Loading...
1a2 Arboretum Business Park, 2nd Addition, Site Plan Review CITY 0 F CHANHASSEH 1. ~\\ '~";~" } vC,.. ,...10.,:1 PC DATE: 4/15/98 ~~""".:o:;.rr~:m,;.r'.l;",,,~-r CC DATE: 5/11/98 CASE: Site Plan #98-4 STAFF REPORT PROPOSAL: Request for site plan review for a 50,400 square foot building as one of two office- industrial-warehouse buildings or one building up to 113,600 sq. ft., Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition - z ~ J J 1. L ::( LOCATION: Northwest comer of Century Boulevard and Coulter Boulevard APPLICANT: Steiner Development 3601 Highway 101 South Wayzata, MN 55391 (612) 473-5650 PRESENT ZONING: PUD, Planned Unit Development ACREAGE: 4.76 acres or 9.16 acres FLOOR AREA RATIONS: 0.24 FAR 0.28 FAR ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: N - PUD S - PUD, Coulter Boulevard, Heartland America Building E - PUD, Century Boulevard W - PUD ~ - ~ WATER AND SEWER: Available to the site. ~ - PHYSICAL CHARACTER: Site was partially graded as part of the First Addition. - ) 2000 LAND USE PLAN: Office/Industrial LE~:',>...,.;:.; . . ,...,j T T ~/l '. ~ ~1~;~~Y1 ~, &h;~ if .~ I~"'>? o/~ II I '" \_"~~~ ,~r/_,1c.?fV * LohsY/""' \ "--r P ~// ' y;< IT \ klR ~;~ 'f::::::f ~ 1- R\ ~ \\\ ~ 01 I ~ -~'-'" ~ ~L ",c~s~ ~r- _ ~F\\~~/ ~'ICO~\~ \^V~l o ~SSh~' f<oC'lj I n "" ' ..,~lj.JilJt: r::J }:;:-., g ~ E ' r.r J. 1.1 I r . '-', ~ '1,:i:p, a...- ~/ o "'S \ \ ! ./,.~ \ /'0, "'>,\,: . t"j:, r '7'''' a. ~C; . 11vd Park u ::-:r 1J~ "r .,~ I r r T .- 11 n rllll I f- \ '.:~ I):.~ JITI If ~ .f . L ~ ~ .~ r-f ' ., .'o/b:' I rD, \ ~ R5 iJti. 00114/j . :r,"e ) .-..----j.' ; '0 \. o <:i -- .. i ~~ _ ~SlGI ~.: , :;> li St.: tJ.:---- I .::en ,IT evarr-' - J"I"E [",'Pi' ......8, ./1 1 - '1 ~ ....;.UW. '0'..:'''/,/, i?J <~>l. ~ I,:."C>'~C f3 . ["c,/:.,., '" '. .,/ W j::):>"c~;.~, 1'~ ~ I' '<" 't - , ., S:d I..:, ,. ' . '. .,' i',c,:. ~;~~?:)~ ',' ..... L 71" ~;c ~.r~' bqw~Ot \i~'" ~ .... ,~ '/.,'\ i ~~ :<f.7'K'~~ ~ a' [),J ________ ~ "'" ~ t;!j~Lm, '~=- ' \~IE::: _ '" ~ tr T . _ ~...:: ~. "'0 s~!.J~rrl.L.\T\ ne ': \ ~~ ~ '~~r e\:B-i1 OWl' ~ 'l tiT IT \U1.J~ J ~ V...x" c= ~~ '<2'A1 ~ ~,'~b:-~~'l~~ C~~JI~~~ ~~~~~~ Lyman 8 V'-rlT1 "0 ,..,~e" ~,;;.~f.:':' .fV' '0 -Q.J' ~ ~~'\~ -: \_ ~._~; ...,a , ! -I;" ) /. ; \ ' ar. , ~ \ '.,.,~::~,,- ",/ \ to: "-JILobf - t::.-- .. .,~~" ""'~ .' ~ ~ -~ ~_8t -- f I I o I o . ~ 8700 -! I o o Q) N Planning Commission Meeting - April 15, 1998 in the staff report. Alternate 1 would require a minimum of27 shade trees, 24 ornamental or conifer trees, and 36 shrubs. Alternate 2 would require a minimum of 63 shade trees, 48 ornamental or conifer trees, and 72 shrubs. The buffer yard on the west of the site shall incorporate native grasses and wildflower mix as ground cover. 13. Additional evergreens shall be added to the northern and southern landscape peninsulas at the comers of the building and at the southwest comer of the site to provide more screening of the loading areas from the street. 14. Each landscape peninsula must have one shade tree. Landscape peninsulas less than 10 feet in width must have aeration tubing installed. 15. The applicant shall install foundation plantings around the perimeter of the building as required by city ordinance. 16. On the utility plan, off the northwest comer of the Phase II part of the buildings, a hydrant is shown directly in the center of the driveway off Century Boulevard. Please provide a hydrant off of the northwest and the northeast comer of the phase 1 building. Please provide hydrant off the west side of the phase 2 building. Move the hydrant on the south side of the phase 2 building to the southwest comer of the building. 17. Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division policies will need to be reviewed and followed during the course of the project." 18. All roof mounted equipment shall be screened walls of compatible appearing material or camouflaged to blend into the building or background. 19. The applicant and staff present to the City Council a detailed presentation of all pedestrian and trail connections with this site. All voted in favor and the motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING: HKS ASSOCIATES IS REQUESTING A REPLA T OF A PORTION OF OUTLOTS D & E. VILLAGES ON THE PONDS INTO LOT 1. BLOCK 1. VILLAGES ON THE PONDS 3RD ADDITION AND SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR AN 7.443 SQ. FT. HOULIHAN'S RESTAURANT ON PROPERTY ZONED PUD AND LOCATED SOUTH OF HWY 5 AND EAST OF MARKET BOULEVARD. Sharmin AI-Jaff presented the staff report on this item. Peterson: Any questions for staff. Brooks: .. .bar-be-que shack? 14 Planning Commission Meeting - April 15, 1998 Joyce moved, Conrad seconded that the Planning Commission recommend approval of Site Plan #98-4 for a 50,400 square foot building, site plan prepared by Smuckler Architects dated March 10, 1998, subject to the following conditions: 1. The development must comply with the Development Design Standards for Arboretum Business Park. 2. The building entrances shall project out from the body of the building to provide significant visual relief in a manner and at intervals in keeping with the size, mass, and scale of the wall and its views from public streets. 3. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary security to guarantee erosion control, site restoration and landscaping. 4. The site plans shall be redesigned to reflect the proposed street and utility improvements proposed with Phase I of the City's public improvement project for Arboretum Business Park. 5. All driveway access points shall be constructed in accordance with the City's industrial driveway detail plate No. 5207. Drive aisle widths to the truck parking lot shall be increased to 30 feet wide and the turning radiuses onto Coulter Boulevard expanded to accommodate truck turning movements. 6. Erosion control fence shall be installed and maintained around the downstream side of the site until all disturbed areas have been revegetated and removal is authorized by the City. Storm sewer inlets shall be protected with silt fence, hay bales and/or rock filter dikes until the parking lot has been paved with a bituminous surface. 7. The City's boulevards must be restored with sod. The landscaping plan shall incorporate landscape material suitable for a 2: 1 slope. 8. Site plan approval is contingent upon the City authorizing and awarding a project for Phase II public improvements for Arboretum Business Park and final plat approval for Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition. 9. Detailed storm drainage calculations including drainage area maps for a IO-year, 24-hour storm event shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. 10. Commencement of construction for this development is contingent on the recording of a final plat for Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition. 11. The applicant shall provide areas for bicycle parking and storage on site. 12. The applicant shall work with staff to revise the landscape plan to meet minimum requirements for parking lot landscape, boulevard trees and buffer yard plantings as specified 13 Planning Commission Meeting - April 15, 1998 Blackowiak: It hasn't been seconded. Peterson: Yes it was. Generous: I believe you have to act on the amendment first to the motion and then... Burton: .. . offer a friendly amendment as part of the last... Conrad: We have to vote on the motion. Peterson: There's been a motion and a second. Burton moved, Brooks seconded that the Planning Commission recommends approval of Site Plan #98-4 for a 50,400 sq. ft. building or a 113,600 sq. ft. building, site plan prepared by Smuckler Architects dated March 10, 1998, and subject to the 18 conditions presented in the staff report with one addition presented by Commissioner Burton. All the commissioners voted in opposition and the motion failed unanimously. Peterson: Is there another motion? Joyce: I make a motion that the Planning Commission recommends approval of Site Plan #98-4 for a 50,400 square foot building, site plan prepared by Smuckler Architects dated March 10, 1998 subject to conditions 1 through, I believe we had 19. I'd have to do redo those conditions, wouldn't I? 18 being, make sure that the root top enclosures were screened with compatible materials. And number 19, that the applicant insure that the pedestrian access and access to trail system for this property. Peterson: Is there a second to this motion? Conrad: Second. Peterson: Discussion. Brooks: Well I just wanted to say that, I don't think the Planning Commission is against your large building. I think what we don't like is the architectural style of the building. I think we're becoming really weary of how Chanhassen is starting to look with all these warehouses. So... because I didn't get the feeling any of us were against the large building, or against what you're trying to do. It's just the look of it, and you've got to admit when you drive around Chanhassen, the warehouses are not a pretty site. And there's not a lot you can do but there's something you can do. Peterson: Any further discussion? 12 Planning Commission Meeting - April 15, 1998 Brooks: I'll reluctantly second. Peterson: Any discussion? Conrad: Yeah, we don't have to give approval for the second large building. Joyce: That's what 1... Conrad: I also think the motion should talk about staff making sure, present to the City Council that the connection, the trail connections, pedestrian connections, I think that's got to be real clear. It's a big building. Big site. Several employees so I think there should be a better demonstration of how it's connected. The large building is real repetitive and I think we all share the same concern. I think the proposal is okay but it's certainly probably not the great thing that we envisioned. I think the smaller building works. I think the message to the developer is, from here on out maybe we're going to have different expectations of what goes there but I'd just make those comments. The motion's there. Peterson: ... Conrad: I would make a friendly amendment to the motion that the staff presents, the staff and applicant presents to the City Council all the trail and pedestrian connections in the formal staff report. Burton: I think I'll, if! can, amend my motion to delete the reference to the 113,600 referenced building. Fred Richter: Can I speak to the issue of...? This PUD, this property was guided by the City for an industrial office park. The nature of office, industrial is large buildings. Our PUD grants us a certain floor area ratio.. .on land, the marketplace for us to do a successful, we need large buildings. I just want to say that that's, we went forward with the PUD. It's our understanding that we can have large buildings on this property. Large buildings by their nature are repetitive. .. .go on record that we feel that it's our right... The City made a decision, they wanted this type of taxes on the property. They made a very concerted effort to define where the retail is. They made a very concerted effort to put parameters on property that abuts Highway 5 and 41 with design constraints. We're talking about an interior lot that is guided for these uses and these sizes. And that is you know. . . we made our investment in the property and so on. Brooks: Can I respond to that? Peterson: No. Actually, thank you for your comments. We've got a motion and a second on the table and we need to vote on it.. . after do that, we can come back... Aanenson: Was the motion going to be amended or? Peterson: Well, can he amend a motion after it's been seconded? 11 Planning Commission Meeting - April 15, 1998 Generous: Correct. Joyce: But we will someday hopefully have, we're looking at some conference centers and some things like that. Generous: And convenience commercial. . . Joyce: I don't have much else to add. I'm not.. .by it. The building that's there right now look like any other office park, warehouse. It looks like a warehouse really is what it is and I had higher expectations for this PUD. I really thought we were going to try to do something more creative and so far it has not been. You know if we're just doing an office park like over here in the Chanhassen Business Center, that's one thing but I didn't get that understanding when we went through all the process. I agree with Allison. You've got the same parking out in front. I don't see any, it doesn't really look that pedestrian friendly. It looks like another office park. If that's what we're doing, then we've got a big office park out there. I mean I'm not going to, I'll vote for it but I'm not thrilled with it. .. . development more in the future and get some more interesting things other than warehouses. I mean it's just a warehouse. Peterson: Well I too am a little frustrated. I look at the 113,000 square foot building and I see ten entrances being virtually equal distance apart. Identical in nature. I just see a lot of the same and that disquiets me to say the least, and I don't see creativity. I too, like Kevin, had higher expectations and I'm not at all comfortable with approving a large 113,000 square foot building only because it's just overwhelming and in a spot that I think can offer a lot more. And I guess under some duress I would approve two buildings only because it does separate and give it at least a little bit softer, a little bit more inviting than the one large building. Architecturally it is like everything else and again I think that now is the time for us to say let's do something creative and different and now I'm placing economics aside by saying that and whether that's an issue, but yet it doesn't prevent me from sharing those thoughts so to that end I'm not comfortable with the large building. I'm comfortable with the changes that have been made that could have been integrated into the two separate buildings. With that, may I have a motion and a second please. Burton: I'll move that the Planning Commission recommend approval of Site Plan 98-4 for a 50,400 square foot building. Peterson: Subject to the following conditions. Go ahead and make your motion and then I'll respond accordingly. Burton: Or a 113,600 sq. ft. building, site plans prepared by Smuckler Architects dated March 10, 1998, subject to the following conditions and it's 1 through 17 and I would add 18. That all roof mounted equipment shall be screened walls of compatible appearing material or camouflaged to blend into the building or background. Peterson: We have a motion. Do we have a second. 10 Planning Commission Meeting - April 15, 1998 going to be covered up by a second building, I guess we can kind of live with that in the meantime. Finally, I had trouble because it talked about the building being similar in terms of the Heartland and I certainly hope that gets painted quickly because it's, I really wouldn't want it to be similar to Heartland right now. But really that's about it. Generally I think it's good. I would like to make sure that staff works with the applicant to carefully review pedestrian and bike access to the project because that's a very important part of this entire PUD so I would really want to make sure that that gets addressed as well. Peterson: Thank you. Matt? Burton: I pretty much agree with all the comments, particularly Alison's comments regarding landscaping because ifit does take a while for the Phase II of the smaller building to be built, it would be nice to have some landscaping, especially on the west and north sides. The other item that I threw out there is the staff report brought up the concern about screening and the applicant did address that but I did notice that it's not part of the conditions and I would.. .consider a condition that the roof mounted equipment be screened and that shouldn't be a problem since they're planning on that. And I guess that's it. Peterson: Thank you. LuAnn. Sidney: Well I made a few comments and tipped my hand about my concerns and I guess kind of starting off, at first when I saw the original renderings I was concerned that we were getting too much of the same thing and I think the applicant has done a good job in improving the architectural features of the building. I am concerned however because I still have a feeling that the textures, lack of texture on both buildings is too much the same and I'd like to see other possibilities and I think maybe the entrance forms is an area where a different texture could be used to add some interest to the buildings. I'm concerned with the polish or the look to the building. I would like to reiterate, if! can say it, staff comments about not supporting additional buildings that incorporate the same materials or design as the first two site plan proposals and I feel very strongly about that. I think since these buildings are more in the center of the development, I feel a little more comfortable but I think we need some more variety next time around. That's all I have for now. Peterson: Thank you. Kevin. Joyce: Mr. Chairman, I apologize for being late. I have one quick question for staff. Have we tossed about the idea of any commercial going in there? ..all allocated towards office and industrial warehouse. Generous: Well within the entire Arboretum Business Park there are 4 lots, or 4 parcels that are designated for. Joyce: ... the PUD, the entire PUD is going to have some commercial. I didn't understand it and I got a building square footage breakdown. It's just right now zero commercial. 