4 Consider Fast Food Restaurants without a Drive-Thru in a BN
'0 City Center Drive, PO Box 141 FROM:
':hanhassen, Minnesota 55317
Phone 612,9371900 DA TE:
General hlx 612.9375139
:/Igineering Fax 612.9379152 SUBJ:
lIb/ic Safe0' Fax 612,934.2524
Xleb lI'II'III,Ci. cbanhm,'eJl. 11I11. liS
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Don Ashworth, City Manager
2~
:'iZJ' o{C/;r1nlJilsJi'n, A growing cOillilluni0' with dean lakc." qllli/itJ'SelIOO!i, II elJilIming downtolu/I, thri/ling bmine.r.res, and beilliti{td park'S, A glt'llt pllh'e to lil'i'. lI'ork, and plil)'
Cynthia Kirchoff, Planner I
January 21, 1998
Amend Section 20-694 to include fast food restaurants without
drive-through windows as p31i of a shopping center as a
conditional uSl;in the BN, Neighborhood Business District and a
request for cori~ditional use permit #97-6 for the operation of
Domino's Pizza at 2407 W, Hwy. 7 (7 & 41 Crossings)
PROPOSAL
/
Ed Carr of Domino's Pizza is requesting a zoning ordinance amendment to allow
fast food restaurants without drive-through windows as a conditional use in the
BN, Neighborhood Business District. Currently, fast food restaurants are not
permitted in the BN Dish'ict. This amendment will allow customers to eat the
food at the restaurant, carry-out the food or have it delivered. There is also a
request for a conditional use pemlit to allow Domino's to locate at 2407 W. Hwy.
7 (7 & 41 Crossings). This development is zoned BN, Neighborhood Business.
PLANNING COMMISSION UPDATE
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 7, 1998 to
review the zoning ordinance amendment and the conditional use permit.
Both applications were approved. At this meeting several issues were
discussed. One issue was the hours of operation. The other issue was why
Subway is located in the development when fast food restaurants are
prohibited in the BN district.
Since staff restricted the hours of Domino's Pizza to be from 8 a.m. to
midnight, the Planning Commission was concerned with the hours of other
establishments in the development. Staff surveyed the other tenants' hours.
The following are the closing times, according to posted hours.
,~
7 & 41 Crossings
TENANT
Jerry's Floor Store
Career Cleaners
CLOSES AT
9:00 p.m. (M-F)
7 :00 p.m.
Amendment to Section 20-694
January 21, 1998
Page 2
Happy Garden II
Pet Clips
Hair Salon
Video Update
Subway
Young America
(Office Use)
Super America
10:00 p.m. (F,S)
6:00 p.m.
No hours posted
12:00 a.m.
10:00 p.m. (S-Th); 11:00 p.m. (F,S)
No hours posted
11:00 p.m.*
*Their CUP allows them to operate until midnight.
The Planning Commi~sion did concur with staff on the restricted hours because they felt
this neighborhood would not demand hours 'later than midnight. The hours of adjacent
tenants clearly support this notion.
According to building permit records, Subway has been at 7 & 41 Crossings since 1990.
This is a non-conforming operation since fast food restaurants are not permitted in the BN
district. They will not be allowed to expand, nor will another fast food restaurant be
permitted to occupy this space in the future without a conditional use permit.
BACKGROUND
The BN, Neighborhood Business district intends to provide "low intensity neighborhood retail
and service establishments to meet daily needs of residents." The following are some of the
permitted uses in this district: convenience stores without gas pumps, neighborhood oriented.
retail shops, dry cleaners, personal services, professional offices and health services.
The conditional uses in this district are:
1. convenience store with gas pumps
2. drive-in banks including automated kiosks
3. standard restaurants
4. bed and breakfast establishments.
Although these uses will serve the needs of the neighborhood, they will create additional traffic.
This traffic and othe~concems (i.e., parking, lighting, noise, hours of operation, etc.) warrant the
need for the conditional use permit.
