1a2 Arboretum Business Park, 2nd Addition, Site Plan Review
CITY 0 F
CHANHASSEH
1. ~\\
'~";~" }
vC,.. ,...10.,:1
PC DATE: 4/15/98
~~""".:o:;.rr~:m,;.r'.l;",,,~-r
CC DATE: 5/11/98
CASE: Site Plan #98-4
STAFF REPORT
PROPOSAL:
Request for site plan review for a 50,400 square foot building as one of two office-
industrial-warehouse buildings or one building up to 113,600 sq. ft., Arboretum
Business Park 2nd Addition
-
z
~
J
J
1.
L
::(
LOCATION:
Northwest comer of Century Boulevard and Coulter Boulevard
APPLICANT:
Steiner Development
3601 Highway 101 South
Wayzata, MN 55391
(612) 473-5650
PRESENT ZONING:
PUD, Planned Unit Development
ACREAGE:
4.76 acres
or
9.16 acres
FLOOR AREA RATIONS:
0.24 FAR
0.28 FAR
ADJACENT ZONING
AND LAND USE:
N - PUD
S - PUD, Coulter Boulevard, Heartland America Building
E - PUD, Century Boulevard
W - PUD
~
-
~
WATER AND SEWER:
Available to the site.
~
-
PHYSICAL CHARACTER:
Site was partially graded as part of the First Addition.
-
)
2000 LAND USE PLAN:
Office/Industrial
LE~:',>...,.;:.; . . ,...,j
T T
~/l
'. ~ ~1~;~~Y1 ~, &h;~ if
.~ I~"'>? o/~ II I
'" \_"~~~ ,~r/_,1c.?fV
* LohsY/""' \ "--r P ~//
' y;< IT \ klR
~;~ 'f::::::f ~ 1- R\ ~ \\\ ~ 01
I ~ -~'-'" ~ ~L
",c~s~ ~r- _ ~F\\~~/
~'ICO~\~ \^V~l
o ~SSh~' f<oC'lj I n
"" ' ..,~lj.JilJt: r::J }:;:-., g ~ E ' r.r J. 1.1 I r
. '-', ~ '1,:i:p, a...- ~/
o "'S \ \ ! ./,.~ \ /'0, "'>,\,: .
t"j:, r '7'''' a.
~C; . 11vd Park u
::-:r 1J~ "r .,~ I r r T
.- 11 n rllll I f- \
'.:~ I):.~ JITI If ~ .f
. L ~ ~ .~ r-f
' ., .'o/b:' I rD, \
~
R5
iJti.
00114/j .
:r,"e
)
.-..----j.' ;
'0
\.
o
<:i
-- .. i
~~
_ ~SlGI
~.:
, :;>
li St.:
tJ.:----
I
.::en ,IT evarr-'
- J"I"E [",'Pi' ......8, ./1 1 -
'1 ~ ....;.UW. '0'..:'''/,/, i?J
<~>l. ~ I,:."C>'~C f3 . ["c,/:.,., '" '.
.,/ W j::):>"c~;.~, 1'~ ~ I' '<" 't
- , ., S:d I..:, ,. '
. '. .,' i',c,:. ~;~~?:)~ ',' .....
L 71" ~;c ~.r~' bqw~Ot
\i~'" ~
.... ,~
'/.,'\ i ~~
:<f.7'K'~~ ~ a' [),J ________ ~ "'" ~
t;!j~Lm, '~=- ' \~IE::: _ '" ~
tr T . _ ~...:: ~.
"'0 s~!.J~rrl.L.\T\ ne ': \ ~~
~ '~~r e\:B-i1 OWl' ~ 'l tiT IT
\U1.J~ J ~ V...x"
c= ~~ '<2'A1 ~
~,'~b:-~~'l~~
C~~JI~~~ ~~~~~~
Lyman 8 V'-rlT1 "0 ,..,~e" ~,;;.~f.:':'
.fV' '0 -Q.J' ~ ~~'\~ -: \_ ~._~;
...,a , !
-I;" )
/. ;
\ ' ar.
, ~ \ '.,.,~::~,,-
",/ \
to: "-JILobf
- t::.--
..
.,~~"
""'~
.'
~
~
-~
~_8t
--
f
I I
o I
o .
~ 8700 -!
I
o
o
Q)
N
Planning Commission Meeting - April 15, 1998
in the staff report. Alternate 1 would require a minimum of27 shade trees, 24 ornamental or
conifer trees, and 36 shrubs. Alternate 2 would require a minimum of 63 shade trees, 48
ornamental or conifer trees, and 72 shrubs. The buffer yard on the west of the site shall
incorporate native grasses and wildflower mix as ground cover.
13. Additional evergreens shall be added to the northern and southern landscape peninsulas at the
comers of the building and at the southwest comer of the site to provide more screening of
the loading areas from the street.
14. Each landscape peninsula must have one shade tree. Landscape peninsulas less than 10 feet
in width must have aeration tubing installed.
15. The applicant shall install foundation plantings around the perimeter of the building as
required by city ordinance.
16. On the utility plan, off the northwest comer of the Phase II part of the buildings, a hydrant is
shown directly in the center of the driveway off Century Boulevard. Please provide a
hydrant off of the northwest and the northeast comer of the phase 1 building. Please provide
hydrant off the west side of the phase 2 building. Move the hydrant on the south side of the
phase 2 building to the southwest comer of the building.
17. Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division policies will need to be reviewed and
followed during the course of the project."
18. All roof mounted equipment shall be screened walls of compatible appearing material or
camouflaged to blend into the building or background.
19. The applicant and staff present to the City Council a detailed presentation of all pedestrian
and trail connections with this site.
All voted in favor and the motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARING:
HKS ASSOCIATES IS REQUESTING A REPLA T OF A PORTION OF OUTLOTS D &
E. VILLAGES ON THE PONDS INTO LOT 1. BLOCK 1. VILLAGES ON THE PONDS
3RD ADDITION AND SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR AN 7.443 SQ. FT. HOULIHAN'S
RESTAURANT ON PROPERTY ZONED PUD AND LOCATED SOUTH OF HWY 5
AND EAST OF MARKET BOULEVARD.
Sharmin AI-Jaff presented the staff report on this item.
Peterson: Any questions for staff.
Brooks: .. .bar-be-que shack?
14
Planning Commission Meeting - April 15, 1998
Joyce moved, Conrad seconded that the Planning Commission recommend approval of Site
Plan #98-4 for a 50,400 square foot building, site plan prepared by Smuckler Architects
dated March 10, 1998, subject to the following conditions:
1. The development must comply with the Development Design Standards for Arboretum
Business Park.
2. The building entrances shall project out from the body of the building to provide significant
visual relief in a manner and at intervals in keeping with the size, mass, and scale of the wall
and its views from public streets.
3. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary
security to guarantee erosion control, site restoration and landscaping.
4. The site plans shall be redesigned to reflect the proposed street and utility improvements
proposed with Phase I of the City's public improvement project for Arboretum Business Park.
5. All driveway access points shall be constructed in accordance with the City's industrial
driveway detail plate No. 5207. Drive aisle widths to the truck parking lot shall be increased
to 30 feet wide and the turning radiuses onto Coulter Boulevard expanded to accommodate
truck turning movements.
6. Erosion control fence shall be installed and maintained around the downstream side of the
site until all disturbed areas have been revegetated and removal is authorized by the City.
Storm sewer inlets shall be protected with silt fence, hay bales and/or rock filter dikes until
the parking lot has been paved with a bituminous surface.
7. The City's boulevards must be restored with sod. The landscaping plan shall incorporate
landscape material suitable for a 2: 1 slope.
8. Site plan approval is contingent upon the City authorizing and awarding a project for Phase II
public improvements for Arboretum Business Park and final plat approval for Arboretum
Business Park 2nd Addition.
9. Detailed storm drainage calculations including drainage area maps for a IO-year, 24-hour
storm event shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to issuance
of a building permit.
10. Commencement of construction for this development is contingent on the recording of a final
plat for Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition.
11. The applicant shall provide areas for bicycle parking and storage on site.
12. The applicant shall work with staff to revise the landscape plan to meet minimum
requirements for parking lot landscape, boulevard trees and buffer yard plantings as specified
13
Planning Commission Meeting - April 15, 1998
Blackowiak: It hasn't been seconded.
Peterson: Yes it was.
Generous: I believe you have to act on the amendment first to the motion and then...
Burton: .. . offer a friendly amendment as part of the last...
Conrad: We have to vote on the motion.
Peterson: There's been a motion and a second.
Burton moved, Brooks seconded that the Planning Commission recommends approval of
Site Plan #98-4 for a 50,400 sq. ft. building or a 113,600 sq. ft. building, site plan prepared
by Smuckler Architects dated March 10, 1998, and subject to the 18 conditions presented
in the staff report with one addition presented by Commissioner Burton. All the
commissioners voted in opposition and the motion failed unanimously.
Peterson: Is there another motion?
Joyce: I make a motion that the Planning Commission recommends approval of Site Plan #98-4
for a 50,400 square foot building, site plan prepared by Smuckler Architects dated March 10,
1998 subject to conditions 1 through, I believe we had 19. I'd have to do redo those conditions,
wouldn't I? 18 being, make sure that the root top enclosures were screened with compatible
materials. And number 19, that the applicant insure that the pedestrian access and access to trail
system for this property.
Peterson: Is there a second to this motion?
Conrad: Second.
Peterson: Discussion.
Brooks: Well I just wanted to say that, I don't think the Planning Commission is against your
large building. I think what we don't like is the architectural style of the building. I think we're
becoming really weary of how Chanhassen is starting to look with all these warehouses. So...
because I didn't get the feeling any of us were against the large building, or against what you're
trying to do. It's just the look of it, and you've got to admit when you drive around Chanhassen,
the warehouses are not a pretty site. And there's not a lot you can do but there's something you
can do.
Peterson: Any further discussion?
12
Planning Commission Meeting - April 15, 1998
Brooks: I'll reluctantly second.
Peterson: Any discussion?
Conrad: Yeah, we don't have to give approval for the second large building.
Joyce: That's what 1...
Conrad: I also think the motion should talk about staff making sure, present to the City Council
that the connection, the trail connections, pedestrian connections, I think that's got to be real
clear. It's a big building. Big site. Several employees so I think there should be a better
demonstration of how it's connected. The large building is real repetitive and I think we all share
the same concern. I think the proposal is okay but it's certainly probably not the great thing that
we envisioned. I think the smaller building works. I think the message to the developer is, from
here on out maybe we're going to have different expectations of what goes there but I'd just
make those comments. The motion's there.
Peterson: ...
Conrad: I would make a friendly amendment to the motion that the staff presents, the staff and
applicant presents to the City Council all the trail and pedestrian connections in the formal staff
report.
Burton: I think I'll, if! can, amend my motion to delete the reference to the 113,600 referenced
building.
Fred Richter: Can I speak to the issue of...? This PUD, this property was guided by the City for
an industrial office park. The nature of office, industrial is large buildings. Our PUD grants us a
certain floor area ratio.. .on land, the marketplace for us to do a successful, we need large
buildings. I just want to say that that's, we went forward with the PUD. It's our understanding
that we can have large buildings on this property. Large buildings by their nature are repetitive.
.. .go on record that we feel that it's our right... The City made a decision, they wanted this type
of taxes on the property. They made a very concerted effort to define where the retail is. They
made a very concerted effort to put parameters on property that abuts Highway 5 and 41 with
design constraints. We're talking about an interior lot that is guided for these uses and these
sizes. And that is you know. . . we made our investment in the property and so on.
Brooks: Can I respond to that?
Peterson: No. Actually, thank you for your comments. We've got a motion and a second on the
table and we need to vote on it.. . after do that, we can come back...
Aanenson: Was the motion going to be amended or?
Peterson: Well, can he amend a motion after it's been seconded?
11
Planning Commission Meeting - April 15, 1998
Generous: Correct.
Joyce: But we will someday hopefully have, we're looking at some conference centers and some
things like that.
Generous: And convenience commercial. . .
Joyce: I don't have much else to add. I'm not.. .by it. The building that's there right now look
like any other office park, warehouse. It looks like a warehouse really is what it is and I had
higher expectations for this PUD. I really thought we were going to try to do something more
creative and so far it has not been. You know if we're just doing an office park like over here in
the Chanhassen Business Center, that's one thing but I didn't get that understanding when we
went through all the process. I agree with Allison. You've got the same parking out in front. I
don't see any, it doesn't really look that pedestrian friendly. It looks like another office park. If
that's what we're doing, then we've got a big office park out there. I mean I'm not going to, I'll
vote for it but I'm not thrilled with it. .. . development more in the future and get some more
interesting things other than warehouses. I mean it's just a warehouse.
Peterson: Well I too am a little frustrated. I look at the 113,000 square foot building and I see
ten entrances being virtually equal distance apart. Identical in nature. I just see a lot of the same
and that disquiets me to say the least, and I don't see creativity. I too, like Kevin, had higher
expectations and I'm not at all comfortable with approving a large 113,000 square foot building
only because it's just overwhelming and in a spot that I think can offer a lot more. And I guess
under some duress I would approve two buildings only because it does separate and give it at
least a little bit softer, a little bit more inviting than the one large building. Architecturally it is
like everything else and again I think that now is the time for us to say let's do something
creative and different and now I'm placing economics aside by saying that and whether that's an
issue, but yet it doesn't prevent me from sharing those thoughts so to that end I'm not
comfortable with the large building. I'm comfortable with the changes that have been made that
could have been integrated into the two separate buildings. With that, may I have a motion and a
second please.
Burton: I'll move that the Planning Commission recommend approval of Site Plan 98-4 for a
50,400 square foot building.
Peterson: Subject to the following conditions. Go ahead and make your motion and then I'll
respond accordingly.
Burton: Or a 113,600 sq. ft. building, site plans prepared by Smuckler Architects dated March
10, 1998, subject to the following conditions and it's 1 through 17 and I would add 18. That all
roof mounted equipment shall be screened walls of compatible appearing material or
camouflaged to blend into the building or background.
Peterson: We have a motion. Do we have a second.
10
Planning Commission Meeting - April 15, 1998
going to be covered up by a second building, I guess we can kind of live with that in the
meantime. Finally, I had trouble because it talked about the building being similar in terms of
the Heartland and I certainly hope that gets painted quickly because it's, I really wouldn't want it
to be similar to Heartland right now. But really that's about it. Generally I think it's good. I
would like to make sure that staff works with the applicant to carefully review pedestrian and
bike access to the project because that's a very important part of this entire PUD so I would
really want to make sure that that gets addressed as well.
Peterson: Thank you. Matt?