9 Planning Commission Meeting - April 15, 1998 Fred Richter: .. .what happens then is what people said and.. .so that's why we need to be in a position.. . try to have this coincide with the final plat. We've had preliminary plat approved so... Then that allows us to you know pull the permit. . . Peterson: Other questions from fellow commissioners? Thank you. Seeing none, may I have a motion to open this to a public hearing and a second please. Sidney moved, Burton seconded to open the public hearing. The public hearing was opened. Peterson: This is a public hearing. Anyone wishing to address the commission, please come forward and state your name and address please? Seeing none... Brooks moved, Blackowiak seconded to close the public hearing. The public hearing was closed. Peterson: Ladd. Can we have your comments on this one please. Conrad: I'm okay. I agree with the staff report. Peterson: Alyson. Brooks: I guess I don't have anything against it. I don't find the building itself particularly architecturally intriguing in any way... with the parking in front like any warehouse. It just detracts from the building and looks unpleasant but it is what it is. I'm not overwhelmed by it. I'm a little under whelmed. I don't see any reason to stop it either. Peterson: Recommendations to improve it or. Brooks: Not really off the top of my head. I think it would have been better if things were recessed...in front is flushed and I'm not sure, I don't know. It's a warehouse. You know I wish somehow we could move the parking or hide it. I don't think it ever helps when the parking's out in front. I think visually your eyes.. . and again it is what it is and I'm not sure there's much we can do. Peterson: Allison. Blackowiak: Yeah, I really don't have a lot to say. A couple comments I guess. If indeed they are looking for the smaller of the two buildings, the 50,000 square foot building, Phase I, I would ask if there could be something done, some type of landscaping or something on the second part. Could we do that now in conjunction with Phase I as opposed to have it just wait? Specifically along the back of the lot. I think that would be kind of west side. On the north side against the street. I think those would be some things that maybe could be added to improve the general appearance to the area yet not be disturbed by any future construction. Secondly, the north side, I kind of agree with the comments that the north side is visually not terribly appealing but if it is 8 Planning Commission Meeting - April 15, 1998 Sidney: Yes. A question about the rationale behind two buildings versus one smaller building with the potential for expansion. I guess I'm wondering why you would select two separate buildings but not really when I see the rendering here, now it angle off all the comers that are visible to Century Boulevard. This looks like you took an eraser and kind of went down the middle of the building. Steve Krapek: The rationale of why the entries are where they are is because historically there's a certain tenant size that you can.. . and you're trying to be as accommodating as you can to all the tenants that you can have and so you essentially.. . structurally end up with an entry at every third bay. There really isn't any need from.. .because the entry that would go to this final tenant along that side is taken care of back. .. The difference in the two buildings is that again, the marketplace is very competitive and people have different needs and if a large anchor tenant came in, they may have different needs in terms of their storage type... Some people have high rack storage. Some have low rack storage. The predominant market at this moment, am I correct is that they don't need to have high rack storage. So they're trying to accommodating enough for a long term tenant that might need that. You look at that as a potential to give something that's not readily available in the marketplace but.. . overbuild high rack storage when it's not something that you actually need, it's really not either serving the marketplace and if the cost that the developer has to incur, that it really isn't going to be recovered. And so I think until it's settled out which they tenant they go and what the marketplace is saying that they demand, that's why the flexibility is there. But they're trying to be as accommodating as they can to all parties. Fred Richter: I think the building's flexibility is defined by the.. . and we design and own our buildings so we also look for. .. You see a lot of the tenant bays moving to Hopkins, Eden Prairie and moving out... At this point in time we're trying to do this site plan... Sidney: One more question about material. I'm wondering ifit's possible to have a different type of texture in the entrance forms. Is that a possibility? Steve Krapek: It is a possibility. The materiaL.. tends to be the most attractive one I believe of all of them. The smooth finish is the one you pay the most premium for and it gives you the greatest facility to manipulate color. You know as you go into a form that has some sort of texture or surfacing about it, it tends to distort the paint. It tends to wear off quicker. It tends to put more of a premium on that finish and. . . Blackowiak: ...PUD standards and this is office industrial warehouse, am I correct? Do you have anybody you're looking at or is it still kind of up in the air? Fred Richter: .... Blackowiak: So with what you're looking at right now, would that be looking at the smaller building which you said was more manufacturing oriented? 7 Planning Commission Meeting - April 15, 1998 would be the street frontage. And it's this elevation. The rendering elevation and what's a bit confusing in that drawing is that this element that you're seeing here in this rendering, it's at a 45 degree angle so it appears skewed and narrower on that building elevation than it is in actual fact. It's the same width as all the other ones. The north elevation that's shown on that same sheet that's down in the middle of, down here. That would be one of the internal facades when the second building was built and so it really isn't of much point, there's really no entry to... Peterson: And your primary people using that entrance are going to be truck traffic. . . back side of the building, correct? Steve Krapek: I don't believe that we'll bring trucks that way. I think the intent is to bring them down this road in the back. And also along the other one and not have trucks circulate through the center of that parking. That would be more for office and warehouse. Fred Richter: But hopefully all the truck traffic is... Peterson: But visually it would be limited to the users of the building primarily? Steve Krapek: And I think Fred made a good point. That until the...is filled, you are correct in assuming that. . . Peterson: Other questions? Joyce: I have no other questions. Regarding the pedestrian access. I don't see any sidewalks or link ups to the trails and I noticed that was on. Fred Richter: ...I think right now we just haven't detailed it but Bob, you can correct my memory, are we on the east side...? Generous: It was always proposed that on the east side of Century Boulevard, the trail system would be and then connecting to Coulter Boulevard going to the east. Which is on the north side of Coulter. Fred Richter: And it'd be the same thing going north. Aanenson: Correct. It loops around. Generous: Yeah, and then there's an internal trail and then a street trail that would connect to the north side of Highway 5. Fred Richter: I think a site plan detail, you'll give us some guidance, we will have some connection for the pedestrians to cross... Peterson: Other questions? 6 Planning Commission Meeting - April 15, 1998 that we were talking about is rather than have one long facade that was 300 feet long, we bumped those entry forms out 5 feet. Peterson: Other questions. Joyce: What's different with the west elevation as far as the treatment versus, is there any difference? Steve Krapek: The west elevation is different in the character of the skin of the building. The front of the building.. .are smooth, similar to the building that was. .. The back part, the west elevation and this band that's above this.. . reveal which would be here, is still the smooth finish. The back.. .are you familiar with what that looked like. Joyce: I saw that in the report. Steve Krapek: Essentially they take a. . . Fred Richter: The west elevation is all loading docks... Steve Krapek: And it's finish tends to create a lot more shadow lines than a smooth face would. I won't say that... Fred Richter: As Bob pointed out earlier, the good thing that the site plan is, our west elevations always face into a hill. So basically doing the west elevation is almost... for the most part the west elevations face into... Peterson: Move to the north elevation. Assuming that that is, at least for a period of time, the majority of your traffic is going to be coming down that road from the north. Your first impression is a pretty cold and blank wall of the small rendering that I'm looking at at least of the building. Steve Krapek: Well it's exactly this shot and it's a fairly deceiving elevation because if you look at this plan. Fred Richter: There's some confusion on that because in both cases, you're looking at this north elevation but that would be, that would be the elevation for a period of time but our intent is to do the next building, another 50,000 square foot building and that would become an internal elevation but it could be a year. . . where that would be the north elevation. The only difference is that we aren't... Peterson: Even on the larger building, the north elevation, the only difference seems to be six windows that are.. .on the rendering. Steve Krapek: No. The north elevation that's shown at the top of your sheet that would say EDO 5. In that instance the north elevation is down here at the long end of this property so that 5 Planning Commission Meeting - April 15, 1998 Fred Richter: .. . system is a very smooth finish with a.. . reveals and all those reveals then are complimented or articulated by the changing color. So you actually get the... through the change of color. Not necessarily the depth. The only way you would get articulation through depth would be shade and shadow and even if it were 2 inches, it would be very nominal so through the basically taking this smooth concrete which then becomes like a palette for painting and you can really then develop... very cost effective way compared to other industrial buildings where the options aren't... combining them with changes in paint colors. Steve Krapek: The other thing that I would add to that is that you know typically other buildings that are of this scale that aren't pre-cast, and they aren't masonry, tend to be that EFIS.. . system. The styrofoam that has the stucco.. .on top of it. Traditionally even in just for instance the Dayton's that's over at Southdale. Those reveals are no deeper than an inch, two inches. The difference hopefully in this one is that we have fairly wide reveals compared to some of those longer ones and you know we've done different things to try to break that mass down and color becomes a fairly important part of that process. The revealing and the diamonds and that tend to give a certain rhythm and flow to that building so that it just isn't this big blank sort of thing but obviously there's only so much you can do with a lot of blank wall and the color is really a fairly important part of that. Peterson: Is this building material essentially the same as the previous? It's just a different color. Fred Richter: It's the same structural concept, basic concept... Peterson: Other questions from fellow commissioners? Conrad: So the rendering is really not accurate? Steve Krapek: No, the rendering is fairly accurate. This one? Peterson: The one that we have. .' 'Conrad: The one that you just passed around. Steve Krapek: Accurate in what way? Conrad: The depth. Steve Krapek: Yes it is. The entry forms that are shown here previously as it was submitted, it was all one flat facade. There was no stepping out of these entry forms at all so. Conrad: This looks like 2 feet and you were just saying 2 inches so. Steve Krapek: No. I'm sorry. What we're talking about the is the depth of these reveals, like this red stripe, these diamonds. This panel sits back from the face of that panel. The other issue 4 Planning Commission Meeting - April 15, 1998 paneling aren't that... so we felt we needed to bring in some additional color to help bring those along. That's the color that's shown here and I believe...it doesn't show very well on that screen but all the colors, the two that are here are actual paint samples from the paint.. . sent to us. They give you fairly good indication of the direction that we're going. This lower band that goes below the windows is again still precast. .. As I mentioned before, the back of this building will have the...pre-cast concrete finish. The front of this is smooth... The diamonds that are shown here are. .. The parapet walls above the roof line is high enough so the mechanical equipment is screened. We also think that. . .and the treatment that we did along the top of that building in raising that panel up slightly higher tends to break that long facade a little different than you've seen traditionally in a lot of the other buildings around here. Some of them have made that gesture but they've done it with metal roof forms that are back from the building and they haven't actually changed this perimeter or the skin at all. And we've done that. This panel now is an inset panel that's just being painted a different color. It isn't recessed that was indicated probably by the shadowing when we did this rendering a couple days ago. But the entry glass is recessed some to give you some reliefback... And again this band that's shown here is the one that's shown in this perspective.. . about an inch or two and they'll be painted in those stripes. Peterson: You speak of that reveal being an inch or two in depth. Walk through if you would, are they all. . . or are some of them greater in depth than others? Steve Krapek: Well I think if we look at this, and it's rather small. I'll pass this around so you can get a better feel for what this color is actually like. I think obviously there's an issue of exiting and life safety so each one of these bays will have an entry and I believe that this.. .it's sitting back and it probably will only happen if the primary entity. .. wouldn't you think? Peterson: That was my second question so you can answer them both. The depth of the entrance and the reveals, architectural reveals being the diamonds and the character around the entrance itself. Are they 2 inches also like your band or are they a foot? Steve Krapek: No, the walls themselves are only a foot thick.. .insulated panels. About 3 inches to 4 and then the insulation is integral in that.. .so those reveals will be on the order of an inch and a half to 2 inches.. .the engineers and the problem of how much revealing we have and.. .but I would think that the diamonds could be deeper than the horizontal reveals and typically they're between an inch and an inch and a half. Peterson: Discuss the possibility if you would, going deeper... My sense is architecturally you'd get more character out of more depth but what are the alternatives, is that possible based upon the current building or not? I could be wrong. I'm just giving my opinion there. Steve Krapek: Well you could maybe go 2 inches. In asked them, you know without that additional cost, you are limited by that first thickness of concrete because as I said, it's a very ingenious system that they came up with buildings insulated with styrofoam in-between those pours and they have. . . the thickness of that wall so in all of that that I've ever seen is 2 inches. 