Loading...
B Reconstruction of Lyman Blvd. CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us ~ MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Justin Miller, Assistant City Manager~ ~I' \J '" "" FROM: DATE: October 3,2005 RE: Chanhassen West Business Park Abatement District BACKGROUND In 1997, the State of Minnesota made available to local governments an economic development tool known as tax abatement. Similar to Tax Increment Financing (TIP), property taxes from a property or set of properties can be used for economic development purposes, such as infrastructure improvements, developer incentives, or special assessment paYments, just to name a few. The main difference between TIP and tax abatement is that each taxing jurisdiction (cities, counties, and school districts) can decide whether they would like to participate in the project. In the coming years, Lyman Boulevard from Audubon Road to Highway 41 will need to be upgraded. Funding for this project has yet to be identified, but staff believes that an abatement district incorporating the recently approved Chanhassen West Business Park may provide substantial funding for this project while limiting the burden on current taxpayers. How It Works An abatement district would be identified, in this case it would be the 40 acre parcel recently approved by the City of Chanhassen as the Chanhassen West Business Park. A public hearing would need to be held at each level of government proposed to participate in the program. If all three jurisdictions participate, the district can last up to 15 years. If any jurisdiction does not participate, the abatement district can last up to 20 years. The district can be set up in a variety of ways. The entire amount of taxes can be abated, or a dedicated portion (such as the new taxes collected, or increment) can be dedicated. In any case, the property owner pays their taxes as they normally would, but the use of the money would be designated for a specific purpose. Unlike TIP, money can be collected up front and remain in an account for a period of time without necessarily having to be expended. This way, collection could begin immediately, but the project could wait until enough money was in the account to construct the project. Also, abatement bonds could be issued, which would allow for immediate construction, while pledging the future taxes from the abatement district towards debt service on the project. The City of Chanhassen · A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. Chanhassen West Business Park Anal vsis Staff and Ehlers and Associates have completed a preliminary analysis of the potential abatement prospects on the Chanhassen West Business Park. After the business park is fully developed, our calculations are as follows: Maximum Abatement with Fiscal Disparities 28.118% 44.107% 33.299% Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot4. Jot.5. LotS Lot 7 Lot 8 Fiscal Building Disparities Square Market Market Class. Local Tax Tax F'C)C)ttl9f! Value/sf. Value . Rate . c:tlPtl~~.C:ClPClC~ 50,265 $ 50.00 $ 2,513,250. 2% ',$ 39,612$ 9,903 46,982 . $ 50.00 . $ 2,349.100 > 20,4 '$ 36.986 ' $ 9.246 27,89€)l$().()()ill;~~.$$() 2% ....$~1,719I$ 5,430 40,526 , $ 50.00 . $ 2.026,300 2% $ 31,821 . $ 7,955 41.f:?I:I!:Jl!)().()()l~.()84,4!)()m 2% $ 32,751 · $ 1:1,188 77,754 . $ 50.00' $ 3,887.700' 2% $ 61,S03 '$ 15,401 ?~,J~4 $ !)O,OO $ 1,1,56,200?% $ 17,899 $ 4,475 25,914 $ 50,00 . $ 1,295,700 2% $ 20,131 . $ 5,033 334,153 c:~ PC)rtlC)nc:C)untyFtortlc)l1~chool Portion $ 13,923 . $ 21,840 $ 16,488 $ 13,000 . $ 20,392 $ 15.395 $ 7,634 ' $ 1);975$ 9,040 $ 11.184'$ 17,544:$ 13,245 $ 11,511' $ 18.057. $ 13.632 $ 21,652 . $ 33.964 . $ 25.642 $ 6,291 . $ 9,869 ' $ 7,450 $ 7,07S' $ 11,099 '$ 8.379 $ 92270 . $ 144,738 $ 109272 Maximum Annual Amoul'lt Availa])le9f'1~~AII Properties are. Developed $ 346.280 Engineering staff, in consultation with Carver County, have estimated the cost of upgrading Lyman Boulevard in 2007. Below is a potential scenario that would allow for this upgrade: ,LYIlliln Boulevard Upgrade Us.. t.1ainLinf3lrYlprClVE!lllf3rlt~frornpo\lfers to 'TH41 , $ Lyman Blvd.lAudubonRoad Intersection i $ [GalpinEli\ttl,lrllf3rsf3c:tiorl l $ 'TH41.lrltf3.rsf3.c:tillfllrnprovellleflt~ , $ 16. Watermain along Lyman from Galpin to Audubon . $ 12'X12'ElllxCulvertc:rossingLYlllan..Btvd:...for Trail $ Street Ughting $ Storm Sewer from Powers to TH 41 $ 10' Trail on North Side of Lyman from Powers to Chanhassen City Umits . Includes some retaining wall! co~s $ Subtotal S 3,339.(0) friJ.OO) 500 ,(0) 350,lm 660 ,(0) 350 ,(0) 400 .(0) 1 ,500 ,lm Source. A/l.~te.fl'lentDi~trict ($:3fi(),(XIllyrfor12years) 2005 MUSA Assessment Storm Water Fund $ 4,200 ,(0) '$ 1 ,OO),lXII 660 ,(0) S 1 ,500 ,(0) Water Fund 500 ,(0) 6,399,cril ,&,ssurne:2C.Q7 c:onstructionCost'With4%lnflationlyeanS !3,~,~ Final Cost ; s 9,084,358 c:ityof Chaska(~ontribution Carver County Contribution 431 ,(0) 1 ,DJ ,(0) 9,091.000 Under this scenario, taxes on these properties would be directed towards upgrading Lyman Boulevard for twelve years (the maximum would be 15 or 20 years). Some of the improvements are water and storm water related, therefore using these enterprise funds is justified. The master road agreement from 1994 also spells out the funding levels of Chaska and Carver County. Staff believes that tax abatement would work in this situation for several reasons. First of all, upgrading Lyman Boulevard will benefit each of the taxing jurisdictions involved. Lyman is a county road, and it will need upgrading due to the construction of a secondary school in the vicinity. Additionally, since this is a relatively undeveloped 40 acre parcel, capturing the growth in taxes paid will be easier for city, county and school district budgets to absorb since it is not already being used for operating expenses. RECOMMENDA TION If the city council wishes to investigate this further, the next steps would be to formally introduce to issue to Carver County and School District 112 and ask Ehlers and Associates to begin preparing financial projections for the project.