Amendment to Section 20-694
January 21, 1998
Page 3
The City Code differentiates between standard and fast food restaurants. Standard restaurants are
a conditional use in this district but are permitted in the BH, CBD and BG districts. In this type
of restaurant the food and beverages are served by an employee and they are consumed within the
building. Whereas, the fast food restaurant "means an establishment whose principal business is
the sale of food and/or beverages in a ready-to-consume state for consumption:
1. Within restaurant building;
2. Within a motor vehicle parked on the premises; or
3. Off the premises as carry-out orders;
and whose principal method of operation includes the following characteristics:
a. Food and/or beverages are usually packaged prior to sale and are served in edible containers
or in paper, plastic or other disposable containers;
b. The customer is not served food at his table by an employee, but receives it at a counter
window, or similar facility and carries it to another location on or off the premises for
consumption. "
Fast food restaurants are not permitted nor are they a conditional use in the BN district. They
are, however, permitted in the BH, Highway Business, and BG, General Business Districts. In
the CBD, Central Business District, they are a permitted use if they are part of a shopping center,
but are a conditional use if they are free standing.
ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
ANALYSIS
The amendment limits the type of restaurant to fast food without a drive-through and the location
as being part of a shopping center in order to maintain the intent of the district. A restaurant
without a drive-through window located in a shopping center will not create the traffic as a
"traditional" fast food restaurant in a free standing building. This will still allow those
neighboring residents to enjoy such services without altering the character of the neighborhood.
This use may also fill in a service void that may exist in that area of the City.
This type of use would serve the residents ofthe surrounding residential developments.
Customers could consume the food at the restaurant, pick it up or have it delivered by an
employee. Being this request is specifically for Domino's, the use would not substantially
increase traffic because many of the customers would not be traveling to the restaurant.
However, if the tenant would change to a more intense fast food restaurant, more issues may
surface. This is the basis for the requirement for the conditional use permit.
Amendment to Section 20-694
January 21, 1998
Page 4
Staff believes a conditional use permit should be required because a fast food restaurant without
a drive-through will still increase vehicular movements and affect the intentofthe district.
Although the amendment was requested by Domino's, who only deliver pizza, it could change to
a more intense user. Therefore, staff would like to protect the intent of the district by requiring a
permit.
Staff recommends approval of the zoning ordinance amendment to allow fast food restaurants
without drive-through windows as part of a shopping center as a conditional use permit in the BN
district.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
ANAL YSIS
The conditional use permit would allow Domino's Pizza to locate in an existing shopping center.
This operation will deliver the pizza, so the customer would have no need to travel to Domino's.
However, the customer does have the option to pick-up the pizza. These customers intend to
be within 1 to 112 miles of the restaurant. Staff does believe that this service will be a benefit for
those residents in the northern portion of the City.
The applicant is requesting that Domino's be permitted to operate until 2 a.m. on Friday
and Saturday. Staff believes that the hours should be restricted to midnight because this
operation is located near a residential area. Also, no other tenant has hours past midnight.
Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit to allow Domino's to operate a
restaurant without a drive-through at 2407 W. Hwy. 7.
FINDINGS
The Planning Commission shall recommend a conditional use permit and the council shall issue
such conditional use permits only if it finds that such use at the proposed location:
1. Will not be detrimental to or damage the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general
welfare of the neighborhood of the city.
Finding:
The restaurant will not be detrimental to or damage the public health, safety,
comfort and general welfare of the community. This will enable residents in
the northern part of the City to have this service.
2. Will be consistent with the objectives of the city's comprehensive plan and this chapter.
Amendment to Section 20-694
January 21, 1998
Page 5
Finding:
This area of the City is guided medium density residential. As part of the current
comprehensive plan amendment staff intends to change the land use to commercial
to make it consistent. Staff believes that the proposal will be consistent with the
objectives of the comprehensive plan.
3. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so to be compatible in appearance with
the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential
character of that area.
Finding:
The applicant will not alter the exterior of the eXlstmg building but interior
remodeling will take place. However, a building permit is required prior to the
restaurant locating in the shopping center.
4. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or planned neighboring uses.
Finding:
The restaurant will not be hazardous to existing or planned neighborhood uses.
5. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police
and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools;
or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies
responsible for the establishment of the proposed use.
Finding:
The restaurant will be served adequately by public facilities and services.
6. Will not create excessive requirements for public facilities and services and will not be
detrimental to the economic welfare of the community.
Finding:
The proposal will not create excessive requirements for public facilities and services
and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community.
7. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and condition of operation that
will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive
production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, rodents, or trash.
