at CB 1 on Cl shall be deepened to three feet and a device such as the SAFL baffle, the Preserver or equivalent shall be installed. 23. An operations and maintenance manual shall be developed and made available to the City. 24. The applicant shall enter into a maintenance agreement for the stormwater facility with either the watershed district or the city. 25. The plans shall show locations proposed for stockpile areas. 26. The plans shall show existing and proposed elevations at the lot corners and the corners of the proposed structure. 27. The developer's engineer shall continue to work with City staff to find a geometric layout that would successfully route vehicles and minimize conflict. 28. The plans must label the dimensions of the parking spaces, drive aisle and the 26 -foot by10- foot turnaround at the end of the aisle. 29. An additional plan sheet must be provided that does not show the "Phase 2" construction, but instead illustrates what is to be constructed on the site in "Phase 1" only. 30. The plans must show the driveway entrance grade. 31. The bituminous trail shall be revised into a concrete sidewalk that shall be owned and maintained by the property owner. 366 Planning Commission Gateway Medical Building — Planning Case 2014-21 November 17, 2015 Page 21 of 21 32. The plans shall be revised to show dimensions for the width of the proposed sidewalks and trails. 33. These plans must comply with all ADA regulations for the site. 34. The developer's engineer shall work with City staff to determine if a connection can be made directly to the switchback trail that leads to the pedestrian bridge across Trunk Highway 5. 35. All of the service utilities shall be privately owned and maintained. 36. Fees for City water and sanitary sewer connections shall be collected with the building permit." ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation. 2. Application and Project Narrative. 3. Plans dated received October 16, 2015. 4. Letter from MnDOT received November 5, 2015. 5. Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Mailing. g;\plan\2015 planning cases\2015-21 gateway east 2nd addition lot 2 blk 1\staff report.doc 367 7. Geotechnical Exploration Report 368 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING FOR QUALITY AND STRENGTH October 26, 2015 CEL Project Number: L-15034 RBSC Chanhassen LLC C/o Mr. Randall Schold 8925 Twin Lakes Crossing Eden Prairie, MN 55347 Re: Geotechnical Exploration Report, Chanhassen Commercial Development Northwest Quadrant, State Highway 5 and State Highway 101 Chanhassen, Minnesota Dear Mr. Schold: We have completed the geotechnical exploration report for the proposed commercial development in Chanhassen, Minnesota. The purpose of this geotechnical exploration was to characterize subsurface soil and ground water conditions and provide recommendations for foundation support and site development. Ten standard penetration test soil borings were completed for this project that encountered about 9 to 19 feet, but more commonly about 12 to 14 feet, of Fill overlying native lean clay or sandy lean clay glacial till that extended to the termination depths of the borings. The Fill generally contained poor quality soils including topsoil and buried topsoil that was black in color and judged to be slightly organic. We also encountered some wood and pieces of concrete and bituminous in some of the borings. And we noted some fuel or petroleum like odors at a depth of about 20 feet in one of the soil borings. The Fill is not suitable for foundation support and soil corrections to remove the Fill and replace it with suitable compacted engineered fill will be required to provide adequate foundation support for the new building(s). Soil corrections extending up to about 19 feet below the ground surface will be required within the building and oversize areas. Alternately the proposed buildings could be supported on a Rammed Aggregate Pier/Geopier foundation system. Specific details regarding our procedures, results and recommendations follow in the attached geotechnical exploration report. Our services were performed in accordance with CEL revised proposal P15017 dated April 27, 2015. Thank you for the opportunity to assist you on this project. If you have any questions or need additional information please contact Paul Gionfriddo at 763-954-1101 Sincerely, Construction Engineering Laboratory Paul S. Gionfriddo P.E. Geotechnical Engineering Manager 369 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING FOR QUALITY AND STRENGTH G EOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION REPORT PROJECT: Proposed Chanhassen Commercial Development Northwest Quadrant, State Highway 5 and State Highway 101 Chanhassen, Minnesota PREPARED FOR: RBSC Chanhassen LLC C/o Mr. Randall Schold 8925 Twin Lakes Crossing Eden Prairie, MN 55347 PREPARED BY: Construction Engineering Laboratory 5661 International Parkway Minneapolis, MN 55428 Construction Engineering Laboratory Project: L-15034 October 26, 2015 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Paul Gionfriddo, P.E. Geotechnical Engineering Manager License Number 23093 Expires June 2016 370 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING FOR QUALITY AND STRENGTH TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE NO. 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Field Procedures 2 3.0 Results 3 4.0 Discussions and Recommendations 4 5.0 Construction Considerations 9 6.0 Procedures 10 7.0 General 11 Appendix Boring Location Sketch Soil Boring Logs General Terminology Notes Soil Classification Chart 371 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING FOR QUALITY AND STRENGTH 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project description RBSC Chanhassen LLC retained Construction Engineering Laboratory (CEL) to perform a geotechnical exploration for a proposed commercial development to be constructed on a vacant parcel of land in the northwest quadrant of the intersections of State Highway 5 and State Highway 101 in Chanhassen, MN. The project will be completed in 2 phases with Phase I consisting of an approximate 4,500 square foot building and Phase II consisting of an approximate 7,000 square foot building. Bituminous parking and drive areas, underground utilities and a stormwater pond will also be constructed as part of the project(s). 1.2 Purpose The purpose of this geotechnical exploration was to characterize subsurface soil and groundwater conditions and provide recommendations for foundation design and site development. 1.3 Site Description As mentioned above the project site is located in the northwest quadrant of the intersections of State Highway 5 and State Highway 101 in Chanhassen, MN. Access to the site is off the east end of a cul-de-sac at the end of 79th Street W. The project site currently exists as a vacant parcel of land that contained an approximate 165 foot by 70 foot gravel surfaced parking lot adjacent to the cul-de-sac and a pond in the southeast corner of the property. Except for the parking lot the property was covered with grasses and weeds. The ground surface was relatively flat with the ground surface generally sloping downward toward the pond in the southeast corner of the property. Ground surface elevation at the boring locations ranged from about 962 to 952 feet mean sea level. 1.4 Scope of Services Our services were performed in accordance with CEL Revised proposal P-15017 which was dated April 27, 2015. Our scope of services was limited to the following tasks:  Completing 9 standard penetration test borings. Four of the borings were completed within the footprint of the proposed buildings and extended to nominal depths 25 feet. Three (3) borings were completed within the proposed parking areas and extend to nominal depths of 10 feet and two borings were completed for environmental purposes and extended to nominal depths of 10 feet.  