Burton: I pretty much agree with all the comments, particularly Alison's comments regarding
landscaping because ifit does take a while for the Phase II of the smaller building to be built, it
would be nice to have some landscaping, especially on the west and north sides. The other item
that I threw out there is the staff report brought up the concern about screening and the applicant
did address that but I did notice that it's not part of the conditions and I would.. .consider a
condition that the roof mounted equipment be screened and that shouldn't be a problem since
they're planning on that. And I guess that's it.
Peterson: Thank you. LuAnn.
Sidney: Well I made a few comments and tipped my hand about my concerns and I guess kind of
starting off, at first when I saw the original renderings I was concerned that we were getting too
much of the same thing and I think the applicant has done a good job in improving the
architectural features of the building. I am concerned however because I still have a feeling that
the textures, lack of texture on both buildings is too much the same and I'd like to see other
possibilities and I think maybe the entrance forms is an area where a different texture could be
used to add some interest to the buildings. I'm concerned with the polish or the look to the
building. I would like to reiterate, if! can say it, staff comments about not supporting additional
buildings that incorporate the same materials or design as the first two site plan proposals and I
feel very strongly about that. I think since these buildings are more in the center of the
development, I feel a little more comfortable but I think we need some more variety next time
around. That's all I have for now.
Peterson: Thank you. Kevin.
Joyce: Mr. Chairman, I apologize for being late. I have one quick question for staff. Have we
tossed about the idea of any commercial going in there? ..all allocated towards office and
industrial warehouse.
Generous: Well within the entire Arboretum Business Park there are 4 lots, or 4 parcels that are
designated for.
Joyce: ... the PUD, the entire PUD is going to have some commercial. I didn't understand it and
I got a building square footage breakdown. It's just right now zero commercial.
9
Planning Commission Meeting - April 15, 1998
Fred Richter: .. .what happens then is what people said and.. .so that's why we need to be in a
position.. . try to have this coincide with the final plat. We've had preliminary plat approved so...
Then that allows us to you know pull the permit. . .
Peterson: Other questions from fellow commissioners? Thank you. Seeing none, may I have a
motion to open this to a public hearing and a second please.
Sidney moved, Burton seconded to open the public hearing. The public hearing was
opened.
Peterson: This is a public hearing. Anyone wishing to address the commission, please come
forward and state your name and address please? Seeing none...
Brooks moved, Blackowiak seconded to close the public hearing. The public hearing was
closed.
Peterson: Ladd. Can we have your comments on this one please.
Conrad: I'm okay. I agree with the staff report.
Peterson: Alyson.
Brooks: I guess I don't have anything against it. I don't find the building itself particularly
architecturally intriguing in any way... with the parking in front like any warehouse. It just
detracts from the building and looks unpleasant but it is what it is. I'm not overwhelmed by it.
I'm a little under whelmed. I don't see any reason to stop it either.
Peterson: Recommendations to improve it or.
Brooks: Not really off the top of my head. I think it would have been better if things were
recessed...in front is flushed and I'm not sure, I don't know. It's a warehouse. You know I wish
somehow we could move the parking or hide it. I don't think it ever helps when the parking's
out in front. I think visually your eyes.. . and again it is what it is and I'm not sure there's much
we can do.
Peterson: Allison.
Blackowiak: Yeah, I really don't have a lot to say. A couple comments I guess. If indeed they
are looking for the smaller of the two buildings, the 50,000 square foot building, Phase I, I would
ask if there could be something done, some type of landscaping or something on the second part.
Could we do that now in conjunction with Phase I as opposed to have it just wait? Specifically
along the back of the lot. I think that would be kind of west side. On the north side against the
street. I think those would be some things that maybe could be added to improve the general
appearance to the area yet not be disturbed by any future construction. Secondly, the north side, I
kind of agree with the comments that the north side is visually not terribly appealing but if it is
8
Planning Commission Meeting - April 15, 1998
Sidney: Yes. A question about the rationale behind two buildings versus one smaller building
with the potential for expansion. I guess I'm wondering why you would select two separate
buildings but not really when I see the rendering here, now it angle off all the comers that are
visible to Century Boulevard. This looks like you took an eraser and kind of went down the
middle of the building.
Steve Krapek: The rationale of why the entries are where they are is because historically there's
a certain tenant size that you can.. . and you're trying to be as accommodating as you can to all the
tenants that you can have and so you essentially.. . structurally end up with an entry at every third
bay. There really isn't any need from.. .because the entry that would go to this final tenant along
that side is taken care of back. .. The difference in the two buildings is that again, the
marketplace is very competitive and people have different needs and if a large anchor tenant
came in, they may have different needs in terms of their storage type... Some people have high
rack storage. Some have low rack storage. The predominant market at this moment, am I correct
is that they don't need to have high rack storage. So they're trying to accommodating enough for
a long term tenant that might need that. You look at that as a potential to give something that's
not readily available in the marketplace but.. . overbuild high rack storage when it's not
something that you actually need, it's really not either serving the marketplace and if the cost that
the developer has to incur, that it really isn't going to be recovered. And so I think until it's
settled out which they tenant they go and what the marketplace is saying that they demand, that's
why the flexibility is there. But they're trying to be as accommodating as they can to all parties.
Fred Richter: I think the building's flexibility is defined by the.. . and we design and own our
buildings so we also look for. .. You see a lot of the tenant bays moving to Hopkins, Eden
Prairie and moving out... At this point in time we're trying to do this site plan...
Sidney: One more question about material. I'm wondering ifit's possible to have a different
type of texture in the entrance forms. Is that a possibility?
Steve Krapek: It is a possibility. The materiaL.. tends to be the most attractive one I believe of
all of them. The smooth finish is the one you pay the most premium for and it gives you the
greatest facility to manipulate color. You know as you go into a form that has some sort of
texture or surfacing about it, it tends to distort the paint. It tends to wear off quicker. It tends to
put more of a premium on that finish and. . .
Blackowiak: ...PUD standards and this is office industrial warehouse, am I correct? Do you
have anybody you're looking at or is it still kind of up in the air?
Fred Richter: ....
Blackowiak: So with what you're looking at right now, would that be looking at the smaller
building which you said was more manufacturing oriented?
7
Planning Commission Meeting - April 15, 1998
would be the street frontage. And it's this elevation. The rendering elevation and what's a bit
confusing in that drawing is that this element that you're seeing here in this rendering, it's at a 45
degree angle so it appears skewed and narrower on that building elevation than it is in actual fact.
It's the same width as all the other ones. The north elevation that's shown on that same sheet
that's down in the middle of, down here. That would be one of the internal facades when the
second building was built and so it really isn't of much point, there's really no entry to...
Peterson: And your primary people using that entrance are going to be truck traffic. . . back side
of the building, correct?
Steve Krapek: I don't believe that we'll bring trucks that way. I think the intent is to bring them
down this road in the back. And also along the other one and not have trucks circulate through
the center of that parking. That would be more for office and warehouse.
Fred Richter: But hopefully all the truck traffic is...
Peterson: But visually it would be limited to the users of the building primarily?
Steve Krapek: And I think Fred made a good point. That until the...is filled, you are correct in
assuming that. . .
Peterson: Other questions?
Joyce: I have no other questions. Regarding the pedestrian access. I don't see any sidewalks or
link ups to the trails and I noticed that was on.
Fred Richter: ...I think right now we just haven't detailed it but Bob, you can correct my
memory, are we on the east side...?
Generous: It was always proposed that on the east side of Century Boulevard, the trail system
would be and then connecting to Coulter Boulevard going to the east. Which is on the north side
of Coulter.
Fred Richter: And it'd be the same thing going north.
Aanenson: Correct. It loops around.
Generous: Yeah, and then there's an internal trail and then a street trail that would connect to the
north side of Highway 5.
Fred Richter: I think a site plan detail, you'll give us some guidance, we will have some
connection for the pedestrians to cross...
Peterson: Other questions?
6
Planning Commission Meeting - April 15, 1998
that we were talking about is rather than have one long facade that was 300 feet long, we bumped
those entry forms out 5 feet.
Peterson: Other questions.
Joyce: What's different with the west elevation as far as the treatment versus, is there any
difference?
Steve Krapek: The west elevation is different in the character of the skin of the building. The
front of the building.. .are smooth, similar to the building that was. .. The back part, the west
elevation and this band that's above this.. . reveal which would be here, is still the smooth finish.
The back.. .are you familiar with what that looked like.
Joyce: I saw that in the report.
Steve Krapek: Essentially they take a. . .
Fred Richter: The west elevation is all loading docks...
Steve Krapek: And it's finish tends to create a lot more shadow lines than a smooth face would.
I won't say that...
Fred Richter: As Bob pointed out earlier, the good thing that the site plan is, our west elevations
always face into a hill. So basically doing the west elevation is almost... for the most part the
west elevations face into...
Peterson: Move to the north elevation. Assuming that that is, at least for a period of time, the
majority of your traffic is going to be coming down that road from the north. Your first
impression is a pretty cold and blank wall of the small rendering that I'm looking at at least of the
building.
Steve Krapek: Well it's exactly this shot and it's a fairly deceiving elevation because if you look
at this plan.
Fred Richter: There's some confusion on that because in both cases, you're looking at this north
elevation but that would be, that would be the elevation for a period of time but our intent is to
do the next building, another 50,000 square foot building and that would become an internal
elevation but it could be a year. . . where that would be the north elevation. The only difference is
that we aren't...
Peterson: Even on the larger building, the north elevation, the only difference seems to be six
windows that are.. .on the rendering.
Steve Krapek: No. The north elevation that's shown at the top of your sheet that would say
EDO 5. In that instance the north elevation is down here at the long end of this property so that
5
Planning Commission Meeting - April 15, 1998
Fred Richter: .. . system is a very smooth finish with a.. . reveals and all those reveals then are
complimented or articulated by the changing color. So you actually get the... through the change
of color. Not necessarily the depth. The only way you would get articulation through depth
would be shade and shadow and even if it were 2 inches, it would be very nominal so through the
basically taking this smooth concrete which then becomes like a palette for painting and you can
really then develop... very cost effective way compared to other industrial buildings where the
options aren't... combining them with changes in paint colors.
Steve Krapek: The other thing that I would add to that is that you know typically other buildings
that are of this scale that aren't pre-cast, and they aren't masonry, tend to be that EFIS.. . system.
The styrofoam that has the stucco.. .on top of it. Traditionally even in just for instance the
Dayton's that's over at Southdale. Those reveals are no deeper than an inch, two inches. The
difference hopefully in this one is that we have fairly wide reveals compared to some of those
longer ones and you know we've done different things to try to break that mass down and color
becomes a fairly important part of that process. The revealing and the diamonds and that tend to
give a certain rhythm and flow to that building so that it just isn't this big blank sort of thing but
obviously there's only so much you can do with a lot of blank wall and the color is really a fairly
important part of that.
Peterson: Is this building material essentially the same as the previous? It's just a different color.
Fred Richter: It's the same structural concept, basic concept...
Peterson: Other questions from fellow commissioners?
Conrad: So the rendering is really not accurate?
Steve Krapek: No, the rendering is fairly accurate. This one?
Peterson: The one that we have.
.' 'Conrad: The one that you just passed around.
Steve Krapek: Accurate in what way?
Conrad: The depth.
Steve Krapek: Yes it is. The entry forms that are shown here previously as it was submitted, it
was all one flat facade. There was no stepping out of these entry forms at all so.
Conrad: This looks like 2 feet and you were just saying 2 inches so.
Steve Krapek: No. I'm sorry. What we're talking about the is the depth of these reveals, like
this red stripe, these diamonds. This panel sits back from the face of that panel. The other issue
4
Planning Commission Meeting - April 15, 1998
paneling aren't that... so we felt we needed to bring in some additional color to help bring those
along. That's the color that's shown here and I believe...it doesn't show very well on that screen
but all the colors, the two that are here are actual paint samples from the paint.. . sent to us. They
give you fairly good indication of the direction that we're going. This lower band that goes below
the windows is again still precast. .. As I mentioned before, the back of this building will have
the...pre-cast concrete finish. The front of this is smooth... The diamonds that are shown here
are. .. The parapet walls above the roof line is high enough so the mechanical equipment is
screened. We also think that. . .and the treatment that we did along the top of that building in
raising that panel up slightly higher tends to break that long facade a little different than you've
seen traditionally in a lot of the other buildings around here. Some of them have made that
gesture but they've done it with metal roof forms that are back from the building and they
haven't actually changed this perimeter or the skin at all. And we've done that. This panel now
is an inset panel that's just being painted a different color. It isn't recessed that was indicated
probably by the shadowing when we did this rendering a couple days ago. But the entry glass is
recessed some to give you some reliefback... And again this band that's shown here is the one
that's shown in this perspective.. . about an inch or two and they'll be painted in those stripes.
Peterson: You speak of that reveal being an inch or two in depth. Walk through if you would,
are they all. . . or are some of them greater in depth than others?
Steve Krapek: Well I think if we look at this, and it's rather small. I'll pass this around so you
can get a better feel for what this color is actually like. I think obviously there's an issue of
exiting and life safety so each one of these bays will have an entry and I believe that this.. .it's
sitting back and it probably will only happen if the primary entity. .. wouldn't you think?
Peterson: That was my second question so you can answer them both. The depth of the entrance
and the reveals, architectural reveals being the diamonds and the character around the entrance
itself. Are they 2 inches also like your band or are they a foot?
Steve Krapek: No, the walls themselves are only a foot thick.. .insulated panels. About 3 inches
to 4 and then the insulation is integral in that.. .so those reveals will be on the order of an inch
and a half to 2 inches.. .the engineers and the problem of how much revealing we have and.. .but
I would think that the diamonds could be deeper than the horizontal reveals and typically they're
between an inch and an inch and a half.
Peterson: Discuss the possibility if you would, going deeper... My sense is architecturally you'd
get more character out of more depth but what are the alternatives, is that possible based upon the
current building or not? I could be wrong. I'm just giving my opinion there.
Steve Krapek: Well you could maybe go 2 inches. In asked them, you know without that
additional cost, you are limited by that first thickness of concrete because as I said, it's a very
ingenious system that they came up with buildings insulated with styrofoam in-between those
pours and they have. . . the thickness of that wall so in all of that that I've ever seen is 2 inches.
3
Planning Commission Meeting - April 15, 1998
Peterson: Now you're drawing the line and you're saying no more like this after this one?
Generous: That was my point, yes.
Peterson: Okay. To that end, does the applicant or their designee wish to address the
commission and if so, please come forward and state your name and address please.