Finding:
The restaurant will not be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare
because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors,
rodents or trash. Hours of operation will be from 8:00 a.m. to midnight.
8. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which do not create traffic congestion or
interfere with traffic or surrounding public thoroughfares.
Amendment to Section 20-694
January 21, 1998
Page 6
Finding:
The proposal has vehicular approaches to the property which do not create traffic
congestion or interfere with traffic surrounding public thoroughfares. Access will
be gained through the existing driveway.
9. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of solar access, natural, scenic or historic
features of major significance.
Finding:
The restaurant location will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of solar
access, natural, scenic or historic features of major significance.
10. Will be aesthetically compatible with the area.
Finding: Since the exterior of the existing building will not be altered, the restaurant will be
aesthetically compatible with the area.
11. Will not depreciate surrounding property values.
Finding:
The proposal will not depreciate surrounding property values.
12. Will meet standards prescribed for certain uses as provided in this article.
Finding:
The proposal meets the standards provided in this article.
RECOMMENDA TIONS
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motions:
"The Planning Commission recommends approval of the amendment to Section 20-694 to permit
fast food restaurants without drive-through windows as part of a shopping center (not a free
standing building) as a conditional use in the BN, Neighborhood Business district."
"The Planning Commission recommends approval for conditional use permit #97-6 for the
operation of Domino's Pizza, located at 2407 W. Hwy. 7 (7 & 41 Crossings), based upon the
findings presented in the staff report and with the following conditions:
1. All signage must comply with the City Code.
2. The operation shall comply with all conditions of site plan review #86-2.
3. The hours of operation shall be from 8 a.m. to 12 :00 a.m.
Amendment to Section 20-694
January 21, 1998
Page 7
4. The applicant shall obtain a building permit for the interior remodeling."
A TT ACHMENTS
1. Application
2. Section 20-691, BN District Requirements
3. Site Plan
4. Site Plan Review #86-2 Conditions of Approval
5. Property Owners
6. Minutes from the January 7, 1998 Planning Commission Meeting
Ilcts I IvoI2Iplanlcklzoabn.fastfood.doc
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
(612) 937-1900
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
~---
DEe 0 8 1997
CHANh/'lvvc;" l"'l.r\m~II~U LJtPT
OWNER:
-
Mf.,t..-IAM C'1I,e1(
ADDRESS: .rj '12- ~IRI > nt- ~N
fi11A.1AiErt:J/fI~, /rltJ S
. ,
TELEPHONE: 9.J.1- 2 '2..d 0
APPUCANT:
ADDRESS: I
TELEPHONE (Day time)
?Js-
_ Comprehensive Plan Amendment _ Temporary Sales Permit
L Conditional Use Permit - Vacation of ROW/Easements
- Interim Use Permit - Variance
_ Non-conforming Use Permit - Wetland Alteration Permit
_ Planned Unit Development" _ Zoning Appeal
_ Rezoning _ Zoning Ordinance Amendment
_ Sign Permits
_ Sign Plan Review _ Notification Sign
- Site Plan Review" -2L Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost*"
($50 CUP/SPRlYACNARlWAP/Metes
and Bounds. $400 Minor SUB)
- Subdivision" TOTAL FEE $ 4OD. OQ
A list of all property owners within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must be included with the
application.
Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews.
"'Twenty-six full size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8W' X 11" reduced copy of
transparency for each plan sheet.
- Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract
NOTE - When multiple applications are processed. the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application.
PROJECT NAME l>OM~~' ~
LOCATION 2cto7 vi. UJY
821..ft
1 (1~ 'II ~;fO->>I/'IC
C EN-re-,e)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
TOTAL ACREAGE
WETlANDS PRESENT
PRESENT ZONING
REQUESTED ZONING
PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION
REQUESTED lAND USE DESIGNATION
REASONFORTHISREQUEST A c..&\1d.rhCV1ClI us.Q., ~It fzv tViG Dp-c..rz;rh (Jy)
vf €A fvst foDe\ restcLuro..n t ,
YES
NO
This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information
and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning
Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application.
A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within ten business days of application submittal. A written
notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within ten business days of application.
This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with
all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom
the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either
copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make
this application and the fee owner has also signed this application.
1 will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further
understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any
authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge.