Visually classifying the samples recovered from the soil borings.  Performing laboratory tests on selected samples recovered from the soil borings.  Preparing soil boring logs describing the materials encountered and the results of the water level measurements. 372 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING FOR QUALITY AND STRENGTH 2  Prepare an engineering report describing soil and groundwater conditions and providing recommendations for foundation design and site development. One (1) additional boring, extending to a nominal depth of 10 feet, was completed to evaluate soil conditions for design and construction of a stormwater pond. 1.5 Documents Provided We were provided with 3 plan sheets for the project. Two of the plan sheets were titled “Site Plan 4” and “Site Plan 5” which showed Phase I and Phase II, respectively, of the development overlain onto an aerial photograph. We were also provided a copy of the Plat of the Gateway East 2nd Addition. The Plat map was prepared by Hansen Thorp Pellinen and Olson, Inc. (HTPO) and provided survey information of the property. Specific design information or structural plans and drawings were not available at the time of this report. 1.6 Locations and Elevations Seven of the soil boring locations (SB-1 thru SB-7) were selected by CEL and were based upon the locations of the proposed building and parking and drive areas. The location of soil boring SB-8 was selected by the project civil engineer, APA Consulting Engineers and Surveyors, based on the location of the proposed stormwater pond and soil boring locations SB-9 and SB-10 were selected by the Javelin Group to evaluate potential environment concerns. With the exception of borings SB-9 and SB-10, the borings were staked in the field and ground surface elevations at the boring locations were measured by APA Consulting Engineers and Surveyors. The approximate locations of the borings are shown on the “Soil Boring Location Sketch” in the appendix. 2.0 FIELD PROCEDURES The 10 standard penetration test (SPT) borings were advanced on May 7, 2015 by Haugo GeoTechnical Services, LLC (HGTS) with a rotary drilling rig, using continuous flight augers to advance the boreholes. Representative samples were obtained from the borings, using the split- barrel sampling procedures in general accordance with ASTM Specification D-1586. In the split- barrel sampling procedure, a 2-inch O.D. split-barrel spoon is driven into the ground with a 140- pound hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampling spoon the last 12 inches of an 18-inch penetration is recorded as the standard penetration resistance value, or "N" value. The results of the standard penetration tests are indicated on the boring log. The samples were sealed in containers and provided to CEL for testing and soil classification. 373 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING FOR QUALITY AND STRENGTH 3 A field log of each boring was prepared by the HGTS drill crew. The logs contained visual classifications of the soil materials encountered during drilling, as well as the driller's interpretation of the subsurface conditions between samples and water observation notes. The final boring logs included with this report represent an interpretation of the field logs and include modifications based on visual/manual method observation of the samples. The soil boring logs, general terminology for soil description and identification, and classification of soils for engineering purposes are also included in the appendix. The soil boring logs identify and describe the materials encountered, the relative density or consistency based on the Standard Penetration resistance (N-value, “blows per foot”) and groundwater observations. The strata changes were inferred from the changes in the samples and auger cuttings. The depths shown as changes between strata are only approximate. The changes are likely transitions, variations can occur beyond the location of the boring. 3.0 RESULTS 3.1 Soil Conditions Building Borings Soil borings SB-1 thru SB-4 were taken within or near the footprints for the proposed building. Soil borings SB-1, SB-3 and SB-4 encountered a relatively thin layer of vegetation and topsoil at the surface. The topsoil consisted of sandy lean clay that was black in color and judged to be slightly organic. Soil boring SB-2 encountered about 8 inches of silty sand and gravel (aggregate base) at the surface which was associated with the existing gravel parking lot on the property. Below the topsoil or aggregate base the borings encountered previously placed Fill and buried topsoil that extended to depth ranging from about 9 to 19 feet below the ground surface. The Fill in borings SB-1, SB-SB-2 and SB-4 consisted of sandy lean clay that was black to dark brown in color and contained some roots. The Fill encountered in boring SB-3 consisted of poorly graded sand that contained some pieces of concrete. Topsoil/buried topsoil was encountered in borings SB2 and SB-3 that consisted of sandy lean clay that was black in color and contained some roots and fibers. Organic content tests showed the topsoil and buried topsoil to be slightly organic. Below the Fill or Buried topsoil borings predominantly encountered native sandy lean clay glacial till that extended to the termination depths of the borings. An approximate 4 foot layer of poorly graded sand with silt was encountered in soil boring SB-3 at about 19 feet below the ground surface that extended to a depth of about 24 feet. Penetration resistance values (N-Values), shown as blows per foot (bpf) on the boring logs, within the clay Fill (sandy lean clay) ranged from 4 to 11 bpf. These values indicate that the clay 374 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING FOR QUALITY AND STRENGTH 4 Fill had a rather soft to rather stiff consistency. N-Values within the sand Fill ranged from 14 to 15 bpf indicating a medium dense relative density. N-Values within the native sandy lean clay glacial till ranged from 3 to 18 bpf but most of the values ranged form 8 to 18 bpf. These values indicate that the glacial till had a soft to very stiff consistency but were medium to very stiff overall. The N-value within native sand encountered in boring SB-3 was 4 bpf indicating a very loose relative density. Parking and Drive Lane Borings Soil borings SB-5, SB-6 and SB-7 were taken within the proposed parking and drive areas. These borings encountered about 1 to 8 inches of silty sand and gravel (aggregate base) or topsoil at the ground surface. The aggregate base was associated with the exiting gravel parking lot on the property. Below the aggregate base or topsoil the borings encountered varying thicknesses of sandy lean clay Fill that extended to depths ranging from about 7 to 12 feet below the ground surface. The Fill varied in color from brown to dark brown to gray to black. N-values within the Fill ranged from 3 to 18 bpf indicating a soft to very stiff consistency. The wide range in N-Values also indicates that the fill was likely not compacted as it was placed. Below the Fill the borings encountered about 2 to 6 feet of buried topsoil that extended to depths ranging from about 12 to 14 feet below the ground surface. The buried topsoil contained some roots and fibers, was black in color and judged to be slightly organic. Beneath the buried topsoil the borings encountered native sandy lean clay glacial till that extended to