Fred Richter: I'm Fred Richter with Steiner Development and I have with me tonight Steve
Krapek ofSmuckler Architects. He'll speak to the color renderings and the tile massing of the
project. And also Peter Kordonowy our property manager for the first Steiner buildings in the
Arboretum Business Park. Let me just give you a little insight into why we have two options in
front of you. We're trying to develop the Arboretum Business Park for industrial and following
the PUD, as you recall, there are certain sites that will front on Highway 5 and 41 and those will
have, in some cases, different uses that's outlined in that PUD. We are owners and developers of
multi-tenant office-warehouse projects. Our first building is fully leased up and we'll be
finishing the final construction at the painting and landscaping right away starting next week and
leaving through the month of May. Looking at trying to move the project along, the City,
ourselves invested in Century Boulevard and we picked this site. It's already graded. It's ready
to go and Century Boulevard will be blacktopped to the site. Looking at the square footage and
the potential of this site as outlined in the PUD, it yields I think Bob said up to 117,000 square
feet of floor area ratio. Looking at the market place, it's changed. We're in a more mature
market now. There's getting to be quite a bit of vacancy, especially in the southwest. Shakopee
and even in the east side ofChanhassen. So we're proposing two, because we want to get an
anchor tenant before we start construction. So if we have a larger tenant, one of 50,000 square
feet, it would trigger the larger building. If we get a smaller tenant, something in the
neighborhood of a minimum of around 18-20,000 square feet, we would do the smaller building
and then phase the second building. The object obviously is to, from our standpoint, not to
overbuild the market and have a lot of vacancy. So that's why we're looking for the flexibility.
Currently we're marketing both buildings and we have interest in both but until we have a signed
tenant, we don't want to move forward so we appreciate your consideration on that flexibility.
Other than that, I think I'll turn it over to Steve and he can run through the final color selections
and I'll just preface one final statement. The staff comments we reviewed the issue of the
protruding mass versus the recessed mass is fine with us. We've made that adjustment. Steve
will show you the impact of pulling basically the area around the entrance out versus recessing.
Steve Krapek: As Fred said, I'm Steve Krapek with Smuckler Architects. On the overhead, if
you want to do it that way. You can see a perspective from the corner. The building that's
shown in this perspective is the higher of the two proposals that we've shown and the longer one.
As you can see in this area, this is the area that we discussed with Bob in terms of pulling all
those entry forms open. If you look on the plan, it's probably easier to.. . forward but you can see
that it runs between the entrance... I believe are three bays long. Giving sort of multiple
opportunities for... The color schemes that we used tended to be those that we discussed with
Bob. Also the colors that were sort of compatible with what we felt. .. On all the entry forms we
tend to darken up the entry so that. . . scale of the building down. The relief that are in the recast
2
CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
APRIL 15, 1998
Chairman Peterson called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Alison Blackowiak, Matt Burton, Craig Peterson, LuAnn Sidney,
Allyson Brooks, Ladd Conrad and Kevin Joyce
STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Planning Director; Bob Generous, Senior Planner;
Sharmin AI-Jaff, Planner II; and Dave Hempel, Asst. City Engineer
PUBLIC HEARING:
STEINER DEVELOPMENT IS REQUESTING SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR TWO
OFFICE INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS UP TO 113.600 SQ. FT. LOCATED
AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CENTURY BOUEL V ARD AND COULTER
BOULEVARD ON PROPERTY ZONED PUD. ARBORETUM BUSINESS PARK.
Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item.
Peterson: Questions of staff from fellow commissioners. One clerical in nature. If you look at
the.. .113,600 building that says it will be built on 9.16 acres and then you look at Lot 3 as being
8.98. Where's the difference coming from or is that just.
Generous: It's moving through the line in the project. It's slightly north of halfway.
Peterson: If there's no questions, I think the key thing I guess really seeing a better rendering of
what the proposal is and...some of those changes are. The other item you talked about in the
staff report, and I quote in the other paragraph it says, the staffwill not support additional
buildings that incorporate the same materials or design elements as the first two site plan
proposals. You also inferred that it's similar to the first building and.. . falling into a gray area
about similarity versus distinctly different. Do you see the first building on that site is
developing, that the difference with the current...in front of us tonight, is that substantially
different or are you talking abruptly different in it's dealing in architecture or is the difference
that you see... for additional buildings in that development.
Generous: I believe, what I'm looking for is when we have another building that might be
similar, office warehouse type that they incorporate additional materials so that we don't have
only tilt up cOl~crete paneling in there. Maybe block face. Some I'm aware we're looking at for
at least the highway frontages would probably be brick and steel and glass finishes.
Peterson: Is it safe to assume then you're somewhat accepting this one being somewhat similar
to the first one?
Generous: Yes. Right.
THE MINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM
3675 ARBORETUM DRIVE
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
MILLS PROPERTIES
512 LAUREL STREET, PO BOX 505
BRAINERD, MN 56401
COEUR TERRA LLP
3610 SOUTH HIGHWAY 101
WAYZATA. MN 55391
CHASKA GATEWAY PARTNERS
3610 SOUTH HIGHWAY 101
WAYZATA, MN 55391
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
PLANNING COMMISSION
Wednesday, April 15, 1998
at 7:00 p.m.
City Hall Council Chambers
690 City Center Drive
~
-&..
SUBJECT: Request for a Site Plan Review
for Two Office Industrial
Warehouse Buildings
>-
III
~
.r:.
Cl
I
COl
....
APPLICANT: Steiner Development
~nd st.
LOCATION: NW Corner of Century Blvd.
and Coulter Blvd.
D
NOTICE: You are invited to attend a public hearing about a proposal in your area. The
applicant, Steiner Development, is requesting site plan review for two office industrial
warehouse buildings up to 113,600 sq. ft. The property is located in the Arboretum Business Park.
What Happens at the Meeting: The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the
developer's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the
meeting, the Commission Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps:
1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project.
2. The Developer will present plans on the project.
3. Comments are received from the public.
4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses project. The commission will then
make a recommendation to the City Council.
Questions and Comments: If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City
Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to
someone about this project, please contact Bob at 937-1900 ext. 141. If you choose to
submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting.
Staff will provide copies to the Commission.
Notice of this public hearing has been published in the Chanhassen Villager ~Iqct
Bob Generous
April 8, 1998
Page 3
2. All driveway access points shall be constructed in accordance with the
City's industrial driveway detail plate No. 5207. Drive aisle widths to the
truck parking lot shall be increased to 30 feet wide and the turning radiuses
onto Coulter Boulevard expanded to accommodate truck turning
movements.
3. Erosion control fence shall be installed and maintained around the
downstream side of the site until all disturbed areas have been revegetated
and removal is authorized by the City. Storm sewer inlets shall be
protected with silt fence, hay bales and/or rock filter dikes until the parking
lot has been paved with a bituminous surface.
4. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and
provide the necessary financial security to guarantee erosion control
measures, site restoration and landscaping.
5. The City's boulevards must be restored with sod. The landscaping plan
shall incorporate landscape material suitable for a 2: 1 slope.
6. Site plan approval is contingent upon the City authorizing and awarding a
project for Phase II public improvements for Arboretum Business Park and
final plat approval for Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition..
7. Detailed storm drainage calculations including drainage area maps for a 10-
year, 24-hour storm event shall be submitted to the City Engineer for
review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit.
ktm
c: Anita Benson, City Engineer
g:\eng\dave\pc\l3 hI abp 2nd.doc
Bob Generous
April 8, 1998
Page 2
project engineer the appropriate locations for the sewer and water services and
adjust the site plan accordingly.
STREETS/PARKING LOTS
The City's Public Improvement Project No. 97-1 will be completing a portion of
Century Boulevard up to the east leg of Coulter Boulevard this spring. The
applicant has submitted a petition to the City to extend Century Boulevard and
Coulter Boulevard west of Century Boulevard. Without this improvement project
the site plan shall be considered premature since there will be inadequate utility
improvements and street systems to accommodate this development.
The drive aisle widths throughout the project appear to be in conformance with
City Code. Staff recommends that the truck access onto Coulter Boulevard be
increased from 26 feet wide to 30 feet wide to accommodate truck traffic. In
addition, the turning radius onto Coulter Boulevard needs to be increased to
accommodate turning movements. Industrial driveway aprons will be required at
all access points onto city streets. The City has a standard plate (5207) which
should be utilized.
EROSION CONTROL
The grading, drainage and erosion control plan needs to be modified to incorporate
erosion control fence and erosion control blanket on slopes in excess of 3: 1. All
storm sewer inlets shall be protected with silt fence, hay bales or rock filter dikes
until the parking lot has been paved with a bituminous surface.
MISCELLANEOUS
The City's boulevards must be restored with sod. The landscaping proposed along
the westerly slopes of the site should incorporate landscape materials which will
help secure the steep slopes. The site is currently platted as an outlot. The
applicant will need to final plat the site to Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition.
In addition, an addendum to the existing Development Contract/PUD Agreement
will be necessary. Final plat documents need to be submitted to the City a
minimum of three weeks prior to final plat consideration by the City Council.
CONDITIONS OF APPRO V AL
1. The site plans shall be redesigned to reflect the proposed street and utility
improvements proposed with Phase I of the City's public improvement
project for Arboretum Business Park.
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
690 City Center Drive, PO Box 147
Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317
Phone 612.937.1900
General Fax 612.937.5739
Engineering Fax 612.937.9152
Public Safety Fax 612.934.2524
iVeb www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Bob Generous, Senior Planner
,I
,Ai.'
Dave Hempel, Assistant City Engineer w"\:,
FROM:
DATE:
April 8, 1998
SUBJ:
Site Plan Review for Two Office Warehouse Buildings Located in
the Northeast Corner of Century Boulevard and Coulter Boulevard
Lot 3, Block 1, Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition
File No. 98-10 LUR
Upon review of the plans prepared by Schoell & Madson dated March 20, 1998, I
offer the following comments and recommendations:
GRADING
The site was previously rough graded in conjunction with Phase I Arboretum
Business Park. Therefore, only minor site grading will be necessary for the
building pad and parking lot construction. The grading plan overall is in general
conformance with the development plan for Arboretum Business Park.
Given the site's topography, berming will not be achieved along Century
Boulevard. The site is actually anywhere from one to ten feet above Century
Boulevard.
DRAINAGE
In conjunction with Phase I of the City's public improvement project for
Arboretum Business Park, storm sewer improvements have been installed along
Century Boulevard. Phase II of Arboretum Business Park will include street and
utility improvements to accommodate this site. The storm sewers proposed on the
site plan will need to be redesigned to coordinate with the City's public
improvement project. Detailed storm drainage calculations including drainage area
maps for a lO-year, 24-hour storm event shall be submitted to the City Engineer
for review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit.
UTILITIES
Municipal sanitary sewer and water has been extended in conjunction with the
City's Public Improvement Project No. 97-1 along a portion of Century Boulevard
adjacent to the site. However, no individual sanitary sewer or water service has
been extended at this time to service the lots. In conjunction with Phase II of the
City's public improvement project individual sewer and water services will be
extended to the lots. The applicant's engineer shall coordinate with the City's
The City of Chanhassen. A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and P,
7. All signs shall require a separate sign permit.
8. In addition to the two signs identified in g. 5. above, signage for the main entrance on
Highway 5 and Century Boulevard shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning
Commission and City Council.
h. Lighting
1. Lighting for the interior of the business center should be consistent throughout the
development. The street lights should be designed consistent with the existing lighting
along the existing Coulter Boulevard.
2. A decorative, shoe box fixture (high pressure sodium vapor lamps) with a square
ornamental pole shall be used throughout the development area for area lighting.
3 Lighting equipment similar to what is mounted in the public street right-of-ways shall be
used in the private areas.
4. All light fixtures shall be shielded. Light level for site lighting shall be no more than 1/2
candle at the property line. This does not apply to street lighting.
i. Alternative Access
1. Each site shall accommodate transit service within the individual development whenever
possible.
2. Pedestrian access shall be provided from each site to the public sidewalk and trail system.
3. The developer and site users shall promote and encourage Traffic Demand Management
Strategies.
4. Each site shall provide areas for bicycle parking and storage.
7
f. Site Landscaping and Screening
1. Landscaping along Highways 41 and 5 shall comply with Buffer yard standard C. Coulter
Boulevard, Century Boulevard, and West 82nd Street shall comply with Buffer yard standard
B. The master landscape plan for the Arboretum Business Park (formerly Gateway) PUD
shall be the design guide for all of the specific site landscape developments. Each lot must
present a landscape plan for approval with the site plan review process.
2. Storage of material outdoors is prohibited unless it has been approved under site plan
review. All approved outdoor storage must be screened with masonry fences and/or
landscaping.
3. Undulating or angular berms or elevation changes of3' in height shall be placed along
Coulter Boulevard, and Century Boulevard. The berms shall be sodded or seeded at the
conclusion of each project Phase grading and utility construction. The required buffer
landscaping may be installed incrementally, but it shall be required where it is deemed
necessary to screen any proposed development. All required boulevard landscaping shall be
sodded.
4. Loading areas shall be screened 100 percent year round from public right-of-ways. Wing
walls may be required where deemed appropriate.
g. Signage
1. All freestanding signs be limited to monument signs. The sign shall not exceed eighty (80)
square feet in sign display area nor be greater than eight (8) feet in height. The sign
treatment is an element of the architecture and thus should reflect the quality of the
development. The signs should be consistent in color, size, and material throughout the
development. The applicant should submit a sign package for staff review.
2. Each property shall be allowed one monument sign per street frontage.
3. The signage will have consistency throughout the development. A common theme will be
introduced at the development's entrance monument and will be used throughout.
4. Consistency in signage shall relate to color, size, materials, and heights.
5. The Arboretum Business Park PUD shall be permitted two Arboretum Business Park
identification signs. One sign per project entrance, at West 82nd and Century Boulevard
and at Highway 41 and the westerly roadway, shall be permitted. Said sign shall not
exceed 80 square feet in sign area nor be greater than eight feet in height.
6. Wall sign shall be permitted per city ordinance for industrial office park site.
6
1. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural
standards and site design. All mechanical equipment shall be screened with material
compatible to the building.
2. All materials shall be of high quality and durable. Masonry material shall be used. Color
shall be introduced through colored block or panels and not painted cinder block.
3. Brick may be used and must be approved to assure uniformity.
4. Block shall have a weathered face or be polished, fluted, or broken face.
5. Concrete may be poured in place, tilt-up or pre-cast, and shall be finished in stone, textured,
coated, or painted.
6. Metal siding will not be approved except as support material to one of the above materials
or curtain wall on office components or, as trim or as HV AC screen.
7. All accessory structures shall be designed to be compatible with the primary structure.
8. All roof mounted equipment shall be screened by walls of compatible appearing material or
camouflaged to blend into the building or background. Wood screen fences are prohibited.
All exterior process machinery, tanks, etc., are to be fully screened by compatible materials.