The city hereby notifies the applicant that development review cannot be completed within 60 days due to public hearing
requirements and agency review. Therefore, the city is notifying the applicant that the city requires an automatic 60 day
extension for development review. Development review shall be completed within 120 days unless additional review
~edbYfap~ /.2--g/1?
Signature of Applicant Date
Signature of Fee Owner
Appfication Received on 11-I'bf Qr; Fee Paid ~4{)8 .ceo
Date
Receipt No.
8-000
The appTIcant should contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Friday prior to the meeting.
If not contacted, a copy of the report will be mailed to the applicant's address.
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
(612) 937-1900
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION
~TY.OF~~
RECEIVElD'
DEe 03 1997
CHAl'4n"'''''C:I~ r-LJ'\I.ml~1.1 ut:.PT
APPUCANT: \:::NI'--\ \ 1=t--L (--:.fa.---N~
ADDRESS: ?be k~+~t; i ~(' _'
~5:; ~ WC>.'1 ~ 'bl06 'S\..); k I c:::.P
. t. ,- _ l
"-\...\.!""\~ <\~ l \ ~ ({'.".r'~ ~S '1 J <...0
TELEPHONE (Day time) lc I ). - so, ,. d;}~ C'l
OWNER: I) _1. L/ \ CfDSS.~,,~ C&-'XlfL
J.-I.... ~ ~ ~1v--U.Q.. ~p ,
ADDRESS:
<6Ut
TELEPHONE: (1'11-. -Sg I, ad~Q
_ Comprehensive Plan Amendment _ Temporary Sales Permit
- Conditional Use Permit - Vacation of ROW/Easements
- Interim Use Permit - Variance
_ Non-conforming Use Permit - Wetland Alteration Permit
_ Planned Unit Development" _ Zoning Appeal
_ Rezoning L Zoning Ordinance Amendment
_ Sign Permits
_ Sign Plan Review _ Notification Sign
- Site Plan Review" -2L Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost....
($50 CUP/SPAN ACN AR/W AP/Metes
and Bounds, $400 Minor SUB)
- Subdivision" TOTALFEE$ 500.00
A Ost of all property owners within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must be included with the
application.
Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. N<--':: /'J.~ bO\L.;:'I"-l1o 1~\0'::"~c.~.
"'Twenty-six full size ~ copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8%" X 11" reduced copy of
transparency for each plan sheet.
- Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract
NOlE - When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application.
f'ROJECTNAME '} ct y \ C,rc,ss,'lC--S CQ21\..-l ~--L
LOCATION ~" --t-;",G...L.,t- C !-r.~.,.- u:: ~ ,f)-k~c.CiJc---. G~ t-k~}\~ ':-, ., ~ 'll
LEGAl DESCRIPTION 'Tt~ ~ ATI<<Jyd.
TOTAL ACREAGE :) &:>. C'Lt <"F cL :; . db /lC2~~ .
WETlANDS PRESENT YES ~ NO
PRESENT ZONING ~L \ (-h!.-:x.v~:.C\. ?-X. ~ --.,L.--,~ (6i"-! ')
REQUESTED ZONING '-D.u.r-- kc.,~ (J/nc'.--y::t" I)' -k, C"--~
PRESENT lAND USE DESIGNATION
C.{-fYlr'"'('-(<('~\ /~iG
,
6,-~~-\.
.--
REQUESTED lAND USE DESIGNATION -6:-'\l..i.~ A<.... /\ \~-( -.?
REASON FOR THIS REQUESTL-,~\ \ i)h Cl~: .UA l (C~ L\~ f-::-'--t ffi ,-f?N T iZc:: l~ ~IE"'I\ l\:)
,LLC~,~ c:;c:..., RCL~ ~\.~ r."h0--\c ft <-...:.:.;1\('\t.G-I-a dv;'-.i - n--rC::;L.C:.~ ~I,\CC\:::.~.
;t)':,. '- ..:..c.c..)....'-.\ c\ (-1-.LL~c..::::, ~r 0...",;,,-.(.':,. p; 22(_.-tc; J-yc...-.:~ C./i ;.I'l~.""1Z- -K-~,T.
This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information
and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning
Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application.
A detennination of completeness of the application shall be made within ten business days of application submittal. A written
notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within ten business days of application.