3 Planning Commission Meeting - April 15, 1998 Peterson: Now you're drawing the line and you're saying no more like this after this one? Generous: That was my point, yes. Peterson: Okay. To that end, does the applicant or their designee wish to address the commission and if so, please come forward and state your name and address please. Fred Richter: I'm Fred Richter with Steiner Development and I have with me tonight Steve Krapek ofSmuckler Architects. He'll speak to the color renderings and the tile massing of the project. And also Peter Kordonowy our property manager for the first Steiner buildings in the Arboretum Business Park. Let me just give you a little insight into why we have two options in front of you. We're trying to develop the Arboretum Business Park for industrial and following the PUD, as you recall, there are certain sites that will front on Highway 5 and 41 and those will have, in some cases, different uses that's outlined in that PUD. We are owners and developers of multi-tenant office-warehouse projects. Our first building is fully leased up and we'll be finishing the final construction at the painting and landscaping right away starting next week and leaving through the month of May. Looking at trying to move the project along, the City, ourselves invested in Century Boulevard and we picked this site. It's already graded. It's ready to go and Century Boulevard will be blacktopped to the site. Looking at the square footage and the potential of this site as outlined in the PUD, it yields I think Bob said up to 117,000 square feet of floor area ratio. Looking at the market place, it's changed. We're in a more mature market now. There's getting to be quite a bit of vacancy, especially in the southwest. Shakopee and even in the east side ofChanhassen. So we're proposing two, because we want to get an anchor tenant before we start construction. So if we have a larger tenant, one of 50,000 square feet, it would trigger the larger building. If we get a smaller tenant, something in the neighborhood of a minimum of around 18-20,000 square feet, we would do the smaller building and then phase the second building. The object obviously is to, from our standpoint, not to overbuild the market and have a lot of vacancy. So that's why we're looking for the flexibility. Currently we're marketing both buildings and we have interest in both but until we have a signed tenant, we don't want to move forward so we appreciate your consideration on that flexibility. Other than that, I think I'll turn it over to Steve and he can run through the final color selections and I'll just preface one final statement. The staff comments we reviewed the issue of the protruding mass versus the recessed mass is fine with us. We've made that adjustment. Steve will show you the impact of pulling basically the area around the entrance out versus recessing. Steve Krapek: As Fred said, I'm Steve Krapek with Smuckler Architects. On the overhead, if you want to do it that way. You can see a perspective from the corner. The building that's shown in this perspective is the higher of the two proposals that we've shown and the longer one. As you can see in this area, this is the area that we discussed with Bob in terms of pulling all those entry forms open. If you look on the plan, it's probably easier to.. . forward but you can see that it runs between the entrance... I believe are three bays long. Giving sort of multiple opportunities for... The color schemes that we used tended to be those that we discussed with Bob. Also the colors that were sort of compatible with what we felt. .. On all the entry forms we tend to darken up the entry so that. . . scale of the building down. The relief that are in the recast 2 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING APRIL 15, 1998 Chairman Peterson called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Alison Blackowiak, Matt Burton, Craig Peterson, LuAnn Sidney, Allyson Brooks, Ladd Conrad and Kevin Joyce STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Planning Director; Bob Generous, Senior Planner; Sharmin AI-Jaff, Planner II; and Dave Hempel, Asst. City Engineer PUBLIC HEARING: STEINER DEVELOPMENT IS REQUESTING SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR TWO OFFICE INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS UP TO 113.600 SQ. FT. LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CENTURY BOUEL V ARD AND COULTER BOULEVARD ON PROPERTY ZONED PUD. ARBORETUM BUSINESS PARK. Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item. Peterson: Questions of staff from fellow commissioners. One clerical in nature. If you look at the.. .113,600 building that says it will be built on 9.16 acres and then you look at Lot 3 as being 8.98. Where's the difference coming from or is that just. Generous: It's moving through the line in the project. It's slightly north of halfway. Peterson: If there's no questions, I think the key thing I guess really seeing a better rendering of what the proposal is and...some of those changes are. The other item you talked about in the staff report, and I quote in the other paragraph it says, the staffwill not support additional buildings that incorporate the same materials or design elements as the first two site plan proposals. You also inferred that it's similar to the first building and.. . falling into a gray area about similarity versus distinctly different. Do you see the first building on that site is developing, that the difference with the current...in front of us tonight, is that substantially different or are you talking abruptly different in it's dealing in architecture or is the difference that you see... for additional buildings in that development. Generous: I believe, what I'm looking for is when we have another building that might be similar, office warehouse type that they incorporate additional materials so that we don't have only tilt up cOl~crete paneling in there. Maybe block face. Some I'm aware we're looking at for at least the highway frontages would probably be brick and steel and glass finishes. Peterson: Is it safe to assume then you're somewhat accepting this one being somewhat similar to the first one? Generous: Yes. Right. THE MINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM 3675 ARBORETUM DRIVE CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 MILLS PROPERTIES 512 LAUREL STREET, PO BOX 505 BRAINERD, MN 56401 COEUR TERRA LLP 3610 SOUTH HIGHWAY 101 WAYZATA. MN 55391 CHASKA GATEWAY PARTNERS 3610 SOUTH HIGHWAY 101 WAYZATA, MN 55391 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING COMMISSION Wednesday, April 15, 1998 at 7:00 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers 690 City Center Drive ~ -&.. SUBJECT: Request for a Site Plan Review for Two Office Industrial Warehouse Buildings >- III ~ .r:. Cl I COl .... APPLICANT: Steiner Development ~nd st. LOCATION: NW Corner of Century Blvd. and Coulter Blvd. D NOTICE: You are invited to attend a public hearing about a proposal in your area. The applicant, Steiner Development, is requesting site plan review for two office industrial warehouse buildings up to 113,600 sq. ft. The property is located in the Arboretum Business Park. What Happens at the Meeting: The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the developer's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Commission Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The Developer will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses project. The commission will then make a recommendation to the City Council. Questions and Comments: If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Bob at 937-1900 ext. 141. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. Notice of this public hearing has been published in the Chanhassen Villager ~Iqct Bob Generous April 8, 1998 Page 3 2. All driveway access points shall be constructed in accordance with the City's industrial driveway detail plate No. 5207. Drive aisle widths to the truck parking lot shall be increased to 30 feet wide and the turning radiuses onto Coulter Boulevard expanded to accommodate truck turning movements. 3. Erosion control fence shall be installed and maintained around the downstream side of the site until all disturbed areas have been revegetated and removal is authorized by the City. Storm sewer inlets shall be protected with silt fence, hay bales and/or rock filter dikes until the parking lot has been paved with a bituminous surface. 4. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary financial security to guarantee erosion control measures, site restoration and landscaping. 5. The City's boulevards must be restored with sod. The landscaping plan shall incorporate landscape material suitable for a 2: 1 slope. 6. Site plan approval is contingent upon the City authorizing and awarding a project for Phase II public improvements for Arboretum Business Park and final plat approval for Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition.. 7. Detailed storm drainage calculations including drainage area maps for a 10- year, 24-hour storm event shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. ktm c: Anita Benson, City Engineer g:\eng\dave\pc\l3 hI abp 2nd.doc Bob Generous April 8, 1998 Page 2 project engineer the appropriate locations for the sewer and water services and adjust the site plan accordingly. STREETS/PARKING LOTS The City's Public Improvement Project No. 97-1 will be completing a portion of Century Boulevard up to the east leg of Coulter Boulevard this spring. The applicant has submitted a petition to the City to extend Century Boulevard and Coulter Boulevard west of Century Boulevard. Without this improvement project the site plan shall be considered premature since there will be inadequate utility improvements and street systems to accommodate this development. The drive aisle widths throughout the project appear to be in conformance with City Code. Staff recommends that the truck access onto Coulter Boulevard be increased from 26 feet wide to 30 feet wide to accommodate truck traffic. In addition, the turning radius onto Coulter Boulevard needs to be increased to accommodate turning movements. Industrial driveway aprons will be required at all access points onto city streets. The City has a standard plate (5207) which should be utilized. EROSION CONTROL The grading, drainage and erosion control plan needs to be modified to incorporate erosion control fence and erosion control blanket on slopes in excess of 3: 1. All storm sewer inlets shall be protected with silt fence, hay bales or rock filter dikes until the parking lot has been paved with a bituminous surface. MISCELLANEOUS The City's boulevards must be restored with sod. The landscaping proposed along the westerly slopes of the site should incorporate landscape materials which will help secure the steep slopes. The site is currently platted as an outlot. The applicant will need to final plat the site to Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition. In addition, an addendum to the existing Development Contract/PUD Agreement will be necessary. Final plat documents need to be submitted to the City a minimum of three weeks prior to final plat consideration by the City Council. CONDITIONS OF APPRO V AL 1. The site plans shall be redesigned to reflect the proposed street and utility improvements proposed with Phase I of the City's public improvement project for Arboretum Business Park. CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 City Center Drive, PO Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Phone 612.937.1900 General Fax 612.937.5739 Engineering Fax 612.937.9152 Public Safety Fax 612.934.2524 iVeb www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Bob Generous, Senior Planner ,I ,Ai.' Dave Hempel, Assistant City Engineer w"\:, FROM: DATE: April 8, 1998 SUBJ: Site Plan Review for Two Office Warehouse Buildings Located in the Northeast Corner of Century Boulevard and Coulter Boulevard Lot 3, Block 1, Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition File No. 98-10 LUR Upon review of the plans prepared by Schoell & Madson dated March 20, 1998, I offer the following comments and recommendations: GRADING The site was previously rough graded in conjunction with Phase I Arboretum Business Park. Therefore, only minor site grading will be necessary for the building pad and parking lot construction. The grading plan overall is in general conformance with the development plan for Arboretum Business Park. Given the site's topography, berming will not be achieved along Century Boulevard. The site is actually anywhere from one to ten feet above Century Boulevard. DRAINAGE In conjunction with Phase I of the City's public improvement project for Arboretum Business Park, storm sewer improvements have been installed along Century Boulevard. Phase II of Arboretum Business Park will include street and utility improvements to accommodate this site. The storm sewers proposed on the site plan will need to be redesigned to coordinate with the City's public improvement project. Detailed storm drainage calculations including drainage area maps for a lO-year, 24-hour storm event shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. UTILITIES Municipal sanitary sewer and water has been extended in conjunction with the City's Public Improvement Project No. 97-1 along a portion of Century Boulevard adjacent to the site. However, no individual sanitary sewer or water service has been extended at this time to service the lots. In conjunction with Phase II of the City's public improvement project individual sewer and water services will be extended to the lots. The applicant's engineer shall coordinate with the City's The City of Chanhassen. A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and P, 7. All signs shall require a separate sign permit. 8. In addition to the two signs identified in g. 5. above, signage for the main entrance on Highway 5 and Century Boulevard shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission and City Council. h. Lighting 1. Lighting for the interior of the business center should be consistent throughout the development. The street lights should be designed consistent with the existing lighting along the existing Coulter Boulevard. 2. A decorative, shoe box fixture (high pressure sodium vapor lamps) with a square ornamental pole shall be used throughout the development area for area lighting. 3 Lighting equipment similar to what is mounted in the public street right-of-ways shall be used in the private areas. 4. All light fixtures shall be shielded. Light level for site lighting shall be no more than 1/2 candle at the property line. This does not apply to street lighting. i. Alternative Access 1. Each site shall accommodate transit service within the individual development whenever possible. 2. Pedestrian access shall be provided from each site to the public sidewalk and trail system. 3. The developer and site users shall promote and encourage Traffic Demand Management Strategies. 4. Each site shall provide areas for bicycle parking and storage. 7 f. Site Landscaping and Screening 1. Landscaping along Highways 41 and 5 shall comply with Buffer yard standard C. Coulter Boulevard, Century Boulevard, and West 82nd Street shall comply with Buffer yard standard B. The master landscape plan for the Arboretum Business Park (formerly Gateway) PUD shall be the design guide for all of the specific site landscape developments. Each lot must present a landscape plan for approval with the site plan review process. 2. Storage of material outdoors is prohibited unless it has been approved under site plan review. All approved outdoor storage must be screened with masonry fences and/or landscaping. 3. Undulating or angular berms or elevation changes of3' in height shall be placed along Coulter Boulevard, and Century Boulevard. The berms shall be sodded or seeded at the conclusion of each project Phase grading and utility construction. The required buffer landscaping may be installed incrementally, but it shall be required where it is deemed necessary to screen any proposed development. All required boulevard landscaping shall be sodded. 