9. The use of large unadorned, pre-stressed concrete panels and concrete block shall be
prohibited. Acceptable materials will incorporate textured surfaces, exposed aggregate
and/or other patterning. All walls shall be given added architectural interest through
building design or appropriate landscaping. The buildings shall have varied and interesting
detailing. The use of large unadorned, concrete panels and concrete block, or a solid wall
unrelieved by architectural detailing, such as change in materials, change in color,
fenestrations, or other significant visual relief provided in a manner or at intervals in
keeping with the size, mass, and scale of the wall and its views from public ways shall be
prohibited. Acceptable materials will incorporate textured surfaces, exposed aggregate
and/or other patterning. All walls shall be given added architectural interest through
building design or appropriate landscaping.
10. Space for recycling shall be provided in the interior of all principal structures or within an
enclosure for each lot developed in the Business Center.
11 Each buildings shall contain one or more pitched roof elements depending on scale and
type of building, or other architectural treatments such as towers, arches, vaults, entryway
projections, canopies and detailing to add additional interest and articulation to structures.
12. There shall be no underdeveloped sides of buildings visible from public right-of-ways.
All elevations visible from the street shall receive nearly equal treatment and visual
qualities.
5
Lot 1, Block 1 1.80
Lot 2, Blockl 2.32
Lot 4, Block 4 Office/Hotel 4.06
LotI, Block 3 6.41
Restaurant/Office
11,746/23,520
15,180/30,320
26,536 / 53,060
(.lOFAR) 27937 /
83,770
(5/1000) 59
(411000) 61
(5/1000) 133
(1611000) 447
Commercial sites may develop as office-industrial uses. Square footage for individual lots
may be reallocated within the development, by type, provided the maximum square footage
is not exceeded.
Building Square Footage Breakdown
Office 31% 368,000/(432,000)
Light Industrial 31% 368,000/(432,000)
Warehouse 31% 368,000/(432,000)
Commercial 7% 81,000/(0)
Total 100% 1,186,000 / (1,295,000)
*includes the Wrase property. () represents conversion of commercial uses to office-
industrial uses
2. More than one (1) principal structure may be placed on one (1) platted lot.
3. Building height shall be limited to 3 stories or 40 feet.
4. Lot 5, Block 4, is intended to accommodate a major corporate headquarters or office,
research, high end manufacturing with limited warehousing type user. While the majority
of the development is based on 30 percent office space, Lot 5 must have a minimum of 40
percent office use and include multi-story building(s).
e. Building Materials and Design
4
. General Merchandise Store
c. Setbacks
The development is regulated by the Highway 5 and the PUD Standards. There are no minimum
requirements for setbacks on interior lot lines in the PUD zone. The following setbacks shall apply:
Street Frontage
Minimum Setback
Buildin arkin
70/50
50/20
Hwys. 5 & 41
Coulter & Century
Boulevards
82" & West Local 30/20 NA
*Lot 5, Block 4, must only meet the maximum setback on one Highway frontage.
The average hard surface coverage does not include Outlots A and B. The PUD standard for
hard surface coverage is 70% for office and industrial uses. Anyone site/lot can exceed the 70
percent requirement but in no case can the entire finished development exceed 70 percent.
d. Development Standards Tabulation Box
1. Building Area
Lot 3, Block 1 10.02 131,006 262
Lot 4, Block 1 5.45 71,218 142
Lot 5, Block 1 4.41 57,688 115
Lot 1, Block 4 4.38 57,199 114
Lot 2, Block 4 5.40 70,597 141
Lot 3, Block 4 8.98 117,371 235
Lot 1, Block 2 12.23 159,822 320
3
Conferences/Convention Center - establishments designed to accommodate people in assembly,
providing conference and meeting services to individuals, groups, and organizations. (Lot 5,
Block 4)
Indoor RecreationlHealth Club - establishments engaged in operating reducing and other health
clubs, spas, and similar facilities featuring exercise and other physical fitness conditioning. (Lot
1, Block 3; and Lot 4, Block 4)
HoteL1l1otel-establishments engaged in furnishing lodging, or lodging and meals, to the general
public. (Lot 1, Block 3; and Lot 4, Block 4)
Utility Services - Water towers and reservoir. (Lots 3, 4, and 5, Block 1; Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block
4; and the Wrase property)
Commercial uses (permitted on lots specified as commercial in development standards
tabulation box)
1. Restaurant, permitted on Lot 1, Block 3 or Lot 4, Block 4. (One stand alone restaurant.)
2. Convenience store with or without gas pumps, not to exceed 12,000 square feet, on Lot 1 or
2, Block 1, only. (One convenience store.)
3. Banks, with or without drive up windows (Lots 1 and 2, Block 1; Lot 1, Block 3; and Lot 4,
Block 4)
4. Day Care - establishments providing for the care and supervision of infants and children on a
daily basis. (Lots 1 and 2, Block 1; Lot 1, Block 3; and Lot 4, Block 4)
Ancillary Uses (in conjunction with and integral to a primary use)
1. Fast Food (no drive-through and only in conjunction with and integral to a convenience
store ).
2. Restaurant (only in conjunction with hoteVmotel or convention/conference center).
3. Showroom - showroom type display area for products stored or manufactured on-site provided
that no more than 20 percent of the floor space is used for such display and sales.
4. Telecommunication Towers and Antennas by conditional use permit only.
5. Car wash, in conjunction with convenience store.
6. Day Care
Prohibited uses
. Contractors Yard
. Lumber Yard
. Home ImprovementIBuilding Supply
. Garden Center
. Auto related including sales and repair
. Home furnishings and equipment stores
2
EXHIBIT C
ARBORETUM BUSINESS PARK
DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS
Development Standards
a. Intent
The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD light industrial/office park. The use of the PUD zone is
to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive
proposal. All utilities are required to be placed underground. Each lot proposed for development
shall proceed through site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. Photo-
composite images of proposed development adjacent to Highways 5 and 41 shall be submitted as
part of the review process. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality
of architectural standards and site design. Ancillary uses may be permitted as listed below if they
are ancillary to a principal use on the individual lot. Commercial/retail uses are prohibited
except those uses specifically noted below.
b. Permitted Uses
The permitted uses in this zone should be limited to light industrial, warehousing, and office as
defined below. The uses shall be limited to those as defined herein. Ifthere is a question as to
whether or not a use meets the definition, the City Council shall make that interpretation. Permitted
uses shall be allowed on the different Blocks and Lots for which they are specified below. The
Blocks and Lots specified below are those designated on the attached PUD plan. The Block and
Lot designations in final plats approved for phases of development may differ from those specified
below. However, the permitted uses shall continue to be those specified below for the Lots
identified in the PUD plan.
Light Industrial- The manufacturing, compounding, processing, assembling, packaging, or testing
of goods or equipment or research activities entirely within an enclosed structure, with no outside
storage. There shall be negligible impact upon the surrounding environment by noise, vibration,
smoke, dust or pollutants. (Lots 3, 4, and 5, Block 1; Lot 1, Block 2; Lots 1,2,3, and 5, Block 4;
and the Wrase property)
Warehousing - Means the commercial storage of merchandise and personal property. (Lots 3, 4,
and 5, Block 1.; and Lots 1,2,3, and 5, Block 4)
Office - Professional and business office. (Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, Block1; Lot 1, Block 2; Lot l,
Block 3; Lots1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, Block 4; and the Wrase property)
Health Services- establishments primarily engaged in furnishing medical, surgical and other
health services to persons. (Lots 1 and 2, Block 1; Lot 1, Block 3; and Lot 4, Block 4)
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
690 City Center Drive, PO Box 147
Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317
Phone 612.937.1900
General Fax 612.937.5739
Engineering Fax 612.937.9152
Public Safety Fax 612.934.2524
\Veb www.ci.chanhassen.//ln.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Bob Generous, Senior Planner
Steve A. Kirchman, Building Official 4- 0. . \! .
FROM:
DATE:
April 6, 1998
SUBJECT:
98-4 SPR (Arboretum Business Park, Steiner Development)
I was asked to review the variance proposal stamped "CITY OF CHANHASSEN, RECEIVED, MAR
13 , 1998, CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT." for the above referenced project.
1 have no comments or recommendations concerning this site plan review application at this time.
I would like to request that you relay to the developers and designers my desire to meet with them
as early as possible to discuss commercial building permit requirements.
g:\safetylsaklmemoslplanlNo-comnt
The City of Chanhassen. A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and 1
CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT
P.O. Box 97 . 7610 Laredo Drive. Chanhassen, MN 55317
Bus. Phone 934-9191 . Minnewashta Station No.2. Phone 474-7094
CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTIVIENT POLICY
L:.lbelin~ Fire Rated Walls
General
Numbers and/or letters shall be placed on all rated fire walls identifying their rating.
Said numbers and/or letters shall be not less than 5 inches high x 3 inches wide, with a
minimum Y. inch stroke and shall contrast with the background.
Requirements are for new and existing construction.
Occupancy Requirements
This f'olicy is in effect for allcccupancies except Group R-3.
Other Requirements
I.
Idenriiication shall be marked 10 feet from every' comer or change of direction and every
30 fee: thereafter. Identification shail be on both sides of interior walls.
...,
Idenr:~ication can be hidden from plain view, i.e., above ceiling tiles or in attic spaces.
All C't:-:er locations must be af'proved by one of the following: Fire yfarshal, Fire
Inspe.:tor, Building Official. or Building Inspector.
EX3.m~le: I hr (I hour fire wa[1)
q::~/--
Chanhassen Fire Department
Fire Prevention
Policy #+ 1997
Date: 01/08/97
Revised:
Page 1 of 1
:\;:-pr0\ ec: - ?~.~Iic Safety Direc:..'r
9. All systems must be designed to NFP A-13, 1991 edition and Chapter 6 Standards. All attic
systems are to be spaced Jt a maximum 130 square foot coverage. 3/4" plastic piping \vill not
be allowed at any time in attic SPo.cc.
10. All equipment installed in a fire protection system shall be UL listed or factory mutual
approved for fire protection service.
11. ~ Firt:.. protection systems that are hydraulically calculated shall have a 5 psi safety factor at
maximum system flow.
12. Acceptable water supplies for fire sprinkler systems are listed in NFP A-13, 1991 ed., Chapter
7. Swimming pools and ponds are not acceptable primary water supplies.
13. Pressure and gravity tanks shall be sized per the requirements contained in NFP A-13 and 22.
Duration of the water supply shall match the hazard classification of the occupancy.
14. Include spec sheets for fire sprin.l:.ler heads - dI'): pipe/pre-action valving.
15. The definition of inspection is contained in ivfN Rule 7512.0100 Subpart 10, and staLes that
inspection means:
1. Conducting a final acceptance test.
2. Trip test of dI')' pipe, deluge or preaction valves.
3. A test that an authority having jurisdiction requires tC?'be cOrlducted under the
supervision of a contractor. Only licensed fire p'rotection contractors are
pem1irted to conduct these tests.
-1-. All other inspections including the inspectors test, main drain and other va!\'es
are permirted under ~vN Rule 7512.0400 Subpart-2G, as maintenance activities
and do not require a license as a fire protection contractor.
16. Per Section 904.3.2. and the 199-1- Unifom1 Building Code, an approved audible sprinkler flo\v
alarm to alert the occupants shall be provided in the interior of the building in a normally
occupied location. (Location must be approved by the Chanhassen Fire Marshal).
17. In existing systems, the following shall apply:
'1
I. If any changes in the hydmulically most demanding area, or an addition of 20 or
more heads, hydraldic calculations will need to be pro\'ided.
If an addition or change of 20 or more heads to a system, a test \\il! need to bo:::
completo:::d.
Q~
y:^ 11
/~:sra
~ro\'ed-Public S::lfety Direcw[
Ch;lnhassen Fire Dep.'_rtn~ent
Fire Prevention Oi\'i5:011
Policy #-1-0-1995
Date: 01112/95
Re\'ised: 03/1297
Page: 2 of 2
C I TV 0 F
CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147. CHANHASSEN MINNESOTA 55317
. I
(612) 937-1900 · FAX (612) 937-5739
CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICY
FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS
1. Permits are required for all sprinkler work.
2. A minimum of four sets of plans are required. Send, or drop off plans and specifications and
calculations to:
Mark Littfin, Fire Marshal
City of Chanhassen
690 Coulter Dri\'e
Chanhassen. ~G\" 55317
3. Yard post indicators are required and must have tamper protection.
4. All control values must be pro\'ided with tamper protection,
5. All syst~ms tests must be witn~ssed by the Chanhassen Fire ~1arshal. Appointments can be
made by calling th~ Fire Marshal at 937-1900, ext. 132, between 8:00 A:v1 and 4:00 P\L
r.10nday through Friday. Please try to arrange tests at least 24 hours in advance. All revisions
of25 he:1ds or more \\ill require a test.
6. j\1ain drains & inspector test connections must be piped to the outside atmosphere.
7. \\'ater 111~1V not be introduced into sprinkler piping from the City main until the Fire J\1arsr:,d
witnesses a flush test per l\FP.-\ 13-8-2.1.
8. The City of Ch:mhassen h~1S aJopted Appendix E (see 1305.6905 appendix chapter 38 of the
~1BC).
ChJ.n.l-.::ssen Fire Dep~lI1i11ent
Fir~ Prevention Oi \'is;on
Policy #40-1995
Date: 01112/95
Re\'ised: 03/12/97
Page 1 of2
C I TV 0 F
CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE · P.O. BOX 147. CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900. FAX (612) 937-5739
CH.-\NHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICY
MAXIMUM ALLOWED SIZE OF DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ON A
COMBL'JA lION DOMESTIC/FIRE SPRL'lKLER SVPPL Y LINE
1. Domestic \vater line shall not be greater than 1/4 pipe size of the
combination service water supply line.
2. 1 1/2" domestic off 6" line.
3. 2" domestic off 8" line.
4. 2 1/2 domestic off 10" line.
Option 1:
Domestic sizes may be increased if it can be calculated hy~au1ically that the
demand by all domestic fixtures will not drop the fire spririkler water below its
minimum gallonage required.
Option 2:
Combimtion domestic and five line service shall have an electric solenoid valve
installed on the domestic side of the service. This vah'e shall be normally
powered open and dose on loss of electric power or signal from the system
water flow indicator.
Must be approved by the Chanhassen Fire Marshal and Chanhassen
Mechanical Inspector.
,~,n 7ci-
Chanhassen Fire Department
Water Line Sizing
Policy #36-199'+
Date: 06/10/94
Revised:
Page 1 of 1
Approved - Public Safery Director
4) Water main flushing shall be witnessed by the utility superintendem.
a) Watermain flushing may be scheduled by contacting the utility
superintendent at 474-2086. A 48 hour notice is required.
b) The utility superintendent shall obtain a water sample for a bacteria test
after the main flush and deliver to a testing company. The contractor shall
be responsible for testing costs. Allow two weeks for testing results to be
returned to the City.
c) Upon receiving approval of the water sample test, the utility
superintendent shall submit a copy to each plumbing inspector and turn
water on to the tested and approved sections of the piping.