the termination depths of the borings. N-Values within the native glacial till ranged from 6 to 16 bpf indicating the glacial till had a medium to very stiff consistency. Stormwater Pond Boring Soil boring SB-8 was completed in the area of the proposed stromwater pond and encountered about 1 inch of topsoil at the surface underlain by about 4 feet of sandy lean clay Fill. N-values within the Fill was 8 bpf indicating a medium consistency. Below the Fill the boring encountered about 8 feet of buried topsoil comprised of sandy lean clay that contained some wood and roots underlain by about 2 feet of sandy lean clay Fill. The buried topsoil was judged to be slightly organic and the underlying Fill had a rather soft consistency (N-Value of 4). Native sandy lean clay glacial till was encountered below the Fill and buried topsoil. The native glacial till had an N-Value of 12 indicating a rather stiff consistency. Environmental Borings Soil borings SB-9 and S-B10 were completed to evaluate potential environmental concerns. These borings encountered about 1/2 foot of sandy lean clay topsoil at the surface underlain by sandy lean clay Fill that extended to the termination depth of the borings at about 11 feet below the ground surface. N-values within the Fill ranged from 3 to 9 bpf with most of the values between 3 and 5 bpf. These values indicate ht Fill had soft to rather stiff consistency but was soft to rather soft overall. These values also indicate that the fill was likely not compacted as it was placed. 375 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING FOR QUALITY AND STRENGTH 5 3.2 Groundwater Groundwater was encountered in soil borings SB-1, SB-2 and SB-3 at depths ranging from about 19 to 23 feet below the ground surface corresponding to elevations ranging from about 933 to 941 feet Mean Sea Level (MSL). The groundwater encountered in soil boring SB-3 appears to be perched within the more permeable sand soils above the sandy lean clay glacial till. Groundwater was not encountered in the remaining soil borings while drilling or after removing the augers form the boreholes. It should be noted that the borings were completed in clayey soils. In clay soils it may take several hours or days for groundwater to reach its hydrostatic level in an open borehole. Groundwater levels could be higher than indicated on the boring logs. In addition the clay soils can contain sand seams or sand layers and ground water can be encountered within them which may not become apparent until construction. Groundwater measurements were made as noted and shown on the boring logs. Groundwater monitoring wells or piezometers would be required to more accurately determine water levels. Seasonal and annual fluctuations in the groundwater levels should be expected. 3.3 Laboratory Tests Laboratory moisture content and organic content tests were performed on selected samples recovered from the soil borings. Laboratory test results indicated that soil moisture contents ranged from about 17 to 28 and the organic contents ranged form about 3 to 6 percent. Laboratory test results are shown on the boring logs adjacent to the sample tested. We also performed laboratory “pocket penetrometer” tests on selected samples recovered from the borings. The pocket penetrometer uses a calibrated spring to estimate the soils unconfined compressive strength. Pocket penetrometer results ranged form ½ tons per square foot (tsf) to 3½ tsf. Results are shown on the boring log adjacent to the sample tested. 3.4 OSHA Soil Classification The soil encountered in the borings at the anticipated excavations depths predominantly consisted of silty clay corresponding to the ASTM Classification CL or CL-ML. The soils identified in the borings will be Type B soils under Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) guidelines. 3.5 Environmental Considerations Environmental sampling and analysis was beyond the scope of this geotechnical exploration. However, petroleum like odors were noted in the soil samples collected from soil boring SB-3 at a depth of about 29 feet. To further evaluate the petroleum odors the Javelin Group performed a Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, the results of which were presented in their report dated October 15, 2015. Based upon a brief review of that report we understand that 376 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING FOR QUALITY AND STRENGTH 6 residual petroleum contamination remains. The report recommended soil sampling and analysis to assess proper soil handling and management options in the event that potential unforeseen impacts are encountered during future site redevelopment. Please refer to that report for specific information regarding their procedures results and recommendations. 4.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 Proposed Construction The project will be constructed in 2 phases with Phase I including an approximate 4,500 square foot, 2-story commercial building and Phase II including an approximate 7,000 square foot, 2- story commercial buildings. Each building will be 2-story slab-on grade structure. The project will also include bituminous parking and drive areas, underground utilities and a stormwater pond. The project is in the preliminary design phase and specific structural design information was not available for our use in preparing this report. We assume the commercial buildings will be constructed at or near exiting site grades. We anticipate each building will consist of masonry block, or cast in-place concrete foundation walls supported on concrete strip footings. Above grade construction is anticipated to consist of a combination of structural steel, structural masonry or structural concrete. Perimeter wall load are estimated to range from about 4 to 6 kips (4,000 to 5,000 pounds) per lineal foot with maximum column loads, if any, of about 200 kips (400,000 pounds). We further assume the new parking and drive lanes will be constructed at or near exiting site grades so that cuts or fills for permanent grade changes are assumed to be less than three (3) feet. 4.2 Discussion The soil borings completed for this project encountered a foot of vegetation, root zone and topsoil at the surface. The vegetation, root zone and topsoil are not suitable for foundation support and will need to be removed from within the proposed building pad area, pavement areas and utility trenches The origin of the Fill encountered in the soil borings is not known exhibited. It exhibited vary N- values which indicates that it was likely not compacted as it was placed and contained some debris as well as roots and fibers. In addition we are not aware of any information regarding previous earthwork operations or building pad preparation for this property and we are not aware of any documentation indicating that the fill was observed or tested during placement. Un-compacted or poorly compacted Fill can settle under the anticipated building loads resulting in distress to footings, floor slabs or other components of the new building(s). Buried topsoil was encountered within the soil borings and the results of organic content tests on selected samples indicated the buried topsoil was slightly organic to organic. Organic soils or soil containing organic material are generally compressible and can settle under the loads associated with the new buildings. 