This is 10 certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with
all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom
the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either
copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make
this application and the fee owner has also signed this application.
1 will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further
understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any
authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge..
The city hereby notifies the applicant that development review cannot be completed within 60 days due to public hearing
requirements and agency review. Therefore, the city is notifying the applicant that the city requires an automatic 60 day
extension for development review. Development review shall be completed within 120 days unless additional review
extensions are approved by the applicant.
~/( /L, ,1- If (,--(..J___~
~i~jlafUre q! ~plicant ':t:A:"I~:'-'. 1A::~ H ~b'l::l:i'_(E
AI, --- -/ ,~ ~
'-"(.,<..'~ _e:-r~~.
Signature of Fee Owner
Application Received on I ~I 3 ( Cf '7 Fee Paid 4t. 5W. 00
/J ;}(J/
Date
Date
Receipt No.
The appTIcant should contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Friday prior to the meeting.
Jf not contacted, a copy of the report will be mailed to the applicant's address.
t
I
~
[I L
I ..
:t:
FJ
f z
l? ~'
...
.c:.
-
C/)
rr ,. ~
-
t >
l\~ z
November 17, 1997
l11s. Nancy Mancino
6620 G.7lpin Blvd
ExcelsiOl~ IIJN 55331
RE: 7 &- 41 Crossings Shopping Center
Chanhassen, 111N 55331
Dear l\.1ayor Mancino,
I am 'writing on behalf of the Ol-vner of the above referenced shopping
center and 1111: Ed Can~ owner of Bloomington Pizza which operates as
Dominos Pizza. As you are most llkelyaware, Dominos Pizza is a pizza de/ive1Y
business which operates pninaJily from strip centers located 1iI the
neighborhoods which they service. M1: Ca1T recently opened another D0l1lliI0S
Pizz.7 location 1n Chanhassen located near Highway 5 and whose appearance
and operating practices have been exemplary. Ml: Carr and the Landlord have
come to an agreement of terms whereby l\.1r. Carr would open a second location
at the above referenced location 1n Chanhassen, pninanJy to senrice the homes
v.'ithin one and one half nllJes of 7 &- 41 Cross1iIgS. Dunng the process of
Ivorbilg with planmng staffit became clear to the sUlprise of al~ that a pizz(7
de]jve1Y business is strangely precluded from tenancy at thLc; center due to the
current neighborhood busJiIess ZOl11iIg. The pizza delive1)' bus1iIess is a
common tenant witllliI ShOppJiIg centeJ:<i sJimJm' to 7 &41 Cl'"OSSJilgS, however; it
1~' not uncomm:JJ1 for zoning to call fLy a special use pennit. ~Fe dl1not belie'l"e
the' origi17.7l intent of the current zoning was to preclude this particular (vpe of
temmt, but to contJ"Ol fast food types of tenants. Dominos Pizza would jj't
apprDpriate~v with other allowable uses outlined in the zoning ,md it would
seem most appropnate to add this classijjcation, Pizza De/ive1y, to the other
cJass1jj'cat1~1J1s reqllJi1iIg a special use pennit rather than to rezone the ce11fe1:
EL1th the Landlord and 11-11: Ca1T have enjoyed positive expeJiences worbilS with
the City ol Chanlwssen 1n the past, and we look fOl1wmi to working with YOil
tow.m.t a common solution to this surpnsJiIg complkatio17.
1...,';', ;.,.;,\
J h.71'e attached a copy of the Zol11ilg code 1il question lor your review as well
as a site plan indie,,7tinS the desJi-ed location fLy the store. J would be pleased to
.711swer any questions Wl11dl you nwy have or pronde .vou with addit1t1J1al
in[01111.1ti011. l1wJ1k you in advance lor your attenti{)j] to tl11s matte1:
,. " '\'" !)".-.,
\'. .',-;~. .:,' '..