5) An additional supervised flush and flow test will be required and witnessed by
the Fire ~farshal for services supplying fire suppression systems. The flush and
now test shall be performed in accordance with 1991 edition of NFPA 13, Sec. 8-
2.1. Contact the Chanhassen Fire ylarshal at 937-1900. ext. 132.
6) \V:lterrnain installations shall comply with:
a) Minnesota Plumbing Code. Chapter 4715
b) Chanhassen Engineering Department. Waterrnain Specifications
c) National Fire Protection Association. Chapter 2.+
..
7) Only authorized city employees are perrnirred to operate city water control valves.
For water rum on or off contact the utilir:; superintendem by phone -P4-2086. A
2.1 hour notice is required.
v./~
\ C6--?;rr /0
'---. f/ ,
Approved - Ptlbiic Safer}' Direct~'r
Ins~ections Division
\Vater Service Installation
Po li-::y #34-1993
Date: 04/15'93
Rev:sed: 04d -:- 96
P:lge 2 of 2
C I TV 0 F
CHANHASSEN
690 COULTErl DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147. CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900. FAX (612) 937-5739
\VA TER SERVICE INSTALL\. TION POLICY
FOR CO\fMERCIAL k'ID INDUSTRIAL BT..:1LDINGS
1) The Inspections Division shall be responsible for issuance of permirs. No pennit
shall be issued until :lpproval of plans have been obtained from the following:
a) Engineering Department
b) Fire 'farshal
c) Minnesota Department of Health
d) Plumbing Inspecwr
2) Plumbing inspecrors wii! do all installation inspections and wimess the hydrostatic
and conducti\'iry tests.
Inspection and Test Requiremems
a) All pipe shall be inspected before being covered. Phone 937-1900.
eX:. 31. to schedule inspections. A 24 hour norice is required.
b) Condl.:ctivity resz is required. The pipe shall be subjected to a minimum
350 Jmp tesr for 1 period of nor less than 5 minutes.
c) Hydrostatic test required. All pipe shall be subjected ro a hydrostatic
pressure of 150 psi for 2 hours. Allowable pressure drop shall nor exceed
1 PSI.
d) Pipe shall not be run under buildings - NFPA. 24.8-3.1.
3) tOron apr,oval of the hydro test. the plumbing inspector shall submir a copy of
the inspec:ion report to me utility superimendemo The inspection report shall note
whether t::e system is r~:ldy for main flush and drawing of warer sample for the
bug test.
Inspections Division
Water Service InstJIlation
Policy #34-l993
Dat~: 04/15'93
Revised: -+/17/96
P::.ge 1 of 2
CITY 0 F
CHANHASSEN
"
690 COULTER DRIVE · P.O. BOX 147 · CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900 · FAX (612) 937-5739
CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICY
General
PREMISES IDENTIFICATION
Numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing
buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible
from the street or road fronting the property. Said numbers shall
contrast with their background. Size and location of numbers shall
be approved by one of the following Public Safety Director,
Building Official, Building Inspector, Fire Marshal.
Requirements are for new construction and existing buildings where
no address numbers are posted.
Other Requirements - Genef'aJ
1. Nt.:mbers shall be a contrasting color froir{the ba~~ground.
2. Nt.:mbers shall not be In script
3. It a str..Jcture Is not visible from the str~et, addltJonaC'numbers are requIred at th~ driveway entrance. Size
and location must be approved. .:'1/ .
4. Nt.:mbers on mall box at driveway entrance may be a mInimum of 4". However, requIrement #3 must stili
be met.
s. Acmlnlstratlve authority may require additional numbers If deemed necessary.
R eskje{,t1aJ R equ I remems (2 ()( less dwelT1nq unit)
1. Minimum height shall be 5 1/4".
2. Building pemilts will not be flnaledunless numbers are posted and approved by the Building Department
Coml'ne('Cial Requirements
.......
,"
1. MI.,!mum height shall be 12".
2. SL-:p Malls
a. Multi tenant building \~ifl have minImum height requIrements of G".
b. Address numbers shall ~e on the maIn. entrance and on all back doors.
::-:. ~.-:'f
~.. ........ :
3. If address numbers are I.:c.ated on a dldct"ry entry sIgn, additional numbers will be requIred on the
bt.::ldlngs main entrance.
~
'~~~
~,y-~-
Chanhassen Fire Department
Fire Prevention
Policy #29-1992
Date: 06/15/92
Revised:
Sa~ty Director Page 1 of 1
t.) PRIN7:D 0\ iiECYCLED PAPER
Approved - Public
C I TV 0 F
CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147. CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900 . FAX (612) 937-5739
CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT
POLICY REGARDING PRE-PLAN
Prior to issuing the C.O., a pre-plan, site plan shall be submitted
to the Fire Department for approval. The following items shall be
shown on the plan.
1) Size 11" x 17" (maximum)
2) Building footprint and building dimensions
3) Fire lanes and width of fire lanes
4) Water mains and their sizes, indicate looped or dead end
5) Fire hydrant locations
6) P.I.V. - Fire Department connection
7) Gas meter (shut-off), NSP (shut off)
8) Lock box location
9) Fire walls, if applicable
10) Roof vents, if applicable
11) Interior walls
12) Exterior doors
13). Location of fire alarm panel
14) Sprinkler riser location
15) Exterior L.P. storage, if applicable
16) Ea3. Mat. storage, if applicable
17) Underground storage tanks locations, if applicable
18) ~ype of construction walls/roof
19) Standpipes
PLEASE NOTE: plans with topographical information, contour lines,
easement lines, property lines, setbacks, right-of-way lines,
headings, and other related lines or markings, are not acceptable,
and will be rejected.
. .' //,,, / //
'y/.... ;.;../:\~/~r _________
'\ ::..' ,~' , r '" ----=
v..".
..~p~,rc'\le,i - Puo~ lC Sa f e:y~ Di~ec tor....
Chanhassen Fire Department
Fire Prevention
Policy #07-1991
Da t e : (: 1 / 15 / 91
Revised: 02/18/94
Page 1 of 1
C I TV 0 F
CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147. CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900. FAX (612) 937-5739
CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICY
REOUIREMENTS FOR FIRE LANE SIGNAGE
NO
PARKING
FIRE
LANE
/ '\
7'0"
:
"- /
1. Signs to be a minimum of 12" x 18".
2. Red on white is preferred.
3. 3M or equal engineer's grade
reflective sheeting on aluminum
is preferred.
4. Wording shall be:
NO Pp~tU<ING
FIRE LANE
5. Signs shall be posted at each end
of the fire lane and at least at
75 foot intervals along the
.fire lane.
6. All signs shall be double sided
facing the direction of travel.
7. Post shall be set back a
minimum of 12" but not mere than
36" from the cu::-b.
(NOT TO
SCALE)
- 8. A fire lane shall be required in
GRADE front of fire dept. connections
extending 5 feet on each side and
along all areas designated by the
Fire Chief.
ANY DEVIATION FROM THE ABOVE PROCEDURES SH.'\LL BE SUB:UTTED IN
\~ITING, WITH A SITE PLAN, FOR APPROVAL BY THE FIRE CHIEF. IT IS
THE INTENTION OF THE FIRE DEPARTHENT TO ENSlJRE CONTINUITY
THROUGHOUT THE CITY BY PROVIDING THESE PROCEDLKES FOR ~L~~~ING OF
FIRE LANES.
~
,,\ (%.y,
Approved
/
7:;v<-
- Public
Safety Director
Chanhassen Fire Depa::-tment
Fire p::-evention
Policy =06-1991
Date: :/15/91
Revise=-:
Page 1 of 1
,.
~ J PRINTED 0>" RECYCLED PAPE;::;
9. High-piled combustible storage shall comply with the requirements of Article #81
of the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code. High-piled combustible storage is
combustible materials on closely packed piles more than 15' in height or
combustible materials on pallets or in racks more than 12' in height For certain
special-hazard commodities such as rubber tires, plastics, some flammable liquids,
idle pallets, etc. the critical pile height may be as low as 6 feet.
_ 10. _. Fire lane signage shall be provided as required by the Fire Marshal. (See policy
#06-1991).
11. Smoke detectors installed in lieu of 1 hour rated corridors under UBC section
33050, Exception #5 shall comply with Chanhassen Fire Department requirements
for installation and system type. (See policy #05-1991).
12. Maximum allowed size of domestic water service on a combination domestic!f1re
sprinkler supply line policy must be followed. (See policy #36-1994).
Approved - Public Safety Director
Chanhassen Fire Department
Fire Prevention
Policy #04-1991
Date: 11/22191
Revised: 12/23/94
Page 2 of 2
.~<7.I1~
-
C I TV 0 F
CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE · P,O, BOX 147. CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900. FAX (612) 937-5739
CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICY
CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTES TO BE INCLUDED ON ALL SITE PLANS
1. Fire Marshal must witness the flushing of underground sprinkler service line, per
NFP A 13-8-2.1.
2. A final inspection by the Fire Marshal before a Certificate of Occupancy is issued.
3. Fire Department access roads shall be provided on site during all phases of
construction. The construction of these temporary roads will conform with the
Chanhassen Fire Department requirements for temporary access roads at
construction sites. Details are available.
4. Onsite fire hvdrants shall be provided and in operating conditio}1 during all phases
or construction.
5. The use of liauefied petroleum 2as shall be in conformance with NFP A Standard
5S and the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code. A list of these requirements is
a\3.ilable. (See policy #33-1993)
6. All fire detection and fire suppression svstems shall be monitored by an approved
CL central station with a UL 71 Certificate issued on these systems before final
occupancy is issued.
7. .-\n 11" x 14" As Built shall be provided to the Fire Department. The As Built
shall be reproducible and acceptable to the Fire Marshal. (See policy #07-1991).
8. .-\11 approvecllock box shall be provided on the building for fire department use.
. The lock box should be located by the Fire Department connection or as located
'by the Fire lvlarshal.
Chanhassen Fire Department
Fire Prevention
Policy #04-1991
Date: 11/22/91
Revised: 12/23/9.+
Page 1 of 2
C I TV 0 F
CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147 . CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900 . FAX (612) 937-5739
CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICY
EXTERIOR LIGHT AND HORN OVER FIRE DEPARTMENT SPRINKLER CONNECTION
1) Exterior Light and Horn for indicating Fire Department
Sprinkler Connection shall be:
a. Simplex model number
Horn - 31T-115-R
Light - wn3T-115-FR
or
b. Wheelock 7004-T
c. Notifier 5542862
or
equivalent per Fire Department approval.
~ff
Approved - public Safety Director
Chanhassen Fire Department
Fire Prevention
Policy: #02-1990
Date: 09/04/90
Revised:
Page 1 of 1
,tr
~J PRINTED ON RECYCl:D PAPER
7. The alarm systems shall be audible above the ambient noise level in all areas of the
building. Alarm horns in each unit and all public areas, i.e. party room, pool, laundry
rooms. Horns shall be directly connected to the building alarm systems and supervised.
8. The system shall be zoned per Chanhassen Fire Department requirements.
9. A U.L. 7 I Certificate is required on the system. The U.L. 71 Certificate shall be current
and required forthe life of the alarm system and the life of the building.
10. A fully-function annunciator must be provided if the control panel is remotely located.
I I. Health care, day care. and assembly occupancy notification must be by chimes, unless
otherwise approved by the Fire Marshal.
12. All systems using standard horns or speakers must be set for temporal time.
13. The Chanhassen Fire Marshal must be contacted for final inspection of the completed
job. The inspection will include:
a. Test for proper operation of each device.
b. Random testing for system trouble.
c. Random testing for ground fault trouble.
d. Correct operation on battery or standby power.
eY2~
.
Chanhassen Fire Department
Fire Prevention
Policy =01-[990
Date: 0'+/19/90
Revised: 05/09/96
Page 20f2
A.ppro\~d - Public Safer: Dire~to,
C I TV 0 F
CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147 . CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900. FAX (612) 937-5739
CHr\7'iHASSE"N FIRE DEPARTMENT POLlCY
FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS
1.
Fire alarm systems shall meet the requirements ofNFPA T2 1993 Edition.
..,
Shop drawings shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval. Shop drawings
shall included the following. Approval and acceptance must comply with NFPA 72
1993 Edition 1-7.1.
a. Connection diagrams.
b. Specification data sheets.
c. Schedules. for each device. including: location. function. zoning.
d. Complete diagrams indicating: devices. components. intercon!l.ecting wiring,
indicate !J.beling and descriptions on equipment.
e. Floor plans indicating device and component locations. conduit. raceway and
cable routes.
f. Power connections. including source and branch circuit d::'..ta.
g. Plan layout and details of: fire alarm control panel. fire ::.iarm
subpanels transponders. annunciator.
J. Wiring may be either a Class A or Class B Wiring System. (Exception: When a fire
alann system is used to actuate an extinguishing system that protects a special hazard
with high value? Class A circuitry will be required.)
4. All c,'mponents 0f the system must be CL. listed for their applic:!tion, com~ible and
installed per ~PA i2E. 0iatiunal Electric Code and manufacturer's requirements.
5. Alarm veritication is required for all systems using smoke detectors.
6. \Vhe:1 Central Station nutific:.lcion is required or otherwise proviced. it must be through::l
C.L. :isted communic::lwr. or ~FP.-\ Lsted Control Panel. .-\11 Cer1tral Stations must be
L.L. :isted.
Chanhassen Fire Deparrment
Fire Pre\ention
Pol icy =1) 1- 1990
Date: 0.: 19/90
Revised: 05/09/96
Page 1 or":2.
Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #34-1993
Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #36-1994
Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #40-1995
Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #44-1997
If you have any comments or questions, please call me at 937-1990 ext. 262.
G: \safety\gh \plrev98-4
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
690 GO' Center Drive, PO Box 147
Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317
Phone 612.937.1900
General Fax 612.937.5739
Engineering Fax 612.937.9152
Public Safety Fax 612.934.2524
web www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Robert Generous, Senior Planner
FROM:
Greg Hayes, Fire Inspector
DATE:
March 31,1998
SUBJ:
Request for site plan review for two office/industrial
warehouse buildings up to 113,600 square feet located
at the northeast comer of Century Boulevard and Coulter
Boulevard on property zoned PUD Standard Development,
Arboretum Business Park.
Planning Case 98-4 Site Plan.
I have reviewed the site plan for the above project. In order to comply with the
Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division, I have the following fire
code or city ordinance/policy requirements. The site plan is based on the
available information submitted at this time. If additional plans or changes are
submitted the appropriate code or policy items will be addressed.
I. On the utility plan off the northwest comer of the Phase II part of the
buildings a hydrant is shown directly in the center of the driveway off
Century Boulevard.