377 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING FOR QUALITY AND STRENGTH 7 For these reasons the previously placed Fill and buried topsoil, in our opinion, should not be relied upon for foundation support and will need to be removed and replaced with suitable compacted engineered fill. Based on the soil borings we anticipate excavation depths ranging from about 9 to 14 feet and possibly deeper withy within the building and oversize areas. Given the depths of excavations, soil corrections may not be a cost effective solution for foundation support. Alternately the proposed structures could be supported on Geopiers/ Rammed Aggregate Piers (RAP’s). The following sections provide recommendations for supporting the foundations on engineered fill following soil corrections or for supporting the foundations on Geopiers/RAP’s. 4.3 Building Pad Preparation – Soil Corrections Excavation We recommend that all vegetation, topsoil, organic soils and any other soft or loose soil be removed from the proposed building and oversize area. Based on the soil borings we anticipate excavation depths ranging from about 9 to 14 feet or more within the building areas. The following table indicates the anticipated excavation depths at the boring locations within the building pad area. Table 1. Anticipated Excavation Depths Boring Number Surface Elevation (feet) Anticipated Excavation Depth (feet)* Anticipated Excavation Elevation (feet)* Anticipated Groundwater Elevation (feet)* SB-1 956.2 9 947 933 SB-2 959.3 14 945 ½ 936 ½ SB-3 960.0 14 to 19 946 to 941 941 SB-4 959.2 12 947 NE SB-5 (Parking) 961.7 1 960 ½ NE SB-6 (Parking) 958.0 ½ 957 ½ NE SB-7 (Parking) 954.9 ½ 954 ½ NE SB-8 (Pond) 952.6 - - NE SB-9 (Env.) 955.4 - - NE SB-10 (Env.) 955.8 - - NE NE = Not Encountered. * = Excavation elevations and groundwater elevations were rounded to the nearest ½ foot. Soils that become loose or disturbed and loose strength during excavation activities will need to be re-compacted to provide adequate foundation support. Soils that cannot be recompacted will need to be removed and replaced with suitable compacted engineered fill or stabilizing aggregate (clear rock). 378 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING FOR QUALITY AND STRENGTH 8 Fill required to attain site grades and may consist of any debris-free, non-organic mineral soil. Portions, quantity unknown, of the existing Fill may be suitable for use or re-use as fill or backfill provided it is free of organic material or other deleterious material. The clay soils appear to be above their estimated optimum moisture content and some moisture conditioning (drying) of these soils will likely be required to meet the recommended compaction levels. Organic soils, including soils that are black in color, topsoil and buried topsoil removed during soil corrections are not suitable for re-use as fill or backfill. Backfilling We recommend that backfill placed with the proposed building area be compacted to a minimum of 98 percent of its standard Proctor density, (ASTM D 698) except the upper 3 feet of pavement areas, where the compaction level should be increased to a minimum of 100 percent. Fill should be placed within 3 percentage points above and 1 percentage point below its optimum moisture content as determined by the standard Proctor. All fill should be placed in thin lifts and be compacted with a large self-propelled vibratory compactor operating in vibratory mode. Foundations We recommend the perimeter footings bear a minimum of 42 inches below the exterior grade for frost protection. Interior footings may be placed immediately below the slab provided construction does not occur during below freezing weather conditions. We recommend foundation elements in unheated areas, such as canopy footings, bear at least 5 feet below exterior grade for frost protection. We anticipate the foundations and floor slabs will bear on compacted engineered fill or native clayey soils. With the building pad(s) prepared as recommended it is our opinion the footings can be designed for a net allowable bearing pressure up to 3,000 psf. 4.4 Interior Slabs The anticipated floor subgrade is granular fill over compacted clay fill or native clay soils. It is our opinion a modulus of subgrade reaction, k, of 200 pounds per square inch of deflection (psi) may be used to design the floor. If floor coverings or coatings less permeable than the concrete slab will be used, we recommend that a vapor retarder or vapor barrier be placed immediately beneath the slab. Some contractors prefer to bury the vapor barrier or vapor retarder beneath a layer of sand to reduce curling and shrinkage, but this practice often traps water between the slab and vapor retarder or barrier. Regardless of where the vapor retarder or vapor barrier is placed, we recommend consulting the floor covering manufacturer regarding the appropriate type, use and installation of the vapor retarder or vapor barrier to preserve the warranty. 4.5 Below Grade Walls We assume the shrine will be a slab on grade structure and do not anticipate that any below grade walls will be constructed as part of this project. 379 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING FOR QUALITY AND STRENGTH 9 Recommendations for below grade wall design and construction can be provided if requested or required. 4.6 Exterior Slabs Exterior slabs will be underlain by clayey soils (sandy lean clay) which are highly frost susceptible. If these soils become saturated and freeze, significant heave may occur. This heave can be a nuisance in front of doors and at other critical grade areas. One way to help reduce the potential for heaving is to remove the frost-susceptible soils below the slabs down to bottom of footing grades, and replace them with non-frost-susceptible backfill consisting of sand having less than 5 percent of the particles by weight passing the number 200 sieve. If this approach is used and the excavation bottoms terminate in non-free draining granular soil we recommend a drain tile be installed along the bottom outer edges of the excavation to collect and remove any water that may accumulate within the sand. The bottom of the excavation should be graded away from the building. If the banks of the excavations to remove the frost-susceptible soils are not sloped, abrupt transitions between the frost-susceptible and non-frost-susceptible backfill will exist along which unfavorable amounts of differential heaving may occur. Such transitions could exist between exterior slabs and sidewalks, between exterior slabs and pavements and along the slabs themselves if the excavations are confined to only the building entrances. To address this issue we recommend sloping the excavations to remove frost-susceptible soils at a minimum 3:1 (horizontal: vertical) gradient. An alternative method of reducing frost heave is to place a minimum of 2 inches of extruded polystyrene foam insulation beneath the slabs and extending it about 4 feet beyond the slabs. The insulation will reduce frost penetration into the underlying soil and reduce heave. Six to 12 inches of granular soil is typically placed over the insulation to protect it during construction. Another alternative for reducing frost heave is to support the slabs on frost depth footings. A void space of at least 4 inches should be provided between the slab and the underlying soil to allow the soil to heave without affecting the slabs. 4.7 Site Grading and Drainage We recommend the site be graded to provide positive run-off away from the proposed building. We recommend landscaped areas be sloped a minimum of 6 inches within 10 feet of the building and slabs be sloped a minimum of 2 inches. In addition we recommend downspouts with long splash blocks or extensions for each house. 