4. Loading areas shall be screened 100 percent year round from public right-of-ways. Wing walls may be required where deemed appropriate. g. Signage 1. All freestanding signs be limited to monument signs. The sign shall not exceed eighty (80) square feet in sign display area nor be greater than eight (8) feet in height. The sign treatment is an element of the architecture and thus should reflect the quality of the development. The signs should be consistent in color, size, and material throughout the development. The applicant should submit a sign package for staff review. 2. Each property shall be allowed one monument sign per street frontage. 3. The signage will have consistency throughout the development. A common theme will be introduced at the development's entrance monument and will be used throughout. 4. Consistency in signage shall relate to color, size, materials, and heights. 5. The Arboretum Business Park PUD shall be permitted two Arboretum Business Park identification signs. One sign per project entrance, at West 82nd and Century Boulevard and at Highway 41 and the westerly roadway, shall be permitted. Said sign shall not exceed 80 square feet in sign area nor be greater than eight feet in height. 6. Wall sign shall be permitted per city ordinance for industrial office park site. 6 1. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. All mechanical equipment shall be screened with material compatible to the building. 2. All materials shall be of high quality and durable. Masonry material shall be used. Color shall be introduced through colored block or panels and not painted cinder block. 3. Brick may be used and must be approved to assure uniformity. 4. Block shall have a weathered face or be polished, fluted, or broken face. 5. Concrete may be poured in place, tilt-up or pre-cast, and shall be finished in stone, textured, coated, or painted. 6. Metal siding will not be approved except as support material to one of the above materials or curtain wall on office components or, as trim or as HV AC screen. 7. All accessory structures shall be designed to be compatible with the primary structure. 8. All roof mounted equipment shall be screened by walls of compatible appearing material or camouflaged to blend into the building or background. Wood screen fences are prohibited. All exterior process machinery, tanks, etc., are to be fully screened by compatible materials. 9. The use of large unadorned, pre-stressed concrete panels and concrete block shall be prohibited. Acceptable materials will incorporate textured surfaces, exposed aggregate and/or other patterning. All walls shall be given added architectural interest through building design or appropriate landscaping. The buildings shall have varied and interesting detailing. The use of large unadorned, concrete panels and concrete block, or a solid wall unrelieved by architectural detailing, such as change in materials, change in color, fenestrations, or other significant visual relief provided in a manner or at intervals in keeping with the size, mass, and scale of the wall and its views from public ways shall be prohibited. Acceptable materials will incorporate textured surfaces, exposed aggregate and/or other patterning. All walls shall be given added architectural interest through building design or appropriate landscaping. 10. Space for recycling shall be provided in the interior of all principal structures or within an enclosure for each lot developed in the Business Center. 11 Each buildings shall contain one or more pitched roof elements depending on scale and type of building, or other architectural treatments such as towers, arches, vaults, entryway projections, canopies and detailing to add additional interest and articulation to structures. 12. There shall be no underdeveloped sides of buildings visible from public right-of-ways. All elevations visible from the street shall receive nearly equal treatment and visual qualities. 5 Lot 1, Block 1 1.80 Lot 2, Blockl 2.32 Lot 4, Block 4 Office/Hotel 4.06 LotI, Block 3 6.41 Restaurant/Office 11,746/23,520 15,180/30,320 26,536 / 53,060 (.lOFAR) 27937 / 83,770 (5/1000) 59 (411000) 61 (5/1000) 133 (1611000) 447 Commercial sites may develop as office-industrial uses. Square footage for individual lots may be reallocated within the development, by type, provided the maximum square footage is not exceeded. Building Square Footage Breakdown Office 31% 368,000/(432,000) Light Industrial 31% 368,000/(432,000) Warehouse 31% 368,000/(432,000) Commercial 7% 81,000/(0) Total 100% 1,186,000 / (1,295,000) *includes the Wrase property. () represents conversion of commercial uses to office- industrial uses 2. More than one (1) principal structure may be placed on one (1) platted lot. 3. Building height shall be limited to 3 stories or 40 feet. 4. Lot 5, Block 4, is intended to accommodate a major corporate headquarters or office, research, high end manufacturing with limited warehousing type user. While the majority of the development is based on 30 percent office space, Lot 5 must have a minimum of 40 percent office use and include multi-story building(s). e. Building Materials and Design 4 . General Merchandise Store c. Setbacks The development is regulated by the Highway 5 and the PUD Standards. There are no minimum requirements for setbacks on interior lot lines in the PUD zone. The following setbacks shall apply: Street Frontage Minimum Setback Buildin arkin 70/50 50/20 Hwys. 5 & 41 Coulter & Century Boulevards 82" & West Local 30/20 NA *Lot 5, Block 4, must only meet the maximum setback on one Highway frontage. The average hard surface coverage does not include Outlots A and B. The PUD standard for hard surface coverage is 70% for office and industrial uses. Anyone site/lot can exceed the 70 percent requirement but in no case can the entire finished development exceed 70 percent. d. Development Standards Tabulation Box 1. Building Area Lot 3, Block 1 10.02 131,006 262 Lot 4, Block 1 5.45 71,218 142 Lot 5, Block 1 4.41 57,688 115 Lot 1, Block 4 4.38 57,199 114 Lot 2, Block 4 5.40 70,597 141 Lot 3, Block 4 8.98 117,371 235 Lot 1, Block 2 12.23 159,822 320 3 Conferences/Convention Center - establishments designed to accommodate people in assembly, providing conference and meeting services to individuals, groups, and organizations. (Lot 5, Block 4) Indoor RecreationlHealth Club - establishments engaged in operating reducing and other health clubs, spas, and similar facilities featuring exercise and other physical fitness conditioning. (Lot 1, Block 3; and Lot 4, Block 4) HoteL1l1otel-establishments engaged in furnishing lodging, or lodging and meals, to the general public. (Lot 1, Block 3; and Lot 4, Block 4) Utility Services - Water towers and reservoir. (Lots 3, 4, and 5, Block 1; Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 4; and the Wrase property) Commercial uses (permitted on lots specified as commercial in development standards tabulation box) 1. Restaurant, permitted on Lot 1, Block 3 or Lot 4, Block 4. (One stand alone restaurant.) 2. Convenience store with or without gas pumps, not to exceed 12,000 square feet, on Lot 1 or 2, Block 1, only. (One convenience store.) 3. Banks, with or without drive up windows (Lots 1 and 2, Block 1; Lot 1, Block 3; and Lot 4, Block 4) 4. Day Care - establishments providing for the care and supervision of infants and children on a daily basis. (Lots 1 and 2, Block 1; Lot 1, Block 3; and Lot 4, Block 4) Ancillary Uses (in conjunction with and integral to a primary use) 1. Fast Food (no drive-through and only in conjunction with and integral to a convenience store ). 2. Restaurant (only in conjunction with hoteVmotel or convention/conference center). 3. Showroom - showroom type display area for products stored or manufactured on-site provided that no more than 20 percent of the floor space is used for such display and sales. 4. Telecommunication Towers and Antennas by conditional use permit only. 5. Car wash, in conjunction with convenience store. 6. Day Care Prohibited uses . Contractors Yard . Lumber Yard . Home ImprovementIBuilding Supply . Garden Center . Auto related including sales and repair . Home furnishings and equipment stores 2 EXHIBIT C ARBORETUM BUSINESS PARK DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS Development Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD light industrial/office park. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. All utilities are required to be placed underground. Each lot proposed for development shall proceed through site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. Photo- composite images of proposed development adjacent to Highways 5 and 41 shall be submitted as part of the review process. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Ancillary uses may be permitted as listed below if they are ancillary to a principal use on the individual lot. Commercial/retail uses are prohibited except those uses specifically noted below. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone should be limited to light industrial, warehousing, and office as defined below. The uses shall be limited to those as defined herein. Ifthere is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the City Council shall make that interpretation. Permitted uses shall be allowed on the different Blocks and Lots for which they are specified below. The Blocks and Lots specified below are those designated on the attached PUD plan. The Block and Lot designations in final plats approved for phases of development may differ from those specified below. However, the permitted uses shall continue to be those specified below for the Lots identified in the PUD plan. Light Industrial- The manufacturing, compounding, processing, assembling, packaging, or testing of goods or equipment or research activities entirely within an enclosed structure, with no outside storage. There shall be negligible impact upon the surrounding environment by noise, vibration, smoke, dust or pollutants. (Lots 3, 4, and 5, Block 1; Lot 1, Block 2; Lots 1,2,3, and 5, Block 4; and the Wrase property) Warehousing - Means the commercial storage of merchandise and personal property. (Lots 3, 4, and 5, Block 1.; and Lots 1,2,3, and 5, Block 4) Office - Professional and business office. (Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, Block1; Lot 1, Block 2; Lot l, Block 3; Lots1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, Block 4; and the Wrase property) Health Services- establishments primarily engaged in furnishing medical, surgical and other health services to persons. (Lots 1 and 2, Block 1; Lot 1, Block 3; and Lot 4, Block 4) CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 City Center Drive, PO Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Phone 612.937.1900 General Fax 612.937.5739 Engineering Fax 612.937.9152 Public Safety Fax 612.934.2524 \Veb www.ci.chanhassen.//ln.us MEMORANDUM TO: Bob Generous, Senior Planner Steve A. Kirchman, Building Official 4- 0. . \! . FROM: DATE: April 6, 1998 SUBJECT: 98-4 SPR (Arboretum Business Park, Steiner Development) I was asked to review the variance proposal stamped "CITY OF CHANHASSEN, RECEIVED, MAR 13 , 1998, CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT." for the above referenced project. 1 have no comments or recommendations concerning this site plan review application at this time. I would like to request that you relay to the developers and designers my desire to meet with them as early as possible to discuss commercial building permit requirements. g:\safetylsaklmemoslplanlNo-comnt The City of Chanhassen. A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and 1 CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT P.O. Box 97 . 7610 Laredo Drive. Chanhassen, MN 55317 Bus. Phone 934-9191 . Minnewashta Station No.2. Phone 474-7094 CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTIVIENT POLICY L:.lbelin~ Fire Rated Walls General Numbers and/or letters shall be placed on all rated fire walls identifying their rating. Said numbers and/or letters shall be not less than 5 inches high x 3 inches wide, with a minimum Y. inch stroke and shall contrast with the background. Requirements are for new and existing construction. Occupancy Requirements This f'olicy is in effect for allcccupancies except Group R-3. Other Requirements I. Idenriiication shall be marked 10 feet from every' comer or change of direction and every 30 fee: thereafter. Identification shail be on both sides of interior walls. ..., Idenr:~ication can be hidden from plain view, i.e., above ceiling tiles or in attic spaces. All C't:-:er locations must be af'proved by one of the following: Fire yfarshal, Fire Inspe.:tor, Building Official. or Building Inspector. EX3.m~le: I hr (I hour fire wa[1) q::~/-- Chanhassen Fire Department Fire Prevention Policy #+ 1997 Date: 01/08/97 Revised: Page 1 of 1 :\;:-pr0\ ec: - ?~.~Iic Safety Direc:..'r 9. All systems must be designed to NFP A-13, 1991 edition and Chapter 6 Standards. All attic systems are to be spaced Jt a maximum 130 square foot coverage. 3/4" plastic piping \vill not be allowed at any time in attic SPo.cc. 10. All equipment installed in a fire protection system shall be UL listed or factory mutual approved for fire protection service. 11. ~ Firt:.. protection systems that are hydraulically calculated shall have a 5 psi safety factor at maximum system flow. 12. Acceptable water supplies for fire sprinkler systems are listed in NFP A-13, 1991 ed., Chapter 7. Swimming pools and ponds are not acceptable primary water supplies. 13. Pressure and gravity tanks shall be sized per the requirements contained in NFP A-13 and 22. Duration of the water supply shall match the hazard classification of the occupancy. 14. Include spec sheets for fire sprin.l:.ler heads - dI'): pipe/pre-action valving. 15. The definition of inspection is contained in ivfN Rule 7512.0100 Subpart 10, and staLes that inspection means: 1. Conducting a final acceptance test. 2. Trip test of dI')' pipe, deluge or preaction valves. 3. A test that an authority having jurisdiction requires tC?'be cOrlducted under the supervision of a contractor. Only licensed fire p'rotection contractors are pem1irted to conduct these tests. -1-. All other inspections including the inspectors test, main drain and other va!\'es are permirted under ~vN Rule 7512.0400 Subpart-2G, as maintenance activities and do not require a license as a fire protection contractor. 16. Per Section 904.3.2. and the 199-1- Unifom1 Building Code, an approved audible sprinkler flo\v alarm to alert the occupants shall be provided in the interior of the building in a normally occupied location. (Location must be approved by the Chanhassen Fire Marshal). 17. In existing systems, the following shall apply: '1 I. If any changes in the hydmulically most demanding area, or an addition of 20 or more heads, hydraldic calculations will need to be pro\'ided. If an addition or change of 20 or more heads to a system, a test \\il! need to bo::: completo:::d. Q~ y:^ 11 /~:sra ~ro\'ed-Public S::lfety Direcw[ Ch;lnhassen Fire Dep.'_rtn~ent Fire Prevention Oi\'i5:011 Policy #-1-0-1995 Date: 01112/95 Re\'ised: 03/1297 Page: 2 of 2 C I TV 0 F CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147. CHANHASSEN MINNESOTA 55317 . I (612) 937-1900 · FAX (612) 937-5739 CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICY FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS 1. Permits are required for all sprinkler work. 2. A minimum of four sets of plans are required. Send, or drop off plans and specifications and calculations to: Mark Littfin, Fire Marshal City of Chanhassen 690 Coulter Dri\'e Chanhassen. ~G\" 55317 3. Yard post indicators are required and must have tamper protection. 4. All control values must be pro\'ided with tamper protection, 5. All syst~ms tests must be witn~ssed by the Chanhassen Fire ~1arshal. Appointments can be made by calling th~ Fire Marshal at 937-1900, ext. 132, between 8:00 A:v1 and 4:00 P\L r.10nday through Friday. Please try to arrange tests at least 24 hours in advance. All revisions of25 he:1ds or more \\ill require a test. 6. j\1ain drains & inspector test connections must be piped to the outside atmosphere. 7. \\'ater 111~1V not be introduced into sprinkler piping from the City main until the Fire J\1arsr:,d witnesses a flush test per l\FP.-\ 13-8-2.1. 