2. Please provide a hydrant off of the North West and the North East comer of
the phase 1 building.
3. Please provide hydrant off the West side of the phase 2 building.
4. Move the hydrant on the South side of the phase 2 building to the South
West comer of the building.
5. Enclosed are the Chimhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division
policies which will need to be reviewed and followed during the course of
the project. These policies include:
Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #01-1990
Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #02-1990
Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #04-1991
Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #06-1991
Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #07-1991
Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #29-1992
T!Je City of CIWlhassen. A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, ant<
~
a:
~ ...
S
fA
~ fA ~
.. ~ W
..
.. ..a ..
m ~ = ~ z~~ ~
:) ffi ... ..a ~ ~ CI~ ~
-' ..
u ~ = ~ d:
m~:c a: <I) ~ <~~ '"
~ a'<<t ;
~~z~ 0 ~mr:n ~ ~
~u._ (') ~ . I: '~ ~
~d:J: IOcgCII to: Q:t::c '"
...
cg(')~ - ~ :I ~::::>z I ,;1 'H
cOcO~ 10 ~ =
.. ~t-~ ~I:'
CO~_ - a a .. . !h'~
~ :I
::l .~ ib Wu f;'{ ~ 1
II II Cl <I) in ':!
II II ~ ." ." ;.:J a:: j
~ f!!~3: ~ b':lgt 0 ~
, ,
&ite~
0 iil ~ <I) m
9~~ t- III I -* a:
<(
ILl
0
ii:
u.
0
.J
<
a:
,t-
0
- =-
b Q
~
....
.--'
-' ILl
a: (,)IO:!! 0
ILl · · 0: ii:
t- -(f)... u.
Z Cl)CI)cn 0
10 ILl t-t-:)
t- o 000
9 .... _d~:
"
Cll
"-
..
"
rl
0
Z ~
<(
...J l1. ;!
I- lIi~
a:::: 1; i
~i
<( oS: ..
W f vf
I : I
z a:::: ~ 1
0 w
~ >-..
~ z c _
~ g
!oJ W C
<
!oJ l-
v en
z
~
Z
!oJ
z
o
1=
~
j!:
It:
o
z_
z
o
~
Iii
~
C)
l:1
......
Jj~
"'C'.". l:1
,,,,.,,, Q)
;~if.i d
..,1\ H
~p.
Q) 0
l:1'Q)
..... :>
Q) Q)
ti~
~~~I ~ ~
IH~
u:r. lIa
::JU~
2"" ~46~
(J)<( J
l
'!
t' "
.s
IJ I C:S
i v i-
I I II ! .. ~~~
Id i III I ~-H
.~ g! ~.:I.
I ~ ~ il~
\
1-00
zer
W'!:
1:
(L ~.
% ~h
0 " wu
i= % >G'
... 9 ~ w<{
> " 01:
~ lD 9 G'
w
:t oL '5 W
r- <ri lD Z
" 0 oL ill
0 ~ <ri I-
'"
~ 0 <Jl
0
0 "" G'
w S1 0
'" LL
0 0 >L
II I>- W
0 '" G'
'" 0 <{
l>- I>- 0-
'" II 0
~ '" <Jl
I I>- <Jl
'" '" w-
% 0 5j~
0 "-
i= '"
... % iil~
> 0
~ i=
... S II
W >
~ 1-.
w w-
G' ..
o~
Jll<{
G'U
<{<Jl
% % %
0 0 0
i= i= i=
... ... ...
> > >
~ % ~ ~
w 0 w w
i=
:t ... r- r-
r- > '" '"
'" ~ w ...
0 3 W
% W
i :t
r-
'"
0
% i.
, i
, ,
%
0
i=
...
>
~
w
r-
'"
w
3
I ;
I i.
, , ,
J:~fZ'~"f'^.t1'J!::;L=_~
_ _.___ _~:X;UL"--<.C:';';~~::
I I B~
II~ ~ ;1
I
I~
~
~
t
I . n
~ I II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
f
f
f
f
f
I
/
t~.
a~1
!JI&
/
I
\
,
~ en I <<) ~-O
fDgl h'~ := ~ 0 ~~
s;i~1 II" 0 Q '-J.!~
~~i ui: 0 ~ ~
o
D_
B.
jg &
III
L]
sil. II Z I
fin r ~I
d .! <<; 0
= I . I
1~8fl It I
III ~II ~~ d. ':
It;!' -.. <.
~ "h1Ih- ~.
g i"il'l i I
'III i b II: i. .1,1
~ :S!!!!~:l! 11111111111
\
\
I
f
f
f
f
f
f
I
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
I
I
f
f
f
f
f
/
I
f
f
f
f
f
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
: (
I
I
I
\
t
1
.
1
!
~
;!
i
I I ~~
II~ ~ ;1
I
d
5
I
II
.Im
.! .!
: I . I
i~I" It.
I" III~:.. ~:
I!', ...
~ '1111115-. -
Q :Lli~11
I p. p! II ~ ..' II
; :!!!!!i~i! II;hll;UI
o
I
~.
..
t
iI
II
'1
I'
e
I
I if
II
Il!]
B I
I ~
o
\
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(~
t!.
J~~
B
o
<0 ~'o
8; '~8
Q 9:-
~ ~
~~~! ;I:l
~5~ II ii
;;;;~g U Ir
--------------------------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/
,~
I' fj '::'1 c./:'l ' I I I I
E:: --1 1-~-:.'-'-t.t..JJJ I I
L. -l --., I ....__.J. J.l. I I
1..:: '~;J / ~-~ ~~_':~ I
: t:'l,i :::/1 I- i I
Ifj'lij! ;! I,
L.:: '~.J / Q.. / / /'
, I: ]'1 ; J 1 !
# If f}/ i ~ / !:
r ,f::: ~.J / IJJ / / /
,..:: ::::/ !r / /
"--':J ::;: / S / /
r''-I II:. I I
--) I I I I,
\,:'''k\~----- .... / / /'
y...... CJ I 7"''''''''r-~-''''--.... , /
\""('-;,....... I J I I I '~'77~ ----, _ I I
(. ) I l.~_ } (~~~J ,
'.../.../J.llLLL./ I r-_... - "'/-1
'.J,.J -__,
-- -- -"
FROM CITY OF CHRHHRSSEH
03.16.1998 16:00
P. 3
b: f3,4~ M4iI Pl~~ - /A/MI ~ ~ td( tl; /Jf:if?,4.5"
WETLANDS p ~S~NT : YES >( NO ~ ~?/J7Te;D
PAESENTio I~d puc;' - 4'~/oed ~de - //14tft5/r/d
REQUESTeb dNiNCl l/~hC8 /P'J/&4~~
PRESENT ~IU~E OeSIGNAtlON
REQUESTeb ~~~ Use OeSIGNATION
~EASON F~ f:1~ FlEOueST :
ThIs appllca~~; u~t I?e comp~t$d In full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all Information
and plana r ' ul e ~y applicable City Otdlnance provisions. Before filing this application. you should confer wlth the Planning
Department 0 rtn'ne the speclflc ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application.
notice of BPpll tl, n~e'lcI8ncles shall ~ mailed to the applicant wtthln ten business days of application.
ThIS 18 to certIfY. t~~at: I am making appll~tlon for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with
III City requl~ e tl with regard to this request. This application should be processed In my name and I am the party whom
the C~y Ih04ld t at regarding any m.tter pettalnlng to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either
copy of Own.r' :..~ !Ieafe Cer'tlftcate of ",ltle. Abstract of Title or purchase agreement). or I am the authorized person to make
this application np ihe fee owner has also sIgned thIs applicatIon.
1 wlll keep tn HfOrmed of the de~dllnes for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further
understand "a d~ItIOnal fees, may ~ charged for consulting fees. feasibility studies. etc. with an estimate prior to any
authorization to . ed wIth the study. The documents and Information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of
my kno~', r!
o i' I
The dri he"b~~88 the applicant t~at development review cannot be completed within 60 days due to public hearing
requlrementt a ency revlew. Th"refore. the city 18 notIfying the applicant that the city requIres an automatic eo day
eX1enslon 10.r elppi'nent revieW. [)evelopmen.t revIew shall be completed within 120 days unless addItional review
extenalons are ': tf)vtd by the .p'pllca~t. ~ '
I' //" 0~
' . /: ' .:-;:...
/y' / - : .5 /~ ~b
?~
3;/7(1;
zt. 'Date
Fee Paid 7/ i~go , ---- Receipt No. ;2 '1',.;J
,
--
SIgna1ure of F
AppIlca1lon A.
The appllcant ~o*ld contact .taff fOf a copy of the staff report which will be available on Friday prior to the meeting.
If not contact , a, copy of the report will be mailed to the applicant'. add,....
FROM CITY OF CHRHHRSSEH
I I
L
'I i
I :
03.16.1998 15159
P. 2
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
880 COUL TEFl DRIVE
CHANHASSEN. MN 85317
(812) 137-"00
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION
ADDRESS:
nit Development.
ADDRESS: /36/tl 5. uP. ~ / tJ /
tl/q ~u::t4 J1tV ~~-3q /
TELEPHONE: q J3 565b
_ Temporary Sales PermIt
_ Vacation of ROW/Easements
_ Varlance
_ Wetland Alteration PermIt
_ Zoning Appeal
_ Zoning Ordinance Amendment
_ NotlflcaUon Sign
..L Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney COlt""
~50CU~SPRNAONARNYAP~~8
and Bound., $400 MInor SUB)
TOTAL FEE S 'I)D ~,)Z/~ d'1J
~ I ;;6J. I/f:?
, i'
A 'II ,0 411 property owner. within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must be Included with the
._pl, tl~n..
. i I
Bull I~g ~.terl81 samples must be submitted with site plan reviews.
-Tw;iY~l~ fu~1 Ilz. ~!copl.. of the plln. must be submitted. Including In 8Va" X 11" reduced copyof
IrIn I~r~ncy for "~~h8Dt.
, .
.. Ea ~w will be required for other Ippll~tlon. through the development contract
NOTE . Whe~ multiple applications are processed. the approprIate fee shall be charged for each application.
I
!
.'
Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition
April 15, 1998
Page 11
13. Additional evergreens shall be added to the northern and southern landscape peninsulas at the
comers of the building and at the southwest comer of the site to provide more screening of
the loading areas from the street.
14. Each landscape peninsula must have one shade tree. Landscape peninsulas less than 10 feet
in width must have aeration tubing installed.
15. The applicant shall install foundation plantings around the perimeter of the building as
required by city ordinance.
16. On the utility plan, off the northwest comer of the Phase II part of the buildings, a hydrant is
shown directly in the center of the driveway off Century Boulevard. Please provide a
hydrant off of the northwest and the northeast comer of the phase 1 building. Please provide
hydrant off the west side of the phase 2 building. Move the hydrant on the south side of the
phase 2 building to the southwest comer of the building.
17. Chanhassen Fire DepartmentlFire Prevention Division policies will need to be reviewed and
followed during the course of the project."
A TT ACHMENTS
1. Development Review Application
2. Reduced Site Plan and Landscaping Plan 50,400 sq. ft. Building
3. Reduced Site Plan and Landscaping Plan 113,600 sq. ft. Building
4. Reduced Building Elevations 50,400 and 113,600 sq. ft. Buildings
5. Reduced Building Elevation Steiner Heartland
6. Arboretum Business Park PUD Plan
7. Memo from Greg Hayes to Robert Generous dated 3/31/98
8. Memo from Steve Kirchman to Bob Generous dated 4/6/98
9. Memo from Dave Hempel to Bob Generous dated 4/8/98
10. Plans dated March 10, 1998
11. Planning Commission Minutes of 4/15/98
g:\plan\bg\arboretum business park bldg 2.doc
Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition
April 15, 1998
Page 10
2. The building entrances shall project out from the body of the building to provide significant
visual relief in a manner and at intervals in keeping with the size, mass, and scale of the wall
and its views from public streets.
3. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary
security to guarantee erosion control, site restoration and landscaping.
4. The site plans shall be redesigned to reflect the proposed street and utility improvements
proposed with Phase I of the City's public improvement project for Arboretum Business Park.
5. All driveway access points shall be constructed in accordance with the City's industrial
driveway detail plate No. 5207. Drive aisle widths to the truck parking lot shall be increased
to 30 feet wide and the turning radiuses onto Coulter Boulevard expanded to accommodate
truck turning movements.
6. Erosion control fence shall be installed and maintained around the downstream side of the
site until all disturbed areas have been revegetated and removal is authorized by the City.
Storm sewer inlets shall be protected with silt fence, hay bales and/or rock filter dikes until
the parking lot has been paved with a bituminous surface.
7. The City's boulevards must be restored with sod. The landscaping plan shall incorporate
landscape material suitable for a 2: 1 slope.
8. Site plan approval is contingent upon the City authorizing and awarding a project for Phase II
public improvements for Arboretum Business Park and final plat approval for Arboretum
Business Park 2nd Addition.
9. Detailed storm drainage calculations including drainage area maps for a IO-year, 24-hour
storm event shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to issuance
of a building permit.
10. Commencement of construction for this development is contingent on the recording of a final
plat for Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition.
11. The applicant shall provide areas for bicycle parking and storage on site.
12. The applicant shall work with staff to revise the landscape plan to meet minimum
requirements for parking lot landscape, boulevard trees and buffer yard plantings as specified
in the staff report. Alternate 1 would require a minimum of27 shade trees, 24 ornamental or
conifer trees, and 36 shrubs. Alternate 2 would require a minimum of 63 shade trees, 48
ornamental or conifer trees, and 72 shrubs. The buffer yard on the west of the site shall
incorporate native grasses and wildflower mix as ground cover.
Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition
April 15, 1998
Page 9
18. All roof mounted equipment shall be screened with walls of compatible appearing
material or camouflaged to blend in the building or background.
19. The applicant and staff shall present to City Council a detailed presentation of all
pedestrian and trail connections with the site.
The Planning Commission explained that they were not against the developer having a larger
building on the site. Rather, they did not like the architectural style ofthe building. They stated,
"we're becoming really weary of how Chanhassen is starting to look with all these warehouses."
If the developer wants a larger building, they should try additional architectural treatments, rather
than continuing the same long expanse of wall, broken intermittently by entrance features, but no
other significant relief. The Planning Commission had an expectation that development within
the PUD would be of a higher quality and incorporate additional architectural features than in
standard industrial warehouse areas. They felt that the larger building did not meet that
expectation.