Si];cere~l-~
p~
"'-""
t:.' :(~ ~: _,~;: l~ 'I ,~';'": ~
....... 'br ir;;;.... ,:.. ~:.~C
K~
CI)
B~
E--
CI)
W
>
Z
1"""" ~ I ~ rl ..,
'~J , '1 '~7
- ~ '~:
v..;
November 18, 1997
C'-'
IIYCrC-:""
, 11-.. ..." -'#-~"'~c.r\j
Ms. Kate Aaneson
Director of Planning
City of Chanhassen
690 CouItier Drive
Chanhassen, MN 55317
RE: 7 &41 Crossing Shopping Center
Chanhassen, Minnesota
Dear Ms. Aaneson,
Attached please find a copy of the letter that was sent to Mayor Mancino
and the four members of the City Council indicating the desire of Domino's
Pizza to locate a second store In Chanhassen at the above referenced center and
the problem that exists relative to the current EN ZOfllng as pOinted out by your
staff As Indicated In the attached letter, we hope consIderation may be given to
adding this specific use to those categories outlined under the conditional use
section of the zoning rather then to require the rezofllng of the property which
would give much broader rights relative to permitted uses than necessary or
desired
It is our hope that this solution may be acceptable allOWIng us to proceed
with Mr. Ed Carr, the owner of the business. Thank you for any conSIderation
you may prOVIde in this matter.
SInCerelY,
Suite 1050
Minneapolis
Minnesota
55416
Phone
612-591-2260
Fax
612-591-2231
("')
:r:
~ '"'-J
Z
...,... l?='
-
~ ,l:;..
(\J (f) -
511 (f) ("')
)>
'"'-J Z ::0
OJ 0
OJ 3: (f) f~
(f) - (f)
tD :z -
:z
~ :z 0 VI :;:
t:rJ U'1
(f) t'1"J C en
(f) "" 0
::0 ~ is
0 ("') < ,.
~ tTJ () :n -< :j
~ :z r-r;
;:0
c.n ...., 0
c.n tTJ .;.. <
w ::0 '=' ) 0
l'Tl
W 0 (J
;Q
- C is
." is
0
,.
-l :j
l'Tl
I
r--WJ
-3
~l I
l
8J
tjJ
.;.
(,."
is
."
...
Vl
:!
o
^
l'Tl
'"
v;
o
'"
2 ;;
-l ::c
,. ;;r::
r- :2
~ C)
Vl r-
:;; ~
c
~
Z
-i
-<
o
c
z
C)
,.
:!
l'Tl
'"
~
:I:
~
'"
Vl
,.
r-
o
Z
z
~-+
U'1
~
,',
;;::;
.;..
?:
",
..
.
Ci ty of Chanhassen It\TT^C1t~/f t::.NT q-
Carver and Hennepin Counties, Minnesota
In the matter of Chanhassen Planning Case : 86-2 Site Plan Review
Own e r: Seven Forty One Partnership
Applicant: lbger Zahn
Street Address:
P. I . N .: 25-7940020
Legal Description: Lot 2, Block 1, Seven-Forty One Crossing
Purpose: Approval of retail shopping center.
Z on in g D i s t r i c t : BN, Neighborhood Business District
'I'he above en ti tIed matter was heard before the Planninq Comnission
on March 16, 1988 and up for final
action beiore the Chanhassen City Council on . April 11, 1988
The Ci ty Council ordered that a site plan approval
~ be granted based upon the documentation contained in
Planning File 86-2 Site Plan Review subject to the conditions on attached
Exhibit A~
Carver
State of Minnesota)
)ss
,
I
County
I, Jo Arm Olsen Ci ty Planner for the Ci ty of Chanhassen,
do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing with the
original record thereof, and have found the same to be a correct
and true summary thereof.
Witness my hand and official seal of Chanhassen, Minnesota, this
day of , 19
~Q~~
Chanhassen City Planner
NOT,E:
P.J:;2__ /
~
- . /"".: ~
__.a_.
'I
()
EXHIBIT A
1. The site plan shall meet the conditions of the conditional
use permit approval.
2. The wall signs shall meet the requirements of the ordinance.
3. No signage will be permitted on the gas canopy.
4. All rooftop equipment must be screened from view from any
direction.
5. The trash enclosure must oe totally screened.
6. The applicant shall not receive a building permit until MnDOT
has approved access permits for Hwy. 7 and Hwy. 41, the access
points have been installed and the final plat and development
contract for HSZ had been recorded with Carver County.
7. The revised plan shall be reviewed and approved by the
Minnesota Department or Transportation prior to final site
plan review and comply with their conditions.
8. Storm sewer calculations shall be submitted to the City
Englneer for approval prior to final site plan review.