4.8 Utilities We anticipate that the utilities will be supported on the native clays or compacted engineered fill following soil corrections. The native clay soils, in our opinion are generally suitable for pipe 380 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING FOR QUALITY AND STRENGTH 10 support. We recommend removing all organic soils, soft or other unsuitable soil, if any, beneath utilities prior to placement. We recommend bedding material be thoroughly compacted around the pipes. We recommend that fill and backfill placed in the trench above the pipes be compacted in accordance with the “Backfilling” paragraph within Section 4.3 above. In summary we recommend a minimum of 95 percent beneath slabs and pavements, the exception being within 3 feet of the proposed pavement subgrade, where 100 percent of standard Proctor density is required. In landscaped areas we recommend a minimum compaction of 90 percent. 4.9 Pavements Based on site plans provided we understand the parking lot will eventually include about 60 stalls. Assuming the parking lot will turnover twice daily we estimate that 120 vehicle per day will use the lot. We further assume the pavements will be limited to use by automobiles, light trucks. We do not anticipate that heavier vehicles will use the pavements. We assume the pavement will be subjected to less than 50,000 Equivalent Single Axle Loads (EASL’s) over a design life of 20 years and further assume the parking and drive areas will be bituminous pavements. We recommend removing all vegetation and topsoil, or other unsuitable materials from within 3 feet of the pavement subgrade elevation. Backfill, if needed, to attain pavement subgrade elevation can consist of any mineral soil provided it is free of organic material or other deleterious materials. We recommend compacting the backfill at moisture contents within a range of 1 percentage point below and 3 percentage points above its optimum moisture content. The upper 3 feet of fill and backfill should be compacted to a minimum of 100 percent of its standard Proctor maximum dry density. Prior to placing the aggregate base (Class 5) we recommend proof rolling the pavement subgrade to identify soft, weak, loose or unstable areas that may require additional subcuts. We anticipate the subgrade soil will be predominantly clayey in nature (lean clay and silty). Because of the poor frost/drainage properties of the clay subgrade soil on the site we recommend you consider placing a minimum 1 foot thick drained sand subbase below the aggregate base course in the new pavement areas. We recommend using sand with less than 12% passing the #200 sieve, such as Mn/DOT 3149.2B2. If the sand subbase is used we recommend the subbase extend beneath the curbs and to 2 feet beyond the outside edges of the curbs for frost and drainage uniformity. Sand layers outside the curbs should be capped with slow draining soil to reduce surface water infiltration. If a sand subbase is used in the pavement areas, drainpipes (drain tile) should be installed to remove infiltrating water. The drain tile should be connected to the catch basins. The slope of the bottom of the subcut should be such that water is directed to the drainage areas. The subcut bottom should not include depressions that can act as reservoirs for water collection. R-Value testing was beyond the scope of this project. The soil borings encountered predominantly of clayey soil corresponding to the ASTM classification CL. These materials 381 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING FOR QUALITY AND STRENGTH 11 typically have R-Values ranging from 6 to 15. We recommend using an R-Value of 10 for pavement design. Based on an estimated R-value of 10 and a maximum of 50,000 ESAL’s we recommend a light duty pavement section consisting of 3½ inches of bituminous (1½ inches of wear course and 2 inches of base) and a minimum of 9 inches of aggregate base. We recommend aggregate base meeting MN/DOT specification 3138 for Class 5 aggregate base. We recommend the aggregate base be compacted to 100 percent of its maximum standard Proctor dry density. We recommend that the bituminous wear and base courses meet the requirement of MN/DOT specification 2360. We recommend the bituminous pavements be compacted to at least 92% of the maximum theoretical density. We assume the parking and drive lanes will include concrete curb and gutter. We recommend specifying concrete that has a minimum 28 day compressive strength of 4,000 psi. We recommend specifying 5 to 8 percent entrained air for exposed concrete to provide resistance to freeze-thaw deterioration. We recommend slump, air content and compressive strength test of Portland cement concrete. 4.9 Infiltration Rates Based on the plan sheets provided it appears that a stormwater pond/infiltration pond will be constructed near the southeast quadrant of the project site. Soil boring SB-8 was completed in the area of the stormwater pond. Soil boring SB-8 encountered buried topsoil, Fill and native glacial till soils that consisted of sandy lean clay corresponding to the ASTM Classification CL. Table 12.BIO.8 within the Minnesota Stormwater Manual, Version 2, 2008 which was updated in December 2013 recommends using a soil infiltration rate of 0.06 inches per hour for stormwater pond design in clay soils. Field tests (double ring infiltrometer) can be performed within the proposed rain garden area to verify infiltration rates of the in-situ soils. We would be pleased to provide these services if required or requested. 4.10 Geopiers/Rammed Aggregate Piers As mentioned in the Discussion Section, soil corrections may not be economically feasible give the depths of excavations that will be required for soil corrections. As an alternate the foundations for the buildings could be supported on Geopiers or Rammed Aggregate Piers. In very general and brief terms Geopier/Rammed Aggregate Piers is initiated by drilling a 24 to 36 inch diameter hole into the ground to depths typically ranging between about 6 to 25 feet below the ground surface. A stable bottom bulb is then formed by placing a layer of clean, crushed stone into the hole and ramming the stone using a patented specially designed, high- energy beveled tamper. Thin lifts of well-graded aggregate are then introduced into the hole and 382 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING FOR QUALITY AND STRENGTH 12 rammed with the tamper to from the remainder of the shaft. The result is a highly densified stiff element that is used to support the proposed structure. If a Geopier/Rammed Aggregate Piers foundation system is chosen to support the proposed building(s) we recommend contacting Mr. Charles Allgood of Ground Improvement Engineering for design and installation. Mr. Allgood can be reached at 763-416-2136. 5.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 5.1 Excavation The borings indicated that at the anticipated excavation depths the soils in the sidewalls of the excavations will be primarily Type B soil under Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) guidelines. Temporary excavations in Type B soils should be constructed at a minimum of 1 foot horizontal to every 1 foot vertical within excavations. 5.2 Observations A geotechnical engineer should observe the excavation subgrade to evaluate if the subgrade soils are similar to those encountered in the borings and adequate to support the proposed construction. 5.3 Backfill and Fills Site soils that will be excavated and reused as backfill and fill appear to be above their assumed optimum moisture content. We anticipate it will be necessary to moisture condition (dry) these soils to achieve the recommended compaction. We recommend that fill and backfill be placed in lifts not exceeding 4 to 12 inches, depending on the size of the compactor and materials used. 5.4 Testing We recommend density tests of backfill and fills placed for the new shrine. Samples of the proposed materials should be submitted to our laboratory prior to placement for evaluation of their suitability and to determine their optimum moisture content and maximum dry density (Standard Proctor). 