Staff believes that condition 18 is already incorporated in the design standards for Arboretum
Business Park by standard e. Building Materials and Design which contains this same language
as well as a prohibition against the use of wood screen fences. In addition, rather than adding
condition 19 to the conditions of approval (which would duplicate Design Standard i. 2.), staff
will present the City Council with our recommendation for trail connections. Trails shall be
located on the east side of Century Boulevard and on the south side of the Coulter Boulevard
extension west of Century Boulevard. Staff is recommending that the applicant provide a
pedestrian connection from the southeast comer of the building to the intersection of Century
Boulevard and Coulter Boulevard west of Century Boulevard. Pedestrians could then cross to
the south side of Coulter Boulevard and use the cross walk to cross Century Boulevard. Within
. ~.he site, a pedestrian area will be provided between the building and the parking lot.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the following motion:
"The City Council approves Site Plan #98-4 for a 50,400 sq. ft. building or a 113,600 sq. ft.
building, site plan prepared by Smucker Architects dated March 10, 1998, subject to the
following conditions:
1. The development must comply with the Development Design Standards for Arboretum
Business Park.
Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition
April 15, 1998
Page 8
(5) Creation of functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with
special attention to the following:
a. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and
provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general
community;
b. The amount and location of open space and landscaping;
c. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of
the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and
neighboring structures and uses; and
d. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives
and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public
streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior
circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement
and amount of parking.
(6) Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision
for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light
and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations
which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses.
Finding: Subject to the revisions contained in the staff report, the proposed site plan is
consistent with all plans and specifications and development design standards for the
Arboretum Business Park Planned Unit Development.
PLANNING COMMISSION UPDATE
As part of their presentation to the Planning Commission, the developer incorporated staff s
recommendation to project the entrance features (five feet) out from the face of the building.
This was exactly what staff envisioned. The change created a varied facade breaking up the flat
surface of the building and at the same time differentiating this building from the Heartland
building to the south.
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 15, 1998 to review the proposed site
planes). A motion to approve the 50,400 square foot building or the 113,600 square foot building
failed unanimously. A second motion was made recommending approval of the 50,400 square
foot building only. The second motion passed unanimously subject to the conditions of the staff
report and the addition of conditions:
Final Plat - Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition
May 11, 1998
Page 9
creeks. Individual storm sewer calculations between each catch basin segment will also
be required to determine if sufficient catch basins are being utilized. In addition, water
quality ponding design calculations shall be based on Walker's Pondnet model.
*This condition has been met.
18. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies,
i.e. Carver County, Watershed District, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, Health
Department, Minnesota Pollution control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources, Army Corps of Engineers and Minnesota Department of Transportation and
comply with their conditions of approval.
*This condition still applies.
19. Fire hydrants shall be incorporated per the Fire Marshal's recommendations.
*This condition still applies.
a) 20. The appropriate drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated on the final plat
for all utilities and ponding areas lying outside the right-of-way. The easement width
shall be a minimum of 20 feet wide. Consideration should also be given for access
for maintenance of the ponding areas.
*This condition still applies.
21. No berming or landscaping will be allowed within the right-of-way except landscaping
along the frontage road in accordance with the Trunk Highway 5 Corridor Study.
*This condition still applies.
22. The lowest floor or opening elevation of all buildings shall be a minimum of2 feet above
the 100-year high water level.
*This condition still applies.
23. Stormwater ponds must have side slopes of 10: 1 for the first ten feet at the normal water
level and no more than 3:1 thereafter or 4:1 throughout for safety purposes.
*This condition is not applicable to this phase.
Final Plat - Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition
May 11, 1998
Page 10
24. The applicant shall report to the City Engineer the location of any drain tiles found during
construction and shall relocate or abandon the drain tile as directed by the City Engineer.
*This condition still applies.
25. Final grades adjacent to Trunk Highways 41 and 5 will be subject to review and approval
of MnDOT for compatibility with the future widening of Trunk Highway 5.
*This condition has been modified to include T.H. 41.
26. Increase landscape plantings to include 400 trees in addition to buffer yard plantings and
individual site plan landscaping.
*This condition shall be modified as follows: Landscaping along Highway 41 shall comply
with Buffer yard standard C (as per city code). Century Boulevard shall comply with
Buffer yard standard B. The master landscape plan for the Arboretum Business Park PUD
shall be the design guide for all of the specific site landscape developments. Each lot must
present a landscape plan for approval with the site plan review process.
27. A 10' clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees,
shrubs, bushes, NSP, US West, Cable TV, and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that
fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to
Chanhassen City Ordinance 9-1.
*This condition still applies.
28. Submit street names to Chanhassen Fire Marshal and Chanhassen Building Official for
review and approval.
*This condition has been met (Coulter Boulevard and Century Boulevard).
29. Existing structures on the property which may be demolished require a demolition permit.
Proof of septic and well systems that are abandoned are required.
*This condition still applies.
30. The permitted uses outlined on pages 7 and 8 of the staff report be amended as follows:
Institutional be deleted. Restaurant be permitted on either Lot 1, Block 3 or Lot 4, Block 4.
Convenience store with or without gas pumps be permitted on Lot 1 or Lot 2, Block 1 only.
Lot 5, Block 4, the intent of the city is that there be a major corporate user, or high end
Final Plat - Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition
May 11, 1998
Page 11
industrial with limited warehousing.
*The changes to the standards have been made. This condition shall be modified as
follows: The project and individual site users must comply with the development design
standards incorporated herein as Exhibit C of the development contract.
The issue over the parkland dedication be brought back before the Council with final
recommendations and numbers for consideration and agreement by the Council.
*This condition shall be modified as follows:
31. Full trail fees shall be collected per city ordinance for all lots in the Arboretum Business
Park 2nd Addition.
Staff is also recommending the addition of the following condition due to the city undertaking
the utility and street improvements necessary to undertake this project:
32. The developer agrees to waive any and all procedural or substantive objections to the
special assessments resulting from Project No. 97-lD improvements including, but not
limited to, hearing requirements and that the assessments as outlined in the feasibility
study for Phase III improvements of Project No. 97-1 (Coulter Boulevard Phase III)
exceeds the benefit to the property platted as Arboretum Business Park. The assessment
interest rate will be bond sale rate plus 1 Y2%, then rounded up to the nearest Y2%. The
assessment payback is not known yet but will be a minimum of 5 years.
Staff is recommending the following conditions be added after review of the development
proposal for this phase of the project:
33. The developer shall dedicate to the city a temporary turnaround easement over Lot 1,
Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2 to construct a turnaround with a 43-foot radius at the end of
Coulter Boulevard. The easement shall automatically expire with the connection of
Coulter Boulevard to Trunk Highway 41.
34. A cross-access easement shall be dedicated to the city over Lots 1 and 2, Block 2 for
access to the water tower site (Outlot A).
35. All driveway access points shall be constructed in accordance with the City's industrial
driveway detail plate No. 5207.
Final Plat - Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition
May 11, 1998
Page 12
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the following motion:
"The City Council approves PUD #92-6 granting Final Plat approval for Arboretum Business Park
2nd Addition creating six lots and three outlots, and associated right of way (plans prepared by
Schoell & Madsen, Inc.) subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant built NURP ponds for the entire site with the first phase of the development.
Credits from these NURP ponds provided the applicant with a surplus of SWMP credits. The
applicant is responsible for a water quantity fee of$126,614.00 with this phase of the
development.
2. The grading plan shall be revised to incorporate the following items: MnDOT's review
comments shall be incorporated into the final grading and development plan.
3. Final plat approval shall be conditioned upon the City awarding a bid for construction of Public
Improvement Project 97-1-D.
4. Coulter Boulevard, west of Century Boulevard, will be restricted to a right-inlright-out only at
Trunk Highway 41. All lots shall access onto interior streets and not Trunk Highways 41 or 5.
5. The developer shall enter into Addendum B to the Development Contract/PUD Agreement
for Arboretum Business Park and provide a financial security in the form of a letter of credit
to guarantee site grading of Century and Coulter Boulevards, administration fees, erosion
control measures, and site restoration. Upon execution of the addendum and receipt of the
necessary fees and permits, i.e. Watershed, NPDES, the developer may proceed with site
grading operations.
6. Type ill erosion control fencing will be required adjacent to wetland areas. Additional erosion
control fence may be necessary at the toe of steep slope areas and adjacent to storm water ponds
after the grading has been completed.
7. Erosion control blankets will be required on all slopes greater than 3: 1. Revegetation of the
exposed slopes shall occur immediately after grading is completed.
8. All areas disturbed as a result of construction activities shall be immediately restored with
seed and disc-mulched or wood fiber blanket or sod after completion of each activity in
accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook.
Final Plat - Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition
May 11, 1998
Page 13
9. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies, i.e.
Carver County, Watershed District, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, Health
Department, Minnesota Pollution control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources, Army Corps of Engineers and Minnesota Department of Transportation and
comply with their conditions of approval.
10. Fire hydrants shall be incorporated per the Fire Marshal's recommendations.
11. The appropriate drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated on the final plat for all
utilities and ponding areas lying outside the right-of-way. The easement width shall be a
minimum of 20 feet wide. Consideration should also be given for access for maintenance of
the ponding areas.
12. No berming or landscaping will be allowed within the right-of-way except landscaping along
the frontage road in accordance with the Trunk Highway 5 Corridor Study.
13. The lowest floor or opening elevation of all buildings shall be a minimum of 2 feet above the
1 OO-year high water level.
14. The applicant shall report to the City Engineer the location of any drain tiles found during
construction and shall relocate or abandon the drain-tile as directed by the City Engineer.
15. Final grades adjacent to Trunk Highways 41 and 5 will be subject to review and approval of
MnDOT for compatibility with the future widening of Trunk Highway 5 and Trunk Highway
41.
16. Landscaping along Highway 41 shall comply with Buffer yard standard C (as per city code).
Century Boulevard shall comply with Buffer yard standard B. The master landscape plan for
the Arboretum Business Park PUD shall be the design guide for all of the specific site
landscape developments. Each lot must present a landscape plan for approval with the site plan
reVIew process.
17. A 10' clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs,
bushes, NSP, US West, Cable TV, and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants
can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City
Ordinance 9-1.
18. Existing structures on the property which may be demolished require a demolition permit.
Proof of septic and well systems that are abandoned are required.
Final Plat - Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition
May 11, 1998
Page 14
19. The project and individual site users must comply with the development design standards
incorporated herein as Exhibit C of the development contract.
20. Full trail fees shall be collected per city ordinance for all lots in the Arboretum Business
Park 2nd Addition.
21. The developer agrees to waive any and all procedural or substantive objections to the special
assessments resulting from Project No. 97-1D improvements including, but not limited to,
hearing requirements and that the assessments as outlined in the feasibility study for Phase III
improvements of Project No. 97-1 (Coulter Boulevard Phase III) exceeds the benefit to the
property platted as Arboretum Business Park. The assessment interest rate will be bond sale
rate plus 1 Y2%, then rounded up to the nearest Y2%. The assessment payback is not known
yet but will be a minimum of 5 years.
22. The developer shall dedicate to the City a temporary turnaround easement over Lot 1, Block
1 and Lot 1, Block 2 to construct a turnaround with a 43-foot radius at the end of Coulter
Boulevard. The easement shall automatically expire with the connection of Coulter
Boulevard to Trunk Highway 41.
23. A cross-access easement shall be dedicated to the City over Lots 1 and 2, Block 2 for access
to the water tower site (Outlot A).
24. All driveway access points shall be constructed in accordance with the City's industrial
driveway detail plate No. 5207."
ATTACHMENTS
. 1. Exhibit C, Development Design Standards
2. Breakdown of Administrative Fees dated 5/5/98
3. Memo from Dave Hempel dated 5/5/98
4. Final grading plan
5. Final plat
g:\plan\bg\arborelum business park 2nd add fp.doc
Exhibit C
DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS
Development Standards
a. Intent
The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD light industrial/office park. The use of the PUD zone is
to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive
proposal. All utilities are required to be placed underground. Each lot proposed for development
shall proceed through site plan review based on the development standards outlined below.
Photo-composite images of proposed development adjacent to Highways 5 and 41 shall be
submitted as part of the review process. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a
higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Other uses may be permitted as listed
below if they are ancillary to a principal use in the development. Commercial/retail uses are
prohibited expect those uses specifically noted below.
b. Permitted Uses
The permitted uses in this zone should be limited to light industrial, warehousing, and office as
defined below. The uses shall be limited to those as defined herein. If there is a question as to
whether or not a use meets the definition, the City Council shall make that interpretation.
Permitted uses may be allowed on the different Blocks and Lots for which they are specified
below.
Light Industrial- The manufacturing, compounding, processing, assembling, packaging, or testing
of goods or equipment or research activities entirely within an enclosed structure, with no outside
storage. There shall be negligible impact upon the surrounding environment by noise, vibration,
smoke, dust or pollutants. (Lots 3, 4, and 5, Block 1; Lot 1, Block 2; Lots 1,2, and 3, Block 4; and
the Wrase property)
Warehousing - Means the commercial storage of merchandise and personal property. (Lots 3, 4,
and 5, Block 1; and Lots 1,2, and 3, Block 4)
Office - Professional and business office. (Lots 1,2,3,4, and 5, Blockl; Lot 1, Block 2; Lot 1,
Block 3; Lotsl, 2, 3,4, and 5, Block 4; and the Wrase property)
Health Services- establishments primarily engaged in furnishing medical, surgical and other
health services to persons. (Lots 1 and 2, Block 1; Lot 1, Block 3; and Lot 4, Block 4)
Conferences/Convention Center - establishments designed to accommodate people in assembly,
providing conference and meeting services to individuals, groups, and organizations. (Lot 5,
Block 4)
Indoor RecreationIHealth Club - establishments engaged in operating reducing and other health
clubs, spas, and similar facilities featuring exercise and other physical fitness conditioning. (Lot
1, Block 3; and Lot 4, Block 4)
HoteVMotel- commercial establishments engaged in furnishing lodging, or lodging and meals, to
the general public. (Lot 1, Block 3; and Lot 4, Block 4)
Utility Services - Water towers and reservoir. (Lots 3, 4, and 5, Block 1; Lots 1,2, and 3, Block
4; and the Wrase property)
Commercial uses (permitted on lots specified as commercial in development standards
tabulation box)
1. Restaurant, permitted on Lot 1, Block 3 or Lot 4, Block 4. (One stand alone restaurant.)
2. Convenience store with or without gas pumps, not to exceed 12,000 square feet, on Lot 1 or
2, Block 1, only. (One convenience store.)
3. Banks, with or without drive up windows
4. Day Care - establishments providing for the care and supervision of infants and children on a
daily basis. (Lots 1 and 2, Block 1; Lot 1, Block 3; and Lot 4, Block 4)
Ancillary Uses (in conjunction with and integral to a primary use)
1. Fast Food (no drive-through and only in conjunction with and integral to a convenience
store).