8. The City of Ch:mhassen h~1S aJopted Appendix E (see 1305.6905 appendix chapter 38 of the ~1BC). ChJ.n.l-.::ssen Fire Dep~lI1i11ent Fir~ Prevention Oi \'is;on Policy #40-1995 Date: 01112/95 Re\'ised: 03/12/97 Page 1 of2 C I TV 0 F CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE · P.O. BOX 147. CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900. FAX (612) 937-5739 CH.-\NHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICY MAXIMUM ALLOWED SIZE OF DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ON A COMBL'JA lION DOMESTIC/FIRE SPRL'lKLER SVPPL Y LINE 1. Domestic \vater line shall not be greater than 1/4 pipe size of the combination service water supply line. 2. 1 1/2" domestic off 6" line. 3. 2" domestic off 8" line. 4. 2 1/2 domestic off 10" line. Option 1: Domestic sizes may be increased if it can be calculated hy~au1ically that the demand by all domestic fixtures will not drop the fire spririkler water below its minimum gallonage required. Option 2: Combimtion domestic and five line service shall have an electric solenoid valve installed on the domestic side of the service. This vah'e shall be normally powered open and dose on loss of electric power or signal from the system water flow indicator. Must be approved by the Chanhassen Fire Marshal and Chanhassen Mechanical Inspector. ,~,n 7ci- Chanhassen Fire Department Water Line Sizing Policy #36-199'+ Date: 06/10/94 Revised: Page 1 of 1 Approved - Public Safery Director 4) Water main flushing shall be witnessed by the utility superintendem. a) Watermain flushing may be scheduled by contacting the utility superintendent at 474-2086. A 48 hour notice is required. b) The utility superintendent shall obtain a water sample for a bacteria test after the main flush and deliver to a testing company. The contractor shall be responsible for testing costs. Allow two weeks for testing results to be returned to the City. c) Upon receiving approval of the water sample test, the utility superintendent shall submit a copy to each plumbing inspector and turn water on to the tested and approved sections of the piping. 5) An additional supervised flush and flow test will be required and witnessed by the Fire ~farshal for services supplying fire suppression systems. The flush and now test shall be performed in accordance with 1991 edition of NFPA 13, Sec. 8- 2.1. Contact the Chanhassen Fire ylarshal at 937-1900. ext. 132. 6) \V:lterrnain installations shall comply with: a) Minnesota Plumbing Code. Chapter 4715 b) Chanhassen Engineering Department. Waterrnain Specifications c) National Fire Protection Association. Chapter 2.+ .. 7) Only authorized city employees are perrnirred to operate city water control valves. For water rum on or off contact the utilir:; superintendem by phone -P4-2086. A 2.1 hour notice is required. v./~ \ C6--?;rr /0 '---. f/ , Approved - Ptlbiic Safer}' Direct~'r Ins~ections Division \Vater Service Installation Po li-::y #34-1993 Date: 04/15'93 Rev:sed: 04d -:- 96 P:lge 2 of 2 C I TV 0 F CHANHASSEN 690 COULTErl DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147. CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900. FAX (612) 937-5739 \VA TER SERVICE INSTALL\. TION POLICY FOR CO\fMERCIAL k'ID INDUSTRIAL BT..:1LDINGS 1) The Inspections Division shall be responsible for issuance of permirs. No pennit shall be issued until :lpproval of plans have been obtained from the following: a) Engineering Department b) Fire 'farshal c) Minnesota Department of Health d) Plumbing Inspecwr 2) Plumbing inspecrors wii! do all installation inspections and wimess the hydrostatic and conducti\'iry tests. Inspection and Test Requiremems a) All pipe shall be inspected before being covered. Phone 937-1900. eX:. 31. to schedule inspections. A 24 hour norice is required. b) Condl.:ctivity resz is required. The pipe shall be subjected to a minimum 350 Jmp tesr for 1 period of nor less than 5 minutes. c) Hydrostatic test required. All pipe shall be subjected ro a hydrostatic pressure of 150 psi for 2 hours. Allowable pressure drop shall nor exceed 1 PSI. d) Pipe shall not be run under buildings - NFPA. 24.8-3.1. 3) tOron apr,oval of the hydro test. the plumbing inspector shall submir a copy of the inspec:ion report to me utility superimendemo The inspection report shall note whether t::e system is r~:ldy for main flush and drawing of warer sample for the bug test. Inspections Division Water Service InstJIlation Policy #34-l993 Dat~: 04/15'93 Revised: -+/17/96 P::.ge 1 of 2 CITY 0 F CHANHASSEN " 690 COULTER DRIVE · P.O. BOX 147 · CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 · FAX (612) 937-5739 CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICY General PREMISES IDENTIFICATION Numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Said numbers shall contrast with their background. Size and location of numbers shall be approved by one of the following Public Safety Director, Building Official, Building Inspector, Fire Marshal. Requirements are for new construction and existing buildings where no address numbers are posted. Other Requirements - Genef'aJ 1. Nt.:mbers shall be a contrasting color froir{the ba~~ground. 2. Nt.:mbers shall not be In script 3. It a str..Jcture Is not visible from the str~et, addltJonaC'numbers are requIred at th~ driveway entrance. Size and location must be approved. .:'1/ . 4. Nt.:mbers on mall box at driveway entrance may be a mInimum of 4". However, requIrement #3 must stili be met. s. Acmlnlstratlve authority may require additional numbers If deemed necessary. R eskje{,t1aJ R equ I remems (2 ()( less dwelT1nq unit) 1. Minimum height shall be 5 1/4". 2. Building pemilts will not be flnaledunless numbers are posted and approved by the Building Department Coml'ne('Cial Requirements ....... ," 1. MI.,!mum height shall be 12". 2. SL-:p Malls a. Multi tenant building \~ifl have minImum height requIrements of G". b. Address numbers shall ~e on the maIn. entrance and on all back doors. ::-:. ~.-:'f ~.. ........ : 3. If address numbers are I.:c.ated on a dldct"ry entry sIgn, additional numbers will be requIred on the bt.::ldlngs main entrance. ~ '~~~ ~,y-~- Chanhassen Fire Department Fire Prevention Policy #29-1992 Date: 06/15/92 Revised: Sa~ty Director Page 1 of 1 t.) PRIN7:D 0\ iiECYCLED PAPER Approved - Public C I TV 0 F CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147. CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 . FAX (612) 937-5739 CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICY REGARDING PRE-PLAN Prior to issuing the C.O., a pre-plan, site plan shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval. The following items shall be shown on the plan. 1) Size 11" x 17" (maximum) 2) Building footprint and building dimensions 3) Fire lanes and width of fire lanes 4) Water mains and their sizes, indicate looped or dead end 5) Fire hydrant locations 6) P.I.V. - Fire Department connection 7) Gas meter (shut-off), NSP (shut off) 8) Lock box location 9) Fire walls, if applicable 10) Roof vents, if applicable 11) Interior walls 12) Exterior doors 13). Location of fire alarm panel 14) Sprinkler riser location 15) Exterior L.P. storage, if applicable 16) Ea3. Mat. storage, if applicable 17) Underground storage tanks locations, if applicable 18) ~ype of construction walls/roof 19) Standpipes PLEASE NOTE: plans with topographical information, contour lines, easement lines, property lines, setbacks, right-of-way lines, headings, and other related lines or markings, are not acceptable, and will be rejected. . .' //,,, / // 'y/.... ;.;../:\~/~r _________ '\ ::..' ,~' , r '" ----= v..". ..~p~,rc'\le,i - Puo~ lC Sa f e:y~ Di~ec tor.... Chanhassen Fire Department Fire Prevention Policy #07-1991 Da t e : (: 1 / 15 / 91 Revised: 02/18/94 Page 1 of 1 C I TV 0 F CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147. CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900. FAX (612) 937-5739 CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICY REOUIREMENTS FOR FIRE LANE SIGNAGE NO PARKING FIRE LANE / '\ 7'0" : "- / 1. Signs to be a minimum of 12" x 18". 2. Red on white is preferred. 3. 3M or equal engineer's grade reflective sheeting on aluminum is preferred. 4. Wording shall be: NO Pp~tU<ING FIRE LANE 5. Signs shall be posted at each end of the fire lane and at least at 75 foot intervals along the .fire lane. 6. All signs shall be double sided facing the direction of travel. 7. Post shall be set back a minimum of 12" but not mere than 36" from the cu::-b. (NOT TO SCALE) - 8. A fire lane shall be required in GRADE front of fire dept. connections extending 5 feet on each side and along all areas designated by the Fire Chief. ANY DEVIATION FROM THE ABOVE PROCEDURES SH.'\LL BE SUB:UTTED IN \~ITING, WITH A SITE PLAN, FOR APPROVAL BY THE FIRE CHIEF. IT IS THE INTENTION OF THE FIRE DEPARTHENT TO ENSlJRE CONTINUITY THROUGHOUT THE CITY BY PROVIDING THESE PROCEDLKES FOR ~L~~~ING OF FIRE LANES. ~ ,,\ (%.y, Approved / 7:;v<- - Public Safety Director Chanhassen Fire Depa::-tment Fire p::-evention Policy =06-1991 Date: :/15/91 Revise=-: Page 1 of 1 ,. ~ J PRINTED 0>" RECYCLED PAPE;::; 9. High-piled combustible storage shall comply with the requirements of Article #81 of the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code. High-piled combustible storage is combustible materials on closely packed piles more than 15' in height or combustible materials on pallets or in racks more than 12' in height For certain special-hazard commodities such as rubber tires, plastics, some flammable liquids, idle pallets, etc. the critical pile height may be as low as 6 feet. _ 10. _. Fire lane signage shall be provided as required by the Fire Marshal. (See policy #06-1991). 11. Smoke detectors installed in lieu of 1 hour rated corridors under UBC section 33050, Exception #5 shall comply with Chanhassen Fire Department requirements for installation and system type. (See policy #05-1991). 12. Maximum allowed size of domestic water service on a combination domestic!f1re sprinkler supply line policy must be followed. (See policy #36-1994). Approved - Public Safety Director Chanhassen Fire Department Fire Prevention Policy #04-1991 Date: 11/22191 Revised: 12/23/94 Page 2 of 2 .~<7.I1~ - C I TV 0 F CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE · P,O, BOX 147. CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900. FAX (612) 937-5739 CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICY CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTES TO BE INCLUDED ON ALL SITE PLANS 1. Fire Marshal must witness the flushing of underground sprinkler service line, per NFP A 13-8-2.1. 2. A final inspection by the Fire Marshal before a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. 3. Fire Department access roads shall be provided on site during all phases of construction. The construction of these temporary roads will conform with the Chanhassen Fire Department requirements for temporary access roads at construction sites. Details are available. 4. Onsite fire hvdrants shall be provided and in operating conditio}1 during all phases or construction. 5. The use of liauefied petroleum 2as shall be in conformance with NFP A Standard 5S and the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code. A list of these requirements is a\3.ilable. (See policy #33-1993) 6. All fire detection and fire suppression svstems shall be monitored by an approved CL central station with a UL 71 Certificate issued on these systems before final occupancy is issued. 7. .-\n 11" x 14" As Built shall be provided to the Fire Department. The As Built shall be reproducible and acceptable to the Fire Marshal. (See policy #07-1991). 8. .-\11 approvecllock box shall be provided on the building for fire department use. . The lock box should be located by the Fire Department connection or as located 'by the Fire lvlarshal. Chanhassen Fire Department Fire Prevention Policy #04-1991 Date: 11/22/91 Revised: 12/23/9.+ Page 1 of 2 C I TV 0 F CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147 . CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 . FAX (612) 937-5739 CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICY EXTERIOR LIGHT AND HORN OVER FIRE DEPARTMENT SPRINKLER CONNECTION 1) Exterior Light and Horn for indicating Fire Department Sprinkler Connection shall be: a. Simplex model number Horn - 31T-115-R Light - wn3T-115-FR or b. Wheelock 7004-T c. Notifier 5542862 or equivalent per Fire Department approval. ~ff Approved - public Safety Director Chanhassen Fire Department Fire Prevention Policy: #02-1990 Date: 09/04/90 Revised: Page 1 of 1 ,tr ~J PRINTED ON RECYCl:D PAPER 7. The alarm systems shall be audible above the ambient noise level in all areas of the building. Alarm horns in each unit and all public areas, i.e. party room, pool, laundry rooms. Horns shall be directly connected to the building alarm systems and supervised. 8. The system shall be zoned per Chanhassen Fire Department requirements. 9. A U.L. 7 I Certificate is required on the system. The U.L. 71 Certificate shall be current and required forthe life of the alarm system and the life of the building. 10. A fully-function annunciator must be provided if the control panel is remotely located. I I. Health care, day care. and assembly occupancy notification must be by chimes, unless otherwise approved by the Fire Marshal. 12. All systems using standard horns or speakers must be set for temporal time. 13. The Chanhassen Fire Marshal must be contacted for final inspection of the completed job. The inspection will include: a. Test for proper operation of each device. b. Random testing for system trouble. c. Random testing for ground fault trouble. d. Correct operation on battery or standby power. eY2~ . Chanhassen Fire Department Fire Prevention Policy =01-[990 Date: 0'+/19/90 Revised: 05/09/96 Page 20f2 A.ppro\~d - Public Safer: Dire~to, C I TV 0 F CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147 . CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900. FAX (612) 937-5739 CHr\7'iHASSE"N FIRE DEPARTMENT POLlCY FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS 1. Fire alarm systems shall meet the requirements ofNFPA T2 1993 Edition. .., Shop drawings shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval. Shop drawings shall included the following. Approval and acceptance must comply with NFPA 72 1993 Edition 1-7.1. a. Connection diagrams. b. Specification data sheets. c. Schedules. for each device. including: location. function. zoning. d. Complete diagrams indicating: devices. components. intercon!l.ecting wiring, indicate !J.beling and descriptions on equipment. e. Floor plans indicating device and component locations. conduit. raceway and cable routes. f. Power connections. including source and branch circuit d::'..ta. g. Plan layout and details of: fire alarm control panel. fire ::.iarm subpanels transponders. annunciator. J. Wiring may be either a Class A or Class B Wiring System. (Exception: When a fire alann system is used to actuate an extinguishing system that protects a special hazard with high value? Class A circuitry will be required.) 4. All c,'mponents 0f the system must be CL. listed for their applic:!tion, com~ible and installed per ~PA i2E. 0iatiunal Electric Code and manufacturer's requirements. 5. Alarm veritication is required for all systems using smoke detectors. 6. \Vhe:1 Central Station nutific:.lcion is required or otherwise proviced. it must be through::l C.L. :isted communic::lwr. or ~FP.-\ Lsted Control Panel. .-\11 Cer1tral Stations must be L.L. :isted. Chanhassen Fire Deparrment Fire Pre\ention Pol icy =1) 1- 1990 Date: 0.: 19/90 Revised: 05/09/96 Page 1 or":2. Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #34-1993 Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #36-1994 Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #40-1995 Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #44-1997 If you have any comments or questions, please call me at 937-1990 ext. 262. G: \safety\gh \plrev98-4 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 GO' Center Drive, PO Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Phone 612.937.1900 General Fax 612.937.5739 Engineering Fax 612.937.9152 Public Safety Fax 612.934.2524 web www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Robert Generous, Senior Planner FROM: Greg Hayes, Fire Inspector DATE: March 31,1998 SUBJ: Request for site plan review for two office/industrial warehouse buildings up to 113,600 square feet located at the northeast comer of Century Boulevard and Coulter Boulevard on property zoned PUD Standard Development, Arboretum Business Park. Planning Case 98-4 Site Plan. I have reviewed the site plan for the above project. In order to comply with the Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division, I have the following fire code or city ordinance/policy requirements. The site plan is based on the available information submitted at this time. If additional plans or changes are submitted the appropriate code or policy items will be addressed. I. On the utility plan off the northwest comer of the Phase II part of the buildings a hydrant is shown directly in the center of the driveway off Century Boulevard. 