5.5 Winter Construction If site grading and construction is anticipated to proceed during cold weather, all snow and ice should be removed from cut and fill areas prior to additional grading and placement of fill. No fill should be placed on frozen soil and no frozen soil should be used as fill or backfill. Concrete delivered to the site should meet the temperature requirements of ASTM and/or ACI. Concrete should not be placed on frozen soil. Concrete should be protected from freezing until 383 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING FOR QUALITY AND STRENGTH 13 the necessary strength is obtained. Frost should not be permitted to penetrate below the footings. 6.0 PROCEDURES 6.1 Soil Classification The drill crew chief visually and manually classified the soils encountered in the borings in general accordance with ASTM D 2488, “Description and Identification of Soils (Visual-Manual Procedure)”. Soil terminology notes are included in the Appendix. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review of the field classification by a soils engineer. Samples will be retained for a period of 30 days. 6.2 Groundwater Observations Immediately after taking the final samples in the bottom of the borings, the holes were checked for the presence of groundwater. Immediately after removing the augers from the borehole the holes were once again checked and the depth to water and cave-in depths were noted. 7.0 GENERAL 7.1 Subsurface Variations The analyses and recommendations presented in this report are based on data obtained from a limited number of soil borings. Variations can occur between and away from the borings, the nature of which may not become apparent until additional exploration work is completed or construction is conducted. A reevaluation of the recommendations in this report should be made after performing on-site observations during construction to note the characteristics of any variations. The variations may result in additional foundation costs and it is suggested that a contingency be provided for this purpose. It is recommended that we be retained to perform the observation and testing program during construction. This will allow correlation of the soil conditions encountered during construction to the soil borings and will provide continuity of professional responsibility. 7.2 Review of Design This report is based on the design of the proposed structure as related to us for preparation of this report. It is recommended that we be retained to review the geotechnical aspects of the design and specifications. With the review we will evaluate whether any changes have affected the validity of the recommendations and whether our recommendations have been correctly interpreted and implemented in the design and specifications. 384 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING FOR QUALITY AND STRENGTH 14 7.3 Groundwater Fluctuations We made water level measurements in the borings at the times and under the conditions stated on the boring logs. The data was interpreted in the text of this report. The period of observation was relatively short and fluctuations in the groundwater level may occur due to rainfall, flooding, irrigation, spring thaw, drainage, and other seasonal and annual factors not evident at the time the observations were made. Design drawings and specifications and construction planning should recognize the possibility of fluctuations. 7.4 Use of Report This report is for the exclusive use of RBSC Chanhassen LLC and their design team to use to design the proposed structure and prepare construction documents. In the absence of our written approval, we make no representation and assume no responsibility to other parties regarding this report. The data, analysis and recommendations may not be appropriate for other structures or purposes. We recommend that parties contemplating other structures or purposes contact us. 7.5 Level of Care Construction Engineering Laboratory has used the degree of skill and care ordinarily exercised under similar circumstance by members of the profession currently practicing in this locality. No warranty expressed or implied is made. 385 APPENDIX Boring Location Sketch Soil Boring Logs SB-1 thru SB-10 Descriptive Terminology 386 = Approximate Soil Boring Location Construction Engineering Laboratory 5661 International Parkway Minneapolis, MN Figure #: 1 Drawn By: PSG Date: 5/20/15 Scale: None CEL Project: L15034 Soil Boring Location Sketch Proposed Chanhassen Commercial Development NE Quadrant State Highway 5 & State Highway 101 Chanhassen, Minnesota ST-5 ST-6 SB-1 SB-4 ST-7 ST-8 SB-3 SB-2 SB-9 SB-10 387 (OL) Approximately 3 inches of Sandy Lean Clay with grass and root zone, Blackk to Dark brown, moist (TOPSOIL/FILL). (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, brown to dark brown, moist (FILL). Roots noted at about 5 feet (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, gray, moist to wet, rather stiff (GLACIAL TILL). (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, mottled brown and gray with black inclusions, wet, soft (GLACIAL TILL). (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, brown with rust stains, moist to wet, medium to very stiff (GLACIAL TILL). Bottom of borehole at 26.0 feet. AU 30 SS 31 SS 32 SS 33 SS 34 SS 35 SS 36 SS 37 SS 38 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 3-4-5 (9) 3-2-2 (4) 1-2-9 (11) 4-5-6 (11) 2-4-5 (9) 2-1-2 (3) 2-3-4 (7) 5-8-10 (18) 3 1/2 1/2 2 3 NOTES GROUND ELEVATION 956.2 ft LOGGED BY HGTS DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger and Split Spoon Sampler DRILLING CONTRACTOR Haugo Geotechnical Services GROUND WATER LEVELS: CHECKED BY PSG DATE STARTED 5/7/15 COMPLETED 5/7/15 AT TIME OF DRILLING 23.00 ft / Elev 933.20 ft AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered at 18 ft Cave-in Depth HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches FINES CONTENT (%) 20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80 PL LLMC DEPTH(ft)0 5 10 15 20 25 GRAPHICLOGMATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE TYPENUMBERRECOVERY %(RQD)BLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE)POCKET PEN.(tsf)DRY UNIT WT.(pcf) SPT N VALUE 20 40 60 80 PAGE 1 OF 1 BORING NUMBER SB-1 CLIENT RBSC Chanhassen LLC PROJECT NUMBER L-15034 PROJECT NAME Chanhassen Commercial Development PROJECT LOCATION Highway 5 and Highway 101, Chanhassen, MN GEOTECH BH PLOTS - GINT STD US LAB.GDT - 5/20/15 16:02 - C:\USERS\PUBLIC\DOCUMENTS\BENTLEY\GINT\PROJECTS\L-15034 CHANHASSEN RETAIL BUILDING.GPJConstruction Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 5661 International Parkway Minneapolis, MN 55428-3046 Telephone: (763) 533 9534 Fax: (763) 533 9586 388 (SM) Approximately 8 inches of Silty Sand and Gravel, brown, moist (AGGREGATE BASE). (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, dark brown to brown, moist (FILL). (OL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace roots and fibers, slightly organic, black, moist to wet (BURIED TOPSOIL). Organic Content = 2.8 % Organic Content = 3.1 % (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, gray, moist to wet, medium (GLACIAL TILL). (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, brown, moist to wet, rather stiff to stiff (GLACIAL TILL). Bottom of borehole at 26.0 feet. AU 39 SS 40 SS 41 SS 42 SS 43 SS 44 SS 45 SS 46 SS 47 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 0 100 3-3-4 (7) 2-3-5 (8) 2-4-6 (10) 4-6-7 (13) 3-4-5 (9) 3-4-4 (8) 2-4-5 (9) 5-6-7 (13) NOTES GROUND ELEVATION 959.3 ft LOGGED BY HGTS DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger and Split Spoon Sampler DRILLING CONTRACTOR Haugo Geotechnical Services GROUND WATER LEVELS: CHECKED BY PSG DATE STARTED 5/7/15 COMPLETED 5/7/15 AT TIME OF DRILLING 23.00 ft / Elev 936.30 ft AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered at 20 ft Cave-in Depth HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches FINES CONTENT (%) 20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80 PL LLMC DEPTH(ft)0 5 10 15 20 25 GRAPHICLOGMATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE TYPENUMBERRECOVERY %(RQD)BLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE)POCKET PEN.