2. Restaurant (only in conjunction with hotel/motel or convention/conference center).
3. Showroom - showroom type display area for products stored or manufactured on-site provided
that no more than 20 percent of the floor space is used for such display and sales.
4. Telecommunication Towers and Antennas
5. Car wash, in conjunction with convenience store.
6. Day Care
Prohibited uses
. Contractors Yard
. LumberYard
. Home Improvement/Bui1ding Supply
. Garden Center
. Auto related including sales and repair
. Home furnishings and equipment stores
. General Merchandise Store
c. Setbacks
The development is regulated by the Highway 5 and the PUD Standards. There are no minimum
requirements for setbacks on interior lot lines in the PUD zone. The following setbacks shall apply:
Street Frontage Minimum Setback
Buildin arkin
Hwys. 5 & 41 70/50
Coulter & North South Road 50/20
82n & West Local 30/20 NA
*Lot 5, Block 4, must only meet the maximum setback on one Highway frontage.
The average hard surface coverage does not include Outlots A and B. The PUD standard for
hard surface coverage is 70% for office and industrial uses. Anyone site/lot can exceed the 70
percent requirement but in no case can the entire finished development exceed 70 percent.
d. Development Standards Tabulation Box
1. Building Area
LOT/USE
Lot 3, Block 1
Lot 4, Block 1
Lot 5, Block 1
Lot 1, Block 4
Lot 2, Block 4
Lot 3, Block 4
Lot 1, Block 2
Lot 5, Block 4
Wrase
10.02
5.45
4.41
4.38
5.40
8.98
12.23
23.20
2.64
Building Size/F AR
s uare feet)
131,006
71,218
57,688
57,199
70,597
117,371
159,822
(.4 FAR) 404,279
35,500
Lot I, Block I
Lot 2, Blockl
Lot 4, Block 4 Office/Hotel
LotI, Block 3
Restaurant/Office
11,746/23,520
15,180/30,320
26,536/53,060
(.10FAR) 27937 /
83,770
5/1000) 59
(411000) 61
(5/1000) 133
(1611000) 447
(Note: Lot and Block numbers based on preliminary plat configuration)
Commercial sites may develop as office-industrial uses. Square footage for individual lots
may be reallocated within the development, by type, provided the maximum square footage
is not exceeded.
Building Square Footage Breakdown
Office 31% 368,000/(432,000)
Light Industrial 31% 368,000/(432,000)
Warehouse 31% 368,000/(432,000)
Commercial 7% 81,000/(0)
Total 100% 1,186,000 / (1,295,000)
*includes the Wrase property. () represents conversion of commercial uses to office-
industrial uses
2. More than one (I) principal structure may be placed on one (1) platted lot.
3. Building height shall be limit 3 stories or 40 feet.
4. Lot 5, Block 4, is intended to accommodate a major corporate headquarters or office,
research, high end manufacturing with limited warehousing type user. While the majority
of the development is based on 30 percent office space, Lot 5 must have a minimum of 40
percent office use and include multi-story building( s).
e. Building Materials and Design
I. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural
standards and site design. All mechanical equipment shall be screened with material
compatible to the building.
2. All materials shall be of high quality and durable. Masonry material shall be used. Color
shall be introduced through colored block or panels and not painted cinder block.
3. Brick may be used and must be approved to assure uniformity.
4. Block shall have a weathered face or be polished, fluted, or broken face.
5. Concrete may be poured in place, tilt-up or pre-cast, and shall be finished in stone, textured
or coated.
6. Metal siding will not be approved except as support material to one of the above materials
or curtain wall on office components or, as trim or as HV AC screen.
7. All accessory structures shall be designed to be compatible with the primary structure.
8. All roof mounted equipment shall be screened by walls of compatible appearing material or
camouflaged to blend into the building or background. Wood screen fences are prohibited.
All exterior process machinery, tanks, etc., are to be fully screened by compatible materials.
9. The use oflarge unadorned, pre-stressed concrete panels and concrete block shall be
prohibited. Acceptable materials will incorporate textured surfaces, exposed aggregate
and/or other patterning. All walls shall be given added architectural interest through
building design or appropriate landscaping. The buildings shall have varied and interesting
detailing. The use of large unadorned, concrete panels and concrete block, or a solid wall
unrelieved by architectural detailing, such as change in materials, change in color,
fenestrations, or other significant visual relief provided in a manner or at intervals in
keeping with the size, mass, and scale of the wall and its views from public ways shall be
prohibited. Acceptable materials will incorporate textured surfaces, exposed aggregate
and/or other patterning. All walls shall be given added architectural interest through
building design or appropriate landscaping.
10. Space for recycling shall be provided in the interior of all principal structures or within an
enclosure for all developments in the Business Center.
11 Each buildings shall contain one or more pitched roof elements depending on scale and
type of building, or other architectural treatments such as towers, arches, vaults, entryway
projections, canopies and detailing to add additional interest and articulation to structures.
12. There shall be no underdeveloped sides of buildings visible from public right-of-ways.
All elevations visible from the street shall receive nearly equal treatment and visual
qualities.
f. Site Landscaping and Screening
1. Landscaping along Highways 41 and 5 shall comply with Buffer yard standard C (as per
city code). Coulter Boulevard, the north south street, and West 82nd Street shall comply
with Buffer yard standard B. The master landscape plan for the Arboretum Business Park
PUD shall be the design guide for all of the specific site landscape developments. Each lot
must present a landscape plan for approval with the site plan review process.
2. Storage of material outdoors is prohibited unless it has been approved under site plan
review. All approved outdoor storage must be screened with masonry fences and/or
landscaping.
3. Undulating or angular berms or elevation changes of3' in height shall be placed along
Coulter Boulevard, and the North/ South Street. The berms shall be sodded or seeded at
the conclusion of each project Phase grading and utility construction. The required buffer
landscaping may be installed incrementally, but it shall be required where it is deemed
necessary to screen any proposed development. All required boulevard landscaping shall be
sodded.
4. Loading areas shall be screened 100 percent year round from public right-of-ways. Wing
walls may be required where deemed appropriate.
g. Sign age
1. All freestanding signs be limited to monument signs. The sign shall not exceed eighty (80)
square feet in sign display area nor be greater than eight (8) feet in height. The sign
treatment is an element of the architecture and thus should reflect with the quality of the
development. The signs should be consistent in color, size, and material throughout the
development. The applicant should submit a sign package for staff review.
2. Each property shall be allowed one monument sign per street frontage.
3. The signage will have consistency throughout the development. A common theme will be
introduced at the development's entrance monument and will be used throughout.
4. Consistency in signage shall relate to color, size, materials, and heights.
5. The Gateway PUD shall be permitted two Gateway business identification signs. One sign
per project entrance, at West 82nd and the north/south road and at Highway 41 and the
westerly roadway, shall be permitted. Said sign shall not exceed 80 square feet in sign area
nor be greater than eight feet in height.
6. Wall sign shall be permitted per city ordinance for industrial office park site.
7. All signs shall require a separate sign permit.
8. Signage for the main entrance on Highway 5 and the north/south road shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Commission and City Council.
h. Lighting
1. Lighting for the interior of the business center should be consistent throughout the
development. The applicant's proposal is consistent with the lighting standards for the PUD
ordinance. The plans do not provide for street lighting. As with previous industrial
parks/roadways, the City has required the developer to install street lights throughout the
street system. The street lights should be designed consistent with the existing lighting
along the existing Coulter Boulevard.
2. A decorative, shoe box fixture (high pressure sodium vapor lamps) with a square
ornamental pole shall be used throughout the development area for area lighting.
3 Lighting equipment similar to what is mounted in the public street right-of-ways shall be
used in the private areas.
4. All light fixtures shall be shielded. Light level for site lighting shall be no more than 1/2
candle at the property line. This does not apply to street lighting.
i. Alternative Access
1. Each site shall accommodate transit service within the individual development whenever
possible.
2. Pedestrian access shall be provided from each site to the public sidewalk and trail system.
3. The developer and site users shall promote and encourage Traffic Demand Management
Strategies.
4. Each site shall provide areas for bicycle parking and storage.
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
ARBORETUM BUSINESS PARK 2ND ADDITION
PROJECT NO. 98-10
BREAKDOWN OF ADMINISTRATION FEES - 5/5/98
Estimated Total Cost of Public Improvements ................................................................... $ 60,000.00
- 3% of Public Improvement Costs (Under $500,000)........................................................ $ 1,800.00
- Final Plat Process (Escrow For Attorney Fee for Review and Recording of Plat
and Development Contract) .......... ...... ........ ........ ...... ...... ....... ........ ............ ............. $
400.00
- Recording Fees
a. Addendum"B" to Development Contract/PUD Agreement ............................... $
b. Plat Filing ............ ............ ........ ............... ........ ............. ...... ........... ........... ...... ...... $
c. Turnaround Easement. ........... ............................ ...................... .......... ................. $
30.00
30.00
30.00
- 1/3 Trail Fees (28.1 acres at $1,500 per acre/3)................................................................. $ 14,050.00
- SWMP Fees (Water Quantity - 29.04 Acres x 4,360 per acre)......................................... $126,614.00
- GIS Fees ($25 per plat and $10 per parcel) ...................................................................... $ 115.00
TOT AL ADMINISTRATION FEES ............................................................................. $143,fl69..00
c: Todd Hoffman, Park & Recreation Director
Phillip Elkin, Water Resources Coordinator
Fred Richter, Steiner Development
\'dsl\vol2\eng\lc\arboretum 2nd.fee.doc
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
'0 City Center Drive, PO Box 147
Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317
Phone 612.937.1900
General Fax 612.937.5139
:ngineering Fax 612.937.9152
'ub/ic Safety Fax 612.934.2524
\Veb www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Bob Generous, Senior Planner
Dave Hempel, Assistant City Engineer *
FROM:
DATE:
May 5, 1998
SUBJ:
Review of Final Plat - Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition
Project No. 98-10
Upon review of the final plat documents prepared by Schoell & Madson, Inc.,
stamped April 30, 1998, I offer the following comments and recommendations:
SITE GRADING
On May 27, 1997, the City Council approved Interim Use Permit No. 97-1 for site
grading within this development. The grading and storm water pond construction
has been completed for Phase I and part of this phase. Grading for this phase will
include Coulter Boulevard west of Century Boulevard and Lots 1 through 4, Block
4. The City's water tower site will also be included. Security will be required to
guarantee site grading of Coulter and Century Boulevards and erosion control
measures.
DRAINAGE
In conjunction with the City's Public Improvement Project No. 97-1D, a storm
water drainage system will be constructed within Coulter Boulevard to convey
most of the development's storm water runoff for this phase and future phases into
the existing stormwater ponds for pretreatment prior to discharging into the
wetlands.
UTILITIES
Under the City's Public Improvement Project No. 97-1D, the City will be installing
. the sanitary sewer and water lines necessary to serve this phase and subsequent
phases. The developer will be assessed their fair share of the improvements in
accordance with the feasibility study. A 20-foot wide drainage and utility
easement is being dedicated over Lots 1 and 2, Block 2 for extension of a
watermain to the City's water tower site (Outlot A). A cross access easement
should also be granted to the City over these lots for access in case development of
these lots impede the access along the 20-foot wide drainage and utility easement.
. City ofChanhassen. A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a chaJming downtown, thriving businesses, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and pldy.
Bob Generous
Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition
May 5, 1998
Page 2
STREETS
This phase will include street improvements along Century Boulevard up to the
north lot line of Lot 4, Block 1 and a temporary cul-de-sac at the end of Coulter
Boulevard. Eventually Coulter Boulevard will be extended out to Trunk Highway
41 with a right-in/right-out when MnDOT upgrades Trunk Highway 41.
Additional street easement will be necessary for the temporary cul-de-sac to
construct a turnaround with a 43-foot radius at the end of Coulter Boulevard. The
street will be constructed under the City's contract for Project No. 97-lD.
Based on traffic studies, this development and future phases will impact local and
regional transportation systems from an operational and safety standpoint. Traffic
signals will be necessary at the intersections of 82nd Street West and Trunk
Highway 41 as well as Trunk Highway 5 and Century Boulevard. The signals at
82nd Street and Trunk Highway 41 are scheduled for installation in 1999. With
Phase I the developer escrowed with the City a financial guarantee for their share
of the local cost participation for construction of auxiliary turn lanes and traffic
signals at 82nd Street and Trunk Highway 41. No additional security will be
required with this phase.
The final plat proposes to dedicate sufficient right-of-way for the roadway systems
throughout. The future extension of Coulter Boulevard west of Century
Boulevard is proposed with an 60-foot wide right-of-way, in accordance with City
subdivision regulations.
Sidewalksffrails will be constructed as a part of the street improvements. A 5-
foot wide concrete sidewalk will be installed along the south side of Coulter
Boulevard and an 8-foot wide bituminous trail along the east side of Century
Boulevard.
MISCELLANEOUS
Since this development requires a public improvement project to construct the
infrastructures and streets to serve the site, final plat approval should be
conditioned upon the City awarding a contract for Improvement Project No. 97-
ID. The developer could be allowed to commence with site grading conditioned
upon entering into Addendum B to the Development Contract/PUD Agreement
with the City for Arboretum Business Park and providing security to guarantee
erosion control measures and site restoration. The administration fees total
$143,069 which includes 1/3 trail fees, SWMP fees and recording fees (see
attached breakdown of fees dated 5/5/98).
Bob Generous
Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition
May 5, 1998
Page 3
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. The developer shall enter into Addendum B to the Development
Contract/PUD Agreement for Arboretum Business Park and provide a
financial security in the form of a letter of credit to guarantee site grading
of Century and Coulter Boulevards, administration fees, erosion control
measures, and site restoration. Upon execution of the addendum and
receipt of the necessary fees and permits, i.e. Watershed, NPDES, the
developer may proceed with site grading operations.
2. Final plat approval shall be conditioned upon the City awarding a bid for
construction of Public Improvement Project No. 97-1-D.
3. The developer shall dedicate to the City a temporary turnaround easement
over Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2 to construct a turnaround with a
43-foot radius at the end of Coulter Boulevard. The easement shall
automatically expire with the connection of Coulter Boulevard to Trunk
Highway 41.
4. A cross-access easement shall be dedicated to the City over Lots 1 and 2,
Block 2 for access to the water tower site (Outlot A).
5. All driveway access points shall be constructed in accordance with the
City's industrial driveway detail plate No. 5207.
6. All areas disturbed as a result of construction activities shall be immediately
restored with seed and disc-mulched or wood fiber blanket or sod after
completion of each activity in accordance with the City's Best Management
Practice Handbook.
Attachment: Breakdown of Administration Fees dated 5/5/98.
c: Anita Benson, City Engineer
\\dsl\vol2\eng\projects\arboretum\arboretwn 2nd\review of final plat memo.doc