2. Please provide a hydrant off of the North West and the North East comer of the phase 1 building. 3. Please provide hydrant off the West side of the phase 2 building. 4. Move the hydrant on the South side of the phase 2 building to the South West comer of the building. 5. Enclosed are the Chimhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division policies which will need to be reviewed and followed during the course of the project. These policies include: Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #01-1990 Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #02-1990 Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #04-1991 Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #06-1991 Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #07-1991 Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #29-1992 T!Je City of CIWlhassen. A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, ant< ~ a: ~ ... S fA ~ fA ~ .. ~ W .. .. ..a .. m ~ = ~ z~~ ~ :) ffi ... ..a ~ ~ CI~ ~ -' .. u ~ = ~ d: m~:c a: <I) ~ <~~ '" ~ a'<<t ; ~~z~ 0 ~mr:n ~ ~ ~u._ (') ~ . I: '~ ~ ~d:J: IOcgCII to: Q:t::c '" ... cg(')~ - ~ :I ~::::>z I ,;1 'H cOcO~ 10 ~ = .. ~t-~ ~I:' CO~_ - a a .. . !h'~ ~ :I ::l .~ ib Wu f;'{ ~ 1 II II Cl <I) in ':! II II ~ ." ." ;.:J a:: j ~ f!!~3: ~ b':lgt 0 ~ , , &ite~ 0 iil ~ <I) m 9~~ t- III I -* a: <( ILl 0 ii: u. 0 .J < a: ,t- 0 - =- b Q ~ .... .--' -' ILl a: (,)IO:!! 0 ILl · · 0: ii: t- -(f)... u. Z Cl)CI)cn 0 10 ILl t-t-:) t- o 000 9 .... _d~: " Cll "- .. " rl 0 Z ~ <( ...J l1. ;! I- lIi~ a:::: 1; i ~i <( oS: .. W f vf I : I z a:::: ~ 1 0 w ~ >-.. ~ z c _ ~ g !oJ W C < !oJ l- v en z ~ Z !oJ z o 1= ~ j!: It: o z_ z o ~ Iii ~ C) l:1 ...... Jj~ "'C'.". l:1 ,,,,.,,, Q) ;~if.i d ..,1\ H ~p. Q) 0 l:1'Q) ..... :> Q) Q) ti~ ~~~I ~ ~ IH~ u:r. lIa ::JU~ 2"" ~46~ (J)<( J l '! t' " .s IJ I C:S i v i- I I II ! .. ~~~ Id i III I ~-H .~ g! ~.:I. I ~ ~ il~ \ 1-00 zer W'!: 1: (L ~. % ~h 0 " wu i= % >G' ... 9 ~ w<{ > " 01: ~ lD 9 G' w :t oL '5 W r- <ri lD Z " 0 oL ill 0 ~ <ri I- '" ~ 0 <Jl 0 0 "" G' w S1 0 '" LL 0 0 >L II I>- W 0 '" G' '" 0 <{ l>- I>- 0- '" II 0 ~ '" <Jl I I>- <Jl '" '" w- % 0 5j~ 0 "- i= '" ... % iil~ > 0 ~ i= ... S II W > ~ 1-. w w- G' .. o~ Jll<{ G'U <{<Jl % % % 0 0 0 i= i= i= ... ... ... > > > ~ % ~ ~ w 0 w w i= :t ... r- r- r- > '" '" '" ~ w ... 0 3 W % W i :t r- '" 0 % i. , i , , % 0 i= ... > ~ w r- '" w 3 I ; I i. , , , J:~fZ'~"f'^.t1'J!::;L=_~ _ _.___ _~:X;UL"--<.C:';';~~:: I I B~ II~ ~ ;1 I I~ ~ ~ t I . n ~ I II I I I I I I I I I / I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I f I f f f f f I / t~. a~1 !JI& / I \ , ~ en I <<) ~-O fDgl h'~ := ~ 0 ~~ s;i~1 II" 0 Q '-J.!~ ~~i ui: 0 ~ ~ o D_ B. jg & III L] sil. II Z I fin r ~I d .! <<; 0 = I . I 1~8fl It I III ~II ~~ d. ': It;!' -.. <. ~ "h1Ih- ~. g i"il'l i I 'III i b II: i. .1,1 ~ :S!!!!~:l! 11111111111 \ \ I f f f f f f I f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f I I f f f f f / I f f f f f I I I I I I I I I I I : ( I I I \ t 1 . 1 ! ~ ;! i I I ~~ II~ ~ ;1 I d 5 I II .Im .! .! : I . I i~I" It. I" III~:.. ~: I!', ... ~ '1111115-. - Q :Lli~11 I p. p! II ~ ..' II ; :!!!!!i~i! II;hll;UI o I ~. .. t iI II '1 I' e I I if II Il!] B I I ~ o \ \ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I / I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I (~ t!. J~~ B o <0 ~'o 8; '~8 Q 9:- ~ ~ ~~~! ;I:l ~5~ II ii ;;;;~g U Ir -------------------------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I / ,~ I' fj '::'1 c./:'l ' I I I I E:: --1 1-~-:.'-'-t.t..JJJ I I L. -l --., I ....__.J. J.l. I I 1..:: '~;J / ~-~ ~~_':~ I : t:'l,i :::/1 I- i I Ifj'lij! ;! I, L.:: '~.J / Q.. / / /' , I: ]'1 ; J 1 ! # If f}/ i ~ / !: r ,f::: ~.J / IJJ / / / ,..:: ::::/ !r / / "--':J ::;: / S / / r''-I II:. I I --) I I I I, \,:'''k\~----- .... / / /' y...... CJ I 7"''''''''r-~-''''--.... , / \""('-;,....... I J I I I '~'77~ ----, _ I I (. ) I l.~_ } (~~~J , '.../.../J.llLLL./ I r-_... - "'/-1 '.J,.J -__, -- -- -" FROM CITY OF CHRHHRSSEH 03.16.1998 16:00 P. 3 b: f3,4~ M4iI Pl~~ - /A/MI ~ ~ td( tl; /Jf:if?,4.5" WETLANDS p ~S~NT : YES >( NO ~ ~?/J7Te;D PAESENTio I~d puc;' - 4'~/oed ~de - //14tft5/r/d REQUESTeb dNiNCl l/~hC8 /P'J/&4~~ PRESENT ~IU~E OeSIGNAtlON REQUESTeb ~~~ Use OeSIGNATION ~EASON F~ f:1~ FlEOueST : ThIs appllca~~; u~t I?e comp~t$d In full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all Information and plana r ' ul e ~y applicable City Otdlnance provisions. Before filing this application. you should confer wlth the Planning Department 0 rtn'ne the speclflc ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. notice of BPpll tl, n~e'lcI8ncles shall ~ mailed to the applicant wtthln ten business days of application. ThIS 18 to certIfY. t~~at: I am making appll~tlon for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with III City requl~ e tl with regard to this request. This application should be processed In my name and I am the party whom the C~y Ih04ld t at regarding any m.tter pettalnlng to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Own.r' :..~ !Ieafe Cer'tlftcate of ",ltle. Abstract of Title or purchase agreement). or I am the authorized person to make this application np ihe fee owner has also sIgned thIs applicatIon. 1 wlll keep tn HfOrmed of the de~dllnes for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand "a d~ItIOnal fees, may ~ charged for consulting fees. feasibility studies. etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to . ed wIth the study. The documents and Information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my kno~', r! o i' I The dri he"b~~88 the applicant t~at development review cannot be completed within 60 days due to public hearing requlrementt a ency revlew. Th"refore. the city 18 notIfying the applicant that the city requIres an automatic eo day eX1enslon 10.r elppi'nent revieW. [)evelopmen.t revIew shall be completed within 120 days unless addItional review extenalons are ': tf)vtd by the .p'pllca~t. ~ ' I' //" 0~ ' . /: ' .:-;:... /y' / - : .5 /~ ~b ?~ 3;/7(1; zt. 'Date Fee Paid 7/ i~go , ---- Receipt No. ;2 '1',.;J , -- SIgna1ure of F AppIlca1lon A. The appllcant ~o*ld contact .taff fOf a copy of the staff report which will be available on Friday prior to the meeting. If not contact , a, copy of the report will be mailed to the applicant'. add,.... FROM CITY OF CHRHHRSSEH I I L 'I i I : 03.16.1998 15159 P. 2 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 880 COUL TEFl DRIVE CHANHASSEN. MN 85317 (812) 137-"00 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION ADDRESS: nit Development. ADDRESS: /36/tl 5. uP. ~ / tJ / tl/q ~u::t4 J1tV ~~-3q / TELEPHONE: q J3 565b _ Temporary Sales PermIt _ Vacation of ROW/Easements _ Varlance _ Wetland Alteration PermIt _ Zoning Appeal _ Zoning Ordinance Amendment _ NotlflcaUon Sign ..L Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney COlt"" ~50CU~SPRNAONARNYAP~~8 and Bound., $400 MInor SUB) TOTAL FEE S 'I)D ~,)Z/~ d'1J ~ I ;;6J. I/f:? , i' A 'II ,0 411 property owner. within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must be Included with the ._pl, tl~n.. . i I Bull I~g ~.terl81 samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. -Tw;iY~l~ fu~1 Ilz. ~!copl.. of the plln. must be submitted. Including In 8Va" X 11" reduced copyof IrIn I~r~ncy for "~~h8Dt. , . .. Ea ~w will be required for other Ippll~tlon. through the development contract NOTE . Whe~ multiple applications are processed. the approprIate fee shall be charged for each application. I ! .' Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition April 15, 1998 Page 11 13. Additional evergreens shall be added to the northern and southern landscape peninsulas at the comers of the building and at the southwest comer of the site to provide more screening of the loading areas from the street. 14. Each landscape peninsula must have one shade tree. Landscape peninsulas less than 10 feet in width must have aeration tubing installed. 15. The applicant shall install foundation plantings around the perimeter of the building as required by city ordinance. 16. On the utility plan, off the northwest comer of the Phase II part of the buildings, a hydrant is shown directly in the center of the driveway off Century Boulevard. Please provide a hydrant off of the northwest and the northeast comer of the phase 1 building. Please provide hydrant off the west side of the phase 2 building. Move the hydrant on the south side of the phase 2 building to the southwest comer of the building. 17. Chanhassen Fire DepartmentlFire Prevention Division policies will need to be reviewed and followed during the course of the project." A TT ACHMENTS 1. Development Review Application 2. Reduced Site Plan and Landscaping Plan 50,400 sq. ft. Building 3. Reduced Site Plan and Landscaping Plan 113,600 sq. ft. Building 4. Reduced Building Elevations 50,400 and 113,600 sq. ft. Buildings 5. Reduced Building Elevation Steiner Heartland 6. Arboretum Business Park PUD Plan 7. Memo from Greg Hayes to Robert Generous dated 3/31/98 8. Memo from Steve Kirchman to Bob Generous dated 4/6/98 9. Memo from Dave Hempel to Bob Generous dated 4/8/98 10. Plans dated March 10, 1998 11. Planning Commission Minutes of 4/15/98 g:\plan\bg\arboretum business park bldg 2.doc Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition April 15, 1998 Page 10 2. The building entrances shall project out from the body of the building to provide significant visual relief in a manner and at intervals in keeping with the size, mass, and scale of the wall and its views from public streets. 3. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary security to guarantee erosion control, site restoration and landscaping. 4. The site plans shall be redesigned to reflect the proposed street and utility improvements proposed with Phase I of the City's public improvement project for Arboretum Business Park. 5. All driveway access points shall be constructed in accordance with the City's industrial driveway detail plate No. 5207. Drive aisle widths to the truck parking lot shall be increased to 30 feet wide and the turning radiuses onto Coulter Boulevard expanded to accommodate truck turning movements. 6. Erosion control fence shall be installed and maintained around the downstream side of the site until all disturbed areas have been revegetated and removal is authorized by the City. Storm sewer inlets shall be protected with silt fence, hay bales and/or rock filter dikes until the parking lot has been paved with a bituminous surface. 7. The City's boulevards must be restored with sod. The landscaping plan shall incorporate landscape material suitable for a 2: 1 slope. 8. Site plan approval is contingent upon the City authorizing and awarding a project for Phase II public improvements for Arboretum Business Park and final plat approval for Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition. 9. Detailed storm drainage calculations including drainage area maps for a IO-year, 24-hour storm event shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. 10. Commencement of construction for this development is contingent on the recording of a final plat for Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition. 11. The applicant shall provide areas for bicycle parking and storage on site. 12. The applicant shall work with staff to revise the landscape plan to meet minimum requirements for parking lot landscape, boulevard trees and buffer yard plantings as specified in the staff report. Alternate 1 would require a minimum of27 shade trees, 24 ornamental or conifer trees, and 36 shrubs. Alternate 2 would require a minimum of 63 shade trees, 48 ornamental or conifer trees, and 72 shrubs. The buffer yard on the west of the site shall incorporate native grasses and wildflower mix as ground cover. Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition April 15, 1998 Page 9 18. All roof mounted equipment shall be screened with walls of compatible appearing material or camouflaged to blend in the building or background. 19. The applicant and staff shall present to City Council a detailed presentation of all pedestrian and trail connections with the site. The Planning Commission explained that they were not against the developer having a larger building on the site. Rather, they did not like the architectural style ofthe building. They stated, "we're becoming really weary of how Chanhassen is starting to look with all these warehouses." If the developer wants a larger building, they should try additional architectural treatments, rather than continuing the same long expanse of wall, broken intermittently by entrance features, but no other significant relief. The Planning Commission had an expectation that development within the PUD would be of a higher quality and incorporate additional architectural features than in standard industrial warehouse areas. They felt that the larger building did not meet that expectation. Staff believes that condition 18 is already incorporated in the design standards for Arboretum Business Park by standard e. Building Materials and Design which contains this same language as well as a prohibition against the use of wood screen fences. In addition, rather than adding condition 19 to the conditions of approval (which would duplicate Design Standard i. 2.), staff will present the City Council with our recommendation for trail connections. Trails shall be located on the east side of Century Boulevard and on the south side of the Coulter Boulevard extension west of Century Boulevard. Staff is recommending that the applicant provide a pedestrian connection from the southeast comer of the building to the intersection of Century Boulevard and Coulter Boulevard west of Century Boulevard. Pedestrians could then cross to the south side of Coulter Boulevard and use the cross walk to cross Century Boulevard. Within . ~.he site, a pedestrian area will be provided between the building and the parking lot. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the following motion: "The City Council approves Site Plan #98-4 for a 50,400 sq. ft. building or a 113,600 sq. ft. building, site plan prepared by Smucker Architects dated March 10, 1998, subject to the following conditions: 1. The development must comply with the Development Design Standards for Arboretum Business Park. Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition April 15, 1998 Page 8 (5) Creation of functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: a. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; b. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; c. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and d. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. (6) Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. Finding: Subject to the revisions contained in the staff report, the proposed site plan is consistent with all plans and specifications and development design standards for the Arboretum Business Park Planned Unit Development. PLANNING COMMISSION UPDATE As part of their presentation to the Planning Commission, the developer incorporated staff s recommendation to project the entrance features (five feet) out from the face of the building. This was exactly what staff envisioned. The change created a varied facade breaking up the flat surface of the building and at the same time differentiating this building from the Heartland building to the south. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 15, 1998 to review the proposed site planes). A motion to approve the 50,400 square foot building or the 113,600 square foot building failed unanimously. A second motion was made recommending approval of the 50,400 square foot building only. The second motion passed unanimously subject to the conditions of the staff report and the addition of conditions: Final Plat - Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition May 11, 1998 Page 9 creeks. Individual storm sewer calculations between each catch basin segment will also be required to determine if sufficient catch basins are being utilized. In addition, water quality ponding design calculations shall be based on Walker's Pondnet model. *This condition has been met. 18. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies, i.e. Carver County, Watershed District, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, Health Department, Minnesota Pollution control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Army Corps of Engineers and Minnesota Department of Transportation and comply with their conditions of approval. *This condition still applies. 19. Fire hydrants shall be incorporated per the Fire Marshal's recommendations. *This condition still applies. a) 20. The appropriate drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated on the final plat for all utilities and ponding areas lying outside the right-of-way. The easement width shall be a minimum of 20 feet wide. Consideration should also be given for access for maintenance of the ponding areas. *This condition still applies. 21. No berming or landscaping will be allowed within the right-of-way except landscaping along the frontage road in accordance with the Trunk Highway 5 Corridor Study. *This condition still applies. 22. The lowest floor or opening elevation of all buildings shall be a minimum of2 feet above the 100-year high water level. *This condition still applies. 23. Stormwater ponds must have side slopes of 10: 1 for the first ten feet at the normal water level and no more than 3:1 thereafter or 4:1 throughout for safety purposes. *This condition is not applicable to this phase. Final Plat - Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition May 11, 1998 Page 10 24. The applicant shall report to the City Engineer the location of any drain tiles found during construction and shall relocate or abandon the drain tile as directed by the City Engineer. *This condition still applies. 25. Final grades adjacent to Trunk Highways 41 and 5 will be subject to review and approval of MnDOT for compatibility with the future widening of Trunk Highway 5. *This condition has been modified to include T.H. 41. 26. Increase landscape plantings to include 400 trees in addition to buffer yard plantings and individual site plan landscaping. *This condition shall be modified as follows: Landscaping along Highway 41 shall comply with Buffer yard standard C (as per city code). Century Boulevard shall comply with Buffer yard standard B. The master landscape plan for the Arboretum Business Park PUD shall be the design guide for all of the specific site landscape developments. Each lot must present a landscape plan for approval with the site plan review process. 27. A 10' clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, NSP, US West, Cable TV, and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance 9-1. *This condition still applies. 28. Submit street names to Chanhassen Fire Marshal and Chanhassen Building Official for review and approval. *This condition has been met (Coulter Boulevard and Century Boulevard). 29. Existing structures on the property which may be demolished require a demolition permit. Proof of septic and well systems that are abandoned are required. *This condition still applies. 30. The permitted uses outlined on pages 7 and 8 of the staff report be amended as follows: Institutional be deleted. Restaurant be permitted on either Lot 1, Block 3 or Lot 4, Block 4. Convenience store with or without gas pumps be permitted on Lot 1 or Lot 2, Block 1 only. Lot 5, Block 4, the intent of the city is that there be a major corporate user, or high end Final Plat - Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition May 11, 1998 Page 11 industrial with limited warehousing. *The changes to the standards have been made. This condition shall be modified as follows: The project and individual site users must comply with the development design standards incorporated herein as Exhibit C of the development contract. The issue over the parkland dedication be brought back before the Council with final recommendations and numbers for consideration and agreement by the Council. *This condition shall be modified as follows: 31. Full trail fees shall be collected per city ordinance for all lots in the Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition. Staff is also recommending the addition of the following condition due to the city undertaking the utility and street improvements necessary to undertake this project: 32. The developer agrees to waive any and all procedural or substantive objections to the special assessments resulting from Project No. 97-lD improvements including, but not limited to, hearing requirements and that the assessments as outlined in the feasibility study for Phase III improvements of Project No. 97-1 (Coulter Boulevard Phase III) exceeds the benefit to the property platted as Arboretum Business Park. The assessment interest rate will be bond sale rate plus 1 Y2%, then rounded up to the nearest Y2%. The assessment payback is not known yet but will be a minimum of 5 years. Staff is recommending the following conditions be added after review of the development proposal for this phase of the project: 33. The developer shall dedicate to the city a temporary turnaround easement over Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2 to construct a turnaround with a 43-foot radius at the end of Coulter Boulevard. The easement shall automatically expire with the connection of Coulter Boulevard to Trunk Highway 41. 34. A cross-access easement shall be dedicated to the city over Lots 1 and 2, Block 2 for access to the water tower site (Outlot A). 35. All driveway access points shall be constructed in accordance with the City's industrial driveway detail plate No. 5207. Final Plat - Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition May 11, 1998 Page 12 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the following motion: "The City Council approves PUD #92-6 granting Final Plat approval for Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition creating six lots and three outlots, and associated right of way (plans prepared by Schoell & Madsen, Inc.) subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant built NURP ponds for the entire site with the first phase of the development. Credits from these NURP ponds provided the applicant with a surplus of SWMP credits. The applicant is responsible for a water quantity fee of$126,614.00 with this phase of the development. 2. The grading plan shall be revised to incorporate the following items: MnDOT's review comments shall be incorporated into the final grading and development plan. 3. Final plat approval shall be conditioned upon the City awarding a bid for construction of Public Improvement Project 97-1-D. 4. Coulter Boulevard, west of Century Boulevard, will be restricted to a right-inlright-out only at Trunk Highway 41. All lots shall access onto interior streets and not Trunk Highways 41 or 5. 5. The developer shall enter into Addendum B to the Development Contract/PUD Agreement for Arboretum Business Park and provide a financial security in the form of a letter of credit to guarantee site grading of Century and Coulter Boulevards, administration fees, erosion control measures, and site restoration. Upon execution of the addendum and receipt of the necessary fees and permits, i.e. Watershed, NPDES, the developer may proceed with site grading operations. 6. Type ill erosion control fencing will be required adjacent to wetland areas. Additional erosion control fence may be necessary at the toe of steep slope areas and adjacent to storm water ponds after the grading has been completed. 7. Erosion control blankets will be required on all slopes greater than 3: 1. Revegetation of the exposed slopes shall occur immediately after grading is completed. 8. All areas disturbed as a result of construction activities shall be immediately restored with seed and disc-mulched or wood fiber blanket or sod after completion of each activity in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook. Final Plat - Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition May 11, 1998 Page 13 9. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies, i.e. Carver County, Watershed District, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, Health Department, Minnesota Pollution control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Army Corps of Engineers and Minnesota Department of Transportation and comply with their conditions of approval. 10. Fire hydrants shall be incorporated per the Fire Marshal's recommendations. 11. The appropriate drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated on the final plat for all utilities and ponding areas lying outside the right-of-way. The easement width shall be a minimum of 20 feet wide. Consideration should also be given for access for maintenance of the ponding areas. 12. No berming or landscaping will be allowed within the right-of-way except landscaping along the frontage road in accordance with the Trunk Highway 5 Corridor Study. 13. The lowest floor or opening elevation of all buildings shall be a minimum of 2 feet above the 1 OO-year high water level. 14. The applicant shall report to the City Engineer the location of any drain tiles found during construction and shall relocate or abandon the drain-tile as directed by the City Engineer. 15. Final grades adjacent to Trunk Highways 41 and 5 will be subject to review and approval of MnDOT for compatibility with the future widening of Trunk Highway 5 and Trunk Highway 41. 16. Landscaping along Highway 41 shall comply with Buffer yard standard C (as per city code). Century Boulevard shall comply with Buffer yard standard B. The master landscape plan for the Arboretum Business Park PUD shall be the design guide for all of the specific site landscape developments. Each lot must present a landscape plan for approval with the site plan reVIew process. 17. A 10' clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, NSP, US West, Cable TV, and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance 9-1. 18. Existing structures on the property which may be demolished require a demolition permit. Proof of septic and well systems that are abandoned are required. Final Plat - Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition May 11, 1998 Page 14 19. The project and individual site users must comply with the development design standards incorporated herein as Exhibit C of the development contract. 20. Full trail fees shall be collected per city ordinance for all lots in the Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition. 21. The developer agrees to waive any and all procedural or substantive objections to the special assessments resulting from Project No. 97-1D improvements including, but not limited to, hearing requirements and that the assessments as outlined in the feasibility study for Phase III improvements of Project No. 97-1 (Coulter Boulevard Phase III) exceeds the benefit to the property platted as Arboretum Business Park. The assessment interest rate will be bond sale rate plus 1 Y2%, then rounded up to the nearest Y2%. The assessment payback is not known yet but will be a minimum of 5 years. 22. The developer shall dedicate to the City a temporary turnaround easement over Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2 to construct a turnaround with a 43-foot radius at the end of Coulter Boulevard. The easement shall automatically expire with the connection of Coulter Boulevard to Trunk Highway 41. 23. A cross-access easement shall be dedicated to the City over Lots 1 and 2, Block 2 for access to the water tower site (Outlot A). 24. All driveway access points shall be constructed in accordance with the City's industrial driveway detail plate No. 5207." ATTACHMENTS . 1. Exhibit C, Development Design Standards 2. Breakdown of Administrative Fees dated 5/5/98 3. Memo from Dave Hempel dated 5/5/98 4. Final grading plan 5. Final plat g:\plan\bg\arborelum business park 2nd add fp.doc Exhibit C DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS Development Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD light industrial/office park. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. All utilities are required to be placed underground. Each lot proposed for development shall proceed through site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. Photo-composite images of proposed development adjacent to Highways 5 and 41 shall be submitted as part of the review process. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Other uses may be permitted as listed below if they are ancillary to a principal use in the development. Commercial/retail uses are prohibited expect those uses specifically noted below. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone should be limited to light industrial, warehousing, and office as defined below. The uses shall be limited to those as defined herein. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the City Council shall make that interpretation. Permitted uses may be allowed on the different Blocks and Lots for which they are specified below. Light Industrial- The manufacturing, compounding, processing, assembling, packaging, or testing of goods or equipment or research activities entirely within an enclosed structure, with no outside storage. There shall be negligible impact upon the surrounding environment by noise, vibration, smoke, dust or pollutants. (Lots 3, 4, and 5, Block 1; Lot 1, Block 2; Lots 1,2, and 3, Block 4; and the Wrase property) Warehousing - Means the commercial storage of merchandise and personal property. (Lots 3, 4, and 5, Block 1; and Lots 1,2, and 3, Block 4) Office - Professional and business office. (Lots 1,2,3,4, and 5, Blockl; Lot 1, Block 2; Lot 1, Block 3; Lotsl, 2, 3,4, and 5, Block 4; and the Wrase property) Health Services- establishments primarily engaged in furnishing medical, surgical and other health services to persons. (Lots 1 and 2, Block 1; Lot 1, Block 3; and Lot 4, Block 4) Conferences/Convention Center - establishments designed to accommodate people in assembly, providing conference and meeting services to individuals, groups, and organizations. (Lot 5, Block 4) Indoor RecreationIHealth Club - establishments engaged in operating reducing and other health clubs, spas, and similar facilities featuring exercise and other physical fitness conditioning. (Lot 1, Block 3; and Lot 4, Block 4) HoteVMotel- commercial establishments engaged in furnishing lodging, or lodging and meals, to the general public. (Lot 1, Block 3; and Lot 4, Block 4) Utility Services - Water towers and reservoir. (Lots 3, 4, and 5, Block 1; Lots 1,2, and 3, Block 4; and the Wrase property) Commercial uses (permitted on lots specified as commercial in development standards tabulation box) 1. Restaurant, permitted on Lot 1, Block 3 or Lot 4, Block 4. (One stand alone restaurant.) 2. Convenience store with or without gas pumps, not to exceed 12,000 square feet, on Lot 1 or 2, Block 1, only. (One convenience store.) 3. Banks, with or without drive up windows 4. Day Care - establishments providing for the care and supervision of infants and children on a daily basis. (Lots 1 and 2, Block 1; Lot 1, Block 3; and Lot 4, Block 4) Ancillary Uses (in conjunction with and integral to a primary use) 1. Fast Food (no drive-through and only in conjunction with and integral to a convenience store). 2. Restaurant (only in conjunction with hotel/motel or convention/conference center). 3. Showroom - showroom type display area for products stored or manufactured on-site provided that no more than 20 percent of the floor space is used for such display and sales. 4. Telecommunication Towers and Antennas 5. Car wash, in conjunction with convenience store. 