(tsf)DRY UNIT WT.(pcf) SPT N VALUE 20 40 60 80 PAGE 1 OF 1 BORING NUMBER SB-2 CLIENT RBSC Chanhassen LLC PROJECT NUMBER L-15034 PROJECT NAME Chanhassen Commercial Development PROJECT LOCATION Highway 5 and Highway 101, Chanhassen, MN GEOTECH BH PLOTS - GINT STD US LAB.GDT - 5/20/15 16:02 - C:\USERS\PUBLIC\DOCUMENTS\BENTLEY\GINT\PROJECTS\L-15034 CHANHASSEN RETAIL BUILDING.GPJConstruction Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 5661 International Parkway Minneapolis, MN 55428-3046 Telephone: (763) 533 9534 Fax: (763) 533 9586 389 (OL) Sandy Lean Clay with grass and root zone, slightly organic, black, moist to wet (TOPSOIL/FILL). (OL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace roots and fibers, slightly organic, black, moist to wet (TOPSOIL/BURIED TOPSOIL) Organic Content = 3.1 % Organic Content = 5.9 % (SP-SM) Poorly Graded Sand with Silt, fine to coarse grained with Gravel, brown to about 12 feet then gray, moist (FILL). Pieces of Concrete in the samples. (SP-SM) Poorly Graded Sand with Silt, fine to coarse grained with Gravel, black, waterbearing (FILL). Fuel/gasoline like odor noted in the sample. (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, gray, moist to wet, rather stiff (GLACIAL TILL). Bottom of borehole at 26.0 feet. AU 48 SS 49 SS 50 SS 51 SS 52 SS 53 SS 54 SS 55 SS 56 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 3-2-3 (5) 1-2-2 (4) 4-6-11 (17) 5-8-7 (15) 4-6-8 (14) 2-7-7 (14) 1-2-2 (4) 5-5-6 (11)1 NOTES GROUND ELEVATION 960 ft LOGGED BY HGTS DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger and Split Spoon Sampler DRILLING CONTRACTOR Haugo Geotechnical Services GROUND WATER LEVELS: CHECKED BY PSG DATE STARTED 5/7/15 COMPLETED 5/7/15 AT TIME OF DRILLING 20.00 ft / Elev 940.00 ft AT END OF DRILLING 19.00 ft / Elev 941.00 ft AFTER DRILLING --- HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches FINES CONTENT (%) 20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80 PL LLMC DEPTH(ft)0 5 10 15 20 25 GRAPHICLOGMATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE TYPENUMBERRECOVERY %(RQD)BLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE)POCKET PEN.(tsf)DRY UNIT WT.(pcf) SPT N VALUE 20 40 60 80 PAGE 1 OF 1 BORING NUMBER SB-3 CLIENT RBSC Chanhassen LLC PROJECT NUMBER L-15034 PROJECT NAME Chanhassen Commercial Development PROJECT LOCATION Highway 5 and Highway 101, Chanhassen, MN GEOTECH BH PLOTS - GINT STD US LAB.GDT - 5/20/15 16:02 - C:\USERS\PUBLIC\DOCUMENTS\BENTLEY\GINT\PROJECTS\L-15034 CHANHASSEN RETAIL BUILDING.GPJConstruction Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 5661 International Parkway Minneapolis, MN 55428-3046 Telephone: (763) 533 9534 Fax: (763) 533 9586 390 (CL) Approximately 2 inches of Sandy Lean Clay with Grass and Root zone, slightly organic, black, moist (TOPSOIL/FILL). (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, mostly black, moist to wet (FILL). Roots noted to about 5 feet (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, brown, moist, rather stiff to very stiff (GLACIAL TILL) Bottom of borehole at 26.0 feet. AU 57 SS 58 SS 59 SS 60 SS 61 SS 62 SS 63 SS 64 SS 65 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1-2-2 (4) 1-2-2 (4) 3-4-4 (8) 3-4-4 (8) 2-4-5 (9) 2-4-6 (10) 4-8-9 (17) 5-7-9 (16) NOTES GROUND ELEVATION 959.2 ft LOGGED BY HGTS DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger and Split Spoon Sampler DRILLING CONTRACTOR Haugo Geotechnical Services GROUND WATER LEVELS: CHECKED BY PSG DATE STARTED 5/7/15 COMPLETED 5/7/15 AT TIME OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered at 20 ft Cave-in Depth HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches FINES CONTENT (%) 20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80 PL LLMC DEPTH(ft)0 5 10 15 20 25 GRAPHICLOGMATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE TYPENUMBERRECOVERY %(RQD)BLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE)POCKET PEN.(tsf)DRY UNIT WT.(pcf) SPT N VALUE 20 40 60 80 PAGE 1 OF 1 BORING NUMBER SB-4 CLIENT RBSC Chanhassen LLC PROJECT NUMBER L-15034 PROJECT NAME Chanhassen Commercial Development PROJECT LOCATION Highway 5 and Highway 101, Chanhassen, MN GEOTECH BH PLOTS - GINT STD US LAB.GDT - 5/20/15 16:02 - C:\USERS\PUBLIC\DOCUMENTS\BENTLEY\GINT\PROJECTS\L-15034 CHANHASSEN RETAIL BUILDING.GPJConstruction Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 5661 International Parkway Minneapolis, MN 55428-3046 Telephone: (763) 533 9534 Fax: (763) 533 9586 391 (SM) Approximately 8 inches of Silty Sand and Gravel, brown, moist (AGGREGATE BASE). (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, darkk brown and black, moist to wet (FILL) Pieces of Concrete and Bituminous noted at about 7 1/2 feet. (OL) Sandy Lean Clay, slightly organic, black, moist to wet (BURIED TOPSOIL). (CL) Lean Clay, gray with black inclusions, moist to wet, medium (GLACIAL TILL). Bottom of borehole at 16.0 feet. AU 1 SS 2 SS 3 SS 4 SS 5 SS 6 SS 7 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 3-5-7 (12) 2-3-4 (7) 4-4-6 (10) 14-11-7 (18) 3-4-6 (10) 2-2-4 (6)1 1/2 NOTES GROUND ELEVATION 961.7 ft LOGGED BY HGTS DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger and Split Spoon Sampler DRILLING CONTRACTOR Haugo Geotechnical Services GROUND WATER LEVELS: CHECKED BY PSG DATE STARTED 5/7/15 COMPLETED 5/7/15 AT TIME OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered at 13 ft Cave-in Depth HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches FINES CONTENT (%) 20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80 PL LLMC DEPTH(ft)0 5 10 15 GRAPHICLOGMATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE TYPENUMBERRECOVERY %(RQD)BLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE)POCKET PEN.(tsf)DRY UNIT WT.(pcf) SPT N VALUE 20 40 60 80 PAGE 1 OF 1 BORING NUMBER SB-5 CLIENT RBSC Chanhassen LLC PROJECT NUMBER L-15034 PROJECT NAME Chanhassen Commercial Development PROJECT LOCATION Highway 5 and Highway 101, Chanhassen, MN GEOTECH BH PLOTS - GINT STD US LAB.GDT - 5/20/15 16:02 - C:\USERS\PUBLIC\DOCUMENTS\BENTLEY\GINT\PROJECTS\L-15034 CHANHASSEN RETAIL BUILDING.GPJConstruction Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 5661 International Parkway Minneapolis, MN 55428-3046 Telephone: (763) 533 9534 Fax: (763) 533 9586 392 (SM) Approximately 1 inch of Silty Sand and Gravel, brown, moist (AGGREGATE BASE). (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, brown and gray, moist to wet (FILL). Roots and fibers noted at about 5 feet. (OL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace roots and fibers, slightly organic, black, moist to wet (BURIED TOPSOIL). (CL) Lean Clay to Sandy Lean Clay, dark gray, moist to wet, stiff (GLACIAL TILL). Bottom of borehole at 13.5 feet. AU 18 SS 19 SS 20 SS 21 SS 22 SS 23 100 100 100 100 100 100 3-2-3 (5) 1-1-2 (3) 3-7-11 (18) 5-6-7 (13) 6-6-9 (15)1 1/2 NOTES GROUND ELEVATION 958 ft LOGGED BY HGTS DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger and Split Spoon Sampler DRILLING CONTRACTOR Haugo Geotechnical Services GROUND WATER LEVELS: CHECKED BY PSG DATE STARTED 5/7/15 COMPLETED 5/7/15 AT TIME OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches FINES CONTENT (%) 20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80 PL LLMC DEPTH(ft)0 5 10 GRAPHICLOGMATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE TYPENUMBERRECOVERY %(RQD)BLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE)POCKET PEN.