9. A~ erosion control plan shall be submitted to the City
Engineer for approval prior to final site plan review.
10. The applicant shall provide the City with a copy of the exe-
cuted roadway easement for the portion of Lot 2, Block 1
which serves the westerly access for the subject parcel.
1'. Utility service for this property is contingent upon the HSZ
site improvements.
12. No building permits shall be issued to SuperAmerica until all
bnilding permits have been provided to HSZ and development
starts on the shopping center.
Uv &t'heAd<ZflJ"L
OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF CARVER
Filing Fee '$ If) t
This is to certify th,at this dqcJJIJl~n
~ileo 'n tpj,~offlce q~ the..,1U, ~y
19w..A.D.at~0 c oc
M. and was duly recorded as
document no.. 1.111.25
( CA~ANSON JR.
- & ountY(7\'rp;L
by: M~ G_iA{--=--- Y
"
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
PLANNING COMMISSION
Wednesday, January 7,1998
at 7:00 p.m.
City Hall Council Chambers
690 Coulter Drive
SUBJECT: Zoning Ordinance Amendment
and Conditional Use Permit
for Domino's Pizza
APPLICANT: Bloomington Pizza/PBK
Investments, Inc.
LOCATION: 7 & 41 Crossing Center
Hwy. 7 and 41
NOTICE: You are invited to attend a public hearing about a proposal in your area. The
applicant, Bloomington Pizza and PBK Investments, are requesting a zoning ordinance
amendment to allow a restaurant without a drive through in a BN, Neighborhood Business
District and a conditional use permit to allow a restaurant (Domino's Pizza) in a BN,
Neighborhood Business District located in the 7 & 41 Crossing Center.
What Happens at the Meeting: The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the
developer's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the
meeting, the Commission Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps:
1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project.
2. The Developer will present plans on the project.
3. Comments are received from the public.
4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses project. The commission will then
make a recommendation to the City Council.
Questions and Comments: If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City
Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to
someone about this project, please contact Cindy at 937-1900 ext. 117. If you choose to
submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting.
Staff will provide copies to the Commission.
Notice of this public hearing has been published in the Chanhassen Villager on January 1, 1998.
^ J
~.:;"S,(Cl~'i =;
1;).!-zc:Y' '7
rnJJJ-~Lc.d L0:..J
BENJAMIN GOWEN
6440 HAZELTINE BLVD
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
JOANNE & SHAWN KILLIAN
2449 WEST 64TH STREET
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
7-41 PARTNERSHIP
C/O R. SOSKIN 5591 BRISTOL LANE
MINNETONKA, MN 55343
RICK G BATESON
6440 ORIOLE AVE
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
RUSSELL & LYNN PAULY
2447 WEST 64TH STREET
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
7-41 PARTNERSHIP
5500 WAYZATA BLVD. SUITE 620
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416 .
JODY B. MAJERES
6450 ORIOLE AVE
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
HOWARD & MICHELLE NELSON
2445 WEST 64TH STREET
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
SUPER AMERICA 4366
PO BOX 14004
LEXINGTON, KY 40512
AGNES ANDERSON
6470 ORIOLE AVE
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
S. STEWART/F. BRITZIUS
2444 WEST 64TH STREET
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
MARK & LORENA FLANNERY
2350 MELODY HILL ROAD
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
DALE & KELLY HANCE
6480 ORIOLE AVE
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
MICHELLE CURTIS
2446 WEST 64TH STREET
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
GARY BRUNSVOLD
6287 CHASKA ROAD
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
THOMAS RODE
F275 CHASKA ROAD
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
NANCY JO PERKINS
2448 WEST 64TH STREET
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
ALLEN PUTNAM
6285 CHASKA ROAD
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
BARBARA PIKE
6421 ORIOLE AVENUE
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
ROR INC
2461 WEST 64TH STREET
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
MARJORIE/C.E. WOOSLEY JR
2511 HIGHWAY 7
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
JAN REED
2461 WEST 64TH STREET
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
GARY REED
2461 WEST 64TH STREET
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
GARY CARLSON
3891 WEST 62ND STREET
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
GARY S. REED
2471 WEST 64TH STREET
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
MARJORIE COLLINS
3931 ASTER TRAIL
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331