6. Day Care Prohibited uses . Contractors Yard . LumberYard . Home Improvement/Bui1ding Supply . Garden Center . Auto related including sales and repair . Home furnishings and equipment stores . General Merchandise Store c. Setbacks The development is regulated by the Highway 5 and the PUD Standards. There are no minimum requirements for setbacks on interior lot lines in the PUD zone. The following setbacks shall apply: Street Frontage Minimum Setback Buildin arkin Hwys. 5 & 41 70/50 Coulter & North South Road 50/20 82n & West Local 30/20 NA *Lot 5, Block 4, must only meet the maximum setback on one Highway frontage. The average hard surface coverage does not include Outlots A and B. The PUD standard for hard surface coverage is 70% for office and industrial uses. Anyone site/lot can exceed the 70 percent requirement but in no case can the entire finished development exceed 70 percent. d. Development Standards Tabulation Box 1. Building Area LOT/USE Lot 3, Block 1 Lot 4, Block 1 Lot 5, Block 1 Lot 1, Block 4 Lot 2, Block 4 Lot 3, Block 4 Lot 1, Block 2 Lot 5, Block 4 Wrase 10.02 5.45 4.41 4.38 5.40 8.98 12.23 23.20 2.64 Building Size/F AR s uare feet) 131,006 71,218 57,688 57,199 70,597 117,371 159,822 (.4 FAR) 404,279 35,500 Lot I, Block I Lot 2, Blockl Lot 4, Block 4 Office/Hotel LotI, Block 3 Restaurant/Office 11,746/23,520 15,180/30,320 26,536/53,060 (.10FAR) 27937 / 83,770 5/1000) 59 (411000) 61 (5/1000) 133 (1611000) 447 (Note: Lot and Block numbers based on preliminary plat configuration) Commercial sites may develop as office-industrial uses. Square footage for individual lots may be reallocated within the development, by type, provided the maximum square footage is not exceeded. Building Square Footage Breakdown Office 31% 368,000/(432,000) Light Industrial 31% 368,000/(432,000) Warehouse 31% 368,000/(432,000) Commercial 7% 81,000/(0) Total 100% 1,186,000 / (1,295,000) *includes the Wrase property. () represents conversion of commercial uses to office- industrial uses 2. More than one (I) principal structure may be placed on one (1) platted lot. 3. Building height shall be limit 3 stories or 40 feet. 4. Lot 5, Block 4, is intended to accommodate a major corporate headquarters or office, research, high end manufacturing with limited warehousing type user. While the majority of the development is based on 30 percent office space, Lot 5 must have a minimum of 40 percent office use and include multi-story building( s). e. Building Materials and Design I. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. All mechanical equipment shall be screened with material compatible to the building. 2. All materials shall be of high quality and durable. Masonry material shall be used. Color shall be introduced through colored block or panels and not painted cinder block. 3. Brick may be used and must be approved to assure uniformity. 4. Block shall have a weathered face or be polished, fluted, or broken face. 5. Concrete may be poured in place, tilt-up or pre-cast, and shall be finished in stone, textured or coated. 6. Metal siding will not be approved except as support material to one of the above materials or curtain wall on office components or, as trim or as HV AC screen. 7. All accessory structures shall be designed to be compatible with the primary structure. 8. All roof mounted equipment shall be screened by walls of compatible appearing material or camouflaged to blend into the building or background. Wood screen fences are prohibited. All exterior process machinery, tanks, etc., are to be fully screened by compatible materials. 9. The use oflarge unadorned, pre-stressed concrete panels and concrete block shall be prohibited. Acceptable materials will incorporate textured surfaces, exposed aggregate and/or other patterning. All walls shall be given added architectural interest through building design or appropriate landscaping. The buildings shall have varied and interesting detailing. The use of large unadorned, concrete panels and concrete block, or a solid wall unrelieved by architectural detailing, such as change in materials, change in color, fenestrations, or other significant visual relief provided in a manner or at intervals in keeping with the size, mass, and scale of the wall and its views from public ways shall be prohibited. Acceptable materials will incorporate textured surfaces, exposed aggregate and/or other patterning. All walls shall be given added architectural interest through building design or appropriate landscaping. 10. Space for recycling shall be provided in the interior of all principal structures or within an enclosure for all developments in the Business Center. 11 Each buildings shall contain one or more pitched roof elements depending on scale and type of building, or other architectural treatments such as towers, arches, vaults, entryway projections, canopies and detailing to add additional interest and articulation to structures. 12. There shall be no underdeveloped sides of buildings visible from public right-of-ways. All elevations visible from the street shall receive nearly equal treatment and visual qualities. f. Site Landscaping and Screening 1. Landscaping along Highways 41 and 5 shall comply with Buffer yard standard C (as per city code). Coulter Boulevard, the north south street, and West 82nd Street shall comply with Buffer yard standard B. The master landscape plan for the Arboretum Business Park PUD shall be the design guide for all of the specific site landscape developments. Each lot must present a landscape plan for approval with the site plan review process. 2. Storage of material outdoors is prohibited unless it has been approved under site plan review. All approved outdoor storage must be screened with masonry fences and/or landscaping. 3. Undulating or angular berms or elevation changes of3' in height shall be placed along Coulter Boulevard, and the North/ South Street. The berms shall be sodded or seeded at the conclusion of each project Phase grading and utility construction. The required buffer landscaping may be installed incrementally, but it shall be required where it is deemed necessary to screen any proposed development. All required boulevard landscaping shall be sodded. 4. Loading areas shall be screened 100 percent year round from public right-of-ways. Wing walls may be required where deemed appropriate. g. Sign age 1. All freestanding signs be limited to monument signs. The sign shall not exceed eighty (80) square feet in sign display area nor be greater than eight (8) feet in height. The sign treatment is an element of the architecture and thus should reflect with the quality of the development. The signs should be consistent in color, size, and material throughout the development. The applicant should submit a sign package for staff review. 2. Each property shall be allowed one monument sign per street frontage. 3. The signage will have consistency throughout the development. A common theme will be introduced at the development's entrance monument and will be used throughout. 4. Consistency in signage shall relate to color, size, materials, and heights. 5. The Gateway PUD shall be permitted two Gateway business identification signs. One sign per project entrance, at West 82nd and the north/south road and at Highway 41 and the westerly roadway, shall be permitted. Said sign shall not exceed 80 square feet in sign area nor be greater than eight feet in height. 6. Wall sign shall be permitted per city ordinance for industrial office park site. 7. All signs shall require a separate sign permit. 8. Signage for the main entrance on Highway 5 and the north/south road shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission and City Council. h. Lighting 1. Lighting for the interior of the business center should be consistent throughout the development. The applicant's proposal is consistent with the lighting standards for the PUD ordinance. The plans do not provide for street lighting. As with previous industrial parks/roadways, the City has required the developer to install street lights throughout the street system. The street lights should be designed consistent with the existing lighting along the existing Coulter Boulevard. 2. A decorative, shoe box fixture (high pressure sodium vapor lamps) with a square ornamental pole shall be used throughout the development area for area lighting. 3 Lighting equipment similar to what is mounted in the public street right-of-ways shall be used in the private areas. 4. All light fixtures shall be shielded. Light level for site lighting shall be no more than 1/2 candle at the property line. This does not apply to street lighting. i. Alternative Access 1. Each site shall accommodate transit service within the individual development whenever possible. 2. Pedestrian access shall be provided from each site to the public sidewalk and trail system. 3. The developer and site users shall promote and encourage Traffic Demand Management Strategies. 4. Each site shall provide areas for bicycle parking and storage. CITY OF CHANHASSEN ARBORETUM BUSINESS PARK 2ND ADDITION PROJECT NO. 98-10 BREAKDOWN OF ADMINISTRATION FEES - 5/5/98 Estimated Total Cost of Public Improvements ................................................................... $ 60,000.00 - 3% of Public Improvement Costs (Under $500,000)........................................................ $ 1,800.00 - Final Plat Process (Escrow For Attorney Fee for Review and Recording of Plat and Development Contract) .......... ...... ........ ........ ...... ...... ....... ........ ............ ............. $ 400.00 - Recording Fees a. Addendum"B" to Development Contract/PUD Agreement ............................... $ b. Plat Filing ............ ............ ........ ............... ........ ............. ...... ........... ........... ...... ...... $ c. Turnaround Easement. ........... ............................ ...................... .......... ................. $ 30.00 30.00 30.00 - 1/3 Trail Fees (28.1 acres at $1,500 per acre/3)................................................................. $ 14,050.00 - SWMP Fees (Water Quantity - 29.04 Acres x 4,360 per acre)......................................... $126,614.00 - GIS Fees ($25 per plat and $10 per parcel) ...................................................................... $ 115.00 TOT AL ADMINISTRATION FEES ............................................................................. $143,fl69..00 c: Todd Hoffman, Park & Recreation Director Phillip Elkin, Water Resources Coordinator Fred Richter, Steiner Development \'dsl\vol2\eng\lc\arboretum 2nd.fee.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN '0 City Center Drive, PO Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Phone 612.937.1900 General Fax 612.937.5139 :ngineering Fax 612.937.9152 'ub/ic Safety Fax 612.934.2524 \Veb www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Bob Generous, Senior Planner Dave Hempel, Assistant City Engineer * FROM: DATE: May 5, 1998 SUBJ: Review of Final Plat - Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition Project No. 98-10 Upon review of the final plat documents prepared by Schoell & Madson, Inc., stamped April 30, 1998, I offer the following comments and recommendations: SITE GRADING On May 27, 1997, the City Council approved Interim Use Permit No. 97-1 for site grading within this development. The grading and storm water pond construction has been completed for Phase I and part of this phase. Grading for this phase will include Coulter Boulevard west of Century Boulevard and Lots 1 through 4, Block 4. The City's water tower site will also be included. Security will be required to guarantee site grading of Coulter and Century Boulevards and erosion control measures. DRAINAGE In conjunction with the City's Public Improvement Project No. 97-1D, a storm water drainage system will be constructed within Coulter Boulevard to convey most of the development's storm water runoff for this phase and future phases into the existing stormwater ponds for pretreatment prior to discharging into the wetlands. UTILITIES Under the City's Public Improvement Project No. 97-1D, the City will be installing . the sanitary sewer and water lines necessary to serve this phase and subsequent phases. The developer will be assessed their fair share of the improvements in accordance with the feasibility study. A 20-foot wide drainage and utility easement is being dedicated over Lots 1 and 2, Block 2 for extension of a watermain to the City's water tower site (Outlot A). A cross access easement should also be granted to the City over these lots for access in case development of these lots impede the access along the 20-foot wide drainage and utility easement. . City ofChanhassen. A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a chaJming downtown, thriving businesses, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and pldy. Bob Generous Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition May 5, 1998 Page 2 STREETS This phase will include street improvements along Century Boulevard up to the north lot line of Lot 4, Block 1 and a temporary cul-de-sac at the end of Coulter Boulevard. Eventually Coulter Boulevard will be extended out to Trunk Highway 41 with a right-in/right-out when MnDOT upgrades Trunk Highway 41. Additional street easement will be necessary for the temporary cul-de-sac to construct a turnaround with a 43-foot radius at the end of Coulter Boulevard. The street will be constructed under the City's contract for Project No. 97-lD. Based on traffic studies, this development and future phases will impact local and regional transportation systems from an operational and safety standpoint. Traffic signals will be necessary at the intersections of 82nd Street West and Trunk Highway 41 as well as Trunk Highway 5 and Century Boulevard. The signals at 82nd Street and Trunk Highway 41 are scheduled for installation in 1999. With Phase I the developer escrowed with the City a financial guarantee for their share of the local cost participation for construction of auxiliary turn lanes and traffic signals at 82nd Street and Trunk Highway 41. No additional security will be required with this phase. The final plat proposes to dedicate sufficient right-of-way for the roadway systems throughout. The future extension of Coulter Boulevard west of Century Boulevard is proposed with an 60-foot wide right-of-way, in accordance with City subdivision regulations. Sidewalksffrails will be constructed as a part of the street improvements. A 5- foot wide concrete sidewalk will be installed along the south side of Coulter Boulevard and an 8-foot wide bituminous trail along the east side of Century Boulevard. MISCELLANEOUS Since this development requires a public improvement project to construct the infrastructures and streets to serve the site, final plat approval should be conditioned upon the City awarding a contract for Improvement Project No. 97- ID. The developer could be allowed to commence with site grading conditioned upon entering into Addendum B to the Development Contract/PUD Agreement with the City for Arboretum Business Park and providing security to guarantee erosion control measures and site restoration. The administration fees total $143,069 which includes 1/3 trail fees, SWMP fees and recording fees (see attached breakdown of fees dated 5/5/98). Bob Generous Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition May 5, 1998 Page 3 RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The developer shall enter into Addendum B to the Development Contract/PUD Agreement for Arboretum Business Park and provide a financial security in the form of a letter of credit to guarantee site grading of Century and Coulter Boulevards, administration fees, erosion control measures, and site restoration. Upon execution of the addendum and receipt of the necessary fees and permits, i.e. Watershed, NPDES, the developer may proceed with site grading operations. 2. Final plat approval shall be conditioned upon the City awarding a bid for construction of Public Improvement Project No. 97-1-D. 3. The developer shall dedicate to the City a temporary turnaround easement over Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2 to construct a turnaround with a 43-foot radius at the end of Coulter Boulevard. The easement shall automatically expire with the connection of Coulter Boulevard to Trunk Highway 41. 4. A cross-access easement shall be dedicated to the City over Lots 1 and 2, Block 2 for access to the water tower site (Outlot A). 5. All driveway access points shall be constructed in accordance with the City's industrial driveway detail plate No. 5207. 6. All areas disturbed as a result of construction activities shall be immediately restored with seed and disc-mulched or wood fiber blanket or sod after completion of each activity in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook. Attachment: Breakdown of Administration Fees dated 5/5/98. c: Anita Benson, City Engineer \\dsl\vol2\eng\projects\arboretum\arboretwn 2nd\review of final plat memo.doc