(tsf)DRY UNIT WT.(pcf) SPT N VALUE 20 40 60 80 PAGE 1 OF 1 BORING NUMBER SB-6 CLIENT RBSC Chanhassen LLC PROJECT NUMBER L-15034 PROJECT NAME Chanhassen Commercial Development PROJECT LOCATION Highway 5 and Highway 101, Chanhassen, MN GEOTECH BH PLOTS - GINT STD US LAB.GDT - 5/20/15 16:02 - C:\USERS\PUBLIC\DOCUMENTS\BENTLEY\GINT\PROJECTS\L-15034 CHANHASSEN RETAIL BUILDING.GPJConstruction Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 5661 International Parkway Minneapolis, MN 55428-3046 Telephone: (763) 533 9534 Fax: (763) 533 9586 393 (CL) Approximately 3 inches of Sandy Lean Clay, with Grass and Root Zone, brown, moist (TOPSOIL/FILL). (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, brown, moist (FILL). (OL) Lean Clay, slightly organic, black, moist (BURIED TOPSOIL). (CL) Lean Clay, gray, moist to wet medium (GLACIAL TILL). Bottom of borehole at 13.5 feet. AU 24 SS 25 SS 26 SS 27 SS 28 SS 29 100 100 100 100 100 100 3-3-4 (7) 2-2-3 (5) 4-5-6 (11) 2-2-4 (6) 2-3-5 (8)1 1/2 NOTES GROUND ELEVATION 954.9 ft LOGGED BY HGTS DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger and Split Spoon Sampler DRILLING CONTRACTOR Haugo Geotechnical Services GROUND WATER LEVELS: CHECKED BY PSG DATE STARTED 5/7/15 COMPLETED 5/7/15 AT TIME OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered at 8 ft Cave-in Depth HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches FINES CONTENT (%) 20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80 PL LLMC DEPTH(ft)0 5 10 GRAPHICLOGMATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE TYPENUMBERRECOVERY %(RQD)BLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE)POCKET PEN.(tsf)DRY UNIT WT.(pcf) SPT N VALUE 20 40 60 80 PAGE 1 OF 1 BORING NUMBER SB-7 CLIENT RBSC Chanhassen LLC PROJECT NUMBER L-15034 PROJECT NAME Chanhassen Commercial Development PROJECT LOCATION Highway 5 and Highway 101, Chanhassen, MN GEOTECH BH PLOTS - GINT STD US LAB.GDT - 5/20/15 16:02 - C:\USERS\PUBLIC\DOCUMENTS\BENTLEY\GINT\PROJECTS\L-15034 CHANHASSEN RETAIL BUILDING.GPJConstruction Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 5661 International Parkway Minneapolis, MN 55428-3046 Telephone: (763) 533 9534 Fax: (763) 533 9586 394 (CL) Approximately 1 inch of Sandy Lean Clay, with Grass and Root Zone, dark brown, moist (TOPSOIL/FILL). (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, brown to dark brown, moist (FILL). (OL) Sandy Lean Clay with wood and roots, slightly organic, black, moist (BURIED TOPSOIL). (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, black and gray, wet (FILL). (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, brown, moist, rather stiff (GLACIAL TILL). Bottom of borehole at 16.0 feet. AU 66 SS 67 SS 68 SS 69 SS 70 SS 71 SS 72 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 4-4-4 (8) 2-3-4 (7) 3-4-5 (9) 2-4-6 (10) 1-2-2 (4) 2-6-6 (12) NOTES GROUND ELEVATION 952.7 ft LOGGED BY HGTS DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger and Split Spoon Sampler DRILLING CONTRACTOR Haugo Geotechnical Services GROUND WATER LEVELS: CHECKED BY PSG DATE STARTED 5/7/15 COMPLETED 5/7/15 AT TIME OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered at 12 ft Cave-in Depth HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches FINES CONTENT (%) 20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80 PL LLMC DEPTH(ft)0 5 10 15 GRAPHICLOGMATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE TYPENUMBERRECOVERY %(RQD)BLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE)POCKET PEN.(tsf)DRY UNIT WT.(pcf) SPT N VALUE 20 40 60 80 PAGE 1 OF 1 BORING NUMBER SB-8 CLIENT RBSC Chanhassen LLC PROJECT NUMBER L-15034 PROJECT NAME Chanhassen Commercial Development PROJECT LOCATION Highway 5 and Highway 101, Chanhassen, MN GEOTECH BH PLOTS - GINT STD US LAB.GDT - 5/20/15 16:02 - C:\USERS\PUBLIC\DOCUMENTS\BENTLEY\GINT\PROJECTS\L-15034 CHANHASSEN RETAIL BUILDING.GPJConstruction Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 5661 International Parkway Minneapolis, MN 55428-3046 Telephone: (763) 533 9534 Fax: (763) 533 9586 395 (CL) Approximately 3 inches of Sandy Lean Clay, with Grass and Root Zone, brown, moist (TOPSOIL/FILL). (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, mostly black and dark gray, moist to wet (FILL) Roots and fibers noted at about 10 feet. Bottom of borehole at 11.0 feet. AU 13 SS 14 SS 15 SS 16 SS 17 100 100 100 100 100 3-1-3 (4) 1-3-1 (4) 1-3-4 (7) 1-2-3 (5) NOTES GROUND ELEVATION 955.4 ft LOGGED BY HGTS DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger and Split Spoon Sampler DRILLING CONTRACTOR Haugo Geotechnical Services GROUND WATER LEVELS: CHECKED BY PSG DATE STARTED 5/7/15 COMPLETED 5/7/15 AT TIME OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered at 6 ft Cave-in Depth HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches FINES CONTENT (%) 20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80 PL LLMC DEPTH(ft)0 5 10 GRAPHICLOGMATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE TYPENUMBERRECOVERY %(RQD)BLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE)POCKET PEN.(tsf)DRY UNIT WT.(pcf) SPT N VALUE 20 40 60 80 PAGE 1 OF 1 BORING NUMBER SB-9 CLIENT RBSC Chanhassen LLC PROJECT NUMBER L-15034 PROJECT NAME Chanhassen Commercial Development PROJECT LOCATION Highway 5 and Highway 101, Chanhassen, MN GEOTECH BH PLOTS - GINT STD US LAB.GDT - 5/20/15 16:02 - C:\USERS\PUBLIC\DOCUMENTS\BENTLEY\GINT\PROJECTS\L-15034 CHANHASSEN RETAIL BUILDING.GPJConstruction Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 5661 International Parkway Minneapolis, MN 55428-3046 Telephone: (763) 533 9534 Fax: (763) 533 9586 396 (CL) Approximately 6 inches of Sandy Lean Clay, with Grass and Root Zone, slightly organic, black, moist (TOPSOIL/FILL). (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, brown, dark brown and gray, moist to wet (FILL). Bottom of borehole at 11.0 feet. AU 8 SS 9 SS 10 SS 11 SS 12 100 100 100 100 100 2-2-2 (4) 1-2-1 (3) 1-3-4 (7) 3-4-5 (9) NOTES GROUND ELEVATION 955.8 ft LOGGED BY HGTS DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger and Split Spoon Sampler DRILLING CONTRACTOR Haugo Geotechnical Services GROUND WATER LEVELS: CHECKED BY PSG DATE STARTED 5/7/15 COMPLETED 5/7/15 AT TIME OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches FINES CONTENT (%) 20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80 PL LLMC DEPTH(ft)0 5 10 GRAPHICLOGMATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE TYPENUMBERRECOVERY %(RQD)BLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE)POCKET PEN.(tsf)DRY UNIT WT.(pcf) SPT N VALUE 20 40 60 80 PAGE 1 OF 1 BORING NUMBER SB-10 CLIENT RBSC Chanhassen LLC PROJECT NUMBER L-15034 PROJECT NAME Chanhassen Commercial Development PROJECT LOCATION Highway 5 and Highway 101, Chanhassen, MN GEOTECH BH PLOTS - GINT STD US LAB.GDT - 5/20/15 16:02 - C:\USERS\PUBLIC\DOCUMENTS\BENTLEY\GINT\PROJECTS\L-15034 CHANHASSEN RETAIL BUILDING.GPJConstruction Engineering Laboratory, Inc. 5661 International Parkway Minneapolis, MN 55428-3046 Telephone: (763) 533 9534 Fax: (763) 533 9586 397 398 399